20201798 Ver 1_Six Runs_100170_MY1_2023_20240228

February 15, 2024

Sent via email: [e-mail]
Matthew Deangelo
RES

Subject: DMS Comments on the MY1 2023 Draft Report
Six Runs ID # 100170, DMS Contract # 0303-01

Matthew,

DMS received the MY1 2023 draft report on 12/22/23 and a site visit was conducted prior for an IRT as-built visit on 11/9/2023. DMS offers the following comments for the report period:

Report
1. Table of Contents - Section 1.2 does not reference Table 1 and Section 1.3 does not include
reference to Tables 2 and 3.
2. Appendix A - Visual Stream Stability Assessment & Vegetation Condition Tables are not labeled Table 5
and Table 6 as described in the Table of Contents.
3. Appendix D – The Stream Stage/Flow and Groundwater Hydrographs start on March 30, 2023.
In Section 1.5, project completion was March 3, 2023. Please state when gauges were installed
in Sections 1.5.2 through 1.5.4.
Digital Review
1. Please include the required IRT approved wetland hydrology performance standard in the
Groundwater Gauge Summary table in all future submissions. The inclusion of this standard
enables the reviewer to accurately assess the project’s success.

Please incorporate the revisions and responses to comment letter, one (1) hardcopy, and one (1) pdf
copy along with any updated digital files that may be needed based on the comments above. If you
have any questions or wish to discuss these comments further, please contact me at any time. I can be
reached at [phone], or via email at [e-mail]
Sincerely,
Danielle Mir
Eastern Project Manager
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services

cc: Jamey McEachran

3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612

Corporate Headquarters
6575 W Loop S #300
Bellaire, TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400

res.us

February 27, 2024

Danielle Mir
NC DEQ Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27604

RE: DMS Comments on the MY1 Report Six Runs, Project ID #100170, DMS Contract #0303-
01, RFP 16-20190303

Listed below are comments provided by DMS on February 15, 2024 regarding the Six Runs
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project Year 1 Monitoring Report and RES’ responses.

Report Comments:
1. Table of Contents - Section 1.2 does not reference Table 1 and Section 1.3 does not include
reference to Tables 2 and 3.
The Table of Contents has been updated to reference the locations of Tables 1, 2, and 3 within
the text.

2. Appendix A - Visual Stream Stability Assessment & Vegetation Condition Tables are not
labeled Table 5 and Table 6 as described in the Table of Contents.
Tables 5 and 6 have been updated accordingly to include their respective titles.

3. Appendix D – The Stream Stage/Flow and Groundwater Hydrographs start on March 30, 2023.
In Section 1.5, project completion was March 3, 2023. Please state when gauges were installed
in Sections 1.5.2 through 1.5.4.
As stated in Section 1.5, project construction and planting were completed on March 3, 2023.
However, all gauges were installed March 28, 2023, and the pressure transducers did not start
recording data until March 30, 2023. The dates of gauge installation were added to Sections
1.5.2 through 1.5.4.

Digital Comments:
1. Please include the required IRT approved wetland hydrology performance standard in the
Groundwater Gauge Summary table in all future submissions. The inclusion of this standard
enables the reviewer to accurately assess the project’s success.
The IRT performance standard for wetland hydrology, which states that the hydroperiod of
each growing season must be at least 12%, has been included in both Tables 14 and 15 for
easy reference.

FINAL MONITORING YEAR 1 (MY1) REPORT
SIX RUNS STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION PROJECT

Sampson County, North Carolina
Cape Fear River Basin
HUC 03030006

NCDMS Project #100170
DMS Contract #0303-01
RFP: 16-20190303
USACE Action ID: SAW-2020-01964 | DWR Project #20201798 v1

Provided by:
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
for Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC

Prepared for:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

February 2024

Table of Contents
1 Project Summary .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 
1.1 Project Location and Description .......................................................................................................................... 1 
1.2 Project Components ................................................................................................................................................... 1 
Table 1. Six Runs (#100170) Mitigation Quantities and Credits ................................................................. 2  
1.3 Project Goals and Objectives .................................................................................................................................. 3 
Table 2. Project Summary Goals, Performance, and Results ........................................................................ 4 
Table 3. Project Attributes .......................................................................................................................................... 5 
1.4 Construction and As-Built Conditions ................................................................................................................. 6 
1.5 Year 1 Monitoring Performance (MY1) ............................................................................................................... 6 
1.5.1 Vegetation ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 
1.5.2 Stream Hydrology ............................................................................................................................................ 7 
1.5.3 Stream Geomorphology ................................................................................................................................ 7 
1.5.4 Wetland Hydrology .......................................................................................................................................... 8 
2 References ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 
Appendix A: Visual Assessment Data
Figure 1. Site Location Map
Figures 2a-c. Current Conditions Plan View
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Vegetation Plot Photos
Crossing Photos
Monitoring Device Photos

Appendix B: Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Planted Species Summary
Table 8. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 9. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species

Appendix C: Stream Morphology Data
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 11. Cross Section Morphology Data Table
Cross Section Overlay Plots

Appendix D: Hydrologic Data
Table 12. 2023 Rainfall Summary
Table 13. Documentation of Bankfull Events
Stream Stage and Flow Hydrographs
Table 14. 2023 Max Hydroperiods
Table 15. Summary of Groundwater Monitoring Results
Groundwater Hydrographs

Appendix E: Project Timeline and Contact Information
Table 4. Project Timeline and Contact Information
Six Runs Mitigation Project 1 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Project #100170 February 2024

1 Project Summary
1.1 Project Location and Description
The Six Runs Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project (Project) is located within Sampson County,
approximately six and a half miles west of Faison, NC. The Project lies within the Cape Fear River Basin,
North Carolina Department of Water Resources (NCDWR) sub-basin 03-06-19 and United States Geological
Survey (USGS) 14-digit hydrologic unit code (HUC) 03030006110010 (Six Runs Creek Watershed; Figure 1).
The Project was designed to help meet compensatory mitigation requirements for stream and wetland
impacts in the HUC 03030006. The Project restores 5,788 linear feet (LF) and enhances 1,656 LF of stream
as well as re-establishes 6.221 acres (ac), rehabilitates 4.913 ac, enhances 1.008 ac, and preserves 1.656 ac
of wetlands that will ultimately provide water quality benefits and ecosystem uplift for the Project’s 0.89 mi2
(570 ac) drainage area.

The Project is comprised of a 30.94-acre easement located along Six Runs Creek, encompassing a portion
of the Six Runs Creek floodplain and several tributaries. The Project involves Brad’s Branch (a colloquial
name for the primary tributary feature draining to Six Runs Creek), five of its unnamed tributaries, and
riparian wetlands that all drain into Six Runs Creek which eventually drains south to the Black River. The
stream and wetland mitigation components are summarized in Table 1. The upstream extent of the Project
begins at a property boundary upstream of E Darden Road and the downstream extent ends within the Six
Runs Creek swamp. The site is easily accessible from E Darden Road. Coordinates for the Project are as
follows: 35.0962°, -78.2304°.

1.2 Project Components
Prior to restoration, the riparian corridors within the Project had been manipulated by agricultural practices
over time, thereby adversely impacting both streams and wetlands. Most streams were degraded in varying
degrees and were restored or enhanced to attain higher function. Non-jurisdictional areas of hydric soil
within riparian areas were restored via re-establishment to improve both hydrologic and vegetative
functions. Jurisdictional riparian wetland areas that were severely degraded in terms of vegetation and
riparian function were rehabilitated to improve vegetative function and stream interaction. Other
jurisdictional wetland areas that were partially forested but degraded from constant cattle pressure were
enhanced to improve vegetative function. A small area of mixed, jurisdictional wetland types, including
frequently inundated marsh and forested swamp, within the Six Runs floodplain, were preserved.
Importantly, cattle no longer have access to the aquatic resources within the Project. These improvements
to the Project will help meet the river basin needs expressed in the Division of Mitigation Services’ (DMS)
2009 Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP).

Through stream restoration and enhancement, the Project presented 7,444 LF of stream mitigation,
generating 6,660.599 Warm Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs). By incorporating wider buffers, the total
adjusted SMUs for the Project amounted to 6,724.599 SMU (Table 1). Additionally, the Project presented
13.798 acres of wetland re-establishment, rehabilitation, enhancement, and preservation, generating 10.044
Riparian Wetland Mitigation Units (WMU; Table 1). Additional wetland areas amounting to 1.379 acres were
presented that will not generate mitigation credit but are protected within the conservation easement.
These asset numbers reflect those in the approved mitigation plan.
Six Runs Mitigation Project 2 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Project #100170 February 2024

Table 1. Six Runs (#100170) Mitigation Quantities and Credits

Original
Mitigation Original Original Original
Plan As‐Built Mitigation Restoration Mitigation
Project Segment Ft/Ac Ft/Ac Category Level Ratio (X:1) Credits Comments
Stream
BB‐A 452 452 Warm E1 1.50000 301.333
Structure installation, supplemental  planting, invasives treatment, 
livestock exclusion
BB‐B 562 562 Warm E1 1.50000 374.666
Structure installation, meander stabilization, supplemental  planting, 
invasives treatment, livestock exclusion
BB‐C 4,357 4,357 Warm R 1.00000 4,357.000
Channel restoration, riparian planting, invasives treatment, livestock 
exclusion
DE2‐A 231 231 Warm E2 2.50000 92.400
ESP installation, supplemental planting, invasives  treatment, livestock 
exclusion
DE2‐B 156 156 Warm R 1.00000 156.000
Channel restoration, riparian planting, invasives  treatment, livestock 
exclusion
DE4‐A 301 301 Warm E2 5.00000 60.200 Supplemental pla nting, invasives treatment, livestock exclusion
DE4‐B 992 992 Warm R 1.00000 992.000
Channel restoration, riparian planting, invasives treatment, livestock 
exclusion
DE7 112 108 Warm R 1.00000 112.000
Channel restoration, riparian planting, invasives treatment, livestock 
exclusion
DE8 171 171 Warm R 1.00000 171.000
Hydrologic reconnection, channel restoration, riparian planting, 
invasives treatment, livestock exclusion
MT2 110 110 Warm E2 2.50000 44.000
Supplemental  planting, invasives treatment, livestock exclusion
Wetland
WC‐1 4.903 4.859 R RH 1.50000 3.269
Reconnect to stream via stream restoration, wetland planting, 
livestock exclusion
WC‐2 1.656 1.656 R P 10.00000 0.166
Livestock exclusion
WD 0.010 0.009 R RH 1.50000 0.007
Reconnect to stream via stream restoration, riparian planting, 
livestock exclusion
WE‐1 0.411 0.410 R E 5.00000 0.082 Supplemental planting, invasives treatment, livestock exclusion
WE‐2 0.597 0.586 R E 2.00000 0.299 Wetland planting, invasives treatment, livestock exclusion 
WL 5.759 5.693 R REE 1.00000 5.759
Stream restoration, spoil/berm removal/grading, native planting, 
livestock exclusion
WM 0.462 0.457 R REE 1.00000 0.462
Stream restoration, spoil/berm removal/grading, native planting, 
livestock exclusion
Project Credits
Riparian Non‐Rip Coastal
Warm Cool Cold Wetland Wetland Marsh
Restoration 5,788.000
Re‐establishment 6.221
Rehabilitation 3.276
Enhancement 0.082
Enhancement I 675.999 0.299
Enhancement II (2.5) 136.400
Enhancement II (5.0) 60.200
Creation
Preservation 0.166
Totals 6,660.599
Non‐Standard Buffer 
Width Adjustment 64.00
Total Stream Credit 6,724.599
Total Wetland Credit 10.044
Restoration Level
Stream
Six Runs Mitigation Project 3 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Project #100170 February 2024

