NC0020231_Historical_2009-2012

Regio Inspectors' Checklist for F
Parameters
Facility Name: a".kv crAr c r
Regional Plant inspector: GlG r�ijv
NPDES #: IV COW 1-0
Re Tonal In ector Contact #:? 9 7 / -iZue)
Field Lab Certification M 3
Re ion: /e,
Lab Contact: s /6
Date: I ali zoi-L
r
I. Check the parameter(s) performed at this site for reporting purpos s.
❑ Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) emperature (TEMP) pecific Conductivity (SC)
pH issolved Oxygen (DO) Settleable Residue (SETT)
H. General Laboratory note any exceptions in section XI
Are instruments, meters robes, photometric cells etc. maintained in good condition? s Lj No
Are standards, reagents and consumables used within manufacturer expiration dates? Yes No
RC gel standard is exempt.]
Are the following items documented where applicable :
Item
TRC
pH
TEMP
DO
Sc
SETT
Date of sample collection*
Time of sample collection"
Sample collector's initials or signature
Date of sample analysis*
Time of sample analysis*
Analyst initials or signature
Sample location
'Date and time of sample collection and analysis may be the same for in situ6r on -site meafsurements. ' e '
III. Total Residual Chlorine
Total Residual Chlorine meter make and model:
Is a check standard analyzed each day of use? Circle one: gel or liquid standard
❑ Yes
No
What is the assigned/observed value of the daily check standard?
Is a 5-point calibration verificationperformed? Note date of last verification:
❑ Yes
❑ No
Alternatively, does the lab construct a linear regression, using 5 standards, to calculate
results? Note date of last calibration curve constructed:
❑ Yes
0 No
True values: ❑ pg/L mg/L
Obtained values: pg/L mg/L
What program are samples analyzed on?
Are results reported in proper units? Check one: /L m L
E Yes
❑ No
Are results reported between the facility's permit limit and the compliance limit of 50 pg/L?
If value is less than the low standard, report as "<x", where x=low standard conc.
❑ Yes
❑ No
Are samples analyzed within 15 minutes of collection?
❑ Yes
❑ No
IV. pH
pH meter make and model: / / �G
Is the pH meter calibrated with at least 2 buffers per mfg's instructions each day of use?
Note buffers used:
Yes
❑ No
Is the pH meter calibration checked with an additional buffer each day of use? Note check
buffer used:
Yes
❑ No
Does the check buffer read within t0.1 S.U. of the known value?
es
❑ No
Are the following items documented:
Meter calibration?
es
❑ No
Check buffer reading?
es
❑ No
Are samples analyzed within 15 minutes of collection?
es
❑ No
Are sample results reported to 0.1 pH units?
Yes
E No
/
l jv f7 , . N f''b'�^j �/: �-rr.,4-N.L••� TIC r✓•`��w
XA_�

V. Temperature
What instrument(s) is used to measure temperature? Check all that apil pH meter
❑ DO meter ❑ Conductivity meter ❑ Digital thermometer ❑ Glass therthometer
Is the instrument/thermometer calibration checked at least annually against a NIST
traceable or NIST certified thermometer?
Yes
❑ No
Are temperature corrections even if zeroposted on the instrument/thermometer?
Yes
❑ No
Are samples measured in situ or on -site? [REQUIRED - there is no holding time for
temperature]
Yes
❑ No
Are sample results reported in degrees C?
Yes
❑ No
VI. Dissolved Oxygen
DO meter make and model: J
Is the air calibration of the DO meter performed each day of use?
KLyes
❑ No
Are the following items documented:
Meter calibration?
Yes
❑ No
Are samples analyzed within 15 minutes of collection?
es
Ll No
Are results reported in m /L?
s
❑ No
VII. Conductivity
Conductivity meter make and model: 2X44S ,,� e,✓ /
Is the meter calibrated daily according to the manufacturer's instructions? Note standard
used this is generally a one -point calibration):
Yes
❑ No
Is a daily check standard analyzed? Note value:
Yes
No
Are the following items documented:
Meter calibration?
s
No
Are samples analyzed within 28 days of collection?
s
❑ No
Are results reported in mhos/cm some meters display equivalent S/cm units)?
s
❑ No
Vlll. Settleable Residue A110 f ` t✓h,1i4 7l ,xo
Does the laboratory have an Imhoff Cone in good condition?
es
❑ No
Is the sample settled for 1 hour? p9, ` Z r_1 4/p
❑ Yes
❑ No
Is the sample aitated after 45 minutes?
s
❑ No
Are the following items documented:
Volume of sample analyzed? Note volume analyzed:
Yes
❑
No
Date and time of sample analysis(settling start time)?
Yes
❑
No
Time of agitation after 45 minutes of settling?
Sample analysis completion (settlingend time)?
Are samples analyzed within 48 hours of collection?
Are results reported in ml/L?
LYesE
IX. Was a paper trail (comparing contract lab and on -site data to DMR) erformed? If so, list months reviewed: r �r�./,In/24 L 2e.X.
Is follow-u b the Laborato Cenificat' n ro ram reco ended
XI. Additional comments:
Please submit a copy of this completed form to the Laboratory Certification program at:
DWQ Lab Certification, Chemistry Lab, Courier # 52-01-01
Electronic copies may be emailed to Iinda.chavisCaDncdenr.gov.
Revision 04/20/2012

STATE OF NORTH CAKOLINA
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
FILE ACCESS RECORD
SECTION -S G./ P DATEITIME 2 Z 4- I 2-
NAME— S-$.-1 r y for REPRESENTING kST
Guidelines for Access: The staff of the Raleigh Regional Office is dedicated to making public
records in our custody readily available to the public for review and copying. We also have the
responsibility to the public to safeguard these records and to carry out our day -today program
obligations. Please read carefully the following before signing the form.
1. Due to the large public demand for file access, we request that you call at least a day in
advance to schedule an appointment for file review so you can be accommodated.
Appointments are scheduled between 9:00 a.m. and 3.00 p.m. Monday -Friday Viewing time
ends at 4:00 p.m. Anyone arriving without an appointment may view the files to the extent that
time and staff supervision are available.
2. You must specify files you want to review by facility name or incident number, as appropriate.
The number of files that you may review at one appointment will be limited to five.
3. You may make copies of a file when the copier is not in use by the staff and if time permits.
Cost per copy is 2.5 cents for ALL copies if making more than 25 copies - there is no charge if
less than 25 copies are made. Payment is to be made by check, money order, or cash in the
administrative offices.
4. FILES MUST BE KEPT IN THE ORDER YOU RECEIVED THEM. Files may not be taken
from the office. No briefcases large totes etc are permitted in the file review area. To
remove, alter, deface, mutilate, or destroy material in one of these files is a misdemeanor for
which you can be fined up to $500.00.
5. In accordance with General Statute 25-3-512, a $25.00 processing fee will be charged and
collected for checks on which payment has been refused.
6. The customer must present a photo ID, sign -in, and receive a visitor sticker prior to reviewing
files.
FACILITY NAME COUNTY
re
2. L ONi brr, [rJwr� Fn. sE/ti
3.
4.
5.
Signature and Name of Firm/Business Date Time In Time Out
Please attach a business card to this form ff available

A-4-46i�
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P. E. Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
r L
N
ErH,
January 30, 2012 D
FEB 1 - 2012
439
Mr. Richard Collins
LouisburgWater Reclamation Facility
nrtit
Y
110 West Nash Street - - —
Louisburg, NC 27549
Dear Mr. Collins:
Your letter received on January 19, 2012 concerning corrective actions for your
analytical procedures have been reviewed. The quality control measures, taken
in reference to the findings cited in the December 8, 2011 inspection report are
acceptable, with exception of the following comment:
Ammonia Nitrogen - Standard Methods, 18th Edition, 4500 NH3 C (Nesslerization)
B. Finding: The laboratory is not analyzing matrix spikes.
Requirement: Unless the referenced method states a greater frequency, spike 5% of
samples on a monthly basis. Laboratories analyzing less than 20 samples per month
must analyze at least one matrix spike each month samples are analyzed. Prepare the
matrix spike from a reference source different from that used for calibration unless
otherwise stated in the method. If matrix spike results are out of control, the results must
be qualified or the laboratory must take corrective action to rectify the effect, use another
method, or employ the method of standard additions. When the method of choice
specifies matrix spike performance acceptance criteria for accuracy, and the laboratory
chooses to develop statistically valid, laboratory -specific limits, the laboratory -generated
limits cannot be less stringent than the criteria stated in the approved method. Ref: North
Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification Policy.
Comment: A copy of the matrix spiking policy was given to the laboratory during the
inspection.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the spike solution constitutes :51% of the
total MS volume.
Laboratory Response:
1617 Mail Service Center. Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Ralegh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: 919A07-63001 FAX 91M07-6492
Internet: wvnv.nivateroualitv.oro
An Equal Opportunity � Atfnmaeve Action Employer
NorthCarci ina
Naturally

#439 Louisburg Water Reclaimation Facility
Date: January 30, 2012
Page 2 of 2
Per your e-mail of October 21, 2011 you were working on some calculations and
acceptable scheme that I can work with.
Auditor Response: it is recommended that the laboratory followup Option-1 of the
laboratory "Matrix Spiking Policy". The amount of spiking solution to be used is based on
the volume of sample being used and the concentration of the sample being spiked. A
copy of the matrix spiking policy was left with the laboratory at the time of the inspection.
No further response is necessary.
Please continue to follow all approved methods, rules and regulations.
Thank you again for your cooperation during the inspection. Contact us at
(919) 733 — 3908 Ext. 249 if you have any questions or need additional information
regarding our requirements.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey R. Adams
Laboratory Section
Cc: Dana Satterwhite
Raleigh Regional Office

LV
4*
WNW
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Mr. Mark Warren
Town of Louisburg
110 West Nash Street
Louisburg, North Carolina 27549
l0T;rM'UrrAV.f�iii
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
December 8, 2011
SUBJECT: Town of Louisburg
Louisburg WWTP
Dee Freeman
DE C ETTE
DEC 9 201. 1 D
NC DENR
Ralei,,h R-rional Office
Improvements
Approval of the Plans and Specifications
SRF No. CS370397-05
The review for completeness and adequacy of the project construction plans and
specifications has been concluded by the Construction Grants & Loans Section of the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality. Therefore, said plan documents are hereby approved.
Eligibility for Revolving Loan funding is determined as follows:
Eligible
Three (3) 250 gpm aspirators; two (2) 500 gpm sludge recirculation pumps and one pump motor;
425 feet of ductile iron pipe; and three (3) 2.7 Hp mixers.
Issuance of this approval letter does not imply availability of funding. Please note that the
Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) program is priority based system which includes
adhering to a schedule for submittal of applications through contracting. Therefore, in order to
maintain assurance of funding an Authority to Award must be obtained by December 1, 2012
and all contracts must be executed by January 2, 2013.
If any of these milestones are not met, you must reapply if you wish to seek CWSRF
funding for this project. The CWSRF program accepts applications twice per year and projects
are funded based on priority and availability of funds. We encourage you to try to complete
these milestones well before the due date to build in contingency time.
All encroachments, easements, agreements, and plan approvals must be obtained prior to
receiving Authority to Award.
1633 Mail Service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1633 One
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd. Ralegh, North Carolina 27604 NO Carolina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877.623-6748 //
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org aturial //
An Equal Opportunity r Affirmative Achon Employer i/

Mr. Mark Warren
December 8, 2011
Page Number 2
In the event that received bids exceed the amount established through the funding offer,
and local funds are not adequate to award contract(s), it will be necessary to consider all
alternatives including redesign, re -advertising, and rebidding.
Neither the State nor Federal Government, nor any of its departments, agencies or
employees is or will be a party to the invitation to bids, addenda, any resulting contracts or
contract negotiations/changes.
If the Recipient does not maintain the court -sanctioned schedules which extended the
compliance date for complying with the final effluent limits established in the NPDES Permit,
then project costs incurred will not be eligible for Revolving Loan payments.
Your project is subject to the one-year performance certification requirements. By this,
you are required on the date one year after the completion of construction and initial operation of
the subject treatment facilities, to certify, based on your consulting engineer's advisement,
whether or not such treatment works meet the design performance, specifications and the permit
conditions and effluent limitations.
In accordance with the Federal Regulations, the Recipient is required to assure compliance
with the OSHA safety regulations on the subject project. In complying with this regulatory
responsibility, the Recipient should, by letter, invite the Bureau Chief, Education Training and
Technical Assistance Unit, NC OSHA Division, 1101 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-
1101 at [phone], to participate in the Preconstruction Conference to assure that proper
emphasis is given on understanding and adhering to the OSHA regulations.
It is the responsibility of the Recipient and the Consulting Engineer to insure that the
project plan documents are in compliance with Amended N. C. G. S. 133-3 (ratified July 13,
1993). The administrative review and approval of these plans and specifications, and any
subsequent addenda or change order, do not imply approval of a restrictive specification for
bidding purposes; nor is it an authorization for noncompetitive procurement actions.
Any addenda to be issued for subject project plans and specifications must be
submitted by the Recipient such that adequate time is allowed for review/approval action
by the State and for subseauent bidder action prior to receipt of bids.
It is mandatory for project facilities to be constructed in accordance with the North
Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, and, when applicable, the North Carolina Dam
Safety Act. In addition, the specifications must clearly state what the contractors' responsibilities
shall be in complying with these Acts.
Prior to entering into any contract(s) for construction, the recipient must have obtained all
applicable project Permits from the State, including an Authorization to Construct and/or Non -
Discharge Permit.

Mr. Mark Warren
December 8, 2011
Page Number 3
While rejection of all bids is possible, such action may be taken only with prior State
concurrence, and only for good cause.
A goal of 8% of the contract price is established for Minority Business Enterprise (MBE)
participation in this project, and a goal of 5% of the contract price is established for Women's
Business Enterprise (WBE) participation in this project. The Recipient and Bidders shall make a
good -faith effort to assure that MBE's and WBE's are utilized, when possible, as sources of
goods and services. The good -faith effort must include the following affirmative steps: (a)
including small, minority, and women's businesses on solicitation lists; (b) assuring that small,
minority, and women's businesses are solicited whenever they are potential sources; (c) dividing
total requirements, when economically feasible, into small tasks or quantities to permit
maximum participation by small, minority, and women's businesses; (d) establishing delivery
schedules, and (e) using the services of the Small Business Administration and the Minority
Business Development Agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Please note that the
solicitation efforts should include documentable follow-up phone calls.
The Recipient shall comply with the provisions of 40 CFR, Part 7, Subpart C -
Discrimination Prohibited on the Basis of Handicap.
Attached is one (1) copy of the Project Bid Information which is to be completed within 21
days after bids have been received, and submitted to the State for review. Upon review and
approval of this information, the State will authorize the Recipient to make the proposed award.
Do not proceed with construction until the Authority to Award package and the EEO and
MBE documentation/certification have been reviewed, and you are in receipt of our approval, if
a CWSRF loan is desired for project construction.
Two (2) copies of any change order must be promptly submitted by the Recipient to the
State. If additional information is requested by the State, a response is required within two (2)
weeks, or the change order will be returned without further or final action.
One (1) set of the final approved plans and specifications will be forwarded to you. One
(1) set of plans and specifications identical to the approved set must be available at the project
site at all times.
Upon completion of the project construction, the Recipient shall submit a letter confirming
that the project has been constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by
the State. "As -built" plans will need to be submitted with any changes clearly documented on
the plans if the above confirmation cannot be made.
If there are any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Seth Robertson, P.E. at [phone].

