840012_Permit Renewal Application 2019_20190410

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Animal Waste Management Systems
Request for Certification of Coverage
Facility Currently covered by an Expiring Sate Non-Discharge General Permit
On September 30, 2019, the North Carolina State Non-Discharge General Permits for Animal Waste Management Systems will
expire. As required by these permits, facilities that have been issued Certificates of Coverage to operate under these State
Non-Discharge General Permits must apply for renewal at least 180 days prior to their expiration date. Therefore, all applications
must be received by the Division of Water Resources by no later than April 3,2019.
Please do not leave any question unanswered. Please verify all information and make any necessary corrections below.
Application must be signed and dated by the Permittee.
1. Farm Number: 84-0012 Certificate Of Coverage Number: AWC840012
2. Facility Name: Smith Dairy
3. Landowner's Name(same as on the Waste Management Plan): Shell. J Smith
4, Landowner's Mailing Address: 42757 Loor Rd
City: Norwood State: NC
Zip: 28128
Telephone Number: 704-474-4971 Ext. E-mail:
5. Facility's Physical Address: 42757 Loor,Rd
City: Norwood State: NC
Zip: 28128
6. County where Facility is located: Stan "� e
7. Farm Manager's Name(if different from Landowner): �5-A V,{ c t V d?t t
8. Farm Manager's telephone number(include area code): rl Q q- °d
9. Integrator's Name(if there is not an Integrator write"None"):
10. Operator Name(OIC): %����q / Phone No.: OIC#: l fed
11. Lessee's Name(if there is not a Lessee,write'None"):
12. Indicate animal operation type and n fiber:_ fi Q 0
Current Permit: Operations Type Allowable Count
Cattle-Milk Cow 418
Operation Types:
Swine Cattle Dry Poultry Other Types
Wean to Finish Dairy Calf Non Laying Chickens Horses-Horses
Wean to Feeder Dairy Heifer Laying Chickens Horses-Other
Farrow to Finish Milk Cow Pullets Sheep-Sheep
Feeder to Finish Dry Cow Turkeys Sheep-Other
Farrow to Wean Beef Stocker Calf Turkey Pullet
Farrow to Feeder Beef Feeder
Boar/Stud Beef Broad Cow Wet Poultr.
Gilts Other Non Laying Pullet
Other Layers

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
APR 0 2 2019"
Animal Waste Management Systems
Request for Certification of Coverage 00"!7:: t
Facility Currently covered by an Expiring Sate Non-Discharge General
On September 30, 2019, the North Carolina State Non-Discharge General Permits for Animal Waste Management Systems will
expire. As required by these permits, facilities that have been issued Certificates of Coverage to operate under these State
Non-Discharge General Permits must apply for renewal at least 180 days prior to their expiration date. Therefore, all applications
must be received by the Division of Water Resources by no later than April 3,2019.
Please do not leave any question unanswered. Please verify all information and make any necessary corrections below.
Application must be signed and dated by the Permittee.
1. Farm Number: 84-0012 Certificate Of Coverage Number: AWC840012
2. Facility Name: Smith Dairy
3. Landowner's Name(same as on the Waste Management Plan): Shelly J Smith
4. Landowner's Mailing Address: 42757 Loon_Rd
City: Norwood State: NC Zip: 28128
Telephone Number: 704-474-4971 Ext. E-mail:
5. Facility's Physical Address: 42757 Loon Rd
City: Norwood State: NC Zip: 28128
6. County where Facility is located: Stanly
7. Farm Manager's Name(if different from Landowner): V q t'
8. Farm Manager's telephone number(include area code): / d q r lq q ` 'f� V
9. Integrator's Name(if there is notan Integrator write"None"): (,
10. Operator Name(OIC): �dl/// !,-9/ Phone No.: �� 1 ~(/ / OIC#: t Sod
11. Lessee's Name(if there is not a Lessee,write"None"):
12. Indicate animal operation type and n 3ber
Current Permit: Operations Type { Allowable Count
Cattle-Milk Cow 418
Operation Types:
Swine Cattle Dry Poultry Other T.pes
Wean to Finish Dairy Calf Non Laying Chickens Horses-Horses
Wean to Feeder Dairy Heifer Laying Chickens Horses-Other
Farrow to Finish Milk Cow Pullets Sheep-Sheep
Feeder to Finish Dry Cow Turkeys Sheep-Other
Farrow to Wean Beef Stocker Calf Turkey Pullet
Farrow to Feeder Beef Feeder
Boar/Stud Beef Broad Cow Wet Poultc-%
Gilts Other Non Laying Pullet
Other Layers

13. Waste Treatment and Storage Lagoons (Verify the following information is accurate and complete. Make all necessary
corrections and provide missing data.)
Design
Estimated Liner Type Estimated Freeboard
Structure Date (Clay,Synthetic, Capacity Surface Area "Redline"
Name Built Unknown) (Cubic Feet) (Square Feet) (Inches)
WASTE POND 1 r.• , 92, n a�g 0 18.00
Mail one (1) copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with this completed and signed application
as required by NC General Statutes 143-215.1OC(d)to the address below.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
1. The most recent Waste Utilization Plan(WUP),signed b, the owner and a certified technical specialist.containing: �1
a. The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields(e.g.irrigation,injection,etc.) _ qnd 4p p(9, —S0r1 aw
b. A map of every field used for land application(for example:irrigation map)
c. The soil series present on every land application field
d. The crops grown on every land application field
c. The Realistic Yield Expectation(RYE)for every crop shown in the WUP
£ The maximum PAN to be applied to every land application field
g. The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
h. The required NRCS Standard specifications
2. A site map/schematic
3. Emergency Action Plan
4. Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
5. Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
6. Mortality Control Checklist with selected method noted-Use the enclosed updated Mortality Control Checklist
7. Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.) Please be sure the above table is accurate and
complete. Also provide any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to
your facility.
8. Operation and Maintenance Plan
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal.
(e.g.composting,digesters,waste transfers,etc.)
As a second option to mailing paper copies of the application package, you can scan and email one signed copy of the
application and all the CAWMP items above to: [e-mail]

I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that,
if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not
included,this application package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false statement,
representation, or certification in any application may be subject to civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation. (18 U.S.C.
Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both for
a similar offense.)
Printed Name of Signing Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all landowners should sign. If Landowner is a
corporation,signature should be b(y,a principal executive officer of the corporation):
Name: L!/ �M I Title: ()1444
Signature: Date: 3 g
Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number:[phone]
E-mail:2019PermitRenewal@ncden r.gov
FORM: RENEWAL-STATE GENERAL 02/2019

I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that,
if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not
included,this application package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6.A and 143-215.613, .any person!-.who. knowingly, makes any false statement,
representation, or certification in any application may be subject, to civil penalties,„up.;to_:$25;000 per violation. (18 U.S.C.
Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both for
a similar offense.)
Printed Name of Signing Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all landowners :should sign. If Landowner is a
corporation,signature should be by a principal executive officer of the corporation):
Name: �[ J /�" Title: 014AZ4
Signature: LA-1 _ Date:
Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
Name: _ Title:
Signature: Date:
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO;THE FOLLOWIN,G,ADDRESS:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636 -
Telephone number:[phone]
E-mail:[e-mail]
FORM: RENEWAL-STATE GENERAL 02/2019

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S.REGAN `+ Z��g
Secretary APR 0 2
LINDA CULPEPPER NORTR CAROL A
Director 8nvironmentatQual ty
February 26,2019'
Shelly J Smith
Smith Dairy
42757 Loop Rd
Norwood,NC 28128
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring State General Permit
Dear Permittee:
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation State Non-Discharge General Permits,
which expire on September 30, 2019. Copies of the new animal waste operation State Non-Discharge General Permits are available
at hn s://d c.nc. ov/about/divisions/wat r-resources/water .ualitk-re ional-o erations/afo or by writing or calling:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number:[phone]
In order to assure our continued cover a under the State Non-Discharge General Permits. you mu t submit an application for
ermit covera a to the Division. Enclosed you will find a "Request for Certificate of Coverage Facility Currenth Covered by an
Expiring State Non-Disch a General Permit." The application
form must be com leted. si ned -A returned b April 3, 20�
Please note that you m t include one 11 cop,. of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAW ) with the
com leted an signed application form. A list of items included in the CAMP can be found on page 2 of the renewal
ay1+lication form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to$25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the State Non-Discharge General Permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feel
free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Branch staff at 919-707-9100.
Sincerely,
Jon Risgaard,Section Chief
Animal Feeding Operations and Groundwater Section
Enclosures
cc(w/o enclosures): Mooresville Regional Office,Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Stanly County Soil and Water Conservation District
AFOG Section Central Files-AWC840012
Na:KL Csro_'ra Department of Eava•artment& QW911y I 0!VWOM of W41 ter Resources
L� 512 N.Salsbury St.11835 Ma"SerVoe Center I Re'=_'gh;North Card?2a 276Se-1S35
919.707 9DDO

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
06-11-2012
This plan has been prepared for: This plan has been developed by:
Shelly Smith Dairy Gerald McSwain
Shelly JSmith Stanly Soil& Water Conservation District
42 75 7 Loop Rd. 26032-C Newt Rd
Norwood, NC 28128 Albemarle, NC 28001
704-244-6321 704-982-6811 Ext3
.Pr,( (Ae-
Developer Signature
A.ype of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I(we)understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
ture(owner) Date
Signature(manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
R
Plan Approved By: 2de,� g
Technical Specialist Signature Date
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-11-2012 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
Ul Storage Pond waste generated 877,800 gals/year by a 418 animal Dairy(Milk Cow)
Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities
of approximately 120 days..
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast 5386
Incorporated 7344
Injected 8324
Irrigated 4896
Max. Avail. Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Volume Volume Surplus/
PAN(lbs) * Applied Obs) Deficit(lbs) Applied(Gallons) Deficit(Gallons)
Year 1 5,386 43447 -38,061 6,149,076 -5,271,276
Year 2 57386 46032 -40,646 7,299,552 -6,421,752
Year 3 5,386 28190 -22,804 4,664,708 3,786,908
Year 4 5,386 35261 -29,875 4,762,994 -3,885,194
S1 Dairy,(Milk Cow) Solid waste generated 4,250.00 tons/year by a 250 animal Dairy
(Milk Cow) Solid operation. _
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast 18275
Incorporated 24225
Injected N/A
Irrigated N/A
Max. Avail. Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Quantity Surplus/Deficit
PAN(lbs) * Applied (lbs) Deficit(lbs) Applied(Tons) (Tons)
Year 1 18,275 42112 -23,837 8,702.19 -4,452.19
Year 2 18,275 46712 -28,437 9,697.52 -5,447.52
Year 3 18,275 20203 -1,928 4,847.12 597.12
Year 4 18,275 40588 -22,313 8,651.02 -4,401.02
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG-439-42
entitled"Soil Facts: Use of On-Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan"for
guidance on using on-farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
Note: In source ID,S means standard source,U means user defined source.
*Max.Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s)identified in the plan for this source.
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-11-2012 Source Page 1 of 1

Narrative
This operation usually milks around2500 head but it is certified for 418 head. The'cows are kept on the
concrete about 8 hours a day the balance of the time they are to be kept in the pack bam.
The waste from the storage pond will be applied by honey wagon.The waste from the pack barn will be
applied by a dry spreader.Dead animals will be buried or transported to a rendering facility in South
Carolina.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-11-2012 Narrative Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield
imates are also provided for each crop,as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index(LI)and the
Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool(PLAT)Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High,any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the
harvested plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT
Rating should receive no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be
recommended in accordance with North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205
applied to each crop is shown in the following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Total Useable Plat P205
Removal Applied
Tract Field Acres Acres Rating Ll Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (lbs/acre) (Ibs/acre)
10043 1 11.20 11.00 Low 15.0 Tatum Cotton 6211bs. 18 N/A
Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 28 N/A
Corn,Grain 110 bu. 48 N/A
10044 1-2 22.10 22.00 Low 15.0 Tatum Cotton 641lbs. 19 N/A
Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu 29 N/A
Corn,Grain 114 bu. 50 N/A
10083 1-2 14.70 14.70 Low 15.0 Badin Corn,Grain 110 bu. 48 N/A
Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 28 N/A
Fescue Hay 3.7 Tons 58 N/A
10084 5-11 11.08 11.00 Low 15.0 Badin Corn,Grain 110 bu. 48 N/A
Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 28 N/A
10327 All 16.48 16.001 Medium 15.0 Tatum Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 7 N/A
11344 1-8 18.56 18.00 Low 10.0 Goldston Fescue Hay 3.3 Tons 52 N/A
2900 1 3.08 3.00 Low 15.0 Badin Cotton 665lbs. 19 N/A
Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 29 N/A
Corn,Grain 114 bu. 50 N/A
3086 2,3 18.49 18.00 Low 15.0 Badin Corn,Grain 114 bu. 50 N/A
Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 29 N/A
Cotton 665lbs. 19 N/A
3097 1 12.68 12.00 Low 10.0 Goldston Corn,Grain 76 bu.1 33 N/A
Wheat,Grain 38 bu. 19 1 N/A
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/11/2012
PCs Page 1 of 5
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.

e_E.i s�Fv.,�d13�+:+I�le1eYY 1:
APR ® 2 ZOIT
-planned Crops Summary
Total Useable Plat P205
Tract Field Acres Aces RatingEt Applied
LI Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (lbs/acre/acre) (Ibs/acre)
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 24 bu. 19 N/A
Cotton 4511bs. 13 N/A
3097 2-3 11.71 11.00 Low 15.0 Badin Corn,Grain 114 bu. 50 N/A
Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 29 N/A
Cotton 6651bs. 19 N/A
.3117 1-3 24.65 23.00 Low 10.0 Badin Corn,Grain 114 bu. 50 N/A
Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 29 N/A
Cotton 6651bs. 19 N/A
3228 1,2 12.73 12.00 Low 10.0 Goldston Cotton 4371bs. 13 N/A
Wheat,Grain 37 bu. 19 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 23 bu. 18 N/A
Corn,Grain 74 bu. 33 N/A
3634 1 7.80 7.80 Low 15.0 Badin Corn,Grain 110 bu. 48 N/A
Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 28 N/A
3668 1,2,3 28.90 28.90 Low 15.0 Badin Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 29 N/A
Corn,Silage 20.9 Tons 71 N/A
3670 1-10 66.40 66.40 Low 15.0 Tatum Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 29 N/A
Corn,Silage 20.9 Tons 71 N/A
3670 1 t-15 15.50 15.501 Low 15.0 Congaree Wheat,Grain 49 bu. 25 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 45 bu. 36 N/A
Corn,Silage 27.4 Tons 93 N/A
3673 1-4 20.80 20.80 Low 15.0 Badin Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 28 N/A
Corn,Silage 20.2 Tons 69 N/A
3675 1-6 14.90 14.901 Low 15.0 Badin Corn,Grain 110 bu. 48 N/A
Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 28 N/A
3675 7 3.50 3.50 Low 15.0 Congaree Corn,Grain 147 bu. 65 N/A
Wheat,Grain 49 bu. 25 N/A'
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 45 bu. 36 N/A
3680 1,2,4,5,6, 42.671 42.00 Low 15.0 Badin Corn,Grain 114 bu. 50 N/A
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/11/2012
PCS Page 2 of 5
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.

Manned Crops Summary
Total Useable Plat P2O5
Tract Field Acres Acres Rating LI Soil Series CropSequence RYE Removal Applied
4 (lbs/acre) (lbs/acre)
Wheat,Grain 152 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 29 N/A
Fescue Hay 3.8 Tolls60 N/A
3682 1 6.OQ 6.00 Low 15.0 Badin Corn,Grain 110 bu. 48 N/A
Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 28 N/A
3683 1-3 31.78 31.00 Low 15.0 Tatum Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 29 N/A
Corn,Silage 20.9 Tons71 N/A
3684 1-2 27.50 27.50 Low 15.0 Badin Corn,Grain 110 bu. 48 N/A
Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 28 N/A
3686 1,2 8.22 8.00 Low 15.0 Badin Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 29 N/A
Corn,Silage 20.9 Tons 71 N/A
3840 1 16.65 16.60 Low 15.0 Georgeville Cotton 665lbs. 19 N/A
Wheat,Grain 57 bu. 29 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 40 bu_ 32 N/A
Corn,Grain 119 bu. 52 N/A
3846 1-9 69.64 65.00 Low 10.0 Badin Corn,Grain 110 bu. 48 N/A
Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 28 N/A
Cotton 6441bs. 19 N/A
3848 12 9.41 9.00 Low 15.0 Tames Cotton 6411bs. 19 N/A
Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 29 N/A
Corn,Grain 114 bu. 50 N/A
3855 7,9 18.61 18.00 Low 15.0 Tames Cotton 6411bs. 19 N/A
Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 29 N/A
Corn,Grain 114 bu. 50 N/A
3889 1,2 18.22 18.00 Low 10.0 Goldston Cotton 4371bs. 13 N/A
Wheat,Grain 37 bu. 19 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 23 bu. 18 N/A
Corn,Grain 74 bu. 33 N/A
3897 1,2 16.88 16.00 Low 15.0 Tan-us Cotton 641lbs. 19 N/A
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/11/2012
PCS Page 3 of 5
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.

Manned Crops Summary
Total Useable Plat P2O5
Tract Field Acres Acres Rating Removal Applied
g LI Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (lbs/acre) (lbs/acre)
Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 29 N/A
Com,Grain 114 bu. 50 N/A
3899 1,2 13.11 13.00 Low 15.0 Badin Com,Grain 110 bu. 48 N/A
Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 28 N/A
Cotton 6441bs. 19 N/A
3929 1 17.17 17.00 Low 15.0 Tarrus Cotton 641lbs. 19 N/A
Wheat,Grain 52 ba 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 29 N/A
Com,Grain 114 bu. 50 N/A
8900 All 11.18 11.00 Low 10.0 Goldston Cotton 437lbs. 13 N/A
Wheat,Grain 37 bu. 19 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 23 bu. 18 N/A
Com,Grain 74 bu.1 33 N/A
8945 1 24.00 24.00 Low 15.0 Tatum Cotton 6211bs. 18 N/A
Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 28 N/A
Com,Grain 110 bu. 48 N/A
9288 1,2 9.37 9.00 Low 15.0 Badin Com,Grain 114 bu. 50 N/A
Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 26 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 29 N/A
Cotton 6651bs. 19 N/A
9310 3,5,23 11.41 10.00 Low 15.0 Georgeville Cotton 665 tbs. 19 N/A
Wheat,Grain 57 bu. 29 N/A
Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 40 bu. 32 N/A
Corn,Grain 119 bu 52 N/A
PLAN TOTALS: 687.08 670.60
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/11/2012
PCs Page 4 of 5
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.

LI Potential Leaching Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble None
<2 nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>=2& Moderate potential to contribute to Nutrient Management(590)should be planned.
<=10 soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
i]igh potential to contribute to soluble Nutrient Management(590)should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
11 utrient leaching below the root zone. the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10 considered. Examples are Cover Crops(340)to scavenge nutrients,Sod-Based Rotations
(328),Long-Tenn No-Till(778),and edge-of-field practices such as Filter Strips(393)and
Riparian Forest Buffers(391).
PLAT Index Rating P Management Recommendation 1
0-25 Low No adjustment needed;N based application
25-50 Medium No adjustment needed;N based application
51 - 100 High Application limited to crop P removal
> 100 Very High Starter P application only
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 6/11/2012
PCS Page 5 of 5
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization pLui°for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of"acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown,their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products,commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
-PA Fen. (Ibs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field):^"`
(Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID I Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
10043 1 SI Tatum 11.20 11.00 Cotton 621 Ibs, 3/15-7/31 45 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 102.32
10043 1 S1 Tatum 11.20 11.00 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/3C 98 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.301 0.00 102.32
10044 1-2 S1 Tatum 22.10 22.00 Cotton 641 lbs. 3/15-7/31 47 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 204.65
10044 1-2 sl Tatum 22.10 22.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 8/15-11/30 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 204.65
10083 1-2 U1 Badin 14.70 14.70 Corn,Grain 110 bu. 2/15-6/30 119 0 20 Broad. 99 16.14 0.00 237.19 0.00
10083 1-2 U1 Badin 14.70 14.70 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/30 98 0 U Broad. 98 15.97 0.00 234.80 0.00
10084 5-11 U1 Badin 11.08 11.00 Corn,Grain 110 bu. 2/15-6/30 119 0 0 Broad, 119 19.40 0.00 166.80 0.00
10084 5-11 Ul Badin 11.08 11.00 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 18/15-1 16 98 0 0 Broad. 98 15.97 0.00 137.36 0.00
10327 All UI Tatum 16,48 16.00 Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 133 0 0 Broad. 93 15.16 0.00 216.75
10327 All S1 Tatum 16.48 16.00 Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 133 0 0 1 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 133.02
11344 1-8 SI Goldston 18.56 18.00 Fescue Hay 3.3 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 167.44
2900 1 S1 Badin 3.08 3.00 Cotton 665 lbs. 3/15-7/31 49 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 27.91
2900 1 S1 Badin 3.08 3.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/30 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 27.91
3086 2,3 SI Badin 18.49 18.00 Corn,Grain 114 bu. 2/15-6130 123 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 167.44
3086 2,3 S1 Badin 18.49 18.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 8/15-1 l/30 100 0 0 Broad. 80 0.00 9.30 0.00 167.44
3097 1 S1 Goldston 12.68 12.00 Corn,Grain 76 bu. 2/15-6/30 95 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 111.63
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:6/11/2012 WUT Page 1 of 16

