550007_Permit Renewal Application 2019_20190410

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Animal Waste Management Systems
Request for Certification of Coverage
Facility Currently covered by an Expiring Sate Non -Discharge General Permit
On September 30, 2019, the North Carolina State Non -Discharge General Permits for Animal Waste Management Systems will
expire. As required by these perm ts, facilities that have been issued Certificates of Coverage to operate under these State
Non -Discharge General Permits must apply for renewal at least 180 days prior to their expiration date. Therefore, all applications
must be received by the Division of Water Resources by no later than April 3, 2019.
Please do not leave any question unanswered. Please verify all information and make any necessary corrections below.
Application must be signed and dated by the Permittee.
1. Farm Number: 55-0007 Certificate Of Coverage Number:
2. Facility Name: Beam Dairy
3. Landowner's Name (same as on the Waste Management Plan): John P Beam
4. Landowner's Mailing Address: 3058 Johnstown Rd
City: Cherrvville State: NC
Telephone Number: 704-435-2342 Ext. E-mail:
5. Facility's Physical Address: 3025 Johnstown Rd
City: Cherrvville State: NC
6. County where Facility is located: Lincoln
7. Farm Managers Name (if different from Landowner):
8, Farm Manager's telephone number (include area code):
9. Integrator's Name (if there is not an Integrator, write "None"):
10. Operator Name (OIC): John P. Beam Phone No.: 704-300.9641
11. Lessee's Name (if there is not a Lessee, write "None"):
12. Indicate animal operation type and number:
Current Permit:
Operations Type
Allowable Count
Cattle - Dairy Heifer
70
Cattle - Dairy Calf
100
Cattle - Dry Cow
250
Cattle - Milk Cow
1,400
Operation Types:
Swine
Cattle
Dry Poultry
Wean to Finish
Dairy Calf
Non Laying Chickens
Wean to Feeder
Dairy Heifer
Laying Chickens
Farrow to Finish
Milk Cow
Pallets
Feeder to Finish
Dry Cow
Turkeys
Farrow to Wean
Beef Stocker Calf
Turkey Pullet
Farrow to Feeder
Beef Feeder
Boar/Stud
Beef Broad Cow
Wet Poultry
Gilts
Other
Non Laying Pullet
Other
Layers
AWC550007
Zip: 28021-9058
Zip: 280219058
OIC #: 20915
Other Tvues
Horses - Horses
Horses - Other
Sheep- Sheep
Sheep - Other

13. Waste Treatment and Storage Lagoons (Verify the following information is accurate and complete. Make all necessary
corrections and provide missing data.)
Structure
Name
Estimated
Date
Built
Liner Type -
(Clay, Synthetic,
Unknown)
Capacity
(Cubic Feet)
Estimated
Surface Area
(Square Feet)
Design
Freeboard
'Redline"
(Inches)
ILOWER
Iggo
I .q
I"�
24.00
2UPPER
1-Vq�
2- 05.Ot7
3%
24.00
3-FIELD
32.--_ -
24.00
Mail one (1) copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with this completed and signed application
as required by NC General Statutes 143-215.IOC(d) to the address below.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
1. The most recent Waste Utilization Plan (WUP), signed by the owner and a certified technical suecialist containing:
a. The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation, injection, etc.)
b. A map of every field used for land application (for example: irrigation map)
c. The soil series present on every land application field
d. The crops grown on every land application field
e. The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP
I. The maximum PAN to be applied to every land application field
g. The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
h. The required NRCS Standard specifications
2. A site map/schematic
3. Emergency Action Plan
4. Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
5. Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
6. Mortality Control Checklist with selected method noted - Use the enclosed updated Mortality Control Checklist
7. Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.) Please be sure the above table is accurate and
complete. Also provide any site evaluations. wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to
your facility.
8. Operation and Maintenance Plan
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal.
(e.g. composting, digesters, waste transfers, etc.)
As a second option to mailing paper copies of the application package, you can scan and email one signed copy of the
application and all the CAWMP items above to: 20191'ermitRenewalancdenr.gov

I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that,
if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not
included, this application package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143.215.6A and 143-215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false statement,
representation, or certification in any application may be subject to civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation. (18 U.S.C.
Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both for
a similar offense,) . _,
Printed Name of Signing Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all landowners should sign. If Landowner is a
corporation, signature should be by a principal executive officer of the corporation):
Name: JU/(nitwi 1� �e(" ,V� Title: DIV)ILyt
Signature: V ` '� Date: 3� ��
Name:
Signature:
Name:
Signature:
Title:
Date:
Title:
Date:
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
FORM: RENEWAL -STATE GENERAL 02/2019

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Sec rrary
LINDA CULPEPPER
oirMor
NORTH CAROLINA
Enrfronmental Quality
February 26, 2019
John P Beam
Beam Dairy
3058 Johnstown Rd
Chenyville, NC 28021-9058
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring State General Permit
Dear Pennittee:
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation State Non -Discharge General Permits,
which expire on September 30, 2019. Copies of the new animal waste operation State Non -Discharge General Permits are available
at https://dea.nc.eov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-quality-reeional-operations/afo or by writing or calling:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
In order to assure Your continued coverage
under
the State Non -Discharge General Permits. you must submit an application for
permit coverage to the Division Enclosed
you will find a "Request for Certificate of Coverage Facility
Currently Covered by an
Expiring State Non -Discharge General Permit."
The
application form must be completed, signed and
returned by April 3. 2019.
Please note that you must include one
(1) copy
of the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) with the
completed and signed application form.
A list
of items included in the CAWMP can be found
on page 2 of the renewal
application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the State Non -Discharge General Permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feel
free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Branch staff at 919.707.9100.
Sincerely,
Ate,
Jon Risgaard, Section Chief
Animal Feeding Operations and Groundwater Section
Enclosures
cc (w/o enclosures): Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Lincoln County Soil and Water Conservation District
AFOG Section Central Files - AWC550007
No rth Ca rpina Daps nmant of Env ron m antal Qu a ty I D Nson of Water aesou roes
nE e 512 N.Soisbury 9t, 11938 Me i Servoe Can%r I9a'egh, No rth Caro'.n a 27699-1696
`�./� 919.707.9D00

This plan has been prepared for:
Seam Dairy
John Beam
3058 Johnstown Rd
Cherryville, NC 28021
704-300-9642
Beam Dairy
11128/2018
This plan has been developed by:
NCDA&CS DSWC
Michael Shepherd
191 S. Main St
Mocksville, NC 27028
336-940-8901
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
OwnertManagerlProducer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
e �, i - - - - /-(/
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S.Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
Technical Specialist Signature Date