Mr. Mark Warren
December 8, 2011
Page Number 4
Since/rel
Kim H. Colson, P.E., Section Chief
Construction Grants & Loans Section
Attachment
MM:sr
cc: Michael S. Acquesta, Ph.D, P.E. - O'Brien & Gere
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
OSHA Bureau Chief, Wanda Lagoe
Michelle McKay, E.I.
CIG
SRF File

�r
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
December 8, 2011
Mr. Mark Warren
Town of Louisburg
110 West Nash Street
Louisburg, North Carolina 27549
SUBJECT: Authorization to Construct
A to C No. 020231A02
Town of Louisburg
Louisburg WWTP
Dear Mr. Warren:
A letter of request for an Authorization to Construct was received October 17, 2011, by
the Division of Water Quality (Division), and final plans and specifications for the subject
project have been reviewed and found to be satisfactory. Authorization is hereby granted for the
construction of modifications to the existing 1.37 MGD Wastewater Treatment Plant, with
discharge of treated wastewater into the Tar River in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin.
This authorization results in no increase in design or permitted capacity and is awarded
for the construction of the following specific modifications:
Replacement of three (3) existing aerators with three (3) new 250 gpm aspirators;
replacement of two (2) 500 gpm sludge recirculation pumps; and replacement of
three (3) 2.7 Hp anaerobic selector zone basin mixers, in conformity with the
project plans, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed and
approved by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
This Authorization to Construct is issued in accordance with Part III, Paragraph A of
NPDES Permit No. NCO020231 issued February 17, 2010, and shall be subject to revocation
unless the wastewater treatment facilities are constructed in accordance with the conditions and
limitations specified in Permit No. NCO020231.
The sludge generated from these treatment facilities must be disposed of in accordance
with G.S. 143-215.1 and in a manner approved by the Division.
In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action, including those as may
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Location: 512 N. Salisbury SL RalegOne
h, North Carolina 27604 Ca.C011nB
Phone: 919-607-M I FAX: [phone] Customer Service: "77-623-6748
Internet www.ncwaterqualdy.org atura!!�
An Equal Opportunity 1 Afimaii" Action Employer

Mr. Mark Warren
December 8, 2011
Page 2
be required by the Division, such as the construction of additional or replacement wastewater
treatment or disposal facilities.
The Raleigh Regional Office, telephone number [phone], shall be notified at least
forty-eight (48) hours in advance of operation of the installed facilities so that an on site
inspection can be made. Such notification to the regional supervisor shall be made during the
normal office hours from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday, excluding State
Holidays.
Upon completion of construction and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a
certification must be received from a professional engineer certifying that the permitted facility
has been installed in accordance with the NPDES Permit, this Authorization to Construct and the
approved plans and specifications. Mail the Certification to: Construction Grants & Loans,
DWQ/DENR, 1633 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1633.
Upon classification of the facility by the Certification Commission, the Permittee shall
employ a certified wastewater treatment plant operator to be in responsible charge (ORC) of the
wastewater treatment facilities. The operator must hold a certificate of the type and grade at
least equivalent to or greater than the classification assigned to the wastewater treatment
facilities by the Certification Commission.
The Permittee must also employ a certified back-up operator of the appropriate type and
grade to comply with the conditions of T15A:8G.0202. The ORC of the facility must visit each
Class I facility at least weekly and each Class II, III and IV facility at least daily, excluding
weekends and holidays, must properly manage the facility, must document daily operation and
maintenance of the facility, and must comply with all other conditions of T15A:8G.0202.
A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by the
Permittee for the life of the facility.
During the construction of the proposed additions/modifications, the permittee shall
continue to properly maintain and operate the existing wastewater treatment facilities at all times,
and in such a manner, as necessary to comply with the effluent limits specified in the NPDES
Permit.
You are reminded that it is mandatory for the project to be constructed in accordance
with the North Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, and when applicable, the North
Carolina Dam Safety Act. In addition, the specifications must clearly state what the contractor's
responsibilities shall be in complying with these Acts.
Prior to entering into any contract(s) for construction, the recipient must have obtained all
applicable permits from the State.

Mr. Mark Warren
December 8, 2011
Page 3
Failure to abide by the requirements contained in this Authorization to Construct may
subject the Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division in accordance with North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C.
The issuance of this Authorization to Construct does not preclude the Permittee from
complying with any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by
other government agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
One (1) set of approved plans and specifications is being forwarded to you. If you have
any questions or need additional information, please contact Seth Robertson, P.E. at telephone
number [phone].
SiZa4-
-/-Coleen H. Sullins
ISVIUVIM
cc: Michael S. Acquesta, Ph.D, P.E. - O'Brien & Gere
Franklin County Health Department
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office, Surface Water Protection
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
Point Source Branch, NPDES Program
Michelle McKay
SRF No. CS370397-05

Town of Louisburg
A To C No. 02023IA02
Project No. CS370397-05
Issued December 8, 2011
Engineer's Certification
I, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in
the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically/weekly/full time)
the construction of the modifications and improvements to the Louisburg W WTP, located on NC
Hwy56 East in Franklin County for the Town of Louisburg, hereby state that, to the best of my
abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the following construction:
Replacement of three (3) existing aerators with three (3) new 250 gpm aspirators;
replacement of two (2) 500 gpm sludge recirculation pumps; and replacement of
three (3) 2.7 Hp anaerobic selector zone basin mixers, in conformity with the
project plans, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed and
approved by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
I certify that the construction of the above referenced project was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
Signature
Date
Mail this Certification to:
Registration No.
Attn: Michelle McKay, E.I.
Construction Grants & Loans
DENR/DWQ
1633 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1633

North Carolina
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
NG o D 2-02 3 /
NCD NR
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Mr. Mark Warren
Town of Louisburg
110 West Nash Street
Louisburg, North Carolina 27549
Dear Mr. Warren:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Dee Freeman
Director Secretary
November 8, 2011
SUBJECT: Authorization to Construct
A to C No. 020231A02
Town of Louisburg
Louisburg WWTP
A letter of request for an Authorization to Construct was received October 17, 2011, by
the Division of Water Quality (Division), and final plans and specifications for the subject
project have been reviewed and found to be satisfactory. Authorization is hereby granted for the
construction of modifications to the existing 1.37 MGD Wastewater Treatment Plant, with
discharge of treated wastewater into the Tar River in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin.
This authorization results in no increase in design or permitted capacity and is awarded
for the construction of the following specific modifications:
Replacement of three (3) existing aerators with three (3) new 250 gpm aspirators;
replacement of two (2) 500 gpm sludge recirculation pumps; and replacement of
three (3) 2.7 Hp anaerobic selector zone basin mixers, in conformity with the
project plans, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed and
approved by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
This Authorization to Construct is issued in accordance with Part III, Paragraph A of
NPDES Permit No. NCO020231 issued February 17, 2010, and shall be subject to revocation
unless the wastewater treatment facilities are constricted in accordance with the conditions and
limitations specified in Permit No. NCO020231.
The sludge generated from these treatment facilities must be disposed of in accordance
with G.S. 143-215.1 and in a manner approved by the Division.
In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action, including those as may
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 �
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Carolina
Phone: 91M07-63001 FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623.6748 roll
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org r
urKL[�
An Equal Opportunity 1 Afinnalive Action Employer

Mr. Mark Warren
November 8, 2011
Page 2
be required by the Division, such as the construction of additional or replacement wastewater
treatment or disposal facilities.
The Raleigh Regional Office, telephone number [phone], shall be notified at least
forty-eight (48) hours in advance of operation of the installed facilities so that an on site
inspection can be made. Such notification to the regional supervisor shall be made during the
normal office hours from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday, excluding State
Holidays.
Upon completion of construction and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a
certification must be received from a professional engineer certifying that the permitted facility
has been installed in accordance with the NPDES Permit, this Authorization to Construct and the
approved plans and specifications. Mail the Certification to: Construction Grants & Loans,
DWQ/DENR, 1633 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1633.
Upon classification of the facility by the Certification Commission, the Permittee shall
employ a certified wastewater treatment plant operator to be in responsible charge (ORC) of the
wastewater treatment facilities. The operator must hold a certificate of the type and grade at
least equivalent to or greater than the classification assigned to the wastewater treatment
facilities by the Certification Commission.
The Permittee must also employ a certified back-up operator of the appropriate type and
grade to comply with the conditions of T15A:8G.0202. The ORC of the facility must visit each
Class I facility at least weekly and each Class H, III and IV facility at least daily, excluding
weekends and holidays, must properly manage the facility, must document daily operation and
maintenance of the facility, and must comply with all other conditions of T15A:8G.0202.
A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by the
Permittee for the life of the facility.
During the construction of the proposed additions/modifications, the permittee shall
continue to properly maintain and operate the existing wastewater treatment facilities at all times,
and in such a manner, as necessary to comply with the effluent limits specified in the NPDES
Permit.
You are reminded that it is mandatory for the project to be constructed in accordance
with the North Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, and when applicable, the North
Carolina Dam Safety Act. In addition, the specifications must clearly state what the contractor's
responsibilities shall be in complying with these Acts.
Prior to entering into any contract(s) for construction, the recipient must have obtained all
applicable permits from the State.

Mr. Mark Warren
November 8, 2011
Page 3
Failure to abide by the requirements contained in this Authorization to Construct may
subject the Pemuttee to an enforcement action by the Division in accordance with North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C.
The issuance of this Authorization to Construct does not preclude the Permittee from
complying with any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by
other government agencies (local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
One (1) set of approved plans and specifications is being forwarded to you. If you have
any questions or need additional information, please contact Seth Robertson, P.E. at telephone
number [phone].
Sincerely,
,OfColeen H. Sullins
MM:sr
cc: Michael S. Acquesta, Ph.D, P.E. - O'Brien & Gere
Franklin County Health Department
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office, Surface Water Protection
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
Point Source Branch, NPDES Program
Michelle McKay
SRF No. CS370397-05

Town of Louisburg
A To C No. 020231 A02
Project No. CS370397-05
Issued November 8, 2011
Engineer's Certification
I, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in
the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically/weekly/full time)
the construction of the modifications and improvements to the Louisburg W WTP, located on NC
Hwy56 East in Franklin County for the Town of Louisburg, hereby state that, to the best of my
abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the following construction:
Replacement of three (3) existing aerators with three (3) new 250 gpm aspirators;
replacement of two (2) 500 gpm sludge recirculation pumps; and replacement of
three (3) 2.7 Hp anaerobic selector zone basin mixers, in conformity with the
project plans, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed and
approved by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
I certify that the construction of the above referenced project was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the approved plans and specifications.
Signature Registration No.
Date
Mail this Certification to: Attn: Michelle McKay, E.I.
Construction Grants & Loans
DENR/DWQ ED�.—
1633 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1633

NCDETIR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Mr. Mark Warren
Town of Louisburg
110 West Nash Street
Louisburg, North Carolina 27549
Dear Mr. Warren:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
November 8, 2011
SUBJECT: Town of Louisburg
Louisburg WWTP
Improvements
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Approval of the Plans and Specifications
SRF No. CS370397-05
The review for completeness and adequacy of the project construction plans and
specifications has been concluded by the Construction Grants & Loans Section of the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality. Therefore, said plan documents are hereby approved.
Eligibility for Revolving Loan funding is determined as follows:
Eligible
Three (3) 250 gpm aspirators; two (2) 500 gpm sludge recirculation pumps and one pump motor;
425 feet of ductile iron pipe; and three (3) 2.7 Hp mixers.
Issuance of this approval letter does not imply availability of funding. Please note that the
Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) program is priority based system which includes
adhering to a schedule for submittal of applications through contracting. Therefore, in order to
maintain assurance of fundine an Authority to Award must be obtained by December 1, 2012
and all contracts must be executed by January 2, 2013.
If any of these milestones are not met, you must reapply if you wish to seek CWSRF
funding for this project. The CWSRF program accepts applications twice per year and projects
are funded based on priority and availability of funds. We encourage you to try to complete
these milestones well before the due date to build in contingency time.
All encroachments, easements, agreements, and plan approvals must be obtained prior to
receiving Authority to Award.
1633 Mail service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1633 One
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 OC1r0tlil$
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org aturalll,,r
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Mark Warren
November 8, 2011
Page Number 2
In the event that received bids exceed the amount established through the funding offer,
and local funds are not adequate to award contract(s), it will be necessary to consider all
alternatives including redesign, re -advertising, and rebidding.
Neither the State nor Federal Government, nor any of its departments, agencies or
employees is or will be a party to the invitation to bids, addenda, any resulting contracts or
contract negotiations/changes.
If the Recipient does not maintain the court -sanctioned schedules which extended the
compliance date for complying with the final effluent limits established in the NPDES Permit,
then project costs incurred will not be eligible for Revolving Loan payments.
Your project is subject to the one-year performance certification requirements. By this,
you are required on the date one year after the completion of construction and initial operation of
the subject treatment facilities, to certify, based on your consulting engineer's advisement,
whether or not such treatment works meet the design performance, specifications and the permit
conditions and effluent limitations.
In accordance with the Federal Regulations, the Recipient is required to assure compliance
with the OSHA safety regulations on the subject project. In complying with this regulatory
responsibility, the Recipient should, by letter, invite the Bureau Chief, Education Training and
Technical Assistance Unit, NC OSHA Division, 1101 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-
1101 at [phone], to participate in the Preconstruction Conference to assure that proper
emphasis is given on understanding and adhering to the OSHA regulations.
It is the responsibility of the Recipient and the Consulting Engineer to insure that the
project plan documents are in compliance with Amended N. C. G. S. 133-3 (ratified July 13,
1993). The administrative review and approval of these plans and specifications, and any
subsequent addenda or change order, do not imply approval of a restrictive specification for
bidding purposes; nor is it an authorization for noncompetitive procurement actions.
Any addenda to be issued for subject project plans and specifications must be
submitted by the Recipient such that adequate time is allowed for review/approval action
by the State and for subsequent bidder action prior to receipt of bids.
It is mandatory for project facilities to be constructed in accordance with the North
Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control Act, and, when applicable, the North Carolina Dam
Safety Act. In addition, the specifications must clearly state what the contractors' responsibilities
shall be in complying with these Acts.
Prior to entering into any contract(s) for construction, the recipient must have obtained all
applicable project Permits from the State, including an Authorization to Construct and/or Non -
Discharge Permit.

