490008_Permit Renewal Application 2019_20190410

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Animal Waste Management Systems
Request for Certification of Coverage
Facility Currently covered by an Expiring Sate Non -Discharge General Permit
On September 30, 2019, the North Carolina State Non -Discharge General Permits for Animal Waste Management Systems will
expire. As required by these permits, facilities that have been issued Certificates of Coverage to operate under these State
Non -Discharge General Permits must apply for renewal at least 180 days prior to their expiration date. Therefore, all applications
must be received by the Division of Water Resources by no later than April 3, 2019.
Please do not leave any question unanswered. Please verify all information and make any necessary corrections below.
Application must be signed and dated by the Permi#ee.
1. Farm Number: 49-0008 Certificate Of Coverage Number: AWC490008
2. Facility Name: Fox Farm
3. Landowner's Name (same as on the Waste Management Plan): Koopman Dairies Inc
4. Landowner's Mailing Address: 204 Llcr. d Rd
City: Statesville State: NC Zip: 28625
Telephone Number: 704-876-4909 Ext. E-mail:
5. Facility's Physical Address: 122 Bunke Dr
City: Statesville State: NC Zip: 28625
6. County where Facility is located: Iredell
7. Farm Manager's Name (if different from Landowner):
8. Farm Manager's telephone number (include area code):
9. Integrator's Name (if there is not an Integrator, write "None"):
10. Operator Name (OIC): Harry Phillip McLain III Phone No.: 707-871-6151 OIC #: 991884
11. Lessee's Name (if there is not a Lessee, write "None"): Ard Koopman
12. Indicate animal operation type and number:
Current Permit: Operations Type
Allowable Count
Cattle - Milk Cow 900
Operation Types:
Swine Cattle Dry Poultry Other Types
Wean to Finish Dairy Calf Non Laying Chickens Horses - Horses
Wean to Feeder Dairy Heifer Laying Chickens Horses - Other
Farrow to Finish Milk Cow Pullets Sheep - Sheep
Feeder to Finish Dry Cow Turkeys Sheep - Other
Farrow to Wean Beef Stocker Calf Turkey Pullet
Farrow to Feeder Beef Feeder
Boar/Stud Beef Broad Cow Wet Poultr%
Gilts Other Non Laying Pullet
Other Layers

13. Waste Treatment and Storage Lagoons (Verify the following information is accurate and complete. Make all necessary
corrections and provide missing data.)
Structure
Name
Estimated
Date
Built
Liner Type
(Clay, Synthetic,
Unknown)
Capacity
(Cubic Feet)
Estimated
Surface Area
(Square Feet)
Design
Freeboard
"Redline"
(Inches)
WSP
1
407,457.00
�� 1...)25.20
73
Mail one (1) copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with this completed and signed application
as required by NC General Statutes 143-215.10C(d) to the address below.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
1. The most recent Waste Utilization Plan (WUP), sinned 131 the owner and a certified technical specialistcontaining:
a. The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation, injection, etc.)
b. A map of every field used for land application (for example: irrigation map)
c. The soil series present on every land application field
d. The crops grown on every land application field
e. The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP
f. The maximum PAN to be applied to every land application field
g. The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
h. The required NRCS Standard specifications
2. A site map/schematic
3. Emergency Action Plan
4. Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
5. Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
6. Mortality Control Checklist with selected method noted - Use the enclosed updated Mortality Control Checklist
7. Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.) Please be sure the above table is accurate and
complete. Also provide any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to
your facility.
8. Operation and Maintenance Plan
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal.
(e.g. composting, digesters, waste transfers, etc.)
As a second option to mailing paper copies of the application package, you can scan and email one signed copy of the
application and all the CAWMP items above to: [e-mail]

I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that,
if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not
included, this application package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-215.6E1, any person Who knowingly makes any false statement,
representation, or certification in any application may be subject to civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation. (18 U.S.C.
Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both for
a similar offense.)
Printed Name of Signing Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all landowners should sign. If Landowner is a
corporation, signature -should be by a principal executive officer of the corporation):
Name: nc\ l{ )OfY+C'^ ra
Title: ,�("C1E g
Signature. ,rr Date: 1 1_2 I d 5
Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
THE,COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
FORM: RENEWAL -STATE GENERAL 02/2019

