20151077 Ver 1_401 Application_20151015

A.
CWS
Carolina Wetland Services
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
704 -527 -1177 - Phone
704 -527 -1133 - Fax
TO: Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDWR —NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury St
9th Floor, Archdale Building
Raleigh NC 27604
Date: 10/15/2015
CWS Project 4: 2015 -3681
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
2p1510 �7
WE ARE SENDING YOU: ®Attached ❑Under separate cover via the following items:
® Prints ❑ Plans ❑ JD Package ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ Wetland Survey ® Other
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE
1 10/15/2015 5 Application for WQC 3890
2 10/12/2015 1 Application Fee ($570)
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
®For approval ❑Approved as submitted ❑Resubmit copies for approval
®For your use ❑Approved as noted ❑Submit copies for distribution
❑As requested ❑Returned for corrections ❑Return corrected prints
❑For review and comment ❑For your verification and signature
REMARKS: Karen, Please find attached five copies of the Pre - Construction Notification and application for
WOC 3890 for the Weddinoon Walk project. A check for the application fee of $570 is als a --._—
Copy to: File �.; � @ 0 V
Thank ou OCT
y �T 16 2015
J OENR •WATER RESOURCE.;
4 FF R PFRWrnj Ci
Gregg Antemann, PWS
Principal Scientist
NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 201 -
BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM FI
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Weddington Walk
2. Work Type: Private F Institutional 11 Government F1 Commercial 11
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
The purpose of this project is to develop approximately 103 acres of property into a single - family
residential subdivision.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Mattamy Homes; POC: Mr. Bob Wiggins
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 —or ORM Consultant ID Number]: CWS; POC: Mr. Gregg Antemann, PWS
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and /or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
Located north of Weddington Road and west of Rock Hill Church Road in Concord, North Carolina
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 61a]: 56009548920000, 56009536900000, 56009496710000
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Cabarrus
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Concord
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Coddle Creek
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 62c]: Yadkin (HLIC 03040105)
Authorization: Section 10 F1 Section 404
Regulatory Action Type:
_ Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 29
Regional General Permit #
7 Jurisdictional Determination Request
FSection 10 & 404
_ Pre - Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
_ Compliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704 -527 -1177 (office)
704 -527 -1133 (fax)
October 15, 2015
Mr. William Elliott
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue
Asheville, NC 28801
Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street, 9th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: Pre - Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 29
and Water Quality Certification No. 3890
Weddington Walk
Concord, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2015 -3681
Dear Mr. Elliott and Ms. Higgins:
The Weddington Walk site is approximately 103 acres in extent and is located north of Weddington Road
and west of Rock Hill Church Road in Concord, North Carolina (Figure 1, attached). The purpose of this
project is to develop a residential subdivision in a developing area of Concord. Mattamy Homes has
contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide Section 404/401 permitting services for this
project. An executed Agent Authorization Form is attached.
Applicant Name: Mattamy Homes; POC: Mr. Bob Wiggins
Mailing Address: 2127 Ayrsley Town Blvd., Suite 201, Charlotte, NC 28273
Phone Number of Owner /Applicant: (704) 604 -8424
Street Address of Project: north of Weddington Road and west of Rock Hill Church Road in
Concord, North Carolina
Waterway: UTs to Coddle Creek
Basin: Yadkin (HUC 03040105)
City: Concord
County: Cabarrus
Tax Parcel ID numbers: 56009548920000, 56009536900000, and 56009496710000
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: 35.402365 °, - 80.644793°
USGS Quadrangle Name: Kannapolis, NC, dated 1996
Site Conditions
The site consists of undeveloped forested areas and maintained agricultural fields (Figure 2, attached).
Typical on -site vegetation includes hackberry (Celtis occidentalis), eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana),
willow oak (Quercus phellos), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciva), slippery elm (Ulmus rubra), Carolina
shagbark hickory (Carya carolinae- septentrionalis), Nepalese browntop (Microstegium vimineum), poison
ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), sawtooth blackberry (Rubus argutus), and Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus
quinquefolia).
NORTH CAROLINA . SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS- INC.NET

Weddington Walk October 15, 2015
Pre - Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WOC 3890 CWS Proiect No. 2015 -3681
According to the Soil Survey of Cabarrus County' (Figures 3 and 4, attached), on -site soils consist of
Armenia loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded (ArA), Iredell loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (IdA),
Mecklenburg loam, 2 to 8 and 8 to 15 percent slopes (MeB and MeD, respectively. Armenia loam (ArA) is
listed as hydric and Iredell loam (IdA) is listed as having hydric inclusions in the North Carolina Hydric
Soils List for Cabarrus County2. Both Armenia loam and Iredell loam are listed as hydric soils on the
National Hydric Soils List for Cabarrus County.3
Jurisdictional Delineation
On July 14, 2015, CWS scientists Aliisa Harjuniemi, Wetland Professional in Training (WPIT) and Erin
Bradshaw Settevendemio, WPIT, delineated jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including wetlands, within the
project area (Figure 5, attached). Jurisdictional areas were delineated (flagged in the field), classified, and
surveyed with a sub -foot Trimble Geo7X GPS using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE) Routine
On -Site Determination Method. This method is defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual4, the 2007 USACE Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebooks, with
further technical guidance from the Eastern Mountains & Piedmont Regional Supplement', dated April
2012. A Wetland Determination Data Form representative of on -site wetland areas is attached as DPI. A
Wetland Determination Data Form representative of on -site non jurisdictional upland areas is attached as
DP2. The locations of these data points are identified as DPI and DP2 on Figure 5 (attached).
Jurisdictional stream channels were classified according to recent USACE and North Carolina Division of
Water Resources (NCDWR) guidance. These classifications included sampling with a D- shaped dip net,
taking photographs, and defining approximate breakpoints (location at which a channel changes
classification) within each on -site stream channel.
Results
The results of the on -site field investigation conducted by CWS indicate that there are three jurisdictional
stream channels (Streams A -C) and three jurisdictional wetland areas (Wetlands AA -CC) located within the
project area (Figure 5, attached). On -Site jurisdictional waters drain to Coddle Creek. Coddle Creek is part
of the Yadkin River basin (HUC 03040105)' and is rated "Class C Waters" by the NCDWR. According to
the NCDWR, Class C Waters are defined as: "Waters protected for uses such as secondary recreation,
fishing, wildlife, fish consumption, aquatic life including propagation, survival and maintenance of
biological integrity, and agriculture."
On -Site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. total approximately 1.03 acre of jurisdictional wetlands, including
4,171 linear feet (If) of jurisdictional stream channel. On -Site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. are
summarized in Table 1, next page.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2013 Soil Survey of Cabarrus County, North Carolina
'- United States Department of Agriculture —Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1999 North Carolina Hydnc Soils List, USDA -NRCS
North Carolina State Office, Raleigh
' USDA -NRCS Hydnc Sods List, http //soils usda gov /use /hydnc /lists /state html, updated 2014
Environmental Laboratory 1987 "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual ", Technical Report Y -87 -1, US Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi
' USACE Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebook 2007 USACE Regulatory National Standard Operating Procedures for
conducting an approved Jurisdictional determination (JD) and documenting practices to support an approved JD USACE Headquarters,
Washington, DC
' US Army Corps of Engineers, April 2012 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual Eastern
Mountains and Piedmont Region US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi
"HUC" is the Hydrologic Unit Code U S Geological Survey, 1974 Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina
2

Weddington Walk October 15, 2015
Pre - Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WOC 3890 CWS Proiect No. 2015 -3681
Table 1. St mmary of on -site Jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
Stream C Intermittent SCP3 26.5 37 107 0.01
Stream Total: 4,171 If 0.34 ac.
.�< � .a :Acreage.
Jurisdictionallfeature
Wetland AA
Wetland BB
Wetland CC
Perennial Streams
DPI 0.02
DPI 0.04
DPI 0.63
Wetland Total: 0.69 ac.
Perennial streams are those that typically have year -round flow. These streams typically have greater
biological resources than intermittent streams, and are capable of supporting those resources that
require perennial flow. This section describes the on -site perennial streams and the field observations
supporting this determination.
The results of the on -site field investigation conducted by CWS indicate that there is one perennial stream
channel (Stream A) located within the project area (Figure 5, attached). Stream A originates off -site in the
northeastern portion of the property and flows southwest across the property boundary for approximately
2,292 linear feet (If) until continuing off site.
Perennial Stream A (R5UB28) exhibits strong continuity of bed and bank, strong in channel structure,
moderate baseflow, and moderate sinuosity of channel. Biological sampling within Stream A revealed a
weak presence of macrobenthos and amphibians. Stream characteristics indicate that continuous flow is
present year round in typical year. Stream A was classified as a perennial stream according to USACE/EPA
guidance. Perennial Stream A scored 54 out of a possible 100 points on the USACE Stream Quality
Assessment Worksheet and 34 out of a possible 63 points on the NCDWR Stream Classification Form,
indicating perennial status (SCPI, attached). Photograph A (attached) is representative of Perennial Stream
A.
e R5UB2 = Perennial stream with unconsolidated sand bottom, Cowardm et al Classification System, 1979
3
;USEIC,E`
'Stiea'm NCDWRa°
Stream ;
;p' ..�:..., `
Length' , i° °Acreage
Ju'ri`sdictionil ` ''`Pei
ienn aU
- 1Classifiea"bion•`' ' . " Stream :
�;
,
Feature
lnt'erniittent�
,_
Point' "'Cl'assificationt
Quality_.
' r Linear,
` =(ac:)r;;
!
��,Score.
Ass' stuent
Feet (If�,� ; -
(SCP) ;
:!
.. ".Score;
Stream A
Perennial
SCPI 34
54
2,292 0.21
Stream B
Intermittent
SCP2 22.5
39
1,772 0.12
Stream C Intermittent SCP3 26.5 37 107 0.01
Stream Total: 4,171 If 0.34 ac.
.�< � .a :Acreage.
Jurisdictionallfeature
Wetland AA
Wetland BB
Wetland CC
Perennial Streams
DPI 0.02
DPI 0.04
DPI 0.63
Wetland Total: 0.69 ac.
Perennial streams are those that typically have year -round flow. These streams typically have greater
biological resources than intermittent streams, and are capable of supporting those resources that
require perennial flow. This section describes the on -site perennial streams and the field observations
supporting this determination.
The results of the on -site field investigation conducted by CWS indicate that there is one perennial stream
channel (Stream A) located within the project area (Figure 5, attached). Stream A originates off -site in the
northeastern portion of the property and flows southwest across the property boundary for approximately
2,292 linear feet (If) until continuing off site.
Perennial Stream A (R5UB28) exhibits strong continuity of bed and bank, strong in channel structure,
moderate baseflow, and moderate sinuosity of channel. Biological sampling within Stream A revealed a
weak presence of macrobenthos and amphibians. Stream characteristics indicate that continuous flow is
present year round in typical year. Stream A was classified as a perennial stream according to USACE/EPA
guidance. Perennial Stream A scored 54 out of a possible 100 points on the USACE Stream Quality
Assessment Worksheet and 34 out of a possible 63 points on the NCDWR Stream Classification Form,
indicating perennial status (SCPI, attached). Photograph A (attached) is representative of Perennial Stream
A.
e R5UB2 = Perennial stream with unconsolidated sand bottom, Cowardm et al Classification System, 1979
3

Weddington Walk October 15, 2015
Pre - Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WOC 3890 CWS Proiect No. 2015 -3681
Intermittent Streams
Intermittent streams are those streams that exhibit continuous flow seasonally. This flow regime is the result
of a lowering of the water table during dry periods that stops groundwater discharge to the stream channel.
Intermittent streams do not typically support aquatic life requiring year -round flow to support reproductive
and maturation stages.
The results of the on -site field investigation conducted by CWS indicate that there are two intermittent
stream channels (Streams B and C) located within the project area (Figure, attached). Stream B originates
offsite at the northern property boundary and flows southeast for approximately 1,7721f until its confluence
with Stream A. Stream C originates on -site in the southwestern portion of the property and flows southeast
for approximately 107 If until its confluence with Stream A.
Streams B and C (R4UB29) exhibit weak to moderate bed and banks, weak to moderate sinuosity of
channel, and absent to weak baseflow. Biological sampling within Streams Band, C revealed an absence of
macrobenthos and amphibians. Stream characteristics indicate that continuous flow is present at least three
months in typical year. Streams B and C were classified as intermittent streams according to USACE /EPA
guidance. Intermittent Streams B and C scored 39 and 37, respectively, out of a possible 100 points on the
USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet and 22.5 and 26.5, respectively, out of a possible 63 points
on the NCDWR Stream Classification Form, indicating intermittent status (SCP2 and SCP3, attached).
Photographs B and C are representative of Intermittent Streams B and C, respectively.
Wetlands
The USACE and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) define wetlands as: "Those areas that are
inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that
under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil
conditions. "10 The USACE uses three parameters to identify jurisdictional wetlands. These parameters are
as follows: 1) hydrophytic vegetation, 2) wetland hydrology, and 3) hydric soils. Except in certain atypical
situations, all three parameters must be present in order for an area to be determined to be a jurisdictional
wetland. This section describes each on -site jurisdictional wetland and the field observations that led to their
determinations.
Wetlands AA, BB, and CC exhibit low chroma soils, oxidized rhizospheres, and saturation to the surface.
Dominant vegetation for Wetlands AA, BB, and CC include soft rush (Juncus effusus), green ash (Fraxinus
pennsylvanica.), shallow sedge (Carex lurida), and black willow (Salix nigra). Wetlands AA, BB, and CC
are classified as herbaceous wetlands (PEM1 t). Figure 5 (attached) depicts the locations of these wetlands.
A Wetland Determination Data Form 1 (DPI, attached) is representative of Wetlands AA, BB, and CC.
Photographs D, E, and F (attached) are representative of Wetlands AA, BB, and CC, respectively.
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on September 29, 2015 to
determine the presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would
be affected by the project. In a response letter dated October 13, 2015, the SHPO states that they "are
aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project ". A copy of the SHPO response
9 R4UB2 = Intermittent stream with unconsolidated sand bottom, Cowardm et al Classification System, 1979
"Environmental Laboratory 1987 "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual ", Technical Report Y -87 -1, US Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi
" PEM = Emergent wetland, Cowardm et al Classification System, 1979
4

