360006_Permit Renewal Application 2019_20190410

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Animal Waste Management Systems
Request for Certification of Coverage
Facility Currently covered by an Expiring Sate Non-Discharge General Permit
On September 30, 2019, the North Carolina State Non-Discharge General Permits for Animal Waste Management Systems will
expire. As required by these permits, facilities that have been issued Certificates of Coverage to operate under these State
Non-Discharge General Permits must apply for renewal at least 180 days prior to their expiration date. Therefore, all applications
must be received by the Division of Water Resources by no later than April 3,2019.
Please do not leave any question unanswered Please verify all information and make any necessary corrections below.
Application must be signed and dated by the Permittee.
1. Farm Number: 36-0006 Certificate Of Coverage Number: AWC360006
2. Facility Name: Proctor Dairy
3. Landowner's Name(same as on the Waste Management Plan): Mary H Proctor
4. Landowner's Mailing Address: 112 Hub Carpenter Rd
City: Bessemer City State: NC Zip: 28016-7705
Telephone Number: 704-922-7211 Ext. E-mail:
5. Facility's Physical Address: 112 Hub Carpenter Rd
City: Bessemer City State: NC Zip: 280167705
6. County where Facility is located: Gaston
7. Farm Manager's Name(if different from Landowner): Larry Proctor
8_ Farm Manager's telephone number(include area code):
9. Integrator's Name(if there is not an Integrator,write"None"):
10. Operator Name(OIC): Mary H.Proctor Phone No.: 704-922-7211 OIC#: 21629
11. Lessee's Name(if there is not a Lessee,write"None"):
12. Indicate animal operation type and number:
Current Permit: Operations Type Allowable Count
Cattle-Dairy Calf 14
Cattle-Dry Cow 33
Cattle-Dairy Heifer 39
Cattle-Milk Cow 225
Operation Tunes:
Swine Cattle Dry Poultry Other Types
Wean to Finish Dairy Calf Non Laying Chickens Horses-Horses
Wean to Feeder Dairy Heifer Laying Chickens Horses-Other
Farrow to Finish Milk Cow Pullets Sheep-Sheep
Feeder to Finish Dry Cow Turkeys Sheep-Other
Farrow to Wean Beef Stocker Calf Turkey Pullet
Farrow to Feeder Beef Feeder
Boar/Stud Beef Broad Cow Wet Poultry
Gilts Other Non Laying Pullet
Other Layers

13. Waste Treatment and Storage Lagoons (Verify the following information is accurate and complete. Make all necessary
corrections and provide missing data.)
Design.
Estimated Liner Type Estimated Freeboard
Structure Date (Clay,Synthetic, Capacity Surface Area "Redline"
Name Built Unknown) (Cubic Feet) (Square Feet) (Inches)
PUSH-OFF P q LA �r q�a/�/x 2 ?#a—
RUN-OFF �' �J �� ��-t ;2-aL /.
Mail one (1) copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWN1P) with this completed and signed application
as required by NC General Statutes 143-215.10C(d)to the address below.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
1. The most recent Waste Utilization Plan(WUP),signed by the owner and a certified technical specialist,containing:
a. The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields(e.g.irrigation,injection,etc.)
b. A map of every field used for land application(for example:irrigation map)
c. The soil series present on every land application field
d. The crops grown on every land application field.
e. The Realistic Yield Expectation(RYE)for every crop shown in the WUP
f The maximum PAN to be applied to every land application field
g. The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
b. The required NRCS Standard specifications
2. A site map/schematic
3. Emergency Action Plan
4. Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
5. Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
6. Mortality Control Checklist with selected method noted-Use the enclosed updated Mortality Control Checklist
7. Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.) Please be sure the above table is accurate and
complete. Also provide any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to
your facility.
8. Operation and Maintenance Plan
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal.
(e.g.composting,digesters,waste transfers,etc.)
As a second option to mailing paper copies of the application package, you can scan and email one signed copy of the
application and all the CAWMP items above to: [e-mail]

I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that,
if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not
included,this application package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false statement,
representation, or certification. in any application may be subject to civil. penalties up to $25,000 per violation. (.18 U.S.C.
Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both for
a similar offense.)
Printed Name of Signing Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all landowners should sign. If Landowner is a
corporation,signature should be by a principal executive officer of the corporation):
Name: r 1 L I A/ Title: _ ow 14
-1 Signature: �U-� � �.�Us-f��j� Date:
Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NCDEQ-DNVR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number:[phone]
E-mail:2019PermitRenewal@ncden r.gov
FORM: RENEWAL-STATE GENERAL 0212019

RECEI4 ��l� ' -WR
Roy otOM ... .
MICHAELS.REGAN �: �, - :=� APR 10 2019
L OA oir1LPEPPice t+1C312TH Q«AItOLINA waterQuality
lurftlw Enytranmental wry Regional operadons_ga don
February 26,2019
Mary H Proctor
Proctor Dairy
112 Hub Carpenter Rd
Bessemer City,NC 28016-7705
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring State General Permit
Dear Permittee:
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation State Non-Discharge General Permits,
which expire on September 30, 2019. Copies of the new animal waste operation. State Non-:Discharge General Permits are available
at https://dm.nc.gov/about/divisions,water-resources/watgpAuality-regional-operations/afo,or by writing or calling:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number:(91.9)707-9100
In order to assure your continued coverage under the State Non-Discharge General Permits, you must submit an application for
permit coverage to the Division. Enclosed you will find a "Request for Certificate of Coverage Facility Currently Covered by an
Expiring State Non-Discharge General Permit." The application form must be completed, signed and returned by Aril 3 2019..
Please note that you must include one f 11 copv of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan [CAWMPI with the
completed and signed application form. A list of items included in the CAWMP can be found on page 2 of the renewal
application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to$25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the State Non-Discharge General Permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feet
free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Branch staff at 919-707-9100.
Sincerely,
Jon Risgaard,Section Chief
Animal Feeding Operations and Groundwater Section
Enclosures
cc(w/o enclosures): Mooresville Regional Office,Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Gaston County Soil and Water Consemation District
AFOG Section Central Files- ,1 WC360006
K:rtt"sn -s Dapartr ert of E- -eructs Qua t} I D'i+ 3r of Water Ifesn�..nes
512 ,5a'_ct.4jy St.[ M6 Vs' v'ze ZerteT 14s &. Xzrt Zwe'-a 276 -1636

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
ENGINEERING DESIGN WORK SHEET
DESIGNED BY )�E
DATE' 14FGI ly7
FIELD OFFICE: DALLAS,PIC
OWNER'S NAME' PROCTOR DAIRY
ADDRESS
CITY.STATE,ZIP:
Attach Watershed Location Sketch)
POPULATION(Est)WITHIN 114 MILE'
NO OF INHABITED HOUSES WITHIN 114 MILE:
DISTANCE TO NEAREST INHABITED HOUSE.
(Olirot tlian urwtatui's(cause)
TYPE OF OPERATION
TYPE OF CONFINEMENT FACILITY
TYPE OF WASTE TREATMENT: (Check one)
WASTE STORAGE POND
PIT OR TANK
OTI ICR
METHOD OF HANDLING WASTE
(When design capacity is reached)
DESIGN DATA FOR WASTE STORAGE POND 81
NUMBER,OF ANIMALS SERVED BY POND •Q()
DESIGN PERIOD (days) fl44Q
(Longest anticipated period before pump-out)
25-YEAR STORM: (inches) Its
(See:EFM,Chapter 2)Runoff for CN 95 4 9i
WASTE PRODUCTION: (Oallonsc1grylarnmal) 1d.00
(See Tech Guide,Sec IV,35"Lagoon Standards)
WASKDOWNWATER: (Gallons/cow/day) �•�
PERCENT WASTE COLLECTED 76.00
STORAGE FOR WASTE-WASTE WATER -
NORMAL RUNOFF
1. VOLUME OF WASTE (No of animals)X(Gallons/ Gallons of WastelanimaUday Num of Animals Storage Period %Collected Volume tuft
day4admaV7A8K#of days in storage period)=CUFT 14.00 225.00 60.00 75.00 18950.53 CU.FT.
2. VOLUME OF WASTE WATER:
GaNnnslenimatfdeyn.48Xstnrage period 3.00 225 n0 60.110 5414-44 CU.FT.
3.VOLUME OF NORMAL RUNOFF, 970:30 CU.FT.
4.SUB TOTAL 2533527 CUFT,
4.25YR-24HR RAINFALL RUNOFF. 1425.86 CU.FT.
TOTAL VOLUME: 2676-1 1,1 CU.FT.
5.DEPTH OF RAINFALL LESS EVAPORATION 0.37 FEET
6 25YR-24HR RAINFALL ON POND SURFACE OA6 FEET
7.FREEBOARD IM FEET
TOTAL DEPTH LESS NORMAL STORAGE 1.82 FEET
MONTH fJOf MAL SURFACE UNSURrACE NORMAL RAINFALL TOTAL
RAINFALL RUNOFF RUNOFF EVAPOR. LESS FOR.
PERCENT DEPTH PERCENT DEPTH EVAPOR. PERIOD
JANUARY 3.94 ,�94 52.00 2.05 20.00 0.79 1.70 1,7Q 224 2.24
I-LBRUARY 3.98 bf.UU 2 2f 25.UU 1 UU 1.6U 2.3u U.UU
MARCH 4.63 57.00 2.04 24.00 1.11 3.00 1.63 000
A.PRIL_ 3.45 59.00 2!04 26.00 0,90 3.80 -0.35 0,00
MAY 385 5800 223 24.00 0.92 390 -0 05 0.00
JUNE 3_69 60.00 2.21 2700 1.00 4AO -071 0.00
,ULY 4A4 60.00 2.66 27.00 120 4.30 014 000
AUGUST 4.50 6)00 2.15 3'i.00 •1 40 3.90 0.60 0.00
SEPTET SEER 3.85 67.00 258 3300 1.27 320 0.65 0.00
OrTORFR 3 47 63(10 9 19 3000 1 04 140 107 0 00
NOVEMBER 2.94 59.00 1.73 2600 0.76 170 124 0.00
DECEMBER 3.84 am 59.00 2.27 24.00 0.92 UZ 170 1-TQ 2.14 214
I U 1 AL RJC HtS ryry V.J64 313 INCHLS
TOTALFCCT J FEET
DRAINAGE AREA
SURFACE QA ACRES 4.32 INCHES
DRAINAGE AREA
UNSURFACE tOA ACRES 171 INCHES
VOLUME 784.08 CU.FT- '1186.22 CU.FT.
TOTAL 970.299 CU.FT.

SO4G OF WASTE STORAGE POND Al
TRAPIZOIDIAL SHAPED
VOLUME REQUIRED 25335,27 CU.FT,
SLOPE DEPTH WIDTH LENGTH AREA VOLUME
BOTTOM DIMENSIONS 40M US& 3480.00
MID-SECTION DIMENSIONS Im 3.0 40.00 06.00 4704.00
TOP rAMFNS10NS I FSS RAINFAI 1 1_60 660 58 00 105 00 6090 00 98386 00 01 FT
25335.27 CU.FT.
IUPUIMtNSIONSWIIHRAINFALL t3A 51.55 114.55 ff3fAU 38468.14 CU.I-I.
BOTTOM DIMENSIONS 67.55 114.55 7737AO
NO-SECTION DIMENSIONS Im 0.1 67.85 11485 7792.12
TOP DIMENSIONS WITH NORMAL RUNOFF 1m 0.2 68.15 11515 784701 1558.43 CLI FT.
970.30 CU.FT.
TOP AT 24HR-25YR RAINFALL 7.0 78.38 125.38 0827.70 43633.04 CU FT.
BOTTOM DIMENSIONS AT 68.15 115.15 7847.01
MID-SECTION DIMENSIONS Im 0.4 6695 113.95 7628.50
TOP DIMENSIONS AT MAX L.L. 68.15 115.15 7847.01 6161.07 CU.FT.
f425.85 CU FT
BOTTOM ELEVATION B41 FEET
WASTE&WASTE WATER VOLUME LEVEL 90.7 FEET
STORAGE FOR NORMAL RAINFALL 0.4 FEET
MAXI"LIQUID LEVEL 91.1 FEET
25YR-24HR STORM STORAGE 1.3 FEET
CREST OF EMERGENCY SPILLWAY 92.3 FEET
MAXMUIM FLOW DEPTH 0.0 FEET
FREEBOARD 1.1FEET
SETTLED TOP OF DAM ELEVATION 93.4 FEET