Waste Utilil -in Table Lear 1 e
Nitrogen Conm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (Ibs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic, 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres I Acres I Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
3097 1 SI Goldston 12.68 12.00 Wheat,Grain 38 bu. *8/15-11/30 91 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 111.63
3097 2-3 SI Badin 11.71 11.00 Corn,Grain 114 bu. 2/15-6/30 123 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 102.32
3097 2-3 SI Badin 11.71 U.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/3i 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 102.32
3117 1-3 St Badin 24.65 23.00 Corn,Grain 114 bu. 2/15-6/30 123 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 213.�`
3117 l'-3 SI Badin 24.65 23.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 8/15-I1/30 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 213.93
3228 1,2 S1 Goldston 12.73 12.00 Cotton 437 lbs. 3/15-7/31 52 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 111.63
3228 1,2 S1 Goldston 12.73 12.00 Wheat,Grain 37 bu. *8/15-11/3c 89 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 111.63
3634 1 Ul Badin 7.80 7.80 Corn,Grain 110 bu. 2/15-6/30 119 0 0 Broad. 119 19.40 0.00 151.28 0.00
3634 1 U1 Badin 7.801 7.80 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/31 98 0 0 Broad. 98 15.97 0.00 124.59 0.00
3668 1,2,3 U1 Badin 28.90 28.90 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 08/15-11/30 100 0 0 Broad. 60 9.78 0.00 282.61 0.00
3668 1,2,3 St Badin 28.90 28.90 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. "8/15-11/3(1 100 0 0 Broad, 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 268.83
3668 1,2,3 UI Badin 28.90 28.90 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 Broad, 99 16.14 0.001 466.31 0.00
3668 1,2,3 S1 Badin 28.90 28.90 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 268.83
3670 1-10 Ul Tatum 66.40 66.40 Wheat,Grain. 52 bu. 8/15-11/3 100 0 0 Broad. 60 9.78 0.00 649.33 0.00.
3670 1-10 SI Tatum 66.40 66.40 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 8/15-11/31 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 617.6t,
3670 1-10 N/A Tatum 66.40 66.40 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 N/A 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3670 1 I-15 UI Congaree 15.50 15.50 Wheat,Grain 49 bu, *8/15-11/30 98 0 0 Broad. 98 15.97 0.00 247.57 0.00
3670 11-15 N/A Congaree 15.50 15.50 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 45 bu. 4/1-9/15 175 0 0 N/A 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3673 1-4 UI Badin 20.80 20.80 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/3(i 98 0 0 Broad. 98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3673 1-4 Ul Badin 20.80 20.80 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad. 135 22.00 0.00 457.66 0.00
3675 176 Ul Badin 14.90 14.90 Corn,Grain 110 bu. 2/15-6/30 119 0 20 Broad. 99 16.14 0.00 240.42 0.00
3675 1-6 UI Badin 14.90 14.90 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 8115-11/3f 98 0 0 Broad. 58 9.45 0.00 140.85 0.00
456128 Database Version.3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 WUT Page 2 of 16

Waste Utili ..,_in Table Lear i
Nilroger, Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (Ibs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
3675 1-6 S1 Badin 14.90 14.90 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/31 98 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 138.60
3675 7 U1 Congaree 3.50 3.50 Corn,Grain 147 bu. 2/15-6/30 163 0 0 Broad. 163 26.57 0.00 92.98 0.00
3675 7 UI Congaree 3.50 3.50 Wheat,Grain 49 bu. 8/15-11/30 98 0 0 Broad. 98 15.97 0.00 55.90 0.00
3680 1,2,4,5,6, U I Badin 42.67 42.00 Corn,Grain 114 bu. 2/15-6/30 123 0 20 Broad. 63 10.27 0.00 263.89 011
3680 1,2,4,5,6, S1 Badin 42.67 42.00 Corn,Grain 114 bu. 2/15-6/30 123 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 239.07
3680 1,2,4,5,6, U1 Badin 42.67 42.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/30 100 0 0 Broad. 0 9.78 0.00 251.32 0.00
3680 1,2,4,5,6, Sl Badin 42.67 42.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/30 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 239.07
3682 1 U1 Badin 6.00 6.00 Corn,Grain 110 bu. 2/15-6/30 119 0 0 Broad. 119 19.40 0.00 116.37 0.00
3682 1 U1 Badin 6.00 6.00 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. "-8/15-11/30 98 0 0 Broad. 98 15.97 0.00 95.84 0.00
3683 1-3 Ul Tatum 31.78 31.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 48/15-11/3C 100 0 0 Broad. 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3683 1-3 U1 Tatum 31.78 31.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 139 22.66 0,00 702.30 0.00
3684 1-2 Ul Badin 27.50 27.50 Corn,Grain 110 bu. 2/15-6/30 119 0 20 Broad. 99 16.14 0.00 443.72 0.00
3684 1-2" U1 Badin 27.50 27.50 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 8/15-11/3f 98 0 0 Broad. 58 9.45 0.00 259.96 0.00
3684 1-2 S1 Badin 27.50 27.50 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 48/15-11/30 98 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 255.$)-
3686 1,2 U1 Badin 8.22 8.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/30 100 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3686 1,2 U1 Badin 8.22 8.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 1391 22.66 0.00 113.27 0.00
3840 1 S1 Georgeville 16.65 16.60 Cotton 665lbs. 3/15-7/31 49 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 154.42
3840 1 S1 Georgeville 16.65 16.60 Wheat,Grain 57 bu. 8/15-11/3e 110 0 0 Broad: 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 154.42
3846 1-9 Sl Badin 69.64 65.00 Corn,Grain 110 bu. 2/15-6/30 119 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 604.64
3846 1-9 Sl Badin 69.64 65.00 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/30 98 0 0 Broad. 80 0.00 9.30 0.00 604.64
3848 12 Sl Tarrus 9.41 9.00 Cotton 641 Ibs. 3/15-7/31 47 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 83.72
3848 12 S1 Tarnis 9.41 9.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/30 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 83.72
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 WUT Page 3 of 16

Waste Utiliti, i Table ear 1
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fen. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic, 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
3855 7,9 Sl Tarrus 18.61 18.00 Cotton 641 lbs. 3/15-7/31 47 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 167.44
3855 7,9 S1 Tarrus 18.61 18.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/30 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 167.44
3889 1,2 S1 Goldston 18.221 18.00 Cotton 437lbs. 3/15-7/31 52 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 167.44
3889 1,2 S1 Goldston 18.22 18.00 Wheat,Grain 37 bu. 8/15-11/31 89 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 167.4,1
3897 1,2 Sl Tarrus 16.88 16.00 Cotton 641 lbs. 3/15-7/31 47 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 148.8.E
3897 1,2 Sl Tarrus 16.88 16.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/30 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9,301 0.00 148.83
3899 1,2 81 Badin 13.11 13.00 Conn,Grain 110 bu. 2/15-6/30 119 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 120.93
3899 1,2 S1 Badin 13.11 13.00 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 4/15-11/3C 98 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 120.93
3929 l Sl Tarrus 17.17 17.00 Cotton 641 lbs. 3/15-7/31 47 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 158.14
3929 1 Sl rarrus 17.17 17.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/30 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 158.14
8900 All Sl Goldston 11.18 11.00 Cotton 437 lbs. 3/15-7/31 52 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 102.32
8900 All Sl Goldston 11.18 11.00 Wheat,Grain 37 bu. *8/15-11/3l 89 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 102.32
8945 1 Sl Tatum 24.00 24.00 Cotton 621 lbs. 3/15-7/31 45 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 223.25
8945 1 Sl Tatum 24.00 24.00 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/3t 98 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 223.25
9288 1,2 Sl Badin 9.37 9.00 Corn,Grain 114 bu. 2/15-6/30 123 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 83.'o_
9288 1,2 S1 Badin 9.37 9.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 418/15-11/3C 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.001 9.30 0.00 83.72
9310 3,5,23 SI Georgeville 11.41 10.00 Cotton 665 lbs. 3/15-7/31 49 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 93.02
9310 3,5,23 Sl Georgeville 11.41 10.00 Wheat,Grain 57 bu. 8/15-11/3 110 0 1 0 1 Broad. 40 0.00 9,307 0.00 93.02
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 WUT Page 4 of 16

Waste Utili2; i Table ear 1
Niuu@en (.roll. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquiu Solid
PA Fert. (Ibs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(Ibs/A) (llbs/A) (Ibs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field I ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method I N I gal/A I Tons 1000 gals tons
Total Applied, 1000 gallons 6,149.08
Total Produced, 1000 gallons 877.80
Balance, 1000 gallons -5,271.28
Total Applied,tons 8,627.77
Total Produced,tons 4,250.00
Balance,tons -4,377
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 2. Symbol*means user entered data.
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 WUT Page 5 of 16

Waste Utiliz:_ _a Table _ Fear 2
Nitru,vik Cotnm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (Ibs/A)I PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applio, ]000
Tract Field ]D Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
10043 1 SI Tatum 11.20 11.00 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/3 C 98 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 102.32
10043 1 S1 Tatum 11.20 11.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 102.32
10044 1-2 S1 Tatum 22.10 22.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/3(1 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 204.65
10044 1-2 S1, Tatum 22.10 22.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 204."
10083 1-2 U1 Badin 14.70 14.70 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/3(i 98 0 0 Broad. 98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
10083 1-2 UI Badin 14.70 14.70 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad. 80 13.04 0.00 191.67 0.00
10083 1-2 St Badin 14.70 14.70 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 136.74
10083 1-2 U1 Badin 14.70 14.70 Fescue Hay 3.7 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 0 20 Broad. 50 8.15 0.00 119.79 0.00
10083 1-2 S1 Badin 14.70 14.70 Fescue Hay 3.7 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 0 20 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
10084 5-11 U1 Badin 11.08 11.00 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/30 98 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
10084 5-11 UI Badin 11.08 11.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad. 135 22.00 0.00 189.22 0.00
10327 All Ul Tatum 16.48 16.00 Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 133 0 0 Broad. 93 15.16 0.00 216.75 0.00
10327 All S1 Tatum 16.48 16.00 Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 133 .0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 133.02
11344 1-8 SI Goldston 18.56 18.00 Fescue Hay 3.3 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 401 0.00 9.30 0.00 167.0
2900 1 SI Badin 3.08 3.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. "8/15-11/3C 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 27.91
2900 1 SI Badin 3.08 3.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 27.91
3086 2,3 SI Badin 18.49 18:00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/30 100 0 0 Broad. 80 0.00 9.30 0.00 167.44
3086 2,3 S1 Badin 18.49 18.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 167.44
3097 1 SI Goldston 12.68 12.00 Wheat,Grain 38 bu. 8/15-11/30 91 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 111.63
3097 1 l S1 Goldston 12.68 12.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 24 bu. 4/1-9/15 96 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 111.63
3097 2-3 S1 Badin 11.71 11.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 8/15-11/30 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30. 0.00 102.32
3097 2-3 SI Badin 11.71 11.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/1 I139 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 10232
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 WUT Page 6 of 16

Waste Utilii 1 Table ear 2
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (Ibs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
3117 1-3 S1 Badin 24.65 23.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11130 100 0 0 Broad, 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 213,95
3117 1-3 SI Badin 24.65 23.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 213.95
3228 1,2 S1 Goldston 12.73 12.00 Wheat,Grain 37 bu. *8/15-11/3+. 89 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 111.63
3228 1,2 S1 Goldston 12.73 12.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 23 bu. 4/1-9/15 92 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 111
3634 1 U1 Badin 1.80 7.80 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/31 98 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3634 1 Ul Badin 7.80 7.80 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad. 135 22.00 0.00 171.62 0.00
3668 1,2,3 U1 Badin 28.90 28.90 Corn,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 0 20 Broad. 160 26.08 0.00 753.64 0.00
3668 1,2,3 SI Badin 28.90 28.90 Corn,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 268.83
3670 1-10 U1 Tatum - 66.40 66.40 Corn,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 0 20 Broad. 160 26.08 0.00 1,731.54 0.00
3670 1-10 S1 Tatum 66A0 66.40 Corn,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 617.66
3670. 11-15 Ul Congaree 15.50 15.50 Corn,Silage 27.4 2/15-6/30 299 0 20 Broad. 100 16.30 0.00 252.63 0.00
3670 11-15 S1 Congaree 15.50 15.50 Corn,Silage 27.4 2/15-6/30 299 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 144A8
3673 1-4 UI Badin 20.801 20.80 Corn,Silage 20.2 2/15-6/30 216 0 20 Broad. 156 25.43 0.00 528.85 0.00
3673 1-4 81 Badin 20.80 20.80 Corn,Silage 20.2 2/15-6/30 216 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 193.49„-,.
3675 1-6 U1 Badin 14.90 14.90 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/30 98 0 0 Broad. 58 9.45 0.00 140.85 0.0u
3675 1-6 S1 Badin 14.90 14.90 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/30 98 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 138.60
3675 1-6 UI Badin 14.901 14.90 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad. 95 15.48 0.00 230.70 0.00
3675 1-6 S1 Badin 14.90 14.90 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad, 40 0.00 9.30 .0.00 138.60
3675 7 Ul Congaree 3.50 3.50 Wheat,Grain 49 bu. *8/15-11/3'j 98 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3675 7 Ul Congaree 3.50 3.50 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 45 bu. 4/1-9/15 175 0 0 Broad. 135 22.00 0.00 77.01 0.00
3675 7 S1 Congaree 3.50 3.50 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 45 bu. 4/1-9/15 175 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 32.56
3680 1,2,4,5,6, U1 Badin 42.67 42.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/3C 100 0 0 Broad. 0 9.78 0.00 251.32 0.00
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 WUT Page 7 of 16

Waste Utiliz t Table ear 2
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. ('Ibs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
3680 1,2,4,5,6, SI Badin 42.67 42.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 1*8/15-11/3(1 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 239.07
3680 1,2,4,5,6, U1 Badin 42.67 42.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 991 16.14 0.00 414.68 0.00
3680 1,2;4,5,6, S1 Badin 42.67 42.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 239.07
3680 1,2,4,5,6, U1 Badin 42.67 42.00 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 20 Broad. 0 8.56 0.00 219.91 0.�^
3680 1,2,4,5,6, SI Badin 42.67 42.00 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 20 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.Ou
3682 1 U1 Badin 6.00 6.00 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 8/15-11/30 98 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3682 1 U1 Badin 6.001 6.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad. 135 22.00 0.00 132.02 0.00
3683 1-3 U1 Tatum 31.78 31.00 Corn,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 0 20 Broad. 164 26.73 0.00 828.61 0.00
3683 1-3 SI Tatum 31.78 31.00 Corn,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 j 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 288.36
3684 1-2 U1 Badin 27.50 27.50 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/30 98 0 0 Broad. 58 9.45 .0.00 259.96 0.00
3684 1-2 S1 Badin 27.50 27.50 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/311 98 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 255.81
3684 1-2 U1 Badin 27.50 27.50 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad. 95 15.48 0.00 425.80 0.00
3684 1-2 S1 Badin 27.50 27.50 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 255.81
3686 1,2 U1 Badin. 8.22 8.00 Corn,Silage 20.9 2/15-6/30 224 0 20 Broad. 200 32.60 0.00 162.98 0.00„,
3840 1 S1 Georgeville 16.65 16.60 Wheat,Grain 57 bu. *8/15-11/3t 110 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 154.4�
3840 1 S1 Georgeville 16.65 16.60 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 40 bu. 4/1-9/15 155 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 154.42
3846 1-9 S1 Badin 69.64 65.00 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/3 f 98 0 O Broad. 80 0.00 9.30 0.00 604.64
3846 1-9 Sl Badin 69.64 65.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 604.64
3848 12 S1 .Tarrus 9.41 9.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 4/15-1.1/30 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 83.72
3848 12 SI Tarrus 9.41 9.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 411-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 83.72
3855 7,9 SI Tarrus 18.61 18.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/30 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 167.44
3855 1 7,9 S1 Tarrus 18.61 18.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu: 4/1-9/15 E139 0 0 1 Broad. 40 0.00 9:30 0.00 167.44
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 WUT Page 8 of 16.

Waste Utilk, a Table Rear 2
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
3889 1,2 S1 Goldston 18.22 18.00 Wheat,Grain 37 bu. *8/15-11/3C 89 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 167.44
3889 1,2 S1 Goldston 18.22 18.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 23 bu. 4/1-9/15 92 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9,30 0.00 167.44
3897 1,2 S1 Tarrus 16.88 16.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 8/15-11/30 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 148.83
3897 1,2 SI Tarrus 16.88 16.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 1 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 148,P-I ,,
3899 1,2 S1 Badin 13.11 13.00 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/3U 98 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 120.93
3899 1,2 Sl Badin 13.11 13.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 120.93
3929 1 S1 Tarrus 17.17 17.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 8/15-11/3C 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 158.14
3929 1 Sl Tarrus 17.17 17.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 158.14
8900 All S1 Goldston 11.18 11.00 Wheat,Grain 37 bu. *8/15-11/3(l 89 0 0 1 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 102.32
8900 All Sl Goldston 11.18 11.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 23 bu. 4/1-9/15 92 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 102.32
8945 1 S1 Tatum 24.00 24.00 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/30 98 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 223.25
8945 1 Sl Tatum 24.00 24.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 223.25
9288 1,2 S1 Badin 9.37 9.001 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/3C 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 930 0.00 83.72
9288 1,2 Sl Badin 9.37 9.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 83.72,.
9310 3,5,23 S1. Georgeville 11.41 10.00 Wheat,Grain 57 bu. 8/15-11/3. 110 0 0 Broad, 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 93.0.
9310 3,5,23 S1 Georgeville 11.41 10.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 40 bu. 4/1-9/15 155 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 93.02
Total Applied, 1000 gallons 7,299.55
Total Produced,1000 gallons 877.80
Balance,1000 gallons -6,421.75
Total Applied,tons 9,548.68
Total Produced,tons 4,250,00
Balance,tons -5,298.68
Notes: 1. In the tract column,-symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 2. Symbol *means user entered data.
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 WUT Page 9 of 16

Waste Utilii a Table ear 3
Nitrogen Canm, Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA 1?ert. (Ibs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A)
Source Total Use, Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
10043 1 S1 Tatum 11.20 11.00 Corn,Grain 110 bu. 2/15-6/30 119 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 102.32
10044 1-2 Sl Tatum 22.10 22.00 Corn,Grain 114 bu. 2/15-6/30 123 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 204.65
10083 1-2 Ul Badin 14.70 14.70 Fescue Hay 3.7 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 0 0 Broad. 50 8.15 0.00 119.79 0.00
10083 1-2 St Badin 14.70 14.70 Fescue Hay 3.7 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 136.
10084 5-11 U1 Badin 11.08 11.00 Corn,Grain 110 bu. 2/15-6130 119 0 0 Broad. 119 19.40 0.00 166.80 0.00
10084 5-11 Ul Badin 11.08 11.00 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/3C 98 0 0 Broad. 98 15.97 0,00 137.36 0.00
10327 All U1 Tatum 16.48 16.00 Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 133 0 0 Broad, 93 15.16 0.00 216.75 0.00
10327 All SI Tatum 16.48 16.00 Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 133 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 133.02
11344 1-8 S1 Goldston 18.56 18.00 Fescue Hay 3.3 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 167.44
2900 1 S1 Badin 3.08 3.00 Corn,Grain 114 bu. 2/15-6/30 123 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 27.91
3086 2,3 S1 Badin 18.49 18.00 Cotton 665 lbs. 3/15-7/31 49 0 20 Broad. 29 0.00 6.74 0.00 121.39
3097 1 S1 Goldston 12.68 12.00 Cotton 451 lbs. 3/15-7/31 54 0 20 Broad. 34 0.00 7.91 0.00 94.88
3097 2-3 S1 IBadin 11.71 11.00 Cotton 665 lbs. 3/15-7/31 49 0 20 Broad. 29 0.00 6.74 0.00 74.18
3117 1-3 SI Badin 24.65 23.00 Cotton 665 lbs. 3/15-7/31 49 0 20 Broad. 29 0.00 6.74 0.00 155.0 '--
3228 1,2 SI Goldston 12.73 12.00 Corn,Grain 74 bu. 2/15-6/30 92 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 111.6s
3634 1 U I Badin 7.80 7.80 Corn,Grain 110 bu. 2/15-6/30 119 0 0 Broad. 119 19.40 0.00 151.28 0.00
3634 1 U1 Badin 7.80 7.80 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/31. 98 0 0 Broad. 98 15.97 0.00 124.59 0.00
3668 1,2,3 U1 Badin 28.90 28.90 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/30 100 0 0 Broad. 60 9.78 0.00 282.61 0.00
3668 1,2,3 SI Badin 28.90 28.90 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/3o i00 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 268.83
3670 1-10 U1 Tatum 66.40 66.40 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 8/15-11/3() 100 0 0 Broad. 60 9.78 0.00 649.33 0.00
3670 1-10 S1 Tatum 66.40 66.40 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 8/15-11/3 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 617.66
3670 11-15 Ul Congaree 15.50 15.50 Wheat,Grain 49 bu. *8/15-11/31 98 0 1 0 1 Broad. 98 15.97 0.00 247.57 0.00
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:6/11/2012 WUT Page 10 of 16

Waste Wilk n Table ear 3
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (Ibs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
3673 1-4 U1 Badin 20.80 20.80 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 8/15-11/30 98 0 0 Broad. 98 15.97 0.00 332.23 0.00
3675 1-6 U1 Badin 14.90 14.90 Corn,Grain 110 bu. 2/15-6/30 119 0 20 Broad. 99 16.14 0.00 240.42 0.00
3675 1-6 U1 Badin 14.901 14.90 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-I1/31 98 0 0 Broad. 58 9.45 0.00 140.85 0.00
r3675 1-6 SI Badin 14.90 14.90 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/31 98 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 138.F^
3675 7 U1 Congaree 3.50 3.50 Corn,Grain 147 bu. 2/15-6/30 163 0 0 Broad. 163 26.57 0.00 92.98 O.Ou
3675 7 U1 Congaree 3.50 3.50 Wheat,Grain 49 bu. 8/15-11/30 98 0 0 Broad. 98 15.97 0.00 55.90 0.00
3680 1,2,4,5,6, Ul Badin 42.67 42.00 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 0 8,56J 0.00 219.91 0.00
3680 1,2,4,5,6, S1 Badin 42.67 42.00 Fescue Hay 3.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 9.30 0.00 239.07
3682 1 U 1 Badin 6.00 6.00 Corn,Grain 110 bu. 2115-6/30 119 0 0 Broad. 119 19.40 0.00 116.37 0.00
3682 1 U1 Badin 6.00 6.00 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/3u 98 0 0 Broad. 981 15.97 0.00 95.84 0.00
3683 1-3 U1 Tatum 31.78 31.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/3u 100 0 0 Broad. 100 16.30 0.001 505.25 0.00
3684 1-2 U1 Badin 27.50 27.50 Corn,Grain 110 bu. 2/15-6/30 119 0 20 Broad. 99 16.14 0.00 443.72 0.00
3684 1-2 U1 Badin 27.50 27.50 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 1-8/15-11/30 98 0 0 Broad. 58 9.45 0.00 259.96 0.00
3684 1-2 S1 Badin 27.50 27.50 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. IV15-11/30 98 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 255.81
3686 1,2 Ul Badin 8.22 8.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 1:8/15-11/30 100 0 20 Broad. 80 13.04 0.00 65.19 O.t,.
3840 1 Sl Georgeville 16.65 16.60 Corn,Grain 119 bu. 2/15-6/30 129 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 154.42
3846 1-9 St Badin 69.64 65.00 Cotton 644lbs. 3/15-7/31 47 0 20 Broad. 27 0.001 6.28 0.00 408.13
3848 12 S1 Tarrus 9.41 9.00 Corn,Grain 114 bu. 2/15-6/30 123 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.301 0.00 83.72
3855 7,9 S1 Tarrus 18.61 18.00 Corn,Grain 114 bu. 2/15-6/30 123 0 20 Broad, 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 167.44
3889 1,2 SI Goldston 18.22 18.00 Corn,Grain 74 bu.. 2/15-6/30 92 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 167.44
3897 1,2 S1 Tarrus 16.88 16.00 Corn,Grain 114 bu. 2/15-6/30 123 0 20 Broad, 40 0.001 9.30 0.00 148.83
3899 1,2 S1 Badin 13.11 13.00 Cotton 644lbs. 3/15-7/31 47 0 20 Broad. 27 0.00 6.28 0.00 81.63
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 WUT Page 11 of 16

