20160405 Ver 1_AllianceHeadwaters_97086_MY4_2023_20240214

MONITORING REPORT (MY4)

ALLIANCE HEADWATERS MITIGATION SITE
Johnston County, North Carolina

NCDEQ Contract No. 6832
DWR ID No. 20160405
DMS ID No. 97086
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2016-00882
RFP No. 16-006477

Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201

Data Collection: January - October 2023
Submission: February 2024

Prepared for:

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1652

Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina
Ph: [phone]
Fx: [phone]
1101 Haynes St., Suite 211 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • www.restorationsystems.com • Ph 919.755.9490 • Fx 919.755.9492
Response to Monitoring Year 4 (2023) DMS Comments
Alliance Headwaters Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site (DMS #97086)
Neuse River Basin 03020201, Johnston County
Contract No. 6832

Comments Received (Black Text) & Responses (Blue Text)

Report & Field Visit:
1. Due to the most recent groundwater data, have there been additional wetlands identified to be at risk?
Please denote wetlands at risk in the asset table.
Response: MY4 groundwater data has been assessed with relation to 2024 climatic conditions along with
previous monitoring years’ groundwater data including the on-site reference gauge. RS is preparing a
mitigation plan addendum/amendment to propose additional wetland monitoring parameters and
hydroperiod success criteria for the wetland assets. As a result, 9 wetland areas (1.755 acres) have been
determined to be at risk and denoted on the asset table. Wetlands at risk have been separated into two
categories “At-Risk of Credit Removal” and “At-Risk of Partial Credit Reduction” these areas have been
added to the asset table.

2. CCPV – Please map the at-risk wetlands.
Response: The wetlands at risk referenced in the response to comment 1 have been symbolized on the
CCPV.

3. Table 11. Verification of Bankfull Events –
a. Please verify that that UT2 had a bankfull event on March 16, 2021. Photo # 12 which is referenced is
labeled as UT4.
Response: The UT2 trail camera did not capture the event in progress, however, UT2 stream gauge data
did capture the event. Therefore, this event was documented on UT1, UT2, UT3, and UT4. The table
has been updated for clarity.

b. List all tributaries that have met bankfull. It is recommended to add a new column on which tributaries
have meet.
Response: A column was added to Table 11 to indicate the tributary (or tributaries) where each bankfull
event was documented.

Digital Comments:
1. The digital data submission is missing summary tables (tables 2, 10, 11, & 12 in PDF report submitted) and
dedicated photo point photos if applicable, please submit missing components.
Response: An excel file containing Tables 1-4 was added to a “Background Tables” folder and an excel file
containing Tables 10-12 was added to the “Hydrology” folder in the digital submittal. No permanent photo
points were established in the mitigation plan other than cross-sections and veg plot photos.

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Executive Summary
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
Alliance Headwaters -- Year 4 (2023) Monitoring Summary

General Notes
• No encroachment was identified in Year 4.
• No evidence of nuisance animal activity (i.e., beaver, heavy deer browsing, etc.) was observed.

Streams
• Stream measurements were not performed in Year 4 (2023), in accordance with the monitoring
schedule.

• A visual assessment indicates that across the Site, all in-stream structures are intact and
functioning as designed and that channel geometry compares favorably with the proposed
conditions outlined in the Detailed Restoration Plan and as constructed. No stream areas of
concern were identified during Year 4 (2023) monitoring. Tables for Year 3 (2022) data and annual
quantitative assessments are included in Appendix D.

• All seven flow gauges recorded continuous flow for more than the 30-days. Recorded flow periods
ranged from 63 to 143 consecutive days (Appendix E).

• Two bankfull events were documented in Year 4 (2023) monitoring. Six bankfull events have been
recorded to date, with at least one occurring in all four monitoring years (Table 16, Appendix E).

Wetlands
• Thirteen of thirty-six groundwater gauges met success criteria for the Year 4 (2023) monitoring
period (Appendix E). The on-site reference gauge met success criteria in Year 4 (2023), with a
hydroperiod of 49 days (19.7%). Rainfall data indicate relatively dry conditions leading up to the
start of the 2023 growing season: on-site precipitation was near or below the 30th percentile in
January, February, March, and May, according to WETS data (Appendix E). However, across the
Site, the development of herbaceous hydrophytic species remains abundant.
• Wetland At-Risk have been added to the asset table and CCPV with two designations (“At-Risk of
Credit Removal” and “At-Risk of Partial Credit Reduction”). RS is preparing a Mitigation Plan
Addendum/Amendment to discuss areas and propose a path forward.

Vegetation
• In accordance with the monitoring schedule, vegetation plot monitoring was not performed in Year
4 (2023). Woody vegetation continues to thrive across the Site, with stem heights reaching 10+
feet in some areas. No areas of vegetation concern were identified in Year 4 (2023).

Site Maintenance Report (2023)
Invasive Species Work Maintenance work
05/12/2023
Pine thinning (UT1-Reach 3 and UT3-Reach 2)

08/28/2023
Cattail (sporadic locations across the Site)

07/31/23, 09/11/2023, 09/13/2023
Boundary visibility improvement

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Executive Summary
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
Site Monitoring Activity and Reporting History
Project Millstones
Stream
Monitoring
Complete
Vegetation
Monitoring
Complete
Wetland
Monitoring
Data Analysis
Complete
Completion
or Delivery
Construction Earthwork -- -- -- -- July 31, 2019
Planting -- -- -- -- January 16, 2020
As-Built Documentation Dec. 11-16, 2020 Jan. 16-17, 2020 -- January 2020 March 2020
Year 1 Monitoring July 23, 2020 July 27-28, 2020 Jan. – Nov. 2020 November 2020 January 2021
Year 2 Monitoring March 10, 2021 July 6, 2021 Jan. – Nov. 2021 November 2021 December 2021
Year 3 Monitoring May 19, 2022 June 29-July 1,
2022 Jan. – Nov. 2022 November 2022 February 2023
Year 4 monitoring NA NA Jan. – Nov 2023 November 2023 December 2023

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Executive Summary
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024

MONITORING REPORT (MY4)

ALLIANCE HEADWATERS MITIGATION SITE
Johnston County, North Carolina

NCDEQ Contract No. 6832
DWR ID No. 20160405
DMS ID No. 97086
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2016-00882
RFP No. 16-006477

Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201

Data Collection: January - October 2023
Submission: February 2024

Prepared for:

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
1652 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1652

Prepared by:

And

Restoration Systems, LLC Axiom Environmental, Inc.
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211 218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Contact: Raymond Holz Contact: Grant Lewis
919-755-9490 (phone) 919-215-1693 (phone)
919-755-9492 (fax)

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Table of Contents page i
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................1
1.1 PROJECT GOALS & OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................. 1
1.2 PROJECT BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................... 1
1.3 PROJECT COMPONENTS AND STRUCTURE.................................................................................................... 2
1.4 SUCCESS CRITERIA .................................................................................................................................. 2
2.0 METHODS....................................................................................................................................3
2.1 MONITORING ......................................................................................................................................... 4
3.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................7

APPENDICES

Appendix A. Background Tables and Map
Figure 1. Site Location
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation
Units
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting
History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table

Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figures 2 & 2A-2B. Current Conditions Plan
View
Tables 5A-5H. Visual Stream Morphology
Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment

Appendix D. Hydrology Data
Tables 10A-G. Channel Evidence
Stream Gauge Graphs
Table 11. Verification of Bankfull Events
Figure E1. 30/70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall
Soil Temperature Graph
Table 12. Groundwater Hydrology Data
Groundwater Gauge Graphs

Appendix E. Site Photo Log

Appendix F. IRT Correspondence
2022-10-20. MY2 (2021) and MY3 (2022) IRT
Site Visit Notes

Appendix C. Stream Geomorphology Data
Tables 7A-7E. Baseline Stream Data
Summary
Tables 8A-8D. Monitoring Data-Dimensional
Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters-
Cross-sections)
Tables 9A-9E. Monitoring Data-Stream
Reach Data Summary

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) page 1
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
Restoration Systems, LLC (RS) has established the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS)
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site (Site).

1.1 Project Goals & Objectives
Project goals and associated objectives are summarized in Table A.

Table A: Summary of Goals and Objectives for the Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Project
Goals Objectives Pre-construction
Functional Status
Post-construction
Functional Status
Goals Specific to the Neuse River and Hannah Creek Watershed Discussed in the
RBRP (NCDMS 2010 and 2015) and Neuse River Basinwide Plan (NCDWQ 2009)
Remove Direct
Nutrient Inputs
from
Agricultural
Lands
• Restoration and enhancement of minimum 50-foot
riparian buffers along all Project reaches
• Protection of riparian buffers with a perpetual
conservation easement
• Reducing the amount of land in active row crop agriculture
• Decreasing drainage to restore wetlands, promoting higher
water table conditions, and denitrification
Not Functioning Functioning
Remove Direct
Sediment
Inputs from
Agricultural
Lands
• Restoration of stabilized headwater stream systems
• Restoration of wetlands and riparian buffers to filter runoff
• Increase the distance between active farming operations
and receiving waters
• Stabilization of gullies and ditches
Not Functioning Functioning
Additional Benefits to Hannah Creek Significant Natural Heritage Area
Improved
Aquatic
Habitats
• Restoration of appropriate bed form diversity, headwater
stream/wetland form, and in-stream structures to provide
suitable habitat
• Restoration of self-sustaining stream/wetland headwaters
• Restoration of riparian buffer vegetation to provide organic
matter and shade
Not Functioning Functioning
Improved
Connectivity
• Restore connectivity to historic remnant channel features.
• Improved aquatic connectivity to Hannah Creek Not Functioning Functioning

1.2 Project Background
The Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site (Site) is in Johnston County, approximately six miles southeast of
Four Oaks and one mile east of US 701 (Figure 1, Appendix A). The Project is located within the NC Division
of Mitigation Services (DMS) targeted watershed for the Neuse River Basin Hydrologic Unit (HU)
03020201150020 and the NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) subbasin 03-04-04.

The Site has existed in its pre-construction condition since approximately 2005. A review of historic aerials
of the Site, and adjacent parcels, taken in 1939, 1965, 1971, 1988, and 2005, revealed that while
agriculture was prevalent in the area, much of the Site was not converted to agricultural uses until after
1997/1998. Additional aerial photographs from Google Earth show that before construction, the project
Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) page 2
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
site had been manipulated for agricultural production numerous times between 1997/1998 and 2019.
The channelization of perimeter ditches to carry stream flow undermined the hydrologic connection
between the headwaters of UT3 and UT4 (located in the forested sections of the Site) from their
downstream channels. In addition, two small impoundments were excavated on the historical flow paths
of UT1 and UT3 during this time.

Current land use near the Site is predominately agriculture (crop and livestock production) and
silviculture. While the Site is near (< 6 miles) to two major interstates (I-95 and I-40), there are no
foreseeable signs of impending land use changes or development pressure that would impact the Project's
watershed. The conservation easement will eliminate the potential for future development and/or
agricultural use in the floodplain areas of the restored streams.

1.3 Project Components and Structure
Site restoration activities generated 6029 Stream Mitigation Units (SMUs) and 39.4 riverine Wetland
Mitigation Units (WMUs) within a 71.7-acre conservation easement as the result of the following.
• Restoration of 6,529 linear feet of stream channels that have been straightened and channelized
for agricultural purposes
• Restoration of 32.6 acres of drained hydric soil to riparian riverine wetlands as the result of stream
restoration activities and ditch plugging
• Areas of potential wetland riparian riverine restoration total approximately 7.0 acres of drained
soils with hydric inclusions
• Enhancement of 0.38 acres of jurisdictional riparian headwater forest through stream
realignment activities and supplemental wetland plantings
• Creation of 1.99 acres of riparian riverine wetlands in areas of drained hydric soil requiring bench
excavation
• Preservation of 16.39 acres of jurisdictional riparian riverine wetlands located within forested
headwater systems

Additional activities that occurred at the Site included the following.
• Planting 49.9 acres of the Site with 35,200 stems (planted species and densities by zone are
included in Table 7 [Appendix C])
• Application of permanent seed mix across 49.9 acres of the Site and temporary seed mix
consisting of grain rye, millet, clover, and turnip

The Site's design was completed in October 2018. Construction started on May 13, 2019, and ended with
a final walkthrough on July 31, 2019. The Site was planted on January 16, 2020. Completed project
activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and background information are
summarized in Tables 1-4 (Appendix A).