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
FNGTNFFRTNC,nFIglfr+T WORK SRFFT
DESIGNED BY: R6E
DATE 10627197
FIELD OFFICE: DALLAS,NC
OVNT4CR'S NAME' FROCTOR MRy
ADDRESS
CITY,STATE,ZIP'
Attach Watershed Location Sketch)
POPULATION(Est)WITHIN 1N MILE:
NO OF INHABITED HOUSES WITHIN 114 MILE:
DISTANCE TO NEAREST INHABITED HOUSE:
(Other men operator's house)
TYPE OF OPERATION
TYPE Or-CONI-INEMENT FACILITY.'
TYPE OF WASTE TREATMENT (Check one)
WASTE STORAGE POND
PIT OR TANK
OI HLIR
METHOD OF HA14DLING WASTE'
(When design cepecity is reached)
DESIGN DATA FOR WASTE STORAGE POND 112
DRY COWS MILK COWS
NUMBER OF ANIMALS SERVED BY POND 45.00 226.00
DESIGN PERIOD: (doW) 40•00
(I nngmf AntiripAted pArind hAfore pimp-ma)
25-YEAR STORM- (Inches)
(See'EFM,Chapter 2)Runoff for CN 95 4 91
WAS IEPROUIC:1ION: (Gallonsldaylentmal) 14.00 14.00
(See Tech.Guide.Sec.IV,359.4 Lagoon Standards)
WASH-DOWN WATER: (Gallonsicowiday) Q QQ 3.00
PERCENT WASTE COLLECTED ' 24Yu 75%
STORAGE FOR WASTE-WASTE WATER-
NORMAL RUNOFF
1. VOLUME OF WASTE (No.of en(mals)X(Gallons!_ Gallons of WastelenimaVday Num of A.nlma(s Storage Period %Collected Voluma ruff
da0admeV7A8)X(#of days to storage penod)=CUFT 14.00 45.00 90.00 0.20 1516.04 CUFT.
14.00 225.00 40.00 0.75 12633.69 CUFT.
2. VCKUWQO WASILVVAIER:
Galkq-WaNmaVdayr7A8Xstoray9 period 000 4G OO 90.00 100% 0.00 CUFT.
3.00 225 nn 40.00 '100% 3609.63 CU FT.
3 VOLUME OF NORMAL RUNOFF: 2968.98 CU.FT.
TOTAL VOLUME: 20728.34 CUFT.
4.25YP.--24HR RAINFALL RUNOFF: 2317.03 CUFT.
MONTH NORMAI .`;IIRFA(.F IINSIIRFA(7 NORMAI RAINFAII TOTAI
RAINFALL RUNOFF RUNOFF EVAPOR. LESS FOR
PERCENT DEPTH PERCENT DEPTH EVAPOR. PERIOD
JANUARY 3.94 am 52.00 2.05 $4fi 20.00 0.79 Q,ZQ 1.70 UQ 2.24 '2 24
FCORUARY 3.90 am 57.00 2-27 FYI 25.00 1 DO 1.Q4 1.60 10 2.36 230
MARCH 4.63 5700 2.64 24.00 1.11 4.60 0.03 n nn
APRIL 3.45 59.00 2.04 26.00 0.90 3.80 .0.35 0.00
MAY 3.85 58.00 223 24 00 0.92 3.90 -0.05 0.00
JUNE 3.69 60.00 2 21 27.00 100 4.40 -0.71 000
JLA_y 4.44 60.00 2.66 27.00 1.20 4.30 0.14 0.00
AUGUST -1.60 ei.00 2.75 3100 1-10 &W 0.60 0.00
SEPTEMBER 3.85 67.00 2.58 3300 1.27 3.20 0.65 0.00
OCTOBER 3A7 63.00 2.19 30.00 1.04 2.40 1.07 0.00
NOVEMBER 2.94 59.00 1.73 26.00 0.76 1.70 1.24 0.00
DECEMBER 3.84 MIA 59.00 1.21 2& 24.00 0.92 S1n9L 1.70 Z4 2.14 2.14
TOTAL INCHES 11.7E 5 6.76 INCHES
TOTALFEET
0.563333 FEET
DRAINAGE AREA
SUFRFACL Q,1Z ACHLS 6.b9 INCHES
DRA94AGE AREA
UN(SURFACE Q,Q1 ACRES d.71 INCHES
VOLUME 2870.604 CUFT 98,37 CUFT
TOTAL 29 CUFT.
NORMAL
RUNOFF
SW' IG OF WASTE STORAGE POND#2
TRAP17()IDIAI RHAPFO
VOLUME REQUIRED 17759.36 CUFT.
SLOPE-side SLOPE-endULPIH WIUIHI VVIUIH2 LENG111 AREA VOLUME
BOTTOM DIMCNGAONG 10.00 mm %M 1200.00
MID-SECTION DIMENSIONS 2.14 .44 31 23.02 33.02 98.60 2762.77
TOP DIMENSIONS LESS RAINFALL Z.9S2 $,44 U 36.04 46,04 117.20 4809.89 17629.68 59.9.36 CUFT
36 CUFT.
TOP DIMENSIONS WITH RAINFALL 2.10 0.0 30.41 40.41 120,50 5233.90 26626.44 CU.FT
BOTTOM DIMENSIONS 3$A1 48A1 120.5E 5233.00
MD-SECTION DIMENSIONS ?,.14 3,4Q 0.3 $9.67 49.67 122.38 5466.23
TOP DIMENSIONS WITH NORMAL PUNOFF U 40.03 150:03 125,08 $795.76 3MAO CUFT.
zodaDo CUFT.
TOP DIMENWNS VWH 25 Yk RAINFALL 2,10 0.5 42.85 52.65 128.73 6159.86 2653.22 CUFT

BOTTOM DIMENSIONS 42.85 52.85 128.73 6159.86
MID-SECTION DIMENSIONS 2.m 3m 0.6 45.16 55A6 132.03 6622.76
TOP DIMENSIONS AT SPILLWAY 2]Q 13 QQ 2,9_ 47.47 57.47 138.63 7274.05 73'10.57 CUFFT.
23J7.03 CU.FT.
BOTTOM ELEVATION MA FEET
WASTE&WASTE WATER VOLUME LEVEL 88.0 FEET
STORAGE FOR NORMAL RAINFALL 1.2 FEET
MAXIAUM LK=LEVEL 09.2 FEET
26YR-24HR STORM STORAGE 1.6 FEET
CREST OF EMERGENCY SPILLWAY 90.7-FEET
MAXIMUM FLOW DEPTH OA FEET
FREEBOARD 1.0 FEET
SETTLED TOP OF DAM ELEVATION 91.7 FEET
�0 �

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
06-25-2014
This plan has been prepared for: This plan has been developed by:
Proctor Dairy Clifford Dean Parker, Jr.
Mary Proctor Gaston Soil and Water Conservation District
112 Hub Carpenter Rd 1303 Cherryville Hwy
Bessemer City, NC 28016 Dallas, NC 28034
704-922-7211 7 922-4181
eloper Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Both Manure and Fertilizer
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I(we)understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
-2,- ,V 6/2�-
Si= ature(owner) Date
Signature(manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
echnical cialist Signature D e
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 06-25-2014 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan..
S2 Dairy(Milk Cow)Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 2,092,230 gals/year by a 270
animal Dairy(Milk Cow)Liquid Manure Slurry operation.This production facility has
waste storage capacities of approximately 90 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast 13982
Incorporated 20973
Injected 20973
Irrigated 13982
Max Avail. Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Volume Volume Surplus/
PAN(lbs) * Applied (lbs) Deficit(lbs) Applied(Gallons) Deficit(Gallons)
Year 1 13,982 13990 -8 2,093,455 -1,225
Year 2 13,982 13990 -8 2,093,455 -1,225
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: In source ID,S means standard source,U means user defined source.
*Max.Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s)identified in the plan for this source.
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 06-25-2014 Source Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary ofthe crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic
Yield estimates are also provided for each crop,as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index(LI)
and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool(PLAT)Rating are also provided for each field,where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High,any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the
harvested plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT
Rating should receive no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be
recommended in accordance with North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of
P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Total Useable Plat Pl A
Acres Rahn Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE Rival Applied
Tract Field Acres. g Ll p q pbs/acre) (lbs/acre)
1090 1 2.10 2.00 Medium 10.0 Lloyd Fescue Hay 4.8 Ton, 75 N/A
1090 1 2 2.701 2.60 Medium 10.0 j Lloyd Fescue Hay 4.8 Ton 75 N/A
1090 3 6.8 6.70 Medium 10.0 Lloyd rescue Hay 4.8 Ton 75 N/A
1090 4 2AC 2.40 Medium 10.0 Lloyd Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 75 NIA
1090 5 6.4C 6.10 Medium 10.0 Lloyd Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 75 NIA
1112 1 9.3 9.00 Medium 10.0 Lloyd 1'escue Hay 4.8 Ton 75 NtA
11.12 10 29C 1.50 Medium 10.0 Lloyd Fescue Pasture 4.8 Toni 8 NWA
1112 2 1 0.9[ 0.50 Medium 10.0 Lloyd Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 75 N/A
1112 3 5.6 5.61 Medium 10.0 Lloyd Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8 NIA
1112 4 18:2 18.00 Medium 10.0 Lloyd Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8 NIA
1112 5 4.8 4.60 Medium 10.0 Lloyd Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8 N/A
1112 6 8.1( 6.00 Medium 10.0 Lloyd Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8 NIA
1112 7 1.3f, 0.50 Medium 10.0 Lloyd Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8 NfA
1112 8 3.2( 10(j Medium 10.0 Lloyd Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8 NIA
1112 9 1A 1.70 Medium 10.0 Lloyd Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8 NIA
1121 1 2.13 1.70 Low 14.0 Cecil Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 75 NIA
1121 2 11.21 11.21 Medium 14.0 Cecil Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 74 N/A
Oats,Grain 97 bu. 24 NIA
1121 3 3.57 3.57 Medium 14.0 Cecil Com,Silage 21.9 Tons 74 N/A
Oats,Grain 97 bu. 24 N/A
1121 4 23.0 23.08 Medium 14.0 Cecil Com,Silage 21.9 Tons 74 N/A
Oats,Grain 97 bu. 24 N/A
1121 6 8.76 8.761 Medium 14.01 Cecil Com,Silage 21.9 Tons 74 N/A
Oats,Grain 97 bu 24 N/A
1121 7 3.64 2.64 Medium 14.0 Cecil Com,Silage 21.9 Tons74 N/A
Oats,Grain 97 bu_ 24 N/A
2685 11 2-771 2.00 Medium 10.0 Lloyd Fescue Pasture 4.9 To 8 N/A
2685 12 0.7 0.78 Medium 1 10.0 Lloyd Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8 NIA
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed 6/25/2014
PCs Page 1 of 2
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Total Useable Plat P205
Removal Applied
Tract Field Acres Acres Rating LI Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (tbslacre) (lbs/acre)
2685 13 2.05 033 Medium 14.0 Cecil Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8 N/A
2685 1 14 3.9q 3.98 Medium L 14.0 1 it Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8 N/A
2685 15 4.62 3.80 Medium 1 14.0 Cecil Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8 N/A
2685 z 1 Ir i I AlrA a;.. , inn 4.4 T­ 7 N/A
2686 1 10.78 10.78 Medium 8.0 Worsham Fescue Hay 4.0 Tons 63 N/A
2686 10 2.45 2.45 Medium 14.0 Cecil Fescue Pasture 4.6 Tons 7 N/A
2686 11 0.68 0.68 Medium 10.0 Lloyd Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8 N/A
2686 16 25.1[ 23.00 Medium 14.0 Appling Fescue Pasture 5.5 Tons 9 N/A
2686 17 8.96 6.30 Medium 14.0 Appling Fescue Pasture 5.5 Tons 9 N/A
2686 18 2.24 0.60 Low 14.0 Appling Fescue Pasture 5.5 Tons 9 N/A
2686 2 1.00 1.00 Medium 14.0 Tatum Fescue Hay 4.1 Tons 64 N/A
2686 3 2.64 2. Medium 8.0 Worsham Fescue Hay 4.0 Tons 63 N/A
2686 4 5.71 5.71 Medium 14.0 Tatum Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons 7 N/A
2686 5 2.96 2.96 Medium 14.0 Cecil Fescue Pasture 4.8 Ton: 8 N/A
2686 6 9.98 9.98 Medium 14.0 Tatum Fescue Pasture 4.5 Tons 7 N/A
2686 7 11.84 11.841 Medium 14.0 Tatum Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 7 N/A
2686 8 6.01 6.01 Medium 14.0 Tatum Fescue Pasture 4.5 Tons 7 N/A
2686 9 4.15 4.15 Low 1 14.0 Appling Fescue Pasture 5.2 Tons 8 N/A
PLAN TOTALS: 238.85 221.31
LI Potential Leaching Technical Guidance
2 Low potential to contribute to soluble None
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>-21 Moderate potential to contribute to Nutrient Management(590)should be planned.
<-10 soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
igh potential to contribute to soluble Nutrient Management(590)should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
nutrient leaching below the root zone. the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> 10 considered. Examples are Cover Crops(340)°to scavenge nutrients,Sod-Based Rotations
(328),Long-Terns No-Till(778),and edge-of-field practices such as Filter Strips(393)and
Riparian Forest Buffers(391).
PLAT Index Rating P Management Recommendation
0-25 Low No adjustment needed;N based application
25-50 Medium No adjustment needed;N based application
51 - 100 High Application limited to crop P removal
> 100 Very High Starter P application only
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed 6/25/2014
PCs Page 2 of 2
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown,their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
. This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products,commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (Ibs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
ilbs/A albs/Al (lbs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract I Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A I Tons 1000 gals tons
1090 1 1 S2 Lloyd 2.10 2.00 Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 213 0 0 Broad. 213 31.87 0.00 63.75 0.00
1090 J 2 S2 Lloyd 2.70 2.60 Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 213 0 0 Broad. 213 31.87 0.00 82.87 0.0
1090 3 S2 Lloyd 6.80 6.70 Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 213 0 0 Broad. 100 14,96 0.00 100.26 0.0
1090 4 S2 Lloyd 2.40 2.40 Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 213 0 0 Broad. 213 31.87 0.00 76,501 0.0
1090 5 S2 Lloyd 6.40 6.10 Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 213 0 0 Broad. 110 16.46 0.00 100.41 0.00
1112 1 S2 Lloyd 9.30 9.00 Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 213 0 0 Broad. 74 11.07 0.00 99.66 0.00
1112 10 S2 Lloyd 2.90 1.50 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 160 0 Broad. ol 0.00 .0.00 0.00 0.0
1112 2 S2 Lloyd 0.90 0.50 Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 8/1-7131 213 213 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1112 3 S2 Lloyd 5.60 5.60 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 0 0 Broad. 90 13.47 0.00 75.42 0.00
1112 4 S2 Lloyd 18.20 18.00 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 0 0 Broad. 28 4.19 c�.00 75.42 0.00
1112 5 S2 Lloyd 4.80 4,60 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 0 0 Broad. 109 16,31 0-00 75.03 0.00
1112 6 S2 Lloyd 8.10 6.00 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 160 0 Broad. 0 0.001 0.00 0.001 0.00
1112 7 S2 Lloyd 1.30 0.50 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 160 0 Broad. 0 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1112 8 S2 Lloyd 3.20 3.00 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 160 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1112 9 1 S2 Lloyd 1.90 1.70 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 160 0 Broad. 01 0.00 0.001 0.00 0.00
Fi121 1 S2 Cecil 2.13 1.70 Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 213 0 Fo Broad. 213 31,87 0.0 54.19 0.00
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 6/25/2014 WUT Page 1 of 6

Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (ibs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(lbs/A) bs/A (lbs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
1121 2 S2 Cecil 11.21 11.21 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 239 219 20 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1121 2 S2 Cecil 11.21 11.21 Oats,Grain 97 bu. 9/1-4/15 110 110 0 Broad. q 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1121 3 S2 Cecil 3.57 3,57 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 239 219 20 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00
1121 3 S2 Cecil 3.57 3.57 Oats,Grain 97 bu. 9/1-4/15 110 110 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
1121 4 S2 Cecil 23.08 23.08 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 239 219 20 Broad. 0 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.0
1121 4 S2 Cecil 23.08 23.08 Oats,Grain 97 bu. 9/1-4115 110 110 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1121 6 S2 Cecil 8.76 8.76 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 239 219 20 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1121 6 S2 Cecil 8.76 8.76 Oats,Grain 97 bu. 9/1-4/15 110 110 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1121 7 S2 Cecil 3.64 2.64 Corn,Silage 21.9 2/15-6/30 239 219 20 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1121 7 S2 Cecil 3.64 2,64 Oats,Grain 97 bu. 9/1-4/15 110 110 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2685 1 11 S2 Lloyd 2,77 2.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 163 163 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2685 1 12 S2 Lloyd 0.78 0.78 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 163 163 0 Broad.1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2685 13 S2 Cecil 2.05 0.33 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 163 163 0 Broad. 0 .0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2685 14 S2 Cecil 3.98 3.98 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 163 0 0 Broad. 163 24.39 0,00 97.08 0.00
2685 15 S2 Cecil 4.62 3.80 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 163 0 1 0 Broad. 163 24.39 0.00 92.69 0.00
2685 3 S2 Tatum 1.16 1.16 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 143 143 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2686 1 S2 Worsham 10.78 10.78 Fescue Hay 4.0 Tons 8/1-7/31 169 0 0 Broad. 12 1.80 0.00 19.36 0.00
2686 10 S2 Cecil 2.45 2.45 Fescue Pasture 4,6 Tons 8/1-7/31 153 0 0 Broad.1 153 22.90 0.00 56.09 0.0
2686 11 S2 Lloyd 0.68 0.68 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 163 163 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2686 16 S2 Appling 25.10 23.00 Fescue Pasture 5.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 183 109 0 Broad.1 74 11.07 0.001 254.69 0.00
2686 17 S2 Appling 8.96 6.30 Fescue Pasture 5.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 183 183 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00. 0.00
2686 18 1 S2 Appling 2.24 0.60 Fescue Pasture 5.5 Tons 1 8/1-7/31 183 0 0 Broad. 183 27.38 0.00 16.43 0.00
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed:6/25/2014 WUT Page 2 of 6

Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (Ibs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
slbs/A) sibs/A) (lbs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field 1D Soil Series Acres Acres I Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
2686 2 S2 Tatum 1.00 1.00 Fescue Hay 4.1 Tons 8/1-7/31 178 178 0 Broad, 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
2686 3 S2 Worsham 2.64 2.64 Fescue Hay 4.0 Tons 8/1-7/31 169 169 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2686 4 S2 Tatum 5.71 5.71 Fescue Pasture 4.3 Tons 8/1-7/31 140 0 0 Broad. 140 20.95 0.00 119.62 0.00
2686 5 S2 Cecil 2.96 2.96 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 0 0 Broad. 160 23.94 0.00 70.87 0.00
2686 6 S2 Tatum 9.98 9.98 Fescue Pasture 4.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 146 0 0 Broad. 114. 17.06 0.00 170.25 0.00
2686 7 S2 Tatum 11.84 11.84 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 143 0 0 Broad. 87 13,021 0.00 154.14 0.00
2686 8 S2 Tatum 6.01 6.01 Fescue Pasture 4.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 146 0 0 Broad. 146 21.85 0.00 131.30 0.00
2686 9 1 S2 Appling 4.15 4.15 Fescue Pasture 5.2 Tons 8/1-7/31 173 0 0 Broad. 173 25.89 0.00 107.44 0.00
Total Applied,1.000 gallons 2,093.4
Total Produced,1000 gallons 2,092.23
Balance,1000 gallons -1.23
Total Applied,tons 0.00
Total Produced,tons 0.00
Balance,tons 0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column,-symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 2. Symbol*means user entered data.
T
3 l
1
1 I
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed:6/25/2014 WUT Page 3 of 6

Waste Utilization Table Year 2
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(lbs/A) lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Appfic. 1000
Tract Field 1D Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
1090 1 S2 Lloyd 2.10. 2.00 Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 213 0 0 Broad. 213 31.87 0.00 63.75 0.00
1090 2 S2 Lloyd 2.70 2.60 Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 213 0 0 Broad. 213 31.87 0.00 82.87 0.00
1090 3 S2 Lloyd 6,801 6.70 Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 213 0 0 Broad. 100 14.96 0,00 100.26 0.00
1090 4 S2 Lloyd 2.40 2.40 1 Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 213 0 0 Broad. 213 31.87 0.00 76.50 0.00
1090 1 5 S2 Lloyd 6,40 6.10 Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 213 0 0 Broad. 110 16.46 0.00 100.41 0.0
1112 1 1 S2 Lloyd 9.30 9.00 Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 213 0 0 Broad. 74 11.07 0,00 99.66 0.0
1112 10 S2 Lloyd 2,90 1.50 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 160 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1112 2 S2 Lloyd 0.90 0.50 Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 213 213 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1112 3 S2 Lloyd 5,60 5.60 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 0 0 Broad. 90 13.47 0.00 75.42 0.00
1112 4 S2 Lloyd 18.20 18.00 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 0 0 Broad. 28 4.19 0.00 75.42 0.00
1112 5 S2 Lloyd 4.80 4.60 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 0 0 Broad. 109 16.31 0.00 75.03 0.00
1112 6 S2 Lloyd 8.10 6.00 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 160 0 Broad. 0 0.00 1 0.00 0,00 0.00
1112 7 S2 Lloyd 1.30 0.50 Fescue Pasture 4.87ons 8/1-7/31 1 160 160 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1112 8 S2 Lloyd 3.20 3.00 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 160 1 0 Broad.1 0 0.00 0.01.) 0.00 0.00
1112 9 S2 Lloyd 1.90 1.70 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 160 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0'0t)j 0.00
1121 1 S2 Cecil 2.13 1.70 Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 213 0 0 Broad. 213 31.87 t3.00 54.19 0.00
1121 2 S2 Cecil 11.21 11.21 Oats,Grain 97 bu. 9/1-4/15 110 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1121 3 S2 Cecil 3.57 3.57 Oats,Grain 97 bu. 9/1-4/15 110 0 0 Broad.. 0 0.001 0.00 0.00 0.00
1121 4 S2 Cecil 23.08 23.08 Oats,Grain 97 bu, 9/1-4/15 110 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1121 6 S2 Cecil 8.76 8.76 Oats,Grain 97 bu. 9/1-4/15 110 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1121 7 S2 Cecil 3.64 2.64 Oats,Grain 97 bu. 9/1-4/15 110 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2685 11 S2 Lloyd 2.77 2.00 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 163 163 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed:6/25/2014 WUT Page 4 of 6

Waste Utilization Table Year 2
Nitrogen Cornm Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. Obs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(lbs/A) Qbs/A) (lbs/A)
Source Total Use, Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE I Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
2685 12 S2 Lloyd 0.78 0.78 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 163 163 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2685 13 S2 Cecil 2.05 0.33 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 163 163 0 Broad, 01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2685 14 S2 Cecil 3.98 3.98 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 163 0 0 Broad. 163 24.39 0.00 97.08 0.00
2685 j 15 S2 Cecil 4.62 3.80 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 163 0 0 Broad. 163 24.39 0.00 92.69 0.00
2685 1 3 S2 Tatum 1.16 1.16 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 143 143 0 Broad, 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2686 1 1 S2 Worsham 10.78 10.78 Fescue Hay 4.0 Tons 8/1-7/31 169 0 0 Broad. 12 1.80 0.00 19.36 0.00
2686 10 S2 1 Cecil 2.45 2,45 Fescue Pasture 4.6 Tons 8/1-7/31 153 1 0 0 Broad. 153 22.90 0.00 56.09 0.00
2686 11 82 Lloyd 0.68 0.68 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 163 163 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2686 16 S2 Appling 25.10 23.00 Fescue Pasture 5.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 183 109 0 Broad, 74 11.07 0,00 254.69 0.00
2686 17 S2 Appling 8.96 6.30 Fescue Pasture 5.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 183 183 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2686 18 S2 Appling 2.24 0.60 Fescue Pasture 5.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 183 0 0 Broad. 183 27.38 0.00 16.43 0.0
2686 2 S2 Tatum 1.00 1.00 Fescue Hay 4.1 Tons 8/1-7131 178 178 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2686 3 S2 Worsham 2.64 2.64 Fescue Hay 4.0 Tons 8/1-7/31 169 169 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00
2686 4 S2 Tatum 5.71 5.71 Fescue Pasture 43 Tons 8/1-7/31 140 0 0 Broad. 140 20.95 0.00 119.62 0.00
2686 5 S2 Cecil 2.96 2.96 Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 8/1-7/31 160 0 0 Broad. 160 23.94 0.00 70.87 0,00
2686 1 6 S2 Tatum 9.98 9.98 Fescue Pasture 4.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 146 0 0 Broad. 114 17.06 0,00 170.25 0.00
2686 7 S2 Tatum 11.84 11.84 Fescue Pasture 4.4 Tons 8/1-7/31 143 0 0 Broad. 87 13.02 0.00 154.14 0.00
2686 8 S2 Tatum 6.01 6.01 1 Fescue Pasture 4.5 Tons 8/1-7/31 146 0 0 Broad. 146 21.851 0.00 131.30 0.00
2686 9 S2 Appling 4.1$ 4,15 Fescue Pasture 5.2Tons 8/1-7/31 173 0 0 Broad. 173 25.89 0.00 107.44 0.00
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 6/25/2014 WUT Page 5 of 6

Waste Utilization Table Year 2
Nitrogen Comm. 1 Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(11 A) Ls/A; (lbs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field I ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
Total Applied,1000 gallons 2,093.46
Total Produced,1000 gallons 2.092.23
Balance,1000 gallons -1.23
Total Applied,tons 0.00
Total Produced,tons 0.00
Balance,tons 0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column,—symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 2. Symbol*means user entered data.
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 6/25/2014 WUT Page 6 of 6

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate
excessive levels of copper or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis forthese elements. High levels of zinc and copper
can adversely affect plant growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can
be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071.,respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85.
By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc, we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices,this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample.
Application of lime at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production .
ValUes
Lime Recom.
Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-I Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation
1090 1 Fescue Hm 6.4 0.0 112 None 183 None
1090 2 Fescue Ha• 6.4 0.0 112 None 183 None
1090 3 Fescue Ha 6.4 0.6 112 None 183 None
1090 4 Fescue Hay 6.4 0.0 112 None 183 None
1090 5 Fescue Hay 6.4 0.0 112 None 183 None
1112 1 Fescue Hay 6.5 0.0 65 None 53 None
1112 10 Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 132 None 123 None
1112 2 Fescue Hai 6.5 0.0 65 None 53 None
1112 3 Fescue Pasture 6.2 1 0.0 82 None 134 None
1112 4 Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 132 None 123 None
1112 5 Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 132 None 123 None
1112 6 Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 132 None 123 None
1112 7 Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 132 None 123 None
1112 8 Fescue Pasture 6.2 0.0 82 None 134 None
1112 9 Fescue Pasture 6.2 0.0 82 None 134 None
1121 1 Fescue Hay 6.7 0.0 0 None 0 None
1121 2 Com,Silage 6.7 0.0 0 None 0 None
1121 2 Oats,Grain 6.7 0.0 0 None 0 None
1121 1 3 Corn,Silage 6.4 0.0 0 None 0 None
1121 3 Oats,Grain 6.4 0.0 0 None 0 None
1121 4 Corn,Sil a 6.4 0.0 0 None 0 None
1121 4 Oats,Grain 6.4 0.011 0 None 0 1 None
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 06-25-2014 STV Page 1 of 2

Recluired Soil Test ValLies
Lime Recom.
Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-1 Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation
1121 6 Com Silage 6.7 0.0 0 None 0 None
1121 6 Oats,Grain 6.7 0.0 0 None 0 None
1121 7 Corn Silage 6.7 0.0 0 None 0 None
1121 7 Oats,Grain 6.7 0.0 0 None 0 None
2685 11 Fescue Pasture 6.5 0.0 162 None 303 None
2685 12 Fescue Pasture 6.5 0.0 162 None 303 None
2685 13 Fescue Pasture 6.5 0.0 162 None 303 None
2685 14 Fescue Pasture 6.5 0.0 162 None 303 None
2685 15 Fescue Pasture 6.5 0.0 162 None 303 None
2685 3 Fescue Pasture 6.5 0.0 162 None 303 None
2686 1 Fescue Hati 6.3 0.0 91 None 233 None
2686 10 Fescue Pasture 6.6 0.0 98 None 198 None
2686 11 Fescue Pasture 6.6 1 0.0 98 None 198 None
2686 16 Fescue Pasture 6.6 0.0 98 None 198 None
2686 17 Fescue Pasture 6.6 0.0 98 None 198 None
2686 18 Fescue Pasture 6.3 0.0 91 None 233 None
2686 2 Fescue Hay 6.3 0.0 91 None 233 None
2686 3 Fescue Ha 6.3 0.0 91 None 233 None
2686 4 Fescue Pasture 6.3 0.0 91 None 233 None
2686 5 Fescue Pasture 6.3 0.0 91 None 233 None
2686 6 Fescue Pasture 6.3 0.0 91 None 233 None
2686 7 Fescue Pasture 6.3 0.0 91 None 233 None
2686 8 Fescue Pasture 6.3 0.0 91 None 233 1 None
2686 9 Fescue Pasture 6.6 0.0 98 None 198 1 None
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 06-25-2014 STV Page 2 of 2

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity,this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative,the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name I Dairy(Milk Cow)Liquid Manure Slurry Design Storage Ca aci (Daysl
Start Date 12/1 90
Plan.Year Month Available Storage Capacity(Days)
1 1 59
1 2 90
1 3 90
1 4 90
1 5 61
1 6 31
1 7 0
1 8 23
1 9 54
1 10 27
1 11 62
1 12 31
2 1 0
2 2 51
2 3 71
2 4 90
2 5 61
2 6 31
2 7 0
2 8 23
2 9 54
2 10 27
2 11 62
2 12 31
*Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 06-25-2014 Capacity Page 1 of i

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner,who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 -Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding,waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed:6/25/2014 Specification Page 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
.planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October-1, 1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed:6/25/2014 Specification Paize 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over-spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from-the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated,the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre-plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- --------------------- -
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed:6/25/2014 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate-determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5)years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
--------------------------------
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed:6/25/2014 Specification Pare 4

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient
management plan developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops
for each year of the plan. Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements and soil test results. The quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity
of other nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other
byproducts are utilized to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the
application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of
this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations,additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources
may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 1090 1 Req'd Nutrients 213 0 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 2.00 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Lloyd Residual 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.8 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 75 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE -213 0 -101 01 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 1090 2 Req'd Nutrients 213 0 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 2.60 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Lloyd Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.8 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 213 291 491 152 6 7 1 0
P Removal I Rating 75 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 01 291 491 152 6 7 1 0
Tract Field 1090 3 Req'd Nutrients 213 0 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 6.70 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Lloyd Residual 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.8 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 100 136 231 71 3 3 1 0
PRemoval I Rating 751bs/ac. Medium BALANCE -113 136 221 71 3 3 1 0
Tract Field 1090 4 Req'd Nutrients 213 0 10 0 0 dl 0 0
Acres App.Period 2.40 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Lloyd Residual 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.8 Tons 1 04-02-13 Manure 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 751bs/ac. tiledium BALANCE -213 0 -10 0 0 0 01 0
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 6/25/2014 NMR Page 1 of 10

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons(A)
Tract Field 1090 5 Req'd Nutrients 21.3 0 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 6.10 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Lloyd Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.8 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 110 150 254 78 3 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 75 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE -103 150 244 78 3 3 1 0
Tract Field 1112 1 Req'd Nutrients 213 0 60 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App Period 9.00 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
[ ommercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Lloyd Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.8 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 74 101 171 53 2 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 75 lbs/ac. h4edium BALANCE -139 101 111 53 2 2 1 0
Tract Field 1112 10 Req'd Nutrients 160 90 10 0 0 01 0 0
Acres App.Period 1.50 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 160 90 10 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Lloyd Residual 01 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.8 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 8 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 1112 2 Req'd Nutrients 213 0 60 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 0.50 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 213 0 60 0 0 0 0 0
Soil-Series Lloyd Residual 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.8 Tons 04-02-13. Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal I Rating 75 lbs/ac. 'Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0
Tract Field 1112 3 Req'd Nutrients 160 60 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres jApp.Period 5.60 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Lloyd Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.8 Tons 1 04-02-13 Manure 90 123 208 64 2 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 8 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE -70 63 198 64 2 3 1 0
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 6/25/2014 NMR Page 2 of 10

