WQ0000672_Permit Application_19990615

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GROUNDWATER SECTION
Jake 15, (��y
TO: AV-'- bath
FA Regional Regional Office
FROM: fO &4-e r i L ewJ f
SUBJECT: Application for_ Permit Renewal,
New Permit
COMAfENTS:
KPermit Amendment
Facility Name: of t y 0 L4 m [p 2v �O N
County: R Q b e,5a�
Type of Project• L—a %G(
APPLICABLE PER.'9IIT NO.s: WQ 0000972
DEH
EPA (CONST. GRANTS)
RECEIVED.
1
FAYETf1:1tiLQ E
RIG. OFFICE-
Repair/Alteration of Exist. Disposal System [DEHJ
g 9/d /
ANIMAL WASTE (DWQ)
AtoC
The Groundwater Section has received ONi.Y ONE (1) copy of the referenced permit application. A copy of the
application should have been sent to your Regional Water Quality Supervisor, so please use that copy for
your review - IF A COPY HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED N THE REGIONAL OFFICE, PLEASE LET ME
KNOW.
The Groundwater Section has received QM,Y ONE. (l) copy of the referenced permit application. A copy of the
application should have been sent to DEH's Regional Soil Specialist, so please use
that copy for your review - IF A COPY HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED N THE REGIONAL OFFICE, PLEASE
LET ME KNOW. _
�( The Groundwater Section received two (2) copies of the referenced permit application. One copy of the
application documents we received is attached.
Please review the application materials for completeness. If you feel additional information is necessary, please
let me know no later than jif n z 2 % I ff? . A copy of any formal request for additional information
will be forwarded to you.
If you do not need any additional information to complete your review, please provide your final comments
by If you request and/or receive additional information, ynur final comments
V-98TRAN.SHL (rev. 9/29/98)

II.
REGE�ysp 01
1-9 tu
j
WAiFR c1UPr. ^
2 a tig9�
rr 6-
FAQ' z
Per��9 �
- LU
�1on-�ischacge
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT MODIFICATION
LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
CITY OF LUMBERTON
LUMBERTON, NORTH CAROLINA
NON -DISCHARGE PERMIT NO. W00000672
Prepared For:
City of Lumberton
Post Office Box 1388
Lumberton, North Carolina 28358
Compiled By:
S&ME, Inc.
3718 Old Battleground Road
Greensboro, North Carolina 27410
May 1999

LEM
May 21, 1999
N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
512 North Salisbury Street (27604)
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Attention: Mr. Kim Colson
Reference: MODIFICATION OF PERMIT NO. WQ0000672
City of Lumberton Land Application of Residual Solids Program
S&ME Project No. 1588-93-004
Dear Mr. Colson:
S&ME, Inc. is under contract with the City of Lumberton to manage their land application of
residual solids program. We are requesting to modify the existing non -discharge permit by 1)
adding new acreage, 2) deleting some of the currently pemutted acreage, and 3) amending
permitted volumes for each of the two sources. S&ME wishes to modify the existing non -
discharge permit by adding approximately 457.2 acres (403.3 net acres) as receiver sites for the
land application of residual solids. These sites are listed as Table 2 of Section V. We also wish to
remove all of the 32.5 net acres of the W. Henry Home Site 20 (Robeson County) from the permit.
This acreage has changed ownership. We also wish to remove Field LH-3 (6.5 net acres) of the
Larry Hinson Farm (Columbus County) from the permit. This acreage is developed as a residential
site. A table (Tablel) containing previously permitted sites, that are requested to remain in the
permit, is also presented in Section V. S&ME also requests that the permitted volumes for land
application from the Lumberton WWTP and the Lumberton WTP be increased to 1,500 dry tons
and 400 dry tons, respectively, for a combined total permitted volume of 1,900 dry tons annually.
Calculations and support data for this volume is contained in Sections II, III and IV.
S&ME, Inc. [phone]
!I 3718 Old Battleground Road [phone] fax
Greensboro, North Carolina 27410 [phone] w .smeinc.com

i Modification of Permit WQ0000672 S&ME Project No. 1588-93-004
City of Lumberton Land Application Program May 21, 1999
S&ME is also requesting that changes be made to the existing permit, dated April 4, 1997. These
changes are as follows:
1) In the current permit text, Section III. MONITORING AND REPORTING
REOUIREMENTS — Item 5 requires that "A Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Procedure
(TCLP) analysis shall be conducted by the Pernrittee annually." The City of Lumberton
would like to request discontinuing this requirement. The residuals at the Lumberton
sources during the last several years of TCLP monitoring have not indicated any parameters
of concern.
2) Also, under Section VI. GENERAL CONDITIONS Item 4, footnote a states, "This land
J
application site is partially covered in soils having a seasonal high water table at depths
ranging from 2.0 to 3.0 feet below land surface. Therefore, no residuals shall be land
applied to this field during the period from December through March, Inclusive." The city
of Lumberton requests that this footnote be reviewed and changed to the following
restriction, which has been issued in many recent non -discharge permits for land
application. The request is to replace the footnote a with the following statement: "Soil
borings shall be conducted on this field to verify that the apparent water table, at the time of
application, is greater than three feet below land surface prior to the land application of
residuals." With the restriction written this way, it will allow row crop fields that are being
used for winter small grains to receive residuals during the planting and early crop
establishment months when water table conditions allow. It will also allow row crop fields
that are being used for corn production, and planted in mid- to late March, to receive
residuals prior to planting, when water table conditions allow. In no case will residuals be
applied when conditions do not allow. With this restriction, contravention of groundwater
standards can be avoided and monitored more closely than the previous restrictions, along
with allowing some flexibility in application periods when conditions allow.

Modification of Permit WQ0000672 S&ME Project No. 1588-93-004
City of Lumberton Land Application Program May 21, 1999
The Angus McCormick Farm, Site 25 (Section VIH) in this permit modification has formerly been
included in the Brian's Waste Recycling Permit No. WQ0002217, which is expiring in October of
1999. Land application has been discontinued on this site. David Wallwork (President of Brian's
Waste Recycling) has verified that he will not seek to renew this permit. Cumulative loadings for
the Angus McCormick Farm will be transferred from previous records to the initial records for that
site in the City of Lumberton Program. As a result, accurate monitoring of cumulative loadings for
the site will be maintained.
Operating procedures will involve the land application of the City of Lumberton Wastewater
Treatment Plant (WWTP) residual solids onto the proposed fields. During the majority of each
year the W WTP receives residual solids from the City of Lumberton Water Treatment Plant (WTP)
and mixes these residuals with the WWTP residuals. However, the City of Lumberton would like
to continue to keep the WTP residuals permitted as a separate source to allow the flexibility to land
apply the WTP residuals directly from the WTP if they desire. All land application activities will
be done within agronomic rates in accordance with Permit No. WQ0000672 and monitored closely
I
— by S&ME and the City of Lumberton.
-- Your prompt attention in the review of this permit modification application would be greatly
appreciated. Please contact us immediately if you require additional information or have questions
in the review of the permit modification.
Sincerely,
S&ME, INC}.�
- Robert . Willcox, Jr., L.S.S.
Residuals Management Department Manager
,Aesl &�f -
Scott D. Berg
Land Application/Residuals Operator
#22731
RPW/SDB/sbg
Enclosure: Permit Modification Package, $325.00 submittal fee
' cc: Mr. Howard Revels, City of Lumberton
Project File

i
,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section No. Title Page No.
I MANAGEMENT PLAN 1
SPILL CONTROL PLAN 4
APPLICATION RATES 5
MONITORING 8
( RECORDS 9
H LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
APPLICATION FORM
CITY OF LUMBERTON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
III CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
-- CITY OF LUMBERTON WATER TREATMENT PLANT
IV CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
COMBINATION OF LUMBERTON WASTEWATER TREATMENT
AND LUMBERTON WATER TREATMENT PLANT
V LISTING OF SITES PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED AND
LISTING OF SITES PROPOSED FOR INCLUSION
PROPOSED MODIFICATION SITES
VI HINTON MCCALL HING FARM — SITE 23
Agronomist/Soil Scientist Report
Field Investigations
Owner/Operator Agreement Form
Location Map
Topographic Map
FSA Map
NRCS Map
Buffer Map
Field Data Sheet
Surface Water Classifications
Soil Analysis Report
�I

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)
Section No. Title
VII DAN ODOM FARM — SITE 24
Agronomist/Soil Scientist Report
Field Investigations
Owner/Operator Agreement Form
Location Map
Topographic Map
FSA Map
NRCS Map
Buffer Map
_ Field Data Sheet
Surface Water Classifications
Soil Analysis Report
VIII ANGUS MCCORMICK FARM — SITE 25
Agronomist/Soil Scientist Report
Field Investigations
Owner/Operator Agreement Form
Location Map
Topographic Map
FSA Map
NRCS Map
Buffer Map
Field Data Sheet
Surface Water Classifications
Soil Analysis Report
ix JOHN MOODY SMITH FARM — SITE 26
Agronomist/Soil Scientist Report
Field Investigations
Owner/Operator Agreement Form
Location Map
Topographic Map
FSA Map
NRCS Map
Buffer Map
Field Data Sheet
Surface Water Classifications
Soil Analysis Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)
Section No. Title
X GERALD LEE FARM (Field JL-2)
Agronomist/Soil Scientist Report
Field Investigations
Owner/Operator Agreement Form
Location Map
Topographic Map
FSA Map
NRCS Map
Buffer Map
Field Data Sheet
Surface Water Classifications
Soil Analysis Report
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: RESIDUAL SOLIDS ANALYSIS REPORTS
City of Lumberton Wastewater Treatment Plant
• Nutrient and Metal Analysis
• TCLP Analysis
• Pathogen and Vector Attraction
City of Lumberton Water Treatment Plant
• Nutrient and Metal Analysis
• TCLP Analysis
APPENDIX B: SOIL SERIES DESCRIPTIONS AND
INTERPRETATIONS RECORDS

SECTION I
MANAGEMENT PLAN
SPILL CONTROL PLAN
APPLICATION RATES
MONITORING
RECORDS

MANAGEMENT PLAN
The residual solids management program proposes that residual solids from the Lumberton
Wastewater Treatment Plant (W WTP) and the City of Lumberton Water Treatment Plant (WTP) be
land applied to the proposed fields as an agricultural resource at agronomic rates. The residual
solids will be applied to row crops and hay or pasture land at agronomic rates for total or partial
replacement of conventional N and P fertilizers. The actual amount of residual solids applied will
be dependent upon the nutrient requirement of the specific crop and the nutrient content of the
residual solids.
Residual solids application scheduling will be dependent upon residual solids production, storage at
the respective treatment plant, and the crop management program. On farms utilized for hay and
pasture production, residual solids will be applied in split applications as is normally done when
conventional fertilizers are applied to hay and pasture land. These applications will correspond
prior to grass growth in the spring, after each cutting in the growing season, or whenever most
appropriate. On farms utilized for row crops, residual solids will be applied between crop rotations.
(i
L The fields will receive residual solids in an agronomic manner based on requirements listed in
Permit Number WQ0000672. Residual solids will be applied at agronomic rates which are limited
by nitrogen loading rates. 'Soil pH will be adjusted immediately prior to or during residual solids
application to 6.0.
Prior to an application event, an application rate will be determined based on a current nutrient
analysis. Representative residual solids samples will be collected prior to the haul period and
composited for analysis. This composite sample will then be delivered to a qualified laboratory
familiar with residual solids analysis and analyzed for ammonia nitrogen, nitrate/nitrite nitrogen, %
total solids, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, sodium, copper,
zinc, cadmium, chromium, nickel, lead, aluminum, chlorides, sulfate, mercury, arsenic, selenium,
molybdenum and pH. Plant available nitrogen (PAN) will then be calculated from this residual

solids analysis. This information will be used to calculate the loading rate for the field and crop.
I
Once the appropriate application rate has been calculated, the residual solids will be removed. from
the respective treatment plant and transported to the site in trucks or tankers adapted for dewatered
or liquid residual solids: For liquid residual solids, the residual solids will be loaded into 6,500 to
7,000 gallon tankers converted to haul liquid,residual solids.
The tankers will then travel major traffic routes to the fields whenever possible. Once at the field,
the tanker will proceed to a designated staging area. The residual solids will then be transferred to a
liquid residual solids applicator designed and operated to obtain an even application consistent with
agricultural requirements. S&ME contracts the residual solids removal, hauling, and land
i application to Advanced Waste Management Services, Inc. which utilizes an AG Chem Terragator
2505 to land apply the residual solids.
All residual solids will be removed from the staging area by the end of the working day, unless
equipment breakdown or weather prohibits the residual solids application. At the start of each day,
all fields will be inspected by the field superintendent. Equipment will only enter a field when
conditions are appropriate for the application. Residual solids will only be applied when the field is
capable of supporting equipment without extensive rutting. When field conditions are not
appropriate for an application, such as during wet periods, the residual solids will remain at the
WWTP until field conditions are suitable for land application.
-- Prior to the residual solids operations, the field superintendent and appropriate City of Lumberton
personnel will inspect the site. During the field inspection, the field superintendent will note the
standard DWQ buffer zones including: homes, drainage ditches, roads, wells, surface water, and
property boundaries (listed in Table 1 below):

i
On the basis of these standard DWQ buffers for land treatment programs, buffers will be
established in the field. These buffers will be identified in the field by the placement of pin flags.
TABLE 1
DWQ Buffers for Current Permit WO0000672
Application Method
Injection or Surface
Area Description Incorporation Spreading
Property boundary
100 (50*)
100 (50*)
Public right of ways
50
50
Residences
200
400
Places of public assembly
200
400
Water supply sources
private
100
100
public
100
100
i Stream, lake or impoundment
50
100
Upslope drains or
water diversions
10
10
Downslope drains or
water diversions
25
25
Groundwater drainage systems
and surface drainage ditches
25
25
* Proposed sites in this package have been requested to have the 50 foot property line buffer
DWQ currently permits
3

SPILL CONTROL PLAN
CITY OF LUMBERTON
LUMBERTON, NORTH CAROLWA
In the case of a spill, the following action shall be taken immediately:
Halt the source of the spill: Ruptured line or valve, or damaged tank unit.
2. Contain spill: Use straw bales to form a barrier. Straw hay bales can be obtained from
several sources for this purpose. Soil near the site can also be used to form a barrier for
containment.
4
3. Clean up: Use residual solids application equipment to recover as much of the material
as possible. After the application equipment has recovered as much material as possible,
it will be land applied as per operation plan. A temporary sump pit may be dug in the
containment area and spilled material washed into it to enhance recovery.
4. Final Clean up: Any unrecoverable material will be washed from the road surface and
incorporated into an adjacent tillable area.
5. Notification: As soon as possible after a spill occurs notify:
A. Wastewater Treatment Plant (910) 671 - 3859
B. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office at (910) 486 - 1541 ,
C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office at [phone],
D. Robeson County Sheriff s Department [phone]
E.. Columbus County Sheriffs Department [phone]
F. Fire Department if assistance is required for washdown
G. S&N M, Inc. [phone]
6. Management of clean up efforts: The field superintendent shall take immediate charge
of the clean up activities. Additional labor will be requested from the treatment plant and
other departments as needed.
Reporting: Within 24 hours of a spill the field superintendent shall present a written
report detailing the cause of the spill and all action taken in response to the spill.

APPLICATION RATES
The residual solids application rate will be based on the plant available nitrogen (PAN) requirement
for the crop and the PAN content in the residual solids. The PAN requirement for the specific crop
will be derived from limits in current Permit No. WQ0000672 (Table 2). Crops typically grown in
-- the Robeson and Columbus County area are coastal bermuda, small grains, soybeans, com, fescue
and cotton.
TABLE 2
Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Limits for Crops
Commonly grown in Robeson and Columbus County
based on Permit No. WQ0000672
Crop Pan Recommendations
lbs/ac.
Bahiagrass
150
Coastal bermuda
350
Small grain
100
Soybeans
200
Corn (grain)
160
Corn (silage)
200
Fescue
250
Cotton
70
Soybeans are able to fix N2 as NH3 in a symbiotic relationship with a nitrogen fixing bacteria.
However, soybeans will utilize nitrogen if it is applied in a plant available form. Based on the
existing permit the application rate for soybeans shall not exceed 200 pounds of PAN per acre.
FI

The PAN content of the residual solids will be based on total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), ammonium -
nitrogen (•"14-N), nitrate -nitrogen (NO3 N), nitrite nitrogen (NO2 N) content, and the
mineralization of organic N into inorganic N. Most of the nitrogen in the residual solids is in an
organic form. As the residual solids are incorporated into the soil, the soil microorganisms utilize
the residual solids as an energy and nutrient source. In the process, a portion of the organic N is
mineralized or biologically converted into inorganic N.
Various environmental factors such as temperature, moisture, and carbon to nitrogen ratio will
affect the mineralization rate. Typical mineralization factors range from 0.2 to 0.4. A
mineralization rate of 0.30 has been selected for the WWTP residual solids because of the aerobic
digestion process. The PAN application rate will be calculated based on the mineralization rate,
TKN, NH4 N, NO3 N, NO2 N content, and method of application. Residual solids which are
injected into the soil typically retain a large portion of the NH3 gas which is found in the residual
solids or is converted from the NH4-N form. However, when the residual solids are surface applied
to hay or fallow row crop fields, a large portion of the NH; N is volatilized and lost as a nutrient for
crop uptake. The actual plant available nitrogen content for equal residual solids is less when the
residual solids are surface applied compared to when the residual solids are injected into the soil
_ and the NH3 N gas is trapped by the soil. To reflect the lower PAN content for surface applied
residual solids due to the volatilization of NH3 N gas, the portion of NH4-N in the residual solids
contributing to the PAN is reduced by 50%.
The PAN content of the residual solids is then calculated for injected and surface applications as
follows:
A. PAN injected = 0.30 (TKN - NH4-N) + NH4-N + NO3 N + NO2 N
B. PAN surface applied = 0.30 (TKN - NH4-N) + 0.5 (NH4-N) + N0; N + NO2-N
where:
0.30 = mineralization factor (aerobically digested residual solids)
Gl

TKN = Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
NH, N = Ammonium nitrogen
NO; N = Nitrate nitrogen
NOz N = Nitrite nitrogen
0.5 = Volatilization factor
PAN Applied = (gal/ac)(8.341b/gal)(0/o Solids)(% PAN)
w

WITUrTIMITATIM
The residual solids and soil will be sampled at specific intervals to insure the beneficial utilization
` for agricultural production. Residual solids samples will be obtained for each land application
event. The residual solids samples will be collected and delivered to a laboratory qualified to
analyze residual solids and is familiar with routine environmental sample preparation and
standards.
A residual solids analysis will be conducted for, but not limited to, the following parameters, %
total solids, chlorides, phosphorus, lead, copper, cadmium, sodium, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, nitrate
nitrogen, nitrite nitrogen, aluminum, magnesium, sulfate, potassium, zinc, nickel, chromium,
calcium, ammonia nitrogen, arsenic, mercury, selenium, molybdenum and pH. Annual TCLP
analysis for regulatory compliance will also be conducted.
Once each year, the fields will be sampled for routine soil fertility and lime requirements.
' i Although the soil samples will likely be collected in the fall or winter seasons, the soil samples may
also be collected between croppings. Once the soil samples are collected, the soil samples will be
delivered to either the North Carolina Department of Agriculture -Agronomic Division or A & L
Eastern Agricultural Laboratories, Inc. for routine soil analysis.
0

IC_ I t 1_,
Records pertinent to the successful management of the land applications program will be
maintained for the benefit of the landowner, DWQ, the City of Lumberton, and the contractor.
Each year an annual summary of the activities of the program will be prepared and delivered to the
appropriate agencies and participants on or before the 1st of March. The annual summary will
include:
1. A) Source of residual solids
B) Date of residual solids application
C) Location of residual solids application (field number)
D) Method of application
E) Weather conditions
F) Soil conditions
G) Type of crop or crop to be grown on field
H) Volume of residual solids applied in gallons/acre and dry tons/acre
I) Annual and cumulative totals of dry tons/acre of residual solids, annual and
cumulative pounds/acre of each heavy metal (which shall include, but not be
limited to lead, nickel, cadmium, copper, zinc, aluminum, arsenic, chromium,
mercury, selenium, and molybdenum), annual poundslacre of plant available
nitrogen (PAN), and annual pounds/acre of phosphorus applied to each field
2. A representative annual soil analysis which will include the following parameters:
standard soil fertility test, % base saturation, phosphorus, potassium, lead', zinc,
magnesium, pH, manganese, cation exchange capacity, sodium, nickel', cadmium',
copper, arsenic', mercury', molybdenum', selenium' and calcium.
3. A minimum of quarterly residual solids analysis which will include the following
parameters: % total solids, chlorides, phosphorus, lead, copper, cadmium, sodium,
total nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, nitrite nitrogen, aluminum, magnesium, sulfate,
potassium, zinc, nickel, chromium, calcium, ammonia nitrogen, arsenic, mercury,
selenium, molybdenum and pH.
' Soil analysis for these parameters shall be conducted once prior to permit renewal on each site which has received
sludge during the permit cycle.
c
19

SECTION II
LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS APPLICATION FORM
CITY OF LUMBERTON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources RECE Sys C510N
-- Division of Environmental Management wpaepOJW
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form 1441 2 4 j999
(THIS FORM MAYBE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
petnntttng
LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS NonOlschat90
This application is intended for facilities which are will be regulated under 40 CFR Part 503
I �
ti I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Applicant's name (please specify the name of the municipality, corporation, individual, etc.):
The City of Lumberton -
2. Print Owner's or Signing Official's name and title (the person who is legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
Mr. W. Todd Powell, City Manager
3. Mailing address: P.O. Box 1388
City: Lumberton State: North Carolina Zip: 28358
Telephone: ( 910 ) 671-3806
4. Application Date: May 1999
5. Fee Submitted: $ 325.00 [The permit processing fee should be as specified in 15A NCAC 2H .0205(c)(5).]
6. Specify whether these residuals will be land applied to: X agricultural lands, _forest, _public contact sites,
' reclamation sites; (Please be advised, if these residuals will be distributed for lawn or home garden use, the
application for the "DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS" should be completed rather than this application.)
7. If the alternative for residual disposal consists of "surface disposal" as defined under 40 CFR Part 503, please complete the
r- application titled "SURFACE DISPOSAL OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS." Please identify if there is any storage of residuals in a
surface impoundment or disposal thru landfilling. Explain:
' NIA
8. For Class B Residuals (or Class A Residuals to be land applied on a dedicated site), please specify the number of acres on
which residual solids are to be land applied under the authority of this permit:
Proposed in this application: 403.3 application acres; total (current and proposed): 2,245.86 application acres
9. County(ies) where residuals will be land applied: Robeson, Columbus
II. PERMIT INFORMATION
1. Application No. (will be completed by DEM):
2. Specify whether project is: new; renewal *; X modification
* For renewals, complete all sections included in the application, in addition, please submit updated cumulative loadings
for the ten (10) pollutants and updated owner's agreement for each site.
3. If this application is being submitted as a result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit, list the existing permit
number W00000672 and its issue date November 10, 1994
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 1 of 18

III. FACILITY INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals):
1. Name of facility where residuals are generated or prepared : Lumberton Wastewater Treatment Plant
1 2. Facility permit number: NC0024571 facility permit holder: City of Lumberton - W. Todd Powell
3. Specify whether facility in Section III.1 is owned by: _ federal; _ private; _state; X localgovernment.
jf 4. Specify facility design flow: 10 MGD; facility average daily flow: 6.5 MGD;
Type of residual storage: 3 aerobic digesters
Volume of residual storage: 2,400,000
Length of residuals storage at facility: 60-90 days (the Division requires a minimum 30 days storage in units that are
separate from treatment system, i.e. not in clarifiers, aeration basins, etc.);
it
Maximum storage time of residuals between application events: 120 days.
Estimated volume of residuals: 1,500 (dry tons/yr.);
5. Are there any other storage facilities, other than the above, currently on site: X Yes;_ No.
If Yes, please identify: Two 205,000 gal. tanks with lime stabilization facility.
6. Facility contact (person familiar with residuals preparation): Mr. Howard Revels
7. Facility contact's telephone number: ( 910 ). 671-3859
j 8. Location of treatment facility:North Carolina State; Robeson County
9. Mailing address: P.O. Box 1388
Lumberton, NC 28359-1388
—' 10. Latitude: 790 59' 30" Longitude: 340 36' 15"
11. Specify the source of the residuals: X treatment of domestic wastewater; X treatmenrof industrial wastewater;
other (explain):
Attach an explanation of either the treatment process, manufacturing process, or how the waste is generated. Provide full
i And complete details of the entire process.
12. Does the facility which generates the residuals have an approved pretreatment program? X Yes;_ No.
This includes facilities which are classified as a "Class I" facility (any publicly owned treatment works required, under 40
CFR 403.8, to have an approved pretreatment program or any facility treating domestic sewage that is classified as "Class
I" by the appropriate federal or State authority).
IV. RESIDUALS INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals):
1. Information for Hazardous Waste (RCRA) Determination. The information requested on the limitations specified below
pertain only to those residuals that are generated from a municipal wastewater treatment facility with industrial
contribution or active pretreatment program and from any other treatment facility with wastewater sources that include
industrial sources. * REFERENCE APPENDIX A
a. Are any of the residuals covered by this application listed in 40 CFR 261.31-261.33? _ Yes; X No. If Yes,
List the number(s):
b. Do the residuals exhibit any of the four characteristics defined by 40 CFR 261.31-261.33? _Yes; X No.
j Attach laboratory results for the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Analyses, Reactivity, Ignitability, and
Corosivity for each residual.
Note: If the following constituent levels (as determined by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Analyses) are
exceeded in the residuals or if the pH of the residual is not within the range listed below, the residual is by
definition a Hazardous Waste. Chemical analyses must be made to Minimum Detection Levels.
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 2 of 18

PPM
PPM
Arsenic
5.0
Barium
100.0
Benzene
0.5
Cadmium 1
1.0
Carbon tetrachloride
0.5
Chlordane
0.03
Chlorobenzene
100.0
Chloroform
6.0
Chromium
5.0
o-Cresol
200.0
m-Cresol
200.00
p-Cresol
200.0
Cresol
200.00
2,4-D
10.0
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
7.7
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.5
1,1-Dichloroethylene
0.7
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.13
Endrin
0.02
Heptachlor ( and its hydroxide)
0.008
Hexachlorobenzene
0.13
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
0.5
Hexachloroethane
3.0
Lead
5.0
Lindane
0.4
Mercury
0.2
Methoxychlor
10.0
Methyl ethyl ketone
200.0,
Nitrobenzene
2.0
Pentachlorophenol
100.0
Pyridine
5.0
Selenium
1.0
Silver
5.0
Tetmchloroethylene
0.7
Toxaphen
0.5
Trichloroethylene
0.5
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
400.0
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2.0
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
1.0
Vinyl chloride
0.2
pH (2:1 vol. / wt): >2.0s.u. - <12.5 s.0
NOTE: IF ANY OF THE RESIDUALS MEET THE DEFINITIONS OF A HAZARDOUS WASTE, AS
NOTED IN EITHER "A" OR "B" ABOVE, A PERMIT CANNOT BE ISSUED FOR THAT
RESIDUAL AND IT SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION.
2. For each residual, pleaserattach a complete chemical analysis of the. material. This analysis must be comprehensive enough to
completely characterize the residual and must be based upon a review of the process that generates the material. If the facility that will
generate the residual is not yet in operation, the characterization must be based on similar existing. facilities and projection based on the
type of facility. The analysis must include a minimum of the following parameters and any other known and suspected contaminants
that are tributary to the system.
Arsenic
Molybdenum
Cadmium
Nickel
Chromium
Selenium
Copper
Zinc
Lead
Aluminum
Mercury
Ammonia -Nitrogen
Calcium
Phosphorus.
Magnesium
Potassium
Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen
Sodium
%Total Solids
TKN
pH
Plant Available Nitrogen
(by calculation)
3. Wastewater residuals shall not be applied to the land if the concentration of any pollutant in the residuals exceeds the ceiling
concentrations specified in the table below. Specify the pollutant concentration of these residuals (attach lab analysis):
Pollutant
Pollutant Ceiling Concentration (mg/kg)
Dry Weight Basis
Pollutant Concentration (mg/kg)
Dry Weight Basis
Arsenic
75
1.610
Cadmium
85
1.000
Chromium
3000
322.0
Copper
4300
364.0
Lead
840
57.0
Mercury
57
1.14
Molybdenum
75
20.0
Nickel
420
20.0
Selenium
100
2.09
Zinc
7500
199.0
REFERENCE APPENDIX A
FORM: LARS 02/95
Page 3 of 18

V. PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional
LL- sources of residuals):
1. In accordance with 40 CFR Part 503, a residual cannot be land applied if it does not meet one of the following alternatives
for Class B pathogen reduction. * REFERENCE APPENDIX A
a Please specify a, b 1, b2, b3, b4, b5 or c from below (submit all lab analysis, test results and calculations):
a. at least seven residuals samples should be collected at the time of -use and analyzed for Fecal coliforms during each
monitoring period. The geometric mean of the densities of these samples will be calculated and should be less than
i 2,000,000 most probable number per gram of total dry solids, or less than 2,000,000 Colony Forming Units per gram
of total dry solids.
b. the residuals must be treated by one of the following "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens" (PSRP).
1. Aerobic Digestion - residuals are agitated with air or oxygen to maintain aerobic conditions for a specific mean cell
residence time and temperature between 40 days at 20°C and 60 days at 15°C.
a 2. Air Drying - residuals are dried on sand beds or on paved or unpaved basins for a minimum of three months.
During two of the three month, the ambient average daily temperature is above 0°C.
3. Anaerobic Digestion - residuali are treated in the absence of air for a specific mean cell residence time and
temperature between 15 days at 35°C to 55°C and 60 days at 20°C.
_ 4. Comnosting - using either the within -vessel, static aerated pile, or windrow composting methods, the temperature
of the residuals is raised to 400C or higher for five days. For four hours during the five days, the temperature in
the compost pile exceeds 55°C.
5. Lime Stabilization - sufficient lime is added to the residuals to raise the pH of the residuals to 12 after two hours
of contact.
c. The residuals shall be treated by a process that is equivalent to a "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens" (PSRP),
as determined by the permitting authority, based on an evaluation of the recommendations provided by the Pathogen
Equivalency Committee.
2. In addition, when residuals are being land applied, at least one of the following vector attraction reduction requirements (a,
b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, or j) described below must be met.
d
Specify the letter(s) of the vector attraction reduction requirement that have been met (submit lab results, test
results and calculations). Any variation of the below must be described in full detail and attached.
a.
Aerobic or Anaerobic Digestion - The mass of volatile solids are reduced by at least 38%. Volatile solids reduction is
measured between the residuals, prior to stabilization, and the residuals ready for use or disposal. This criterion should
be readily met by properly designed and operated anaerobic digestors, but not as readily met by aerobic digestors.
Treatment facilities with aerobic digestors may need to meet the vector attraction reduction requirement through 18c or
.'
18d.
b.
Anaerobic Digestion - If 38% volatile solids reduction cannot be achieved, vector attraction reduction can be
demonstrated by further digesting a portion of the previously digested residuals in a bench scale unit for an additional
("
40 days at 300C to 37°C. If, at the end of the 40 days, the volatile solids are reduced by less than 17%, vector
attraction reduction is achieved.
_? c.
Aerobic Digestion - If 38% volatile solids reduction cannot be achieved vector attraction reduction can be demonstrated
by further digesting a portion of the previously digested residuals that have a solids content of 2% or less in a bench
scale unit for an additional 30 days at 20°C. If, at the end of the 30 days, the volatile solids are reduced by less than
15%, vector attraction reduction is achieved.
d.
Aerobic Digestion - The specific oxygen uptake rate (SOUR) shall be equal to or less than 1.5 milligrams of oxygen
per hour per gram of total dry solids at 20°C.
e.
Aerobic Processes - The temperature of the residuals for at least 14 days shall be greater than 40°C. During this time,
the average temperature shall be greater than 45°C.
f.
Alkaline Stabilization - The pH of the residuals is raised to 12 or higher by alkali addition and, without the addition of
more alkali, remains at 12 or higher for 2 hours and then at 11.5 or higher for an additional 22 hours.
-j FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 4 of 18

l
g. Drying (stabilized solids) - The total solids of residuals that do not contain unstabilized solids, and which are generated
in a primary wastewater treatment process, shall be equal to or greater than 75%. Blending with other materials is not
allowed to achieve the total solids percentage.
h. Drying (unstabilized solids) The total solids of residuals that contains unstabilized solids, and which are generated in a
primary wastewater treatment process, shall be equal to or greater than 90%. Blending with other materials is not
allowed to achieve the total solids percentage.
i. Injection - Liquid residuals are injected below the land surface, with no significant amount of residuals present on the
land surface after 1 hour, unless the residuals are Class A for pathogen reduction. In this case, the residuals shall be
injected within 8 hours after being discharged from the pathogen treatment process.
,
j. Incorooration - Residuals that are surface land applied shall be incorporated into the soil within 6 hours of
application,unless the residuals are Class A for pathogen reduction. In this case, the residuals shall be incorporated
within 8 hours after discharge from the pathogen treatment process.
I VI. RESIDUALS TRANSPORT AND APPLICATION:
1. How will the residuals be delivered to the application sites (leak proof trucks, etc.)?
Reference Management Plan - Section I
,4
2. What type of equipment will be utilized for land application?
i Reference Management Plan - Section I
I
I— 3. How will the application of the residual be controlled to ensure that there is proper distribution over the site?
Reference Management Plan - Section I
4. Will the land application operation utilize a contractor who specializes in Residuals Management or will the permittee
manage the program? X Contractor; _ Permittee. If a contractor is utilized, provide the name of the firm, a
4 Contact, address, and telephone number: S&ME, Inc. 3718 Old Battleground Road
I�
Greensboro, NC 27410 [phone]
I Contact: Robert P. Willcox, Jr.
Jl
VIL SITE EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDED LOADING RATES:
1. The following sites are to be used for land application under this permit application [please attach map(s), see La.]:'
' Application Area [acres] Maximum Slope
Site No. County Owner/Lessee (Excluding'buffers) (in percent)
I
See Sections VI through X of this document
For Items 1 through 5 in this section.
i
Note: If more than ten (10) sites are to be covered by this application, please attach a form listing all of the sites along
�J with the information listed below:
a. A vicinity map must be attached. This map must show the location of each site in relation to at least two
geographical references and major intersection (numbered roads, named streamstrivers, etc.).
FORM: LARS 02195 Page 5 of 18

7
i b. For all new or modified sites, a detailed site location map must be attached delineating both total and buffered acres.
This map must be drawn to scale with topographical contour intervals not exceeding ten feet of 25% of total site relief
_ (whichever is more descriptive) and showing the property lines; all existing wells, all surface waters and drainage ways
and all dwellings within 500 feet of the land application areas; and all buffers.
Note: At least the following buffers must be maintained. If residuals are sprayed on the sites, larger buffers may be
required:
1. 400 feet from any habitable residence or place of public assembly under separate ownership or which is to be sold
for surface residual application,
200 feet from any habitable residence or place of public assembly under separate ownership or which is to be sold
for subsurface residual injection.
2. 100 feet between the disposal area and any public or private water supply source, all streams classified as WS or B,
waters classified as SA or SB and any Class I or Class II impounded reservoir used as a source of drinking watent
3. 100 feet between any surface residual application area and any stream, lake, river, or natural drainage way,
50 feet between any subsurface residual injection area and any stream, lake, river, or natural drainage way.t
4. 50 feet between the residual application area and property lines for both surface and subsurface application (if the
i
original permit was issued with the buffer distance to property line as 100 feet, updated
maps must be submitted and new acreage delineated for the buffer to be reduced).
5. 10 feet between the disposal area and any interceptor drains or surface water diversions (upslope).
6. 25 feet between the disposal area and any interceptor drains or surface water diversions (downslope).
7. 25 feet between the disposal area and any groundwater lowering and surface drainage ditches.
t SPECIFY THE NAME OF AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE CLOSEST DOWNSLOPE SURFACE WATERS
(as established by the Environmental Management Commission) TO THE LAND APPLICATION SITE(S). USE
THE ATTACHED INFORMATION SHEET (PAGE 9 OF 18) TO OBTAIN THIS INFORMATION.
Note: The maximum slope for land application of residuals is 10% for surface application and 18% for subsurface
! application.
2. For each land application site, attach a soil evaluation by a soils scientist (the evaluation must be signed by the soil
scientist) which addresses soil color; the depth, thickness and type of restrictive horizons; the presence or absence of a
r ; seasonal high water table or bedrock within three vertical feet of the deepest point of residual application; pH and cation
1. exchange capacity. If the depth to either groundwater or bedrock is less than three feet, please also attach a demonstration,
using predictive calculations or modeling methods acceptable to the Director of the Division of Environmental
Management, that the use of this site will not result in the contravention of classified groundwater standards as contained in
NCAC 2L .0200. In no case shall the separation be less than one foot. This report must be signed by the soil
scientist and submitted with application.
3. For each site, please attach a project evaluation conducted by an agronomist including recommendations concerning cover
crops and their ability to accept the proposed loading of liquids, solids; nitrogen, phosphorus, heavy metals, salts and any
other contaminant known to be in the residual. A part of the agronomist's recommendations must be a crop management
�! plan. This plan must determine the crops to be grown on the site(s), when they should be grown and how they should be
harvested and marketed. This report must be signed by the agronomist and submitted with application.
4. Attach a representative soils analysis of each site. The soils analysis shall include the following parameters, along with
any other significant parameter that has been shown to be contained in the residual:
U
Standard Soil Fertility Test (which includes): pH Phosphorus Potassium
_ Acidity Calcium Manganese'
Magnesium Zinc Copper
% Humic Matter Sodium Cation Exchange Capacity
Base Saturation (by calculation)
I And the following Metals: Arsenic Lead Nickel
Cadmium Mercury Selenium
Chromium Molybdenum
4'J 5. In order to assist DEM in the review of the proposed loading rates, please complete the calculations contained in the
attachment titled "Calculations Work Sheet" (beginning on Page 11 of 18). If more than one residual is to be covered by
this permit, additional worksheets must be attached.
FORM: LARS 02195 Page 6 of 18

VM. GENERAL INFORMATION:
W 1. Five (5) complete copies of the permit application and five (5) copies of all required supporting information, including
cover letters must be submitted or the application package will be returned as incomplete.
2. Please explain how access to the land application sites, by both people and animals, will be controlled following the
application of residuals: Existing fences will be used, when aonlicable, to control animals. Landowners will limit human
access.
a. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application sites within 30 days after the application of residuals.
J b. Appropriate measures must be taken to control public access to the land application sites during the active site use and
for 12 months following the last application event. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted at the site.
3. Please explain the procedures that will be used to establish and maintain the buffers during the application process (i.e. will
the sites be flagged): Pin flags (orange or white)
�( 4. Please attach an executed "Agreement For the Land Application of Residuals to Private Lands" for each land application
site that is not owned by the applicant. A copy of the DEM approved form is attached. If the applicant wishes to use a
different form or a modified form, prior approval must be received from DEM.
5. Each application site must be assigned a site identification number.
6. Attachments may be utilized to provide the information that is requested in this application form; however, if attachments
" are utilized, their location should be so indicated on the application form. All attachments must be numbered to correspond
to the individual parts of the application that require the attachment. If the attachments are part of a larger document ; -a
i table must be provided that lists the locations of the required information.
i
Applicant's Certification:
I, W. Todd Powell, City Manager attest that this application for Modification of Non -Discharge
Permit No. W00000672
has been reviewed by me and is accurate d corn to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and th f all aired upporting info tion and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incompl
+I
Signature Date 5 / 7 9 17
_ THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND
I I MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 7 of 18
?i

Instructions:
Processing of this application will not be initiated until five (5) copies of all of the following
items have been submitted in addition to five (5) copies of the completed application form. If
any of the below items have been excluded from the package, please explain.
1. Is a general location map included?
YES X or NO
_ 2. Is a site map (drawn to'scale) included which delineates total and buffered acres and
shows all property lines, buffers, existing wells within 500 feet, topography, drainage
features, and any surface waters?
YES X or NO
3. Is a vicinity map enclosed which clearly indicates the.project's location with respect to
State roads and named Surface waters?
YES X or NO
1,
4. Is a signed soil scientist report included which defines the following:
i a) field descriptions of texture, color, and structure,
J- b) depth and thickness of soil horizons,
c) presence of any restrictive soil horizons or layers,
I d) depth to seasonal high water table,
e) the hydraulic conductivity,
f) recommended loading rate for the site,
YES X or NO
_- 5. Is a signed agronomist's report included which identifies the crop and loading
recommendations for N-P-K?
YES X or NO
6. Is the Crop Management Plan included in the application package?
YES X or NO
I
7. Has the Land Owner's agreement been completed and signed?
YES X or NO
8. Appropriate fee in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0205(c)(5)-(eff. February 1, 1993):
New Applications, Modifications or Late Renewals $325.00
Timely Renewals without Modifications $250.00
I—; YES X or NO
9. Five (5) copies of all reports, evaluations, agreements, supporting calculations, etc. must be
included as a part of the application package.
FORM: LARS 02/95
Page 8 of 18

! SEE SECTIONS VI THROUGH X.
This form must be completed by the appropriate Regional Office and included with the
submission of the application package.
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
In order to determine the classification of the watershed in which these land application activities will be
located, you are required to submit this form, with items 1 through 8 completed, to the appropriate Division of
Environmental Management Regional Water Quality Supervisor (see attached listing). At a minimum, you
must include an 8.5" by 11" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the
subject surface waters. You must identify the location of the facility and the closest downslope surface waters
(waters for which you are requesting the classification) on the submitted map copy. The application may not
be submitted until this form is completed and included with the submittal.
1. Applicant (please specify the name of the municipality, corporation, individual, or other):
2. Name and Complete Address of Applicant:
City:
+ _ Telephone Number:'(___—)
'i
r�
U.
3. Project Name:
State:
4. Volume of residuals to be land applied:
5. Name of closest surface waters:
6. County(s) where land application site is located:
7. Map name and date:
8. Applicant Signature:
UTO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Zip:
dry tons per year
U Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where these land application activities
Will occur, as identified on the attached map segment:
Name of surface waters:
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission):
Proposed Classification, if applicable:
Signature of regional office personnel:
Date:
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 9 of 18

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGIONAL OFFICES (12/94)
Asheville Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Woodbin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Avery
Macon
Buncombe
Madison
Burke
McDowell
Caldwell
Mitchell
Cherokee
Polk
Clay
Rutherford
Graham
Swain
Haywood
Transylvania
Henderson
Yancy
Jackson
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson
Moore
Bladen
Robeson
Cumberland
Richmond
Harnett
Sampson
Hoke
Scotland
Montgomery
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alamance Rockingham
Alleghany Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Sorry
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Guilford
Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
Post Office Box 1507
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Beauport
Jones
Bertie
Lenoir
Camden
Martin
Chowan
Pamlico
Craven
Pasquotank
Currituck -
_ Perquimans
Dare
Pitt
Gats
Tyrell
Greene
Washington
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Alexander Mecklenburg
Cabarrus
Rowan
Catawba
Stanly
Gaston
Union
Iredell
Cleveland
Lincoln
Raleigh Regional WQ Supervisor
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Chatham
Durham
Edgecombe
Franklin
Granville
Halifax _
Johnston
Lee
Nash
Northampton
Orange
Person
Vance
Wake
Warren
Wilson
Wilmington Regional WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Brunswick New Hanover
Carteret Onslow
Columbus Pender
Duplin
FORM:- LARS 02/95 Page 10 of 18

J� CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
This work sheet is designed to assist the Division of Environmental Management in reviewing this application as expeditiously as
possible. Its preparation in a complete and accuratemanneris critical to this review. For permits that cover multiple sources of
residuals or different residuals from the same source, use additional work sheets.
A. List the specific residual that is covered by these calculations (place or process of origin)
What are the total dry tons of this residual to be land applied each year?
Total Dry Tons = Gallons of Residuals * % Solids' 8.34 lbs./gallon
produced annually 100
2,000 lbs./ton
Total Dry Tons = • _' 8.34 lbs./gallon
100
2,000 IbsJton
= 1,500 Dry Tons per year " Requested increase from currently permitted 1,100 dry tons per year
If the quantity of residual will vary significantly or if there will be a larger initial application, please attach a detailed
explanation and provide calculations for each variation.
B. Complete the following calculations to establish the portion of the residual that is made up of the various
parameters:
% Total Solids = 3.32 REFERENCE APPENDIX A
(PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL CONSTITUENTS ARE TO BE IN TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS)
PARAMETER
mg/L
_ % Solids (Decimal)
= mg/kg (dry wt.)
x 0.002
= Ibs./dry ton
Arsenic
=
x 0.002
= 0.003
Cadmium
=
x 0.002
= 0.002
Chromium
=
x 0.002
= 0.644
Copper
=
x 0.002
= 0.728
Lead
=
x 0.002
= 0.114
Mercury
=
x 0.002
= 0.002
Molybdenum
=
x 0.002
= 0.040 ;
Nickel
=
x 0.002
= 0.040
Selenium
=
x 0.002
= 0.004
Zinc
=
x 0.002
= 0.398
Ammonia-N
=
x 0.002
= 6.000
Calcium
=
x 0.002
= 45.000
Magnesium
=
x 0.002
= 7.000
NO3-NO2-N
=
x 0.002
= 0.020
Phosphorus
=
x 0.002
= 46.800
Potassium
=
x 0.002
= 9.600
Sodium
=
x 0.002
= 19.200
T1{N
=
x 0.002
= 113.200
FORM: LARS 02/95
Page 11 of 18

C. Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) calculations and land application area requirements:
0
CONSTITUENTS
Mg/Kg—DRY WEIGHT
TKN
56,600
AMMONIA-N
3,000
NO3-NO2-N
<10
1. Mineralization Rate (MR) 30 %
(These values can be established for the specific residual or default values can be used for domestic wastewater treatment
residuals. If actual values are established, attach the documentation. The default values are as follows):
Unstabilized Primary and Secondary Residuals 40%
Aerobically Digested Residuals 30%
Anaerobically Digested Residuals 20%
Composted Residuals 10%
Of the default values are used, attach an explanation as to why the specific chosen default value is appropriate.)
2. Complete the following calculations for the, application method proposed (Please note, the Mineralization
Rate [MR] should be utilized in the following calculations as a decimal):
PAN for Surface Application
PAN = [(MR) X (TKN — NH3)1+ .5 X (NH3) + (NO3 NOi N)
PAN = [ .30 X ( 56,600 - 3,000 )] +.SX ( 3,000 ) + 10
PAN = 17,590 PPM Dry Weight
PAN for Subsurface Application
PAN = [(MR) X (TKN — NH3)] + (NH3) + (NO3-NO2-N)
PAN = [ .30 X ( 56,600 - 3,000 )j + ( 3,000 ) + 10
PAN = 19,090 PPM Dry Weight
3. Total PAN to be land applied per year
Total dry tons of residual to be land applied per year: 1,500
Total PAN in pounds = (PAN in me/ke Dry Weight) X 2000 Pounds / Ton 17,590 X 2,000
per dry ton 1,000,000 1,000,000
= (PAN in PPM Dry Weight) X 0.002
= 35.18 Pounds/Dry Ton/Year (Surface applied)
Total PAN in pounds = (PAN in Pounds / Dry Ton) X Total tons of residual to be land applied
= 35.18 X 1,500
= 52,770 Pounds/Year
Due to the fact that organic nitrogen is mineralized slowly over time, the amount of nitrogen that comes available in years
following the initial application must be taken into consideration when calculating application rates for the subsequent
years. This being the case, please attach an evaluation of this factor and its impact on loading rates. Show the adjusted PAN
for at least five years (5yr. PAN + current PAN x 1,500 DT/Year) (20.91 + 35.18) X 1,500 DT/YR =
The maximum adjusted annual PAN is 84,135 Pounds/Year. (See attached calculations)
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 12 of 18

S&ME, Inc.
Greensboro, North Carolina
RESIDUAL PAN CALCULATION
Lumberton WWTP (Permit Modification Sorine'99)
TKN=
56,600 mg/kg
NH3=
3,000 mg/kg
NO3-NO2-N=
10 mg/kg
Min Rate--
0.30
PAN= [min.rate (TKN - NH3) + 0.5 (NH3) + NO3-NO2] * 0.002
J 0.30 53,600 1,500 10.00
PAN= 35.18 LBS/DT
Calculate residual nitrogen for years 2,3,4 and 5 following the initial application to determine
the amount of PAN/DT remaining.
2ND YEAR RESIDUAL PAN
j PAN= [min.rate (1st year org. - N 2nd year min. - N] * 0.002
0.15 53,600 16,080
PAN= 11.26 LBS/DT remaining from 1st year application
J 3RD YEAR RESIDUAL PAN
PAN= [min.rate (2nd year org. - N 3rd year min. - N] * 0.002 -
0.08 37,520 5,628
PAN= 5.10 LBS/DT remaining from 1st year application
4TH YEAR RESIDUAL PAN
�I
PAN= [min.rate (3rd year org. - N 4th year min. - N] * 0.002
0.05 31,892 2,551
{ PAN= 2.93 LBS/DT remaining from 1st year application
5TH YEAR RESIDUAL PAN
PAN= [min.rate (4th year org. - N 5th year min. - N] * 0.002
0.03 29,341 1,467
PAN= 1.62 LBS/DT remaining from Istyear application
Residual PAN from years 2 thru 5 after the initial application = 20.91 Lbs/Pan/DT
r.

4. Crop information on nitrogen uptake per year
Crop(s)
Alfalfa
Bermuda Grass (Hay, Pasture)
Blue Grass
Corn (Grain)
Corn (Silage)
Cotton
Fescue
Forest (Hardwood & Softwood)
Milo
Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Oats)
Sorghum, Sudex (Pasture)
Sorghum, Sudex (Silage)
Soybeans
Timothy, Orchard, & Rye Grass
Coastal Bermuda
(Division Recommendations)
PAN (lbs./acre/year)
200
220
120
160
200
70
250
75
100
100
180
220
200
200
350
(Provide for the Crops Specified)
PAN (lbs./acre/year)
200
220
120
160
200
70
250
75-
100
100
180
220
200
200
350
Please provide the basis for the uptake rates used if different than Division Recommendation:
5. Total acres needed to land apply the pounds of available nitrogen calculated above
Total acres needed = Maximum total pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN)
Pounds of nitrogen needed for crop*
84,135 - 100
( Minimum acres needed based on most restrictive PAN = 842 acres
* This value must be the value for the crop to be grown that has the lowest nitrogen uptake rate per acre.
If there are various crops that will only be utilized for certain sites, please attach the calculations for each site and determine
the total needed acres using the format outlined below.
D. Calculate the Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
`J (** This section must be completed in mg/l, to convert: mg/kg X % solids [as a decimal] = mg/1 **)
! SAR = Na Milli Equivalent _ [0.5 (Ca Milli Equivalent + Mg Milli Equivalent)]"
CONCENTRATION (mg/1) _ q g = q Equivalent Weight Milli Equivalents of Ion
SODIUM (Na) 318.72 (mg/1) _ 23 = 13.857
— CALCIUM (Ca) 747 (mg/1) + 20 = 37.350
MAGNESIUM(Mg) 116.2 (mg/1) _ 12 = 9.683
SAR = 2.858 (See attached calculation sheet)
a
FORM: LARS 02/95
Page 13 of 18

SAR
L'
Page 1

If calculation sheets are being completed for more than one residual or site, please attach a
summary sheet that brings the results of all the calculations sheets to one point.
E. Determine the Site Life for this land application site:
The lifetime pollutant loadings shall not be exceeded. The site life is determined by calculating the number of years that the site
can receive the residual without exceeding the lifetime pollutant loadings. The site life calculations will be based on the most
restrictive crop plant available nitrogen (PAN) requirement specifiied and the maximum dry tons or residuals to be land applied
annually. Therefore, in the table below the Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year will be calculated as:
1. Most restrictive crop based on the plant available nitrogen (PAN) requirement: small grains
Associated plant available nitrogen (PAN) requirement: 100 (Ibs./acre/year)
2. Minimum acres needed based on most restrictive PAN (as found in C.5 above): 842 acres
3. Dry Tons of Residuals to be land applied per year: 1,500 dry tons per year
-_ 4. Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year = Dry Tons/Year of Residuals to be land applied
Minimum number of acres required for land application
Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year = 1.78
If any of the application sites are to be loaded at greater than the rate specified above, please specify the loading rate and explain:
Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year (different from above) _
Explanation:
In the table below, the highest annual loading (Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year) specified above, will be multiplied
by the Ibs./dry ton of each pollutant as found in B above. The Site Life can then be determined by:
Site Life (Years) = Allowable Lifetime Loadings (lbs./acre)
Projected Pounds to be Applied/Acre/Year
Pollutant
Tons of
Residuals to be
Applied per
Acre per Year
Ibs./dry ton of each
pollutant
(as found in Part B
above)
Projected
Pounds to be
Applied/Acre
Near
Allowable Lifetime
Pollutant Loadings
(Ibs./acre)
Site Life
(Years)
Arsenic
1.78 *
0.003 =
0.0053
36
= 6,792
Cadmium
1.78 *
0.002 =
0.0036
34
= 9,444
Chromium
1.78 *
0.644 =
1.1463
2,677
= 2,335
Copper
1.78 *
0.728 =
1.2958
1,338
= 1,032
Lead
1.78 *
0.114 =
0.2029
267
= 1,315
Mercury
1.78 *
0.002 =
0.0036
15
= 4,166
Nickel
1.78 *
0.040 =
0.0712
374
= 5,252
Selenium
1.78 *
0.004 =
0.0071
89
= 12,535
Zinc
1.78 *
1 0.398 =
1 0.7084
2,498
= 3,526
Compare the nine (9) pollutants above and determine which pollutant will result in the shortest life for this site.
The Limiting Pollutant is Copper
The Site Life is 1,032 years.
FORM: LARS 02195
Page 14 of 18

North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
TO PRIVATE LANDS
SEE SECTIONS VI THROUGHX
Permittee:
Contact
Address of Permittee:
List of wastewater residuals to be applied to these lands:
i
Site ID Number:
Field Number:
Location of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site):
Owner of Property used for residual application:
Lessee of Property (if appropriate):
LLand use or cropping patterns:
L� Intended use or disposition of crops:
l
J
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits
!I
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location shown as
described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The landowner or his representative
receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permittee receives, in
consideration, the use of the land described above for the disposal of wastewater residuals. This agreement shall remain
in effect for the length of the Division of Environmental Management land application permit and shall be renewed each
time the land application permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to
abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in
advance, modifies or cancels this Land owner's Agreement.
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 15 of 18

STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or
their representatives to inspect each parcel of property prior to, during, and after residual
application and to establish monitoring facilities on or near the application site as required by the
residual land application permit.
4_
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their
representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, and
twelve (12) months after termination of, this Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application
permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resouces
(NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management (DEM) for the land described above prior
to commencement of residual application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum
application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with information and data
concerning the program for land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes
an analysis of constituents of the residual, residual application methods and schedules for typical
cropping patterns and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee for residual application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each
soil analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application.
Residuals may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a sufficient amount of lime is
Lalso applied to achieve a final pH of the lime, residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
7. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to
L� the intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the
Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the
—, limits of the NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will
determine residual application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the results of soil
samples.
8. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the
permit.
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement
for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public
' access to the land application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period
_ following residual application. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
4 activities being conducted at each site.
11. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee
or Land Owner (Lessee) prior to and during application.
FORM: LARS 02195 Page 16 of 18

12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third
party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the
terms and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all
provisions of this Agreement.
14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto
with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a thirty (30) day period following
the residual application. Application sites that are to be use for grazing shall have fencing that will
be used to prevent access during these periods after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of land to a new owner, a permit modification must be requested and obtained
from the Division of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and
agreements. In addition, a notice shall be given by the current landowner to the new landowner
that gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or
i place on or related to the application site and facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of
determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under
the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or
leachate.
—� 18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with
another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement.
The land application of any additional wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals
- specified by this permit, is prohibited.
Land Owner: Operator:
Address: Address:
Phone No.: Phone No.:
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 17 of 18

1, have read this land owner's agreement and do
hereby grant permission to the Permittee to apply sludge/residual to my lands as specified herein.
Land Owner
- Date
NORTH CAROLINA, COUNTY,
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of 19
— NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires
SEAL:
* * s s * s s * s * * * * * s s * *sss * s s *sss * * * * * *sss * * * * s s s s s
have read this land owner's agreement and do
hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
I
Lessee
Date
I, have read this land owner's agreement and do hereby agree to
abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
1 Permittee
Date
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 18 of 18

SECTION III
CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
CITY OF LUMBERTON WATER TREATMENT PLANT'
0

LUMBERTON WTP
III. FACILITY INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals):
1. Name of facility where residuals are generated or prepared : City of Lumberton Water Treatment Plant
2. Facility permit number: N/A facility permit holder: City of Lumberton, NC
3. Specify whether facility in Section III.1 is owned by: _ federal; _ private; _state; X local government.
4. Specify facility design flow: MGD; facility average daily flow: MGD;
Type of residual storage: 5 acre lagoon
Volume of residual storage: 2 years
Length of residuals storage at facility: N/A days (the Division requires a minimum 30 days storage in units that are
separate from treatment system, i.e. not in clarifiers, aeration basins, etc.);
Maximum storage time of residuals between application events: 730+ days.
Estimated volume of residuals: 400 (dry tons/yr.);
5. Are there any other storage facilities, other than the above, currently on site: _Yes: X No.
If Yes, please identify:
6. Facility contact (person familiar with residuals preparation): Johnny Strickland
7. Facility contact's telephone number: 910 671-3857
S. Location of treatment facility:
North Carolina State; Robeson
9. Mailing address: P.O. Box 1388
Lumberton, NC 28359-1388
10. Latitude: 34037' 50" Longitude: 790 0 V 40"
11. Specify the source of the residuals:_ treatment of domestic wastewater;_treatment of industrial wastewater;
X other (explain): Treatment of water.
County
Attach an explanation of either the treatment process, manufacturing process, or how the waste is generated. Provide full
And complete details of the entire process.
12. Does the facility which generates the residuals have an approved pretreatment program?_Yes; X No.
This includes facilities which are classified as a "Class r' facility (any publicly owned treatment works required, under 40
CFR 403.8, to have an approved pretreatment program or any facility treating domestic sewage that is classified as "Class
I" by the appropriate federal or State authority).
IV. RESIDUALS INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals):
1. Information for Hazardous Waste (RCRA) Determination. The information requested on the limitations specified below
pertain only to those residuals that are generated from a municipal wastewater treatment facility with industrial
contribution or active pretreatment program and from any other treatment facility with wastewater sources that include
industrial sources.
a. Are any of the residuals covered by this application listed in 40 CFR 261.31-261.33? _ Yes; X No. If Yes,
List the number(s):
b. Do the residuals exhibit any of the four characteristics defined by 40 CFR 261.31-261.33? _Yes; X No.
Attach laboratory results for the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Analyses, Reactivity, Ignitability, and
Corrosivity for each residual.
Note: If the following constituent levels (as determined by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Analyses) are
exceeded in the residuals or if the pH of the residual is not within the range listed below, the residual is by
definition a Hazardous Waste. Chemical analyses must be made to Minimum Detection Levels.
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 2 of 18

LUMBERTON WTP
PPM
PPM
Arsenic
5.0
Barium
100.0
Benzene
0.5
Cadmium
1.0
Carbon tetrachloride
0.5
Chlordane
0.03
Chlorobenzene
100.0
Chloroform
6.0
Chromium
5.0
o-Cresol
200.0
m-Cresol
200.00
p-Cresol
200.0
Cresol
200.00
2,4-D
10.0
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
7.7
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.5
1,1-Dichloroethylene
0.7
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.13
Endrin
0.02
Heptachlor ( and its hydroxide)
0.008
Hexachlorobenzene
0.13
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
0.5
Hexachloroethane
3.0
Lead
5.0
Lindane
0.4
Mercury
0.2
Methoxychlor
10.0
Methyl ethyl ketone
200.0
Nitrobenzene
2.0
Pentachlorophenol
100.0
Pyridine -
5.0
Selenium
1.0
Silver
5.0
Tetrachloroethylene
0.7
Toxaphen
0.5
Trichloroethylene
0.5
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
400.0
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2.0
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
1.0
Vinyl chloride
0.2
pH (2:1 vol. / wt): >2.0s.u. - <l2.5 s.0
NOTE: IF ANY OF THE RESIDUALS MEET THE DEFINITIONS OF A HAZARDOUS WASTE, AS
NOTED IN EITHER "A" OR "B" ABOVE, A PERMIT CANNOT BE ISSUED FOR THAT
RESIDUAL AND IT SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION.
2. For each residual, please attach a complete chemical analysis of the material. This analysis must be comprehensive enough to
completely characterize the residual and must be based upon a review of the process that generates the material. If the facility that will
generate the residual is not yet in operation, the characterization must be based on similar existing facilities and projection based on the
j type of facility. The analysis must include a minimum of the following parameters and any other known and suspected contaminants
that are tributary to the system.
- Arsenic Molybdenum Calcium Phosphorus
I' Cadmium Nickel Magnesium Potassium
Chromium Selenium Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen Sodium
Copper Zinc %Total Solids TKN
Lead Aluminum pH
Mercury Ammonia -Nitrogen Plant Available Nitrogen
(by calculation) '
3. Wastewater residuals shall not be applied to the land if the concentration of any pollutant in the residuals exceeds the ceiling
concentrations specified in the table below. Specify the pollutant concentration of these residuals (attach lab analysis):
Pollutant
Pollutant Ceiling Concentration (mgtkg)
Dry Weight Basis
Pollutant Concentration (mg/kg)
Dry Weight Basis
Arsenic
75
4.85
Cadmium
85
<1.00
Chromium
3000
138
Copper
4300
42
Lead
840
138
Mercury
57
0.53
Molybdenum
75
49
Nickel
420
18
Selenium
100
2.32
Zinc
7500
206
REFERENCE APPENDIX A
FORM: LARS 02/95
Page 3 of 18

LUMBERTON WTP
V. PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional
sources of residuals): Does not apply to WTP.
1. In accordance with 40 CFR Part 503, a residual cannot be land applied if it does not meet one of the following alternatives
for Class B pathogen reduction.
Please specify a, bl, b2, b3, b4, b5 or c from below (submit all lab analysis, test results and calculations):
a. at least seven residuals samples should be collected at the time of use and analyzed for Fecal coliforms during each
monitoring period. The geometric mean of the densities of these samples will be calculated and should be less than
2,000,000 most probable number per gram of total dry solids, or less than 2,000,000 Colony Forming Units per gram
of total dry solids.
b. the residuals must be treated by one of the following "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens" (PSRP).
1. Aerobic Digestion - residuals are agitated with air or oxygen to maintain aerobic conditions for a specific mean cell
residence time and temperature between 40 days at 20°C and 60 days at 15°C.
2. Air Drying - residuals are dried on sand beds or on paved or unpaved basins for a minimum of three months.
During two of the three month, the ambient average daily temperature is above 0°C.
3. Anaerobic Digestion - residuals are treated in the absence of air for a specific mean cell residence time and
temperature between 15 days at 35°C to 55°C and 60 days at 20°C.
4. Composting - using either the within -vessel, static aerated pile, or windrow composting methods, the temperature
' of the residuals is raised to 40°C or higher for five days. For four hours during the five days, the temperature in
the compost pile exceeds 55°C.
5. Lime Stabilization - sufficient lime is added to the residuals to raise the pH of the residuals to 12 after two hours
of contact.
c.
The residuals shall be treated by a process that is equivalent to a "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens" (PSRP),
as determined by the permitting authority, based on an evaluation of the recommendations provided by the Pathogen
Equivalency Committee.
j 2. In addition, when residuals are being land applied, at least one of the following vector attraction reduction requirements (a,
b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, or j) described below must be met.
Specify the letter(s) of the vector attraction reduction requirement that have been met (submit lab results, test
results and calculations). Any variation of the below must be described in full detail and attached.
_ a.
Aerobic or Anaerobic Digestion - The mass of volatile solids are reduced by at least 38%. Volatile solids reduction is
measured between the residuals, prior to stabilization, and the residuals ready for use or disposal. This criterion should
L _
be readily met by properly designed and operated anaerobic digesters, but not as readily met by aerobic digestors.
Treatment facilities with aerobic digestors may need to meet the vector attraction reduction requirement through 18c or
18d.
b.
Anaerobic Digestion - If 38% volatile solids reduction cannot be achieved, vector attraction reduction can be
`
demonstrated by further digesting a portion of the previously digested residuals in a bench scale unit for an additional
40 days at 300C to 37°C. If, at the end of the. 40 days, the volatile solids are reduced by less than 17%, vector
attraction reduction is achieved.
-1 c.
Aerobic Digestion - If 38% volatile solids reduction cannot be achieved, vector attraction reduction can be demonstrated
by further digesting a portion of the previously digested residuals that have a solids content of 2% or less in a bench
scale unit for an additional 30 days at 20°C. If, at the end of the 30 days, the volatile solids are reduced by less than
_
15%, vector attraction reduction is achieved.
d.
Aerobic Digestion - The specific oxygen uptake rate (SOUR) shall be equal to or less than 1.5 milligrams of oxygen
per hour per gram of total dry solids at 20°C.
e.
Aerobic Processes - The temperature of the residuals for at least 14 days shall be greater than 40°C. During this time,
the average temperature shall be greater than 45°C.
f.
Alkaline Stabilization - The pH of the residuals is raised to 12 or higher by alkali addition and, without the addition of
more alkali, remains at 12 or higher for 2 hours and then at 11.5 or higher for an additional 22 hours"
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 4 of 18

LUMBERTON WTP
CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
This work sheet is designed to assist the Division of Environmental Management in reviewing this application as expeditiously as
-" possible. Its preparation in a complete and accurate manner is critical to this review. For permits that cover multiple sources of
residuals or different residuals from the same source, use additional work sheets.
A. List the specific residual that is covered by these calculations (place or process of origin)
What are the total dry tons of this residual to be land applied each year?
Total Dry Tons = Gallons of Residuals * % Solids * 8.34 lbs./gallon
produced annually 100
2,000 lbs./ton
Total Dry Tons = * _ * 8.34 lbs./gallon
100
2,000 lbsJton
400 Dry Tons per year
If the quantity of residual will vary significantly or if there will be a larger initial application, please attach a detailed
explanation and provide calculations for each variation.
B. Complete the following calculations to establish the portion of the residual that is made up of the various
parameters:
% Total Solids = 2.49
(PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL CONSTITUENTS ARE TO BE IN TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS)
PARAMETER
mg/L
_ % Solids (Decimal)
= mg/kg (dry wt.)
x 0.002
=1bs./dry ton
Arsenic
=
x 0.002
= 0.010
Cadmium
=
x 0.002
= 0.002
Chromium
=
x 0.002
= 0.276
Copper
=
x 0.002
= 0.084
Lead
=
x 0.002
= 0.276
Mercury
=
x 0.002
= 0.001
Molybdenum
=
x 0.002
= 0.098
Nickel
=
x 0.002
= 0.036
Selenium
=
x 0.002
= 0.005
Zinc
=
x 0.002
= 0.412
Ammonia-N
=
x 0.002
= 0.800
Calcium
=
x 0.002
= 15.800
Magnesium
=
x 0.002
= 1.600
NO3-NO2-N
=
x 0.002
= 0.020
Phosphorus
=
x 0.002
6.800
Potassium
=
x 0.002
= 1.000
Sodium
=
x 0.002
= 2.000
TKN
=
x 0.002
= 19.200
KEkERLINUE Arr> tvutxA
FORM: LARS 02/95
Page 11 of 18

LUMBERTON WTP
C. Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) calculations and land application area requirements:
CONSTITUENTS
Mg/Kg — DRY WEIGHT
TKN
9,600
AMMONIA-N
400
NO3-NO2-N
<I0
1. Mineralization Rate (MR) 30 %
(These values can be established for the specific residual or default values can be used for domestic wastewater treatment
residuals. If actual values are established, attach the documentation. The default values are as follows):
Unstabilized Primary and Secondary Residuals 40%
Aerobically Digested Residuals 30%
Anaerobically Digested Residuals 20%
Composted Residuals 10%
Of the default values are used, attach an explanation as to why the specific chosen default value is appropriate.)
2. Complete the following calculations for the application method proposed (Please note, the Mineralization
Rate [MR] should be utilized in the following calculations as a decimal):
PAN for Surface Application
PAN = [(MR) X (TKN — NH3)] + .5 X (NH3) + (NO3 NO2 N)
PAN = [ .301 X ( 9,600 400 )] + .5X ( 400 ) + 10
PAN = 2,970 PPM Dry Weight
PAN for Subsurface Application
PAN = [(MR) X (TKN — NH3)] + (NH3) + (NO3-NOZ N)
PAN=[ X( )]+( )+
PAN = PPM Dry Weight
3. Total PAN to be land applied per year
Total dry tons of residual to be land applied per year: 400
Total PAN in pounds ='(PAN in mg/kg Dry Weight) X 2000 Pounds / Ton 2,970 X 2,000'
per dry ton 1,000,000 1,000,000
= (PAN in PPM Dry Weight) X 0.002
= 5.94 Pounds/Dry Ton/Year (Surface applied)
Total PAN in pounds = (PAN in Pounds / Dry Ton) X Total tons of residual to be land applied
= 5.94 X 400
= 2,376 Pounds/Year
Due to the fact that organic nitrogen is mineralized slowly over time, the amount of nitrogen that comes available in years
following the initial application must be taken into consideration when calculating application rates for the subsequent
years. This being the case, please attach an evaluation of this factor and its impact on loading rates. Show the adjusted PAN
for at least five years (5yr. PAN + current PAN x 400 DT/Year) (3.59 + 5.94) X 400 DT/YR =
The maximum adjusted annual PAN is 3,812 Pounds/Year. (See next page)
FORM: LARS 02/95
Page 12 of 18