1.4 Success Criteria
Performance criteria outlined in the NCDMS Mitigation Plan Template (ver. 10/2015) and US Army Corps
of Engineers – Wilmington District Public Notice: Notification of Issuance of Guidance for Compensatory
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Conducted for Wilmington District (October 24, 2016), will be followed
and are briefly outlined below. Monitoring data collected on the Site will include reference photos, plant
survival analyses, channel stability analyses, wetland hydrological analyses, and biological data if
specifically required by permit conditions.

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) page 3
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
Monitoring will be conducted for seven years unless the USACE, in consultation with the Interagency
Review Team (IRT), agrees that monitoring may be terminated early. Early closure will only be provided
through written approval from the USACE in consultation with the IRT. Annual monitoring reports will be
submitted to the NCDMS by RS no later than November 30 of each monitoring year.

Table B: Success Criteria
Streams
• All streams must maintain an Ordinary High-Water Mark (OHWM), per RGL 05-05.
• A continuous surface flow must be documented each year for at least 30 consecutive days.
• Bank height ratio (BHR) cannot exceed 1.2 for a majority of measured cross sections on a given reach.
• Entrenchment ratio (ER) must be 2.2 or above for a majority of measured riffle cross-sections on a given
reach.
• BHR and ER should not change by more than 10% in any given year for a majority of a given reach.
• Must document the occurrence of at least 4 bankfull events in separate years during the monitoring period.
Wetland Hydrology
• Saturation or inundation within the upper 12 inches of the soil surface for, at a minimum, 10 percent of the
growing season during average climatic conditions. Note: Soil temperature for growing season establishment
will be determined using a continuously logging soil probe installed at the rain gauge. Soil temperature will
be measured from mid-February through the end of April (at a minimum).
Vegetation
• Within planted portions of the Site, a minimum of 320 stems per acre must be present at year 3; a minimum
of 260 stems per acre must be present at year 5; and a minimum of 210 stems per acre must be present at
year 7.
• Trees must average 7 feet in height at year 5 and 10 feet in height at year 7.
• Planted and volunteer stems are counted, provided they are included in the approved planting list for the
Site.
• Any single species can only account for 50% of the required stems per monitoring plot.

2.0 METHODS
Monitoring requirements and success criteria outlined in this plan follow the October 24, 2016, NC
Interagency Review Team Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update.
Monitoring will be conducted by Axiom Environmental, Inc. Annual monitoring reports of the data
collected will be submitted to the NCDMS by Restoration Systems no later than December 31 of each
monitoring year data is collected. The monitoring schedule is summarized in Table C.

Table C: Monitoring Schedule
Resource Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
Streams x x x x x
Wetlands x x x x x x x
Vegetation x x x x x
Visual Assessment x x x x x x x
Report Submittal x x x x x x x

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) page 4
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
2.1 Monitoring
Table D summarizes the monitoring parameters.

Table D: Monitoring Summary
Stream Parameters
Parameter Method Schedule/Frequency Number/Extent Data Collected/Reported
Stream
Profile
Full longitudinal
survey
As-built (unless
otherwise required)
All restored stream
channels Graphic and tabular data.
Stream
Dimension Cross-sections Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 Total of 16 cross-sections
on restored channels Graphic and tabular data.
Channel
Stability
Visual Assessments Yearly All restored stream
channels
Areas of concern to be depicted
on a plan view figure with a
written assessment and
photograph of the area included
in the report.
Additional Cross-
sections Yearly
Only if instability is
documented during
monitoring
Graphic and tabular data.
Stream
Hydrology
Continuous
monitoring of
surface water
gauges and/or trail
camera
Continuous recording
through the
monitoring period
Total of 7 surface water
gauges:
One gauge on UT1 – R2,
UT1 – R3, UT1A, UT2, UT3 –
R1, UT3 – R2, and UT4
Surface water data for each
monitoring period as depicted in
Figures 2A-2B.
Bankfull
Events
Continuous
monitoring of
surface water
gauges and/or trail
camera
Continuous recording
through the
monitoring period
Total of 7 surface water
gauges: One gauge on UT1
– R2, UT1 – R3, UT1A, UT2,
UT3 – R1, UT3 – R2, and
UT4
Surface water data for each
monitoring period
Visual/Physical
Evidence
Continuous through
the monitoring period
All restored stream
channels
Visual evidence, photo
documentation, and/or rain data.
Wetland Parameters
Parameter Method Schedule/Frequency Number/Extent Data Collected/Reported
Wetland
Hydrology
Groundwater
gauges
Years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
and 7 throughout the
year, with the growing
season defined as
March 1-November 4
36 gauges spread
throughout restored
wetlands and 1 reference
gauge within the wetland
preservation area
Soil temperature at the beginning
of each monitoring period to
verify the start of the growing
season, groundwater and rain
data for each monitoring period

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) page 5
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
Table D: Monitoring Summary (Continued)
Vegetation Parameters
Parameter Method Schedule/Frequency Number/Extent Data Collected/Reported
Vegetation
establishment
and vigor
Permanent
vegetation plots
0.0247 acre (100
square meters) in
size; CVS-EEP
Protocol for
Recording
Vegetation, Version
4.2 (Lee et al. 2008)
As-built, Years 1, 2, 3,
5, and 7
32 plots spread across the
Site
Species, height, planted vs.
volunteer, stems/acre
Annual random
vegetation plots,
0.0247 acre (100
square meters) in
size
As-built, Years 1, 2, 3,
5, and 7
18 plots randomly selected
each year Species and height

Stream Summary
Stream measurements were not performed in Year 4 (2023), in accordance with the monitoring schedule.
A visual assessment indicates that across the Site, all in-stream structures are intact and functioning as
designed and that channel geometry compares favorably with the proposed conditions outlined in the
Detailed Restoration Plan and as constructed. No stream areas of concern were identified during Year 4
(2023) monitoring. Tables for Year 3 (2022) data and annual quantitative assessments are included in
Appendix D.

Prior to Year 4 (2023) monitoring, all seven (7) stream flow gauges were replaced and reinstalled according
to DMS-provided protocol. The gauges are functioning properly with no issues or data loss. All seven flow
gauges recorded continuous flow for more than the 30-days. Recorded flow periods ranged from 63 to
143 consecutive days (Appendix E).

Two bankfull events were documented in Year 4 (2023) monitoring. Six bankfull events have been
recorded to date, with at least one occurring during all four monitoring years (Table 16, Appendix E).

Wetland Summary
Table E: Summary of Monitoring Period/Hydrology Success Criteria by Year
Year Soil Temperatures/Date Bud
Burst Documented
Monitoring Period Used for
Determining Success
10 Percent of
Monitoring Period
2020 (Year 1) March 2, 2020* March 2-November 4
(248 days) 25 days
2021 (Year 2) March 1, 2021* March 1-November 4
(249 days) 25 days
2022 (Year 3) March 1, 2022* March 1-November 4
(249 days) 25 days
2023 (Year 4) March 1, 2023* March 1-November 4
(249 days) 25 days
*Based on observed/documented bud burst and data collected from a soil temperature data logger located on the Site.
Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) page 6
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
Thirteen of thirty-six groundwater gauges met success criteria for the Year 4 (2023) monitoring period
(Appendix E). The on-site reference gauge met success criteria in Year 4 (2023), with a hydroperiod of 49
days (19.7%). Rainfall data indicate relatively dry conditions leading up to the start of the 2023 growing
season: on-site precipitation was near or below the 30th percentile in January, February, March, and May,
according to WETS data (Appendix E). However, across the Site, the development of herbaceous
hydrophytic species remains abundant.

After evaluating four years of monitoring gauge data along with data from supplemental gauges added
during monitoring RS is preparing a Mitigation Plan Addendum for the wetland assets. RS will submit the
Addendum in January 2024 so that a path forward can be determined.

Vegetation Summary
During quantitative vegetation sampling, 32 sample plots (10-meter by 10-meter) were installed within
the Site as per guidelines established in CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al.
2008). In accordance with the monitoring schedule, vegetation plot monitoring was not performed in Year
4 (2023). Woody vegetation continues to thrive across the Site, with stem heights reaching 10+ feet in
some areas. No areas of vegetation concern were identified in year 4 (2023).

In response to easement encroachment observed during Year 3 (2022) along the northwest parcel
boundary of UT1-Reach 3 (under 500 sq. ft.), WE1's southeastern easement boundary (under 0.10 acres),
and the southeastern easement boundary along UT1-Reach 1 (0.331 acres), RS had easement boundaries
re-surveyed and remarked. The effort included the replacement of several of the easement corner
markers with 6-inch treated fence posts with new conservation easement signage. They also added 6-inch
treated fence posts with new conservation easement signage to several long straight stretches of
easement boundary. Additionally, the encroachment areas were planted with 50, 3-gallon potted trees.
Planted species are listed in Table F below, and the location of planting is shown in Figure 2, Appendix B.
Visual observations during Year 4 (2023) indicate that easement signage is intact, planted stems are
vigorous, and no additional encroachment was observed.

Table F – November 2022 Encroachment Planting
Species Count Mitigation Plan
Approved
Wetland Indicator
Status
Bald Cypress (Taxodium distichum) 10 Yes OBL
Black Cherry (Prunus serotina) 8 Yes FACU
Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana) 8 Yes FAC
Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) 8 Yes FACU
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii) 8 Yes FACW
White Oak (Quercus alba) 8 Yes FACU
Total = 50

In the MY3 (2022) IRT site visit notes a random transect was to be included through the UT2 wetland
enhancement area during MY4 (2023), this will be included in MY5 (2024) when vegetation monitoring
resumes. Also, with regards to the MY3 (2022) IRT site visit notes a round of live stake planting is
scheduled during the winter of 2023/2024 in areas where pines were removed along the stream banks.
Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) page 7
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
3.0 REFERENCES

Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, SD. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation.
Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem
Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.

North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2014. Stream and Wetland Mitigation Monitoring
Guidelines. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Raleigh, North Carolina.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2005. Cape Fear River Basin wide Water Quality Plan.
Available:
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water%20Quality/Planning/BPU/BPU/Cape_Fear/Cape%20Fear%20P
lans/2000%20Plan/CPF_2000.pdf

North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). 2016. Standard Operating Procedures for Collection
and Analysis of Benthic Macroinvertebrates (Version 5.0). (online). Available:
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water%20Quality/Environmental%20Sciences/BAU/NCDWRMacroin
vertebrate-SOP-February%202016_final.pdf

North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). 2009. Cape Fear River Basin Restoration
Priorities 2009 (online). Available:
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Watershed_Planning/Cape_Fear_River_Basin
/RBRP%20CapeFear%202009%20Revised%20032013.pdf

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2016. Web Soil Survey (online). Available:
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx [August 2016].

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1911. Soil Survey of Johnston County, North Carolina.
Soil Conservation Service.