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
February 26, 2019
Koopman Dairies Inc
Fox Farm
204 Lloyd Rd
Statesville, NC 28625
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring State General Permit
Dear Permittee:
APR 0' 1 2019
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation State Non -Discharge General Permits,
which expire on September 30, 2019. Copies of the new animal waste operation State Non -Discharge General Permits are available
at https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources!water-quality-regional-operations/afo or by writing or calling:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
In order to assure your continued coverage under the State Non -Discharge General Permits, ou must submit an application for
permit coverage to the Division. Enclosed you will find a "Request for Certificate of Coverage Facility Currently Covered b\ an
Expiring State Non -Discharge General Permit." The application form must be completed. signed and returned by April 3, 2019.
Please note that you must include one (11 cop% of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with the
completed and signed application form. A list of items included in the CAWMP can be found on page 2 of the renewal
application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the State Non -Discharge General Permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feel
free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Branch staff at 919-707-9100.
Enclosures
cc (w/o enclosures):
Sincerely,
Jon Risgaard, Section Chief
Animal Feeding Operations and Groundwater Section
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
AFOG Section Central Files - AWC490008
D 3 North Carol na Departrnemt of Eervroarreatee qua"I ty fYivs n of Wster kesaurces
512 N. Se^_nb rry St. (1€SE M& Sarvir Cent=_rCsra7'na 2761525
�.....�, 919.707 .9Wg

ARD KOOPMAN
FOX DAIRY
WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION: LOCATED on SR 2158 & SR 2170
LONGITUDE - 080°49'35.8" W
LATITUDE - 035°50'17.8" N
DAIRY SIZE: Maximum Number Cattle in Waste Management System
900 MILK COWS
Address: 204 Lloyd Road, Statesville, NC 28625
Phone: Cell 704-929-0659 Home 704-876-4909
UPDATED BY: Samue],..,C. Bingham, PE
APPROVED BY:
DATE:
This modifies the plan prepared for Ard Koopman in 2005.
In this revision, the cow numbers were increased to 900. The increase
in cow numbers resulted in less storage period.
Koopman Fox Dairy
1
Update 2013

r [4
.1
200 0
200 400 600
Scale 1" = 200'
• '-1:16
r rUt 15
•
fig •
SRo Runoff
Pump Mt
frtxinage to the'drid
Wastef•Storage Pond '
25 yp, Pump -Out Marker rs located
tre,,f'eet below ESW nn 2,3 below too
Dam Eievatlon, s. Yf
Koopman Dairy
Fox Farm
Plan View
Waste Management System
KOOPMAN DAIRIES
IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
wu
..q SCB 1.2013
nwn SCB 4-2013
Matl
++wow. M
Thk
an..'xn waxing Re Nome:-
C� 1 - Fox Plan View

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield
`imates are also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the
nosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the
harvested plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT
Rating should receive no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be
recommended in accordance with North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205
applied to each crop is shown in the following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
1. . seable
Acres
Plat
Rating
LI
ir -
Soil Series
,
Crop Sequence
RYE
P2O5
Removal
(lbs/acre)
Applied
(lbs/acre)
140
1
18.00
17.40
Medium
15.0
Cecil
- -
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
N/A
N/A
L
Corn, Silage
20.0 Tons
N/A
N/A
140
2
34.70
32.40
Medium
15.0
Cecil
Small Gram, Silage
10.1 Tons
N/A
N/A
Silage
21.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
4255
1
44.60
39.50
Medium
15.0
,Com,
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10-1 Tons
N/A
N/A
Corn, Silage
21.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
4255
2
22.90
21.20
Medium
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
10.1 Tons
N/A
N/A
r.
Com, Silage
21.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
4255
3
8.70
7.50
Medium
15.0
Cecil
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
N/A
N/A
Com, Silage
18.4 Tons
N/A
N/A
4255
4
1.90
1.90
Medium
15.0
Wilkes
Small Grain, Silage
4.9 Tons
N/A
N/A
Corn, Silage
8.4 Tons
N/A
N/A
4255
5
3.80
3.80
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
8.0 Tons
N/A
N/A
Com, Silage
I7.6 Tons
N/A
N/A
4325
AC 1
18.00
18.00
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
50
N/A
Com, Silage
20.2 Tons
69
N/A
4325
AC 2
9.30
9.30
Medium
15.0
_
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
51
N/A
-
Com, Silage
20.9 Tons
71
N/A
4325
AND I
17.40
r 17.40
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
r
Corn, Silage
20.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
4325
AND 2
14.20
13.70
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
-
Corn, Silage
20.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
4325
Ba 1
36.70
35.00
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
i
Corn, Silage
20.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
4325
Ba 2
29.90
28.50
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
Com, Silage
20.2 Tons,
N/A
N/A
4325
Ba 3
59.70
59.00
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
f
Com, Silage
20.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
532789
Database Version 3.1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
Date Printed 5/11/2013
PCS Page 1 of 4