CITYOF LUMBERTON
LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
RESIDUALS ANALYSIS
Residual Type: Water Treatment Plant
Date Sampled: 1/12/99
Date Reported: 1120/99
% Solids: 2.49
DH: 6.3
Permit No. W00000672
M
Nitrogen (TKN)
0;960
9,600.000
19.200
Phosphorus
0.340
3,400.000
6.800
Potassium
0.050
500.000
1.000
PAN (injected)*
0.316
3,160.000
6.320
PAN (surface)*
0.296
2,960.000
5.920
Ammonia Nitrogen
0.040
400.000
0.800
Calcium
0.790
7,900.000
15.800
Calcium Carbonate Eq.
--
--
Magnesium
0.080
800.000
1.600
Sodium
0.100
1,000.000
2.000
Sulfate
0.098
980.000
1.960
Nitrate N + Nitrite N
---
<10.000
0.000
Manganese
---
225.000
0.450
Chloride
---
1,980.00
3.960
Iron
21,600.00
43.200
Aluminum
---
137,200.000
274.400
Arsenic
4.850
0.010
Cadmium
<1.000
0.000
Chromium
138.000
0.276
Copper
---
42.000
0.084
Lead
---
138.000
0.276
Mercury
---
0.530
0.001
Molybdenum
49.000
0.098
Nickel
---
18.000
0.036
Selenium
2.320
0.005
Zinc
206.000
0.412
A&L Eastern Laboratories Report No.: R00I-167
*Determination of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN):
Injected Application: 0.316 % PAN
(Mineralization Rate)(TKN-Ammonia N) + Ammonia N + Nitrate N + Nitrite N = % PAN
Surface Application: 0.296 % PAN
(Mineralization Rate)(TKN-Ammonia N) + (0.5)(Ammonia N) + Nitrate N + Nitrite N = % PAN
Prepared by S&ME, Inc. 4/27/99

S&ME, Inc.
Greensboro, North Carolina.
RESIDUAL PAN CALCULATION
Lumberton WTP (Permit Modification Soring'99)
TKN= 9,600 mg/kg
NH3= 400 mg/kg
NO3-NO2-N= 10 mg/kg
Min Rate= 0.30
PAN= [min.rate (TKN - NH3) + 0.5 (NH3) + NO3-NO21 * 0.002
0.30 9,200 200 10.00
PAN= 5.94 LBS/DT
Calculate residual nitrogen for years 2,3,4 and 5 following the initial application to determine
the amount of PAN/DT remaining.
—' 2ND YEAR RESIDUAL PAN
�J PAN= [min.rate (1st year org. - N 2nd year min. - N] * 0.002
0.15 9,200 2,760
F] PAN= 1.93 LBS/DT remaining from 1 st year application
3RD YEAR RESIDUAL PAN
PAN= [min.rate (2nd year org. - N 3rd year min. - N] * 0.002
0.08 6,440 966
PAN= 0.88 LBS/DT remaining from 1 st year application
I 4TH YEAR RESIDUAL PAN
—I PAN= [min.rate (3rd year org. - N 4th year min. - N] * 0.002
0.05 5,474 438
PAN= 0.50 LBS/DT remaining from Istyear application
5TH YEAR RESIDUAL PAN - - - -
I
J
PAN= [min.rate (4th year org. - N 5th year min. - N] * 0.002
0.03 5,036 252
L` PAN= 0.28 LBS/DT remaining from 1st year application
Residual PAN from years 2 thru 5 after the initial application = 3.59 Lbs/Pan/DT

LUMBERTON WTP
- 4. Crop information on nitrogen uptake per year
Crop(s)
Alfalfa
Bermuda Grass (Hay, Pasture)
Blue Grass
Corn (Grain)
Corn (Silage)
Cotton
Fescue
Forest (Hardwood & Softwood)
Milo
Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Oats)
Sorghum, Sudex (Pasture)
Sorghum, Sudex (Silage)
Soybeans
Timothy, Orchard, & Rye Grass
Coastal Bermuda
(Division Recommendations)
PAN (lbs./acre/year)
200
220
120
160
200
70
250
75
100
100
180
220
200
200
350
(Provide for the Crops Specified)
PAN (lbs./acre/year)
200
220
120
160
200
70
250
75
100
100
180
220
200
200
350
Please provide the basis for the uptake rates used if different than Division Recommendation:
5. Total acres needed to land apply the pounds of available nitrogen calculated above
Total acres needed = Maximum total pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN)
Pounds of nitrogen needed for crop*
3,812 - 100 (small grain)
Minimum'acres needed based on most restrictive PAN = 39 acres
• This value must be the value for the crop to be grown that has the lowest nitrogen uptake rate per acre.
If there are various crops that will only be utilized for certain sites, please attach the calculations for each site and determine
the total needed acres using the format outlined below.
D. Calculate the Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
(** This section must be completed in mg/l, to convert: mg/kg X % solids [as a decimal] = mg/l **)
SAR = Na Milli Equivalent + [0.5 (Ca Milli Equivalent + Mg Milli Equivalent)]"
CONCENTRATION
(mg/1) +
Equivalent Weight
= Milli Equivalents of Ion
SODIUM (Na)
24.9 (mg/1) +
23
= 1.083
CALCIUM (Ca)
196.71 (mg/l)+
20
= 9.836
MAGNESIUM(Mg)
19.92 (mg/l)+
12
= 1.660
SAR = 0.452
(See attached SAR sheet)
FORM: LARS 02/95
Page 13 of 18

SAR
11
..erton
VVTP Permit Modification
Page 1

LUMBERTON WTP
If calculation sheets are being completed for more than one residual or site, please attach a
summary sheet that brings the results of all the calculations sheets to one point.
E. Determine the Site Life for this land application site:
The lifetime pollutant loadings shall not be exceeded. The site life is determined by calculating the number of years that the site
can receive the residual without exceeding the lifetime pollutant loadings. The site life calculations will be based on the most
restrictive crop plant available nitrogen (PAN) requirement specified and the maximum dry tons or residuals to be land applied
annually. Therefore, in the table below the Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year will be calculated as:
1. Most restrictive crop based on the plant available nitrogen (PAN) requirement: small grains
Associated plant available nitrogen (PAN) requirement: 100 (Ibs./acre/year)
2. Minimum acres needed based on most restrictive PAN (as found in C.5 above): 39 acres
3. Dry Tons of Residuals to be land applied per year: 400 dry tons per year
4. Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year = Dry Tons/Year of Residuals to be land applied
Minimum number of acres required for land application
Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year = 10.25
If any of the application sites are to be loaded at greater than the rate specified above, please specify the loading rate and explain:
Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year (different from above) _
Explanation:
In the table below, the highest annual loading (Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year) specified above, will be multiplied
by the Ibs./dry ton of each pollutant as found in B above. The Site Life can then be determined by:
Site Life (Years) = Allowable Lifetime Loadings (Ibs./acre)
{ Projected Pounds to be Applied/Acre/Year
L
Pollutant
Tons of
Residuals to be
Applied per
Acre per Year
Ibs./dry ton of each
pollutant
(as found in Part B
above)
Projected
Pounds to be
Applied/Acre
/Year
Allowable Lifetime
Pollutant Loadings
(Ibs./acre)
Site Life
(Years)
Arsenic
10.25 *
0.010 =
0.1025
36
= 351
Cadmium
10.25 *
0.002 =
0.0205
34
= 1,658
Chromium
10.25 *
0.276 =
2.829
2,677
= 946
Copper
10.25 *
0.084 =
0.861
1,338
= 1,554
Lead
10.25 *
0.276 =
2.829
267
= 94
Mercury
10.25 *
0.001 =
0.010
15
= 1,500
Nickel
10.25 *
0.098 =
1.004
374
= 372
Selenium
10.25 *
0.005 =
0.0512
89
= 1,738
Zinc
10.25 *
0.412 =
4.223
2,498
= 591
Compare the nine (9) pollutants above and determine which pollutant will result in the shortest life for this site.
The Limiting Pollutant is Lead
The Site Life is 94 years.
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 14 of 18

SECTION IV
CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
COMBINATION OF LUMBERTON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
-- AND LUMBERTON WATER TREATMENT PLANT

LUMBERTON - WEIGHTED AVERAGES FOR BOTH SOURCES
PPM
PPM
Arsenic
5.0
Barium
I00.0
Benzene
0.5
Cadmium
1.0
Carbon tetrachloride
0.5
Chlordane
0.03
Cblorobeazene
100.0
Chloroform
6.0
Chromium
5.0
o-Cresol
200.0
m-Cresol
200.00
p-Cresol
200.0
Cresol
200.00
2,4-D
10.0
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
7.7
I,2-Dichloroethane
0.5
1,1-Dichloroethylene
0.7
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.13
Endrin
0.02
Heptachlor ( and its hydroxide)
0.008
Hexachlorobeazene
0.13
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
0.5
Hexachloroethane
3.0
Lead
5.0
Lindane
0.4
Mercury
0.2
Methoxychlor
10.0
Methyl ethyl ketone
200.0
Nitrobenzene
2.0
Pentachlorophenol
100.0
Pyridine
5.0 -
Selenium
LO
Silver
5.0
Tetrachloroethylene
0.7
Toxaphen
0.5
Trichloroethylene
0.5
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
400.0
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2.0
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
1.0
Vinyl chloride
0.2
pH (2:1 vol. / wt): >2.0s.u. - <12.5 s.0
NOTE: IF ANY OF THE RESIDUALS MEET THE DEFINITIONS OF A HAZARDOUS WASTE, AS
NOTED IN EITHER "A" OR "B" ABOVE, A PERMIT CANNOT BE ISSUED FOR THAT
RESIDUAL AND IT SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION.
2. For each residual, please attach a complete chemical analysis of the material. This analysis must be comprehensive enough to
completely characterize the residual and must be based upon a review of the process that generates the material. If the facility that will
generate the residual is not yet in operation, the characterization must be based on similar existing facilities and projection based on the
type of facility. The analysis must include a minimum of the following parameters and any other known and suspected contaminants
that are tributary to the system.
Arsenic
Molybdenum
Cadmium
Nickel
Chromium
Selenium
Copper
Zinc
Lead
Aluminum
Mercury
Ammonia -Nitrogen
Calcium
Phosphorus
Magnesium
Potassium
Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen
Sodium
%Total Solids
TKN
PH
Plant Available Nitrogen
(by calculation)
Weighted Averages
Combined Sources
Wastewater residuals shall not be applied to the land if the concentration of any pollutant in the residuals exceeds the ceiling
concentrations specified in the table below. Specify the pollutant concentration of these residuals (attach lab analysis):
Pollutant
Pollutant Ceiling Concentration (mg/kg)
Dry Weight Basis
Pollutant Concentration (mg/kg)
Dry Weight Basis
Arsenic
75
2.29
Cadmium
85
1.00
Chromium
3000
283.36
Copper
4300
296.38
Lead
840
74.01
Mercury
57
1.01
Molybdenum
75
26.09
Nickel
420
19.58
Selenium
100
2.14
Zinc
7500
200.47
(Reference Page lla of 18)
FORM: LARS 02/95
Page 3 of 18

f -f
LUMBERTON - WEIGHTED AVERAGES FOR BOTH SOURCES
CALCULATIONS WORK SHEET
(Pages 11-14 based on weighted average values)
This work sheet is designed to assist the Division of Environmental Management in reviewing this application as expeditiously as
possible. Its preparation in a complete and accurate manner is critical to this review. For permits that cover multiple sources of
residuals or different residuals from the same source, use additional work sheets.
A. List the specific residual that is covered by these calculations (place or process of origin)
What are the total dry tons of this residual to be land applied each year?
Total Dry Tons = Gallons of Residuals' % Solids " 8.34 Ibs✓gallon
oroduced annually 100
2,000 lbs./ton
Total Dry Tons = s _' 8.34 lbs./gallon
2,000 Ibs./ton
= 1, 000 Dry Tons per year
Distribution
1,500 DT/YR WWTP Residuals 79%
400 DT/YR WTP Residuals 21%
1,900 DT/YR Combined 100%
If the quantity of residual will vary significantly or if there will be a larger initial application, please attach a detailed
explanation and provide calculations for each variation.
B. Complete the following calculations to establish the portion of the residual that is made up of the various
parameters:
% Total Solids = 3.15 = (.79 X 3.32)+ (.21 X 2.49)
(PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL CONSTITUENTS ARE TO BE IN TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS)
PARAMETER
mg/L
+ % Solids (Decimal)
= mg/kg (dry wt.)
x 0.002
= lbs./dry ton
Arsenic
=
x 0.002
= 0.005
Cadmium
=
x 0.002
= 0.002
Chromium
=
x 0.002
= 0.567
Copper
=
x 0.002
= 0.593
Lead
=
x 0.002
= 0.148
Mercury
=
x 0.002
= 0.002
Molybdenum
=
x 0.002
= 0.052
Nickel
=
x 0.002
= 0.039
Selenium
=
x 0.002
= 0.004
Zinc
=
x 0.002
= 0.401
Ammonia=N
=
x 0.002
= 4.908
Calcium
=
x 0.002
= 38.868
Magnesium
=
x 0.002
= 5.866
NO3-NO2-N
=
x 0.002
= 0.020
Phosphorus
=
x 0.002
= 38.400
Potassium
=
x 0.002
= 7.794
Sodium
=
x 0.002
= 15.588
TKN
=
x 0.002
= 93.460
(See attached sheet)
l03NuTii1I:l 611al),4011
Page 11 of 18

CITY OF LUMBERTON W WTP AND WTP WEIGHTED AVERAGE CALCULATIONS
Parameters
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Zinc
Ammonia-N
Calcium
Magnesium
NO,NO,--N
Phosphorus
Potassium
Sodium
TKN
Parameters
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Zinc
Ammonia-N
Calcium
Magnesium
NO,NOo-N
Phosphorus
Potassium
Sodium
TKN
^'k-
Weighted Averages
Facility % Ave.
WWTP Source 79.0
WTP Source 21.0
WWTP WTP
Original lbs./dry ton
0.003
0.010
0.002
0.002
0.644
0.276
0.728
0.084
0.114
0.276
0.002
0.001
0.040
0.098
0.0401
0.036
0.0041
0.005
0.3981
0.412
6.000
0.800
45.000
15.800
7.000
1.600
0.020
0.020
46.800
6.800
9.600
1.000
19.200
2.000
113.200
19.200
iitr -, v .
0041 u.
1.610
4.850
1.000
1.000
322.000
138.000
364.000
42.000
57.000
138.000
1.140
0.530
20.000
49.000
20.0001
18.000
2.0901
2.320
199.0001
206.000
3,000.00
400.000
22,500.00
7,900.000
3,500.00
800.000
10.00
10.000
23,400.00
3,400.000
4,800.00
500.000
9,600.00
1,000.000
56,600.00
9,600.000
R001-168 R001-167
Jan-99 Jan-99
for Permit Modification Spring 99
WWTP WTP
Weighted lbs./dry ton
0.003
, 0.002
0.002
0.000
0.509
0.058
0.575
0.018
0.090
0.058
0.002
0.000
0.032
0.021
0.0321
0.008
0.003
0.001
0.314
0.087
4.740
0.168
35.550
3.318
5.530
0.336
0.016
0.004
36.972
1.428
7.584
0.210
15.168
0.420
89.4281
4.032
WWTP WTP WgtAve.
WgtAve WgtAve MG/KG
1.272
1.019
2.29
0.790
0.210
1.00
254.380
28.980
283.36
287.560
8.820
296.38
45.030
28.980
74.01
0.901
0.111
1.01
15.800
10.290
26.09
15.8001
3.780
19.58
1.651
0.487
2.14
157.2101
43.2601
200.47
2,370.00
84.00
2,454.00
17,775.00
1,659.00
19,434.00
2,765.00
168.00
2,933.00
7.90
2.10
10.00
18,486.00
714.00
19,200.00
3,792.00
105.00
3,897.00
7,584.00
210.00
7,794.00
44,714.00
2,016.00
46,730.00
Wgt. Ave.
Lbs/Dry Ton
0.005
0.002
0.567
0.593
0.148
0.002
0.052
0.039
0.004
0.401
4.908
38.868
5.866
0.020
38.400
7.794
15.588
93.460
Page lla of 18

LUMBERTON- WEIGHTED AVERAGES FOR BOTH SOURCES
C. Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) calculations and land application area requirements:
CONSTITUENTS
Mg/Kg-DRY WEIGHT
TKN
46,730
AMMONIA-N
2,454
NO3-NO2-N
<10
1. Mineralization Rate (MR) 30 %
(These values can be established for the specific residual or default values can be used for domestic wastewater treatment
residuals. If actual values are established, attach the documentation. The default values are as follows):
Unstabilized Primary and Secondary Residuals 40%
- Aerobically Digested Residuals 30%
Anaerobically Digested Residuals 20%
Composted Residuals 10%
(If the default values are used, attach an explanation as to why the specific chosen default value is appropriate.)
2. Complete the following calculations for the application method proposed (Please note, the Mineralization
Rate [MR] should be utilized in the following calculations as a decimal):
PAN for Surface Application
I
PAN = [(MR) X (TKN - NH3)] + .5 X (NH,) + (NO,-NO2-N)
PAN = [ .30 X ( 46,730 - 2,454 )] +.SX ( 2,454 )+ 10
-- PAN = 14,520 PPM DryWeight
PAN for Subsurface Application
PAN = [(MR) X (TKN - NH,)] + (NHr) + (NOi NOi N )
PAN = [ .30 X ( 46,730 - 2,454 )] + ( 2,454 ) + 10
PAN = 16,483 PPM Dry Weight
3. Total PAN to be land applied per year
Total dry tons of residual to be land applied per year:
Total PAN in pounds = (PAN in me/kg Dry Weight) X 2000 Pounds / Ton 14,520 X 2,000
per dry ton 1,000,000 1,000,000
_ _ (PAN in PPM Dry Weight) X 0.002
= 29.04 Pounds/Dry Ton/Year (Surface applied)
Total PAN in pounds = (PAN in Pounds / Dry Ton) X Total tons of residual to be land applied
29.04 X 1,900
= 55,176 Pounds/Year
Due to the fact that organic nitrogen is mineralized slowly over time, the amount of nitrogen that comes available in years
following the initial application must be taken into consideration when calculating application rates for the subsequent
years. This being the case, please attach an evaluation of this factor and its impact on loading rates. Show the adjusted PAN
for at least five years (5yr. PAN + current PAN x 1,900 DT/Year) (17.28 + 29.04) X 1,900 DT/YR =
The maximum adjusted annual PAN is 88,008 Pounds/Year. (See Attached Sheet)
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 12 of 18

S&ME, Inc.
Greensboro, North Carolina
RESIDUAL PAN CALCULATION
Lumberton (Permit Modification Spring '99)
weighted average both sources
TKN= 46,730 mg/kg
NH3= 2,454 mg/kg
NO3-NO2-N= 10 mg/kg
Min Rate= 0.30
PAN= [min.rate (TKN - NH3) + 0.5 (NH3) + NO3-NO2] * 0.002
0.30 44,276 1,227 10.00
PAN= 29.04 LBS/DT
Calculate residual nitrogen for years 2,3,4 and 5 following the initial application to determine
the amount of PAN/DT remaining.
2ND YEAR RESIDUAL PAN
PAN= [min.rate (1st year org. - N 2nd year min. - N] * 0.002
0.15 44,276 13,283
PAN= 9.30 LBS/DT remaining from 1st year application
" 3RD YEAR RESIDUAL PAN
PAN= [min.rate (2nd year org. - N 3rd year min. - N] * 0.002
0.08 30,993 4,649
PAN= 4.22 LBS/DT remaining from 1st year application
4TH YEAR RESIDUAL PAN
PAN= [min.rate (3rd year org. - N 4th year min. - N] * 0.002
0.05 26,344 2,108
PAN= 2.42 LBS/DT remaining from 1st year application
5TH YEAR RESIDUAL PAN
PAN= [min.rate (4th year org. - N 5th year min. - N] * 0.002
0.03 24,237 1,212
PAN= 1.34 LBS/DT remaining from Istyear application
Residual PAN from years 2 thru 5 after the initial application = 17.28 Lbs/Pan/DT

LUMBERTON= WEIGHTED AVERAGES FOR BOTH SOURCES
4. Crop information on nitrogen uptake per year
Crop(s)
Alfalfa
Bermuda Grass (Hay, Pasture)
Blue Grass
Corn (Grain)
Corn (Silage)
Cotton
Fescue
Forest (Hardwood & Softwood)
Milo
Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Oats)
Sorghum, Sudex (Pasture) -
Sorghum, Sudex (Silage)
Soybeans
Timothy, Orchard, & Rye Grass
Coastal Bermuda
(Division Recommendations)
PAN (Ibs./acre/year)
200
220
120
160
200
70
250
75
100
100
180
220
200
200
350
(Provide for the Crops Specified)
PAN (Ibs./acre/year)
200
220
120
160
200
Please provide the basis for the uptake rates used if different than Division Recommendation:
5. Total acres needed to land apply the pounds of available nitrogen calculated above
Total acres needed = Maximum total pounds of plant available nitrogen (PAN)
Pounds of nitrogen needed for crop*
88,008 - 100
70
250
75
100
100
180
220
200
200
Minimum acres needed based on most restrictive PAN = 880 acres
* This value must be the value for the crop to be grown that has the lowest nitrogen uptake rate per acre.
If there are various crops that will only be utilized for certain sites, please attach the calculations for each site and determine
the total needed acres using the format outlined below.
D. Calculate the Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
(** This section must be completed in mg/l, to convert: mg/kg X % solids [as a decimal] = mg/1 **)
SAR =Na Milli Equivalent _ [0.5 (Ca Milli Equivalent + Mg Milli Equivalent)]"
CONCENTRATION (mg/1) _ Equivalent Weight = Milli Equivalents of Ion
SODIUM (Na)
245.511
(mg/1)
CALCIUM (Ca)
612.171
(mg/1) r
MAGNESIUM(Mg)
92.389
(mg/1)
SAR = 2.439
23
= 10.674
20
= 30.609
12
= 7.699
FORM: LARS 02/95
Page 13 of 18

SAR
Page 1

LUMBERTON — WEIGHTED AVERAGES FOR BOTH SOURCES
If calculation sheets are being completed for more than one residual or site, please attach a
summary sheet that brings the results of all the calculations sheets to one point.
E. Determine the Site Life for this land application site:
The lifetime pollutant loadings shall not be exceeded. The site life is determined by calculating the number of years that the site
can receive the residual without exceeding the lifetime pollutant loadings. The site life calculations will be based on the most
restrictive crop plant available nitrogen (PAN) requirement specified and the maximum dry tons or residuals to be land applied
annually. Therefore, in the table below the Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year will be calculated as:
1. Most restrictive crop based on the plant available nitrogen (PAN) requirement: small grains
Associated plant available nitrogen (PAN) requirement: 100 (lbsJacre/year)
2. Minimum acres needed based on most restrictive PAN (as found in C.5 above): 880 acres
3. Dry Tons of Residuals to be land applied per year: 1,900 dry tons per year
4. Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year = Dry Tons/Year of Residuals to be land aoolied
Minimum number of acres required for land application
i
Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year = 2.16
If any of the application sites are to be loaded at greater than the rate specified above, please specify the loading rate and explain:
Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year (different from above) _
Explanation:
In the table below, the highest annual loading (Tons of Residuals to be Applied/Acre/Year) specified above, will be multiplied
by the lbs./dry ton of each pollutant as found in B above. The Site Life can then be determined by:
Site Life (Years) = Allowable Lifetime Loadings (lbsJacre)
Projected Pounds to be Applied/Acre/Year
Pollutant
Tons of
Residuals to be
Applied per
Acre per Year
lbsJdry ton of each
pollutant
(as found in Part B
above)
Projected
Pounds to be
Applied/Acre
Near
Allowable Lifetime
Pollutant Loadings
(lbs./acre)
Site Life
(Years)
Arsenic
2.16 *
0.005 =
0.0105
36
= 3,428
Cadmium
2.16 *
0.002 =
0.0043
34
= 7,870.
Chromium
2.16 *
0.567 =
1.2247
2,677
= 2,185
Copper
2.16 *
0.593 =
1.28.08
1,338
= 1,044
Lead
2.16 *
0.148 =
0.3197
267
= 835
Mercury
2.16 *
0.002 =
0.0043
15
= 3,488
Nickel
2.16 *
0.039 =
0.0842
374
= 4,441
Selenium
2.16 *
0.004 =
0.0086
89
= 10,348
Zinc
2.16 *
0.401 =
0.8662
1 2,498
1 = 2,883
Compare the nine (9) pollutants above and determine which pollutant will result in the shortest hte for this site.
The Limiting Pollutant is
i The Site Life is 835 years.
!
Lead
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 14 of 18

SECTION V
LISTING OF SITES PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED (Table 1)
AND
-- LIST OF SITES PROPOSED FOR INCLUSION (Table 2)

TABLE 1
-- PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED SITES REQUESTED TO BE RETAINED
CITY OF LUM 3ERTON LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
PERMIT #W00000672*
I�
Application Area [acres]
Site No.
Owner/Lessee
(excluding buffers)
Robeson County
HB-1
Jennings Hayes
18.52
HB-2
Jennings Hayes
12.69
HB-3
Jennings Hayes
11.72
HB-4
Jennings Hayes
10.62
HB-5
Jennings Hayes
6.87
HB-6
Jennings Hayes
26.21
HB-7
Jennings Hayes
21.44
HB-8
Jennings Hayes
10.57
HB-9
Jennings Hayes
13.49
HB-10
Jennings Hayes
16.70
HB-11
Jennings Hayes
13.13
HB-12
Jennings Hayes
28.54
HB-13
Jennings Hayes
21.25
BB-14
Jennings Hayes
10.66
HB-15
Jennings Hayes
18.53
HB-16
Jennings Hayes
30.31
BB-17
Jennings Hayes
1435
BB-18
Jennings Hayes
20.33
HB-19
Jennings Hayes
10.50
BB-20
Jennings Hayes
105.77
HB-21
Jennings Hayes
24.00
HB-22
Jennings Hayes
49.54
HB-23
Jennings Hayes
23.55
subtotal 519.29
CDM-1
James V. Lamb
17.75
CDM-2
James V. Lamb
51.40
CDM-3
James V. Lamb
35.35
subtotal 104.5
10-3
Lycurous Lowry
15.0
10-5
Lycurous Lowry
64.30
10-22
Lycurous Lowry
15.93
LL-1
Lycurous Lowry
93.77
subtotal 189.0
13-4
A.R. Lowry
15.09
13-7
A.R. Lowry
31.0
RL-1
A.R. Lowry
16.00
RL-2
A.R. Lowry
23.88
RL-3
A.R. Lowry
11.28
Y
I

TABLE I (Continued)
- • PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED SITES REQUESTED TO BE RETAINED
_ CITY OF LUMBERTON LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
PERMIT #W00000672*
Application Area [acres]
Site No.
Owner/Lessee
(excluding buffers)
RL-5
A.R. Lowry
26.1
subtotal 123:35
14-1
George Lowry
7.43
.14-2
George Lowry
16.06
subtotal 23:49
16-1A
Theodore Lowry / A.R. Lowry
9.25
16-1B
Theodore Lowry / A.R. Lowry
10.31
subtotal 19.56
11-16
J.T. Campen / Ozell Baker
8.16
1147
J.T. Campen / Ozell Baker
4.93
11-18 r
J.T. Campen / Ozell Baker
17.06
11-19
J.T. Campen / Ozell Baker,
2.3
subtotal '32.45
21-1
Hartley Oxendine / Lacy Cummings'
22.0
21-2A
Hartley Oxendine / Lacy Cummings
26.0
21-213
Hartley Oxendine / Lacy Cummings
5.5
21-3
Hartley Oxendine / Lacy Cummings
6.5
21-4
Hartley Oxendine / Lacy Cummings
14.0
HO-5
Hartley Oxendine / Lacy Cummings
51.55
subtotal 125.55
22-1
K.M. Biggs /'J.P. Prevatte
11.7
22-3 7
K.M Biggs / J.P. Prevatte
19.7
subtotal 31.4
17-1
City of Lumberton /Delois Allen
35.4
17-2
City of Lumberton / Delois Allen
23.42
17-4
City of Lumberton / Delois Allen
51.22
17-5
City of Lumberton / Delois Allen
37.29
subtotal 147.33
LW-1
Lennis Watts
19.2
LW-2
Lennis Watts
7.0
LW-3A
Lennis Watts
21.7
LW-3B
Lennis Watts
24.0
LW-4
Lennis Watts
20.6
LW-5
Lennis Watts
29.0
subtotal 121.5

TABLE I (Continued)
PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED SITES REQUESTED TO BE RETAINED
CITY OF LUMBERTON LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
PERMIT #W00000672*
Application Area [acres]
Site No.
Owner/Lessee
(excluding buffers)
KMB-1
K.M. Biggs / Chris McLean
18.52
KMB-2
K.M. Biggs / Chris McLean
14.44
KMB-6
K.M. Biggs / Chris McLean
32.42
KMB-7
K.M. Biggs / Chris McLean
30.63
subtotal 96.01
JBP-2
K.M. Biggs
44.1
subtotal 44.1
CM-1
David McLean / Chris McLean
19.5
CM2
David McLean / Chris McLean
61.63
subtotal 81.13
JL-1
Edwin Taylor / Gerald W. Lee
20.2
subtotal 20.2
TOTAL ACRES IN ROBESON COUNTY 1,678.86
Columbus County
PW-1
Paul Willoughby, Jr.
11.4
PW-2
Paul Willoughby, Jr.
9.3
PW-3
Paul Willoughby, Jr.
16.2
PW4
Paul Willoughby, Jr.
12.3
PW-5
Paul Willoughby, Jr:
7.6
PW-6
Paul Willoughby, Jr.
11.1
PW-7
Paul Willoughby, Jr.
8.2
subtotal 76.1
FF-1
Curtis Fields / Willie Fields
14.5
WF-1
Steve Walters / Willie Fields
13.9
WF-2
Steve Walters / Willie Fields
8.5
subtotal 22.4
LH-1
Larry Hinson
25.4
LH-2
Larry Hinson
7.4
LH-4
Larry Hinson
5.7
LH-5
Larry Hinson
12.2
subtotal 50.7
TOTAL ACRES IN COLUMBUS COUNTY 163.7
TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE IN PROGRAM 1,842.56
Excerpted from the Permit No. W00000627.dated April 4, 1997 and modified to exclude the acreage proposed for
deletion in this modification application.

TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF SITES PROPOSED FOR INCLUSION INTO PERMIT
CITY OF LUMBERTON — LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
PERMIT NO. WQ0000672
Robeson County
Farmers
Site No.
No. Fields
Gross Acres
Net Acres
H.M. King
23
8
151.2
131.7
Dan Odom
24
4
53.1
47.9
Angus McCormick
25
5
93.2
83.2
J.M. Smith, Jr.
26
6
151.8
136.6
Gerald Lee
Field JL-2
1
7.9
3.9
7-1
TOTAL
24
457.2
403.3
0

IIINTON McCALL HING FARM - SITE 23
SOIL SCIENTIST / AGRONOMIST REPORT
Soil Scientist / Agronomist
SOSc���
�f 0
�9� 1 U98
�FNORV

HINTON McCALL ICING FARM - SITE 23
The Hinton McCall King consists of 8 fields located at 3 sites within Robeson County, North
Carolina. Fields 1, 2, 3, and 5 are located approximately 5 miles southeast of St. Pauls, at Latitude
34' 45' 12" N and Longitude 79° 53' 40" W. Fields 6 and 7 are located approximately 2.5 miles
southeast of St. Pauls at Latitude 34' 47' 12" N and Longitude 79' 50' 40". Fields 8 and 9 are
located 3 miles west of St. Pauls and are centered at or near Latitude 34' 48' 43" and Longitude 79'
02' 15". The 8 fields contain a total of 151.2 (131.7 net) acres and are proposed as land application
sites. The areas surrounding the 8 proposed fields are predominantly rural and sparsely populated.
A field investigation was conducted by an S&ME soil scientist/agronomist on each of the proposed
fields
Fields 1 — 5
Fields 1, 2, 3, and 5 have a total of 76.8 (68.4 net) acres. Fields 1, 2, and 5 are used for pasture and
are currently established with coastal bermuda. Field 3 is used for row crops and as winter pasture.
The fields are primarily flat to gently sloping towards adjacent tributaries, which drain to the south.
According to the soil scientist evaluation and the information in the Robeson County Soil Survey
obtained from the Natural Resource Conservation Service (Lumberton Field Office), soils in fields
1 through 5 are classified as the Faceville, Norfolk, and Wagram Series, with slopes ranging from 0
to 6 percent. These series are well suited to year around applications of residual solids.
Fields 6 and 7
Fields 6 and 7 have a total of 44.7 (35.1 net) acres and are used for coastal hay production. The
fields are nearly flat to gently sloping towards adjacent surface drainage features south of the fields.
The soil scientist evaluation and the Robeson County Soil Survey data indicate that Fields 6 and 7
consist of soils in the Lakeland, Norfolk, and Wagram Series with slopes ranging from 0-4 percent.
These series are well suited to year around land application of residual solids.

Fields 8 and 9
Fields'8 and 9 have a total of 29.7 (28.2 net) acres. These fields are established in coastal bermuda
for hay. The topography of these fields is flat to gently sloping, towards adjacent surface drainage
features, to the north and east. The fields contain soils in the Goldston, Pocalla, Wagram, and
Wakulla Series and are ,well suited to the year around land application of residual solids. Fields 8
and 9 are typified by a 0 2 percent slope.
Fields 1- 9 '
Both the soils and the crops should be able to assimilate the proposed loadings of liquids, solids,
nitrogen, phosphorus, heavy metals, and salts known to be in the residual. This assessment is
based on the residual analysis provided, the planned application rate, proper crop management
guidelines and adherence to permit requirements. Soil pH should be maintained above 6.0 and at
levels to ensure optimal crop production. Nitrogen is considered the most limiting characteristic
of these residuals, however soil tests should be reviewed annually to identify any changes in the
nutrient status of the soil
Crop rotations and management practices should be evaluated prior, to each application to
- account for changes in the proposed crop rotation and land use objectives. Crop management
guidelines that will be of importance for this site will be:
• timing of application events with'plant nutritional needs and periods of plant dormancy,
• split applications to prevent hydraulic overloading or nutrient leaching,
performance of proper stabilization methods to fit crop and soil needs,
• establishment of suitable vegetative cover for currently forested agricultural sites,
• incorporation or injection of residual solids on fields that have a high incidence and
proper timing of flooding,
• maintenance of proper vegetative cover on more sloping areas with runoff potential, and
• proper coordination between application events and crop harvesting.

The results of soil analysis for these fields (Fields 1 — 9) indicate no gross deficiencies in the
fertility of these fields. By using standard agricultural practices for the management of forage and
crop production, the operator should see significant benefits from the land application of residual
solids. In turn, these well- maintained fields should provide good assimilation of the plant available
nutrients contained in the residuals and afford an environmentally safe means of residual solids
disposal and nutrient recycling.
For each of the 8 fields proposed, an investigation was conducted by an S&ME agronomist/soil
scientist. On -site observation confirms the information obtained from the soil survey of Robeson
County. Applicable- acres on these fields consist predominantly of the Faceville, Goldsboro,
Lakeland, Norfolk, Pocalla, Wagram, and Wakulla Series.
9

S&ME, INC.
FIELD INVESTIGATION SHEET
PROJECT:
FARM / SITE NO.:
FIELD NO.:
Z
NO.: L
SOILS INFORMATION
SOH. PROFH.E DESCRIPTION
HORIZON
I DEPTH
TEXTURE
STRUCTURE
MATRIX
COLOR
MOTTLES
COLOR
AP
0_7��
E_
%" /8
05-
Zmz TIAI—�
Bt
/8-38
5CL
5 ''
Dye 516
3,6— 52Y.
5C 11gl
Legend: s - sand
Is - loamy sand
sl - sandy loam
scl - sandy clay loam
' c - clay
-61 - clay learn
Depth Of Seasonal High Water Table:
Depth Of Apparent Water Table:
—'Depth Type Of Restrictive Zone:
Type Of Crop:
Comments:
r�
Most Similar Series:
Described By:
sil - silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
g - granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk -strong subangular blocky
> S2',
> $2„
1(14
GENERAL INFORMATION
WIVAM
PB )11,L(C.w, L,S.5. Date: qT

j I S&ME, INC.
— FIELD INVESTIGATION SHEET
PROJECT:
FARM / SITE NO.• KEN! 1 S/TZ'
FIELD NO.: BORING NO.:
SOILS INFORMATION
SOIL PROFILE' DESCRIPTION
HORIZON
DEPTH
TEXTURE
STRUCTURE-
MATRIX
COLOR
MOTTLES
COLOR
A-
g�-
87'1
26)-3o
580e
iayzG �
B4z
o —5a{
�cL
s
7-she W G
;Legend: s - sand
Is - loamy sand
at - sandy loam
scl - sandy clay loam
c - clay
cl - clay loam
sil - silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
g . - granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangularblocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky
Depth Of Seasonal High Water Table: i52-
I Depth Of Apparent Water Table: > > 'Z
Depth Type Of Restrictive Zone: AIA
1
GENERAL: INFORMATION
Type Of Crop: Lu�af ,SEX
Comments:
Most Similar Series:
Described By:
hl,Fz/ .Suir-Eo YOLI74 ;&,,✓,o iPovcA77en/
/li )"z =JC L I
/SOB 4Y/G LCa)e
Date: 4/4199

S&ME, INC.
FIELD INVESTIGATION SHEET
PROJECT:
FARM / SITE NO.:
FIELD NO.:
Qo BORING NO.: '
SOILS INFORMATION,
SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTION
HORIZON
DEPTH
TEXTURE
STRUCTURE
MATRIX
COLOR
MOTTLES
COLOR
�-
-/Z
ay�y
o�z
/0�25/�
r
Legend: s - sand
- - Is - loamy sand
_ sl - sandy loam
scl — sandy clay loam
c - clay
cl - -clay loam
sil - silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
g - granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangulaz blocky
Depth Of Seasonal High Water Table:
-Depth Of Apparent Water Table: 5� "
Depth Type Of Restrictive Zone: JU/R
GENERAL INFORMATION
;Type Of Crop:
Comments: Su /rPQ /�.e //GAir '�ou.✓o A0,01-le'47701V
Most Similar Series:
Described By:
L
Ate' ; G
Date:

fi
PROJECT;
FARM / SITE NO.:
FIELD NO.:
S&ME, INC.
FIELD_ INVESTIGATION SHEET
// BORING NO: ' I
SOILS INFORMATION
SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTION
HORIZON
DEPM
TEXTURE
STRUCTURE
MATRIX
COLOR
MOTTLES
COLOR
(,I2 Y z
C,
—w
S
/aYiz V
zo - q0
C
yv -saf
S
C
40--
Legend: s -
sand
Is,-
loamy sand
sl -
sandy loam
scl -
sandy clay loam
c -
clay
cl -
clay loam
Depth Of Seasonal High Water Table:
Depth Of Apparent Water Table:
Depth Type Of Restrictive Zone:
Type Of Crop:
Comments:
r
Most Similar Series:
A - silt loam
sicl - .silty clay loam
g - granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky
>SZ/.
>.S2"
Nz
GENERAL INFORMATION
/Fig Suir�n F� C/EA.P_ .Peua,0 .�9PP41,-A774IV
NAkII /a
Described By: ;id8 i/ 1a etjY-. L. S. S . Date:

IN Carolina Division of Environmental Management
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
TOPRIVATELANDS
Permitte--: 67Y eo- ZZnvS�S
enjgg7
Contact Person: tiDcdil2n� /Ge
Address of Permittee: iye( BDX /3cg
Lawr,bez�r, 7 XsC. z8� nn /'�
List of wastewater residuals to be applied to these lands: _ _ /Ci°6i a� �o�/ei%5 gQYn `d�L+e
Site ID Number: S/TGC .2
Field Number: GielA /-17
Location of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site):
Owner of Property used for residual application:
i
Lessee of Property (if appropriate):
it n/I. _ it
Land use or cropping patterns: �4651i�� /JCa y a'eme 20W o%o
I �
Intended use or disposition of crops:
-- • • t f • r • ,t r • r t r ♦ • • • i ♦ r • • r + • t t • ♦ • t f • • t r • • t • ,e a a t •
I
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits 7�
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location shown as
described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The landowner or his representative
receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permittee receives, in
consideration, the use of the land described above for the disposal of wastewater residuals. This agreement shall remain
in effect for the length of the Division of Environmental Management land application permit and shall be renewed each
time the land application permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to
abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in
advance, modifies or cancels this Land owner's A-greement.
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29 53 5
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
FORM: LARS 02195 Page 13 of 13

STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and State Otfcials or
their representatives to inspect each parcel of property prior to, during, and after residual
application and to establish monitoring facilities on or near the application site as required by the
residual land application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their
representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, and
twelve (12) months after termination of, this Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application
permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resouces
(NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management (DEM) for the land described above prior
to commencement of residual application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum
application rates, limitations and other restrictions,prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with information and data
concerning the program for land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes
an analysis of constituents of the residual, residual application methods and schedules for typical
cropping patterns and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee for residual application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each
soil analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application.
Residuals may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a sufficient amount of lime is
j also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime, residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
t_
7. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to
the intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the
Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the
limits of the NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will
determine residual application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the results of soil
samples.
8. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the
permit.
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement
for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public
access to the land application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period
following residual application. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted at each site.
It. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee
or Land Owner (Lessee) prior to and during application.
FORM: LARS 02195 Page 16 of 13

12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third
party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the
terms and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the,site agrees, by execution of this agreement, to comply with all
provisions of this Agreement.
14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto
with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a thirty (30) day period following
the residual application. Application sites that are to be use for grazing shall have fencing that will
be used to prevent access during these periods after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of land to a new owner, a permit modification must be requested and obtained
from the Division of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and
agreements. In addition, a notice shall be given by the current landowner to the new landowner
that gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at each site.
17. Any duty authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or
place on or related to the application site and facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of
determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under
the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or
leachate.
18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with
another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement.
The land application of any additional wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals
specified by this permit, is prohibited.
* * * i * * * *� �/%** i * * * * * *�/* * * * * *
Land Owner: /44ewz eih
Address: 631 'eln KOaet�
Z5zg mil
Phone No.: e910) :522S J
FORM: LARS 02l95
Operator:
Address:
Phone No.:
Page 17 of IS

I
I, 11m4a 1illid, / KING have read this land owner's agreement and do
hereby grant permission to the Permitta to apply sludge/residual to my lands as specified herein.
Land Owner
//�� Date
NORTH CAROLINA, C yU/1..46AW COUNTY,
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that ///wmy /%fie LACL ,L-iNd
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of AkeC,4 2¢ 19�_
14&4,4 �2-1. 110,, �.
NOTARY PUBLIC /
My commission expires 2002
SEAL: ROBERT P WILLCOX JR
NOTARY PUBLIC GUILFORD COUNTY NC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
06-03.2002
••• s••• s s s r s s• r r s s s s a s• s r s s a s s s s s s s s s s r s r s s s s s
I have read this land owner's agreement and do
hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee
Date
� s s s► s» s a s a s a s s ss » r» s s s s i r■ s s»•»» s s» s s r s»» s» r r»
I, � ,Todd PO W p 11 have read this�er's a emen hereby agree to
abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
�4�
Date
FORM: LARS 02195 Page 18 of 18

FIELDS
IYm
/. . _ /'• � •Ion /
/�
,IIRfON °% FIELDS 6-7 1
\� \ �'• �" - 1 ) YID 1 T i �' )
� \ PI IZ9 l i / 19e9 � 196J 19rze
® /" f1.INAf /' / •i•-.� � lY]I 'U .Y`r- =e]. _ '�'iow \ .
i_. > 1%1•
]
^
aaan Now -
FIELDS
\
8-9 =^ 9
,.In _
Iwl
1 1 y L 7S,
19m .
A
rim _ T
IA• 'T' J� IXG' / 1
'w..� •Ir \ Ine nz iii== � — _ 1 V / I\��` / `� 1 l
I Oei •Y
O
t.i. / •� I 1 • (� / a 1 I J� \. ® \�'�� 1 - - /�'\' LUMBBE
39
SCALE l'-�2mL srm Ni" FIGURE NO.
'/ I'—°• I 3 .1 CHECKED BY: �-/'�'li g Hinton McCall Kin .Farm
DRAWN BY: SDB *S&MESite 23 I
-
/� A).oao /• 1 I �- DATE: JOB NO.
Apr-99 ENNRONMENIAL 5[RVICES • EN4�uE[RING •TESTING 1888-93-004 City of Lumbedon

N
1925)
Hol
es P'ond\\
Bay `\ ` . i
�.\•• o'.. \.�1,g_'� _
—.,... `
.. �
1006
29
aSch..
I• 1
\
-.\�
FIELD - 3,
J�
_1005
10 17 so
z�-
_'{
FIELD - 2 -
r '
-
cem
.
`
FIELD -1
I
sza
BM 133
95
125
NC; CONTOUR INTERVAL = 5' t.
.' USGS TOPO QUAD - ST. PAULS, —
SCALE F. =z.000
*t-
INNHUNNINIAL SEHNCtS • tN4NLlMNC • IE] IINC
City of Lumberton
McCall King Farm - Site 23
Land Application Program
TOPO
MAP
Fig.2
CHECKED BV: wHinton
DRAWN BY: SDS&ME
DATE My_gg
doe No. 1588-93-004 City of Lumberton

N'
ram' i :��� �.\-� • ;.`.�� r j � 1 1'� � ,.
• Ise �• ,I 'v -�:s L.S � , j„ <
• r,. I
:.
-14 -
14
Al
i FIELD - 7
T
FIELD 6
�#.,/ - >
�\�� ✓ C —!"- - _ �'�`',�-_ Sly
��-
BM
p ; \I \11 j` '\ � f -\\ 1 �\ (�o es Pond\\ 1\
• -- , \\ v \ Bay
19031
ti' \
157
34S
/ L_ USGS TOPO QUAD - ST. PAULS, NC; CONTOUR INTT
ERVAL = 5' I /
SCALE i"=2.Boo'
--;= S&ME
ENNHbNNLN1AL SENNCLS • W[iNEEKING iE511N4
City of Lumberton
Hinton McCall King Farm - Site 23
Land Application Pro ram
TOPO
MAP
Fig.2A
CHECKED BY: 99w
DRAWN BY: Soo
DATE \Iu-99
JOB No. 1588-93-004 City of Lumberton

..� FIELD - 9A��f��=-.�4-
\�^ FIELD - 8
_ „•1--- .',1 -``'^ I ..� �,\� - - � a
�V�, ;:-�� •_-=_� � -
�. ;;62 -- -_
— USGS TOPO QUAD - RENNERT, NC; CONTOUR INTERVAL = 51 / ^
SCALE. r=1.2/.0o0'
S&ME
ENNNONMEN1AL ) HVICfi • LNUNLFMNC • lE]LN4
City of Lumberton
Hinton McCall King Farm -Site 23
Land - Application Pro ram
TOPO
MAP
Fig.2B
CHECKED BY:
DRAWNBY. Son DB
DATE. MU-99
JOB NO. 1588-93-004 City of Lumberton

N
jfin+v
I�>r ro rx rlt-
j10
�73+/ r J@�•..^�
w ... Yiii�' '^'��22• . t r f 3y � i
'�..' ��d�s Y '•C�'y 1\'��Ah yr ♦ " ���yf
iX" if L =�► 9
r
FIELD 5 �< d� • 6
�fqt www1Ar` .e:S,.jr' .. i r 147
1ti.�C•�:� � '4 ,e'1
If
4
sw�`c I� Lx . FIELD - 3 y�
31
PC, 4o w3 'rr`��', \ •:
e \� g0s,w
tf 3 FIELD 2
f�kTt r� 4' IP d
FIELDAIR
"Yip •.IY V-: •- 'd'3.{t,' -.rF �le+�,�.♦ `:N.
771
•ry�� N�" {�U- •y�f+�.yr,+5<7
��4'T•f1
SCALE. V', 66D' - City of Lumberton
CHECKED By ePnl *S&ME
Hinton McCall King Farm - Site 23 FSA
DRAWN BY SDs LandApplication program MAP
DATE %IU-99 JOB NO. 1588-93-004 City of Lumberton Fig. 3

:-,7777 ;777,
XI:
Z"o
0

0-13
21
FIELD - 9 4
too
FIELD - 8
AA:;
p
xa
-1
Li
16
LQ
t
r
Ali -,-W-
;Q�
%sl LPN,
I vv*
ZT.
3
q7-1 1
87.1 q ;.qs
T a Pp
SCALE: 1" 660' City of Lumberton
CHECKED Sr. 7ePI. l ���� Hinton McCall King Farm - Site 23 FSA
DRAWN BY. S11B MAP
DATE: Land Application program
Mar-99 JOB NO. 1588-93-004 City of Lumberton Fig. 3BI

N
BY
r•-2.000' City of Lumberton
pW Hinton McCall King Farm -Site 23
soe Land Application Program
NRCS
MAP

SR 1929
OUT
OUT
/
FIELD - 5
1
�
VA
%
�+ ACCESS
■� ..
A-
� i �
\
Yet \�
-r
•
ACCESS
may/ _�.
FIELD - 3 t
w
ACCESS
W
Y
�Y
K
\V
FIELD - 2
WOODS
FIELD -1
ACCESS
OUT
1
j
l
SR 1927
r
I
rOND I
a
WOOD
SR 1928
Legend
■ Duelling M'IA Wooded Area
A Structure (Bam) _._.♦ Drainage—y
d Pond Access Road
Well — — — Property line
/X/P Buffer Arcs K-K-K Fence
W 'Wet Area 0 hand Auger Boring
SCALE. V=660' City of Lumberton
CHECKED BY. RpwI Hinto
n on McCall King Farm - Site 23 BUFFER
DRAWN BY SDB .;,-� SUNME Land Application Program MAP
DATET1ar-99 LNNMUNVM I=.: �INNCI": I•�.INLLMN� ILSTIN:. JOB NO. 1585-93-004 City Of Lumberton Fig. 5,

NC HWY 20'- 0.4 MILES
C
IWOODS
•a
/
ROW CROP
ROW CROP
A
ACCESS
FIELD - 7
•
ROW CROP
•
�•
FIELD - 6 `` nccPss
,C
4
y
A-
ROW CROP
\
•
\
WOODS
`.
SR 1924
I
Legend
■
Dwelling - MiA Wooded Arm
♦
swcsrm (Barn) —•--♦ Drama e y
•
Q
Pond Accew Road
•
Well --- Property line
///////
Bu9-er Area x-x-x Fence
W
We Arm @ Hand Auger Boring
SCALE: 1^=eco�
Sara
City of Lumberton
Hinton McCall King Farm -Site 23
BUFFER
CHECKED
: B
DRAWN BY: SDB
Land Application Program
MAP^�
.
CNNNnNNINIAL YNNLi] • fNUnELMNG IE)TN4
Fig. sA
DATF Mar-99
Joe NO.
1588-93.004 City of Lumberton

n_
WOODS +'
ii
I �
P��O!
I
IOVERGROWNAREA
/ROW yN FIELD - 8
ROW CROPS • 1 •
A A 4`
� �l
WOODS •
_i Y
ACCESS
Is
�i
j ACCESS
SR 1006 I
SR 1784
Legend
■
ing /v',n wooded a
Dwelling
A,
Strum, a (Bam) -•--♦ Dninageway
d
=
Pond Aecscw Road
Well --- Property Line
///////
Buffer Area x-x-x Fence
W
Wet Area @ Hand Auger Boring
scALe I^=deo'
sm
City of Lumberton
Hinton McCall King Farm - Site 23
BUFFER
CHECKED BY
Land Application Program
M"
DRAWN BY' SDB
LNNRQN LNIAL XRMLLS - LKQNXLMNG • ItSPNC
Fig. J B
DATE. Mar-99
aaB No. 159&93-004 City of Lumberton

HINTON McCALL KING FARM - Site No. 23
FIELD DATA SHEET
City of Lumberton
S&ME Inc. Project No. 1588-93-004
FIELD NO.
GROSS Ac
NET Ac
SOIL SERIES
CROP
1
5.5
5.4
Norfolk, Wagram
Coastal Hay
2
12.9
12.3
Norfolk, Wagram
Coastal Pasture
3
32.5
28.5
Faceville, Norfolk
Row Crop
5
25.9
22.2
Faceville, Norfolk, Wagram
Coastal Pasture
6
34.4
24.9
Lakeland, Norfolk, Wagram
Coastal Hay
7
10.3
10.2
Lakeland, Norfolk
Coastal Hay
8
10.7
10.7
Wakulla
Coastal Hay
9
19
17.5
Goldsboro, Pocalla,
f Wagram, Wakulla
Coastal Hay
TOTAL
151.2
131.7
Map Symbol
Soil Series
FaB
Faceville
GoA
Goldsboro
LaB
Lakeland
NoA
Norfolk
PoB
Pocalla
WaB
Wagram
WkB
Wakulla
1

fir.n=undo rdl GbrM'817 -�a,io... ..•"` ?RX N0. 338288888u "5'. 02
This form most be completed by the appropriate Regional Oita and included with the
submission of the application package.
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
In order to determine the classification of the watershed in which these land application activities will be
located; you are required to submit this form, with items 1 through 8 completed, to the appropriate Division of
Envirorumeatal Management Regional Water Quality Supervisor (see attached listing). At a minimum, you must
include an 8.5" by I V cog of the portion of a 7.5 minum USGS Topographic Map whieh'shows the subject
surface waters. You must identify the location of the facility and the closest downslope surface waters (waters for
which you are requesting the classification) m
cation) on the submitted map copy. The application may not be
submitted until As form is completed and included with the submittal.
1. Applicant (please specify the name of the municipality, corporation, individual, or other):
Cat OR, G&^Lollamy
2. Name and Complete Address of Applicant: Cif 4r &SfiapAt
D.O. Boer " / m —
City: ZU40
Telephone Nut
3. Project Name:
4, Volume of residuals to be lord applied: i 7-00 dry tens pa year
5. Name of closest surface waters: &A'40• Tt�,b s •I.+ Tek NA.Ir . Swemma
6. County(s) where lend application site is located: ._._..Ak.-A +n
7. Map name and data: S9 —A&A W kmiLwlri WAP &za& �
8. Applicant Signature: aeA.,m"
TOt ' REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
- Please provide me with the classification of the watershed where these land application activities will occur,
as identified on the attached map segment:
Name of surface waters: (A. T. a F Tea-. i 1 c. Sw avM.
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission):
Proposed Classification, if applicable: N lit
Signature of regional office personnel: Data:
FORM: LARS 02195 . Page 9 of 18

"nrn-uc-oo rni uo-ui rui Q%IIQ - rna nu, JDOLetlntlou""""' -In u4
This form must be completed by the appropriate Regional ORiee and included with the.
submission of the application package.
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT ,
-- In order to determine the classi&arion of the watershed in which these Iarrd application activities will be
locoed, you aro required to submit this fq.= with items I through I completed, to the appropmiate Division of
Environmental Management Regional Water Quality Supervisor (see attacked M. At a mutimum, you must
Include an 8 5' by ll" co y of the portion of a 7 minute USGS Topoyrap i Adap which shows the subject
surface waters. You must Identify the location of the facility and the closest downslope surface warets (warms for
which you are requesting they classification) on the submitted map copy. The application may not be
submitted until this form b completed and included with the �abmittal.
1. Applicant (please specify the name of tlrc mmicipality, caporation, tndviduaL or other):
Ci1+y eF GlleleEr27tL✓
2. Name and Complete Address of applicant: 0004V DG Ll Affic 2ldd
City:, •40**A State: 09a hip: AV5091
Telephone Number.( 91a ) d67/'"38Z __
,IMF /
3. Project Name.. C/n'eF 66ea-949ZEW 4AW0 AR6Io' MEW. l pi!! Srnr23 WA
4. Mdume of residuals to ba bind applied: / OD dry tool pa year
S. Name of closest stnfacewaters: -ewa .arkamA
6. Com axs) wham land application sim,is located
7. Map name and data:
I. Applicant Sigaamte,
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the dassill ation of the watershed where these Ind application activities will occur.
as idemifeon the attached map segment:
Name ofsud=waters: 9,1%3
Classification (as established by the Eavuonmental ManagementCommisuon): C -scat
Proposed Classifuation, if applicable: N I A
Sipature of regional office personneL
FORM: LARS 02195
Page 9 of Is
1

vu ��••� ..Yl uvl VVVLVVVVVV 11 VV
This form must be completed by the appropriate Regional Met and included with the
submission of the application package.
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
In order to determine the elas=cation of the watershed in which these land application actinides WM be
located, you ate required to submit this form. with items 1 throug 8 completed, to the appropriate Division of
—, EnvironmeaW Manasement,Regional Wafer Quality Supervisor. (see avaehed iffdz At a mimmun4 you must
I include an 8.5" by 1 " copy of the portion of a 7 mizium VSGS Topograp6u . Map which shows the subject
surface waters. You must identify the location of the facMW and the closest dowmlope surface waters (waters for
which you ate requesting the classification) on The submitted map copy. The application may not be
submitted until this form is completed and included with the submittal.
1. Applicant (please specify the name of the municipality, tmtpontiod, individual, or other):
eR�oF L�i�l�E.RT�✓
2. Name and Complete Address of Applicant: Cm eF AgXfi t!
40, OOne /BM
City: A&t4JAa&1 State: -- - d/_C- - ._ Mir .?6360
Telephone Number.
3. Project Name: Q07Yde 4�?VA? G*. 2 AO Nroai7err Wct1 Fi�As 8-
4. volume of rpiduals to be laced applied: 419400 dry Taos pa year
I� S. Name of closest 3utface waters: _Z49 01M6f/ &Mdy g
6. County(a) where land application ate is locami t ��e:3o►i
7. Map name and date:
8. Applicant Signature:
TOr REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Ploase-provide me with the classification of the watershed where these land application activities will oc=,
as identified on the attached map segment:
Name of surface waters: Aa4S O(AVSLi SutO.w 0
Clasalicadon(as establishedbytheEnvironmentalManagement Commisdon), C' S
Proposed Classification. if'applieable: _ /A
Signature of regional office personnel: 9;,.-L R'R'� Data:
FOILM.- LARS 02/95
Page 9 of 18
1

SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATIONS
HINTON McCALL KING FARM - SITE 23
CITY OF LUMBERTON
LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
S&ME Project No,1588-93-004
FARM SITE
FIELD
NO.
COUNTY
SURFACE
WATERS
QUAD MAP
CLASSIFI-
CATION
H.M.King Site 23
1
Robeson
Ten Mile Swamp
St.Pauls - N.E. Lumberton
C - SW
H.M.King Site 23
2
Robeson
Ten Mile Swamp
.StTauls - N.E. Lumberton
C - SW
H.M.King Site 23
1 3
Robeson
Ten Mile Swamp
St.Pauls - N.E. Lumberton
C - SW
H.M.King Site 23
5
Robeson
Ten Mile Swamp
StTauls - N.E. Lumberton
C - SW
H.M.King Site 23
6
Robeson
Big Marsh Swamp
St. Pauls, N.C.
C - SW
H.M.King Site 23
7
Robeson
Big Marsh Swamp
St. Pauls, N.C.
C - SW
H.M.King Site 23
8
Robeson
Big Marsh Swamp
St. Pauls, N.C.
C - SW
H.M.King Site 23
9
Robeson
Big Marsh Swamp
St. Pauls, N.C.
C - SW

RAC tom
nisi ,�z3�Ql �
a
•
Soil
Grower. King, Hinton McCall
831 King Rd.
Saint Pauls, NC 28384
T'st Rahort
Copies to: County Extension Director
SUE Inc.
SUE Inc.
11
Aarm:
Altn:Cecil Link
3718 Old Battleground Rd.
4/5/99 SERVING N.C. CITIZENS FOR OVER 50 YEARS
Robeson County
Greensboro NC 27410
Agronomist Comments:
Soil pH is low in all samples. Apply the recommended dolomitic lime as soon as possible. Potassium is low in some of the samples. Manganese, zinc,
and copper are low in some of the
samples. The heavy metal concentration should pose no threat to crops grown on this land.
Follow soil test recommendations for fertilizer application.
T. Kent Yarborough
•�ei.�i�Q1 u�iQY LRnlld.ii�
a.ay}'.r/�/�t,yy(
�iYiLiIHe
iMCYMI m T A,, o "
. �..... f*e`..
5, a
�7{'y
n. ��'•` L+E54�iiw�.4 FE
Sample No. last Crop
o Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime
N Pros R0
Mg Cu
Zn
B Mn See Note
001 Berm flay/Pas,Mr
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M 1.2T
I
180-220 0-20 200-220
0 0
0
$ 12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class IIM% W/V CBC BS%
Ac pH P-I K-1 Ca% Mg%
Mn-I-Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-I
S-1 SS -I Na-N MA-N Na
MIN 0.6 1.40 2.8 54.0
1.3 5.5 65 12 40.0 13.0
16 19 89
89
75
24 0.1
eld41nP9in'nati�a.8�...;�r,���r
'7teda%ime
�R o m"" "•
r Q1�.I�1 eAltlafin B �
°
' '
,'%
�^i �� a �.
��.r°;�:�' �''TMai�•.,�'. _'a
Sample No. Last Crop
He Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime
N A 5 KO
Mg Cu
Zu
B Mn See Note
002 Berm Ilay/Pas,M
lsl Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M 1.9T
180-220 0-20 140-i60
0 $
0
0 12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CBC BS%
Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-Al(I)Mn-Al(2) Zu-I
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-I SS-1 NQrN A7A-N Na
MIN 0.66 1.33 3.7 46.0
2.0 5.2 59 36 31.0 10.0
44 36 70
70
14
27 0.1
ld#lriidr iaflon""°
li ill i»ie
=Recoirtime uii2tti S F
" °
Sample No. Last Crop
He Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime
N Pos RO
Mg Cu
Zn
B Mn See Note
003 Berm Hay/Pas,M
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M 2.6T
180-220 50-70 I10-130
$ 0
0
0 12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CBC BS%
Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI (1)Mn-Al (2) Zu-I
Zn-Al
Cu-I
S-I SS -I NQt-N A7d-N Na
MIN 0.66 1.28 5.0 42.0
2.9 5.7 34 46 30.0 8.0
103 71 132
132
27
25 0.1
a I oFutatipn+��
JK
,:�
♦.. -mc r.i
►e �Lim�
o Yr T/A
a v+ ,o, v r i : Z .a ti . y . 9
diY�cd dRtios. .'z�
Crop or Year Lime
,: v
n f r r. is. e
N W5 KO
$ t-
x
Mg Cu
Zn
B Mn See Note
Sample No. Last Crop
004 Berm I lay/Pas,M
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M 3.7T
180-220 0 120-140
$ $
0
0 12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class IIAI% W/V CBC BS%
Ac p1l P-I K•I Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-Al (I)Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-I SS-1 Na-N A7A-N Na
MIN 1.19 1.23 5.2 25.0
3.9 4.9 76 43 15.0 6.0
66 49 84
84
21
31 0.0

0'0
LZ
0£
ON
ON LL £II
0r01
07
0£ Ili 9'5 Z'Z
0'Y5
8,� 5£'1 WI NIW
vAr N-MV N-FON
FSS
I-S
I-n9
IV-uZ
I-uZ (Z) IV -Ulf (I) IV -Ulf FnN
%8N
%v.7
I JI I-d /ld aV
%S8
O'D A/AI %AW SSVIO IIoS
sllnsag;say
oia PoZ
ZI
0,
0
0 0
OLI-05I 0 OZZ-081
lz
W'sed/JsH uuag :dOJD 191
W'sed/Aell uuag 600
aaS
uN
8
uZ
no 8N
OX Sod N
arul7
avaA Jo do-1.9
V/,L Jd
o
doa,7 ISn'f(�� 'oN oldtuvs
g01oN
xif
o �n�� -O
w WW p��S
ry n l
alQ�idCall.v,..
' Y' q �" _outu� v �j p
�$i .. k'�ii9�°E,t�a! �.%la.
I'0
9Z
LZ
9L
9L yy 85
0'01
0' z
91 85 Vs O'Z
0'IY
Vr VI L—'0 NIW
vAr N-YLV N-VN
I -SS
I-S
I-n,7
IV-uZ
I-uZ (Z) IV-uN(I) IV-uN I-uN
%8N
%no
I JY ! d Hd aV
%S9
OV A/Al %NH ssvl,7lloS
sllnsag lsay
w0 PoZ
ZI
0
0
0 O
omo61 OZ-0 OZZ-081
JS'I
W'Sed/47BH uuag :dojo Isl
W'sed/hll uuag 800
WON aaS
uN
&
uZ
no 8N
oX s'Ord N
aut17
1vaA ao 60-10
V/d JA
o
doJ,71Sv7 ropy aldtnvS
�. x , 44 W �a
:� .._
duo uawwooa F
� N�E'r. - . .g.
aw a
_.n.l7P ll.r-.
� , r uo ;auuo ul, a
� - �.. ��. !._ _..J. PI.T�`
1'0
Iz
OS
£5
£5 Zz Iz
O,PI
o l4
ZI y01 8.5 Z-1
0'LS
87 £5'l 9'0 NIW
vN N-MV V-IDN
I -SS
I-S
!-no
IV-uZ
I-uZ W IV-UN(I)IV-UN PUN
-%W
%v,7
11 I-d Rd, oV
3.s9
an AA Val ssvp PON
sllnsag lsay
oi0 PoZ
ZI
$
0
0 0
OZz-OOz 0 OZZ-081
LI'I
W's'Sd/LsH uuag :doj0lsi
W'ssd/LEH Uuag LOO
OlON aaS
uN
9
uZ
n3 8N
off Sod Ar
au117
avaA JO doJO
V/.L `A
OR
dojo 1sn7 -oN aldruns
u►l p awtp i
aWil all
}irk ; T uogatgso�ul P.l?E1l
,
Wo
yZ
YI
£Z
£z OZ LI
0'
0'9Z
ZI yS L'S YZ
0'L£
8'£ OVI 9L-O NIW
vN Ar-MV N-'DN
I -SS
I-S
!-n9
IV-uZ
I-uZ (Z) IV-ul4(I) IV -UM I-nN
%8N
%v9
!-N !-d Hd oV
9iS'8
OD AA %NH SSVIO 1 OS
sllnsag lsay
a0 PuZ
ZI
- $
$
$ $
OZz-OOZ O£-NT OZZ-081
J,I'z
W'sed/AzH uuag :da0lsl
W'sed/dell uuag 9O0
01ON aaS
UK
9
uZ
no 8N
ON Sod Ar
ara17
avaA ro dao
VLL aA
OH
doa,71Sv7 'ON aldwvS
•
v
0'0
8Z
LI
Z9
Z9 ££ £
0'S
0'91
05 L Z'S Vi
0'9Z
9,y Wl IL'0 NIW
vN N-MV N-'DN
!-SS
I-S
!-n9
IV-uZ
I-uZ (Z) IV-UM(T) IV -UN I-uN
ON
%v,7
I-1 I-d Hd aV
%S8
OD AA %NH SSVIO HO
sllnsag lsay
oi0 PoZ
ZI
0
0
$ $
051-0£l 0 OZZ-081
H'£
W'srd/LsH uuag :da0lsl
W'sed/LEH W130 500
a1oAr aaS
um
9
uZ
no 8N
of Sorel N
MIT
avaA.lo doa,7
V/d JA
OR
daJJ 1Sv7 'oN aldruvS
00
op - - uo-- ,

am"t N4WWA�oMWAVMI� !��"n� ee. `J d! IFF,_. 11 W ' toy. --T -W- . ` ... 10
Heavy Metal Soil
Test Report
King, Hinton McCall
831 King Rd.
MEHLICH-3 EXTRACTION
Saint Pauls, NC 28384
Robeson County
Questions concerning these analyses should be referred to the Agronomic Division, Soil Testing Section
Cd
Ni Pb
Se Cr
Sample
Cadmium
Nickel Lead
Selenium Chromium
ID
mg/dm3 (ppm)
001
0.10
0.70
1.10
0.00
0.20
002
0.10
0.90
1.50
0.00
0.20
003
0.10
0.60
2.40
0.00
0.20
064
0.00
0.90
0.70
0.00
0.20
005
0.10
1.20
0:70
0.00
0.20
006
0.10
0.90
0.20
0.00
0.20
007
0.10
0.50
0.30
0.00
0.20
008
0.10
0.60
0.30
0.00
0.10
009
0.10
0.80
6.90
0.00
0.20
Report # 31853
Al As
Aluminum Arsenic
4.40
3.80
4.90
4.70
4.40
4.00
4.00
5.00
6.50

REPORT NUMBER: A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R 090-161 7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
SEND
TO: SBME (LUMBERTON)
ATTN: RICK BAKER
3718 OLD BATTLEGROUND RD
GREENSBORO NC 27410-2314
DATEOFREPORT 04/02/99 PAGE 1
ACCT H 45591
SAMPLES
GROWER: PON0469 JOBM1584-93-004SUBMITTED SBME (LUMBERTON)
H M KING(MAC) SITE 23
DATE RECEIVED 03/30/99
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT DATE OF ANALYSIS 03/31/99
SAMPLE
LAB
Nitrogen
Phos-,.�
per'
:,.POtaNum
$ulNr
C�Idpm
Meynedfim'
ySodium:,
t;:lron i
Aluminum
Men.,Copper
Lnc
Ammonia
Nitrate
IDENT.
NO.
N
P r
, Iti,-.f K r� `'r
d ya$
�`'.d
nMg1pY
� q.l}n
",Fa�
-A1 c. ,st
_Mn Mn
1'm9tk9:
„ Cu
Zn
Nitrogen
Nitrogen
tn�g
m9M9c
�mek9Q,rrm9pr
n8�9T„
',9
mgkg;;
m9�9',
m8�9
mg�99
,..m9kgicf.
001
09062
002
09063
003
09064
004
09065
005
09066
LAB
Cadmium
Cd
Chromium
Cr
Nickel
Ni
Lead
Pb
Arsenic f,
As
hietcurr
_ $elgftluTl
I�:"Qlgenlc't
r. r
�L,4pH
_ Total
#t;0.EC,
NO.
i
I.: (
gH9��..SP�
t'Nltr08en
,''
a)e?,.;
NO.
.
m9�9
mg/kg
m4�9
m8�9
: •mgAc9; :�
;',`"m9fkg.1
mg)
PPM
09062
0.01
< 1
MEHL
CH EX
RACT I
09063
0.01
< 1
09064
<0.01
< 1
09065
<0.01
< 1
09066
<0.01
< 1
This repo ""'a
p a vy K01
e .Samples are
Our reports and levers are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced In whole or in part, nor may any reference be made retained mail o
to the work, the results, or the company In any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. A8L EAS 6fl RRS, INC.

