960207_Permit Renewal Application 2019_20190410

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Animal Waste Management Systems
Request for Certification of Coverage
Facility Currently covered by an Expiring Sate Non -Discharge General Permit
On September 30, 2019, the North Carolina State Non -Discharge General Permits for Animal Waste Management Systems will
expire. As required by these permits, facilities that have been issued Certificates of Coverage to operate under these State
Non -Discharge General Permits must apply for renewal at least 180 days prior to their expiration date. Therefore, all applications
must be received by the Division of Water Resources by no later than April 3, 2019.
Please do not leave any question unanswered. Please verify all information and make any necessary corrections below.
Application must be signed and dated by the Permittee.
1. Farm Number: 96-0207
2. Facility Name: Langley Farms, Inc.
3. Landowner's Name (same as on the Waste Management Plan)
4. Landowner's Mailing Address: 260 Damon Dr
City: Princeton State:
Telephone Number: 919-222-8704 Ext. E-mail:
5• Facility's Physical Address: 260 Damon Dr
City: Princeton State:
6. County where Facility is located: Wayne
7. Farm Manager's Name (if different from Landowner):
g, Farm Manager's telephone number (include area code):
9. Integrator's Name (if there is not an Integrator, write "None"):
10. Operator Name (OIC): Danny R. Langley
Certificate Of Coverage Number: AWS960207
Danny Bryan Langley
NC Zip: 27569-7055
NC Zip: 275697055
11. Lessee's Name (if there is not a Lessee, write "None"): N Q�,
12. Indicate animal operation type and number:
Current Permit: Operations Type
Swine - Feeder to Finish
Oueration Types:
Swine
Cattle
Wean to Finish
Dairy Calf
Wean to Feeder
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Finish
Milk Cow
Feeder to Finish
Dry Cow
Farrow to Wean
Beef Stocker Calf
Farrow to Feeder
Beef Feeder
Boar/Stud
Beef Broad Cow
Gilts
Other
Other
Murphy -Brown LLC
Phone No.: 919-738-7881 OIC #: 19410
Allowable Count
4,340
Dry Poultry
Other Types
Non Laying Chickens
Horses - Horses
Laying Chickens
Horses - Other
Pullets
Sheep- Sheep
Turkeys
Sheep - Other
Turkey Pullet
Wet Poultry
Non Laying Pullet
Layers

13. Waste Treatment and Storage Lagoons (Verify the following information is accurate and complete. Make all necessary
corrections and provide missing data.)
Structure
Name
Estimated
Date
Built
Liner Type
(Clay, Synthetic,
Unknown)
Capacity
(Cubic Feet)
Estimated
Surface Area
(Square Feet)
Design Freeboard
'Redline"
(Inches)
DL 1
8/21/1993
C AL3�
1
49,222.00
19.00
DL 2
7/15/1994
67,518.00
19.00
Mail one (1) copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with this completed and signed application
as required by NC General Statutes 143-215.1OC(d) to the address below.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
1. The most recent Waste Utilization Plan (WUP), sinned b% the owner and a certified technical specialist, containing:
a. The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation, injection, etc.)
b. A map, of every field used for land application (for example: irrigation map)
c. The soil series present on every land application field
d. The crops grown on every land application field
e. The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP
f. The maximum PAN to be applied to every land application field
g. The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
h. The required NRCS Standard specifications
2. A site map/schematic
3. Emergency Action Plan
4. Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
5. Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
6. Mortality Control Checklist with selected method noted - Use the enclosed updated Mortality Control Checklist
7. Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.) Please be sure the above table is accurate and
complete. Also provide any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to
your facility.
8. Operation and Maintenance Plan
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal.
(e.g. composting, digesters, waste transfers, etc.)
As a second option to mailing paper copies of the application package, you can scan and email one signed copy of the
application and all the CAWMP items above to: [e-mail]

I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that,
if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not
included, this application package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-215.613, any person who knowingly makes any false statement,
representation, or certification in any application may be subject to civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation. (18 U.S.C.
Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both for
a similar offense.)
Printed Name of Signing Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all landowners should sign. If Landowner is a
corporation, signature should be by a principal executive officer of the corporation):
Name: - r Title a 40 OA y v
/ p
Signature: ,r., � , ` Date: 3 — „?n— ` /
Name: Title:
Signature: _ Date:
Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
FORM: RENEWAL -STATE GENERAL 02/2019

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
Division of. Water Resources (DWR) . 91Q 'Qg%— �q O I
Emergency Management System (EMS) Q la — 731— H 13
Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) jq 73W - goZ$ �.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) gig `? 3N $�
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,.
overflowing, or running off site. You should riot wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at
the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
a. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
1) Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
2) Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
3) Stop all flows to the. lagoon immediately.
4) Call a pumping contractor.
5) Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
b. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
1) Immediately stop waste application.
2) Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
3) Incorporate waste to reduce runoff..
4) Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
5) Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
c. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
1) Stop recycle pump.
2) Stop irrigation pump.
3) Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
4) Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
November 23, 2016

d. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
1) Stop recycle pump.
2) Stop irrigation pump.
3) Make sure no siphon occurs.
4) Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
5) Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
e. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks- possible action:
1) Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in
a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
2) If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes
and compact with a clay type soil.
3) Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as
soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?.
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWR regional office, phone number: qLIIA—
-',.� akfter hours, emergency number: 1-800-858-0368. Your phone call should
include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2
above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the
spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under
taken, and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS, phone number: q 19
Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
c. Contact the following for advice/technical assistance:
1) Cooperative Extension, phone number:
2 November 23, 2016

2) local SWCD office, phone number: ':�3 —So20
3) local NRCS office, phone number: Q IQ— �l Ll -5;
4. If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriff s Department and explain your problem
to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
damage.
a. Contractors Name: 4E64 e, "e, p�
b. Contractors Address: FP: n e u � 41-
c. Contractors Phone: QD 2 — gQ17
6. Contact the. technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting. Engineer,
etc.)
a. Name:
b. Phone:
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWR and technical assistance agencies to rectify
the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems
with release of wastes from happening again.
November 23, 2016

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause 13MPs to Control Insects Site Specific. Practices
Flush gutters Accumulation of solids '' Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
V Ito remove accumulated solids from gutters as
designed
O Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids
Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation
growth
Feeders
Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Maintain vegetative control along banks of
iagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
• Feed spillage &t Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
V ,(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage
Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7- to 10-
day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day interval
during winter)
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page 1

ROY COOPER
crs➢wmorr
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secrerwy
LINDA CULPEPPER
Dirccror
Danny Bryan Langley
Langley Farms, Inc.
260 Damon Dr
Princeton, NC 27569-7055
i�.
NORTH CAPOLINA
Environmental Quality
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring State General Permit
Dear Permittee:
.r•-
V3 .
t
r
fa
February 27, 2019
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation State Non -Discharge General Permits,
which expire on September 30, 2019. Copies of the new animal waste operation State Non -Discharge General Permits are available
at htt s:Hd .nc. ov/about/divisions/water-resources/water- ualit'-regional-o ierations/afo or by writing or calling:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
In order to assure Your continued coverage under the State Non -Discharge General Permits, you must submit an application for
permit coverage to the Division. Enclosed you will find a "Rey pest for Certificate of Coverage Facility Currently Covered by an
Expiring State Non -Discharge General Permit." The application form must be completed, signed and returned by April 3. 2019.
Please note that you must include one (11 copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with the
completed and signed application form. A list of items included in the CAWMP can be found on page 2 of the renewal
application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the State Non -Discharge General Permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feel
free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Branch staff at 919-707-9100.
Sincerely,
Jon Risgaard, Section Chief
Animal Feeding Operations and Groundwater Section
Enclosures
cc (w/o enclosures): Washington Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Wayne County Soil and Water Conservation District
AFOG Section Central Files - AWS960207
Murphy -Brown LLC
t N3rtt Csns+na Uagartmant .vi Ersvio<'€rnenta qua 't,,� � p:u,svr� �f 14'at4T Res�vr�es
r
' M N. Sa sbvn' St. l 1£S£ Ms. SerV9_- Center I RS:e'gh, North Carona 27£-19-1£3£

'Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause
BMMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage Accumulations of feed
Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues
immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
!
products)
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed stomp as needed
Animal holding areas Accumulations of animal 0
Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
wastes and feed wastage
and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal
®
Maintain fence rows and filter strips around .animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e.; inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed)
_
Dry manure handling • Accumulations of animal ®
Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
systems wastes
7- to 10-day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
®
Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
®
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page 2

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause ]BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Swine production I kyegetative or wooded buffers
gl�Recommended best management practices
Good judgment and common sense
Animal body • Dirty manure -covered Dry floors
surfaces animals
Floor surfaces Wet manure -covered floors Slotted floors
Waterers located over slotted floors
Feeders at high end of solid floors
❑ Scrape manure buildup from floors
❑ Underfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection • Urine Frequent manure removal by flush, pit recharge,
pits Partial microbial or scrape
decomposition Underfloor ventilation
Ventilation. exhaust Volatile gases Fan maintenance
fans • Dust Efficient air movement
Indoor surfaces • Dust 01-Washdown between groups of animals
❑ Feed additives
❑ Feeder covers
❑ Feed delivery downspout extenders to feeder
covers
Flush tanks • ~ Agitation of recycled lagoon
liquid while tanks are filling
Flush alleys • Agitation during wastewater
conveyance
A.MOC - November 11, 1996, page 1
❑ Flush tank covers
❑ Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
❑ Underfloor flush with underfloor ventilation

Swine Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
_ Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor - Site Specific Practices
Pit recharge points Agitation of recycled lagoon ❑ Extend recharge lines to near bottom of pits with
liquid while pits are filling anti -siphon vents
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank ❑ Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
Outside drain • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Box covers
collection or junction conveyance
boxes
End of drainpipes • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Extend'discharge point of pipes undemeath
at lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emissions kProper lagoon liquid capacity .
• Biological mixing ,Correct lagoon startup procedures
• Agitation ❑ Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio
❑ Minimum agitation when pumping
❑ Mechanical aeration
❑ Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles • Wind drift Minimum recommended operating pressure
Pum intake near lagoon liquid surface
p g q
Storage tank or • Partial microbial
basin surface decomposition
• Mixing while.filling
• Agitation when emptying
❑ Pump from second -stage lagoon
❑ Bottom or midlevel loading
❑ Tank covers
❑ Basin surface mats of solids
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 2