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
APPENDIX A: BACKGROUND TABLES AND MAP

Figure 1. Site Location
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Units
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
KRJ/CLF
AUG 2017
1:20,000
17-002
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
Johnston County, NC
ALLIANCEHEADWATERSMITIGATION SITE
SITE LOCATION
1
³
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic
Society, i-cubed
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic
Society, i-cubed
Directions to the Site from Raleigh:- Take I-40 East out of Raleigh for approximately 27 miles,- Take exit 328B to merge onto I-95 North,- After 6.5 miles, take exit 87 toward Four Oaks,- Turn right onto Keen Road and travel 2.3 miles,- Turn right onto US-701 South and travel 2.5 miles,- Turn left onto Peach Orchard Road and travel 1.7 miles,- Turn right onto Joyner Bridge Road.- After 0.7 miles, the Site is on both sides of Joyner Bridge Road,- Parts of the Site can be accessed via Old Williams Road.- Site Latitude, Longitude: 35.3752, -78.3410 (NAD83/WGS84)
USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (Four Oaks NE andNewton Grove North, NC Quads)
Smithfield
£¤701
§¨¦95
£¤70
Strickland Crossroads
PeachOrchardRoad
H
a
n
n
a
h
Creek
J
o
y
n
e
r
B
r
i
d
g
e
R
o
a
d
StricklandCrossroadsRoad
DevilsRacetrackRoad
O l d W illi a m s R o a d

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Alliance Headwaters Restoration Site
Reach ID Stream Stationing/
Wetland Type
Existing
Footage/
Acreage
Mitigation
Plan Footage/
Acreage
Restoration
Footage/
Acreage
Acreage At-
Risk of
Credit
Removal
Acreage At-
Risk of
Partial
Credit
Reduction
Restoration Level
Restoration
or
Restoration
Equivalent
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation
Credits Comment
UT 1A 10+00 to 10+87 -- 87 87 -- -- Restoration 87 1:1 87
UT 1
Reach 1 10+00 to16+71
4761
671 671 -- -- Restoration 671 1:1 671
UT 1
Reach 2 16+71 to 30+33 1362 1362 -- -- Restoration 1362-70=
1292 1:1 1292
70 feet is outside of the
easement and is therefore
non-credit generating.
UT 1
Reach 3 10+00 to 24+63 1463 1463 -- -- Restoration 1463-149=
1314 1.3:1 1011
149 feet is outside of the
easement and is therefore
non-credit generating.
UT 2 10+00 to 19+97 <1 997 997 -- -- Restoration 997-146=
851 1.3:1 655
146 feet either does not
have proper buffer width
or is outside of the
easement and is therefore
non-credit generating.
UT 3
Reach 1 10+00 to 16+39
3313
639 639 -- -- Restoration 639 1:1 639
UT 3
Reach 2 16+39 to 29+15 1276 1276 -- -- Restoration 1276-132=
1144 1:1 1144
132 feet is outside of the
easement and is therefore
non-credit generating.
UT 4 10+00 to 15+31 1142 531 531 -- -- Restoration 531 1:1 531
Wetland
R1 Riparian Riverine 0 7.11 7.108 -- -- Restoration 7.108 1:1 7.108 Wetland Restoration
Wetland
R2 Riparian Riverine 0 6.97 6.973 0.162 0.379 Restoration 6.973 1.3:1 5.364 Wetland Restoration
Wetland
R3 Riparian Riverine 0 18.47 18.473 -- 0.923 Restoration 18.473 1:1 18.473 Wetland Restoration
Wetland
R4 Riparian Riverine 0 0.29 0.285 -- -- Restoration 0.285 1:1 0.285 Wetland Restoration
Wetland
R5 Riparian Riverine 0 0.95 0.950 -- -- Restoration 0.950 1:1 0.950 Wetland Restoration
Wetland
R6 Riparian Riverine 0 0.90 0.896 -- -- Restoration 0.896 1:1 0.896 Wetland Restoration
Wetland
R7 Riparian Riverine 0 0.28 0.284 -- -- Restoration 0.284 1:1 0.284 Wetland Restoration

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits (continued)
Alliance Headwaters Restoration Site
Reach ID
Stream
Stationing/
Wetland Type
Existing
Footage/
Acreage
Mitigation
Plan
Footage/
Acreage
Restoration
Footage/
Acreage
Acreage
At-Risk of
Credit
Removal
Acreage At-
Risk of
Partial
Credit
Reduction
Restoration Level
Restoration
or
Restoration
Equivalent
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation
Credits Comment
Wetland
R8 Riparian Riverine 0 1.47 1.472 -- -- Restoration 1.472 1.3:1 1.132 Wetland Restoration
Wetland
R9 Riparian Riverine 0 0.87 0.867 0.009 -- Restoration 0.867 1.3:1 0.667 Wetland Restoration
Wetland
R10 Riparian Riverine 0 1.11 1.105 -- 0.070 Restoration 1.105 1:1 1.105 Wetland Restoration
Wetland
R11 Riparian Riverine 0 0.97 0.970 -- -- Restoration 0.970 1:1 0.970 Wetland Restoration
Wetland
R12 Riparian Riverine 0 0.17 0.170 -- 0.082 Restoration 0.170 1:1 0.170 Wetland Restoration
Wetland
E1 Riparian Riverine 0.38 0.38 0.384 -- -- Enhancement 0.384 3.25:1 0.118 Wetland Enhancement
Wetland
C1 Riparian Riverine 0 0.54 0.540 -- -- Creation 0.540 10:1 0.054 Wetland Creation
Wetland
C2 Riparian Riverine 0 0.55 0.546 0.130 -- Creation 0.546 13:1 0.042 Wetland Creation
Wetland
C3 Riparian Riverine 0 0.90 0.901 -- -- Creation 0.901 10:1 0.090 Wetland Creation
Wetland
P1 Riparian Riverine 16.39 16.39 16.392 -- -- Preservation 16.392 10:1 1.639 Wetland Preservation

Length & Area Summations by Mitigation Category Overall Assets Summary
Restoration Level Stream (linear footage) Riparian Wetland (acreage) Asset Category Overall Credits
Restoration 6529* 39.553 Stream 6029.384
Enhancement -- 0.384 Riparian Riverine Wetland 39.354
Creation -- 1.987
Preservation -- 16.392
*An additional 497 linear feet of stream restoration is located outside of the conservation easement
and is therefore not included in this total or in mitigation credit calculations.

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Alliance Headwaters Restoration Site
Activity or Deliverable Data Collection
Complete
Completion
or Delivery
Technical Proposal (RFP No. 16-006477) October 15, 2015 October 28, 2015
Institution Date (NCDMS Contract No. 6832) -- March 21, 2016
404 Permit -- December 3, 2018
Mitigation Plan -- October 12, 2018
Construction Plans -- October 12, 2018
Site Construction -- May 13, 2019-July 31, 2019
Planting -- January 16, 2020
As-built Baseline Stream Data Collection December 11-16, 2019 --
As-built Baseline Vegetation Data Collection January 16-17, 2020 --
As-built Baseline Monitoring (MY0) October 2019 –
January 2020 March 2020
Monitoring Year 1 (2020) Stream Data Collection July 23, 2020 --
Monitoring Year 1 (2020) Vegetation Data Collection July 27-28, 2020 --
Monitoring Year 1 (MY1) January-November
2020 January 2021
Monitoring Year 2 (2021) Stream Data Collection March 10, 2021 --
Monitoring Year 2 (2021) Vegetation Data Collection July 6, 2021 --
Monitoring Year 2 (MY2) January-November,
2021 December 2021
Monitoring Year 3 (2022) Stream Data Collection May 19, 2022 --
Monitoring Year 3 (2022) Vegetation Data Collection June, 2022 --
Monitoring Year 3 (MY3) January-November,
2022 February 2023
Monitoring Year 4 (MY4) January-November,
2023 February 2024

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site
Full Delivery Provider
Restoration Systems
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Worth Creech 919-755-9490
Construction Contractor
Land Mechanic Designs
780 Landmark Road
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Lloyd Glover 919-639-6132
Designer, Construction Plans, and
Sediment/Erosion Control Plans
Ecosystem Planning & Restoration
1150 SE Maynard Road, Suite 140
Cary, NC 27511
Kevin Tweedy, PE
919-999-0262
Planting Contractor
Restoration Systems
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Josh Merritt 919-755-9490
As-built Surveyor
K2 Design Group
5688 US Highway 70 East
Goldsboro, NC 27534
John Rudolph 919-751-0075
Baseline & Monitoring Data Collection
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis 919-215-1693

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site
Project Information
Project Name Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site
Project County Johnston County, North Carolina
Project Area (acres) 71.7
Project Coordinates (latitude & latitude) 35.372028ºN, 78.340514ºW
Planted area (acres) 49.9
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Coastal Plain
Project River Basin Neuse
USGS HUC for Project (14-digit) 03020201150020
NCDWR Sub-basin for Project 03-04-04
Project Drainage Area (acres) 132 to 546
Percentage of Project Drainage Area that is
Impervious <2%
CGIA Land Use Classification Agriculture & Forested/Scrubland
Reach Summary Information
Parameters UT1 UT1A UT2 UT 3 UT4
Length of reach (linear feet) 3495 87 997 1915 531
Valley Classification &
Confinement Alluvial, unconfined
Drainage Area (acres) 546 6.4 147 354 132
NCDWR Stream ID Score Blue Line NA Blue Line 27.25 27.25
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral Perennial Intermittent Perennial Perennial/
Intermittent
Perennial/
Intermittent
NCDWR Water Quality
Classification C, NSW
Proposed Stream Classification
(Rosgen 1996) C5 C5 C5 C5 C5
Underlying Mapped Soils Leaf silt loam
Drainage Class Poorly-drained
Hydric Soil Status Hydric
FEMA Classification NA
Native Vegetation Community Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp
Watershed Land Use/Land Cover
(Site) 31% forest,67% agricultural land, <2% low density residential/impervious surface
Percent Composition of Exotic
Invasive Vegetation <2%

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
APPENDIX B: VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA

Figures 2 & 2A-2B. Current Conditions Plan View
Tables 5A-5H. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
FIGU R E
Dra wn b y:
Da te:
Sca le :
Pro jec t N o.:
KRJ
NO V 2023
1:4500
18-035
Tit le:
Pro jec t:
Pre pa red fo r:
Wayne County, N C
ALLIA NC EHEADWATER SSTREAMAND WETLA NDMITIGATION SITE
CUR RE NTCONDITIONSPLAN VIEW
2
³
0 50 0 1,0 0 0 1,5 0 0250Fe e t
Leg en d
Alliance Headw aters Easem ent
Figur e 2B
Figur e 2A
N ote : B a se ma p i s 2 02 3 d ron e
im ag ery (w he re a va il a bl e ) o n to p o f
20 21 N C On eM ap ortho i ma ge ry
^_
^_
^_
^_
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
1
3
9
8
7
6
4
10
2
5
GW -34 (1 4.5 %)
GW -32 (1 9.7 %)
GW -09 (2 8.5 %)
GW -16 (1 6.5 %)
GW -13 (1 0.8 %)
GW -10 (1 5.0 %)
GW -03 (2 0.0 %)GW -35 (3 .2%)
GW -33 (3 .2%)
GW -18 (3 .8%)
GW -17 (5 .2%)
GW -15 (6 .0%)
GW -12 (4 .0%)
GW -14 (3 .2%)
GW -11 (4.0%)
GW -08 (2 .8%)
GW -07 (1 .6%)
GW -06 (3 .6%)
GW -02 (2 .0%)
GW -01 (2 .8%)
GW -05 (2 .8%)
GW -04 (0 .8%)
5
4
2
3
6
8
7
9
1
11
17 14
15
13
16
12
10
X
S
-0
3
X
S
-
0
2
X
S-0
1
XS-04
XS-06
X S -0 5
X S -0 1
XS-08
X
S
-0
7
XS-0
2
FIGU R E
Dra wn b y:
Da te:
Sca le :
Pro jec t N o.:
KRJ
NO V 2023
1:2500
18-035
Tit le:
Pro jec t:
Pre pa red fo r:
Johnston County, N C
ALLIA NC EHEADWATER SSTREAMAND WETLA NDMITIGATION SITE
CUR RE NTCONDITIONSPLAN VIEW
2A
³
0 50 0 1,0 0 0250Fe e t
UT1 Reach 3
UT1 Reach 1
UT
2
Legend
Allian ce H ead wate rs Ea sem ent = 7 1.7 Acre s
Subj ect P arce l Bou nda ries
Strea m R esto ration = 702 6 ft
Wetlan d Re stor ation = 30.2 4 ac
Wetlan d Re stor ation - Lo wer Ratio = 9.31 ac
Wetlan d En han cem ent = 0 .38 a c
Wetlan d Cr eatio n = 1.4 4 ac
Wetlan d Cr eatio n - L owe r Ra tio = 0.55 a c
Wetlan ds A t-Ris k of Cred it Re mov al
Wetlan ds A t-Ris k of Part ial C redit Red uctio n
Vege tatio n Plo ts M eetin g Su cce ss C riteria in M Y3
Vege tatio n Plo ts N ot M eetin g Su cces s Cr iteria in M Y3
Rand om 50m x 2m Veg etat ion Trans ects Mee ting S ucc ess Crite ria in MY3
Rand om 50m x 2m Veg etat ion Trans ects Not M eet ing S ucc ess C riter ia in MY3
Cros s-Se ction s
!(Grou ndw ater W ells M eet ing S ucc ess C riter ia
!(Grou ndw ater W ells N ot M eeti ng S ucce ss C riter ia
^_Flow Gau ges
MY3 Enc roach men t Co ntain erize d P lantin g Ar eas
UT 1A
WC 1
WR 4
WR 6
WR 5
WR 1
WR 7
WE1
WR 2
WR 8
WR 9
WC 2
UT1 Reach 2
N ote : B a se ma p i s 2 02 3 d ron e
im ag ery (w he re a va il a bl e ) o n to p o f
20 21 N C On eM ap ortho i ma ge ry
^_
^_
^_
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
#*
1
1
1
8
1
7
1
6
1
5
14
12
13
GW -31 (1 0.8 %)
GW -20 (1 5.7 %)
GW -23 (1 0.0 %)
GW -25 (1 9.7 %)
GW -26 (3 3.7 %)
GW -22 (1 9.3 %)
Refe re nce (19.7%)
24
26
29
27
28
32
30
31
20
19
18
25
21
23
22
GW -36 (3 .2%)
GW -30 (1 .2%)
GW -28 (4 .0%)
GW -29 (4 .0%)
GW -19 (2 .0%)
GW -21 (4 .4%)
GW -24 (2 .4%)
GW -27 (4 ..8%)
XS-03
XS-02
XS-01
XS-04
X S-0 2
X
S
-
0
1
FIGU R E
Dra wn b y:
Da te:
Sca le :
Pro jec t N o.:
KRJ
NO V 2023
1:2200
18-035
Tit le:
Pro jec t:
Pre pa red fo r:
Johnston County, N C
ALLIA NC EHEADWATER SSTREAMAND WETLA NDMITIGATION SITE
CUR RE NTCONDITIONSPLAN VIEW
2B
³
0 40 0 80 0200Fe e t
Le g e n d
All ia n ce He a dw a te rs E ase me nt = 71 .7 Acre s
Su bj e ct P ar cel B ou n d ar ie s
Str ea m Re st o ra tio n = 70 2 6 ft
We tl an d R est ora t io n = 3 0 .2 4 a c
We tl an d C re at io n = 1.44 a c
We tl an d P re serva ti o n = 1 6 .3 9 a c
We tl an d s A t-R isk o f Cre d it Re mo val
We tl an d s A t-R isk o f Pa rti a l Cre d it Re d uct io n
Ve g et at io n P lo ts M ee ti n g Su ccess C ri te ria i n MY 3
Ve g et at io n P lo ts N o t Me e ti ng Su cce ss C rit er ia i n MY3
Ra nd o m 5 0 m x 2 m Ve g et a tio n Tra n sects Me et in g Su cce ss Cri te ri a in MY 3
Ra nd o m 5 0 m x 2 m Ve g et a tio n Tra n sects No t Mee ti n g Su ccess Cri te ria in MY 3
Cro ss-Se cti on s
!(Gro un d wa te r We ll s Me e ti ng S u cce ss C rit er ia
!(Gro un d wa te r We ll s N ot Me e tin g S ucce ss Cr ite ri a
^_Fl ow Ga u ge s
#*Ra in Ga u g e an d S o il Te mp e ra tu re L o gg e r
UT 3 Reach 2
UT 3 Reach 1
UT 4
WR 11
WR 1 2
WR 1 0
WR 3
WP1
WC 3
N ote : B a se ma p i s 2 02 3 d ron e
im ag ery (w he re a va il a bl e ) o n to p o f
20 21 N C On eM ap ortho i ma ge ry
Table 5A Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Alliance UT-1 Reach 1
Assessed Length 671
1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 14 14 100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)13 13 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)13 13 100%
4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)13 13 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)13 13 100%
2. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%100%
0 0 100%0 0 100%
3. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.13 13 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 13 13 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.13 13 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 13 13 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.13 13 100%
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
Totals
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Major
Channel
Category
Table 5B Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Alliance UT-1 Reach 2
Assessed Length 1373
1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 27 27 100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)28 28 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)28 28 100%
4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)28 28 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)28 28 100%
2. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%100%
0 0 100%0 0 100%
3. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.25 25 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 25 25 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.25 25 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 25 25 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.25 25 100%
Totals
Major
Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Table 5C Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Alliance UT-1 Reach 3
Assessed Length 1451
1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 20 20 100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)19 19 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)19 19 100%
4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)19 19 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)19 19 100%
2. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%100%
0 0 100%0 0 100%
3. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.18 18 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 18 18 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.18 18 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 18 18 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.18 18 100%
Totals
Major
Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Table 5D Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Alliance UT-1A
Assessed Length 87
1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 3 3 100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)2 2 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)2 2 100%
4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)2 2 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)2 2 100%
2. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%100%
0 0 100%0 0 100%
3. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.2 2 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 2 2 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.2 2 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 2 2 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.2 2 100%
Totals
Major
Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Table 5E Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Alliance UT-2
Assessed Length 997
1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 15 15 100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)14 14 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)14 14 100%
4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)14 14 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)14 14 100%
2. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%100%
0 0 100%0 0 100%
3. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.14 14 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 14 14 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.14 14 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 14 14 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.14 14 100%
Totals
Major
Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Table 5F Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Alliance UT-3 Reach 1
Assessed Length 639
1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 11 11 100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)11 11 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)11 11 100%
4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)11 11 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)11 11 100%
2. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%100%
0 0 100%0 0 100%
3. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.11 11 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 11 11 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.11 11 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 11 11 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.11 11 100%
Totals
Major
Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Table 5G Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Alliance UT-3 Reach 2
Assessed Length 1276
1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 19 19 100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)19 19 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)19 19 100%
4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)19 19 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)19 19 100%
2. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%100%
0 0 100%0 0 100%
3. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.18 18 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 18 18 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.18 18 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 18 18 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.18 18 100%
Totals
Major
Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Table 5H Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Alliance UT-4
Assessed Length 531
1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 9 9 100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition 1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)9 9 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)9 9 100%
4.Thalweg Position 1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)9 9 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)9 9 100%
2. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%100%
0 0 100%0 0 100%
3. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.9 9 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 9 9 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.9 9 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 9 9 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.9 9 100%
Totals
Major
Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Alliance Headwaters
Planted Acreage1 49.9
1. Bare Areas None 0.1 acres none 0 0.00 0.0%
2. Low Stem Density Areas None 0.1 acres none 0 0.00 0.0%
2B. Low Planted Stem Density Areas None 0.1 acres none 0 0.00 0.0%
0 0.00 0.0%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor None 0.25 acres none 0 0.00 0.0%
0 0.00 0.0%
Easement Acreage2 71.7
4. Invasive Areas of Concern4 None 1000 SF none 0 0.00 0.0%
5. Easement Encroachment Areas3 These areas were re-surveyed, signage was replaced, and a containerized planting was executed. No
additional encroachment was observed in MY4 (2023).none yellow
crosshatch 1 0.33 0.5%
% of
Planted
Acreage
Total
Cumulative Total
Vegetation Category Definitions
Number of
Polygons
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Combined
Acreage
CCPV
Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Easement
AcreageVegetation Category Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage,
crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment,
the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are
those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes
that are slightly longer (e.g. 1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can
be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration
of risk factors by DMS such as species present, their coverage, distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will
warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in t he herb layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree/shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of
treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics are of particular
interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons.
The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In
any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the
executive summary.

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
APPENDIX C: STREAM GEOMORPHOLOGY DATA

Tables 7A-7E. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tables 8A-8D. Monitoring Data-Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters-Cross-sections)
Tables 9A-9E. Monitoring Data-Stream Reach Data Summary

