NC0001899_Historical_2002-2005

TF9 467.
IJ
5024
Mr. Larry Murray
Performance Fibers, Inc. (PFI)
338 Pea Ridge Road
New Hill, NC 27562-
December 19, 2005
I
SUBJECT: Laboratory Certification Maintenance Inspection
Dear Mr. Murray:
• Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DEC 202M
C i ,Nl, RALEIGH f:EGlor;Ai
Enclosed is a report for the inspection performed on December 8, 2005 by Mr. Jeff Adams.
Where deficiencies are cited in this report, a response is required as well as for all lettered comments
and/or recommendations. Within thirty days of receipt, please supply this office with a written item for
item description of how these deficiencies, comments and/or recommendations were corrected.
We are concerned about the CITED PREVIOUSLY deficiency (s) found during the inspection.
If the deficiencies cited in the enclosed report are not corrected, enforcement actions will be
recommended. For certification maintenance, your laboratory must continue to carry out the
requirements set forth in 15A NCAC 2H .0800.
Copies of the checklists completed during the inspection may be requested from this office.
Thank you for your cooperation during the inspection. Thank you for your cooperation during the
inspection. If you wish to obtain an electronic copy of this report by email, or if you have questions or
need additional information please contact us at 919-733-3908.
Sincerely,
James W. Meyer
Laboratory Section
Enclosure
cc: Jeff Adams
Raleigh Regional Office
No'�,' ,,Carolina
?vatura!!y
Laboratory Section 1623 Mail Service Center; Raleigh, NC 27699-1623
4405 Reedy Creek Road; Raleigh, NC 27607
Phone [phone] / FAX [phone] / Intemet www.dwglab.org
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

On Site Inspection Report
LABORATORY NAME
ADDRESS:
CERTIFICATE NO:
DATE OF INSPECTION
TYPE OF INSPECTION:
EVALUATOR:
LOCAL PERSON(S) CONTACTED
INTRODUCTION:
Performance Fibers, Inc.
338 Pea Ridge Road
New Hill, NC 27562
#5024
December 08, 2005
Field Maintenance Inspection
Jeffrey R. Adams
Mr. Chuck Powell, Mr. Larry Murray and Mr. Greg Gardner
This laboratory was inspected to verify its compliance with the requirements of 15A NCAC 02H.0800 for
the analysis of environmental samples.
II. GENERAL COMMENTS:
The inspection consisted of reviewing data for NPDES #NC001899. The staff is congratulated for
doing a good job of implementing the laboratory certification program. Very good bench sheets and
forms are used. The equipment appears to be in good shape and well maintained. Records are well
kept and the data appeared accurate. Unfortunately there is one "cited previously" and other
deficiencies.
III. DEFICIENCIES, RECOMMENDATIONS, REQUIREMENTS, AND COMMENTS:
Dissolved Oxygen:
1). Deficiency: The annual NIST and ATC check of the DO temperature probe is not being
performed. Cited Previously.
REQUIREMENT: "All thermometers must meet National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
specifications for accuracy or be checked against a NIST traceable thermometer and proper corrections
made and posted on the instrument." Ref: 15A NCAC 2H .0805 (a) (7) (0). CITED PREVIOUSLY.
A). Comment: The laboratory is recording the daily air calibration in % DO saturation rather than in
mg/L.
Recommendation: It is highly recommended that laboratory record the air calibration in mg/L rather
than % DO saturation for ease in comparing the air calibration data with the sample analysis data.
Recommend referring to manufacturers air calibration chart for instructions on determining the air
calibration values based on temperature.
Total Residual Chlorine:
2). Deficiency: The laboratory does not have a standard at the low reporting limit concentration. The
laboratory's (5) point annual calibration standard curve far exceeded the analytical range. The (5) point
curve consisted of standards with a 1.00, 2.00, 3.00, 4.00 and 5.00 mg/L concentration standards. The
lowest calibration standard of 1.00 mg/L exceeded the highest residual chlorine effluent measurement.

Page 2
#5024 Performance Fibers, Inc.
40
Requirement: For analytical Procedures requiring analysis of a series of standards, the concentrations
of these standards must bracket the concentration of the samples analyzed. One of the standards must
have a concentration equal to the laboratory's lower reporting concentration for the parameter involved.
For colorimetric analyses a series of five (5) standards for a curve prepared annually or three (3)
standards for curves established each day. The curve must be updated as set forth in the standard
procedures, each time the slope changes more than 10 percent at midrange, each time a new stock is
prepared, or at least every 12 months. Each analyst performing the analytical procedure must produce a
standard curve annually. Ref 15A NCAC 2H .0805 (a) (7) (1)
B). Comment: The inspector suggested to the laboratory that their annual standard calibration curve
consist of the following concentrations of 0.10, 0.20, 0.50, 1.00 and 2.00 mg/L Chlorine. Since the
inspection the laboratory has analyzed a new (5) point calibration curve using the lower concentrations
with a correlation coefficient of 0.9990 well within the acceptable limits of >0.995 and submitted it to the
laboratory for review. Inspector informed the laboratory that it must submit an annual calibration curve
for each analyst and submit it to this office for review.
Temperature:
C). Comment: The laboratory is using the DO meter for the effluent temperature measurements. The
laboratory is not performing the annual NIST/ATC checks and verifications on this meter. (stated in
deficiency (1).
REQUIREMENT: "All thermometers must meet National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
specifications for accuracy or be checked against a NIST traceable thermometer and proper corrections
made and posted on the instrument (even if zero)." Ref: 15A NCAC 2H .0805 (a) (7) (0). CITED
PREVIOUSLY.
IV. PAPER TRAIL INVESTIGATION:
Laboratory bench sheet data was compared to DMR reports for the months of January through
November, 2005 and a reporting error was found in the reporting of Total Residual Chlorine on the DMR
reports.
3). Deficiency: The laboratory was reporting data below the lowest standard on the calibration curve.
D). Comment: The laboratory's lowest standard was 1.00 mg/L residual chlorine. They were reporting
all "zeros' rather than <1.00 mg/L.
Requirement: The laboratory cannot report data below the Lowest Reporting Limit (LRL) (lowest point
on the standard calibration curve of 1.00 mg/L.), therefore data should have been reported as <1.00
mg/L. The inspector informed the laboratory that all reported residual chlorine data from January to
November, 2005 must be corrected, amended and filed with the NC DWQ Regional office as soon as
possible. Since the inspection the laboratory informed me that the regional office had been notified of
the error and that data had been properly corrected and an amendment form had been filed with the
regional DWQ office.
Comment: There have been some laboratory personnel changes due to an untimely and lengthy
illness of one of the key employees, possibly attributing to the failure to correct the deficiency cited on
the previous inspection. Laboratory assured inspector this would not reoccur, and that all temperature
measuring devices would be checked and verified annually and any corrections be documented (even if
zero) and to be posted on each device. The NIST checks were performed on the other devices, but the
DO meter was accidentally overlooked. Inspector feels this was an accidental oversight on the analyst

Page 3
#5024 Performance Fibers, Inc.
part and that laboratory has been working diligently with the inspector to resolve and correct these
deficiencies.
All other bench and contract data appeared to be accurately reported and no transcription errors were
detected. Inspector would like to commend the laboratory personnel for their assistance in the data
review and inspection process.
V. CONCLUSIONS:
Ref: 15A NCAC 2H .0807 (a) (1) and (14)
Laboratory Decertification:
A laboratory may be decertified for any or all parameters for up to one year for any or all of the
following infractions:
(1) Failing to maintain the facilities, or records, or personnel, or equipment, or quality control
program as set forth in the application, and these Rules; or
(14) Failing to comply with any other terms, conditions, or requirements of this Section or of a
Laboratory certification.
Correcting the above cited deficiencies and comments and implementing the recommendations will
help this lab to produce quality data and meet certification requirements. Please respond to all
numbered deficiencies and lettered comments. Correcting the above cited comment and
implementing the recommendations will help this lab to produce quality data and meet certification
requirements.
Report prepared by: Jeffrey R. Adams Date: December 16, 2005
3

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
December 13, 2005
Don Peterson
Performance Fibers, Inc.
PO Box 166
Moncure, NC 27559
Subject: Renewal Notice
NPDES Permit NC0001899
Performance Fibers / Moncure
Chatham County
DearPermittee:
Your NPDES permit expires on July 31, 2006. Federal (40 CFR 122.41) and North Carolina (15A NCAC
2H.0105(e)) regulations require that permit renewal applications must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration of
the current permit. 11' you have already mailed your renewal application, you may disregard this notice.
To satisfy this requirement, your renewal package must be sent to the Division postmarked no later than
February 1, 2006. Failure to request renewal by this date may result in a civil assessment of at least $500.00. Larger
penalties may be assessed depending upon the delinquency of the request.
If any wastewater discharge will occur after July 31, 2006, the current permit must be renewed. Discharge of
wastewater without a valid permit would violate North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1; unpermitted discharges of
wastewater may be assessed civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If all wastewater discharge has ceased at your facility and you wish to rescind this permit, contact me at the
telephone number or address listed below.
Use the enclosed checklist to complete your renewal package. The checklist identifies the items you must
submit with the permit renewal application. If you have any questions, please contact me at the telephone number or
e-mail address listed below.
Sincerely,
Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
NPDES Unit e'
cc: Central Files
Raleigh Regional Office, Surface Water Protection
NPDES File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 One
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 NorthCarolina
Phone: [phone], extension 511 / FAX [phone] / [e-mail] Naturally
ly
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

. JPDES Permit NC0001899 e
Performance Fibers/ Moncure
Chatham County
The following items are REQUIRED for all renewal packages:
o A cover letter requesting renewal of the permit and documenting any changes at the facility since
issuance of the last permit. Submit one signed original and two copies.
o The completed application form (copy attached), signed by the permittee or an Authorized
Representative. Submit one signed original and two copies.
o If an Authorized Representative (such as a consulting engineer or environmental consultant) prepares
the renewal package, written documentation must be provided showing the authority delegated to any
such Authorized Representative (see Part II.B.1 Lb of the existing NPDES permit).
o A narrative description of the sludge management plan for the facility. Describe how sludge (or other
solids) generated during wastewater treatment are handled and disposed. If your facility has no such
plan (or the permitted facility does not generate any solids), explain this in writing. Submit one signed
original and two copies.
The following items must be submitted by any Municipal or Industrial facilities discharging
process wastewater:
Industrial facilities classified as Primary Industries (see Appendices A-D to Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 122) and ALL Municipal facilities with a permitted flow >_ 1.0 MGD must submit a
Priority Pollutant Analysis (PPA) in accordance with 40 CFR Part 122.21.
The above requirement does NOT apply to privately owned facilities treating 100%
domestic wastewater, or facilities which discharge non process wastewater (cooling
water, filter backwash, etc.)
PLEASE NOTE:
Due to a change in fees effective January 1, 1999, there is no renewal fee required with your
application package.
Send the completed renewal package to:
Mrs. Carolyn Bryant
NC DENR / DWQ / Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

u
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
November 17, 2005
Chuck Powell
Performance Fibers
338 Pea Ridge Road
New Hill, NC 27562
Subject: Toxicity Sampling at Wastewater Outfall 002
Performance Fibers Moncure Facility
Permit Number NC0001899
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Powell:
On November 7, 2005, I sampled the effluent at wastewater outfall 002 for 24-hour acute fathead minnow toxicity testing.
The Division of Water Quality's Aquatic Toxicology Unit conducted this testing. The effluent was found to have a LC50
greater than 100%. According to the permit, acute toxicity is only a monitoring requirement at outfall 002.
If you have any questions concerning the toxicity sampling or results, please contact me either by phone at (919) 791-
4200 or email at [e-mail].
incerely,
l: t-'
'R. Atkins, PhD
Environmental Chemist
IJ'` Cuaro' a
,tYV
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet h2o.enr.state.nc.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer- 50% RecycleNlO% Post Consumer Paper

i
Division of Water Quality
November 14, 2005
MEMORANDUM
To: Ken Schuster
Regional Supervisor, Surface Water Protection, RRO
Through: Matt Matthews 0 M
Supervisor, Aquatic Toxicology Unit
From: Sandy Mort C,(, V
Quality Assurance Officer, Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Subject: Whole effluent toxicity test results
Performance Fibers
NPDES Permit # NC0001899/002
Chatham County
/ 4
X
The aquatic toxicity test using a grab sample of effluent discharged from Performance Fibers
has been completed. Performance Fibers has an effluent discharge entering UT Shaddox
Creek (7Q10 of 0.0 CFS). Jennie Atkins collected a whole effluent sample November 8,
2005 for use in an acute Pimephales promelas definitive toxicity test. The LC50 for the
sample was greater than 100%. Toxicity test information follows.
Test Type 24-hour Pimephales promelas definitive
Test Concentrations 10, 20, 40, 70 and 100% sample
Test Result LC50 >100%
Control Survival 100%
Test Treatment Survival 90.0% in the 100% treatment
Sample pH 7.50 SU
Sample Conductivity 241 micromhos/cm
Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.0052 mg/L
The LC50 for this sample indicates that the effluent would not be predicted to have acute
water quality impacts on receiving water. Please contact us if further effluent toxicity
monitoring is desired. We may be reached at [phone].
Basin: CPF07
cc: Central Files
Jennie Atkins, RRO
Aquatic Toxicology Unit Environmental Sciences Section

aF WAyTF
blu
R&oy
G Michael F. Easley. Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O Y Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
November 3, 2005
Mr. W. Boyer, Leader Environmental & Industrial Hygiene
Performance Fibers, Inc.
338 Pea Ridge Road
New Hill, North Carolina 27562
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspections
Performance Fibers, Inc.
NPDES Permit No. NC0001899
Stormwater Permit No. NCS000100
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Boyer:
Enclosed are checklists transmitting the findings of the subject inspections which I
conducted on June 14, 2005. You, Larry Murray, Michael Borchers and Mr. Cranza McKoy
represented Performance Fibers during the inspection. Your cooperation and assistance is
appreciated. As a result of the inspections, I offer the following comments and
recommendations:
1) The wastewater treatment facilities for Pipe 001 are permitted for 0.244 MGD and consists of
an influent mixing basin for process wastewater with sulfuric acid addition as needed, a spill
pond, a 650,000 gallon aeration basin with four floating aerators, clarifier, sludge drying bed,
2 alum ponds for waste from a water treatment plant, polishing pond, chlorine contact
chamber, and effluent flowmeter with discharge to the Haw River. Pipe 002 discharges
water form the fire pond overflow, condensate and stormwater to an unnamed tributary to
Shaddox Creek.
2) A review of the plant records indicated that all records are being kept as required. A
comparison of the January 2005 DMR indicated no discrepancies. A review of the data
submitted for the facility from July 2004 through June 2005 indicated compliance with the
final effluent limits and monitoring requirements contained in the NPDES Permit.
3) The effluent appeared clear with no floating solids.
4) Stormwater records were reviewed and found to be satisfactory. All stormwater outfalls
were observed and no problems were noted.
If you have questions concerning this report. Please contact me at [phone].
(Sinj`c'eyr"enl�y,A r
itl�y C��ett GV�M
Environmental Chemist
Cc: EPA
Chatham County Health Department
None
o�rinnCuro ma
'Vill 27y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet h2o.enr.state.nc.us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh. NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled170% Post Consumer Paper

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, DC 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yUrno/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 J 2 1L5.JI 31 Nc0001899 111 121 g5, 0C; 14 17 18U 19U 201J
Remarks
211111Jill 111111111111111111111111111,111,111IIII
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA --Reserved-------
671 �169 7O 7172LJ 731 t74 75I 1 1 I I 80
Section B: FacilityData
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Entry Time/Date
Pemlit Effective Date
-er`.onnance Fibers Inc, - Moncure, NC Facility
01:00 PM 05/06/14
----
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
358 Pea Ridge Rd
.; Hill NC 21562
-P
— M n5/On:4
�'r .7�31
Names) of Onsite Representative(s)/Ttles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/title/Phone and Fax Number
n311iam Royer, Environmental Leader,33e Pea Ridge kd New H`.-1 NC Contacted
'7562/!919-545-3154; No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit . Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program 0 Sludge Handling Disposal Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Names) and Signature(s) of Inspectors) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
... . _
lJ
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
3� N,nC01 E?9 �11 12� CE,i 5/14 17 18H
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checldists as necessary)

Permit: NC0001899
Owner - Facility: Performance Fibers Inc - Moncure. NC Facility
Inspection Date: 06/14/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
Yes
No
NA
NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the facility as described in the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■
Cl
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Operations & Maintenance
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
■
❑
❑
❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MORT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge
■
❑
❑
❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Secondary Clarifier
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
■
❑
Cl
❑
Are weirs level?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of weir blockage?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is scum removal adequate?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
■
n
n
n
Is the drive unit operational?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the overflow clear of excessive solidsipin floc?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately X of the sidewall depth)
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Aeration Basins
Yes
No
NA
NE
Mode of operation
Type of aeration system
Is the basin free of dead spots?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are the diffusers operational?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
■
❑
❑
❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
■
n
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?
Cl
❑
❑
■
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mgll)
❑
❑
❑
■
Comment:
Disinfection -Gas
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are cylinders secured adequately?
❑
❑
❑
■
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
❑
❑
❑
■
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
■
n
❑
❑
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
■
❑
❑
Cl
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
0
11
❑
0

Permit: NC0001899 Owner - Facility: Performance Fibers Inc - Moncure, NC Facility
Inspection Date: 05/14/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Disinfection -Gas Yes No NA NE
Comment
Lagoons
Yes
No
NA
NE
Type of lagoons?
Number of lagoons in operation at time of visit?
2
Are lagoons operated in?
Is a recirculation line present?
❑
■
❑
❑
Is lagoon free of excessive floating materials?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are baffles between ponds or effluent baffles adjustable?
❑
■
❑
❑
Are dike slopes Gear of woody vegetation?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are weeds controlled around the edge of the lagoon?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are dikes free of seepage?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are dikes free of erosion?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are dikes free of burrowing animals?
■
❑
❑
❑
Has the sludge blanket in the lagoon (s) been measured periodically in multiple locations?
■
❑
❑
Q
If excessive algae is present, has barley straw been used to help cordrol the growth?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the lagoon surface free of weeds?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the lagoon free of short circuiting?
■
❑
Q
Q
Comment:
Laboratory
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the facility using a contract lab?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
■
❑
❑
Q
Incubator (Fecal Coliforn) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
❑
❑
■
❑
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is flow meter used for reporting?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
■
❑
❑
Q
Is the flow meter operational?
■
n
n
n
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
■
n
n
n
Comment:
Record. Keeping
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■
n
n
n
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■
n
n
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. mg. required 5 years)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■
n
n
n
Dates, times and location of sampling
■
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Results of analysis and calibration
■
Dates of analysis
■