Mr. Mark Warren
November 8, 2011
Page Number 3
While rejection of all bids is possible, such action may be taken only with prior State
concurrence, and only for good cause.
A goal of 8% of the contract price is established for Minority Business Enterprise (MBE)
participation in this project, and a goal of 5% of the contract price is established for Women's
Business Enterprise (WBE) participation in this project. The Recipient and Bidders shall make a
good -faith effort to assure that MBE's and WBE's are utilized, when possible, as sources of
goods and services. The good -faith effort must include the following affirmative steps: (a)
including small, minority, and women's businesses on solicitation lists; (b) assuring that small,
minority, and women's businesses are solicited whenever they are potential sources; (c) dividing
total requirements, when economically feasible, into small tasks or quantities to permit
maximum participation by small, minority, and women's businesses; (d) establishing delivery
schedules, and (e) using the services of the Small Business Administration and the Minority
Business Development Agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Please note that the
solicitation efforts should include documentable follow-up phone calls.
The Recipient shall comply with the provisions of 40 CFR, Part 7, Subpart C -
Discrimination Prohibited on the Basis of Handicap.
Attached is one (1) copy of the Project Bid Information which is to be completed within 21
days after bids have been received, and submitted to the State for review. Upon review and
approval of this information, the State will authorize the Recipient to make the proposed award.
Do not proceed with construction until the Authority to Award package and the EEO and
MBE documentation/certification have been reviewed, and you are in receipt of our approval, if
a CWSRF loan is desired for project construction.
Two (2) copies of any change order must be promptly submitted by the Recipient to the
State. If additional information is requested by the State, a response is required within two (2)
weeks, or the change order will be returned without further or final action.
One (1) set of the final approved plans and specifications will be forwarded to you. One
(1) set of plans and specifications identical to the approved set must be available at the project
site at all times.
Upon completion of the project construction, the Recipient shall submit a letter confirming
that the project has been constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by
the State. "As -built" plans will need to be submitted with any changes clearly documented on
the plans if the above confirmation cannot be made.
If there are any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Seth Robertson, P.E. at [phone].

Mr. Mark Warren
November 8, 2011
Page Number 4
Sincere 00,
Kim H. Colson, P.E., Section Chief
Construction Grants & Loans Section
Attachment
MM:sr
cc: Michael S. Acquesta, Ph.D, P.E. - O'Brien & Gere
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
OSHA Bureau Chief, Wanda Lagoe
Michelle McKay, E.I.
CIG
SRF File

Nov 30 11 11:33a Louisburg Water Reclamati 9194962883 P.1
In lieu of performing the required annual Effluent Pollutant Scan and to satisfy the NPDES reporting
requirement, a municipa! wastewater treatment facility may complete and submit this form to NCDWQ if
the following criteria are met:
➢ The facility can still meet the requirement to perform three pollutant scans for its next NPDES
permit application; and
D Has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 MGD; or
➢ Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place); or
➢ Is otherwise required by the NCDWQ to conduct an annual effluent pollutant scan.
Facility Name:
Louisburg Water Reclamation Facility
NPDES Permit Number.
NCO020231
outfall Number.
001
Effective Date:
April 01,2010
(Completeformfor each outfall discharging effluent to watersof
the state and requiring on annual Effluent Pollutant Scan)
Expiration Date:
September 30, 2014
owner Information
Person Certifying the Form
Owner / Permittee Name: Town of Louisburg
Mark Warren
Certitler's Name: Jimmy Ellington
Title (if applicable): Town Administrator
Title or Position with facility: Plant Superintendant
Email Address: mwarrenf arTlifz.com
Email Address: [e-mail]
Mailing Address: 110 West Nash Street
Louisburg, NC 27549
Mailing Address: 110 West Nash Street
Louisburig. NC 27S49
City, State Zip:
city, State Zip:
Telephone: [phone]
Telephone: [phone]
By completing and submitting this form,1, Jimmy Ellington (printed name) certify
that the effluent waste stream for the facility and outtall indicated above has not significantly changed
within the past year in a manner that would cause any of the listed parameters to be present or present in
concentrations greater than previously reported and I hereby submit this completed form to satisfy the
NPDES annual Effluent Pollutant Scan reporting requirement for calendar year 2011
I also attest that the facility can still meet Ireqmentto perform three pollutant scans for the next
NPDES permit application.
Certified by (signature):
Position or title of certifier: WWTP intendant
Date certified: November 30, 2011
This completed form shall be submitted along with the Discharge Monitoring Report to the following address: Division
of Water Quality/Surface Water Protection Section /Central Files, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina
27699-161 Z

Aug 01 11 09:33a L— isbure Water Reclamati 919" 2883 p.2
Louisburg Wastewater Treatment Plant
Performance Annual Report
July 1, 2010 — June 30, 2011
I. General Information
Facility Name: Louisburg Wastewater Treatment Plant
Responsible Entity: Town of Louisburg
Person in Charge/Contact: Jimmy Ellington, Plant Superintendent 919-496-2677
Applicable Permits:
NPDES Permit No. NCO020231 (Wastewater Discharge)
General Permit No. NC G110000 (Stormwater Discharge)
Non -Discharge Permit No. WQ0005981 (Biosolids Land Appliction)
Non -Discharge Permit No. W00019992 (Conjunctive Reclaimed Water System)
Treatment Process Description
The Louisburg WWTP is an extended aeration system with a permitted treatment
capacity of 1,370,000 gallons per day. It consists of influent screening and grit /grease
removal, an anaerobic mixing zone, two oxidation ditches, two secondary clarifiers, three
tertiary filters, ultraviolet disinfection, cascade aeration, two aerobic digesters and one
effluent reuse station (currently unused).
H. Performance
The Louisburg W WTP facility was compliant throughout the entire twelve month period
with no violations. The facility operated well within design efficiency with some
mechanical breakdowns, but all malfunctions were corrected as needed.
The table below shows plant performance in relationship with NPDES permit limits.
LOUISGURG WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EFFLUENT (DISCHARGE WATER) ANALYSIS
Parameter Summer W-mter
NPDES Limits
Actual Values
Average
NPDES Limits
Actual Values
Average
6.0 to 9-0 s.u_
6.68 7.79 sar.
6.0 to 9.0 S.u_
6.65-711 sa
CBOD5 200 C
8.0 mg/L
2.03mg/l
16.0 mg/L
_CO
2.03mg/l
Amnuoom
Nitrogen
3.0 mg/L
0.20mgil
mg/L
023mg/l
Total
Suspended
Residue
30 mg/L
2.96mg/1
30 �
6-69>itg/1
Fecal Coli6oum
200d100 ml
25.04/100ad
200/100 ml
15.22/100m1
Dissolved
ea
5.0 mg/L
minimum
7.46mg/1
5.0 mg/L
minimum
9.53mg/1

Aug 01 11 09:33a l^,•isburg Water Reclamati 91F'-32883 p.3
Flow 11.37 MGD 10.5496MOD 11.37 MGD 10.5615MGD
M. Notification
This report will be published in the Franklin Times Newspaper.
IV. Certification
I certify under penalty of law that this report is complete and accurate to the best of my
knowledge. I further certify that this report has been made available to the users or
custome of the named system and that those users have been notified of its availability.
Tim F. motnn Date
Town

Aug 01 11 09:32a Inuisburg Water Reclamati 91QAQ62883 p.l
LOUISBURG WRF
FAX COVER SHEET
DATE: 8-01-2011
TO: Dave Parnell, NCDENR DWQ
FROM: Jimmy Ellington, WWTP ORC
PAGES (MCLUDINGCOVER): 3
COMMENTS:
Dave, here is a copy of the Louisburg WWTP
annual performance report for your records.
This will be published in the local Franklin
Times for public notice as usual. If you have
any questions give me a call at 919496-2677.
Thanks

Jun 22 11 10:25a Inuisburg Water Reclamati 91g4962883 p.12
M
v
7 R O T E S T
SAMPLE
PRESERVATION CHECK -IN SHEET
Checked in by:
0(
Date:
/1
Tii Z.
7cmp:
Route:
CD
TTS
P
USM
FEDX
GC
UPS
Sample
No.
Analysis Requested
Chlorine
Samples Preserved
Properly?
Comments
LTA—
Pos /
No
N/A
Pos/ g
Irg
I No I
N/A
Pos/ r1bg
s
No
N/A
Pos/neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos/neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos neg
Yes
No
NJA
Pos neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos/neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos / neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos/neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos / neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos/neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos/neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos/neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos / neg
Yes
No
NiA
Pos/neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos/neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos / neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos neg
—Pos
Yes
No
N/A
neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos / neg
Yes
No
N/A
(_C1,IQD
AT OnAAAACXTI�O.
Pos/neg
Yes
No
N/A

Jun 22 11 10:24a Louisburg Water Reclamati 9194962883 P.9
O
O SAMPLE PRESERVATION CHECK -IN SHEET
7 R OU T E S T Checked in by.
Date: 5, Time:
Temp:
Route: I USM I FEDX I CC IUPS
Sample
No.
Analysis Requested
Chlorine
Samples Preserved
Properly?
Comments
/1)q6 /
Pos/ g
es
I No
I N/A
!
Pos /ne
Y
I No
I N/A
Pos / ned
Y
No
I N/A
/
l
s
Pos/n
Y s
No
I N/A
a
PoIn
s
No
N/A
2
G /, 3
Po
es
No
N/A
Pos /leg
es
No
N/A
Pos /
es
No
N/A
Pos/
Yes
No
N/A
Pos / neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos / neg
Yes
No
NIA
Pos / neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos / neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos / neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos / neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos / neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos/neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos/neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos/neg
Yes
No
N/A
Posing
Yes
No
N/A
Pos neg
Ycs
No
N/A
Pos ! neg
Yes
No
NIA
Post neg
Yes
No
NIA
Pos/neg
Yes
No
N/A
Pos/neg
Yes
No
NIA

Jun 22 11 10:24a Inuisburg Water Reclamati 9144962883 P.10
o Page 1 of 1
TFROTEST
Laboratory Report
Lob Locabon 71' Lob Loco!%cn 'C' Lob Locoboa 'W
NC1WW Cert.#: 067 NCIDW Cert.#: 37731 NCM/W Cert.#: 103 NC1DW Cert.#: 37733 NCANW Cert.#: 075 NCIDW Cert.#: 37721
6701 Conference Dr, Raleigh, NC 27607 6300 Ramada Or, Suite C2, Clemmons, NC 27012 6624 Gordon Rd, Unit G, Wilmington, NC 28411
Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone] r Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone] Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone]
i
Project No.: WASTEWATER
Project ID: Low Level Mercury
-- Prepared for —
RICHARD COLLINS
LOUISBURG WRF
110 WEST NASH STREET
LOUISBURG, NC 27549
Report Date: 6/10/2011
Date Received: 6/3/2011
Work Order #: 1106-00236
Cust. Code: L02677
Cust. P.O.#:
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
001 Effluent 6/3/2011 9:18 WW Grab Ambient
Test Performed Method Results Lab Loc- DaizedTme Qualifier
Low Level Mercury EPA 1631 2A4 ng/L R 619111 6:27
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
002 Field Blank 613/2011 9:15 OT Grab Ambient
Test Performed Method Results Lab Loc- pazedTme Qualifier
Low Level Mercury EPA 1631 a1.0 ng/L R 6/9/11 6:27
Reviewed by.
for Tritest, Inc.

0
'P,, TE ST
6701 Conference Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607
ph: [phone] fax: [phone]
a NCWWCert#67, NCDWCert#37731
Report Results To:
LOUISBURG WRF
110 WEST NASH STREET
LOUISBURG, NC 27549
M
m
m
N
(D
m
a
m
m
y
e
E
N
U
fU
L
W
N
N
3
U
L
7
M
N
U
J
Attn: RICHARD COLLINS
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
11o6-4�6.
Chain of" Custody Tritest W.O.#:
LOUISBURG WRF
Bill Results To:
❑ Standard Report Delivery age 1 of 1-
TOWN of LOUISBURG ❑ Rush Report Delivery (w/ surcharge) Note: Rush projects
are subject to prior
110 WEST NASH STREET Requested Due Date: approval by Lab
LOUISBURG, NC 27549
Project Reference: Low/Level Mercury
Attn: SEAN MEDLIN Purchase Order #: 12/
Sampled By:
Sample Description
Composite
Start Date
Stop Date
Matrix
or Grab
Start Time
top
-Time
WWUW
Analyses
Anal Requested
y q
Strip #
p
SW, GW etc.
Effluent
G
-
;1
WW
Low Level Mercury
001
Field Blank
G
OT
Low Level Mercury
002
11
Relin - i u e)
acerved b g
r
Dale
G-3 �r
Time
15
For Lab Use Only:
lJ
Temperatue at receipt:
Re inquished by (signature)
Received b sign uNij
Date
Time
Relinquished by (signature
Received by (signature)
Date
Time
Temp: C.

