760028_Permit Renewal Application 2019_20190410

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Animal Waste Management Systems
Request for Certification of Coverage
Facility Currently covered by an Expiring Sate Non-Discharge General Permit
On September 30, 2019, the North Carolina State Non-Discharge General Permits for Animal Waste Management Systems will
expire. As required by these permits, facilities that have been issued Certificates of Coverage to operate under these State
Non-Discharge General Permits must apply for renewal at least 180 days prior to their expiration date. Therefore,. all applications
must be received by the Division of Water Resources by no later than April 3,2019.
Please do not leave any question unanswered. Please verify all information and make any necessary corrections below.
Application must be signed and dated by the Permittee.
1. Farm Number: 76-0028 Certificate Of Coverage Number: AWC760028
YKs
2. Facility Name: Cashatt Dairy
3. Landowner's Name(same as on the Waste Management Plan): Doris Davis Cashatt
4. Landowner's Mailing Address: 5665 Davis Country Rd
City: Randleman State: NC Zip: 27317-7153
Telephone Number: 336-498-3563 Ext. E-mail:
5. Facility's Physical Address: 5631 Davis Country Rd
City: Randleman State: NC Zip: 27317
6. County where Facility is located: Randolph
7. Farm Manager's Name(if different from Landowner): Sidney Davis Chashatt
g, Farm Manager's telephone number(include area code): 336-498-4814 Ext.
9. Integrator's Name(if there is not an Integrator,write'None"):
10. Operator Name(OIC): Sidney D.Cashatt Phone No.: 336-498-1675 OIC#: 21310
11. Lessee's Name(if there is not a Lessee,write'None"):
12. Indicate animal operation type and number:
Current Permit: Operations Type Allowable Count
Cattle-Milk Cow 279
Operation Tvpes:
Swine Cattle Dry Poultry Other Types
Wean to Finish Dairy Calf Non Laying Chickens Horses-Horses
Wean to Feeder Dairy Heifer Laying Chickens Horses-Other
Farrow to Finish Milk Cow Pullets Sheep-Sheep
Feeder to Finish Dry Cow Turkeys Sheep-Other
Farrow to Wean Beef Stocker Calf Turkey Pullet
Farrow to Feeder Beef Feeder
Boar/Stud Beef Broad Cow Wet Poultry
Gilts Other Non Laying Pullet
Other Layers

13. Waste Treatment and Storage Lagoons (Verify the following information is accurate and complete. Make all necessary
corrections and provide missing data.)
Design
Estimated Liner Type Estimated Freeboard
Structure Date (Clay,Synthetic, Capacity Surface Area "Redline"
Name Built Unknown) (Cubic Feet) (Square Feet) (Inches)
WASTE STORAGE J ��
POND $ S Gff7N I�� e/
Mail one (1) copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with this completed and signed application
as required by NC General Statutes 143-215.1OC(d)to the address below.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
1. The most recent Waste Utilization Plan(WUP),signed by the owner and a certified technical ssiecialist,containing:
a. The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields(e.g.irrigation,injection,etc.)
b. A map of every field used for land application(for example:irrigation map)
c. The soil series present on every land application field
d. The crops grown on every land application field
e. The Realistic Yield Expectation(RYE)for every crop shown in the WUP
f. The maximum PAN to be applied to every land application field
g. The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
h. The required NRCS Standard specifications
2. A site map/schematic
3. Emergency Action Plan
4. Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
5. Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
6. Mortality Control Checklist with selected method noted-Use the enclosed updated Mortality Control Checklist
7. Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.) Please be sure the above table is accurate and
complete. Also provide any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to
your facility.
8. Operation and Maintenance Plan
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal.
(e.g.composting,digesters,waste transfers,etc.)
As a second option to mailing paper copies of the application package, you can scan and email one signed copy of the
application and all the CAWMP items above to: [e-mail]

I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that,
if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not
included,this application package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A, and 143-215.68, any person who knowingly makes any false statement,
representation, or certification in any application may be subject to civil penalfies up to $25,000 per violation. (18 U.S.C.
Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both for
a similar offense.)
Printed Name of Signing Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all landowners should sign. If Landowner is a
corporation,signature should be by a principal executive officer of the corporation):
Name: Title: _(D W
w A
Signature: Date: -�
Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
Name: Title:
Signature: _ Date:
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number:[phone]
E-mail:[e-mail]
FORM: RENEWAL-STATE GENERAL 02/2019

_ RECEIV t)/NCbEQ/DI1VR
S Yet 9.4'4r
ROY COOPER _ AUG b 2 2019
Governor We*MICHAEL S.I2EGAN �...., ReY
Setmrnry �:"t°�"..`�"•'' _�"o'oYpnS
LINDA CULPEPPER NORTH CAROLINA `�WI
Director, Environmental Quality
February 26,2019
Doris Davis Cashatt
Cashatt Dairy RECEIVEIMCDEQIDWR
5665 Davis Country Rd
Randleman,NC 27317-7153
AUG 2.6 2019
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring State General Permit wwerauality
Dear Permittee: Regional Operations SedM
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation State Non-Discharge General Permits,
which expire on September 30, 2019. Copies of the new animal waste operation State Non-Discharge General Permits are available
at huns:Hdeg.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-quality-regional-operations/afo or by writing or calling:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number:[phone]
In order to assure your continued coverage under the State Non-Discharge General Permits, %ou must submit an application for
ermit coverage to the Division. Enclosed you will fmd a "Request for Certificate of Covers a Facilit• Currently Covered by an
Expiring State Non-Discharge General Permit." The application form must be completed. signed and returned by April 3, 2019.
Please note that You must include one III copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan iCAWMPI with the
completed and s' ned application form. A list of items included in the CAWMP can be found on page 2 of the renewal
application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to$25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the State Non-Discharge General Permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feel
free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Branch staff at 919-707-9100.
Sincerely,
Jon Risgaard,Section Chief
Animal Feeding Operations and Groundwater Section
Enclosures
cc(w/o enclosures): Winston-Salem Regional Office,Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Randolph County Soil and Water Conservation District
AFOG Section Central Files-AWC760028
North t aro}rrs aepat rrEe tof fr vronrnertta Qcra)'K 10VSJ,Dno',Water RescueD-E
err 512 N.Salsbury St_1 1636 Ma,:SeiVoe Cerater E Ra a gh,North:�aroEna 2769S-1
919.707 SWO

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
04-19-2016
This plan has been prepared for: This plan has been developed by:
CASHATT DAIRY Randy Blackwood
DAVIS CASHATT NRCS Asheboro Field Office
5763 DAVIS COUNTRY 847 Curry Dr
ROAD
RANDLEMAN, NC 27317 Asheboro, NC 27205
336-498-3563 336- 9- 449 ext 3
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I(we)understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
Signature(owner) Date
5��ZL- A,
Signature(manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S.Department of
Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By.
Technical Specialist Signature Date
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-19-2016 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
Ul Cashatt cow/heifer waste generated 2,832,408 gals/year by a 279 animal Dairy(Milk
Cow)Liquid Manure Slurry operation.This production facility has waste storage
capacities of approximately 120 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast 19401
Incorporated 26456
Injected 29984
Irrigated 17638
Max. Avail. Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Volume Volume Surplus/
PAN(lbs) * Applied (lbs) Deficit(lbs) Applied(Gallons) Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1 19,401 36226 -16,825 5,288,608 -2,456,200
This plan includes a User Defined Source to determine the total pounds of PAN in lieu
of NRCS Standard values. Refer to North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service publication AG-439-42
entitled"Soil Facts: Use of On-Farm Records for Modifying a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan"for
guidance on using on-farm records to develop a User Defined Source.
-------- -----------------------------------
Note: In source ID, S means standard source,U means user defined source.
*Max.Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s)identified in the plan for this source.
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-19-2016 Source Page 1 of 1