Waste Utili , A Table ear 3
Nitrogen Comm. Res, Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (Ibs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
3929 1 S1 Tarrus 17.17 17.00 Corn,Grain 114 bu. 2/15-6/30 123 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 158.14
8900 All S1 Goldston 11.18 11.00 Corn,Grain 74 bu. 2/15-6/30 92 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.301 0.00 102.32
8945 1 S1 Tatum 24.00 24.00 Co.,Grain 110 bu. 2/15-6/30 119 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 223.25
9288 1,2 S1 Badin 9.37 9.00 Cotton 665 lbs. 3/15-7/31 49 0 20 Broad. 291 0.00 6.74 0.00 60.-
9310 3,5,23 S1 Georgeville 11.41 10.00 Corn,Grain 119 bu. 2/15-6/30 129 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 93.02
Total Applied,1000 gallons 4,664.71
Total Produced, 1000 gallons 877.80
Balance,1000 gallons -3,786.91
Total Applied,tons 4,698.28
Total Produced,tons 4,250.00
Balance,tons -448.28
Notes: 1. In the tract column,-symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 2. Symbol*means user entered data.
4561.28 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 WUT Page 12 of 16

Waste Utiliz; n Table ear 4
lv!'.r+:3cn Canm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(lbs/A) (Ilbs/A) (Ibs/A)
Source TolaI Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID I Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
10043 1 S1 Tatum 11.20 11.00 Cotton 621 lbs. 3/15-7/31 45 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 102.32
10043 1 S1 Tatum 11.20 11.00 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 8/15-11/3t 98 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 102.32
10044 1-2 St Tatum 22.10 22.00 Cotton 641 tbs. 3/15-7/31 47 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 204.65
10044 1-2 S1 Tatum 22.10 22.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/30 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 204.F,"
10084 5-11 U1 Badin 11.08 11.00 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/3C 98 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
10084 5-11 Ul Badin 11.08 11.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad. 135 22.00 0.00 189.22 0.00
10327 All Ul Tatum. 16.48 16.00 Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 133 0 0 Broad. 93 15.16 0.00 216.75 0.00
10327 All S1 Tatum 16.48 16.00 Fescue Pasture 4.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 133 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 133.02
11344 1-8 SI Goldston 18.56 18.00 Fescue Hay 3.3 Tons 8/1-7/31 165 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 167.44
2900 1 SI Badin 3.08 3.00 Cotton 665 tbs. 3/15-7/31 49 0 0 Broad, 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 27.91
2900 1 S1 Badin 3.08 3.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 8/15-11/30 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 27.91
3086 2,3 S1 Badin 18.49 18.00 Corn,Grain 114 bu. 2/15-6/30 123 0 20 Broad. 40 0.001 9.30 0.00 167.44
3086 2,3 Sl Badin 18.49 18.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/3t. 100 0 0 Broad. 80 0.00 9.30 0.00 167.44
3097 1 S1 Goldston 12.68 12.00 Corn,Grain 76 bu. 2/15-6/30 95 0 20 Broad. 40 0,00 9.30 0.00 111.6?11
3097 1 S1 Goldston 12.68 12.00 Wheat,Grain 38 bu. 8/15-11/30 91 0 0 Broad. 401 0.00 9.301 0.00 111.613
3097 2-3 St Badin 11.71 11.00 Corn,Grain 114 bu. 2/15-6/30 123 0 20 Broad, 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 102.32
3097 2-3 S1 Badin 11.71 11.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 8/15-11/30 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 102.32
3117 1-3 S1 Badin 24.65 23.00 Corn,Grain 114 bu. 2/15-6/30 123 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 213.95
3117 1-3 S1 Badin 24.65 23.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/3(.1 100 0 0 Broad, 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 213.95
3228 1,2 S1 Goldston 12.73 12.00 Cotton 437 tbs. 3/15-7/31 52 0 0 Broad. 40 0,00 9.30 0.00 111.63
3228 1,2 S1 Goldston 12.73 12.00 Wheat,Grain 37 bu. 8/15-11/30 89 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 111.63
3634 1 U1 Badin 7.80 7.80 1 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 8/15-11/30 98 0 0 Broad. 01 0.001 0.00 0.00 0.00
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:6/11/2012 WUT Page 13 of 16

Waste Utilii n Table ear 4
Narogen Comin. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (Ibs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic, Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres L Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
3634 1 U 1 Badin 7.80 7.80 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad. 135 22.00 0.00 171.62 0.00
3668 1,2,3 U I Badin 28.90 28.90 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 8/15-11/3t 100 0 0 Broad. 60 9.78 0.00 282.61 0.00
3668 1,2,3 SI Badin 28.90 28.90 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/3( 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.301 0.00 268.83
3668 1,2,3 U1 Badin 28.90 28.90 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 Broad. 99 16.14 0.00 466.31 0,�^
3668 1,2,3 Sl Badin 28.90 28.90 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15. 139 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 268.83
3670 1-10 UI Tatum 66.40 66.40 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-11/3u 100 0 0 Broad. 60 9.78 0.00 649.33 0.00
3670 1-10 S1 Tatum 66.40 66.40 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 8/15-11/30 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 617.66
3670 1-10 N/A Tatum 66.40 66.40 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139 0 0 N/A 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3670 11-15 UI Congaree 15.50 15.50 Wheat,Grain 49 bu. *8/15-111/30 98 0 0 Broad. 98 15.97 0.00 247.57 0.00
3670 11-15 N/A Congaree 15.50 15.50 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 45 bu. 4/1-9/15 175 0 0 N/A 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3673 1-4 U1 Badin 20.80 20.80 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-1 l/31 98 0 0 Broad. 98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3673 1-4 UI Badin 20.80 20.80 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad. 135 22.00 0.00 457.66 0.00
3675 1-6 UI Badin 14.90 14.90 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/30 98 0 0 Broad. 58 9.45 0.001 140.85 0.00
3675 1-6 SI Badin 14.90 14.90 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. 8/15-11/30 98 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 138.60..,
3675 1-6 U1 Badin 14.90 14.90 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad. 95 15.48 0.00 230.70 0.1,
3675 1-6 S1 Badin 14.90 14.90 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 138.60
3675 7 U1 Congaree 3.50 3.50 Wheat,Grain 49 bu. *8/15-11/3C 98 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3675 7 U1 Congaree 3.50 3.50 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 45 bu. 4/1-9/15 175 0 0 Broad. 135 22.00 0.00 77.01 0.00
3675 7 SI Congaree 3.50 3.50 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 45 bu. 4/1-9/15 175 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 32.56
3682 1 UI Badin 6.00 6.00 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/3C 98 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.001 0.00 0.00
3682 1 Ul Badin 6.00 6.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad. 1351 22.00 0.00 132.02 0.00
3683 1-3 U1 Tatum 31.78 31.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 615-11/30 100, 0 0 Broad.. 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/N12 WUT Page 14 of 16

Waste Utlk _ in Table Year 4
Nitrogn Canal. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fen. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID I Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
3683 1-3 U1 Tatum 31.78 31.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15 139, 0 0 Broad. 139 22.66 0.00 702.30 0.00
3684 1-2 U1 Badin 27.50 27.50 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/30 98 0 0 Broad. 58 9.45 0.00 259.96 0.00
3684 1-2 S1 Badin 27.50 27.50 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/30 98 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 255.81
3684 1-2 Ul Badin 27.50 27.50 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad. 95 15.48 0.00 425.80 O.T"
3684 1-2 S1 Badin 27.50 27.50 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 35 bu. 4/1-9/15 135 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 255.81
3686 1,2 UI Badin 8.22 8.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. r8/15-11/3C 100 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3686 1,2 U1 Badin 8.22 8.00 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 36 bu. 4/1-9/15_ 139 0 0 Broad. 139 22.66 0.00 113.27 0.00
3840 1 SI Georgeville 16.65 16.60 Cotton 665 lbs. 3/15-7/31 49 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 154.42
3840 1 S1 Georgeville 16.65 16.60 Wheat,Grain 57 bu. *8/15-11/3t 110 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 154.42
3846 1-9 Sl Badin 69.64 65.00 Corn,Grain 110 bu. 2/15-6/30 119 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 604.64
3846 1-9 Sl Badin 69.64 65.00 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-1 l/3( 98 0 0 Broad. 80 0.00 9.30 0.00 604.64
3848 12 S1 Tarrus 9.41 9.00 Cotton 641 lbs. 3/15-7/31 47 0 0 Broad. 401 0.00 9.30 0.00 83.72
3848 12 SI Tarrus 9.41 9.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 8/15-11/30 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 83.72
3855 7,9 S1 Tarrus 18.61 18.00 Cotton 641 lbs. 3/15-7/31 47 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 167.4.?1
3855 7,9 SI Tarrus 18.61 18.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu, 8/15-11/31. 100 0 j 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 167.44
3889 1,2 S1 Goldston 18.22 18.00 Cotton 437 lbs. 3/15-7/31 52 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 167.44
3889 1,2 S1 Goldston 18.22 18.00 Wheat,Grain 37 bu. *8/15-11/3+: 89 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0,00 167.44
3897 1,2 S1 Tarrus 16.88 16.00 Cotton 641 lbs. 3/15-7/31 47 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 148.83
3897 1,2 S1 Tarrus 16.88 16.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-1 1/3C 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 148.83
3899 1,2 Sl Badin 13.11 13.00 Corn,Grain 110 bu. 2/15-6/30 119 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 120.93
3899 1,2 Sl Badin 13.11 13.00 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/30 98 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 120.93
3929 1 S1 Tarrus 17.17 17.00 Cotton 641 lbs. 3/15-7/31 47 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 158.14
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:6/11/2012 WUT Page 15 of 16

Waste Utili2, n Table ear 4
Nitrogen COMM, Res, Manure Liquid Solid Liquid` Solid
PA Fort. (Ibs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(lbs/A) (IbslA) (IbslA)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field 1D Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
3929 1 S1 Tarrus 17.17 17.00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. *8/15-1 l/3[ 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 158.14
8900 All S1 Goldston 11.18 11.00 Cotton 437 lbs. 3/15-7/31 52 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 102.32
8900 All S1 Goldston 11-181 11.00 Wheat,Grain 37 bu. 8/15-11/3( 89 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 102.32
8945 1 SI Tatum 24.00 24.00 Cotton 621 lbs. 3/15-7/31 45 0 0 .
Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 223.?, .,
8945 I Sl Tatum 24.00 24.00 Wheat,Grain 51 bu. *8/15-11/3 98 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 223.2)
9288 1,2 S1 Badin 9.37 9.00 Corn,Grain 114 bu. 12/15-6/30 123 0 20 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 83.72
9288 1,2 S1 Badin 9.37 9,00 Wheat,Grain 52 bu. 8/15-11/3. 100 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 6.00 83.72
9310 3,5,23 SI Georgeville 11.41 10.00 Cotton 665 lbs. 3/15-7/31 49 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9,30 0.00 93.02
9310 3,5,23 S1 Georgeville 11.41 10.00 Wheat,Grain 57 bu. *8/15-11/3t 110 0 0 Broad. 40 0.00 9.30 0.00 93.02
Total Applied, 1000 gallons 4,762.99
Total Produced, 1000 gallons 877.80
Balance,1000 gallons -3,885.19
Total Applied,tons J-4,3226.60
F:� Total Produced,tons
Balance,tons
Notes: 1. In the tract column,-symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 2. Symbol *means user entered data.
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 WUT Page 16 of 16

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient
management plan developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops
for each year of the plan. Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown,their nutrient
requirements and soil test results. The quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However,the quantity of
other nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other
byproducts are utilized to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the
application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of
this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations,additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources
may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
YEAR O
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons(A)
Tract I Field 3668 1,2,3 Req'd Nutrients 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 28.90 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 52 bu. 06-01-07 Manure 100 83 155 57 2 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 261bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 83 155 57 2 2 0 -1
Tact Field 3670 1-10 Req'd Nutrients 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 66.40 1 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 52 bu. 03-16-10 Manure 100 83 155 57 2 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 261bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 83 155 57 2 2 0 -1
Tract Field 3670 11-15 Req'd Nutrients 98 0 30 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 15.50 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Congaree Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 49 bu. 03-16-10 Manure 98 71 160 61 2 2 1 0
P Removal j Rating 25 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 71 130 61 2 2 1 0
Tract Field 3673 14 Req'd Nutrients 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Acres I App.Period 20.80 1 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 51 bu. 1 03-25-09 Manure 98 71 160 61 21 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 26 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 71 160 61 2
6128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 1 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 0 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (ibs/A) (ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract FField 3683 1-3 Req'd Nutrients 100 70 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 31.00 -8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 52 bu. 06-01-07 Manure 100 72 163 62 2 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 26 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 2 123 621 2 2 1 0
Tract Field 3686 1,2 Req'd Nutrients 100 40 60 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 8.00 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 52 bu. 1 06-01-07 Manure 80 58 130 50 2 1 0 0
P Removal 1 Rating 26 lbs/ac. L.ow BALANCE 0 18 70 50 2 1 0 -1
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.
,6128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 2 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
-- -7
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (tonslA)
Tract Field 10043 1 Req'd Nutrients 98 50 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 11.00 *8/15.-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial FerL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual 01 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 51 bu. 06-11-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 261bs/ac. Low BALANCE -58 -10 57 20 1 1 01 0
Tract Field 10043 1 Req'd Nutrients 45 50 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 11.00 3/15-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Cotton Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 621 lbs. 06-11-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 18 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -5 -10 47 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 10044 1-2 Req'd Nutrients 47 50 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 22.00 3/15-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Cotton Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 641 lbs. 06-11-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 19 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE. -7 -10 47 20 1 1 0 0
Tract I Field 10044 1-2 Req'd Nutrients 100 50 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 22.00 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 52 bu. 06-11-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 26 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -60 -10 57 20 1 1 0 0
Tract I Field 10083 1-2 Req'd Nutrients 98 0 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 14.70 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 51 bu. 1 03-25-09 Manure 98 71 160 61 2 .2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 1 26 lbs/ac. ILow BALANCE 0 71 120 61 2 2 11 0
A28 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 3 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(1bs/A) (lbs/A) (ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (toris/A)
Tract Field 10083 1-2 Req'd Nutrients 119 0 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 14.70 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 110 bu. 03-25-09 Manure 99 72 161 62 2 21 1 0
P Removal Rating 48 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 72 121 62 2 2 1 0
Tract I Field 10084 5-11 Req'd Nutrients 119 0 20 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 11.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 110 bu. 03-25-09 Manure 119 86 194 74 3 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 48 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 86 174 74 3 2 1 -I
Tract I Field 10084 5-11 Req'd Nutrients 98 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 11.00 -8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin . Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
_RYET Sample Date 51 bu. 03-25-09 Manure 98 71 160 61 2 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 26 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 71 140 61 2 2 1 0
Tract I Field 10327 All Req'd Nutrients 133 0 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 16.00 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tam Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.1 Tons 03-25-09 Manure 133 107 209 78 3 3 1 0
P Removal I Rating 7 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 107 199 78 3 3 1 0
Tract Field 11344 1-8 Req'd Nutrients 165 0 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 18.00 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LSoil Series Goldston Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 3.3 Tons 06-11-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 I 1 0 0
Removal Rating 521bs/ac. Low I BALANCE 1 -125 401 47 20 I 1 0 0
128 - Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 4 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (ibs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 2900 1 Req'd Nutrients 49 60 30 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.00 3/15-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Cotton Starter 0 0 0 0 00 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 665 lbs. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 01 0
P Removal Rating 191bs/ac. Low BALANCE -9 -20 27 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 2900 1 Req'd Nutrients 100 60 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 3.00 -8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 52 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 261bs/ac. Low BALANCE -60 -20 37 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 3086 2,3 Req'd Nutrients 123 70 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 18.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 114 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 50 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -63 -30 37 20 1 1 0 0
Tract I Field 3086 2,3 Req'd Nutrients 100 70 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 18.00 -8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 52 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 80 80 114 40 2 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 261bs/ac. Low BALANCE -20 10 94 40 2 2 01 0
Tract Field 3097 1 Req'd Nutrients 95 70 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 12.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By: 0.
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 76 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 33 lbs/ac. Fw BALANCE -35 -30 37 20 1 1 0 0
j6128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 5 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR j N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract I Field 3097 1 Req'd Nutrients 91 70 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 12.00 -8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 38 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 80 114 40 2 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 19 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -51 10 94 40 21 2 0 0
Tract Field 3097 2-3 Req'd Nutrients 100 70 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 11.00 -8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 52 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 80 114 40 2 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 26 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -60 10 94 40 2 2 0 0
Tract I Field 3097 2-3 Req'd Nutrients 123 70 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 11.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 114 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 50 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -63 -30 37 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 3117 1-3 Req'd Nutrients 123 40 0 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 23.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fart. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 114 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 50 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -83 0 57 20 1 1 0 -1
Tract Field 3117 1-3 Req'd Nutrients 100 40 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 23.00 -8/15-11130 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 52 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal 1 Rating 26 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -60 0 57 20 1 1 01 0
,128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 6 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 3228 1,2 Req'd Nutrients 52 10 10 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 12.00 3/15-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Cotton Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 437 lbs. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 13 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -12 30 47 201 1 1 0 -1
Tract Field 3228 1,2 Req'd Nutrients 89 10 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 12.00 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 37 bu. 06-0842 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal a Rating 19 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -49 301 47 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 3634 1 Req'd Nutrients 119 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
fff Acres App.Period 7.80 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 110 bu. 03-25-09 Manure 119 86 194 74 3 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 48 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 76 194 74 3 2 1 0
Tract I Field 3634 1 Req'd Nutrients 98 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 7.80 *8/15-11/30. Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 51 bu. 03-25-09 Manure 98 71 160 61 2 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 26 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 61 160 61 2 2 1 0
Tract Field 3670 1-10 Req'd Nutrients 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 66.40 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual 0 0 01 0 0 01 01 0
RYE I Sample Date 36 bu 1 03-16-10 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 291bslac. Low BALANCE -139 0 0 0 0 01 01 0
j128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 7 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 3670 11-15 Req'd Nutrients 175 0 30 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 15.50 1 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Congaree Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
RYE I Sample Date 45 bu. 03-16-10 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal I Rating 36 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -175 0 -30 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 3673 1-4 Req'd Nutrients 135 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 20.80 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 35 bu. 03-25-09 Manure 135 98 220 84 3 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 28 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 98 220 84 31 2 1 0
Tract Field 3675 1-6 Req'd Nutrients 119 50 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 14.90 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 110 bu. 03-25-09 Manure 99 72 161 62 2 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 48 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 22 151 62 2 2 1 0
Tract I Field 3675 1-6 Req'd Nutrients 98 50 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 14.90 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 .0 01 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 51 bu. 03-25-09 Manure 98 82 151 56 2 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 261bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 32 141 56 2 2 0 0
Tract Field 3675 7 Req'd Nutrients 98 50 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 3.50 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Congaree Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 49 bu_ 1 06-01-07 1 Manurel 98 71 160 61 2 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 25 Ibs%ac. Low I BALANCE 1 0 21 150161 21 2 1 0
6128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 8 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 3675 7 Req'd Nutrients 163 50 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 3.50 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Congaree Residual 0 0 0 0 0j 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 147 bu. 06-01-07 Manure 163 1 118 266 102 3 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 65 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 68 256 102 3 3 1 0
Tract I Field 3680 1,2,4,5,6, Req'd Nutrients 123 100 40 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 42.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Bailin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 114 bu. 06-01-07 Manure 103 75 168 64 2 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 50 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -25 128 641 2 2 1 -1
Tract I Field 3680 1,2,4,5,6, Req'd Nutrients 100 100 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 42.00 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. .01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 52 bu. 06-01-07 Manure 100 72 163 62 2 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 26 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -28 123 62 2 2 1 0
Tract Field 3682 1 Req'd Nutrients 98 50 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 6.00 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 51 bu. 06-01-07 Manure 98 71 160 61 2 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 261bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 21 150 61 2 2 1 0
Tract Field 3682 1 Req'd Nutrients 119 50 10 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 6.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 110 bu. 06-01-07 Manure 119 86 194 74 3 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 48 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 36 184 74 31 21 1 -1
A28 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 9 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 3683 1-3 Req'd Nutrients 139 70 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 31.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 36 bu. 06-01-07 Manure 139 101 226 87 31 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 29 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 31 186 87 3 3 1 0
Tract Field 3684 1-2 Req'd Nutrients 119 30 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 27.50 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 110 bu. 06-01-07 Manure 99 72 161 62 2 2 1 0
P Removal 1 Rating 48 ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 42 151 62 2 2 1 0
Tract j Field 3684 1-2 Req'd Nutrients 98 30 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 27.50 -8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 51 bu. 06-01-07 Manure 98 82 151 56 2 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 261bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 52 141 56 2 2 0 0
Tract Field 3686 1,2 Req'd Nutrients 139 40 60 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 8.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 36 bu. 06-01-07 Manure 139 101 226 87 3 3 1 0
P Removal I Rating 29 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 61 166 87 3 3 1 0
Tract I Field 3840 1 Req'd Nutrients 49 40 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 16.60 3/15-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Cotton Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 665 lbs. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 19 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -9 0 57 20 1 1 0 0
.i128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 10 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 3840 1 Req'd Nutrients 110 40 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 16.60 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 57 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 29 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -70 0 57 20 1 1 0 0
F
ract Field 3846 1-9 Req'd Nutrients 119 0 10 0 0 0 0 1
res App.Period 65.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial FerL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE 1 Sample Date 110 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 48 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -59 40 47 20 1 1 0 -1
Tract Field 3846 I-9 Req'd Nutrients 98 0 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 65.00 -8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 51 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 801 80 114 40 2 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 261bs/ac. Low BALANCE -18 80 104 40 2 2 0 0
Tract Field 3848 12 Req'd Nutrients 100 50 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 9.00 -8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tarrus Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 52 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 01 0
P Removal I Rating 261bs/ac. L.ow BALANCE -60 -10 37 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 3848 12 Req'd Nutrients 47 50 30 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 9.00 3/15-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Cotton Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tames Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 641 lbs. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal IRating 19 lbs/ac. ILow BALANCE -7 -10 27 20 1 1 0 -1
6128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 1 I of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P2O5 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A.) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 3855 7,9 Req'd Nutrients 47 90 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 18.00 3/15-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Cotton Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tarrus Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 641 lbs. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 19 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -7 -50 57 20 1 1 0 0
Tract I Field 3855 7,9 Req'd Nutrients 100 90 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 18.00 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tarrus Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 52 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 26 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -60 -50 57 20 1 1 01 0
Tract Field 3889 1,2 Req'd Nutrients 52 30 30 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 18.00 3/15-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Cotton Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 437 lbs. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 13 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -12 10 27 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 3889 1,2 Req'd Nutrients 89 30 30 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 18.00 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 37 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 19 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 49 10 27 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 3897 1,2 Req'd Nutrients 100 30 50 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 16.00 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tarrus Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 52 bu. ' 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 26 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -60 10 7 20 1 1 0 0
-:a6128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 12 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR j N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
kTract Field 3897 1,2 Req'd Nutrients 47 30 60 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 16.00 3/15-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Cotton Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial FerL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tames Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 641 lbs. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 19 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -7 10 -3 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 3899 1,2 Req'd Nutrients 119 40 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 13.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I,Sample Date 110 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 48 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE -59 0 47 20 1 1 01 0
Tract I Field 3899 1,2 Req'd Nutrients 98 40 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 13.00 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 51 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 01 0
P Removal I Rating 261bs/ac. Low BALANCE -58 0 47 20 1 1 0 0
Tract' Field 3929 1 Req'd Nutrients 47 50 20 0 0 0 0 1
Ac res App.Period 17.00 3/15-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Cotton Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tarrus Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 641 lbs. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 19 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -7 -10 37 20 1 1 0 -1
Tract Field 3929 I Req'd Nutrients 100 50 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 17.00 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tarrus Residual 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 52 bu. 1 06-08-12 Manure 40 401 57 20 1 1 1 01 0
P Removal I Rating 26 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE -60 -10 37 20 1 1 1 0 0
—6128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 13 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 8900 All Req'd Nutrients 52 10 10 0 0 0 0 1
Acres I App.Period 11.00 3/15-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Cotton Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 437 lbs. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 13 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -12 30 47 20 1 1 0 -1
Tract Field 8900 All Req'd Nutrients 89 10 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Periodi 11.00 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0
RYE'Sample Date 37 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 19 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE -49 30 47 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 8945 1 Req'd Nutrients 98 20 30 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 24.00 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 51 bu. 06-11-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 26 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -58 20 27 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 8945 1 Req'd Nutrients 45 20 30 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 24.00 3/15-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Cotton Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 621 lbs. 06-11-12 Manure 40 '40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 181bs/ac. Low BALANCE -5 20 27 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 9288 1,2 Req'd Nutrients 123 40 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 9.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 01 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 114 bu. 1 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 50 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE -63 0 57. 20 1 1 0 0
A128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 14 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(]bs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 9288 1,2 Req'd Nutrients 100 40 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 9.00 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 52 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 401 57 20 1 1 01 0
P Removal I Rating 261bs/ac. LOW BALANCE -60 0 57 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 9310 3,5,23 Req'd Nutrients 49 30 50 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 10.00 3/15-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Cotton Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 665 lbs. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 191bs/ac. Low BALANCE -9 10 7 20 1 1 01 0
Tract Field 9310 3,5,23 Req'd Nutrients 110 30 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 10.00 *8/15-11/30 Supplied By:
CROP Wheat,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 57 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 201 11 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 291bs/ac. Low BALANCE -70 10 17 20 1 1 01
0
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.
6128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 15 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 10043 1 Req'd Nutrients 135 50 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 11.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 35 bu. 06-11-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 28 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -95 -10 57 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 10044 1-2 Req'd Nutrients 139 50 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 22.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE 1 Sample Date 36 bu. 06-11-12 Manure 40 401 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 29 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -99 -10 57 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 10083 1-2 Req'd Nutrients 135 0 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 14.70 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 35 bu. 03-25-09 Manure 120 98 187 70 3 2 0 0
P Removal I Rating 28 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -15 98 147 70 3 2 0 0
Tract Field 10083 1-2 Req'd Nutrients .160 0 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 14.70 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.7 Tons 03-25-09 Manure 140 112 220 82 3 3 1 0
P Removal 1Rating 58 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 112 1 180 82 3 3 1 0
F
ract Field 10084 5-11 Req'd Nutrients 135 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
res I App.Period 11.00 411-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 P 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 35 bu. 1 03-25-09 Manure 135 98 220 84 3 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 28 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 98 200 84 3 2 1 0
,6128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 16 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
[ Tract Field 2900 1 Req'd Nutrients 139 60 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 3.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 36 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 29 Ibs/ac. U,1w BALANCE -99 -20 37 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 3086 2,3 Req'd Nutrients 139 70 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 18.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 36 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal j Rating 291bs/ac. Low BALANCE -99 -30 37 201 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 3097 1 Req'd Nutrients 96 70 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 12.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 24 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 19 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -56 -30 37 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 3097 2-3 Req'd Nutrients 139 .70 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 11.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 36 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 29 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -99 -30 37 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 3117 1-3 Req'd Nutrients 139 40 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 23.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 36 bu. 1 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 29 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE -99 0 57 20 1 1 0 0
6128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 17 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract I Field 3228 1,2 Req'd Nutrients 92 10 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 12.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 23 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 201 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 18 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -52 30 47 20 1 1 01 0
Tract Field 3634 1 Req'd Nutrients 135 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 7.80 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE j Sample Date 35 bu. 03-25-09 Manure 135 98 220 84 3 2 1 0
P Removal I Rating 28 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 88 220 84 3 2 1 0
Tract I Field 3668 1,2,3 Req'd Nutrients 224 0 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 28.90 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 20.9 Tons 06-01-07 Manure 200 156 318 120 4 41 1 0
P Removal I Rating 71 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 4 156 278 120 4 4 1 0
Tract Field 3670 1-10 Req'd Nutrients 224 0 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 66.40 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Com,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tam Residual 201 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 20.9 Tons 03-16-10 Manure 200 156 318 120 4 4 1 0
P Removal I Rating 71 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -4 156 278 120 4 4 1 0
Tract Field 3670 11-15 Req'd Nutrients 299 20 80 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 15.50 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Congaree Residual 20 0 0 01 0 01 01 0
RYE I Sample Date 27A Tons 1 03-16-10 Manure 140 112 220 82 3 3 1 0
P Removal I Rating 93 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -139 92 140 82 3 3 1 1 0
-.A128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 18 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract I Field 3673 1-4 Req'd Nutrients 216 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 20.80 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 20.2 Tons 03-25-09 Manure 196 153 311 117 41 4 1 0
P Removal I Rating 69 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 153 311 117 4 41 1 0
Tract Field 3675 1-6 Req'd Nutrients 135 50 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 14.90 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 35 bu. 03-25-09 Manure 135 109 212 79 3 3 1 0
P Removal I Rating 28 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 59 202 79 3 3 1 0
Tract Field 3675 7 Req'd Nutrients 175 50 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.50 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Congaree Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 45 bu. 06-01-07 Manure 175 127 285 109 4 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 36 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 77 275 I09 4 3 1 0
Tract Field 3680 1,2,4,5,61 Req'd Nutrients 139 100 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 42.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans;Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badiri Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 36 bu. 06-01-07 Manure 139 101 226 87 3 3 '1 0
P Removal Rating 29 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 1 186 87 3 3 1 0
Tract Field 3680 1,2,4,5,6, Req'd Nutrients 165 0 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 42.00 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 201 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 3.8 Tons 06-01-07 Manure 145 105 236 90 3 3 1 0
P Removal I Rating 60 lbs/ac. L.ow I BALANCE 0 105 196 90 3 3 1 0
—6128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 19 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 3682 1 Req'd Nutrients 135 50 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 6.00 1 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 35 bu. 06-01-07 Manure 135 98 220 84 3 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 28 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 48 210 84 3 2 1 0
Tract I Field 3683 1-3 Req'd Nutrients 224 80 90 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 31.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 20.9 Tons 06-01-07 Manure 204 159 324 122 4 4 1 0
P Removal I Rating 71 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 79 234 122 4 4 1 0
Tract Field 3684 1-2 Req'd Nutrients 135 30 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 27.50 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 35 bu. 06-01-07 Manure 135 109 212 79 3 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 28 Lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 79 202 79 3 3 1 0
Tract Field 3686 1,2 Req'd Nutrients 224 60 120 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 8.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 20.9 Tons 06-01-07 Manure 200 145 326 125 4 4 1 0
P Removal Rating 71 ibs/ac. Low BALANCE -4 85 206 125 4 4 1 0
Tract Field 3840 1 Req'd Nutrients 155 40 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 16.60 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 01 01 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 40 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 32 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -115 0 57 20 1 1 0 0
A128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 20 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N. P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 3846 1-9 1 Req'd Nutrients 135 0 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 65.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
RYE I Sample Date 35 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 28 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -95 40 47 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 3848 12 Req'd Nutrients 139 50 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 9.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tarrus Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE LSample Date 36 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 29 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -99 -10 37 20 1 1 01 0
Tract I Field 3855 7,9 Req'd Nutrients 139 90 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 18.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tames Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 36 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 29 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -99 -50 57 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field' 3889 1,2 Req'd Nutrients 92 30 30 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 18.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 23 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 01 0
P Removal I Rating 18 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -52 10 27 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 3897 1,2 Req'd Nutrients 139 30 50 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 16.00 I 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tarrus Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 36 bu. f 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 29 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE -99 10 7 201 1 1 0 0
J128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 21 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract .Field 3899 1,2 Req'd Nutrients 135 40 10 0 .0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 13.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 01 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 35 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 401 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 28 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -95 0 47 20 1 1 01 0
Tract I Field 3929 1 Req'd Nutrients 139 50 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period ' 17.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tarrus Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
RYE Sample Date 36 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 29 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -99 -10 37 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 8900 All Req'd Nutrients 92 10 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 11.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 23 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 18 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -52 30 47 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 8945 1 Req'd Nutrients 135 20 30 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 24.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 35 bu. 06-11-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 28 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -95 20 27 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 9288 1,2 Req'd Nutrients 139 40 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 9.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 36 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 1 29 Ibs/ac. Low I BALANCE -99 0 57 20 1 1 1 0 0
a128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 22 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract I Field 9310 3,5,23 Req'd Nutrients 155 30 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 10.00 1 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Manured, Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Double Crop Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 40 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 411 40 57 ±20
1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 32 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE -115 10 17 11 1 01 0
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.
i128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 23 of 27