1.3 Project Goals and Objectives
Prior to construction the streams and wetlands had been significantly impacted by historic relocation and
straightening of stream channels, hay production, cattle farming, and lack of riparian buffer. The past land
use disturbances, absence of buffer vegetation, and current agricultural practices presented a significant
opportunity for water quality and ecosystem improvements through the implementation of this Project.
Through the comprehensive analysis of the Project’s maximum functional uplift using the Stream Functions
Pyramid Framework, specific, attainable goals and objectives are being realized by the Project. These goals
clearly help to address the degraded hydrology, water quality, and habitat from agricultural practices that
were identified as major watershed stressors in the DMS 2009 Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities
(RBRP) and within DMS’ Targeted Resource Areas (TRA). Ultimately, the Project supports DMS’ watershed
goals listed in the Approved Mitigation Plan. The Project Summary Goals, Performance, and Results are
provided below in Table 2. The Project Attributes are found in Table 3.
Six Runs Mitigation Project 4 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Project #100170 February 2024

Table 2. Project Summary Goals, Performance, and Results

Objective Treatment Monitoring Metric Success Criteria Measurement Cumulative Monitoring Results
Improve the transport of water
from the watershed to the
Project reaches in a non-erosive
way and maintain appropriate
wetland hydrology for Bibb and
Johnston soil series
Converted land-use of some
Project reaches from pasture to
riparian forest.
Restored and enhanced wetland
hydrology through stream
restoration activities and spoil
removal
Groundwater wells with pressure
transducers: Downloaded
quarterly
Water table within 12 inches of
the ground surface for 12% of
growing season (approx. 31
days)
Growing season: 3/14 - 11/22
11 goundwater wells 3/11 passed - MY1
Stage recorders:
Inspected semiannually
Four bankfull events occurring
in separate years
Continuous stage
recorders on BB-C
upper, DE4-A, and BB-C
lower
3/3 BF Events - MY1
Flow gauges:
Inspected quarterly
30+ days of continuous flow
each year
Flow gauges on BB-A,
DE7, DE2-A, DE8, and
MT2
4/5 passed - MY1
Cross sections: Surveyed in
MY 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7
Bank height ratio shall not
exceed 1.2 36 Cross section surveys 36/36 with BHR<1.2 - MY0
36/36 with BHR<1.2 - MY1
As-built stream profile N/A N/A Survey conducted
Groundwater wells with pressure
transducers: Downloaded
quarterly
Water table within 12 inches of
the ground surface for 12% of
growing season (approx. 31
days)
Growing season: 3/14 - 11/22
11 goundwater wells
installed 3/11 passed - MY1
Vegetation plots: Surveyed in
MY 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7
MY 1-3: ≥320 trees/acre
MY 5: ≥260 trees/acre (7 ft. tall)
MY 7: ≥210 trees/acre (10 ft. tall)
13 fixed veg plots and 6
random plots (19 total)
19/19 passed - MY0
18/19 passed - MY1
Visual assessment of established
fencing and conservation
signage:
Performed at least semiannually
Inspect fencing and signage.
Identify and document any
damaged or missing fencing
and/or signs
Visual Assessment
conducted
Fencing and signage are in place - MY0
Fencing and signage are in place - MY1
Improve flood-bank
connectivity by reducing bank
height ratios and increase
entrenchment ratios
Maintain regular, seasonal flow
in restored, intermittent streams
Reduced bank height ratios and
increased entrenchment ratios
by reconstructing channels to
mimic reference reach
conditions
Limit erosion rates and maintain
channel stability
Improve bedform diversity (pool
spacing, percent riffles, etc.
Increase buffer width to 50 feet
Established a riparian buffer to
reduce erosion and sediment
transport into project streams.
Established stable banks with
livestakes, erosion control
matting, and other in stream
structures.
Cross sections: Surveyed in
MY 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7
Visual monitoring: Performed at
least semiannually
Vegetation plots: Surveyed in
MY 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7
Identify and document
significant stream problem
areas; i.e. erosion, degradation,
aggradation, etc.
MY 1-3: ≥320 trees/acre
MY 5: ≥260 trees/acre (7 ft. tall)
MY 7: ≥210 trees/acre (10 ft. tall)
Promote sediment filtration,
nutrient cycling, and organic
accumulation through natural
wetland biogeochemical
processes
Establish native hardwood
riparian buffer
Protect aquatic resources in
perpetuity
Restored and enhance wetland
hydrology
Planted a riparian buffer
Established permanent
conservation easement
Bank height ratio shall not
exceed 1.2 36 Cross section surveys 36/36 with BHR<1.2 - MY0
36/36 with BHR<1.2 - MY1
Visual Assessment
conducted
No problem areas - MY0
No problem areas - MY1
13 fixed veg plots and 6
random plots (19 total)
19/19 passed - MY0
18/19 passed - MY1
Six Runs Mitigation Project 5 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Project #100170 February 2024

Table 3. Project Attributes

USGS Hydrologic Unit 8‐
BB‐CDE2‐ADE2‐BDE3DE4‐ADE4‐BDE7 DE8 MT2
4207 231 114 128 301 667 251 61 110
4357 231 156 0 301 992 112 171 110
Unconfined Moderately 
confined
Moderately 
confined NA Unconfined Unconfined NA
Moderately 
confined
Moderately 
confined
570 N/A 10 26 287 295 21 26 9
Perennial Intermittent Intermittent Intermittent Perennial Perennial Intermittent Intermittent Intermittent
C, Sw C, Sw C, Sw C, Sw C, Sw C, Sw C, Sw C, Sw C, Sw
G4/5c ‐ F4/5 E5 E5 F5 C5 G4/5c ‐ F4/5 G5c F5b E4/5
C4/E4 E5 C4b N/A C5 C4/E4 B4a to E4 C4/E4 E4/5
IV II II III I III III II I
WC‐1WC‐2WDWE‐1WE‐2WF WG WH WI WJ WKWLWM
5.146 1.656 0.016 0.849 0.767 0.348 0.002 0.057 0.204 0.123 0.034 0 0
4.903 1.656 0.01 0.848 0.689 0.299 0.001 0.057 0.198 0.123 0.034 5.759 0.462
Riparian Riparian Riparian Riparian Riparian Riparian Riparian Riparian Riparian Riparian Riparian Riparian Riparian
Bibb and Johnston 
soils
Bibb and 
Johnston soils
Bibb and 
Johnston soils
Bibb and 
Johnston soils
Bibb and 
Johnston 
soils
Bibb and 
Johnston 
soils
Bibb and 
Johnston soils
Bibb and 
Johnston soils
Bibb and 
Johnston soils
Bibb and 
Johnston 
soils
Bibb and 
Johnston 
soils
Bibb and 
Johnston 
soils
Bibb and 
Johnston 
soils
Hydric Hydric Hydric Hydric Hydric Hydric Hydric Hydric Hydric Hydric Hydric Hydric Hydric
Supporting Docs?
PCN
PCN
Mitigation Plan
Mitigation Plan
N/A
Mitigation Plan
N/A
N/A
Area to be planted (acres)22.59
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude decimal 35.0962°, ‐78.2304°
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Rolling Coastal Plain
Table 3. Project Attribute Table
Project Name Six Runs Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project
County Sampson
Project Area (acres) 30.94
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area 1%
 Land Use Classification Agriculture, forest, residential
Reach Summary Information
Parameters BB‐ABB‐B
River Basin Cape Fear
3030006
DWR Sub‐basin 03‐06‐19
Project Drainage Area (acres)570
Valley confinement (Confined, moderately confined, 
unconfined)
Moderately 
confined
Moderately 
confined
Drainage area (acres)93 125
Pre‐project length (feet)453 572
Post‐project (feet)452 562
Dominant Stream Classification (existing)C4/5 G4/5c
Dominant Stream Classification (proposed)C4/5 G4/5c
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral Intermittent Intermittent
NCDWR Water Quality Classification C, Sw C, Sw
Pre‐project (acres)0.081 0.057
Post‐project (acres)0.081 0.057
Dominant Evolutionary class (Simon) if applicable III III
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters WA WB
Soil Hydric Status Non‐hydric Non‐hydric
Regulatory Considerations
Parameters Applicable? Resolved?
Wetland Type (non‐riparian, riparian)Riparian Riparian
Mapped Soil Series Norfolk loamy 
sand
Norfolk 
loamy sand
Endangered Species Act Yes Yes
Historic Preservation Act Yes Yes
Water of the United States ‐ Section 404 Yes No
Water of the United States ‐ Section 401 Yes No
Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A
DOT Right‐of‐way Permit Yes Yes
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA or CAMA)No N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance Yes No
Six Runs Mitigation Project 6 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Project #100170 February 2024

1.4 Construction and As-Built Conditions
Project construction was completed on March 3rd, 2023, and planting was completed on March 3rd, 2023.
The Six Runs Project was built to design plans and guidelines with some minor modifications. Such
modifications are summarized below:

 Added several Post-Assisted Log Structures (PALS) to reaches BB-A/B;
 Swapped several brush toes for stone toes;
 Swapped two brush toes for sod mats in lower portion of reach BB-C;
 Added floodplain sills in very wet areas susceptible to erosion;
 Minor alignment change at upper segment of BB-C – This was a design revision in the Final
Construction Plans. This did not result in change in LF.
 Minor alignment change at lower segment of DE7 – This was a field-adjustment to avoid an existing
mature tree. This resulted in minor loss of LF.

