20240038 Ver 1_More Info Received_20240216 (2)

IMRN
New Limits of Disturbance 4.9 acr S)
fit• `,, _,;
WetlandsFormer Limits of Disturbance (4.7 acres)
' s �• i
Stream - Perennial
Stream - Intermittent AMM&
Stormwater Conveyance
Existing Culvert
Wetland B A
•Stream Classification '• `t 1 4 0.077 acresWetland/Upland Data Point (DP#)
�► +''�_, ti'
fell
L Wei tlanDP` 0.018 acres t •
66,
' } a DP3
' r Haith Branch
Wetland C Perennial
r • 0.005 acres 1669 L-F
4\
iV
So a
,,
k ..* w.
b
IA
Z M l.. s �� t SCP2
., UTl
�,. Perennial
76 LF +.A ,�� v41
j y: .. _ •,_ . a4 . '�:• ��� 1��' ,� �� \�-- '� yr. .t l .
1 DP1 SC • , _ — — — — — —
^1, 1
DP4 1 ir, UT2—, ——
R<n'� Intermittent ,
Wetland D 249 LF
@ 0.007 acres
now
C9 -

New Limits of Disturbance (4.9 acres)
Former Limits of Disturbance (4.7 acres)
?1
® Wetlands ,
0 Wetland Impact - Permanent
0 Wetland Impact - Temporary
Stream Impact - Permanent A
Stream Impact - Temporary
Perennial Project Stream
Stormwater Conveyance
17
Existing Culvert _
S2: Bank Stabilization
SS: Relocation
S2: Bank Stabilization
SI-
lot
i
New S3 Permanent Impact: 76 FT
$2: Bank Stabilization
AOL
Up. NbAr.,,
l
f
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
Figure 5 Aquatic Resource Impact Map
AB Tech- Haith Branch and Gulley Restoration
0 50 100 Feet French Broad River Basin 06010105
I I I
Buncombe County, NC
0211512024

O.PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 12/13/2023
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Wildlands Engineering, Inc., Jessica Waller, 167-B
Haywood Rd, Asheville, NC 28806
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, AB Tech Asheville Campus Stream
Restoration, SAW-
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 89 Facilities Way, Asheville, NC 2801
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County: Buncombe City: Asheville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.572441 Longitude:-82.561225
Universal Transverse Mercator: UTM17
Name of nearest waterbody: French Broad
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 6/27/2023
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated
amount of
Geographic authority
aquatic
Type of aquatic
to which the aquatic
Latitude
Longitude
Site Number
(decimal
(decimal
resources in
resources (i.e.,
resource "may be"
degrees)
degrees)
review area
wetland vs. non-
subject (i.e., Section
(acreage and
wetland waters)
404 or Section
linear feet, if
10/404)
applicable
Non -wetland
1.) Haith Branch (Perennial)
35.573487
-82.558183
1669
Section 404
waters
Non -wetland
2.) UT1 (Perennial)
35.572404
-82.56119
76
Section 404
waters
Non -wetland
3.) UT2 (Intermittent)
35.572164
-82.560995
249
Section 404
waters
4.) Wetland A
35.573556
-82.558450
0.018
Wetland waters
Section 404
5.) Wetland B
35.573613
-82.560108
0.077
Wetland waters
Section 404
6.) Wetland C
35.573355
-82.560211
0.005
Wetland waters
Section 404
7.) Wetland D
35.572039
-82.562124
0.007
Wetland waters
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWT or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AID to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: GIS figures including Vicinity, USGS Topographic, Delineation, & Soils
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 Scale Asheville Quadrangle
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Web Soils Survey Website
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): 2020 aerial on GIS figures with submittal.
or ®Other (Name & Date): Representative site photos with submittal.
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
DATE
11/17/2023
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

SCP2
NC DWQ St> eam Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
i
ProjectlSite: A0Tec V�
Latitude:35.572404
Evaluator:
County: � . ^,; W_�
Longitude...82.56119
Total Points:
Stream is at teast intermittent -j
Stream Determination (circle o )
Ephemeral Intermittent Pe
Other
Tj
if>_ 19 orperennial if? 30*
al
e.g. QuadNameM
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
12Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
M7
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
'D-2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict tloodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N -
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual F'
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = I_)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
Cp
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1.
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 2; S )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
CP
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
C0�
1
2
3
22. Fish
45)
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
ry7
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Clt 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other
methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
9

SCP3
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 2-" Nd�3
Project/Site:fq�
Latitude:35.572164
Evaluator: U " " �.
County: -L'W'l vt--gc
Longitude:_82.560995
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determinat. n (circle one)
Ephemeral In Perennial
Other
�.
if a 19 or erennial if � 30"
t r ent
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor hofo (Subtotal= i��5 }
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
[ 2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
6P
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual L -�
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = S. )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Ye = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = S.
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
/3`
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
'0
1
2
3
22. Fish
L22
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfishes
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW =
0.75; OBL = 1.5 Ot. r 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketc
{fi
i
{k/4_ I h �
pdM5