Weddington Walk October 15, 2015
Pre - Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WOC 3890 CWS Proiect No. 2015 -3681
letter is attached. CWS also consulted the SHPO online GIS service12 database and found no sites of
architectural, historical, or archaeological significance within the project limits.
Protected Species
CWS performed a data review using North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data
Explorer 13 on September 28, 2015 to determine the presence of any federally - listed, candidate
endangered, threatened species or critical habitat located within the project area. Based on this review,
there are no records of federally - protected species within the project limits or within a mile of the
project site. A copy of the data review report is attached.
The Northern long -eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) is one of the species of bats most impacted by the
white -nose syndrome disease. Habitat for the Northern long -eared bat includes forested areas of any
age, rocky areas with boulders, and culverts greater than four feet wide. Due to recent population
declines of almost 89% caused by white -nose syndrome and continued spread of the disease, the
Northern long -eared bat now receives protection as a Threatened species under the Endangered
Species Act. A Threatened species is defined as a taxon likely to become endangered within the
foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range14.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is requesting the documentation of amount of wooded
acres cleared in connection with any construction project that takes place within any county shown on
the June 30, 2015 White -Nose Syndrome Buffer Zone Map, attached. This project takes place within
the Northern long -eared bat habitat range. Due to the nature of this subdivision construction project,
approximately 70 acres of wooded area will be cleared for this project and may trigger the need for a
bat survey. Please note that physical surveying for potential habitat within this project has not
been included in this scope at this time.
Purpose and Need for the Project
The purpose of this project is to develop approximately 103 acres of property into a single - family
subdivision located in Concord, North Carolina (Figure 6, attached). Concord is experiencing rapid
population growth due its proximity to Huntersville, Kannapolis, and north Charlotte and there is a
need for residential housing in order to meet the current demand. This project is not a phased project
and adjoining subdivisions are all owned by individuals and /or companies not associated with the
Weddington Walk project.
Road crossings are unavoidable in order to develop the site while meeting local planning ordinances
requiring appropriate emergency vehicle access to all parts of the subdivision (Figure 6, attached).
Avoidance and Minimization
Impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable.
Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream
waters. Construction activities and impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will comply with
all conditions of Nationwide Permit 29 and Water Quality Certification No. 3890. All work will be
constructed in the dry. Impacts have been limited to less than 300 if of jurisdictional stream channel
and no impacts to jurisdictional wetlands are proposed.
In an attempt to minimize impacts to jurisdictional waters while still meeting the goals of the project, a "No
Build" alternative was considered. The property was purchased for the purpose of providing residential
* North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office, http Hgis ncdcr gov /hpoweb/ Accessed September 29, 2015
" North Carolina Natural Heritage Data Explorer, https Hncnhde natureserve org/ Accessed September 28, 2015
* The U S Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 1973 Endangered Species Act http / /www fws gov /endangered /laws - policies/
5

Weddington Walk October 15, 2015
Pre- Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WOC 3890 CWS Proiect No. 2015-3681
housing to meet the growth and demand of'an area in Concord experiencing significant population growth.
A "No Build" option would not meet the project goals of providing necessary housing to meet the current
demand. Therefore, the No Build Alternative was eliminated from further consideration.
Impacts were reduced through the use of headwalls at the inlets and outlets of the proposed culverts in order
to minimize the lengths required for the proposed crossings. All proposed culverts will be buried one foot
below the existing stream bed to maintain aquatic life passage and low flows. All proposed culverts were
also designed to maintain bankful channel dimensions. Energy dissipaters, such as rip rap aprons, are
unnecessary due to the culvert designs. Additionally, the location of an existing culvert was utilized to
reduce impacts by 20 feet (Figures 6 and 10)
The project has been thoughtfully designed to avoid impacts wherever possible. The currently proposed site
plan was developed as a result of this alternatives analysis and avoidance and minimization process. We
believe that the current site plan is the best possible plan that meets the project goals while avoiding impacts
to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. to the greatest extent practicable.
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
Under Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 29, unavoidable permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters
associated with this project are limited to a total of 230 linear feet (If) of jurisdictional stream channel
(Stream A and Stream B). Impacts to Streams A and B are the result of the construction of three road
crossings and one road crossing culvert extension (Crossings # 1 -4). Figure 6 (attached) depicts the
proposed subdivision layout overview and proposed impacts are summarized in Table 2 (below).
Table 2. Proposed impacts to. jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
�
ream,- F? 230'lf eit SE'Ti tal Perinan :04 acre
The proposed road crossings are necessary in order to complete the subdivision and provide sufficient
ingress and egress for emergency vehicles throughout the development. Stream A divides the property
in half and Stream B bisects the northwestern portion of the property. Therefore, alternative options
for road access while avoiding impacts to jurisdictional streams are limited. Proper sediment and
erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters.
Crossinv #1
Proposed Road Crossing #1 is located in the northeastern portion of the property (Figure 7, attached).
The installation of a culvert for this road crossing will result in 70 if of permanent impacts to Perennial
Stream A. Road Crossing #1 will utilize a 67- linear foot, 72 -inch corrugated metal pipe (CMP) with
headwalls at both the inlet and outlet of the culvert. The proposed culvert will be buried one foot
below the bed of the channel to allow passage of aquatic life and maintain low flows. A plan view,
°...r. s
�JurisdictionaI "- �
�Im'pact; '
Terriporary� -, �
�Irnpacts °
''Featdre°'
Crossing,# �, . ;
; Type::_ ,
, ; ` ,for v.. ' .. '
' <<( linear
RerinAn6nt, f
feet)-
Crossing #1 C
Culvert P
Permanent 7
70 0.01
Stream A C
Crossing #2 C
Culvert P
Permanent 6
65 0.01
Crossing #4 C
Culvert P
Permanent 2
25 0.01
Stream B C
Crossing #3 C
Culvert P
Permanent 7
70 0.01
ream,- F? 230'lf eit SE'Ti tal Perinan :04 acre
The proposed road crossings are necessary in order to complete the subdivision and provide sufficient
ingress and egress for emergency vehicles throughout the development. Stream A divides the property
in half and Stream B bisects the northwestern portion of the property. Therefore, alternative options
for road access while avoiding impacts to jurisdictional streams are limited. Proper sediment and
erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters.
Crossinv #1
Proposed Road Crossing #1 is located in the northeastern portion of the property (Figure 7, attached).
The installation of a culvert for this road crossing will result in 70 if of permanent impacts to Perennial
Stream A. Road Crossing #1 will utilize a 67- linear foot, 72 -inch corrugated metal pipe (CMP) with
headwalls at both the inlet and outlet of the culvert. The proposed culvert will be buried one foot
below the bed of the channel to allow passage of aquatic life and maintain low flows. A plan view,

Weddington Walk October 15, 2015
Pre - Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WOC 3890 CWS Proiect No. 2015 -3681
profile, and cross - sectional view of the proposed road crossing are attached as Figures 7 -9,
respectively.
Crossing #2
Proposed Road Crossing #2 is located in the center /southern portion of the property (Figure 10,
attached). Originally, 85 if of impacts were proposed for this crossing. However, an existing 22 If,
60 -inch RCP culvert will be replaced linear foot for linear foot, resulting in a reduction of impacts by
22 If. Therefore, Road Crossing #2 will result in 65 if of permanent impacts to Perennial Stream A.
Road Crossing #2 will utilize a double barrel 80- linear foot 72 -inch wide by 84 -inch high reinforced
concrete p' ipe (RCP) with headwalls at both the inlet and outlet of the culvert. The proposed culvert
will be buied one foot below the bed of the channel to allow passage of aquatic life and maintain low
flows. A plan view, profile, and cross - sectional view of the proposed road crossing are attached as
Figures 10 -12, respectively.
Crossing #3
Proposed Road Crossing #3 is located in the center portion of the property (Figure 13, attached). The
installation of a culvert for this road crossing will result in 70 if of permanent impacts to Intermittent
Stream B. Road Crossing #3 will utilize a double barrel 66- linear foot, 60 -inch CMP pipe with
headwalls at both the inlet and outlet of the culvert. The proposed culvert will be buried one foot
below the bed of the channel to allow passage of aquatic life and maintain low flows. A plan view,
profile, and cross - sectional view of the proposed road crossing are attached as Figures 13 -15,
respectively.
Crossing #4
The Road Crossing #4 is an extension of an existing 48 -inch CMP located in the southwestern portion
of the property (Figure 16, attached). The extension is necessary to update the culvert per current local
ordinances and design standards. The extension of this culvert will result in 25 If of permanent impact
to Perennial Stream A. A headwall will be installed to minimize the length of the culvert extension
required. A plan view, profile, and cross - sectional view of the proposed road crossing are attached as
Figures 16 -18, respectively.
On behalf of Mattamy Homes, CWS is submitting a Pre - Construction Notification Application with
attachments in accordance with Nationwide Permit General Condition No. 31, and pursuant to
Nationwide Permit No. 29 and Water Quality Certification No. 3890.
Compensatory Mitigation
As permanent stream impacts total to greater than 150 linear feet (If), compensatory mitigation is
required. There are currently no mitigation banks available for the purchase of mitigation credits in
the project's service area. Proposed impacts requiring mitigation total 230 linear feet of permanent
stream impact consisting of 160 if of perennial and 70 if of intermittent stream. Mattamy Homes
proposes to mitigate for the permanent stream impacts through the purchase of stream mitigation
credits from the NC Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). The credit acceptance letter is attached

Weddington Walk October 15, 2015
Pre- Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WOC 3890 CWS Proiect No. 2015 -3681
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 704 - 408 -1683, or through email at gregg @cws- inc.net should you
have any questions or comments regarding this request.
Sincerely,
Z71- (!�I. Aa7'��
Gregg Antemann, PWS
Professional Wetland Scientist
tgeoi aeerrg
��x *ngoaPt K ET(,,gy °� �s
O '
' •
tip i�Q.t�ili '� x •
1 Y
s���oBBd890 ABitr�d���w
fay//UW&
Kelly Thames, WPIT
Project Scientist
Attachments: Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map
Figure 2. Aerial Imagery Map
Figure 3. Current USDA -NRCS Cabarrus County Soil Survey
Figure 4. Historic USDA -NRCS Cabarrus County Soil Survey
Figure 5. Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map
Figure 6. Proposed Impacts - Overview
Figure 7 -18. Crossings 1 -4: Profiles and Cross Sections
Agent Authorization Form
Preliminary JD Form
Pre - Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 29
NCDWR Stream Classification Form (SCP1 -SCP3)
USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets (SCPI -SCP3)
USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms (DP I -DP2)
Agency Correspondence
Representative Photographs (A -F)
Survey Plat
DMS Credit Acceptance Letter
cc: Mr. Bob Wiggins, Mattamy Homes
Mr. Steve Bailey, P.E., ESP Associates

J , y tltu�•� - �}
4.
e '•• �� Rock Hill Church Road
Q� i s � t� ,r 9�' • 1
/+ \ �m' 630 iS` � . �l ..` ' f Of �, F o, •
:,/ �• - _ _mar �i`"�/� -a-
65� / q �• � a� IYi
Weddington•Road
e- r
n \
Dom`_ � ��•�� �� J �� �� ~• ^� �� � � � �\
' Ni'
r— �l Ai
� ����'n�r" '; rte' • 1 � V ��
CSC 110I Legend
Project Limits
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet
REFERENCE: 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC USGS QUADRANGLE, KANNAPOL /I C. DATED 1996
Holly Grove I All 6.
SCALE: 1 2000' DATE 9 -28 -1 5 FIGURE NO.
G V USGS Site Location Map
CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY:
2015 -3681 AVH Weddington Walk
APPLICANT NO: CHECKED BY: CAROLINA Concord, North Carolina /
GCA WETLAND SERVICES CWS Project No. 2015 - 3681 //

Ikl--
f
ALI
7 x ON
P
-
t ' -
t
� / J
REFERENCE: BACKROUND AERIAL IMAGERY PROVIDED BY ESRI, ACCESSED 2015
SCALE: 1„ : 4001 DATE 9.28 -15
CWS PROJECT NO DRAWN BY: AV H CL
2015 -3681
APPLICANT NO: CHECKED BY: CAROLINA
KMT I WETLAND SERVICES
E
400 200 0
Aerial Imagery Map
Weddington Walk
Concord, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2015 -3681
Legend
OProject Limits
Tax Parcels
400 Feet
IJIGURE NO
2

CuD2
W;
W
Soils - Description
ArA— Armenia loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded
IdA— Iredell loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
MeB— Mecklenburg loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
MeD— Mecklenburg loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
LIM
'�d1� �CuD2
Legend
Project Limits
W
Streets
1,000 500 0 1,000 Feet
REFERENCE: CURRENT USDA -NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF CABARRUS COUNTY, DATED 2013
SCALE: 1" : 1000' DATE: 9-28-15 Current USDA -NRCS Soil Survey
CWS PROJECT NO DRAWN BY: of CabarruS County
2015 -3681 AVH Weddington Walk
y4PPLICANT NO: CHECKED BY CAROLINA Concord, North Carolina
\ KMT WETLAND SERVICES CWS Project No. 2015 -3681
FIGURE NO.
3
0

w
Map
U
CuD2 13 'v
U)
MeB u' C
Poplar Tent Road �/ CU02
Ch
MeB
� - ,.:� MeD MOB
Ch
IdA - p
1
d A
a Jar ,
Ar, �p IdA
�v
Ar eD
IdA
- � tom
MeB ,
MeB Me �.
MeD e0
Weddington Road IdA
IdA 'MeB
' M
Ar IdA,
water - - - -
Ar
ela 8 - e8
soils - Description Legend
M
F-'g
ArA— Armenia loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded
IdA— Iredell loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Project Limits
MeB — Mecklenburg loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
MeD — Mecklenburg loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes M e
1,000 500 0 1.000 Feet
REFERENCE HISTORIC USDA -NRCS SOIL SURVEY OF CABARRUS COUNTY, SHEET 1, DATED 1976
SCALE: 1" 1000' DATE: 9 -28 -15 Historic USDA-NRCS Soil Survey FIGURE NO.
CWS PROJECT NO DRAWN BY: of r Cabarrus County 4
2015 -3681 AVH Weddington Walk
PPLICANT NO: CHECKED BY: CAROLINA Concord, North Carolina
KMT WETLAND SERVICES CWS Project No. 2015 -3681