Also, note that fencing was not surveyed in the areas surrounding reaches BB-A/B (above E Darden Rd.);
however, fencing was installed and verified in the field. The missing areas will be surveyed as soon as
possible and will be provided in the Final As-built Survey and Baseline Monitoring Report.

The as-built survey and record drawings are included in Appendix F.

There were no changes to the planting plan (Table 7 in Appendix B). Minor monitoring device location
changes were made during as-built installation, however, the quantities remained as proposed in the
Mitigation Plan.

1.5 Year 1 Monitoring Performance (MY1)
The Six Runs Year 1 Monitoring activities were performed in November 2023. All Baseline Monitoring data
is presented below and in the appendices. The Project is on track to meeting stream, wetland, and
vegetation interim success criteria.

1.5.1 Vegetation
Monitoring of the 13 permanent vegetation plots and six random vegetation plots was completed on
November 8th, 2023. Vegetation data is in Appendix B, and associated photos and plot locations are in
Appendix A. MY1 monitoring data indicates that 18 of 19 plots exceed the interim success criteria of 320
planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 283 to 972 planted stems per acre with a mean
of 586 planted stems per acre across all plots. A total of 21 planted species were documented within the
plots. The average stem height in the vegetation plots was 2.0 feet. Data at one random vegetation plot,
(RVP-6) located in the riparian area of reach DE4-B, represented only 283 stems per acre. This back-
calculates to being one tree short of the success criterion within the plot. However, a portion of this plot
was located in an existing forested area that was only supplementally planted at a much lower density. In
fact, if existing, mature trees within the plot had been counted, the stem density would have exceeded the
320 stems per acre success criterion. With that said, RES will continue performing random plots in the same
general area in future years.

Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that herbaceous vegetation is
established throughout the project area (Appendix A). Small clusters of cattails were observed sporadically

Six Runs Mitigation Project 7 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Project #100170 February 2024

throughout floodplain areas but are currently too small to map. However, RES is aware that they could
become more widespread in the future and will assess again in 2024 and remediate, if necessary.

1.5.2 Stream Hydrology
Three stage recorders and five flow gauges were installed on March 28th, 2023, and continue to record
stream hydrology events. The stage recorders are in place to document bankfull events. Two stage recorders
were installed on BB-C and one was installed on DE-4.
- The stage recorder on BB-C DS (the downstream of BB-C) recorded three bankfull events in MY1
with the highest reading being 0.67 feet above the top of bank.
- The stage recorder on BB-C US (upstream of BB-C) recorded four bankfull events in MY1 with the
highest reading being 0.49 feet above the top of bank.
- The stage recorder on DE4-B recorded five bankfull events in MY1 with the highest reading being
0.91 feet above the top of bank.

The flow gauges are in place to document the presence and persistence of stream flow in intermittent
channels. One flow gauge was installed on each of the reaches: BB-A, MT2, DE7, DE2-B, and DE8.
- The flow gauge on BB-A documented 71 consecutive days of flow.
- The flow gauge on MT2 documented 18 consecutive days of flow.
o MT2 is an Enhancement II reach where cattle exclusion was the primary activity to provide
functional uplift. With two consecutive dry years and data only being collected since
March 30th, 2023, RES is confident that flow success criterion will be met during a normal
wet season.
- The flow gauge on DE7 documented 222 consecutive days of flow.
- The flow gauge on DE2-B documented 142 consecutive days of flow.
- The flow gauge on DE8 documented 148 consecutive days of flow.

Stream hydrology data is presented in Appendix D, gauge locations can be found on Figures 2a-c, and
photos are in Appendix A.

1.5.3 Stream Geomorphology
Geomorphology data collection for MY1 was collected on November 8th, 2023. Summary tables and cross
section plots are in Appendix C. Overall, the MY1 cross sections relatively match the proposed design and
as-built condition. MY1 conditions show that shear stress and velocities have been reduced for all
restoration reaches. All reaches were designed as gravel bed channels and remain classified as gravel bed
channels post-construction.

Visual assessment of the stream channel was performed to document signs of instability, such as eroding
banks, structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. The channel is transporting sediment as designed
and will continue to be monitored for aggradation and degradation (Appendix C). RES noted significant
aquatic and/or wetland vegetation throughout much of the stream channels. Since construction of the
stream, abnormally dry conditions have persisted while floodplain herbaceous vegetation has thrived. This
combination has led to favorable conditions for in-channel vegetation to also thrive. RES feels that with
adequate precipitation and future, flushing flows will alleviate some of the issue. However, RES will continue
to monitor the situation and report the condition and propose remedial action, if necessary, in MY2.

Six Runs Mitigation Project 8 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Project #100170 February 2024

1.5.4 Wetland Hydrology
Six wetland gauges were installed in wetland re-establishment areas; two were installed in wetland
enhancement areas; two were installed in wetland rehabilitation areas; and one was installed in a wetland
preservation area to serve as references. These gauges were installed on March 28th, 2023.

Data recorded in MY1 demonstrates consecutive hydroperiods ranging from two to 58 percent across all
wetland gauges onsite. Only three of 11 wetland gauges met the 12 percent hydroperiod. GW3, GW4,
GW5, GW7, and GW9 fell short of the 12 percent success criteria with hydroperiods ranging from two to
seven percent. None of the wetland gauges in re-establishment areas passed while one in a rehabilitation
area also did not pass. Unfortunately, there is no data to be reported for GW1, GW2, or GW11 for various
reasons. GW1 appeared to be in working condition, but the data files retrieved are corrupt or there was
some other malfunction with the pressure transducer data logger. RES is attempting to see if any lost data
can be retrieved but will replace the transducer regardless. The transducer in GW2 had died prior to
downloading. This wetland gauge has been in place for several years as it was in place to document pre-
existing conditions. However, the transducer was replaced on November 8th, 2023. RES discovered the
transducer in GW11 to be missing, likely from an animal or trespasser. It was also replaced on November
8th, 2023.

Though MY1 data presents generally underwhelming hydroperiods, RES does not believe this will be a trend
in future years under normal rainfall conditions. The combination of two consecutive years of abnormally
dry climate resulting in depressed water tables across the landscape as well as post-construction ground
disturbance, has surely affected wetland hydrology. Further, according to the licensed soil scientists’ hydric
soil report for the Project, it is reasonable to expect lower hydroperiods in the first year:

For the first year after construction, it may be practical to expect a hydroperiod of less than 12 percent
if rainfall patterns are below normal as deep soil becomes saturated and a higher groundwater table
becomes established.

RES will continue to monitor wetland hydrology and will also take note of establishing hydrophytic
vegetation to supplement wetland data in future monitoring reports.

Wetland gauge locations can be found in Figures 2a-c.

Soil characterization forms, recorded for each groundwater well, can be found in the MY0 Baseline
Monitoring Report, Appendix D.

It also appears that extensively more wetland area is being restored and/or created in the riparian areas
along Brad’s Branch above where mitigation credit is currently being generated. RES plans to investigate
these areas further in 2024 and may opt to install additional wetland gauges to document hydrology to
determine potential viability for wetland mitigation.

Six Runs Mitigation Project 9 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Project #100170 February 2024

2 References
Griffith, G.E., J.M.Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H.McNab, D.R.Lenat, T.F.MacPherson, J.B.
Glover, and V.B. Shelburne. (2002). “Ecoregions of North Carolina and South Carolina.” (color
Poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia, U.S.
Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,500,000).

Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. “CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation Level.” Version 4.2

North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). “Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities 2010.
Amended August 2018.”

Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. (1998). “A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure.” Castanea 63:262-274

Resource Environmental Solutions (2022). “Six Runs Final Mitigation Plan”.

Resource Environmental Solutions (2023). “Final (MY0) Baseline Monitoring Report”. Six Runs Stream and
Wetland Mitigation Project”.

US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (2016). “Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory
Mitigation Update.” NC: Interagency Review Team (IRT).
Appendix A
Visual Assessment Data
Cartographer: mdeangelo | POC: JRM | Path: R:\Resgis\entgis\Projects\103205_Six_Runs\PRO\6_MonitoringMaintenance\MY0\CCPV_MY0_SixRuns\CCPV_MY0_SixRuns.aprx | Layout: Figure 1 - Project Vicinity - Six Runs | Date Exported: 6/29/2023
www.res.us
Reference:This information is not to be used as final
legal boundaries.
Data Source: USGS, GoogleMaps
Spatial Reference:
NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200
­
N
0 1,000500
Feet
1 in = 1,000 ft
when printed at 8.5x11"Six Runs
Sampson County, North Carolina
78.2361°W 35.0952°N
Figure 1
Project Vicinity
Six Runs Project Easement
Cape Fear River Basin - 03030006
NC 14-Digit HUC - 03030006110010
Cartographer: mdeangelo | POC: JRM | Path: R:\Resgis\Projects\NC\103205_Six_Runs\PRO\6_MonitoringMaintenance\MY1\CCPV_MY1_SixRuns\CCPV_MY1_SixRuns.aprx | Layout: Figure 2a - CCPV MY1 2023 - Six Runs
www.res.us
Reference: This information is not to be used as final
legal boundaries.
Imagery Source: Google
Spatial Reference:
NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet
Date Exported: 12/22/2023
­
N
0 310155
Feet
1 in = 300 ft
when printed at 11x17"
Six Runs
Sampson County, North Carolina
78.2361°W 35.0952°N
Figure 2a
Current Conditions Plan View
MY1 2023..
.
.
.>
>
>
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
??
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
DDDDDD
DDDD
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
DDDDDD
D
D
D D D D D D D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D D D D D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
DDD
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D D D D
D
D
D D D D D
D D D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
WE-1
WE-2
WC-2
WL
WM
WC-1
WD
WB
WA
WF WKWJ
WI
WE-2
WH
WE-1
DE2
-
B
DE7
DE3
MT
2
DE
8
DE2
-
A
B
B
-
B
DE
4
-
A
B
B
-
B
D
E
4
-
B
BB-A
DE4
-
B
BB-C
BB-C
Vegetation Plots
MY1 Fixed: >320 stems/ac.
MY1 Random: >320 stems/
ac.
MY1 Random: <320 stems/
ac.
MY0 Random Vegetation
Plot
Cross section
>Stage Recorder
.Flow Gauge
Wetland Gauges
?>12% Hydroperiod
?5-11% Hydroperiod
?<5% Hydroperiod
?No Data
Recorded Easement (30.94
ac.)
Wetland Approach
Re-establishment
Rehabilitation (1.5)
Enhancement (High) (2)
Enhancment (Low) (5)
Preservation (10)
No Credit
Stream Approach
Restoration
Enhancement I (1.5)
Enhancement II (2.5)
Enhancement II (5)
No Credit
Stream Structures
As-built Top of Bank
D Fencing
AbsentMarginalPresent
Absent
Present
Target Community
In
v
a
s
i
v
e

