20200887 Ver 2_Project_URP PCN_Update_Submitted_20240219

WEPG
Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
SAW — 2020-00946 - BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Project URP
2. Work Type: Private ❑✓ Institutional ❑
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
Government ❑ Commercial 11
PCN request for additional minor impacts for an existing Commercial Development
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Summit Avenue, URP, LLC
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 - or ORM Consultant ID Number]:Danlel Kuefler / WEPG
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
35.3276,-80.7690, Charlotte, NC
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 131a]: 04741213, 04741212, 04741214, 04741215, 04741216
9. Project Location -County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Mallard Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03040105
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓ Section 10 & 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 39
❑ Regional General Permit #
❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
0 Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

February 19th, 2024
Mr. Douglas Perez
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Mr. Andrew Pitner
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street, Suite 301, Moorseville, NC 28115
Mr. Paul Wojoski
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
Wetlands & Storm Water Branch
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Byron Hamstead
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street, Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: AFTER -THE -FACT PCN for NWP # 39 for the Project URP site, Charlotte, Mecklenburg
County, North Carolina
Messrs. Perez, Pitner, Wojoski and Hamstead,
Enclosed is a Request for Nationwide Permit 39 for the Project URP site on +/- 81 acres at the
intersection of Governor Hunt Road and David Taylor Drive in Charlotte, NC. A previous PCN request
(SAW-2020-00946; DWR# 20-0887) was previously approved and the site has been completely
developed with all impacts installed as approved. During construction, minor additional impacts were
unavoidable as site conditions were not conducive to the construction of a spring box behind a large
headwall. As such, 5 LF of intermittent stream and 0.03 ac of wetland impacts were required that were
not accounted for in the previous approval. As shown on the updated attached exhibits, these
modifications include impacts to one stream and one small wetland for fill and grading.
To compensate for the anticipated permanent impacts, the applicant is proposing payment into NCDMS at
a 1:5 ratio for 5 linear feet of intermittent warm water stream. This ratio is proposed as it is the same ratio
that was initially applied to the previously approved impacts to this particular stream feature.
Thank you for your consideration and please contact me if you have any questions, [phone] or
email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Daniel Kuefler, PWS
Len Rindner, PWS
Environmental Scientist
Principal
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Permit Application

on� ,ti
au,�n
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
Water Resources
Office Use Only
Corps Action I D no. SAW-2020-00946 Date received: [Click to enter.]
DWR project no. Irk enter.l Date received: [Click to enter.]
Site Coordinates:
Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): 35.3276
Longitude (DD.DDDDDD): 80.7690
Form Version 4.3, 1210412023
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
(Ver. 4.2, 1210412023)
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits and corresponding Water Quality Certifications
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk are required. The form is not considered complete until all
mandatory questions are answered.
The PCN help document may be found at this link:
https://edocs.deg.nc.gov/WaterResources/DocView.aspx?dbid=0&id=2196924&cr=1
Page 1 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

A. Processing Information
County (counties) where project is located: *
Mecklenburg Additional (if needed).
Is this an ARPA project? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, ARPA project number:
* The project number can be found on the "Letter of Intent to Fund"
(LOIF) or "Offer and Acceptance Letter". If you are unable to locate
Click or tap here to enter text.
your DWI ARPA Funding Project Number, please contact Corey
Basinger at corey.basinger(cilncdenr.gov for further assistance.
Is this a NCDMS project? *
(Click yes only if NCDMS is the applicant or co-
❑ Yes ❑x No
applicant)
Is this a public transportation project?
(Publicly funded municipal, state, or federal road, rail,
❑ Yes ❑x No
or airport project)
Is this a NCDOT project? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, NCDOT TIP or state project number:
Click to enter.
If yes, NCDOT WBS number: *
Click to enter.
❑x Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams, waters,
Clean Water Act)
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: *
❑ Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal
waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted? *
❑x Yes ❑ No
Please provide the date of the previous submission. *
7/7/2020
❑x Nationwide Permit (NWP)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek
❑Regional General Permit (RGP)
authorization? *
❑ Standard (IP)
This form may be used to initiate the standard/ individual permit
process with the USACE. Please contact your Corps
representative concerning submittals for standard permits. All required items can be included as attachments and
submitted with this form.
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? *
® Yes ❑ No
NWP number(s) (list all numbers ):
39
RGP number(s) (list all numbers ):
Click to enter.
Are you a federal applicant?
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, please provide a statement concerning compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Act
Click to enter text.
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from DWR (check all that apply):
❑x 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification— Express
❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
❑ Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
Is this a courtesy copy notification
❑ Yes ❑x No
Page 2 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? *
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: *
❑ Yes
❑x No
For the record only for Corps Permit: *
❑ Yes
❑x No
1f.
Is this an after -the -fact permit/certification application? *
® Yes
❑ No
1g.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts?
® Yes
❑ No
If yes, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program.
1 h.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? *
❑ Yes
❑x No
1 i.
Is the project located within an NC DCM Area of Environmental
Concern (AEC)? *
❑ Yes
❑x No ❑ Unknown
1j.
Is the project located in a designated trout watershed? *
❑ Yes
❑x No
If yes, you must attach a copy of the approval letter from the appropriate Wildlife Resource Commission Office.
Trout information may be found at this link: http://www.saw.usace.army.miI/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Agency-Coordination/Trout.aspx
Page 3 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

B. Applicant Information
1a.
Who is the primary contact?
Daniel Kuefler
1 b.
Primary Contact Email:
[e-mail]
1 c.
Primary Contact Phone: (###)###-####
336-554-2728
1 d.
Who is applying for the permit/certification? (check
all that apply)
❑ Owner 0 Applicant (other than owner)
1 e.
Is there an agent/consultant for this project?
® Yes ❑ No
2.
Landowner Information
2a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Centene Management Company LLC
2b.
Deed Book and Page No.:
click to ent�
2c.
Contact Person (for corporations):
Click to enter.
2d.
Address
Street Address:
7700 Forsyth Blvd
Address line 2:
Click to enter.
City:
Saint Louis
State/ Province/ Region:
MO
Postal/ Zip Code:
63105
Country:
Click to enter.
2e.
Telephone Number: (###)###-####
312-718-9957
2f.
Fax Number: (###)###-####
Click to enter
2g.
Email Address:
[e-mail]
3.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a.
Name:
Matthew Browder
3b.
Business Name (if applicable):
Summit Avenue URP, LLP
3c.
Address:
Street Address:
1440 South Tryon Street, Suite 104
Address line 2:
Click to entE
City:
Charlotte
State/ Province/ Region:
NC
Postal/ Zip Code:
29203
Country
UICK to enter.
3d.
Telephone Number: (###)###-####
646-346-8871
3e
Fax Number: (###)###-####
Click to entr
3f.
Email Address:
[e-mail]
Page 4 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

4.
Agent/ Consultant (if applicable)
4a.
Name:
Daniel Kuefler
4b.
Business Name:
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
4c.
Address:
Street Address:
10612-D Providence Road
Address line 2:
PMB 550
City:
Charlotte
State/ Province/ Region:
NC
Postal/ Zip Code:
28277
Country:
Click to enter
4d.
Telephone Number: (###)###-####
336-554-2728
4e
Fax Number: (###)###-####
Click to entr
4f.
Email Address:
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter:
Attach a completed/signed agent authorization form or letter. A sample form may be found at this link:
https://www.saw.usace.army. mil/Missions/Reg ulatory-Permit-Program/Permits/2017-Nationwide-Permits/Pre-
construction-Notification/
Page 5 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1a. Name of project: *
Project URP
1 b. Subdivision name (if appropriate):
Click to enter.
1c. Nearest municipality/town: *
Charlotte
2.
Project Identification
2a.
Property identification number (tax PIN or parcel ID):
04741216, 04741214, 04741215, 04741212,
04741213
2b.
Property size (in acres):
80.9
2c.
Project Address:
Street Address:
Click to ente.
Address line 2:
Click to enter.
City:
Click to enter.
State/ Province/ Region:
Click to enter.
Postal/ Zip Code:
Click to enter.
Country:
Click to ente
2d.
Site coordinates in decimal degrees (using 4-6 digits
after the decimal point):
Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): 35.3276
Longitude (-DD.DDDDDD):-80.7690
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Mallard Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving
C
water:
The Surface Water Classification map may be found at this link:
https://ncdenr.maps.arcgis.com/apes/webappviewer/index.html?id=6el25ad7628f494694e259c8Odd64265
Yadkin-PeeDee
3c. In what river basin(s) is your project located? {
Choose additional (if needed)
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is
030401050103
located:
The Find Your HUC map may be found at this link:
https://ncdenr.maps.arc.is.com/apes/Publiclnformation/index.html?appid=ad3a85aOc6d644aOb97cdO69db238ac3
Page 6 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of
this application: *
The site has been developed as a commercial campus. General Land Use in the vicinity is a mixture of
commercial and residential development.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
If yes, please give the DWR Certification number and/or Corps
SAW-2020-00946
Action ID (ex. SAW-0000-00000):
(Click to enter.l
Attach any pertinent project history documentation
4b2. Is any portion of the work already complete? *
® Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the completed work.
The Site has been completely built and installed per the previously permitted plans. A small amount of additional
impacts were required during construction based on site constraints and construction logistics.
4c. List of other certifications or approvals/denials received from other federal, state or local agencies for work
described in this application not related to the 404 or 401.
Click to enter text.
4d. Attach an 8'h x 11" excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of
the project site.
4e. Attach an 8'h x 11" excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map
depicting the project site.
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the
0.32 acres
property:
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent
6756 linear feet
and perennial) on the property:
4g1. List the total estimated acreage of all existing open waters on the
property:
acres
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The site is a large commercial campus.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Fill and grading has been completed using standard equipment.
4j. Attach project drawings/site diagrams/depictions of impact areas for the proposed project.
4k. Will this activity involve dredging in wetlands or waters? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, describe the type of dredging, the composition of the dredged material, and the locations of disposal area.
Click to enter text.
Page 7 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

5.
Jurisdictional Determinations
5a.
Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on
the property or in
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
proposed impact areas?
Comments:
,lick to enter text
5b.
If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination,
0 Preliminary ❑ Approved ❑ Emailed concurrence
what type of determination was made?
❑ Not Verified ❑ Unknown ❑ n/a
Corps AID number (ex. SAW-0000-00000):
SAW-2020-00946
Name (if known): Click to enter
5c.
If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional
Agency/Consultant Company: WEPG
areas?
Other: Click to enter
5d.
List the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determination or State determination if a determination was made by
either agency.
06/10/2020
5d1.
Attach jurisdictional determinations.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
Phase 1 — East Campus; Phase II — West Campus (all phases are now complete)
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permit(s) used, or intended to be used, to
authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? This includes other separate and distant crossings
for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -construction
notification.
No
7. Addresses of adjoining property owners, lessees, etc. whose property adjoins the waterbody (if more than can be
entered here, please attach a supplemental list)
Click to enter.
8. Scheduling of activity:
All activities / impacts on the site have been completed
Page 8 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
Impacts Summary
❑x Wetlands ❑x Streams - tributaries
1 a. Where are the impacts associated with your project ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters
(check all that apply):
❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, complete this table for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Site #
2a1.
Impact
Reason/Type
2b.
Impact
Duration
2c.
Wetland Type
2d.
Wetland Name
2e.
Forested
?
2f.
Jurisdiction
Type
2g.
Impact Area
(ac)
W1
Fill (Incl.
Riprap)
Permanent
Headwater
Forest
Wetland H
Yes
Corps
0.03
W2
Choose one
Tempi Herm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/i ,
Choose one
Click to enter
W3
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose onE
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W4
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W5
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W6
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W7
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W8
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W9
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose onE
Click to enter
Y/I
Choose one
Click to enter
W10
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W11
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W12
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W13
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W14
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W15
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose onE
Click to enter
Y/1
Choose one
Click to enter
2g1. Total temporary wetland impacts
0 ac
2g2. Total permanent wetland impacts
0.03 ac
2g3. Total wetland impacts
0.03 ac
2h. Type(s) of material being discharged and the amount of each type in cubic yards:
.TICK to enter text.
2i. Comments:
W1 was previously approved and has been installed
Page 9 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream/ tributary impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site,
complete this table for all stream/ tributary sites impacted.
** All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government
3a
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
3h.
Site #*
Impact
Impact
Impact Type*
Stream Name*
Stream
Jurisdiction
Stream Width
Impact length
Reason*
Duration*
Type*
Type*
(avg ft) *
(linear ft)
S1
Road Crossing
Permanent
Crossing/
Stream C
Intermittent
Corps
3
152
Culvert
S2
Construction
Temporary
Dewatering
Stream C
Intermittent
Corps
3
20
Access
S3
Construction
Temporary
Workpad/
Stream C
Intermittent
Corps
3
20
Access
Causeway
S4
Fill for
Permanent
Fill (Incl.
Stream G
Intermittent
Corps
3
76
Daycare
Riprap)
S5
Retaining Wall
Permanent
Fill (Incl.
Stream G
Intermittent
Corps
3
5
Riprap)
S6
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S7
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S8
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S9
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S10
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S11
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S12
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S13
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S14
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S15
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S16
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S17
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S18
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S19
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S20
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
3i1. Total jurisdictional ditch
Click to enter. linear ft
impact:
3i2. Total permanent stream
233 linear ft
impacts:
M. Total temporary stream
40 linear ft
impacts:
34. Total stream and ditch
273 linear ft
impacts:
3j. Comments:
Impacts S1-S4 were previously approved. S5 is for additional after -the -fact impacts. All impacts are installed.
Page 10 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