Swine, Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor
Settling basin surface
Manure, slurry, or
sludge spreader
outlets
Uncovered manure,
slurry, or sludge on
field surfaces
• Partial microbial
decomposition
• Mixing while filling
• Agitation when emptying
• Agitation when spreading
• Volatile gas emissions
Volatile gas emissions while
drying
~ Site S1 ecific, Practices
Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid level
0. Remove settled solids regularly
0. Soil injection of slurry/sludges
0 Wash residual manure from spreader after use
0 Proven biological additives or oxidants
0. Soil injection of slurry/sludges
0 Soil incorporation within 48 hours
0 Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
0 : Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition 0, Proper disposition of carcasses
Dead animal disposal • Carcass decomposition 0 Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits
pits
Incinerators • Incomplete combustion
Standing water • Improper drainage
around facilities . Microbial decomposition of
0 Proper location/construction of disposal pits
0 Secondary stack burners
Grade and landscape such that water drains away
from facilities
organic matter
Manure tracked onto • Poorly maintained access: Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access
AMOC November 11, 1996, page 3

Additional Information: Available From:
Swine Manure Management; .0200 Rule%BMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU— BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge— Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 128-88 NCSU— BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Flush Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 129-88 NCSU— BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83 NCSU— BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU— BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH-33 NCSU— Swine Extension
Environmental Assurance Program; NPPC Manual N.C. Pork Producers Assoc.
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force NCSU Agricultural Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 4

System Calibration
Information presented in manufacturer's charts are based on average, operation
conditions with relatively new equipment. Discharge rates and application rates change
over time as equipment gets older and components wear. In particular, pump wear
tends to reduce operating pressure and flow. With continued use, nozzle wear results in
an increase in the nozzle opening which will increase the discharge rate while
decreasing the wetted diameter.
You should be aware that operating the system differently than assumed in the design
will alter the application rate, diameter of coverage, and subsequently the application
uniformity. For example, operating the system with excessive pressure results in smaller
.droplets, greater potential for drift, and accelerates wear of the sprinkler nozzle.
Clogging of nozzles can result in pressure increase. Plugged intakes or crystallization of
mainlines will reduce operating. pressure. Operating below design pressure greatly
reduces the coverage diameter and application uniformity.'
For the above reason, you should calibrate your equipment on a regular basis to ensure
proper application rates and uniformity. Calibration at least once every three years is
recommended. Calibration involves collecting and measuring flow at several locations in
the application area. Any number of containers can be used to collect flow and
determine the application rate. Rain gauges work best because they already have a
graduated scale from which to read the application amount without having to perform
additional calculations. However, pans, plastic buckets, jars, or anything with a uniform
opening and cross-section can be used provided the liquid collected can be easily
transferred to a scaled container for measuring.
For stationary sprinklers, collection containers should be located randomly throughout
the application area at several distances from sprinklers. For traveling guns, sprinklers
should be located along a transect perpendicular to the direction of pull. Set out
collection containers 25 feet apart along the transect on both sides of the gun cart. You
should compute the average application rate for all nonuniformity of the application: On
a windless day, variation between containers of more than 30 percent is cause for
concern. You should contact your irrigation dealer or technical specialist for assistance.
*Reprinted for Certification Training for Operations of Anima! Waste Management Systems Manua!

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE PLAN
Proper lagoon management should be a year-round priority. It is especially important to manage
levels so that you do not have problems during extended rainy and wet periods.
Maximum storage capacity should be available in the lagoon for periods when the receiving crop is
dormant (such as wintertime for bermudagrass) or when there are extended rainy spells such as a
thunderstorm season in the summertime. This means that at the first sign of plant growth in the
later winter 1 early spring, irrigation according to a farm waste management plan should be done
whenever the land in dry enough to receive lagoon liquid. This will make storage space available
in the lagoon for future wet periods. In the late summer 1 early fall the lagoon should be pumped
down to the low marker (see Figure 2-1) to allow for winter storage. Every effort should be made
to maintain the lagoon close to the minimum liquid level as long as the weather and waste
utilization plan will allow it.
Waiting until the lagoon has reached its maximum storage capacity before starting to irrigated does
not leave room for storing excess water during extended wet periods. Overflow from the lagoon for
any reason except a 25-year, 24-hour storm is a violation of state law and subject to penalty
action.
The routine maintenance of a lagoon involves the following:
Maintenance of a vegetative cover for the dam. Fescue or common bermudagrass
are the most common vegetative covers. The vegetation should be fertilized each
year, if needed, to maintain a vigorous stand. -The amount of fertilized applied
should be based on a soils test, but in the event that it is not practical to obtain a
soils test each year, the lagoon embankment and surrounding areas should be
fertilized with 800 pounds per acre of 10-10-10, or equivalent.
Brush and trees on the embankment must be controlled. This may be done by
mowing, spraying, grazing, chopping., or a combination of these practices. This
should be done at least once a year and possibly twice in years that weather
conditions are favorable for heavy vegetative growth.
NOTE: If vegetation is controlled by spraying, the herbicide must not, be allowed to enter the
lagoon water. Such chemicals could harm the bacteria in the lagoon that are treating the waste.
Maintenance inspections of the entire lagoon should be made during the initial filling of the lagoon
and at least monthly and after major rainfall and storm events. Items to be checked should
include, as a minimum, the following:
Waste Inlet Pipes, Recycling Pipes, and Overflow Pipes -- look for:
1. separation of joints .
2. cracks or breaks
3. accumulation of salts or minerals
4. overall condition of pipes

Lagoon surface -- look for:
1. undesirable vegetative growth
2. floating or lodged debris
Embankment -- look for:
1. settlement, cracking, or "jug" holes
2. side slope stability -- slumps or bulges
3. wet or damp areas on the back slope
4.. erosion due to lack or vegetation or as a result of wave action
6. rodent damage
Larger lagoons may be subject to liner damage due to wave action caused by strong
winds. These waves can erode the lagoon sidewalls, thereby weakening the lagoon
dam. A good stand of vegetation will reduce the potential damage caused by wave
action. if wave action. causes serious damage to- a lagoon sidewall, baffles in the lagoon
maybe used to reduce the wave impacts.
Any of these features could lead to erosion and weakening of the dam. If your lagoon
has any of these features, you should call an appropriate expert familiar with design and
construction of waste lagoons. You may need to provide a temporary fix if there is a
threat of a waste discharge. However, a permanent solution should be reviewed by the
technical expert. Any digging into a lagoon dam with heavy equipment is a serious
undertaking with potentially serious consequences and should not be conducted unless
recommended by an appropriate technical expert.
Transfer Pumps -- check for proper operation of:
1. recycling pumps
2. irrigation pumps
Check for leaks, loose fittings, and overall pump operation. An unusually loud or grinding
noise, or a large amount of vibration, may indicate that the pump is in need of repair or
replacement.
NOTE: Pumping systems should be inspected and operated frequently enough so that
you are not completely "surprised" by equipment- failure. You should perform your
pumping system maintenance at a time when your lagoon is at its low level. This will
allow some safety time should major repairs be required. Having a nearly full lagoon is
not the time to think about switching, repairing, or borrowing pumps. Probably, if your
lagoon is full, your neighbor's lagoon is full also. You should consider maintaining an
inventory of spare parts or pumps.
• Surface water diversion features are designed to carry all surface drainage
waters (such as rainfall runoff, roof drainage, gutter outlets, and parking lot
runoff) away from your lagoon and other waste treatment or storage
structures. The only water that should be coming from your lagoon is that
which comes from your flushing (washing) system pipes and the rainfall that
hits the lagoon directly. You should inspect your diversion system for the
following:
1. adequate vegetation
2. diversion capacity
1 ridge berm height

Identified problems should be corrected promptly. It is advisable to inspect your system
during or immediately following a heavy rain. If technical assistance is needed to
determine proper solutions, consult with appropriate experts.
You should record the level of the lagoon just prior to when rain is predicted, and then
record the level again 4 to 6 hours after the rain (assumes there is no pumping). This will
give you an idea of how much your lagoon level will rise with a certain rainfall amount
(you must also be recording your rainfall for this to work). Knowing this should help in
planning irrigation applications and storage. If your lagoon rises excessively, you may
have an overflow problem from a surface water diversion or there may be seepage into
the lagoon from the surrounding land.
Lagoon Operation
Startup:
1. Immediately after construction establish a complete sod cover on bare soil
surfaces to avoid erosion.
2. Fill new lagoon design treatment volume at least half full of water before waste
loading begins, taking care not to erode lining or bank slopes.
3. Drainpipes into the lagoon should have a flexible pipe extender on the end of the
pipe to discharge near the bottom of the lagoon during initial filling or another
means of slowing the incoming water to avoid erosion of the lining.
4. When possible, begin loading new lagoons in the spring to maximize bacterial
establishment (due to warmer weather).
5. It is recommended that a new lagoon be seeded withsludge from a healthy
working swine lagoon in the amount of 0.25 percent of the full lagoon liquid
volume. This seeding should occur at least two weeks prior to the addition of
wastewater.
6. Maintain a periodic check on the lagoon liquid pH. If the pH falls below 7.0, add
agricultural lime at the rate of 1 pound per 1000 cubic feet of lagoon liquid volume
until the pH rises above 7.0. Optimum lagoon liquid pH is between 7.5 and 8.0.
7. A dark color, lack of bubbling, and excessive odor signals inadequate biological
activity. Consultation with a technical specialist is recommended if these
conditions occur for prolonged periods, especially during the warm season.
Loading:
The more frequently and regularly that wastewater is added to a lagoon, the better the
lagoon will function. Flush systems that wash waste into the lagoon several times daily
are optimum for treatment. Pit recharge systems, in which one or more buildings are
drained and recharged each day, also work well.

