360004_Permit Renewal Application 2019_20190410

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Animal Waste Management Systems
Request for Certification of Coverage
Facility Currently covered by an Expiring Sate Non-Discharge General Permit
On September 30, 2019, the North Carolina State Non-Discharge General Permits for Animal Waste Management Systems will
expire. As required by these permits, facilities that have been issued Certificates of Coverage to operate under these State
Non-Discharge General Permits must apply for renewal at least 180 days prior to their expiration date. Therefore, all applications
must be received by the Division of Water Resources by no later than April 3,2019.
Please do not leave any question unanswered. Please verify all information and make any necessary corrections below.
Application must be signed and dated by the Permittee.
1. Farm Number: 36-0004 Certificate Of Coverage Number: AWC360004
2. Facility Name: Eaker Dairy,Inc.
3. Landowner's Name(same as on the Waste Management Plan): Eaker Dairy Inc
4. Landowner's Mailing Address: 610 Roy Eaker Rd
City: Chen vy ille State: NC Zip: 28021
Telephone Number: 704-435-6231 Ext. E-mail:
5. Facility's Physical Address: 610 Roy Eaker Rd
City: Cherrvville State: NC Zip: 280218207
6. County where Facility is located: Gaston
7. Farm Manager's Name(if different from Landowner):
g. Farm Manager's telephone number(include area code):
9. Integrator's Name(if there is not an Integrator,write"None"):
10. Operator Name(OIC): Cameron R.Eaker Phone No.: 704-435-6231 OIC#: 20943
11. Lessee's Name(if there is not a Lessee,write"None"):
12. Indicate animal operation type and number:
Current Permit: Operations Type Allowable Count
Cattle-Dairy Calf W 100
Cattle-Dry Cow 100
Cattle-Milk Cow W fy o D O
Operation Types:
Swine Cattle Dry Poultry Other Types
Wean to Finish Dairy Calf Non Laying Chickens Horses-Horses
Wean to Feeder Dairy Heifer Laying Chickens Horses-Other
Farrow to Finish Milk Cow Pullets Sheep-Sheep
Feeder to Finish Dry Cow Turkeys Sheep-Other
Farrow to Wean Beef Stocker Calf Turkey Pullet
Farrow to Feeder Beef Feeder
Boar/Stud Beef Broad Cow Wet Poultry
Gilts Other Non Laying Pullet
Other Layers

13. Waste Treatment and Storage Lagoons (Verify the following information is accurate and complete. Make all necessary
corrections and provide missing data.)
Design
Estimated Liner Type Estimated Freeboard
Structure Date (Clay,Synthetic, Capacity Surface Area "Redline"
Name Built Unknown) (Cubic Feet) (Square Feet) (Inches)
LIQUID -1� 1 (l l U 6 L-A 6(, �-j 7 �� q l O 30.00
PUSH-OFF $ 2 19 io C.L.AI/ �3 'Py41� `7 © C 18.00
I-W( 10 k3 a0 o CLAY �53�850 55 60
soi'j O-'S-A-� 0'2 v �
Mail one (1) copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with this completed and signed application
as required by NC General Statutes 143-215.10C(d)to the address below.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
1. The most recent Waste Utilization Plan(WUP),signed by the owner and a certified technical specialist,containing:
a. The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields(e.g.irrigation,injection,etc.)
b. A map of every field used for land application(for example:irrigation map)
c. The soil series present on every land application field
d. The crops grown on every land application field
e. The Realistic Yield Expectation(RYE)for every crop shown in the WUP
f. The maximum PAN to be applied to every land application field
g. The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
h. The required NRCS Standard specifications
2. A site map/schematic
3. Emergency Action Plan
4. Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
5. Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
6. Mortality Control Checklist with selected method noted-Use the enclosed updated Mortality Control Checklist
7. Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.) Please be sure the above table is accurate and
complete. Also provide any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to
your facility.
8. Operation and Maintenance Plan
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal.
(e.g.composting,digesters,waste transfers,etc.)
As a second option to mailing paper copies of the application package, you can scan and email one signed copy of the
application and all the CAWMP items above to: [e-mail]

I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that,
if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not
included,this application package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false statement,
representation, or certification in any application may be subject to civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation. (18 U.S.C.
Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both for
a similar offense.)
Printed Name of Signing Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all landowners should sign. If Landowner is a
corporation,signature should be by a principal executive officer of the corporation):
Name: 1 Q✓n if r D La -e r Title: Ire S J P i G-Ofi PY 1241 ,
na1 , C-
Signature: Date:
9 - / 3 -_ �
Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number:[phone]
E-mail:[e-mail]
FORM: RENEWAL-STATE GENERAL 02/2019

5
ROY COOPER :, 1
MICHAEL S.REGAN! �
5ecr�lvey .�� w
LINDA CULPEPPER NORTH CAROLINA
&rector Environmental Quality
February 26,2019
Eaker Dairy Inc
Eaker Dairy,Inc.
610 Roy Eaker Rd
Cherryville,NC 28021
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring State General Permit
Dear Permittee:
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation State Non-Discharge General Permits,
which expire on September 30, 2019. Copies of the new animal waste operation State Non-Discharge General Permits are available
at https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-quality-re iog nal-operations/afo or by writing or calling:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number:[phone]
In order to assure your continued coverage under the State Non-Discharge General Permits, you must submit an application for
permit coverage to the Division. Enclosed you will find a 'Request for Certificate of Coverage Facility Currently Covered by an
Expiring State Non-Discharge General Permit." The application form must be completed, signed and returned by April 3, 2019.
Please note that you must include one (1) copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with the
completed and signed application form. A list of items included in the CAWMP can be found on page 2 of the renewal
application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to$25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the State Non-Discharge General Permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feel
free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Branch staff at 919-707-9100.
Sincerely,
A 1'��'
Jon Risgaard,Section Chief
Animal Feeding Operations and Groundwater Section
Enclosures
cc(w/o enclosures): Mooresville Regional Office,Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Gaston County Soil and Water Conservation District
AFOG Section Central Files-AWC360004
North Caro�.ina Department of Environmental Quality I DhAsion of Water Resources
512 N.Salisbury St.1 1636 Bail Serve Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27599-1636
^'^ 919.707.WDO

Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
Existing or New or :Expanded -"(please circle one
General Information: Permit No: AWC360004
Name of Farm: Eaker Dairy Inc. Facility No: 36 --0004
Owner(s)Name: Eaker Dairy Inc. Phone No: 704-435-6231
Mailing Address: 610 Roy Eaker Rd Cherryville NC 28021-8207
Farm Location: County Farm is located in: Gaston
Latitude and Longitude: 35' 24' 17" / 81' 21' 16" Integrator:
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below(Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): In Cherryville, off hwy 150 turn on Cherry St Ext. and travel north
For '/2 mile. Bear right on to Roy Eaker Rd; farm is 2 miles on right.
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type ofPouluy No. of Animals Type of Dairy No. of Animals
o Wean to Feeder o Layer 4 Milking 1000
o Feeder to Finish o Non-Layer 4 Dry 100
o Farrow to Wean Type of Beef No. of Animals o Heifers
o Farrow to Feeder o Brood q Calves 100
o Farrow to Finish o Feeders
o Gilts o Stockers
o Boars Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Expanding Operation Only *Note*Dry Cows are pastured and Calves are raised offsite.
Previous Design Capacity: 550 Additional Design Capacity: 450 Total Design Capacity: 1000
Acreage Available for Application: 999 Required Acreage: 751
Number of waste structures: 4 Total Capacity: 450,492 Cubic Feet(ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the waste structures(please circle one or both as applicable)
Owner/Manager Agreement
I(we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I(we)understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a permit application and a new certification to be submitted to the
Division of Water Resources(DWR)and permit approval received before the new animals are stocked. I(we)understand that
there must be no discharge of animal waste from the storage system to surface waters of the state unless specifically allowed
under a permit from DWR and there must not be run-off from the application of animal waste. I (we)understand that run-off
of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical standards developed by the USDA-
Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS). The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the DWR Regional
Office and the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District(SWCD). I (we) know that any modification must be
approved by a technical specialist and submitted to the DWR Regional Office and local SWCD and required approvals
received from DWR prior to implementation. A change in farm ownership requires a permit application to be sent to DWR
along with a new certification(if the approved plan is changed).
Name of Land Owner: a rYl • h S �'1, EG
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC-September 18,2006 1

Technical Specialist Certification
LAs a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
NCAC 6H .0104, I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Water Resources as specified in 15A
NCAC 2T .1300 (formerly 2H .0217) and the USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil
and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2T .1300(formerly 2H .0217)and 15A NCAC 6F .0101-.0105.
The following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical specialist who
may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, 1), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are
technically competent.
IL Certification of Design
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
o Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): David R Freeman
Affiliation Gaston SWCD Date Work Completed: 4/11/2014
Address (A e icy):1303 Dallas Cherryyille Hwy Dallas NC 28034 Phone No.:704-922-4181
Signature: Date: 8/13 1
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations(buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is suitable
for waste management;and the hydraulic and nutrient loading rates are appropriate for the site and receiving crop.
Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print): Clifford Dean Parker, Jr
Affiliation Gaston SWCD Date Work Completed: 5/24/2018
Address (Agency : 1303 Dallas Cherryyille Hwy Dallas NC 28034 Phone No.: 704-922-4181
Signature: A4 Date: '3
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
o Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Clifford Dean Parker, Jr.
Affiliation Gaston SWCD Date Work Completed: 5/24/2018
Address (Agency), 1303 Dallas Qerryyille Hwy Dallas NC 28034 Phone No.: 704-922-4181
Signature: - Date: ?2P
AWC-Septemb ;'200

D). Application and Handling Equipment
Check the appropriate box
Existing or expandingfacility with existing waste application equipment (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan).
o New,expanded,or existingfy without existing waste application equipment for spray irrigation. (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
o New, expanded, or existingfacility acility without existing waste application equipment for land spreading not using
spray irrigation. (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print): Clifford Dean Parker, Jr.
Affiliation Gaston SWCD Date Work Completed: 5/24/2018
Address (Agency): 1 3 Dallas Chegyyille Hwy Dallas NC 28034 Phone No.: 704-/922-4181
Signature: - c � Date:
E) Odor Control, Insect Control, Mortality Management and Emergency Action Plan (SD,
SI,WUP,RC or I)
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checklist,an Insect Control
Checklist, a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency Action Plan. Sources of both odors and insects
have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Mortality Management Plan and the Emergency Action Plan are complete and can be implemented by this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print): Clifford Dean Parker, Jr.
Affiliation Gaston SWCD Date Work Completed: 5/24/2018
Address (Agency): 1303 Dallas Cherryville Hwy Dallas NC 28034 Phone No.: 704-922-4181
Signature: Date:
F)Written Notice of New or Expanding Swine Farm
The following signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21, 1996,when was it constructed or last expanded .I(we)
certify that I(we)have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners who own
property located across a public road,street,or highway from this new or expanding swine farm. The notice was in ompliance
with the requirements of NCGS 106-805. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified are attached.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Manager (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
AWC-September 18,2006 3

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection, Storage, Treatment Installation
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds,have been installed in
accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist(Please Print): David R Freeman
Affiliation Gaston SWCD Date Work Completed: 4/11/2014
Address (Agency): 1303 Dallas Cherryville Hwy Dallas NC 28034 Phone No.: 704-922-4181
Signature:h l Date: 8 1 E
B) Land Application Site (WUP)
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Clifford Dean Parker, Jr.
Affiliation Gaston SWCD Date Work Completed: 5/24/2018
Address (Agency): 1303 Dallas Cherryyille Hwy Dallas NC 28034 Phone No.: 704-922-4181
Signature: Date: /4
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots (RC)
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the plan.
Foy facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Clifford Dean Parker, Jr.
Affiliation Gaston SWCD Date Work Completed: 5/24/2018
Address (Agency): 303 Dallas ChyZyyille Hwy Dallas NC 28034 Phone No.: 7 4-922-4181
Signature: t( ✓ Date: � /
D) Application and Handlinlz Equipment Installation (WUP or I)
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use; calibration
and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
o Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the
contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Clifford Dean Parker, Jr.
Affiliation Gaston SWCD Date Work Completed: 4/11/2014
Address (Agency): 1303 Dallas Cherryville Hwy Dallas NC 28034 Phone No.: 704-922-4181
Signature: Date: /S
AWC-September 18,2006 4

E) Odor Control, Insect Control and Mortality Management (SD, SI, WUP, RC or I)
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Clifford Dean Parker, Jr.
Affiliation Gaston SWCD Date Work Completed: 5/24/2018
Address (Agency): 303 Dallas Cherryville Hwy Dallas NC 28034 Phone No.: 704-922-4181
Signature: Dater T51
/ V
Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Resources at the following address:
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the DWR Regional Office and the local Soil and Water Conservation
District Office and to keep a copy in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC-September 18,2006 5

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ -70 q-
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM `7 V' $ - -3vv
SWCD '?0 - iZ I `irk yl
NRCS xa a 8 -7-Lo o
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the
facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow-possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field-actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s)that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
1 December 18, 1996

D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage,put in a
submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals,trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office;
Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call
should include: your name, facility,telephone number, the details of the incident from item
2 above,the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the
spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number - -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES,phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - - , and
local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - - .
2 December 18, 1996

4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off-site damage.
a. Contractors Name: ��-� ��� ��
b. Contractors Address: (� Il'yJl�� - a$D
c. Contractors Phone: 4 3S'
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon(MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name: a n 'f AS��--
b. Phone: a W ra K �g �.�C
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
3 December 18, 1996

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush gutters • Accumulation of solids O Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as
designed
O Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative Decaying vegetation 2f Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems
Feeders • Feed spillage Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
cumulation of decaying wastage
Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7- to 10-
day interval during summer; 15-to 30-day interval
during winter)
AMIC -November 11, 1996, page 1

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products)
O Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed
Animal holding areas • Accumulations of animal V"Elimiriate low areas that trap moisture along fences
wastes and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
turbance by animals is minimal
Q" Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed)
Dry manure handling • Accumulations of animal 0 Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
systems wastes 7- to 10-day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
O Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
O Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613,North Carolina State University, Raleigh,NC 27695-7613.
AMIC -November 11, 1996, page 2