'#Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 3 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 10043 1 Req'd Nutrients 119 50 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 11.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 110 bu. 06-11-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 48 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -59 -10 57 201 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 10044 1-2 Req'd Nutrients 123 50 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 22.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
Soil Series Tam Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 114 bu. 06-11-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 50 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -63 -10 57 20 1 1 0 0
Tract I Field 2900 1 Req'd Nutrients 123 60 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 3.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 01 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 114 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 50 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -63 -20 37 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 3086 2,3 Req'd Nutrients 49 70 30 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 18.00 3/15-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Cotton Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 665.lbs. 06-08-12 Manure 29 29 41 151 1 0 0 0
P Removal I Rating 19 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -41 11 15 1 0 0 0
Tract I Field 3097 1 Req'd Nutrients 54 70 30 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 12.00 3/15-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Cotton Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 451 lbs. 06-08-12 Manure 34 34 48 17 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 13 lbs/ac. Low I BALANCE 0 -361 18 17 1 1 0 0
,128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 24 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 3 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (tonslA)
Tract Field 3097 2-3 Req'd Nutrients 49 70 30 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 11.00 3/15-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Cotton Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 665 lbs. 06-08-12 Manure 29 29 41 15 11 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 19 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -41 11 15 1 0 0 0
F
act Field 3117 1-3 Req'd Nutrients 49 40 10 0 0 0 0 0
es App.Period 23.00 3/15-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Cotton Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 201 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date, 665 lbs. 06-08-12 Manure 29 29 41 15 1 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 19 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -11 31 15 1 0 0 0
Tract Field 3228 1,2 Req'd Nutrients *92 10 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 12.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Com,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
RYE I Sample Date 74 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 I 0 0
P Removal Rating 33 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE -32t 30 47 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 3840 1 Req'd Nutrients 129 40 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 16.60 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Com,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 119 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 52 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -69 0 57 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 3846 1-9 Req'd Nutrients 47 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 65.00 3/15-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Cotton Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
RYE I Sample Date 644 Ibs. 1 06-08-12 Manure 27 27 38 14 1 0 0 0
P Removal Raring 19 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 27 18 14 1 0 0 0
-u6128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 25 of 27

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 3 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 3848 12 Req'd Nutrients 123 50 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 9.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tarrus Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 114 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 201 1 1 01 0
P Removal Rating 50 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE -63 -10 37 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 3855 7,9 Req'd Nutrients 123 90 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 18.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Com,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tarrus Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 114 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 50 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE -63 -50 57 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 1 3889 12 Req'd Nutrients *92 30 30 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 18.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 .01 0
RYE I Sample Date 74 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 33 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -32 10 27 201 1 1 0 0
F
ract Field 3897 1,2 Req'd Nutrients 123 30 50 0 0 0 0 0
cres App.Period 16.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tames Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 114 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 50 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE -63 10 7 20 1 1 01 0
Tract Field 3899 1,2 Req'd Nutrients 47 40 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 13.00 3/15-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Cotton Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 01 01 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 644 lbs. 1 06-08-12 Manure 27 27 38 14 1 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 19 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE I 0 -131 18 14 1 0 0 0
6128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 26 of 27

F
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 3 N P20 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 3929 1 Req'd Nutrients 123 50 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App. Period 17.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tarrus Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 114 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 401 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 50 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -63 -10 37 20 1 1 0 0
Tract IField 8900 All Req'd Nutrients *92 10 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 11.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Goldston Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 74 bu. 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 33 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -32 30 47 20 1 1 0 0
Tract I Field 8945 1 Req'd Nutrients 119 20 30 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 24.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual 20 0 01 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 110 bu. 06-11-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 48 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE -59 20 27 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 9288 1,2 Req'd Nutrients 49 40 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 9.00 3/15-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Cotton Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Badin Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 665 lbs. 06-08-12 Manure 29 29 411 15 1 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 19 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -11 41 15 1 0 0 0
Tract Field 9310 3,5,23 Req'd Nutrients 129 30 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 10.00 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 119 bu. 1 06-08-12 Manure 40 40 57 20 1 1 0 0
P Removal I Rating 52 lbs/ac. ILDw I BALANCE 69 101 171 201 1 1 0 0
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.
:,6128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 NMR Page 27 of 27

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate
excessive levels of copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper
can adversely affect plant growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can
be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071,respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85.
By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices,this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample.
Application of lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production .
Reouired Soil Test
Lime Recom.
Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-I Copper Recommendation Zn-1 Zinc Recommendation
10043 l Cotton 6.9 0.0 99 None 125 None
10043 l Wheat,Grain 6.9 0.0 99 None 125 None
10043 1 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.9 0.0 99 None 125 None
10043 1 Corn,Grain 6.9 0.0 99 None 125 None
10044 1-2 Cotton 6.9 0.0 99 None 125 None
10044 1-2 Wheat,Grain 6.9 0.0 99 None 125 None
10044 I-2 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.9 0.0 99 None 125 None
10044 '1-2 Corn,Grain 6.9 0.0 99 1 None 125 None
10083 1-2 Corn,Grain 5.8 0.4 150 None 237 None
10083 1 1-2 Wheat,Grain 5.8 0.0 150 None 237 None
10083 1-2 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 5.8 0.0 150 None 237 None
10083 1-2 Fescue Hay 5.8 0.0 150 None 237 None
10084 5-11 Corn,Grain 5.7 0.5 91 None 179 None
10084 5-11 Wheat,Grain 5.7 0.0 91 None 179 None
10084 5-11 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 5.7 0.0 91 None 179 None
10327 All Fescue Pasture 6.4 0.0 129 None 222 None
11344 1-8 Fescue Hay 6.2 0.0 80 None 110 None
2900 1 Cotton 6.7 0.0 97 None 132 None
2900 1 Wheat,Grain 6.7 0.0 97 None 132 None
2900 1 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.7 0.0 97• None 132 None
2900 1 Corn,Grain 6.7 0.0 97 None 132 None
3086 2,3 Corn,Grain 6.2 0.0 59 None 1 97 None
------------------------------------------ ------------ --------------------=---------------
456128 Database Version 3.4 Date Printed: 0641-2012 STV Page 1 of 5

c uired Soil Test VaLuCS
Lime Recom.
Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-I Copper Recommendation Zn-1 Zinc Recommendation
3086 2,3 Wheat,Grain 6.2 0.0 59 None 97 None
3086 2,3 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.2 0.0 59 None 97 None
3086 2,3 Cotton 6.2 0.0 59 None 97 None
3097 1 Corn,Grain 6.2 0.0 59 None 97 None
3097 1 Wheat,Grain 6.2 0.0 59 None 97 None
3097 1 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.2 0.0 59 None 97 None
3097 1 Cotton 6.2 0.0 59 None 97 None
3097 2-3 jCom,Grain 6.2 0.0 59 None 97 None
3097 2-3 1 Wheat,Grain 6.2 0.0 59 None 97 None
3097 2-3 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.2 0.0 59 None 97 None
3097 2-3 Cotton 6.2 0.0 59 None 97 None
3117 1-3 Corn,Grain 5.6 0.9 52 None 53 None
3117 1-3 Wheat,Grain 5.6 0.0 52 1 None 53 None
3117 1-3 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 5.6 0.0 52 None 53 None
3117 1-3 1 Cotton 5.6 0.0 52 None 53 1 None
3228 1,2 Cotton 6.0 0.5 61 None 56 None
3228 1,2 Wheat,Grain 6-.0 0.0 61 None 56 None
3228 1,2 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.0 0.0 61 None 56 None
3228 1,2 Corn,Grain 6.0 0.0 61 None 56 None
3634 1 jCorn,Grain 6.3 0.0 111 None 183 None
3634 1 Wheat,Grain 6.3 0.0 111 None 183 None
3634 1 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.3 0.0 111 None 183 None
3668 1,2,3 Wheat,Grain 5.3 1.2 123 None 253 None
3668 1,2,3 Corn,Silage 5.3 0.0 123 None 253 None
3670 1-10 1 Wheat,Grain 5.6 0.6 106 None 218 None
3670 1-10 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 5.6 0.0 .106 None 218 None
3670 1-10 Corn,Silage 5.6 0.0 106 None 218 None
3670 11-15 Wheat,Grain 6.4 0.0 137 None 280 None
3670 I1-15 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 1 6.4 1 0.01 137 None 280 1 None
3670 11-15 Corn,Silage 1 6.4 1 0.01 137 1 None 280 1 None
------------------------------------------------
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-11-2012 STV Page 2 of 5

R� d Soil Test Valties
Lime Recom.
Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-1 Copper Recommendation Zn-1 Zinc Recommendation
3673 1-4 Wheat,Grain 5.7 0.6 114 None 277 None
3673 1-4 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 5.7 0.0 114. None 277 None
3673 1-4 Corn,Silage 5.7 0.0 114 None 277 None
3675 1-6 Corn,Grain 5.9 0.0 78 None 101 None
3675 1-6 Wheat,Grain 5.9 0.0 78 None 101 None
3675 1-6 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 5.9 0.0 78 None 101 None
3675 7 Corn,Grain 5.9 0.0 78 1 None 101 None
3675 7 Wheat,Grain 5.9 0.0 78 None Iol None
3675 7 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 5.9 0.0 78 None 101 None
3680 1,2,4,5,6,l Corn,Grain 5.6 0.7 50 None 56 None
3680 1,2,4,5,6,Wheat,Grain 5.6 0.0 50 None 56 None
3680 1,2,4,5,6,Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 5.6 0.0 50 None 56 None
3680 1,2,4,5,6,Fescue Hay 5.6 0.0 50 None 56 None
3682 1 Corn,Grain 5.6 0.6 29 None 108 None
3682 1 l Wheat,Grain 5.6 0.0 29 None 108 None
3682. 1 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 5.6 0.0 29 None I Og I None
3683 1-3 Wheat,Grain 6.0 0.0 37 None 60 None
3683 1-3 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.0 0.0 37 None 60 None
3683 1-3 Corn,Silage 6.0 0.0 37 None 60 None
3684 1-2 Corn,Grain 6.9 0.0 45 None 141 None
3684 1-2 Wheat,Grain 6.9 0.0 45 None 141 None
3684 1-2 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.9 0.0 45 None 141 None
3686 1,2 Wheat,Grain 5.5 0.8 48 None 124 None
3686 1,2 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 5.5 0.0 48 None 124 None
3686 1,2 lCom,Silage 5.5 0.0 48 None 124 None
3840 1 1 Cotton 6.6 0.0 77 None 118 None
3840 1 Wheat,Grain 6.6 0.0 77 None 118 None
3840 1 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.6 0.0 77 None 118 None
3840 1 Corn,Grain 6.6 0.0 77 None 1 118 None
3846 1-9 Corn,Grain 1 5.7 1 0.5 1 68 None 69 None
-------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-11-2012 STV Page 3 of 5

Rea uired Soil Test Values
Lime Recom.
Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-1 Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation
3846 1-9 Wheat,Grain 5.7 0.0 68 None 69 None
3846 1-9 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 5.7 0.0 68 None 69 None
3846 1-9 Cotton 5.7 1 0.0 68 None 69 None
3848 12 Cotton 5.7 0.8 76 None 85 None
3848 12 Wheat,Grain 5.7 0.0 76 None 85 None
3848 12 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 5.7 0.0 76 None 85 None
3848 12 Corn,Grain 5.7 0.0 76 None 85 None
3855 7,9 Cotton I 1 0.0 72 None 84 None
3855 7,9 Wheat,Grain 6.6 0.0 72 None 84 None
3855 7,9 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.6 0.0 72 None 84 None
3855 7,9 Corn,Grain 6.6 0.0 72 None 84 None
3889 1,2 Cotton 6.3 0.0 68 one 86 None
3889 1,2 Wheat,Grain 6.3 0.0 68 None 86 None
3889 1,2 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.3 0.0 68 None 86 None
3889 1,2 Corn,Grain 6.3 0.0 68 None 86 None
3897 1,2 Cotton 6.7 0.0 116 None 82 None
3897 1,2 Wheat,Grain 6.7 0.0 116 None 82 None
3897 1,2 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.7 0.0 116 None 82 None
3897 1,2 Corn,Grain 6.7 0.0 116 None 82 None
3899 1,2 Corn,Grain 6.4 0.0 122 None 86 None
3899 1,2 Wheat,Grain 6.4 0.0 122 None 86 None
3899 1,2 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.4 0.0 122 None 86 None
3899 1,2 Cotton 6.4 0.0 122 None 86 None
3929 1 Cotton 5.6 1.2 40 None 78 None
3929 1 Wheat,Grain 5.6 0.0 40 None 78 None
3929 1 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 5.6 0.0 40 None 78 None
3929 1 Corn,Grain 5.6 0.0 40 None 78 None
8900 All Cotton 6.0 0.5 61 None 56 None
8900 All Wheat,Grain 6.0 0.0 61 None 56 None
8900 All Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.0 0.0 61 None 56 None
- -------
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-11-2012 STV Page 4 of 5