m
IL
M
m
m
N
(D
m
It
m
m
rp
e
m
u
w
L
N
a�
N
3
U
L
D
N
j
0
J
N
7
N
O
N
N
C
7
n
cT�ST Chain of Custody TritestW.O #:
6701 Conference Drive, Raleigh, INC 27607
ph: [phone] fax: [phone] LOUISBURG WRF
NCWW Carl # 67, NCDW Cert # 37731
Report Results To: Bill Results To:
Standard Report Delivery Page 1 0
❑ Rush Report Delivery (w/ surcharge) Note: Rush projects
LOUISBURG WRF TOWN of LOUISBURG are subject to prior
110 WEST NASH STREET 110 WEST NASH STREET Requested Due Date: approval by tab
LOUISBURG, NC 27549 LOUISBURG, NC 27549
Project Reference: Priority Pollutant Analysis
Attn: RICHARD COLLINS Attn: SEAN MEDLIN Purchase Order#:
Phone: [phone] Fax [phone] Sampled By:�'�
Sample Description
Composite
Start Date
Stop Date
Matrix
orGrab
Start Time
Stop
Analyses Requested
Y e9
Sm #
p
.Time-
SW..G
SW, Gw etc.
Composite
C
S' `(p ��
O5 �7 (
WW
Ammonia, Nitrate -Nitrite, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Total Phosphorus, Total
001
Dissolved Solids, Lead, Antimony, Arsenic, Beryllium, Cadmium,
'09as
Chromium, Copper, Nickel, Selenium, Silver, Thallium, Zinc, TOTAL
HARDNESS (WW), Calcium, Magnesium, Phenols,
Semivolatile TTOs by 625, Metals Prep, Alkali Metals Prep
Grab
G
�s �7 /
W W
Cyanide, Oil & Grease, Volatile TTOs by GC/MS
002
e i is y i nature
"�
ecei h
y
Time 1s
For Lab Use Only:
/
�J
Temperatue at receipt:
Relinquished by signature)
/
Recew by (signature)
D�Ee-•
tJ
Tim .
/
Relinquished by (signatur
Received by (signature)
Date
Time
Temp: C°

Jun 22 11 10:23a —jisburg Water Reclamati 910"�62883
p.2
1"Aft 1'0 IIIII
1Nash St.
Louisburg,
, N.C. 27549
[phone]
[phone] Fax
June 22, 2011
NCDENR / DWQ/ CENTRAL FILES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Central Files,
s&& Oj Naa& e
Please find enclosed, the annual Effluent Pollutant Analysis for the Town of
Louisburg Water Reclamation Facility for the year 2011. This copy is being mailed
to DWQ Central Files to comply with permit # NC0020231.
Si
JimMy Ellington
Louisburg WRF ORC

Jun 22 11 10:23a Louisburg Water Reclamati 9194962883 p.3
o Page 1 of 5
VQcTEST
Laboratory Report
S Lob location R Cob locobon 'C' Cob /ocolion 'W'
i NCrWW Cert.ik 067 NCrDW Cart.#: 37731 NCANW Cen.#: 103 NG/DW Cart.#: 37733 NCNJVV CertA: 075 NC/DW Geri.#: 37721
6701 Conference Dr, Raleigh, NC 27607 6300 Ramada Dr, Suite C2, Clemmons, NC 27012 6624 Gordon Rd, Unit G, Wilmington, NC 28411
Ph: (919) 834AS84 Fax: [phone] Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone] Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Project No.: WASTEWATER
Project ID: Priority Pollutant Analysis
- Prepared for -
RICHARD COLLINS
LOUISBURG WRF
110 WEST NASH STREET
LOUISBURG, NC 27549
Report Date: 5/26/2011
Date Received: 5117/2011
Work Order #: 1105-01156
Cust. Code: L02677
Cust. P.O.#:
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type - Condition
001 Composite 5/1712011 9:00 WW Composite 4 +/. 2 deg C
Test Performed
Method
Results
Lab Loc ua1�zedTime Qualifier
Ammonia
EPA 350.1
0.02 mg/L as N
R
5124M 1
10:30
Nitrate -Nitrite
EPA 353.2
0.61 mg/L as N
R
5124/11
13:06
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
EPA 351.2
0.51 mg/L
R
5/26111
13:43
Total Phosphorus
EPA 365.4
<0.05 mg/L
R
5/25111
13:30
Total Dissolved Solids
2540C
243 nri
R
5/19M1
16:30
Lead
EPA 200.8
<0.005 mg/L
R
5/23111
17:00
Antimony
EPA 200.8
<0.003 mg1L
R
5/23111
17:00
Arsenic
EPA200.8
<0.005 mg/L
R
5123111
17:00
Beryllium
EPA200.8
<0.002mg/L
R
5123111
17:00
Cadmium
EPA200.8
<0.005 mg1L
R
5/23111
17:00
Chromium
EPA200.8
<0.010mg/L
R
5123/11
17:00
Copper
EPA 200.8
<0.010 mg/L
R
5123M1
17:00
Nickel
EPA 200.8
<0.010 mg1L
R
5/23111
17:00
Selenium
EPA200.8
<0.002mg/L
R
5123/11
17:00
Silver
EPA200.8
<0.010mg/L
R
5123111
17:00
Thallium
EPA200.8
<0.001 mg/L
R
5/23/11
17:00
Zinc
EPA200.8
0,086 mg/L
R
5123/11
17:00
TOTAL HARDNESS (WW)
R
0:00
Calcium
EPA200.8
34.4 mg1L
R
5/24/11
11:29
Magnesium
EPA200.8
2.90mg/L
R
5124111
11:29
Total Hardness Calculation
CALC.
97.8 mg/L
R
5/24/11
11:29
Phenols
EPA420.4
12.2ug1L
R
5120111
10:03
Semivolathe TTOs by 625
EPA 625
R
5/18111
14:00
Acenaphthylene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
5118111
14:00
Acenaphthene
EPA625
<10 ug/L
R
5118/11
14:00
Anthracene
EPA625
<10ug/L
R
5118111
14:00
Benzidine
EPA 625
<50 ug/L
R
5118111
14.00
Benzo(a)anthracene
EPA625
<10 ug/L
R
5/18/11
14:00
Senzo(b)fluoranthene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
5/18111
14:00
Senzo(k)fluoranthene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
5/18111
14:00
Benzo(a)pyrane
EPA625
<10 ug/L
R
5/18/11
14:00
Benzo(g,hJ)perylene
EPA 025
<10 ug/L
R
5118111
14:00

Jun 22 11 10:23a Louisburg Water Reclamati 91g4g62883 p.4
o
o
CTC� oTEST
6701 Conference Drive Page 2 of 5
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] NC1WW Cert. #: 067
Fax: [phone] NC/DW Cert. ii: 37731
Laboratory Report
Work Order #: 1105-01156
No.
Sample ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled
Matrix
Sample Type
Condition
001
Composite
5/1712011
9:00
WW
Composite
4+1- 2 deg C
Test Performed
Method
Results
Qualifier
Benzyl butyl phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug1L
R
5118111
14:00
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
EPA 625
<10 ugIL
R
5/18111
14:00
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
EPA625
<10 ug/L
R
5/18111
14:00
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
EPA 625
<10 ugIL
R
5/18111
14:00
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ugIL
R
5118111
14:00
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
5118/11
14:00
2-Chloronaphthalene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
5118/11
14:00
4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
EPA 625
<10 ugIL
R
5118/11
14:00
2-Chlorophenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
5/18111
14:00
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
EPA625
<10 ug/L
R
6/18/11
14:00
Chrysene
EPA625
<10 ug/L
R
5/18111
14:00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
5/18111
14:00
Di-n-butyl phthalate
EPA625
<10 ug/L
R
5118111
14:00
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
EPA 625
<20 ug/L
R
5118111
14:00
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
5/18/11
14:00
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
5/18111
14:00
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
EPA625
<10ug/L
R
5/18111
14:00
2,4•Dichlorophenol
EPA625
<10 ug/L
R
5/18/11
14:00
Diethyl phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
5/18/11
14:00
2,4-Dimethylphenol
EPA625
<10ug/L
R
5/18111
14:00
Dimethyl phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
5118111
14:00
2,4-Dinitrophenol
EPA 625
<50 ugIL
R
5118111
14:00
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
EPA625
<10 ug/L
R
5118111
14:00
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
EPA625
<10 ug/L
R
5118/11
14:00
Di-n-octyl phthalate
EPA625
<10 ugIL
R
5118/11
14:00
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
EPA625
<10 ugIL
R
5/18111
14:00
Fluoranthene
EPA625
<10 ug/L
R
5118111
14:00
Fluorene
EPA625
<10 ugIL
R
5118/11
14:00
Hexachlorobenzene
EPA625
<10 ugIL
R
5118111
14:00
Hexachlorobutadiene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
5118111
14:00
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
5/18111
14:00
Hexachloroethane
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
5118111
14:00
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
EPA625
<10 ugIL
R
5/18111
14:00
Isophorone
EPA625
<10 ugIL
R
5/18/11
14:00
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
EPA625
<50 ugIL
R
5/18111
14:00
Naphthalene
EPA625
<10 ug/L
R
5/18/11
14:00
Nitrobenzene
EPA625
<10ug/L
R
5/18111
14:00
2-Nitrophenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
5118111
14:00
4-Nitrophenot
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
5118/11
14:00
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
EPA625
<10 ugIL
R
5118111
14:00
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
EPA625
<20 ugIL
R
5118/11
14:00

Jun 22 11 10:23a Louisburg Water Reclamati 9144962883 p.5
' c
0
TQdTEST
6701 Conference Drive Page 3 of 5
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] NCAVW Cert. #: 067
Fax: [phone] NC/DW Cart #: 37731
Laboratory Report
Work Order #: 1105-01156
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
001 Composite 5/1712011 9:00 WW Composite 4+/.2deg C
Test Performed
Method
Results
Lab Loc %ftzedTime Qualifier
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
EPA 625
<20 ug/L
R 5/18/11
14.00
Pentachlorophenol
EPA 625
430 ug/L
R 5/18111
14:00
Phenanthrene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R 5118111
14:00
Phenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R 5/18111
14:00
Pyrene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R 5118111
14:00
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
EPA 625
<20 ug/L
R 5118111
14:00
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
EPA625
<10 ug/L
R 5/18111
14:00
No. Sample ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled Matrix
Sample Type
Condition
002 Grab
5/17/2011
9:00 VM
Grab
4 +/- 2 deg C
Test Performed
Method
Results
Lab Loc DajVzeITime
Qualifier
Cyanide
LQC10-204-00-1-X
<0.005 mglL
R
5118111
9:30
Oil & Grease
EPA 1664A
<5.0 mg/L
R
5119111
14:00
Volatile TTOs by GCIMS
EPA 624
R
5/18/11
10:57
Acrolein
EPA 624
<50ug/L
R
5/18111
10:57
K
Acrylonitrile
EPA 624
<60 ug/L
R
5118/11
10:57
K
Benzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
5118/11
10:57
K
Bromodichloromethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
5118111
10:57
K
Bromoform
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
5118111
10:57
K
Bromomethane
EPA 624
<10 ug/L
R
5118/11
10:57
K
Carbon tetrachloride
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
5118/11
10:57
K
Chlorobenzene
EPA624
<5 ug/L
R
5118/11
10:57
K
Chloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
5118111
10:57
K
2-Chloroethylvino ether
EPA 624
<10 ug/L
R
5118111
10:57
K
Chloroform
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
5118111
10:57
K
Chloromethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
5I18/11
10:57
K
Dibromochloromethane
EPA 624
<5ug/L
R
5/18111
10:67
K
1,1-Dichloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
5118/11
10:57
K
1,2-Dichloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
5118111
10:57
K
1,1-Dichloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
5M8111
10:57
K
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
5118111
10:57
K
1,2-Dichloropropane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
5/18111
10:57
K
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
5118111
10:57
K
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
5118111
10:57
K
Ethylbenzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
5/18/11
10:67
K
Methylene chloride
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
5118111
10:57
K
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
5118/11
10:57
K
Tetrachloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
5118/11
10:57
K
Toluene
EPA 624
<5 uglL
R
5118111
10:57
K

Jun 22 11 10:24a Louisburg Water Reclamati 91QAQ62883
' c
0
INTEST
6701 Conference Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
Work Order #: 1105-01156
P.6
Page 4 of 5
NC1WW Cert. #: 067
NC1DW Cart. #: 37731
No.
Sample ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled
Matrix
Sample Type
Condition
002
Grab
5/1712011
9:00
WW
Grab
4 +1-2 deg C
Test Performed Method Results Labb Loc Da&e edTme Qualifier
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
EPA 624
<10 ug/L
R
5118111
10:67
K
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
5118111
10:57
K
Tdchloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
5118111
10:57
K
Vinyl chloride
EPA 624
<5 uglL
R
5/18111
10:57
K
Reviewed by:
for Tritest,

Jun 22 11 10:24a ^uisburg Water Reclamati 91---IG2883
• c
UN0 0TEST
6701 Conference Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
Work Order #: 1105-01156
DATA REPORTING QUALIFIERS
P.'?
Page 5 of 5
NCIWW Cert. #: 067
NC/DW Cert. #: 37731
Any values on the Tritest Laboratory Report that are flagged under the column labeled "Qualifier"
are considered qualified data. Please refer to the list below for interpretation of such flags. Please
note that Tritest is required to notify the state of any compliance samples received outside the
established protocol. In the opinion of this laboratory, values subject to these qualifiers are
acceptable but qualified.
A: The sample was improperly preserved at the time of collection. Tritest added the
appropriate preservative and analyzed per customer request.
B: The sample was received outside the established protocol for temperature and
was analyzed per customer request.
G: Insufficient sample volume provided.
D: The sample was received and analyzed outside the holding time per customer request.
E: The holding time expired prior to analysis due to laboratory error.
F: The sample tested present for residual chlorine when received at the laboratory.
G: The sample tested present for residual chlorine when checked by the technician at
room temperature.
H: Matrix interference.
l: Matrix interference; Duplicate RPD outside the acceptable range.
J: Matrix interference; Surrogate recovery outside the acceptable range.
K Matrix interference; Matrix spike recovery outside the acceptable range.
L: The duplicate RPD was outside that acceptable range.
M: Estimated value.
N: The oil & grease value exceeds method specification of 1000 mg/L maximum.
O: Excessive oil and grease noted ( ).
P: The GGA standard for BOD was outside the acceptable range.
Q: The technician was required to add stronger sodium sulfite solution than acceptable
for BOD to neutralize excessive chlorine level.
R: The seed control for BOD was outside the acceptable range.
S: The control blanks for BOD were outside the acceptable range.
T: Other:

Louisburg Water Reclamati 9194962883
p.1
Jun 22 11 10:22a
1 f
476aw oj 1101
110 W. Nash St.
Louisburg, N.C. 27549
[phone]
[phone] Fax
LOUISBURG WRF
FAX COVER SHEET
DATE: June 22, 2011
TO: Dave Parnell / DWQ / Fax# [phone]
FROM: Jimmy Ellington / Louisburg WRF ORC
PAGES CLUDMGCOVER : 12 01v
r�A
COMMENTS:
Dave, 2011 PPA including COC forms and cover letter
for submission to DWQ Central Files. Any questions
feel free to give me a call at 919-496-2677. Thanks