REPORT NUMBER: A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R 090-161 7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
SEND
TO: SBME (LUMBERTON)
ATTN: RICK BAKER
3718 OLD BATTLEGROUND RD
GREENSBORO NC 27410-2314
DATEOFREPORT 04/02/99 PAGE 2
SAMPLES
GROWER: P008469 JOB01584-93-004suBMITrEO
BY:
H M KING(MAC) SITE 23
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
Ego
ACCT # 45591
SBME (LUMBERTON)
DATE RECEIVED 03/30/99
DATE OF ANALYSIS 03/31/99
SAMPLE
LAB
Nitrogen
Phos'
Potasslum
Sulhlr
4'Cttlgitimc'
Malft lum
a<' SbEiuIn
, Iron
Aluminum
Manganese
Capper
Zinc
Ammonia
Nhrate
IDENT.
NO.
N
phorus
P
K r�
,,.
Tyi 9
% Pq�,
',8
,
t,Mg;r
I
� ,�; Na ,4 i
t.;
y r,., Fe
,AI
Mn
., Cu
�...
Zn
Nitrogen
Nitrogen
mg�9
mgMg
9 a
^8'i�
m9�9
; mgAcg"
mglkg
m9tk9,,
mBm9
mg�9
miVk9
..
,..m9�9rib
;;,.,9�^9 �ti
;�;mgAc9
006
09067
007
09068
008
09069
009
09070
LAB
Cadmium
Chromium
Nickel
Lead
I,.. Arsanlc
+Mlitwly,
tipt'hIgr§���r>h^y�'
af:�Totel�,t
1{yf ni,.ln
;.t
NO.
Cd
Cr
NI
Pb
Aq
...m9Mgt '
HHg�2{
&E
�
NIMVQ9n��ei
ye tfpHxri
CECS+t
on
f.
Mull
mg/kg
mgmg
mglk9
' m8rkg
fti.t! r8t
i'.
itX
d'dais. 4.,
1�g�
vna�'� ds'.tY
,< h ,. �:�.
PPM
09067
0.01
< 1
MEHL
CH EX
RACT
09068
0.01
< 1
09069
0.01
< 1
09070
<0.01
< 1
This report pl llit f y t le I Samples re
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced In whole or In part, nor may any reference be made retained a at Ii of �1 eF Qt e
to the work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. AdL EAST AI A OM Cl fA. INC.

SECTION VII
DAN ODOM FARM - SITE 24
r,

i
DAN ODOM FARM - SITE 24
SOIL SCIENTIST / AGRONOMIST REPORT
Soil Scientist / Agron ist
SOIL sc,
\GF, WILicQ� �s:
v � �„>sggweo
1098
NORTH

DAN ODOM FARM - SITE 24
The Dan Odom Farm consists of 4 fields located at 2 sites within Robeson County, North Carolina.
Field 1 is located approximately 3.5 miles southeast of St. Pauls, at Latitude 340 46' 28" N and
Longitude 78' 54' 55" W. Fields 2 through .4 are located approximately 2.5 miles southeast of St.
Pauls at Latitude 34' 46' 29" N and Longitude 79' 56' 33". The 4 fields contain a total of 53.1
(47.9 net) acres and are proposed as land application sites. The areas surrounding the 4 proposed
fields are predominantly rural and sparsely populated. A field investigation was conducted by an
S&ME soil scientist/agronomist on each of the proposed fields
Field 1
Fields 1 has a total of 10.0 gross and net acres. This field is used for hay and is currently
established with coastal bermuda. The field is primarily flat to gently sloping towards adjacent
tributaries, which drain to the north. According to the soil scientist evaluation and the information
in the Robeson County Soil Survey obtained from the Natural Resource Conservation Service
(Lumberton Field Office), soils in Field 1 is classified as the Wagram Series, with slopes ranging
from 0 to 4 percent. This series is well suited to the year around application of residual solids.
Fields 2 — 4
Fields 2 through 4 have a total of 43.1 (37.9 net) acres and are used for pasture and coastal bermuda
hay production. The fields are nearly flat to gently sloping towards adjacent surface drainage
features north and south of the fields. The soil scientist evaluation and the Robeson County Soil
Survey data indicates that Field 2 consists of the Wagram Series with slopes ranging from 2 to 4
percent. Field 3 consists of the Goldsboro, Rains, and Wakulla Series with slopes from 0 to 4
percent. Except for a very small area in the western portion (Rains Series), Field 3 is well suited
year around land application of residual solids. Field 4 consists of soils in the Wagram and
Wakulla Series having slopes from 2 to 6 percent. Soil in these series are well suited to year
around land application activities.

Fields 1- 4
Both the soils and the crops should be able to assimilate the proposed loading of liquids, solids,
nitrogen, phosphorus, heavy metals, and salts known to be in the residual. This assessment is
based on the residual analysis provided, the planned application rate, proper crop management
guidelines and adherence to permit requirements. Soil pH should be maintained above 6.0 and at
I•
levels to ensure optimal crop production. Nitrogen is considered the most limiting characteristic
of these residuals, however soil tests should be reviewed annually to identify any changes in the
nutrient status of the soil
Crop rotations and management practices should be evaluated prior to each application to
account for changes in the proposed crop rotation and land use objectives. Crop management
guidelines that will be of importance for this site will be:
• timing of application events with plant nutritional needs and periods of plant dormancy,
• split applications to prevent hydraulic overloading or nutrient leaching,
• performance of proper stabilization methods to fit crop and soil needs,
• establishment of suitable vegetative cover for currently forested agricultural sites,
• incorporation or injection of residual solids on fields that have a high incidence of
flooding,
• maintenance of proper vegetative cover on more sloping areas with runoff potential, and
• proper coordination between application events and crop harvesting.
The results of soil analysis for these fields (Fields 1 — 4) indicate no gross deficiencies in the
fertility of these fields. By using standard agricultural practices for the management of forage and
crop production, the operator should see significant benefits from the land application of residual
solids. In turn, these well- maintained fields should provide good assimilation of the plant available
nutrients contained in the residuals and afford an environmentally safe means of residual solids.
disposal and nutrient recycling.

For each of the fields proposed, an investigation was conducted by an S&ME agronomist/soil
scientist. On -site observation confirms the information obtained from the Robeson County Soil
Survey.

S&ME, INC.
FIELD INVESTIGATION SHEET
Type Of Crop:
Comments:
PROJECT:
FARM / SITE NO.:
FIELD NO.:
BORING NO.:
LYE] I IFcI 1►`I0[fl ao /_-4 Y (w
SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTION
HORIZON
DEPTH
TEXTURE
STRUCTURE
MATRIX
COLOR
MOTTLES
COLOR
O —lo
L5—
E
- �2
SL
C'
iZ) m �,y
—
Legend: s - sand
Is - loamy sand
sl - sandy loam
scl - sandy clay loam
c - clay
cl - clay loam
,Depth Of Seasonal High Water Table:
Depth Of Apparent Water Table:
Depth Type Of Restrictive Zone:
GENERAL INFORMATION
GI/ECL SucreO �� [/ray / aun10 f7P,PClC,4 W6 AJ
Most Similar Series: tv,<( ,
sit - silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
g - granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky
>s2
Described By: Be wiLC.fo X L. S. S, bate: 4/ 8J ] 9

S&ME, INC.
F
IELD INVESTIGATION SBEET
— PROJECT: C L/GYTL%�'i I
` FARM / SrrE NO.:
f
FEELD NO.:
3 Of BORING NO.: I
SOILS INFORMATION
SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTION
HORIZON
DEPTH
TEXTURE
STRUCTURE
MATRIX
COLOR
MOTTLES
COLOR
/DY2 7 2
G
G
C
/DuiZ/
C
l -20
SI'
b�Ie
C
o -ya
5L
C
Ia y2 7 G
C
o-sa:
S
C
/jrl-s
Legend: s - sand
Is - loamy sand
sl - sandy loam
scl - sandy clay loam
c - clay
cl - clay loam
Depth Of Seasonal High Water Table:
Depth Of Apparent Water Table:
Depth Type Of Restrictive Zone:
A - At loam
sicl - silty clay loam
g - granulu
wsbk weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk -strong subangularblocky `
>59
> la
NIL
GENERAL INFORMATION
Type Of Crop: s� /1
' Comments: `'YFL/ SN/72"D f Dir L�ERP oun10- /Tf'PUCs-TJan/
Most Similar Series: l��I��%1
Described By: pia O W ctxo u�, L. S. S . Date:

North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
// [[ TO //PRIVATE LANDS
Permittee: el -re Dr- ���77vYlOegR i7
Contact Person: llDuJ/t/L� /C &ekl
Address of Permittee: , et gex I&PA
L bez Aa. 28W�9
List of wastewater residuals to be applied to these lands: _ _ 2k6leka6 6ehZ5 gQvn We
Site M Number: S/7e-
2
Field Number: Fe,/Z5 d2 +d 3
Location of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site): 4 Sae Seirioy �LF,�
Owner of Property used for residual application: 2: n eel&M
- Lessee of Property (if appropriate):
Land use or cropping patterns:
Intended use or disposition of crops: bae4ei 7'ePd2
* * * * * * • * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits %Ig �cTY 0y LLfit2? 0�2
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location shown as
described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The landowner or his representative
receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permittee receives, in
consideration, the use of the land described above for the disposal of wastewater residuals. This agreement shall remain
in effect for the length of the Division of Environmental Management land application permit and shall be renewed each
time the land application permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to
abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in
advance, modifies or cancels this Land owner's Agreement.
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
FORM: LARS 02/95
Page 15 of 13

STIPIILATIONS:
I. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or
their representatives to inspect each parcel of property prior to, during, and after residual
application and to establish monitoring facilities on or near the application site as required by the
residual land application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their
representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, and
twelve (12) months after termination of, this Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application
permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resouces
(NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management (DEM) for the land described above prior
to commencement of residual application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum
application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with information and data
concerning the program for land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes
an analysis of constituents of the residual, residual application methods and schedules for typical
cropping patterns and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee for residual application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each
soil analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application.
Residuals may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a sufficient amount of lime is
also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime, residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to
the intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the
Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the
limits of the NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will
determine residual application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the results of soil
samples.
S. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the
permit.
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement
for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public
access to the land application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period
following residual application. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted at each site.
It. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee
or Land Owner (Lessee) prior to,and during application.
FORM: LARS 02195 Page 16 of 13

_ 12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third
party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the
terms and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all
provisions of this Agreement.
14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto
with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a thirty (30) day period following
the residual application. Application sites that are to be use for grazing shall have fencing that will
be used to prevent access during these periods after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of land to a new owner, a permit modification must be requested and obtained
from the Division of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and
agreements. In addition, a notice shall be given by the current landowner to the new landowner
that gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
- Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or
place on or related to the application site and facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of
— determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under
the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or
leachate.
18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with
another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement.
The land application of any additional wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals
specified by this permit, is prohibited.
N
Land Owner: ZRn ealam / Operator:
Address: 3Y35 0 (grea410aryq ALv4g 191V Address:
Phone No.: C9/D� �aS 7_ ! Phone No.:
FORM: LARS 02195 Page 17 of 13

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
have read this land owner's agreement and do
hereby grant permission to the Permittee to apply sludge/residual to my lands as specified herein.
1 /<
3- a q-99
Date
NORTH CAROLINA, 741/(.FO eD COUNTY,
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that DIJA/ 6,0O,0
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of 14,9,?-ul 94 , 19 9q
NOTARY PUBLIC r
My commission expires 2
SEAL: ROBERT P WILLCOX JR
NOTARY PUBLIC GUILFORD COUNTY NC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
06-03.2002
• a•• r r a•• r s a• r a s• r s• a r r r a a• r a a r•• r r a r s r s s a s•• a
I have read this land owner's agreement and do
hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
XIA
Lessee
Date
a/ r,, s r r• r r s r r• r r s r r• s r• s s r» s»• s s r s s
I, W . Pcw Q &ave read thi er.sapieme t n� h ereby
i abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
I
Date
FORM: LARS 02195 Page 18 of 18
agree to

-i
North Carolina Division of Environmental Alanagement
/r/-nr/7 Y"
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
TO PRIVATE LANDS
Permittee: 01/7- a u(. ZmiVM
Contact Person: 1jeL OZ A&,/ s
Address of Permittee: 'a'a. Ae r /36B
Site ID Number: 6,/TE2!\
Field Number. Fri'e5 �Qdl�ran11 �rw�
Location of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site):
Owner of Property used for residual application:
Lessee of Property (if appropriai
Land use or cropping patterns:
' Zs F�eR
Intended use or disposition of crops:
� r r r r r r r r r r r r r r• r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits 7 �f
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location shown as
described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The landowner or his representative
receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permittee receives, in
consideration, the use of the land described above for the disposal of wastewater residuals. This agreement shall remain
in effect for the length of the Division of Environmental Management land application permit and shall be renewed each
time the land application permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to
abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in
advance, modifies or cancels this Land owner's Agreement.
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
FORINI: LARS 02195
Page 15 of 19

STIPULATIONS:
The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or
their representatives to inspect each parcel of property prior to, during, and after residual
application and to establish monitoring facilities on or near the application site as required by the
residual land application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their
representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, and
twelve (12) months after termination of, this Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application
permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resouces
(NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management (DEM) for the land described above prior
to commencement of residual application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum
application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with information and data
concerning the program for land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes
- an analysis of constituents of the residual, residual application methods and schedules for typical
cropping patterns and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee for residual application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each
soil analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application.
_ Residuals may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a sufficient amount of lime is
also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime, residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to
the intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the
Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the
limits of the NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will
determine residual application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the results of soil
samples.
S. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the
Lpermit.
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement
for a period of eighteen (IS) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public
access to the land application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period
following residual application. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted at each site.
It. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee
or Land Owner (Lessee) prior to and during application.
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 16 of 18

12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third
_. party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the
terms and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all
provisions of this Agreement.
14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the -parties hereto
with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a thirty (30) day period following
the residual application. Application sites that are to be use for grazing shall have fencing that will
be used to prevent access during these periods after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of land to a new owner, a permit modification must be requested and obtained
from the Division of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and
agreements. In addition, a notice shall be given by the current landowner to the new landowner
that gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
- Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, 'premises or
place on or related to the application site and facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of
determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under
the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or
leachate.
18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with
another municipality,contractor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement.
The land application of any additional wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals
specified by this permit, is prohibited.
RESTRICTIONS:
Land Owner: hIckr' 1 f� T V-u (ec _ Operator: AC
Address: 7J 2 I /J;'QQg S+ Address:
67-, Ahu/S , NCd3'�F /��nfQitul�/•�U/L� a8�
Phone No.: Jl o - 8GS - 380 Phone No.:
FORM: LARS 02195 Page 17 of 18

— 1, , have read this land owner's agreement and do
hereby grant permission to the Permittee to apply sludge/residual to my lands as specified herein.
NORTH CAROLINA, L'U/LFQ"2O COUNTY,
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that 2zAg/ .T )C;14 1�:yny Qdd Ht
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of Ave/L /, 19. 4g
NOTARY PUBLIC '
4 My commission expires 3 Z 204 2-
SEAL:
_ ROBERT P WILLCOX JR
NOTARY PUBLIC GUILFORD'COUNTY NC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
06.03-2002
�" s s* r r s s s s* s s r s s r s *ssss • s s r s s s s» s* r s s s** s» r s***
I, have read this land owner's agreement and do
hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee
Date
» » s r r r » » » r » * » » * » * r » » r r » r » ssss » » » » * r s » * * s» » » » » *
J
I, �,O, �p4Q Pn w e. < < have rea24i
n er's a en o hereby agree to
abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein. �x `a%
Date
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page IS of 18

i North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
TO PRIVATE LANDS
Permittee: C/7-Y OE LG("86-ZMA/
Contact Person:
Address of Permittee:
List of wastewater residuals to be applied to these lands: Lv72
Site ID Number: J/Td 2y
Field Number:
Location of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site):5&V 56-G'Tia.d r
Owner of Property used for residual application: U—am o5 Jf & %urn aeu
Lessee of Property (if appropriate): [7a ti E. D lT/L
Land use or cropping patterns: �a
Intended use or disposition of crops: A-ttr ZleeiLk Zyec
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits V1.1— Z4ZO46e% 6m
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location shown as
described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The landowner or his representative
-- receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permitree receives, in
consideration, the use of the land described above for the disposal of wastewater residuals. This agreement shall remain
in effect for the length of the Division of Environmental Management land application permit and shall be renewed each
time the land application permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to
abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in
advance, modifies or cancels this Land owner's Agreement.
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 15 of 18

STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or
their representatives to inspect each parcel of property prior to, during, and after residual
_ application and to establish monitoring facilities on or near the application site as required by the
residual land application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their
representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, and
twelve (12) months after termination of, this Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application
permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resouces
(NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management (DEM) for the land described above prior
to commencement of residual application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum
application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with information and data
concerning the program for land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes
an analysis of constituents of the residual, residual application methods and schedules for typical
cropping patterns and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee for residual application.
5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each
soil analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application.
Residuals may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a sufficient amount of lime is
also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime, residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
7. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to
the intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the
Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the
_ limits of the NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will
determine residual application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the results of soil
samples.
S. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the
permit.
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement
for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public
access to the land application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period
following residual application. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted at each site.
11. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee
or Land Owner (Lessee) prior to and during application.
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 16 of l8

r�
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third
party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the
terms and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all
provisions of this Agreement.
14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto
with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a thirty (30) day period following
the residual application. Application sites that are to be use for grazing shall have fencing that will
be used to prevent access during these periods after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of land to a new owner, a permit modification must be requested and obtained
from the Division of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and
agreements. In addition, a notice shall be given by the current landowner to the new landowner
that gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or
place on or related to the application site and facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of
determining compliance with this permit; may'inspect or copy any records that must be kept under
the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or
leachate.
- 18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with
another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement.
The land application of any additional wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals
specified by this permit, is prohibited.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * * * * *
Land Owner: r-, Operator: �)A" O0101-
Address: '$' C) Address: '3 q'VS e -am u-(-104rdekc✓uf
Phone No.: �<f 3 �95 %9% Phone No.: (/7t g)XS biz y
FORM: LARS 02195 J Page 17 of 18

_-
-- I, ✓ ,q-mF..� /(/�� f ,9r� f.�� ,have read this land owner's agreement and do
hereby grant permission to the Permittee to apply sludge/residual to my lands
ssJas specified herein.
nd Owner
Date
NORTH CAROLINA, ( 741
/1—FOR-0 COUNTY,
I
_J
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that J;AMEs NE /L 714Afsentci
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of N'!?Y (o , 19 C/-%
NOTARY PUBLIC r
My commission expires fo,3 12062
SEAL:
flOBERT P WILLCOX JR
NOTARY PUBLIC GUILFORD COUNTY NC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
06-03.2002
••• a• a• s s s•• s• s s s s s s r s a••• a s••►• s s s• s s• s• s• s• r
I, ZW& Q,boiln have read this land owner's agreement and do
hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee
Date
r •pp•r r r s r11 •II ••• ♦ r• s ♦I r s• r r r•• •• r s►• •• r• r s» r s• s s s r r
Pn UJ � l I have read thi an er'.///La% s a en n j o hereby agree to
abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein./%
FORM: LARS 02/95
Date 0
Page 18 of 18

. . . . . . fill
1907
J
"Of
FIELD IA
FIELDS 2-4
- - - - - - - - - -
INC.,
14
SCALE: 1" = 2 mi.
CHECKED BY. gpW,
DRAWN BY: 8DB *S&ME
DATE: Apr-99 CNNRONMENT<L SERVICES . ENGINEERING .7ESIINC
SITE M"
Dan Odom Farm
Site 24
I

-Z-
3:-
AT�-�
A.
in P.
—If
Z7
t
h,
FIELD-2-
.1; Sandpit
7
FIELD -
FIE -4i ce
BM 157
10006
1160
If
Ho
es Pond\
Bay
k
(19311
ent.
qY
li Sh
157
:.000
19.
le
USGS TOPQUAD ST. PAULS,�C; CONTOURINTERVAL 5'
"/,.01
SCALE. P 2,000'
*S&ME
,
City of Lumberton
Dan Odom Farm - Site 24
Land Application Program
TOPO]
�Fi g�2
CHECKED BY: lepkv
DRAWN BY: SDB
DATE: Nlnr-99
JOB NO. 1588-93-0041 City of Lumberton

c�
SCALE. I " = 660'
����
[ENMRONMLNlAL S HMCLp - MUNUMNO - 1E511N0
City of Lumberton
Dan Odom Farm - Site 24
Land Application proqram
FSA
MAP
Fig. 3
CHECKED BY: fPhl'
DRAWN BY: SDB
DATE. Mar-99
JOB NO. 1588-93-004 City of Lumberton

l
ROWCROP /
I
1
1
FIELD -1
ROW CROP
ROW CROP
SR
(ADJACENT SUE PERMITTED)
ACCESS
WOODS
Legend
SR 1924
M
Dwelling A/`IA Wooded.A=
A
Structure (Bam) Dcmugeway
ly
Pond Acceaa Road
Well --- Property line ,
///////
Buffer A= X-X-% Fence
W
Wet.lrea 0 Rand Auger Boring
--ALE V-660'
1ECKEm BY �
*S&ME
City of Lumberton
Dan Odom Farm -Site 24
BUFFER
o7A;N BY: SDB
rNMMQM LMIAL S MMS • EMU-EUe i • MSTMC
Land A ' lication Program
MAP
Fig. 5
1 ^TE Mar-99
.109 No.
158a-93-004 City of Lumberton

I
I / FIELD - 2
A--7 O
I ROW CROP
ROW CROP WOODS
•� I 1 a - I
�1
FIELD - 3 ®�
1
, woons
I I l
\ woons LD-
\ �++ ACCESS
M ROW CROP
SR1784 SjjlOp6 . .t` ♦ •
� � I
ACCESS
It f #4 `.
I \\ Legend
■ Dwelling N^IA Wooded Area
• • SWcture(Bam) Dainagcwy
"• -<0 Pond Access Road
Well --- Property line
/////// BufferArea X-%•X Pence
W Wet Area 0 Hand Auger Boring
-:ALE I"-660' City of Lumberton
NECKEDer: Dan Odom Farm - Site 24 BUFFER
uAAWN EYq SD*Saw e E Land Application Program MAP
BATE Mar-99CNNFLNYLNIALSeKNCC5•LNUNL'LNINQ•msTNC JCENo. 15aa-93•Q04CdyOrLURIEBR00 Fig.5A

DAN ODOM FARM - Site No. 24
FIELD DATA SHEET
City of Lumberton
S&ME Inc. Project?No.1588-93-004
FIELD NO.
FSA Ac
NET Ac
SOIL SERIES
CROP
1
10
10.0
Wagram
Coastal Hay
2
9.8
9.7
Wagrarn
Coastal Hay
3
17.5
14.7
Goldsboro, Rains, Wakulla
Coastal/Rye Pasture
4
15.8
13.5
Wagram, Wakulla
Coastal Hay
TOTAL
53.1
47.9
Map Symbol
I Soil Series
GoA
Goldsboro
Ra
Rains
WO, WaC
Wagram
WkB
Wakulla

'hra-ua-aa ML uoloa HN aauc YHA Nu. 43tiZtiMytlU, ' ' 'e. UH
I
This form must be completed by the appropriate Regional Mee and included with the
submission of the application package.
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT ,
In order to determine zhe classification of the watershed in which these land application activities will he
located, you are required to submit this form, with items 1 through 8 comple*4, to the appropriate Division of
Envitoameutal Management Regonal P/'afer Qdg
Supervisor (see attached listing), At 3 minimum, you must
include an 8.5" by I Id copy of the portion of a 77 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the subject
surface waters. You must identify the location of the facility and the closest downslope surface waters (waters for
which you are requesting the classification) on the submitted may copy, The application may not be
submitted until this foram Is completed and included with the submittal.
1. Applicant (please specify the name of the mttnicipa w, corporation, individual, or other ):
Z. . Name and Complete Addtess of Applicant QRV eG 4ii&dAM ad
City: -4"-Mj tJta
Teh:phone Number.
3. Project Name: aMr—AF GCNnedMrddJ 44WO 40A6111.4770K AMAN 5irr2y
- 4. Volume of residuals to be land applied; 90o dry tons per you
-� S. Natae of closest surface waters: �23ksX*95 V FM &M//��
6. County(s) where land application site is locaed- KDtfG'.op_
7, Map name ad date: kAdEh Ile 710.0 G &A'0 /W
"! 8. Applicant 8ignarm: � �'ar -- go"
Ji TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of the watershed when these Ind application acdvities wM occur,
- as fdenMed on the attached map segmeac
Name of surface waters: 40 B;g ,/llaysla S�.m an��
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission):
Proposed Classification, if applicable: N 1A
Siafature of regional office personnel: Date:
FORM: LARS 0219S Page 9 of 18
1

SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATIONS
DAN ODOM FARM - SITE 24
CITY OF LUMBERTON
LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
S&ME Project No,1588-93-004
FARM SITE
FIELD
NO.
COUNTY
SURFACE
WATERS
QUAD MAP
CLASSIFI-
CATION
Dan Odom Site 24
1
Robeson
Big Marsh Swamp
St. Pauls, N.C.
C - SW
Dan Odom Site 24
2
Robeson
Big Marsh Swamp
St. Pauls, N.C.
C - SW
Dan Odom Site 24
3
Robeson
Big Marsh Swamp
St. Pauls, N.C.
C - SW
Dan Odom Site 24
4
Robeson
Big Marsh Swamp
St. Pauls, N.C.
C - SW

� -
� _
x l!
Grower: Odom, Danny
Copies to: County Extension Director
3435 E. Great Marsh Chu. ltd.
IMF Inc.
-
Saint Pauls, NC 28384
v oil
Test RepE
ort
Inc.
Farm:
AISIn'CecilLink
3718 Old Battleground Rd.
4/ 5 SERVING N.C. CITIZENS FOR OVER 50 YEARS Robeson County
Greensboro NC 27410
Agronomist Comments:
Soil fertility levels are low for most samples. Soil pH is low in some of the samples. Apply the recommended lime as soon as possible. Potassium Is low in samples 1, 2, and 3. Manganese Is
low in samples 3 and 4. Zinc and copper are low in sample 2. Sample 3 has a low copper'•level. Zinc is low in sample 4. These nutrients will have to be supplied through a commercial
fertilizer. The heavy metal concentration is well
within the limits of normal background levels and should pose no threat to crops grown on this land.
j
T. Kent YarborouRh
ield?lnfoi'uiaddn'�,
"".li�d��iine
R@"" t�igt"�in'�tion„"
-
Sample No. Last Crop
Ho Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime N M5 KO Mg Cu
Zn B Mn See Note
001 Berm Hay/Pas,M
Ist Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M iAT 180-220 0 190-210 0 0
0 0 12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS%
Ac pH P-I K I Ca% Mg% Mn=I Mn-Al (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-I Zn-Al
Cu-I S-I SS -I NC8-N NLA-N Na
MIN 0.66 1.35 3.8 58.0
1.6 5.8 136 16 38.0 18.0 27 26 54 54
35 27 0.1
F%Id�tiifor"m"a"tfoi4��������x
"' lip iL>Ime
plteso"i�ine x.tf "" , , " . •; ;, "'�� �' `
�.������ ���,����r:;
Sample No. Last Crop
Me Yr T/A
I Crop or Year Lime N R05 Ko Mg Cu
Zn B Mn See Note
002 Berm llay/Pas,M
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M IAT 180-220 0 190-210 0 $
$ 0 12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class IIM% W/V CBC BS%
Ac,' pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI (1)Mn-Al (2) Zn-I Zn-Al
Cu-1 S-I SS -I Nlb-N MA-N Na
MIN 0.76 1.5 2.6 42.0
1.5 5.3 144 16 27.0 10.0 47 38 21 21
15 0 0.1
e11446116ttiinatldn81' r
r .iediLiiiie
Iiiet`o
Sample No. Last Crop
o Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime N 130s A0 Mg Cu
Zu B Mn See Note
003 Berm llay/Pas,M
lsl Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M 1T 180-220 10-30 200-220 0 $
0 $, 12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class LIM% W/V CBC BS%
Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI (1)Mn-Al (2) Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-1 S-I SS-1 NQ-N MA-N Na
MIN 0.76 1.45 2.2 50.0
1.1 5.3 52 14 34.0 13.0 21 22 32 32
14 21 0.1

014WO oimatidMM- r
` -1W LtWe
400—
Sample No. Last Crop
Ho Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N h05 KO MS Cu Zn B
Mn See Note
004 Berm Hay/Pas,M
Isl Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M
1.6T
180-220 30-50 120-140 0 $ $
$ 12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class NM% W/V CEC BS%
Ac pH P-I K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-L Mn-Al (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-1 Zn-Al Cu-1 S-1
SS-/ NB-N MH-N Na
MIN 0.46 1.34 3.2 47.0
1.7 5.1 42 43
26:0 13.0
8 14 21 21 14 44
0.0
r

/ .�..,::7om.�._-...psi.._—
Heavy Metal Soil Test Report -
Odom, Danny
3435 E. Great Marsh Chu. Rd.
MEHLICH-3 EXTRACTION
Saint Pauls, NC 28384
Robeson County
Questions concerning these analyses should be referred to the Agronomic Division, Soil Testing Section
Cd N1 Pb
Se Cr Al
Sample Cadmium Nickel Lead
Selenium Chromium Aluminum
!D
mg/dm3 (ppm)
001 0.10 0.50
0.00
0.00 0.30
002 0.10 0.90
0.90
0.00 0.20
003 0.10 0.70
0.20
0.00 0.20
004 0.00 0.80
1.40
0.00 0.20
Report # 31850
As
Arsenic
4.70
5.70
5.00
5.40

REPORT NUMBER: A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R 090-162 7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone] ro
�
Fax No. [phone]
SEND
TO: S&ME (LUMBERTON)
ATTN: RICK BAKER
3710 OLD BATTLEGROUND RD
GREENSBORO NC 27410-2314
DATEOFREPORT 04/02/99 PAGE 1
0
ACCT 0 45591
SAMPLES
GROWER: PON8469 aOBN1584-93-004SUBMITTEoBY: SBME (LUMBERTON)
DAN ODOM SITE 24
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
DATE RECEIVED 03/30/99
DATE OF ANALYSIS 03/31/99
SAMPLE
LAB
Nitrogen
it�rus
Potnsalum
Sulfur,
;.:
siCeldum �(
Megitealitm
,� Sodium
:,Iron
Aluminum
Manganese
Copper
Zinc
Ammonia
Nitrate
(DENT.
NO.
N
P
K
i. ,Sac�.�
,� `3,1'
1 .M9 ,i
,.;,I:Ne
,.. Fe ..
AI
Mn
Cu
Zn
Nitrogen
Nitrogen
m9�g
mgAtgk9
' mBfk9
`.:
!;?.!m9�9
:, m1Ntg
g ;�99
m9�9'
mlYk9
mg'k99
.
0�.;!P0�9
001
09071
002
09072
003
09073
004
09074
LAB
Cadmium
Chromium
Nickel
Lead
Amenlc
Mtuaty�
WP$
r0igenk
t ��
,�,TMaI..
i
Cd
Cr
NI
Pb
,.Ng "
�.i'
�iN°�l
t "p, r
�'iC.EC,
,i:"
NO
NO.
mgfkg
mg&g
mgfkg
mg*g
8
(d6X®
.ir ?.`57r{f`;..(rike06
3 i.t."
�' ;�
y'Kltleik9,
t'.,��.�tl�kg;i,,'
PPM
09071
0.01
< 1
MEHL
CH EX
RACT
09072
0.01
< 1
09073
0.01
< 1
09074
0.01
< 1
This report a m ) t e. 9 le e
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in pan, nor may any reference be made retained r m �qq
to the work, the results, or the company In any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. AaL EASTE k6l 1tE5, INC.

SECTION VIII
ANGUS MCCORMICK FARM - SITE 25

ANGUS McCORMICK FARM - SITE 25
SOIL SCIENTIST / AGRONOMIST REPORT
Soil Scientist / Agrono 'st
V SOIL SC,
oc�?I wuLCO-L. rs�
au..
T098
SFNORTH
1
0

ANGUS McCORMICK FARM -SITE 25
The Angus McCormick Farm consists of 5 fields located approximately lmile north of St. Pauls, at
Latitude 34' 50' 32" N and Longitude 790 57' 25" W and contains a total of 93.2 (83.2 net) acres
which are proposed as land application sites. Portions of Fields 1 - 5 were included in the non -
discharge permit WQ0002217 issued to Briar's Waste Handling, Inc. (BWH). David Wallwork,
President of BWH has verified that the permit WQ0002217 expires on October 31,1999, and will
not be renewed. The area surrounding the 5 proposed fields is predominantly rural and sparsely
populated. A field investigation wasconducted by an S&ME soil scientist/agronomist on each of
the proposed fields
Field 1
Fields 1 has a total of 10.8 (5.6 net) acres. This field is used for hay and is currently established
with coastal bermuda. The field is primarily flat to gently sloping towards adjacent tributaries,
which drain to the southwest. According to the soil scientist evaluation and the information in the
Robeson County Soil Survey obtained from the Natural Resource Conservation Service
(Lumberton Field Office), soils in Field 1 are classified as the Lakeland and McColl Series, with
slopes ranging from 0 to 6 percent. A minor area in the northeast part, which may contains soil in
the McColl Series, however this field is well suited to the year around application of residual solids.
Fields 2 — 5
Fields 2 through 5 have a total of 82.4 (77.6 net) acres and are used primarily for coastal bermuda
hay production. The fields are nearly flat to gently sloping towards adjacent surface drainage
features northeast of the fields. The soil scientist evaluation and the Robeson County Soil Survey
data indicates that field consists of soils in the Lakeland, Norfolk, Pocalla, Wagram, and Wakulla
Series with slopes ranging from 2 to 8 percent. Soils in these series are well suited to year around
land application activities.

Fields 1- 5
Both the soils and the crops should be able to assimilate the proposed loading of liquids, solids,
nitrogen, phosphorus, heavy metals, and salts known to be in the residual. This assessment is
based on the residual analysis provided, the planned application rate, proper crop management
guidelines and adherence to permit requirements. Soil pH should be maintained above 6.0 and at
levels to ensure optimal crop production. Nitrogen is considered the most limiting characteristic
of these residuals, however soil tests should be reviewed annually to identify any changes in the
nutrient status of the soil
Crop rotations and management practices should be evaluated prior to each application to
account for changes in the proposed crop rotation and land use objectives. Crop management
guidelines that will be of importance for this site will be:
• timing of application events with plant nutritional needs and periods of plant dormancy,
• split applications to prevent hydraulic overloading or nutrient leaching,
• performance of proper stabilization methods to fit crop and soil needs,
• establishment of suitable vegetative cover for currently forested agricultural sites,
• incorporation or injection of residual solids on fields that have a high incidence of
flooding,
• maintenance of proper vegetative cover on more sloping areas with runoff potential, and
• proper coordination between application events and crop harvesting.
The results of soil analysis for these fields (Fields 1 — 5) indicate no gross deficiencies in the
fertility of these fields. By using standard agricultural practices for the management of forage and
crop production, the operator should see significant benefits from the land application of residual

i,
L
solids. In turn, these well- maintained fields should provide good assimilation of the plant available
nutrients contained in the residuals and afford an environmentally safe means of residual solids
disposal and nutrient recycling.
For each of the fields proposed, an investigation was conducted by an S&ME agronomist/soil
scientist. On -site observation confirms the information obtained from the Robeson County Soil
Survey.

S&ME, INC.
FIELD INVESTIGATION SHEET
PROJECT:
FARM / SITE NO.:
FIELD NO.:
r
BORING NO.:
SOILS INFORMATION
SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTION
HORIZON
DEPTH
TEXTURE
STRUCTURE
MATRIX
COLOR
MOTTLES
COLOR
a
S
/oY2Sz
(/7
Z6 -
S
C
iDy2 .
Legend: s - sand
'-- Is - loamy sand
_ sl - sandy loam
scl - sandy clay loam
c - clay
cl - clay loam
'Depth Of Seasonal High Water Table:
_'Depth Of Apparent Water Table:
Depth Type Of Restrictive Zone:
GENERAL INFORMATION
'Type OfCrop:
Comments:
Most Similar Series:
`Described By:
sil - silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
g - granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangnular blocky
S2. <
SZ
�tl .
Z14 xzE NO
Z,Z3 w/c!1'6 y, L.S.S. Date: `>A qc)
ii
L

LIType Of Crop:
Comments:
I Most Similar Series:
Described By:
I
PROJECT:
- FARM / SITE NO.:
S&ME, INC.
FIELD INVESTIGATION SHEET
FIELD NO.: Z BORING NO.:
SOILS INFORMATION
SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTION
HORIZON
DEPTH
TEXTURE
STRUCTURE
MATRIX
COLOR
MOTTLES
COLOR
0-/D
L S
/bY2 z
—
Zo
Legend: s - sand
Is - loamy sand
sl - sandy loam
scl - sandy clay loam
c - clay
cl - clay loam
Depth Of Seasonal High Water Tabld:
LDepth Of Apparent Water Table:
Depth Type Of Restrictive Zone:
GENERAL INFORMATION
WICU SU/TE 10 ) 2 VgW jT Y7d Al
sil - silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
g - granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangularblocky
ssbk strong subangular blocky
/ / �UxA/n
>
444
;Fd,q A(la-co z/, L. 5, S" Date: `EZS.Lq)

S&ME, INC.
FIELD INVESTIGATION SHEET
PROJECT:
FARM / SITE NO.:
FIELD NO.:
LGvw19o27_d1,J
/ifjAvil� /SITE 05 -
e�
J BORING NO.:
SOILS INFORMATION
SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTION
HORIZON
DEPTH
TEXTURE
STRUCTURE
MATRIX
COLOR
MOTTLES
COLOR
to -/g
100-35
S L
se /
rZ 5
5-52+
SCL_(LIsdr
56,E
Legend: s - sand
Is - loamy sand
_ sl - sandy loam
scl - sandy clay loam
J c - clay
cl - clay loam
Depth Of Seasonal High Water Table:
Depth Of Apparent Water Table:
Depth Type Of Restrictive Zone:
sil - silt loam
siel - silty clay loam
g - granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk- strongsubangularblocky
� .5-L „
> 5a
IVA
�l
GENERAL INFORMATION
j 'Type Of Crop:
Comments: Wi i 501 rr=o A/Z #Ew- tau v� i�l[ / �wT�d /V
Most Similar Series: k6leFDC
Described By: 768 WILCCoY, L,S,S, Date: 4 /S
Lq

LNorth Carolina Division of Environmental:Ylanagement
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND :APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
TO PRIVATE LANDS
Permittee: e17�Y Dr— Cu�nmy e"Q�iO
Contact Person: I`>eeW,12d' Af&f-1,S
Address of Permittee: " :et 'gdz /3ag
- List of wastewater residuals to be applied to these lands:
Site ID Number. 61725
Field Number. , fq W6 /—
Location of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site):
Owner of Property used for residual application: Ez 14,11
Lessee of Property (if appropriate): 14,Au 5 /�%��rhL'rYIIGG
Land use or cropping patterns: �I�Lar/e j /l*
94 We
r Intended use or disposition of crops: GGG1i36rCGl� 5� ��
• r r• r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r•• r r•• r r r r r r r• r r r r r r r r r r
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits an, GF "
i�
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location shown as
described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The landowner or his representative
receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permittee receives, in
consideration, the use of the land described above for the disposal of wastewater residuals. This agreement shall remain
in effect for the length of the Division of Environmental Management land application permit and shall be renewed each
time the land application permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to
abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in
advance, modifies or cancels this Land owner's Agreement.
l
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 39535
Raleigh. North Carolina 37626-0535
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 15 of 13

STIPULATIONS:
The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or
their representatives to inspect each parcel of property prior to, during, and after residual
application and to establish monitoring facilities on or near the application sire as required by the
residual land application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their
representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, and
twelve (12) months after termination of, this Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application
permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resouces
(NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management (DEM) for the land described above prior
to commencement of residual application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum
application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with information and data
concerning the program for land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes
an analysis of constituents of the residual, residual application methods and schedules for typical
cropping patterns and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee for residual application.
S. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each
soil analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application.
Residuals may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a sufficient amount of lime is
also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime, residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
7. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to
the intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the
Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the
limits of the NCDEHNR-DEbf permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will
determine residual application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the results of soil
_ samples.
f 8. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the
permit.
1 9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement
for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public
access to the land application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period
following residual application. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted at each site.
11. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee
or Land Owner (Lessee) prior to and during application.
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 16 of 13
1

12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third
parry, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the
terms and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all
provisions of this Agreement.
14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto
with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a thirty (30) day period following
the residual application. Application sites that are to be use for grazing shall have fencing that will
be used to prevent access during these periods after each application.
J
16. Prior to a transfer of land to a new owner, a permit modification must be requested and obtained
from the Division of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and
agreements. In addition, a notice shall be given by the current landowner to the new landowner
that gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or
place on or related to the application site and facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of
determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under
the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or
leachate.
18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with
another municipality, contactor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement.
The land application of any additional wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals
specified by this permit, is prohibited.
RESTRICTIONS:
I_ Land Owner: Zy h. // �Y
}� j Operator: A-,*,e3 'd/-'n/1
Address: 8�o W d''�` S? Address: 225 fK ts*alI4K
3' /s- n%o- . -2- ;; T � leesfs zr�we, .fC�-'. 29358
q
Phone No.: �/ ... Y-.''-- 2S 8'1 (� Phone No.: Z400� C9io) 739-631115—
FORM: LARS 02195 Page 17 of 13

I,
hereby grant
to the Permittee to apply
, have read this land ow �'s agreement and do
my lands as specified herein�-
Land Owner
Date
1 NORTH CAROLINA, y14
iLFo20 COUNTY,
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that Zyw.4'20 L3 //W" , .fe .
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of _ AU940H 2¢ , 19g4
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires Q / 1 060 Z
i
S ROBERT P WILLCOX JR
NOTARY PUBLIC GUILFORD COUNTY NC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
06-03.2002
a r• //•►� • a r a r a r• a r// r a a a r• s• r• r r a•• r••• r r r r t s a•• s a r r
have read this land owner's agreement and do
hereby agr6e to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein. A;'
Lessee
I, 4 Date
e r a r, s a r s s s a a a r r a a s1 s s a r a a s s r s s jand
I, � �% Toad T)0 W .0 ` have read r's a ee nt d do hereby agree to
l abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein/
' rerm
' Date
IFORM: LARS 02195 Page IS of IS
G iq
1

�.,.�..•-
a
.•,.,
�
:., y�
._AN
_..•-•—•-•-•' ..
FIELDS 1-5
'
e .1!.i..
_..--. •/ i
% 1 tip i'
\� 2
\� \ s^--•'•• n,
1•� -�
r. �e .-"�_ -•;� ,`
a '� D
,a�
�
® �
�-•'�
� lam
_ �.e ';�� '•\ o a
m
e �
,� .
\- •ice
p
/ %•
JIrJ �
i" Jam!
m • Jl2Il4
1
J
OMA
....1 :.� ` 1, t,
,� .
�' •.
•• r
1
,1
•�1
iJ' �
�\ /
lam Iml / ,m
!II Y.. •\ 3rr_�'`
PI
`\ \ )\ � t � J'
le
•
�
1 I
Jim
LUA
\
SCALE: 1" = 2 m1
&ME
SITE MAP
Mgm McCormick Fnnn
FIGURE ND.
CHECKED Sr. A9
DRAWN BY: SDH
Site 25
I
DATE: Apn99
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES • CNCINEERINC •'TESTING
JOBND.
1588-93-004

Cam
r-
Cam\
- -^ - '��, `'rs. `\• _
_FIELD - 3 `__ �--�
FIELD
'n ., T. `I —
in
— _
I
1\
alki
i I' )�
��r •
lFIELD -FIELD - S-
ldFIELD
-
410
\
, S •�:f i r ; , ,� .��� � , -e'er � _
I
-a- \1 .� -+ • _` _
ram~ _
a
\\
-I .� _ ���'��1=>•
�'.I
�. 1•-�� '�� '�-tea..-i.= '1`-,. y- _
-c4
McKinnon
Cam
Pool
ry
Armox.
,^
/ ,• \ Fsher
Cam
Ie
USGS TOPO QUAD - ST. PAULS, NC; CONTOUR INTERVAL = 5'
1 SCALE: I" = 2 000'
SAME
City of Lumberton
Angus McCormick Farm - Site 25
TOPO
CHECKEDBY: Zv(.t/..�.__.
DRAWN BY SDB
INNNUNNINIAL SENUCLS INUNlLMN4 TE]Iix4'
Land Application Program
MAP
Fig.2
DATE. Mar-79
JOB No. 1588-93-004 City of Lumberton
■

IRA
W.8
WaR
WaB
N6A ll
ae —4� Me
W.B'
.!-
W
NoA
IF]
m n WLdB
�i
-41
FIELD FIELD
N
A' 0
+ N
R.
N.A
G.A'
W.B
C.
NM
N
":m' .A i.
N�p
SCALE V - 0001 City of Lumberton
CHECKED BY w kp— Angus McCormick Farm - Site 25 NRCS
CRAWN BY SDB &ME Land Application Program MAP
DATE
NI(v-)9 UNURUNMEWAL 'IERM JOB NO. 1588-93-004 City of Lumberton Fig. 4
N

�
�!
•'��'
`�F�[`
�[.�•.

N
r<,
/ POWERLDYE'
�• FIELD- 3 RIGHT-OF-WAY
�
ITRAII,ER PARK 4 \
ra FIELD - 2 ®! I
I SR 1726 �
FIELD - 4
_ . ®1 WOODS
•
. I ROty CROPI
,I_ ♦ ACCESS
'I FIELD - 5
I ° FIELD -1 i 111 ®1
SR1726 \
i
i
SR 1980
Legend
■ Dwelling N�tA Wooded Area
Structure (Barn) -•--♦Drainageway
I d Pond A== Road
Well --- Property Line
/////// Butler:4ea r-C-X Fence
IW Wet Area @ Hand Auger Boring
;ALE I- - 660' City of Lumberton
tECHED BY: ohl Angus McCormick Farm - Site 25 BUFFER
DRAWN BY: SDS -'' S�ME Land Application Program, MAP
,TF Mar-99 lNNHGNNlN IL IERmUS - EMONLEWNG - 1X5nNG JOB NO. 1588-93-007 CRY of Lumberton I Fiq. 5

ANGUS McCORMICK FARM - Site No. 25
FIELD DATA SHEET
City of Lumberton
S&ME Inc. Project No. 1588-93-004
FIELD NO.
GROSS Ac
NET ACT
SOIL SERIES
CROP
1
10.8
5.6
Lakeland, McColl
Coastal Hay
2
27.2
26.6
Lakeland, Norfolk,
Pocalla, Wagram
Coastal Hay
3
19.9
18.6
Wagram, Wakulla
Coastal Hay
4
22.8
21.2
Lakeland, Norfolk, Wagram
Coastal Hay/Row Crop
5
12.5
11.2
Norfolk, Wagram
Coastal Hay/Rye
TOTAL
93.2
83.2
Map Symbol
Soil Series
LaB
Lakeland
Mc
McColl
NoA, NoB
Norfolk
PoB
Pocalla
WaB
Wagram
WkB
Wakulla

' 'i1APR. 6.19n 3:10HPH ENVIRONMENTAL MGMT FAR N01 3382B8A9A(INO.434 P.6/7h 10
ll l\ Y4 YV 11 3Y'VY YIf11L 11
This form must be completed by the appropriate Regional Office and included with the
- submission of'the application package.
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
In order to damtmino the classification of the watershcd in which these land application activities will be
located, you are required to submit this form, with items 1 thro h g completed, to the appropriate Division of
Environmental Management Regional Water Quality Snpesvisor (see attached listia¢p��� At a minimum, you must
include an 8.5" by 11" copy of the portion of a 715 minute USGS Topographic A which shows the subject
surface waters. You must identify the location of the fatality and theclosest downslope'=face waters (waters for
which you are requesting the classification) on the submitted map copy. The app6estion may not be
submitted until this f0m is completed and included with the submittal.
1, Applicant (please specify the name of the munidpatity, corporadoa, individual, or -other).
C'!� ai Gri�1BE2hW
1
2. Name and Complete Addressof Applicant: —66Y CG Z& ftR N&.g
D,e_ Boer /am
City: , 4&*w6we06a state: 1&e. Zip: 249$M
Telephone Number ( dZU ) to ll—,384;
v. FAR
3. Project Name: QgYof W ?vAl 44W O IPl4?7aW ��
6c.45
4. Volume of "duals to be land applied: 1200 dry tons par year
S. Name of closest surface waters:.. 7,e/&Z,ft rD,�ANla ?/CA1.dP.1/i���l�I1?P
61 Couaty(s) whem land application site is hxated: Ke6�
7. Map name and dare:
8. Applicant Signature:
TO.- REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please aA vide me with the classification of the watershed where these land. application activities wM occttr,
' � as [dendfied the attached map segtaent:
Name of surface waters: �rri bu-FaVi es Ibl,4ad PSrg Xlays4 Suaw.A
Classification (as established by the Environmental Management Commission):
Proposed Chtssification; if applicable-, N /4 l��
Signature of regionalof�cepersonnel: fS�Rg-'J� Date•.
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 9 or 18

SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATIONS
ANGUS McCORMICK FARM - SITE 25
CITY OF LUMBERTON
LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
S&ME Project No,1588-93-004
FARM SITE
FIELD
NO.
COUNTY
SURFACE
WATERS
QUAD MAP
CLASSIFI-
CATION
Angus McCormick Site 25
1
Robeson
'Big Marsh Swamp
St. Pauls, N.C.
C - SW
Angus McCormick Site 25
2
Robeson
Big Marsh Swamp
St. Pauls, MC.
C - SW
Angus McCormick Site 25
3
Robeson
Big Marsh Swamp
St. Pauls, MC.
C - SW
Angus McCormick Site 25
4
Robeson
Big Marsh Swamp
St: Pauls, N.C.
C - SW
Angus McCormick Site 25
5
Robeson
Big Marsh Swamp
St. Pauls, N.C.
C - SW

m . 0
07B _.-. p� _--...
Q149 514-_ 3QQ xli I<Q __ .
Grower: McCormack, Angus Copies to: County Extension Director
2604 Shaw Ave. S&ME Inc.
s+ Lumberton, NC 28358
Soil
Test Report 8&ME Inc.
" Parm: Attn:Cecil Link
3718 Old Battleground Rd.
4/ 5 9 SERVING N.C. CITIZENS FOR OVER 50 YEARS Robeson County Greensboro NC 27410
Agronomist Conunents:
Soil pH is low In all samples. Apply the recommended dolomitic lime as soon as possible. Potassium is low in samples 1, 2, 3, and 5. The heavy metal concentration is well within the limits of
normal background levels and should pose no threat to crops grown on this land. Follow soil test recommendations for lime and fertilizer application.
T. Kent Yarborough
cldJiifo""t7natIon
Vetluit
IRt co eiida ut�s
k
Sample No. last Crop
He Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime N P205 &0 Mg Cu Zu B Mn See Note
001 Berm IlayRas,M
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M 1.7T 180.220 0 200-220 $ 0 0 0 12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class 1131% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-I Zn-Al Cu-1 S-I SS-1 Na-N AH-N Na
MIN 0.66 1.52 3.2 44.0 1.8 5.1 123 12 5.0 8.0 50 3 131 131 58 27 0.1
TOMm w¢.. a. ... . .
field TnformM1697� �a> �.
'awn. '^4 a.�4r
lied�I�irn0
. ✓.rv.Rns+'rvY ] iY Y
tRecomtne "tlo w 4 "il � �"�R ' ����� r�s����� ""rya=
V
Sample No. Last Crop
o Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime N R05 KO Mg Cu Zu B Mn See Note
002 Berm Ilay/Pas,M
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M 2.AT 180-220 0 180-200 $ 0 0 0 12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class IL11% W/V CEC BS•,6 Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-I Zn-Al Cu-1 S-I SS-1 Nea-N NI&N Na
MIN 0.6 1.37 4.3 40.0 2.6 5.4 161 18 30.0 8.0 50 3 3 61 2 0.1
4
Pl ld,ltifotiiiation'..,o .:':,
""lied'l.ime
Recomimeti'daHon °= ���� � 's3
Sample No. Last Crop
e Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime N R05 KO Mg Cu Zu B hln See Note
003 Berm HayRas,M
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M .7T 180-220 0 210-230 0 0 0 0 12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-Al (1)Mn-AL (2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-I S-I SS-1 N(b-N ME-N Na
MIN 0.6 1.37 4.2 7.0 0.9 6.2 151 11 58.0 18.0 65 48 149 149 68 27 0.1
Sample No. Last Crop
He Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime N ROs KO Mg Cu Zn B Mn See Note
004 Berm Ilay/Pas,M
1st Crop: Berm HayRas,M 1.5T 180-220 0 120-140 0 0 0 0 12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI (1)Aln-Al (2) Zn-I Zn-Al Cu-I S-I SS-1 NQi-N NIL-N Na
MIN 0.66 1.38 3.7 57.0 1.6 5.4 255 42 40.0 11.0 64 48 76 76 57 33 0.1

0 a j8�tl
Sample No. Last Crop
NO
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime _
N @Os !d0 Mg Cu
Zn B dln See Note
005 Berm HayRas,M
1st Crop: Berm HayRas,M
1.9T
180-220 0 190-210 0 0
0 0 '12
2nd Crop: '
Test Results
Soil Class MM% W/V CEC
- BS%
Ac pH P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI (1)Mn-Al (2) Zn-1 Zn-Al
Cu-1 S-1 SS-1 NB-N Nfb-N Na
MIN 0.6 1.44 3.9.
49.0
2.0 5.0 267 16
36.0 10.0
36 31 485 485
463 43 0.1

Heavy Metal Soil Test Report McCormack, Angus Report # 31852
2604 Shaw Ave.
MEHLICH-3 EXTRACTION Lumberton, NC 28358
Robeson County
Questions concerning these analyses should be referred to the Agronomic Division, Soil Testing Section
Cd
Ni
Ph
Se
Cr Al
As
Sample
Cadmium
Nickel
Lead
Selenium
Chromium Aluminum
Arsenic
ID
mg/dm3 (ppm)
001
0.10
0.80
1.50
0.00
0.20
5.00
002
0.10
0.70
0.20
0.00
0.20
4.80
003
0.10
1.00
0.30
0.00
0.10
4.60
004
0.10
0.80
3.10
0.00
0.30
6.00
005
0.20
1.10
0.30
0.00
0.70
5.90

REPORT NUMBER:
R090-163
A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
SEND
TO: SBME (LUMBERTON)
ATTN: RICK BAKER
3710 OLD BATTLEGROUND RD
GREENSBORO NC 27410-2314
DATEOFREPORT 04/02/99 PAGE 1
ACCT M 45591
SAMPLES
GROWER: FOOD469 JOBOL584-93-004suBMITTEDBY: S&ME (LUMBERTON)
ANGUS MCCORMICK SITE 25
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
DATE RECEIVED 03/30/99
DATE OF ANALYSIS 03/31/99
SAMPLE
, LAB
Nitrogen
o�
N
Phos-
phoms
Potaealum
et
.Sul(uRr`
..
$ Celdrim,
'
�i
Me ileelum
o Sndium
'
Iron
�,: Fe,
Alu lnun
Manganese
Mn
Copper
Cu
Zinc
Zn
Ammonia
Nitrogen
Nitrate
Nitrogen
(DENT.
NO.
mg+k9
p
.�K
i,S ram ;h,s;;i�z}I
r
Y`S
?.!"law
�� ,Na.....
,_..Al ,:
mpg -
m0g'
m8A9
mSlc9
mog
mgAcg
9.:..
.v
gry
9}...
.fig,
.fig
001
09075
002
09076
003
09077
004
09079
005
09079
LAB
Cadmium
Chromium
Nickel
Lead
Antitank;
Mtxcuy�
{$ele`11111m
p,OfgenlCt-
Cd
Cr
NI
Pb
Ae 1
'cirN9,,,t
4? Sp
pa.NlUagan.
{ pH
'-C.EC
r-,.
. MO,
NO.
mglkg
mpg
mog
'mglkg,
mgIkd a
'femg')19i,t
ri,L* fig(mglkglr
S
`(metylo0g)
ti''r.;,
.a..
,.
PPM
09075
0.01
< 1
MEHL
CH EX
RACT
09076
0.01
< 1
09077
<0.01
< 1
09078
<0.01
< 1
09079
<0.01
< 1
This Wedar
on
pj�ps o� t pl I sled. Sa les are
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made Thi �qto thework, the results, or the company In any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. A8 A RfES, INC.

SECTION IX
JOHN MOODY SMITH FARM - SITE 26

JOHN MOODY SMITH, JR FARM — SITE 26
SOIL SCIENTIST / AGRONOMIST REPORT
Soil Scientist / Agrdfiomist
r,�
RO SOIL
ILC D
Wti\
�%
9� _ _
�NOKRTFI

JOHN MOODY SMITH, JR FARM - SITE 26
I
i�
The John Moody Smith, Jr. Farm consists of 6 fields located at 1 site within Robeson County,
North Carolina. The site is located approximately 8 miles southeast of St. Pauls, at Latitude 34' 40'
27" N and Longitude 79' 50' 4" W. The 6 fields contain a total of 151.8 (136.6 net) acres and are
proposed as land application sites. The surrounding areas are predominantly rural and sparsely
populated. A field investigation was conducted by an S&ME soil scientistlagronomist on each of
' the proposed fields
Fields 1,2,3,5,E
Fields 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 have a total of 131.4 (117.1 net) acres and are used for row crops. The fields
are primarily flat to gently sloping towards adjacent tributaries, which drain to the south and west.
According to the soil scientist evaluation and the information in the Robeson County Soil Survey
obtained from the Natural Resource Conservation Service (Lumberton Field Office), the soils in
these fields are classified as the Goldsboro, Johns, Johnston, Kahnia, Lynchburg, Norfolk, Pocalla,
i Portsmouth, Rains, Toisnot and Wagram Series, with slopes ranging from 0 to 4 percent. These
fields are well suited to year around applications of residual solids.
Field 4
Field 4 has a total of 20.4 (19.5 net) acres and is used for coastal hay production and pasture. The
field is nearly flat to gently sloping towards adjacent surface drainage features south of the fields.
The soil scientist evaluation and'the Robeson County Soil Survey data indicate that Field 4 consists
of soils in the Goldsboro and Wagram Series with slopes ranging from 0-2 percent. These series
are well suited to year around land application of residual solids.
Fields 1- 6
Both the soils and the crops should be able to assimilate the proposed loadings of liquids, solids,
nitrogen, phosphorus, heavy metals, and salts known to be in the residual. This assessment is
based on the residual analysis provided, the planned application rate, proper crop management
guidelines and adherence to permit requirements. Soil pH should be maintained above 6.0 and at

iJ
levels to ensure optimal crop production. Nitrogen is considered the most limiting characteristic
of these residuals, however soil tests should be reviewed annually to identify any changes in the
nutrient status of the soil
I
Crop rotations and management practices should be evaluated prior to each application to
account for changes in the proposed crop rotation and land use objectives. Crop management
guidelines that will be of importance for this site will be:
• timing of application events with plant nutritional needs and periods of plant dormancy,
• split applications to prevent hydraulic overloading or nutrient leaching,
L, • performance of proper stabilization methods to fit crop and soil needs,
• establishment of suitable vegetative cover for currently forested agricultural sites,
i
• incorporation or injection of residual solids on fields that have a high incidence of
flooding,
• maintenance of proper vegetative cover on more sloping areas with runoff potential, and
• proper coordination between application events and crop harvesting.
The results of soil analysis for these fields (Fields 1 — 6) indicate no gross deficiencies in the
fertility of these fields. By using standard agricultural practices for the management of forage and
crop production, the operator should see significant benefits from the land application of residual
solids. In turn, these well- maintained fields should provide good assimilation of the plant available
Lnutrients contained in the residuals and afford an environmentally safe means of residual solids
disposal and nutrient recycling.
For each of the 6 fields proposed, an investigation was conducted by an S&ME agronomist/soil
scientist. On -site observation confirms the information obtained from the soil survey of Robeson
County. Applicable acres on these fields consist predominantly of the Goldsboro, Johns, Johnston,
Kalmia, Lynchburg, Norfolk, Pocalla, Portsmouth, Rains, Toisnot and Wagram Series.