Parameter Gauge2
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min Mean Max Min Mean Max Min Med Max Min Med Max Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width (ft)8.4 13.3 24 7.1 7.9 8.6 2
Floodprone Width (ft)100 100 100 100 100 100 2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.43 1.68 2.25 0.5 0.5 0.5 2
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.9 1 1.1 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)12.9 22.2 42 3.6 4 4.4 2
Width/Depth Ratio 14 15.6 17.2 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 1.65 2 11.6 12.9 14.1 2
0.9 1 1.1 2
1Bank Height Ratio 2.7 3.0 3.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)9 28.6 28.45 49.5 10.7 35
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.000 0.010 0.009 0.021 0.007 13
Pool Length (ft)4.3 10.9 9.14 39.8 7.5 27
Pool Max depth (ft)1.7 1.8 2 3
Pool Spacing (ft)25.3 49.8 50.71 89.2 14.7 35
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
7.0 - 30.0
9.7
0.8
0.75 - 1.00
8
12
> 3.0
1.0 - 1.2
7.4
0.82
0.75 - 1.00
6.1
9
> 3.0
0.007
1.4 -2.1
0.0027 - 0.0088
1 1.22 - 1.591.22 - 1.59
0.0027 - 0.0088
1.22 - 1.59
0.0027 - 0.0088
Incised B5c E5/C5C5/E5 C5E5
Monitoring Baseline
6.5
0.6
0.75 - 1.00
3.8
10
> 3.0
1.0 - 1.2
6.5 - 7.5
100
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
1.0 - 1.2
0.50 - 0.70
0.60 - 0.71
3.0 - 4.0
14
6.9 - 10.2
1.0
2.1 - 6.6
1.2 - 2.3
Table 7a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT1/Reach 1&2 (2033 feet)
1.5 - 2.8
1.4 - 2.1
Design
0.0026 - 0.0049
1.26 -1.29
2033
4.2 -8.4
Regional Curve Pre-Existing Condition Cole Property RefJohanna Creek Ref Still Creek Ref
2.9 - 6.4
5.4 - 8.2
C5
1.4 -2.1
2033
1.26 -1.29
0.0049
Parameter Gauge2
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min Mean Max Min Mean Max Min Med Max Min Med Max Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width (ft)5 6 7 10.4 10.4 10.4 1
Floodprone Width (ft)100 100 100 100 100 100 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.8 0.8 0.8 1
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.6 0.7 0.8 1.4 1.4 1.4 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1 1.75 2.5 8.4 8.4 8.4 1
Width/Depth Ratio 6.6 8.6 10.6 13 13 13 1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 1.65 2 9.6 9.6 9.6 1
1.4 1.4 1.4 1
1Bank Height Ratio 2.7 3.0 3.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)12.2 39.6 38.7 63.2 12.7 23
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.001 0.006 0.003 0.029 0.009 10
Pool Length (ft)4.7 13 11.75 32 6.4 22
Pool Max depth (ft)1.9 2.1 2.1 2.3 2
Pool Spacing (ft)37.3 68 73.78 87.5 13.9 22
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
14.0 - 25.0
1.0
9.9
100
0.5 - 0.7
0.93
7.0
14
6.7
1.5 - 2.8 2.9 - 6.4 1.2 - 2.3
1.4 - 2.1 2.1 - 6.6 5.4 - 8.2
1.0 - 1.2 1.0 - 1.2 1.0 - 1.2
1463
1 1.22 - 1.59 1.22 - 1.59 1.22 - 1.59
0.026 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0027 - 0.0088
1.35
0.0018
1.5
10.7
Incised B5c C5/E5 E5 E5/C5 C5
9.7 7.4 6.5
0.8 0.82 0.6
0.75 - 1.00 0.75 - 1.00 0.75 - 1.00
8 6.1 3.8
12 9 10
> 3.0 > 3.0 > 3.0
Regional Curve Pre-Existing Condition Johanna Creek Ref Still Creek Ref
Table 7b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT1/Reach 3 (1463 feet)
Cole Property Ref Design Monitoring Baseline
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
C5
1.5
1463
1.35
0.0028
Parameter Gauge2
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min Mean Max Min Mean Max Min Med Max Min Med Max Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width (ft)5 6 7 9.9 9.9 9.9 1
Floodprone Width (ft)100 100 100 100 100 100 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.6 0.6 0.6 1
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.6 0.7 0.8 1.3 1.3 1.3 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1 1.75 2.5 6.1 6.1 6.1 1
Width/Depth Ratio 6.6 8.6 10.6 16.1 16.1 16.1 1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 1.65 2 10.1 10.1 10.1 1
1.3 1.3 1.3 1
1Bank Height Ratio 2.7 3.0 3.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)15.7 29.9 28.44 52.3 10.8 11
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.000 0.014 0.004 0.014 0.005 8
Pool Length (ft)2.4 14.2 12.38 28.4 7.4 17
Pool Max depth (ft)1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1
Pool Spacing (ft)34.5 55.6 54.92 73.1 10.7 16
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
14.0 - 50.0
C5
2.1
7.5
100
0.6
0.7
4.0
14
5.6
1.4 - 2.1 2.1 - 6.6 5.4 - 8.2
1.5 - 2.8 2.9 - 6.4
12 9 10
> 3.0 > 3.0 > 3.0
0.8 0.82 0.6
0.75 - 1.00 0.75 - 1.00 0.75 - 1.00
8 6.1 3.8
9.7 7.4 6.5
997
1 1.22 - 1.59 1.22 - 1.59 1.22 - 1.59
0.004 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0027 - 0.0088
1.22
0.0049
G5 C5/E5 E5 E5/C5
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
1.0
Design
Table 7c. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT2 (996.7 feet)
Regional Curve Pre-Existing Condition Johanna Creek Ref Still Creek Ref Cole Property Ref
1.0 - 1.2 1.0 - 1.2 1.0 - 1.2
1.2 - 2.3
8.4
C5
2.1
997
1.22
0.0031
Monitoring Baseline
Parameter Gauge2
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min Mean Max Min Mean Max Min Med Max Min Med Max Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width (ft)5 6 7 7.3 8.1 8.9 2
Floodprone Width (ft)100 100 100 100 100 100 2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.6 0.6 0.6 2
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.6 0.7 0.8 1 1 1 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1 1.75 2.5 4.3 4.9 5.4 2
Width/Depth Ratio 6.6 8.6 10.6 12.4 13.5 14.7 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 1.65 2 11.2 12.5 13.7 2
1.0 1.0 1.0 2
1Bank Height Ratio 2.7 3.0 3.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)22.1 39 35.67 60.9 10 29
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.001 0.005 0.005 0.010 0.003 14
Pool Length (ft)7 10.7 10.06 16.8 2.5 28
Pool Max depth (ft)1.6 1.65 1.65 1.7 2
Pool Spacing (ft)45.6 63 60.35 91.7 11.3 28
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
7.5 - 9.2
100
0.6 - 0.7
0.7 - 0.86
4.0 - 6.0
14
4.3 - 5.3
1.0
8.0 - 29.8
0.8 0.82 0.6
0.75 - 1.00 0.75 - 1.00 0.75 - 1.00
8 6.1 3.8
12 9 10
> 3.0 > 3.0 > 3.0
1.0 - 1.2 1.0 - 1.2 1.0 - 1.2
9.7 7.4 6.5
0.003 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0027 - 0.0088
1.21 - 1.38
0.0038 - 0.0040
1915
1 1.22 - 1.59 1.22 - 1.59 1.22 - 1.59
1.9 - 2.6
7.5 - 15.4
Incised B5c C5/E5 E5 E5/C5 C5
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
1.5 - 2.8 2.9 - 6.4 1.2 - 2.3
1.4 - 2.1 2.1 - 6.6 5.4 - 8.2
Regional Curve Pre-Existing Condition Johanna Creek Ref Still Creek Ref Cole Property Ref Design
Table 7d. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT3 (1914.8 feet)
C5
1.9 - 2.6
1915
1.21 - 1.38
0.0033
Monitoring Baseline
Parameter Gauge2
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min Mean Max Min Mean Max Min Med Max Min Med Max Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width (ft)5 6 7 7.5 7.5 7.5 1
Floodprone Width (ft)100 100 100 100 100 100 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.5 0.5 0.5 1
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1 1.75 2.5 3.8 3.8 3.8 1
Width/Depth Ratio 6.6 8.6 10.6 14.8 14.8 14.8 1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 1.65 2 13.3 13.3 13.3 1
0.9 0.9 0.9 1
1Bank Height Ratio 2.7 3.0 3.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)17.4 36.6 31.69 74.4 16.6 9
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.006 0.008 0.008 0.015 0.003 9
Pool Length (ft)5.2 9.5 9.34 12.3 2.3 9
Pool Max depth (ft)1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1
Pool Spacing (ft)21.2 49.6 46.5 75.4 15.6 9
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
10.0 -11.0
0.5
0.61
3.0
14
6.2
1.0
1.5 - 2.8 2.9 - 6.4 1.2 - 2.3
6.5
100
> 3.0
1.0 - 1.2 1.0 - 1.2 1.0 - 1.2
9.7 7.4 6.5
531
1.22 - 1.59 1.22 - 1.59 1.22 - 1.59
0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0027 - 0.0088 0.0027 - 0.0088
1.36
0.0057
2.1
6.2
C5/E5 E5 E5/C5 C5
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
No distinct repetitive pattern of riffles and pools
due to straightening activities.
0.8 0.82 0.6
0.75 - 1.00 0.75 - 1.00 0.75 - 1.00
8 6.1 3.8
12 9 10
> 3.0 > 3.0
1.4 - 2.1 2.1 - 6.6 5.4 - 8.2
Regional Curve Pre-Existing Condition Johanna Creek Ref Still Creek Ref Cole Property Ref
Table 7e. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT4 (530.9 feet)
Design Monitoring Baseline
531
1.36
0.0051
C5
2.1
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation1 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)15.4 16.1 15.1 17.3 16.4 20.3 16.9 18.5 10.4 14.6 11.6 10.8 10.2 11.7 11.2 13.1 8.6 16.7 9.0 9.9
Floodprone Width (ft)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 100 100 100 100 NA NA NA NA 100 100 100 100
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.9 0.9 1.0 0.8 1.1 0.9 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.9 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 12.9 25.4 15.9 13.8 NA NA NA NA 16.8 63.4 18.5 22.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 9.6 6.8 8.6 9.3 NA NA NA NA 11.6 6.0 11.1 10.1
Low Bank Height (ft)1.9 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.5 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.00 1.05 1.04 0.97 1.00 1.04 1.02 1.07 1.00 1.08 0.98 0.96 1.00 1.13 1.04 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.97
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2) 23.4 26.7 23.9 25.1 20.1 24.1 23.2 26.2 11.4 11.3 15.0 14.3 16.9 14.0 13.9 14.2 8.8 12.5 11.2 11.1
d50 (mm)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation1 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)10.4 13.4 11.5 14.0 8.0 8.8 8.0 8.9 7.1 7.0 7.3 9.6
Floodprone Width (ft)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 100 100 100.0 100.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2.0 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 14.0 13.6 14.7 14.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 14.1 14.3 13.8 13.8
Low Bank Height (ft)2.0 1.3 1.0 1.3 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.6 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.08 0.90 0.98 1.0 1.06 1.07 0.97 1.0 1.00 1.12 1.03
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2) 12.8 12.4 10.5 10.4 11.7 11.2 11.5 11 6.1 4.8 7.2 5.7
d50 (mm)
1 = Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: “It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary.”
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation1 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)11.8 25.8 18.2 25.8 9.9 10.9 10.4 8.6
Floodprone Width (ft)NA NA NA NA 100 100 100 100
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.7 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.6 1.1 1.1 0.9 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio NA NA NA NA 16.1 19.5 17.7 17.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio NA NA NA NA 10.1 9.2 9.6 9.6
Low Bank Height (ft)1.6 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.3 1.6 1.3 1.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.00 0.91 0.80 0.93 1.00 1.07 1.01 1.07
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2) 10.9 6.7 12.9 7.3 10.8 10.1 10.7 9.5
d50 (mm)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation1
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Low Bank Height (ft)
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2)
d50 (mm)
1 = Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: “It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary.”
Table 8b. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters – Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT2 (996.7 feet)
Cross Section 1 (Pool)Cross Section 2 (Riffle)
Cross Section 6 (Pool)Cross Section 7 (Pool)Cross Section 8 (Riffle)
Table 8a. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters – Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT1/Reach 1,2,3 (3496 feet)
Cross Section 1 (Pool)Cross Section 2 (Pool)Cross Section 3 (Riffle)Cross Section 4 (Pool)Cross Section 5 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation1 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)11.0 15.8 16.6 13.2 8.9 9.0 10.2 8.5 13.6 14.8 13.5 15.8 7.3 8.0 7.9 8.2
Floodprone Width (ft)NA NA NA NA 100 100 100 100 NA NA NA NA 100 100 100 100
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.9 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.6 1.7 1.6 1.8 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.7 2.0 2.1 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio NA NA NA NA 14.7 15.0 19.2 13.4 NA NA NA NA 12.4 14.9 14.4 15.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio NA NA NA NA 11.2 11.1 9.8 9.8 NA NA NA NA 13.7 12.5 12.7 12.3
Low Bank Height (ft)1.6 1.7 1.6 1.8 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.7 2.0 1.8 1.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.14 1.09 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.02
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2) 14.1 17.1 13.7 15.1 16.8 18.4 17.8 20.5 22.9 16.2 21.8 21.7 7.6 10.9 9.0 10.5
d50 (mm)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation1
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Low Bank Height (ft)
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2)
d50 (mm)
1 = Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: “It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary.”
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation1 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)10.9 11.8 11.9 14.3 7.5 11.7 7.5 10.5
Floodprone Width (ft)NA NA NA NA 100 100 100 100
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio NA NA NA NA 14.8 36.0 14.7 29.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio NA NA NA NA 13.3 8.5 13.4 9.5
Low Bank Height (ft)1.4 1.4 1.3 1.5 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.06 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.96
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2) 13.3 13.1 14.2 12.4 8.0 5.3 5.9 5.5
d50 (mm)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation1
Record elevation (datum) used
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Low Bank Height (ft)
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2)
d50 (mm)
1 = Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: “It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary.”
Table 8d. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters – Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT4 (530.9 feet)
Cross Section 1 (Pool)Cross Section 2 (Riffle)
Table 8c. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters – Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT3 (1914.8 feet)
Cross Section 1 (Pool)Cross Section 2 (Riffle)Cross Section 3 (Pool)Cross Section 4 (Riffle)
Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width (ft)7.1 7.9 8.6 2 7 11.9 16.7 2 7.3 8.15 9 2 9.6 9.75 9.9 2
Floodprone Width (ft)100 100 100 2 100 100 100 2 100 100 100 2 100 100 100 2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.5 0.5 0.5 2 0.5 0.5 0.5 2 0.5 0.5 0.5 2 0.5 0.5 0.5 2
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.9 1 1.1 2 0.8 0.9 1 2 0.8 0.95 1.1 2 0.8 1 1.2 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)3.6 4 4.4 2 3.6 4 4.4 2 3.6 4 4.4 2 3.6 4 4.4 2
Width/Depth Ratio 14 15.6 17.2 2 13.8 23.6 33.4 2 14.7 16.6 18.5 2 22.1 24 25.8 2
Entrenchment Ratio 11.6 12.9 14.1 2 6 10.1 14.3 2 11.1 12.5 13.8 2 10.1 10.3 10.4 2
Low Bank Height (ft)0.9 1.0 1.1 2 0.8 0.9 1.0 2 0.9 1 1.1 2 0.9 1 1.1 2
1Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 2 0.99 1.06 1.12 2 0.97 1.00 1.03 2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)9 28.6 28.5 49.5 10.7 35
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 13
Pool Length (ft)4.3 10.9 9.14 39.8 7.5 27
Pool Max depth (ft)1.7 1.8 2 3
Pool Spacing (ft)25.3 49.8 50.7 89.2 14.7 35
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
3d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 /
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
MY-2 MY- 3 MY- 4 MY- 5
C5
Baseline MY-1
Exhibit Table 9a. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT1/Reach 1&2 (2033 feet)
0
2033
0.0049
1.26 -1.29
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data
indicate significant shifts from baseline
Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width (ft)10.4 10.4 10.4 1 14.6 14.6 14.6 1 11.6 11.6 1 10.8 10.8 1
Floodprone Width (ft)100 100 100 1 100 100 100 1 100 100 1 100 100 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.8 0.8 0.8 1 0.8 0.8 0.8 1 0.7 0.7 1 0.8 0.8 1
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.4 1.4 1.4 1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1 1.3 1.3 1 1.3 1.3 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)8.4 8.4 8.4 1 8.4 8.4 8.4 1 8.4 8.4 1 8.4 8.4 1
Width/Depth Ratio 13 13 13 1 18.3 18.3 18.3 1 15.9 15.9 1 13.7 13.7 1
Entrenchment Ratio 9.6 9.6 9.6 1 6.8 6.8 6.8 1 8.6 8.6 1 9.3 9.3 1
Low Bank Height (ft)1.4 1.4 1.4 1 1.3 1.3 1.3 1 1.3 1.3 1 1.3 1.3 1
1Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1 0.98 0.98 1 0.96 0.96 1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)12.2 39.6 38.7 63.2 12.7 23
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0 0.01 0 0.03 0.01 10
Pool Length (ft)4.7 13 11.8 32 6.4 22
Pool Max depth (ft)1.9 2.1 2.1 2.3 2
Pool Spacing (ft)37.3 68 73.8 87.5 13.9 22
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
3d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 /
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Exhibit Table 9b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT1/Reach 3 (1463 feet)
Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY- 3 MY- 4 MY- 5
0.0028
0
C5
1463
1.35
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data
indicate significant shifts from baseline
Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width (ft)9.9 9.9 9.9 1 10.9 10.9 10.9 1 10.4 10.4 1 8.6 8.6 1
Floodprone Width (ft)100 100 100 1 100 100 100 1 100 100 1 100 100 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.6 0.6 0.6 1 0.6 0.6 0.6 1 0.59 0.59 1 0.71 0.71 1
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.3 1.3 1.3 1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1 1.33 1.33 1 1.45 1.45 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)6.1 6.1 6.1 1 6.1 6.1 6.1 1 6.1 6.1 1 6.1 6.1 1
Width/Depth Ratio 16.1 16.1 16.1 1 19.5 19.5 19.5 1 17.7 17.7 1 12.2 12.2 1
Entrenchment Ratio 10.1 10.1 10.1 1 9.2 9.2 9.2 1 9.6 9.6 1 11.6 11.6 1
Low Bank Height (ft)1.3 1.3 1.3 1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1 1.34 1.34 1 1.55 1.55 1
1Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1 1.01 1.01 1 1.07 1.07 1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)15.7 29.9 28.4 52.3 10.8 11
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 8
Pool Length (ft)2.4 14.2 12.4 28.4 7.4 17
Pool Max depth (ft)1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1
Pool Spacing (ft)34.5 55.6 54.9 73.1 10.7 16
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
3d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 /
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT2 (996.7 feet)
Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY- 3 MY- 4 MY- 5
Exhibit Table 9c. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
C5
996.7
1.22
0.0031
0
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data
indicate significant shifts from baseline
Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width (ft)7.3 8.1 8.9 2 8 8.5 9 2 7.87 9.03 10.2 2 8.2 8.35 8.5 2
Floodprone Width (ft)100 100 100 2 100 100 100 2 100 100 100 2 100 100 100 2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.6 0.6 0.6 2 0.5 0.6 0.6 2 0.53 0.54 0.55 2 0.52 0.58 0.63 2
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1 1 1 2 1 1.1 1.1 2 0.98 1.05 1.11 2 1.13 1.13 1.14 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)4.3 4.9 5.4 2 4.3 4.9 5.4 2 4.3 4.85 5.4 2 4.3 4.85 5.4 2
Width/Depth Ratio 12.4 13.5 14.7 2 14.9 15 15 2 14.4 16.8 19.2 2 13.4 14.5 15.6 2
Entrenchment Ratio 11.2 12.5 13.7 2 11.1 11.8 12.5 2 9.8 11.3 12.7 2 11.8 12 12.3 2
Low Bank Height (ft)1.0 1.0 1.0 2 1.0 1.1 1.1 2 1.02 1.07 1.12 2 1.16 1.2 1.24 2
1Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 2 0.92 1.03 1.14 2 1.02 1.06 1.09 2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)22.1 39 35.7 60.9 10 29
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0 0.01 0 0.01 0 14
Pool Length (ft)7 10.7 10.1 16.8 2.5 28
Pool Max depth (ft)1.6 1.65 1.65 1.7 2
Pool Spacing (ft)45.6 63 60.4 91.7 11.3 28
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
3d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 /
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Exhibit Table 9d. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT3 (1914.8 feet)
Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY- 3 MY- 4 MY- 5
0.0033
C5
1914.8
1.21 - 1.38
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data
indicate significant shifts from baseline
Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n Min Mean Med Max SD4 n
Bankfull Width (ft)7.5 7.5 7.5 1 11.7 11.7 11.7 1 7.5 7.5 1 10.5 10.5 1
Floodprone Width (ft)100 100 100 1 100 100 100 1 100.0 100.0 1 100.0 100.0 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.3 0.3 0.3 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.4 0.4 1
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.9 0.9 0.9 1 0.8 0.8 0.8 1 0.9 0.9 1 0.9 0.9 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)3.8 3.8 3.8 1 3.8 3.8 3.8 1 3.8 3.8 1 3.8 3.8 1
Width/Depth Ratio 14.8 14.8 14.8 1 36 36 36 1 14.7 14.7 1 29.2 29.2 1
Entrenchment Ratio 13.3 13.3 13.3 1 8.5 8.5 8.5 1 13.4 13.4 1 9.5 9.5 1
Low Bank Height (ft)0.9 0.9 0.9 1 0.8 0.8 0.8 1 0.8 0.8 1 0.9 0.9 1
1Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 0.9 0.9 1 1.0 1.0 1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)17.4 36.6 31.7 74.4 16.6 9
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 9
Pool Length (ft)5.2 9.5 9.34 12.3 2.3 9
Pool Max depth (ft)1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1
Pool Spacing (ft)21.2 49.6 46.5 75.4 15.6 9
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
3d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 /
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Project Name/Number (Alliance Headwaters/97086) - Segment/Reach: UT4 (530.9 feet)
Baseline MY-1 MY-2 MY- 3 MY- 4 MY- 5
Exhibit Table 9e. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
C5
530.9
1.36
0.0051
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data
indicate significant shifts from baseline