Narrative
This dairy milks 193 cows and keeps approximately 86 replacement heifers. There is an existing waste
storage pond with 120 day storage capacity for all waste produced plus runoff from lots and roofs. There
is also an unroofed concrete storage area that has capacity for approximately 21 -30 days of storage.
Amendment 2/2/2007.
Starting in 2006,operation is serving as a dry lot for aproximately 50 dry heifers. All milk cows and
milking operations have moved to the Hollingsworth dairy. Piedmont Triad Water Authority(PTWA)
r-o-w bisects current waste storage pond. Matter has not been settled in court. WSP may be cleaned out
and breached in the 2007/2008 calendar period. When/if this occurs the dairy will no longer be
permitted. The volume calculations based on full operational capacity have been continued to maintain
adequate land for waste application.
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the 193 cows and 86 heifers. The
amount of PAN has been captured under one user defined source(279 Cashatt cow/heifer). The 279
Cashatt cow/heifer supplies the same amount of nutrients as the standard sources of 193 Dairy Milk Cow
and 86 heifers. The amount of PAN generated is based on the waste samples supplied by the producer.
The highest waste samples were used to develop the amount of waste produced. This source accounts for
the excess rainfall on structure, feedlot,and parlor water.
Amount of Waste Produced Per Year(gallons, cubic ft,tons, etc.)
193 milking cows x 14.6(gal/day/cow)waste/year x 365 (number of days)x 83 (20/24)(%confinement
time)= 853,653 gallons of waste per year.
86 dry cows x 10.4(gal/day/cow)waste/animal year x 365 (number of days0 x 17 (4/24)(%confinement
time)=55,498 gallons of waste/year.
Excess Rainfall on Structure/Feedlot, and parlor water:
Drainage area 19,666 sq.ft., 1 day CN 98,25 yr-24 hr storm=6 inches,Runoff=5.76,Undiverted
Runoff: 1,923,355 gallons/year. TOTAL AMOUNT OF WASTE: 2,832,506 GALLONS OF
WASTE/YEAR
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN(PAN)PRODUCED PER YEAR
193 ANIMALS X 76 LBS.PAN/HEAD CAPACITY/YEAR= 14,668 LBS.PAN/YEAR
86 ANIMALS X 55 LBS PAN/HEAD CAPACITY/YEAR=4,730 LBS.PAN/YEAR
TOTAL PAN= 19,398
PAN CALCULATED USING THE NCDA TEST REPORTS HAS TOTAL PAN OF 19,401 LBS.
PAN/YEAR
Small grain silage is used in rotation to represent the use of Wheat and/or Barley silage followed by corn
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-19-2016 Narrative Page 1 of 2

Narrative
silage.
Tract 2056 F1 alfalfa hay due to high residual nitrogen by the crop no waste will be applied to this field
and therefore not part of this waste plan.
Amendment for 1/4/2010; Re: Field 1 on tract 2056
Starting 12/2009 the alfalfa will be tilled under and small grain silage(oats)will be planted, followed by
corn silage in the spring. Because no waste has previously been applied the PLAT rating is low for this
field.
PLAT run 2/2/2007,no fields rated as High.
Amendment for 1/4/2010; Re: Field 1 on tract 2056
Amended 4/19/2016 -RDB
New maps created for all land in the CNMP utilizing 2014 NAIP imagery. Several field acres changed
due to boundary changes and/or altered land use.
Updated PLAT using newest soil sampes taken on 10/26/2015.
Added tract 9554
All fields have same crop rotations.
---------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ----
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-19-2016 Narrative Page 2 of 2

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic
Yield estimates are also provided for each crop,as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index(LI)
and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool(PLAT)Rating are also provided for each field,where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High,any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the
harvested plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT
Rating should receive no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be
recommended in accordance with North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of
P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Total Useable Plat P
Removal
A Applied
Tract Field Acres Acres Rating Li Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (lbs/acre) (lbs/acre)
11807 1 5.70 5.70 Medium 10.0 Mecklenburg Small Grain,Silage 8.3 Tons 45 N/A
Com,Silage 17.5 Tonsi 60 N/A
11807 2 12.70 12.70 Medium 10.0 Wynott Small Grain,Silage 6.1 Tons 33 N/A
Corn,Silage 10.4 Tons 35 N/A
2012 1 5.50 5.501 Medium 15.0 Mecklenburg Small Grain,Silage 7.8 Tons 42 N/A
Com,Silage 16.5 Tons 56 N/A
2012 2 9.60 9.60 Medium 15.0 Wynott Small Grain,Silage 6.1 Tons 33 N/A
Com,Silage 10.4 Tons 35 N/A
2042 1 4.90 4.901 Low 10.0 Wynott Small Grain,Silage 6.4 Tons 35 N/A
Com,Silage 11.0 Tons 37 N/A
2042 2 10.1C 10.10 Low 10.0 Mecklenburg Small Grain,Silage 8.3 Tons 45 N/A
Com,Silage 17.5 Tons 60 N/A
2056 1 19.70 19.701 Medium 10.0 Mecklenburg Small Grain,Silage 8.3 Tons 45 N/A
Com,Silage 17.5 Tons 60 N/A
2065 1 15.70 15.70 Medium 10.0 Mecklenburg Small Grain,Silage 8.3 Tons 45 N/A
Com,Silage 17.5 Tons 60 N/A
2065 2 6.60 6.6q Medium 10.0 1 Wynott Small Grain,Silage 6.4 Tons 35 N/A
Corn,Silage 11.0 Tons 37 N/A
2065 3 1.50 1.5C Low 10.0 Wynott Small Grain,Silage 6.7 Tons 36 N/A
Corn,Silage 11.4 Tons 39 N/A
2065 4 5.20 5.201 Low 10.01 Mecklenburg Small Grain,Silage 8.6 Tons 46 N/A
Com,Silage 18.0 Tons 61 N/A
2065 5 2.90 2.90 Low 10.0 Mecklenburg Small Grain,Silage 8.3 Tons 45 N/A
Com,Silage 17.5 Tons 60 N/A
2065 6 0.50 0.501 Low 10.0 Wynott Small Grain,Silage 6.4 Tons 35 N/A
Com,Silage 11.0 Tons 37 N/A
2286 1 1 14.40 14.40 Medium 10.0 Wynott Small Grain,Silage 6.4 Tons 35 N/A
Corn,Silage 11.0 Tons 37 N/A
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 4/19/2016
PCs Page 1 of 2
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Total Useable Plat P205
Removal Applied
Tract Field Acres Acres Rating LI Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (Ibs/acre) (lbs/acre)
2286 2 10.60 10.60 Medium 10.0 Mecklenburg Small Grain,Silage 8.3 Tons 45 N/A
Corn,Silage 17.5 Tong 60 N/A
9554 1 29AC 29.10 Medium 9.0 Wynott Small Grain,Silage 6.4 Tons 35 N/A
Com,Silage 11.0 Tons 37 LN/A
PLAN TOTALS: 154.70 154.70
LI Potential Leaching Technical Guidance
<2 Low potential to contribute to soluble None
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>=2& Moderate potential to contribute to Nutrient Management(590)should be planned.
<= 10 soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble Nutrient Management(590)should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
nutrient leaching below the root zone. the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10 considered. Examples are Cover Crops(340)to scavenge nutrients,Sod-Based Rotations
(328),Long-Term No-Till(778),and edge-of-field practices such as Filter Strips(393)and
Riparian Forest Buffers(391).
PLATIndex Rating P Management Recommendation
0-25 Low No adjustment needed;N based application
25-50 Medium No adjustment needed;N based application
51 - 100 High Application limited to crop P removal
> 100 Very High Starter P application only
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 4/19/2016
PCs Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown,their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products,commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table Year i
Nitrogen Comm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (Ibs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. IMO
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
11807 1 Ul Mecklenburg 5.70 5.70 Small Grain,Silage 8.3 Tons 9/1-3/31 92 0 0 Broad. 92 13.43 0.00 76.56 0.00
11807 1 Ul Mecklenburg 5.70 5.70 Corn,Silage 17.5 2/15-6/30 191 0 0 Broad. 191 27.88 0.001 158.94 0.00
11807 2 Ul Wynott 12.70 12.70 Small Grain,Silage 6.1 Tons 9/1-3/31 68 0 0 Broad. 68 9.93 0.00 126.08 0.00
11807 2 Ul Wynott 1 12.70 12.70 Com,Silage 10.4 2/15-6/30 113 0 0 Broad. 113 16.50 0.00 209.51 0.00
2012 1 Ul Mecklenburg 5.50 5.50 Small Grain,Silage 7.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 87 0 0 Broad. 87 12.70 0.00 69.86 0.00
2012 1 Ul Mecklenburg 5.50 5.50 Corn,Silage 16.5 2/15-6/30 180 0 0 Broad. 180 26.28 0.00 144.53 0.00
2012 2 Ul Wynott 9.60 9.60 Small Grain,Silage 6.1 Tons 9/1-3/31 68 0 0 Broad. 68 9.93 0.00 95.30 0.00
2012 2 Ul Wynott 9.60 9.60 Corn,Silage 10.4 2/15-6/30 113 0 0 Broad. 113 16.50 0.00 158.37 0.00
2042 1 U1 Wynott 4.90 4.90 Small Grain,Silage 6.4 Tons 9/1-3/31 71 0 0 Broad. 71 10.37 0.00 50.79 0.0
2042 1 Ul Wynott 4.90 4.90 Corn,Silage 11.0 2/15-6/30 120 0 0 Broad. 120 17.52 0.00 85.84 0.00
2042 2 Ul Mecklenburg 10.10 10.10 Small Grain,Silage 8.3 Tons 9/1-3/31 92 0 0 Broad. 92 13.43 0.00 135.66 0.00
2042 2 Ill Mecklenburg 10.10 10.10 Com,Silage 17.5 2/15-6/30 191 0 0 Broad. 191 27.88 0.00 281.63 0.00
2056 1 Ul Mecklenburg 19.70 19.70 Small Grain,Silage 8.3 Tons 9/1-3/31 92 0 0 Broad. 92 13.43 0.00 264.59 0.00
2056 1 Ul Mecklenburg 19.70 19.70 Com,Silage 17.5 2/15-6/30 191 0 0 Broad. 191 27.88 0.00 549.32 0.00
2065 1 Ul Mecklenburg 15.70 15.70 Small Grain,Silage 8.3 Tons 9/1-3/31 92 0 0 Broad. 92 13.43 0.00 210.87 0.00
2065 1 1 U1 Mecklenburg 1 15.70 1"5.70 Com,Silage 1 17.5 1 2/15-6/30 1 191 1 0 0 Broad.1 191 27.88 0.00 437.781 0.00
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:4/19/2016 WUT Page 1 of 2

Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (Ibs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied -Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (]bs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
2065 2 Ul Wynott 6.60 6.60 Small Grain,Silage 6.4 Tons 9/1-3/31 71 0 0 Broad. 71 10.37 0.00 68.41 0.00
2065 2 U1 Wynott 6.60 6.60 Corn,Silage 11.0 2/15-6/30 120 0 0 Broad. 120 17.52 0.001 115.63 0.00
2065 3 Ul Wynott 1.50 1.50 Small Grain,Silage 6.7 Tons 9/1-3/31 74 0 0 Broad. 74 10.80 0.00 16.21 0.00
2065 3 UI Wynott 1.50 1.50 Com,Silage 11.4 2/15-6/30 124 0 0 Broad. 124 18.10 0.00 27.15 0.00
2065 4 Ul Mecklenburg 5.20 5.20 Small Grain,Silage 8.6 Tons 9/1-3/31 95 0 0 Broad. 95 13.87 0.00 72.12 0.0(
2065 4 U1 Mecklenburg 5.20 5.20 Corn,Silage 18.0 2/15-6/30 196 0 0 Broad. 196 28.61 0.00 148.79 0.00
2065 5 Ul Mecklenburg 2.90 2.90 Small Grain,Silage 8.3 Tons 9/1-3/31 92 0 0 Broad. 92 13.43 0.00 38.95 0.00
2065 5 U1 Mecklenburg 2.90 2.90 Com,Silage 17.5 2/15-6/30 191 0 0 Broad. 191 27.88 0.00 80.86 0.00
2065 6 U1 Wynott 0.50 0.50 Small Grain,Silage 6.4 Tons 9/1-3/31 71 0 0 Broad. 71 10.37 0.00 5.18 0.00
2065 6 UI Wynott 0.50 0,50 Com,Silage 11.0 2/15-6/30 120 0 0 Broad. 120 17.52 0.00 8.76 0.00
2286 1 U1 Wynott 14.40 14.40 Small Grain,Silage 6.4 Tons 9/1-3/31 71 0 0 Broad. 71 10.37 0.00 149.26 0.00
2286 1 U1 Wynott 14.40 14.40 Corn,Silage 11.0 2/15-6/30 120 0 0 Broad. 120 17.52 0.001 252.27 0.00
2286 2 Ul Mecklenburg 10.60 10.60 Small Grain,Silage 8.3 Tons 9/1-3/31 92 0 0 Broad. 92 13.43 0.00 142.37 0.00
2286 2 U1 Mecklenburg 10.60 10.60 Corn,Silage 17.5 2115-6/30 191 0 0 Broad. 191 27.88 0.00 295.57 0.00
9554 1 Ul Wynott 29.10 29.10 Small Grain,Silage 6.4 Tons 9/1-3/31 71 0 0 Broad. 71 10.37 0.00 301.63 0.01
9554 1 Ul Wynott 29.10 29.10 Corn,Silage 11.0 2/15-6/30 120 0 1 0 1 Broad.1 120 17.52 0.00 509.80 0.00
Total Applied,1000 gallons 5,288.61
Total Produced,1000 gallons 2,832.41
Balance,1000 gallons -2,456.20
Total Applied,tons 0.00
Total Produced,tons 0.00
Balance,tons 0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column,-symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 2. Symbol*means user entered data.
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:4/19/2016 WUT Page 2 of 2

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient
management plan developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops
for each year of the plan. Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements and soil test results. The quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity
of other nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other
byproducts are utilized to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the
application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of
this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations,additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources
may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 0 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 11807 1 Req'd Nutrients 92 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 5.70 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Mecklenburg Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.3 Tons 11-04-15 Manure 92 10 25 6 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 45 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 10 25 6 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 11807 2 Req'd Nutrients 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 12.70 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Wynott Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 6.1 Tons 11-04-15 Manure 68 7 18 5 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 33 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 7 18 5 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2012 l Req'd Nutrients 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Acres I App.Period 5.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Mecklenburg Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 7.8Tons 11-04-15 Manure 87 9 24 6 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 42 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 9 24 6 0 0 0 -1
Tract Field 2012 2 Req'd Nutrients 68 10 50 0 0 0 0 1
Acres I App.Period 9.60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Wynott Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 6.1 Tons 11-04-15 Manure 68 7 181 51 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 33 lbs/ac. Medium I BALANCE 0 -3 -32 5 0 0 0 -1
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/19/2016 NMR Page 1 of 7