Permit: NC0001899
Inspection Date: 06/1412005
Record Keeping
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
Owner - Facility: Performance Fibers Inc - Moncure, NC Facility
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
Facility has copy of previous years Annual Report on file for review?
Comment:
Effluent Sampling ,
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
Is proper volume collected?
Is the tubing clean?
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)?
Comment:
Drying Beds
Is there adequate drying bed space?
Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate?
Are the drying beds free of vegetation?
Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds?
Is the site free of stockpiled sludge?
Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to the front of the plant?
Is the sludge disposed of through county landfill?
Is the sludge land applied?
(Vacuum filters) Is polymer mixing adequate?
Comment:
-hemical Feed
Is containment adequate?
Is storage adequate?
Are backup pumps available?
Is the site free of excessive leaking?
Comment:
Effluent Pipe
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating property?
Comment:
Vas W. NA NF
■
■
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■❑❑❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
Yes No NA NE
■❑❑❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑

Performance re r ibtP
June 15, 2005
Ms. Judy Garrett
Environmental Chemist II
Division of Water Quality
NC Department of Environment and
Natural Resources'=+.
1628 Mall Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
Dear Ms. Garrett:
This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation on June 13, 2005 regarding an overflow of the process
cooling towers (TW-2 and TW 3) early that morning. The majority of the overflow is believed to have been
contained onsite in secondary containment structures around the cooling towers and the terephthalic acid
storage bins, spill collection system across the road from the cooling towers and a storm water retention pond.
Water samples were collected from the storm water pond, just down stream of the closed discharge valve and
between the discharge valve and NPDES Outfall 002 and analyzed in the plant QC lab for ethylene glycol and
antimony. The analytical results are attached.
The root cause of the cooling tower spill was a total plant power outage at about 1:60 am on June 13, 2005 that
caused the fire protection deluge system to activate in the cooling towers, which sprays large volumes of water
from the fire pond into the towers. The power outage occurred when an electrical tie breaker owned by Progress
Energy shorted when a snake wrapped itself around the power leads and the equipment caught fire. The
resulting power outage shut down electrical equipment throughout the plant including the plant's compressed
air system, which is used to pressurize several of the dry -type fire protection systems in the plant and keep the
valves closed to water flow. The loss of air pressure caused the valves in the cooling tower to open and rapidly
dump water from the fire pond into the towers. Cooling water in the towers overflowed the initial secondary
containment dike, then filled and overflowed the 4,800-gallon containment sump in the SE corner and the
concrete curb that surrounds towers. The overflow did channel as designed through a drain system around the
tank farm that leads to a 480,000-gallon storm water retention pond. The storm water retention pond is
equipped with a large valve at each end and the discharge valve from the pond was closed at approximately
7:20 AM. Due to the urgency in determining the cause of the problem and in getting key process and utilities
equipment back up and running when power was restored, the duration and rate of tower overflow are not
known at this time. Composition of the cooling water in the towers prior to dilution from fire protection system
is 90+ % water with approximately 4.0% ethylene glycol, 3 — 5% solids (oligomers, dirt, grit, etc.) and less than
0.01% of diethylene glycol, antimony, and 1,4-dioxane.
The water in the storm water retention pond was pumped to the spill basin at the wastewater treatment plant
on June 14, 2005 where it will be slowly blended with process influent to the aeration basin. The remaining
water in the pond that is below the fixed pump suction fitting will either be diluted with river water then
pumped to the wastewater treatment plant or the pond will be allowed to accumulate with rain water, which
will then be pumped to the wastewater treatment plant. In either case, additional samples will be collected
from the pond and analyzed to insure the concentrations of the primary constituents (ethylene glycol and
antimony) are below analytical detection levels before opening the discharge valve to outfall 002.
PF.A RIUOI. It1)A1) 1 NINX I111_I_, NC '_-in_ 1 F I 1 1119 i 4 2 12

n
u
June 15, 2005
Ms. Judy Garrett
Page 2 of 2
To prevent a future overflow situation should the plant lose power, we are investigating the addition of a
backup compressed air supply or nitrogen supply for the cooling tower fire protection system.
Please call me if you have any additional questions after reviewing this report at [phone].
Sincerely,
W. L. Boyer, REM
Leader Environmental & Industrial Hygiene
Attachment
W/Attachment
cc: Don Peterson
Danny Stidham

Sample Results
(Samples collected — 9:00 AM on 6/13/05)
Sample
Description of Sample Point
Antimony Result (mg/I)
Ethylene Glycol Result
Number
(m /1)
1
Stormwater retention pond
3.9
2,200
(east end)
2
Immediately downstream of closed
2.7
0.00
discharge valve for storm water
retention pond
3
Between closed discharge valve and
1.3
0.00
outfall 002

Performance Y* Fibers
April 8, 2005
Ms. Judy Garrett
Environmental Chemist II
Division of Water Quality
NC Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
Dear Ms. Garrett:
This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation on the afternoon of April 8, 2005 regarding an oil
spill at the Performance Fibers' facility in New Hill, North Carolina. The oil spill occurred on April 7,
2005 at approximately 8:30 PM. The track -mobile operator discovered the spill during the movement
of railcars when he got out of the cab to manually switch tracks. The track -mobile has an oil pressure
gauge, but it isn't illuminated so a drop in oil pressure wouldn't have been detected in the cab. There
was no evidence of an oil leak prior to operating the track -mobile that evening.
An investigation discovered that the oil pan drain plug came loose during the movement of railcars
spraying about 9 quarts of oil in a six to eight inch wide streak down approximately 50 yards of
railroad ballast (large size gravel). Initial containment action was to pour oil dry (absorbent clay
pellets) over the oil the entire length of the spill. Rainfall during the night broke down the oil dry
pellets making cleanup impractical.
At 7:30 AM on April 8, 2005 the down gradient side of the ballast and the two storm water pipes that
run under the railroad tracks were inspected. No oil film was found on the water and no oil stains
were observed on the sides of the streams or on in -stream vegetation.
Please call me if you have any additional questions after reviewing this report at [phone].
Sincerely,
V. d. &F�
W. L. Boyer, REM
Leader Environmental & Industrial Hygiene
cc: Don Peterson
Danny Stidham
118 PEA RIDGE ROAD I NEW HILL, NORPH CAROLINA 27562 1 It 9 1 v 542 2'00
Ir „nn.per(n rmm�re(iLers..nm

Performance r` Fibers
January 3, 2005
Mr. Alan Klimik, Director
N.C. Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: Request for Transfer of Permits
Performance Fibers, Inc.
338 Pea Ridge Road
New Hill, NC 27562
Dear Mr. Klimik:
Performance Fibers Enterprises, Inc. (PFEI), an affiliate of Sun Capital Partners, Inc., purchased the Performance
Fibers business from Honeywell International Inc. (Honeywell) on December 21, 2004. Pursuant to the transaction
Honeywell has transferred to PFEI and its designees, including its subsidiary Performance Fibers, Inc. (PFI),
substantially all of the business assets of Honeywell's Performance Fibers business unit, including the
manufacturing plant located at 338 Pea Ridge Road, Chatham County, North Carolina.
Change Ownership/Facility Name To: Performance Fibers, Inc.
Change Facility Address To: 338 Pea Ridge Road
New Hill, NC 27562
Performance Fibers, Inc. requests that the following permits for its facility located at 338 Pea Ridge Road, New Hill,
NC be transferred from Honeywell to Performance Fibers, Inc.:
NPDES Permit No. NC0001899
Stormwater Permit No. NCS000100
Residuals Land Application Permit No. WQ0023197
Copies of this letter along with the appropriate permit namelownership change forms are being sent to the Sections
or Units of the Division of Water Quality that administer these permit programs.
Performance Fibers, Inc. is responsible for, and will abide by, the terms and obligations of the North Carolina
permits issued to, or applied for by Honeywell for this facility. The administrative and technical contacts at the
facility have not changed. The Plant Manager is Mr. Don Peterson and I will continue to serve as the technical
contact.
Please forward this letter to other persons in the Division of Water Quality that administer facility mailing/contact
change to avoid future disruption in communications.
Should you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
W. L. Boyer, REM
Leader Environmental & Industrial Hygiene

I w -
January 3, 2005
Mr. Alan Klimik
Page 2 of 2
cc: Mr. David A Goodrich
Head, Point Source Branch
N.C. Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Enclosure: WQS PennitName/Ownership Change
Form SWU-239-102501
Mr. Bradley Bennett
Supervisor, Stormwater Unit
N.C. Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Enclosure: Permit Name/Ownership Form SWU-239-080102
:r JAN-5
Mr. Ken Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
N.C. Division of Water Quality
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Ms. Kin H. Colson, Supervisor
Land Application Permits and Compliance Unit
N.C. Division of Water Quality
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Enclosure: Permit Name/Ownership Change Form PNOCF 06/00
Mr. Kent Wiggins
Laboratory Section Chief
N.C. Division of Water Quality
1623 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1623
Re: Field Service Lab ID 5024
Mr. Jimmie R. Overton
Section Chief
Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Mr. Kirk Stafford
N.C. Division of Water Quality
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Mr. James Meyer
Certification Branch Manager
N.C. Division of Water Quality
1623 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1623
Mr. Matt Matthews
Aquatic Tonicity Unit Supervisor
Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621

\o��F W AT �RpG
C.) r
� 1
� Y
Don Peterson
Plant Manager
Honeywell International Inc.
P.O. Box 166
Moncure, North Carolina 27559
Dear Mr. Peterson:
• Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
December 6, 2004
Subject: NPDES Permit Renewal Application
Permit Number NCS000100
Individual Stormwater Permit
Chatham County
The Division of Water Quality's Stormwater Permitting Unit hereby acknowledges receipt of your
renewal application for coverage under NPDES Permit Number NCS000100 on June 1, 2004. We
apologize for the lengthy delay in addressing your submittal and will make every effort to review your
permit renewal as expeditiously as possible. The submitted renewal package contained the following
items:
➢ Signed application
➢ Site map
➢ Analytical monitoring results summary
➢ Qualitative monitoring results summary
➢ Best Management Practices summary 200A
➢ Narrative describing significant changes at the permitted facility 0LG
➢ Signed Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan certification
We have conducted a preliminary review of the renewal application and supplemental information, and
the package appears to be complete. No additional information is required at this time. If you have any
questions about the renewal process or would like to discuss this letter, please contact me at (919) 733-
5083, extension 529.
Sincerely,
Bet i-any A. IS6orgoulias
Environmental Engineer
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files
Central Files
tCarolina
ura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet h2o.enr.state.ne.us 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Aflirmafve Action Employer- 50% Recycled/l 0% Post Consumer Paper

Permit: NC0001899 Owner -Facility: Honeywell International Inc- Honeywell International Incorporated
Inspection Date: 06/28/04 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted anew application?
Yes
1313
No
NA
❑
NF
❑
Is the facility as described in the permit?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Yes
No
NA
NE
Operations & Maintenance
Does the plant have general safety structures in place such as rails around or covers over tanks, pits, or wells?
❑
❑
❑
❑
lathe plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Bar Screens
Yes
No
NA
NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
❑
b.Mechanical
❑
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
❑
1100
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
Cl
Cl
❑
❑
Is the unit in good condition?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Grit Removal
Yes
No
NA
NF
Type of grit removal
a.Manual
❑
b.Mechanical
❑
Is the site free of excessive organic content in the grit chamber?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive odor?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is disposal of grit in compliance?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Yes
No
NA
NF
Secondary Clarifier
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Are weirs level?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of weir blockage?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is scum removal adequate?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the drive unit operational?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the surface free of bulking ?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Comment
at on RA

Permit: NC0001899 Owner - Facility: Honeywell International Inc- Honeywell International Incorporated
Inspection Date: 06/28/04 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Yps
No
NA
NE
Aeration Rasins
Mode of operation
Type of aeration system
Is the basin free of dead spots?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Are the diffusers operational?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Are settleometer results acceptable?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Disinfection
Yes
No
NA
NE
Type of system ?
Are cylinders secured adequately?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is ventilation equipment operational?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is ventilation equipment properly located?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is SCBA equipment available on site?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is SCBA equipment operational?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is staff trained is operating SCBA equipment?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is staff trained in emergency procedures?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is an evacuation plan in place?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Am tablet chlorinators operational?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Number of tubes in use?
(Sodium Hypochlonte) Is pump feed system operational?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is bulk storage tank containment area adequate? (free of leakslopen drains)
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is there adequate detention time
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
De
Yes
No
NA
NE
-chlorination
Type of system ?
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
O
❑
❑
❑
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
❑
O
❑
❑
Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is ventilation operational?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:

Permit: NC0001899 Owner -Facility: Honeywell International Inc -Honeywell International Incorporated
Inspection Date: 06/28/04 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Stand Pnwer
Is automatically activated standby power available?
Yes
❑
No
❑
NA
❑
NF
❑
Is generator tested weekly by interrupting primary power source?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is generator tested under load at least quarterly?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Was generator tested 8 operational during the inspection?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Does generator have adequate fuel?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Yes
No
NA
NE
Flow Measurement - Influent
Is flow meter used for reporting?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is flow meter operating property?
❑
❑
❑
❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Comment
ord Keei
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Are sampling and analysis data adequate and include:
❑
❑
❑
❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
❑
Name of individual performing the sampling
❑
Results of analysis and calibration
❑
Dates of analysis
❑
Name of person performing analyses
❑
Transported COCs
❑
Plant records are adequate, available and include
❑
❑
❑
❑
O&M Manual
❑
As built Engineering drawings
❑
Schedules and dates of equipment maintenance and repairs
❑
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users?
❑
❑
❑
❑
(Ifthe facility is = or> 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the facility description verified as contained in the NPDES permit?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for example: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids. DO, Sludge
❑
❑
❑
❑
Judge, pH, and others that are applicable?
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Comment
jest SHQ

Permit: NC0001899 Owner - Facility: Honeywell International Inc-
Honeywell International Incorporated
Inspection Date: 0628/04 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Fffluent Samnlinn
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Yes
❑
No
❑
NA
❑
NF
❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at 1.0 to 4.4 degrees Celsius)?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)? ❑
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Yes
No
NA
NE
Aerobic Digester
Is the capacity adequate?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the mixing adequate?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the odor acceptable?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Yes
No
NA
NE
frying Reds
Is there adequate drying bed space?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Are the drying beds free of vegetation?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of stockpiled sludge?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to the front of the plant?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the sludge disposed of through county landfill?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the sludge land applied?
❑
❑
❑
❑
(Vacuum fitters) Is polymer mixing adequate?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Hancili Fouioment
Yes
No
NA
NF
Solids no
Is the equipment operational?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the chemical feed equipment operational?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is storage adequate?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of high level of solids in filtrate from fitter presses or vacuum filters?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of sludge buildup on belts arid/or rollers of fitter press?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive moisture in belt fitter press sludge cake?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Yes
No
NA
NE
Chemical Feed
Is containment adequate?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is storage adequate?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Are backup pumps available?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive leaking?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Yes
No
NA
NF
Effluent Pine
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Are receiving water free of solids and floatable wastewater materials?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Are the receiving waters free of solids / debris?
0
0
0
0

Permit: NC0001899 Owner -Facility: Honeywell International Inc -Honeywell International Incorporated
Inspection Date: 0628104 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
FfFluent Pine Ves No NA NF
Are the receiving waters free of foam other than a trace? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the receiving waters free of sludge worms?
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
Comment:

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C.20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection ReDort
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 U 2 U 31 11sonuln99 j 11 121 04/o6/2e 17 18Lj- 19 U 20Lj
Remarks
211111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111161
Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Mondorirg Evaluation Rating 81 CA ----Reserved— ---
67 I 69 70 U 71 U 72 Ll 73 w 74 75I I I I I I I 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Honeywell International Incorporated
01:00 PM 04/06/28
03/02/01
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
338 Pea Ridge Road
Names) of Onsite Representative(syTitles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Lawrence D. Murray/ORC/919-542-2200/
Name, Address of Responsible Officiatetie/Phone and Fax Number
Don Peterson,338 Pea Rdg Rd Moncure NC 27559/Plant Contacted
"Jr
Manager/919-545-3154/
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit 0 Flow Measurement 0 Operations & Maintenance 0 Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program 0 Sludge Handling Disposal NEffluerittReceivingvVerters Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
_6arreV- . RRO WQ//9195714"1000235/919-571-4715
Signature of Management O A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 35603 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
Ncuuuir99 (11 121 ;,,; ;,i,_,. I17 18u
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)

TF9
3
May 4,j,
5024 /
Ms. Jennifer Overcash /,
Honeywell International, Irio:
338 Pea Ridge Road
P.O. Box 166 44
Moncure, NC 27559-
• Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
SUBJECT: Laboratory Certification Maintenance Inspection
Dear Ms. Overcash:
Enclosed is a report for the inspection performed on March 25, 2004 by Mr. Fred
Bone. Where deficiencies are cited in this report, a response is required as well as for all
lettered comments and/or recommendations. Within thirty days of receipt, please supply
this office with a written item for item description of how these deficiencies, comments
and/or recommendations were corrected. If the deficiencies cited in the enclosed report are
not corrected, enforcement actions will be recommended. For certification maintenance,
your laboratory must continue to carry out the requirements set forth in 15A NCAC 2H
.0800.
Copies of the checklists completed during the inspection may be requested from this
office. Thank you for your cooperation during the inspection. If you wish to obtain an
electronic copy of this report by email, or if you have questions or need additional
information please contact us at 919-733-3908.
Sincerely,
James W. Meyer
Laboratory Section
Enclosure
cc: Fred Bone
Raleigh Regional Office
R MEIR
N. C. Division of Water Quality Laboratory Section 1623 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1623 [phone]
FAX: [phone]

_a0:c 0
ADDRESS:
CERTIFICATE NO:
DATE OF INSPECTION:
TYPE OF INSPECTION:
EVALUATOR:
LOCAL PERSON(S) CONTACTED:
I. INTRODUCTION:
On Site Inspection Report
Honeywell International, Inc.
338 Pea Ridge Road
Moncure, NC 27559
5024
March 25, 2004
Field
Frederick L. Bone
Mike Borchers and Larry Murray
This laboratory was inspected to verify its compliance with the requirements of 15A NCAC 2H
.0800 for the analysis of environmental samples.
11. GENERAL COMMENTS:
The laboratory is spacious and well equipped. The facilities and equipment are well maintained.
111. DEFICIENCIES, RECOMMENDATIONS, REQUIREMENTS, AND COMMENTS:
General:
1. DEFICIENCY: The facility does not document all of the necessary information on its
laboratory bench worksheets. Information such as sampling times, analysis times,
acceptance criteria, and various other criteria are not recorded on a daily basis.
REQUIREMENTS:
DOCUMENTATION:
Note: The following criteria must be documented whenever sample analysis is performed.
1. REQUIREMENT:
Date and time collected
2. REQUIREMENT:
Date and time of analysis
3. REQUIREMENT:
Sample site
4. REQUIREMENT:
Collector's/analyst's name
5. REQUIREMENT:
Meter calibration(s)
6. REQUIREMENT:
True value and % recovery of all standards or buffers analyzed
7. REQUIREMENT:
All data must be labeled with the proper units of measure.
A. COMMENT: Some of the daily logs used by the laboratory do not contain all of the
necessary labeling information. No units of measure are associated with some of the data
values listed in the logbooks and bench sheets.