R ied SoilValues
l
Lime Recom.
Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-1 Copper Recommendation Zn-1 Zinc Recommendation
8900 All Corn,Grain 6.0 0.0 61 None 56 None
8901 1-3 Cotton 7.1 0.0 65 None 54 None
8901 1-3 Corn,Grain 7.1 0.0 65 None 54 None
8901 1-3 Wheat,Grain 7.1 0.0 65 None 54 None
8901 1-3 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 7.1 0.0 65 None 54 None
8945 1 Cotton 6.7 0.0 113 None 227 None
8945 1 Wheat,Grain 6.7 0.0 113 None 227 None
8945 1 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.7 0.0 113 None 227 None
8945 1 Corn,Grain 6.7 0.0 113 None 227 None
9288 1,2 Corn,Grain 6.6 0.0 77 None 118 None
9288 1,2 Wheat,Grain 6.6 0.0 77 None H 8 None
9288 1,2 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.6 0.0 77 None 118 None
9288 1,2 1 Cotton 6.6 0.0 77 None 118 None
9310 3,5,23 Cotton 6.2 0.0 97 None 129 None
9310 3,5,23 Wheat,Grain 6.2 0.0 97 None 129 None
9310 3,5,23 Soybeans,Manured,Double Crop 6.2 0.0 97 None 129 None
9310 3,5,23 Corn,Grain 6.2 0.0 97 None 129 None
- ------------- ------------------------------------ --------------------
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-11-2012 STV Page 5 of_5

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity,this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available.Waste St rya-.!e Capacity
Source Name I Storage Pond Design Storage Capacity(Days)
Start Date 12/01 120
Plan Year Month Available Storage Capacity(Days)
1 1 89
1 2 61
1 3 120
1 4 120
1 5 120
1 6 120
1 7 110
1 8 120
1 9 113
1 10 120
1 11 90
1 12 59
2 1 28
2 2 0
2 3 i20
2 4 117
2 5 120
2 6 90
2 7 80
2 8 71
2 9 120
2 10 120
2 11 90
2 12 59
3 f 1 31
3 2 23
--------- ------------------------------
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-11-2012 Capacity Page 1 of 2

Available Waste Storage Ca acit
Source Name I Storage Pond Design Storage Capacity(Days)
Start Date 12/01 120
Plan Year Month Available Storage Capacity(Days)
3 3 120
3 4 90
3 5 59
3 6 29
3 7 19
3 8 120
3 9 113
3 10 120
3 11 90
3 12 59
4 1 28
4 2 0
4 3 -7
4 4 -10
4 5 120
4 - 6 90
4 7 80
4 8 120
4 9 113
4 10 120
4 11 90
4 12 59
*Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-11-2012 Capacity Page 2 of 2

Required Specifications For Animal Waste ManaLement
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,_
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5.tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, MRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by dishing after waste
application.Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 Specification Page 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift'from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
.be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied,closer than 10.0 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over-spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways,waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. ]Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops.for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre-plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:6/11/2012 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate-determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste'to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5)years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/11/2012 Specification Page 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 7
Corn Piedmont
In the Piedmont, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.Plant 1-2" deep.Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted.Increase the seeding rate by 10%when
planting no-till.Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool,wet soil,banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants. An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and the remaining N behind the planter. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type.When
including a starter in the fertilizer program,the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus
is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn
production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 1,2, 1,2,4,5,6„ 12, 1-2, 1-3, 1-6, 1-9,2,3, 2-3, 3,5,23, 5-11,
7,9
Corn Piedmont
In the Piedmont, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.Plant 1-2" deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10%when
planting no-till.Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting. When planting early in cool,wet soil,banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants.An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-301bs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and the remaining N behind the planter.The total amount of N is dependent on soil type.When
including a starter in the fertilizer program, the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus
is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the corn.Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn
production.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
45612s Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-11-2012 Crop Note Page 1 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 1,2, 1-3,All
Corn Piedmont
In the Piedmont, corn is normally planted when soil temperatures reach 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit.
Review the Official Variety"green book"and information from private companies to select a high
yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Plant 1-2"deep. Plant
populations should be determined by the hybrid being planted. Increase the seeding rate by 10%when
planting no-till.Phosphorus and potassium recommended by a soil test can be broadcast or banded at
planting.When planting early in cool, wet soil,banded phosphorus will be more available to the young
plants.An accepted practice is to apply 20-30 lbs/acre N and 20-30 lbs/acre phosphorus banded as a
starter and the remaining N behind the planter. The total amount of N is dependent on soil type. When
including a starter in the fertilizer program,the recommended potassium and any additional phosphorus
is normally broadcast at planting. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects are essential for corn
production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 1,2, 12, 1-2, 1-3, 1-9,2,3, 2-3, 3,5,23, 7,9
Cotton Piedmont
In the Piedmont,cotton is normally planted from April 15-May 5 when warm(above 65 F) temperatures
and dry weather are present and predicted to remain for at least 5 to 7 days after planting.Avoid planting
after May 20 if at all possible.Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book"and information from
private companies to select a high yielding variety with characteristics needed for your area and
conditions. Plant 4-6 seed/row foot at a depth of 1/2-1". Adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus
and potash recommended from a soil test can be broadcast or banded at planting.When planting early in
cool, wet soils,banded phosphorus will be more available to the young plants.Apply 20-25 lbs/acre N as
a starter and the remaining recommended N as a sidedress application 2 to 3 weeks after first square.An
option is to apply the 20-25 lbs/acre N as a starter and the remainder of the total N behind the planter.
When cotton is drilled(UNR) all the N is broadcast before planting. The total N needed is dependent on
soil type.Apply 1.0 lb/acre actual boron either at planting or at sidedress; or,foliar apply 1/2 lb/acre
actual boron with 1/4 lb/acre applied at early bloom and the other 1/4 lb/acre about 2 weeks later. The
boron needs to be available to the cotton during fruiting.Tissue samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the cotton.Timely management of insects, weeds,and
excessive vegetative growth are essential for profitable cotton production.
------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-11-2012 Crop Note Page 2 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 1,2, 1-3,All
Cotton Piedmont
In the Piedmont,cotton is normally planted from April 15-May 5 when warm(above 65 F)temperatures
and dry weather are present and predicted to remain for at least 5 to 7 days after planting.Avoid planting
after May 20 if at all possible.Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from
private companies to select a high yielding variety with characteristics needed for your area and
conditions.Plant 4-6 seed/row foot at a depth of 1/2-1". Adequate depth control is essential.Phosphorus
and potash recommended from a soil test can be broadcast or banded at planting. When planting early in
cool,wet soils,banded phosphorus will be more available to the young plants. Apply 20-25 lbs/acre N as
a starter and the remaining recommended N as a sidedress application 2 to 3 weeks after first square.An
option is to apply the 20-25 lbs/acre N as a starter and the remainder of the total N behind the planter.
When cotton is drilled(UNR)all the N is broadcast before planting. The total N needed is dependent on
soil type. Apply 1.0 lb/acre actual boron either at planting or at sidedress; or, foliar apply 1/2 lb/acre
actual boron with 1/4 lb/acre applied at early bloom and the other 1/4 lb/acre about 2 weeks later. The
boron needs to be available to the cotton during fruiting.Tissue samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the cotton. Timely management of insects, weeds, and
excessive vegetative growth are essential for profitable cotton production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): All
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best)and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 201b/ac. seed.Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25"in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations.Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques.Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac.N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25%for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30,with equal amounts in each window.Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
--------------- ------ - ----- --
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-11-2012 Crop Note Page 3 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 11-15
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont,corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs.nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting.Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
com is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage.Tropical com for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the com.Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production.Plant a cover crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1,2, 1,2,3, 1-10, 1-3, 1-4
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont,com should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage.Tropical com for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter.as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable com silage production.Plant a cover crop after harvest.
----------------------- ----------------------- ---
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-11-2012 Crop Note Page 4 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 11-15,7
Wheat: Piedmont
In the Piedmont,wheat should be planted from October 10-November 3.Plant 22 seed/drill row foot at
1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5%for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum
time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU"Small
Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10%when planting no-till.
Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green
book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics
needed for your area and conditions.Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Increase the N at
planting to 40 lbs/acre in no-till wheat. Apply phosphorus and potash according to soil test
recommendations at this time.The remaining N should be applied during the months of February-March.
The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to
monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential
for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 1,2, 1,2,3, 1,2,4,5,6„ 1-10, 12, 1-2, 1-3, 1-4, 1-6, 1-9,2,3,
2-3, 3,5,23, 5-11, 7,9
Wheat: Piedmont
In the Piedmont,wheat should be planted from October 10-November 3.Plant 22 seed/drill row foot at
1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5%for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum
time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU"Small
Grain Production Guide". Also,increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10%when planting no-till.
Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential.Review the NCSU Official Variety"green
book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics
needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 301bs/acre N at planting. Increase the N at
planting to 40 lbs/acre in no-till wheat. Apply phosphorus and potash according to soil test
recommendations at this time.The remaining N should be applied during the months of February-March.
The total N is dependent on the soil type.Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to
monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential
for profitable wheat production.
------- ------------- -------------------------- --
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-11-2012 Crop Note Page 5 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 1,2, 1-3,All
Wheat: Piedmont
In the Piedmont,wheat should be planted from October 10-November 3. Plant 22 seed/drill row foot at
1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5%for each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum
time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU"Small
Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10%when planting no-till.
Adequate depth control when planting the wheat is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green
book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics
needed for your area and conditions.Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Increase the N at
planting to 40 lbs/acre in no-till wheat. Apply phosphorus and potash according to soil test
recommendations at this time.The remaining N should be applied during the months of February-March.
The total N is dependent on the soil type. Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to
monitor the nutrient status of the wheat. Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential
for profitable wheat production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1,2,4,5,6„ 1-2
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar.20.For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed.Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass.Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25"in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations.Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques.Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac.N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25%to 50%for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30,with equal amounts in each window.Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1-8
Fescue:Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug.20 to Oct. 10 (best)and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed.Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass.Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25"in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations.Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques.Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac.N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25%to 50%for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30,with equal amounts in each window.Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
---------------------------------------- -
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-11-2012 Crop Note Page 6 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 11-15, 7
Double-Crop Soybeans,Piedmont
Double-crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no-tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it.is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations.Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8"drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15" rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
1/2"and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen.However,applications of 20-301bs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor.Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 1,2, 1,2,3, 1,2,4,5,6„ 1-10, 12; 1-2, 1-3, 1-4, 1-6, 1-9, 2,3,
2-3, 3,5,23, 5-11, 7,9
Double-Crop Soybeans,Piedmont
Double-crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no-tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations.Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15"rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen.However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor.Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 1,2, 1-3, All
Double-Crop Soybeans,Piedmont
Double-crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no-tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations.Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15"rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen.However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor.Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans.Timely management of weeds and insects is.essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
----------------------------------------------------------- ------ --
456128 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-11-2012 Crop Note Page 7 of 7

USDA United States
�--- Departmental Stanly County, North Carolina Farm 8177
Agriculture
Tract 12561
tr sta^'y 2018 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
1 4.64 UHEL Noncropland
I _ 9 44.15 UHEL Noncropland
12 1.73 NHEL
13 1.03 NHEL
T f 14 3.22 NHEL
` 19 25.79 HEL
' +r 23 22 4.72 HEL
Sri 23 1.29 HEL
�l.
0.21 UHEL Noncro:::land
Page Cropland Total: 37.78 acres
r .
J F�
l ..•
22 !'-
Anson i'
14
Map Created October 23,2017
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
_ Non-Cropland
14 y-.Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
H 8 Restricted Use
' 0380 76Q 0 Limited Restrictions
19
w e — 0 _••- Exempt from Conservation
Feet Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represents legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'a<is'and assumes all risks associated with its use..The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no respnnsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifie4 iot represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original detemi' (CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

_USDA United States
Department of Stanly County, North Carolina Farm 6907
Agriculture
Stanly Tract 11344
2018 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
1 2.56 UHEL
2 0.83 UHEL
3 2.0 UHEL
4 7.03 UHEL
8 16.14 HE
1 9 10.9 1 UHEL I Noncropland
15 129.49 1 UHEL I Noncrooland
Page Cropland Total: 18.56 acres
d
15
9
4
• ? Map Created October 23,2017
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
.$ ��`� ` L'�' Cropland
=-•.* Non-Cropland
C3Tract Boundary
r. r `
�"7 Wetland Determination Identifiers
4 Restricted Use
" 0 175 350 700 7 Limited Restrictions
we Exempt from Conservation
s Feet - Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the Information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibilityfor actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any.user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifie!�` ' 'not represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Referto your original determ;' (CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States Farm 8178
Department of Agriculture Stanly County, North Carolina
Tract 12560
2018 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
2 2.05 HEL
4 5.85 HEL
7 3.06 HEL
8 63.34 UHEL Noncropland
14 43.03 UHEL Noncro land
- 17 1.35 NHEL
21 16.23 HEL
24 7.17 HEL
8 25 6.68 NHEL
26 0.92 HEL
' 28 1.16 NHEL
Page Cropland Total: 44.47 acres
17
4. Y 'stant
� 4 x
O�`
1
24 i Anson
i
Map Created March 30,2018
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
q' Common Land Unit
25 Cropland
Non-Cropland
LiTract Boundary
- Wetland Determination Identifiers
Restricted Use
` •360 720 1,440 V Limited Restrictions
w :l Exempt from Conservation
'1^r` Feet, Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identified -iot represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determ'. i(CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States
Depa- 112
Agriculturet°' Stanly County, North Carolina Farm 4
Tract 931310
` V " _ 2019 Program Year
ap "� CLU Acres HEL Crop
3 6.42 HEL
-1
1 5 0.82 HEL
• '� 19 0.32 UHEL Noncro land
y *� 20 3.74 UHEL Noncropland
*• *' 23 4.82 HEL
25 0.02 UHEL I Noncropland
Page Cropland Total: 12.06 acres
3 ti
r 5
dF
1P
Stan
O '
�r 23 - '
. � f
o
e
Map Created March 26,2019
Base Image Layer flown in 2018
Common Land Unit
Cropland
' f Non-Cropland
•, Tract Boundary
T Wetland Determination Identifiers
H ; * @ Restricted Use
11 0 175 350 700 0 Limited Restrictions
ws _ Exempt from Conservation
a F Uet Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP Imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as Wand assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identirie�,' lot represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Refer to your orig inal determ" 1(CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS. "

USDA United States
Department of Stanly County, North Carolina Farm 933
Agriculture
Tract 3840
�d Stan ly � (� I.
, 2018 Program Year
. ` f _ '' fir' rs ,
,� ��, i .w r� ' ,�� +} '�+' -r . ; ..`�: CLU Acres HEL Crop
.p4 + ��� �:. � a . 1 16.65 HEL
,. 3 0.16 UHEL Noncropland
4+ ._� � .* `r1 ' +l �, �.. � � !` • r+� j - 6 0.41 UHEL Noncro land
Page Cropland Total: 16.65 acres
.► 7f
F
i!i "t ii �• 'ry
"A
Map Created October 23,2017
i Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non-Cropland
! Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
9 Restricted Use
I+ -
0 175 350 700 0 Limited Restrictions
�� ■ Exempt from Conservation
� y
Feet F Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer andlor the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifies sot represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Referto your original detemti' ',(CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS. ',

USDA United States Farm 4087
y- Department of Agriculture Stanly County, North Carolina
Tract 9288
2019 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
2 7.21 HEL
7 0.63 UHEL Noncropland
11 7.28 UHEL Noncro land
- Page Cropland Total: 7.21 acres
•f
,L
i 7 Y
2
' Ar
ti
Map Created March 26,2019
Base Image Layer flown in 2018
• Y
Common Land Unit
s� Cropland
Non-Cropland
' 'Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
t r Restricted Use
•� �' 0 Limited Restrictions
W , *- ' ■ 175 3,0 Exempt from Conservation
e :; i A• Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as Wand assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identffleg'_''not represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Referto your original determr°' (CPA-026 and attached maps)forexact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

U S DA United States
r--� Department of Stanly County, North Carolina Farm 6800
Agriculture
Tract 10083
2018 Program Year
.- N
CLU Acres HEL Crop
8 3.8 HEL
10 10.92 UHEL
li �, +, - - 11 0.3 UHEL Noncro land
8 « 12 1.19 UHEL Noncropland
{'" 'r `'• r _ 13 8.66 UHEL Noncro land
Page Cropland Total: 14.72 acres
. 1p; n
r
- - Stanly
ir
11
ti
s
Map Created October 23,2017
13 - Base Image Layer flown.in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non-Cropland
Tract Boundary
Anson y Wetland Determination Identifiers
10 Restricted Use
�{ 0 Limited Restrictions
0 175 350 �� _ Exempt from Conservation
Feet Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'a=_-is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no resppry ibility,for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifie} iot represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Referto your original determ! (CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States
r^ Department of Stanly County, North Carolina Farm 6800
Agriculture
Tract 10084
2018 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
1 9.39 UHEL Noncro land
2 0.15 UHEL Noncropland
5 9.02 HEL
11 2.06 UHEL
Page Cropland Total: 11.08 acres
5
R¢
OWNr
f 4t
Stan ly �.•
IF
1
4
Map Created October 23,2017
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
♦ �: Non-Cropland
fr
L Tract Boundary
? Wetland Determination Identifiers
-& Restricted Use
N
185 370 740 V Limited Restrictions
Ai4ann Exempt from Conservation
4 Feet Compliance Provisions
h
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifier'—I iot represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Referto your original determi, " (CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States
DepartmenAgriculture Stanly County, North Carolina Farm 6924
Tract 10327
2018 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
5 5.12 UHEL
6 4.28 UHEL
r 7 4.31 UHEL
8 1.3 NHEL
'; 16 1.44 UHEL
I •'• 21 0.06 UHEL Noncropland
r i
r 31 17.87 1 UHEL j Noncro land
Page Cropland Total: 16.45 acres
16
5
q *_
a .,r. Stan
ill'
t
7
6
�* Map Created October 23,2017
qqk I ..
_ Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
AP_
Cropland
Non-Cropland
Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
cji Restricted Use
0 175 35.0 700 0 Limited Restrictions
an �+ Exempt from Conservation
q FgB# Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the Information provided directly from the producerand/or the NAIP Imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside`FSA Programs.
Wetland identifier, got represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Referto your original determir' -,(CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States
Department of Stanly County, North Carolina Farm 6907
Agriculture
Tract 11344
Stanly
2018 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
1 2.56 UHEL
2 0.83 UHEL
3 2.0 UHEL
4 7.03 UHEL
8 6.14 HEL
1 9 0.9 UHEL Noncropland
15 29.49 UHEL Noncro p land
Page Cropland Total: 18.56 acres
3
ks
f - Map Created October 23,2017
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
' - Common Land Unit
_ $ � � �• Cropland
J Non-Cropland
=Tract Boundary
yr �' Wetland Determination Identifiers
Restricted Use
Q 175 350 700 0 Limited Restrictions
T Exempt from Conservation
Feet Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as.is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no respon_sibillty for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside;FSA Programs.
Wetland identifier," --rot represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Referto your original determir (CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States
Department of Anson County, North Carolina Farm 2293
Agriculture
Tract 10043
2019 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL I Crop
1 11.2 HEL
2 0.2 HEL
3 0.42 UHEL Noncro land
+ 4 25.35 UHEL Noncropland
Page Cropland Total: 11.4 acres
4
Anson
Map Created November 06,2018
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
_ Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non-Cropland
t Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
Restricted Use
0 1�5 350 700 0 Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
Feet Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'a_s i_s'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any users reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifier`" of represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determi� w (CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS. j

USDA United States Farm 2294
�^ Department of Anson County North Carolina
Agriculture r
Tract 10044
2019 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
1 13.6 HEL
2 18.5 HEL
�.�..
3 2.85 UHEL Noncro land
� 4 0.38 UHEL Noncropland
_ 5 10.53 1 UHEL Noncro land
Page Cropland Total: 22.1 acres
WOO.
a~�
1 _4
Anson
2
s
Map Created November 06,2018
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
_ Common Land Unit
Cropland
• Non-Cropland
:r =Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
_ f Restricted Use
Limited Restrictions
0 175 350 700
we Exempt from Conservation
JEONkNEW Feet Compliance Provisions
e
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifier,.—rot represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determir' -`'(CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States Farm 3044
DepartmenAgrcutuetof Stanly County, North Carolina
StAty Tract 3086
2019 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
2 16.06 HEL
6 4.39 UHEL Noncropland
7 38.76 HEL Noncro land
Page Cropland Total: 16.06 acres
µ ' A
L
i J
E
a,
Map Created October 24,2018
`= Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
. F Cropland
Non-Cropland
s i Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
Restricted Use
' $ Q 0 Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
_•=Y FBBi Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agen cy assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outsir_iP FSA Programs.
Wetland identifier"' of represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determir (CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDAUnited States
Departme009
Agriculture
f Stanly County, North Carolina Farm 1
Stanly Tract 3682
2018 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
1 2.25 HEL
2 3.98 HEL
3 4.96 1 UHEL Noncrouland
` Page Cropland Total: 6.23 acres
1
{ 4W 4�
+ I
q Map Created October 23,2017
_ . .*. Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
_ Cropland
Non-Cropland
+ r . . !Tract Boundary
e
Wetland Determination Identifiers
* Restricted Use
" 0 Limited Restrictions
r. e �� 35Q i0� Exempt from Conservation
Feet Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outsid_e,FSA Programs.
Wetland identifier' ',ot represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Referto your original determir.' "(CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States Farm 3044
Department of Agriculture Stanly County, North Carolina
-
Tract 3097
stain ly
_. 2018 Program Year
Y
err, CLU Acres HEL Crop
1 12.68 HEL
. r 4 54.59 UHEL Noncropland
5 11.75 HEL
Page Cropland Total: 24.43 acres
If - ..
■ r ` - r
1
t r
{ • Map Created April 03,2018
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
%4
Cropland
a Or Non-Cropland
k Tract Boundary
qO '
lipWetland Determination Identifiers
Restricted Use
0 Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
Peet Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outsidP,FSA Programs.
Wetland Identifier;" *)t represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determir "'CPA and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States
-r Department of Stanly County, North Carolina Farm 1062
Agriculture
Tract 3683
Stan ly
2018 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
1 1.2 HEL
2 4.73 HEL
3 25.87 HEL
4 0.39 UHEL Noncropland
5 148.27 1 UHEL 1 Noncrooland
Page Cropland Total: 31.8 acres
'r
r
I
r
- 1
�1
I ti 3
4
2. Map Created October 23,2017
' Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
� = Non-Cropland
Tract Boundary
�+ Wetland Determination Identifiers
Restricted Use
'++ 0 1750 700 0 Limited Restrictions
we } Exempt from Conservation
'�. kEMML==AMMMAMMMi Feet Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside_FSA Programs.
Wetland identifier;," ',ot represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Referto your original detennin_`"CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States
�— Department of Stanly County, North Carolina Farm 5229
Agriculture
Tract 3684
stan l
..�: �. 2018 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
_ 1 3.3 HEL
2 27.3 HEL
�' �` + ,• c +� ;4, 9 28.43 UHEL Noncro land
a ter} 10 16.81 UHEL Noncropland
Page Cropland Total: 30.6 acres
r
,I
f,
7
Map Created October 23,2017
Base Image Layerflown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non-Cropland
Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
0 Restricted Use
N 0 230 460 920 0 Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
a Feet Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as Wand assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identlfiersr,,"^ot represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Referto your original determine"' "°CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