4.
Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other
open water of the U.S., individually list all open water impacts in the table below.
4a.
Site #*
4a1.
Impact Reason
4b.
Impact
Duration*
4c.
Waterbody Name*
4d.
Activity Type*
4e.
Waterbody
Type*
4f.
Impact area
(ac)*
01
Click to enter.
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Choose one
:hoose one
Click to enter.
02
Click to enter.
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Choose one
-hoose one
Click to enter.
03
Click to enter.
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
04
Click to enter.
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
05
Click to enter.
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
4g.
Total temporary open water impacts
Click to enter. ac
4g.
Total permanent open water impacts
Click to enter. ac
4g.
Total open water impacts
Click to enter. ac
4h.
Comments:
Click to enter.
5.
Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction is proposed, complete the table
below. (*This
does NOT include offline stormwater
management ponds.)
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Pond ID
Proposed use or
Wetland Impacts (ac)
Stream
Impacts (ft)
Upland
#
purpose of pond
Impacts (ac)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click tc
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
entF
P2
Choose one
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
entF
P3
Choose one
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
5f.
Total
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
ente
5g.
Comments:
Click to enter.
5h.
Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, permit ID no.:
Click to enter.
5i.
Expected pond surface area (acres):
Click to enter.
5j.
Size of pond watershed (acres):
Click to enter.
5k.
Method of construction:
Click to enter.
Page 11 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

6. Buffer Impacts (DWR requirement)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. Individually list all buffer impacts.
6a. Project is in which protected basin(s)?
(Check all that apply.)
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba
❑ Jordan ❑ Goose Creek ❑ Randleman
❑ Other: Click to ente
Site #*
6b.
Impact Type*
6c.
Impact Duration*
6d.
Stream Name*
6e.
Buffer
Mitigation
Required?*
6f.
Zone 1 Impact*
(sq ft)
6g.
Zone 2 Impact*
(sq ft)
131
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter
B2
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter
B3
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter
B4
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter
B5
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B6
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B7
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B8
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B9
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B10
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
1311
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B12
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B13
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B14
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B15
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B16
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B17
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
B18
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B19
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B20
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
6h. Total temporary impacts:
Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft
Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6h. Total permanent impacts:
Zone 1: Click to enter sq ft
Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6h. Total combined buffer impacts:
Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft
Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6i. Comments:
LACK to enter.
Please attach supporting documentation (impact maps, plan sheets, etc.) for the proposed project.
Page 12 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through project design:
Overall impacts to site surface waters associated with the proposed development were limited through site
selection, design and location/orientation of proposed access routes. Bottomless culverts are proposed were
practicable to avoid impacts. Approximately 54% of the site has remained as undisturbed tree -save.
Approximately 96% of the 6,761 LF of streams and 97% of th 0.35 ac of wetlands on site will be avoided.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving
conveyances. Crossings have been minimized using headwalls and 2:1 slopes to avoid additional impacts Utility crossings have been bored
wherever possible.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S., Waters of the State, or Riparian Buffers
2a. If compensatory mitigation is required, by whom is it required? ❑ DWR ❑x Corps
(check all that apply)
2b. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this ❑ Mitigation Bank
project? (check all that apply) ❑x In Lieu Fee Program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if using a Mitigation Bank
(Must satisfy NC General Statute143-214.11 (d1).)
3a. Name of mitigation bank:
Click to enter.
3b. Credits purchased/requested:
Type: Choose one
Quantity Click to ente
Type: Choose one
Quantity 'ick to enter.
Type: Choose one
Quantity ick to enter.
Attach receipt and/or approval letter.
3c. Comments:
Click to enter.
4.
Complete if Using an In Lieu Fee Program
4a.
Attach approval letter from in lieu fee program.
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
5 linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
warm
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington
District's RIBITS website: (Please use the filter and select Wilmington district)
https://ribits.usace.army.miI/ribits apex/f?p=107:27:2734709611497::NO:RP:P27 BUTTON KEY:O
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
Click to enter. square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
Click to enter. acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
Click to enter. acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
Click to enter. acres
Page 13 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

4h. Comments:
lick to enter.
5. Complete if Providing a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If proposing a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan,
including mitigation credits generated.
,lick to enter
5b. Attach mitigation plan/documentation.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — DWR requirement
6a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer
❑ Yes ❑x No
that requires buffer mitigation?
If yes, please complete this entire section — please contact DWR for more information.
6b.
If yes, identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires
mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required in the table below.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
Choose one
Click to enter.
Zone 2
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
Choose one
Click to enter.
6f. Total buffer mitigation required
Click to enter.
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or
❑ Yes ❑ No
NC Division of Mitigation Services proposed?
6h.
If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services.
6i.
Comments:
Click to enter.
Page 14 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (DWR requirement)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers
❑ Yes ❑x No
identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of stormwater treatment. If the
project is subject to a state implemented riparian buffer protection program, include a plan that fully documents
how diffuse/dispersed flow will be maintained.
All Stormwater Control Measures (SCM) must be designed in accordance with the NC Stormwater Design
Manual (https://deg.nc..qov/about/divisions/energv-mineral-land-resources/energv-mineral-land-permit-
guidance/stormwater-bmp-manual).
Associated supplement forms and other documentation must be provided.
❑ Level Spreader
What Type of SCM are you
❑ Vegetated Conveyance (lower seasonal high water table- SHWT)
providing?
❑ Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
(Check all that apply)
0 Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
❑ Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the
buffer
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here.
Attach diffuse flow documentation.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
Is this an NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's
Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
El Yes 0 No
2b.
Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as
defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)? *
❑ Yes 0 No
To look up low density requirements, click here:
http://reports.oah. state. nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-%20environmental%20guality/chapter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20h/15a%20ncac%2002h%20.1003.pdf
2c.
Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP)
0 Yes ElNo
reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -
approved local government stormwater program? *
❑ n/a — project disturbs < 1 acre
Note: Projects that have vested rights, exemptions, or grandfathering from state or locally implemented
stormwater programs or projects that satisfy state or locally -implemented stormwater programs through use of
community in -lieu programs should answer "no" to this question.
2d.
Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply?
0 Local Government
(Check all that apply.)*
❑ State
If you have local government approval, please include the SMP on their overall impact map.
Local Government Stormwater Programs *
0 Phase II ❑ USMP
❑ NSW ❑ Water Supply
Page 15 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
City of Charlotte
State Stormwater Programs * 0 Phase II ❑ HQW or ORW
❑ Coastal Counties ❑ Other
Comments:
Click to enter.
Page 16 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local)
❑ Yes ❑x No
funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require
preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental
❑ Yes ❑x No
Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been
finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the
❑ Yes ❑x No
NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)
Comments:
Click to enter.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A
NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300),
Federally Non -Jurisdictional Wetlands /Classified Surface Waters
❑ Yes ❑x No
(15A NCAC 2H. 1400) DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. If you answered "yes" to the above question, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
ACK to enter.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future
impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby
❑ Yes ❑x No
downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "no", provide a short narrative description:
All work has been completed and no additional phases are anticipated.
3c. If yes, provide a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWR
policy. (Attach .pdf)
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? 1 ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
4b. If yes, describe in detail the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a treatment plant, list the capacity
available at that plant.
Wastewater generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via sewer lines.
Page 17 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected
® Yes ❑ No
species or habitat? (IPAC weblink: https://www.fws.gov/ipac/ ffws.govl)
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species
❑ Yes ❑x No
Act impacts? *
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Choose one
5d. Is another federal agency involved? *
❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown
If yes, which federal agency?
Click to enter.
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Divisions 1-8? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the
U.S.? *
® Yes ❑ No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
5g1. If yes, have you inspected the bridge for signs of bat use such as
staining, guano, bats, etc.? Representative photos of signs of bat use
❑ Yes ❑ No
can be found in the NLEB SLOPES, Appendix F, pages 3-7.
Representative photos of signs of bat use can be found in the NLEB SLOPES, Appendix F, pages 3-7. Link to
NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf
If you answered yes to 5g1, did you discover any signs of bat use? *
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
If yes, please show the location of the bridge on the permit drawings/ project plans
5h. Does this project involve the construction/ installation of a wind
turbine(s)? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, please show the location of the wind turbine(s) on the permit drawings/ project plans (attach .pdf)
5i. Does this project involve blasting and /or other percussive activities
that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers,
❑ Yes ❑x No
mechanized pile drivers, etc.? *
If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this
activity on the property (attach .pdf)
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated
Critical Habitat? *
A threatened/Endangered species assessment was conducted prior to site development in which no species were identified.
Attach consultation documentation.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as
an Essential Fish Habitat? *
El Yes ❑x No
Is there submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) around
the project vicinity? *
El Yes ❑x No El Unknown
Will this project affect submerged aquatic vegetation? *
❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown
Page 18 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

Explain: Click to enter.
6b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No essential fish habitat in this region
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data):
http://gis. ncdcr.,qov/hpoweb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural
preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or
❑ Yes ❑x No
properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological
resources? *
Report by R.S. Webb is attached. State Historic Preservation Office's (SHPO) database http://gis.nednr.gov/hpoweb/
7c. Attach historic or prehistoric documentation.
8.
Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https:Hmsc.fema.,qov/portal/search
8a.
Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
® Yes ❑ No
8b.
If yes, explain how the project meets FEMA requirements.
Impacts are allowed by FEMA and are permitted locally through Mecklenburg County's Floodland Development Permit process.
8c.
What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
www.fema.gov; FEMA's Community Floodway Map #3710457700K and as surveyed and represented on project survey.
H. Miscellaneous
Comments:
Click to enter.
Attach pertinent documentation or attachments not previously requested
Page 19 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

I. Signature *
❑x By checking the box and signing below, I, as the project proponent, certify to the following:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete, to
the best of my knowledge and belief;
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time;
• The project proponent hereby agrees that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter
66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• The project proponent hereby agrees to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66,
Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• The project proponent hereby understands that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be
enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• As the project proponent, I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN/online form.
Full Name: * Daniel Kuefler
Signature:
Date: * 2/19/2024
Page 20 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

Wetlands
Leonard S. Rindner. PLLC.
Agent Authorization Letter
The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and/or certification(s).
Project/Site Name: Project URP
Property Address: Governor Hunt Road, Charlotte, NC
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 04713104
Select one: I am the current property owner
Name: i*0oveZ
Company: '5N1M111-"-r N+cvLV. k-10—P i LLC
Mailing Address: t"D 50LV ' ATQipq 1�rL— • t Sq [i t ld
Gaazw � Nc- 2b7m3
Telephone Number:
Mail Address:
Buyer* / Other'
r
Date
* The Interested Buyer/Other acknowledges that an agreement and/or formal contract to purchase and/or conduct
due diligence activities exists between the current property owner and the signatory of this authorization in cases
where the property is not owned by the signatory.
Charlotte Office: www.wetiands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10. PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone]
[e-mail]

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
Kevin Vogul
LandDesign
223 North Graham Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
July 1, 2020
Expiration of Acceptance: January 1, 2021
Project: Project URP County: Mecklenburg
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8-di it HUC
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Yadkin
03040105
Warm Stream
300
Yadkin
03040105
Riparian Wetland
0.25
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Daniel Kuefler, agent
Sincerely,
&V_4iczt�
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
NCM �H C!•ii:�Ya� EQt
OCprprt�S of G.`sM RWIlrf
North Carolina Department of Errvironmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W. Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
Kevin Vogul
LandDesign
223 North Graham Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
Project: Project URP
County: Mecklenburg
401 permit#: 2020-0887
404 permit#: 2020-00946
DMS ID#: MR-07546
Amount Paid: $233,582.58
Check Number: pp530581186
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
RECEIPT
August 13, 2020
The NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) has received a check as indicated above as payment for the
compensatory mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification/Section 404 Permit(s) issued for
the above -referenced project. This receipt serves as notification that your compensatory mitigation
requirements assigned to DMS associated with the authorized activity as specified below have been satisfied.
You must also comply with all other conditions of this certification and any other state, federal or local
government permits or authorization associated with this activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
The DMS, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the Division is responsible for the
compensatory mitigation requirements indicated below associated with the project permit and agrees to
provide the compensatory mitigation as specified in the permit. Mitigation responsibility assigned to the DMS
is nontransferable. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument
dated July 28, 2010.
Mitigation Location
Mitigation Type
Credits
Yadkin 03040105
Warm Stream
418
Refunds of payments made to NCDMS are only approved under certain conditions. All refund requests must
be submitted in accordance with the Division's refund policy. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
At�dA�1�
FOR Tim Baumgartner
Director
cc: Todd Tugwell, USACE - Raleigh; Bryan Roden -Reynolds, USACE
Daniel Kuefler, agent
NORTH CAROLINAD
Department of Environmental Duali�
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W. Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