Intermittent Stream B
1,772 If
4'• � � <� � a -5 , f . 1, _..�� .
Wetland AA
0.02 acre
Wetland BB
0.04 acre
Intermittent Stream C
107 If
I
REFERENCE: BACKROUNDAERIAL IMAGERY PROVIDED BY ESRI, ACCESSED JULY 20JTHE ON -SITE FEATURES MRE DELINEATED (FLAGGED IN THE FIELD), CLASSIFIED, AND
SURVEYD WITH SUB -FOOT GPS BY CVVS, INC. ON JULY 14, 2015.
NOTE: ON -SITE NON - JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE
SCALE: 111:4001 DATE: 9 -28 -15
CM PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY: V ^` /H
2015 -3681 / 1
APPLICANT NO: CHECKED BY: CAROLINA
\ KMT WETLAND SERVICES
Perennial Stream A
2,292 If
Approximate Jurisdictional FIGURE NO.
Boundary Field Map c
N "'eddington Walk 5
Concord, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2015 -3681
Legend
QProjed Limits
•� Perennial Stream
• • • • • Intermittent Stream
• • • • • Ephemeral Conveyance
Wetland
Culvert
Photo Location & Direction
Wetland CC
A S C P Stream Classification Point
0.63 acre
• DP Data Point
400 200
0 400 Feet
Approximate Jurisdictional FIGURE NO.
Boundary Field Map c
N "'eddington Walk 5
Concord, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2015 -3681

EXISTING
LAUREL PARK
SUBDIVISION
Proposed impact - Crossing # 3
70 If permanent impact
(culvert)
-,-Figures 13 -15
�� _.11. : �BMP 4 .
�1 i/ J f J1 /l%l111 i)BMP1�
�\ 0
!) — Proposed impact - Crossing # 4
25 If permanent impact
(culvert extension)
_ J�) J r f - _- Figures 16 -18
_ ,TON ROAD i
! _ 1111�`h.rAk
FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY.
DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND
LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY
11
461,1/
� C:/ ti
ii (I J
/)1111111)11 = � l�j /I y� // /,\�l\ (((tl 1 // � 11r1,�
\\'� i1)Il11 —,�J»t Kr,�1n }�\�II� I� /s /ilf(r'W( I\� _
11111/1 %Ji�IJ ////(%1 _�`J� %�II( /J������Jl / /Orll
%// / %�/ L EXISTING it //� /� -,/ \ e ="
CRESTVIEW
t(.(.r( UBDIVISION
Proposed impact - Crossing # 1
70 If permanent impact
PROPOSED (Culvert)
WEDDINGTON WALK SITE - Figures 7� -y9 i
+ r•KU?'Ub CULVERT
CROSSING #1
SEE SHEET 2-4
!1 I \ J
\P3\ ` /rll(( /�1`J X.1//
Proposed impact - Crossing
- 65 If permanent impact
1 (culvert)
1�I
Figures 10 -12
110 w oA
1
i
w
0f
w
O
U)
H
U
Q
a
0
w
U)
a-
0
J
O
1--
Z
W
R
yC
LL Cn
LL,
2
0
r
J1J V1ii! /� 111. °
/ J1 / m o N
^ M
Ir( o o
LL
BAR SCALE 1" =500' m r Z o r
w m ~
LU U a w Z
c�
= �
0 230' 300' 1000' o
c a O c=n

Perennial Stream A /
�.. co ,
\ - ' PROPOSED HEADWALL Z c
Q o
a z
f O
U
0
D 72" CMP CULVERT - Proposed impact: Crossing #1 Z
/1Y /1-- 5 70 If permanent impact (culvert) CJ) Q
PROPOSED 70 LF 0
STREAM IMPACT - Fig. 8 Profile
— /// �� - Fig. 9 Cross section U O
PROPOSED HEADWALL
W Z
J
LU
LL
o
^ M
cr LL.
LMLI o
LEGEND BAR SCALE 1 =500 >
FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY. o m Z ° N
LU DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON P -RPW = PERENNIAL- RELATIVELY PERMANENT WATERS v w ? w
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND w O CD w
LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY S -RPW = SEASONAL - RELATIVELY PERMANENT WATERS.. 1� C) 0 a o CO

680
PROPOSED ACACIA LANE
r
/
67�
PlOPJSED HEADWALL
I
~ DESIGN BY OTHERS
PROPOSED HEADWALL
I
'
DESIGN 3Y OTHERS
670
r
1
EXISTING GRA 3E
66r
/
PRO'.
1' STREAM
PROPOSED 70 LF
BED MATERIAL
STREAM IMPACT
PROPOSED
INVERTS TO BE, '
BELOW EXISTING
GRADE (TYP.)
660
N
Lo �
M v
Lo
CO
0')
CO
OD
CO
0 +00
0 +50
1 +00 1 +50
FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY.
DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND
LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY
C80
C75
C70
665
SCALE: 1 " =4' VERTICAL
1 " =40' HORIZONTAL
bA �
w
1="
�--L�
t
U
z
d
0
U
z
O
U
W Y
J J
a: a
o
O
Lu
Z
Q
J Lu
U
ui
w
2w
0
x
a
K
o
m 0 v o
U) Mc�
°o r
U-
W 0
w
�o
z M
o
LLJ
m ¢
U
Y z W z H
W Q O (D W LU
x CL� =
U o d 0 cn

r -o o -n
p m m O
D -< N X
�yL�C
D D
Q m
�r<0
ci
o cn
o c,
OyDO
G7�mm
/
m
i
amc
=�03
toz=1
ca =1
I
D m O
i
000
z
z
+
675.48
/
I
0
0
cn
675.476
0
O
o
'
D
n
D
I
D
�
D
000
675.97
/'
z
m
0
675.974
i
i
000
676.47
Cn
C)
676.473
�
1
03
<�
677.18
D m
m m o \
0
677.184
m \
v m
m \
z
D
678.36
m
\
V)
0
678.363
\
D
\
rn
II II
�
o�
1
0 X
X
D
C)
C> m
o ccn
OD m
o
0
Z
D
r
CHECKED BY:
SB
DRAWN BY:
TD
CULVERT #1 CROSS SECTION
Fig.
PROJECT NUMBER:
DS05.400
ORIGINAL DATE:
09/14/2015
IMATTAMY
WEDDINGTON WALK
9
ESP
SHEET: 401
13
HOMES
CONCORD,
NC

i
�S-RPW
i `Seasonal Stream B A,
Proposed impact: Crossing 2
- 65 If permanent impact (culvert)
I - Fig. 11 Profile
- Fig. 12 Cross section
I
I' I
I
/ I I PROPOSED 26 LF
/ ' I STREAM IMPACT
I
I I PROPOSED HEADWALL /
I y
0
LEGEND
FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY.
DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON P -RPW = PERENNIAL - RELATIVELY PERMANENT WATERS
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND
LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY S -RPW = SEASONAL - RELATIVELY PERMANENT WATERS
�///�Pererinial'Stream AI
PROPOSED 39 LF
STREAMIMPACT /
/ / // //
�)n o
w
=Lml
U
PROPOSED HEADWALL Z °
0:
PROPOSED DUAL 72 "W x 84 "H o
/BOX CULVERT
EXISTING 22 LF I ft
OF 60" CMP TO
BE REMOVED
I 1 Z J
cn a
O
o
Existing 22 If 1�—
culvert to be w Z
replaced >
LIJ
Q
Q w
\ 0
a
U a
a a
...
m ° N
C/5 P-o M
�
°o r
LL
\
mw O
BAR SCALE
1"=500'
m o
; Z
W m Q
U � Z W
U'
0 250' 500'
1000'
LLJ
LLJ ¢° w 0:: 2-
v

w
660 I I I 660 =04
PROPOSED ACADIA LANE w
65G 655
U
Z
1
EXISTING 22LF OF 60"
PROPOSED HEADWALL
MPITO BE REMOVED / p
DESIGN BY OTHERS
p
PROPOSED HEADWALL U
DESIGN BY OTHERS PROPOSED DUAL
650 \ I /—.72" BOX CULVERTS 650 J
Q
EXISTING GRADE 0
{ / ( O
04
_ y tf 4,,"o, onn49 // Ue
Z
645 I IX� 645 W
PROPOSED 26 LF �f- — — — —) > Q
STREAM IMPACT ` — — - = W
I PROPOSED 39 LF
STREAM IMPACT (�
I I I
INVERPROP BE 1D' \� PROP. l' STREAM w
BED MATERIAL 2
BELOW EXISTINC p
GRADE (TYP.)
x
640 640
N CCR M - rn
M
CO
L V L
CO (O CO o
0 0
co ° N_
0 +00 0 +50 1 +00 1 +50 0 0
uj
w
U,
�<
>Q
FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY. °O > z °
DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON SCALE: 1"=4' VERTICAL Lu m v
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND 1"=40' HORIZONTAL w � — c5 w
LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY cx> C) a_ p ES

tb
CIA
iz
660
E60
I
I
I
I
I
�
�
PROPOSED ACADIA LANE
655
— —
055
Z
U
r
Z
o
U
�
Z
650
050
cn
c
z
c Z
/ EXISTING GRA )E
O
` _
/
645
1 / '
\_ EXISTI VG 60" CMP
045
(V Z
�$
0
TO BE REMOVED
0
PROP. D JAL 72"
I
I
I
� 111
BOX CULVERTS
\
W
\ PROP.1'STREAM
BED MATERIAL
J
U ui
640
640
M
(fl
I-
rn
Oi 00
O rn
O N N
O o f� CO 0)
}
�
¢
O
Lo
�
N M
Lo
(D
((D
° o
7 +50
8 +00
8 +50 9 +00 9 +50
° o
U) �7
o�
0
Lu
w
FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY.
SCALE: 1 " = 4'
VERTICAL
o m J
¢
DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON
w
Y z ,;; z
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND
1 " =40'
HORIZONTAL
= 3 E5 Lu
LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY
C) 0 a_ 0 cn

i
Seasonal Str&
PROPOS
PR
60"
7
1 - _
OAKLEY GROVE U
� _ t
FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY.
DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND
LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY
S -RPW
n
0
f \
W
LEGEND lY BA SCALE 1" =500' m r z o
co ♦— J
P -RPW = PERENNIAL - RELATIVELY PERMANENT WATERS v ' z w
2
S -RPW = SEASONAL - RELATIVELY PERMANENT WATERS � 500 �� L) 0 a o cn
i
�a
FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY.
DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND
LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY
S -RPW
n
0
f \
W
LEGEND lY BA SCALE 1" =500' m r z o
co ♦— J
P -RPW = PERENNIAL - RELATIVELY PERMANENT WATERS v ' z w
2
S -RPW = SEASONAL - RELATIVELY PERMANENT WATERS � 500 �� L) 0 a o cn

mw
FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY. CO
DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON SCALE: 1 " =4' VERTICAL °w co v
z
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND 1 " =40' HORIZONTAL w Q O C! w
LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY v l
0 a. 0 U)
PROPOSED OAKLEY GROVE LANE
670
070
I
I
�
PROPOSED HEADWALL
DESIGN BY OTHERS
665
PROPOSED DUAL 60"
z
PROPOSED HEADWALL
CM' CULVERTS
DESIGN 3Y OTHERS
/
I
I
!
I
0
U
�
/ I
EXISTING GRADE
°
OF ,0" cmp (�
660
LF
'6 `, ' 560
W
a-
PROPOSED 70 L =
PROP. 1' S i REAM
0
M �
�
��
S -REAM IMPACT
BED MATERIAL
655 1 1 j
5�5
Lu 0
PROPOSED
in
INVERTS TO BE 1'
J Lu
_//
BELOW EXISTING
V
GRADE (TYP.)
Lu
Lu
0
x
650
650
a
00
co co co
GO V 00
a
0')
m r
Lo co Lo
co co
o
m ° N
~ O �
0 +00
0 +50 1 +00 1 +50
C/) 0
w
w
mw
FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY. CO
DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON SCALE: 1 " =4' VERTICAL °w co v
z
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND 1 " =40' HORIZONTAL w Q O C! w
LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY v l
0 a. 0 U)

675
PROPOSED OAK _EY GROVE LANE
670
075
670
FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY.
DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND
LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY
SCALE: 1 " =4' VERTICAL
1 " =40' HORIZONTAL
.0,00
.. 44; �.
U
Z
D
665
Q'
O
665
Z
O
U
Z
O
H
Y
W J
v, a
Z
O
U
0
M Z
� o
� o
EXISTING GRADE
660
\
-
J
660
�r
I _
:IRO'. DUAL 60"
U)
w
0
CMP CULVERTS
x
PROP. 1' STREAM
a
BED MATERI AL
655
I I I
655
CO
co
cn
o
(o
o
cD o
rn
c0 n
o
cep
cD
(�D coo
p
((O co
o
(o co
co
�
(0 (0°0
(o
co
(O o
(o o
W o
(O co
8 +50
9 +00
9 +50
10 +00
10 +50
FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY.
DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND
LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY
SCALE: 1 " =4' VERTICAL
1 " =40' HORIZONTAL
.0,00
.. 44; �.
U
Z
D
Q'
O
U
Z
O
U
Z
O
H
Y
W J
v, a
Z
O
U
0
M Z
� o
� o
W
W
J
U
U)
w
0
x
a
o
0 0
m M N_
cf) O
co l
o�
0
w
w
mw
it F-
M Cl
r z
L m r-
z v
w O w
O
U 0 a O cn

1 "
1
S-RPW � ,
P -RPW -
Seasonal Stream C
` I � U
Perennial Stream Al Z
/ a o
PROPOSED HEADWAL
PROPOSED 25 LF ! 1 / / I co
STREAMIMPACT ; / Q J
PROPOSED 8 LF
OF 48" CMP
Proposed impact: Crossing #4
25 If permanent impact t� Z
— — (culvert extension) 7= 0
.- Fig. 17 Profile z �
Fig. 18 Cross section
z
Uj
EXISTING 48"
WEDDINGTQ ROAD
CMP CULVERT V LL1
LEGEND J �y BAR SCALE 1 " =500' > > a
FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY. o m °
DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON P -RPW = PERENNIAL - RELATIVELY PERMANENT WATERS w
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND w o w
LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY S -RPW = SEASONAL - RELATIVELY PERMANENT WATERS 250 500 �� C ) o a o Cl)