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract I Field 1 1112 4 Req'd Nutrients 160 90 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 18.00 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Lloyd Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.8 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 28 38 65 20 1 1 01 0
P Removal Rating 8 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE -132 -52 551 20 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 1112 5 Req'd Nutrients 160 90 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 4.60 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Lloyd Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.8 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 109 149 251 78 3 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 8 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE -51 59 241 78 3 31 1 0
Tract I Field 1112 6 Req'd Nutrients 160 90 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 6.00 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 160 90 10 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Lloyd Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.8 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0
P Removal Rating 8 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
Tract I Field 1112 7 Req'd Nutrients 160 90 10 0 0 0 01 0
Acres I App.Period 0.50 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 160 90 10 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Lloyd Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.8 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 8 Ibs/ac. 'Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 1112 8 Req'd Nutrients 160 60 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.00 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CommercialFert. 160 60 10 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series i'oyd Residual 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.8 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 0 0 0 01 01 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 8 lbs/ac. 1.ledium BALANCE 01 0 0 0 01 0 0 0
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 6/25/2014 NMR Page 3 of 10
APR 102019
w8wouslity
iM4i OPw tlonsseC

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YFAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract I Field 1112 9 Req'd Nutrients 160 60 10 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 1.70 1 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 160 60 10 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Lloyd Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.8 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PRemoval Rating 8lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract . Field 1121 1 Req'd Nutrients 213 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 1.70 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter, 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
WE Sample Date 4 8 Tons 02-04-14 Manure 213 291 491 I52 6 7 1 0
P Removal Rating 75 lbs/ac. I_ow BALANCE 0 291 491 152 6 7 1 0
Tract Field 1121 2 Req'd Nutrients 110 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 11.21 9/1-4/15 Supplied By:
CROP Oats,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
RYE I Sample Date 97 bu. 02-04-14 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 24 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 1121 2 Req'd Nutrients 239 0 0 0 0 6 2 0
Acres App.Period 11.21 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 219 0 0 0 0 6 2 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 21.9 Tons 02-04-14 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 74 lbs/ac. 'Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
Tract Field 1121 3 Req'd Nutrients 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.57 9/1-4/15 Supplied By:
CROP Oats,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 97 bu. 06-23-14 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal I Rating 24 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 01 0 01 01 0 0 0 0
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 6/25/2014 NMR Page 4 of 10

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract I Field 1121 3 Req'd Nutrients 239 0 0 0 0 6 2 0
Acres App.Period 3.57 1 2/15-6130 Supplied By:
CROP Com,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 219 0 0 0 0 6 2 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 20. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 21.9 Tons 06-23-14 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 74 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0
Tract I Field 1121 4 Req'd Nutrients 239 0 0 0 0 6 2 0
Acres I App.Period 23.08 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
Commercial Fert. 219 0 0 0 0 6 2 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 21.9 Tons 02-04-14 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 74 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 1121 4 Req'd Nutrients 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 23.08 9/1-4/15 Supplied By:
CROP Oats,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 110 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 97 bu. 02-04-14 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 24 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 1121 6 Req'd Nutrients 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 8.76 9/1-4/15 Supplied By:'
CROP Oats,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CommercialFert. 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series t,ecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 97 bu. 02-04-14 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
P Removal I Rating 241bs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 1121 6 Req'd Nutrients 239 0 0 0 0 6 2 0
Acres 'App.Period 9.76 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 219 0 0 0 0 6 2 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 20 01 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 21.9 Tons 02-04-14 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 74 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 01 0 01 0 0 0 0
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 6/25/2014 NMR Page 5 of 10

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 1121 7 Req'd Nutrients 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 2.64 9/1-4/15 Supplied By: ,
CROP Oats,Grain Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 97 bu. 02-04-14 Manure 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 24lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 1121 7 Req'd Nutrients 239 0 0 0 0 6 2 0
Acres App.Period 2.64 2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 219 0 0 0 0 6 2 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 21.9 Tons 02-04-14 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 74 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2685. 11 Req'd Nutrients 163 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 2.00 8/1-7131 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 163 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Lloyd Residual 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.9 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 81bs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2685 12 Req'd Nutrients 163 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 0.78 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 163 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Lloyd Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.9 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PRemoval Rating 8lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2685 13 Req'd Nutrients 163 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres ,App.Period 0.33 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 163 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.9 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 8 lbs/ac. \,tedium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 6/25/2014 NMR Page 6 of 10

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 2685 14 Req'd Nutrients 163 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 3.98 8/1-7131 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture . Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.9 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 163 222 376 116 4 5 1 0
P Removal Rating 8 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 222 3761 116 4 51 1 0
Tract Field 2685 15 Req'd Nutrients 163 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.80 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.9 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 163 222 376 116 4 5 1 0
P Removal Rating 8 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 222 376 116 4 5 1 0
Tract Field 2685 3 Req'd Nutrients 143 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 1.16 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 143 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.4 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 7 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2686 1 Req'd Nutrients 169 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 10.78 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Worsham Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.0 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 12 16 28 9 0 0 0 0
P Removal I Rating 63 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE -157 16 28 9 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2686 10 Req'd Nutrients 153 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 2.45 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(.'ommercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series ['ecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 4.6 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 153 209 353 109 4 5 1 0
P Removal I Rating 1 7 lbs/ac. I.Medium I BALANCE 01 209 353 109 4 51 1 0
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 6/25/2014 NMR Page 7 of 10

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
Qbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Qbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons(A)
Tract I Field 2686 11 Req'd Nutrients 163 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 0.68 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 163 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Lloyd Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.9 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 8 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2686 16 Req'd Nutrients 183 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 23.00 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter ol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 5.5 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 74 101 17I 53 2 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 9 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 101 171 53 2 2 1 0
Tract Field 2686 17 Req'd Nutrients 183 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 6.30 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 183 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series APPling Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date 5.5 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 9 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2686 18 Req'd Nutrients 183 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 0.60 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series APpling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 5.5 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 183 250 422 130 5 6 1 0
P Removal Rating 9 lbstac. Low BALANCE 0 250 422 130 5 6 1 0
Tract Field 2686 2 Req'd Nutrients 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 1.00 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.1 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 64 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 6/25/2014 NMR Page 8 of 10

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) Obs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 2686 3 Req'd Nutrients 169 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres jApp.Period 2.64 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Hay Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 169 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Worsham Residual 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.0 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 63 lbs/ac. .Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract I Field 2686 4 Req'd Nutrients 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 5.71 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.3 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 140 191 323 100 4 4 1 0
P Removal Rating 7 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 191 323 100 4 4 1 0
Tract Field 2686 5 Req'd Nutrients 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 2.96 9/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.8 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 160 218 369 114 4 5 1 0
P Removal Rating 8 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 218 369 114 4 5 1 0
Tract I Field 2686 6 Req'd Nutrients 1461 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 9.98 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 01 0 01 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.5 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 114 156 263 81 3 4 1 0
PRemoval Rating 7lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 732 156 263 81 3 4 1 0
Tract Field 2686 7 Req'd Nutrients 143 0 0 0 0 01 0 0
Acres App.Period 11.84 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.4 Tons 104-02-13 Manure 87 119 201 62 2 31 1 0
P Removal IRating 7 lbs/ac. I.Medium BALANCE -56 119 201 62 2 31 1 0
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 6/25/2014 NMR Page 9 of 10

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 2686 8 Req'd Nutrients 146 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 6.01 8/1-7131 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Tatum Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
RYE I Sample Date 4.5 Tons 04-02-13 Manure 146 199 337 104 4 5 1 1 0
P Removal Rating 7 lbs/ac_ Medium BALANCE 0 199 337 104 4 5 1 0
Tract Field 2686 9 Req'd Nutrients 173 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 4.15 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
Soil Series Appling Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date 5.2 Tons 1 04-02-13 1 Manure 173 236 399 123 5 5 1 0
P Removal Rating 1 8 Ibs/ac. .ow BALANCE 01 2361 399 123 5 5 1 0
NOTE: Symbol.*means user entered data.
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 6/25/2014 NMR Page 10 of 10

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT and
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAIN
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590-633
Prepared for: i'n
By: j 2
Farm: Tract: 1096, j i i-z-- Date:_/_J��
2-5
14
l07
To utilize agricultural wastes for
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT? livestock feed or as an energy source.
The conservation practice, Nutrient CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT
Management, is managing the amount, MANAGEMENT!WASTE UTILIZATION
source, placement, form and timing of the PLAN
application of nutrients and soil amendments
to achieve realistic production goals, while The information provided in this Job
minimizing nutrient movement to.surface or Sheet and the attachments meet the
ground waters. The practice, Waste minimum requirements for a Nutrient
Utilization, is using agricultural waste such as Management Plan for USDA-NRCS
manure or wastewater in an environmentally
sound manner. These practices are jointly purposes. This Nutrient Management
accomplished through the development of a Plan includes:
Nutrient ManagementlWaste Utilization Plan, 1 A plan map and soils map for the area
which is normally part of a broader planned (these may be part of the
Conservation Plan that addresses multiple overall Conservation Plan).
natural resource concerns on the land.
2. Location of designated sensitive areas
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT or resources (streams, wells,
and WASTE UTILIZATION PRACTICES sinkholes, etc.)and any associated
nutrient application setbacks, etc.
Your nutrient management/waste utilization 3. Your planned crop rotation.
plan is intended to.accomplish one or more of
the following objectives: 4. Results of soil, plant, water tests.
• To budget nutrients for plant production. 5. Results from Phosphorus Loss
• To properly utilize manure or organic by- Assessment Tool (PLAT) or Leaching
products as a plant nutrient source. Index(LI) as required.
• To minimize the delivery of agricultural -6. Realistic yield expectations for the
nutrients to surface and ground water crops in the rotation, and their source
resources. if other than default values approved
• To maintain or improve the physical, for N.C.
chemical, and biological condition of the -7. Recommended nutrient application
soil. rates for nitrogen, phosphorus, and
potassium, as well as timing, form,
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 1

and method of application and REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT
incorporation, if applicable. MANAGEMENT")
8. This Job Sheet (or comparable You are required to acquire and comply
information), that provides the following: with all federal, state, or focal permit
• General requirements of this practice, requirements related to the handling and
as well as additional requirements to application of.manure or organic
meet the natural resource protection materials.
purposes listed above.
• Additional considerations specific to The nutrient management/waste
this plan. utilization plan must address all organic
waste generated at or brought to the
• Operation and maintenance facility. A Waste Utilization Third Party
information associated with this Agreement must exist to address all
practice. organic waste not handled by the nutrient
Because this Nutrient Management Plan management/waste utilization plan.
includes agricultural organic sources, Manure or organic wastes will not be
additional items are required in the plan to applied to the following areas:
ensure proper waste utilization: . surface waters,
• Waste Utilization Agreement(if . wetlands, unless constructed as a
applicable) component in a waste treatment
• Waste Utilization Third Party system,
Agreement (if applicable) . soils subject to frequent flooding
• Additional engineering design and during the period when flooding is
operating information for waste storage expected,
structures, transport, and application frozen, snow-covered, or saturated
system, as applicable. These designs, soils,
and the instructions for operating these • within 200 feet of a dwelling other
structures, is an integral component of
your overall Nutrient Management/ than those owned by the producer,
Waste Utilization Plan. • within 100 feet of a well,
• Emergency Action Plan to prevent • within 25 feet of surface waters, or
overtopping or other discharges from within any other setbacks as identified
storage structures or facilities, as by federal, state, or local laws or
applicable. regulations (e.g. NC General Statute
prevents swine lagoon effluent from
This plan was developed based on the current being applied within 75 feet of a
NRCS 590 and 633 standards and Federal, residential property boundary or
state, or local regulations or policies. perennial stream or river if the facility
Changes in laws or regulations may was sited on or after October 1995.)
necessitate a revision of the plan.
Manure or organic wastes will be applied
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE in a manner not to reach surface waters,
UTILIZATION wetlands (unless constructed as a
component in a waste treatment system),
General property owned by others, or public right-
of-way.
All manure and organic residues must be
applied according to a nutrient management Sludge that accumulates in waste storage
plan (see the following section, 'BASIC structures must be analyzed prior to land
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 2

application. Adequate provisions (available The realistic yield expectations (RYEs) in
land and/or third party manure agreements) this plan are based on one or more of the
must exist to ensure sludge is applied in following:
adherence to all nutrient application Default values approved by the N.C.
requirements, All federal and state guidance Interagency Nutrient Management
regarding the proper testing, handling, Committee that incorporate soil
planning, and application of sludge must be productivity information, yield data,
followed for regulated operations. and research with North Carolina
soils, and cropping systems.
Since compliance with all applicable North Additional information on the default
Carolina laws is the responsibility of the values may be found at:
producer, you should consult the most current
version of the Guidance Memo for www.soil.ncsu.edu/nmp/ncnmw4/index.him
Implementing the Environmental Management
Commission's Regulations for Animal Waste -• Documented actual yield data from
Management for questions. the site, determined by the average of
the highest three yields of the last five
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR consecutive specific crop harvests.
PROVIDING LIVESTOCK FEED (For forage crops, determine the
average of the highest three years of
If applicable, all agricultural wastes or other the last five years.)
organic residues used for feedstock must be A fertilization rate recommended by
handled in a manner to minimize North Carolina State University may
contamination and preserve its feed value. be used in cases where no yield data
Chicken litter stored for this purpose must be or approved RYE values exist for a
covered. A qualified animal nutritionist shall crop.
develop rations that utilize animal wastes. An RYE inferred from a similar crop
on a soil with similar physical and
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR chemical features may be used for
PROVIDING A SOURCE OF ENERGY new crops or in the absence of other
RYE data. This inferred RYE may
If your facility is to be used for energy ONLY be specified by a certified
production, all energy producing components Nutrient Management planner.
of the system are included.in the Nutrient
Management/Waste Utilization Plan and Erosion, runoff, and water management
provisions for the utilization of residues of controls have been planned, as needed,
energy production identified. Your Nutrient on fields that receive nutrients.
Management Plan includes the use of these
residues, if applicable. Soil Testing
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT This nutrient management plan has been
MANAGEMENT developed based on current soil test
results (no older than three years).
General
Soil samples must be collected and
Application of nutrients must comply with all prepared in accordance with North
applicable Federal, state, and local laws and Carolina State University or the North
regulations. Carolina Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services (NCDA&CS)
Agronomic Division standards or
recommendations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 3