_USDA United States
Department of Stanly County, North Carolina Farm 2713
Agriculture
Tract 2900
Stanly
2018 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
1 3.08 HEL
3 4.08 UHEL Noncropland
Page Cropland Total: 3.08 acres
S
• l
3 M
Map Created October 23,2017
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non-Cropland
r L liTract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
n
* Restricted Use
A (} 0 Limited Restrictions
w� }e 175 350 7QQ Exempt from Conservation
11��' feet Compliance Provisions
S
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifier-,,' —of represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Referto your original determin'- "CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States
�^ Department of Stanly County, North Carolina Farm 1078
Agriculture
Tract 3686
Stanly 2018 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
1 5.18 HEL
4 [ 2 3.04 HEL
e 3 19.19 UHEL Noncrocland
- y � Page Cropland Total: 8.22 acres
� 5
e
y ..
Map Created October 23,2017
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
_ Non-Cropland
Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
0 Restricted Use
0 175 350 700 0 Limited Restrictions
w Exempt from Conservation
T Feet Compliance Provisions
G
USDA FSA maps are far FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producerandlorthe NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifiers{' '-ot represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Referto your original detenninr l ''(CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States
Agriculture Farm 968
Department of Stanly County, North Carolina icu
Tract 3846
'! 2018 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
•# A 2 4.32 HEL
,: �• _, �'.:: �_ �'� '� 5 23.59 HEL
t ` % `j' ,r"+�� r t f'.• }`f� 6 12.34 HEL
t +�
8 0.53 UHEL Noncropland
F • '� 9 0.75 HEL
'r3 10 6.16 UHEL Noncropland
11 6.73 HEL
42 12 15.22 UHEL Noncropland
5� '� ; R Page Cropland Total: 47.73 acres
12
2
6 .r
Stanly
1 / ,6
�f
— l Map Created March 19, 2018
e x Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non-Cropland
t 7ract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
Restricted Use
w � 0 187.5 375 750 7 Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
g Feet — 'Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with Its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any users reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifie!'-" not represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determ�'— l(CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States Farm 1039
�— Department of' Stanly County, North Carolina� Agriculture Tract 3848
Stan ly _
'► ��� _ +�, 2018 Program Year
• •�. .'�+ ! • r _ + ► ,. ►' CLU Acres HEL Crop
.y y.. f• _
,, .' .,w ,, r „ '7 �. •���,� � � 5 0.71 UHEL -Noncropland
1 t)r } ' •.� 8 0.02 UHEL Noncropland
10 5.39 UHEL Noncropland
tir s
r, •_' ' � 12 9.41 HEL
Page Cropland Total: 9.41 acres
., Ar
� . . � ,
• ti
e
44
4 r
v � t
t '
Map Created October 23,2017
r �49 �' �� =
Base Image Layerflown in 2016
4 %' ■ #� + r } common Land Unit
'� i ,• Cropland
Non-Cropland
• 4 4- ^ ti '�� w ■ �': ®Tract Boundary
+ �' ■cam - q - Wetland Determination Identifiers
fo Restricted Use
" Limited Restrictions
E75 350 �0 Exempt from Conservation
F Feet Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal surveyor reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifier'"-"•not represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determi,— �,(CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States
—r Department of Stanly County, North Carolina Farm 786
Agriculture
Tract 3855
Stanly
2018 Program Year
s CLU Acres HEL Crop
_ 2 18.6 HEL
` �,• it '�i 121107. UHEL Noncropland
r " Page Cropland Total: 18.6 acres
J. 'r�.r, J ��sue{ 4 �►' .
- Y
Map Created October 23,2017
l Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
_ Cropland
Non-Cropland
i Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
4r it Restricted Use
0 230 460 920 0 Limited Restrictions
w• e - .� �`' Exempt from Conservation
s Fee} Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal surveyor reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifie%'—not represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Referto your original determl," —�(CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States
Department of Stanly County, North Carolina Farm 8115
Agriculture-
Tract 3889
A 2018 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
3 10.39 HEL
s 4 3.71 HEL
*� 7 43.16 UHEL Noncronland
Page Cropland Total: 14.1 acres
Old
,i
4
_rjr
s� y-
7
_ r Map Created October 23,2017
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
f j Common Land Unit
i Cropland
- } Non-Cropland
=Tract Boundary Wetland Determination Identifiers
* Restricted Use
,y 4 1T5fr0 700 0 Limited Restrictions
we - Exempt from Conservation
6 Feef, Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal surveyor reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifigs" ' not represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Referto your original determi (CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States Farm 7854
�- Department of Agriculture Stanly County, North Carolina
Tract 3680
I
2017 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
■ 4 1 9.48 HEL
r.
C�-- 2 0.82 HEL
4 1 ,_'` '
-�. a 4 1.05 HEL
agar r 6: ,' 5 10.37 HEL
V. F 6 1.86 H E L
7 2.14 NHEL
_ 8 16.95 HEL
2 9 110.82 UHEL Noncropland
z 12 12.34 UHEL Noncro land
Page Cropland Total: 42.67 acres
. s
{. Map Created December 30,2016
„ Base Image Layer flown in 2016
�s
Common Land Unit
' Cropland
Non-Cropland
- — - } =Tract Boundary
t Wetland Determination Identifiers
* Restricted Use
N r 7 Limited Restrictions
-wE. - _ - - 7�a Exempt from Conservation
MOOkElOW Feet Compliance Provisions
s _
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program ad ministration only. This map does not represent a legal surveyor reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the Information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as_s'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identified not represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Referto your original determ;'. T,(CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

LJ'UA United States
Department of Agriculture Stanly County, North Carolina Farm 1028
- Tract 3897
2018 Program Year
;•h
CLU Acres I HEL Crop
1 12.04 �Noncro
r.
2 4.84
3 38.68
Page Cropland Total: 16.88 acres
• '�f �t 1
Map Created October 23,2017
Base Image Layerflown in 2016
f, Common Land Unit
• Cropland
Non-Cropland
-Tract Boundary
` Wetland Determination Identifiers
a �& Restricted Use
we
AnsonO - 175 350 00 V Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
00 Fe Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey orreflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identificr.1— 'not represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determi"`',(CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS. "

USDA United States Farm 879
Departments Agriculture Stanly County, North Carolina
Tract 3675
2017 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
1 2.8 HEL
2 1.48 HEL
3 3.57 NHEL
4 1.77 HEL
`i 6 5 1.1 HEL
6 2.01 HEL
7 2.59 HEL
8 74.48 UHEL Noncropland
Page Cropland Total: 15.32 acres
L
2
4 l-
' Ali
S
Map Created December 30,2016
Base Image Layerflown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non-Cropland
QTract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
0 Restricted Use
A" 0 Limited Restrictions
wd E 0 180 3B0 � � a Exempt from Conservation
� —IMEIWNEW Feet Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal surveyor reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP Imagery. The producer
accepts the data'a=_is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifle( not represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determr' ',(CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States Farm 6924
Agriculture
--�---• Department of Stanly County, North Carolina
Tract 3673
2017 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
7 21.14 HEL
_+ "t 11 32.45 UHEL Noncropland
16 0.3 UHEL Noncropland
33 �1_47UHEL Noncropland
37 UHEL Noncropland
Page Cropland Total: 21.14 acres
Aga
E �
I�99
t_6
M.
Map Created December 30,2016
All Base Image Layer flown in 2016
r
• Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non-Cropland
Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
Restricted Use
w 0 Limited Restrictions
+ � d 175 35D 700 Exempt from Conservation
n Feet.; Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represents legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifies, "hot represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original deter! (CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States
Department of Stanly County, North Carolina Farm 4668
Agriculture
Tract 8945
2019 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
2 23.29 1 HE
7 7.15 1 UHEL Noncropland
Page Cropland Total: 23.29 acres
Montgomery
-40 ,1
•
2 <:
%W 11� R .
Map Created March 26,2019
AF
Base Image Layer flown in 2018
ti .
•-. • g'' �; _ ,, •:.�; . Common Land Unit
�■ 1`=� ,� S. Cropland
. r * ! r Non-Cropland
Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
Restricted Use
" p Limited Restrictions
i
w-e .n��F 700 Exempt from Conservation
F t Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the Information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as_is'and assumes all risks associated with Its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland Identifier ' not represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Referto your original determ"` "i(CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States
Department of Stanly County, North Carolina Farm 1068
Agriculture
Tract 3929
2019 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
1 17.17 1 HE
2 0.05 UHEL Noncropland
4 1.54 UHEL Noncro land
Page Cropland Total: 17.17 acres
w I
.A
yr _
�'- -. _ err �+s: ■-
` P stanly
5--
r-
�.a+r
Map Created March 26,2019
r Base Image Layer flown in 2018
PI Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non-Cropland
i lTract Boundary
' Wetland Determination Identifiers
' Restricted Use
" •L' f .A 0 Limited Restrictions
0_ 175 356 700
Exempt from Conservation
a Feet Compliance Provisions
_ _ Y
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal surveyor reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP Imagery. The producer
accepts the data'aF__Wand assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any users reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identified" not represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determ' i(CPA-026 and attached maps)forexact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States
Department of Stanly County, North Carolina Farm 1036
Agriculture
Tract 3899
OA=•r,� �`
2019 Program Year
a
CLU Acres HEL Crop
' 1 18.32 UHEL Noncro land
2 12.6 HEL
Page Cropland Total: 12.6 acres
9
i
W
2
+ 11
1
�' ice`*?•• Map Created March 26,2019
Base Image Layer flown in 2018
Common Land Unit
a a '� ' Cropland
Non-Cropland
,. x ®Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
N + 0 Restricted Use
- { 0 Limited Restrictions
" E 700 Exempt from Conservation
a ' Fee ® Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal surveyor reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as`Is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any users reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland Identifie"� not represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Referto your original determ{" '-i(CPA-026 and attached maps)forexact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States
=r— Department of Farm 8188
Agriculture Stanly County, North Carolina
_ Tract 12569
��. 2018 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
_ - ,�•Y 5 2.16 HEL
6 2.88 HEL
8 7.54 NHEL
` 10 10.73 UHEL Noncropland
14 2.71 UHEL Noncro;land
Page Cropland Total: 12.58 acres
-4; 4 L w
r
kv
wow-
a
Map Created October 23,2017
Base Image Layer flown In 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non-Cropland
s _ _ Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
Restricted Use
w
-loop �'o 175 350 706 0 Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
eeE ' Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal surveyor reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producerand/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'a-_is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no respnn__sibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identiWl lot represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original detenml' (CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USi_)A United States
�-- Department of Agriculture Stanly County, North Carolina Farm 8187
-
Staniyj Tract 12570
_ 2018 Program Year
,, ''t- ' �•: •} CLU Acres HEL Crop
.,7
4 7.35 HEL
7 4.77 NHEL
f1'' �'. ■ 11 15.0 UHEL Noncro land
15 0.23 1 UHEL Noncropland
16
16 0.02 1 UHEL Noncro land
*AW4" Page Cropland Total: 12.12 acres
pro
R V��
� ��,�-,_ �� x- �•� .ter � r
6
7 ow
. Map Created October 23,2017
Base Image Layerflown in 2016
- -- Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non-Cropland
Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
4 Restricted Use
NEEkNEW
D 175 50 700 V Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
Feet Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as Wand assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage Incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifie,,3 `iot represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Referto your original determV (CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

590- 1
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
(Ac.)
CODE 590
irrigation water.
DEFINITION Enhanced efficiency fertilizers, used in the state
Managing the amount(rate), source, placement must be defined by the Association of American
(method of application), and timing of plant Plant Food Control Officials(AAPFCO)and be
nutrients and soil amendments. accepted for use by NCSU and NCDA experts
with responsibility for verification of product
PURPOSE guarantees, ingredients(by AAPFCO definition)
and label claims.
• To budget, supply, and conserve nutrients
for plant production. To avoid salt damage, the rate and placement of
• To minimize agricultural nonpoint source applied nitrogen and potassium in starter
pollution of surface and groundwater fertilizer must be consistent with NCSU/NCDA&
resources. CS guidelines, or industry practice recognized
by NCSU/NCDA&CS specialists.
• To properly utilize manure or organic by-
products as a plant nutrient source. For nutrient risk assessment policy and
procedures see Title 190, General Manual (GM),
• To protect air quality by reducing odors, Part 402, Nutrient Management, and Title 190,
nitrogen emissions(ammonia, oxides of National Instruction (NI), Part 302, Nutrient
nitrogen), and the formation of atmospheric Management Policy Implementation.
particulates.
To assess the risk of nitrogen leaching loss, the
• To maintain or improve the physical, nitrogen Leaching Index, obtained through use
chemical, and biological condition of soil. of current Soil Hydrologic Group(SHG)-based LI
index maps in Section II of the NC FOTG OR
CONDITIONS WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES RUSLE 2 field-specific soil loss calculations,
This practice applies to all lands where plant must be completed on all planned fields.
nutrients and soil amendments are applied.This In North Carolina,the Phosphorus Loss
standard does not apply to one-time nutrient Assessment Tool (PLAT) is utilized to assess P
applications to establish perennial crops. loss risk on a field specific basis.
CRITERIA To assess the field specific risk of phosphorus
loss, PLAT evaluations are applicable to
General Criteria Applicable to All planned fields that meet either of the following
Pub conditions:
A nutrient budget for nitrogen, phosphorus, and • Condition 1: the phosphorus application
potassium must be developed that considers all rate for manure or commercial nutrients—
potential sources of nutrients including, but not including applied starter P--exceeds soil test
limited.to, green manures, legumes, crop report rate guidelines for the planned
residues, compost, animal manure, organic by- crop(s), or
products, biosolids, waste water, organic matter,
soil biological activity, commercial fertilizer, and Condition 2: the planned area is within the
watershed for a 303d-listed water body, and
Conservation practice standards are reviewed periodically and updated if needed. To obtain NRCS, NC
the current version of this standard,contact your Natural Resources Conservation Service
State Office or visit the Field Office Technical Guide. December 2014

590-2
ag-related P loss is identified by NC DENR ditches, or surface inlets)must receive nutrients
DWR as a likely contributor to the consistent with the setback restrictions, such as
impairment. (A current parameter indicating those described by current Senate Bill 1217
potential nutrient-related impairment is Committee Guidance and state law for manure.
Chlorophyll A.)The most current version of Applications of irrigation water must minimize
the NC 303d list is available on the NC DWR the risk of nutrient loss to surface and
website at: groundwater.
Lttp-ilportal.ncdenr.org/web/Wq/ps/mtu/assessment.
PLAT is not required when-neither Condition 1 Soil pH must be maintained in a range that
nor Condition 2 applies to the planned field. enhances an adequate level for crop nutrient
availability and utilization.
When PLAT is determined applicable to the Soil, Manure,and Tissue Sampling and
planned field by meeting Condition 1 or Laboratory Analyses (Testing).
Condition 2, it will not be required when NRCS,
through coordination with the NC Interagency Nutrient management plans must be developed
Nutrient Management Committee(INMC), has utilizing current soil test results, no more than 3
determined conditions where the risk of years old.
;:ftsr_)horus loss in a planned field is low.
Soil samples shall be collected and prepared
PLAT is not rer_;uired if all of the following 'low in accordance with North Carolina State
risk' conditions apply to the planned field(s): University or the North Carolina Department
of Agriculture and Consumer Services
• 5 years old or less PLAT field assessment (NCDA&CS)Agronomic Division standards
or recommendations. Standards and
recommendations for collection and preparation
• Manure sludge (as is typical with lagoon of soil samples are outlined in pertinent NCSU
sludge maintenance or lagoon closures)has Dept of Soil Science Soil Facts publications.
not been applied since the last PLAT field
assessment; Current soil tests are those that are no older
than 3 years, but may be taken on an interval
• The previous PLAT Total P rating score is recommended by NCSU/NCDA crop and soils
45 or less for the planned field(s). specialist guidance or as required by state law.
The area represented by a soil test must be
• The planned field is not to be included in consistent with soil testing procedures
land application of lagoon sludge through recommended by NCSU and/or NCDA&CS.
closure or maintenance Soil test analyses can be performed by any
laboratory or program that is certified by the
NC PLAT rating categories commensurate with North Carolina Department of Environment
national 590 P-loss risk categories are noted in and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division
the"Manure Nutrient A i,- Iication Rates"section of Water Quality, Laboratory Section.
of this standard, (See Table 590-1), and are NCDA&CS Agronomic Division uses the
considered to have equivalent criteria for Mehlich-3 extractant process for soil testing.
purposes of P application planning.
Producers who utilize non-NCDA Agronomic
State or Federally permitted animal operations Division soil testing labs must obtain nutrient
are required to complete PLAT assessments at recommendations made using Mehlich-3
intervals required by the regulatory entity. methodology or NCDA-equivalent conversion
equations. This is to ensure laboratories provide
On organic operations, the nutrient sources and consistent soil test-based nutrient rate
recommendations made using guidelines and
management must be consistent with the methodologies similar to NCDA&CS Agronomic
USDA's National Organic Program. Division, supported by available NC field
research and reference information, and are
Areas contained within minimum application compatible with North Carolina nutrient
setbacks (e.g., sinkholes, wellheads, gullies,
NRCS, NC
December 2014

590-3
management planning tools and nutrient risk objectives and capabilities. Sufficiently
assessment tools. documented actual yield information per
Soil and tissue testing shall include analyses for NCSU/NCDA guidelines may be utilized by a
any nutrients for which specific information is qualified specialist to develop a crop RYE for
available and/or needed to develop the nutrient planned fields. Established RYE data for
plan. Request analyses pertinent to monitoring common crops in each NC county, based on soil
or amending the annual nutrient budget, e.g. pH, productivity information, yield data, and research
electrical conductivity(EC), soil organic matter, with NC soils and cropping systems is available
nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. at the NCSU Nutrient Management in NC
Nutrient values of manure, organic by-products website:
and biosolids must be determined prior to land htt-)://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/vields/index.i:;hL)
application. In North Carolina, the most current
nutrient values of manure are posted on the If established RYE values or sufficiently
NCSU Nutrient Management in North Carolina documented yield information does not exist for
website a crop, a nitrogen fertilization rate recommended
(httD:Hnutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/index.htm). by NCSU or NCDA&CS agronomy and nutrient
Manure analyses must include, at minimum, management specialists may be developed in
total nitrogen(N), ammonium N, total coordination with the NC INMC. In the absence
phosphorus (P)or P205, total potassium (K)or of this recommendation, or until documented
K20, percent solids, Copper(Cu), and Zinc yield information has been collected,the nutrient
(Zn), or follow NCSU and/or NCDA&CS management planner may infer a realistic yield
guidance regarding required analyses. from a similar crop on a soil with similar physical
Samples must be collected, prepared, stored, and chemical features.The same procedure
and shipped following NCSU and NCDA&CS applies when establishing a RYE for a new crop.
recommended procedures, outlined in the NCSU The nutrient management plan should document
Dept of Soil Science Soil Facts publication
the source of the RYE.
Waste Analysis.
When planning for new or modified livestock Estimates of yield response must consider
operations, available standard information, factors such as low soil crop RYEs, drainage,
recognized by NRCS, such as manure nutrient pH, salinity, etc., prior to assuming that nitrogen
source and production values posted on the and/or phosphorus are deficient.
NCSU Nutrient Management in NC website, and Nutrient application rates lower than those
those included in NC nutrient management recommended are permissible if the grower's
planning software, may be used if they objectives are met.
accurately estimate nutrient output from the Applications of biosolids or pop-up fertilizers
proposed operation. Manure testing analyses must be accounted for in the nutrient budget.
must be performed by laboratories successfully
meeting the requirements and performance Liming material shall be applied as needed to
standards of the NCDA&CS Agronomic adjust soil pH to the specific range required
Division. by the crop or crops in the rotation for
Planned Nutrient Application Rates optimum availability and utilization of
nutrients.
Planned nutrient application rates for nitrogen,
phosphorus, and potassium must not exceed The recommended rates of N/P/K application
NCSU-recommended guidelines or NCSU from all sources, as documented in the planned
recognized industry practice. nutrient budget, must be determined based on
Determination of planned nutrient application the following guidance:
rates must consider crop/cropping sequence, Nitrogen Application—Planned nitrogen
current NCDA or similarly based soil test results, application rates for must match the RYE-
NC Realistic Yield Expectations (RYEs), crop based or specialist recommended rates as
yield response to applied nutrients, nutrient risk closely as possible for the predominant soil
assessment results, and producer management
NRCS, NC
December 2014

