20040337 Ver 2_Emails_20151015

From: Deaton, Anne
Sent: Monday, October l0'ZUl50:4UAK4
To: Steenhuis,Joanne; Gregson, Jim
Subject: FW: Waters Edge HOA Boat Docks Dredging Project
Attachments: Water's Edge HOA (DMF Review).doc; Water's Edge HOA (DMF Review).doc; Water's
Edge SAV presence (DMF Review).pdf
| have asked Louis and Steve for guidance on how to handle this. | asked Gregg for the raw data or a better
sketch. See attached. Hesaid they could clearly see all the bottom sothey sketched iLout and got percent
cover rather than doing transects. That's similar Lowhat |would have done.
Do you think this would suffice if that was what he sent the first time? Just curious. Doyou foresee DVVR
wanting the survey from DMF/consultant all the time from now on or just under certain conditions, and if so,
what conditions? Thanks for clarifying,
Anne
From: Bodnar, Gregg
Sent: Friday, October I6'20I5I:I9PM
To: Deaton, Anne <[e-mail]>
Cc: HuQQett,Doug <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Waters Edge HOA Boat Docks Dredging Project
Afternoon Anne,
I have attached a color sketch of the SAV locations that includes the dredge footprint, the original plan from the
application and I highlighted my comments that best describe the percent coverages. | did not add the percent coverages
to the sketch to keep it as clutter free as possible.
Hope this issufficient,
Gregg
From: Deaton, Anne
Sent: Thursday, October I5'20I53:02PM
To: Bodnar, Gregg
Subject: RE: Waters Edge HOA Boat Docks Dredging Project
Thanks. So did you run any transects and systematically do quadrat sampling for the density or just sketch it
out and approximate?
From: Bodnar, Gregg
Sent: Thursday, October I5'20I52:I2PM
To: Deaton, Anne
1

Cc: Huggett, Doug <dou8.__h_uggett n_cdenr_gov>
Subject: RE: Waters Edge HOA Boat Docks Dredging Project
Afternoon Anne,
I have attached the survey sketch and comments which documents the previous application withdraw in 2008
and a narrative of the SAV survey.
Gregg
From: Deaton, Anne
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 11:38 AM
To: Bodnar, Gregg <g_re.gg.:_h_o_d_n_a_r_n_rd_e_n_r_g_ov>
Subject: FW: Waters Edge HOA Boat Docks Dredging Project
I talked to Jim Gregson about this. Attached the DWR response. They have put the app on hold pending an SAV
survey from DMF or a consultant. Could you send me your SAV survey data, sketch, maps, letter. I'll look it
over. I am thinking I might be able to just say I reviewed your data and concur. Or something like that.
Anne
From: Gregson, Jim
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 10:38 AM
To: Deaton, Anne <anne.deaton@nc_denr_f,,ov>
................................................................
Subject: FW: Waters Edge HOA Boat Docks Dredging Project
Jim Gregson, Regional Supervisor
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]
**E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.**
From: Higgins, Karen
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 4:05 PM
To : a d a rn_k n_i e rim a_i.i_:_c_o_m.
Cc: Steenhuis, Joanne <joanne.steenhuis ncdenr. ov>; Gregson, Jim <jim.gre�;[e-mail]>;
Sarah.e.hair@_u�are_army_mil, Coats, Heather<heather.coats ncdenrg_ov>, Dail, Jason <jason.dail@ncdenr.�;ov>
...... ........
Subject: Waters Edge HOA Boat Docks Dredging Project
N

Please find a request for additional information attached.
Thanks -
Karen
Karen Higgins
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit Supervisor
NC DEQ- Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Website: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/401bufferpermitting
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.

