20240276 Ver 1__2024_02_15__Clarke_Creek_PCN_PJD_FINAL_20240215

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Clarke Creek Greenway Phase A
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑Institutional ❑Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
Clarke Creek Greenway Phase A is the initial phase of a proposed greenway project that spans approximately 1.5 miles along Clarke
Creek. The study area evaluated for the proposed greenway is an approximately 21-acre corridor comprised of undeveloped forestland
and a sanitary sewer easement.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: The City of Concord
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Taylor Kiker, PWS (Kimley-Horn)
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location — Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
The project corridor runs for 1.5-miles along Clarke Creek in Concord, Cabarrus County, North
Carolina. (Project Coordinates: 35.3945696,-80.7387917).
8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: Multiple - Linear Project
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Cabarrus
10. Project Location —Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Concord
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Clarke Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Yadkin Pee Dee (03040105)
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 13 and 14
Regional General Permit #
✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
::]Pre -Application Request
::]Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Kimley>>> Horn
February 15, 2024
Amber Lipsky
Wilmington District, Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Stephanie Gross
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request and Pre -Construction Notification
(NWP #13 & #14 and Individual 401 Water Quality Certification)
Clarke Creek Greenway Phase A
Concord, Cabarrus County, NC
Dear Regulatory Project Managers:
On behalf of our client, the City of Concord, Kimley-Horn (KH) is submitting the enclosed joint Section
404/401 Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) and Pre -construction Notification (PCN) for your
review for your review pursuant to Nationwide Permits #13 and #14 and Individual 401 Water Quality
Certification. Authorization is requested to construct a 10-foot-wide multi -use trail (greenway) along Clarke
Creek in Concord, Cabarrus County, North Carolina. The center of the project corridor is located at
35.3945696 °,-80.7387917°. The following information is included as part of this application submittal:
• Project Summary Sheet
• Pre -Construction Notification Form
• Agent Authorization
• Permit Figures
■ Figure 1 —Vicinity Map
■ Figure 2 — USGS 7.5' Topo (Kannapolis Quadrangle)
■ Figure 3 — Cabarrus Co. SSURGO Soils and NWI Map (2023 Nearmap Aerial)
■ Figure 4 — PJD Field Sketch (2023 Nearmap Aerial)
■ Figure 5 — PJD Field Sketch (LiDAR)
• Permit Drawings
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
• Agency Correspondence
PROJECT BACKGROUND
Clarke Creek Greenway Phase A is the initial phase of a proposed greenway project that spans
approximately 1.5 miles along Clarke Creek. The study area evaluated for the proposed greenway is an
approximately 21-acre corridor comprised of undeveloped forestland and a sanitary sewer easement. The
project corridor is bound by Cox Mill Elementary and undeveloped forestland to the east and single-family
residences to the north, west, and south.
AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Kimley-Horn consulted the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS service
on January 23, 2024. No documented architectural or historic sites of significance within the project corridor
were identified. A request letter was submitted to SHPO to determine the presence of architectural or historic
resources on January 23, 2024. At the time of this application, a response from NCSHPO has not been
received.

Kimley>>)Horn Paget
PROTECTED SPECIES
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on October 25, 2023, did
indicate known occurrences of threatened or endangered species occurring within one mile of the project
boundary. Kimley-Horn conducted pedestrian surveys for threatened and endangered species within the
project boundary on September 26 and 27, 2023. A concurrence request letter was submitted to the USFWS
on December 8, 2023. USFWS responded on December 29, 2023, and concurred with the MANLAA
biological conclusion. USFWS considered "consultation [under Section 7 of the ESA] to be complete and
require no further action at this time."
PROPOSED IMPACTS TO JURISDICTIONAL WATERS
The proposed project seeks authorization under NWP 13 for stream impacts associated with bank
stabilization.
• Impact 1: Stream 1
0 58 LF of permanent impacts to Stream 1 (Clarke Creek) associated with rip -rap bank
stabilization. Rip -rap will be pushed or "keyed" into the banks and will not be placed in
excess of the minimum needed for bank erosion protection.
• Impact 7: Stream 1
0 140 LF of permanent impacts to Stream 1 (Clarke Creek) associated with bank stabilization.
The banks will be graded back to a sustainable slope and planted with native riparian
vegetation to reduce bank erosion.
The proposed project seeks authorization under NWP 14 for wetland impacts associated with grading
activities necessary to construct the greenway. The proposed greenway will result in 7 single and complete
project impact sites that are separate and distant:
• Impact 1: Wetland 1a
0 0.002-acre of permanent wetland impacts to Wetland 1 a results from grading activities and
placement of rip -rap.
• Impact2: Wetland 1c
0 0.031-acre of permanent wetland impacts to Wetland 1c results from grading activities
necessary to construct a proposed bridge crossing.
• Impact 3: Wetland 1e
0 0.015-acre of permanent wetland impacts to Wetland 1e results from grading activities
necessary to construct the proposed greenway.
• Impact 4: Wetland 1g
0 0.001-acre of permanent wetland impacts to Wetland 1g results from grading activities
necessary to construct the proposed greenway.
• Impact 5: Wetland 1i
0 0.21-acre of temporary wetland impacts to Wetland 1i are necessary to perform the
construction activities. Wetland hydrology will be enhanced through the removal of the
topsoil. A native wetland seed mix will be applied immediately following construction.
• Impact6: Wetland 1k
0 0.07-acre of temporary wetland impacts to Wetland 1 k are necessary to perform the
construction activities Wetland hydrology will be enhanced through the removal of the
topsoil. A native riparian seed mix will be applied immediately following construction
Overall, impacts associated with the proposed greenway will result in 0.05-acre of permanent
impacts and 0.28-acre of temporary impacts to wetland waters of the US, and 198 LF of permanent
impacts to non -wetland waters of the US.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Avoidance and minimization efforts were implemented during development planning and design to the
greatest extent practicable to reduce the overall impacts on the aquatic environment while staying within
nationwide permit thresholds. The final plan demonstrates maximum avoidance and minimization efforts by

Kimley»>Horn
Pugs
reducing the proposed stream and wetland impacts. The rationale to support avoidance and minimization
efforts includes the following:
• The crossings of Stream 1 will utilize bridges instead of box culverts to avoid impacts to the stream
bed.
• Permanent impacts associated with the construction of the bridges will be completely avoided by
utilizing a timber -pile -supported boardwalk. The boardwalk structures will be installed by
implementing a top -down construction technique.
• Rip -rap associated with the bank stabilization at the crossing of Stream 1 will be pushed or "keyed"
into the banks and will not be placed below the ordinary high water mark.
• Temporary impacts have been minimized to the greatest extent practicable to meet the needs of the
project and do not pose adverse alterations to the existing wetlands. A native wetland seed mix will
be applied immediately following construction to establish a native wetland vegetative community
and provide initial stabilization.
• Avoidance of the remaining 3.76-acres of wetlands on -site.
• Avoidance of the remaining 1,367 LF of streams on -site.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
The proposed greenway does not exceed wetland and stream mitigation thresholds (0.05-ac of Wetland Impact
and 198 LF of Stream Impact); therefore, compensatory mitigation is not proposed.
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or if additional information is
necessary.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
,J,V, -- �k,
Taylor Kiker, PWS
Environmental Scientist

Kimley>>>Horn
Project Summary Sheet
Project Name: Clarke Creek Greenway Phase A
Applicant Name and Address: City of Concord
35 Cabarrus Ave. W
Concord, Cabarrus County,
NC 28025
Telephone Number: [phone]
Type of Request:
® Nationwide PCN (NWT # 13 & #14) ❑ Individual Permit Application
® Jurisdictional Determination
❑ Other:
Included Attachments:
® Project Plans
® USGS Map ® NRCS Soil Survey
® Agent Authorization
® Delineation Sketch ® Delineation Survey
® Data Forms (Up & Wet)
® NCDWR Stream Forms ❑ USACE Stream Forms
❑ NCEEP Confirmation
® Aerial Photo ® Site Photos
® Agency Correspondence
❑ Other: ❑ Other:
Check if applicable:
❑ CAMA County
❑ Trout County ❑ Isolated Waters
❑ Section 7, ESA
❑ Section 106, NHPA ❑ EFH
❑ Mitigation Proposed (❑ NC
EEP ❑ On -Site ❑ Off -Site ❑ Other)
County: Cabarrus
Nearest City/Town: Concord
Waterway: Clarke Creek
River Basin: Yadkin Pee Dee
H.U.C.: 03040105
USGS Quad Name: Kannapolis
Property Size (acres): 21
Approx. Size of Jurisdiction on Site (acres): 4.45
Site Coordinates (in decimal
degrees): 35.3945696 °N-80.7387917 °W
Project Location: The project corridor runs along Clarke Creek in Concord, Cabarrus County, North Carolina. The project
corridor is bound by Cox Mill Elementary and undeveloped forestland to the east and single-family residences to the north, west,
nnrd anuth
Site Description: Existing land use in the vicinity of the project includes single-family residential development, multiple schools,
and undeveloped forested land.
Impact Summary (if applicable):_ The proposed project seeks authorization under NWP 13 and 14 for stream and wetland
impacts associated with the construction of approximately 1.5 miles of egr enway adjacent to Clarke Creek. Impacts to aquatic
resources are proposed to be conducted in separate and distant impact sites within the project corridor. The proposed project will
result in 0.05-acre of permanent impacts and 0.28-acre of temporary impacts to wetlands, and 198 LF of permanent impacts to
streams.
NWP
#
Open Water
(acres)
Wetland
(acres)
Stream Channel
Intermittent and/or Unimportant
Aquatic Function
Perennial and/or Important
Aquatic Function
Temp.
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
Temp.
Perm.
Tem .
Perm.
If
ac
if
ac
if
ac
if
Ac
13
198
14
0.28
0.05
Total
0.28
0.05
198
Total Permanent (Loss) Impact to Wetland WoUS
0.05-acre
Total Permanent (Loss) Impact to Non -Wetland WoUS
198 LF
Kimley-Horn Contact: Taylor Kiker, PWS Direct Number: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

x STATE
" n
u C
se vuannt°1
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
Water Resources
Office Use Only
Corps Action I D no. [Click to enter.]
DWR project no. Click enter.]
Site Coordinates:
Date received: [Click to enter.]
Date received: [Click to enter.]
Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): 35.3945696'
Longitude (DD.DDDDDD): 81.1058746'
Form Version 4.3, 1210412023
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
(Ver. 4.2, 1210412023)
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits and corresponding Water Quality Certifications
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk are required. The form is not considered complete until all
mandatory questions are answered.
The PCN help document may be found at this link:
https://edocs.deq. nc.qov/WaterResources/DocView.aspx?dbid =0&id=2196924&cr=1
Page 1 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

A. Processing Information
County (counties) where project is located: *
Cabarrus Additional (if needed).
Is this an ARPA project? *
❑ Yes 0 No
If yes, ARPA project number:
* The project number can be found on the "Letter of Intent to Fund"
(LOIF) or "Offer and Acceptance Letter". If you are unable to locate
Click or tap here to enter text.
your DWI ARPA Funding Project Number, please contact Corey
Basinger at [e-mail] for further assistance.
Is this a NCDMS project? *
(Click yes only if NCDMS is the applicant or co-
❑ Yes 0 No
applicant)
Is this a public transportation project?
(Publicly funded municipal, state, or federal road, rail,
0 Yes ❑ No
or airport project)
Is this a NCDOT project? *
❑ Yes 0 No
If yes, NCDOT TIP or state project number:
Click to enter.
If yes, NCDOT WBS number: *
Click to enter.
0 Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams, waters,
Clean Water Act)
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: *
❑ Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal
waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted? *
❑ Yes 0 No
Please provide the date of the previous submission. *
Click to enter a date.
0 Nationwide Permit (NWP)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek
*
El Regional General Permit (RGP)
authorization?
❑ Standard (IP)
This form may be used to initiate the standard/ individual permit
process with the USACE. Please contact your Corps
representative concerning submittals for standard permits. All required items can be included as attachments and
submitted with this form.
1 C. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? *
® Yes ❑ No
NWP number(s) (list all numbers ):
13 and 14
RGP number(s) (list all numbers ):
Click to enter
Are you a federal applicant?
❑ Yes 0 No
If yes, please provide a statement concerning compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Act
Click to enter text.
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from DWR (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification— Express
❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
0 Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
Is this a courtesy copy notification
❑ Yes 0 No
Page 2 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? *
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: *
❑ Yes
❑x No
For the record only for Corps Permit: *
❑ Yes
❑x No
1f.
Is this an after -the -fact permit/certification application? *
❑ Yes
❑x No
1g.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts?
p Yes
❑x No
If yes, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program.
1 h.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? *
❑ Yes
❑x No
1 i.
Is the project located within an NC DCM Area of Environmental
Concern (AEC)? *
❑ Yes
❑x No ❑ Unknown
1j.
Is the project located in a designated trout watershed? *
❑ Yes
❑x No
If yes, you must attach a copy of the approval letter from the appropriate Wildlife Resource Commission Office.
Trout information may be found at this link: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Requlatory-Permit-
Program/Agency-Coordination/Trout.aspx
Page 3 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

B. Applicant Information
1 a.
Who is the primary contact?
Taylor Kiker
1 b.
Primary Contact Email:
[e-mail]
1 c.
Primary Contact Phone: (###)###-####
980-296-0810
1 d.
Who is applying for the permit/certification? (check
all that apply)
❑ Owner 0 Applicant (other than owner)
1 e.
Is there an agent/consultant for this project?
® Yes ❑ No
2.
Landowner Information
2a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Multiple — Linear Project
2b.
Deed Book and Page No.:
click to ent�
2c.
Contact Person (for corporations):
Click to enter.
2d.
Address
Street Address:
Click to ente.
Address line 2:
Click to enter.
City:
Concord
State/ Province/ Region:
North Carolina
Postal/ Zip Code:
28025
Country:
USA
2e.
Telephone Number: (###)###-####
Click to enter.
2f.
Fax Number: (###)###-####
Click to enter.
2g.
Email Address:
Click to enter.
3.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a.
Name:
George Berger
3b.
Business Name (if applicable):
The City of Concord
3c.
Address:
Street Address:
35 Cabarrus Ave. W
Address line 2:
City:
Concord
State/ Province/ Region:
North Carolina
Postal/ Zip Code:
28025
Country
USA
3d.
Telephone Number: (###)###-####
[phone]
3e
Fax Number: (###)###-####
Click to enf,
3f.
Email Address:
[e-mail]
Page 4 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

4.
Agent/ Consultant (if applicable)
4a.
Name:
Taylor Kiker
4b.
Business Name:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
4c.
Address:
Street Address:
200 South Tryon Street
Address line 2:
Sutie 200
City:
Charlotte
State/ Province/ Region:
North Carolina
Postal/ Zip Code:
28202
Country:
USA
4d.
Telephone Number: (###)###-####
[phone]
4e
Fax Number: (###)###-####
Click to entt
4f.
Email Address:
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter:
Attach a completed/signed agent authorization form or letter. A sample form may be found at this link:
https://www.saw. usace.army. mil/Missions/Reg ulatory-Permit-Program/Permits/2017-Nationwide-Permits/Pre-
construction-Notification/
Page 5 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1 a. Name of project: *
Clarke Creek Greenway Phase A
1 b. Subdivision name (if appropriate):
Click to enter.
1 c. Nearest municipality/town: *
Concord
2.
Project Identification
2a.
Property identification number (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Multiple — Linear Project
2b.
Property size (in acres):
21
2c.
Project Address:
Street Address:
N/A
Address line 2:
N/A
City:
Concord
State/ Province/ Region:
NC
Postal/ Zip Code:
28027
Country:
USA
2d.
Site coordinates in decimal degrees (using 4-6 digits
after the decimal point): *
Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): * 35.3945696°
Longitude (-DD.DDDDDD): *-80.7387917°
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Clarke Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving
C
water: *
The Surface Water Classification map may be found at this link:
htti)s://ncdenr.mai)s.arcgis.com/apes/webappviewer/index.html?id=6el 25ad7628f494694e259c80dd64265
Yadkin-PeeDee
3c. In what river basin(s) is your project located?
Choose additional (if needed)
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is
030401050101
located:
The Find Your HUC map may be found at this link:
htti)s://ncdenr.maps.arcqis.com/apes/Publiclnformation/index.html?appid=ad3a85aOc6d644aOb97cdO69db238ac3
Page 6 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of
this application:
Clarke Creek Greenway Phase A is the initial phase of a proposed greenway project that spans approximately
1.5 miles along Clarke Creek. The study area evaluated for the proposed greenway is an approximately 21-
acrecorridor comprised of undeveloped forestland and a sanitary sewer easement. The project corridor is bound
by Cox Mill Elementary and undeveloped forestland to the east and single-family residences to the north, west,
and south.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this
❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
If yes, please give the DWR Certification number and/or Corps
[Click to enter.]
Action ID (ex. SAW-0000-00000):
jClick to enter.]
Attach any pertinent project history documentation
4b2. Is any portion of the work already complete?
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, describe the completed work.
UJUK W efltel it.
4c. List of other certifications or approvals/denials received from other federal, state or local agencies for work
described in this application not related to the 404 or 401.
Click to enter te)
4d. Attach an 8'h x 11" excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of
the project site.
4e. Attach an 8'h x 11" excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map
depicting the project site.
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the
3.81
property:
acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent
1,695 linear feet
and perennial) on the property:
4g1. List the total estimated acreage of all existing open waters on the
N/A acres
property:
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide public access to a recreational greenway along Clarke Creek in
Cabarrus County, North Carolina.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project seeks to construct approximately 1.5 miles of greenway along Clarke Creek in Cabarrus
County, North Carolina. General construction equipment includes, but is not limited to, bulldozers, excavators,
front-end loaders, etc. will be used for construction purposes.
4j. Attach project drawings/site diagrams/depictions of impact areas for the proposed project.
4k. Will this activity involve dredging in wetlands or waters?
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, describe the type of dredging, the composition of the dredged material, and the locations of disposal area.
Click to enter text
Page 7 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

5.
Jurisdictional Determinations
5a.
Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on
the property or in
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
proposed impact areas?
Comments:
The wetlands and streams within the project corridor were delineated by Kimley-Horn staff on July 20th and 24th,
and September 7th, 26th, and 27th, 2023.
5b.
If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination,
❑ Preliminary ❑ Approved ❑ Emailed concurrence
what type of determination was made? *
❑ Not Verified ❑ Unknown ❑x n/a
Corps AID number (ex. SAW-0000-00000):
Click to enter.
Name (if known): Taylor Kiker, Doug Fox
5c.
If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional
Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn and Associates,
areas?
Inc.
Other: Click to enter.
5d.
List the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determination or State determination if a determination was made by
either agency.
Click to enter.
5d1.
Attach jurisdictional determinations.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
Clarke Creek Greenway Phase A is the initial phase of a proposed greenway project that will span approximately
5-miles adjacent to Clarke Creek in Cabarrus County, North Carolina.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permit(s) used, or intended to be used, to
authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? This includes other separate and distant crossings
for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -construction
notification.
The timeline for the completion of the latter phases of this project have not been finalized. It is possible that
future authorization from the USACE will be required in order to complete the project.
7. Addresses of adjoining property owners, lessees, etc. whose property adjoins the waterbody (if more than can be
entered here, please attach a supplemental list)
Click to enter.
8. Scheduling of activity:
Click to enter.
Page 8 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Where are the impacts associated with your project
(check all that apply):
❑x Wetlands
❑ Buffers
❑ Pond Construction
❑x Streams - tributaries
❑ Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, complete this table for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2a1.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
2g.
Site #*
Impact
Impact
Wetland Type*
Wetland Name*
Forested
Jurisdiction
Impact Area
Reason/Type*
Duration*
?*
Type*
(ac)*
Impact 1
Grading
Permanent
Bottomland
Wetland 1a
Yes
Both
0.002
Hardwood
Wetland
Forest
1a
Impact 2
Grading
Permanent
Bottomland
Wetland 1 c
Yes
Both
0.031
Hardwood
Wetland
Forest
1c
Impact
Grading
Permanent
Bottomland
Wetland 1e
Yes
Both
0.015
Hardwood
Wetland
Forest
1e
Impact
Grading
Permanent
Bottomland
Wetland 1g
Yes
Both
0.001
Hardwood
Wetland
Forest
1g
Impact 5
Mechanized
Temporary
Bottomland
Wetland 1 i
Yes
Both
0.21
Clearing
Hardwood
Wetland
Forest
1i
Impact 6
Mechanized
Temporary
Bottomland
Wetland 1 k
Yes
Both
0.07
Clearing
Hardwood
Wetland
Forest
1k
W7
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W8
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W9
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose onE
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W10
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W11
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W12
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W13
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W14
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
W15
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Y/N
Choose one
Click to enter
Page 9 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

2g1.
Total temporary wetland impacts
0.28 ac
2g2.
Total permanent wetland impacts
0.05 ac
2g3.
Total wetland impacts
0.33 ac
2h.
Type(s) of material being discharged and the amount of each type in cubic yards:
Click to enter text
2i.
Comments:
The proposed project seeks authorization under NWP 14 for wetland impacts associated with grading activities
necessary to construct the greenway. The proposed greenway will result in 7 single and complete project impact
sites that are separate and distant:
• Impact 1: Wetland 1 a
o 0.002-acre of permanent wetland impacts to Wetland 1a results from grading activities and placement of rip -rap.
• Impact 2: Wetland 1 c
o 0.031-acre of permanent wetland impacts to Wetland 1c results from grading activities necessary to construct a
proposed bridge crossing.
• Impact 3: Wetland 1 e
o 0.015-acre of permanent wetland impacts to Wetland 1e results from grading activities necessary to construct
the proposed greenway.
• Impact 4: Wetland 1g
o 0.001-acre of permanent wetland impacts to Wetland 1g results from grading activities necessary to construct
the proposed greenway.
• Impact 5: Wetland 1 i
o 0.21-acre of temporary wetland impacts to Wetland 1 i are necessary to perform the construction activities.
Wetland hydrology will be enhanced through the removal of the topsoil. A native wetland seed mix will be applied
immediately following construction.
• Impact 6: Wetland 1 k
o 0.07-acre of temporary wetland impacts to Wetland 1 k are necessary to perform the construction activities
Wetland hydrology will be enhanced through the removal of the topsoil. A native riparian seed mix will be applied
immediately following construction
Page 10 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream/ tributary impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site,
complete this table for all stream/ tributary sites impacted.
** All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government
Site #
3a
Impact
Reason
3b.
Impact
Duration
3c.
Impact Type
3d.
Stream Name*
3e.
Stream
Type
3f.
Jurisdiction
Type
3g.
Stream Width
(avg ft)
3h.
Impact length
(linear ft)
S1
Impact 1 —
Stream 1
Permanent
Bank
Stabilization
Stream 1
Perennial
Both
30
58
S2
Impact 7 —
Stream 1
Permanent
Bank
Stabilization
Stream 1
Perennial
Both
30
140
S3
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S4
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S5
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S6
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S7
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S8
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S9
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S1O
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S11
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S12
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S13
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S14
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S15
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S16
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S17
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S18
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S19
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S2O
Click to enter
Temp/ Perm
Choose one
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
3i1. Total jurisdictional ditch
impact:
Click to enter. linear ft
3i2. Total permanent stream
impacts:
198 linear ft
M. Total temporary stream
impacts:
Click to enter. linear ft
3i4. Total stream and ditch
impacts:
Click to enter. linear ft
Page 11 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

3j. Comments:
The proposed project seeks authorization under NWP 13 for stream impacts associated with bank stabilization.
• Impact 1: Stream 1
o 58 LF of permanent impacts to Stream 1 (Clarke Creek) associated with rip -rap bank stabilization. Riprap
will be pushed or "keyed" into the banks and will not be placed in excess of the minimum needed for bank
erosion protection.
• Impact 7: Stream 1
o 140 LF of permanent impacts to Stream 1 (Clarke Creek) associated with bank stabilization. The banks
will be graded back to a sustainable slope and planted with native riparian vegetation to reduce bank erosion.
Page 12 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

4.
Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other
open water of the U.S., individually list all open water impacts in the table below.
4a.
Site #*
4a1.
Impact Reason
4b.
Impact
Duration*
4c.
Waterbody Name*
4d.
Activity Type*
4e.
Waterbody
Type*
4f.
Impact area
(ac)*
01
Click to enter.
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Choose one
. hoose one
Click to enter.
02
Click to enter.
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Choose one
choose one
Click to enter.
03
Click to enter.
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
04
Click to enter.
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
05
Click to enter.
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
4g.
Total temporary open water impacts
Click to enter. ac
4g.
Total permanent open water impacts
Click to enter. ac
4g.
Total open water impacts
Click to enter ac
4h.
Comments:
Click to enter.
5.
Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction is proposed, complete the table below. (*This
does NOT include
offline stormwater
management ponds.)
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Pond ID
Proposed use or
Wetland Impacts
(ac)
Stream
Impacts (ft)
Upland
#
purpose of pond
Impacts (ac)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
entF
P2
Choose one
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
ente
P3
Choose one
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
ente~
5f.
Total
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click LU
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter
5g.
Comments:
Click to enter.
5h.
Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, permit ID no.:
Click to enter.
5i.
Expected pond surface area (acres):
Click to enter.
5j.
Size of pond watershed (acres):
Click to enter.
5k.
Method of construction:
Click to enter.
Page 13 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

6. Buffer Impacts (DWR requirement)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. Individually list all buffer impacts.
6a. Project is in which protected basin(s)?
(Check all that apply.)
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba
❑ Jordan ❑ Goose Creek ❑ Randleman
❑ Other: .,;K to ern.
Site #*
6b.
Impact Type*
6c.
Impact Duration*
6d.
Stream Name*
6e.
Buffer
Mitigation
Required?*
6f.
Zone 1 Impact*
(sq ft)
6g.
Zone 2 Impact*
(sq ft)
131
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter
B2
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter
B3
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter
B4
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter
B5
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B6
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
B7
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
B8
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
B9
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
B10
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
1311
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B12
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B13
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B14
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
B15
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
B16
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
B17
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
B18
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
B19
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
B20
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
6h. Total temporary impacts:
Zone 1: Click to enter sq ft
Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6h. Total permanent impacts:
Zone 1: Click to enter sq ft
Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6h. Total combined buffer impacts:
Zone 1: Click to enter sq ft
Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6i. Comments:
UICK to enter.
Please attach supporting documentation (impact maps, plan sheets, etc.) for the proposed project.
Page 14 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through project design:
Avoidance and minimization efforts were implemented during development planning and design to the greatest
extent practicable to reduce the overall impacts on the aquatic environment while staying within nationwide
permit thresholds. The final plan demonstrates maximum avoidance and minimization efforts by reducing the
proposed stream and wetland impacts. The rationale to support avoidance and minimization efforts includes the
following:
• The crossings of Stream 1 will utilize bridges instead of box culverts to avoid impacts to the stream bed.
• Permanent impacts associated with the construction of the bridges will be completely avoided by utilizing
a timber -pile -supported boardwalk. The boardwalk structures will be installed by implementing a top -down
construction technique.
• Rip -rap associated with the bank stabilization at the crossing of Stream 1 will be pushed or "keyed" into
the banks and will not be placed in excess of the minimum needed for bank erosion protection.
• Temporary impacts have been minimized to the greatest extent practicable to meet the needs of the
project and do not pose adverse alterations to the existing wetlands. A native wetland seed mix will be applied
immediately following construction to establish a native wetland vegetative community and provide initial
stabilization.
• Avoidance of the remaining 3.76-acres of wetlands on -site.
• Avoidance of the remaining 1,367 LF of streams on -site.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Special care and consideration will be implemented, to the greatest extent practicable, in areas immediately
adjacent to the creek in order to prevent incidental fallback. Temporary erosion control measures, including but
not limited to skimmer basins and silt fence, will be implemented to minimize sediment laden runoff from exiting
the site.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S., Waters of the State, or Riparian Buffers
2a. If compensatory mitigation is required, by whom is it required? ❑ DWR ❑ Corps
(check all that apply)
2b. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this ❑ Mitigation Bank
project? (check all that apply) ❑ In Lieu Fee Program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if using a Mitigation Bank
(Must satisfy NC General Statute143-214.11 (d1).)
3a. Name of mitigation bank:
Click to ente
3b. Credits purchased/requested:
Type: Choose one
Quantity Click to enter.
Type: Choose one
Quantity Click to enter.
Type: Choose one
Quantity Click to enter.
Attach receipt and/or approval letter.
Page 15 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

3c. Comments:
Click to enter.
4.
Complete if Using an In Lieu Fee Program
4a.
Attach approval letter from in lieu fee program.
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
Click to enter linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
Choose one
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington
District's RIBITS website: (Please use the filter and select Wilmington district)
https://ribits.usace.army.miI/ribits apex/f?p=107:27:2734709611497::NO:RP:P27 BUTTON KEY:O
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
Click to enter. square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
Click to enter. acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
Click to enter. acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
Click to enter. acres
4h.
Comments:
Mick to enter.
5. Complete if Providing a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If proposing a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan,
including mitigation credits generated.
Click to enter.
5b. Attach mitigation plan/documentation.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — DWR requirement
6a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer
❑ Yes ❑ No
that requires buffer mitigation?
If yes, please complete this entire section — please contact DWR for more information.
6b.
If yes, identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires
mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required in the table below.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
Choose one
Click to enter.
Zone 2
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
Choose one
Click to enter.
6f. Total buffer mitigation required
Click to enter.
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or
❑Yes El No
NC Division of Mitigation Services proposed?
6h.
If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services.
6i.
Comments:
LACK to enter.
Page 16 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

Page 17 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (DWR requirement)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers
❑ Yes ❑x No
identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of stormwater treatment. If the
project is subject to a state implemented riparian buffer protection program, include a plan that fully documents
how diffuse/dispersed flow will be maintained.
All Stormwater Control Measures (SCM) must be designed in accordance with the NC Stormwater Design
Manual (https://deg.nc.,qov/about/divisions/energv-mineral-land-resources/energv-mineral-land-permit-
guidance/stormwater-bmp-manual).
Associated supplement forms and other documentation must be provided.
❑ Level Spreader
What Type of SCM are you
❑ Vegetated Conveyance (lower seasonal high water table- SHWT)
providing?
❑ Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
(Check all that apply)
❑ Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
❑ Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the
buffer
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here.
Attach diffuse flow documentation.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
Is this an NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's
Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
❑ Yes ❑x No
2b.
Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as
defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
❑x Yes El No
To look up low density requirements, click here:
http://reports.oah.state. nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-%20environmental%20guaIity/chapter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20man age ment/subchapter%20h/15a%20ncac%2002h%20.1003.pdf
2c.
Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP)
❑ Yes ❑ No
reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -
approved local government stormwater program?
❑ n/a — project disturbs < 1 acre
Note: Projects that have vested rights, exemptions, or grandfathering from state or locally implemented
stormwater programs or projects that satisfy state or locally -implemented stormwater programs through use of
community in -lieu programs should answer "no" to this question.
2d.
Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply?
❑ Local Government
(Check all that apply.)
❑ State
If you have local government approval, please include the SMP on their overall impact map.
❑ Phase II ❑ USMP
Local Government Stormwater Programs
❑ NSW ❑ Water Supply
Page 18 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Click to enter.
State Stormwater Programs ❑ Phase II ❑ HQW or ORW
❑ Coastal Counties ❑ Other
Comments:
Linear public transportation projects are required to treat stormwater runoff to the Maximum Extent Practicable in
accordance with the practices described in the NCDOT Best Management Practices (BMP) Manual. Diffuse flow
will be implemented to provide proper drainage and water treatment.
Page 19 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local)
® Yes ❑ No
funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require
preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental
®Yes El No
Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been
finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the
❑ Yes ❑x No
NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)
Comments:
The Categorical Exclusion has not been finalized by the state clearing house. A copy of the final approval letter
can be provided upon request.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A
NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300),
Federally Non -Jurisdictional Wetlands /Classified Surface Waters
❑ Yes ❑x No
(15A NCAC 2H. 1400) DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. If you answered "yes" to the above question, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
Click to enter.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future
impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby
❑ Yes ❑x No
downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "no", provide a short narrative description:
Future phases of this project are not anticipated to have negative effects on downstream water quality.
Greenway projects typically do not result in additional development.
3c. If yes, provide a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWR
policy. (Attach .pdf)
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑x N/A
Page 20 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

4b. If yes, describe in detail the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a treatment plant, list the capacity
available at that plant.
Click to enter.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected
® Yes ❑ No
species or habitat? (IPAC weblink: https://www.fws.gov/ipac/ ffws.govl)
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species
® Yes ❑ No
Act impacts? *
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another federal agency involved? *
❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown
If yes, which federal agency?
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Divisions 1-8? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the
U.S.? *
®Yes El No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
5g1. If yes, have you inspected the bridge for signs of bat use such as
staining, guano, bats, etc.? Representative photos of signs of bat use
❑ Yes ❑ No
can be found in the NLEB SLOPES, Appendix F, pages 3-7.
Representative photos of signs of bat use can be found in the NLEB SLOPES, Appendix F, pages 3-7. Link to
NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf
If you answered yes to 5g1, did you discover any signs of bat use? *
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
If yes, please show the location of the bridge on the permit drawings/ project plans
5h. Does this project involve the construction/ installation of a wind
turbine(s)? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, please show the location of the wind turbine(s) on the permit drawings/ project plans (attach .pdf)
5i. Does this project involve blasting and /or other percussive activities
that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers,
❑ Yes ❑x No
mechanized pile drivers, etc.? *
If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this
activity on the property (attach .pdf)
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated
Critical Habitat? *
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on October 25, 2023, did indicate known
occurrences of threatened or endangered species occurring within one mile of the project boundary. Kimley-Horn
conducted pedestrian surveys for threatened and endangered species within the project boundary on September 26
and 27, 2023. A concurrence request letter was submitted to the USFWS on December 8, 2023. USFWS responded
on December 29, 2023, and concurred with the MANLAA biological conclusion. USFWS considered "consultation
[under Section 7 of the ESA] to be complete and require no further action at this time."
Page 21 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

Attach consultation documentation.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as
an Essential Fish Habitat?
❑ Yes ❑x No
Is there submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) around
the project vicinity?
El Yes ElNo ❑x Unknown
Will this project affect submerged aquatic vegetation?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑x Unknown
Explain: Click to entc
6b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NCNHP element occurrence database did not indicate the presence of EFH within the project boundary
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data):
http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural
preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or
❑ Yes ❑x No
properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological
resources?
Kimley-Horn consulted the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS service on
January 23, 2024. No documented architectural or historic sites of significance within the project corridor were
identified. A request letter was submitted to SHPO to determine the presence of architectural or historic
resources on January 23, 2024. At the time of this application, a response from NCSHPO has not been received.
7c. Attach historic or prehistoric documentation.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how the project meets FEMA requirements.
The proposed project will meet FEMA requirements through a Floodplain Development Permit and No -Impact
Certification. The implementation of a hydraulically equivalent compensatory storage area in the southern portion of the
project corridor results in no increase in the 100-year base flood elevation.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FIRM Panel 4670, 4680
Page 22 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

H. Miscellaneous
Comments:
Click to enter.
Attach pertinent documentation or attachments not previously requested
I. Signature *
❑x By checking the box and signing below, I, as the project proponent, certify to the following:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete, to
the best of my knowledge and belief;
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time;
• The project proponent hereby agrees that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter
66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• The project proponent hereby agrees to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66,
Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• The project proponent hereby understands that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be
enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• As the project proponent, I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN/online form.
Full Name: * Taylor Kiker
Signature: * U�
Date: * 02/14/24
Page 23 of 23 PCN Form Version 4.3- December 4, 2023

AGENT AUTHORIZATION

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name: Lloyd Wm. Payne, Jr
Address: 35 Cabarrus Ave W., Concord, NC 28025
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Project Name/Description: Clarke Creek Greenway
Date: February 14th, 2024
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attention: Amber Li
Re: Wetland Related Consulting and Permitting
Lloyd Wm. Payne, Jr. hereby designates and authorizes Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc. to act in my/our behalf as my/our agent solely for the purpose of
processing Jurisdictional Determinations, Section 404 permits/Section 401 Water
Quality Certifications applications and to furnish upon request supplemental
informa-tion in support of applications, etc. from this day forward until successful
completion of the permitting process or revocation by the owner.
In addition, I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of
the property/properties identified herein, do authorize representatives of the
Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the
property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal
jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1899.
Authorized this the 14th day of
Lloyd Wm. Payne, Jr., ICMA-CM
Authorized Representative
(Print Name)
February 2024
Authorized Representative
(Signature)

FIGURES

N
Rd —�__ ` A nde tes�;u vie n
sotto, �paVi-dSOa-►iw
y Ired'lll
Qa Da_viclsO�t,_1j Catawba ailsbury
Northstone o�`r d�d z I Go�HY-pC IT50 ROW
Country Club Gr ss� c Nloo dsville
o
a� yo \ '
F
Lincoln
untz Ra y� Concord
Cabarrus
y� p
a \ Gey !T!
NuntersvilleC°ne \ \ \ 4 Ch7IIn((e Stanly
Grey AZ' Rd Mecklenburg
carke /o y
ro
/ /2 /�-P-opla�re
Skybrook Golf
Club �p �Qp Union
/ Tlpht,/
olbro°�e� \did a lRd �L
I R
\ 14eddin9tOn Rd
Legend
j \ \ 5 Project Boundary
/ \ Concord -Padgett
\ Regional Airport
j / \
v
Q) Rd.,� Highland Creek \ g a
Q\d' Golf Club \ co+
05 I ¢
Val Y /� )l \ 11/1 S ��
II \ 'S
\ h°
/ d \ °/ Qom.
Ridge R
Joplor
\ Rd ek R \ lodl° Gte) \ Rocky River
o Oeat�' Golf Club at !y
a\. \ =\\\ ncord
e
Mallard Creek \
Park
\ /
m
CD
0 2 000 4 000 8 The Tradition . \ i , , ,000
Golf Club \ Feet
CroftSt�nYCree/r / 1 IN = 4,000 FT
V 29
Notes
Figure 1: Vicinity Map Basemapsource:
eHornClarke Creek Greenway Phase A ESRI World Street Map
Kim >> Concord, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
January 2024

— s •'' � A x der vie N
ICA 4� lAn
IredII
Catawba i; Row
105 �:
���� �,! ■■ 'S i� r Mop swill,
J
Lincolh
�� ' !�'L • r �. 1 Concord
Cabarrus
harlotte Stanly
Union
Legend
LTI
Project Boundary
1
r' �f
! ` •
0 600 1,200 2,400
3
l.
s ` L 1 IN = 1,200 FT Feet
-
Figure 2: USGS Topographic (Kannapolis) Map Baoetmeap source:
■ Clarke Creek Greenway Phase A USGS USATopographic Map
imley))Horn Concord, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
January 2024

-.h' .�" ai �' . s•.. ♦ . • - �� .',c:, „c- -
a RS
e nder
�`' • �. ,':: � :°.�.' ,: 3:: 7 :: � � vie
-:3. sate vfll
tok
0
a ;,5z !i � S ' a i i;..' - � 'T f � � � � -as' "'�'Y �VN
's ,.
-_ -
4.
Iredell
_( n s -
�r Catawba Rowan
lo
s. •' : _'•, y .� •1.� O �/�00 c Ills
rr.Lincoln
Cancord
�� L ".1
i '{� .r ;ra• *Y �* ;r'rA" • '*..# w " -� . Cabarrus
WWI
M. ., �',• C - :r :. �•''� 1h, ...,.5� 1' as
A
,F• - T l
i ice, ,. h arf Otte Sta n ly
r
4
r
MO.
�';�-� .rw •'s• • raj,] k•� •6'' 4 � '��-#'.4;L. 1. ",elm.�.� r�•' �.NA
'� [ n� - ��}}%y . �° ;�.. ax.,u•'
..
� � •,�. "�. .S .
1 ° 1 �h.,w M1 •°i. yr � -, JV.. P�:�:: %S R��� .�: ck�..ati' -� ��. 'L • � _ ! }.� �r .. �V
t o Fr re rs.A = Union
�n
6 • o►sc
�■ ,.7;LT>r �.r. �1 r_- P`.''".�`i ...ice;' y
• ' ri $` it @ 'N 7
Ilk
.(`. Legend
r h
�1
�....
��,,"��;�, - `- ;,� �;� • ��y�'.; �:;'. 'H ��•., ��� .... ��' '� Project Boundary
Y
y. �s �^-�
\1 1,
-� � ;gip, �� •• ,��•, NWI Mapped Wetlands
_
i
• .f'S n. .. .. .. _ + _SSURGOSoils
a• � i p'.Y-.s ✓yt
�' . •..-.11 '. • . •' ... � �J ��^C V ].A M^•• S s `,�"'.��ki;. e ,.. .... P:.. �'.`s.r #.e[ -�4i v.i . � is
H dric Rating
f ► y .„.. ryp`.
ilk
.� •� H dric 1 32 /o
.5 .y
F
iY y;y +
,
.. r.+e r
r:x
'eK t.
�' � ►.% ,, ,,, � �^-�� � Not H dric 0/0
• , ��.'•:.
7 ` ,T .iF:�'t -!'v. ai f. �i y ;^.•• •• '� � ti �- .�3�^;"�� 4'-'' � .,'R. _ '•�.��' "��'� s<� ,1 v. � �h � � 1
+.� _ � ' �. Y I a — F. ,R'- i1. •.1 �i :34
a ID� �.d t' - .►. r "�' :� a' �."t.�
Y
c,.
f'�' ` p�;y �'y,�•a C' �•,� .e, - ' ..�' „C .gyp °'-•-n.. �} •�°. '`
WISDOM
-.. _ G �►. - ..ram Ys° �"' .. '?_4-_. ... .'':' i
Summary by Map nni[—Cabarrus County, Nor[N earolinz (N[OlSJ � .w � •.:h:\'1 �' '��'��; ,. �,. . p�!.y �''
Summary by Map Unit — Cabarrus County, North Carolina (NCO25)
aa[in acres in nox percenr of nor i 4 "' wap unir rymbal map uni[name g �` [t [� .. - -_':." %:'� �� `pf,' y!.-j •f�
CcB2 Cecil sand la loam, 2 to 8 t ,lo es, moderate) ded 0 0.5 2.3% ' '• "
Y c Y Percen P Y ero I. � _ �Y,r, '9. � ..r ..'• % - �s
CcD2 Cecil sand la loam, 8 to 15 t slo deratel ded 0 0.3 1.3%! r , y c y percen pes, mo y ero }" ,. � :�. 4, � . •r^ � •
ChA Ch.w la sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded 5 5.9 28.6% '�" • v 'e _ ■
C.B Coronaca clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes 0 2.2 10.8% - �y� x i' ��, .,, � • .,.. _ _ \ i , - - '.y► 0 225 450 900
COD Coronaca clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes 0 '1n 1 _ ',�
i µads w, Feet
CUB2 Cullen clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded 0 0.0 0.1% N t7' yyyy,, + n ' ' ��'r • :t°• , � 1 3
Ent) Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes 0 5.7 27.4 % , .�• [, _ y'- ,' I ' • L' • 1 IN_
450 FT
Totals for Area of Interest 20J 100.0% • ` wr
{...
!
Figure 3: SSURGO Soils and NWI Map o otesCe:
■ Clarke Creek Greenwa Phase A USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey
Kim >> Horn y - Cabarrus County
Concord, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Basemap source:
2023 Nearmap Aerial Imagery
January 2024

OF
e nder N
vie
�4 in WK os�. , P, " .
M11 .. -, . .. ..- n
r q7lo 07,
S1�1 0 L7F)
atesvrll
Stream 1 a (118 LF) f Stream
-A
S A.
0 Iredell
I isbuty
4� I Top
Catawi)ba Rowan
k poll co c
Stream -I C (W I L It-
4-
Wetland 1 a (0.60-ac) <0* ,. i
WRI, Lincoln
4, Li
Can cord
-o 't,
10
Cabarrus
V.
Wetland 1 b (0.01 -ac)
7
tone( as
kf . . .. ...... . A—. h arlottart s' Sta n ly
e rg
1A
'0
'
W- cK2a
0
-X
N
I VA
A
V in
Union
k:.
Stream 2 (105 LF
HO
Stream le (6( 0
lee
on,
k . . .. -; . t 1�� Legend
:01
Stream
A
r
Project Boundary
Stream 3 (104 LF) 0- 00
A
W Potential Wetland WOTUS
Streams (Potential Non -wetland
Wetland 1f VVU I US)
0 Ml 4 TV
IAI 4-1 A 4 1 n 4 A
-r-b Perennial
W Stream 1 i (2
c.
.,V
Wetland le (0.30-ac)
.. 's
.T y� -
w
R iK, } ,�'�v Stream 1 102 LF
;�'.:.-..I
Stream
A —
Stream 1k (112
01
I T"14 'At..
'p
Wetland , Aii.�
4.. Air
ac)
0
Wetland 1k (0.60-
0 Wetland 1h (1.01-
"A
1W T
N,
;7 W 0 275 550 1,100
7
71 - Wetland 1i (0.06-ac)
�40
1 IN 550 FT
Wetland 1' (0.25-ac Feet
Figure 4: PJD Field Sketch Ballotessemap source:
Clarke Creek Greenway Phase A 2023 Nearmap Aerial Imagery
Kimley >>Horn Cabarrus County, North Carolina
January 2024

e nder N vie
{ n
• e Stream 1a (118 LF) Stream 1b (110 LF) Statesviii
-
Iredell
`',ilisbuty
�7 = Catawba Rowan
Stream 1c (97 LF)
Wetland 1a (0.60-ac) Q��s+ Lincoln
J� A. Cancord
Stream 1d (185 LF) I. Cabarrus
o , rtr11
•Wetland 1b (0.01-ac) (�
torsi
17 Gaso +
h arf ptte Sta n ly
Q' ck e rg
Wetland 1c (0.52-ac) �� Q
V
Union
Stream 2 (105 LF) r
y _ Hill
Stream 1e (60 LF) ,; - � � R.
�
Le end
Stream 1f (119 LF)] j
_PON, Project Boundary
~ Stream 3 (104 LF)
+ Stream 1g (97 LF) t Potential Wetland WOTUS
Streams (Potential Non -wetland
\\ Wetland 1f (0.02-a( WOTUS)
1 Wetland 1d (0.14-ac)
• � -� g � .; � • �+ Perennial
• Stream 1i (20 LF) r• ,. �_•
Elevation (ft)
821.436
• • • ' .� - - _ Wetland 1e (0.30-ac)
- Y �_- ' Stream 1j (102 LF) _� _ 347.828
Stream 1 h (247 LF) ;
-�.
1 ; 7 t r
�..4 Stream 1 k (112 LF) �.
4
Wetland 1g (0.31-ac)Co
, -
f J �..-
0
MLL
i
p _ Wetland 1 k (0.60-ac)
- Wetland 1h (1.01-ac) -
;�.
_ Stream 11 (179 LF)
g
Wetland 1 i (0.06-ac) 0
® 0 275 550 1,100
Wetland 1j (0.25-ac) Feet
1 IN = 550 FT
Figure 5: PJD Field Sketch (LiDAR) o otesCe:
eHornClarke Creek Greenway Phase A NOAAQL2 LiDAR
Kim >> Cabarrus County, North Carolina
January 2024

PERMIT DRAWINGS

E-
11
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLANS
CLARKE CREEK GREENWAY - PHASE A
WINDING WALK NEIGHBORHOOD TO JIM RAMSEUR PARK
CITY OF CONCORD
CONCORD, NC
TYPE OF WORK:
ASPHALT GREENWAY, GRADING, STORM DRAINAGE, EROSION CONTROL, BOARDWALKS, PREFABRICATED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES
ENGINEER:
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
200 S TRYON, SUITE 200
CHALOTTE, NC 28202
PHONE: [phone]
CONTACT: TORI GOLASZEWSKI, P.E.
OWNER
CITY OF CONCORD PARKS AND RECREATION
147 ACADEMY AVENUE NW
PO BOX 308
CONCORD, NC 28026
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
CONTACT: GEORGE BERGER
SURVEYOR
CONCORD ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, INC. (CESI)
P.O. BOX 268
CONCORD, NC 28026
(704) 791 - 5248
CONTACT: DAVID HAYWOOD
Sheet List Table
Sheet Title
Sheet Number
COVER SHEET
C-1.0
GENERAL NOTES
C-1.1
LEGEND
C-1.2
TYPICAL SECTIONS
C-2.0
KEY SHEET
C-4.0
PLAN & PROFILE
C-4.1 TO C-4.9
PLAN & PROFILE — CONNECTIONS
C-4.1 TO C-4.16
DETAILS
C-7.0
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
C-9.1 TOC-9.4
EROSION CONTROL PLANS
C-9.5 TO C-9.12
CROSS SECTIONS
C-11.0 TO C-11.21
VICINITY MAP
NTS Plan View .....
PROJECT LENGTH = 1.49 MILES Horz. Profile ..
Vert. Profile ...
O C T O B E R 2023 Cross Section
GRAPHIC SCALES
20
40
60
20
40
60
4
8
12
10
20
30
H
W
2
Of
Lu
O
U
zl
Y 0
�¢oO
U�wQoz
wO
s1LuwLL
0
J � �
U vo
0
0
z
0
SHEET NUMBER
C-1.0

!_CNICDAI NI/ITCC
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO MAINTAIN ACCESS TO BUSINESSES AND PRIVATE
PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES.
GRADING AND SURFACING
THE GRADE LINES SHOWN DENOTE THE FINISHED ELEVATION OF THE PROPOSED
SURFACING AT GRADE POINTS SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL SECTIONS. GRADE LINES MAY BE
ADJUSTED AT THEIR BEGINNING AND ENDING AND AT STRUCTURES AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER
IN ORDER TO SECURE A PROPER TIE-IN.
CLEARING
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
TOLERANCE:
STRUCTURES INCLUDING STORM DRAIN PIPE, STORM STRUCTURES, SEWER PIPE, AND RETAINING
WALLS SHALL HAVE A TOLERANCE OF 30.10 FEET. STRUCTURES INCLUDING RISERS, WEIRS,
AND ORIFICES, SHALL HAVE A TOLERANCE OF t0.05 FEET.
CIME: CI n0E:C-
LIMITS OF PROPOSED SLOPES ARE INDICATED IN THE PLANS, DETAILS AND STANDARD
DRAWINGS. THE MAXIMUM SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED A 3:1 (HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL)
UNLESS DESIGNATED BY THE ENGINEER. A CUT SLOPE OF 2:1 MAXIMUM WILL BE USED ONLY
AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
C CAI(`CC
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND RESET FENCES AS NOTED ON THE PLANS AND/OR AS
DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND WATER LINE:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE CARE WHEN WORKING AROUND SANITARY SEWERS AND WATER
LINES. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR DAMAGE EXISTING SEWER OR WATER LINES, HE SHALL
IMMEDIATELY REPLACE THE LINE AT HIS EXPENSE WITH DUCTILE IRON PIPE. THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL REPLACE SANITARY SEWER AND/OR WATER LINE, WITH A MINIMUM TEN FOOT SECTION
OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE WHEN DRAINAGE PIPE COMES WITHIN TWO FEET OF SAID LINES,
VERTICALLY OR HORIZONTALLY.
F11Rj-rar>t��r
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE A MEETING WITH THE CITY ARBORIST, BEFORE GRADING,
TO DETERMINE THE VIABILITY OF RETAINING TREES THAT ARE PROPOSED TO BE PROTECTED.
CONTACT CONCORD URBAN FORESTRY AT 704-920-5393, [e-mail]
11
NCDOT 2024 STANDARD DRAWINGS
THE FOLLOWING ROADWAY STANDARDS AS SHOWN IN "ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS"
HIGHWAY DESIGN BRANCH - N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - RALEIGH, N.C., DATED
JANUARY 2024 ARE APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT AND BY REFERENCE HEREBY ARE
CONSIDERED A PART OF THESE PLANS:
STD. NO. TITLE
DIVISION 2- EARTHWORK
200.02 Method of Clearing- Method II
225.02 Guide for Grading Subgrade - Secondary and Local
DIVISION 3- PIPE CULVERTS
300.01 Method of Pipe Installation
DIVISION 8- INCIDENTALS
876.02 Guide for Rip Rap at Pipe Outlets
838.11 Brick End�all for Single and Double Pipe Culverts
840.04 Concrete Open Throat Catch Basin
840.54 Manhole Frame and Cover
DIVISION 16- EROSION CONTROL AND ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT
1605.01 Temporary Silt Fence
1606.01 Special Sediment Control Fence
1607.01 Gravel Construction Entrance
1632.02 Rock Inlet Sediment Trap (Type B)
1632.03 Rock Inlet Sediment Trap (Type C)
UTILITY OWNERS
CITY OF CONCORD SEWER DEPT
CITY OF CONCORD
WATER RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 308
CONCORD, NC 28026
PHONE: [phone]
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
2560 DERITA RD,
CONCORD, NC 28027
PHONE: [phone]
WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY OF CABARRUS COUNTY (WSACC)
O_
z
232 DAVIDSON HIGHWAY
CONCORD, NC 28027
PHONE: [phone]
L _
O Q
o
o
_
^\ o z o
a
o
F
W
w
0
Z
qJ
W
Z
W
CD
zl
Y 0
of C)
U � UL
wwQO
YWw�
O�a0
J
U vo
0
0
Z
0
SHEET NUMBER U
C-1.1

E-
2
SURVEY/EXISTING FEATURES LEGEND
MULTI -USE PATH FEATURES LEGEND
j
TREE
PROPOSED CUT LINE
WATER VALVE
r
PROPOSED FILL LINE
0
o
WATER METER
PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT
Os
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
0
PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT
OO
SANITARY SEWER CLEAN -OUT
®
PROPOSED BOARDWALK
z
DROP INLET
®
PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
8
CURB INLET
cR
PROPOSED CURB RAMP
L
tt
LIGHT POLE
PROPOSED FENCE
O w
O
ELECTRIC MANHOLE
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL
= o M o
sr
ELECTRIC POLE
PROPOSED STORMWATER PIPE
�^
GUY WIRE
® ❑
PROPOSED STORMWATER CATCH BASIN
o o Y
^'
WATER HYDRANT
PROPOSED STORMWATER TRENCH DRAIN
a
O
COMMUNICATIONS MANHOLE
OO
PROPOSED STORMWATER MANHOLE
"' N
STREET SIGN
e
PROPOSED HYDRANT
�a
------------
GAS VALVE
PROPOSED WATER VALVE
W
V EXISTING WETLAND
PROPOSED WATER LINE
CIDzo
-J PAVED ROAD
u
PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN LIGHT
F
CURB
PROPOSED BOLLARD LIGHT
o
� zz
PAVED PARKING
PROPOSED WAYFIN DING SIGN
UNPAVED PARKING
—LOD— — —
PROPOSED LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
o
N
00
1
I
EXISTING PROPERTY LINE
EASEMENT LEGEND
aN
w aN
Q
o�
Ex -Row
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
10
a
ss ss
SANITARY SEWER LINE
-------
PERMANENT EASEMENT
—wwW—
WATER LINE
-T°E— — — -
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
sT
STORMWATER LINE
GAS LINE
F0
UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATIONS LINE
w
IE IE
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE
(D
wJ
of
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE
FENCING
FEMA FLOODWAY
FEMA 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN
U
z
TREE LINE
O
PROPERTYCORNER
Y 0
SURVEY CONTROL POINT
w
Q 0
n/
LL Q
U�oz
wwQO
YWw�
��a0
J � �
U v�
0
0
z
0
SHEET NUMBER
C-1.2

r
a
oEXISTING
GROUND
1
2.0• 10.0• 2.0• 2.0• 10.0' 2.0• 0
INSET 1
EXISTING / EXI ST NG EXISTING I EXISTING
GROUND GROUND GROUND GROUND
Os PGL o s ��\ r%'L1-STA. 136+50 TO STA. 137+35 C:�C\�i, %T` Os PGL os
z.o� z.oA -L1- STA 139+89 TO STA. 140+77 2o.A z.o%
EXISTING EXISTING
3, � EXISTING 3, GROUND GROUND Z GRGROUND3'�
GROUNNDD 3'
GROUND
��/��i SEE INSET i
1 1
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2
r 10' WIDE ASPHALT GREENWAY 10' WIDE CONCRETE GREENWAY L
NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE a
O
0
ALIGNMENT BEGIN STATION END STATION a o �I
- _
Q W a
■\�/ o
i
E
� O
� 0 F
O
SEE STRUCTURE PLANS 10'MINCLEAR 10'MINCLEAR
SHEET ST-01-sT-1� �•�• 5.�5.
0
SEE STRUCTURE PLANS o w O
r
SHEET sT-oi- sT-ii a °N' Q �
o o m
yo �
cn o
z
r7
O
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3 TYPICAL SECTION NO. 4 W
10' WIDE PREFABRICATED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE (n
10' WIDE CONCRETE BOARDWALK
NOT TO SCALE J
E NOT TO SCALE
_U
z
Y o
W
PAVEMENT SCHEDULE Q O O
L)�LLz
z��
NOTES W W Q U
2. SLOPE GREENWAY AND 1. SEE PLANS FOR NG CROSS SHOULLDERSLPERSPLANS. W d
3. Cl AND J1 EDGE SLOPES TO BE 1:1 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. A/ O
4. STATIONS SHOWN UNDER TYPICAL SECTIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE
Q I.J�
NEAREST STATION NUMBER. SEE PLANS SHEETS FOR EXACT STATION
LOCATION. J _
U v�
o
cL
E
SHEET NUMBER
C-2.0
1 6" CONCRETE (FIBER
LL
o
-Y4- 4011+96 4013+47
ALIGNMENT
BEGIN STATION
END STATION
-L1-
100+29
121+76
ALIGNMENT
BEGIN STATION
END STATION
-L1-
121+86
123+06
-Y1-
1001+10
1001+46
-Y1-
1002+46
1007+12
-Y4-
4001+17
4006+30
-Y4-
4007+30
4007+70
-Y4-
4008+70
4011+96
ER REINFORCED)
C 1
2" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE (S9.SC) AT AN
AVERAGE RATE OF 224 LBS. PER S0. YD.
J1
6" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
T
3" TOPSOIL
1
GEOGRID
1
PRECAST GRAVITY RETAINING WA
ALIGNMENT
BEGIN STATION
END STATION
-Y1-
1001+46
1002+46
-Y4-
4006+30
4007+30
-Y4-
4007+70
4008+70

E
NORTH a
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
i�0 125 250 500
C-4.110 -Yq-
� � A
\ O z
o�
\ - \Vo
1 2� z�
-Y2 \ /o.
\ C/I z
U o
V A �4
� o
C, oo
w o y
aN o�
1 � I
&-4.7
\ \ r ur
H R
O
�,o` COX MILL
Y3- a mw�
HIGH SCHOOL
rn mrtm� ,
W
Lu
U)
W
Y
/ -Y4-
W �
C-4.14 _ C .1 COX MILL — L J Q O
_ - - ELEMENTARY o Z
I
E \
I ` l
1 � I
/ 1 I
U Z op
w
YWaLL
LLjw
a 0
00-0
J_
U vu
O
U
Z
/ OU
SHEET NUMBER
C-4.0

-A \
° N-TA � ____' SS
/41
Y //
1 i�dr /
F , /
= �E61[fyGRE N AY� J
S SHEET�L-4.10
I1 -__ 14HSS
/ /
' f flIM EL& 615.25'
INV4N(A): 606.01'
/ I /DIN IN(B): 599.09'
MV OUI(C): 598.87'
-
SS
o
\
Q
^�\ Tv\O�
1\ T� �Q .�O b`
O 1 TA
\ \
\
-'STA:100
F
BEOIfI N
TA:10�9
l
\
_ /ALLEI�MILLS\T
A
/ DIVE OWNERS \ I
AS OCIATI�N, INC gEGIN� PRO T
" PIN: t670-07 119 A STA1 0.0 A
DB: 1t 287 PG: 239
- / MB: �4 PG: 39\
NORTH N 93.3
EASTIN�y 8 7.09
v
/
I
v Fzn
11
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
CHORD
DELTA
TANGENT
C100
50.00'
30.04'
S15'41'40"E
29.59'
34'25'09"
15.49'
21
50.00'
20.13'
S13'02'53"W
19.99'
23'03'57"
10.20'
2
50.00'
19.14'
S13'36'47"W
19.03'
21'5609'
9.69'
C103
25.00'
7.13'
S10'48'45"W
7.10'
16'2005"
3.59'
C104
25.00'
12.04'
S5-11'13"W
11.92'
2735'09"
6.14'
C105
50.00'
17. 41'
S18'35'02"E
17.33'
19-57'21"
8.80'
RIPRAP APRON SEE
DETAIL 3 SHEET C-7.0
ISTA: 103+11.33, -31.00 LTA
46 LF OF
15'RCP
@ 5.72 h
- - - - - - -- -
BACKWATER FOR
CLARKE CREEK
RIM `ELEV: 15.68' 12" CMf� f-
��fifi INV. 815. y
670
- - - - - /7�
1\Z �PROPO, GREENWA-Y-(=L1) _ - - - 91-
131
F T�6
-0I103.i6'
O\
F
F
F F
\ �
F
-G7
/
L-
/S RI /T`OE='NAY
GA
MAR%
/ )
0401
NCD
I
-------_�--_--_-�-__
-------
1 c/IT/
\� ///
STA:
RIM:
-
NV :
/ -- - - - - - -
.-`.
3 20=
4a �� /I
�I ,625- -
- - -
sT TIONip- v\
vI RP NLS--- -- -
DRAIN
/ /
n r
i �18" TR/ T i
EE
I
I \\
/ /
J / ( 5 REBAR
\ I /
3Y3
5EBAR R
OAK/
-4x
K
0
z
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
77
_- - - - - - - -
MHSS
---TBM ELE'"62t-89%
INV IN: 598.99' _ _ -
C13 _ -- - INV �.
STD. 840.04 €
REMQV EXISTING PIPE _ / /
_ _ - / _- _---- ---_IPEE / /
3+11.27, 15.00 RT _----- 625 - �SI8'58'48"w
7.170
.07 -- _ - - - - - -
_ -21" OAK ----- -i --
22" OAK - - - - -
-- 7-
J „TRP'NLS - -
C154
�` BIARBED W RE_x CE �-x-x x-x x • "• x
21" OAK �
I 5 REBAR
20.5" OAK J
ANUJA RATHIKRINDA &
SIVANARAYANA RAO KASTALA,
C�j5.1g
WIFE AND HUSBAND
H GATES, JR.
BASAVARAJ PATIL &
PIN: 4680-06-0014
Id EYULU KAKARLA
& ALICIA S. OATES,
PRATHID PATIL,
DB: 10640 PG: 142
SOWJANYA KA A
HUSBAND AND WIFE
HUSBAND AND WIFE
A
MB: 50 PG: 55
5
U B WIFE \
PIN: 4680-06-0126
PIN: 4680-06-0110
. 4670-96-9293
DB: 10610 PG: 136
DB: 10547 PG: 224
DB: 10610 PG: 150
MB: 50 PG: 55
I MB: 50 PG: 55
MB: 50 PG: 55
5 REBAR
HIGH POINT ELEV. 61942
HIGH POINT STA. 191+93 28
PVI STA199+81.18
PVI ELEV.619 49
AD.S.nc
K.9.67
PVI STA.195+89.98
PVI ELEV.618
AD evc
K.55 39
03
59.99' VC
59 09' VC
625
625
F PROPOSED
620
620
- - -
- - - -
--
------
--
/
T
615
/
\
/
/
o
om
coo
�
615
BEGIN
CONSTRUCTION -
1-
zj
z
wm
m
z >
STA:100+29
ELEV:616
34
95
z
�j
PROP. 15" RCP
w
y
m
-
w
X
�w
~
m
Qw
610
610
co
mS
co
e�
100+00
101+00
102+00
103+00
-L1- PROFILE
Hor. Scale:i "=20' I Vert. Scale :1 "=2'
104+00
105+00
106+00
W
J_
IZ
NO�/
fL/�L
L.L
W
Z
Q
J
z
Y 0
O¢oO
U�oz
W W QO
se w LULL
Of � a 0
J
V vo
D
0
z
0
SHEET NUMBER
C-4.1

MHSS /
RIM ELEV.-617.20' /
IN IN: 598.36'
'ALLEN MILLS HOMEOWNERS INV OUT: 598.28' /
ASSOCIATION, INC
PIN: 4680-05-6643
DB: 13656 PG: 323 J BACKWATER FOR PROPOSED 10'GREENWAY(-L1 J / / - _
R FOR
ME : 81 PG: 9 A CLARKE CREEK -BA ATE
REEK
r - -
\ _- - — - - - � A
- =
��--
I� RIM E-LEY 81S4: - _ --
IN V IPL39872
INV OUT- 598E0'
72.00' TIE ----
11
0
O
Z
HIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
-- \_ — \ 22.5' TREE --
�, - '---------WOODED- \ \
-__-�,-� _ DRAIN
BP: 01 _ XISTING WETLAND
TIE` �t� �� _FLOOD-L,1NE
-�- F���� 0 OSEU O11CPETE SWALE BRIDG`EU—
�—
_ —n_ —
EAll 2SHEET_C-7.0
— _r__ _ t___ \\\�620 _-���___ �F-s5_�19F~� __
c_- �_____� �-� ���1 �vII YSEWER_, W 3,8_64 T� —F r
�, F RIGI17 -tt_E_ - ITi
19= rREE v w ���
62-L1-SSTAV0+31.25=
- - - - - _ x/­rk BAR-Y2-STA2000+463'h I
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
CHORD
DELTA
TANGENT
C106
50.00'
17.52'
S18'31'26"E
17.43'
20-04'35"
8.85'
C107
500DOO'
122.12'
S1'29'18"E
121.82'
13'59'40"
61.37'
C108
500.00,
111.81'
S11'54'54"W
111.58'
12'48'46"
56.14,
/ _-
i -625— /
--
- - —
----x�x�
x +� >x-max
---—'�� WO
_
OgE
—WOODED���
-�
GAD\-
1
_ A �-
SPIKE
+/+
G WALK OWNERS ASSOCIA�
NORTH CAROLINA NON-PROFIT C
C/0 HAWTHORNE MANAGEMENT
INC., A
ATION
PANY
x- -�-
TRP NLS
+
PIN: 4670-95-1236
\
�\
Q
F, /+/
DB: 8440 PG: 294
SARAH F SMITH UNMARRIED AND
1 x \
MB: 50 PG: 55
& 5 REBAR
MONUMENT
�
NA083(20111NC GRID
N=
N= 605,887.28'
/ \
E= 1,480,136.26'
LOCAL CROUNO
ANEL S. COH &
N= 605,887.21'
NDSEY M. CAR K,
E- 1, 8
AND AND WI
PIN: 70-95-9961
14 PG: 116 \
/DB:
MB: 50 5
BARBARA J. FLEETON, UNMARRIED
PIN: 4680-05-0676
DB: 5947 PG: 233
MB: 44 PG: 45
_-F- \ _
15" FE} '\� 615-
\F --- R w ^
` \1F
l J
\ \ / R BAR
PROPOSED 10' CONNECTION (--Y2) \ \ \ \ y
SEESHEETC-4 3
7DRAI (-� y� /
1 � �
PROPOSED CONCRETE SWALE BRIDGE \\ \A ASPHALT
QI l
SEE DETAIL 2 SHEET C-7.0 ELEa .A23.19'
_ 4
CATCH BASIN
IT�
aiM FI EV: 622.69'
62b 62b
LOW POI NT ELEV. 615 38 HIGH POINT ELEV. 618.63 LOW POI NT ELEV. 615 04
LOW POINT STA. 108,4593 HIGH POINT STA. 109,06 95 LOW POINT STA. 111+32 95
PVI STA.107+5885 PVI STA. 108+64.61 PVI STA. 109+87.83 PVI STA.111 2.17
PVI ELEV.615 75 PVI ELEA 615 28 PVI ELEV.619 02 PVI ELEA 614 98
ADO 76. AD 7% AD.629% AD.356%
K65 43 K 14 39 K.7.95 K 14 06
5090VC 50.00' VC 50.00' VC 50.00' VC
620 620
EXISTING GRADE
615 0.30% 615
PROPOSED GRAD
610 610
605 t605
106+00 107+00 108+00 109+00 110+00 111+00 112+00
-L1- PROFILE
Hor. Scale:i"=20' I Vert. Scale:1"=2'
z
Y 0
�¢oO
U�oz
wwQO
YWw�
�00-0a0
J � �
U vo
D
0
z
0
SHEET NUMBER
C-4.2

\3 J T ALLEN MILLS HOMEOWNERS
t'0 EEC CC �Tq ASSOCIATION, INC
ESN SE�V. R/W Tj PIN: 4680-05-6643
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET kpp,S MB: 4iP�r: 109 F DB: 13656 PG: 323
0 ff # 63 5\\P`'�G: 205 MB: 81 PG: 06
�R: ACC
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
CHORD
DELTA
TANGENT
C109
175.00'
183.34'
S11'41'30"E
175.07'
60'01'35"
101.09'
C110
50.00'
31.78'
S59'54'40"E
31.24'
36'24'44"
16.45'
C111
50.00'
14.47'
S86'24'29"E
14.42'
16'34'53"
7.29'
C112
50.00'
97.72'
S38'42'42"E
82.89'
111-58'27"
74.09'
o f
/ INV jUi: 5 7.;/
/ TREE
G
l\ r
/
T
MpCGr1V \\��/ irI ° Co
CD
RIPRAP APRON SEE
\�\ 24'^ DETAIL 3SHEET C-7.0 / / T/
TREE 18•
��' I \ \ \\ \ \ \ k3O-� 0404-OEP TREE /� // i/�/ / y4� /// S
V S' 1 \ STA: 113+88.43, -26.90 LT �/ �MHSS )6.. \� \ \ \ TREE ` \
-`RIM ELEV: 622.13 INV: 610.94
o; IN
IN: 616.67' 8" PVC \� \ 2 \ \\ \ RE VE EXISTING FENCE
o INV OUT: 616.59' 8" PVC
V ' J A
718
20
%EH
OPHER J GROU�E �roF� �� v REEv�/BAND & WIFE V �,�1 1 A �4670-95-9484 ,,,- vv vv ���, v �� /ate TREE5874 PG: 112 v \\ SA �T���,�,., 1 v �,�� v /��/ / '
44 PG: 45 V / ?Z / 1�-�n,�_R1GHT `1 1 `PROPOSED 10'GREENVVAY11)
- A vv C
v - ------ -- -V �� c -
V v / V � -/s -�__v----- z� - �F _ ��MHSS
U6 T4E 7-�- i _� - - �� A RIM ELEV: 616.96'
IINV NV IN 595.9S' 4REBAR \ // \--n-�--F �._�- --/
EMMET M ELLIOTT III v / v-TRP--NL� _ 'E v + n- �- �i /
AND VALERIE ELLIOTT, --_n__'-
HUSBAND & WIFE v1 / / // v 7C� - / r
PIN: 4670-95-9431 // 4 / / - - 41'42_18"E F
DB: 6280 PG: 81 y // \�/ % / ��v ° 133.51' i� �T LST-
MB: 44 PG: 45 / -
s 23" TREE 40 LI-
18" RCS CLAS$ IV @ TREE
TF8, +\
E MHOI_ -
_ OA •
/ RIM ELEV: 617.88' \� i / l / /
O� INV IN(A): 597.88' \ • /� / /�- 18" • \
INV IN(B): 609.33' / / �-� / rREE TREE
/ y W 05 (7 INV IN(C): INACCESSIBLE DUE TO LADDER 0403-HVV
�C✓� INV OUT: 597.88' / NCDOTSTD. 838A M S \+
STA: 113+88.34 12.97 RT M ELEV: 818.28' \+
RIM: 615.330 V IN: 597.94' \+
a �O�Q� /tC INV: 612.83 • INV OUT: 597.88' \+\
E 4REBAR O �
RAF
PVI STA.11 17 34
PVI ELEA 615.95
AD'. 0.35%
K 143.07
50 00V C
HIGH POINT ELEV. 616.72
HIGH POINT STA'. 115+64 66
PVI STA.115 125
PVI ELEV.616 83
AD 90%
K 25 26
50 00' VC
620
PROPOS
DGRADE
620
---
0.65%
-
615
0.30%
-- -
--
----
-1.
39"
615
\
EXISTING G RAI
E
--
z
y
y PROF.
18" RCP CLASS I
610
O m
m
w N
INV:612.21
610
J
�z
w
:J >
�a
U
>m
K
ttX
r w
z
z
<
605
605
112+00
113+00
114+00
115+00
-L1- PROFILE
Hor. ScaleA"=20' I Vert. Scale :1"=2'
116+00
117+00
118+00
C/D
�
O
� F
�
zz
UO
N
O
O
N
3 U
O
CG
O
O O
d N
w O
Q Q
ro
In
O O
m
=
y ED
-
W
J_
LL
NO�/
fL/�L
L.L
W
Z
Q
J
z
Y 0
/�L //
0J Q 0
U3!oOz
W LZ Q O
se w LULL
0
J
U vo
D
O
z
O
SHEET NUMBER
C-4.3

11
EXISTING WEfL N
ALLEN MILLS HOMEOWNERS,
SEE ASSOCIATION, INC \
�— MHss PIN: 4680-05-6643
�W60DED —_�- _ —-- � ELEv: 6G9.4a•DB: 13656 PG: 323
INV 597.58' MB: 81 PG: 06
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
I CHORD
I DELTA
TANGENT
C113
50.00'
61.64'
S52-35'24"W
57.81'
1 70-37'46"
1 35.42'
C114
50.00'
88.52'
S37-11'16"W
77.40'
1 101-26'04"
1 61.13'
MNSS
.44' _---_—_fiRIM ELEV. 11
or597.72INvuo
__n---S14�� Y gEWER
.—��M gS�64VV60S�� 30RACT\2, B'-3WSACC
18"--__ss--- 6LZ$z-----A ��--OWNW_ — _ I� P_ SED'10'GRE SAY(--L1) \�� v ���vv i
V v
���'GF F
S1716'31W
99.33'
A_— / -- c1 G �,
/ C G — TREE
/ A
SFI HIGL EEK COMMUNIT
11;1/V TLASSOCI'ATION, IINC. A
R; n
�� �, -7 `\ 2�v/
�9snNITn?T�R �
DB: /a2sa F
�TR�i TIiRvE'� y'
\� y\ N \ SEESTRUC U� PLA B
Impact 2- Wetland 1c AA V
N �� �p (NWP# 14)
Grading/Fill
�F� PIIN: 46 05—a176 o n `I 0V 0.031-acre - Permanent
g3, / &NOODEB: 675 PG: 22\76
�B: 46 G: 109/ A u. B v
RIM ELEV: fN . 3'
INV IN! 7. 1'
A V vv �� VAST: 597s'
s \/ Nq O ET %
9E8QA.RQw,(X
C
\� 7
r \
\ REEv'
SPH,
4 '
BEGIGOt
(SIA:1211 7(
/
r
RIP—RAP
/
TR \
TR EE �\
11 __yc` \tea
Qb.CH SLAB /
II
PUBLIC O111�
' R GE EA4AENT AS
�7. SH VM ON /
pp�
T�P,
/ A U
46 PC: 109
TO ACCURATELY PLOT
TT,AZ'H SLAB \
R; n
LOW POINT ELEV. 609 52
Low POINT STA. 121+37 27
PVI STA.121 L33 73
PVI ELEV.609 30
0233%
— 46
5000'VC
615
615
P
OPOSEDGRADE
Y
/
r
STRU
SEES
TURE#1
RUCTU RE PL4N
ST-01 - ST-11
610
v
610
\
\
EXISTING GR
DE
\
605
600
w
605
�N
U�
600
wU
�m
X
a
118+00
119+00
120+00 121+00
-L1- PROFILE
122+00
123+00
S
yr�0
2
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
0
z
Y 0
�¢oO
U�oz
W LZ Q O
w wLL
00-0 a 0
J
U v�
D
0
z
z
0
cL
SHEET NUMBER
C-4.4

11
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
CHORD
DELTA
TANGENT
C115
75.00'
87.30'
S46'52'27"E
82.45'
66'41'21"
49.35'
C116
150.00'
154.46'
S50'43'09"E
147.72'
58'59'56"
84.86'
C117
225.00'
45.34'
S15'26'49"E
45 26'
11'32'45"
22 75'
PROPOSED 10' GREi yWAY(-L1)
HIGHLAND fR k CO�1M'tuN TY r ��
�S�SOCIATI t IN�S / /
NN 4680, 36A1 � F/
WNERS �� DB: 56,92 PG: 257
f155ul,IA IIVIv, IIJC iiG- MB! 45 PG: 48
PIN: 4680-05-6643 TREE A
— —
RIM+ECEV: fi12.99' _
"INV W: 597.3_.ZE
�bNv-avr. 5�[z3' � —
/
�610—
UTVMLf
ALLEN MILLS HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC
\\ \ \ LL 30' SANI YSERER EAS€!IE
�� v_ ACT 1 — _
PIN: 4680-14-5855
DB: 13022 PG: 319
-Qg 32PG: 268 —
— — ME:. 75 PG: 95
\ \ a \ \ MER: ACC
—
TRIBUTARY FOR
�A, \ CLARKE CREEK
eIn�SELEv: 618.90•
UNABLE TO OPEN MANHOLE TO COLLECT
\a \\
INVERT DATA
MB: 81 PG: 06 ,Cam' F
RIM ELEV: 609.73
INV IN: 597.4`j'.�
INV OUT: 59227 1
\\ �� !)��2EMDVEEXIISTJNG-F NC
��/ i _
�lb
675 \ ss--�� � �\ � jg•• A \
TRIE
j EXISTING WETLAND_TREE 0
/ `
_625
pSX �G- �/ �i� �� —__
�T, v v
a REp���
wvv
Z a
// / --/ // / / s°
— F/ C 2�-cf" �� // //// // // // / / JAMES JACKSON AND WIFE, v vv v v v 5 R A)26,.
DEBBIE JACKSON vv vv v77� vvww �w v
/ PIN: 4680-04-5483 v a- v vvv
o� c115� �!�� /// // // // //� / / DB: 7307 PG: 115 A vv `��
MB: 45 PG: 48 _ v vvv vvv vvv
/ / c �i� �%//�j�/ </ ALEXANDER R_ EEM1AN-vim �.p,� ���v
/ �675 AMY H. FREEMAN, v v �v vvv Av vv
•'// ��/ HUSBAND &-WIFE �vA �`vvvvAv vv� v
/
/ ND R IPEAPP H //�/ ' PIN: 4680-04-&.16\�\
4RP �tL , P 2°�-- �' / v v �O��^v v v
/ 9E¢11 ASPHALT //� � 6/� '�/ ALEXANDER ESCOBAR AND DB: 9647 PG: 7
SZ 2/ 115.97' ��-/ / �i WIFE, PAMELA C. ESCOBAR MB: 45 PG: 48
Civ q // i/ / \ PIN: 4680-04-5417 \\ \\ \ \
ND RDVVALIv/ // // / / / ER aAR OSEPH E. KIRKWOOD AND DB: 15279 PG: 13 \ O�
G cgr�R€TEAPaR%'&SL4/4 / WIFE, CYNTHIA A. KIRKWOOD \ MB: 45 PG: 48
1z3+0Y97 - / / /
/ / i / l / / PIN: 4680-04-4530
5a' I �. / j // / / i / / / L DB: 13004 PG:
7-��
s sr v /�/// �/�/// / / MB: 45 PG: 488
RO ERT JASON
F7F
o�
t'
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
20"
TREE
z3^\
TREE \ \
\� U
HIGH POINT ELEV. 611.59
HIGH POINT STA. 123+64 42
LOW POINT ELEV. 61029
LOW POINT STA. 124+7209
STA.125+83 31
PVI ELEA 611 33
AD 3 13%
K 15 96
59 09' VC
HIGH POINT ELEV. 615.89
HIGH POINT STA. 126+91 28
PVI STA.123+79 43
PVI ELEA 611 75
AD 2 63%
K 18.98
59 09' VC
PVI STA.124+72 03
PVI ELEV.619.99
AD.3.19%
K.15 65
59 09' VC
PVI
PVI STA.126+79 36
PVI ELEA 615 39
AD.5.11
K 9.78
59 09VC
620
r PROPOSED
GRADE
620
o IT
ao ��
%
-- ,
oNw
w
610
/ O
— — —
610
/
/
w
ov
EXISTING GRADE
ZU
605
a
w
605
123+UU
124+UU
125+UU
126+UU
-L1- PROFILE
Hor. ScaleA '=20' I Vert. Scale :i
12/+UU
128+UU
129+UU
W
J _
LL
�O�/
^LL
W
Z
Q
J
0
z
Y 0
��//
LL Q 0
U�oOz
W W QO
w LU
LL
00-0 OL 0
J
U vo
D
O
z
0
SHEET NUMBER cL
C-4.5

CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
CHORD
DELTA
TANGENT
C118
110.00'
118.37'
S40'30'01"E
112.74'
61'39'10"
65.64'
C119
50.00'
59.07'
S37'28'52"E
55.70'
67'41'28"
33.53'
C120
155.00'
113.14'
S24'32'49"E
110.65'
41'49'21"
59.22'
C121
280.00'
199.38'
S65'51'28"E
195.20'
40'47'58"
104.13'
V
Impact 3-Wetland le
(NWP# 14) GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
Grading/Fill 0 10 20 40
0.015-acre - Permanent
EXISTING WETLAN
MHSS I I _-
RIM ELEV. 614.67' MHSS
INV IN: 596115' RIM ELEV: 614.43'
INV OUT: 596.81' INV IN: 596.70' / �\
INV OUT: 596.53'
_ 4 1
roa
�F 402 20„ -
� A v - ;o�� s o Zv \ m EV '�W -1-- / 1
° ARC A \ �
r
23
ON
�� -,��ozo S --- 14./�%
r,� �\ T'''/ ' - \ --_
NO wqC / �\
c_
K IN CHARLES
3 WARD J. FITZGERALD AND //IT+\��\-• ����� �� _ % -�'�� �� - �� �_ - !_�%-_�;'_,-_%��/ _ M ONALD & WIFE,
_FE, DENISE N. FITZGERALD /\����\�\� �63�\\`� _ CAROL JONELLE
PIN: 4680-04-6238 O 620—_- -- -- - / McDONALD
DB: 6331 PG: 314 //�----___ -R1M�E#t5i-�.6a�`� _----- = ��91 L-�Idi?'W�_�
E MB: 45PG: 48 HUSBAND, DEOrT�,YLPKP:�0--;_=-A�R_aA - __ �� _ _ � invw�lN s�s:9��\ \-_\\ _ \=_ -_ - --_sue _ AIVSEB�$ObYDI-S�FF+C-T- PIN: 4680-03-9797
/ PIN 4680-05�� ��\; +Nv_au�33 _ -62s—_ _ — `� FREE �' C�US�bUNTY DB: 6111 PG: 139
i S �Ni�11A--,41X=A7€di 11YUY % - a yiEt3aRi �� - - ' /r _ �� �� - - ; _
DB: 14334 PG: -�� ���_��,: ��Am� ______-_-M_r$6$O-Y4-4164 MB: 42 PG: 110
MB: 45 PG: 48 640__WI E_-, IAND�FAPF"-RA�KOS91� I.�1CWARDJHJFFMAN s4o ,� \� _\ AU51=,-_�AYrM�$AHCEI — ,' ,-�!-D� 7510 PG: 1 KIMBER DORCE�ENN,
/ S. HUFFMAN 14 ETTE PFEIF�ER�-
67' SIR!•:���__---_= AN MARRIED WOMAN
4680-04-6097 PIN: 4680-0 - ��?r,�_
- - - _Lil}:�-6i'�6�C`=2-=Y %�__ = PI 4680-03-9727
DB: 6345 PG: 298 DB: 10424 PG: 292 4 REBAR ���- _ _ - A
/ / - - - MB: 45 PG: 48 / MB: 45 PG: 48 4 R R _ _ _ _ _ _ _— - - B: 16066 PG: 46
MB: 42 PG: 110 \
E
/
625
11
TREE V P OP ' GREENWAY (-L1)
� \ — RRA fEEV` 614.80'
INVJNL 544'
INV OUT: 596.93 f �'
F7F
PVI STA.12-0 H
PVI ELEV.614.81
AD 35%
KH 34
5909'VC
PVI STA.131— 55
PVI ELEV.611.79
AD 35 %
K 90
5909'VC
LOW POINT ELEV. 611.15
LOWPOINTSTA. 133+2609
HIGH POINT ELEV. 61273
H I GH POI NT STA. 13 2139
PVI ATA.134+13 64
PVI ELEA 612.96
AD.4.14
K1297
5909'VC
PVI STA.133+44 39
PVI ELEV.611.9fi
AD'. 3.16 %
K.1539
5909'VC
620
620
615-0,4
615
�-
--
---
2.
w�
610
610
w,
y m
Q w
PROPOSED
GRADE
a
605
605
129+UU
13U+UU
131+UU
e 132+UUvu v
133+UU
134+UU
13b+UU
0
Y 0
�¢oO
U�oz
LLJ LZ Q O
Y LLJ w LL
OL 0
J
U vCD
1r
0
0
0
cL
SHEET NUMBER
C-4.6

xJ
E
11
Impact 3-Wetland le
(NWP# 14)
Grading/Fill
CURVE TABLE
CHORD BEARING CHORD DELTA TANGENT
S77'36'09"E 15.05' 17"18'36" 7.61'
S79'24'57"E 18.17' 20'56'12" 9.24'
0.015-acre - Permanent I XISTING WETLAND -- INV OUT. 596.41 ..,�T "" S78'34'3fi"E 19.61' 2236'S4" 10.00'
/ C125 250.00' 108.78' S79-44'03"E 107.92' 24"55'48" 55.26'
C126 50.00' 20.26' N76'11'28"E 20.12' 23'13'09" 10.2T
- �- ---- - ----- _
/ i-L----_---- - - - - -\
I3EE --- - - - TREE 1
U�—
TREE /
MESS �
W �� _ � = — — _ — — __ it PROPOSED 10'GREENWAY(-L1) iJ
7- >� - ��'�u`=� =' --- ��--� 1 ) — �°P / RIMNV IN� 59637 '�
INV OUT: 596.
i
MH55 : �
05' E-NN=V:9612.EF 23 - --
VIN5fi.60
INV
OUT.
861_0 596.58 LIB
bb.HU :13+8
123 --
�i
ij p"F-
MESS
RIM ELEV: 614.25'
INV IN: 596.57'
NORTH
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
0
Ny\N
—_--_
-- -_-j__
�.-9
o
/i i%� % --- \
\
✓I �% _ _ _� -
--- _—_
- __ _-__ =_
--
- -- _-_
-_—_�_--
IINGW625
z - � l�� ��
�
R�
oAI M o
_
^I\✓T�rl
-- ��____--_—_—_—_—_ _
_— — —_—----_
_
— — ——_
�GINUTARN --_—�
�_
�,,�-+'u�ly�
SA373r
— _T—_�S � ,
c
Ar. 0E5
a
_
_ --- — _
_---
-
��.-------_
J06')
4R
AR
0.23'
NORTH OF �� \\
-
(14
1
z
a
MEss
RIM ELEV: 614.29'
UNA9LE To OPEN MANHOLE TO COLLECT
MARK L. POINDEXTER AND WIFE,
KMBERLY E. PONDEXTER
NOLAN W WALKER AN
WIFE APRIL D WALKER
KYLE KYLE MILLER AND—SPDUSE, 1 EI�JAMTN�IAA ��JRN=—= — --——M-YRISN'C.
\X
AMANDA MILLER vWIFE,vTAMEKA—VONi` AS— �_ =-d IALKA AND-
UM AiVD —
---�W_E�py�L: � �—
1��
JE AMIAH GIB$S LEE ANN—
R
�GIBBS, WUSBAND AND WIFE
i
INVERT DATA
PIN: 4680-13-0757
PIN: 4680-13-1797
_�Z
\ x�
_
PIN: 4680-13-2766 \�37�36— —`—�WI�E, ELTELI-bIRL14A---
�fQJZ�x55�
_—
_— _
_--p�N:-46�'0— 1 —�—�
PYN: 4680-13-5765
I
�I
o
N 0
DB: 6439 PG: 43
DB: 13663 PG: 136
DB: 16141 PG 251� �__����6853��786 --
CE �— _
- t1B' 136��nTAR--—
_
DB: 9509 PG 251
��
0
;z;;
MB: 42 PG: 110
MB: 42 PG: 110
MB: 42 PG: 110 MB: �10 �� max— �B:-1O�q-q---_
----- �4 PG: �10 --__
MB: 42 PG: 110
rye+01
ANDREW JOHN HUBREGIEN AND
SPOUSE, ANGELA SULLI AN LEIS
PIN: 4680-13-07 7
DB: 15806 PG: 17
MB: 42 PG: 110
I I
F7F
NING_Y�9LL
C F
F7F
LOW POINT ELEV. 61099
LOW POINT STA. 135,6522
HIGH POINT ELEV. 612.39
HIGH POINT STE, 136,7006
PVI ATA.1-61 25
PVELEV.612 54
AD 81 %
K17 80
5090' VC
LOW POINT ELEV. 610 83
LOW POINT STE, 138+03.14
PS38+15
PVI A.108
AD.1.72%
K29.13
5090' VC
PVI STE, 14+456
PVI ELEV012.925
AD.1 92%
K.52.17
100.00' VC
PVI STE, 135+69 05
PVI ELEV 610 79
AD 29%
K 15.18
50.00' VC
620
620
615
615
PROPOSE
GRADE
19
V
--0.917
610
z
(D
f9
610
w
K
w
O m
zN
U m
>
Ef z
EXISTING GRA
E
z
wz
W Ef
m
E
W U
N m
>
r
Qw
z
605
w
w
605
135+00
136+00
137+00
138+00
-L1- PROFILE
Hor. Scale:i "=20' I Vert. Scale:1"=2'
139+00
140+00
141+00
z
Y 0
Of¢oO
U�oz
W W LU
se w w LL
a 0
00-0
J � �
U vo
O
z
0
cL
SHEET NUMBER
C-4.7

/ _------ -` _ ___ _-- ..
� i - - -_-- _ - — ---- TREE
- - - - T-7 - -------__- a-----
_"- \ MHSS
- - PROP6SEB GREENWAS'(117
5• �� i c _ - _�_ -�_ _ _ 1f�9EE TO OPEN MANSIOLE TO COLLECT.,
�a INNS
L- i1
S/7
F F
-� S S
j`/ --`--- -� -
n`_=ri_==`
F _ - _ _ i _ - 67- S
' TREE I I
iL—
/ � t
v ��
�\ \ _ \ � 5- � RIP RAP
E�24'��
REPLACE EXISTING MH
4 REBAR
0405-MH
NCDOT STD. 840.54
1�1
�P.
STA: 144+31.71, 53.06 RT
RIM: 615.333
\
INV: 609.25
INV: 6095 29
u
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
CHORD
DELTA
TANGENT
C127
50.00'
105.05'
S55'13'45"E
86.77'
120'22'42"
87.27'
C128
50.00'
22.13'
S17'38'15"W
21.95'
25'21'18"
11.25'
C129
50.00'
21.16'
S18'11'24"W
21.00'
24'15'00"
10.74'
20' SANITARY SEWER R/W
AS SHOWN ON MB: 42 PG: 110
OWNER: CITY OF CONCORD
MHSS
RIM ELEV: fi2fi.25'
INV T. fi19.19' 8" PVC /a
RAP APRON SEE
'
TAIL 3 SHEET C-7.0�_6-HVV
XISTINGVVETLAND
HIGHLAND CREEK COMMUNITYDOTSTD.e3e.11
-_-
---_
ASSOCIATION, INC:144+17.93,-11.49LT-�-
PIN: 46$0-13-859,0:
607.560
- _ ---
DB: 4980 PG 228
:604.48
r
M ��42 PG:\10
v
\
`— —
--�
- Impact4-Wetland 1g605 (NWP#14)
a�
� -
L
0.001aere-Permaneill
nt
1
\F \
—
55- ___ys____55____-
-- --fin-
H
-F_ w
___
--�-- ��--n--n----
__ \ n_ ___55____55____
_ _
`7 c=n
- - - - - - - - - - -
- ----�----------
-
-rn
F
-
O
O
SWOF � \ I— F C --C" C C F F F
g R P G SI 1.23%
-610_
MH--� - ,
TREE\
gr -
ELEV-61a-97'
INV Ift 609.25 24"RCf'�\ \
\ JNy 00T: 804 22z 2a' RC`P Tip NLS—
PI
_ —
____ \j -- —ice _ 7 — ———— �
—�--
- -- L-------------------c----------
o \' _ _ `\ \ \ - - \ "POSE 10' CDNGIECT107V (�') m \
8EEv$Af ETC-4.94
V\ _ A
1 20' PDBBf DRAINAGE EASEME T\-62ftEBAR \ /
AS SHOWN ON B:: 42+PG: %EFFR-F�Y� CARWIC�ATVTJ V �� cgs. �, ---
o
v SPOIT�E, NIEL€P. CARWILE �6�� ----- ,� -�_,
1 PINt 4680J3-45-_
—
✓ tnl
-625- — _
�� DBl 11277 PG -M -�
\ MB: 42 PG: 110 -
yNUMENO ,PLC—-
i�N: v�680-13-4562 v -4 R€F3AR �
DB. 1 334 PGi303_;=-� /v C08 v--__ /
I _--A6AGORN
LANE
V
�
--
MB: 42 PG:�NO"i __� ��� 1 �� _ --, A-� �,
K
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
10 20
HIGH POINT ELEV. 012. fig
HIGH POINT STA. 141+26 68
PVI STA.142+85 58
PVI ELEA 611 47
AD.248%
K20.16
5 00' VC
LOW POI NT ELEV. 608 34
LOW POINT STA. 143,7033
HIGH POINT ELEV. 609.32
HIGH POINT STA. 144+51 03
PVI STA.144+6 37
PVI ELEV.009 58
AD.5 02%
K9 96
5 00' VC
PVI STA.145+40.38
PVI ELEV.606 77
AD.3 22%
K 15 52
5.00' VC
LOW POINT ELEV. 606 35
LOW POINT STA. 146+72 71
PVI ATA.146+9246
PVI ELEA 606 28
AD'. 3.10%
K16.14
5 00' VC
PVI STA. 141+34.58
PVI ELEA 612 92
AD.1 92%
K52.17
100 00VC
PVI STA.143+59.87
PVI ELEV.008 08
AD 06%
K9.88
5.00' VC
615
615
610
PROPOSED
GRADE
n
---
-0.33%
_
605
P'R
zPROP
--
- - - - - -
-----
'
wU
IN
:604.623
a
EXISTING
GRADE
�m
aw
600
600
141+00
142+00
143+00
144+00
-L1- PROFILE
Hor. Scale:i"=20' I Vert. Scale: V=2'
145+00
146+00
147+00
W
J_
LL
NO�/
fL/�L
L.L
W
Z
Q
^J
LL
0
z
Y 0
LLJ
�¢oO
U�oz
W W QO
Y w D_ LL
w O
J o
U vo
D
0
z
0
cL
SHEET NUMBER
C-4.8

CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
CHORD
DELTA
TANGENT
C130
50DOO'
42.22'
S30-15'09"W
40.97'
48-22'30"
22.46'
C131
50.00'
47.05'
S27-26'56"W
45.33'
53-54'56"
25.43'
11
/I
Boardwalk
\ EXISTING VVETLAN
/ I NO RIPadS
�1- STA:147+05.58= ET
l-Y3-STA:3000+37.86 �\
\ \ \NF—
�1 E `
INV IN: 595. 4'
z \
% —\
0�_3�,—
— - � ERINV UL_ 595.
SANITARY `Ti
_
•
5
I
_
o
30' _-- -_--
_ -yyq AND EASEMENT
J -OF-
�\ SS
I
r +
Z� p
-, �"
RIGHT
BP'.3000+00.00 DB: 2580 SACC% - --�---
OWNER: Ln--� SS -
ss_--
�`
1
m
-
--- n----55- I
---_zs---
�y�- �4 -A
/
V
--zS 31— -
ALE
_—PR_OPOSEDICONCRETE
F6I=TAIL 2 SHEET C-7.0
}
o
F
+7.9E3
frfl
�O
Y
rn
+�30
PC'. 3000 4 _ _ _ f \ _
T
0
F
F
10' GREENWAY (-Y4 )
C-4.15
HIGHLAND CREEK COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION, INC
PIN: 4680-03-6119
DB: 6527 PG: 324
MB: 48 PG: 12
RIP -RAP
DRAIN
T
a
A 1
C131 0 1�r—�C� _610OD F
—
S54'2fi'24'W ����� -- END PROJEC
C T
16.73 \V f ���—��� ) / �� 49+90_11 `Sri Oe. w �Tq
- _ -- N R G:6030551308 0 2SgY RrS
610—EA3TI 73.0353 Sr� �iy�.R Bp p40 w�
-610^ END CONSTRUCTION -Li- — `.U•� 2 9SF'�F�
- G-P 1" —� — STA:149+5
- 5.77 ---� —
- - - - - -- ---v---- _
-----\ 4TRP NLS
rn ---
-- PROPQSED 10'GREENWAY(-L1') / --- 1 o-----'- _ �� BP.4000+00.00 --------V
- - - - - -- /
J
---- --- -----------`�/ I�(
0)- - - - _ - ' _
/ „VA _--_ CN �/ /
AT A� 1 V� `PVT � T 1 / i
/
N 1A- i' — — — — " /
F?n F?n
� I
I
\ -Li- STA:149+50.76-
-Y4- STA:4000+51.49
I �
L J
PVI ATA.146+9246
PVI ELEA 606 20
AD.3.10%
K 16.14
50 00VC
HIGH POI NT ELEV. 60949
HIGH POINT STA. 140+25.15
PVI STA.140+16 20
PVI ELEA 609 71
AD.4.00%
K.1225
50 00' VC
615
615
PROPOSED
GRAD
610
610
605
EXISTING G
ADE
605
STA:
ELEV
49+55.77
607.88
600
600
147+00
148+00
149+00
-L1- PROFILE
Hor. Scale: 1"=20' I Vert. Scale:i "=2'
150+00
151+00
r
0
Z
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
W
J_
LL
NO�/
fL/�L
L.L
W
Z
Q
J
z
Y 0
LL Q 0
U�oOz
LZ Q O
W
YWw�
�00-0OL0
J � �
U v�
D
0
z
0
SHEET NUMBER
C-4.9

11
11
-
ALLEN MILLS HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, IWC, ___ \� \Vi�IAAI Impact1-Streaml �\ �V �' / r-
V PIN: 4670-OZ-7119 -� ��R 9SEX 1 ,G �N4V �-TOeT-II- LL -T (NWP#13) -- �— Tom- --4—
I Aw \ I I Bank Stabilization srQwcru RE# V Boardwalk
V DB: 142 P -i3�"' i I d o \ III A I 58 LF - Permanent SEE S7RUCT RE PLANS ST-01 - ST-11 = No Impacts
Ij¢B--�$�. PG: ,3j END CONCRETE APPROACH SLAB I D0I \ ` \ � I � � � � � �( I v/ / \ I I
\ -BEGIN BOTR9GVALK I, �\ I zy \ 1 \ I L `, 1 1 \
STA:1001+10.06' J /I l \ I Z \\ T,_ __ J I V/-- J i v/ I \ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
g- D V r. ��- �, 1 \ — ( \ff' / 0 1 0 10 20 40
-�ENDASPHALT I ZIo �I
y� BEGIN -CONCRETE APPROACH SLAB o I \v]{ 1
STA:1001+00.06' M \
\�__
N
nauI
F
lZ9
STA:1000+00.00'
NORTHING: 606553.5a
EASTING1 35 UWUWUW G1p0} I \ V I I h
N I
BEGIN CONSTRUCTI
O�ON -Yi-
/-STA:P p+25.47'
o \ _
� I
ILCTQ AA!o-TOE--
a
�c
END BOARDWALK 0 TONS OF CLASS 1
BEGIN BRIDGE #1 RIP RAP
STA:1001+46.23'
6 I �
\---- ----� ---- / �7--- �
v I w
A
/ '4
- - - - - r -
Impact 1 -Wetland 1a--------r`d�l--� � ice- � ---—�----rtJr� -� -�-4--
(NWP#14)
Grading/Fill
0.002-acre-Permanent
P. —t,! _
END BRIDGE #1
BEGIN BOARDWALK
STA:1002+46.23'
40 TONS OF CLASS 1
RIP RAP
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
CHORD
DELTA
TANGENT
C1001
90.00'
41.14'
N70-11'32"E
40.79'
26-11'33"
20.94'
�
J �
Q W
C!o
Y
YkQry
tt+
O
o
O o
ow
O
oOrw
��r
625 -
PROPO
EDGRADE
sTRucruRE#z
625
Low
LOW POINT ELEV'. 61706
POINT STA: 1666+4
PVI STA: 1666+63.16
PVI ELEV:617 02
AD:513%
K]06
92
PVI STA:1661+25.92
PVI ELEA 646.10
AD 40.
SEE STRUCTURE
PLANS ST-01 - ST
11
K 02
39 06' VC
4606'VC
0.50%
620
620
q9
-0.23%
�
- �
A
615
- -
615
BEGIN
ONSTRUCTION -Y
-
STA:10
ELEV:6
0+25.41
7.11
(7
y
\
610
U
W,I
of
- -
610
Z
PROPOSED
STREAM I
G AIDING I
/
PROPOSED
STREAM
/
/
605
/
EXISTIN
GRADE
605
602
/
/
602
/
1000+00
1001+00
1002+00 1003+00
u^ C'Y1-PROFILEQ
1004+00
1005+00
Lu J_ U)
LL L_0
fL/�L r
IL W
W Z
Z Z
</� O
I..L
0
z
Y 0
Lu
LL Q 0
U3!oOz
W LZ Q O
YWwLL
0
J � �
U vo
0
u
0
cL
SHEET NUMBER
C-4.10

11
11
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
CHORD
DELTA
TANGENT
C1002
95.00'
128.86'
S57-51'05"E
119.21'
77-43'12"
76.55'
C1003
90.00'
67.21'
S40-23'12"E
65.66'
42-47'25"
35.26'
C1004
50.00'
36.28'
S82-34'00"E
35.49'
41-34'11"
18.98'
y
\
I I on v v
I \I l A
o \
NORTHITJ.G' 606495.9464
�ASTI NG:'U681161.5663
\ \\ \ \ \ \ — `Sr \ \ \ \ \ i / / END CONST U 10 -Yi-
\� l�Avvvv vv vENDSTRUCTUR #E z\ v� EIP 4 REBARv v` '` STA.10 .76 `p
I 4 / / / TIE TO IX TING ID ALK �Z �
TRUCTURE #2� \ DBOARDVVAUK ``�\— \ N 1 / / / 10y45
BIN CONCRETE APPROAOH SLAB 1 \ A
Zm — \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ( \ SEE STRUCTURE PLANS
-ST-11 \ \ \ STA:' 007+11.49'
�—_
TB-AP-RZOACKSLAB \
— —
+7�1 A9' \ � / `.I I / l l / C I / —
I
v .A A � ---� AT
�\ o
��\ \ I\ �\ \ SHRYTHM- REDDY-CHINNI & \ \ \
\ \ \
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SPOUSE, VI NITHA
0 10 20 40 v \ -_� PIN: 4680-16-�HODHE
527 v vv
�\ DB: 14928 PG: 1 —
��\\ _93r 8,t- P,3 38 /\ \
v v - EIP 5 REBAi2, V I f
�I EIJMn.�
GAt� ISH T1�Y 8� SPO SE
RAJINI GANGI HETYY
SIN: �68 -1 -0551
DB: 1149 2 G: 1�
\
v
1
I
I
I
/
I
I
IT, \\ \ �'.�� f I\ I\ \ I M13:184\PG\ 38 ¢ /
I
I
I
I
(P _—__—I—�— ��
vv,Q�/
°
y vA� ������ ��� —_---
�� ��
v
oo�O
PROPOSED 10'GREENWAY
v
�
� \
,—�-�-1---�� �c 1�-- �------�--------------
'—
Fin
—
PVI STA.1111- H
PVI EL A — s4
AD 2 39
K 2009
50 00VC
/
�
y
m'w
-
END CONSTRUC
ON -Y1-
630
z y
E TO EXISTING SI
STA:10
ELE
EWALK
0+45.76
:633.39
630
PVISTA.10 622 9 73
PVI ELEV0%
AD 20%
K2271
50.00' VC
PVI I ELEV0
PVI E 3
AD.303%
K1307
50.00'
25 21 9
3% 21
VC
i
625
S
S
RUCTURE#2
E STRUCTURE P
ANS ST-01 - ST-11
0.31%
/
/ /
625
/
620
/
620
615
/
615
/
/
610
610
1 UU5+UU
1UU6+UU
1UU/+UU
1UU8+UU
-Y1- PROFILE
1 UU9+UU
1U1U+UU
1U1U+8U
I
W (/)
=J Z
I..L OO
�I L w
W Z
Z Z
< O
z
Y 0
Of¢oO
U�oz
O
wwQ
YWw�
Of00-0OL0
J
U vo
0
0
z
z
0
SHEET NUMBER
C-4.11

CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
I CHORD
I DELTA
TANGENT
C2000
20.00'
26.33'
S70-59'11"W
24.47'
75'25'47"
15.47'
C2001
25.00'
50.61'
N88'44'21"W
42.40'
115'5842"
39.99'
STA:2000+00.00'
NORTHING:605579.8777
— �c'' _'
J \
!'
FASTING: 1480209.1126
_ ,610i
/
REF,
q25
2 Op+00.00—
ISTINOWETUA
-------
-_'-,STAR 10+31.25
-Y2-STA:2000-46,31_
Z
S5
OWN 'i /�z r — Fi
+1.4'`�---
z -- J _— ,
i
/ —�
�OQ Ci' ��/ F F � F 1� F
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION -Y2- \� 106�
'_�-----� STA:2000+&131' �QQF'0 � 0 �� T
--7 -- --- r� 117
91
CONCRETE SWAGE
T --- BRIDGE SEE 6ETAIL 2 SHEET C-7.0'�
,MP pSPv' �9 i
PROPOSED 1ONNECTION (-Y2)
eP5\9 END CONSTRUCT Y2=
GpSCM611b0° TIE TO EXISTING —SIDEWALK
J' 6�y' GP STA:2002+62.11' /
SARAH F. SMITH, UNMARRIED, AND
O�—
BARBARA J. FLEETON, UNMARRIED x
PIN. 4680-05-0676
DB: 5947 PG: 233 qs
MB: 44 PG: 45
/ STA:2001+88.24'
NORTHING 605559.5470—
/ EASTING: 1479993.5203
Fzn
AC d�b
4s
/ � C
a -A— ---i
I /
1a P�
61-�6 9
MH55�EJ'. 6�1.
P�M DVS.
�NJ
Fzn
PVI 112111+98.15
PVI ELEA
AD.2.82%
K 1065
3000
619 20
VC
PVI 112111+5353
PVI ELEV.61939
AD
3000
55%
K659
VC
PVI STA.2002+4053
PVI ELEV.62366
AD.221
K1358
3000 vc
END CONSTRUCTION
TIE TO EXISTIN
STA:2002+62.1
-Y2-
3 SIDEWALK
ELEV:624.24
625
625
BEGIN CONSTRU
TION -Y2-
4 g0
STA:
620 E
000+51.31
EV:617.71
620
0.
5%—
1
EXIST. 8" P
INV., 616.866
/
V 1
/
/
\1
615
EXISTING
RADE
615
/
/
/
/
v
v
610
/
610
2000+00
2001+00
2002+00
-Y2- PROFILE
Hor. Scale :1"=20' I Vert. Scale:i"=2'
2003+00 2003+50
42 2
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
1
Lu (n
J Z
LL 0
a Lu
06 Z
Z Z
/J 0U
I..L
z
Y 0
Lu ly-
Of¢oO
U�oz
Lu Lu
YLuLULL
�00-0OL0
J � �
U vo
0
0
z
0
SHEET NUMBER
C-4.12

11
11
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
CHORD
DELTA
TANGENT
C3000
20.00'
20.73'
N54-14'45"W
19.81'
59'22'43"
11.40'
C3001
50.00'
27.50'
N8'47'57"W
27.16'
31'30'54"
14.11'
C3002
20.00'
34.60'
N4236'10"W
30.44'
99'07'19"
23.47'
'� \ T,I ( --_ _ - vaid-v-.` --- _ •I T\STA:3004+18.40'
I \ 1 / -- - „�-- 1 `----'
- - - - - \`__-
_ / /-\\ J� NUMENORE, LLC
// \_- `,
od�IH�l
EnSrif�
- - - / —
\
�\ PIN: 4680-13-4562
j �V `�-DB:,16�34�G: 303
JEFFREY D. CARWILE AND \\
3NV-I
_--\ -�
-`-�
_ ,� SPOUSE,
-MB--42 PG:/110-
DENIELE P. CARWIL`=
PIN: 4680-13-4598
ad�3a s- �" \\ ` -
DB: 11277 PG: .36
/ / r _
/� APR- t)10WNNEC1ION(--Y3<) �`__---
MB: 42 PG: 110\ N c041
\ TIE o Ini
-�
�Qll`Jd�Zb 9 NO NMOHS Stl
\ LIT3\3Stl33OVNRWO-oR �d .OZ
715,
o
�---c--------------= _
_ DI _—
—— --- — —
F F T F \ —gl
—
` E,\ y F
_— — — — — —
/ F
-,—
N6'57'30'E_
Ul5+
--610�qWUL,
225.04'
` l
—___—
Ja—vz—Z'sag �LOO AAI--
_— Oa\bZ NMI
�
i ,D �,F F-
\ �
� \ ,SZ9-;Q13I
� \ � � ---� � .L£rbk9 =A313 Wla —
HIGHLAND CD REEK Cv UNIT TY�
----` —/'
`��
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION -Y3-
— — — — / 4'
—-jjSs-Q�QTION, INC % — -ja
—
\`�\T�I
r F �I
'7
-STA:3000+42.86
1 e --- --------
_
PIN: 4680-1378590 _--� _
-
\__—
_ P.e:a000+ae.-u-STA:147+05.65=
ao
J -Y3- STA:3000+37.71
DB: 4980 PG: 228
MB: 42 PG: 110
0 l� 0
J J J
— — — — — — — — — — — — --
NORTH1NG: 603314 048
EAktNG: 1481670. 01
/
✓ \
c
1 \
lZ 8O 05-
BP:3000+00.00 + — Z
XISTING WETLAN-D
\
-
_ /
M_HO-1HORi
SS /
v
OAd ,9 ,6L'SO :L00 ANI
,SZ'9Z9 A313 MIN
SSHLN
+ Nd
u U!
_ I
ONOON00 JO ALIO a3NMO
OLL 'Od Zb m9LN NO NMOHS Stl
M/a N.AdVLINVS ,OZ
i 711 -.'S 11.w \
22 �O
ava;
33ah
F \
\ ,bZ
dva dla \ i . _s
g
33211-- \i`=
� �\O—
___ —— —_ -—77 _
�—_
-----_3�` —N ns�99�
J d
/�ZTIE
EXISTING SIDEW
04+05.25
LK
625
625
620
/
/ /
620
/
/
/
/
EXISTING GRADE
615
615
BEGIN CON
TIE TO PROPOSED
STA:3000t
ITRUCTION -Y3-
-L1-
.86
—
_
EXIST. 24" R
INV:612.58
610
605
ELEV:606.7
� — —
610
605
zo
3000+00
3001+00
3002+00
-Y3- PROFILE
HOr. Scale:l "=20' I Vert. Scale:l "=2'
3003+00
3004+00 3004+50
20
P�
Z
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
1
Lu (n
J Z
LL 0
a L Lj
06 Z
Z Z
< 0U
0
z
Y 0
/�L //
0J Q 0
U�oOz
wwQO
YLLILU
�LL
00-0a0
J � �
U vo
0
0
z
0
SHEET NUMBER
C-4.13

11
11
IIc _,—,ten ✓
270.98� YIE
S8g 29'55"E U
/
HIGHLkND CREhK COMMUNITY
v
\ Y�S%ATION, 4NC I j A
PINI: 4 8p-03�6119I I v
DB:\65�7v Pq� 324 \
z
MB: 48 PG 12 I
`v vv
\
v v v
\ \ \ \ / \ Lti- STA:14�+50.76-
---� \\ \ I �\-1/4-STA:400015 .49
1 I
BEGIN'FdNSSTRUCTIO\N -Y4-
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ STAA000+46.51'
V��---_
A V 1 1 V A S. A 1 1` �.
\O z
I I 11
U z z
1( 4\pm Od S69'
® \ 4000NIICBp,: OF):0.yy0' �SWN&T +4 3094�.
S.04��AGjdI \ I 1 \ z \ \
1t
I / /ET
Fin
I -�/ ( I I -4/ I
rl� INv
ITV
�v A A 6B
�60 15PINE
---� � - / L - - - - - -
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
CHORD
DELTA
TANGENT
C4000
50.00'
7.30'
S85-17'34"E
7.29'
8.21'57"
3.66'
-,,-
I - -,,V v /�� IV
vv
\V �� NV
l\
IV IV
I
/
Boardwalk
IV
- ---
/
No Impacts
�V ``11//
* --
STRUCTURE#
/ IV
`1/
i S E STRUCTURE PLANS ST-01 - ST-11
i-
o /�/
- --�� — ��/,`----- ----
----------------
��-
/ I/ IV J/
------------- ---
G/
F
I
/
`w---------
IV
IV IV
/ r 1
I \
( � I
ENDCONCRETEAPPR CH$LAB
BEGIN BOARDWALK 18 PINE
STA:4001+16.79'
END ASPHALT
BEGIN CONCRETE APPROACH SLAB
STA:4001+06.79'
-�- - - - - - - - - - - - - ---j /-- " - /� --- �r---
iREE-------------'df Z
Jy V J
/ NV 2
/ PROPOSED 10' GREENWAY (-Y4) 'Q
NV J 2
�7 ----------------- ---- -----------��-------r -
XISTING WETL4ND / J
Low POINT ELEV. 607.55
LOW POINT STA: -0+82 20
PVI A A:4000+85.15
PVI ELEV:607.27
AD:4.53%
K 1103
- 5000'VC
PVI STA4001+61 59
PVI ELEV:60921
AD:223%
K 22 40
50. DD'VC
615
615
EE STRUCTURE P
ANS ST-01 - ST-11
\
Y
\
4
Oo o
ROPOSED GRADE
\
610
�rw
�y
610
v
0.30%
�_
25
BEGIN CONS
RUCTION -Y4-
TIE TO FROPOSED
605
-L1-
TA:4000+56.51
ELE11:601s5
\
605
E
USTING GRADE
-
600
�----------
- - -- --
- - -
- - - - -
600
SANITARY
XIST.
SEWER LINE
B" PVC
5,647
CROSSING
595
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
595
4000+00
4001+00
4002+00
-Y4- PROFILE
Hor. Scale:i"=20' 1 Vert. Scale)"=2'
4003+00
4004+00
\I
NpFtTH
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
1
Lu (n
J Z
LL 0
�X� LJJ
W Z
Z Z
< O
0
z
Y 0
�¢oO
U � wQUL
wO
YLuLULL
�00-0OL0
J � �
U v�
D
0
z
0
SHEET NUMBER
C-4.14

11
11
BEARING CHORD DELTA TANGENT
HIGHLAND CREEK \
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION,
TABLE INC
PIN: 4680-03-6119
END BOARDWALK MB: 48 PG: 12 TRP NLS
'47"E 13.2fi' 9'30'23" 6.65' / 1 BEGIN BRIDGE#2 "pa END BRIDGE#2
_ / 1 STA:4006+29.71' NWP# 13 BEGIN BOARDWALK
/ ( ) STA:4007+29.71'
2 1 / Bank Stabilization
y 1 _ 140 LF -Permanent END BOARDWALK
\�\ BEGIN BRIDGE?q /
Boardwalk J,�� 1 �``II''-7 — �\ STA:4007+69.71'
SFRU TURE \ \ /
No Impacts �� DRAIN SEE STRucru l�LCNs sr ol-srr-11 ------
z�
,----� - _� ��� N
J I /-__
CURVE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
CHORD
��--.—.TING
1 1 1 I
�/GEIILAND
I III
RP
II /1 n
1 I
T
1
1
1
! I
620
1 \� I I III j
I �iil
Impact6-Wetlandlk
(NWP# 14)
Mechanized Clearing
[/7/
0.07-acre-Temporary
ItILI
—�
NLS
� �
r
Impact 5-Wetland 1i
(NWP# 14) NORTH
Mechanized Clearing
0.21-acre - Temporary
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
END BRIDGE#3
?� BEGIN BOARDWALK
STA4008+69.71'
—S� — -/----1�—
Boardwalk F
No Impacts / W
1\il
1 �V I Y/ �PIPE�VT—PC15P'/
r�tlG
1 : / // / 7I555EE/NOTE /#11
�� w
IS
�i�v I RQft ESEL*10' GREE\IWA�<
L / ___ ��/ / �� 24" TkE
---------------- o _
• 620
L
L
PROPOSEDGRADE
615
SEE
TRUCTURE#3
STRUCTURE
LANS ST-01 - ST-1
y
a�
¢w�
n
���
615
w^
�No
o+�
oNo
a^�
oo
c��
Qmo.
o
¢m
m°mc
❑zd
wz
C7 r w
F EdQ
O n
W
w 0 y
610
610
605
/
605
PROPOSED
STREA.
\
600
— ----�
600
I
I
I
I
�\
1
1
PROPOSED
STREAM
GRADING
/
/
v
v
1
1
I
595
LAI
595
4004+00 4005+00
4006+00
-Y4- PROFILE
Hor. Scale:i "=20' I Vert. Scale :1 "=2'
4007+00
4008+00
4009+00
C/D Z
YD O
�4 F
� Zz
O
U N 1 O
0
0o wo �
0 o m
y0 -
WW
J Z
NL L_0
fL/�L r
IL W
W Z
Z Z
< O
Y 0
�¢oO
U�oz
wwQO
se W LULL
�00-0a0
J � �
U vo
0
u
0
U SHEET NUMBER
C-4.15

h
E
11
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
I RADIUS
LENGTH
I CHORD BEARING
I CHORD
DELTA
I TANGENT
C4002
1 50.00'
1 31.87'
1 N71-07'18"E
1 31.34'
1 36-31'28"
1 16.50'
/
END CONSTRUCTION -Y4-
S T(SPROPOS€DITE BY OTHERS
STK4013+46 84'
56.18' OFF:0.00'
3: 603096.6017
1482849.9934
'-END C%C EAP7NACMSLAB 27i' (REE y1
EG C CR TE PAV E WAN
�— \\ \ \—A:412+05.5 'OF '0.0 /� // /�'T
---------------------/-- — — — — 4---- — —
D �- ---�- �-- y, / /
= SEES VRUCRE PLANS SST- 1 \\\\ \ \\DSTR Al//i // --/ 5 /
BoaNwaI 'B NDLR/ii
E C NC TE ACH
—_-z-P POS`EQ7`D-dREENWAY�' No Impacts s ao 1+ 3 oF�
/i/
T�v ' F E E
/�' / // / /� / / /� F o ASEo)
/ ( C4002
IT III
r" / �/' '°� ,��� '_ - -ram- ./
T / —
-, �; j� / / • l- /l / / --
CD
i 24"TREE d5
�
i
'-EXISTING WETL [ %
5 REBAR
-24' TREE \ ` i�
"— /
/ i /i i.. _i
19'-TAEE TREE j'.9
21" TREE #4
111
J
O
2 .. EE 27" TREE
20" TREE /9
19' TREE _
•
rm
_ - 2182.75
�i \
J(
9 z
- 4,E
— — �•�Fi' ..��
i 1
625
\
R?R
PVI I EL A 611 5 27
PVI ELE 31% 54
AD 3a1 °o
K38 v
59 09� vc
HIGH POINT ELEV: 616 78
1 9 23]2.5]
HIGHPP OSTLEV 616
PVI ELE D 3 30% 99
K15.14
K1514o
59 09vc
620
Y
620
�m
o�
SEE
STRUCTURE PL
S ST-01 - ST-11
PROPOSED GR
DE
615
//
615
61%
T,
000
/
610
END CONSTRUCTION -Y4
610
/
/
TIE TO PROPOSED SITE BY OTHER
STA:4013
/
ELEV:615.7
/
PR
OPOSED GROUN
/
TT
605
/
/
605
/
EXISTING
GRADE
/
/
600—��--
�—
— — —
---
600
4009+00
4010+00
4011+00 4012+00
-Y4- PROFILE
Hor. Scale: 1"=20' I Vert. Sozle:, "=2'
4013+00
4013+60
51
m
NORTH a
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
Lu J_ �
LL L_0
/L/•�L r
I L w
W Z
Z Z
J/•� O
I..L
z
Y 0
�¢oO
U�oz
LZ Q O
W
YWw�
Of � OL 0
J
U v�
0
u
0
cL
SHEET NUMBER
C-4.16

FINISHED GRADEED
2:1 (H:V) OR FLATTER
GRADE
ELEVATION
4"THICK CONCRETE
SLOPE PROTECTION
SEPARATION
GEOTEXTILE
AGGREGATE
(NO.57 STONE)
FOOTING
4"DIA. PERFORATED
DRAIN PIPE,
IF REQUIRED
(SEE NOTE FOR PIPE)
04 NO. 57
STONE
�9
�T
TOP OF
IFOOTING
SAW CAP UN-
TOP OF WALL
I EXTENSION
OVERHANG
/2 - 11/2„
WALL BATTER
a
5.5 - 9 DEGREES
H
APPROVED SEGMENTAL RETAINING
w
WALL (SRW) UNIT (TYR)
s
(SEE NOTE FOR SRW UNITS)
vP
WALL FACE
H
IF, �
� Q
BOTTOM OF WALL
10" MIN
91, EMBEDMENT
1IN MIN PROPOSED 411 18 MIN
BOTTOM OF CONCRETE
FOOTING SIDEWALK
STANDARD SEGMENTAL_ GRAVITY WALL WITH SLOPE
ADEE ROADWAY PLANS FOR FINISHED GRADE DETAILS.
SEGMENTAL GRAVITY RETAINING WALL
11
Not to Scale
QlATIMI OREENSAvwl DTM
A
SWALE BRIDGE
PLAN VIEW
.s@soc lMax)
FlomiOry Or
was mN
i iia cui fm(oy'oc(MAp PIRIEMETALFORM
SECTION B-B
10' WIDE SWALE BRIDGE
ALIGNMENT BEGIN STATION END STATION
{1- 111+46.50 111+56.50
{1- 1-5.64 148t)5.64
-ra )aayss.fi) I )ao1+)sn
wMINDEwRa
of oE6��MN
AENECEs° 6END� 8
T.
TI 111paAx�PAw,
B
.4@11 Max 14 N. ARK
w,BTIRRDPs,
N
" IN"`II,
SECTION C-C NECEeARv.
,IMAAL a°r�� �DETopM. FORRENF [11
REEE A E
#5@,L. MT
B @,) MAx
PIRcE ME RT FORM
CONCRETE SWALE BRIDGE DETAILS
DETAIL 3
STANDARD BASE DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Natural Natural
Ground 21 D Ll Ground
d
B Min. D= 1 Ft.
Max. d= 1 Ft.
B= Pipe Diameter (Ft.)
Type of Liner= Class B Rip -Rap
DITCH STATION RIP RAP (TONS)
-L1- 103+11.47 LT 3
-L1- 113+88.45 LT 3
-L1- 144+08.08 LT 10
SECTION A -A
NOTES
1. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS AA(4500 PSI)CONCRETE.
2. CONCRETESLABTOBEAMINIMUMOF6" THICK, MEASUREDTOTOPOF
GALVANIZED STAY IN PLACE METAL FORM.
3. TEMPORARY SHORING SHALL BE USED TO SUPPORT GALVANIZED STAY IN
PLACEMETALFORMSWHENCON CRETE ISPLACED.PRIOR TO GALVANIZED
OR FABRI CATION, CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT PROPOSED GALVANIZEDD STAY
IN PLACE METAL FORM SPECIFICATION AND HALL BRING REMOVED
ATE ENGINEER
FOR APPROVAL . CUREDTEMPORARY SHORING SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER
CONCRETE HAS CURED.
4. FASTENEDI I S OF HSHEET METALNIZED
CREW STAY IN PLACE FORMS SHALL BE
FASTENED WITHSHEETM ETAL SCREWS ATVEHICLE
O.C.
5. ASSUMED LIVE LOAD =90 PSF OR H-10 VEHICLE LOADING (20,000 LBS).
6. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A TESTING AGENCY VERIFY AN
ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE OF 1 50 KSF AT THE CONCRETE GRADE
BEAM LOCATIONS. PROVIDE TEST RESULTS TO ENGINEER PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION OR FABRICATION. IF SPECIFIED CAPACITY IS NOT ACHIEVED,
SOIL IMPROVEMENTS OR STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS MAYBE NECESSARY.
/. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH ENGINEER TO LAYOUT CENTER OF
SWALE BRIDGE AND SEAT ELEVATIONS IN FIELD. SLOPE OF GRADE BEAM TO
MATCH CROSS SLOPE OF SLAB.
8. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF BRIDGE TO MATCH GREENWAY.
9. ALLDIMENSIONSAND NOTES ARE TYPICAL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
10. ALL REBAR CLEARANCES SHALL BE 2" MIN. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
Not to Scale
DETAIL 4
STANDARD BASE DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Natural Natural
Ground 2.1 D Ll Ground
d
B Min. D= 1 Ft.
Max. d= 1 Ft.
B= Pipe Diameter (Ft.)
J
w
0
z
Y 0
LU
Of<
LL � U
wwQO
�1Ww�
��a0
J
U vo
C,
0
0
z
0
SHEET NUMBER U
C-7.0

EROSION CONTROL
SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL PROCEDURES
STORM DRAINAGE NOTES
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
i
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN WITHIN THESE PLANS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
APPLICABLE NCDEQ EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REGULATIONS.
2. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
NORTH CAROLINA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REGULATIONS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE, AND U.S. SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE REGULATIONS.
3. ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE IN COMPUANCE WITH REGULATIONS OF THE NATIONAL
POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) STORM WATER GENERAL PERMIT.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DILIGENTLY AND CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL
DEVICES AND STRUCTURES TO MINIMIZE EROSION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN CLOSE
CONTACT WITH THE NCDENR EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR SO THAT PERIODIC INSPECTIONS
CAN BE PERFORMED AT APPROPRIATE STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION.
S. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED CONTINUOUSLY,
RELOCATED WHEN AND AS NECESSARY, AND SHALL BE CHECKED AFTER EVERY RAINFALL.
SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY AND SHALL BE WATERED, FERTILIZED,
RESEED AND MULCHED AS NECESSARY TO OBTAIN A DENSE STAND OF GRASS.
6. STABILIZATION IS THE BEST FORM OF EROSION CONTROL. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WHICH ARE
NOT OTHERWISE STABILIZED SHALL BE TOP SOILED AND SEEDED, TEMPORARILY OR
PERMANENTLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA SEDIMENT CONTROL REGULATIONS.
PERMANENT SEEDING AND GRASS ESTABLISHMENT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO PROJECT
COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE GROUND COVER ON EXPOSED SLOPES WITHIN 7 CALENDAR
DAYS FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF GRADING. PERMANENT GROUND COVER FOR
ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING
COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
8. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 15
DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION OR AFTER THE TEMPORARY MEASURES ARE NO
LONGER NEEDED. TRAPPED SEDIMENT AND THE DISTURBED SOIL AREAS RESULTING FROM THE
DISPOSITION OF TEMPORARY MEASURES SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED TO PREVENT
FURTHER EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION.
9. WHERE SEDIMENT IS TRANSPORTED ONTO A PAVED OR PUBLIC ROAD SURFACE, THE ROAD
SURFACE SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE END OF EACH DAY. SEDIMENT SHALL BE
REMOVED FROM THE ROADS BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING AND TRANSPORTED TO A SEDIMENT
CONTROL DISPOSAL AREA. STREET WASHING SHALL BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER SEDIMENT IS
REMOVED IN THIS MANNER.
10. WHEN A CRUSHED STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE HAS BEEN COVERED WITH SOIL OR HAS
BEEN PUSHED INTO THE SOIL BY CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, IT SHALL BE REPLACED WITH A
DEPTH OF STONE EQUAL TO THAT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION.
11. ALL DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SILTATION. INEFFECTIVE PROTECTION
DEVICES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPLACED AND THE INLET CLEANED. FLUSHING IS NOT AN
ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF CLEANING.
12. DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT, SOIL STOCKPILES SHALL BE STABILIZED OR
PROTECTED WITH SEDIMENT TRAPPING MEASURES. THE APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
TEMPORARY PROTECTION AND PERMANENT STABILIZATION OF ALL SOIL STOCKPILES ON SITE
AS WELL AS SOIL INTENTIONALLY TRANSPORTED FROM THE PROJECT SITE.
GRADING
1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOCATION AND PROTECTION OF ALL EXISTING
UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION, GRADING,
OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
FOR PROPER IDENTIFICATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE. CONTRACTOR
SHALL ALSO CONTACT THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO EXCAVATION.
2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF ANY UTILITIES, CURB
& GUTTER, PAVEMENT, LANDSCAPING, ETC. THAT MAY BE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
DAMAGED ITEMS SHALL BE REPAIRED TO AT LEAST THE QUALITY OF WORKMANSHIP FOUND
IN THE ORIGINAL ITEM.
3. ALL AREAS SHALL BE GRADED FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE.
4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION
CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION
OR UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION AND APPROVAL.
5. IN ORDER TO ENSURE PROPER DRAINAGE, MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 0.50% SLOPE ON THE CURB.
6. ALL MATERIALS USED FOR FILL OR BACK -FILL SHALL BE FREE OF WOOD, ROOTS, ROCKS,
BOULDERS OR ANY OTHER NON-COMPACTABLE SOIL TYPE MATERIAL. UNSATISFACTORY
MATERIALS ALSO INCLUDE MAN-MADE FILLS REFUSE DEBRIS DERIVED FROM ANY SOURCE.
7. ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS REFLECT FINISHED GRADES. REFER TO THE
PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION DETAILS TO ESTABLISH THE CORRECT SUBBASE OR AGGREGATE
BASE COURSE ELEVATIONS.
8. ALL CONTOURS ARE IN REFERENCE TO THE BENCHMARK AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE
CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO GROUND BREAKING.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY TO TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING
GRADE.
10. THE LIMITS OF CLEARING SHOWN ON THE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN IS BASED
ON THE APPROXIMATE CUT AND FILL SLOPE LIMITS, OR OTHER GRADING REQUIREMENTS.
11. LIMITS OF PROPOSED SLOPES ARE INDICATED IN THE PLANS, DETAILS AND STANDARD
DRAWINGS. THE MAXIMUM SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED A 3:1 (HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL)
12. COORDINATE ALL CURB AND STREET GRADES AT INTERSECTIONS WITH THE DESIGNER.
13. ALL DEBRIS FROM CLEARING OPERATIONS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER.
14. HAUL ROADS USED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE OUTSIDE THE STREAM TOP OF BANK
TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. HAUL ROADS SHALL FOLLOW THE NATURAL CONTOURS OF THE
TERRAIN IF POSSIBLE, A 6'. COURSE OF g5 STONE SHALL BE SPREAD OVER HAUL ROADS IN
AREAS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO WET CONDITIONS. PROVIDE SUBSURFACE DRAINS IN SEEPAGE
AREAS OR SEASONALLY WET AREAS.
ACREAGE SUMMARY
1. PROJECT LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (LOD): 9.6 ACRES
2. PAVED GREENWAY WITHIN LOD: 2.4 ACRES
1. PRIOR TO CLEARING AND EARTHWORK ACTIVITIES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL
EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SPECIFIED AND AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. DURING EACH
PHASE OF SITE CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST, RELOCATE, AND/OR
REINSTALL AS APPUCABLE ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM
THE SITE.
2. SILT FENCE AND TREE PROTECTION FENCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AROUND THE PERIMETER
OF ALL EARTHWORK AREAS TO PREVENT SEDIMENT TRANSPORT ONTO NON -SPECIFIED
PROJECT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.
3. SILT FENCE FILTER BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS
COMPLETE AND LANDSCAPING IS INSTALLED.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY CLEAN UP AND REPAIR ALL EROSION DAMAGE AFTER
DISCOVERY AND REINSTALL ADEQUATE CONTROL MEASURES AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT
REOCCURRENCE OF DAMAGE.
S. ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN
CALENDAR DAYS AND AFTER ANY STORM EVENT OF GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES OF
PRECIPITATION DURING ANY 24 HOUR PERIOD. ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE
MAINTAINED UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN OBTAINED.
6. STABILIZATION MEASURES SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE IN PORTIONS OF
THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED,
BUT IN NO CASE MORE THAN 7 DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION
OF THE SITE HAS BEEN TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. CONTRACTOR SHALL
INSTALL TEMPORARY GRAVEL DRIVEWAY AT EACH.
7. CONSTRUCTION POINT OF ACCESS TO LIMIT DEPOSITS OF EARTH AND OTHER HAULED
MATERIALS ONTO THE ADJACENT LOT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUTINELY CLEAN ALL
SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AND DEBRIS FROM ROADWAY AS THEY OCCUR.
MAINTENANCE PLAN
LALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DEVICES WILL BE CHECKED BY THE
CONTRACTOR FOR STABILITY AND OPERATION FOLLOWING EVERY RUNOFF PRODUCING
RAINFALL, BUT IN NO CASE LESS THAN ONCE EVERY WEEK. ANY NEEDED REPAIRS WILL BE
MADE IMMEDIATELY TO MAINTAIN ALL PRACTICES AS DESIGNED.
2. MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AS FOLLOW:
.TEMPORARY SILT FENCE- REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE
ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE NEXT RAIN AND TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON THE
FENCE. AVOID UNDERMINING THE FENCE.
.TEMPORARY CHECK DAM- REMOVE SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION BEHIND THE DAMS AS NEEDED
TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO CHANNEL VEGETATION. ADD STORE TO DAMS AS NEEDED TO
MAINTAIN DESIGN HEIGHT AND CROSS SECTION.
-STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION- REMOVE SEDIMENT AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE
ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE NEXT RAINFALL.
.TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH- INSPECT TEMPORARY DIVERSIONS ONCE A WEEK AFTER EVER
RAINFALL. IMMEDIATELY REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM THE FLOW AREA AND REPAIR THE
DIVERSION RIDGE. CAREFULLY CHECK OUTLETS AND MAKE TIMELY REPAIRS AS NEEDED.
WHEN THE AREA PROTECTED IS PERMANENTLY STABIUZED, REMOVE THE RIDGE AND THE
CHANNEL TO BLEND WITH THE NATURAL GROUND.
3. ALL GRADED AREAS WILL BE SEEDED, FERTILIZED AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO
SPECIFICATIONS IN THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL TO
MAINTAIN A VIGOROUS, DENSE, VEGETATIVE COVER WITHIN SEVEN (7) WORKING DAYS OR
FOURTEEN (14) CALENDAR DAYS (WHICHEVER PERIOD IS SHORTER) OF COMPLETION OF ANY
PHASE OF GRADING. IF WORK ON THE PROJECT CEASES FOR MORE THAN THE
AFOREMENTIONED LENGTH OF TIME, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL HAVE TEMPORARY
VEGETATIVE GROUND COVER ESTABLISHED AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MAINTAINED.
-CONTACT FOR MAINTENANCE: GEORGE BERGER [phone] (CITY OF CONCORD)
TORI GOLASZEWSKI [phone] (CONSULTANT)
SEEDING SCHEDULE AND SEEDBED PREPARATION
SEEDING SCHEDULE
SEED, MULCH, AND FERTILIZE AREAS ACCORDING TO THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL.
1. PROTECTIVE COVER MUST BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS, GRADED SLOPES, AND
FILLS WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED OR HAS
TEMPORARILY CEASED.
SEEDBED PREPARATION
1. GRADED SLOPES AND FILL - THE ANGLE FOR GRADED SLOPES AND FILLS SHALL BE NO
GREATER THAN THE ANGLE WHICH CAN BE RETAINED BY VEGETATIVE COVER OR OTHER
ADEQUATE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES OR STRUCTURES. IN ANY EVENT, SLOPES LEFT
EXPOSED SHALL, WITHIN 14 WORKING DAYS OF COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF GRADING, BE
PLANTED OR OTHERWISE PROVIDED WITH GROUND COVER, DEVICES, OR STRUCTURES
SUFFICIENT TO RESTRAIN EROSION.
2. GROUND COVER - WHENEVER LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY IS UNDERTAKEN ON A TRACT
COMPRISING MORE THAN ONE ACRE, IF MORE THAN ONE CONTIGUOUS ACRE IS UNCOVERED,
A GROUND COVER SUFFICIENT TO RESTRAIN EROSION MUST BE PLANTED OR OTHERWISE
PROVIDED WITHIN 14 WORKING DAYS ON THAT PORTION OF THE TRACT UPON WHICH FURTHER
ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION IS NOT BEING UNDERTAKEN.
3. SURFACE WATER CONTROL MEASURES TO BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS.
4. AREAS TO BE SEEDED SHALL BE RIPPED AND SPREAD WITH AVAILABLE TOPSOIL 3" DEEP.
TOTAL SEEDBED PREPARED DEPTH SHALL BE 4" TO 8" DEEP.
5. LOOSE ROCKS, ROOTS, AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SURFACE
SO THAT THEY WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF VEGETATION.
SURFACE FOR FINAL SEEDBED PREPARATION, AT FINISH GRADES SHOWN, SHALL BE
REASONABLY SMOOTH AND UNIFORM.
6. IF NO SOIL TEST IS TAKEN, FERTILIZER AND LIME SHALL BE ACCORDING TO SEEDING
SPECIFICATIONS.
7. IF SOIL TEST IS TAKEN, PROVIDE LIME AND FERTILIZER ACCORDING TO THE SOIL TEST
REPORT.
8. LIME AND FERTILIZER SHALL BE APPLIED UNIFORMLY AND MIXED WITH THE SOIL DURING
SEEDBED PREPARATION.
1. ALL STORM DRAINAGE PIPE WITHIN PUBLIC ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAYS TO BE CLASS III
REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE PER NCDOT STANDARDS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. FLARED END SECTION INVERTS ARE SET AT OR SLIGHTLY BELOW EXISTING GRADE. VERIFY
ELEVATIONS IN FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTING PIPE SYSTEMS.
3. A MINIMUM GRADE OF 0.50% SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON ALL PIPES.
4. PIPE LENGTHS INDICATED ON PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY.
5. ALL INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED AT THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS EACH DAY.
6. NO PIPES ARE TO BE INSTALLED AND LEFT OPEN OVER NIGHT. ALL PIPE WORK MUST BE
CLOSED AND PROTECTED AT THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS.
7. SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE FACILITIES MAY BE REQUIRED IN THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY IF
DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE INSPECTOR.
8. UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING
STANDARDS IN ADDITION TO OTHER APPLICABLE CRITERIA:
9. NO MORE THAN 500 LINEAR FEET OF TRENCH MAY BE OPENED AT ONE TIME.
10. EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF TRENCHES.
11. EFFLUENT FROM DENATURING OPERATIONS SHALL BE FILTERED OR PASSED THROUGH AN
APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE, OR BOTH, AND DISCHARGED IN A MANNER THAT
DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT FLOWING STREAMS OR OFF -SITE PROPERTY.
12. MATERIAL USED FOR BACK -FILLING TRENCHES SHALL BE PROPERLY COMPACTED IN ORDER
TO MINIMIZE EROSION AND PROMOTE STABILIZATION.
13. RESTABILIZATION SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL REGULATIONS.
14. APPLICABLE SAFETY REGULATIONS SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH.
15. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING AN EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION
PERMIT FROM THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL
RECOURSES FOR ANY NEW OFF -SITE BORROW AREA. THE CONTRACTOR MAY USE AN
EXISTING BORROW AREA PROVIDED THAT IT IS CURRENTLY PERMITTED UNDER THE
SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT OR THE MINING ACT.
GENERAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AT LEAST ONCE A
WEEK OR AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT, AND REPAIR IF NECESSARY, TO ENSURE THAT
ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE FUNCTIONING PROPERLY.
2. STABILIZATION OF DISTURBED AREAS SHALL PROGRESS WITH PIPE INSTALLATION. AT NO
TIME SHALL PIPE INSTALLATION PROGRESS MORE THAN 500 FEET AHEAD OF FINE
GRADING, SEEDING, AND MULCHING OPERATIONS.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN STORM DRAINAGE DURING PIPE INSTALLATION.
4. DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE GRADED DAILY TO
PREVENT PONDING OF STORM WATER RUNOFF AND UNNECESSARY SOIL EROSION.
5. THE ROADWAY CUT SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND STABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH WORK
DAY WITH STONE MATERIAL, AND GRADED TO MATCH NORMAL GUTTER LINE ELEVATIONS
AND SLOPES SO THAT NORMAL DRAINAGE WILL BE PROVIDED.
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATION AND PROTECTION OF
EXISTING ABOVE AND BELOW GROUND UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES. ANY AND ALL MAINS
OR INDIVIDUAL SERVICES DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO
ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.
7. SECURE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DURING TRENCHING AND BACKFILLING OPERATION.
8. SEEDING AND MULCHING IS REQUIRED FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS.
9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
COMPANY, INC. PRIOR TO EXCAVATING AT OR NEAR SEWER MAINS, WATER MAINS, AND GAS
MAINS.
10. WHEN EXISTING FENCES ARE MOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
SECURE PETS WITH TEMPORARY FENCING UNTIL PERMANENT FENCING IS RESET.
11. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO MAINTAIN CONTINUOUS SANITARY SEWER FLOW AT ALL EXISTING
SANITARY SEWERS.
12. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO MAINTAIN CONTINUOUS WATER SERVICE TO ALL RESIDENCES.
13. ANY STOCKPILING OF SOIL ON PAVED SURFACE SHALL HAVE SAND AND OR ROCK
SCREENING UNDERNEATH AREA.
14. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR AMENDMENTS TO PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL AREAS FOR
STAGING PURPOSE. SUCH AREAS WILL BE STABILIZED.
15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BEGIN WORK THAT CANNOT BE STABILIZED BY THE END OF
THE WORK DAY AND SHALL NOT LEAVE ANY STORM DRAINAGE PIPES OPEN OVERNIGHT.
PIPES MUST BE CLOSED AND PROTECTED BY THE END OF THE WORK DAY.
16. ALL EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SERVICED PRIOR TO WORK COMMENCING EACH
DAY. EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO PREVENT FUEL, OIL, AND LUBRICANT SPILLS
IN THE VICINITY OF A STREAM.
17. PERMANENT VEGETATION SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONJUNCTION WITH TEMPORARY SEEDING
IF CONSTRUCTION OCCURS DURING THE SPECIFIED SEASON IN THE VEGETATION PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOT, PERMANENT VEGETATION SHALL BE PLANTED DURING THE
SPECIFIED SEASON.
18. CONTRACTOR IS TO USE NO. 57 STONE WHERE STONE IS REFERENCED FOR ALL
SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL DETAILS.
19. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES/EXITS MAY BE
REQUIRED BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS.
20. INLET PROTECTION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL PHASES OF THE PROJECT AND UNTIL THE
DISTURBED AREA IS FULLY STABILIZED.
THE FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE IS FURNISHED AS A GENERAL GUIDE FOR
PREPARATION OF A SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION EVENTS. ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, AND
MODIFICATIONS SHOULD BE MADE AS APPROPRIATE.
PHASE 1:
1. CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN GRADING/EROSION CONTROL PLAN APPROVAL FROM NCDENR.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SET UP AN ON -SITE PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE ON -SITE
WITH NCDENR EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR TO DISCUSS EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
FAILURE TO SCHEDULE SUCH CONFERENCE 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBING
ACTIVITY IS A VIOLATION AND IS SUBJECT TO FINE.
3. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN ALL EXISTING EROSION CONTROL FEATURES AND INSTALL SILT
FENCE, INLET PROTECTION, SEDIMENT BASINS, DIVERSION DITCHES, TREE PROTECTION, AND
OTHER MEASURES AS SHOW ON PLANS, CLEARING ONLY AS NECESSARY TO INSTALL THESE
DEVICES.
4. SCHEDULE AN ON -SITE INSPECTION BY NCDENR INSPECTOR. WHEN APPROVED, CLEARING
AND GRUBBING MAY BEGIN.
5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DILIGENTLY AND CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL
DEVICES AND STRUCTURES.
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BEGIN WORK THAT CANNOT BE STABILIZED BY THE END OF
THE WORK DAY.
7. ALL EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SERVICED PRIOR TO WORK COMMENCING EACH
DAY. EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO PREVENT FUEL, OIL, AND LUBRICANT SPILLS IN
THE VICINITY OF A STREAM.
8. FOR PHASED EROSION CONTROL PLANS, CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET WITH EROSION CONTROL
INSPECTOR PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH EACH PHASE OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
PHASE 2:
1. BEGIN EARTHWORK/GRADING ACTIVITIES. BEGIN GRADING OF FILL SLOPES. MAINTAIN
AND VERTICALLY ADJUST ALL ROCK CHECK DAMS, INLET PROTECTION DEVICES, DITCHES,
AND SILT FENCE THROUGHOUT GRADING ACTIVITIES TO MAINTAIN DRAINAGE PATTERNS.
2. AS EARTHWORK ALLOWS, BEGIN INSTALLING STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND
PROPOSED DITCHES. AS STORM DRAINAGE IS INSTALLED, CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE
INLET PROTECTION ON ALL STORM STRUCTURES AND REMOVE INLET PROTECTION WHERE
EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE 15 REMOVED. NO PIPES SHALL BE LEFT EXPOSED AT THE
CLOSE OF EACH DAY.
3. DILIGENTLY AND CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND
STRUCTURES TO MINIMIZE EROSION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN CLOSE
CONTACT WITH THE INSPECTOR SO THAT PERIODIC INSPECTIONS CAN BE PERFORMED AT
APPROPRIATE STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION.
4. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES, INSTALL PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
SUCH AS RIP RAP APRONS, VELOCITY DISSIPATORS, CHANNEL LINERS, GRAVEL BASE
COURSE, ETC.
5. GRADED SLOPES AND FILLS ARE TO BE PLANTED OR PROVIDED WITH PROTECTIVE
COVER SUFFICIENT TO RESTRAIN EROSION WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE
COMPLETION OF ANY PHASE OF GRADING. ALL AREAS UPON WHICH NO FURTHER LAND
DISTURBING ACTIVITY WILL BE UNDERTAKEN ARE TO BE PLANTED OR PROVIDED WITH
PROTECTIVE COVER WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS.
6. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
N.C. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL, U.S. DEPT. OF
AGRICULTURE, CITY OF CONCORD EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE, AND THE PINEVILLE
LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MANUAL.
PHASE 3:
1. AS AREAS ARE BROUGHT TO FINISHED GRADE, CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL FINAL
GRASSING AND STABILIZE ALL SLOPES PER THE EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR PRIOR TO
REMOVAL OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
3. NO DEVICE SHALL BE REMOVED UNTIL SITE IS STABILIZED.
4. DEVICE SHALL BE REMOVED UPON STABILIZATION, NO SILT FENCE OR INLET PROTECTION
SHALL BE LEFT ON PROJECT AFTER PROJECT CLOSE OUT.
GROUND STABILIZATION
1) SOIL STABILIZATION SHALL BE ACHIEVED ON ANY AREA OF A SITE WHERE LAND -DISTURBING
ACTIVITIES HAVE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE:
i) ALL PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES, PERIMETER SLOPES AND AU SLOPES
STEEPER THAN 3 HORIZONTAL TO 1 VERTICAL (3:1) SHALL BE PROVIDED TEMPORARY OR
PERMANENT STABILIZATION WITH GROUND COVER AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE BUT IN ANY
EVENT WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE LAST LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY.
H) ALL OTHER DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT
STABILIZATION WITH GROUND COVER AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE BUT IN ANY EVENT WITHIN 14
CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE LAST LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY.
2) CONDITIONS - IN MEETING THE STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS ABOVE, THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS OR EXEMPTIONS SHALL APPLY:
i) EXTENSIONS OF TIME MAY BE APPROVED BY THE PERMITTING AUTHORITY BASED ON
WEATHER OR OTHER SITE -SPECIFIC CONDITIONS THAT MAKE COMPLIANCE IMPRACTICABLE.
ii) ALL SLOPES 50' IN LENGTH OR GREATER SHALL APPLY THE GROUND COVER WITHIN 7 DAYS
EXCEPT WHEN THE SLOPE IS FLATTER THAN 4: 1. SLOPES LESS THAN 50' SH
ALL APPLY GROUND
COVER WITHIN 14 DAYS EXCEPT WHEN SLOPES ARE STEEPER THAN 3: 1, THE
7 DAY -REQUIREMENT APPLIES.
iii) ANY SLOPED AREA FLATTER THAN 4: 1 SHALL BE EXEMPT FROM THE 7-DAY GROUND
COVER REQUIREMENT.
iv) SLOPES 10' OR LESS IN LENGTH SHALL BE EXEMPT FROM THE 7-DAY GROUND COVER
REQUIREMENT EXCEPT WHEN THE SLOPE IS STEEPER THAN 2: 1.
v) ALTHOUGH STABILIZATION IS USUALLY SPECIFIED AS GROUND COVER, OTHER METHODS,
SUCH AS CHEMICAL STABILIZATION, MAY BE ALLOWED ON A CASE -BY -CASE BASIS.
vi) FOR PORTIONS OF PROJECTS WITHIN THE SEDIMENT CONTROL COMMISSION -DEFINED
"HIGH QUALITY WATER ZONE" (15A NCAC 04A. 0105) , STABILIZATION WITH GROUND COVER
SHALL BE ACHIEVED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE BUT IN ANY EVENT ON ALL AREAS OF THE
SITE WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE LAST LAND DISTURBING ACT.
vii) PORTIONS OF A SITE THAT ARE LOWER IN ELEVATION THAN ADJACENT DISCHARGE
LOCATIONS AND ARE NOT EXPECTED TO DISCHARGE DURING CONSTRUCTION MAY BE EXEMPT
FROM THE TEMPORARY GROUND COVER REQUIREMENTS IF IDENTIFIED ON THE APPROVED
E&SC PLAN OR ADDED BY THE PERMITTING AUTHORITY.
J
0�/
LL
Z
0 W
U�__
Z0
'0 Z
W
0�/
Of
W
Y 0
L Q 0
L
U3�oz
W LZ Q O
w a L.L
��// w O
I oO
J�o_�
U C)
0
0
Z
0
SHEET NUMBER U
C-9.1

PART III
5ELF-1NSPECTIDN, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING
SECTION A: SELF -INSPECTION
Self -inspections are required during normal business hours in accordance with the table
below. when adverse weather or site conditions would cause the safety of the inspection
personnel to be in jeopardy, the inspection may be delayed until the next business day on
which it is safe to perform the inspection. In addition, when a storm event of equal to or
greater than 1.0 inch occurs outside of normal business hours, the self -inspection shall be
performed upon the commencement of the next business day. Any time when inspections
were delayed shall be noted in the Inspection Record.
Frequency
Inspect (during normal
Inspection records must include:
basis ness hou rs)
IEy Rain gauge Daily
Daily rainfall amounts.
maintained in
If no daily rain gauge observations are made during weekend or
good working
holiday periods, and no Individual -day rainfall information is
order
available, record the cumulative rain measurement For those un
attended days (one this will determine if a site inspection is
needed), nays nn which no rainfall occurred shall be recorded as
"zero-" The permittee may use another ram -monitoring device
approved by the Division.
_
G0 Eg.sc At least once per
1. Identification of the measures inspected,
: measures 7 calendar days
2. Date and time oft he inspection,
and within 24
3. Name of the person pe. rforming the ins pertion,
hours of a raln
4. Indication of whether the measures were operating
event Z 1-0 Inch In
property,
24 hours
S. DeSc riptkln of maintenance needs for the measure,
5. De. riptiun, evidence and date of corrective actions taken.
[31 sturrnwater
At least once per
1. Identification of the discharge outfalls Inspected,
discharge
7 calendar days
2. Date and time oft he Inspectlon,
ou[faHis (5DC•5l
and within 24
3. Name of the person performing the trnpection,
hours of a rain
4. Evidence of dndlcato rs of stormwater pollution such as ail
event a 1.0 inch In
sheen, floating or suspended solids or discoloration,
24 hours
5. Indication of visible sediment leaving the site,
5. DescA Wn, evidence and date of cnnec thre actions taken.
(4) Perimeter of At least once per
if vlslble sedimentation is found outside slte limits, then a record
site 7 calendar days
of the Fallowing shall be made:
and whhln 74
1- Actions taken to clean up or stabl dize the sediment that has left
hours of a rain
the site limits,
event 11.0 inch in
2. Description, evidence, and date of corrective acdons taken, and
24 hours
3, An explanation as to the actions taken to control future
releases.
is streams or
At least once per
if the stream or wetland has increased visible and knentatar. or a
wetlands ansite
7 calendar days
stream hag visible increased turbid lty from the construction
or ofhite
and withln 24
activity, then a record of the following shall be made:
(where
hours of a rain
1- Descripdon, evidence and date of corrective actions taken, and
accessibiel
event? 1,01nch In
2. Records of the req ulred reports to the appropriate Division
24 hours
Regional Dfnce per Part III, Section C, Item (2Ila) of this permit_.
[5j Ground After each phase
L The phase of grading II nstallation of porimeter E&sC
stabilization of grading
measures, clearing and grubbing, installation GF storm
measures
drainage facllltes, comp letloo of all larr"isturbing
activity, constructlon or redevelop meet, permanent
ground cover).
2. DocumenraHnn that the required ground stabilization
measures have been provided with In the required
timeframe or an assurance that they will be provided as
soon as passible.
NOTE: The rain inspection resets the required 7 calendar day inspection requirement -
PART III
SELF -INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING
SECTION B. RECORDKEEPING
1. E&SC Plan Documentation
The approved E&SC plan as well as any approved deviation shall be kept an the site. The
approved E&SC plan must be kept up-to-date throughout the coverage under this permit.
The following items pertaining to the E&SC plan shall be kept on site and available for
inspection at all times during normal business hours.
Item to mcument
Documentation Requirements
• (a) Each E&SC measure has been installed
Initial and date each E&SC measure on a copy
and does not Agnifica nt[v devi ate from the
of the approved E&SC plan or complete, date
local lons, dimensions and relative elev®tions
and sign an inspection report that lists each
shown on the approved E&SC plan.
E&SC measure shown on the approved F&SC
plan. This documentation Is required upon the
1nit lal Insta€1ation of the E&SC measures or if
the E&SC measures are modified after initial
Installation.
Initial and date a Dopyof the approved E&SC
(b) A phase of grading has been completed.
plan or complete, date and sign an inspect lon
report to Indicate completion of the
construction phase.
(c) Ground cover is located and installed
Inhial and date a copy of the approved E&SC
in accordance with the approved E&SC
plan orcomplete, date and sign an inspection
plan.
report to Indicate cam pliance with approved
ground covers pecdlcations-
(d) The maintenance and repair
Complete, date and sign an inspection report.
requirements for all E&SC measures
have been performed-
(e) Corrective actions have been taken
Initial and date a copy of the approved E&SC
to E&SC measures.
plan or complete, date and sign an inspection
re port to Indicate the completion of the
corrective action.
2. Additional Documentation to be Kept an Site
In addition to the E&SC plan documents above, the following items shall be kept on the
site and available for inspectors at all times during normal business hours, unless the
Division provides a site -specific exemption based on unique site conditions that make
this requirement not practical:
(a) This General Permit as well as the Certificate of Coverage, after it is received.
(b) Records of inspections made during the previous twelve months. The permittee shall
record the required observations on the Inspection Record Form provided by the
Division or a similar inspection form that includes all the required elements. Use of
electronically -available records in lieu of the required paper copies will be allowed if
shown to provide equal access and utility as the hard -copy records.
3. Documentation to be Retained for Three Years
All data used to complete the a-NOI and all inspection records shall be maintained for a period
of three years after project completion and made available upon request. [40 CFR 122.41]
PART II, SECTION G, ITEM (4)
DRAW DOWN OF SEDIMENT BASINS FOR MAINTENANCE OR CLOSE OUT
Sediment basins and traps that receive runoff from drainage areas of one acre or more shall use outlet structures that withdraw water from the surface when these devices need to be drawn down
far maintenance or close out unless this is infeasible. The circumstances in which it is not feasible to withdraw water from the surface shall be rare (far example, times with extended cold weather).
Non -surface withdrawals from sediment basins shall be allowed only when all of the following criteria have been met:
(a) The E&SC plan authority has been provided with documentation of the non -surface withdrawal and the specific time periods or conditions in which it will occur. The non -surface withdrawal
shall not commence until the E&SC plan authority Etas approved these items,
(b) The non -surface withdrawal has been reported as an anticipated bypass in accordance with Part III, Section C, Item (2)(c) and (d) of this permit,
(c) Dewatering discharges are treated with controls to minimise discharges of pollutants from stormwater that is removed from the sediment basin. Examples of appropriate controls include
properly sited, designed and maintained dewatering tanks, weir tanks, and filtration systems,
(d) Vegetated, upland areas of the sites or a properly designed stone pad is used to the extent feasible at the outlet of the dewatering treatment devices described in Item (c) above,
(e) Velocity dissipation devices such as check dams, sediment traps, and riprap are provided at the discharge paints of all dewatering devices, and
(f) Sediment removed from the dewatering treatment devices described in Item (c) above is disposed of in a manner that does not cause deposition of sediment into waters of the United States.
PART III
SELF -INSPECTION, RE CORD KEEPING AND REPORTING
SECTION C- REPORTING
1. Occurrences that Must be Reported
Permittees shall report the following occurrences:
(a) Visible sediment deposition in a stream or wetland.
(b) Oil spills if:
is They are 25 gallons or more,
is They are less than 25 gallons but cannot be cleaned up within 24 hours,
They cause sheen on surface waters (regardless of volume), or
They are within 100 feet of surface waters (regardless of volume).
(c) Releases of hazardous substances in excess of reportable quantities under Section 311
of the Clean Water Act (Ref: 40 CFR 110.3 and 40 CFR 117.3) or Section 102 of CERCLA
(Ref: 40 CFR 302.4) or G.S. 143-215,8&
(d) Anticipated bypasses and unanticipated bypasses.
(e) Noncompliance with the conditions of this permit that may endanger health or the
environment,
2. Reporting Tim eframes and Other Requirements
After a permittee becomes aware of an occurrence that must be reported, he shall contact
the appropriate Division regional office within the timeframes and in accordance with the
other requirements listed below. Occurrences outside normal business hours may also be
reported to the Department's Environmental Emergency Center personnel at (800)
858-0368.
Occurrence
ReportingTimeframes (After Discovery) and Other Requirements
(a) Visible sediment
a Within 24 hours, an oral or electronic notification.
deposition in a
■ WAWn 7 calendar days, a report thatccntaIns a descripttanof the
stream or wetland
sediment and actions taken to address the cause of the deposition.
❑Mslon staff may waive the requirement for a written report on a
case-hy-case basis,
a If the stream 4, named on the NC 303fds l;stas impaired for sediment -
related causes, the permlttee may be required to perform additional
monitoring, inspections or ap pay more stringent practices if staff
determine that additional requirements are needed to assure cam pliance
with the federal or state impaired -waters conditions.
(b) oil spills and
is Within 24 hours, an oral or electronic notification. The notification
release of
shaft include Information about the date, time, nature, volume and
hazardous
location of the spill cr release -
substances per Item
1(b)-(cl above
(c) Anticipated
a A nworrat feast: ten days before the date of the hyposs, if poss7bfe.
bypasses [40CFR
The report shall include an evaluation of the anticipated quality and
122.41(m)(3)]
effect of the bypass.
(d) Unanticipated
a Within 24 hours, an oral or electronic notification.
bypasses (40 CFR
a Withirr 7 calentfarddys, a report that includes an evaluation of the
122,41(m)(3))
qua Illy and effect ofthe bypass.
(ej Noncompliance
a Within 24 hours, an oral Or electronic notification.
with the conditions
a Within 7 calendar days, a report that contains a description of the
of this permit that
noncompliance, and its causes; the period of noncompliance,
may endanger
including exact dates and times, and if the noncompliance has riot
health or the
been corrected, the anticipated time noncompliance is expected to
environmem[4D
continue; and steps taken or plan nedto reduce, ell minate, and
CFR 122.41(I)(7)]
prevent reacc urrenc e of the noncompliance- [40 CFR 122-41(I)(6)-
a 0ivlslon staff may waive the req u creme rit for a written report on a
case -by -case basis.
* NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
I NCGOI SELF -INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING I EFFECTIVE: 04/01/19I
Y
LU
Of
Y
Q
J
U
J
O�/
LL
Z
O
U
Z
O
U)
O�/
LL
w
w
LU
�ry
V
w
H
O
Z
0
�O
O z
00
w C
Q
a LL
w 0
LU
CL
0
z
0
11
SHEET NUMBER
C-9.2

GROUND STABILIZATION AND MATERIALS HANDLING PRACTICES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
THE NCGOI CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT
Implementing the details and specifications on this plan sheet will result in the construction
activity being considered compliant with the Ground Stabilization and Materials Handling
sections of the NCGO1 Construction General Permit (Sections E and F, respectively). The
permittee shall comply with the Erosion and Sediment Control plan approved by the
delegated authority having jurisdictlon. All details and specifications shown on this sheet
may not apply depending on site conditions and the delegated authority havingjurisdiction.
Required Ground Stabilization Timeframes
Stabilize within this
Site Area Description
many calendar
Tlmefraone variations
days after ceasing
land disturbance
(a) Perimeter dikes,
swales, ditches, and
7
None
perimeter slopes
(b) High Quality Water
7
None
(HQW) Zones
(c) Slopes steeper than
If slopes are 10' or less in length and are
3:1
7
not steeper than 2:1,14 days are
allowed
-7 days for slopes greater than 50' in
length and with slopes steeper than 4.1
-7 days for perimeter dikes, swales,
(d) Slopes 3J W 4:1
14
ditches, perimeter slopes and HQW
Zones
-10 days for Falls Lake Watershed
-7 days for perimeter dikes, swales,
(e) Areas with slopes
ditches, perimeter slopes and HQW Zones
flatter than 4:1
14
-10 days for Fails Lake Watershed unless
there is zero slope
Note: After the permanent cessation of construction activities, any areas with temporary
ground stabilization shall be converted to permanent ground stabilization as soon as
practicable but in no case longer than 90 calendar days after the last land dlsturbing
activity. Temporary ground stabilization shall be maintained in a manner to render the
surface stable against accelerated erosion until permanent ground stabilization is achieved.
GROUND STABILIZATION SPECIFICATION
Stabilize the ground sufficiently so that rain will not dislodge the soil. Use one of the
techniques in the table below:
Temporary Stabikzation
Permanent Stab3lmtion
• Temporary grass seed covered with straw or
• Permanent grass seed covered with straw or
other mulches and tackifiers
other mulches and tackifiers
• Hydroseeding
■ Geotextile fabrics such as permanent soil
• Rolled erosion control products with or
reinforcement matting
without temporary grass seed
• Hydroseeding
• Appro p riately a pp I ed straw or other mulch
• Shrubs or other permanent plantings covered
• Plastic sheeting
with mulch
• Uniform and evenly distributed ground cover
sufficient to restrain erosion
• Structural methods such as concrete, asphalt or
retaining walls
• Rolled erosion control product-, with grass seed
1. Select flocculants that are appropriate for the soils being exposed during
construction, selecting from the NC p WR List of Approved PA MS/Flocculants.
2. Apply flocculants at or before the inlets to Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
3. Apply flocculants at the concentrations specified in the NC DWR List ofApproved
PAMS/Flocculants and in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
4. Provide pending area for containment of treated Stormwater before discharging
offsite.
5. Store flocculants in leak -proof containers that are kept under storm -resistant cover
or surrounded by secondary containment structures.
EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
1. Maintain vehicles and equipment to prevent discharge of fluids.
2. Provide drip pans under any stored equipment.
3. Identify leaks and repair as soon as feasible, or remove leaking equipment from the
project.
4. Collect all spent fluids, store in separate containers and properly dispose as
hazardous waste (recycle when possible).
5. Remove leaking vehicles and construction equipment from service until the problem
has been corrected.
6. Bring used fuels, lubricants, coolants, hydraulic fluids and other petroleum products
to a recycling or disposal center that handles these materials.
LITTER, BUILDING MATE RIAL AND LAND CLEARING WASTE
1. Never bury or burn waste. Place litter and debris in approved waste containers.
2. Provide a sufficient number and size of waste containers (e.g dumpster, trash
receptacle) an site to contain construction and domestic wastes.
3. Locate waste containers at least 50 feet away from storm drain inlets and surface
waters unless no other alternatives are reasonably available.
4. Locate waste containers on areas that do not receive substantial amounts of runoff
from upland areas and does not drain directly to a storm drain, stream or wetland.
S. Cover waste containers at the end of each workday and before storm events or
provide secondary containment. Repair or replace damaged waste containers.
6. Anchor all lightweight items in waste containers during times of high winds.
7. Empty waste containers as needed to prevent overflow. Clean up immediately if
containers overflow.
8. Dispose waste off site at an approved disposal facility.
9. 0n business days, clean up and dispose of waste in designated waste containers.
PAINT AND OTHER LIQUID WASTE
1. Do not dump paint and other liquid waste into storm drains, streams or wetlands.
2. Locate paint washouts at least 50 feet away from storm drain inlets and surface
waters unless no other alternatives are reasonably available.
3. Contain Ilquid wastes in a controlled area.
4. Containment must be labeled, sized and placed appropriately forthe needs of site.
5. Prevent the discharge of soaps, solvents, detergents and other liquid wastes from
construction sites.
PORTABLE TOILETS
1. Install portable toilets on level ground, at least 50 feet away from storm drains,
streams or wetlands unless there is no alternative reasonably available. If 50 foot
offset is not attainable, provide relocation of portable toilet behind silt fence or place
on a gravel pad and surround with sand bags.
2. Provide staking or anchoring of portable toilets during periods of high winds or in high
foot traffic areas.
3. Monitor portable toilets for leaking and properly dispose of any leaked material.
Utilize a licensed sanitary waste hauler to remove leaking portable toilets and replace
with properly operating unit.
EARTHEN STOCKPILE MANAGEMENT
1. Show stockpile locations on plans. Locate earthen -material stockpile areas at least
50 feet away from storm drain inlets, sediment basins, perimeter sediment controls
and surface waters unless it can be shown no other alternatives are reasonably
available.
2_ Protect stockpile with silt fence installed along toe of slope with a minimum offset of
five feet from the toe of stockpile.
3. Provide stable stone access point when feasible.
4. Stabilize stockpile within the timeframes provided on this sheet and in accordance
with the approved plan and any additional requirements. Soil stabilization is defined
as vegetative, physical or chemical coverage techniques that will restrain accelerated
erasion on disturbed soils for temporary or permanent control needs.
r ` _NORTH CAROLINA
ibdlnvironmental Quality
ONSrTE CONCRETE WASHOUT
STRUCTURE WITH LINER
bill
L
unu Mari
HELQV �A% SIQLRT6Q Sf MAE71IE RAr& M FTC E
CONCRETE WASHOUTS
1. Do not discharge concrete or cement slurry from the site.
2. Dispose of, or recycle settled, hardened concrete residue in accordance with local
and state solid waste regulations and at an approved facility.
3. Manage washout from mortar mixers in accordance with the above item and in
addition place the mixer and associated materials on impervious barrier and within
lot perimeter silt fence.
4. Install temporary concrete washouts per local requirements, where applicable. If an
alternate method or product is to be used, contact your approval authority for
review and approval. If local standard details are not available, use one of the two
types of temporary concrete washouts provided on this detail.
5. Do not use concrete washouts far dewatering or storing defective curb or sidewalk
sections. Stormwater accumulated within the washout may not be pumped into or
discharged to the storm drain system or receiving surface waters. Liquid waste must
be pumped out and removed from project.
6. Locate washouts at least 50 feet from storm drain inlets and surface waters unless it
can be shown that no other alternatives are reasonably available. At a minimum,
install protection of storm drain inlet(s) closest to the washout which could receive
spills or overflow.
7. Locate washouts in an easily accessible area, on level ground and install a stone
entrance pad in front of the washout. Additional controls may be required by the
approving authority.
8. Install at least one sign directing concrete trucks to the washout within the project
limits. Post signage on the washout itself to Identify this location.
9. Remove Ieavings from the washout when at approximately 75% capacity to limit
overflow events. Replace the tarp, sand bags or other temporary structural
components when no longer functional. When utilizing alternative or proprietary
products, follow manufacturer's instructions.
10. At the completion of the concrete work, remove remaining leavings and dispose of
in an approved disposal facility. Fill pit, if applicable, and stabilize any disturbance
caused by removal of washout.
HERBICIDE5, PESTICIDES AND RODENTICIDES
1. Store and apply herbicides, pesticides and rodenticides in accordance with label
restrictions.
2. Store herbicides, pesticides and rodenticides in their original containers with the
label, which lists directions for use, ingredients and first aid steps in case of
accidental poisoning.
3. Do not stare herbicides, pesticides and rodenticides in areas where flooding is
possible or where they may spill or leak into wells, stormwater drains, ground water
or surface water. If a spill occurs, clean area immediately.
4. Do not stockpile these materials a n si te.
HAZARDOUS AND TOXIC WASTE
1. Create designated hazardous waste collection areas on -site.
2. Place hazardous waste containers under cover or in secondary containment.
3. Do not store hazardous chemicals, drums or bagged materials directly on the ground.
NCGO1 GROUND STABILIZATION AND MATERIALS HANDLING I EFFECTIVE: 04/01/191
Y
w
LU
Y
Q
J
U
J
O
Z
O
U
Z
O
U)
O
w
Z
W
�ry
V
w
0
Z
0
Q'
0 0
w Z
00
w C
Q
a LL
w O
Lu
a
C�
0
z
0
11
SHEET NUMBER
C-9.3

r
a
B
_ 9' �A%. WITH WIRE zOti zo zti O 6' MAX.N6WITHOiJT WI ca N
o�a NOTES o�a >
I" PROVIDE TURNING RADIUS SUFFICIENT TO ACCNWODATE LARGE
MIDDLE AND VERTICAL WIRES iMUCN3� Y..
_ SMALL BE 121y GRUGE MIN" �~ � 2" LOCATE CONSTRUCTION YEHL
ENTRANCES TO PROVIDE FOR UTILI]A.TION LLpw ft Wy
RY ALL CONSTRCLES.
3" YNST 8E W1INTAIHED IN A CQHDITI ON %11ICH WILL PPEliFM
nxyFo iRACKINO DR DIRECT FLOW OF M1RID ONTO STREETS. nxyFo¢ MOTES
_ TOP AND 60TTdA 8TFRN0 PERIODIC TOPDRESSING WITH STONE WILL RE NECESSARY. IB WIPE x[gx
SHALL BE 10 GADGE YIN. 21 MA%. / 4. ANY MATERIAL TRACKED ONTO THE ROADWAY M1VSi BE
USE NO. 5 OP NO. 5T STONE FOR SEOIXEHT DIMENSION--
(18" Y'N.� CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY" CCNTRCL S j. IxFFT voxTPaE sToxF
E. LOCATE ORAIEL CDNSTRNCi VON ENTRANCE AT ALL PO LNTS OF
// dNGRI35 AND EPOT UNTIL SITE IS GTASILIIEO" PROVIDE H1THE41AEWA1 ESH OPEN1nGS.aE x1 PE WeaH 2 fE 1 it nin
FPEQUE UT CHECKS OF THE DEVICE AND TIMELY MAINTENANCE. W
In <' // S" NUN REA AND LOCATION OF CONSTAUCTI ON ENTRANCES TO W Wo
BF ....IRBIWI) BY THE END INEEA. L] INSTALL 5 FT. SELF FASTENER ANGLE STEEL z
/ t T" USE CLRGG 'A' STONE OR OTHER DOARSE Afi;fI ELATE ARPRQYEO z4 POST 2 FT. DEEP NIH [ARM. NO
E WERE 1 g W S Ar THE fND[HF.EA. S C / p ATTACH FYROWWE CI OTH TO POSTE HITH WIRE
E + i '4' B• INSTALL CDNSTRI}CT1QN ENiRN7CE$ IN A MAY
T9 PREVENT VEHI GLE$ gTAPLi DP 6THiR ACEFPiA9Li METHODS.
GEOT"TILE FROM RVPASOING CCW3rANCT" FNTRANCF IP"INO FRWFCT STTF" r� Z. 0
Z 11 W SAME P09T8 n Wax LWLN DF .71
FT" F
E NOTES ap z FOR INSTALLATLON REP EEM SECTIONS OF a z z
O n USE GEQTE%TILE A MINI" OF 6EOTE%i ILE ---y o j o GILT FENCE, E%fEOF SCOIXCMI CONTROL 1$ WIPE MESH ¢o V
f STONE A NIH ENI.N OF 12" ON EACH SFOE OF SEDINEW CONTROL STONE w -
TF�T
eD U SPECIAL SEO IM"mT WHTPOL FENCE SECTION. o w
38' IN WIDTH AND FASTEN ADEQUATELY 1 Tt n1P O 4 ~
TO THE PQST3 AND WIRE AS DIRECTED. COMPRCTED FILL } W W O
USE WIRE A MINIMUM OF 32' r r 0~a WATER¢ N w
IN NI DTH AND WITH A NIR IMUN _ BE z ELOw� �' N O a N z
OF 5 LINE WIRES W1TH 12" VERTICAL — j �]"7 eTe d CLASS 'A' BTOxE / �• T 0 T s o
8PACINO. �i, � I Leif v BIN. MIN. DEPTH '� - J /_`
PROVIDE 5' D" 9TE EL POET OF �� -� n[ o '^` a a o
THE SELF -FASTENER ANGLE STEEL a 14 W.R. Ma ¢ 0 � o J
TYPE, n STEEL POST - 2'-0' DEPTH NOTE: PLACE GEDTUTILE FDA DRAINAGE BENEATH STONE E9 2 ft R -
FOR YE%M ICA_ SLICING METHOD NO =0Y
INSTALLATION, GFDTE%TILE SHALL 3
BC A MAXIMUM OR IB" AWE
GROUND- -- a
r = SURFACE" E%TENSION OF DECTE%TILE AND - F
- WIRE INTO TRENCH
° 3 1605.01 i8D7.01 iBDB.01
01
a 3 o 01
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE �� SPECIAL SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE
1 Not to Scale Not to Scale `A Not to Scale
Z
� O
� 0 F
E C Z a
� U
0o 1
aw o� m
y o
OR
NOTES wo J
CLERK SEDIMENT WHEN oNW O
GONTROL 112 FULL AND AS DIRECTED, dy
COIlTIODL uGE NO. 5 OR tt0. 5T STONE
STONE
E A A FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL STONE. x a
L USE CL-S A STONE FOR
J $TRDCTURAL STONE" o
CONSTRUCT TOP OF BERM I
STRUCA MiHIYOY OF ONE F007 U)
STONENRAL BELOW THE SHOULDER OR a 0
ANY DIVERSION POINT. ¢o / 1ui
z 0
�~ 0 z
pi
lim�
I- - 1,"6. W
_ ry „ 11 E
` L]
o L
U
Z
SECTION A -A
iB32.02
Y o
W
4 ROCK INLET SEDIMENT TRAP TYPE B Q o OU
Not to Scale ' ` � LL z
ZL0
w U
W W <
w a LL
w O
QUa�
J
U v�
0
0
E
U
SHEET NUMBER
C-9.4
ti ti
RdI.$.
vv
�p.
Uo vo o�v oU o�v
��,
n ❑
Testa
�>
�'�iW� B .' 0 P 4y1 P8 4 F 4y' F.� R `•,9�y',9�,g �,g �,g
�,� Fyl,��v

PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL INFO
/ � w
> > TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
° SOD— — —LOD— — DISTU RBED AREA / / / OGRA 10C SCIN FEET40
2 /
r 644 PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR /
_ 644 PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR /
SF SF d O
SILT FENCE
FEMA FLOODWAY / ALLEN MILLS HOMEOWNERS z
,3 ASSOCIATION, INC
FEMA 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN PR DOSED 10' GRE NWAY (-L1) / PIN: 4680-05-6643
/ DB: 13656 PG: 323 BACKWATER FOR
TRAPTYPEIANLET SEDIMENT 1\— — / MB: 81 PG: 9 CLARKE CREEK
SS
ROCK INLET SEDIMENT TRAP TYPE B77
L SPECIAL SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE `30£ s M,I.,.._ h MMSS 12" CM; (f1
c V /. g INV.fi15y3$�
p. IS --------\ INV 5Q8.68' ------- - - - - - -
5 TREE PROTECTION FENCEJON�T 84•--- - 1 j ��� 9J
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE / h / _ E-- s°t^ �� \ l t \F� _ — -av— - --'- \ \ \- 3%y,�� k0 O w z
ea Lev: 615.25' jIl/ "C�s.S'� - ` -� \3'�i L5`� 'r ys 19�OAK - -� -f101 /�
k yyy /' yy INV.I(J(A): 606.01 — 0Dl— —.�T QOl_ ——40�`—�� \�--" ��I� ( \ -J
Ipv IN(B):i99.09A01— y �`y - "f�9� �n�
ch /iNV OU 595.5T
0000
612
yft- a o z
s I \ \ 00/ /�� _ + _ 5; 615616�'�___
/v� '617618
1, L�
679
_ _�.__�� \ 67
c _ _-� _ - I".6L7.�307
IN S\ h. \ \ � \� i➢ / /_T_______ F�LO'a
gol—
i �� ry
62, '0`L @ o
MA Zl'�+� — �-62L /- MRSS
`627-- -. ti — —OOI— — —00�� \ -Lj�3 �� - 223-TREE -� _- -TiIM V IN: "62tYB9'
T - L J 6 i - INV IN: 598.99' _ — — ` 625 / 4�
623--- _ _ _wv -OUT. 598.73� ----
_
CID z
��� (oi _-, _--_-624--' /---------------- 626--
•' �!� \ \ / _ cD------- ---- l "Oi / �/ _ — -625/ ------ _-- +� �2
6z5, ---- -- 623 �! ----- ,a- --'------- --- _, P
- z o - 6 E o
---- / --
P'NLJ-- ��628'�22 091E---- -629
---_ _ qy'
54.
------------624-- 629 _ = 6 x -- x�U]
4 _ x_ �1 o
ALLEN MILLS HOMEOWN S \ 1 BACKWATER FOR
ASSOCIATION, INC A 1 CLARKE CREEK / 1 �� - - -- - - -BACKWATER FOR _ _ _ 00 w o
PIN: 4680-05-6643 -- - --- _ _ _ ---' I /- --�- — _ -�' � CLARKE-GR€E4C_
DB: 13656 PG: 323
MB: 81 PG: i = - --� - ( \ _ / \ Y
\ 22.5" TREE - \
_ _ _ _ _ � _ - GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
�_-------- v / 4 i — — _ _ _----- WDbDE9_ --- DRAIN
o 10 20 40
��— __ -- -Q --- _
\ice -------- ------- _ ---- -- -� \�-�\ __
/ �. --_--nor -- - — -------10a_612. IF-
------- - ��OL�
e / -----��f101��
H5� - - - , �LbO�-(1 - - - - F_ F-�614 T _ -
�� i RIM-EkEVr61§48' 615 - — --� m�� -fl0l --�� - - 1,00 PEAR E� I
ffi i INV IPL598 72'� - . ��-r_ FF� �t� _FLIIO_D-Llb1E _
-'00
iL00/'/ � F 6, ��16 _ � -� 6� ss____ F a�.„S
F" 619618- — 0�. +
_ �-� _ — 0 JW
-621 �_ _ oo yz , _ - _ _�..� -aoi --e w Z J
617
4- �OOI— —�OOI— 20, �QOj� �� + _ v _� W
625
f g-�-627--- -�--+19S"r
622
-623- _628
_ -� O
629 -- x� + e • A `_-s19, - 1 'aO- �6 v v
��2--62a__ —max Woo v ,_v ��_ ' s�owooD �a --- ��/ �1� -a - -5 �sTa6 W
3 �i9D j 626- ,-- � i�.,�x�R x OAO x�%� 9 / IINvS �-�'; \rt4K _ -� u
Kt
SPIx� 1 X— .- 10L W
y - '62T�- +� _x`- 6z2 v �:�v� � - --o07 a z z
G WALK OWNERS ASSOCIA INC., A-
6'x ,--62a /+ NORTH CAROLINA NON-PROFIT C ATION s 00' ���
0O + C 0 HAWTHORNE MANAGEMENT P y PROPOSED 10'GREENWAY(--L1) �� 23 —R�4I / �IU Q
,�' + TRP NLS® PIN: 4670-95-1236 W
+ DB: 8440 PG: 294 s
e18" W 0
/ SARAH F. SMITH, UNMARRIED, AND
MB: 50 PG: 55 BARBARA J. FLEETON, UNMARRIED �, + I� O
5 REBAR \ \ 6 \ F 1 . , 620 / LJ 1 LL O
�G PIN: 4680-05-0676 ��R BAR v / eti
DB: 5947 PG: 233 �� Opw� X 1 L
�10 MB: 44 PG: 45 V A A� �� - - 2 _6 -� r W Z 0_ U
RETE MONUMENT PROPOSED 10'GREENWAY(-Y2)07 r� ( a LL
I 62 A W Q
NA08}i2 605,C GRIN \ m 1 1 1 ae N= fi80,136.26' \ \ \ 1 \ /�/ LLI O
E= 1,480,136.26' \ 'BM : - - i �5 Of � D-
LOCAL GROUND \ 1 RUlG1�Rt ENT / LL
N= 605,687.21' \ \ ASPHALT 1 S 0
E- 1, 8 ELEV: 23.19' -
\1 �� RE ��
- PRATAPSI SHANKARROA ATIL DA S. COHLN & \ d z
w CATCH BASIN
° LINDSEY CARRI� RIM ELEV: 622.fi9' WM
& MAN LA JAGANNATH SAI, INV OUT: 615.84' 0
USBAND AND WIFE HUSBAND ND WI \ 15" RCP o
E J PIN: 4670- -9961
PIN: 4680-05-090( SHEET NUMBER
/ DB: 10501 PG: DB: 14687 P 116
48 6z4
- - MB: 50 PG: 55 MB: 50 PG: \ 4 REBAR C-9.5

PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL INFO
> >
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
—LOD— — —LOD— — —
DISTURBED AREA
644
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
644
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
SF SF
SILT FENCE
— — — — —
FEMA FLOODWAY
FEMA 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN
ROCK PIPE INLET SEDIMENT
TRAP TYPE A
ROCK INLET SEDIMENT TRAP TYPE B
SPECIAL SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
A�. // / / \
iI IHS$
` J RIM EI/EU. g1 H.8:,
INvhuT:�sIN 7.g'�
22" /� �� •���� ��� t'
9 p ALLEN MILLS HOMEOWNERS T TREE
� �q ASSOCIATION, INC GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
SEW. R/W � Tj PIN: 4680-05-6643
k,. 109 C� DB: 13656 PG: 323 /'vim T m
B: 63 PG: 205 MB: 81 PG: 06
�c�'CPP. AA : SACC
�F v
i614�24-
—� O
615-
mEE18,
�_� PROPOSED 10'GREENWAY(-L1) TREE
/
PVC
i&PYSTOPHEi2�J� 6R0� p /
& HOLLY GR S73 .A r -6/ A A \ tv / �/ / iF a v. 1a" (
o HUSBAND & WI
PIN: 4670-95-9 b4 TREE
E DB: 5874 PG: 1�2
MB: 44 PG: 4
o f-1-L___ v� i •
-TREE
- - - - - - - - -
/ \ L26 - i 66 / A% / RIM ELEV: 616.96' W
-� TIE INV IN: 597.98' a
4 REBAR \ r / \' \-T� `\ \ + F _ SF 0 /�_-�j �\ _ / O� INV OUT: 597.92'
Y r / \
'EMM M ELLIOTT III ` I /� - - -F� _ /--ss- Sr�� — Gam' /�� i
/ jL� / / �
AND ALERIE ELLIOTT, � �� / - 616 �F -ss�n�
H SBAND & WIFE01
T PI 4670-95-9431
B: 6280 PG: 81 / /v 23" TREE 0�
MB: 44 PG: 45 TREE
REE
ySo 61_7—
/7)` / MHS1i LGp_ i?- _
/ '� / RIM ELEV: 617.68' ro��l �/ / / /-
/ / .�S,00 C,� INV IN(A): 597.88' 18" • 0 U
INV IN(B): 609.33' `�� • / J / / /� / �620� TREE -679- is
L,
y W 0) �j INV IN(C): INACCESSIBLE DUE TO LADDER � ---- r-/ / -��/ 620 • F
/ r W d INV OUT: 597.88' / / // / _ / ✓ ti M S �} FO a
/ O b M ELEV: 618.28' ��
jj !7 NV IN: ' Z Z
"� �On� ti0//�� • INV OUT:
597.597.88'
4 REBAR
ALLEN MILLS HOMEOWNERS �� E SHEET C-9'�,vv` \ w o
1a" / / ASSOCIATION. INC ��` �\ $TA', 124+00, SE „ V A `1v \\ VA o N
EE
r i �- MHss PIN: 4680-05-6643 ATGHL�NE 1 �N o�
yo �WCIODEo ��a M o / iii� Q� o
�� ELEV go9.aa'DB: 13656 PG: 323\I 1�/ Imo'//ol Y�
wrNiv T�Ssia8, MB: 81 PG: 0�
-----\ _
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET rr
_ _ 5 \ \ \ T 1 I I p \ ,I / J
0 TO 20 40'�^� 1 I)/III
v/
_ - - -- \_n_,_
Moro? � v � � � I / I
EAS ,� v '\ ��/I V I I
SANITARY SE3258 PG:268 _ /` �� / r I/ II ( III
v / Ur /
_ss-- 6 605 30 CT 2. BB'� WSACC \ O \ I Z
6�Z,8Z M.95 ♦ TRA DV�ER: o 0
-__------ U Z
�T \ ; '�� /I j Q
Z J 0
-109- �10� - \ \ \ �`-19' SANITARK EASEMR3Ji
-'s / / �j c RIOT `-----=--------- -- js -- \s �� �\ M\�\� , JTRAM..
1 � �. < �.'- F �f70 �r \ \ s\ \ \\ \ \< DB: /3258 P : 268
,00 es v i Y�/ % I
/--�F —E�R� - �POPOS 10'GREENWAY(-L1) vv�� ��_ - , �j�� el ' U)
01
--\ 77
/
- TREE---61q'REE�—_ U\�\\\ \ �� ( y \1` OD/ //� ` 1 \ \ ui
-
/ \ \ \ \ 1 k J \ CJ
, \ ' -
Fqe _ o oDiI
\\ \
� HIGFiL EEK COMMUNIT ^.
ASSOCIATION, 14VC.\T,
�I PIN: 46-05-(�176 0v i v v D� v �� ` �� h - LJJ
2 v �� a / 4�� LLj 0
08: 675 PG: 76 o / v /- / / / < iz� /
/ IWOODE� `
r B: 46 G: 109/
\ V A V A \Cp A vv TT T / / . 2) firy / 1 LE Z
RIP -RAP rR=
�0
RIM ELEV: w W D-'
INV .�8 1' / \� Q
�`a „ I.
LULL
L�WL/ o- 0
'PUBLIC DR GE EASEAYENT AS SH WIN ON
C • / `
F TfjP NLS TR
N10 6 PG: 109 J
UN TO ACCURATELY PLOT r 1 U
boy .� 24" o
\ O
SHEET NUMBER
AT ,i �/ RIP-R F'� C-9•6

+6 n,, +�+�` OS E i
�/ �xJt \7` -_ �\ �\ -SANI Y-SEWER fA 55 LECT
ACT 1 268 Ru, ELEV: 618.90' MANHOLE TO COL
32 PG'. OPEN
ACC RY FOR tNaTEonTA
__ TRIBUTA
HIGHLAND CREEK CNITY ,T"� "z�� LOD= ar �� _ _ 1 CLARKE CREEK
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ASSOCIATI06Y, INC
0 10 20 40 PIN: 4680404 1631
DB: 5f 2 PG: ,257� �a
�B 5 PG/ 48/�pp�/
ALLEN MILLS HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC 19'
LLOD'� �•��- --� 615- ��i+J --_ �, l \ \\TREE
PIN: 4680-05-6643 ` \
DB: 13656 PG: 323`��
MB: 81 PG: 06iPO` �� v v`�v v \ zG"
%' \��\`� \�\ \ \ TREE
MHss ���� Ei % F ���Y� j --�� _
RIM ELEV: 609.73 / / / i j 620 - - - -_ C \ ' `� C \�
IN:
597.4� ,CC/ ' �i-�� �. ���TREE\ - \\�\(O�
�p0� �Z( � 23EE�
z 7 f _
NV OOT'. A"J�
597lL T \ �\
i v z s'v �'ii //i '�PRPPOSED-I "GREENWAYFL1
�6 5.o�A�A- <�
60
625--"- - ---- �� A
PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL INFO
> >
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
---LOD— — —LOD— — —
DISTURBED AREA
644
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
644
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
SF SF
SILT FENCE
— — — — —
FEMA FLOODWAY
FEMA 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN
ROCK PIPE INLET SEDIMENT
TRAP PEA
ROCK INLET SEDIMENT TRAP TYPE B
zzSPECIAL
SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
JAMES JACKSON AND WIFE,
DEBBIE JACKSON
viiv viv vv PIN: 4680-04-5483
ALEXANDER R. FREEMAN �� v
DB: 7307 PG: 115 AMY
XRt� MB: 45 PG: 48 HUSBAND & WISE
/v/�
DB: 9647 PG: 79
` v
MB: 45PG: 48
09 / ALEXANDER ESCOBAR AND
WIFE, PAMELA C. ESCOBAR
/ JOS E. KIRKWOOD AND \ PDB: 15279 PG:5137 \ l ON RegA/ SC �� \_\�� \
CYNTHIA A. KIRKWOOD MB: 45 PG: 48 G W ^ �y��- ���.�-
PIN: 4680-04-4530
DB: 13004 PG: 198
MB: 45 PG: 48
MHSS
RIM ELEV., 614.67'
INV IN: 596.85'
INV OUT: 596.81'
MHSS
0�
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
7 \ RIM ELEV: 614.43' \ ` �/ �/ i� d� / / E� / / l INV IN: 596.70'
INV OUi: 596.53' \\\�jyi� /�
HSS \ "p3
M
Cl
��� INV OUT-
- _ _ PROPOSED 10' GREENWAY (-L1)
� �- � e7 � � �� � � �--"---� � -�,�, � i sos� L. POINDEXTER AND WIFE,
E. POINDEXTER
y - \ _ _ / � _ ;,- ' / /�/ / PIG& 4680-13-0757
\ \ �l /_ / /
��— • A = 5�i c B: 6439 PG: 43
°E€ _�� �r��l-- — �J / _ _L0D- �' � .� �� 612 % �ii iiii '� MB: '42 PG: 110
'604�OIl5.�6pBpl
a610
.- � % ANDREW JOHN HUBREGSEN AND
620� - - e? ' -' / ``lSPOUSE, ANGELA SULLIVAN LEIS
PIN: 4680-13-0757
DB: 15806 PG: 137
RI 630- _ _ - - \_ �� �t�E MB: 42 PG: 110
0-
630-
KEVIN CHARLES
_, ----_ _ --- ="S4IC-kND=Wff�S� McDONALD & WIFE,
---_ 640=---- W. RICHARD HUFF
MAN & ii4 .67• ��� ��- —_ fV5ERKII[�IS-T�ICi= j� CAROL JONELLE
WIFE, RUTH S. HUFFMAN �� � 6�5 - �� _ —= -�
�iaEe,�=--��-----_--- _ — 9FGABARF��CT�N-NAY- McDONALD
/ PIN: 6345 P4-6097 / 4 REBAR `6A� sa ` \�\ _ == _ _ = _ --_- =-�11 -1 '4164 PIN: 4680-03-9797
/ DB: , 45 G- 8 MONICA LYNETTE P7EIFFER ___--_---\-- ----Y /
MB: 45 PG: 48 PIN: 4680-04-7010 4 R ARC_T�-�1a PG: 1 DB: 6111 PG: 139
/ DB: 10424 PG: 292 --- KIMBER DORCE,,BENN, MB: 42 PG: 110 \
MB: 45 PG: 48 OSSAMA TFEIL & AN MARRIED W AN
/ SP SE, ELHAM R IEl P : 4680-03-9727 \
N.
4680-03-792 ��a, DB: 16066 PG: 46
JJJ bB: 16- PG: 210 yJ MB: 42 PG: 110 \
MB: 45 PG: 48
J
L�
1
Z
0 Z
Z J
0 a
Of
Lu
k
z
Y 0
Lu ly-
LLI OQ °zV5LLuJ
a L.L
�00-0OL0
J � �
U C)
0
0
0
SHEET NUMBER
C-9.7

w
MHSS
NORTH a
RIM ELEV: .57' '
INV IN: . 596.'
INV OUT: 59fi.41'
^\ \
- - _- --GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
r_--- /
/
// I / \ � 0 10 20 40
g
/
aeE� i/ a z
_ _ �� / / vv �_
�� i I�1 PROPOSED 10' GREENWAY (-L1) REE RIM ELEV. .ems vv o v` vvv
�ee.��\�= �v� - ---- - �- INV I598.37.
_ � _-----r---_------� -= - -`_- - _�_ INV OUT
596.37 is
w-
--1�J�= L-,- �a _ C°cam 6\s <_ �q v J _ _ sos\ - J
S F`
0 o CO+D-_\SF \\ \ OQ� — —LOD E INPlN596.106� '_ i ^� \ \ a o
Fss C F INV OU Tom: 598. - `~ - i J\\ \ CV\ \ ` \ \ \1\ Z
�G v
rw =�6,s. -_ - __ — —
Z _rOI-$Q�yc - - --� - — _ -_�—� x _ - _ c , __ _ - {\is-_ i1!- /�� _ \\`'o \ \ p \ \ �I I I \
_Loe= 6� 61o11+ I o ~
_ _ _ __ __wi= —— i �,� v'i I III �� y_r i, o
Q _625 — _ _ _ - 625� ` - �� y _ i- �f '' �1 x '•- �' z
MATCHLINE STA: 142+00, SEE BELOW �\ o
_----630- _ __ _ _-�615�
s
o
4RBAR ---(70.02)����0'=3�K - _x�x / /� ) Y
U )y 143.79'
01NE (NORTH OF �� � -i \\ �_� �- --� -- \ _ _ — --- i ��- - i x�% / \ o
NOLAN W WALKER AN KYLE MILLER AND -SPOUSE, �1 BEN dP,MTN�II,A�($vtV1S�JR= - - 615�,M-YR4N'C.XUM AiVD�� JE�AMIAH� GI�S LEE ANN �� a
_ WIFE, APRIL D WALKER AMANDA MILLER V vWIFE,vTAMEKA-V9NY T� FO&f45��_ _�ZIiAILKt-AND WEED-Y uc � � _ � � �-GIBBS,HUSBAND AND WIFE
_ PIN: 4680-13-1797 PIN: 4680-13-2766 v v �x�t�:x 7 E� ��J1� - f, TEt`1-ivt-HAL1EA--- --- fN:-4_6� 1 ---� / PIN: 4680-13-5765
DB: 13663 PG: 136 DB: 16141 PG: 251 �d1¢`-_��m -r�7��-- 620 �- 136 egg--- DB: 9509 PG: 251 y
�('� -PCAN iAR
MB: 42 PG: 110 MB: 42 PG: 110 MB: hci DLO �`-D&13 ���4,-4---_ -4 pG� T10 MB: 42 PG: 110 •� o
� - -------------- I
INING WALL -- — z
-6z5- i
�r--
CID z
�I U o
�4 of
C Fo a
� O
TREE
y -- / -- TREE HIGHLAND CREEK COMMUNITY w
��,----� ---� - __-= a----- ASSOCIATION. INC
r - _ PIN: 4680-13-8590 z Y o
DB: 4980 PG: 228
� - - - - -605 v -W�FI �� MB: 42 PG: 110
6 o /_
_ _--- - --Rr��Ev: en.n l • - - PROPOSED 10'GREENWAY(-L1) acRAPac SCALE w FEET 0
r _
�r
�,�= r - ra^�+o>LEIru�Ri�nTn - - -/ _ _ \ \ \ - ---- - - - -
O
�\ 0 OPEN _/ -- ---
Z Z- - �-
_—
u'+ ----- — ��i
F -`F v F �`v 30' SANITARY SE4�ER� - -
a - - - _ RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENT 0
- �v - �60s- \ o DB: 2580 PG: 239
L605- ------ T-- ----__ OWNER. WSACC
s5C F F� O \\ -SS----
"` - C N— ---n - _ ____ ss---_ys----n----ss-__-43
_-
--
m--------- -n- - _ _ ---- ---- ----n- - ss ,
rr1 ---- g - - _ - -- -_ -- �� - --------n----=s =s , S s�60gs� � ss \7 � � �
g a —_: 0�
_
W Oj=00`1=—�Q1= —'0&7 �61 610-I /�� �IOI �]Ol ------------- ----- `--------__ �p� V
F
-! -TREE I— ---------- ----- - --
o --------- — -----� v ——--ems —�
--- -----� - -- 11 F
saw v �
PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL INFO `vv v_ `I RIP RAP ���� • \ v� F �'= c—�`607 -C� G F F F so' F v W
ET
is OOl— 007� 60yyy9��`\ c1
> > TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH �x� 24. o SOD— — —L00— — DISTU RBED AREA 4 REBAR \ � \ l� \ - �� J/ � � 6�� !S j 608
644 PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR \ -- 870 —---� 6o9C �- / Cju
0 O
644 PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR I - N T. ��- - NS--- \ -- - _ / 61% — -610— �x n/ < � U
3 6 _ LJ�
CONSTRUCTION ENTRA CE#2 �N, - �O `O \� \- �— - I- M N 610 �— i�� — '\k o Z
w N
SF SF SILT FENCE ---- - _to_--- lh - p <° __-_--'�' U H
\
�_�._ - - ' -iCj Z '-=c-=620-620--� ---� --_ \_�--612--- --- �\� w w Q (
FEMA FLOODWAY\----_613_-_-----\------------->=�\-OD' \/ d
_ —00]— v v------------- _ �,� Y LLI LU O
FEMA 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN -`--- —9Q1— — \ -J- d
OOi� — -a \ A - _614 - l_ — _ OOI— v v i -613 a LL
ROCK PIPE INLET SEDIMENT \ /O�\1� ---- `\\\i.6 \ ---- �� �/ 6� //I�''►►
\_ \ \ L \ \-616----\ \ ` \-� \ 61� Q V_
TRAP PEA \\ -/j/ �\ \ \ \ �`•� (T(� nnII `\616 �"/ \ \ J
20' SANITARY SEWER R/W \ / \ \ AkBAR ` - --61, \ --/ �/ / 1 / )
ROCK INLET SEDIMENT TRAP TYPE B AS SHOWN ON MB: 42 PG: 110 / 20 PUBUCTDRAINAGE EASEMEyJT \ \� \'6j& ��� LJ
OWNER: CITY OF CONCORD O I O AS SHOWN ON B: 42\PG: 11tl�FFRF`Y D- CAR WICC`AND_,•�`'�617�� O
SPECIAL SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE \0 � 7 `�SPOIT�E, p NIEL7'�. CARW�LE ��J ---\ \� / / / \
° V �I M PING 46$0,13-459�-��PRO�OStED10' Y-(Y )1 v v A 5 / _ `
o E TREE PROTECTION FENCE I— \ \ DBl 11277 PG: 36--� `NUMENGRt, L�LG- \ �- - \`�`\\-6� / //� - O
MHss \ MB: 42 PG: 110 'pw `4680-13-4562 -a AR - / /-
RIM ELEV.- 626.25' / 1.. L i \ ` `__ /J SHEET NUMBER
INV OUT: 619.19' 6" PVC I V I DB: 1 334 PGi�D3-yy-� V _ ( � v A-- -
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE I - C-9
��� A6ACORN LANE MB: 42 PG:�NO `�` v/ -J A -
6 - - / ��

11
Ct9$�
>
� _,--_
—PIZOP�S€D 10 GREEN��Lj�
01
JI
— -- ✓' —
v i I/� —
�620--�__�
-� `_ 1✓�
JIBV IIIII��
PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL INFO
> >
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
-LOD- - -LOD- - -
DISTURBEDAREA
644
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
644
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
SF SF
SILT FENCE
FEMA FLOODWAY
FEMA 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN
ROCK PIPE INLET SEDIMENT
TRAP TYPE A
ROCK INLET SEDIMENT TRAP TYPE B
SPECIAL SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
/
f
6US 6E, f
6
SS
s
� y
soy_ 1
aoT} -too] — —
_ _ o
—Q'08 ---J�
F F C
I
1
1
gv2
~1
PROPOSED 10' E*K� AY (-Y4 )
YOO�C�
AAA
?¢Zajg
RIP -RAP
C
DRAIN
w—
E�
O
\
poi
p.
—o
0*,, YgP}
F9�q�
�Ti �--
, — -------
—
�
`. R ,60
® TRP Nls
_—_
e,s _
gc��ssF�,�
o (r
100
FLOC
0
z
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
Y
Lu
�
I1
Lu
Y
Q
J
U
J
Z
0
0
F
0
W
Z
Lu�/
Ir.Jn�
V
Z
J
0
IY
0
o C
LL Z
00
w C
o-
Q
a L.L
w 0
OL
a
C�
O
z
O
U
SHEET NUMBER
C-9.9

I
— —LOD— — —LOD = —I�OD y o
—�LOD— _
�� `v 0 >V \� �� �1�1 Av�� /
\ /� ---- so Zlo �I \I 1
I m m {
-b SF I N n0,
o
9 ro mr co¢r \I
F f
7/-PLOD— — —LOD— —LOD �Ir— —LOD �— —LODE— —LOD— ——L9D—_'��LOD—� —L01 — — —LOD— — — 6D——/J—LODL LODLI
v/ l
�l L L vv
� v I v�
I I /1 v), v O
/ m
Lu
----------------`- ��-------- /---------
IT v
IN I
\
JL ---- E--------I---E��A
I�
T l II 11 I V vI/
�\ ` 1 J <q Loa— / // / I�1--I IA / A
L00-- LOD— — \ 00— �I LOD— LOD— — L I
ii/`v�
V 61e—�j _
v�'EA j �� oG1fQ i PROPOSED 10' GREENWAY (-Y1)
0 �
1 I / PROPOSED 10' GREEN AY (-L1)
1 1 /
/
�
"16, .96') / / I I
------�---T�,.1--�--7---------\------�—��
L /--- ��—
v
�— — LOD- — LOD— LOD— — — LQD— — — LOD— — CLOD L0�— — LOD
I
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
\ /\ / CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE #3
\
J LOD
\ �,` EIP 5 REBAR / a i _
EIP 4 REBAR
PROPOSED 10'GREENWAY(-Y1)
vvv
v
v vvv A �����``v vvv-
V1 — —LOD— LOD— — —LOD A
F F /SF
` `T v ��me
SFv�— `---- -- SF
_ Z`' III
sFJ�
`- 40
\ /
IT
NORTH
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL INFO
> >
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
—LOD— — —LOD— — —
DISTURBED AREA
644
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
644
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
—SF—SF—SILT
FENCE
— — — —
FEMA FLOODWAY
-
FEMA 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN
ROCK PIPE INLET SEDIMENT
TRAP TYPE A
ROCK INLET SEDIMENT TRAP TYPE B
SPECIAL SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
ZO \
,e R \ NOR(N
\ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
` \
® \
\ 1
1
I
1
1
\ 1
\ 1
1
\ 1
1
1
\ > 1
1
1
\ � I
I
� 1
1
1
H
� I
1
I 1
I 1,
11
0
NJ
LL
Z
0
Z J
0 a
Of
W
Y 0
n/
LL Q 00
U�oQz
W W QO
LL
w LU
a 0
00-0
U C)
0
O
U
Z
SHEET NUMBER
C-9.10

0
E
r
11
\
/
v
\
t
I
/ 25" PINE /
V p ---o=------�----------
- —�
5------------------ o o m10 61
�� �. o o = ------------ L
4 1� , �-1
oIV V
� / o 30" PINE V �� '� `V IV
IV IV
�6Boo� D�
IV IV
1
QD— — —LOUD— — —LOB � — LpD— — —LOD— IVIV / /�1- �� �-W
—LODE — —LOD— —CLOD— — IV —LOD— — —LO� — —LOD— — —LOD— IV
IV W
/d/ gF I l II/ S -LOD- 'CLOD- - -LOD -� LODE - W
I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -
/ r----- i - �T------------ •�/---------- -- o Ul w
IV
IV
F IV \ IVFm
/ O
+ �mr<o via + 1 4l I i
__-oi00000 - - - - - O
\lb
I
\ l ..6
1 I I
I \\
I 1 �
'/
v O O Y
0 / /
� O �
cl)
41a /Y �
(3- - LOCH- i
ISED 10' 1314EENWAY P YS
i
/z
J
z
\ �9L'Q�
I �— I �� w
--------------/I-------�------------ �o F
-- \ 24,. r� --- - ---------------------------- --- ----
------
TREE
— L —'LOD— —— L D— —/ — LOD— — LOD—N1 LODE— — LOD— — — LOD— — — L00— — LOD— — — LOD— —'? L00— — .. LOD— — — LOD— —L W
y\W\ Z
- J
IU
NV
�'NV V NVoa `V'V <-------------1-------------------�------- ----�
---
18" PINEn
\
1 HIGHLAND CREEK COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION, INC
PIN: 4680-03-6119
I DB: 6527 PG: 324
> MB: 48 PG: 12
18" PINE
rLOD— — —LOD LOD— — —LOD— — —LOD— — —LOD LOD— — —LOD— — —LOD— — —L —
r-------------------------------------------------- \
_ �/
00' _ / 1
UO 600._�_ 1 \
—LOD— — —LOD —I
0
0
—1'--i ------
o 1 /�-7 --- \ L m --��-- -� \ ,----- -------------------
_ � � 1F c 'i �- _
4IN o // i `-__-------- L --.
o
_ 0 �� ��/ o
1 o
---- ------I - T, U!
l e o - i lI 606
1 /!
� - ��� //i / "moo _. ��/_/ A W
D �/ o �� �� ✓ v I �� �� LOD- - ° o� �C�oDs00 Lab -LOD�- -Li
w
<r
, J
/
e oe
i I III
/
/ oc
U
o\
'
I
roll
� (1 ,'
I I rRP NLs
r
1
�1
1
n
/
II
1
�
— LOD-_
-- LOD— —
— L00— — — LOD— — — LOD— — — LOD— -.
601- t v! PIP T O
N��NCLFO Do- o L� o - -dtior� - m Low -� �- u c
\ \ �' E/NOTE L#11 / I/
w,
W
sB2'��
00 A 1 T, Og 6
0 C\ U
L \605—
o I OD
O Z7
O
/ I • r m
ZK
/ mn
_ LDd
— L00—LOC3—
NpItTH
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
,IV
RTH
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
z
Y 0
n/
LL Q p 0
V�LEz
Lu Lu
L.L
LL O
0/ a
J 0
U vo
0
O
0
U SHEET NUMBER
C-9.11

E
11
PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL INFO
> >
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
—LOD— — —LOD— — —
DISTURBEDAREA
644
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
644
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
SF SF
SILT FENCE
— —
FEMA FLOODWAY
FEMA 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN
ROCK PIPE INLET SEDIMENT
TRAP TYPE A
ROCK INLET SEDIMENT TRAP TYPE B
SPECIAL SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
CITY OF CONCORD, A NORTH
CAROLINA MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION
PIN: 4680-23-8327
DB: 14010 PG: 249 /
MB: 39 PG: 41
XTRUCTI0Iq_ENFRANCE #
PROPOSED 10' GREENWAY (-Y4)
27,7 "FREE #1
/ / T /2 WA64)41
r�
T�� �
\ /
f
]D— Z — LOD—, — LO&- /� — _10) T — L(
19" TREE
I
/ �mGGGGm
F t/
— LOD�_SF SF y —
` 2
i
s, ° TREE 14
/
i
NORTH
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
J
Z V)
Z
Z J
0 a
U)
Of
W
0
z
Y 0
0�¢oO
U�oz
W LZ Q O
se w LULL
�00-0OL0
J 0 �
U vo
0
O
O
U
SHEET NUMBER
C-9.12

ZONES A
RIPARIAN SEED MIX (30 Ibs/acre)
COMMOM NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
PERCENT MIX
BLACKEYED SUSAN
Rudbecki¢ hit.
25
SOFT RUSH
✓uncvs effuses
15
DEERTONGUE
Pant— cLandestinum
10
PARTRIDGE PEA
Cha,_Grista fa.sciculata
10
PENNSYVALNIA SEDGE
Carer pensyvanica
5
RIVER OATS
Cha—thium latifolium
5
BROOMSEDGE
Andmpogon virginicvs
5
GOLDEN TICKSEED
Comapsis tinctoria
5
LITTLE BLUESTEM
Schizachyrium —part—
5
SWITCHGRASS
pant— virgatum
5
SIDEOATS GRAMA
Bouteloua curtipen.dvla
10
TEMPORARY SEEDING (ALL ZONES)
COMMON NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
PERCENT MIX
AUG 15 - MAY 15 (110lbslacre)
RYE GRAIN
Secale cem&e
85
ANNUAL RYE
Lolium mvltiflorum
10
BROWNTOP MILLET
Utochala rvmos¢
5
MAY 16 - AUG 14 (45 Ibslacre)
BROWNTOP MILLET
Utochola ramosa
80
ANNUAL RYE
Lolium m.ultiflorum
20
WETLAND SEED MIX (ZONE B)
COMMOM NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
PERCENT MIX
BEAKED PANICGRASS
Panicum anceps
39.5
VIRGINIA WLDRYE
Elymus virginicus
20
FOX SEDGE
Carer v ipi—dea
14
HOP SEDGE
Carer lupvli_
12
GLOBE BREAKSEDGE
Rhynchcspora. gLobularis
7
SOFT RUSH
Juncos effusus
3
CRIMSONEYED ROSEMELLOW
Hibiscus moscheutos
2.5
NEW YORK IRONWEED
Vernania noveboracensis
1.5
WOOLGRASS
Scirpus cyperinus
0.5
WATERS EDGE - 4' ON CENTER
COMMON NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
PERCENT MIX
ROWS
TYPE
SILKY WILLOW
SaLix sericea
45
2
LIVE STAKE
SILKY DOGWOOD
C.— ¢momum
35
2
LIVE STAKE
ELDERBERRY
S¢mbucua canadensis
10
2
LIVE STAKE
BLACK WILLOW
SaLix nigm
5
2
LIVE STAKE
TAG ALDER
Alnus serrmdata
5
2
TUBELING
SOFT RUSH
Juncos effLsys
50
1
1"-2" PLUG
SHALLOW SEDGE
I C.— Lurido
150
1
1"-2" PLUG
GENERALNOTES
1) ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHOULD BE RAKED/ROUGHENED (A MINIMUM OF 5"),
TOP SOIL ADDED, SEEDED (PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY), STRAWED, AND
THEN COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL MATTING (C700 OR APPROVED
EQUIVALENT) PER THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. ONCE THE
MATTING IS DOWN INSTALL THE LIVE STAKES AND TUBELINGS THROUGH THE
MATTING.
2) O.C. = ON -CENTER
3) IF DROUGHT CONDITIONS EXIST THE CONTRACTOR WILL WATER THE INSTALLED
VEGETATION WITH WATER FROM THE CREEK TO ENSURE 85% SURVIVAL AT
THE END OF THE 1-YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD.
4) APPLY TOPSOIL/COMPOST MIX 1.5" ON GRADED CHANNEL BANKS IN ZONE A.
5) APPLY 2,000 LB/ACRE STRAW ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING, WITH MATTING
OR A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL. A DISK WITH BLADES SET NEARLY STRAIGHT
CAN BE USED AS A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL.
6) RESEED AND MULCH IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EROSION OR OTHER DAMAGE
PER SECTION 6.10 OF NCDEQ EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DESIGN
MANUAL.
2.. _ 2-
TOP
FLAt"D
/
ESTABLISHED PLANT SHOWN
FOR INFORMA710N ONLY
GROUND
- LATERSURFACE
INSTALL SPLIT DEAD STOUT
STAKES PER SPECIFICAPONS
BARESIDEPLAN
7ING TO i0P
REMOF
RIP30"
LIVE CUTTING (DORMANT)
EXISPNG
GROUND
LOW SEAWATER T
euri ENo
LIVE STAKE DETAIL
LIVE STAKE (IN EARTH)
NOT TO SCALE
Y 0
Of¢oO
U�oz
Lu Lu
Y Lu L�
�00-0OL0
J � �
U 0
0
z
0
SHEET NUMBER
C-7.1

\\
V, 9
30" TREE
\ ALLEN MILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC
\
r
\
\
PIN: 4670-07-7119
D9: 14287 PG: 239
MB: 84 PG: 39
_
N
A < _
' /T/
l \ /\�/
zi
1
\
NI
\ to' 0
�l
+
6 9 m
,IN 6v
m m¢r
om aoo�o ¢m
/
+
I++
ITT
-��—
p
og -------�
-� ---`�' B
- o8OOlOOA LLZg84
o
19V1
618
- \
1 <q
/ / //
RI
�
620
—
_
_
— ��
— —
679 G
R
\1 \ I I
�
�1 1 l I
A
A
-622--
`A�a
Im:'�c�'•�
-623
— _—��
��'
IRA
q-
625
PT:
ij
101,10.6g
j �'/
/
mm
gpo
� 60
601,
11
¢6 600600 _ c' /
DRAIN / .------- A
-—
' '7 _7-� _
601' V'7'7 '17 '7
'7 V cV' 7 �7-
'7
0
_ 6
�pV-V '7 ++ +
�� 17-k7 17 0 17 0 �I / i +{ ++
v /7 17 v 0 V 17 17 17 7 �' / /+ +
�V � 0w 0 17 0 17 '57- + J�
1 7o� ���� 0 + e
�Il�+ +�, oo
v 17 0`/"7 �7 17 �+ F
oT\oo7d00000
77777777177
00000000
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 10 20 40
NORTH
\
/
/
rl
r' T,
IT
_ o
` m z
o -
/ O o
V o
C/D O
U F
� zz
� o
z � o
0
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET -
r
0 10 20 40 a a \ a
NORTH
TR ®LS r ^
V
17
17 17 0 17 17 17 17 17 17 0 ��� �� `moo ---600
qv 0 17 �7 � � � � � � � 00 % -1- 60 _ l i �ui
zsoo
�o7V�57-a 0/�I s9, 6�� °�
6
17 17 �'-t/� 7/17—� � V 0 1 PIPE�w/r-Posr/ / '�a �/v �0
E/NOTE /�11 600
KE fAEIX EUO
0 '7 0 7 O D 7 '7 D O D r, mucc�n '��> ( O `
�� '7 6°0 � /� �00 W
LNLJ 0
6'0 �� �� LL < p
24- TREE �� 6 `�
/ /' LL Z
l 6 64 � -/ " - t� 10
I` l 605— w L < U
-- - - � � w LL
o A oe a 0
PROPOSED PLANTING PLAN LEGEND J (�
U vo
0
O
ZONE A: RIPARIAN SEED MIX u
0
p p p p SHEET NUMBER
p p p p ZONE B: WETLAND SEED MIX C-7 2

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
REQUEST

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
Form Approved -
REQUEST FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)
OMB No.0710-0024
For use of this form, see Sec 404 CWA, Sec 10 RHA, Sec 103 MPRSA; the proponent agency is CECW-COR.
Expires 2024-04-30
DATA REQUIRED BY THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
Authority Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and
Sanctuaries Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule 33 CFR 320-332.
Principal Purpose The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources
within the review area that are or that may be subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the
public, and may be made available as part of a public notice or FOIA request as required by federal law. Your name and property
location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in any approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will
be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USACE website.
Disclosure Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, if the information is not provided there may be some delay in
processing your request. Failure to provide this information will not result in an adverse action.
System of Record Notice (SORN): The information received is entered into our permit tracking database and a SORN has been
completed (SORN #At 145b) and may be accessed at the following website:
http://dpcld.defense.gov/Privacy/SORNsIndex/DOD-wide-SORN-Article-View/Article/670116/a1146b-ce.aspxx
The Agency Disclosure Notice (ADN)
The Public reporting burden for this collection of information, 0710-0024, is estimated to average 10 minutes per response, including time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
Send comments regarding the burden estimate or burden reduction suggestions to the Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, at
whs.mc-alex.esd.mbx.dd-dod-information-collectionse-mail.mil. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no
person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
1. To (District Name): Wilmington District, Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
2. I am requesting a JD on property located at (Street Address): Multiple - Linear project
City/Township/Parish: Concord County: Cabarrus State: North Carolina
Acreage of Parcel/Review Area for JD: 21
Section: Township: Range:
Latitude (decimal degrees): Longitude (decimal degrees):
35.3945696°-80.7387917°
(For linear projects, please include the center point of the proposed alignment.)
3. Please attach a survey/plat map and vicinity map identifying location and review area for the JD.
4. ❑ I currently own this property. I plan to purchase this property.
❑X 1 am an agent/consultant acting on behalf of the requester.
1-1 Other (please explain):
ENG FORM 6247, NOV 2023 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. Page 1 of 3

5. Reason for request: (check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources
❑ under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would
❑ be used to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may require authorization from the Corps; this request is
❑/� accompanied by my permit application and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list
❑ and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order to obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the
❑ aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
6. Type of determination being requested:
❑ 1 am requesting an approved JD.
❑X I am requesting a preliminary JD.
❑ 1 am requesting a "no permit required" letter as I believe my proposed activity is not regulated.
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information to inform my decision.
7. Typed or Printed Name: Taylor Kiker Daytime Phone No.: [phone]
Company Name: Kimley-Horn Email Address: Taylor.Kiker(a�kimley-hom.com
Address: 200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina 28202
By signing below, you are indicating that you have the authority, or are acting as the duly authorized agent of a person or entity with such authority, to
and do hereby grant Corps personnel right of entry to legally access the site if needed to perform the JD. Your signature shall be an affirmation that
you possess the requisite property rights to request a JD on the subject property.
ENG FORM 6247, NOV 2023 Page 2 of 3

Signature: j Ik - Date:2024-02-14 I
ENG FORM 6247, NOV 2023 Page 3 of 3

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
Form Approved -
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD)
OMB No.0710-0024
For use of this form, see Sec 404 CWA, Sec 10 RHA, Sec 103 MPRSA; the proponent agency is CECW-COR.
Expires 2024-04-30
DATA REQUIRED BY THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
Authority Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and
Sanctuaries Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Program of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Final Rule for 33 CFR
Parts 320-332.
Principal Purpose The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources
within the review area that may be subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the
public, and may be made available as part of a public notice or FOIA request as required by federal law. Your name and property
location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in any resulting jurisdictional determination (JD), which
may be made available to the public on the District's website and/or on the Headquarters USACE website.
Disclosure Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for a JD cannot be evaluated
nor can a PJD be issued.
The Agency Disclosure Notice (ADN)
The public reporting burden for this collection of information, 0710-0024, is estimated to average 25 minutes per response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of
information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or burden reduction suggestions to the Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters
Services, at whs.mc-alex.esd.mbx.dd-dod-information-collectionsQmail.mil. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of
law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control
number.
SECTION I - BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
Taylor Kiker, 200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina 28202
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
Wilmington District, Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
D. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County/Parish/Borough: Cabarrus City: Concord
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.394569 o Longitude: 80.738791 o
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17N
Name of nearest waterbody: Clarke Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECKALL THATAPPLY):
1-1 Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination
Date(s): 07/20/2023, 07/24/2023, 09/07/2023, 09/26/2023, and 09/27/2023
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY JURISDICTION.
Site
Latitude (decimal
Longitude
Estimated amount of
Type of aquatic resource
Geographic authority to which the
Number
degrees)
(decimal degrees)
aquatic resource in review
(i.e., wetland vs. non-
aquatic resource "may be"
area (acreage and linear
wetland waters)
subject (i.e., Section 404 or
feet, if applicable)
Section 101404)
Sla-Sll
35.39456960
-80.73879170
1,486 LF/0.50-ac
non -wetland waters
404
ENG FORM 6249, NOV 2023 Page 1 of 3

Site
Latitude (decimal
Longitude
Estimated amount of
Type of aquatic resource
Geographic authority to which the
Number
degrees)
(decimal degrees)
aquatic resource in review
(i.e., wetland vs. non-
aquatic resource "may be"
area (acreage and linear
wetland waters)
subject (i.e., Section 404 or
feet, if applicable)
Section 101404)
S2
35.39930630
-80.74387480
105 LF/0.02-ac
non -wetland waters
404
S3
35.39904210
-80.74376760
104 LF/0.12-ae
non -wetland waters
404
Wla-Wlk
35.39456960
-80.73879170
3.81-ac
wetland waters
404
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby
advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed
the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit
verification requiring "preconstruction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit
applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD or no JD whatsoever, which do not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing
a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit
authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit,
including whatever mitigation requirements the USACE has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD or reliance on no JD whatsoever;
(6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of USACE permit
authorization based on a PJD or no JD whatsoever constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that
activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be
processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make
an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of
jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the USACE will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD
finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all
aquatic features in the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
F. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
1-1 Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Rationale:
1-1 Data sheets prepared by the USACE:
1-1 Corps navigable waters' study:
1-1 U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
ENG FORM 6249, NOV 2023 Page 2 of 3

USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑x U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
1:24k - Kannapolis
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: Cabarrus Co. SSURGO Soils
National Wetlands Inventory map(s).
Cite Name: NWI digital data
State/Local Wetland Inventory map(s):
ZFEMA/FIRM maps:
FIRM Panel 4670 and 4680
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
© Photographs: � Aerial (Name & Date): Nearmap Aerial Imagery (2023)
or ] Other (Name & Date): Site Photographs (07/20/23), (07/24/23), (09/07/23), (09/26/23), and (09/27/23)
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the USACE and should not be relied upon
for later jurisdictional determinations.
Name of Regulatory Staff Member Completing PJD
Date
Signature of Regulatory Staff Member Completing PJD
Name of Person Requesting PJD
Date
Signatureof Person Requesting PJD (REQUIRED, unless
obtaining the Signature is Impracticable
Taylor Kiker
2024-01-30
- 11'k _,
Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established time frame, the
district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.
ENG FORM 6249, NOV 2023 Page 3 of 3

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 1/29/2024
Project/ S1- Clarke Creek Greenway
Site:
Latitude: 35.3945696'
Evaluator: DF, GB
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:-80.7387917'
Total Points: 40
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
Kannapolis
e.g. Quad Name:
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 21.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
1 3
3
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2
8. Headcuts
0
1 1
2
3
0
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 9.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1 0
0.5
1 1
1.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
I No = 0
I Yes = 3
1 3
C. Biology Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
1.5
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. Seep. 35 of manual.
Notes:
S1 is a mapped USGS solid blue -line stream named Clarke Creek. S1 Originates
off -site and flows on -site for 1,695 LF on -site before continuing off -site.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 1/29/2024
Project/ S2 - Clarke Creek Greenway
Site:
Latitude: 35.3993063'
Evaluator: DF, GB
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:-80.7438748'
Total Points: 30.5
Stream Determination (cir
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Kannapolis
Ephemeral Intermitten erennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 15
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
0
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
3
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 9.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1 0
0.5
1 1
1.5
1 1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Biology Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
1 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. Seep. 35 of manual.
Notes
S2 is a mapped USGES dashed blue -line stream that flows for 104 LF on -site before
continuing off -site.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 1/29/2024
Project/ S3 - Clarke Creek Greenway
Site:
Latitude: 35.3990421'
Evaluator: DF, GB
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:-80.7437676'
Total Points: 30.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Kannapolis
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 15
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
0
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
3
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 9.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1 0
0.5
1 1
1.5
1 1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
I No = 0
IYes = 3
1 3
C. Biology Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5; Other = 0
1 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. Seep. 35 of manual.
Notes
S3 is a mapped USGES dashed blue -line stream that flows for 105 LF on -site before
continuing off -site

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Clarke Creek Greenway City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 2023-07-24
Applicant/Owner: The City of Concord State: "OfthCaroha Sampling Point: Up-1
Investigator(s):RDF&MV Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P 136 Lat: 35.39602036 Long: -80.74005859 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ✓ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No —
H dric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ Is the Sampled Area
y — — within a Wetland? Yes No V
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Data point Up-1 is representative of the forested uplands on -site. According to the APT, the
delineation was conducted during "normal" conditions.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No ✓
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators were not observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: UP-1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Carpinus caroliniana
3. Carya glabra
4. Liriodendron tulipifera
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 12.50
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r )
1 Carpinus caroliniana
9 Liauidambar stvraciflua
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 12.50
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ft r )
1. Parthenocissus quinquefolia
2. Ligustrum sinense
3. Microstegium vimineum
4. Toxicodendron radicans
5 Vitis rotundifolia
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 12.00
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r )
1.
2.
5.
50% of total cover: 0.00
numpers nere or on a sepa
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Testworksheet:
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
10
✓
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5
(A)
5
✓
FAC
5
✓
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
9
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
5
✓
FACU
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 55.56
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
25 = Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
20% of total cover: 5.00
OBL species 0
x 1 =
0
_
FACW species 0
x 2 =
0
15 ✓ FAC
FAC species 49
x 3 =
147
10 ✓ FAC
FACU species 25
x 4 =
100
UPL species 0
x 5 =
0
Column Totals: 74
(A)
247 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.34
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
25 = Total Cover
_
4 -Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
20% of total cover: 5.00
-
-
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
10 ✓ FACU
- Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5 ✓ FACU
5 ✓ FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
2 FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
24 = Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20% of total cover: 4.80
-
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
heiaht.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
0 = Total Cover Present?
20% of total cover: 0.00
Hydrophytic vegetation was observed based on the dominance test.
Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-2 7.5YR 3/3 100 Clay Loam
2 -16 2.5YR 4/6 100 Clay Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. `Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric
Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soil was not observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Clarke Creek Greenway City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 2023-07-24
Applicant/Owner: The City of Concord State: "OfthCaroha Sampling Point: Wet-1
Investigator(s):RDF&MV Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Toeslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0.5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: 35.39649718 Long: -80.73908753 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No `/ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No �/
— Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes v/ No
within a Wetland? Yes V No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes v/ No
Remarks:
Data point Wet-1 is representative of the northern portion of Wetland 1. The data point is situated within the floodplain of Clarke Creek.
Hydrology is primarily influenced by toe -of -slope seepage and overbank flooding of Clarke Creek. Hydrology indicators include saturation,
drift deposits, water -stained leaves, oxidized rhizospheres, crayfish burrows, and geomorphic position.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓ Saturation (A3)
✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
✓ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
✓ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
✓ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators
were observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Wet-1
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Testworksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Carpinus caroliniana
10
✓ FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10
✓ FACW
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
10
✓ FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
4. Acer rubrum
5
FAC
5. Ulmus americana
5
FACW
Percent of Dominant Species 100.00
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
40
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 20.00
20% of total cover: 8.00
OBL species 10 x 1 = 10
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r )
FACW species 15 x 2 = 30
1 Acer rubrum
15
✓ FAC
FAC species 55 x 3 = 165
2. Carpinus caroliniana
10
✓ FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4
Column Totals: 80 (A) 205 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.56
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
✓ 2 -Dominance Test is >50°k
9.
✓ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
25
= Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 12.50
20% of
total cover: 5.00
-
5 ft r
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Saururus cernuus
10
✓ OBL
-
2. Smilax rotundifolia
5
✓ FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10.
m) tall.
11.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
15
= Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover: 7.50
20% of total cover: 3.00
30 ft r
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
height.
2.
Hydrophytic
5. Vegetation
0 = Total Cover Present? Yes No ✓
50% of total cover: 0.00 20% of total cover: 0.00
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation was observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Wet-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 4/2 90
5YR 4/6 10 C M
Clay Loam
6 -18 10YR 4/1 95
7.5YR 5/6 5 C M
Sandy Clay Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
A depleted matrix was observed from a depth of 0 to 18 inches.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Clarke Creek Greenway City/County: Cabarrus Sampling Date: 2023-07-24
Applicant/Owner: The City of Concord State: "OfthCaroha Sampling Point: Wet-2
Investigator(s):RDF&MV Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Toeslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0.5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: 35.39581668 Long: -80.73995041 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: EnD - Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No `/ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No -
- Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes v/ No
Remarks:
Data point Wet-2 is representative of the areas where Wetland 1 continues into sewer easement. The data
point is situated in the center of the project area. Hydrology is primarily influenced by toe -of -slope seepage
and surface runoff. Hydrology indicators include saturation and geomorphic position.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓ Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No ✓
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Wet-2
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Testworksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft r )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
0 = Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
0.00 20% of total cover: 0.00
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ft r
)
FACW species 15 x 2 = 30
1
FAC species 25 x 3 = 75
2
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
3
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4
Column Totals: 45 (A) 125 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.78
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
✓ 2 -Dominance Test is >50°k
9.
✓ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
0 = Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
0.00 20% of total cover: 0.00
-
5 ft r
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Microstegium vimineum
25 ✓ FAC
-
2. Scirpus cyperinus
10 ✓ FACW
3. Juncus effusus
5 FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4. Prunella vulgaris
5 FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10.
m) tall.
11.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
45 = Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover:
22.50 20% of total cover: 9.00
30 ft r
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
)
height.
2.
Hydrophytic
5. Vegetation
0 = Total Cover Present? Yes ✓ No
50% of total cover: 0.00 20% of total cover: 0.00
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic vegetation was observed
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Wet-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-6 2.5Y 5/2 85
7.5YR 4/6 15 C M
Silty Clay Loam
6 -18 10YR 4/1 80
2.5YR 4/6 20 C M
Clay Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
A depleted matrix was observed from a depth of 0 to 18 inches.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Photo Page 1
� r
,,, n C 1. ,�..� lY•.
� ..-.—=.4w..
Photo 1 - Stream 1 (Clarke Creek) -Perennial stream
'emds
P
Photo 2 - Stream 1 (Clarke Creek) -Perennial stream
Title Photo Pages
Prepared For Clarke Creek Greenway Prepared By
Project Cabamxs County, NC
Date
07/20/2023, 07/24/2023, Project Number Ki i � � ■ m l eV ))) H o r n
�H(9hTPerfortnnnr�Llviny
•••••'••"••••' 09/07/2023, 09/26/2023, & 01529029
09/27/2023

Photo Page 3
M.- •�
l 4
`Ff4
APF
Photo 5 — Stream 2 (S2) — Perennial Stream
i Wgj.
-
l r
_fW
i
gY
C
t
7�-
Photo 6 — Stream 2 (S2) — Perennial Stream
Title
Photo Pages
Prepared For
Project
Clarke Creek Greenway
Cabamxs County, NC
Prepared By
\ORTH CAROLINA
n {/ i m le ,
111 Y j>}Horn
Date
Project Number
07/20/2023, 07/24/2023,
High Perionnance ilving
■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■'
09/07/2023, 09/26/2023, &
01529029
09/27/2023

Photo Page 4
1. i � • .
•, Pam•
y+ll V n x a 9a
if
,7-N`
1OF
Al
r
,
Photo 7—hStream 3 (S3) — Perennial Stream
'p -0
Photo 8 — Stream 3 (S3) — Perennial Stream
Title
Photo Pages
Prepared For
Project
Clarke Creek Greenway
Prepared By
Cabamxs County, NC
Date
Project Number
\ORTH CAROLINA
n {/ i m le ,
111 Y j>}Horn
07/20/2023, 07/24/2023,
High Perionnance ilving
■■■■■•'■■■•"■"
09/07/2023, 09/26/2023, &
01529029
09/27/2023

Photo Page 5
Photo 9 — Representative vegetative community of Wetland 1 at data point Wet-1.
Photo 10 — Representative soil profile of Wetland 1 at data point Wet-1
Title Photo Pages
Prepared For Clarke Creek Greenway Prepared By
Project Cabamxs County, NC
Date 07/20/2023, 07/24/2023, Project Number n {/ i m le Y ,
\ORTH CAROLINA 111 j>}Horn
High Perionnance ilving
■"'■■'■■■■"'■' 09/07/2023, 09/26/2023, & 01529029
09/27/2023

Photo Page 6
And
21
ra
4 Rim
Photo 11 — Representative vegetative community of Wetland 1 at data point Wet-2.
e i�
0
■ 4-��, y 4� i.
i
Photo 12 — Representative soil profile of Wetland 1 at data point Wet-2.
Title
Photo Pages
Prepared For
Project
Clarke Creek Greenway
Prepared By
Cabamxs County, NC
Date
Project Number
\ORTH CAROLINA
n {/ i m le ,
111 Y j>}Horn
07/20/2023, 07/24/2023,
High Perionnance ilving
■••••••■■■•••�•'
09/07/2023, 09/26/2023, &
01529029
09/27/2023

Photo Page 7
Photo 13 — Representative vegetative community of forested uplands on -site at data point Up-1.
Photo 14 — Representative soil profile of forested uplands on -site at data point Up-1.
Title Photo Pages
Prepared For Clarke Creek Greenway Prepared By
Project Cabamxs County, NC
Date 07/20/2023, 07/24/2023, Project Number n {/ i m le Y ,
\ORTH CAROLINA 111 j>}Horn
High Perionnance ilving
■••••••■■■•••�•' 09/07/2023, 09/26/2023, & 01529029
09/27/2023

Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network
7
6
1
0
Daily Total
30-Day Rolling Total
30 Year Normal Range
2 3 06-20 2023-07-20
2023 5-21
1 -
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
2022
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
Coordinates
35.3945696,-80.7387917
Observation Date
2023-07-20
Elevation (ft)
600.271
Drought Index (PDSI)
Normal
WebWIMP HZO Balance
Dry Season
Figure and tables made by the
Antecedent Precipitation Tool
Version 1.0
Written by Jason Deters
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
30 Days Ending
301h °/pile (in)
701h °/pile (in)
Observed (in)
Wetness Condition
Condition Value
Month Weight
Product
2023-07-20
2.93189
5.353937
4.598425
Normal
2
3
6
2023-06-20
2.820079
4.634646
4.598425
Normal
2
2
4
2023-05-21
2.58189
4.414173
3.480315
Normal
2
1
2
Result
I
I
i
I
I
INormal
Conditions - 12
Weather Station Name
Coordinates
Elevation (ft)
Distance (mi)
Elevation A
Weighted A
Days Normal
Days Antecedent
CONCORD
35.4136,-80.5639
669.948
9.937
69.677
5.164
11347
90
CONCORD 1.8 ENE
35.4135,-80.564
675.853
0.009
5.905
0.004
2
0
CONCORD 4.5 SW
35.3647,-80.655
636.155
6.144
33.793
2.972
4
0

Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network
7
6
6r
2
1
0
2023-06-2
■ 1&I-
2023-t, OS- 54
20 -07-24
r
n
Daily Total
30-Day Rolling Total
30 Year Normal Range
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
Coordinates
35.3945695,-80.7387917
Observation Date
2023-07-24
Elevation (ft)
600.271
Drought Index (PDSI)
Normal
WebWIMP HZO Balance
Dry Season
Figure and tables made by the
Antecedent Precipitation Tool
Version 1.0
Written by Jason Deters
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
30 Days Ending
301h °/pile (in)
701h °/pile (in)
Observed (in)
Wetness Condition
Condition Value
Month Weight
Product
2023-07-24
3.32441
6.404725
2.736221
Dry
1
3
3
2023-06-24
3.01063
4.69252
6.53937
Wet
3
2
6
2023-05-25
2.586614
4.502756
2.850394
Normal
2
1
2
Result
I
I
I
I
i
I
I Normal Conditions - 11
Weather Station Name
Coordinates
Elevation (ft)
Distance (mi)
Elevation A
Weighted A
Days Normal
Days Antecedent
CONCORD
35.4136,-80.5639
669.948
9.937
69.677
5.164
11347
90
CONCORD 1.8 ENE
35.4135,-80.564
675.853
0.009
5.905
0.004
2
0
CONCORD 4.5 SW
35.3647,-80.655
636.155
6.144
33.793
2.972
4
0

Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network
10
n
Ln
IZ-
U 6
. [6 4
ty
2
0
Daily Total
30-Day Rolling Total
30 Year Normal Range
2023-09-07
IVr
J
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2024
Coordinates
35.3945696,-80.7387917
Observation Date
2023-09-07
Elevation (ft)
600.271
Drought Index (PDSI)
Incipient drought
WebWIMP H2O Balance
Dry Season
Figure and tables made by the
Antecedent Precipitation Tool
Version 1.0
Written by Jason Deters
�- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
30 Days Ending
301h %ile (in)
701h %ile (in)
Observed (in)
Wetness Condition
Condition Value
Month Weight
Product
2023-09-07
3.179134
6.224803
9.464567
Wet
3
3
9
2023-08-08
2.936221
5.02441
3.362205
Normal
2
2
4
2023-07-09
3.49252
5.931103
6.807087
Wet
3
1
3
Result
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Wetter than Normal - 16
Weather Station Name
Coordinates
Elevation (ft)
Distance (mi)
Elevation A
Weighted A
Days Normal
Days Antecedent
ALBEMARLE
35.4,-80.1994
609.908
30.382
9.637
13.965
10548
90
NEW LONDON 1.5 W
35.4398,-80.2466
628.937
3.824
19.029
1.794
1
0
RICHFIELD 0.2 SSW
35.4683,-80.2578
652.887
5.751
42.979
2.835
24
0
ALBEMARLE 5.1 SSE
35.2944,-80.1596
445.866
7.633
164.042
4.687
1
0
MT PLEASANT
35.4117,-80.4311
720.144
13.073
110.236
7.324
19
0
NORWOOD 6 W
35.2206,-80.2275
450.131
12.496
159.777
7.62
625
0
NORWOOD 2 NE
35.2475,-80.1244
290.026
11.353
319.882
8.74
30
0
LEXINGTON 9.0 S
35.6784,-80.2448
649.934
19.404
40.026
9.508
9
0
CONCORD
35.4136,-80.5639
669.948
20.548
60.04
10.48
96
0

Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network
10
n
. [6 4
ty
2
0
2023-09-26
40)3 -07-28
2023-08-27
Li
Daily Total
30-Day Rolling Total
30 Year Normal Range
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2024
2024
Coordinates
35.3945696,-80.7387917
Observation Date
2023-09-26
Elevation (ft)
600.271
Drought Index (PDSI)
Incipient drought
WebWIMP H2O Balance
Dry Season
Figure and tables made by the
Antecedent Precipitation Tool
Version 1.0
Written by Jason Deters
�- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
30 Days Ending
301h %ile (in)
701h %ile (in)
Observed (in)
Wetness Condition
Condition Value
Month Weight
Product
2023-09-26
2.497244
4.685433
7.952756
Wet
3
3
9
2023-08-27
3.779921
5.775984
3.822835
Normal
2
2
4
2023-07-28
3.385039
5.144882
3.862205
Normal
2
1
2
Result
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Wetter than Normal - 15
Weather Station Name
Coordinates
Elevation (ft)
Distance (mi)
Elevation A
Weighted A
Days Normal
Days Antecedent
ALBEMARLE
35.4,-80.1994
609.908
30.382
9.637
13.965
10548
90
NEW LONDON 1.5 W
35.4398,-80.2466
628.937
3.824
19.029
1.794
1
0
RICHFIELD 0.2 SSW
35.4683,-80.2578
652.887
5.751
42.979
2.835
24
0
ALBEMARLE 5.1 SSE
35.2944,-80.1596
445.866
7.633
164.042
4.687
1
0
MT PLEASANT
35.4117,-80.4311
720.144
13.073
110.236
7.324
19
0
NORWOOD 6 W
35.2206,-80.2275
450.131
12.496
159.777
7.62
625
0
NORWOOD 2 NE
35.2475,-80.1244
290.026
11.353
319.882
8.74
30
0
LEXINGTON 9TT-T
35.6784,-80.2448
649.934
19.404
40.026
9.508
9
0
CONCORD
1 35.4136,-80.5639
669.948
1 20.548
60.04
10.48
96
0

Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network
10
n
N
U 6
. [6 4
ty
2
0
Daily Total
30-Day Rolling Total
30 Year Normal Range
M2023-08-28
I 2023-09-27
/ 2023-07-29
Tip
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2023
2024
2024
Coordinates
35.3945695,-80.7387917
Observation Date
2023-09-27
Elevation (ft)
600.271
Drought Index (PDSI)
Incipient drought
WebWIMP H2O Balance
Dry Season
Figure and tables made by the
Antecedent Precipitation Tool
Version 1.0
Written by Jason Deters
�- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
30 Days Ending
301h %ile (in)
701h %ile (in)
Observed (in)
Wetness Condition
Condition Value
Month Weight
Product
2023-09-27
2.677165
5.22441
4.901575
Normal
2
3
6
2023-08-28
3.574016
5.78504
6.874016
Wet
3
2
6
2023-07-29
3.385039
5.114961
3.862205
Normal
2
1
2
Result
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Normal Conditions - 14
Weather Station Name
Coordinates
Elevation (ft)
Distance (mi)
Elevation A
Weighted A
Days Normal
Days Antecedent
ALBEMARLE
35.4,-80.1994
609.908
30.382
9.637
13.965
10548
90
NEW LONDON 1.5 W
35.4398,-80.2466
628.937
3.824
19.029
1.794
1
0
RICHFIELD 0.2 SSW
35.4683,-80.2578
652.887
5.751
42.979
2.835
24
0
ALBEMARLE 5.1 SSE
35.2944,-80.1596
445.866
7.633
164.042
4.687
1
0
MT PLEASANT
35.4117,-80.4311
720.144
13.073
110.236
7.324
19
0
NORWOOD 6 W
35.2206,-80.2275
450.131
12.496
159.777
7.62
625
0
NORWOOD 2 NE
35.2475,-80.1244
290.026
11.353
319.882
8.74
30
0
LEXINGTON 9.0 S
35.6784,-80.2448
649.934
19.404
40.026
9.508
9
0
CONCORD
35.4136,-80.5639
669.948
20.548
60.04
10.48
96
0

AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE

Kimley»>Horn
January 23, 2024
Ms. Renee Gledhill -Earley
Environmental Review Coordinator
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-4617
Re: Clarke Creek Greenway
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Earley,
Kimley-Horn is writing this letter on behalf of our client, The City of Concord, to request a review and comment on
any possible issues that might emerge with respect to cultural resource issues associated with the proposed
project in Cabarrus County, North Carolina.
The project corridor begins off of Poplar Tent Road slightly northwest of Carolina International School. The corridor
then runs south adjacent to Clarke Creek until it turns back to the northwest, crossing Clarke Creek and ending
adjacent to Cox Mill Elementary School in Cabarrus County, North Carolina. (Figures 1-3). The proposed project
seeks to construct a public greenway.
We request that you review the site based on the attached information to determine the presence of any
archeological, cultural, or historic resources. If a response has not been received within 30 days we will assume
that you have reviewed the project area and that there are no issues to address at the present time.
Thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please email ([e-mail])
a copy of your reply and/or send an original copy by mail. If you have any questions regarding this request, please
feel free to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
'J J�' '�k'
Taylor Kiker, PWS
Environmental Scientist

Bradford
y Regional Park
McCo<a Rd
I \ti
Northstone !�
Country Club
m
a
a
HuncG,
David B
Waymer Flying
Field
:w_y
1�
\6�
c
�\ m
�ntz Rc,
� Ge
Skybrook Golf r
Club
Cox Mill
K ;
U Q
\ Concord -Padgett
Highland Creek \ Regional Airport
Golf Club \
\ a�
roc
A
Ne
a
v9P� Rocky River
Golf Club at
Concord d'
Mallard Creek
Regional Park
% / ya&"eh D r
ET
ch
Tradition Golf Mo 0 2,000 4,000 8,000
\\ Course �
�_—� rehQ Feet
Croft F B�oGo��,a \ �aa 1 IN = 4,000 FT
Notes
Figure 1: Vicinity Map Basemapsource:
ESRI World Street Map
eHornClarke Creek Greenway
Kim >> Concord, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
January 2024
3
c
Q
CL
yCh4r
N
o
Qom/
S tesvill
jL
1
alishury
�
73
=�av
1T5t -.
MOD dsville
4
Poplar Tent
N
m
o
Concord
\\
o
tarsi
h arlotte
pJar_Te
l
m
0
R
z
Legend
C::::] Project Boundary

�Z
r,
r � -
_ Moo esville
t
- -•�� -
M 7 Concord
�•—Q ri' 1
,;" Lj � stanfa
k-'r �� I'� ■ harlotte
Legend
oll
- 9
Project Boundary
J
Y 1i
1i ! f
Sri �it A
~ it- 0 600 1,200 2,400
r• r r - Feet
I� a _ _ ;' f ■ f 1 IN = 11200 FT
f
Figure 2: USGS Topographic (Kannapolis) Map Baoetmeap source:
■
Clarke Creek Greenway USGS USATopographic Map
Kimley)))Horn
Concord, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
January 2024

• j r3 ' � M . l r •• i •.+' r ' J ` rp • , i .. �`�ti0 BuCC`5 �� S �F G1r�
•'" "' '
' • 1 Po13 rent
, Cox
JA
ks
fv
rie; . yr► 5•. 1",* r _ _ _ , , � � •♦ � . � ` � _ - � � � - I � * ,.•
� ,� � \` � , �, i ,,,: ��, - .ir. ADC � J�:���• t -� � N
,yint Ln
O' %
r t xa+` ti. J •��-�f►'r•
m
ail dos
AM
ro
J y �j L r •
p Ile
• �, 1 ,�iH � .� • y �. ��' Y�,f ,� �,hK",a •.� � ! ram• :/�. - !'/ k+ .� f v r '
ter••.-- •: - ♦ - - - c. - s
Highland Creek v
�IGolf Club
♦al
A.
� N• . ��,.► .!yid. ••1� ``/'3 � � � ' - .�
`ard Creek'P"k�l'Y . 4"k,
`avKe Creek Pkwy��.` �.•..'y 1' .. _'
'Highland Creek �°
Golf Club m h• - , • ` o
* .:_SIC. K i • 'd.. `, Aviation alvq
Ole
'til •• .'iY �►`;.. -••�.•„J' r• ���ar� � � 7 .7►"� ,.ems �� �+' •..;�y r� i 1. c?'`� '. a ��� �F
# tit. f '•.' 'i R S�yT 1 l•,*�r• !.♦ -1 •� ; �,. .Sr T• _ -.
aTAV]■[1
VI

Fox, Doug
From: Hamstead, Byron A <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2023 11:34 AM
To: Fox, Doug
Cc: Kiker, Taylor
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Clarke Creek Greenway (Project Code: 2023-0129965) - Cabarrus
County - USFWS Concurrence Request
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
IYou don't often get email from [e-mail]. Learn why this is important
Thanks Doug,
Can you send .shp files or .kmz for this project? Dont go to the trouble if they are not already prepared.
We offer the following comments/concurrence pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA):
Based on the information provided in your biological evaluation (BE), low -quality suitable habitat for the federally
endangered Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) and Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) occurs within
the proposed action area. However, your BE indicates that evidence for these species were not detected during
targeted botanical surveys conducted September 26-27, 2023. Therefore, we believe the probability for project -
meditated loss of these species is insignificant and/or discountable and would concur with a "may affect, not
likely to adversely affect" determinations from the action agency. Botanical survey results for this species are valid
for two years for the purposes of ESA consultation: https://www.fws.gov/story/2022-03/north-carolinas-federally-
threatened-endangered-and-risk-plant-species
The information provided indicates that suitable forage and/or roosting habitat for the proposed endangered
tricolored bat (Perimyotis subfiavus) occurs within the proposed action area. To minimize impacts to this species,
we encourage project proponents to accomplish any necessary tree clearing outside of the "active season" for this
animal. In our office work area, the active season for tricolored bat generally occurs during the warmer time of year
from April 1 to September 30, but may be extended in areas adjacent to hibernacula. Although this species is not
currently afforded legal protection under Section 7 of the ESA, this impact minimization measure would support
our concurrence with a "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determination from the appropriate action
agency should this species become listed in the future. If the proposed action would not affect suitable habitat for
this animal, we would not object to a "no effect" determination from the appropriate action agency.
Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) is a candidate species, and we appreciate project proponents'
consideration of monarch butterflywhen evaluating the action area for impacts to federally listed species and
their habitats. This animal is also not subject to Section 7 consultation, and an effects determination from the
action agency is not necessary. If requested, general recommendations for pollinators including monarch butterfly
can be provided should the project proponent choose to implementthem in the future.
The information provided indicates that suitable habitat is not presentwithin the action area for any other federally
listed species. Therefore, we consider consultation to be complete and require no further action at this time.
Please be aware that obligations under Section 7 of the ESA must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals
impacts of the identified action may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered,

(2) the identified action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) anew
species is listed or critical habitat is determined that maybe affected by the identified action.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Happy New Year!
Byro n
Byron Hamstead
(he/him)
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801
This email correspondence and any attachments to and from this sender is subject to the Freedom of Information Act and may be disclosed to third
parties.
From: Hamstead, Byron A <byron_hamstead @fws.gov>
Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 9:37 AM
To: Fox, Doug <[e-mail]>
Cc: Kiker, Taylor <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Clarke Creek Greenway (Project Code: 2023-0129965) - Cabarrus County - USFWS Concurrence
Request
Thanks Doug.
We have added this request to our list for review and will respond within 30d.
Regards,
Byro n
Byron Hamstead
(he/him)
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801
This email correspondence and any attachments to and from this sender is subject to the Freedom of Information Act and may be disclosed to third
parties.
From: Fox, Doug <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 9:29 AM
To: Hamstead, Byron A <byron_hamstead @fws.gov>