Beam Dairy
11 /28/2018
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Narrative:
This waste management plan update is to address the expansion of the milk cow herd population to
1,400. The operation consists of three barn lots where all 1,400 milk cows and 70 heifers are
confined 100% of time. Waste and bedding from these three barns are scraped into a pit where all
bedding is separated out through a solid separator to be reused and then waste is pumped into a
waste storage pond. Waste is then contained between three waste storage ponds. Two of the
waste ponds are located next to the barns and a third waste pond is located in an application field.
All three waste ponds are interconnected by pipes and waste can be transferred between ponds by
pumps as needed to maintain required freeboard. All land application of the waste from these
waste ponds is applied with either a honeywagon or a dragline. A separate barn confines 250 dry
cows 100% of time. A dry stack is located at the end of the dry cow barn and all waste from the dry
cows is pushed into the dry stack. Waste from the dry stack is spread on application fields with a
side slinger manure spreader. All other cows and heifers are on pasture and not confined.
Cropping systems to land apply all waste on will consist of corn silage, small grain silage, and
fescue hay. A total of632.5 acres is available for land application, which is approximately 3 times
the amount needed to apply the total Nitrogen produced.
In order to correlate as closely as possible the Beam's operation in the software, a single slurry
source of 1,474 milk cows was used which equals the amount of manure produced by 1,400 milk
cows, 70 heifers, and 100 calves.
Calculations to determine the amount of waste produced on the farm and the maximum storage
volume available are illustrated below. The combination of both waste storage ponds provides one
hundred eighty (180) days of storage for waste produced by 1,400 milk cows, 250 dry cows, 70
heifers and 100 calves. These calculations assume 100% confinement and no bedding.
LIQUID WASTE STORAGE VOLUME CALCULATIONS
1,400 Lactating Milk Cows, 1,200 pounds each, 100% confinement
70 Heifers, 500 pounds each, 100 % confinement
100 calves, 200 pounds each, 100% confinement
Watershed area = 3,700 ft2 unsurfaced, 23,100 ft2 surfaced, total 26,800 ft2
180 Day storage period
Critical rainfall period — October thru March (rainfall = 22.92 in, evaporation = 11.7 in)
25 year, 24 hour storm event = 5.5 in
LIQUID WASTE VOLUME _ (1,400 milk cow)(1,200 Ibs/cow)(1.9 ft3/day/1000 Ibs)(180 days) _
574,560 ft3
LIQUID WASTE VOLUME _ (70 heifers)(500 Ibs/cow)(0.9 ft3/day/1000 Ibs)(180 days) = 5,670 ft3
LIQUID WASTE VOLUME _ (100 calves)(200 Ibs/cow)(1.3 ft3/day/1000 Ibs)(180 days) = 4,680 ft3
RUNOFF VOLUME (180 day)
CN=98 S=(1000/98) — 10 = 0.20 in
Q = [(11.2 in) — 0.2(0.20 in)]2/[11.2 in + (0.8)(0.20 in)] = 10.96
Volume = (10.96 in)(1 ft/12 in)(26,800 ft2) = 24,477 ft3
RUNOFF VOLUME (25yr-24hr Storm)
Q = [(5.5 in) — 0.2(0.20 in)]2/[5.5 in + (0.8)(0.20 in)] = 5.27
Volume = (5.27 in)(1 ft/12 in)(26,800 ft2) = 11,770 ft3
WASH WATER VOLUME _ (4 gals/day/cow)(1,400 cows)(180 days) = 1,008,000 gals / 7.481 =
134,741 ft3
MINIMUM WASTE STORAGE VOLUME REQUIREMENT = 574,560 ft3 + 5,670 ft3 + 4,680 ft3
+24,477 ft3 + 11,770 ft3 + 134,741 ft3 = 755,898 ft3
1/16/2019 9:21:41 AM 1 / 2

Beam Dairy
11 /28/2018
TOTAL AVAILABLE WASTE STORAGE = 327,452 ft3 + 156,132 ft3 + 376,893 ft3 + 7,185 ft3 =
867,662 ft3
DRY STACK WASTE STORAGE VOLUME CALCULATIONS
250 Dry Milk Cows, 1,200 pounds each, 100% confinement
60 days of storage
All under roof no added rainfall
LIQUID WASTE VOLUME _ (250 dry cows)(1,200 Ibs/cow)(0.84 ft3/day/1000 Ibs)(60 days) _
15,120 ft3
DRY STACK AVAILABLE WASTE STORAGE: 18,480 ft3
1/16/2019 9:21:41 AM 2 / 2

Sources in Plan
Beam Dairy
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
U 1014
Beam Dairy Slurry waste generated 11,422,026 gals/year by a 1,474 Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid
Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately
180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Injected
91,392
Incorporated-4 wks or less
following application
91,392
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
following application
60,928
Broadcast
60,928
Irrigated
60,928
Max. Available
PAN (Ibs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus /
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/ Deficit
(Gallons)
Year
60,928
116,894
(55,966)
21,913,883
(10,491,857)
Year
60,928
64,866
(3,938)
12,160,347
(738,321)
1 /16/2019 11:45:33 AM 1 / 2

Sources in Plan
Beam Dairy
U 1015
Beam Surface Scraped waste generated 3,750 tons/year by a 250 Dairy (Milk Cow) Solid
operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Injected
10,675
Incorporated-4 wks or less
following application
10,675
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
following application
7,117
Broadcast
7,117
Irrigated
7,117
Max. Available
PAN (Ibs)
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus /
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Quantity
Applied (Tons)
Surplus/ Deficit (Tons)
Year 1
7,117
8,782
(1,665)
4,627
(877)
Year
7,117
12,187
(5,070)
6,421
(2,671)
1 /16/2019 11:45:33 AM 2 / 2

Waste Utilization Table
Beam Dairy
The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure
or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each
field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure
applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Tract ID
Field
ID
Source
ID
SMU
Total
Acreage
Wettable
Acreage
Crop Name
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
N
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
N
Res.
(Ibs/A)
N
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
N
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
1000
gal/A
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
tons
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
1000 gals
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
tons
883
1.
' 1014
CeB2
20.90
15.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
21.55
0
323.19
0
898
1
' 1014
CeB2
19.40
18.60
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
21.55
0
400.75
0
902 -
1
' 1014
CeB2
13.30
12.50
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
25
Broad.
214
40.09
0
501.18
0
902 -
1
' 1014
CeB2
13.30
12.50
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
903
1
' 1014
CeB2
22.60
22.60
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
21.55
0
486.94
0
903
2
' 1014
CeB2
18.80
18.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
21.55
0
394.29
0
903
3
' 1014
CeB2
34.70
34.70
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
21.55
0
747.64
0
2115 -
2
' 1015
PeB2
8.70
8.30
Corn, Silage
19 Tons
2/15-6/30
207
0
25
Broad.
182
0.00
95.90
1 0.00
795.97
2115 -
2
' 1015
PeB2
8.70
8.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
25
0.00
13.17
0.00
109.34
2115 -
3
' 1015
PeC2
8.90
8.00
Corn, Silage
16 Tons
2/15-6/30
174
0
25
Broad.
149
0.00
78.51
0.00
628.10
2115 -
3
' 1015
PeC2
8.90
8.00
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
25
0.00
13.17
0.00
105.39
2115 -
4
' 1015
PeB2
10.00
10.00
Corn, Silage
19 Tons
2/15-6/30
207
0
25
Broad.
182
0.00
95.90
0.00
959.01
1/16/2019 11:46:17 AM 1 / 7