Page 2
REQUIREMENT: The laboratory should review all of their bench sheets and log books to
make sure that every entry is marked with the appropriate unit of measure. Every number
recorded on a bench sheet or logbook must have an appropriate unit assigned to it.
B. COMMENT: The laboratory does not record calibration information on the same bench
sheet with the sample data. The calibration information is logged on a separate calibration log.
RECOMMENDATION: It is strongly recommended that the laboratory record all calibration
information on the same bench sheet as the sample data. This allows for ease of data
verification as well as eliminating the possibility of data becoming separated from essential
calibration information.
Temperature:
2. DEFICIENCY: The laboratory is not verifying the automatic temperature compensation of
the Dissolved Oxygen meter for which the reported temperature values are obtained for
reporting purposes.
REQUIREMENT: The temperature sensor in the DO, Conductivity and pH meter must be
checked annually against an NIST certified thermometer and the process documented if the
instrument is used for reporting temperature results. It is recommended that the temperature
sensor be calibrated annually even if not being used to report temperature. (Other certified
laboratories may provide assistance in meeting this requirement.)
REQUIREMENT: The thermometer should be less than 30C from the certified reading to be
acceptable.
RECOMMENDATION: It is strongly recommended that the laboratory not use a thermometer
that has a correction of more than VC against the NIST calibration. Thermometers with
corrections of more than 1 °C can produce results that are not reliable on a day to day basis.
Residual Chlorine:
3. DEFICIENCY: The laboratory does not have an annual curve for the Residual Chlorine
meter.
REQUIREMENT
COLORIMETRIC INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION:
Instruments are to be calibrated or a calibration check must be performed prior to collection of
samples each analysis day.
The concentrations of the calibration standards must bracket the concentration of the samples
analyzed. One of the standards must have a concentration equal to or below the lower reporting
concentration for Residual Chlorine.
2

Page 3
Example:
If the laboratory chooses to have a lower reporting limit of 100 pg/L for residual chlorine, you
must analyze a 100 µg/L standard and report lower concentrations as <100 µg/L.
If you choose 1000 µg/I for the top of your standard curve, all samples above this limit must be
diluted and reanalyzed to fall within the range of 100 — 1000 µg/L.
For colorimetric analysis, two calibration options are available
Option 1. Blank to zero the instrument and a series of five standards. This type of curve must be
performed annually.
When a five standard curve is used, the laboratory must verify the calibration curve each
analysis day. To do this, the laboratory must analyze a blank to zero the instrument and a check
standard each day that samples are analyzed.
RECOMMENDATION: Check standard at the mid -range or high concentration and should be
within 10% of the known value.
Option 2. A blank to zero the instrument and three standards. This type of curve must be
performed each analysis day.
RECOMMENDATION: When a three standard curve is used, the laboratory should verify the
calibration curve with a check standard.
RECOMMENDATION: Check standard at the mid -range or high concentration and should be
within 10% of the known value.
Annual Verification of Stored Calibration Programs for Photometric Instruments:
an
C. COMMENT: The laboratory performs a 3 point pH calibration, but does not reread the pH 7
buffer and record that it is within 0.1 pH units of the true value as required by the method.
NOTE: The laboratory must document that the pH 7 buffer is checked and is within 0.1 pH
units of the true value.
REQUIREMENT: The laboratory must calibrate the pH meter with at least two buffers and
read a third buffer below pH 10, approximately 3 pH units different from the second buffer and
the reading should be within 0.1 pH units from the expected value. Ref: Standard methods
18th Edition 4500-H B. (4) (a) p4-68.
Conductivity (not currently certified):
4. DEFICIENCY: The laboratory is reporting values for conductivity, but does not have
certification for this method.
3

Page 4 0
REQUIREMENT: The laboratory must obtain certification for all parameters for which data is
reported to a participating regulatory authority.
D. COMMENT: The laboratory does not verify the automatic cell constant adjustment for the
conductivity meter on an annual basis.
REQUIREMENT: If the meter automatically corrects to 250 C and cell constant, the operation
of the temperature sensor and cell constant correction must be verified annually.
Methods for the verification of the instrument's cell constant may vary for different
manufacturers. Please consult the manufacturer's manual for instructions specific to your
instrument.
Procedure:
1. Read the high standard and record the result without any adjustment.
2. Read the check standard without any adjustments and record result.
3. Set the temperature compensation dial at 0.0191 C-', (if you have one) with the probe in
the range of the high standard.
4. Adjust the meter to read the true value of the high standard.
Example:
If the high standard is supposed to read 1413 µmhos/cm, and it is actually reading 1359
µmhos/cm, set the instrument to read 1413 µmhos/cm.
5. Using the unadjusted reading of the check standard, calculate the cell constant.
Example:
Check standard with a true value of 718 Ftmhos/cm, actually reads 689 µmhos/cm.
Cell constant = Specific Conductance Standard
Actual Conductance Reading
Cell Constant = 718 = 1.04 µmhos/cm
689
6. Using the unadjusted reading for the high standard, apply the cell constant.
Example:
If the high standard actually read 1359 before being adjusted,
1359 X 1.04 = 1413 µmhos/cm
The meter adjustment is performing correctly.
If the calculated cell constant produces a reading at the adjusted cell constant, the cell
constant is adjusting properly.
Other certified laboratories may provide assistance in meeting this requirement.
0

Page 5
0
IV. Data Review
Laboratory bench sheet data was compared to DMR reports for the months of November and
December 2003 and January 2004.
5. DEFICIENCY: On Nov. 21, 2003 a Residual Chlorine value of 0.018 mg/L was reported on the
laboratory DMR and the laboratory data reflected a value of 0.18 mg/L.
REQUIREMENT: The laboratory must file and amended report to correct this calculation error
and to provide accurate data to the reporting section.
V. CONCLUSIONS:
Correcting the above cited deficiencies and comments and implementing the recommendations
will help this lab to produce quality data and meet certification requirements.
Please respond to all numbered Deficiencies and lettered Comments cited in this
inspection report.
Report prepared by: Frederick L. Bone Date: April 16, 2004
5

• Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
y, Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
i Division of Water Quality
Y
October 6, 2003
Mr. Don Peterson, Plant Manager
Honeywell- Moncure NC Plant
P.O. Box 166
Moncure, N.C. 27559
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
1) Honeywell-Moncure WWTP
NPDES Permit No.NC0001899
2) Honeywell Stormwater Discharge
NPDES Permit No. NCS000100
Chatham County
Dear Mr. Peterson:
I inspected the Honeywell-Moncure Plant Wastewater Treatment Facilities
on June 27, 2003. Mr. Bill Boyer and Mr. Crainza McKoy represented
Honeywell during the inspection. Their assistance is appreciated.
1) The wastewater treatment facilities for Pipe 001 are permitted for 0.244 MGD
and consist of an influent mixing basin for process wastewater with sulfuric
acid addition as needed, a spill pond, a 650,000 gallon aeration basin with four
floating aerators, clarifier, sludge drying beds, 2 alum ponds for waste from a
water treatment plant, polishing pond, chlorine contact chamber, and effluent
flowmeter and discharge to the Haw River. Pipe 002 discharges water from
the fire pond overflow, condensate and stormwater to an unnamed tributary to
Shaddox Creek.
2) The old alum sludge pond had been cleaned out and returned to service. The
removed alum sludge has been placed on plastic, covered with plastic as
approved by the office. The company plans to land apply this material on
fields owned by the company after receiving a land application permit. Mr.
Boyer stated that they plan to submit the application in the fall. Please update
this office on the schedule for submitting this application.
3) A review of the data submitted for this facility indicates compliance with final
effluent limits for the period from July 2002 through June 2003. The new
permit became effective in February 2003. The OCPSF monitoring
requirement was changed from Quarterly to Annually. The parameters were
monitored in January 2003; therefore the annual monitoring requirement has
been met.
Q«A
N(:DED.R
Raleigh Regional Office 1628 Mail Service Center phone [phone] Customer Service
Water Quality Section Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 facsimile [phone] 1-877-623-6748

Mr. Peterson
October 6, 2003
Page 2 of 2
4) A review of plant records indicated that the thermometer was calibrated in
February 2003, the flowmeter was last calibrated in March 2003, pH
calibrations are performed using 3 standards as required, the influent and
effluent continuous pH meters were calibrated in November 2002 and March
2003 respectively, and the ORC logbook was up to date.
5) Sludge is dried on the drying beds and hauled to a landfill in Laurenceville
Virginia.
6) The effluent from both pipes 001 and 002 appeared clear and free of solids.
7) Stormwater records for permit NCS000100 were reviewed and found to be
satisfactory.
If you have questions concerning this inspection, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ty
U� ���Garrett
Environmental Chemist
cc: EPA
Central Files
Chatham County Health Department

Wate 3rT
►nce Inspection Repo
vib No. 2Uau-Uut /
�proval expires 8-31.98
Section A:
Nationsi Data System Coding (i.e., PCSI
ransactlan Code
( 2 5
LLJE �
/y NPDES
3 C' 11
�I V� L-I �' o g I r9 � 1 40
iyrimo/day Inspection Type
12 17 15�
J � I�
Inspector Fat T pe
//////;;;;;; I
19� 20111
i �JJ 11
Remarks
21II((IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(IIS6
Inspection Work Days
Facility Salf-Monitoring Evaluation Rating 81 CA
^eserved
571 1 1 J 69
70 u
71 u 72 u 73 L11 74
751 ( 1 ( ( ( ( 180
Name and Location of Facility Inspected IFar industrial users a6scharging to POTW, also
include POTW name and NPDES permit number)
� - rnfy\p�kz- N C Fly
Name(si-\cLO^ri-SiitoRep,r/eaentative(sl/Tde(allPhone and Fa Numher(sl =
�1
1" ✓D4 ..
C fA (n -z& tw l(oL? — (j�Gil 0l2C
Name. Address of Responsioie-Of iciallTide/Phcne-end Faz_Numcer
WL Mcy)rcty , lye,,a 1 Ss
Sec:ion-C: Areas Evaluated.During int
SI Pemttt
SI necards/Fteparss -
Facility Site Review -
E9uemfReceiving-W aters =.
Section D: Summary of Fir
s
a
Cantacsd
Entry Timer ate
9, 3 6 f�43
Exit Tirna/Date
) ' 66 q-) o
Other Facility Dam
Permit Effective Date
a//163
Perot Expiration Data
'pt16
(Check only those areas evaluated)
how Measuiramant — < Vperacom.a - l CS ❑1550 (sewer Overflowl
. _ _ _ J Maintenenca
Saif-Monitnting7ksogrmna (Sludge Handlingloisposal - Pollution -Prevention
Compliance Schedulea Pretreatment Multimedia
La6aramryae'--. +�, Storm Water ?- Other.-t-.-
s/Comments (Attach adardonal sheets of narrative and chec*fists as necessarvi
Namaisi anc Signarsrelsi of Inscactonsi AgenaylOfficmPhcne and Fax Numoars Date
lc�a>,
Signature .of.ManagamentM"'I'v
salt
FPA•Form'366(>•-.i$iiTi4=94)W
t tl3'11,a

Honeywell
P.O. Box 166
338 Pea Ridge Road
Moncure, NC 27559
919 542-2200
919 542-6324 Fax
July 31, 2003
Mr. Dwight Lancaster, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
NC Water Pollution Control System
Operators Certification Commission
1618 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1618
Dear Mr. Lancaster:
an `
_.:R RALEIGH REGI� E
This letter is to notify the Operators Certification Commission of a change in the Operator In Responsible Charge
(ORC) of the wastewater treatment system at Honeywell International's facility in Moncure, Chatham County, NC
(NPDES Permit No. NC0001899). Mr. Larry D. Murray (certificate # 25810) is the new ORC of the wastewater
treatment system and Mr. Mike Borchers (certificate # 25790) is the Back-up Operator.
Enclosed is a completed notification of change in ORC and Back-up Operator. Please note this change in the
records for this facility.
Please call me if you have any questions at [phone].
Siny, cerel
t., , "/— tl)dq�,e�
W. L. Boyer, REM
Leader Environmental & Industrial Hygiene
Enclosure
cc: Ms. Judy Garrett
Environmental Chemist II
Division of Water Quality
NCDENR
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
M. M. Borchers

DESIGNATION FORM
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS
FACILITY INFORMATION:
Please Print Facility Name:
Mailing Address:
City:
Permit Number:
Please Check Type of Facility:
Wastewater Class I
Collection Class I
Spray Irrigation
Honeywell International Inc.
P.O. Box 166
Moncure State: NC Zip Code: 27559
NC0001899 County: Chatham
Class II X Class III Class IV _
Class II _ Class III Class IV
Land Application Subsurface
***************************#*******#**********************##*****************************************#
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE
Please Print Name:
Mailing Address:
City:
Certificate Types and Grade:
Certificate #s:
Work Phone:
Signature:
BACK-UP OPERATOR
Larry D. Murrav
171 Oak Branch Lane
Sanford State: NC Zip Code: 27330
WW II
25810 Social Security #: 240-98-9193
%19-545-3268 Home Phone: [phone]
Date: �� ��� e93
Please Print Name: Michael M. Borchers
Mailing Address: 4747 Riveroaks Drive
City: Randleman State: NC Zip Code: 27317
Certificate Types and Grade: WW II
Certificate #s: 25790 Social Security #: 13466281
Work Phone: [phone] Home Phone: [phone]
Signature: Date: 30O3
SYSTEM OWNER/ADMIN. OFFICER
Please Print Name: Don Peterson, Plant Manager
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 166
City: Moncure State: NC Zip Code: 27559
Telephone#: [phone]
Signature: L ) ' -� Date:
********************************************************************************************************
Please Mail to: WPCSOCC
1618 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 2699-1618

Honeywell
Performance Polymers
I Honeywell
P.O. Box 166
338 Pea Ridge Road
Moncure, NC 27559
919 542-2200
919 542-1258 Fax
June 20, 2003
Mr. Dwight Lancaster, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
NC Water Pollution Control System
Operators Certification Commission
1618 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1618
Dear Mr. Lancaster:
This letter is to notify the Operators Certification Commission that Mr. Don Peterson is the new
Plant Manager at Honeywell's facility in Moncure, North Carolina (NPDES Permit No. NC0001899).
Ms. Jennifer Overcash remains the Operator In Responsible Change (ORC) for the wastewater
treatment plant and Mr. Larry Murray remains the Back-up Operator.
Enclosed is a completed notification of change for Honeywell's Moncure, NC facility. Please note this
change in the records for this facility.
Should you have any questions please call me at 919-545-3154.
Sincerely, V _/-
/f
W. L. Boyer, REM U
Leader Environmental & Industrial Hygiene
Enclosure: WPCS Designation Form
cc: Ms. Judy Garrett
Environmental Chemist
Division of Water Quality
NCDENR
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628

DESIGNATION FORM
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS
FACILITY INFORMATION:
Please Print Facility Name: Honeywell International Inc.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 166
City: Moncure State: NC Zip Code: 27559
Permit Number: NC0001899 County: Chatham
Please Check Type of Facility
Wastewater Class I Class II X Class III Class IV
Collection Class I Class II _ Class III Class IV
Spray Irrigation Land Application Subsurface
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE
Please Print Name: Jennifer LeAnn Overcash
Mailing Address: 2824 Sterling Park Drive
City: Raleigh State: NC Zip Code: 27603
Certificate Types and Grade: WW II
Certificate #s: 27789 Social Security #: 238-27-0602
Work Phone: [phone] Home Phone: [phone]
Signature:
BACK-UP OPERATOR
Please Print Name:
Mailing Address:
City:
Certificate Types and Grade:
Certificate #s:
Work Phone:
Signature:
Date: 6' /19 h2G C "-'
Larry D. Murray
171 Oak Branch Lane
Sanford State: NC Zip Code: 27330
WW II
25810 Social Security #: 240-98-9193
919-545-3268 Home Phone: [phone]
SYSTEM OWNER/ADMIN. OFFICER
Date: �
Please Print Name: Don Peterson, Plant Manager
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 166
City: Moncure State: NC Zip Code: 27559
Telephone#: f ..._ 919-545-3114
Signature: — =� Date: Dn 10,
Please Mail to: WPCSOCC
1618 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 2699-1618

State of North Caroling -
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Mr. Bill Boyer
Honeywell International,
338 Pea Ridge Road
Moncure, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Boyer:
Incorporated
27559
TG�k
1-
2--
October 30, 2002
�6 i
r��
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: NPDES Draft Permit
Honeywell International WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0001899
Chatham County
Attached to this letter is the draft NPDES permit for Honeywell International, Incorporated's
Wastewater Treatment Plant at Moncure, NPDES Permit No. NC0001899. The following changes
have been made to the permit during this renewal cycle:
Outfall 001:
Fecal coliform - The NPDES Unit has removed the fecal coliform limit from the permit based on
existing policy and the very small percentage of domestic flow. Monitoring will be continued on a
monthly basis (and this information will be reviewed during the next permit renewal).
Total residual chlorine - Because the use of chlorine may not be necessary, monitoring has been
required only if chlorine is used in the process.
OCPSF parameters - Based on review of the existing data, monitoring/limits for these parameters
have been reduced to annually (organic chemical list).
Toxicity testing - Based on current policy for toxicity testing, the toxicity testing requirement has
been modified from an acute test to a chronic test.
• Outfall 002 -
Metals - A statistical analysis (reasonable potential analysis - RPA) was conducted using the
existing data for zinc and fluoride at Outfall 002. Based on the RPA and its comparison with
chronic values, monitoring has been modified for these parameters. The fluoride limit has been
removed and monitoring has been reduced to annually. For zinc, monitoring has also been
reduced to annually.
Biocide requirement - Based on the information provided in the application, the biocide condition
has been removed for this outfall. Honeywell routes cooling tower blowdown to Outfall 001, which
has a toxicity testing requirement (so no biocide language is required at Outfall 001 or 002).
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 919733-5083, extension 510 (fax) 919 733-0719
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer Susan.A.Wilsonl3nanail.net
fYfi;

r�
U
• Other limits, monitoring, and conditions of the permit have remained essentially the same as
the previous permit.
Please review these documents carefully to ensure a thorough understanding of the
information, conditions, and requirements contained therein. Once a permit is issued, except for
typographical or technical errors, the permit may be appealed only through the legal process.
Any comments regarding the draft permit should be submitted no later than December
6, 2002. If you have any questions regarding the draft NPDES permit, please contact Susan
Wilson at (919) 733 - 5083, extension 510.
Sincerely,
4 AL—)vid A. Goodrich, Supervisor
V61NPDES Group
cc: Raleigh Regional Office/Water Quality Section
NPDES Unit
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
EPA Region W, Roosevelt Childress

