Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
820110_Routine Inspection_20240201
Type of Visit: QJCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: <5—Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ! Departure /Time: © County: FarmName: / ��- �``C��"'�/ Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: OnsiteRepresentative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Phone: Region: f ;eU Integrator: ::i:� Certification Number: L qO -74o Certification Number: Latitude: Longitude: ii Wean to Finish E Layer Dairy Cow Wean to Feeder ; Non -La er Dairy Calf Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer {1'; Farrow to Wean Dry Cow ill Farrow to Feeder E Non -Dairy Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker ! 1 I3 Gilts Non -Layers Beef Feeder 1111 Pullets Beef Brood Cow i Turke s�' +( Turke Poults � l... Other �� 4irf FOP1tItllRiill„8lli , 3 1.5N,t..dlSCi Ii:Liii, {{}t A 3 Illt Dischar¢es and Stream Imuacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: T a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes -E]'No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes t-EfiNo ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 511212020 Continued Facili Number: Date of Ins ectiow Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes _F:t�o ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Stricture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: G Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): H Observed Freeboard (in): c23 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes,,EfrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes .f:rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes _4EfrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ..®'Rto ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 4ET—No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes .E�'No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved/Area, 12. Crop TYpe(s) �'�?/I6J f U�t�rvKGY� G� �islu���(3• LCit�i ! . GJ� Z lei>; 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes�E:;J-No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ®"No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes _E ^] No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? [—]Yes ..❑`No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes _EErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes J21Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [:]Yes F,--No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes -E No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes F]"No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: Date of Ins ection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 'L�?No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ,❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes J2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? [—]Yes 4D-No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ja0go ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? WDZA 071 � &'2"XX, oil IR-14 Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 ❑ Yes _ IVo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ,�No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes -El—No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes - f No ❑ Yes J�pNo ❑ Yes ,._®'No ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Phone: `G6U D %J`� 279-Sf Date: 511212020 FACILITY#: FARM NAME: 7zz4;ez —LAGOON LEVEL PERMIT M+v) DUE EVERY 5 YEARS EXPERIATION DATE CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL OIC CARD YES OR NO NUMBER OF ANIMALS WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20). SOILTYPES CROP TYPES - ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST YES OR NO - Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO WASTE REPORT (s21) -GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER DATE 42 /' /%L)'3 NITROGEN LEVEL 3, _ DATE l/Ia_J NITROGEN LEVEL DATE NITROGEN LEVEL S 0 1 L EPORT(uH) YEARS: DATE /0 h c3 - EVERY 3 - P-1 (NO MORE THEN 400) - PH (NoteiF4.,I..) - Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 8000) CU ZN (IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300) IRR2 (#21) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) CALBRIATION (x24) - EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED EVERY OTHER YEAR DATE OF CALIBRATION Y1=- FLOW RATES .2 co RAIN FALL (#21) -INITIAL AFTER I" RAIN EVENT -LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED PDA NEEDED. SLUDGE (#21a2s) -DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE %�„ �� / 2'✓ O: �I_P: 7. N % RATIO OF SLUDGE ✓ V 0: P: _ % RATIO OF SLUDGE 0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE 0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE OTHER FORMS (#22 AND u21) RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY *If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields VISUAL CHECK FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT CROPS NO PONDING REELS_ FEED. BINS_ LAGOON GARBAGE Bermuda grass: Opens March 1 � - Ends September 30* Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1st- Ends March 31n Corn: Opens February 15* - Ends June 30u Cotton: Opens March 15w- Ends August 1st Rye: Opens September 1" - Ends March 31st Oats: Opens September IA -Ends April 15th Wheat: Opens September 1st- Ends April 302 .Soybeans: Opens April 1st -Ends September 15w Fescue: Opens August 1st- Ends July 31 � Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15* - Ends August 31 st