Soil test analyses can be performed by any NCDA&CS Agronomic Division, or others
laboratory or program that is certified by the certified by the NCDENR.
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of Field Risk Assessment
Water Quality, Laboratory Section.
A field-specific assessment of the
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division uses the potential for phosphorus transport from
Mehlich-3 extractant process for soil testing. each field (or groups of similar fields)
Growers who utilize other laboratories must have been conducted, using the North
request the use of the Mehlich-3 methodology Carolina Phosphorus Loss Assessment
to ensure the test results are compatible with Tool (PLAT)
North Carolina's nutrient management
planning and assessment tools. For statewide PLAT assesses the potential for
consistency, all laboratories used must phosphorus (P) to be transported from the
provide fertilization recommendations using site to surface water through each of the
guidelines and methodologies as referenced four primary loss pathways:
at the NCDA&CS website: • sediment-bound P transported
through erosion,
www.ncagr.com/a4ronomi/obook.htm . soluble P transported through
surface runoff,
Growers are encouraged to use a laboratory soluble P leached through the soil
that is supported by field research within the g
state. profile, and
• non-incorporated source P
Soil testing shall include analysis for all transported through surface
nutrients for which specific information is runoff.
needed to develop the nutrient plan.
Based on the assessment of each loss
Plant Tissue Testing pathway, PLAT produces a single rating
for each field. As shown below, this
Tissue sampling and testing, when used, shall rating will identify whether nitrogen or
be done in accordance with North Carolina phosphorus shall be the rate-determining
State University or NCDA&CS standards or element in developing the planned
recommendations. application rate for manure.
Manure Testing PLAT Rating I Nutrient Application Criteria
LOW Nitrogen-based manure
Nutrient values of manure and organic by- application.
products shall be established for planning MEDIUM Nitrogen-based manure
purposes based on laboratory analysis, application. _
acceptable default values, or historic records HIGH Manure application limited to
for the operation. phosphorus removal from site
in harvested plant biomass.
When determining actual application rates, a VERY HIGH No additional manure
laboratoryanalysis is required. State application to be specified in
Y q
regulations-require that waste be tested within plan for the site.
60 days of utilization for some operations. In On all sites, regardless of the PLAT
the case of daily spreading, the waste must be rating, starter fertilizers may be
sampled and analyzed at least once a year. recommended in accordance with NCSU
Acceptable laboratories include the guidelines or recommendations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 4

In some cases, specific conservation practices nutrients that exceeds the soil test
that reduce the potential for phosphorus recommendation.
transport have been incorporated into PLAT.
Examples include buffers or filter strips, When the plan is being implemented
ponds, water table management, and residue on a phosphorus standard (a PLAT
management and conservation tillage. rating of High or Very High), manure
Similarly, soil erosion rates, either existing or or other organic by-products shall be
planned, have been incorporated into your applied at rates consistent with the
PLAT analysis. This information is shown on phosphorus application guidance
the PLAT results enclosed. Because the below. In such situations, an
management of the site actually affects the additional nitrogen application from
PLAT rating, all practices identified on the non-organic.sources may be required
PLAT analysis (including any required to to supply nitrogen at the rate
achieve the specified erosion rate) must be recommended by the RYE.
either already installed or included in a
Conservation Plan for the Nutrient Within the limits allowed by PLAT,
Management Plan to be approved. manure or other organic by-products
may be applied on soybeans at rates
Nutrient Application Rates equal to the estimated removal of
nitrogen in harvested plant biomass.
Recommended nutrient application rates are
based on North Carolina State University or All nitrogen rates for hay production
NCDA&CS recommendations that consider are for pure grass stands. Due to the
current soil test results, RYES, and nutrient recycling by grazing animals,
management. the planned nitrogen rate per unit
yield for hay crops shall be reduced
Liming material shall be applied as needed to by 25% for the portion of the expected
adjust soil pH to the specific range required by yield that is removed through grazing.
the crop or crops in the rotation for optimum
availability and utilization of nutrients. Phosphorus Application—When
manure or other organic by-products
The application amount and rate (inlhr)for are used, the planned rates of
liquid wastes (e.g. applied through irrigation) phosphorus application shall be based
shall not result in runoff from the site. The on the PLAT rating for the site, as
application shall not exceed the field capacity follows:
of the soil.
Low or Medium Rating —The
The planned rates of nutrient application are planned manure or organic by-
shown on the attached sheets. These rates product application rate is based
have been computed as follows: . on the nitrogen needs of the crop.
• Nitrogen Application - When the plan is High Rating—The planned
nitrogen-based (a PLAT rating of Low or manure or organic by-product
Medium), the application rate of manure or application rate is limited to the
organic by-products shall be based on the phosphorus removal rate of the
recommended nitrogen rate using the RYE harvested plant biomass.
for the site (or a rate recommended by
NCSU or NCDA in the case of crops Very High Rating — No additional
without established RYEs). This may manure or organic by-product
result in an application rate for other application is specified in the plan.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 5

On all sites, regardless of the PLAT rating, plant nutrient uptake characteristics, while
starter fertilizers containing nitrogen, considering cropping system limitations,
phosphorus, and potassium may be weather and climatic conditions, and held
recommended in accordance with North accessibility. Nutrients shall not be
Carolina State University guidelines or applied to frozen, snow-covered, or
recommendations. saturated soil.
A single application of phosphorus applied Manure or organic by-products shall not
as manure or organic by-product may be be applied more than 30 days prior to
made at a rate equal to the recommended planting of the crop or forages breaking
phosphorus application or estimated dormancy.
phosphorus removal in harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple For nutrients applied through irrigation
years in the crop sequence. systems, application equipment should be
properly calibrated to ensure uniform
• When such single applications are distribution of material at planned rates.
made, the rate shall:
♦ not exceed the recommended Plan Review and Revision Period
nitrogen application rate during the
year of application, or A thorough review and revision (if
needed) of the nutrient management plan
♦ not exceed the estimated nitrogen shall be conducted on a regular cycle, not
removal in harvested plant bio- to exceed five years.
mass during the year of application
when there is no recommended Heavy Metals Monitoring
nitrogen application, or
♦ not be made on sites with a Very For animal waste, including sludge, zinc
High PLAT risk rating. and copper concentrations shall be
• Potassium Application— Planned monitored and alternative crop sites for
potassium application rates should application shall be sought when these
match the soil test recommended rates metals approach excessive
as closely as possible. (This is concentrations. The following criteria and
particularly critical in situations where a actions are provided:
potentially,harmful nutrient imbalance
in crops or forages may occur, such as
grass tetany). When using manure or ziNc
other organic sources, the addition of Mehlich-3 Index Action
potassium from non-organic sources fZn-Il
be required. 300(21 Ibs/ac) Peanuts are very sensitive to
may q zinc,and application on peanuts
• Other Plant Nutrients -The planned should be limited.Seek
rates of application of other nutrients if alternative sites when possible.
applicable are consistent with North The risk of zinc toxicity is
Carolina State Universityor the greater with low soil pH and has
been seen at Zn-1 as low as
NCDA&CS guidelines or 300.'
recommendations. 500(35 Ibs/ac) Critical toxic level for peanuts.
Cease application on peanuts.'
Nutrient Application Timing 2,000(142 Caution:Seek altemative sites
Ibs/ac) when possible for all crops.
3,000(213 Critical toxic level for all crops.
Timing of nutrient application shall ` Ibs/ac) _ Cease application for all crops.
correspond as closely as possible with
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 6

likely source. The Leaching Index (LI)
COPPER is included in this plan.
Mehlich-3 Index Action
cu-I While the results of the LI does not affect
2,000(72 Ibs/ac) Caution:Seek alternative sites
when possible for all crops.* your planned nutrient application rates,
3,000(108 Critical to)ac level for all crops. some additional conservation practices
Ibs/ac) Cease application on all crops.* may be specified in the plan to reduce the
*Maintain pH at 6.0 on these risk of nutrient movement from the field, if
sites. applicable.
When sewage sludge is applied, the IMPORTANCE OF MANAGING
accumulation of potential pollutants (including NUTRIENTS
arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, selenium,
and zinc) in the soil shall be monitored in Nitrogen and phosphorus are water
accordance with the US Code, Reference 40 soluble elements and either or both may
CFR, Parts 403 and 503, and applicable state be components of organic and inorganic
and local laws or regulations. Additional fertilizers. In soluble forms, both can
information on heavy metal criteria for sewage move with water as leachate down
sludge may be found in Land Application of through the soil, or over the soil surface
Sewage Sludge, EPA/831-B-93-002b as runoff after rainfall. While nitrogen and
publication number at: phosphorus exist in different forms and
htto.-Ilwww.e�)a. ov/niodes/oubs/sludge.ilf may move through different transport
-- processes on the same site, they both
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR can have detrimental effects on both
MINIMIZING DELIVERY OF NUTRIENTS TO surface and shallow ground water quality.
SURFACE AND GROUND WATER As an example, excess nutrients can
result in accelerated eutrophication with
In areas that have been identified as impaired severe algal blooms and fish kills.
with agricultural nutrients being a likely
source, an assessment shall be completed of Because of the topography, hydrology,
the potential for nitrogen or phosphorus and other factors in the state, the
transport from the site. (The streams/water environmental problems from excess
bodies in this category are.listed in the USDA- nutrients reaching surface water may not
NRCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section be exhibited near the contributing source,
but rather create water quality problems
far downstream. Consequently, the
Neuse River Basin, Tar-Pamlico Basin,
❑ NO the Chowan River, the watershed of the
This nutrient management plan IS NOT in B. Everett Jordan Reservoir, and the
an area where surface waters are watershed of the New River in Onslow,
impaired, with agricultural nutrients County are listed as Nutrient Sensitive
identified as a likely source. The Leaching waters in North Carolina.
Index(LI) is not required.
Nitrogen:. Nitrogen applied as fertilizer or
organic material is transformed into
❑ YES nitrate and can move with the water
moving downward into the shallow ground
This nutrient management plan IS in an water and eventually to surface waters.
area where surface waters are impaired, (Relatively small amounts of nitrogen
with agricultural nutrients identified as a reach our surface waters through rainfall
runoff. )The Leaching Index(LI) is a
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 7

required part of the nutrient management plan are needed. (The S.B. 1217
in some areas of the state with surface water interagency group guidelines
impairments. The LI uses soils information accepted by the N.C. Division of
and local climate data to assess the potential Water Quality for .0200 operations
hazard from leaching of nutrients. The results specify a plan revision when there are
of the LI analysis and recommended actions changes in crops or cropping patterns
are included in your nutrient management that utilize more than 25 percent of
plan, if applicable. the nitrogen generated by the
operation.) As a minimum, nutrient
Phosphorus: Research in recent decades management plans shall be
indicates that, with high soil phosphorus thoroughly reviewed every five years
levels, phosphorus has more potential to be and revised if necessary. The next
transported off-site than recognized in the review will be performed in
past. Phosphorus can be transported in
several ways: (1) attached to soil particles
leaving the field through erosion, (2) in soluble 2. Protect fertilizer and organic by-
form leaving the field in surface runoff, and (3) product storage facilities from weather
in soluble form leaching downward through and accidental leakage or spillage.
the soil profile, and eventually into surface
water. Unlike nitrogen, the most likely 3. Ensure proper calibration of
transport pathway for phosphorus varies by application equipment to ensure
site, and depends upon such factors as soil uniform distribution of material at
erosion rate, soil phosphorus levels, texture of planned rates.
soils, existence of buffers, and other factors.
In N.C., PLAT is the tool used to assess 4. Inspect and maintain the equipment
potential excessive phosphorus losses. The and facilities used to implement the
results of the PLAT analysis and Nutrient Management/Waste
recommended actions are included in your Utilization Plan regularly. Any needed
nutrient management plan, if applicable. repairs should be made in a timely
manner.
If a site receives a PLAT rating of Low or
Medium, then applying manure at rates based 5. Review the Emergency Action Plan, if
on the nitrogen needs of the crop is allowed. applicable, annually.
It is important to realize that this.may result in _
phosphorus being applied at rates that 6. Records should be maintained for five
significantly exceed the crop's phosphorus years, or for a period as required by
removal rate. In these cases, the planned other Federal, state, or local
nutrient application rate is not sustainable, ordinances, or program or contract
and eventually a PLAT rating of High may be requirements. To ensure adequate
reached. information exists to support sound
nutrient management, NRCS
recommends the following records be
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE included:
You are responsible for safe operation and • Soil test results and
maintenance of this practice, including all recommendations for nutrient
equipment. The following Operation & application,
Maintenance should be conducted: • Quantities, analyses and sources
of nutrients applied (When the
1 Review the plan annually to determine if actual rates used exceed the
adjustments or modifications to the plan recommended and planned rates
on inorganic fertilizer plans,
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 8

records should indicate the reasons for
the differences, e.g. inability to acquire
custom blended fertilizer.)
Dates and method of nutrient
applications,
• Crops planted, planting and harvest
dates, yields, and crop residues
removed,
• Results of water, plant, and organic by-
product analyses, and
• Dates of review and person performing
the review, and recommendations that
resulted from the review.
NOTE: State laws or regulations may
define record-keeping requirements for
some operations.
7. Ensure that workers are protected from
and avoid unnecessary contact with
inorganic fertilizers and organic by-
products. Protection should include the
use of protective clothing when working
with plant nutrients.Extra caution must be
taken when handling ammonia sources of
nutrients, or when dealing with organic
wastes stored in poorly ventilated
enclosures.
8. Properly dispose of material generated by
the cleaning of nutrient application
equipment. Excess material should be
collected and stored or field applied in an
appropriate manner. Excess material
should not be applied on areas of high
potential risk for runoff or leaching.
9. Properly dispose of or recycle nutrient
containers according to state and local
guidelines or regulations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 9

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 10, 11, 12,3,4, 5, 6,7, 8,9
Fescue:Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10(best)and Feb. 15 to Mar.20.For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac.,for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed.Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass.Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25"in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus,and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only.Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques.Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac.N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production;reduce N rates by 25%for grazing.Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30,with equal amounts in each window.Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 5, 9
Fescue:Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10(best)and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20.For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac.,for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed.Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass.Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus,and potassium
recommendations.Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only.Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques.Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac.N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production;reduce N rates by 25%for grazing.Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.20 and
Aug.20 to Sept. 30,with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 06-25-2014 Crop Note Page 1 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 3,4,6, 7, 8
Fescue:Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug.20 to Oct. 10(best)and Feb. 15 to Mar.20.For
pure-stand broadcast'seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac.,for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed.Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass.Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations.Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only.Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques.Apply 150 to 2001b/ac.N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production;reduce N rates by 25%for grazing.Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and
Aug.20 to Sept. 30,with equal amounts in each window.Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2, 3,4, 6, 7
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont,corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs.nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply.2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage.Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 1201bs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production.Plant a cover crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1,3
Fescue:Piedmont
Adaptation:Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best)and Feb. 15 to Mar.20. For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 301b/ac.,for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed.Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass.Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations.Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only.Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques.Apply 150 to 2001b/ac.N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production;reduce N rates by 25%to 50%for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug.20 to Sept. 30,with equal amounts in each window.Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
89529.7 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 06-25-2014 Crop Note Page 2 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1;2,3,4, 5
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10(best)and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20.For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac.,for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed.Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass.Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands,0.25"in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus,and potassium
recommendations.Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only.Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques.Apply 150 to 2001b/ac.N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production;reduce N rates by 25%to 50%for grazing.Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug.20 to Sept. 30,with equal amounts in each window.Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation:Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10(best)and Feb. 15 to Mat'.20.For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac.,for drilled use 15 to 201b/ac. seed.Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass.Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25"in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus,and potassium
recommendations.Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only.Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques.Apply 150 to 2001b/ac.N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production;reduce N rates by 25%to 50%for grazing.Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30,with equal amounts in each window.Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 2
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10(best)and Feb. 15 to Mar.20.For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 301b/ac.,for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed.Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass.Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus,and potassium
recommendations.Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only.Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques.Apply 150 to 2001b/ac.N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production;reduce N rates by 25%to 50%for grazing.Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug.20 to Sept. 30,with equal amounts in each window.Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 06-25-2014 Crop Note Page 3 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 2, 3,4, 6, 7
Oats, Grain: Piedmont
In the Piedmont,oats and barley should be planted from October 1-October 25; and rye from October
15-November 10.For barley,plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU"Small Grain Production Guide". Also,increase the initial seeding
rate by at least 10%when planting no-till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and rye at 1-1 1/2
bushels/acre.Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2 deep:Adequate depth control is essential. Review the
NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at
planting.Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February-March.The total N is dependent on the
soil type.Plant samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the
oats,barley and rye. Timely management of diseases, insects and weeds are essential for profitable oat,
barley and rye production.
895297 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 06-25-2014 Crop Note Page 4 of 4