Planned Crops Summary
P2O5
Tract
Field
Acres
Acres
Rating
LI
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
Removal
(lbs/acre)
Applied
(lbs/acre)
4325
Ba 4
52.10
50.50
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
Com, Silage
20.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
4325
Ba 6
24.10
24.00
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
92 Tons
N/A
N/A
Com, Silage
20.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
4325
Ba 8
33.90
33.90
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
•
Com, Silage
20.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
4325 _
Bu 1
5.50
5.00
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
Com, Silage
20.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
4325
Bu 2
49.90
49.40
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
r
Com, Silage
20.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
4325
Bu 4
19.00
19.00
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
Corn, Silage
20.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
4325
Bu 6
3.50
3.50
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
Corn, Silage
20.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
4325
CAB
12.20
10.00
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
N/A
N/A
Com, Silage
20.9 Tons
N/A
N/A
n 4'lc
Dr-,1
1L �ln
,
„
_
Tr/A
1.T/A
mall Gram, Silage
.z ton
N/A
1
om age
4325 KE 1 1 6.70J 6.00p Medium 1 15.0 1 Lloyd
532789 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 5/11/2013
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tonsl N/A I N/A
PCS Page 2 of 4

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
l.. seable
Acres
Plat
Rating
LI
Soil Series
CropSequenceRYE
P205
Removal
(lbs/ac7e)
Applied
(lbs/acre)
-
_
r
Corn, Silage
20.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
4325
KE 2
10.60
9.60
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
,
Corn, Silage
20.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
4325
KE 3
11.20
10.00
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
L
Com, Silage
20.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
4325
LYN
15.80
15.80
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
_
Com, Silage
20.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
4325
MO 1
17.70
17.40
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
Corn, Silage
20.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
4325
MO 2
5.00
4.50
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
N/A
N/A
,
y
Corn, Silage
20.9 Tons
N/A
N/A
4325
MO 3
6.30
6.30
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
Corn, Silage
20.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
4325
PR 5
10.60
10.60
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
Corn, Silage
20.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
4325
WH 1
27.80
25.00
Medium
15.0 ...
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
N/A
N/A
Corn, Silage
20.9 Tons
N/A
T N/A
4325
WI 1
51.80
51.80
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
Corn, Silage '
20.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
4325
WI 2
46.20
46.20
Medium
15.0
Lloyd
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
Corn, Silage
20.2 Tons
N/A
N/A
PLAN TOTALS:
532789
858.50 825.30
Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 5/11/2013
PCS Page 3 of 4
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.

LI
<2
Potential Leaching
Low potential to contribute to soluble
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
Technical Guidance
None
>= 2 &
<= 10
> 10
Moderate potential to contribute to
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
I i igh potential to contribute to soluble
i itrient leaching below the root zone.
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(328), Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
PLAT Index
Rating
P Management Recommendation
0 - 25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
25 - 50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
> 100
Very High
Starter P application only
532789
Database Version 3.1
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
Date Printed 5/11/2013
PCS Page 4 of 4

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number __,;res of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
'
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A) .
[Comm.
Fert,
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res. I
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N .
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
140
1
U3
Cecil
18.00
17.40
Small Grain, Silage
9.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
107
0
0
Broad,
107
13.08
0.00
227,56
0.00
140
1
U3
Cecil
18.00
17.40
Corn, Silage
20.0
2/15-6/30
218
0
0
Broad.
218
26.65
0.00
463.62
0.00
140
2
U3
Cecil
34.70
32.40
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
A
112
13.69
0.00
443.53
0.00
140
2
U3
Cecil
34.70
32.40
Corn, Silage
21.2
2/15-6/30
231
0
0
Broad.
231
28.23
0.00
914.78
0.00
4255
1
U3
Cecil
44.60
39.50
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad,
112
13.69
0.00
540.72
0.00
4255
1
U3
/Cecil
44.60
39.50
Corn, Silage
21.2
2/15-6/30
231
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
1,062.13
0.00
4255
2
U3
Cecil
22.90
21.20
Small Grain, Silage
10.1
9/1-3/31
112
0
0
Broad.
112
13.69
0.00
290.21
0.00
4255
2
U3
Cecil
22.90
21.20
Corn, Silage
21.2
2/15-6/30
231
0
0
Broad,
220
26.89
0.00
570.06
0.00
4255
3
U3
Cecil
8.70
7.50
Small Grain, Silage
8.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
1 98
0
0
Broad.
98
11.98
0.00
89.84
0.00
4255
3
U3
Cecil
8.70
7.50
Corn, Silage
18.4
2/15-6/30
201
0
0
Broad.
201
24.57
0.00
184.25
0.00
4255
4
U3
Wilkes
1.90
1.90
Small Grain, Silage
4.9 Tons
9/1-3/31
61
0
0
Broad.
61
7.46
0.00
14.17
0.00
4255
4
U3
Wilkes
1.90
1.90
Corn, Silage
8.4 Tons
2/15-6/30
101
0
0
Broad.
101
12.35
0.00
23,46
0.00
4255
5
U3
Lloyd
3.80
3.80
Small Grain, Silage
8.0 Tons
9/1-3/31
89
0
0
Broad.
89
10.88
0.00
w
41.34
0.00
4255
5
U3
Lloyd
3.80!
3.80
Corn, Silage
17.6
2/15-6/30
192
0
0
Broad.
192
23.47
0.00
89.18
0.00
4325
AC 1
U3
Lloyd
18.00
18.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
224.40
0.00
4325
AC 1
U3
Lloyd
18.00
18.00
Com, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
484.01
0.00
532789 Database Version 3.1
Date Printed: 5/11/2013
WUT Page 1 of 5