645
640
635
630
625
EXISTING WEDDINGTON ROAD
PROPOSED
ROAD WIDENING
PROPOSED HEADWALL
f t D =SIGN BY OTHERS
i
I
I
_ PROPOSED 25 LF
STREAM IMPACT
EXIST. 40 LF 0= / \\� \_ FIR OPOSEDI8 LF OF 48" CMP J ADDITIONAL 48" CMP
PROP.l'STREAM
BED MATERIAL
00
M
ti
O
O
co
O
M
M
O
O
co
0 +00
0 +50
1 +00
FOR USACOE PERMITTING ONLY.
DESIGN EVALUATION BASED ON
PHYSICAL SURVEY DATA AND
LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY
045
640
635
630
025
W i
J J
O ?�
a 0
~ Z
Lu
J
W
U
0 0
1 +50 � ° o
o�
0
w
mw
Q
>
m z o
SCALE: 1 " =4' VERTICAL uj °7 v
1 " =40' HORIZONTAL cY� w _CD w
x ° cr� :I-
C-) o a 0 cn
U
Z
O
U
Z
O
U
y
r
C

rvo -+
D -< y X
;aLn3c
- g0z(1)
-0 r C n
0(n >m
�m >m
= j O 3
D Z
D(j)
z 00 O
�OrZ-
z
U)
n
D
m
m
A-p-
c.
=m
o�
N
Z m
--I
D
r
m
L<
z
G)
m
m
0
0
z
rn rn rn rn O m
N W W A A
Cn O (.n n O 0 (.1
Z
0 \ �J
om \ O
f 0
D (n
m m \
�m I
o+ 639.81
1
p 639.813
I
C X
r cn
+ 640.00 m '
0 640.000 °'_
n
i
i \
N W W A A
T O (f O Cn
• CHECKED BY:
SB
DRAWN BY:
TD
CULVERT #4 CROSS SECTION
Fig
PROJECT NUMBER:
DS05.400
ORIGINAL DATE:
09114/2015
ESP
18
SHEET:
WEDDINGTON WALK
MATTAMY HOMES CONCORD, NC

AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
I, Bob Wiggins representing Mattamy Homes, hereby certify that I have authorized
Gregg Antemann of Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. to act on my behalf and take all
actions necessary to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of this request for wetlands
determination / permitting and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and
accurate to the best of our knowledge.
0
Applicant's sill Agent's signature
Date,
Date
9/28/15
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign all future application correspondence.

ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): 10/15/15
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Gregg Antemann
550 It Westinghouse Blvd., 28273, Charlotte, NC
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
Wilmington District
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Located north of Waddington Road and west of Rock Hill Church Road in Concord, North Carolina
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC County /parish /borough: Cabarrus City: Concord
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.402365 °N; song, 80.644793 OW.
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: coddle creek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters:
4.171 linear feet: 3 -5 width (ft) and /or 0.34 acres.
Cowardin Class: R4LIB, R5LIB
Stream Flow: 2,292 linearfeet of perennial stream, 1,879 linear feet of intermittent stream
Wetlands: 0.69 acres.
Cowardin Class: PEM1
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non -Tidal
1

E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑✓ Field Determination. Date(s): July 14, 2015
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
0 Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
0 Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
'H Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 124,000, Kannapolta, NC (1995)
❑✓ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: Cabarrus County Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑✓ Photographs: ❑✓ Aerial (Name & Date): Esri, accessed 2015 or
❑� Other (Name & Date): Site photographs of the wetlands and streams
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
2

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
'that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply'
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). lf, ,during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "maybe" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site-that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later iurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
11
Z71- c�-A,&,-�
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Site
Cowardian
Latitude
Longitude
Number
Class
Stream A
35.4023650
- 80.6447930
R5UB2
Stream B
35.4023650
- 80.6447930
R4UB2
Stream C
35.402365°
I - 80.644793°
R41.1132
Wetland AA I
35.402365°
I - 80.644793°
I PEM1
Wetland BB I
35.402365°
I - 80.644793°
I PEM1
Wetland CC I
35.402365°
I - 80.644793°
jI PEM1
I
1
Estimated
Amount of
Aquatic
Resource in
Review Area
2,292 If
1,772 If
107 If
0.02 acre
0.t)4 acre
0.63 acre
Class of Aquatic
Resource
non - section 10 non -tidal
non - section 10 non -tidal
non - section 10 -- non -tidal
non - section 10 -- wetland
non - section 10 -- wetland
non - section 10 -- wetland

of WATER
Office Use Only.
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
Corps:
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number. 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401
because written approval is not required? Certification-
El Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
2. Project Information
2a Name of project: Weddington Walk
2b. County. Cabarrus
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Concord
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state N/A
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: multiple
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if N/A
applicable) -
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip.
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
/1 •
For the record only for Corps Permit.
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is- ❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Mattamy Homes
4b. Name: Mr. Bob Wiggins
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
Mattamy Homes
2127 Ayrsley Town Blvd , Suite 201
Charlotte, NC 28273
(704) 604 -8424
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Gregg Antemann, PWS
5b. Business name Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
(if applicable):
5c. Street address: 550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Charlotte, NC 28273
704 - 408 -1683
704 - 527 -1133
gregg @cws- inc.net
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID)
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
1c. Property size:
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
56009548920000 ,56009536900000,and
56009496710000
Latitude. 35.402365
80.644793
(DD.DDDDDD)
103 acres
Coddle Creek
C
Yadkin (HUC 03040105)
Longitude: -
11��
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site consists of undeveloped forested areas and maintained agricultural fields. Typical on -site vegetation includes
hackberry (Celtis occidentalis), eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), willow oak (Quercus phellos), sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua), slippery elm (Ulmus rubra), Carolina shagbark hickory (Carya carolinae - septentrionalis),
Nepalese browntop (Microstegium vimineum), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), sawtooth blackberry (Rubus
argutus), and Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia).
According to the Soil Survey of Cabarrus County (Figures 3 and 4, attached), on -site soils consist of Armenia loam, 0 to
2 percent slopes, rarely flooded (ArA), Iredell loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (IdA), Mecklenburg loam, 2 to 8 and 8 to 15
percent slopes (MeB and MeD, respectively. Armenia loam (ArA) is listed as hydric and Iredell loam (IdA) is listed as
having hydric inclusions in the North Carolina Hydric Soils List for Cabarrus County . Both Armenia loam and Iredell loam
are listed as hydric soils on the National Hydric Soils List for Cabarrus County.
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property.
0.69 ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
2,292 linear feet of perennial stream channel, 1879 linear feet of seasonal stream channel.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to develop approximately 103 acres of property into a single - family subdivision located in
Concord, North Carolina (Figure 6, attached). Concord is experiencing rapid population growth due its proximity to
Huntersville, Kannapolis, and north Charlotte and there is a need for residential housing in order to meet the current demand.
This project is not a phased project and adjoining subdivisions are all owned by individuals and /or companies not associated
with the Weddington Walk project.
Road crossings are unavoidable in order to develop the site while meeting local planning ordinances requiring appropriate
emergency vehicle access to all parts of the subdivision (Figure 6, attached).
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used.
Under Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 29, unavoidable permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters associated with this
project are limited to a total of 230 linear feet (If) of jurisdictional stream channel (Stream A and Stream B). Impacts to
Streams A and B are the result of the construction of three road crossings and one road crossing culvert extension
(Crossings # 1 -4). Figure 6 (attached) depicts the proposed subdivision layout overview. Please see the cover letter for
more detailed descriptions.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? El Yes ®No El Unknown
Comments:
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? El Preliminary El Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company:
Name (if known). Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
6b. If yes, explain.
❑ Yes ® No
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non -404, other) (acres)
Temporary (T)
W1 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
❑ No
❑ DWQ
® DWQ
S2 ® P ❑ T
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
S3 ®P ❑ T
Culvert
Stream B ❑ PER
® INT
❑ No
❑ DWQ
Culvert
Stream A ® PER
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ INT
® DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Corps
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ INT
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
230
3i. Comments:
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including
temporary impacts)
proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a 3b. 3c
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T Culvert Stream A
® PER
® Corps
4 -5
70
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
❑ INT
® DWQ
S2 ® P ❑ T
Culvert
Stream A ® PER
❑ INT
® Corps 4 -5 65
® DWQ
S3 ®P ❑ T
Culvert
Stream B ❑ PER
® INT
® Corps 3 -4 70
® DWQ
S4 ® P ❑ T
Culvert
Stream A ® PER
® Corps 4 -5 25
extension
❑ INT
® DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream
and tributary impacts
230
3i. Comments:
Permanent impacts to jurisdictionial
streams total 230 linear feet.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated I Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑'Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no'
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
51. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑Tar- Pamlico ❑Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number— Reason
Permanent (P) or for
Temporary (T) impact
B1 ❑P ❑T
B2 ❑P ❑T
B3 ❑P ❑T
6i. Comments:
Buffer
Stream name mitigation
required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
(square feet) (square feet)
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable. Proper sediment
and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters Construction activities and
impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will comply with all conditions of Nationwide Permit 29 and Water Quality
Certification No. 3890. All work will be constructed in the dry. Impacts have been limited to less than 300 If of jurisdictional
stream channel and no impacts to jurisdictional wetlands are proposed.
In an attempt to minimize impacts to jurisdictional waters while still meeting the goals of the project, a "No Build" alternative
was considered. The property was purchased for the purpose of providing residential housing to meet the growth and
demand of an area in Concord experiencing significant population growth. A "No Build" option would not meet the project
goals of providing necessary housing to meet the current demand. Therefore, the No Build Alternative was eliminated from
further consideration.
Impacts were reduced through the use of headwalls at the inlets and outlets of the proposed culverts in order to minimize the
lengths required for the proposed crossings. All proposed culverts will be buried one foot below the existing stream bed to
maintain aquatic life passage and low flows. All proposed culverts were also designed to maintain bankful channel
dimensions. Energy dissipaters, such as rip rap aprons, are unnecessary due to the culvert designs. Additionally, the location
of an existing culvert was utilized to reduce impacts by 20 feet (Figures 6 and 10)
The project has been thoughtfully designed to avoid impacts wherever possible. The currently proposed site plan was
developed as a result of this alternatives analysis and avoidance and minimization process. We believe that the current site
plan is the best possible plan that meets the project goals while avoiding impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. to the
greatest extent practicable.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable. This site was
chosen for the project due its minimal impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U S. Proper sediment and erosion control
measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. Construction activities and impacts to on -site
jurisdictional waters project will comply with all conditions of Nationwide Permit 29 and Water Quality Certification No. 3890.
All work will be constructed in the dry.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
® Yes ❑ No
® DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
® Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Type I Quantity
Page 7of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 230 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ® warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested- acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h Comments:
Page 8of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? >24 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why-
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Stormwater Management Plan will be submitted to City of Concord, a certified local government reviewer and a letter of
approval will be submitted to NCDWR once approved.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Certified Local Government
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
City of Concord
® Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ® No
❑
Coastal counties
❑
HQW
❑
0 R
❑
Session Law 2006 -246
❑
Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA /SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No
2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project will not result in additional future development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sewer will tie into existing infrastructure.
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
CWS performed a data review using North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer on September
28, 2015 to determine the presence of any federally - listed, candidate endangered, threatened species or critical habitat
located within the project area. Based on this review, there are no records of federally - protected species within the
project limits or within a mile of the project site. A copy of the data review report is attached.
The Northern long -eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) is one of the species of bats most impacted by the white -nose
syndrome disease. Habitat for the Northern long -eared bat includes forested areas of any age, rocky areas with
boulders, and culverts greater than four feet wide Due to recent population declines of almost 89% caused by white -
nose syndrome and continued spread of the disease, the Northern long -eared bat now receives protection as a
Threatened species under the Endangered Species Act. A Threatened species is defined as a taxon likely to become
endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range .
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ( USFWS) is requesting the documentation of amount of wooded acres cleared in
connection with any construction project that takes place within any county shown on the June 30, 2015 White -Nose
Syndrome Buffer Zone Map, attached. This project takes place within the Northern long -eared bat habitat range. Due to
the nature of this subdivision construction project, approximately 70 acres of wooded area will be cleared for this project
and may trigger the need for a bat survey. Please note that physical surveying for potential habitat within this project has
not been included in this scope at this time.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Fisheries: http: / /sharpfin.nmfs. noaa. gov /website /EFH_Mapper /map.aspx
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A letter was forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on September 29, 2015 to determine the
presence of any areas of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that would be affected by the project. In a
response letter dated October 13, 2015, the SHPO states that they "are aware of no historic resources which would be
affected by the project'. A copy of the SHPO response letter is attached. CWS also consulted the SHPO online GIS
service database and found no sites of architectural, historical, or archaeological significance within the project limits.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? ❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM No. 3710560000J and 3710561000J
r
Mr. Gregg Antemann, PWS 10 -15 -2015
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided )
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 f J
Date: '�- 1 f �6 Proj9ctlSite: �/(a,�ctpvt.�,ro W,, j j< Latitude:
Evaluator: 4v 4 Q,1:L )3 County: CJ%Yvys Longitude: -9b. OPP 2
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle Other ,S tp
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral Intermittent erennial e.g. quad Name:
if? 19 orperennial if? 30*
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 100 1
No
Absent
Weak
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
0
1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
0
1
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
0
1
ripple -pool sequence
No = 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
1.5
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
5. Active /relict floodplain
( 0
(D
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
8. Headcuts
0
1
9. Grade control
0
0.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
f 11. Second or greater order channel
No
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions In manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal
i
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
0
14. Leaf lifter
eD
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
17. Soif -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
C. Biology (Subtotal = 3.5
Strong
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
i
i 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
C3 i
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
22. Fish
eD
23. Crayfish
0
24. Amphibians
3
25. Algae
a) �
26. Wetland plants in streambed
1.5
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual.
j Notes:
I
Sketch:
Moderate
Strong
.03
2
Q)
0
3
2
3
2
3
2
a) �
1.5
f
1.5
Yes = 3
I
1 2� 3
1 2 3
1 0.5 0
0.5 1 5
J 1 1.5
Yes
2 1 0
2 1 f 0
U 2 i 3
1 1 2 3
0.5 1 I 1.5
Qj 1 i 1.5
0.5 1 1.5
0.5 1 1.5
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: �1 J1S ProjectlSite:tiVtjjtivk." kl',I4 Latitude: E. q-ozs&S
Evaluator: ` V 9 I- g-05 County:
/ l �wrJc. ,.v4S Longitude:-.
Total Points: I Stream Determination (circle one) Other Sip
Stream is at least intermittent 2 2 • Ephemeral ntermittent erennial e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 orperennial if? 30*
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 15 )
Absent
Weak
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
I 0
( 1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
23. Crayfish
I 0
24. Amphibians
1
ripple -pool sequence
26. Wetland plants in streambed
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
I 1
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
(ia
7. Recent alluvial deposits
®
1
8. Headcuts
0
11
9. Grade control
0
(0,5
10. Natural valley
0
11. Second or greater order channel
f
No
a artificial ditches are not rated; see di cussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = I S )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 1
14. Leaf litter 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0.5
17 Soil -based evidence of high water table? ( No = 0
C. Biology (Subtotal = l
_�
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
f 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
L0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
22. Fish
E qv)
23. Crayfish
24. Amphibians
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual.
I Notes:
Sketch:
Moderate
(1�
2
2
2
1
1 1
Strong
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1.5
1.5
Yes = 3
2 3
2 3
0.5 0
1 1.5
1 1.5
Yes =(3
0 1
2 1
1 2
1 2
0.5 1
0.5 1
0.5 1
0.5 1
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