S&ME, INC.
FIELD INVESTIGATION SHEET
I` PROJECT: LGIMBFRTan/
i FARM / SITE NO.: :TDH J /}%aOl .SM i7-H /,S/TF Z(0
FIELD NO.: I BORING NO.: I
LI
SOILS INFORMATION
SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTION
HORIZON
DEPTH.
TEXTURE
STRUCTURE
MATRIX
COLOR
MOTTLES
COLOR
AA
--
E
ti
E44
-10
s-K
Q s ¢22-3
se-1
56�
!I s
a z�/3
3
34-
.sal
slog
/a z 4/¢
�D /��/2
+
sC-! Y �-
s 6 K
16.
/Q e,
Legend: s - sand
Is - loamy sand
sl - sandy loam
scl - sandy clay loam
c - clay
cl - clay loam
Depth Of Seasonal High Water Table:
Depth Of Apparent Water Table:
Depth Type Of Restrictive Zone:
�f
Type Of Crop:
' Comments:
1 Most Similar Series:
I; Described By:
sil silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
g - granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky
34"
>5z•
N/st
GENERAL INFORMATION
D.K. Fre LEAP koo,vo tiy�CiC�?7o vs
C—OL 5IIn en
Date: 4 S 9

I
PROJECT:
FARM / SITE NO.:
FULD NO.:
L
L�
S&ME, INC.
FIELD INVESTIGATION SHEET
G BORING NO.: I
SOILS INFORMATION
SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTION
HORIZON
I DEPTH
TEXTURE
STRUCTURE
MATRIX
COLOR
MOTTLES
COLOR
0 - `7
/s
a
/Q ,e 5/�
—
E
- 1Z
S J
/a /e 64-
—
/
/2 - Z8
sc/
6K
5
—
E
K
/D
-56+
.50 ,a f
5b K
/0 /e eo`l
/D 2 s14
r,
Legend: s - sand
Is - loamy sand
sl - sandy loam
scl - sandy clay loam
i c - clay
cl - clay loam
sil - silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
g - granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky
1 j Depth Of Seasonal High Water Table: 28
_ Depth Of Apparent Water Table: 38"
Depth Type Of Restrictive Zone: N!R
GENERAL INFORMATION
Type Of Crop:
Comments:
Most Similar Series -
Described By:
P R W//-L cu L/ , L. 5, S . Date: ! a19 c

S&ME, INC.
FIELD INVESTIGATION SHEET
PROJECT: L 0 /77,el"7D nl
FARM / SITE NO.: Iioou� S , rN /.S/ 7--'=- Z�
i
FIELD NO.: 3 BORING NO.: /
SOILS INFORMATION
SOIL PROFIL DESCRIPTION
HORIZON
DEPTH
TEXTURE
STRUCTURE
MATRIX
COLOR
MOTTLES
COLOR
6-9
/a sh-
—
E
s I
Xl- 61¢
t
- &
/0 5/(
—
16 tZ
-5 +
C-)
Idug s (o
7. S4
Legend: s -
sand
sil - silt loam
Is -
loamy sand
sicl - silty clay loam
sl -
sandy loam
g - granular
scl -
sandy clay loam
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
c -
clay
msbk - medium subangular blocky
cl -
clay loam
ssbk -strong subangular blocky
- Depth Of Seasonal High Water Table: �2
i Depth Of Apparent Water Table:
UDepth Type Of Restrictive Zone: na 1 (A -
GENERAL INFORMATION
Type Of Crop: -2` C. ciza
UComments: 144at_ 4u/7FQ �12 I/- 1&Uvr� 1kPt-/c<l.nAN5
Most Similar Series: Wn& rj F I'n
I- Described By: Wb13 A&U-6Y., L 5.5 . Date: ¢.1-9f 9-7
1

i
I
I`1
PROJECT:
FARM / SITE NO.:
FIELD NO.:
S&ME, INC.
FIELD INVESTIGATION SHEET
iY? 9E1..Td n1
30H-"J mt,00y Sin, r-h- ✓' JlTE 2�
4 130MG NO.: I
SOILS INFORMATION
SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTION
HORIZON
DEPTH
TEXTURE
STRUCTURE
MATRIX
COLOR
MOTTLES
COLOR
A
-8
/5
M1 be $lZ
—
F
_
sr
8� !
o -37-
sal
16 5�6
`
Bt Z
3 t
scl
6K
/ 25/G
¢�6
Legend: s - sand
— Is - loamy sand
C sl - sandy loam
scl - sandy clay loam
c - clay
cl - clay loam
1 !Depth Of Seasonal High Water Table: —Depth Of Apparent Water Table:
Depth Type Of Restrictive Zone:
GENERAL INFORMATION
SHs773� �EQl41UpA �I—�5"Tur[E
Type Of Crop:
I. .
Comments:
Most Similar Series:
' Described By:
sil - silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
g - granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangular blocky
ssbk -strong subangularblacky
� 52°
ti 5Z ri
WAc-ita[in
�e k11zzeoK,. L . 5.5 . Date:

i
— PROJECT:
i
J
FARM I SITE NO.:
S&ME, INC.
FIELD INVESTIGATION SHEET
Lumar,atzAl
FIELD NO.: Jr BORING NO.:
SOILS INFORMATION
SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTION
HORIZON
DEPTH
TEXTURE
STRUCTURE
T MATRIX
COLOR
MOTTLES
COLOR
o-g
is
s
i—
g- 15
5
/U 2 6
—
+
5- 34
scl
5bK
/4 ,esho
—
13 t- 2
-52+
C,
rr_'/a
Legend: s -
sand
sil - silt loam
` Is -
loamy sand
sicl - silty clay loam
_ sl -
sandy loam
g - granular
scl -
sandy clay loam
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
c -
clay
msbk - medium subangular blocky
' cl -
clay loam
ssbk - strong subangular blocky
�' Depth Of Seasonal High Water Table: y S Z r
Depth Of Apparent Water Table: 5 2
Depth Type Of Restrictive Zone: N P,
GENERAL INFORMATION
Type Of Crop: i2o N c Rd P
Comments:
I_
' Most Similar Series:
' Described By:
Web WLcoY, L.S.S. Date: 4Ialgg

S&ME, INC.
FIELD INVESTIGATION SHEET
— PROJECT:
FARM/SITE NO.: 36 NnI IV64/;,I .5M., i/! I MITE 7(0
FIELD NO.: BORING NO.: I
SOILS INFORMATION
SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTION
HORIZON
DEPTH
TEXTURE
STRUCTURE
MATRIX
COLOR
MOTTLES
COLOR
—
10 - 28C4
P- 614
PR -
scl
14 p- 5/&
—
t2
3 -5zt
scl
SW
/ s&
s�
ii
it Legend: s -
sand
Is -
loamy sand
at -
sandy loam
1 ! scl -
sandy clay loam
c -
clay
cl -
clay loam
sil - silt loam
sicl - silty clay loam
g - granular
wsbk - weak subangular blocky
msbk - medium subangularblocky
ssbk - strong subangular blocky
Depth Of Seasonal High Water Table: � 5 2 "
Depth OfApparent Water Table: 7 52'
Depth Type Of Restrictive Zone: N//}
GENERAL INFORMATION
UType Of Crop:U 6 W)
' Comments:
' Most Similar Series:
' Described By:
Date: 41,1 Iqq

,J
North Carolina Division of Environmental Afanagement
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
/ TO /PRIVATE LANDS
Permittee: 67? D.= CL�/G//Wig,,'Q �
Contact Person: llaW I�2 t� /Cec e-ll
Address of Permittee: Ae BDX /3,qg
y L4mlhele'161 Ad. Z8358
List of wastewater residuals to be applied to these lands- _ + _ 126", eluag cS f Z-.5 9QW `f f We
Site ID Number:
Field Number: Ar'ed-5 /—/0
j Location of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site):
L'
Owner of Property used for residual application: /1n aee4 5'M /V'4 L7e
Lessee of Property (if appropriate):
Land use or cropping patterns: '&e-a ncxo S
L
Intended use or disposition of crops:
r • r t • r. t r • • r • r • • r • • ■ r r s • r • • • • r i s i • : • t • • + • • ,► r a :
The undersigned landowner or his representative hereby permits t-llYOF 6r!e�ut �C-.
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location shown as
described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The landowner or his representative
receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permittee receives, in
consideration, the use of the land described above for the disposal of wastewater residuals. This agreement shall remain
in effect for the length of the Division of Environmental Management land application permit and shall be renewed each
._ time the land application permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to
abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in
advance, modifies or cancels this Land owner's Aereement.
J
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
FORM: LARS 02/95 Page 15 of 13
1

STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or
their representatives to inspect each parcel of property prior to, during, and after residual
application and to establish monitoring facilities on or near the application site as required by the
I
residual land application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their
j representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, and
twelve (12) months after termination of, this Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application
permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resouces
(NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management (DEM) for the land described above prior
to commencement of residual application. The NCDEHNR-DEM permit will specify maximum
application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with information and data
concerning the program for land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes
an analysis of constituents of the residual, residual application methods and schedules for typical
cropping patterns and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee for residual application.
S. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each
soil analysis.
6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application.
Residuals may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a sufficient amount of lime is
also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime, residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
7. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to
the intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the
Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the
limits of the NCDEHNR-DEM permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will
determine residual application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the results of soil
samples.
8. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the
permit.
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement
for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public
access to the land application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period
following residual application. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted at each site.
It. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee
or Land Owner (Lessee) prior to and during application.
FORM: LARS 02195
Page 16 of 18

12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third
party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the
terms and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all
provisions of this Agreement.
14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto
with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a thirty (30) day period following
i the residual application. Application sites that are to be use for grazing shall have fencing that will
be used to prevent access during these periods after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of land to a new owner, a permit modification must be requested and obtained
from the Division of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and
agreements. In addition, a notice shall be given by the current landowner to the new landowner
' that gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
j Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or
place on or related to the application site and facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of
determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under
the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or
leachate.
18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with
another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement.
The land application of any additional wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals
specified by this permit, is prohibited.
RESTRICTIONS:
I
ii
Land Owner: .TAn /?101�4 J�inli� 1%2. Operator:
L / /
Address: SS-?4 7^2 EEr' ,cctacQ Address:
u�ttfeee9tvi} .(/. C . .283SB
Phone No.: 6?10) 23`7 _ y282 Phone No.:
' FORM: LARS 02195 Page 17 of 18

I
I, s&ha /yIlone ., J�ir7 lyl VP-- , have read this land owner's agreement and do
hereby grant permission to the Permitt6e to apply sludge/residual to in lands as specified herein.
and Owner
_ - 2
/ ! Date
NORTH CAROLINA, l 7U/LFae,D COUNTY,
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that JO q&f MbW u . MITYf Zip ,
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of IV.Oee v 9,- , 19 qq
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires 603312002
SEAL: ROBERT P WILLCOX JR
NOTARY PUBLIC GUILFORD COUNTY NC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
06-03.2002
r••• r r r r r r s s s• s• s s s r r s r r r s s s s s• s s s s s s s s s r r r r r s
I, have read this land owner's agreement and do
hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
AIA
Lessee
Date
i
r r r r r r r r r s s• r s s r Todd
r• s•• s••• a• s s s• s s• s s r r r r s s s s
TDOd A we I I have read this �oer?'sag, ement and do hereby agree to
Jabide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein., �J
FORM: LARS 02195
Date
Page IS of 18
1

SCALE: Ip" = 2 %Iles
'CHECKED BY: FPW .. &MEL
DRAWN BY: NDB -DATE' %larch.-99 LNMRUNNLNIAL SERMCLS-LNONEEMNU-nSTINU
John Moody Smith,Jr. Farm - Site 26
1588-93-004 City of Lumberton
SITE
MAP
Fiq. 1

It I I T
ATjlri-ft 1
f
L -I�A T.-t
Ai'llt I, 1
I I
0 C\!
0
Illy 111 14
-.V.
� I Ij ,
tit iltit III." III
�f f I I
itlil 1, 1, it iltl
l.- U-
If
f I I
It
i il I I I 1
I fit
Il I If
11,
14 t It I I. fit
If flIl Ili(1441
1, 11CID
Ilf 1 4
il
4.
N
if III 11
41 1, it I
if
f If It
i if 14 1
2?
. U)
I t
1 it
It
it I
r If I
I.W 4 4'1
4
il
-j
—M
—
a E
'D LL
0
tit
f f, , j
1 ;111!
eq if w
M
I
lilt If I
f, 4
vIll -if
0 U)
>, <
mi -0
0
Ij I
If
if
A
it 11
A! Al
Wit
If
it t fl
I' If
f
10
Ilk
f.J
X11
If
If
it
t ti
n
-
1,
10
10
1

'AMR,

N
f^'It
N A
1 w e n s ar Sj MaB
•ate KaA w e�• y� � .�,�. a f tyµ >, . _ �� R. � �.. � 1 �
-
_'�� 4 a• �P"ra;— T .NOB Y � 4 ,,,������ssssss t
�vP . ,r: - � a • •' Zoe .} .. �� t���
Aa no.f M°�•Irav a _� <
.. c.o„laa
F
Wa8 GOA � waB �.•
_t' 1t aB
a. � 1 J Noe fiP�" '� (f. GOA yH5 FIELD - 3
iybA 4 G°F GOA W B iI i I' ill• F��' rt�
FIELD - 4! a FIELD 2
':.t GOA A 1 Gt
a'.:'
a GOA LY ' \ Wd t L No •> Gs a
% W,B ° FIELD II ,
r W B
_ N
. • 1 caaP t. Ft� r i- � f
GOR Y T M N A i P� S• •. -' u9 W '
+=
OA . a .G A � B' r \ �� �0 T::' 'a+'v" ��^' ; •r '`;w f Pel
fb
.• 1
` N'aB Ra
WaB y
L•
P.B Po
SCALE t°=Z,'000' City•of Lumberton
CHECKED BY: pyr&ME John Moody Smith,Jr. Farm - Site 26 NRCS
DRAWN BY: See Land Application Program M"
DATE' Nfar-99 JCB No. 1588-93-004 City of Lumberton Fig. 4

- , i— i , I _ I (» i —.
�ELgOAD)
All
SRlooa ITA�
0
I � r
OUT
I WOODS
FIEL'D-�'6
r ►,
� 6%
$41
7 6
,
FIELD - 5 �
WOODS I
OFIELD-4
A g�{�
OUT
WOODS
1W
1" = 660'
Rpt✓
SDB
Apr-99 _
®'
FIELD - 3
e
F ELD-2
FIELD - I
1
S&ME City Sof mLumberton
John Moody Smilh,Ir. Fame - Site 26
Lond Application Program
L 5[RVIC[5 • ENpNCERINh • tE511NC J BNO. 1588.93-004
FIGURE NO.
IUFFER
MAP
Fig. 5

JOHN MOODY SMITH, JR FARM - SITE 26
FIELD DATA SHEET
< City of Lumberton
S&ME Inc. Project No.1588-93-004
FIE O.
GROSSAcINETAcl
SOIL SERIES
CROP
1
27.8
27.1
Johns, Johnston, Kalmia
Portsmouth
Row Crop
2
20.5
19.1
Goldsboro, Pocalla
Row Crop
3
42.1
38.6
Goldsboro, Toisnot, Wagram
Row Crop
4
20.4
19.5
Goldsboro, Wagram
Coastal Pasture/Hay
5
gI
13.5
11.8
Lynchburg.Norfolk, Rains
Wagram
Row Crop
6
27.5
20.50
Goldsboro, Lynchburg, Norfolk
Rains, Wagram
. Row Crop
TOTAL
151.8
136.6
Map Symbol
7Soil Series
Goldsboro
GoA,GoB
Johns
Jo
Johnston
it
Kalmia
KaA
Lynchburg
Ly
Norfolk
NoA,NoB
Pocalla
PoA, PoB
Portsmouth
Pt
Rains
Ra
Toisnot
Ta
Wagram
WaB

.6P1. K ,l4-yy� WhO 0l : b4 NCI MI " u u �� V FH% NV, 33tiGtl Udu +„ ��� uc
i�i�
This form must be completedbmissiothe n of ptlpropriate application Regional
Office
and included with the
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
In order to determine the classification of the watershed in which these land application activities will
of
located, you are required to submit rids Soren, with items 1 through B completed, to a app p
Environmental Management Regional Water Quality Supervisor (see attached vsdV. At a minimum, you must
include an 9.5" by I I" copy of the portion of a 7.5 minute USGS Topographic Map which shows the subject
surface waters. You must identity the location of the facility and the closest downslope surface waters (waters for
which you are requesting the classification) on the submitted map copy. The application may not be
submitted until this form is completed and included with the submittal.
1. Applicant (please specify the name of the municipality, corporation, individual. or other):
Gr G4PM,8.6iQM WW7-P
Z. Name and Complete Address of Applicant:
3.
—Zip: 2-9
Telephone Number(
n
proj=Na=:
Volume of residuals to be land applied: &F400 dry tons per year
Name of closest surface waters: y,21 11W )4 1 o%d &
County(s) where Ian(
7. Map name and date:
S.
Applicant Signature:
TO: REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classificadan of the watershed where these land application activities will occur,
tJ as ideudW on the attached map segment:
1 Name of surface waters:
L( classification (as established by the Erivirorrmental Management Commission):
Proposed Classification, if applicable:
J Signanrre, of regional office personnel: Date:
ii
FORM. LARS 02195 Page 9 of 1S
1

SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATIONS
JOHN MOODY SMITH, JR. FARM - SITE 26
CITY OF LUMBERTON
LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
S&ME Project No, 1588-93-004
FARM SITE
FIELD
NO.
COUNTY
SURFACE
WATERS
QUAD MAP
CLASSIFI-
CATION
J.M.Smith, Jr. Site26
1
Robeson
Tributary to/and Big Swamp
Tarheel, N.C.
C -SW
J.M.Smith, Jr. Site26
2
Robeson
Tributary to/and Big Swamp
Tarheel, N.C.
C -SW
J.M.Smith, Jr. Site26
3
Robeson
Tributary to/and Big Swamp
Tarheel, N.C.
C-SW
J.M.Smith, Jr. Site26
4
Robeson
Tributary to/and Big Swamp
Tarheel, N.C.
C -SW
I.M.Smith, Jr. Site26
5
Robeson
Tributary to White Oak Swamp
Tarheel, N.C.
C -SW
J.M.Smith, Jr. Site26
6
Robeson
Tributary to White Oak Swamp
Tarheel, N.C.
C -SW
U
1

mrAc
Grower.- Smith Jr., John Weedy Copies to. County Extension Director
1111 Tarheel Rd. S&ME Inc.
Lumberton, NC 28358
r s Soil TestS&MERParm: Attn:Bo:Bobport
b Branch
3718 Old Battleground Rd.
4/20 SERVING N.C. CITIZENS FOR OVER 50 YEARS Robeson County Greensboro NC 27410
Agronomist Comments:
The heavy metal concentration is well within the limits of normal background levels and should pose no threat to crops grown on this land. Follow soil test recommendations for lime and
fertilizer application. M. Ray Tucker
d o
x
... ,.«.,s,....�.s.........i�w�...3aO�«1Fie
is>�1.a5.reL�r1
Sample No. Last Crop
Ho Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime N M5 X 0 bfg Cu Zn B Mn See Note
001 Coin Grain
1st Crop: Soybeans .5T 0 50-70 20-40 0 0 0 0 3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class IIM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg106 Mn-1 Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS -I NO;-N M&-N Na
MIN 1.02 1.34 4.5 73.0 1.2 5.6 32 56 4.0 19.0 322 203 126 126 60 56 0.1
..., .
Fie I of rtrahon r.. 4
..
lied Lime
Recommendatmns ...w= r.fi_ ,' . g < g r , `, 0 ,',77 7777 &7 � -7 _. s�.._r7 ,77 ? s x4_ 7 � 7 Y `t. :.
Sample No. Last Crop
Ho Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime N M5 W Mg Cu Ze B Mn See Note
002 Corn Grain
1st Crop: Soybeans 1T 0 60-80 30-50 0 0 0 0 3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I KI Ca% Mg'06 Mn-I Mn-Al (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-I S-I SS-1 NC&-N MA-N Na
MIN 1.55 1.32 4.4 52.0 2.1 5.5 30 50 34.0 12.0 35 31 76 76 47 46 0.0
Field Infoiviatipn-,:"
0Iie l,Llme
'Aldo ientiatiousn 77w +7
_
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yi T/A
Crop or Year Lime N PROS Kzo Mg Cu Zn B Mn See Note
003 Corn Grain
1st Crop: Soybeans 0 0 0 0-20 0 0 0 0 3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-1 Za-AI Cu-I S-1 SS -I NtW-N Md-N Na
MIN 0.86 1.35 5.1 78.0 1.1 6.0 97 71 56.0 15.0 52 41 123 123 89 44 0.0
Field In or�alloi7 _ „ ..-;
_ ,..
lied Lime
�. ray All
'Recommendallotts„` ; '-a � .. �,
. <
Sample No. Last Crop
Ho Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime N P205 KO Mg Cu Zn B Mn See Note
004 Berm Hay/Pas,M
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M .5T 180-220 0 14o-16o 0 0 0 0 12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mr16 Mn-I Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zu-I Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS-1 M-N AT&W Na
MIN 0.51 1.43 3.4 82.0 0.6 6.2 . 87 34 58.0 20.0 89 63 89 89 83 26 0.0

"�� ".. �xi`1
i
*.a.tf y�f' `.% ± �?'.st`N k771
{
.«.� ' � .y.F.
�8e
DA onointe rvisron 301k ee
Qa �.. Roan .gale
rya.
�,vv r_-FRU _
91S a r'jT-5, z�vcowor Sintuaur. jo _
ace
un
� O )na3
Field l' _
nformation
b6 .
lted>I ni
. _ ,.�
Recommei►da,WW11
,... ,.�
Sample No. Last Crop
He
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N 1305 ICO Mg Cu
Zu
B
Mn
See Note
005 Soybeans
1st Crop: Corn Grain
.6T
120-160 0 80-100 0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CBC
BSI-6
Ac pH P-I
K-I Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-I
SS-1
NC8-N 117E-N Na
MIN 0.6 1.40 .9
5.0
1.2 5.4 157
25 44.0 12.0
69 58 98 98
66
30
0.0
Field lnfomratiop;a .._ ,;
, .
lied Lime
:Reeori►mendaHons, ; j =; M x3. .,rib=' ,_. . ., a, s. s,W,'
Sample No. Last Crop
He
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N Pros &0 Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
006 Soybeans
1st Crop: Corn Grain
1T
120-160 0 50-70 0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC
BS•.6
Ac pH P-I
K-1 Ca% Mg%
Mn-I Mn-A1(1)Mn-A1(2) Zn-I Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-I
SS-1
TCB-N A7h-N Na
MIN 0.92 1.40 3.3
45.0
1.8 5.3 217
40 30.0 10.0
40 41 54 54
50
30
0.0

- - - - - - -
1'11 ron:.. , llil„j�Igr —434v ncCtly Crcck Rona -Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone]
Nem��� Metal Soil Test Report S1111111,h.."John%%kitirlyffioctl�,
5596'1'arbeel ltd. I
MEHLICH-3 EXTRACTION 1.1111111ertt1ll, NC 28358
Robeson ('ounty
Qlll.\I IIIIIY elllleel'llllll; I11C.4c 111,11lyses should lie referred to the Agl'lll ninle Division, Soll'restilig Secll(in
01 Nl Pb Se Cr Al
.1'mnple ('allntlnm Nickel Lead Selenlnm Chrombrnt rllundnnrrt
ll)
rng2lnr.i (ppm)
no 1
0,.111 0.40
D.00
0 00
020
002
0.ao 0.40
0.00
0 on
0.20
003
0.20 0.40
1.40
0:00
0.40
004
0.00 0.30
0.00
0.00
0.30
nos
0.10 0.40
0.20
0.00
0.30
000
0.00 0.10
4.20
0.00
0.30
Pe I
Repnrl 11: 35423
I.s
:Iccenlr

i f--� i-
REPOHT NOMUER: A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R 1.04-186 7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
SEND
TO: SBME (LUMBERTON)
ATTN: RICK BAKER
3718 OLD BATTLEGROUND RD
GREENSBORO NC 27410-2314
DAILOFHEPOH'r 04/16/99 PAGE 1
SAMPLES
GROWER: PON8506 JOB #1588-93-004 SUBMITTED
BY:
J M SMITH JR
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
i_-
�D
ACCT N 45591
S&ME (LUMBERTON)
DATE RECEIVED 04/13/99
DATE OF ANALYSIS 04/14/99
SAMPLE
LAB
Nitrogen
Phos-
phoPrus
Potassium
Sulfur
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Iron
Aluminum
Manganese
Copper
Zinc
Ammonia
Nitrate
N
K
S
Ca
Mg
Na
Fe
At
Mn
Cu
Zn
Nitrogen
Nitrogen
IDENT.
NO.
mgfkg
m9lkg
mgfkg
mgfkg
mpg
mpg
mgfkg
mgfkg
mpg
mgfkg
mpg'
mgfkg
mgfkg
mgfkg
001
17150
002
17151
003
17152
004
17153
005
17154
LAB
Cadmium
Chromium
Nickel
Lead
Arsenic
Mercury
Selenium
Organic
Total
Cd
Cr
NI
Pb
As
Hg
Se
Nitrogen
pH
C.E.C.
MO
NO.
mpg
mgfkg
mgfkg
mgfkg
mgfkg
mgfkg
mgfkg
mgfkg
(megMOgg)
PPM
17150
<0.01
1
MEHL
CH EX
RACT
17151
<0.01
< 1
17152
<0.01
1
17153
<0.01
< 1
17154
<0.01
< 1
This report p' s ly s ) tes mt�plesare
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of. our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made retained report
pp l t6 @@aayke� �@@r esr qq
to the work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. qgL EASTE AGRI IJ�L IiAL L BO A tES, INC.

L =--
REPORT NUMBER: A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R 104-1 B6 7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. [phone]
SEND
1-0. S&ME (LUMBERTON)
ATTN: RICK BAKER
371E OLD BATTLEGROUND RD
GREENSBORO NC 27410-2314
oAII (it HGPOfIT 04/16/99 PAGE 2
SAMPLES
SUBMITTED
GROWER: PO#8506 JOB #1588-93-004 BY:
J M SMITH OR
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
0
ACCT ED
S&ME (LUMBERTON)
DATE RECEIVED 04/13/99
DATE OF ANALYSIS 04/14/99
SAMPLE
LAB
Nitrogen
Phos•
Potassium
Sulfur
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Iron
Aluminum
Manganese
Copper
Zinc
Ammonia
Nitrate
N
phPus
K
S
Ca
Mg
Na
Fe
AI
Mn
Cu
Zn
Nitrogen
Nitrogen
[DENT.
NO.
mgtkg
mgtkg
mglkg
mpg
mpg
mglkg
mpg
mglkg
mglkg
nr lkg
mglkg
mglkg
mglkg
mgtkg
006
17155
LAB
Cadmium
Chromium
Nickel
Lead
Arsenic
Mercury
Selenium
Organic
Total
Cd
Cr
Ni
Pb
As
Hg
Se
Nitrogen
pH
C.E.C.
MO
NO.
mglkg
mglkg
rl
mglkg
mgtkg
mglkg
mglkg
mpg
(megl1009)
PPM
17155
<0.01
C 1
MEHL
CH EX
RACT
This re rt ap9g�t ly s (s1_te� mples ar
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced In whole or In part, nor may any reference be made retain d a ortp �to o' al r �ftjgr� r G
to the work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. A8L RRNN A RI L A {tE5 INC.
by
1

GERALD LEE FARM
SOIL SCIENTIST / AGRONOMIST REPORT
Soil Scientist / Agronomi t
/S�p SOIL SC�cc\
GF. fie, WILLC�
Q ,

GERALD LEE FARM (FIELD JL-2)
Field JL-2 of the Gerald Lee Farm is located approximately 1.5 miles west of Lumberton, at
_ Latitude 340 40' 33" N and Longitude 79' 05' 10" W and contains a total of 7.9 (3.9 net) acres
which are proposed as land application sites. The area surrounding the proposed field is
predominantly rural/residential and moderately populated. A field investigation was conducted by
an S&ME soil scientist/agronomist on the proposed field. Gerald Lee has another field (JL-1)
currently permitted in the program. This field is located across the highway (SR 1526) from the
i
_ proposed site.
Field JL-2
Field JL-2 has a total of 3.9 net acres. This field is currently established with coastal bermuda for
hay. The field is gently sloping towards adjacent tributaries, which drain to the northeast.
According to the soil scientist evaluation and the information in the Robeson County Soil Survey
obtained from the Natural Resource Conservation Service (Lumberton Field Office), soils in Field
JL-2 are classified as Norfolk and Wagram Series, with slopes ranging from 0 to 6 percent. This
field is well suited to the year around application of residual solids.
Both the soils and the crops should be able to assimilate the proposed loading of liquids, solids,
nitrogen, phosphorus, heavy metals, and salts known to be in the residual. This assessment is
based on the residual analysis provided, the planned application rate, proper crop management
guidelines and adherence to permit requirements. Soil pH should be maintained above 6.0 and at
levels to ensure optimal crop production. Nitrogen is considered the most limiting characteristic
of these residuals, however soil tests should be reviewed annually to identify any changes in the
nutrient status of the soil
Crop rotations and management practices should be evaluated prior to each application to
account for changes in the proposed crop rotation and land use objectives. Crop management
guidelines that will be of importance for this site will be:

S timing of application events with plant nutritional needs and periods of plant dormancy,
i
t
• split applications to prevent hydraulic overloading or nutrient leaching,
L , • performance of proper stabilization methods to fit crop and soil needs,
• establishment of suitable vegetative cover for currently forested agricultural sites,
• incorporation or injection of residual solids on fields that have a high incidence of
flooding,
• maintenance of proper vegetative cover on more sloping areas with runoff potential, and
L- • proper coordination between application events and crop harvesting.
The results of soil analysis for this field indicate no gross deficiencies in the fertility. By using
i
standard agricultural practices for the management of forage and crop production, the operator
should see significant benefits from the land application of residual solids. In turn, these well -
maintained fields should provide good assimilation of the plant available nutrients contained in the
residuals and afford an environmentally safe means of residual solids disposal and nutrient
recycling.
For each of the fields proposed, an investigation was conducted by an S&ME agronomist/soil
scientist. On -site observation confirms the information obtained from the Robeson County Soil
Survey.

AIorth Carolina Division of Environmental Management
L;
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF WASTEWATER RESIDUALS
[
// TOLPRIVATE LANDS
Permittee: 6117/�' Dr- ZanMl 9''4Q i
Contact Person: llzWd24'
Address of Permittee: _ /'nDi BDX /,:?cGA
Lt/,wr 6ee�o,� Ad. 28358
— Liszt of wastewater residuals to be applied to these lands: [ l_ , /[��Sit � �y�///�5�t, `, e/�
/< QYYKf G� l a64,,weler Y-,lom qlw- kw" k&(1710f as ee W-,-
Site ID Number: (§eraa kse Fill m
Field Number: F21� fL Z
Location of Land to be used for residual application (include map for each site):
Owner of Property used for residual application: oyedtol Z"g e
Lessee of Property (if appropriate):
Land use or cropping patterns: fly,, At 6e
Intended use or disposition of crops: lLGf3bYOG�' Yi3C
• r r r r r r r r r• r r r r r• r r• r r r r r r• r ''•//,,• +• r r r r r// r r r r r r r
The undersigned land owner or his representative hereby permits r�fG 1 64 OF LGG1yi0
hereinafterreferred to as the Permittee, to apply the above listed residuals onto the land at the location shown as
described herein in accordance with the restrictions and stipulations as given below. The landowner or his representative
receives; in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the Permittee receives, in
consideration, the use of the land described above for the disposal of wastewater residuals. This agreement shall remain
in effect for the length of the Division of Environmental Management land application permit and shall be renewed each
time the land application permit is renewed. The undersigned land owner or his representative and the Permittee agree to
abide with the following restrictions and stipulations until such time as written notification, given thirty (30) days in
advance, modifies or cancels this Land owner's Agreement.
Notification of cancellation of this agreement shall be immediately forwarded to:
it
Division of Environmental Management
Permits and Engineering Unit
s Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
FOR:NL• LARS 02195 Page 15 or IS
I

STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or
their representatives to inspect each parcel of property prior to, during, and after residual
application and to establish monitoring facilities on or near the application site as required by the
iresidual land application permit.
2. The landowner or his representative authorizes the Permittee, County and State Officials or their
representatives to take necessary soil, surface and ground water samples during the term of, and
twelve (12) months after termination of, this Agreement.
3. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with a copy of the land application
permit as issued by the N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resouces
(NCDEHNR) Division of Environmental Management (DEM) for the land described above prior
to commencement of residual application. The NCDEHNR-DE?vf permit will specify maximum
application rates, limitations and other restrictions prescribed by the laws and regulations.
4. The Permittee will provide each landowner or his representative with information and data
concerning the program for land application of residuals to privately owned lands which includes
an analysis of constituents of the residual, residual application methods and schedules for typical
cropping patterns and a description of the equipment used by the Permittee for residual application.
— 5. The Permittee will furnish each landowner or his representative with a copy of the results of each
soil analysis.
i
— 6. The site shall be adequately limed to a soil pH of at least 6.0 prior to residual application.
Residuals may be applied to sites with a pH of less than 6.0 provided a sufficient amount of lime is
also applied to achieve a final pH of the lime, residual and soil mixture of at least 6.0.
7. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to
the intended use and cropping patterns shown above prior to each planting season to enable the
Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule applications at appropriate periods. Within the
limits of the NCDEHNR-DElvf permit, the owner or his representative and the Permittee will
determine residual application rates and schedules based on crop patterns and the results of soil
samples.
8. Crops for direct human consumption shall be harvested in accordance with the conditions of the
permit.
9. The landowner or his representatives or successors shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement
for a period of eighteen (18) months from the date of the most recent residual application.
10. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee or Land Owner (Lessee) to control public
access to the land application sites during active site use and for the twelve (12) month period
following residual application. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the
activities being conducted at each site.
11. Specific residual application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on each site by the Permittee
or Land Owner (Lessee) prior to and during application.
FORM: LARS 02/95
Page 16 of 18

i
12. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land by a third
party, the landowner shall be responsible to insure the third party agrees and complies with the
terms and conditions of this Agreement.
13. The existing lessee, if any, of the site agrees, by execution of this Agreement, to comply with all
provisions of this Agreement.
14. This Agreement shall be binding on the grantees, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto
with reference to the subject matter of this Agreement.
15. Animals should not be grazed on residual applied lands within a thirty (30) day period following
the residual application. Application sites that are to be use for grazing shall have fencing that will
be used to prevent access during these periods after each application.
16. Prior to a transfer of land to a new owner, a permit modification must be requested and obtained
from the Division of Environmental Management. The request shall contain appropriate fees and
agreements. In addition, a notice shall be given by the current landowner to the new landowner
that gives full details of the materials applied or incorporated at each site.
17. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Environmental
Management may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or
place on or related to the application site and facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of
determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under
the terms and conditions of this permit; or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or
leachate.
18. The landowner shall not enter into any additional waste disposal contracts or agreements with
another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity for the land specified by this Agreement.
The land application of any additional wastewater residual sources, other than the residuals
specified by this permit, is prohibited.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Land Owner: 4"W Zee -
Address: 641y- /0 BD:r y2�/
Zat4j 7on,11L'. 29W8
Phone
(yio)S�!-y7�2Cw
FORM: LARS 02195
.Operator:
Address:
Phone No.:
Page 17 of 18
I

i
Zee
hereby grant permission to the Permittee to apply
L' NORTH CAROLINA,
have read this land owner's agreement and do
to my landsas specified herein.
Land Owner
3-4 - 9
Date
I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby certify that G'eZ44?0 U1, CE,e
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of /17AQGf Z¢ , 19 qq
NOTARY PUBLIC //
My commission expires �Z3�Z66 2-
SEAL:
ROBERT P 1WILLCOX JR
NOTARY PUBLIC GUILFORD COUNTY NC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
06.03.2002'
Js r s r s s s s r r s r r s r s a r s s s s s s r r r s r s r a r s s s s r r s s a s r a•
I� have read this land owner's agreement and do
—' hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee
Date
', r r r• r• r: r r a r• r r• r rs •• • r r s r a.• s•• a s a r s s a r a r a a• r r
i I
I, , IV T64aM Pff have reaeiand wner' agreement an ereby agree to
abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Permittee)
Date
FORM: LARS 02195 Page 18 of IS

. iRPR._ 5. 1999;1 3� lbrr�n tNV iKUfVI`1t1Y I NL I`1GM I FAX NO. 3382888080 'Nu • ""' r. r' rP 12
I
v
Tills form must be completed by the appropriate Regional OtIIee and included with the
submission of the application package.
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
In order to determine the classification of the watershed in which these land application activities will be
_ located, you are required to submit this form, with items 1 through 8 completed, to the appropriate Division of
i p Environmental Management Regional Warr Quality Supervisor (sec attached lis . At a miniratna, you must
include an 8.5' by 11' cop Ly of the portion of a 7S minute USGS Topographic gap which shows the subject
surface waters. You mast Identify the Iocation of the fatality and the Closest downslope surface waters (waters for
which you are requesting die classification) on the submitted may copy. The application may not be
submitted Until this form is completed and included with the submittal,
i . Applicant (please specify the name of the municipality, carparadon, individual, or other).
2. Name and Complete Address of Applicant: Ci7V
City: i" d Stara — mg zip: _ •?B3i8
Telephonc Number, ( 9ia ) l0 7/��3 Qc
3. Project Same. Q11Y eW eea vw Mwo AoAte.417ow
Nf JL-Z
4. Volume of tesiduals to be land applied: / 00 dry taps per yca
S. Name of closestsurface waters: k r-e-D z S 6w
6. Connty(s) When land application site is located, 6eE,o"
7. Map name
8. Applicant
TO.* REGIONAL WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification of The watershed where these land application activities will occtrr,
as idendfied on the attached map segment:
Name of surface waters. uj' .; +C- O 4(C 3xr0.iNCj' _
Classifeation (as established by the 1Environm=ml Management Commission):
Proposed Classification, if applicable,_ N /4
Sigaalum Of regional office personnel: R" • ujj ' Dare,
FORMt LARS 02/95
Page 9 of IS

34 T
/•
.e
9
•�,
°lon\_o
Mr yam
2
e
P •ter'?•
� i
,
ne
am
4
/
IMI
\
MM
O r
t
O
ILUMB
\
\
\
\ FIELD - JL-2
`q
I w
\
1"=I-2'mi
&ME
SITE MAP
Gerald Lee Farn\
FIGURE NO.
QQW
SDB
-. -'
1
Apr-99
CNNRONMENTAL SCRVICES • ENCMEERINC -TESTING
JOB NO.
1588-93-004 City of Lumberton

N
gerri
126
157 It
J
A
�Jaypit.4
It
It
51
A I
It
II
It
.'FIELD JL-2
152
15
X/24
1521
1513
/48
XIZ3
BP 125
-:-4
/49 Qs
-Rock ill
s: /Z cem _Z
?ark
550
aft
ch
15271
it
II
11
t
Low
USGS TOPO QUAD - NORTHWEST LUMBERTON, NC; CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 X"-
SCALE: 11, =z.000, City of Lumberton
CHECKED BY: 46V Gerald Lee Farm TOPO
DRAWN BY: SDB *S&ME Land Application Program MAP
DATE: Mn-99 JCB NO. 15&a-93-004 City Of Lumberton F19.2

5

SR 1526
i
FIELD - JL-2AA
(ADLACENT
FIELD
0PERMPCfED)
•
Legend
■
Dwelling N•IA Wooded Area
A
Structure (Bang) Dramagcw y
•
d
Pond == Aecesa Road
Well — -- Property Line
ANY
Buffer Arra x-x-x Fence
_
W
Wet Area 0 Hand Auger Baring
SCALE
I"-660'
*S8ME
LNNRUNNLNIAL SLNNLES • LNUNCLMNe • ItSTNO
City of Lumberton
Land Gerald Lee Farm
Application Program
BUFFER
MAP
Fiq. 5
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY: $DB
DATE Mar-99
doe No. 1588-93-004 CiN of Lumberton

i
L.�
GERALD LEE FARM
FIELD DATA SHEET
City of Lumberton
S&ME Inc. Project No.1588-93-004
FIELD NO.
FSA Ac
NET Ac
SOIL SERIES
CROP
JL - 2
7.9
3.9
Norfolk, Wagram
Coastal Hay
TOTAL
7.9
3.9
Map Symbol
I Soil Series
NoA
Norfolk
WaB
Wagram

I
SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATIONS
GERALD LEE FARM
CITY OF LUMBERTON
LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
S&ME Project No,1588-93-004
FARM
FIELD
NO.
COUNTY
SURFACE
WATERS
QUAD MAP
CLASSIFI-
CATION
Gerald Lee Farm
JL-2
Robeson
White Oak Branch
N.W.Lumberton, N.C.
WS - IV SW

11A_ on_T_Yis N1
_
_ t ..
0
Grower.• Lee, Gerald
Copies to: County Extension Director
Rt. 10 Box 424
S&ME Inc.
a=
Soil
Lumberton, NC 28358
Test
Report Farm:
S&M
Atin:Cecilecil Link
3718 Old Battleground Rd.
4/ 5 9 SERVING N.C. CITIZENS FOR OVER 50 YEARS Robeson County
Greensboro NC 27410
Agronomist Comments:
Manganese is low in the sample. Manganese will have be applied through a fertilizer application or you will see a yellow streaking on the.bermuda grass. The heavy metal concentration is well
within the limits of normal background levels and should pose no threat to crops grown on this land. Follow soil test recommendations for lime and fertilizer application.
T. Kent YarborouRh
-teld4a " orn►ation �`�
011 i�d �:i
�rRetBr
Sample No. Last Crop
Me Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime N A05 A0
Mg Cu Zn B Mn See Note
002 Berm Hay/Pas,M
1st Crop: Berm Hay/Pas,M .8T 180-220 0 130-150
0 0 0 $ 12
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CBC BP36
Ac pH , P-I K I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI (I)Mn-AI (2) Zn-I
Zn-Al Cu-I S-I SS-1 NCs-N AU-N Na
MIN 0.56 1.48 4.4 77.0
1.0 6.1 108 37 60.0 14.0 24 24 140
140 57 27 0.1

2% F — I1
Heavy Metal Soil Test Report Lee, Gerald
Rt. 10 Box 424
MEHLICH-3 EXTRACTION Lumberton, NC 28358
Robeson County
Questions concerning these analyses should be referred to the Agronomic Division, Soil Testing Section
Cd N1 Pb Se . Cr
Sample Cadmium Nickel Lead Selenium Chromium
ID mg/dm3 (ppm)
002
0.10
0.60
3.50
0.00
0.30
Report # 31851
Al As
Aluminum Arsenic
5.10

REPORT NUMBER: A&L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
R090-164 7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone] M94LA
Fax No. [phone]
SEND
TO: SAME (LUMBERTON)
ATTN: RICK BAKER
371E OLD BATTLEGROUND RD
GREENSBORO NC 27410-2314
DATEOFREPORT 04/02/99 PAGE 1
ACCT R 45591
SAMPLES
GROWER: PO#8469 JOBR1584-93-004suBMIrrEDBY: SAME (LUMBERTON)
GERALD LEE
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
DATE RECEIVED 03/30/99
DATE OF ANALYSIS 03/31/99
SAMPLE
LAB
Nitrogen
Phos-
phoms
Potassium
Sulfur '
Calcium.
Magnesium
.. Sodium
Iron
Aluminum
Manganese
Copper
Zinc
Ammonia
Nitrate
N
P
K
S ,,,
Ca :.
. Mg., ,
'; "mggrg
Na
Fe
AI
Mn
Cu
Zn
Nitrogen
Nitrogen
IDENT.
NO.
mgfkg
mgfkg
mglkg
mglkg; :
,';; mSfkg
. ,.
• mglkg
mglkg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mgfkg
mgfkg
mgfkg
mgfkg
002
09080
LAB
Cadmium
Chromium
Nickel
Lead
Arsenic
Mercury
Selenium
Organic
Total
Call
Cr
NI
Pb
As
Hg
. Se
Nitrogen
PH
C.E.C.
NO
NO.
mg*g
mgikg
mog
mg%g
mgikg
mglkg
' thglk9
mglkg
(meNtOOg)
PPM
09080
0.01
< 1
MEHL
CH EX
RACT
I II
This report p le(s) le . ample are
Our reports and falters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made relained a I {ygypp
to the work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. A&L EAS A 5 , INC.

APPENDIX A
RESIDUAL SOLIDS ANALYSIS REPORTS

CITY OF LUM 3ERTON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
NUTRIENT AND METAL ANALYSIS

CITYOF LUNMERTON
LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
RESIDUALS ANALYSIS
Residual Type: Wastewater
Treatment Plan
Date Sampled:
1112199
Date Reported:
1/20/99
I
Permit No. W00000672
% Solids: 3.32
i)H: 7.2
- MAI. . .
......... .
A
H
Nitrogen (TKN)
5.660
56,600.000
113.200
Phosphows
2.340
23,400.000
46.800
Potassium
0.480
4,800.000
9.600
PAN (injected)*
1.908
19,080.000
38.160
PAN (surface)*
1.758
17,580.000
35.160
Ammonia Nitrogen
0.300
3,000.000
6.000
Calcium
2.250
22,500.000
45.000
Calcium Carbonate Eq.
-
-
Magnesium
0.350
3,500.000
7.000
Sodium
0.960
9,600.000
19.200
Sulfate
0.069
, 690.000
1.380
Nitrate N + Nitrite N
-
<10.000
0.000
Manganese
-
209.000
0.418
Chloride
-
4,090.00
8.180
Iron
-
11,900.00
23.800
Aluminum
-
31,500.000
63.000
Arsenic
-
1.610
0.003
Cadmium
-
<1.000
0.000
Chromium
-
322.000
0.644
Copper
-
364.000
0.728
Lead
-
57.000
0.114
Mercury
-
1.140
0.002
o ybdenum
-
20.000
0.040
Nickel
-
20.000
0.040
Selenium
-
2.090
0.004
Zinc
-
199.000
0.398
A&L Eastem Laboratories Report No.: ROOI-168
*Determination of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN):
Injected Application: 1.908 % PAN
(Mineralization Rate)(TKN-Ammonia N) + Ammonia N + Nitrate N + Nitrite N = % PAN
Surface Application: 1.758 % PAN
(Mineralization Rate)(TKN-Ammonia N) + (0.5)(Ammonia N) + Nitrate N + Nitrite N = % PAN
Prepared by S&ME, Inc. 1/27/99

A & L EASTERN AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 • [phone]
Fax No. (804� 271 6446
R001-168 ACCOUNT 4559e F'A E 1
REPOHT NUMBER
S&ME ( LUMBERTON)
ATTN: RICK BAKER
3710 OLD BATTLEGROUND RD
GREENSBORO NC 27410-2314
LAB NUMBER = 40176
SAMPLE ID = WASTEWATER SLUDGE
PO #e240 JOB #15BB-93-004
SLUDGE ANALYSIS REPORT
DETECT1 ON
RESULT RESULT LIMIT
PARAMETER ( '/. ) (MG/KB) (MG/KB)
�P tDo
ROB WILLCOX
DATE SAMPLED
DATE RECEIVED 01/14/99
DATE REPORTED 01/20/99
ANALYSIS
ANALYST DATE METHOD REFERENCE
SI:ILIDS(AS IS) 3.32 33200 100 KCS 01/14/99 SM 2540G
NITROGEN( TK:N) 5. 66 56600 100 KCS 01/15/99 EPA 351.3
PHOSPHORUS 2.34 23400 100 KM 01/15/99 EPA 365.4
POTASSILIM 0.48 4800 100 JChf 01/15/99 SW 846-6010
CALCIU1%1 2.25 22500 100 JCM 01/15/99 SW 846-6f�10
MAGNF-SI 1.II1 0.35 3500 100 JCM 01 /15/99 SW 846-6010
SODI LIhI 0. 96 9600 100 JCM 01/15/99 SW B46-6010
IRON 11900 1 JCM 01/15/99 SW 846-6010
ALUHI NLII`1 31500 10 JCM 01/15/99 SW B46• 6010
MANGANESE 209 1 JCM 01/15/99 SW B46-6(-J10
COPPER 364 1 JCP1 01/15/99 SW 846•-6010
ZINC 199 1 JCM 01/15/99 SW 846•-6010
AMMONIA -NITROGEN 0.30 3000 .100 KCS 01/15/99 EPA 350.2
NO3-NO2 NITROGEN ND 10 KCS 01/15/99 SM 4500-NO3 F
CADMIUM ND I DCH 01/15/99 SW 846--7131A
CHRO1111U l 322 5 JCM 01/15/99 SW 846•-6010
NI Ck.EL- 20 5 JCI°I 01/15/99 SW 846-601 o
LEAD 57 5 JChf 01/15/99 SW 846--6010
ALL VALUES ARE ON A DRY WEI GHT BASIS EXCEPT AS NOTED. " UWACHCU
hl1:IRMAh Jul`lEf
Ow 1oi)urls and Inters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any relorenco he Matto to Ihu
wud,. Ih,; iu>ulle, ur Ihu company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written aulhmization. Copynghl i u//

1
A & L EASTERN
AGRICULTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine
Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 •
[phone]
Fax No. [phone]
A
Rf:Ii 11-160
ACCOUNT 4559�
PA6)E 2
S
HFPORT NUMBER
St. -ME
(LUMBERTON)
PO #8240 JOB #1588-93-004
ROB WILLCOX
ATTN:
RICK: BAKER
3718
OLD BATTLEGROUND RD
GREENSBORO NC 27410-2314
SLUDGE ANALYSIS REPORT
DATE SAMPLED
LAB NUMBER = 40176
DATE RECEIVED 01/14/99
SAMPLE ID = WASTEWATER SLUDGE
DATE REPORTED 01/20/99
DETECTION
RESULT
RESULT LIMIT
ANALYSIS
PARAMETER
( % )
(MG/KG) ( MG/KG) ANALYST
DATE
METHOD REFERENCE
ARSENIC
1.61 6.4 KM
01/18/99
SW 846•-7061A
MERCURY
1.14 0.1 KM
01 /1 B/99
SW 846-74 71 A
SELENIUM
2.09 0.1 KM
01 / 16/99
SW 846--7741 A
PH ( STD. UIVI TSB AS
I S) 7.20
RD
01/15/99
EPA 150. 1
ORGANIC NITROGEN
5.36
53600 100 DCH
01/15/99
CALCULATION
MuLYBDENUM
20 5 JCM
01/15/99
SW 846-60Io
CHLORIDE
4090 1 AB
01/15/99
SM 4500.-CL D
SLILf=ATE
690 10 JCM
01/15/99
SW 846--9i138
ALL. VALLIES ARE ON A DRY WEI BHT BASIS EXCEPT AS NOTED. " L 1 1/�eL
C. H. CHID Vv L. hJORf IA JOhIE
Oie sgwtI4 awl lelwrs are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference he made to thu
wuI6. Ihu wsulls, 01 1110 company in any advertising, news release, of other public announcements wilhout obtaining our prior wrillen aulhorizanon. Copy,igl I I El /

CITY OF LUM 3ERTON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
TCLP ANALYSIS

ANALYTICAL REPORT
Rob Wilcox
12/23/1998
S&ME, INC.
3718 Old Battleground Rd.
Greensboro, NC 27410
TestAmerica Job Number:
98.03083
Matrix Type:
SLUDGE
Client Project ID: 1588-93-004
98L-10174
� MPLE NO. SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
DATE -TIME
SAMPLED
L866 LUMBERTON WWTP
12/07/1998
02:00
Rep.
Date
lnalyte Method
Result
Limit
Units
Flags
Analyzed
�..y Weight
89
%
12/17/1998
Zorrosivity (pH)
7.08
S.U.
12/23/1998
1 Utability (Flash Point)
>200
Degree F
12/23/1998
2 's/TCLP Extraction
Complete
12/13/1998
F'60B TCLP LL 8260B
1 ,P-Benzene
<0.05
0.05
mg/L
12/16/1998
1 ,P-Carbon tetrachloride
<0.05
0.05
mg/L
12/16/1998
CCLP-Chlorobenzene
<10.0
10.0
mg/L
12/16/1998
C-7,P-Chloroform
<0.60
0.60
mg/L
12/16/1998
1', .,P-1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<0.75
0.75
mg/L
12/16/1998
L_�P-1,2-Dichloroethane
<0.05
0.05
mg/L
12/16/1998
CCLP-1,1-Dichloroethee
<0.07
0.07
mg/L
12/16/1998
1; ¢P-2-Butanone (MEK)
<20.0
20.0
mg/L
12/16/1998
1
<0.07
0.07
mg/L
12/16/1998
,,,P-Tetrachloroethene
L". P-Trichlorcethene
<0.05
0.05
mg/L
12/16/1998
CCLP-Vinv1 chloride
<0.02
0.02
mg/L
12/16/1998
i 2R: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
91.0
%
12/16/1998
?, IR: Toluene-d8
106
%
12/16/1998
3URR: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
71.0
%
12/16/1998
L
Page 2 of 7

ANALYTICAL REPORT
Rob Wilcox 12/23/1998
S&ME, INC.
3718 Old Battleground Rd.
Greensboro, NC 27410
TestAmerica Job Number:
98.03083
Matrix Type:
SLUDGE
Client Project ID: 1588-93-004
98L-10174
SAMPLE NO. SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
DATE -TIME
SAMPLED
1866 LUMBERTON WWTP
12/07/1998
02:00
Rep.
Date
'malyte Method
Result
Limit
Units
Flags
Analyzed
3___, COMPOUNDS - TCLP 8270C
DMx10
'CLP-1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<0.75
0.75
mg/L
12/15/1998
.P-2,4-Dinitrotaluene
<0.013
0.013
mg/L
12/15/1998
: P-Hexachlorobenzene
<0.013
0.013.
mg/L
12/15/1998
:.. P-Hexachlorobutadiene
<0.050
0.050
mg/L
12/15/1998
:CLP-Hexachloroethane
<0.30
0.30
mg/L
12/15/1998
,P-Nitrobenzene
<0.20
0.20
mg/L
12/15/1998
i ,P-Pyridine
<0.50
0.50
mg/L
12/15/1998
'CLP-Cresol
<20.0
20..0
mg/L
12/15/1998
'r'-T,P-o-Cresol
<10.0
10.0
mg/L
12/15/1998
:.. ,P-m+p-Cresol
<10.0
10.0
mg/L
12/15/1998
7_,P-Pentachlorophenol
<10.0
10.0
mg/L
12/15/1998
'CLP-2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
<40.0
40.0
mg/L
12/15/1998
:-7,P-2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
<0.20
0.20
mg/L
12/15/1998
i� M: Nitrobenzene-d5
74
%
12/15/1998
!:-!R: 2-Flucrobiphenyl
76
&
12/15/1998
iURR: Phenol-d5
54
12/15/1998
i'. R: 2-Fluorophenol
61
12/15/1998
i', 'R: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol
45
%
12/15/1998
:'c;,P Semivolatile Leaching 1311
Complete
12/11/1998
'CLP-BNA extraction 3520
i I
Complete
12/13/1998
7f Dilution factor due to sample matrix interference
Page 3 of 7

ANALYTICAL REPORT
Rob Wilcox 12/23/1998
S&ME, INC.
3718 Old Battleground Rd.
Greensboro, NC 27410
TestAmerica Job Number: 98.03083 Matrix Type: SLUDGE
Client Project ID: •1588-93-004 98L-10174
07tMPLE NO. SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
,866 LUMBERTON WWTP
DATE -TIME SAMPLED
12/07/1998 02:00
Rep.
Date
malyte Method
Result
Limit
Units Flags
Analyzed
e,..dTICIDES - TCLP 8081
CCLP-Chlordane
<0.003
0.003
mg/L
12/15/1998
[ P-Endrvn
<0.002
0..002
mg/L
12/15/1998
[ ,P-Heptachlor/Hept. Epoxide
<0.008
0.008
mg/L
12/15/1998
CCLP-Lindane
<0.005
0.005
mg/L
12/15/1998
C^T,P-Methoxychlor
<0.005
0.005
mg/L
12/15/1998
: P-Toxaphene
<0.010
0.010
mg/L
12/15/1998
i ,R: DBC
74
%
12/15/1998
7 73ICIDES - TCLP 8151
DMX5
,P-2,4-D
<1.0
1.0
mg/L
12/15/1998
.`=�P-2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
<0.10
0.10
mg/L
12/15/1998
iURR: DCPA
0
% NS
12/15/1998
,P Herbicide Extraction
Complete
12/13/1998
�,P Pesticide Extraction
Complete
12/13/1998
Dilution factor due to sample matrix interference
= No surrogate standard percent recovery due to a sample dilution.
Page 4 of 7

TestAmerica
I N CO NP ON A T EO
FINAL REPORT OF ANALYSES
TESTAMERICA, INC-LUMBERTON PROJECT NAME: S&ME 9BL-10174
2003 N. PINE STREET REPORT DATE: 12/22/98
SUITE 2
LUMBERTON, NC 28358-
•Attn: PAM HESTER
SAMPLE NUMBER- 131449 SAMPLE ID- LUMBERTON WWTP SAMPLE MATRIX- SO
DATE SAMPLED- 12/07/98 TIME SAMPLED- 1400
DATE RECEIVED- 12/09/98 SAMPLER- ROB WILLCOX RECEIVED BY- DHT
TIME RECEIVED- 0858 DELIVERED BY- COURIER
Page 1 of 1
ANALYSIS
TOX. CHAR. LEACHING PROCEDURE
ARSENIC, TOTAL
CADMIUM, TOTAL
CHROMIUM, TOTAL
MERCURY, TOTAL
'SELENIUM, TOTAL
SILVER, TOTAL
BARIUM, TOTAL
I .LEAD, TOTAL
SAMPLE PREP ANALYSIS
METHOD DATE BY DATE BY RESULT UNITS
6010 12/19/98 LJP 12/22/98 LJP
6010
< 0.010
mg/l
6010
< 0.005
mg/l
6010
0.006
mg/l
6010
0.0002
mg/l
6010
0.012
mg/l
6010
0.015
mg/1
6010
0.335
mg/l
6010
0..011
mg/l
P4,
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
n (
NC DEHNR DEM #47
NC DEHNR DW #37717
SC DEHC #99015
122 LYMAN STREET / AS1IEVILLE, NC 28801 / 828-254-5169 / FAX: [phone]
DET.
LIMIT

I
lJ TestL America
INC OR P 0 H ATE D
FINAL REPORT OF ANALYSES
TESTAMERICA, INC-LUMBERTON PROJECT NAME: S&ME 1588-93
2003 N. PINE STREET REPORT DATE: 01/05/99
SUITE 2
LUMBERTON, NC 28358-
Attn: PAM RESTER
_ SAMPLE NUMBER- 132016 SAMPLE ID- LUMBERTON WWTP SAMPLE MATRIX- SO
DATE SAMPLED- 12/07/98 TIME SAMPLED- 1400
'DATE RECEIVED- 12/22/98 SAMPLER- ROB WILCOX RECEIVED BY- DHT
TIME RECEIVED- 1142 DELIVERED BY- FED EX
Page 1 of 1
ANALYSIS DET.
ANALYSIS METHOD DATE BY RESULT UNITS LIMIT
REACTIVE CYANIDE SW 846 01/05/99 APT <10 mg/kg 10
REACTIVE SULFIDE SW 846 01/04/99 APT 94.6 MG/KG 4.0
t
LABORATORY DIRECTOR
NC DEHNR DEM #47
NC DEHNR DW #37717
SC DEHC #99015
122 LYMAN STREET / ASHEVILLE. NC 28801 / 828-254-3169 / Fi.C: 828-252-97I I

__` a -- -
Chain of ulslntly Hecorrl `� I �r��l�f1 ��_ _ ■ qq� _Page--L of
(.1 Asheville, NC n NunTuss. GA n 1•hadulle, NC n Franklurl KY - --- - n Muoisville, N(' -- -- _-..
(8281 254-5169 [phone] (71N 1.192-1 164 (502) 223 11251 0) Of .1811 9697
Iminlicnun, NC n Lcxinganl.SC n Illightuu,C'l) n Macon. 0A 1-1 Od:mdu, Pl.
'JI1)) 718 6190 (811.1) 796-8989 (107) 659dN97 (9121 757-0811 (4117) HS I.25611
Client: S [ MEN TArC •
I';ulccl No.: 1588 -93 -QQ ¢
y8L —1617 q RIsQUI:S7'I:I) 1'AItAMI's'I'I:ItS
Repurl AlilIress:
OLU iwar-GCdo-o ,e0.
Invoice Addmsx:
.SA"N6
LAR (_C)_IIL-1..
A = Asheville, NC
1: = ch:lcNC
1)= Uenver.Cr,Co
E = Luxinglon. SC
G = Macon,GA[396�
K = Frankfurt, KY
Q I- = Iunubcrunl, M
(LV Ivl = Ivlorrisville, N
17 N= Norcrpss. GA
V 0 = 01 hnulu, FI.
/S}v S = Sahc(plracled
{�
—A3_ZI
(akE6d(:Taea NC. 2741a
Attn: 266 YV/ 114.L O)C'
Ann:
I'lunm No.KK.. t
S:un lcIIy°
fax "n.: (33G� 2B8 -B`iB0
ItO. Nn:
` I Slal¢S:unplcs Collected '1'111tNA12011ND'1'1611i �lQ41D
h
n 24 I lours n 48 Ilnnrs I a_ a3 8^,p; J�
n 5 Pays 11) Days Ihue "Celled:_—_
Sangde IU
Ualc
*['line1�0011't
1'rub
hlalrlx
Cnnblhlc .
N/q
F- 1'nscn•.
REMARKS
LC! BEE N %V
12 7
2:00
G RB
06E
Za
GMOEQ7aN WTP
iz?
2:30
6RA8
quorg
3
X
Lab Use Only Custody Seal: Oyes ON, LANIA
fall Lub7ernp.
rrc-�
Bee. Lab
�
COAIMEN'r5:
'� -1•.cAijde --4 ir a+ +' Nis
- p — %IVi%4 D►��[t �r
�JJ a
IldimplishcJ By:
.G ld
Relinquished fly:
Rrrimpii,hed II --
Ua 'line
1 �%oa
Time
Pane ''role
Received R
Received Ry:� /
Received fly:
Itcrviv;vl nv:
c Time
7 98_��QQ_
kn • i m
I l:nr 'I'iuv
Lab Use 0 y:
�

CITY OF LUMBERTON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION

ANNUAL PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION FORM
Facility Name City of Lumberton Permit Number A00000672
WWTP Name Lumberton WWTP NPDES # NCO024571
Monitoring Period: From 7/1/98 To 9/30/98
Pathogen Reduction (40 CFR 50332) — Please indicate level achieved and alternative performed
Class A
Alternative I Alternative 2 Alternative 3
Alternative 4 Alternative 5 Alternative 6
Class B X
Alternative 1 X Alternative 2 Alternative 3
If applicable to alternative performed (Class B only) indicate " Process To Significantly Reduce Pathogens ".
X Aerobic Digestion Air Drying Anaerobic Digestion Compostiog _Lime Stabilization
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A or Class B) complete the following monitoring data:
Allowable
Pathogen Density
Number of
Frequency
Sample
Analytical
Parameter
Level in Sludge
Exceedenea
of Analysis
Type
Technique
Minimum
Average
Maximum
I Units
Fecal
2 x 10 MPN
Col'tform
per gram of total
solids art x 10'
ofr grant
ttootaall solids
o X 1oa
597 X 10'
3.1 X 10'
CFU/gram
-0-
Quarterly
Caah
MF
1000 MPN
per gram of
total solid
(dry weight)
Salmonella
3 MPN per
bacteria Cm
grams total wild.
lieu of fecal
(dryweight)
coliform)
Vector Attraction Reduction (40 CFR 50333) —Please indicate option performed
Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 X Option 5
Option 6 Option 7 Option 8 Option _ Option 10
No vector attraction reduction options were performed
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (please check the appropriate statement)
X " I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32 and the vector
attraction reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33 have been met."
" I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32 and the vector
attraction reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33 have not been met." ( Please note if you check this statement attach an
explanation why you have not met one or both of the requirements.)
"This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that
qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen and vector attraction
reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including fine and
imprisonment."
Howard Revels, Chief Operator - WWTP
Preparer Name and Title (type or print)
Signature ofPreparer ate
Land Applier Name and Title (if applicable) (type or print)
Signature of Land Applier (if applicable) Date
DEM FORM RF (10/94)

VIC4 Y (Sd4 v ) P,,o/
CSu ('�.c
Fo V. Ins -2 -e.. (< 7F', 4 / 9 P — 7" w ! 1 Y S
F u
Lo Sou✓ ,�
2S�2-(vS.9(o
ct.cfo2S CQ
l�/f8
31,1/0
,2
��(g4
t7/NY7.o9
3go
?5}'-,— 33
3�y�
3/� ZS o
�f• � sit 9 ; 2�
1'f
0
D 2..
LA c
7 -
f Al
59 7 0.3 S

-V .1
- - - - - - - - - - -

DATE: -7U 9 ?
DAY: Lk/-etm R r a
PUBLIC UTLITIES LAB
CITY OF .LUMBERTON
WASTE TREATMENT PLANT
TOTAL SOLIDS ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
Elm #
VOLUME (ML)
TARE WEIGHT (GR-)
TARE + SAMPLE WEIGHT (GR.)
1)
13 d.„
1) y
7)
1)
9 v
2)
2)
2)
2)
3)
Sa 1, AS
3) 24
3)
o a 9
3)
s 3 i o
4)
4)
4)
4)
5)
5)
5)
5)
6)
6)
6)
6)
TOTAL SOLIDS (GR.)
TOTAL
SOLIDS (MG/0
1)
ll
ll
2) '7./, 7 0Sy 8
2)
2) --
3)
3)
3)
4) ? / 2 a `f 7
4)
gS`99
4) 1S'
5) ;'
5)
5)
6)
6)
6)
TOTAL MUFFLED WEIGHT (GR)
TOTAL FIXED SOLIDS (GRJ
TOTAL FIXED SOLIDS (MG )
a 1)
1)
1)
2)
2)
2)
i 3)
3)
3)
_
4)
4)
4)
5)
5)
5)
6)
6)
6)
JALYST:
,.ALCULATED BY:
"-IECKED BY: P . 4-9Y
TOTAL
VOLATILE SOLIDS (MG/i_)
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS
STARTED:
DATE:
TIME: /sus
E-7
DATTELETEZ.2 / J7/
1)
12)
3)
4)
6)
r� �o TIME: � ysS

!.;
:t:
•:i is ;'vr_.r
.r

STY OF LUMBERTON, N.C.
iRASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
",BORATORY WORKSHEET
L COLIFORM ANALYSIS
DAY 6 DATE -7/(p_//
ANALYST
TIME COLLECTED
V 'SET J"t -7/11 7 1p (?-
SLUDGE ANALYSES
mples 1 Dilution B(.01) g ml Filtered ya Colonies Counted
2 Dilution B(.O1)_5'ml Filtered, Colonies Counted
3 Dilution C(.001)�_ml Filtered /j� Colonies Counted
me Started: / 30Analyst
me Completed.rz.5� Analyst_L.
uoliform Colonies/g= 2 S t
�titial DO rL `Z
Minute I /
2 Minute 7. D
Minute 6�9
4 Minute /_ Q
Minute
Minute
7 Minute �.
Minute &- L_
OXYGEN CONSUMPTION RATE
Initial Temperature 2 S,(
Final Temperature .2.Lf� e c
4v ,7--. 2'6p°c
9 Minute
10 Minute (p,
11 Minute �, O
12 Minute
13 Minute
14 Minute S
15 Minute S

L5,
Sr�'l e5
�7 d /
5 y;1 O—L Y I
6
Cy2 °Z�s��-e
z
f,o^����a goal' 38�
0 o % X 7�]
°e Cj I ` n_�9 •1' b�' j / �T = o l k i �. 1 .n.. �f/1' = S ?°; I %%' .6

DATE:z-Y
DAY: Zv G-
CITY OF LUMBERTON
PUBLIC UTLITIES LAB WASTE TREATMENT PLANT
TOTAL SOLIDS ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
*
VOLUME (ML)
TARE WEIGHT (GR-)
TARE +
SAMPLE VEIGHT (GR.) -
�J
3)
1)
2)
3)
1)
2)
3)
/. 7 6, CC0
1)
2)
3)
/. -7 7 (a Cv
4)
4)
Y. 6 I
4)
/to . 70 qgot-
5)
i)
5)
6)
5)
6)
S�,ot9t�
5)
6)
TOTAL SOLIDS (GR.)
TOT
SO IDS (nc/ )
�)
1)
1)
L)
7 !. 7 7 it (s
2)
—
'2)
'.D
3)
3)
.1) .
b 5 Co G Er
4)
?
4)
.-
5)
5)
)
6)
6)
TOTAL
MUFFLED WEIGHT (GR)
TOTAL FIXED SOLIDS (GR.)
TOTAL
FIXED SOLIDS
U
1)
1)
--2)
2)
2)
5)
3)
3)
4)
4)
4)
-,5)
5)
5)
`6)
6)
6)
TOTAL VOLATILtS00LIDtS(tmG/0
1)
2)
`'ALYST: L^
.-,ICULATED BY: 6-= %
r"ECKED BY: -7-,2-7 -iR
ANALYSIS
'STARTED:
DATE: f F
TIME: I Lf s o
3)
4)
5)
'
ANALYSIS
COMPLETED:
DATE:? Z F ZE R-
6)
TIME: /S `�

ITY OF LUMBERTON, N-C.
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
,--ABORATORY WORKSHEET
SLUDGE ANALYSES
:CAL COLIFORM ANALYSIS
DAY & DATE T1 eS cc
ANALYST_-�
TIME COLLECTEDtT
-1/1.71
imples 1 Dilution B(.01) 0 ml Filtered 3 3�lonies Counted
2 Dilution B(_01) Z_ml Filtered �� Cl�lonies Counted
3 Dilution C(.001) , ml Filtered_f2✓Colonies Counted
.me Started: /yy SD Analyst Lr'-2
.me Completed:4SF7 Analyst
t.�aliform Colonies/ = 3 / Z1 0
iitial DO 8,
Minute
Z Minute��
Minute
¢Minute . 3
Minute
E Minute
7 Minute ez,O
Minute '7.3
OXYGEN CONSUMPTION RATE
Initial Temperature 2� I
Final Temperature 2.3.5 °L
9 Minute��
10 Minute
11 Minuted
12 Minute 7,�f
13 Minute
14 Minute_�z
15 Minute �•
SP Cc-, (/e u l �-" 6- --- 'ac---c..f�P
Soar,

iwlI. cars j K io v
43-5 lx (ov
Sd. 2.3
=3JL�o
E
2-0 C. 00 1 x �. b J 3� e. FU��/'n,^•
/Zo
ism
7-o7Qi
$zz,7
—So H ✓ _ l 07
Spud = -� -� �IOZ/�

_ DATE:
=?
f � DAY: sat
i
CITY OF LUMBERTON
PUBLIC UTLITIES LAB WASTE TREATMENT PLANT
i TOTAL SOLIDS ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
5 #
VOLUME (ML)
TARE WEIGHT (GR.)
TARE
+ SAMPLE WEIGHT (GR.)
1)
1)
1)
1)
2)
2) — 2
2)
2)
3)
3)
3)
3)
4)
qs
4) Sa.,�
4)
3 7 3 7
4)
/ S; c o 0 0
5)
5) s
5)
5)
5)
6)
6)
So. 62 13 2
6)
TOTAL SOLIDS (GR.)
TOTAL SOLIDS (nr./ )
1)
1)
1)
2) 67 5
Se z Z /
2)
—
2)
—
3)
3)
3)
S) :'
S)
5)
6)
6)
TOTAL MlJFFLED NEIGHT (GR)
TOTAL FIXED SOLIDS (GR.)
TOTA
FIXED SOLIDS
L)
1)
1)
2)
2)
2)
-4)
4)
4)
>)
5)
5)
-)
6)
6)
L✓
, LYST- w-r-1
� CULATED BY: i ,-9>
;uFCKED BY: 7-2-7-17'
,I
ANALYSIS STARTED:
DATE: 71 -7/ w
TIME: I s t o
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
DATE: -7 /T I r
TIME: 1 s3 1

U __ _1J

;TY OF LUMBER'TON, N.C.
1ASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
BORATORY WORKSHEET
SLUDGE ANALYSES
:AL COLIFORM ANALYSIS
DAY 6 DATEre4,
ANALYST
TIME COLLECTED
mples 1 Dilution B(.01) 9 ml Filtered �d CltfLonies Counted
2 Dilution B(.Ol) $ ml Filtered: olonies Counted
3 Dilution C(.001) 2 ml Filtered'T.vc-Colonies Counted
me Started: 143s Analyst wr,2
me Completed:/tfyw Analyst
oiiform Colonies/g= a 7/ O
i � itial DO G.
linute
L Minute
1
linute U
Minute
-.linute
T�
J /
linute
S.
Minute
S, S
linute Z, 1
OXYGEN CONSUMPTION RATE
9 Minute S 3
10 Minute S, 2
11 Minute s,
12 Minute_S, 0
13 Minute_ 91
14 Minute_
15 Minute c
Initial Temperature 2 q,���
Final Temperature 25. o °L
0
.i-� f• Q L
50vor;

r
----------------
[;^� _ C{{ L•
C�:vi
.M-,7 s b _
zC)r),
_ / � m � •L7C --^'aw O al %� .f'-r.� %2g J /�..,.v � 1 1 ' � ..� �n Q s
L'
-alb s}�;I Qs l ou a'l
ems/
1/7
_ AZZ _`.
oo��
n1 X -3 f
n
�3 h�7
/40
h 5
S"'��
r
frm
r
L�I
'r n'7� /�f/
J p0)X $ J )'N

DATE: 7/
DAY: b.ze,41 -
CITY OF LUMBERTON
PUBLIC UTLITIES LAB WASTE TREATMENT PLANT
TOTAL SOLIDS ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
:WEF� tam #
VOLUME (ML)
TARE WEIGHT (GR.)
TARE + SAMPLE WEIGHT (GR.)
1)
ll
1)
1)
2)
H
2) —
2) 7 0 7
2) /.. 7 0 7 9
3)
3)
3)
3)
4)
4) moo,.
4) 70. 2Vz S
4) //�. o S
5)
5)
5)
5)
6)
6)
6) ?, q Z
6)
TOTAL SOLIDS (GR.)
TOT ) SOLIDS (M�/
1)
1)
1)
2) 1. -1 6 1
2) _
2) —
3)
4) -2 7 SC
3)
4) 3 3 �
3)
4) l o
1�6)
6)
6)
TOTAL MUFFLED WEIGHT (GR)
TOTAL FIXED SOLIDS (GR-)
TOTAL FIXED SOLIDS (
1)
1)
1)
J 2)
2)
2)
'3)
3)
3)
4)
4) .4)
15)
5)
5)
6)
6)
6)
'VLYST:
-,uLCULATED BY: n-
Q,,ECKED BY:� 1-al-9?'
TOTAL -VOLATILE SOLIDS (MG/0
ANALYSIS STARTED:
DATE:
TIME: 15,00
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
DATE: • -7 19_/tg
1)
2)
3)
4)
5?
6)
TIME: /5y �-

---<:ITY OF LUMBERTON, N.C.
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
.ABORATORY WORRSBEET
SLUDGE ANALYSES
_ECAL COLIFORM ANALYSIS
DAY 6 DATE eqA. 7t4iy
ANALYST IZ
TIME COLLECTED r3 Q- o
amples 1 Dilution B(_01) ml Filtered V d Conies Counted
2 Dilution B(_O1) �" ml Filtered,�S olonies Counted
3 Dilution C(.001)4-p ml Filtered T-,vLColonies Counted
ime Started: 143s Analyst Qr,,
.ime Completed;/cfL)o Analyst
;^ f
i
Coliform Colonies/g= a r/� 7. O
'initial DO la .
Minute {p, `)-
I
21 Minute ,
Lj Minute U
:Minute T�
Minute T �%
Minute S (u
7 Minute S, S
,Minute C,
OXYGEN CONSUMPTION RATE
Initial Temperature q. i-G
Final Temperature 2S, 0 e`
9 Minutes. J
10 Minute S, 21
11 Minute S, /
12 Minute s, U
13 Minute
14 Minute
15 Minute(
S-Cea -(cc'(c-� �34 c-
0-F- e-L�- �" f 4fAo�z�� a^
S 0 v`r-,

r', pV• C�rs�Xlo�
33/�
GL�GrI�
_ 1,?9
X
k+ -4 *�. CCAVS
L 9,
If Zg�
or�
'.4,
2-74/L ZTe7
SO to y 6j-,L\ e K- LanS-L'Cv'
o S (z°
8 � f- �S CZo _�-�• � )
?gr2
oZ x= x e
Ta / sal ct
Soar
(s (p Z
So�V
i „

DATE: -/f
DAY: w-ea,� e5dQ u
CITY OF LUMBERTON
PUBLIC UTLITIES LAB WASTE TREATMENT PLANT
TOTAL SOLIDS ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
r= #
VOLUME (ML)
TARE WEIGHT (GR.)
TARE + SAMPLE WEIGHT (GR.)
ll
1)
1)
1)
2)
H
2) —
2)
z o 7
2) (.
7 o 7 9
3)
3)
3)
3)
4)
T H
4) moo..
4)
70, 2Yz S
4) //7,
&7o S
5)
5)
5)
5)
6)
6)
6)
Z149, 4' 2 g
6)
DRIED WEIGUI (GR
TOTAL SOLIDS (GR.)
TOTAL
SOLIDS (MG/ )
1)
1)
1)
2) 1, -1 6 -1 1 Y
2)
_-
21 —
'3)
3)
3)
4) -2 75-G
4)
331
4) t8 66�""
5) :`
5)
5)
j6)
6)
6)
TOTAL MUFFLED WEIGHT (GR)
TOTAL FIXED SOLIDS (GR.)
TOTAL FIXED
SOLIDS (Me )
,2)
2)
2)
)
3)
3)
4)
4)
4)
i5)
5)
5)
6)
6)
6)
_'
IALYST: w
6ALLCULATED BY:
+IECKED BY: 1-Q-I-9r
—
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS (MG/0
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS
STARTED:
DATE:
TIME: lS��
COMPLETED:
DATE: z1 9 / 19
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
TINE: /5c/ �-

;TY OF LUMBERTON, N.C.
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
"IBORATORY WORRSHEET
SLUDGE ANALYSES
L CAL COLIFORM ANALYSIS
DAY 6 DATE ��-71�/(8
ANALYST
TIME COLLECTED lt3 a
mples 1 Dilution B(.O1) ml Filtered '2 U Co�onies Counted
2 Dilution B(.01) ml Filtered o!olonies Counted
3 Dilution C(.001)2.o_ml Filtered_Colonies Counted
me Started: /'Analyst
me Completed•I2jS Analyst
t;oli£orm Colonies/g=
_I
LL�itial DO
_Minute
2i Minute pg.
r "Minute 0 L
4 Minute ':�7.3
_ Minute_,
Minute IF, CD
7 Minute
Minute
OXYGEN CONSUMPTION RATE
Initial Temperature 2 `f. `y eL
Final Temperature 25,/ °C-
9 Minute % t Cr
10 Minute -a ,
11 Minute -7,
12 Minute_ / , 7
13 Minute 7, ')-
14 Minute 7, 6
15 Minute

X I v" . 7L(J� x(0U
Cyy
fFLf 2�+�f 01°°
sbuY = ,q,(�v�"ur X �� hY X
VV 1,-t id 1--L I Sa � 1'4 s
.So. Z o br
r
,hw IOVA"�
(S pw -
uIr
r 5-=-
-7c 2
l • 04

DDAY :
AY:
D: -7--k
CITY OF LUMBERTON
PUBLIC UTLITIES LAB WASTE TREATMENT PLANT
TOTAL SOLIDS ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
x
VOLUME (ML)
TARE WEIGHT (GR.)
TARE + SAWLE WEI6HT (6R )
1)
1)
1)
1)
2)
d3
2) —
2)
-;z�, 72 /53-(c
2) 72•/S�Cr
3)
3)
3)
3)
4)
5
4) 5-o M (
4)
2, 3 F 3 g
4) /Z 2, S?o -2-
5)
5)
5)
5)
6)
6)
6)
So . zv
6)
DRIED
WEI�,Hl (GR
TOTAL SOLIDS (GR.)
TOTAI
SOLIDS (MG/ )
1)
1)
1)
2)
z , G O
2)
—
2)
13)
3)
3)
�4)
7 'J. .3 2 `t S
4)
Cl �eS 7
4)
1 5) :'
-16)
5)
6)
5)
6)
-c
TOTAL
M9JFFLED WEIGHT (GR)
TOTAL FIXED SOLIDS (GR.)
TOTAL FIXED SOLIDS (
ll
1)
1)
2)
2)
2)
3)
3)
3)
4)
4)
4)
5)
5)
5)
6)
6)
6)
-
V LYST:
,CALCULATED BY: Lit
71ECKED BY:
-j
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS (MG/i_)
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS
STARTED:
DATE: -7//
TIME: /2 o v
COhPLETED:
DATE: 7./ td 9
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
TIME: / S 3 5"