• Practice water conservation -- minimize building water usage and spillage from
leaking waterers, broken pipes and washdown through proper maintenance and
water conservation.
• Minimize feed wastage and spillage by keeping feeders adjusted. This will reduce
-the amount of solids entering the lagoon.
Management:
• Maintain lagoon liquid level between the permanent storage level and the full
temporary storage level.
• Place visiblemarkers or stakes on the lagoon bank to show the minimum liquid level
and the maximum liquid level. (Figure 2-1).
• Start irrigating at the earliest possible date in the spring based on nutrient
requirements and soil moisture so that temporary storage will be maximized for the
summer thunderstorm season. Similarly, irrigate in the late summer I early fall to
provide maximum lagoon storage for the winter.
• The lagoon liquid level should never be closer than 1 foot to the lowest point of the
dam or embankment.
• Don not pump the lagoon liquid level lower than the permanent storage level unless
you are removing sludge.
• Locate float pump intakes approximately 18 inches underneath the liquid surface and
as far away from the drainpipe inlets as possible.
• Prevent additions of bedding materials, long-stemmed forage or vegetation, molded
feed, plastic syringes, or other foreign materials into the lagoon.
• Frequently remove solids from catch basins at end of confinement houses or
wherever they are installed.
• Maintain strict vegetation, rodent, and varmint control near lagoon edges.
• Do not allow trees or large bushes to grow on lagoon dam or embankment.
• Remove sludge from the lagoon either when the sludge storage capacity is full or
before it fills 50 percent of the permanent storage volume.
• If animal production is to be terminated, the owner Is responsible for obtaining and
-implementing a closure plan to eliminate the possibility of a pollutant discharge.
Sludge Removal:
Rate of lagoon sludge buildup can be reduced by:
E

• proper lagoon sizing,
• mechanical solids separation of flushed waste,
• gravity settling of flushed waste solids in an appropriately designed basin, or
• minimizing feed wastage and spillage.
Lagoon sludge that is removed annually rather than stored long term will:
• have more nutrients,
• have more odor, and
• require more land to properly use the nutrients.
Removal techniques;
• Hire a custom applicator.
• Mix the sludge and lagoon liquid with a chopper - agitator impeller pump through large
- bore sprinkler irrigation system onto nearby cropland; and soil incorporate.
• Dewater the upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby cropland or forageland; mix
remaining sludge; pump into liquid sludge applicator; haul and spread onto cropland or
forageland; and soil incorporate.
• Dewater the upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby cropland or forageland;
dredge sludge from lagoon with dragline or sludge barge; berm an area beside lagoon
to receive the sludge so that liquids can drain back into lagoon; allow sludge to
dewater; haul and spread with manure spreader onto cropland or forageland; and soil
incorporate.
Regardless of the method, you must have the sludge material analyzed for waste
constituents just as you would your lagoon water. The sludge will contain different
nutrient and metal values from the liquid. The application of the sludge to fields will be
limited by these nutrients as well as any previous waste applications to that field and
crop requirement. Waste application rates will be discussed in detail in Chapter 3.
When removing sludge, you must also pay attention to the liner to prevent damage.
Close attention by the pumper or drag -line operator will ensure that the lagoon liner
remains intact. If you see soil material or the synthetic liner material being disturbed, you
should stop the activity immediately and not resume until you are sure that the sludge
can be removed without liner injury. If the liner is damaged it must be repaired as soon
as possible.
Sludge removed from the lagoon has a much higher phosphorus and heavy metal
content than liquid. ' Because of this it should probably be applied to land with low
phosphorus and metal levels, as indicated by a soil test, and incorporated to reduce the
chance of erosion. Note that if the sludge is applied to fields with very high soil -test
phosphors, it should be applied only at rates equal to the crop removal of phosphorus.
As with other wastes, always have your lagoon sludge analyzed for its nutrient value.

The application of sludge will increase the amount of odor at the waste application site.
Extra precaution should be used to observe the wind direction and' other conditions
which could increase the concern of neighbors.
Possible .Causes of lagoon Failure
Lagoon failures_ result in the unplanned discharge of wastewater from the structure.
Types of failures include leakage through the bottom or sides, overtopping; and breach
of the dam. Assuming proper design and construction, the owner has the responsibility
for ensuring structure safety. Items which may lead to lagoon failures include:
• Modification of the lagoon structure -- an example is the placement of a pipe in the
dam without proper design and construction. (Consult an expert in lagoon design
before placing any pipes in dams.)
• Lagoon liquid levels -- high levels are a safety risk:
• Failure to inspect and maintain the dam.
• Excess surface water flowing into the lagoon.
• Liner integrity -- protect from inlet pipe scouring, damage during sludge removal, or
rupture from lowering.lagoon liquid level below groundwater table.
NOTE: If lagoon water is allowed to overtop the dam, the moving water will soon cause
gullies to form in the dam. Once this damage starts, it can quickly cause a large
discharge of.wastewater and possible dam failure.

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Langley Farm Inc
D. Bryan Langley
260 Damon Drive
Princeton, NC 27569
919-936-7364
09-19-2016
This plan has been developed by:
Katie Stevens
NRCSMW ne SWCD
208 West Chestnut St.
Goldsboro, NC 2 753 0
919-734-5281 Ext. 3
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
O
I (we).understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
A-
Plan Approved B�`'� q/j
Pp y
Technical Spe iali Signature Date
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-19-2016 Cover Page I

Narrative
Buffers are shown on the irrigation pull map. 200' from the nearest residences, 100' from wells, and the
required setbacks from power lines. These acers have been subtracted from the honey Wagon available
acres.
Preview Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-20-2016 Narrative Page 1 of 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 4,023,180 gals/year by a 4,340
animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste
storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
7252
Incorporated
8702
Injected
8702
Irrigated
7252
M&x. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
7,252
12593
-5,341
6,986,398
-2,963,218
Year 2
7,252
10973
-3,721
6,087,671
-2,064,491
Note: In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
* Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
949071 Database Version 4.1' Date Printed: 09-19-2016 Source Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary ofthe crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic
Yield estimates are also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI)
and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the
harvested plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT
Rating should receive no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be
recommended in accordance with North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of
P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
RatingRemoval
LI
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P205
obs/acre)
Applied
(lbs/acre)
9323
Pi
39.74
2.40
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
N/A
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Sorghum, Grain
55 C
41
N/A
9323
P2
38.74
3.8 11
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
N/A
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tonsl
15
N/A
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT41
N/A
9323
P3
38.74
3.581
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
N/A
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT41
N/A
9323
P4
38.74
3.53
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
N/A
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT.
41
N/A
9323
P5
38.74
3.95
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double. Crop
35 bu.
28
N/A
Small Grain Overseed-
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
41
N/A
9323
P6
38.74
3.38
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
- 27
N/A
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Sorghum, Grain
54 CWT41
N/A
9323
P7
38.74
2.84
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
27
N/A
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed 9/19/2016
PCs Page 1 of 3
NOTE: Symbol'* means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rating
LI
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE 1
P205
Removal
(Ibslacre)
Applied
(lbslacre)
Sorghum, Grain
54 CW-I'
41.
N/A
9323
P8
1 38.74
1.171
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
27
N/A
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Sorghum, Grain
54 CWT
41
N/A
9323
P9
1 32.16
0.591
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
27
N/A
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Sorghum, Grain
54 CWT
41
N/A
9323
P10.
32.1q
1.54
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
NIA
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
41
NIA
9323
PH
32.16
2.98
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
N/A
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
41
N/A
9323
P12
32.16
3.06
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
N/A
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
41
N/A
9323
P13
32.16
3.14
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
N/A
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
41
N/A
9323
P14
32.16
3.23
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
NIA
Soybeans. Manured, Double Crop
3s bu.
28
N/A
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
41
NIA
9323
P15
3216
2.29
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
N/A
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
NIA
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
41
NiA
9323
HW 1
32.62
7.97
Low
N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
NIA
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
N/A
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Toni
15
N/A
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed 9/19/2016
PCs Page 2 of 3
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rating
Ll
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P205
Removal
(ibs/acre)
Applied
I (lbs/acre).
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
41
N/A
9323
RW 3
1 27.96
11.13
Low
-N/A
Norfolk
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
30
N/A
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
28
N/A
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
15
N/A
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWTI
41
N/A
PLAN TOTALS: 595.62 60.59
;7echnaca1411
'
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
<= 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve ,
uLrient leaching below the root zone.
the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
V.
PL�4filndex
v.
Ratang
PM 4-ag$meritRecommendation ' b
spa ff
0 - 25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
25 - 50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
> 100
Very High
Starter P application only
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed 9/19/2016
PCs Page 3 of 3
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields ofthe crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by.manure or
other by-products, commercialfertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate ofthe quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste
Utilization
Table
Source
Total
Use.
Year 1
Applic.
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
Comm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(ibs/A)
Applic.
Tract
Field
ID
Soil Series
Acres
Acres
Crop
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
9323
PI
S7
orfolk
38.74
2.40
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/14/30
125
0
0
brig.
9323
Pi
S7
Norfolk
38.74
2.40
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
9323
Pi
S7
Norfolk
38.74
2.40
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
20
Irrig.
9323
P2
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.81
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
9323
P2
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.81
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
9323
P2
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.81
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
20
Inig.
9323
P3
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.58
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
9323
P3
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.58
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9115
137
0
0
brig.
9323
P3 I
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.58
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
20
Irrig.
9323
P4
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.53
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
9323
P4
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.53
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
9323
P4
S7
]Norfolk
38.74
3.53
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31 1
50
0 1
20
Irrig.
9323
P5
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.95
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
9323
PS
-S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.95
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
9323
P5
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.95
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
20
brig.
9323
P6
tS7
Norfolk
38.74
3.38
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
911-4/30
123
0
0
brig.
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2016
Manure
PA .
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
1000
N
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
63
34.67
0.00
83.22
0.00
137
76.01
0.00
182.41
0.00
9
4.99
0.00
11.98
0.00
63
34.67
0.00
132.11
0.00
137
76.01
0.00
289.58
0.00
9
4.99
0.00
19.02
0.00
63
34.67
0.00
124.13
0.00
137
76.01
0.00
272.10
0.00
9
4.99
0.00
17.88
0.00
63
34.67
0.00
122.40
0.0
137
76.01
0.00
268.30
0.00
9
4.99
0.00
17.63
0.00
63
34.67
0.00
136.96
0.00
137
76.01
0.00
300.22
0.0
9
4.99
0.00
19.72
0.00
62
34.12
0.00
115.32
0.00
WUT Page 1 of 6