.'2 t'✓ Yf►
12
Ar-
F
_ f K t4__
�f3 y� C•. .:"sue. ...
YC
_•r"":r :cam o��• ,�v� r .
- 'iy.•."• r.p::=:fin- ai;�j. r,. R_ f �
_.sue F-• 'Q '
C�"f •: ^ - .
:-L
�..� �
�,j - Y�f: :.3.._....•_ _lei �''F'�(
z+' Q t
If
GASTON-LINCOLN COUNTY FSA OFFICE April 08, 2008
GASTON COUNTY
FARM # 2089
Ub" TRACT# 2685
T OWNER: G LARRY & MARY JEAN H PROCTOR
OPERATOR: MARY JEAN H PROCTOR
Disclaimer: Wetland identifiers do not represent the size, shape or specific determination of the area. Refer to your
nrininai HP.tarminafinn ((:PA-02B and attached macs)for exact wetland boundaries and determinations, or contact N

• ti - � 'ru�L'� _
a
,4-_
�_ 7 ,s l •YY� �..�� b
�-. .� �:"'-W f,i': � •S•T �' "yam` i'iYs'�'A�t� �i��� .1 4
.��'"k• • . — — .�::is ��• ,E
- .11'..�+ar' � '1` -ems tF _ •..���'':[, a.
mac• _ . � .J?. ! T jjjj � '�v_ M�p�
GASTON-LINCOLN COUNTY FSA OFFICE April 08, 2008
GASTON COUNTY
DA
FARM # 2089
TRACT#2686
_ OWNER: G LARRY & MARY JEAN H PROCTOR
OPERATOR: MARY JEAN H PROCTOR
Disclaimer: Wetland identifiers do not represent the size, shape or specific determination of the area. Refer to your
original determination (CPA-026 and attached maps) for exact wetland boundaries and determinations, or contact N

R44''
r C d
i' 'sx
�
= P 14. t
.2. � } Y �s�� .;"ss ;x t - t y ��Y.. + _f s �- :...i r�3s y.,�'.' ) •
12
� �' }� ,� ,';t T i• Fr;r a ? �3� f� .. .t".3g �s: � ������ p}-.� i R'� `r
a
ai��
f � _ - '�I - - -• .���,, ii-rya.
t
• Alk • • •

ry
WK �t r
��.a� � `' i S � ,"� �2.L��+'-""rrp''�� �c��;is� � —� g e � � 'f. ¢ "T' ` "S • � ,{
cle
01 V.,
jm
` ., .R.ry' .i "'1 yt•-?'`� jiY 1 k .�^`�„ ' y
,'��.F� ,y���"{•a� � Sys�'y R �e� ' y�� k � !�
dv
It C
1-4
' .� •. ��l^ �*' 'fit. Y � 'in 4� ` � ..� �.. r•
q
AA
9 q
F ,-ten:. Y "-, ",6•.a- ,ems::,; - .t�.r '4 J r,.� _' _ `� "+'P' "` �+s
w Ate .!
If
to
0,0
4 d< � r �r f � ; �Y Fly
•� y _r w ,y r�

.40
-;e •t JT r Zo: rf a a 4
`y'•a �r O7
IT
um
O i10
a9 J-aE7 C+c al'� Z .S �'�Ttt_SF$'• '� r • - • Y •'i •1.' f
."fir y � -. - "� .4 �"�' O•=ee_
.0 O ff•- -; _ -; Tq"i:i •�_ 'Ni ..
ran o -�� �..c ' •tY';� - '
.40
•K .t• - •Y.a �.}.
ei
�-,c ;>> .�. '�. ',T. �� gyp • O P.c: w` 1.:
�•
O•��� ❑i.s��.."-`}A� f�`':e���L.-� �`4 O c,.,, - 01- �: O Pa= •p�,
o--
'•�='-".,. ram.-.,—.; �, ;��•��{. �� �,.. a_.�,.,.i

EAKER DAIRY
WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
GASTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION: LOCATED on SR 1634 near
Intersection of SR 1634 & SR 1636
LONGITUDE - 0810 21" 16.08" W
LATITUDE - 0350 24" 16.91" N
PHONE: [phone]
JOB CLASS: V
DAIRY SIZE: Maximum Number Cattle in Waste
Management System
400 MILK COWS
100 DRY COWS
50 Heifers DAY OLD TO 200 LBS
PLANNED BY: Shawn Smith, District Conservationist
Dean Parker, Nat. Resource Conservationist
Mac Edgerton, Civil Engineer Technician
Samuel C. Bingham, Civil Engineer
APPROVED BY:
DATE: �� u
Revision complete July 2008 to bed freestalls with solids
separated from manure . A solids separator and dry stack
facility will be installed in lieu of practices to separate
sand.

INDEX
I . Waste Production on Farm
II . Waste Management Objective
A. Waste Storage Pond #1 at Freestall Barn
B. Waste Storage Pond #2 & #3 below Milk Parlor
C. Solid Separator
D. Clean Water Exclusion
E. Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas
F. Waste Utilization
G. Operation and Maintenance Plan
H. Emergency Action Plan
III . Rainfall and Runoff Data for the Year in Gaston County
IV. Waste Storage Pond #1, #2 and #3
V. Solids Manure Storage
VI . Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
B. Guttering
VI I . Lounging Areas, Stock Trails, Heavy Use Areas and
Filter Areas
VIII . Waste Utilization Plan
A. Management Facts (liquid Manure)
B. Management Facts (polluted water)
C. Nutrient Computations
IX. Operation and Maintenance Requirements

Appendix
Cost Incentives
Request for Cultural Resources Review (By Field Office)
Copy of USGS Map showing Site Location
Operation and Maintenance Plan
Waste Management Facility Site Evaluation
Geologic Investigation by Kim Kroeger, Geologist
Soil Mechanics Report
Clay Liner Thickness Calculation
Hazard Classification Data Sheet for Dams, 3 sheets
Vegetation Specification
Construction Specification, Earth Fill
Construction Specification, Clay Liner
Construction Specification, Concrete
Construction Specification, Steel Reinforcement
Construction Specification, Plastic Pipe and Plumbing
Construction Specification, Fabric Filter Cloth
Construction Specification, Waste Management Building
Structure
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
Waste Utilization Plan (by Field Office)
Old Design information for existing components located in
file in Gaston County District Field Office .
Drawings
System Plan View, 1 " = 100 ' 1 of 8
System Plan View, Pond #2 & #3 2 of 8
System Plan View, Pond #1 & Freestall 3 of 8
Waste Pond #1 - Embankment Detail 4 of 8
Waste Pond #2 - Embankment Detail 5 of 8
Concrete Detail 6 of 8
Silo Leachate Detail 7 of 8
Manure Transfer, Pipes & Chutes 8 of 8
Revised and Extra Drawings
Plan View, revised July 2008
Construction Detail, Freestall Barn & Solids Storage
Plan View, Ponds #2 & #3
Clean Water Pipe
Gravity Channel & Pump Pit
Manure Storage Facility, 8 ' High R/C Wall
Manure Storage Facility, 8 ' High R/C Wall
Dry Stack, Isometric View
Dry Stack, Front View & Framing Detail
Dry Stack, Plan View
Dry Stack, Bracing Detail

WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
I . Waste Production on Farm
A maximum of 400 cows will be milked on the Eaker Dairy
farm. The milk herd will be totally confined in freestall
barns. Lounging areas may be used occasionally. Manure
and milking parlor wash water are stored in three waste
storage ponds and dry stack facility for manure solids .
Waste is irrigated or tank hauled on pasture and cropland.
A maximum of 100 dry cows will be located on concrete
lot and pasture. Cattle will be fed silage on concrete lot .
Dry cow numbers fluctuates due to times of year when milk
cows are bred. Manure production and collection varies in
dry cow housing due to this cycle. 100 dry cows will be
used in design computations .
Fifty day old to 200 lb heifers are housed in hutches
and sheds near milking parlor.
All other heifers are housed other farms .
Runoff from trench silos is diverted into waste storage
ponds .

II . Waste Management Objective
The system economically handles all the waste described
above in a manner that does not degrade air, soil or water
resources. The system will prevent discharge of pollutants
to surface and ground water by recycling waste through soil
and plants .
The following components will make up the Waste
Management System.
A. Waste Storage Pond #1 at Freestall Barn
Of the 90% of the manure collected from a maximum of
400 milk cows at the freestall barns, the liquid portion
will flow into this pond. Note: Approximately 15% of the
volume will be separated out as solids that will be stored
in a dry stack facility. Silo, lot runoff and runoff around
compost facility is also collected in this pond. Collection
of silo leachate will be limited to mostly the first flush
and normal leachate flow from silos .
Waste in this pond will flow by gravity to the second
waste storage pond.
B. Waste Storage Pond #2 & #3 below Milk Parlor
Waste from waste storage pond #1 is transferred by
gravity into waste pond U . Milking Parlor wash water and
lot runoff behind milk parlor and dry cow feed area is
stored waste pond #2 . Waste from waste storage pond #2 is
transferred by gravity into waste pond #3 . Eight months of
manure storage with solids separation for 400 milk cows
housed in freestall barns, 10% of manure collected in parlor
from 400 cows and 50% of manure from 100 dry cows are stored
in waste storage ponds #1, #2 and U .
Tank hauling and irrigation is primarily used to empty
these ponds .
C. Solid Separator
A FAN manure solids separator is planned at freestall
barns to remove manure solids from waste stream. Mr. Eaker
plans on composting manure solids and using this material to
bed freestalls . It is estimated that of the 90% of the
manure collected at the freestall barn that 15% will be
removed by solids separator. Another source suggests that
0 . 6 cu ft/day/cow of manure solids can be collected at wet
density of 36 lbs/cu ft .
Dry stack facility with roof will be planned for these
manure solids.

❑. Clean Water Exclusion
Clean water is excluded from lounging areas and waste
storage ponds to the fullest extent possible. Diversions,
piping, and guttering will be used where practical .
E. Livestock Exclusion and Filter Areas
Livestock is fenced out of waste storage ponds .
Fencing creates 100 ft grass filter areas below lounging
areas. These filter areas infiltrate part of the first
flush and filter sediment and organic particles .
Areas downstream of stock trails and heavy use areas are
maintained as a grass sod.
F. Waste Utilization Plan
Sufficient land is available to properly spread waste
at locations, times, volumes, and rates that maintains air,
soil and water resources . Waste applications are based on
soil and waste analysis . See waste utilization plan
prepared for this system.
G. Operation and Maintenance Plan
The owner shall be responsible for operating and
maintaining the system. See operation plan prepared for
this system.
H. Emergency Action Plan
The emergency action plan is filed with waste the 0 & M
plan.
III . Rainfall and Runoff Data for the Year in Gaston County
SURFACE UNSURFACE
NORMAL RUNOFF RUNOFF
MONTH RAINFALL % DEPTH $ DEPTH NORMAL EVAP.
JAN. 3 . 94 52 2 . 05 20 0 . 79 1 . 7
FEB. 3 . 98 57 2 . 27 25 1 . 00 1 . 6
MAR. 4 . 63 57 2 . 64 24 1 . 11 3 . 0
APR. 3 . 45 59 2 . 04 26 0 . 90 3 . 8
MAY 3 . 85 58 2 . 23 24 0 . 92 3 . 9
JUN. 3 . 69 60 2 . 21 27 1 . 00 4 . 4
JUL. 4 . 44 60 2 . 66 27 1 . 20 4 . 3
AUG. 4 . 50 61 2 . 75 31 1 . 40 3 . 9
SEP. 3 . 85 67 2 . 58 33 1 . 27 3 . 2
OCT. 3 . 47 63 2 . 19 30 1 . 04 2 . 4
NOV. 2 . 94 59 1 . 73 26 0 . 76 1 . 7
DEC. 3 . 84 59 2 . 27 24 0 . 92 1 . 7

IV. Waste Storage Pond #1, #2 and #3
Waste Storage Pond #1 will collect manure and waste
water from the freestall barn, manure separation and solids
storage area. Waste will be transferred by gravity to waste
storage pond #3 . Transfer pipe control elevation will be
set 1 foot below emergency spillway elevation or 2 . 7 foot
below top of dam elevation.
Waste storage pond #2 will collect manure and waste
water from parlor area. Waste will be transferred by
gravity to waste pond #3 . Transfer pipe control elevation
will be set 1 foot below emergency spillway elevation or 2 . 0
foot below top of dam elevation.
A. Design Volumes
1 . Normal Runoff for 240 day period
NOTE: Normal runoff for 240 day period will used in design
Use average runoff values in Ag. Waste Management Field
Manual for Gaston County. The drainage area consist of silo
area that has flow limited to a notch 4" wide and 2" deep,
the roof of old barn and concrete area between freestall
barns, the vegetated area between barns and pond and the
manure solids separation and storage area .
Drainage Area besides Silo Area = 32, 000 sq ft
Surface = 25, 000 sq ft
Unsurface = 7, 000 sq ft
240 days Surface Runoff Depth = 17 . 77"
Sept - April Unsurface Runoff Depth = 7 . 79"
Surface Runoff= 17 . 77" * 25, 000 sq ft= 37, 021 cu ft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 7 . 79 * 7, 000 sq ft = 4 , 544 cu ft
12 in/ft
Silo Area Runoff - It is estimated that most of the normal
runoff will be captured through the concrete notch for
leachate.
Surface Runoff= 17 . 77" * 27, 322 sq ft= 40, 459 cu ft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 7 . 79 * 10, 000 sq ft = 6, 491 cu ft
12 in/ft
Total = 37, 021+4 , 544+40, 459+6, 491 = 88, 515 cu ft/240 day

2 : 25 yr - 24 hr runoff from freestalls, etc
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5 . 5
Runoff = 4 . 91"
Note : The 4"x2" orifice for leachate control will reduce
volume of 25 year storm runoff significantly. The volume of
silo area will not be added to the 25 yr-24 hr runoff .
25yr-24hr runoff= 4 . 91" * 32, 000 sq ft = 13, 093 cu ft
12 in/ft
3 . Pond #1 Freeboard + Emergency spillway stage = 1 . 7 ft
4 . Hydraulic Head - 1 foot of head is required to force
water into the transfer pipe .
S . Waste Volumes
Waste Volume from pond #1
400 milk cows are in freestall barns 90% of time and
85% of the manure collected is stored in waste pond. The
literature on solid separators indicates a wide range of
values for total solids removal . A conservative approach
will taken in the design of the waste storage ponds . A
lower solids removal rate of 15% will be used in design of
waste storage ponds for liquid.
Volume = 400 cows * 14 gal/day/cow * 240 days * 90% *85%
7 . 48 gal/cu ft
= 137, 455 cu ft
Waste Volume from milk parlor
400 milk cows are in milking parlor 10% of time.
Volume = 400 cows * 14 gal/day/cow * 240 days * 10%
7 . 48 gal/cu ft
= 17, 968 cu ft
100 dry cows are on lot 50% of time .
Volume = 100 dry cows * 14 gal/day/cow * 240 days * 50%
7 . 48 gal/cu ft
= 22, 460 cu ft
Total= 137, 455 cu ft + 17, 968 + 22, 460 = 177, 883 cu ft