►0
Maps/Plans

may
e
_a
HIGHLAND
CREEK rogresslve
Preschool T
A
SITE
l�F�las
Clark's Creek
Greenway Playground
Y
GnvrrnN
Pal•A•Ro s Chlld
Development Center
60
C� um 4
7-ELEVEN 35548 4? 10.s�'
IJS Internal Concentrix
iv Revenue Service
ci
t z4»
G'
L
0.
0
o �o
r Sanitaire
� ax
C4a+sd�
r
xentiai - Charlotte
ata Center
QDavid Taylor
Corporate Center
David Tayrorpr
Centralin Council
om f Gov nents 4P `= 1VC r
Oy [:krr
cam`
Colonial Grand
at Legacy Park
ley Greenway
':
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
ComplianceLine Q
QC55 -Queen 9Tutor Time of Charlotte
STUDY LIMITS
:hard Creek
City STEM School
Corvian
Como
Elemenlci
.
a
Kids 'R' Kids Learning
g
Academy of Charlotte
W ilramfiicil ❑r
a
"' ¢�c Charlotte Observer v
,r
N
Chesterbrook
R
"Sy
I
Academy Preschool
All
Map data a 2090
Terms of Use Re or
rill
Prepared for:
University Research Park
Drawn By:
Reviewed By:
FIGURE 1
Wetlands and Frivironmental Planning
Group
Mecklenburg Co., NC
Leonard S. Rindper, PLLC.
Summit Ave URP, LLC
BLI<
DCI<
VICINITY MAP
02/23/20
0.90.-2277
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification

• G o�rerq�r �J.�Int_� � � �
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS PARCEL: 04741216
CENTENE MANAGEMENT
COMPANY LLC
7700 FORSYTH BLVD
SAINT LOUIS, MO 63105
° r +o rr III
DO
40 40
PARCEL:04741214
CENTENE MANAGEMENT
COMPANY LLC
7700 FORSYTH BLVD
9iojur x SAINT LOUIS, MO 63105 CL
PARCEL:04741212
PARCEL:04741215
�� CENTENE MANAGEMENT CENTENE MANAGEMENT
.� PARCEL: 04741213 COMPANY LLC
COMPANY LLC
7700 FORSYTH BLVD � e4
CENTENE MANAGEMENT 7700 FORSYTH BLVDti
COMPANY LLC
SAINT LOUIS, MO 63105 SAINT LOUIS, MO 63105
7700 FORSYTH BLVD
N SAINT LOUIS, MO 63105 1 Information Provided by
N ' Mecklenburg County GIS 2024
Prepared for: GOVERNOR HUNT RD Drawn By: Reviewed By: FIGURE 2
Summit Ave URP, LLC Mecklenburg Co., NC
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC. BLK KKS
len.rindner@wetian 7?4 PARCEL MAP 02/23/20
,.) 0 UPDATED KS
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification 02/15/2024

t
' 10C
it I. � T �.�rl'�•!1• y ,y�•'�Y �;µY � .�•
• i , �.� PROPERTY BOUNDARY y.
.Y s
f f STUDY LIMITS ! w
JW
_ y t
r
r ,x
r 71/ ep t" ,
" Google Earth Maps
Data Imagery 2020 • + + __ _ - I
Prepared for: University Research Park Drawn By: Reviewed By: FIGURE 2
Summit Ave URP, LLC Mecklenburg Co., NC BLK Dci<
AERIAL MAP 02/23/20
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification

-.7
W.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
f � STUDY LIMITS
_ J �•
AV
o
o
-� �-
rI r� ►�� MALLARD CREEK .
LOCATION
N Lat: 35.3276 N SCALE
Long:-80.7690 W 1:24,000 USGS QUAD "X ,
I HUC: 03040105 ACRES i Derita, NC +1 ` �•� F�� "
� ROCKY 80.86 � 1993 1+ led,
Image be subject to c
Prepared for: University Research Park Drawn By: Reviewed By: FIGURE 3
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Mecklenburg Co., NC
Leonard S. Rindper, PLLC. do Summit Ave URP, LLC BLK DCK
USGS MAP 02/23/20
' For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification

`l V
M o I.)
1 ti •T
..* W: wko
r •
'VV M L I
Celli 7
W
WkH C
Pat :U
w�
UE
E„o
M►�l
4f LIB
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
Ene WISE
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in ADI
Percent of ADI
10 50
EnB
Enon sandy loam. 2 to 8
95
percent slopes
End
Enon sandy loam. 8 to 15
56
6 1%
percent slopes
S u
MeB
Mecklenburg fine sandy loam,
7 3
2 to 8 percent slopes
Metz
Mecklenburg fine sandy loam,
95
10 40,
8 to 15 percent slopes
MO
Monacan loam, 0 to 2 percent
22.7
24 81!�
slopes. frequently flooded
PaE
Pacolet sandy loam. 15 to 25
02
0 2
percent slopes
WkE
Wilkes loam 15 to 25 percent
36.5
40 0°
slopes
100.0•
Totals for Area of Interest
91.3
1
1
- -N 1% 1% 1 -J—* A N - I &V If r01 I J
Prepared for: University Research Park
Summit Ave URP, LLC Mecklenburg Co., NC
SOIL SURVEY MANUSCRIPT MAP
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
„eI
v
TO xt Mfg
w 6+4
NRCS Soil Survey Manuscript 11
�.� Mecklenburg County (1980)
LI I
Drawn By: Reviewed By: FIGURE 4
BLK DCK
02/23/20

is •�''� �' `= _.° PROPERTYBOUNDARY ��! 4 *** USACE Verification 6/10/2020 ***
v� J . ,' - STUDY LIMITS 4
ti k r=`t< 'f 80.86 AC +/
vR ~
PERENNIAL + WETLAND II
% INTERMITTENT
- - STREAM F STREAM I 0.013 ac
'. i:::;:• INTERMITTENT 1,737 If tt.
•��';•�:�- ,� �i �Nlifffl'��r5. •.• _ .�h�:=.: _ ij�rr ,, •ti - 139 If � -
''}' : if STREAM C -
��NCDEQ . f ~ •�� - 486 If ,.
STREAM NCDEQ
FORM A STREAM k �y
FORM C 5
INTERMITTENT
PERENNIAL 7'.7
STREAM A USAGE 4'��� STREAM G
1 • ;ll [[ L1.==, USAGE
WETLAND � III 4 yl �r i . z
FORM D
INTERMITTENT 'a.�` j �_„-
L'4 L
STREAM B
48 If
WETLAND D
0.29 ac
WETLAND H
0.03 ac
J WETLAND E
- LEG-=idC'
MALLARD CREEK '•� `� � ,..�-:r,
.mow..
Project boundary study limits -0.014 ac
Legend
--
2,4751f Stream "T
� -
CMProjectEla.nil YJeiian dery .. O 175 350 l'- ;
2RCantours
Landscape photo direction r
J, Feet
Prepared for: University Research Park Drawn By: Reviewed By: FIGURE 26
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Mecklenburg Co., NC NRN DCI<
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC. Summit Avenue
URP, LLC DELINEATION MAP 2/23/20
r For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification

INSET - SEE SHEET 11
• PROPOSED CENTRAL PROJECT COURTYARD (NWP 39)
•• 152 LF OF PERMANENT IMPACT
O�m� i �__- -•�- 7� \ p� \ TRAINING CENTER
!i� K '•\\ tiT INTERMITTENT STREAM C (486')
A
DECK O OFFICE ----
��—
� OFFICE
PERENNIAL STREAM A (1,795 LF) A I ',1 OFFICE BAD 3 �A BMP 4 C
OFFICE
1 )(, t BMP 2
INTERNAL CIRCULATION \Y6
EMERGENCY SERVICES ROAD
BOTTOMLESS CULVERT CROSSING
INTERMITTENT STREAM B (48')s�
-`A'� �x:A,!.a < �) WETLAND D(0.291 AC)
MALLARD CREEK
DATA CENTER
INTERNAL CIRCULATION/
EMERGENCY SERVICES ROAD
1 /
i \
V9
INTERMITTENT STREAM 1 (139') I
- WETLAND 11 (0.013 AC) j• j
S
PERENNIAL STREAM•F (1,737 LF) I
I
DECK / - ----
1 INSET- SEE SHEET 12
PROPOSED FILUDAYCARE PLAY AREA (NWP 39)
\ DAYCARE I " 81 LF OF PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTED
DECK 0.03 AC OF PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTED
INTERMITTENT STREAM G (81')
r
,! I��
vBMP 1 I?, jd� i �j I WETLAND 1 (0.030 AC)
LVERT CROSSING
Imo— STREAM BUFFER (TYP)
WETLAND E (0.014 AC)
LEGEND:
WETLANDS
(0.347 AC TOTALS)
(0.030 AC OF PERMANENT IMPACTS)
STREAM CENTERLINE
(4,286 LF TOTAL)
(233 LF OF PERMANENT IMPACTS)
SCALE: 1 "=350'
0 175' 350'
PROJECT URP • CHARLOTTE, NC • OVERALL SITE PLAN (SHEET 10 OF 18)
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC
7/2320204.45PM VCHEREDNICHENKO\\CHFILES\PR0JECTS\_2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369 WETLANDS EXHI BIT —2020630DWG

_ EXIST. TREES TO REMAIN
AS PART OF VEGETATED
SECURITY BUFFER /// / }/ f / / / I I I ! I I � I_ -
I\ GOVERNOR HUNT RD. I f III
lI
am-`
f
✓ _ _ A l
`INTERMITTENT STREAM C (486')
I EXIST. STREAM TO REMAIN
VA1 VA\l���vv UNDISTURBED ii /ram 111/-
CONTRACTOR SHALL
!�_ _ LIMIT ALL TEMP. IMPACTS TO
! I I I I I 1 )'ll \ \ / I / ��� , ; t ' �� WATERS OF THE US TO LESS
V 50' STREAM BUFFER (TYP) THAN 90 DAYS
\�\� `_ 7' � \ 6G t1BLJC RIGHT OF ;' , ,/ _/OFFICE 5' TEMP. STREAM t / �� __ = l (\ / J
IMPACT FOR WALL
CONSTRUCTION
CANTILEVER
NOTE: BMP 3 & BM
P 4 v��v OVERLOOK, NO
SHALL NOT ENCROACH
�-
1I I/ �/I � \1S�TREAM IMPACT
EXISTING JURISDICTIONAL oNp
OFFICE
r
LIMITS OF INTERMITTENT / / 1 > / T �/� � �- • �Xf
STREAM �\I I IIf Ill i / I I/ 11/ I 1`_
\
PROP. PUMP
l� ` / I � t `1 1 \ INLET LOCATION
/lI IIII l 11/� / I / V FOR TEMP.
l 1 r l / / /) / y / �j I / I I \ \ DEWATERING \ y \\ \ �, /
I / c/ I 1 \ \� \ \ _- - /1
�i o ( / I / Ill /
�y PROP. COFFER DAM (20 LF 1 \ __ y /
OF TEMP. STREAM IMPACT) �\ �� ��.,ears V` 1 %//�i__�� -� IAIAA✓�l/
PROP. RETAINING
WALL (TYP)
/ INV. IN- 620.32
`�„>� , , ✓m ��\\ \ � o� \\\\�.�\�\\i��\��� - \��—� \ �_5`_'�'// /Ill(/I /\•/ -
BMP3\ \\\�\ �� PROP.
OFFICE / \ \ \\\ ► Q= \�
1 \ 1 1 g� JUNCTION BOX
PROP. 129' OF 72" I ��, �� \ \� INV. OUT: 618.62
Utg CULVERT (BURIED 1')
zo
16' L X12' X6' H CON/SPAN - - - - -
() (\M ( ) AMENITY \
I -SERIES CULVERT WITH WATER OFFICE
ENERGY DISSIPATION MEMBERS BODY -
Rlao " PROP. RETAINING
WALL (TYP)
) \
5'TEMP. STREAM F 30'x7 OTTOML �
I WALL I CULVERT F
PACT FOR WA
CONSTRUCTION
PROP. FIRE & ���� - _ — i/
DOMESTIC WATER -��i -- _ — _ - EXIST. STREAM IN F OODPLAIN +' ::t'''} INTERNAL CIRCULATION /
/ I EMERGENCY S
DISTRIBUTION — -- _ _ _--_----__- ,::.::>* "::k> 10'TEMP.STREAM
/ ROAD s
TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED + +:.,�+E}°.° +:.;::;}::r
+'+}'' >?:`: ... ...:>::k:�:��';3 IMPACT FOR WALL
> . k: CONSTRUCTION �
PROP. RETAINING
WALL (TYP)
T`FLOODPLAIN
;
'OD' Posy CONSrRUcnom eurr6re
�- - EXIST. WETLAND TO I ` SCALE: 1"=80'
REMAIN UNDISTURBED
_ _ 1 SS—
UNPAVm
40' ,,80'
PROJECT URP - CHARLOTTE, NC - INTERMITTENT STREAM C - IMPACT AREA BUFFER EXHIBIT (SHEET 11 OF 18)
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC LandDesign.
7/23/2020 4:45 PM VCHEREDNICHENKO \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-2020-6-30.DWG