� , ._,.r���i�,l
.. ... .. <+: .:J �
�1

!-CITY. OF LUMBERTON, N.C.
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
'4BORATORY WORKSHEET
;CAL COLIFORM ANALYSIS
DAY 6 DATE /M&kc 7 13 17F
ANALYST
TIME COLLECTED '*3 S O
SLUDGE ANALYSES
imples 1 Dilution B(.01) ml Filtered_�Colonies Counted
2 Dilution B(.01)—f ml Filtered-:3 Colonies Counted
3 Dilution C(.001)�p_ml Filtered _2— Colonies Counted
.me Started: J �Od Analyst
.me Completed_�2Analyst
1:iliform Colonies/g= 3 ( 2.S O
;_iitial DO �.
Minute
i Minute 6'
Minute
4. Minute
�_'Minute��
iMinute v
7 Minute , 9
I Minute S .
OXYGEN CONSUMPTION RATE
9 Minute J1
10 Minute s, (p
11 Minute S; S
12 Minute S� y
13 Minute_3
14 Minute S, 2
15 Minute s, L
Initial Temperature Ono L
Final Temperature gl3
R o�
Z 3 6
� e '
anon /�`-�

rs
cy✓ g (,Of)
e : I.�s C. 3 i d
our _ 410,
L.-
IK•`fR,2 �f-P
Sv IA = 2 77 �-/02 A
�Va-.•,. orb sa �J�r
-------------------� r

llAIt: 7
DAY: act
CITY OF LUMBERTON
PUBLIC UTLITIES'LAB WASTE TREATMENT PLANT
TOTAL SOLIDS ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
tom. rum
VOLUME A)
TARE WEIGHT (GR.)
TARE + SAMPLE WEIGHT (GR.)
1)
1)
1)
1)
2)
2) —
2)
7
1 91
2)
I I
3)
3)
3)
3)
4)
SLr
14) S'o ,, F
4)
a- . D S`3
4) / A
5)
5)
S)
5)
6)
6)
6)
9. 3 S ?
6)
TOTAL SOLIDS (GR-)
TOTAL
SO IDS (Mc/
1)
1)
1)
2)
`7 1. `7 1
L
2)
----
2) —
3)
3)
3)
5)
5)
5)
6)
6)
6)
TOTAL
.2)
MUFFLED WEIGHT (GR)
TOTAL FIXED SOLIDS (GR.)
2)
TOTAL FIXED SOLIDS (
2)
13)
3)
3)
CO
4)
4)
15)
6)
5)
6)
5)
6)
FTOTAL
1
JVLYST:
CULATED BY:
1 NECKED BY: `1-17- 2 y
VOLATILE
SOLIDS (Mc/I_)
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS
STARTED:
DATE:
TIME: r ti 3 0
COMPLETED:
DATE: I t7
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
TIhE: I S S �

.. ;CY OF LUMBERTON, N.C.
iASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
'.ORATORY WORKSBEET
SLUDGE ANALYSES
" :AL COLIFORM ANALYSIS
DAY & DATE •C 07
ANALYST P-4A
TIME COLLECTED 13 �S
aples 1 Dilution B(.01) . ml Filtered O Colonies Counted
2 Dilution B(.01)_g_ml Filtered Q Colonies Counted
3 Dilution C(.001)a.0 ml Filtered Colonies Counted
me Started: S�7V Analyst vsY s,
d: me CompleteAnalyst.
;oiiform Colonies/g=
:I_itial Do r
linute
:'-Minute_��
1! linute
4 Minute (p ,
UlinuteL (0
i linute_
F Minute
linute CP rJ
91,
OXYGEN CONSUMPTION RATE
9 Minute �a •�
10 Minute
11 Minute�� C�
12 Minute 5 q
13 Minute �' 6
14 Minute
15 Minute -5-r 'P
Initial Temperature
Final Temperature
c
A, P
sue---

So�i��S — Dry x cam l,o /�2
tau - U X Ok
UV �C.of� X Z(o 1) )'--;o 'uo)x 1..9 G Ff, //�;i ✓a .�JJL �
Are- /
Sow, CC D i
( ci zo 4 i V—vroY i� d,
oTzt-, 961;c�s
So v.r
5 - �

DATE :-711�1Y �
DAY: z,�
CITY OF LUMBERTON
PUBLIC UTLITIES LAB WASTE TREATMENT PLANT
TOTAL SOLIDS ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
tea, msa #
VOLUME (ML)
TARE WEIGHT (GR.)
TARE
+ SAMPLE WIGHT (GR.)
1)
ll
1)
1)
2)
z
2) —
2)
S, z 5
2)
Sq z 4c S
3)
3)
3)
3)
4)
4)
4)
�. 7 7
4)
3 • Lt 9 1
5)
5)
5)
or
5)
TOTAL SOLIDS (GR.)
TOTAL SOLIDS (Ms/ )
1)
1>
1)
1. 2) 19 s, (-F-2-
2)
2)
3)
-7
3)
4)
o f 2
3)
4)
0 3 0 `+
-5) :`
5)
5)
6)
6)
6)
wmm�-
- MIJFFLED WEIGHT (GR)
TOTAL FIXED SOLIDS (GR.)
TOTAL
FIXED SOLIDS
1TOTAL
I1)
1
1)
7
1)
�. 2)
2)
2)
3)
3)
j;3)
_4)
4)
4)
5)
5)
-
5)
6)
6)
6)
_
"IALYST:�� rem
I-CULATED BY:"S -
CHECKED BY: -ak `I - �,� -9k
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS (MG/O
ANALYSIS STARTED:
DATE:
TIME: I z o
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
DATE:? I
F2)
3)
4),
5)
6)
TIME: L53L

ITY OF LUMBERTON, N.C.
nASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
T-ABORATORY WORRSHEET
SLUDGE ANALYSES
ECAL COLIFORM ANALYSIS
DAY & DAT ci L5, 7 (�O
ANALYST 11JTio
TIME COLLECTED/C
. `A�
amples 1 Dilution B(.O1) 7 ml Filtered /3 Colonies Counted
2 Dilution B(.01) Q ml Filtered Colonies Counted i
3 Dilution C(.001)ab_ml Filteced_ f_ Colonies Counted
Mime Started: J335 Analyst
ime Completed•113 A Analyst
olifocm Colonies/g=
nitial DO e
' Minute
Minute
Minute �. 3
4 Minute_ (P,
Minute��
Minute
Minute
Minute S,
OXYGEN CONSUMPTION RATE
9 Minute
10 Minute
11 Minute s, S
12 Minute_ 1
13 Minute Y, 3
14 Minute
15 Minute ,_,
0
Initial Temperature 7-Lj�
Final Temperature o2 Lf, [[�dc
/• ae.(.3 a`

70
So - LA Y
fl =-US (2.o_T
O _ /_C3
Vy,, so i ;1s
�tiv�ie /ay0
4 -c4--- .5-, 1
1 S .w
-----------------------

DATE: —_I,/ ll�/�S'
DAY:T ham%
CITY OF LUMBERTON
PUBLIC UTLITIES LAB WASTE TREATMENT PLANT
TOTAL SOLIDS' ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
NAVR&#
VOLUME (ML)'
TARE WEIGHT (GR.)
TARE
+ SAMPLE WEIGHT (GR.)
1)
ll
1)
1)
2)
2) —
2)
'7 (.? 10 S
2)
-7 /. -7 I U S-
3)
3)
3)
3)
4)
F'55
rp
4) s-o
4)
(,If ,3-72b
4)
/ G , 24/
5)
5)
5)
5)
6)
6)
6)
S/• r5 32
6)
1 DRUM
WETGUI (PR
TOTAL SOLIDS (GR.)
TOTAL SOLIDS (MG/ )
1)
1)
1)
2)
—7 1. -7 o SS
2)
—
2)
3)
3)
3)
4)
S, 3 `7 (0
4)
4)
(l 4 o v
5) :`
5)
5)
6)
6)
6)
TOTAL
MUFFLED WEIGHT (GR)
TOTAL FIXED SOLIDS (GR.)
TOTAL
FIXED SOLIDS (
1)
1)
1)
2)
2)
2)
3)
3)
3)
4)
4)
4)
5)
5)
'5)
6) .
6)
6)
'NALYST: l r�
_.IALCULATED BY: * TM%
NECKED BY: `(� 4 `i-2-LU
TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS (MG/0
ANALYSIS, STARTED:
DATE: Y
TIME: 1 zo a
ANALYSIS DATE: -7 117i 9
2) -
3)
4)
6)
TIME: l3 3 Ca

APPENDIX B '
SOIL SERIES DESCRIPTIONS AND
INTERPRETATIONS RECORDS

FACEVILLE

LOCATION FACEVILLE GA+AL FL MD NC SC VA
�I
Established Series
_ Rev. RLW
` l 6/89
i
FACEVILLE SERIES
' The Faceville series consists of deep, well drained, moderately
permeable soils that formed in red clayey sediments. These soils are on
Coastal Plain uplands and have slopes ranging from 0 to 15 percent. Near
the type location the mean annual temperature is 65 degrees F. and mean
annual precipitation is 48 inches.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Clayey, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kandiudults
TYPICAL PEDON: Faceville fine sandy loam --southeast facing convex 1
percent slope. (Colors are for moist soil unless otherwise stated.)
Ap--O to 5 inches; brown (10YR 4/3) fine sandy loam; weak fine
granular structure; very friable; strongly acid; abrupt smooth boundary.
(4 to 10 inches thick)
Btl--5 to 11 inches; yellowish red (5YR 5/6) sandy clay loam; weak
fine subangular blocky structure; friable; strongly acid; gradual wavy
boundary. (3 to 12 inches thick)
Bt2--11 to 28 inches; yellowish red (5YR 5/6) sandy clay; moderate
medium subangular blocky structure; friable; strongly acid; gradual wavy
boundary. (10 to 20 inches thick)
Bt3--28 to 34 inches; red (2.5YR 4/6) sandy clay; moderate medium
subangular blocky structure;.friable; strongly acid; gradual irregular
boundary. (6 to 24 inches thick)
Bt4--34 to 60 inches; red (2.5YR 4/6) sandy clay; few fine distinct
strong brown (7.5YR 5/6) and yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) mottles;
moderate medium subangular blocky structure; friable; strongly acid;
diffuse irregular boundary. J 10 to 30 inches thick)
Bt5--60 to 72 inches; coarsely mottled dark red (10R 3/6),
yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) and very pale brown (10YR 7/3) sandy clay;
strong medium subangular blocky structure; friable; strongly acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Peach County, Georgia; one-fourth mile west of U.S.
jJ Highway 41 on Powersville Road in peach orchard, north side of road.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: The solum thickness is 65 inches or more.
Reaction is very strongly acid or strongly acid except in surface '
horizons that have been limed and in some pedons the Bt horizons are
medium acid, and rarely medium acid in the upper Bt horizon.
I� The A horizon has a hue of 10YR through 5YR, value of 4 or 5 and chroma
of 2 through 8. It is loamy sand, loamy fine sand, sandy loam, fine
sandy loam, or loam. Eroded phases have hue as red as 2.5YR and texture
as fine as sandy clay loam. Ironstone nodules in the A horizon range
from none to about 11 percent and 3 to 20 mm in size.
The E horizon, where present, has hue of 10YR through 5YR, value of 5
through 7 and chroma of 3 or 4. It is loamy sand, loamy fine sand,

PAGE 02
sandy loam, fine sandy loam, or loam. Ironstone nodules range from none
to about 11 percent and are 3 to 20 mm in size.
The Btl horizon has hue of 7.5YR through 2.5YR, value of 4 or 5 and
chroma of 6 or 8. It is sandy clay loam or sandy clay. Ironstone
nodules range from 0 to 3 percent and are 3 to 20 mm in diameter.
The Bt2, Bt3, Bt4 and Bt5 horizons have hue of 5YR through 10R, value of
4 or 5 and chroma of 4 through 8. Brownish and yellowish mottles, where
present, are in or below the Bt3 horizon. Texture is sandy clay, clay
loam or clay. In some pedons the Bt5 horizon is mottled reddish,
brownish and yellowish. Some pedons have gray mottles below 60 inches.
The clay content of the control section ranges from 36 to 55 percent
with less than 30 percent silt. Plinthite ranges from 0 to 4 percent
below 40 inches.
The BC horizon, where present, is below 60 inches and has the same color
as the lower Bt horizons with brownish and yellowish mottles or it is
mottled reddish, brownish and yellowish. Some pedons have gray mottles.
It is sandy clay.
COMPETING SERIES: This is the Esto series of the same family and the
Dewey, Esto, Fullerton, Henderson, Marlboro, Summerton, and Waynesboro
i series of closely related families. All are well drained. Esto soils
have gray mottles in the upper Bt horizon that are inherited from the
parent maaterial. Dewey soils have 30 percent or more silt in the Bt
,i horizon. Fullerton and Henderson soils have 15 to 35 percent chert
fragments throughout their sola. Marlboro soils have Bt horizons of
10YR and 7.5YR hues. Summerton soils are mottled in shades of yellow or
brown in the upper part of the Bt horizon. Waynesboro soils are dark red
in the lower part of the Bt horizon.
i
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Faceville soils are on level to rolling uplands of
-, the Coastal Plain. Dominant slopes range from 0 to 12 percent, but some
slopes range to about'15 percent. The soil formed in Coastal Plain
sediments that are dominantly clayey texture, though they commonly
contain coarser strata within depths of 5 to 10 feet. Average annual
precipitation is about 45 to 50 inches and the average annual
temperature is about 60 to 70 degrees F.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: In addition to the competing Esto,
Henderson and Summerton soils are the Clarendon, Dothan, Grady,
Greenville, Irvington, Lucy, Malbis, Noboco, Norfolk, Orangeburg, Red
Bay, and Tifton series. Clarendon, Dothan and Tifton soils have more
than 5 percent plinthite in the B horizon above 60 inches. Grady soils
are poorly drained and are in shallow depressions. Greenville and Red
_ Bay soils have dark red B horizons. Irvington and Malbis soils are
moderately well drained and have more than 5 percent plinthite in the B
horizon above 60 inches. Lucy soils have a sandy surface horizon 20 to
40 inches thick. Noboco, Norfolk and Orangeburg soils have less than 35
percent clay in the control section.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Well drained; medium runoff; moderate
permeability.
USE -AND VEGETATION: Most of the acreage has been cleared and is used
for growing cotton corn, Peanuts, soybeans, wheat, hay, vegetables,
small grains, and tobacco. In recent years, some areas have been

PAGE 03
converted to pasture or reforested. Forests are loblolly, shortleaf,
and slash pine and a mixture of upland oaks, hickory; and dogwood.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Alabama, Georgia, Florida, North Carolina,
South Carolina, and Virginia. The series is extensive.
i+
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Decatur County, Georgia; 1933.
-i REMARKS: Diagnostic horizons and features recognized in this pedon are:
L +
Ochric epipedon - the zone from the surface to approximately 5 inches
i (Ap horizon)
Argillic horizon - the zone from approximately 5 to 72 inches (Btl, Bt2,
+
Bt3, Bt4 and Bt5 horizons)
Kandic horizon - the zone from approximately 5 to 72 inches with low
acitivity clay in most of the upper 40 inches (Btl, Bt2, Bt3, Bt4 and
Bt5 horizons).
Revised 5/89
SIR = GA0005
MLRA = 133A .
National Cooperative Soil Survey
U.S.A.

GAOOOS S O I L I N T E R P R E T A T I O N S R E C O R D FACEVILLE SERIES
MLRA(S): 133A
REV. RLW, 7-89
TYPIC KANDIUDULTS, CLAYEY, KAOLINITIC, THERMIC
THESE ARE WELL DRAINED NEARLY LEVEL TO SLOPING SOILS THAT FORMED IN CLAYEY COASTAL. PLAIN SEDIMENTS. THESE SOILS HAVE A
BROWN FINE SANDY LOAM SURFACE LAYER ABOUT 5 INCHES THICK. THE SUBSOIL TO A DEPTH OF 72 INCHES IS CHIEFLY SANDY CLAY; IT
15 YELLOWISH RED IN THE UPPER PART; RED IN THE MIDDLE AND MOTTLED WITH SHADES OF RED AND BROWN IN THE LOWER PART. SLOPES
RANGE FROM O TO 15-PERCENT. _
LANDSCAPE AND CLIMATE PROPERTIES
ANNUAL AIR
FROST FREE
ANNUAL ELEVATION
DRAINAGE
SLOPE
TEMPERATURE
DAYS
PRECIPITATION (FTI
CLASS
(PCTI
O 15
Lb
IMAILD SOIL PROPERTIES
(A1
DEPTH
(IN.)
USDA
FRACT.
FRACT.
PERCENT OF MATERIAL
LESS
CLAY
TEXTURE
UNIFIED
AASHTO
>10 IN
3-10 IN
THAN
3" PASSING SIEVE
NO.
0-5
LS, LFS
SM
_
(PCT)
(PCT)
(PCT)
4 10 1 40
1 200
0-5
SL, FSL
SM, SM-SC
A-2
A-2, A-4
0
0
90-100
85-100 72-97
13-25
2-10
0-5
SCL
SM, CL-ML,
ML. SM-SC
A-4
0
0
90-100
85-100 72-97
17-38
5-20
5-11
SCL, SC
SC, ML. CL,
SM
A-4, A-6
0
0
90-100
90-100 63-97
40-58
20-28
11-72
SC, C. CL
CL, SC, CH, ML
A-6, A-7
0
O
96-100
90-100 85-98
46-66
20-36
0
O
98-100
95-100 75-99
45-72
35-55
DEPTH
LIQUID
PLAS-
MOIST BULK
PERMEA-
AVAILABLE
SOIL
SALINITY
SAR
CEC
CAC03
(1N.)
T
LIMIT
TICITY
DENSITY
BILITY -
WATER CAPACITY
REACTION
GYPSUM
INDEX_
(G/CM3)
(IN HR)
(IN/TN)
(PH)
(MMHO$
CM)
(ME/100G)
(PCT)
(PCT)
O-5
-
NP
1.45-1.65
6.0-20
0.06-0.09
4.5-5.5
O-5
<25
NP-7
1.40-1.65
6.0-20
0.06-0.09
4.5-5.5
-
0-5
<25
NP-7
1.40-1.60
0.6-2.0
0.10-0.13
4.5-5.5
-
5-11
<35
NP-13
1.35-1.60
0.6-2.0
0.12-0.15
4.5-5.5
-
11-72
25-52
11-25
1.25-1.GO
0.6-2.0
0.12-0.18
4.5-6.0
-
DEPTH
ORGANIC
SHRINK-
EROSION
WIND
WIND
CORROSIVITY
(IN.)
MATTER
SWELL
FACTORS
EROD.
EROO.'
K
IPCT)
POTENTIAL
T GROUP
5 -
INDEX
-
STEEL CONCRETE
LOW MODERATE
0-5
.5-1
LOW
.17
0-5
.5-2
LOW
.28
5 -
-
0-5
.5-1
LOW
.32
5
-
5-11
LOW
.37
11-72
LOW
.37
FLOODING
HIGH
WATER TABLE
CEMENTED PAN
BEDROCK
SUBSIDENCE
HYD
POTENT'L
DEPTH
(FT)
KIND MONTHS
DEPTH HARDNESS
DEPTH
HARDNESS
iNI T. TOTAL
GYP
FROST
FREgl1E NCY DURATION
MONTHS
NONE
>6.0
(IN)
(IN)
(IN) IIN1
ACTION
-
>60
B
-

�. -,..,ACE'
CAAITTADV FArTl LTTCC 1.1
GA0005
-_--'-' -
0-8%: SLIGHT
UUN]IKUCIIUN MATERIAL (B)
SEPTIC TANK
8-15'%: MODERATE -SLOPE
FAIR -LOW STRENGTH
ABSORPTION
-
ROADFILL
FIELDS
0-2%: MODERATE -SEEPAGE
IMPROBABLE -EXCESS FINES
SEWAGE
2-7%: MODERATE-SEEPAGE,SLOPE
LAGOON
7+/: SEVERE -SLOPE
SAND
AREAS
0-8%: MODERATE -TOO CLAYEY
IMPROBABLE -EXCESS FINES
SANITARY
8-15%: MODERATE-SLOPE,T00 CLAYEY
LANDFILL
GRAVEL
(TRENCH)
-
0-8%: SLIGHT
PDOR-THIN LAYER
SANITARY
8-15%: MODERATE -SLOPE
_
LANDFILL
TOPSOIL
(AREA)
0-8%: FAIR -TOO CLAYEY
DAILY
8-15%: FAIR -TOO CLAYEY,SLOPE
WATER MANAGEMENT (B)
COVER FOR
0-8%: MODERATE -SEEPAGE
LANDFILL
POND
8+/: SEVERE -SLOPE
RESERVOIR
AREA
BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT (B)
0-8%: MODERATE -TOO CLAYEY
SLIGHT
SHALLOW
8-15%: MODERATE -TOO CLAYEY,SLOPE
EMBANKMENTS
EXCAVATIONS
DIKES AND
LEVEES
0-8'/.: SLIGHT
SEVERE -NO WATER
DWELLINGS
8-15%:' MODERATE -SLOPE
EXCAVATED
WITHOUT
PONDS
BASEMENTS
AQUIFER FED
0-8%: SLIGHT
DEEP TO WATER
DWELLINGS
B-15%: MODERATE -SLOPE
WITH
DRAINAGE
BASEMENTS
SMALL
0-
8%: SLIGHT
MODERATE -SLOPE
O-3% SL, FSL, SCL: FAVORABLE
COMMERCIAL
8+%:
: SEVERE -SLOPE
IRRIGATION
IRRIGATION
3+% SL, FSL, SCL: SLOPE
0-3'% LS, LFS: FAST INTAKE
BUILDINGS
LS, LFS: FAST INTAKE,SLOPE
0-8%: MODERATE -LOW STRENGTH
O-8%: FAVORABLE
LOCAL
8-15%: MODERATE -LOW STRENGTH,,SLOPE
TERRACES
8+%: SLOPE
ROADS AND
AND
STREETS
DIVERSIONS
LAWNS,
0-8%: SLIGHT
-0-8%: FAVORABLE
LANDSCAPING
8-15/: MODERATE -SLOPE
GRASSED
8+/: SLOPE
AND GOLF
-
WATERWAYS
'
FAIRWAYS

C - F . C
FACEVILLE SERIES
GA0005
0-8%: SLIGHT
C urm u�i
{DI
0-2%: SLIGHT
8-15%: MODERATE -SLOPE
2-6%: MODERATE -SLOPE
CAMP AREAS
PLAYGROUNDS
6+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
0-8%: SLIGHT
SLIGHT
8-15%: MODERATE -SLOPE
PATHS
PICNIC AREAS
AND
TRAILS
OFrinMAl TKlTCDDDCTATlnAlc
CLASS-
CAP A-
CORN
COTTON
'.o.UnC
SOYBEANS
1.1UN
PEANUTS
LLVLL
MANAGEMENT)
IMPROVED
BAHIAGRASS
GRASS HAY
DETERMINING
BILITY
LINT
BERMUDAGR.
PHASE
(BUI
(LBS)
(BU)
(LBS)
(AUM)
(AUM)
(TONS)
NIRR IRR.
NIRR IRR.
NIRR IRR.
NIRR IRR.
NIRR
IRR.
NIRR IRA.
NIRR IRR.
NIRR TRR.
0-2%
1
115
875
45
4000
10.0
7.0
5.8
2-5%
2E (
115
875
45
4000
10.0
7.0
5.8
2-5% ERODED
3E
90
750
35
3300
8.0
6.0
4.5
5-8%
3E
90
650
30
3000
9.5
6.0
5.0
8-12%
4E
80
500
25
2600
7.0
5.0
q p
12-15"/,
6E
-
-
7.0
5.0
4.0
5-8% SL, ERODED
3E
85
550
25
2800
8.5
5.5
5-8% SCL, ERODED
4E
75
500
20
2600
8.0
5.0
4.0
8-12% ERODED
GE
-
-
4.0
-
-
6.0
4.0
3.0
CLASS-
DETERMINING
❑RD
SYM
MANAGEMENT
PR08LEM5
POTENTIAL PRODUCTIVITY
TREES TO PLANT
EROS'N
EQUIP.
SEEDL.
WINDTH
PLANT
COMMON TREES
SITE
PROD
PHASE
HAZARD
LIMIT
MORT'Y
HAZARD
COMPET
INOX
CLAS
ALL
8A
SLIGHT
SLIGHT
SLIGHT
LOBLOLLY PINE
82
8
LOBLOLLY PINE
SLASH PINE
80
10
SLASH PINE
LONGLEAF PINE
65
5

-
rACEVILLE 'tl e5
GA0005
CLASS-DETERMIN'G PHASE
SPECIES
HT
omEAnS
SPECIES
HT
SPECIES
NONE
HT
SPECIES
HT
WILDLIFE
T
HABITA
SUITABILITY
(C)
CLASS-
POTENTIAL
FOR HABITAT
ELEMENTS
POTENTIAL
AS
HABITAT
FOR
FOR:RANG
DETERMINING
GRAIN 8
GRASS &
WILD
HARDWD
CONIFER
SHRUBS
WETLAND
SHALLOW
OPENED
WOODED
WETLAND
:
D
PHASE
SEED
LEGUME
HERB.
TREES
PLANTS
PLANTS
WATER
WILDLF
WILDLF
WILDLF
WILDLF
O -2%
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
-
POOR
V. POOR
GOOD
GOOD
V. POOR
2-5%
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
-
V. POOR
V. POOR
GOOD
GOOD
V. POOR
5-151
FAIR
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
-
V. POOR
V. POOR
GOOD
GOOD
V. POOR
-
POTENTIAL
NATIVE
PLANT
COMMUNITY
RANGELAND OR FOREST
UNDERSTORY VEGETATION)
PLANT
PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION
(DRY WEIGHT) BY
CLASS DETERMINING
PHASE
COMMON PLANT NAME
SYMBOL
ALL
(NLSPNI
LONGLEAF UNIOLA
CHSE2
37
BEAKED PANICUM
PAAN
18
SPREADING PANICUM
PARA
9
LITTLE BLUESTEM
SCSC
9
PINEHILL BLUESTEM
SCSCD
9
UNKNOWNS
UUUU
IB
POTENTIAL PRODUCTION (LBS./AC. DRY WT):
FAVORABLE YEARS
NORMAL YEARS
UNFAVORABLE YEARS
c nnrun
A ESTIMATES OF ENGINEERING PROPERTIES BASED ON TEST DATA DF 9-PEDONS FROM GEORGIA AND FLORIDA.
B RATINGS BASED ON NSH PART 11, SECTION 403.
C WILDLIFE RATINGS BASED ON SOILS MEMORANDUM-7.1, JANUARY 1972.

GOLDSBORO

1 LOCATION GOLDSBORO
Established Series
Rev. AG
3/93
GOLDSBORO SERIES
NC+AL AR FL GA SC VA
The Goldsboro series consists of very deep, moderately permeable,
moderately well drained soils that formed in Coastal Plain sediments.
These soils are on uplands and have slopes ranging from 0 to 10 percent.
Near the type location, mean annual temperature is about 62 degrees F,
and mean annual precipitation is about 48 inches.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Fine -loamy, siliceous, thermic Aquic Paleudults
TYPICAL PEDON: Goldsboro loamy sand --cultivated. (Colors are for moist
soil unless otherwise stated.)
Ap--0 to 8 inches; grayish brown (10YR 5/2) loamy sand; weak medium
granular structure; very friable; many fine roots; moderately acid;
clear smooth boundary. (5 to 10 inches thick)
-- E--8 to 12 inches; pale brown (10YR 6/3) loamy sand; weak medium
granular structure; very friable, many fine roots; moderately acid;
clear smooth boundary. (0 to 10 inches thick)
BE--12 to 15 inches; brownish yellow (10YR 6/6) sandy loam; weak
fine subangular blocky structure; friable; slightly sticky; many fine
roots; strongly acid; clear smooth boundary. (O.to 12 inches thick)
f l
Bt1--15 to 25 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) sandy clay loam;
weak fine subangular blocky structure; friable, slightly sticky,
slightly plastic; common fine roots; sand grains coated and bridged with
clay; few faint clay films on faces of peds; very strongly acid; gradual
wavy boundary.
Bt2--25 to 45 inches; pale brown (10YR 6/3) sandy clay loam; common
medium distinct gray (10YR 5/1) and yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) mottles;
weak fine subangular blocky structure; friable, slightly sticky,
slightly plastic; few fine roots; sand grains coated and bridged with
i clay; few faint clay films on faces of peds; very strongly acid; gradual
wavy boundary. (Combined thickness of the Bt horizon is 12 to 72
inches)
1�
' Btg--45 to 65 inches; gray (10YR 6/1) sandy clay loam; common
medium prominent red (2.5YR 5/6), and common medium distinct brownish
yellow (10YR 6/6) mottles; weak fine subangular blocky structure;
friable, slightly sticky, slightly plastic; sand grains coated and
bridged with clay; few faint clay films on faces of peds; very strongly
acid; gradual irregular boundary. (0 to 24 inches thick)
BC9--65 to 76 inches; gray (10YR 6/1) sandy loam and strata of
sandy clay loam, common medium distinct brownish yellow (10YR 6/6) and
common medium faint gray (10YR 5/1) mottles; weak fine subangular blocky
structure; friable, slightly sticky, slightly plastic; sand grains
coated and bridged with clay; very strongly acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Wayne County, North Carolina; 5 miles.northeast of
Goldsboro, 0.4 mile north of Stoney Creek Church and 0.3 mile west of

i
PAGE 02
intersection of SR 1523 and 1545.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Solum thickness is more than 60 inches.
Coarse fragments of small pebbles, gravel, and concretions range_up to
about 5 percent in some pedons. Reaction is strongly acid to extremely
acid except where the surface has been limed.
The A or Ap horizon has hue of 10YR, or 2.5Y value of 2 to 6, and chroma
of 1 to 4. Texture is loamy sand, loamy fine sand, sandy loam, and fine
sandy loam.
The E horizon, where present, has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 5 to 7,
and chroma of 2 to 6. Texture is loamy sand, loamy fine sand, sandy
loam, and fine sandy loam.
The BE horizon, where present, has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 5 to 7,
and chroma of 3 to 6. Texture is sandy loam or fine sandy loam.
The upper Bt horizon has hue of 7.5YR to 2.5Y, value'of 4 to 7, and
chroma of 3 to 8. The lower Bt horizon has colors similar to those in
the upper Bt, but also has mottles with value of 4 or more and chroma of
1 or 2, and mottles of high contrast; or it is mottled in these colors.
Low chroma mottles indicative of wetness are within a depth of 30 inches
below the surface. Texture is sandy clay loam, sandy loam, loam, or
clay loam. Content of silt in the control section is less than 30
percent. Some pedons have lower Bt horizons that are clay or sandy
clay.
The Btg horizon, where present, has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 4 to
7, and chroma of 1 or 2 with common to many mottles of high contrast. It
has the same texture range as the Bt horizon.
The BCg horizon, where present, has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 4 to
7, and chroma of 1 or 2. Mottles of high contrast range from common to
many. Some pedons have a BC horizon which has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y,
value of 5 to 7, and chroma of 3to 5. Mottles with chroma of 2 or less
and other high contrast mottles range from common to many. Texture is
sandy loam, fine sandy loam, sandy clay loam, or loam.
The Cg horizon has hue of 10YR, to 5Y, value of 5 to 7, and chroma of 1
to 2 with few to many mottles of high contrast. It is stratified sandy,
loamy, and clayey Coastal Plain sediments.
COMPETING SERIES: These are Izagora, Kullit, Quitman, and Wrightsboro
series. Izagora soils contain more than 30 percent silt. Kullit soils
have Bt horizons in hue of 5YR or redder. Quitman soils are brittle and
compact in about 10 to 20 percent of the Bt and lower Bt horizons.
'i Wrightsboro soils have clayey 2B or 2C horizons between 1 and 2 meters
below the surface.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Goldsboro soils are on broad interstream divides in
the Coastal Plain. Slope is commonly 0 to 6 percent, but ranges from 0
to 10 percent. The soil formed in unconsolidated stratified Coastal
Plain sediments, dominantly of medium texture. Near the type location,
mean annual temperature is about 62 degrees F, and mean annual
precipitation is about 48 inches.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: These include Bonneau, Duplin, Exum,

PAGE 03
Foreston, Lynchburg, Nobocco, Norfolk, Ocilla, Orangeburg, Pantego,
Rains, and Wagram series. Bonneau, Nobocco, Norfolk, Orangeburg, and
Wagram soils are better drained and are on landscape positions that are
slightly higher or nearer to drainageways. Duplin, Exum, Foreston, and
Ocilla are in similar landscape positions to Goldsboro. Lynchburg,
Pantego, and Rains soils are more poorly drained and are in positions
that are slightly lower or further from drainageways.
Bonneau, Ocilla, and Wagram soils have sandy A horizons 20 to 40 inches
thick. Also Bonneau and Wagram soils lack gray mottles within 30 inches
of the surface. Duplin soils are clayey, Exum soils are fine -silty, and
Foreston soils are coarse -loamy. Lynchburg soils are somewhat poorly
drained. Norfolk and Orangeburg soils are well drained. Pantego soils
are very poorly drained and Rains soils are poorly drained.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Moderately well drained; slow to medium
runoff; moderate permeability.
USE AND VEGETATION: The majority of the acreage is cleared and used for
growing corn, peanuts, tobacco, soybeans, small grain, cotton, and
pasture. Original forests were pines and hardwoods. Common trees
include loblolly pine, longleaf pine, slash pine, sweetgum, southern red
oak, white oak, water oak, and red maple, yellow poplar. Understory
plants include American holly, blueberry, flowering dogwood, greenbrier,
persimmon, redbay, southern bayberry (waxmyrtle), inkberry (bitter
gallberry), honeysuckle, poison ivy, and summersweet'clethra.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Alabama; Arkansas, Florida, Georgia,
Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia. The series
is of large extent.
-SERIES ESTABLISHED: Duplin County, North Carolina, 1955.
REMARKS: Diagnostic horizons and soil properties recognized in this
pedon are:
Ochric epipedon - the zone from the soil surface to a depth of 12 inches
(the Ap and E horizons).
I
Argillic horizon - the zone between depths of 15 to 76 inches (the BE,
Btl, Bt2, Btg and BCg horizons).
Aquic feature - Mottles with value of 4 or more and chroma of 2 or less
between within a depth of 30 inches (Bt2 horizon)
MLRA(S): 133A, 153A, 153B SIR: NC0041
-- National Cooperative Soil Survey
U.S.A.

10041 SOIL I NTERPRETAT IONS RECORD
GOLDSBORO SERIES
RA(S): 133A, 153A, 153E
WLB,RAG, 5-89
A4.,1C PALEUDULTS, FINE -LOAMY, SILICEOUS, THERMIC
E GOLDSBORO SERIES CONSISTS OF NEARLY LEVEL TO GENTLY SLOPING, MODERATELY WELL DRAINED SOILS ON COASTAL PLAIN UPLANDS.
IN A REPRESENTATIVE PROFILE, THE SURFACE LAYER IS GRAYISH BROWN LOAMY SAND ABOUT 8 INCHES THICK. THE SUBSURFACE LAYER IS
-',LE BROWN LOAMY SAND 4 INCHES THICK. THE SUBSOIL EXTENDS TO 76 INCHES. IT IS BROWNISH YELLOW SANDY LOAM IN THE UPPER
RT; YELLOWISH BROWN, PALE BROWN AND GRAY SANDY CLAY LOAM IN THE MIDDLE PART; AND GRAY SANDY LOAM AND SANDY CLAY LOAM
.d THE LOWER PART. SLOPES RANGE FROM 0 TO 8 PERCENT.
LANDSCAPE AND CLI14ATEIPROPERTIES 1
ANNUAL AIR I FROST FREE I ANNUAL I ELEVATION. I DRAINAGE I SLOPE 1
ESTIMATED SOIL PROPERTIES (A)
IDEPTHI
I
I
IFRACT.IFRACT.,IPERCENT
OF MATERIAL
LESS
[CLAY 1
"IN.)1 USDA TEXTURE
I UNIFIED
I AASHTO
1>10 IN13-10IN1 THAN 3" PASSING SIEVE
NO.1
I
I
I
I
I(PCT)
1(PCT)
1 4 1 10 1
40
1 200
I(PCT)1
1�- 15 ISL,FSL
ISM,SC-SM,SC
IA-2,A-4,A-6
1 0
1 0
.195-100 95-100
50-100
15-45
15-15 1
10-15 1LS,LFS
ISM
IA-2
1 0
1 0
195-100 95-100
50-95
13-30
1 2-8 1
,5-451SCL,SL
ISC-SM,SC,CL-ML,CL
IA-2,A-4,A-6
1 0
1 0
198-100 95-100
60-100
25-55
118-301
5-651SCL,CL,SC
ISC,CL,CL-ML,CH
IA-4,A-6,A-7-6
1 0
1 0
195-100 90-100
65-95
36-70
120-341
165-761VAR
EPTHILIQUID IPLAS- I MOIST BULK I PERMEA- I AVAILABLE I SOIL I SALINITY I SAR I CEC I CAC03 I GYPSUM I
`I(IN.)1 LIMIT ITICITY1 DENSITY I BILITY IWATER CAPACITYI REACTION I I I I I I
I_ I ITNOFY I H./PMQ1 I ITN/W01 I ITN/TNI I YGW1 I/MMW1C/nMll IIRF/1nnr.11 to PT1 I IonT1 I
1 15-25 INP-14 1 1.40-1.60 1 2.0-6.0 1 0.10-0.15 1 3.6-6.0 1 1 1 I I I
I_-15 1 15-20 1 NP 1 1.55-1.75 1 6.0-20.0 1 0.06-0.11 1 3.6-5.5 I I I I I 1
115-451 16-37 1 4-18 1 1.30-1.50 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.11-0.17 1 3.6-5.5 1 1 1 1 1 1
15-651 25-55 1 6-32 1 1.30-1.40 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.11-0.20 1 3.6-5.5 1 1 1 1 1 1
6-761 1 1 1 1 1 1 I. I.. 1 1 1
II I I I I I I I I I I I
EPTHIORGANICI SHRINK- I EROSION IWIND I WIND I CORROSIVITY 1
IN.)IMATTER I SWELL I FACTORS IEROD.1 EROD. I I
"I I (PCT) 1POTENTIALI K I Kfl T 1GROU0I INDEX I STEEL ICONCRETEI
_10-15 1 .5-2 1 LOW 1.201.201 5 1 3 1 86 IMODERATEI HIGH I
-15 1 .5-2 1 LOW 1.171.171 5 1 2 1 134 1
__ S-451 1 LOW 1.241.241 1 I 1
145-651 1 LOW 1.241.241
1 5-761 1 1 1 1
FLOODING I HIGH WATER TABLE 1 CEMENTED PAN I BEDROCK ISUBSIDENCE IHYDIPOTENT'LI
I DEPTH I KIND IMONTHS IDEPTHIHARDNESSIDEPTH IHARONESSIINIT.ITOTALIGRPI FROST I
NONE I I 12.0-3.OIAPPARENTIDEC-APRI 1 1 >60 1 1 1 1 B I I

LOSSORO SERIES NCO041
SANITARY FACILITIES (B)
CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL (B)
(SEVERE -WETNESS
II (FAIR -WETNESS I
SIC TANK
I
II I I
.dSORPTION
I
II ROAOFILL [ ]
' FIELDS
[
I
II I I
II I I
I
I0-7%:SEVERE-WETNESS
II (IMPROBABLE -EXCESS FINES I
I SEWAGE
I7-8%:SEVERE-SLOPE,WETNESS
II I ]
LAGOON
I
II SAND I ..
AREAS
I
II I I
lxxx
I
II I I
(SEVERE -WETNESS
SANITARY I
LANDFILL I
(TRENCH) I
(SEVERE -WETNESS
SANITARY ]
LANDFILL ]
(AREA) I
II. (IMPROBABLE -EXCESS FINES
II I
II GRAVEL I
II I
II IFAIR-TOO CLAYEY
II I
II TOPSOIL I
II I
(FAIR -WETNESS
II
DAILY
I
II
WATER MANAGEMENT (B)
COVER FOR
I
II
I0-3%:MODERATE-SEEPAGE ]
LANDFILL
I
II POND .
13-8%:MODERATE-SEEPAGE,SLOPE I
RESERVOIR
I I
-
II AREA
I I
BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT (B)
II
I I
ISEVERE-WETNESS
II
(MODERATE-PIPING,WETNESS ]
SHALLOW
I
IIEMBANKMENTS
I I
(EXCAVATIONS
I
II DIKES AND
I I
I
II LEVEES
] I
I
Ilxxx
I i
'I-
]MODERATE -WETNESS
II
]MODERATE -DEEP TO WATER,SLOW REFILL
)_SWELLINGS
]
]I EXCAVATED
]
,WITHOUT
]
I[ PONDS
]
__3ASEMENTS
I
11AQUIFER FED
I
1-
I
Ilxxx 11
I
ISEVERE-WETNESS
II
I0-3%:FAVORABLE
�J)WELLINGS
I
II
13-8%:SLOPE
I WITH
I
II DRAINAGE
I
' 3ASEMENTS
I
I
11
II
I
I
�f
I0-4%:MODERATE-WETNESS
11
IO-3%SL,FSL:WETNESS,SOIL BLOWING
SMALL
14-8%:MODERATE-WETNESS,SLOPE
11
I0-3%LS,LFS:WETNESS,DROUGHTY,FAST INTAKE
• :OMMERCIAL
�'_3UILDINGS
I
11 IRRIGATION
I3-8%SL,FSL:SLOPE,WETNESS,SOIL BLOWING
I
11
13-8%LS,LFS:SLOPE,WETNESS,DROUGHTY
]
I
Ilxx'
I
'
[MODERATE -WETNESS
II
]WETNESS,SOIL BLOWING
LOCAL
]
][ TERRACES
]
`I -ROADS AND
I
II AND
I
1I. STREETS
1
[[ DIVERSIONS
[
LAWNS, ISLIGHT II ISL,FSL:FAVORABLE
._..IDSCAPING I II GRASSED ILS,LFS:DROUGHTY,ROOTING DEPTH
AND GOLF I II WATERWAYS I
FAIRWAYS I 1I I
l xxx I Ilxxx I

LDSBORO SERIES NCO041
RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (B)
IMODERATE-WETNESS II 10-2%:MODERATE-WETNESS 1
I II I2-6%:MODERATE-SLOPE,WETNESS 1
I CAMP AREAS I IIPLAYGROUNDS 16-8%:SEVERE-SLOPE 1
I II I I
( IMODERATE-WETNESS 11 [SLIGHT
II PATHS I
ICNIC AREASI II AND 1
I II TRAILS [ ..
REGIONAL INTERPRETATIONS
I I
I I I
I I
CAPABILITY AND YIELDS PER ACRE OF CROPS AND PASTURE (HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT)
CLASS- I CAPA-
(COTTON
(TOBACCO
ICORN
(SOYBEANS
(WHEAT
(PEANUTS
(PASTURE I
DETERMINING I BILITY
(LINT
I
I
I
I
I
I I
_ PHASE I
I(LBS)
I(LBS)
I(BU)
I(BU)
I(BU)
I(LBS)
I(AUM)
1 INIRRIIRR.INIRR
IIRR.
INIRR IIRR.
INIRR
IIRR. INIRR IIRR.
INIRR IIRR.
INIRR IIRR.
INIRR IIRR. 1
-2% 1 2W 1
1 700 1
13000 1
1 125
1 1 42 1
1 60 1
13600 1
111.5 1 1
-6% 1 2E 1
1 700 1
12900 1
1 115
1 1 38 1
1 60 1
13400 1
111.5 1 1
16-8% 1 3E I
1 550 1
12600 1
1 90
1 1 28 1
1 50 1
15000 1
110.5 1 1
CLASS- IORDI MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS . I POTENTIAL PRODUCTIVITY I 1.
DETERMINING ISYMIEROS'NIEQUIP.ISEEDL.IWINDTHIPLANT 1 COMMON TREES ISITEIPRODI TREES TO PLANT I,
-, PHASE I IHAZARDILIMIT-IMORT'YIHAZAROICOMPETI IINDXICLASI 1
TALL 19A ISLIGHTISLIGHTISLIGHTISLIGHTIMODER.ILOBLOLLY PINE 190 19 ILOBLOLLY PINE 1
I I [ I I ILONGLEAF PINE 173 16 1 1
I ISLASH PINE 194 112 1 1
I I I I I I I ISWEETGUM I 1 1 1
I (SOUTHERN RED OAK I I I I
I I I I I I (WHITE OAK I I I I
I I I IWATER OAK I I I I
I I I I I I (YELLOW -POPLAR I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I

ILDSBORO SERIES NCO041
NONE
WILDLIFE HABITAT SUITABILITY (D)
i CLASS- POTENTIAL FOR HABITAT ELEMENTS I POTENTIAL AS HABITAT FOR:
I DETERMINING IGRAIN & GRASS &I WILD IHARDWD ICONIFERISHRUBS IWETLANDISHALLOWIOPENLD IWOODLD IWETLANDIRANGELDI
PHASE I SEED (LEGUME I HERB. I TREES (PLANTS I (PLANTS I WATER IWILDLF IWILDLF IWILDLF IWILDLF I
IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD I IPOOR IPOOR IGOOD IGOOD IPOOR I I
I2-6% IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD I IPOOR IV. POORIGOOD IGOOD IV. POORI
IFAIR IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD I IV. POORIV. POORIGOOD IGOOD ]POOR
POTENTIAL NATIVE PLANT COMMUNITY (RANGELAND OR FOREST UNDERSTORY VEGETATION)
I PLANT I
COMMON PLANT NAME I SYMBOL I
UIERICAN HOLLY
IILOP I
IBLUEBERRY
IVACCI. I
'LOWERING DOGWOOD
ICOFL2 I
iREENBRIER
ISMILA2 I
'IPERSIMMON
IDIVI5 I
lOcnBAY
IPEBO I
i iHERN BAYBERRY
IMYCE I
--,,INKBERRY
IILGL I
IHONEYSUCKLE
ILONIC I
i?OISON IVY
ITORA2 I
JUMMERSWEET CLETHRA
I
'
ICLAL3 I
I I
I I
I I
POTENTIAL PRODUCTION (LBS./AC. DRY
FAVORABLE YEARS
NORMAL YEARS
FOOTNOTES
ESTIMATES OF ENGINEERING PROPERTIES BASED ON 2 PEDONS FROM DUPLIN AND WILSON COUNTIES, NC.
A ADDITIONAL ALLOWABLE UNIFIED ENTRY FOR LINE #415 SM-SC.
RATINGS BASED ON NSH, PART 603, 7-83. '
WOODLAND RATINGS BASED ON NATI-ONAL FORESTRY MANUAL, SEP. 1980.
WILDLIFE RATINGS BASED ON SOILS MEMORANDUM-74, JAN. 1972.
"-THIS IS A RATING OVERRIDE. BEE THE INTERPRETATION OVERRIDE FILE FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THIS OVERRIDE.

JOHNS
IJ

LOCATION JOHNS
NC+FL GA SC VA
Established Series
Rev. BTB:ENH
8/87
JOHNS SERIES
The Johns series consists of nearly level, somewhat poorly to moderately
well drained soils on stream terraces and upland of the Coastal Plain.
Slopes range from 0 to 2 percent.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Fine -loamy over sandy or sandy -skeletal, siliceous,
thermic Aquic Hapludults
TYPICAL PEDON: Johns loamy sand --cultivated field. (Colors are for
moist soils unless otherwise stated.)
Ap--O to 8 inches; dark gray (10YR 4/1) loamy sand; weak medium
granular structure; very friable; many fine and medium roots; strongly
acid; abrupt wavy boundary. (6 to 10 inches thick)
E--8 to 15 inches; very pale brown (10YR 7/3) loamy sand; weak
medium granular structure; very friable; few brittle areas at contact
with Bt horizon; strongly acid; clear wavy boundary. (0 to 10 inches
thick)
Bt1--15 to 18 inches; light yellowish brown (2.5Y 6/4) sandy clay
loam; few medium faint strong brown ,(7.5YR 5/8), brownish yellow (10YR
6/6), and light brownish gray (2.5Y 6/2) mottles; weak medium subangular
blocky structure; friable; strongly acid; clear wavy boundary. (3 to 8
inches thick)
Bt2--18 to 32 inches, brownish yellow (10YR 6/8) sandy clay loam;
many medium and coarse distinct gray (10YR 6/1) and strong brown (7.5YR
5/8) mottles; weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable; thin
patchy clay films on faces of peds; very strongly acid; gradual smooth
boundary. (9 to 15 inches thick)
2Cg--32 to 60 inches; light gray (10YR 7/1) sand, common coarse
distinct brownish yellow (10YR 6/8) mottles; single grained; loose;
lenses and pockets of sandy loam and loamy sand; very strongly acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Scotland County, North Carolina; 4 miles north of Maxton
;i on North Carolina Highway 71, and 1 mile northwest of Sycamore Hill
Church.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Thickness of the surface and loamy Bt horizon
ranges from 15 to 40 inches. The soil is very strongly or strongly acid
unless the surface has been limed.
The Al or Ap horizon has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, or it is neutral, value of
3 to 5, and chroma of 0 to 3. Texture is loamy sand, loamy fine sand,
sandy loam, or fine sandy loam.
The E horizon has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 5 to 7, chroma of 3 or
4. Texture is loamy sand, loamy fine sand, sandy loam, or fine sandy
loam.
The BE horizon, where present has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 5 to 7,

PAGE 02
and chroma of 3 to 6. It is sandy loam or fine sandy loam.
The Bt horizon has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 5 to 7, chroma of 4 to
8. Mottles are in shades of brown, yellow, and gray. The lower Bt may
have gray matrix with chroma of 1 or 2 and mottled in shades of gray or
brown. Texture is sandy clay loam;or sandy loam with an average clay
content of 18 to 35 percent and less than 30 percent silt content.
The BCg horizon, where present, has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 5 to
7, and chroma of 1 or 2 or it mottled in shades of these colors. Texture
is sandy loam, fine sandy loam, with thin strata of heavier textures in
some pedons.
The 2Cg horizon has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 5 to 8, and chroma of
1 or 2 or it is commonly mottled in shades of gray, brown, or yellow.
Texture is sand or loamy sand; in some pedons the C horizon has thin
lenses of sandy loam or loam.
COMPETING SERIES: There are no other series in the same family.
Altavista, Bertie, Dragston, Foreston, Goldsboro, Kalmia, Lumbee,
Lynchburg, Ogeechee, Whitwell, and Woodstown series are in closely
related families. Altavista and Bertie soils have mixed mineralogy.
Dragston and Foreston soils have less than 18 percent clay in the Bt
horizons. Goldsboro and Lynchburg soils have sola thicker than 60
inches. Kalmia soils are better drained. Lumbee and Ogeechee soils are
wetter.. Whitwell soils contain more silt. Woodstown soils are mesic.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Johns soils are on stream terraces and uplands of
the Coastal Plain. Slope gradients range between 0 to 2 percent. The
soils formed in stratified fluvial or marine deposits of coarse to
medium textures. Near the type location, mean -annual precipitation is
46 inches and mean annual temperature is 63 degrees F. GEOGRAPHICALLY
ASSOCIATED SOILS: In addition to the competing Goldsboro, Kalmia, and
Lumbee series, are the Norfolk and Wagram series. Norfolk and Wagram
soils have thicker sola, are better drained, and occur on the higher
parts of the landscape.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Somewhat poorly to moderately well drained;
slow runoff; moderate permeability. The seasonally high water table is
within 18 inches of the surface 2 to 6 months annually.
USE AND VEGETATION: Approximately half of areas are cleared and under
cultivation. Cotton, corn, small grain, soybeans, hay crops, and
pasture are the principal uses. Vegetation of forested areas includes
loblolly and longleaf pines with mixed hardwoods.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina,
Virginia, and Florida. The series is of moderate extent.
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Appling and Jeff Davis Counties, Georgia; 1969.
REMARKS: Johns series includes some of the soils that were formerly
included in the Stough series.
Diagnostic horizons and features recognized in this pedon are:
ochric epipedon - the zone from the surface to a depth of 15 inches (the
Ap and E horizons)

PAGE 03
Argillic horizon - the zone from a depth of 15 to 32 inches (the Btl and
Bt2 horizons.)
National Cooperative Soil Survey
U.S.A.

0073 S 0 1 L INTERPRETATIONS RECORD
JOHNS SERIES
'RA(S): 133A, 153A
ENH, 2-89
At,...0 HAPLUOULTS, FINE -LOAMY OVER SANDY OR SANDY -SKELETAL, SILICEOUS, THERMIC
E JOHNS SERIES CONSISTS OF NEARLY LEVEL, SOMEWHAT POORLY TO MODERATELY WELL -DRAINED SOILS ON STREAM TERRACES AND
_.LANDS OF THE COASTAL PLAIN. IN A REPRESENTATIVE PROFILE THE SURFACE LAYER IS DARK GRAY LOAMY SAND ABOUT 8 INCHES
THICK, THE SUBSURFACE LAYER IS VERY PALE BROWN LOAMY SAND 7 INCHES THICK, THE SUBSOIL, TO A DEPTH OF 32 INCHES IS SANDY
AY LOAM. IT IS LIGHT YELLOWISH -BROWN IN THE UPPER PART AND BROWNISH -YELLOW MOTTLED WITH GRAY IN THE LOWER PART. THE
DERLYING LAYER TO 60 INCHES IS LIGHT GRAY SAND. SLOPES RANGE FROM 0 TO 2 PERCENT.
LANDSCAPE AND CLIMATE
PROPERTIES
ANNUAL AIR
FROST FREE ANNUAL
ELEVATION
DRAINAGE
SLOPE
I_ TEMPERATURE
I DAYS I PRECIPITATION 6
(FT)
I
CLASS
1
(PCT)
SP MW
ESTIMATED SOIL PROPERTIES
EPTHI
I I
IFRACT.IFRACT.IPERCENT
OF MATERIAL
LESS
ICLAY I
I(IN.)I USDA
I
TEXTURE I UNIFIED AASHTO
I>10 INI3-10INI THAN 3" PASSING SIEVE NO.I
I
I
I I
I(PCT)
I(PCT)
I 4 I 10
1 40
1 200
I(PCT)I
I J 15 ILS,LFS
ISM IA-2,A-4
I 0
I 0
1100 95-100
60-90
15-45
I4-12 I
I0-15 ISL,FSL
ISM,SC,SC-SM IA-2,A-4
I 0
I 0
1100 95-100
70-98
20-49
I5-15 I
5-32ISCL,SL,CL
ISC,SC-SM,CL,CL-ML IA-2,A-4,A-6,A-7 I 0
I 0
1100 95-100
60-98
30-65
I18-35I
'2-60IS,LS,COS
I
I I
ISM,SP-SM,SP IA-2,A-3
I I
I O
I
I O
I
I95-100 95-100
I
51-90
4-25
I2-10 I
I I
EPTHILIQUID
IPLAS- I
MOIST BULK I
PERMEA-
I AVAILABLE. I
SOIL I SALINITY I SAR I CEC I CAC03 I GYPSUM I
IN.)I LIMIT
ITICITYI
DENSITY I
BILITY
IWATER CAPACITY1
REACTION I I I . I I I
I
11NDEX I
(G/CM3) I
(IN/HR)
I (IN/IN) I
(PH) I(MMHOS/CM)1 1(ME/100G)1 (PCT) I (PCT) I
NP I
1.60-1.75 I
2.0-6.0
I 0.06-0.11 14.5-5.5
115-30
INP-10 I
1.45-1.65 I
2.0-6.0
I 0.10-0.15 1
4.5-5.5 I I I I I I
L,-15
115-32I 20-45
I.5-25 I
1.40-1.60 I
0.6-2.0
I 0.12-0.15 14.5-5.5
I I
-1?,2-60I
I NP I
1.60-1.70 I
6.0-20
I 0.03-0.06 14.5-5.5
I I
IDEPTHIORGANICI SHRINK- I EROSION IWIND I WIND I CORROSIVITY
!IN.)IMATTER I SWELL I FACTORS IEROD.I EROD. I
I0-15 I .5-2 I
LOW 1.151,151 5 I
"1 15 I .5-2 I
LOW 1.201.201 5 I
I 15-32I . I
LOW I.24I.24I.-I
'-(o2-60I I
I, I I
LOW 1.101.101
I I -I
FLOODING
2 I 134 IM
3 I 86 I -
I HIGH WATER TABLE I CEMENTED PAN I BEDROCK ISUBSIDENCE IHYOIPOTENT'LI
I DEPTH I KIND IMONTHS IDEPTHIHARDNESSIDEPTH IHARONESSIINIT.ITOTALIGRPI FROST I

)HNS SERIES NCO073
SANITARY FACILITIES (A) CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL (A)
ISEVERE-WETNESS,POOR FILTER II (FAIR -WETNESS I
IC TANK I II I I
—SORPTION I II ROADFILL I
FIELDS I II I I
ISEVERE-SEEPAGE,WETNESS II (PROBABLE
_I SEWAGE I _ II - I I
LAGOON I II SAND I I
_ AREAS I II I I
I I II I I
ISEVERE-SEEPAGE,WETNESS,T00 SANDY II (IMPROBABLE -TOO SANDY I
SANITARY I II I I
( LANDFILL I II GRAVEL I I
(TRENCH) I II I I
,.
ISEVERE-SEEPAGE,WETNESS
II
ISL,FSL:FAIR-THIN LAYER I
I SANITARY
I
II
ILS,LFS:FAIR-T00 SANDY,THIN LAYER I
LANDFILL
I
II TOPSOIL
I I
(AREA)
I
II
Ilxxx
I I
I
I
I I
_
(POOR-SEEPAGE,T00 SANDY
II
DAILY
I
II
WATER MANAGEMENT (A)
COVER FOR
I
I
ISEVERE-SEEPAGE I
I LANDFILL
I
II POND
I I
I
II RESERVOIR
I
_ I
I AREA
I I
BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT (A)
II
I I
ISEVERE-CUTBANKS CAVE,WETNESS
II
ISEVERE-SEEPAGE,PIPING,WETNESS I
SHALLOW
I
IIEMBANKMENTS
I I
(EXCAVATIONS
I
II DIKES AND•.
I - I
'.,
I
I I LEVEES
I I
Lr
INONE:MODERATE-WETNESS
II
ISEVERE-CUTBANKS CAVE I
I DWELLINGS
IRARE:SEVERE-FLOODING
II EXCAVATED
I I
WITHOUT
I
II PONDS
I I
• ,BASEMENTS
I
I
I'IAQUIFER FED
II
I I
I I
INONE:SEVERE-WETNESS
II
ICUTBANKS CAVE I
DWELLINGS
IRARE:SEVERE-FLOODING,WETNESS
II
I I
I WITH
I
II DRAINAGE
I I
_l BASEMENTS
I
I
II
II
I I
I I
'
INONE:MODERATE-WETNESS
II
ISL,FSL:WETNESS,DROUGHTY,SOIL BLOWING I
I SMALL
IRARE:SEVERE-FLOODING
II
ILS,LFS:WETNESS,DROUGHTY,FAST INTAKE I
(COMMERCIAL
I
II IRRIGATION
I I
BUILDINGS
I
II
I I
I
I
Ilxxx
I
INONE:MOOERATE-WETNESS
_ II
IWETNESS,TOO SANOY,SOIL BLOWING I
LOCAL
IRARE:MODERATE-WETNESS,FLOODING
II TERRACES
I I
-j ROADS AND
I
II AND
I I
I STREETS
I
II DIVERSIONS
I I
'AWNS, IMODERATE-WETNESS,DROUGHTY II ILS,LFS:DROUGHTY,ROOTING DEPTH
I. .aSCAPING I II GRASSED ISL,FSL:OR000HTY
AND GOLF I II WATERWAYS
FAIRWAYS I I.
I I Ilxxx I �

jHNS SERIES NC0073
RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (A)
INONE:MODERATE-WETNESS IMODERATE-WETNESS I
[RARE:SEVERE-FLOODING ['I I I
I _.AP AREAS I IIPLAYGROUNDS I I
I II I I
IMODERATE-WETNESS 11 IMODERATE-WETNESS I
I I II PATHS I I
'ICNIC AREASI II AND I I
I II TRAILS I I
REGIONAL INTERPRETATIONS
I I
I I
CLASS-
I CAPA- ICOTTON
ICORN ISOYBEANS ITOBACCO
(WHEAT
[GRASS- IPASTURE I
DETERMINING
I BILITY ILINT
I I
I
I
ILEGUME HAY I I
PHASE
I I(LBS)
I(BU) I(BU)
I(LBS)
I(BU)
I(TONS) I(AUM) [
INIRRIIRR.INIRR IIRR.
INIRR IIRR. INIRR
IIRR. INIRR IIRR.
INIRR IIRR.
INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. [
�.LL
(
[ 2W 1 1650 I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
1120 I 145
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I 12700 I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
150 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
15.4 I 19.0 I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I
I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
WOODLAND SUITABILITY (B)
CLASS-
[ORDI MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS
I POTENTIAL PRODUCTIVITY
[ I
DETERMINING
ISYMIEROS'NIEQUIP.ISEEDL.IWINDTHIPLANT
I COMMON TREES
ISITEIPROD[
TREES TO PLANT I
PHASE
I IHAZARDILIMIT
IMORT'YIHAZARDICOMPETI
IINDXICLASI
I
[ALL
19A ISLIGHTISLIGHTISLIGHTISLIGHTIMODER.ILOBLOLLY
PINE
188
19
ILOBLOLLY PINE I
[ I [
[ [ I
[LONGLEAF PINE
161
14
I I
I I [
[ I I
ISWEETGUM
I
I
I I
I
ISLASH PINE
I
I
I [
IWATER OAK
I
I
I [
i
I I I
I I I
IWILLOW OAK
I
I
I I
I
IAMERICAN SYCAMORE
I
I
I I
[ [ [
[ I I
IWATER OAK
I
I
I I
[ I I
[ I I
IWILLOW OAK
I
I
I I
I
I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I

DHNS SERIES NC0073
DLASS-OETERMIN'G PHASEI SPECIES IHTI SPECIES IHTI SPECIES IHTI SPECIES IHTI
I NONE I I I I I I I I
I II II II II
I II II II II
I II II II II
I II II II II
WILDLIFE HABITAT SUITABILITY (C)
CLASS- I POTENTIAL FOR HABITAT ELEMENTS I POTENTIAL AS HABITAT FOR: I
DETERMINING IGRAIN &IGRASS &I WILD IHARDWD ICONIFERISHRUBS IWETLANDISHALLOWIOPENLD IWOOOLD IWETLANDIRANGELDI
PHASE I SEED ILEGUME 1 HERB. I TREES (PLANTS I IPLANTS I WATER IWILDLF IWILDLF IWILDLF IWILDLF I
'ALL IFAIR IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD I IPOOR IV. POORIGOOD [GOOD IV. POORI
) I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
POTENTIAL NATIVE PLANT COMMUNITY (RANGELAND OR FOREST UNDERSTORY VEGETATION)
I PLANT [ PERCENTAGE COMPOSTION (DRY WEIGHT) BY CLASS DETERMINING PHASE I
COMMON PLANT NAME I SYMBOL I I I I I I
I (NLSPN) I I I I I I
AMERICAN HOLLY IILOP I I I I I I
,FLOWERING DOGWOOD ICOFL2 I I I I I I
_IBLUERIDGE BLUEBERRY IVAVA I I I I I I
GREENBRIER ISMILA2 I I I I I I
.PERSIMMON IDIVI5 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
POTENTIAL PRODUCTION (LBS./AC. DRY WT): I I
FAVORABLE YEARS [ [ I I I I
Ll_NORMAL YEARS. S.I I I [ I I
iUNFAVORABLE YEARS I I I I I
FOOTNOTES
RATINGS BASED ON NSH, SETION 603, 7-83.
WOODLAND RATINGS BASED ON NATIONAL FORESTRY MANUAL, SEP. 1980.
C WILDLIFE RATINGS BASED ON SOILS MEMORANDUM-74, JAN 1972.
FTHIS IS A RATING OVERRIDE. SEE THE INTERPRETATION OVERRIDE FILE FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THIS OVERRIDE.
J

W06-IM"I I

LOCATION JOHNSTON
NC+AL DE FL GA MD MS SC VA
Established Series
Rev. HJB:DLN:AG
12/91
JOHNSTON SERIES
The Johnston series consists of very deep, very poorly drained soils on
nearly level flood plains. They formed in loamy recent alluvium. Near
the type location, mean annual temperature is 63 degrees F., and mean
annual precipitation is 46 inches.. Slopes range from 0 to 2 percent.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Coarse -loamy, siliceous, acid, thermic Cumulic
Humaquepts
TYPICAL PEDON: Johnston mucky loam --forested. (Colors are for moist
soil unless otherwise stated.)
A--0 to 30 inches; black (10YR 2/1) mucky loam high in organic
matter; massive; friable; very strongly acid; abrupt smooth boundary.
(24 to 48 inches thick)
Cgl--30 to 34 inches; dark gray (10YR 4/1) loamy fine sand; single
grained; loose; very strongly acid; abrupt smooth boundary. (0 to 20
inches thick)
Cg2--34 to 60 inches; gray (10YR 5/1) fine sandy loam; lenses and
pockets of loamy sand and sand; massive; very friable; dark colored loam
in old root channels; very strongly acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Scotland County, North Carolina; 3 miles south of
Wagram; 50 feet west of Shoe Heel Creek; 1 1/2 miles north of Lee's
pond; 25 feet south of a paved road.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Reaction
except for surface layers that have
inches of recent alluvial sediments
horizon.
is very strongly or strongly acid
been limed. Some pedons have a few
deposited over the dark colored A
The A horizon has hue of 10YR to 5Y or is neutral, value of 2 or 3, and
chroma of 0 to 2. The A horizon is mucky loam, loam, fine sandy loam,
or sandy loam. Organic matter content of the A horizon ranges from 8 to
18 percent.
The Cg horizon has hue of 10YR to 5Y or it is neutral, value of 4 to 7,
and chroma of 0 to 2. It is commonly loam, fine sandy loam, sandy loam,
loamy sand, sand, or loamy fine sand. Thin strata of sandy clay loam
are in some pedons.
COMPETING SERIES: There are no other series in this family. Bibb,
Ballahack, Murville, Pamlico, Pocomoke, Rutlege, Torhunta, and Toxaway
series are in closely related families. Ballahack and Toxaway soils
have 18 to 35 percent clay in the 10- to 40-inch control section. In
addition, Toxaway soils are in a mesic family. Bibb soils have an
ochric epipedon. Murville, Pamlico, and Rutlege soils are in a sandy
family. Pocomoke and Torhunta soils have umbric epipedons less than 24
inches thick.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING:' Johnston soils are on nearly level flood plains

PAGE 02
along streams of the Coastal Plain. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. The
soil formed in loamy recent alluvium. Near the type location the mean
- annual temperature is 63 degrees F., and mean annual rainfall is 46
inches.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: In addition to the competing series
are the Duplin, Dunbar, Faceville, Goldsboro, Lakeland, Marlboro,
Norfolk, Osier, and Wagram'series. All of these soils except Lakeland
have argillic horizons and are better drained. Lakeland soils have
sandy texture throughout,
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Very poorly drained; very slow runoff;
moderately rapid permeability in the A horizon and rapid permeability in
the Cg horizon.
USE AND VEGETATION: Dominantly woodlands of water tupelo, swamp tupelo,
sweetgum, water oak, pond pine, and bald cypress. A few areas have been
cleared, drained, and used for growing corn, soybeans, and pasture.
i
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: South Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain. The
series is of moderate extent.
i
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Johnston County, North Carolina; 1911.
REMARKS: Diagnostic horizons and features recognized in this pedon are:
Umbric epipedon - the zone from the surface to a depth of 30 inches (A
horizon)
Cumulic subgroup feature --an umbric epipedon thicker than 24 inches -
_, the zone from the surface to a depth of 30 inches (A horizon)
MLRA(S): 133A,.153A, 153B, 153C SIR: NCO043
National Cooperative Soil Survey
U.S.A.