Waste Utilization Table
Vpar 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Cantu
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
Obs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(ibs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
9323
P6
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.38
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9/15
133
0
0
Irrig.
133
73.79
U.00
249.40
0.00
9323
P6
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.38
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
20
Irrig..
9
4.99
0.00
16.88
0.00
9323
P7
S7
Norfolk
38.74
2.84
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30
1 123
0
0
Irrig..
62
34.12
0.00
96.90
0.00
9323
P7
S7
Norfolk
38.74
2.84
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9/15
133
0
0
Irrig.
133
73.79
0.00
209.55
0.00
9323
P7
S7
Norfolk
38.74
2.84
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
20
Irrig.
9
4.99
0.60
14.18
0.00
9323
P8
S7
Norfolk
38.74
1.17
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30
123
0
0
Irrig.
62
34.12
0.00
39.92
0.00
9323
P8
S7
Norfolk
38.74
1.17
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9/15
133
0
0
Irrig.
133
73.79
0.00
86.33
0.00
9323
P8
S7
Norfolk
38.74
1.17
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
20
Irrig.
9
4.99
0.00
5.84
0.00
9323
P9
S7
Norfolk
32.16
0.59
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30
123
0
0
Irrig.
62
34.12
0.00
20.13
0.00
9323
P9
87
Norfolk
32.16
0.59
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
34 bu.
4/1-9/15
133
0
0
Irrig.
133
73.79
0.00
43.53
0.00
9323
P9
S7
Norfolk
32.16
0.59
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
20
Irrig.
9
4.99
0.00
2.95
0.00
9323
P10
S7
Norfolk
32.16
1.54
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
34.67
0.05
53.40
0.00
9323
P10
S7
Norfolk
32.16
1.54
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
137
76.01
0.00
117.05
0.00
9323
P10
S7
Norfolk
32.16
1.54
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
20
Irrig.
9
4.99
0.00
7.69
0.00
9323
PH
S7
Norfolk
32.16
2.98
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
34.67
0.00
103.33
0.00
9323
PH
S7
Norfolk
32.16
2.98
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
137
76.01'
0.00
226.49
0.00
9323
Pi l
S7
Norfolk
32.16
2.98
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
20
Irrig.
9
4.99
0.00
14.88
OM
9323
P12
S7 INorfolk
32.16
3.06
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4130
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
34.67
0.00
106.10
0.00
9323
P12
S7
Norfolk
32.16
3.06
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.E
16.01
0.00
232.58
0.00
9323
P12
S7
Norfolk
3116
3.06
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
20
Irrig.
4.99
0.00
15.28
0.00
9323
P13
S7
Norfolk
32.16
3.14
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.34.67
0.00
108.88
0.009323
P13
S7
Norfolk
32.16
3.14
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
76.01
0.00
238.66
0.0o
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2016 WUT Page 2 of 6

Waste Utilization Table
Source
Total
Use.
Year 1
Applic.
Nitrogen Comm
PA ' Fert.
Nutrient Nutrient
Req'd Applied
Obs/A) (ibs/A)
Res,
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Manure Liquid Solid
PA ManureA Manure
Nutrient pplied Applied
Applied (acre) (acre)
Obs/A)
1000
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Mangy
Applied
(Field)
Tract
Field
1 ID
Soil Series
Acres
Acres Crop
RYE
Period
N
N
N
Method
N gal/A Tons
1000 gals
tons
9323
P13
I S7
Norfolk
32.16
3.14 Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
20
Irrig.
9 4.99 0.00
15.68
0.00
9323
P14
S7
Norfolk
32.16
3.23 Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
brig.
63 34.67 0.00
112.00
0.00
9323
P14
S7
Norfolk
32.161
3.23 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1=9/15
137
0
0
brig.
137 76.01 0.00
245.501
0.00
9323
P14
S7
Norfolk
.32.16
3.23 Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
20
brig.
9 4.99 0.00
16.13
0.00
9323
P15
S7
Norfolk
32.16
2.29 Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irri&
63 34.67 0.00
79.40
0.00
9323
P15
S7
Norfolk
32.16
2.29 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
137 76.01 0.00
174.051
0.00
9323
P15
87
INorfolk
32.16
2.29 Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
20
Irrig.
9 4.99 0.00
11.43
0.00
9323
1 HW 1
S•7
Norfolk
32.62
7.97 Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
brig.
63 34.67 0.00
276.35
0.00
9323
HW 1
S7
Norfolk
32.62
7.97 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
137 76.01 0.00
605.76
0.0
9323
HW 1
S7
Norfolk
32.62
7.97 Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
20
Irrig.
9 4.99 0.00
39.79
0.00
9323
HW 3
S7
Norfolk
27.96
11.13 Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63 34.67 0.00
385.92
0.00
9323
HW 3
i S7
Norfolk
27.96
11.13 Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
35 bu.
4/1-9/15
137
0
0
Irrig.
137 76.01 0.00
845.93
0.00
9323
HW 3
S7
Norfolk
27.96
1 1.13Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
20
brig.
9 4.99 0.00
55.57
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
6,986.40
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
4,023.18
.. ;::•, ;.
Balance, 1000 gallons
-2,963.22
J;,
• i.
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, ions
0.00
Notes:
1. In the tract column, - symbol
means leased, otherwise, owned.
2. Symbol * means user entered'data.
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2016 WUT Page 3 of 6

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
1D
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
Comm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Obs/A)
Res.
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tans
1000 gals
tons
9323
Pi
S7
Norfolk
38.74
2.40
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
34.67
0.0(1183.22
0.00
9323
Pi
S7
Norfolk
38.74
2.40
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
21
11.65
0.00
27.96
0.00
9323
Pi
S7
Norfolk
38.74
2.40
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
3/15-8/31
98
0
0
brig.
98
54.37
0.00
130.48
0.00
9323
P2
S7
INorfolk
38.74
3.81
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
34.67
0.00
132.11
0.00
9323
P2
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.81
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
21
11.65
0.00
44.39
0.00
9323
P2
S7
Norfolk
38.741
3.81
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
3/15-8/31
98
0
0
brig.
98
54.37
0.00
207.14
0.0
9323
P3
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.58
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
34.671
0.00
124.13
0.0
9323
P3
S7
INofolk
38.74
3.58
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
brig.
21
11.65
0.00
41.71
0.00
9323
P3
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.58
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
3/15-8/31
98
0
0
Irrig.
98
54.37
0.00
194.64
0.00
9323
P4
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.53
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
34.67
0.00
122.40
0.00
9323
P4
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.53
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
21
11.65
0.00
41.13
0.00
9323
P4
S7.
Norfolk
38.74
3.53
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
3/15-8/31
98
0
0
Irrig.
98
54.37
0.00
191.92
0.00
9323
_P5
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.95
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30.
125
0
0
brig.
63
34.67
0.00
136.96
0.00
9323
P5
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.95
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
21
11.65
0.00
46.02
0.00
9323
P5
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.95
Sorghum; Grain
55 CWT
3/15-8/31
98
0
0
brig.
98
54.371
0.00
214.76
0.00
9323
P6
S7
orfolk
38.74
3.38
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30
123
0
0
brig.
62
34.12
0.00
115.32
0.00
9323
P6
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.38
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
21
11.65
0.00
39.38
0.00
9323
P6
S7
Norfolk
38.74
3.38
Sorghum, Grain
54 CWT
3/15-8/31
96
0
0
Irrig.
96
53.26
0.00
180.02
0.00
9323
P7
S7
Norfolk
38.74
2.84
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
911-4/30
123
0
0
Irrig..
62
34.12
0.00
96.90
0.00
9323
P7
S7 INorfolk
38.74
2.84
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
21
11.65
0.00
33.09
0.00
9323
P7
S7
Norfolk
38.74
2.84
Sorghum, Grain
54 CWT
3/15-8/31
96
0
0
Irrig.
96
53.26
0.00
151.26
0.00
9323
P8
S7
Norfolk
38.74
1.17
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4/30 1
123
0
0
Irrig.
62
34.12
0.00
39.92
0.00
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2016 WUT Page 4 of 6

Waste Utilization Table
VPAr 7
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
pbs/A)
Comm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
9323
,P8
S7
Norfolk
38.74
1.17
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
21
11.65
0.00
13.63
0.00
9323
P8
S7
Norfolk
38.74
1.17
Sorghum, Grain
54 CWT
3/15-8/31
96
0
0
brig.
96
53.26
0.00
62.31
0.00
9323
P9
S7
Norfolk
32.16
0.59
Wheat, Grain
59 bu.
9/1-4130
1 123
0
0
Irrig.
62
34.12
0.00
20.13
0.00
9323
P9
S7
INorfolk
32.16
0.59
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig:
21
11.65
0.00
6.87
0.0
9323
P9
S7
Norfolk
32.16
0.59
Sorghum, Grain
54 CWT
3/15-8/31
96
0
0
Irrig.
96
53.26
0.00
31.42
0.00
9323
PIO
S7
Norfolk
32.16
1.54
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
34.67
0.00
53.40
0.00
9323
P10
S7
Norfolk
32.16
1.54
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
21
11.65
0.00
17.94
0.00
9323
P10
S7
INorfalk
32.16
1.5.4
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
3/15-8/31
98
0
0
Irrig.
98
54.37
0.00
83.73
0.00
9323
PH
S7
Norfolk
32.16
2.98
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
34.67
0.00
103.33
0.00
9323
Pl1
S7
Norfolk
32.16
2.98
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
21
11.65
0.00
34.72
0.00
9323
Pl1
S7
-Norfolk
32.16
2.98
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
3/15-8/31
98
0
0
Irrig.
98
54.37
0.00
162.02
0.00
9323
P12
S7
INorfolk
32.16
3.06
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
34.67
0.00
106.10
0.00
9323
P12
S7
Norfolk
32.16
3.06
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
21
11.65
0.00
35.65
0.00
9323
P12
S7
Norfolk
32.16
3.06
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
3/15-8/31
98
0
0
Irrig.
98
54.37
0.00
- 166.37
-0.00
9323
P13
S7
Norfolk
32.16
3.14
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
34.67
0.00
108.88
0.00
9323
P13
S7
Norfolk
32.16
3.14
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
21
11.65
0.00
36.58
0.0
9323
P13
S7[Norfolk
32.16
3.14
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
3/15-8/31
98
0
0
Irrig.
98
54.37
0.00
170.72
0.00
9323
P14
S7
Norfolk
32.16
3.23
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
brig.
63
34.67
0.00
112.00
0.00
9323
P14
S7
Norfolk
32.16
3.23
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
21
11.65
0.00
37.63
0.00
9323 1
P14
S7
Norfolk
32.16
3.23
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
N15-8/31
98
0
0
Irrig.
98
54.37
0.00
175.61
0.00
9323
P15
S7
Norfolk 1
32.16
2.29
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
brig.
63
34.67
0.00
79.40
0.00
9323
P15
S7 INorfolk
32.16
2.29
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
21
11.65
0.00
26.68
0.00
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed; 9/19/2016 WUT Page 5 of 6