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition Proper disposition of carcasses
11
Standing water • Improper drainage Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities . Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto • Poorly maintained access arm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access
Additional Information: Available From :
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System—Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory; EBAE 209-95 NCSU—BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83 NCSU—BAE
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83 NCSU—BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU—BAE
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
April 18, 2006, page 3

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause Ile BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Dairy production Ff Vegetative or wooded buffers
0""Recommended best management practices
Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn . Wet manure-covered 2r Scrape or flush daily
alley surfaces surfaces C romote drying with proper ventilation
Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas • Urine Promote drying with proper ventilation
• Partial microbial [:KReplace wet or manure-covered bedding
decomposition
Manure dry stacks • Partial microbial Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
decomposition
Storage tank or • Partial microbial MrBottom or mid-level loading
basin surface decomposition 0 Tank covers
Mixing while filling 0 Basin surface mats of solids
• Agitation when emptying 0 Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
�gitate only prior to manure removal
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin • Partial microbial Zf Liquid drainage from settled solids
surfaces decomposition Remove solids regularly
• Mixing while filling
• Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry, or • Agitation when spreading O Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader . Volatile as emissions u �'�'ash residual manure from spreader after use
outlets g ZrProven biological additives or oxidants
April 18, 2006, page 1

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Uncovered manure, . Volatile gas emissions while 0 Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on drying 0 Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces 9_1�Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
011—proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks • Agitation of recycled lagoon 0 Flush tank covers N,14
liquid while tanks are filling O Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti-siphon vents
Outside drain • Agitation during wastewater 0 Box covers A
collection or junction conveyance
boxes
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank 0 Sump tank covers N/A
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at • Agitation during wastewater 0 Extend discharge point of pipes underneath ���
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emission T'Proper lagoon liquid capacity
Biological mixing Correct lagoon startup procedures
Agitation 2r Minimum surface area-to-volume ratio
11� Minimum agitation when pumping
Mechanical aeration
Y'roven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler . High pressure agitation I igate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles • Wind drift ' um recommended operating procedure
;Pump
Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
from second-stage lagoon
m Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
April 18, 2006, page 2

EakerDairyExpansion2018
1/16/2018
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Narrative:
-A maximum of 1000 cows will be milked on the Eaker Dairy Farm. The milk herd will be totally
confined in freestall barns. Lounging areas may be used occasionally. Manure and milking parlor
wash water are stored in three waste storage ponds and dry stack facility for manure solids. Waste
is irrigated or tank hauled on pasture and cropland.
-100 dry cows are pastured and 100 calves are raised off site.
-Runoff from trench silos is diverted into waste storage ponds.
-A revision to the waste management system was completed in July 2008 to accomodate an
increase in the milking herd that provided for 240 days of storage in waste storage ponds 1, 2 and
3. A solids manure storage system was also planned to allow solids to be removed, composted
and re-used for bedding. This system provides 90 days of storage.
-All components were certified as installed on 4/11/2014.
-This waste plan revision was completed on 5/24/2018 and reduces storage in the pond areas from
240 days to 120 days, as provided for in the July 2008 revision to later expand the herd.
-Required and available acreage has increased to accomodate the reduced storage window.
-Copies of calculations provided in the July 30, 2008 revision by Samuel Bingham, NRCS, PE is a
part of this latest waste plan revision since it details the waste structures.
7/31/2019 2:36:05 PM 1/1

IV. Waste Storage Pond #1, #2 and #3
Waste Storage Pond #1 will collect manure and waste
water from the freestall barn, manure separation and solids
storage area. Waste will be transferred by gravity to waste
storage pond U . Transfer pipe control elevation will be
set 1 foot below emergency spillway elevation or 2 . 7 foot
below top of dam elevation.
Waste storage pond #2 will collect manure and waste
water from parlor area . Waste will be transferred by
gravity to waste pond #3 . Transfer pipe control elevation
will be set 1 foot below emergency spillway elevation or 2 . 0
foot below top of dam elevation.
A. Design Volumes
1 . Normal Runoff for 240 day period
NOTE: Normal runoff for 240 day period will used in design
Use average runoff values in Ag. Waste Management Field
Manual for Gaston County. The drainage area consist of silo
area that has flow limited to a notch 4" wide and 2" deep,
the roof of old barn and concrete area between freestall
barns, the vegetated area between barns and pond and the
manure solids separation and storage area.
Drainage Area besides Silo Area = 32, 000 sq ft
Surface = 25, 000 sq ft
Unsurface = 7, 000 sq ft
240 days Surface Runoff Depth = 17 . 77"
Sept - April Unsurface Runoff Depth = 7 . 79"
Surface Runoff= 17 . 77" * 25, 000 sq ft= 37, 021 cu ft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 7 . 79 * 7, 000 sq ft = 4, 544 cu ft
12 in/ft
Silo Area Runoff - It is estimated that most of the normal
runoff will be captured through the concrete notch for
leachate.
Surface Runoff= 17 . 77" * 27, 322 sq ft= 40, 459 cu ft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 7 . 79 * 10, 000 sq ft = 6, 491 cu ft
12 in/ft
Total = 37, 021+4, 544+40, 459+6, 491 = 88, 515 cu ft/240 day

2 : 25 yr - 24 hr runoff from freestalls, etc
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5 . 5
Runoff = 4 . 91"
Note : The 4"x2" orifice for leachate control will reduce
volume of 25 year storm runoff significantly. The volume of
silo area will not be added to the 25 yr-24 hr runoff.
25yr-24hr runoff= 4 . 91" * 32, 000 sq ft = 13, 093 cu ft
12 in/ft
3 . Pond #1 Freeboard + Emergency spillway stage = 1 . 7 ft
4 . Hydraulic Head - 1 foot of head is required to force
water into the transfer pipe .
5 . Waste Volumes
Waste Volume from pond #1
400 milk cows are in freestall barns 900 of time and
85% of the manure collected is stored in waste pond. The
literature on solid separators indicates a wide range of
values for total solids removal. A conservative approach
will taken in the design of the waste storage ponds . A
lower solids removal rate of 15% will be used in design of
waste storage ponds for liquid.
Volume = 400 cows * 14 gal/day/cow * 240 days * 900 *850
7 . 48 gal/cu ft
= 137, 455 cu ft
Waste Volume from milk parlor
400 milk cows are in milking parlor 100 of time.
Volume = 400 cows * 14 gal/day/cow * 240 days * 100
7 . 48 gal/cu ft
= 17, 968 cu ft
100 dry cows are on lot 500 of time.
Volume = 100 dry cows * 14 gal/day/cow * 240 days * 500
7 . 48 gal/cu ft
= 22, 460 cu ft
Total= 137, 455 cu ft + 17, 968 + 22, 460 = 177, 883 cu ft