;0043 SOIL I NTERPRETAT IONS RECORD
JOHNSTON SERIES
RA(S): 133A, 153A, 137, 149A, 153B, 153C
ENH,RAG, 2-89
CL..,,LIC HUMAQUEPTS, COARSE -LOAMY, SILICEOUS, ACID, THERMIC
JE JOHNSTON SERIES CONSISTS OF VERY POORLY DRAINED SOILS ON NEARLY LEVEL FLOOD PLAINS OF THE COASTAL PLAIN. TYPICALLY
..JEY HAVE BLACK MUCKY LOAM OR LOAM SURFACE LAYERS, 30 INCHES THICK, AND GRAY FINE SANDY LOAM UNDERLYING LAYERS. THEY
FORMED IN STRATIFIED FLUVIAL SEDIMENTS. SLOPES RANGE FROM 0-2 PERCENT.
LANDSCAPE AND CLIMATE PROPERTIES I I
ANNUAL AIR I FROST FREE I ANNUAL I ELEVATION I DRAINAGE I SLOPE
--------------
ESTIMATED SOIL PROPERTIES (A)
I'IEPTHI
I
I
IFRACT.IFRACT.IPERCENT
OF
MATERIAL
LESS
ICLAY I
IN.)1 USDA TEXTURE
I UNIFIED-
I AASHTO
1>10 IN13-IOIN1 THAN
3" PASSING SIEVE NO.1
I
I
I
I
((PCT)
1(PCT)
I 4
1 10
I 40
I 200
I(PCT)1
I0-30 1MK-L
IOL,ML,CL-ML
IA-4,A-5,A-7-5,A-6
1 0
1 0
1100
100
90-100
51-75
17-18 1
I-30 IL,SL,FSL
IML,SM
IA-2,A-4
1 0
1 0
1100
100
60-100
18-65
15-18 1
J0-341SR-LS-S
ISM,SP-SM
IA-2,A-3
1 0
1 0
1100
100
50-100
5-30
12-12 1
134-601SR-FSL-SL
I
1SM
I
IA-2,A-4
.I
1 0
I _
1 0
I
1100
I
100
50-100
25-49
15-20 1
I I
.jEPTHILIQUID
1PLAS- I
MOIST BULK I
PERMEA-
I AVAILABLE I
SOIL I SALINITY I SAR I CEC I CAC03 I GYPSUM I
I(IN.)I LIMIT
ITICITYI
DENSITY I
BILITY
WATER CAPACITY(
REACTION I I I I I I
I
(INDEX 1
(G/CM3) I
(IN/HR)
I (IN/IN) I
(PH) 1(MMHOS/CM)1 1(ME/1000)1 (PCT) I (PCT) 1
-30 1 20-45
1 2-14 1
1.25-1.45 1
2.0-6.0
1 0.20-0.26 1
4.5-5.5 1 1 1 1 1 1
10-40 1 15-35
INP-10 1
1.30-1.55 1
2.0-6.0
1 0.10-0.20 1
4.5-5.5 1 I I I I I
41
1 NP 1
1.55-1.65 1
6.0-20
1 0.02-0.07 1
4.5-5.5 1
114-601 15-35
INP-10 1
1.45-1.65 1
6.0-20
1 0.06-0.12 1
4.5-5.5 1 1 1 1 I 1
I I
I I
I
I I
I I I I I I
VTHIORGANICI SHRINK- I EROSION IWIND I WIND I CORROSIVITY 1
-„IN.)IMATTER 1 SWELL I FACTORS IEROD.1 EROD. I 1
1-30 1 8-18 1 LOW 1.171.171 5 1 5 1 56 1
''_,1I-30 1 3.8 1 LOW 1.201.201 5 1 5 1 56 1
130-341 1 LOW 1.171.171 1 1 1
_,..14-601 1 LOW 1.171.171
FLOODING I HIGH WATER TABLE I CEMENTED PAN I BEDROCK ISUBSIDENCE 1HYDIPOTENT'L1
I DEPTH I KIND IMONTHS I DEPTH I HARDNESS I DEPTH IHARDNESS IINIT. ITOTALIGRPI FROST I

�HNSTON SERIES NCO043
SANITARY FACILITIES (B)
CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL (8)
'
ISEVERE-FLOODING,PONDING,POOR FILTER
(POOR -WETNESS I
'IC TANK
I
II
I I
�oSORPTION
I
II ROADFILL
I I
I FIELDS
II
I I
I
II
I I
ISEVERE-SEEPAGE,FLOODING,PONDING
II
(IMPROBABLE -EXCESS FINES I
I SEWAGE
I
II
I I
LAGOON
I
II SAND
I I
AREAS
I
II
I I
I
I
II
I I
ISEVERE-FLOODING,SEEPAGE,PONDING
II
(IMPROBABLE -EXCESS FINES I
SANITARY
I
II
I I
LANDFILL
I
II GRAVEL
I I
I (TRENCH)
I
II
I I
I
II
I I
ISEVERE-FLOODING,SEEPAGE,PONDING
II
(POOR -WETNESS I
I SANITARY
I
II
I
' LANDFILL
I
II TOPSOIL
I I
(AREA)
I
II
I I
SPOOR-PONDING
�I
,
DAILY
I
II
WATER MANAGEMENT (8)
COVER FOR
I
II
ISEVERE-SEEPAGE I
I LANDFILL
I
II POND
I I
I
II RESERVOIR
I I
II AREA
I I
_
BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT (B)
I
I I
IL,SL,FSL:SEVERE-CUTBANKS CAVE,PONDING
II
ISEVERE-PIPING,PONDING I
SHALLOW
IMK-L:SEVERE-CUTBANKS CAVE,EXCESS HUMUS,
IIEMBANKMENTS
I I
�I,XCAVATIONS
I PONDING
II DIKES AND
I I
I_
I
II LEVEES
I I
IL,SL,FSL:SEVERE-FLOODING,PONDING II ]SEVERE-CUTBANKS CAVE
DWELLINGS IMK-L:SEVERE-FLOODING,PONDING,LOW STRENGTH II EXCAVATED I
WITHOUT I II PONDS I
BASEMENTS I IIAQUIFER FED I
ISEVERE-FLOODING,PONDING II IPONDING,FLOODING
DWELLINGS I II I
- WITH I II DRAINAGE I
I BASEMENTS I II I
SMALL
COMMERCIAL
BUILDINGS
LOCAL
'ROADS AND
STREETS
IL,SL,FSL:SEVERE-FLOODING,PONDING II IMK-L:PONDING,FLOODING
IMK-L:SEVERE-FLOODING,PONDING,LOW STRENGTH II IL,SL,FSL:PONDING,DROUGHTY,FLOODING
I II IRRIGATION I
I II I
SEVERE-PONDING,FLOODING
I
I
I
IPONDING
TERRACES I
AND I
DIVERSIONS I
'AWNS, IOCCAS:SEVERE-PONDING II INK-L:WETNESS
�. .JSCAPING IFREQ:SEVERE-PONOING,FLOODING II GRASSED IL,SL,FSL:WETNESS,OROUGHTY
AND GOLF I II WATERWAYS I
FAIRWAYS I II I

)HNSTON SERIES NCO043
RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (B)
SEVERE-FLOODING,PONDING II [OCCAS:SEVERE-PONDING I
II IFREQ:SEVERE-PONDING,FLOODING [
j AMP AREAS I [[PLAYGROUNDS I I
I II 1 I
SEVERE-PONDING
I I
'ICNIC AREASI
I
ISEVERE-PONDING
PATHS I
AND I
TRAILS I
CLASS-
I CAPA-
ICORN
[SOYBEANS
[PASTURE I I I I I
DETERMINING
[ BILITY
I
I
I I I I I I
PHASE
[
I(BU)
I(BU)
I(AUM) I I I I I
1-
INIRRIIRR.INIRR
IIRR. INIRR IIRR.
INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR INIRR IIRR I
"INDRAINED,FREQ
17W I
I
I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
IRAINED,OCCAS 14W 1 1 80 1 1 40 1 1 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
CLASS-
IORDI MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS I POTENTIAL PRODUCTIVITY
I I
DETERMINING
ISYMIEROS'NIEQUIP.ISEEDL.IWINDTHIPLANT I COMMON TREES
ISITEIPRODI
TREES TO PLANT I
{ PHASE
I IHAZARDILIMIT IMORT'YIHAZARDICOMPETI
IINDXICLASI
I
TALL
17W ISLIGHTISEVEREISEVEREISEVEREISEVEREIYELLOW-POPLAR
194
17
IGREEN ASH I
I I I I I I ILOBLOLLY PINE
1106
112
ILOBLOLLY PINE /I
I I I I I I 1SWEETGUM
194
18
ISWEETGUM I
A
I I I I I I IWATER OAK
1103
17
IBALDCYPRESS I
-I-
I I I I I I IWATER TUPELO
I
I
I I
I I I I I I [SWAMP TUPELO
I
I
I I
-
I I I I I I IBALDCYPRESS
I
I
I I
I
I I I I I I I
I
I
I I

HNSTON SERIES - NCO043
-LASS-DETERMIN'G PHASEI SPECIES IHTI SPECIES IHTI SPECIES IHTI SPECIES IHTI
NONE I I I I I I I I
I II II II II
I II II II II
I II II II II
I II II II II
CLASS- I POTENTIAL FOR HABITAT ELEMENTS I POTENTIAL AS HABITAT FOR: I
DETERMINING IGRAIN &IGRASS &I WILD IHARDWD ICONIFERISHRUBS IWETLANDISHALLOWIOPENLD IWOODLD IWETLANDIRANGELDI
PHASE I SEED ILEGUME I HERB. I TREES IPLANTSI IPLANTS I WATER IWILOLF IWILDLF IWILDLF IWILDLF I
INORAINED,FREQ IV. POORIPOOR IPOOR IPOOR -IPOOR I IGOOD IGOOD IPOOR IPOOR IGOOD I I
,JRAINED,OCCAS IFAIR IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD I IPOOR. IPOOR IGOOD IGOOD IPOOR I I.
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I PLANT I PERCENTAGE COMPOSTION (DRY WEIGHT) BY CLASS DETERMINING PHASE I
COMMON PLANT NAME I SYMBOL I I
I (NLSPN) I I I I I I
NKBERRY IILGL I I I I I I
,..MERICAN HOLLY IILOP I I I I I I
IGREENBRIER ISMILA2 I I I I I I
WITCHCANE IARTE4- I I I I I I
OWNY BLUEBERRY IVAAT* I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
POTENTIAL PRODUCTION (LBS./AC. DRY WT): I I
' FAVORABLE YEARS I I I I I I
NORMAL YEARS
UNFAVORABLE YEARS I I I I I I
FOOTNOTES
ESTIMATES OF ENGINEERING PROPERTIES BASED ON 1 PEDON FROM CUPLIN COUNTY, NC.0 ADDITIONAL AASHTO ENGTIES FOR LINENI
! ARE A-7-6. .
B RATINGS BASED ON NSH, SECTION 603, 7-83. -
WOODLAND RATINGS BASED ON NATIONAL FORESTRY MANUAL, SEP. 1980.
WILDLIFE RATINGS BASED ON SOILS MEMORANDUM-74, JAN. 1972.
I- PLANT TREES ONLY ON AREAS WITH ADEQUATE -WATER MANAGEMENT.
CHRISTMAS TREE SPECIES

KALMIA
1_j

LOCATION KALMIA
NC+AL AR DE FL GA LA SC VA
Established Series
Rev. REH:ENH
8/87
KALMIA SERIES
The Kalmia series consists of well drained, nearly level and gently
sloping soils on fluvial terraces of the Coastal Plain. They have
formed in loamy marine and fluvial sediments. Slopes range from 0 to 6
percent.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Fine -loamy over sandy or sandy -skeletal, siliceous,
thermic Typic Hapludults
TYPICAL PEDON: Kalmia loamy sand - cultivated. '(Colors are for moist
soil unless otherwise stated.)
Ap--O to 8 inches, grayish brown (10YR 5/2) loamy sand; weak medium
granular structure; very friable, few fine roots; strongly acid; abrupt
smooth boundary. (6 to 10 inches thick)
E--8 to 12 inches, light yellowish brown (2.5Y 6/4) loamy sand;
weak medium granular structure; very friable; strongly acid; clear
smooth boundary. (0 to 10 inches thick) Bt1--12 to 14 inches,
brownish yellow (10YR 6/6) sandy loam; weak medium subangular blocky
structure; friable,• few fine roots; strongly acid; clear wavy boundary.
(0 to 6 inches thick)
Bt2--14 to 27 inches, brownish yellow (10YR 6/6) sandy clay loam;
weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable, common fine and medium
pores; few thin discontinuous clay films; few fine flakes of mica; few
fine fragments of quartz; strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary. (8 to
30 inches thick)
BC--27 to 32 inches, brownish yellow (10YR 6/6) sandy clay loam;
few medium strong brown (7.5YR 5/8) and pale brown (10YR 6/3) mottles;
weak fine subangular blocky structure; friable, common lenses and
pockets of sandy loam and loamy sand; few pebbles of quartz; very
strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary. (4 to 8 inches thick)
2C--32 to 60 inches, mottled light yellowish brown (10YR 6/4), pale
brown (10YR 6/3), very pale brown (10YR 7/3, 7/4), and light brownish
gray (10YR 6/2) loamy sand; few streaks of strong brown (7.5YR 5/8)
sandy loam; single grained; loose; common fine pebbles and coarse sand
pockets at 52 inches; very strongly acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Scotland County, North Carolina; 4 miles north of Maxton
on county road 1407, 3/8 mile east of Laurinburg-Maxton Airbase hangar.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Solum thickness ranges from 20 to 40 inches.
The soil ranges from very strongly to moderately acid throughout, unless
limed. Few to common fine flakes of mica are present in some pedons.
The Ap or Al horizon has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, or it is neutral, value of
4 to 6, and chroma of 0 to 3. Texture is loamy sand, loamy fine sand,
sandy loam, or fine sandy loam.
The E horizon has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 5 to 8, and chroma of 2

PAGE 02
to 6. Texture is similar to the A or Ap horizon.
The BE horizon, where present, has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 4 to 7,
and chroma of 3 to 6. Texture is sandy loam, fine sandy loam, or loam.
The Bt horizon has hue of 7.5Y to 2.5Y, value of 5 to 7, and chroma of 4
to 8. Texture is sandy clay loam, loam, or sandy loam.
The B/C or BC horizon has similar matrix color as the BT horizon. High
Chroma mottles are present in most pedons. Texture is sandy clay loam,
loam, sandy loam, or fine sandy loam.
The C horizon has hue of 7.5YR to 2.5Y, value of 5 to 8, and chroma of 1
to 8 or it is mottled. Texture is sand, fine sand, loamy sand, or loamy
fine sand but thin strata of fine sandy loam, sandy loam, or clay loam
are in some pedons below depth of 40 inches.
COMPETING SERIES: The Maxton series is in the same family. Apison,
Cahaba, Durham, Emporia, Granville, Hartsells, Johns, Kempsville,
Kenansville, Linker, Norfolk, Rumford, Wagram, and Wickham series. The
Maxton, Cahaba, and Wickham soils have colors of 2.5YR to 5YR in the Bt
horizon. Also, Cahaba soils contain more silt. Apison, Hartsells, and
Linker soils have bedrock within 20 to 40 inches of the soil surface.
-_ Durham, Emporia, and Granville soils lack sandy C horizons. Also, these
three soils and the Kempsville, Norfolk, and Wagram soils have thicker
solum. Also, Wagram soils and the Kempsville soils have a sandy
epipedon 20 to 40 inches thick. Johns soils are somewhat poorly to
moderately well drained. Rumford soils have a coarse -loamy particle
size control section. State and Wickham soils have mixed mineralogy.
Suffolk soils lack the contrasting sandy or sandy skeletal particle size
class.
-- GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: The Kalmia soils are on fluvial terraces of the
Coastal Plain. Slopes are between 0 and 6 percent. The soil formed in
sandy marine or fluvial deposits. Mean annual temperature near the type
location is about 61 degrees F., and mean annual rainfall is 47.7
inches.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: In addition to the competing Johns.,
Kempsville, and Maxton series, these are the Lumbee and Pactolus series.
Kalmia soils have better drainage than the Lumbee and Pactolus soils,
and are on the higher places on the landscape.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Well drained; runoff is medium and internal
drainage is medium; permeability is moderate. A seasonal high water
table is below 6 feet except for the wet substratum phase which is more
than 3 feet.
USE AND VEGETATION: Mostly cleared and cultivated. The soil is used
for growing corn, cotton, peanuts, tobacco, and truck crops. Forested
areas are mainly in loblolly pines, but they include some mixed
hardwoods as yellow -poplar, sweetgum, southern red oak, and American
holly.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Coastal Plain of Virginia, North Carolina,
South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Delaware and Alabama. The series is
of moderate extent.

PAGE 03
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Autauga County, Alabama; 1908. 1,
REMARKS: Diagnostic horizons and features recognized in this pedon are:
Ochric epipedon - the zone from the surface to a depth of 12 inches (the
Ap and E horizons)
Argillic horizon - the zone from a depth of 12 to 27 inches (the Btl and
Bt2 horizons)
National Cooperative Soil Survey
U.S.A.
G
l
0

0074 SOIL .I NTERPRETAT I ONS RECORD KALMIA SERIES
RA(S): 133A, 153A, 1538, 1338, 149A, 153C
REH, 4-84
T,. .t: HAPLUDULTS, FINE -LOAMY OVER SANDY OR SANDY -SKELETAL, SILICEOUS, THERMIC
E KALMIA SERIES CONSISTS OF NEARLY LEVEL AND GENTLY SLOPING, WELL DRAINED SOILS ON STREAM TERRACES IN THE COASTAL
.-AIN. IN A REPRESENTATIVE PROFILE, THE SURFACE LAYER IS GRAYISH BROWN LOAMY SAND, ABOUT 8 INCHES THICK. THE SUBSURFACE
LAYER IS LIGHT YELLOWISH BROWN LOAMY SAND 4 INCHES THICK. THE SUBSOIL EXTENDS TO A DEPTH OF 32 INCHES. IT IS BROWNISH
LLOW SANDY CLAY LOAM. THE UNDERLYING LAYER, TO A DEPTH OF 60 INCHES, IS MOTTLED LOAMY SAND. SLOPES RANGE FROM 0 TO 6
RCENT.
LANDSCAPE AND CLIMATE
PROPERTIES
I
ANNUAL AIR
I FROST FREE
ANNUAL
ELEVATION
I
DRAINAGE
SLOPE
TEMPERATURE
DAYS I PRECIPITATION I
(FT)
I
CLASS
I
(PCT) I
I
I
I
W
I
0-6
ESTIMATED SOIL PROPERTIES (A)
,_EPTHI
1
1
IFRACT.IFRACT.IPERCENT
OF MATERIAL
LESS
ICLAY I
I(IN.)[ USDA
TEXTURE I UNIFIED
I AASHTO
1>10 INI3-IOINI THAN 3" PASSING SIEVE NO.1
I
I
I
I
1(PCT)
I(PCT)
I 4 1 10 1
40
1 200
1(PCT)I
-14 1LS,LFS
[SM,SC-SM
[A-2
1 0
1 0
1100 95-100
50-75
15-35
14-12 1
I0-14 ISL,FSL
ISM,SC,SC-SM
[A-2,A-4
1 0
I 0
1100 95-100
70-85
20-49
10-15 1
'-4-321SCL,L,SL
ISC,SC-SM
IA-2,A-4,A-6
1 0
1 0
1100 95-100
70-100
30-49
118-351
2-601LS,S
1 I
ISM,SP-SM,SP
I
IA-2,A-3
I
1 0
I
1 0
I
1100 95-100
I
50-70
4-35
12-10 1
I I
EPTHILIQUID
IPLAS- I
MOIST BULK I
PERMEA- I AVAILABLE I SOIL I SALINITY I
SAR I CEC I CAC03 I GYPSUM I
_IN.)[ LIMIT
ITICITYI
DENSITY I
BILITY IWATER CAPACITY( REACTION I I
I I I I
I
(INDEX I
(G/CM3) I
(IN/HR) I (IN/IN) I (PH) I(MMHOS/CM)1
1(ME/100G)1 (PCT) I (PCT) I
I
I NP 1
1.60-1.75 1
2.0-6.0 1 0.06-0.10 1 4.5-6.0 I I
I I I [
-14 1 15-30
INP-10 1
1.45-1.65 1
2.0-6.0 1 0.10-0.15 1 4.5-6.0 I I
I I I 1
114-321 20-35
1 4-15 1
1.40-1.60 1
0.6-2.0 1 0.12-0.16 1 4.5-5.5 I I
I I I [
' "2-601
I
I NP 1
I I
1.60-1.75 1
I
6.0-20 1 0.03-0.06 1 4.5-5.5 I I
I I I I
1' I I 1
I I I I
IDEPTHIORGANICI SHRINK-
I EROSION
IWIND I WIND I CORROSIVITY 1
IN.)114ATTER
I SWELL
I FACTORS
IER00.1 EROD. I I
I (PCT)
(POTENTIAL( K I Kf1 T
IGROUPI INDEX I STEEL (CONCRETE(
I0-14 1 .5-2
I LOW
1.151.151 5
1 I IMODERATEIMODERATEI '
-14 1 .5-2
I LOW
1.201.201 5
1 I I'
4-32I
I LOW
1.241.241 1 I
'I'a2-601
I LOW
1.101.101
I
I
I I I
FLOODING
I HIGH WATER TABLE I CEMENTED PAN I BEDROCK (SUBSIDENCE 1HYDIPOTENT'L[
1
I DEPTH I KIND .[MONTHS IDEPTHIHARDNESSIDEPTH
IHARDNESSIINIT.ITOTALIGRPI FROST I
NONE- RARE( 1 1 >6.0 1 1 1 1 1 >60 1 1 1 1 B 1 1

LMIA SERIES
NCO074
SANITARY FACILITIES (B) CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL (B)
ISLIGHT II IGOOD I
IC TANK II
,,.SORPTION I I ROADFILL I I
I FIELDS
INONE:SEVERE-SEEPAGE II (PROBABLE
I SEWAGE IRARE:SEVERE-SEEPAGE,FLCODING II I
LAGOON I II SAND I
AREAS I II I
' ISEVERE-SEEPAGE,T00 SANDY II (IMPROBABLE -TOO SANDY
SANITARY I II I
LANDFILL I I GRAVEL I
_I (TRENCH) I I I
ISEVERE-SEEPAGE
II
ISL,FSL:FAIR-THIN LAYER
I SANITARY
I
II
ILS,LFS:FAIR-T00 SANDY,THIN LAYER
LANDFILL
I
II TOPSOIL
I
(AREA)
I
II
I
I
I
II***
I
IPOOR-SEEPAGE,T00 SANDY
DAILY
I
I
WATER MANAGEMENT (B)
COVER FOR
I
I
ISEVERE-SEEPAGE
LANDFILL
I
I POND
I
I
II RESERVOIR
AREA
I
BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT (B)
I
I
ISEVERE-CUTBANKS CAVE
II
ISEVERE-SEEPAGE,PIPING
SHALLOW
I
IL.EMBANKMENTS
I
ItXCAVATIONS,I
II DIKES AND
I
LEVEES
I
l .
INONE:SLIGHT
II
ISEVERE-NOWATER
I DWELLINGS
IRARE:SEVERE-FLOODING
II EXCAVATED
I
WITHOUT
II PONDS
I
' +BASEMENTS
I
((AQUIFER FED
I
' INONE:SLIGHT
' DWELLINGS IRARE:SEVERE-FLOODING
WITH
(_BASEMENTS
II IDEEP TO WATER
II I
II DRAINAGE I
II I
I0-4%NONE:SLIGHT II I0-3%SL,FSL:FAVORABLE I
I SMALL I4-6%NONE:MODERATE-SLOPE II I3-6%SL,FSL:SLOPE I
COMMERCIAL IRARE:SEVERE-FLOODING II IRRIGATION I0-3%LS,LFS:DROUGHTY,FAST INTAKE I
BUILDINGS I II I3-6%LS,LFS:DROUGHTY,FAST INTAKE,SLOPE I
i I II•xx I 1
'- INONE:SLIGHT
LOCAL IRARE:MODERATE-FLOODING
ROADS AND I
STREETS I
II IT00 SANDY
II TERRACES I
II AND I
II DIVERSIONS I
'..AWNS, ILS,LFS:MODERATE-DROUGHTY II ILS,LFS:DROUGHTY I
I. .,OSCAPING ISL,FSL:SLIGHT II GRASSED ISL,FSL:FAVORABLE I
AND GOLF I II WATERWAYS I I
FAIRWAYS I II I I
i:xx I Il:xx I I

LMIA SERIES NCO074
RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (B)
INONE:SLIGHT II 10-2Y>:SLIGHT 1
IRARE:SEVERE-FLOODING II 12-6%:MODERATE-SLOPE 1
I MP AREAS I 11PLAYGROUNDS I I
ISLIGHT II ]SLIGHT
II PATHS 1
ICNIC AREASI II AND I
I ]I TRAILS I
REGIONAL INTERPRETATIONS
I I
� I I
CAPABILITY AND YIELDS PER ACRE OF CROPS AND PASTURE (HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT)
CLASS- I CAPA- ICOTTON ICORN ITOBACCO ISOYBEANS IWHEAT IGRASS IPASTURE I
DETERMINING I BILITY 1LINT I I I I IHAY I I
PHASE I I(LBS) I(BU) 1(LBS) H UI I(BU) I(TONS) I(AUM) 1
NIRR 11RR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR.
-2Y 1 1 1 1 750 1 1 110 1 12900 1 1 45 1 1 60 1 1 5.0 1 1 8.5 1 1
-6% 1 2E 1 1 700 1 1 100 1 12800 1 1 40 1 1 55 1 1 4.5 1 1 8.0 1 1
I I I I I I I I I I I I I] I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I f I I I I I I
- WOODLAND SUITABILITY (C)
I_ CLASS- 10RDI MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS I POTENTIAL PRODUCTIVITY 1 I
DETERMINING ISYMIEROS'NIEQUIP.ISEEDL.IWINDTHIPLANT I COMMON TREES ISITEIPRODI TREES TO PLANT I
L PHASE I IHAZARDILIMIT MORT'YIHAZARDICOMPETI IINDXICLASI I
.TALL 19A ISLIGHTISLIGHTISLIGHTI I.. ILOBLOLLY PINE 188 •19 ILOBLOLLY PINE I
I 1 I I I I ISLASH PINE 188 I11 [SLASH PINE I
] I I I I I ISWEETGUM 185 16 [YELLOW -POPLAR 1
I IYELLOW-POPLAR 196 17. ICHERRYBARK OAK 1
1 ISOUTHERN RED OAK I I I I
I I I I 1 I 1WHITE OAK I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I ] ] ] I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I

iLMIA SERIES
NCO074
. WINDBREAKS
:LASS-DETERMIN'G PHASEI SPECIES IHTI SPECIES IHTI SPECIES IHTI SPECIES IHTI
NONE I I I I I I I I
I � II II II II
I � II II II II.
I II II II II
I I I I I I I I I I
WILDLIFE HABITAT
CLASS- I POTENTIAL FOR HABITAT ELEMENTS 1 POTENTIAL AS HABITAT FOR: I
DETERMINING IGRAIN &IGRASS &I WILD IHARDWO I,CONIFERISHRUBS IWETLANDISHALLOWIOPENLO IWOODLD IWETLANDIRANGELDI
PHASE I SEED (LEGUME I HERB. I TREES IPLANTS I (PLANTS I WATER IWILOLF IWILDLF IWILDLF IWILDLF I
ILL IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD [GOOD I IPOOR IV. POORIGOOD IGOOD IV. POORI
I I [ [ [ I [ I I I' I I I
POTENTIAL NATIVE PLANT COMMUNITY (RANGELAND OR FOREST UNDERSTORY VEGETATION)
I PLANT I PERCENTAGE COMPOSTION (DRY WEIGHT) BY CLASS DETERMINING PHASE I
COMMON PLANT NAME I SYMBOL I I I I I I
IMERICAN HOLLY
JILOP I
[FLOWERING DOGWOOD
ICOFL2 I
1OERSIMMON
IDIVI5 I
IWARF BLUEBERRY
IVACA• I
,JREENBRIER
ISMILA2 I
1"'IRWOOD
IOXAR I
POTENTIAL PRODUCTION (LBS./AC. DRY WT): I I
FAVORABLE YEARS [ I I I I I
NORMAL YEARS
UNFAVORABLE YEARS I I I I I
FOOTNOTES
ESTIMATES OF ENGINEERING PROPERTIES BASED ON 2 PEDONS FROM BALDWIN CO., GA. AND LENOIR CO., N.C.
RATINGS BASED ON NSH, PART II, SECTION 403, 3-78.
C WOODLAND RATINGS BASED ON SOIL SURVEY INTERPRETATIONS FOR WOODLAND, PROGRESS REPT. W-16, 1-70.
WILDLIFE RATINGS BASED ON SOILS MEMORANDUM 74 JAN. 1972.
SITE INDEX IS A SUMMARY OF 5 OR MORE MEASUREMENTS ON THE SOIL.
'-*THIS IS A RATING OVERRIDE. SEE THE INTERPRETATION OVERRIDE FILE FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THIS OVERRIDE

LAKELAND

LOCATION LAKELAND FL+AL GA LA MD MS NC NJ SC VA
Established Series
Rev. AGH
6/92
LAKELAND SERIES
The Lakeland series consists of very deep, excessively drained, rapidly
permeable soils that formed in thick beds of eolian or marine sands.
Slopes are dominantly 0 to 12 percent but range to 85 percent in
dissected areas.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Thermic, coated Typic Quartzipsamments
TYPICAL PEDON: Lakeland sand --forested. (Colors are for moist soil.)
A--0 to 3 inches; very dark brown (10YR 3/2) crushed and rubbed
sand; single grained; loose; common uncoated sand grains; common fine
and medium roots; strongly acid, clear wavy boundary. (2 to 9 inches
thick)
C1--3 to 10 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) sand; common medium
faint yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) mottles; single grained; loose; common
fine and medium roots; few uncoated sand grains; strongly acid; gradual
wavy boundary.
C2--10 to 43 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/8) sand; single
grained; loose; few fine roots; few uncoated sand grains; strongly acid;
gradual wavy boundary.
C3--43 to 64 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/8) sand; few medium
faint pale brown (10YR 7/3, 7/4) mottles; single grained; loose; many
uncoated sand grains; strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
C4--64 to 80 inches; very pale brown (10YR 7/4) sand; few medium
distinct yellowish red (5YR 4/8) mottles; single grained; loose; many
uncoated sand grains; strongly acid. (The C horizon extends to 80
inches or more.)
TYPE LOCATION: Calhoun County, Florida; 6 miles west of Chason, Florida
on State Highway 274 NE1/4NE1/4, sec. 31, T. 2 N., R. 10 W.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: All horizons are sand or fine sand with 5 to
10 percent silt plus clay in the 10- to 40- inch control section. The
soil is very strongly acid through moderately acid throughout except
where limed.
The A horizon has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 3 to 5, and chroma of 1
to 4.
The C horizon has hue of 10YR, value of 4 to 7, and chroma of 3 to 8;
hue of 2.5Y, value of 7 or 8, and chroma of 4 to 8; or hue of 7-5YR or
5YR, value of 5 or 6, and chroma of 6 or S.
Most of the sand grains between 10 and 40 inches are coated. Small
pockets of light gray or white sand grains or yellow or brown mottles
may occur in some pedons below depths of 40 inches. Some pedons have an
A/C horizon that is a mixture of gray and yellowish brown.

PAGE 02
COMPETING SERIES: These are the Alaga., Alpin, Bigbee, Cainhoy,
Catpoint, Darden, Duffern,.Foxworth, Glentosh, Tonkawa and Wando series.
Alaga.and Darden soils have 10 to 25 percent silt plus clay in the 10
to 40 inch control section. Alpin and Catpoint soils have lamella that
totals less than 6 inches thick within depths of 80 inches. Bigbee and
Foxworth soils have a seasonal water table within depths of 48 inches.
Cainhoy soils have a Bh horizon. Duffern and Tonkawa soils are dry in
some parts of the moisture control section for more than 125 days.
Glentosh soils can have loamy fine sand textures and they are drier.
Wando soils are loamy fine sand or fine sand to a depth of 40 to 60
inches and commonly contain more silt plus clay.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Lakeland soils are on broad, nearly level to very
steep uplands in the Lower Coastal Plain. Slope gradients are commonly
0 to 12 percent but may range up to 85 percent in highly dissected
areas. The soil formed in marine, eolian, or fluvial sands. Mean
annual precipitation is about 45 to 60 inches and mean annual air
temperature is about 62 to 71 degrees F.
GEOGRAPHICALLY`ASSOCIATED SOILS: These are the competing Foxworth
soils, and Chipley, Kershaw, Kureb, Osier, Plummer, Troup, and Wakulla
soils. Chipley soils occur closer to streams or in hillside seep areas..
They have chroma of 2 or less between 20 and 40 inches and are
seasonally wet. Kureb soils occur in the coastal areas. They have less
than 5,percent silt plus clay in the 10- to 40- inch control section,
and they have light gray E horizons. Kershaw soils have less than 5
percent silt plus clay in the 10- to 40- inch control section. Osier
and Plummer soils are poorly drained and occur along drainageways. Troup
soils occur in the same landscape with Lakeland, and they have Bt
horizons. Wakulla soils have Bt horizons, and they occur on more gently
sloping areas of upland plains and stream terraces.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Excessively drained, rapid permeability,
slow runoff. Depth to seasonal water table is more than 80 inches.
'- USE AND VEGETATION: Natural vegetation consists of blackjack, turkey
and post oak; scattered longleaf pine; and an understory of creeping
bluestem, sandy bluestem, lopsided indiangrass, hairy panicum,
fringeleaf paspalum and native annual forbs. Many areas are cleared and
used for peanuts, watermelons., peaches, corn, tobacco, and tame pasture.
DISTRIBUTION AND'EXTENT: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain and sandhills
of the thermic belt from Texas to Virginia. The series is extensive.
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Alachua County, Florida; 1947.
REMARKS: Diagnostic horizons and features in this pedon:
Ochric epipedon - 0 to 3 inches (A horizon).
National Cooperative Soil Survey
U.S.A.

0001 S 0 1 L I NTERPRETAT IONS RECORD LAKELAND SERIES
RA(S): 133A, 137, 138, 152A, 153A, 133B, 153B, 149A,153C
AGH, 6-91
L.iC QUARTZIPSAMMENTS, THERMIC, COATED
E LAKELAND SERIES CONSISTS OF EXCESSIVELY DRAINED NEARLY LEVEL TO VERY STEEP SOILS ON COASTAL PLAIN UPLANDS.
TYPICALLY, THESE SOILS HAVE A VERY DARK GRAYISH BROWN SAND SURFACE LAYER ABOUT 3 INCHES THICK. YELLOWISH BROWN SAND
'!''CURS BETWEEN DEPTHS OF 3 AND 64 INCHES, AND BELOW 64 INCHES TO DEPTHS OF 90 INCHES OR MORE VERY PALE BROWN SAND
CURS. SLOPES RANGE FROM 0 TO 85 PERCENT.
LANDSCAPE AND CLIMATE PROPERTIES
ANNUAL AIR FROST FREE ANNUAL ELEVATION DRAINAGE �. SLOPE
TEMPERATURE I DAYS PRECIPITATION 1 (FT) I CLASS (PCT)
_ 62-71 I 240-310 45-60 1 40-300 I E 0-85
ESTIMATED SOIL PROPERTIES
EPTHI I I IFRACT.IFRACT.IPERCENT OF MATERIAL LESS ICLAY I
IIIN.)[ USDA TEXTURE I UNIFIED 'I AASHTO 1>10 IN13-1OINI THAN 3" -PASSING SIEVE NO.1 I
1 I 1(PCT) [(PCT) I 4 1 10 I 40 I 200 I(PCT)I
-43 IS,FS ISP-SM IA-3,A-2-4 1 0 1 0 190-100 90-100 60-100 5-12 1 2-8 1
_3-801S,FS 1SP,SP-SM IA-3,A-2-4 1 0 1 0 190-100 90-100 50-100 1-12 1 1-6 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
''EPTHILIQUID IPLAS- I MOIST BULK I PERMEA- I AVAILABLE I SOIL I SALINITY I SAR I CEC I CAC03 I GYPSUM I.
IN.)I LIMIT ITICITYI DENSITY I BILITY [WATER CAPACITY[ REACTION 1 1' 1 1 1 1
ID-43 I
I NP
1 1.35-1.65
1 6.0-20
1 0.05-0.09
1 4.5-6.0 1
0-2 1
1 1-15 1
301
1 NP
1 1.50-1.60
1 6.0-20
1 0.02-0.08
1 4.5-6.0 1
0-2 1
I .3-6 1
-IDEPTHIORGANICI SHRINK- I EROSION IWIND 1 WIND I CORROSIVITY I
"IN.)IMATTER I SWELL I FACTORS JEROD.1 EROD.
I (PCT) [POTENTIAL[ K I KI:1 T 1GROUPI INDEX I STEEL [CONCRETE[
-(-- 43 1 .5-1 1 LOW 1.101.101 5 1 1 1 180 1 LOW IMODERATEI
143-801 0-.5 1 LOW 1.101.101 1 1 1
I I [ I I I I 1
FLOODING I HIGH WATER TABLE L I CEMENTED PAN I BEDROCK (SUBSIDENCE 1HYDIPOTENT'LI
I DEPTH I KIND IMONTHS IDEPTHIHARDNESSIDEPTH IHARONESSIINIT.ITOTAL'IGRPI FROST I
FRFOUFNCY I DURATION (MONTHS I (FT) 1 1 1 (IN)1 I (IN) I I(IN) I(IN) I I ACTION I
NONE I I >6.0 I I >60 1 I I A I I

IKELAND SERIES FL0001
SANITARY FACILITIES (A) CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL (A)
I0-8%:SLIGHT II I0-15%:GOOD
'IC TANK I8-15%:MODERATE-SLOPE II I15-25%:FAIR-SLOPE I
,aSORPTION I15-85%:SEVERE-SLOPE II ROADFILL I25-85%:POOR-SLOPE I
FIELDS I II I I
xx 1 1 I I I I
I I0-1%:SEVERE-SEEPAGE II (PROBABLE
I SEWAGE I1-85%:SEVERE-SEEPA6E,SLOPE- II I
LAGOON I II. SAND I
AREAS I II I
I0-15%:SEVERE-SEEPAGE,T00 SANDY II (IMPROBABLE -TOO SANDY I
SANITARY I15-85%:SEVERE-SEEPAGE,SLOPE,TOO SANDY 11 I I
LANDFILL I II GRAVEL I I
(TRENCH)
I0-15%:SEVERE-SEEPAGE II I0-15%:POOR-TOO SANDY I
SANITARY I15-85%:SEVERE-SEEPAGE,SLOPE II I15-85%:POOR-TOO SANDY,SLOPE I
LANDFILL I II TOPSOIL I I
(AREA) I II I I
I0-15%:POOR-SEEPAGE,TOO SANDY
II
DAILY
I15-85%:POOR-SEEPAGE,TOO SANDY,SLOPE
II
WATER MANAGEMENT (A)
I COVER FOR
I
II
I0-8%:SEVERE-SEEPAGE I
LANDFILL
I
II POND
I8-85%:SEVERE-SEEPAGE,SLOPE I
I
II RESERVOIR
I I
II AREA
I I
BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT (A)
11
I I
I0-15%:SEVERE-CUTBANKS CAVE
11
ISEVERE-SEEPAGE I
SHALLOW
I15-85%:SEVERE-CUTBANKS CAVE,SLOPE
IIEMBANKMENTS
I I
(EXCAVATIONS
I
II DIKES AND-
I I
LEVEES
I I
I
II
I I
I
I0-8%:SLIGHT
II
ISEVERE-NO WATER I
l DWELLINGS
I8-15%:MODERATE-SLOPE
II EXCAVATED
I I
WITHOUT
I15-85%:SEVERE-SLOPE
II PONDS
I I
.. BASEMENTS
I
((AQUIFER FED
I I
I
I
II
I I
I0-8%:SLIGHT
II
IDEEP TO WATER I
DWELLINGS
I8-15%:MODERATE-SLOPE
I I
I WITH
I15-85%:SEVERE-SLOPE
II DRAINAGE
I I
-' BASEMENTS
I
II
I I
I
I,I
I I
`i
IO-4%:SLIGHT
II
I0-3%:DROUGHTY,FAST INTAKE I
1 SMALL
I4-8%:MODERATE-SLOPE
II
I3-85%:SLOPE,DROUGHTY,FAST INTAKE I
COMMERCIAL
I8-85%:SEVERE-SLOPE
II IRRIGATION
I I
_ BUILDINGS
I
II
I I
I0-8%:SLIGHT
II
I0-8%:TOO SANDY,SOIL BLOWING I
LOCAL
I8-15%:MODERATE-SLOPE
II TERRACES
I8-85%:SLOPE,TOO SANDY,SOIL BLOWING I
`INROADS AND
I15-85%:SEVERE-SLOPE
II AND
I I
STREETS
I
I
II DIVERSIONS
II
I I
I I
AWNS,
I0-8%FS:MODERATE-DROUGHTY
II
I0-8%:DROUGHTY I
I- ..JSCAPING
I8-15%FS:MODERATE-DROUGHTY,SLOPE
II GRASSED
I8-85%:SLOPE,DROUGHTY I
AND GOLF
10-8%S:MODERATE-DROUGHTY,TOO SANDY
11 WATERWAYS
I I
FAIRWAYS
I8-15%S:MODERATE-OROUGHTY,SLOPE,T00 SANDY
11
1 I

1KELAND SERIES FL0001
_ RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (A)
10-15%:SEVERE-TOO SANDY II I0-6%:SEVERE-T00 SANDY I
115-85%:SEVERE-SLOPE,TOO SANDY 16-85%:SEVERE-SLOPE,T00 SANDY I
[ CAMP AREAS I [[PLAYGROUNDS I I
I II I I
I 10-15%:SEVERE-TOO SANDY 11 10-25%:SEVERE-TOO SANDY
I 115-85%:SEVERE-SLOPE,T00 SANDY - 11 PATHS 125-85%:SEVERE-TOO SANDY,SLOPE
'ICNIC AREASI 11 AND I
1 11 TRAILS I
REGIONAL INTERPRETATIONS
I I
I I I
I I
CAPABILITY AND YIELDS PER ACRE OF CROPS AND PASTURE (HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT)
I CLASS- I CAPA- ICORN ISOYBEANS [PEANUTS ITOBACCO 1BAHIAGRASS (IMPROVED (OATS I
DETERMINING I BILITY I I I I I IBREMUDAGR. I [
PHASE [ I(BU) I(BU) I(LBS) I(L8S) I(AUM) I(AUM) I(8U) 1
INIRRIIRR.INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. I
I12-35%
'35-85%
4S
6S
7S
BE
55
20
12000 1 11700 1 1 7.0 1 1 7.0 1 1 20 1
1 1 1 1 1 6.5 1 1 6.5 1 I I
1 I I I 16.0 1, 1 6.0 I I I
I •I I I I I I I I I
[ I I I I I I I I I
[ I I I I I I I I I
[ I I I I I I I I I
[ I I I I I I I I I
( I I I I I I I I I
-- WOODLAND SUITABILITY
CLASS- IORDI MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS I POTENTIAL PRODUCTIVITY I I
DETERMINING ISYMIEROS'NIEQUIP.ISEEDL.IWINOTHIPLANT I COMMON TREES ISITEIPRODI TREES TO PLANT I
10-35% AFFR>40 IIOSISLIGHTIMODER.IMODER.ISLIGHTISLIGHTISLASH PINE
180
110
ILOBLOLLY PINE I
I I I I I I 1LOBLOLLY PINE
180
18
ILONGLEAF PINE I
I (LONGLEAF PINE
165
15
1 [
I I I I I I I ITURKEY-OAK
I
I
I I
I 1 I I I I [BLACKJACK OAK
I
I
I I
I I I I I 1 [POST OAK
I
I
I I
-IAFFR30-40 19S ISLIGHTIMODER.IMODER.ISLIGHTISLIGHTISLASH PINE
175
19
ISLASH PINE I
1 [ 1 I I I ILOBLOLLY PINE
175
17
ILOBLOLLY PINE I
1 1 1 1 1 ILONGLEAF PINE
160
14
ILONGLEAF PINE I
[TURKEY OAK
I
1
.1 1
I I I I I I I IBLACKJACK OAK
I
I
I I
I I I I I I IPOST OAK
I
I
I I
15-85% AFFR>40 19S IMODER.ISEVEREISEVEREISLIGHTISLIGHTISLASH PINE
175
19
1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ILAUREL OAK
I
I
I I
' I I I I I I I
I
I
I I

IKELAND SERIES
FL0001
:LASS-DETERMIN'G PHASEI SPECIES IHTI SPECIES
IHTI SPECIES
IHTI SPECIES
IHTI
>40 ISLASH PINE 145ILOBLOLLY PINE
I40ISAND PINE
I30IEASTERN REDCEDAR
I45I
ICAROLINA LAURELCHERR130IJAPANESE PRIVET
I30IBAMBOO
I25I
I I
I I I
IFFR30-40 ISLASH PINE I401LOBLOLLY PINE
I I
1351SAND PINE
I I
125JEASTERN REDCEDAR
I I
1401
ICAROLINA LAURELCHERRI25IJAPANESE PRIVET
I25IBAMBOO
I20I
I I
WILDLIFE HABITAT SUITABILITY (B)
CLASS- POTENTIAL FOR HABITAT ELEMENTS I POTENTIAL AS HABITAT FOR:
DETERMINING IGRAIN &IGRASS &I WILD IHARDWD ICONIFERISHRUBS IWETLANDISHALLOWIOPENLO IWOOOLD IWETLANDIRANGELDI
PHASE I SEED ILEGUME I HERB. I TREES (PLANTS I IPLANTS I WATER IWILDLF IWILDLF IWILDLF IWILDLF I
'1-35% (POOR IPOOR (FAIR IPOOR SPOOR I IV. POORIV. POORIPOOR POOR IV. POORI I
IJ5-85% IV. POORIV. POORIFAIR IPOOR (POOR I IV. POCRIV. POORIV. POORIPOOR IV. POORI I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
POTENTIAL NATIVE PLANT COMMUNITY (RANGELAND OR FOREST UNDERSTORY VEGETATION) (C)
I PLANT I PERCENTAGE COMPOSTION (DRY WEIGHT) BY CLASS DETERMINING PHASE I
I COMMON PLANT NAME I SYMBOL I ALL I I I I I
I (NLSPN) I d I 1 1 I
JREEPING BLUESTEM' ISCST2 I 15 I I I I
[_OPSIDED INDIANGRASS ISOSE5 I 10 I I I I
(PURPLE BLUESTEM IANVIG I 5 I I I I
IROOMSEDGE BLUESTEM IANVI2 I 5 I I I I
'INEYWOODS DROPSEED ISPJU I 5 I I I
IPTNELAND THREEAWN IARST5 I 5
:R PERENNIAL GRASSLIKES IPPGL I 5
)RASSLEAF GOLDASTER IHEOL I 10 I I I
IUTHER ANNUAL FORBS IAAFF I 5 I I I I
[SAW PALMETTO ISERE2 I 5 I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I POTENTIAL PRODUCTION (LBS./AC. DRY WT): I I
FAVORABLE YEARS I 4000 I I I 1 I
NORMAL YEARS _ I 3300 I I I I
UNFAVORABLE YEARS 1 2500 1 I I I I
FOOTNOTES
RATINGS BASED ON NSH GUIDE SHEETS 3/31/78.
WILDLIFE RATINGS BASED ON SOILS MEMORANDUM-74, JAN. 1972.
C LONGLEAF PINE -TURKEY OAK HILLS RANGE SITE.
IF WATER SUPPLIES, STREAMS, ETC. RECEIVE SEEPAGE FROM ABSORPTION FIELD A CONTAMINATION HAZARD MAY EXIST BECAUSE OF P
TOO STEEP FOR PLANTED PINES.
**'THIS IS A RATING OVERRIDE. SEE THE INTERPRETATION OVERRIDE FILE FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THIS OVERRIDE.

4

LOCATION LYNCHBURG SC+AL FL GA NC VA
Established Series
Rev. RLV-DJD
3/93
LYNCHBURG SERIES
1 r
~ The Lynchburg series consists of very deep, somewhat poorly drained
soils that formed in loamy marine sediments. Slopes are less than 2
percent.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Fine -loamy, siliceous, thermic Aeric Paleaquults
TYPICAL PEDON: Lynchburg loamy finesand--cultivated. (Colors are for
moist soil.)
Ap--O to 6 inches; very dark gray.(10YR 3/,1) loamy fine sand; weak
medium granular structure; very friable; common fine roots, few medium
roots; very strongly acid; clear smooth boundary. (3 to 9 inches thick)
-E--6 to 10 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) loamy fine sand; common
i medium distinct dark gray (10YR 4/1) mottles; weak medium subangular
blocky structure; very friable; common fine roots; few fine pores; very
strongly acid; clear smooth oundary. (0 to l0 inches 'thick)
Bt--10 to 17 inches;'yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) sandy clay loam;
common medium distinct light brownish gray (10YR 6/2) and few fine
medium prominent red (10R 4/8) mottles; weak medium subangular blocky
structure; friable; common fine roots; few fine pores; few faint clay
films on faces of some peds; very strongly acid; clear wavy boundary.
`4V Btg--17 to 62 inches; gray (10YR 6/1) sandy clay loam; many medium
prominent yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) and common medium prominent red
(2.5YR 4/6) mottles; weak ,medium subangular blocky structure; friable;
few fine roots; few fine pores; common faint clay films on faces of some
;yr peds; very strongly acid. (Combined thickness of'the Bt horizons are
more than 40 inches.)
1l TYPE LOCATION: Colleton County, South Carolina, 3,000 feet southeast of
LL junction of U.S. Highway 21 and Seaboard Coastline Railroad in Ruffin; 4
southwest of junction of U.S. Highway 21 and South Carolina Secondary
Road 272; 100 feet north of U.S. Highway 21.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: The particle -size control section contains
less than 30 percent silt. Solum thickness is more than 60 inches. The
soil is extremely acid to strongly acid throughout the profile, unless
limed. Content of coarse fragments range from 0 to 7 percent in
individual subhorizons.
The A or Ap horizon has hue of 10YR, 2:5Y or neutral, value of 2 to 4,
and chroma of 0 to 2. It is loamy sand, loamy fine sand,,sandy loam,
fine sandy loam or loam.
e The E horizon, where present, has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 4 to 7,

(� PAGE 02
and chroma of 1 to 4. Mottles in shades of brown, yellow, or gray are
in some pedons. The E horizon is loamy sand, loamy fine sand, sandy
loam, fine sandy loam or loam:
The Bt horizon has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value.of 5 or '6, and chroma of 3
to 8, with few to many mottles of chroma 2 or less. In'some pedons, it
is mottled in shades of red, brown, or yellow. The Bt horizon commonly
is sandy clay loam, but ranges to'sandy loam, fine sandy loam, loam or
- clay loam.
The Btg horizon has hue of 10YR to 5Y or neutral, value of 4 to 7, and
chroma of 0 to 2. It has common to many mottles -of higher chroma, and
few to -common mottles of redder hue. The Btg horizon commonly is sandy
clay loam, but ranges to sandy loam, fine sandy loam, loam or clay loam.
Some pedons are sandy clay or clay at depths of 40 inches or more.
J
The BC horizon, where present, has hue of 10YR to 5Y, value 4 to 7, and
chroma of 1 or 2. It is sandy loam, fine sandy loam, sandy clay loam,
loam, clay loam, sandy clay or clay.
COMPETING SERIES: These are the Hazlehurst and Jedburg series in the
same family, and the Abell, Altavista, Augusta, Aynor, Bettie, Eunola,
Goldsboro, Lumbee, Ogeechee, Summerfield, Tetotum, Yauhannah, and
I Yemassee series in similar families. Hazlehurst soils have a firm,
brittle Bx horizon with more than 5 percent plinthite. Jedburg soils
contains more than 30 percent silt in the particle -size control section.
Abell, Altavista, Augusta, Bertie; Summerfield, and Tetotum soils have
mixed mineralogy. Eunola, Goldsboro and Yauhannah soils are better ,
drained and have a matrix of higher chroma in the control section.
Lumbee, Ogeechee, and Rains soils are gray in 60 percent or more of the
i matrix between the A or Ap horizon and a depth of 30 inches. In
addition, Lumbee soils also have contrasting textures within a depth of
40 inches. Yemassee soils have a clay decrease of more than 20 percent
�r
of the maximum within a depth of 60 inches.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING Lynchburg soils are on low areas of the Coastal
( Plain, generally in shallow depressions or on broad interstream divides.
it Slope are less than 2 percent. Lynchburg soils formed in thick marine
sediments of loamy texture. The mean annual temperature ranges. from 59
to 66 degrees F.; mean annual precipitation ranges from 38 to 50 inches,
I and the frost free season ranges from 190 to 240 days.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: These are the competing Eunola,
Goldsboro, Rains series and'the Clarendon, Coxville, Dunbar, Duplin,
Foreston, Grady, Johns, Ocilla, Pelham, Stallings, and Woodington
series. Clarendon, Duplin, and Foreston soils do not have gray colors
in the upper part of the argillic horizon. Coxville, Dunbar, Duplin,
and Grady soils have a clayey particle -size control section. In
addition, Coxville, Grady, and Pelham soils have dominant chroma of 2 or
less throughout. Foreston, Stallings, and Woodington soils have a
coarse -loamy particle -size control section. Ocilla and Pelham soils have
a sandy epipedon.20 to 40 inches thick. Johns soils have contrasting
textures within a depth of 40 inches.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Somewhat poorly drained. Runoff is slow.
Permeability is moderate. Some concave depressions may have shallow
water standing on.the surface during,or shortly after heavy rains.
i�

PAGE 03
USE AND VEGETATION: About one-half of the soil is in cropland or
pasture and the remainder is in forest. Principal crops are corn,
soybeans, cotton, tobacco, truck crops, small grain, or improved
pasture. Native vegetation is oak, sweetgum, blackgum, longleaf pine,
slash pine, loblolly pine, and an understory of gallberry and pineland
threeawn.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Georgia, Alabama, Florida, North Carolina,
y South Carolina, and Virginia. The series is of large extent.
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Tift County, Georgia; 1947.
REMARKS:
Diagnostic horizons and features recognized'in this pedon are:
Ochric epipedon - the zone from the surface of the soil to a depth of 10
inches (Ap and E horizons).
- Argillic horizon - the zone from 10 to 62 inches (Bt and Btg horizons).
National Cooperative Soil Survey
U.S.A.
i;
i
v

D037 S 0 1 L I NT E R P R E TAT I0NS RECORD LYNCHBURG SERIES
RA(S): 133A, 137, 153A
RLV, 7-92
i1LALC PALEAQUULTS, FINE -LOAMY, SILICEOUS, THERMIC
'RY DEEP, MODERATELY PERMEABLE SOILS OF THE COASTAL PLAIN. IN REPRESENTATIVE PROFILE THE SURFACE LAYER IS VERY DARK
„SAY LOAMY FINE SAND. THE SUBSURFACE HORIZON IS YELLOWISH BROWN LOAMY FINE SAND. THE UPPER SUBSOIL IS YELLOWISH BROWN
SANDY CLAY LOAM WITH GRAY MOTTLES. THE LOWER SUBSOIL IS GRAY SANDY CLAY LOAM WITH BROWN AND RED MOTTLES.
AND
ANNUAL AIR I FROST FREE I ANNUAL I ELEVATION I DRAINAGE I SLOPE
TEMPERATURE I DAYS I PRECIPITATION I (FT) I CLASS I fPCT)
`EPTHI
I
,I
IFRACT.IFRACT_IPERCENT.OF
MATERIAL LESS
ICLAY I
IN.)I USDA TEXTURE
I UNIFIED
I AASHTO
I>10 INI3-IOINI THAN 3" PASSING SIEVE NO.I
I
1
1
1
I(PCT)
I(PCT) 1 4 1 10 I 40 1 200
I(PCT)I
10-10 ILS,LFS
ISM,SP-SM
IA-2,A-4
I 0
I 0 I92-100 90-100 60-100 12-40
I2-10 I
-10 ISL,FSL,L
ISM,ML,SC-SM,CL-ML
IA-2,A-4
I 0
I 0 I92-100 90-100 75-100 25-55
I5-20 I
0-62ISCL,SL,CL
I I
I
ISC-SM,SC,CL,CL-ML
I
I
IA-2,A-4,A-6
I
I
I 0
I
I
I 0- I92-100 90-100 70-100 25-67
I I
I I
I18-35I
I I
I I
I.EPTHILIQUID
IPLAS- I
MOIST BULK I
-PERMEA- I
AVAILABLE I SOIL I SALINITY I.
SAR I CEC I CAC03 I GYPSUM I
lfIN.)I LIMIT
ITICITY1
DENSITY I
BILITY IWATER CAPACITYI REACTION I I
I I I I
I
(INDEX I
(G/CM3) I
(IN/HR) I
(IN/IN) I (PH) I(MMHOS/CM)l
I(ME/100G)I (PCT) I (PCT) I
_'_-IO 115-25
NP-4 I
1.40-1.70 I
6.0-20 I .0.07-0.10
13.6-6.0 I I
I 1-4 II I
In 10 115-30
I NP-7 I
1.30-1.60 I
2.0-6.0 I
0.09-0.13 13.6-5.5 I I
I 2-6 I' I I
•2I 15-40
14-18 I
1.30-1.50 I
0.6-2.0 I
0.12-0.16 13.6-5:5 I I
I 2-1
I I I I
I
I
I I I
I I 6 I
I �EPTHIORGANICI SHRINK-
I EROSION
IWIND I WINO
I CORROSIVITY I
�.,'IN.)IMATTER
I SWELL
I FACTORS
IEROD.I EROD.
I I
I I (PCT)
(POTENTIAL( K I KfI T
IGROUPI INDEX
I STEEL ICONCRETEI
r--
10 I .5-5
I LOW
1.151.151 5
I 2 I 134
I HIGH I 'HIGH I
-
_ 2_10 I .5-5
I LOW
1.201.201 5
I 3 I 86
I.
I10-62I 0-.5
I
.I LOW
I
1.201.201
I I I
..
I I I
�- FLOODING I HIGH WATER TABLE I CEMENTED PAN I BEDROCK 1SUBSIDENCE IHYDIPOTENT'LI
I.DEPTH I KIND IMONTHS IOEP.THIHARDNESSIDEPTH IHARDNESSIINIT.ITOTALIGRPI FROST I
�. FREQUENCY I DURATION IMONTHS,I (FT) 1 1 1 (IN)I I (IN) I I(IN) I(IN) I I ACTION I
I NONE 1 1 I0.5-1.5IAPPARENTINOV-APRI 1 >60 I I_ I I_C_I_ _I
i-f -.

ICHBURG SERIES
SCO037
SANITARY FACILITIES (B) CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL (B)
ISEVERE-WETNESS II (POOR -WETNESS I
_ "IC TANK I II I I
,..SORPTION I II ROADFILL I I
FIELDS] II I I
I' ISEVERE-WETNESS
I SEWAGE I
LAGOON I
_ AREAS I
]SEVERE -WETNESS
SANITARY I
LANDFILL I
(TRENCH) I
SAND
II ]IMPROBABLE -EXCESS
II I
II GRAVEL I
II ]
ISEVERE-WETNESS II ]POOR -WETNESS
I SANITARY I II ]
LANDFILL I �]. TOPSOIL I
(AREA) I II I
FINES
(POOR -WETNESS
II
DAILY
I
I1.
WATER MANAGEMENT (3)
[-COVER FOR
I
II
IMOOERATE-SEEPAGE _ I
�- LANDFILL
I'
11 POND
.I I
]
11 RESERVOIR
I I
11 AREA
I F
BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT (B)
II
I I
ISEVERE-WETNESS
11
ISEVERE-PIPING,WETNESS I
'SHALLOW
I
11EMBANKMENTS
I I
]EXCAVATIONS
I
II DIKES AND
I I
I
]] 'LEVEES
I I
lei
IJ
f
II
I I
ISEVERE-WETNESS
11
IMODERATE-SLOW REFILL ]
!_SWELLINGS
EXCAVATED
I I
WITHOUT
I
].I PONDS
I ]
._,IASEMENTS
I
IIAQUIFER FED
I
I
I
II
I I
ISEVERE-WETNESS
II
IFAVORABLE I
IWELLINGS
I
II
I I
I WITH
I
]] DRAINAGE
I I
'- 9ASEMENTS
I
] ]
I I
i ISEVERE-WETNESS
I SMALL I
! �DMMERCIAL I
t_Y)UILDINGS
I
ISEVERE-WETNESS
LOCAL I
( ROADS AND I
,STREETS I
-% AWNS, ISEVERE-WETNESS
!_ .JSCAPING I
AND GOLF I
FAIRWAYS I
II ISL,FSL,L:WETNESS,SOIL BLOWING
II ILS,LFS:WETNESS,FAST INTAKE,SOIL BLOWING
]] IRRIGATION I
II I
IWETNESS,SOIL BLOWING
TERRACES I
AND I
DIVERSIONS I
II IWETNESS
II GRASSED I
I� WATERWAYS I
II I

iNCHBURG SERIES I SCO037
RECREATIONAL bEVELOPMENT (B)
.]SEVERE -WETNESS I] ISEVERE-WETNESS I.
I II I I
I � MP AREAS I ]]PLAYGROUNDS I ]
j I II I I
ISEVERE-WETNESS ISEVERE-WETNESS I
( I II PATHS I I
1CNIC AREASI AND I - I
TRAILS
I I II I I
REGIONAL INTERPRETATIONS
I I
I I I
I I
I I
CAPABILITY AND YIELDS PER ACRE OF CROPS AND PASTURE (HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT)
I CLASS- I CAPA- ]CORN ICOTTON ]TOBACCO ISOYBEANS (OATS IBAHIAGRASS ITALL I
DETERMINING I BILITY I ILINT I I I I IFESCUE I
PHASE I I(BU) I(LBS) I(LBS) I(BU) I(BU) I(AUM) I(AUM) I
I INIRRIIRR.INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR'. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. I
LL 12W 1 1 115 I 1675 1 12800
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
WOODLAND SUITABILITY
45
75
110.0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10.0
J, CLASS- IORDI MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS I POTENTIAL PRODUCTIVITY I I
DETERMINING ISYMIEROS'NIEOUIP.]SEEDL.IWINOTHIPLANT I "COMMON TREES ISITEIPRODI TREES TO PLANT I
PHASE I IHAZAROILIMIT IMORT'YIHAZARDICOMPETI IINOXICLASI I
JALL 19W ISLIGHTIMODER.ISLIGHTISLIGHTISEVEREILOBLOLLY PINE 186 19 ILOBLOLLY PINE I
] I I I I ILONGLEAF PINE 174 16 IAMERICAN SYCAMORE I
I (YELLOW -POPLAR I92 16 ISWEETGUM I
I I I I I I ISWEETGUM 190 17 1 1
1 I ISOUTHERN RED OAK 'I I I
I I 1 1 I I (WHITE OAK I I I ]
I I BLACKGUM I I I I
L I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I

NCHBURG SERIES SCO037
WINDBREAKS
LASS-DETERMIN'G PHASEI SPECIES IHTI SPECIES IHTI SPECIES IHTI SPECIES _IHTI
NONE I I I I I I I I
I II II II II
I II II II II
I II II II _ II
I � II II II II
CLASS- I POTENTIAL FOR HABITAT ELEMENTS I POTENTIAL AS HABITAT FOR: I
I DETERMINING
16RAIN
&IGRASS &I WILD
IHARDWD ICONIFERISHRUBS
IWETLANDISHALLOWIOPENLD
IWOODLD
]WETLANDIRANGELDI
PHASE
I SEED
(LEGUME I HERB.
I TREES (PLANTS I
(PLANTS I WATER IWILDLF
IWILDLF
IWILDLF IWILDLF I
LL
IFAIR
I
IGOOD 16000
I ]
16000 IGOOD I
I I I
IFAIR IFAIR IGOOD
I ] I
(GOOD
I
]FAIR I I
I I I
r
I
I
I ] I I I I ] I I
I I I I I I ] I I
I I I
I I I
POTENTIAL
NATIVE PLANT COMMUNITY (RANGELAND OR FOREST UNDERSTORY VEGETATION)
_
I PLANT I
PERCENTAGE COMPOSTION (DRY WEIGHT) BY CLASS
DETERMINING PHASE 'I
COMMON PLANT NAME
I SYMBOL I
ALL I
I I
I I
I (NLSPN) I
I
I I
I I
ITTLE BLUESTEM
ISCSC 1
10 1
1 1
I 1
IPANICUM
IPANIC 1
5 1
1 1
] 1
'-OMMON CARPETGRASS
IAXAF 1
15 1
1 1
1 1
7NGLEAF UNIOLA
'ICHSE2 1
20 1
1 I
1 1
pdITCHCANE
IARTE4* 1
10 1
1 I
I 1
19MITHERN BAYBERRY
IMYCE 1
5 I
I I
I 1
!OWNS
IUUUU 1
10 1
1 I
I 1
IRGE GALLBERRY
IILCO 1
10 1
1 1
I 1
IPINELAND THREEAWN
IARST5 1
10 1
I I
I I
`fJ
I I
I I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
i i
I I
I
I I
I I
POTENTIAL PRODUCTION (LBS./AC. DRY WT): I
1 FAVORABLE YEARS ] 2350
NORMAL YEARS ] 1950
FOOTNOTES
ESTIMATES OF ENGINEERING PROPERTIES BASED ON TEST DATA FROM 2 PEDONS FROM S.C. AND FLA.
'c' RATINGS BASED ON NATIONAL SOILS HANDBOOK, PART 603, JULY 1983.
C WOODLAND RATINGS BASED ON NFM, SEPT 1980.