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
APPENDIX D: HYDROLOGY DATA

Tables 10A-G. Channel Evidence
Stream Gauge Graphs
Table 11. Verification of Bankfull Events
Figure E1. 30/70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall
Soil Temp Graph
Table 12. Groundwater Hydrology Data
Groundwater Gauge Graphs

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
Table 10A. UT1 Downstream Channel Evidence

UT1 Downstream Channel Evidence Year 1
(2020)
Year 2
(2021)
Year 3
(2022)
Year 4
(2023)
Year 5
(2024)
Year 6
(2025)
Year 7
(2026)
Max consecutive days channel flow 201 119 116 143
Presence of litter and debris (wracking) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away Yes Yes Yes Yes
Matted, bent, or absence of vegetation (herbaceous or
otherwise) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sediment deposition and/or scour indicating sediment
transport Yes Yes Yes Yes
Water staining due to continual presence of water Yes Yes Yes Yes
Formation of channel bed and banks Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sediment sorting within the primary path of flow Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sediment shelving or a natural line impressed on the banks Yes Yes Yes Yes
Change in plant community (absence or destruction of
terrestrial vegetation and/or transition to species adapted
for flow or inundation for a long duration, including
hydrophytes)
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Development of channel pattern (meander bends and/or
channel braiding) at natural topographic breaks, woody
debris piles, or plant root systems
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Exposure of woody plant roots within the primary path of
flow No No No No
Other:

Photo 1: UT1 Downstream Channel Evidence

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
Table 10B. UT1 Upstream Channel Evidence
UT1 Upstream Channel Evidence Year 1
(2020)
Year 2
(2021)
Year 3
(2022) Year 4
(2023)
Year 5
(2024)
Year 6
(2025)
Year 7
(2026)
Max consecutive days channel flow 190 160 186 132
Presence of litter and debris (wracking) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away Yes Yes Yes Yes
Matted, bent, or absence of vegetation (herbaceous or
otherwise) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sediment deposition and/or scour indicating sediment
transport Yes Yes Yes Yes
Water staining due to continual presence of water Yes Yes Yes Yes
Formation of channel bed and banks Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sediment sorting within the primary path of flow Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sediment shelving or a natural line impressed on the banks Yes Yes Yes Yes
Change in plant community (absence or destruction of
terrestrial vegetation and/or transition to species adapted
for flow or inundation for a long duration, including
hydrophytes)
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Development of channel pattern (meander bends and/or
channel braiding) at natural topographic breaks, woody
debris piles, or plant root systems
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Exposure of woody plant roots within the primary path of
flow No No No No
Other:

Photo 2: UT1 Upstream Channel Evidence

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
Table 10C. UT1A Channel Evidence
UT1A Channel Evidence Year 1
(2020)
Year 2
(2021)
Year 3
(2022)
Year 4
(2023)
Year 5
(2024)
Year 6
(2025)
Year 7
(2026)
Max consecutive days channel flow 97 73 90 64
Presence of litter and debris (wracking) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away Yes Yes Yes Yes
Matted, bent, or absence of vegetation (herbaceous or
otherwise) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sediment deposition and/or scour indicating sediment
transport Yes Yes Yes Yes
Water staining due to continual presence of water Yes Yes Yes Yes
Formation of channel bed and banks Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sediment sorting within the primary path of flow Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sediment shelving or a natural line impressed on the
banks Yes Yes Yes Yes
Change in plant community (absence or destruction of
terrestrial vegetation and/or transition to species adapted
for flow or inundation for a long duration, including
hydrophytes)
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Development of channel pattern (meander bends and/or
channel braiding) at natural topographic breaks, woody
debris piles, or plant root systems
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Exposure of woody plant roots within the primary path of
flow No No No No
Other:

Photo 3: UT1A Channel Evidence

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024

Table 10D. UT2 Channel Evidence
UT2 Channel Evidence Year 1
(2020)
Year 2
(2021)
Year 3
(2022)
Year 4
(2023)
Year 5
(2024)
Year 6
(2025)
Year 7
(2026)
Max consecutive days channel flow 199 125 110 77
Presence of litter and debris (wracking) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away Yes Yes Yes Yes
Matted, bent, or absence of vegetation (herbaceous or
otherwise) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sediment deposition and/or scour indicating sediment
transport Yes Yes Yes Yes
Water staining due to continual presence of water Yes Yes Yes Yes
Formation of channel bed and banks Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sediment sorting within the primary path of flow Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sediment shelving or a natural line impressed on the
banks Yes Yes Yes Yes
Change in plant community (absence or destruction of
terrestrial vegetation and/or transition to species adapted
for flow or inundation for a long duration, including
hydrophytes)
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Development of channel pattern (meander bends and/or
channel braiding) at natural topographic breaks, woody
debris piles, or plant root systems
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Exposure of woody plant roots within the primary path of
flow No No No No
Other:

Photo 4: UT2 Channel Evidence

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
Table 10E. UT3 Downstream Channel Evidence
UT3 Downstream Channel Evidence Year 1
(2020)
Year 2
(2021)
Year 3
(2022)
Year 4
(2023)
Year 5
(2024)
Year 6
(2025)
Year 7
(2026)
Max consecutive days channel flow 119 234 67 63
Presence of litter and debris (wracking) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away Yes Yes Yes Yes
Matted, bent, or absence of vegetation (herbaceous or
otherwise) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sediment deposition and/or scour indicating sediment
transport Yes Yes Yes Yes
Water staining due to continual presence of water Yes Yes Yes Yes
Formation of channel bed and banks Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sediment sorting within the primary path of flow Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sediment shelving or a natural line impressed on the
banks Yes Yes Yes Yes
Change in plant community (absence or destruction of
terrestrial vegetation and/or transition to species adapted
for flow or inundation for a long duration, including
hydrophytes)
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Development of channel pattern (meander bends and/or
channel braiding) at natural topographic breaks, woody
debris piles, or plant root systems
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Exposure of woody plant roots within the primary path of
flow No No No No
Other:

Photo 5: UT3 Downstream Channel Evidence

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
Table 10F. UT3 Upstream Channel Evidence
UT3 Upstream Channel Evidence Year 1
(2020)
Year 2
(2021)
Year 3
(2022)
Year 4
(2023)
Year 5
(2024)
Year 6
(2025)
Year 7
(2026)
Max consecutive days channel flow 136 127 96 93
Presence of litter and debris (wracking) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away Yes Yes Yes Yes
Matted, bent, or absence of vegetation (herbaceous or
otherwise) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sediment deposition and/or scour indicating sediment
transport Yes Yes Yes Yes
Water staining due to continual presence of water Yes Yes Yes Yes
Formation of channel bed and banks Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sediment sorting within the primary path of flow Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sediment shelving or a natural line impressed on the
banks Yes Yes Yes Yes
Change in plant community (absence or destruction of
terrestrial vegetation and/or transition to species adapted
for flow or inundation for a long duration, including
hydrophytes)
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Development of channel pattern (meander bends and/or
channel braiding) at natural topographic breaks, woody
debris piles, or plant root systems
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Exposure of woody plant roots within the primary path of
flow No No No No
Other:

Photo 6: UT3 Upstream Channel Evidence

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
Table 10G. UT4 Channel Evidence
UT4 Channel Evidence Year 1
(2020)
Year 2
(2021)
Year 3
(2022)
Year 4
(2023)
Year 5
(2024)
Year 6
(2025)
Year 7
(2026)
Max consecutive days channel flow 130 228 88 135
Presence of litter and debris (wracking) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away Yes Yes Yes Yes
Matted, bent, or absence of vegetation (herbaceous or
otherwise) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sediment deposition and/or scour indicating sediment
transport Yes Yes Yes Yes
Water staining due to continual presence of water Yes Yes Yes Yes
Formation of channel bed and banks Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sediment sorting within the primary path of flow Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sediment shelving or a natural line impressed on the
banks Yes Yes Yes Yes
Change in plant community (absence or destruction of
terrestrial vegetation and/or transition to species adapted
for flow or inundation for a long duration, including
hydrophytes)
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Development of channel pattern (meander bends and/or
channel braiding) at natural topographic breaks, woody
debris piles, or plant root systems
Yes Yes Yes Yes
Exposure of woody plant roots within the primary path of
flow No No No No
Other:

Photo 7: UT4 Channel Evidence
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐5
‐3
‐1
1
3
5
7
9
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
31
33
35
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
St
r
e
a
m
 St
a
g
e
 Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Stream Flow Gauge UT1 Downstream 
Year  4 (2023 Data)
143 days
Total Cumulative Flow:
237 days
Bankfull
Event
Bankfull
Event
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐5
‐3
‐1
1
3
5
7
9
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
St
r
e
a
m
 St
a
g
e
 Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Stream Flow Gauge UT1 Upstream 
Year  4 (2023 Data)
132 days
Total Cumulative Flow:
182 days
Bankfull
Event Bankfull
Event
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐5
‐3
‐1
1
3
5
7
9
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
St
r
e
a
m
 St
a
g
e
 Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Stream Flow Gauge UT1A 
Year  4 (2023 Data)
64 days
Total Cumulative Flow:
130 days
Bankfull
Event
Bankfull
Event
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐5
‐3
‐1
1
3
5
7
9
11
13
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
St
r
e
a
m
 St
a
g
e
 Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Stream Flow Gauge UT2
Year  4 (2023 Data)
77 days
Total Cumulative Flow:
173 days
Bankfull
Event
Bankfull
Event
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐5
‐3
‐1
1
3
5
7
9
11
13
15
17
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
St
r
e
a
m
 St
a
g
e
 Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Stream Flow Gauge UT3 Downstream 
Year  4 (2023 Data)
63 days
Total Cumulative Flow:
115 days
Bankfull
Event
Bankfull
Event
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐5
‐3
‐1
1
3
5
7
9
11
13
15
17
19
21
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
St
r
e
a
m
 St
a
g
e
 Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Stream Flow Gauge UT3 Upstream 
Year  4 (2023 Data)
93 days
Total Cumulative Flow:
119 daysBankfull
Event
Bankfull
Event
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐5
‐3
‐1
1
3
5
7
9
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
St
r
e
a
m
 St
a
g
e
 Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Stream Flow Gauge UT4
Year  4 (2023 Data)
135 days
Total Cumulative Flow:
186 days
Bankfull
Event
Bankfull
Event

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
Table 11. Verification of Bankfull Events
Date of Data
Collection Date of Occurrence Method Tributaries Photo
(if available)
April 30, 2020 April 30, 2020
Stream gauges and trail cameras captured a
bankfull event at UT3 after 1.17 inches of
rain was documented between April 30 and
May 1, 2020 at an on-site rain gauge.
UT3 8
November 19, 2020 November 12, 2020
Wrack and laid-back vegetation were
observed outside the TOB of UT1 after 3.61
inches of rain was documented between
November 12 and 13, 2020 at a nearby
weather station.
UT1 9
March 16, 2021 March 16, 2021
The UT1, UT2, UT3, and UT4 stream gauges
and UT1, UT3, and UT4 trail cameras
captured a bankfull event after 2.35 inches
of rain was documented on March 16, 2021
at an on-site rain gauge
UT1, UT2,
UT3, UT4 10-12
February 28, 2022 January 16, 2022
All stream gauges and the UT2 trail camera
captured a bankfull event on all site
streams after 1.37 inches of rain was
documented at an on-site rain gauge.
UT1, UT1A,
UT2, UT3,
UT4
13
April 10, 2023 February 12, 2023
Bankfull event captured by all stream
gauges and the UT2 camera after 0.82 and
0.25 inches of rain were recorded on the
days leading up to this event by an on-site
rain gauge.
UT1, UT1A,
UT2, UT3,
UT4
14
July 25, 2023 April 9, 2023
All stream gauges and the UT3 and UT4
cameras recorded a bankfull event after
2.89 inches of rain fell, as documented by
an on-site rain gauge.
UT1, UT1A,
UT2, UT3,
UT4
15, 16

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024

Photo 8: UT3 at bankfull stage.
Photo 9: Wrack and laid-back vegetation
outside the TOB of UT1 after a bankfull event.

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024

Photo 10: UT1 at bankfull stage.
Photo 11: UT3 at bankfull stage.

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024

Photo 12: UT4 at bankfull stage.
Photo 13: UT2 receding from an overnight bankfull event.

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024

Photo 14: UT2 during a bankfull event.
Photo 15: UT3 during a bankfull event.

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024

Photo 16: UT4 during a bankfull event.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

A
m
o
u
n
t

i
n

I
n
c
h
e
s
Figure E1: Alliance Headwaters
30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall
Current year data from onsite rain gauge
30-70th percentile data from WETS Station: Smithfield, NC
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
30th Percentile
70th Percentile
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
50
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
90
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
5
/
2
3
1/
2
9
/
2
3
2/
1
2
/
2
3
2/
2
6
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
6
/
2
3
4/
9
/
2
3
4/
2
3
/
2
3
5/
7
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
6/
4
/
2
3
6/
1
8
/
2
3
7/
2
/
2
3
7/
1
6
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
1
3
/
2
3
8/
2
7
/
2
3
9/
1
0
/
2
3
9/
2
4
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
2
/
2
3
11
/
5
/
2
3
11
/
1
9
/
2
3
So
i
l
 Te
m
p
 °F
Date
Alliance Headwaters Soil Temperature
Year  4  (2023 Data)
March 15:
53.00 °F
March 1:
59.25°F

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
Table 12. Groundwater Hydrology Data

Gauge
Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season (Percentage)
Year 1
(2020)
Year 2
(2021)
Year 3
(2022)
Year 4
(2023)
Year 5
(2024)
Year 6
(2025)
Year 7
(2026)
1 No
9 days (3.6%)
Yes
37 days (14.9%)
No
12 days (4.8%)
No
7 days (2.8%)
2 No
9 days (3.6%)
No
21 days (8.4%)
No
11 days (4.4%)
No
5 days (2.0%)
3 Yes
55 days (22.2%)
Yes
86 days (34.5%)
Yes
28 days (11.2%)
Yes
49 days (20.0%)
4 No
10 days (4.0%)
Yes
36 days (14.5%)
No
3 days (1.2%)
No
2 days (0.8%)
5 Yes
29 days (11.7%)
No
19 days (7.6%)
No
11 days (4.4%)
No
7 days (2.8%)
6 No
16 days (6.5%)
No
20 days (8.0%)
No
14 days (5.6%)
No
9 days (3.6%)
7 No
7 days (2.8%)
No
8 days (3.2%)
No
4 days (1.6%)
No
4 days (1.6%)
8 Yes
50 days (20.2%)
Yes
51 days (20.5%)
No
13 days (5.2%)
No
7 days (2.8%)
9 Yes
75 days (32.7%)
Yes
93 days (37.3%)
Yes
45 days (18.1%)
Yes
71 days (28.5%)
10 Yes
72 days (29.0%)
Yes
58 days (23.3%)
Yes
28 days (11.2%)
Yes
38 days (15.0%)
11 Yes
64 days (25.8%)
Yes
42 days (16.9%)
No
13 days (5.2%)
No
10 days (4.0%)
12 No
18 days (7.3%)
Yes
36 days (14.5%)
No
22 days (8.8%)
No
10 days (4.0%)
13 No
20 days (8.1%)
Yes
58 days (23.3%)
No
21 days (8.4%)
Yes
27 days (10.8%)
14 No
16 days (6.5%)
Yes
44 days (17.7%)
No
12 days (4.8%)
No
8 days (3.2%)
15 No
13 days (5.2%)
No
18 days (7.2%)
No
21 days (8.4%)
No
15 days (6.0%)
16 Yes
34 days (13.7%)
Yes
70 days (28.1%)
Yes
27 days (10.8%)
Yes
41 days (16.5%)
17 No
19 days (7.7%)
Yes
36 days (14.5%)
No
13 days (5.2%)
No
13 days (5.2%)
18 No
10 days (4.0%)
No
19 days (7.6%)
No
11 days (4.4%)
No
9 days (3.8%)
19 No
8 days (3.2%)
No
10 days (4.0%)
No
4 days (1.6%)
No
5 days (2.0%)

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
Table 12. Groundwater Hydrology Data (continued)
* Prior to the MY2 (2021) growing season, six additional wetland gauges were installed in areas of the Site RS felt needed additional data
points (near GW19, near vegetation plot 31, near GW 7, at the upstream portion of UT 2, and across UT 1 from GW 11-12). Additionally,
a reference groundwater gauge was installed in the wetland preservation area at the headwaters of UT 3 and 4.
**Prior to the MY4 (2023) growing season an additional wetland gauge was installed between gauges GW 24 and GW 30 to provide
additional data for this area.
Gauge
Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season (Percentage)
Year 1
(2020)
Year 2
(2021)
Year 3
(2022)
Year 4
(2023)
Year 5
(2024)
Year 6
(2025)
Year 7
(2026)
20 Yes
36 days (14.5%)
Yes
58 days (23.3%)
Yes
25 days (10.0%)
Yes
39 days (15.7%)
21 Yes
34 days (13.7%)
Yes
36 days (14.5%)
No
22 days (8.8%)
No
11 days (4.4%)
22 Yes
69 days (27.8%)
Yes
56 days (22.5%)
Yes
28 days (11.2%)
Yes
48 days (19.3%)
23 Yes
35 days (14.1%)
Yes
42 days (16.9%)
Yes
25 days (10.0%)
Yes
25 days (10.0%)
24 No
5 days (2.0%)
No
14 days (5.6%)
No
1 day (0.4%)
No
6 days (2.4%)
25 Yes
46 days (18.5%)
Yes
55 days (21.1%)
Yes
27 days (10.8%)
Yes
49 days (19.7%)
26 Yes
167 days (67.3%)
Yes
88 days (35.3%)
Yes
61 days (24.5%)
Yes
84 days (33.7%)
27 Yes
74 days (29.8%)
Yes
57 days (22.9%)
No
13 days (5.2%)
No
12 days (4.8%)
28 Yes
45 days (18.1%)
Yes
49 days (19.7%)
No
4 days (1.6%)
No
10 days (4.0%)
29 Yes
45 days (18.1%)
Yes
81 days (32.5%)
Yes
12 days (4.8%)
No
10 days (4.0%)
30* NA Yes
38 days (15.3%)
No
0 days (0.0%)
No
3 days (1.2%)
31* NA Yes
98 days (39.4%)
Yes
44 days (17.7%)
Yes
27 days (10.8%)
32* NA Yes
58 days (23.3%)
Yes
45 days (18.1%)
Yes
49 days (19.7%)
33* NA Yes
42 days (16.9%)
No
13 days (5.2%)
No
8 days (3.2%)
34* NA Yes
55 days (22.1%)
No
22 days (8.8%)
Yes
36 days (14.5%)
35* NA Yes
42 days (16.9%)
No
13 days (5.2%)
No
8 days (3.2%)
36** NA NA NA No
8 days (3.2%)
Ref* NA Yes
51 days (20.5%)
No
15 days (6.0%)
Yes
49 days (19.7%)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 1
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
7 Days ‐2.8%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 2
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
5 Days ‐2.0%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 3
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season 
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
49 Days ‐20.0%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 4
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
2 Days ‐0.8%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 5
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season 
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
7 Days ‐2.8%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 6
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
9 Days ‐3.6%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 7
Year  4 (2023 Data)
Start Growing Season
March 1
4 Days ‐1.6%
End Growing Season
November 4
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s