Waste Util.
3n Table
'ear 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquia
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4325
AC 2
U3
Lloyd
9.30
9.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
9/1-3/31
105
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
115.94
0.00
4325
AC 2
U3
Lloyd
9.30
9.30
Corn, Silage
20.9
2/15-6/30
*220
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
250.07
0.00
4325
AND 1
U3
Lloyd
17.40
17.40
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
216.92
0.00
4325
AND 1
U3
Lloyd
17.40
17.40
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
467.88
0.00
4325
AND 2
U3
Lloyd
14.20
13.70
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
170.80
0.00
4325
AND 2
U3
Lloyd
14.20
13.70
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0 i
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
368.38
0.00
4325
Ba 1
U3
Lloyd
36.70
35.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
436.34
0.00
4325
Ba 1
U3
Lloyd
36.70
35.00
Corn, Silage
A-
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
941.13
0.00
4325
Ba 2
U3
Lloyd
29.90
28.50
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
355.31
0.00
4325
Ba2
U3
Lloyd
29.90
28,50
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
766.35
0,00
4325
Ba 3
U3
Lloyd
59.70
59.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
735.55
0.00
4325
Ba 3
U3
Lloyd
59.70
59.00
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
1,586.47
0.00
4325
Ba 4
U3
Lloyd
52.10
50.50
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
629.58
0.00
4325
Ba 4
U3
Lloyd
52.10
50.50
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
1,357.91
0.00
4325
Ba 6
U3
Lloyd
24.10
24.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
299.21
0.00
4325
Ba 6
U3
Lloyd
24.10
24.00
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
645.35
0.00
4325
Ba 8
U3
Lloyd
33.90
33.90
Small Grain; Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
422.63
0.00
4325
Ba 8
U3
Lloyd
33.90
33.90
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
911.55
0.00
4325
Bu 1
U3
Lloyd
5.50
5.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
62.33
0.00
4325
Bu 1
U3
Lloyd
5.50
5.00
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
134.45
0.00
4325
Bu 2
U3
Lloyd
49.90
49.40
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
615.87
0.00
4325
Bu 2
U3
Lloyd
49.90
49.40
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
1,328.34
0.00
532789 Database Version 3.1
Date Printed: 5/11/2013
WUT Page 2 of 5

Waste UtiL
an Table
ear 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid -
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4325
Bu 4
U3
Lloyd
19.00
19.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad,
102
12.47
0.00
236.87
0.00
4325
Bu 4
U3
Lloyd
19.00
19.00
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
510.90
0.00
4325
Bu 6
U3
Lloyd
3.50
3.50
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
43.63
0.00
4325
Bu 6
U3
Lloyd
3.50
3.50
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
94.11
0.00
4325
CAB
U3
Lloyd
12.20
10.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
9/1-3/31
105
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
124,67
0.00
4325
CAB
U3
Lloyd
12.20
10.00
Corn, Silage
20.9
2/15-6/30
228
0
0
Broad,
220
26.89
0.00
268.89
0.00
4325
FC 1
U3
Lloyd
16.20
15.50
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12,47
0,00
193.24
0.00
4325
FC 1
U3
Lloyd
16.20
15.50
Com, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
.220
26.89
0.00
416.79
0.00
4325
FC 2
U3
Lloyd
3.00
2.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
109
0
0
Broad.
97
11.86
0.00
23.71
0.00
r
4325
FC 2
U3
Lloyd
3.00
2.00
Com, Silage
21.6
2/15-6/30
235
0
0
Broad.
208
25.42
0.00
50.85
0.00
4325
FC 3
U3
Lloyd
26.20
26.20
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
326.63
0.00
4325
FC 3
U3
Lloyd
26.20
26.20
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
704.50
0.00
4325
GM 1
U3
Lloyd
7.60
6.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
9/1-3/31
105
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
74,80
0.00
4325
GM 1
U3
Lloyd
7.60
6.00
Corn, Silage
20.9
2/15-6/30
228
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
161.34
0.00
4325
JF 1
U3
Lloyd
3.90
3.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
9/1-3/31
105
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
37.40
0,00
4325
JF 1
U3
Lloyd
3.90
3.00
Corn, Silage
20.9
2/15-6/30
228
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0,00
80.67
0.00
4325
JF 2
U3
Lloyd
6.00
5.50
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
68.57
0.00
4325
JF 2
U3
Lloyd
6.00
5.50
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
147.89
0.00
4325
JF 3
U3
Lloyd
8.50
7.50
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
9/1-3/31
105
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
93.50
0.00
4325
JF 3
U3
Lloyd
8.50
7.50
Corn, Silage
20.9
2/15-6/30
228
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
201.67
0.00
4325
JTG 1
U3
Lloyd
24.50
24.50
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
305.44
0.00
4325
JTG 1
U3
Lloyd
24.50
24.50
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad,
220
26.89
0.00
658.79
0.00
532789 Database Version 3.1
Date Printed: 5/11/2013
WUT Page 3 of 5