Waste Utilization Table
Beam Dairy
2115 -
4
* 1015
PeB2
10.00
10.00
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
25
0.00
13.17
0.00
131.73
2115 --
7
* 1015
MsB
16.50
15.50
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
0.00
60.60
0.00
939.25
2582 -
4
* 1014
CeB2
1.60
1.50
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
25
Broad.
214
40.09
0
60.14
0
2582 -
4
* 1014
1 CeB2
1.60
1.50
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
1 9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
2583 -
1
* 1014
CeB2
30.60
30.60
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
25
Broad.
214
40.09
0
1,226.88
0
2583 -
1
* 1014
CeB2
30.60
30.60
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
2583 -
2
* 1014
CeB2
14.50
14.50
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
25
Broad.
214
40.09
1 0
581.36
0
2583 -
2
* 1014
CeB2
14.50
14.50
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
2583 -
3
* 1014
CeB2
17.80
17.30
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
25
Broad.
214
40.09
0
693.63
0
2583 -
3
* 1014
CeB2
17.80
17.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
3223 -
2
* 1014
CeB2
19.80
19.60
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
239
44.78
0
877.65
0
3223 -
2
* 1014
CeB2
19.80
19.60
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
3223 -
3
* 1014
PeB2
12.00
11.80
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
189
0
0
Broad.
189
35.41
0
417.84
0
3223 -
5
* 1014
PeB2
15.40
15.00
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
189
0
0
Broad.
189
35.41
0
531.15
0
3274
1
* 1014
PeC2
2.80
2.80
Corn, Silage
16 Tons
2/15-6/30
174
0
0
Broad.
174
32.60
0
91.28
0
3274
1 1
* 1014
PeC2
2.80
2.80
Small Grain, Silage
7.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
80
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
3274
2
* 1014
LdB2
41.00
41.00
Corn, Silage
21.6 Tons
2/15-6/30
235
0
0
Broad.
235
44.03
0
1,805.17
0
3274
2
* 1014
LdB2
41.00
41.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
3342
1
* 1014
CeB2
28.80
28.80
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
239
44.78
0
1,289.60
0
3342
1 1
* 1014
CeB2
28.80
28.80
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
3451
1
* 1014
CeB2
23.80
23.80
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
239
44.78
0
1,065.71
0
3451
1
* 1014
CeB2
23.80
23.80
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
3480
1
* 1014
CeB2
28.00
27.00
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
239
44.78
0
1,209.00
0
3480
1 1
1 *1015
CeB2
28.00
27.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3919
1 1
1 * 1014
1 PeB2
32.60
31.90
Corn, Silage
19 Tons
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
38.78
0
1,237.16
0
1/16/2019 11:46:17 AM 2 / 7

Waste Utilization Table
Beam Dairy
3919
1
* 1015
PeB2
32.60
31.90
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3980 -
4
* 1014
CeB2
17.30
16.80
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
239
44.78
0
752.27
0
3980 -
4
* 1014
CeB2
17.30
16.80
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
3981 -
1 7
* 1014
1 CeB2
14.00
12.10
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
1 8/1-7/31
211
0
0
Broad.
211
39.53
0
478.34
0
3982
2
* 1014
ChA
6.20
6.20
Corn, Silage
22.5 Tons
2/15-6/30
234
0
25
Broad.
209
39.16
0
242.78
0
3982
2
* 1014
ChA
6.20
6.20
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
3982
3
* 1014
PeC2
2.30
2.30
Corn, Silage
16 Tons
2/15-6/30
174
0
25
Broad.
149
27.92
1 0
64.21
0
3982
1 3
* 1014
PeC2
2.30
2.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
3982
8
* 1014
PeC2
1.30
1.30
Corn, Silage
16 Tons
2/15-6/30
174
0
25
Broad.
149
27.92
0
36.29
0
3982
8
* 1014
PeC2
1.30
1.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
4007 -
2
* 1014
CeB2
7.40
7.20
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
25
Broad.
214
40.09
1 0
288.68
0
4007 -
1 2
* 1014
CeB2
7.40
7.20
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Incor.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
4275
1
* 1014
CeB2
29.20
29.20
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
239
44.78
0
1,307.51
0
4275
1
* 1014
CeB2
29.20
29.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
4275
6
* 1014
PeB2
22.80
22.80
Corn, Silage
19 Tons
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
38.78
0
884.24
0
4275
1 6
* 1014
PeB2
22.80
22.80
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
4540 -
1
* 1015
PeB2
1.90
1.90
Corn, Silage
19 Tons
2/15-6/30
207
0
25
Broad.
182
0.00
95.90
0.00
182.21
4540 -
1
* 1015
PeB2
1.90
1.90
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
25
0.00
13.17
0.00
25.03
4540 -
2
* 1015
PeB2
2.00
2.00
Corn, Silage
19 Tons
2/15-6/30
207
0
25
Broad.
182
0.00
95.90
0.00
191.80
4540 -
1 2
* 1015
PeB2
2.00
2.00
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
25
0.00
13.17
0.00
26.35
4541
4
* 1015
MsB
9.60
8.80
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
0.00
60.60
0.00
533.25
5762 -
2
* 1014
CeB2
39.20
38.30
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
239
44.78
0
1,714.99
0
5762 -
2
* 1014
CeB2
39.20
38.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
5783
1 2
1 * 1014
CeB2
9.45
9.45
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
239
44.78
1 0
423.15
0
5783
1 2
1 * 1014
CeB2
9.45
9.45
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
1/16/2019 11:46:17 AM 3 / 7

Waste Utilization Table
Beam Dairy
5783
3
* 1014
PeC2
11.90
11.90
Corn, Silage
16 Tons
2/15-6/30
174
0
0
Broad.
174
32.60
0
387.94
0
5783
3
* 1014
PeC2
11.90
11.90
Small Grain, Silage
7.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
80
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
5784 —
1
* 1014
CeB2
13.20
13.20
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
239
44.78
0
591.07
0
5784 —
1
* 1014
CeB2
13.20
13.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
1 9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
5862
2
* 1014
CeB2
20.60
20.00
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
25
Broad.
214
40.09
0
801.88
0
5862
2
* 1014
CeB2
20.60
20.00
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
21,913.88
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
11,422.03
Balance, 1000 gallons
(10,491.86)
Total Applied, tons
4,627.43
Total Produced, tons
3,750.00
Balance, tons
(877.43)
1/16/2019 11:46:17 AM 4 / 7