NC DWQ3Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: i' iJ (S Project/Site: f1Vt".bf v, Latitude: S 2
Evaluator: �f7 t� County: Longitude:
Total Points: �7 /( Stream Determination (GIrcle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral termitten Perennial e.g. Quad Name: Sc p
if ? 19 or perennial if a 30 *
A. Geornorphology (Subtotal=
Absent
I Weak
Moderate
Strong
13 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
(
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
I 1
3
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
f 0
1
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
©
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
©
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
(iJ
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =f'Q]
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
$
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = }
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
` 0
I 2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
3
14. Leaf litter
.47D
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
q
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5
4 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
I
No = 0
Yes
C. Biology (Subtotal = '3- )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
, 1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
I 0
©
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
' 2
3
22, Fish
Q
( 0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
,®„ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET ,_-
SCP 1 -- Stream A
Provide the following information for the stream reach underassessment:
1. Applicant's name: ��1� ^'�( / T � 2. Evaluator's name: 14V 14 J_
3. Date of evaluation: 1 )
/ 15 4. Time of evaluation: - OU a "~
n
5. Name of stream:
6. River basin: y`' k ifvt 36 (f t 65 }
7. Approximate drainage area: ^' 0 a G1-GS 8. Stream order: lS�
9. Length of reach evaluated: 2 �- 2 10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any)):: ^
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3 5. 4H>2-50 Longitude (ex.- 77.556611): ou r r,If Q ' r
Method location determined (circle): GP Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
�cS )f J1 r ny 1 of �j'r t(o1Lt•� o WA
14. Proposed channel work (if any): //6
15. Recent weather conditions: G CIL �Q S
16. Site conditions at time of visit: C �" '4A �'"� DuJs
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or Iake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 0 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? TE NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? �5 NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 14 % Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
% Forested Z d% Cleared / Logged % Other l
22. Bankfull width: 3— !1t't
23, Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2— "
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) entl 2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight ccasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores `should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): J 1� Comments:
Evaluator's Signature ��!i'��"` Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET; SCPJ
strew" A
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2
_`i.�,e — °�,n -- -� ".i :. _ " �:� _ "�, "max..` -f•���s `..� -
�:;��° " �`✓' -�;�� -_ =:�:<, _ - -_ _ - �f= ,,asp- =� >�. - _ - - _ -

USACE AID# DWQ # Site ff (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
SCP Z -- Stream
Provide the following information "�for the stream reach under assessment:
1. AppIicant's name: �� 44r- -,( 2. Evaluator's name: ,4YH � EMS
3. Date of evaluation: 11I 4. Time of evaluation: �"
S. Name of stream: S te`^ 6. River basin: %4 d k,+-,
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order: ! S*
9. Length of reach evaluated: 10. County: �C 'vwS
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any)::
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): J 5. �16 Z 3 6 S Longitude (ex.- 77.556611): - ),
Method location determined (circle): GP Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
LVCi -lilt �aK �•�s -� o 'r1 L° �7aa 1Z t 4- ^ec�
14. Proposed channel work (if any): N� v
15. Recent weather conditions: (
16. Site conditions at time of visit: C
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10
Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES G If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? (ES ) NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: l) % Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
91>/o Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other
i
22. Bankfull width: Z — 3 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): Z
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) J2entee (2 t 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight ccasional be Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 39 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature / `� , /T Date_ I ( l I ! S
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of- stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is- subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET; SCP 2
d�
(nollowor- saturation
= ��;- _-= '.(rio'liifi'et -,wa0 conti�uous�wi
1.�
.,4 arpp
Gxouni waterii
`___ F "i<; � r :', r:� �._> r_ =r,`t �� =; _ "`_:;•�.�_.` _ � ; §:a � mss,'. Y:4:'7..,.
uo tloo_d` lain`;`* O eacfenslyl!p
,
- - - _ �- )Cntrez�chment %�1100�
ien
�.ee"I •en ch
Presence of ad7ace:
T)i
owe fig,
ands� '.,,�0;_,la�ge;adiace�t
�• :�.;���:�;r};T�,,� ,. �,. �Cliannelsinti
. - � >' -.`` =_ :eXtensiye channel�zation�- :0;`nah
i
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams,
fireanri �'
-
t, - -
'ri
2
lX. R s•�� -
-
_
_
-
-
.g,
a wits
-
Z
�:
l
ruiax:' `oints'
1
a7i ".OiI1tSu = - - z!
az'�•
Q
ax� -
-
raj
-
- —
` "oinfs� -
- - -
- -- _ -
rli
_
4
Z
- -
`ct on =�` -
a
`'oirits�
P -. ,o, t
RM
- ;tii,.
;
•!Ts
;e� -
=
-s;; = _,.,,
�•
Via
"i1i= -
- .;l`...,
-' -
~F�
Y s�
;:p�' `4}:•s "�- — >`�= `_`�:'
2
,x:.0.,._•.4=
;.ha, �'E;j
.�T:z: - -
ii.�: _ ^:hy... ��`7 ��.�; k. :- �'jtt;,y ;.• i.l =�
/�
f-
i
73

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map) 1
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET ,.•
SCP 3 -- Stream <
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: � 4c to 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: / �% s 4. Time of evaluation: 3• S^
5. Name of stream: S+S C 6. River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area: ^- 0 , S 'a cc-C4 9. Length of reach evaluated: / V I 1-14
11. Site coordinates (if known): (� C/ prefer in decimal degrees.
<
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3 J. l % J
8. Stream order: 1 S
10. County: t!G�x �YvS
12. Subdivision name (if any): t��
Longitude (ex.- 77.556611): " D b. 6 q�-� 9 3
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
4L-t.
�
14. Proposed channel work (if any): N
15. Recent weather conditions: ( t6l. o/1
16. Site conditions at time of visit: t 1 -,$ d� 9 6 s
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake Iocated upstream of the evaluation point? YES 4 00 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES ZVO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential % Commercial % Industrial $ ? % Agricultural
IS % Forested �% Cleared / Logged % Other
22. Bankfull width: 2 3 1 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 5
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) ent (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >I 0 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: trai Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 3 5L- Comments:
EvaIuator's Signature r / ' ` X Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to`�e used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to matte a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -- version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919 -876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET; SCP
4
K
IP202,
rrsa S
q'� p �"wvg'� wo,
-- Vfow,=
t6fa Quits, i,
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
H- ME I
Y"

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: 1R/�"`,,fJt'tilf-,-.N walk, City/County: CckX er's Sampling Date:
Applicantlowner: Ali ff° -s State: /fir(. Sampling Point:
,
Investigator(s): �Jof Lf y� > S Section, Township, Range: Co"l-ro'A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):: /t lit c- t [Local relief (concave, convex, none): ^0y 4, q Slope ( %): U��r2
Subregion (LRR or LcR J LaL 3 �• T V 2 3& S
Long: - O v• r' ` r 3 Datum:A✓4 A 0 3
Soil Map Unit Name: f i<°�'�"� �' Z��' s �'XCC S C r f NWI classification: IV4
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes k— No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transectsoMportant features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No r
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes - No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
(J a +C1 J9 0,V,.
HYDROLOGY
Of )too, .tlLPOA- l
Wetland Hydrology indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary indicators (minimum of one is reouired:
check all that auDly)
— Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
— Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
�C Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
}C Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
— Iron Deposits (135)
Geomorphic Position (132)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
k Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes is No
Depth (Inches) /0— Q Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes -V No
(Includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
//1 d, << A,,,, S 4,j v-cf�,4 h �� vc n c SLR -F.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Version 2.0

US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
DPI - wo 4,
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
3
1,
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2'
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: {B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species J�
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: GUv (A /B)
6.
7
Prevalence index worksheet:
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multipiv bv:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapfina /Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
ACV
FACW species x 2 =
1 2wX''k S l SV 4�`tt
l /
FAC species x 3 =
2 50- fi( itsIf�
FACU species x 4 =
3
UPL species x 5 =
4
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence index = B!A =
6.
H drophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
B.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
i{%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
J_j n C S C' {a/�_$
U,`
OV ljftty
-
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
N OI'i
3. S� lr t o S,
�V N AM
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
N
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling /shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9•
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10.
m) tall.
11.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
r r) = Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3,28 ft tall.
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woodv Vine Stratum {Plot size: )
height.
1.
2
3.
4'
Hydrophytic
5.
Vegetation
= Total Cover
Present? Yes No
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate
sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile De
Depth
(inches)
I -1-
?-- ZU
scription: (Describe to the del
Matrix
Color (moist) %
r � Y� �1► 93J
Sampling Point:1�
)th needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
SX Sf j �� C it c!C, l.-.
k
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL =Pore Linino, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
— Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
,_,., Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
— Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (AS)
— Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (176)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
— Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1713) (MLRA 136, 122)
3indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
-Al
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
11 vii cc+ �� S
�� �b c soy rs
a rn �
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region f
Project/Site: ��"`/�r� ,) �U r City /County: & ti� WS Sampling Date: �! ����"
/ '� } ^ ? CS State: y<. Sampling Point: 0� —t 41D•!zy
Applicant/Owner: f
Investigator(s): �-�`` Section, Township, Range: CO's Go aa{
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): , << Local relief (concave, convex, none): t g Slope ( /%")': 7 - ' o
22
DSubregion (LRR or MR / 3 4 Lat: 3 Z Long: atum:
Soil Map Unit Name: sirs 01, ^ NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes -A No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Remarks:
C�4_0\ 0114 'h 4-
HYDROLOGY
No > Is the Sampled Area
No k within a wetland? Yes
No,_X_
No
-1 -
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired: check
all that aoolv)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
— Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (131)
_, Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
.— Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (CB)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
— Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _
Water Table Present? Yes _
Saturation Present? Yes _
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gau
Remarks:
No Depth (inches):
=No Depth (inches): L
No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No /�
3e, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -- Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
SaDl' a_ /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1. (J to rt t,}a+ vl'S�c t q
2. ✓ stn � f U. S vi Y 51L 1i •:
3. 7
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. /�-& -5 c,,"�" S
2. Solt A « -f
3. r�oS_(5 /tip r,�tjccab
4. )t„-.0
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sampling Point: a `
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
17-0 = Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20% of total cover:
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
heiqht.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
00-e- rli c
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No A,
vcf��_ 4vj,Q,o
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: MultiDIV bv:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test far Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
= Total Cover
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
80 (� l7�{U
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
z V ;V A A
N A
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
17-0 = Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20% of total cover:
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
heiqht.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
00-e- rli c
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No A,
vcf��_ 4vj,Q,o
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling PointA
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
Cinches) Color (_moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LocZ Texture Remarks
a—CD" rU Y,<
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS-Masked Sand Grams. zLocation:
PL =Pore Lininq, M= Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
— Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_, Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
— Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
— 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (176)
— Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
— Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
___, Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Remarks:
XY0 ,t,,W�Ca 4­6 �
0 r
7'-, 1� �AYZ- 96YZ&
No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

4
.S.
?, a
State Historic
Preservation Office
NATURAL AND
CULTURAL RESOURCES
October 13, 2015
Aliisa Harjuniemi
Carolina Wetland Services
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
Ramona M. Bartos
Administrator
Re: Develop Weddington Road Subdivision, Weddington Road and Rock Hill Church Road,
Concord, CWS 2015 -3681, Cabarrus County, ER 15 -2272
Dear Ms. Harjuniemi:
Thank you for your letter of September 29, 2015, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill - Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579 or
env ironmental .review(a,ncdcr.fzov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
b5l" Ramona M. Bartos
Nothing Compares
State ot'North Carohna I Depai tmcnt of Natnr.11 and CUIUlTal Resources
State Historic Picservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh. NC 27699 -4617
919 807 6579 T 1 919 807 6599 P

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Office of Land and Water Stewardship
Pat Mc Cory Bryan Gossage Donald R. van der lfaart
Governor Diector Secretary
September 28, 2015
Aliisa Harjuniemi
Carolina Wetland Services
550 E Westinghouse Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28273
aliisa @cws- inc.net
RE- Weddington Road Site; 2015 -3681
Dear Aliisa Harjuniemi:
NCNHDE -755
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources from our database that have been compiled for the project referenced
above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there
are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation /managed
areas within the proposed project boundary.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have
been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records
suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable
habitat exists and is included for reference. Please note that although there may be no documentation of
natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area
may not have been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for site - specific surveys
where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records. Tables of natural areas and conservation /managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning,
project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory
decisions Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written
notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications
Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally - listed species are documented near the
project area.
Thank you for your inquiry If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need
additional assistance, please contact Allison Schwarz Weakley at allison.weaklevna ncdenr.aov or
919.707.8629 -
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Page 1 of 3

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Weddington Road Site
Project No. 2015 -3681
September 28, 2015
NCNHDE -755
No Element Occurrences are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed' Area .Nam -e Owner `' Owner °Type
Cabarrus County Open Space Cabarrus County: multiple local government Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at baps // ncnhde .natureserve.ora /content/helQ. Data query generated on September 28, 2015, source NCNHP, Q3 July 2015. Please resubmit
your information request if more than one year elapses before protect initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-755: Weddington Road Site
September 28, 2015
❑ Project Boundary
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
E:] Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 3 of 3
JV
1:25,012
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 Mi
0 0 .325 0.65 1.3 km
Sources E',. HERE, DI—. Int-IM.P. i_, P Corp., GEBCO,
USGS. FAO NPS. NRCAN, G-B.-, IGN, Kd.,t. NL. Od-- Suva.