Waste Util,
Jn Table
ear 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Pert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Ligmo 1
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1000
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4325
JTG 2
U3
Lloyd
11.50
11.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
.
102
0
0
Broad.
102!
12.47
0.00
137.14
0.00
4325
JTG 2
U3
Lloyd
11.50
11.00
Com, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220.
26.89
0.00
295.78
0.00
4325
JTG 3
U3
Lloyd
21.40
21.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102.
12.47
0.00
261,81
0.00
4325
JTG 3
U3
Lloyd
21.40
21.00
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220.
26.89
0.00
564.68
0.00
4325
KE 1
U3
Lloyd
6.70
6.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
I
102
12.47
0.00
74.80
0.00
4325
KE 1
U3
Lloyd
6.70
6.00
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220•
26.89
0.00
161,34
0.0 J
4325
KE 2
U3
Lloyd
10,60
9.60
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
T
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
119.68
0.00
4325
KE 2
U3
Lloyd
10.60
9.60
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220•
26.89
0.00
258.14
0.00
4325
KE 3
U3
Lloyd
11.20
10.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
124.67
0.00
4325
KE3
U3
Lloyd
11.20
10.00
Com, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
268.89
0.00
4325
LYN
U3
Lloyd
15.80
15.80
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
196.98
0.00
4325
LYN
U3
Lloyd
15.80
15.80
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220.
26.89
0.00
424.85
0.00
4325
MO 1
U3
Lloyd
17.70
17.40
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
216.92
0.00
4325
MO 1
U3
Lloyd
17.70
17.40
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
467.88
0.00
4325
MO 2
U3
Lloyd
5.00
4.50
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
9/1-3/31
105
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
56.10
0.00
4325
MO 2
U3
Lloyd
5.00
4.50
Corn, Silage
20.9
2/15-6/30
228
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
121.00
0.00
4325
MO 3
U3
Lloyd
6.30
6.30
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
78.54
0.00
4325
MO 3
U3
Lloyd
6.30
6.30
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00'
169.40
0.00
4325
PR 5
U3
Lloyd
10.60
10.60
Small Grain, Silage
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
132.15
0.00
4325
PR 5
U3
Lloyd
10.60
10.60
Corn, Silage
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
285.03
0.00
4325
WH 1
U3
Lloyd
27.80
25.00
Small Grain, Silage
9.5 Tons
9/1-3/31
105
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0.00
311.67
0.00
4325
WH 1
U3
Lloyd
27.80
25.00
Com, Silage
20.9
2/15-6/30
228
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
672.23
0.00
532789 Database Version 3.1
Date Printed: 5/11/2013
WUT Page 4 of 5

Waste Util
on Table
Tract
Field
4325
WII
4325
WI1
4325
WI 2
4325
WI 2
Source
ID
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use,
Acres
Crop
U3
Lloyd
51.80
51.80
Small Grain, Silage
U3
Lloyd
51.80
51.80
Corn, Silage
U3
Lloyd
46.20
46.20
Small Grain, Silage
U3
Lloyd
46.20
46.20
Com, Silage
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned.
'ear 1
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Reqd
(lbs/A)
Comm
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManureA
pplied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
N
1003
gal/A
Tons
1000 gals
tons
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
i
0
0
Broad.
.r
102
12.47
- v
0.00
645.79
0.00
20.2
2/15-6/30
_ 22,0
0
0
Broad,
220
26.89
0.00
1,392.87
0.00
9.2 Tons
9/1-3/31
102
0
0
Broad.
102
12.47
0,00
575.97
0.00
20.2
2/15-6/30
220
0
0
Broad.
220
26.89
0.00
1,242,29
0.00
Total Applied,
1000 gallons
32,563.02
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
8,438.00
Balance, 1000 gallons
-24,125.02
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tons
0.00
Balance, tonsv
0.00
2. Symbol * means user entered data.
532789 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/11/2013 WUT Page 5 of 5

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Source Name
Koopman Dairy Fox._ Farm_2013
Design Storage Capaci1 (Days)
Start Date
9/1
120
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days) *
1
1
89
1
2
120
1
3
89
1
4
120
1
5
120
1
6
120
1
7
89
1
8
58
1
9
57
1
10
120
1
11
120
1
12
89
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
532789 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-11-2013 Capacity Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
532789 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/11/2013 Specification Page 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
532789 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/11/2013 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
532789 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/11/2013 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
532789 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/11/2013 Specification Page 4

Nutrient Management Plan
The 2005 Plan is updated In 2013. T =2G"tt(sot at ,.
dairy) was used as tract In 2005 nutrO nl ,7,`
management plan. The 2013 update k:ees eto aptne
fields as 2005 plan plus two addition "II tracts. Sea
reference showing GPS field no. In 0."'plan arid ttw.
FSA field numbers.
Tract 4325 used In 2005 plan for the ;Matins; rich_+a.
T2791 - GM 1
T2860 - CAB
T2917 - WI 1, WI 2
T2942 - PR 5
T4036 - JTG 1, JTG 2, JTG 3
T4050 - MO 1, MO 2, MO 3
T4069 - Be 1, Ba 2, Be 3, Ba 4, Ba 6, =a 8
T4078 - Bu 1, Bu 2, Su 4, Bu 6
T4135-JF 1, JF 2, JF3
T4136-FC3
T4275 - AC 1, AC 2
T4290 - KE 3
T4308 - FC 1
T4313-WH1
T5437 - AND 1, AND 2
T8625 - FC 2
Tracts added in 2013 update
T4255.1, 2, 3, 4, 5
T140. 1, 2
•
TH.
J
1
Scale -1 " — 2200'
,Ra
',rood
T4050,
r
f
Koopman Dairy
Iredell County, North Carolina
Fox Farm -Application Fields
Waste Management System
KOOPMAN DAIRIES
1REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ow
SCB
5.2013
Checked -
apw"wd er.
nde
eat
OreMnB Am N-n
Nutrient

Obvious Threat
Impending Threat
Complete structural failure;
full or partial loss of a Waste
Storage Pond wall resulting in a
release of waste
Structural damage from
overtopping; leakage or seepage
from base or sidewalls of Waste
Storage Pond; waste discharging
from underground tiles
Failure to immediately address
these may result in complete
structural failure
Other Discharges
Lack of Storage
Capacity
1. If there is any potential threat to life or
property, contact 911 or Sheriffs Dept.
2. Report failure to Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) - provide operation name, location,
problem, time of spill, hone number for
return calls & registration/certification
number
3. Make all attempts to stop the discharge and
contain the waste on the farm
4.. Contact the technical specialist who
certified the Waste Storage Pond
CONTACTS
Sheriff — 704-878-3180
DWQ at 704-663-1699,
or Emergency Management at 704-878-
5353
Local Contractor — Marvin Church
Grading
459 Fairmount Rd.
Statesville, NC 28625
704-876-4369
Tech. Spec. — 704-873-6761, ext. 3
1. Report failure to DWQ provide same
information as above
2. Make all attempts to stop the discharge;
reinforce weak area of structure until a
technical specialist can assess situation
Runoff from spray fields, broken
pipes, leaking pumps, discharges
from houses and other
maintenance deficiencies
Anticipated single storm events
exceeding 25 yr.24 hr. frequency
such as approaching hurricanes;
Or extended rainfall periods
resulting in waste water levels
above the start pump marker
1. If waste is leaving property use same
contacts as for the previous category
2. Address maintenance deficiencies
1. Contact DWQ for regulatory approval for
emergency pumping
DWQ at 704-663-1699
or After Hours Emergency at 919-733-
3942
Tech. Spec. — 704-873-6761, ext. 3
Local Contractor— Marvin Church
Grading
704-876-4369
Same as for "Impending Threat" category
DWQ at 704-663-1699

Waste Storage Overflow
* Add soil to berm to increase
elevation of dam
* Pump wastes to fields at an
acceptable rate
* Stop all additional flow to the
lagoon (waterers)
* Call a pumping contractor
* Make sure no surface water
is entering lagoon
Runoff From Waste
Application Field
* Immediately stop waste
application
* Create a temporary diversion
or berm to contain the waste
on the field
* Incorporate waste to reduce
further runoff
Leakage From Waste
Distribution System
* Stop recycle (flushing
system) pump
Leakage From Base or
Sidewall of Storage Pond
* Stop irrigation pump
* Close valves to eliminate
further discharge
* Separate pipes to create an
air gap and stop flow
* Dig a small well or ditch to
catch all seepage, put in
submersible pump, and pump
back into Waste Storage Pond
* If holes are caused by
burrowing animals, trap or
remove animals and fill holes
and compact with a clay type
soil
* Other holes may be likewise
temporarily plugged with clay
soil