Waste Utilization Table
Beam Dairy
Waste Utilization Table Year 2
Tract ID
Field
ID
Source
ID
SMU
Total
Acreage
Wettable
Acreage
Crop Name
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(Ibs/A)
N
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
N
Res.
(Ibs/A)
N
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs/A)
N
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
1000
gal/A
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
tons
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
1000 gals
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
tons
883
1.
* 1014
CeB2
20.90
15.00
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
239
44.78
0
671.67
0
883
1.
* 1014
CeB2
20.90
15.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
898
1
* 1014
CeB2
19.40
18.60
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
239
44.78
0
832.87
0
898
1
* 1014
CeB2
19.40
18.60
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
902 -
1
* 1014
CeB2
13.30
12.50
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
25
4.68
0
58.55
0
903
1
* 1014
CeB2
22.60
22.60
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
239
44.78
0
1,011.98
0
903
1
* 1014
CeB2
22.60
22.60
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
903
2
* 1014
CeB2
18.80
18.30
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
239
44.78
0
819.44
0
903
2
* 1014
CeB2
18.80
18.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
903
3
* 1014
CeB2
34.70
34.70
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
2/15-6/30
239
0
0
Broad.
239
44.78
0
1,553.79
0
903
3
* 1014
CeB2
34.70
34.70
1 Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
2115 --
2
* 1015
PeB2
8.70
8.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2115 --
3
* 1015
PeC2
8.90
8.00
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2115 --
4
* 1015
PeB2
10.00
10.00
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2115 -
7
* 1015
MsB
16.50
15.50
Corn, Silage
22.8 Tons
2/15-6/30
249
0
0
Broad.
249
0.00
131.20
0.00
2033.67
2115 --
7
* 1015
MsB
16.50
15.50
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2582 -
4
* 1014
CeB2
1.60
1.50
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
25
4.68
0
7.03
0
2583 -
1
* 1014
CeB2
30.60
30.60
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
25
4.68
0
143.33
0
2583 -
2
* 1014
CeB2
14.50
14.50
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
25
4.68
0
67.92
0
1/16/2019 11:46:17 AM 5 / 7

Waste Utilization Table
Beam Dairy
2583 -
3
* 1014
CeB2
17.80
17.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
25
4.68
0
81.03
0
3223 -
2
* 1014
CeB2
19.80
19.60
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
21.55
0
422.30
0
3223 -
3
* 1014
PeB2
12.00
11.80
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
8/1-7/31
189
0
0
Broad.
189
35.41
0
417.84
0
3223 -
1 5
* 1014
PeB2
15.40
15.00
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
1 8/1-7/31
189
0
0
Broad.
189
35.41
0
531.15
0
3274
1
* 1014
PeC2
2.80
2.80
Small Grain, Silage
7.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
80
0
0
Broad.
80
14.99
0
41.97
0
3274
2
* 1014
LdB2
41.00
41.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
109
20.42
0
837.29
0
3342
1
* 1014
CeB2
28.80
28.80
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
1 Broad.
115
21.55
0
620.52
0
3451
1 1
* 1014
CeB2
23.80
23.80
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
21.55
0
512.79
0
3480
1
* 1015
CeB2
28.00
27.00
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
0.00
60.60
0.00
1636.11
3919
1
* 1015
PeB2
32.60
31.90
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
95
0.00
50.06
0.00
1596.85
3980 -
4
* 1014
CeB2
17.30
16.80
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
1 Broad.
115
21.55
0
361.97
0
3981 -
1 7
* 1014
CeB2
14.00
12.10
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
211
0
0
Broad.
211
39.53
0
478.34
0
3982
2
* 1014
ChA
6.20
6.20
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
25
4.68
0
29.04
1 0
3982
3
* 1014
PeC2
2.30
2.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
25
4.68
0
10.77
0
3982
8
* 1014
PeC2
1.30
1.30
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
25
4.68
0
6.09
0
4007 -
1 2
* 1014
CeB2
7.40
7.20
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Incor.
25
3.12
0
22.48
0
4275
1
* 1014
CeB2
29.20
29.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
21.55
0
629.14
0
4275
6
* 1014
PeB2
22.80
22.80
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
95
17.80
0
405.81
0
4540 -
1
* 1015
PeB2
1.90
1.90
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4540 -
1 2
* 1015
PeB2
2.00
2.00
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4541
4
* 1015
MsB
9.60
8.80
Corn, Silage
22.8 Tons
2/15-6/30
249
0
0
Broad.
249
0.00
131.20
0.00
1154.60
4541
4
* 1015
MsB
9.60
8.80
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5762 -
2
* 1014
CeB2
39.20
38.30
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
21.55
0
825.21
0
5783
2
* 1014
CeB2
9.45
9.45
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
21.55
0
203.61
0
5783
3
* 1014
PeC2
11.90
11.90
Small Grain, Silage
7.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
80
0
0
Broad.
80
14.99
0
178.36
0
1/16/2019 11:46:17 AM 6 / 7

Waste Utilization Table
Beam Dairy
5784 -
1
* 1014
CeB2
13.20
13.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
115
0
0
Broad.
115
21.55
0
284.41
0
5862
2
� 1014
CeB2
20.60
20.00
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
9/1-3/31
25
0
0
Broad.
25
4.68
0
93.68
0
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
12,160.35
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
11,422.03
Balance, 1000 gallons
(738.32)
Total Applied, tons
6,421.23
Total Produced, tons
3,750.00
Balance, tons
(2,671.23
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 1. Symbol ' means user entered data.
1/16/2019 11:46:17 AM 7 / 7

Planned Crops Summary
Beam Dairy
The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in the plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
and Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) recommendations are also provided for each crop as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate.
The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where
available.
If a filed's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with
North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the
following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Wettable
Acres
SMU
LI
Crop Name RYE
Recom-
mended
PAN
PLAT
Rating
P205 (lbs/acre)
Crop
Removal Applied
883
1.
20.9
15
CeB2
12
Small Grain, Silage 10.4 Tons
115
Low
56
NA
Corn, Silage 21.9 Tons
239
Low
74
NA
898
1
19.4
18.6
CeB2
12
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
115 Low
56
NA
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
239 Low
74
NA
902 -
1
1 13.3
12.5
CeB2
12
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
239
Low
74
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
25
Low
0
NA
903
1
22.6
22.6
CeB2
12
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
115
Low
56
NA
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
239
Low
74
NA
903
2
18.8
18.3
CeB2
12
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
115
Low
56
NA
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
239
Low
74
NA
903
3
34.7
34.7
CeB2
12
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
115
Low
56 NA
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
239
Low
74 NA
2115 -
2
8.7
8.3
PeB2
12
Corn, Silage
19 Tons
207
Low
65 NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
25
Low
0 NA
2115 -
3
8.9
8
PeC2
12
Corn, Silage
16 Tons
174
Low
1 54 NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
25
Low
1 0 NA
1/16/2019 9:17:42 AM 1 / 5

Planned Crops Summary
Beam Dairy
2115 -
4
10
10
PeB2
12
Corn, Silage 19 Tons 207 Low 65 NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
25
Low
0
NA
2115 -
7
16.5
15.5
Ms6
12
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
115 Low
56
NA
Corn, Silage
22.8 Tons
249 Low
78
NA
2582 -
4
1.6
1.5
Ce132
12
jw-
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
239 Low
74
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
25 Low
0
NA
2583 -
1
30.6
30.6
Ce132
12
Corn, Silage 21.9 Tons
239
Low
74
NA
Small Grain Cover 0 Tons
25
Low
0
NA
2583 -
2
14.5
14.5
CeB2
12
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
239
Low
74
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
25
Low
0
NA
2583 -
3
17.8
17.3
CeB2
12
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
239
Low
74
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
25
Low
0
NA
3223 -
2
19.8
19.6
Ce132
12
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
239
Low
74
NA
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
115
Low
56
NA
3223 -
3
12
11.8
Pe132
12
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons 189 Low
1 68
NA
3223 -
5
15.4
15
Pe132
12
Fescue Hay
4.3 Tons
189
Low
1 68
NA
3274
1
2.8
2.8
Pe C2
12
AIIIIIIIIIIII
Corn, Silage
16 Tons
174
Medium
54
NA
Small Grain, Silage
7.2 Tons
80
Medium
39
NA
3274
1 2
41
41
LdB2
12
Corn, Silage
21.6 Tons
235
Low
1 73
NA
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tons
109
Low
1 53
NA
3342
1
28.8
28.8
CeB2
12
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
239
Low
74
NA
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
115
Low
56
NA
3451
1
23.8
23.8
Ce132
12
Corn, Silage 21.9 Tons
239
Low
1 74
NA
1/16/2019 9:17:42 AM 2 / 5

