20240313 Ver 1_Trent_River_PJD_Package_full_210205_20240221

City of New Bern Drainage Repairs
Trent River Drainage Basin
Nationwide Permit Application
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Package

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue, Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 919-696-3045
February 5, 2021
Emily Thompson
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, NC 27889
RE: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination package, New Bern, Trent River drainage basin
Dear Emily,
On behalf of the City of New Bern, Axiom is happy to provide the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) with the attached Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) package
for the Trent River drainage basin in New Bern, NC. Jurisdictional area delineations were
conducted from early June through July 2020. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
WETS tables data indicates that precipitation was within or above normal for this time.
The Trent River basin encompasses a highly developed portion of New Bern. Residential
development dominates the basin, with a corridor of commercial development generally centered
along Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. Elevations within the basin range from a high of
approximately 38 feet (North American Vertical Datum of 1988 [NAVD 88]) along the
northwest boundary of the basin to a low of approximately -1 feet NAVD 88 at the outfall of
Lawson Creek.
Please find attached to this letter the following items:
• USACE Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions,
• USACE FINALSAW-JD-REQUEST-FORM-20170508
• USACE PJD-fillable-form 2016-11
• USACE PJD Aquatic Resources Table (attachment to the USACE PJD fillable form
2016-11)
• Potential jurisdictional area figures
• Potential jurisdictional area data forms
• Potential jurisdictional area photographs
• Trent River soils summary
• Trent River WETS table data
• City of New Bern/Axiom Environmental Agent Authorization form
All information regarding the current definitions of the Waters of the United States (WOTUS)
are provided in the Federal Register, 33 CFR 328.3 and 40 CFR 120.2, The Navigable Waters
Protection Rule: Definition of "Waters of the United States. A Rule by the Engineers Corps and
the Environmental Protection Agency on 0412112020, " and available at:

https://www.federalre_ig ster.gov/documents/202O/O4/2l/2O2O-02500/the-navigable-waters-protec
tion-rule-definition-of-waters-of-the-united-states.
No Traditional Navigable Waters (TNWs) are located within the project area of the Trent River
basin. The discussion within the Federal Register regarding TNWs (and Territorial Seas) is
available at: https://www.federalre ig ster.gov/d/2020-02500/p-290.
Tributaries to TNWs are defined as linear features that exhibit either intermittent or perennial
flow. The flow regime of tributaries to TNWs are documented with the North Carolina Stream
Identification Forms version 4.11 (and the associated documentation, Methodology for
Identification oflntermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins), and stream quality is
documented using USACE Stream Quality Assessment Forms. The flow regime of each
tributary is identified on mapping as intermittent (i) or perennial (p).
Adjacent wetlands (Discussion in Federal Register at https://www.federalre_ig ster.gov/d/ 2020-
02500/p-460). Jurisdictional wetlands are identified by characteristic hydrology, soils, and
hydrophytic vegetation and are flagged in the field with sequentially numbered flagging to
facilitate review (except in maintained areas where flags are subject to damage or removal). All
areas exhibiting jurisdictional wetland criteria have been included; wetlands have not been
separated into adjacent and isolated categories.
Most project features are ditches that were created to drain the local urban and residential
infrastructure. The flow regimes of project ditches were rated using the Methodology for
Identification oflntermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins. Ditches that demonstrate
geomorphic, hydrologic, and biologic indicators representative of tributaries are identified on
mapping as intermittent (i) or perennial (p). Ditches with less than intermittent flow may support
the hydrology, soils, and hydrophytic vegetation characteristic of jurisdictional wetlands.
Ditches that do not support jurisdictional wetlands or a flow regime characteristic of tributaries
are depicted as potential non -wetland waters when an Ordinary High Water Mark is present.
Soils data extracted from the NRCS digital data for Craven County indicates that soils within the
Trent River basin include soil series characteristic of riparian and non -riparian landscapes.
Several stream features are depicted throughout the basin (Figure 4).
The hydrography depicted on Figure 5 of the PJD package indicates several streams generated by
the NC Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) Headwater Stream Spatial Dataset
(HSSD) program and incorporated into the latest version of the Advancing Transportation
through Linkages, Automation, and Screening (ATLAS) hydrography dataset. HSSD streams
are generated using a range of environmental data, primarily Digital Elevation Model derivatives
(i.e. elevation, slope, curvature), and field -located data points to perform a regression analysis of
likely stream origin points. It should also be noted that current HSSD/ATLAS hydrography is
generated from Legacy Light Distance and Ranging (LiDAR) data (collected during or near 2005
with a grid size of 20 feet). This is significant as small and/or flat landscape features are
occasionally misrepresented at this scale. The stormwater infrastructure in urban areas (and
dominating the Trent River drainage basin) can also cause misrepresentations in the hydrography
model.

Figures 7 and 7A through 7M depict additional regulatory jurisdictions: in this case, areas
subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules regulated by the NC Division of Water
Resources (NCDWR) and areas subject to Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA) rules under
the jurisdiction of the NC Division of Coastal Resources (NCDCM). Features subject to Neuse
River Riparian Buffer Rules consist of intermittent or perennial streams (tributaries) that are
depicted on the US Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle and/or on
NRCS Soil Survey mapping. Areas subject to NCDCM jurisdiction were verified on -site by Mr.
Brad Connell of the NCDCM during a field visit on August 11, 2020.
Figures 8 and 8A through 8M of the attached PJD package depict the activities and locations of
FEMA-defined Category A and Category D work where they occur in or adjacent to
jurisdictional features. Category A work consists of the removal of accumulated sediment and
debris within ditches and stream channels. The removal of vegetative and miscellaneous debris
(including trash, white goods, construction debris, and other non -natural introduced items) is
anticipated to occur as a non -regulated activity that does not require permitting. Accumulated
sediment removal is anticipated to be Exempt from Section 404 permitting as maintenance to
existing drainage ditches. Sediment will be removed to the extent of the original ditch geometry.
Ditches will not be deepened or widened. Category D work consists of maintenance and repairs
to structures and slopes. Damaged structures and slopes that require the addition of rip rap or
similar hardened structure are anticipated to be permitted under USACE Nationwide Permitting
(NWP3, Maintenance and/or NWP13 Bank Stabilization) and NCDCM General Permitting
where appropriate. Currently, the locations of Category D activities have been identified;
however, potential impact have not been quantified. It is anticipated that some areas identified
as potential Bank Stabilization activities may not intersect the associated OHWM and therefore
will not be subject to Section 404 permitting. In these cases, these activities will be removed
from the catalog of permitted activities and a request will be submitted to add them to the
inventory of non -regulated activities.
The City of New Bern would like to request approval for activities that may be performed with
No Permit Required (both Exempt and Non -regulated activities) and anticipates referencing this
PJD package for upcoming permitting projects.

Please let us know if you have any questions about the information within this package. We are
happy to discuss any items by phone, email, or in the field, and can provide additional
photographs, data forms, or figures that you may need. We look forward to working with you
further on this project.
Sincerely,
Scott Davis
Senior Scientist/Project Manager

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID 9: SAW -
Prepare file folder ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]:
Begin Date (Date Received):
Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑Institutional ❑✓ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
The City of New Bern has proposed to remove sediment and debris from ditches/stream channels as well repair culverts and stabilize
ditch/stream banks that were damaged by Hurricane Florence.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: City of New Bern, Matt Montanye, Director of Public
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Axiom Environmental, c/o Scott Davis
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location —Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
New Bern - Trent River (35.099208,-77.075218)
8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: N/A
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Craven
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: New Bern
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Neuse River Estuary
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03020204
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit 9
Regional General Permit 9
L✓J Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers
WUmington Distria
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www. saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re"latoiyPermitPro aam/Contact/CounlyLocator.gWx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: City of New Bern
City, State:
County:
New Bern, NC
Craven
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Axiom Environmental, c/o Scott Davis
Mailing Address: 218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Telephone Number: 919-696-3045
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: City of New Bern- Matt Montanye, Dire
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1 129
New Bern, NC 28563
Telephone Number: 252-639-7501
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Must provide completed Agent Authorization Fonn/Letter.
Docinnentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Matt Montanye, Director of Public Works, City of New Bern
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
✓❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑✓ Other:
s For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/IJSACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 89.57 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.099208
Longitude:-77.075218
zA legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 1 lx 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.gM.mil/Missions/Regulatoiy-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forma
W1 Vicinity Map
zAerial Photograph
z USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
zOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
zLandscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
�J Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.i!M.mil/Portals/59/docs/reaulatoryy/readocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App A Prelim JD_ Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see hLtp://www.saw.usace.i!M.mil/Missions/Reaulatoly-Permit-Proaram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approvedjurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Scott Davis, Axiom Environmental; 218 Snow Avenue, Raleigh, NC27603
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Craven City: New Bern
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.099208 Long.:-77.075218
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Neuse River Estuary
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
Please
see
attached
table

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
Vicinity, Aerial photography, LiDAR, Soils, Hydrography, Potential jurisdictional areas, additional areas assessed.
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Askin (1983), New Bern (1988) 24k quads.
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: web Soil Survey (current), SS of craven county (1989)
❑ National wetlands Inventory map(s). Cite name: NC statewide wetlands, NWI online (current, accessed May 8, 2020).
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
■❑ Photographs: ■❑ Aerial (Name & Date): 2016 NC OneMap Imagery
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Digitally signed by Scott Davis
Cott Davis Date 2021.02.05112629-05'00'
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

City of New Bern, Trent River drainage basin
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) Form
Table of Aquatic Resources in the review area that "may be" subject to regulatory jurisdiction.
Site number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resource in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section 404
or Section 10 404
Lawson Creek-p
35.095493
-77.079174
7093 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Lawson Creek-i
35.099989
-77.068096
790 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-1p
35.106974
-77.086200
6059 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-1i
35.113385
-77.093445
1507 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-2p
35.110278
-77.084979
903 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-2i
35.111446
-77.084054
440 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-3p
35.101129
-77.080969
220 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-3i
35.101400
-77.081406
951 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-4p
35.098489
-77.065532
914 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-4i
35.097318
-77.068698
1271 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-5p
35.086979
-77.067983
533 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-5i
35.087242
-77.070455
1275 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-5
35.088271
-77.074541
1292 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-6p
35.097195
-77.079688
874 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-7p
35.099630
-77.061486
63 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-8p
35.099924
-77.062270
58 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-9i
35.114365
-77.094191
332 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-10i
35.109241
-77.092974
3474 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-11i
35.111220
-77.097500
32 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-12i
35.109633
-77.094018
166 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-13i
35.109546
-77.089911
380 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-14i
35.107426
-77.088813
1440 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-15i
35.101238
-77.081381
54 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-16i
35.103259
-77.079928
1151 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-17i
35.102762
-77.076279
1264 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-18i
35.101115
-77.073681
648 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-19i
35.101335
-77.072920
56 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-20i
35.101787
-77.071803
611 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-21i
35.102676
-77.071787
228 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-22i
35.094653
-77.083584
965 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-23i
35.094221
-77.080799
353 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-24i
35.100175
-77.061297
105 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-25i
35.107423
-77.090283
19 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-26i
35.086738
-77.068688
267 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-27
35.087539
-77.071844
30 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-28
35.087782
-77.072802
31 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-29
35.088019
-77.073753
34 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-30
35.088424
-77.075357
31 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-31
35.095013
-77.064501
448 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-32
35.094550
-77.064062
28 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-33
35.093638
-77.066482
367 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-34
35.094174
-77.066546
26 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-35
35.094174
-77.066443
33 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-36
35.093212
-77.066483
23 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-37
35.093215
-77.066376
31 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-38
35.098664
-77.063101
293 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404

Site number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resource in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section 404
or Section 10 404
TR-NWW-39
35.096999
-77.069908
27 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-40
35.094043
-77.071457
48 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-41
35.094047
-77.071302
35 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-42
35.101505
-77.065496
28 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-43
35.098994
-77.074295
732 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-44
35.098916
-77.074819
61 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-45
35.094269
-77.079058
441 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-46
35.093183
-77.080326
31 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-47
35.094350
-77.084841
7 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-48
35.098963
-77.076909
33 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-49
35.099589
-77.078752
9 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-50
35.099823
-77.078766
26 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-51
35.101300
-77.084114
327 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-52
35.102941
-77.086376
814 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-53
35.101911
-77.089128
23 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-54
35.102291
-77.076015
90 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-55
35.102388
-77.073693
148 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-56
35.103688
-77.074061
63 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-57
35.102461
-77.072977
127 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-58
35.103174
-77.076660
26 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-59
35.102651
-77.078203
36 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-60
35.103173
-77.079031
38 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-61
35.104740
-77.083087
35 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-62
35.108880
-77.085708
6 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-63
35.110153
-77.087021
60 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-64
35.111134
-77.092027
756 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-65
35.110487
-77.092613
29 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-66
35.112695
-77.094238
552 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-67
35.115048
-77.095359
300 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-68
35.114607
-77.095589
30 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-69
35.119080
-77.097923
546 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-70
35.117788
-77.099240
12 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-71
35.117332
-77.100273
66 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-72
35.118626
-77.100190
29 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-73
35.100502
-77.065761
59 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-74
35.112775
-77.084067
36 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-NWW-75
35.086738
-77.068688
159 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
TR-W1
35.111200
-77.097487
0.002 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W2
35.100311
-77.074489
0.123 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W3
35.099550
-77.070440
0.147 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W4
35.100097
-77.066016
0.180 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W5
35.099908
-77.064367
0.348 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W6
35.099895
-77.062190
0.458 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W7
35.099556
-77.065543
0.085 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W8
35.099593
-77.065387
0.006 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W9
35.098708
-77.058166
0.733 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W10
35.097009
-77.069801
0.003 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W11
35.087223
-77.067576
0.302 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W12
35.097310
-77.079723
0.042 acre
Wetland
Section 404

Site number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resource in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section 404
or Section 10 404
TR-W13
35.087510
-77.071358
0.003 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W14
35.087616
-77.072147
0.002 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W15
35.087704
-77.072472
0.001 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W16
35.094300
-77.060855
0.022 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W17
35.099236
-77.061644
0.005 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W18
35.098431
-77.065495
0.002 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W19
35.094472
-77.071318
0.064 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W20
35.093927
-77.071532
0.002 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W21
35.102065
-77.063000
0.078 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W22
35.101488
-77.064785
0.032 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W23
35.101323
-77.065753
0.015 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W24
35.101465
-77.065430
0.007 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W25
35.101037
-77.067139
0.027 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W26
35.100734
-77.068725
0.002 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W27
35.100718
-77.068826
0.003 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W28
35.100761
-77.068762
0.001 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W29
35.093459
-77.080494
0.046 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W30
35.094682
-77.082335
0.001 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W31
35.094753
-77.084359
0.003 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W32
35.099113
-77.079610
0.024 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W33
35.101367
-77.083429
0.005 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W34
35.101394
-77.084345
0.072 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W35
35.102136
-77.080729
0.004 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W36
35.101967
-77.078151
0.042 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W37
35.102151
-77.076302
0.004 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W38
35.101991
-77.076071
0.002 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W39
35.102497
-77.073360
0.013 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W40
35.104220
-77.080289
0.008 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W41
35.104337
-77.079910
0.018 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W42
35.104290
-77.079588
<0.001 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W43
35.105761
-77.078922
0.013 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W44
35.105556
-77.079358
0.001 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W45
35.102936
-77.092771
0.013 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W46
35.104861
-77.095787
0.008 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W47
35.105225
-77.095806
0.035 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W48
35.105226
-77.095761
0.042 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W49
35.106244
-77.096043
0.001 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W50
35.106809
-77.095937
0.003 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W51
35.105726
-77.087780
0.005 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W52
35.105993
-77.088302
0.020 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W53
35.110085
-77.092870
0.055 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W54
35.108894
-77.089032
0.009 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W55
35.109614
-77.087903
0.023 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W56
35.110874
-77.083317
0.036 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W57
35.110021
-77.081983
0.029 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W58
35.110858
-77.083002
0.067 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W59
35.112778
-77.083875
0.060 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W60
35.111908
-77.084810
0.001 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W61
35.111539
-77.089335
0.031 acre
I Wetland
Section 404

Site number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resource in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section 404
or Section 10 404
TR-W62
35.114381
-77.086743
0.011 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W63
35.117787
-77.099785
0.218 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W64
35.116340
-77.097538
0.107 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W65
35.117374
-77.096697
0.001 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W66
35.117444
-77.099628
0.044 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W67
35.118474
-77.099622
0.017 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W68
35.118234
-77.099056
0.002 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W69
35.117486
-77.091258
0.113 acre
Wetland
Section 404
TR-W70
35.117174
-77.092064
0.032 acre
I Wetland
Section 404
TR-W711
35.118238
-77.0910641
0.043 acre
IWetland
Section 404
TOTALS 43,009 linear feet Non -wetland waters
3.977 acres Wetlands

2
_ _t
�tp
p
�
rn
O
'c
E
W
c R
�< i
F
E> maw
�'" E
7
'S
w
LL
0 6 d'
Q
Z m U
W
o> v v
rn rn
o O
n
LL
c
r
U
F d
ozm=- -_
a`
a`
z m¢ z 'v C7 z 3 m o
Y

zL
wv
m
0]
r? o
ap �
Q
a`
T
C o
k
O
VI
N
�
E
3 o
a
z F
M Sao
Ul
vw
z U mgO
oz _
zm aQ Eas=lo
w moo=
ct - o °
F -aE��
v 'a
S mz p
Z m� n a, U
V,
W
N
L�
z°
0 o
fn a`

0
�
O
L
w gv E
�z v w Boa- -
-o
�Nm 'Qa o�-oz �
¢
�
(3 NZ
E
ow
Lw
o w
Vo
a Z a
3
o .o m
a` a` z m n a` ,ram, U
o
o
—
rn
a`
IY' .. ZoKe��Gt

U q Z C7 0
I� Q L _p m
W
s �. ` c p O 2
E 3 �¢— �? zm d2CL
�Zo
> v Z m N iL E� a �yy� S2
w o� opt W J� a'ADc `o `tea LL
E - K `at+�c PdE"ma
a r UF-
i4
0 O a

U � Z
w
-ALL m �i a °&oE_�d
o Z c Q F� J a �8m EU��`o
> ! LL Zm N ip E o aW?`yJ
�in� w J�
Of
U
w cm$�vm=
E m
mo, 0 A���3
w
LL
Cl)
LL
�i
M.
e
Iti}, a
a
m
E
a
m
3
a n
z
`o
w
V u] i ry d N i N
�7
��11�111�11111
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
M A R n
[N1 M � cmV M N N N
d

■ ;1
■U
, \
�g05,
, ®z ef
!E[ CL
LU ]£
r f /
§or

C
co
3
�
Z _L
•y 'C
1
v
2`
a
m
N O p
0
Lu
QI
fk! m p O
F Q J G.
Z m N m
W J
K (�
F-
our,

Z .0
c Q
WLLI
u ¢r r
m
x z
Z = Q
0-
�B �
_ M
w
i v
W m J
oWCw)
? 9
IL
O
rs:
y
(f
°�- Q =y E E� E-
h
E
a
o p
m
z
a
a
z .020'02
m
0�
a
a
N N �
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
m
9
Z N7
c6 7 7 tv
c..
�"1
d
On
4di11
J
N N tV N [V N
N N N M N N
11111111111117
M M N . O 6� IN iC r
N N 6 O Qi m c0 c0 t0 tC
N N
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
d CC
t M r. ih M
o �! C u] [•� l(l m [per [•� [•� l(CC1 r�
O M M M M (+] M M M C1 (] M M
d
W
a

§ / 7#ya 0 f
3 §}/\((/:!)
2 o f 2zZ iS y§\;
d z=& e 2 =� §k!/7!}!!` $ k
� q£ g!/; 7-2
\ In
\\\\\\\\\\\}\\
/
;
-
\\\)\§\f\§\(\§
\
\

Ei [Y Z pp
O1
y �~` m I N LLI
>_ Q r o Via.. >•�~ n y g W
o Z Q F7 J a ELu
ci
LLl J �'A�c.-a LL
_ d
F_ PEEN=E ?
mo•ko ao.2
r — z—+--a
O
L
a
6i
a
[i N Z �
CL
Oj
00
�ti � c9 d d Oi A
11111111111111 � i,:.e.
ih M
m � n
ry v d ai m of c6 m
N
W a
0
� M M M M M C1 M M M C1 M M ee
W vn —

E
a
z
m
Z= p,
w
LU
ixZvn+��+d�$?o
F co
J CL
a
Qvmd��E
�$CWiIo
ui
a'
a._�^.
a-
� c o
25
n
iA m N
z m
m w - - r
on•,
p
ry Q � N N ry N
M MA M N N N ry N N N
o_ d
•. d m in m �n � in �p �n N �n eerr �n
0
x c
R
y
,b

¥
2 \
E
fji
/zz)g2yif;
Eo 'd
;�|£\:;�;f
�
w
k m
E
}))\
{00
_

w 0 0
f7 o
E2 ON
Z
L p NrnNO
O m �p 0-2
mmoa>o . a s Nrn - rnOCS
Wa i o N wo,-
rnomZME¢a`�morQn�'wNa E wawvoE
mow a 0
07
Li
0ooonIvo
a0 aE v zrNEom"Z �o O 0noz >o O1aw
E mzzo vvwu z
"`vz _or oaa ¢
GV r omm p otovgU6 v'ma w Y7p`o7oDo vo0 o`zmNanCzz (2E¢ zd'. z£fnv mzz;< ww
T N �
In
A
m m E
m x a
E o
o U) 0 tln
m Q Q Q
T
> z 'o
Q 0w F
o w 0 - _ E O
T 0 C C, w C iVil C N N "m0
U U a 05 D z
z
x
top,
o��

c o LL N 'm N C v rnU _ S N.
°z `3
5 R N Z Co U E r
I� C C 0 W `orn -
E '� F y _ a E S E T
o w�Ca
ci 7 : o mz `o ">
L a` z m na,-U a m°°
� o
~ n
I f iik r. F
l
A
0
W
0
LL
0 o fn a`

2
d
w
LW
ry c,
p0
E
.�
oo
U
Q
a`
C
a`
\44
to
N T�
-
w
W w -
Z m0 a__ _
FQ w O o,oz� `_ �Oz `3
Z Co O; M r - v ' c
W _ cc occ a -
F N v E(9 c � E `m
v �aU-6
v o R o w
>
Z M a na -- U a m u u
V �
E o
ol
3'it 0 o
$
z E
F
o 15
T .O N N N N 2� N
o
C N
ra° a° a° a° LL o
z a

y � o
c o'W
c C Op K W m a0 U Er LL
w r d' - o o w ..
E(9m SET n z
w�Ca
C 7 : o rnz � > -
a` a` z m'N n L ,ro, U - m o o 0 o rn a`

y � o
-
�'
o � w W
S z z R y ~ Q
C 0p K W Co a0 U Er LL
E r d' - o o w ..
E '� F y _a E(9m SET n z
o w�pa
C 7 v o rnz � > -
a` a` z m'N n L ,ro, U - m o o D o m a`
_ 96
. � f
` 4
�
M
�11 ,lI�'t�O�
.. w
�-k":"�3��iati�1�....mR'�.. •iY.T�'"a
�i�'.�ti.�.i �"��, �•
+s,
Fm
I. . R�..
y ,x
f
JQ R�S.iMan

z L
n -
m
o
GC
w C
2
ay
F
N
3,�
'a
_
vmp„-o
° z ° Z 3
w
Q
z
E r m co) >
o
LL
O
m
W
N
-
E
._
r�
K
Q 7
= °_ v
p Lo
Q
[;
�.O rnZ � >
a
a
Z m n a` £ U
8
5 °�.' 3
3
� 3
o 3 #:
ca
3
E - MEo
E F p
15
T .O C N
L p a
r LL U a` a a a a C, z 'a
J aO 1 E E t p
a
a
m16
- of
=96

L
i
pn 0
h3 m.
_rz
am ��3
LL
Zp]
VI
Eo
r NU
oo,oz
F✓y�
Q
�O
E
a
Y
CC
F
Q j
= ° o
of _E
V
in Ua �r
Q Ulo
o z>
a a
o
Z m n a$ U a m o u
tb�
IQI
0
o
LLJ
W
Lw
z
0 o
fn a`
N
pi
m'
ns
� ¢
d s �n
h9/b
z0
d
d z
S
l/
x
m
3 a �
o
m
� a
° o
mC,m�
...:`...r.
T
oudlJ

CL
�
L
o
ct
0]
c
cu
E
F
Q gU
a`
o
n "o
W C v -
O T
CC No
= F _ moz -r�O-0
Zm -O LP Er - NU
W O - - -
CC Q 7 00_ vo `
F a E U mM. E m
a �U'a 1r
0 o
Z m n a$ U a m u u
W
�
Y
Z
N
0
o
rn
a`
00
m �
� m
=
m z
0
.. o
0 3
3 m
o m= 3�
a
E -0 0o
m
3 ¢ > o
r
>
z � F
-
`off �
n
T O o o = o
N
rn
az az
m
-ZT J
6
Saint j0St
�r#' � � 1*.,�. � .'•::� `� �_. Y-
�Y
u
cn
4 It
e Cnarl�u
7��
�,
�A a • � 1
St
Gill" St �� x
Penn St
IIA
ol
"
+
y � "
PflY. >n 1
Pea
U ��911 y E"i RTM
1�
P s
i
u
soi
4q
�"'• '�:,° i� q � °+ .. ll � �:. ��y� w+N-r #d.. � � a`�� �__WaKe, �� 9t,V' ,�
r
��_:: � ..� <,�, ty •, Well St, �_
`I w t
'17.