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
-� Northern d Long-Eared Bat Interim 4
g ()
Rule
White -Nose Syndrome Buffer Zone Around WNS /Pd Positive Counties /Districts
Awl,
-
Map Created June 30, 2015
vJ
Counties /Districts with WNS /Pd
Infected Hibernacula
White -Nose Syndrome Buffer Zone
Per Interim 4(d) Rule
�1 U.S. counties within 150 miles of positive
_J counties /districts (Data as of 06/30/15,
" additional updates expected)
Northern Long -Eared Bat Range
(As of 0413012015)
�s
Northern Long -Eared Bat range and WNS Buffer
Zone subject to change as new data are collected.
WNS = White -Nose Syndrome
Pd = Pseudogymnoascus destructans; the
r fungus that causes WNS
0 r` -150 300 450 600 `� t.. Coordinate System: WNS Counties /Districts Data Provided By:
r North America Equidistant Conic Pennsylvania Game Commission
Miles Datum: North American 1983 Basemap Data: USGS

Weddington Walk October 15, 2015
Pre - Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WOC 3890 CWS Proiect No. 2015 -3681
Photograph A. View of Perennial Stream A. facing downstream.
Photograph B. View of Intermittent Stream B. facing upstream

Weddington Walk October 15, 2015
Pre - Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WOC 3890 CWS Pro iect No. 2015 -3681
Photograph C. View of Intermittent Stream C, facing upstream
Photograph D. View of Wetland AA, facing southwest

Weddington Walk October 15, 2015
Pre - Construction Notification to Nationwide Permit No. 29 and WOC 3890 CWS Proiect No. 2015 -3681
Photograph E. View of Wetland BB, facing northwest.
Photograph F. View of Wetland CC, facing east.

NOTES:
UNADJUSTED RA71D OF PRECISION: 1:30,493
PORTIONS OF SUBJECT TRACT ARE GRAPHICALLY LOCATED WITHIN THE 100
YEAR FLOODPLAIN PER FEMA FIRM MAP NUMBER 3710560000J AND
3710561000J WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF NOVEMBER 5, 2008.
WETLANDS AND STREAM DELINEATION BY CAROLINA WETLANDS SERVICES.
THIS PLAT REPRESENTS A WETLAND SURVEY AND IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A
BOUNDARY SURVEY. BOUNDARY INFORMATION TAKEN FROM PREVIOUS
SURVEY BY ESP ASSOCIATES, P.A. ENTITLED, "BOUNDARY SURVEY OF TAX
PARCELS 5600 -94 -9671, 5600 -95 -4892, 5600 -95 -3690. DATED AUGUST
27, 2015.
WETLANDS SURVEY COMPLETED JULY & AUGUST, 2015
AREA COMPUTED BY COORDINATE METHOD.
THIS PROPERTY MAY BE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS
OR RIGHTS —OF —WAY.
SUBJECT TRACT TAX PARCELS 5600 -94 -9671, 5600 -95 -4892,
5600 -95 -3690
SUBJECT TRACT DEED REFERENCE: DB 401 PG 204, OB 618 PG 553, DS
2323 PG 155, DB 748 PG 79
LINE TABLES ON SHEETS 10 THRU 11
PID# 5600 -74 -6614
JANE ELIZABETH M
DB 1043 PG 11 -12
LEGEND
RPW — RELATIVELY PERMANENT WATERS
RCP — REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
PID# — PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
DB — DEED BOOK
MB — MAP BOOK
PG — PAGE
SF — SQUARE FEET
AC — ACRES
(S - SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE
-- ADJOINING BOUNDARY LINE
RIGHT OF WAY LINE
SS SS SS - SANITARY SEWER LINE
TOP OF BANK
—X x X x -- FENCE LINE
— JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
— LINEAR WETLAND
This drawing and /or the design shown are the property of ESP_ Associates, P.A. The
reproduction, alteration, copying or other use of this drawing without .their written
consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action.
ESP Associates, P.A.
ESP Associates. P.A.
P O. Box 7030
Charlotte. NC 25241
3475 LaLM= 81,C
Fut Mill. SC 29703
F.%. P 704. 593-4949 0,0
503 - 802-2440 GO
a„u c�pasiocutacan
to o m
c
nC�
u;
1
PID# 5600 -95 -4892
GLEN H. BARR
DB 618 PG 553
;1 I
X I
Cam,
\%\
MOSS
/ PID# 5600 -95 -3690
GLEN H. BARR
DB 618 PG 553
W
PID# 5600 -
A S.
MR 61
JURISDICTIONA
1 WETLANDS
JURISDICTIONAL 1
TRIBUTARY RP-
(SEASONAL)
;HEET_ 6
SDICTION
ETLANDS
U
PID# 5600 -96 -9644 /
LAUREL PARK PROPERTY
OWNERS ASSOCIATION, /
INC PID# 5610 -06 -3601
DB 8530 PG 314 / GREGORY S. CANNON
MB 53 PG 45 DB 429 PG /
LOTS 106 -11313, ,
MB 13 PG 44
n o
t3 ° x
\ OUT RN HOMES, INC ° A
SOUTHERN HOMES, IN �'^
LOTS 36 -38, MB 14 PC 1 PID# 5610 -06 -8852 m
SOUTHERN HOMES, INC & u °
PATRICIA F. JETTER a o
/ DB 10093 PG 204
LOTS 4 THRU. 35 MB 14 PG 1
SHEET 8
SHEET 7L*
.'SHEE Ks
NOW OR FORMERLY
CRESTVIEW SECT. III
MB I6PCE55
JURISDICTIONAL '� 1
----- TRIBUTARY RPW , JURISDICTIONAL P
(SEASONAL) / / IBUTARY RPW .
(PERENNIAL) \
0
-� N
1M
SHEET 4 E r �\
L
kK-
PID# 5660 -94 -9671
\L EDNA S. BARR J I
DB 401 PG 204,
\ DS 748 PG 79 1
I \
` 411
� �1 G
C D EIFI LU11T
SUMMERHILL
50' PUBLIC R/W I
B MB 24 PG 65 1
t V
�'FpUBUC EDDiNGTON ROAD TMSR# 1431
R/W
MAINTANCE RIGHT OF WAY
(BACK OF DITCH TO BACK OF DITCH)
NO CONVEYANCE OF RECORD FOUND
Q` SEAL
L 3635
VICINITY MAP NO SCALE
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE
BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT AS
DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANCE IN
THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THE DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404
JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE (5) YEARS
FROM THIS DATE. THIS UNDERSIGNED COMPLETED THIS DETERMINATION WAS
UTILIZING THE APPROPRIATE REGIONAL SUPPLEMENT TO THE 1987 U.S. ARMY
CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL."
REGULATORY OFFICIAL
jC�:)f -7
DATE
USACE ACTION ID
WETLANDS SURVEY OF TAX PARCELS# s
5600 -94 -9671, 5600 -95 -4892, 5600 -95 -3690 I t =400'
aor,
LOCATED 1N: NO 2 TOWNSHIP, CITY OF CONCORD, 9/14/15
CABARRUS COUNTY, NORTH CAROI,,INA of v" No.
�utn 1: MATTAMY HOMES Ds05.800.WE lM0
21278 AYRSIEY TOWN BLVD. SUITE 201 ,loo no.
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 05052100.000 Lq
WSH
RoJ Ib. I Dadpned ey I pa+e By I ProjrKt —Ynpr. I CItK1md ey I
ad 11
ip
°
s
LICENSE NO.
'
C -0587
i
'
°
Q
S_
�''4 9 .. • '�,•�o�
a.._SSOCIP� _ ,.•
Q` SEAL
L 3635
VICINITY MAP NO SCALE
"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE
BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT AS
DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANCE IN
THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THE DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404
JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE (5) YEARS
FROM THIS DATE. THIS UNDERSIGNED COMPLETED THIS DETERMINATION WAS
UTILIZING THE APPROPRIATE REGIONAL SUPPLEMENT TO THE 1987 U.S. ARMY
CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS DELINEATION MANUAL."
REGULATORY OFFICIAL
jC�:)f -7
DATE
USACE ACTION ID
WETLANDS SURVEY OF TAX PARCELS# s
5600 -94 -9671, 5600 -95 -4892, 5600 -95 -3690 I t =400'
aor,
LOCATED 1N: NO 2 TOWNSHIP, CITY OF CONCORD, 9/14/15
CABARRUS COUNTY, NORTH CAROI,,INA of v" No.
�utn 1: MATTAMY HOMES Ds05.800.WE lM0
21278 AYRSIEY TOWN BLVD. SUITE 201 ,loo no.
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 05052100.000 Lq
WSH
RoJ Ib. I Dadpned ey I pa+e By I ProjrKt —Ynpr. I CItK1md ey I
ad 11

This drawing and /or the design shown are the property of ESP Associates, P.A. The
reproduction, alteration, copying or other use of this drawing without their written
consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action.
io /-7
I �A
1 $ �
i� VICINITY MAP
�ti�,tiFs
`OFFS
7,
16sv
�O
f
�f
r7
NO SCALE
BAR SCALE 1 " =50'
0 25 50 100
WETLANDS SURVEY OF TAX PARCELS# 'i«
5600 -94 -9671, 5600 -95 -4892, 5800 -95 -3690 1" = 50'
oom
6Ul:Amv 1N: NU L 1011NSMW, kill UP CU14wa, 9/14/15
CABARRUS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 01.0►w.
,UULN I: MATTAMY HOMES osos.e WERMo
21278 AYRSLEY TOWN BLVD. SUITE 201 +b W
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA OS05AX MM ul
arolea No. I Dapnae W I 0r W I Pm,.d -M qr• I a"du° �2 I 11
n
N
J
114
JURISDICTIONAL
WETLAND G"
'
ci rn
,g�
24610 SF _ ry01
0565 AC
/ryar
JURISDICTIONAL
/
WETLANDS "F"
2773 SF
/�22
0.064 AC
J2
L2�$
/
N N
J
/••.
/
''
�1�
N
••
40-
N
N
IL b,
/JURISDICTIONAL
RPW .00
a
/
/SEASONAL
2228 SF
F\ / 0.051 AC,,
F\
%/
/ �/� yam/ /�y
_
/••
This drawing and /or the design shown are the property of ESP Associates, P.A. The
reproduction, alteration, copying or other use of this drawing without their written
consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action.
io /-7
I �A
1 $ �
i� VICINITY MAP
�ti�,tiFs
`OFFS
7,
16sv
�O
f
�f
r7
NO SCALE
BAR SCALE 1 " =50'
0 25 50 100
WETLANDS SURVEY OF TAX PARCELS# 'i«
5600 -94 -9671, 5600 -95 -4892, 5800 -95 -3690 1" = 50'
oom
6Ul:Amv 1N: NU L 1011NSMW, kill UP CU14wa, 9/14/15
CABARRUS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 01.0►w.
,UULN I: MATTAMY HOMES osos.e WERMo
21278 AYRSLEY TOWN BLVD. SUITE 201 +b W
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA OS05AX MM ul
arolea No. I Dapnae W I 0r W I Pm,.d -M qr• I a"du° �2 I 11

G,-"*y.-
A'•ii� iii �i1'
� ia••t,�r�ad yy
r•i ++a� {i *•isA•
��O�s aiisa•�s%'�i�•V�
��Ai �s�� ��� s��•s1��
�•`.•aa�� � s
spa
.tea•' �
ESP Associates. PA.
P.O. Box 7030
charlotic, nc 24241
3475 Wimont B1%d
Fort \LIL SC 29706
704-593-4949 (NO
803-802-2440 (SO
u iin espassocwto.can
SFF
syF�T �
O
7.7
,
I / y
1 '
iti
� / I
lo 10
I
Iz
O s��
K-
I ss/ / s
F S
i
o - ' yFFT
Q-
J ,zip
/ •• .� X56
i 5 le
•'�y� 1-55
5 _
� � �, � ' ,5 JURISDICTIONAL
/ /�Z L5 PERENNIAL RPW
CC "e"
9379 SF
0.215 AC
' L429 I
L202 L43 /�p1
� A
J � 4
L45 r 3
;
M U
J 0a _
CO -_I Z
N ;a
M
w
in
6 ::E C
-U 7a
M
w�N
JURISDICTIONAL
PERENNIAL RPW
"A"
14,254 SF
0.327 AC
L36
This drawing and /or the design shown are the property of ESP Associates, P.A. The
reproduction, alteration, copying or other use of this drawing without their written
consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action.
ESP Associates, P.A.
R'
a
�I
.O N .. CA....
LICENSE NO.
C-0587
%(��A ........ •' QQ'
. • �q1
yr
VICINITY MAP NO SCALE
°� NF
��FF S'SF
FT
A
O,
BAR SCALE 1 " =50'
0 25 50 100
PETLANDS SURVEY OF TAX PARCELS#
WOO-94-9671. 5800 -95 -4892, 5800 -95 -3690
WLAILU 1N: NU Z 1'OWNJ'HIY, l; n Ur" CUALU1tU,
CABARRUS COUNTY` NORTH CAROLINA
_ILN I: MATTAMY HOMES
21278 AYRSLEY TOWN BLVD. SUITE 201
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLMA
WSH I ROB
Pjsd No. I Dedp»d By I orw By PMJWt —Negr. I CbW:W By
seek
1' =50'
aet+
9/14/15
Dra" No.
osos.sooestuaD
,bb tft
nsos.aoo.000
3 ur
I 11