Planned Crops Summary
Beam Dairy
3480 1 11 281 271 Ce1321 12
39191 11 32.61 31.91 PeB21 12
3980 -1 41 17.31 16.81 Ce1321 12
3981 -1
71
141
12.11
Ce1321
12
3982
1 2
6.2
6.2
ChA
5.E
39821 31 2.31 2.31 PeC21 12
39821 81 1.31 1.31 PeC21 12
4007 -1 21 7.41 7.21 Ce1321 12
42751 11 29.21 29.21 Ce1321 12
4275 1 61 22.81 22.81 PeB21 12
4540 --1 11 1.91 1.91 Pe1321 12
4540 -1 21 21 21 Pe1321 12
Small Grain, Silage 10.4 Tons 115 Low 1 56 NA
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
239
Low
1 74
NA
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
115
Low
1 56
NA
Corn, Silage
19 Tons
207 Low
1 65
NA
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
95 Low
1 46
NA
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
239 Low
74 NA
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
115 Low
56 NA
Fescue Hay
4.8 Tons
211
Low
75 NA
Corn, Silage
22.5 Tons
234
Low
77
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
25
Low
0
NA
Corn, Silage
16 Tons
174
Low
1 54
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
25
Low
1 0
NA
Corn, Silage
16 Tons
174
Low
54
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
25
Low
0
NA
Corn, Silage 21.9 Tons
239
Low
74
NA
Small Grain Cover 0 Tons
25
Low
0
NA
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
239
Low
74
NA
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
115
Low
56
NA
Corn, Silage 19 Tons
207
Medium
65
NA
Small Grain, Silage 8.6 Tons
95
Medium
46
NA
Corn, Silage 19 Tons
207
Low
65
NA
Small Grain Cover 0 Tons
25
Low
0
NA
Corn, Silage
19 Tons
207
Low
65
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
25
Low
0
NA
1/16/2019 9:17:42 AM 3 / 5

Planned Crops Summary
Beam Dairy
4541
4
9.6
8.8
MsB
12
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
115
Low
56
NA
Corn, Silage
22.8 Tons
249
Low
78
NA
5762 -
2
39.2
38.3
CeB2
12
AL
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
239
Low
74
NA
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
115
Low
56
NA
5783
2
9.45
9.45
CeB2
12
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
239 Low
74
NA
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
115 Low
56
NA
5783
3
11.9
11.9
PeC2
12
Corn, Silage
16 Tons
174
Medium
I
NA
Small Grain, Silage
7.2 Tons
80
Medium
1 39
NA
5784 -
1
13.2
13.2
CeB2
12
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
239
Medium
74
NA
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
115
Medium
56
NA
5862
1 2
20.6
20
CeB2
12
Corn, Silage
21.9 Tons
239
Low
1 74
NA
Small Grain Cover
0 Tons
25
Low
1 0
NA
Totals:
650.85
632.55
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned.
Ll
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble nutrient
None
<2
leaching below the root zone.
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble nutrient
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
> = 2 & < = 10
leaching below the root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble nutrient
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation
leaching below the root zone.
practices that improve available water holding capacity of soil and
improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples are
> 10
Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328),
Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter
Strips(393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
1/16/2019 9:17:42 AM 4 / 5

Planned Crops Summary
Beam Dairy
P Loss Index
Rating P Management Recommendation
0 - 25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
26 - 50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
Starter P application only
> 100
Very High
1/16/2019 9:17:42 AM 5 / 5

Required Soil Test Values
Beam Dairy
The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that
should be taken based off information provided at time of soil tests. Fields that receive manure must have a soil
analysis conducted at least once every three years. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant
growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels.
Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in Ibs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071,
respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc,
we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop
based on the first crop listed on the most recent soil sample. Application of lime at recommended rates is
necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production. If the first crop or rotation changes, these
recommendations may need to be reevaluated to ensure optimal ranges ofr crop production are maintained.
Tract ID
Field ID
Crop(s)
pH
Lime Recom.
for Crop(s)
(tons/acre)
Cu-1
Copper
Recommendation
Zn-I
Zinc
Recommendation
883
1.
6.3
0,0
9
0,0
76
0,0
898
1
6
0,0
14
0,0
95
0,0
902
1
6.5
0,0
27
0,0
81
0,0
903
1
7.3
0,0
566
0,0
579
0,0
903
2
7.4
0,0
610
0,0
601
0,0
903
3
7.3
0,0
566
0,0
579
0,0
2115
2
6.2
0,0
140
0,0
167
0,0
2115
3
7
0,0
322
0,0
240
0,0
2115
4
7
0,0
322
0,0
240
0,0
2115
7
7.2
0,0
295
0,0
407
0,0
2582
4
6.6
0,0
74
0,0
100
0,0
2583
1
6.1
0,0
48
0,0
87
0,0
2583
2
6.1
0,0
48
0,0
87
0,0
2583
3
6.6
0,0
74
0,0
100
0,0
3223
2
5.4
0,0
75
0,0
79
0,0
3223
3
5.4
0,0
75
0,0
79
0,0
3223
5
7.3
0,0
566
0,0
590
0,0
3274
1
7
0,0
780
0,0
949
0,0
3274
2
5.8
0,0
128
0,0
152
0,0
3342
1
7.3
0,0
901
0,0
1272
0,0
3451
1
7.2
0,0
798
0,0
924
0,0
1/16/2019 9:22:24 AM 1 / 2

Required Soil Test Values
Beam Dairy
3480
1
6.7
0,0
346
0,0
303
0,0
3919
1
6.4
0,0
59
0,0
68
0,0
3980
4
7
0,0
780
0,0
949
0,0
3981
7
7
0,0
780
0,0
949
0,0
3982
2
5.8
0,0
128
0,0
152
0,0
3982
3
5.8
0,0
128
0,0
152
0,0
3982
8
5.8
0,0
128
0,0
152
0,0
4007
2
6.4
0,0
66
0,0
98
0,0
4275
1
7.3
0,0
566
0,0
590
0,0
4275
6
7.1
0,0
926
0,0
935
0,0
4540
1
6.2
0,0
140
0,0
167
0,0
4540
2
6.2
0,0
140
0,0
167
0,0
4541
4
7.4
0,0
298
0,0
282
0,0
5762
2
6.6
0,0
208
0,0
299
0,0
5783
2
7.5
0,0
778
0,0
753
0,0
5783
3
7.8
0,0
600
0,0
774
0,0
5784
1
7.2
0,0
860
0,0
973
0,0
5862
2
Corn silage, SG/Corn silage
6
0,0
95
0,0
131
0,0
Zinc and Copper Toxicity Levels in Soils
Metal
Soil Test Index
Recommended Action
Zn
300
Limit application on peanuts. Maintain soil pH - 6.0.
500
Cease application on peanut land. Maintain soil pH - 6.0.
2000
Caution: seek alternative site (all crops). Maintain soil pH - 6.0.
3000
Cease application (all crops). Maintain soil pH - 6.0.
cu
2000
Caution: seek alternative site (all crops). Maintain soil pH - 6.0.
3000
Cease application (all crops). Maintain soil pH - 6.0.
1/16/2019 9:22:24 AM 2 / 2

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of
the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, storical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations
that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per
year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are
installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical
Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
s. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from
the land application field.

6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied
to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast
provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding
(see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate
such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method
which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding
should occur in order to control odor and flies.
s. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates
on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop
planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than
30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied
from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet
from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet

13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainage ways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied
to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied
on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on
other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from wash down facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall
be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees,
shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms
and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which
will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on
a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.

20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with
no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at
least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall
be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to
be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate
than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum
crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum
of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a
minimum of three years. Waste application records for all other waste shall
be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.

gNRCS
United States Department of Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Prepared for:
22
Farm:
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT?
Nutrient Management is applying nutrients
from all sources with the right placement, in
the right amount, at the right time, and from
the right source to minimize nutrient losses to
surface and groundwater. This practice is
accomplished through development and
implementation of a Nutrient Management
Plan, which can be part of a broader
Conservation Plan or CNMP that addresses
multiple resource concerns.
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
A nutrient management plan is intended to
accomplish one or more of the following
objectives:
• To budget, supply, and conserve nutrients for
plant production.
• To minimize agricultural nonpoint source
pollution of surface and groundwater
resources.
• To properly utilize manure or organic by-
products as a plant nutrient source.
• To protect air quality by reducing odors,
nitrogen emissions (ammonia, oxides of
nitrogen), and the formation of atmospheric
particulates.
• To maintain or improve the physical, chemical,
and biological condition of soil.
CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT PLAN
The following components are included in
nutrient management plan specifications
typical of more 'traditional'
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590
Tract(s):
Date:___/_J
fertilizer and manure application methods.
When precision ag/variable rate application
technology is utilized, see the next section of
this Job Sheet for additional guidance on plan
requirements.
• aerial site photograph(s)/imagery or site
map(s), and a soil survey map of the site,
• Sufficient soils information —such as dominant
soil map until for each planned field —needed
to apply nutrients at RYE and Soil Test Report
determined rates as appropriate; and to not
exceed rates determined by nutrient risk
assessment planning criteria.
• location of designated sensitive areas and the
associated nutrient application restrictions and
setbacks,
• results of approved risk assessment tools for
any necessary evaluations for nitrogen,
phosphorus, and erosion losses.
• current and/or planned plant production
sequence or rotation,
• soil, water, compost, manure, organic by-
product, and plant tissue sample analyses
applicable to the plan. Where non-NCDA soil
testing labs are used, nutrient
recommendations must be made using NCDA-
similar guidelines and methodologies. Note:
high levels of soil copper and zinc may be toxic
to production crops. Land application of these
nutrients must be accordance with
NCSU/NCDA crop toxicity guidelines.
• Realistic yield goals for the crops planned for
nutrient application,
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 1

• Planned nitrogen application rates based on
NC Realistic Yield Expectations (RYEs) or
sufficiently documented yield records,
• The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned
fields,
• Planned P & K application rates based on soil
test results (see next section where P & K
applied through variable rate technology).
• listing and quantification of all nutrient sources
and form, including starter fertilizer
applications and legume -based cover crop
mixes.
• in accordance with the nitrogen and
phosphorus risk assessment tool(s), specify
the recommended nutrient application source,
timing, amount (except for precision/variable
rate applications specify method used to
determine rate), and placement of plant
nutrients for each field or management unit,
and
• guidance for implementation, operation and
maintenance, and recordkeeping as specified
by the CNMP or applicable NC DWQ or
NDPES permit.
Where precision/variable rate nutrient
application applications are planned and
made, some required planning components of
the preceding section may be provided by the
overall conservation plan. In addition, the
following components are required in nutrient
management planning.
• The geo-referenced field boundary and data
collected that was processed and analyzed as
a GIS layer or layers to generate nutrient or
soil amendment recommendations.
• Planned nitrogen application rates based on
NC RYEs or sufficiently documented yield
records
• The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned
fields.
• The nutrient recommendation guidance and
recommendation equations used to convert the
GIS base data layer or layers to a nutrient
source material recommendation GIS layer or
layers.
Soil testing documentation that crop
Phosphorus (P205) and Potassium (K20)
nutrient or soil amendment application will be
made per soil test results similar to NCDA
guidelines. Where P & K will not be applied
via variable rate application technology, but by
basic GPS guidance, recommended P & K
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015
rates must be provided as specifications prior
to application.
• Note —where Diammonium phosphate (18-46-
0) is the primary variable rate P fertilizer
source applied on legume crops, additional N
will likely be needed to achieve RYEs.
The plan was developed based on the current
NRCS 590 standard and Federal, state, or
local regulations or policies. Changes in laws
or regulations may require a plan modification.
This Job Sheet is a required supplement to
the Nutrient Management Plan.
NC Permitted Animal Operations: For NC
DENR-DWR or NPDES permitted animal
operations, the waste utilization portion of the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP) must meet requirements specified by
the Permit. The NC 1217 Interagency Group
provides guidance on the required minimum
elements of a CAWMP. This guidance is found in
Sec 1.1 of the latest 1217 Guidance Document,
located at:
http://www.ncaqr.gov/SWC/tech/quidancedocumen
ts.html.
Nitrogen Leaching Index Values
Nitrogen Leaching Index values, obtained through
use of current Soil Hydrologic Group (SHG)-based
LI index maps in Sec II of the NC FOTG or RUSLE
2 field -specific soil loss calculations, are included
in the Nutrient Management Plan. SHGs per soil
map unit are available through selection of the Soil
Data Explorer and Soil Properties and Qualities
(then select "Soil Qualities and Features") tabs
once an Area of Interest has been defined in
NRCS Web Soil Survey.
If the Nitrogen Leaching Index > 10 for planned
fields, appropriate conservation practices must be
included in a conservation plan to prevent nitrogen
from leaving the field via surface or subsurface
runoff.
Below are conservation crop management
techniques and practices recommended for
mitigation of nitrate losses (practices also
documented in conservation plan):
page 2

