NC0025348_Permit Issuance_20131101

.s
I�CDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
November 1, 2013
Mr. Michael R. Epperson
City Manager
P.O. Box 1129
New Bern, North Carolina 28563-1129
Subject: NPDES Final Permit
Permit NCO025348
New Bern WWTP and WTP
Craven County
Class IV Facility
Dear Mr. Epperson:
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the
subject permit. Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES permit. This permit is
issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency dated October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended).
The final permit contains the following changes from your previous permit:
Outfall 002:
Following the Mercury Permitting Guidance for the implementation of the Statewide
Mercury TMDL mercury data was reviewed to determine the need for a limit or a
Mercury Minimization Plan. A mercury limit will not be required for your facility but
you have to develop a Mercury Minimization Plan. See Condition A.(12.) for the
MMP requirements.
As a result of a reasonable potential analysis monitoring for selenium, total phenols,
total copper, total silver, total zinc and cyanide were eliminated from your monitoring
requirements.
1617 Mail Service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet www.ncwatenlualkom
-�FCFIVED
NOV 0 5 2013
✓rn I Cn Wunu l 16tCTI0N
`'10UATInM oROCF,9gINr, UNIT
VWoCarolinane
ffra!!rff
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

a
City of New Bern
November 1, 2013
Page 2 of 3
Outfall 003:
■ As a result of a reasonable potential analysis monitoring for total lead, total zinc and
total copper were eliminated from your monitoring requirements.
• As a result of statistical analysis of the data, monitoring for fluoride, total manganese,
total iron, total nitrogen and total phosphorus were eliminated from your monitoring
requirements.
■ Monitoring frequencies were modified according to the DWR WTP permitting
guidance.
Outfall 004:
• This outfall was removed from the permit.
Outfalls 005:
■ This outfall was added to the permit to monitor the flow to the quarry.
Outfall 006:
• This outfall was added to the pemut to monitor the total nitrogen load going to the
Neuse River.
The following changes to the draft permit are included in the final permit:
Outfall 006:
• Condition A.(5.) was modified to provide more detail on the credit allowance and the
schedule to develop the methodology to estimate future credits.
In addition please note that a special condition was added to your permit including
requirements for electronic reporting. Proposed federal regulations require electronic submittal
of all discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) and specify that, if a state does not establish a
system to receive such submittals, then permittees must submit DMRs electronically to the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Division anticipates that these regulations will be
adopted and is beginning implementation.
The requirement to begin reporting discharge monitoring data electronically using the NC
DWR's Electronic Discharge Monitoring Report (eDMR) internet application has been added to
your final NPDES permit. [See Special Condition A. (14.)] For information on eDMR,
registering for eDMR and obtaining an eDMR user account, please visit the following web page:
htti)://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/admin/bog/ipu/edmr. For information on EPA's proposed
NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule, please visit the following web site:
http://www2.epa.gov/compliance/proposed-nodes-electronic-reporting-rule.
rp�.

r
City of New Bem
November 1, 2013
Page 3 of 3
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit
are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request
within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a
written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed
with the Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina
27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The
Division may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does
not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division
of Water Resources or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area
Management Act or any other federal or local governmental permits that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Teresa Rodriguez at
telephone number [phone] or at email [e-mail].
(Sincerely,
V
Thomas A. Reeder
cc: NPDES Files
Central Files
Washington Regional Office / Surface Water Protection Section
EPA Region 4 (e-copy)
ESS/Ecosystems Unit, Attn. Carrie Ruhlman (e-copy)
Aquatic Toxicology Unit (e-copy)

Permit NCO025348
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards
and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, the
City of New Bern
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from facilities located at the
New Bern Wastewater Treatment Plant
NCSR 1404, Craven County
and
New Bern Water Treatment Plant
NC Highway 55, Craven County
to receiving waters designated as the Neuse River in the Neuse River Basin
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in
Parts I, II, III, and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective.......................................................................................... December 1, 2013
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on ........................... June 30, 2018
Signed this day ..................November 1, 2013
Thdmas A. Reeder, Director
Division of Water Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC0025348,
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked. As of this
permit issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the exclusive
authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and
provisions included herein.
The City of New Bern
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate the existing wastewater treatment plant, which is approved for an average
design flow of 6.5 MGD through internal outfall 002 and consists of:
• Influent flow meter
• Automatic and manual bar screen
• Grit removal
• Flow splitter box
• 4 anaerobic basins
• 2 anoxic basins
• 2 oxidation ditches with 2 mixers each
• 2 secondary anoxic basins
• 2 reaeration basins
• Secondary flow sputter box
• 2 clarifiers
• 3-cell tertiary filter
• Flash mix tank
• 2 chlorine contact tanks with liquid chlorine
• Dechlorination with sodium bisulfite
• Reaeration basin with 2 discharge basins
• 2 effluent flow meters
• Diffuser
• 3 aerated sludge tanks
• Filter press
• Pasteurization (lime and heat) vessel
• sludge storage area
This facility is located at the New Bern WWTP, off NCSR 1404 near New Bern in Craven County.
2. Operate a drinking water treatment plant with a discharge of waste water from filter backwash and
softener regeneration backwash through Internal Outfall 003. The Water Treatment Plant
Wastewater Treatment consists of:
• Settling lagoon
• Pump
• Force main to tie into the existing WWTP discharge line, with a check valve installed between
the WTP connection and the line to the quarry.
This facility is located at the New Bern Water Treatment Plant TW #2 WTP off NC Highway 55 near
New Bern in Craven County.
3. Discharge treated wastewaters from the wastewater treatment plant and the drinking water
treatment plant into the Neuse River, currently a class SC -Swamp NSW water in the Neuse River
Basin, at the location specified on the permit map (next page) through outfall 001.
4. Continue to operate a pump station, force main, and infiltration system and discharge treated
wastewater to the former Martin Marietta quarry (East Lake), in accordance with the terms and
conditions of permit WQ0017635.
W
ii

Permit NCO025348
\
A,
I
S
High -Rate Infiltration
'9
Quarry Disposal5ys[em
Discharne Point
,y
Outfai 001
. .
W. 35°08'20"
"yr
tiAM
LOng. 7P 03'37•
\
V,
a
water Treatment Plant
Wastewater?
—
Treatment Plant
„o -�
IS
-11
VICINITY MAP City of New Bern NCO025348
New Bern Wastewater Treatment Plant and
x Water Treatment Plant
Facility Location
_ Receiving Stream: Neuse River
N Stream Classification: SC -Swamp NSW
USGS Quad: G30NE River Basin: Neuse
(New Bern) Sub -Basin #: 03-04-10
Assessment Number: 27-(96)bl
iii

Permit NC0025348-'!:
(This page intentionally left blank.)
iv

Permit NCO025348
A.(1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - Outfall 001
(a.) During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge treated filter backwash and softener regeneration backwash
from the Water Treatment Plant and treated wastewater from the Wastewater Treatment Plant
from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified
below:
PARAMETER
.. EFFLUENTUMITATIONS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS .
Monthly Weekly Daily
Average Average Maximum
Measurement Sample Sample
Frequency Type Location 1
Flow
Daily
Calculated'
El
Acute Toxicity 3
Mysidopsis bahia, 24hr., o
No Significant Mortality at 90 /o
Quarterly
Composite
E1
Footnotes:
1. E1- Combined Effluent to river; E2 - WWTP Effluent to Internal Outfall 002; E3 - WTP Effluent to Internal Outfall
003; E5 - WWTP Effluent to East Lake quarry disposal system.
2. The daily flow to the river shall be calculated as follows:
Effluent Flow (E1) = WWTP Effluent Flow (E2) - Flow to Quarry (E5) + WTP Effluent Flow 003 (E3)
3. Acute Toxicity (Mysidopsis bahia) P/ F @ 90 % with testing in March, June, September and December (see A. (9)).
Samples for the Whole Effluent Toxicity Test shall be representative of the discharge. If the WWTP effluent is being
diverted to the quarry, it must not be diverted to discharge to the diffuser for the purpose of diluting the WTP
effluent.
(b.) There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Figure 1. Effluent Wastestream and Outfall Configuration
Reuse (Former 004)
Ouarry (East Lake) Neuse
River
005 Subsurface Flow
(E5) 001 (El)
New Bern 002 (E2)
WWTP
o06
(E6)
New Bern 003 (0)
WTP
Footnotes:
1. E1- Combined Effluent to river; E2 - WWTP Effluent to Internal Outfall 002; E3 - WTP Effluent to Internal Outfall
003; E5 - WWTP Effluent to East Lake quarry disposal system; E6 - Net WWTP Effluent to river.
Part I, Page 1 of 12

Permit NC002534,9"
A.(2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - Outfall 002
(a.) During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge treated wastewater from the Wastewater Treatment Plant
from internal outfall 002. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as
specified below:
,..:PARAMETER• .
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
_
MONITORING.REQUIREMENT3
.
, .
Monthly Weekly bally'
Average Average Maximum
_... �
Measurement Sample Sample
Frequency Type. Location 1
Flow - 002
6.5 MGD 2
Continuous
Recording
I, E2
BODs 3,4 Summer
Winter
5.0 mg/L
10.0 mg/L
7.5 mg/L
15.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
I, E2
Total Suspended Solids 4
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
I, E2
NH3-N 3 Summer
Winter
1.0 mg/L
2.0 mg/L
3.0 mg/L
6.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
E2
pH
Shall be within the range of 6.8 and 8.5
standard units at all times
Daily
Grab
E2
Enterococci
(geometric mean)
35/100 mL
276/100 mL
Daily
Grab
E2
Total Residual Chlorine 5
13 pg/L
Daily
Grab
E2
Dissolved Oxygen
Daily average shall not be less than 5.0 mg/L
Daily
Grab
E2
Temperature (°C)
Daily
Grab
E2
Total Nitrogen (TN)
Monitor and report (mg/L)
Weekly
Composite
E2
TN Load
Monitor and report (lb/month)
Monthly
Calculated
E2
Monitor and report (annual mass loading) 6
Annually
Calculated
E2
Total Phosphorus
2.0 mg/L (quarterly average) 7
Weekly
Composite
E2
Total Copper
Monthly
Composite
E2
Total Silver
Quarterly
Composite
E2
Cyanide
Quarterly
Composite
E2
Effluent Pollutant Scan
See A.(12.)
Grab
E2
Footnotes:
1. Sample Iocations: I - Influent to WWTP; E2 - WWTP Effluent to Internal Outfall 002.
2. The Permittee may measure flow through the treatment plant and/or flow to Internal Outfall 002 using any
reasonable combination of measurements that will provide accurate results. Whenever separate flow
measurements are used to calculate either of these reportable flows, the daily sum of the component flows shall be
calculated first, and monthly average flow shall then be calculated as the average of these daily flows.
3. For the purposes of this permit, summer is defined as the period from April 1 through October 31 and winter is
defined as the period from November 1 through March 31 of each year.
4. The monthly average effluent BODS and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the
respective influent values (85% removal).
5. Chlorine limits and monitoring are required if chlorinated water is discharged. The Division shall consider all
effluent TRC values reported below 50 ug/L to be in compliance with the permit. However, the Permittee shall
continue to record and submit all values reported by a North Carolina certified laboratory (including field
certified), even if these values fall below 50 ug/L.
6. The annual mass loading for total nitrogen for Internal Outfall 002 shall be monitored and calculated as prescribed
in Condition A. (6.).
7. The quarterly average for total phosphorus shall be the average of composite samples collected weekly during each
calendar quarter (January -March, April June, July -September, October -December).
(b.) There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Part I, Page 2 of 12

M
Permit NCO025348
A.(3.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - Outfall 003
(a.) During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge treated filter backwash and softener regeneration backwash
from the Water Treatment Plant from internal outfall 003. Such discharges shall be limited and
monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
PARAMETER
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly Weekly Daily
Average Average Maximum
Measurement Sample Sample
Frequency Type Location'
Flow - 003
Continuous
Recording
E3
Total Residual Chlorine 2
13 pg/L
2/Month
Grab
E3
Total Dissolved Solids
Monthly
Grab
E3
pH
Shall be within the range of 6.8 and 8.5
standard units at all times
2/Month
Grab
E3
Total Suspended Solids
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
2/Month
Grab
E3
Turbidity
Monthly
Grab
E3
Ammonia Nitrogen
Quarterly
Composite
E3
Salinity
Monthly
Composite
E3
Footnotes:
1. Sample location: E3 -WTP Effluent to Internal Outfall 003.
2. Chlorine limits and monitoring are required if chlorinated water is discharged. The Division shall consider all
effluent TRC values reported below 50 ug/L to be in compliance with the permit. However, the Permittee shall
continue to record and submit all values reported by a North Carolina certified laboratory (including field
certified), even if these values fall below 50 ug/L.
(b.) All samples collected should be from a representative discharge event.
(c.) There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
A.(4.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - Outfall 005
(a.) During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration the
Permittee is authorized to discharge treated effluent from the Wastewater Treatment Plant
(internal outfall 002) to the East Lake quarry infiltration system (internal outfall 005) in
accordance with permit WQ0017635. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the
Permittee as specified below:
PARAMETER
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS.
Monthly Weekly Daily
Average Average . Maximum,
Measurement Sample
Frequency � Type
Sample
Location'
Flow
Monitor & Report (MGD)
Daily
Recording
E5
Total Monthly Flow
Monitor & Report (MG)
Monthly
Recording or
Calculated
E5
Footnotes
1. Sample location: E5 - WWTP Effluent to East Lake Quarry Infiltration System.
Part I, Page 3 of 12

Permit NC0025348'
A.(5.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS — Outfall 006
(a.) During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge treated wastewater from internal outfall 006. Such discharges
shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
_'PARAMETER
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS.. ,
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly Weekly Daily
Average . , -Average Maximum
Measurement Sample
. : Frequency. Type
Sample
Location'
Net TN Load2,3
Monitor and report (lb/month)
Monthly
Calculated
E6
64,210 lb/year 2
Annually
Calculated
E6
Footnotes
1. Sample location: E6 - Net WWTP Effluent to river.
2. The Net TN Load discharged to the Neuse River shall be calculated as follows:
Net TN Load = TN Load (outfall 002) - TN Credits
where TN Credits = TN Load to East Lake (outfall 005) - Subsurface TN Load to surface waters.
TN Loads at outfalls 002 and 005 shall be calculated as prescribed in condition A.(7.), CaIculation Of Total Nitrogen
Loads. Subsurface TN Loads shall be determined as described in paragraphs d. and e. below.
3. See related TN monitoring requirements in conditions A.(2.) (outfall 002) and A.(4.) (outfall 005).
(b.) The Net TN Load at internal outfall 006 shall be the measure of the Permittee's total nitrogen
discharge to surface waters for the purpose of determining compliance with the TN Load limit
established pursuant to the Neuse River Basin Nutrient Management Strategy.
(c.) The New Bern VVVVTP has the ability to divert treated effluent from its Neuse River discharge to
the Martin Marietta (East Lake) Quarry, thereby reducing its surface water discharge and the
associated nitrogen load. The Permittee may receive credit for this reduction, as described in this
condition, in order to comply with the Net TN Load limitation.
(d.) Beginning upon the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee will be
credited for 100% of the nitrogen load diverted from the Neuse River discharge (Outfall 001) to
the Quarry (Outfall 005); that is, the Subsurface TN Load is assumed to equal zero. In the event
that the permit expires and is administratively extended, the Permittee will continue to receive
100% credit for the diversion until the effective date of the subsequently issued permit renewal.
(e.) The Permittee may request nitrogen credits beyond this permit term. In order to receive
continued credits, the Permittee must develop an acceptable methodology for estimating
subsurface nitrogen loads and determining appropriate annual credits on an on -going basis. An
approvable methodology must (1) provide a reasonable estimate of the Subsurface TN Load
delivered from the quarry to the Neuse River in a given year and (2) account for uncertainty in
the estimate in order to ensure that credits do not exceed actual diversions from surface waters.
The following steps are voluntary. However, all steps are required for continued credits, and the
dates are intended to provide sufficient time for Division reviews. In order to qualify for
continued nitrogen credits and avoid a lapse in credits, the Permittee must:
(i.) No later than June 30, 2014, submit to the Division a conceptual framework for the proposed
subsurface load estimate methodology.
(ii.) No later than January 1, 2017, submit to the Division a written request for continued credits
with a detailed description of the proposed methodology.
Part I, Page 4 of 12