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureAi
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure .
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
9323
P15
ST
Norfolk
32.16
2.29
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
3/15-8/31
98
0
0
Irrig.
98
54.37
0.00
124.50
0.00
9323
HW 1
S7
Norfolk
32.62
7.97
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
Irrig.
63
34.67
0.00
276.35
0.00
9323
HW 1
S7
Norfolk
32.62
7.97
Small.Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
21
11.65
0.00
92.85
0.00
9323
HW 1
S7
Norfolk
32.62
7.97
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
3/15-8/31
98
0
0
Irrig.
98
54.37
0.00
433.32
0.00
9323
HW 3
S7
Norfolk
27.96
11.13
Wheat, Grain
60 bu.
9/1-4/30
125
0
0
brig.
63
34.67
0.00
385.92
0.00
9323
HW 3
S7
Norfolk
27.96
11.13
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
21
11.65
0.00
129.67
0.00
9323
HW 3
I S7
orfolk
27.96
11.13
Sorghum, Grain
55 CWT
3115-8/31
98
0
0
brig.
98
54.37
0.00
605.121
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
6,087 67
br „w, 6
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
4,023.18
.Balance, 1000 gallons
-2,064.49
E
Total Applied, tops
0.00
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tons
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data.
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2016 WUT Page 6 of 6

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies
with soils. if applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must apply at a rate that will not result in
runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to
receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application amount that each field may receive in any one application
event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
9323
Pi
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
9323
P2
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
9323
P3
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
9323
P4
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
9323
P5
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
9323
P6
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
9323
P7
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
9323
P8
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
9323
P9
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
9323
P10
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
9323
PH
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
9323
P12
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
9323
P13
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
9323
P14
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
9323
P15
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
9323
HW 1
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
9323
HW 3
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed 9/19/2016 1AF Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary ofthe nutrient
management plan developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops
for each year of the plan. Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements and soil test results. The quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity
of other nutrients applied may exceed their required- amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other
byproducts are utilized to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the
application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of
this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations, additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources
may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
0
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
9323
Pi
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres App.
Period
2.40
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
]
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
60 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
125
97
576
21
1
4
1
0
P Removal
Rating
30 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
97
576
21
1
4
1
-1
Tract I Field
9323
P2
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres I App.
Period
3.81
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ple Date
60 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
125
97
576
21
1
4
1
0
Rating
R
30 lbs/ac.
[-m
BALANCE.
0
97
576
21
1
4
1
-1
Field
9323
P3
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
. Period
3.58
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ple Date
60 bu.
07-21716
Manure
125
97
576
21
1
4
1
0
Rating
30 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
97
576
21
1
4
1
-1
EA
Field
9323
P4
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
p. Period
3.53
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheats Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
60 W.
1 07-21-16
Manure
125
97
5761
21
1
14
1
0
P Removal
Rating
30 lbs/ac.
ow
I BALANCE
0
971
5761
211
1
41
1
-1
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2016 NUR Page 1 of 15

Nutrient
Management Recommendations
Test
YEAR
Q
N
P205
K20
Mg
Mn
Zn
Cu
Lime
(Ibs/A)
(lbs/A)
(Ibs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(Ibs/A)
(lbs/A)
(tons/A)
Tract Field
9323 P5
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres App. Period
3.95 9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
a
_
-
V
-
-
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ple Date
60 bu. 07-21-16
Manure
125
97
576
21
1
4
1
0
Rating
RA
301bs/ac. Low
BALANCE
0
97
576
21
1
4
1
-1
Field
9323 P6
Req'd Nutrients
123
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
. Period
3.38 9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
59 bu. 1 07-21-16
Manure
123
95
566
21
1
4
1
0
P Removal I Rating
30 lbs/ac. Low
BALANCE
0
95
566
21
1
4
1
-1
Tract I Field
9323 P7
Req'd Nutrients
123
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres I App. Period
2.84 9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
59 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
123
95
566
21
1
4
11
0
P Removal
Rating
30 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
95
566
21
1
4
1
-1
Tract
Field
9323
P8
Req'd Nutrients
123
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres App.
Period
1.17
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ple Date
59 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
123
.95
566
21
1
4
1
0
P
Rating
30 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
95
566
21
1
4
1
-1
Field
9323
P9
Req'd Nutrients
123
0
50
0
0
0
0
1
p. Period
0.59
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
PP_.
:. -_ ---
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Series
ldorfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LSoil
RYE Sample Date
59 bu. 07-21-16
Manure
123
95
566
21
1
4
1
0
moval
Rating 1
30 lbs/ac. ow
BALANCE
0
951
5161
211
1
4
1
1
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2016 NMR Page 2 of 15

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
0
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(Ibs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(Ibs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
9323
P10
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
50
0
0
0
0
1
Acres
App. Period
1.54
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
I
Residual
0
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
ple Date
60 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
125
97
576
21
1
4
1
0
E
l Rating
30 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
97
526
21
1
4
1
-1
Field
9323
Pl1
Req'd Nutrients
125
0.
50
0
0
0
0
1
p. Period
2.98
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
.0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
60 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
125
97
576
21
1
4
1
0
P Removal
Rating
301bs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
97
526
21
1
4
1
-1
Tract
Field
9323
P12
Req'd Nutrients
f'_5
r�
0
0
0
f�
1
Acres App.
Period
3.06
9/1-4/30
Supplied 13y:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
n
n
0
0
c�
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ple Date
60 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
125
97
576
21
1
4
1
0
Rating
Bip.
30 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
97
526
21
1
4
1
-1
Field
9323
P13
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
50
0
0
0
0
1
Period
3.1.4
9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ple Date
60 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
125
97
576
21
1
4
1
0
EA
Rating
30lbs/ac:
Low'
BALANCE
0
97
526
21
1
4
1
-1
Field
9323
P14
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
50
0
0
0
0
1
p. Period
3.23
9/1-4/30 'Supplied
By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Staler
0
0
0
(1
(
0
i
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
60 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
125
97
576
21
1
4
1
0
P Removal Rating
30 lbs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
0
97
526
21
1
4
1
-1
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2016 NMR Page 3 of 15

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
0
N.
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
9323 P15
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
50
0
0
0
0
1
Acres. App. Period
2.29 9/1-4/30
Supplied By:
u `
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
60 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
125
97
576
211
1
4
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
30 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
97
526
21
1
4
1
-1
Tract
I Field
9323
HW 1
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Acres App.
Period
7.97
9/1-4/30
Supplied`By:
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
01
0
0
.0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ple Date
60 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
125
97
576
21
1
4
1
0
E
Rating
301bs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
97
576
21
1
4
1Field
9323
HW3
Req'd Nutrients
125
0
50
0
0
0
0
1
p. Period
11.13
9/1-4/30
Supplied By;
CROP
Wheat, Grain
Starter
0
0
Cr
0
0
0
t
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
60 bu.
1 07-21-16
Manure
125
97
576
21
1
4
1
0
P Removal
Rating
30 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
97
526
21
1
4
1
-1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2016 14MR Page 4 of 15

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(Ibs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(Ibs/A)
Cu
(Ibs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
TField
9323
1 PI
Req'd Nutrients
1371
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
2.40
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double -Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
35 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
137
106
631
23
1
4
1
0
P Removal Rating
28 lbs/ac.
l ow
BALANCE
0
106
631
23
1
1 4
1
0
Tract
I Field
9323
Pl.
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
2.40
10/1-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
07-21-16
Manure
30
23
138
5
0
1
0
0
P Removal Rating
151bs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
23
138
5
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
9323
P2
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
3.81
10/1-3/31
Supplied 13y:
,
m
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
01
.0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
07-21-16
Manure
30
23
138
5
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
15 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
23
138
5
0
1
0
0
Tract
I Field
9323
P2
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
3.81
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ple Date
35 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
137
106
631
23
1
4
1
0
EA
l Rating
281bs/ac.
C.ow
BALANCE
0
106
631
23
1
4
1
0
Field
9323
P3
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
p. Period
3.58
4/1-9/15
:'Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
35 bu. 1
07-21-16
Manure
137
106
631
23
1
4
1
0
P Removal
IRating
28 lbs/ac. ILow
BALANCE 1
01
1061
631
23
1
41
1 1
0
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2016 NMR Page 5 of 15

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1
N
P205
K20
Mg
Mn
Zn
Cu
Lime
(lbs/A)-
(Ibs/A)
(Ibs/A)
(Ibs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(lbs/A)
(tons/A)
Tract Field 9323 P3
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period 3.58 10/1-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date 1.0 Tons 07-21-16
Manure
30
231138
5
0
1
0
0
P Removal Rating 15 lbs/ac. ILow
BALANCE
0
23
138
5
0
1
0
0
Tract Field 9323 P4
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period 3.53 4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans, Manured,
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Double Crop
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Norfolk
Residual
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date 35 bu. 07-21.16
Manure
137
106
631
23
1
4
1
0
P Removal • Rating 28 lbs/ac. Low
BALANCE
0
106
631
23
1
4
1
0
Tract Field 9323 P4
Req'd Nutrients
56
0
0
0
ID
0
0
0
Acres App. Period 3.53 10/1-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
u
0
u
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ple Date 1.0 Tons 07-21=16
Manure
30
23
138
5
0
1
0
0
Rating 151bs/ac. Low
BALANCE
0
23
138
5
0
1
0
0
Field 9323 P5
P
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. Period 3.95 4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans, Manured,
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Double Crop
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date 35 bu. 07-21-16
Manure
137
106
631
23
1
4
1
0
P Removal Rating 28 lbs/ac. Low .
BALANCE
0
106
631
23
1
4
1
0
Tract I Field 9323 P5
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period 3.95 10/17-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
RYE 1, Sample Date 1.0 Tons 07-21-16
Manure
30
23
138
5
0
1
01
0
P Removal I Rating 1 15 lbs/ac. l-ow
BALANCE
0
23
138
51
0
]1
0
0
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2016 NMR Page 6 of 15

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
j
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
I Field
9323
P6
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
3.38
10/1-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
07-21-16
Manure
30
23
138
5
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
15 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
23
138
5
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
9323
P6
Req'd Nutrients
133
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
3.38
4/1-9/15
Supplied By: .
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
34 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
133
103
613
23
1
4
1
0
P Removal
Rating
271bs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
103
613
23
1
4
1
0
Tract
Field
9323
P7
Req'd Nutrients
50
i]
u
U
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
2.84
10/1-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
07-21-16
Manure
30
23
138
5
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
15 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
23
138
5.
0
1
0
0
Tract
I Field
- 9323
P7
Req'd Nutrients
133
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
2.84
4/1-9/.15
Supplied By:
z Y
����'
•'F
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ple`Date
34 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
133
103
613
23
1
4
1
0
RAp
Rating
27 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
f03
613
23
1
4
1
0
Field
9323
P8
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p. Period
1.17
10/1-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
'Starter
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0'
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
IP
Date
1.0 Tons
07-21-16
Manure
30
23
138
5
0
1
0
0
Removal
Rating
15 lbs/ac.
.ow
BALANCE
0
23
138
5
0
1
0
0
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2016 NMR Page 7 of 15