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 0 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 2042 1 Req'd Nutrients 71 0 10 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 4.90 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Wynott Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 6.4 Tons 11-04-15 Manure 71 8 19 5 0 0 0 0
P Removal I Rating 35 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 8 9 51 0 0 0 -1
Tract Field 2042 2 Req'd Nutrients 92 20 40 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 10.10 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Mecklenburg Residual 0 0 0 0 0 01 01 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.3 Tons 11-04-15 Manure 92 10 25 6 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 45 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -10 -15 6 0 0 0 -1
Tract Field 2056 1 Req'd Nutrients 92 0 60 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 19.70 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Mecklenburg Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.3 Tons 11-04-15 Manure 92 10 25 61 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 45 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 10 -35 6 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2065 1 Req'd Nutrients 92 0 30 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 15.70 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Mecklenburg Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.3 Tons 11-04-15 Manure 92 10 25 6 0 0 01 0
P Removal Rating 45 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 10 -5 6 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2065 2 Req'd Nutrients 71 0 70 0 0 0 0 1
Acres I App.Period 6.60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Wynott Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 6.4 Tons 11-04-15 Manure 71 8 19 5 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 35 lbs/ac. Medium I BALANCE 0 8 -51 5 0 0 0 -1
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/19/2016 NMR Page 2 of 7

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 0 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 2065 3 Req'd Nutrients 74 0 70 0 0 0 0 1
Acres I App.Period 1.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Wynott Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 6.7 Tons 11-04-15 Manure 74 8 20 51 0 0 0 0
P Removal I Rating 36 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 01 8 -50 5 0 0 0 -1
Tract Field 2065 4 Req'd Nutrients 95 10 80 0 0 0 0 1
Acres I App.Period 5.20 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Mecklenburg Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.6 Tons 11-04-15 Manure 95 10 26 6 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 46 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 -54 6 0 0 0 -1
Tract Field 2065 5 Req'd Nutrients 92 10 80 0 0 0 0 ]
Acres I App.Period 2.90 9/1-3131 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Mecklenburg Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.3Tons 11-04-15 Manure 92 101 25 6 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 45 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 0 -55 6 0 0 0 -1
Tract Field 2065 6 Req'd Nutrients 71 10 80 0 0 0 0 1
Acres I App.Period 0.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Wynott Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 6.4Tons 11-04-15 Manure 71 8 19 5 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 35 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -2 -61 5 0 0 0 -1
Tract Field 2286 1 Req'd Nutrients 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 14.40 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Wynott Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 6A Tons 01-08-07 Manure 71 8 19 5 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 35 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 8 19 5 0 0 0 0
�"^i.i1`1V UL`LiIL�Y R
AUG 6 Z019
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/19/2016 NMR Page 3 of 7
Water G�.3ality
Regipnal opeMtons Seotloh

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 0 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (tonslA)
Tract Field 2286 2 Req'd Nutrients 92 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 10.60 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CommercialFert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Mecklenburg Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 8.3Tons I1-04-15 Manure 92 10 25 6 01 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 45 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 10 25 6 0 0 01 0
Tract Field 9554 1 Req'd Nutrients 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 29.10 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Wynott Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 6.4 Tons 11-04-15 Manure 71 8 19 5 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 35 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 8 19 5 0 0 0 0
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/19/2016 NMR Page 4 of 7

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 11807 1 Req'd Nutrients 191 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 5.70 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Com,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Mecklenburg Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 17.5 Tons 11-04-15 Manure 191 20 52 13 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 60 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 20 32 13 0 0 01 0
Tract Field 11807 2 Req'd Nutrients 113 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 12.70 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series WYnott Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 10.4 Tons 11-04-15 Manure 113 12 31 8 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 35 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 12 31 81 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2012 1 Req'd Nutrients 180 0 40 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 5.50 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Mecklenburg Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 16.5Tons 11-04-15 Manure 180 19 49 12 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 56 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 19 9 12 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2012 2 Req'd Nutrients 113 30 110 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 9.60 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Wynott Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE t Sample Date 10.4 Tons 11-04-15 Manure 113 12 31 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 35 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 -18 -79jd8 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2042 1Req'd Nutrients 120 10 50 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 4.90 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Wynott I Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
RYE I Sample Date 11.0 Tons 1 11-04-15 1 Manure 120 13 33 8 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 37 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 3 -17 8 0 0 0 0
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/19/2016 NMR Page 5 of 7

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) I (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 2042 2 Req'd Nutrients 191 40 90 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 10.10 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Mecklenburg Residual 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0
RYE j Sample Date 17.5 Tons 11-04-15 Manure 191 201 52 13 0 0 0 0
P Removal IRating 60 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -20 -38 13 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2056 1 Req'd Nutrients 191 0 120 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 19.70 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Mecklenburg Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 17.5 Tons 11-04-15 Manure 191 20 52 13 0 0 0 0
P Removal Raring 60 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 20 -68 13 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2065 1 Req'd Nutrients 191 0 90 0 0 01 0 0
Acres App.Period 15.70 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Mecklenburg Residual 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 17.5 Tons 11-04-15 Manure 191 20 52 13 0 0 0 0
P Removal I Rating 60 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 20 -38 13 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2065 2 Req'd Nutrients 120 0 130 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 6.60 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Wynott Residual 01 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 11.0 Tons 11-04-15 Manure 120 13 33 8 0 01 0 0
P Removal I Rating 37 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 13 -97 8 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2065 3 Req'd Nutrients 124 0 130 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 1.50 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Com, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Wynott Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 11.4 Tons 1 11-04-15 1 Manurel 1241 13 34 8 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 39 lbs/ac. Low I BALANCE 1 0 13 -961 81 0 0 0 0
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/19/2016 NMR Page 6 of 7

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 2065 4 Req'd Nutrients 196 30 140 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 5.20 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Mecklenburg Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 18.0 Tons 11-04-15 Manure 196 21 53 13 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 61 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -9 -87 13 0 0 01 0
Tract Field 2065 5 Req'd Nutrients 191 30 140 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 2.90 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Mecklenburg Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE t Sample Date 17.5 Tons 11-04-15 Manure 191 20 52 13 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 601bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -10 -881 13 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2065 6 Req'd Nutrients 120 30 140 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 0.50 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Wynott Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 11.0 Tons I 1-04-15 Manure 120 13 33 81 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 37 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -17 -107 8 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2286 2 Req'd Nutrients 191 0 20 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 10.60 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Mecklenburg Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 17.5Tons 11-04-15 Manure 191 20 52 13 0 0 0 0
P Removal I Rating 601bs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 20 32 13 0 0 0 0
Tract I Field 9554 1 Req'd Nutrients 120 0 50 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 29.10 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Com,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Wynott Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 11.0 Tons 1 11-04-15 Manure 120 13 331 8 01 0 0 0
IP Removal Rating 371bs/ac. IMedium I BALANCE 01 13 -171 81 01 01 01 0
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/19/2016 NMR Page 7 of 7