590-4
map unit in each planned field or cover crops is highly variable and site
management zone. condition dependent.
Where manure or organic by-products is a Starter Fertilizers-When starter fertilizers
source of land applied nutrients, see"Additional are used, they shall be included in the
Criteria to Properly Utilize Manure and Organic overall nutrient budget, and applied'in
By-Products—Manure Nutrient Application accordance with NC State University or
Rates"for further guidance on N rates. NCDA&CS recommendations. Current
Where intensely managed prescribed grazing NCSU recommendations are that no starter
systems facilitate enhanced manure nitrogen P is to be applied to soils or sites that rate
recycling, see the"Considerations"section of Very High through NCDA Soil Tests or
this standard for further guidance on N rates. PLAT.
Phosphorus Application - Planned Implementation of Recommended Nutrient
phosphorus application rates for planned fields Application Rates
must match the soil test recommended rates as Actual nutrient application rates for nitrogen,
closely as possible. When manure or organic phosphorous, and potassium must match
by-products is a source of land applied nutrients, planned/recommended rates as closely as
see"Additional Criteria to Properly Utilize possible, and may not exceed those established
Manure and Organic By-Products'=Manure through criteria attributed to risk assessment
Nutrient Application Rates for further guidance results
on P rates. Actual nitrogen application rates may not exceed
• Potassium Application—Planned planned/recommended rates.
potassium application rates for planned Actual Phosphorous or potassium application
fields must match the soil test recommended rates may exceed planned/recommended rates
rates as closely as possible except in when custom blended fertilizers and precision
manure application situations. Potassium application technology are not available, and
shall not be applied in situations in which when manure or other organic by-products are
excess (greater than soil test potassium used as a nutrient source in accordance with
recommendation)causes unacceptable Planned Manure Nutrient Application Rates
nutrient imbalances in crops or forages. criteria in this standard.
When forage quality is an issue associated Exceeding the recommended nutrient rates
with excess potassium application, state (from soil test/RYE) using manure or inorganic
standards shall be used to set forage quality fertilizer on a long term basis is potentially
guidelines. harmful to crop production and water quality.
• Other Plant Nutrients-The planned rates Nutrient Sources.
of application of other nutrients shall be
consistent with NCSU or NCDA&CS Nutrient sources utilized must be compatible
guidance recommendations. High levels of with the application timing, tillage and planting
soil Copper and Zinc may be toxic to system, soil properties, crop, crop rotation, soil
production crops. Copper and zinc soil test organic content, and local climate to minimize
index levels must be monitored, and risk to the environment.
planned land application of copper and zinc Nutrient Application Timing and Placement.
must be in accordance with NCSU/NCDA
crop toxicity guidelines. Timing and placement of all nutrients must
• Legume Cover Crops—When legume correspond as closely as practical with plant
cover crops are grown to serve as a nitrogen nutrient uptake (utilization by crops), and
source for the subsequent production crop, consider nutrient source, cropping system
appropriate nitrogen credit must be given to limitations, soil properties, weather conditions,
the production crop in accordance with drainage system, soil biology, and nutrient risk
available NCSU, CES, or NCDA&CS assessment results.
recommendations. Planners should note Nutrients must not be surface-applied if nutrient
that residual N availability from legume losses offsite are likely, such as with frozen
and/or snow covered soils, and saturated soils.
NRCS, NC
December 2014

590-5
controlled by the producer must be accounted
for in a nutrient management plan.,
Nutrient Management Plan Development Concentrated feeding area acreage in land
In addition to NCDA soil test recommendations, application fields, where vegetation has been
the nutrient management plan must be based on destroyed or severely damaged, should not be
approved values for RYEs, nitrogen factors, included in the nutrient management plan for
phosphorus removal rates, default nutrient land application of additional nutrients.
values for animal waste, plant availability In development of the nutrient management
coefficients for N, P, and K, animal waste plan, planners must correctly identify the land
generation volumes, and for manure, application application crop in order to ensure that proper
timing windows per SB 1217 Interagency Group nutrient application rates are specified in the
guidance. Appropriate values, including nutrient plan.
application rates, are those approved by the
N.C. Interagency Nutrient Management Additional Criteria to Minimize
Committee(INMC) based on NCSU- Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution
recommended guidelines. NC RYEs are found of Surface and Groundwater
at: Planners must use the current NRCS-approved
httL//nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/yields/index.r hc.
Historic farm records may also be used through nitrogen, phosphorus, and soil erosion risk
use of a procedure provided in SB 1217 assessment tools to assess the risk of nutrient
Interagency Group guidance. and soil loss. Identified resource concerns must
be addressed to meet current planning criteria
Historically accepted and approved NCSU (quality criteria).
manure nutrient values can continue to be When PLAT categorical field ratings are HIGH,
utilized in existing nutrient management plans OR when the Nitrogen LI > 10 for the planned
unless a `major modification' of the plan as field, appropriate conservation practices and/or
defined in current SB 1217 Interagency Group application techniques must be included in the
guidance, is required or requested by the conservation plan and/or Comprehensive
producer(see Operation &Maintenance section Nutrient Management Plan (CNMP)to control or
of this standard for more information). trap nutrients before they can leave the field via
surface or subsurface drainage (if present). The
The most current values must be utilized for number of applications and the application rates
newly developed nutrient management plans,for must also be considered to limit the transport of
new application fields added to existing plans, nutrients to tile. See the document"Soil Rating
for existing plans with SB 1217 guidance- for Nitrate and Soluble Nutrients"in Section II of
defined major modification revisions, or upon the FOTG for further technical guidance.
producer request. When nutrients are applied to fields where
For livestock classes or other types of waste erosion exceeds soil loss tolerance("T"), a site
without default information on the NCSU assessment must be conducted to determine
website, use available values from the USDA need for mitigation practices that reduce
Agricultural Waste Management Field sediment delivery and surface runoff. If site
Handbook, Chapter 4—Agricultural Waste assessment concludes that mitigation practices
Characteristics, available at: are needed, appropriate practices must be
ft://fty.wcc.nres.usda.Qov/wntsc/AWM/handboo included in the conservation plan.
k/ch4.adf Nutrients must be applied with the right
placement, in the right amount, at the right time,
All manure waste applied on land owned by or and from the right source to minimize nutrient
controlled by an Animal Feeding Operation losses to surface and groundwater. The
(AFO)owner or operator must be included in a following nutrient use efficiency strategies must
nutrient management plan. The volume be considered in accordance with NCSU and
difference in total manure waste generated by NCDA recommendations:
the AFO and waste applied to land not owned or
NRCS, NC
December 2014

590-6
• slow and controlled release fertilizers; may result in an application rate for other
and nitrification and urease inhibitors nutrients that exceeds the soil test
(for NC specific information, see NCSU recommendation.
Soil Facts publication Alternative Manure phosphorus a;,t=lication rates must be
Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizer Products for planned based on criteria attributed a risk
Row Crop Production, available at: assessment results as determined by the most
httats1AG-439-ncsu.edu/publications/So recent field-specific PLAT risk evaluation. The
ilfacts/AG-439-74Aprilf). specific field conditions that require PLAT use is
• incorporation or injection detailed in.the General Criteria of this standard.
Manure P application criteria are shown in
• timing and number of applications Table 590-1.
• coordinate nutrient applications with Where PLAT is utilized, the total rating will be
optimum crop nutrient uptake calculated using the most erosive projected crop
• tissue testing, chlorophyll meters, and in the P application planning period, in order to
spectral analysis technologies ensure manure P is not applied at a rate above
the risk rating in the highest erosion year of the
• adaptive nutrient management crop rotation where manure is applied. The soil
techniques as recommended by NCSU erosion data input for the most erosive crop
• other NCSU and NCDA supported must be derived from RUSLE 2 and stated as
technologies that improve nutrient use tons/ac/year.
efficiency and minimize surface or Table 590-1. PLAT Rating Categories and
groundwater resource concerns. Manure Nutrient Application Criteria
Additional Criteria Applicable to Properly PLAT Equivalent NC Manure
Utilize Manure or Organic BY-Products RATING National 590 P- Nutrient
as a Plant Nutrient Source (Total loss risk Application
The total single irrigation event application of PLAT category Criteria
liquid manure: rating
score
• must not exceed the soil's infiltration or LOW (0- LOW Nitrogen-
water holding capacity 25) based
• must be based on crop rooting depth, manure
utilizing available information in the application
NRCS NC Irrigation Guide MEDIUM LOW Nitrogen-
(26-50) based
• must be adjusted to avoid runoff or loss manure
to subsurface tile drains. _ application
• must meet conditions of the applicable HIGH MODERATE P-based
permit for the animal operation. (51-100) manure
application
Crop production activities and nutrient use (limited to P
efficiency technologies as recommended by uptake in
NCSU and NCDA must be coordinated to take harvested
advantage of mineralized plant-available biomass;.
nitrogen losses due to denitrification or ammonia VERY HIGH No additional
volatilization. HIGH manure OR
Planned Manure Nutrient Application Rates
(>100) starter P
application to
Manure nitrogen application rates must be be specified
planned based on RYE-based nitrogen needs of in plan
the application crop,or NCSU/NCDA&CS
specialist recommendation in the absence of
RYE information. The plan must include the For planning requirements and documentation
where PLAT is completed, see"Post PLAT
Leaching Index value. Nitrogen-based rates
N RCS, NC
December 2014

590-7
Planning Requirements"section included in cal.guidance/forestry a,r)nlication widance.pdf)
"Planning and Specifications" part of this for application criteria.
standard. Heavy Metal Monitoring for Biosolids and
Single event manure phosphorus applications Manures. When sewage sludge(biosolids) is
A single event application of phosphorus applied applied,the accumulation of potential pollutants
in manure(such as when lagoon sludge is (including arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead,
applied during a lagoon closure or lagoon mercury, selenium, and zinc) in the soil must be
storage maintenance)or organic by-product may monitored in accordance with the US Code,
be made at a rate equal to the recommended Reference 40 CFR, Parts 403 and 503, and/or
phosphorus application or estimated phosphorus any applicable state and local laws or
removal in harvested plant biomass for the crop regulations.
rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Additional information on heavy metal criteria for
When such single manure-based applications of sewage sludge and Biosolids may be found at:
phosphorus are made for multiple-year crop hftp://water.eoa.gov/polwaste/Wastewater/treatm
sequence P needs,the rate must: ent/biosolids/index.cfm
• not exceed the recommended nitrogen Additional Criteria to Protect Air Quality
application rate during the year of by Reducing Odors Nitrogen Emissions
application, or and the Formation of Atmospheric
• not exceed the estimated nitrogen Particulates
removal in harvested plant bio-mass To address air quality concerns caused by odor,
during the year of application when nitrogen, sulfur, and/or particulate emissions; the
there is no recommended nitrogen source,timing, amount, and placement of
application, and nutrients must be adjusted to minimize the
negative impact of these emissions on the
• not exceed the application criteria environment and human health. One or more of
required by PLAT rating table 590-1, the following may be used:
and not be made on sites with a Very
High PLAT risk rating. • slow or controlled release fertilizers; and
nitrification and urease inhibitors(see
On PLAT"High"fields, where P application "Additional Criteria to Minimize
criteria requires manure P to be applied at a rate Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution of
not to exceed crop P uptake rate, single multi- Surface and Groundwater" section of
year based crop sequence P manure this standard for more information)
applications may be made. However, no
additional P can be applied until crop P uptake nutrient enhancement technologies
for the multi-year crop sequence equals the incorporation
amount of manure P applied in the single year
application. injection
Manure or organic by-products must not be stabilized nitrogen fertilizers
applied more than 30 days prior to planting of
the crop or forages breaking dormancy, and for • residue and tillage management
NC permitted animal operations, must be no-till or strip-till
applied within approved crop application
windows as noted in the Certified Animal Waste other technologies that minimize the
Management Plan. Also, manure or organic by- impact of these emissions
products may be applied on legumes at rates Do not apply poultry litter, manure, or organic
equal to the estimated removal of nitrogen in by-products of similar dryness/density when
harvested plant biomass, not to exceed NCSU there is a high probability that wind will blow the
recommendations. material offsite. Operators will handle and apply
When land receiving manure is predominantly poultry litter or other dry types of animal
pine forest, refer to NC INMC Issue Guidance manures when the potential for wind-driven loss
"Animal Waste Application on Forest Land" is low and there is less potential for transport of
(htt J/nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/intera enc /techni particulates into the atmosphere.
NRCS, NC
December 2014

r
590-8
Additional Criteria to Improve or application rates. To identify a RYE based on
Maintain the Physical, Chemical, and actual yield data, determine the average of the
_Biological Condition of the Soil to highest three yields of the last five consecutive
Enhance Soil Quality for Crop specific crop or forage harvests.
Production and Environmental Use no-till/strip-till in combination with cover
Protection crops to sequester nutrients, increase soil
Time the application of nutrients to avoid periods organic matter, increase aggregate stability,
when field activities will result in soil compaction. reduce compaction, improve infiltration, and
enhance soil biological activity to improve
In areas where salinity is a concern, select nutrient use efficiency.
nutrient sources that minimize the buildup of soil
salts. Use nutrient management strategies such as
cover crops, crop rotations, and crop rotations
CONSIDERATIONS with perennials to improve nutrient cycling and
reduce energy inputs.
Third Party Applicators/Manure Haulers
Use variable-rate phosphorus and potassium
General information on manure waste generated application rates based on site-specific
by an AFO to be applied to land not owned or variability in crop yield, soil characteristics, soil
controlled by the AFO owner or operator may be test values, and other soil productivity factors.
recorded as specified in the NC CNMP Develop site-specific yield maps using a yield
Certification Sheet and Documentation Checklist monitoring system. Use the data to further
or other supplemental documentation to the diagnose low-and high-yield areas, or zones,
nutrient management plan. NRCS CNMP and make the necessary management changes.
technical criteria require documentation of See Title 190, Agronomy Technical Note(TN)
manure exports off the farm. The AFO 190.AGR.3, Precision Nutrient Management
owner/operator should provide the third party Planning.
applicator with a current waste analysis in order
to facilitate agronomic crop application of the Use manure management conservation
facility's generated waste. Should land not practices to manage manure nutrients to limit
owned or controlled by the AFO owner or losses prior to nutrient utilization.
operator be included in a nutrient management Apply manure at a rate that will result in an
plan, the complete plan must meet 590 criteria. "improving" Soil Conditioning Index(SCI)without
exceeding acceptable risk of nitrogen or
phosphorus loss.
Nitrogen application rates in intensely Use legume crops and cover crops to provide
managed prescribed grazing systems nitrogen through biological fixation and nutrient
For pasture fields implementing an intensely recycling.
managed prescribed grazing system, additional Modify animal feed diets to reduce the nutrient
applied nitrogen recommendations to meet content of manure following guidance contained
RYE-based crop needs or producer yield in Conservation Practice Standard (CPS)Code
objectives may be based on an estimated 592, Feed Management.
quantity of recycled livestock manure nitrogen.
This recommendation may be made upon Excessive levels of some nutrients can cause
producer requested grazing specialist analysis induced deficiencies of other nutrients, e.g., high
of grazing system efficiency and manure nutrient soil test phosphorus levels can result in zinc
distribution. The recycled manure nitrogen deficiency in corn.
portion of the overall RYE-based N Use soil tests, plant tissue analyses, and field
recommended rate will not exceed an amount observations to check for secondary plant
attributed to crop nitrogen availability through a nutrient deficiencies or toxicity that may impact
determined level of manure distribution plant growth or availability of the primary
uniformity in prescribed grazing systems.
nutrients.
Consider using documented actual yield data Use the adaptive nutrient management learning
from the planned site to determine nitrogen process to improve nutrient use efficiency on
NRCS, NC
December 2014

590-9
farms as outlined in the NRCS' National Nutrient grazing plan balancing forage produced with
Policy in GM 190, Part 402, Nutrient herd nutritional need, while preserving the grass
Management. forage stands included in the nutrient
Potassium should not be applied in situations management plan as a land application
where an excess(greater than soil test receiving crop.
potassium recommendation)causes nutrient Considerations to Protect Air Quality by
imbalances in crops or forages. Reducing Nitrogen and/or Particulate
Considerations to Minimize Agricultural Emissions to the Atmosphere.
Nonpoint Source Pollution of Surface and Avoid applying manure and other by-products
Groundwater. upwind of inhabited areas.
Use conservation practices that slow runoff, Use high-efficiency irrigation technologies (e.g.,
reduce erosion, and increase infiltration, e.g., reduced-pressure drop nozzles for center pivots)
filter strip, contour farming, or contour buffer to reduce the potential for nutrient losses.
strips. These practices can also reduce the loss For manure applications, consider location of
of nitrates or soluble phosphorus. nearby residences, or other locations where
NCSU research indicates that acidic soil humans may be present on a regular basis,
conditions contribute to high levels of water and any identified meteorological (e.g.,
solubility of soil P reactive products when prevailing winds at different times of the
organic waste P is applied. Thus,when soil year), or topographical influences that may
tests show that pH is below soil target pH and affect the transport of odors to those
lime is recommended, soils should be limed to locations,
increase soil pH to soil target levels prior to
application of organic waste materials. Target PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
pHs as established by NCDA Agronomic For NC DWR or NPDES permitted animal
Division are 5.0 for Organic soil class(ORG), operations, the plan and specifications must
5.5 for Mineral-Organic soil class (M-O), and include all elements required by the Certified
range from 6.0 to 6.5 for Mineral soil class(MIN)
Animal Waste Management Plan and Permit.
depending on the crop.
Use application methods and timing strategies The following components must be included in a
that reduce the risk of nutrient transport by nutrient management plan typical of
ground and surface waters, such as: `conventional'fertilizer and manure application
methods. Where precision ag/variable rate
• split applications of nitrogen to deliver application technology is utilized, see next
nutrients during periods of maximum section for additional guidance.
crop utilization, . aerial site photograph(s)/imagery or site
• banded applications of nitrogen and/or map(s), and a soil survey map of the
phosphorus to improve nutrient site
availability, A listing of nutrient application land
• drainage water management to reduce application areas, ie `fields' or
nutrient discharge through drainage management zones'.
systems, and
• Planned nitrogen application rates
• incorporation of surface-applied based on the RYE where available.
manures or organic by-products if
precipitation capable of producing runoff The Nitrogen Leaching Index for
or erosion is forecast within the time of planned fields.
planned application. • Planned P &K application rates based
Use bioreactors and multistage drainage on soil test results (not applicable where
strategies when approved by the land-grant P&K applied through variable rate
university.. technology).
When land application fields are grazed by • Sufficient soils information—such as
livestock, consider development of a prescribed dominant soil map unit for each planned
NRCS, NC
December 2014

590- 10
field—needed to apply nutrients at RYE estimated recycled and planned
and Soil Test Report determined rates additional nitrogen application amount.
as appropriate; and to not exceed rates Documentation method used to assess
determined by nutrient risk assessment manure distribution uniformity and then
planning criteria. determine recycled N included in the ,
• location of designated sensitive areas overall nitrogen rate recommendation
and the associated nutrient application must be included in the nutrient
restrictions and setbacks, management plan.
• results of any applicable approved risk When determining actual application rates, a
assessment tools for nitrogen, laboratory analysis is the preferred method to
determine nutrient values of manure and
phosphorus, and erosion losses. In NC, organic by-products to be applied, and is
most recent PLAT results are a required required by state laws or rules for regulated
part of the nutrient management plan operations. Waste reports from the NCDA&CS
where manure is applied. Agronomic Division, or equivalent, are
• current and/or planned plant production acceptable sources of information for
sequence or rotation, determining applied nutrient amounts for
recordkeeping or crop budgeting purposes.
• soil,water, compost, manure, organic
by-product, and plant tissue sample Precision/Variable Rate Nutrient Application
analyses applicable to the plan, Planning and Verification
• realistic yield goals for the crops, In precision ag/variable rate nutrient application
• complete nutrient budget for nitrogen, situations, some required planning components
phosphorus, and potassium for the of the preceding section, such as aerial photos,
plant production sequence or crop site maps, and soils information may be
rotation provided by the overall conservation plan.
• land application timing specifications The following components must be included in
based on crop needs and growth precision/variable rate nutrient management
response. For manure, land application planning and/or verification that actual
must be based on approved crop application rates for nitrogen, phosphorous, and
specific waste application windows potassium application match the recommended
rates as closely as possible.
• listing and quantification of all nutrient PLANNING
sources and form,
• in accordance with the nitrogen and RYE-based nitrogen application rate
phosphorus risk assessment tool(s), recommendations must be provided to the
specify the recommended nutrient producer on each planned field. Planned
application source,timing, amount application rates may be made per soil
(except for precision/variable rate testing `zone' or per more conventional crop
applications specify method used to management field.
determine rate), and placement of plant . The Nitrogen Leaching Index value for each
nutrients for each field or management planned field. .
unit, and • The 590 Nutrient Management Job
• guidance for implementation, operation Sheet/Supplemental Information
and maintenance, and recordkeeping as
specified by the CNMP or applicable NC In non-variable rate situations, planned P&
DWR or NDPES permit. K rates based on soil test results as
specified in Soil Testing section of this
• On intensely managed grazed pasture standard must be provided to the producer
fields where quantity of assessed for each planned field. P &K soil test-based
recycled N is included in the N rate recommendations may be provided to
recommendation, a RYE-based the producer by NRCS or a producer
complete nitrogen budget that includes consultant. The source of the
NRCS, NC
December 2014

590- 11
recommendation must be retained by NRCS for each field or sub-field, and
as part of overall nutrient management
planning documentation. ♦information about conservation practices
VERIFICATION and management activities that can
reduce the potential for phosphorus
• Documentation per field nitrogen application movement from the site.
rates do not exceed RYE-based
recommended rates Where increases in Soil Test P levels are
expected (typically where manure is applied with
• Documentation of the geo-referenced field Nitrogen as the limiting nutrient), the nutrient
boundary and data collected that was management plan must document:
processed and analyzed as a GIS layer or
layers to generate nutrient or soil Information on the NC PLAT rating
amendment recommendations. categories that will require P-based
• Documentation of the nutrient manure application (HIGH)AND where
recommendation guidance and no additional manure can be applied
recommendation equations used to convert (VERY HIGH)will be specified in the
the GIS base data layer or layers to a plan. Future manure P application
nutrient source material recommendation within 590 criteria will be based on site
GIS layer or layers. specific resource conditions,which will
y y facilitate data input into PLAT.
• Documentation if a variable rate nutrient or
soil amendment application was made. • Information on a P drawdown strategy
(reduction in soil phosphorus)for the
• Where variable rate application is done, manure application site. Should a P
documentation that phosphorous and drawdown be desired or necessary,the
potassium application rates do not exceed only proven method of reducing soil P is
rates specified by soil sampled zone based to not apply manure-based P and to
test results.Application records per plant and harvest crops that utilize P
management/soil sampled zone and geo- currently present in the soil surface.
referenced field must be provided.
• For non variable rate 'zone based' • When phosphorus is applied in excess
application of P &K, provide applied map of crop requirement, and where a PLAT
assessment is not conducted in
within individual field boundaries (or conjunction with providing assistance in
electronic records)documenting source, applying this standard, documentation
timing, method, and rate of all applications establishing the application site meets
that resulted from use of the precision 'low risk'conditions as'approved by the
agriculture process for nutrient or soil NC INMC and detailed in General
amendment applications. Criteria.
• Maintain the electronic records of the GIS • Conservation practices and/or
data layers and nutrient applications for at management activities or techniques
least 5 years. used to reduce the potential for P
• Where'chlorophyll' reader technology is transport and loss must be documented
utilized for real time, crop-need based in the conservation plan.
nitrogen application, application records that for AFOs, a quantification of manure
nitrogen rates match RYE-based N rates as produced in excess of crop nutrient
closely as possible. requirements if applicable.
Post PLAT Planning.Re uirements OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
When PLAT field evaluations are completed, the The owner/client is responsible for safe
nutrient management plan must include: operation and maintenance of this practice,
including all equipment. Operation and
♦a record of the PLAT assessment rating
NRCS, NC
December 2014