6. Normal Runoff for 240 day period for Parlor Area
Use average runoff values in Ag. Waste Management Field
Manual for Gaston County.
Drainage Area = 30, 000 sq ft Surface = 10, 000 sq ft
Unsurface = 20, 000 sq ft
Try 240 days Surface Runoff Depth = 17 . 77"
Sept-April Unsurface Runoff Depth = 7 . 79"
Surface Runoff= 17 . 77" * 10, 000 sq ft= 14, 808 cu ft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 7 . 79 * 20, 000 sq ft = 12, 983 cu ft
12 in/ft
Total = 14, 808 + 12, 983 = 27, 791 cu ft
7 . Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface #2
30 . 2 - 19 . 1 = 11 . 1" = 0 . 9 ft/240 days
Volume = 0 . 9' x 84' x84' = 6, 350 cu ft
8 : Rainfall minus evaporation from pond #1
30 . 2 - 19 . 1 = 11 . 1" = 0 . 9 ft/240 days
Volume = 0 . 9' x 213' x 70' = 13, 419 cu ft
9 . 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface #2
Rainfall = 5 . 5" = . 5 ft
Volume = 0 . 5 x 84' x84' = 3, 528 cu ft
10 . 25 yr - 24 hr runoff from parlor area
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5 . 5
Runoff = 4 . 91"
25yr-24hr runoff= 4 . 91" * 30, 000 sq ft = 12, 275 cu ft
12 in/ft
11 . Waste Pond #3 Freeboard + ESW stage = 1 . 0 ft
12 . Parlor Water
400 cows x 5 gal/cow/day x 240 days/7 . 48 gal/cu ft
= 64, 171 cu ft

13 . Hydraulic Head - 1 foot of head is required to force
water into the transfer pipe for pond #2
14 . 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface #1
Volume = 0. 5' x 213' x 70' = 7, 455 cu ft
15. Waste Pond #2 freeboard + ESW stage - 1 . 0
16. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond #3
30 . 2 - 19 . 1 = 11 . 1" = 0 . 9 ft/240 days
17 . 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface #3
Rainfall = 5 . 5" _ . 5 ft
B. Summary of Design Volumes
1 . Waste Volume 177, 883 cu ft
2 . Normal Runoff, Parlor Area 27, 791 cu ft
3 . Normal Runoff from freestall, etc 88, 515 cu ft
4 . R-E from Pond #2 6, 350 cu ft
5 . R-E from Pond #1 13, 419 cu ft
6.. 25 yr direct rainfall from pond 2 3, 528 cu ft
7 . 25 yr runoff from Parlor Area 12, 275 cu ft
8 . 25 yr direct rainfall from pond 1 7, 455 cu ft
9 . 25 yr runoff from Freestall Area 13, 093 cu ft
10 . Parlor Water 64, 171 cu ft
TOTAL 414 , 480 cu ft
Pond #1 Direct
11 . Hydraulic Head for Pipe Transfer 1 . 0 ft
12 . Freeboard + Emergency Spillway Stage 1 . 7 ft
TOTAL 2 . 7 ft
Pond #2 Direct
13 . Hydraulic Head for Pipe Transfer 1 . 0 ft
14 . Freeboard + Emergency Spillway Stage 1 . 0 ft
2 . 0 ft
Pond #3 Direct
15 . Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface 0 . 9 ft
16 . 25 yr- 24 hr rainfall on pond surface 0 . 5 ft
17 . Freeboard + Emergency Spillway Stage 1 . 0 ft
TOTAL 2 . 4 ft

8 months storage available in Ponds #1, #2 and #3
Normal Pump-Out Volume
177, 883 + 27, 791 + 88, 515 + 6, 350 + 13, 419 + 64, 171
+. 9x296xl86
= 427, 679 cu ft per 240 days
= 650, 429 cu ft per 365 days
= 179 ac-in per year
= 4, 865, 000 gallons per year
Maximum pump out level
0 . 5 ' + 1 . 0 ' + (3, 528 + 12, 275 + 7, 455 + 13, 093) / (290' xl80' )
= 2 . 2'
D. Pump-Out Elevation and ESW Elevation
The waste storage pond for runoff should be hauled or
irrigated before the water level reaches the 25 yr - 24 hr
storage volume. This elevation is 2 . 2 ft below the top of
dam. The emergency spillway elevation is planned 1 . 0 foot
below the top of dam.
V. Solids Manure Storage
Manure slurry will be collected in collection pit at
freestall barn.
400 milk cows are typically in freestall barns 90% of
time. The rest of manure is collected at the milk parlor.
Manure in barns is scraped to collection pit . Of the volume
collected, it is estimated that volume removed will between
the following estimates .
1 . 15% of the manure volume excreted by dairy cow will be
separated with solids manure separator.
Volume 1 = 15% x 14 gal/day/7 . 48 gal/cu ft
_ . 28 cu ft/day/cow
2 . From "Special Report 945, Analysis of Separated Manure
Solids from Selected Manure Separators in Wlllamette
Valley, Oregon, Dairy Facilities" Note: The report
indicated a variability of 50% in measurements between
farms .
Volume 2 = 0 . 6 cu ft/day/cow @ 36 lbs/cu ft (wet)
Volume 1 = 400 cows x 14 gal/day/cow x 90% x 15% x 90 days
7 . 48 gal/cu ft
= 9, 096 cu ft/90 days
= 36, 889 cu ft/365 days
Volume 2 = 400 cows x 0 . 6 cu ft/cow/day x 90 days
= 21, 600 cu ft/90 days
= 87, 600 cu ft/365 days

C. Sizing Waste Storage Ponds #1, #2 & #3
Waste Storage Pond #1 behind freestall barns
213' x 70'
2 . 7'
2 : 1 2 : 1
2 : 1 7 . 3' 2 : 1
173' x 30'
Volume = 7 . 3/6 [173 x 30 + 202 . 2 x 59 . 2 + 4 (187 . 6 x 44 . 6) ]
= 61, 597 cu ft
Waste Storage Pond #2 behind Parlor
84' x 84'
2 . 0'
2 : 1 9. 0' 2 : 1
4 0' x 4 0'
Volume = 9 . 0/6 [40 x 40 + 76 x 76 + 4 (58 x 58) ]
= 31, 248 cu ft
Sizing Waste Pond #3
296' x 186'
2 . 4'
3 : 1 8 . 6' 3 : 1
230' x 120'
Volume = 8 . 6/6 [230 x 120 + 281 . 6 x 171 . 6 + 4 (255 . 8 x 145 . 8) ]
= 335, 850 cu ft
Design Volume all Ponds = 61, 597 + 31, 248 + 335, 850
= 428, 695 cu ft

A 40' x67' concrete heavy use area is planned for manure
solids separator, temporary storage and work area.
Storage volume on concrete heavy use area = 6' x25' x63
= 9, 450 cu ft
A roofed storage facility next to separator will be
installed to store solids removed from waste stream.
Dry Stack Volume - 5' x38' -7"x64' = 12, 347 cu ft
Total Solids Storage Volume = 9, 450 + 12, 347 cu ft
= 21, 797 cu ft
Front end loader will be used to move solids to compost
facility. Volume will be land applied or used in freestall
barn for bedding. The temporary storage area and roofed
storage area are designed to store 90 days of storage . Mr.
Eaker will manage the storage area to compost solids. A
primary composting will occur in temporary storage area at
solids separator. Secondary composting is planned under
roofed storage area . A final compost finishing will also
occur in roofed storage area by turning compost after 30
days or so.
A pump in pump pit at end of gravity channel will be used to
transfer manure to FAN separator. The pit is sized large
enough to store 2 days plus of manure slurry.
Volume = 400 cows x 14 gal/day x 2 days x 900
7 . 48 gal/cu ft
= 1, 348 cu ft
Pit Size = 8' x 14 ' x 14' = 1, 568 cu ft OK
Overflow from pump pit will go into waste storage pond #1 .
VI . Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
Clean water diversions will be maintained around waste
storage ponds. The District Conservationist will design all
diversions . Diversions shall be designed to carry the 25
year - 24 hour runoff plus capacity to store some sediment.
B. Guttering
Clean water shall be excluded to the fullest extent
possible by guttering. Any new roof runoff into feedlot
area will be guttered.

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
DWQ PHONE NUMBERS -70 q- (43,409
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - 3bv
SWCD 10 j
NRCS Spa 3- Q h 7-L1q 0
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for-all employees at the
facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation,this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow-possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field-actions include:
a. Immediately stop.waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff"
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s)that caused the runoff
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
1 December 18, 1996

D: Leakage from flush systems,houses, solid separators-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks-possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage,put in a
submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals,trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soiL
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury,fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a fixture rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger(either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ(Division of Water Quality)regional office;
Phone - - After hours,emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call
should include:your name, facility,telephone number,the details of the incident from item
2 above,the exact location of the facility,the location or direction of movement of the
spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters,call local EMS Phone number - -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES,phone number - - ,local SWCD office phone number - - , and
local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
2 December 18, 1996
I

4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off-site damage.
a. Contractors Name: 6t ^
b. Contractors Address: c� rryd!Ak Sb
c. Contractors Phone: ?OY- Lf'.3S" - -
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon(NRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: W + -
b. Phone: g
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage,repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
3 December 18, 1996

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush gutters • Accumulation of solids O Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as t/A
designed
O Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative . Decaying vegetation 9 Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems
Feeders • Feed spillage 6 Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g.,bunkers and troughs)to minimize the
,weemulation of decaying wastage
S Clean up spillage on a routine basis(e.g., 7-to 10-
day interval during summer; 15-to 30-day interval
during winter)
AMIC-November 11, 1996,page 1

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed ++❑ Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment(e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products)
❑ Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed
Animal holding areas • Accumulations of animal 0 Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
wastes and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal
0 Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimi a accumulations of wastes
(Le., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed)
Dry manure handling . Accumulations of animal ❑ Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
systems wastes 7-to 10-day interval during summer; l5-to 30-day
interval during winter)where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
❑ Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
❑ Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
hand ling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology,Box 7613,North Carolina State University,Raleigh,NC 27695-7613.
A ffC -November 11, 1996,page 2

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Dead animals a Carcass decomposition Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water a Improper drainage Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities a Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto a Poorly maintained access Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access _
Additional Information: Available From
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 RuleBMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System—Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory;EBAE 209-95 NCSU—BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage;EBAE 103-83 NCSU BAE
Management of Dairy Wastewater;EBAE 106-83 NCSU BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU BAE
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies;PROI07, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
April 18,2006,page 3

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Dairy production Ff Vegetative or wooded buffers
Or"Recommended best management practices
Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn • Wet manure-covered Scrape or flush daily
alley surfaces surfaces nRoutine
roinote drying with proper ventilation
checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants,pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas • Urine Promote drying with proper ventilation
• Partial microbial C�Replace wet or manure-covered bedding
decomposition
Manure dry stacks • Partial microbial Or Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
decomposition
Storage tank or • Partial microbial 0' Bottom or mid-level loading
basin surface decomposition C3 Tank covers
• Mixing while filling O Basin surface mats of solids
• Agitation when emptying 0 MiYuxnize lot runoff and liquid additions
0�jAgitate only prior to manure removal
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin • Partial microbial tir Liquid drainage from settled solids
surfaces decomposition Remove solids regularly
Mixing while filling
• Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry, or • Agitation when spreading [I d injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader . Volatile as emissions � ^'ash residual manure from spreader after use
outlets g irproven biological additives or oxidants
April 18,2006,page 1

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Uncovered manure, a Volatile gas emissions while 0 Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on drying 0 Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces Vproven
pread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks a Agitation of recycled lagoon 0 Flush tank covers ��
liquid while tanks are filling 0 Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti-siphon vents
Outside drain a Agitation during wastewater 0 Box covers
collection or junction conveyance
boxes
Lift stations a Agitation during sump tank 0 Sump tank covers IV
fA
Ming and drawdown
End of drainpipes at a Agitation during wastewater 0 Extend discharge point of pipes underneath -
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level 1914
Lagoon surfaces a Volatile gas emission 8-Proper lagoon liquid capacity
a Biological mixing Correct lagoon startup procedures
a Agitation 0'Mum surface area-to-volume ratio
Ef Minimum agitation when pumping
6 Mechanical aeration
Ef proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler a High pressure agitation I igate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles 10 Wind drift um recommended operating procedure
Dump intake near lagoon liquid surface
Vump from second-stage lagoon
Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
April 18,2006,page 2

Version—November 26,2018
Mortality Management Methods
Indicate which method(s) will be implemented.
When selecting multiple methods indicate a primary versus secondary option.
Methods other than those listed must be approved by the State Veterinarian.
Primary Secondary Routine Mortality
a Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours of knowledge of animal
death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water
(G.S.106403). The bottom of the burial pit should be at least one foot above the seasonal
high water table. Attach burial location map and plan.
U a Landfill at municipal solid waste facility permitted by NC DEQ under GS 15A NCAC
U 13B .0200.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7.
Complete incineration according to 02 NCAC 52C .0102.
A composting system approved and permitted by the NC Department of Agriculture&Con-
sumer Services Veterinary Division (attach copy of permit). If compost is distributed off-farm,
additional requirements must be met and a permit is required from NC DEQ.
In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the
NC Department of Agriculture &Consumer Services (G.S. 106-549.70).
Q Any method which, in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian, would make possible
the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health.
(Written approval by the State Veterinarian must be attached).
Mass Mortality Plan
Mass mortality plans are required for farms covered by an NPDES permit. These plans are
also recommended for all animal operations. This plan outlines farm-specific mortality man-
agement methods to be used for mass mortality. The NCDA&CS Veterinary Division sup-
ports a variety of emergency mortality disposal options; contact the Division for guidance.
• A catastrophic mortality disposal plan is part of the facility's CAWMP and is activated
when numbers of dead animals exceed normal mortality rates as specified by the State
Veterinarian.
• Burial must be done in accordance with NC General Statutes and NCDA&CS Veterinary
Division regulations and guidance.
• Mass burial sites are subject to additional permit conditions (refer to facility's animal
waste management system permit).
• In the event of imminent threat of a disease emergency, the State Veterinarian may enact
additional temporary procedures or measures for disposal according to G.S. 106-399.4.
f "h�
Signature of Farm Owner/Manager Date
i nature of Technical Spetiali t Ate

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
DWQ
PHONE NUMBERS -70 q_
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM l v- b
SWCD — /
NRCS 22$- a R 7—L101 0
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for-all employees at the
facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation,this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow-possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field-actions include:
a. Immediately stop.waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s)that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
1 December 18, 1996