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate
excessive levels of copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper
can adversely affect plant growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can
be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071,respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85.
By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices,this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample.
Application of lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production .
Reguired Spit Test Values
Lime Recom.
Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-1 Copper Recommendation Zn-1 Zinc Recommendation
11807 1 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 0.0 479 None 582 None
11807 1 Corn,Silage 6.3 0.0 479 None 582 None
11807 2 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 0.0 266 None 504 None
11807 2 Corn,Silage 6.3 0.0 266 None 504 None
2012 1 Small Grain,Silage 5.4 1.1 151 None 162 None
2012 1 Corn,Silage 5.4 0.0 151 None 162 None
2012 2 Small Grain,Silage 5.2 1.2 95 None 108 None
2012 2 Corn,Silage 5.2 0.0 95 None 108 None
2042 1 Small Grain,Silage 5.5 0.9 112 None 161 None
2042 1 Corn,Silage 5.5 0.0 112 None 161 None
2042 2 Small Grain,Silage 5.4 1.1 131 None 162 None
2042 2 Corn,Silage 5.4 0.0 131 None 162 None
2056 1 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 0.0 138 None 147 None
2056 1 Corn,Silage 6.3 0.0 138 None 147 None
2065 1 Small Grain,Silage 6.0 0.0 183 None 455 None
2065 l Corn,Silage 6.0 0.0 183 None 455 None
2065 2 Small Grain,Silage 5.5 0.8 237 None 303 None
2065 2 Corn,Silage 5.5 0.0 237 None 303 None
2065 3 Small Grain,Silage 5.5 0.8 237 None 303 None
2065 3 Corn,Silage 5.5 0.0 237 None 303 None
2065 1 4 Small Grain,Silage 5.7 1 0.61 222 None 233 None
2065_1 4 Co.,Silage 5.7 1 0.01 222 None 233 None
- ----------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-19-2016 STV Page 1 of 2

ReauiredSail Test Values
Lime Recom.
Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-1 Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation
2065 5 Small Grain,Silage 5.7 0.6 222 None 233 None
2065 5 Corn,Silage 5.7 0.0 222 None 233 None
2065 6 Small Grain,Silage 5.7 0.6 222 None 233 None
2065 6 Corn,Silage 5.7 0.0 222 None 233 None
2286 1 Small Grain,Silage 6.4 0.0 520 None 1032 None
2286 2 Small Grain,Silage 6.3 0.0 479 None 582 None
2286 2 Corn,Silage 6.3 0.0 479 None 582 None
9554 1 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.01 190 1 None 286 None
9554 1 1 Corn,Silage 6.2 0.01 190 1 None 286 None
---- -- -----------------------------------------
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-19-2016 STV Page 2 of 2

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity,this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Table Waste Stora e Ca vacit ,
Source Name I Cashatt cow/heifer Design Storage Capacity(Days)
Start Date 6/1 120
Plan Year Month Available Storage Capacity(Days)
1 1 89
1 2 61
1 3 30
1 4 120
1 5 120
1 6 90
1 7 59
1 8 28
1 9 69
1 10 120
1 11 90
1 12 120
*Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
- ---------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-19-2016 Capacity Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:4/19/2016 Specification Page 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:4/19/2016 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over-spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns,leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre-plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
---------------- ----- --- -- --- - - ------- ----- - -
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:4/19/2016 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate-determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
716164 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:4/19/2016 Specification Page 4

Operator: Cashatt Dairy Conservation Planning Map N
Owner: same Map use: Conservation Planning w
Farm(s) -4145 Tract(sl-2286 a
1 inch=400 feet USDA
Randolph,NC-SWCD 0 200 400
Date PreEared:4/14/2016 Feet
Prepared by:Randy Blackwood
Trait 2065,
,2.9
fact 2065
} e
1 J
LL
Z a
_ O Q
QRandleman Lake
J,71 �
Tract 2286
Traci 2286 2
Tract 54 C!: ;sr 1 iO:2 at
UL
1 �g 14.4 at
a
M
Tract2056
1
19.7 at
Fields
l3 headquarters
C3cropland
riparian buffer
hayland
J pastureland �•
13 forestland `
0i$uc a

Operator: Cashatt Dairy Conservation Planning Map N
Owner: same Map use: Conservation Planning w
Farm(s) -4145 Tract(s) -2286 5
1 inch=400 feet USDA
Randolph,NC-SWCD 0 200 400
Date Prepared:4/14/2016 Feet
Prepared by:Randy Blackwood
WfC 7. 'r WtC
v f
°+�a ©: au McC2
o �
McC2
' .7
a IOU
r Q
W Randleman Lake
� o
a
eC2
G
"�•'!�� � J •
i.:.•::.:'.;•:+r'�i�'.MiY.^1�::{;.j�� •:_:.•�.ti;\.•;:.;::.:'.':•:.':.':�'..':•:..�'.';•.�� ram.
N.
"`�+.tee .. ....• .. �.
1
?� •�=i:'-':}r.'••':�i::;:.:�:ii-�t:%ir:.'••i?::7._:.:c��[riir::.,��''v.`..�. _.i'
N
0.4-�ac:•::::�:. - of
WvC2
Cute
Fields
headquarters :•::::::::.:::::::: .:: :.:..a::•.
cropland
riparian buffer t::;:.:':::;•:`.=::' ::::: :'^,
pastureland ``�., :;:.:•::;:•:::^. ;?•::;:' g c
( forestland ° D"

Operator: Cashatt Dairy Conservation Planning Map N
Owner: WFMY News Map use: Conservation Planning W
4,
Farm s -4199 4259 3648 Tract s -2012 2065 2042 5
1 inch 400 feet USDA
Randolph,NC-SWCD 0 200 400
Date Pmared:4/14/2016 Tliiiiiiii@ Feet
Prepared by:Randy Blackwood
V •r
i
' r j • •A W r' -
I, 3cTr#t200,'
_ a
57 ac Tract 2065
11.2 av 12:7 ac
•Tract 2012' 1;1�ac
• 2
Tract 2012. 9 6zac
5.5'ac
f , Tract 2042:, �' €,_ ;:c
`! 4 9 ac r f�`
Tract
r Tract2042
ract
4
4.9 a Tract 2065•
15.7'aC .
Tract2065
L
y 66g
Tract 2tiF,5 42andleman Lr
. .,;.
rain
r
l ssr 6
Fields
headquarters
sue; cropland -
�� riparian buffer Tract 2065
hayland 4 •
.' ` 5.2
�( pastureland
3'ract 2065
forestiand 5
V
2.9.ec i

Operator: Cashatt Dairy Conservation Planning Map N
Owner: WFMY News ...,.,. .,.,..zrvation Planning W
4—
Fann(s)-4199,4259, 3648 Tracts -2012, 2065, 2042 5
1 inch USDA
400 feet
Randolph,NC-SWCD 0 200 400
Date Prepared:4/14/2016 MiiiiiRFed
Prepared by:Randy Blackwood
a J J J a
WvC2 % J J J J �:�•
4
a
JJ ? J JJ a s J J JJ -J J J � ..: .r �a�d WpE
C
a JJ J .7 a JJ J J JJ J ,7 J JJ JJ JJ a ••�,,r�,�2Qf5. :, ,
tia J J JaJa J ' `3a J J a J3J� J a JJJ+ , a'` < ':kr`:'`.i'•:: •- !
J a J a J J a J PE
J J J J 7 ati3 J J , .'.�:F.•___;�r::: a.•:;.•::.•:,.::}:.•;;::ci._,r::. ."".'`, j
1065 1-
I 57ac
�.1.4f:211
ac -
:..
J J J Tiiact20.42i:•'.';:::::; ::.,•'•:::;::.•;:: .::.`�.: V
j - J 9J J J
t•�'
e:::.}:::::} };`::is F:_•.;;;:.?..ca . .. .. •....::
t JWPC
J
V J
Y
t J
J J
J
k
J
- J _
a
J4
J
:'15:7:
v
J
J
- � J
-
�
V a a.:��� - J •7 J
� J
J
J J J
1 t�'•:` J J J J 7 J
• aC�(•'
J
i4C ';a J ,J a..::'';:...::'.:;ii.?}:..:;:. Ja J J
.:...:.•.: `.:.. J a
J J
E: t
J J �t,: J J • � J
� a J J° J a t° ••' �i'd'tt'•,.•♦• ',,,J.7 JJ "; a J J JJ J a
J a Ja a _ •,..J' •: .:::.•:;:•. ., . '• Ja,a �.� y J
J-th ae J J
Randleman La
Rand ke.
a J JJ' a p•J ;) J al: -�;.' �. :5:::. 1f_�
J J t t aYt
J `7 a
Fields
.,.<: :`::? fir, �..•.,. �.� `��,.<
headquarters ., 1
WtC
':`.;•: `
t; cropland ::::::::::::.::::::,:..:.:•:::::�
riparian buffer l':: i :`': ':`;:.`.i•; % p
A.
WtC
hayland ;:::,::.;:;::4.;::;::; ;_::;`... :' j WvB2[ f
pastureland ..,:.;.:.:.::::::::::::::..:::::.c:::,•.:. .; t
1:., forestland ::`:;: .::::>.:'.''y-: J