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract Field
9323
P8
Req'd Nutrients
133
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
1.17
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
U
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ple Date
34 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
133
103
613
23
1
4
1
0
l Rating
E
27 lbs/ac.
L.ow
BALANCE
0
103
613
23
1
4
1
0
Field
9323
P9
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
p. Period
0.59
10/1-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
.01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
ti orfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
E Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
07-21-16
Manure
30
23
138
5
0
1
0
0
emoval
F
Rating
15 lbs/ac.
ILow
BALANCE
0
23
88
5
0
1
0
0
ract Field
9323
P9
Req'd Nutrients
133
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
res App.
Period
0.59
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
34 bu. 1
07-21-16
Manure
133
103
613
23
1
4
1
0
P Removal Rating
27 lbs/ac.
l-ow
BALANCE
0
103
563
23
1
4
1
0
Tract
Field
9323
P10
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
50
0
0
0
01
0
Acres App.
Period
1.54
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
.01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ple Date
35 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
137
106
631
23
1
4
1
0
EA
l Rating
281bs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
106
581
23
1
4
1
0
Field
9323
P10
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
50
0
0
0
'0
0
p. Period
1.54
10/1-3/31
Supplied By:
Owl
.`M
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
4
a
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
07-21-16
Manure
301
23
138
5
0
1
01
0
P Removal
I Rating
15 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
01
23
88
51
01
1 1
0
0
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2016 NMR Page 9 of 15

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)'
P2O5
(lbs/A)
K2O
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
I Field
9323
PH
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
2.98
10/1-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
07-21-16
Manure
30
23
138
5
0
1
01
0
P Removal
I Rating
15 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
23
88
5
01
1
0
0
Tract
I Field
9323
PH
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
2.98 1
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
35 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
137
106
631
23
1
4
1
0
P Removal Rating
281bs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
106
581
23
1
4
1
0
Tract
I Field
9323
P12
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres A
PP• Period
3.06
10/1-3/31
Supplied B
pp Y
� ,
.,,
A
e
ram..
v
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
6
4
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
ple Date
1.0 Tons
07-21-16
Manure
30
23
138
5
0
1
0
0
RA
Rating
15 lbs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
0
23
88
5
0
1
0
0
Field
9323
P12
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
. Period
3.06
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Date
35 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
137
106
631
23
1
4
1
0
RRYFIle
Rating
28 lbs/ac.
f-ow_
BALANCE
0
106
581
23
1
4
1
0
Field
9323
P13
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Period
3.14
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:.,
CROP
Soybeans, Manured;
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
35 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
137
106
631
23
1
4
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
28 lbs/ac.
11,ow
BALANCE I
0
106
581
231
1
4
1
0
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2016 NUR Page 9 of 15

Nutrient Management. Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(Ibs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(Ibs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
93=
P13
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
3.14
10/1-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ple Date
1.0 Tons
07-21-16
Manure
30
23
138
5
0
1
0
0
D
Rating
15 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
23
88
5
0
1
0
0
. Field
9323
P14
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
50
0
0
0
0
0p.
Period
3.23
10/1-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
1 97-21-16
Manure
30
23
138
5
0
1
0
0
P Removal I Rating
151bs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
23
88
5
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
9323
P14
Req'dNutrients
137
0
50
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
3.23
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
'^:Orfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ple Date
35 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
137
106
631
23
1
4
1
0
DA
Rating
28 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
106
591
23
1
4
1
0
Field
9323
P15
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
p. Period
2.29
10/1-3/31
Supplied By:
_
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
07-21-16
Manure
30
23
138
5
0
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
15 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
23
88
5
0
1
0
0
Tract
Field
9323
P15
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres P. Period
2.29
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
35 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
137
106
631
23
1
41
1
0
P Removal
Rating
28 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
106
581
23
11
4
1
0
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed:. 9/19/2016 NUR Page 10 of 15

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(Ibs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(Ibs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
time
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
9323 HW 1
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
7.97 10/1-3/31
Supplied By:
�
AM
= .
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
1 1.0 Tons
07-21-16
Manure
30
23
138
51
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
15 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
23
138
5
0
1
01
0
Tract I Field
9323
HW I
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
7.97
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
CommercialFert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
35 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
137
106
631
23
1
4
1
0
P Removal I Rating
28 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
106
631
23
1
4
1
0
Tract I Field
9323
HW 3
Req'd Nutrients
137
0
50
0
ID
0
0
1.)
Acres App.
Period
11.13
4/1-9/15
Supplied By:
CROP
Soybeans, Manured,
Double Crop
Starter
11
0
0
0
0
0'
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ple Date
35 bu.
07-21-16
Manure
137
106
631
23
1
4
1
0
Rating
R
28 lbs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
0
106
581
23
1
4
1
0
Field
9323
HW3
Req'd Nutrients
50
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
p. Period
11.13
10/1-3/31
Supplied By.:
CROP
Small Grain Overseed
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
1.0 Tons
07-21-16
Manure
30
23
138
5
0
1
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
15 lbs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
0
23
88
5
0
1
0
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2016 NMR Page 11 of 15

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
Tract Field
2
9323 Pi
Req'd Nutrients
N
(Ibs/A)
98
k05
(lbs/A)
0
K20
(Ibs/A)
0
Mg
(lbs/A)
0
Mn
(lbs/A)
0
Zn
(lbs/A)
0
Cu
(Ibs/A)
0
Lime
(tons/A)
0
Acres App. Period
CROP
2.40 3/15-8/31
Sorghum, Grain
Supplied By:
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
ple Date
Norfolk
55 CWT 07-21-16
Residual
Manure
0
98
0
76
0
451
0
17
0
1
0
3
0
1
0
0
E
l Rating
41 lbs/ac.
t.dw
BALANCE
0
76
451
17
1
3
1
0
Field
9323
P2
Req'd Nutrients
98
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p. Period
3.81
3/15-8/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Sorghum, Grain
�
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
55 CWT
07-21-16
Manure
98
76
451
17
1
3
1
0
P Removal Rating
41 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
76
451
17
1
3
1
0
Tract Field
9323
P3
Req'd Nutrients
98
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
3.58
3/15-8/31
Supplied By:
_ :-- `
—
-- -
CROP
Sorghum, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
ple Date
55 CWT
07-21-16
Manure
98
76
451
17
1
3
1
0
DA
Rating
41 lbs/ac.
L.ow
BALANCE
0
76
451
17
1
3
1
0
Field
9323
P4
Req'd Nutrients
98
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. Period
3.53
3/15-8/31
Supplied By:.
CROP
Sorghum, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
55 CWT
07-21-16
Manure
98
76
451
17
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
41 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
76
451
17
1
3
1
0
Tract
, Field
9323
P5
Req'd Nutrients
98
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App. Period
3.95
3/15-8/31
Supplied By:
A
a
CROP
Sorghum, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0'
0
0'
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0.
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE,1 Sample Date
55 cwr 1
07-21-16
Manure
98
76
451
171
1
3
1 1
0
P Removal
Rating
41 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
76
451
17
1
3
1
0
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2016 NMR Page 12 of 15

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
Obs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract.
Field
9323
P6
Req'd Nutrients
96
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App.-Pedod
3.38
1 3/15-8/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Sorghum, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
b
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
54 CWT
07-21-16
Manure
96
74
442
16
1
3
1
0
P Removal
IRating
.41 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
74
442
16
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
9323
P7
Req'd Nutrients
96
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
2.84
3/15-8/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Sorghum, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
54 CWT
1 07-21-16
Manure
96
74
442
16
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
41 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
74
442
16
1
3
1
0
Tract Field
9323
P8
Req'd Nutrients
96
0
0
0
Ct
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
1,17
3/15-8/31
Supplied By:
-CROP
Sorghum, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ple Date
54CWT
07-21-16
Manure
96
74
442
16
1
3
1
0
l Rating
R
41 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
74
442
16
1
3
1
0
Field
9323
P9
Req'd Nutrients
96
0
50
0
0
0
0p.
Period
0.59
3/15-8/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Sorghum, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
'0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
54 CWT
07-21-16
Manure
96
74
442
16
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
41 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
74
392
16
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
9323
P10
Req'd Nutrients
98
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
1.54
3/15-8/31
Supplied By:
-
z
CROP
Sorghum, Grain
Starter
0'
0
0
0
0
a,
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
.55 CiW
07-21-16
Manure
98
76
451
17
1
3
1
0
P Removal Rating
41 lbs/ac.
ow
BALANCE
0
76
401
17
1
3
1
0
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2016 NUR Page 13 of 15

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20 Mg
(lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Traci
Field
9323
PH
Req'd Nutrients
98
0
50 0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
2.98
3/15-8/31
Supplied By:
:..-
CROP
Sorghum, Grain
Starter
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fed.
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample Date
55 CWT
07-21-16
Manure
98
76
451 17
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
41 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
76
401 17
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
9323
P12
Req'd Nutrients
98
0
'50 0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
3.06
3/15-8/31
Supplied By:
=
--
CROP
Sorghum, Grain
'Starter
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
55 CWT
1 07-21-16
Manure
98
76
451 17
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
41 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
76
401 17
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
9323
P13
Req'd Nutrients
98
0
50 0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
3.14
3/15-8/31
Supplied By:
_
CROP
Sorghum, Grain
Starter
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
55 CWT 1
07-21-16
Manure
98
76
451 17
1
3
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
41 lbs/ac. ILow
BALANCE
0
76
401 17
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
9323
P14
Req'd Nutrients
98
0
50 0
0
0
0
0
Acres jApp.
Period
3.23
3/15-8/31
Supplied By:
-- _
-
CROP
Sorghum, Grain
Starter
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
01
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
55 CWT
07-21-16
Manure
98
76
451 17
1
.3
1
0
P Removal Rating
41 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
76
401 17
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
9323
P15
Req'd Nutrients
98
0
50 0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
2.29
3/15-8/31
Supplied By:
`.KIS
z
CROP
Sorghum, Grain
Starter
0
0
0 0
0
011
0'
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Sample
r
Date
55 CWT
07-21-16
Manure
98
76
451 17
1
3
1
0
oval
Rating
41 lbs/ac.
row
BALANCE
01
761
401 17
11
3
11
0
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2.016 NNM Page 14 of 15

