20140727 Ver 1_Staff Notes_20151027

g,� m
r' P✓
..ww
X,
ZI
p
N
c.
F
� � � ��,y �� � � f °✓'�, ��.N "$" ' "sue �r ,,.,,„ ,, ,w�
a

77

North(-a[[)hria Department of' Environmental QUaA^fy
Fat McCrory
Governor
1 ?,0"
Octob2015 er
Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Lb[
Attn: Mr. Jack Garvey
2I0I Gateway Centre B|vd, Ste 10O
Morrisville, N[ 27560
Subject: REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Hanson Crabtree Quarry Expansion
Dear Mr. Garvey:
Dmad R, van der Vaad
Secretary
On August 27, 2015, the Division of Water Resources (Division) received your application dated
August 7, 3015, requesting an Individual Water Quality Certification from the Division for the
subject project. The Division has determined that your application is incomplete and cannot be
processed. The application is on-hold until all of the following information is received:
1. Please provide a schematic showing how the turn at Station 0+00 and the tie-in at station
9+53.99 will be accomplished. |I5A NCA[OJH .0506/bV5\l
Title I5A N[A[OZH .0506 requires that a proposed activity has no practical alternative by
xY\Y� demonstrating that, considering the potential fora reduction in size, configuration or
`
density of the proposed activity and all alternative designs, the basic project purpose
�
cannot be practically accomplished in a manner which would avoid or result in less
adverse impact towetlands. Because the preferred alternative does not involve the least
amount of stream and wetland impacts, the Division cannot review this alternative until
N�
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) determines that this alternative is the least
environmentally damaging practical alternative /LEOPA\. Please provide correspondence
from the U3A[E indicating which alternative is selected as the LEDPA.
Pursuant to Title 15A NCAC 02H D502/e\, the applicant Sh8U furnish all of the above requested
information for the proper consideration of the application. If all of the requested information is
not received in writing within 30 calendar days Of receipt of this letter, the Division will be unable
to approve the application and it will bereturned. The return Of this project vvillneCeSSitate
401 &BuMe PennkUn0Un|1
1517 Mail Service CenHy.Rmieigh. North Cand|na27699-1617
Lncakm51%N Salisbury St Raleigh, North Camlina278O4
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone]Q4\ Customer Service: 1 877-628 6748
|nlE,me[�wwwonwoterResuumea.org

Hanson Aggregates Southeast, LLC
DVVR#I4-U727
Request for Additional Information
Page 2 of 2
reapplication to the Division for approval, including a complete application package and the
appropriate fee.
Please re5pOnd in writing within 30 calendar days of receipt of this letter bv sending three copies
Of all ofthe above requested information to the 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC2769q-I6l7,
P|2GSe be aware that you have no authorization under the Section 401 of the [lean Water Act
for this activity and any work done within vv8tpr3 of the state may be a violation Of North
Carolina General Statutes and Administrative Code.
Please contact me at 919-807-6360 or [e-mail] or Jennifer Burclette at 919-
@O7-6S64V[ennifer.bunjet12(4)nCd8nr,gOvif you have any questions 0rconcerns.
Sincerely,
Karen Higgins, Supervisor
4O1& Buffer Permitting Unit
cc: Bob Zarz8cki,Soil & Environmental Consultants, |n[,84I3 Falls ofN2use Road, Ste
104, Raleigh, NC 27615
U5ACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
DVVR RRO4OIfile
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit file

From: Haupt, Mac
Sent: Thursday, October 22,20l52:57PK4
To: 8uvdette, Jennifer a
Cc: Homewood, Sue
Subject: Comments on the Henson Crabtree Quarry Expansion Stream Location
Jennifer,
Here are my comments on the Quarry stream location project:
The question Iam answering im does this conceptual design seem like dwould produce a stable channel?
l. Would have been nice to see o bit more in terms of where structures (plan view might be, l realize h
was x conceptual p|un...
2. It is a good idea to utilize bed material from Stream I to "seed" the bypass channel,
3. 1 am concerned about the nature of the bank material on the north and western sides of the bypass channel where
there will boa near l:|slope,
4. The dimensions based oo the watershed size and curves seem good,
5. I um very concerned about the turn at station 0+00` they need to show with u eobezuutio how this is going to he
done,
a. Also concerned about the downstream tie~bz station 9+53.99
6. They talk uUtde about introducing pattern into the bypass ±botnhn( with structures, also lbclieve I may have aeoo
earlier somewhere they mention a 1.4 sinuosity mentioned, that would be high,
7. These next two observation are not what you were asking me but we can talk later about them:
i. 8 does not seem like the bypass channel makes op for the stream loss, and
ii. What does it mean if the relocated channel im within the pit expansion boundary?
1 will be out in the field Monday and Tuesday next week, but you are welcome \o call ng' personal mobile any time ...Al9-
306-3529
Hope the training went well and see you Wednesday.
Mac
Mac Haupt, LSS
Stream & Wetland Mitigation Coordinator
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Division of Water Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
A10807-G476office
mec hauptC!c�nodenrqov
512N. Salisbury Street, Suite 0424, Raleigh, NC 27804
1017 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC378Q0-1817

Ernail correspondence to and frcvo this address is subject to the
North Carofin,,,: Tkiblic Records 1.a and rnay be dh,,,closed to third parties