Source
Farmstead
Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Cause
• Dairy production
Paved lots or barn • Wet manure -covered
alley surfaces ' surfaces
Bedded areas
BMPs to Minimize Odor
d Vegetative or wooded buffers
[i Recommended best management practices
of Good judgment and common sense
• Scrape or flush daily
Q' Promote drying with proper ventilation
d Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Site Specific Practices
• Urine d Promote drying with proper ventilation
• Partial microbial NI' Replace wet or manure -covered bedding
decomposition
Manure dry stacks • Partial microbial
decomposition
❑ Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
Storage tank or • Partial microbial ❑ Bottom or mid -level loading
basin surface decomposition ❑ Tank covers
• Mixing while filling ❑ Basin surface mats of solids
• Agitation when emptying 621 Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
GI Agitate only prior to manure removal
I3' Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin • Partial microbial ❑ Liquid drainage from settled solids
surfaces decomposition ❑ Remove solids regularly
Manure, slurry, or
sludge spreader
outlets
• Mixing while filling
• Agitation when emptying
• Agitation when spreading ❑ Soil injection of slurry/sludges
• Volatile gas emissions
Wash residual manure from spreader after use
Proven biological additives or oxidants
AMOC - T' 'venibcr 11, 1996, page 1

Source
Uncovered manure,
slurry, or sludge on
field surfaces
Flush tanks
Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Cause
• Volatile gas emissions while
drying
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
liquid while tanks are filling
BMPs to Minimize Odor
CI Soil injection of slurry/sludges
O Soil incorporation within 48 hours
Nit Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
511 Proven biological additives or oxidants
D Flush tank covers
D Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
Site Specific Practices
Outside drain •
collection or junction
boxes
Agitation during wastewater
conveyance
0 Box covers
Lift stations
Agitation during sump tank
.filling and drawdown
O Sump tank covers
End of drainpipes at
lagoon
• Agitation during wastewater
conveyance
O Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces
• Volatile gas emission
• Biological mixing
• Agitation
0 Proper lagoon liquid capacity
O Correct lagoon startup procedures
O Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio
0 Minimum agitation when pumping
0 Mechanical aeration
0 Proven biological additives
irrigation sprinkler
nozzles
• High pressure agitation
• Wind drift
O Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
0 Minimum recommended operating procedure
0 Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
O Pump from second -stage lagoon
Cl Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
AMOC - Tt .. vember l I, 1996, page 2

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odor Control Chad '-list
Source Cause
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition
Standing water • Improper drainage
around facilities
• Microbial decomposition of
organic matter
Mud tracked onto • Poorly maintained access
public roads from roads
farm access
Additional Information:
BMPs to Minimize Odor
54 Proper disposition of carcasses
Site Specific Practices
Grade and landscape such that water drains away
from facilities
Farm access road maintenance
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP Packet
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System —Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory; EBAE 209-95
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO 107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
Available From :
NCSU, County Extension Center
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
Florida Cooperative Extension
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 3

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source
Cause BMPs to Control Insects
Flush gutters • Accumulation of solids
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids
Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation
growth.
Liquid Systems
C7 Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as
designed
O Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
O Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth ofno more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
d
Site Specific Practices
Sir Maintain vegetative control along banks of
lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems
F- eeders • Feed spillage Desigm, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage
Si Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7 to 10-
day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day interval
during winter)
AMJC - November 11, 1996, page 1

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed L Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
I
products)
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed
Animal holding areas • Accumulations of animal L1 Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
wastes and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal
LMaintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed)
Dry manure handling • Accumulationsof animal CRemove spillhge on a routine basis (e.g.,
systems wastes 7- to 10-day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
IA Provide for adequate drainage around manure
, stockpiles
la Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling; areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.
AM] C - November 1 1 , 1996,.page 2

Version —November 26, 2018
i ortality management Methods
Indicate which method(s) will be implemented.
When selecting multiple methods indicate a primary versus secondary option.
Methods other than those listed must be approved by the State Veterinarian.
Primary Secondary Routine Mortality
El El
El El
` 1 I�
El E
El El
L J
aEJ
Burial three feet beneath' the surface of the ground within 24 hours of knowledge of animal
death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water
(G.S.106-403). The bottom of the burial pit should be at least one foot above the seasonal
high water table. Attach burial location map and plan.
Landfill at municipal solid waste facility permitted by NC DEQ under GS 15A NCAC
13B .0200.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 10€-168.7
Complete incineration according to 02 NCAC 52C .0102.
A composting system approved and permitted by the NC Department of Agriculture & Con-
sumer Services Veterinary Division (attach copy of permit). If compost is distributed off -farm,
additional requirements must be met and a permit is required from NC DEQ.
In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the
NC Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services (G.S. 106-549.70).
Any method which, in the professional opiniontof the State Veterinarian, would make possible
the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health.
(Written approval by the State Veterinarian must be attached).
Mass Mortality Plan
Mass mortality plans are required for farms covered by an NPDES permit. These plans are
also recommended for all animal operations. This plan outlines farm -specific mortality man-
agement methods to be used for mass mortality. The NCDA&CS Veterinary Division sup-
ports a variety of emergency mortality disposal options; contact the Division for guidance.
• A catastrophic mortality.disposal plan is part of the facility's CAWMP and is activated
when numbers of dead animals exceed normal mortality rates as specified by the State
Veterinarian.
• Burial must be -done in accordance with NC General Statutes and NCDA&CS Veterinary
Division regulations and guidance.
• Mass burial sites are subject to additional permit conditions (refer to facility's animal
waste management system permit).
• In the event of imminent threat of a disease emergency, the State Veterinarian may enact
additional temporary procedures or measures for disposal according to G.S. 106-399.4.
Sign , e of Farm Owner/Manager
Signature of Technical Specialist
Date
Date