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
May 13, 2011
Mr. Karl Pemell
110 W Nash St.
Louisburg, NC 27549
Subject: Whole effluent toxicity test results
Louisburg WWTP
NPDES Permit # NCO02023 1 /001
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Pernell,
Dee Freeman
Secretary
The aquatic toxicity test using 24-hr composite samples of effluent discharged from Louisburg WWTP
has been completed. Louisburg WWTP has an effluent discharge permitted that is 1.37 million gallons
per day (MGD) entering Tar River (7Q10 of 14.0 CFS). Whole effluent samples were collected on April
12 and April 14 by Vicki Webb and Tom Ascenzo for use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass -fail
toxicity test. The test using these samples resulted in a pass. Toxicity test information follows.
Test Type 3-Brood Ceriodaphnia dubia chronic pass fail
Test Concentrations 13%
Test Result Pass
Control Survival 100%
Control Mean Reproduction 24.8 neonates
Test Treatment Survival
100%
Treatment Mean Reproduction
23.5 neonates
First Sample pH
7.53 SU
First Sample Conductivity
405 micromhos/cm
First Sample "Total Residual Chlorine
<0.10 mg/L
Second Sample pH
7.45 SU
Second Sample Conductivity
417 micromhos/cm
Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine
<0.10 m¢/L
If you have any questions concerning the toxicity sampling or results, please contact me either by phone
at [phone] or email at vicki.webb(@ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
Vicki�Webb
Environmental Specialist
cc: RRO files
No�` Carolina
NatUra!!y
North Carolina Division or Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: w .nmvaterquality.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 I NI 2 15I 31 NCO020231 j t1 12I 11/04/1i 117 181 al 19US
¢I 201J LJ IJ
IJ U
Remarks
21111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111116
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA --------------------------- Reserved ----------------------
67I 1 69 70`72J 73IJ74 75L 1 I 1 I I 180
71ilty
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
08:00 AM 11/04/11
10/04/01
Louisburg WWTP
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
wastewater Dr
Louisburg NC 27549
03:00 PM 11/04/11
14/09/30
Names) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Karl T Peroell,110 W Nash St Louisburg NC Contacted
275492526//919-496-3405/9194966319 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Other
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
12 K�.`y zu rl
Vicki Webb RRO WQ///
tom ascenzo 2�� _ RRO WQ//919-791-4200/
CJ
of Manag ant A Wer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
oi,nare
a
c"
EPA Fo 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

Permit: NCO020231
Inspection Date: 0411112011
Owner -Facility: Louisburg WWTP
Inspection Type: Bioassay Compliance
Other Yes No NA NE
Comment: Tox test ran to week of April 11, 2011. Facility passed.
Page # 3

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
3/28/2011
Mr. Mark Warren, Town Manager
Town of Louisburg.
110 W. Nash Street
Louisburg, North Carolina 27549-2526
Dee Freeman
Secretary
SUBJECT: Town of Louisburg
Project No. E-SRG-T-00-0094
Edgewood Drive Sewer Improvements
Engineer: Steve Scruggs, P.E. AECOM
Contractor: DeVere Construction Company
3/28/2011, Progress Meeting, Site Visit and
Construction Inspection
Dear Mr. Warren
I represent the Construction Grants and Loans Section of the Division of Water Quality,
and attend the Monthly Progress Meetings, conduct Construction Inspections, and review Project
Documentation for your SRG Project No E-SRG-T-09-0078. The progress meeting, site visit,
and construction inspection were held on 3/28/2011.
The assistance of Steve Scruggs P.E. and Wayne Woodlief with AECOM Consultants;
Mike Habig and others with DeVere Construction Company; Ray Patterson and Carlton Tabrow
and other Town of Louisburg staff is greatly appreciated. The project plans, specifications,
permits, construction schedule, funding, testing reports, site visits and inspections by other
agencies, and work done by sub -contractors, SRG and USDA funding requirements, and pay
requests were discussed and are documented by the Engineer's Progress Meeting minutes. I
photograph the construction materials, site, and activities during my site visits and inspections.
The requirements for these vubfically funded vrollects are very important. Information
about these requirements has been provided and they are to be discussed and reviewed at all
progress meetings. Documentation is to be kept on file for possible future audits or review. If
you have any questions or comments, please contact me at 919-733-6900, or at e-mail address
(tom.poe @ncdenr.gov).
Sincerely,
Tom S. Poe, Construction Inspector
Attachments:
CG&L Construction Inspection Report, Engineer's Progress Meeting Minutes, photos
cc: Steve Scruggs P.E., AECOM
SRG, CIG, PMB, & RRO Files
File name: Louisburg-SRG,Memo-Letter-Insp-Visit,2011-M03-D28.doc One
Construction Grants and Loans Section, 1633 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699.1633 NorthCarolliina
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone] / Internet: www.nccgl.net, DENR Customer Service 1-877-623-6748 Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer —50% Recycled/30% Post Consumer Paper

PROJECT NAME
PROJECT No.
LOU UP&, Edgewood Drive Sewer
E-SPS-T-00-0094
CONTACTS:
Owner: Mark Warren, Town Manager
Engineer: Steve Scruggs PE, Wayne Woodlief AECOM
Contractor: Mike Habig, Randy Garrett, DeVere Const.
CG&L: Tom S. Poe NC-DW CG&L Inspector
SRG GRANT AMOUNT: $ 2,295,500.00?
Original SRG Grant offer was dated 8/20/2002.
Edgewood Drive Sewer (Eligible Part) ............. $ 237,030.00
ENGINEER INFO:
2/14/201 I, Partial Engineers Certification #1 received & filed
3/9/2011, Partial Engineers Certification #2 received
3/25/2011, Partial Engineers Certification #3 received
Field notes, testing, and red line mark ups for As-builts are
being kept up to date.
CONTRACT INFO:
Original Contractor was Mainline Contracting Company, Inc,.
contract for eligible work was for $ 237,030.00. In September
2009 commenced bankruptcy proceedings and ceased
operations. The Bonding Company was The Hanover
Insurance Company of New Hampshire, and in 9/8/2010,
DeVere Construction Company took over to complete job
NOTE:
The Contractor has made much progress and is working hard
for completion.
CONTRACT TIME (Days, Dates):
Start Date(NTP)...................................................10/12/2010
Construction days (Substantial, Final) .....................180, 210
Completion dates (Sabstantial, Final) ....................8/16/2010
Days Elapsed as of 3/28/2011...........................................167
Per cent days used: ...................................................... 79.5%
Status: ................................................................. On Schedule
PROGRESS MEETINGS:
Pre -Construction conference to resume work was 9/28/2010
Progress meetings: (typically on 4m Monday at 10:00am)
Dates of Progress Meetings, Site visits, and Inspections
9/28/2010 (Re -Pre -Con) .... 1/3/2011 ........................................
10/25/2010 ......................1 /31 /2011........................................
11 /29/2010 ...................... 2/28/2011........................................
No Mtg. in Dec ................. 3/28/2011........................................
Next meeting is scheduled for 4/26/2011
CHANGE ORDER STATUS:
Change Order#1................................................. $ 13,107.83
And add 8 days for additional work at casing and bore at Main
Street Bridge, sent to USDA for approval, CG&L-SRG funds
notinvolved.
Progress Meeting, Construction
Inspection, & Photos 3/28/2011
SRG Eligible Work for Edgewood Drive Sewer
From CG&L letter dated 6/16/2009
1815 LF 8" Gravity Sewer
120 LF, 12" Gravity Sewer
18 Sanitary MH
14 service taps
390 LF 4" Service Line
Items Listed from the Contract Bid Sheets are on attached
spreadsheet
Edgewood Drive Sewer work includes following Parts
Pan I...................Sheet
13, 7.......
Staked, Materials Eqpt, ready
Part 2...................Sheet
13...........
Staked, Materials Eqpt. ready
Part 3...................Sheet
13...........
Staked, Materials Eqpt. ready
Part 4...................Sheet
13, 8.......
Staked
Pan 5...................Sheet
15, 7.......
Done, seed, straw
Bonner Ct ...........Sheet
13...........
Done, seed, straw
"Outfall",...........
Sheet 13, 7.......
Done, seed, straw
Rd. Crossing? .....Sheet
13,14......
In Progress
3/28/201 L . Photo was taken at end of line Pan 4 lrutkina
where Part 1 and Par 4 connect to the Tar River Interceptor
where it crosses Edgewood Drive with three deep MHs. MH
89+98 and MH 90+73 will be on the left, and MH 89+53 will
be on right in this photo. Much rock was encountered going
up the line to the left and was blasted.
ACTION ITEMS & NOTES:
• The CG&L Construction Inspection Checklist and SRO
requirements were reviewed.
• Edgewood Road Sewer Pipe and MH installation is more
that 50% completed.
• Plans and Contract being checked for exactly which MH
are included in the SRG part of the project, i.e MH where
Edgewood sections connect to Tar River Interceptor.
Filename: Louisburg-SRG,3-Foto-Report,2010-M03-D28.docx
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Internet: v .ncvvaterquality.org
Construction Grants and Loans Section, 1633 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1633
Main Phone: [phone] / Fax: [phone] / Internet: w .nccgl.net
Tom S. Poe, 919-715-6205, [e-mail]

—EOGEWOOD DRIVE SEVER - PART 3
SEE DRAWING NO. 1635D10u BnTcc.
I. ORIVEWAY F BIOENCE SHALL BE REPLACED WITH TEMPORARY DRIVE BY THE CONTRACTOR.
INCLUDE C OF TEMPORARY DRIVEWAY IN THE COST OF PIPE. WHEN PIPE INSTALLATION
--- --- — IS COMPL E. REPLACE WITH PERMANENT DRIVE. INCLUDE PRIDE FOR NEW DRIVE IN
BID IT NO. 321DI.
- 2. CRETE FLUME SHALL BE REPLACED. INCLUDE REPLACING THE FLUME IN BID ITEM NO. 3210I. 4 _ 3-RELINE DITCH WITH 150 S.Y. OF CLASS B RIP -NAP.
A. JUTE NUTTING TO BE PAID FOR UNDER BID !TEM 35111. $ z
- H�
MI STA. 0.00.00 IEDEWDRIVE SEWER - PART 21=
\� M STA. OW0.00 MEDGEMCOG ODO W
DRIVE SEWER - PART 31= g' k'B
AHSTA. 6N.92 (EDGEWOOp DRIVE TFALL SEWER)
4'
I M' CIA MANHOLE L €' N � 450 S.Y. JUTE NUTTixG ISEE NOTE NO. %) m $ 6$
WIN STA. 3+99.55 W A W
A - 20.23' 29- LT.
k-
` Z� <• OIA MANHOLE Jp@
10' CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT u =
EI''�yTi1 R
`� ZONE 1 6 EXISTING RIPARIAN BUFFER
LINE TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
WITH DOUBLE -SIDED COCONUT FIBER BLANKET �- ZONE 2 OF EXISTING RIPARIAN BUFFER
ADDITIONAL NOTE:
ZONE 1 OF THE EXISTING RIPARIAN BUFFER
SILT FENCE TO BE PAID FOR UNDER BID ITEM NO. 35(W) SMALL NOT BE DISTURBED.
H
-iSTF36 TD BE PAID FOR X/o Tp�� pPbY•-••.Nye
UNDER BID ITEM MD. 351DI
i•:�
6�A!
'M STA. OWOAO (EDGEMDOD DRIVE OUTFgL)=
�H STA. 93H50. 13 liaR RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWERI
B' OIA. MANHOLE _
W INTERIM DROP
LF OF 20' R 0.250' STEEL CASING
120 EE OF DI CA R PIPE
LIANTEEO cRMOSS1XG \\ AX o
N� % NI Q 4 9 z
ow o
EDGE WOOD DRIVE OUTFALL
1280
J 0
io 2
r
AN
mom
0mg
==cm
map-
pmwEiom_?sMOM
��i_��
g_���eaeeoo�°3�5iit—s��sseaa
8
=.$��®�i8®��ss�m���ua���
m
Wm
ss�Ws
saes®s
•
B �

Qty.
Units
Unit Cost
Total per item
EDGEWOOD DRIVE BID ITEMS:
25a
110
LF
30
32
$3,300.00
8" DIP 0-6' depth
8" DIP at 6-8' depth
25b
25
LF
$800.00
25c
50
LF
36
$1,800.00
8" DIP at 8-10' depth
25d
165
LF
40
$6,600,00
8" DIP at 10-12' depth
17
8" PVC 0-6' depth
26a
145
LF
$2,465.00
26b
640
LF
30
$19,200.00
8" PVC at 6-8' depth
26c
630
LF
32
$20,160.00
8" PVC at 8-10' depth
26d
50
LF
34
$1,700.00
8" PVC at 10-12' depth
26e
10
LF
36
$360.00
12" PVC at 14-16' depth
26f
25
LF
44
$1,10600
12" PVC at 16-18' depth
12" PVC at 18-20' depth _
12" PVC at 20-22' depth
26g
20
LF
73
96
$1,460.00
26h
35
LF
_ _
$3,360.00
26i
30
LF
125
$3,750.00
12" PVC at 22-24' depth
PRE CAST MAN HOLES
27a
1
Each
1200
$1,200.00
4' Diameter, 0-6' depth
27b
3
Each
1300
$3,900.00
4' Diameter, 6-8' depth
27c
6
Each
1600
1800
$9,600.00
4' Diameter, 8-30' depth
4' Diameter, 10-12' depth
27d
2
Each
$3,600.00
27e
1
Each
2100
$2,100.00
5' Diameter, 8-10' depth
27f
2
Each
2300
$4,600.00
5' Diameter, 10-12' depth
27g
1
Each
4000
80001
$4,000.00
6' Diameter, 14-16' depth
6' Diameter, 22-24' depth
27h
1
Each
$8,000.00
27i
1
Each
8000
$8,000.00
7' Diameter, 20-22' depth
Sub Total
18
28
120
Tons
25
275
$3,000.00
Extra Stone _
4" Sewer tap assembly
29
14
$3,850.00
30
390
LF
18
$7,020.00
4" Sewer Service pipping
31
360
Sq Yd
25
$9,06600
Rip Rap
32a
100
Sq Yd
53
$5,300.00
Cutting Replacing Pavement,
Roadways, and Driveways
32b
30
Sq Yd
5.5
$165.00
Gravel Driveways
32c
125
Sq Yd
47
$5,875.00
Cutting and Replacing Streets, w/ 8"
ABC compaction, patching and
repaving
32d
580
Sq Yd
61
$35,380.00
Street cut and Replace
32e
2050
Sq Yd
13
$26,650.00
Overlay
33
4
each
1500
7
$6,000.00
Compaction Tests _
Select Backfill
34
940
Cu Yd.
$6,580.00
35a
14
each
140
$1,960.00
Errosion Control -Check Dams
35b
1
each
400
$400.00
Errosion Control -Temp. Ded. Traps
35c
270
LF
6
$1,620.00
Temp Ditch
35d
2
each
16001
$3,200.00
_
Const Entrance