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(Ibs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(Ibs/A)
Mg
(Ibs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(Ibs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract 7Field
9323
HW 1
Req'd Nutrients
98
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
7.97
3/15-8/31
Supplied By:
-
CROP
Sorghum, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
55 CWT
07-21-16
Manure
98
76
451
17
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
41 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
76
451
17
1
3
1
0
Tract
Field
9323
HW 3
Req'd Nutrients
98
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
Acres App.
Period
11.13
3/15-8/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Sorghum, Grain
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Norfolk
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
55 CWT 1
07-21-16
Manure
98
76
451
17
1
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
41 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE 1
0
76
401
17
1
3
1
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2016 NMR Page 15 of 15

The. Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate
excessive levels of copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper
can adversely affect plant growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can
be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071, respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85.
By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample.
Application of lime at recommended rates is necessaryto maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production .
Required Soil Test Values
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
Lime Recom.
(tons/acre)
Cu-I
Copper Recommendation
Zn-I
Zinc Recommendation
9323
PI
wheat, Grain
5.6
0.6
202
None
201
None
9323
PI
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
PI
Small Grain Overseed
5.6
1 0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
P1
Sorghum, Grain
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None.
9323
P2
Wheat, Grain
5.6
0.6
202
None
201
None
9323
P2
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
P2
Small Grain Overseed
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
P2
Sorghum, Grain
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
P3
Wheat, Grain
5.6
0.6,
202
None
201
None
9323
P3
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
P3
Small Grain Overseed
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
P3
Sorghum, Grain
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
P4
Wheat, Grain-
5.6
0.6
202
None
201
None
9323
P4
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
P4
Small Grain Overseed
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
P4
Sorghum, Grain
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
P5
Wheat, Grain
5.6
0.6
202
None
201
None
9323
P5
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
P5
Small Grain Overseed
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
P5
Sorghum, Grain,
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
P6
Wheat, Grain
5.6
0.6
202
None
201
None
9323
P6
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-19-2016 STV Page 1 of 3

e
uired
oil Test Values
Lime Recom.
Tract
Field
Crop
pH
(tons/acre)
Cu-I
Copper Recommendation
Zn-I
Zinc Recommendation
9323
P6
Small Grain Overseed'
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
P6
Sorghum, Grain
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
P7
Wheat, Grain
5.6
0.61
202
None
201
None
9323
P7
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop.
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
P7
Small Grain Overseed
5.6
0.0
202
1 None
201
None
9323
P7
Sorghum, Grain.
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
P8
Wheat, Grain
5.6
0.6
202
None
201
None
9323
P8
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
P8
Small Grain Overseed
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
P8
Sorghum, Grain
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
P9
Wheat, Grain
5.5
0.6
196
None
152
None
9323
P9
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.5
0.0
196
None
152
None
9323
P9
Small Grain Overseed
5.5
0.0
196
None
152 1
None
9323
P9
Sorghum, Grain
5.5
0.0
196
None
152
None
9323
P10
Wheat, Grain
5.5
0.6
196
None
152
None
9323
P10
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.5
0.0
196
None
152
None
9323
P10
Small Grain Overseed
5.5
0.0
196
None
152
None
9323 1
P10
Sorghum, Grain
5.5
0.0
196
None
152
None
9323
PH
Wheat, Grain '
5.5
0.6
196
None
152
None
9323
PH
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.5
0.0
196
None
152
None
9323
PH
Small Grain Overseed
5.5
0.0
196
None
152
None
9323
PH
Sorghum, Grain
5.5
0.0
196
None
152
None
9323
P12
Wheat, Grain
5.5
0.6
196
None
152
None
9323
P12
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.5
0.0
196
None
152
None
9323
P12
Small Grain Overseed
5.5
0.0
196
None
152
None
9323
P12
Sorghum, Grain
5.5
0.0
196
None
152
None
9323
P13
Wheat, Grain
5.5
6.6
196
None;
152
None
9323
P13
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.5
0.0
196
None
152
None
a
P13
Small Grain Overseed
5.5
0.0
196
None
152
None
P13
Sorghum, Grain
5.5
0.01
196 1
None
152
None
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-19-20.16 STV Page 2 of 3

Tract
uuv
Field
Crop
pH
Lime Recom.
(tons/acre)
Cu-I
Copper Recommendation
-Zn-I
Zinc Recommendation
9323
P14
Wheat, Grain
5.5
0.6
196
None
152
None
9323
P14
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.5
0.0
196
None
152
None
9323
P14
Small Grain Overseed
5.5
0.0
196
None
152
None
9323
P14
Sorghum, Grain
5.5
0.0
196
None
152
None
9323
P15
Wheat, Grain
5.5
0.6
196
None
152
None
9323
P15
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.5
0.0
196
None
152
None
9323
P15
Small Grain Overseed
5.5
0.0
196
None
152
None
9323
P15
Sorghum, Grain
5.5
0.0
196
None
152
None
9323
HW 1
Wheat, Grain
5.6
0.6
202
None
201
None
9323
HW 1
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
HW 1
Small Grain Overseed
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
HW 1
Sorghum, Grain
5.6
0.0
202
None
201
None
9323
HW 3
Wheat, Grain
5.5
0.6
196
None
152
None
9323
HW 3
Soybeans, Manured, Double Crop
5.5
0.0
196-
None
152
None
9323
HW 3
Small Grain Overseed
5.5
0.0
196
None
152
None
9323
HW 3
Sorghum, Grain
5.5
0.0
196
None
152
None
t
1 i
O
�.l
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-19-2016 STV Page 3 of 3

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. `Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should betaken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also
be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
14.69
48.75
97.50
146.26
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
29.38
24.38
48.75
73.13
Soybean 40 bu
160
15.67
45.71
91.41
137.12
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-19-2016 Sludge Page 1 of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity ofthe'facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
�kvailable Waste Storage Canacity
Source Name
I Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/1
1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
149
1
2
180
1
3
180
1
4
180
1
5
149
1
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
180
1
9
180
1
10
149
1
11
146
1
12
115
2
1
84
2
2
88
2
3
89
2
4
59
2
5
103
2
6
148
2
7
180
2
8
180
2
9
180
2
10
180
2
11
180
2
12
149
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-19-2016 Capacity Page 1 of 1

Required. Specifications For Animal Waste.Mana2ement
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with.a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the.
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility 'to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons.per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not. be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2016 Specification Page 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or:when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not.
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial .waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be appliedcloser than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2016 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should.be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at thelacility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps,. reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human. consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume forwaste storage ponds.
949071 Database Version 4.1
Date Printed: 9/19/2016 Specification Page 5

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 9/19/2016 Specification Page 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8, P9, P10, Pl 1,
P12, P13, P14, P15, HW 1, HW 3
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review.the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): P1, P2, -P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8, P9, P10, PI 1,
P12, P13, P14, P15, HW 1, HW 3
Wheat: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, wheat should be planted from October 20-November 25. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU
"Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting
no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety
"green book" and information from private companies to select a high. yielding variety with the
characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting.
Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test report can also be applied at this time. The remaining
N should be applied during the months of February -March. The total N is dependent on the soil type.
Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the wheat.
Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): PI, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8, P9, P10, P11,
P12, P13, P14, P15, HW 1, HW 3
Grain Sorghum
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-19-2016 Crop Note. Page 1 of 2

The following crop note applies to field(s): P1, 'P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8, P9, P10, Pll,
P12, P13, P14, P15, HW 1, HW 3
Double -Crop Soybeans, Coastal Plain: Mineral soil; medium leachable
Double -crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no -tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 2-4 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills; 4-6 seed/row foot for 15" rows; 6-8 seed/row foot for 30" rows
and 8-10 seed/row foot for 3 6 " rows. Increase the seeding rate by at least 10% for no -till planting.
Seeding depth should be 1-1 1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash
recommended for the soybeans can be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own
nitrogen and are normally grown without additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre
N are sometimes made at planting to promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed
during the growing season to monitor the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of
weeds and insects is essential for profitable double crop soybean production.
949071 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 09-19-2016 Crop Note Page 2 of 2

Bryan Langley Wettable Acres
TRACT
FIELD
PULL
LENGTH
IIE/S
START
STOP
WETTED DIA
ACRES
SOIL
CROP
9323
1
1
473
E
0.35
-
189
2.40
NoA
9323
1
2
840
I
0.34
-
180
3.81
NoA
9323
1
3
882
E
0.34
-
160
3.58
NoA
9323
1
4
819
E
0.26
-
174
3.53
NoA
9323
1
5
874
1
0.34
-
180
3.95
NoA
9323
1
6
736
1
0.34
-
180
3.38
NoB
9323
1
7
606
1
0.34
-
180
2.84
NoB
9323
1
8
188
E
0.35
-
189
1.17
NoB
9323
9
55
E
0.35
-
189
0.59
NrB2
9323
10
290
I
0.34
-
180
1.54
NoA
9323
11
640
1
0.34
-
180
2.98
NoA
9323
12
659
1
0.34
-
180
3.06
NoA
9323
13
678
1
0.34
-
180
3.14
NoA
9323
14
700
1
0.34
-
180
3.23
NoA
9323
15
446
E
0.35
-
189
2.29
NoA
9323
HW 1.
-
-
-
-
-
7.97
NoA
9323
FHW 3
-
-
-
-
-
11.13
NoA
F1 ACRES
F3 ACRES
32.62
27.96
AVAILABLE
AVAILABLE
ACRES IN
ACRES IN
24.65
16.83
PULLS 1-8
PULLS 9-15
HW1 ACRES 7.97
HW3 ACRES 11.13

USDA United States
Department of Agriculture Wayne County, North Carolina
4.
AWL
VVII
i
Farm 11129
Tract 9323
2016 Program Year
Page Cropland Total: 70.9 acres
Map Created November 02, 2015
Base Image Layer flown in 2014
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non -Cropland
=Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
0 Restricted Use
p Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
Compliance Provisions
xiucer and/or the NAIP Imagery. The producer
accepts me aata -as is' ano assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any usefs reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
wetland identifiers do not represent the size, shape, or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determination (CPA-026 and attached maps) for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

No
NoA
B ry
an Langley�..r
qb
Ni
NOB +
s
�a,.
' r-�. L•���R Ioinc —�4��J feet

BRYAN LANGL,EY
WELL pOae, �A�Ps
N
1
Scale: V=400'