MCCOLL

Official Series Description - MCCOLL Series Page 1 of 3
-- LOCATION MCCOLL SC+NC
Established Series
DJD-MLN/Rev. JAK
8/98
MCCOLL SERIES
The McColl series consists of poorly drained, slowly permeable soils that are shallow or moderately
deep to a fragipan and very deep to bedrock. They formed in loamy sediments in oval depressions on
the Coastal Plain. The soils are nearly level or concave. Runoff is ponded. Slopes are less than 2
percent.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Fine, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Fragiaquults
TYPICAL PEDON: McColl loam, cultivated. (Colors are for moist soil.)
Ap--O to 6 inches; very dark gray (10YR 3/1) loam; weak fine granular structure; very friable; many
fine roots; medium acid; abrupt wavy boundary. (4 to 8 inches thick)
Btgl--6 to 9 inches; dark grayish brown (IOYR 4/2) sandy clay loam; weak fine subangular blocky
structure; friable; common fine roots; strong brown stains lining old root channels; few fine pores;
strongly acid; clear smooth boundary.
Btg2--9 to 13 inches; light brownish gray (2.5Y 6/2) clay; weak fine subangular blocky structure;
firm; sticky; common fine roots; strong brown stains lining old root channels; common fine pores;
few distinct clay films; very strongly acid; clear irregular boundary. (Combined thickness of the Btg
horizon is 8 to 28 inches)
i BtgBx--13 to 23 inches; 60 percent light brownish gray (2.5Y 6/2) clay; weak medium subangular
blocky structure; firm, sticky; common fine roots; common fine pores; few distinct clay films (Btg
part); 40 percent strong brown (7.5YR 5/6) sandy clay loam; strong coarse prismatic structure which
J is about 1 inch in diameter at the top and about 3 inches at the bottom; prisms part horizontally to
coarse platy structure; firm; brittle; common fine and medium pores with the larger pores coated or
filled with gray clay (Bx part); few medium prominent red (2.5YR 4/8) iron accumulations;
boundary between gray clay and strong brown sandy clay loam is sharp; strongly acid; clear irregular
boundary. (0 to 15 inches thick)
Btx--23 to 42 inches; strong brown (7.5YR 5/6) sandy clay loam; moderate coarse prismatic
structure parting to strong coarse platy; firm; brittle; many fine and medium pores, some of which
are coated or filled with gray clay; common medium prominent red (2.5YR 4/8) iron accumulations;
about 20 percent of this horizon is vertical streaks of light gray (IOYR 7/1) clay; weak medium
subangular blocky structure; firm; moderately sticky, slightly plastic; common fine roots in upper
part and few fine roots in lower part; very strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary. (Combined
thickness of the Btx horizon is 15 to 32 inches.)
BC1--42 to 63 inches; strong brown (7.5YR 5/6) sandy clay loam; weak medium subangular blocky
structure; friable, firm in place; moderately sticky, slightly plastic; common medium prominent pale
brown (IOYR 6/3) iron depletions, common fine prominent red (2.5YR 4/6) iron accumulations, and
many medium and coarse prominent light gray (IOYR 7/1) iron depletions that are massive clay;
strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary. (15 to 30 inches thick)
BC2--63 to 75 inches; strong brown (7.5YR 5/6) sandy loam; massive; friable; common medium
prominent pale brown (IOYR 6/3) iron depletions, red (2.5YR 4/6) iron accumulations, and many
http://www.statiab.iastate.edu/soils/osd/dat/NMICCOLL.htmi 10/16/98

Official Series Description - MCCOLL Series
Page 2of3
medium and coarse prominent light gray (I OYR 7/1) iron depletions that are sandy clay loam;
strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary. (Combined thickness of the BC horizon is 15 to 35 inches.)
Cg--75 to 80 inches; light gray (I OYR 7/1) sandy loam; massive; very friable; many coarse
prominent yellow (I OYR 7/6) iron accumulations; strongly acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Sumter County, South Carolina; from SC Highway 120, 2.0 miles west on
County Road 33; site is 700 feet northwest of road, 50 feet north of fence, and 50 feet southwest of
drainage ditch.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Solum thickness is 60 to 72 inches or more. Depth to fragic
soil properties is 12 to 36 inches. Depth to a fragipan is 15 to 40 inches. The soil is extremely acid to
moderately acid throughout, except in limed areas. Nodules of plinthite totaling less than 5 percent
by volume are in some pedons. Some pedons have few to common concretions of ironstone.
The Ap or A horizon has hue of 1 OYR, value of 2 to 4, and chroma of 1 or 2. It is loam, sandy loam,
fine sandy loam, sandy clay loam, or clay loam.
The Eg horizon, where present, has hue of 1 OYR, value of 6 or 7, and chroma of 1 or 2. It is sandy
loam, fine sandy loam, or loam.
The Btg or B'tg horizon has hue of 1 OYR or 2.5Y, value of 4 to 7, and chroma of 1 or 2 or it is
neutral with vale of 4 to 7. Many pedons have masses of iron accumulation in shades of red, yellow,
or brown. It is sandy clay loam in the upper part, or it is clay loam, sandy clay, or clay. The lower
boundary of most pedons is clear irregular or abrupt irregular with tongues of the Bt horizon that
taper with depth and extend into the Btx horizon.
The Btx horizon has hue of 7.5YR or 1 OYR, value of 5 or 6, and chroma of 4 to 8. Red masses of
iron accumulation, or gray iron depletions are in most pedons. This horizon has moderate to strong
coarse prismatic structure parting to platy or blocky. It is sandy clay loam, clay loam, or sandy clay.
- The BC horizon has hue of 7.5YR or IOYR, value of 5 or 6, and chroma of 4 to S. Red masses of
iron accumulation, or gray iron depletions are in most pedons. It is sandy clay loam, or sandy loam.
Most pedons have pockets of gray coarser or finer textures.
The BCg horizon has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 4 to 7, and chroma of 1 or 2 or it is neutral with
L vale of 4 to 7. It is sandy clay loam, or sandy loam. Most pedons have pockets of gray coarser or
finer textures.
i i The Cg.horizon of most pedons has hue of IOYR or 2.5Y, value of 5 to 7, and chroma of 1 or 2, or is
neutral with value of 4 to 8. Most pedons have many masses of iron accumulation in shades of
brown, yellow, or red. Some pedons are a combination of iron accumulations and depletions in
shades of gray, yellow, brown, or red. It is sandy loam, sandy clay loam, or sandy clay. Some pedons
have pockets of coarser or finer textures.
COMPETING SERIES: There are no other known series in this family. Similar series in other
families are Argent, Coxville, Gourdin, Rains, Ogeechee, Rembert, Wadmalaw, Williman, and
Yemassee. None of these soils except Gourdin exhibits episaturation. Gourdin soils are fine -loamy.
In addition, Argent soils have mixed clay mineralogy. Coxville and Rains soils do not have a 20
percent clay decrease within 60 inches of the surface. Wadmalaw soils have an umbric epipedon.
Williman soils have an arenic epipedon. Ogeechee and Yemassee soils are fine -loamy.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: McColl soils are on nearly level, concave, oval -shaped depressions
with no natural drainage outlets. They formed in loamy marine sediments. Near the type location,
mean annual rainfall is 47 inches, and mean annual temperature is 64 degrees F.
http://www.statlab.iastate.edu/soils/osd/dat/M/1VICCOLL.htmi 10/16/98

Official Series Description - MCCOLL Series
Page 3 of 3
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: In addition to the similar Coxville, Rains, and
Rembert soils, these are the Byars, Dunbar, Duplin, Goldsboro, Lynchburg, Noboco, Norfolk,
Pantego, and Plummer soils. Byars, Pantego, and Plummer soils do not exhibit episaturation. The
remaining soils, except the similar soils, are better drained.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Poorly drained. Surface runoff is very slow or is ponded.
Permeability is slow. In undrained areas, the high water table is near or above the surface for as
much as 6 months per year.
USE AND VEGETATION: Drained areas are used for growing corn, soybeans, hay, and pasture.
Native vegetation is pond pine, blackgum, and baldcypress, with an understory of gallberry, alder,
and sedge.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: North Carolina and South Carolina. The series is of minor
extent.
MLRA OFFICE RESPONSIBLE: Raleigh, North Carolina
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Marlboro County, South Carolina; 1963.
— REMARKS: Diagnostic horizons and other diagnostic soil characteristics recognized in this pedon
are:
Ochric epipedon--the zone from the surface of the soil to a depth of 6 inches (Ap horizon)
Argillic horizon --the zone between a depth of 6 and 42 inches (Bgl, Btg2, Btg(Bx, and Btx horizons)
Fragic soil properties --the zone between a depth of 13 and 42 inches (Btg/Bx and Btx horizons)
Fragipan horizon --the zone between a depth of 23 and 42 inches (Btx horizon)
Aquic conditions --the zone from 6 inches to a depth of 23 inches is periodically saturated (Btgl,
Btg2, and BtgBx horizons)
MLRA(s): 133A, 137, 153A
SERIES INTERPRETATION RECORD(S): SC0011
OSD-SIR REPORT:
SOI-5 Soil Name Slope Airtemp FrFr/Seas Precip Elevation
SCO011 MCCOLL 0- 2 62- 66 220-240 42- 48 75- 220
SOI-5 F1oodl, F1oodH Watertable Kind Months Bedrock Hardness
- SCO011 NONE +1.0-1.0 PERCHED - >60
SOI-5 Depth Texture 3-Inch No-10 Clay% -CEC-
SC0011 0- 9 SL FSL 0- 0 95-100 8-18 1- 4
! SC0011 0- 9 SCL CL L 0- 0 95-100 15-35 2- 6
SCO011 9-13 CL SC C 0- 0 95-100 35-60 3- 8
SCO011 13-42 SCL CL SC 0- 0 95-100 25-45 2- 6
( _I SC0011 42-80 SCL SL SC 0- 0 95-100 15-40 1- 6
!_
SOI-5 Depth -pH- O.M. Salin Permeab Shnk-Swll
SCO011 0- 9 4.5- 7.3 L-8. 0- 0 0.6- 2.0 LOW
SC0011 0- 9 4.5- 7.3 L-8. 0- 0 0.6- 2.0 LOW
— SCOO 11 9-13 4.5- 5.5 0.-.5 0- 0 0.2- 0.6 LOW
SC0011 13-42 4.5- 5.5 0.-.5 0- 0 0.06- 0.2 LOW
SCO011 42-80 4.5-5.5 0.-.5 0- 0 0.2- 2.0 LOW
National Cooperative Soil Survey
U.S.A.
http://www.statlab.iastate.edu/soils/osd/dat/NI/MCCOLL.html 10/16/98

SCO^21 5 .. _ k. R a;= A7 ...ti a R 2 O R D MCCG' _ S2Ri_
,L7WS); '32A, c3A,
°?TC a*Ar TA.t a_-S, SAY=!, A :i`i: ,, I'r
?,y" 1 AP.- '!o D , s 1-:Y �ca.Y�AS� . E S.AS-.;- ?'�i.:..S. TYPICA"Y ==SE _._S -AVE VERY DA-K E^W _Nm:Y
?FACE LPSE A.'D FAY7S—:.AY ! UPa2? a .... 5, arq 3?7RASPAN AYES. -2cc ,..,..5 A-c lk '. ARLY _c!=_, °CAVE,
IAL SHAPED DE''Y2,.,,.::>, .. - . °AT„-.4:_ ._:.c"_.
-
AiiDSCA?= Ain r :YA-"T_c
ANNUAL AIR
F3 ST c 2c ANNUAL c. lATi' C
DRAINAGE
SLG E
— T �.=A
^ T
DAYS ErA
Cw
(arT)S
62-6a
�ICTI
4?_yc
0_2
ccrbATa SOT: ncna_x-= (A)
;=RAC;.:=RACT.!F
C2NT OF MATv IAL
LESS TLAY .
TIN. It MA -Rn�=l AAS- „ ;?10 k..SiN6 c c ST.
. ,..:JE T.
:(PC-..)
1(PCT)
I 4 1 10 40
200 1fPCT'
�0-9 'SL,FSL
:SC,SC-SM ;A-2 0
1 0
:100 95-100 60-90
20-35 '3-iS
0-9 15CL ^
:SC L r. :A a A ' 0
I 0
:100 95-100 75-90
45-6911S F1
1CL,SC,C
;SC,CL !A-4,A-6,A-7 0
0
:10 95-100 30-93
36-75 ;E-601
13-4Z1SCL,a-,S C
SC, EC-SM,CL,L-ML IA-Z,A-4,A-13 1 0
0
110<) 95-100 65-90
` 60 125-451
-142-30!Ew,5L,SC
;SMISc, SC-5~ ;A-2,A-4,A-6,A-7 0
0
00 95-100 60-30
30-.9 115-401
^or_1: T D !PUS_ 1
]r �„ �.QU'i .A
w Ic- B � P_RX a r 'L S
.) . ,,i:�( _ =A- AVA�LA..L� � SO: SALINITY
SAR CEC CAC03 1 1
SYPSE^:
IN.): LIMIT 'TICITY;
D2N5ITY R!LITV :rATER CAPAC17Y1 -REACTION
1
1
1I!IM
(G/!^r-) ( I (TMITN) (PH) 1(I",HOS/CM):
(MV11.10G): WC-) (PM
.0-9 115-30 . 4-12 ;
1.30-1.60 0.6 2.0 0.10-0.116 1 4.5-7.3 1
1
1 1-4 1
1 1
0-9 1 20-40 ; 5-20 '
..20-1.50 0.6-2.0 0,12-0.16 1 4.5-7.3 1
1
1 2-6 1
1 1
1 25-50 : 3-23 :
1.30-1.50 ; 0.2-0.6 0.13-0.17 1 4.5-5.5 1
1 3-3 I
1
"' 41'1 20-40 •. 15 1
1.75-1.95 1 0.06-0.2 1 0.07-0.11 1 4.5-5.5 i
1
1 2-6 1
1 1
f
1 15-52 ; 3-.
1.50-1.70 0.2-2.0 0.03-0.12 f 4.5-5.5
;
1 1-6 1
1 1
1DE?T116RGANICI S:-RI.W-
1 EROSION ;WIND .WIND C)PSCSIViTY 1
fIN.MIATTER I SWELL
1 FACM-ra 1 ROD.; ROD. ! 1
t (PCT.) 1POT24TTAL1
< 1 <E1 T 1GROUP! INDE(: S c :M.,c 2'
1 0-9 : 1-3 LN
%241.241 5! 3 1 86 HI&' HIGH
" 0-9 1 1-3 LON
1.241.241 5 1 5 56 1
i-13 ; 0-.5 LOW
1.241.241 1 I )
0-.5 ; LO'W
;.2a1.241
-.-4Z-301 0-.5 LOW
;.321.32;
_. FLCODIN'S
= H WATER TAKE CEMENTED PAN ; BEDROCK :SUBSIDENCE
1HYDIPOTENT'L;
_
1 DEFTF, KIND ; NE—iS B_= =„HARD=_.S*F ::I
;HARDh551INIT,.TOTALIGT6'1 =HOST 1
'i F.".c-0,0 MRA7iC:7
;dIO=1S . ff?: (i?)
1 (IN)
1(?N) 1(IN)
1 ACTMy
^LONE
» - .O:A°PARD;T:=V-:?R;
>60
D '

MCM-1 Ga Es s.aei:
SAN'i-ARY=AC1777ES
_
:SEVERE PONDINE,? RCS alOu LY
::
:?CDR "MESS
!SEPTIC TAK4
AES 3P?iN
.
ROADF,-,.
;
"=•RUA3LE- EXCESS =iNES
SctiAEE
�:
!
LAEOC'N
::
SAND
;
AREAS
:
EV RE ?aNDI $
:;
:IMPRBAEL tC SS FINES
; SAu:-ARY
:I
: JEE-PONDING
:POD.R-AREA CLAYEY
;
SA%i-ARY
LANDFILL
;
I;
?OPSOIL
-- (AREA)
_
:FOC'R-PONDIk6
DAILY
::
WATER MANAEEXENT (B)
COVER Fri
HE AEE
LA,NDFiLL
;
;;
POND
;
"
RESBVJIR
;
AREA
BUiL DIN6 SI?E DEVEO?MENT IB)
';
:SFJERE,?E4DIN6
;;
:SE'JER"E-PIPING,PONDIA'6
;
' °'44LLOW
1
I eMBANKMENTS
;
i �E ATIONS
;
;;
DIKES AND
;
„
LEVEES
;SEVE.RE-PDNDING
I;
;S=VEE-SLOW REFILL
DWELLINGS
I
I:
EXCAVATED
;
PONDS
-' BASEMENTE
'
i
; ! AQUi -R FED
,:
—,
!SEVERE-PONDING
:
PONDIE 'FRCS SLD'wLY
;
DWELLINGS
;
— WITH
;
;;
DRAINAC:
;
;
BAKMIE":TS
r '!
ISEVERE-IMMN6
,a.L �CNDi E,iRL E Y
:
I Slh
�L,FSL ?ONDiNG,D C G'T , OIL ELO�i4G
:
CDMMSCiAL
;
I!
IRRIGATION
BU LDI":
if
:S dERE PONDIN6
:;
:Sr: L'NDI%z :r3ii E D ?T-
:
LOCAL
TERRACES
IS�,=CL:?.I;UDIVE,Rv?.. G D-t i=,SJIL SLOWINIG
I
ROANS AND
:!
A%D
S-RE=S
DIVERSi `:S
— LAiNS,
'SEYERE-PL'NDiNG
..
^: `E=S�DR:...-�•,?i; -:?aE Do?,..
LAyDSCAr'I S
'
ERASSS
9 GL=
:u 7SWAYS

MC .. SERIES SC00ii
?=rR Ai i 4AL Dnr: rcr=vc rnt
IN
CA; AREAS ;PLAYSRG NDS
!SE'lERE-'ONDir:E .. 'SEYER� aO"'DiNE
?ATHS
;PICNIC AREAS' AND
'RAILS
REGIONAL n-ERPRETATiONS
!
!
CAP.ABiLiTY AND
YIELDS
PER ACRE
C= CRGS AND
PAFURE
IHIEH Lc�Y ^AtiAEE E'3T7
CLASS-
CAPA-
;CORN
;smmcANS
!OATS
)TALL
I
DET6RMINiN6
9I1 i?Y
;
;
!=ES",.tit-
!
Vr
q�Oq, xa
RR 'IRR.
'NiPa
T3O
!NiRR
!I??
!NTR,R TRR.
'NT?R
:PR
;NTRR
;IR?
:Ni?R
"RR.
-,JRAINED
3W ;
! 90
35
!
! 'S
!
?
!
;
I
LNrrt! ern BRTA'J!! !N (r1
CLASS-
iORD: MANAEPENT PRO°LLE�S ! POT?) T.AL POODUC
IYITY
1 DET ^,MINFNS
!SYM! Rw'N!c,l3iP.!5E DL.:iiINDTi'.?LAN? ; MMAMJ:tl TREES
!Siit:PRDD7 TREES TO PLA.'!i
' PHASE
!HA7.ARD:LiMIT !MART'YI-AZARD! D^PET!
;iNDX;CLAS7 ;
'RAINED
19W!SLTE!TIMODER.!NC9ER.:SEUE3E:SEYERE LOBLDLLY PINE
;87 19 !LOBE LLY PINE i
I ! ! (POND PINE
:70 !SWEETSv;M
i ! i ! I
!AMERICAN SYCAMORE i
?lDRAI' D
)Sari :SLIGSHT!SEVERE!S=_V=_.S_=YE,E'QwdEiE:Sz_E'N
:92 !9 13ALUCYPRESS
i 7 !BALDCYPRESS
!WATER TU?ELO ;
7
! ! 1WATER T';P 0
1

a!rrn: SE.R'. S
scoots
CAC �,cPwrmP o At! c?c^-__ ;4T: SPECH
Y
SP❑r-co !yT;
. NONE
'..;
' :
*iLDL:-AEITAT SOiTAEiL:TY
tD)
_
ASS-
POT°N71AL FOR -AU TAT = ENEN-s
POTENi 'AL A5 JAPi?AT FOR:
6
'6RAiN OVERASS S( G-D
;NA.04 :COYiFco+c_RUS
(vF?AND(a-A ' Si(Q' D :IJW]DLD
I+IEILA':TRANCE 0:
-i PFASE--
SEED LE:JME ' 'ERR.
TREES !PLANTS 1
PLANTS :DATER 'a1LDLF :N11—m C
'WILDLF 'WILD`F
'DRA ED
??„R (FA:..'AIR
'FAR .FAIR
!MOD
'�D .FAIR 'FAIR
'fi OD
;ONDRAiN D
IY. POC'RTOM 'Y. POOWPGOR ;Y. POOR!
:60OD
'GOOD V. 0MI RtMR
'COOD '
'
I
PO- NTIAL NA '.'e PLANT CLe .k�f:TY (RANELAND OR FOREST :.ND T ET T
�?! � �t5 ORY YECc A ID<Y)
' PLANT.
PERCLYACE CUMPOST10N (DRY WEIC::T) BY CLASS DE—R7iNIN6 PHASE
COMMON PLANT NAME : SY+1?JL '
ALL
(NLSPN) t'
I
'L:T E °LL'ES:E`:
'SCSC
6
PANiCUM
(PANIC
6
BEN ANN PLUtEVASS
:ERCO2 1.
1.3
i
'
:LDNe-EA,c L'NIOLA
44
SiITC:CANE
IARTE4*
10
SEDE
'CARE( I
6
1
-IOTNO wRL+ES
'SUSS
6
!S-7`1) PANICLUM
'PAAN '
3
(
)
(
I S 6 S'0.SIEM
(ANYi2
6 i
L
l POTE9:TIAL PRODUCTION (LSS.IAC. DRY;M: '
'
FAYORA2LE YEARS (
`zo
:
(
'
NORMAL YEARS
1950
C
IIUFAVQRADLE 'FEARS
1550
I
..
A ESTIMATES RACED ON EST DATA OF Z PEDO#U FROM 30A? 0 L COUNTY, Sc.
I i RATINGS BASED ON tSH1 PART 603, JL Y 19E3.
RATiNCS EASED ON N-M, M°T. 1960.
q J NiLC,i= RATiM6S EACED Q' w1; KEMORANDiU;n 74, JAN. 19TB.
J�

NORFOLK

Official Series Description - NORFOLK Series Page 1 of 4
LOCATION NORFOLK NC+AL AR FL: GA MD SC VA
- Established Series
BJW:ENH:AG, Rev. MHC
6/97
NORFOLK SERIES
The Norfolk series consists of very deep, well drained, moderately permeable soils that formed in
loamy marine sediments of the Coastal Plains. These upland soils have slopes ranging from 0 to 10
percent. Near the type location the mean annual temperature is 62 degrees F., and the mean annual
precipitation is approximately 49 inches.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Fine -loamy, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kandiudults
TYPICAL PEDON: Norfolk loamy sand --cultivated. (Colors are for moist soil unless otherwise
stated.)
Ap--O to 9 inches; grayish brown (1 OYR 5/2) loamy sand; weak fine and medium granular structure;
very friable; few fine and medium roots; some darker -colored material in old root channels; strongly
acid; clear smooth boundary. (3 to 10 inches thick)
E--9 to 14 inches; light yellowish brown (1 OYR 6/4) loamy sand; weak medium granular structure;
very friable; few fine and medium roots-, some darker -colored material in old root channels; strongly
acid; clear smooth boundary. (0 to 10 inches thick)
Bt1--14 to 17 inches; yellowish brown (1 OYR 5/6) sandy loam; weak medium subangular blocky
structure; friable; few fine and medium roots; strongly acid; clear wavy boundary.
L_ Bt2--17 to 38 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 516) sandy clay loam; weak medium subangular
blocky structure; friable; many fine and medium pores; few faint clay films on faces of peds; strongly
acid; gradual wavy boundary.
Bt3--38 to 58 inches; yellowish brown (1 OYR 5/6) sandy clay loam; few fine faint soft masses of iron
accumulation of strong brown, pale brown, and yellowish red; weak medium subangular blocky
structure; friable; few faint clay films on faces of peds; strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
Bt4--58 to 70 inches; yellowish brown (1 OYR 5/6) sandy clay loam; common medium distinct
yellowish red (5YR 5/8) soft masses pf iron accumulation, pale brown (I OYR 6/3) and light brownish
gray (1 OYR 6/2) iron depletions; weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable; few firm
yellowish red plinthite nodules; strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary. (Combined thickness of Bt
�j horizon is 40 to more than 60 inches)
BC--70 to 82 inches; mottled brownish yellow (1 OYR 616), strong brown (7.5YR 516), yellowish red
(5YR 516) sandy clay loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable; approximately 5
percent firm, brittle nodules of plinthite; strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary. (7 to 15 inches thick)
C--82 to 100 inches; mottled red (2.5YR 4/8), strong brown (7.5YR 5/8), brownish yellow (1 OYR
6/8), and gray (10YR 511) sandy clay loam; massive; friable; strongly acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Robeson County, North Carolina; 1 1/4 miles south.of Parkton; 300 feet west
http://www.statlab.iastate.edu/soils/osd/datfN/NOP,FOLK.htmi 11/23/98

NCO037 S O I L I N T E R P R E T A T I O N S R E C O R D NORFOLK SERIES
MLRA(S): 133A, 153A, 149A
REV. RAG. 2-89
TYPIC KANDIUDULTS. FINE -LOAMY, SILICEOUS, THERMIC
THE NORFOI.K SERIES CONSISTS OF WELL DRAINED NEARLY LEVEL TO SLOPING SOILS ON UPLANDS IN THE COASTAL PLAIN. IN A
REPRESENTATIVE PROFILE, THE SURFACE LAYER IS GRAYISH BROWN LOAMY SAND ABOUT 9 INCHES THICK. THE SUBSURFACE LAYER IS
LIGIIT YELLOWISH GROWN LOAMY SAND, 5 INCHES THICK. THE SUBSOIL EXTENDS TO A DEPTH OF 82 INCHES. IT IS YELLOWISH BROWN
SANDY LOAM IN THE UPPER PART, YELLOWISH BROWN SANDY CLAY LOAM IN THE MIDDLE PART AND MOTTLED BROWNISH YELLOW, STRONG
BROWN, YELLOWISH RED SANDY CLAY LOAM IN THE LOWER PART. SLOPES ARE 0 TO 10 PERCENT.
LANDSCAPE AND CLIMATE PROPERTIES
ANNUAL AIR
FROST FREE
ANNUAL ELEVATION
DRAINAGE
SLOPE
TEMPERATURE
DAYS
PRECIPITATION (FT)
CLASS
(PCT1
I 0 10
Lb
IMAItD SOIL PROPERTIES
(A)
DEPTH
(IN.)
USDA
TEXTURE
UNIFIED
FRACT.
FRACT.
PERCENT OF MATERIAL LESS
CLAY
AASHTO
>10 IN
3-10 IN
THAN
3" PASSING SIEVE
NO.
0-14
SL, FSL
SM.
SM-SC, SC
A-2
(PCT)
(PCT)
(PCT)
4 10 40
200
0-14
LS, LFS
SM
0
0
95-100
95-100 50-91
15-33
5-18
14-38
SL, SCL,
CL
SC,
SM-SC, CL, CL-ML
A-2
A-2, A-4, A-6
O
0
95-100
92-100 50-95
13-30
2-8
38-70
SCL, CL,
SC
SC,
SM-SC, CL, CL-ML
A-4, A-6, A-7-6
0
O
0
95-100
91-100 70-96
30-63
18-35
70-99
VAR
0
100
98-100 65-98
36-72
20-43
DEPTH
LIQUID
PLAS-
MOIST BULK
PERMEA-
AVAILABLE
SO[L
SALINITY
SAR
CEC
CAC03
GYPSUM
(IN.)
LIMIT
TICITY
DENSITY
BILITY
WATER CAPACITY
REACTION
INDEX
(G/CM3)
(IN/HR)
(IN IN)
(PH)
IMMHOS
CMI
(ME 100G1
(PCT)
(PCT)
0-1.1
<25
NP-14
1.45-1.65
2.0-6.0
0.10-0.15
3.6-6.0
-
0-14
20
NP
1.55-1.70
6.0-20
0.06-0,11
3.6-6.0
-
14-38
20-38
4-15
1.30-1.65
0.6-2.0
0.10-0.18
3.6-5.5
-
38-70
20-52
4-23
1..20-1.65
0.6-2.0
0.12-0.18
3.6-5.5
-
70-99
DEPTH
ORGANIC
SHRINK-
OS ER
;ION
WIND WIND
CDRROSIVITY
(IN.)
MATTER
SWELL
FACTORS
EROD . EROD.
(PCT)
POTENTIAL
K
T
5
GROUP INDEX STEEL CONCRETE
3 - MODERATE HIGH
0-14
5-2
LOW
.20
0-14
.5-2
LOW
.17
5
2
14-38
LOW
.24
38-70
LOW
.24
70-99
FLOODING
HIGH
WATER TABLE
CEMENTED PAN
BEDROCK
SUBSIDENCE
HYD
POTENT'L
DEPTH
(FTI
KIND MONTHS
DEPTH HARDNESS
DEPTH
HARDNESS
INIT. TOTAL
GRP
FROST
F REOUENCY
DURATION
MONTHS
NONE
(IN)
(IN)
(IN) (IN)
ACTION
4.0-6.0 APPARENT JAN-MAR
-
1 >60
1
1 g I
-
v

NORFOLK 5 ES
SANITARY FACIITTIFC IF1
NCO037
- -----
0-8%: MODERATE-WETNESS,PERCS SLOWLY
LUNV IKULI IUN MAILRI AL (B)
SEPTIC TANK
8-10%: MODERATE-WETNESS,PERCS SLOWLY,SLOPE
GOOD -'
ABSORPTION
ROADFILL
FIELDS
0-7%: MODERATE-SEEPAGE,WETNE55
IMPROBABLE -EXCESS FINES
SEWAGE
7+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
LAGOON
SAND
AREAS
SANITARY
SEVERE -WETNESS
IMPROBABLE -EXCESS FINES
LANDFILL
GRAVEL
(TRENCH)
SANITARY
O-IIA: MODERATE -WETNESS -
8-10%: MODERATE-WETNESS,SLOPE
FAIR -TOO CLAYEY,SMALL STONES
.LANDFILL
TOPSOIL
(AREA)
O-8"/.: FAIR-T00 CLAYEY
DAILY
8-10%: FAIR -TOO CLAYEY,SLOPE
COVER ,F OR
WATER MANAGEMENT (B)
0-3%: MODERATE -SEEPAGE
LANDFILL
POND,
RESERVOIR
3-8%: MODERATE-SEEPAGE,SLOPE
B+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
AREA
BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT (8)
0-8%: MODERATE -WETNESS.
SEVERE -PIPING
SHALLOW
8-10%: MODERATE-WETNESS,SLOPE
EMBANKMENTS
EXCAVATIONS
DIKES AND
LEVEES
DWELLINGS
SLIGHT
8-10'%: MODERATE -SLOPE
MODERATE -DEEP TO WATER,SLOW REFILL
WITHOUT
EXCAVATED
BASEMENTS
PONDS
AQUIFER FED
O-8.4. MODERATE -WETNESS
DEEP TO WATER
DWELLINGS
a-10%: MODERATE-WETNESS,SLOPE
WITH
DRAINAGE
BASEMENTS
'
SMALL
0 -4%: SLIGHT
J-8%: MODERATE -SLOPE
9-3% SL, FSL: SOIL BLOWING
COMMERCIAL
8+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
3+% SL, FSL: SLOPE,SOIL BLOWING
BUILDINGS
IRRIGATION
0-3% LS, LFS: FAST INTAKE,SOIL BLOWING
3+% LS, LFS: SLOPE,FAST INTAKE
LOCAL
0-8/: SLIGHT
8-10%: MODERATE -SLOPE
O-8/: SOIL BLOWING
ROADS AND
TERRACES
8+%: SLOPE,SOIL BLOWING
STREETS
AND
DIVERSIONS
LAWNS.
O-8'% SL, FSL: SLIGHT
LANDSCAPING
8-10"/. SL, FSL: MODERATE -DROUGHTY
GRASSED
0-B%: FAVORABLE
8+%:
AND GOLF
0-8%: MODERATE -DROUGHTY
WATERWAYS
SLOPE
FAIRWAYS
8+r% LS, LFS: MODERATE-DROUGHTY,SLOPE

NORFOLK SERIES
DCrDCATinu Ai
NCO037
.
0-8""%: SLIGHT
0-24: SLIGHT -
8-10%: MODERATE -SLOPE
2-6%: MODERATE -SLOPE
CAMP AREAS
PLAYGROUNDS
6+%: SEVERE -SLOPE
0-8%: SLIGHT
SLIGHT
8-10%: MODERATE -SLOPE
PATHS
PICNIC AREAS
AND
------------
TRAILS
CLASS-
DETERMINING
PHASE
CAP A-
BILI Ty
COTTON
LINT
I (LBS)
TOBACCO
(LBS)
CORN
(BU)
SOYBEANS
(BU)
WHEAT
(BU)
PEANUTS
(LBS)
PASTURE
(AUM)
NIRR
IRR.
NIRR
IRR..
NIRR
IRR.
NIRR
IRR.
NIRR
IIRR.
NIRR
IRR.
NIRR
IRR.
NIRR
IRR.
0-2%
1
700
3000
110:
40
60
4000
10.5
2-6%
2E
650
2900
f00
35
55.
3700
10.0
6-10%
3E
600
2700
90
30
50
3300
9.5
i
CLASS-
DETERMINING
ORD
SYM
MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS
POTENTIAL PRODUCTIVITY
TREES TO PLANT
EROS'N
EQUIP.
SEEDL.
WINDTH
PLANT
COMMON TREES
SITE
PROD
PHASE
HAZARD
LIMIT
MORT'Y
HAZARD
COMPET
INOX
CLAS
ALL
SA
SLIGHT
SLIGHT
SLIGHT
SLIGHT
MODER.
LOBLOLLY PINE
84
8
LOBLOLLY PINE
LONGLEAF PINE
77
7
SLASH PINE
78
10
SOUTHERN RED OAK
WHITE OAK
YELLOW POPLAR
BLACKGUM
HICKORY

NORFOLK S 7S
NC0037
CLASS-DETERMIN'G Ph1ASE
SPECIES
HT
SPECIES
HT
SPECIES
HT
SPECIES
hIT
NONE
—
CLASS-
POTENTIAL
FOR HABITAT
ELEMENTS
POTENTIAL
AS
HABITAT
FOR:
DETERMINING
GRAIN 8
GRASS 8
WILD
HARDWD
CONIFER
SHRUBS
WETLAND
SHALLOW
OPENED
WOODED
WETLAND
RANGELD
PHASE
SEED
LEGUME
HERB.
TREES
PLANTS
PLANTS
WATER
WILDLF
WILDLF
WILDLF
WILDLF
0-6%
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
-
POOR
V. POOR
GOOD
GOOD
V. POOR
-
6-10'%
FAIR
GOOD
GOOD
G00D
GOOD
-
V. POOR
V. POOR
GOOD
GOOD
V. POOR
-
____
__.._. __...
PLANT
._..... .........��...... ..,. ....aaI
PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION
---L -V-I v...
(DRY WEIGIiT)
1LUN
BV CLASS DETERMINING
PHASE
COMMON PLANT NAME
SYMBOL
(NLSPN)
AMERICAN HOLLY
ILOP
FLOWERING DOGWOOD
COFL2
PERSIMMON
DIMS
BLUERIDGE BLUEBERRY
VAVA
GREENBRIER
SMILA2
,
POTENTIAL PRODUCTION (LBS./AC. DRY WT):
FAVORABLE YEARS
NORMAL YEARS
UNFAVORABLE YEARS
j
A ESTIMATES OF ENGINGEERING PROPERTIES BASED ON 2 PEDONS FROM ROBEESON AND WAYNE COUNTIES, ADDITIONAL UNIFIED ENTIRES
A FOR LINESnd ARE SM. ML AND MH.
B RATINGS BASED ON NSH. 7/83.
C WOODLAND RATINGS BASED ON NATIONAL FORESTRY MANUAL, SEPT. 1980
D WILDLIFE RATTINGS BASED ON SOILS MEMORANDUM-74. JAN 1972.

POCALLA

LOCATION POCALLA SC+NC
Established Series
Rev. RLV:ECH
1/91
POCALLA SERIES
'! The Pocalla series consists of very deep, somewhat excessively drained,
moderately permeable'soils that formed in sandy and -loamy sediments on
marine terraces. The soils are on nearly level or gently sloping low
ridges on Coastal Plain. Slopes range from 0 to 6 percent.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Loamy, siliceous, thermic Arenic Plinthic Paleudults
TYPICAL PEDON: Pocalla sand --cultivated. (Colors are for moist soil.)
Ap--O to 8 inches; dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) sand; weak medium
granular structure; loose; common fine roots; moderately acid; abrupt
smooth boundary. (7 to 9 inches thick)
E--8 to 23 inches; pale brown (10YR 6/3) loamy sand; weak medium
granular structure; loose; few fine roots; moderately acid; clear smooth
boundary. (13 to 23 inches thick)
Bt--23 to 36 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) sandy loam; weak
medium subangular blocky structure; very friable; few fine roots; few
fine pores; sand grains coated and bridged with clay; strongly acid;
gradual wavy boundary. (6 to 15 inches thick)
E1--36 to 46 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) loamy sand; single
grained; loose; few fine roots; few fine pores; common medium sized
pockets of pale brown (10YR 6/3) uncoated sand grains; strongly acid;
'- gradual wavy boundary. (8 to 24 inches thick)
Btvl--46 to 60 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) sandy clay loam;
common medium yellowish red (5YR 5/8), strong brown (7.5YR 5/6), and
pale brown (10YR 6/3) mottles; weak medium subangular blocky structure;
friable; few fine roots,; few fine.pores; common medium nodules of
plinthite (about 10 percent); strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary. (10
to 30 inches thick)
j Btv2--60 to 72 inches; mottled yellowish brown (10YR 5/6), strong
brown (7.5YR 5/6), yellowish red (5YR 5/8), and gray (10YR 6/1) sandy
_ clay loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable; common fine
pores; common medium nodules of plinthite (about 15 percent); very
strongly acid. -
TYPE LOCATION: Marion County, South Carolina; 7.5 miles north of
Marion; 700 feet north of intersection of U.S. Highway 501 and South
Carolina Highway 22; 300 feet west of U.S. Highway 501.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Solum thickness is 72 to more than 80 inches.
The soil ranges from very strongly acid to neutral in the A horizon and
is very strongly acid or strongly acid throughout the rest of the
profile. Nodules of plinthite range from common to many in the Btv
horizon.

PAGE 02
The A or Ap horizon has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 4 or 5, and chroma
of 2. It is sand, loamy sand, fine sand, or loamy fine sand.
The E horizon has hue of 10YR, value of 5 to 7, and chroma of 3 to 8. It
is sand, loamy sand, fine sand, or loamy fine sand.
The Bt horizon has hue of 7.5YR or 10YR, value of 5 or 6, and chroma of
4 to 8. It is.sandy loam.
The E' horizon or the B/E horizon has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 5 to
8, and chroma of 2 to 8. It is sand or loamy sand.
The Btv horizon commonly is mottled in shades of yellow, brown, red, or
gray. Some pedons have a matrix with hue of 7.5YR or 10YR, value of 5
or 6, and chroma of 4 to 8 with mottles in shades of red, brown, yellow,
or gray. The Btv horizon is sandy loam or sandy clay loam with more
than 5 percent nodules of plinthite.
COMPETING SERIES: These are the Doucette, Lilbert, and Stilson series
in the same family, plus the Blanton, Bonneau, Brogdon, Eustis, Fuquay,
Kenansville, Lucy, Troup, and Wagram series in similar families.
Bonneau, Doucette, Fuquay, Kenansville, Lilbert, Lucy, Stilson, and
Wagram soils are not bisequal. Blanton and Troup soils are grossarenic.
Brogdon soils have A and E horizons less than 20 inches thick. Eustis
soils have a sandy particle -size control section.
_ GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Pocalla soils are.on nearly level or gently sloping
low ridges of the Coastal Plain. Slope gradients are 0 to 6 percent.
The soil formed in unconsolidated sandy and loamy Coastal Plain
deposits. The average annual rainfall ranges from 42 to 50 inches, mean
annual air temperature ranges from 62 to 66 degrees F., and the
frost -free season ranges from 220 to 250 days.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: These are the similar and competing
Blanton, Bonneau, Brogdon, Eustis, Fuquay, Lucy, and Wagram series plus
the Dothan, Goldsboro, Lakeland, Lynchburg, and Norfolk series. Dothan,
Norfolk, Goldsboro, and Lynchburg soils have a fine -loamy particle -size
control section. Lakeland soils are sandy throughout and do not have an
argillic horizon.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Somewhat excessively drained; slow runoff.
Permeability is moderately rapid in the upper subsoil and moderate in
- the lower subsoil. These soils have a perched water table primarily
during winter and early spring.
USE AND VEGETATION: Most of these soils have been cleared and used for
growing cotton, corn, soybeans, and other crops. Forested areas are in
pine with scattered mixed hardwoods.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Middle and Lower Coastal Plain of South
Carolina and North Carolina. The series is of moderate extent.
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Sumter County, South Carolina; 1969.
REMARKS: Diagnostic horizons and features recognized in this pedon are:
Ochric epipedon - the zone from the surface of the soil to 23 inches (Ap

PAGE 03
and E horizons)
Argillic horizon - the zone from 23 to 36 inches and from 46 to 72
inches (Bt, Btvl and Btv2 horizons)
MIRA = 133A, 153A
I! SIR = SCO045
'~ National Cooperative Soil Survey
U.S.A.
�I
I
i

�:0045 SOIL I NTERPRETAT I ONS RECORD
ti
POCALLA SERIES
RA(S): 133A, 153A
RLV, 5-91
Am.alC PLINTHIC PALEUDULTS, LOAMY, SILICEOUS, THERMIC
[ESE ARE VERY DEEP, MODERATELY PERMEABLE SOILS ON THE COASTAL PLAIN. IN A REPRESENTATIVE PROFILE, THE SURFACE LAYER IS
LARK GRAYISH BROWN SAND 8 INCHES THICK. THE SUBSURFACE LAYER IS PALE BROWN LOAMY SAND 15 INCHES THICK. THE SUBSOIL, FROM
73 TO 36 INCHES IS YELLOWISH BROWN SANDY LOAM. BELOW THIS IS YELLOWISH BROWN LOAMY SAND FROM 36 TO 46 INCHES. BELOW THIS
A DEPTH OF 72 INCHES IS MOTTLED. BROWN, RED AND GRAY SANDY CLAY LOAM.
LANDSCAPE AND CLIMATE PROPERTIES
ANNUAL AIR FROST FREE 'ANNUAL ELEVATION DRAINAGE SLOPE
TEMPERATURE I DAYS I PRECIPITATION I (FT) I CLASS I (PCT)
I 62-66 1 220-250 42-50 I 40-215 1 SE I 0-6
ESTIMATED'SOIL PROPERTIES
iEPTHI I I 1FRACT.IFRACT.IPERCENT OF MATERIAL LESS ICLAY I
IkIN.)1 USDA. TEXTURE I UNIFIED I AASHTO 1>10 IN13-10INI THAN 3" PASSING SIEVE NO.1 I
I I I I 1(PCT) ((PCT) 1 4. 1 10 1 40 1 200 I(PCT.)1.
1-23 IS,FS 1SP-SM,SM IA-2,A-3 1 0 1 0 1100 100 50-70 5-20 12-12 1
1-23 1LFS,LS ISP-SM,SM IA-2 1 0 1 0 1100 100 50-70 11-27 12-12 1
123-361SL ISM 1A-2 1 0 1 0 1100 100 50-75 15-30 110-251
6-461S,LS 1SP-SM,SM [A-2,A-3 1 0 [ 0 '1100 100 50-75 5-20 12-10 1
6-721SCL,SL 1SC-SM,SC,SM IA-2,A-4,A-6 1 0 1 0 1100 100 60-80 28-50 110-351'
1 1 1 1 1 'I I I I
'nEPTHILIQUID 1PLAS- I MOIST BULK I PERMEA- I AVAILABLE I SOIL I SALINITY I SAR I CEC -1 CAC03 I GYPSUM I
IN.)1 LIMIT ITICITYI DENSITY I BILITY IWATER CAPACITY( REACTION I I I I I
I 11NDEX I (G/CM3) I (IN/HR) 1 (IN/IN) I (PH) I(MMHOS/CM)1 I(ME/100G)1 (PCT) I (PCT) I
In-23 I I NP 1 1.60-1.70 1 6.0-20.0 1 0.07-0.10 1 4.5-6.5 1 1 1 2-4 1 1 1
I NP 1 1.60-1.70 1 6.0-20.0 1 0.08-0.11 1 4.5-6.5 1 1 1 2-7 1 1 1
_ 3-361 15-25 1 NP-4 1 1.55-1.70 1 2.0-6.0 1 0.10-0.13 1 4.5-5.5- 1 1 1 1-3 1 1 1
136-461 1 NP 1 1.65-1.80 1 6.0-20 1 0.06-0.10 1 4.5-5.5 1 1 1 1-2 1 1 1
-'16-721 15-35 1 3-15 1 1.50-1.75 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.10-0.13 1 4.5-5.5 1 1 1 1-4 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I I I I I
'IdEPTHIORGANICI SHRINK- I EROSION IWIND I WIND I CORROSIVITY I
I(IN.)IMATTER I SWELL I FACTORS 1ER00.1 EROD. I I
I (PCT) 1POTENTIALI K I Kf1 T IGROUPI INDEX I STEEL 1CONCRETEI
-,A-23 1 .5-1 1 LOW 1.101.101 5 1 1 1 220 1. LOW 1 HIGH I
10-23 1 .5-1 1 LOW 1.101.101 5 1 2 1 134 1
•3-361 0-.5 1 LOW 1.101.101 1 I 1
.6-461 0-.5 1 LOW 1.101.101
146-721 0-.5 1 LOW 1.151.151
FLOODING I HIGH WATER TABLE I CEMENTED PAN I BEDROCK (SUBSIDENCE 1HYDIPOTENT'L1
I DEPTH I KIND IMONTHS IDEPTHIRARDNESSIOEPTH IHARDNESSIINIT.ITOTALIGRPI FROST I
FREQUENCY I DURATION (MONTHS I (FT) I - I I (IN)I 1 '(IN) I I(IN) 1(IN) I I ACTION 1
NONE I 1 1 >4.0 IPERCHED 1DEC-MAR1 1 1 >60 1 I 1 1 A I I
r

CALLA SERIES SC0045
SANITARY FACILITIES (A)-
CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL (A)
IMODERATE-WETNESS
II
IGOOD I
TIC TANK
I
II
ABSORPTION
I
II ROADFILL
I I
FIELDS
I
II
I I
ISEVERE-SEEPAGE
II
(IMPROBABLE -EXCESS FINES I
' SEWAGE
I
II
I I
LAGOON
I
II SAND
I
AREAS
I
II
I I
]SLIGHT
II
(IMPROBABLE -EXCESS FINES ]
SANITARY
I
II
I I
LANDFILL
I
GRAVEL
I I
(TRENCH)
I
,II
II
I I
I
II
I I
I
ISEVERE-SEEPAGE
II
ILS,LFS:FAIR-TOO SANDY I
SANITARY
I
II
IS,FS:POOR-T00 SANDY I
LANDFILL
1
II' TOPSOIL
I I
(AREA)
IGOOD
II
DAILY
I
II -
WATER MANAGEMENT (A)
I COVER FOR
I
II
ISEVERE-SEEPAGE I
' LANDFILL
I
II POND
I I
RESERVOIR
I I
II AREA
I I
BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT (A)
]SEVERE-CUTBANKS CAVE
II
ISEVERE-PIPING I
SHALLOW
I
IIEMBANKMENTS
I I
(EXCAVATIONS
I
II DIKES AND
I I
II LEVEES
I ]
I
ISLIGHT
II
ISEVERE-NO WATER I
'-,DWELLINGS
I
II EXCAVATED
WITHOUT
I -
II PONDS
-i BASEMENTS
I
IIAOUIFER FED
I I
(MODERATE -WETNESS
II
IDEEP TO WATER I
,_DWELLINGS.
I
II
I I
WITH
I
II DRAINAGE
I r ]
• BASEMENTS
]
II
I I
I
II
I I
I0-4%:SLIGHT
II
I0-3%:DROUGHTY,FAST INTAKE I
I SMALL
I4-6%:MODERATE-SLOPE -
II
I3-6%:DROUGHTY,FAST INTAKE,SLOPE I
COMMERCIAL
I
II IRRIGATION
I I
;.,-BUILDINGS
I
II
I
I
II
I I
ISLIGHT
11
ISOIL BLOWING I
LOCAL
I
II TERRACES
I I
ROADS AND
I
II AND
I I
'- STREETS
I
II DIVERSIONS
I I
LAWNS, IFS,LFS,LS:MODERATE-DROUGHTY II (DROUGHTY
_.+OSCAPING IS:MODERATE-OROUGHTY,TOO SANDY II GRASSED I
AND GOLF I II WATERWAYS I
FAIRWAYS I I

'ALLA SERIES
SCO045
RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (A)
ILS,LFS:MODERATE-TOO SANDY 11 10-2%LS,LFS:MODERATE-TOO SANDY
JS,FS:SEVERE-TOO SANDY 11 12-6%LS,LFS:MODERATE-SLOPE,TOO SANDY
CAMP AREAS I 11PLAYGROUNDS IS,FS:SEVERE-TOO SANDY
1 11 1 1
ILS,LFS:MODERATE-TOO SANDY 11 ILS,LFS:MODERATE-TOO SANDY
IS,FS:SEVERE-TOO SANDY 11 PATHS IS,FS:SEVERE-TOO SANDY
�ICNIC AREASI 11 AND
1 11 TRAILS
REGIONAL INTERPRETATIONS
CAPABILITY AND YIELDS PER ACRE OF CROPS AND PASTURE (HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT)
I CLASS- I CAPA- (CORN (COTTON ]SOYBEANS ITOBACCO IPEANUTS 1BAHIAGRASS JIMPROVED
DETERMINING I BILITY I FLINT I I I I JBREMUDAGR.
PHASE I I(BU) I(LBS) I(BU) I(LBS) I(LBS) I(AUM) I(AUM)
INIRRIIRR.INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR.
LL 2S 1 1 75 1 1 600 1 1 30 1 12000 1 12500 1 1 8 1 1 9 1 1
WOODLAND SUITABILITY (B)
It CLASS- JORDI MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS I POTENTIAL PRODUCTIVITY
DETERMINING ISYMIEROS'NJEQUIP.ISEEDL.IWINDTHIPLANT
I COMMON TREES
ISITEIPROD1
TREES TO PLANT
PHASE I IHAZARDILIMIT
IMORT'YIHAZAROICOMPETI
IINDXICLASI
'
JALL 18S ISLIGHTIMODER.IMODER.ISLIGHTISLIGHTILOBLOLLY
PINE
180
18
ILOBLOLLY PINE
SLASH PINE
180
110
(SLASH PINE
L tI
ILONGLEAF PINE
170
16
(LONGLEAF PINE

t"tALLA SERIES SCO045
Li
.ASS-DETERMIN'G PHASEI SPECIES IHTI SPECIES IHTI SPECIES IHTI SPECIES IHTI
I NONE I I I I I I I I
I II II II II
I II II II II
I II II II II
I II II II II
WILDLIFE HABITAT SUITABILITY (C)
CLASS- I POTENTIAL FOR HABITAT ELEMENTS I POTENTIAL AS HABITAT FOR: I
DETERMINING IGRAIN &IGRASS &I WILD IHARDWO ICONIFERISHRUBS IWETLANDISHALLOWIOPENLD IWOODLD IWETLANDIRANGELDI
LL IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD I IV. POORIV. POORIGOOD [GOOD IV. POORI
I I I I I I I I I I I I
i I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
POTENTIAL NATIVE PLANT COMMUNITY (RANGELAND OR FOREST UNDERSTORY VEGETATION)
I PLANT I PERCENTAGE COMPOSTION (DRY WEIGHT) BY CLASS DETERMINING PHASE I
COMMON PLANT NAME I SYMBOL I ALL
I (NLSPN) I I I I I [
[TTLE BLUESTEM ISCSC I 33 I I I I [
[ELLIOTT BLUESTEM IANEL 1 11
'°4NICUM IPANIC 1 22 I
IREEAWN IARIST I6 I [ I I I
i_AKNOWNS IUUUU 1 28 f I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
POTENTIAL PRODUCTION (LBS./AC. DRY WT): I
i FAVORABLE YEARS I 1100
NORMAL YEARS I 900
FOOTNOTES
(RATINGS BASED ON NSH, PART 603, JULY 1983.
WOODLAND RATINGS BASED ON NFM, SEPT. 1980.
C WILDLIFE RATINGS BASED ON SOILS MEMORANDUM 74, JAN. 1972.
"THIS IS A RATING OVERRIDE. SEE THE INTERPRETATION OVERRIDE FILE FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THIS OVERRIDE.

PORTSMOUTH
r?

LOCATION PORTSMOUTH
Established Series
Rev. JHW:EWH
6/88
PORTSMOUTH SERIES
NC+DE FL GA MD NJ SC VA
The Portsmouth series consists of very poorly drained, moderately
permeable soils formed in loamy textured marine and fluvial sediments.
These soils are moderately thick over contrasting sandy textural
materials. Slopes range from 0 to 2 percent.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Fine -loamy over sandy or sandy -skeletal, mixed, thermic
Typic Umbraquults
TYPICAL PEDON: Portsmouth fine sandy loam --cultivated. (Colors are for
moist soil unless otherwise stated.)
Ap--O to 12 inches; black (10YR 2/1) fine sandy loam; weak medium
granular structure; very friable; many fine roots; medium acid; gradual
wavy boundary. (10 to 20 inches thick)
Eg--12 to 19 inches; gray (10YR 5/1) fine sandy loam; weak medium
granular structure; very friable; few fine and medium roots; medium
acid; gradual wavy boundary. (0 to 8 inches thick)
BEg--19 to 23 inches; gray (10YR 5/1) and dark gray (10YR 4/1) fine
sandy loam; common medium distinct brownish yellow (10YR 6/8) and yellow
(10YR 7/8) mottles; weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable;
I slightly sticky, slightly plastic; common fine pores and old root
channels; common medium flakes of mica; strongly acid; gradual wavy
boundary. (0 to 6 inches thick)
Btg--23 to 35 inches; gray (10YR 5/1) and dark gray (10YR 4/1) sandy
clay loam with pockets and lenses of sandy clay and sandy loam; common
_- medium prominent yellowish brown (10YR 5/8), brownish yellow (10YR 6/8),
and yellowish red (5YR 5/8) mottles; weak medium subangular blocky
structure; friable; sticky; plastic; common fine pores and old root
channels; common thin patchy clay f-ilms on faces of peds; common medium
flakes of mica; few medium grains of feldspar minerals; very strongly
acid; clear wavy boundary. (10 to 26 inches thick)
BCg--35 to 38 inches; mottled gray (10YR 5/1), yellowish brown (10YR
6/8) and reddish yellow (5YR 6/8) sandy loam; weak medium subangular
blocky structure; very friable; common medium flakes of mica; few medium
_ grains of feldspar minerals; very strongly acid; clear smooth boundary.
�I (0 to 5 inches thick)
2Cg1--38 to 48 inches; gray (10YR 6/1) sand with few small bodies of
sandy clay loam; single grained; loose; common medium flakes of mica;
few medium grains of feldspar minerals; very strongly acid; abrupt
smooth boundary. (3 to 15 inches thick)
2Cg2--48 to 72 inches; gray (10YR 6/1) and light gray (10YR 7/1) coarse
i sand; single grained; loose; common medium flakes of mica; few small to
large pebbles; strongly acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Washington County, North Carolina; Tidewater Research
Station; 0.7 mile south of U.S. 64 Highway on SR 1119, 75 feet east of

PAGE 02
SR 1119 at utility pole E160.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: The loamy textural horizons are 24 to 40
inches thick over contrasting sandy textural horizons. Reaction of the A
and B horizons ranges from extremely acid to strongly acid unless the
surface has been limed and C horizons range from extremely acid to
medium acid. Mica and other weatherable minerals along with pebbles are
few to common in abundance in most pedons.
The A or Ap horizons typically have hue of 10YR or neutral, value of 2
or 3, and chroma of 0 to 3. The Eg horizon, where present, has hue of
10YR or 5Y, value of 5 to 7, and chroma of 1 or 2. Texture is sandy
loam, fine sandy loam, loam, or their mucky analogues.
The BEg horizon, where present, has hue of 10YR to 5Y, or is neutral,
value of 3 to 6, and chroma of 1 or 2. It typically has mottles in
shades of brown and yellow. It is sandy loam,, fine sandy loam, or loam.
The Btg horizon has hue of 10YR to 5Y, or is neutral, value of 4 to 7,
and chroma of 1 or 2. Mottles, where present, are in shades of brown,
yellow, and red. It is sandy clay loam, loam, or clay loam. Some
pedons have strata or pockets and lenses of sandy clay and sandy loam.
The BCg horizon is similar to the Btg horizon in color. It is loamy sand
or sandy loam and is less than 5 inches thick.
The 2Cg horizon has hue of 10YR to 5Y, or is neutral, value of 5 to 7,
and chroma of 1 or 2. Mottles, where present, are in shades of brown
and yellow. It is sand, loamy fine sand, or loamy sand. Some pedons
contain strata or pockets and lenses of sandy loam, clay loam, or sandy
clay loam.
COMPETING SERIES: The are no other known series in the same family.
Series in closely related families include Bayboro, Byars, Cape Fear,
Deloss, Hyde, Icaria, Lumbee, Pantego, Paxville, Pocomoke, Tomotley,
Torhunta, Wasda, and Weeksville series. Except for Lumbee none of these
soils have strongly contrasting particle -size classes. Lumbee soils
have an ochric epipedon and are siliceous. In addition, Bayboro, Byars,
and Cape Fear soils are clayey. Deloss soils have thicker sola. Hyde
soils are fine=silty. Icaria soils are siliceous and have a spodic
horizon below the argillic horizon. Pantego and Paxville soils are
siliceous and have thicker sola. Pocomoke and Torhunta soils are
siliceous and lack argillic horizons. Tomotley soils have an ochric
epipedon. Wasda soils have a histic epipedon. Weeksville soils are
coarse -silty.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Portsmouth soils are on nearly level flats and
slight depressions of the Atlantic Coastal Flatwoods, generally at
elevations below 25 feet and fluvial stream terraces derived from
material washed from the mountains and piedmont. Slopes range from 0 to
2 percent. The soils formed in loamy and sandy marine and fluvial
sediments. The mean annual temperature is 65 degrees F., and the mean
annual precipitation is 50 inches near the type location.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: In addition to the competing Cape

PAGE 03
Fear, Deloss, Hyde, Tomotley, Wasda, and Weeksville series, these are
Altavista, Arapahoe, Augusta, Conaby, Dragston, Pettigrew, Roanoke,
Roper, State, and Wahee series. Altavista, Augusta, Dragston, Roanoke,
State, and Wahee soils lack umbric epipedons and are on higher landscape
positions. In addition, Dragston soils are coarse -loamy and Roanoke and
Wahee soils are clayey. Arapahoe soils do not have argillic horizons
and are coarse -loamy. Conaby, Pettigrew, and Roper soils have histic
epipedons and lack argillic horizons.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Very poorly drained; runoff is very slow or
ponded; permeability is moderate in the solum and rapid or very rapid in
underlying materials. The water table, unless drained, is generally at
or near the surface during the months of December through April.
USE AND VEGETATION: Drained and cleared areas are cropped to corn,
soybeans, small grain, truck crops, and pasture. Forested areas consist
of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), red maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua), water oak (Quercus nigra), willow oak
(Quercus phellos), sweetbay (Magnolia virginiana), and redbay (Persea
borbonia). Understory species include southern bayberry (Myrica
cerifera), gallberry (Ilex, spp.), reeds (Arundinaria tecta), and
greenbrier (Smilex spp.).
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Lower Coastal Plain of Maryland, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Delaware, and perhaps Alabama,
Florida, and Georgia. The series is of large extent.
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Norfolk area, Virginia; 1902. °
REMARKS: Portsmouth series was formerly classified as fine -loamy,
mixed, thermic Typic Umbraquults. This revision changes' the
classification to fine -loamy over sandy or sandy -skeletal and moves the
type location from Virginia to North Carolina.
Diagnostic horizons and features recognized in this pedon are:
y Umbric epipedon - the zone from the surface to a depth of 12 inches (the
Ap horizon)
Argillic horizon - the zone from a depth of 23 to a depth of 35 inches.
(the Btg horizon)
Aquic moisture regime
Strongly contrasting particle -size class - below a depth of 38 inches.
National Cooperative Soil Survey
U.S.A.

0128 SOIL I NTERPRETAT IONS RECORD PORTSMOUTH SERIES
RA(S): 153A, 133A, 153B, 153C
JHW,ENH, 8-89
I .0 UMBRAQUULTS, FINE -LOAMY OVER SANDY OR SANDY -SKELETAL, MIXED, THERMIC
,E PORTSMOUTH SERIES CONSISTS OF VERY POORLY DRAINED,NEARLY LEVEL SOILS ON FLATS AND SLIGHT DEPRESSIONS ON THE LOWER
__ASTAL PLAIN AND STREAM TERRACES IN A REPRESENTATIVE PROFILE,THE SURFACE LAYER IS BLACK FINE SANDY LOAM ABOUT 12 INCHES
THICK. THE SUBSURFACE LAYER IS GRAY FINE SANDY LOAM ABOUT 7 INCHES THICK. THE SUBSOIL IS MOTTLED GRAY AND DARK GRAY FINE
NOY LOAM IN THE UPPER PART. SANDY CLAY LOAM IN THE MIDDLE PART,AND SANDY LOAM IN THE LOWER PART THE SUBSOIL IS ABOUT
INCHES THICK IS UNDERLAIN BY GRAY SAND AND COURSE SAND TO 72 INCHES. SLOPES RANGE FROM 0 TO 2 PERCENT.
LANDSCAPE AND CLIMATE PROPERTIES
ANNUAL AIR FROST FREE ANNUAL ELEVATION DRAINAGE SLOPE
TEMPERATURE 1 DAYS I PRECIPITATION I (FT) CLASS (PCT)
vv I n_o I
ESTIMATED SOIL PROPERTIES
,_EPTHI
I
I
IFRACT.IFRACT.IPERCENT
OF MATERIAL
LESS
ICLAY I
I(IN.)I USDA TEXTURE
I UNIFIED
I AASHTO
1>10 IN13-10INI THAN 3" PASSING SIEVE NO.1
I
_ I
I
I
[(PCT)
[(PCT)
I 4 I
10 1
40
1 200
I(PCT)1
-19 IMK-SL,MK-FSL,MK-L
ISM,SC-SM,ML,SC
IA-2,A-4
1 0
1 0
198-100
98-100
65-95
30-65
110-251
10-19 ISL,FSL,L
ISM,SC-SM,ML
IA-2,A-4
1 0
1 0
198-100
98-100
65-95
30-65
15-25 1
.--19 ISIL
IML,CL
IA-6,A-7
1 0
1 0
195-100
90-100
85-95
65-80
120-271
9-351L,SCL,CL
ISC,CL-ML,CL
IA-4,A-6
1 0
1 0
I98-100
98-100
75-95
36-70
120-351
1s5-381LS,SL
ISM
IA-2
1 0
1 0
198-100
98-100
50-70
13-35
18-18 1
138-721SR-COS-LS
1SP-SM,SP,SM
IA-1,A-2,A-3
1 0
1 0
198-100
98-100
45-65
3-25
12-10 1
EPTHILIQUID IPLAS- I MOIST BULK I PERMEA- I AVAILABLE I SOIL I SALINITY I SAR I CEC I CAC03 I GYPSUM I
IN.)1 LIMIT ITICITYI DENSITY I :BILITY IWATER CAPACITY[ REACTION I I I I I I
1 15-30 INP-10 1 1.10-1.30 1 2.0-6.0 1 0.15-0.20 1 3.6-5.5
-19 1 15-30 I NP-7 1 1.30-1.40 1 0.6-6.0 1 0.12-0.18 1 3.6-5.5
10-19 1 30-45 110-25 1 1.50-1.60 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.18-0.24 1 3.6-5.5
'(9-351 18-40 1 7-18 1 1.45-1.55 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.14-0.20 1 3.6-5.5
�5-381 15-18 I NP-4 1 1.40-1.60 1 2.0-6.0 1 0.06-0.10 1 3.6-5.5
1-3-721_ I NP 1 1.40-1.65 1 6.0-20 1 0.02-0.05 1 3.6-6.0
IDEPTHIORGANICI SHRINK- I EROSION IWIND I WIND I CORROSIVITY 1
IN.)IMATTER I SWELL I FACTORS IEROD.1 EROD. I 1
I (PCT) 1POTENTIALI K I KfI T IGROUPI INDEX I STEEL ICONCRETEI
10-19 1 8-15 1 LOW 1.241.241 5 1 3 1 86 1 HIGH I HIGH I
-19 1 3-8 1 LOW 1.241.241 5 1 3 1 86 1
-19 1 3-15 1 LOW 1.321.321 5 1 5- 1 56 1
119-351 I LOW 1.281.281
115-381 1 LOW 1.171.171
B-721 I LOW 1.171.171
FLOODING IHIGH WATER TABLE I CEMENTED PAN I BEDROCK (SUBSIDENCE 1HYDIPOTENT'L1
I I DEPTH I KIND IMONTHS IDEPTHIHARONESSIDEPTH IHARONESSIINIT.ITOTALIGRPI FROST I
FREQUENCY I DURATION IMONTHS I (FT) I I I (IN)I I (IN) I I(IN) I(IN) I I ACTION I
NONE- RARE[ I 10-1.OIAPPARENTINOV-MAYI 1 1 >60 1 1 1 IB/DI I

JRTSMOUTH SERIES
NCO128
SANITARY FACILITIES (A) CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL (A)
ISEVERE-WETNESS,POOR FILTER II (POOR -WETNESS
'IC TANK I II I 1
(--,SORPTION I II ROADFILL I I
FIELDS I II I I
ISEVERE-SEEPAGE,WETNESS
II
(PROBABLE I
SEWAGE
1
II
1 I
LAGOON
1
11 SAND
I I
AREAS
I
I
11
II
I I
I I
ISEVERE-SEEPAGE,WETNESS,T00 SANDY
II
(IMPROBA8LE-T00 SANDY I
SANITARY
I
II
I I
LANDFILL
I
II GRAVEL
I I
(TRENCH)
I
1
II
II
I I
I I
ISEVERE-SEEPAGE,WETNESS:
II
(POOR -WETNESS I
SANITARY
I
II
I I
LANDFILL
I
II TOPSOIL
I I
(AREA)
I
I
II
II
I I
I I
(POOR-SEEPAGE,TOO SANDY,WETNESS
II
DAILY
I
II
WATER MANAGEMENT (A)
COVER FOR
I
11
ISEVERE-SEEPAGE I
LANDFILL
I
11 POND
I I
I
11 RESERVOIR
I 1
11 AREA
I I
BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT (A)
II
I
ISEVERE-CUTBANKS CAVE,WETNESS II ISEVERE-SEEPAGE,PIPING,WETNESS I
SHALLOW I IIEMBANKMENTS I I
1EXCAVATIONS I II DIKES AND I I
II LEVEES I I
I II I I
-� INONE:SEVERE-WETNESS II ]SEVERE-CUTBANKS CAVE I
I DWELLINGS IRARE:SEVERE-FLOODING,WETNESS 11 EXCAVATED I I
WITHOUT I II PONDS I I
BASEMENTS I 11AQUIFER FED I I
I
I
II
I I
'.
INONE:SEVERE-WETNESS
II
ICUTBANKS CAVE I
DWELLINGS
IRARE:SEVERE-FLOODING,WETNESS
II
I I
I WITH
I
II DRAINAGE
I I
J,BASEMENTS
I
II
I I
_
INONE:SEVERE-WETNESS
II
IMK-SL,MK-FSL,MK-L,SL,FSL:WETNESS,SOIL BLOWINGI
I SMALL
IRARE:SEVERE-FLOODING,WETNESS
II
ISIL:WETNESS I
,COMMERCIAL
I
II IRRIGATION
IL:WETNESS,SOIL BLOWING I
}.BUILDINGS
1
I
Ilxxx �
I 1
ISEVERE-WETNESS
II
IMK-SL,MK-FSL,MK-L,SL,FSL:WETNESS,T00 SANDY, I
LOCAL
I
II TERRACES
I SOIL BLOWING
ROADS AND AND
I
II AND
ISIL:WETNESS I
I STREETS
I
II DIVERSIONS
IL:WETNESS,SOIL BLOWING I
I
Ilx:x
I I
AWNS,
ISEVERE-WETNESS
11
IWETNESS I
.JSCAPING
I
II GRASSED
I I
AND GOLF
I
II WATERWAYS
I I
FAIRWAYS
I
II
I I

lTSMOUTH SERIES NCO128
RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (A)
INONE:SEVERE-WETNESS II ISEVERE-WETNESS I
IRARE:SEVERE-FLOODING,WETNESS II I I
_,SNP AREAS I IIPLAYGROUNDS I I
I II I I
ISEVERE-WETNESS II ISEVERE-WETNESS I
I II PATHS I I
,ICNIC AREASI II AND I I
I II TRAILS I I
REGIONAL INTERPRETATIONS
ti I I
r I I
CLASS-
I CAPA-
ICORN
ISOYBEANS
IWHEAT
IPASTURE I I I I
DETERMINING
I BILITY
I
I
I
I I I I I
PHASE
I -
I(BU)
I(BU)
I(BU)
I(AUM) I I I I
I
INIRRIIRR.INIRR
IIRR.
INIRR IIRR.
INIRR IIRR.
INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. I
i"RAINED
13W I
1130 I
145 I_
160 I
110 I I I I I I I I
(DRAINED
I
I
)
16W
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
WOODLAND SUITABILITY (B)
I CLASS- IORDI MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS I POTENTIAL PRODUCTIVITY I I
? p DETERMINING ISYMIEROS'NIEQUIP.ISEEDL.IWINDTHIPLANT I COMMON TREES ISITEIPRODI TREES TO PLANT
I PHASE I IRAZARDILIMIT IMORT'YIHAZARDICOMPETI IINDXICLASI
TALL IIIWISLIGHTISEVEREISEVEREISEVEREISEVEREILOBLOLLY PINE 1101 111 ILOBLOLLY PINE /I
I I I I ISWEETGUM I { ISWEETGUM I
( I I I I I. I IRED MAPLE I I I I
I I I I [WATER OAK I I I I
I I I I IWILLOW OAK I I I I
J i I I I I I I SWEETBAY I I I I
I I I I I I IREDBAY I [ I I
[ I I I [ I I I I I I I
I I I I [ I [ I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
h I I I I I I I I I I I

itTSMOUTH SERIES
NC0128
,ASS-DETERMIN'G PHASE[
SPECIES
IHTI SPECIES IHTI
SPECIES
IHTI
SPECIES IHTI
I
I NONE
I
I
I
II II
II II
II
II
II
II
WILDLIFE HABITAT SUITABILITY
(C)
CLASS-
I
POTENTIAL FOR HABITAT ELEMENTS
I POTENTIAL AS
HABITAT FOR: I
I DETERMINING
IGRAIN
&IGRASS
&I WILD IHARDWO ICONIFERISHRUBS
IWETLANDISHALLOWIOPENLD
IWOOOLD
IWETLANDIRANGELDI
PHASE
I SEED
ILEGUME
I HERB. I TREES IPLANTS I
IPLANTS
I WATER
IWILDLF
IWILDLF
IWILDLF IWILDLF I
VORAINED
IV. POORIPOOR
IPOOR IPOOR (POORI
]GOOD
IGOOD
IPOOR
IPOOR
IGOOD I I
[GRAINED
IFAIR
IGOOD
IGOOD I6000 IGOOD I
IPOOR
IFAIR
(GOOD
IGOOD
IPOOR I I
POTENTIAL NATIVE PLANT
I PLANT
COMMON PLANT NAME I SYMBOL
')UTHERN BAYBERRY
IMYCE I I I I I I
`jiNKBERRY
IILGL I I I I I
ISWITCHCANE
IARTE4* I I I I I I
IEENBRIER
ISMILA2 I I I I I I
IEETBAY
IMAVI2 I I I I I I
Icrn8AY
IPEBO I I ,. I I I I
ERBUSH LYONIA
ILYLU3 I I I I I I
I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
POTENTIAL PRODUCTION (LBS./AC. DRY WT): I I
-�
FAVORABLE YEARS I ] I I I I
i[
NORMAL YEARS
I
UNFAVORABLE YEARS I I I I I I
FOOTNOTES
�IBASED ON NSH, SECTION 603, 7-83. ADDITIONAL ALLOWABLE UNIFIED ENTRIES ARE: LINE #1-CL,CL-ML.
WOODLAND RATINGS BASED ON NATIONAL FORESTRY MANUAL, SEP. 1980.
C WILDLIFE RATINGS BASED ON SOILS MEMO-74, BAN. 1972.
'PLANT TREES ONLY IN AREAS WITH ADEQUATE WATER MANAGEMENT.
CHRISTMAS TREE SPECIES
*"THIS IS A RATING OVERRIDE. SEE THE INTERPRETATION OVERRIDE FILE FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THIS OVERRIDE.

Li
-RAINS \ v
1
L.