590-12
maintenance guidance provided to the client • all enhanced efficiency fertilizer
must address the following: products used.
1. The producer is encouraged to review the • Additional records for precision/variable
plan periodically to determine if adjustments rate sites must include:
or modifications to the plan are needed. In
NC, animal operations permitting provisions maps identifying the variable application
may specify more frequent review periods. source, timing, amount, and placement
For NPDES permitted animal operations, of all plant nutrients applied, and
plan revisions could trigger a permit revision . GPS-based yield maps for crops where
process that includes public review of the yields can be digitally collected.
plan. Planning requirements for Plan
"Amendments" (minor modifications)and 5. State laws or regulations may define record-
"Revisions"(Major Modifications)are keeping requirements for some operations.
clarified by SIB 1217 Interagency Group 6. Workers should be protected from and avoid
Guidance Sections 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6. unnecessary contact with inorganic
2. Protection of fertilizer and organic by- fertilizers and organic by-products.
product storage facilities from weather and Protection should include the use of
accidental leakage or spillage. protective clothing when working with plant
nutrients. Extra caution must be taken when
3. Proper calibration of application equipment handling ammonia sources of nutrients, or
to ensure uniform distribution of material at when dealing with organic wastes stored in
planned rates. unventilated enclosures.
4. Maintaining records to document plan 7 The disposal of material generated by the
implementation. Records should be cleaning of nutrient application equipment
maintained for five years, or for a period as should be accomplished properly. Excess
required by NC DWR General or NPDES material should be collected and stored or
Permits. To ensure adequate information field applied in an appropriate manner.
exists to support sound nutrient Excess material should not be applied on
management, NRCS recommends the areas of high potential risk for runoff or
following records be included: leaching.
• soil, plant tissue, water, manure, and 8. The disposal or recycling of nutrient
organic by-product analyses resulting in containers should be done according to
recommendations for nutrient state and local guidelines or regulations.
application,
9. Document the nutrient application rate.
• quantities, analyses and sources of When the applied rate differs from the
nutrients applied, planned rate, provide appropriate
• dates, and method(s)of nutrient documentation for the change.
applications, source of nutrients, and 10. Changes in animal numbers, management,
rates of application, and feed management will necessitate
• weather conditions and soil moisture at additional manure analyses to establish a
the time of application; lapsed time to revised average nutrient content.
manure incorporation; rainfall or 11 Field receiving animal manures and/or
irrigation event, biosolids must be monitored for the
• crops planted, planting and harvest accumulation of heavy metals and
dates,yields, nutrient analyses of phosphorus in accordance with NCSU
harvested biomass, and crop residues guidance and NC law.
removed, REFERENCES
• dates of plan review, name of reviewer, NCSU Nutrient Management In North Carolina
and recommended changes resulting website: httc://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/index.htm
from the review, and
NRCS, NC
December 2014

590- 13
North Carolina Agricultural Nutrient Assessment U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Tool(NCANAT)supporting literature: Resources Conservation Service. 2011, Title
http://nutrients.soil.nGsu.edu/index.htm 190, National Instruction (NI), Part 302, Nutrient
NC Interagency Nutrient Management Management Policy Implementation.
Committee technical guidance:
Washington, DC.
hft,-,,:Hnutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/Uuidance/
SB 1217 Interagency Group information and
guidance:
http://www.neaQr.-gov/SWC/tech/1217commiftee.
html
NC DENR DWR Animal Feeding Operations
website: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/W /aps/at
United States Department of Agriculture,
Agricultural Research Service, 2006. Best
Management Practices to Minimize Agricultural
Phosphorus Impacts on Water Quality:
http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/no/BestMcimtPractice
s/BestMnmtPracticeslntro.htm
USDA NRCS Agricultural Waste Management
Field Handbook online:
hfo://www.info.usda.gov/viewerFS.aspx?hid=21
430
Follett, R.F. 2001. Nitrogen transformation and
transport processes. In Nitrogen in the
environment; sources, problems, and solutions,
(eds.) R.F. Follett and J. Hatfield, pp. 17-44.
Elsevier Science Publishers. The Netherlands.
520 pp.
Schepers,J.S., and W.R. Ruan, (eds.)2008.
Nitrogen in agricultural systems.Agron. Monogr.
no. 49, American Society of Agronomy(ASA),
Crop Science Society of America(CSSA), Soil
Science Society of America (SSSA). Madison,
WI.
Sims,J.T. (ed.)2005. Phosphorus: Agriculture
and the environment.Agron. Monogr. no. 46.
ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison,WI.
Stevenson, F.J. (ed.) 1982. Nitrogen in
agricultural soils.Agron. Series 22.ASA, CSSA,
and SSSA, Madison,WI.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service. 2010.
Agronomy Technical Note, (TN) 190-AGR-3,
Precision Nutrient Management Planning.
Washington, DC.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural
Resources Conservation Service. 2011. Title
190, General Manual, (GM), Part 402, Nutrient
Management.Washington, DC.
NRCS, NC
December 2014

S
y
44
{
set 4
CIO
Far' ill�err,�ff��'
�jlGi�9 's
p
Pr°p
3

EMER GE_ CY ACTION PLAN
Fn0 ti`lr�'v1BERS '
EMERGr1CY INIAN-GENENT SYSTEti-1
Su-CD 7jLy:fg,.,7_6,0
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. Vou should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problern. You should make e':ery effort to
ensure that this does not happen. Tris plan should be posted in an accessible location for
aII employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
I. Stov the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be
ed respons.',s to some possible problems are lasted below.
possible. Suggest
A. Lagoon overflow-possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to benrn to inc:e:se -elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c: Stop all flows to the lagcon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor. .
e. Make sure no surace 'Hater is entering la2ocn.
B: Runoff from waste application field-actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the appli . .. t-tc� -FC.r the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and. spr:nklers-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to elirr:inala further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks F-ior to restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush ;:t•stems. houses. solid separators-action include:
a. Stop CeCVCle cur e.
i b. Eton trr'�pcil
Kurz Flo
u_ Stop all i1ow ;h� '- :� t �._ _ ;`iiu _ . :::atcrs.
l E. i�`

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a stnall sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and pump. back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused b.v burro,.ving ?nimals. trap or remove anitrals and fail
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side wails and Iagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration)
C. Any damage noted, such as employee iniury, fish kills, or property damage"
d. Did the spill leave the properrv?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f.- Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface :eaters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the propery)?
h_ How much reached surface waters?
Contact appropriate agencies.
a. Durins not-nal business hours. call your D WQ tDivision of Water Quality)
regional office: Phone - - After hours, emergency number: 919-733-39=2.
Your phone call should include: your na:-ne, facility, telephone number, the details
of the incident from item 2 above, Che exact location of the facility, the location or
direction of movement of the spill. weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken. and the ser44ousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local.SWCD office phone number -and local INRCS office for adviceltechnical assistance phone number - -- _
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
3: Contact the contractor of vOur choice to begin.repair of problem to minimize off-site
damage.
a. Contractors 'ame:—, �_— --------- - ---
b. Contractors .-address
c. Contractors Phone:

6: Contact the technical specialist v.ho cer,ified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting
Engineer. etc.) ,
a. i\ame: �Ly/�//4
b. Phone:
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage. repair the system. and reassess the waste management plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.

II
Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist II
sulil-cc ca.u.S.c 11NIPS to Millilliji-Le Nov She Specific Practices
-T-ar 11 i;l_C11-1 I* • Dairy production w-I'VegetalivV of wooded b1111'ers jl
w"Goodjudgment and common sense it
d
llavctl lids of bafil alley Wei 11WIllird-covered SlIffilces Pll"Scrapo or flush daily
suilaccs rir—i'Iroillote(frying with proper vetililation is
ce-1—toll1ille checks and olujikicnance on walerers,
llytiraols,pipes,stock tanks
11cillicd Mu;ls Urine P'llromole drying wills proper ve'llihili0l)
• partial microbial decomposition Replace wet or manure-covered bedding
Khoure dry slacks Tailial microbial decomposition 11rovidu liqllid drainage.For Stored 111,11111ft;
slillaac Imik Ill-basil • Partial microbial decomposilioll F.1 11olloill of 11141-1cVul loading
Sill face Nliging while filling ; n T1111k covers
• Agiullioll when U111111ying 0 Basin sklrEluu 111115 of Solids;
(W-1—VIiiiializo !I.,[ wilo(Tand liquid"Iddilions
np Agilale(.)Ifly prior to 111,11111re ruillovill
r proven ices
additives or oxidants
Scufillg krlll slill'-.1ces • Partial microbial decuillposiiinil M Liquid dr;1il'i.1'1,Troll settle(!Solids
• Mixing while Filling E-1 RuIllove solldS regularly
A Agitation whenI emptying /Y/R
•
Njamirc, Slim y or sludge - Agiialian Wliell SIVe;L(liog F1 Soil Injeclioll ofshirry/sludges
Bpiceder annuls luls 0 Villulilt:gas cillissiolls rq Wash residual Illallule 111-olli spreader'Ifier use
Cl Proven biological additives or oxidwils
Vulillila gas callissions while F.1 Soil injectiolk of'slurry/sIlIdBus
Slurry or Sludge(III field drying F1 ,'joil incorporation within'IS lifs
bill I-ILLCS P/Spread ill 111ill 1111illorin layers I'M-rapid drying
rl Proven biological additives of oxidullis
Agimliou ofrucycled lagoon Cl Hush I'luk covers;
lilplid while wilks are 1-111ing
Rl 11xicild fill lillus to neon.hollool oflanks wilt
all 11-sipholl Vents / /� /
Oillside drain collection Agilation during waslewaler n nox covers ... ...
ormuclitill linxes collveyaller

Source Cause Urvill's to Minimize Odor Sile Specific Praclices
Lift Sulliolls 0 Agitation during sump tank L-1 Sump lank covers
filling and drawdown
l:nd of dwillpipes at & Agitation during wastewater
cullveyallce lagoon liquid level
Lagoon Sill faces 6 Volatile gas emission;. El Proper-lagoon liquid capacity;
6 Biological mixing; 0 Correct lagoon startup P170MILIMS,
ft Agilalion Cl Minimurn surface area-lo-volume ratio;
0 millinillm agitation When puraping.
n Mechunical aeration;
III-iginjit:- :-prilll:ier * I figh pressure agilation; F1 Irrigate on dry days Willi little or no willd.,
(1 L1.I L:. a wiful drift F1 Milli,1111111 recommended operaiing procediii u;
11111111) inlake licar lagoon liquid Surface;
111111111 front second-stage lagoon;
Fj 1,111sh residual manure front pipes 11 end of
slurry/sludge 1111111pings
I)ead i1111111111S 6 Carcass decomposition )I-ol)cl.111sposki.oll of arcasses
Slaildilig wilIL:1.awillill 6 Improper drailluge; 111-IZ11-adu and lillidscape such that water drahis
lacilitics 6 Mici-olliai decomposilioll of away from facilities
organic mailer
Moll Illd 11 iluk:d mill)public , 11(larly Illaililailked access I-mids V-1.11.111 access road IllaillIC111,111CL:
lo;I&Ls limll fi-irill access
AddiliollA AVilihillh: F1011l
mIL: mamirc N-boagemew 0201)Rule/1IM11 Packet NCS1 1. C(miuy F mension C"citler
I),lio, Fdlicillimull thkil Manure Mallagellicill syslaill-Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboralory ; EDA F 209-95 WISH - BAI:
kil!1loll !Design and MallaBelliew for Livestock mantire'rreatment and Storage ; HBAF 103-83 NCSIJ - BAF
Nklll!lL!L1llt:lll of[)air), Waslewaler; FBAF 106-83 NCS11 - 11AF
(%dibl"illon III'Mallurc and Waslewaler Application Equipment EBAF Fact Sheet NC'kil) - HAF
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure mallagelilem:Odors and Flies ; PRO 107. 1995 Confere.nee Proceedings Florida Cooperative f.,xiellsioll
A 1 lovendwr 11, 1996, Page 2

I
Insect Control Checklist for Animal operations II;'
Shccifi►: Practices ill
(:►arse I11�11°s to Gt{elrul lusccts — _ _ _ _ �.-_-- �
Suurrc l,'tsluid Syslcws — --- — -
-----
Accunudalioll of solids n- Flush system,is designed and operated l
I lo,l{Guucrs sufficiently to fell{ovc acc►nnulalcd solids from ` / l'
gut!ers as designed. (/u l
Cl Re{nove bridging of accunullaled solids;►l
{lischargc
basins and pill where
d Solids f�7�lvlainlain lagoons,settling
Cn►sle
t.i,goolu tail NIS • pest breeding Is apparent IU Illlnll{II'Le Illl
crusting of solids to a depth of no more Ihan C-
8 inches over more than 30%of surface.
. , , t)ecuyiug vegelaliolt f�► Moiulaill vegetative control along banks of
li,ccs�ive V cLclalive lagoons and other impolloilmellts to pluVL'l1l
lilulvtll ,lec►unulalioll of decaying vegetative loader
;{long water's edge on hupouullnlenl's perimeter.
-.--.-.---- - ---- Dry Systems
fY Design, operate and ulainPllilt Iecd syslen►s(e.g
Spillage
I'cc�lcl:. bunkers and troughs)to minimi'Lc the
accuuullalion of decaying waslage.
tn.lacan up spillage on a routine basis
day inlu'val during summer; 15-30 day inlcrval
during winlcr). ------
_ _ _ 11Y ltetll{eC uu{isulre accuanllatioll within will
I:ec,l Stwat;e Accuuu►laliullsof fee°I{csi,lues around imnte►liale perimeter of Iced slorage
areas by insuring ilrainage away from site
and/or providing adcrl{late containu►ent (e.g•.
covered hill for brewer's grain will similar high
{aoisture grain products).
Inspect (i{r ai{d revuove or break up accum►dutell
• soll°Is iu litter strips aromid feed swraga as
ucedt:d.
u..t;: .

V
f
Cause IIIMPS In Conlrol Insects Sife Specific Practices
Animal Holding Aicus Accumulations 01711"i'llul wasles ft),""Eliminale low areas Ilim Irap nioisfure along
feed waslage fences and olher locations where%vasic
accumulales and dislurbalice by Imilliuls is
minimal.
FV'M' aiPlain fence rows and ftller•slrips around
animal holding areas to Illillilllize 'accliffillhili011s of walsics(i.e., inspecl for and
remove or break tip accimitilaied solids as
Dry Manure I laildfing Accumulations ofimillijil wasles P"�Relll()vc sPH1.19c on a follfitle basis 7 - 10
(lay interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during%vinier)where manure is loaded for land
application or disposal.
fa/Provide for adeq,tiale drainage arolujil manure
11 loc1q)OVS.
(P Inspect for.11111 remove or break 111)aCCIIIIIIIIalell
wastes in filler strips around sladpiles and
IIIIIIIIIN handling areas as needed.
For 11111re iliftli'lliatioll colll'i':I 111c Coopel-alive EXICIISioll Service, I)CIIIII-1111cla of F-11(mliology, Box 7013,florlIt Cill-olijul
Raleigh, HC, 27695-1613.
Ahl.)('- Ijilveollier 11, 1996, Page 2

1-lortaIitr Management Methods
(check which me:hod(s) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the' Around within 21 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from anv flowing
stream or public bodv of water.
D RenderinE at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-I63.7
:.1 Complete incineration:
In the case of dearLl poultry oniy_ piacing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of A-riculture
:J Anv method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvase of par-L of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (�Vritt--n approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)

Version—November 26,2018
Mortality Management Methods
Indicate which method(s) will be implemented.
When selecting multiple methods indicate a primary versus secondary option.
Methods other than those listed must be approved by the State Veterinarian.
Primary Secondary Routine Mortality
a Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours of knowledge of animal
death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water
(G.S.106-403). The bottom of the burial pit should be at least one foot above the seasonal
high water table.Attach burial location map and plan.
Landfill at municipal solid waste facility permitted by NC DEQ under GS 15A NCAC
13B .0200.
URendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
Complete incineration according to 02 NCAC 52C .0102.
A composting system approved and permitted by the NC Department of Agriculture&Con-
sumer Services Veterinary Division (attach copy of permit). If compost is distributed off-farm,
additional requirements must be met and a permit is required from NC DEQ.
El 1:1 In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the
NC Department of Agriculture&Consumer Services (G.S. 106-549.70).
a Any method which, in the professional opinioniof the State Veterinarian, would makepossible
the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health.
(Written approval by the State Veterinarian must be attached).
Mass Mortality Plan
Mass mortality plans are required for farms covered by an NPDES permit. These plans are
also recommended for all animal operations. This plan outlines farm-specific mortality man-
agement methods to be used for mass mortality. The NCDA&CS Veterinary Division sup-
ports a variety of emergency mortality disposal options; contact the Division for guidance.
• A catastrophic mortality disposal plan is part of the facility's CAWMP and is activated
when numbers of dead animals exceed normal mortality rates as specified by the State
Veterinarian.
• Burial must be,done in accordance with NC General Statutes and NCDA&CS Veterinary
Division regulations and guidance.
• Mass burial sites are subject to additional permit conditions(refer to facility's animal
waste management system permit).
• In the event of imminent threat of a disease emergency,the State Veterinarian may enact
additional temporary procedures or measures for disposal according to G.S. 106-399.4.
/ . -
z6—/9
Signatur f Far Owner/Manager Date
Signature of Technical Specialist Date

t
General Guidelines for Dairies
(August 9, 1996) .
1. All solids from paved areas must be collected in a waste storage facility.
Surface runoff from paved areas must be minimized by the use of practices
such as gutters, roofs, and diversion ditches.
?. All liquids from paved and milking areas must be collected in a waste
storage facility or in some other �vay treated to insure only a de minim_us
discharge of pollutants in a storm event less severe than the 25 year, 2=
hour storm event. For anv facility wislaing to install a systeni other than a
waste storage facility, a request must be made for a site specific
determination in accordance with the criteria established in 19.F. or the
THIRD Guidance 'Memo dated August 9, 1996..
3. All dry stacks must include either a roof and be able to retain all liquids; or
all liquids must -be handled like those from paved and milking areas as
described in item 2 above.
A. A 100 foot filter strip must be established be-nveen lour_ging areas that are
typically void of vegetation during the winter months and any perennial
streams, ponds, and drainage ways. The filter strip must be protected by a
fence. Where a 100-foot filter stria cannot be installed, diversions,
settling basins, or other conservation practices must-be used.
S. A filter strip of at least 25 feet must be established between heavv traffic
areas with sparse vegezationn and drainage ways. The filter strip must be
protected by a fence.
6• Perennial streams surrounded by a good stand of pasture roust be protected
by a fence when the streams are in pastures that are in close proximity to
the dairy operations or when the livestock typically cross the stream from
the pasture to get to the barn, Eroded or barren stream banks due to
animal traffic are evidence that animal exclusion is needed.
7. Where stream buffers are intended for runoff pollutant filtering,
measures to minimize charinelization and promote sheet flow must be
installed and maintained.
S. Stream, crossings must be installed where needed.
9. Stock- trails must be installer as needer.
10. A properiv designed and i nnplernen ted Waste Utilization Plan :rust be
developed and implemented.

6-7-F7
"s
\ 21" QO dal}/
- 7
.2" o d©
7z
va,x- c7�jd!/�J /.� �t�e Z o)o
C/
9. ' X local X S� �C� J�?J•[I Jf�'G� Oi" 5� ��
/. jyC'o wyoi�y �D Daly S� �C

i
i
i
� 1
i
i
t
i
i
1
f
I '
l
1 -
i
t
ok--r

h 2 I � X lob
zo - �o
, n
� `` � 'o 3
2-4 s � � � s
a C7--
�.
1
_ V
W

WASTE STORAGE ESTIMATES
1. Waste Storage Pond (Existing
size = 135' X 66' X 12' ( 10.5' operating) = 106,920 ft cu
Design Volume= 380 cows X 21 gallons/head/dav X.5 day/day 7.48 cu ft/gallon=534 cu ft/day,
Water Shed=( 135'X 66' ) +( 100'X*150' (concrete lot&roof))X 15.26"rain- 1025".
evaporation=9,962 cu ft/3 months
or 1.12 ft.of depth. 9.4' operating depth left or 83,754 cu ft
DESIGN
3 month storage=380 cows X 21 gallon/head/day X .5 days on lot -7.48 cu ft/gallon=
534 cu ft/day X 90 day storage=48,060 cu ft
+23,910 sq ft watershed X.4166' rainfall -evaporation
@ peak 3 months=58,022 cu ft waste and watershed 3 months storage
VOLU1vIE
135' x 66' =8910 sq ft surface
58.022 =(8910 sq ft surface) �Y
58,022 cu ft volume needed 8.910 sq ft @ surface
= 6.5'blow full or 8.0'below top of dam(& lowest point
(maximum liquid level= 18"below top of dam)
�G r
-A\
; )�<<� - END?�'�?��?

USDA
& Maintenance Plan
USDA Waste Treatment Lagoon (359)
Landowner/Operator: Shelly Smith Dairy Date: 3/27/19
NRCS Service Center: Albemarle, NC Conservation District: Stanly SWCD
Practice Location: 35010'35" N 8008'41" W Tract/Field ID: T10327 Field3l
(LaVLong or UTM Coord. or Sec/TS/R)
Operation & Maintenance Requirements
The waste treatment lagoon was designed and installed to provide storage for biological treatment of
animal or other agriculture waste. The estimated life span of this installation is at least 15 years. The life
span of this practice can be assured and usually increased by developing and carrying out an operation
and maintenance (O&M) program.
You are required to perform inspections and O&M activities in order for this practice to achieve the
intended function, benefits, and design life. Items to inspect, operate, and maintain during the estimated
design life of this practice include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Operational requirements for emptying the waste treatment lagoon including the expected storage
period. Begin removal of the liquid from the waste treatment lagoon as soon as practical after the
maximum operating level has been reached. Also include the requirement that waste be removed
from the lagoon and utilized at locations, times, rates, and volume in accordance with the overall
waste management system plan.
• Include an explanation of the staff gauge or other permanent marker to indicate the maximum
operating level and the maximum operational drawdown.
• A provision for emergency removal and disposition of liquid waste in the event of an unusual storm
event that may cause the waste treatment lagoon structure to fill to capacity prematurely.
• Instructions as needed for ventilating confined spaces according to ASABE standard S607, Venting
Manure Storages to Reduce Entry Risk.
• An emergency action plan for lagoons where there is a potential for significant impact from breach or
accidental release. Include site-specific provisions for emergency actions that will minimize these
impacts.
• A description of the routine maintenance needed for each component of the facility. Also include
provisions for maintenance that may be needed as a result of waste removal or material deterioration.
• Instructions for keeping records on sludge accumulation and removal of sludge when the sludge
accumulation reaches the maximum residual solids storage level.
• Include instructions for anaerobic lagoons for including a precharging volume at lagoon startup or
following sludge removal. Precharge the anaerobic lagoon with fresh water equal to the MTV prior to
volatile solids loading.
• For Anaerobic lagoons, provide instruction on timing removal and spreading of wastewater in a
manner that will reduce odor release.
North Carolina NRCS Page 1 of 1 February 2019