S
p
e
c
i
e
s
Vegetation Condition Assessment
Cartographer: mdeangelo | POC: JRM | Path: R:\Resgis\Projects\NC\103205_Six_Runs\PRO\6_MonitoringMaintenance\MY1\CCPV_MY1_SixRuns\CCPV_MY1_SixRuns.aprx | Layout: Figure 2b - CCPV MY1 2023 - Six Runs
www.res.us
Reference: This information is not to be used as final
legal boundaries.
Imagery Source: Google
Spatial Reference:
NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet
Date Exported: 12/22/2023
­
N
0 15075
Feet
1 in = 150 ft
when printed at 11x17"
Six Runs
Sampson County, North Carolina
78.2325°W 35.097°N
Figure 2b
Current Conditions Plan View
MY1 2023
..
.
.
.
>
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
DDDDDD
D
DDD
D
DDDDDD
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
DDDDDDD
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
DD
D
D
D
D
D
WB
WA
WF
WK
WJWI
WH DE2
-
B
DE7
BB-C
DE3
MT2
DE
8
DE2
-
A
BB
-
B
B
B
-
B
BB-A
BB-C
FG_MT2 FG_BB-A
FG_DE7
FG_DE2-B
FG_DE8
SR_BB-C_US
RVP-1
RVP-2
RVP-3
VP-3
VP-2
VP-1
VP-4
VP-5
XS-3
XS-4
X
S
-
1
X
S
-
2
XS-27
XS-31
XS-32
XS-15
XS-9
XS
-
1
3
XS-5
XS-1
4
XS
-
1
0
XS-7
X
S
-
8
XS-30
XS-6
XS
-
2
9
XS
-
2
8
X
S
-
1
6
XS-1
1
XS
-
1
2
Vegetation Plots
MY1 Fixed: >320 stems/ac.
MY1 Random: >320 stems/
ac.
MY1 Random: <320 stems/
ac.
MY0 Random Vegetation
Plot
Cross section
>Stage Recorder
.Flow Gauge
Wetland Gauges
?>12% Hydroperiod
?5-11% Hydroperiod
?<5% Hydroperiod
?No Data
Recorded Easement (30.94
ac.)
Wetland Approach
Re-establishment
Rehabilitation (1.5)
Enhancement (High) (2)
Enhancment (Low) (5)
Preservation (10)
No Credit
Pre-existing Top of Bank
Stream Approach
Restoration
Enhancement I (1.5)
Enhancement II (2.5)
Enhancement II (5)
No Credit
Stream Structures
As-built Top of Bank
D Fencing
AbsentMarginalPresent
Absent
Present
Target Community
In
v
a
s
i
v
e

S
p
e
c
i
e
s
Vegetation Condition Assessment
Cartographer: mdeangelo | POC: JRM | Path: R:\Resgis\Projects\NC\103205_Six_Runs\PRO\6_MonitoringMaintenance\MY1\CCPV_MY1_SixRuns\CCPV_MY1_SixRuns.aprx | Layout: Figure 2c - CCPV MY1 2023 - Six Runs
www.res.us
Reference: This information is not to be used as final
legal boundaries.
Imagery Source: Google
Spatial Reference:
NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet
Date Exported: 12/22/2023
­
N
0 200100
Feet
1 in = 200 ft
when printed at 11x17"
Six Runs
Sampson County, North Carolina
78.2394°W 35.094°N
Figure 2c
Current Conditions Plan View
MY1 2023
>
>
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
??
D
D
D
D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D D D
D
D D D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
DDD
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
DDDDD
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D D D D D D
D
D
D
D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D
D D D D D D
D D D D D D
D
D D
WE-1
WE-2
WC-2
WL
WM
WC-1
WD
WF
WI
WE-2
WE-1
DE4
-
A
BB-C
D
E
4
-
B
DE
4
-
B
BB-C
SR_DE4-B
SR_BB-C_DS
GW11
GW1
GW2
GW4
GW3
GW5
GW6
GW7
GW8
GW10
GW9
RVP-4
RVP-6
RVP-5
VP-6
VP-7
VP-8
VP-9
VP-10
VP-11
VP-12
VP-5
VP-13
XS
-
3
5
X
S
-
1
7
X
S
-
2
0
XS
-
2
2
X
S
-
2
3
XS-21
XS-
3
6
XS-18
XS-19
X
S
-
2
5
XS-
2
6
X
S
-
3
3
XS-24
X
S
-
1
6
XS-34
Vegetation Plots
MY1 Fixed: >320 stems/ac.
MY1 Random: >320 stems/
ac.
MY1 Random: <320 stems/
ac.
MY0 Random Vegetation
Plot
Cross section
>Stage Recorder
.Flow Gauge
Wetland Gauges
?>12% Hydroperiod
?5-11% Hydroperiod
?<5% Hydroperiod
?No Data
Recorded Easement (30.94
ac.)
Wetland Approach
Re-establishment
Rehabilitation (1.5)
Enhancement (High) (2)
Enhancment (Low) (5)
Preservation (10)
No Credit
Pre-existing Top of Bank
Stream Approach
Restoration
Enhancement I (1.5)
Enhancement II (2.5)
Enhancement II (5)
No Credit
Stream Structures
As-built Top of Bank
D Fencing
AbsentMarginalPresent
Absent
Present
Target Community
In
v
a
s
i
v
e

S
p
e
c
i
e
s
Vegetation Condition Assessment
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Assessment
Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach BB-A
Assessed Stream Length 452
Assessed Bank Length 904
Bank Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or surface scour 0 100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0 100%
Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse 0 100%
0 100%
Structure Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill. 3 3 100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring
guidance document)
3 3 100%

Totals
Major Channel Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Assessment
Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach BB-B
Assessed Stream Length 562
Assessed Bank Length 1124
Bank Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or surface scour 0 100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0 100%
Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse 0 100%
0 100%
Structure Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill. 8 8 100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring
guidance document)
7 7 100%

Totals
Major Channel Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Assessment
Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach BB-C
Assessed Stream Length 4357
Assessed Bank Length 8714
Bank Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or surface scour 0 100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0 100%
Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse 0 100%
0 100%
Structure Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill. 21 21 100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring
guidance document)
58 58 100%

Totals
Major Channel Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Assessment
Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach MT2
Assessed Stream Length 110
Assessed Bank Length 220
Bank Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or surface scour 0 100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0 100%
Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse 0 100%
0 100%
Structure Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill. 0 0 N/A
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring
guidance document)
0 0 N/A

Totals
Major Channel Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Assessment
Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach DE7
Assessed Stream Length 112
Assessed Bank Length 224
Bank Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or surface scour 0 100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0 100%
Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse 0 100%
0 100%
Structure Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill. 6 6 100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring
guidance document)
3 3 100%

Totals
Major Channel Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Assessment
Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach DE2-A
Assessed Stream Length 231
Assessed Bank Length 462
Bank Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or surface scour 0 100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0 100%
Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse 0 100%
0 100%
Structure Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill. 0 0 N/A
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring
guidance document)
0 0 N/A

Totals
Major Channel Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Assessment
Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach DE2-B
Assessed Stream Length 156
Assessed Bank Length 312
Bank Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or surface scour 0 100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0 100%
Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse 0 100%
0 100%
Structure Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill. 3 3 100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring
guidance document)
2 2 100%

Totals
Major Channel Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Assessment
Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach DE8
Assessed Stream Length 171
Assessed Bank Length 342
Bank Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or surface scour 0 100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0 100%
Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse 0 100%
0 100%
Structure Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill. 3 3 100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring
guidance document)
4 4 100%

Totals
Major Channel Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Assessment
Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach DE4-A
Assessed Stream Length 301
Assessed Bank Length 602
Bank Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or surface scour 0 100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0 100%
Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse 0 100%
0 100%
Structure Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill. 0 0 N/A
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring
guidance document)
0 0 N/A

Totals
Major Channel Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Assessment
Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach DE4-B
Assessed Stream Length 992
Assessed Bank Length 1984
Bank Surface Scour/Bare
Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or surface scour 0 100%
Toe Erosion
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely. Does
NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
0 100%
Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical - rotational, slumping, calving, or collapse 0 100%
0 100%
Structure Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill. 7 7 100%
Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring
guidance document)
15 15 100%

Totals
Major Channel Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Visual Vegetation Assessment
Planted acreage 26.19
Bare Areas Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.0.1 acres 0.00 0.0%
Low Stem Density Areas*Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on current MY stem count criteria.0.1 acres 0.00 0.0%
Areas of Poor Growth Rates Planted areas where average height is not meeting current MY Performance Standard.0.25 acres 0.00 0.0%
0.0%
Easement Acreage 30.94
Invasive Areas of Concern
Invasives may occur outside of planted areas and within the easement and will therefore be calculated
against the total easement acreage. Include species with the potential to directly outcompete native,
young, woody stems in the short-term or community structure for existing communities. Species included
in summation above should be identified in report summary.
1000 SF 0.00 0.0%
Easement Encroachment Areas
Encroachment may be point,line,or polygon.Encroachment to be mapped consists of any violation of
restrictions specified in the conservation easement.Common encroachments are mowing,cattle access,
vehicular access.Encroachment has no threshold value as will need to be addressed regardless of impact
area.
none N/A
Combined
Acreage
% of
Easement
AcreageVegetation Category Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
% of Planted
Acreage
Total
Cumulative Total
Vegetation Category Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
Combined
Acreage
Six Runs Vegetation Plot Photos (MY1)

Vegetation Plot 01 (11/8/2023) Vegetation Plot 02 (11/8/2023)
Vegetation Plot 03 (11/8/2023) Vegetation Plot 04 (11/8/2023)