C�
Permit No. NC0001899
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1. other lawful standards
and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Water Quality Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Honeywell International, Incorporated
Honeywell Wastewater Treatment Facility
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
Honeywell International, Incorporated WWTP
off Pea Ridge Road
Chatham County
to receiving waters designated as the Haw River in the Cape Fear River Basin
in accordance with the discharge limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in
Parts I, II, III, and W hereof.
This permit shall become effective
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on July 31, 2006.
Signed this day DRAFT
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
NPDES No. NC0001899

SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
Honeywell International, Incorporated
Honeywell Wasteuxtter Treatrnent Facility
is hereby authorized to:
Permit No. NCO001899
1. Continue to discharge process and domestic effluent at a permitted flow not to exceed
0.244 MGD (Outfall 001), from a wastewater treatment facility consisting of an
aeration basin with floating aerators, clarifier, sludge drying bed, 2 alum settling
ponds and polishing pond (for water treatment - decant to chlorination basin),
chlorination/chlorine contact basin, and effluent flow measurement, and
2. Continue to discharge stormwater, condensate, and firepond overflow (Outfall 002)
from facilities located at the Honeywell International Wastewater Treatment Facility,
Moncure, Chatham County, and,
3. Discharge wastewater from said treatment works from Outfall 001 at the location
specified on the attached map into the Haw River and from Outfall 002 into an
unnamed tributary to Shaddox Creek, both of which are classified WS - IV waters in
the Cape Fear River Basin.
NPDES No. NC0001899

- xv f .:,:. f-�
USGS Map Locating
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
NPDES NC0001899
G �
7
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC I
c
1
OV
a
sl ��.4(sn)• bra °�. � � � � �`ti;' � j r
( ,.
\ � 1� �� `. ... � D m $Illy �i r1y1.r.� i t—� •}b - Dge
_.1 .. \�� Cem' tC ' so sal
NPDES OUTFALL 001
L I '\
190 S m \
p,5 �V
�.. :. a. \ �' BM 199 .I
Waly
USGS Topographic Map I'�'•. r `
Merry Oaks and Moncure d
�.. Quadrangles
Moncure, NC°S9 \
ud�
� Intlitnal
Chatham County
_..
\ Scale 1:24,000 N ��Po\(+o��.,�' .\ •,F / �; II
DES OUTFALL 002
C
Z

0
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge 0.244 MGD of industrial and domestic wastewater from
Orutfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
Limits
Monttorim Requirements
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample Type
Sample
Locationl
Flow
0.244 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or
Effluent
BOD, 5 day 202C
10.4 lbs/day
16.7 lbs/day
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Total Suspended Residue
5.0 lbs/day
10.6 lbs/day
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Oil and Grease
20 lbs/day
30 lbs/day
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Temperature (°C)
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Upstream &
Downstream
Conductivity
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Upstream &
Downstream
Dissolved Oxygen
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Upstream &
Downstream
Chronic Toxicity2
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Nitrogen (NO2+NO3
+TKN
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
OCPSF3
Annually
Grab
Effluent
H4
6-9
1 Continuous
Recording
Effluent
Total residual chlorines
I Monthly
Grab
Effluent
Footnotes:
1. Sample locations: Upstream - valve at Permittee's river water pump house, Downstream -
nearest accessible point at least 100 yards below the outfall and above the confluence of the
Deep and Haw Rivers. Instream monitoring is provisionally waived due to the permittee's
participation in the Lower Cape Fear River Basin Association. Instream monitoring shall
be conducted as stated in this permit should the permittee end its participation in the
Association.
2. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) Chronic P/F at 0.94%: January, April, July, and October (see
Condition A.01.
3. Refer to Condition A.(6.) regarding OCPSF monitoring. Where any compound is detected,
quarterly monitoring is required for that compound until not detected in twelve consecutive
samples. Honeywell may use EPA test method 524.2 to monitor OCPSF parameters (provided
the method allows a detection level at or below the permitted limit).
4. The pH shall be monitored continuously at the effluent. In accordance with 40 CFR 401.17,
the total time during which the pH values are allowed to be less than 6.0 standard units or
greater than 9.0 standard units shall not exceed 7 hours and 26 minutes in any calendar
month, and no individual excursion outside the 6 to 9 range shall exceed 60 minutes.
5. Chlorine monitoring is required if chlorine is used as a disinfectant or elsewhere in the
treatment process.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
NPDES No. NCO001899

A. (2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS — FINAL
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge stormwater, steam condensate, and firepond overflow
wastewater from Outfall 002. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as
specified below:
Effluent Characteristics
Limits
Monitoring Requirements
Monthly
Avera a
AversLocation
Type
Sample
Flow
neous
Effluent
Temperature TC
MAnnual
b
fflycol
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine2b
Effluent
Total fluoride
osite
EffluenI
Total zinc
site
Acute Toxici
Annually
CompositeHq
6-9
Weekly
Grab
Effluen
Footnotes:
1. The temperature of the effluent shall be such as not to cause an increase in the temperature of
the receiving stream of more than 2.8°C and in no case cause the ambient water temperature
to exceed 32°C.
2. Chlorine monitoring is required only if chlorine is added in the wastewater contributors stated
above.
3. Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow Monitoring, Annually (see Condition A.(4)).
4. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall
be monitored weekly at the effluent by grab sample.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
A. (3.) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant
mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 0.94 %.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum,guarterlu monitoring using test procedures
outlined in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised
February 1998, or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent
Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be
performed during the months of January, April, July, and October. Effluent sampling for this
testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment
processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or
ChV below the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a
minimum, in each of the two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase 11
Chronic whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent
versions.
NPDES No. NC0001899

9
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of
the highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the
lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The
definition of "detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical
methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the
parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fall results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally,
DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no
later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
and all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or
approved designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be
measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring
is required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity
(AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the
month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The
report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required,
monitoring will be required during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re-
opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate
environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up
testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial
monitoring.
A. (4.) ACUTE TOXICITY MONITORING (ANNUAL)
The permittee shall conduct annual toxicity tests using protocols defined as definitive in E.P.A.
Document EPA/600/4-90/027 entitled "Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents to
Freshwater and Marine Organisms." The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow
(Pirnephnles promelas) 24 hour static test. Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes must be
obtained below all waste treatment. The permittee will conduct one test annually, with the annual
period beginning in January of the calendar year of the effective date of the permit. The annual
test requirement must be performed and reported by June 30. If no discharge occurs by June 30,
notification will be made to the Division by this date. Toxicity testing will be performed on the next
discharge event for the annual test requirement.
The parameter code for this test is TAE6C. All toxicity testing results required as part of this
permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Form (MR-1) for the month in which it
was performed, using the appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-1 (original) is
to be sent to the following address:
NPDES No. NC0001899

11
A_ (4.) ACUTE TOXICITY MONITORING (ANNUAL) - continued
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical
measurements performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data.
Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is
employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit
may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test
and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the
month following the month of the initial monitoring.
A. (5.) WASTEWATER TREATMENT PONDS
The wastewater treatment ponds at the facility shall maintain a freeboard height of 2 feet.
NPDES No. NCOOo 1899

Atg). EFFLUENT LOUTATIONS 1 'ORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting =W expiration, the Pcrnurtee is authorized to
discharge OCPSF related process wastewater from outfall serial nuatoer 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored
by the Permittee as specified below:
Effluent Characteristic
Daily Maximum
Ibs/da
Monthly Average
Ibs/da
Daily Maximum
u /L
Measurement
Fr uen
Sample
T
Sample
Location`
Acena hthene
0.003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Acenaphthylene _
0.003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Acrylonraile
0.012
0.005
Annually
Grab
E
Anthraoene
0.003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Benzene
0.007
0.002
Annually
Grab
E
Benzo(a)anthracene
0.003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
3 4-BenzoFluoranthene
0.003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
0.003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Benzo(a)pyrenel
0.003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Bfs(2 Ihexyl) phthalate
0.014
0.005
Annually
Grab
E
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.002
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Chlorobenzene
0.001
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Chloroethane
0.013
0.005
Annually
Grab
E
Chloroform
0.002
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
2-Chloro henol
0.005
0.002
AnnuallyGrab
E
Chnysene
0.003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Di-n-butylhthalate
0,003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.008
0.004
Annually
Grab
E
13-Dichlorobenzene
0.002
0.002
Annually
Grab
E
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.001
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
11-Dichloroethane
0.003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
1,2-Dichlorcethane
0.011
0.003
Annually
Grab
E
1,1-Dichloroeth lene
0.001
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
1,2-trans-Dichloroethlerie
0.003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
2 4-Dichlorohenol
0.006
0.002
Annually
Grab
E
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.012
0.008
Annually
Grab
E
1,3-Dichloropropylene
0.002
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Diethyl phthalate
0.010
0.004
Annually
Grab
E
2,4-Di neth I henol
0.002
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Dimethyl phthalate
0.002
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
4 6-Dinitro-o-cresol
0.014
0.004
Annually
Grab
E
2,4-Dinitro henol
0.006
0.004
Annually
Grab
E
2 4-Dinitrotoluene
0.014
_
0.006
Annually
Grab
E
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
0.032
0.013
Annually
Grab
E
Eth lbenzene
0.005
0.002
Annually
Grab
E
Fluoranthene
0.003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Fluorene
0.003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Hexachlorobenzene
0.001
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Hexachlorobutadiene
0.002
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Hexachlorcethane
0.003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Methyl Chloride
0.010
0.004
Annually
Grab
E
Methylene Chloride
0.004
_
0.002
Annually
Grab
E
Naphthalene
0.003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Nitrobenzene
0.003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
2-Nitrophenol
0.003
0.002
Annually
Grab
E
4-Nitrophenol
0.006
0.004
Annually
Grab
E
Phenanthrene
0.003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Phenol
0.001
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Fy,rene
0.003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Tetrachloroethylene
0.003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Toluene
0.004
_
0.001
_
Annually
Grab
E
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
0.D07
0.003
Annualty
Grab
E
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
0.003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
0.003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Trichloroethlene
0.003
0.001
Annually
Grab
E
Yn Chorde
0.013
0.005
Annually
Grab
E
Total PAH
_
0.7200
Annually
Grab
E
PAW = Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons; benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, 3,4-benzofluoranthene,
benzo(k)fluoranthene, chrysene, dibenz(a,h)anthracene, indeno(1,2,3 - cd)pyrene
The total PAH's cannot exceed 0.72 ug/1
NPDFS No. NC0001899

DENR/DW9 0
FACT SHEET FOR NPDE$ PERMIT DEVELwrMENT
NPDES No. NC0001899, Honeywell International, Inc.
Facility Information
Applicant/ FaciliName:
Honeywell International, Inc./ Honeywell WWTP
Applicant Address:
338 Pea Ride Road, Moncure, NC 27559
Facility Address:
(same as above)
Permitted Flow
Outfall 001 - .244 MGD; 002 - Variable
Type of Waste:
96 % Industrial; 4% domestic (001); 100% non -process
industrial (002)
Facility/Permit Status:
Renewal
County:
Chatham
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
Haw River (001)
UT Shaddox
Creek (002)
Regional Office:
RRO
Stream Classification:
WS-IV (001)
SI: 16-(42)
Quad
E22SE
303(d) Listed?:
No
Permit Writer:
S. Wilson
Subbasin:
030607 (CPF)
Date:
October 1 , 2002
Drainage Area (m12):
980
Summer 7Q 10 (cfs)
Minimum
release (40 cfs)
30Q2 (cfs):
Aver% e Flow (cfs):
1848
IWC (%):
0.94% (001)
Primary SIC Code:
12821
SUMMARY
Honeywell Manufactures polyester/ synthetic fibers to be used in automobile seatbelts.
Outfall 001 consists of process wastewater along with sanitary wastewater. Process wastewater
is generated from non -process cooling tower blowdown, steam condensate, regenerated water
from water softeners, demineraiizer blowdown, water rinse from polyester parts cleaning
operations, stormwater from raw material handling areas, finish oil pretreatment (ultrafiltration
permeate), beam cleaning and floor drains. Sanitary wastewater is estimated as 10,000 gpd.
Honeywell has worked diligently to recycle much of the process wastewater (and other
associated wastewater). The facility also reclaims oil from the process (finish oil pretreatment).
Outfall 002 consists of stormwater, steam condensate, air dryer condensate, and fire pond
overflow water.
The facility falls under the OCPSF guidelines for Other Fibers (40 CFR 414 Subpart C) and
direct discharge, end -of -pipe biological treatment. Honeywell has no guideline -defined metal
bearing waste streams.
This portion of the Haw River is below the dam at Lake Jordan and prior to the confluence with
the Cape Fear River. There are some concerns regarding algal growth (and consequently some
dissolved oxygen issues) in this portion of the Cape Fear Basin — further down from this
discharge. No changes to the permitted limits for BOD5 and nutrients are planned with this
renewal (this area is still under study).
• This facility was formerly known as Allied Signal Fibers.
Honeywell WWTP
NPDES Renewal
Page I

C�
TOXICITY TESTING:
For Outfall 001:
Current Requirement: 48 Hr (Cerio) LC50 Acute Limit: 90%
Recommended Requirement: Chronic P/F @ 0.94 % - based on flow of 0.244 MGD
(This is per current policy regarding toxicity testing)
For Outfall 002:
Current Requirement: 24 Hr (Fathead minnow) Acute Monitoring, episodic
Recommended Requirement: Same
The facility has had 2 toxicity failures in the past 3 years on Outfall 001 (chlorine is the
suspected cause) and no failures on Outfall 002. Refer to toxicity testing results printout.
COMPLIANCE SUMMARY: BASED ON THE PREVIOUS 2 YEARS
There are no outstanding and/or chronic compliance problems related to the NPDES permit.
INSTREAM MONITORING:
Honeywell is a member of the Upper Cape Fear Monitoring Coalition, so the instream
monitoring requirement in the permit is waived - this will be specified in the permit.
PROPOSED CHANGES:
A comparison of current permitted values, actual reported values (including the permit
application), and newly calculated values were performed and are listed below.
• Effluent limits for Outfall 001 - based on the flow data from the past 3 years, process flow
has increased slightly from the previous permit. However, no increase in permit limits are
proposed with this permit. Trace metals were present in the permittee's priority pollutant
analysis submitted with the application - however, those values are below NC's chronic
standards, so no monitoring will be required.
OCPSF parameters - Honeywell monitors for the OCPSF (long list) quarterly. Honeywell
has requested a reduction in the monitoring frequency for OCPSF parameters to annually.
The annual test has shown "no detect" for all parameters since the last renewal period (with
one exception). Based on this information OCPSF parameters will be limited and, monitoring
will be required annually; should an OCPSF parameter be detected, the facility will be
required to monitor quarterly.
Fecal coliform - The dilution ratio for the .01 MGD sanitary flow is approximately 2500:1
based on a flow of 40 cfs in the Cape Fear River. The NPDES Unit is unsure why this
facility was limited for fecal coliform. The current policy states that if the dilution ratio for
sanitary wasteflow is greater than 331:1, no fecal limit will be given. Currently, Honeywell
is chlorinating the entire wasteflow (process and domestic) to comply with the fecal
coliform limit. The NPDES Unit proposes removal of this limit with this renewal. However,
monitoring on a monthly basis will be retained and evaluated upon the next permit
renewal.
Effluent limits for Outfall 002 - Reasonable potential analyses were conducted on zinc and
fluoride for Outfall 002. Due to the limited number of data points, data was taken from
1/99 to present. Both fluoride and zinc showed no reasonable potential to exceed the
standard (or action level standard for zinc). The NPDES Unit recommends that the fluoride
limit be removed and monitoring for both fluoride and zinc be reduced to annually. Other
trace metals were detected in the effluent with the priority pollutant analyses, but these
values were below NC's chronic standards, so no monitoring will be required.
Honeywell WWTP
NPDES Renewal
Page 2

P
Outfall 001, CURRENT PERMIT (and actual values):
Parameter
Current
Permit
Appx. Actual Values
Cal. Yr. 2000
Daily Max.
Monthly
Avg.
Daily Max.
Avg.
Flow MGD
1"
0.176
0.09
BOD5 (lbs/da)
10.4
16.7
3.7
0.154
TSS (lbs/da
5
10.6
9.4
4.0
Oil & Grease
(Ibs/da )
20
30
22
10
Fecal coliform
(#/100 ml
400
200
17
2.3
Total residual
chlorine u )
0.5
Dissolved
oxygen (m 1)
10
Temperature
(C)
18
TN (#/da
8.5
TP (#/da
0.5
Conductivity
OCPSF
Parameters
• Calculated values are based on average OCPSF flow (and appropriate effluent guidelines),
and an allowance for BOD5 and TSS from actual sampling values (based on sampling
information submitted with the previous permit renewal).
• Actual values are approximated based on BIMS report data pull only — to be used only for
estimation of treatment levels (not to be used for limit development).
Outfall 001, PROPOSED Permit:
Proposed
Permit
Parameter
Daily Max.
Monthly
Avg.
Flow MGD)
.244
No changes in
limits or
monitoring
frequencies
BOD5 lbs/da)
10.4
16.7
TSS (lbs/da)
5
10.6
Oil & Grease
20
30
(lbs/da )
Fecal coliform
(Limit eliminated — monthly monitoring
(#/100 ml)
required)
Total residual
Monitoring
chlorine (ugfi)
only required
if chlorine is
used
Dissolved
No changes
oxygen (m )
proposed for
these
Temperature
(C)
parameters
TN (#/da
TP (#/da )
Conductivit
• All limited values above are effluent limited.
Honeywell WWTP
NPDFS Renewal
Page 3