Operator: Cashatt Dairy Conservation Planning Map N
Owner: Gary Hinshaw Map use: Conservation Planning w
+I
Farm(s) - 4259 Tract(s) - 2065 a
1 inch=400 feet U(�3 DA
Randolph,NC-SWCD 0 200 400
Date Prepared:4/14/2016 Feet
Prepared by:Randy Blackwood
77-
Tract / 'Tract 204
6.2 ac lac
10 1,ac
Tract
4.9 ac Tract 2065
'13;7ac
Tract 200
6F6 ac,-.._ - 15.7 ac
Tract 20li5 .Fe
"12J tag ��
Tract N. ILSac'
lac j Tea
6
7Yact`2U�t5 ,.-
4
5.2 ac
r� � ' Tract2065
9;ac-
a
do
o
IYact.9554 7
Fields
i3 headquarters
w
t'`'l�. cropland
C3 riparian buffer
Tract 2286
v� hayland Tract 2285 2
pastureland i 10.6 ac
14.4 ac
forestland _
0.3 tic

Operator: Cashatt Dairy Conservation Planning Map N
Owner: Gary Hinshaw Map use: Conservation Planning w
Farm ) - 4259 Tract )- 2065 S
1 inch=400 feet
Randolph,NC-SWCD 0 200 400 USDA
Date Prqmared:4/14/2016 Feet
Prepared by:Randy Blackwood
P
2
Tra 2
025 ite
-ID
0
2
10.1 a"
6S-":
.4
-o
-P
D
. 1 0 WpE
n D D 0
Ica
0
20 132
2942
i6,_
91 41C 0
0
15
Ja
0 3.
Z. �Q
-p J Q,
4W.".
D
WtC
V
o 4P
J�
-2
4P 0 Q
Q 9
0
47, 5
t 0
W 6
lo WVB2
0
0 V­
Po -P
'Ds 6 N,,>ac
P
-P 0
M!p
0
0
BZ J °j 0
0
WVC2
.7
f
m
Fields
p
%:.. . , (C
headquarters _P
4P
cropland ......
kk
Z
riparian buffer
4P
ha land
pastureland
forestland

Operator: Casnatt Dairy Conservation Planning Map N
Owner: Vickie Ellis Map use: Conservation Plannin€ w
Farm(s) -3602 Tract(s) -2056 5
1 inch=400 feet USDA
Randolph,N C-SWCD 0 200 400
Date Prcnared:4/14/2016
Feet
Prepared by:Randy Blackwood
Randlemanj-ake i
1�
Tract 2286
liy��M.aP�MpA
2R
Tract 2286 •, _�-�
14.4 ae "�
ti
y
r
ti
Tract2056
1
19.7 ac
OTi `
l.S�a
Fields
headquarters
cropland
riparian buffer
hayland an Lake
pastureland
C forestland

N
Operator: Cashatt Dairy Conservation Planning Map
Owner: Vickie Ellis ap use: Conservation Planning w
Farm(s) -3602 Tracts -2056 S
1 inch=400 feet ��VDJ�
Randolph,NC-SWCD 0 200 400
Date Prepared:4/14/2016 Feet
Prepared by:Randy Blackwood
t f Randleman Lake 1
r 0
��. Me132
'"6'3 e
:..:..... �ka�t
f
McC2 +
r E
.r
/ RVA
f R►rA
vC2
Fields ! i
C3 headquarters
03; cropland J�--• �_ `_ l y f
CG riparian buffer
f-"- hayland an Lake
McC2
pastureland //i �• WpE WpE
forestland

N
Operator: Cashatt Dairy Conservation Planning Map
Owner: Kay Davis Map use: Conservation Planning w F
Farms) - 8426 Tract(s) - 11807 5
1 inch=400 feet _USDA
Randolph,NC-SWCD 0 200 400
Date Prepared:4/14/2016 Feet
Prepared by:Randy Blackwood
/3 ,A&
1 J
� m
Tract;.
6.1.ac
' I
r`Tract 1180.7
5:7 ac
Tract 11807 �'��
-.:�
TracE:-2
2,
9.6 ac
f r act 2U12 GIII
ac
Tract 0,42
ir
z
Tract 2042
14.1ac l}.h.tiC
Fields,
headquarters
cropland
� .
riparian buffer '
hayland
Tract 20:65
pastureland
03 forestland

Operator: Cashatt Dairy Conservation Planning Map N
Owner: Kay Davis , —...,.:rvation Plan— W
Fad s) - 8426 Tract(s) - 11807 S
1 inch=400 feet ����
Randolph,NC-SWCD 0 200 400 _
Date Prepared:4/14/2016 Tsiiiiia Feet
Prepared by:Randy Blackwood
T J- 2 RvA 1 .,
a w
i
IS
WtB t f WFB
J J t
ba': '•'::::.
WpE
J }i WpE
fir./^ .,• J J
,...-
J J ` RvA
J •:J.` y7 � J .J ,}.::j[Tf!•:1;;.::ii::frx:�::f:-p;:c:..C"�:•`:''=iir:;:j� :`..t.'.
J �J J J J .�a;J ~ - 71P12A •+, Yam``•....
J WtC
' J J ,7 J J 3 J J aCti<f1;>3R7; me r��
Q J', -)J1?.27aCa J J J J J •;`''1~: ::."Jr "f;i7$J': \�6
J ,� J,} J 7 '•�Y f t
Mac
.:
•:tried;2{is��;;`:`?;:;•`:.•:•'::�:;��.��'':� �.::::.:-:••:•.:-"•:r• -
J
McB2
J J
• � J J J J .3
04.2
Ja J '' O JJ J W C
J•
J D J J
J Mac
J*7 J
7 illa32
; WpE
Fields :.:•.` ::' J ti3 ,� J �3� r -_
headquarters `�' :;'; J J J°J J ' I RvA f
{ cropland y.7J '' ' Jl �a�' J VIIvC27`
riparian buffer J J
� v 1 - •� J
hayland a ° > .; J ,a ,., w„ (WVW
pastureland
forestland - Wtc
y J -'''� WvB2

Operator: Cashatt Dairy Conservation Planning Map N
4,
Owner: same r se: Conservation Planning W
Farms) -9154 Tract(s)-9554 a
1 inch=400 feet
Randolph,NC-SWCD 0 200 400 USDA
H
Date Prepared:4/14/2016 Feet
Prepared by:Randy Blackwood
'drae to 65
4 1
s 5.2 ac
1 DJ
t e J 6
ac •
6.
LU
- J
`T'ract 9554
v 'r _-
_ :F Tract 228E
.4.4 ac
V
�C
a�
dfQ
;l
0.a'uc
.1
Fields
C3 headquarters
CS,, cropland
riparian buffer
hayland
1F pastureland
forestland