Vegetation Plot 05 (11/8/2023)
Vegetation Plot 06 (11/7/2023)
Vegetation Plot 07 (11/7/2023)
Vegetation Plot 08 (11/7/2023)

Vegetation Plot 09 (11/7/2023) Vegetation Plot 10 (11/7/2023)
Vegetation Plot 11 (11/7/2023) Vegetation Plot 12 (11/7/2023)

Vegetation Plot 13 (11/7/2023) Random Vegetation Plot 01 (11/8/2023)
Random Vegetation Plot 02 (11/8/2023) Random Vegetation Plot 03 (11/8/2023)

Random Vegetation Plot 04 (11/7/2023) Random Vegetation Plot 05 (11/7/2023)
Random Vegetation Plot 06 (11/7/2023)

Six Runs Crossings (MY1)

BB-B - E Darden Rd. Culvert Entrance - (11/7/2023) BB-C – E Darden Rd. Culvert Exit (11/7/2023)
BB-C - Farm Culvert Entrance - (11/8/2023) BB-C - Farm Culvert Exit - (11/8/2023)

DE4-B – Farm Culvert Entrance - (11/8/2023) DE4-B – Farm Culvert Exit - (11/8/2023)

Six Runs Monitoring Device Photos (MY1)

Flow Gauge MT2 (Looking Upstream) (11/7/2023) Flow Gauge BB-A (Looking Upstream) (11/7/2023)

Flow Gauge DE7 (Looking Upstream) (11/7/2023)

Stage Recorder BB-C_US (Looking Upstream) (11/7/2023) Flow Gauge DE2-B (Looking Upstream) (11/7/2023)
Flow Gauge DE8 (Looking Upstream) (11/7/2023) Stage Recorder DE4-B (Looking Downstream) (11/8/2023)

Stage Recorder BB-C_DS (Looking Upstream) (11/8/2023) GW-01 (11/7/2023)
GW-02 (11/7/2023)
GW-03 (11/7/2023)

GW-04 (11/7/2023) GW-05 (11/7/2023)
GW-06 (11/7/2023) GW-07 (11/7/2023)

GW-08 (11/7/2023) GW-09 (11/7/2023)
GW-10 (11/7/2023) GW-11 (11/8/2023)

Appendix B
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Six Runs As-Built Planting Lists

Zone 1-A & B (Wetlands and Floodplains)
Bare Roots
Common Name Scientific Name Percent
Composition QTY
Bald cypress Taxodium distichum 10% 1,700
Swamp tupelo Nyssa biflora 10% 1,700
Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis 10% 1,700
Overcup oak Quercus lyrata 10% 1,700
River birch Betula nigra 10% 1,700
Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia 5% 900
Water hickory Carya aquatica 5% 900
Hazel alder Alnus serrulata 5% 900
Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5% 850
American sycamore Platanus occidentalis 5% 850
American elm Ulmus American 5% 850
Swamp chestnut oak Quercus michauxii 5% 900
Willow oak Quercus phellos 5% 900
Wax myrtle Morella cerifera 5% 850
Total Bare Roots 16,400
Containerized (Zone 1-B Only)
Bald cypress Taxodium distichum 24% 70
Swamp tupelo Nyssa biflora 24% 70
Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis 24% 70
Overcup oak Quercus lyrata 28% 80
Total Containerized 290
Live Stakes (Zone 1-B Only)
Black willow Salix nigra 66% 1,200
Hazel alder Alnus serrulata 17% 300
Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis 17% 300
Total Live Stakes 1,800