(i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 8
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season 
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
7 Days ‐2.8%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s

(i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 9
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
71 Days ‐28.5%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 10
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
38 Days ‐15.0%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s

(i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 11
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
10 Days ‐4.0%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 12
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
10 Days ‐4.0%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 13
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
27 Days ‐10.8%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s

(i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 14
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
8 Days ‐3.2%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s

(i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 15
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
15 Days ‐6.0%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 16
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
41 Days ‐16.5%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s

(i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 17
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1 13 Days ‐5.2%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 18
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
9 Days ‐3.8%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s

(i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 19
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
5 Days ‐2.0%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 20
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
39 Days ‐15.7%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s

(i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 21
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
11 Days ‐4.4%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 22
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
48 Days ‐19.3%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s

(i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 23
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
25 Days ‐10.0%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 24
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
6 Days ‐2.4%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 25
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
49 Days ‐19.7%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s

(i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 26
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
84 Days ‐33.7%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s

(i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 27
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
12 Days ‐4.8%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s

(i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 28
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
10 Days ‐4.0%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s

(i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 29
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
10 Days ‐4.0%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s

(i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 30
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
3 Days ‐1.2%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s

(i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 31
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
27 Days ‐10.8%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s

(i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 32
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1 49 Days ‐19.7%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s

(i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 33
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
8 Days ‐3.2%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s

(i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 34
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
36 Days ‐14.5%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
 Am
o
u
n
t
s

(i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 35
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
8 Days ‐3.2%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

A
m
o
u
n
t
s

(
i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Gauge 36
Year 4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
8 Days - 3.2%
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
‐40
‐38
‐36
‐34
‐32
‐30
‐28
‐26
‐24
‐22
‐20
‐18
‐16
‐14
‐12
‐10
‐8
‐6
‐4
‐2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1/
1
/
2
3
1/
1
1
/
2
3
1/
2
1
/
2
3
1/
3
1
/
2
3
2/
1
0
/
2
3
2/
2
0
/
2
3
3/
2
/
2
3
3/
1
2
/
2
3
3/
2
2
/
2
3
4/
1
/
2
3
4/
1
1
/
2
3
4/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
1
/
2
3
5/
1
1
/
2
3
5/
2
1
/
2
3
5/
3
1
/
2
3
6/
1
0
/
2
3
6/
2
0
/
2
3
6/
3
0
/
2
3
7/
1
0
/
2
3
7/
2
0
/
2
3
7/
3
0
/
2
3
8/
9
/
2
3
8/
1
9
/
2
3
8/
2
9
/
2
3
9/
8
/
2
3
9/
1
8
/
2
3
9/
2
8
/
2
3
10
/
8
/
2
3
10
/
1
8
/
2
3
10
/
2
8
/
2
3
11
/
7
/
2
3
11
/
1
7
/
2
3
11
/
2
7
/
2
3
12
/
7
/
2
3
12
/
1
7
/
2
3
12
/
2
7
/
2
3
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

Am
o
u
n
t
s
 (i
n
)
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

Le
v
e
l
 (i
n
)
Alliance Headwaters Groundwater Reference Gauge
Year  4 (2023 Data)
End Growing Season
November 4
Start Growing Season
March 1
49 Days ‐19.7%

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
APPENDIX E. SITE PHOTO LOG
Alliance Headwaters
MY-04 (2023) Photo Log
Photo 1: Aerial view of vegetation along UT 1 and UT 2
MY4 (2023) Monitoring Report (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Photo 2: Aerial view of UT 3 and 4
Alliance Headwaters
MY-04 (2023) Photo Log
Photo 3: Aerial view of UT 1 upstream
Photo 4: Aerial view of UT1 downstream and UT2
MY4 (2023) Monitoring Report (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alliance Headwaters
MY-04 (2023) Photo Log
Photo 5: Signage and posts at edge of easement
Photo 6: Aerial view of easement boundary and signage
MY4 (2023) Monitoring Report (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alliance Headwaters
MY-04 (2023) Photo Log
Photo 7: Crossing at edge of easement on UT-1, downstream
Photo 8: Crossing at edge of easement on UT-1, upstream
MY4 (2023) Monitoring Report (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alliance Headwaters
MY-04 (2023) Photo Log
Photo 9: UT-2 forded crossing, downstream
Photo 10: UT-2 forded crossing, upstream
MY4 (2023) Monitoring Report (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alliance Headwaters
MY-04 (2023) Photo Log
Photo 11: Culvert at edge of easement, UT-3, downstream
Photo 12: Culvert at edge of easement, UT-3, upstream
MY4 (2023) Monitoring Report (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alliance Headwaters
MY-04 (2023) Photo Log
Photo 13: Bud Burst of Betula nigra
Photo Taken 2/28/23
Photo 14: Bud Burst of Cornus amomum
Photo Taken 2/28/23
MY4 (2023) Monitoring Report (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Alliance Headwaters
MY-04 (2023) Photo Log
Photo 15: Pine Thinning
Photo Taken 5/12/23
Photo 16: Pine Thinning
Photo Taken 5/12/23
MY4 (2023) Monitoring Report (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC

Monitoring Report MY4 (Project No. 97086) Appendices
Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site Restoration Systems, LLC
Johnston County, North Carolina February 2024
APPENDIX F. IRT CORRESPONDENCE

2022-10-20. MY2 (2021) and MY3 (2022) IRT Site Visit Notes

Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina
Ph: [phone]
Fx: [phone]
1101 Haynes St., Suite 211 • Raleigh, NC 27604 • www.restorationsystems.com • Ph 919.755.9490 • Fx 919.755.9492
October 21, 2022
Lindsay Crocker
NC DEQ – Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
Subject: MY2 (2021) and MY 3 (2022) IRT Site Visit
Alliance Headwaters Stream & Riparian Riverine Wetland Mitigation Site
DMS Contract #: 6832; DMS Project ID: 95017; RFP # 16-006477
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2016-00882; DWR ID No. 20160405
MY2 (2021) and MY 3 (2022) IRT Site Visit: Site Visit Notes
On October 20, 2022, Restoration Systems (RS) held an on-site meeting with regulatory agencies to discuss the MY2
(2021) monitoring data and the MY 3 (2022) interim data for the Alliance Headwaters Mitigation Site. Below is a list
of attendees and general site visit notes.
Attendees:
USACE:
-Todd Tugwell
-Casey Haywood
NC DWR:
-Erin Davis
Restoration Systems:
-Raymond Holz
-Alex Baldwin
Division of Mitigation Services:
-Lindsay Crocker
Site Visit Notes:
-RS will include a random vegetation transect through the UT 2 Wetland Enhancement Area during MY4
(2023).
-RS will ensure proper easement signage/marking along all Site’s agriculture boundaries. This effort will
include the southern easement boundary of the eastern tract along the gravel ag. road. This effort will
consist of treated 6-inch fence posts at all easement corners and adequate marking every 200 feet with
easement signage.
-RS will implement an initial treatment to pines throughout the easement in Q1 2023 – paying particular
attention to pines on and along stream banks. RS will also plant live stakes in areas where pines are removed
from the stream banks.
-Between groundwater gauges 24 and 30, RS will install a shorter/shallower groundwater gauge to see if the
deeper gauges (24 and 30) have punctured through the restrictive soil layer.
-If 2022 photos are available that show the streams/site in a wetter condition, RS will provide them in the
MY 3 (2022) monitoring Report.
-In the MY 3 (2022) monitoring report, RS will provide pictures of the improved road outlets. This includes
the additional outlet constructed near groundwater gauge 19 – installed in August of 2022. The purpose of
these outlets is to allow surface hydrology to enter the Site from adjacent agricultural fields.
-RS will perform groundwater gauge maintenance across the Site, ensuring bentonite caps are in place and
level with the surrounding ground elevation.
-RS will review alternative approaches to monitoring stream flow and switch stream-flow gauges if
appropriate.
1
Ray Holz
From:Haywood, Casey M CIV USARMY CEMVP (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent:Monday, October 31, 2022 1:03 PM
To:Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA); Davis, Erin B; Ray Holz
Cc:Crocker, Lindsay; Alex Baldwin
Subject:RE: [Non‐DoD Source] RE: [External] Alliance Headwaters / MY2 (2021) and MY 3 (2022) IRT Site Visit / . SAW‐2016‐00882; DWR ID No. 
20160405
Thanks Todd. 

And thanks Ray, these look good to me also. Please reach out if you have any questions regarding the diagram for the 
flow gauge install.  

Thanks,  
Casey 

Casey Haywood 
Mitigation Specialist, Regulatory Division   I   U.S. Army Corps of Engineers  
Work cell: (919) 750‐7397 

From: Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>  
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:39 PM 
To: Davis, Erin B <[e-mail]>; Ray Holz <[e-mail]>; Haywood, Casey M CIV USARMY 
CEMVP (USA) <[e-mail]> 
Cc: Crocker, Lindsay <[e-mail]>; Alex Baldwin <[e-mail]> 
Subject: RE: [Non‐DoD Source] RE: [External] Alliance Headwaters / MY2 (2021) and MY 3 (2022) IRT Site Visit / . SAW‐
2016‐00882; DWR ID No. 20160405 

Ray, these look fine to me too. 

Casey, I’m not sure if you received these due to your email snafu, so just sharing. 

Thanks, 
Todd 

From: Davis, Erin B <[e-mail]>  
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:15 PM 
To: Ray Holz <[e-mail]>; Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) 
<[e-mail]>; Haywood, Casey M CIV USARMY CEMVP (USA) 
<[e-mail]> 
Cc: Crocker, Lindsay <[e-mail]>; Alex Baldwin <[e-mail]> 
Subject: [Non‐DoD Source] RE: [External] Alliance Headwaters / MY2 (2021) and MY 3 (2022) IRT Site Visit / . SAW‐2016‐
00882; DWR ID No. 20160405 

Thanks for sending. I have no additional comments. 

Much appreciated, 

Erin B. Davis, PWS (she/her/hers)
Stream & Wetland Mitigation Coordinator
Division of Water Resources
NC Department of Environmental Quality
2
919-817-0360 cell
[e-mail]

From: Ray Holz <[e-mail]>  
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2022 12:59 PM 
To: Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>; Haywood, Casey M CIV USARMY 
CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Davis, Erin B <[e-mail]> 
Cc: Crocker, Lindsay <[e-mail]>; Alex Baldwin <[e-mail]> 
Subject: [External] Alliance Headwaters / MY2 (2021) and MY 3 (2022) IRT Site Visit / . SAW‐2016‐00882; DWR ID No. 
20160405 

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to 
Report Spam. 

Todd, Casey, and Erin – 

Thank you for the time yesterday at Alliance. I feel that it was very productive on many fronts. I have attached a set of 
site visit notes for your review. Please send along any additional notes you would like added, and I will include all notes 
in the MY3 (2022) monitoring report. 

Best, 
RH 

----- ------ ------
Raymond J. Holz   |   Restoration Systems, LLC 
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211   |   Raleigh, NC 27604 
tel: [phone]   |   cell: 919.604.9314   |   fax: [phone] 
email:  [e-mail]