-
L
�
i
c
M� w
0]
3 1T i
LL
m d00
L
¢
o U w
a` a`
KLx
E
j f0 t Z U `o a E m -M.00
L
aU _-v
o _ r`v
nwVayaim
_
ZErvo v°jLLIEL 1momzr
Y Ea m 0 v o F m—mo� .a
D`ao Ls-
w-
E
z 7z�N¢�m � >v 10
m
W
C7 co
L-
�x I,
kT-
'a•
"

°
L C �O m W r T f7
fy L Ln
.12 . 50 W W
am€E yra 05
r0- E mvo
i Uo °L WE
Z v vw°maU EMN m m
w
co
c QV r v w e
z v- w >ml
00vw a
0 rZTvwv a'Z
ao
a` "n7`F `m`¢zry>maI oa�
O o
d
.,der
a f �
k
1 E_ i E -vo
0
° `o o.
.3 a
> >
Lf o Z o
4 o o
p O
o w o
Vo
> Zo
0
oo 3 E 5 E
3 ; It
m _
a m �. o, �.
m
a - d E E
V o N O
4 - � 3 W Z d W Z
y — 2 0 m _ Z
o Q Q
o
E E_ E E
° �_ o a s a s
T° o o o o U o o o 0 o
a z a z z a z z
\ �00
M,
®,
OEM,

o
L C C o W r T f7
�./ L C .02 . 50 W -�W m €�E yr Era - 05
�TM: 3 3 07 i Z L m v o a w� '° - v m o r� ° v w
L..� c° ol
aU v m o E¢ m mo_° mw >,= ` o - U
LL z m a� ZQ V Ervr01 avv - Ev> (J 00
CC m 'z> ma�
.+ �'Oa uZ Tviwv a aLL
-
aT+ Q .£ m U y r _ �.� v L a a z
z mrvn"nC7¢ ¢m o >F `mw <zm 'o �`oa5
E oo E o
o M a M
m a m a
aEi o aEi o - `p
'o - 'o
> z > z
o 3 0 5_ 0 5_
E E
0 3 ` `
m x o x o 8
lo w z a w z
3
o z
o
o 3 o Y m m z m m ...- 1:.
o15
---- o oo a a a s
6 6 6 6 U °- o o 6 o o 6
U a` m a m a z m z z m z z m
(o 4� h
�a
'O o Lg9
0 � r
e
m
4 .
Ate.*
0 ;i
Ir
596
w y@:
T �
�`o

L C` O W r T f7
oo
Era o uu
�TM: 3 3 07 i Z L m v o a w� '° - v m o rv w
o ol
aU v m o E¢ m� No° my >, ` o - 00
LL z m a� ZQ V Ervr01 avv - Ev> (J 00
CC m 'z> ma�
.+ �"Oa uZ Tviwv a aLL
-
aT+ Q .£ m U y r _> 151 v m y L a a z°
o
z mrvn"nClo
7¢ ¢m m >F `mw ¢za'v �`oa5
1
Joe
O Q�
q
ffr
OC A
N
m r
rt
'1a
w
e' r,
i
m -
Q 4
n�
b'
t
�LL
E o E d
- - o
`o `o
o ? o
O N o o o
Z `o - `o
0 o
m o, w o, w
m �t
o > o
.� o z o z ,
�'o 3 E 5 E 5
0
� _ ' � � o• ate. o -o � m o, m -- _
I m m m
c
w o 0
s _ g z a w z a
-, o ` z z
� • , v n n- T 'p � •
a° ao ao z a zo zo ao zo zo ao
J �001 •0O1

o
L C O W r T f7
L Ln
12 50 W W
✓ 3aO 0�7 � VV10 amE L v
r0— i vo °L WE
Z v vw°mU MN 0 wEN
w
wcCL
ZmEv w
Z��Ev:-�`� 00vao_
rTvwx v z- .o
mrvn"nC7¢ ¢`� m >F `mw ¢za 1 �`oa5 W o o o a`
E E
— o —
> z >
N O V O
E _ E
Q Q o Q
o d a a d a
T 'p
c� a` m m m m z m z° z° m z°
' OFI"'F' . ® o
ne>
k
I�r

o
o
L C O W r T f7
�./ L Ln
.12 . 50 W W
€ 05
E yar Er
�TM: 3 3 07 i Z L v o a w� '��° - v m o r� ° v w
u Z`
O � m=.E a uv
mv Z E a 25vr 00
W HTwv Z wa .T, Q £ cU wr `mmmym r.o a z°
lw
o E
m"`o o a`n¢`zrvnC¢� m>F`mw11
oa5
­W
O
FQ� w o
C
i
m
F
� a
C
m��
IBM,
FAM,

- �
E
o Z
0]
N 0
Z
l0 N
O
o p
Q o U
a`
o
v-
oo
�
LLJ
-0.o
vrE
o>_
rwv`o
av�EM -
�_ -
W
mo�L
0v
FQ
U
oC7
Er .0
vvw -
az=
EE>
('j 00
W
LLJ
C
Q
�"On uZ
`vzv
u_wv "v _��
10 `m>rn
maV
z
rn10
o -E WZ-oEwov
w3v
�' UV
d
v. w
-
=0'.a
`- 3 E
3 w v m
-
0_
z .Na o (D ¢`
<� m >F `mw
¢z, I
� oa° �!�
o o fn -
rl"FA
Eby' ,.0�" _ •-�e+
m
0
v
o
4
oE
E
o d
E
o o d o
oawoaw
_.
�o
E2F2F
o
w
o
w
o
Z
Z
4
N
E - v
o o 4os
Fo
Zm m z "OP
z -- -- F
T o �
E E
a a
-_ E E -_
a a
O O O O U �-
z z a
o o
z z
O o o O
m z z m
�n
m1F
m16
l'

ZL
w
E
m
'? o
o p �
E
°
Q
}
C
a` a`
U
11
o
N v
a .- €omLLJ vrfr °>_
10
P�� o - - -
�z wr �w� �E"-- - r._o
N a U v aZ M i z E E o ow EL 00
v =
z m Er ��z �a
W C aon uZ u_ww v _��
ow wo
Q `in wzva -m>o, a
a 0-3- > ja -mE m .> o-6 o3.E
d z m ry a n w ¢` ¢� m c> F `m w� ¢ z
E -o E o
O o
o ? ? o
u E o u E
o a
0
oo V a d V E
m 3 m E E
o 3
_ co. w 0 0 z d w z
o 8 Y z
z m F E E_ E E
°15--- o� a a a s
T .O N N N N N N
a° a° a° a° z a z° z° a° z° z°

N
v=
oo
o 0
E
ovv
°" yr
GC' m
m
w
ff
.0
'
L
GC
a�'
�N
c
aLci
rz=b"=
vm v
z Ei0N
m
--w
Y
LL
p
OCmC
z
E r U
a
v
a
00
o
u
�>
a
r
v Z ... m_
> a v E w
� o 2
o v
¢
U
j m
`3_
a`
a`
d
z°mo"(95,
¢mm >F`mwa
¢zaI
oa°�!�
o o m a`
E ° E o
O o -o
- o
a a E
E ° Z E ° Z
t o
w
` v m o o z o z II
a a v m 3 v m 3 4aAAi
aEi v E d
o'
`o o
v w z a w
o
c 3 o ` Z Z '\. \ m m m m F E E m E E m Emerson St
O
o 0 0 o U o m- o 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 V
a a a z a z z a z z a
Golle9e`52_A V1 _ � ` w
0
Saint John '
�1VGpat7es SL
oz
�m
i 16
m1F
ingh

N oo
�o 0
' LnE rzW"yr 0�' m w = b E=d
z`V>pmv -ai-- U avov o ww m r3
v
n a
CLD
0J0vv �m
J o maLL_o
EQm> �as zw m
j a v zv� o E E ow
`ry ¢m ¢z'°��zmv o o n
om
Z'
`o
�? 3: a
0
m
3 o 3
v o
w z
_o
>
a a
O
ao ao ao ao 0 M z a
zo zo C
���Doaa
.v�
-74
l
a
^� J
�� _ p 4, .

f!1 ❑
G ¢ C o m W •p .0 EmEoL-�
>
Z
o —C.^
Z Eza tip aim-- Elm C7 00
ro
w to 00 Wm •C �, �wm �zj ma= lLL
H
S
d
3
c
O
v
c
m
d
3
c d N d N d N d N d N d N d N d N O N d N d N
zd.KQK'
faKdArnO
+�Z'p
da33cmd cdcm
O N O�NQIWOO�
N
Ir
�
�0
�NONNIVZoUd,��Mm_NVZo
0OMW�a�OMWZ
mN-
n°°77
0
Z O N .O 0
0 O N O.O NO O. N N
Nm
ONNrZ O0av =Eo.o o coEo.o .o E0 Eo
6 v o—oro =o —o—o —o——o =o =o
O O O O V O M O 0zOO
IL 'E O 0 NO
0cO c0
oxvEOWWUWW —0 o o0
m m m mmm m m m m m m m m mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmQ
Um MN
OMWMMrZ�rm
mOu2 -- m m m m O d d d d N N d m N N N N N N d N N N m N N N N N N N N N
C w„mm
E` N MrOMN M m M N N M N N N Q N N N MM M N N N N QMOm0o00NO0 00M ON 00 O NOIO QOOE O
m` 0 m Q 0 0 O M O OO O O O O OO O O O OO O OO O OO OO OO
W 00 00 000 0 0 00 0 00 0 0 O 0 o OO OOO O OOOO O O O OO O O 00
mo
E Ir Ir Ir 11! D� fl� tr
0
o
O Z
ZPD
Of Of
z
z
zrcrcw
COcc
dK°
�d�
1
OMMWNWmZo
O(NVV(Zo
)
)
m
ZpaN
EE
°°W°O°O
_
Ee uummmmmmmmm
' �o'o'o' o'afo
'
af
M��QOVAOOvA
N
N
��vp�u

Lawson Creek
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: '� Z% p
Project/Site: T Y A
Latitude: -V,qq�>'1
Evaluator. � �
County: [-Awe1
Longitude: -'�"'7 7-1
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent `�,Si�
Stream Deter 9-l_aAtron--(-Gircle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent) Perennial
other A6W *Ir
if a 19 or rxzrennial if a 30*
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor holo y (Subtotal = &1S ) 1
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
:2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri ole-pool sequence
0
�
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
j "a;
3
5. Activeirelict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
f 0
0.5
1
1,5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1
11. Second or greater order channel
Nq 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = +�- )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
y3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
14. Leaf litter
"
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
; 0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5
"1 ]
_241.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Bioloqv (Subtotal
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
1
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
r
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0)
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
-G.5
- 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1_.5 -other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:rx:
Sketch:

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions
Width:
Height:_
Depth water: d
Natural line impressed on bank
Changes in character of soil
Destruction of terrestrial vegetation
Presence of litter and debris
Vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
Sediment sorting
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away
Deposition
Multiple observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
Change in plant community'
�qj
Z, oa��
m
Site:
Notes
Lawson Creek

USACE AIM
DWQ#
Lawson Creek
Site # (indicate on attached map)
C3 --A,4JP
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under...... —.-+o L�,,
1. Applicant's name: �__ _ _� _. _ 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: • v� l �-� __ 4. Time of evaluation:
---
5. Name of stream: IAW jJ,N ......... 6. River basin: --
7. Approximate drainage
8. Stream order: ? L
9. Length of reach evaluated: w 10. County: (*Y&A
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
A p
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): �S d L __- Longitude (ex.-77.556611):. - . � 7-) VI
Method location determined (circle): GP Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) hoto/ S Other GIS Other_.
13. Location of reach under a alua ' n (note nearby ro and attach map identifying stream(s) location): _
w
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: IV
16. Site conditions at time of visit: 4
VW
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 y Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Z Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of theevaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:_
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map?(9 NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? &M) NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: � V % Residential _% Conwxiciai =-ro ilidusi: ai _ o Agtk uliural
22. Bankfull width:
)0 % Forested % Cleared / Logged _% Other
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): I
24. Channel slope down center of stream: K Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
P
Total Score (from reverse):Comments:
F Evaluator's Signature_ p Date LfJ
This channel evaluation form"is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

Lawson Creek
S-TREAM QUALITY ASSESSMEN-r WORrCtiErEE-r
I,.C"()12F,( "N', 1'()ItiT RA'VG[:
1=
('IIARAC"i ERISTIC`ti
- - -
- --
SC OR1,:
It Coastal
Piedmont
?Mountain
t
Presence elf hors ; persistent pools in stream
t) - 5
0-4
5
I4
kilo tlo\\ or sauration 0. strwlg, tlo\\ lira" paint.)
.
�
2
F.% idence of past human alteration
0 - b
(} - 5
(extensive alteration 0, no alteration max points) j
fJ
Riparian zone I
0• fi
0-4
(1- 5
Z
(no butler 0; contiguous. wide butler - max lxmitst
F\idence of nutrient or chemical discharges
tl_S
Il.a
t)-•t
temensive discharges 0; no diseharge, ° MM puinl.) i
Groundvvater discharge
tart di,char:;r 0; 5pting:s, peeps, \\rtland•, ctL. nut\ points)
0*
r\
Presence of adjacent floodplain
t) d
0 4
0-2
� 1
(no flootlplain - 0 ememsive tloodplain Ilia\ poim')
fi
Entrenchment f tlnndplain access
0- i
t) - 4
0- 21
D
064
(dvepl\ entlenciled 0; frequent llm)dilts-, max points 1
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-0 '
0 4
tt . _'
b
(no \\ctlands t); lute c atljttCent ►+ctlands max points)
t)
Channel sinuosit%
C} ^
0-4
0 ;
textaliivc channclization 0: nutural Meander may points)
10
Sediment input
(? - ;
0-4
0-4
(c\tenslvc deposition 0; little or no sediment imm pones)
_
1
Sire .4 diversiti of channel bed substrate
NA*
0 .t
0 ;
�r
(tine, homo-enous 0: large diverse sizes max points)
1,
FN idence of channel incision or widening
0 - � I
0 a
(1- ;
tdccpl\ incise.) 0; stable hed & hanks max point-O
~
I '
Presence of major )rank failures
-
(1 -
Ise%erc cross ion 11: nu crosion. stable hanks ina\ p(ints)
0
Is.
Root depth and rlensih on hank%
0
0-4
0 _ ;
(no \ i�'ible roots 0: dense roots thrmwfliout - inax points)
1g__
Impact b� agriculture. livestock. or timber productinn
l
tsubsiantiat impact 0, no evidence max points)
16
Presence of riffle-poolrripple-pool complexes
O 3
0- ;
0 - tt
(m) riffles rippler or pools 0.- \Nell -developed ma\ Points)
17
habitat comple\Iq
0-6
t1 - 6
() to
I
F.,
(little orno habitat 0; frequent. varied habitats max points)
m
18
Canopt cm. erage over Mreambed
t1
0- 5
o -
(no ahading yeeetation - 0: contimtons canopy may points)
Substrate embeddeducss
(deepl% embedded : t) loose structure max)
Presence of stream im erlebrates Owe pam:.0
(no e%idcncc 0: common, numerous 1%pc. mils points)
L7
G
,1
^Presence of amphibians
0- l
0- 4
0-4
_
lllo l\ Idl'Ili'e (1. CUnlllltltt, 1111Jntroll% t1 pCS Ina\ pt/ltlls}
,y
Presence of fish
it 4
(uo e\ idenrC t), t t?n}tnttn, xllnn�r(,ir. tV lib max points.)
r_
00
Fvidence of \\ildlife Ilse
(n(t C\'Idence 11. abundant t'i`idvilit Ilia\ points
Total Points Possible
100
100
10t)
'J'0J`.,% 5C'()R1: also enter on firs) pagc')
4
�
I
hest characteristics are not aswssed in coastal sireamv
a

Lawsons Creek
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
35A,11 _ 7_)IAWarA,
Date: 7 10
Project/Site: Tomd )fiw./-
Latitude:
Evaluator.
County: yD.,,
Longitude:p�bg3
Total Points: lCA t
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circfe-orie)
Other 164 /rrla/G
if z 19 or perennial if k 30* �I
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
J
A. Geomorhology (Subtotal = f ° t
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
V Continuity of channel bed and bank =, r z ; ,
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalvmg
1;
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
.1.'
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches -
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
`f..r'
p)
1
1
2
2
3
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
10. Natural valley
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = b
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
a
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
01
r1.5
1_
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
.1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles,
0
0.5�
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes ='3
C. Biology ;Subtotal = ''L )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3`
2 ,
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1 .;
2
3
22. Fish
0
6.5
1
fs
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.
T 5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
'
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
15
26. Wetland plants in strearribed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
_
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: . , If A
�
Sketch: / ' 0 h U� �h� l j'^Bj .
t'y j ;, Y _ )J O ki
} /k
C, y�
)17� T ,

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Lawsons Creek
Dimensions
,� I Site:
Width: r. �� - ,a _ p
Height0
Depth water: 'ij Q; Notes
Natural I
Chan
Destruction
Pros
Vegetation matte
Leaf litter dis
Multipi
Cha
ine impressed on bank
Shelving
ges in character of soil
V
A terrestrial vegetation

USACE AID#
DWQ # _
Lawsons Creek
Site # (indicate on attached map)
In STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET ?0- 41�0
-4470, P f 4M
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: 1�
1. Applicant's name:(Q�f O )Oftfu 2. Evaluator's name: >" 1Ya 4'
3. Date of evaluation: Z� ?.� rg 4. Time of evaluation: Z
5. Name of stream: 1 Yf YW 3 - _ 1 / _ ' p6. River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order: 7
9. Length of reach evaluated:`_ _
10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):_
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 351 Longitude (ex.—77.556611):ai
Method location determined (circle):Mion
Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo I Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evalute nearby roa attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: lyff) ` )
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters v Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of theme evaluation point? YES O If yes, estimate the water surface area:-
Awml
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad mapl YES/ NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 4TP % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
JQ% Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other,
22. Bankfull width:_ W 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): Ii
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total 5 re: (from ra,verse): _ _ [ o me nts:,
Evaluator's Signature __
�7 t� " �, z��� __ - _ Date 7�
This channel evaluatio forho is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

Lawsons Creek
STREAM QUAHTV ASSESSMENT WO RKS"EET
t:( t;)11FG'ICi� POINT RANGEi= C HARACTERISTICS � i"- SCORE
nastal Piedmont Mountain
Presence or fto\i, i persistent pools in stream 5 i _
I to-. tt-a 1)-_ 1
(no ilo\\ or Satur ttion o. strung, Il(1\\ Ina\ points)
I''\ idence of past human alteration
(extensl\C alteration 0: no alteration maa points)
4
Ripnri In zone
it t1
0-4
(no butter 0: continuous, wide butter play pllillis)
.i
_
E► idence of nutrient or chemical discharges •
tt s
(1 - ��
(e\te nsi\'e diwcharges " O; no discharges nm\ point,)
a
Q
Gruunths-atcr di.scharge
tna dim harks 0 sprit, gti mxpis.. metlnnd-, ete. Ina\ points)
tt - a
t�
Presence of adjacent noodplain
0-4
0.4
(no ]loodplain - tt, emcnsivc Iltiodplain - Ina\ pi im%)
ai
Lntrenci meikt % tlnodplain access
Q () a
tdeep]} entrenched U, frequent flluidina - nui\ points(
Presence of adjacent wellands
0 0 t! •1
(no N�ctlands 0. lur.c adiacent ►wilands rods points')
—�
I)
Challncl sintlosi(N
() - ; 0-4
(est4nsive chmmnehzution tr natural meander may pmilt_s)
W
tit
- — Sr�linlent inp►lt
I! - *
0 - a
tc\tinsi\e deposition 0; little or no 5rdimcm III,I\ point,)
t {
Size & diversit\ of climmel bed substrate
NA,-
0-4
(lint horrio-!enow, tl; large. ]]le isc sizes ma\ poitllsi
�
EN idence (of channel Incision or videnin}
t!- �
t!-a
-f
tdccpl\ incised U stahic het] R hanks max points)
I i
Presence of major hank failures
(t _ ;
tt - {
tse\trc erosion 0: tics erosion stable hank, nla\ points)
pa
ca
Root depth anti d(nsit� on bank\
cl
tl - a
..
(no �i+ibl� root4 Q: dense roots dlrtlu�Lhotii Ina-, points(
Impact br agriculture, li\•ectock, or timber 13rod uctiinl
t! - ti
p a
(\ubsttn dil nnpau tl: no evidence Ina.\pUi11t1I
Presence of riffle-poolfrippie-pool complews
0-3
t) - 5
(no tiitlGseripp)cs or pools 0. \+ell -developed Inlet\ points)
F
17 �
habitat coluplesit�
u-t;
t) -t�
H
little or no habitat t); i'reyuent. °arled habitats ma, p(Ilnts)
C anop! coverage over mrcattllle(1
(no Sh tditly vCI-ctation 0: CAntm110114 sunup) Tully points)
t �
Substrate cull lldldiless
EV�1''
0-4
Ideeph enlbeddCd (1 Noise structure max)
Presence of stream in\ertchrates (see pugs •1)
)
t)-4
p -s
t11it i\ Idtlll'C ti: C(1111n1pn. tlutilf'rlI1H l;+pl". itic�\ pI111115)
Presence of amphibians
0
;
(not\ IdCUL! tt, CVtlIIII Lill. 11 11111'ruts t) pl'S max ponits)
G
Presence of fish
tt U l
(no e\ idence U. common. numerotis t\ pe. ilia\ points)
dense of \+ildlife tics
t1 h tl
(no e\ Mince (I, ah indant e\ idenCc imm i-iiiints)
Total Points Possible
It]O � 100
'i'OT'AE.'+C-OELF (a{s(I entrr nn fir,( ),as!c")
' 111t.•Se �']tOrileleiitiiiCa are not assessed in coastal itreanI
5.
tl- 1;
li-a
I
It_a
y1j
t) -?
p-3
0- 3
I) -a
0-5
)
o - 5fit►
0-6
I �v
0 6
�t
() - ?
u-a
i) -
7—
D-a
te
I ()(1
i
l s7
0

Lawsons Creek
Spa ::- IAW0
NU D W Q Stream Identification k'orm Version 4.11
Date: 7-i1 7D Project/Site: '� Latitude:
Evaluator: 5F%A County: y�qr Longitude: 4"t Pb) `tYS
Total Points: Stream Determination (circ Other Mw %10� /✓G
Stream is at feast intermittent Ephemeral Intermittent' erennia e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
-A. Geomorphology(Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong _
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank jty`
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
'
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
(
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
; CJ+
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
`ZT
1
2
3
9. Grade control?'
0.5
1
1.5,
10. Natural valley
0
1 0.5
1
f S
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes - 3_ -
`artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R_ Hvdrnlonv (Subtotal = )I I5' )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
Q
1
2 ?
3
14. Leaf litter
5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
7
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
Jv
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes ,. 3 ,.
C Rinlnnv (Suhtntal = 14 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3`
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1q
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
I
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. SeEk p. 35 of manual.
Notes: YOvv t . 4 , KA
Sketch:
� r
�E

Lawsons Creek
Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Check if present
❑ Natural line impressed on the bank
❑ , Shelving
d Changes in the character of the soil
YDestruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ Presence of litter and debris
Wracking
Vegetation matted down, bent, or bse t
❑ Sediment sorting
Notes
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑ Scour
❑ Deposition
Multiple observed flow events
❑ Bed and banks
Water staining
Change in plant community
r
J

Lawsons Creek
USACE AID# DWQ #_ Site # (indicate on attached map)
N STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET-
IAWYMl Gil
Provide the following information
,,, for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: (A or,n� 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: Zh G % __ 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: Wy5w.5 a` = S Q 6. River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order: } Znr3
9. Length of reach evaluated: 10,9 [� 10. County: I-OYM
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): � hC�k''J
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): i 5',y ` I d �� Lo;-Litude(ex.-77.556611): —77, O& y,._ J �'�
Method location determined (circle) GP Topo Sheet i �rtho (Aerial) Photo/ ' Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evalua ton note -nearby roads an an narks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
Bit/ !A✓
14. Proposed channel work (if any
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit: !i'�i ; `' _ . ` �'`' AA
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation poin . ES O If yes, estimate the water surface area:_ _ _
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map YES)NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Surve YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: °00 % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
22. Bankfull width: Z�
% Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): _
24. Channel slope down center of stream: k Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: +Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
t l
Total Score (from reverse): J Comments:
Evaluator's Signature' Date
This channel evaluatio fo m is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and i'nviroitmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT NVORKSHEET Lawsons Creek
E COREGION i'OI
TRANCE_
('EIARAt"I'1?Et14'E EC`ti
-
I_
'
1, icdmont
Mountain
I
Presence of fen\+ i persistent polar in stream
0_5
(}-a
�
p_g
(110 fleely or �,atllration 0. strong Ikial ttla\ pllintsl
1: a idence of past 11unian alteration
(i _
0 - �
0. 5
_
(extensive alteration - 1.1; 110 alteration max points) {
Riparian zone
(} - tl
0-4
(t -
(no buller 0: contiguous_ vv ids huller max points I �
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
W\telne,ive dlsclwre S � O7 no discharge,, ttla\ pUtrt,l
a
(:roundwt•atcr tli_s trgc
(}
0-a
o - a
Ino dim:hari;c 11. Sptiwp ,eepa \Ietla ads, CtC. max points)
n
Presence of adjacent noodplain
I1-4
0 a
n- ,
tno lloodplain - 0: cmellsive lloodplain ma\ poim,,)
Entrenchment / noodplain access
0U
- 1
() ,
1
(deeply entrenc lied 0. frequent flm-iding max points)
Presence of iadjacent wetlands
00
0 l
0 2
(no Netlauds 0, la r_e adjacent tletlands max points)
t)
Channel sinuosity
t) -
0 - a
(rxtelIANechanm:lization 0; natural mcandsr max pomb.)
10
Sediment input
(} 5
i)-4
li-a
(lmcnswc deposition U:'titl+, or no sedittient Illa\ pn1111%)
I I
Size S- di►'ersit\ orcbannel bed sullstrate
NA .
0 - -1
0 ;
itinc- homogenous (I: large, diverse Lille,, max poirlsl
Evidence of channel incision or wideniur
tdcepl\ incised 0 stable bell harks max poim:.)
FPresenc13
e ofmajorbankfailures
a
t e%ere erosion 0: no ertision. ~table batiks max points)
pp
I 1
Root depth and density on bank~
u-+
ti-4
0-?
d
(nu 1 i,ible root* Ol dense roars throughout ma\ pointa)
_ —
--------- -
impact by agriculture, livestock. or timber production
(substantial impat,1 O: no e,i&rlce ma\ ptlit)ts'l
Presence of riffle-pool.iripple-pnol complews
tilo riltles`ripplcs or pook 0. N01-developed ma\ points)
F
17
_._
Habitat complexityH
0-6
0 - h
it - Ci
(little or no habitat 0, frequent. varied habitats nuty plaints)
pa ~
IR
--— _
* Canopy coverage m er streambed
q-;
..............
t)-?
t)-i
�
x
vegetation . 0: co adin
g, nlmuous canopy near points)
t
{
Iy
Substrate embeddedness
�
tire#
tl - a
c,•a
(deeps embedded O 10AlNC StI'll ettire alas)
Presence or.stream imcricbrates (see paLc a)
(no t:\ idence 0: coninion. nutneroo, types alas - points)
I
U
. _.. _ —_ -
Presence or amphibians
p
(no c\ idcltre U: t �nuntvl- nutuerous tl Iaes Ina\, pointsl
ra
�a
l"t-Mace of fish
04
04
() I
I
-
tao es- idence U; common. mmncrou, h pe, mox pond,)
Evidence of wildlife use
t) t>
tl *
0
ino e\ Idcnce (I. abttlldant evidtlice ilia\ polnts)
'iota) Points Passible
1(10 100 I Oo
'E'i]'E`AL SC(?RE? (alstl Ltltt ' on first pat'_C)
* 111C.W characteristics are not assessed in coastal >tream%
SCOW:
W11
"4
3
3
d
9

TR-NWW-li
P54' a (
INU DWQ Ntream Identification Norm Version 4.11
Date: ao(�:' a Project/Site:
Evaluator: ���q/1` /xiw�
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent a /�
if > 19 or perennial if >_ 30* V
County: (
Stream Dete io ircle one)
Ephemer Intermit Perennial
Latitude:
Longitude: -77
Other /1/PiW i /irk
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
I Moderate
Strong_
a
1 Continuity of channel bed and bank
�
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
�j
t�
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain _
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
0�
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
9
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
@
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
V 1
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = i r�' 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
03
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
113
14. Leaf litter
1.5
01
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1.
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = 4 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3_
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0 '`
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
i 0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0 1
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
V
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
_
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Otherf'f
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual.
?S:
SA P `v--r' �( fa.- ts
�� f��«�
`"uEG"�� _ �(ow
_Z
r5

TR-NWW-li
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: ad o6"
Project/Site:
Latitude: 3�1I4 y�l
Evaluator. Co .+'
County: CA r�
Longitude: -77, Dmgj
Other /I�i -
i lee
Total Points:
Stream Dete tiv
Stream
Stream is at least intermittent ��
if 219 ors renniai ifZ 30*
Ephemeral ;Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
a •ty
� Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
g
_1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
q'
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0?
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
?
2
3
8. Headcuts
1 4?
1
2
3
9. Grade control
p1
0.5
1
E15
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
Nd =16
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B_ Hvdrolonv fSubtotal = I) 1
12. Presence of Baseflow,
0
1
2
(3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
U
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
I
1.5
16, Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
f
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =
C_ Sioloov (Subtotal = (L 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3 .
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
Cy
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
r
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
1
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
cff-5-j
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other ='I..
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: � C4
k eCf L� InQ.-Q
ya� V11U}0-1 G�
�G

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
TR-NWW-li
Dimensions 4a�t,-c, 7k4(4/t
site: �r'P��-- �1,�p�
Width: l y^
�Q)
-_
Height: a
�40 a�<
Depth water:°
Notes
Natural line impressed on bank
Shelving
Changes in character of soil
V P5 �' �G f` C 14w h-e- �QGr-
Destruction of terrestrial vegetation
Presence of litter and debris
Wracking
Vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
Sediment sorting
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away
Scour
i
Deposition
Multiple observed flow events
/
Bed and banks
Water staining
Change in plant community
'' 06(
Other:

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
TR-NWW-li
Check if present
❑
Natural line impressed on the bank
❑
Shelving
❑
Changes in the character of the soil
❑
Destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑
Presence of litter and debris
Wracking
❑ Vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑ Sediment sorting
Notes.
�r Leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑ Scour
0- Deposition
❑- Multiple observed flow events
❑ Bed and banks/
❑ Water staining
❑ Change in plant community

TR-NWW-lp
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
D ' - -57 -2U Z Project/Site:
Evaluator.. �OliV\ County: Gra
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one)
Stream is at least intermittent if Z 19 or Perennial if Z 30' Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Latitude: -;�S. O(oydY
Longitude: -:77 O'D062
Other 0 w i z-:-z ..
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor holo y (Subtotal = F' j f
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1"- Continuity of channel bed and bank.
1
2
v
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalvreg
0
1
2
3
3. In-dhannel, structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence
0
1
2
3'
4: Partible ske of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict fioodplain
.0
1
2
3
`6. Depcositionaf burrs, or benches
0
1
2
" 3
7, Recent alluvial deposits
_
0
_
1
2
3.
8. Headcuts 1
LB
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.59
10. Natural valley
c
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see disc%'ss_ions in manual
R_ Hvdroloov !Subtotal = 7 1 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
01
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing -bacteria
," .1
2
14. Leaf litter
t_ir'
1
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
_0
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
<_ T:
_
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
Ne = 0
Yes = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = I.rt
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21, Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish
0
1
2
3
0
0.5
1
.-A1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OB = 1.5
Other = 0 .
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: -
�� 1
A+P►

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions TR-NWW-lp
'AZ Site: �
Width: C7---
Height: `7 —ID
Depth water: �� --�� ,i ��
� Notes
Natural I
Chan
Destruction i
Presi
Vegetation mattes
Leaf litter dis-
Multipl
Chai
ine impressed on bank ✓
Shelving
ges in character of soil ✓
4
►f terrestrial vegetation
nce of litter and debris
Wracking
I down, bent, or absent
v
J
_
y
Sediment sorting
:urbed or washed away
./
Scour
✓
Deposition
e observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
ige in plant community
Other:
s��

TR-NWW-lp
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the s ream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Alt, j • fir` 2. Evaluator's name: �612L, I
3. Date of evaluation: is - �a - _2 >
5. Name of stream: U+ -f, •TrKA 4�- a Wtf
7. Approximate drainage area: i9 • �� , w. Z
j�
9. Length of reach evaluated:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
4. Time of evaluation: 1 % o
6. River basin: A14 VL—P,
8. Stream order:
10. County: C, lama ") -
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): �Ii5'1 . 10& ti U y Longitude (ex.-77.556611): � 7 T • b 0,a
Method location determined (circle): S Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluat)ote nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying tream(s) location):
A
14. Proposed channel work (if
15. Recent weather conditions: V44, -D,,, ►15f'r11 P-
16. Site conditions at time of visit: rf y �Ati
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters —Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential -40 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other i
22. Bankfull width: a- 12 23. k height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down 7,0 f stream: � lat (0 to 2%) =►' entle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: raight Occasional bends _Frequent meander Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality. JJ
Total Score (from reverse): emment$: V-t-r k u._ � lr :
p
Evaluator's Signature f " Date
This channel evaluation form is mes nded to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT
TR-NWW-lp
##
CHARACTERISTICS
P f)RFC;1(}N
!'0-INT-RAN(;P
SCORE
Coastal
Mountain
i
!
0-5
Presence of now / persistent pools in stream
�Piedmont
0-4
0;-_
(►tu flow or saturation 0; strong flow - max points)
v __-__�-
— - -
7
`
Evidence of past human alteration
..
0- b
0- 5
0- 5
(extensive alteration 0; no alteration max points)
—
Riparian zone
0 - b
0-4
I) -
(no bulTer : 0; contiguous, wide buffer - max ivints)�
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
-
().5
0-4
0-4
(extensive discharges 0; no discharges . max points)
-
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0- a
0-4
0-4
d
(no discharge - 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc., max points)
6
Presence of adjacent poodplain
0-4
0
0 -
rn
(no floodplain = 0, extensive floodplain - max points)
pr
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
n-_
�-
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding max points)
0
.4
0.4
0
8
--- Presence of adjacent wetlands- _
(no wetlands =- 0; large adjacent wetlands - max puiots)
_ _
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
(extensive channelixation 0; natural meander max points)
1).- Is
0.4
0-4
c/
iU
Sediment input -----
(extensive deposition 0; little or no sediment ntax points)-
-
i 1
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
0-4
0-5
NA"
(tine, homogenous - 0; large, diverse sizes - max points)
_...
1
Evidence of channel incision or widening0-5
()- 4
0-5
_
(deeply, incised - 0; stable bed S banks - max points).__
F.,
13
�
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
?
(severe erosion 0-, no erosion, stable banks - max Points)
depth and density on hanks
0-5
paRoot
14
0-3
U-4
H_
(no visible roots - 0; dense routs throughout max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber produclion
0-5
.0-4
0-5
S
(substantial impact --0. no evidence max points)'
-
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
y
Ifi
0-3
0-. 5
O-fi
(no nllleslripples or pools � 0; well -developed max points)
17
lfnbitat complexity
F
(little or no habitat - 0; frequent, varied habitats max points)
I
() . 5
0-5
E
Q
Canopy coverage over streambed
[) - 5
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy - max points)
x
19
Substrate embeddedness
(deepl) embedded = 0; loose stricture mar)_
�
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0. 5
`
(nu evidence 0; common, numerous types = max points)
0-4
i)-a
G7
�1
W
Presence of amphibians
0-4
p
(no evidence'- 0, common. numerous types itax points)
?�
0•4
C)
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
G
(no evidence , 0; common, numerous q pes - max points)
—
--
23 Evidence of wildlife use () 6 0 s 0-5
(no evidence :0; abundant evidence -max points)
-
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enler (tin lust Page)
� 6
" These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

_NC DWQ Stream_ I_d_entification Form Version 4.11 TR-NWW-lp
Date: Projectisite: Latitude: 3S: l o qe o �
_1 _"11A
Evaluator. �� C1 I County: G raV Longitude: - _q. 12�,�
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one) Other /VOw Z-er K\
Stream rsatleast lntermittent Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial ff z 30*
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
le. Continuity of channel bed and bank '
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thahAeg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
+
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
`- 1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
:0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0?
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
(No = 0
Yes = 3
anrnciai aiEenes are WE raIea; see aiscusssons In manual
R Wwrirnlnnv !Ci ihtntal = I 1 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
32
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1-'
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1. '
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
,Yes = 3
C_ Rieleriv lSuhtntal = 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
�3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3 .
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
(9-N
0.5
1
_
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
-).5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions TR-NWW-lp
Width. �Q' Site:
Height: �0
Depth water:
Notes
Natural line impressed on bank
Shelving
Changes in character of soil
Destruction of terrestrial vegetation V
Presence of litter and debris
Vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
Sediment sorting
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away
Multiple observed flow events j
Bed and banks
Water staining 1
Change in plant community

USACE AID#
DWQ#
TR-NWW-lpg
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
_0
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: t r Qj JM ^ 'I Q%V-'� 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: (o
5. Name of stream: UT
7. Approximate drainage area: Z
9. Length of reach evaluated: IPTi ,..
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):._ ,10 '6 b
4. Time of evaluation: +
6. River basin:, A1,1V y;=
8. Stream order:
10. County: L rd �L
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude (ex.-77.556611):
Method location determined (circle): C P Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: "' k U f W.nwa/
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Yv k V-A/
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: ,P% Residential
_% Forested
22. Bankfull width:
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ✓ Straight ,Occasional bends
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
0 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
Cleared / Logged _% Other i
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 9" G
_Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
_Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from revvrse11): , J Comments:
Evaluator's Signature _ - � _ Date �' 3(7
Signature_--_ ZdZ
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

TR-NWW-lp
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT'WORKSHEET �SL
CHARACTERISTICS
Presence of flo»° / persistent pools in stream-�
(no flow- or saturation - 0; strong slow - max points)
ECOREGION POINT RANGE - SCORE
---_ _ Coastal nedmont Mountain i
0-5 V 0-4 0-5
.,
- t
{s'1'IYGII�L V1 t/fill 71"1411111 A7«i a%17J11
(extensive alteration - 0; net alteration - max points)
0-66
0-
1 i
Riparian zone
—
0 - 4
_
(no bull'er - 0; contiguous, wide buffer max points)
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
ll
0
(extensive discharges - 0; no discharges max points)
0-:
0 d
a
I Groundwater discharge
(no discharge 0 sprin es, seeps, wetlands, etc. max points)
0-4
0
Presence of adjacent noodplain
6
(no tloodplain = 0: extensive lloodplain = inax points)
—
7
Entrenchment / flnodplain access _
0-5
0-4
(deeply entrenched _ 0; frequent flooding - max points)
R
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0.6
0. 4
(no wetlands = 0, large adjacent wetlands - max points)
9
0-5
0-
Channel sinuosity
(extensive channelization 0; natural meander max poin(s)
Sediment input
0-5
0.4
t0
(extensive deposition 0; little or no sediment max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
0.4
NA*
(tint, homogenous 0; large, diverse: sixes - max points)
1,
Evidence of channel incision or widening
() _ i
0-4
(deep]v incised 0; stable tied & banks = max
I
_points)
Presence of major hank failures
0-5
0- 5
a
(severe erosion : 0, no erosion, stable banks - max points)
pq
14
Root depth and density on hanks
tl - �
t1 - 4
(no visible roots ; 0, dense roots throughout max points)
p
j 5
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0_ ,
(t a
(substantial impact 0, Ito evidence , ntux points)
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
(l-5
1(i
(no nfllesirnpples or pools = 0. »-cl1-dcvclopcd _ ntax points)
17
llabitat complexity
() _6
6
0-6
FI
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats - max points)
_
1R
() - i
0
Canopy coverage over streambed
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
NA,
() -
ly
Substrate embeddctlness
(deeph embedded = 0; loose structure - max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page a)
0-4
0 - i
(no evidence 0; common, numerous types _ max points)
1
Presence of amphibians
tf - a
0-4
p
(no evidence 0; common, numerous types inax points)
0.4
04
��
'TPresence of fish
(i 1
0
(no evidence 0; comnwn, numerous tt pes - ttlax pt?rots)
Evidence of wildlife use 0 0- 5
(no evidence - 0; abundant evidence = max points) M_
Total Points Possible IN 100
_ _TOTAL SCORE (also coulter (tn first pagc)
* 'I hese characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
0-2
/'
M
3=
0-5
2
0-5
() - 6
0-5
0-5
0-4
0-a
j
as
0-5
100
/00
i

&" -t / � -)
TR-NWW-2i
NV DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: �� �-�o - 20
Project/Site: -I-( of
Latitude: 3 1( Z2 T-4/
Evaluator. �gX�G(G ;�� ,,
County: Grate -cam
Longitude: -�� n �� 2
Total Points: �l
Stream is at least intermittent �i
Stream Determination (circle one)
iitept Perennial
Other MGw I�GP.ft/
Quad Name:
if? 19 a perennial if 30 �
Ephemerral.Interm
e.g.
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =. }
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18• Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0 .,
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
S 0 a
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
Z)
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0-
2
3
8. Headcuts
<C)
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0-
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
artficaal ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = }
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
d.5 \ - `
0
_
15. Sediment on plants or debris
�Q>
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris !fines or piles
1 0
1 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biolony (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3_
cz;'
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
-
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
- 1,
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5;'Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
`
Notes:
Sketch: a� `' 1�. �id` ti
g4iv✓w1I
1AV11-, 0/.0-1
S� e- wL f /(I
�✓%

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
-'� Dimensions � TR-NWW-2i site: 5 �
Width: m - — ----- -----
Height: Z _ Sao a�
Depth water: �o -:��,�
Notes
Natural II
Chan!
Destruction (
Prese
Vegetation matte(
Leaf litter disc
Multiple
Char
ine impressed on bank
Shelving
ges in character of soil
)f terrestrial vegetation
nce of litter and debris
Wracking
I down, bent, or absent V
Sediment sorting
curbed or washed away
Deposition
s observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
ige in plant community
Other:

USACE AID#
Effl-14r01i
TR-NWW-2i
Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -A,40
Provide the following
winformation for the stream reach under assessment: 1
1. Applicant's name: 2. Evaluator's name: FAPe6L-, i sel (9"'%
3. Date of evaluation: ba - '�O - Z 020
5. Name of stream: l) T 4., Tr q, 14 .,.
7. Approximate drainage area: 0 • Z 2
9. Length of reach evaluated: 0
11. Site coordinates (if known):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 7'5'
prefer in decimal degrees.
II 2Z3
4. Time of evaluation:
6. River basin: (t4e,f
8. Stream order:
10. County: G r� ✓�
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude (ex.—77.556611): ? r SS
Method location determined (circle): PS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluate (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
0-
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: w-44r A*,t. tb,rv, ,
16. Site conditions at time of visit: no( V61 A-
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: -50 % Residential
% Forested
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
Z 0 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Cleared / Logged _% Other
22. Bankfull width, 3 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): Z
24. Channel slope down center of stream: '41at (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ✓Straight 'occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 2 �v Comments:
Evaluator's Signature_Date
This channel evaluation form (s intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

/(— -4-
TR-NWW-2i
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT AXORK5HEET �
ECORE1C'11ARA('TFRIST1('S '
ti
mountain
C"oatital Pieduloni
1
Presence of now i persistent pools in stream
0- 5
o - 4
(1 - 5
tau lion\ of aaulration D, strong 11mN mn\ points)
+
Evideucc of past hunnan aheration
"
(ext`nsive alteration U, no alteration max points)
0-6
G - ?
(► . �- ..
_
Riparian Boni
t1 . fl
it - .T
O • �
lno holier l)_ `tlnta>;nu11,, 1\ule butler max pohitO
}
F,,idence of nutrient or chemical discharger
0 z
o
(em nsive discharges - 0; no discharges ma\ paint.}
a
Grounthvater discharge
(1-4
(no discharge 0, sp,inas, seeps. \%e lands, etc. 11141\ points)
h
Presence of adjacent ilondpinin
t1--I
(1_.}
t)-..
nnit\) ann I p
(nil floodplain
a"
renehntent 1 flnotlpin,in access
0-5
0-4
0 - ,
ldee h ermenclied I), frequent flooding nuix points)
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0 t,
(no wetlands (1, 1.11;.'--C adjacent k%etlands max points)
y
Channel sinuosit"
() _ ;
(1-4
0- i
(eaten r\e chminrhzalion U: tlatural 111vander 11111.\ points)
111
Sediment input
0- 5
0-4
t) - •l
(e\tensi\c depusition 0. little or no sediment ma\ points)
D -
Size & diversity oaf channel bed substrate
I � NA* D - .i
(line, honlo-enous D: lark_ di\rr.,c saes max purists)
F.\ idence of channel incision or widenin
tdcepl\ 1nci.svd ' D st loll hed be hanks ilia\ point o
Presence of major bank failures
D-i
(severe erosion 11; no erosion. wablt bank, may points)
pq
Roat depth and densih on hanks
H
(no vrsihlc routs - D; dense routs throu"lunrt ma;\ paints)
_
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or limber produclinn
(substantial impact 1). no evidence naafi poin(s)
I t�
Presence of riffle-pool'ripple-pool comple\es
[1
l) _
(1- 6(no
ri1'(les"rippics or poor 0: well-develolictl may points)
D - h
.....—
0-6
E�
H17
_ ... _—.
Habitat coluplexrty
11t1bilal O: )'r•equent. habitats
-------
t) - 6
(little or no varied max point, )
C"anop3 coverage over rtt earnhed
11 -
D • ?
t) -
f
(lit) Shading %vulation _ D: continuous camp\ nlat\ points)
!tl
Stibstriale emblddcduess
NA-
0.4
D - 4
(deepl% embedded 0: Inure strl lure max)
0.4
o • i
D - 5
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
(no e\ ldencc (). common. numerous I\ pes ina+ points)
I
I'rescnrc of em plaibiatls
() . -1
D - •I
0-4
p
(nu c\ idencc q; conunon, hu1110111 ; I\ lies max points)
G�,
Presence of fish
D 4
() 4
U -
(nu e\ idence U; conlnlun, nllmirau, t}Ilea max points )
Evidence of wildlife use
D 0
(1
.. l
Ino e\ idence 1). abundant eviticiux m a\ pointsi
'T•ota) faints Ptlrribh:
IDO
100
� 11x)
TOTAL SCORE (also enllr 11tt firtil
page)
* I
heae ch;uacterislics
are not assessed in missal zlream--
/t/4
fay

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: [e - ProjectlSlte:��, l✓
Evaluatorcounty: C
Total Points: Stream Determination (cirri$ ore)
Stream isatleast intermittent Ephemeral Intermittent Perren�niial.
if z 19 or perennial if a 30*
TR-NWW-22p
Latitude: 3S 1 f G
Longitude-11, U 011645
Other.rL,t�%
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal =��}
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
i3
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalvreg
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool;
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
2
3
5. Activelrelictfloodplain
0"
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
cl
2--
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
D)
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
.,0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
;e Yes = 3
"artificial ditches are not rated; see MSCUss1bn51n manual
IZ Ltarlrninne1 1@i.k+-+o1 = ­1 ✓ 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
03
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
Os
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of -high water table?
No = 0
( Yes = 3
r` Rinlf% ►Ci ih4n4al = r-S. - 5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
4
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
-_ 3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
M
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
-_2
3.
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
-0,
0.5
1
11.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: �ar ,�c�.�
( ` +emu_ cf
k

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions
Width:
Height: 4a0 a0
Depth water: - 1-2-�° �o �Q;
Natural I
Chan
Destruction i
Presc
Vegetation mattes
a
Leaf litter dis,
"ultipl
Chai
TR-NWW-2p
Site: 45/�
Notes
ine impressed on bank
V
Shelving
ges in character of soil
)f terrestrial vegetation V
,nce of litter and debris
Wracking
i down, bent, or absent
Sediment sorting
J
Curbed or washed away /
Scour
Deposition
e observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
✓
ige in plant community
Other:

USACE AID#
DWQ#
TR-NWW-2p 1 �
49)
Site # (indicate on attached map)
.,e„ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: i, C-Iv tn,N- 1 nun 4 1-L"' 2. Evaluator's name: Q/ 40-Ock-,1 _. 114
3. Date of evaluation: (o" J - 20-2-+0 4. Time of evaluation: l L2 D
5. Name of stream: L)a 40 j?iw 6. River basin:
• 2 Z 1
7. Approximate drainage area: �Mi 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: 2dw -1^,_ 10. County: (a v L�
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): f � 0 - I OtO , Longitude (ex.-77.556611): JW i o!a
Method location determined (circle): Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluat' to nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):_
14. Proposed channel work (if any):_
15. Recent weather conditions:—_ -r k"',
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
r') o rvn,&A,•
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 7 b % Residential
22. Bankfull width
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
­161/o Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
% Cleared / Logged _% Other i
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): ( - b
24. Channel slope down center of stream: �at (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ✓Straight V Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
_% Forested
b --it)
Total Score (from reverse): ! Comments:
Evaluator's Signature_ :_ 14 A` _ Date 4 Jr0
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

TR-NWW-2p
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT'WORKSHFFT o
## 1
CHARACTERISTICS
rCOREGI'(T-F6iF4T
RANGE
SCONE
Coastal
Piedmont-
— -
1
I
-Mountain_
U i__..._
-- --
Presence or now / persistent pools in stream
--
() _ 5
0-4
(nu flow or saturation 0; strong flow - max points)
_—
�()
— _
- _ ..
.,
Evidence of past human alteration
_ () _ �
_ i
t► _ q
O
(extensive alteration u- 0; no alteration max 1xiints)
—
Riparian zone
0.6
0-4
0 - 5
(no buffer - 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max mints)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
l
(extensive discharges - 0; no discharges max points)
—;,—
a
5
(:roundw•ater discharge
— 0-;
0-4
0- 4
3
(no discharge - 0: springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. max points)
`
_
6
Presence of adjacent ftoodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
tJ
(no floodplain = 0: extensive noodploin - max points)
Entrenchment / floodpfain access
(deeply entrenched = O: frequent flooding - max points)
-- �
0-_
_...
o
-
s
Presence Of Adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-a
(nto %ketlands - 0; large adjacent wetlands- max puinis)
--
Channel sinuosity'
0-5
0.4
0-3
(extensive chnnnelization 0; Natural meander max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive deposition' 0; little or no sediment ma\ poinisl
1l
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
0-4
0-5
04,4
NA*
(fine, homogenous 0; large, diverse sizes - max points)
0-5
1'
-
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0.4
U - 5
(deeply incised: 0; stable bed & banks = mas points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
J
0-5
0-5
0-5
(severe erosion : 0; no erosion, stable banks � max points)
_ _
-
PQ
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
H
(no visible roots = 0; dense rtvts throughout max points)
1?
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
(substantial impact -0, no evidence mux points)
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
16
0-3
0-5
0 - ti
(no rillles!ripples or pools = 0; well-dcveloped max points)
— --_--
-- _ —
—
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
e
E�
0-6
0-6
E.,
(little or no habitat - 0; frequent, varied habitats - max points)
_
1
0-5
0-5
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
3
x
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy �- max points)
ly
Substrate embeddedacss
NA*
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose stricture max)
0- 5
0-5
,0
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
(no evidence 0: common, numerous types max points)
() a
1_
—"�^— Presence of amphibian's
0-4
0-4C�
p
(no evidence ' 0; common. numerous types max points)
p
-)�
0-4
0.4
0--4
Y
Presence of fish
(no evidenut 0; common. numerous types - trla� point
Evidence of wildlife use
0-5
,p
23
0 6
0- 5
(no evidence - W. abundant evidencv = nl a% points)
Co
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
tvo
TOTAL SCORE Olso cnler on first
page)
�
' These characteristics are not assessed tit coastal Mreams

TR-NWW-3i
W -P2
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: G r V 'XV
Project/Site: f
i Latitude: ';,5`i) 02Qp 6Z
Evaluator: Ste' *A
County: tAw.^
Longitude: `77.b3rP3
Total Points:
Stream Determination {circle one)
Other XP.N $ _ n /�t,
t
Stream is at least intermittent
if z 19 or perennial ifz 30*
Ephemeral intermittentPerennial
e.g. Quad Kame
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = _ )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank ,
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalvmg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits'
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
Cl f
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
8_ Hvdroloov (Subtotal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
23
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3,
14. Leaf litter
1.5
",1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
S
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
OJ
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = �-f )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
' b"
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
13,
2
1
0
20. Macrabenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1-.
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
-1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5,
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL=''1.5) Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions 0 '
Width: _yrp P
Height:
Depth water:
Natural
Chan
Destruction
Pros
Vegetation ma
Multipl
Cha
TR-NWW-3i
A�
m
Site:
m
Notes
tted
Leaf litter dis
Multipl
Cha
TR-NWW-3i
A�
m
Site:
m
Notes
I
impressed on bank
Shelving
ges in character of soil ✓
of terrestrial vegetation
Prose
of litter and debris
Wracking ✓
down, bent, or absent)
Sediment sorting
turbed or washed away ✓
Scour
Deposition
e observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
nge in plant community ✓
Other:

TR-NWW-3i
Ll JSACE AID#_
DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET �, a
TAWS pfw. SSP -nz
Provide the following informattio, n__ ••for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: 1&'✓ N 2. Evaluator's name: � "" A
3. Date of evaluation:_.- - p �� 4. Time of evaluation: `t�.
a /►`'
�1 . f
5. Name of stream: VT � �fE *` � / �i N°t1� 6. River basin: �'�
7. Approximate drainage area: _
9. Length of reach evaluated:___.__.__....... B k
11. Site coordinates (if known):: prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): __...._.J�s ! 0Z b C12
8. Stream order:
10. County: ---- _'__.'
12. Subdivision name (if any): r3 ?
Longitude (ex. -77.556611): -77, l S
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: A1111 ^ 1
16. Site conditions at time of visit: /y�'Y• 0"
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10
Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-M
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: U %Residential f
&% Commercial % Industrial _% Agricultural
% Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other +.
22. Bankfull width: IV 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): %a
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight 6-Occasional bends _Frequent meander Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):.
I
Evaluator's Signature ` V ter. Date_-____-
This channel evaluation farm is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

TR-NWW-3i
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
1
0-4
0-5
_—.
(no flow or saturation = 0; stron flow = max oints)0-5
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
( extensive alteration = 0: no alteration = max p, � =ints )
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
(no buffer = 0; conti: � :ious, wide buffer = max points)
9
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges =max +pints)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
?,
(no d_ ischart2.e = 0; sprin�s, seeps, wetlands. etc. = max pints)
U
r.r
Presence of adjacent floodplain
6
0-4
0-4
0-2
(no floodllain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points,P
0-5
0-4
0-2
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
Wee ply entrenched = 0: frequent flooding = m_ax_(ioints h
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; lar>~e adjacent wetlands = max -Hunts)
9
Channel sinuosity
_
0-5
0-4
0-3
( extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
_ ____
10
0-5
0-4
0-4
Sediment input
(extensive�.
deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
ll
NA
0-4
0-5
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
i fine. homo+�.enous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max oints )
Evidence of channel incision or widening
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max t�iltts)
12
0-5
0-4
0-5
0-19
' 13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
► 4
i. severe erosion = 0; no erosion stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
F
p n_o visible roots = 0: dense roots throughout = max points
15
—
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-4
0-5
substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)0-5
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
=
16
0-3
0-5
0-6
Z.
F
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0• well -developed max points)
0-6
2--
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
�
an
little or no habitat = 0; fie vent, varied habitats = max points)
eo
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
no shading -vegetation = 0: continuous canoe = max . omts)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(& A, embedded = 0: loose structure = max)
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
20
0-4
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0: common, numerous types = maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O
[no evidence = 0: common, numerous types = max points)
0
22
_ Presence offish
0-4
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
i no evidence = 0- abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible 11 100 l )0
- .... --- ...... ......
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
`O
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

TR-NWW-3p
ssy -ps-
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: % 2,
Project/Site:
Latitude: 5f, la 2y2
Evaluator. S �
County: clr r
Longitude: `7 09/2v
Total Points:
Stream is least intermittent
Stream Determination t
Other Wpt,.- ��
l
at
if_19orperennial ifa30*
Ephemeral Intermitt erennial
p
e. Quad Name:
g
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = a+_ ) I
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
5. Activelrelict floodplain
1 _
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
B. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
0 i"0.5
No,="0 °
1 1.5
Yes = 3
.1 artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = `l1 ]
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes,;- 3.
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = way )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
iT. 1
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other =:
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. Seep 35 of manual.
Notes: 'b,M75
Sketch:

TR-NWW-4i
NC DWn gtream identification Form Version 4.11
Date: % _
Project/Site: 11fj5,,r
Latitude: 3j ; OV 9 7
Evaluator:, i`��
County:gr„�
Longitude: -��
Total Points: �'"
Stream is at least intermittent `Z'� 7
Stream Determinati ircle one)
Ephemera. fermitte erennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name: �( w
if a 19 or ,•.erennial if a 30'
o
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = _%_' )
1a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
Weak
Moderate Strong
0
1
2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
710=
2 1 3
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream, substrate
0
4i2
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
; 1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2)
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
777
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
-
0.,_
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
j 11. Second or greater order channel
_ No = ©)
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrolocv Subtotal = l
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
r Rlnln,v SiihtntnI = , 1
0
1
2
3
C�
1
2
3
1.5
1
0.5
0
C
±_0.5
1
1.5
�0
0.5
1
1.5
No = 0
Yes;IT3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2 J
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed eelvcyt
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) -JXJ,S
0
1 1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 '
1
2
3
22. Fish -A�J �i�ja✓+"rr f/riT'
0
0.5
1 .a
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
15
24. Amphibians
0
0..5
25. Algae
0-
0.5
1
4 5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =,1.5� ther = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
f
07" ��� -

m
TR-NWW-4p
%%�-02
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: ! , !
Evaluator: L
w
Project/Site: ' kov �- '
Latitude: 3S' 1011 4
Longitude: _ L, 7
Coun •
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent �{
Stream Determination circle o . e �
Ephemeral Intermittent Perenn'iV
Other �rli
Name:
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30" ✓ �/
e.g. Quad
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal Absent
1a, Continuity of channel bed and bank t 0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence 0
4. Particle size of stream substrate _ 0
5. Active/relict floodplain 0
6. Depositional bars or benches 0
�7.
Weak
Moderate
Stronc
f 1
2
3
1
2
63
1
/�
0
3
1
3
1
2
"
1 °
2
3
Recent alluvial deposits
9,1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
`y1
2
3
9. Grade control
d)
0.5
1
1'�
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
_1
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes -
_ f
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (y _Subtotal =�
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter _
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0
1
2
2
i
3
0
1
0.5
0
0.
1
1.5
0
0.5
;1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes p
U IaloloCIV (subtotal = Yv
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
r31 i
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
2
1
0
0
2
2
3
3
22. Fish
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
0
1' :
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1 `t
1.5
_25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
[i
0.5
1 1
1.5
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other 0
"perennial streams may also be idenffie:: using other methods.. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: f'�'' _'- (0rA L-7
Sketch:
<..�----- i�r SIY1uY

TR-NWW-4p
Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Check if present �
❑ Natural line impressed on the bank L^� Leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑ Shelving ❑ Scour
Changes in the character of the soil Deposition
[ Destruction of terrestrial vegetation ❑ Multiple observed flow events
Presence of litter and debris ❑ Bed and banks
Wracking Water staining
[� Vegetation matted down, bent, or se Change in plant community
Sediment sorting
Notes: M a'

USACE AID#
DWQ#.
TR-NWW-4p
Site #
(indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following informatio'/n� for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: /�4W 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: A ) r'
5. Name of stream:___ 5— kI - llt,/yGrs,
7. Approximate drainage area:
9. Length of reach evaluated: _
4. Time of evaluation:
6. River basin: / iIN
8. Stream order:_ J
10. County: AAV-/'"
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): ray Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3 7 � � � � � _.._. _ � +: x.-77.556611): - ` / . Pb�y 73
Method location determined (circle)�in
Topo Sheet i' o (Aerial) Photo/GI ' Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaote nearby road, :_ ,! a t fl h, attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):__
15. Recent weather conditions: Nam' ` 1
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: % Section 10 _Tidal Waters —Essential Fisheries Habitat
—Trout Waters —Outstanding Resource Waters !' Nutrient Sensitive Waters —Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES/)If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map?E Survey NO
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil SurveNO
21. Estimated watershed land use: ) ©!�I�% esidenfial % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
—% Forested —% Cleared / Logged Vo Other
22. Bankfull width: 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1;�".
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Ajlat (0 to 2%) —Gentle (2 to 4%) —Moderate (4 to 10%) —Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends 0 Frequent meander Very sinuous —Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 5 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature" Date`
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

TR-NWW-4p
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
k*COREGION POINT
[CANOE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
piedmont
Mountain
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
L5-
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong. flow = max hints
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
(extensive alteration = 0: no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0 4
0-4
(extensive discharges = 0: no discharges = max points)
I
S
_—
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
7
Q'
(no dischar&e = 0, sl)rini5, seeps, wetlands. etc. = maxpoints)
,i
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
Z„
(no flood lain - 0: extensive floeain = max points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0- 4
0-2
deeply entrenched = 0: try . uent flooding = maxpoints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
'0- 3'
22
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
y
10
Sediment input
0-5
0- 4
0-4
�7
(extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
(fine, homogenous = 0; lame, diverse sizes = maxpoints)_
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
f�
y
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
E-
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
C"
(severe erosion = 0: no erosion. stable banks = maxpoints)0-5
M
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
�p
F14
max�anmt(no visible v►s►ble roots = 0; dense roots throughout = s )
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0- 5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence ..,= max points)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well -developed = maxpoints)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
F-
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max pointsl
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
(no shadimu ve_;etation = 0: continuous canoe = max mints)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeel, embedded = 0; loose structuremax)
?[i
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
ino evidence = 0: common, numerous types = max f1oints)
i
0-4
0-4
0-4
.
G7
21
Presence of amphibians
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous t� pes = max points)
O
0-4
0-4
0-4
�J
22
Presence of fish
(no evidence - 0; common, numerous types - max ornts)
,G^
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0: abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total ;mints Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SWIM (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

TR-NWW-4p
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 7) �� C�� Project/Site:�1 Latitude: ?�r� 773Z
f-- _ - _-----
Evaluator: Syt,�t„ %it, County: ,, Longitude:
Total Points: Stream Determination ( Other
ifStream!19is oereleast intermittent f:3 Ephemeral Intermitten erenn al e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or r.::erennial if >_ 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank y
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
riui le-r.00l sequence
Absent
0
Weak
Moderate
Strong
3
1
2
0
1
2.
3
0
1
/ 2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate__
0
0
0
1
1
1
2
.f'
r
f 3 -
3
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
0
1 0.5
1
tL5
No 0 ?
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
r 3,
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
r
1
.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1
1 1.5
07. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 13
C. Bioloov i Subtotal = 11 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2,7.
3
Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
_21.
22. Fish
0
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
Q,5'
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
�
Notes: 1LJ
r
Sketch: f
t'

TR-NWW-4p
Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Check if present
❑
Natural line impressed on the bank.
[
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
Shelving
❑
Scour
[/
Changes in the character of the soil
❑
Deposition
[v1
Destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑
Multiple observed flow events
❑
Presence of litter and debris
❑
Bed and banks
❑
Wracking
❑
Water staining
❑
Vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
Q�
Change in plant community
❑
Sediment sorting
Notes:

USACE AID#
DWQ #
TR-NWW-4p
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: [�
1. Applicant's name: L) _ _ d At .� _ 2. Evaluator's name:, Yh; 4, r
3. Date of evaluation: a
5. Name of stream:
4. Time of evaluation: 63
6. River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: __
10. County:_
br
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): Di 7 1 Z Longitude (ex.—77.556611): —71
Method location determined (circle): GPS ) Topo Sheet rtho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluai � nn (note nearby roads anattach map identifying stream(s) location):
Ilk
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: -
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known:Section 10 _Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters V Nutrient Sensitive
e Waters _water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES JIf yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? Q NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 100 % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _ % Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: _ 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends DL_Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 3
Evaluator's Signature ,a Date__
This channel evaluation f :n is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data requited by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

TR-NWW-4p
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
CCOREGION_POINT
RANGE
#
CHA CTERISTICS
SCORE:.
Coastal
Piedmont mountain
0-5
Presence of f 4 tw / persistent pools in stream
0-4 0-5
f no flow or saturation = 0; strop:; flow = max : ints a
2
0-6
0-5 0-5
Evidence of past human alteration
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints o
—_—_ _
3
0-6
0-4 0-5
f
tt iparian zone
f no buffer = 0; conti. -uous, wide buffer = max points)
4
0-5
0-4
0 4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
('extensive discharges =0; no dischar•,,es = max I�Ants)
5
0-3
0-4
0-4
04
Groundwater discharge
d
(no discharge = 0, siseed s, wetlands, etc. = max ; , lints;
_.
Presence of adjacent floodplain
6
0- 4
D- 4
0- 2
2
e no floodpAain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
0-5
0-4
0-2
a
Entrenchment / floodplain access
(deeply entrenched = 0, [Trequent floodin- = max points)
0-6
0-4
0-2
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
(no wetlands = 0; larL�e adjacent wetlands = max 114 pints)
0-5
0-4
0-3
9
Channel sinuosity
(extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = max points)
10
0-5EqNA*
0-4
0-4
Sediment input
(extensive deposition= 0- little or no sediment = max points i
11
0-4
0 -5
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
t fine, homo: enous = 0;1 ;: e, diverse sizes = max oints)
Evidence of channel incision or widening
12
0-5
0-4
0-5
�incised = 0=stable bed &,banks =max ; w�mts)
(1
"
rvdee�
Presence of major bank failures
13
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
.4
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints)
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
F14
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max oints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max Joints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
- 0-6
jl
no riffles/ripples or cols = 0; well -developed = max ints
F
Q
I
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
little or no habitat = 0; uent, varied habitats = maxpoints)0-6
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
f
I
(no shading: vegetation = 0; continuous cano v = max oints)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0- 5
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous tv es = max oints)
V
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
Ga`(no
evidence = 0; common, numerous ! es = max oints)
Presence of fish
0 4
0-4
0-4
m22
no evidence = 0, common, numerous es = max pints)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5
fno evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total poin ossible 100 100 130
TO I' CORE (also timer gn first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

TR-NWW-5i
NC' DWn Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 7s)7- 0 �
Date:
Project/Site: Tko"M)44
Latitude: �5 , v'b 77:3
Evaluator. f�.,
County: �,, r"
Longitude: J 77, (J7241
Total Points:
Stream is of least intermittent �
Stream Determ- watlon_ (circle one)
Ephemeral.Intermitten , 'Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name: y�i /3�
if 2 19 of Perennial if k 30*
A. Geomor holo y (Subtotal =^ ,.
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18. Continuity of channel bed and bank /
a
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalvea
0
2
3
3. in -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri, le- ool sequence
�
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1 '
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
l
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0,)
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No u
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussi in manual
B. Hvdroloav iSubtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
'0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes - 3 .'
C. Biology (Subtotal = r () cb.6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
'
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 .'
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
`q
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1_.
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0:'
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25, Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 i 5. OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: SSA
--1
(p,l5

USACE AID# DWQ #. _ Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
r "
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: -
�� TR-NWW-5i
1. Applicant's name: 2. Evaluator's name: I
3. Date of evaluation: % % F-D 4. Time of evaluation: %
5. Name of stream: _14
7. Approximate drainage area:
9. Length of reach evaluated:.__ _
11. Site coordinates (if known{) prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3 5,y 9 ;77;73
6. River basin:_
S. Stream order:
10. County:
12. Subdivision name (if any):__ �-7
Longitude (ex.-77.556611):_.__-77 p� (/5
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
5"i
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 121t_ % Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ,
22. Bankfull width: 15,
_ _. 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: —%,e�'lat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends Frequent meander _Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
continent section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's Signature___ _._.._ _. _ Date
This channel evaluation'fovin is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners n environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEETTR-NWW-5i
ECOR�EGION
POINT
"RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCOJa
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
Coastal
0-5
Piedmont 1
0-4
Mouutiim
0-5
7-
p
(no flow or saturation = 0; stron , flow = max p pints
0-6
0-5
0-5
2
Evidence of past human alteration
p extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max _ pLtpts
0-5
3
Riparian zone
0-6
7
0-4
no buffer = 0; conti-uous, wide buffer = max Joints 1
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
( extensive dischar yes = 0; no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
j
no disch�Y. e = 0; sjinu"s, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max n+,ints i
U
Presence of adjacent floodplain
p_ 4
0— 4
6
0— 2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max p��yints)
0— 5
_
0— Z
j
a
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0— 4
( dee 1 entrenched = 0; frequent floodin; , = max � i t , ints )
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; lar�le adjacent wetlands = max pints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max p igmts )
10
0-5
0-4
0-4
Sediment input
R extensive de position= 0; little or no sediment = max_ points) _
11
NA
0-4
U-5
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
s fine, homoti enous = 0- lan-,e, diverse sizes = max [it mts )
Evidence of channel incision or widemn:w
12
0-5
0-4
0-5
>1
(deep 1) incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max I)t`kIits)
�F''
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
ra
(severe erosion = 0• no erosion. stable banks = max (points
Root depth and density on banks
14
0-3
0-4
0-5
3
F
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout =max_pumts
0-5
0-4
0-5
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
(substantial linf)act =0; no evidence = max points't
_
0-3
0-5
0-6
_i.__
6
- - _... -
Presence of riffle-pooVr►pple-pool complexes
(no riffles/ripples or souls = 0 well -develop a = max 1 pints)
E
1
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points
CQ
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
,x
0; continuous
(no shading vegetation = canopy = max pints)
19
_ _ Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
dee 1 embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
>W
0
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
Z
O(no
evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
O 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0-4 0-4
(no evidence = 0. common, nt_stmrouints)
Evidence of wildlife use
23 0-6 0-5 0-5
tuts
p no evidence = 0- abundant evidence = max points
Total Voints Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also eater on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

TR-NWW-5p
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
S5T }q i
Date: -� 112b
ProjectiSite: rr �I�LY
Latitude:,3!�'.
Evaluator. SYy1�tYX1U1Y1
County: ��a\jey\
Longitude: -77,cT7 95, Z
Total Points:
Stream is of least intermittent
Stream Determination (cif
Other N itlV,,
it? 19 or rwennial if z 30*
ereEphemeral Intermittent nnial
e.g.4uadNaine:C
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ' U
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thahAeg
0
1.
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2O
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
'2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
i
2
3
8. Headcuts
'0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.!
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drolo (Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3'
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3'
C. Biology Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
In2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1;
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
9;
2
3
22. Fish
23. Crayfish
0
0
0.5
1
1
1.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
Z
1 0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
L02
t 0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
DimensionsF!
�S g Site:
Width:
m
Height: _— �0 a�z
Depth water: ko
Natural I
Chan
Destruction i
Prese
Vegetation matte(
Leaf litter disl
Multipl,
Chai
TR-NWW-Sp
.Tip°-►^:`' A, _ 5 77=)0_j.
Notes
ine impressed on bank
Shelving
ges in character of soil ✓
A terrestrial vegetation /
once of litter and debris
Wracking
t down, bent, or absent J
Sediment sorting
✓
Curbed or washed away
Scour
Deposition
e observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
✓
ige in plant community
Other:
I%Gdir.01 C�f'"•,o

USACE AID# — DWQ # — = . _-- (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET:
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: 2. Evaluator's name:__ _ 1) TR-NWW-5p
3. Date of evaluation: 7 ) 2v 4. Time of evaluation: . D`S
5. Name of stream: - i n ' ,�( 6. River basin:__
7. Approximate drainage area: �^�'� 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):�� D '
12. Subdivision name (if any):-
G..,;i ?.i - - 77.556611)* ^%% a72 ysZ'
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evalwiti +n (note nearby roads and landmarks < �;d :attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I-M
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: _ _...
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: A% Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged "/o Other t
22. Bankfull width:. 1 5- 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.]
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
�,1f 1,O
Evaluator's Signature /.� _ Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET TR-NWW-Sp
ECOREGION POINT'
MANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
I
0-5
0-4
0-5
tno flow or saturation = 0; stron.! flow = max lints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
0-6
0-4
0-5
-
3
n zone
— �iitits)
no buffer = 0, contLpo sawide buffer = max
4
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
( extensive dischar.:es = 0, no discharges = max p-Ants)
3
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
(no discharge = 0 spnn-,s, seeps wetlands, etc. = max ,Tints)
�.,
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
, t
`
(no flood(�lain = 0; extensive floodi7lsin = maac�rGrints
0-5
0-4
0-2
U_
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
(dee E entrenched = 0; fr� Fluent flooding = max points)
0-6
0-4
0-2
r
i
Presence of adjacent wetlands
r no wetlands = 0; lar:;e adjacent wetlands = max p rants)
9
0-5
0-4
0-3
y
Channel sinuosity
extensive channelization = 0 natural meander = max points}
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
3-
(extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment =max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
fine. homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0 y
0-4
0-5
3
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed &banks = max car;its)
""
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
�
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points
M
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
H
(no visible roots = 0: cl� n,c s-L pots throe hout = max rots)
�n
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
(substantial imp act _0; no evidence = max_ noints)
16
Presence of riffle- ol/n le- ool complexes
Po =
0 — 3
0 — 5
0 — 6
2
tno riffles/ripples or Ea I 0_ well -developed max points,)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
Z
F
(little, or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
.�
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
CF
J
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopypoints)
19
Substrate embeddeduess
NA*
0-4
0-4
(.deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0: common, numerous types = max pDints
21
Presence of amphibians
0— 4
0— 4
0— 4
O
(no evidence = 0: common, numerous I �- pC � = max Dints
0 22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous i!: pc:; =max omts
—
23 Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
2
t
I no evidence = 0: abundant evidence = max points-)
I 100
100
100
Total Points Possible
TOTAL SCML; (also enter on 11,1,rst
1%: ge)
Ak
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Dimensions
Width:
Height:
Depth water:
Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
TR-NWW-Sp
—� Site: )% �Y�/ Y --P
�a0 oa0
o
qj
m
Natural line
Change,
Destruction of t
Present
Vegetation matted di
Leaf litter disturl
Multiple o
Change
Notes
-
impressed on bank,
Shelving
in character of soil
arrestrial vegetation ✓
of litter and debris V%
Wracking
>wn, bent, or+abse'
G
Sediment sorting
)ed or washed away
V,
Scour I ✓
Deposition
bserved flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
in plant community
Other:

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Annlicant's name: !Te4-j :'X`7-11 2. Evaluator's name: / TR-NWW-5p
3. Date of evaluation: 7, )y
5. Name of stream:_ 5 ` (>5- !,W
7. Approximate drainage area: a- a O
9. Length of reach evaluated:
11. Site coordinates (if known,)): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): /0 % 21-0-
4. Time of evaluation:
6. River basin:
8. Stream order: 2-
10. County:
12. Subdivision name (if any)::
Longitude (ex.—77.556611):_ - / 7,0 9'l 237
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other _ _ - _
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel .Fork (if any
15. Recent weather conditions:
m
i -
16. Site conditions at time of visit: /V ,'
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters —Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: `b % Residential
% Forested
22. Bankfull width: ow_.__
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 21/6)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
A-b % Commercial % Industrial _% Agricultural
!% Cleared / Logged _% Other (
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): G
`Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 100/6) _Steep (>100/.)
=Frequent meander _Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):,,, 9 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature _ Date 1
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET TR-NWW-Sp
1:CQREGION POINT
RANG
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
S
d
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max oiiits
0-6
0-5
0-5
2
Evidence of past human alteration
~;extensive alteration = 0: no alteration = maxim>ints)
- — -- - - . -
3
it Pparian zone
0-6
0-4 1
0-5
no buffer = 0 continuous, wide buffer = maxi+oints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
I
(extensive discharges = 0: no discharges = max points)
F
5
Groundwater discharge
0- 3
0- 4
0- 4
2
(no discharge = 0, sprin , se,,ps wetlands etc. max nnints)
rV•a
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
(no flood lam = 0; extensive floodG�lain =max points 1
xx
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
f.dee,]1 entrenched - 0: frequent flooding = max pa pints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
no wetlands = 0; lar a adjacent wetlands = max G i, ,ints
9
0-5
0-4
0-3
Channel sinuosity
extensive channelization = 0: natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
Z
t extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment = max_2 oints )
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
�--
i fine, homoLrenous = 0; lar.:e, diverse sizes = max c�i_nts)
0-5
0-4
0-5
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
>I
i deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max 1xoi tits}
F-4
13
Presence of major bank failures
5
0-5
0-5
�
( severe erosion = 0: no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)0
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
no visible roots = 0: dense roots throw-,i3out = maxpoints)
rA
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max Points -
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
16
0-3
0-5
0-6
+:no riflles/rielrles or pools = 0: well -developed = max paints)
- _
d
l7
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
Z
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
(no shadim, vegetation = 0• continuous canopy = maxpoints)
19
NA*
0-4
0-4
-.--
Substrate embeddeduess
i deerbin_ embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
20
0-4
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0: common, numerous types = maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
01
s no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max aints)
__ . --Presence of fish
O 22
0-4
0-4
0-4
0.01 (no evidence = 0 common, numerous types = maxpoints)
.
Evidence of wildlife use
23
-"
0-6
0-5
0-5
�
i no evidence = 0: abundant evidence = max points)
......... . _-
.....
100
100
100
Total Points Possible
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on First page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

TR-NWW-6p
NV DWO Stream identification Form Version 4.11 5se,�i _ �I
Date: 7 ! 7- +'fv
ProjectlSite: ) �� t�1>�
Latitude: 331-- D 'OjG
Evaluator. 5W J. ' , w
County:
Longitude: -;7,7 08,070 _r
Total Points:
Stream isatleast intermittent ~l�.I�
Stream Determination (circie:que)_
Other
&
if 2 19 or perennial if z 30"
Ephemeral Intermittent'Perennia}-
e.g. Quad Name: /,,
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = I )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1."
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence.
0
1
�
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
422
3
8. Headcuts
°
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0'
0 5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
_
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No.- ...
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discuss s in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2---------------
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
3
14. Leaf litter
,� 1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
f0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
1Yes = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal ;? ` ]
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
;1 3.31
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
` 0
1
2 J
3
21, Aquatic Mollusks
0
1''
2
3
22. Fish
0
G 1
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
C 5.
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0 5�
1
1.5
25. Algae
0,
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 1]
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 3$ of manual.
Notes: . ,_ ,. Y►By� a y''[l:.
.,,w ,, dy _;
Sketch:
5 l/T` -P)

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions
Width: m
Height: 0�00 oa0i
Depth water: , �,i �
Natural I
Chan
Destruction
Pros
Vegetation matte
Leaf litter dis
Multipi
Cha
TR-NWW-6p
'
Site: j)-AA Al Vim/ 5w-
1
Notes
ine impressed on bank V
Shelving
ges in character of soil ,/
A terrestrial vegetation V
Prose
of litter and debris
Wracking
d down, bent, or bs
Sediment sorting i/
turbed or washed away V
Scour
Deposition
e observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
nge in plant community /
Other:

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET011.
Provide the following .information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: �1 yy _. _ 2. Evaluator's name: '_�r /"! TR-NWW-6p
3. Date of evaluation: l y/± 2� 4. Time of evaluation: ) 3
5. Name of stream:_j.6. River basin: ✓'fir
7. Approximate drainage area: H 4D 71� ,464rz�'�J 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated:----- _ -- 10. County:__
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): _.._ I-un�itude(ex.-77.556611):
Topo Sheel ; (irr< < i serial) Photo/ S Other GIS Other
Method location determined (circle): (GPVS13. Location of reach under evalua ' (note nearby roads ilea! h mdmark and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: 7'Y,►"+ �F; i �I"�"'
16. Site conditions at time of visit:��
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
!Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential % Commercial % Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged "/o Other 1
22. Bankfull width:. _ _ 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight 9 Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): L Comments: ..
Evaluator's Signature _ ----- _ Date_!. y' _
This channel evaluation?, i'orm is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
1

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
TR-NWW-6p
. . . . . ... ......
FCOREGION POINT
R.AINGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
- —
SCORE
Mountain
Coastal Piedmont
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
O no flow or saturation = 0; Strom, flow = maxpoints)S
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
(extensive alteration = 0: no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max ints
ff--__..
- ....._._ _.
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
2
no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
w
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
2..
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = maxpoints)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = maxpoints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; lar a adacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
2
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max _points)_
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment = max iomts
NA*
0-4
0-5
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
f fine, homof_,enous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
_ Evidence of channel incision or widening
12
0-5
0-4
0-5
-
ks �, E rits mc�s 0; sta e ban
-- = max p
13
nce major nk failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
- ble banks = maxpoints)
severe erosion 0, no eros onsta
m
14
1 Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
F
J , no visible roots = 0: dense roots throw hout = maxpoints)
0-4
0-5
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
substantial act =0; no evidence-maxpoints)0-5
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
16
0-3
0-5
0-6
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0� well -developed = max points)
l7
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
f little or no habitat = 0; fret ,uent, vaned habitats = max points!
Canopy coverage over streambed
18
0-5
0-5
0-5
(no shadini, ve;-;etation = 0• continuous canopy = max omts)
19
NA*
0-4
0-4
Substrate embeddedness
(deePI} embedded = 0; loose structure = max'
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
20
0-4
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0-common, numerous tv[ (cs_= max points)
21
Presence of am hibiaais
p
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
I_
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
.._
O 22
Presence of fish
4-4
0-4
0-4
-2-
+,no evidence = 0- common, numerous types = max points)
__
23
Evidence of wildlife use
�
0-6
0-5
0-5
2.
{no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
l00
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first
gage)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

TR-NWW-7p
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: : �
ProjectfSite: 1YP4 Ahd,e,
Latitude:
Evaluator. �M�I ,;
County: A:wnA
Longitude:--)7.pk) 5-fig
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circls.Qn�)
Other A'�w L
if z 19 or i erennial if 2 30* Z
Ephemeral Intermittent P6rennigl
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = (S' a5 1
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank rr
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalvmg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
23:.
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
-_3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
b
' 14)
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3 �r
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = (D
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2,
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
M
2
3
14. Leaf litter .
1
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
"b
0.5
mil
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
{`O. 5
"1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes -3
C. Biolo (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
'Ci
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks k,h ; _�•-
0
: T
2
3
22. Fish t , : i Fl ,,
0
0.5
1,
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
11
1.5
25. Algae
0
' .5 ,
-9
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACV�0.75; OBL =1. .� Other = 0
*perennial streams may -.also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: _
W , _
l._.
Sketch:

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
TR-NWW-7p
Dimensions b("
,�Q' Site:
Width: �P�/'G�1MA
�� m -- ---.-- — .
_. _...
Height:a�i
Depth water: j 0 NOteS
Natural I
Chan
Destruction i
Prose
Vegetation matte(
Leaf litter disl
Multipb
Chai
ine impressed on bank
Shelving
ges in character of soil
A terrestrial vegetation V%
ince of litter and debris
Wracking
I down, bent, or absent
Sediment sorting
Curbed or washed away
✓
Scour
Deposition
e observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
ige in plant community
Other:

USACE AID#
DWQ#
TR-NWW-7p
Site # (indicate on attached map)
ul STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
0�1-
DA P 4 1
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: //
1. Applicant's name: Wi t4OW &2A 2. Evaluator's name: J" ^0*
3. Date of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: uT 4f I{/ '55AF
7. Approximate drainage area:
4. Time of evaluation: VIA-W _x
6. River basin: J" '
8. Stream order: )S _
9. Length of reach evaluated:
10. County: Gy;
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): t37 ' I !-f 5G 1
12. Subdivision name (if any):
_ Long,'I�i-1 ..i ex.—77.556611): — 7 / , t>tp S7 F
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GI'• Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evalu Harr note nearby r��J .-a,14-brio attach map identifying stream(s) location):
r
p Y
14. Proposed channel work (if
n
15. Recent weather conditions: , i,
16. Site conditions at time of visit: /Tp` ".y
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: l fDO% Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other �
u.W
22. Bankfull width: 1 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank)
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): >W Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date_._._ .
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