\ 0 \ \
DAVID TAYLOR DR
_ C6 i 1/2"EIR
jl� �IIIII� VAAA
iv
l \ \ EXISTING
SANITARY SEWER —
I; O/
NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL
1(_ LIMIT ALL TEMP. IMPACTS TO
L :> // 1 \ WATERS OF THE US TO LESS
\ I I �• BORE UNDER EX. I ` �' w \ \ THEN 90 DAYS
I 1 i1I1 I11 /I Ill' STREAM—i / I I /
l NO STREAM IMPACT 1111 \ \ r . Z \
SANITARY SEWER \ III EX. SANITA
\\
\ \ \ I SEWER MANHOLE \ w /
I SERVICE TO DECK \ 1 I I I I � \ - \ \ Iw I� I \ �
I I I I II\y\�•��•�,�I �� I III \ _--_—__—,
\_--------
SANITARY SEWER \ 0 I \ \
SERVICE TO DAYCARE DAYCARE—
\,II`I 642.60 \ C)
EXIST. FLOODPLAIN
PROP. FILL TO PROVIDE OUTDOOR
PLAY AREA FOR DAYCARE 81 LF OF \ \
PROP. FIRE & w
J I PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT F- \ _ PROJECT BOUNDARY (TYP)
DOMESTIC WATER \ � � 2 _
50' STREAM BUFFER (TYP) / III I I I ( I / - I \ \\ �\ / DISTRIBUTION
OUTDOOR PLAY AREA
\ \ ELEV: 642.00
` III IN E MI EXISTING
641.50 TW \ _ / I I I III INTERMITTENT STREAM G
618:00BW
y 642.27 Tw . ��\ //� \ I
-- �� (` �J �� —I �/ I \ VAA�A\\vvv/ / �// ://� 1/ /
sls.00 Bw / — �/
\I I9 N PROP. RETAINING WALL
\ I \PROPOSED\� \� WI\H S\ETY FENCE
SANITARY SEWER
RELOCATION�r—
\
I 6�.00TW
1V \ `620.00 BW _— — \ / �' III L // //L
40'X 10'CONSPAN
�{ BOTTOMLESS CULVERT - - L — I \ \ \ — / \ �\ \ — //
EXISTING WETLAND TO ,\ AVA
BE IMPACTED (0.03 AC) — \ \ / \-SOALE!i"=50' WIRED
\ / 1� \\--- oP 29
!� � \ . _ ` T_ -25' 50'
PROJECT URP • CHARLOTTE, NC • INTERMITTENT STREAM G - IMPACT AREA BUFFER EXHIBIT (SHEET 12 OF 18) L�I1Qe
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC e
7/2320204. 45 PAI VCHEREDN I CHEN KO\\CHFILES\PROJECTS_2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369 WETLANDS EXH I BIT -2020630 DWG

/ a DOMESTIC/FIRE
�A
�-^ -� WATER SERVICE
Nx \ \ \ I CONNECTION TO EX.
�� � � \ �\ PUBLIC WATER MAIN
TRAINING
FACILITY
DECK - -- -
=/
SANITARY SEWER
SERVICE FROM EX.
PUBLIC SEWER _-�" \i A
COLLECTION
\\ `A \ DECK m BMP 3 i BMP 4
DOMESTIC & FIRE \ i �� I OFFICE
WATER LINE
Sg
BMP OUTFALL BMP 2 MECHANICAL YARD
DOMESTIC
WATER LINE \ I .\\ \ �� •i* — - _-- - - _ ---
��__
- DOMESTIC &FIRE --'-
EXISTING:Ae SANITARY SEWER I / WATER
ATER LINE
__ _ --
--
CON/SPAN' I (
BOTTOMLESS �
I I 14 ' �'--
ARCH PIPE
SANITARY SEWER
SERVICE FROM EX.
PUBLIC SEWER EXISTING \
COLLECTION SANITARY SEWER
fit
SANITARY SEWER
SERVICE FROM EX.
PUBLIC SEWER
COLLECTION
BMP 5 1 t \ j b y1 I
SCALE: V=200'
BMP OUTFALL
I
PROJECT URP - CHARLOTTE, NC - OVERALL WATER AND SEWER PLAN (SHEET 13 OF 18)
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC LandDesign.
7/23/2020 4:45 PM VCHEREDNICHENKO \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-2020-6-30.DWG

OFF�C�
�a°� �__-------
BMP
III
FALL
OFFICE
III
$ 4�
BMP OUTFALL J_
WA
\
11
�k
mg� �
I 1
BORE UNDER EX. I I
STREAM \ I I
NO STREAM IMPACT \ \
UTILITY
YARD l
DOMESTIC & FIRE s _ _ �_ _�— *�� \ \ \ �- ./ I
WATER LINE -
BMP 1
I
SANITARY SEWER
SERVICE FROM EX.
PUBLIC SEWER,
COLLECTION \\ �� \ �� �� BMP OUTFALL
/
/
SANITARY SEWER
SERVICE FROM EX. /
PUBLIC SEWER
COLLECTION
/
Tq /
\\ / 11
) � ' \\-- DOMESTIC/FIRE
WATER SERVICE
CONNECTION TO EX.
\ \ \ I PUBLIC WATER MAIN
DAYCARE
I I
INS9NrEs
I I DOMESTIC & FIRE '
WATER LINE
I '
CON/SPAN I
III I BOTTOMLESS I I
I I ARCH PIPE
I
Ifi' ' I ' SCALE: 1"=150'
1 I xl
\ I 0 75' 150'
I
PROJECT URP • CHARLOTTE, NC • OVERALL WATER AND SEWER PLAN (SHEET 14 OF 18)
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC Lan®
7/23/2020 4:45 PM VCHEREDNICHENKO \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-2020-6-30.DWG

CONTECH I -SERIES
30'W X 7'H BOTTOMLESS CULVERT SECTION VIEW - STA
SECTION VIEW - STA 0+34 650
635 635
PROP. GRADE @
L] ROAD 645
CENTERLINE
630 630
PROP. GRADE
PROP. FIRE & DOMESTIC
PROP. 30'W X 7'H WATER DISTRIBUTION
BOTTOMLESS CULVERT 640
625 625
EX. GRADE AT STREAM PROPOSED 12" RCP
CENTERLINE STORM PIPE
635
620 620
EXIST. GRADE
630
615 615
PROP. FOOTINGS
(DESIGN AND PROP. 12'(W) X 16'(L) X 6'(H)
DETAILS BY CONTECH I -SERIES CULVERT
OTHERS)
625
610 610
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30
620
PROP. ENERGY DISSIPATION
MEMBER THROUGHOUT THE EXIST. GRADE
LENGTH OF THE CULVERT. NO
SUBGRADE SHALL BE EXPOSED
615
SCALE: 1"=5' V SCALE: 1"=20' H
61030 -20 -10 0 10
0 2.5' 5' 0 10, 20'
72"
650 650
645 645
640 640
635 635
630 630
625 625
620 620
615 615
61030
1+50
650
645
640
635
630
625
620
EXIST. GRADE
615
20 3010
CULVERT
0+93
RCP SECTION VIEW
-STA
PROP.GRADE
PROP. 72" RCP
/
r
20
3010
-20 -10 0 10
PROJECT URP - CHARLOTTE, NC - INTERMITTENT STREAM C - CROSS SECTION (SHEET 16 OF 18)
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC LandDesign.7/21/20203:42PM MTAYLOR N:\2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-72 IN CROSS SECTIONS.DWG

i
•.:i•:.
OFFICE
•■• •••
t�
FL
BMP OUTFALL j
41
l
lk z
�o
�Q
z
BMP 4
� h =
O
O
BMP OUTFALL
60'`P T OF WAY
--------
----------------
° q OFFICE
F-_________
__
____________
� FL -
L
SS -v . FL
PROJECT URP • CHARLOTTE, NC • OVERALL WATER AND SEWER PLAN (SHEET 17 OF 18)
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC
7/23/2020 4:45 PM VCHEREDNICHENKO \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\ 2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-2020-6-30.DWG
SCALE: 1 "=60'
0 30'
• �-

OFFICE
TREE SAVE:
31.75 ACRES
INTERNAL CIRCULATION
-EMERGENCY SERVICES ROAD
pol
DATA CENTER
1—
BMP 5
i/
�JI
I,
SECTION 21-94 - TREE SAVE AREA PHASE I
OVERALL SITE ACREAGE: +/- 80.86 AC
ON -SITE TREE SAVE REQUIRED: +/- 12.1 AC (15%)
ON -SITE TREE SAVE PROVIDED: +/- 43.72 AC (54%)
LEGEND
TREE SAVE AREA
<
O
TREE SAVE:
0.26 ACRES
TREE SAVE: TREE SAVE:
''
1.45 ACRES �, 5.60 ACRES
OFFICE
BMP4
r � s
MALLARD CREEK """►"
INTERNAL CIRCULATION /
EMERGENCY SERVICES ROAD
DECK
DAYCARE
OFFICE If' I DECK
BMP1
i
MEMO
EASEMENT (TYp)
�i
'P.
TREE SAVE:
31.75 ACRES
STREAM BUFFER (TYP)
�i
SCALE: 1 "=350'
0 175' 350'
PROJECT URP • CHARLOTTE, NC • OVERALL TREE SAVE PLAN (SHEET 18 OF 18)
PN1018369 1 06.30.2020 1 SUMMIT AVENUE URP, LLC LandDesign.7/17/2020 4:31 PM AELIASON \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\2018\1018369\CAD\EXHIBITS\WETLANDS\1018369-WETLANDS EXHIBIT-2020-6-30TREE SAVE.DWG

Threatened & Endangered Species
Report

WEPG
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species
Evaluation
C.nar-IULte ❑ff Ce.
10612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
I en. ri nd ner@wet Ian ds -epg. ca m
For: Governor Hunt Road Site
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
By: Lisa R. Gaffney
July 2, 2020
www. wetlands-epg.co m
Asheville Office-.
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10. PMB 283
Asheville, NC 28805