Zone 2 (Uplands and Slopes)
Bare Roots
Common Name Scientific Name Percent
Composition QTY
Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5% 250
American sycamore Platanus occidentalis 5% 250
American elm Ulmus American 5% 250
Swamp chestnut oak Quercus michauxii 10% 500
Willow oak Quercus phellos 10% 500
Wax myrtle Morella cerifera 5% 250
American hornbeam Carpinus caroliniana 10% 500
Water oak Quercus nigra 10% 500
White oak Quercus alba 15% 800
Northern red oak Quercus rubra 15% 800
Yellow poplar Liriodendron tulipifera 10% 500
Total Bare Roots 5,100
Stream Bank Live Staking
Live Stakes
Common Name Scientific Name Percent
Composition QTY
Black Willow Salix nigra 40% 3,450
Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis 30% 2,600
Silky Dogwood Cornus amomum 30% 2,600
Total Live Stakes 8,650
26.19
2023‐03‐02
NA 
2023‐03‐02 
2023‐03‐02
0.0247
Veg Plot 1 R Veg Plot 2 R Veg Plot 3 R Veg Plot 4 R Veg Plot 5 R Veg Plot 6 R
Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Total Total Total Total Total Total
Alnus serrulata hazel alder Tree FACW 5511 33 2244 4411
Betula nigra river birch Tree FACW 111122 22223322 111144 3
Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam Tree FAC 1 1 1 1 1
Carya aquatica water hickory Tree OBL 2222 331111 2222 1122
Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub OBL 1111 2211 112211 4 21
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub FACW 2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree FACW 111155 11 1111 322
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree FACU 3106
Morella cerifera wax myrtle Tree FAC 1 1 1144 11 21
Nyssa aquatica water tupelo Tree OBL 11
Nyssa biflora swamp tupelo Tree OBL 44 1111 11
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree FACW 113311 22 33 1134 2
Quercus laurifolia laurel oak Tree FACW 2233 11 1111 1
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree OBL 1122 11332211225522 241
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree FACW 1 1 22 44 2
Quercus nigra water oak Tree FAC 1 1 1 1 311
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree FACW 55 11 1111 223 12
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree FACU 1111 112
Salix nigra black willow Tree OBL 22 22 22221 2 2
Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree OBL 2 2 113344443344 22 13
Ulmus americana American elm Tree FAC 1144 11 11 1111
Sum Performance Standard 14 14 16 16 11 11 13 13 15 15 16 16 16 16 16 16 12 12 16 16 8 8 16 16 20 20 24 16 21 10 10 7
14 16 11 13 15 16 16 16 12 16 8 16 20 24 16 21 10 10 7
567 648 445 526 607 648 648 648 486 648 324 648 810 972 567 850 405 405 283
911746787611581010411554
36 19 36 38 33 25 25 25 33 19 25 31 20 17 62 29 30 40 43
2221222233232222223
0000000000000000000
14 16 11 13 15 16 16 16 12 16 8 16 20 24 16 21 10 10 7
567 648 445 526 607 648 648 648 486 648 324 648 810 972 567 850 405 405 283
911746787611581010411554
36 19 36 38 33 25 25 25 33 19 25 31 20 17 62 29 30 40 43
2221222233232222223
0000000000000000000
Planted Acreage
Date of Initial Plant
Date(s) of Supplemental Plant(s)
Date(s) Mowing
Date of Current Survey
Plot size (ACRES)
Scientific Name Common Name Tree/S
hrub
Veg Plot 10 F Veg Plot 11 F Veg Plot 12 F Veg Plot 13 FVeg Plot 5 F Veg Plot 6 F Veg Plot 7 F Veg Plot 8 F Veg Plot 9 FIndicator 
Status
Veg Plot 1 F Veg Plot 2 F Veg Plot 3 F Veg Plot 4 F
1). Bolded species are proposed for the current monitoring year, italicized species are not approved, and a regular font indicates that the species has been approved.
2). The "Species Included in Approved Mitigation Plan" section contains only those species that were included in the original approved mitigation plan. The "Post Mitigation Plan Species" section includes species that are being proposed through a mitigation plan addendum for the current monitoring year (bolded) , species that have been approved in prior monitoring years through a mitigation plan addendum (regular font), and species that are not approved (italicized).
3). The "Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" section is derived only from stems included in the original mitigation plan, whereas the "Post Mitigation Plan Performance Standard" includes data from mitigation plan approved, post mitigation plan approved, and proposed stems.
Species 
Included in 
Approved 
Mitigation Plan
Mitigation Plan 
Performance 
Standard
Post Mitigation 
Plan 
Performance 
Standard
Current Year Stem Count
Current Year Stem Count
Stems/Acre
Stems/Acre
Species Count
Species Count
Dominant Species Composition (%)
Dominant Species Composition (%)
Average Plot Height (ft.)
Average Plot Height (ft.)
% Invasives
% Invasives
Table 8. Vegetation Plot Data
Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives
567 2 9 0 648 2 11 0 445 2 7 0
607 0 10 0 729 0 12 0 607 0 7 0
Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives
526 1 4 0 607 2 6 0 648 2 7 0
810 0 8 0 688 0 6 0 729 1 7 0
Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives
648 2 8 0 648 2 7 0 486 3 6 0
891 0 10 0 810 0 10 0 688 0 8 0
Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives
648 3 11 0 324 2 5 0 648 3 8 0
810 0 13 0 648 1 10 0 688 1 9 0
Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives
810 2 10 0 972 2 10 0 567 2 4 0
1012 0 10 0
Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives
850 2 11 0 405 2 5 0 405 2 5 0
Stems/Ac. Av. Ht. (ft) # Species % Invasives
283 3 4 0
*Each monitoring year represents a different plot for the random vegetation plot "groups". Random plots are denoted with an R, and fixed plots with an F.
Veg Plot Group 4 R Veg Plot Group 5 R
Veg Plot Group 6 R
Veg Plot 11 F Veg Plot 12 F
Veg Plot 13 F Veg Plot Group 1 R Veg Plot Group 2 R
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
Veg Plot 1 F
Veg Plot 4 F
Veg Plot 7 F
Veg Plot 10 F
Veg Plot Group 3 R
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 0
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Vegetation Performance Standards Summary Table
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0
Veg Plot 2 F Veg Plot 3 F
Veg Plot 5 F Veg Plot 6 F
Veg Plot 8 F Veg Plot 9 F
Table 9. Vegetation Plot Summary
Appendix C
Stream Morphology Data
Parameter
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width (ft)5.4 7.2 7.2 9.0 2 ‐‐‐9.5 1
Floodprone Width (ft)6.5 12.0 12.0 17.5 2 ‐‐‐>29.9 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.7 1.0 1.0 1.2 2 ‐‐‐0.8 1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1 1.4 1.4 1.7 2 ‐‐‐1.3 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)6.3 6.4 6.4 6.4 2 ‐‐‐8.0 1
Width/Depth Ratio 4.6 8.7 8.7 12.7 2 ‐‐‐11.3 1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.2 1.6 1.6 2.0 2 ‐‐‐>3.1 1
Bank Height Ratio 1.3 1.6 1.6 1.9 2 ‐‐‐1.0 1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
 Other
Pre‐Existing Condition (applicable)Monitoring Baseline (MY0)Design
‐‐‐1.04 ‐‐‐
‐‐‐C4/5 ‐‐‐
Table 10: Baseline Stream Data Summary 
Six Runs BB‐A
Parameter
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width (ft)5.3 1 ‐‐‐9.4 10.8 2
Floodprone Width (ft)8.6 1 ‐‐‐>27.6 >30.2 2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.1 1 ‐‐‐2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.3 1 ‐‐‐1.1 1.8 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)5.7 1 ‐‐‐7.8 12.2 2
Width/Depth Ratio 4.8 1 ‐‐‐2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.6 1 ‐‐‐>2.8 >2.9 2
Bank Height Ratio 1.9 1 ‐‐‐1.0 1.0 2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
 Other
1.10 ‐‐‐‐‐‐
G4/5c ‐‐‐‐‐‐
Table 10: Baseline Stream Data Summary 
Six Runs BB‐B
Pre‐Existing Condition (applicable)Design Monitoring Baseline (MY0)
Parameter
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width (ft)7.3 10.1 8.9 15.2
4 11.8 8.5 12.7
10
Floodprone Width (ft)9.8 14.4 10.8 26.4
4 >50 >29 >29
10
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.0 1.2 1.2 1.4
4 1.1 0.7 1.3
10
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.3 1.5 1.5 1.9
4 1.6 1.1 2.0
10
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)8.3 11.8 10.4 18.0
4 13.0 6.4 15.3
10
Width/Depth Ratio 5.3 8.7 8.4 12.9
4 10.7 9.5 14.0
10
Entrenchment Ratio 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.7
4 >2.2 >2.4 >2.4
10
Bank Height Ratio 1.7 2.7 2.1 5.0
4 1.0 1.0 1.0
10
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
 Other
Table 10: Baseline Stream Data Summary 
Six Runs BB‐C
Pre‐Existing Condition (applicable)Design Monitoring Baseline (MY0)
G4/5c to F4/5 C4/E4 C4/E4
1.12 ‐ 1.26 1.15 ‐ 1.17 1.15 ‐ 1.17
Parameter
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width (ft)2.8 1 3.8 4.9 1
Floodprone Width (ft)>15 1 >20 >30.1 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.4 1 0.4 0.4 1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.6 1 0.5 0.8 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1.2 1 1.4 1.8
1
Width/Depth Ratio 6.4 1 10.7 12.9 1
Entrenchment Ratio >2.2 1 >2.2 >6.2 1
Bank Height Ratio 1.5 1 1.0 1.0 1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
 Other
Table 10: Baseline Stream Data Summary 
Six Runs DE2‐B
Pre‐Existing Condition (applicable)Design Monitoring Baseline (MY0)
E5 C4b C4b
1.07 1.12 1.12
Parameter
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width (ft)6.0 1 10.3 10.1 10.1 2
Floodprone Width (ft)9.6 1 >50 >29.7 >30.1 2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.0 1 1.0 1 1.1 2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.4 1 1.5 1.4 1.7 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)6.3 1 10.4
10.3 10.8 2
Width/Depth Ratio 5.8 1 10.3
9.4 11.4 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.6 1 >2.2
>2.8 >2.9 2
Bank Height Ratio 1.7 1 1.0 1 1.0 2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
 Other
Table 10: Baseline Stream Data Summary 
Six Runs DE4‐B
Pre‐Existing Condition (applicable)Design Monitoring Baseline (MY0)
G4/5c to F4/4/5 C4/E4 C4/E4
1.27 1.18 1.18
Parameter
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width (ft)3.2 1 3.5 4.3 1
Floodprone Width (ft)4.2 1 >15 >29.5 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.3 1 0.4 0.5 1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.5 1 0.5 0.8 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)0.9 1 1.3 2.1
1
Width/Depth Ratio 11.6 1 9.8 8.4 1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 1 >2.2 >6.9 1
Bank Height Ratio 2.9 1 1.0 1.0 1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
 Other
Table 10: Baseline Stream Data Summary 
Six Runs DE7
Pre‐Existing Condition (applicable)Design Monitoring Baseline (MY0)
G5c B4a to E4 B4a to E4
1.01 1.05 1.05
Parameter
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width (ft)5.5 1 4.5 3.9 1
Floodprone Width (ft)8.5 1 >20 >29.9 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.3 1 0.4 0.3 1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.6 1 0.6 0.6 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1.8 1 1.8 1.3
1
Width/Depth Ratio 17.0 1 11.3 11.6 1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.5 1 >2.2 >7.6 1
Bank Height Ratio 3.5 1 1.0 1.0 1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
 Other
Table 10: Baseline Stream Data Summary 
Six Runs DE8
Pre‐Existing Condition (applicable)Design Monitoring Baseline (MY0)
F5b C4/E4 C4/E4
1.11 1.14 1.14
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) ‐ Based on AB‐Bankfull1 Area 148.22 148.25 148.04 148.01 144.23 144.28 144.13 144.14 142.18 142.18
Bank Height Ratio ‐ Based on AB Bankfull1 Area 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95
Thalweg Elevation 146.95 147.00 145.23 145.26 142.41 142.37 140.94 141.07 141.06 141.06
LTOB2 Elevation 148.22 148.17 148.04 147.99 144.23 144.22 144.13 144.03 142.18 142.13
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)1.27 1.17 2.81 2.73 1.82 1.85 3.19 2.96 1.12 1.07
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)8.00 7.30 11.70 11.60 12.20 11.50 17.20 16.10 7.80 7.30
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) ‐ Based on AB‐Bankfull1 Area 141.96 141.89 136.98 136.90 136.71 136.67 133.71 133.74 133.31 133.29
Bank Height Ratio ‐ Based on AB Bankfull1 Area 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.94
Thalweg Elevation 140.45 140.31 135.58 135.52 134.49 134.35 132.60 132.55 130.70 130.55
LTOB2 Elevation 141.96 141.88 136.98 136.90 136.71 136.71 133.70 133.67 133.31 132.96
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)1.51 1.57 1.40 1.38 2.22 2.36 1.10 1.12 2.61 2.41
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)9.10 8.90 7.70 7.70 10.70 11.10 6.40 5.80 12.20 9.30
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) ‐ Based on AB‐Bankfull1 Area 130.27 130.27 129.79 129.88 126.77 126.67 126.29 126.32 123.45 123.52
Bank Height Ratio ‐ Based on AB Bankfull1 Area 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.93
Thalweg Elevation 128.99 129.02 127.65 127.96 124.66 124.39 125.12 125.17 122.11 122.26
LTOB2 Elevation 130.27 130.25 129.79 129.81 126.77 126.72 126.29 126.26 123.45 123.43
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)1.28 1.23 2.14 1.85 2.11 2.33 1.17 1.09 1.34 1.17
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)6.90 6.70 8.60 8.10 11.90 12.40 7.10 6.50 7.50 6.70
Note: The smaller the channel the closer the survey measurements are to their limit of reliable detection, therefore inter‐annual variation in morphological measurement (as a percentage) is by default magnified as channel size decereases.  Some of the variability above is the result of this factor and some is due to the large amount of depositional sediments observed.      
Cross Section 6 (Pool ‐ BB‐B)Cross Section 7 (Riffle ‐ BB‐C)Cross Section 8 (Pool ‐ BB‐C)Cross Section 9 (Riffle ‐ BB‐C)Cross Section 10 (Pool BB‐C)
Cross Section 11 (Riffle ‐ BB‐C)Cross Section 12 (Pool ‐ BB‐C)Cross Section 13 (Pool ‐ BB‐C)Cross Section 14 (Riffle ‐ BB‐C)Cross Section 15 (Riffle ‐ BB‐C)
  Monitoring Data ‐ Cross Section Morphology Monitoring Summary
Six Runs Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project / DMS:100170   Reaches: BB‐A, BB‐B, BB‐C
Cross Section 1 (Riffle ‐ BB‐A)Cross Section 2 (Pool ‐ BB‐A)Cross Section 3 (Riffle ‐ BB‐B)Cross Section 4 (Pool ‐ BB‐B)Cross Section 5 (Riffle ‐ BB‐B)
Table 11. Morphology Table
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) ‐ Based on AB‐Bankfull1 Area 123.34 123.44 119.65 119.64 119.76 119.75 117.02 117.08 116.74 116.85
Bank Height Ratio ‐ Based on AB Bankfull1 Area 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.03
Thalweg Elevation 120.67 121.08 117.18 117.15 118.29 118.17 115.47 115.56 114.07 114.26
LTOB2 Elevation 123.34 123.37 119.65 119.49 119.76 119.71 117.02 117.12 116.74 116.36
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)2.67 2.28 2.47 2.34 1.47 1.54 1.55 1.57 2.67 2.10
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)15.00 13.80 11.80 10.40 9.60 9.10 9.20 9.70 13.40 8.50
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) ‐ Based on AB‐Bankfull1 Area 115.12 115.12 114.46 114.46 112.47 112.46 112.61 112.56 110.45 110.44
Bank Height Ratio ‐ Based on AB Bankfull1 Area 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 1.00 1.06
Thalweg Elevation 113.17 113.13 111.51 111.50 109.60 109.60 110.64 110.78 108.65 108.58
LTOB2 Elevation 115.12 115.11 114.46 114.42 112.47 112.85 112.61 112.57 110.45 110.54
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)1.95 1.99 2.95 2.92 2.87 3.25 1.97 1.79 1.80 1.96
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)15.30 15.10 20.80 20.30 17.10 22.20 13.60 13.80 12.20 13.50
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) ‐ Based on AB‐Bankfull1 Area 110.39 110.55 137.08 136.65 134.62 134.55 128.81 128.80 128.31 128.26
Bank Height Ratio ‐ Based on AB Bankfull1 Area 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.80
Thalweg Elevation 107.53 107.78 135.46 135.11 133.80 133.76 127.82 127.88 127.48 127.52
LTOB2 Elevation 110.39 110.55 137.08 137.03 134.62 134.49 128.81 128.77 128.31 128.11
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)2.86 2.77 1.62 1.93 0.82 0.73 0.99 0.90 0.83 0.59
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)23.40 23.40 4.30 6.00 2.10 1.70 1.80 1.60 1.80 1.10
Note: The smaller the channel the closer the survey measurements are to their limit of reliable detection, therefore inter‐annual variation in morphological measurement (as a percentage) is by default magnified as channel size decereases.  Some of the variability above is the result of this factor and some is due to the large amount of depositional sediments observed.    
Cross Section 21 (Riffle ‐ BB‐C)Cross Section 22 (Pool ‐ BB‐C)Cross Section 23 (Pool ‐ BB‐C)Cross Section 24 (Riffle ‐ BB‐C)Cross Section 25 (Riffle ‐ BB‐C)
Cross Section 26 (Pool ‐ BB‐C)Cross Section 27 (Pool ‐ DE7)Cross Section 28 (Riffle ‐ DE7)Cross Section 29 (Pool ‐ DE2‐B)Cross Section 30 (Riffle ‐ DE2‐B)
  Monitoring Data ‐ Cross Section Morphology Monitoring Summary
Six Runs Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project / DMS:100170   Reaches: BB‐C, DE7, DE2‐B
Cross Section 16 (Pool ‐ BB‐C)Cross Section 17 (Pool ‐ BB‐C)Cross Section 18 (Riffle ‐ BB‐C)Cross Section 19 (Riffle ‐ BB‐C)Cross Section 20 (Pool ‐ BB‐C)
Table 11. Morphology Table
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) ‐ Based on AB‐Bankfull1 Area 125.71 125.16 125.05 125.08 119.09 119.20 118.53 118.52 116.71 116.74
Bank Height Ratio ‐ Based on AB Bankfull1 Area 1.00 1.13 1.00 0.81 1.00 0.96
Thalweg Elevation 124.18 124.13 124.46 124.47 117.65 117.83 115.99 116.07 115.02 115.04
LTOB2 Elevation 125.71 125.24 125.05 125.16 119.09 118.94 118.53 118.52 116.71 116.67
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)1.53 1.11 0.59 0.69 1.44 1.11 2.54 2.45 1.69 1.63
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2.40 2.80 1.30 1.70 10.30 7.40 14.60 14.70 10.80 10.00
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) ‐ Based on AB‐Bankfull1 Area 115.86 115.95
Bank Height Ratio ‐ Based on AB Bankfull1 Area
Thalweg Elevation 113.76 113.98
LTOB2 Elevation 115.86 115.80
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)2.10 1.82
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)9.80 8.40
Cross Section 36 (Pool ‐ DE4‐B)
Note: The smaller the channel the closer the survey measurements are to their limit of reliable detection, therefore inter‐annual variation in morphological measurement (as a percentage) is by default magnified as channel size decereases.  Some of the variability above is the result of this factor and some is due to the large amount of depositional sediments observed.    
  Monitoring Data ‐ Cross Section Morphology Monitoring Summary
Six Runs Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project / DMS:100170   Reach: DE8, DE4‐B
Cross Section 31 (Pool ‐ DE8)Cross Section 32 (Riffle ‐ DE8)Cross Section 33 (Riffle ‐ DE4‐B)Cross Section 34 (Pool ‐ DE4‐B)Cross Section 35 (Riffle ‐ DE4‐B)
Table 11. Morphology Table
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
036912151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-A - Cross Section 1 -Riffle - Enhancement I
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull Elevation (ft) ‐ Based on AB‐Bankfull1 Area
Bank Height Ratio ‐ Based on AB Bankfull1 Area
Thalweg Elevation
LTOB2 Elevation
LTOB2 Max Depth (ft)
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
148.22 148.25
1.00 0.94
146.95 147.00
148.22 148.17
1.27 1.17
8.00 7.30
Cross Section 1 (Riffle ‐ BB‐A)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
036912151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-A - Cross Section 2 -Pool - Enhancement I
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg Elevation
LTOB 2 Elevation
LTOB 2 Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2 Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
148.04 148.01
145.23 145.26
148.04 147.99
2.81 2.73
11.70 11.60
Cross Section 2 (Pool ‐ BB‐A)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-B - Cross Section 3 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
144.23 144.28
1.00 0.97
142.41 142.37  
144.23 144.22
1.82 1.85
12.20 11.50
Cross Section 3 (Riffle  ‐ BB ‐B)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
036912151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-B - Cross Section 4 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0MY1MY2MY3MY5MY7MY+
144.13 144.14
140.94 141.07
144.13 144.03
3.19 2.96
17.20 16.10
Cross Section  4 (Pool ‐ BB ‐B)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-B - Cross Section 5 -Riffle - Enhancement I
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0MY1MY2MY3MY5MY7MY+
142.18 142.18
1.00 0.95
141.06 141.06
142.18 142.13
1.12 1.07
7.80 7.30
Cross  Section  5 (Riffle  ‐ BB ‐B)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
036912151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-B - Cross Section 6 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg Elevation
LTOB 2 Elevation
LTOB 2 Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2 Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
141.96 141.89
140.45 140.31
141.96 141.88
1.51 1.57
9.10 8.90
Cross Section  6 (Pool ‐ BB‐B)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-C - Cross Section 7 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
136.98 136.90
1.00 1.00
135.58 135.52
136.98 136.90
1.40 1.38
7.70 7.70
Cross  Section  7 (Riffle  ‐ BB ‐C)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-C - Cross Section 8 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
136.71 136.67
134.49 134.35
136.71 136.71
2.22 2.36
10.70 11.10
Cross Section  8 (Pool  ‐ BB‐C)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-C - Cross Section 9 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
133.71 133.74
0.99 0.94
132.60 132.55
133.70 133.67
1.10 1.12
6.40 5.80
Cross Section  9 (Riffle  ‐ BB‐C)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-C - Cross Section 10 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
133.31 133.29
130.70 130.55
133.31 132.96
2.61 2.41
12.20 9.30
Cross Section  10  (Pool  BB ‐C)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-C - Cross Section 11 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
130.27 130.27
1.00 0.98
128.99 129.02
130.27 130.25
1.28 1.23
6.90 6.70
Cross Section  11  (Riffle  ‐ BB‐C)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-C - Cross Section 12 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
129.79 129.88
127.65 127.96
129.79 129.81
2.14 1.85
8.60 8.10
Cross Section  12  (Pool ‐ BB ‐C)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-C - Cross Section 13 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
126.77 126.67
124.66 124.39
126.77 126.72
2.11 2.33
11.90 12.40
Cross Section 13 (Pool ‐ BB‐C)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-C - Cross Section 14 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
126.29 126.32
1.00 0.95
125.12 125.17
126.29 126.26
1.17 1.09
7.10 6.50
Cross Section  14 (Riffle  ‐ BB‐C)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-C - Cross Section 15 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
123.45 123.52
1.00 0.93
122.11 122.26
123.45 123.43
1.34 1.17
7.50 6.70
Cross Section  15 (Riffle  ‐ BB‐C)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-C - Cross Section 16 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
123.34 123.44
120.67 121.08
123.34 123.37
2.67 2.28
15.00 13.80
Cross Section  16 (Pool  ‐ BB‐C)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-C - Cross Section 17 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
119.65 119.64
117.18 117.15
119.65 119.49
2.47 2.34
11.80 10.40
Cross  Section  17  (Pool  ‐ BB ‐C)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-C - Cross Section 18 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
119.76 119.75
1.00 0.98
118.29 118.17  
119.76 119.71
1.47 1.54
9.60 9.10
Cross  Section  18  (Riffle  ‐ BB ‐C)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-C - Cross Section 19 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
117.02 117.08
1.00 1.03
115.47 115.56
117.02 117.12
1.55 1.57
9.20 9.70
Cross Section  19  (Riffle  ‐ BB ‐C)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-C - Cross Section 20 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
116.74 116.85
114.07 114.26
116.74 116.36
2.67 2.10
13.40 8.50
Cross  Section  20  (Pool  ‐ BB ‐C)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-C - Cross Section 21 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
115.12 115.12
1.00 1.00
113.17 113.13
115.12 115.11
1.95 1.99
15.30 15.10
Cross Section  21  (Riffle  ‐ BB ‐C)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-C - Cross Section 22 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
114.46 114.46
111.51 111.50
114.46 114.42
2.95 2.92
20.80 20.30
Cross  Section  22  (Pool  ‐ BB ‐C)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-C - Cross Section 23 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
112.47 112.46
109.60 109.60
112.47 112.85
2.87 3.25
17.10 22.20
Cross  Section  23  (Pool  ‐ BB ‐C)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-C - Cross Section 24 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
112.61 112.56
1.00 1.01
110.64 110.78
112.61 112.57
1.97 1.79
13.60 13.80
Cross Section  24  (Riffle  ‐ BB ‐C)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-C - Cross Section 25 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
110.45 110.44
1.00 1.06
108.65 108.58
110.45 110.54
1.80 1.96
12.20 13.50
Cross Section  25  (Riffle  ‐ BB ‐C)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach BB-C - Cross Section 26 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
110.39 110.55
107.53 107.78
110.39 110.55
2.86 2.77
23.40 23.40
Cross  Section  26  (Pool  ‐ BB ‐C)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach DE7 - Cross Section 27 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
137.08 136.65
135.46 135.11
137.08 137.03
1.62 1.93
4.30 6.00
Cross  Section  27  (Pool  ‐ DE7)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach DE7 - Cross Section 28 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
134.62 134.55
1.00 0.92
133.80 133.76
134.62 134.49
0.82 0.73
2.10 1.70
Cross  Section  28  (Riffle  ‐ DE7)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach DE2-B - Cross Section 29 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
128.81 128.80
127.82 127.88
128.81 128.77
0.99 0.90
1.80 1.60
Cross Section  29  (Pool  ‐ DE2 ‐B)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach DE2-B - Cross Section 30 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
128.31 128.26
1.00 0.80
127.48 127.52
128.31 128.11
0.83 0.59
1.80 1.10
Cross  Section  30  (Riffle  ‐ DE2 ‐B)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach DE8 - Cross Section 31 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
125.71 125.16
124.18 124.13
125.71 125.24
1.53 1.11
2.40 2.80
Cross  Section  31  (Pool  ‐ DE8)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach DE8 - Cross Section 32 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
125.05 125.08
1.00 1.13
124.46 124.47
125.05 125.16
0.59 0.69
1.30 1.70
Cross  Section  32  (Riffle  ‐ DE8)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach DE4-B - Cross Section 33 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
119.09 119.20
1.00 0.81
117.65 117.83  
119.09 118.94
1.44 1.11
10.30 7.40
Cross  Section  33  (Riffle  ‐ DE4 ‐B)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach DE4-B - Cross Section 34 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
118.53 118.52
115.99 116.07
118.53 118.52
2.54 2.45
14.60 14.70
Cross Section  34  (Pool  ‐ DE4 ‐B)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach DE4-B - Cross Section 35 -Riffle - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
116.71 116.74
1.00 0.96
115.02 115.04
116.71 116.67
1.69 1.63
10.80 10.00
Cross  Section  35  (Riffle  ‐ DE4 ‐B)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
0 3 6 9 12151821242730
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Six Runs -Reach DE4-B - Cross Section 36 -Pool - Restoration
MY0 2023 MY1 2023 Approx. Bankfull Low Bank Elevation
2X Vertical Exaggeration
Bankfull  Elevation  (ft) ‐ Based  on  AB ‐Bankfull 1  Area
Bank  Height Ratio  ‐ Based  on  AB  Bankfull 1  Area
Thalweg  Elevation
LTOB 2  Elevation
LTOB 2  Max  Depth  (ft)
LTOB 2  Cross  Sectional  Area  (ft2 )
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
115.86 115.95
113.76 113.98
115.86 115.80
2.10 1.82
9.80 8.40
Cross Section  36  (Pool  ‐ DE4 ‐B)
Appendix D
Hydrologic Data
Table 12. 2023 Rainfall Summary