TR-NWW-7p
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT V1 ORKSHEET
FC OREGIO !'f)[;NT
T2r�ivC...
is CHARACTERISTICS ERISTIC S
_._ —
- —
;SC ORl?
6 stoI
piedniont
Mountain
Presence of 11or, i persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 _ !
U -
S
pio 110%% or saluralion 0. strong 11(m max points)
, E,, idence of (last human alteration
(extensive alteration 0, no alteration ntax points)
Riparian zone
0.0
4 - t
li -
(no Buller (): contiguous. wide butler max lxiint,)
'
F ' 1 � •e If i utrirnt ur chemie•tl clisch•tr �cs
temensive Jkcharges p; no discharg. max F. points) 1 f /
t:nlundwattr rliticharH
Q (no dischares (!_springs.. arcl)a- Netlanda, eta mux points)
u presence of adjacent noodplain ,
t- n 0-4 t) 4 • -
�„ (no lloodplain 0eminisiku Iloodplain max point-,)
Entrenchment / tlondplain access 0 - � U � tdeepl} entrenched Q; frequent 1ltwdina num point,►
Presence of adjacent wetlands ,
- (lit) \+etlands il; lui�se adtaretl( kwtlaucls max putnt5)
g Channel sinuositl ft _ 0-4 ()
s lememerc dumnelization 0. mtlural meander Inax points)
Ile Sediment input (} _ t) - 0-4
(e\tensi\•e deposition 0, little or no sediment max points)
Size S diti ersity of channel bed substrate _
I (tine. homogenous 0: large. di%erse sizes mu\ points) N''� 0•1
.........
_ -- -
-� F ,. idence of channel incision or w'idenim,
ldcLply incised - 0, siable bed K hanks max points
Presence of major bank failures tt 0- :
'~ 1'(severe erosion ()_ no erosion. siable banks maxPoints)
pqitnnt dcptb and clensih nn hanks
1.1 U• o--t o-j �.
4 (no v isible routs - 0: dense routs throuLhout • max points)
1m tee ht agriculture, livestock. or timber roduelion
l5 p' p (y.;
isubstantial impact U; no r4rdencc nlaa points
It, Presence of riffle -pool ripple -print complews
(no rit'lles°ripplcs or pools (l: %ell-dl:vdoped may Ioirtl17 s)
little or no liahitat O: t'rc cent. varied habitats t _
I labitat conll)lcsity
F., ( y ttcix points)
m 1 Clu
mp) coverage over strearnhed � ti
(no shading, iege{alion - 0: continuous canup} maxpormti) U - U 1) -
Substrate embeddedne,
tdeepl\ embedded - 0: loose structure max)
Presence of stream invertebrates (sec mwe 4)
(110 e% idenck 0, common. nutn<rou, t\ pes nra\ poems)
y I t Presence of amphibians p - t 0-4 11-
p - (no c\ idener (.i, eculunan. nunlerotiti it pc, relax points)
1 rescnce of fish 11 4 ti 4 {) 1
(,lit) c% idea+ e U, t tuullum, ttunt4ruus i\ pes niax p„lots!
Evidence of wildlife use
1 1[10 evideiice It. abluldalli C\idelux Ilia\ polllt's)
'1'mal Poinis Possible Ior) ION 1Ot1
T[)'IAL SCORE (also ewer on first page'l 3
' I he+c characteristics are n„i asse>sed ill cos<lal ,trcaills

TR-NWW-9i
01
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Pj - L, 0
Date: D 0 OG a111
ProjectlSite:Trep �t(1P�-
Latitude: 3.f f f � 72U
Evaluator. ''%r p/t/�/�r.� "f �
County: PAyr 1
Longitude: --7T j) t>?,`
Total Points:
Stream Deterntinatio. ircleone)
Other /fLw& .1A1e
Stream is at least intermittent
if z 19 or perennial if a 30*
Ephemeral 1ntermitteh Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = y 1
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0, `
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalveg
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
/,
if
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
51
2
3
5. Active/relictfloodplain
i 2
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
i
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No'= {;j
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
0
1
1)
2
2
3
14. Leaf litter
'_1
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
OS
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
res = y
C. Biolo (Subtotal = -7, �^
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
[
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
Q,
1 '
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0,
1
2
3
........
22. Fish
0
(6.
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
()
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
'i7
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0 j
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other _-0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: 6L 4� _
POW (5 /(Lmt e )
'1 Vr Q4 "1 l' �� U. �
� f�Pv�ta f� 1
�► � -0 �, �2

iN u L W I t stream io entincanon r orm v ersion 14.1 i
Date: a 0 V C Project/Site: TrRt-"- I?
Evaluator. �� f�✓SUr.✓ Aytpe^ County: Cr' vev
Total Points: rr� Stream Determination circle one)
Stream is at least intermittent �V Ephemeral lntermittentPerennial
if z 19 or �-renniai' if?- 30*
P sf--- %A/
P 5E - D C TR-NWW-9i
Latitude:
Longitude: -%%
Other AW A", At
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
V Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalmg
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
V
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
"v0'
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N =17
1 Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R Hudrelnciv [Rijhtntnl = 1r 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
i'3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
OD
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
QiD
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Y fs =
t^. Rinlnmi f.qiihtntni= .J 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
�:'
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3'
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
j./
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 .'
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
D,9
1
1.5
23. Crayfish.
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0 ';
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
&
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: hIN1(1�t€(leJt����lcCl�
I
t 5 lit? t��� y�e �91u(-vf- F C,,ecr(T
�j �tC�v+o1.
iO_V , 014_
LA- C/r--

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions �
��r nTR-NWW-9i
Width: 3 v �Q' Site: !/
Height: �00
Depth water: Notes
Natural line impressed on bank
Shelving
Changes in character of soil
Destruction of terrestrial vegetation x
Presence of litter and debris
Wracking
x
Vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
Sediment sorting
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away
Scour
Deposition
Multiple observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining 54,
Change in plant community X
Other:
kmr-e,," 5V cqK� l/Pbvr 5/4/"?c4
Ic9W(,— ewr-v 69cpw-'%-5{—etwl
ui u Vey k t C.d e5
....... .........
�•--
3 a' UvrJe (� r w� r� l L✓of l j I

TR-NWW-10i
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 15W �- 5w-� _1b
Date: �i► `�jQ, zip
Project/Site: T04
Latitude: 3�, 10 G 17r/
Evaluator. o,W - (�tqn�
county: Aiq yT
Longitude: -71.
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent �',�
Stream Determination,_ (circle one)
Ephemeral lntermittenerennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if z 30*
I
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = j
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank f f Ge
is
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0 ?
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex, riffle -pool, step -pool,
rip le- pool sequence
0
tY
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
}:'
1
-2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
p 0.5
No 09
1 1.5
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discuss9ns in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal= ))t-0 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
_. '`
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
5✓
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
C. Biolow (Subtotal = 6t" ) °
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
n
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
'0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
2
3
22. Fish
0
/"
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
ZP`0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
25. Algae
0
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL - .5 ther = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
_� 11 j
Sketch: -- AvAi SQ ei
-b I
1?��1
q ,
q�,,/�"t

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
TR-NWW-10i
Dimensions � site: !o�/
Width:�
Height:
Depth water:
Natural line impressed on bank
Changes in character of soil
Destruction of terrestrial vegetation
Presence of litter and debris
Vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ,
Sediment sorting
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away j
Multiple observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
Change in plant community
Notes

USACE AID#
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
7 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment S4�s SL
_.
1. Applicant's name:__ ___Of WW ; -i"/'1 _.._. 2. Evaluator's name: ?^
TR-NWW-l0i
3. Date of evaluation: x"-' 1 4. Time of evaluation:
_
5. Name of stream: 1AT `' M r�� _ 6. River basin: N W'� F-
7. Approximate drainage area:_ I190- l2-0 4rm<5 8. Stream order: /-'2-
9. Length of reach evaluated: -__
10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3', % 0 6 % 7 ; Longitude (ex.-77.556611): 77 09 i 2 Z _.._
Method location determined (circle): PS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying streams) location):,
- 10666C !�,1- Ott , all
14. Proposed channel work (if
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit: nr ' r1IGtl
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 iTidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I-M
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 5b % Residential
% Forested
22. Bankfull width:..--
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
50 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Cleared / Logged _% Other
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):—�C E t
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ✓ Flat (0 to 20/6) _Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ✓ Straight _Occasional bends Frequent meander _Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Y
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's Signature aatlo� 4rn01 Date b l 3D 110
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET TR-NWW-10i
EC.0REa0N
POINT
RANGE
#
CHEARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0-5
PiAmont
0-4
Mountain
0-5
_( no flow or saturation = 0; stroni; flow = max E o ints a
'
0-5
0-5
0
_
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
0-5
0
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
(no buffer = 0,contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive discharges = 0: no discharges = max points) —
5
0-3
0-4
0-4
Groundwater discharge
no discharge = 0; springs, seeps. wetlands, etc. = max points)
V
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
y~,
(no flood plain = 0• extensive floodplain = m_ax points)
0
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
0
a
(deeplyentrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
$
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0- 4
0 - 2
(no wetlands = 0_ lar:-,e adjacent wetlands = max p, pints )
-_ —n�0,
0 - 5
0 - 4
0 - 3
9
Channel sinuosity
extensive channelization = natural meander =max i�oints j
10
_,
Sediment input
_ _
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive de position= 0; little or no sediment = max lints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
- -
fine. homogenous = 0: large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
5
i de .ply incised = 0: stable bed & banks = max pqmts)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
5
a
d severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable_ banks = max points i
14
_
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
i no visible roots = 0 dense roots throughout = max points)
0-5
0-4
0-5
15�Impact
by agriculture livestock, or timber production
d substantial impact�: no evidence =max paints) _
0-3
0-5
0-6
O
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well -developed = max points)
E
Q' r 17
1 iabitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
�
(little or no habitat = 0, frequent, varied habitats = max points)
1$
Canopy coverage over streambed
''
0-5
0-5
0-5
�
(no shading: vegetation = 0• continuous expo = max oints
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0- _loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0- common. numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O
(no evidence = n: conlnlon. nioenerous types = max points)
O 22 Presence offish 0-4 0-4 0-4
evidence = 0; common. numerous types = max points)
_(no
Evidence of wildlife use
23 0-6 0-5 0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max [)oi tits)
Total Points Possible 100 100 too
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

TR-NWW-12i
NV DWn Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: v
Project/Site: j� �
Latitude: 3s� /0 90 7
Evaluator. � r 'SAY►"
County:
Longitude:_ 7� t9y �59
Total Points:
Stream Detenninatibrr circle one)
Other Np*v' ?---m
if 2� j
if � f ! aw perennia! if z 30*
if 19 rpere least perennial
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = I )
'r'
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank +
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel alone thalmg
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
®
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
r
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
�,
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
1
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
Ox
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussers in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 'E o )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3;
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
fl
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
I Q)1
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high vrater table?
No = 0
Yes,w
C. Biology (Subtotal = "'i ) )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2 t
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1. "
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
:'0P
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
'6.,'>.
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
4.51
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
..5,
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
"T_ 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL -' 1 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: )Mn0)v I $(f' -�
e
%� lum) :°'

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
TR-NWW-12i
Dimensions �� Site: �rt9v�`/� j ! S P -,D /
Width: Z� fl
Height:
Depth water: 6 + h.�, Notes
Natural I
Chan
Destruction
Pres
Vegetation matte
Leaf litter dis
Multipl
Char
ine impressed on bank
Shelving
ges in character of soil
ence
d
turbed
A terrestrial vegetation
of litter and debris
Wracking
down, bent, or Ai snot
Sediment sorting
or washed away
Scour
Deposition i
e observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
ge in plant community
Other:

USACE AID# _._ DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name:._ 2. Evaluator's name: 5M I i ! / A y. t 0 TR-N W W-12i
3. Date of evaluation: D(P ` l7 j % 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream:.._ _ U �Y 'i a Ve-Y 6. River basin: N e us
7. Approximate drainage area: — 2 Q" W 4 -� ____ 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated:—- 10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):_ _
( ) 3 s, J 9 zJ l L gib-77.556611): —77, O %6l2 31
Latitude ex.34.872312 : L�,i� a ex.
Method location determined (circle): `GPS Topo Sheet (Ortho (AerialL PI i)to,1C1S Other GIS Other_
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: C`''i' M(A l
16. Site conditions at time of visit: VU ", `
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: f0 % Residential W% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other t
22. Bankfull width: _ _ _ _ _ _ 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): (0"
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ✓ Flat (0 to 2%) ____Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (> 100/6)
25. Channel sinuosity: v1 Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): __
Evaluator's Signaturea (t.l" � Date (0 30
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET TR-NWW-12i
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Mountain
Coastal PiedOINTIZANGE
mont
0-5 0-4
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max pints
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0— 6
0— 5
0— 5
0
.
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0: contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges =max pints)
5
Groundwater discharge
0— 3
0-4
0-4
3'
(no dischar e = 0 springs . seetas, wetlands, etc. = max points)
~
6
a
0-4
0-4
0-2
0
— extensive -—oodplain
(no floodpPresence
ain 0• extensive flood ..lain =max Hints)
7
0-5
0-4
0-2
Entrenchment / floodplain access
(deet)l} entrenched _= 0; frequent flooding = maxpoints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0: large adjacent wetlands = max pints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
V
0—
0-4
0-4
Q
10
Sediment input
extensive d osition= 0; little or no sediment = max points
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-5
--
0-4
(fine, homoyenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
`
(deeply i
incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints:l
13
Presence of major bank failures
,
0-5
0-5
0-5
G
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max ints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0 — 3
0-4
0-5
2
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
i
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
ILI
riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-develo ed = maxpoints)
F(no
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max o�mts)
1
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
n
G..
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max oints)
x"
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
---��
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; = common, numerous t pes = max ppints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
C
tno evidence = 0. common, numerous types = maxpoints)
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = y I: coinnnon, nurncruus types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0: abundant evidence = max pomts
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
3
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

TR-NWW-13i
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 5 ����2U
Project/Site: ( ���
Latitude:
Evaluator. �& ?L l r f `eta
County: C r,U_
Longitude: --7 . D9l 7�
Total Points:
Stream Determ'i ation i c rcle one)
Other (IlFw )WeA/
Stream is at least intermittent 7
if a 19 arZ rennlal if 30* f- k
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
I e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank_;
1
2
3,,/
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1 -
` 2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence
0
�
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
4
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
Cp
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
._: j
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
(' -
3
8. Headcuts _
0)
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
artficial ditches are not rated; see disc ussi s in manual
B. Hvdroloov [Subtotal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
C 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
J_
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0,
0-5.-
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = ]
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
' __2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
Cb i
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
t7
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
G
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other :F-0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: l,,�L� V�-�"' �- I �U
"Tr.5
� ! ' tA-

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions TR-NWW-13i
Width: Site: - f 5 --- --
Height: Z - 44- aQ
Depth water: z_ , �,� �o ��� Notes
Natural I
Chan
Destruction 4
Prese
Vegetation matte(
Leaf litter disc
Multipl
Chai
1
ine impressed on bank
Shelving
ges in character of soil
)f terrestrial vegetation
ince of litter and debris
Wracking
I down, bent, or absent
Sediment sorting
Curbed or washed away
Scour
Deposition
e observed flow events
Bed and banks jF
Water staining
ige in plant community
Other:
e

USACE AID#
DWQ
TR-NWW-13i
S L
Site # (indicate on attached map)
M
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following
`i�nformation for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: VV LW �.t. ✓A I r f(A4 2. Evaluator's name: -
3. Date of evaluation:: 30 ` .,. b 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: V �*V r rat: (M� 6. River basin: v-
7. Approximate drainage area: r 8. Stream order: t
9. Length of reach evaluated: c 100 i` t 10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): Longitude (ex.—77.556611): 1 7 •y I '� ! _
Method location determined (circle): PS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluati note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location): _
14. Proposed channel work (if any): I
15. Recent weather conditions: M. fir l a L. 1 '/i r G
16. Site conditions at time of visit: f /c/ l
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 1P % Residential
_% Forested
22. Bankfull width:
24. Channel slope down center f stream: _Flat (0 to 2%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight ,-bccasionaI bends
_% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
• Cleared / Logged _% Other (
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1-7
_Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
_Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
c.-
Total Score (from reverse): Comments
Evaluator's Signature `�-' 1 fi Date
This channel evaluation form i ntended to lie used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

_fc_�") V'r
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
i1 CHARACTERISTICS
1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
Oct flow or saturation 0, strong flow max points)
Fti idence of past human alteration
(extensive alteration 0; no alteration nnax points)
Riparian zone
�' (no butler _. 0; contiguous, aide huf'fer - max points)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
(extensive discharges 0; net discharges max points)
inn discharge 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. max plaints)
6
Presence of adjacent flood;slain
.r.ayy
(no floodplain_,-0_ extensive Iloadplain - ►nax.- points)
<_
Entrenchment / tloodplain access .
(deeply entrenched - 0; frequent flooding - max points)
Presence of adjacent wetiands
(no wetlands 0; large adjacent wetlands max points)
y
Channel sinuosity
(extensive channelization 0, natural meander max points)
l0
— - -—
Sediment input
(extensive deposition 0; little or tic) sediment ma\ points)
TR-NWW-13i
CCORE LION POINT
RANGE
— _
....
SC'C)R#,
C`onsti Piedmon_t
Mountain
0-5 0-4
0-5
2
0-6 0-5
U- 5
c► i 0-4
0-4
S
0-:
0-4
0-4
0-4 0 4
0•2
Q
0-5 0-4
0-2
O
0-5 0-4
0- 3
0
0 - S 0-4
0-4
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
11 I NA* 0-4 0-56 Alm
(tine, homogenous 0; large, diverse: s►zcs max points)
0,5
0,4
I, Evidence of channel incision or widening
(deeply- incised .- 0; stable bed & banks : mats: points►
l
_Presence of major bank failures
0-S
{)-
,,a
(severe erosion 0; net erosion. stable banks max points)
14
Root depth and density on hangs
0-3
0-4
�
F
(no visible roots 0; dense routs throughout maxpoints)
(►-,
f1_4
fsImpact
byagriculture, livestoek, or timber Production
(substantial impact 0; no evidence nnux points)
Presence of riffle-poollripple-pool complexes
I h
0-3
0- i
(no riffles+ripples or pools 0: well-dcvclorvd naax points)
0-6
() - b
Ei
17
Habitat complexity
(little or no habitat - 0; frequent, varied habitats max points)
1R
Canopy coverage over so reatnbed _
t
0-S
0.;
x
(no shading vegetation - 0; continuous canopy max points)
_ f
19
Substrate embeddeduess
NA*
0 - 4
,p -' ()` loose stnacturc
t , )
m invertebrates (sec a e 41
.,0 Presence of tread page
(no evidence 0; common_ numerous t3 pes - max points)
Y
_ 1
..._...__ �m.
Presence of amphibians
t) • •1
0-4
p
(no ev idenee - 0; common, numerous types max points)
G
1
of fish
f0 4
0 4
�"_
(na c� idence 0; commun, numerous types max points)
- —
Evidence of wildlife uce
0 G
(no evidence 0. abundant evidence maa% points
Total Points Possible
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (.also enter tin first
paagc)
* (hese characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
0-S
0-5
3
z
0-5
S
0-G
/.
0-6
0-5
2
0-4
0-S
0-4
d
0- t
Q
0 S
100
-3
2

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 ram_
Date: f' p- Project/Site:u° ('
Evaluator. L,� b County: C
r'ah1.ti1
Total Points: Stream Det . tioe(circle one)
Stream is at least intermittent ; Epheme I Intermittent° Perennial
if?: 19 or Perennial if? 30" i
�I N TR-NWW-14i
Latitude:
Longitude: _14 nggqq 'l F-
Other ... f� j L'A eN
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18- Continuity of channel bed and bank
1
-
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
a
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0 -
1 1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
n
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent.alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headc uts• .
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
r'0`
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N, o = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = t m
.12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
?`
3.
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
14. Leaf litter
_
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris line _ _ ._..
g s or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
__- - _----...--
b
. --
_-- .......
1
--
1.5
__..
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
G_ Biolociv (Subtotal = f., ) -
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
`1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
(0
1
2
3
22. Fish
q
0.5
1
1.5
23,. Crayfish
(0)
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBI = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
7J

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions
TR-NWW-14i
Width: 'z-� +�� Site:-------
m
Height: 4 ,z c40 aQ;
Depth water: _ 1, Notes
,
Natural 1
Chan
Destruction
Pres
Vegetation matte
Leaf litter dis
Multipl
Char
ine impressed on bank
Shelving
ence
d
turbed
✓
ges in character of soil
of terrestrial vegetation
of litter and debris
,
Wracking
down, bent, or absent
Sediment sorting
or washed away
I
Scour
y
Deposition
✓
e observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
ge in plant community j
Other:
V
V

USACE AID#.
DWQ#.
TR-NWW-14i
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: t w i n+.�r-� w _ "^-�/ _ 2. Evaluator's name: R' 7 " U,
3. Date of evaluation: c " - Z Q Lp 4. Time of evaluation: I (�
5. Name of stream: V b T "'" 6. River basin: e 0 s,
7. Approximate drainage area: V • o T ✓, .I 2 _ 8. Stream order: 1
9. Length of reach evaluated: 70 'L 10. County: C ra4 ✓�
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): _ J . 0� I Longitude (ex.—77.556611):� — 7 f
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other_
13. Location of reach under evaluation note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream/(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions:_
16. Site conditions at time of visit:__w
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:__.
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: O% Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged to % Other ( 1&-ldl 34 Of `/'
22. Bankfull width: 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center stream: _' Flat (0 to 2%) ._.Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0•in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comm nts: 'r�' �� S'�(ay✓1 Utr
t] L��Z C FEW D ►�s
Evaluator's Signature 1 Date__ (4 _ 30— 20 2v
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

TR-NWW-14i
STREAM QUAL1TV ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET S
CHARACTERISTICS
r�'i)RFC,iON
POINT
RANGE
SCORN.
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
2
(no floes• or saturation 0; strong flow - max points)
_.,
�
_
_
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6 �
0-5
0- 5
I
(extensive alteration 0; no alteration - max paints)
_
Riparian cone
0-6
0-4
0-
(�
(no buffer - U; contiguous, wide buffer - max lx,ints)
4U-5
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
-
0-�#
U-�l
s-
(extensive discharges 0; no discharges ntax points)
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-
0-4
0-4
tno discharge - 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. - max paints)
QPresence
0-4
0-4
ti
ofadjacentfloodplain
0-2
rn
(no floodplain = 0: extensive floodplain - rnax points) W
_- -
Pxr
Entrenchment / ftondplain access
?
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding - max paints)
�-
0-2
13
Presence Of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0
(no wetlands =- O; large adjacent wetlands max points)
_
9
Channel sinuosity
0- 5
0- 4
0-3
D
(extensive channelization 0, natural meander maxpoints)
-
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive deposition 0; little or no sediment max points)
_
d,
Size. & diversity of channel bed substrate
�
(line, homogenous 0; large, diverse sires - max points)
t) - 5
0-4
1,
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
e lied - - max points,)
Weeply- incised banks p
�(severeperosion
_
__ -- -- ----
sencc of into ar bank failures
Presence �
-
(1-i
tl-S
tl-5
-
act erosion stable banks max ornt
0; p s)._-__
_
pa
14
Root depth and density on banks -
-
- -
0-3
-
tl--I
0-5
F,
(no visible roots - 0; dense routs throughout max paints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
[) -'
0 - d
(1-5
(substantial impact = 0: no cvidrnce max point~)
-
-
-�
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
W.
16
0-3
0-5
0-6
(no ritileslripples or pools = 0: well -developed - max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
O-G
E+
�
U-h
E.,
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats ' max points)
_
QI
l;
Canopy coverage over streambed
tl - —
-� (9 - 5
0. 5
x
(no shading; vegetation = 0; continuous canopy - max points)
NA*
Iy
Substrate embeddeducss
0-4
0-4
'Vt�
(deepl) embedded = U; loose stnrcture - ntax)
- -
0-5
- _-_
0-5
C?
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
(no evidence - 0; contnton, numerous types = rnaN points)
>
I
Presence of amphibians
0.4
I
0-4
0-4
p
(no evidence 0, common, numerous types max paints)
a
Presence of fish - -
4
0-4
0-4
no evidence U; c.nmmun. numerous to tes max points)
'
23_
(1 b
• _ . ---
U-5
:y
_
Evidence of wildlife use
0- 5
5
no evidence - 0; abundant evidence=max points)
-'
T
`
Total Points Passible
100
100
100
dJ
T TOTAL SCORE (also enter till first
page)
` /
' `these characteristics are not assessed in coastal Streams

Date:
NC
TR-NWW-16i 4c,_
cc't ' �Y
Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 P/. �d _74"
l / V Projectlsite: Al" TZ" t l`th : kLatitude:] '� mac. 2 N
Evaluator. County Longitude: -
�a ion r�wG� -1 _ 7_t107105
G z
Total Points: Stream Deterrninatior (circle one) V Other
Stream is at least intermittent ,. Ephemero intermittent Perfnnial I e.g. Quad Name:
me:
if t ��
19 or perennial if 2 30"
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
r
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18. Continuity of channel bed and bank
[ 0
1 -
_ 22
Y 2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
Q1 !
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0 _
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
0
0
0„%
1
-r-
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
9. Grade control
0_.'
0.5
1
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
1. artificial ditches are not rated; see discussifxrs in manual
B_ Hvdrolo❑v (Suhtntal = Q, )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3 .
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
- Yes = 3
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = 1.4 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed)
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0'
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
C01)
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
)
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
64-
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0)
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OR = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
u

TR-NWW-16i
Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions f A
,��► Site:
Width: m ----- — --—
Height: 1 0�00 oa�� m
Depth water: n _ \ �Notes
Natural line
Changes
Destruction of to
Presence
Vegetation matted do
Leaf litter disturb
Multiple of
Change
impressed on bank
;
L�
Shelving
in character of soil
rrestrial vegetation
V: }
of litter and debris
t, /
Wracking
wn, bent, or absent
Sediment sorting
ed or washed away
Scour
,
Deposition
iserved flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
in plant community
G
I
Other:

USACE AID#-
DWQ #,
TR-NWW-16i
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: 44 +I s�r� �7r q r4r,Lr 2. Evaluator's name: tDpti.i,/ Aa e
3. Date of evaluation: -P I -2P7A
5. Name of stream:y ( -a Tf- - 2 -V-�
7. Approximate drainage area: 0 . t h.12
9. Length of reach evaluated: 2C>00 411' ,k
4. Time of evaluation:_ _ 10 ' Z!�—
6. River basin: f V —Fa > I-? -
8. Stream order: I
10. County: tt'� (JAy-e ►\-
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): r�
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3) �� ��� 7 1 Longitude (ex.—77.556611):
Method location determined (circle): GP Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evalua t� on to nearby roads and landmarks and attach map id/entifying stream(s) location):
flF. _ r h�G.ALl. 1 V�f: I`e ! Ro
14. Proposed channel work (if
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential [ 00 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
% Forested
22. Bankfull width: -,5--
24. Channel slope down center of stream: L_Flat (0 to 2%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ✓ Straight Occasional bends
% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): �-
___Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
_Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): D
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is inte ded to be used on y as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

ft TR-NWW-16i
STREAM QUALITYASSESSMENT 4VORKSHEET
('1I [�A("i"1?KIS'TI('ti EC OREGIO'N POINT RANGE
- -- --- _
t'rrastal 1'iednlout Mountain
i Presence or floi% i persistent pools in stream t) - o - 4 (1 - c
tim fluty or,art11111ion 0. Strung IIONl ma\ points)
E: Idence of past human alteration 0. 6 t) ;
" (emensm: alteration 0. no HIteration max paints)
Riparian /one t► t
(no huller 0: r:ontignous %vide huller max pains)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
(extensive discharges 0; no disch r-es nim puittl,) i
._ r e_ .._ _ -- ---- -----
a Groundwater discharge tt -
(no di,,:hargc (1; sptiugs, wcps, \velland,, ctt. max ptuntsI
Q t, -- Presence of adjacent tloodplain T 3 o !
V) (nu lluodplain = 0: em nskC flaudplain Ina\ point.)
Entrenchment / noodplain access 11 ;
(deepl} crltienclied 0, frequent flikiding max paint,)
Presence of adjacent wetlands II rr
(no %cthinds t): lut'Z 'Idiacent %etlatldS leas points)
0- .(
(I
0..1
o-a
0-4
0--1
p 0 4
U
0
0 4
0-�
0 4
0-2
y
10
Channel sinuosih
(extensive Chamnclll.ation 0: 11"nurill 11mulder max p(111115)
Sediment inilul
textensivc deposition 0; hale or no sediment num prosiest
(t - ~
() . 4
NA*
1 I Size & div`ersits of channel bed s ihstrrate
(fine, homogenous (); tar°1wc diverse sires ma\ points)
19 E %idence or channel incision or i►•idcning
"1nk,
tdce lv inciacd) () table bed banksmax (palest,►
p
� - --- _
hank
Presence of ma tunes
l'
iseverc erosion ! . till crt . is n. t.lhle banks max pomt5)
pp Ia Root depth and densitN' on haul.\
lI .
Q too ti.ihl+ root- 1) dense root, throughout . max paints)
•�
Impact h) agriculture, livestoei;, or tinnier production
_
15
tsuhsrantiat impact (1, no evidence ma\ point,)
o
1 h
Presence of riffle-pooilripple-pool contp lv%es
0 t
(no ril'tics ripples or pook 0. "ell -developed than points)
17
[�
Habitat complexity
0-6
F(little
or no hahuat 0: fretluent- varied habitats nma, prints)
m
n'ricontiuuge r,uvreamlled
,
1't
fall sll.ldul � � ittati rIUIOP\ Itla\ polnis)
lu
Subrtrale embeddedncss
NA'
I (decph embedded 0. louse structure ma\ )
It - a
�(t Presenci. of stream in't erlebrates f sec paged)
(no t'%idt:net 0, common. nunivr sUS 1) pt+ rtlat 11oln1c)
,)
Presence of an,phihians
t) t
1nu e\ idencc 0. CUI1 mon, 1111111crous types Imm ptrr1115)
��
f - Presence of fish0f
'�
fall cv idencc U. cunnuou, mtmcr„u, Ir pc. max Poinis)
1
Evidence elf %"iftllift Iise
0 t:+
1111� to Whet (1, abulldmit evidence Ilia\ pointO
1
t
Total Points Possilile
It)t)
TOTAL SCORE' (alit) enter on fir
-,I pa
Lc)
111C.'e c•haracterislics are not asse,sed in coastal Streams
0-a
n- 11
0-4
0-4
0-4
0-?
t)-a
11. b
o
tl - it
o "i
mm
Ma
1(tt) Gam'"
JU
I