6 . Normal Runoff for 240 day period for Parlor Area
Use average runoff values in Ag. Waste Management Field
Manual for Gaston County.
Drainage Area = 30, 000 sq ft Surface = 10, 000 sq ft
Unsurface = 20, 000 sq ft
Try 240 days Surface Runoff Depth = 17 . 77"
Sept-April Unsurface Runoff Depth = 7 . 79"
Surface Runoff= 17 . 77" * 10, 000 sq ft= 14, 808 cu ft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 7 . 79 * 20, 000 sq ft = 12, 983 cu ft
12 in/ft
Total = 14, 808 + 12, 983 = 27, 791 cu ft
7 . Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface #2
30 . 2 - 19. 1 = 11 . 1" = 0 . 9 ft/240 days
Volume = 0 . 91 x 84' x84' = 6, 350 cu ft
8 : Rainfall minus evaporation from pond #1
30 . 2 - 19 . 1 = 11 . 1" = 0 . 9 ft/240 days
Volume = 0. 9' x 213' x 70' = 13, 419 cu ft
9 . 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface #2
Rainfall = 5 . 5" = . 5 ft
Volume = 0 . 5 x 84' x84' = 3, 528 cu ft
10 . 25 yr - 24 hr runoff from parlor area
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5 . 5
Runoff = 4 . 91"
25yr-24hr runoff= 4 . 91" * 30, 000 sq ft = 12, 275 cu ft
12 in/ft
11 . Waste Pond #3 Freeboard + ESW stage = 1 . 0 ft
12 . Parlor Water
400 cows x 5 gal/cow/day x 240 days/7 . 48 gal/cu ft
= 64, 171 cu ft

13 . Hydraulic Head - 1 foot of head is required to force
water into the transfer pipe for pond #2
14 . 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface #1
Volume = 0 . 5' x 213' x 70' = 7, 455 cu ft
15 . Waste Pond #2 freeboard + ESW stage - 1 . 0
16. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond #3
30 . 2 - 19 . 1 = 11 . 1" = 0 . 9 ft/240 days
17 . 25 yr - 24 hr rainfall on pond surface #3
Rainfall = 5 . 5" _ . 5 ft
B. Summary of Design Volumes
1 . Waste Volume 177, 883 cu ft
2 . Normal Runoff, Parlor Area 27, 791 cu ft
3 . Normal Runoff from freestall, etc 88, 515 cu ft
4 . R-E from Pond #2 6, 350 cu ft
5 . R-E from Pond #1 13, 419 cu ft
6.. 25 yr direct rainfall from pond 2 3, 528 cu ft
7 . 25 yr runoff from Parlor Area 12, 275 cu ft
8 . 25 yr direct rainfall from pond 1 7, 455 cu ft
9 . 25 yr runoff from Freestall Area 13, 093 cu ft
10 . Parlor Water 64, 171 cu ft
TOTAL 414, 480 cu ft
Pond #1 Direct
11 . Hydraulic Head for Pipe Transfer 1 . 0 ft
12 . Freeboard + Emergency Spillway Stage 1 . 7 ft
TOTAL 2 . 7 ft
Pond #2 Direct
13 . Hydraulic Head for Pipe Transfer 1 . 0 ft
14 . Freeboard + Emergency Spillway Stage 1 . 0 ft
2 . 0 ft
Pond #3 Direct
15 . Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface 0 . 9 ft
16 . 25 yr- 24 hr rainfall on pond surface 0 . 5 ft
17 . Freeboard + Emergency Spillway Stage 1 . 0 ft
TOTAL 2 . 4 ft

8 months storage available in Ponds #1, #2 and #3
Normal Pump-Out Volume
177, 883 + 27, 791 + 88, 515 + 6, 350 + 13, 419 + 64, 171
+. 9x296x186
= 427, 679 cu ft per 240 days
= 650, 429 cu ft per 365 days
= 179 ac-in per year
= 4, 865, 000 gallons per year
Maximum pump out level
0 . 5 ' + 1 . 0 ' + (3, 528 + 12, 275 + 7, 455 + 13, 093) / (290' xl80' )
= 2 . 2'
D. Pump-Out Elevation and ESW Elevation
The waste storage pond for runoff should be hauled or
irrigated before the water level reaches the 25 yr - 24 hr
storage volume. This elevation is 2 . 2 ft below the top of
dam. The emergency spillway elevation is planned 1 . 0 foot
below the top of dam.
V. Solids Manure Storage
Manure slurry will be collected in collection pit at
freestall barn.
400 milk cows are typically in freestall barns 900 of
time. The rest of manure is collected at the milk parlor.
Manure in barns is scraped to collection pit . Of the volume
collected, it is estimated that volume removed will between
the following estimates .
1 . 150 of the manure volume excreted by dairy cow will be
separated with solids manure separator.
Volume 1 = 15% x 14 gal/day/7 . 48 gal/cu ft
_ . 28 cu ft/day/cow
2 . From "Special Report 945, Analysis of Separated Manure
Solids from Selected Manure Separators in Wlllamette
Valley, Oregon, Dairy Facilities" Note: The report
indicated a variability of 50o in measurements between
farms .
Volume 2 = 0 . 6 cu ft/day/cow @ 36 lbs/cu ft (wet)
Volume 1 = 400 cows x 14 gal/day/cow x 90o x 15% x 90 days
7 . 48 gal/cu ft
= 9, 096 cu ft/90 days
36, 889 cu ft/365 days
Volume 2 = 400 cows x 0 . 6 cu ft/cow/day x 90 days
= 21, 600 cu ft/90 days
= 87, 600 cu ft/365 days

C. Sizing Waste Storage Ponds #1, #2 & #3
Waste Storage Pond #1 behind freestall barns
213' x 70'
2 . 7'
2 : 2X : 1
2 : 1 7 . 3' 2 : 1
1
173' x 30'
Volume = 7 . 3/6 [173 x 30 + 202 . 2 x 59 . 2 + 4 (187 . 6 x 44 . 6) ]
= 61, 597 cu ft
Waste Storage Pond #2 behind Parlor
84' x 84'
2 . 0'
2 : 1 :—9. 0' 2 : 1
4 0' x 4 0'
Volume = 9. 0/6 [40 x 40 + 76 x 76 + 4 (58 x 58) ]
= 31, 248 cu ft
Sizing Waste Pond #3
296' x 186'
2 . 4'
3 : 1 8 . 6' 3 : 1
230' x 120'
Volume = 8 . 6/6 [230 x 120 + 281 . 6 x 171 . 6 + 4 (255 . 8 x 145 . 8) ]
= 335, 850 cu ft
Design Volume all Ponds = 61, 597 + 31, 248 + 335, 850
= 428, 695 cu ft

A 40' x67' concrete heavy use area is planned for manure
solids separator, temporary storage and work area.
Storage volume on concrete heavy use area = 6x25x63
= 9, 450 cu ft
A roofed storage facility next to separator will be
installed to store solids removed from waste stream.
Dry Stack Volume - 5' x38' -7"x64' = 12, 347 cu ft
Total Solids Storage Volume = 9, 450 +_ 12, 347 cu ft
21, 797 cu ft
Front end loader will be used to move solids to compost
facility. Volume will be land applied or used in freestall
barn for bedding. The temporary storage area and roofed
storage area are designed to store 90 days of storage . Mr.
Eaker will manage the storage area to compost solids. A
primary composting will occur in temporary storage area at
solids separator. Secondary composting is planned under
roofed storage area. A final compost finishing will also
occur in roofed storage area by turning compost after 30
days or so.
A pump in pump pit at end of gravity channel will be used to
transfer manure to FAN separator. The pit is sized large
enough to store 2 days plus of manure slurry.
Volume = 400 cows x 14 gal/day x 2 days x 900
7 . 48 gal/cu ft
= 1, 348 cu ft
Pit Size = 8' x 14' x 14' = 1, 568 cu ft OK
Overflow from pump pit will go into waste storage pond #1 .
VI . Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
Clean water diversions will be maintained around waste
storage ponds . The District Conservationist will design all
diversions. Diversions shall be designed to carry the 25
year - 24 hour runoff plus capacity to store some sediment .
B. Guttering
Clean water shall be excluded to the fullest extent
possible by guttering. Any new roof runoff into feedlot
area will be guttered.