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
DEVELOPMENT
The nutrient management plan has been
developed to meet nutrient application rate criteria
for all sources of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium
as specified by NRCS 590 Nutrient Management
standard criteria.
In addition to NCDA Agronomic Division soil test
recommendations, or soil test recommendations
made through similar guidelines, the plan is based
on NC INMC approved values for realistic yield
goals, nitrogen factors, phosphorus removal rates,
default nutrient values for animal waste, plant
availability coefficients for N, P, and K, and animal
waste generation volumes where applicable.
Approved values are found at:
ht4o.-Anutrients. soil. ncsu. edu/index.htm
Where manure is applied, farm records may also
be used through a procedure provided in SIB 1217
Interagency Group guidance, available at:
htto://www. ncagr. gov/SWC/tech/12l7committee. ht
ml
For NC permitted animal operations, planning
requirements for Plan "Amendments" (minor
modifications) and "Revisions" (Major
Modifications) are clarified by SB 1217 Interagency
Group Guidance.
ADDITIONAL PHOSPHORUS -RELATED
PLAN INFORMATION (Applicable when
increases in Soil Test P are expected on
the planned area)
In NC, a field -specific Phosphorus Loss
Assessment Tool (PLAT) evaluation is completed
in accordance with 590 Nutrient Management
standard General Criteria requirements, and
phosphorus must be applied in accordance with
590 standard Manure Phosphorus Application
Rates.
In addition to the basic plan components, plan
information on PLAT categorical ratings, P
drawdown strategies, and conservation practices
to reduce P loss risk is required when increases in
Soil Test P are expected on the planned area.
Typically, this could occur when manure is
consistently applied at Nitrogen -based rates. High
levels of phosphorus in the surface soil layer have
been linked to increasing risk of P loss through
surface runoff and leaching.
❑ Increases in Soil Test P are expected
on the planned area (not typical if P
application made per soil test results).
PLAT Categorical Ratings Information
When soil test phosphorus continues to increase
on a long term basis, PLAT may produce results
that require P-based manure application planning
and planning for no additional manure P.
Conditions that will require P-based or no-P
planning will be based on site specific resource
conditions, which will facilitate data input into
PLAT. PLAT categorical ratings that will require
enhanced P application planning are:
HIGH: P-based manure application is required
(limited to P uptake in harvested crop biomass)
VERY HIGH: No additional manure P or starter P
application to be specified in nutrient management
plan.
Phosphorus Drawdown Strategy
Information:
Implementation of a phosphorus 'drawdown'
strategy may be a consequence of PLAT results,
or may be requested in order to lower soil test
phosphorus levels.
Should a reduction in soil test P be desired or
necessary, the only currently proven method of
substantial P 'drawdown' is to not apply manure -
based P and to plant and harvest crops that utilize
P currently present in the soil surface.
Crop specific estimated annual P removal amounts
are available on the NCSU Nutrient Management
in NC website:
http://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/vields/index.php
Conservation Practices and Management
Techniques to Reduce P Loss Potential:
Conservation practices, especially those that
prevent soil particle detachment and trap sediment
at field edges are effective in preventing
phosphorus movement from the planned site.
Manure application techniques can also be applied
to reduce P loss risk. These practices must be
included in the conservation plan where
determined PLAT risk = HIGH for planned fields.
Consult the conservation plan developed in
conjunction with the nutrient management plan for
information on practices recommended to reduce
phosphorus AND nitrogen loss risks. Application
management techniques to reduce nutrient loss
risk may be prescribed below:
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015
page 3

Long Term Strategy for Reduction of Soil P
Levels:
As noted in the P drawdown strategy section, the
only currently proven method for reducing high
levels of soil P is not applying P, paired with
producing crops on the planned site that use
existing soil P. Where soil P and PLAT
evaluations indicate an increasing risk to water
quality, substantially reducing soil P levels through
crop uptake can take many years of
implementation. When P is not applied, and
existing soil P is used by crops, eventually, soil will
become P deficient. Consult CES or NCDA
Regional Agronomy specialists for additional
information soil test P reduction timelines.
Manure P produced in excess of crop
requirements:
Consult the nutrient management plan for a
quantification of manure generated by the animal
feeding operation that may exceed crop P
requirements.
"Manure Hauler" Information
All manure waste applied on land owned by or
controlled by the Animal Feeding Operation (AFO)
owner or operator must be included in the nutrient
management plan. The volume difference in total
manure waste generated by the AFO and waste
applied to land not owned or controlled by the
producer must be accounted for in a nutrient
management plan.
General information on manure waste generated
by an AFO to be applied to land not owned or
controlled by the AFO owner or operator may be
recorded as specified in the NC CNMP
Certification Sheet and Documentation Checklist or
other supplemental documentation to the nutrient
management plan. NRCS CNMP technical criteria
require documentation of manure exports off the
farm (this can be done below). The AFO
owner/operator should provide the third party
applicator with a current waste analysis in order to
facilitate agronomic crop application of the facility's
generated waste. Should land not owned or
controlled by the AFO owner or operator be
included in a nutrient management plan, the
complete plan must meet 590 criteria.
Type and Quantity of Animal Feeding Operation
(AFO) manure generated by the facility:
Quantity of AFO manure generated to be exported
off the farm for third party application:
RECORDKEEPING
Waste reports from the NCDA & CS Agronomic
Division, or equivalent, are acceptable sources of
information for determining applied manure nutrient
amounts for recordkeeping or crop budgeting
purposes.
Records must be maintained for at least 5 years, or
for time and manner required by Permit for animal
operations to document plan implementation and
maintenance. As applicable, records include:
• soil, plant tissue, water, manure, and
organic by-product analyses resulting in
recommendations for nutrient application,
• quantities, analyses and sources of
nutrients applied,
• dates, and method(s) of nutrient
applications, source of nutrients, and rates
of application,
• weather conditions and soil moisture at the
time of application; lapsed time to manure
incorporation; rainfall or irrigation event,
• crops planted, planting and harvest dates,
yields, nutrient analyses of harvested
biomass, and crop residues removed,
• dates of plan review, name of reviewer,
and recommended changes resulting from
the review, and
• all enhanced efficiency fertilizer products
used.
Additional records for precision/variable rate
sites must include:
• maps identifying the variable application
source, timing, amount, and placement of
all plant nutrients applied, and
• GPS-based yield maps for crops where
yields can be digitally collected.
• Documentation per field nitrogen
application rates do not exceed RYE -
based recommended rates
• Documentation that applied phosphorus
and potassium recommendations do not
exceed recommended rates specified by
soil tests.
• For non -variable rate application of P & K,
provide applied map with field boundaries
indicating source, timing, method, and rate
of all applications.
• Where 'chlorophyll reader' technology is
utilized, application records that nitrogen
rates match RYE -based N rates as closely
as possible.
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 4