D: Leakage from flush systems,houses, solid separators-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems,or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks-possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage,put in a
submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals,trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury,fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger(either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ(Division of Water Quality)regional office;
Phone - - After hours,emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call
should include:your name,facility,telephone number,the details of the incident from item
2 above,the exact location of the facility,the location or direction of movement of the
spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number - -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES,phone number - - ,local SWCD office phone number - - , and
local MRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
2 December 18, 1996

4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off-site damage.
a. Contractors Name: �� .�i^
b. Contractors Address: rryvt/U Alt. a go Z
c. Contractors Phone: b —
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon(MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name:_ 7u�+ l n ham-- - - -
b. Phone: 9" -
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage,repair the system,and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
3 December 18, 1996

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush gutters • Accumulation of solids O Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as �/A
designed
O Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids V Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to S inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation 21 Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems
Feeders • Feed spillage Ef Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g.,bunkers and troughs)to minimize the
.actumulation of decaying wastage
Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7-to 10-
day interval during summer; 15-to 30-day interval
during winter)
AMIC-November 11, 1996,page 1

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed 97Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products)
O Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed
Animal holding areas . Accumulations of animal WEliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
wastes and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
Aturbance by animals is minimal
T' Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(Le., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed)
Dry manure handling . Accumulations of animal 0 Remove spillage on a routine basis(e.g.,
systems wastes 7-to 10-day interval during summer; 15-to 30-day
interval during winter)where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
O Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
O Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handfinR areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service,Department of Entomology, Box 7613,North Carolina State University,Raleigh,NC 27695-7613.
.. AMIC -November 11, 1996, page 2

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Dead animals a Carcass decomposition Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water a Improper drainage Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities a Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto a Poorly maintained access Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access
Additional Information: Available From :
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 RuleBMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System—Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory;EBAE 209-95 NCSU BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage;EBAE 103-83 NCSU BAE
Management of Dairy Wastewater;EBAE 106-83 NCSU BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU—BAE
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies;PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
Apri118,2006,page 3

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
_ Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Dairy production Er Vegetative or wooded buffers
O�Recommended best management practices
C�( Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn . Wet manure-covered er Scrape or flush daily
alley surfaces surfaces nRoutine
romote drying with proper ventilation
checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants,pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas • Urine 13' Promote drying with proper ventilation
• Partial microbial L�Replace wet or manure-covered bedding
decomposition
Manure dry stacks • Partial microbial Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
decomposition
Storage tank or • Partial microbial Bottom or mid-level loading
basin surface decomposition 0 Tank covers
• Mixing while filling 0 Basin surface mats of solids
• Agitation when emptying 0 jy� lot runoff and liquid additions
Er-) ate only prior to manure removal
or Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin • Partial microbial Liquid drainage from settled solids
surfaces decomposition Remove solids regularly
Mixing while filling
• A;fitation when emptying
Manure, slurry, or • Agitation when spreading 0',,Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader . Volatile as emissions 2 Wash residual manure from spreader after use
outlets g irproven biological additives or oxidants
April 18,2006,page 1

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Uncovered manure, a Volatile gas emissions while 0 Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on drying O Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces PFroven
pread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks a Agitation of recycled lagoon 0 Flush tank covers N�
liquid while tanks are filling 0 Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti-siphon vents
Outside drain a Agitation during wastewater 0 Box covers
collection or junction conveyance
boxes
Lift stations a Agitation during sump tank 0 Sump tank covers rA1/19
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at a Agitation during wastewater O Extend discharge point of pipes underneath ���
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces a Volatile gas emission 8'Proper lagoon liquid capacity
0 Biological mixing Correct lagoon startup procedures
a Agitation 0'Minimum surface area-to-volume ratio
Ul Minimum agitation when pumping
6 Mechanical aeration
Ef.PWven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler a High pressure agitation agate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles a Wind drift ' um recommended operating procedure
Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
0 ;ump from second-stage lagoon
Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
April 18,2006,page 2

IV. Waste Storage Pond #1, #2 and #3
i
Waste Storage Pond #1 will collect manure and waste
water from the freestall barn, manure separation and solids
storage area. Waste will be transferred by gravity to waste
storage pond #3. Transfer pipe control elevation will be
set 1 foot below emergency spillway elevation or 2. 7 foot
below top of dam elevation.
Waste storage pond #2 will collect manure and waste
water from parlor area. Waste will be transferred by I
gravity to waste pond #3. Transfer pipe control elevation
will be set 1 foot below emergency spillway elevation or 2 . 0
foot below top of dam elevation.
A. Design Volumes
1 . Normal Runo.ff for 240 day period
NOTE: Normal runoff for 240 day period will used in design
Use average runoff values in Ag. Waste Management Field
Manual for Gaston County. The drainage area consist of silo
area that has flow limited to a notch 4" wide and 2" deep,
the roof of old barn and concrete area between freestall
barns, the vegetated area between barns and pond and the
manure solids separation and storage area.
Drainage Area besides Silo Area = 32, 000 sq ft
Surface = 25, 000 sq ft
Unsurface = 7, 000 sq ft
240 days Surface Runoff Depth = 17. 77"
Sept - April Unsurface Runoff Depth = 7. 79"
Surface Runoff= 17. 77" * 25, 000 sq ft= 37, 021 cu ft
12 in/ft
i
Unsurface Runoff= 7 . 79 * 7, 000 sq ft = 4, 544 cu ft
12 in/ft
Silo Area Runoff - It is estimated that most of the normal
runoff will be captured through the concrete notch for
leachate.
Surface Runoff= 17. 77" * 27, 322 sq ft= 40, 459 cu ft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 7 . 79 * 10, 000 sq ft = 6, 491 cu ft
12 in/ft
Total = 37, 021+4, 544+40, 459+6, 491 = 88, 515 cu ft/240 day
i

2 : 25 yr - 24 hr runoff from freestalls, etc
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5. 5
Runoff = 4 . 91"
i
Note: The 4"x2" orifice for leachate control will reduce
volume of 25 year storm runoff significantly. The volume of
silo area will not be added to the 25 yr-24 hr runoff.
25yr-24hr runoff= 4 . 91" * 32, 000 sq ft = 13, 093 cu ft
12 in/ft
3 . Pond #1 Freeboard + Emergency spillway stage = 1. 7 ft
4 . Hydraulic Head - 1 foot of head is required to force
water into the transfer pipe.
S. Waste Volumes
Waste Volume from pond #1
400 milk cows are in freestall barns 90% of time and
85% of the manure collected is stored in waste pond. The
literature on solid separators indicates a wide range of
values for total solids removal. A conservative approach
will taken in the design of the waste storage ponds. A
lower solids removal rate of 15% will be used in design of
waste storage ponds for liquid.
Volume = 400 cows * 14 gal/day/cow * 240 days * 90% *85%
7 . 48 gal/cu ft
= 137, 455 cu ft
Waste Volume from milk parlor
400 milk cows are in milking parlor 10% of time.
Volume = 400 cows * 14 gal/day/cow * 240 days * 10%
7. 48 gal cu ft
= 17, 968 cu ft
100 dry cows are on lot 50% of time.
Volume = 100 dry cows * 14 gal/day/cow * 240 days * 50%
7 . 48 gal/cu ft
= 22, 460 cu ft
Total= 137, 455 cu ft + 17, 968 + 22, 460 = 177, 883 cu ft

6. Normal Runoff for 240 day period for Parlor Area
Use average runoff values in Ag. Waste Management Field
Manual for Gaston County.
Drainage Area = 30, 000 sq ft Surface = 10, 000 sq ft
Unsurface = 20, 000 sq ft
Try 240 days Surface Runoff Depth = 17 . 77"
Sept-April Unsurface Runoff Depth = 7 . 79"
Surface Runoff= 17. 77" * 10, 000 sq ft= 14, 808 cu ft
12 in ft
Unsurface Runoff= 7 . 79 * 20, 000 sq ft = 12, 983 cu ft
12 in ft
Total = 14, 808 + 12, 983 = 27,791 cu ft
7. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface #2
30.2 - 19. 1 = 11. 1" = 0. 9 ft/240 days
Volume = 0. 9' x 84' x84' = 6, 350 cu ft
8 : Rainfall minus evaporation from pond #1 }
i
30.2 - 19. 1 = 11. 1" = 0. 9 ft/240 days
Volume = 0. 9' x 213' x 70' = 13, 419 cu ft
9. 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface #2
Rainfall = 5. 5" _ . 5 £t
Volume = 0. 5 x 84' x84' = 3, 528 cu ft
10 . 25 yr - 24 hr runoff from parlor area
i
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4. 91" i
i
25yr-24hr runoff= 4. 91" * 30, 000 sq ft = 12,275 cu ft
12 in/ft
11 . Waste Pond #3 Freeboard + ESW stage = 1 . 0 ft
i
12 . Parlor Water
I
400 cows x 5 gal/cow/day x 240 days/7. 48 gal/cu ft
64, 171 cu ft
i

13. Hydraulic Head - 1 foot of head is required to force
t
water into the transfer pipe for pond #2
k -
14 . 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface #1
Volume = 0. 5' x 213' x 70' = 7,455 cu ft
15. Waste Pond #2 freeboard + ESW stage - 1 . 0
16. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond #3
30.2 - 19. 1 = 11. 1" = 0. 9 ft/240 days
17. 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface #3
Rainfall = 5. 5" _ . 5 ft
B. Summary of Design Volumes
1 . Waste Volume 177, 883 cu ft
2. Normal Runoff, Parlor Area 27, 791 cu ft
3. Normal Runoff from freestall, etc 88, 515 cu ft
4 . R-E from Pond #2 6, 350 cu ft
5. R-E from Pond #1 13, 419 cu ft
6., 25 yr direct rainfall from pond 2 3, 528 cu ft
7 . 25 yr runoff from Parlor Area 12, 275 cu ft
8 . 25 yr direct rainfall from pond 1 7, 455 cu ft
9. 25 yr runoff from Freestall Area 13, 093 cu ft
10. Parlor Water 64, 171 cu ft
TOTAL 414, 480 cu ft
Pond #1 Direct
11 . Hydraulic Head for Pipe Transfer 1. 0 ft
12 . Freeboard + Emergency Spillway Stage 1. 7 ft
TOTAL 2. 7 ft
Pond #2 Direct
13 . Hydraulic Head for Pipe Transfer 1. 0 ft
14 . Freeboard + Emergency Spillway Stage 1. 0 ft
2.0 ft
Pond #3 Direct
15. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface 0. 9 ft
16. 25 yr- 24 hr rainfall on pond surface 0. 5 ft
17 . Freeboard + Emergency Spillway Stage 1. 0 ft
TOTAL 2 . 4 ft
i
I
I
i

8 months storage available in Ponds #1, #2 and #3
Normal Pump-Out Volume
177, 883 + 27, 791 + 88, 515 + 6, 350 + 13, 419 + 64, 171
+. 9x296xl86
= 427, 679 cu ft per 240 days
= 650, 429 cu ft per 365 days
= 179 ac-in per year
= 4, 865, 000 gallons per year
Maximum pump out level
0. 5 ' + 1. 0' + (3, 528 + 12, 275 + 7, 455 + 13, 093) / (290'x180' )
2 .2'
D. Pump-Out Elevation and ESW Elevation
The waste storage pond for runoff should be hauled or
irrigated before the water level reaches the 25 yr - 24 hr
storage volume. This elevation is 2.2 ft below the top of
dam. The emergency spillway elevation is planned 1. 0 foot
below the top of dam.
V. Solids Manure Storage
Manure slurry will be collected in collection pit at
freestall barn.
400 milk cows are typically in freestall barns 90% of
time. The rest of manure is collected at the milk parlor.
Manure in barns is scraped to collection pit. Of the volume
collected, it is estimated that volume removed will between
the following estimates.
1. 15% of the manure volume excreted by dairy cow will be
separated with solids manure separator.
Volume 1 = 15% x 14 gal/day/7. 48 gal/cu ft
.28 cu ft/day/cow
2. From "Special Report 945, Analysis of Separated Manure
Solids from Selected Manure Separators in Wlllamette
Valley, Oregon, Dairy Facilities" Note: The report
indicated a variability of 50% in measurements between i
farms.
Volume 2 = 0. 6 cu ft/day/cow @ 36 lbs/cu ft (wet)
i
Volume 1 = 400 cows x 14 gal/day/cow x 90% x 15% x 90 days
7. 48 gal cu ft
= 9, 096 cu ft/90 days
= 36, 889 cu ft/365 days
Volume 2 = 400 cows x 0. 6 cu ft/cow/day x 90 days
i
= 21, 600 cu ft/90 days
= 87, 600 cu ft/365 days
i
I
I

C. Sizing Waste Storage Ponds #1, #2 & #3
} Waste Storage Pond #1 behind freestall barns
213' x 70'
2. 7'
2 : 1 ` 2: 1
2: 1 \r 7 . 3' 2 : 1
173' x 30'
Volume = 7 . 3/6[173 x 30 + 202.2 x 59. 2 + 4 (187 . 6 x 44 . 6) ]
= 61, 597 cu ft
i
Waste Storage Pond #2 behind Parlor
84' x 84'
2. 0'
2: 1 9. 0' 2 : 1
4 0' x 4 0'
Volume = 9. 0/6 [40 x 40 + 76 x 76 + 4 (58 x 58) ]
= 31,248 cu ft
Sizing Waste Pond #3
296' x 186'
2. 4'
\"�\:
3: 1 8 . 6' 3: 1
230' x 120'
Volume = 8 . 6/6 [230 x 120 + 281 . 6 x 171 . 6 + 4 (255. 8 x 145.8) ]
= 335, 850 cu ft
Design Volume all Ponds = 61, 597 + 31, 248 + 335, 850
F
428, 695 cu ft

A 401x67' concrete heavy use area is planned for manure
- solids separator, temporary storage and work area.
n
Storage volume on concrete heavy use area = 6' x2�5'x63
= 9, 450 cu ft
A roofed storage facility next to separator will be
installed to store solids removed from waste stream.
Dry Stack Volume - 5'x381 -7"x64' = 12, 347 cu ft
Total Solids Storage Volume = 9, 450 + 12, 347 cu ft
= 21,797 cu ft
Front end loader will be used to move solids to compost
facility. Volume will be land applied or used in freestall
barn for bedding. The temporary storage area and roofed
storage area are designed to store 90 days of storage. Mr.
Eaker will manage the storage area to compost solids. A
primary composting will occur in temporary storage area at
solids separator. Secondary composting is planned under
roofed storage area. A final compost finishing will also
occur in roofed storage area by turning compost after 30
days or so.
3
A pump in pump pit at end of gravity channel will be used to
transfer manure to FAN separator. The pit is sized large
enough to store 2 days plus of manure slurry.
Volume = 400 cows x 14 gal/day x 2 days x 900
7 . 48 gal/cu ft
= 1, 348 cu ft
Pit Size = 8' x 14' x 14' = 1, 568 cu ft OK
Overflow from pump pit will go into waste storage pond #1.
VI . Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
Clean water diversions will be maintained around waste
storage ponds. The District Conservationist will design all
diversions. Diversions shall be designed to carry the 25
year - 24 hour runoff plus capacity to store some sediment.
B. Guttering
i
r
Clean water shall be excluded to the fullest extent j
possible by -guttering. Any new roof runoff into feedlot
area will be guttered.