Permit NCO025348
, (iii.) Submit four copies of each of the above documents by the specified dates to the Division at:
NC Division of Water Resources
NPDES Complex Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
(f.) Beginning upon Division approval, or as specified in the approval, the Permittee will be credited
for nitrogen load diverted from the Neuse River discharge (Outfall 001) to the Quarry (Outfall
005), in accordance with the approved methodology.
(g.) Nitrogen credits shall accrue on a monthly basis and shall be valid only for the calendar year in
which they accrue.
(h.) The nitrogen credits described in this condition do not account for nitrogen diversions to the
Mackilwean Turf Farm or other reclaimed water irrigation facilities. Any TN Load calculations
should also reflect such diversions of nitrogen away from surface waters.
A.(6.) INSTREAM MONITORING
(a.) Instream monitoring requirements in this NPDES permit shall be provisionally waived so long as
the Permittee remains a member of the Lower Neuse Basin Association and the Association
continues to function as approved by the Division and the Environmental Management
Commission. If the Permittee does not participate in the Association or if the Association ceases to
function, the instream monitoring requirements in this permit become effective immediately; and
the Division may reopen this permit by administrative letter to establish additional instream
monitoring requirements it deems necessary to adequately characterize the effects of the
discharges on water quality in the receiving stream.
NOTE: The following need only be sampled if the permittee should elect to withdraw
membership in the Neuse River Basin Association.
PARAMETER
SAMPLE TYPE
FREQUENCY
LOACATION
Dissolved. Oxygen
Grab
3/week (June — September)
U,D
1/week (October — May)
Temperature
Grab
3/week (June — September)
U,D
1/week (October — May)
Conductivity
Grab
3/week (June — September)
U,D
1/week (October — May)
PH
Grab
3/week (June — September)
U,D
1/week (October — May)
Salinity
Grab
3/week (June — September)
U,D
1/week (October — May)
(b.) Sampling Locations: U - Upstream at Gap Landing; D = D1 + D2; D1- Downstream at mid -
channel across from Lewis Ferry; D2 - Downstream at mid -channel at US Highway 17. All
upstream and downstream samples shall be grab samples. Instream samples at D2 shall be
collected three times per week during the months of June, July, August and September, and once
per week during the remaining months of the year. Instream samples at D1 shall be collected once
per week during the months of June, July, August and September. All instream samples shall be
collected at the top and bottom of the water column. Salinity, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, and
temperature should be taken at one -foot intervals, measured vertically in the water column.
Part I, Page 5 of 12

Permit NCO025348 '
A.(7.) CALCULATION OF TOTAL NITROGEN LOADS
(a.) The Permittee shall calculate monthly and annual TN Loads as follows:
(i.) Monthly TN Load (pounds/month) = TN x TMF x 8.34
where: TN = the average Total Nitrogen concentration (mg/L) of the composite
samples collected during the month
TMF = the Total Monthly Flow of wastewater discharged during the month
(MG/ month)
8.34 = conversion factor, from (mg/L x MG) to pounds
(ii.) Annual TN Load (pounds/year) = Sum of the 12 Monthly TN Loads for the calendar year
(b.) The Permittee shall report monthly Total Nitrogen results (mg/ L and pounds/ month) in the
appropriate discharge monitoring report for each month and shall report each year's results
(pounds/year) with the December report for that year.
A.(8.) ANNUAL LIMITS FOR TOTAL NITROGEN
(a.) Total Nitrogen (TN) allocations and TN Load limits for NPDES dischargers in the Neuse River
basin apply on a calendar year basis.
(b.) For any given calendar year, the Permittee shall be in compliance with the annual TN Load limit
in this Permit if:
(i.) the Permittee's annual TN discharge is less than or equal to its TN Load limit, or
(ii.) the Permittee is a co-permittee member of a compliance association.
(c.) If the Permittee is not a co-permittee member of a compliance association and the Permittee's
cumulative annual TN discharge exceeds the effective TN Load limit in this permit at any point
during the calendar year, the Permittee is in violation of its TN Load limit, and each day of a
continuing violation shall constitute a separate violation.
(d.) The TN Load limit in this Permit (if any) may be modified as the result of allowable changes in
the Permittee's TN allocation.
(i.) Allowable changes include those resulting from purchase of TN allocation from the
Wetlands Restoration Fund; purchase, sale, trade, or lease of allocation between the
Permittee and other dischargers; regionalization; and other transactions approved by the
Division.
(ii.) The Permittee may request a modification of the TN Load limit in this Permit to reflect
allowable changes in its TN allocation. Upon receipt of timely and proper application, the
Division will modify the permit as appropriate and in accordance with state and federal
program requirements.
(iii.) Changes in TN limits become effective on January 1 of the year following permit
modification. The Division must receive application no later than August 31 for changes
proposed for the following calendar year.
(iv.) Application shall be sent to:
NCDWR/ NPDES Complex Permitting Unit
Attn: Neuse River Basin Coordinator
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
(e.) If the Permittee is a member and co-permittee of an approved compliance association, its TN
discharge during that year is governed by that association's group NPDES permit and the TN
limits therein.
Part I, Page 6 of 12

s:
Permit NCO025348
(i.) The Permittee shall be considered a Co-Permittee Member for any given calendar year in
which it is identified as such in Appendix A of the association's group NPDES permit.
(ii.) Association roster(s) and members' TN allocations will be' updated annually and in
accordance with state and federal program requirements.
(iii.) If the Permittee intends to join or leave a compliance association, the Division must be
notified of the proposed action in accordance with the procedures defined in the
association's NPDES permit.
(A) Upon receipt of timely and proper notification, the Division will modify the permit as
appropriate and in accordance with state and federal program requirements.
(B) Membership changes in a compliance association become effective on January 1 of the
year following modification of the association's permit.
(f.) The TN monitoring and reporting requirements in this Permit remain in effect until expiration of
this Permit and are not affected by the Permittee's membership in a compliance association.
A.(9.) TOTAL NITROGEN ALLOCATIONS
(a.) The following table lists the Total Nitrogen (TN) allocation(s) assigned to, acquired by, or
transferred to the Permittee in accordance with the Neuse River nutrient management rule (T15A
NCAC 02B .0234) and the status of each as of permit issuance. For compliance purposes, this table
does not supersede any TN limits) established elsewhere in this permit or in the NPDES permit
of a compliance association of which the Permittee is a Co-Permittee Member.
ALLOQ'1
°DATA
ALLO�ATZUN SAMOU�INT(�.)
z ; { < ,� r
TYPE=
, rS0_URe�
Y
. 1T �.
.�,
�.t:r y a'�,�
Estuary
Deis. a� s:. =;
c w y
$� TUSy
,F: -�
,
Base
Assigned by Rule
12/7/97;
52,937
52,937
Active
(T15A NCAC 02B .0234)
4/1/03
Connection of Zachary
Supplemental
Taylor WWTP -
2/5/2002
5,632
5,632
Active
NCO066613
Connection of Neuse
Supplemental
Woods Apartments
5/22/2003
243
243
Active
WWTP - NCO042430
Connection of W.
Supplemental
Craven Middle School
8/12/2003
344
344
Active
WWTP - NCO029904
Connection of Neuse
Supplemental
River W&S WWTP -
6/27/2005
2,022
2,022
Active
NCO070084
Connection of Craven
Supplemental
Co. W&S WWTP —
6/30/2005
3,033
3,033
Active
NCO056545
TOTAL
64,210
64,210
Active
Footnote:
1. Transport Factor =100%
(b.) Any addition, deletion, or modification of the listed allocation(s) (other than to correct
typographical errors) or any change to Active status of any of the listed allocations shall be
considered a major modification of this permit and shall be subject to the public review process
afforded such modifications under state and federal rules.
Part I, Page 7 of 12

Permit NCO02534S
A.(10.) ACUTE TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY)
The Permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a quarterly basis using protocols defined in the
North Carolina Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology For Determining Acute Toxicity
In A Single Effluent Concentration" ( Revised -July, 1992 or subsequent versions). The monitoring shall
be performed as a Mysid Shrimp (Mysidopsis bahia) 24-hour static test. The effluent concentration at
which there may be at no time significant acute mortality is 90% (defined as treatment two in the
procedure document). Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained during
representative effluent discharge below all waste treatment. The tests will be performed during the
months of March, June, September, and December.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code
TGE3C. Additionally, DWR Form AT-2 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Section no later
than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/ physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
required, the Permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test
form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the
report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted
to the Environmental Sciences Section at the address cited above.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should the Permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, then
monthly monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing,
this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North
Carolina Division of Water Resources indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit
may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will
require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following
the month of the initial monitoring.
Part I, Page 8 of 12

Permit NCO025348
A.(11.) NON -DETECTION REPORTING AND DETERMINATION OF COMPLIANCE
When pursuant to this permit a pollutant analysis is conducted using an approved analytical protocol
with the appropriate minimum detection level and a result of "non -detectable" or "below quantitation
limit' is obtained, the Permittee shall record that result as reported. For the purpose of determining
compliance with a permit limit for the pollutant, the numerical value of that individual analytical result
shall be zero.
A.(12.) MERCURY MINIMIZATION PLAN
The permittee will develop and implement a mercury minimization plan during the term of this
permit. The MMP shall be developed 180 days from the effective day of the permit, and shall be
available for inspection on -site. A sample MMP was developed through a stakeholder review process
and has been placed on the Division website for guidance
(http: / / portal.ncdennorg/web /wq / swp / Ps / npdes, under Mercury Minimi nation Plan). The MMP
should place emphasis on identification of mercury contributors and goals for reduction. Results shall
be summarized and submitted with the next permit renewal
Part I, Page 9 of 12

Permit NC002534*
A.(13.) EFFLUENT POLLUTANT SCAN
(a.) The Permittee shall perform a total of three (3) Effluent Pollutant Scans for all parameters listed
below. One scan must be performed in each of the following years: 2014, 2015, and 2016.
Analytical methods shall be in accordance with 40 CFR Part 136 and shall be sufficiently sensitive
to determine whether parameters are present in concentrations greater than applicable standards
and criteria. Samples should be collected with one quarterly toxicity test each year, and must
represent seasonal variation [i.e., do not sample in the same quarter every year]. Unless
otherwise indicated, metals shall be analyzed as "total recoverable."
Ammonia (as N)
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
1,1-dichloroethylene
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Dissolved oxygen
1,2-dichloropropane
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Nitrate/Nitrite
1,3-dichloropropylene
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Kjeldahl nitrogen
Ethylbenzene
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Oil and grease
Methyl bromide
2-chloronaphthalene
Phosphorus
Methyl chloride
4-chlorophenyl.phenyl ether
Total dissolved solids
Methylene chloride
Chrysene
Hardness
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Antimony
Tetrachloroethylene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Arsenic
Toluene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Beryllium
1,1,1-trichloroethane
1,2-dichlorobenzene
Cadmium
1,1,2-trichloroethane
1,3-dichlorobenzene
Chromium
Trichloroethylene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
Copper
Vinyl chloride
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Lead
Acid -extractable compounds.
Diethyl phthalate
Mercury (EPA Method 1631E)
P-chloro-m-cresol
Dimethyi phthalate
Nickel
2-chlorophenol
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Selenium
2,4-dichlorophenol
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Silver
2,4-dimethylphenol
1,2-dipheny[hydrazine
Thallium
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
Fluoranthene
Zinc
2,4-dinitrophenol
Fluorene
Cyanide
2-nibophenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Total phenolic compounds
4-nitrophenol
Hexachlorobutadiene
Volatile emanic compounds:
Pentachlorophencl
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Acrolein
Phenol
Hexachloroethane
Acrylonitrile
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Benzene
Base -neutral compounds:
Isophorone
Bromoform
Acenaphthene
Naphthalene
Carbon tetrachloride
Acenaphthylene
Nitrobenzene
Chlorobenzene
Anthracene
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Chlorodibromomethane
Benzidine
N-nitrosodimethylamine
Chloroethane
Benzo(a)anthracene
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Benzo(a)pyrene
Phenanthrene
Chloroform
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Pyrene
Dichlorobromomethane
Benzo(ghi)perylene
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
1,1-dichloroethane
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
1,2-dichloroethane
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
(b.) Reporting. Test results shall be reported on DWR Form -A MR-PPA1 (or in a form approved by
the Director) by December 31st of each designated sampling year. The report shall be submitted
to the following address: NC DENR / DWR / Central Files,1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27699-1617.
Part I, Page 10 of 12

`M i
Permit NCO025348
{11-
A. (14.) ELECTRONIC REPORTING OF DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORTS
Proposed federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring reports (DMRs)
and specify that, if a state does not establish a system to receive such submittals, then permittees must
submit DMRs electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Division anticipates
that these regulations will be adopted and is beginning implementation in late 2013.
NOTE: This special condition supplements or supersedes the following sections within Part II of this
permit (Standard Conditions for NPDES Permits):
• Section B. (11.) Signatory Requirements
• Section D. (2.)
• Section D. (6.)
• Section E. (5.)
Reporting
Records Retention
Monitoring Reports
I. Reporting_[Supersedes Section D. (2.) and Section E. (5.) (a)]
Beginning no later than 90 days from the effective date of this permit, the permittee shall begin
reporting discharge monitoring data electronically using the NC DWR's Electronic Discharge
Monitoring Report (eDMR) internet application.
Monitoring results obtained during the previous month(s) shall be summarized for each month and
submitted electronically using eDMR. The eDMR system allows permitted facilities to enter
monitoring data and submit DMRs electronically using the internet. Until such time that the state's
eDMR application is compliant with EPA's Cross -Media Electronic Reporting Regulation
(CROMERR), permittees will be required to submit all discharge monitoring data to the state
electronically using eDMR and will be required to complete the eDMR submission by printing,
signing, and submitting one signed original and a copy of the computer printed eDMR to the
following address:
NC DENR / DWR / Information Processing Unit
ATTENTION: Central Files / eDMR
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If a permittee is unable to use the eDMR system due to a demonstrated hardship or due to the
facility being physically located in an area where less than 10 percent of the households have
broadband access, then a temporary waiver from the NPDES electronic reporting requirements
may be granted and discharge monitoring data may be submitted on paper DMR forms (MR 1,1.1,
2, 3) or alternative forms approved by the Director. Duplicate signed copies shall be submitted to
the mailing address above.
Requests for temporary waivers from the NPDES electronic reporting requirements must be
submitted in writing to the Division for written approval at least sixty (60) days prior to the date the
facility would be required under this permit to begin using eDMR. Temporary waivers shall be
valid for twelve (12) months and shall thereupon expire. At such time, DMRs shall be submitted
electronically to the Division unless the permittee re -applies for and is granted a new temporary
waiver by the Division.
Information on eDMR and application for a temporary waiver from the NPDES electronic reporting
requirements is found on the following web page:
Part I, Page 11 of 12

Permit NCO025348-
hn://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/adn-tin/bog/ipu/edmr
Regardless of the submission method, the first DMR is due on the last day of the month following
the issuance of the permit or in the case of a new facility, on the last day of the month following the
commencement of discharge.
2. Signatory Requirements [Supplements Section B. (11.) (b) and supersedes Section B. 11.) (d)l
All eDMRs submitted to the permit issuing authority shall be signed by a person described in Part
II, Section B. (11.)(a) or by a duly authorized representative of that person as described in Part II,
Section B. (11.)(b). A person, and not a position, must be delegated signatory authority for eDMR
reporting purposes.
For eDMR submissions, the person signing and submitting the DMR must obtain an eDMR user
account and login credentials to access the eDMR system. For more information on North
Carolina's eDMR system, registering for eDMR and obtaining an eDMR user account, please visit
the following web page:
hgp://12ortal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/`­admin/bog/il2u/edmr
Certification. Any person submitting an electronic DMR using the state's eDMR system shall make
the following certification [40 CFR 122.221. NO OTHER STATEMENTS OF CERTIFICATION WILL
BE ACCEPTED:
"I cerhfij, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
3. Records Retention [Supplements Section D. (6.)]
The permittee shall retain records of all Discharge Monitoring Reports, including eDMR
submissions. These records or copies shall be maintained for a period of at least 3 years from the
date of the report. This period may be extended by request of the Director at any time [40 CFR
122.41].
Part I, Page 12 of 12

r"
11odriguez, Teresa
From: Jordan Hughes <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 9:01 AM
To: Rodriguez, Teresa
Cc: Templeton, Mike; Risgaard, Jon; 'Blaine Humphrey'
Subject: RE: Draft NPDES Permit and Water Reclamation Permit Modification - City of New
Bern
Teresa,
Please accept this correspondence as conformation of City's desire to request the revisions to the NPDES permit as
outlined below by Mr. Humphrey. Just let me know if this request needs to be submitted in a more formal manner.
Best Regards,
Jordan B. Hughes, P.E.
City Engineer
City of New Bern
Office [phone]
Cell [phone]
[e-mail]
-----Original Message --
From: Blaine Humphrey imailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 201311:41 AM
To: Risgaard, Jon
Cc: Templeton, Mike; Thornburg, Nathaniel; Rodriguez, Teresa; [e-mail]; MaistoravichJ@newbern-
nc.or • Greg Churchill
Subject: Draft NPDES Permit and Water Reclamation Permit Modification - City of New Bern
Jon,
Per the conference call today with you and Jordan Hughes, we will work with the City to provide a mark-up of suggested
language for the modified permit WQ0017635, which was not specifically stated in the cover letter of the July 10, 2013
permit modification submittal. Is there any way to get the WORD file of the permit, to utilize the "Track Changes"
feature during the discussion/modification process? This would be easier/cleaner than "red lining" a copy, scanning and
sending to you for review.
Also, as we discussed for the draft NPDES permit, the City (with your
concurrence) would like to reword/modify items "c." and "d." under Article A.(5.) describing Outfall 006, on page 4 of 9
(attached). You had indicated you would discuss with Mike and Teresa to determine appropriate language for the
NPDES permit, coordinating with the modified Water Reclamation Permit. Item "c." leaves room for interpretation
apparently. Maybe this should be referenced under A.(4.), Outfall 005? You had also indicated the date the City would
start receiving 100% nutrient credit would be the date the modified WQ0017635 permit was issued, not necessarily
waiting until January, 2014. Item "d." could be left in, as long as the permit referenced was understood to be the
modified WQ permit, and not the old permit. If after discussing with Mike and Teresa, they require formal/official

comments from the City, Jordan can respond appropriately. Should they wish to discuss via conference call prior to
making any changes, we can set up the call with everyone. Thank you for your assistance.
M. Blaine Humphrey, P.E.
Project Manager
Rivers and Associates, Inc.
107 E. Second Street
Greenville, NC 27834
(252)752-4 one
[phone] Fax
mail to: bhumphrey riversandassociates.com
s
website: www.riversandassociates.com
"You're either part of the solution, or part of the problem."
- Eldridge Cleaver
If you are not the intended recipient, you must destroy this message and inform the sender immediately. This electronic
mail message and any attachments, as well as any electronic mail message[s] sent in response to it may be considered
public record and as such subject to request and review by anyone at any time. It also may contain information which is
confidential within the meaning of applicable federal and state laws.
If you are not the intended recipient, you must destroy this message and inform the sender immediately. This electronic
mail message and any attachments, as well as any electronic mail message(s) sent in response to it may be considered
public record and as such subject to request and review by anyone at any time. It also may contain information which is
confidential within the meaning of applicable federal and state laws.
2

AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF WAKE
Advertiser Name: NCDENR/ DWQ/ POINT SOURCE
Address: 1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
PROTECTION SECTION/ I
RALEIGH, NC 276991617
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of Wake
County North Carolina, duly commissioned and
authorized to administer oaths, affirmations, etc.,
personally appeared DEBORAH MAHAFFEY, who
being duly sworn or affirmed, according to law, doth
depose and say that he or she is Accounts
Receivable Specialist of The News & Observer a
corporation organized and doing business under
the Laws of the State of North Carolina, and
publishing a newspaper known as The News &
Observer, in the City of Raleigh, Wake County and
State aforesaid, the said newspaper in which such
notice, paper, document, or legal advertisement
was published was, at the time of each and every
such publication, a newspaper meeting all of the
requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of
the General Statutes of North Carolina and was a
qualified newspaper within the meaning of Section
1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina,
and that as such he or she makes this affidavit; and
,"°`^�jt OQrpr;/'yo,,
is familiar with the books, files and business of said
rN,
°`oy
corporation and by reference to the files of said
T
publication the attached advertisement for
o° ova„
c
NCDENR/ DWQ/ POINT SOURCE was inserted in
Ste.
the aforesaid newspaper on dates as follows:
�?otl
NA`\\\\``,c`
07/02/2013
DEBORAH MAHAFFEY, Accounts (16vabl Specialist
Wake County, North Carolina
Ad Number
0000563588
Public Notion
North Carolina Envimnmentol
og Manement COmmissioryNPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27M.1617
Notice of Intent to Issue a NPOES
Wastewater Permit
N80: July 2, 2013
Sworn to and subscribed before me
This 4th day of Jam, 2013
My Commission Expires: 6wa/�Qe
4
- 4ek
z�Kotary Signature

all
1p
B?WKWASH WASTE —
BRINE WASTE
ELEVA TED
AERA 77ON TANK
PRESSURE ZEOU7F
WELL FILTER SOFTENER
PUMP
PUMP _T
GROUND
STORAGE
DISTRIBUTION
I -q SYSTEM
DETEN77ON BYPASS CL2 NH3 IIII
KMnO4
RVEM AND SOFTENERS PROCESS SCHEMA
BACKWASH WASTE
BRINE WASTE
PRESSURE ZEOUTE
FX TER SOFTENER
LAGOON —
PUMP
TO STREAM
WASTE PROCESS SCHEMATIC
0:%'vMMERN 25200 WTP Dcaipkbwg RcportsWcwBcm-F' dSoRcnaaSchamade MRS BAA.DWO. Modci, HVSAODS' :I4:42 AM,14 =H

SIW
NPDES/A uifer Protection Permitting Unit Pretreatment Information Request Form
PERMIT WRITER COMPLETES THIS PART:
Date of Request 5/7/2013
I PERMIT WRITERS -AFTER you net this form back
Check all that
municipal renewal
apply
x
from
PERCS if LTMP/STMP data we said should be
on DMRs is not really there, so we can get it for you
(or NOV POTW).
- Notify PERCS if you want us to keep a specific POC
in LTMP/STMP so you will have data for next permit
renewal.
- Email PERCS draft permit, fact sheet, RPA.
- Send PERCS paper copy of permit (w/o NPDES
bollerplale), cover letter, final fact sheet. Email RPA if
changes.
Re uestor
Teresa Rodriguez
new industries
Facility Name
New bern W WTP
W WTP expansion
Permit Number
Region
NCO025348
Washington
Speculative limits
stream reclass.
Basin
Neuse
outfall relocation
7Q10 change
other
other
check applicable PERCS staff:
Other Comments to PERCS:
BIRD, CPF, CTB, FRB, TAR - Sarah Morrison 807-6310
x
CHO, HIW, LUM, LTN, NES, NEW, ROA, YAD - Monti
Hassan 807-6314
PERCS PRETREATMENT STAFF COMPLETES THIS PART:
Status of Pretreatment Program (check all that apply)
facility has no SIU's, does have Division approved Pretreatment Program that is INACTIVE
facility has no SIU's, does not have Division approved Pretreatment Program
facility has SIUs and DWQ approved Pretreatment Program (list "DEV' if program still under development)
J2)3a) Full Program with LTMP
3b) Modified Program with STMP
additional conditions regarding Pretreatment attached or listed below
Flow, MGD
Permitted
Actua
Time period for Actual
STMP time frame:
Industrial
Most recent:
Uncontrollable
n/a
Next Cycle:
n
u
s :
0 1°
L
Parameter of
Concern (POC)
Check List
POC due to
NPDES/ Non-
Olsch Permit
Limit
Required by
EPA'
Required
by 603
Sludge* to
POC due
SIU"'
POTW POC
(Explain
below)"—
STMP
Effluent
Freq
LTMP
Effluent
Freq
Q = Quarter
= Monthly
BOD
4
Q M
TSS
V
4
Q M
NH3
4
Q M
Arsenic
4
Q M
Cadmium
V
4
Q M
Chromium
-/
4
Q M
Copper
4
Q M
Cyanide
4
Q M
Is all data on DMRs?
Lead
4
Q M
YES
Mercury
4
Q M
NO attach data)
Molybdenum
4
Q M
Nickel
4
Q M
Silver
4
Q M
Selenium
4
Q M
�
Zinc
4
Q M
Is data in spreadsheet?
Total Nitrogen
V
4
Q M
YES email to writer
Phosphorus
y
4
Q M
NO
4 Q M
4 Q M
4 Q M
4 Q M
'Always in the LTMP/STMP " Only in LTMP/STMP if sludge land app or composte (dif POCs for incinerators)
"' Only in LTMP/STMP while SIU still discharges to POTW "" Only in LTMP/STMP when pollutant is still of concern to POTW
Comments to Permit Writer (ex., explanation of any POCs: Info you have on IU related Investigations Into NPDES Problems):
Pretreatment request torn NC0025318.xex
Revised: July 24.2007

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NCO025348
Facility Information
Applicant/Facili Name:
City of New Bern / New Bern WWTP
Applicant Address:
P.O. Box 1129, New Bern, NC28563
Facility Address:
307 Glenburnie Drive, New Bern, NC 28560
Permitted Flow
6.5 MGD
Type of Waste:
96.5% domestic, 3.5% industrial
Facility/Permit Status:
Class IV/Renewal
County:
Craven
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
Neuse River
Regional Office:
Washington
Stream Classification:
SC -Swamp, NSW
State Grid / USGS Quad:
New Bern
303 d Listed?
No
Permit Writer:
Teresa Rodriguez
HUC:
0302020206
Date:
6/18/2013
Drainage Area (mi):
Lat. 350 OS' 20" N Long. 770 03' 3T' W
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
320.7
Winter 7Q10 (cfs)
Average Flow (cfs):
IWC (%):
3.04 (chronic)
90 (acute)
SUMMARY
The City of New Bern currently operates a Class IV WWTP with a permitted flow of 6.5 MGD. In
addition they operate a 5.0 MGD Water Treatment Plant discharging filter backwash and softener
regeneration backwash (0.5 MGD design discharge flow). The effluent from the WTP joins the effluent
from the WWTP before discharging through a diffuser to the Neuse River. Wastewater from the treatment
system can be diverted to a quarry from where it is used for irrigation of a turf farm. The reclaimed water
system is permitted under permit W00017635.
The current permit lists four outfalls but the draft permit includes five outfalls to capture the contribution
from different wastewater sources and total nitrogen credits. The outfall to the Neuse River is identified
as outfall 001. This outfall is equipped with a HDPE 100 foot long diffuser with ten risers, each with a
diffuser check valve at a distance of approximately 1,000 feet from shore. The remaining outfalls are
internal outfalls. Outfall 002 is the effluent from the WWTP. Outfall 003 is the effluent from the WTP.
The discharge from the WTP is tied into the discharge line from the WWTP after the pump station that
pumps to the quarry or the river. Outfall 004 was used in the previous permit to identify the flow to the
reuse system. In the draft permit outfall 004 is not included. A new outfall designated outfall 005 will
identify the flow and nitrogen load that goes to the quarry. New Bern will receive full credit for the total
nitrogen going to the quarry until a study is completed and alternative credits are established. Outfall 006
will also be added to the permit to capture the total nitrogen load discharged to the Neuse River.
The facility has a pre-treatment program with four categorical industrial users and two non -categorical
users with an approved flow of 0.23 MGD. The City will continue to implement the approved
pretreatment program.
Fact Sbeet
NPDES N00026913 Permit Renewal
Page I

RECEIVING STREAM
This facility discharges to the Neuse River in the Neuse River Basin, classified SC, Swamp, NSW waters,
HUC 0302020206. This segment of the river is not listed as impared in the 2012 303(d) list.
Nitrogen.
The Environmental Management Commission adopted Nutrient Management Strategy rules in December
1997, classifying the entire Neuse River Basin as Nutrient Sensitive Waters. The point source rule (T15A
NCAC 2B .0234) sets Total Nitrogen (TN) discharge limits for all point source dischargers larger than 0.5
MGD.
The rule also allows dischargers to form a group compliance association and work together to reduce
nitrogen; this option allows the association members added flexibility in controlling nitrogen discharges.
At the same time, the association is subject to a group NPDES permit ensuring that the association and its
individual members are accountable if they exceed the applicable nitrogen limits.
Under the rule, there are three types of TN limit in the Neuse:
1. the individual limits in the dischargers' individual permits,
2. the aggregate limit in an association's group NPDES permit, and
3. the individual allocations/limits for each Association member, also in that association permit.
A discharger may be subject to the first type of limit, or to the second and third, but never to all three at
the same time. The discharger is first subject to the TN limit (if any) in its individual NPDES permit. If
becomes a co-permittee to a compliance association's group NPDES permit, it is then governed by the TN
limits in that permit. If the association complies with its group TN limit in a given year, all members are
deemed to be in compliance with their individual allocations/ limits in the group permit. If the association
exceeds its limit, the members then become subject to their individual allocations/ limits as well.
Regardless of which permit governs a TN discharge, allocations/ limits will likely change over time as the
dischargers purchase, sell, trade, lease, or otherwise transfer nitrogen allocations. The Division will
modify the affected permits as necessary to ensure that the limits are kept up to date and reflect any such
transactions.
The City has an allocation of 64,2101b/yr TN. Table 1 shows annual loads to the river.
Table 1. TN Annual Mass Loading to Neuse River
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
TN lb/
18,788.524
59,226.166
60,991.562
43,381.572
57,602.301
Phosphorus:
The 2.0 mg/L Total Phosphorus limit is carried forward in the new permit as a quarterly average limit
with weekly monitoring.
DMR/COMPLIANCE REIVIEW
Outfall 001:
Outfall 001 is the combined flow from the WWTP and WTP and only includes monitoring for acute
toxicity P/F at 90%. The facility has shown excellent compliance consistently passing all the toxicity
tests.
Fact Sheet
N11DES NCO026913 Pennit Renewal
Pa«< '

' Table 2. Monitoring and Proposed Changes
' �I
-Pa ete`c
rangeoncii�reioug
�. _. �s, - r
__ r ' r___�
�a3�4 fad: C�`onc ho� hanger., r
i "Se it
t t /
a_T.... .-sue ,= s-
� Y s
i s..i +; arc,..., 1
�ilk� '�,..� t � ........
•,•.• i�""'i 1 !S IN
... ..�,u. ew-w- z �..#?,i.,.�. .....,
t ..S.i F
, �SYJ►i+!iI?tj.s.Y.� ,.: £,�....-�. .�.s,<..
t d 7. exZ.
.�:.^^�-"�� :�fi=ltx;z...:.-..t.x-= s,... '��.. �;t:.-»'' :Fii' "s»�^f?.�t.x.. i:.�<_
Flow
Add requirement to
DWQ will have a record of the flow to the
calculate flow
river.
Aquatic Toxicity
No changes
State WQ standards, T 15A 2B .0200
Outfall 002 (Effluent from WWTP):
The effluent from the WWTP can be discharged to the Neuse River or to the quarry. Data summarized is
the effluent from the WWTP regardless of the final disposal option. DMR data was summarized for the
period of January 2008 to December 2012.
Table 3. Data Summary Outfall 002
ram per= ;
Pa.. Y
. ilnits
A
Flow
MGD
3.61
14.8
0.005
BODS
mg/1
2.4
5.9
< 2
NH3N
mg/1
<5
<5
<5
TSS
mg/1
2.4
2.9
< 1
H
SU
8.2
8.4
7.7
Temperature
°C
14.7
29
7.1
TRC
1
86
4960
< 10
TN
mg/1
4.9
8.7
1.2
TP
mg/1
0.9
4
<0.1
Enterococci
#/100 ml
8.4
1426
< 1
Total Phenols
u l
< 2
< 2
< 2
Total Zinc
u 1
36
60
20
Selenium
u 1
< 10
< 10
< 10
Cyanide
u
<5
<5
<5
Total Copper
u 1
10.8
21
< 10
Total Silver
u l
< 5
< 5
< 5
Arsenic, chromium, molybdenum and nickel are sampled quarterly through the Long Term Monitoring
Plan (LTMP). All sampling results for the past 5 years have resulted in less than detection for all
parameters monitored.
Reasonable Potential Analysis 002:
RPA was performed for selenium, total copper, total silver, total zinc, and cyanide. The RPA and results
are attached to this fact sheet. Modifications to the permit based on the results of the RPA are listed in
Table 5.
Mercury Evaluation 002:
A mercury evaluation was conducted in accordance with the Permitting Guidance developed for the
implementation of the statewide Mercury TMDL to determine the need for a limit and Mercury
Minimization Plan (MMP). Based on dilution the allowable concentration for mercury is 822 ng/1. Annual
average concentrations are less than the calculated allowable concentration based on dilution (WQBEL).
The maximum concentration detected is less than the TBEL of 47 ng/1, therefore no limit is required. The
facility has multiple detections above 1 ng/L and discharges above 2 MGD, therefore according to the
permitting strategy they are required to implement a MMP. The permttee has 180 days after the permit
issued to develop the MMP.
Fact Sheet
NF'DES NC'0026913 Pennit Renewal
Pane 3

Table 4. Mercury Evaluation
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Annual Average (n )
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.3
< 1
Annual Maximum n
7.1
5.5
3.6
2.3
< 1
TBEL (n )
47
W BEL n
822
Monitoring and Proposed Changes:
Table 5. Summary of moni ring re uirements/ ro osed than es Outfall 002
Parameters Affected
Change from Previous
Basis for Condition/Change
Permit
BOD5
No changes
DWQ strategy for the Neuse River Basin
WQ Mgmt. Plan, 1998
NH3-N
No changes
DWQ policy/EPA agreement; 40 CFR 122
Federal requirement
TSS
No changes
NPDES rules for secondary treatment of
domestic wastewater: T15A 2B .0400
D.O., pH
No changes
State WQ standards, T15A 2B .0200
Total residual chlorine
No changes
State WQ standards, T15A 2B .0200
Enterococci
No changes
State WQ standards, T15A 2B .0200
Total Nitrogen
No change
T15A 2B .0234, Nutrient Mgmt. Strategy,
Neuse River Basin
Total Phosphorus
No change
T15A 2B .0234, Nutrient Mgmt. Strategy,
Neuse River Basin
Selenium
Eliminate monitoring
No reasonable potential to exceed the
Total Phenols
water quality standards, all samples were
below detection levels. State WQ
standards, TI5A 2B .0200 and DWQ
policy.
Cyanide
Eliminate monitoring
No reasonable potential to exceed the
Total Copper
water quality standards. State WQ
Total Silver
standards, T15A 2B .0200 and DWQ
Total Zinc
policy.
Total Mercury
Eliminate monitoring
2012 Statewide Mercury TMDL; no
reasonable potential.
Priority Pollutant
No change
DWQ policy, EPA application
Analysis
requirements
Outfall 003 (Effluent from WTP):
Table 6 summarizes DMR data for the period of January 2008 to December 2012.
Table 6. Data Summary Outfall 003
Parameter
Units
Average
Max
Min
Flow
MGD
0.115
0.749
0.0003
TDS
m
7289
12140
456
TSS
m I
7.7
40
2.5
H
SU
7.6
8
6.9
Turbidity
Ntu
3.7
22.4
< 1
Conductivity
umhos/cm
12.4
15.2
6.1
Fact Sheet
NPDI'.S NCO026913 Permit Renewal
Page 4

DO
m I
8.6
12.5
6.05
Temperature
°C
20
30
4
Total Residual Chlorine
1
20
47
< 10
Chloride
m I
4486
5479
2059
Salim
m l
7.12
8.8
3.29
TN
m I
1.07
1.38
0.43
TP
mg/1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Ammonia
M I
< 0.5
0.9
< 0.5
Fluoride
I
0.1
0.12
<0.1
Copper
m I
24
62
< 10
Manganese
I
210
673
19
Iron
1
250
779
50
Lead
1
5.8
14
< 0.5
Zinc
m I
49
1 176
10
Reasonable Potential Analysis 003:
RPA was performed for total copper, total iron, total manganese, total lead, and total zinc. The RPA and
results are attached to this fact sheet. Modifications to the permit based on the results of the RPA are
listed in table 7.
Table 7. Summary of moni ring requirements/proposed Chan es Outfall 003
Parameters Affected
Change from Previous
Basis for Condition/Change
Permit
TRC, pH, TSS, TDS
No changes
DWQ Water Treatment Plant Policy
Temperature, D.O.
Eliminate monitoring
DWQ Water Treatment Plant Policy,
effluent data has been within water quality
standards for the past five years.
Chloride
Eliminate monitoring
There is no water quality standard for SC
waters. The facility has passed all toxicity
tests.
Ammonia
Change monitoring to
DWQ Water Treatment Plant Policy
quarterly
Total Nitrogen
Eliminate monitoring
DWQ Water Treatment Plant Policy
Total Phosphorus
Salinity
No changes
DWQ Water Treatment Plant Policy
Conductivity
Eliminated monitoring
DWQ Water Treatment Plant Policy
Total Lead
Eliminate monitoring
No reasonable potential to exceed the
Total Copper
water quality standard.
Total Zinc
Fluoride
Eliminate monitoring
Most samples were less than detection.
There is no water quality standard for SC
waters.
Turbidity
Reduce monitoring to
DWQ Water Treatment Plant Policy
month)
Total Manganese
Eliminate monitoring
There is no water quality standard for SC
Total Iron
waters.
Outfall 004:
This outfall will be removed form the permit.
Fact Sheet
NPDES NOu036913 Permit Rene%val
Pa_e 5

Outfall 005:
The effluent to the quarry will be designated outfall 005. Daily and monthly flow are the only parameters
to be monitored.
Outfall 006:
The effluent from the pump station to the Neuse River before the junction with the effluent from the
WTP. This outfall will capture the total nitrogen load to the Neuse River.
INSTREAM MONITORING:
The permittee is a member of the Neuse River monitoring coalition therefore instream monitoring is
waived.
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS:
The application includes the results of three priority pollutant analyses. Chlorodibromomethane,
chloroform and dichlorobromomethane were detected at low concentrations. There is no federal criteria or
state standards for these parameters. These parameters will be monitored in the Priority Pollutant Scans as
required by the permit.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE
Draft Permit to Public Notice: July 3, 2013
Permit Scheduled to Issue: August 19, 2013
NPDES DIVISION CONTACT
If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact
Teresa Rodriguez at 919-807-6387.
NAME: DATE: °� �0�3
REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENTS
NAME: DATE:
SUPERVISOR:
DATE:
Fact Sheet
NPDES NCO026913 Pennit Renewal
Page 6

New Bern WWTP
NCO026348
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Outfall ,002
Qw = 6.5 MGD
Qw (MGD) = 6.50 WWTP/WTP Class: IV
1 Q 1 OS (cfs) = Modeled, IWC % defined IWC c@ IQ 1 OS = 3.04%
7QIOS (cfs) = Modeled, IWC % defined IWC @ 7QIOS = 3.04%
7QIOW (cfs) = Modeled, IWC % defined 1WC @ 7QIOW = 3.04%
30Q2 (cfs) = Modeled, IWC % defined 1WC @ 30Q2 = 3.04%
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) = Modeled, IWC % defined IWC @ QA = 3.04%
Receiving Stream: Neuse River Stream Class: SC
CHRONIC TEST CONCENTRATION = 3%
PARAMETER
STANDARDS & CRITERIA (2)
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
(1)E
a
z
NC WQS / Applied %2 FAV /
Max Pred
Chronic Standard Acute
n Det. Allowable Cw
Cw
Acute: NO WQS
Arsenic
C
10 HH(Qavg)
ug/L
0 0
N/A
-------------------
Acute: 1,381.E
Cadmium
NC
5 SW(7QIOs) 42
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Chronic:---- 164.5 --
--- ---- — -------------
Acute: NO WQS
Eliminate Monitoring
Total Phenolic Compounds
NC
300 A(7Q10s)
10.0
ug/L
54 2
5
------------------
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: NO WQS
Chromium
NC
20 SW(30Q2)
ug/L
0 0
N/A
_ _
_
Chronic: ---- 658 --
— - --- — — —---------
Acute: 190.8
Eliininate'monitoring
Copper (AL)
NC
3 SW(7Q10s) 5.8
ug/L
79 35
29.4
---- _ _
Chron--
ic:
-- — ---------------------
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: 32.9
Eliminaie monitoring, sample through LIMP -
Cyanide
NC
1 SW(7QIOs) 1
10.0
ug/L
79 0
5.0
_ _ _
Chronic----- 32.9---
-- — — — — - ----- -----
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: 7,269.7
Lead
NC
25 SW(7QIOs) 221
ug/L
0 0
N/A
_
Chronic----- 8_ 22.4
---
Acute: NO WQS
Mercury
NC
25 SW(7QIOs)
0.5
ng/L
0 0
N/A
_
Chronic: 822_
77. --- — — — — — — — — —
Acute: NO WQS
Molybdenum
NC
2.0 HH(7Q10s)
mg/L
0 0
N/A
_
Chronic----- 65.8--
-- — ---------- — -----
Acute: 2,467.1
Nickel
NC
8.3 SW(7QIOs) 75
ug/L.
0 0
N/A
_ _ _
Chronic: ----
--- --- -------------
NCO025348 RPA-002.xlsm,rpa
Page 1 of 2 6/28/2013

New Bern WWTP
NCO025348
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Outfall 002
Qw=6.5MGD
Acute: NO WQS
Eliminate Monitoring.
Selenium
NC
71 SW(7Q 10s)
ug/L
79 0
5.0
_ _
_': _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic 2,335.5
_
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: 62.500
Eliminate monitoring, sample through LIMP
Silver (AL)
NC
0.10 S W(7Q 1 Os) 1.90
ug/L
79 0
2.5
_ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _
Chronic: 3.289
79 values > Allowable Cw
Acute: 3125
Eliminate monitoring
Zinc (AL)
NC
86 SW(7QIOs) 95
ug/L
79 79
70.80
_ __ _—_—__
_— ________ _—__
Chronic: 2829
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute:
0 0
N/A
----------
— ------..-----
_
Chronic:
- --- - -
Acute:
0 0
N/A
Chronic --------------------------------------
Acute:
0 0
N/A
---------
--
Chronic:
-_---------------------
Acute:
0 0
N/A
— — --- ----------
Chronic:----------
------
Acute:
0 0
N/A
----------
------ — ----- ----- ---
___
Chronic:
Acute:
0 0
N/A
_
— --- — --- — -- ---
Chronic----------
Acute:
0 0
N/A
-----------
-----------
Chronic:
Acute:
0 0
N/A
_ _ ---------
-- — --------------
Chronic:
-----
Acute:
_
0 0
N/A
_ _
---- — --- -----"---------
Chronic----------
NCO025348 RPA-002.xlSm,rp9
Page 2 of 2 6/28/2013

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS - DATA
a
4
6
0
CyanlCa
Tedl PM1en011c Compounds
Chromium
Copper (AI)
OMe
Oub
B04120L n ults
pW
0. B04120L Rqulb
Deb 0.
SDL M0L P ub
=]8M
Oab OW
BOtn1201-
Rwulta
1
1I1W
x
5 old De
D.WDO
1
SW Da.
NO DATA
1 lwm <
10
5 SMOw.
1 122CC8
5 5
SW D.
0.0000
2
wams
2
5 Mean
SW00
2
Mmn
NO DATA
2 1I1D2W0:
10
10 Mean
8.0759
2 i/102008
5 5
Mxn
6 W
]
]KJLCOB
2
5 C V.
00000
3
C.V.
NO DATA
3 W4408
90
10 GV.
04no
J NRMS
5 5
C V.
D.0000
4
y✓lCOB
2
5
54
4
n
0
4 VIM0CS
11
11
]80
4 2/1LFtdb
6 5
]e
5
IyLHOB
2
5
5
5 SE2WB <
10
5
5 YB2W!
5 5
8
11M000
2
5 Mutt FectOr=
t00M
a
M. Faebr=
WA
0 Y1Y1008
10
10 Mury Fadar=
1.4
S Y132W8
5 5
MJ1 Fadon
1.0000
]
R( m
$
5 Mez. Value
50 ug2
]
Mez. VUue
0.0 upt
]. W4 o
10
5 M4z. Value
310 u,
] of a..
5 5
M¢ Value
50 up2
8
1..
2
5 Ma PreO Cw
50 uo.
a
IMA . Rtl Ow
WA uWL
8 w122008
10
5 Mez PIW C.
294 upM1
0 W1=008
6 5
Mn. P. CW
5.0 u01L
9
2H1W0
2
5
9
B 10Z2008
fl
13
0 f02i000
5 5
10
V@
2
5
10
10 tOq/10p8
13
13
f0 f0.9RDo
5 5
11
4R2Wp
2
5
11
11 11NM38
18
18
NR2W8
5 5
12
5111t0p9
2
5
12
12 11/13(1008
10
m
;l
2 1t11 i2000
6 5
13
022008
2
5
13
13 12I3121g8 <
10
5
13 1X120o0
6 5
14
7=000
2
5
H
14 12/11RW0
if
t1
14 1DII1 3
5 5
15
68RM4
2
5
15
15 lw1
10
10
15 loW009
5 5
18
W12N0
2
5
18
18 12 009 <
10
5
IB 1RNM30
5 5
1]
1ww2000
2
5
1]
1] 2'5/IDOB
11
11
1] V M
5 5
18
11/Br]000
]
5
18
10 2/I00000
18
10
18 2182W2
5 5
IB
1YL3009
2
5
IB
10 W000B <
10
5
10 9/420W
5 6
20
1/I1t010
2
5
10
20 wiB200B a
10
5
20 wl9
5 5
21
2/@Of0
2
5
21
21 4pRW8
14
14
21 4211008
6 5
22
3 010
2
5
Y!
Y2 4/162W0
tx
12
. 4118
5 5
23
4/150olo
2
5
23
2] 5/]2008 <
10
S
23 s/]r200B
5 5
24
bl&10t0
2
s
24
24 WM009 <
10
5
2a 5RVlMO
8 5
25
BR2010
2
5
25
25 N32009 <
10
5
35 flr3R00p
5 5
ZB
w1LA10
_ 3
5
2B
20 w1B2W0
11
11
10 Br1aROJi
5 5
27
WISG010
2
S
27
27 ]2200B =
10
5
2] ]RROOB
5 5
28
tMllOfo
2
5
25
2a 2fl2WY <
10
S
28 ]MKOB
5 5
20
111]/2p10
I
6
38
n wMWB..
11
11
A mono
6 6
30
12 0f0
2
5
30
30 w13200B
10
6
]0 81mm
5 5
3t
1M1011
2
5
31
31 Bry2W9
10
10
31 &3[008
5 5
32
2R=N1t
2
5
R
32 w1B.=N08 <
10
5
32 -loon W
5 5
33
30R011
2
5
33
33 10MWB <
1D
6
33 1ww8W
5 5
]4
An42011
2
6
94
m 'WIM000
14
14
34 tw1w2W9
5 5
w
wmoi1
2
5
35
35 llm=o
13
13
35 I1/S m
5 6
36
ww1011
2
5
m
30 llll ]B
10
10
30 1f11=009
5 5
37
M2011
2
5
37
W 1=2009 <
10
6
37 1YN2W3
5 5
30
wA=1011
2
6
m
38 t2tM <
10
5
JB 12/102WB
6 5
39
W14=11
2
6
3'
30 122010 =
10
5
3o t/]20f0
6 6
40
Iw132011
2
5
40
40 1114=10 <
10.
5
40 1/142010
5 5
41
1Moil
2
5
41
41 .=10 =
10
S
41 W4MIO
5 5
42
lwmll
2
5
42
42 111=10 <
10
5
42 W112010
5 5
43
11512 12
2
5
43
43 Y 010 <
10
5
43 Y 10
5 5
44
x 2
2
5
M
44 W;IM 0 <
10
5
44 3r1112 1O
5 5
45
YIM012
2
5
45
45 4II OW10. =
10.
5
45 41154010
5 0
40
4/61N12
2
6
b
46 4 010 <
10.
5
48 InMol0
5 5
47
532012
2
5
47
0 SW2010 =
10
5
47 y 010
5 5
48
OMM2
2
5
48
40 WIM010 <
10
5
40 ' 1.10
6 5
40
711=12
2
5
40
41 GWQ;fO
10
6
41&YIOt00
5 5
50
8QQ012
2
5
50
50 b92010 =
10
5
s0 BR2010
5 5
51
w1B2012'
2
8
51
51 &122010 <
10
5
51 8/122010
5 5
52
ION=
2
6
52
52 W152010 ==
10
5
52 WIWOID
5 5
53
111 2
2
5
53
$3 iwI2010 <
10
5
53 fw]20f0
6 5
54
t21Y1012
2
5
N
54 l =2010
10
10
54 f11Y1010
5 5
55
55
55 12 010 <
10
5
55 12/52010
5 5
56
58
58: 1,1231t.
11
11
55 1I 0t1
s 5
57
57
5I` 011
222
13
13
57 Yw1011
5 5
58
56
56 Y 11
10
s
50 011
YS
5 5
5o
No
50 414 11
10
42 5B 4/1011
5 5
W
BD
&SOO
21
21
80 us=
5 5
01
81
61 w82011
10
5
01 WSOO1
s 5
62
82
02 ]]1M
10
6
82 ]O/20fl
5 6
03
83
-
BJ wYTOtt'
10
18
03 ".w42m1
fi fi
84
04
&- Y1a12011
f3
1]
04 w14201t
6 5
0.5
OS
05 IMY1011
11
11
85 lwl=il
5 5
86
No 1122011
11
ii
88 1122011
5 5
w
01
W 1221101t
11
ii
W 12(/2pi1
5 1
80
88
BB -11=2 <
10
0
5e 1152012
6 5
60
00
80 222012 <
t0
5
BB 221d112
6 5
]0
70
70 LIMU <
10
5
]0 W1YN12
8 6
71
71
71 AWO 2
11
11
]1 41Y1p12
5 5
]2
]2
]2 =2
11
11
n SG4012
5 5
73
73
]3—OM012:!<
10
5
73 ew2012
0 5
74
74
74 7/1=12 <
10
6
74 711=012
6 5
75
75
25 0U2012 <
10
0
75 02Y2012
5 5
N
78
]0 w1wN12
11
tt
]e W192012
S 5
]]
n
n 10W2012
12
12
n 1w42012
s s
]0
]8
28 llB l
10
10
78 11/8201x
fi s
]0
]0
2B 1w 12 g
40
10
70 121w202
5 5
NC0025346 RPA OW2 Msm,Cala
Deb)

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS - DATA
Dne CO.
a01.t
12M00
6 5
2 i/102N8
B 5
] NRNB
6 6
4 2'14DOOB
5 S
5
5 6
'WO
0"'WON
9 5
64/N0
aNO W
6 5
0 &tL]008.
B 5
B tMRNO
5 5
f0 1MONB
6 5
11 I"WIDIN
S b
12 limWNS
6 5
13 1MON
5 5
N 121112NS
5 5
15 1IB2N0
5 6
la Vp/lpOp
6 5
1] 1IN
6 5
ie y1p2O0N
8 5
IB Y42Np
5 5
20 11p200p
S 5
5 5
1"No
5 5
23 MOON 5.120N
5 5
24 minmON
5 5
25 MN0
5
/1
&1&MO 20
5 5
]22N9
5 5
20
N
5 5
gi
30 MBBlNB
5 5
30 L132N9
5 5
31 BiY1NB
6 5
N N
b 6
IMpO
]3 1NNH
5 5
31 1
5 5
35 11WDOO
A2
5 5
38 11/122D6
5
37 1222NO
5 5
30 1lamio
6 s
30 11, 010
s 5
40
5 5
41 V4/20t0
6 5
42 IIQ01
5
31MOI0
43 J1312010
5
5 5
N Y112010
9 S
0 4/1Y1010
6 5
48 0
5 5
42 M01
5
6/1321
40 :%0
5
5 5
49 0(Y2010
5 s
N 62]tolo
s s
51 Btl22010
6 5
52 V52010
6 5
53 IW]20f0
5 6
& i192010
6 s
5 1M...
5 s
55 I
5 s
52 yl,?[)
6 5
58 3MM11
5 s
SO 4114*011
5 5
.1 5'52011
5 5
et
6 s
82 ]n20I1
7fing
5 s
53 pl4
6 5
Ol
&142011
5 S
N
N 10,132011
6 5
N 11/Y1011
5 5
67 t2n201t
5 s
00 141
5 5
69 M012
5 5
20 V132012
6 5
71 :IIN2o12
5 5
II M012
5 5
73 b02012
5 5
74 711=12
5 s
75 Mg)12
5 5
]0 -0/1B20 2
5 5
T 101=2
9 6
]0
5 5
'IJWO12
]9 3/ O 2
6 s
M.F.- t WOO
Mx. Value 5.0 ,,-
,ax Pree Cw 50 uy&
&122010
&152010
1 a]ncID
f t2rzma 'f
1verz3,c r
trtnon
2102c1t
322ov e
41142a1f
venal) i
>naml
v4rz3n
aurzml .
Wing, i<
IIW012
1/Sna1z
2
v1.11
l c
41 ,
12
v3n
arenc'._
Wng12
Much
pnerz012
1W4na12 4
1118na12 :
1vs2c13 <
BD4112DL
Mul.
Oele Dma
BD411DL
axu14
DeY DeM
BD4IIIDL
5
Md6
OCCN
1 VYA08
5 2,5
litd .
aDOW
I 1Y20p5
v
37
5
Mxn
5 WN
2 1/tOR000 :
5 25
Mean
25000
2 1/102000
:3.
20
5
CV.
OWN
3 waOO8
5 25
C.V.
0.0000
3 wnwo [
x
J8
5
n
]0
4 W142N0
5 25
n
]B
4 y1V1000
33.
32
5
5 3AVID08
5 25
5 3JM008
R
42
5
MMI FMw=
t.NN
5 WIWON
5 25
M. Fed.=
LOON
8 NY1N0
3).
33
5
Mar Value50
uyL
] "Wom
5 25
Mu. Value
25 go,
] 01
40
46
5
Mu. Rp Pv
S,O uA
0 WIMO0 :
5 25
Mx. Prw
2.S UO,
0 wmoo0
J3
30
5
B l=ON
5 28
B 1022008
41
5
10 1MON
5 2.5
10 1WMc00
V.
41
5
11 1118IN00
5 2s
Il tt/MN9
+6.
45
6
12 11/t W(NO .
5 2.5
12 11/1.1c1
11
43
3
13 1MON
5 25
I3 tM.l
+O
40
5
14 lVli Z00!
5 25
4 1D110o. S
Y.
30
5
15 lfi2NO
5 25
IS 1IB20c9
41
5
10 12YXN0
5 25
18 1222M9
T.
31
5
1] MONO,
5 25
I] iAv2...
R
42
5
18 y102NB
5 25
t0 yiM000
Y
30
5
1B 94n4N
5 2.0
IB. 81420c5
A
33
5
20 WIM00 ={=
5 25
20 311WOD `
:f4
34
5
21 4(lfXgi
5 2.5
21 412200a
31.
N
5
22 M182N0
5 25
2'2 vlwll2
3]
33
5
23 2I2�
5 25
2] N20CJ
+e.
40
5
24 5R12N0
5 25
24 Win.'
A.
28
5
25 N12NB !
5 25
25 M1 In
N
38
5
20 W1&2000 :a:
5 25
20 7111
33.
33
5
27 )22N3
S 25
2] ]22009
+2
42
5
25 '�
5 25
2B ]2ncc9
]]
37
5
MOM
30 B1=00
25
&1mog
A
28
S
30 d13e2
5 2s
30
30
J4.
34
5
31 g
5 2.5
M009
31 L''&320.
24.
34
6
32 /11WO00
5 25
1iv3009
31.
31
5
53 IMON, e
5 25
n 1W80009
11
42
s
34 11,W009 <
wWN
5 2.5
. ta15oal
n.
39
5
35 111Y2N9
5 2.5.
N
]5 11/SRON
]9.
39
5
35 i=0<
5 z5
3e 1v122oo9
3).
27
5
37 1] .�
5 25
37 12Yffi0Uc ..
20
20
5
W4
30 lyIN1w9 9 ".�
5 2.5
39 ty1M000
38.
30
5
30 m2010
S 2.6
39 1nrz010
M.
28
5
a 12tY2010
5 2s
40 vurza:0
ID.
2e
5
41 2/VKID
5 2.5
41 V420ID
20.
28
5
42 2/112010
5 25
42 2'1120I0
A.
N
5
43 MO10
5 2.5
43 M010
3s.
35
5
4 311IM 0
5 25
44 31112010
b
30
5
45 VISFNIO
5 2.5
45 V1520t0
n
v
5
I8 4222010
5 25
40 Y222010
a].
3)
5
47 M(il.
5 2.5
41 " 643/2010
33.
33
6
48 61182010 >
5 2.5
40 wimolo
M.
26
6
40 MOio
5 25
4B Nnol1
J5.
30
5
N &VNIa <
5 25
N Mol,)
>s
35
5
sl 0/,
5 2.5
51 2122010
+0
49
5
52 &152010
5 25
N fl1152010
5
53 10,"lo
5 2.5
53 1M2010
$
54 11132010
5 25
54 t1/32010 -
48.
49
5
05 ty0120f0
5 2.5
55 1 0f0
'.d.
50
5
53 Iwo11 a
5 25
i 1102011
55.
55
5
57 2N2011
5 25
A 2N2011
A.
N
5
55 122011
5 25
SO Y2201t
30.
m
5
50 41142011
5 25
50-. M1420u
20.
28
5
80 &WOII
5 25
60 W52011
+0.
40
5
61 8182011
5 25
B1 b0rz011
S.
55
5
N 7n2011
5 25
82 ]n12011
34
34
s
63 Ya2011
- 25
82 BVn011
11.
v
5
a m4fNil
s 2.5
" a1420u
m
33
0
85 twl3W1f ;<
5 25
.5. 1W13rz0ll
23.
23
5
x 111 oll
5 25
80 111=01,
4
20
5
87 IW2011
5 25
0] 1wa.I
W
N
5
N 1/W2012
5 25
88 1/ o'2
48
5
Bp 2n2012
5 25
88 2n120i.'
s
70 v132012
5 25
)0..13rsan
30.
N
5
71 MS2012
5 25
71 - 4/52012
R.
20
5
72 3fl=2
5 2s
72 59rz012
34.
34
5
)3 Mg 2
5 25
73 8520t2
32
32
S
74 711=12
5 25
74 Lt22012
31
N
s
75 3R2012
5 25
]s M012
31.
37
5
70 .1M012
5 25
70 811M010
30.
30
S
]] 10142012
5 25
p1W420f2
5
)8 12
5 25
]B "11/8.30f2
42
42
5
;111
]B 1M012
5 25
]0 IM,, 2
33.
N
Bxufb
SMCw. 81782
Mxn 3o..
C.V. 022,59
]0
Nu. Value NOW uBL
Mu. PrW Cw 70ON uyL
NCO025348 RPA-On xIsm,0.18
De1Cl

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS - DATA
6
Copper (AL)
•
7
Lead
•
13
Zinc (AL)
Date Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
•
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
• •
Date Data
BDL--1/2DL
Results
1
50 50
Std Dev.
16.4479
1
8
8
SW Dev.
3.0662
1
24.
24
SW Dev.
44.1063
2
41 41
Mean
23.0345
2
5
5
Mean
4.0172
2
26.
26
Mean
48.6897
3
39. 39
C.V.
0.7141
3
13
13
C.V.
0.7633
3
176.
176
C.V.
0.9059
4
10 5
n
29.0
4
<
5
2.5
n
29
4
to,
5
n
29
5
25 25
5
<
5
2.5
5
10.
5
6
23 23
Mult Factor =
2.3
6
<
5
2.5
Mutt Factor =
2.3700
6
27.
27
Mutt Factor =
2.6900
7
31 31
Max. Value
62.0 ug/L
7
<
5
2.5
Max. Value
14.0 ug/L
7
31.
31
Max. Value
176.000 ug/L
8
15 15
Max. Pred Cw
140.7 ug/L
8
<'
5
2.5
Max. Pred Cw
33.2 ug/L
8
15.
15
Max. Pred Cw
473.440 ug/L
9
36 36
9
6
6
9
130.
130
10
33 33
10
5
5
10
57.
57
11
35 35
11
<
5
2.5
11
49.
49
12
23 23
12
14
14
12
127.
127
13
<
10. 5
13
c
5
2.5
13
24.
24
14
55 55
14
<
5
2.5
14
32,
32
15
<
10 5
15
<
5
2.5
15
30.
30
16
25 25
16
<
5
2.5
16
98.
98
17
10 5
17
<
5
2.5
17
26.
26
18
17 17
18
<
5
2.5
18
20.
20
19
20 20
19
<
5
2.5
19
18.
18
20
17 17
20
5
2.5
20
28.
28
21
62 62
21
7
7
21
126.
126
22
14 14
22
5
2.5
22
56,
56
23
<
10 5
23
5
2.5
23
27.
27
24
<
10 5
24 --
5
2.5
24
22.
22
25
10 5
25
5
2.5
25
25.
25
26
<
10 5
26
5
2.5
26
22.
22
27
39 39
27
6
6
27
105.
105
28
14 14
28
5
2.5
28
56,
55
29
14 14
29
5
2.5
29
26.
26
RPA 003.xlsm,data
Dale)

New Bern wTP REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
NCO026348
Outfall 00,1
Qw = 0.166 MGD
Qw (MGD) = 0.17 W WTP/WTP Class:
iQ10S (cfs) = Modeled, IWC % defined IWC @ IQ10S = 0.10%
7QIOS (cfs) = Modeled, IWC % defined IWC @ 7QIOS = 0.10%
7QIOW (cfs) = Modeled, IWC % defined IWC @ 7Q10W = 0.10%
30Q2 (cfs) = Modeled, IWC % defined IWC @ 30Q2 = 0.10%
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) = Modeled, IWC % defined IWC @ QA = 0.10%
Receiving Stream: Stream Class:
CHRONIC TEST NIA ASSIGN 80% ACUTE TEST
PARAMETER
STANDARDS & CRITERIA (2)
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
TYPE
(1)
-�
a
NC WQS / Applied '/2 FAV /
Max Pred
n # Det. Allowable Cw
Chronic Standard Acute
Cw
Acute: NO WQS
Arsenic
C
10 HH(Qavg)
ug/L
0 0
N/A
_
Chronic:----10,000-Q -
77 -----------------------
Acute: 42,000.0
Cadmium
NC
5 SW(7QIOs) 42
ug/L
0 0
N/A___—__
-- — — —_ -- —
Chronic: 5,000.0 -
- - —
-
Acute: NO WQS
Total Phenolic Compounds
NC
300 A(7Q I Os)
10.0
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Chronic:----300,000 -
-- --- — -- ------
Acute: NO WQS
Chromium
NC
20 SW(30Q2)
ug/L
0 0
N/A
o----20,000--
Chr_nic-_ _
-----------------------
Acute: 5,800.0
Eliminate monitoring
Copper (AL)
NC
3 SW(7QIOs) 5.8
ug/L
29 21
140.7
-------------
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: 1,000.0
Cyanide
NC
1 SW(7QIOs) 1
10.0
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Chronic: 1,000.0
Acute: 221,000.0
Eliminate monitoring
Lead
NC
25 SW(7QIOs) 221
ug/L
29 8
33.18
_ _ _ _
Chronic 25,000.0
_ _
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute: NO WQS
Mercury
NC
25 SW(7QIOs)
0.5
ng/L
0 0
N/A
Chronic-----25,000
--- - ------------------
Acute: NO WQS
Molybdenum
NC
2.0 HH(7Q10s)
mg/L
0 0
N/A
Chronic:----2000.0—
----------- ----- — -----
Acute: 75,000.0
Nickel
NC
8.3 SW(7QIOs) 75
ug/L
0 0
N/A
-----
RPA 003.xlsm,rpa
Page 1 of 2 6/28/2013

New Bern WTP
NCO026348
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Outfall 003
Qw = 0.166 MGD
Acute: NO WQS
Selenium
NC
71 SW(7Q10s)
ug/L
0 0
N/A
_ ____—__ ___
— _ _ —_—__ -------
Chronic 71,000.0
Acute: 1900.000
Silver (AL)
NC
0.10 SW(7QlOs) 1.90
ug/L
0 0
N/A
_ __ _
_ _ _— _ _ __
Chronic: 100.000
Acute: 95000
Eliminate monitoring
Zinc (AL)
NC
86 SW(7Q 1 Os) 95
ug/L
29 27
473.44
_ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ — _ _
_
Chronic 86000
_ _
No value > Allowable Cw
Acute:
ntu
0 0
N/A
_ ----------
— -- — — — — ---
Chronic:
- -
Acute:
0 0
N/A
------------------ -------
Chronic:----------
Acute:
0 0
N/A
_
------------------ -------
Chronic:----------
Acute:
0 0
N/A
--------------------------------------
Chronic:
Acute:
0 0
N/A
_ ----------
---- — — ----------
Chroni_ c:
---
Acute:
0 0
N/A
-----------
-
--
Chronic:
--------_---
Acute:
0 0
N/A
— ---------------------
_
Chronic-----------
Acute:
0 0
N/A
_
— — — — -------------
Chronic:---------
-
Acute:
0 0
N/A
----------
--------- —
Chronic:
------------
RPA 003.xism,rpg
Page 2 of 2 6/28/2013

` 7
�vto�C apes )nc
Rodriguez, Teresa G/ e
CT
From: Templeton, Mike /ti
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 12:10 PM '-13 1013011-T
To: Hughes)@newbern-nc.org
Cc: [e-mail]; Blaine Humphrey; Jarman, Kristin; Rodriguez, Teresa;
Risgaard, Jon; Thornburg, Nathaniel
Subject: revised draft npdes permit - nc0025348
Attachments: 25348 compare drafts 1&2 20130923.pdf; 25348 permit draft2 20130923.pdf
Mr. Hughes —
Attached for your information is the revised draft permit for the New Bern WWTP & WTP. This version includes
provisions for nitrogen credits, as we agreed in our June 12 meeting here in Raleigh.
In revising the draft permit, we have:
• Drafted new language regarding nitrogen credits.
• Made other changes in order to accommodate nitrogen credits and to clarify the requirements for the various
wastestreams and outfalls:
• deleted outfall 004 and added conditions for new outfalls 005 (discharge to quarry) and 006 (net TN
discharge to river, with credits),
• added a flow schematic to clarify the location of all of the outfalls, and
O re -arranged the special conditions according to outfall number.
• Made minor changes for clarity and consistency.
The attached markup document highlights these changes, except for the re -ordering of the outfall conditions.
The gist of the credits provisions in Condition A.(5.) is that it allows 100% credit for discharges to the quarry during this
permit term and bases credits thereafter on a load estimation methodology to be developed by the City and approved
by the Division's Land Application and NPDES Units. Condition A.(5.) includes two *voluntary* submittals pertaining to
the continued credits: an initial framework document and the final proposed methodology. We discussed the final
document in the June meeting; the framework submittal is new and is intended to initiate more detailed discussions
between the City and the Division and ensure that the final methodology satisfies the Division's expectations and is
approvable.
The proposed changes are sufficient to require a second public notice of the permit, and you will have an opportunity to
comment on the draft during the new 30-day review period. The next round of notices will be processed in
approximately two weeks. However, we are providing you the draft permit in advance to allow you to preview the
proposed changes. Please notify Teresa Rodriguez no later than October 7 if you see factual errors in the permit or
believe the credit provisions are substantially different from our agreement. Unless you find fatal flaws in the credit
provisions, our plan would be to correct any factual errors and proceed to public notice.
I hope you will find this satisfactory. I will be out of the office until Monday, October 7, but will be glad to discuss any
comments or questions you have when I return.
- Mike Templeton
Michael E. Templeton, P.E.
Point Source Branch/ NPDES
Surface Water Protection Section
NCDENR - DWR Raleigh, NC
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Rodriguez, Teresa
From: Blaine Humphrey <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 2:01 PM
To: Risgaard, Jon; Thornburg, Nathaniel
Cc: Templeton, Mike; Rodriguez, Teresa; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; Greg Churchill
Subject: RE: Draft NPDES Permit and Water Reclamation Permit Modification - City of New
Bern
Thanks Nathaniel.
Blaine
>>> "Thornburg, Nathaniel" <[e-mail]> 7/18/2013
11:33 AM >>>
Blaine,
As requested, attached is a Word version of Permit No. WQ0017635 issued December 31, 2008.
Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.
Sincerely,
Nathaniel
Nathaniel D. Thornburg - Environmental Engineer III Aquifer Protection Section - Land Application Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
919-807-6453
919-807-6496 FAX
http://Portal.ncdenr.org/web/wg/ags/lau
DISCLAIMER: All a -mails sent to and from this account are subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: Blaine Humphreyfmailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 11:41 AM
To: Risgaard, Jon
Cc: Templeton, Mike; Thornburg, Nathaniel; Rodriguez, Teresa; [e-mail]; MajstoravichJ@newbern-
nc.or • Greg Churchill
Subject: Draft NPDES Permit and Water Reclamation Permit Modification - City of New Bern
Jon,
Per the conference call today with you and Jordan Hughes, we will work with the City to provide a mark-up of suggested
language for the modified permit WQ0017635, which was not specifically stated in the cover letter of the July 10, 2013
permit modification submittal. Is there any way to get the WORD file of the permit, to utilize the "Track Changes"
feature during the discussion/modification process? This would be easier/cleaner than "red lining" a copy, scanning and
sending to you for review.

Also, as we discussed for the draft NPDES permit, the City (with your
concurrence) would like to reword/modify items "c." and "d." under Article A.(5.) describing Outfall 006, on page 4 of 9
(attached). You had indicated you would discuss with Mike and Teresa to determine appropriate language for the
NPDES permit, coordinating with the modified Water Reclamation Permit. Item "c." leaves room for interpretation
apparently. Maybe this should be referenced under A.(4.), Outfall 005? You had also indicated the date the City would
start receiving 100% nutrient credit would be the date the modified WQ0017635 permit was issued, not necessarily
waiting until January, 2014. Item "d." could be left in, as long as the permit referenced was understood to be the
modified WQ permit, and not the old permit. If after discussing with Mike and Teresa, they require formal/official
comments from the City, Jordan can respond appropriately. Should they wish to discuss via conference call prior to
making any changes, we can set up the call with everyone. Thank you for your assistance.
M. Blaine Humphrey, P.E.
Project Manager
Rivers and Associates, Inc.
107 E. Second Street
Greenville, NC 27834
[phone] Phone
[phone] Fax
mail to: [e-mail]
website: www.riversandassociates.com
"You're either part of the solution, or part of the problem."
- Eldridge Cleaver
2

New Ne.,),&V4 0,,ol� � S/�i3
Belnick, Tom
From: Templeton, Mike
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 201310:59 AM
To: Poupart, Jeff
Cc: Bush, Ted; Zimmerman, Jay; Reid, Dianne; Matthews, Matt; Pohlig, Ken; Kane, Evan; Bolich,
Rick; Pohlig, Ken; Colson, Kim; Zimmerman, Jay; Deamer, Nora; Belnick, Tom
Subject: FW: new bern quarry project
0
RC5/3/13DletterJordan Hughes, New Bern City Enginee , to Chuck
Jeff —
You asked who needs to respond to Mr. Hughes's letter. This issue cuts across several program lines - NPDES & non -
discharge permitting, groundwater & surface water modeling, GW & SW standards, lake management, and special
studies, for starters — and we have worked collaboratively since at least 1998 because no one program has the range of
authority and expertise to handle it alone. It's safe to say that is still the case.
I am forwarding a summary I sent Matt after our last meeting with the City, in Sep 2009. The header lists the DWQ
players who were involved at the time. All are still with the Division but not necessarily in the same position. In his letter,
Mr. Hughes also cc'd the new section chiefs who have a stake in the issue.
I would suggest you start by polling these folks to see who can represent each program, then arrange a meeting for us
Ao bring ourselves up to speed and decide how best to respond to Mr. Hughes. I'm cc'ing all of the above plus Tom
Belnick on this note, so they can be thinking about it ahead of time.
MORE INFO. You can get an idea of our most recent thinking on all this by reading the summary below. The thread
includes comments from Evan Kane, and I got a couple more in a different thread:
Ken Pohlig: Depending on what kind of investigation he's proposing (more groundwater related, or more surface -
water related), we can direct him to the appropriate Section.
Rick Bolich: If i were the city, i would consider first modelling the probable N reduction in the quarry itself, and see
what that # might be before undertaking the much more expensive and nebulous GW model. They may not need
the GW model.
I have more info, going back to 1998, if you want to read up on it.
- Mike T
From: Templeton, Mike
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 1:08 PM
To: Matthews, Matt
Cc: Kane, Evan
Subject: FW: new bern quarry project
Matt - Here are a couple of insightful comments from Evan and APS that I would add to my note to you. Thanks. —
Mike T

From: Kane, Evan
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 12:53 PM
To: Templeton, Mike
Subject: RE: new bem quarry project
Mike,
Thanks for sending this up to Matt. I'd just add one of the points Jay brought up that I thought was most insightful - even
if the city undertakes a very sophisticated study, we (DWQ) still don't have a lot of confidence that it would provide us
adequate demonstration of nutrient reductions, and we really aren't in a position to say what it would take to allay
those concerns. Another point for the discussion with Coleen is to get a feel for how receptive management is to an
experimental nutrient reduction estimate in the midst of recent discussions about the success (or lack thereof) of the
Neuse NSW strategy.
Evan
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
A single sheet of paper generates a cup and a half of wastewater. Please think twice before you print this email.
From: Templeton, Mike
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 5:56 PM
To: Matthews, Matt
Cc: Bush, Ted; Kane, Evan; Bolich, Rick; Pohlig, Ken; Colson, Kim; Sauber, Jay; Deamer, Nora
Subject: new bern quarry project
T11Fritc
On Wednesday, I sat in on a meeting Ken Pohlig (CG&L) organized to discuss a request from the City of New Bern
regarding the quarry project. The APS, ESS, and Planning were represented as well. We concluded that you and Ted need
to talk about this and potentially elevate it to Coleen for some input.
The question is how to best handle a proposal we expect from the City to develop a model of its quarry system. Per our
agreement in 1999 or 2000, the City wants to develop a model to estimate how much nitrogen finds its way back to
surface waters; the results could result in nitrogen credits for the New Bern WWTP discharge. David Muse, the City
Engineer, has asked Ken how to go about developing and getting approval for such a model.
By the end of our in-house meeting, we hadn't figured out what the modeling requirements should be. I think we all
agreed, however, that developing an acceptable model presents a serious — and potentially expensive — challenge to the
City and its consultant (Dr. Richard Spruill, ECU). It appears that nitrogen could be removed by biological processes in the
quarry as well as by GW transport out of the quarry. We speculated that the in -quarry processes might get far greater
reductions and be easier and far less expensive to model than the GW processes. We were concerned that the City
might make such an investment to model both areas (someone speculated it would be on the order of $100k) only to
find that GW transport is insignificant. On the one hand, it's the City's decision to take on the challenge; on the other,
we don't want to give them false hope that this is technically achievable or that their effort will result in anything we can
use to quantify the credits they seek.
How we handle that issue will answer some of the other questions the City asked, that is, who will be the lead contact
and what will the review/ approval process look like. All of our sections are involved but none is ready to take the lead.
The project would ultimately require an NPDES permitting decision if we decide to grant credits. But, if the City takes the
modeling path, the lion's share of the work will be in the APS arena. Though Ken is the most familiar with the project,
CG&L is no longer involved with it and wants to step back and let the other programs take it from here. And ESS doesn't
want it — the quarry lake is more a treatment unit than waters of the state.

So, in the end, we chose to elevate this to you and Ted and get your thoughts. We expect this will need to go to Coleen
and , if you agree, are prepared for a subset of our group to sit down with you and Coleen to go into it in more detail.
Let me/us know what you think.
- Mike T
Michael E. Templeton, P.E.
Point Source Branch/ NPDES
Surface Water Protection Section
NCDENR • DWQ Raleigh, NC
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records taw and may be disclosed to third parties.

Summary of Part E. Toxicity Testing Data
Date
SSoecies Final Results
6/6/07
Pimephales promelas
Pass
9/19/07
Pimephales promelas
Pass
12/5/07
Americamysis (Mysidopsis) bahia
Pass
3/5/08
Americamysis (Mysidopsis) bahia
Pass
3/18/08
Menidia beryllina
>100%
6/3/08
Americamysis (Mysidopsis) bahia
Pass
Menidia beryllina
>100%
9/2/08
Americamysis (Mysidopsis) bahia
Pass
Menidia beryllina
>100%
12/2/08
Americamysis (Mysidopsis) bahia
Pass
12/10/08
Menidia beryllina
>100%
3/3/09
Americamysis (Mysidopsis) bahia
Pass
6/2/09
Americamysis (Mysidopsis) bahia
Pass
9/15/09
Americamysis (Mysidopsis) bahia
Pass
12/1/09
Americamysis (Mysidopsis) bahia
Pass
3/2/10
Americamysis (Mysidopsis) bahia
Pass
6/8/10
Americamysis (Mysidopsis) bahia
Pass
9/14/10
Americamysis (Mysidopsis) bahia
Pass
12/7/10
Americamysis (Mysidopsis) bahia
Pass
3/1 /11
Americamysis (Mysidopsis) bahia
Pass
6/7/11
Americamysis (Mysidopsis) bahia
Pass
9/13/11
Americamysis (Mysidopsis) bahia
Pass
12/6/11
Americamysis (Mysidopsis) bahia
Pass
3/12/12
Americamysis (Mysidopsis) bahia
Pass
4/10/12
Menidia beryllina
>100%
6/5/12
Americamysis (Mysidopsis) bahia
Pass
Menidia beryllina
>100%
9/18/12
Americamysis (Mysidopsis) bahia
Pass
Menidia beryllina
>100%
12/4/12
Americamysis (Mysidopsis) bahia
Pass
Menidia beryllina
>100%
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

ALDERMEN
SABRINA BENGEL
VICTOR J. TAYLOR
DENNIS K. BUCHER
JOHNNIE RAY KINSEY
BERNARD W. WHITE
DANA E. OUTLAW
December 20, 2012
NCDENR/DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Ctg of Xe(u Fern
0
4ree (Pnwrus of �Kvr� Mural= ?
FOUNDED 1710
Phone:[phone] www.newbern-nc.org
FA Pax 1129, Yeh1 Fern, ENT 28563-1129
Subject: City of New Bern WWTP
NPDES Permit Renewal Application
NPDES Discharge Permit # NCO025348
Dear Sir or Madam:
LEE WILSON BETTIS, JR
MAYOR
MICHAEL R. EPPERSON
CITY MANAGER
VERONICA E. MATTOCKS
CITY CLERK
KEITH M. FIASCHETTI
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
Enclosed is the original and two (2) copies of the NPDES Discharge Permit Renewal Application
for the Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Please review the information. If additional information is required, please contact me at 252.
639.7555 or Jordan Hughes, City Engineer at 252.639.7525
Sincerely,
Judytajtoravich
Operator in Responsible Charge
New Bern Wastewater Treatment Plant
Cc: Jordan Hughes, City Engineer
File
JM/jm
,�$tribing for `excellence

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
New Bern WWTP and WTP, NCO025348 Renewal Neuse River Basin
FORM
2A
NPDES
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
Form 2A has been developed in a modular format and consists of a "Basic Application Information" packet
and a "Supplemental Application Information" packet. The Basic Application Information packet is divided
into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A and C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or
equal to 0.1 mgd must also complete Part B. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental
Application Information packet. The following items explain which parts of Form 2A you must complete.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
A. Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.8. A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12.
B. Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Z 0.1 mgd. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions B.1 through BA
C. Certification. All applicants must complete Part C (Certification).
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
D. Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets
one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information.
E. Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E (Toxicity Testing
Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing.
F. Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any
significant industrial users (SIUs) or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F (Industrial User Discharges
and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes). SIUs are defined as:
1. All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 403.6 and
40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N (see instructions); and
2. Any other industrial user that:
a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works (with certain
exclusions); or
b. Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
C. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority.
G. Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G (Combined Sewer
Systems).
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE PART C (CERTIFICATION)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1.99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 1 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
New Bern WWTP and WTP, NCO025348
Renewal
Neuse River Basin
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART A. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION -FOR ALL APPLICANTS: _
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet.
A.I. Facility Information.
Facility Name New Bern WWTP and WTP
Mailing Address P.O. Box 1129
New Bern NC 28563-1129
Contact Person Michael R. Epperson
Title City Manager
Telephone Number [phone]
Facility Address 307 Glenburnie Drive
(not P.O. Box) New Bern, NC 28560
A.2. Applicant information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following:
Applicant Name Judy Maistoravich -
Mailing Address P.O. Box 1129
New Bern NC 28563
Contact Person Jordan Hughes -
Title City Engineer
Telephone Number [phone]
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
❑ owner ® operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant.
® facility ❑ applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works
(include state -issued permits).
NPDES NCO025348 PSD 08998R00 (Air Quality Permit)
UIC Other WQ0017635 (Spray Irrigation)
RCRA Other WQ0003417 (Land Application of Sludge)
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and Its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
Name Population Served Type of Collection System Ownership
City of New Bern 30.480 Separate Sanitary Sewer Michael R. Epperson
Total population served 30.480 - - -
i
�.i 12 Page 2 � f 22
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
I

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
New Bern WWTP and WTP, NCO025348 I Renewal I Neuse River Basin
A.S. Indian Country.
a. Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
❑ Yes ® No
b. Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that Is upstream from (and eventually flows
through) Indian Country?
❑ Yes ® No
A.S. Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant (i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the
average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12-month time period
with the 12t' month of "this year" occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
a. Design flow rate 6.5 MGD mgd
Two Years Ago Last Year This Year
b. Annual average daily flow rate 4.08 (12109-11110) 3.87 (12110-11111) 4.01 112/11-11112)
C. Maximum daily flow rate 13.86 12/09-11110 11.60 (12110-11111) 11.39 (12/11-111121
A.7. Collection System. Indicate the type(s) of collection systems) used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
contribution (by miles) of each.
® Separate sanitary sewer 100 %
❑ Combined storm and sanitary sewer %
A.8. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
i. Discharges of treated effluent 1
ii. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent 0
iii. Combined sewer overflow points 0
iv. Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks) 0
V. Other NA 0
b. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location: East Lake Quarry Water Reclamation -off Glenburnle Rd (Non Discharge Permit # W00017636)
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s) 0.076 (12111-11112) mgd
Is discharge ❑ continuous or ® intermittent?
C. Does the treatment works land -apply treated wastewater? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, provide the following for each land application site:
Location: Mackiiwean Turf Farm Reclaimed Water Irrigation Facility -off Hwy. 43
Number of acres: 193.19 acres
Annual average daily volume applied to site: 0.024 (12111-11/12) mgd
Is land application ❑ continuous or ® intermittent?
d. Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works? ❑ Yes ® No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 3 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
New Bern WWTP and WTP, NC0025348, I Renewal I Neuse River Basin
If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g., tank truck, pipe).
NA
If transport is by a party other than the applicant, provide:
Transporter Name NA
Mailing Address NA
NA
Contact Person NA
Title NA
Telephone Number NA
For each treatment works that receives this discharge, provide the following:
Name NA
Mailing Address NA
NA
Contact Person NA
Title NA
Telephone Number (NA)
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works that receives this discharge NA
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into the receiving facility. NA mgd
e. Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater in a manner not included
In A.8. through A.8.d above (e.g., underground percolation, well injection): ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, provide the following for each disposal method:
Description of method (including location and size of site(s) if applicable):
NA
Annual daily volume disposed by this method: NA
Is disposal through this method ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 4 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
New Bern WWTP and WTP, NC0025348, Renewal I Neuse River Basin
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
If you answered "Yes" to question A.8.a, complete -questions A.9 through A.12 once for each outfall (including bypass points) through
which effluent is discharged. Do not Include Information on combined sewer overflows In this section. If you answered "No" to question
A.8.a, go to Part B. "Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 mgd."
A.9. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number 002
b. Location New Bern 28560
(City or town, if applicable) (Zip Code)
Craven NC
(County) (state)
35 deg. 08 min 20 sec 77 deg. 03 min. 37 sec.
(Latitude) (Longitude)
C. Distance from shore (if applicable) 1400 ft.
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) 20 ft. minimum depth ft.
e. Average daily flow rate 4.05 mgd
f. Does this outfall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge? ® Yes ❑ No (go to A.9.g.)
If yes, provide the following information:
Number f times per year discharge occurs:
Average duration of each discharge:
Average flow per discharge:
Months in which discharge occurs:
g. Is outfall equipped with a diffuser?
A.10. Description of Receiving Waters.
304 days (12/11-11/12)
24 hours
4.01 mgd
varies (September -June)
® Yes ❑ No
a. Name of receiving water Neuse River
b. Name of watershed (if known) Neuse River Basin
United States Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known): Defer to drawing
C. Name of State ManagementlRiver Basin (if known): Neuse
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known): Defer to drawing
d. Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable)
acute Tidal influenced. Defer to DWQ for current flow information cis chronic _ cis
e. Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable): Typical values for sub -basin No.030410 mg/I of CaCO3
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 5 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
New Bern VWVTP and WTP, NC0025348,
Renewal
Neuse River
A.11. Description of Treatment
a. What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
❑ Primary ❑ Secondary
® Advanced ❑ Other. Describe:
b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
Design BOD5 removal or Design CBOD5 removal 98 %
Design SS removal 98 %
Design P removal 90 %
Design N removal 88 %
Other NA NA %
C. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:
Liquid bleach sodium hvaochlorite
If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlorination used for this outfall? ® Yes ❑ No
Does the treatment plant have post aeration? ® Yes ❑ No
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is
discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All Information reported must be based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QAIQC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QAIQC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart.
Outfall number. 002
MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
AVERAGE DAILY VALUE`
PARAMETER ~
`:
Value
Uriits
Value`
Units
Number of Samples
pH (Minimum)
8.0
s.u.
pH (Maximum)
8.4
s.u.
Flow Rate
6.030
MGD
3.34
MGD
108
Temperature (Winter)
18
°C
15
°C
19
Temperature (Summer)
25
1 °C
23
°C
19
' For pH please report a minimum
and a maximum daily value
MAXIMUMDAILY
I�E
DISCARG
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE -'
ANALYTI CAL
MUMDL
POLLUTANT
- MOD;
-
Coric:,.
Units '
_Cone:..
Units
- .
Nurbe�r ofi;
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
BOD5
4.1
m /L
<2.0
m /L
64
SM 5210 B
2.0 m /L
CBOD5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
DEMAND (Report one)
FECAL COLIFORM
10
MPN
<1.0
MPN
8
Colilert 18
1 MPN
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
4.7
m /L
<2.5
m /L
64
SM 2540 D
2.5 m /L
END OF PART.A.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE I) =T0 D.ETERM1,N- E WHICH OTHER- PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU ,MUST.COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 6 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
New Bern WWTP and WTP, NC0025348,
Renewal
Neuse River Basin
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART B. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION iNFORMAT{QN FORSAPPUCANTS',WITH A DE,SIGIV FLOW.GREATER THAN OR
EQUAL TO 0.1 MGD (100,000 gallons per day):,
All applicants with a design flow rate z 0.1 mgd must answer questions B.1 through B.6. All others go to Part C (Certification).
B.I. Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
150,000 gpd
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
The City has an annual program aimed at the rehabilitation of existing sewer infrastructure in an effort to reduce 1/1.
Proiects in this program include CIPP lining and manhole lining The has in-house CCTV and smoke testing operations to
help identify 1/1 locations
B. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information. (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
area.)
a. The area surrounding the treatment plant, Including all unit processes.
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater Is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping, if applicable.
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground.
d. Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within % mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed In public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed.
f. If the treatment works receives waste that Is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, and/or disposed.
B.3. ` Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all
ackup power sources or redunancy In the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, Including disinfection (e.g.,
chlorination and dechlodnation). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram.
B.4. Operation/Maintenance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, list the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractor's responsibilities (attach additional
pages if necessary).
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: L 1
Responsibilities of Contractor.
B.S. Scheduled Improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for Improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several improvements, submit separate responses to question B.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
a. List the outfail number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
NA
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agencies.
❑ Yes ® No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 7 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
New Bern WWTP and WTP, NCO025348
Renewal
Neuse River Basin
C. If the answer to B.5.b is "Yes," briefly describe, including new maximum daily inflow rate (if applicable).
NA
d. Provide dates imposed by any compliance schedule or any actual dates of completion for the Implementation steps listed below, as
applicable. For improvements planned independently of local, State, or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion dates, as
applicable. Indicate dates as accurately as possible.
Schedule Actual Completion
Implementation Stage MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY
- Begin Construction /NA/ /NA/
- End Construction /NA/ /NA/
- Begin Discharge /NA/ /NA/
- Attain Operational Level /NA/ /NA/
e. Have appropriate permits/clearances concerning other Federal/State requirements been obtained? ❑ Yes ® No
Describe briefly: NA
NA
B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD ONLY).
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide the indicated
effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is discharged. Do not Include information
on combine sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluent testing data must be
based on at least three pollutant scans and must be no more than four and on -half years old.
Outfall Number. 002
MAXIMUM,DAtLY
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
MIJMDL
POLLUTANT
METfIOD _
-
Nuinberof_
Units•
Conc:
Units
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL
COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA (as N)
<0.5
mg/I
<0.5
mg/L
4
SM 4500-NH3 D
0.6 mg/L
CHLORINE (TOTAL
20
Ng/I
<10
pg/L
4
SM 4500-CI G
10 pg/L
RESIDUAL, TRC)
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
9.5
mg/I
8.9
mg/L
4
SM 4500-G
0.1 mg/L
TOTAL KJELDAHL
1.34
mg/I
1.10
mg/L
4
EPA 361.2
0.2 mg/L
NITROGEN (TKN)
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
3.90
mg/I
3.30
mg/L
4
EPA 353.2
0.06 mg/L
NITROGEN
OIL and GREASE
<5.0
mg/L
<5.0
mg/L
4
EPA 1664A
6.0 mg/L
PHOSPHORUS (Total)
3.43
mg/I
1.40
mg/I
4
EPA 366.3
0.10 mg/L
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
753
mg/L
566
mg/I
4
SM2540 C
2.6 mg/L
(TDS)
OTHER
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
END OF PARTB.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAG:E, �I TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YO.0 MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 8 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
New Bern VW TP and WTP, NCO025348
Renewal
Neuse River Basin
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART C. CERTIFICATION
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to Instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained In the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Form 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application Is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
® Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
® Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
® Part E (Toxicity Testing: Biomonitoring Data)
® Part F (Industrial User Discharges and RCRAICERCLA Wastes)
❑ Part G (Combined Sewer Systems)
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CERT[F{CATION.
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision In accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my Inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
for knowing violations.
Name and official title Judy Ma€storavich-Plant Manager
Signature ,
Telephone number f2521639-75555/
Date signed I a2/ f0
Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
NCDENR/ DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 9 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
New Bern WWTP and WTP, NCO025348
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Neuse River Basin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART D. EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING DATA -
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies to the treatment works.
Effluent Testing: 1.0 mgd and Pretreatment Works. If the treatment works has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd or it has (or is required
to have) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the following
pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which
effluent is discharged. Do not Include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected
through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, these data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for anayytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate In the blank rows provided below
any data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant
scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old.
Outfall number. 002 (Complete once for each outfali discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT;
MAXIMUM OAII;Y DISCHARGE
AVERAGE`DAILY D[SCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MUMI31 "
Conc
Units
.Mass "
Umts°
Gond
Uriiits
'Mass:;
Units
Nnrriber a
of '
Samples
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE, PHENOLS, AND HARDNESS.
ANTIMONY
<3.0
pgll
<0.11
lbs
<3.0
pg/I
<0.09
lbs,
4
EPA 204.2
3.0 pg/L
ARSENIC
<5.0
pg/1
<0.18
lbs
< 5.0
pg/I
<0.15
lbs
4
EPA 206.2
5 pg/L
BERYLLIUM
<1.0
pg/l
<0.04
lbs
<1.0
pg/I
<0.03
lbs
4
EPA 200.7
1 pg/L
CADMIUM
<1.0
pg/l
<0.04
lbs
<1.0
pg/I
<0.03
lbs
4
EPA 213.2
1 pg/L
CHROMIUM
<5.0
pg/I
<0.18
lbs
< 5.0
pg/l
<0.15
lbs
4
EPA 200.7
5 pg/L
COPPER
12
pg/I
0.43
lbs
<10
pg/l
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 200.7
10 pg/L
LEAD
<5.0
pg/I
<0.18
lbs
< 6.0
pg/I
<0.15
lbs
4
EPA 200.7
5 pg/L
MERCURY
1.1
ngn
0.00
lbs
<1.0
ng/I
0.00
lbs
4
EPA 1631
1 ng/L
NICKEL
<10
pg/I
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 200.7
10 pg/L
SELENIUM
<10
pg/I
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 270.2
10 pg/L
SILVER
<5.0
pg/I
<0.18
lbs
< 5.0
pg/l
<0.15
lbs
4
EPA 200.7
5 pg/L
THALLIUM
<1.0
pg/I
<0.04
lbs
<1.0
pg/I
<0.03
lbs
4
EPA 279.2
1 pg/L
ZINC
41
pg/I
1.19
lbs
34
pg/I
1.02
lbs
4
EPA 289.1
10 pg/L
CYANIDE
<5.0
pg/I
<0.18
lbs
< 5.0
pg/I
<0.15
lbs
4
SM 4500 CN-E
5 pg/L
TOTAL PHENOLIC
COMPOUNDS
<2 0
pg/l
<0.07
lbs
<2.0
pg/I
<0.06
lbs
4
SM 510A & B
2.0 pg/L
HARDNESS (as CaCO3)
106
mg/I
3801
lbs
88
mg/I
2642
lbs
4
SM 2340 C
1.0 mg/L
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other metals requested by the permit writer
NA
NA
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 10 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION
RIVER BASIN:
REQUESTED:
New Bern VWI TP and WTP, NCO025348
Neuse River Basin
Renewal
Outfall number: 002 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUMbAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE;DAiLY DISCHARGE
-ANALYTICAL
:MUMDL
"Number
POLLUTANT
Units
Mass
Units
Conc:
' UnitsMass
Units
of
METHOD
_
Samples
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ACROLEIN
<100
pg/I
<3.59
Ibs
<100
pgA
<3.00
lbs
4
EPA 624
100 pg/L
ACRYLONITRILE
<50
pg/I
<1.79
Ibs
<50
pg/I
<1.50
Ibs
4
EPA 624
50 pg/L
BENZENE
<5.0
pg/I
<0.18
Ibs
< 5.0
pg/I
<0.15
Ibs
4
EPA 624
5 pg/L
BROMOFORM
<5.0
pgA
<0.18
Ibs
< 5.0
pgA
<0.15
Ibs
4
EPA 624
5 pg/L
CARBON
<5.0
pg8
<0.18
Ibs
< 5.0
pg/I
<0.15
Ibs
4
EPA 624
5 pg/L
TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
<5.0
pg/I
<0.18
Ibs
< 5.0
pg/I
<0.15
Ibs
4
EPA 624
5 pg/L
CHLORODIBROMO-
9.60
pg/I
0.26
Ibs
5.0
pgll
0.15
Ibs
4
EPA 624
5 pg/L
METHANE
CHLOROETHANE
<10
pg/l
0.36
lbs
<10
pg/l
<0.30
Ibs
4
EPA 624
10 pg/L
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL
<5.0
pg/I
<0.18
Ibs
< 5.0
pg/I
<0.15
Ibs
4
EPA 624
5 pg/L
ETHER
CHLOROFORM
45.30
pgA
1.62
Ibs
32.66
pgA
0.98
Ibs
4
EPA 624
5 pg/L
DICHLOROBROMO-
27.90
pg/I
1.00
Ibs
19.75
pg/I
0.59
Ibs
4
EPA 624
5 pg/L
METHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
<5.0
pg/I
<0.18
Ibs
< 5.0
pg/I
<0.15
lbs
4
EPA 624
5 pg/L
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
<5.0
pgA
<0.18
Ibs
< 5.0
pgA
<0.15
Ibs
4
EPA 624
5 pg/L
TRANS-I,2-DICHLORO-
<5.0
pg/I
<0.18
Ibs
< 5.0
pg/l
<0.15
Ibs
4
EPA 624
5 pg/L
ETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLORO-
<5.0
pg/I
<0.18
lbs
< 5.0
pg/I
<0.15
Ibs
4
EPA 624
5 pg/L
ETHYLENE
1
<5.0
pg/I
<0.18
Ibs
< 5.0
pg/I
<0.15
lbs
4
EPA 624
5 pg/L
CHLOROPROPANE
1,3-DICHLORO-
<5.0
pg/I
<0.18
lbs
< 5.0
pg/I
<0.15
Ibs
4
EPA 624
5 pg/L
PROPYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
<5.0
pg/I
<0.18
Ibs
< 5.0
pg/I
<0.15
Ibs
4
EPA 624
5 pg/L
METHYL BROMIDE
<10
pg/I
<0.36
Ibs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
Ibs
4
EPA 624
10 pg/L
METHYL CHLORIDE
<10
pg/I
<0.36
Ibs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
Ibs
4
EPA 624
10 pg/L
METHYLENE
<10
pg/I
<0.36
Ibs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
Ibs
4
EPA 624
10 pg/L
CHLORIDE
1,1,2,2-TETRA-
<5.0
pgA
<0.18
Ibs
< 5.0
pg/I
<0.15
Ibs
4
EPA 624
5 pg/L
CHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLORO-
<5.0
pg/I
<0.18
Ibs
< 5.0
pg/I
<0.15
Ibs
4
EPA 624
5 pg/L
ETHYLENE
TOLUENE
<5.0
pgll
1 <0.18
Ibs
< 5.0
1 p9/1
<0.15
Ibs
4
EPA 624
5 pg/L
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 11 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
New Bern WWTP and WTP, NCO025348
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Neuse River Basin
Outfall number. 002 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT.
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE:DA[LY
DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
' `METHOD'
MLIMDL
Conic.
Unity
Mass.
.'Units.
Come.:
Units
"Mass`
Uttits
Na�iiber
of
Samples
TRICHLOROETHANE
<5.0
pg/l
<0.18
Ibs
< 5.0
pgll
<0.15
Ibs
4
EPA 624
5 pg/L
1,1,2-
TRICHLOROETHANE
<5.0
pg/I
<0.18
Ibs
< 5.0
pgll
<0.15
Ibs
4
EPA 624
5 pg/L
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
<5.0
pg/I
<0.18
Ibs
< 5.0
pg/l
<0.15
Ibs
4
EPA 624
5 pg/L
VINYL CHLORIDE
<10
pg/I J
<0.36
ibs
<10
pg/l
<0.30
ibs
4
EPA 624
10 pg/L
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other volatile organic compounds requested by the permit writer
NA
ACID -EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL
<20.0
pg/I
<0.72
Ibs
<20.0
pg/I
0.60
Ibs
4
EPA 625
20 pg/L
2-CHLOROPHENOL
<10
pg/I
<0.36
Ibs
<10
pg/l
<0.30
Ibs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
<10
pgll
<0.36
Ibs
<10
pg/1
<0.30
Ibs
4
EPA 625
10 pglL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
<10
pgll
<0.36
Ibs
<10
pg/l
<0.30
Ibs
4
EPA 625
10 pglL
4,6-DINITRO-0-CRESOL
<50
pgll
<1.79
ibs
<50
pg/l
<1.50
Ibs
4
EPA 625
50 pg/L
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
<50
pg/I
<1.79
ibs
<50
pgll
<1.50
lbs
4
EPA 625
50 pg/L
2-NITROPHENOL
<10
pg/l
<0.36
Ibs
<10
pgll
<0.30
ibs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
4-NITROPHENOL
Y
<50
pg/l
<1.79
Ibs
<50
pg/I
<1.50
Ibs
4
EPA 625
50 pg/L
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
<50
pg/I
<1.79
Ibs
<50
pg/I
<1.50
Ibs
4
EPA 625
50 pg/L
PHENOL
<10
pg/l
<0.36
Ibs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
Ibs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
2,4,6-
TRICHLOROPHENOL
<10
pgll
<0.36
Ibs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
Ibs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other -acid
-extractable
compounds requested by the permit writer
NA
BASE -NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
ACENAPHTHENE
<10
pg/I
<0.36
Ibs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
Ibs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
ACENAPHTHYLENE
<10
pg/l
<0.36
ibs
<10
pg/l
<0.30
ibs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
ANTHRACENE
<10
pg/l
<0.36
Ibs
<10
pgll
<0.30
ibs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
BENZIDINE
<100
pg/l
<3.59
Ibs
<100
pg/l
<3.00
Ibs
4
EPA 625
100 pg/L
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
<10
pg/l
<0.36
Ibs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
Ibs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
BENZO(A)PYRENE
<10
pg/i
<0.36
Ibs
<10
pg/l
<0.30
Ibs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 12 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
New Bern WWTP and WTP, NCO025348
Renewal
Neuse River Basin
Outfall number. 002 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE ,
AVERAGE_:DAILY
DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
ANALYTICAL
ML MDL
Numfier
Conc
Units_
Ma§s
Units
Conc.
Units .
Mass
Units
; of :
METHOD',
.
Samples'
3,4 BENZO-
<10
Ng/l
<0.36
lbs
<10
pgA
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 µg/L
FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
<10
pgfl
<0.36
lbs
<10
pgA
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
BENZO(K)
<10
pg/I
<0.36
lbs
<10
pgA
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 µg/L
FLUORANTHENE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY)
<10
pg/I
<0.36
lbs
<10
pgA
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
METHANE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL)-
<10
pg/I
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
ETHER
BIS (2-CHLOROISO-
<10
pg/I
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
PROPYL)ETHER
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)
<20
µg/I
<0.72
lbs
<20.0
pg/l
<0.60
lbs
4
EPA 625
20 pg/L
PHTHALATE
4-BROMOPHENYL
<10
µg/I
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
PHENYLETHER
BUTYL BENZYL
<10
µg/l
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
PHTHALATE
2-CHLORO-
<10
pgA
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLORPHENYL
<10
pg/l
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/l
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 µg/L
PHENYLETHER
CHRYSENE
<10
pg/l
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
<10
µg/l
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/l
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
<10
µg/I
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/l
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
DIBENZO(A,H)
<10
pgll
<0.36
lbs
<10
µg11
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
ANTHRACENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
<10
pgA
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/l
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
<10
pgll
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
<10
µg/I
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/l
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
3,3-DICHLORO-
<10
pgA
<0.36
lbs
<10
pgA
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
BENZIDINE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
<10
pg/l
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/l
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
<10
pg/I
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/l
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
<10
pgA
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
<10
pg/l
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
1,2-DIPHENYL-
<10
pg/l
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
Ibs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
HYDRAZINE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forts 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 13 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
New Bern VWVTP and WTP, NCO025348
Renewal
Neuse River Basin
Outfall number: 002 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAX UM.DAILY DISCHARGE
AVE_ RAGE DAILYbISCHARGE':
POLLUTANT
ANALYTICAL
MLlMDL
,Units
Nttmher
Conc.
Units,
Mass
Conc.
Units
Mass
Units
of`,'`
METHOD
Samples
FLUORANTHENE
<10
pgA
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/l
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
FLUORENE
<10
pg/I
<0.36
lbs
<10
pgA
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
<10
pgA
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
HEXACHLORO-
<10
pg/I
<0.36
lbs
<10
pgA
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
BUTADIENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLO-
<10
pgA
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
PENTADIENE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
<10
pgA
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/1
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
INDENO(1,2,3-CD)
<10
pgA
<0.36
lbs
<10
pgA
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
PYRENE
ISOPHORONE
<10
pg/I
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
NAPHTHALENE
<10
pg/I
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
NITROBENZENE
<10
pg/l
<0.36
lbs
<10
pgA
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
N-NITROSODI-N-
<10
pgA
<0.36
lbs
<10
pgA
<0.30
lbs,
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
PROPYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
<10
pgA
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
METHYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
<10
pg/I
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
PHENYLAMINE
PHENANTHRENE
<10
pg/I
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
PYRENE
<10
pg/I
<0.36
lbs
<10
pgA
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
<10
pg/I
<0.36
lbs
<10
pg/I
<0.30
lbs
4
EPA 625
10 pg/L
TRICHLOROBENZENE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other base -neutral compounds requested by the permit writer
NA
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other pollutants (e.g., pesticides) requested by the permit writer
NA
END OF PART D F
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW'(PAd 1) TO ,DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM;2A YOU -MUST COMPETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 14 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
New Bern VW TP and WTP, NCO025348
Renewal
Neuse River Basin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must Include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results show
no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include information
on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR
Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements
for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any Information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a toxicity
reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested In Part E, you need not submit It again. Rather, provide the information requested
in question EA for previously submitted Information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods. If test
summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no b€omonitoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
E.I. Required Tests. (See Attachments)
Indicate the number of whole effluent toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
❑ chronic ® acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half Years. Allow one
column per test (where each species constitutes a test). Copy this page if more than three tests are being reported.
Test number. 1 Test number. 2 Test number. 3
a. Test information.
Amedcamysts bahia
Menldla berylllna
Americamysls bahla
Test Species & test method number
EPA 2007.0
EPA 2006.0
EPA 2007.0
Age at initiation of test
3 days old
10 days old
4 days old
Outfall number
001
001
001
Dates sample collected
March 12-13, 2012
April 10-11, 2012
June 05-06, 2012
Date test started
March 14, 2012
April 12, 2012
June 07, 2012
Duration
24 hours
24 hours
24 hours
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Method for Measuring the Acute Toxicity
for Effluents and Receiving Waters to
Method for Measuring the Acute Toxicity
for Effluents and Receiving Waters to
Method for Measuring the Acute
Toxicity for Effluents and Receiving
Manual title
Freshwater and
Freshwater and
Waters to Freshwater and
Marine Organisms, EPA-821-R-02-012
Marine Organisms, EPA-821-R-02-012
Marine Organisms, EPA-821-R-02-012
Edition number and year of publication
Fifth Edition, October 2002
Fifth Edition, October 2002
Fifth Edition, October 2002
Page number(s)
1-275
1-275
1-275
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
X
X
X
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
X
X
X
After dechlorination
X
X
X
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 15 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
New Bern WWTP and WTP, NCO025348
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Neuse River Basin
Test number: 1
Test number: 2
Test number: 3
e. Describe the point In the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
Effluent Outtall 001, combination of outfall 002 3
OOJ
After all treatment processes
Effluent WWI 001, combination of outtall 002 3
OOJ
After all treatment processes
Effluent Outfatl 001, combination of outfall
002 3 003
Auer all treatment processes
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
Acute toxicity
X
X
X
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
X
X
X
Static -renewal
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Salt synthetic water
Salt synthetic water
Salt synthetic water
Receiving water
I. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify "natural" or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
Salt water
Marine Mix,
40 Fathoms Sea Salt
Marine Mix,
40 Fathoms Sea Salt
Marine Mix,
40 Fathoms Sea Salt
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
0, 90%
0,46,67.5,90,95,
100%
0, 90%
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Yes
Yes
Yes
Salinity
Yes
Yes
Yes
Temperature
Yes
Yes
Yes
Ammonia
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable
Dissolved oxygen
Yes
Yes
Yes
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
100%
100%
90 %
LCso
>90%
>100%
>90%
95% C.I.
Not applicable
Not applicable %
Not applicable
Control percent survival
100%
100%
100%
Other (describe) Pass/Fall
PASS
PASS
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 16 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
New Bern WWTP and WTP, NCO025348
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Neuse River Basin
Chronic: NIA
NOEC
%
%
%
IC25
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
Yes
Yes
Yes
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DDNYYY)?
03/14/2012
04/12/2012
06/05/2012
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe:
EA. Summary of Submitted Blomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitoring test information, or Information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: I I (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
END OF PART E.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (O;_).'TO.DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 17 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
New Bern WWTP and WTP, NCO025348
Renewal
Neuse River Basin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually In the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results show
no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include information
on combined sewer overflows in this section. All Information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR
Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements
for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a toxicity
reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information requested
In question EA for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods. If test
summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
E.1. Required Tests. (See Attachments)
Indicate the number of whole effluent toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
❑ chronic ® acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half years. Allow one
column per test (where each species constitutes a test). Copy this page if more than three tests are being reported.
Test number. 4 Test number. 5 Test number. 6
a. Test information.
Menidla beryllina
Amedcamysls bahla
Menldia beryllina
Test Species & test method number
EPA 2006.0
EPA 2007.0
EPA 2006.0
Age at initiation of test
11 days old
3 days old
11 days old
Outfall number
001
001
001
Dates sample collected
June 05-06, 2012
September 18-19, 2012
September 18-19, 2012
Date test started
June 07, 2012
September 20, 2012
September 20, 2012
Duration
24 hours
24 hours
24 hours
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Method for Measuring the Acute Toxicity
for Effluents and Receiving Waters to
Method for Measuring the Acute Toxicity
for Effluents and Receiving Waters to
Method for Measuring the Acute
Toxicity for Effluents and Receiving
Manual title
Freshwater and
Freshwater and
Waters to Freshwater and
Marine Organisms, EPA-621-R-02-012
Marine Organisms, EPA-821-R-02-012
Marine Organisms, EPA-821-R-02-012
Edition number and year of publication
Fifth Edition, October 2002
Fifth Edition, October 2002
Fifth Edition, October 2002
Page number(s)
1-275
1-275
1-275
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
X
X
X
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
X
X
X
After dechlorination
X
X
X
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

V
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
New Bern WWTP and WTP, NCO025348
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Neuse River Basin
Test number: 4
Test number: 5
Test number: 6
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
Effluent Outfat1001, combination of outfall 002 3
003
After all treatment processes
Effluent Outrall 001, combination of outfall 002 3
OOJ
After all treatment processes
Effluent WWI 001, combination of outfatl
002 6 003
Attar all treatment processes
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
Acute toxicity
X
X
X
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
X
X
X
Static -renewal
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Salt synthetic water
Salt synthetic water
Salt synthetic water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify "natural' or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
Salt water
Marine Mix
40 Fathoms Sea Salt
Marine Mix
40 Fathoms Sea Salt
Marine Mix
40 Fathoms Sea Salt
J. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
0,45,67.5,90,95
100%
0,90%
0,45,67.5,90,95
100 /o
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
X
X
X
Salinity
X
X
X
Temperature
X
X
X
Ammonia
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Dissolved oxygen
X
X
X
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
100%
100%
100%
LCso
>100%
>90%
>100%
95% C.I.
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Control percent survival
106 %
100%
100%
Other (describe) Pass/Fall
PASS
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
New Bern WWTP and WTR NCO025348
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Neuse River Basin
Chronic: NIA
NOEC
%
%
%
IC25
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
Yes
Yes
Yes
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DD/YYYY)?
06/07/2012
09/19/2012
09/19/2012
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe:
E.4. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the Information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: / / (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
END' OF,PART E.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (P,_,A�GE 1j Tt0 DETERl11lINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YC?l�'�MUST COMPLPTE..,
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
New Bern WWTP and WTP, NCO025348
Renewal
Neuse River Basin
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION.
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC
requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question EA for previously submitted Information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted In place of Part E.
If no biomonitodng data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
E.I. Required Tests. (See Attachments)
Indicate the number of whole effluent toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
❑ chronic ® acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half years. Allow one
column per test (where each species constitutes a test). Copy this page If more than three tests are being reported.
Test number 7 Test number. 8 Test number.
a. Test Information.
Americamysis bahia
Menidla beryllina
Test Species S test method number
EPA 2007.0
EPA 2006.0
Age at initiation of test
3 days old
11 days old
Outfall number
001
001
Dates sample collected
December 4-5, 2012
December 4-5, 2012
Date test started
December 6, 2012
December 6, 2012
Duration
24 hours
24 hours
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Method for Measuring the Acute Toxicity
Method for Measuring the Acute Toxicity
for Effluents and Receiving Waters to
for Effluents and Receiving Waters to
Manual title
Freshwater and
Freshwater and
Marine Organisms, EPA-821-R-02-012
Marine Organisms, EPA-821-R-02-012
Edition number and year of publication
Fifth Edition, October 2002
Fifth Edition, October 2002
Page number(s)
1-275
1-275
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
X
X
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
After disinfection
X
X
After Dechlorination
X
X
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

a
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
New Bern WWTP and WTP, NCO025348
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Neuse River Basin
Test number: 7
Test number: 8
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
Effluent Outfall 001, combination of outfall 002 3
003
After all treatment processes
Emuent outra0 001, combination of outfell 002 3
003
After all treatment processes
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or bath
Chronic toxicity
Acute toxicity
X
X
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
X
X
Staticrrenewal
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Salt synthetic water
Salt synthetic water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify "natural" or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
Salt water
Marine Mix,
40 Fathoms Sea Salt
Marine Mix,
40 Fathoms Sea Salt
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
0, 90%
0, 45, 67.5, 90, 95,100%
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
X
X
Salinity
X
X
Temperature
X
X
Ammonia
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Dissolved oxygen
X
X
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival In 100°%
effluent
100 %
100 %
LCso
>90 %
>100%
95°% C.I.
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
%
Control percent survival
100 %
100 %
%
Other (describe) Pass/Fall
Pass
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
New Bern VW TP and WTP, NCO025348
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Neuse River Basin
Chronic: NIA
NOEC
%
%
%
IC25
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Yes
Yes
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
Yes
Yes
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DDNYYY)?
12/0612012
12106/2012
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe:
EA. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted blomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: / / (MWDDNYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
END OF PART.E
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAG5RMjNE..W ICK'OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A-YOU �MUiS;i G;OMP�I�ETE.
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
New Bern WWTP and WTP, NCO025348
Renewal
Neuse
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.I. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 2
b. Number of CIUs. 4
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: BSH Home Aooliances — Dishwasher Facility
Mailing Address: 100 Bosch Boulevard
New Bern NC 28560
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Manufactures dishwashersThis includes Pans washing metal cutting forming welding general assembly and product testing
F.6. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Dishwashers
Raw material(s): Stainless carbon galvanized steel Bitumen plastic cleaners and lubricants
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
6000 gpd (85 % continuous or 15 % intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
5000 gpd (85 % continuous ar 15 % intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
NA
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA fortes 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
New Bern WWTP and WTP, NCO025348 Renewal Neuse River Basin
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following Information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
FA Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: BSH Home Appliances Range Facility
Mailing Address: 100 Bosch Blvd.
New Bern, NC 28562
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Manufacturing cooking appliances
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Matr ial(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Stove tops and built in ovens
Raw material(s): galvanized stainless steel sheet metal Plastics glass wires enameling materials and controls
F.S. Flow Rate.
k. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge Is continuous or Intermittent.
3000 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
I. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
2000 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 466.15
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, Interference) at the treatment works In the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
New Bern WWTP and WTP, NCO025348 Renewal Neuse River Basin
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following Information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.S and
provide the Information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Chatsworth Products Incorporated
Mailing Address:
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Manufacturina of structural support systems for data communication and computer equipment
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Matedal(s). Describe all of the pdncipal processes and raw matedals that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Storage racks cabling managers and steel cabinets
Raw matedal(s): aluminum steel and Powder Paint
F.6. Flow Rate.
e. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
3,000 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
f. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
F.S. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
New Bern WWTP and WTP, NCO025348 Renewal Neuse River Basin
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following Information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatmentworks, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Coastal Regional Solid Waste Management Authority
Mailing Address: P 0. Box 128
Cove City, NC 28523
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Leachate from regional landfill
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): None
Raw malerial(s): None
F.6. Flow Rate.
g. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
30,000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
It. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
New Bern WVVTP and WTP, NCO025348 Renewal Neuse River Basin
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the Information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Made Milk and Ice Cream Company
Mailing Address: P. O. Drawer S
New Bern, NC 28560
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Dairy Product processing
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal producl(s): Milk juice and tea
Raw material(s): milk sugar, flavorings corn sweeteners coca Powder, whey Powder, stabilizers and emulsifiers
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
26,000 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
30,000 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: RIVER BASIN:
New Bern WWTP and WTP, NCO025348 Renewal Neuse River Basin
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Moen Incorporated
Mailing Address: 101 Industrial Drive
New Bern, NC 28562
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Manufacturing of Plumbing Products
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Matarial(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Faucets and Plumbing accessories
Raw material(s): brass and cooper
F.6. Flow Rate.
C. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
10,000 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
d. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
10,000 gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Loral limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, Interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.

I
ACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
-J
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
New Bern WWTP & WTP, NCO025348
Renewal
Neuse
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SILL Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ® No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remedlation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRAIor other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 19 of 22