Official Series Description - RAINS Series Page 1 of 4
LOCATION RAINS SC+AL FL GA NC VA
Established Series
DJD, Rev. MHC
6/97
RAINS SERIES
The Rains series consists of very deep, poorly drained, moderately permeable soils that formed in
thick loamy sediments on marine terraces. The soils are on nearly level flats or depressions on the
Coastal Plains. Slopes are less than 2 percent.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Fine -loamy, siliceous, semiactive, thermic Typic Paleaquults
TYPICAL PEDON: Rains loamy sand - forested. (Colors are for moist soil.)
A--O to 7 inches; very dark gray (I OYR 3/1) sandy loam; weak fine granular structure; very friable;
many fine and medium roots; very strongly acid; clear smooth boundary. (4 to 10 inches thick)
Eg--7 to 12 inches; light brownish gray (1 OYR 6/2) sandy loam; weak fine granular structure; very
friable; many fine and few medium roots; many fine pores; few fingers of A horizon in upper part;
very strongly acid; clear wavy boundary. (0 to 11 inches thick)
Btgl--12 to 20 inches; gray (1 OYR 6/1) sandy loam; weak coarse subangular blocky structure;
friable; few fine and medium roots;, many fine pores; sand grains coated and bridged with clay; few
medium prominent yellowish brown (I OYR 516) masses of iron accumulation in lower half; very
strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
~ Btg2--20 to 40 inches; gray (I OYR 611) sandy clay loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure;
friable; few fine and medium roots; many fine pores; few faint clay films on faces of peds; few small
pockets of gray sandy loam; common medium prominent yellowish brown (1 OYR 516) masses of
iron accumulation; few fine prominent red masses of iron accumulation; very strongly acid; gradual
wavy boundary.
Btg3--40 to 52 inches; gray (I OYR 6/1) sandy clay loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure;
firm; few fine pores; few faint clay films on faces of peds; few fine and medium prominent red
(2.5YR 4/6), and few fine and medium prominent yellowish brown (I OYR 5/6) masses of iron
accumulation; very strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
j Btg4--52 to 62 inches; gray (10YR 6/1) sandy clay loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure;
friable; few faint clay films on faces of peds; few medium prominent brownish yellow (1 OYR 6/6)
masses of iron accumulation; very strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary. (Combined thickness of
the Bt horizon is more than 40 inches.)
BCg--62 to 79 inches; gray (10YR 6/1) sandy clay loam; weak coarse subangular blocky structure;
friable; few fine distinct brownish yellow masses of iron accumulation; very strongly acid; gradual
wavy boundary. (0 to 20 inches thick)
2Cg--79 to 85 inches; light gray (10YR 7/1) sand; single grained; loose; very strongly acid.
t� TYPE LOCATION: Florence County, South Carolina; 2 miles southeast of Timmonsville; 1.1
miles south of intersection of State Highway 45 and U. S. Highway 76; and 150 feet west of State
Highway 45.
http://www.statlab.iastate.edu/soils/osd/daV?JRAINS.html 10/6/98

Official Series Description - RAINS Series Page 2 of 4
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Solum thickness is more than 60 inches. The soil is extremely
acid to slightly acid in the A and E horizons, and extremely acid to strongly acid throughout the rest
of the profile.
The A or Ap horizon has hue of 1 OYR or 2.5Y, or it is neutral, value of 2 to 5, and chroma of 0 to 2.
It is loam, very fine sandy loam, fine sandy loam, sandy loam, loamy fine sand, loamy sand, or sand.
The E or Eg horizon, where present, has hue of 1 OYR to 5Y, or it is neutral, value of 4 to 7, and
chroma of 0 to 2, with or without masses of iron accumulation with higher chroma. It is loam, very
fine sandy loam, fine sandy loam, sandy loam, loamy fine sand, loamy sand, or sand.
The Btg horizon has hue of 1 OYR to 5Y, or it is neutral, value of 4 to 7, and chroma of 0 to 2. It
commonly has few to many masses of iron accumulation with higher chroma. It commonly is sandy
clay loam or clay loam, but ranges to loam in the upper few inches. The upper 20 inches of the
argillic horizon has less than 30 percent silt. In some pedons the upper part is sandy loam or fine
sandy loam, and the lower part is sandy clay.
The BCg horizon has hue of 10YR to 5Y or it is neutral, value of 4 to 7, and chroma of 0 to 2. It
commonly has few to many masses of iron accumulation with higher chroma. It is sandy loam, fine
sandy loam, sandy clay loam, or sandy clay.
The Cg or 2Cg horizon has hue of 10YR, or it is neutral, value of 5 to 7, and chroma of 0 to 2. Some
pedons have masses of iron accumulation with higher chroma. The Cg or 2Cg horizon texture is
variable, ranging from sand to sandy clay, or it is stratified.
COMPETING SERIES: The Daleville series is the only other known series in this family.
Daleville soils have more than 30 percent silt in the upper 20 inches of the argillic horizon. Similar
series in other families are the Atmore, Coxville, radv, Lumbee, Lvnchburg, Myatt, Ogeechee,
Pansev, Pantego, Paxville, Pelham, Weston, and Woodington series. Atmore and Pansey soils
contain more than 5 percent plinthite in some horizon at depths of less than 60 inches and, in
addition, Atmore soils contain less than 18 percent clay in the upper 20 inches of the Bt horizon.
Coxville and Grady soils contain more than 35 percent clay in the top 20 inches of the Bt horizon.
Lumbee soils have sola 20 to 40 inches thick. Lynchburg soils have higher chroma between the base
of the A or Ap horizon and a depth of 30 inches. Myatt and Ogeechee soils have 20 percent or more
decrease in clay within 60 inches. Pantego and Paxville soils have an umbric epipedon. Pelham soils
have sandy A and E horizons more than 20 inches thick. Weston and Woodington soils have less
than 18 percent clay in the top 20 inches of the Bt horizon.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Rains soils are on nearly level flats and slight depressions in the
Southern Coastal Plain. Slopes are less than 2 percent. The soil formed in loamy Coastal Plain
sediments. Mean annual temperature ranges from 59 to 64 degrees F, and mean annual precipitation
ranges from 38 to 54 inches.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: These are the similar Coxville, Lvnchburg,
Pantego, Paxville, Pelham, and Woodington series, and the Chi l�ev, Dunbar, Goldsboro, Ocilla
Stallings, and Scranton series. Chipley and Scranton soils lack an argillic horizon. Dunbar soils have
more than 35 percent clay in the top 20 inches of the Bt horizon. Goldsboro soils have dominant
chroma of 3 or more between the base of the A or Ap horizons and depths of 30 inches. Ocilla soils
have sandy A and E horizons more than 20 inches thick. Stallings soils have less than 18 percent
clay in the top 20 inches of the Bt horizon.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Poorly drained; slow runoff; moderate permeability.
USE AND VEGETATION: Much of the soil is in forest, mainly of pond and loblolly pine with
some hardwoods. A large acreage is used for growing corn, soybeans, and small grains.
http://www.statlab.iastate.edu/soils/osd/daUR/RAINS.html 10/6/98

Official Series Description - RAINS Series
Page 3 of 4
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Southern Coastal Plain of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North
Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia. The series is extensive.
MLRA OFFICE RESPONSIBLE: Raleigh, North Carolina
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Berkeley County, South Carolina, 1948.
REMARKS: Diagnostic horizons recognized in this pedon are:
Ochric epipedon - the zone from the surface of the soil to 12 inches (A and E horizons).
Argillic horizon - the zone from 12 to 62 inches (Btgl, Btg2, Btg3, and Btg4 horizons).
Aquults feature - dominant chroma of 1 in the matrix of the argillic horizon, and masses of iron
accumulation
Endosaturation - saturation (shown by a dominant chroma of 1) in all layers to a depth of 85 inches
MLRA = 133A, 137, 153A
SOI-5 Soil Name Slope Airtemp FrFr/Seas Precip Elevation
FLO129 RAINS 0- 2 ----
SCO020 RAINS 0- 2 59- 64 190-240 38- 54 40- 450
SCO102 RAINS 0- 2 59- 64 195-220 40- 54 300- 450
SC0116 RAINS 0- 2 59- 64 190-240 38- 54 40- 450
SOI-5 F1oodL F1oodH Watertable Kind Months Bedrock Hardness
FLO129 NONE 0-1.0 APPARENT JUN-JAN 60-60
SCO020 NONE 0-1.0 APPARENT NOV-APR 60-60
SCO102 NONE 0-1.0 APPARENT NOV-MAR 60-60
SC0116 COMMON 0-1.0 APPARENT NOV-APR 60-60
SOI-5 Depth Texture 3-Inch No-10 Clay% -CEC-
FL0129 0-12 S FS 0- 0 98-100 2- 5 -
FL0129 12-62 SCL 0- 0 98-100 18-M -
FL0129 62-85 LS LFS SL 0- 0 95-100 2-15 -
SC0020 0-12 LS LFS S 0- 0 95-100 2-10 1- 4
SCO020 0-12 SL FSL VFSL 0- 0 95-100 5-201- 5
SCO020 0-12 L 0- 0 95-100 7-27 2- 6
SCO020 12-40 FSL SCL SL 0- 0 95-100 18-35 2- 5
SCO020 40-62 SCL CL SC 0- 0 98-100 18-40 2- 7
SCO020 62-79 SL SCL SC 0--0 95-100 15-45 1- 6
SCO102 0-14 SL 0- 2 95-100 5-20 1- 5
SCO102 14-36 SCL SL 0- 2 90-100 18-35 2- 5
SCO102 36-46 CEM - - - -
SC0116 0-12 SL FSL 0- 0 92-100 5-20 1- 5
SC0116 0-12 VFSL L 0- 0 92-100 7-24 1- 6
SC0116 12-40 SCL CL 0- 0 95-100 18-35 2- 5
SC0116 40-62 SCL CL SC 0- 0 95-100 18-40 2- 7
SC0116 62-79 SL SCL SC 0- 0 95-100 15-45 1- 6
SOI-5 Depth -pH- O.M. Salin Permeab Shnk-Swll
FLO129 0-12 4.5- 6.5 L-6. 0- 0 2.0- 6.0 LOW
tJ FLO129 12-62 4.5- 5.5 - 0- 0 0.6- 2.0 LOW
FLO129 62-85 4.5- 5.5 - 0- 0 0.6- 6.0 LOW
SCO020 0-12 3.6- 6.5 1.-6. 0- 0 6.0- 20 LOW
http://www.statlab.iastate.edu/soils/osd/dat/R/R.AINS.html 10/6/98

Official Series Description - RAINS Series
Page 4 of 4
Li
�j
I�
SCO020 0-12 3.6- 6.5 L-6. 0- 0 2.0- 6.0 LOW
SCO020 0-12 3.6- 5.5 1: 6. 0- 0 0.6- 2.0 LOW
SCO020 12-40 3.6- 5.5 .5-1. 0- 0 0.6- 2.0 LOW
SCO020 40-62 3.6- 5.5 .5-1. 0- 0 0.6- 2.0 LOW
SC0020 62-79 3.6- 5.5 .5-1.0- 0 0.6- 2.0 LOW
SCO102 0-14 4.5- 5.5 L-6. 0- 0 2.0- 6.0 LOW
SCO102 14-36 4.5- 5.5 - 0- 0 0.6- 2.0 LOW
SCO102 36-46 - - - - -
SC0116 0-12 4.5- 6.5 L-6. 0- 0 2.0- 6.0 LOW
SC01160-124.5-6.5 1: 6.0-02.0-6.0LOW
SC0116 12-40 4.5- 5.5 .5-1.0- 0 0.6- 2.0 LOW
SC0116 40-62 4.5- 5.5 .5-1.0- 0 0.6- 2.0 LOW
SC0116 62-79 4.5- 5.5 .5-1.0- 0 0.6- 2.0 LOW
National Cooperativ6-Soil-Sur v-'e'-y
U.S.A.
http://www.statlab.iastate.edu/soils/osd/dat/R/RAINS.html
10/6/98

SC002^v ❑ .. _ . „ - E ? E " A ' .: '• a . E . (? ? D -.AI"S S �T
i
1 �r
VS. _ ^ D' v cc_� _= C: c III ?=_?c-= ''0= = ` rc v^ _/ .
.� ,._ =, ='k E_. . „� _ ,..._.... .. _ . A,,:A_ 'LA:'..:ti A _. 7A7iYE - . iLE. .....,'TA s.=.._ `dE. CA.%
y Y � Y : - T T1 Y_=C ^_-r� - - 'CC' -= r - _ _ r?? C }. V j, ❑71'Z7 C - �5 T -
ir'.. SA"=u. ?.. d__W. H . .c Su., .. A ` :A � 1::.. _.... Z4 . i5.. AY - 0. __ .. '1....... ,.. r _ ....
:'i:°=S '-.v{) ' .== :i i?i. .: --.AY SA,.(DY LOAM A";D T-E :-_D 90 i�;C?ES :c SPAY SA-NDY CLAY LvA'�
M. T
-D= ...... E?IAL _c 58AY SAQ 75 .A ._.F 4.: .;. I\1..::,.. -P� -i_?7E5 _M _'Amv r_"U:AL AIa A.,DE ,Y, R5- : aHE\ ".
D
'DSC C_ air r 7197 -^r=CPTT=C
ANR;;AL AIR =irwT - ,— ! A.")�t1X =.! ElATiCH D?AihA E SLG°E
TcMP`3a. ?E vAYE ?=cCi?iTAT:vy ; (_) r:A53 (PCT)
59-44 !9Q-9a0 ( 4-^^ 40-4E9 I
1DZP =::
lRAC7.!F7;ACT.(PBC_W7
C'='ATERik
LESS ;CLAY
USDA 'FUTURE�X.
iE0
AA5'T.Q :)'.O iN:3-iO:M;
Tr.A4
3" PASSING IEVE V.1
'(PCT)
!(PC7)
'1 4
! 10
( 40
'. 200 !(PCT):
!SM
!A-2 0
) 0
!100
95-100
15-35 `2-'0 .
:L,=L Jc
M,...
)A 4 0
0
0
95- 00
50 .
25-56 . -0
,A
I-12 !L
!CL. ML, CL
!A-6,A-4 O
0
;100
95-1110
c:O"5
55 75 !7-27 .
2-40!SCL,CL
!SC,SC-SM, .,C;
v_ !A-2,A-4,A-6 0
0
ii00
95-100
55-98
30 70 ;13-35;
"t !A-4 A-6 A-7 0
CL-r
r
! 0
!100
99-100
60-'3
36-72 ;'.8 »0;
!A-Z.A-4.A-- ! 0
0
!i00
95-100
60-95
30 60 ;i5 »5!
!L:r: -, ']iAS- .
M iv 2-ii . P-R A-
. AVAILABLE 5^ SA;IyT V
SA?
C:C
CAC i SYPSuM r
!i:a. L...:: ;T:C1.
. EILi
! ATE? CANCi7Y! "`ACT. !
_ 'iMDS'd
'r7r?�) (iM1:31
lib/?+) rou7 '(MMPj3S! "
!(kE/'OOc)(PCT) tors)
-2 15-30 NP-4
..40-..70 6.0 20
! 0.07-0.'0 . 3.6-6.5
(
; 1.4
;
;0 12 ; '. 35 ;hP-10 .
.20-1.60 2.0-6.0
0.10-0.14 ; 3.6-6.5 .
^• " , .
45-.60 0
-0.20
-6Zi
! iS-40 ! 4-ZO ;
..30-..60
2.6-5.5
I
2-5
1
!
-.40-62! 13-45 4-42 .
1.10-1.9-0 1 0. 2 0
0.10 O.i5 3.6 5.5
;
! 2 7
1
!62-79; i5-40 ; 2-18 .
..20-i.60 '. 0.6-2.0
0.10-0.15 3.6-5.5
;
! 1-6
1 I
!EP':!5.?SA iP1 Sa.-(I%' - . E.?CSiCN !xID)D ; iiIQ C,CLK.K.VITY
ER . UELL FACTC.R.5
or71 on.D TIAL � r- ;C. r'iw Itnvr Sr=_ ' rya, RE7-
H2 1-6 V LOW :5! A- 2y 134 ' it^ ' HTS:i
)-12 ! 1-6 LOW ..20!: 0; 5 3 S6
i1 :2 . .-6 LOw !.28;.29' 5 6 48
12-40! .5-. ! LOB .24!.24!
T9! .5-1
' OW ^?' ''
--
—=LODDIMG
-T�d 47E3 "A3' r=M=37ED FAN ' KIDUM
C1-
c. nc �-y;rc uvnonr�nt.
...o=,
_
D=P HM: KT: !zG°:� !Do°T''-'11 DES.°;D�?T. `;!+.AK.:'`.>�SS!:hi
........�
-
TOTAL! c .. ;.RCSt
F 5a ,'C'!
aURATT- x !Mrur_9
rc-) _ _ fi^l! ! (IN):(?N)_(IM)
_ ACTPv
i60
Li

SCOOZO
v = r-: c-t=c a ::^--a
SANiTA?.. A..._.:._„ !A} ui+.a:.,�,,..,,tiATiAL ! _
IEZpq_n
.ASC 1
PEAS
11
1
.:wA28A°l.--:Y,CES5 = `!:S
SA`::T.ARY
LAND=i'1
;:
FAVEL
,
1 ,
SAti: ARY
;;
1 '1
A,a
TL Sun
;
(AREA)
11
1 1
1
D.AIL'd
1;
WATER MkmAG`nE !Ai
COVER -5,R
;;
'."•DDt-RU SEEPAGE
LANrFILL
;
:;
PCtiD
;;
AREA
' 1
MIDING -
1
,
;SEVERE' E55
{;
:SEVERE-•''OTiC 'f.Mw55 ;
IFEMBANKtaciRS
ATION'S
;
;;
DitES AND
,
1
UVEES
;
1
Dry SS
; ;
EXCAVATED
CAVE
;Scit—F&WETNESS
FAK?A3LE !
DOA-mr=
;
i
1
ZTNEFS
::
•c: __ aF5 :?55
°?ALL
!:
_ c.sETE? nzC Tv =A5 :\TAKE , S _. .
— -rvwz iAi
L^CAL
:;
.c?'.AC:
�1�2�5i5L�-
:%CADS AND
AND
1
1
sAT AYE
.

RAms S R?25 5U�J2Q
?QQ SAlD'!
v
CA{- AREAS
RLAYS DS
:
i
+c: oc: rlec: : c.�=1='=-'sc-'dcec
.
+r. cc: Y==
•
cA\'DY
FAT'c
'E-E-==71=cc SANDY i
..
-_:5
P:C'iC ie=i5.
AND
TRAILS
REGIONAL id --P?= ATiQ49
CA?Aen T-v AND YTM .,c PER
.AC?E rr Cw=- AND
CLASS
: CPA-
;G'JTTQ4
PGN
:SJY°EAkS
,OATS
TQSACC
:TAL
:SA-ASRASS
DcTER? KNG
9iL Y
.L:kT
f
;FESCUE
i ' ,
°HAcc
—
t(L°c)
:(Su)
'T--U)
:(BU)
'n 5S)
:tA"M)
t(0-!) r
,A'.L
'Yi%Rti9R.:Mi�R
;'"P
!;%M T?=
:NiFR
'i=.?.:aTR.?
iRF
'�;iPR -cF
'k-RR 'TPP
:HTRR TRR. '
, 'sk' '
1.
450
110 I
1 aQ
i
T
2300
9.0
!'.Q.O
;
CLASS-
9c7cq?':aT;XG
!QRD! "ANAfiE:".E"-'T ??QBLErS ?nTc.y-.AL P30D!UiUi-v
'SYM!ERGS 'M!cn,ra ;ecSCL.:iaiMD7u!PLANT M4a fa.,! TR 5 •crTE;cF.CS: T? —5
�A._.CQ . _ .:X.
cA 7:1' i!L:Tt t„(:%�AS;
TQ PLA%-- ,
t
AL_
10i15Li ":^QDER.I^•D K..55 2i �'JEREiLQ� D PTNE
!94 .:Q •LDBLP.LLY
Pi`cE
I 1 I SNE-F. CR !
190 )? S+ &IM
I
I 0 .ICA4'
)
SYCAYC-E l

w: A _aa =r':-'r __Ac c�c_ __ =rc�r_r-= I- ti.' SPECIES
ca
-ABi7A. - CREN:C
:ANY:: . S
..A, A„
-AB .0 'r ❑rL.
:.:.A: .
DE:c-?;TN:NS
;ERA:': VERASE 3; 2:.5
'LARDQ :CO..47- R!E;zc S
:1�::A\D:S;A'wJa:C'�EN
9�:Xv3DLD
:+c`:LA`:J'.?ANF"
P'AF
S-D Z-GLM.E : -qR.
: nEES :?LAb:7S '
:PLANTS iA7ER
'i:L F iLJ
:a;LDLF 'i iL
;Au_
FAIR :FAIR .PAC-
:GOOD :C-30D
;E410 :C^:JD
.'FA:R '.GOOD
ewe
PLANT
?- r^_n:7pr_c rCCM?OF!O (DRY
= :c_n BY CLASS
?reEWN?Ne PRASE '
M,V,r;! PLANT NA;!: SYM L
t
ALL
!
"NEaND ^..?HUM : ARS?5
9
Cv :AC- KRASS ! CT; AR
:
17
i{
tr Y !M—U-
25
I
iNi7C=F?ASS TAM
)
9
I
1
dRC:6ALLBE`RY ::Lw
9
(
;
(
?O?- -iAL PRODUCTION (LBS./AC. DRY f';):
1
_ FAVORABLEE YEARS
?300
(
: NORMAL YEARS
:LSD
(
:
UNFAVORABLE YEARS
900
:
c00?y,D?Ec
r RA:iNSS 9AS D ON NA?TONAL SOT! r,ANDM, PAR- 603, DULY :9S3.

TOISNOT

Official Series Description - TOISNOT Series Page 1 of 3
LOCATION TOISNOT NC
Established Series
Rev. REH:CMM:DLN
12/97
TOISNOT SERIES
The Toisnot series consists of poorly drained, slowly permeable soils that formed in fluvial or marine
sediments in the upper Coastal Plain. Slopes range from 0 to 2 percent.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Coarse -loamy, siliceous, semiactive, thermic Typic Fragiaquults
TYPICAL PEDON: Toisnot loam --on a nearly level slope under mixed hardwood and pine at an
elevation of about 160 feet. (Colors are for moist soil unless otherwise stated.)
01--1 to 0 inch; partially decayed leaves, moss, and twigs.
A1--0 to 6 inches; very dark gray (I OYR 3/1) loam; weak medium granular structure; very friable;
many medium and coarse roots; very strongly acid; clear wavy boundary. (3 to 8 inches thick)
Eg--6 to 13 inches; gray (1 OYR 6/1) loamy sand; massive; friable (slightly brittle); few medium and
fine roots; about 5 percent of this horizon is Al material; few small bodies of clean sand; very
strongly acid; clear wavy boundary. (5 to 20 inches thick)
Btg/Eg--13 to 28 inches; dark gray (10YR 4/1) sandy loam; about 15 percent of this horizon is gray
(1OYR 611) loamy sand; brittle; weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable; few fine roots;
few small bodies of clean sand; few irregular tongues 3 to 8 inches in diameter and 2 to 5 feet apart;
very strongly acid; clear irregular boundary. (10 to 24 inches thick)
Ex--28 to 45 inches; light gray (1 OYR 7/1) sandy loam; massive; very hard (difficult to cut with
spade) dry or very slightly moist, when adjacent horizons are saturated; common medium distinct
grayish brown (10YR 5/2) and light brownish gray (10YR 6/2) masses of iron accumulation; very
strongly acid; gradual irregular boundary. (10 to 30 inches thick)
Btg--45 to 61 inches; gray (I OYR 6/1) sandy clay loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure;
friable; few fine roots; sandy loam decreases with depth and is brittle; few small bodies of clean
sand; many coarse faint light gray (10YR 7/1) sandy loam iron depletions; very strongly acid;
gradual wavy boundary. (10 to 24 inches thick)
2Cgl-61 to 80 inches; gray (10YR 511, 6/1) sandy clay; massive; firm; few fine roots; common
medium faint light brownish gray (I OYR 6/2) and light gray (I OYR 7/2) iron accumulations and
common fine faint dark gray (1 OYR 4/1) iron depletions; very strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
2Cg2--80 to 90 inches; light gray (10YR 7/1) clay; massive; very firm, plastic; few fine roots; few
fine distinct yellow (1 OYR 7/6) iron accumulations; very strongly acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Robeson County, North Carolina; 2 miles south of St. Pauls; 1-1/8 miles south
of Great Marsh Church; 100 feet east of SR 1759.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Depth to the upper boundary of the fragipan commonly ranges
from 20 to 40 inches but in some areas it ranges from 10 to 45 inches. In wet seasons, the fragipan is
dry to moist, whereas, the adjacent horizons are saturated. Reaction ranges from extremely acid to
strongly acid throughout the profile, unless the surface has been limed.
http://www.statlab.iastate.edu/soils/osd/dat/T/TOISNOT.html 10/6/98

Official Series Description - TOISNOT Series
Page 2 of 3
The Ap or A horizon has hue of 1 OYR, value of 2 to 4, and chroma of 1 or 2, or hue of N, value of 2
or 3. Texture is loam, sandy loam, loamy sand, or silt loam.
The Eg horizon has hue of 1 OYR or 2.5Y, value of 5 to 7, and chroma of 1 or 2, or hue of N, value of
6 or 7. Texture is commonly loamy sand, sandy loam, sand, or silt loam.
The Btg/Eg horizon has hue of 1 OYR, value of 4 to 7, and chroma of 1 or 2. It is sandy loam, fine
sandy loam, or silt loam.
The Ex horizon has hue of 1 OYR, value of 7, and chroma of 1 or 2, and may have white or pale
brown mottles or bodies. Texture is fine sandy loam, sandy loam, loamy fine sand, or loamy sand.
The clay content ranges from 2 to 18 percent and is usually on the lower end of the range. The white
bodies have less clay, whereas, the grayer and browner materials have more clay. The proportion of
brittle material is about 60 percent of the matrix which is brittle or slightly hard. A dry fragment
slakes or fractures when placed in water.
The Btg horizon has hue of 1 OYR value of 4 to 6, and chroma of 1 or 2. Masses of iron
accumulation in shades of brown and yellow range from few to many. In some pedons, the Btg2
horizon is mottled in shades of gray, yellow, and brown. Texture is commonly sandy clay loam, but
ranges to include fine sandy loam, sandy loam, or sandy clay.
The 2Cg horizon is gray or is mottled. Texture is variable including sandy, loamy, or clayey
sediments. This horizon is stratified and includes gravelly layers in some pedons.
COMPETING SERIES: Mashulaville is the only series in the same family. Bibb, Lynchburg,
Myatt, att, P ummer, Rains, and Rutlege series are in related families. Mashulaville soils contain more
silt or more very fine sand in all horizons and more clay in the fragipan. Bibb, Lynchburg, Myatt,
Plummer, Rains, and Rutlege soils lack fragipans. In addition, Lynchburg soils have browner colors.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Toisnot soils are in shallow depressions, around the heads of
drainageways, and on the outer fringe of stream terraces next to the better drained uplands, in the
upper Coastal Plain. They occupy the transition areas between soils with contrasting drainage. On
some landscapes, these soils extend down shallow drainageways for short distances. Slopes are
generally less than 2 percent. The soil formed in moderately coarse textured fluvial or marine
sediments. Near the type location, the mean annual rainfall is 49 inches and mean annual temperature.
is 62 degrees F.
i GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: These include the competing Bibb, Plummer,
Rains, and Rutlege series, and the Dunbar, Goldsboro, Norfolk, Portsmouth, and Wagram series.
Except for Portsmouth soils, all of these soils are on the adjacent higher landscapes and have better
drainage and lack fragipans. Portsmouth soils have umbric epipedons, are fine -loamy, wad lack
fragipans.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Poorly drained; slow to ponded runoff; slow permeability.
USE AND VEGETATION: Most areas are in mixed forests of hardwoods and pine. Native trees
include oak, maple, sweetgum, yellow -poplar, and loblolly pine, with understory plants as sweet bay,
myrtle, gallberry, and smilax. Small acreages have been cleared and used for pasture, com, and
soybeans.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Upper Coastal Plain areas of North Carolina- and possibly South
Carolina and Virginia. The series is inextensive.
MLRA OFFICE RESPONSIBLE: Raleigh, North Carolina
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Robeson County, North Carolina; 1972.
http://www.statlab.iastate.edu/soils/osd/dat/T/TOISNOT.html 10/6/98

Official Series Description - TOISNOT Series
Page 3 of 3
REMARKS: Toisnot soils formerly were included in the Bibb, Plummer, and Rains series and
classified in the Low Humic-Gley great soil group. The brittle layer of this soil will not qualify as a
fragipan, but is placed here due to pragmatic reasons. This layer appears to fit the concept of a
densipan as described by Dr. Smith in SSSA Proceedings, volume 39, page 369-370.
ADDITIONAL DATA: North Carolina State University Soils Department. Laboratory data for two
pedons from Robeson County, North Carolina, from the fragipan horizon.
Bulk
Depth % Sand % Silt % Clay Density
inches gm/cc ;
1. 21-38 67.0 31.0 2.2 2.1
2 30-46 67.4 27.0 5.7 ---
SIR/OSD REPORT:
SOI-5 Soil Name Slope Airtemp FrFr/Seas Precip Elevation
NCO086 TOISNOT 0- 2 60- 65 190-230 45- 52 100- 300
NCO142 TOISNOT 0- 2 60- 65 190-230 45- 52 100- 300
SOI-5 F1oodL F1oodH Watertable Kind Months Bedrock Hardness
NCO086 NONE COMMON 0-1.0 APPARENT DEC -APR 60-60
NCO142 NONE - APPARENT - 60-60
SOI-5 Depth Texture 3-Inch No-10 Clay%' -CEC-
NC0086 0-13 L SIL 0- 0 100-100 5-25 1- 7
NCO086 0-13 LS SL 0- 0 100-100 5-15 1- 5
NCO086 13-28 SL FSL SIL 0- 0 100-100 5-15 1- 3
NCO086 28-45 LS SL 0- 0 100-100 5-15 1- 3
NCO086 45-80 SR S L 0- 0 100-100 15-30 3- 6
NCO142 0-13 L 0- 0 100-100 7-17 1- 7
NCO142 0-13 LS SL 0- 0 100-100 5-15 1- 5
NCO142 13-28 SL FSL 0- 0 100-100 5-15 1- 3
NCO142 28-45 LS SL 0- 0 100-100 7-17 1- 3
NCO142 45-80 SR S L 0- 0 100-100 15-30 3- 6
SOI-5 Depth -pH- O.M. Salin Permeab Shnk-Swll
NCO086 0-13 4.5- 5.5 .5-2. 0- 0 2.0- 6.0 LOW
NCO086 0-13 4.5- 5.5 .5-2. 0- 0 2.0- 6.0 LOW
NCO086 13-28 4.5- 5.5 0.-1. 0- 0 0.2- 0.6 LOW
NCO086 28-45 4.5- 5.5 0.-.5 0- 0 0.06- 0.2 LOW
NCO086 45-80 4.5- 5.5 0.-.5 0- 0 0.06- 0.2 LOW
NCO142 0-13 4.5- 5.5 .5-2. 0- 0 2.0- 6.0 LOW
NCO142 0-13 4.5- 5.5 .5-2. 0- 0 2.0- 6.0 LOW
NCO142 13-28 4.5- 5.5 0.-1. 0- 0 0.2- 0.6 LOW
NCO142 28-45 4.5- 5.5 0.-.5 0- 0 0.06- 0.2 LOW
NCO142 45-80 4.5- 5.5 0.-.5 0- 0 0.06- 0.2 LOW
National Cooperative Soil Survey
U.S.A.
http://www.statlab.iastate.edu/soils/osd/dat/T/TOISNOT.html 10/6/98

iz
cA=+ �cdc_, ._. L;A. ,..._,. A= •0 __ _ .._ On ..A:=A"r'_i-A'%., .At„=aL_CF
:;v '__ Y :)'1_ ..AS .. ]LA:`:. ..+ A '._ %' s c,.?=AC. 'a.A":4 :: vA'V
"- S: b _ " V rcY p:� "�:r-_]^�_ _ _ ] _'/. 4 C - *.C]TL ^- _ - y
w
.-A 3-A. ;A.. oA. :C' . _ to .- LA. ; A . ;ax.. =,A:' 3a+:
A'. _C-.'L' v A .. 45 . 'h.CS :S L .- S?AV SAND '.CAM: -;AT .S =A;'0 pm v..-- - -_ ]J0.9t:Ly
•;'n:• r� '. +w --_ y1l_:: r __ -av�' - ,+. y :' ° i0 . o'.':'-[� c .cc..: - u Q = _-
wA. :-A
,vA. .,,,.. _ _ ..-,. A=- SA:O- tin A ' A
' NOTECA= AD C! TM.A-_ =r,=,r -_
AF w'AL .vi. =?CSi ? : A w? .El =4A?:0^:
T°*?E?A7_?E DAYS ]SEC'2:-+A7:6.k (�J ! ASS t?C-) '.
e'c,Tu' ,=aACT.:FSACT ']E?aT .3F xA ?:AL L-UR :CLAY .
I.M.:;,S'JA';EX%.0 L"-'IciEB AASN'O i:10 ri!3-10i 74" 3 ?A5c
3ic -_rc 40 .
'(?CTI '(]CT) 4 +n 40V 200
L,S :w-r'-,r: :A-4,A-5 0 0 M0 too 07_ - r0-75
.3 1LS, S�,SC S",SC :A-2,A-4 0 0 +i00 i00 5G- 5 40 `✓
B7` :5?,S^='"•rS:,Y' ;A-2,A 0 0 !00 1!1%0 e0- 0 5A 'S_!A
0 MO ?^( Fo_- 20-4P 'S-i5 .
;CL,SIC, C '!LEC-SM :A-4,A-5 . 0 C. i+-00 100
' '7=:L:P,1::0 T AS- ' *O:S7 ELLK cERYEA- AVAi'_AC'.` So SAL:+s:TY 3A'n „ZC 1 CAC03 . S°]cots ,
:Y.11 .:r:i : 0 ?S:i? °:: ^! :tAic CA?ACTS; ZEAC7:.v ;
1ti0l+?:�^S/C".); 't)!E/SOOS'r; ('C';) 1 tFCT)
10-13 , 20-30 4-15 ..30-..50 : 2.0-6.0 : 0,15-0.20 1 4.5-5.5 1
.5 15 ":'-i0 ..50-1.T0 2.0-5.0 0.05-0.14 . 4,5-5.5
.;-25 :R?-10 . ..50-1.70 0.2-0.6 0.10-0..5; 1 4.5-5.5
�3-451 .5- 25 N -7 : 1.50-1.70 : 0.05-0.1 0.0-0.05 1 4.5 5.5 1 1 ;
:45-30: 29-40 1 4-20 . 1.25-1.25 1 0.0E-0.2 0.10-0. S 1 4.5-5.5 : 1
--.I?T=;OFSA?L,.. s? `;(- , S.?OS:h �1(i'!'J . 'A:!!➢ Cup".F,OS:V:T'!
:t:b.):?JATc? ' MILL FACT.+ 'E2OS.: E?@.
nr') :\m 57=--
13 .5-2 LOW ..23'.231 3 . p;ey H•'� .'
'6-13 ..5-2 LOW !.'.0!.10! 3
FOOD:\@
_J'= *A: = TAo: _
CEy.E\TE® ?A\ :
HUROCK ES-]ar_ ''VS:?Oi�4T :
.,E?7fi ':00 :3C.\7uc
:uE:'.-.=AE� SS:OEr"-
-A..DNESS'...-..'_-AL:c(i'?:
-- __e:Ev`y :LRAi:C'!
'"92t =S (=T)
r:yi)!
(:':) 't 'aJ :ti?:1 AC7N.
_ epx-
aAg,-:a• 0-1.0!A??An"E+!-
'-0
:M!
f
I

EAt: -APY ..PAC - °C 'A} ?Ai
R:+AD.
Ala
ASD'uti SAND
• idARE: SE+lE?:-sec ;ES"c " �=�•'Ai._ �{CE55 =i �S
SANTT.ARY ICOWON:SENE?E •eikG,+E-"ESo �I : .
`AD
SA!:°-ARYiERE'=:L'rDi:°c,C=)E iT D
!AREA'
'PDiiR-AdEA :LAIMJEMESS
!�
DAILY
ii
WAT=° MANAS�(C1' (A)
C"Ub=R FSR
,cU RA My ..ED PAN
�ANur: t
KIND
1
'?ttt
RESERNDTR
' i
ARD
EUP.DINe SITE DE ELOPMENT (A)
:SErE.R."CUTBANX5 cauE,AETNE55
'i
'S�iL-PTPSN� A LECC - i
,
a-...ATTDN5
;
:! DT ZS AND
t
LEVEES
I
lSc`i w-PLDC�DTNS,tiETwSS
I;
.5c1�i 51-0N AcFTl:,CL'TaaYKS CAVE
D'Ln ; TNCS
1 f EXCUATE.3
' '"'IT• UT
PENDS
BASEMENTS
t
iaQUT'ER FED
( I
:S lE.=,E ^ DTNS,iE?NES
:RAr:L:PERCS S�:uY, EEN PAN
HE L: �3
;C 3+eiN:P Rr� LOkY rL.PM P •.'DDTs
T:d
DRANASr
• OFASE E=:TS
�
iSL ERt-'L.,J...S,AE-NL..S
°..,DnL..T.•
I
<_ � •E?A�._
- ..
,.S:seT??5^ ;;�T'r =A5' iTA{E
aA3E.5E:c E-i NE55
C EacD 'AN ,:z-kzoo,E-aCDES EAK Y
.-CAL
KiN —1E _ - ase,�=-
.'.GADS .AND
A"D
LAWNS,
CkS:❑=.c- 6L:.....,..
—N me =_ C _ ,� --
:az.+EAST-.,DRisc._ry
�,::
,1c-.ESS
S.RASEL.
'
M =
'4 �AYS

R.M;EA77.a6A!_
7,-
' r.
?AT C
!P:c::c AAEAZ: AD
CAPASIL ry .AND VI.-M - ' ACiE F E?5 AND PAST .°r ESti*) lS)
:ASS-
CAPA- !90YDEAMS
:CORN
?AS?JRE
! !
P-ASE
M1)
MI)
i(ALK)
,�:RR!iRR :kiR.R:ERR.
'ti:?. ;;?R,
'�):�R rRR, ,n:_R :RR
:MiRR
:R?
.MUR. „g';.
;4;RR T.'.R.
:dRADED
aW . 25 I
! 7.0
;
i
,
+0➢➢'_AND SE?AS•w:'Y M
ASS
.-LcC
:0➢"AUArcyrui :?Er_=P-0 ry
E-`tMIMDIC
rxc5
;si c:P='➢! iR S TO of Arr
?SASE
: !RCA'E;L:Mi-
!MMT'Y:r ZARDMMIP T:
:\DX:US! ;
2i 'SLIGHT:M^E=
'M➢DER.i!-ODER,;SEV'FE•Li!& ➢::Y ?TX.
50 :3 '11 i._1V c:?:
!SLASn' ]T.E
80 ':0 :S`AS- P:Wc
Cry -Sri
'20 :6 SUE-F. SUM ,
:

i
1ie7AB-177 .."
' OLAnn
r'T='T:A! _'� -A:; TA? _ fir. .�
- "-T:A Ac
=A5 - -
:A: u
'3 SRASS °' x: D
.-A-Dte 'rS-.v.
_
RG.A's�.S'A:L:6. .' ' J <Oti1�t DV: x� LA J. RA
o_a.SE
--_ =•s:Ty ____
--___ '_Ax7E !
=LAFS : 9Al-R !iiiLDLF :i
:i"J 'Ev",:V
!GJD ?C-JUD
:cpD? END 'Sr, ;JD :SI D
.=AiR
:=Ai? :FA.'-.
:FAI= :FAIR
�ry-0D 'EL'i.D :FA:R :EAi3
?nrck;"A: ':A?IYE e: A IT (`^lM%—N--V (?AX%H AND OR -uRELi ;0%iDe S-:GRY VE= Ai iDE)
^
PLANT
Fcp: --AE Ciep',;.°- y arY rc:C_-) BY CLEO- -:ASc
M*SN oI Ads NOE SYMBOL
!SkEETBAY
!MAVI:
N ?ERRY
!E 'iERiER
SMILAZ !
!
OUi ERM BAYBERRY
!dYCE 1
!
!
!
!
!
j
!
!
IL Fi;L-iA: ?SCDLCT:Oti (LBS./AC. DRY
--
FAVORABLE YEARS
!
'
NORMAL YEARSl
1
!
0;AVNQ E YEARS
GI)?:a7 cc
----
A RAi:\ES SAS Oti
ISE , ?AR? :i, EEC?IOh 4+9.
aL'JC_A':D ?A':: ;fiE
BASED :r`: kA? Id"AL FuR°S7RY
:710il �, Sc .:32"v.
RA?i ,.0
BASED Ti 5._ :nrx;:.4.A"iD'.b"•-?a, :At. :07:.
._ A RA _ E
VE'R:ac. J.3 T—E .XTCRFR A _—, Oa :De ..I- -,1?
AI': u!?LA":A .114 'v .-IE :�: vC.

WAGRAM
Li

LOCATION WAGRAM
NC+AL FL GA SC VA
Established Series
Rev. BJW
6/88
WAGRAM SERIES
The Wagram series consists of very deep, well drained, moderately
permeable soils that formed in loamy marine sediments on Coastal Plain
uplands. Slopes range from 0 to 15 percent. Near the type location,
mean annual precipitation is 49 inches and the mean annual temperature
is about 62 degrees F.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Loamy, siliceous, thermic Arenic Kandiudults
TYPICAL PEDON: Wagram loamy sand --cultivated field. (Colors are for
moist soils unless otherwise stated.)
Ap--O to 8 inches;, grayish brown (10YR 5/2) loamy sand; single grained;
very friable; medium acid; abrupt smooth boundary. (6 to 10 inches
thick)
E--8 to 24 inches; pale brown (10YR 6/3) loamy sand; single grained;
loose; few thin horizontal bands of sandy loam; strongly acid; gradual
wavy boundary. (14 to 30 inches thick)
Bt1--24 to 27 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) sandy loam; few fine
grayish brown mottles; weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable;
some penetration of E material locally in root channels; local areas
that are brittle; strongly acid; clear wavy boundary. (0 to 6 inches
thick)
Bt2--27 to 38 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/8) sandy clay loam; weak
medium subangular blocky structure; friable, slightly sticky; few faint
clay films in pores and on 'faces of peds; strongly acid; gradual wavy
boundary.
Bt3--38 to 52 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/8) sandy clay loam; common
medium distinct yellowish red (5YR 5/8) mottles; weak medium and coarse
subangular blocky structure; friable, slightly sticky; few faint clay
films on faces of peds; common clean grains of coarse sand; strongly
acid; gradual wavy boundary. I
Bt4--52 to 75 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) sandy clay loam; few
medium distinct yellowish red (5YR 5/8) mottles and few medium faint
pale brown (10YR 6/3) mottles; weak, medium and coarse subangular blocky
structure; friable; strongly acid; gradual irregular boundary. (Combined
thickness of the Bt horizon is 21 to more than 60 inches)
BC--75 to 82 inches; mottled yellowish.brown (10YR 5/6) and gray (10YR
6/1) sandy loam; massive; few lenses and pockets of sandy clay loam
material; some gray areas contain very coarse sand grains; very strongly
acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Scotland County, North Carolina; 4.2 miles north of
Laurinburg on U.S. 501, 0.2 mile north of Five -Points and 75-feet west
of highway.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Solum thickness is more than 60 inches. Soil

PAGE 02
is very strongly acid to moderately acid throughout, unless it is limed.
The A or Ap horizon has hue of 10YR, 2.5Y, or it is neutral, value of 4
to 6, and chroma of 0 to 4. It is loamy sand, loamy fine sand, fine
sand, or sand.
The E horizon has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 5 to 7, and chroma of 2
to 4. It is loamy sand, loamy fine sand, sand, or fine sand.
The Bt horizon has hue of 7.5YR to 2.5Y, value of 5 or 6, and chroma of
4 to 8. The texture is mainly sandy clay loam but ranges to sandy loam.
Distinct mottles of red, brown, or yellow are common in the lower Bt
horizon. Mottles in chroma of two or less are 60 inches or more below
the surface. Some pedons contain up to 5 percent plinthite, by volume,
in the lower part of the Bt horizon.
The BC horizon has hue of 7.5YR to 2.5Y, value of 5 to 7 and chroma 1 to
8 or it is mottled. It is loamy soil material.
COMPETING SERIES: The Lucy series is the only other known series in the
same family. Similar series are Ailey, Autryville, Blaney, Blanton,
Bonneau, Boykin, Briley, Candor, Fuquay, Kenansville, Letney, Lowndes,
Norfolk, Ocilla, Pocalla, Rosalie, Trep and Wicksburg. Ailey and Blaney
soils have some brittleness in some part of the Bt horizon. Autryville,
Candor, Lowndes and Pocalla soils have a bisequal profile. Bonneau and
Ocilla soils have mottles associated with wetness within 60 inches of
the soil surface. Boykin, Briley, Letney and Rosalie soils do not have
an even distribution of rainfall during the growing season and the base
saturation is mainly 25 to 35 percent. Blanton soils have sandy A
ii horizons more than 40 inches thick. Fuquay soils have more than 5
percent, by volume, plinthite in the Bt horizon within 60 inches of the
surface. Kenansville soils have thinner Bt horizons. Lucy soils have
r Bt horizon in hues redder than 7.5YR. Norfolk soils have sandy surface
! layers less than 20 inches thick. Trep soils have clayey lower Bt
horizons. Wicksburg soils are clayey in the control section.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Wagram soils occur on broad nearly level to gently
_, sloping ridges and sloping to strongly sloping sideslopes in the upper
Coastal Plain upland. The soils formed in loamy marine sediments.
Slopes are dominantly between 0 to 10 percent but range to 15 percent.
Wagram soils are on the high parts and dry edges of the landscape.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: In addition to the competing Blanton,
Lucy, Norfolk, Ocilla, and Pocallo series these are the Goldsboro,
�- Lynchburg, Rains, and Troup series. Goldsboro, Lynchburg, and Rains
soils have thinner A horizons and are more poorly drained. Troup soils
have sandy A horizons more than 40 inches thick.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Well drained; slow runoff; medium internal
drainage; moderately permeable.
USE AND VEGETATION: Most areas are cleared and used for growing
tobacco, cotton, corn, and small grains. Originally forested with mixed
hardwood and pine, including loblolly and longleaf pine, white oak, red
oak, turkey oak, and post oak; hickory, holly, and dogwood.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain. The series is

PAGE 03
of large extent.
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Scotland County, North Carolina; 1965.
REMARKS: This revision recognizes the low activity clay properties of
this soil as defined in the Low Activity Clay Amendment to Soil
Taxonomy, August 1986.
This series includes soils previously classified as thick surface phases
of the Norfolk series and some previously classified as moderately
shallow phases of the Lakeland series.
Diagnostic horizons and feature recognized in this pedon are:
Ochric epipedon--the zone from the surface to a depth of 24 inches.
Arenic features --the zone from the surface to a depth of 24 inches.
Kandic horizon --The zone between 24 and 75 inches has low activity clay
in more than 50 percent of the upper 40 inches of the horizon.
Argillic horizon --the zone between 24 and 75 inches.
National Cooperative Soil Survey
U.S.A.
�l

1042 SOIL I NTERPRETAT I ONS RECORD WAGRAM SERIES
IA(S): 133A, 153A .
RAG, 12-90
ANLNIC KANDIUDULTS, LOAMY, SILICEOUS, THERMIC
:SE ARE DEEP, WELL DRAINED SOILS ON NEARLY LEVEL TO STRONGLY SLOPING UPLAND RIDGES OF THE COASTAL PLAIN. THEY HAVE
GRAYISH BROWN AND PALE BROWN LOAMY SAND A HORIZONS, 20 TO 40 INCHES THICK, AND FRIABLE YELLOWISH BROWN SANDY CLAY LOAM
1SOILS. THEY FORMED IN COASTAL PLAIN SEDIMENTS. SLOPES RANGE FROM 0 TO 15 PERCENT.
LANDSCAPE ANO.CLIMATE PROPERTIES I
ANNUAL AIR I FROST FREE I ANNUAL I ELEVATION I DRAINAGE I SLOPE I
TEMPERATURE I DAYS I PRECIPITATION I (FT) I CLASS I (PCT) 1
I I I I W I O-15 I
ESTIMATED SOIL PROPERTIES (A)
',PTHI I I IFRACT.IFRACT.IPERCENT OF MATERIAL LESS ICLAY I
N.)I USDA TEXTURE I UNIFIED I AASHTO I>10 INI3-IGINI THAN 3" PASSING SIEVE NO.1 I
I I I I ((PCT) I(PCT) 1 4 1 10 1 40 1 200 1(PCT)I
- 24 ILS,LFS ISM,SP-SM IA-2,A-3 1 0 1 0 1100 98-100 50-85 8-35 12-10 1
44 IFS,S ISP-SM,SM IA-1,A-2,A-3 1 0 1 0 I95-100 90-100 45-80 5-15 11-7 1
1.4-75ISCL,SL ISC IA-2,A-4,A-6,A-7 1 0 1 0 1100 98-100 60-95 31-49 I10-35I
IDEPTHILIQUID IPLAS- I MOIST BULK I PERMEA- I AVAILABLE I SOIL I SALINITY I SAR I CEC I CAC03 I GYPSUM I
N.)I LIMIT ITICITYI DENSITY I BILITY (WATER CAPACITY( REACTION I I I I I I
I (INDEX I (G/CM3) I (IN/HR) I (IN/IN) I (PH) I(MMHOS/CM)1 I(ME/100G)1 (PCT) I (PCT) 1
10-24 1 I NP 1 1.60-1.75 1 6.0-20 1 0.05-0.08 1 4.5-6.0 I I 1. 1 1 1
14 1 I NP 1 1.60-1.75 1 6.0-20 1 0.03-0.07 1 4.5-6.0 I I I 1 1 1
751 21-41 18-25 1 1.35-1.60 1 0.6-2.0 1 0.12-0.16 14.5-6.0 I I I 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I I I I I
•PTHIORGANICI SHRINK- I EROSION IWIND I WIND I CORROSIVITY I
I(IN.)IMATTER I SWELL I FACTORS IEROD.I EROD. I I
;'_i I (PCT) (POTENTIAL( K I Kfl T IGROUPI INDEX I STEEL ICONCRETEI
1 �24 I .5-2 I LOW 1.151.151 5 I 2 I 134 I LOW I HIGH I
fD 24 I.5-2 I LOW 1.101.101 5 I 1 I 220 1
!14-75I0-.5 I LOW 1.201.201 I 1 I
FLOODING I HIGH WATER TABLE I CEMENTED PAN I BEDROCK (SUBSIDENCE IHYDIPOTENT'LI
DEPTH I KIND IMONTHS IDEPTHIHARONESSIDEPTH IHARONESSIINIT.ITOTALIGRPI FROST I
i✓

'SRAM SERIES
NCO042
SANITARY FACILITIES (B) CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL (B)
I0-8%:MODERATE-PERCS SLOWLY II (GOOD I
TIC TANK I8-15%:MODERATE-PERCS SLOWLY,SLOPE II I I
ABSORPTION I II ROADFILL I I
FIELDS I II I I
I II I I
I0-1%:SEVERE-SEEPAGE II (IMPROBABLE -EXCESS FINES I
SEWAGE I1-15%:SEVERE-SEEPAGE,SLOPE II I I
LAGOON I II SAND
AREAS
I0-8%:SLIGHT II (IMPROBABLE -EXCESS FINES I
SANITARY 18-15%:MODERATE-SLOPE II I I
LANDFILL I II GRAVEL I I
(TRENCH) I II I I
I II I I
ISEVERE-SEEPAGE II I0-8%LS,LFS:FAIR-T00 SANDY I
SANITARY I II I8-15%LS,LFS:FAIR-TOO SANDY,SLOPE I
LANDFILL I II TOPSOIL IS,FS:POOR-TOO SANDY I
(AREA) I II I I
10-8%:6000
II
DAILY
18-15%:FAIR-SLOPE
II
WATER MANAGEMENT (8)
I COVER FOR
I
II
I0-8%:SEVERE-SEEPAGE I
• LANDFILL
I
II POND
18-15%:SEVERE-SEEPAGE,SLOPE I
I
II RESERVOIR
I I
II AREA
I I
BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT (B)
II
I 1
ISEVERE-CUTBANKS CAVE
II
ISLIGHT I
SHALLOW
I
IIEMBANKMENTS
I I
(EXCAVATIONS
I
11 DIKES AND
I I
I
I
II LEVEES
I I
L
I
I I
I I
I0-8%:SLIGHT
II
ISEVERE-NO WATER I
C DWELLINGS
18-15%:MODERATE-SLOPE
II EXCAVATED
I I
j WITHOUT
1
II PONDS
I I
•�IAASEMENTS
_
I
((AQUIFER FED
I I
I0-8%:SLIGHT 1'I IDEEP TO WATER I
},DWELLINGS I8-15%:MODERATE-SLOPE II I I
WITH I II DRAINAGE I
;BASEMENTS I II I I
I II I I
I I0-4%:SLIGHT II I0-3%:DROUGHTY,FAST INTAKE,SOIL BLOWING I
�- SMALL I4-8%:MODERATE-SLOPE II 13-15%:SLOPE,DROUGHTY,FAST INTAKE I
COMMERCIAL I8-15%:SEVERE-SLOPE II IRRIGATION I I
�,-1BUILDINGS I II 1
10-8%:SLIGHT II IO-8%:SOIL BLOWING
_ LOCAL 18-15%:MODERATE-SLOPE II TERRACES I8-15%:SLOPE,SOIL BLOWING
ROADS AND I II AND I
STREETS I 11 DIVERSIONS I
'.AWNS, 10-8%LS,LFS,FS:MOOERATE-DROUGHTY II IO-8%:DROUGHTY,ROOTING DEPTH
..,DSCAPING I8-15%LS,LFS,FS:MODERATE-DROUGHTY,SLOPE II GRASSED I8-15%:SLOPE,DROUGHTY,ROOTING DEPTH
AND GOLF I0-8%S:MODERATE-DROUGHTY,TOO SANDY - II WATERWAYS I
FAIRWAYS I8-15%S:MODERATE-DROUGHTY,SLOPE,TOO SANDY 11 I

GRAM SERIES
NCO042
RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (B)
10-8%LS,LFS:MODERATE-TOO SANDY II 10-2%LS,LFS:MODERATE-TOO SANDY I
18-15%LS,LFS:MODERATE-SLOPE,TOO SANDY 11 12-6%LS,LFS:MODERATE-SLOPE,TOO SANDY 1
CAMP AREAS IS,FS:SEVERE-TOO SANDY IIPLAYGROUNDS I6-15%LS,LFS:SEVERE-SLOPE 1
I II 10-6%S,FS:SEVERE-TOO SANDY 1
I II 16-15%S,FS:SEVERE-SLOPE,TOb SANDY 1
10-8%LS,LFS:MOOERATE-TOO SANDY 11 ILS,LFS:MODERATE-TOO SANDY I
I8-15%LS,LFS:MODERATE-SLOPE,T00 SANDY 11 ' PATHS IS,FS:SEVERE-TOO SANDY I
'ICNIC AREASIS,FS:SEVERE-TOO SANDY 11 AND I I
I II TRAILS I I
REGIONAL INTERPRETATIONS
I I
I I I
-I I
CAPABILITY AND YIELDS PER ACRE OF CROPS AND PASTURE (HIGH LEVEL MANAGEMENT)
CLASS- I CAPA- (COTTON ICORN (TOBACCO (SOYBEANS (PEANUTS (WHEAT (PASTURE I
DETERMINING I BILITY (LINTI I I I I I I
PHASE I I(LBS) I(BU) 1(LBS) I(BU) I(LBS) I(BU) 1(AUM) I
INIRRIIRR.INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. INIRR IIRR. I
-6% 1 2S
-10% 13S
110-15% 14S
1 550 1
1 500 I
I I
75
70
12400
12100
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
25
20
40
30
8.5
7.5
6.5
i` CLASS- IORDI MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS I POTENTIAL PRODUCTIVITY I I
DETERMINING ISYMIEROS'NIEQUIP.ISEEDL.IWINDTHIPLANT I COMMON TREES ISITEIPROD.1 TREES TO PLANT I
PHASE I IHAZARDILIMIT IMORT'YIHAZARDICOMPETI IINDXICLASI I
_(ALL 18S ISLIGHTIMODER.IMODER.ISLIGHTIMODER.ILOBLOLLY PINE 181 18 ILOBLOLLY PINE I
I I I I I I (LONGLEAF PINE 172 16 ILONGLEAF PINE I
I I I I I I (SLASH PINE 180 110 1 1
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
C.i

GRAM SERIES
NCO042
LASS_-DETERMIN'G PHASE[ SPECIES IHTI SPECIES IHTI SPECIES IHTI SPECIES IHTI
I NONE I I I I I I I I
I II II II II
I II II II II
I II II II II
_ WILDLIFE HABITAT SUITABILITY (0)
CLASS- I POTENTIAL FOR HABITAT ELEMENTS I POTENTIAL AS HABITAT FOR: I
I DETERMINING IGRAIN &IGRASS &I WILD IHARDWO ICONIFERISHRUBS IWETLANDISHALLOWIOPENLD IWOODLD IWETLANDIRANGELDI
PHASE I SEED (LEGUME I HERB. I TREES (PLANTS I IPLANTS I WATER IWILDLF IWILDLF IWILDLF IWILDLF 1
6X IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD I IPOOR IV. POORIGOOD IGOOD IV. POOR[ 1
16-15% IFAIR IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD IGOOD I IV. POORIV. POORIGOOD (GOOD IV. POORI I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
POTENTIAL NATIVE PLANT COMMUNITY (RANGELAND OR FOREST UNDERSTORY VEGETATION)
,- I PLANT I PERCENTAGE COMPOSTION (DRY WEIGHT) BY CLASS DETERMINING PHASE I
COMMON PLANT NAME I SYMBOL I I I I I 1
I rev cou, I I `- I I I I
MERICAN HOLLY IILOP I I
IFLOWERING DOGWOOD ICOFL2 I I I I I I
"ERSIMMON IDIVI5 1 1 I I I I
REENBRIER ISMILA2 1
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I
II I I I I I I I
POTENTIAL PRODUCTION (LBS./AC. DRY WT): I I
FAVORABLE YEARS
NORMAL YEARS I I I 1 I 1
FOOTNOTES .
j J ESTIMATES OF ENGINEERING PROPERTIES BASED ON 1 PEDON FROM ROBESON COUNTY, N.C.
B RATINGS BASED ON NSH, PART 603, 7-83.
WOODLAND RATINGS BASED ON NATIONAL FORESTRY MANUAL, 9-80.
I WILDLIFE RATINGS BASED ON SOILS MEMORANDUM-74, JAN. 1972
-*THIS IS A RATING OVERRIDE. SEE THE INTERPRETATION OVERRIDE FILE FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THIS OVERRIDE.
J

J
WAKULLA

LOCATION WAKULLA
NC+FL SC VA
Established Series
Rev. REH:AG:HS
11/92
WAKULLA SERIES
The Wakulla series consists of somewhat excessively drained, rapidly
permeable soils that formed in sandy Coastal Plain sediments on uplands
and stream terraces. Near the type location, mean annual air
temperature is 62 degrees F. and mean annual precipitation is 49 inches.
Slopes range from 0 to 15 percent.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Sandy, siliceous, thermic Psammentic Hapludults
TYPICAL PEDON: Wakulla sand --on a 3 percent slope in cultivated field
at an elevation of 170 feet. (Colors are for moist soil unless
otherwise stated.)
Ap--O to 7 inches; dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) sand; single
grained; loose; few medium and fine roots; moderately acid; abrupt wavy
boundary. (3 to 10 inches thick)
E--7 to 24 inches; light yellowish brown (10YR 6/4) sand; single
grained; loose; few fine roots; strongly acid; clear wavy boundary. (10
to 25 inches thick)
Bt--24 to 42 inches; strong brown (7.5YR 5/8) loamy,sand; weak fine
granular structure; very friable; few fine roots; grains of sand bridged
with clay; strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary. (6 to 30 inches thick)
C1--42 to 56 inches; yellowish brown (10YR 5/8) sand; single
grained; loose; very strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
C2--56 to 83 inches; yellow (10YR 7/6)' sand; single grained; loose;
about half of the sand grains are uncoated; very strongly acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Robeson County, North Carolina; 2 1/4 miles west of St.
Pauls; 1 1/2 miles west of Interstate 95 on SR 1006; 3/8 mile north.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Thickness of the solum ranges from 28 to 60
inches but is commonly 38 to 48 inches. Reaction ranges from very
strongly acid to moderately acid unless limed.
The A or Ap horizons have hue of 10YR, value of 4 or 5, and chroma of 2
i
to 4. They are sand, loamy sand, fine sand, or loamy fine sand.
Li The E horizon has hue of 10YR or 2.5YR, value of 4 to 7, and chroma of 4
to 8. It has the same texture range as the A horizon.
The Bt horizon has hue of 5YR to 10YR, value of 4 to 6, and chroma of 6
to 8. Texture is loamy sand or loamy fine sand with a silt plus clay
content of 10 to 20 percent.
The C horizons have hue of 7.5YR to 10YR, value of 5 to 7, and chroma of
1 to 8. The C horizon is sand, fine sand, or coarse sand.
COMPETING SERIES: There are no other known series in this family.
Alaga, Blanton, Buncombe, Eustis, Galestown, Kenansville, Lakeland,

PAGE 02
Molena, Tarboro, and Troup series are in closely related families.
Alaga, Buncombe, and Lakeland soils lack argillic horizons. In
addition, Lakeland soils contain 5 to 10 percent clay plus silt in the
10- to 40-inch control section and Buncombe soils have mixed mineralogy.
Blanton and Troup soils have sandy loam or sandy clay loam Bt horizons
40 to 80 inches below the surface. Eustis soils have argillic horizons
that extend to depths of 60 inches or more. Galestown soils have
average annual soil temperature of less than 59 degrees F. Kenansville
soils have sandy loam Bt horizons. Molena and Tarboro soils have mixed
mineralogy.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Wakulla soils are nearly level to strongly sloping
and are on broad landscapes of the Coastal Plain uplands and stream
terraces. Slope is generally 0 to 6 percent but may ranges to 15
percent. The soil formed in sandy marine, aeolian, or fluvial Coastal
Plain sediments. Average annual precipitation is 49 inches and mean
annual air temperature 62 degrees F. near the type location.
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: In addition to the competing Alaga,
Eustis, Kenansville, Lakeland, and Troup series, these are Kalmia,
Norfolk, Orangeburg, Rains, and Wagram series. All of these soils are
on lower positions on the landscape and have finer textured Bt horizons.
In addition, Wagram soils.have loamy argillic.horizons and Rains soils
are poorly drained.
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY: Somewhat excessively drained; slow runoff;
rapid permeability.
USE AND VEGETATION: About one half of the acreage of Wakulla soils is
used for cultivated crops and pasture. Corn, peanuts, peas, soybeans,
tobacco, watermelons, and coastal bermudagrass are common crops. Native
forests are principally loblolly pine, longleaf pine, and hardwoods. The
hardwoods are mainly turkey, bluejack, white, post, and blackjack oaks
with a few hickories, blackgum, and dogwood.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: The Atlantic Coastal Plain of North and South
Carolina and possibly Virginia. The series is of moderate extent.
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Robeson County, North Carolina; 1972.
REMARKS: Wakulla soils were formerly included in the Alaga series or
the Eustis series, but these soils do not have argillic horizons.
Diagnostic horizons and features recognized in this pedon are:
Ochric epipedon - the zone'from the surface to'a depth of 24 inches (Ap
and E horizons)
Argillic horizon - the zone from a depth of 24 inches to 42 inches (Bt
horizon)
ADDITIONAL DATA: North Carolina State University Soils Department.
Horizon Depth % Sand % Silt % Clay
E 7-24" 91.5 5.5 3.0 Bt 24-42" 85.9
5.1 9.0 C1 42-56" 91.3 2.9 5.7

PAGE 03
MLRA(S): 133A, 153A, 137, 153B SIR: NCO068
National Cooperative Soil Survey
U.S.A.

"" R. Si: .--A, _5°A, 7, ":'°
-L Y' . C=^'-` r..XC:Z-C 4A_a! -•^. -:=!;O'tL .:a - `/(w___J' Y ''ti:• C M-2 e.n =Ar
-
ERRACES _= -E :tOAS AL' Ai':. .:d p P===::?-A-:'? xr'=:__, : o =A E JYE' :S DAR{ C3A ie- x h SA`:D ASCv? . ;s.Y=C
?C. - y:: iP, 'G- '!�:'� .:A.0 u<}Y°.. .'l - 7A: _- `L'{ -- v
..,, . _ ,.,,.. ,.... aCE :_A. _ _. SAAe',..... �.:._.. � SJ�aS iL .v A 9E?-: := 4� .';G �S 70
.,.
-='..Yr.' xr __ `!'NL `a_:S - DF _ is cc y= -cam ?(2 6 .n VC: • n =`v -n 8 n. oA . --- M A ' A 3.•. C - ._L�.. :c i.:. il'x :,A.v.,
A.'•D .:...'s.V C }+� ] E K =D in":G..
PAINE^_ 5�1E,
-C-�A7jr' DAvC~=rEC'?i"A"iC:ti
E??... FRAC .;FPAC- ?ERCctii u= "A;-,.TAL'� ;C AY .
dSDA 'EX?.?E ; U`;:?.E.n AAS;?0 -M 'W-'.Ui",' �-AN DACCa,S C!=yr yn
'(Crr) ,(PCT) a ,n 40 ��:00.,�Pr-)1
:S"•, 2 Y ;A-2 0 0 ±UU ±oo 65-80 i0-i5 : 23
Cp c`n_S. iA-' 0 0 ±00 ±00 55-90 4-:0 15-±2 ,
;24-42:LS,L=3,LCG6 ;S:!,'S c :A-2 0 0 ; 00 i0U 53 -.0-75 : 1-?
'A-2,A-9 0 0 '±OU 100 50-70 4-'_5 3 ,
;PLAS- p.CiSi Dt :f ?ER*EA- VOILASOiL '. SAL. .. SA.R 1 C`C ;CAL::? 1 SI
Ii .I:.i"i- -iCi"!: DF�Q--' BILi 1 :'LATE' CPACi7!; REAC —&k; . ;
1i DEX 1 tGC.ks) !i4! R) (iti/i) (P-) ;(kMuOS/Cr)' ;iF !±OOS)1 (PC?) (PC-) 1
I0-24 NP ±.45-±.60 6.0-ZU 0.05-0.!0 4.5-5.01 !
10 ! ..a5-±,60 1 A.0-20 0.0-0.05 4.5-M 1
?. NP I ..45-1.4 5.E20 0.05-0.10 4.5-E.0 ! !
42-501 V 1 ..45-..50 1 5.0-20 9.0 0.05 4.5-5.0
.sir?-�'C Ep,LrC1 °=Ri:'dK- ER'."1.5 -. !A' ND : ? D G^R r..SiVT.-Y
f HIU:MA' a SWELL FAC?5?O ROD., ERB.
(Pr-) 'Cn;tll.. g ' r: Vr S;:lu i1E !CCNC:P^=
-24 ..5-± LC'd ,.iOi.±OI 5 . 114 LO'A� Hir
Zz0 1
i
. LOOD:+E — f_ IyA •,=� a=. PAN ^r -O:'f
.........c DE°c-'A3D';ESS'Dr'r_ -ARD':S:iC =RCi.°?
-^ry -A-i:ry •r�tit; =c (:-)^ ' ; lre,): (i".') :(i4'. '.iiti) AC-71-w `

SA),"A?a °ACi' - (31 MATEaIA: !61
SEVERE O'J.R =IL -1 S'nODW
`ACMN - SAND
AnE.AS
' �1c T-S ?ASE
SAND!
EANITARY
iA'tDFiiL
:: SRAV�
l
iSEV --SEE?Abe
:
:0 S'l.:S, FS:FA_-"TOO SANDY
SA�i'ARY
. •
:?,-?08' S,�°S:FaiR•?G'.'Sa?�D`!,S Crc
LANDFILL
TOPSOIL
'c ❑c �remCOR -u0 SANDY 3
(AREA)
DAILY
NAtaR MNACE?EN (B)
COVER `
LAk!Dr.LL
(
POIND
:S-i0%:S:Vc'S-S:=?A c,a-3�l=E i
'
:: RESERVOIR
:
f AREA
EUILDTNs cT D=LOPS 4? (E)
!
:SEVERE-C 'EA,103 CAVE
:1
:SEVERE-SEEFACE,?TRINIG
.A -TONS
(; DIKES AND
!
:1 LEVEES
1
:
l0-EY.:SL C'
I:
:S VERB DO 0TER
_! UELLik6S
:E-107.:YODERATE-SU:?E
MAV.AiED
PONDS
i
):
:DEEP TO 47-2.
D'A°"'_i36S
:8-1M% ODD FAT E-S-CPE
DRAINAGE
3AE IEN;9
'
:0 4%:5 Ir T
_',fDROUGT7v,. AST iN-A!G,SOT! L ELON'NS
S"ALA
:; v.::i ODEiAT 5 . C
:J%:SLO'E,Dni TY =ACT Il1TAt_
COxnCiAi
' :C::SERE;: O?E
" -RRTS T!ON
KIT O INS
_CCAS
:•]':'v%:(AvDEsA C Dom.. _
:: .ZRACES
L,C.-:':::: SLJJC,-'w' SAa!nv,5._ .,.. A :b
ROADS AND
AND
if
'. 4'
.'_ ,! C _ __ •GDC? '.]ice:: �--Y
____
.f_��1�!tail�b•1 .^J
c: ,to=
SRASE '
_U:•;.c. `�?c . •:::.c_T�i
LA ..._A..
.,:. -I l.. ;:-,F=-O='icGTv
I�

u
iiAti�L0.ac?IEa
F a=: 5F°C'=5 qr ccr to c5 cr• ccmrcc
NC0055
CLASS
'"''ir:A =C3=ADT'AT =LE*EN
S
FL'=`NTIA' AS
-A5ITA? =L�
Dc.ERM:NI;'s5
!SRAi?i
'SRASS
3! ':a1-3 :4ARD'.D !�?i ,?:5'i.
:S !'XFLAP:9:S:A:LLs!
ORE S:D
Nam,, l)
!x ET kvSUP
:p-Ar
! !rJINTS ! •kA c�
!'IAII: F
!wi;�;�F
!W-,; - !ei 9tF
;A
!FO:1R
!POOR
FAi{ ;ar,,;IR iFCGR
:V. ?OO.?!V. ?IOR!KOR
:F%OR
!V. PUM!
CAMN ?LANT NAME
!FOk-RlNS C�5'x OD
S:liRiu'_wL
a
d
! 5Yd!BOL
I
a
PO:am. AL FRODUCTiON (!—'S./AC. DRY V):
FAVORABLE YEARS ! ! ! I
N RMAL YEARS I ! t
UNFAVORABLE YEARS !
F;i j
_ .A RA'•ikES BAS D 'ON i FEDON, CUMIP.:^ AND co., N.C.
-RATINSS BASED ON NS-+ SEU-N b03+ T 93.
CvDLA?dD WIN ES BASED ON \A?iO>1AL Ft'•,";EST?Y MANUAL, 5:?.:?30.
D �I DUiF=AT:N59 BASED I'] c S �Et+CRANOc3!-T4, JAN.:9?Z.
EX SSIVE PER:*.EABi OkY CAUSE -OUND AAT'Li
i5 A ?ATI S COVE -RIDE. SEE THE NT FF?EiATiD1i O'd ?RIDE FILE FIR V E;i?LA:4ATION CF "-,IS OVE??TDE.
9
I

:� ;;� � .:>�-A?=__..:' SAS.➢Y
�: �D--:': � � �:�" ='a-_= :: SAS➢Y
=5.- _ 'A :'
SAs C, . -0 -..A-= F_,:CO SA DY
r+.n
A'= ::, =5,v a..E•r_r__.. A�:➢°
V
.,o
.
.. .''!-i%c c_ nc.-tip-_= i:R "aAi;➢Y
SA`nV
':I C ; Mn•Cc ATE- .0 c:u➢Y-
.,,-i.%L3,�rii: SA?!gy .. ?A--t" S, FS,'V;."SEYE?E- QO SAND.
A:=AS S,F3,C'S.czd= SA S''
AND
7RAiLS
,r_evnvAL :Lsc�?�Acirsc
,
?Aar;rnNY'n r.
vV?Av
rrcCA
r^"A"A ? )
CLASS- ; CA?a- QRN
KYnA45 .TOBACM :PASTRE FASS
➢`•EdM:'ar..NS 3i_.!
.HAY
i
PiASE (BUZZ)
:IBI;) :(; S) :(A.t.�) (7tNS)
,,:T 'raa ;yr o rq
N_ y4:P? I? rao
pcd?
nc?^
oo ;
,
,
;
MOLD! AND SUTrA3iLi7Y (Cl
CLASS ,ORD! MANAEPEEV cRG3' =<c 09FNTiAL ?RMCMI-1v
_
:!QJ.
'Y;�C'S'PE
INL7kCERZ--
-.
LL➢E7RM
.NTM
-ki
NT
,
°HACO 'HA.ZARD!L m*,T
;r,C:�7:Y'-AAA;➢;w•M?=T' id➢X'CLAS;
ILL
17S ;SLiG';n0➢ER.:MC'➢ER. a- iC:.TMi&-IT:LUBLCLLY .'..'iE :73 :7 !LO°BLULLY
RINE
;
!
: :La%.e-- F ?ikE !TO :6 !LO.NELEAF
FINE
! :5- 4iLEAF PT-E ;59 ;3 ;
, ' :BLAC'/'A„'< OAK
;
'a.27 OA{
,
_.tea,