Operator: Cashatt Dairy Conservation Planning Map N
Owner: same rviap use: %-unse"auun riatua
W
Farm(s) -9154 Tract(s)-9554 5
1 inch 400 feet USDA
Randolph,NC-SWCD 0 200 400
Date Prepared:4/14/2016
Feet
Prepared by:Randy Blackwood
Wtc
�. 52;a '::;:-:' Wtc
Wtc
a a a aJa .. °a a `� ° ,?a s a
a J Ja :2065
J a J a J aJa J a , a_a �• 6.:-1
J a s V t`
D� a
Wv
'o J a J a ° a J a J a `` y l
a J a L
�t Meaa,? a J a as J a a a as a
a a J a J
�•� ti Y vat* J a Ja J a �� a aaJ� � J`J J as a J LL
a J a J a s Y a s J ug
a o v .a ..`: :.-:i ... ;':•.• a a J a a a
a J a J a- :.:;.:__;,..::.:.`..;.:• J a_a J J ° J J a a J J a-a� f rri o
JaaJ� d ° y aJa ..: '� � JaaJaJa ,? aaJaa J 'aJaa ...� l
a s aJa � a s J a s J J a J f
va J a J
a.v a
_ a
J l 1
f a a
a a J ���y,,�
a 1
Y1i'Y
1
J
a
a a J a rae�.2$5.•• a C
- J
a ' a
a
t a a a, J a
a
t J
a a
J
a C-
1
J
J a
I t.
a
/ a
l
., WpEv
F
Fields
(�3 headquarters
45 cropland McC2
C3 riparian buffer WvC2
hayland.
pastureland
forestland 1

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best)and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20.For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed.Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25"in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 2001b/ac. N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production;reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 10, 11, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont,corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 121bs.nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 1201bs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn.Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production.Plant a cover crop after harvest.
774035 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-05-2007 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 2

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 10, 11, 2, 3,4, 5, 7, 8, 9
Small Grain Silage,Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10%when
planting no-till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 301bs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20% for no-till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February-March. Apply 10 to 121bs. N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain.Timely management
of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
774035 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 02-05-2007 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 2

EMI ERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ 33G— 771-S0oo
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM •/�
SWCD 334,-W6—4#
NRCS 33(,— (Af. i'¢44? fxr 3
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at
the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation,this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow-possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field-actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s)that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators-action include:
1 December 18, 1996

a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems,or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage,put
in a submersible pump, and pump back to the lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals,trap or remove animals and fill holes
and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom
as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger(either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)regional office;
Phone33&-71/-.* ' After hours,emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call should
include: your name,facility,telephone number,the details of the incident from item 2 above,
the exact location of the facility,the location or direction of movement of the spill,weather
and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken, and the
seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS phone number - I -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES,phone number3g-JW- 400,1ocal SWCD office phone number3t and
local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone numbed -(,t f-yyyy �,73
4. If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off-site
2 December 18, 1996

damage.
a. Contractors Name: Al,kr i 4x
b. Contractors Address:
c. Contractors Phone: 82-V-3sa Y'
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon(MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.
a. Name: Nllw l W I-a
b. Phone: 3%, -771-Seto
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems
with release of wastes from happening again.
3 December 18, 1996

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead ■ Dairy Production Vegetative or wooded buffers;
❑ Recommended best management practices;
Good judgement and common sense
Pared lots or barn alley • Wet manure-covered surfaces /Scrape or flush daily;
surfaces d Promote drying with proper ventilation;
211 Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants,pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas • Urine; Promote drying with proper ventilation;
• Partial microbial decomposition ❑ Replace wet or manure-covered bedding
Manure dry stacks ■ Partial microbial decomposition Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
Storage tank or basin • Partial microbial decomposition, 0 Bottom or mid-level loading;
surface • Mixing-while filling; ❑ Tank covers;
• Agitation while emptying ❑ Basin surface mats of solids;
❑ Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions;
❑ Agitate only prior to manure removal;
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surfaces 0 Partial microbial decomposition, O Liquid drainage from settled solids;
■ Mixing while filling; ❑ Remove solids regularly
• , Agitation while emptying
Manure,slurry,or sludge • Agitation when spreading-, ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
spreader outlets ! Volatile gas emissions ❑ Wash residual manure from spreader after use;
❑ Proven biolo uical additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure,slurry • Volatile gas emissions while O Soil injection of slurry/sludges;
or sludge on field surfaces drying ❑ Soil incorporation within 48 hrs;
❑ Spread in thin uniform lavers for rapid drying;
❑ Proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks • Agitation of recycled lagoon liquid ❑ Flush tank covers;
while tanks are filling ❑ Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti-siphon vents
Ou'side drain collection or • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Box covers
AMOC-November 11, 1996,Page 1

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
junction boxes conveyance
Lift stations A Agitation during sump tank filling ❑ Sump tank covers
and drawdown
End of drainpipes at lagoon 0 Agitation during wastewater ❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces i Volitile gas emission; ❑ Proper lagoon liquid capacity;
0 Biological mixing; ❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures;
• Agitation ❑ Minimum surface area-to-volume ratio;
❑ Minimum agitation when pumping;
❑ Mechanical aeration;
❑ Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler nozzles • High pressure agitation; , wate on dry days with little or no wind:
■ Wind drift Minimum recommended oneratine pressure:
❑ Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface:
❑ Pump from second stage lagoon:
❑ Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition Ca"Proner disposition of carcasses
Standing water around 0 Improper drainage; 21'*'�Grade and landscape such that water drains away
facilities • Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto public 0 Poorly maintained access roads Farm access road maintenance
roads from farm access
Additional Information: Available From:
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 RuleBMP Packet NCSU,County Extension Center
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System-Lake Wheeler Road Filed Labatory;EBAE 209-95 NCSU-BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage;EBAE 103-83 NCSU-BAE
Management of Dairy Wastewater;EBAE 106-83 NCSU-BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment;EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU-BAE
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies;PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
AMOC-November 11, 1996,Page 2

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Svstems
Flush Gutters 0 Accumulation of Solids 0 Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently to
remove accumulated solids from gutters as designed;
0 Remove bridging of accumulated solids at dischav e
Lagoons and Pits 0 Crusted Solids 0 Maintain lagoons,settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6-8 inches
over more than 30%of surface.
Excessive Vegetative • Decaying vegetation 0 Maintain vegetative control along banks of lagoons
Growth and other impoundments to prevent accumulation of
decaying vegetative matter along water's edge on
impoundment's perimeter.
Feeders i Feed Spillage td' Design,operate and maintain feed systems(e.g.,
bunkers and troughs)to minimize the accumulation
DI-Ifdecaying wastage.
lean up spillage on a routine basis(e.g.,7- 10 day
interval during summer; 15-30 day interval during
winter).
Feed Storage 0 Accumulation of feed residues Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
insuring drainage away from site and/or providing
adequate containment(e.g.,covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
O 0 pr and remove or breakup accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed.
AMIC- November 11, 1996,Page I

Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Insects Site Specific Practices
Animal Holding Areas A Accumulations of animal wastes C7"Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal.
K"'Maintain fence rows and filter strips around
animal holding areas to minimize accumulations
of wastes(i.e.inspect for and remove or break up
_ accumulated solids as needed.
Dry Manure Handling ® Accumulations of animal wastes Remove spillage on a routine basis(e.g.,7-10 day
Systems interval during summer; 15-30 day interval during
winter)where manure is loaded for land application
11/RM880adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles.
Inspect for an remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed.
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service,Department of Entomology,Box 7613,North Carolina State University, Raleigh,NC
2769 5-7613
AMIC- November 11, 1996,Page 2