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
The producer is responsible for safe operation and
maintenance of this practice, including all
equipment. Review the plan periodically to
determine if adjustments or modifications to the
plan are needed. In NC, animal operations
permitting provisions may specify more frequent
review periods. Adhere to the following operation
and maintenance provisions:
• Protect fertilizer and organic by-product
storage facilities from weather and accidental
leakage or spillage.
• Properly calibrate application equipment to
ensure uniform distribution of material at
planned rates.
• Workers should be protected from and avoid
unnecessary contact with inorganic fertilizers
and organic by-products. Extra caution must
be taken when handling ammonia sources of
nutrients, or when dealing with organic wastes
stored in unventilated enclosures.
• The disposal of material generated by the
cleaning of nutrient application equipment
should be accomplished properly. Excess
material should be collected and stored or field
applied in an appropriate manner. Excess
material should not be applied on areas of high
potential risk for runoff or leaching.
• Disposal or recycling of nutrient containers
should be done according to state and local
guidelines or regulations.
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 5

y Y{
r I d
r4 4v 'j
�� jeetm Daity
Im
an� '
. •,-r
VA
a
.Gob eEarth �' � �

i
Lmcolntoni{
r,: .
1Beam Dairy m E ✓ s .If �,-" ,i. A,
ri rtrouse
° t
44
A.
' �Dellview 4
Google'Earth — '6arryville N'
= a
o20180009la I amp I

ir
` A
Google Ear t ' + N
' 1000 ft
o20180009la ... 4. :r f __

Beam Dairy Tract 898 Field 1
i
F•
,poglgEarth --
N
700 ft

e
r
1�
Gpogle Ear,
20,aoo 9a
�1
ki
N
goof

r
Google Earth
�2018 Google f
V
I -1000rc

Google Earth

_ 4
a
r
*�.r�

Beam Dairy Tracts 3223
s
T'
,t
✓,;
LI
A
:It`1Ar.114 .
Aw

Beam
Dairy Tracts 3342, 40073
57623
5784
A
Goggle Earth s N
o2018 0009la 1000 ft

Google Earth

FBeamDairy Tract 3919 Field 1
Go! rk@20
,a0009�a ioo0 — _ —'I

Google Earth
N
1000 ft

Google Earth
A
N
900 n

i�
Google Earth
o2018000qla
Beam
Dairy
Tracts 4275,
5783
400

Beam Dairy Tract 5862 Field 2
I.
A
Google Earth 4
N
O.
A
N
900 n

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DwQ -7oti-663--11�9
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM % 0`1- 73 E - ? 16 d
SWCD `lay -`13 6 - � 501
NRCS �oq--136-?5o 1
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the
facility. The following are some action items you should take.
Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
December 18, 1996

D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
,d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a
submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
£ Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office;
Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call
should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item
2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the
spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number - -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - - , and
local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
2 December 18, 1996

4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address:
c. Contractors Phone:
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name:
b. Phone:
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
December 18, 1996

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source - Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Svstems
Flush gutters • Accumulation of solids SY Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as
designed
© Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids L Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where.
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
wer more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative Decaying vegetation Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Svstems
Feeders • Feed spillage ©` Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
cumulation of decaying wastage
qP Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7- to 10-
day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day interval
during winter)
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page 1

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause /r BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed
residues
Animal holding areas • Accumulations of animal
wastes and feed wastage
Dry manure handling . Accumulations of animal
systems wastes
1( Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
/products)
®Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
lids in filter strips around feed storage as needed
Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal
91 Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove or break up
jaccumulated solids as needed)
Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
7- to 10-day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
0 Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
© Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page 2

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source
Cause
BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead
.
Dairy production
0 Vegetative or wooded buffers
SI/Recommended best management practices
`Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn
•
Wet manure -covered
crape or flush daily
Vpromote
alley surfaces
surfaces
drying with proper ventilation
O Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
_
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas
r
UrinePromote
drying with proper ventilation
•
Partial microbial
lei'/" Replace wet or manure -covered bedding
decomposition
Manure dry stacks
•
Partial microbial
0 Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
decomposition
Storage tank or
•
Partial microbial
0 Bottom or mid -level loading
basin surface
decomposition
0 Tank covers
•
Mixing while filling
0 Basin surface mats of solids
•
Agitation when emptying
0 Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
© Agitate only prior to manure removal
O Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin
•
Partial microbial
0 Liquid drainage from settled solids
surfaces
decomposition
0 Remove solids regularly
• Mixing while filling
• _ Agitation when emptying _
Manure, slurry, or • Agitation when spreading 0 Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader . Volatile gas emissions 0 Wash residual manure from spreader after use
outlets . 0 Proven biological additives or oxidants
April 18, 2006, page 1

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
-
Source
-
Cause
- — to Minimize Odor ,Site Specific
BMPs � Practices
Uncovered manure,
• Volatile gas emissions while
' 0
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on
drying
0
oil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces
spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
O
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
0
Flush tank covers
liquid while tanks are filling
©
Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with.
,anti -siphon vents
Outside drain Agitation during wastewater 0 Box covers
collection or junction conveyance
boxes
Lift stations
• Agitation during sump tank
0
Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at
• Agitation during wastewater
71
Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon
conveyance
lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces
+ Volatile gas emission
®
Proper lagoon liquid capacity
• Biological mixing
®
Correct lagoon startup procedures
• Agitation
0
Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio
©
Minimum agitation when pumping
0
Mechanical aeration
O
Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler
. High pressure agitation
0
Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles
. Wind drift
0
Minimum recommended operating procedure
0
Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
O
Pump from second -stage lagoon
O
Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
April 18, 2006, page 2

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site S12ecific Practices
Dead animals . Carcass decomposition V Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water • Improper drainage Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities . Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto . Poorly maintained access Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access
Additional Information:
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP Packet
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System ---Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory; EBAE 209-95
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
April 18, 2006, page 3
Available From:
NCSU, County Extension Center
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU BAE
NCSU—BAE .
Florida Cooperative Extension

Version —November 26, 2018
Mortality Management Methods
indicate which methods) will be implemented.
When selecting multiple methods indicate a primary versus secondary option.
Methods other than those listed must be approved by the State Veterinarian.
Primary Secondary Routine Mortality
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours of knowledge of animal
death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water
(G.S.106-403). The bottom of the burial pit should beat least one foot above the seasonal
high water table. Attach burial location map and plan.
Landfill at municipal solid waste facility permitted by NC DEQ under GS 15A NCAC
13B .0200.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7.
Complete incineration according to 02 NCAC 52C .0102.
A composting system approved and permitted by the NC Department of Agriculture & Con-
sumer Services Veterinary Division (attach copy of permit). if compost is distributed off -farm,
additional requirements must be met and a permit is required from NC DEQ.
In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the
NC Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services (G.S. 106-549.70).
D Any method which, in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian, would make possible
the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health.
(Written approval by the State Veterinarian must be attached).
Mass Mortality Plan
Mass mortality plans are required for farms covered by an NPDES permit. These plans are
also recommended for all animal operations. This plan outlines farm -specific mortality man-
agement methods to be used for mass mortality. The NCDA&CS Veterinary Division sup-
ports a variety of emergency mortality disposal options; contact the Division for guidance.
• A catastrophic mortality disposal plan is part of the facility's CAWMP and is activated
when numbers of dead animals exceed normal mortality rates as specified by the State
Veterinarian.
• Burial must be done in accordance with NC General Statutes and NCDA&CS Veterinary
Division regulations and guidance.
• Mass burial sites are subject to additional permit conditions (refer to facility's animal
waste management system permit).
• In the event of imminent threat of a disease emergency, the State Veterinarian may enact
additional temporary procedures or measures for disposal according to G.S. 106-399.4.
P�� P &-c i � -
i ature of rm Owner/ /ajnager
//ffy P
Signature of Technical Spe ialist
�-- -tf/r
Date
/ r- Z Z_ --2-6 ! 9
Date