820305_Routine Inspection_20240215

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: _G'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: /�//�� d /� �%Arrriva�l Time: Departure Time: / F County: ��� p� Region: c>4
Farm Name: ,iCdi'wixlX Lt) Owner Email:
Owner Name: 46_7rn� 'Z /},. Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: A!Y/iytitiL /N d-LCi! Title:
OnsiteRepresentative: /e
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: R/001(1
Certification Number:
Longitude:
}j
FI
k
tik�
i
�I
�-; {_�.
I� �E , �I,� k; �'F;,
" "' ,uktii; {
k�{�k ,i
k �• i
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
c/t/
Q
;i �fi
DairyHeifer
Farrow to Wean'1'+
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder'
i
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
� Gilts
i
Non -Layer
Beef Feeder
Ij Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
�t
aii
Tur
't
.
TukPIm
ke
Other
k3n�'i.
F�s_;rrtaq
kiHr�.k
�d1M11,
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
„ TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ffrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes -[� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: Date of inspection: / a
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ,L2,3Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): cg
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ,,ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ;2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes -E]-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes7-'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes .PrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes .4E TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,La"'Ro ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,2'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes F;,J'f10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes 12'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes alqo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ZNo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes C2-No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: jU- Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ,ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ff No
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes _E2'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes ,❑'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes ,ffNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes J21'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes J ' o
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes Ej­&o
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 914 .35
Date: 2- `/ —X Y
511212020

FACILITY#: d',d' FARM NAME: �� LAGOON
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- EXPERIATION DATE
- CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL
- OIC CARD YES OR NO
PERMIT (M91
NUMBER OF ANIMALS
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES
- ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST YES OR NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO
WASTE REPORT (#2+)
-GOOD FQR 0 DAY BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE 1nn 2' NITROGEN LEVEL
DATE �ila'3 NITROGEN LEVEL__�0 -
DATE NITROGEN LEVEL
SOIL REPORT It21)
- EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE
- P-1 (NO MORE THEN 400)
- PH (Note it4srless)
- Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU ZN
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
IRR2 (#21)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROG N (N)
NotoverPAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)

CALBRIATION (x24)
EACH REEL SHOULD BE C LI RATFjD EV RY OTHER YEAR
- DATE OF CALIBRATION �D / ,2
- FLOW RATES aZ,�Z7
RAIN FALL (u21)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED.
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE O! UDGE (a21 a25)
0:2, 0. P: "5 . Cm % RATIO OF SLUDGE
O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS _ PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March in- Ends September 30th
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1-t- Ends March 31s1
Corn: Opens February 15t - Ends June 30s+
Cotton: Opens March 15u- Ends August 1st
Rye: Opens September IA -Ends March 31-t
Oats: Opens September le -Ends April 15t
Wheat: Opens September 1st- Ends April 300
Soybeans: Opens April 1st- Ends September 15th
Fescue: Opens August 1st- Ends July 31 A
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15* - Ends August 31 st