TR-NWW-17i /� S
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Project/Site: ilk, �%
Latitude: '(,?5-
Evaluator. Q,��� ,
County: CinC
Longitude:-77�.-0?67Z
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent �'%/ zn 1-7
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other >fFt,/ ►Weiz
if? 19 or perennial if z 30* (/� I
Ephemer�flntermittent . Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
C" t
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = J �
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
V- Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
7
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1 +
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence
0
/ _-�
�✓
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
(-1)
2
3
5. Activelrelictfloodplain
Q.
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
01
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0•
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5,
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
i
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
" artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal= 1a
1' t'resence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Ir,on oxidizing bacteria
0
1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 '
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or riles
17. Soil -rased evidence of high water table?
C_0
0.5
1
1.5
No = 0
(-. Yes = 3 ,
C. Biolociv (Subtotal = -I.,
18. Fibrous roots in streambed a
3
2
.1.
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0'
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
<D,; J
1
2
3
22. Fish --
0
0.5
1 .
1.5
23. Crayfish
__0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
.0
0.5
1
1.5�
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1 f;
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual .---
Notes:
Sketch: 3,141- �` � , 1- fcc+,"„ � � a �'
i J S 1 -1411' 44-zl

TR-NWW-17i
Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions
Width: Ct -
Height: t ` 4 �4o -tQ
Depth water: �0 �0 �q-
Natural line
Changes
Destruction of to
Presence
Vegetation matted do
Leaf litter disturb
Multiple ok
Change
Site: ------- ---- - - - --
M1
Notes
mpressed on bank
Shelving
in character of soil
rrestrial vegetation
of litter and debris
-
Wracking
'
nm, bent, or absent
V
Sediment sorting
?d or washed away
Scour
Deposition
served flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
in plant community
/
c/
Other:

TR-NWW-17i
NC DWn Rt.r"m idonfifleatien Tf%v-m Vnvminr d 11
Date: _ ti1 ��
ProjectlSite: N{�
Latitude: 100
(7
Evaluator.
County:Longitude:
7-. 3
Total Points: o
Stream Is at least InfernMent o'
Stream Determ.in circle one
Other �.w
if 19or rennialif�,'30* 1
rmitt
Ephemeral lntePerennial
°e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = I (
Absent
0
0
Weak
1
1
Moderate
2
k. 2
Strong
V Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0
1
-
2,
3
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2--
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts ..
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0 5`,
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
0 0.
No
1 1.5
Yes = 3
­­n 01U uu i.aLou, boa ujscu5�ls in manuai
B_ Hvdrolonv IRi ihtntal = \O " �
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3 ' •.,
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1'
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
_il a
0.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
v. �wnWyy �VUULULQ1 - )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
?i
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 :
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
.,,
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
(]
1
2
3
22. Fish
23. Crayfish
0
(?l
0.5
0.5
_1 :
1
1.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
_J
1.5
25. Algae
0
_05
f
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual.
-
Notes:
Sketch:

TR-NWW-18i
NC DWQ Stream Identification. Form Version 4.11 „ 5�
Date: _ ProjectlSite: {� 6�1 Latitude: -SS. ! oaq--7
Evaluator `���(, County: (tea ri1 Longitude:_77. 6 _6
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one) Other /!6W
M
Stream is at leastlnternottent e'" ; Ephemeral _Intermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if a 30"
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = "', j
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18- Continuity of channel bed and bank
0 .'
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1' :
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1'
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0""
1
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
Q
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
07'
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0)
Yes = 3
. GILLILYLRI 41LVIL4.l FLV ILLA IGLV , VV .a a ��� ��L4��4La� -
R Hvtirnlnnv lSuhtntal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
`_0
1 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of.high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
f: Rininnv fi4uhtntal = 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
L-3 1
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)"
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks - _ _ .
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
.0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
;0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
10'
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
U
0.5 -
1
1.5 ,
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
m

TR-NWW-18i
Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions
._ Q, Site: Ib
Width:
Height: -�1 40 c
Depth water: ew;r Rio Notes
_ _ S�
Natural II
Chan
Destruction i
Prose
Vegetation mattei
Leaf litter dis
Multipl
Cha
no impressed on bank
Shelving
jes in character of soil
if terrestrial vegetation
nce of litter and debris
Wracking
I down, bent, or absent
Sediment sorting
✓
curbed or washed away
-'
Scour
Deposition
✓
e observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
nge in plant community
Other:
a
44 IW,

NC DWn 19tream identifieatGon Form Version 4.11
TR-NWW-20i
Date: ' r , �'�,��
ProjectlSite: /�/ Fyn
LqtLtude: ��° lot ti
Evaluator.
County:
Longitude:-7-7° 0-71 g�ro
Total i otlnits:
Stream is at least intermittent
?"
Stream Detg rminabon (circle one.)
Perennial
Other /�/�r�,
if a 19 of perennial if 2 30*
Ephemeralntermittent
,
e.g. Quadllfame:�
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
V- Continuity of channel bed and bank
02
1
z
3
_
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool se uence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3 -
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
y
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
8
9. Grade control
0
0.5_
1
11.5
10. Natural valley
0
40.5 -
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual _
R Hvdminnv iSuhtntal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
L1 `�
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5!
1
1 5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
, 15
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes, 3
r. RinlAnw (Jgiihtntal = . . 1
18. Fibrous roots in -streambed
�3
2
1
0
_
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
,J
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
22. Fisli: -
0
0.5--)
23. Crayfish:_
QLJ
0.5
1
1.5'
24. Amphibians
0-"
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
-:0::;
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other =
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
_
Notes:
Sketch:
'�kt

• �• • ,:,ems'
Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions 5
r
Site:
Width: ? ---- --
4
Height: ` - �0 ate;. TR-N�VW-20i
Depth water: r1 - �Lo �o �� Notes
Natural
Chan
Destruction
Press
Vegetation matte
Leaf litter dis
Multipl
Cha
ine impressed on bank
Shelving
ges in character of soil
A terrestrial vegetation
!nce of litter and debris
Wracking
I down, bent, or absent
Sediment sorting
Arbed or washed away
Scour
Deposition
e observed flog events
Bed and banks
"
Water staining
ige in plant community
Other:
12

f A
TR-NWW-20i +
l4C DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: �Q 2 O l ProjectfUte. Latitude:, oscAlp
Evaluator., County: Longitude: _77,0_27,M,
Total'Points: Stream Determ ination (circle one) other ; NY,,��V
Stream is at least intermittent - Ephemeral Intermitter -Perennial e.g. QuadNainE
if z 19 or Perennial if Z 30
A. Geornor holo (Subtotal =®-)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1B- Continuity of channel bed and bank
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalineg
a j
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex.'r'lffie-pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence
0
�'
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0 ,
1
21_
3
.6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits'`
0
-
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0)
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley!
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
anmciai oicnes are na rates; we a sussi�x N Inmanual
Q 4huirn e%riv fCi ihtntal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
-
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
,Yes = 3
r' MAInrnv fRi 1htntal = 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 .
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
D,'
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
­1:_5.
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
r' 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75, OBL = 1.5 ,Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

TR-NWW-20i�
Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination r- t2�l-(2(
Dimensions
Width: Site:
_
Height: 2 - LA �� aQ` 'k-
Depth water: - �o
p �� Notes
_-_
Natural I
Chan
Destruction
Press
Vegetation matte,
Leaf litter dis
Multip
Chi
ine impressed on bank
Shelving
V
ges in character of soil-'
Df terrestrial vegetation
nce of litter and debris
-
Wracking
i down, bent, or absent
Sediment sorting
turbed or washed away
Scour
Deposition
le observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
nge in plant community
v'
Other:
A

USACE AID#
DWQ
Site #
TR-NWW-20i
y gT,�,v/
(indicate on attached map) V
,q STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
!!!71 A4P
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Alr-V i?2-*rn I P-r a " Rw-t/' 2. Evaluator's name: 6 1 xl y pk,
3. Date of evaluation: (�2'� 4. Time of evaluation: � r /gin...
5. Name of stream: V T 6. River basin:_ . r V 1-4-
7. Approximate drainage area: �• '�``' �• r 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: 10. County:,
efa.&e,n
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): .. a
Latitude (ex.34.872312): 1��`7 Longitude (ex. —77.556611): 7� r�
Method location determined (circle): +' -P Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evalua on (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: WY � "I',
16. Site conditions at time of visit: I OL
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential '�7'0 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Forested
22. Bankfull width: '�` b
24. Channel slope down center of stream: 4V"flat (0 to 2%)
25. Channel sinuosity:' - UAS'traight Occasional bends
_% Cleared / Logged _% Other i
1
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
✓Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
_Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completlon of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): _ y Comments:
Evaluator's Signature _ Date ___,...... __, _._a. ...... ____
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

TR-NWW-20i
STREAM QUALITV ASSESSMENT WORKS"EET
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION
POINT
RANGE
SCORE,
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
(no flow or saturation - 0; strong flow - max points)
.....
..
2 Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0- 5
0-5
C
(extensive alteration -- 0; no aftcrafion - max
0-6
0-4
0-
3
_points)
Riparian zone
no ,,bulfer � 0;'contiguous, wide buffer - max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
o
0-4
0-4
1
(extensive discharges - 0; no discharges nia% points)
4
5
G roundwaler discharge
0- 1
0-4
0-4
(no discharge - 0, springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. max points).
1
4
6
Presence of adjacent hoodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
Al
(no floodplain = 0: extensive floodplain = max points)
0-2
Entrenchment / noodplain access
0-5
0-4
(deeply entrenched = 0-, frequent flooding - max points)
0-4
0-2
Presence of adjacent wetlands
'--2,
(no wetlands -- 0; large adjacent sycliands max points}
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
D
(extensive channelizaliun 0; natural meander max points)
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive deposition 0; little or no sediment max points)
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
0-4
0-5
NA*
(fine, homogenous 0; large, diverse sizes - max points)
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
U-5
0.4
ideepiv incised -, 0, stable bed & banks _ max points)
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
5
14
(severe erosion : 0: no erosion, stable banks - nuix points)
--
14
0-3
0-4
0 - i
—*�n-t depth and density on hanks
R
(no visible roots � 0. dense rtv-ts throughout , max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
Q-5
0-4
0-5
(substantial impact =G; no evidence , roux points)
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
4-2.
(no fifflesh-ipples or pools = 0. well -developed - max points)
17
Habitat complexity
(little or no habitat =- 0; frequent, varied habitats - max points)
0-6
1�1
0-6
0-6
M
18
Canopy coverage vvcr streambed
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy -- max points)
NA*
0-4
I
Substrate embeddedness
0 - 4
(deepl) embedded = 0; loose stnicture _ max)
0-5
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see . page 4)
0-4
0-
(no evidence 0; coninion, numerous types - Max Points)
0
21
Presence of amphibians
D-4
0-4
0-4
0
(110 evidence 0. connuon, numerous types Max POInts)
*4
0
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0.4
0-4
(no evidence 0; coniniun, numerous t% pes - max points)
23
0-5
31
Evidence of wildlife use
0
0- 5
(110 evidence _ 0; abundant evidence = ma-N pciints)
100
Total Poinis Possible
100
1 ())
TOTAL SWORE. (also enier on first
page)
* 'I hese characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

TR-NWW-22i
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 S S t D ?-
Date: 7 I Z�
ProjectlSite: �,�
Latitude: �faq I �83
Evaluator. �y�, ;
County:
Longitude: - ;7;
Total Points: �/ �
Stream is at least intermittent �iV
Stream Deter�i yet (circle one)
Ephemeral,.thtermitteot Perennial
Other 1✓P%'✓,/i/G�
e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if z 30*
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = a
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18. Continuity of channel bed and bank ! ;
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalmeg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
17)
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
V
2
3
5, Activelrelict floodplain
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
(Di
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natuial valley
0
0.51;
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (,Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
L 6.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
'0)
5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes rt
C. Biology (Subtotal = & 5-)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
'0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
' .`
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
§
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other - 0
*perennial streams may al a identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: MPrG „ 4 1
Sketch:
f Y7R r Y /

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
TR-NWW-22i
Dimensions QO site: T SSG -UL
Width: ffi 5-
Height: Sate- y
Depth water: pry o �.o ��m
�, Notes
Natural line impressed on bank
Changes in character of soil
Destruction of terrestrial vegetation
Presence of litter and debris
Vegetation matted down, bent, or
Sediment sorting
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away
Multiple observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
Change in plant community

USACE AID# _ DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
T.�) J? Ko�4 5,W. -0
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: ' lo �Y,_2. Evaluator's name: TR-NWW-22i
3. Date of evaluation: 710 41 a (. r
5. Name of stream: (JI JD Utitt nVU S50
7. Approximate drainage area: A'
9. Length of reach evaluated:
4. Time of evaluation:
6. River basin: Nj.U5C
S. Stream order:
10. County:
l CAVCVA
11. Site coordinates (if known)prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
i Latitude (ex. 34.872312): -1K 01WO Longitude (ex.-77.556611):-------- � p
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet 'Ortho (Aerial) Photo/G • Other GIS Other _.
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landniai kw and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
.._-1"'y)Ic)ur, 1
--„_
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: ht\ f M 011 —
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: —....-_.._
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: L*/o Residential _% Commercial % Industrial __,% Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared /Logged _% Other ( _ 1
22. Bankfull width:, i 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): F) t
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ✓Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: V Straight _Occasional bends Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments: -
Evaluator's Signaturef tALI A'UA..�r- f_ Date__... " .- '-
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USAGE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET TR-NWW-22i
# CHARACTERISTICS
FCOREGION POINT
RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
i no flow or saturation = 0 • strow, flow = maxu,r6 nts)
0-6
0-5
0-5
O
2
Evidence of past human alteration
_
,extensive alteration = 0: no alteration - max ptamts
0-6
0-4
0-5
3
Riparian zone
i.no buffer = 0; conti �uous, wide buffer = max %,, pints i
1
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
extensive discharres�=_ 0; no discharges = max hints)
5
0-3
0-4
0-4
Groundwater discharge
fno discharge = 0: springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
D
> +
(no floodplain 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplain access
a7
0-5
0-4
0-2
0(dee
-1 entrenched = 0: frequent flooding = max points)
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max po*tnts)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
(.extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
Z
+ extensive deposition- 0; little or no sediment = mxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
s fine.oma�enous = 0; large diverse size = s max hints)
0-5
0-4
0-5
12
m _ _
Evidence of channel incision or widening
(decpl�, incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
13
0-5
0-5
0-5
Presence of major bank failures
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion. stable banks = max p Dints
Root depth and density on banks
14
0-3
0-4
0-5
3,
Ono visible roots = 0: dense roots throu�h ;out =max .Dints
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
J
+ substantial impact �: no evidence = max points)
Presence of riffle-pool/tipple-pool complexes
16
0-3
0-5
0-6
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0: well -developed = maxpoints)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
�
Tittle or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
5
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max_g�omts)_
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0. common, numerous types - maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O
(no evidence = 0; common numerous types = max points)
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
1
mO
(no evidence_ = 0 c:ornnian, numcrnus types =�m pomts)�
23
_
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
2.
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max dints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
too
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

TR-NWW-23i
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 �5S W
Date: % / 1 ZQ
ProjectfSite: Tim ?-1,4(,y
Latitude:
Evaluator. SY1rl li, RX1i)m
County: cxtycn
Longitude: - 7 7, 0872/ 7
Total Points:
Stream Dete circle one)
Other t3�Y�l NC
Pew
Stream is at least intermittent
if 2 19 or perennial ift� 30'
EphemeralQ2!!EaTMq Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalvm
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri : le- )ool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1'
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1;
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
b
1
2
3
B. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0.5
I.t
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
4
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1+
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
j ^
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
19
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = ` I ) V
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
ff.;
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
(1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.
b.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; LOBL =,1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: A jA tf CAtlCS
Sketch:
Go��171���a� ravc,

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions(��
Width: ,a
Height: � f fi �� a�
eb
Depth water: C),6 � i ho �� ��
Natural line imps
Changes in cl
Destruction of terres-
Presence of li
Vegetation matted down,
Se
Leaf litter disturbed o
Multiple obsen
Change in pl
TR-NWW-23i
Site: Tyre C tqy 555-0'
Notes
essed on bank P
Shelving
iaracter of soil
d11 rCh
�(
✓
rial vegetation
tter and debris
Wracking
V/
)ent, or absent
dim ent sorting
V
r washed away ✓
Scour
✓
Deposition
✓
ed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
ant community V/
Other:

USACE AID# _ _ DWQ #_ _ Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: i'.`__.^._13"__',' ,. 2.Evaluator's name: _ Sh'1l aVa5Cthr, TR-NWW-23i
3. Date of evaluation: 2�
5. Name of stream: Y i' t�lV(,tr
7. Approximate drainage area:
9. Length of reach evaluated:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
3 9t15-77
4. Time of evaluation:
6. River basin:
S. Stream order —
10. County:_ ON __.
�^ 12. Subdivision name (if any): .._
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 71 Longitude (ex.-77.556611): - ' ��
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
'1CCr VOC C Av
14. Proposed channel work (if any):_
15. Recent weather conditions: WMA I
16. Site conditions at time of visit:- 100f Mal
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters _Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential
_% Forested
22. Bankfull width: i � P.
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%)
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
_% Commercial % Industrial "/o Agricultural
_% Cleared / Logged % Other
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): Ij P r
_Gentle (2 to 4%) ____Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ✓ Straight _Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 1 2- Comments:
Evaluator's Signature 61V44 •tA &jd�
_----____ Date----'1 I T b
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET TR-NWW-23i
ECOREGION POINT
GE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
i
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
(extensive alteration = 0: no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
(no buffer = 0; continuous, wide buffer = max points)
" 1
_!
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
5
Groundwater discharge
-
03
0-4
0-4
1
U
(no discharge = 0• springs, seeps, wetlands. etc. = max mints)
$ 6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 - 4
0 - 2
�-
i no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
j 7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0_ 5
0- 4
0- 2
-
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
II
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
O
(no wetlands = 0• large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
V
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
16
( extensive deposition-- osition-- 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
(fine, homogenous = 0: large, diverse sizes = max ointsy
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
Weepl4incised = 0; stable bed &banks =max points)
a
13
Presence of major bank failures
_ t severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
14
0-3
0-4
0-5
2.
Root depth and density on banks
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max p � -ints)
15
� 0-5
0-4
0-5
3
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
( substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points a
0-3
0-5
0-6
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
2
F
(no riffles/ripples or pools =0_well-developed = max pints)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, vaned habitats =max 1), imts a
0-5
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
(no shadim=t veretation = 0: continuous canopy = max Lt'ints )
�
NA*
0-4
0-4
-
19
Substrate embeddedness
t dee:+- embedded = 0; loose structure = mart
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
20
0-4
0-5
0-5
(no evidence =0 con 'i"riots. t7unicrokit, lypes - max points)
Presence of amphibians
21
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
0
(no evidence = 0: coinni,tt. numerous r, ples�max i0 rots)
Presence of fish
O 22
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous is prs = max Points)
0-6
0-5
Evidence of wildlife use
23
0-5
Z
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxSmts
l0 �
!
Total Points Possible
!
TOTAL SCORE (al-o enter on first page)
�
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

TR-W2
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf/Coastal Plain Region
Pro)ectlSite: TA~*Q`v `" Clly/County; /�'� f f'rr�[aa''�t/'t Sampling Date:--'
ApplicantlOwner: ���. > State; IV C. Sampling Point: w L -112jr
t �1 �
Investigator(s): _ ,k' ter, L u, i �T r o W-\ Section, Township, Range: [ uu h ti '
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): igT Local relief (concave, convex, Hone): Slope (%): 7 Z �4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): _ - 153 A Let: 3r I f01 `t a Long: n � . U-4-1 ' 7 04 Datum: k/&S - b y
Soil Map Unit Name ry A d `_ _~ �' - _ '' a NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes '--'No
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ­71,rw Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes . / No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks: j/ t -T
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Prin3ary Indicators Imininium cf one
is required: GlaeGk all Ihat apply) _
Surface Water (Al)
_ Aquatic Fauna (BI3)
� r'gh Water Table W)
_ Mad Deposits (BI6) (LRR U)
s=/S6furation (A3)
aler Marks (BI)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils (C6)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134) Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
— Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_✓Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes � Pro Depth (inches): 9
Saturation Present? Yes f No Depth (inches): 0
includes capillary finger _
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspe
Remarks: t
450,
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (BB)
Sgarsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ 4rainaga Patterns (BIO)
_ Moss Trim Lines (BIB)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows. (CS)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Sballow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ZNo
I I, k^6 //4;j
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

TR-W2
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) _% Cover Status
1. _l-' - u S - f14- L
2. _-:5"-w 1 r • t., .._ ___ _ __ ._._._..............
3. I)im.�
4. `r
Sampling Point:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
-`
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: E .
6.
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = (�f
_
50% of total cover: 2 b
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Saolina/Shrub
Stratum (Plot size: �- �` )
_
FAC species S x 3 = 2�
'
FACU species r% x 4 =
2.
�' k: 1 � e-
UPL species x 5 = a
(A)
(B)
(A1B)
3. � , r. i ,.. n� � rit. 3�.
_ G Column Totals: I'D (A) -J-lU (B)
4. `` M Prevalence Index = B/A
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:1-5- 20% of total cover: to
Herb Stratum (Plot gize: 3 aA IF ) {{
1. �u� nu(u rr - 41:.:. 0 :F&,J
2. _ _ I Oct) �. ✓!
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling[Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
U. U Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9. a of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
10.
11.
12.
_ = Total Cover
500A of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 0 -a e,2.
)
3.
4.
4.
5.
D = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
HemarKS: (it oDservea,
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.2B it in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes V No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

TR-W2
SOIL
Sampling Pdnt: Q lua— /o'S�
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(Inches i Color (mdst),__ % Color noist) % TYpe Loc' !.r Texture Remarks
10 Ve2/ t ' � >�b4�n
k�f�
tD tee
'Type: C=Concentration, D=DeF letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al) _
Pdyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2) _
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_
Black Histic (A3) _
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _
Reduced Vertic (F16) (outside M LRA 150A,B)
_
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) _
Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (AB) [LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Depleted Ochric (Fi i) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15DB)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes-Z.—No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

TR-W2
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Pro)ect/Site: A," ,�z�(�a f j r—p✓o-'t� .+�~f� Clty/County: �KA nti Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner. h/2wJ r' rti _ State: AA-' Sampling Point, L /
r-•
Investigator(s): Z Ar?'61j Lam` /) �y to w�_ Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, ferrate, e�tc—): 1or. Local relief (concave, convex, none): / Xry. _ __. Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 1i Let: �d� _�. Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: -C-, uw w _� '"xc. NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ✓ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes LI No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Yes G'No_
Yes No
Yes No
rxAkAA, � p eel
Is the Sampled Area /
within a Wetland? Yes No /
Gam! � VL/ Pam • -",A
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired:
check d Li_a! aooly!
_ Surface Water (A1)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C7)
_ Water Marks (61)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along ivy ing Roots (C3)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Presence of Reducecf 4on (C4)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
_ RecenlIrwpiiduciion in Tiled Soils (C6)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Thiry ,Wuck Surface (C7)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
(Explain in Remarks)
_ Inundation on Aerial Imagery
Visible
�tner
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_ Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Pre Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
IV, hj�,,(�7 S',(S bcc --e— &F � C-it`' (y i �r.>7.t.�S '4,01,/, .1
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

TR-W2
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? 7 hl^ Number of Dominant Species
1. h ti 'l oud, w- 3 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2, Total Number of Dominant
3• v` 'A ��- �; I Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
Z5 20% of total cover:
10
SaolinaQhrub Stratum (Plot size: a " r
)
1. 1-1,e . ( , • .tom
( P,
rye
r/LCi'
2.
Z
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
0% of total cover:
20% or total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
rm (Plot
Woody Vine Stratum t size: -7
2.
3.
4.
5.
W = Total Cover
50% of total cover: S 20% of total cover: Z
Remarx5: (n ODservea, ust
Sampling Point: 4''-14
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: l o J (A/3)
Prevalence maex worttsneet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply tr :
OBL species 0
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 = Z
FACU species
x 4 = D
UPL species
x 5 = !)
Column Totals:
(A) Z (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
YvrlrnnMAln Vnnnfe4lnn IndlneMro.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Dominance Test is >50°%
✓3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (f m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

TR-W2
Sampling Pant: t/Y'3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(Inchesi Color (moist) % Color (moist) % T+roe Loc Texture Remarks
b— I'r ; `V t Q2 r 1493 5, - /&,A w%
—2� t o j, i> C- s l
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solle:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Pclyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR 3, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplaln Solis (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (84) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (36) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, 3, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No -
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

TR-W3
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: City/County: NBW ; J ' Sampling Date:
r�
Applica► ttOwner. N °. 1-"': r State: NG Sampling Point:
' �Or.�,v�jJ• —
Investigator(s): m-, l` ''' ► ' Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): rY - Slope
3r19I - 0708 w
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: 9 Z Long: � /• / g ,Datum: GSBY
Soil Map Unit Name: - oumloae fi-,r rA,, 2 &Pf f-f NWI classification: PF6
_
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes t/ No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
1
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
wetland Mydroiogy indicators:
Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Yes VZ
V` No within a Wetland?
Yes No
Surface Water (Al)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Q Iron Deposits (B5)
a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
® Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes N
Water Table Present? Yes N
1 Saturation Present? Yes N
includes caaillary frinne)
Remarks:
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
YIE
II Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
II Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
0 Shallow Aquitard (D3) .
0 FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
II Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
o Depth (inches): �T
o Depth (inches):
o Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

TR-W3
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
I.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sampling Point:+ XF- 06
vd-
% Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
%D That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: A
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: VP)
2
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
_ = Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plotsize: '4771;
�� )
%
l
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cor.�% 20% of total cover.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 0-�' h4 )
2.
3.
4.
5.
V = Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20°� of total cover. k�
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/6)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1�Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 -Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shnib - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation y
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Guff Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

TR-W3
SOIL
Sampling Point: `;,W-D-5-
kJ -
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) _ % Color mmoist) % Tvne Loc` Textur, Remai
p - � + ON R 3 100 ? ?o d
i
'Tvp;c : C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
0
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR S)
0
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C,153D)
D Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:. --
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes / No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Guff Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