30 Percent 70 Percent
January 3.65 2.49 4.36 3.81
February 3.28 2.20 3.93 3.56
March 3.52 2.48 4.17 2.55
April 3.34 2.15 4.02 4.51
May 4.05 2.71 4.84 2.40
June 4.83 3.36 5.74 4.57
July 5.82 4.39 6.79 9.66
August 5.55 3.97 6.56 7.31
September 6.49 3.60 7.92 4.22
October 3.32 1.87 4.04 1.27
November 3.28 1.85 3.99 4.13
December 3.38 2.26 4.05 -
Total Annual **50.50 45.96 55.11 47.98
Above Normal
Limits
Below Normal
Limits
Month Average Normal Limits Project Location
Precipitation*
WETS Station: Clinton, NC. Approximately 16 miles from the site.
*Project Location Precipitation is a location-weighted average of surrounding gauged data retrieved by the
USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool. Gauges used include Clinton 1.5 NE, Clinton 2 NE, Clinton 4.5 SSE,
Clinton 5.8 SW, Clinton 10.6 N, Garland 4 SW, Mount Olive 2.4 SW, Newton Grove 2.6 SSE, Smithfield,
Wallace 1 SE, and Warsaw 5 E.
**Total Annual represents the average total precipitation, annually, as calculated by the 30-year period.
Table 13. Documentation of Geomorphically Significant Flow Events

