260072_Routine Inspection_20240226

Date of Visit: t Arrival Time: UOd9H7 Departure Time: County: 1 t� Region: r_eo
Farm Name: 7"Im
Owner Name: 7r) ro
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: V f�
Certified Operator: /
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator: 7 01in
Certification Number: / L=/
Certification Number: A)/' �/5"
Longitude:
'
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
0 oD a
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
I§
I
=jyi1
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
o2
i
��
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
jBeef Stocker
E Gilts
Non -Layers
113cef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
4i Mti
Turke PoultsOtheryt1�I
Mi"Illili,111101
1
:YI
7lil ➢H I
It4it ,. aS uS a a
l�
DischarMs and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes LEI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: g6 - Date of Inspection: 2& tz
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ,�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: J
Spillway?: f
Designed Freeboard (in): ` �J
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes E�JlNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes E3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes -E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes EJ'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes „❑"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes _12No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Er No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable CropWindow
�❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area � 1
12. Crop Type(s): l_ll-e�LGc� /.aGrr�+ �c�G G .tea �F�� 2� ?� �d ��- � �Gt Ytiel / tt �r� ��a j,
13. Soil Type(s): 4U
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes 4fTNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ]lNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes Q-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes [2-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes f:;]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes -[]-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes In -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard [:]Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes -E],No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes _��No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facifi Number: - -%y- 1 jDate of Inspection: (�
a-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes Eno
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
[—]Yes ,®`No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge
levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List date first indicating
structure(s) and of survey non-compliance: J�i2�/�>/✓1^
(
o! 36�
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ❑'Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes F,--ITo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes ❑I�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes - -No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes ..0'Ro
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes .in —No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes „e'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes -ffNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ,Z3'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name: CJ ice /-7 -C GI 'i-1-0Z/s0 /rJ Phone: 0,C) �/J
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: d,/L T''—� Date: �a"f.!'/a !`
Page 3 of 3 511212020

acility No. A `P �7 99�� Time In Time Out
arts Name �m 0076 integrattk
weer Site Rep:
Aerator No.
i
Ick-up
- No.
DC Circle: Genera( or NPOES
2EBOA
Observed , ?2�_
np Yield
in Gauge
if Test /O�
Wettable
Acres
:eklp Freeboard -_V,
Daily Rainfall t/
ray/Freeboard Drop
gather Codes
120 min Inspections
Waste Analysts:
Date
Nitrogen (N)
7 /�
aiuuge purvey
Dart
Calibration/GPM /
Waste Transfers
Rain Breaker
PLAT
1-in Inspections_
Date Nitrogen (N)
31 a 9,3 /, y7
i