�' s yr'A c} •
„y4
VWn
r 5
ROY COOPER
Governor � APR 10 2019
MICHAEL S.REGAN
Secretary 'Ne°".�r� Wat+erouauty
LINDA CULPEPPER NORTH CAROL]NA Reg nsI0p61gUMS®Cft
Director Environmental Quality
February 26,2019
Eaker Dairy Inc
Eaker Dairy,Inc.
610 Roy Eaker Rd
Cherryville,NC 28021
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring State General Permit
Dear Permittee:
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation State Non-Discharge General Permits,
which expire on September 30, 2019. Copies of the new animal waste operation State Non-Discharge General Permits are available
at https://deg.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/WateNualii%-regional-operations/afo or by writing or calling:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number:[phone]
In order to assure your continued coverage under the State Non-Discharge General Permits, you must submit an application for
permit coverage to the Division. Enclosed you will find a "Request for Certificate of Coverage Facilit,, Currently Covered by an
Expiring State Non-Discharge General Permit." The a s�lication form must be completed, signed and returned b} April 3. 2019.
Please note that sou must include one (1) copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan tCAWMPI with the
completed and signed application form. A list of items included in the CAWMP can be found on page 2 of the renewal
al)L4kation form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to$25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the State Non-Discharge General Permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feel
free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Branch staff at 919-707-9100.
Sincerely,
Jon Risgaard,Section Chief
Animal Feeding Operations and Groundwater Section
Enclosures
cc(w/o enclosures): Mooresville Regional Office,Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Gaston County Soil and Water Conservation District
AFOG Section Central Files-AWC360004
North Cerol as Department of Enviroar.enta7 Qva1Ky I Dlvis;�n of 1Sfiter Resources
51.2 W—0-11sbury St-V 1ESS Vail Servfm Center I Rs,e'gh,North CsreEna 276se-leas
e13.7C72WO

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Animal Waste Management Systems
Request for Certification of Coverage
Facility Currently covered by an Expiring Sate Non-Discharge General Permit
On September 30, 2019, the North Carolina State Non-Discharge General Permits for Animal Waste Management Systems will
expire. As required by these permits, facilities that have been issued Certificates of Coverage to operate under these State
Non-Discharge General Permits must apply for renewal at least 180 days prior to their expiration date. Therefore, all applications
must be received by the Division of Water Resources by no later than April 3,2019.
Please do not leave any question unanswered. Please verify all information and make any necessary corrections below.
Application must be signed and dated by the Permittee.
1. Farm Number: 36-0004 Certificate Of Coverage Number: AWC360004
2. Facility Name: Eaker Dairy,Inc.
3. Landowner's Name(same as on the Waste Management Plan): Eaker Dairy Inc
4. Landowner's Mailing Address: 610 Ro% Eaker Rd
City: Chem ville State: NC Zip: 28021
Telephone Number: 704-435-6231 Ext. E-mail:
5. Facility's Physical Address: 610 Roy Faker Rd
City: Cherrvville State: NC Zip: 280218207
6. County where Facility is located: Gaston
7. Farm Manager's Name(if different from Landowner):
g, Farm Manager's telephone number(include area code):
9. Integrator's Name(if there is not an Integrator,write"None"):
10. Operator Name(OIC): Cameron R.Eaker Phone No.: 704-435-6231 OIC#: 20943
11. Lessee's Name(if there is not a Lessee,write"None"):
12. Indicate animal operation type and number:
Current Permit: Operations Type Allowable Count
Cattle-Dairy Calf 5�9_
Cattle-Dry Cow J.99-
Cattle-Milk Cow 4.90 1660
Operation Types:
Swine Cattle Dry Poultry Other Types
Wean to Finish Dairy Calf Non Laying Chickens Horses-Horses
Wean to Feeder Dairy Heifer Laying Chickens Horses-Other
Farrow to Finish Milk Cow Pullets Sheep-Sheep
Feeder to Finish Dry Cow Turkeys Sheep-Other
Farrow to Wean Beef Stocker Calf Turkey Pullet
Farrow to Feeder Beef Feeder
Boar/Stud Beef Broad Cow _Wet Poultry
Gilts Other Non Laying Pullet
Other Layers

13. Waste Treatment and Storage Lagoons (Verify the following information is accurate and complete. Make all necessary
corrections and provide missing data.)
Design
Estimated Liner Type Estimated Freeboard
Structure Date (Clay,Synthetic, Capacity Surface Area "Redline"
Name Built Unknown) (Cubic Feet) (Square Feet) (Inches)
LIQUID C 'l �� j ! a D.ql7
PUSH-OFF G L 8 7 O -M-00-Ia,6 G
' O !3 CIA ?j j
--T
Mail one (1) copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with this completed and signed application
as required by NC General Statutes 143-215.10C(d)to the address below.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
1. The most recent Waste Utilization Plan(WUP),signed bv the owner and a certified technical specialist,containing:
a. The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields(e.g.irrigation,injection,etc.)
b. A map of every field used for land application(for example:irrigation map)
a The soil series present on every land application field
d. The crops grown on every land application field
e. The Realistic Yield Expectation(RYE)for every crop shown in the WUP
£ The maximum PAN to be applied to every land application field
g. The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
h. The required NRCS Standard specifications
2. A site map/schematic
3. Emergency Action Plan
4. Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
5. Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
6. Mortality Control Checklist with selected method noted-Use the enclosed updated Mortality Control Checklist
7. Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.) Please be sure the above table is accurate and
complete. Also provide any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to
your facility.
8. Operation and Maintenance Plan
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal.
(e.g.composting,digesters,waste transfers,etc.)
As a second option to mailing paper copies of the application package, you can scan and email one signed copy of the
application and all the CAWMP items above to: [e-mail]
AhR 10 2019
wwawouality
R@&n810P@radoW5udM

I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that,
if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not
included,this application package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A 'and 443-215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false statement,
representation, or certification in any application may be subject to civil penalties,'up to $25,000 per violation. (18 U.S.C.
Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both for
a similar offense.)
Printed Name of Signing Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all landowners should sign. If Landowner is a
corporation,signature should be by a principal executive officer of the corporation):
i fir- �j
Name: - 1 e 'Gn A/ ff Title: —J�l 5 9 K
� q
Signature: 04 - Date:
Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number:[phone]
E-mail:2019Pe rm [e-mail]
FORM: RENEWAL-STATE GENERAL 02/2019