35e
600
LF
2
$1,200.00
Silt Fence
35f
1
each
96
61
$96.00
Inlet Protection
Outlet Stabilization
35g
1
each
$61.00
35h
1265
Sq Yd
2
$2,530.00
Jute Matting
35i
475
Sq Yd
2
$950.00
Netting w/ Straw
$231,892.00
SUB TOTAL
$237,030.00
SRG ELIGIBLE Contract Amt.
35j
1
Lump Sum
$5,138.00
Removal of Temp Sed. Control,
50% of 35a-35-f

Goo& Earth
- r
� P .
� C7 M[i {r i���•�
4 ♦ a.^
ItInw
.q F,• jQ ya Y. •i �.1 k',
7FF
v
h
.. • .. I � 1,

Louisburg-SRL, Edgewood: on Part 2, outfall. Part 3
Louisburg-SRL, Edgewood Part 2, toward Part 3
Louisburg-SRL. Edgewood: Part 4, Crossing, Part 1
Louisburg-SRL, Edgewood Bonner Court
3-28-2011, Louisburg-SRL, Edgewood: Part 5
Louisburg-SRL, EdgewoodPart 1. Crossing, Part 4

May 05 11 11:10a Louichurg Water Reclamati 9194962883 P.1
476aw
110 W. Nash St.
Louisburg, N.C. 27549s
[phone]
[phone] Fax
11II
October 14, 2010
NCDENR / DWQ/ CENTRAL FILES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Central Files,
Please find enclosed, the annual Effluent Pollutant Analysis for the Town of Louisburg Water Reclamtion
Facility for the year 2010.
Sincerely, ,�
Jimmy fin on / Louisburg WRF ORC

Oct 14 10 09:25a Louisburg Water Reclamati 91949R2883
P.1
110 W. Nash St. ( '
Louisburg, N.C. 27549 1�
[phone]
[phone] Fax
V�
Fa ET
TO: DAVE PARNELL / DWQ / FAX # [phone]
FROM: JIMMY ELLINGTON / LOUISBURG WWTP ORC
SUBJECT: ANNUAL PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
TOTAL PAGES INCLUDING COVER: SO
s&& q N"/A e
COMMENTS: DAVE, WILL ALSO BE MAILING A COPY TO CENTRAL FILES AS REQUIRED BY THE
PERMIT. JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE YOU RECEIVED A COPY TO AVOID ANY POSSIBLE
CONFUSION. FAX INCLUDES RESULTS AS WELL AS COC FORMS, PLEASE CALL WITH ANY
QUESTIONS OR IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES.

Oct 14 10 09:25a Lnr,i.sburg Water Reclamati 9194gG2883
p.2
o Page 1 of 4
IrnoTEST
Laboratory Report
ob Loco'ion R' ob LOCniion 'C' Lcb [ccobbn 'W
NCMNJ Cert.#: 067 NCfDW Cert.#: 37731 �ii NCANW Cert.#: 103 NC/DW Cert.#: 37733 NG1WW Cert.#: 075 NC1DW Cert.#: 37721
6701 Conference Dr, Raleigh. NC 27607 i�: 6300 Ramada Dr, Suite C2, Clemmons, NC 27012 6624 Gordon Rd, Unit G, Wilmington, NC 28411
PM [phone] Fax: [phone] Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone] Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Project No.: WASTEWATER
Project lD Priority Pollutant Analysis
— Prepared for —
RICHARD COLLINS
LOUISBURG WRF
110 WEST NASH STREET
LOUISBURG, NC 27549
Report Date: 10/412010
Date Received: 9/21/2010
Work Order #: 1009-01494
Cust. Code: L02677
Cust. P.O.#:
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
001 Composite 9121/2010 8:45 WW Composite 4+1-2 deg
Test Performed
Method
Results
Lab Loc D21VzedTme Qualifier
Ammonia
EPA 350.1
0.03 mg/L as N
R
9123110
8:45
Nitrate -Nitrite
EPA 353.2
0.90 mg/L as N
R
9130110
11:54
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
EPA 351.2
1.12 mg/L
R
9129/10
13:57
Total Phosphorus
EPA 365.4
<0.05 mg1L
R
9129110
10:11
Total Dissolved Solids
SM 2540C
274 mg/L
R
9127110
8:02
Lead
EPA 200.8
<0.005 mg/L
R
9123110
17:19
Antimony
EPA 200.8
<0.003 mg/L
R
9123110
17:19
Arsenic
EPA 200.8
<0.005 mg/L
R
9/23110
17:19
Beryllium
EPA 200.8
<0.002 mg1L
R
9/23110
17:19
Cadmium
EPA 200.8
<0.005 mg/L
R
9123110
17:19
Chromium
EPA 200.8
<0.010 mg/L
R
9123110
17:19
Copper
EPA 200.8
<0.010 mg/L
R
9/23/10
17:19
Nickel
EPA 200.8
<0.010 mg1L
R
9/23/10
17:19
Selenium
EPA 200.8
<0.002 mg/L
R
9/23110
17:19
Silver
EPA 200.8
<0.010 mg/L
R
9123/10
17:19
Thallium
EPA 200.8
<0.001 mg1L
R
91231l0
17:19
Zinc
EPA 200.8
0.074 mg/L
R
9123110
17:19
TOTAL HARDNESS (WW)
R
0:00
Calcium
EPA 200.8
9.98 mg/L
R
9/23110
13:43
Magnesium
EPA 200.8
2.44 mg/L
R
9123110
13:43
Total Hardness Calculation
CALC.
34.9 mg/L
R
9123110
13:43
Phenols
Lachat 10-210-00-1-A
<5.0 ug1L
R
9124110
9:20
Semivolatile TTOs by 625
EPA 625
R
9/21/10
14:00
Acenaphthylene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9121110
14:00
Acenaphthene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9121110
14:00
Anthracene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9/21110
14:00
Benzidine
EPA 625
<50 ug/L
R
9/21110
14:00
Benzo(a)anthracene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9/21110
14:00
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9/21110
14:00
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9/21/10
14:00
Benzo(a)pyrene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L-
R
9121110
14:00
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9121/10
14:00

Oct 14 10 09:25a 1--islourg Water Reclamati 912A�92883
0
a
MI TE ST
6701 Conference Drive
Raleigh, NO 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
P.3
Page 2 of 4
NC/VW Cent. #: 067
NCIDW Cert.#: 37731
Work Order#: 1009-01494
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
001 Composite 9/21/2010 8:45 WW Composite 4+1-2deg C
Test Performed
Method
Results
Lab Loc
n I zed ----
ADaj� Tim-e Qualifier
Benzyl butyl phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/E
R
9/21110
14:00
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9/21110
14:00
Bis(2chloroethoxy)methane
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9121/10
14:00
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9121110
14:00
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9121110
14:00
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9/21/10
14:00
2-Chloronaphthalene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9/21110
14:00
4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
EPA 625
<10ug/L
R
9/21110
14:00
2-Chlorophenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9121110
14:00
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
EPA 625
<10 uglL
R
9121/10
14:00
Chrysene
EPA 625
<10 uglL
R
9121110
14:00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9/21110
14:00
Di-n-butyl phthalate
EPA 625
<10 uglL
R
9121110
14:00
3,3'.Dichlorobenzidine
EPA 625
<20 uglL
R
9/21110
14:00
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9121/10
14:00
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9121/10
14:00
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9121/10
14:00
2,4-Dichlorophenol
EPA 625
<10 uglL
R
9121110
14:00
Diethyl phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
Id
9/21110
14:00
2,4-Dimethylphenol
EPA 625
<10 ug1L
R
9121110
14:00
Dimethyl phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9/21/10
14:00
2,4-Dinitrophenol
EPA 625
<50 ug/L
R
9121110
14:00
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9121110
14:00
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9121/10
14:00
Di-noctyl phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9/21110
14:00
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9/21110
14:00
Fluoranthene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9121/10
14:00
Fluorene
EPA 625
<10ug/L
R
9/21/10
14:00
Hexachlorobenzene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9121/10
14:00
Hexachlorobutadiene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9121110
14:00
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9121110
14:00
Hexachloroethane
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9121110
14:00
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
EPA 625
<10 uglL
R
9121110
14:00
Isophorone
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9121110
14:00
2.Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
EPA 625
<50 ug/L
R
9121/10
14:00
Naphthalene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9121110
14:00
Nitrobenzene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9/21110
14:00
2-Nitrophenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9121110
14:00
4-Nitrophenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
9/21/10
14:00
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
EPA 625
<10 ug1L
R
9121/10
14:00
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
EPA 625
<20 ug/L
R
9121110
14:00

Oct 14 10 09:26a I — isburg Water Reclamati 919A��2883
0
O
UQoTEST
6701 Conference Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
Work Order #: 1009-01494
p.4
Page 3 of 4
NCIW W Cart. #: 067
NCIDW Cart #: 37731
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
001 Composite 9121/2010 8:45 WW Composite 4+1-2deg C
Test Performed
Method
Results
Lab Loc N.VzodTime Qualifier
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
EPA 625
<20ug/L
R 9/21/10
14:00
Pentachlorophenol
EPA 625
<30 ugIL
R 9/21110
14:00
Phenanthrene
EPA 625
<10 ugIL
R 9121/10
14:00
Phenol
EPA 625
<10 ugIL
R 9/21110
14:00
Pyrene
EPA 625
<10 ugIL
R 9/21110
14:00
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
EPA 625
<20 ugIL
R 9121/10
14:00
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R 9121110
14:00
No. Sample ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled Matrix
Sample Type
Condition
002 Grab
9/21/2010
8:45 WW
Grab
4 +/- 2 deg C
Test Performed
Method
Results
Lali Loc
DajVzedTime Qualifier
Cyanide
LQC10-204-00.1-X
<0.005 mg/L
R
9/28110
13:10
Oil & Grease
EPA 1664A
<5.0 mg/L
R
9/20110
12:00
Volatile TTOs by GCIMS
EPA 624
R
9123/10
8:38
Acrolein
EPA 624
<50 ug/L
R
9123110
8:38
Acrylonitrile
EPA 624
<50 ug/L
R
9123110
8:38
Benzene
EPA 624
<5 ugIL
R
9123110
8:38
Bromodichloromethane
EPA 624
<5 ugIL
R
9/23/10
8:38
Bromoform
EPA 624
<5 ugIL
R
9/23/10
8:38
Bromomethane
EPA 624
<10 ug/L
R
9123/10
8:38
Carbon tetrachloride
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
9123110
8:38
Chlorobenzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
9123110
8:38
Chloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ugIL
R
9/23110
8:38
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
EPA 624
<10 ugIL
R
9123110
8:38
Chloroform
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
9123110
8:38
Chloromethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
9/23110
8:38
Dibromochloromethane
EPA 624
<5 ugIL
R
9123110
8:38
1,1-Dichloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
9/23110
8:38
1,2.Dichloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
9123110
8:38
1,1-Dichloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ugIL
R
9123110
8:38
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ugIL
R
9123/10
8:38
1,2-Dichloropropane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
9123110
8:38
cis-1,3.Dichloropropene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
9/23110
8:38
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
9/23/10
8:38
Ethylbenzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
9/23110
8:38
Methylene chloride
EPA 624
<5 ugIL
R
9123110
8:38
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
EPA 624
<5ug/L
R
9/23110
8:38
Tetrachloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ugIL
R
9123/10
8:38
Toluene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
9123110
8:38

Oct 14 10 09:26a 1--isburg Water Reclamati 91S 12883
P.5
TG�oTEST
6701 Conference Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
Work Order #: 1009-01494
Page 4of4
NCANW Cert. #: 067
NCIDW Cert. #: 37731
No.
Sample ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled
Matrix
Sample Type
Condition
002
Grab
9/2112010
8:45
WW
Grab
4+/-2deg C
M I zed —_--
Test Performed Method Results Lab Loc oaf Time Qualifier
1,1,1_Trichloroethane
EPA 624
<70 ug/L
R 9/23/10
8:38
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug1L
R 9123110
8:38
Trichloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R 9/23/10
8:38
Vinyl chloride
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R 9/23110
8:38
Reviewed by:
Zx
A ell
for Tritest, Inc.

IrI;:Z.nT$_=ST Chain of Custody Tritest W.O.#:
�y
6701 Conference Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607 ndard Report Delivery
ph: [phone] fax: [phone] Rush Report Delivery (wl surcharge)
rD NCWW Carl #67, NCDW Cert#37731 Note: Rush projects are subject to prior approval by Lab
tt Page t of 1 Requested Due Date:
Report Results To: Bill Results To: IIIIIII IIIII IIIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III
LOUISBURG WRF TOWN of LOUISBURG
110 WEST NASH STREET 110 WEST NASH STREET
LOUISBURG, NC 27549 LOUISBURG, NC 27549 Project Reference: Priority Pollutant Analysis
M
m
m
n.
u
c
a
m
m
4J
IQ
0
m
L
al
4J
N
3
L
L
7
N
J
N
to
N
0
O
0
V
u
0
Attn: RICHARD COLLINS
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attn: SEAN MEDLIN
Project Number:
WASTEWATER
Purchase Order #:
Sampled By:
Sample Description
Composite
Start Date
Stop Date
Matrix
Analyses Requested
Smp#
or G ab
Start Time
Stop Time
oX
vsw.
GW eta
Composite
C
d l d
/p4
WW
Ammonia, Nitrate -Nitrite, Total Kjeldahl.Nitrogen. Total Phosphorus, Total
001
ogaa
t79
QQS
Dissolved Solids, Lead, Antimony, Arsenic, Beryllium, Cadmium,
Chromium, Copper, Nickel, Selenium, Sliver, Thallium, Zinc, TOTAL
HARDNESS (WW), Calcium, Magnesium, Phenols,
Semivolalile TTOs by 625, Metals Prep, Alkali Metals Prep
Grab
G
09
WW
Cyanide, Oil & Grease, Volatile TTOs by GC/MS
002
e inqu y (st a ure)
Received by slgnaturer-
Date
Time
For Lab Use n y:
II/D 1
`i O
Temperatue at receipt:
Relin bgnature)
Received by (sign
Date
Time
4±2C
Relinquish d by
Received by (sig ur6r
Date
Time
Temp: C