Governor Hunt Road Site - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
GENERAL LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION:
The Governor Hunt Road Site (+/- 80.86 acres) is located just south of Governor
Hunt Road and David Taylor Drive, and just north of Mallard Creek in
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. It can be found on the Derita NC USGS
Topographic Quadrangle Map; latitude is 35.3276 N, longitude is-80.7690 W.
The topography is gently to moderately sloped. The elevation ranges from 600
to 730 ft. (Figure 1). The site is covered with successional mixed pine and
hardwood forest, with slopes and drainages flowing into Mallard Creek which
forms the southern site boundary.
Figure 1:
PROPERTY BOUNDARY L /"'ti z� f`^
�✓ - STUDY LIMfTS
45 1 LL
AP 4 v � ✓ � y� � �` "� v�1�
-
r MALLARD CR E ER
Y . LOCATION
F ► Lat: 35,32 /6 N SCALE
N Lang:-80.7890 W 1:24,000
HUC:03040105 ACRES USGS[1UAE7
r y� tk IiOCICY 80.86 y Oerita, NC
1 III f
WEPGPrepared for: GOVERNOR HUNT Rb Drawn 04 Reviewed By: "SURE 1
Mecklen burg Co., NC
ELK
USGS MAR 02?231za
For study purposes only • Subkcr to USAC£/NC 0F4 very-i tran
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Governor Hunt Road Site - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
METHODOLOGY:
The US Fish and Wildlife Service website
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/nc counties.html was referenced to
determine the occurrence of Threatened, Endangered and Protected species for
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, the results of which are listed below (Table
1). Maps and aerial photographs were assembled, and the site was investigated
during the weeks of March 16 and April 6, 2020; and July 1, 2020.
Table 1: Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species listed for
Mecklenburg County
County: Mecklenburg, NC
*Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
**Data search on March 16, 2020
Group Name Status Record Status
Invertebrate
Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona
Endangered
Current
decorata
Invertebrate
Rusty -patched Bumble Bee
Endangered
Historic
(Bombus affinis)
Vascular Plants
Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea
Endangered
Current
laevi ata
Vascular Plants
Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus
Endangered
Current
schweinitzii)
Vascular Plants
Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii)
Endangered
Current
Vertebrate
Northern Long -Eared Bat (Myotis
Threatened
Probable/Potential
sententrionalis)
Vertebrate
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus
Protected under the Bald
Current
leucocephalus)
and Golden Eagle
Protection Act
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Governor Hunt Road Site - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
SPECIES DESCRIPTIONS:
Three plant species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in
Mecklenburg County:
• Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), listed as Federally Endangered,
is typically found in open habitats which historically have been maintained by
wildfires and grazing bison and elk herds. Now most occurrences are limited to
roadsides, woodland and field edges, and utility rights -of -way (ROW).
• Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata), listed as Federally Endangered, is
typically found in open woods, cedar barrens, roadsides, clear cuts, dry
limestone bluffs and power line rights -of -way, requiring abundant sunlight and
little competition from other plant species.
• Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii), listed as Federally Endangered, requires
habitat of sandy forests and woodland edges. This species requires periodic fire
as a part of its ecology.
Four animal species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in
Mecklenburg County:
• Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act, typically inhabits forested areas near large bodies of open water
such as lakes, marshes, seacoasts and rivers, where there are suitable fish
populations and tall trees for nesting and roosting.
• Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), listed as Federally Endangered, is
restricted to cool, clean, well -oxygenated water. Stable, silt- free stream beds
are required for this species. Typically stable areas occur where the stream
banks are well -vegetated with trees and shrubs.
Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis), listed as Federally Threatened.
During summer, northern long-eared bats roost singly or in colonies underneath
bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees. Males and non -
reproductive females may also roost in cooler places, like caves and mines. It
has also been found, rarely, roosting in structures like barns and sheds. Northern
long-eared bats spend winter hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula.
Rusty -patched Bumble Bee (Bombus affinis), listed as Federally Endangered,
live in colonies that include a single queen and female workers. Rusty -patched
Bumble Bees historically occupied grasslands and tallgrass prairies. Bumble
bees need areas that provide nectar and pollen from flowers, nesting sites
(underground and abandoned rodent cavities or clumps of grasses), and
overwintering sites for hibernating queens (undisturbed soil).
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Governor Hunt Road Site - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
RESULTS:
The site is part of University Research Park, a commercial business park
development. It is covered with successional mixed pine and hardwood forest,
with slopes and drainages flowing into Mallard Creek which forms the southern
site boundary. There are maintained walking trails on site that tie into the
greenway trail along Mallard Creek. The roadsides along Governor Hunt Road
and David Taylor Drive are planted in Fescue turf grass (Festuca sp.) and
cultivated Red Maple trees (Acer rubrum).
The disturbed mixed hardwoods forest on the slopes and drainages has an
average diameter at breast height (dbh) of 12 inches, with some larger trees up
to 30 inches dbh present. The upper slopes approximate a Basic Oak -Hickory
Forest community type, grading into Piedmont/Low Mountain Alluvial
Forest in the bottomlands along the streams. The canopy is composed of
Shortleaf Pine (P. echinata), White Oak (Quercus alba), Post Oak (Q. stellata),
Red Oak (Q. rubra), Southern Red Oak (Q. falcata), Willow Oak (Q. phellos),
Pignut Hickory (Carya glabra), Shagbark Hickory (C. ovata), Sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua), Yellow Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), Hackberry
(Celtis laevigata), Black Walnut (Juglans nigra), American Elm (Ulmus
americans), and White Ash (Fraxinus americans). The subcanopy is composed
of Flowering Dogwood (Corpus florida), American Holly (Ilex opaca), Mulberry
(Morus rubra), Winged Elm (Ulmus alata), Hawthorn (Crataegus sp.), Black
Cherry (Prunus serotina), Eastern Red Cedar, and Black Gum (Nyssa sylvatica).
The shrub layer includes Black Haw (Viburnum prunifolium), and Pinxter Azalea
(Rhododendron nudiflorum), Heart's-a-burtstin (Euonymus americanus),
Sweetshrub (Calycanthus floridus), Blueberry (Vaccinium spp.), Chinese Privet
(Ligustrum sinense), and Russian Olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia). Vines present
are Japanese Honeysuckle, Virginia Creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia),
Muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), Mikania scandens (Climbing Hempvine), Catbrier
(Smilax spp.), and Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans). The herb layer includes
Heartleaf Ginger (Hexastylis arifolia), Christmas Fern (Polystichum
acrostichoides), Ebony Spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron), Spotted
Wintergreen (Chimaphila maculata), American alumroot (Heuchera americans),
Running Pine (Lycopodium flabelliforme), Downy Rattlesnake Plantain
(Goodyera pubescens), Curlyheads (Clematis ochroleuca), Beardtongue
(Penstemon sp.), Solomon's Seal (Polygonatum biflorum) and Japanese Stilt
Grass (Microstegium vimineum).
The assemblage of plants growing in the transitional areas around the trail and
woods edges are Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), Broomsedge
(Andropogon virginicus), Johnson Grass (Sorghum halepense), Splitbeard (A.
ternarius), Beggars Ticks (Desmodium sp.), Thoroughwort (Eupatorium sp.), St.
John's Wort (Hypericum punctatum), Goldenrod (Solidago spp.), and Henbit
(Lamium amplexicaule).
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Governor Hunt Road Site - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Threatened & Endangered/Protected Species Results
• All potential habitats for Schweinitz's Sunflower, Michaux's Sumac and
Smooth Coneflower along the roadsides, transitional areas and woods
edges were examined and none of these species were present.
• No habitat exists on the site for Bald Eagles, and there were no sightings
nor were any nesting sites observed.
• There is no habitat on site for the Carolina Heelsplitter. Based on existing
documentation, Carolina Heelsplitter populations have not been previously
identified within this basin. No individuals were observed during the survey
nor would any be expected on -site.
• Comparing this site location to the USFWS Asheville office's website
(http://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project review/NLEB in WNC.html) it
appears that the site meets the "exempt" criteria which requires no further
action under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for the Northern
Long-eared Bat.
• Comparing this site location to the USFWS Range Map for Rusty -patched
Bumble Bee
(https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/insects/rpbb/rpbbmap.htmi)
Mecklenburg County is in its Historic Range, and as such, Section 7
consultation is not needed. WEPG concludes that Rusty -patched Bumble
Bee is not present.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the site investigation and the review of available data, WEPG did not
identify any protected species occurring on the subject property. No further
investigation of the presence of protected species on this site is recommended at
this time.
Respectfully submitted,
044z, # 1*e5�1
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist
July 1, 2020
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Governor Hunt Road Site - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Curriculum Vitae for:
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist / Botanist
B.S. Biology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Ms. Gaffney is a classically trained botanist and natural resource biologist and
has conducted field work and investigative studies covering thousands of
cumulative acres in both North and South Carolina since 1996, including:
• Cabarrus County NC Natural Heritage Inventory. Organized, directed,
and conducted field survey of natural areas in Cabarrus County for the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Lincoln County NC Natural Heritage Inventory. Organized, directed, and
conducted field survey of natural areas in Lincoln County for the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Threatened and Endangered Species Surveys and Natural Communities
Evaluation for over 50,000 acres in North and South Carolina, 1996 -
present.
• Located and identified numerous previously unreported populations of
Federally Endangered Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii).
• Located and identified numerous previously unreported populations of
Threatened Dwarf Heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora).
• Found Schweinitz's Sunflower at Redlair Farm in Gaston County, NC.
This discovery led (in part) to the purchase of the site by the State of North
Carolina Plant Conservation Program, now called Redlair Preserve. This
population has become a Recovery Site for the species.
• Participated in numerous Piedmont Prairie restoration projects in
Mecklenburg, Union, Cabarrus and Gaston Counties, North Carolina.
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

N
N
U
i
O
Ln
oC
c�
U
Cultural
Resources
Report

R.S. Webb & Associates
Cultural Resource Management Consultants
2800 Holly Springs Parkway, Suite 200 - P.O. Drawer 1319
Holly Springs, Georgia 30142
Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
April 8, 2020
Mr. Daniel Kuefler
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, North Carolina 28105
Subject: Findings - Cultural Resources Literature Search
University Research Park Development Tract
Charlotte-Derita, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
R.S. Webb & Associates Project No. 20-649-123
Dear Mr. Kuefler:
BACKGROUND
During March 2020, R.S. Webb & Associates conducted a desk -top cultural resources literature
review for the proposed University Research Park development tract near Derita, Mecklenburg
County, North Carolina. The review was conducted to identify previously recorded cultural
resources located within or near the project area. A "cultural resource" is defined as a discrete area
of human activity that is more than 50 years old. The study tract is located on the north side of
Mallard Creek, east of Mallard Creek Road in northeast -central Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina. The project area is on the USGS Derita, North Carolina 7.5-minute quadrangle map
(Figure 1).
METHODOLOGY
Literature and Records Search: Through the State Historic Preservation Office's (SHPO) HPOWeb
database, information regarding National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) properties,
Mecklenburg County historic structures, and other surveyed, studied, and/or determined -eligible
historic resources was reviewed and collected. Historic county maps were viewed online through
North Carolina Maps, a collaboration of the University of North Carolina, the State Archives of
North Carolina, and the Outer Banks History Center. Historic aerial photography and additional
historic maps were accessed through Historicaerials.com, Earthexplorer.usgs.gov,
Legacy.lib.utexas.edu/maps/and Alabamamaps. ua.edu.
Note: The North Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA) was closed to the public and to
consultants on March 17, 2020 due to the COVID 19 emergency. Therefore, research regarding the
presence or absence of recorded archeological sites in or near the study area was performed
through electronic communication with OSA personnel.
The following primary sources were found to be useful in searching for historic resources within and
adjacent to the project area:
• 1910 USDA Soil Map of Mecklenburg County
• 1911 County Commissioner's Map of Mecklenburg County

Findings - Cultural Resources Literature Search, University Research Park Development Tract Page 2
April 8, 2020
• 1912 Rural Delivery Map of Mecklenburg County
• 1930, 1936, 1938, 1953, 1968, 1972, and 1980 State Highway and Public Works
Commission Map of Mecklenburg County
• 1983 and 1986 Charlotte -Mecklenburg Metropolitan Planning Organization -
Thoroughfare Plan Maps of Mecklenburg County
• 1948 USGS Derita, North Carolina 7.5 Quadrangle Map
• 1956 and 1968 aerial photographs of Mecklenburg County
• Google Earth Aerial imagery, 1993-Present
RESULTS
Previous Cultural Resources Investigations: According to maps provided by the OSA, there have
been at least seven previously planned and/or preformed cultural resources investigation projects
conducted within 1.0 mile of the current project tract. Two of these projects, ER18-0707 and ER
19-0835, were planned and/or performed within 1,000 feet of the current project area but do not
overlap with it (Figure 1).
National Register of Historic Places: There are no NRHP-listed historic properties located within
1.0 mile of the project area.
State Study List Properties and Properties Determined -Eligible for the NRHP: No State Study List
sites or Determined -Eligible properties are located within 1.0 mile of the study tract.
Mecklenburg County Historic Resources: The HPOWeb on-line database indicates that there are four
surveyed -only historic resources located within 1.0 mile of the project tract. These resources were
identified either by survey (1990) or by other types cultural resources identification projects (e.g.,
road or bridge improvement studies), but they have not been assessed for historic integrity or NRHP-
eligibility. The closest of these properties, Resource MK-3260 (aka Bridge No. 83), is located
approximately 780 feet west of the project area (Figure 1). Google Earth imagery indicates that the
associated roadway (Mallard Creek Road) was widened, and that the historic bridge was either
replaced, heavily modified and/or it was encapsulated within a replacement structure between
January 1993 and March 1998.
OSA-Recognized Archeological Sites: According to OSA personnel, there are 10 recorded
archeological sites located within 1.0 mile of the project tract. The closest site, 31MK11, is a
prehistoric lithic scatter located approximately 600 feet west of the project area; the site has not been
assessed for NRHP-eligibility (Figure 1).
Historic Cemeteries: Historic maps and aerial photographs show no cemeteries located within or
adjacent to the project area.
Revolutionary War Actions/Features: After capturing Savannah, Georgia (December 1778) and
Charleston, South Carolina (May 1780), Sir Henry Clinton returned to New York and left Charles
(Lord Cornwallis) and just more than 8,000 troops to conquer North Carolina. Following victory
at Camden, South Carolina, the British aimed to occupy Charlotte and to restore the Royal
government there. However, resistence to Cornwallis' movement was substantial, and it took his
army 17 days to march the 70 miles from Camden to Charlotte. Upon Cornwallis' arrival at