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
05-11-2013
This plan has been prepared for:
Koopman Dairies Inc.
Ard Koopman
204 Lloyd Road
Statesville, NC 28625
704-929-0659
(Fe ( )
This plan has been developed by:
Sam Bingham
Engineer
845 Baber Rd
Rutherfordton, NC 28139
828-429-6798
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
1
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: 4'4 6-
Technical Specialist Si
532789 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 05-11-2013 Cover Page 1

D. Size of Waste Storage Pond
Pond surveyed and volumes and surface areas determined in 1999 by NRCS
Top of Dam minus Emergency Spillway Elevation - 1.5'
Surface Area at top of dam - 72,390 sq ft
Surface Area just below ESW - 66,197 sq ft
A check in 2013 based on current aerial photography indicated that
surface area at top of dam is the same.
The maximum storage volume (pump out marker) is located 0.8' below the
ESW. The pond volume available for waste storage 2.3 feet below top of
dam and the volume 11.0 feet below top of dam are shown below.
Volume 2.3 feet below top of dam - 602,155 cu ft
Volume 11.0 feet below top of dam - 154,980 cu ft
Surface Area at TOD 72,390
TOD to ESW - 1.5'
Max. marker below ESW - 0.8'
Available waste storage is located above the 11' pond depth and below
the pump marker. This volume is estimated to be 602,155 - 154,980 or
447,175 cu ft. The volume greater than 11' deep is available for
solids accumulations.
NOTE: The actual storage period is between 4 and 5 months. An
estimate is 447,175 cu ft/(370,881 cu ft/4 months) or 4.8 months.
Koopman Fox Dairy . 10 Update 2013

E. Acceptance of Existing Waste Storage Pond
A previous landowner constructed the dam without assistance from
the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). The dam does not
meet NRCS minimum standards for waste storage pond embankments.
Volume measurements were made by NRCS to determine the storage
period.
NRCS used NC 0.200 regulations, which allowed the technical
specialist, designated by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission to
accept existing dams if the existing embankment did not appear to be
unstable and it did not appear there is excessive seepage from the
structure.
Excessive seepage was not noticed in NRCS's investigation of the
dam. A hazard classification was made and it was determined that the
hazard below the structure was low from a sudden failure.
NRCS assumed no responsibility and made no recommendation on
maintaining the existing embankment. NRCS provided no certification
that the embankment meets the North Carolina Dam Safety Law of 1967.
IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
Clean water diversions shall be maintained around waste storage
pond. Diversions shall be maintained to carry the 25 year - 24 hour
runoff plus capacity to store some sediment.
B. Guttering
Clean water shall be excluded to the fullest extent possible by
guttering. Most of the buildings are guttered.
V. Waste Nutrients
Waste will be stored in waste storage pond for 4 months plus.
During the course of one year, the waste storage ponds will store
8,438,000 gallons of waste.
Sand is removed daily and placed in sand storage area. It is
estimated that 6,570 tons are removed every year. This sand is reused
at dairy.
Waste Storage Pond
N
P205
K20
TOTAL NUTRIENTS
155,454 lb
97,714 lb
146,571 lb
Koopman Fox Dairy
DISPOSAL LOSSES AVAILABLE NUTRIENT
(Plant Available Nutrient - PAN)
0.44 68,400 lb
0.70 68,400 lb
0.70 102,600 lb
8.1 lb N PAN per 1000 gal
11 Update 2013

VIII. Operation and Maintenance Requirements
The waste management system will keep pollutants out of
the streams and rivers if the 25 yr -24 hr storage capacity
is maintained in the waste storage ponds and diversions for
clean water and,polluted runoff are maintained around the
system.
Before the waste storage pond reaches the high level
mark set at each pond, the storage pond shall be emptied. A
post will be set with its top at this elevation. See pond
design computations above for each pond high level
elevation.
Vegetation around the waste storage pond shall be mowed
annually and eroded areas patched. Fencing shall be checked
and repaired as required.