Oct 14 10 09:26a I— isburg Water Reclamati SJPA062883 p.7
O
O
7ROOTE ST
SAMPLE
PRESERVATION CHECK -IN SHEET
WOx:
1� ja s -v/
Chmked in by.
Date:
Temp:
elcW
Roam
CD
I TTSMM
USM
I FEDX
I GC
I UPS
Sample
No.
Analysis Requested
Sample
Type
Comp/
Grab
Container
Chlorine
Preservative
None
HCL
HZS07
HNO3
NsOH
Thio
OTHER
I
/ P
G
Pos /
None
HCL
04
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
j
I
Posln
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
`
S
/ G
Pos / g
None
HCL
H2SO4
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
P /
Pos / eg
None
HCL
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
6/G
P/
Pos / egNone
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
R
tj
/G
Pos / eg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
Thio
�R
6-
P /0
Pos / eg
None
HCL
HNO3
NaOH
Thin
OTHER
P /
Pos / JgNone
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thin
OTHER
P/G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thin
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thin
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos! neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
COMMENTS:
�G i

Oct 14 10 09:27a L^^'.sburg Water Reclamati 919^r`92883 P.8
o Page 1 of 1
IrROBTEST
Laboratory Report
Lab Locobon W' Lab Locolion 'C' Lob Loccboa 'W
NCANW Cart.#: 067 NCIDW Cart.#: 37731 r NCANW Cart.#: 103 NCIDW Cart.#: 37733 NC/WW Cart.#: 075 NCIDW Can.#: 37721
6701 Conference Dr, Raleigh, NC 27607 6300 Ramada Dr, Suite C2, Clemmons, NC 27012 6624 Gordon Rd, Unit G, Wilmington, NG 28411
Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone] Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone] Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Project No.: WASTEWATER
Project ID: Low Level Mercury
-- Prepared for --
RICHARD COLLINS
LOUISBURG WRF
110 WEST NASH STREET
LOUISBURG, NC 27549
Report Date: 101412010
Date Received: 9/24/2010
Work Order #1009-01849
Cust. Code: L02677
Cust. P.O.#:
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
001 Effluent 9/24/2010 12:35 WW Grab Ambient
Test Performed Method Results lab Loc pa ZedTime Qualifier
Low Level Mercury EPA 1631 <1.0 nglL R 9/30110 6:42
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
002 Field Blank 9/24/2010 12:40 OT Grab Ambient
Test Performed Method Results Lab Loc DaftzedTme Qualifier
Low Level Mercury EPA 1631 <1.0 ng/L R 9130110 6:42
Reviewed by:
for Tritest, Inc.

Oct 14 10 09:27a I- isburg Water Reclalnati 91P"n`�2883 P.9
TRiTE15T
Chain of Custody
J 6701 Conference Drive. Raleigh, NC 27607
ph: [phone], fax: [phone]
NCW W Cert#67. NCDW Cert#37731
J 6624 Gordon Road. Unit G. Wilmington, NC 28411
ph: [phone], fax [phone]
NCWW Cerl#75, NCDW Cenl#37721
J 6300 Ramada Dr.. Suite C2, Clemmons, NC 27012
ph:[phone]. fax:[phone]
NCWW Cert#103. NCDW Cert#37733
Report Results To:
Company Or/J U!4'C U-ff
Address:
Attn:
Phone:
Sampled by (signatu
Bill To:
Tritest W.O. # / G i) 'Vt O
Project Reference:
Project Number:
Purchase Order #:
:1 Standard Report Delivery
❑ Rush Report Delivery (tvrsurcharge)
--Rush projects are subject to prior approval by
the laboratory
Requested Due Date:
Sample Description
c.,"war
Start Date
End Date
Matrix
ww, on, swr
sni..e.
Analyses Requested
Trnea
Sample*
Start Time
End Timecvx
�
-1.4
W
L
G
o
Reli b (si natu
Received by ( at )
Da a
Time
Relinquished by (signature)
Received by (signature)
'Daler
Time
Relinquished by (signature)
Received by (signature)
Date
Time
Receipt Conditions (Labr�l,J�pa nn1y)
❑ 4t2`C emp: C
Res. Chlpine:
❑ Absent L) Present ❑ nla
Acid preserv. <27
❑Yes DNo 7Na
Base pmsem >127
G Yes ❑ No 7 n/a

Oct 14 10 09:27a L—'sburg Water Reclamati 918'r`2883 p.10
I O
O
7 MOnTEST
SAMPLE PRESERVATION CHECK -IN SHEET
WON:
G% — Ot
Checked in by:
Date:
_ 4,�d
Time{(Yz
Temp:
v
RouIG
CD
TTS
471USM
I FEDX I GC
UPS
Sample I
No.
Analysis Requested
Sample
Type
Comp/
Grab
Container
Chlorine
Preservative
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thin
OTHER
C
I A i
Wd ✓/
C l
n
NoneTHI,
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
Z
C / G
P
Al
Pos / n g
Nona
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pas /
None
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pas / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pas / neg
Noce
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
PIG
Pas / neg
Noce
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pas / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pas / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pas / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pas / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pas / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C 1 G
P / G
Pas / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pas / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pas / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C )G
P / G
Pas / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pas / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pas / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pas / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pas / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pas / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
COMMENTS:

SEP-23-2010 09:51 TOWN OF LOUISBURG 919 496 6319 P.05
September 22, 2010
Point Source Branch
Surface Water Protection Section
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Delegation of Signature Authority
Louisburg WWTP
NPDES No. NCO020231
To Whom It May Concern:
By notice of this letter, I hereby delegate signatory authority to each of the following
individuals for all permit applications, discharge monitoring reports, and other
information relating to the operations at the Louisburg WWTP as required by all
applicable federal, state, and local environmental agencies specifically with the
requirements for signatory authority as specified in 15A NCAC 2B.050&
Jimmy Ellin on Louisburg WWTP ORC
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel fzee to contact me at (919)496-
3406.
Sincerely,
Ave
Mark R Warren
Louisburg Town Administrator
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Surface Water Protection Section
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
SEP 21 2010
I
TOTAL P.05

Louisburg Wastewater Treatment Plant
Performance Annual Report
July 1, 2009 — June 30, 2010 JUL 3 0 2010
I. General Information
Facility Name: Louisburg Wastewater Treatment Plant
Responsible Entity: Town of Louisburg
Person in Charge/Contact: Jimmy Ellington, Plant Superintendent 919-496-2677
Applicable Permits: NPDES Permit No. NCO020231 (Wastewater Discharge)
General Permit No. NC G110000 (Stormwater Discharge)
Treatment Process Description
The Louisburg W WTP is an extended aeration system with a permitted treatment
capacity of 1,370,000 gallons per day. It consists of influent screening and grit /grease
removal, an anaerobic mixing zone, two oxidation ditches, two secondary clarifiers, three
tertiary filters, ultraviolet disinfection, cascade aeration and two aerobic digesters.
II. Performance
The Louisburg W WTP facility was compliant throughout the entire twelve month period
with no violations. The facility operated well within design efficiency with some
mechanical breakdowns, but all malfunctions were corrected as needed.
The table below shows plant performance in relationship with NPDES permit limits.
LOUISGURG WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EFFLUENT (DISCHARGE WATER) ANALYSIS
Parameter Summer Winter
NPDES Limits
Actual Values
Averse
NPDES Limits
Actual Values
Average
H
6.0 to 9.0 s.u.
6.72-8.36 s.u.
6.0 to 9.0 s.u.
6.41-7.49 s.u.
CBODS 200 C
8.0 mg/L
2.0mg/I
16.0 mg/L
2.02mg/I
Ammonia
Nitrogen
3.0 mg/L
0.19mg/1
6.0 mg/L
0.23mg/I
Total
Suspended
Residue
30 mg/L
3.07mg/I
30 mg/L
6.47mg/I
Fecal Coliform
200/100 ml
14.22/100ml
200/100 ml
28.57/100m1
Dissolved
Oxygen
5.0 mg/L
minimum
7.47mg/I
5.0 mg/L
minimum
9.63mg/I
Flow
1.37 MGD
0.462MGD
1.37 MGD
0.581MGD

III. Notification
This report will be published in the Franklin Times Newspaper.
IV. Certification
I certify under penalty of law that this report is complete and accurate to the best of my
knowled e. I further certify that this report has been made available to the users or
custom of the named system and that those users have been notified of its availability.
7*-* 0�a
J' llington Date
Town of Louisburg
JUL 3 0 7f11f1

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director
Secretary
July 12, 2009
To: Ron Berry
From: Dave Parnell
Subject: Louisburg Wastewater Treatment Plant
NPDES Permit: NCO020231
Permittee Contact: Mayor Karl Pernell, Town of Louisburg
110 W. Nash Street
Louisburg, NC 27549
Ron:
I have reviewed the file and spoken with Vick Webb, who recently (11.18.08) inspected the
above referenced facility. Please be advised of the following comments to the permittee,
based on findings during the inspection:
The 1.37 MGD wastewater treatment plant consists of the following components:
mechanical barscreen, aerated grit/grease removal, anaerobic selector, dual oxidation
ditches (BioDeNioPho Process), dual secondary clarifiers, three cell tertiary filter,
ultraviolet disinfection, sludge thickener, aerobic digester, and ultrasonic flow meter.
Update the plant description for the permit to include the cascade aeration.
2. Update the Raleigh Regional Office on the status of the installation of proposed new
equipment, consisting of: mechanical barscreen, septic tank hauler receiving station,
spare digester ejector pump, portable self priming pump, influent and effluent
refrigerated samplers, sludge thickener pumps, clarifier effluent trough cover plates, as
well as replacing the mixers in the oxidation ditch
Please be advised of these comments from the Raleigh Regional Office during future permit
review processes.
Signature Report Prep
Signature of Regional
Cc: RRO files NorthCarolina
Natur"Ib"
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: w .ncwaterquality.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10 % Post Consumer Paper

Louisburg Wastewater Treatment Plant
Performance Annual Report
July 1, 2008 —June 30, 2009
I. General Information
Facility Name: Louisburg Wastewater Treatment Plant
Responsible Entity: Town of Louisburg
Person in Charge/Contact: Jimmy Ellington, Plant Superintendent 919-496-2677
Applicable Permits: NPDES Permit No. NC0020231 (Wastewater Discharge)
General Permit No. NC G110000 (Stormwater Discharge)
Treatment Process Description
The Louisburg W WTP is an extended aeration system with a permitted treatment
capacity of 1,370,000 gallons per day. It consists of influent screening and grit /grease
removal, an anaerobic mixing zone, two oxidation ditches, two secondary clarifiers, three
tertiary filters, ultraviolet disinfection, cascade aeration and two aerobic digesters.
II. Performance
The Louisburg W WTP facility was compliant throughout the entire twelve month period
with no violations. The facility operated well within design efficiency with some
mechanical breakdowns, but all malfunctions were corrected as needed.
The table below shows plant performance in relationship with NPDES permit limits.
LOUISGURG WASTEWATER TREATMENTPLANT
EFFLUENT (DISCHARGE WATER) ANALYSIS
Parameter Summer Winter
NPDES Limits
Actual Values
Average
NPDES Limits
Actual Values
Average
H
6.0 to 9.0 s.u.
6.7-7.95 s.u.
6.0 to 9.0 s.u.
6.62-7.12 s.u.
CBOD5 200 C
8.0 mg/L
2.03mg/l
16.0 mg/L
2.02mg/1
Ammonia
Nitrogen
3.0 mg/L
0.24mg/1
6.0 mg/L
0.19mg/1
Total
Suspended
Residue
30 mg/L
4.86mg/l
30 mg/L
5.23mg/l
Fecal Coliform
200/100 ml
22.61/100m1
200/100 ml
9.68/100ml
Dissolved
en
5.0 mg/L
minimum
7.64mg/1
5.0 mg/L
minimum
9.53mg/l
Flow
1.37 MGD
0.586MGD
1.37 MGD
0.6073MGD
II II 2009

III. Notification
This report will be published in the Franklin Times Newspaper.
IV. Certification
I certify under penalty of law that this report is complete and accurate to the best of my
knowledge. I further certify that this report has been made available to the users or
customers 9f the named system and that those users have been notified of its availability.
Jimmy Vpgton Date
WWTIF&Wrintcndent
Town of Louisburg

Jun 24 10 11:OOa Louiahurg Water Reclamati 9194962883 p.1
%uric 4 1'oui4.Gu�
110 W. Nash St.
Louisburg, N.C. 27549
[phone]
[phone] Fax
April 1S, 2009
NCDENR/DWQ/CENTRAL FILES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Central Files,
III �i L
►il �
Please find enclosed, the annual Effluent Pollutant Analysis for the Town of
Louisburg Water Reclamation Facility for the year 2009.
Since
Louisburg WRF ORC

Jun 24 10 11:00a Louisburg Water Reclamati 9194962883
p.2
o Page 1 of 4
-?�LFM
Laboratory Report
Lob Lo'ahon'R' 16locolion V Cob Locobon'W'
NC/WW Cert#: 067 NGDW Cart.#: 37731 NC/NW Cert.#: 103 NC/DW Cert.#: 37733 NC/WW Cert#: 075 NC/DW Cert.#: 37721
6701 Conference Dr, Raleigh, NC 27607 l:!. 6300 Ramada Dr, Suite C2, Clemmons, NC 27012 6624 Gordon Rd, Unit G. Wilmington, NC 28411
Ph: (919) 8344984 Fax: [phone] Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone] Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Project No.: WASTEWATER
Project ID: Priority Pollutant Analysis
--- Prepared for ---
RICHARD COLLINS
LOUISBURG WRF
110 WEST NASH STREET
LOUISBURG, NC 27549
Report Date: 4/8/2009
Date Received: 3/2612009
Work Order #: 0902-00053
Cost. Code: L02677
Cust. P.O.#:
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
001 Composite 3126/2009 9:00 WW Composite 4+1-2deg C
Test Performed
Method
Results
E.FEOG- DaftzedTime Qualifier
Ammonia
EPA 350.1
0.06 mg/L as N
R
4/2109
11:15
Nitrate -Nitrite
EPA 353.2
0.33 mg/L as N
R
3131109
12:39
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
EPA 351.2
1.60 mg/L
R
4/3109
17:02
Total Phosphorus
EPA 365.4
<0.05 mg/L
R
413109
14:13
Total Dissolved Solids
SM 2540C
209 mg/L
R
3127109
14:25
Lead
EPA 200.8
<0.005 mg/L
R
417109
11:63
Antimony
EPA 200.8
<0.003 mg/L
R
417109
11:53
Arsenic
EPA 200.8
<0.005 mg/L
R
4/7109
11:53
Beryllium
EPA 200.8
<0.002 mg/L
R
417109
11:53
Cadmium
EPA 200.8
<0.005 mg/L
R
417109
11:53
Chromium
EPA 200.8
<0.010 mg/L
R
4/7109
11:53
Copper
EPA 200.8
<0.010 mg/L
R
417/09
11:53
Nickel
EPA 200.8
<0.010 mg/L
R
417/09
11:53
Selenium
EPA 200.8
<0.002 mg/L
R
4/7/09
11:53
Silver
EPA 200.8
<0.010 mg/L
R
4/7109
11:53
Thallium
EPA 200.8
<0.001 mg/L
R
417/09
11:53
Zinc
EPA 200.8
0.067 mg1L
R
4P7109
11:53
TOTAL HARDNESS (WW)
R
0:00
Calcium
EPA 200.8
11.2 mg1L
R
4/6/09
9:47
Magnesium
EPA 200.8
1.84 mg/L
R
4/6109
9:47
Total Hardness Calculation
CALC.
35.6 mg/L
R
416/09
9:47
Phenols w/chloroform extr.
EPA 420.1
12.2 ug/L
R
3/31109
13:00
Semivolatile TTOs by 625
EPA 625
R
3/30/09
14:00
Acenaphthylene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130/09
14:00
Acenaphthene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3/30/09
14:00
Anthracene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3/30/09
14:00
Benzidine
EPA 625
<50 ug1L
R
3130/09
14:00
Benzo(a)anthracene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3/30/09
14:00
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130/09
14:00
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
EPA 625
<10 uglL
R
3130109
14:00
Senzo(a)pyrene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130109
14:00
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
EPA 625
410 ug1L
R
3/30/09
14:00