��4_J
VICINITY MAP
55
_ —�
SS
NO SCALE
SS
/ /'' pr
—
f SS
SS
S } /6 JURISDICTIONAL \
PERENNIAL RPW \
9379 SF \
.6 5 0.215 AC
`64 ~oo
s"
FFT � 01-
4.1?
�•a
ESP Associates. P.A.
P.O. Boa 7030
Charlotte. NC 25241
34751zk'mont BhA
Fat Ahll, SC 29708
704 - 533.4949 (NO
ESP 60-802-2440 (SO
U U U.espa&vmtc5 can
This drawing and /or the desi n shown ore the pro erty of ESP Associates, P.A. The
reproduction, alteration, copying or other use of this drawing without their written
consent is prohibited and any infringement w81 be subject to legal action.
ESP Associates, P.A.
X20
►` =o�'�N CARS </,9%
LICENSE NO.
C-0587
y
.............. Al
\
\
BAR SCALE 1 " =50'
A
0 25 50 100
SEAL WETLANDS SURVEY OF TAX PARCELS##
r L -3635 'If! 5600 -94 -9871, 5600 -95 -4892, 5600 -95 -3690 oee = 50'
p LXAMP 1N• BU L '1U11114b Y, CAI Ur' I:UM;UXI), 9/14/15
4" CABARRUS COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA o,u.rq K.
..SUR..• • INr •
`_ ,�. utN l: MATTAMY HOMES Dsaesao.VEnAM
�'•y�T D 8 p,Fz�.• 21278 AYRMEY TOWN BLVD. SUT1'E 201 Job o.
M
CHARLOTTE. NORTH CAROLINA os05800.000
e7 / % / S Ptoje a Me I Daatpnee ei ( On.- G I P,oROJ*e --mW- CMebd By s4 ae I 11

prcy�%
PID# 5610 -06 -8852
:%4_ SOUTHERN HOMES, INC &
o� PATRICIA F. JETTER
Q° DB 10093 PG 204
LOTS 4 THRU. 35 MB 14 PG 1
PID# 5610 -06 -8852
Lg6_._._L97_•
SOUTHERN HOMES, JETTER &
DB 10093 PG 204
Lg1_—L92•L93 L94 ..� LOTS 4 THRU. 35 MB 14 PG
S5 o ��
5/55f
�SSI 1i _ — � _ NOW OR FORMERLY
` CRESTVIEW SECT. III
55 _ y, MB 16 PG E35
`
ate`ss
5 _
/`S
L83
SS / X82 JURISDICTIONAL
PERENNIAL RPW
/ 9379 SF
0.215 AC
9— LBO "
r
ro
Sye"
A0
ESP Associates. P.A.
P.O. Ba 7030
Charlotte.,NC 28241
34751akemant Bled
Fort Mdl. SC 29708
704. 583 -4949 (K1
ESP
803-502-2440 00
c'um espasswlatmcom
This drawing and /or the design shown are the property of ESP Associates, P.A. The
reproduction, alteration, copying or other use of this drawing without their written
consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action.
ESP Associates, P.A.
..•` CARO _ k,
2. •.9
LICENSE N0.
C -0587
...... QcI'
NOW OR FORMERLY
CRESTVIEW SECT. III
MB 16 PG E35
A
'L�< �
SEAL
r L- 36350:
sug
ID) 1B
Ja /7 //S
� sr
NOW OR FORMERLY
t CRESTVIEW SECT. III
F ^, \ MB 16 PG E35
BAR SCALE 1 " =50'
0 25 50 100
WETLANDS SURVEY OF TAX PARCELS# s
5600 -94 -9671, 5600 -95 -4892, 5600 -95 -3690 Dot, 50'
LAXA:rJW 1N: NU 2 T0WNStiU -*, 11,311 UP LUNIAWW, 9/14/15
r,ARARRUS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Din 0 N.
.uthfi: 'MATTAMY HOMES owa.eoowenAim
21278 AYR3LET TOWN BLVD. SUITE 201 Job No.
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA osose00000
I I WSH I RIDS I
Ptepct rw t> er Din By P- J-d -ww- a»ww er 5
de
a
GJ
BAR SCALE 1 " =50'
0 25 50 100
WETLANDS SURVEY OF TAX PARCELS# s
5600 -94 -9671, 5600 -95 -4892, 5600 -95 -3690 Dot, 50'
LAXA:rJW 1N: NU 2 T0WNStiU -*, 11,311 UP LUNIAWW, 9/14/15
r,ARARRUS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Din 0 N.
.uthfi: 'MATTAMY HOMES owa.eoowenAim
21278 AYR3LET TOWN BLVD. SUITE 201 Job No.
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA osose00000
I I WSH I RIDS I
Ptepct rw t> er Din By P- J-d -ww- a»ww er 5

No
/ NC GRID RI D
r0
as /z01 7
VICINITY MAP NO SCALE
a
I
r: c
SS
31-1 0
�lSS
124L125
ss
- - - - -- - -- — �---- -- / /
30' SSRW
- - -- � ss
SS cS c5 SS SS SS SS�SS
SS —SS LA L106 -1-107 �_
n! �...�...1 .. 0108
S 103 �-L10 .._..... _ —
�C109— L110�...
�`... LI11`
1-101 '11-102 s
\ a\ JURISDICTIONAL
SEASONAL RPW I
3068 SF
\ 0.070 AC
jjmmjqq
ESP Associates P.A.
P.O Box 7030
Charlotte NC 23241
34751dkemont Bhd
Fort hUIL SC 29703
P 704-5&3-4949 (NO
F \.
503 - 302 -2440 (SO
uun•.etpass
ocwteicwn
This drawing and /or the design shown are the {property of ESP Associates, P.A. The
reproduction, alteration, copying or other use of this drawing without their written
consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action.
ESP Associates, P.A.
PLN CA l� O-
� Q
LICENSE NO.
C -0587
.
1112%;�SSOCIA -� °
°° '
2
tv �
ffFFJJ(( F
ll�
BAR SCALE 1 " =50'
ffffff /ff
A f �.y
-7 � 0 25 50 100
Off;•. 2
v? - t
Q: SEAL
r L -3635 Of
v r_
»!`7 /45
WETLANDS SURVEY OF TAX PARCELS# s!: = so'
5600 -94 -9671, 5600 -95 -4892, 5600 -95 -3690 ooa
LUCA'1 W 1N: NU G TOWNSHW, CfFY OF CUNCUHU, 9/14/15
CABARRUS COUNTY, NORTH CAMUNA Die a No.
.:LILNl: MATTAMY HOMES osmeoorrERNM
21278 AYR31£Y TOWN BLVD. SurrE 201 ree Na
CHARLOTTE. NORTH CAROLINA os052004M
PtoJee! No I Oaifnsf A 0'°" By Pro1Kt-101W. I Gu4wd W I 11

I
NOR
/ S`' / / NC 10 Rz rO
' - - --_ _ _30' SSRW 7
/,SS'$5 - SS— �SS-�._SS- --ASS- -ASS•- -----SS -- -SS \ fi
,/ Cr
SSA �SS% 1i ss\
2.
3`'U34 -U35 t136-U3.�`C1 .. L139 \
ss� 1J
�....� L141 _L142—=143 •..�... -�. s � .
v JURISDICTIONAL
SEASONAL RPW ��A6; • \ �` ~SS - '_
\, S
[> o
3068 SF
j 0.070 AC
O r'� sr9 ••\ � -
(0
2 -..
VICINITY MAP NO SCALE
�153-
r
W y
v
h � O
03
!t3
t
Q
fr,) �t
BAR SCALE 1 " =50'
• RO •.,W
�•`�� 2�N" �!�Ii A'•.,� ••ASS% 'Z 0 25 50 100
ESP Associates. P.A. ��':� _
LICENSE N0. SEAL WETLANDS SURVEY OF TAX PARCELS# s�
P.O. Bo, 7030 5600 -94 -9671, 5600 -95 -4892, 5800 -95 -3890 1 50•
Chadotte. RC 23241 C -0587 e 'r L -3635 Q naa
This drawing and/or the design shown are the property� of ESP Associates. P.A. The • '.� LUUA1L11 1N: NU 'L "1'UWN5HIY, C!'1`Y UN WNCUi{ll, 9/14/15
3475 taGemom Bhd reproduction, alteration, copying or other use of this drowin without their written i % Z
Fort hwt SC 29703 consent is prohibited and any Infringement will be subject to legal action. S, '•.• : '��� t9 '•.� �� ' �•, CABARRUS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Do ffi No.
704-553-4949 (1\0 �i Q• �� �i ••�� v �� �LIL141:
503-302-2440 . 3.4 9 (1\0 ESP Associates, P.A. �i� ,O ,rte .,� ,`�� MATTAMY HOMES tuoaso .WULAW
ESP%%x�c c_ utrscaan - , S• • T • 21278 AYRSLSY TOWN BLVD. St11TE 201 Job
r y" * O io %1,,,,, ,,`�`'''�� D. � CHARLOM, NORM ROUNA RDB AM
Ioi -7 �S �. I Br I� B I PIP�-M-. I «,.Z W 7 I 11

JO
1
;S�
SSRW NO
' SS
NC CRj ORlfl�rTfO
O T
83/2017
1411
L1$ I
VICINITY MAP NO SCALE
PID# 5600 -96 -5522
COLFIN AH —NORTH CAROLINA,
DB 11500 PG 277
t< p —•..� �� SS _ MB 53 PG 44
} l 2� • tt N t► a l 60 Np R� 1SON R1
i ! 6 �' G'Y V D
1C VE
} JURISDICTIONAL \C S3�• N , j Mg $3 pC 40F qY
SEASONAL RPW �i N tL166 m ��
12,162 SF �, L165
O 0.279 AC
o I
n
J
_ It tt Nei t I L177
PID 1 �
WAYNED 5600-96-6499
& S EGLINDE M. i
SS CD : PUTERBAUGH /
B 11374 PG
Ct75 �1�Llg 35 MB 53 PG 414
0
J
o
o
i W
o
k� PID# 5600 -96 -9644
LAUREL PARK PROPERTY
rf y OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INI
�t
DB 8530 PG 14
MB 53 PG ,44
c`
ESP Associates. P.A.
P.O. Boa 7030
Charlotte KC 28241
3475 Lakemmn Bhd
Fat Mill, SC 29709
704-5&1-4949 1, \O
ESP
803-802 -2440 W
— m .espassoc Mcs.com
This drawing and /or the design shown are the property of ESP Associctes, P.A. The
reproduction, alteration, copying or other use of this drawing without their written
consent is prohibited and any Infringement will be subject to legal action.
ESP Associates, P.A.
o`r CA R -'�i
We
LICENSE NO.
C -0587
i
A
7
SEAL
r L -3635 ia�
sug
�'••. T D 8 P�.•�.
r <D ice
LLC /
PID# 5600 -96 -7509
LAVARIA V. HALL
DB 11500 PG 277
35 MB 53 PG 44
BAR SCALE 1 " =50'
0 25 50 100
WETLANDS SURVEY OF TAX PARCELS#
5600 -94 -9671, 5600 -95 -4892, 5600 -95 -9890
LOL,AILU 1N: NO L '1UINNSHIY, Q11 Ur W14COkW,
CABARRUS COWM% NORTH CAROLINA
.:LIEN I: MATTAMY HOMES
21279 AYRSIEY TOWN BLVD. SLATE 201
CHARLUM, NORTH CAROLINA
ftjod Ha. I OJ I m� By I Pra:ctt —BMw. I G,.daa By
soak
1' = 50
Date
9/14/15
0 new Now
DSOS.BD WETLNID
Job N�
DSOS.800ADD
brIm
8 I 11

ESP Associates. P.A
P.O. Boa 7030
Charlotte. KC 25241
34751aken mt Bh-0
Fm i Mill. SC 29708
704 - 553 -4949 (,Cl
503- SD2.2440 LSC1
x x x•.espluot:411C5{Wn
This drawing and /or the design shown are the property of ESP Associates, P.A. The
reproduction, alteration, copying or other use of this drawing without their written
consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action.
ESP Associates, P.A.
13.84 (TIE)
CAR��i,L,,•.
LICENSE NO.
C— 0587
iA
*, '••...........: Q�T
V...." QSSOCIP,-\ •.
G
�f
JURISDICTIONAL
/
WETLANDS °H°
937 SF 1
0.022 AC
/
44
L189
N79'22'59 "E
P
o N
�
�p
�1
FIND #4
F
PROJECT BOUNDARY
L193
REBAR
�
I
�
I
�
l
I
4/
I
R 2 1
W
1 � �
I
�
ESP Associates. P.A
P.O. Boa 7030
Charlotte. KC 25241
34751aken mt Bh-0
Fm i Mill. SC 29708
704 - 553 -4949 (,Cl
503- SD2.2440 LSC1
x x x•.espluot:411C5{Wn
This drawing and /or the design shown are the property of ESP Associates, P.A. The
reproduction, alteration, copying or other use of this drawing without their written
consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action.
ESP Associates, P.A.
13.84 (TIE)
CAR��i,L,,•.
LICENSE NO.
C— 0587
iA
*, '••...........: Q�T
V...." QSSOCIP,-\ •.
G
�f
t�
f� t
P
o N
�
�p
�1
v O
!a
O
�U
G
22
O
i
R 2 1
W
1 � �
Z
i
EJ
:Q- SEAL
r L -3635 0
71�..SUR Az
•
,•,'���bNU�gH`�,,
VICINITY MAP NO SCALE
BAR SCALE 1 " =50'
0 25 50 100
WETLANDS SURVEY OF TAX PARCELS# -
5600 -94 -9671, 5600 -95 -4892, 5600 -95 -3690 1 50'
Dote
WLA1'1W 1N: NU L 1011 M11W, (Alf Of CUKUKU, 9/14/15
CABARRUS COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ov,ano Me.
ULN 1: TTAMY HOMES DsoeeoowERNO
21276 AYRSIEY TOWN BLVD. SUTfE 201 Joe he.
CHARLOM, NORTH CAROLINA osoeaoD ooD
WSH �ojeet Ho. I Dsslpad F)y I
Drawn BY I Protect =Wqr. I Ctwelwd BY —I
—