TR-W3
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and
� Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: _ City/County y��t'✓ /W/ ZYA( YZA Sampling Date: 7 2!/' w
Applicant/Owner. _ _. _ _ _ .. - _ _ .— _ _ - TState: �G Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): _ Section, Township, Range:._ /Ot✓�Sh'11�
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): _ _ _ Local relief (concave, convex, none):. . F -e.-. Slope (%): LZ
Subregion (LRR orMLRA): - _ _._ -1_- _ Lat: 3f i1 ' -�� Long: `7� ��O _..__ Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: ! eggiidZL,,L5 1-r f✓/__- % .. -2 -56e65 NWI classification:
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _VII/ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary In- minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all the! .ila_W s_
jJ__$4-t ce Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
t❑i Aquatic Fauna (B13) lJ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
1L�..If Marl Deposits (B75) (LRR U)
13
� Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C 1.
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
t-t Oxidized Rhizosphe�along Living Roots (C3)
Qs�
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
PreawoT Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
LJ Drift Deposits (63)
0 -Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
a Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
,❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0 Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑. Inur d,iiion ;ri.;ir le on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (135)
0 Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
i includes Capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

TR-W3
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
,� Absolute Dominant Indicator _
Tree Stratum (Plot size: '� -. ) % Cover 'es? Status
1.
KA rQ�
2. � '
�� I'VE,
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Cover
[lr,=Total
50% of total cover. ! 0 20% of total cover'
Sa lin /Sh b
tr m (Plot size: '_ )
2.
3.
4.
5.
r'
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover.
Herl, Stratum (Plot size: Y� )
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11. ,�
12.
Total Cover
50% of total corv�er. _� 20% of total cover.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1. (r t,, �� "P 10.
2. v
'•rJ,
3.
i
4.
5.
_ = Total Cover
50% of total cover. y 20% of total cover.
Remarks: (If observed, list
Sampling Point:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of-
Multi by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species _
x 2 =
FAC species __. ---. --
x 3 =
FACU species -
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
liydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_/' - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_V 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalenoe Index is S3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Venetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic /
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

TR-W3
SOIL
Sampling Point: s>4
(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
;inches_ Color (moisj) %
S 100
100
Redox Features
Color moi t % Type Loc'
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Texture Remarks
r
Location: PL=Pone Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T. U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
n
Redox Depressions (F8) 7u--� Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) ID Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) -
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (84)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150S)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Slopped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C,1530)
4 4WI.
rface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)Layor (if observed):
nches):
asks
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 111)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

TR-W4, W5, W6, W7, W8
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: .__ City/County: U M Sampling Date:
'. ' i'"�'�
_m
Applicant/Owner. O N • r' /" State: NG Sampling Point:...._
Investigator(s): 5MI rpm Section, Township, Range:
—....
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): fl0Mk Local relief (concave, convex, none):Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): , 4'. Lat: 35, ' Wtb : Long: '�% 7,41Wk S 3 Datum:"9.1
Soil Map Unit Name: Awl-/')N4- ` Y" NWI classification: ��� g Lf1
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes J No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
---���--- Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Within a Wetland? Yes V No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes VV No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is rE
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required),
0 Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (All)
High Water Table (A2)
T❑1 Aquatic Fauna (613)
�uT Mari Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
USparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Drainage Patterns (810)
Saturation (A3)
TL—Jr Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (62)
LJOxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
LI Presence Reduced Iron
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
RDriftDeposits (133)
of (C4)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
II Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
&Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (65)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
II Shallow Aquitard (D3)
0 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (135)
a Water -Stained Leaves (69)
0 Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
_ includes cap@g0LPfinge)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

TR-W4, W5, W6, W7, W8
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 5WZ- &INet
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3L'! {' Y, d. % Cover 5 ecies? Status
Dominance Testworkshest:
T
Number of Dominant Species
I. pl tf Yt.dY.yuIPP" (90 Flit,.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. (,,1 C. 0 EAC-
---
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species ' �y n
5•
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total co r _ 20% of total cover. )JE _
FACW species - x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: !• 4 1A )
FAC species x 3 =
1. M %� (;Pc
FACU species x 4=
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
2. (. .I %-rndYYt St, �:t FqC .=
3.
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5•
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
?• .
✓2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover. V 20% of total cover. 26
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3•
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
5.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
7.
8.
g,
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total co r. 20% of total cover.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1..TI—NAY YOB1.',,��t,d►j.. '�� FA
2. 70 U ' QV4"L- d JA T-
3.
4.
5•
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover. . z) ,s 20 % of total cover.
Present? Yes Y No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Amry Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.P

TR-W4, W5, W6, W7, W8
�-1a�
Sampling Point: tL I elt
to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) 0/6Color (moNy
ist) Loci
Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration, D-De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS -Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL-Pore Linin ,_M - - - - =Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
0
Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
13 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3) U Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
D
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Mari (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
0
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
0 Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
n Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
D Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
I Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 1V No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Guff Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

TR-W4, W5, W6, W7, W8
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Arotlicant/Owner. ''�,/ ..�' City/County: � r __ pingTAR °ZSt Z
.._ _ lleo ,t 7A 114AXM Sam lin Date:
pp ®_ '' State. dr' Sampling Point. -'
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landfonn (hilislope, terrace, etc.): �"` '' '! Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): L ti
Subregion (LRR orMLRA) " Lat: 35a .._ Long: `% bTQ Sz '3 ```� Datum:
P _....... K h M"�.— _ -- - — NWI classification: <►'+
Soil Ma Unit Name:.,
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical f:,r this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks: a
�� yftlnf r�
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Yes No � Within a Wetland?
Yes No
P-11� IP S
❑
Surface Water (Al)
High Water Table (A2)
T❑T Aquatic Fauna (1313)
u Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
p❑�
LJ
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Water Marks (131)
1❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
I_❑7
Sediment Deposits (132)
TL�I
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_
Drift Deposits (B3)
tL�JT
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Q
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
}❑
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
❑, Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Yes No ✓
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
rySeason Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
0 Shallow Aquitard (133)
1] FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
II Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
i
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): /
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): I Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 1/ No
(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

TR-W4, W5, W6, W7, W8
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: S W1, `°" ",
n
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size �S ` ,)
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. (1 l rG .
(PC M, C
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. FrotxinuA nr_q^,,rS "JY
LID
Total Number of Dominant
r
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AIB)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of Multiply by:
7
8
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total coy r. `' ii 20% of total cover._
FACW species x 2 =
SaplinalShrub Stratum (Plot size: --tea 1,
FAC species x 3 =
��
1. LtfA��'Y4.A1(Yi 51YIe�f`Ss s
� Ji � '��tG
FACU species ._.__....__ -_.. x 4 =
UPL species --_._- ._ _•. x 5 -
2
3.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
- - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7•
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
--
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover�a
_
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover
r„_
20% of total cover.
_
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
,�-
'Indicators of h dric soil and wetland hydrology must
Y Y 9Y
1.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree- Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
3'
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5.
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7,
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
g,
10. /
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
o'
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
- -
50 r. otal ve)
20% of total cover.
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size:
(
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover.
I} T! 20% of total cover.
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

TR-W4, W5, W6, W7, W8
SOIL
Profile
to the depth needed to document the Indicator or
Depth Malrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moistl % Color (moist) % Type' Loc
'L it) '( F - 100
'T�e: C=Concentraboi
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Sampling Point: V
Texture Remarks
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS --Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
(Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
U
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
HHistic
Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F7) (LRR 0) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S. T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
❑
H5
cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
-E]
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Mad (F10) (LRR U) D Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
0
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
D Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
HCoast
Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) JLJ
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 1530)
0 Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
No _
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

5* } Sy✓�- TR-W09
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site:IfUl &M Y City/County: _NtAA_ fNj (A0Ntn Sampling Date: 7 11 ,_ V
Applicant/Owner: ------ State:,_ Sampling Point: SW(S - 0 Z WCt
Investigator(s):. _ . A',',t 'i Section, t!91p, Range: 70y4t K !-i-, P
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): �IotyAplo, i1 Local s relief (concave, convex, none): ,OYV /iW �. Slope (%),It
L2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): L A Lett: is.�M� _ 1 \ Long: -' 7- bs 7 Datum: r C
Soil Map Unit Name: i)AS/nA Y* r'" 7' �tY S�n� 14s, t t)yuWie SDtn jgrg l NWI classification: e fD a aF .
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for�this time of year? Yes V _ Nod (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _/ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Welland Hydrology Present?
Remarks: t` a[ f
Yes
Yes
Yes
✓ No
✓ No
✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes /� No
Iwrr&A) ^4t e,;; 760 d75,
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required}
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply(
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) —
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (135) i
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓/ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
`� Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes V No
includes capillary fringe}
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:����
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
TR-W09
Sampling Point: sw (T -az Witt
Tree Stratum �� ��° rov)
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover. Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
(Plot size:
Y FAW
Number of Dominant Species
�
1. i jim s rnuElInK
MY.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
2. f, rI.' (%A
3. M\tjSY1r%il£ IbYa
_ 4Q•I. Y_EAL-
2-01 _ 066
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
4. •
Percent of Dominant Species
�/�
5• - ...
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8
Total % Cover of:Multiply by:
010 = Total Cover
OBL species x t =
50% of total cie :
� 20% of total cover: l
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub
Stratum (Plot size: )7- 2t )
FAC species x 3 =
I.
ray
.,- y ..
FACU species x 4 =
2. l
sin
6IA 'y r� rr
UPL species x 5 =
3
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A=
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6•
.-.-
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
?•
V 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ = Total Cover
_
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of otal cover:
1. 20% of total cover:
_
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1,
°a� y •'":,
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. 6 0e
hM Lr : r, ",n It " rA,
V)Y, Y C^'
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
S.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines greeter than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
(010 = Total Cover
50%of total c er: � 20% of total cover.
Woo Vine Stratum {Plot size: 0 }
I FAC
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 1.0) 20% of total cover: 1. Present? Yes Y No
Remarks: (If
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
' 11E
Sampling Point: SW (S 0 N c-+
to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moisti % Color (moist) % Type Loc- Texture
100
'�-►fit ('� ,' �1 �.q0 10X(t?1L+ to G joam
e:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless othervAse noted.)
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Linin.A=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Fpipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
1/ Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(M LRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (M LRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A,150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes V No
US Army Carps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

TR-W09
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: �tr ' � ' "+' City/County: 199 i Sampling Date: 111.'10-0
Applicant/Owner " nor `-`
_ _ _ _. ... State: , t,. Sampling Point:
Investigator(s)._ _ _ _...._.— _ _ Section, Township, Range: T-'7 tr ' I
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): LL _ _ _.._.. _._ Local relief (concave, convex, none): Ckjat'04 Slope (9/6): '1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: 3), L9 Long: -7-7, d S 1371 Datum: h) r
Soil Map Unit Name:. Al— 7"� _ ____. -- Ck, Y) M �' �:'. `-f yl_,, , �° MM classification: �..
Are climatic !hydrologic conditions on the site :;apical for this ti re of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V_ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes �_ No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No �!
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: _ Secondary Indicators (minimum,of tw67 equired) i
Surface Water (Al)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (Bi)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_
Drift Deposits (B3)
a
Algal Mat or Crust (B4}
a
Iron Deposits (85)
a
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
[�
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
N
Water Table Present? Yes
N
Saturation Present? Yes
N
r. includes caoillary frinae)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, mon
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Mari Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C4)-
Oxidized Rhl2 n eres along Living Roots (C3)
PT mence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Titled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
o V Depth (inches):
o ✓ Depth (inches):
o V Depth (inches):
" Surface6oibCracks (136)
SP-ar�sely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
II Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
II Geomorphic Position (D2)
0 Shallow Aquitard (133)
0 FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No V
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Guff Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

K YC,a r-�,S
TR-W09
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
_
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover.
20% of total cover.
SaplinolShrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4. /
5. �,..
6. _
7.
8. .._
= Total Cover
5 % of total cover.
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 19)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Sampling Point: S W (s - O 2 V-P
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant /
Species Across All Strata: / (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ��� (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals: ... ........._..
(A)
Prevalence Index = B/A = _
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
(B)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
- - Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11. height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. i
2.
3.
4.
i
5• .Hydrophytic
s" y = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover. Present?
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Yes 1/ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Guff Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

TR-W09
SOIL
Sampling Point: S W y - p K
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox F( at.jr=s
(inches) Color (moist)
% Color jmoist'
% Tvne,Loc2
Texture Remarks
Q" ItM11 417-
_kD IQ 3Y 6,14
40 C M
50V �?
'TY;,e: C=Concentration, D=De lefion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS --Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (All)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (it
Type:
Depth (inches): _
Remarks:
2 Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A,15013)
Piedmont Floodpiain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C,153D)
Thin Dark Surface
(S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
T�Tri
u
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dario Surface (F6)
❑Red
(MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions
Parent Material (TF2)
(F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Mari (F10) (LRR U)
�
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F73) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dena Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No-
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

TR-W10
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: A cCL '',` �a°' i�� City/County: 1�/ {✓ Sampling Date:
ApplicantlOwner: C T. o/ /OG..f b6e-j State: _ Sampling Point: W h
Investigator(s): 7ri0,eo, � � t{�/f, Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):���a�"�rLocal relief (concave, convex, none): : a -- Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): _ _ - Let: 3 ` r 9 ! 7 d � �! Long: — 77+ ODatum: Wl �
Sal Map Unit Name: A PA/,Jae ; 'wr «,.' :. ' 1,0 :; NWI classification: L��7
Are climatic ! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes "" No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation �, Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes / No
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No'
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
we
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aooly)
_ Surface Water (Al) _ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_High Water Table (A2) _ Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Water Marks (131) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Sediment Deposits (132) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Drift Deposits (63) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Sails (C6)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Iron Deposits (135) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Secondary Indicators i.minimum
Surface Soil Cracks (Be)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139) ! Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): I_
Saturation Present? Yes "7'No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present?
includes capiII& y fringe
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Yes / No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
TR-W10
Sampling Point: %iw6zi` Z,
Absolute uomnant naicator uommance lest uwrxsneet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2' Total Number or Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata:
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
j 50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: "�) "'" �
0"ff" V
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover: 9y
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
500% of total cover:
lso =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 2-0
= Total Cover
_ 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (it observed, list morphological adaptations peiow).
0 (A/3)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species _._
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 = _
Column Totals:
(A) _ (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50°%
_ 3 -Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

TR-W10
SOIL
Prome Description: (Describe to the
Sampling Point: (%WPU42jv
ator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
finches; Color imolst) % _ __Color (moist) % Twe Loc Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ?Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric 34
Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside M LRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _
7--"'Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (Fi 1) (M LRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (85)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (86)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (37) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

TR-W10
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: J
R;` / ` / �
City/County: I/6,W
y1W✓�`� Sampling Date: , /dC - 214
Applicant/Owner: , s�
.. �r - ��
State: NG Sampling Point: /�1.✓/� .•'r ✓yr'
Investigator(s): e �
• tfr
Section, Township, Range:
_�
�oc.r" ' �:" r f�.^
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc,): S(�, ' _
Local relief (concave, convex, none): '� ' 014- _ Slope (%): / - 2
Subregion LRR or MLRA :
� J
Let: L� � Long:
�� . �
' 7� 0� ' �3—. Datum: ��S i'%
Soil Map Unit Name:
F C`r .47'd'iZ'�
> ; . �*
^
NWI classification: '"� %114
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Z No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrok>gy Present? Yes
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
No Is the Sampled,
No No:::Z within a Wetlani
Primary Indicators (minimum cf .ont?_is rcc uirud7
check all that aoalv+_
_ Surface Water (A1) _
Any atic Fauna (1313)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Mad Deposits (615) (LRR U)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Wafer Marks (81) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2 _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Drift Deposits (83) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils (C6)
_ Algal Mat or C:::,t (134) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Iron Deposits (135) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Water -Stained Leaves (89)
Secondary Indicators iminimum of tv%_: r, uired,,
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present?
includes ca011a, y fringe
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

TR-W10
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test wnrksheel:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: _ ) % Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
2. �
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
4. f
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A!B)
67. .
Prevalence Index worlcsheet:
% Cover of: Multiply by:
8
-.—Total
OBL species x 1 =
= Total Cover
50% of total e6wer: 20% of total cover:
FACW species _ x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
SaDlina/5hrub Stratum (Plot size: _ )
FACU species x 4 =
1
UPL species x 5 =
2
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3.
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5•
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6•
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7•
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
508A of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: r' ) ff�� d Q 6`w��
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. w
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strala:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
3.
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6•
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
$•
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines greeter than 3.28 it in
11.
height.
12.
4
= Total Cover---
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% or total cover: 200A of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

TR-W10
✓idol✓
Sampling Pant:: w40 2-
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features _
(inches) Color imdstl % _ Color tmolst� % Type LocR Texture Remarks
L�14 A971 rl4z 5,C4�
'Type: C--Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining•, M=Matrix.
Hydric Sall Indicators. (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Pdyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (173)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Layer (it observea):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

S
TR-WI1
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: '►� �/ )A�>' 1 City/County: _ N . ? `. _ Sampling Date:2-
Applicant/Owner: WW3 1:11r' x'" State: �G Sampling Point: Sw - 2 7 vie
Investigator(s):._. _.. '''' 1 -+`s Section, Township, Range:rl�i'�f _
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): a _ 5 Local relief (concave, convex, none): [01 Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): - G`-------- Lat:.. C 09724.7Long: _ —77 n-1�7s� —..—.. Datum: wG,SrY
7 Ju
�
Soil Map Unit Name: - �? _. S��*^� --.. NWI classification: SS ) '
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) /
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No �
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
R,
HYDROLOGY
Hydrology inaicators:
Surface Water (Al)
❑-
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2)
EJ
Mari Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3)
911
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Illttt���III
Sediment Deposits (132)
TL�Jt
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
1L—Jr
LJ
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Qr Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
1_1 Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
[l Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ✓
No Depth (inches):
W v
b
II Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
II Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
II Shallow Aquitard (D3)
0 FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
ater Table Present. Yes No Depth (inches).
Saturation Present? Yes ­7 No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V No
gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if
..Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

TR-W 11
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: /-
-Z
Absolute Dominant Indicator � Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL_ FACW_ or FAC: fAl
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
e
= Total Cover
C 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum ,(Plot size:
g 3< ,
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover 1
50% of to I cover: 20% of total cover. ,b
Herb Stratum ,(Plot size: )
L0 # Me
-7- L
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. t' " 20% of total cover.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover.
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: % (A/B)
Total Yn Cover of: _
_ _ Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species - _
x 5 =
Column Totals: _-._.-_._..
(A) _ _ _ _ _ (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydr phytic Vegetation Indicators:
/" Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
- 3 -Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SaplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

TR-W11
SOIL
Sampling Point: Y),&- 7-7 4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvne' Loc' Texture Remarks
D-g2 100
71-
Type:. C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS --Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
0 Histosol (Al) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR Sj, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) bepleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Mari (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Q Thick Dark Surface (Al2) n Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P. T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S7) (LRR 0, S) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
ltRedox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
npped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
0 D"ark'Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Rea,(rictive Layer (if observed):
(inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes " No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

TR-W11
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
,u/ a' I
Project/Site: Ti P�►'i ) lib City/County: IYI' YY ° — @_ Sampling Date: �� W°
Applicant/Owner. State: _ Sampling Point: J WAZ� 7
Investigator(s):..__ ,. 't. f' '' Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ; '�, r Local relief (concave, convex, none): S]! c Slope (%): -Z 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): % " % ja Let: 3 S• 097 % % Long: % 196 -% -7S 1 Datum: iG1 P
Soil Map Unit Name: L.n - 1,5� ,j�AAv NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) - /
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Y No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology indicators:
Primary Indicalors (minimum of one is {eg__i + dLche,_; all rh_u_t_ .poly)
Surface Water (Al) 1:1 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
1--� High Water Table (A2) 0 Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
LJ Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Water Marks (131) Oxidizers Rhvospheres &long ng Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (132) Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (133) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
L_1 Algal Mat or Crust i ad) Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
j Field Observations: _
SecondaryIndicators (minim T ,,I rave re?ez iredl
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Drainage Pzi+te° is: ;i;, i,
Moss Trim Lines (816)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
II Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (133)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water Present? Yes No G Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No - Depth (inches): _
Saturation Present? Yes No 4 Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes car..illao r. frin e „
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

TR-W11
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
i
3 D �1 %
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
) % Cover Species? Status
1. 4, C.!f
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Total Cover
50% of total cover� 20% of total cover
Saolino/ShrubStratum�(Plot size: 4__
- ----
-
2.
---�K- -� rnv
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
5 ° of to
I cover: ---ice 20°�, of total cover. P
Herb Stralum (Plot size:
)
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
L = Total Cover
50% of �� total cover: 2,17 20% of total cover.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plr--=t size; 1 )
141% _
2.
3.
4.
5. _
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover.
Remarics: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Sampling Point: zwe `2'
Number of Dominant Species L.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species y
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: I (A/B)
- --Total ! Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_✓2 - - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'. (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

TR-W11
SOIL
(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of
Depth _Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Loci Texture
100
7- ay'�; h G•r ?� C M 01A
Sampling Point: SWG-V7
Remarks
'T Vie: C=Concentration D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix- MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location; PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators
for Problematic Hydric Soils':
,❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
0
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
D
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Mucky
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
T❑
u
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
(D
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Mad (F10) (LRR U)
T,
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface Al2
( )
�
Iron -Manganese Masses F12 LRR O, P, T)
9 ( ) (
Indicators of h ro h is vegetation and
Yd p Yt� 9
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 1BOA, 1SOB)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C,153D)
n Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
j Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: --
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No V
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

5pir.-1)1 TR-W12
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: ! ti F City/County: _.. Sampling Date:
Applicant/Omer �^ State: , Sampling Point: -61 Volk
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: ,
Landfonn (hillslope, terrace;.etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): �Z
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): A' / Lat. ,� _ Long: '� a . °7" "' �Datum:
. ng
Soil Map Unit Name: ��"" ! C NWI dassification:P
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes li No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Welland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
rrrP---riimary Indicators (minimum of one is reauirec
Surface Water (Al) T�
High Water Table (A2) I
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (Bi) rr�
Sediment Deposits (B2) TL
Drift Deposits (83) I
Q Algal Mat or Crust (134)
a Iron Deposits (135)
a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Water Table Present? Yes �f _ No
Saturation Present? Yes _ No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge,
Remarks:
Secondarv)nrr_i_cators__minim__m oftwo required
ieck all that apply)
0 Surface Soil Cracks (66)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (610)
I
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
8
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Thin Muds Surface (C7)
Iff Geomorphic Position (D2)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
0 Shallow Aquitard (D3)
II FAC•Neutral Test (D5)
n Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
I—K Depth (inches):
•_ Depth (inches): 10
Depth (inches): P
well, aerial photos, previous
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

TR-W12
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: SIN -b1.%- �
_ Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: m ) % Cover s? Status
1.
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant 57
2.
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
7
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 01/ (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover._ 20% of total cover.
FACW species _ x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 0 )
FAC species _ — x 3 =
FACU species x4=
,_ _
UPL species x 5 =
3. �;
Column Totals: -._ (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6•
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7
T 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
= Total Cover
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
% of total cover. 20% of total cover. Y
Herb Stratum (Plot sije: )
'Indicators hydric hydrology
Y
of soil and wetland must
1. 'r, ,A s *i d
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2•
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
6.
7
8.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10. _.._ n_
Woody vine —All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12. _...
= Total Cover
--------- -----
50% of total cover. T 20% of total cover.
Woody one Stratury ,(Plot size: _ yp� )
1. lF► 5 1 l��A,tj
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover. �'_ 20% of total cover
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
TR-W 12
! Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) ° Color [moist % Type Loc' Texture
4 2 100
Sampling Point:
_ Remarks
'T�;�e: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS -Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric SoiIS3:
0
Histosol (Al)
0 Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR 3, T, U) 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR S)
D
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
TOTi
Depleted Matrix (F3) u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
❑n
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions I_I Very Shallow Dark Surface
Q
(A8) (LRR
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
(F8) (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) D Other (Explain in Remarks)
D
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
f] Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
D
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
0 Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P. T) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (1713) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
II
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C,153D)
D Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (it observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

TR-W12
Project/Site: -_ ___--
Applicant/Owner.
Investigator(s):
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
)
City/County: Aw
State:
Section. Townshio. Ranae:
Sampling Date: V;P
Sampling Point: S
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): - _ may/ ..V, G Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (°k):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): = -� '-4. Lat: ° Long: ' -- `.''::� Datum: P ��
Soil Map Unit Name: - 4. ' NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes -
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
No (If no, explain in Remarks.) /
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No - Is the Sampled Area J
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No _ within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No _
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Surface Water (Al)
Ll
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
High Water Table (A2)
0
Mari Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide
LJ
Water Marks (61)
�L-Jr
LJ
Oxidized Rtt&6pheres along Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (132)7
Drift Deposits
0
?resence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils
_
1J
(B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
B
(C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
[�
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
0.
Water -Stained Leaves (89)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (86) --
0 x
•:�+;; `.'egetated Concave Surface (88)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
0 Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
0 Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): V
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
_includes cajilla:. fringe)_
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

TR-W12
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover es? Status
3. J� __ n
4
Sampling Point: 5�-1177
Dominance Test worksheets
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ® (A/B)
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of tot�l cover._ 2Q% of total cover.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: F )
1. _....__u- 1�
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
�% of total cover: 20% of total cover.
Herb Stratum ,(Plot size: f, ]
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover._ 2Q% of total cover.
WoodKUne Stratum (Plot ize: ° )
I. i�l�� nr'_ ���►0 _
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: ---1 '! 20% of total cover. r
Total ", Cover of:
Multiply bv:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species _
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
�2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and welland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SaplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

TR-W12
SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
ches Color (moist) _ % _ _Color
{moist) % Tvae Loc�
Texture Remarks
_
+y
i 1 1 i!�` - 100
g
•1psi
100
'0611.n
'Tune. C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS --Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
0
Histosol (A1)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
i cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dario Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR S)
0
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
J Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
-�-nn Piedmont Fioodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1536)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence U)
Depleted Dark Surface (177)
Redox Depressions
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
(A8) (LRR
(F8)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (1710) (LRR U)
D Other (Explain in Remarks)
0
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
D
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
0
iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
jj
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Guff Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