Findings - Cultural Resources Literature Search, University Research Park Development Tract Page 3
April 8, 2020
Charlotte on October 3,1780, the rebels constantly harassed his foraging parties, captured his scouts,
and captured or killed his messengers. As a result, it took nearly a week for Cornwallis to learn of
the defeat of his left wing at King's Mountain. Following a series of small skirmishes around
Charlotte (though none were located near the project area), Corwallis abandoned this first attempt
to subdue North Carolina, calling the vicinity a "hornet's nest" of rebellion. Cornwallis retreated
south to Winnsborough, South Carolina and made a second attempt at North Carolina the following
campaign season (1781); this time he bypassed the Charlotte/Mecklenburg County area to the west
and north (Powell 1989, Lewis 2011).
Civil War Actions/Features: Review of the Official Military Atlas of the Civil War (Davis et al.
1983) revealed that no significant Civil War military activity occurred in present Mecklenburg
County, North Carolina. Union General William T. Sherman, following the capture of Columbia,
South Carolina on February 17, 1865, moved north to the vicinity of Lancaster County, South
Carolina, but his army then turned northeast and moved toward Laurel Hill and Fayetteville, North
Carolina, thus bypassing the project region to the south and east (Davis et al. 1983).
Structures on Historic Maps and Aerial Photographs: Maps of Mecklenburg County produced
during the period 1910-1912 show Mallard Creek Church Road well to the north and the meandering
(since straightened) course of Mallard Creek Road just west of the project tract. Secondary roads,
with structures along their courses, passed northeast and southwest of the project area (Figure 1).
State highway or Road Commission maps produced during the period 1930-1938 indicate evolution
in the course of Mallard Creek Road with the current route assumed by the latter date. None of these
maps, however, show additional roads or structures located in or near the study tract. The 1948
Derita quadrangle map shows (Figure 1): Island Park Circle, a historic segment of Mallard Creek
Road located 250 feet east of the study area; Alexander Road, a remnant of a historic through road
located 600 feet north of the of the study area; and what may have been Lagrange Road, a remnant
of an historic though road located 2,000 feet east of the study area. Structures were depicted along
the east of project side of former route and at the terminal ends of the latter two roads. Highway
maps produced during the period 1953-1980 also show roads approaching the study area from the
north, west, and east, but the maps depict no structures.
The 1988 Charlotte -Mecklenburg Thoroughfare Plan map shows the Governor Hunt Road/David
Taylor Drive courses that form the north study area boundary (these routes did not appear on a 1983
verison of the same map). The 2019 Derita, North Carolina quadrangle map shows the Mallard
Creek Greenway passing along the south study area boundary (Figure 1) ; this feature also appears
on aerial photographs from 1993.
Aerial photographs taken in 1956 show the altered course of Mallard Creek Road and the remaining
arched section of roadway (now Island Park Circle) located west of the project area with structures
along its course. The project tract was almost entirely wooded in 1956, with the more heavily
vegetated areas located in the northeast and west parts of the tract. Land still in cultivation, centered
on a house located at the south end of Alexander Road, extended to near the north project area
boundary; cultivated land was located near the creek in and near the east part of the study tract. No
structures or other features appeared in or near the project area in 1956. Aerial photographs from
1968 show no change other than the further maturation of above -described wooded areas.

Findings - Cultural Resources Literature Search, University Research Park Development Tract Page 4
April 8, 2020
CONCLUSIONS
There are no NRHP-listed properties, known archeological sites or recorded historic resources
located within or near the project tract. A historic bridge site and an unassessed archeological site
lie 600 feet and more west of the study area. Historic maps and aerial photographs indicate no
human occupation and some agricultural use of the study area during the 20' century.
CLOSING COMMENTS
Mr. Rindner, we appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have any
questions or comments, please contact me at 770-345-0706.
Sincerely,
R.S. WEBB & ASSOCIATES
qJ.B Robert S. (Steve) Webb
President and Senior Principal Archeologist
Attachments: Figure 1
REFERENCES
Davis, G.B., L.J. Perry and J.W. Kirkley, compiled by C.D. Cowles
1983 Atlas to Accompany the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies.
Reprint of the 1891-1895 edition. The Fairfax Press, New York.
Lewis, J.D.
2013 "The Known Battles & Skirmishes in South Carolina." The American Revolution in
South Carolina. Internet -Online. Found at: http://www.carolana.com/SC/
Revolution/. Accessed November 17, 2019.
Powell, W.S.
1989 North Carolina Through Four Centuries. University of North Carolina Press,
Chapel Hill and London.

R 1 -0707 a
f Alexander Road 700
T`1 o
_q •
Q •
ER 19-0835
n'RN ❑
13
•�`y� Project Area
Resource �0�
- MK3260� ❑ _ Lagrange.
(Bridge No..83) ❑ Road/Carnegie
Boulevard
<31MK11
■
Island CiMck
Circle
Mallard Creek �y
13
r
a Greenway----------+ �o
❑ Structure on Historic Maps Previous Cultural Resource Project
O Recorded Archeological Site "" Road on Historic Maps
Map Reference: 7.5-Minute USGS Quadrangle Scale
Derita (2019), NC 0 305 meters
0 1000 feet
Figure 1 Project Area and Cultural Resources Location Map

El
Approvals /
Authorizations

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANI£L SMITH
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
August 3, 2020
DWR# 20-0887
Mecklenburg County
Mr. Matthew Browder
Summit Avenue URP, LLP
1440 South Tryon Str., Ste. 104
Charlotte, NC 29203
Subject: APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Project URP
Dear Mr. Browder:
You have our approval, in accordance with the General Certification and those conditions listed below,
for the purpose proposed in your application dated and received by the Division of Water Resources (the
Division) on July 7, 2020. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is covered
b+y Water Quality General Certification Number 4139 which can be viewed on our web site at
https:Hdeg. nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-permits/wastewater-branch/401-wetlands-
buffer-permits/401-401-isolated-wetlands-waters-program The General Certification allows you to use
Nationwide Permit Number 39 once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). Please
note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits before proceeding with your project, including
those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non -Discharge, and Water Supply
Watershed regulations.
The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the General Certification. It is advised that all conditions of the Certification are reviewed prior to
initiation of the project. In addition to the requirements of the Certification, you must also comply with the
following conditions:
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send us a new
application for a new Certification. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one
acre, or of total impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 300 linear feet, compensatory
mitigation may be required. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the
Certification and approval letter; and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. 15A
NCAC 02H .0506 and 15A NCAC 02H .0507
2. The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at the approved impact
areas has commenced. 15A NCAC 02H .0502 (e)
D Qi� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 1 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
N11H fH (:A�i(1!.INA �
n.w O'tore'wml talQ"I 704.663.1699

3. Approved Impacts:
Type of Impact
Amount Approved
Temporary Impact
Amount Approved
Permanent Impact
Stream
45 linear ft.
228 linear ft.
Wetland (HWF)
0 acre
0.010 acre
4. Diversion Ditches and other storm water conveyances as related to the sediment and erosion control
measures shall be matted and/or stabilized to reduce sediment loss and turbidity. This includes
interior/exterior slopes of sediment basins. 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(3) and (c)(3)
5. Bare/fill slopes in excess of 10 feet in height and within 30 feet of surface waters shall be matted. 15A
NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(3) and (c)(3)
6. Water Quality/Stormwater: Please provide documentation showing that water quality from the
development will not be impaired. A storm water management plan in lieu of such documentation is
acceptable if approved by a delegated or state authority. 15A NCAC 2H .1000
7. Stormwater discharge structures at this site shall be constructed in a manner such that the potential
receiving streams (of the discharge) will not be impacted due to sediment accumulations, scouring or
erosion of the stream banks. 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(5)
Use of native vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques is recommended where
practicable instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods. If riprap is necessary, it shall not be
placed in the streambed, unless approved by DWR
9. The stream shall be restored and elevation adjusted at the location of the pump around and proposed
inlet location above the proposed cantilever overlook. The proposed plan shall be approved by DWR.
15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)
10. During the construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in waters of the
U.S., or protected riparian buffers. 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(3)
11. Immediately upon completion of the installation of a culvert or removal of a flow restricting device, water
flow shall be returned to its natural course. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section
dimensions, pattern, and longitudinal profile) must be maintained (or restored via constructed benches)
above and below locations of each culvert. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched and/or the
stream degrades due to the construction/installation of a culvert, the stream shall be restored or culvert
replaced. Monitoring of the culvert(s) shall be required quarterly and following 10 yr. rain event for a
period of two (2) years to ensure stream stability. If conditions warrant, monitoring may be terminated by
DWR. A report with photos of each culvert shall be provided following each inspection. 15A NCAC
02H.0506(b)(2)
12. The permittee shall report to the Mooresville Regional Office any noncompliance with this certification,
any violation of stream or wetland standards [including but not limited to sediment impacts, and any
violation of state regulated riparian buffer rules. Information shall be provided orally within 24 hours (or
the next business day if a weekend or holiday) from the time the applicant became aware of the
circumstances. A written submission shall also be provided within 5 business days of the time the
applicant becomes aware of the circumstances. The written submission shall contain a description of
the noncompliance, and its causes; the period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times, if the
noncompliance has not been corrected, the anticipated time compliance is expected to continue; and

steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance. The
Division may waive the written submission requirement on a case -by -case basis. 15A NCAC 02B .0200
13. The Permittee shall ensure that the final design drawings adhere to the permit and to the permit
drawings submitted for approval. 15A NCAC 02H .0507 (c) and 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(2) and (c)(2)
14. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return a "Certificate of Completion" form
to the 401/Wetlands Branch of the Division using the following link:
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Certificate-of-Completion. 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)
This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of the General Statute 150B by filing
a written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of the Administrative Hearings (hereby known as
OAH). A petition form may be obtained from the OAH at http://www.ncoah.com/or by calling the OAH Clerk's
Office at [phone].
Within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of this notice, a petition must be filed with the OAH. A petition
is considered filed when the original and one (1) copy along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received in
the OAH during normal office hours (Monday through Friday, 8:00 am to 5:00 pm, excluding state holidays).
The petitions may be faxed to the OAH at [phone], provided the original and one (1) copy of the
petition along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within five (5) business days following
the faxed transmission. Mailing address for the OAH:
If sending via US Postal Service:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
If sending via delivery service (UPS. FedEx, etc.)
Office of Administrative Hearings
1711 New Hope Church Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609-6285
One (1) copy of the petition must also be served on DEQ as follows:
Mr. Bill Lane, General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
This letter completes the review by the Division under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have
any questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699.
Sincerely,
CA
DocuSigned by:
.r44tW H P441ft for
F161FB69A2D84A3...
Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office, DEQ
Attachment
cc: Bryan Rhoden Reynolds, Army Corps of Engineers, Charlotte, email
Len Rindner, WPEG, email
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch file
MRO, Land Quality

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
NCDWR Project No.:
Applicant:
Project Name:
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification:
County:
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any
subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401 Wetland & Buffer Permitting
Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Resources, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1617. This form may be
returned to NCDWR by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to
send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was
used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications,
and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Agent's Certification
Date:
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was
used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications,
and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Engineer's Certification
Partial Final
Date:
I, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of North
Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project for the
Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the
construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401
Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature Registration No. Date

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2020-00946 County: Mecklenburg U.S.G.S. Quad: NC-Derita
GENERAL PERNHT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Permittee: Summit Avenue URP, LLP
Matthew Browder
Address: 1440 South Tryon Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 29203
Telephone Number: 646-346-8871
E-mail: matt(&browdergroup.com
Size (acres) —81 Nearest Town Charlotte
Nearest Waterway Mallard Creek River Basin Upper Pee Dee
USGS HUC 03040105 Coordinates Latitude: 35.3276
Longitude:-80.7690
Location description: The review area is located on the south side of Governor Hunt Road; approximately 0.1 miles east of the
intersection of Governor Hunt Road and Mallard Creek Road. PIN: 04713104. Reference review area description shown in
Pre -Construction Notification package entitled "Figure 1, Vicinity Mad' and Dated 02/23/2020.
Description of projects area and activity: This verification authorizes the permanent stream impacts of 228 linear feet along with
temnorary stream impacts of 45 linear feet to facilitate the development of commercial develonment of a camnus consisting of
the East Campus, West Campus, University Training Center, daycare facility, and Data Center. All temporary stream impacts
will be restored to pre-existing conditions after the completion of construction. Table 1 nrovides a summary of all nronosed
impacts.
Feature Impacted
Duration of Impact
Amount of Impact
Reason for Impact
Stream C
Permanent
152 linear feet
Culvert installation
Stream C
Temporary
20 linear feet
Dewatering activities
Stream C
Temporary
20 linear feet
Construction access
Stream G
Permanent
76 linear feet
Grading
Stream G
Temporary
5 linear feet
Construction access
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS
228 linear feet
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS
45 linear feet
Applicable Law(s): 0 Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: NWP 39. Commercial and Institutional Developments
SEE ATTACHED NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL, AND/OR SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed
Conditions, your application signed and dated 7/8/2020, and the enclosed plans Overall Site Plan (Figures 15-25 dated 6/30/2020.
Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order,
a restoration order, a Class I administrative penalty, and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified, suspended
or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this
verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified
nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would
no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction)
or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed
within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary authority has
been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.

Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Resources (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), prior
to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management Morehead City, NC, at [phone].
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State
or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory program,
please contact Bryan Roden -Reynolds at 704-510-1440or brvan.roden-reynolds(a)usace.army.mil.
RODEN
Corps Regulatory Official: REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KENNETH.1263385574
Expiration Date of Verification: 03/18/2022
Dig iMily signed by BODEN BEYNOLDS.BWAN.KENNETH.1263385574
Date: 2020.07.30 12:5920 -04'00'
Date: 7/30/2020
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Daniel Kuefler
Address: 10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
Telephone Number: 336-554-2728
E-mail: Daniel.kuefler(a,wetlands-epg.com

SAW-2020-00946
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
a. In order to compensate for impacts associated with this permit, mitigation shall be provided in accordance
with the provisions outlined on the most recent version of the attached Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility
Transfer Form. The requirements of this form, including any special conditions listed on this form, are hereby
incorporated as special conditions of this permit authorization.

Action ID Number: SAW-2020-00946 County: Mecklenburg
Permittee: Summit Avenue URP, LLP, Matthew Browder
Project Name: Project URP
Date Verification Issued: 7/30/2020
Project Manager: Bryan Roden -Reynolds
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: Bryan Roden -Reynolds
Charlotte Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
or
bryan.roden-reynolds@us ace. army. mil
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. Failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this authorization may
result in the Corps suspending, modifying or revoking the authorization and/or issuing a Class I
administrative penalty, or initiating other appropriate legal action.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee Date

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD
SUBJECT: Department of the Army Memorandum Documenting General Permit
Verification
1.0 Introduction and overview: Information about the proposal subject to one or more of
the Corps regulatory authorities is provided in Section 1, detailed evaluation of the
activity is found in Sections 2 through 4 and findings are documented in Section 5 of this
memorandum. Further, summary information about the activity including administrative
history of actions taken during project evaluation is attached (ORM2 summary).
1.1 Applicant name: Summit Avenue URP, LLP, Matthew Browder
1.2 Activity location: Latitude- 35.3276 Longitude:-80.7690 Location description: The review
area is located on the south side of Governor Hunt Road; approximately 0.1 miles
east of the intersection of Governor Hunt Road and Mallard Creek Road. PIN:
04713104. Reference review area description shown in Pre -Construction
Notification package entitled "Figure 1, Vicinity Map" and Dated 02/23/2020.
1.3 Description of activity requiring verification -This verification would authorize the
permanent stream impacts of 228 linear feet along with temporary stream impacts
of 45 linear feet to facilitate the development of commercial development of a
campus consisting of the East Campus, West Campus, University Training
Center, daycare facility, and Data Center. All temporary stream impacts will be
restored to pre-existing conditions after the completion of construction. Table 1
provides a summary of all proposed impacts.
1.4 Is this an After -the -Fact verification? No.
1.5 Date PCN determined complete for processing 7/15/2020
1.6 Jurisdiction Determination completed? A Preliminary JD was completed on
6/10/2020.
1.7 Permit authority: Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344)
1.8 Applicable Permit: NWP 39. Commercial and Institutional Developments
1.9 Activity requires written waiver of NWP limits? No.
1.10 Activity requires a waiver from the requirements of a regional condition(s)? No.
2.0 Evaluation of the Pre -Construction Notification
2.1 Direct and indirect effects caused by the GP activity: The direct effects of the
proposed activity in waters would include the loss of jurisdictional waters (as
specified in Section 1.3) and their associated aquatic resource functions. The
proposed activity also has the potential to result in indirect effects to waters
including excess sedimentation in downstream waters, disruption and/or killing

of aquatic life in the direct vicinity of the project area, increase of downstream
flows, and blocking/restricting aquatic life passage transiting in and through the
project area. These indirect effects are expected to be minimal due to design
criteria and Best Management Practices (BMPs) required by Nationwide Permit
General and Regional Conditions. Additionally, indirect effects would be further
reduced through the implementation of BMPs required by state, local, and
Federal ordinances and regulations.
2.2 Site specific factors: The review area is covered with successional mixed pine and
hardwood forest, with slopes and drainage flowing into Mallard Creek which
forms the southern review area boundary. General land use in the vicinity of the
review area consists of commercial development.
2.3 Coordination
2.3.1 Was the PCN coordinated with other agencies? No.
Agency coordination with the USFWS is required for the Northern Long Eared
Bat. However, the Corps is not required to wait for a response from the USFWS
Asheville Office in accordance with local procedures.
2.3.2 Was the PCN coordinated with other Corps offices? No.
2.4 Mitigation
2.4.1 Provide brief description of how the activity has been designed on -site to avoid and
minimize adverse effects, both temporary and permanent, to waters of the United States
to the maximum extent practicable at the project site -The applicant provided a
detailed statement describing their efforts to avoid and minimized impacts to
waters of the United States on the project site in the preconstruction notification.
Based on this information, the Corps believes the applicant has avoid and
minimized impacts to waters of the United State to the maximum extent
practicable.
2.4.2 Is compensatory mitigation required for unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional aquatic
resources to reduce the individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects to a
minimal level?
Yes.
Provide rationale: Compensatory mitigation is required to ensure minimal adverse
environmental effects. Compensatory mitigation is required to ensure minimal
adverse environmental effects. The loss of stream channel associated with the
activity is greater than 150 linear feet.
2.4.3 Type and location of compensatory mitigation
Is the impact in the service area of an approved mitigation bank? Yes.

If yes, dog- 11 ) mitigation bank have appropriate number and resource type of credits
available: No.
Is the impact in the service area of an approved in -lieu fee program? Yes.
If yes, does the in -lieu fee program have the appropriate number and resource type of
credits available? Yes.
Selected compensatory mitigation type/location(s): See Table 2
Table 2: Mitigation Type and Location
bank credits
-Mitigation
In -lieu fee program credits
x
ittee-res onsible mitigation under a watershed approach
-Perm
ittee-res onsible mitigation, on -site and in -kind
-Perm
-Perm ittee-res onsible mitigation, off -site and/or out of kind
Does the selected compensatory mitigation option deviate from the order of the options
presented in §332.3(b)(2)-(6)? N/A.
II yeti, provlUe llle IdUUlldle IUI Uie deviation, including the likelihood for ecological
success and sustainability, location of the compensation site relative to the impact site
and their significance within the watershed, and/or the costs of the compensatory
mitigation project (see 33 CFR §332.3(a)(1)):
2.4.4 Amount of compensatory mitigation: 418 linear feet of stream credit
Rationale for required compensatory mitigation amount: This amount of
compensatory mitigation is necessary to replace the permanent loss of WOUS
and temporal loss at the mitigation site. Impacted Streams C and G were
accessed for quality using the North Carolina Stream Assessment Methodology
and determined Stream C is high quality and Stream G is low quality. Based on
the quality of the streams compensatory mitigation ratios are as follows: 1)
Stream C, 2:1 for 152 linear feet (304 linear feet of stream credit); and 2) Stream G,
1.5:1 for 76 linear feet (114 feet of stream credit).
3.0 Compliance with Other Laws, Policies and Requirements
3.1 Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA)
3.1.1 ESA action area: The action area includes the waters of the United States that will
be directly affected by the proposed work or structures and uplands directly
affected as a result of authorizing the work or structures.
3.1.2 Has another federal agency taken steps to document compliance with Section 7 of the
ESA and completed consultation(s) as required? No.
3.1.3 Known species/critical habitat present? No. The Corps has determined that it
has fulfilled its responsibilities under Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA.

IPAC Species in Mecklenburg County:
NAME: Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) STATUS: Threatened
NAME: Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata) STATUS: Endangered
NAME: Rusty -patched bumble bee (Bombus affinis) STATUS: Endangered
NAME: Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) STATUS: Endangered
NAME: Smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata) STATUS: Endangered
Effect determination (s), including no effect, for all known species/habitat, and basis for
determination(s): Based on the latest version of the Natural Heritage Program's
NHEO data, there are no protected species located within or in the vicinity of the
action area. The Corps has determined the proposed activity will not directly or
indirectly affect any species subject to the ESA.
3.1.4 Consultation with either the National Marine Fisheries Service and/or the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service was initiated and completed as required, for any determinations other
than "no effect" (see the attached "Summary" sheet for begin date, end date and closure
method of the consultation).
The USACE reviewed this project in accordance with (IAW) the NLEB Standard
Local Operating Procedures for Endangered Species (SLOPES) between the
USACE, Wilmington District, and the Asheville and Raleigh U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) Offices, and determined that the action area for this project is
located outside of the highlighted areas/red 12-digit HUCs and activities in the
action area do not require prohibited incidental take; as such, this project meets
the criteria for the 4(d) rule and any associated take is exempted/excepted. IAW
the NLEB SLOPES, the USACE sent a Situation 1 email to the Service on July 15,
2020, informing them about this project.
Service Concurrence: as established in the NLEB SLOPES, this project does not
require prohibited intentional take of the NLEB and it meets the criteria for the
4(d) rule; therefore any associated take is exempt and it is not necessary for the
USACE to wait 30 days for the Service to object or concur.
Based on a review of the information above, the Corps has determined that it has
fulfilled its responsibilities under Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA.
3.2 Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, Essential Fish
Habitat (EFH) The NWPs/RGPs were coordinated with the NMFS during the permit
renewal process. NMFS coordination/EFH consultation is required if the activity
affects SAV. This activity does not affect SAV. Therefore, NMFS coordination/EFH
consultation has been completed.
3.2.1 Has another federal agency taken steps to comply with EFH provisions of Magnuson -
Stevens Act? No.
3.2.2 Did the proposed project require review under the Magnuson -Stevens Act? No.
3.3 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106)

3.3.1 Section 106 permit area -The permit area includes those areas comprising waters of the
United States that will be directly affected by the proposed work or structures, as well
as activities outside of waters of the U.S. because all three tests identified in 33
CFR 325, Appendix C(g)(1) have been met.
Final description of the permit area: All three test have been met and portions of the
larger project undertaken outside of waters of the U.S. are in the permit area.
Activities undertaken outside WOUS are included in the permit area because
those activities are directly associated and integrally related with the authorized
work and those activities would not occur but for the authorization of the work
within the WOUS.
3.3.2 Has another federal agency taken steps to comply with Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act and completed consultation(s) as required? No.
3.3.3 Known cultural resource sites present and/or survey or other additional
information needed? No. Based on the NCDCR "HPOWEB" service and aerial
photographs, there are no known historic properties located in the permit area or
in close proximity to the permit area.
Effect determination and basis for that determination: The Corps has determined the
proposed activity will have no effect on properties listed or eligible for listing in
the National Register of Historic Places.
3.3.4 Consultation was initiated and completed as required with the appropriate agencies,
tribes and/or other parties for any determinations other than "no potential to cause
effects" (see the attached "Summary" sheet for consultation type, begin date, end date
and closure method of the consultation). The Corps has determined that it has fulfilled
its responsibilities under Section 106 of the NHPA.
3.4 Tribal Trust Responsibilities
3.4.1 Was government -to -government consultation conducted with Federally -recognized
Tribe(s)? No. There are no known tribal interests in the project area.
Provide a description of any consultation(s) conducted including results and how
concerns about significant effects to protected tribal resources, tribal rights and/or
Indian lands were addressed. The Corps has determined that it has fulfilled its tribal
trust responsibilities.
3.4.2 Other Tribal including any discussion of Tribal Treaty rights? Select Yes or No.
3.5 Section 401 of the Clean Water Act — Water Quality Certification (WQC)
3.5.1 Is a Section 401 WQC required, and if so, has the certification been issued or waived?
A general WQC has been issued for this permit.
3.6 Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)

3.6.1 Is a CZMA consistency concurrence required, and if so, has the concurrence been
issued, waived or presumed? N/A, a CZMA consistency concurrence is not
required.
3.7 Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
3.7.1 Is the projectlocated in a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System, or in
a river officially designated by Congress as a "study river" for possible inclusion in the
system? No. According to http://www.rivers.gov, the proposed project area is not
within a designated or study river.
3.8 Effects on Corps Civil Works Projects (33 USC 408)
3.8.1 Does the applicant also require permission under Section 14 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act (33 USC 408) because the activity, in whole or in part, would alter, occupy, or use a
Corps Civil Works project? No, there are no Corps Civil Works project(s) in or near
the vicinity of the proposal.
4.0 Special Conditions
4.1 Are special conditions required to ensure minimal effects, protect the public interest
and/or ensure compliance of the activity with any of the laws above? Yes.
4.2 Required special condition(s)
Special condition:
a. In order to compensate for impacts associated with this permit, mitigation shall be
provided in accordance with the provisions outlined on the most recent version of the
attached Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form. The requirements of
this form, including any special conditions listed on this form, are hereby incorporated
as special conditions of this permit authorization.
Rationale -See Section 2.4.2.
5.0 Determination
5.1 Waiver request conclusion, if required or select N/A: N/A.
5.2 The activity, with the required mitigation, will result in no more than minimal
individual and cumulative adverse effects on the aquatic environment and will not be
contrary to the public interest, provided the permittee complies with the special
conditions identified above.
5.3 This activity, as described, complies with all terms and conditions of the permit identified
in Section 1.5.