VICINITY MAP NO SCALE
Parcel Line Table I Parcel Line Table I Parcel Line Table Parcel Line Table I Parcel Line Table
Parcel Line Table
Line # Direction Length I Line # Direction Length I Line # Direction Length
L6 S 26'39'50" W 6.22 L26 S 44'53'25" W 15.67 I L46 S 33'53'42" W 3.18
L7 S 68'02'49" W 16.70 L27 S 10'15'56" W 9.37 L47 S 15'45'33" W 20.57
L8 S 35.57'34" W 16.49 L28 S 21'16'52" W 14.74 L48 S 1'04'02" E 6.81
L9 S 21'01'25" W 13.64 L29 S 15'12'49" W 16.90 L49 S 57'29'17" E 11.96
L10 S 37'18'53" W 20.48 I L30 S 35'13.51" W 42.00 L50 S 14'42'50" E 13.41
L11 S 14'19'57" W 25.67 I L31 S 3'47'47" E 21.13 L51 S 6'42'15" W 3.93
L12 S 28'50'25" W 84.15 I L32 S 17'19'13" W 32.07 L52 S 34'30'47" W 27.39
L13 S 20'50'11" W 31.77 I L33 S 36'43'54" W 18.49 I L53 S 33'42'47" W 18.95
L14 S 24'33'30" W 32.33 L34 S 37'57'11" W 12.38 I L54 S 30'22'38" W 39.30
L15 S 35'47.27" W 24.88 L35 S 79'04'03" W 9.26 I L55 S 61'54'02" W 4.69
L16 S 30'05'43" W 30.35 L36 S 57'36'15" W 2.39 L56 S 40'09'28" W 28.63
L17 S 34'03'40" W 31.39 L37 S 8.58'09" W 3.02 L57 S 3253'09" W 28.96
L18 S 26'52'27" W 22.63 L38 S 38'43'10" E 6.60 L58 S 46'51'40" W 21.81
L19 S 33'11'27" W 74.97 I L39 S 8'34'16" W 30.95 L59 S 45'44'57" W 39.81
L20 S 24'42'15" W 30.00 L40 S 29'46'51" E 6.41 L60 S 33'36'11" W 36.43
L21 S 28'11'53" W 23.21 L41 S 14'11'21" W 12.17 L61 S 34'48'04" W 49.19
L22 S 33'43'47" W 17.07 L42 S 72'07'27" W 8.46 I L62 S 35'17'07" W 37.33
L23 S 33'07'20" W 10.72 L43 S 46'38'19" W 13.50 I L63 S 29'01'01" W 22.40
L24 S 2330'29" W 25.22 I L44 N 82'58'32" W 6.99 L64 S 49'45'09" W 29.79
L25 S 35'14'54" W 14.91 I L45 S 52'08'47" W 5.31 L65 S 36'36'44" W 38.94
ESP Associates. P.A.
P.O. Bar 7030
chartottc, a 2S24!
This drawing and /or the design shown are the property of ESP Associates, P.A. The
3a75t�l.emontBl.d. reproduction, alteration, copying or other use of this drawing without their written
tort) ill. SC 29708 consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action.
704.583 -4949 (SC)
803 -802- 2440150) ESP Associates, P.A.
ESP.--.Cspas wtates.t
Line # Direction Length ( Line # Direction Length I Line # Direction Length
L66 S 34'26.04" W 54.19 ( L86 S 4'47'01" W 36.34 L106 N 6'41'57" W 35.90
L67 S 40'29'46" W 47.01 ( L87 S 41'22.46" W 35.63 L107 N 20. 53'14" W 20.33
L68 S 36.08.36" W 34.21 I L88 S 49'06'49" W 38.09 L108 N 4'03'05" E 35.77
L69 S 35'26'46" W 38.71 I L89 S 69'21'02" W 23.86 I L109 N 7'39'36" E 14.58
L70 S 38'16.24" W 41.56 I L90 S 44'07'15" W 36.52 I L110 N 23'40'56" W 25.06
L71 S 41'35'22" W 49.29 I L91 S 47'24'01" W 32.37 I 1-111 N 1'15'36" W 35.63
L72 S 36'56'02" W 35.78 I L92 S 63'14'42" W 9.64 L112 N 1'08'58" E 12.39
L73 S 24'03'28" W 27.08 I I L93 S 59'49'41" W 8.58 L113 N 24'47'20" W 44.30
L74 S 42'19'41" W 44.66 I L94 S 59'38'51" W 16.76 I L114 N 52.57'49" W 33.44
L75 S 46'56'40" W 34.17 ( I L95 S 25. 59'12" W 31.47 L115 N 37'15'25" W 15.15
L76 S 40.05'44" W 36.24 I I L96 S 45.11'50" W 22.09 L116 N 29'45.36" W 13.07
L77 S 42'34'21" W 38.97 I I L97 S 52'50'40" W 38.40 L117 N 37. 39'48" W 15.57
L78 S 36'57'05" W 16.95 I L98 S 55'11'28" W 15.41 L118 N 23'23'44" W 8.06
L79 S 41'34'05" W 7.94 I L99 N 29'01'00" W 28.53 L119 N 65'17'25" W 10.73
L80 S 52'27'50" W 36.40 L100 N 18'36'59" W 28.89 L120 N 42'32'37" W 21.46
L81 S 13'38'02" W 41.13 L101 N 16"18'32" W 27.61 L721 N 33'38'23" W 29.77
L82 S 32'20'55" W 42.18 L702 N 13'02'44" W 9.56 L122 N 58'29'49" W 12.54
L83 S 60'50'28" W 10.06 I L103 N 25'30'34" W 21.62 L123 N 34'17'38" W 15.28
L84 S 42'23'12" W 88.70 I L104 N 18'00'24" W 37.31 L124 N 014'29" W 8.55
L85 S 17'21'20" W 27.75 I L105 N 25'59'39" W 30.07 L125 N 20'41'01" W 15.58
BAR SCALE 1 " =50'
eeeeeNNgeeeee a eeeNeeNUUegej
.r0 e �N CARo ••''•. C•• ,• ,
O: ti O -SS /p . 2 ', 0 25 50 100
? = SEAL �': WETLANDS SURVEY OF TAX PARCELS #_
LICENSE N0. :
C -0587 5600 -94 -9671, 5600 -95 -4892, 5600 -95 -9890 1 = ��
:r L- 36350; D,,.
O '•� LUCAI D IN• NU 2 °1UWN5'H1Y, Cl'11 UN' CUNCUHU, 9/14/15
z� �''•. ` s• 61 ' ?p �� <c, , CABARRITS COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA � w.
,
bdATTA�iY TOMES tna5.eM Me,t,v,D
'' �GS�e` ,'••is/ 8 P� ee�e 21278 AYRSIKY TOWN BLVD. SUITE 201 job row
��
,� •4 ee Ne gv b ue� j�pNe ee a CHA10M. NORTH CAROLINA osos ao.000
eeeea Nee e
I WSH I ROB I 'I of
BIG ey P-J-I-+hW. 10 11

ESP Associates. P.A.
P.O. Bm 7030
aurloltc. NC 23241
3475 Ukcmont Bhd
fort Shll. SC 29708
F%. F 704 - 553 -4949 ma
803.80-2440W
uHe.apassoctala.cwn
Line #
L213
L214
L215
L216
L217
L218
L219
L220
L221
L222
L223
L224
L225
Name
Parcel Line Table
Acres
I
Parcel Line Table
Acres
Length
Parcel Line Table
JUSRISDICTIONAL SEASONAL RPW A
0.327
Parcel Line Table
15.1'
Line #
0.215
Direction
Length
Line #
0.070
Direction
Length
Line #
Direction
Length
Line #
Direction
Length
L126
N
41'33'02" W
21.02
L146
N
35'34'33" E
5.76
L166
N 1'05'57" W
7.15
L187
S 27'23'01" E
24.61
L127
N
23'52'49" W
20.33
L147
N
17'41'12" E
12.39
L167
N 44.50.25" E
10.19
L194
S 4934'49" E
8.52
L128
N
36'43'17" W
21.99.
L148
N
7'24.03" E
44.39
L168
N 60'26'42" E
7.14
L195
S 12'35'32" W
82.50
L129
N
42'06'09" W
19.56
L149
N
30'40'30" E
25.16
L169
N 55'56'19" E
7.55
L196
S 12'01'49" W
53.89
L130
N
8'34.12" W
22.72
L150
N
20'53'01" E
11.64
L170
N 31'05'31" E
17.82
L197
S 28'44'51" W
94.56
L131
N
43'38'12" W
23.42
I L151
N
11'29'41" E
14.43
L171
N 67'31'56" E
15.09
L198
S 36'45'32" W
76.34
L132
N
7'16'16" W
25.23
L152
N
1'20'50" E
22.66
L172
N 70'51'42" E
9.73
L199
S 40'39'49" W
181.57
L133
N
4'50'05" E
22.40
L153
N
4.02'14" W
18.04
L173
N 32'53'57" E
11.68
L200
S 32'25'38" W
82.42
L134
N
6'10'06" W
34.03
L154
N
0'07'06" E
14.51
L174
N 43'09'46" E
6.16
L201
S 4'19'23" E
35.62
L135
N
26'16'45" W
14.03
L155
N
11'50'18" W
11.41
L175
N 0'01'29" E
11.53
L202
S 57'11'47" W
42.63
L136
N
14'54'57" W
18.00
L156
N
46'33'45" E
14.90.
L176
N 37'16'21" W
11.47
L203
N 5'25'49" E
35.47
L137
N
24'55'38" W
6.06
I L157
N
3'37'18" W
27.61
L177
N 14'27'45" W
7.50
L204
N 27'12'22" E
23.38
L138
N
4'33'36" E
33.76
I L158
N
17'37'25" W
35.51
L178
N 23'48'47" E
16.91
L205
N 26'24'20" E
39.03
L139
N
4'49'55" W
53.32
L159
N
6'48'58" W
26.46
L179
N 65'31'29" E
13.70
L206
N 32'06'26" E
139.82
L740
N
2.23'43" E
28.85
L160
N
38'39'45" W
33.91
L180
N 0'42'42" E
30.91
L207
N 28'12'11" E
179.41
L141
N
14'57'19" W
22.66
L161
N
1'28'57" W
32.04
L181
N 30'36'19" E
12.67
L208
N 29'05'09" E
72.63
L142
N
6'46'45" W
20.32
I L162
N
14'49'29" E
29.68
L183
S 57'13'27" E
28.70
L209
N 29'57'18" E
69.85
L143
N
24.23'01" W
25.15
I L163
N
2'11'42" E
21.42
L184
S 42'40'57" E
11.77
L210
N 40'32'55" E
75.16
L144
N
2'06'04" W
26.47
I L164
N
40'03'17" E
22.89
L185
S 7'08'35" W
18.25
L211
S 32'09'18" E
33.81
L145
N
19'24'06" E
24.14
L165
N
1'38.21" W
14.23
L186
S 14'19'44" E
24.59
L212
S 34'59'40" E
40.70
ESP Associates. P.A.
P.O. Bm 7030
aurloltc. NC 23241
3475 Ukcmont Bhd
fort Shll. SC 29708
F%. F 704 - 553 -4949 ma
803.80-2440W
uHe.apassoctala.cwn
Line #
L213
L214
L215
L216
L217
L218
L219
L220
L221
L222
L223
L224
L225
Name
Square Feet
Acres
Average
Name
Acres
Length
Width
JUSRISDICTIONAL SEASONAL RPW A
0.327
941
15.1'
JUSRISDICTIONAL SEASONAL RPW 8
0.215
1475
6.3'
JUSRISDICTIONAL SEASONAL RPW C
0.070
108
20.6'
JURISDICTIONAL SEASONAL RPW D
0.070
474
6.4'
JURISDICTIONAL SEASONAL RPW E
0.279
1285
9.4'
TOTAL JURISDCITIONAL STREAMS
0.961
4,283'
11.5'
ESP Associates. P.A.
P.O. Bm 7030
aurloltc. NC 23241
3475 Ukcmont Bhd
fort Shll. SC 29708
F%. F 704 - 553 -4949 ma
803.80-2440W
uHe.apassoctala.cwn
Line #
L213
L214
L215
L216
L217
L218
L219
L220
L221
L222
L223
L224
L225
Name
Square Feet
Acres
WETLANDS "F"
24,610
0.565
WETLANDS "G"
2,773
0.059
WETLANDS "H"
931
0.022
TOTAL JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
28,356
0.646
This drawing and /or the design shown are the property of ESP Associates, P.A. The
reproduction, alteration, copying or other use of this drawing without their written
consent is prohibited and any infringement will be subject to legal action.
ESP Associates, P.A.
LICENSE NO.
C-0587
,IAA.
.......... Q%
�°°°SSOCIP'1 a0•
2
Parcel Line Table
Direction
Length
S 36'01'07" E
22.31
S 7'35'43" E
21.00
S 41'38'20" E
43.42
S 35'39'35" E
22.17
S 13'37'14" E
21.32
N 35'39'35" W
41.94
N 50'41'31" W
47.20
N 7'35'43" W
26.27
N 45'12'39" W
21.04
N 35'59'02" W
39.90
N 26'23'53" W
21.63
N 28'26'52" E
17.64
S 69.05'46" W
48.37
0
v
2 SEAL
L -3635
��
000"ZOOOL, 4141
rC, f-2 15;
VICINITY MAP NO SCALE
BAR SCALE 1 " =50'
0 25 50 100
WETLANDS SURVEY OF TAX PARCELS# - "
5600 -94 -9671, 5600 -95 -4892, 5600 -95 -3690 t ° 50'
Date
LUCA'IED 1N: NU L '10NN5HIY, 0111 UN' CUNCUHU, 9/14/15
CABARRUS COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA w
HOMES osos.eoowenxro
21276 AYRSLEY TOWN BLVD. SUPPB 201 in r+o.
CHARLOTTE. NORTH CAROLINA OS05AODAW

It
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Pat McCrory Division of Mitigation Services Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
October 8, 2015
Bob Wiggins
Mattamy Homes
2127 Ayrsley Town Blvd. Suite 201
Charlotte, NC 28273 Expiration of Acceptance: April 8, 2016
Project: Weddington Walk County: Cabarrus
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to accept payment for
compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table below. Please note that this
decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies
as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the
DMS will be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations
associated with the proposed activity including G. S. § 143- 214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit /401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on
the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu
fee to be paid by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at http: / /portal.ncdenr.org /web /eep.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are
summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by
permitting agencies and may exceed the impact amounts shown below.
CU Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) I Buffer I Buffer II
River Basin Location (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non - Riparian Coastal Marsh I
Impact Yadkin 03040105 0 0 230 0' 0 1 0 I 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed
in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need additional information,
please contact Kelly Williams at (919) 707 -8915,
Sincerely,
Jame . Stanfill
Asset anagement Supervisor
cc: William Elliott, USAGE- Asheville
Gregg Antemann/Kelly Thames, agent
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1652
Phone: 919 - 707 -89761 Internet: hfp: /Iportal,ncdenr.org /web /eep
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer —Made in part from recycled paper