Version —November 26, 2018
Mortality Management Method_ s
Indicate which method(s) will be implemented.
When selecting multiple methods indicate a primary versus secondary option.
Methods other than those listed must be approved by the State Veterinarian.
Primary Secondary Routine Mortality
a a Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours of knowledge of animal
death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water
(G.S.106-403). The bottom of the burial pit should beat least one foot above the seasonal
high water table.:Attach burial location map and plan.
Landfill at municipal solid waste facility permitted by NC DEQ under GS 15A NCAC
13B .0200.
aRendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7.
aa Complete incineration according to 02 NCAC 52C .0102.
a a A composting system approved and permitted by the NC Department of Agriculture & Con-
sumer Services Veterinary Division (attach copy of permit). If compost is distributed off -farm,
additional requirements must be met and a permit is required from NC DEQ.
a(� In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the
�} NC Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services (G.S. 106-549.70).
El
Any method which, in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian,. would make possible
E-1the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health.
(Written approval by the State Veterinarian must be attached).
Mass Mortality Plan
Mass mortality plans are required for.farms covered. by an NPDES permit. These plans are
also recommended for all animal operations. This plan outlines farm -specific mortality man-
agement methods to be used for mass mortality. The NCDA&CS Veterinary Division sup-
ports a variety of emergency mortality disposal options; contact the Division for guidance.
• A catastrophic mortality disposal plan is part of the facility's CAWMP and is activated
when numbers of dead animals exceed normal mortality rates as specified by the State
Veterinarian.
• Burial must.be done in accordance with NC General Statutes and NCDA&CS Veterinary
Division regulations and guidance.
• Mass burial sites are subject to additional permit conditions (refer to facility's animal
waste management system permit).
• In the event of imminent threat of a disease emergency, the State Veterinarian may enact
additional.temporary procedures or measures for disposal according to G.S. 106-399.4.
L!��
Signature of Farm Owner/Manager
'T Signature ofJ7 chnical Specialist
Date
Date

Operator:DANNY LAN8LEY County: WAYNE Date: 02/10/93
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner): 1300.0 feet
1. STEADY STATE LIVEWEIGHT
0
sows
(farrow
to finish)
x 1417
|bs.
= 0
|bs
0
sows
(farrow
to feeder)
x 522
/bs.
= 0
|bs
1836
head
(finishing
only)
x 135
|bs.
= 247860
(bs
0
sows
(farrow
to wean)
x 433
|bs.
= 0
}bs
0
head
(wean to
feeder)
x 30
|bs.
= 0
!bs
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) = 247860 I b s
Z. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 247860 |bs. SSLW x Treatment Vu|ume(CF)/ib. SSLW
Treatment Vo|ume(CF)/|b. SSLW= 1 CF/|b. SSLW
Volume = 247860 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet ; "Owner requests no sludge storage.
4. TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME Sludge wi11 be removed as needed."
Inside top length 250.0 feet ; Inside top width 197.0 feet
Top of dike at elevation 51.0 feet
Freeboard 1.0 feet ; Side slopes 3.0 : 1 (Inside lagoon)
Total design lagoon liquid level at elevation 50.0 feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation 39.0 feet
Seasonal high water table elevation 45.2 feet
Total design volume using prismoida| formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 BS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 244.0 191.0 11.0
AREA OF TOP
LEN8TH* WIDTH =
244.0 191.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
178.0 125.0
46604.0 (AREA OF TOP)
22250.0 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
211.0 158.0 133352.0 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = [AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA 8OTTOM3 * DEPTH/6
46604.0 133352.0 22250.0 1.8
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT TOTAL DESIGN LIQUID LEVEL = 370711 CU. FT.
�
�

5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
250.0 197.0 49250.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
Length * Width =
250.0 3.0 750.0 square feet
TOTAL DA 50000.0 square feet -
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Approximate daily production of manure in CF/LB SSLw 0.00136
Volume = 247860 Lbs. SSLW * CF of Waste/Lb./Day * 180 days
Volume = 60529 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of freshwater used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted -for in 5A.
Volume =
0.0
gallons/day *
180 days storaSe/7.48 gallons
Volume =
0.0
cubic feet
per CF
Volume of rainfall
in
excess of evaporation
Use period of
time
when rainfall exceeds
evaporation by largest amount.
180 days
excess
rainfall =
7.0 inches
Volume =
7.0
in * DA / 12 inches per
foot
Volume = 29166.7
cubic feet

5D. Volume of
25 year
- 24 hour storm
Volume
=
7.0 inches / 12 inches
per foot * DA
Volume
= 29166.7
cubic feet
TOTAL
REQUIRED
TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A.
60529 cubic
feet
5B.
0 cubic
feet
5C.
29167 cubic
feet
5D.
29167 cubic
feet
TOTAL
118862 cubic
feet
6. SUMMARY
Total required volume 366722 cubic feet
Total design volume avail. 370711 cubic feet
Min. req. treatment volume plus sludge accumulation 247860 cubic feet
At elev. 47.2 feet ; Volume is 250188 cubic feet (end pumping)
Total design volume less 25yr-24hr storm is 341544 cubic feet
At elev. 49.3 feet ; Volume is 338724 cubic feet (start pumping)
Seasonal high water table elevation 45.2 feet
7. DESIGNED BY:^aLow, 1W APPROVED 8Y: ARK�
DATE: 00,3 DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN

u. S. Department of Agriculture NC-ENO-34
Soil Conservation Service September 1980
File Code: 210
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS
Landowner bKN94 County
Community or Group No. Conservation Plan No..
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of DO �' Ft. Length of Flood Pool 7--5'0 Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation—2 '
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Est. Elev. :tst. Elevation
Kind of :Improvements: of Breach,
Reach: Length: Width: Slope: Land use Improvements Above :Floodwater Above
Flood Plain: Flood Pl.ain
Ft. Ft. % Ft. Ft.
1
2
3
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach Nvr c-.. s'k6k-[ bk)w 1 J5 3 o r f 7-
OtZ pkop
<34 f�. N.1LL� o,vs Sk. l Z .3/ lit SfJO
Hazard Classification of Dam b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
Dam Classification (I, II, III IV, V)
By
name
title
Concurred By
name title
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date
Date ?,/ / 8' $3
0

Operator:Danny Langley County: Wayne
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner):
1. AVERAGE LIVE WEIGHT (ALW)
0 sows (farrow to finish)
0 sows (farrow to feeder)
2480 head (finishing only)
0 sows (farrow to wean)
0 head (wean to feeder)
Describe other :
Date: 07/15/94
1300.0 feet
x 1417
lbs.
= 0
lbs
x 522
lbs.
= 0
lbs
x 135
lbs.
= 334.800
lbs
x 433
lbs.
= 0
lbs
x 30
lbs.
= 0
lbs
0
Total Average Live Weight = 334800 lbs
2. MINIMUM.REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 334800 lbs. ALW x Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. ALW = 1 CF/lb. ALW
Volume = 334800 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
No 'PA6,6-
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet t 4 er
Sic b L - t1ja 66- �6;vj oil &b
4. TOTAL DESIGNED VOLUME
Inside top length (feet)--------------------- 460.0
Inside top width (feet)---------------------- 147.0
Top of dike elevation (feet)----------------- 51.3
Bottom of lagoon elevation (feet)------------ 39.3
Freeboard (feet)----------------------------- 1.0
Side slopes (inside lagoon)------------------ 3.0 : 1
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 454.0 -141.0 11.0
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
454.0 141.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
388.0 75.0
64014 (AREA OF TOP)
29100 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF
MIDSECTION
LENGTH
* WIDTH * 4
421.0
108.0
181872 (AREA
OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT.
_ [AREA TOP
+ (4*AREA MIDSECTION)
+ AREA BOTTOM] * DEPTH/6
64014.0
181872.0
29100.'0 1.8
Total Designed Volume
Available = 504141 CU. FT.0

1
5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width = '
460.0 147.0 67620.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
0.0 square feet Describe this area.
TOTAL DA 67620.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Feces & urine production in gala/day per 135 lb. ALW 1.37
Volume = 334800 lbs. ALW/135 lbs. ALW * 1.37 gal/day 180 days
Volume = 611568 gals. or 81760.4 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume = 0.0 gallons/day * 180 days storage/7.48 gallons
per CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount.
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 in * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 39445.0 cubic feet
5

5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.0 inches / 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = 39445.0 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A.
81760
cubic
feet
5B.
0
cubic
feet
5C.
39445
cubic
feet
5D.
39445
cubic
feet
TOTAL 160650 cubic feet
6. SUMMARY
Temporary storage period========___=========> 180 days
Rainfall in excess of evaporation=====___===> 7.0 inches
2.5 year - 24 hour rainfall==================> 7.0 inches
Freeboard===================================> 1.0 feet
Side slopes_________________________________> 3.0 . 1
Inside top length____________________ _______> 460.0 feet
Inside top width============================> 147.0 feet
Top of dike elevation=======================> 51.3 feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation==================> 39.3 feet
Total required volume=======================> 495450 cu. ft.
Actual design volume================___=___=> 504141 cu. ft.
Seasonal high watertable elevation (SHWT)===> 44.8 feet
Stop pumping elev.__________________________> 47.5 feet
Must be > or = to the SHWT elev.==========> 44.8 feet
Must be > or = to min. req. treatment el.=> 45.3 feet
Required minimum treatment volume===========> 334800 cu. .ft.
Volume at stop pumping elevation= =====___=> 338633 cu. ft.
Start pumping elev._________________________> 49.6 feet
Must be at bottom of freeboard & 25 yr. rainfall
Actual volume less 25 yr.- 24 hr. rainfall==> 464696 cu. ft.
Volume at start pumping elevation== =___===> 460202 cu. ft.
Required volume to be pumped=== =========___> 121205 cu. ft.
Actual volume planned to be pumped==========> 121569 cu. ft.
Min. thickness f soil liner when required==> 1.8 feet
7. DESIGNED BY:1k .J �, APPROVED BY: GU :ice
DATE: �' DATE: 25'-t9 ¢
a
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS: Girt 5C-AVA&d 56eOtC bOa A10?' C�& �Fy

d. S. Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
NC-ENG-34
September 1980
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR MM LAGOONS
Landowner :County WAYNE
Community or Group No. Conservation Plan No.
Lagoon
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Ft. Length of Flood Pool wd Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam.failure.
st..E ev. :Est. levation
. Kind of :Improvements:, of Breach
Reach: Length: Width: Slope: Land Use Improvements Move :Floodwater Above
Flood. Plain: Flood Plain
Ft. Ft. % Ft. Ft.
1
�0 vsJ5.
,r
A
2
3 .
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach NotiF, Sop�r1J 13�PErA f SST Ada b&(M i� �F
ZAc-OOA
Hazard Classification of Qw G� b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
Dam Classification (I, II, III, Ig V)
L ►/
name
4f-/
tle
PConcurred By d�v
Name)title
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date &4k
Date )1 Yl 9 Y,
1Z