Version—November 26,2018
Mortality Management Methods
Indicate which method(s) will be implemented.
When selecting multiple methods indicate a primary versus secondary option.
Methods other than those listed must be approved by the State Veterinarian.
Primary Secondary Routine Mortality
D Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours of knowledge of animal
death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water
(G.S.106-403). The bottom of the burial pit should be at least one foot above the seasonal
high water table.Attach burial location map and plan.
Landfill at municipal solid waste facility permitted by NC DEQ under GS 15A NCAC
U 13B .0200.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7.
® Complete incineration according to 02 NCAC 52C .0102
Q ® A composting system approved and permitted ay the NC Department of Agriculture&Con-
sumer Services Veterinary Division (attach copy of permit). If compost is distributed off-farm,
additional requirements must be met and a permit is required from NC DEQ.
® In the case of dead poultry;only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the
NC Department of Agriculture&Consumer Services(G.S. 106-549.70).
�1 Any method which, in the professional opinion�of the State Veterinarian, would.make possible
L,J the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health.
(Written approval by the State Veterinarian must be attached).
® Mass Mortality Plan
Mass mortality plans are required for farms covered by an NPDES permit. These plans are
also recommended for all animal operations. This plan outlines farm-specific mortality man-
agement methods to be used for mass mortality. The NCDA&CS Veterinary Division sup-
ports a variety of emergency mortality disposal options; contact the Division for guidance.
• A catastrophic mortality disposal plan is part of the facility's CAWMP and is activated
when numbers of dead animals exceed normal mortality rates as specified by the State
Veterinarian:
• Burial must be-done in accordance with NC General Statutes and NCDA&CS Veterinary
Division regulations and guidance.
• Mass burial sites are subject to additional permit conditions(refer to facility's animal
waste management system permit).
• In the event of imminent threat of a disease emergency,the State Veterinarian may enact
additional temporary procedures or measures for disposal according to G.S. 106-399.4.
L Lf f4-- g/3//�
Signature Oarm Owner/Manager Date
_ L1 3 rq
L— ignature of Te.hnical Specialist ate

EakerDairyExpansion2l)18
1/16/2018
This plan has been prepared for: This plan has been developed by:
Eaker Dairy Gaston Soil and Water Conservation
Cameron Rusty Eaker District
610 Roy Eaker Rd Clifford Parker Jr
Cherryville, NC 28021-8207 1303 Dallas Chenyville Hwy
704-435-6231 Dallas, NC 28034
704-922-4181
eloper Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
1(we)understand and agree to the specifications and operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above.I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
b�
Signature(owner) Date
Signature(manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S.Department of Agriculture-
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservatiori Commission.
Plan Approved By:
4,c.hnical5pecialist Signature Date

Sources in Plan
EakerDairyExpansion2018
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
S 8 Dairy(Milk Cow)Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 7,749,000 gals/year by a 1,000 Dairy(Milk
Cow)Liquid Manure Slurry operation.This production facility has waste storage capacities of
approximately 120 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Injected 77,630
Incorporated-4 wks or less 77,630
following application
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos 51,753
following application
Broadcast 51,753
I rrigated 51,753
Max.Available Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Volume Volume Surplus/Deficit
PAN(Ibs) Applied(Ibs) Deficit(Ibs) Applied(Gallons) (Gallons)
Year 1 51,753 51,702 51 7,741,324 7,676
1/25/2018 4:41:07 PM 1 /1

Planned Crops Summary
EakerDairyExpansion201
0
The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in the plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
and Plant Available Nitrogen(PAN) recommendations are also provided for each crop as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate.
The Leaching Index(LI)and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool(PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field,where
available.
If a filed's PLAT Rating is High,any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with
North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the
following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Tract Field Total Wettable SMU LI Crop Name RYE Recom- PLAT_ P205(lbs/acre)
Acres Acres mended Rating Crop
PAN Removal Applied
230 1 1 42.08 42.081 CeB2 15
Com,Silage 21.9 Tons 239 Low 74 NA
Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 115 Low 56 NA
230 2 16.41 16.41 CeB2 15
Com,Silage 21.9 Tons 239 Low 74 NA
Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 115 Low 56 NA
230 3 7.7 7.7 CeB2 15
Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 158 Low 8 NA
230 4 i 47.25 47.25 PaD2 15
Com,Silage 16 Tons 174 Lowl 54 NA
Small Grain,Silage 7.2 Tons 80 Low 39 NA
230 5 25.371 25.37 CeB2 15
Com,Silage 21.9 Tons 239 Low 74 NA
Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 115 Lowl 56 NA
239— 1 1 6.62 4.91 PaD2 15
Com,Silage 16 Tons 174 Low 54 NA
Small Grain,Silage 17.2 Tons' 801 Low 39 NA
240 1 11.07 9.5 CoA I 15
Com,Silage 28 Tons 305 Medium 95 NA
Small Grain,Silage 10 Tons 111 Medium 54 NA
240 1Rye 11.07 9.5 CoA 15
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-4/7 Harvest 0 Tons 100 Medium Ol NA'
240 1AIf 11.07 9.5 COA! 15
Mixed Cool Season Grass-Hay l 3.5 Tons1� 154 Medium 50� NA'
1 5/23/2018 3:21:24 PM 1/5

Planned Crops Summary
EakerDairyExpanslon201
240 2 29.7 27.1 LdB2 10
Corn,Silage 21.6 Tons Medium 73 NA
Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 109 Medium 53 NA
240 211ye 29.7 27.1 LdD2 10
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-4f7 Harvest 0 Tons 100 Medium 1 0 NA
240 2AIf 1 29.7 27-1 LgB 10
Mixed Cool Season Grass-Hay 3.2 Tons 138 Medium 45 NA
240 31 14.3 13 PaD2 15
Com,Silage 16 Tons 174 Low 54 NA
Small Grain,Silage 7.2 Tons 80 Low 1 39 NA
240 3Rye 14.3 13 PaD2 15
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-4f7 Harvest 0 Tons` 100 Lowl 0 NA
240 3AIf 1 14.3 131 PaD2 15
Mixed Cool Season Grass-Hay 2.6 Tons 1141 Low 37 NA
240 4 2.1 2.1 LdB2 10
Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 162 Low 8 NA
240 4Rye 1 2.1 2.11 LdD2 10
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-4I7 Harvest 0 Tons 100 Low 0 NA
240 4AIf 1 2.1 2.1 Lg6 10
Mixed Cool Season Grass-Hay 3.2 Tons 138 Low 45 NA
241 4 7.5 7.5� VaB 10
Com,Silage 17.1 Tons 186 Low 58 NA
Small Grain,Silage 7.6 Tons 84 Low 41 NA
241 4rye 7.5 7.5 VaB 10
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-4!1 Harvest 0 Tons 100 Low 0 NA
241 4alf 7.5 7.5 VaB 10
Mixed Cool Season Grass-Hay 3.1 Tons 136 Lowl 44 NAi
241 5 15.6 15.6 Ap6 15
Com,Silage 24.5 Tons 267 Low 83 NA
Small Grain,Silage 11.3 Tons 125 Low 61 NA
241 L 5rye I 15.6 15.6 Ap6 15
CereaVAnnual Rye O/S, Hay-4f7 Harvest 0 Tons 100 Low 0 NA
241 5alf 15.6 15.6 ApB 15
Mixed Cool Season Grass-Hay 3.9 Tons 172 Low 55 NA
241 6 7 7 ChA 10
Com,Silage 22.5Tons� 234 Low 77 NA
5123/2018 3:21:24 PM 2/5