TR-W39 (TR-W13 through TR-W71)
,/ WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and
Gulf Coastal Plain Reg !on
J aid
t.Fn-. C�rnnllnn h�+a� F Cr f
ApprcdnoOwner " ✓ 0L f� i i:X eAlStale 5ampr,n3 point 0+ -170 1 y4 FY
Invesl+gskr r{sk �,"` "/' r `'' " Sealion,Tovnship Rangy-
Landfo m fndlslr,i34� INraCe etc) fit` ' ' ¢+, Locat relief (canum, convex, none).:: Slaps
Subregion (LRA or MLRAj i / a ..-_. _ Leo �. !".% ° r Lin fr a Relum
Soil Map lint Nsme -! ` ' } d d'a H4'VI e10351 Caton; _�
Are Oirnatic; hydrologic conditions on the slle typrcal for ibis time of year? Yes, No (11 no explain in Rmarks.)
Are Vegelah:)n _ ,$oil , or Homology ,,,gn,fvi;wnily disturded? ,ore `Normal C rcurnslanCes'preserll? Yes No
Are Vegetaton Soil _ or Hydrology , ,, I%- wcblern®lic? I.I' needed. explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map sho ong sampling pc]Ir1t Jacations, tralnsects, important features, fits.
Hypropnyt'� Vegetatiuirl Presenl? Yes h# ----
6g ttxr+ fi:_+mplrtd A•ea
hwd„� �]r,i W7r'S^_-n" Yes f
wi1hin a wetland'? Yes No
Wt:tl,.rd I-Ivt1r )IL;gy Pjeser.,? Yes Fla
R�rS' rr,5.
HYDROLOGY
WellandFI oral
Y ogy inditatoes:
—
SecandarV irrdieatars lminrrnqm of hlequ_ire
Pririri,ry 101101rs mrrN(fgV11 4I MNe
is +e4uited,
ChECk all That -opplyI
Surface Sail Cracha (Bit)
Su,rfac� Water lAt l
_•
Aguatir-Fauna (613)
_
Sparsely Vegetated Concave 8Ud9r.e iAF)
High Vy,�k,-r Table (A2)
!
Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U) _
nrainage Pattems 1B101
_Z5aluralion (A3)
—
Horegen Sulfide Oder (C1)
R Mons Trim Llr,e5 (R16)
_ Water Marks (131)
_
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Romrs IC3)
_ DrySeasan Water Table ( )
Sediment Deposits CB21
„
Presence of Reduced Irian ,Cat
C-foyfish Surrrw is CS]
C-ff Depowls (BS)
Reoen! ran fieduo,or, w TAled SCNls (C6i
_ SPaiiration'Visible on Aerial lma;tt"y lCoi
Ploa,i Mat or CrUSl (B41
Tian %luck Surface SC;!)
Cmmorphl,_ P' sltlpn Q21
Iron Deposits (I851
_
Dili Dr (Exrlain in Remarks)
_ Shallow r1c_,te d iD3l
�. Inundaiiory Visible en Aerial Imagery (107)
FAC-Neutralest ,D51
Wafer Stained Leam (DO)
_ Sphagrlurn moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
l=ield flltls Prvatlarli:
_ ..._,.
-- -
-
SurraceWale,Present? Yas
No
Depth i inches); �
Water Tattle Present? Yes
alp
Depth (in�a?s);
Saturatinn Present't yes
� Mo
Denth Iinchesl'
V"112"d Hwdrelbav present? V" No
(indudes caprlla ! Matie)
Dewibe Recorded t}ala (SlrEaal•i gadge. MONtaring well. aerial pholps. previous inspections), if availabhe-
Relmarks�
. • ,� ,�. r� � � a. � � �':� -fir ��r� , �"r+.� r , �� +'� , ,�,..r ��'
r
i`i..��'►' Ate ,?J`'�`�' 0'. 7 �p 1. ar/71 0,04",je
4s' 4.�F�"rca
US Army Carps of Engineers Atlaaft and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.D

VEO L-rA T 10 N (FOW F Strata) - Use 5 C 112 - i C r-,Z3 rne S of punts
Araoijle Domneml Indrit-i
�!7-fliu I P:," size
1.
3.
4
- , Ctal ti:Cwet
50"", of tdal calm
20% of total cover-.
jivialShrub Nra,
WIM we:
2
5.
TmLil C(m,
50% d lotal cover.
20 % of Iota I c avef
Herh&wum (Pint Gj2er
3.
4,
5.
5.
7.
10,
11
12.
Total Cover
0% cf t v w cover,
200A Of betel, emmr
Woody
trine Stratum (Plot size
4
5.
= Total Cover
,"lo of total cover: 20 %. of tote) paver:
,bolog a al ad alyt alion 6 below).
S81rnphnq Point
Mumbur e Dorminaml Species
That Are 0 EL F ACW or FAC:
Total NUrriver of Dominant
Sp ecier, AC' os 6 AJ I Stre la:
Duceeit of Dorninafil Spec�es
Tha' P-e OBIL, FA.c_',,,' Cr FAC
At
-C' Val L , n -1 .3 1 Id ki x wo rn sh & oi;
Tani ::,r of
MUltiDlY bV,
ORIL Lif-ecie6
x 1
i7ACW 8pecit-s
x 2
FAC species
)r 3
FACU species
x 4
UPIL spades
xS=
Cclumr? Totals:
(A) (B)
P-eva le nice Index =; SfA =
Hydrophylic Vegel:atlon Indicators:
I - Rapid Test kx HyUrophytin Vq!getillion
2 • Dominup.ce Test ,s '50%
3 Prevalence pndex is $3.01
Problemabc '1yjro;)h1)tiCVeqeIft6On1 (Exp[atn)
Troa - Wooc r IP. -its_ 1. IL d I n g Vi W? j� .7 E cm; or
mu,wiu
height.
Sap 1 1 nq;Sli r u b - V-� Q:,d-y plants. e xcl u ding Vii km
the 1 ,I, F,PP and gi eale. :1­11-1 a 26 ft ii M)felr
Herb - All ­tocuw; 'r-:)n-,xDDdy) plans, feqdrdless
i - v. uW y plid i i-. '.h sn 3 . 2b It till.
i %'Jondywine -All wonirty Yim-, grenTer 1:01un
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Pment? Yes ZN.
US Army Carps of Evinginews Atlanti t and Gulf Coastal Min Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Prafl!e De%crlpllon: (aescrtbe to the Jepth noerded I document the Indcafar nr rrrnfrrm the absence
Depth _Vatnx _ Ra:icx Feet,ire s
(irrthec,) Calor (mdsi) 04 COW rrnost; _ m --_— Type Loe` ell° re
Srr.rrIina Pant,
I r3
PerAr
Tx[e G=l:cn�ntra l-L� rrcrr:®IJI=Pcc_�:eLjMur,F_NIS=Mdskc,95aild6rair5
_O;ulix,r_-P�3'�_nr h1-"Anlri�
Hydric Snil lwtdicatr3rs: (Applicab4n in all LRR,,,,
L.nlass cthe wisa noted_)
In(ficatvra faf FrobternatiC HYdfIG SQlIS':
Histcscr rA II a
Folpioit.t 6elcw udrtaWC $, T. UI
1 M,,==k 'A'.;i tLRR a,
_ IlAr1c Lpipedm(N) _
Trim) C7rr: S.irtrlcc( a-) (LRR S, T. U
_ _ ri.ti, 1.9,,=_w, iA10:1LRR S)
back Frsuc (A3)
L 3r: Mucky Mii�,ral t= 1: ,,LRR 01
_ Reduced ve-tic i F1k; tqu-tcidc AILA 1510A,101l
H;dro"rSuMcle(M�
Loam,��PyLtiMairr.;F?:
Fr,cdr,cnlrlcr-Jpainrl�e:,Ll,n p F. 71
_
_ S,roli lcd LFj'r:"5'p.5! :�CNploluo Matrix (r _f,
J
_ Arium.lo�s br qh: Loerry t,w,il .'
0,g-,inir Rod i;N), I L R R P. T, Jj _
Redd Cant Siirt&7!,N ,,; fi;
(MLRA 153Bj
_1 Mucky Mine -el ,A r ILRR P. T U)
❑cVlelyd C-hA S.rlwca: ;F; ,
._ RkA I w(l '1l Maticia (TF2)
_ Mijc t Prescn,.;: iA�i ltin M U)
Redox Qepres>,rns I Ai
Very Shal+o'r Dark 5ur`ace M12)
1 cm ILRR P, T)
man ir1o) ILRR U)
_ Cher (E� pra n If,. fRarnwlI sl
_ L1eplq;tQd Csel 'h :JDrkSW%CE (P111)
❑epleted"rhri,1 11: (PALRA 151)
ThrcK Dark S: +v:P o."! "`
Iran-W- nganw; ! FA;: ;_, ti l,F,2, (IR,R 0, P, T)
'Indlmhus of hydrophVic veget at. orl and
_ Cast Prain* R0JcK ,,L 16 (MLRA 150A)
Urnbrlc Surtac, ? ;F 1st, I L R R P. T, U)
wellarld hydrology mint to arese it.
Sandy Mucky Wne.fal i x l , ILRR 0, S)
Delta Ochnc (F 17 iM LRA 151 I
unless disturbed cr prahlerrahc
Sen&iy: lryed x: 3I' _ R6dLItedVert ic,F1dlIMLRA 151?A, 15UBI
Sandy Rocky :,SS) Redsrrmf rIcadplain Sa4s,FIPi (ML A 1,9AA]
i �?.rlpped f,Aatrlx iSo) Anomalaus [It 4ht Loamy Soils (F2C i (M L RA t.19A. 153C•, 153D}
_ DarM SLOOfe (Si) (LER P, 5, T. U)
Rostrlctivn Layer II+ ensrrrved),
T}p e
Depth (inche!; . Hydric $ptl Present? Yes __..._ _ _
Remarks
U5 Airy Carps of Engineers Mont. c and GukF Coastal Plain Region —Version ZO

WETt.ANO DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf CGZISEal Fiar 11 key iutl
Proleclf5de: J f iv .r f ,_ y , Cilymounty_ r ,.� mpl ng Dole.% -
p,ppliwnVCW1*r 2Ly ." °' Stale /ef S9rnplinC� Ptilnt: r'%- r 'i
I^vr?glgator(s) Section Township. Range
La"low (hillslope. terrace, elC � lr f� �!r.5A1t � �'1 _ Local relpef (coneave c4nuex, nooe). l �c"•r�' Skq*
+ k Rat A';' ! Lan = L Dalurri if
5uG°e{ii�ar1 RlKtrZ or PUILR4}• _ � — g _.
�< m
Soil Map unt Name
'` > '' ,.rr f '► .. _ NVVI Jassiftralari:
...!:+�.� �®_..—�. _ ,.
Are climalic I hydratogic con:itipns on the s,td typical lof thi3 time of y&&r? Yes � No 11 no expinm in Fierior".)
:•.rfr .-
rrtauSra . $oil . or Hydrology `-ignificanlly disturbed? Are `.%Uh J i_: •ci,ni anceu, preserit? Yes - No
A;z 'vr-2jctatian Soil. _ _ _ of Hydrology _. _ r a�' l y proble4n=.- ' „r'eded, ' , : =.r1'f ar$Wa .rs ir- Remw k t
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site reap showing s3nlpiing paint iacai.tans, transects, important features, etc.
Hyttrop1,ytic Vugwaboo Presanl!7 'yes No is the Sampled ArK
h0r:: Soll Present? Yes tsl4 wRhin a Welland?
Weland ktydrotcgyi Preserrr7 Yes � No
Rama*s
HYDROLOGY
Wotland Hydrolopy Indic; tors;
Pt nr;N t -cl -,!}.r:,, .a, ,".u.r L.l .[rru rya"t..�r7'a, UtnaLK. 1' h6at
$r,i1'arg VV�htr"i �A - _
An,jat.0 Fau,nx tr;13)
Nigh Water Tame ,.A�; _
Merl Dmosris $15) (LRR Ul
salvation (A31
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ct)
Water Marlys (131 Rhirospheres alono living nools (C3)
Sertmem Deposris (1132) _
Presente of RE&C.ed Iron (CO
_ Dr,fi [)epooaits (s3j s _
FiPeen r Iran Redi-nun w in fit led S®iIs (G6
Algal Fria[ or C(u5L454)
Trim MucR Surface (C7I
lrbri Deposils 405)
Other (Expt; lrM in R-IMAOS
irurdaticn Visible nn Aprial rrn,-gery 187)
'sailer 51AWU LFlBve!S (89)
Field ObservAtivrl8:-
Surlace Water• Prprmrrt9 •Yes 46
depth (inchesl
Water ladle Present'r Yes No
� Depth tlnGlies):
Yea _
r: $Urra�u Soil GrackS (UG)
_ Sparsely Vegela-ed Cnncawe Surface (N)
DKa+nage Patlems (810)
_ Moss Trim L roes 1(111P!18k
Ckry-Season Water Tahle (t'2)
Crayfrsh BJrrcm, it`s
Saiurat.on Vidal -',Cr,al imagery tCo)
Geolmorphic pos, ~:r, (Dd)
SMi law Aquitard I D3)
;AC -Neutral Test (DR)
Spnagnum mass (08) )LRR T. Uj
Saturation Present" Yes No _::f Depth (inches): Welland Hydrology Present? Yes
(cndu•des r-apdlarTr trinjjey _ j
Desuitae ReCa[ded Data (slream gauge mondoring wail. ae ial ptlotas premus Inspections). If a ilable
I Remarks
No
US Army Corps DI Engineers Awntic and Cxulr cu =i Pi ain Region - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -Use scientific names of plants
y Atxdute Damhenl Irdreator
Tfee : ,ratun (plot Size. } % Cover Sotof �aius
v� r;
2.
4
5
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total wver: 20% of total raver: _
Z_PD'in hrub utr�lUr'n iPid size
1.
2.
3,
d.
5.
6.
e,
5t}dJ6 of td91 c,aver:
� • ` 2I}°�a Ut tsrl8l cn.�r
Herb Stralurn (Plot Size:2.
}
4.
5
6.
7,
1 Q,
12.
_
Total Cover
50% of. total caMr;
" t � 20% of total cover: r J
r.
s �
ot7d�1
Vf [tic St.fAtum I Plot size
3-
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% Of t0t6I cover
� � 20% of total emt_ �
marks: flictiserwd. list mornholoo"l adavlatlons
_ n
tjmpling Po ryt_
❑nminance TP%1 urnrkshcAt'
Nurnhe- cf Dw., nant 5pt ties
That AreC --K YA(MI.orFAC: ', (A)
Tci,.I N.,mhe, of f]rxr, n;ant
SpecaesAcross Aj Smata Igt
PercenT of Dorr)lnrint Spec es
7hct/IxeC;�L -ACW or FAQ (AB)
revaleir•ce Index wrorksheel:
Tot e1 e/a : corer of_
Mrlultinlyby:
06 spc .ios
x 1 =
FA(_ SGctiies
x3f�
FAr-L spes
x 4 =
UPL spucws
x 5 =
Lorurnr 'T0!3Is,:
(A) tB)
I' evalcnce l-,)dux = EVA =
Fiydwphyrtic Vt-gelallon Indlcdta,s:
_ 1 - Rapid TESL for ily MhytIc l+ece`e1irn
2 - Dominance Test is >ni
3 - Prevarence Index 1% S3.0
_ Pri*lemrih^ rfy&oph}tic Vegetolion' (Eaplarn)
IIndicatcr, of hydric soil an. ?vc[Iar,:j r, ft ac�y �,ruxt
he prese-I ur'ess dis!t,ted or Frwlcm2 ic.
06flnitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Trig -Woody plants, excludsit; vines. 3 In. (7.6 cm: or
incre in diarmter at breastrteight (08H), regar0ess of
height,
SaMingiShrub -'thinody plants, e):Mding vines. less
then 3 in IJBH and gi,eater khan 3 :B tt (1 mIt tall.
Herb - All rerbaAouS iI)M-woodyY nlarut9. regardless
of Si2e. find avocf°yr plants es than � fl IaIt
Woody vine - All xocr?j N rs a eater ['an `t �8 ♦1( r
heiyrt.
Hydrophytic
vege'tallan
Prestxrt7 YGS No
US Army Corps of Engineers Allanhe and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - V'erston 2.0

SOIL Sompling Pont / I "';
Profilt0escriptlon: (06scribe to the deplM rteekdedloillmument the Inill-natee or coniffirm [hs absence ot End[emors
Orpth %19trix— Ream Features
77,
Tvrj,' C=Cuimlrrac: C-Dt-vt:I(Yb.
",j.j to 5 7 4&j I,-; V lj S 0 " d C r di r i S
!-Cc Bti�mi aebilivq V=lMat-ix
hydnr. Soil iApp 1c, all LRR4,
vzs Qtherv,.i5.P notild.}
In Ji L; ait o rs, fu Problematic Hydi-i c S ai I
H ist o,;k;J
F'o Yv: L - F—,- I ;pw '-. rtF -„, e 1. R R S T. U I
'n Mick (A.91 (LRR OI
I i s, i c Lip i ped on 0-2'
I i in L,3rk S . rTE CIR ISM) (LRR Z , 7, LJ.i
m, PA j ck (Al 0) { L R R $
Black kA3:
L Dam'y mucky N6,mr? (F I ) ILKH Q�
Reckj4ed Ver,ir Wlb: loutFpdu MLRA 150A.B)
H ydrog cr 8 -- fde ! ol 4:
Lccarn} Cley,,:d Mot(-,4 IF2f
P.edrwyv l"Inodpic,in, �ctls irIS: (LRR r, S, 7l
Sheitlhtd I-Eook: b fA'-,r
Uroletod Matrix: ',F3)
Pr�.q-,l LcsnnSoll5 1177s-
Orp. nic Roriles (A). IAR P, 1. j:
Rc-.dcw Dark FUrInce. (FG)
IMLRA 153B)
5 cm FAuc -(,y r.1i n u?31 :A, i I L H R P, T, U
Uepleied garb: $jrta" IFY'
W.":J PE7,;nt VBtenal (TF21
Muck F;I,o �4jw o : A L P R IJ I
RrA%>x Depm.5SiC75 ;'7-t
v.-2 ry st-. c, I ow Dark Sufe::e : r i- i
1 C.Tr MLR; k lP.1I I I- R P , T)
fled i-- i
xhei (Explaiop in Rematxt,)
Depleted Mlnw Dark S4jrNoe SA I
r-E pleted Ochrlc i F' 11 iM LIRA 151
Thick Calk Surface (Al 2}
I[M V:mq.1ne%e hl.; i j P -71 (LRR 0. P. Tl
indcators of hy.1puplyiu v(m.getr3jiu,r inn
Cobs! Pr? i, ie Redox (AJ3'1, (MLRA I SO A.
— Urr� it Sirface 1F Q,gL Rk P, T. L)
WetlipniJ hydrology must be present.
Sandy MLJ(.ky Mineral (451,: {LRR C. S)
_ r.-r I! i! ')J) r c, r F ( M L R A 1511
Ullles-- L11541.11[tied of problematic.
Sanity G eyed Wtnx 1541
Redu2eo vcmc i. I P-: (it'l LPA 1 50A, 15OW
Sandy Re dox I S5)
Pi e&-ice, I -- I cod,)l a, n IS ti- I s i -- 1 S � i N L RA 14 9A
b-tl ppe 110", v 1): (36)
Ajimigious Sr,QT LOYP-, if :'ji :MLRA
149A 153C, 1$3D)
L:,6, k 4u rj a c e (S 7 1 : L F R P, S, T, U I
RestrIctive Layer )lfo"tlived).
7ype
Depth (inched:
Hydric Sold Present? Yesz No —
Remarks
US Army Corps all' 12hpinmrs Atlantic Eknd Gulf Coesmi Plalim Region - Vemim 2 0

r
w co
IL
41.
1
+•��,
,•�
4 �
A'ti � ,
y
��6 74 �.. �
,
-
Yt rt i+ pryryp
9 .J
�" a
I
r
i
•
s
a��

- E
o
`..`�.
w
E
a
m
�+.
S IC
m
m �m
Z'Rm
o0R'
Q
co
F�•�
Zm O.V�
d yL0
F i s
�
o
<
O
�
z
0
a
N in
aCL
ZZ
CC
F F
f � y '✓� '
Q
,�1'$ II III
:. t
E
��
a �d a
GO
O/
A
v x
M O
�o
UO
0 0
o
"x
0 0
o 0
tin tin
a
o m
E- n
L�F
GO
CL
Q
s
L
0
AW
j
O
GO
O/ v
V w
O
O
a t
O/
C �
[O �
3 v
ai c
z a
0 0
Q�
N j
j O
N
?) C
Z 0
H �
c

�
o
c
¢
m
�
O_
o
�J
N
c m
O
O
m
zO
m .V
w
E
o
�o�
IL
N
z
~ a
O
�
z
0
a
F
;d.
Q
f
s
\
e
C
N
0 y
r,•
v E
bD
3 n
o a)
v m o
t °0
o
o
— n
CL o
p c
z v E
ai
C
c ai p-
o o c
s — v
7 X tio
o N
r-
CL
i Q
> o
p N
7
a-- U Y_
ma
Y
� O
l
t
d
/.a
4

r
r'
f
�
ra
�
M
j �'

co
w
IL
ti
a `a
r
r,
• , of, r
,
�
'
r
t
µT
10
Y
• tL V I
�
cV
cj
h
o t
� .
m.

IL
to
i
4,
__Ill
�.+-
)
,+� � .�
•�Ra. .
^r
ry
Y
t
�
i t
1R a
- f
-�t�r:
.•ay(ge � � ��
.�
�. _ _ �""? .
� s
fA�S �t" tea.
ix
,'�3, ✓
x.
a�
-.0 b
-.�
a�

nj Y '4'r �w r r t an i • ,R
� 7 R
ri d del ''. se
r r
jc-

Natural Resources Conservation Service Soils Data Fxtmcted fmm Craven County SSURGO data available at http://websoilsurvey.nrts.usda.gov/.
.. - -. .. r-.. riptim,
hins
hirs
Arapahoe fire sanc, aa-
M
M
M
M
flats, d.pressim, --al plains
ces, coastal plains
hirs
coastal plaim, flood plains
M
M
M
flats on nanne terraces, Carolina B.ys on nanne te--, broad
Rains fire ­d, oarn
B.ins line ­d, carn
fl- on .:in. to—s, Carolina Says on rrarin. t—ams, broad
coastal
plain
Tornotle, fine sand, oarn
flats, depressions, coastal plains
T.-otle, fine sand, oarn
on narine terraces, flats on narine terraces, coastal
pdep,essions
lairs
............
III .—��-----
..
'Highlighted fieltls intlicate tlominant soil components.
'Component Flooding/Ponding Duration: As defined by the NRCS within the SSURGO database and available from:http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov.
Brief: 2 to ] days, Long: ] to 30 days, Very Long: mare than 30 days
'Component Fboding/Ponding Frequenry: As defined by the NRCS and available fmm: https://www.nres.usda.gov/sops/PA_NRCSConsumption/download?cid=nreseprd1296628&--pdf
None (blank field): flooding is not probable. Flooding occurs less than once in 500 years. The chance of flooding is nearly 0 percent in any year.
Very rare: flooding is very unlikely but possible under a#remely unusual weather conditions. The chance offlooding is less than 1 percent in any year.
Rare: flooding is unlikely but possible under unusual weather conditions. The chance of flooding is 1 to 5 percent in any year.
Occasional: flooding occurs infrequently under normal weather conditions. The chance of flooding is 5 to 50 percent in any year.
Frequent: flooding is likely to occur often under normal weather conditions. The chance of flooding is mare than 50 percent in any year but is less than 50Y in all months in any year.
Very frequent: flooding is li Rely to occur very often under normal weather conditions. The chance of flooding is mare than 50 percent in all months of any year.

WETS Table data, available from: http://agacis.rcc-acis.org/?fips=37049 (accessed August 14, 2020)
WETS 5laucn NEW (3CFiN - A5O5, NC
0.equesled pears, 1971-2000
red�peren�re rrF
Mrurllr
A.,1
A.,
manly
1 my
J:,r,
N4 1
346
rein
NAG
3F
U.,
FN 7
47
A,
13 6
hG J
Mny
AG]
193
Jun
A67
1F9
Jul
89.2
71 i
Aug
E'I7
70.4
Sep
83.6
653
Cct
719
S32
Nev
669
45
Dec
58.1
17.0
A-1
Av9ra9e
73.2
52.7
slat
STATS TABI F
Total pmdpita6m, (irh9c)
Yr
Jan
Feb
K.
NO@
4.80
1.72
A.41
N01
2.19
276
510
2002
377
2 20
8 12
NO3
221
53,
3.86
2004
120
4 36
257
2005
24Q
261
3.80
20W
24G
1.54
227
2007
3 s2
244
111
2006
2.60
322
335
2909
1 B6
2 09
247
2010
441
371I
316
201,
2.65
323
241
2012
243
222
31s
2313
103
1 31
1 17
n14
3.97
2.56
460
3915
149
M3A9
39G
7'J16
171
031
133
J91 i
17N
1 9!
S J3
201Y
AJ2
1:55
413
M9
397
111
141
?07n
7 05
F N2
121
h'r4r x rJnr.r rnu ";n
F 7' mAr�fra_.r
�:rr:•
w Yrnoo.l.Im
Liss mrss'nS W F'r 6a1� • a nCn^ [v
ree•'f a�en�
C.aaPcc oaf 2P2O9&r,
Precipitation statistics:
I...-:.. , . ....
Precfplred- IInches]
Aa
3n14 nl,nnuu
Avg n-i r
Fw n
daiW
Avg
win hnrrr
of days larch
In1nf
n,c°1
leas lhan
mon
Then
0.10rmmh
snrmaall
44F
41?
:351
h!3
A
nA ��
4l+.
:4 It
714
10.4
F
n9
434
4M
-1tih
5l1
!
Gh
tiJn
359
?is
A119
F
GG
�vr
94h
31.7
s24
r
GG
rFF
SdA
:317
h3%
f
GO
N 3
927
4 62
7 36
9
0.0
79 a
692
4 61
&.15
r4.4
543
3.17
6.60
6
1A
64.1
325
1 4S
396
5
0.0
557
320
199
387
5
0.0
47 5
186
2.57
497
6
05
Si sl
56.OG
62.9
-
5410
01
Measured
precipitation:
Apr
Play
Jun
Jwl
Au®
Sep
Oct
N-
do..:
Anne
6.36
355
1.98
1183
944
$75
013
355
222
55 ^I
1 77
405
569
7 F6
720
0 87
080
1 99
2 @8
.1 .;
I Is
262
4.45
555
450
146
303
369
253.
-12-
716
1010
6.89
sei
512
761
549
200
75..
11_.
295
9.94
4.40
355
963
949
131
29r
248
Jo"
2.49
599
7.21
6r6
119
5is
134r
2`.8
3.68
51 2.
570
315
571
a13
99,
0
321
016
490
5.l.
395
261
416
ip1
13T
309
256
0GO
2G3
17 vG
$03
200
094
499
322
736
142
328
374
di 02
19,
U32
121
365
017
358
1&1
1Od
550
s1-9
052
143
06i
297
626
3G 79
1
106
302
sJ 51
156
947
26G
304
1504
351
202
23s
G72
39O,
2h2
7IG
26G
1i 13
716
4n
397
a51
191
=-r. .e
226
1,79
021
374
G00
3.25.
321
Ads
2.39
12Q
403
192
3t9
652
9.13
7s8
233
37S
1.15
5-V
Inn
7n3
776
7ni
077
666
ei 07
594
Gd3
G631
169
firs
347
171n
h14
11 In
111
111
3N1
6h 31
AN
4A9
166
5:4
81:1
K(lh
4!3
nV
1J3
hi 11
M419
A61
1?7
970
1'39
19 39
1Ad
fill)
6h9
/91f
.1 BE
1F3
414
4ilF
641
6a
]44
aFJ
.119
SJ 24
264
Afh
661
748
im n3.
V%
Delineations for the Trent River Basin were conducted from June 29 through July.
Precipitation in June was above the normal range: 6.67" with a normal range of 3.12" - 5.34".
Precipitation in July was above the normal range: 7.48" with a normal range of 4.62" - 7.36".
Precipitation for April, May, and June was above the normal range: 17.66" with a normal range of 8.52" - 14.64".
Precipitation for May, June, and July was above the normal range: 22.30" with a normal range of 10.96" - 17.92".
Precipitation for the previous year (July through June) was within normal range: 57.82" with a normal range of 51.53" - 58.06".
Precipitation for the previous year (August through July) was above normal range: 61.04" with a normal range of 51.53" - 58.06".

CITY OF NEW BERN
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
City Representative: Matt Montanye, Director of Public Works
(mailing) P.O. Box 1129, New Bern, NC 28563
(shipping) 1004 S. Gienburnie Road, New Bern, NC 28562
mo ntanyemg newbernnc.gov
252-639-7501
The undersigned representative of the City of New Bern does hereby authorize:
Scott Davis and/or
Alexander P. (Sandy) Smith
of Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27604
sdavisC7axiomenvironrnental.org, 919-696-3045
ssmithCc)-axiomenvironmental.org, 919-270-9306
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and
acceptance of jurisdictional determinations, permits, or certifications and any and all
associated standard and special conditions attached.
In addition, permission for access to city property and city -maintained or designated
easements is granted to the above contractors/agents and to agents of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, N.C. Division of Water Resources, and other natural resource
agencies for the purposes of jurisdictional area verifications, permitting coordination,
etc. pursuant to city-wide drainage feature repairs.
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and
accurate to the best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature:
Date: 09/00