RODEN Digital Iysigned by RODEN
REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KENNETH.12 4ErnoLDs.sRVAN.KENNETH.iz633sss7
63385574 Date: 2020.07.30 12:58:54-04'00'
Bryan Roden -Reynolds
Date- 7/30/2020

Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form
Permittee: Summit Avenue URP, LLP, Matthew Browder
Project Name: Project URP
Action ID: SAW-2020-00946
County: Mecklenburg
Instructions to Permittee: The Permittee must provide a copy of this form to the Mitigation Sponsor, either an approved
Mitigation Bank or the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS), who will then sign the form to verify the
transfer of the mitigation responsibility. Once the Sponsor has signed this form, it is the Permittee's responsibility to ensure
that to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Project Manager identified on page two is in receipt of a signed copy of this
form before conducting authorized impacts, unless otherwise specified below. If more than one mitigation Sponsor will be
used to provide the mitigation associated with the permit, or if the impacts and/or the mitigation will occur in more than one
8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC), multiple forms will be attached to the permit, and the separate forms for each Sponsor
and/or HUC must be provided to the appropriate mitigation Sponsors.
Instructions to Sponsor: The Sponsor must verify that the mitigation requirements (credits) shown below are available at the
identified site. By signing below, the Sponsor is accepting full responsibility for the identified mitigation, regardless of
whether or not they have received payment from the Permittee. Once the form is signed, the Sponsor must update the bank
ledger and provide a copy of the signed form and the updated bank ledger to the Permittee, the USACE Project Manager, and
the Wilmington District Mitigation Office (see contact information on page 2). The Sponsor must also comply with all
reporting requirements established in their authorizing instrument.
Permitted Impacts and Compensatory Mitigation Requirements:
Permitted Impacts Requiring Mitigation* 8-digit HUC and Basin: 03040105, Yadkin River Basin
Stream Impacts (linear feet)
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Warm
Cool
Cold
Riparian Riverine
Riparian Non-Riverine
Non -Riparian
Coastal
228
*If more than one mitigation sponsor will be used for the permit, only include impacts to be mitigated by this sponsor.
Compensatory Mitigation Requirements: 8-digit HUC and Basin: 03040105, Yadkin River Basin
Stream Mitigation (credits)
Wetland Mitigation (credits)
Warm
Cool
Cold
Riparian Riverine
Riparian Non-Riverine
Non -Riparian
Coastal
418
Mitigation Site Debited:
(List the name of the bank to be debited. For umbrella banks, also list the specific site. For NCDMS, list NCDMS. If the NCDMS
acceptance letter identifies a specific site, also list the specific site to be debited).
Section to be completed by the Mitigation Sponsor
Statement of Mitigation Liability Acceptance: I, the undersigned, verify that I am authorized to approve mitigation
transactions for the Mitigation Sponsor shown below, and I certify that the Sponsor agrees to accept full responsibility for
providing the mitigation identified in this document (see the table above), associated with the USACE Permittee and Action
ID number shown. I also verify that released credits (and/or advance credits for NCDMS), as approved by the USACE, are
currently available at the mitigation site identified above. Further, I understand that if the Sponsor fails to provide the
required compensatory mitigation, the USACE Wilmington District Engineer may pursue measures against the Sponsor to
ensure compliance associated with the mitigation requirements.
Mitigation Sponsor Name:
Name of Sponsor's Authorized Representative:
Signature of Sponsor's Authorized Representative Date of Signature

Conditions for Transfer of Compensatory Mitigation Credit:
• Once this document has been signed by the Mitigation Sponsor and the USACE is in receipt of the signed form, the
Permittee is no longer responsible for providing the mitigation identified in this form, though the Permittee remains
responsible for any other mitigation requirements stated in the permit conditions.
• Construction within jurisdictional areas authorized by the permit identified on page one of this form can begin only after
the USACE is in receipt of a copy of this document signed by the Sponsor, confirming that the Sponsor has accepted
responsibility for providing the mitigation requirements listed herein. For authorized impacts conducted by the North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), construction within jurisdictional areas may proceed upon permit
issuance; however, a copy of this form signed by the Sponsor must be provided to the USACE within 30 days of permit
issuance. NCDOT remains fully responsible for the mitigation until the USACE has received this form, confirming that the
Sponsor has accepted responsibility for providing the mitigation requirements listed herein.
• Signed copies of this document must be retained by the Permittee, Mitigation Sponsor, and in the USACE administrative
records for both the permit and the Bank/ILF Instrument. It is the Permittee's responsibility to ensure that the USACE
Project Manager (address below) is provided with a signed copy of this form.
• If changes are proposed to the type, amount, or location of mitigation after this form has been signed and returned to
the USACE, the Sponsor must obtain case -by -case approval from the USACE Project Manager and/or North Carolina
Interagency Review Team (NCIRT). If approved, higher mitigation ratios may be applied, as per current District guidance
and a new version of this form must be completed and included in the USACE administrative records for both the permit
and the Bank/ILF Instrument.
Comments/Additional Conditions: A letter from NCDMS, confirming they are willing and able to accept the applicant's
compensatory mitigation responsibility, dated 7/1/2020 was included with the preconstruction notification.
This form is not valid unless signed below by the USACE Project Manager and by the Mitigation Sponsor on Page 1. Once
signed, the Sponsor should provide copies of this form along with an updated bank ledger to:1) the Permittee, 2) the USACE
Project Manager at the address below, and 3) the Wilmington District Mitigation Office, Attn: Todd Tugwell, 11405 Falls
of Neuse Road, Wake Forest, NC 27587 (email: [e-mail]. mil). Questions regarding this form or any of the
permit conditions may be directed to the USACE Project Manager below.
USACE Project Manager: Bryan Roden -Reynolds
USACE Field Office: Charlotte Regulatory Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Email: [e-mail]
RODEN Digitally signed by RODEN
REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KENNETH.12 REYNOLDS.BRYANXENNETH.1263385574
63385574 Date: 2020.07.30 12:58:31-04'00'
7/30/2020
USACE Project Manager Signature Date of Signature
Current Wilmington District mitigation guidance, including information on mitigation ratios, functional assessments, and
mitigation bank location and availability, and credit classifications (including stream temperature and wetland groupings) is
available at http://ribits.usace.army.mil

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2020-00946 County: Mecklenburg U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Derita
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: Summit Avenue URP, LLC
Matthew Browder
Address: 1440 South Tryon Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 29203
Telephone Number: 646-346-8871
E-mail: mattna,browdergroua.com
Size (acres) 80.9
Nearest Waterway Mallard Creek
USGS HUC 03040105
Nearest Town Charlotte
River Basin Upper Pee Dee
Coordinates Latitude:35.3276
Longitude:-80.7690
Location description: The review area is located on the south side of Governor Hunt Road, 0.16 miles east of the intersection of
Mallard Creek Road and Governor Hunt Road. PIN. 0471310.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 2/23/2020. Therefore,
this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory
mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may
request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters, including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once

SAW-2020-00946
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by die
Corps Regulatory Official identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or till material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact David L. Shaeffer at 704-510-1437 or
david.l.shaeffer(&usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 06/10/2020.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Phillip Shannin, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1 OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA fornh, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to tie determination in this correspondence.**
Digitally signed by
S/' N SH AEFFER.DAVIDIEIGH.1250750573
Corps Regulatory Official: 3 Date 20200610122405-04'00'
Date of JD: 06/10/2020 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable

SAW-2020-00946
The Wihnington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://cot-psmapu.usacc.at-my.mil/cm_apex/f'?p= 136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Wetlands and Environmental Plannine Group
Daniel Kuefler
Address: 10612-D Providence Road
Charlotte, NC 28277
Telephone Number: 336-554-2728
E-mail: daniel.kuefler(awetlands-ep2.com

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Summit Avenue URP, LLC, Matthew
File Number: SAW-2020-00946
Date: 06/10/2020
Browder
Attached is:
See Section below
❑
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
❑X
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or httr)://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/ReaulatoryProg-ramandPermits.asox
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section IT of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section IT of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Cotes to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION IT - REOUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PWFFERED
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFOJ
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: David L. Shaeffer
Charlotte Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
A TION:
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the ODDortunity to DarticiDate in all site investigations.
Date:
of appellant or
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
Telephone number:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: David L. Shaeffer, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdietional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 06/10/2020
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Summit Avenue URP, LLC, Matthew
Browder, 1440 South Tryon Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 29203
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Project URP, SAW-2020-
00946
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The review area is located on the
south side of Governor Hunt Road, 0.16 miles east of the intersection of Mallard Creek Road and Governor
Hunt Road. PIN. 0471310.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Mecklenburg City: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.3276 Longitude:-80.7690
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Mallard Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
©Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 6/10/2020 by the Corps
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Site Number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated
amount of
aquatic
resources in
review area
(acreage and
linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs.
non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section 404
or Section 10/404)
Stream A
35.3286
-80.7704
1500 feet
Non -Wetland
404
Stream B
35.3264
-80.7697
75 feet
Non -Wetland
404
Stream C
35.3272
-80.7658
700 feet
Non -Wetland
404
Wetland D
35.3266
-80.7655
0.2 acre
Wetland
404
Wetland E
35.3254
-80.7621
0.01 acre
Wetland
404
Stream F
35.3283
-80.7627
1600 feet
Non -Wetland
404
Stream G
35.3262
-80.7611
200 feet
Non -Wetland
404
Wetland H
35.3261
-80.7613
0.05 acre
Wetland
404
Stream 1
35.3284
-80.7623
150 feet
Non -Wetland
404
Wetland II
35.3281
-80.7623
0.01 acre
Wetland
404
Mallard Creek
35.3236
-80.7609
2475 feet
Non -Wetland
404

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general
permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit
applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other
general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and
thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6)
accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking
any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by
that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction
in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative
appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or
a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit
denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether
geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an
official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that
there "may be " waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be " navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could
be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items are included in the administrative
record and are appropriately cited:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figure 6 dated 02/23/2020
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. Datasheets: Wetland D and Upland DPI
dated 02/23/2020
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑Corps navigable waters' study:
❑U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑USGS NHD data:
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps:
©U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Figure 3 dated 02/23/2020
©Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Figure 4 dated 02/23/2020
❑National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑N Photographs: ❑N Aerial (Name & Date): Figure 2 dated 02/23/2020
or ® Other (Name & Date): Site Photos 1-6 dated 02/23/2020
El Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑N Other information (please specify): Parcel Map - Figure 5 dated 02/23/2020, Vicinity Map - Figure 1 dated
02/23/2020, NCDENR Stream Evaluations (Stream A&C) dated 02/23/2020
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corns
and should not be relied upon for later Jurisdictional determinations.
Digitally signed by
SHAEFFER.DAVID.LEIGH.12
360750573
•�i Date: 2020.06.10 12:24:35
-04'00'
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
06/ 10/2020
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable) 1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. Tf the requester does not respond within the established
time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.

N
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS
-
t
r
F r
-�
PERENNIAL
WETLAND II
INTERMITTENT
• ,
STREAM F
STREAM 1
-0.01 ac
IV!,�:
k"- ,.
INTERMITTENT
1600If
150If
STREAM C-
1
NCDEQ
700 If
t
F
STREAM
�'
,?.•
t` '
FORM A -
'"_
t
STREAM �'f'r �.-
�• �
+�;�.3l, -
FORM C
1 �, ;•r � INTERMITTENT
PERENNIAL ,s� f s' ` - — ``}���
STREAM A
-1,500 If
USACE .,. r•
WETLAND
FORM
�• _ t j �i INTE RMI. 4
ti .1 I i ti STREAM B�-
i* �• 1 ` ,. jG!
WETLAND D •:k�.:ii Lam`. �` '.� .,�'
,4 �:�' r '�„ �` .• �1, 0.2 act
WETLAND H
4• . f of ` r r r A* 0.05 ac
�:. a.,.
'u
LEG=iqC. WETLAND E
m �`=
Project boundary study limits -0.01 ac_-
1 MALLARD CREEKOW
Legend -
2,4751f Stream
� VJetlan d -
--jectfioundary 0 17
—2FtContours Landscape photoidirection
- Feet
Prepared for: Project URP Drawn By: Reviewed By: FIGURE 6
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Mecklenburg Co., NC NRN DCI<
Summit Avenue
URP, LLC DELINEATION MAP 2/23/20
For study purposes only - Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification