NC0020231_Historical_2013

Regional Inspectors' Checklist for Field Parameters
Facility Name: T.F Cw#-I WAE
Regional Plant Inspector: ar S - A�
NPDES #: C a'O 2a '2 Z
Regional Inspector Contact # S F - ? 9 /- qzj
Field Lab Certification #: 1�-3
Region: K a
Lab Contact: , hd o
Date: 5 y ) ya Y
1. Check the parameter(s) performed at this site for reporting purposes.
❑ Total Residual. Chlorine (TRC) rO Temperature (TEMP) ❑ Specific Conductivity (SC)
R pH J2 Dissolved Oxygen (DO) ❑ Settleable Residue (SETT)
H. General Laboratory note any exceptions in section XI
Are instruments, meters, probes, photometric cells, etc. maintained in good condition? I KI Yes EINo
Are standards, reagents and consumables used within manufacturer expiration dates? 0 Yes UNo
RC gel standard is exempt.]
Are the following itemsdocumentedwhere applicabille
Item `
TRC `
H
TEMP
DO
SC
SETT
Date of sample collection*
Time of sample collection*
Sample collector's initials or signature
/
Date of sample analysis*
/
Time of sample analysis*
/
Anal st initials or signature
Sample location
-Date and time of sample collection and analysis may be the same for in situ or on -site measurements.
III.:-. Total Residual Chlorine .
Total Residual Chlorine meter make and model:
Is a check standard analyzed each day of use? Circle one: gel or liquid standard
❑ Yes
❑ No
What is the assigned/observed value of the daily check standard?
Is a 5-point calibration verificationperformed? Note date of last verification:
❑ Yes
❑ No
Alternatively, does the lab construct a linear regression, using 5 standards, to calculate
results? Note date of last calibration curve constructed:
❑ Yes
❑ No
True values: ❑ pg/L ❑ mg/L
Obtained values:
pg/L El mg/L
What program are samples analyzed on?
Are results reported in proper units? Check one: /L Lj m /L
Yes
No
Are results reported between the facility's permit limit and the compliance limit of 50 pg/L?
If value is less than the low standard, report as "<x", where x=low standard conc.
Yes
Lj No
Are samples analyzed within 15 minutes of collection?
❑ Yes
El No
IV. pH_ _ -
pH meter make and model: ec !i SO
Is the pH meter calibrated with at least 2 buffers per mfg's instructions each day of use?
Note buffers used: 1 10
Yes
❑ No
Is the pH meter calibration checked with an additional buffer each day of use? Note check
buffer used: 44
®Yes
.❑ No
Does the check buffer read within f0.1 S.U. of the known value?
Z Yes
❑ No
Are the following items documented:
Meter calibration?
Yes
❑ No
Check buffer reading?
Yes
❑ No
Are samples analyzed within 15 minutes of collection?
ILE Yes
❑ No
Are sample results reported to 0.1 pH units?
I EZ Yes
❑ No

mperatuns
What instrument(s) is used to measure temperature? Check all that apply: KpH meter
❑ DO meter Conductivity meter El Digital thermometer ❑ Glass thermometer
Is the instrument/thermometer calibration checked at least annually against a NIST
traceable or NIST certified thermometer? t 2—^ // — ZG ya
Yes
❑ No
ed on the instrument/thermomef?
Are temperature corrections even if zero posted et
Are samples measured in situ or on -site? [REQUIRED - there is no holding time for
tem erature
Are sample results reported in de rees C?
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
❑ No
❑ No
Vt: Dissolved; Oxygen
DO meter make and model: 0 K 0 6t= D
Is the air calibration of the DO meter performed each dayof use?
Yes
No
Are the following items documented:
Meter calibration?
Yes
No
Are samples analyzed within 15 minutes of collection?
Yes
Lj No
Are results reported in m /L?
Yes
❑ No
VIC Conductivity
Conductivity meter make and model:
Is the meter calibrated daily according to the manufacturer's instructions? Note standard
used this is generally a one -point calibration):
Yes
❑ No
Is a daily check standard analyzed? Note value:
Yes
No
Are the following items documented:
Meter calibration?
Yes
No
Are samples analyzed within 28 days of collection?
Yes
No
Are results reported in mhos/cm some meters display equivalentPS/cm units)?
❑ Yes
No
Vill. Settleable Residue
Does the laboratory have an Imhoff Cone in good condition?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Is the sample settled for 1 hour?
❑Yes
❑ No
Is the sample agitated after 45 minutes?
❑Yes
❑ No
Are the following items documented:
Volume of sample analyzed? Note volume analyzed:
Yes
LJ
No
Date and time of sample analysis(settling start time)?
❑ Yes
❑
No
Time of agitation after 45 minutes of settling?
Yes
❑
No
Sample analysis completion(settling end time)?
❑ Yes
Lj
No
Are samples analyzed within 48 hours of collection?
Yes
No
Are results reported in ml/L?
F Yes
Ej
No
IX. Was a paper trail (comparing contract lab and on -site data to DMR)
performed? If so, list months reviewed: --vc, ( a- -A-0 z-)
Q Yes
❑ No
x Is follow-up by the Laboratory Certification program recommended?
❑ Yes
No
XI. Additional commQnts:
Please submit a copy of this completed form to the Laboratory Certification program at:
DWO Lab Certification, Chemistry Lab, Courier # 52-01-01
Electronic copies may be emailed to Iinda.chavisCa.ncdenr.aov.
Revision 04/20/2012

ROY COOPER
Governor
DIONNE DELLFGATTI
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Mr. Jonathan Franklin
Town Administrator
Town of Louisburg
110 West Nash Street
Louisburg, NC 27549
NORTH CAROUNA
Environmental Quality
May 20, 2021
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Tar River Water Reclamation Facility
Permit No. NCO020231
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Franklin:
On March 29, 2021, Cheng Zhang of the Raleigh Regional Office (RRO) conducted a compliance
evaluation inspection of the subject facility. The assistance provided by Mr. Jimmy Ellington, the
operator in responsible charge (ORC), and Mr. Richard Collins, the lab supervisor, was appreciated as it
facilitated the inspection process. The inspection report is attached. The following observations were
made:
Tar River Water Reclamation Facility is permitted to discharge at a rate of 1.37 MGD and consist of:
mechanical bar screen, aerated grit/grease removal, anaerobic selector, dual oxidation ditches
(BioDeniopho Process), dual secondary clarifiers, three tertiary filters, ultraviolet disinfection,
cascade aeration, aerobic digesters, and ultrasonic flow meter. The plant discharges into the Tar
River, a WS-V NSW waters in the Tar -Pamlico River basin.
1. At the time of inspection, permit expired on September 30, 2019. Permit was renewed on
February 25, 2021, became effective on April 1, 2021 and expires on September 30, 2025.
Mercury minimization plan required in the expired permit was developed and implemented.
2. A new mechanical bar screen was installed at influent pump station about two years ago. Also
installed was a septic receiving station which removes debris/grits and meters septage flow.
3. The dual oxidation ditches with BioDeniopho Process have been very effective in biological
nutrient removal with the modified phases. It was noted that one mixer in one of the oxidation
ditches was out of service and needed to be replaced (replacement mixer was on order at the time
of inspection). Solids settled well in the two clarifiers. Two of the three tertiary filters were in
service. Wasted sludge is settled first in the old clarifier of the original plant before being treated
in the two aerobic digesters.
4. The ORC maintains a daily logbook. Lab results, chain -of -custody forms, and Discharge
DE Q�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
_ Raleigh Regional Office 13800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh. North Carolina 27609
•^�x••� /'� 919.791.4200

Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were complete and current, kept in good order and ready for
review. July and December 2020 DMR data were compared to lab bench sheets; no data
transcription errors were noted during the inspection.
5. The right of way to the Outfall 001 was well maintained. The effluent was observed to be clear
and free of solids. No visible impacts were noted immediately downstream the effluent pipe.
6. Field lab parameter (Certificate No. 439) calibration and analysis records were reviewed during
the inspection.
This facility was found to be compliant with NPDES permit conditions as a result of this inspection. If
you have any questions regarding the attached reports or any of the findings, please contact Cheng
Zhang at: (919) 7914200 (or email: cheng zhang_(@,ncdenr.gov).
Sincerely,
EDoeu3igned by:
f. hAkud
B2918E8A832144F...
Vanessa E. Manuel, Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Raleigh Regional Office
Division of Water Resources
Enclosure: EPA Water Compliance Inspection Report
CC: Laserfiche
Jimmy Ellington — ORC (electronic copy only)
D E QJ� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office 13800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh. North Carolina 27609
e.a,� 919.791.4200

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 (ti ( 2 IS I 3 I NC0020231 I11 12 21/03/29 17 18I C I 191 c I 201 I
211111 I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I r6
Inspection
Work Days Facility Self-Mondoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA --Reserved
671
I 7072 N 73ILLJ 74 75_LL_L_L_L1 80
L _J 70LJ 71I
Section B: FacilityData
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES Dens@ Number)
10:10AM 21/03/29
16/03/01
Tar River Water Reclamation Facility W WTP
Treatment Plant Rd Off Hwy 56
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
Louisburg NC 27549
12:45PM 21/03/29
19/09/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(syTtles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
///
Jimmy Wayne Ellington/ORC/919-496-5101/
Name, Address of Responsible OfficialRtle/Phone and Fax Number
Billy FauIk,PO Box 468 Louisburg NC 27549//919-496-3236/ Contacted
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit 0 Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenar Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Progran 0 Sludge Handling Dispo: Facility Site Review EffluenUReceiving Wate
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Chang Zhang saigiw4 by:DWR/RRO WQ/919-791-4200/
yu 5/20/2021
E71508E1EC41F
...
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Dxuepma by:
l/A,A.t,sia Matn� 5/20/2021
�132916E6A9321NF..
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page#

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
NCO020231 11 1 21/03/29 17 18 1 CI
(Cont.)
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
At the time of inspection, permit expired on September 30, 2019. Permit was renewed on February
25, 2021, became effective on April 1, 2021 and expires on September 30, 2025. Mercury
minimization plan required in the expired permit was developed and implemented.
Facility is permitted to discharge at a rate of 1.37 MGD and consist of: mechanical bar screen,
aerated grit/grease removal, anaerobic selector, dual oxidation ditches (BioDeniopho Process), dual
secondary clarifiers, three tertiary filters, ultraviolet disinfection, cascade aeration, aerobic digesters,
and ultrasonic flow meter.
All treatment units were operable, except for one mixer in one of two oxidation ditched needed to be
replaced.
Review of records did not reveal dificiencies.
Page#

Permit: NCO020231
Inspection Date: 03/29/2021
Owner- Facility: 1a. ^iver Water Reclamation Facility WW
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: The facility analyzes MLSS pH DO and sludge iudge for process control
Permit
Yes
No
NA
NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
❑
❑
IN
❑
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment: At the time of inspection permit expired on September 30 2019 Permit was renewed
on February 25 2021 became effective on April 1 2021 and expires on September
30 2025 Mercury minimization plan required in the expired permit was developed and
implemented.
Record Keeping
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
M
❑
❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
M
❑
❑
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
0
❑
❑
❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
M
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
IN
❑
❑
❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
0
❑
❑
❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified
❑
❑
0
❑
operator on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
M
❑
❑
❑
Page# 3

Permit: NCO020231 Owner • Facility: Ta..... Water Reclamation Facility WW
Inspection Date: 03/29/2021 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping
Yes
No
NA NE
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility
❑
❑ ❑
classification?
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
M
❑
❑ ❑
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
0
❑
❑ ❑
Comment:
Pump Station - Influent
Yes
No
NA NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the wet well free of excessive grease?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps present?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are all pumps operable?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are float controls operable?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
N
❑
❑
❑
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Influent Sampling
Yes
No
NA NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
❑
0
❑
❑
Is sample collected above side streams?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0
■
❑
❑
❑
degrees Celsius)?
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Time Paced composite samples are collected at influent.
Flow Measurement - Influent
Yes
No
NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
❑
0
❑
❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
0
❑
❑
❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
❑
❑
M
❑
Comment: Calibrated on 8/27/2020
Page# 4

Permit: NCO020231 Owner - Facility: Ta .... _r Water Reclamation Facility WW
Inspection Date: 03/29/2021 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Bar Screens Yes No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
❑
b.Mechanical
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
N
❑
❑
❑
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the unit in good condition?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Primary mechanical bar screen was installed about two years ago.
Grit Removal
Yes
No
NA
NE
Type of grit removal
a.Manual
❑
b.Mechanical
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the grit free of excessive odor?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is disposal of grit in compliance?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment: The grit/grease unit is operated manually by operators (6 times/day).
Grease Removal
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is automatic grease removal present?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is grease removal operating properly?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment: The grit/grease unit is operated manually by operators (6 times/day).
Oxidation Ditches
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are the aerators operational?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are the aerators free of excessive solids build up?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
0
❑
❑
❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are settleometer results acceptable (> 30 minutes)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1)
0
❑
❑
❑
Are settelometer results acceptable?(400 to 800 ml/I in 30 minutes)
■
❑
❑
❑
Page# 5

Permit: NCO020231
Inspection Date: 03/29/2021
Oxidation Ditches
Owner- Facility: T:....._r Water Reclamation Facility WW
Inspection Type: compliance Evaluation
Yes No NA NE
Comment: Two BioDeniopho Units (ditches) in series, each with two mixers and two rotor aerators
and six phases. One mixer was out of service and needed to be replaced (replacement
mixer ordered and waiting for delivery). Facility was operating with 4 phases in each
ditch (two anoxic and two oxic) at the time of inspection.
Nutrient Removal Yes No NA NE
# Is total nitrogen removal required? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is total phosphorous removal required? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Type Biological
# Is chemical feed required to sustain process? ❑ IN ❑ ❑
Is nutrient removal process operating properly? IN ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Nitrogen and phosphorous are biologically removed without the need of chemical feed.
Secondary Clarifier
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
Are weirs level?
Is the site free of weir blockage?
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
Is scum removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
Is the drive unit operational?
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/. of the sidewall depth)
Yes
No
NA
NE
IN
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
M
❑
❑
❑
Comment: One clarifier was rehabed recently,
the other will be rehabed in the near future Weirs
were covered to prevent algae growth. Sludge blanket was between 1 to 2 feet Scam
pump station with one Dump.
Filtration (High Rate Tertiary)
Yes No
NA
NE
Type of operation:
Up flow
Is the filter media present?
IN ❑
❑
❑
Is the filter surface free of clogging?
IN ❑
❑
❑
Is the filter free of growth?
0 ❑
❑
❑
Is the air scour operational?
N ❑
❑
❑
Page# 6

Permit: NCO020231 Owner -Facility:
T- ...-,r Water Reclamation Facility WW
Inspection Date: 03/29/2021 Inspection Type:
Compliance Evaluation
Filtration (High Rate Tertiary)
Yes
No
NA NE
Is the scouring acceptable?
0
❑
❑ ❑
Is the clear well free of excessive solids and filter media?
0
❑
❑ ❑
Comment: Three Parkson filters, two in service. filters are backwashed constantly.
Disinfection - UV
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are extra UV bulbs available on site?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are UV bulbs clean?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is UV intensity adequate?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is transmittance at or above designed level?
N
❑
❑
❑
Is there a backup system on site?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is effluent clear and free of solids?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: UV channel with two banks of UV lamps.
Pumps-RAS-WAS
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are pumps in place?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are pumps operational?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment: One RAS and one WAS Dump. One larger RAS pump on site as backup.
Effluent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
N
❑
❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0
■
❑
❑
❑
degrees Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type
❑
❑
❑
representative)?
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
N
❑
❑
❑
Page# 7

Permit: NCO020231
Inspection Date: 03/29/2021
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Owner -Facility: Tar miner Water Reclamation Facility WW
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
Comment: Calibrated on 8/27/2020.
Effluent Pipe
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
Comment:
Standby Power
Is automatically activated standby power available?
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
Is the generator tested under load?
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up
power?
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ M ❑
Yes
No
NA
NE
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
Yes
No
NA
NE
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: The generator is capable to run about half the plant without phasing. 600-gallon diesel
tank for the generator.
Laboratory
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
M
❑
❑
❑
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0
❑
❑
❑
degrees Celsius)?
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
0
❑
❑
❑
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
❑
❑
0
❑
Comment: Facility analyzes field parameters TSS ammonia and fecal coliform Other
parameters
are analyzed by contract labs
Aerobic Digester
Is the capacity adequate?
Is the mixing adequate?
Yes
No
NA NE
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
Page# 8

Permit: NCO020231 Owner -Facility: T !r Water Reclamation Facility WW
Inspection Date: 03/29/2021 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is the odor acceptable?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
N
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Two aerobic digesters each was about half full at the time of inspection.
Waste sludoe
the digesters.
Drying Beds
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is there adequate drying bed space?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are the drying beds free of vegetation?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of stockpiled sludge?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to the front of the plant?
❑
❑
0
❑
# Is the sludge disposed of through county landfill?
❑
M
❑
❑
# Is the sludge land applied?
■
❑
❑
❑
(Vacuum filters) Is polymer mixing adequate?
❑
❑
M
❑
Comment: 6 drying beds are not used to dry sludge. One bed was used to hold rags from sewer
Dump station wet wells.
Upstream / Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
and sampling location)?
Comment: Member of Tar -Pamlico Basin Association.
Page# 9

WATER POLLUTION C( ROtSYSTEM OPERATOR DES1131"- 0"Nilrbw (WPCSOCC)
• NCAC 15A 8G .0201 NOY 16 2a
Press TAB to enter information
Permittee Owner/Officer Name: Jonathan Franklin Raleigh R�
Email Address: [e-mail]
—
Permittee Signature:
Facility Name: Louisburg Water Reclamation Facility
SUBMIT A SEPARATE FORA FOR EACH CLASSIFICATION OF SYSTEM:
Date: �v
Permit# NCO020231
Facility Type: WW Q
Facility Grade: IV Q
ORC - OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE
Print Full Name: Jimmy Wayne Ellington Work Phone: [phone]
Certificate Type: WW Q Certificate Grade: IV Q Certificate #: 10505
Email Address:
Signature: Effective Date:
certify that I agree to my sig i as the Operat r in Responsible Charge for the facility noted. 1 understand and will abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining t responsibilities of the ORC asset forth in 15A NCAC 08G .0204 and failing to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Poll tion Control System Operators Certification Commission."
BACKUP ORC
Print Full Name: Stephen Brett Gilliam Work Phone: [phone]
Certificate Type: WW 0 Certificate Grade: IV Q Certificate #:
Email Address: [e-mail] , I . , A
Signature:
1002185
Effective Date: // /O — .-2Oc2O
"I certify that I agree to my designation as a Back-up Operator in Responsible Charge for the facility noted. I understand and will abide by
the rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the ORC as set forth in 1SA NCAC 08G .0204 and failing to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
Mail, fax or email W PCSOCC, 1618 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1618
ORIGINALto: Email: [e-mail] Fax:[phone]
Mail or Fax a COPY to: Asheville
Fayetteville
2090 US Hwy 70
225 Green St., Suite 714
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Fax:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
Phone:[phone]
Phone:[phone]
Washington
943 Washington Sq. Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Fax:[phone]
Phone:[phone]
Wilmington
127 Cardinal Dr.
Wilmington, NC 28405-2845
Fax:[phone]
Phone:[phone]
Mooresville
Raleigh
610 E. Center Ave., Suite 301
3800 Barrett Dr.
Mooresville, NC 28115
Raleigh, NC 27609
Fax:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
Phone:[phone]
Phone:[phone]
Winston-Salem
45 W. Hanes Mill Rd.
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Fax: [phone] Phone:
336-776-9800 Revised W019

qAi•
a'r44
!
WER ` !•-y r >
.L S. REGAY
CULPEPPER Nou r r- CAROLINA
Envlranwnraf Quafrty
zrtified Mail # 7017 2680 0000 2236 7825
return Receipt Requested
December 18, 2019
Doug Dunne
Toney Lumber Co Inc
PO Box 447
Louisburg, NC 27549
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Tracking Number: NOV-2019-LR-0126
Permit No. NCO089010
Louisburg Lumber Mill
Franklin County
Dear Dunne:
I>✓l�ol< y
A review of the September 2019 Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) for the subject facility revealed the
violation indicated below:
Reporting Violation:
Sample
Location Parameter
Date Type of Violation
10/31/2019 Late/Missing DMR
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct any noted problems. The Division of
Water Resources may pursue enforcement actions for this and any additional violations. If the violations are of a
continuing nature, not related to operation and/or maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial
construction activities, then you may wish to consider applying for a Special Order by Consent (SOC).
_��--V_EQ' .

If you have any questions concerning this matter or to apply for an SOC, please contact Mitchell Hayes of the
Raleigh Regional Office at 919-791-4200.
Sincerely,
Scott Vinson, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Raleigh Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Cc: WQS Raleigh Regional Office - Enforcement File
NPDES Complianfe/ nforcement Unit - Enforcement File
Laserfiche IZf�01

ROY COOPER
Gareenw
MICHAEL S. RECAN
Secwary
LINDA CULPEPPER
A'. n.
y^ui
NORth CAROUNA
Environmental Quality
Certified Mail # 7017 2680 0000 2236 7825
Return Receipt Requested
December 18, 2019
Doug Dunne
Toney Lumber Co Inc
PO Box 447
Louisburg, NC 27549
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Tracking Number: NOV-2019-LR-0125
Permit No. NCO089010
Louisburg Lumber Mill
Franklin County
Dear Mr. Dunne:
A review of the August 2019 Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) for the subject facility revealed the violation
indicated below:
Reporting Violation:
Sample
Location Parameter
Date Type of Violation
10/1/2019 Late/Missing DMR
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct any noted problems. The Division of
Water Resources may pursue enforcement actions for this and any additional violations. If the violations are of a
continuing nature, not related to operation and/or maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial
construction activities, then you may wish to consider applying for a Special Order by Consent (SOC).

If you have any questions concerning this matter or to apply for an SOC, please contact Mitchell Hayes of the
Raleigh Regional Office at 919-791-4200.
Sincerely,
Scott Vinson, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Raleigh Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Cc: WQS Raleigh Regional Office - Enforcement File
NPDES Compli nc /Enforcement Unit - Enforcement File
Laserfiche PP I
L/"iI E S N:rt^£ia �:-e'uaGs^.- ICE -srt� -_ _ e' ,_ . vL_.. !
i Fae+F xe :H:x :c__•

Deck, Erin M
From: jimmy ellington <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 4:03 PM
To: Deck, Erin M
Subject: [External] Louisburg WWTP equipment down
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail] :;;:.-:.;.�....
Erin,
Per our phone conversation I am sending you this email.
Secondary clarifier 1 had to be shut down Sunday night approximately 0830. It was later determined that all
electrical control functions where fine, but we had a possible gearbox failure. This type of work would require
outside assistance.
My crew has drained the clarifier and shut down all controls. I contacted Russell Underwood with Charles R.
Underwood, Inc. to come out and assess the problem and talk about repair and cost. This meeting should
hopefully take place in a couple of days.
A project for rehab of both clarifiers was previously submitted to the State for possible grant and we should find
out if we qualify in a couple of weeks. Louisburg officials obviously would like to see if we can fix this with a
grant as previously planned. My experience with this process is if we get the grant it could be a year before the
project begins.
So, which ever avenue my people decide to take, I think this clarifier could be down for a while. We can
continue to treat and remain compliant with one clarifier, but you should also know that both of these clarifiers
are 25 years old. Which is why we where seeking a grant for rehab. I have made my people aware of my
concerns based on the age of the still functioning clarifier.
If you have any questions please let me know. Thanks for your time.
Jimmy Ellington
WWTP ORC
Town of Louisburg
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad

Jimmy Ellington (ORC) of Town of Louisburg RLAP WQ0005981 and NC0020231
called Ray Milosh on June 1, 2018 to say that the influent station is being
rehabbed. The process will take most of a year. The influent station is currently
being bypassed to take measurements and will occasionally be put back into
service or bypassed as parts arrive and are installed.

Town of Louisburg, NC
Service Area Common Sources of Mercury
Annual Survey
Axiom Dentistry of Louisburg
Comments: 12-11-2018, spoke with Dr. Lee Currin. Dr. Currin explained that the practice has an ADA
approved amalgam separator and uses no mercury thermometers. This complies with EPA
Rules.
Franklin Plaza Dental Center
Comments: 12-12-2018, spoke to Patsy Cash (office manager). Mrs. Cash explained that the practice has
an ADA approved amalgam separator and uses no mercury thermometers. This complies
with EPA rules.
Louisburg Family Dentistry
Comments: 12-17-2018, spoke with Dr. Don Lee. Dr. Lee explained that the practice has an ADA
approved amalgam separator and uses no mercury thermometers. This complies with
EPA rules.
Hardy & Hardy Family Dentistry
Comments: 12-19-2018, spoke with Dr. James Hardy. Dr. Hardy explained that the practice stopped
using amalgam material 10 years ago and has a vacuum system that includes an amalgam
trap and uses no mercury thermometers. This complies with EPA rules.
Survey Prepared by:
Date
16? -/ 5 -"�OlT

Town of Louisburg, NC
Service Area Common Sources of Mercury
Axiom Dentistry of Louisburg
117 South Bickett Blvd.
919-298-2008
Franklin Plaza dental Center
311 South Bickett Blvd. #311
919-853-6453
Louisburg Family Dentistry
531 South Bickett Blvd.
919-496-1100
Hardy & Hardy Family Dentistry
122 Jolly Street
919-496-3088

MERI TECH, INC.
,€ ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
' Laboratory Certification No. 165
Client: Louisburg WRF DateSanq,Icd 09/1^^>,'17
I10 West Nash Street Digested 09/21/17
Louisburg, NC 27549 Analysis 09/27/17
Attention Richard Collins Analyst: CWL
NPDES#
EPA 1631 Low Level Mercury Analysis
Mcritech ID 0
Sample ID
Result
Reporting Limi[
MBLK0728UU
Method Blank
<0.5 ng/L
0.5 ng/L
M09211705
Field Blank
1.32 ng/L
1.0 ng/L
M09211706
Effluent
6.70 ng/L
1.0 ng/L
M09211707
Field Blank
1.74 ng/L
1.0 ng/L
M09211708
Influent
82.4 ng/L
1.0 ng/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
ii.TLl.'.ty/
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Rd - PO Box 27 - Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph - [phone] Fax
E-Mail: [e-mail]

TOWN OF LOUISBURG
MUNICIPAL MERCURY MINIMIZATION PLAN
October 01, 2017
SECTION I - PURPOSE
The purpose of this Mercury Minimization Plan ("MMP") is to describe best management practices
through which The Town of Louisburg will seek to reduce the amount of mercury discharged into its
system and, ultimately, to the environment. The MMP compiles mercury reduction -related efforts to -date
and potential future action items. It is designed to be a working document to help guide The Town of
Louisburg in its efforts to control mercury loadings discharged into its Publicly -Owned Treatment Works
(POTW) by users of the sewer system. Such a reduction in loadings to the sewer system should translate
to a reduction in the amount of mercury which is discharged from the treatment plant. The management
practices summarized below may also help control some of the mercury reaching our storm sewer system
as well.
SECTION II — FACILITY DESCRIPTION
The Town of Louisburg operates a publicly owned treatment works (POTW), including a collection
system and wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), that serves The Town of Louisburg, North Carolina.
Permitted 1.37 mgd POTW located NC hwy. 56 East, southeast of Louisburg, Franklin Co. consisting of
the following processes:
Mechanical bar screen
Aerated grit / grease removal
Anaerobic selector
Dual oxidation ditches (BioDenipho aka biological nitrogen phosphorus removal process)
- Dual secondary clarifiers
- *Three cell tertiary filter*
- Ultraviolet disinfection
- Cascade aeration
- Dual aerobic digesters
- Ultrasonic flow meter
POTW discharges treated wastewater through outfall 001 into the Tar River that is a classified WS-V
NSW waters in the Tar Pamlico River Basin. POTW has been consistently compliant since beginning
operation in 1993.
Most municipal treatment plants are not designed to remove mercury and it is exceedingly expensive to
do so to very low levels. Incidental mercury removal occurs through typical municipal treatment with
trace levels of mercury (and other metals) ending up in solids removed from the raw wastewater.

Mercury is not used in the treatment processes at the WWTP. Mercury may be introduced into the sewer
system through a variety of sources, such as from industrial users, laboratories, and other businesses.
Residual deposits of mercury are also possible in the sewer system from historic practices. Finally, trace
amounts from household products and atmospheric deposition (both wet and dry) contribute to sewer
system mercury loadings.
While there is typically some mercury contributed to public sewer systems statewide, it is usually in
minute quantities and comprises a tiny portion of the already insignificant statewide loading for all point
sources -just two percent of the annual mercury loadings to all State waters.
SECTION III — PROGRAM PLAN
A. EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL NON -DOMESTIC SOURCES CONTRIBUTING
MERCURY TO THE POTW
Within 24 months from the NPDES required 180-day period for development of an MMP, , the Town of
Louisburg will evaluate available information to assess the potential for non -domestic users of the sewer
system to contribute mercury to the system. The information to be reviewed may include: (1) POTW
influent and effluent mercury data and trends; (2) industrial user permits and associated mercury
monitoring data; (3) Toxics Release Inventory (TRI); (4) state hazardous site registry and the National
Priority List relating to mercury contamination; and (5) historical records of industrial sites which may
have contributed mercury loadings to the sewer system.
The Town of Louisburg will also survey and evaluate the following common sources of mercury in its
service area: (1) dentist offices; (2) hospitals; (3) laboratories; (4) auto recyclers; and (5) other potential
sources of mercury based on existing information.
The Town of Louisburg will request that industrial users review mercury concentrations in high -volume
process chemicals and demonstrate that the mercury concentrations are below industry average. The
Town of Louisburg will request that alternative sources for chemicals be explored if the mercury levels
are determined to be significantly higher than would normally be expected.
The evaluation of potential non -domestic sources of mercury to the sewer system will be updated every
five years, as warranted by prior sampling results and any additional new potentially significant sources to
the system.
B. ADDITIONAL CONTROL MEASURES
This MMP identifies reasonable and cost-effective control measures to minimize mercury being
discharged into the POTW. Below is a listing of initial BMPs for this POTW.
Pollution Prevention
Substances used at the W WTP will be evaluated to determine if they contain mercury or mercury -based
compounds. Any such chemicals will be evaluated for substitution with non -mercury -containing
substances.

Housekeeoine. Swill Control and Collection. and Education
The Town of Louisburg will develop procedures to minimize the possibility of any spill or release at the
WWTP involving mercury containing substances. The Town of Louisburg will add mercury
identification and proper disposal to ongoing and future operator training procedures.
Public Outreach
The Town of Louisburg will make available educational information regarding sources of household
mercury and appropriate use/disposal practices. This information may be posted on the Town of
Louisburg's website. The availability of this information will be highlighted in [insert utility's chosen
time frame] outreach to Town of Louisburg's customers. The Town of Louisburg will also facilitate
public awareness regarding community collection points for mercury -containing products from
residents/customers for proper disposal. Periodic reminders of such collection programs will be provided
as part of the Town of Louisburg's ongoing public outreach.
Laboratory Practice
The Town of Louisburg operates a laboratory for purposes of complying with state and federal
monitoring and sampling requirements. The laboratory is a potential source of small quantities of
mercury -containing compounds. Laboratory employees will be trained in the proper handling and
disposal of these materials. The laboratories have also replaced mercury thermometers with non -mercury
thermometers, whenever practical.
C. TRACKING AND MONITORING
In order to assess the implementation of the control measures, the Town of Louisburg proposes to
undertake the following evaluations beginning after the first full year that this MMP is implemented:
1. Survey annually at least ten percent (10°%) of any non -domestic users identified as
possible significant sources of mercury to the POTW;
2. Track the implementation of the programs outlined above;
3. Monitor influent mercury at least annually. Require significant non -domestic sources of
mercury to monitor periodically, as warranted; and
4. Measure effluent mercury as required by the NPDES permit.
These efforts will allow the Town of Louisburg to establish a baseline of influent and effluent mercury
levels to assist in identifying any trends in mercury contributions from domestic and non -domestic users
of the sewer system. This baseline will be tracked annually.
SECTION IV — IMPLEMENTATION OF CONTROL MEASURES
The Town of Louisburg will implement the control measures summarized in Section III over the permit
term and will update this MMP as warranted.
SECTION V - REPORTING
A summary of the MMP activities will be submitted as part of the NPDES permit renewal process.

NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Model Mercury Minimization Plan
Backtrround
The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Resources
(DENR), has issued a statewide total maximum daily load (TMDL) for mercury. The TMDL responds to
a statewide fish consumption advisory for mercury. The TMDL calls for a 67% reduction in mercury
levels from the year 2002 baseline mercury loading. The ultimate goal of the TMDL is to ensure safe -
levels of mercury in fish throughout North Carolina for human consumption.
As explained in the TMDL, 98 percent of mercury in North Carolina waters comes from atmospheric
sources — the vast majority of which are located outside of the State. Under the Clean Water Act,
atmospheric deposition of mercury into surface waters is regarded as a nonpoint source. Minor amounts
of mercury are discharged directly into surface waters by industrial and municipal point sources as a
group. Specifically, the TMDL determined that point sources contribute less than two (2) percent of the
annual mercury loadings to State waters. The TMDL allocates two percent of the statewide allowable
loadings collectively to the point source sector. This does not mean that an individual discharger may not
have significant levels of mercury in its discharge in terms of local water quality considerations. While
we expect such instances to be rare based upon the Department's review of statewide mercury data,
dischargers with higher mercury loadings will be expected to implement more aggressive mercury
controls.
Notably, unlike any other source, local governments actually reduce mercury loadings in the environment
by first filtering mercury out in the treatment of public drinking water (particularly where the source of
raw drinking water is surface water) and then a second time when wastewater is treated.
In order to implement the two percent point source sector wasteload allocation, the Department has
developed a point source permitting strategy which is located at
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wg/ps/mtu/tmdl/tmdls/mercua . The Environmental Management
Commission has approved both the TMDL and the Permitting Strategy. The permitting strategy calls for
certain point sources to develop and implement mercury minimization plans (MMPs). For POTWs, an
MMP will be required if the facility has (1) a permitted design capacity of more than two million gallons
per day and (2) mercury at quantifiable levels in their effluent. MMPs feature best management practices
and have been implemented successfully in numerous states around the country. The attached document
is [Utility namel's MMP.
Typically, MMPs focus on pretreatment controls — a local government's interaction with non -domestic
users of its sewer system as well as outreach to the public at large regarding the proper use and disposal of
household products containing mercury.
The MMP approach is intended as a reasonable, low-cost approach toward making some progress toward
managing the two percent loading statewide from point sources. Mercury treatment and even testing is
very expensive and does not make sense to reduce a small part of the already insignificant two percent
overall point source annual loading to State waters.

+.:,Aow� -CI fOLRNAL.- DATE RLIG-30- � TIME 12:20 *"
m,:,E - PETURY TRANSMISSION START=AUG-30 12:16 END-ROG-30 12:20
FILE ND.-823
STN CUM. ONE -TOUCH/ STATION NAIE/TEL NO. PACES DLRATION
NO. POSIR NO.
001 OK a 9197887159 013/013 130:02:46
-TOIJN OF Laum"G -
n.r.±a�»aw+K: v:wsowwrc*.rcw»:nx»*xwr --ww:.r� - 919 4% 6319- �tr*
.OUISBURG WRF
FAX COVER SHEET
F `,JF,: August 30, 2016
'TO: Mitch Hayes / Fax [phone]
FROM: Jimmy Ellington / Louisburg
PAGES tmcLunimccivrim: 13
C VYMENTS: ( 0
,41# 1016 PPA. J am also including the 2015 PPA because I do not think I sent it
in last year. I am aLo sending this info. to central riles as requested in my
I Any question call 919-496-2677. Thanks
9
tl1

4er-itech, Inc.
Environmental Laboratory
i
Laboratory Certification No. 165
Contact: Richard Collins
Report Date:
7/13/2016
Client: Louisburg, Town of
NPDES#:
NCO020231
110 West Nash St
Project:
PPA
Louisburg NC 27549
Date Sample Rcvd:
6/30/2016
Meritech Work Order # 06301683 Sample: Effluent Composite
6/29-30/16
Parameters
Result
Analysis Date
Reporting Limit
Method
Total Dissolved Solids
80 mg/L
7/1/16
10.0 mg/L
SM 2540C
Ammonia, Nitrogen
<0.1 mg/L
7/5/16
0.1 mg/L
EPA 350.1
TKN
1.26 mg/L
7/7/16
0.20 mg/L
EPA 351.1
Nitrate/Nitrite, Nitrogen
1.39 mg/L
7/1/16
0.10 mg/L
EPA 353.2
Nitrogen, total
2.65 mg/L
7/8/16
0.20 mg/L
EPA 353.2
Antimony, total
<0.025 mg/L
7/5/16
0.025 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Arsenic, total
<0.010 mg/L
7/5/16
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Beryllium, total
<0.005 mg/L
7/5/16
0.005 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Cadmium, total
<0.002 mg/L
7/5/16
0.002 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Chromium, total
<0.005 mg/L
7/5/16
0.005 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Copper, total
0.006 mg/L
7/5/16
0.002 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Lead, total
<0.010 mg/L
7/5/16
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Magnesium, total
2.40 mg/L
7/11/16
0.005 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Nickel, total
<0.010 mg/L
7/5/16
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Selenium, total
<0.010 mg/L
7/5/16
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Silver, total
<0.005 mg/L
7/5/16
0.005 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Thallium, total
<0.020 mg/L
7/5/16
0.020 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Phosphorus, total
0.174 mg/L
7/5/16
0.020 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Zinc, total
0.058 mg/L
7/5/16
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Hardness (titration)
32 mg/L
7/7/16
1 mg/L
SM 2340C
EPA 625
Attached
7/11/16
625
Meritech Work Order # 06301684 Sample: Effluent Grab
6/30/2016
Parameters
Result
Analysis Date
ReportingLimit imit
Method
Cyanide, total
<0.005 mg/L
7/1/16
0.005 mg/L
EPA 335.4
EPA 624
Attached
7/1/16
624
Oil & Grease (HEM)
<5 mg/L
7/2/16
5 mg/L
EPA 1664A
Phenols, total
0.032 mg/L
7/7/16
0.010 mg/L
EPA 420.1
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
642 Tamco Road, Reidsville, North Carolina 27320

ERI TECH, h v C.
Environmental Laboratories
+ R Laboratory Certification #165
Client: Louisburg Meritech ID#: 06301684
Project: PPA Analysis: 07/01/16
Client Sample ID: Effluent Analyst: VWV
Sample Collection: 06/30/16 Dilution Factor: I
Report Date: 07/06/16
EPA 624 VOLATILE ORGANICS
Parameter
Result
Benzene
< 1.00 ug/L
Dichlorobromomethane
< 1.00 ug/L
Bromoform
< 1.00 ug/L
Methyl Bromide
<5.00 ug/L
Carbon Tetrachloride
< 1.00 ug/L
Chlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
Chioroethane
< 5.00 ug/L
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
< 5.00 ug/L
Chloroform
< 1.00 ug/L
Methyl Chloride
< 5.00 ug/L
Chlorodibromomethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dibromoethane
< 1.00 ug/L
l,l-Dichloroethane
<1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
l,l-Dichloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichloropropane
< 1.00 ug/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene
< 1.00 ug/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene
< 1.00 ug/L
Ethyl ben; ene
< 1.00 ug/L
Methylene chloride
< 1.00 ug/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrachioroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
Tetrachloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
Toluene
< I.00 ug/L
l,l,l-Trichloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
Trichloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
Trichlorofluoromethane
<5.00 ug/L
Vinyl chloride
< 5.00 ug/L
Additional Compounds
Acrolein
<50.0 ug/L
Acrylonitrile
<10.0 ug/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road " Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph' [phone] Fax

MLRITECH, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
'
Laboratory Certificate #165
Client:
Louisburg Meritech ID#: 06301683
Project:
PPA Analysis: 06/11/16
Client Sample ID:
Effluent Extraction: 07/05/16
Sample Collection:
06/30/16 Analyst: PM
Dilution Factor: 1
EPA 625 SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS
Parameter Result Parameter Result
Acenaphthene
<10 ug(L
Fluoranthene
<10 ug/L
Acenaphthylene
<10 ug/L
Fluorene
<10 ug(L
Anthracene
<10 ug(L
Hexachlorobenzene
<10 ug(L.
Benzidine
<50 ug/L
Hexachlorobutadiene
<10 ug/L.
Benzo(a)anthracene
<10 ug(L
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
<50 ug/L
Benzo(a)pyrene
<10 ug/L
Hexachloroethane
<10 ug/L
3,4-Benzofluoranthene
<10 ug/L
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
<10 ug(L
Benzo(k)fluoramhene
<10 ug/L
lsophorone
<10 ug/L
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
<10 ug/L
2-Methylnaphthalene
<IO ug/L
Benzyl butyl phthalate
<10 ug(L
Naphthalene
<10 ug(L
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
<10 ug/L
Nitrobenzene
<10 ug(L
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
<10 ug(L
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
<10 ug/L
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
<10 ug(L
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
<10 ug/L
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
<10 ug(L
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
<10 ug/L
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
<10 ug(L
Phenanthrene
<10 ug/L
2-Chloronaphthalene
<10 ug(L
Pyrene
<10 ug(L
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
<10 ug(L
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
<10 ug(L
Chrysene
<10 ug(L
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
<10 ug/L
p-Chloro-m-cresol
<10 ug/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
<10 ug/L
2-Chlorophenol
<10 urf.,
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
<10 ug/L
2,4-Dichlorophenol
<10 ug(L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<10 ug/L
2,4-Dimethylphenol
<10 ug/L
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
<50 ug/L
2,4-Dinitrophenol
<50 ug/L
Diethyl phthalate
<10 ug/L
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
<50 ug/L
Dimethyl phthalate
<10 ug/L
2-Nitrophenol
<I0 ug(L
Di-n-butyl phthalate
<10 ug/L
4-Nitrophenol
<50 ug/L
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
<10 ug/L
Pentachlorophenol
<50 ug/L.
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
<10 ug/L
Phenol
<10 ug/L
Di-noctyl phthalate
<10 ug(L
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
<10 ug/L
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
<10 ug/L
i?
i
1 hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
�.
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road' Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph " [phone] Fax

MERITECH, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
Laboratory Certification No. 165
Client: Town of Louisburg WWTP Date Sampled 06/30/16
110 West Nash Street Digested 07/01/16
Louisburg, NC 27549 Analysis 07/12/16
Attention Richard Collins Analyst: CWL
NPDES#
EPA 1631 Low Level Mercury Analysis
Meritech ID #
Sample ID
Result
Reporting Limi[
MBLK0517DD
Method Blank
<0.5ng/L
0.5 ng/L
M07011605
Field Blank
< 1.0 ng/L
1.0 ng/L
M07011606
Effluent
1.99 ng/L
1.0 ng/L
I hereby certify that 1 have reviewed and approve these data.
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Rd - PO Box 27 - Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph - [phone] Fax
E-Mail: [e-mail]

law*t 0J
110 W. Nash St.
Louisburg, N.C. 27549
[phone]
[phone] Fax i I'
it
April 24, 2017
Mr. Danny Smith
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
DWR Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report Reply
Dear Mr. Smith:
J" L4 N*4a ear
I am writing you in response to your letter dated March 31, 2017. On March 10, 2017 a compliance
evaluation inspection of the Louisburg POTW was conducted by Cheng Zhang and Vanessa Manuel of
the Raleigh Regional Office (RRO). In this letter I would like to address the concerns by the two RRO
inspectors. The following concerns where noted:
A mercury minimization plan was not developed and implemented within 180 days of permit issuance.
This is something new to me, so I have been doing some research and making some phone calls to
educate myself on DWR expectation for this plan. I have been in contact with Teresa Rodriguez, who
provided me with a model of a MMP. I have started developing the plan. Once the plan is fully
developed and implemented, I will notify RRO in writing as your letter requested.
It was noted that one of the pH buffers (10.0 S.U.) was expired. This buffer was already on order and
was received after the inspection. The new buffer has an expiration date of June 2018.
It was noted that the effluent composite sampler was above the required 6.0 degrees Celsius or less.
We checked the temp. log book for this unit and had not had a problem until that day. Also, we have
not experienced a temp. problem since that day. In an effort to maintain full compliance we have
scheduled Clear water Inc. to run some diagnostics and determine if there is a problem and if so correct
z
n

the problem. We also have a backup refrigerated composite sampler on site if needed. At this time we
are still using the sampler that was inspected with no issues.
If you have any further questions or concerns, please contact me at [phone] or email:
[e-mail].
Town of Louisburg
WRF ORC
CC: Jonathan Franklin, Administrator
—A

RUG-30-2016 12:17 TOWN OF LOUISBURG 919 496 6319 P.01
LOUISBURG WRF
FAX COVER SHEET
DATE: August 30, 2016
TO: Mitch Hayes / Fax [phone]
FROM: Jimmy Ellington / Louisburg
PAGES (IN"VDINGCOVER): 13
COMMENTS:
Mitch, 2016 PPA. I am also including the 2015 PPA because I do not think I sent it
to you last year. I am also sending this info. to central tiles as requested in my
permit Any question call 919496-2677. Thanks

RUG-30-2016 12:17 TOWN OF LOUISBURG 919 496 6319 P.02
Meritech, Ir ,
Environmental Laboratory
Laboratory Certification No.165
Contact: Richard Collins
Report Date:
4/2/2015
Client: Louisburg, Town of
NPDES#:
NCO020231
110 West Nash St.
Louisburg NC 27549
Date Sample Rcvd:
3/12/2015
Meritech Work Order # 03121557 Sample:
Effluent Composite
3/11.12/15
Parameters
Result
Analysis; Date
Reporting Limit
Method
Total Dissolved Solids
239 mg/L
3/13/15
10.0 mg/L
SM 2540C
Ammonia, Nitrogen
<0.1 mg/L
3/16/15
0.1 mg/L
EPA 350.1
TKN
0.93 mg/L
3/17/15
0.20 mg/L
EPA 351.1
Nitrate/Nitrite, Nitrogen
2.02 mg/L
3/12/15
0.10 mg/L
EPA 353.2
Nitrogen, total
2.95 mg/L
3/17/15
0.20 mg/L
EPA 353.2
Antimony, total
<0.025 mg/L
3/17/15
0.025 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Arsenic, total
<0.010 mg/L
3/17/15
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Beryllium, total
<0.005 mg/L
3/17/15
0,005 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Cadmium, total
<0.002 mg/L
3/17/15
0.002 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Chromium, total
<0.005 mg/L
3/17/15
0.005 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Copper, total
0.009 mg/L
3/17/15
0.002 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Lead, total
<0.010 mg/L
3/17/15
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Magnesium, total
2.48 mg/L
3/18/15
0.005 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Nickel, total
<0.010 mg/L
3/17/15
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Selenium, total
<0.010 mg/L
3/17/15
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Silver, total
<0.005 mg/L
3/17/15
0.005 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Thallium, total
<0.020 mg/L
3/17/15
0.020 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Phosphorus, total
0.108 mg/L
4/2/15
0.020 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Zinc, total
0.068 mg/L
3/17/15
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Hardness (titration)
36 mg/L
3/19/15
1 mg/L
SM 2340C
EPA 625
Attached
3/18/1S
625
Meritech Work Order# 03121558 Sample:
Effluent Composite
3/12/2015
Parameters
Resul
Analysis Date
Reporting Limit
Method
Cyanide, total
<0.005 mg/L
3/23/15
0.005 mg/L
EPA 335.4
EPA 624
Attached
3/18/15
624
Oil & Grease (HEM)
<5 mg/L
3/16/15
5 mg/L
EPA 1664A
Phenols, total
0.204 mg/L
3/23/15
0.010 mg/L
EPA 420.1
1 hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
aboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road, Reidsville, North Carolina 27320
tel.[phone] fax[phone]

RUG-30-2016 12:17 TOWN OF LOUISBURG
919 496 6319 P.03
MER/TECH, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
Laboratory Certificate #165
Client:
Louisburg
Meritech ID#: 03121557
Project:
PPA
Analysis: 03/18/15
Client Sample ID:
Effluent
Extraction: 03/16/15
Sample Collection:
03/12/15
Analyst: PM
Dilution Factor: I
EPA 625 SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS
Parameter
Res I
Parameter
Result ,
Aoenaphthene
<10 ug/L
Fluoranthene
<10 ug/L
Acenaphthylene
<10 ug/L
Fluorene
<10 ug/L
Anthracene
<10 ug/L
Hexachlorobenzene
<10 ug/L
Benzidine
<50 ug/L
Hexachlorobutadiene
<10 ug/L
Benzo(a)anthracene
<10 ug/L
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
<50 ug/L
Benzo(a)pytene
<10 ug/L
Hexachloroethane
<10 ug/L
3,4-Benzofluoranthene
<10 ug/L
lndeno(1 ?,3-A)pyrene
<lo ug/L
Benzo(k)1luoranihene
<10 ug/L
Isophorone
<10 ug/L
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
<10 ug/L
2dvlethylnaphthalene
<10 ug/L
Benzyl butyl phthalate
<10 ug/L
Naphthalene
<10 ug/L
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
<10 ug/L
Nitrobenzene
<10 ug/L
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
<10 ug/L
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
<10 ug(L
Bis(2-chloroisapropyl)ether
<10 ug(L
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
<10 ug(L
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
< 10 ug/L
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
<10 ug/L
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
<10 ug/L
Phenantltrene
<10 ug/L
2-Chloronaphthalene
<10 ug/L
Pyrene
<10 ug/L
4-Chlorophcnyl phenyl ether
<I0 ug/L
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
<10 ug(L
Chryscnc
<t0 ug/L
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
<10 ug/L
p-Chloro-m-cresol
<10 ug/L
1,2-Diuhlorobcazenc
<10 ug/L
2-Chlorophenol
<10 ug/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
<10ug/L
2,4-Dichlorophenol
<toug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<10 ug/L
2,4-Dimethylphenol
<10 µg(L.
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
<50 ug/L
2,4-Dinitrophenol
<50 ug/L'
Diethyl phthalate
<10 ug/L
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
<50 ug/L
Dimethyl phthalate
<10 ug/L
2-Nitrophenol
<10 ug/L
Di-n-butyl phthalate
<10 ug/L
4-Nitrophenol
<50 ug/L
2,4-Dinilrotoluene
<10 ug/L
Pentachlorophenot
<50 uglL
2,6-Dinilrotolucne
<10 ug/L
Phenol
<10 ug/L
Di-n-ectylphthalate
<t0 ug/L
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
<to ug/L
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
<10 ug/L
I hereby certify that l have reviewed and approve these data. tL .107
Laboratory RcpreSentative
642 Tarnco Road' Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

RUG-30-2016 12:18
TOWN OF LOUISBURG
919 496 6319 P.04
Client:
Louisburg
Project:
PPA
Client Sample ID:
Effluent
Sample Collection:
03/12/15
MERITECH, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Meritech ID#: 03121558
Analysis:
03/19/15
Analyst:
VWV
Dilution Factor:
1
Report Date;
03/24/15
EPA 624 VOLATILE ORGANICS
ft7amet
Result
Benzene
< 1.00 ug/L
Dichlorobromomethane
< 1.00 ug/L
Bromoform
< 1.00 ug/L
Methyl Bromide
< 5.00 ug/L
Carbon Tetrachloride
< 1.00 ug/L
Chlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
Chloroed=e
<5.00 ug/L
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
< 5.00 ug/L
Chloroform
1.09 ug/L
Methyl Chloride
< 5.00 ug/L
Chlorodibromomethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dibromoethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,1-Dichloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
1.2-Dichlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
l,l-Dicbloroethylene
<1.00 ug/L
trans-la-Diehloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichloropropane
< 1.00 ug/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene
< 1.00 ug/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene
< 1.00 ug/L
Ethyl benzene
< 1.00 ug/L
Methylene chloride
< 1.00 ug/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
Tetrachloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
Toluene
< 1.00 ug/L
l,l,l-Tnchloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
Mrichloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
Trichlorofluoromethanc
<5.00 ug/L
Vinyl chloride
<5.00 ug/1.
Additional Compounds
Acrolein
<50.0 ug/L
Acrylonitrile
<10.0 ug/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
'4 .
koc
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax

Chain of Custody Record COC
Client: Louisburg
�
Address: ws-r�" eZ e [
( C
I / n /� /
Attention: ) Lf 42cH 1, o (li'0S
1
NPDES#: C60a/ea3
Phone:
Fax:
Ernall:
Project: PPA
PO a:
MERITECH INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Divislon of avatar Technology and Control, Inc. ,
7�J'a't
642 Tamco Rd Phone 1-a36-342-4746
Reidsville, NC Fax: "36-342-1522
27320 Email: wtelatiftellsouth.net
ww.
Web Site: wmeritech-labs.com
Turn roun Time
Std (10 da s)
I
3- 5 Day
0
?A • 4e Hr
0
Sample
Locatlon/lD #
Sampling pates & Times
Person Taking Sample Signature): IT, 0/-
Lab Use Only
START
END
Camp?
Grab?
ea
Cants.
Tests Required
q
On
Ice? �
p"OK?
C12 CK?
Dale
e
W
mo
fluent
ti {�
A rq ah
�3 I�
IS
/000
C
3
,
TDS, 625
C
1
NH3, Ntot ( H2SO4)
-;
C
1
11 i J�/
Metals - Sb,As,Be,6d,dr,du,pb,Ni,Se,A ,
TI,Zn, Mg,Hardness,Ptot (wl HNO3)
fluent
p3
/00
G
2
Cyanide wlNaOH ,Oil B�Grease (wJHC!)
��S
alb
G
3
614 ( w/HCI
G
1
i
Phenols wlH2SO4 & CuSO4
d of Shipment:
Comments:
LLHg on Separate COC
UPS
Fed Ex
liantl Delivery
Other
.
Will these results he used for regulatory purposes? "RUSH work must be approved prior to submitting samples.
Yes No AP A 9 A
Relinquished by: lam- D le:
d i �
/Time;. Recelr y; Dale'. Time:
IS I Q S `- - . �
Rahn shed by: - Date: I g Received y: Date: Time:
`92 -%?
Rennqul d by: Date: Ttms: Recelyed at lab by: Data: Tim:
- I
O

RUG-30-2016 12:18
TOWN OF LOUISBURG
919 496 6319 P.06
MERITECH, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
Laboratory Certification No. 165
Client: Town of Louisburg W WTP Date Sampled 03/24/15
110 West Nash Street Digested 03/25/I5
Louisburg, NC 27549 Analysis 04/09/15
Attention Richard Collins Analyst: SMc
NPDES#
EPA 1631 Low Level Mercury Analysis
Meritech ID #
Sample ID
Result
Reoortine Limit
MBLK0416M
Method Blank
< 0.5 ngfL
0.5 ng/L
M03251509
Field Blank
< 1.0 ng/L
1.0 ng/L
M03291510
Effluent
5.92 ag/L.
1.0 ng/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
L.&
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Rd - PO Box 27 - Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph - [phone] Fax
E-Mail: [e-mail]

m
M
to
Lo
v
in
ON
m
N
ti
Womn Chain of Custody Record (COC)
Client: ft�2a(N��i. �i�J?
NPDESM:
MERITECH 1NCe
Phone:
d
Address:
Fax:
Email:
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
Project:
642TamooRd. Phone:[phone]
ReidAlleNC27320 Fax:[phone]
P.OX:
Attention:
How would you like your Report sent?
Email: [e-mail]
www.meritech-labs.com
Circle all that apply: Email (preferred), Fax, Mail
EPA 1631
PersonTakingSample(Sggn/Print):�
L r�rr� �
� nL L�p/✓�
Sample Location / ID A
Date
Time
Sampling Site Description
U�1ng'
Sansplkr
Field Blank
!r
_
z
'14 it
Method of
comments:
Shipment:
UPS
Fed Ex
Are these results fd regulatory purposes? Y s EJ No
Hand Delivery
Re li dui i Da. Time: v
i
ReceNed by: Date: time
c %d %.'�
Other
Relinquished by; Date: Time:
Received by: Date: Tlme:
Relinquished by. Date: Time:
" dhy
`l ate; Ti e:
RL'a L L.cj AM Received from Lab SeCdre Area

AUG-30-2016 12:19 TOWN OF LOUISBURG 919 496 6319 P.08
Meritech, In
Environmental Laboratory
Laboratory Certiflcation No. 165
Contact: Richard Collins
Client: Louisburg, Town of
110 West Nash St.
Louisburg NC 27549
Report Date: 7/13/2016
NPDES#: NCO020231
Project: PPA
Date Sample Rcvd: 6/30/2016
Meritech Work Order #
06301683 Sample: Effluent Composite
6/29-30/16
Parameters
Result
AnalysisDate
Reporting Limit
Method
Total Dissolved Solids
80 mg/L
7/1/16
10.0 mg/L
SM 2540C
Ammonia, Nitrogen
4.1 mg/L
7/5/16
0.1 mg/L
EPA 350.1
TKN
1.26 mg/L
7/7/16
0.20 mg/L
EPA 351.1
Nitrate/Nitrite, Nitrogen
1.39 mg/L
7/1/16
0.10 mg/L
EPA 353.2
Nitrogen, total
2.65 mg/L
7/8/16
0.20 mg/L
EPA 353.2
Antimony, total
<0.025 mg/L
7/5/16
0.025 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Arsenic, total
<0.010 mg/L
7/5/16
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Beryllium, total
<0.005 mg/L
7/5/16
0.005 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Cadmium, total
<0.002 mg/L
7/5/16
0.002 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Chromium, total
<0.005 mg/L
7/5/16
0.005 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Copper, total
0.006 mg/L
7/5/16
0.002 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Lead, total
<0.010 mg/L
7/5/16
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Magnesium, total
2.40 mg/L
7/11/16
0.005 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Nickel, total
<0.010 mg/L
7/5/16
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Selenium, total
<0.010 mg/L
7/5/16
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Silver, total
<0.005 mg/L
7/5/16
0.005 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Thallium, total
<0.020 mg/L
7/5/16
0,020 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Phosphorus, total
0.174 mg/L
7/5/16
0.020 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Zinc, total
0.058 mg/L
7/5/16
0,010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Hardness (titration)
32 mg/L
7/7/16
1 mg/L
S1+4 2340C
EPA 625
Attached
7/11/16
625
Meritech Work Order #
06301684 Sample: Effluent Grab
6/30/2016
Parameters
Result
Analysis Date
Reporting_ Limit
method
Cyanide, total
<0.005 mg/L
7/1/16
0.005 mg/L
EPA 335.4
EPA 624
Attached
7/1/16
624
Oil & Grease (HEM)
<5 mg/L
7/2/16
5 mg/L
EPA 1664A
Phenols, total
0.032 mg/L
7/7/16
0,010 mg/L
EPA 420.1
I hereby cerd' that I have reviewed and approve these data.
642 Tamco Road, Reidsville, North Carolina 27320
tP1.f�ZF7R49-d9dR fav rZ7A1QA7.1 c99

RUG-30-2016 12:19 TOWN OF LOUISBURG 919 496 6319 P.09
Client:
Project:
Client Sample ID:
Sample Collection:
Parameter
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthraeene
Benzo(a)pyrene
3,4-Benzofluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzyl butyl phthalate
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
Bis(2chloroethyl)ether
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
2-Chloronaphthalene
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
3,T-Dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Dim-octyl phthalate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
MER/TECH, 114C.
Environmental Laboratories
Laboratory Certificate #165
Louisburg
Meritech ID#:
06301683
PPA
Analysis:
06/11/16
Effluent
Extraction:
07/05/16
06/30/16
Analyst:
PM
Dilution Factor:
1
EPA 625 SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS
Result
parameter
Result
<10 ug/L
Fluoranthene
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
Fluorene
QO ug/L
<10 ug/L
Hexachlorobenzene
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
Hexachlorobutadiene
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
Hexachlorocyolopentadicne
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
Hexachloroethane
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
Isophorone
<10 up/L.
<10 ug/L
2-Methylnaphthalene
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
Naphthalene
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
Nitrobenzene
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
<10 upIL
<10 ug/L
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
Phenanthrene
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
Pyrene
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
p-Chloro-m-cresol
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
2-Chlorophenol
ao ug/L
<10 ug/L
2,4-Dichlorophenol
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
2,4-Dimethylphenol
<10 ug/L
<50 ug/L
2,4-Dinitrophenol
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
2-Nitrophenol
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
4-Nitrophenol
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
Pentachlorophenol
<50 ug/L
<10 ug/L
Phenol
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
2,4,6-1'richlorophenol
<10 ug/L
<10 ug/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
d-Ar'la
Laboratory Representative
642 Tarneo Road Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph' [phone] Fax

AUG-30-2016 12:19 TOWN OF LOUISBURG 919 496 6319
.Tt
MERI TECH, i, d C.
Environmental Laboratories
Laboratory Certification #165
Client:
Louisburg
Meritech 1D#:
06301684
Project:
PPA
Analysis:
07/01/16
Client Sample ID:
Effluent
Analyst:
VWV
Sample Collection:
06/30/16
Dilation Factor:
1
ReportDate:
07/06/16
EPA 624 VOLATILE ORGANICS
Parameter
Result
Benzene
< 1.00 ug/L
Dichlorobromomethane
< 1.00 ug/L
Bromoform
< 1.00 ug/L
Methyl Bromide
< 5.00 ug/L
Carbon Tetrachloride
< 1,00 ug/L
Chlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
Chloroethane
< 5.00 ug/L
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
< 5.00 ug/L
Chloroform
< 1.00 ug/L
Methyl Chloride
<5.00 ug/L
Chlorodibromomethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dibromoethane
< 1.00 ug/L
%I-Dichloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,4-Diohlorobencene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,1-Dichloroethylene
< 1,00 ug/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichloropropane
< 1.00 ug/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene
< 1.00 ug/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene
< 1.00 ug/L
Ethyl benzene
< 1.00 ug/1.
Methylene chloride
< 1.00 ug/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
Tetrachloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
Toluene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
<1.00 ug/L
1,1,2-Trichloroathane
< 1.00 ug/L
Trichloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
Trichlorofluoromethane
<5.00 ug/L
Vinyl chloride
< 5.00 ug/L
Additional Compounds
Acrolein
<50.0 ug/L
Acrylonitrile
<10.0 ug/L
I hereby certify that
I have reviewed and approve these data.
ff^
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road' Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph' [phone] Fax
P.10

a
D�
LO
LD
m
v
m
m
crJ
m
to
D
O
J
u_
O
Z
3
O
F
LD
0
N
CE
rl
I
CE
Chain of Custody Record COC
Client:
Address:
Attention:
Louisburg
110 p• i 15-T d rs( S 1
NIt ,.5 - _t
d ,', Z, e ("O I lnLS
NPDESM l C--rt):}-J_�
Phone:
Fax:
Email:
Project: PPA
PO
MERITECH INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Watem Tech..Wii and Cootml, tnc.
642 Tamco Rd Phone [phone]
Reidsville, NC Fax: [phone]
27320 Email wtc labAbel lsouth. net
Web Site. www.moritech-labs.com
Turn Around Time*
Std (Io days)
©
3 -5 Day
_>
24 - 48 Hr
Sample
LocationllD #
Sampling Dates & Times
Person Taking Sample (Signature): W - It "11J II
Lab Use Only
START
END
Comp?
Oiab?
riot
gents-
Tests Required
On
ica?
pH OK?
C12 OK?
Date
Time
Date
me
C
3
TDS,625
J
C
1
NH3, Ntot (H2SO4 )
+
C
1
Metals - Sb,As,Be,Cd,Cr,Cu,Pb,Ni,Se,A ,
TI,Zn, Mg, Hardness, plot wl HNO3
fluent
o iv
ic' I�
�� l)
G
2
Cyanide (w1Na0H ), Oil & Grease (wIHCI)
(
G
3
624 ( wlHCl )
G
1
Phenols (w1H2SO4 & CuSO4)
�d of Shipment:
Comments:
LLHg on Separate
COC
UPS
] Fed Ex
] Hand Delivery
]Other
Will these results be used for regulatory purposes?
Yes Ho
*RUSH work must be approved prior to
submitting samples.
Relinqulahed by; �. {`\ pats: Ttme: R"Wed I Date: Time:
Relinquls hed y: Date: Time: Received by: Data:
�` i, c<s c� �,t' .S� ') P
Time:
Relinquishedby: Date; Time: Re" d^ ieb ry: - /,_Date:J / + rimer

RUG-30-2016 12:19
TOWN OF LOUISBURG
919 496 6319 P.12
MERITECH, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
Laboratory Certification No 165
Client: Town of Louisburg WWTP Date Sampled 06/30/16
110 West Nash Street Digested 07/01/36
Louisburg, NC 27549 Analysis 07/12/16
Attention Richard Collins Analyst: CWL
NPDES#
EPA 1631 Low Level Mercury Analysis
Meritech 11) #
Sample ID
Result
Reoortin < imit
MBLK0517DD
Method Blank
< 0.5 ng/L
0.5 ng/L
M07011605
Field Blank
< 1.0 ng/L
1.0 ng/L
M07011606
Effluent
1,99 ng/L
1.0 ng/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
f Dld
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Rd - PO Box 27 - Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph - [phone] Fax
E-Mail: [e-mail]

K
to
7
O
O
3
F
uo
..
N
I
CS)
M
Lo
Chain of Custody Record (COC)
Client:—f0V-V1 L�YAtAri
NPDES#:
Phone:
n �y��Cr��
`V' R( NC.
\$bura
)
Address: L v
Fax:
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
Email:
Project:
: ACF 1 642 Tamcu Rd. Phone: [phone]
Reidsville NC 27320 Fax: [phone]
P.O.#:
Attention:
How would you like your Report sent?
Email: [e-mail]
Circle all that apply: Email (preterredl, Fax, Mail
www.meritech-labs.com EPA 1631
personTal;ingSarnple{Sign/printl:///n`.
Sample Location / ID k
Date
Time
Sampling Site Description
•-
-
-
>ZStit
=i,alri Blank
�r3o
a : r2.
1,;.. __ , �?7
_N<
_�a;x�.�'
�f�1ue�
C(3ar
•.�
II �
����-�«
- �4�}�+��Y�.
_-_-:_��.
a=!
`-iK
x'vf a--$e
' P
-)`"-'Y�ai..t�aa��. �
_ _ ..Yam •
_ _
.a.
a�..:
�.s
-I-'du
--.c
w=
�_ _
..
v
Method of
Comments:
Shipment:
y .
UPS
L ��v, D2niC. _'-—�la-•,%li%G,,,,t
Fed Ex
Are these resul for regulatory purposes? V Yes No
Hand Delivery
Rellj�qul ed bV- ale: DTme:-,�-
, - �� _�,� r. _ • ,• I
Received by: Dale. Time:
Relinquished by: Date: Time:
Received by: Dale: Time:
Other
t
Relinquished by: Date: lime:
Receivedbytab: r i/ Date: Time:
Fri*ased to Lab Serum Area Rec&Od frorri Lab Secure Area �a9

United Slates Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Mahington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 6-31-96
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yrlmolday Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
IN I 2 IS I 3 I NC0020231 I11 121 16/03/09 117 161r1 19 Lsi 20I I
�6
211 f6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 CA—Reserved
671
I 70LJI 71 L72 )-j 73I 174 75L_L_L_ L
80
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also inGude
Entry TimelDate
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
09:15AM 16103/09
16/03/01
Tar River Water Reclamation Facility WWiP
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
Wastewater Dr
11:00AM 16/03/09
19/09130
Louisburg NC 27549
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)Mtles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Date
Name, Address of Responsible Offloal[Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Kad T Parnell, 110 W Nash St Louisburg NC 27549/Mayor/919-496-3405/9194966319
Yes
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement operations & MaintenancE Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring. Program Sludge Handling Disposal Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Eri Deck RRO WO//919-791-4200/ t
�l&
SJaw,f Managemen A Ravi er Agency/O /Phone eird Fax Numbers Datete
i
EPA Form 35 -3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page#

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
31 NCO020231 I11 12 16/03/09 17 18 I c
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Permit became effective on 3/1/2016. Influent and effluent flow meters were last calibrated in August
2015. Facility is in the process of updating their PLC. Backup generators are available on site, and
can run the entire plant. Class B solids are collected and land applied by Granville farms. To prevent
algal growth the weirs are covered as well as the tertiary filters. Maintenance is performed regularly.
Effluent was clear and no foam at time of inspection.
Page#

Permit: NCN20231
Inspection Date: 0310912016
Owner- Facility: Tar River Water Reclamation Facility W ATP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
Yes
No
NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
❑
❑
0
❑
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
M
❑
❑
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
0
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable M ❑ ❑ ❑
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Bar Screens
Yes
No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
❑
b.Mechanical
❑
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the unit in good condition?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Influent
Yes No
NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is flaw meter calibrated annually?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
0
❑
❑
❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Calibrated August 2015
Influent Sampling Yes No NA NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Is sample collected above side streams? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 3

Perri NCO020231 Owner- Faculty: Tar River Water Reclamation Facility WWTP
Inspection Date: 03/09/2016 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Influent Sampling
Yes
No NA NE
Is proper volume collected?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is the tubing clean?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees
0
❑
❑
❑
Celsius)?
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
M
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Nutrient Removal
Yes No NA NE
# Is total nitrogen removal required?
0 ❑
❑
❑
# Is total phosphorous removal required?
M ❑
❑
❑
Type
Biological
# Is chemical feed required to sustain process?
❑ M❑
❑
Is nutrient removal process operating properly?
M ❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Flow Measurement- Effluent
Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
0
❑
❑
❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Calibrated August 2015
Disinfection - UV
Yes No NA NE
Are extra UV bulbs available on site?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are UV bulbs dean?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is UV intensity adequate?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is transmittance at or above designed level?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is there a backup system on site?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is effluent clear and free of solids?
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 4

Permit: NCO020231
Inspection Date: 03/09/2016
Owner -Facility: Tar River Water Reclamation Facility WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Sampling
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
Is proper volume collected?
Is the tubing clean?
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees
Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type
representative)?
Comment.
Yes No
NA
NE
•
❑
❑
❑
•
❑
❑
❑
M
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 5

Meritech, Ini...
Environmental Laboratory
Laboratory Certification No. 165
Contact: Richard Collins
Report Date:
4/2/2015
Client: Louisburg, Town of
NPDES#:
NCO020231
110 West Nash St.
Louisburg NC 27549
Date Sample Rcvd:
3/12/2015
Meritech Work Order # 03121SS7 Sample:
Effluent Composite
3/11-12/15
Parameters
Result
Analysis Date
Reporting Limit
Method
Total Dissolved Solids
239 mg/L
3/13/15
10.0 mg/L
SM 2540C
Ammonia, Nitrogen
<0.1 mg/L
3/16/15
0.1 mg/L
EPA 350.1
TKN
0.93 mg/L
3/17/15
0.20 mg/L
EPA 351.1
Nitrate/Nitrite, Nitrogen
2.02 mg/L
3/12/15
0.10 mg/L
EPA 353.2
Nitrogen, total
2.95 mg/L
3/17/15
0.20 mg/L
EPA353.2
Antimony, total
<0.025 mg/L
3/17/15
0.025 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Arsenic, total
<0.010 mg/L
3/17/15
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Beryllium, total
<0.005 mg/L
3/17/15
0.005 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Cadmium, total
<0.002 mg/L
3/17/15
0.002 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Chromium, total
<0.005 mg/L
3/17/15
0.005 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Copper, total
0.009 mg/L
3/17/15
0.002 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Lead, total
<0.010 mg/L
3/17/15
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Magnesium, total
2.48 mg/L
3/18/15
0.005 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Nickel, total
<0.010 mg/L
3/17/15
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Selenium, total
<0.010 mg/L
3/17/15
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Silver, total
<0.005 mg/L
3/17/1S
0.005 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Thallium, total
<0.020 mg/L
3/17/15
0.020 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Phosphorus, total
0.108 mg/L
4/2/15
0.020 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Zinc, total
0.068 mg/L
3/17/15
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Hardness (titration)
36 mg/L
3/19/15
1 mg/L
SM 2340C
EPA 625
Attached
3118111
625
Meritech Work Order # 03121558 Sample:
Effluent Composite
3/12/2015
Parameters
Result
Analysis Date
Reportine limit
Method
Cyanide, total
<0.005 mg/L
3/23/15
0.005 mg/L
EPA 335.4
EPA 624
Attached
3/18/15
624
Oil & Grease (HEM)
<S mg/L
3/16/15
5 mg/L
EPA 1664A
Phenols, total
0.204 mg/L
3/23/15
0.010 mg/L
EPA 420.1
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
aboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road, Reidsville, North Carolina 27320
tel.f3361342-474R fav fZ2A1'147- 1 C77

*-.M��iw
MCRI TECH, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
Laboratory Certificate #165
Client:
Louisburg
Merited IN;
03121557
Project:
PPA
Analysis:
03/18/15
Client Sample ID:
Effluent
Extraction:
03/16/15
Sample Collection:
03,112/15
Analyst:
PM
Dilution Factor:
I
EPA 625 SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS
Paramcicr
Result
Parameter
Result
Acenaphthene
<10 ug/L.
Fluorandiene
<10 ug/L
Acenaphthylene
<10 ug/L
Fluorene
<10 ug/L
Anthracene
<10 ug/L
Hexachlorobenzene
<10 ugfL
Benzidine
<50 ug/L
Hexachlorobutadiene
<10 ug/L
Benzotalanlhracene
<10 ug/L
Hexachlorocyclopenladiene
<50 ug/L
Benzo(a)pyTene
<10 ug!L
Ilexachloroethane
<10 uWL
3,441enzotlunramliene
<10 ug/L
htdeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
<10 ug/L
Benzo(k)Buoamthene
<10 ugA.
Isophorone
<10 ug/L
Benzo(g.11,011cylene
<I0 ug/L.
2-Meth)Inaphthalene
<10 ug4.
Benzyl butyl phthalate
<10 ugIl.
Naphthalene
<10 ug/L
Bisl2-chloroethoxy)melhane
<10 ug/L
Nitrobenzene
<10 ug/L
Bist'_-chloruethyl)ether
<10 ug'L
N-Mirosodimelhylamine
<10 ugiL
Bis(2-chioroisopropyl)cthcr
<10 ug/L
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
<10 ug'L
Bis(2-cthylhexygphthalatc
<: 10 ug/L
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
<10 ug/L
4-Bromophen)l phenyl ether
<10 ug/L.
Phenanthrene
<10 ug/L
2-Chloronaphlhalene
<I0 ug/L
Pyrenc
<10 ug/L
4-Chlomphenyl phenyl ether
<10 ug/L
1,14=fichlorobenzene
<10 ug9.
Chrysene
<10 ug/L
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracete
<10 ug/L
p-Chloro-m-cresol
<10 ug/L.
12-Dichlorobenz-ene
<10 ug/L.
2-Chlorophenol
<10 uWL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
<I0 ug'L
2.4-Dichlorophenol
<10 uWL
IA-Dichlorobenzene
<10 ug/L.
2,4-Dimethylphenol
<I0 ug/L
3.3-Dichlorobenzidine
<:50 ugIL
2.4-Dinitrophenol
<50 ugil.
Diethyl phthalate
<10 ug/L
4.6-13initro-o-cresol
<50 ug/L
DimeOnl phthalate
-,10 ugil-
2-Nitrophenol
<10 ug/L
Di-n-hmyl phthalate
<10 ug/L
4-Nitrophenol
<50 ug/L
2,4-13mitrololucne
<10 ug/L
Pentachlorophenob
<50 ug/L
2,6-Dinitroteluune
<10 ug/L
Phenol
<.10 ug/L
Di-n-octyl phthahnc
<:10 ug/L.
2.4.6=rrichlorophenol
<10 ug/L
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
<10 ug/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data. 14 ,
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road " Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph ' [phone] Fax

MERI TECH, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A Division of Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Client: Louisburg Meritech IN: 03121558
Project: PPA Analysis: 03/18/15
count Sutttptc rn: Mount Analyst: Vv/V
Sample Collection: 03/12/15 Dilution Factor: I
Report Date: 03/24/15
EPA 624 VOLATILE ORGANICS
Parameter
Result
Benzene
< 1.00 ug/L
Dichlorobromomethane
< 1.00 ug/L
Bromoform
< 1.00 ug/L
Methyl Bromide
<5.00 ug/L
Carbon Tetrachloride
< 1.00 ug/L
Chlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
Chloroethane
< 5.00 ug/L
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
< 5.00 ug/L
Chloroform
1.09 ug/L
Methyl Chloride
<5.00 ug/L
Chlorodibromomethane
<. 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dibromoethane
< 1.00 ug/L
I,I-Diehloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Diehloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
<. 1.00 ug/L
[,I-Dichloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
1.2-Dichloropropane
< 1.00 ug/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene
< 1.00 ug/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene
< 1.00 ug/L
Ethyl benzene
< 1.00 ug/L
Methylene chloride
< 1.00 ug/L
I,I 2,2-Tetrachloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
Tetrachloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
Toluene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,1,2-Trichloroetlrane
< 1.00 ug/L
Trichloroethylene
< I ug/L
Trichlorolluaromethane
< 5.00 ug/L
Vinyl chloride
< 5.00 ug/L
Additional Cormrounds
Acrolein
<50.0 ugil-
Acrylonitrile
- 10.0 ug/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road' Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph ' [phone] Fax

L.nain nr c :aaetnei.. ope. .A
"yvrM �v�
NPDES#: CO�,�O�,$
IMERITECH INC.
Environmental Laboratories
Client:
Louisburg Phone: 2Z2- L �j(/
A Division of Water Technology and ContrAol, Inc.
Address:
Fax:
[,4"S%"� S s� j
k i
Email:
642 Tamco Rd
Phone [phone]
ef ts',6ra c Project: PPA
Reidsville, NC
Fax: [phone]
Po#
27320
Email: wtclab(c bellsouth net
Attention:
1 p n /1 Turn Around Time"
�t CI�r�Cc.+' `O ��i d1,S
Web Site: www.meritech-labs com
/ Slid (10 days) 3 - 5 Day 24 - 48 Hr
c"y
Sample
Sampling Dates & Times
e� o e�
Person �H
Taking
Sample (Signature): Lab Use Only
cation/ID #
START END
Comp? aot
Date Time Date Time
Grab? Donts.
Tests Required On pH OK?
ee?t ctsoK?
:ffluent
(� j ��'�� ©3 I IS %�
C 3
.'
TDS,
625 5
C 1
NH3, Ntot ( H2SO4) .
C 1
Metals - S6,As,13e,Cd,dr,Cu,15b,Ni,Se,Ag,
TI,Zn, Mg,Hardness,Ptot (w/ HNO3)
ffluent
�3 �pi�0
G 2
Cyanide (w/NaOH ), Oil & Grease (w/HCI) <�-
�. a •,
G 3
614 (w/HCI )
Comments:
G 1
Phenols (w/H2SO4 & CuSO4)
Ahod of Shipment:
LLHg on Separate COC
7 UPS
Will these results be used for regulatory purposes?
Fed Ex
Yes No
'RUSH work must be approved prior to submitting samples.
Hand Delivery
RetinquisMtl by: I\ D te:
Tim¢`
t
Recely Date: ,7 Time:
/05
Dther
Y G L % ate
Relin sMb 1�
I ¢:
`y
Receivetl y: Date: Time:
RellnquisM
by: Dale:
Time:
Received at tab by- ; Data: Time:

MERI TECH, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
i
Laboratory Certification No. 165
Client: Town of Louisburg W WTP Date Sampled 03/24/15
110 West Nash Street Digested 03/25/15
Louisburg, NC 27549 Analysis 04/09/15
Attention Richard Collins Analyst: SMc
NPDES#
EPA 1631 Low Level Mercury Analysis
Meritech ID N
Sample ID
Result
Reporting Limit
MBLK0416M
Method Blank
< 0.5 ng/L
0.5 ng/L
M03251509
field Blank
< 1.0 ng/L
1.0 ng/L
M03251510
Effluent
5.92 ng/L
1.0 ng/L
1 hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Rd - PO Box 27 - Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph - [phone] Fax
E-Mail: [e-mail]

0 0„ unaln of Custody Record (COC) NPDES#:
MERITECH, IIYC� Client: d; , vv. iw- i,/n ' Phone:
Address: Fax:
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES Email:
642 Tamco Rd. Phone: [phone] Project:
Reidsville NC 27320 Fax: [phone] P 0 #:
Email: [e-mail] Attention: How would you like your Report sent?
www.meriteCh-labs.com Circle all that apply: Email (preferred), Fax, Mail
EPA 1631 Person Taking Sample (Sign/Print): i
mple Location /ID p Date Time Sampling Site Description Bo 16 Tubing Sampler 245.1 Result (VPt) In House Cooler
Lot # Lot # CH/DH Preservation #
Field Blank J
Method Of
Shipment:
Comments:
Are these results f regulatory pdrposes? 4s ❑ No ❑
Reliq uish� yy'��� / �
/.— � Wl-u� . ,n Datyi ,Time:
�IV1\. j j'
Relinquished by: Dale: Time
Relinquished by: Date: Time:
Received by: Date: Time:
Received by: Date: Time:
e 1. : e
d by L bZV _ t,pate:` ]me:
❑ UPS
❑ Fed Ex
❑
Hand Delivery
Other—_
❑
—
--_
L.j
rt; . Received from i_ab Sccd e ,;,;

Aug 12 14 09:53a ImLli.sburg Water Reclamati 91949E2883
LOUISBURG WRF
FAX COVER SHEET
DATE: 8-12-2014
TO: MITCH HAVES / NCDENR
FROM: JIMMY ELLINGTON I
LOUISBURG
PAGES (INCLUDING COVER): 3
COMMENTS:
MITCH,
/%- %�. 1/S5
COPY OF THE LOUISBURG WWTP ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT. I
SENT THIS TO YOU LAST YEAR AND I AM ASSUMING YOU MAY STILL BE
MY INSPECTER I CONTACT THIS YEAR A COPY HAS BEEN SENT TO
CENTRAL FILES AND WILL BE PUBLISHED IN THE FRANKLIN TIMES
FOR PUBLIC NOTICE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONTACT ME AT
919496-2677.
Y I�E�' IS`►1I

Aug 12 14 09:53a '-••`.sburg Water Reclamati 9194962883 p.2
Louisburg Wastewater Treatment Plant
Perfortnance Annual Report
July 1, 2013 —June 30, 2014
I. General Information
Facility Name: Louisburg Wastewater Treatment Plant
Responsible Entity: Town of Louisburg
Person in Charge/Contact: Jimmy Ellington, Plant Superintendent 919-496-2677
Applicable Permits:
NPDES Permit No. NCO020231 (Wastewater Discharge)
General Permit No. NC G110000 (Stormwater Discharge)
Non -Discharge Permit No. WQ0005981 (Biosolids Land Appliction)
Non -Discharge Permit No. WQ0019992 (Conjunctive Reclaimed Water System)
Treatment Process Description
The Louisburg W WTP is an extended aeration system with a permitted treatment
capacity of 1,370,000 gallons per day. It consists of influent screening and grit /grease
removal, an anaerobic mixing zone, two oxidation ditches, two secondary clarifiers, three
tertiary filters, ultraviolet disinfection, cascade aeration, two aerobic digesters and one
effluent reuse station (currently unused).
II. Performance
The Louisburg W WTP facility was compliant throughout the entire twelve month period
with no violations. The facility operated well within design efficiency with some
mechanical breakdowns, but all malfunctions were corrected as needed.
The table below shows plant performance in relationship with NPDES permit limits.
LOUISGURG WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EFFLUENT (DISCHARGE WATER) ANALYSIS
Parameter Summer Winter
NPDES Limits
Actual Values
Averse
NPDES Limits
Actual Values
Average
kHE��]�
6.0 to 9.0 s.u.
6.65-7.50 s.u.
6.0 to 9.0 s.u.
6.73-7.74 s.u.
CBOD5 200 C
8.0 mg/L
2.23mg/1
16.0 mg/L
2.38mg/l
Ammonia
Nitrogen
3.0 mg/L
0.20mg/l
6.0 mg/L
0.34mg/l
Total
Suspended
Residue
30 mg/L
5.63mg/1
30 mg/L
8.94mg/1
Fecal Coliform
200/100 ml
43.39/100m1
200/100 ml
2.20/100m1
Dissolved
Oxygen
5.0 mg/L
minimum
7.94mg/l
5.0 mg/L
minimum
9.59mg/l

Aug 12 14 09:53a
I sburg
Water Reclamati
9194RS2883 p.3
Flow
1.37 MGD
0.6285MGD
1.37 MGD
0.62 GD
111. Notification
This report will be published in the Franklin Times Newspaper.
W. Certification
I certify under penalty of law that this report is complete and accurate to the best of my
knowledge. t further certify that this report has been made available to the users or
customers qr the nameyd system and that those users have been notified of its availability.
Date
Town of Louisburg
f�2-;0/r

110 W. Nash St
Louisburg, N.C. 27549
Office of the Town Administrator
►III
March 11, 2014
NPDES Permit Unit
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Re: Speculative NPDES Permit Limits
Tar River Water Reclamation Facility
NPDES Permit No. 0020231
Louisburg, North Carolina
NPDES Permit Unit:
sty o< No44 e"OL�ma
Please accept this as formal request for speculative NPDES Permit Limits for the Tar River
Water Reclamation Facility in Louisburg at the following flow rates:
1.75 MGD
2.00 MGD
2.50 MGD
3.00 MGD
3.50 MGD
Please let me know if you need any information from the Town of Louisburg to grant this
request.
Sincerely,
AXIII I —
Mark R. Warren
Town Administrator
cc: Danny Smith, Raleigh Regional Office, 1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
[phone] • FAX [phone]

laaw IV
�
110 W. Nash St.
Louisburg, N.C. 27549
[phone]
[phone] Fax
December 02, 2013
Mr. Danny Smith
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Division of Water Resources
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
DEC - 3 20i3
sty 0f )V&4A e
Subject: Response to Compliance Evaluation Inspection Letter
Dated October 31, 2013
Dear Mr. Smith
I am writing in response to your follow up letter dated October 31, 2013 to the inspection of
the Louisburg POTW on October 23, 2013. In your letter the Town was asked to outline future
plans to address the concerns about the POTW PLC (programmable logic controller). This PLC
controls automation within the POTW. The existing PLC is fully operational and functioning
properly at this time. However, the PLC is over 20 years old and parts for the system are
obsolete and no longer obtainable. The Town is in the process of planning for the replacement
of the PLC in the fiscal year 2014-2015. The Town is exploring funding opportunities to
incorporate in the budget.
The Town has already begun obtaining estimates from contractors that will meet the
Louisburg POTW needs and the Towns expectations. This upgrade would include new wiring,
hardware, programming and training among any other needs.
Please, be aware that a complete failure of the existing PLC would not result in any major
operation or non -compliant issues at the Louisburg POTW. If this were to happen the POTW
can be operated in a manual mode which would cost the Town more expense in electrical
consumption, but would not jeopardize effluent quality or POTW compliance.

At this time I would like to thank your office for the concern. If you have any further
questions, please feel free to contact me in my office at [phone].
Sincer ly,
GJ
Jim Ilington
Louisburg WRF ORC
Town of Louisburg
Cc: Mark Warren, Town Administrator
Louisburg WRF Files

I
Knies, Sara V
From:
Smith, Danny
Sent:
Friday, November 08, 2013 8:14 AM
To:
Knies, Sara V; Cashion, Ted
Subject:
Louisburg wwtp back generator
Jimmy Ellington called from Louisburg WWTP. He explained that they have a new generator, the generator is on line,
and they have all new control panels. The temporary generator is no longer on site. The new backup generator has
been on line since November 5th. Nice work!
Please make a note in file.
Danny
Danny Smith
Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
NCDENR-Division of Water Resources
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
[e-mail]
Email correspondence to and from this address moy be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.

Aug 20 13 02:21p Lo--'-burg Water Reclamati 9194962883 p.1
LOUISBURG WRF
FAX COVER SHEET
DATE:8-20-2013
TO:Mitch Hayes / NCDENR / 919-788-
7159
FROM:Jimmy Ellington / Louisburg
WWTP
PAGES (1NCLUDMGcovw:3
COMMENTS:
Mitch, a copy of the Louisburg WWTP
annual performance report for your
records. A copy has also been sent to
State Central Files. This will be
published in the Franklin Times for
public notice. If you have any questions
contact me at 919-496-2677. Thanks

Aug 20 13 02:21p La--4-turg Water Reclamati 9194962883 p.2
Louisburg Wastewater Treatment Plant
Performance Annual Report
July 1, 2012 —June 30, 2013
I. General Information
Facility Name: Louisburg Wastewater Treatment Plant
Responsible Entity: Town of Louisburg
Person in Charge/Contact: Jimmy Ellington, Plant Superintendent 919-496-2677
Applicable Permits:
NPDES Permit No. NCO020231 (Wastewater Discharge)
General Permit No. NC G110000 (Stormwater Discharge)
Non -Discharge Permit No. WQ0005981 (Biosolids Land Appliction)
Non -Discharge Permit No. WQ0019992 (Conjunctive Reclaimed Water System)
Treatment Process Description
The Louisburg W WTP is an extended aeration system with a permitted treatment
capacity of 1,370,000 gallons per day. It consists of influent screening and grit /grease
removal, an anaerobic mixing zone, two oxidation ditches, two secondary clarifiers, three
tertiary filters, ultraviolet disinfection, cascade aeration, two aerobic digesters and one
effluent reuse station (currently unused).
II. Performance
The Louisburg W WTP facility was compliant throughout the entire twelve month period
with no violations. The facility operated well within design efficiency with some
mechanical breakdowns, but all malfimctions were corrected as needed.
The table below shows plant performance in relationship with NPDES permit limits.
LOUISGURG WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EFFLUENT (DISCHARGE WATER) ANALYSIS
Parameter Summer Winter
NPDES Limits
Actual Values
Average
NPDES Limits
Actual Values
Average
H
6.0 to 9.0 s.u.
6.57-7.58 s.u.
6.0 to 9.0 s.u.
6.41-7.38 s.u.
CBODS 200 C
8.0 mg/L
2.1mg/l
16.0 mg/L
2.3mg/I
Ammonia
Nitrogen
3.0 mg/L
0.19mg/1
6.0 mg/L
0.22mg/1
Total
Suspended
Residue
30 mg/L
3.27mg/1
30 mg/L
5.48mg/I
Fecal Coliform
200/100 ml
21.81/100m1
200/100 ml
34.57/100ml
Dissolved
en
5.0 mg/L
minimum
7.79mg/1
5.0 mg/L
minimum
8.87mg/l

Aug 20 13 02:21p LoF,+-burg Water Reclamati 9194962883 p.3
Flow 1.37 MGD 10.6228MGD 1.37 MGD I0.6032MGD
III. Notification
This report will be published in the Franklin Times Newspaper.
IV. Certification
I certify under penalty of law that this report is complete and accurate to the best of my
know] ge. I further certify that this report has been made available to the users or
custoWers of the named system and that those users have been notified of its availability.
g-
J' Ellingto Date
Town of Louisburg

Town of Louisburg
A To C No. 020231 A02
Project No. CS370397-05
Issued November 8, 2011
Engineer's Certification
JUN 18 2013 .
I, kl Cyl I ✓ r 1 �2 Ua4, as a duly registered Professional Engineer in
the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically/weekly/full time)
the construction of the modifications and improvements to the Louisburg W WTP, located on NC
Hwy56 East in Franklin County for the Town of Louisburg, hereby state that, to the best of my
abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the following construction:
Replacement of three (3) existing aerators with three (3) new 250 gpm aspirators;
replacement of two (2) 500 gpm sludge recirculation pumps; and replacement of
three (3) 2.7 Hp anaerobic selector zone basin mixers, in conformity with the
project plans, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed and
approved by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
I certify that
substantial c
Signature / Vy1'(" t i
Date 7-6— 121
Mail this Certification to:
of the above referenced project was observed to be built within
tent of the approved plans and specifications.
Registration No. 0 � q po
Attn: Michelle McKay, E.I.
Construction Grants & Loans
DENR/DWQ
1633 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1633
�{tCARO /2",
44 9r:
S E.A =
GINS
•i���yq�l Si1t�iGaJ�\\\'

VGA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Acting Director Secretary
June 12,2013
Mr. Mark Warren, Town Administrator
Town of Louisburg
110 West Nash Street
Louisburg, North Carolina 27549
SUBJECT: Final Inspection
Water Reclamation Facility Improvements
SRF Project No. CS 370 397-05
flijrarlF1"-1i%
The Infrastructure Finance Section performed a Final inspection for the state and federally
funded portion of subject project on Wednesday June 12, 2013. Due to the nature of the project
being equipment intensive, IFS did not have the opportunity to perform any Interim inspections.
For the record however a Pre Construction meeting was conducted on May 10, 2012 after issuance
of approvals.
You should review this report; take actions or provide responses as indicated and then file with
your project records. You should maintain project records for 3 years from closeout of this loan. If
you have any questions please contact me at [phone] or via e-mail at
[e-mail]. It has been a pleasure working on this project with Mr. Jimmy Ellington
of your staff and your Engineer Michael Acquesta of Municipal Engineering Services.
Sincerely, i(. /
Getrild W. Horton, PE
Environmental Engineer
Construction Inspection Group
«n,g:,.h
cc: Jimmy Ellington, ORC, Town of Louisburg
Mike Acquesta, PE Municpal Engineerings Services, Boone office
Danny Smith, Raleigh DWQ
Mark Hubbard, PE, Donna Jackson, PE, Leslie Rogers
SRF
C.\Vae7',guhormn\Documents\Projects (Anvel\Luuisbury SRFS97-05 gv+h\Closeout\Lumsburg WRFImpiv FINAL I2-96-12 doc
Incastrvctum Finance Section One
IE33 Mail Service Center. Raleigh. North Camlina 279994633 NorthCarolina
Locaban: 8' floor Amhdale Building, 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh. North Carolina 27604 ,%Vli�llrlT!!f
Phone:[phone] \ FAX: [phone]
Internet: ifs.nc.gov
An foualOpoor2rety 1 A19MO&WActian SnnlMr

Louisburg WWTP Improvements
SRF Project No. CS 370 397-05
FINAr rnspectionof
Jun 2013
Pag. � 4 3
I. FINAL INSPECTION - Action Items and Comments - The NC Infrastructure Finance Section
(IFS) requests a response from either the Owner or Engineer, as applicable to those items
marked *. Item(s) may be addressed via a statement in a cover letter or by submitting the
requested information. It is recommended all information be submitted at one time to IFS. If
forms are needed to comply with items below, refer to IFS web site ifs.nc.gov
1) For the record the Record Drawings have been provided to Owner.
2) * Provide Warranty documentation to IFS noting all warranty date(s) for the contract.
Confirm that the information has been provided to all parties including Water & Waste
Systems Construction, Inc., that is, all parties should be aware of warranty date(s).
Documentation should also provide Substantial Completion Date.
3) * Provide IFS copy of Contractors Release of Liens.
4) * Provide IFS copy of Contractors Consent of Surety.
5) * Confirm that all spare parts specified have been turned over to Owner and provide list of
those spare parts.
6) * Submit final reimbursement request to IFS, please note that Owner is responsible for
seeking project related Sales Tax reimbursement through the NC Dept. of Revenue.
7) * Submit Owners Certification of Completion when appropriate.
8) * Submit Engineer's Certification of Completion.
9) * Submit DBE Form 6100-2.
10) Project was completed within the contract period.
H. SRF Funding Budget
Expense
Water & Waste Systems Construction Inc. contract
Direct Purchase Mixers
Direct Purchase Aspirators
Contingency
Legal
Planning, Design, Bidding
Construction Phase Engineering
Asset Management Plan
Total Eligible Costs
Louisburg has a maximum loan amount of $247,027
application. Term of loan is 20 years at 0% interest.
Eligible Amount
$
141,591
$
63,607.50
$
12,090
$
10,864
$
2,125
$
18,150
$
13,125
10,000
$
271,552.50
which is 10% above original
III. CONTRACT - Water & Waste Systems Constr., Inc., 14 Apothecary Court, Garner, NC 27529
Unlimited- PU (Water & Sewer Lines) PU (Water Pur. & Sewage Disp.) Lic # 35745
Consulting Engineer: Michael Acquesta, PE, Municipal Engineering Services Co., PA
671 West King Street, PO Box 349, Boone, NC 28607
IV. DESCRIPTION of ELIGIBLE WORK — The authorization to construct and the scope of
work consisted of constructing and/or installing:
o replace 3 - existing aerators with 3 new 250 gpm aspirators "Air Jammers"
o replace 2 - 500 gpm sludge recirculation pumps
0 425 lin. ft_ of ductile iron pipe in yard at sludge holding) and
o replace 3 - 2.7 Hp anaerobic selector zone basin mixers ....
all in conformity with the project plans, specifications, approved addenda and other supporting
data subsequently filed and approved by the Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources

Louisburg W W7P Imnmvements
SRF Project No. CS: 97-05
FINAL Inspection of
June 12, 2013
Page 3 of 3
V. CHANGE ORDERS - there was one change order for $ 6,858.50 for stone to improve the
access drive at rear of facility.
VI. FINAL INSPECTION PARTICIPANTS
Jimmy Ellington
Mike Acquesta, PE
Louisburg, ORC
[e-mail]
O'Brien & Gere
[e-mail]
919 418-3175[C]
919 971-5859[C]
Gerald Horton, PE NC Infrastructure Finance Section 919 707-9185
,[e-mail]

Apr 16 13 09:38a Louisburg Water Reclamati 9194962883 p.l
LOUISBURG WRF
FAX COVER SHEET
DATE: April 16, 2013
TO: Mitch Hayes / DWQ / Fax [phone]
FROM: Jimmy Ellington / Louisburg
PAGES (INCLUDING COVER): 9
COMMENTS:
Mitch, 2013 PPA including COC forms and copy of cover letter used for submission
to DWQ Central Files. This will be the last PPA for the NPDES permit #
NCO020231 cycle. Also enclosed, a copy of NCDWQ NPDES Effluent Pollutant
Scan Waiver Form signed November 30, 2011. Any questions please call 919496-
2677. Thanks

Rpr 16 13 09:38a Louisburg Water Reclamati 9194962883
976 4 1
110 W. Nash St.
Louisburg, N.C. 27549
[phone]
[phone] Fax
April 16, 2013
NC DENR
DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Central Files,
Li
ste 0l'*6&iA e
p.2
Please find enclosed, the Effluent Pollutant Analysis for the Town of Louisburg Water
Reclamation Facility for the year 2013. This will be the third and final Effluent Pollutant Analysis
for the current NPDES # NC0020231permit cycle. The NCDWQ NPDES Effluent Pollutant Scan
Waiver Form was signed and certified November 30, 2011. A copy of this waiver in enclosed. A
copy of all enclosed materials will be faxed to Mitch Hayes in the Regional Office. If you have
any questions please contact me at 919-496-3406.
JimlhyyEllington
Louisburg WRF
CC: Mitch Hayes, Regional Office

Apr 16 13 09:38a Louisburg Water Reclamati 9194962883 p.3
lieu of performing the required annual Effluent Pollutant Scan and to satisfy the NPDES reporting
requirement, a municipal wastewater treatment facility may complete and submit this form to NCDWQ if
the following criteria are met:
➢ The facility can still meet the requirement to perform three pollutant scans for its next NPDES
permit application; and
➢ Has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 MGD; or
➢ Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place); or
➢ Is otherwise required by the NCDWQ to conduct an annual effluent pollutant scan.
FacilityNamer
Louisburg Water Reclamation Facility
NPOESPernitNumber:
NCO020231
OutfallNumber;
001
EffectiVeDate.,
April 01,2010
(Compieteformforeach outfalidischarging effluent towaters of
the state and requiring an annual Effluent Pollutant Scan.)
Expiration Date:
September 30, 2014
Owner Information
Person Certifying the Form
Owner / Permittee Name: Town of Louisburg
Mark Warren
Certifer's Name: Jimmy Ellington
Title (if applicable): Town Administrator
Title or Position with facility: Plant Superintendant
Email Address: [e-mail]
Email Address: [e-mail]
Mailing Address: 110 West Nash Street
Louisburg, NC 27549
Mailing Address: 110 West Nash Street
Louisburg, NC 27549
City, State Zip:
City, State Zip:
Telephone: [phone]
Telephone: [phone]
By completing and submitting this form,1, Jimmy Ellington (printed name) certify
that the effluent waste stream for the facility and outtall indicated above has not significantly changed
within the past year in a manner that would cause any of the listed parameters to be present or present in
concentrations greater than previously reported and I hereby submit this completed form to satisfy the
NPDES annual Effluent Pollutant Scan reporting requirement for calendar year 2011
I also attest that the facility can still meet the req ement to perform three pollutant scans for the next
NPDES permit application.
Certified by (signature):
Position or titie of certifier: W WTP apeAntendant
Date certified: November 30, 2011
This completed form shall he submitted along with the Discharge Monitoring Report to the following address: Division
of iNoter Quality/Surface Water Protection Section /Centro] Files,1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina
27699-1617.

npr 16 13 09:38a Louisburg Water Reclamati 9194962683
p.4
Meritech, Inc..
Environmental Laboratory
Laboratory Certification No.165
Contact: Richard Collins
Client: Louisburg, Town of
110 West Nash St.
Louisburg NC 27549
Report Date:
NPDES#:
Date Sample Rcvd:
3/14/2013
NCO020231
2/26/2013
M eritech Work Order # 022613105 Sample:
Effluent Composite
2/25-26/13
Parameters
Result
Analysis Date
Renortine Limit
Method
Total Dissolved Solids
184 mg/L
2/27/13
10.0 mg/L
SM 2540C
Ammonia, Nitrogen
< 0.1 mg/L
3/6/13
0.1 mg/L
EPA 350.1
TKN
1.50 mg/L
3/5/13
0.20 mg/L
EPA 351.1
Nitrate/Nitrite, Nitrogen
5.91 mg/L
2/27/13
0.10 mg/L
EPA 353.2
Nitrogen, total
7.41 mg/L
3/5/13
0.20 mg/L
EPA 353.2
Antimony, total
< 0.025 mg/L
3/6/13
0.025 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Arsenic, total
<0.010 mg/L
3/6/13
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Beryllium, total
< 0.005 mg/L
3/6/13
0.005 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Cadmium, total
< 0.002 mg/L
3/6/13
0.002 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Chromium, total
< 0.005 mg/L
3/6/13
0.005 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Copper, total
0.007 mg/L
3/6/13
0.002 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Lead, total
< 0.010 mg/L
3/6/13
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Magnesium, total
2.90 mg/L
3/11/13
0.005 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Nickel, total
< 0.010 mg/L
3/6/13
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Phosphorus, total
0.0S5 mg/L
3/6/13
0.020 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Selenium,total
<0.010 mg/L
3/6/13
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Silver, total
< 0.005 mg/L
3/6/13
0.005 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Thallium, total
< 0.020 mg/L
3/6/13
0.020 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Zinc, total
0.070 mg/L
3/6/13
0.010 mg/L
EPA 200.7
Hardness (titration)
44 mg/L
2/28/13
1 mg/L
SM 2340C
E.PA625
Atwheci
3!'L1/13
625
Meritech Work Order#
022613106 Sample:
Effluent Grab
2/26/13
Parameters
Result
Analysis Date
Reporting.Lim
Method
Cyanide, total
< 0.005 mg/L
3/1/13
0.005 mg/L
EPA 335.4
Oil & Grease (HEM)
< 5 mg/L
2/28/13
5 mg/L
EPA 1664A
Phenols, total
0.013 mg/I.
2/28/13
0.010 mg/L
EPA 420.1
EPA 624
Attached
3/8/13
624
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data. u
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road, Reidsville, North Carolina 27320
tel.[phone] fax.[phone]

Rpr 16 13 09:39a Louisburg Water Reclamati 9194962883
MERITECH, INC.
Environmental Laboratories
Laboratory Certificate 4165
Client:
Louisburg
Meritech ID#:
022613105
Project:
PPA
Analysis:
03/21/13
Client Sample ID:
Effluent
Extraction:
03/04/13
Sample Collection:
02/26/13
Analyst:
MC
Dilution Factor:
1
EPA 625 SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS
Parameter
Result
Parameter
Result
Acenaphthene
<10 ug/L
Fluoranthene
<10 ug/L
Acenaphthylene
<10 ug/L
Fluorene
<10 ug/L
Anthracene
<10 ug/L
Hexachlorobenzene
<10 ug/L
Benzidine
<50 ug/L
Hexachlorobutadiene
<10 ug/L
Benzo(a)anthracene
<10 ug/L
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
<50 ug/L
Benzo(a)pyrene
<10 ug/L
Hexachloroethane
<10 ug/L
3,4-Benzofluoranthene
<10 ug/L
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
<10 ug/L
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
<10 ug/L
Isophorone
<10 ug/L
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
<10 ug/L
2-Methylnaphthalene
<10 ug/L
Benzyl butyl phthalate
<10 ug/L
Naphthalene
<10 ug/L
Bis(2chloroethoxy)methane
<10 ug/L
Nitrobenzene
<10 ug/L
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
<10 ug/L
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
<10 ug/L
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
<10 ug/L
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
<10 ug/L
Bis(2-ethythexyl)phthalate
< 10 ug/L
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
<10 ug/L
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
<10 ug/L
Phenanthrene
<10 ug/L
2-Chloronaphthatene
<10 ug/L
Pyrene
<10 ug/L
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
<10 ug/L
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
<10 ug/L
Chrysene
<10 ug/L
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
<10 ug/L
p-Chloro-m-cresol
<10 ug/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
<10 ug/L
2-Chlorophenol
<10 ug/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
QO ug/L
2,4-Dichlorophenol
<10 ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<10 ug/L
2,4-Dimethylphenol
<10 ug/L
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
<50 ug/L
2,4-Dinitrophenol
<50 ug/L
Diethyl phthalate
<10 ug/L
4,6-Dinitro-ocresol
<50 ug/L
Dimethyl phthalate
<10 ug/L
2-Nitrophenol
<10 ug/L
Di-n-butyl phthalate
<10 ug/L
4-Nitrophenol
<50 ug/L
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
<10 ug/L
Pentachlorophenol
<50 ug/L
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
<10 ug/L
Phenol
<10 ug/L
Di-n-octyl phthalate
<10 ug/L
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
<10 ug/L
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
<10 ug/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
/, t' 41Y
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Road * Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph * [phone] Fax
M

Apr 16 13 09:39a Louisburg Water Reclamati 9194962883 p.6
MERI M.0H. INC.
Environmental Laboratories
A'Division of Jvater Tecnnology and Controls, Inc.
Client:
Louisburg Meritech ID#:
022613106
Project:
PPA Analysis:
031O9/13
Client SamplelD:
Effluent Analyst:
VWV
Sample Collection:
02/26/13 Dilution Factor:
1
Report Date:
03/13/13
EPA 624 VOLATILE ORGANICS
Parameter
Result
Benzene
< 1.00 ug/L
Dichlorobromomethane
< 1.00 ug/L
Brom0form
< 1.00 ug/L
Methyl Bromide
< 5.00 ug/L
Carbon Tetrachloride
< 1.00 ug/L
Chlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
Chloroethane
<5.00 ug/L
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
<5.00 ug/L
Chloroform
< 1.00 ug/L
Methyl Chloride
< 5.00 ug1L
Chlorodibromomethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dibromoethane
< 1.00 ug/L
I,I-Dichloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichloroetliane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
< 1.00 ugfL
1,1-Dichloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,2-Dichloropropane
< 1.00 ug/L
cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene
< 1.00 ug/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene
< 1.00 ug/L
Ethyl benzene
< 1.00 ug/L
Methylene chloride
< 1.00 ug/L
1,1,2,2-Tetmchloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
Tetrachloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
Toluene
< 1.00 ug/L
1,1, I-Trichloroethane
< 1.00 ug/L
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
< I.00 ug/L
Trichloroethylene
< 1.00 ug/L
Trichlorofluoromethane
<5.00 ug/L
Vinyl chloride
< 5.00 ug/L
Additional Compounds
Acrolein
<50.0 ug/L
Acrylonitrilc
<10.0 ug/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
G ,
Laboratory Representative
642 Tameo Road' Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph' [phone] Fax

Chain of Custody Record
COC
Client: Louisburg
_//
Address: 19 WBST A)R,S S(',
_ ,�
Attention: �Ae'c� O //, I# a
NPOES#: p_ R
Phone:
Fax:
Email:
Project: PPA
Po#:
MERITECH INC.
Environmental Laboratories
- A Division of Water Technology and Control, Inc.
642 Tamco Rd Phone [phone]
Reidsville, NC Fax: [phone]
27320 Email: wtclabpbellsouth.net
Web Site: www.meritech-labs.com
Turn Around Time*
Std (10 ys)
3- 5 Day
0
24 -48 Hr
0
Sample
Location/ID #
Sampling Dates & Times
Person Taking Sample (Signature): µiv
Lab Use Only
START
END
Comp?
Grab?
#of
coma.
Tests Required
On
Ice?
pH OK?
C12 OK?
Date
Time
Date
Time
Effluent
Qa 5
D�3S
�2�/(3
D9 rs
C
3
TDS, 625
C
1
NH3, Ntot ( H2SO4)
C
1
Metals -Sb,As,ge,C[d,Cr,Cu,Rb,Ni,se,Ag-
'f!
TI,Zn, M ,Hardness,Ptot ( w/ HNO3
Effluent
db /�
Q�/S
G
2
C anide w/NaOH , Oil & Grease w/HC1
( )
'll
G
3
624 ( w/HCI )
G
1
Phenols (w/H2SO4 & CuSO4)
Method of Shipment:
Comments:
LLHg on Separate COC
❑ UPS
Fed Ex
Hand
Hand Delivery
�Otner
Will these results be used for regulatory purposes?
Yes No
*RUSH work must be approved prior to submitting samples.
Ralinquished by: J Dalo: Time:
4 • ��j •� J� �(P /j �1-'/S
Da
Received by: Date: Time:
;z t5 f3 1. y
Relinquished b Date: ' Time
/ 316 L1:
Received by: Date: Time:
_
Relinquished by: Date: Time:
Received at li by: Date: Time:
l n.
A
to
O
m
3
to
tt
to
m
A
to
to
ra
m
to
tD
a
�J

Hpr 16 13 09:39a Inuisburg Water Reclamati 919AQG2883 p.8
Client:
Attention
NPDES#
MERI TECH, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES
Laboratory Certification No. 165
Town of Louisburg W WTP
110 West Nash Street
Louisburg, NC 27549
Richard Collins
Date Sampled
02/26/13
Digested
02/27/13
Analysis
03/08/13
Anahst:
SMc
EPA 1631 Low Level Mercury Analysis
Meritech iD #
Sample 1D
Result
Reporting Limit
MBLK0407B
Method Blank
< 0.5 ng/L
0.5 ng/L
M02271315
Field Blank
< 1.0 ng/L
1.0 ng/L
M02271316
Effluent
5.10 ng/L
1.0 ug/L
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data.
d . X4l 1
Laboratory Representative
642 Tamco Rd - PO Box 27 - Reidsville, NC 27320
[phone] Ph - [phone] Fax
E-Mail: [e-mail]

6
�b
!(n S1 4&. A '4.
i tY/ kM11 C;H, INC. NPDESq
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES Client: owr, Luls%iut W WT
Tat:
A Division o/ Water Technology and Controls, Inc. -- —
1 ti
Address: �-.d It t-5 Fax:
- --� PH: 336-342-4748 75- P. O. ><
642 Tamoo Rd. FAX: [phone]
Reidsville, NC 27320 EMAIL: [e-mail] Attention: g c.�i Cx1' ci Go 11//1 5 proJectn
Chain of Custody Record (COC) EPA 1631 Person Taking Sample(Signature)r'"
Sampla Dale Time Bottle Tubing Samplers Sampling Site Descdrr
plion 245.1 Result In -House Cooker LocatloMD l: _ _ Lot q Lot a CWDH (ppt) Preservation
Field Blank
-/2611-
�2..36
.,,
14K
C/u "yr Gu/d. Ly �-�-
{1LGI_ �
Method of Shipment:
❑ UPS
Comments: Rcil N
Will these results be used for regulatory purposes? Yes No ❑
❑ Fed Ex
❑ Hand Delivery
* Other
Relinquished Date Time
..a a 6 /3 6� S
Received by Date
Relinquished by Date Time
Received by Date Time
Relinquished by Date Time
a ived at lab by Date Time
r
D
Im
E
N
Ct
ml
l
A
N
n
N
3
N
N
to
CD
41
(D
m
IV
m
m
w
0
.. ... ... .-.'" r3^^nf.rnr1 frnrn ! )h Cnnuro Arns

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Charles Wakild, PE
Governor Director
January 11, 2013
John Skvarla
Secretary
Mr. Mark Warren, Town Administrator JAN IS 413
Town of Louisburg J
110 West Nash Street
Louisburg, North Carolina 27549 NC DENR
Raletd Re Tonal Obit
SUBJECT: Change Order no. 1 - Final
Water & Waste Systems Construction Inc.
Louisburg WRF Improvements
Project No. CS 370 397-05
Dear Mr. Warren:
The Infrastructure Finance Section of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality has concluded
review of the information received in support of subject change order, for which the following
determinations have been made:
Change Order No. 1 Total Change
$
6,858.50
Eligible Part of change order
$
6,858.50
Original Contract & Eligible Amount
$
141,591.00*
New Total Contract & Eligible Amount
$
148,449.50
* Maximum Loan amount is $247,027
Change order #1 includes adding a plug valve for isolation and ABC stone on
deteriorated area of plant road near the current project. There was no request to add
time to the contract. Completion date remains September 1, 2012.
This Change order with related procurement documentation has been found to be in compliance
with applicable SRF regulations. However, it should be understood that this approval is
administrative only and does not relieve the recipient of the responsibility to ensure the validity of
the supporting documentation including the corresponding cost and pricing data.
S VFS\Pmjert Management ofench\Group-Conslmcbun I-srpCimn PrnjedsiAcfirei`,towSburg SR I-gwh\Cgs\C01-Final WSS 12-11-20don.
"structure finance Section
1633 Mail Serdce Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 21699-1633
location: 9`' Floor Archdale Building, 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 None �kihCarolina
Phone: [phone] \ FAX [phone] //
Internet :w .ncamteivualgvure awrally
An Equal Opportunity \ ANi,mati,e Action Employer

Louisburg Page 2 of 2
WRF Improven Change Order #1-Final
Water & Waste y,,ems Construction Inc. January 11, 2013
CS 370 397-05
Accordingly, this approval is without prejudice to a redetermination of allowable/unallowable
costs should a post approval review or audit disclose facts not now discernible.
Time extensions are approved for purposes of funding eligibility only. Any compliance schedules
contained in an SOC, JOC, permit, or other compliance or enforcement document issued by the
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, are not affected by this change
order determination.
This letter should be filed with the other SRF project documents in your possession. If you have
any questions or comments, please contact Gerald Horton at [phone], or me at
[phone].
Sincere ly,, �G64�iJ
Mark L. Hubbard, P.E., Assistant Chief
Infrastructure Finance Section
�Ak 11 uxh
Jimmy Ellington, ORC, Town of Louisburg
Municipal Engineering Services Co. PA
Danny Smith, Raleigh Regional Office
Mark Hubbard, PE,
Leslie Rogers
SRF