Jun 24 10 11:00a Louisburg Water Reclamati 9194962883
0
0
oTEST
6701 Conference Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone' [phone]
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
p.3
Page 2 of 4
NCf W W Cert. #: 067
NC/DW CerL #: 37731
Work Order #: 0902-00053
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
001 Composite 3/2612009 9:00 WW Composite 4+/-2deg C
Test Performed
Method
Results
Lab Loc 6ajVzed Time Qualifier
Benzyl butyl phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130/09
14.00
Sis(2-chloroelhyl)ether
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130/09
14:00
Bis(2chloroethoxy)m ethane
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3/30/09
14:00
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
EPA 625
<10 ugfL
R
3/30/09
14:00
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3/30/09
14:00
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3/30/09
14:00
2-Chloronaphthalene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130/09
14:00
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130109
14:00
2-Chlorophenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3/30/09
14:00
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130/09
14:00
Chrysene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3/30/09
14:00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3/30/09
14:00
Di-n-butyl phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130109
14:00
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
EPA 625
<20 ug/L
R
3/30/09
14:00
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3/30/09
14:00
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130109
14:00
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130109
14:00
2,4-Dichlorophenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130/09
14:00
Diethyl phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130109
14:00
2,4-Dimethylphenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130109
14:00
Dimethyl phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130109
14:00
2,4-Dinitrophenol
EPA 625
<50 ug/L
R
3130109
14:00
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130109
14:00
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3/30/09
14:00
Di-noctyl phthalate
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3/30/09
14:00
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3/30/09
14:00
Fluoranthene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3/30109
14:00
Fluorene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3/30/09
14:00
Hexachlorobenzene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130109
14:00
Hexachlorobutadiene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130109
14:00
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130109
14:00
Hexachloroethane
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130109
14:00
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3/30/09
14:00
Isophorone
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130109
14:00
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
EPA 625
<50 ug/L
R
3130109
14:00
Naphthalene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3/30109
14:00
Nitrobenzene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130109
14:00
2-Nitrophenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130109
14:D0
4-Nitrophenol
EPA 625
<10 uglL
R
3130109
14:00
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
MOM
14:00
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
EPA 625
<20 ug/L
R
3130/09
14:00

Jun 24 10 11:00a Lou!-`'jrg Water Reclamati 919496'003
0
0
:�JTEST
6701 Conference Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
p.4
Page 3 of 4
NC/WW Cart. #: 067
NC/DW Cert. #: 37731
Work Order #: 0902-00053
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
001 Composite 3/2612009 9:00 WW Composite 4 +/- 2 deg C
Test Performed
Method
Results
lab Loc UaIVzo'— me Qualifier
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
EPA 625
<20 ui/L
R
3/30109
14:00
Pentachlorophenol
EPA 625
<30 ug/L
R
3130109
14:00
Phenanthrene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130109
14:00
Phenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130/09
14:00
Pyrene
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130/09
14:00
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
EPA 625
<20 ug/L
R
3130/09
14:00
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
EPA 625
<10 ug/L
R
3130/09
14:00
No. Sample ID Dale Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
002 Grab 3126/2009 9:00 WW Grab 4 +/- 2 deg C
Test Performed
Method
Results
Lab Lo'c •PaTime a��ed Qualifier
Cyanide
LQC10-204-00-1-X
<0.005 mglL
R
3/31109
15:05
Oil 6 Grease
EPA 1664A
9.6 mg/L
R
3126/09
8:00
Volatile TTOs by GC/MS
EPA 624
R
4/1109
10:54
Acrolein
EPA 624
<50ugIL
R
411/09
10:54
Acrylonitrile
EPA 624
<50 ug/L
R
411/09
10:54
Benzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
4/1109
10:64
Bromodichloromethane
EPA 624
<5ug/L
R
4/1109
10:54
Bromoform
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
4/1109
10:54
Bromomethane
EPA 624
<10 ug/L
R
411/09
10:54
Carbon tetrachloride
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
411109
10:54
Chlorobenzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
4/1109
10:54
Chloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
4/1109
10:54
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
EPA 624
<10 ug/L
R
411109
10:54
Chloroform
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
4/1109
10:54
Chloromethane
EPA 624
<5 ug1L
R
411109
10:54
Dibromochloromethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
4/1109
10:54
1,1-Dichloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
411109
10:54
1,2-Dichloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
4/1109
10:54
1,1-Dichloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
411109
10:54
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
411109
10:54
1,2-Dichloropropane
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
411/09
10:54
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
411109
10:54
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
4/1109
10:54
Ethylbenzene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
4/1109
10:54
Methylene chloride
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
4/1109
10:54
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
EPA 624
<5ug/L
R
411/09
10:54
Tetrachloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ugiL
R
411109
10:54
Toluene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
411109
10:54

Jun 24 10 11:00a Louisburg Water Reclamati 9194962SR3
0
0
C�DTEST
6701 Conference Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
Telephone: [phone]
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
Work Order #: 0902-00053
P.5
Page 4 of 4
NC" Cart. #: 067
NC/DW Cent. #: 37731
No.
Sample ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled
Matrix
Sample Type
Condition
002
Grab
3/26/2009
9:00
WW
Grab
4+/_ 2 deg C
Test Performed Method Results UaLc 16&zedTime Qualifier
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
EPA 624
<10 ug/L
R
411/09
10:54
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
EPA 624
<5 ug1L
R
411/09
10:54
Trichloroethene
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
411/09
10:54
Vinyl chloride
EPA 624
<5 ug/L
R
4/1/09
10:54
Reviewed by:
for Tritest, I nc

Trit st w.o. a 0902-00053 Page 1 of 1
6701 Conference Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607 13standard Report Delivery
(919) 634-49fax: (919) 83
NCW W Cert #87, NCDW Cert # 37731 Chain of Custody ❑ Rush Report Delivery (w/ surcharge)
0- NC7731 Note: Rush projects are subject to prior approval by Lab
Requested Due Date:
Report Results To: Bill Results To:
LOUISBURG WRF LOUISBURG TOWN HALL Project Reference: Priority Pollutant Analysis
110 WEST NASH STREET 110 WEST NASH STREET project Number: WASTEWATER
LOUISBURG, NC 27549 LOUISBURG, NC 27549
40
m
E
M
0
rb
of
L
m
♦a
N
3
U
L
7
A2
N
7
c
J
Attn: RICHARD COLLINS
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attn: RICHARD COLLINS
Purchase Order #:
Sampled By:
Sample Description
Corrpoaite
a a e
op ate
Matrix
na ysls eques e
Start Time
Stop Time
or Grab
_
SW, ow,
sw cw etc '
Smp #
Composite
C
93 0
3
W W
Ammonia, Nitrate -Nitrite, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Total Phosphorus, Total
001
Dissolved Solids, Lead, Antimony, Arsenic, Beryllium, Cadmium,
Oy 16
Chromium, Copper, Nickel, Selenium, Silver, Thallium, Zinc, TOTAL
HARDNESS (WW), Calcium, M gnesium etals Prep,
Alkali Metals Prep 6 S
Grab
G
3
WW
Cyanide, Oil & Grease, Volatile TTOs b GC/MS
002
DAMA
e mquisry y sig%m)
Race
e /+
Ti
For Lab Use Only:
lX�
Temperatue at receipt:
Relinquished by (Sig
Re i d by ( n r
to
7
Time r `�(
3� (J
��Ci
4±2 C
Relinquished by (sig ure
Received by(signature)
Date
Time
Temp: C

Jun 24 10 11:01a Loui-hurg Water Reclamati 919496�093 p,7
O
O
7ROOTEST
SAMPLE
PRESERVATION CHECK -IN SHEET
WO#:
a -duos
Chcokod in by:
Date:
a9
Time;
Temp:
d
Route:
CD
TIS
USM
FEDJC
GC
UPS
Sample
No.
Analysis Requested
Sample
Type
Comp!
Grab
Container
Chlorine
Preservative
Noae
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
Na0H
Thio
OTHER
1
1/ 7
J
/ G
/ G
Pos / ne
one
HCL
H2
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
'
/
/ G
/ G
Pos / of
None
HCL
04
HNO3
NaOH
Tbio
OTHER
*�
/ G
G
Pos / n
ne
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
J
/ G
/ G
Pos / n
None
HCL
H2SO4
3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
�a !
/ G
I P /
Pos / n
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
O
f
/ G
P /
Pos / n
None
HCL
H2
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
Z
GCS
C /
/ G
Pos / n
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
N
Thio
O R
`Z
06-
C l
PIT
Pos / n
None
HCL
H2
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
Z
C /
P /
Pos / n
g
None
H L
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
F7SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Tl io
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2304
14NO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
No
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Tbio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos /neg
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C/G
P/G
Pos / neg
L
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
COMMENTS:

Jun 24 10 11:01a Louisburg Water Reclamati 91949UPP93
P.8
0
o Page 1 of 1
VQaTEST
Laboratory Report
Lab LaccGon'R' u Cab (ocotW 'C' lob Localidn'W'
NCA%W Cert.#: 067 NC/DW Cert.#: 37731 NCNOW Cart.#; 103 NC/DW Cert.#: 37733 NC/1NW Cert.#: 075 NC/UW Cert.#: 37721
6701 Conference Dr, Raleigh, NC 27607 6300 Ramada Do Suite C2, Clemmons, NC 27012 6624 Gordon Rd, unit G, Wilmington, NC 28411
Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone] Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone] Ph: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Project No.: WASTEWATER Report Date: 3/31/2009
Project ID. Low Level Mercury Date Received: 3/3012009
--- Prepared for --
RICHARD COLLINS
LOUISBURG WRF Work Order#: 0902-00052
110 WEST NASH STREET Gust. Code: L02677
LOUISBURG, NC 27549 Cust. P.O.#:
No. SampfeID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
001 Effluent 3/30/2009 11:00 WW Grab Ambient
Test Performed
Method
Results
lab Lc- Da&zedTime Qualifier
Low Level Mercury
EPA 1631
4.29 ng1L
R 3/31109 6:29
No. Sample ID Date Sampled Time Sampled Matrix Sample Type Condition
002 Field Blank 3/30/2009 11:05 OT Grab Ambient
Test Performed Method Results Lab Loc DaiedTme Qualifier
Low Level Mercury EPA 1631 <1.0 ng/L R 3131/09 6:29
Reviewed by:
Tor Tritest, 1

N
0
O
Cu
c
n
`t�f3uTg=-ST
6701 Conference Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607
ph: [phone] fax: [phone]
NCWWCart #67, NCDWCarl #37731
Report Results To:
LOUISBURG WRF
110 WEST NASH STREET
LOUISBURG, NC 27549
Attn: RICHARD COLLINS
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Chain of Custody
Bill Results To:
LOUISBURG TOWN HALL
110 WEST NASH STREET
LOUISBURG. NC 27549
Attn: RICHARD COLLINS
Tritest w.o. s 0902-00052 Page 1 of 1
❑ Standard Report Delivery
❑ Rush Report Delivery (w/ surcharge)
Note: Rush projects are subject to poor approval by Lab
Requested Due Date: _
Project Reference:
Law Level Mercury
Project Number:
WASTEWATER
Purchase Order#.
/
Sampled By:
Wit`",GC
Sample Description
6omposlie
a p e;'
op•; a e %,
a ru
na sl eques e
, ' p., .-.� y
Start Time
T"'
Stop Tlme
_
or Grab
W6V pw,
siw. GVv etc'-
�
=
Smp #
Effluent
G
>G
WW
Low Level Mercury
001
•;tea
Field Blank
G�
OT
Low Level Mercury
002
e in ed y�lgnalure)
(
eceived by a
Datq„ J pj �me _
`
or Lab Use Only:
Relinquished by (signature)
Received by (signature)
-j'
Date Time
Temperatue at receipt:
Relinquished by (signature
Received by (signature)
Date
Time
❑ 4+2 C
❑ Tem C

Jun 24 10 11:02a Louisburg Water Reclamati 919496PA93 p.10
O
O
'TRQTEST
nnmrit
FKtNbRVAT10N CHECK -IN SHEET
WON:
OA3 — C700
Chccked in by:
G_
Date
Tune•
Temp:
Route:
CD
TTPU
U M FEDX
GC UPS
Sample
No.
Analysis Requested
Sample
Type
Comp/
Grab
Container
Chlodo
Preservative
—None
HCL
H2500
HNO3
NaOH
Thin
OTHER
&/
C /
P / G
Pas / n
None
H
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C /
P /
Pos / n g
one
H L
H2SO4
HNO3
N30H
Thio
OTHER
C/G
PIG
Poslneg
None
H L
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos /neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
1 03
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P ! G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
1403
Na H
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P i G
Pos /neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
7hio
OTHER
C / G
P ! G
--F
Pos / neg
Nne
HCoL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
/ G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P ! G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P ! G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C 1 G
P / G
Pos /neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos ! neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Fos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
E 4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER
C / G
P / G
Pos / neg
None
HCL
ESO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thin
OTHER
rnernaF1kT1rc.
C / G
P i G
Pos / aeg
None
HCL
H2SO4
HNO3
NaOH
Thio
OTHER