Planned Crops Summary
EakerDairyExpansion2O1
Small Grain,Silage 9 Tons 95 Low 49 NA
241 6rye 7 71 ChA 10
Cereal/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-l7 Harvest 0 Tons 100 Low 0 NA
241 1 half 7 7 ChA 10
Mixed Cool Season Grass-Hay 3.2 Tons 134 Low 45 NA
244 1 29.3 24.181 CeB2 15
Com,Silage 21.9 Tons 239 Medium 74 NA
Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 115 Medium 56 NA
2," 1 rye 29.3 24.18 CeB2 15
Cereat/Annual Rye O/S, Hay-4l7 Harvest 0 Tons 100 Low 0 NA
2324- 1 7.01 6 PeB2 10
Com,Silage 19 Tons Low 65 NA
Small Grain,Silage 8.6 Tons 95 Low 46 NA
2324- 2 24.93 23 PeB2 10
Com,Silage 19 Tons Low 65 NA
Small Grain,Silage 8.6 Tons 95 Low 46 NA
3078A I 3 13.2 13.2 CeB2 15
Com,Silage 21.9 Tons Low 74 NA
Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 115 Lowl 56 NA
3078A 4 39.03 39.03 CeB2 15
Com,Silage I 21.9 Tons I 239 Low 74 NA
3078A 5 1.63 1.63 CeB2 15
Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 158 Low 8 NA
3078A 6 1.51 1.51 CeD2 15
Fescue Pasture 4 Tons 132 Low 6 NA
3078A 7 2.96 2.96 CeB2 1 15
Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 211 Low 75 NA
3078A 1 81 18.3 18.3 CeB2 15I
Com,Silage 21.9 Tons 239 Low 74 NA
3078A 9 18.59 18.59 CeB2 15
Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 158 Low 8 NA
3078A 10 16.94 16.94 CeB21 15
Com,Silage 21.9 Tons 239 Low 74 NA
3078A 11 13.43 13.43 CeB2 15
Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 158 Low 8 NA
3078A 12 2.45L 2.45 CeB2 15
5/23/2018 3:21:24 PM 3/5

Planned Crops Summary
EakerDairyExpansion201
[Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 158 Low 81 NA
3078A 1 13 12.321. 12.321 CeB2 15 _
Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 158 Low 8 NA
3078A 14 32.03 32.03 CeB2 15
Com,Silage 21.9 Tons 239 Law 74 NA
3078A 15 2.47 2471 CeB2 15
Fescue Hay 4.8 Tons 211 Law 75 NA
3078A 16 40.82 40.82 CeB2 15
Wheat,Grain 57 Bushels Low 28 NA
Sorghum,Grain 57 CWT 98 Low 43 NA
3078A 17 8.83 8.83 CeB2 15
Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 158 Low 8 NA
3078A 181 8.97 8.97 CeB2 15
Fescue Pasture I 4.8 Tons 158 Low 8 NA
3078A 19 9.06 9.06 CeB2 15
Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 158 Low 8 NA
3078A 20 2.25 2.25 CeB2 15
Fescue Pasture 4.8 Tons 158 Low 8 NA
3707 5 3.76 3.76' Ld62 10
Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 162 Low 8 NA
3881 2 1.09 1.09 PaD2 15
Fescue Pasture 3.6 Tons 119 Low 6 NA
3881 3 8.24 8.24 HeB 10
Fescue Pasture 3.9 Tons 126 Low 6 NA
3881 6 15.61 15.61 HeB 10
Fescue Pasture 3.9 Tons 126 Low 6 NA
3881 8 6.85 6.85 He 10
Fescue Pasture I 3.9 Tons 126 Low 6 NA
3882 24 3.72 3.72 Ld82 10
Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons' 1621 Low 8 NA
Totals: 781.84 750.53
Notes:1.In the tract column,-symbol means leased,otherwise,owned.
5/23/2018 3:21:24 PM 4/5

Planned Crops Summary
EakerDairyExpansion201
L/ Potential Leaching Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble nutrient None
<2 leaching below the root zone.
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble nutrient Nutrient Management(590)should be planned.
>=2&<=10 leaching below the root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble nutrient Nutrient Management(590)should be planned. Other conservation
leaching below the root zone. practices that improve available water holding capacity of soil and
improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples are
> 10 Cover Crops(340)to scavenge nutrients, Sod-Based Rotations(328),
Long-Term No-Till(778),and edge-of-field practices such as Filter
Strips(393)and Riparian Forest Buffers(391).
P Loss Index Rating P Management Recommendation
0-25 Low No adjustment needed; N based application
26-50 Medium No adjustment needed; N based application
51 - 100 High Application limited to crop P removal
> 100 Very High Starter P application only
5/23/2018 3:21:24 PM 5/5

Waste Utilization Table
EakerDairyExpansion2018
The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure
or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each
field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure
applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table Year 1
I
Nitrogen I Comm. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. Res. PA Manure Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient (Ibs/A) Nutrient Applied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied Applied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(IbslA) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A)
Field Source Total Wettable Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract ID ID ID I SMU I Acreage Acreage I Crop Name RYE 1 Period N N N Method N gaUA I tons 1000 gals tons
230 1 S 8 CeB2 42.08 42.08 Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 2/15-6/30 239 141 0 Broad. 98 14.67 0 617.09 0
230 1 S 8 CeB2 42.08 42.08 Small Grain,Silage 10A Tons 9/1-3/31 115 115 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
230 2 S 8 CeB2 16.41 16.41 Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 2/15-6/30 239 139 0 Broad. 100 14.96 0 245.56 0
230 2 S 8 CeB2 16.41 16.41 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 9/1-3/31 115 0 0 Broad. 0 17.21 0 282.39 0
230 4 S 8 PaD2 47.25 47.25 Corn,Silage 16 Tons 2/15-6/30 174 74 0 Broad. 100 14.96 0 707.05 0
230 4 S 8 PaD2 47.25 47.25 Small Grain,Silage 7.2 Tons 911-3/31 80 0 0 Broad. 0 11.97 0 565.64 0
230 5 S 8 CeB2 25.37 25.37 Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 2/15-6/30 239 109 0 Broad. 130 19.45 1 0 493.53 0
230 5 S 8 CeB2 25.37 25.37 Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 9/1-3/31 115 0 0 Broad. 0 17.21 0 436.58 0
239- 1 S 8 PaD2 6.62 4.90 Corn,Silage 16 Tons 2/15-6/30 174 0 0 Broad. 174 26.04 0 127.58 0
239- 1 S 8 PaD2 6,62 4.90 Small Grain,Silage 7.2 Tons 9/1-3/31 80 0 0 Broad. 0 11.97 0 58.66 0
240 1 S 8 CoA 11.07 9.50 Corn,Silage 28 Tons 2/15-6130 305 0 0 Irrig. 305 45.64 1 0 433.58 0,
240 1 S 8 CoA 11.07 9.50 Small Grain,Silage 10 Tons 9/1-3/31 111 0 0 Irrig. 0 16.61 0 157.80 0
1/25/2018 4:42:08 PM 1 /2