Year Bankfull
Events
Maximum Height
Over Bankfull (ft)
MY1 2023 3 0.67
MY1 2023 4 0.49
MY1 2023 5 0.91
Year Flow
Events
Maximum
Consecutive Flow
Days
Cummlative Flow
Days
Highest Consecutive
Flow Range
MY1 2023 7 71 123 8/28/23 - 11/7/23
MY1 2023 2 142 214 3/30/23 - 8/19/23
MY1 2023 1 222 222 3/30/23 - 11/7/23
MY1 2023 2 148 217 3/30/23 - 8/23/23
MY1 2023 5 18 30 3/30/23 - 4/17/23
Flow Gauge DE2-B
Flow Gauge DE7
Flow Gauge DE8
Flow Gauge MT2
Stage Recorder DE4-B
Estimated Date of Highest Event
8/31/2023
8/31/2023
8/31/2023
Flow Gauge BB-A
Stage Recorder BB-C US
Stage Recorder BB-C DS
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
St
a
g
e

(
f
t
)
Date
Six Runs MY1 BB-C DS Stage Recorder Graph
Daily Precip (in)SR BB-C DS Top of Bank
Max Event ‐0.67 ft. above TOB
8/31/2023
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
St
a
g
e

(
f
t
)
Date
Six Runs MY1 BB-C US Stage Recorder Graph
Daily Precip (in)SR BB-C US Top of Bank
Max Event ‐0.49 ft. above TOB
8/31/2023
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
(i
n
)
St
a
g
e

(
f
t
)
Date
Six Runs MY1 DE4-B Stage Recorder Graph
Daily Precip (in)SR DE4-B Top of Bank
Max Event ‐0.91 ft. above TOB   
8/31/2023
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
St
a
g
e

(
f
t
)
Date
Six Runs MY1 BB-A Flow Gauge Graph
Daily Precip (in)FG BB-A Downstream Riffle Elevation
71 Days of Consecutive Flow
8/28/2023 ‐11/7/2023
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
St
a
g
e

(
f
t
)
Date
Six Runs MY1 DE2-B Flow Gauge Graph
Daily Precip (in)FG DE2-B Downstream Riffle Elevation
142 Days of Consecutive Flow
3/30/2023 ‐8/19/2023
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
St
a
g
e

(
f
t
)
Date
Six Runs MY1 DE7 Flow Gauge Graph
Daily Precip (in)FG DE7 Downstream Riffle Elevation
222 Days of Consecutive Flow
3/30/2023 ‐11/7/2023
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
St
a
g
e

(
f
t
)
Date
Six Runs MY1 DE8 Flow Gauge Graph
Daily Precip (in)FG DE8 Downstream Riffle Elevation
146 Days of Consecutive Flow
3/30/2023 ‐8/23/2023
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
St
a
g
e

(
f
t
)
Date
Six Runs MY1 MT2 Flow Gauge Graph
Daily Precip (in)FG MT2 Downstream Riffle Elevation
18 Days of Consecutive Flow
3/30/2023 ‐4/17/2023
Table 14.
2023 Max Hydroperiod (Growing Season 14-Mar through 22-Nov, 253 days)
Success criteria: ≥12% growing season hydroperiod
Well
ID
Consecutive Cumulative
Occurrences

Days Hydroperiod (%) Days Hydroperiod
(%)
GW1* - - - - -
GW2* - - - - -
GW3 18 7 61 24 13
GW4 5 2 29 11 9
GW5 5 2 39 15 12
GW6 36 14 79 31 9
GW7 8 3 46 18 11
GW8 71 28 201 79 8
GW9 19 7 89 35 16
GW10 149 58 221 87 2
GW11* - - - - -
*No data was collected in MY1. Refer to report for explanation.

Table 15.
Summary of Groundwater Monitoring Results
Six Runs
Success criteria: ≥12% growing season hydroperiod
Well ID Wetland
ID Approach
Hydroperiod (%)
Year 1
(2023)
Year 2
(2024)
Year 3
(2025)
Year
4
(2026)
Year 5
(2027)
Year 6
(2028)
Year
7
(2029)
GW1* WM Re-establishment -
GW2* WE-2 Enhancement (High) -
GW3 WL Re-establishment 7
GW4 WL Re-establishment 2
GW5 WL Re-establishment 2
GW6 WL Rehabilitation 14
GW7 WL Re-establishment 3
GW8 WC-1 Rehabilitation 28
GW9 WC-1 Rehabilitation 7
GW10 WC-2 Preservation 58
GW11* WE-1 Enhancement (Low) -
*No data was collected in MY1. Refer to report for explanation.
<5% 5-12% >12%

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
Six Runs MY1 GW1
Daily Precip (in)GW1 Growing Season Start Growing Season End Logger Depth
No Data ‐Refer to Report
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
Six Runs MY1 GW2
Daily Precip (in)GW2 Growing Season Start Growing Season End Logger Depth
No Data ‐Refer to Report
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
Six Runs MY1 GW3
Daily Precip (in)GW3 Growing Season Start Growing Season End Logger Depth
18 Consecutive Days of Hydrology (7%)
3/30/2023 ‐4/17/2023
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
Six Runs MY1 GW4
Daily Precip (in)GW4 Growing Season Start Growing Season End Logger Depth
5 Consecutive Days of Hydrology (2%)
4/8/2023 ‐4/13/2023
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
Six Runs MY1 GW5
Daily Precip (in)GW5 Growing Season Start Growing Season End Logger Depth
5 Consecutive Days of Hydrology (2%)
4/28/2023 ‐5/2/2023
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
Six Runs MY1 GW6
Daily Precip (in)GW6 Growing Season Start Growing Season End Logger Depth
36 Consecutive Days of Hydrology (14%)
3/30/2023 ‐5/4/2023
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
Six Runs MY1 GW7
Daily Precip (in)GW7 Growing Season Start Growing Season End Logger Depth
8 Consecutive Days of Hydrology (3%)
9/23/2023 ‐9/30/2023
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
Six Runs MY1 GW8
Daily Precip (in)GW8 Growing Season Start Growing Season End Logger Depth
71 Consecutive Days of Hydrology (28%)
8/28/2023 ‐11/7/2023
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
Six Runs MY1 GW9
Daily Precip (in)GW9 Growing Season Start Growing Season End Logger Depth
19 Consecutive Days of Hydrology (7%)
3/30/2023 ‐4/17/2023
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
Six Runs MY1 GW10
Daily Precip (in)GW10 Growing Season Start Growing Season End Logger Depth
149 Consecutive Days of Hydrology (59%)
3/30/2023 ‐8/25/2023
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
Six Runs MY1 GW11
Daily Precip (in)GW11 Growing Season Start Growing Season End Logger Depth
No Data ‐Refer to Report
Appendix E
Project Timeline and
Contact Information
Data Collection Task Completion or
Activity or Deliverable Complete Deliverable Submission
Project Instituted NA Oct‐20
Mitigation Plan Approved NA Jul‐22
Construction (Grading) Completed NA Mar‐23
Planting Completed NA Mar‐23
As‐built Survey Completed NA Aug‐23
MY‐0 Baseline Report XS Monitoring ‐ 3/30/2023
VP Monitoring ‐ 3/23/2023 Aug‐23
MY‐1 Report XS Monitoring ‐ 11/8/2023
VP Monitoring ‐ 11/8/2023 Dec‐23

Project Name/Number 
Provider RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave., Suite 100, 
Raleigh, NC 27612
Mitigation Provider POC Jamey Mceachran (919) 623‐9889
Designer RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave., Suite 100, 
Raleigh, NC 27612
Primary project design POC Frasier Mullen, PE (919) 412‐3866
Construction Contractor RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave., Suite 100, 
Raleigh, NC 27612
Construction contractor POC Daniel Burnette
Table 4. Project Timeline and Contact Information