• s• i I� s r rI NINEsIF 01i i
1/ 191/ reffiT, Ry MIN 1/
TO: Doug Huggett, DCM Major Permit Coordinator
FROM: Gregg Bodnar, DCM Fisheries Resource Specialist
SUBJECT: Water's Edge HOA (Hampstead)
DATE: 8/20/2015
� r s i s i� ,r r ■
A North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (DCM) Fisheries Resource Specialist has reviewed the
subject permit application for proposed actions that impact fish and fish habitats. The applicant proposes
to conduct new dredging around an existing boating facility. Waters are classified as supporting shellfish
(SA), Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), Mill Creek (adjacent to site) is classified as Secondary Nursery
Area (SNA), and waters are open to the harvest of shellfish by the NC Division of Marine Fisheries Shellfish
Sanitation Section.
In 2004 a Major Modification was submitted to an existing Major Permit (#68-03) to construct an 18 slip
community dock, nine slips within Mill Creek and nine slips within the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway
(AIWW). The permit was authorized. In 2008 a CAMA Major Permit application was submitted to
perform new dredging within the AIWW portion of the docking facility (slips 5-9). DCM field staff noted
submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) within the dredge footprint. The application was circulated and
numerous agencies replied unfavorably due to the impacts to SAV and SAV habitat. Furthermore NC
Wildlife Resources Commission comments relating to the 2003 Environmental Assessment recommended
that no dredging be allowed based on SAV impacts. The application was withdrawn and no further action
was taken. In April and June 2015, DCM field staff and fisheries resource specialists surveyed the area
and documented SAV within the current dredge footprint. As designed, slips 1-4 have a 50ft. wide x 75ft.
long x -4ft. depth footprint. Slips 5-9 have a 50ft. wide x 100ft. long x -4ft. depth footprint. to
North Carolina ranks second behind Florida in SAV presence. Observations since 2000 have indicated that
SAV coverage in North Carolina is expanding into previously unobserved areas. SAV is a vital component
to the estuarine system and is excellent nursery area for many fisheries species, supporting high diversity
of fish and invertebrates, and provides valuable ecosystem services as a primary producer and enhancer
1Coo1 Maii, Se-rv�,cz C-e�, Nm fi,,, Garo4,i,vt.a
7 -7/_ 0 0 --1
A- EquaLOpporhm tv y \ Affwmalwel Ac4,.cEmpto-yer — Made
t - r-ar ly r"cieA t -a.Y

of water quality (Deaton et al. 2010). SAV filters water, stabilizes sediment (Fonseca 1996, Stephan and
Bigford 1997), and provides refuge forjuvenile finfish, crabs and shrimp (Savino and Stein 1989, Rooker et
al. 1998). SAV supports a vast array of epiphytes and other sessile invertebrates that serve as a food
source for many fisheries species. Waters containing SAV have higher species richness and abundance
than those without SAV (Thayer et al. 1975, Ross and Stevens 1992), and can improve water quality and
clarity through the filtration of water by the associated epiphytic community. SAV is recognized as
essential fish habitat due to its primary production, structural complexity, modification of energy regimes,
sediment and shoreline stabilization, and nutrient cycling (Deaton et al. 2010).
The proposed application intends to perform new dredging in and around the existing slips within the
AIWW docking facility (slips 1-9). DCM field staff and fisheries resource specialists have observed SAV
resource within the dredge footprint as far back as the 2008 CAMA Major Permit application, which was
withdrawn due to the presence of SAV and unfavorable comments from multiple resource agencies. The
authorization of new dredging at the project site would directly and negatively impact the SAV through
direct removal of the resource and alteration of the habitat to discourage recolonization. Therefore,
object to the project as proposed due to the significant and adverse impacts to the marine and estuarine
resource, principally SAV, at the project site.
Contact Gregg Bodnar at [phone] ext. 213 or [e-mail] with further questions or
concerns.
Deaton, A.S., W.S. Chappell, K. Hart, J. O'Neal, B. Boutin. 2010. North Carolina Coastal Habitat Protection
Plan. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Division of Marine
Fisheries, NC. 639 pp.
Fonseca, M. S. 1996. The role of seagrasses in nearshore sedimentary processes: a review. p. 261-286 in
C. Roman and K. Nordstrom (eds). Estuarine Shores: Hydrological, Geomorphological and
Ecological Interactions. Blackwell, Boston, MA.
Rooker, J. R., G.J. Holt, and S.A. Holt. 1998. Vulnerability of newly settled red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus)
to predatory fish: is early -life survival enhanced by seagrass meadows? Marine Biology 131(1):
145-151.
Ross, J. L. and T.M. Stevens. 1992. Life history and population dynamics of red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus)
in North Carolina waters. NC Division of Marine Fisheries, Morehead City, NC, Marine Fisheries
Research Completion Report Project F-29, 130p.
Savino, J. F. and R.A. Stein. 1989. Behavior of fish predators and their prey: habitat choice between open
water and dense vegetation. Environmental Biology of Fishes 24(4): 287-293.
Stephan, C. D. and T.E. Bigford. 1997. Atlantic coastal submerged aquatic vegetation: a review of its
ecological role, anthropogenic impacts, state regulations, and value to Atlantic coastal fish stocks.
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, 77p.
Thayer, G. W., S.M. Adams, and M.W. La Croix. 1975. Structural and functional aspects of a recently
established Zostera marina community. p. 518-540 in L.E. Cronin (ed.). Estuarine Research.
Academic Press, New York, NY.

-�a N 'T
ze
q
d
VI"
C A Q ON r7"--
N6
M:
SAY P�cscn�,
bscn'p�-on
-OA. ;
c 1 ,
•J I l�Y / 6.-
/ e,i z>,;,, 5 0
PP ��
-po-
0
0