Outfall 002, CURRENT and PROPOSED PERMT:
Current
Average Actual values
Proposed Permit
Permit
Parcuneter
Daily Max.
Monthly
Daily Max.
Monthly
Daily Max.
Monthly
I
Avg.
Avg.
AvI4.
Flow, MGD
0.091
No changes proposed
with these
parameters
Temperature, C
7 - 25
Total residual
----
----
chlorine (u )
Fluoride (mg/1)
1.8 mg/I
192 ug/1
No Limit
(reduce monitoring
to annually)
Zinc (lbs/day)
0.036
Reduce monitoring
(ugJl)
#/day
to annually
35 upJl
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
Draft Permit to Public Notice: 11 /6/02
Permit Scheduled to Issue: 12/20/02
STATE CONTACT:
If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please
contact Susan Wilson at [phone] ext. 510. /91
REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENT:
2/22/2001 - The Raleigh regional office staff report stated that the facility was well operated
and maintained. The region concurred with Honeywell's request to reduce OCPSF chemical
monitoring to annually. The region also requested that the permit contain a condition that the
wastewater ponds maintain a 2 foot freeboard (this will be placed as a condition).
The draft permit will be sent to the region for comment.
NAME: DATE:
Honeywell WWTP
NPDES Renewal
Page 4

NOTES FOR APPLICATION OF
414 SUBPART C, OTHER FIBERS SUBCATEGORY
(STARTING AT 414.30)
Honeywell makes polyester fibers to be used in automobile seatbelts.
414.31
Parameter
Daily max,
mg/1
Monthly avg.,
mg/1
BOD5
148
18
TSS
1115
136
H
6-9 (SU)
OCPSF flow is based on 3 years average total flow and % of flow attributable to OCPSF.
Calculated daily ma)dmum and monthly average loading based on Q avg = 0.091 MGD (since 1999)
and orb of OCPSF flow = 0.0073 MGD.
SANITARY/DOMESTIC FLOW
Sanitary flow is estimated at .01 MGD.
Parameter
Daily max,
mg/1
Monthly avg.,
mg/1
BOD5
45
30
TSS
45
30
The previous permit was based on a process flow of 0.006 MGD. The average process flow
based on 3 years of most recent data is estimated as 0.0073 MGD.
An allowance was given in the previous permit for the process flow, sanitary flow, and non -
process flow after the permittee provided data indicating the presence of BOD5 and TSS (for
non -process flow). The NPDES Unit proposes that the limits be held the same, although the
process flow has increased during this permit cycle (although slightly). NO CHANGE in
limits (including OCPSF limits) is proposed with this renewal.
414 SUBPART I. DIRECT DISCHARGE POINT SOURCES THAT USE END -OF -PIPE BIOLOGICAL
TREATMENT
(STARTING AT 414.90)
Honeywell WWTP
NPDES Renewal
Page 5

Fad" Name
Honeywell
Parameter=
Fluoride
NPDES_#
NC0001899 - 002
Standard =
180D
UgA_
OW MGD)
0.244
7010s (cis)
40
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
IWCL%)
0.94
_
1
320
320
Std Dev.
92.66802381
?ec'wng Stream
Cape Fear River
2
200
200
Mean
192.1428571
Stream Class
WS-IV
3
260
260
C.V.
0.482287113
_
4
1D0
<200
FINAL RESULTS
5
100
<200
Fluoride
6
100
<200
Mutt Facto
2.2
Max. Pred Cw
836
uqA
7
2D0
200
Max. Val
380ugA
Allowable Cw
192175.5
8
100
<200
Max. Prod
836
u _
Max. Value,
380
9
240
240
Allowable 4
192175.46j
ugA
Zinc Action Level
_
10
100
<200
Max. Prod Cw
85.68145484
11
280-
280
Allowable Cw
5338.2
ugA_
__.._
121
380
380
1
Max. Valuej
34.97202238
ugA
_
13
160
160
_
----- - 14
160
150
-- —�
- --
--4--
Honeywell NC0001899

r-I
Parameter= Zinc Action Level
Standard=
50
p
n
BDL--1/2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
1
27
27.49
Std Dev.
9.00413
2
10
9.99
Mean
17
3
35
34.97
C.V.
0.54091
4
10
9.82
5
19
19.24
6
101
9.751
Mu#Factor=
2.45
7
21
21.411
Max. Value
35
All
8
5
Soo,
Max. Prod Cw
85.6815
yo
9
22
22.171
Allowable Cw
5338.21
10
21
2o.n
11
19
18.61
12
10
9.99,
'These values have been
13
21
20.77
convened from #/dR to ugA
14
3
3.07
using flow for the day zinc was
ned.
Zinc #/da
Flow
Zinc u
0.036
0.157
27.49•
0.01
0.12
9.99
0.007
0.024
34.97
0.014
0.171
9.82
0.03
0.187
19.24,
0.01
0.123
975,
0.01
0.056
21.41
<.008
0.096
0.022
0.119
22.17
0.022
0.127
20.77-
--
0.009
0.058
18.61
� I —
0.002
0.024
9.99i,
___
0.022
0.127
20.77'
<.01
0.195
3.07;!--
Honeywell NC0001899

Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self -Monitoring Summary
Seplefrlber 18, 2C
FACILITY REQUIRFMIENT
YEAR I"
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
RUN
JUL
AUG
SE!,
OCT
NOV
DEC
Honeywell lmerna0rot be. Pam 2410 LC50 ec moon eprs 0hu lynbl
INS —
—
—
>1N
—
NCW0189Y1002 Be6in:1VU1996 Feegproarn A NonComp:
im —
—
—
>1W
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Country: curb. Rc,.: RRO Subbatm CPFo'/
2" -.
_
_
>100
——
PF NA S1cW
2001 _
_
_
>100
TOM: 0.0 IWC(%):NA 01
2W2 —
—
—
>100
——
MRSTermbnN.lne. P. 24M LC50 se mono Spur RM(Grab)
1998 —
._
_
—
_.
1100—
NCW74241/001 BeginAV1/2001 FrrmmtNy:A NonComp'.
1.9 —
—
—
—
—
-
—
—
-100
—
—
—
Coumy. Guilford Report WSRO Sabo tin: CPF08
2. —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
>I%
PF. VAR Sped
tom
2Q10: 0.0 IWC(%):IW OJc
2002 —
—
—
—
—
—
—
HulfsoFlnishfoR Perm cm lire: 0.96%
Y 1i% —
—
>PS
—
—
>%
-.
_
>%
—
_
>99
NCN25135A01 BcFm:5l1/2W2 Frcgainy,Q Mar Jun SWDcc + Newcstnp:SulBk
isai —
—
28.2
AS
—
>%
—
—
>%
—
—
MFNIG
County : Caldwell RcBion: ARO Subb on, CT832 -
2000 —
—
Ps
_
_
>100
_.
_
>1W
—
—
-IN
PF. 0.25 Span
2001 _
_
IS
—
>%
•%
_.
_
>%
—
—
sill
'/QI0: 40 IWC(%)A%r uJen
2002 —
—
'%
—
—
Put
-'
Hyde County Falrftdd(RO) Pru du monk W%
16%—
NCW68233/00I Beyn:3/1/2001 Frequency:Q Me, lust S, DSc + NmtCaperp k
INS
Cemny: NyJc Reytm: WARE, Subbtm: TAROt
2000
_
PF: 0.10 SDaed
2001_
FallFail
NNFW
_
._
Fur
1Q10: DO IWC(%),IW (Na,
2002 —
—
Fm
—
—
Fad
-
Hyde Cwary Pa.,(RD) Wain Prim cm umnn. 90%
INS—
NCW72992iW1 13e8ke3/laWI Pressurees:Q MtJun Sep Oec + NonCoo,:Sps IC
INS—
Cotmry: Hyde Ro,,on: WARD Subbavo TARO]
200D —
—
PF: O.I ON Spirit
2001 —
_
Fm
—
—
Fm
—
—
NPffui
—
—
Fail
'/QIO: 0.0 IwQ%)90.0 Order.
2002 —
—
FA
—
—
F.
HIP Foods Perm cm Om: 90Y.
tow Pur
—
—
Pr
—
—
Pet
—
—
F.
Pars
_-
NCNO7057N01 BeB,clIll/1496 Frequaa:y:QP/F + Jan Apr Jul Om NosCOner Suek
INS Ps
—
—
Pat
—
Pat
—
._
Put
—
-
County: Orelaw ReBun: WIRO Substrata: CPF23
00 lino
NRJFm
Fall
Fall>100
-1N
822
N82
1100
64.8
—
_
PF: 0.65 .,A
>tW
—
—
>1010
—
—
-IN
>i00
•7QIOi 0.0 lwQ%/:IN Order'.
2W2 (S7
LAWNS
671
w
67A
670
San
Industrial& ARrleoNonl CheinkW PERM: 48HR LC50 AC M0NET CERI00R D/sPH(GRAB)S
lm —
—
<125
—
—
—
—
--
504
—
—
--
NCOBBODWW1 BCdn:2/I/V%,4 Rcqumtry: 2/YR Saniatmml NmCo1ry:
Mae —
Cowry: Robinson R,.. FRO Subbum: LUM52
2)00 —
—
—
—
—
—
—
'-
—
—
113
NR
.PF: VAR Spinal
20m _
-3.126
—
—
—
SAS
_
_
._
_
—
—
2QI0:0 IWC(%)NA Order
2002 —
—
InieidF11and/ScON6e Corp. Poimclu I. WY.(Ipub)
life —
N
—
—
Fad
Pine
—
Pat
—
—
P.s
—
NCWN22]/001 Brapti V1/2000 Flequeny:Q Fob May A, Nay + NOnCmllp:Snek
HIM —
Pta
—
—
Pot
—
—
Pat
--
-
Pass
—
Coun7: Nash Ic,au: no Subbartm TAR02
200) —
Pines
—
—
Pau
—
—
Pat
...
_.
Pass
—
PF 0.124 SNdY
2001 _
Pass
—
—
Peso
—
—
Pass
-
—
Pass
—
yQIO0.0 IWC(%):IN.O Orda
2002 —
Fares
—
—
Puns
—
—
Imerusic ul Piq er Co. Perm ills lire: 9 %
19% Ps
—
—
Ps
—
—
Pte
—
-
pte
—
—
NCNO32981NI Beeim3/1/1997 Frequamy: Q P/F + Iu Apr JuIGCI + NonCmnp:Svtgk
19" Russ
—
—
Pant
—
—
Pass
—
—
NRAme
453
—
C..W. Columbuu ReGim WIRO SulAbC. CPF17
2e00 Pon,
—
—
Pm
—
—
Pass
—
—
Pus
—
—
PF: 50 Speei,
Ml Pees
_
_
NR/Pat
—
—
Pass
—
—
Ps
—
_
?QM: 956 IWC(%):8.3 Orin:
=2 Ps
—
—
Pet
—
--
pass
Imsrnadstaal Papa Co. Perm Car Wn: 2.3%
IM H
—
—
N
N
..
N
NC00815071001 Be0m:7/1/1996 Fenqunmy: QP/F + Jan Apr JulOct + NralCongs.Sbek
lees N
—
—
N
--
"'
N
'-
—
N
County: New Hasova Re81un: WIRO SWbnim CPF10
2000 N
—
—
N
-
—
N
--
—
N
—
—
PF: 0.05 S1m.l
2W1 N
N
N
N
7Q10: 013 IWC(%):31 Ordin
2302 N
—
—
N
-.
._
N
LEGEND:
PERM= PC.,, Regmremout LET-AJmimtmtrve Lola -Tuna Frequemy. Monitoring frequency Q-Quanady;M- Monthly. LIM.Bi.onlhly'.SA. Sc+nuantutlly:A. Annually.OWD- Only when Jemhurymg; 0 Dn¢nminueJ monitonni regmremenl
Begin - F1m mmmh regmrcJ IQIO Rmnnng stream Inw Bnw cmmun Ichl . quarterly monitoring uwdew¢s in inomhly upon failure or FIR Moralesda., town, must occur - ex. lair Apr. Iul, Oct NonCan, - Currem C'umphune Rcqunemenl
PF - Pcmmted OOw (MGO) I WC%- Inucam wtu asnenuulmst P/F = PvJFad t.1 AC - Artc CHR - Chronic
Data Neutrino F. FathaJ Miramw; • - CeOmlaphnm p.; my - Myurd shrimp; ChV - Chdo a, value; P - atonality -Issued Prrcenm8e at hghtt eoacrntmnu4 at - Perfudmed by DWQ At, u is Tor Unit: b1- BUJ teat
Reponmg Nomuu¢ ._ . Dam MI topie t MR. Not repmtd Faedity Aninry Set.:, - Inane. N - Newly bo.ouTo construct); H - Active but not Jlthuigmg; l-More Jura available for mend, an q,cmion, • - ORC si0tutwm needed
211

Whole Effluent Toxicity Tasting Self -Monitoring Summary
September 18, 2C
FACILITY REQUIREMENT
YEAR JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
IN.
AUG
SEP
OCT,
NOV
DEC
Hqb Palm Eorride W WTP P. cfe Ion. W%.; if(,u26MGDSrr)oc l , R rN IIm tl51.
Y 19m FYI
N rP.
—
Po
—
—
LSM
P.
—
P..
—
—
NC0024210/001 Bcgim5/15/2002 Frcpoxy:Q tan Apr Jul Oct
+ NonCanp: Smgk
1599 Pao
—
—
Pan
—
—
pass
—
._
Pass
—
—
Couny:GudioN Rgim: WSRO SuN,uvo'. CPHIS
WIN NWbm
P.
Pao
Line
Pau
—
NROae
>IN
>100
Pass
—
—
PF: 160 sl>='al
2001 Fwl
IN
>I00
P.
—
—
Poss
._
_
Pau
7QIO: 1.0 IWC(%)96 Oniv,
2N2 Pons
—
—
Pass
—
--
Pau
HIP Pei.l Wolude WWrP P. der IN, 9UY.
YI9m P.
—
—
Pau
—
Pass
—
—
FuaPass
—
—
NC002022&001 Bcgin:3/IW200 FmgwnI,:Q Jan A, Jul
+ NNComp:S,,k
ta09 Pau
—
—
Pau
—
—
Pna
—
—
vase
—
—
Coumy. Davldwn Repm: WSRO SuMmunn: YAMD
2000 N vv
Pau
—
Lam
P.
—
Ferl
>1aa
>100
Pass
—
—
PF:61 SPM+I
MI FYI
-IN
>I00
Pau
—
—
Pass
—
—
Pys
—
—
7QIO :0.67 IWC(%)93A1 (Nov.
2002 Pus
—
—
Pm
—
—
Pass
Hight..& C.op & Co.f Guar P. chr lino WA (Grub)
19m —
Paaa
—
—
Pass
—
—
Fes
P.
--
P.
—
NCM61123/001 BcgN IWJ/1997 Fral y:QP/F + Feb M.y Aw,,Nov
+ NNConp:Si,k
1990 —
Pao
—
—
Peu
—
—
Fac
Fa{
Faa
P.
—
C.q: Mac. Rcgkn: ARO Subboin: SAV01
2000 —
PW
—
—
F®
—
—
Fog
BI
145
PW
—
PF:0N6 so—,
2021 _
Pay
—
—
FM
laY
NRP.
Fro
-Ion
IN
P.
—
7Q10:00 1WC(%):IW adv.
2002 —
Pm
—
Pye
HB storms gh W WTP P.. rlv IIm: Y(F/.
19m —
Fy
Paa
—
Fed
Pm
—
Pay
-
—
Pus
—
NCN26433A101 Bcgm:N1/19" Frmoony:Q Fob Mry Aug Nov
+ NonComp:SwWk
19n —
Pm
Pay
Pnr.
-
Pay
Iu
Court, Drank Region. RRO SIEh an: NEU01
•
2>IN
No
Pa.Full61
F2
-IN
Pao
Pea
P.
-y
Ps
-IN
PF'. 3 0 slmY
2mt —
Pye
_
Pm
Pass
Pasa
7QIO: 0,18 IWC(%J96 Order:
2N2 —
FYI
IN
-IN
Poa
—
—
Poa
RNA H"up, tar. P. cla lion: 5.8•.
imh —
Pass
Pan
Pan
Poa
NC0004952/O)1 Begln5/1/1994 Fr .Y: QP/F + Mar Jun Sep Dee
+ NorsConp:S.W.
1999 —
—
P..
—
—
Pass
—
—
Pass
—
_
F.ft.
Camp: Cleveland Rc{ian: MR0 Subbavn BRD05
2N0 _
_
Pans
—
-
Pass
_.
_
Pass
--
._
Feu
' F', 01 smw
2W1 Pea
-
Pau
—
-.
Pya
_
_
Pau
7QIO: 20.0 IWC(%)5.8 ado,
2002 —
—
P.
'-
--
Pau
—
H.aMeCH.eeuCoryDr,yfw Po.Ir1whm:4.9%
1998 —
Paxe
—
-
Pas.
—
—
P.
—
—
Poe
-
NCN84301/011I Bg1m:IUI/2NI Fm91vrwy:Q Fe, M, Aug Nov
+ NoIlComp:Singk
In9 —
vase
—
—
Paa
—
-
Fr
—
—
Pass
-
-County: Mali.burg R<{ion: MRO Sulk un CTB14
2WO —
Pau
—
—
Pos
—
-
P.
—
_.
Fad
154
PE O.Il52 spo"
2mI Lou
Btwa
—
—
P.I.
—
—
Fog
7
tso
Pys
—
7QI0:3.5 IWC(Y.)1.9 Order:
Z02 —
H
—
—
N
'-
-
H
Hoerh.r Cels.eWNeed. Rd Penn rin lion: 0.42..
19m >100
—
—
>tN
—
._
.ton
—
—
>IN—
NCeePnP&NI BeuIl/IRON Frmmrvy:Q IN Apr Jul Oct
+ NNCam:SINGLE
19n -IN
—
—
>IN
—
—
Lou
mA>1N
—
.IN
—
—
Counry: Rowan Rcgiw: MRO SuNowln YADN
2000 NW.1W
—
NWPan
NR
NFUPan
--
H
H
We
Pass
PF'. 0388 spew
MI NNPey
—
_
Peer
—
_
Peu-
7010. R6 IWC(%):0.42 pmP:
2N2 Pao
—
—
P..
—
—
H
Holly Ridge WWTP Perm clv llm:N%(Grabl
im Pay
—
Pus
—
—
Pan
_.
._
Fad
Fal
Fad
Pas,
NCW258951001 Ik,NWI1I%I6 Frryucncy: QP/F • Mm LScp Da
NonComp:Simk
1999 —
—
F.1
F.
BI
Lem
Pa.Pul
--
Fau
Par.
—
Pea
Co.., Onxlow RoVon: WIRO Subbaum CPF24
IWO —
—
Pees
—
—
FM
.100
--
Pan
—
—
Pay
PF: 0.1 spaiJ
21101 _
_
Pm
—
—
PW
—
—
Paw
—
—
NWFie
7QIO: 0.0 IWC(%):IN a.,
NO2 NMIW
>100
FYI
N
h4.9
Full
—
IN
Holly Spunp W WrP P. chr lion: %%
1990 _
HRPuu•
—
_
Pr
—
—
Fen
Pay
—
Pos
—
NCI)M3NNNl BrgioNlRN2 Froo y:Q Fob May Aug Nov
+ NNCaup:Sugir
INS —
Poo,
—
—
Four,
—
—
Pass
—
—
Puuu
'
Comp: Wale Region: RRO Subbasin CPF07
2000 —
Pas
—
—
Fa
US
>tN>tN
Pao
—
—
Pm
—
PF: 1.5 Spaiw
SNt _
Pdn
—
—
Faa
—
—
P.n
—
—
Pap
—
7Q10:0.11 IWCP%)95 ceder:
2002 —
Peu
—
—
Pao
—
—
NaveyweB lolyuu...1, l.c. Pam 4111ur LC50 o Inn: W%(Con. Dapfuie)
INS >1N
—
—
>100
—
—
O'N'.100
.IN
—
.IN
—
—
NCONI&J AOI Br{in:12/1/1996 Frcqucmy;Q + Jan Apr Jul Oa
+ NrnCosnp:Swgk
1999 mA
>1N
—
>1N
—
—
>1m
—
—
>1N
—
—
Cowry: Chatham Rog.: no Subbaiv CPN7
2000 IN
—
—
.1N.100
—
—
>100
—
—
-IN
—
—
PF:0.244 Slaw
200I .12.5
12Z
.1N
vine
—
—
>100
—
—
.100
—
.-.
7Q10: 40 1WC(%)094 adv:
MW IN
—
—
IN
—
—
-IN
LEGEND:
PERM. Pc.h R,.... LET. AJmlmxmuvc Lwmr-Turgw Frm..y-Mrwmrmgf,q.cy.Q.Qynrrly:M-Momhly:BM-Blnumlhp.SA-Srmwmwlly:A Anlwally:OWD-Only wMn Jtxhargmg;UOisomunucd mommnng rc9mnmrnl
Brgo. Fim momhrequirW 7Q10.Rrcerring+...Iow Ilowcnlrrun(deI +•Iu.vdy munI.In. Iru. 1e momhly upon fallum or NR Moreno Unt Ioong nsal.cur - ra. Jan. Ape Jul. Ocl NonComp= Cunrnl Crnlpllumc Regm.lNnl
PF•P.,u,Allow(MGD) IWO'.-I .eon wusm roncrnuauun P/F. P.,VF.OI,.I AC - Arum CHR•Chronlc
our. Nuuu.'.f-F.Ilu:.dM,.ow;•-C.udllpMm on.:my -MyxW shunp:ChV.Choon,,whir;P- Mominy of xmmd percrwap.1 Ino"c ..N....m-P.,Iomul by DWQ Aqumu To. Uml:bn Bud Iron
RrpOning Nunuon:... • Daa non regwreJ; NR -Non n7mnuJ Facihry Aenvity Sm.a - lyeuve. N - Nvwly IauayTu comtrvwl; H -Awiw bon nw Jlmk+rging; l-Mum dau awdablc fa math In quylxn; • •O0.0 npvwrc nark)
27

PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899 PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 -2002 DMR 12 Month Calculated
FACILITY NAME. Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
OUTFALL: 001 EFFLUENT
REGION: Raleigh
PAGE 1 OF 12
00010
00095
00300
00310
00340
00400
00530
00556
deg c
umhos/cm
mg/l
lbs/day
lbs/day
su
lbs/day
lbs/day
Temperature,
Specific
Do. Oxygen.
ROD, 5-Day (20
COD, Oxygen
pH
Solids, Total
Oil 4 Grease
water Deg.
Conductance
Dissolved
Deg. CI
Demand, Chem.
Suspended
Centigrade
(High Level)
10.4
5,382
5
20
01
23.23
1,600
8.4
0.92
7.3 - 8.2
1.4
0
10.4
5,382
5
20
10 - 01
18.22
1,250
9.7
0.3
7.6 - 8.3
7.4 Violation
0
10.4 -
5,382
5
20
11 - 01
15.2
1,750
11
0.475
7.5 - 8
0
0
10.4
5,382
5
20
12 - 01
13.333333
1,480
10.1
0
7.4 - 8
0
0
10A
5,382
5
20
1 - 02
10.163636
1,300
12.4
0
7.3 - 8.2
0
0
10, 4
5,392
5
20
2 - 02
11.805263
927
11.8
0
7.32 - 7.96
0
0
0.4
5, 8L
5
20
3-02
14.2
1,270
10.5
0
7.2 - 7.8
0
0
10.4
5,382
5
20
4 - 02
20.546667
1,050
8.7
0
6.9 - 7.8
3.525
0
10.4
5,38E
5
20
5 - 02
21.5
1,230
8.4
0
7 - 8.1
1.74
0
10A
5,382
5
20
6 - 02
24.74
1,370
8.4
0
7 - 7.7
1.95
0
10.4
5,382
5
21
7 - 02
26.604
1,180
1 0
7.2 - 8.4
2.36
0
10.4
5,382
5
20
8 - 02

PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899
FACILITY NAME: Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Moncure
COUNTY: Chatham
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 - 2002
REGION: Raleigh
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE 2 OF 12
00600
00625
00665
31616
32102
34200
34205
34215
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
Y/100ml
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
Nitrogen, Total
(as N)
Nitrogen,
Kieldahl, Total
(as N)
Phosphorus,
Total (as P)
Coliform, Fecal
MF, M-FC
eroth,44.5C
Carbon
Tetrachloride
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Acrylonitrile
9 01
14.55
10
0.675
1
0
0.001
0,001
0.006
10 01
12.35
70
0.62
1
0
0
0.001
0,001
0.006
0
11 01
13.7
10
0.675
1.189207
0
0.001
0.001
0.006
12 01
7.85
70
0.49
1
0
0.001
0.001
0.006
1 - 02
g,7
10
0.35
1
0
0,001
0.001
0.006
2 - 02
5
10
0.275
1
0
0.001
0.001
0.006
3 • 02
5.8
10
0.48
1
0
0.001
0.001
0,006
4 02
6.95
10
0.53
1
0
0.001
0.001
0.006
5 - 02
8.133333
10
1
0
0.001
0.001
0.006
6 - 02
4.95
0
0.675
1
0
0 001
0001
0.006
7-02
6.5
10
1.005
1
0
U.007
0.001
0.006
8 - 02
1U
0
0.001
0.001
0.006

PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899
FACILITY NAME: Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell Intemational Incorporated
CITY: Moncure
COUNTY: Chatham
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 -2002
REGION: Raleigh
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE 3 OF 12
34220
34230
34235
34242
34247
34301
34311
34316
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
1bs/day
lbs/day
Anthracene
Benzo(B)fluorant
Benzene,
Benzo(A)fluorant
Benzo(A)pyrene
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane,
Chloroform,
hene (3,4-Benzo)
Dissolved
hene
Total weight
Dissolved
9 01
0.001
0.002
0.002
0. 001
0.002
0.001
0.007
0.001
10 - of
"� 001
0. 00<
0,002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.007
0,001
0
0
0
11 - 01
0-00 !
` ""_
0.002
0.0(l1
0.002
0.001
0.007
0.001
12 - 01
0,001
0.002
0 007
0 002
0.001
0.007
0.001
1-- 02
0.001
1) 00Z
0.002
0 00 r
_
0.001
0.007
0.001
2. 02
0.001
0.002
0.002
0,001
0 002
0.001
0 007
0.001
3 - 02
0,001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0. 00L
0.001
0.007
0.001
' 4 - 02
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0. 001
1 1 1 1. ,
0.001
5 - 02
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
,% JO:J
0.001
0.007
am
5 - 02
0.001
_ - _
0.002
0 001
0.001
0.007
0.001
7 02
0.001
0.002
0.00E
0.001
0.001
0.001
8-02
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
,
0.001
J 007
1

PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899 PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 - 2002 DMR 12 Month Calculated
FACILITY NAME: Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Moncure COUNTY: Chatham REGION: Raleigh
PAGE d OF 12
34320
34336
34341
34371
34376
34381
34396
34418
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
Chrysene
Diethyl
Dimethyl
Ethylbenzene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachloroethane
Methyl Chloride
Phthalate
Phthalate
0.001
0.005
0.001
0.002
0.002
j n� i 1
0.001
0.006
9 - 01
0.001
0.005
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
a006
0
0
0.001
0.005
0.001
0.002
0.00�
0001
0.001
0.006
11 - 01
o oo l
0.005
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.006
12 01
0.001
0.007
t t
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.006
1 02
0-001
0.005
0.001
0.002
0
0-001
0.001
0.006
2 02
0.001
0.006
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.006
3-02
0.001
0.005
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.006
1-02
0.001
0.005
J 01) 1
0.002
< 0.
� n11
0.001
0.006
5.02
0.001
00,
0.002
0.001
0.U01
0
6.02
0.001
0.005
0.001
0.002
��. ii�/,._
, ..
0.001
,... .
7 - 02
0.001
0.005
0C I
0.002
J..
...
0.001
..
8-02

•
PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899
FACILITY NAME: Honeywell International hic - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Moncure
COUNTY: Chatham
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 -2002
REGION: Raleigh
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE 5 OF 12
34423
34447
34461
34469
34475
34481
34485
34496
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lba/day
ibs/day
Methylene
Nitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Tetrachloroethyl
Toluene,
Trichloroethylen
1,1-dichloroetha
Chloride
me
Dissolved
e, Dissolved
ne
9 - 01
0.003
0.0of
0 001
0-002
0.001
O.o02
0.001
0.001
0.003
0. 00£
0 001
0.002
0.001
000,
0,001
0.001
10 - 01
0
0
0
0
0.005
0.002
0 001
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
11 01
0003
0.002
0,001
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0,001
12 - Ol
0.003
0.002
0,001
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
02
0.003
0.002
0,001
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
2 - 02
0.003
0 002
0.001
am
0.001
0.002
0,001
0.001
3 - 02
0.003
0.002
0 001
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
4 - 02
0.005
0.002
0.001
0,002
0.001
0.0022
0 oo l
0.001
5 - 02
0 005
0.002
0.001
0,002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
6 - 02
0.003
0-002
0001
0,002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
7 - 02
0. 003
0.002
0 001
0. 002
0 001
0.002
0.001
0. 001
8 02

0
PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899
FACILITY NAME: Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Mnncure
COUNTY: Chatham
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 - 2002
REGION: Raleigh
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE 6 OF12
34501
34506
34511
34526
34531
34536
34541
74546
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
1,1-dichloroethy
1,1,1-trichloro-
1,1,2-trichloro-
eenzo(A)anthrace
1,2-dichloroetha
1,2-dichlorobenz
1,2-dichloroDroB
1,2-trans-dichlo
ro- ethylene
lene
ethane
ethane
ne
ne, Total Weight
ene
ane
0,001
0 001
0 001
0.001
0.005
0-005
0.01
0.001
9 01
0.001
0.001
0 001
0.001
0.005
0.005
0.01
0,001
10 - 01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,001
0.001
000,
0,001
0.005
0,005
0.01
0.001
11 01
0.001
0.001
0.001
owl
0.005
0 005
0-01
0.001
12 01
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.005
0.005
0.01
0.001
1 02
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.005
0.005
0.01
0.001
2 02
0.001
0 007
0.001
0.001
U.005
0.005
0.01
0-001
3 - 02
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.005
O0C;5
0.01
0-001
4 - 02
0,001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.005
0.005
0.01
0.001
5 - 02
0.001
0.001
0.001
0,001
0.005
0.005
0.01
0.001
6 - 02
0,001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.005
0.005
0.01
0.001
E_02
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0. 005
0.005
0.01
0,001

•
PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899
FACILITY NAME: Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Moncure
COUNTY: Chatham
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 - 2002
REGION: Raleigh
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE 7 OF12
34551
34561
34566
34571
34586
36591
34601
34606
lbe/day
lbs/day
lba/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbe/day
lba/day
1.2,4-trichloro-
1,3-dicbloroDroD
1,3-dichlorobanz
l,G-dichlorobenz
2-chloroyhenol
2-nitrophenol
2,4-dichloroDhen
2,4-dimethylBhen
benzene
ene, Total
ene
ene
of
of
Weight
0.002
0.00.
0.001
0.002
0.003
0. 003
0.001
9-Ot
0-005
0.002
0.002
0.00i
0.002
0.003
0,003
am
10 - 01
0
0
0
0.005
0.002
0,00
0DD1
0.002
0.003
0.003
0.001
11-01
0.005
0.002
0,0022
0. 001
0.002
0.003
0.005
am
12 - 01
0.dOo
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.003
0.001
1 02
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.003
0.001
2-02
0.005
000Z
0.002
0.001
0.00Z
am
0.003
0.001
3 - 02
0.005
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.0022
0.003
0.003
am
4 02
0.005
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.003
!i'.-
0.001
5 - 02
U.005
0.002
0.002
r1 aU 1
0.002
0011_
0.003
0.001
6-02
0.005
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.003
0-005
0.001
7 02
0,005
0.002
0.002
lui11
0.002
0.003
0.00.5
0.001
8 02

PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899
FACILITY NAME: Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Moncure
COUNTY: Chatham
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 - 2002
REGION: Raleigh
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE 8 OF 12
34611
34616
34626
34646
34657
34694
34696
39100
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
2,4-dinitrotolue
2.4-dinitropheno
2,6-dinitrotalue
4-nitrophenol
4,6-dinitro-o-cr
Phenol, Single
Naphthalene
Bis
1
ne
esol
Compound
(2-Ethylhexyl)
ne
Phthalate
0,008
0.005
0.017
0.005
0.005
0-001
0,001
0.007
9 01
0, 008
0.005
0.017
0,005
0.005
0.001
0.001
0.007
10 - Ol
0
0,008
0.005
0.017
0.005
0.005
0.001
0.001
0.007
11 01
0.008
0.005
0,017
0,005
0.005
0.001
0.001
0.007
12 01
0.008
0.005
0.017
0.005
0.005
0.001
0.001
0.007
1 02
0 008
0 005
0.017
0.005
0.005
0 001
0,001
0.007
2 02
0 006
0.005
0,017
0.005
0.005
0 001
0.001
0.007
3 - 02
0.008
0.005
0,017
0.005
a005
0,001
0.001
a007
4 02
0,008
O. 005
0.017
0,005
0.005
0.001
0,001
0,007
5.02
0.008
0.005
0.017
0.005
0.005
0.001
0,001
0.007
6 - 02
0.006
0,005
0.017
0,006
0.005
0. 001
0.001
0.007
7 - 02
0.006
0 o05
0.017
0 005
0,005
0 001
0.001
0.007
8 02

CJ
PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899
FACILITY NAME: Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Moncure
COUNTY: Chatham
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 - 2002
REGION: Raleigh
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE 9 OF 12
39110
39175
39700
39702
50050
50060
TAA35
TAA3D
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
mpd
W/l
percent
percent
Di-n-Butyl
Vinyl Chloride
Hexachlorobenzen
Hexachlorobutadi
Plow, in
Chlorine, Total
LC50 STAT 48hr
LC50 STAT 48hr
Phthalate
a
ene
conduit or thru
Residual
ACU Ceriodaphnia
ACU D. PULEX
treatment plant
0.0022
0.007
0.001
0.001
0.244
9 - 01
0.0903
0.551
0.002
0.007
0.001
0.001
0.244
10 - 01
0
0
0.0946
0.572
100
100
0 002
0.007
0-001
0,001
0.244
11 - 01
0.080115
0.586538
0 00-
0 U07
0 00 r
0,001
0 244
12 - O1
0.083167
0.555417
0.002
0.007
0.001
0.001
0244
] 02
0.091258
0.620667
100
100
0.002
0.007
0.001
0.001
0.244
2 - 02
0.088143
0.520741
0.002
0.007
0,001
0.001
0.244
3 - 02
0.073806
0.439355
0.002
0.007
0.001
0.001
0.244
4 - 02
0.079333
0.421333
100
100
0.002
0.007
0.001
0,001
0.244
5 - 02
0.061581
0.413871
0.002
0 007
0.001
0.001
0.244
6 - 02
0.111267
0.415333
0.00-
0.007
0.001
0.001
0^44
7 - 02
0.086323
0.469355
l00_
0 007
0 001
0.001
0-�'44
78- 02

PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899 PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 - 2002 DMR 12 Month Calculated
FACILITY NAME: Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Moncure COUNTY: Chatham REGION: Raleigh
OUTFALL:002 EFFLUENT
PAGE 10 OF 12
00010
00400
00951
01092
01092
50050
50060
TAE6C
deg c
su
mg/1
lbs/day
mg/1
mgd
mg/l
percent
Temperature,
pH
Fluoride, Total
Zinc, Total (as
Zinc. Total (as
F1oW, in
Chlorine, Total
LC50 STAT 24hr
Water Deg.
(as F)
Zn)
Zn)
conduit or thru
Residual
ACU Pimephales
Centigrade
treatment plant
05
9.01
20.5
6.9 - 7.2
0.039
u5
10.01
16.75
6.9 - 7.2
0.38
0.002
0.0262
0.5
11' 01
13.5
0.0445
0.5
12•- 01
12.5
0.1125
0.5
1 - 02
9.4
7.1 - 7.9
0.16
0.022
0.3478
0.5
2-02
11.175
7 7.8
0.122
0.5
3-02
14.325
7 7.9
0.093
0.5
4-02
21.55
0.15
0
0.100333
100
(1.5
5-02
22.44
6.8 - 7.3
0.0202
6-02'
26.35
6.6 - 7
0.0075
o�
7-02
27.275
6.7 - 7
0.086
0.5
8-02

CI
PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899
FACILITY NAME: Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
OUTFALL:003 EFFLUENT
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 -2002
REGION: Raleigh
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE I I OF 12
00010
00310
00310
00340
00000
00530
00556
00600
deg c
lbs/day
mg/1
lbs/day
su
lbs/day
lbs/day
mg/1
Temperature,
BOD, 5-Day (20
BOD, 5-Day (20
COD, Oxygen
pH
Solids, Total
Oil 6 Grease
Nitrogen, Total
Water Deg.
Deg. C)
Deg. CI
Demand, Chem.
Suspended
(as N)
Centigrade
(High Level)
355
355
5,382
239
20
9 - 01
359
355
5,382
239
20
10 - 01
359
355
5,382
235
20
11 01
355
355
5,382
235
20
12 01
'
355
355
5,382
239
20
1 02
355
355
5,382
2:75
2 02
355
355
5,382
�35
'0
3-02
355
355
5,382
239
20
4 - 02
355
355
5,382
235
20
5-02
355
355
5,382
23S
20
6-02
359
359
5,382
"35
20
7 - 02
355
355
5,382
='•75
20
8.02

PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899
FACILITY NAME: Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Moncure
COUNTY: Chatham
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 -2002
REGION: Raleigh
00625
00665
31616
50050
50060
lba/day
mg/1
Y/100m1
mgd
ug/1
Nitrogen,
Phosphorus.
Colitorm, Fecal
Flow, in
Chlorine, Total
Kieldahl, Total
Total (as PI
MF, M-FC
conduit or thru
Residual
(as N)
Broth.44.5C
treatment plant
%)
0.244
9 - 01
10
0.244
10 - 01
70
0.244
11 - 01
10
0.244
12 - 01
10
0.244
1 02
10
0,244
2 - 02
10
0.244
3 - 02
10
0,244
4 - 02
0
0 z44
5 - 02
70
0 24 4
6 - 02
10
0.244
7 - 02
10
0.244
8 - 02
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE 12 OF 12

PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899
FACILITY NAME: Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
OUTFALL:001 EFFLUENT
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 - 2001
REGION: Raleigh
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE I OF 12
00010
00095
00300
00310
00340
00400
00530
00556
deg c
umhos/cm
mg/l
lbs/day
lbs/day
su
lbs/day
lbs/day
Temperature,
Specific
DO, Oxygen,
SOD, 5-Day (20
COD, Oxygen
pH
Solids, Total
Oil 6 Grease
Water Deg.
Conductance
Dissolved
Deg. CI
Demand, Chem.
Suspended
Centigrade
(High 6eve1)
10.4
5, 382
5
20
9 - 00
23.1
1,200
5.96
0.52
7.2 - 7.8
3
1.325
10.4
5,382
5
20
10 - 00
18.72
1,160
7.22
0
7.3 - 7.7
0.7
0
10.4
5,382
5
20
11 - 00
14.2
9.13
0
7.4.8
1.6
0.82
10.4
5,382
5
20
12 - 00
9.72
1,440
10.45
0
7.3 - 8.5
3.3
0
10.4
5,382
5
20
1 - 01
9.36
1,790
10.79
0
7.7 - 8.4
1.7
0
70.4
5,382
5
20
L01
12.21
1,330
10.45
21 Violation
7.3 - 8
1.6
0
10.4
5, 382
5
20
3 - 01
13.04
1,050
9.93
0.7
7.2 - 8.2
0
0
10.4
5, 382"
5
20
4 • Ol
17.9
860
7.92
0
7.2 - 8.1
620 Violation
0
104
5 - 01
20.9
1,500
8.02
0
7.3 - 7.7
0
0
10.4
6 - 01
25
1,280
6.72
0.77
7.2 - 7.7
1.1
5.5
10.4
5, 382
5
20
7 - 01
26
1,030
6.78
0
7.5 - 8.4
645.5 Violation
0
104
5, 382
5
20
8• O l
26.34
944
6.2
0
6.9 - 7.8
0
0

s
PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899
FACILITY NAME: Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Mnncure
COUNTY: Chatham
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 -2001
REGION: Raleigh
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE 2 OF 12
00600
00625
00665
31616
32102
34200
34205
34215
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
Y/100ml
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
Nitrogen, Total
(as N)
Nitrogen,
Kjeldahl, Total
Phosphorus,
Total (as PI
Coliform, Fecal
MF, M-FC
Carbon
Tetrachloride
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Acrylonitrile
(as NI
Broth,44.5C
9 - 00
12,3
1(
0.6
0
G
0,001
0.001
0,006
0
0-001
0.001
0,006
10 - 00
8,2
0.455
0
11 - 00
12.3
10
0.595
1
G
0.001
0,001
0.006
12 - 00
12.3
10
1.035
0
0
0.001
0.001
0.006
1 - 01
17.15
10
0.64
0
a
0.001
0.001
0.006
2 01
8.55
10
0.265
0
0
0.001
0.001
0,006
3 - 01
9.05
10
0.095
3.4
0
0.001
0.001
0.006
4 - Ol
9.6
10
0.34
0
0
0.001
0,001
0.006
5 - 01
13.8
10
0.405
1.1
0
0.001
0.001
0.006
6 - 01
11.5
10
0.345
1.3
G
0.001
0.001
G.006
7 - 01
12.85
16
1.67
1
0
0 001
0-001
0.006
7,3
0.49
0
0
0-001
0.001
0.006

PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899 PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 - 2001 DMR 12 Month Calculated
FACILITY NAME: Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Moncure COUNTY: Chatham REGION: Raleigh
PAGE 3 OF 12
34220
34230
34235
34242
34247
34301
34311
34316
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
Anthracene
Benzo(B)fluorant
Benzene,
Benzo(K)fluorant
Benzo(A)pyrene
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane,
chloroform,
hene 13.4-Benzo)
Dissolved
hene
Total Weight
Dissolved
0 00 1
0. 00f
0.002
o X 1
0, 002
0 001
0.007
0.001
9-00
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.007
0.001
10 - 00
0.001
0.002
0. 002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.007
0.001
11 - 00
0.001
0.002
0. 00f
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.007
0.001
12 - 00
0.001
0,002
0,002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.007
0,001
1 01
0,001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0, 002
0.001
0.007
0.001
2 - 01
0 001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.007
0.001
3 - 01
0 007
0.i)02
0. 00f
0-001
0.002
0,001
0.007
a001
4 - 01
0-J01
0-002
0 00�
lL 001
0,00f
0.do 1
0.007
0-001
5 - 01
0.0o 1
0.002
0.002
0 001
0.002
0.001
0.007
0.001
6 01
0.001
0-002
0-00L
u:si1
0,002
0-001
0.007
0.001
7-01
0001
0.002
0,00_
ni,II
0.00f
0.001
0.007
0.001
8 Ol

r
L
PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899 PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 - 2001 DMR 12 Month Calculated
FACILITY NAME: Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Moncure
COUNTY: Chatham
REGION: Raleigh
PAGE d OF 12
34320
34336
34341
34371
34376
34381
34396
34418
lbe/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
Chrysene
Diethyl
Dimethyl
Ethylbenzene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Eexachloroethane
Methyl Chloride
Phthalate
Phthalate
0.001
0.005
0.001
0.002
0. 002
0.001
0.001
0.006
9 00
0.001
0.005
0 001
0.002
0 00-
0.001
0.001
0.006
0 00
0.001
0. 0,
C,..
0.002
0
0.001
0.001
0.006
11 - 00
0.001
0.005
i! O0:
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.006
12 - 00
0.001
0.005
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.006
1 01
0.001
0.005
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.006
2 01
0.001
0.005
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.006
3 - 01
0-001
0.005
0.001
0.002
0-002
0.001
0-001
0.006
4 - 01
0.001
0005
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.006
5.01
0.001
0 005
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
6 - 01
0.001
d. 005
0.001
0.002
002
0.001
0.001
0.006
7-01
0.00-
0. 002
0.001
0.001
0.006
8-01

C , i
PERMIT NUMBER: NCODO1899 PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 - 2001 DMR 12 Month Calculated
FACILITY NAME: Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Moncure COUNTY: Chatham REGION: Raleigh
PAGE 5 OF I?
34423
34447
34461
34469
34475
34481
34485
34496
lbe/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
Methylene
Nitrobenzene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Tetrachloroethyl
Toluene,
Trichloroethylen
1,1-dichloroetha
Chloride
ene
Dissolved
e• Dissolved
ne
0.003
0.00<
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
9 - 00
0.003
n.0 -
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
10 - 00
"-�
�.
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.002
:, no 1
0.001
11 - 00
_
0,001
0.001
0.002
0.001
12-00
0.003
0.007
0.002
0.001
0.00P
..r
0.001
1 - 01
0.003
.. ._
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
2 01
0.005
0. 002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.002
0,001
0.001
3 - 01
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
• 4 - 01
L7. 003
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.002
0,001
0.001
5 - 01
0.00.,
- ...
0.001
0.002
attoi
0.00.
0.001
6 - 01
0. 005
....
0.001
1 .
am
0.002
, ,
0.001
7 - 01
0.0Ub
0.001
0.00c
0,001
0.002
0.001
,.
8 - 01

PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899 PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 - 2001 DMR 12 Month Calculated
FACILITY NAME: Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Moncure
COUNTY: Chatham
REGION: Raleigh
PAGE 6 OF12
34501
34506
34511
34526
34531
34536
34541
34546
lbs/day
lba/day
lbs/day
lb6/day
lba/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbe/day
1,1-dichloroethy
1,1,1-trichloro-
1,1,2-trichloro-
Benzo(A)anthrace
1,2-dichloroetha
1,2-dichlorobenz
1,2-dichloroprop
1,2-trans-dichlo
lene
ethane
ethane
ne
ne, Total Weight
ene
ane
ro- ethylene
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.006
0.005
0.01
0.001
9 - 00
0.001
0,001
0 007
0.001
0.005
0.005
0,01
0.001
0 - 00
0.001
0 001
0.001
0.001
0.005
0.005
0.01
0.001
1 1 - 00
0.001
0.001
0 001
0,001
0.005
0,005
0,01
0,001
12 - 00
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0,005
0.005
0.01
0.001
1 01
0,001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.005
0,005
0.01
0.001
2 01
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.005
0.005
0.01
0.001
3 - 01
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.005
0.005
0.01
0.001
4 - Ol
0. 001
0.001
0.001
0,001
0005
0.005
0.01
0.001
5 - Ol
0.001
0. 001
0.001
0.001
0,005
0.005
0,01
0.00 I
6 - Ol
0 001
0 001
0. 001
0.001
0, 005
0.005
0,01
0 001
7 01
0 00 1
0-001
1)_001
0.001
0005
0,005
0-01
0.001
8 - Ol

PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899
FACILITY NAME, Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Moncure
COUNTY: Chatham
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 - 2001
REGION: Raleigh
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE 7 OF12
34551
34561
34566
34571
34586
34591
34601
34606
lba/day
lbs/day
lba/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
1,2,4-trichloro-
1,3-dichloropcop
1,3-dichlorobenz
1,4-dichlorobenz
2-Chlorophenol
2-nitroDhenol
2,4-dichlorophen
2,4-dimethylphen
benzene
ene, Total
ene
ene
of
of
Weight
0.005
0.002 -
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.003
0.001
9 - 00
0.005
0.002
0. 00e
0.001
0,002
0,003
0.003
0.001
10 - 00
0 005
0.002
0.002
0. 001
0. U0-
0D03
0.003
0.001
11 - 00
0.005
0.002
0.002
0.001
0, 00Z
0.005
0.003
0.001
12 - 00
0.005
0.002
0.002
0.001
0, 002
0.003
0.003
0.001
1 - 01
0,005
0,002
0,002
0.001
0-002
0,005
0.003
0.001
2 01
0.005
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.003
0.001
3 - 01
0.005
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.003
0,003
0.001
4 - 01
0.005
0.002
0.002
0.001
0-002
0.003
0.003
0.001
5 - 01
ao05
0.002
o ao-
0 u01
n.our
0.00J
0.005
0,001
6 - 01
0.005
0.002
0.00ti
0 1101
0-00_
0.003
0.00E
0.001
7 - 01
L1005
0.002
0. 00
U.i7U1
n 0Uz
0 Uo3
0.003
0.001
8 - 01

PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899
FACILITY NAME: Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Moncure
COUNTY: Chatham
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 -2001
REGION: Raleigh
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE 8 OF 12
34611
34616
34626
34646
34657
34694
34696
39100
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
2.4-dinitrotolue
2.4-dinitropheno
2,6-dinitrotolue
4-nitrophenol
4,6-dinitro-o-cr
Phenol, Single
Naphthalene
Bis
1
ne
esol
Compound
(2-Ethylhexyl)
ne
Phthalate
0008
0,005
0017
0,005
0,005
0001
0.001
0.007
9-00
0.008
0.005
0,017
0.005
0.005
0,001
0,001
0,007
10 - 00
0,008
0,005
0.017
0.005
0.005
0.001
0.001
0.007
11 -00
0.008
0.005
0.017
0.005
0.005
0.001
0.001
0,007
12 - 00
0.006
0.005
0,017
0.005
0.005
0.001
0.001
0.007
i 01
0.008
0.005
0.017
0,005
0.005
0.001
0.001
0.007
2 01
0.008
0.005
0.017
0.005
0.005
0.001
0.001
0.007
3 - 01
0,008
0,005
0.017
0.005
0-005
0,001
0.001
0.007
4 - 01
0 008
0 005
0.017
0.005
0.005
0-001
0.001
0,007
5 - 01
0.008
0.005
0 017
000
0.005
0.001
0.001
0.007
6 - 01
0.006
0.005
0.017
0-005
0,005
0.001
0,001
0.007
7 01
0-008
0-005
0.017
0,005
0,005
0-001
0.001
0.007
8 - 01

•
PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899
FACILITY NAME. Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Mnnrure
COUNTY: Chatham
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 -2001
REGION: Raleigh
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE 9 OF l2
39110
39175
39700
39702
50050
50060
TAA3B
TAA3D
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
lbs/day
Md
M/1
percent
percent
Di-n-Butyl
Vinyl Chloride
Hezachlorobenzen
Hexachlorobucadi
Flow, in
Chlorine, Total
LC50 STAT 48hr
LC50 STAT 48hr
ene
conduit or thru
Residual
ACU Ceriodaphnia
ACU D. PULEX
Phthalate
a
treatment plant
0.002
0,007
0,001
0.001
0.244
9 - 00
0.1008
1.078
0.002
0.007
0.001
0.001
0.244
t 0 - 00
0.0786
0.959
100
100
0.002
0.007
0.001
0,001
0.244
11 - 00
0.0743
0.869
0,002
0.007
0.001
0.001
0,244
12 • 00
0.0754
0.95
0.002
0.007
0.001
0.001
0.244
.1 - 01
0.0813
1
0
0
0-002
0.007
0,001
0.001
0.244
F1.256
Z - 01
0.0968
0
0
0 002
0-007
0 001
0 001
o 244
3- 01
0,1029
0.605
100
100
0.002
0-007
00u1
0001
0244
4.01
0.0933
0,499
100
100
0.002
0.007
0.001
0.001
0,244
5 • 01
0.0833
0.491
0 00`
0,007
0 ooi
0.001
0.244
6 - Ol
0.1018
0.414
0-002
0, 007
0.0o l
0.001
0.244
7 • 01
0.1164
0.523
100
100
0-00<
0.007
0,001
0,001
0 244
8 01
0.1133
0.514

PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899
FACILITY NAME: Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
r11 ITFAI L An) FFFLUENT
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 - 2001
REGION: Raleigh
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE l0 OF 12
00010
00400
00951
01092
01092
50050
50060
TAE6C
deg c
su
mg/1
lbs/day
mg/1
mgd
mg/1
percent
Fluoride, Total
Zinc, Total (as
Zinc, Total (as
Flow, in
Chlorine. Total
LC50 STAT 24hr
Temperature,
pH
(as F)
Zn)
Zn)
conduit or thru
Residual
ACU Pimephales
Water Deg.
treatment plant
Centigrade
0.5
9-00
0.0917
20.5
6.8 - 7.8
0.5
10 - 00
18.25
6.7-7.5
0
0
0.0996
0.5
11 - 00
0.1434
12
6.9 - 7.6
0.5
12 - 00
0,1087
9.5
7.7 - 8.2
0.5
1 - 01
7
7.2 - 8.4
0.24
0.022
0.1118
05
2 - 01
0.0315
10.5
7 - 7.5
0.5
3 - 01
0.1235
11.25
7 - 7.9
0.5
4 - 01
16
7.2-7.4
0
0.022
0.1046
100
0.5
5 - 01
0.134
20.4
6.9 - 7.6
0.5
6 - 01
0.074
24.5
6.8 - 7.1
0.5
7 - 01
24.5
7.1 - 7.3
0.28
0.009
0.046
U.5
8 - 01
0.028
23.4
6.9 - 7.1

PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899
FACILITY NAME: Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
OUTFALL:003 EFFLUENT
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 - 2001
REGION: Raleigh
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE I I OF 12
00010
00310
00310
00340
00400
00530
00556
00600
lbs/day
mg/l
lbs/day
su
lbs/day
lbs/day
mg/l
deg c
BOD, 5-Day (20
HOD, 5-Day 120
COD, Oxygen
pH
Solids, Total
Oil i Grease
Nitrogen, Total
Temperature,
Demand, Chem.
Suspended
(as N)
Water Deg.
Deg. C)
Deg. C)
Centigrade
(High Level)
359
359
5.382
235
20
9 - 00
355
355
5,382
23.9
20
10-00
-
3 ,5
5.382
239
_0
11 - 00
359
355
5,382
235
20
12-00
359
359
5,382
235
20
1 - Ol
359
359
5,382
239
20
2-01
359
355
5.382
239
20
3.01
359
355
5,382
235
20
4 01
355
5,3K�
2:#.
20
5-Ot
6.01
7.01
35F
355
5,aN2
239
20
8-01

PERMIT NUMBER: NC0001899
FACILITY NAME. Honeywell International Inc - Honeywell International Incorporated
CITY: Moncure
COUNTY: Chatham
PERIOD ENDING MONTH: 8 -2001
REGION: Raleigh
00625
00665
11616
50050
50060
lbs/day
mg/1
4/100ml
mgd
ug/1
Nitrogen,
Phosphorus.
Coliform, Fecal
Flow, in
Chlorine, Total
Rjeldahl, Total
Total (as P)
NF, N-FC
conduit or thru
Residual
(as N)
Broth,44.5C
treatment plant
10
0.244
9-00
0
0.244
10.00
0
0.244
11-00
0
0.244
12-00
10
0,244
0
0.244
2-01
0
0.244
3.01
0
0.244
4.01
10
0.244
5-Ot
0
0.244
6-01
0
0.244
7-01
0
0 '44
8.01
DMR 12 Month Calculated
PAGE 12 OF 12

Honeywell
Performance Polymers
Honeywell
P.O. Box 166
338 Pea Ridge Road
Moncure, NC 27559
919 542-2200
919 542-1258 Fax
October 15, 2002
Ms. Judy Garrett
Division of Water Quality
Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
1634 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1634
Dear Ms. Garrett:
OCT 2 3 2002
Attached is the Sewage Spill Response Evaluation form. This form is being sent in response to the lift station
overflow at Honeywell's Moncure, North Carolina facility (Permit No. NC0001899) on Friday October 11,
2002. Per the Collection System Enforcement Guidance document, the Division of Water Quality was notified
of the overflow Immediately by telephone and the SSRE was completed and is being forwarded to you for
further evaluation of this incident.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact me at [phone].
'ncerely, _
J nifer L. O rc h
En men I En Ineer/ORC (Certificate No. 27789)
Attachments: Sewage Spill Response Evaluation Form
cc: S. D. Shelton
W. L. Boyer
M. M. Borchers

0
Sewage Spill Response Evalon:
(Page 1 of 2)
Permittee Honeywell International Inc. Permit Number NC0001899 County Chatham r
Incident Ended: (Date/Time) 10/11/02 / 11:40 AM Estimated Duration (Time) 30 Mirt _ Axop
�I
I I—`
First knowledge of incident: (Date/Time) 10/11/02 / 10:40 AM f1�Y 2 3 �(1(li
Estimated volume of spill/bypass < 15 -gallons. Show rational for volume.
Water level was reported as being up to and barely flowing over the concrete of the parshall flume at the
lift station. There were no solids or discoloration in the storm water collecting around the lift station.
if spill is ongoing, please notify Regional Office on a daily basis until spill can be stopped.
Reported to: Ms. Judy Garrett (Date/time) 10/11/01 / 11:45 AM
Name of person
Weather conditions: Steady rainfall most of the night with increased intensity from approximately 9:00 AM
to 11:00 AM. Almost 4 inches of rainfall (3.91 recorded from 7:30 AM to 2 PM on 10/11/02.
Source of spill/bypass (check one): _Sanitary Sewer X Pump Station WWTP
Level of treatment (check one): X None _Primary Treatment
Secondary Treatment Chlorination Only
Did spill/bypass reach surface waters? X. Yes No (If Yes, please list the following)
'Stormwater from the area adjacent to the lift station flows south through NPDES outall 002.
Volume reaching surface waters? <15 gallons
Name of surface water Shaddox Creek
Did spill/bypass result in a fish kill? _Yes X No
If Yes, what is the estimated number of fish killed?
Please provide the following information:
1. Location of spill/bypass: Wastewater influent at the lift station reached the top of the concrete wall of
the parshall flume and comminutor. At 10:40 AM the operator observed influent barelv flowino over the
wall into adiacent stormwater. No solids or discolored water was observed next to the lift station.
2. Cause of spill/bypass: Very heave rainfall over a short period of time caused excessive flow to the lift
station. Rainwater from some chemical handling areas is routinely directed to the wastewater treatment
plant. The lift station had not typically had any problem handling the additional hydraulic load from these
areas of the plant site. The four sump pumps were operating, but weren't able to keep up with the
stormwater flow.
3. Did you have personnel available to perform initial assessment 24 hours/day (including weekends and
holidays)?
X Yes —No
4. How long did it take to make an initial assessment of the spill/overflow after first knowledge?
Hours < 10 Minutes
How long did it take to get a repair crew onsite?
Hours Minutes
Please explain the time taken to make initial assessment: Overflow was reported to the Utilities Foreman
as soon as it was detected.

Sewage Spill Response Evaln:
(Page 2 of 2)
Permittee Honeywell International Inc. Permit Number NC0001899 County Chatham
5. Action taken to contain spill, clean up waste, and/or remediate the site: Honeywell phoned a local
6. Were the equipment and parts needed to make repairs readily available?
Yes No _ If no, please explain why: No repairs were required.
7. If the spill/overflow occurred at a pump station, or was the result of a pump station failure,
was the alarm system functional at the time of the spill? Yes No If the alarm
system did not function, please explain why: Currently, there is no high level alarm system at the lift
station. Operators routinely inspect the lift station every four hours and more frequently during rainfall
events. The facility will investigate the benefits of installing a local high level alarm for the lift station.
8. Repairs made are: Permanent Temporary
Please describe what repairs were made. If the repairs are temporary, please indicate a date by
which permanent repairs will be completed, and notify the Regional Office within 7 days of the
permanent repair: No repairs were required.
9. What actions have been made to prevent this discharge from occurring again in the future?
Ensure all lift station pumps are functioning properly to maintain full pipe condition. As well as having a
truck readily available to assist with hydraulic loading during foreseen heavy rainfall events.
10. Comments:
Other agencies notifed: None
Person
For DWQ Us"nly: '
DWQ requested additional written report?
If yes, what additional information is needed?
Requested by
Phone Number: [phone]
Yes No
Date: 10/14/2002

State *,(%rth Carolina
Depa If Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional office
RCDENR
Michael F. Easley, Governor NOR c„„D N oEPARTMENTQF
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Dir"l[SION OF WATER QUALITY
September 17, 2002
Ms. Elin Gabriel, Plant Manager
Honeywell International, Inc.
P.O. Box 166
Moncure, NC 27559
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
1)Honeywell WWTP
NPDES Permit NC0001899
2)Honeywell Stormwater
NPDES Permit No. NCS000100
Chatham County
Dear Ms. Gabriel:
I inspected the Honeywell facility on June 6, 2002. Bill Boyer and Jennifer Overcash
represented Honeywell during the inspection. Their assistance is appreciated. Findings during
the inspections were as follows:
NC0001899, Pipe 001
1) The wastewater treatment plant is permitted for .244 mgd and consists of an influent (process
only) mixing basin where sulfuric acid can be added as needed, a spill pond, a 650,000 gallon
aeration basin with four floating aerators(sanitary wastewater is discharged to center of aeration
basin), clarifier, sludge drying beds, 2 alum ponds for waste from a water treatment plant,
polishing pond, chlorine contact chamber and effluent flowmeter. Mr. Boyer stated that the
manufacturing plant has approximately 610 employees.
2) The influent sampler temperature was 3° C. The effluent sampler was at 15eC. Mr. Boyer
stated that the effluent sampler refrigerator is scheduled for service. Samples were not being
taken or required to be taken on the day of the inspection. The effluent sampler temperature log
indicated that the sampler temperature was 2°C on Tuesday, the last day that effluent composite
samples were taken. The sampler temperature must be maintained at or below 4°C during
sampling.
3) Sludge dried on a drying bed and then is taken to BFI landfill in Virginia.
1620 Mail service Center, galeigh, NC 27699.1628
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone (919) 571A700 FAX [phone]
50 % recycled110% post -consumer paper

Ms. Gabriel
Page 2
4) The daily log sheets were inspected. The ORC signs these log sheets daily. Calibration
records were complete. One month of data was compared to the daily logs and lab sheets. The
number reported by the laboratory for fecal coliform should be reported on the lab sheet as is. It
should not be run through the lbs/day formula. All DMRs for the past 12 months which have
reported fecal coliform incorrectly, should be revised and resubmitted to reflect this correction.
5) The flow meter is calibrated quarterly. This is within the permit requirement.
6) The second of 2 alum ponds which received sludge from the water treatment system, was
nearly full of solids. Mr. Boyer stated that the old pond which currently has large vegetation and
trees growing in it may be cleaned out and returned to service. It is suggested that an
engineering review be completed for this to detennine if the pond berm and any liners will
remain in tact after removal. The flow from these ponds joins the pipe 001 flow at the chlorine
contact chamber.
7) The effluent appeared clear and colorless.
8) A review of the monitoring data submitted for the 12-month period from June 2001 through
May 2002 indicated a violation of the monthly average for TSS in October 2001. This violation
has been addressed through the Divisions enforcement procedures. Please ensure that all the
OCPSF parameters are included in the quarterly reports. Several of the reports in our files lacked
the second page of these parameters. I appreciate Mr. Boyer faxing those to me.
Pipe 002
The effluent appeared clear and free of excess solids or foam.
Stormwater Permit NCS000100
The outfalls were inspected and found to be dry. The data logs appeared to be complete with the
reports submitted to DWQ as required.
Please respond to item number 4 above by submitting revised DMRs by October 18, 2002. If
you have questions, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely, j
9�-h -'o
dy Garrett
Environmental Chemist

Ms. Gabriel
Page 3
•
cc: EPA
Chatham County Health Department

..r..... t^........ .......wn .ype mep•u:w rac lyp
L[AI NI 2i 51 g /^ , _. I IQ L'i I( 12 C.-,: u LI[� t7 A ,9I(.`I _ 201 I
1 L!
Remarks
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating e1 CA Reaerved
57 l r j 1J 69 70 U 71 u 72 u 73 1 7a 751 I I I I I I I So
Section 8: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For industrial users discharging to POTN, also Entry Time/Date Pemut Effective Data I
inc Jude POTW name and NP�O(IES� permit number)] / 6A/U
of Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date I
N C"�1a +� �� 30 ., rc /�/o z 01 C 3 �
Name(s)-ofOn,Site Representative(s)Tde(s)/Phone and -..Fe Numbers) = Other Facility Data
`3 111 pl"" tcf (k)54S-31.5q
1Prn S P DVe'((^QSh
Name, Address of Respansible_OfficialTde/Phons and Fax=Number
EI!n G brI-C Q(� [rr a ��14�iya Ia onmC.•d
1�j4 � a�I` ❑ Yes �I Na
Section-C: Areas Evaluated. During Inspetton (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Row Measurement -
Operations.&
Mmntenance
CSOISSO.(Sewer Overflow)
RecordslReporss -- - -. Self-Monitarinq-P.rogramz :
Sludge.Handlingl0isposal -.
Pollution: Prevention --
-
Facility Site Review -.= Compliance Schedules --•
Pretreatment-
Multimedia -
E".tuem/Recaiving Wavers'=' _ - Laboratoryae'•^.._- -r
Storm Water -� _
Other-=; •: -
Section D: Summary of Findings/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checkilsts as necessary)
r
i
Namaisi and Signature(s) of Insceptnr(s)
Signature ok�
Agency/Officmrhens end Fax IN 1igacS1lr `L�Ov Date
" 'lI14
Y
ens®
ins baotate ♦ ,+�. 4Y� :L% jLr°� `

Performance Polymers
Honeywell
P.O. Box 166
338 Pea Ridge Road
Moncure, NC 27559
919 542-2200
919 542-1258 Fax
r
September 10, 2002
0
N
Mr. Dwight Lancaster, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
NC Water Pollution Control System
Operators Certification Commission
1618 Mad Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1618
Dear Mr. Lancaster:
This letter is to notify the Operators Certification Commission of a change in the Operator In Responsible Charge
(ORC) of the wastewater treatment system at Honeywell International's facility in Moncure, Chatham County, NC
(NPDES Permit No. NC0001899). Ms. Jennifer LeAnn Overcash (certificate # 27789) is the new ORC of the
wastewater treatment system and Mr. Larry D. Murray (certificate # 25810) is the Back-up Operator.
Enclosed is a completed notification of change in ORC and Back-up Operator. Please note this change in the
records for this facility.
Please call me if you have any questions at [phone].
Sincerely,
lZ_�. �I�/Sx
W. L. Boyer, REM
Leader Environmental & Industrial Hygiene
Enclosure
cc: Ms. Judy Garrett
Environmental Chemist II
Division of Water Quality
NCDENR
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
M. M. Borchers

L-stir ..:i LrJ.11I
Water Pollution Control System Designation r'orm
WPCSOCC
NCAC 15A:086.0201
General Information:
Pernuttee Owner/Officer Name: Blin E. Gabriel Plant Manage* _-
Mailing Address: r u Boa ioo
City: Moncure Stag: KC Zip _27559
Telephone Number: ( 919 )
Sim ;,nir,-
...,....................................................................
Facility Information:
Facility: Honeywell International Inc.
Permit Number: EC0001899 County: Chatham
SUBNHT A SEPARATE FORNI FOR EACH TYPE OF SYSTEW
Marl (Xt-Iype .if Facility Clair (I —4)
Wastewater Plant B
PhysicaVChemical _
Collection System
Clasp
Spray Irrigation N/A
Land Application N/A
Subsurface 1I/A
.......... .......... .......... ..............................
........---
Operator in Responsible Charge
Print Name: Jennifpr r "nn Overeaab— Social Security #
Biological Water Pollution
Certificate Type and Grade: Control System Operator Certificate #zgg
ra e
work Telephone: ( 919 ) 545-3143 Signature.
.......................................... ..........................
Back -Up Operator in Responsible Charge:
Print Name: Larry D Murray Social Security # : 740_98or 93
Certificate Type and Grade!
Work Telephone: ( 919 545-3268 Sigt
Mail or Fat to: WPCSOCC
1618 Mail Service Center
Raleigh. N.C. 27699-1618
Far: 919/733-1338
n
Revised 10/2000
09: ntt:'n2 FRI 09:5n [TX RY No 7587) UuuL

The State otI North Carolina
Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
hereby certifies that
Jennifer LeAnn Overcash
has met the requirements for certification established by the Certification Commission
pursuant to Article 3, Chapter 90A, of the North Carolina General Statutes as a
Grade 2 Biological Water Pollution Control System Operator
Cry
iv I I
Chairman, Certification Commission
Certificate Number 27789
Certificate Issued June 26, 2002
10

State of Nortf4krolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCE5
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
CERTIFIED MAIL July 3, 2002
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Elin Gabriel, Plant Manager
Honeywell International, Inc.
P.O. Box 166
Moncure, NC 27559
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil Penalty
for Violations of N.C. General Statute 143-215.1(a)(6)
and NPDES Permit NC0001899
Honeywell International, Inc. WWTP
Case No. LV 02-248
Chatham County
Dear Ms. Gabriel:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount
of $ 1053.07 ($100.00 civil penalty +$ 53.07 enforcement costs) against Honeywell
International, Inc.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: a review has been conducted of the
discharge monitoring report (DMR) submitted by Honeywell International, Inc. for the month of
October 2001. This review has shown the subject facility to be in violation of the discharge
limitations and/or monitoring requirements found in NPDES Permit NC0001899. The violations
which occurred in October 2001 are summarized in Attachment A to this letter.
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that Honeywell International,
Inc. violated conditions or requirements of NPDES Permit NC0001899 and N.C.G.S. 143-
215. 1 (a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in Attachment A. A civil penalty may be assessed in
accordance with the maximums established by N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2) against a person who
violates the terms, conditions or requirements of a permit required by N.C.G.S. 143-215.l(a).
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer Pape

0
Ms. Gabriel
Page 2
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with
authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Kenneth Schuster, Division of Water
Quality Regional Supervisor for the Raleigh Region, hereby make the following civil penalty
assessment against Honeywell International, Inc. :
$ 53.07
For / of the 1 violation of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0001899, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit monthly average effluent limit for
TSS.
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY.
Enforcement costs.
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken into
account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
282. 1 (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health,
or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty:

LLI
Ms. Gabriel
Page 3
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
WA
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the reasonableness
of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for contesting the accuracy of
any of the statements contained in the assessment letter. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a
waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or
legal issues in dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
282. 1 (b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
© the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Ms. Coleen Sullins
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617

4F
Ms. Gabriel
Page 4
Please note that all information presented in support of a request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality will review the
information during a bimonthly enforcement conference and inform you of his decision in the
matter of the remission request. His response will provide details regarding case status,
directions for payment and provision for further appeal of the penalty to
the Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions.
Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider information that was not part of the
original remission request considered by the Director and therefore, it is very important that
you prepare a complete and thorough statement in support of your request for remission.
OR
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must request
an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter
1 SOB of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must file your original
petition with the
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
and
Mail or hand -deliver a copy of the petition to
Mr. Dan Oakley, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to
collect the penalty.

Ms. Gabriel
Page 5
Please be advised that any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new
enforcement action, including an additional penalty. If you have any questions about this
civil penalty assessment, please contact the Water Quality Section staff of the Raleigh
Regional Office at 919-571-4700.
dA 3 Zr�
CJ ( ate) Kenneth Schuster
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Region
Division of Water Quality
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Regional WQ Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments

4F
0
Ms. Gabriel
Page 6
Limit Violations
Attachment A
Honeywell International, Inc., WWTP
Chatham County
October 2001
Monthly Average Limit Violations
Parameter Reported Value Limit
TSS 7.4* 5.0
* = violations that were assessed a civil penalty
Units
lb/day

ft
•
Ms. Gabriel
Page 7
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF CHATHAM
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT )
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST )
PERMIT NO. NC0001899 )
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. )
W WTP )
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV 02-248
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling for violation(s) as set
forth in the assessment document of the Water Quality Regional Supervisor dated
, the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby
waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the
facts are as alleged in the assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all
evidence presented in support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director
of the Division of Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new
evidence in support of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the
notice of assessment.
This the day of 20
-- BY
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
of Environment and Natural Resources
\O��F W AT FRQG
North Carolina Depa
h r
May 6, 2002
5024
Ms. Jennifer Overcash
Honeywell International, Inc.
338 Pea Ridge Road
P.O. Box 166
Moncure, NC 27559
Subject: North Carolina Field Parameter Laboratory Certification
Dear Ms. Overcash:
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
We have received and reviewed the information you provided for North Carolina
Wastewater/Groundwater Field Parameter Environmental Laboratory Certification. Based
on this information, we can proceed with certification as requested. We will issue Field
Parameter Environmental Certification 0he indicated parameters upon receipt of
payment for the enclosed invoice.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. We look forward to having you in
our program and to working with you in the future. If you have questions or need
additional information, contact me at 919-733-3908, ext. 207.
//S1� ii�nce��rellye,
James W. Meyer
Laboratory Section
JWM:cub
Enclosure
cc: Connie Brower
Raleigh Regional Office
4.Nx,
u�
INDENR
Laboratory Section N.C. Division of Water Quality 1623 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1623
[phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: w .esb.enr.state.nc.us/lab

INVOICE
DENR/DWO WASTEWATER
LABORATORY CERTIFICATION
FIELD PARAMETERS
Certificate No. 5024
(if assigned)
Laboratory Name: Honeywell International, Inc.
Address P.O. Box 166
Moncure, NC 27559
Attention: Ms. Jennifer Overcash
ACCORDING TO YOUR APPLICATION YOU HAVE REQUESTED CERTIFICATION FOR THE FOLLOWING PARAMETER
INORGANICS
RESIDUAL CHLORINE
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
pH
TEMPERATURE
STATE LAB USE ONLY
Invoice Number: 004058
Date: 05/0612002
Fowarded By:
Date Fowarded:
The following statement itemizes the fee required for obtaining or renewing certification in the North Carolina Wastewater Laboratory Certification Program.
Total Assessment Due: $100.00 Minimum Annual Fee for Municipal
Industrial Lab ($100.00). Commercial Lab
($200.00).
Please make your check payable to: DENR/DWQ Lab Certification.
Mail payment to:
DENR/DWQ Laboratory Section
1623 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1623
For proper credit, return a copy of this invoice with your payment. And enter your certificate number (if assigned) on the check.
NOTE: In accordance with NCGS 25-3-512, a $20.00 processing fee will be charged for any check on which payment was refused by the payer bank.
is