Version—November 26,2018
Mortality Management Methods
indicate which method(s) will be implemented.
When selecting multiple methods indicate a primary versus secondary option.
Methods other than those listed must be approved by the State Veterinarian.
Primary Secondary Routine Mortality
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours of knowledge of animal
death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water
(G.S.106-403). The bottom of the burial pit should beat least one foot above the seasonal
high water table.Attach burial location map and plan.
Landfill at municipal solid waste facility permitted by NC DEQ under GS 15A NCAC
13B .0200.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7.
Complete incineration according to 02 NCAC 52C .0102.
a A composting system approved and permitted by the NC Department of Agriculture& Con-
sumer Services Veterinary Division (attach copy of permit). If compost is distributed off-farm,
additional requirements must be met and a permit is required from NC DEQ.
a In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the
NC Department of Agriculture& Consumer Services (G.S. 106-549.70).
a a Any method which, in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian, would make possible
the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health.
(Written approval by the State Veterinarian must be attached).
® Mass Mortality Plan
Mass mortality plans are required for farms covered by an NPDES permit. These plans are
also recommended for all animal operations. This plan outlines farm-specific mortality man-
agement methods to be used for mass mortality. The NCDA&CS Veterinary Division sup-
ports a variety of emergency mortality disposal options; contact the Division for guidance.
• A catastrophic mortality disposal plan is part of the facility's CAWMP and is activated
when numbers of dead animals exceed normal mortality rates as specified by the State
Veterinarian.
• Burial must be done in accordance with NC General Statutes and NCDA&CS Veterinary
Division regulations and guidance.
• Mass burial sites are subject to additional permit conditions (refer to facility's animal
waste management system permit).
• In the event of imminent threat of a disease emergency, the State Veterinarian may enact
additional tempor procedures or measures for disposal according to G.S. 106-399.4.
ignature of Far Owner/Manager Date
Signature of Technical Specialist Date

NORTH CI�R.vLNA CAStlf\TI" -DAIR-Y ) -Rr-vNDc�L,,P} COUNTY
Ni P 6/Qe
S I-z 6 STOP-F\C,V—:
193 M I Q< M(r C o v,J S - ON LOT 2 0 N P.S/DAY
8G 17RY Covi s - OM L.o-r 4 JARS - /-o/kY
J20 DA`.s Sid2RGE
CoNcp-ETE I�OaF DRF�►NP.GE AREA — 19, �0��o SR.Fr.
I• M A N U R.0 EXCESS WAT FJ ,
A. 1J1 AN u RJ�:
�
20 HRS� �13 co�sJ(14.�0 CtAL/Cow/PAY)( z4NPsj 120 DANfs) 37, 671
-7. 48�aL/cu.fc.
83 Cows)(10, q rA /cow/bqY)( z4NraS)� 120 DAYS) _ 2,30 g cu. Fr.
`7. 48 CAL/c u•7,
( 193 cows�(5 GAt—./Gow�pAY�(I2 O bays = 15, 4 81 cu. Fr.
7.49 GAL/cu•F T.
IOTA L MAN uP..E. �' ExcESs WATeZ. = 55, 4 0 co. F-.
-f1- , OcjQ_Mj:��- iP2ECIPITATpN LESS EYAPOR�TioN 00 }PoNC SORVFlCE.
Fow C�,,-r�c��, succEssv�� MdNT}-IS - -I. 84 = PI 0.�6 ' (DEC.- AR.
Sop,-FAcE Ap•Ea of t-'- oND = 32, 400 Sq.IFT.
( 32,40o sq.T)( 0.(o(,o F-r.) = 2 i) 3 8 4

Nt'p--r'c CRrzuN*\, CASHATT ����..Y , RaNtJO�PN COUNTY
+A3P (S/98
S IZE \t4ASTC S-►0RACYE f 3Nb
IIL U N Dt\l ER,-['E.L RUNoIFF Fop- NORMAL RowoFF
Z)Ric,loACrr- ARF-A = ICJ,( )() sq.5r. ! DAY CN98 30-DAY CH 9 ..
-RA►NVALL RUNOFF
MAY - 4. 07 3. 19
rumps- 3.84 3. 01
suLY - 4.89 3. 98
Auk, - 4,59- 3.43
23, ZO(p U. fr.
25YR- 24-kR. -PREGtPtrArloPJ oN PW D SORFACE
25Y2-- 24 NQ. s`Tokrv-, Fop, Rptiur dL-F'� Co. 6.0 02, 0.50 '
SU2r'Ac-£ A2EA = 32,400 sq.rT.
(3a,400 scq.Fr.)(0.s0F7: )= I ( , z00 cu•Fr
UND,vFeTEo -Rupjor r FRAM 2SYR.- 24-HfZ. S-ro(ZM FRarA I)RAwArjt AREA
TP,Rw rit AtzEA = Iq, 666 sq.F- : DAY CA 98
25y P- 2'k HR.. S-rotzm = 6.0 " R U N O F F = 5, 7(o
)�576"A-a F-r)= 9440 co. Fr.
To-rA L 0!R.0 P Vow of E. = 12 5) (o 9 0 cu. ;-r:
vOLurnE Avnl LABL.F- To ELE.v. -78.0 = 156) 8 I � CO, FT,

User Name: Angela G. Jessup, USDA-NRCS Date: 06-09-98
Project: Davis Cashatt Dairy, Randolph C Time: 14:49:02
FILENAME: d:\projl4\randolph\cashatt\cashatt.DWG Page: 1
S I T E D E S I G N - VOLUME CALCULATIONS
PRISMOIDAL METHOD
ORIGINAL SURFACE Existing Ground
FINAL SURFACE Flat TIN Elev: 78.00
CUT COMPACTION FACTOR 0.00 %
FILL COMPACTION FACTOR 0.00 %
RAW CUT VOLUME 0.00 AC-FT
RAW FILL VOLUME 3.60 AC-FT
�3.6 AC- Fr.x43,560 cu.Fr./ac:Fr) = 15(o,E316 cu.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
LL.-_ OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
PROJECT/FARM: C AS H ATT -DA l 2Y
DATE: Au ST 10 19 q
• A 4"X 4"treated post, painted white or a 4"diameter schedule 40 PVC pipe with cap
shall be placed at the maximum liquid level at elevation 78.0 . At no time should the
effluent level rise above the maximum liquid level, which is 2.0 feet below the
settled top of dam.
• A visual inspection of the waste storage pond or lagoon will be performed at least
twice a year. The inspector should check the condition of the dam and the emergency
spillway. The inspector will need to look for signs of slope failure and seepage on the
back slope and at the toe of the dam. Also, a very close look will need to be made to
check for signs of damage due to varmint(ground hogs,muskrats, etc.)burrows. A
visual inspection should also be made after heavy rainfall events to ensure that the
structure is not experiencing erosion rills or gullies. Any problems found should be
brought to the attention of the technical specialist for repair recommendations.
• The waste storage pond or lagoon will need to be mowed twice a year. All eroded
areas shall be repaired and stabilized. Areas that do not have an adequate ground
cover shall be reseeded to provide a vegetative cover sufficient restrain erosion. The
dam and all constructed slopes will need to be fertilized annually with 500 pounds of
10-10-10 per acre or its equivalent.
• Maintain all waste handling equipment—pumping, loading, hauling, spreading, etc.—
in accordance with the manufacturers specifications.
• All waste application shall be completed in accordance with the waste utilization plan.
The waste storage pond or lagoon will be pumped at the end of each design storage
period ( 12 O days or 4_months) or as needed due to excess rainfall.
See the attached NC Agricultural Extension Service Agri-Waste Management
Publication by Dr. James C. Barker for information on sampling and testing of the
effluent.