Waste Utilization Table
EakerDairyExpansion2018
240 2 S 8 LdB2 29.70 27.10 Small Grain,Silage 9.8 Tons 9/1-3/31 109 0 0 Irrig. 109 16.31 0 442.02 0
240 3 68 PaD2 14.30 13,00 Corn,Silage 16 Tons 2/15-6/30 174 0 0 Irrig. 174 26.04 0 338.49 0
240 3 S 8 PaD2 14.30 13,00 Small Grain,Silage 7.2 Tons 9/1-3/31 80 0 0 Broad. 0 11.97 0 155.63 0
240 4 S B LdB2 2.10 2.10 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 811-7/31 162 162 0 1 Broad. 162 24.24 0 50.91 0
241 4 S B VaB 7.50 7.50 Corn,Silage 17.1 Tons 2/15-6/30 186 106 0 Broad. 80 11.97 0 89.78 0
241 5 S 8 ApB 15.60 15.60 Corn,Silage 24.5 Tons 2/15-6/30 267 187 0 Broad. 80 11.97 0 186.75 0
241 5 S 8 ApB 15.60 15.60 Small Grain,Silage 11.3 Tons 9/1-3/31 125 0 0 Broad. 0 18.71 0 291.80 0
244 1 S 8 CeB2 29.30 24.18 Corn,Silage 21.9 Tons 2/15-6/30 239 0 0 1 Irrig. 239 35.76 0 864.78 0
244 1 S 8 CeB2 29.30 24.1 E Small Grain,Silage 10.4 Tons 9/1-3/31 115 0 0 Irrig. 0 17.21 0 416.11 0
3707 5 S 8 LdB2 3.76 3.76 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 162 0 0 Broad. 162 24.24 0 91.15 0
3881 2 SS PaD2 1.09 1.09 1 Fescue Pasture 3.6 Tons 8/1-7/31 1 119 0 0 Broad. 119 17.81 0 19.41 0
3881 3 S 8 HeB 8.24 8.24 Fescue Pasture 3.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 126 0 0 Broad. 126 18.86 0 155.36 0
3881 6 S 8 HeB 15.51 15.61 Fescue Pasture 3.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 126 0 0 Broad. 126 18.86 0 294.32 0
3881 8 1 S 8 HeB 1 6.85 6.85 Fescue Pasture 3.9 Tons 8/1-7/31 126 0 0 Broad. 128 18.86 0 129.16 0
3882 24 1 S 8 LdB2 1 3.72 3.72 Fescue Pasture 4.9 Tons 8/1-7131 162 1 0 0 1 Broad. 162 24.241, 0 90.18 0
Total Applied, 1000 gallons 7,741.32
Total Produced, 1000 gallons 7,749.00
Balance, 1000 gallons 7.68
Total Applied,tons 0.00
Total Produced,tons 0.00
Balance,tons 0.00
Notes: 1.In the tract column,--symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 1.Symbol`means user entered data.
1/25/2018 4:42:08 PM 2/2

Required Soil Test Values
EakerDairyExpansion2018
The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that
should be taken based off information provided at time of soil tests. Fields that receive manure must have a soil
analysis conducted at least once every three years. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant
growth.Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels.
Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in Ibs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071,
respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc,
we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices,this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop
based on the first crop listed on the most recent soil sample.Application of lime at recommended rates is
necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production. If the first crop or rotation changes, these
recommendations may need to be reevaluated to ensure optimal ranges ofr crop production are maintained.
Tract ID Field ID Crops) pH Lime Recom. Cu4 Copper Zn-1 Zinc
for Crop(s) Recommendation Recommendation
(tons/acre)
230 1 Cam silage,Cam silage 6 0,0 107 0.0 108 0,0 1
230 2 Corn silage,Cam silage 5.7 0,0 63 0,0 79 0,0
230 3 Cam silage,Cam silage 5.5 0.9,0 75 0,0 84 0,0
230 4 Cam silage,Cam silage 5.5 0.9,0 77 0,0 79 0,0
230 5 Cam silage,Cam silage 5.5 0.9,0 75 0,0 84 0,0
239 1 Small Grain(SG),Cam silage 5.5 0.7,0 72 0.0 180 0,0
240 1 Small Grain(SG),Cam silage 5.6 0.8,0 187 0,0 442 0.0
240 1AIf Small Grain(SG),Cam silage 5.6 0.8,0 187 0,0 442 0,0
240 1Rye Small Grain(SG),Cam silage 5.6 0.8,0 187 0,0 442 0,0
240 2 Small Grain(SG),Corn silage 5.6 0.8,0 187 0,0 442 0.0
240 2AIf Small Grain(SG),Cam silage 5.6 0.8,0 1 187 0,0 442 0,0
240 2Rye Small Grain(SG),Cam silage 5.6 0.8,0 187 0,0 442 0,0
240 3 Small Grain(SG),Cam silage 5.6 0.8,0 187 0,0 442 0,0
240 Ulf Small Grain(SG),Cam silage 5.6 0.8,0 187 0,0 442 0,0
240 3Rye Small Grain(SG),Cam silage 5.6 0.8,0 187 0,0 442 0.0
240 4 Small Grain(SG),Cam silage 5.6 0.8,0 187 0,0 442 0.0
240 4Alf Small Grain(SG),Cam silage 5.6 0.8,0 187 0,0 442 0,0
240 14Rye Small Grain(SG),Com silage 5.6 0.8,0 187 0;0 442 0,0
241 4 Small Grain(SG),Alfalfa M 5 2,0 48 0,0 145 0,0
241 4alf Small Grain(SG),Alfalfa M 5 2,0 48 0,0 145 0,0
241 4rye Small Grain(SG),Alfalfa M 5 2,0 48 0,0 145 0,0
5/23/2018 3:23:23 PM 1/3

Required Soil Test Values
EakerDairyExpansion2018
241 5 Small Grain(SG),Alfalfa M 5 2,0 48 0,0 145 0,0
241 5alf Small Grain(SG),Alfalfa M 5 2,0 48 0,0 145 0,0
241 5rye Small Grain(SG),Alfalfa M 5 2,0 48 0,0 145 0,0
241 6 Small Grain(SG),Alfalfa M 5 2,0 48 0,0 145 0,0
241 6alf Small Grain(SG),Alfalfa M 5 2,0 48 0,0 145 0,0
241 6rye Small Grain(SG),Alfalfa M 5 2,0 48 0,0 145 0,0
244 1rye Small Grain(SG),Alfalfa M 5 2,0 48 0.0 145 0,0
244 1 Small Grain(SG),Corn silage 5.9 0.0 184 0,0 648 0,0
2324 1 Small Grain(SG),Com silage 5.1 1.1,0 64 0,0 202 0,0
2324 2 Small Grain(SG),Corn silage 5.1 1.1,0 64 0.0 202 0,0
3078A 3 5.3 0,0 52 0.0 95 0,0
3078A 4 5.3 0,0 52 0.0 95 0,0
3078A 5 5.3 0,0 52 0,0 95 0,0
3078A 6 5.3 0,0 52 .0,0 95 0,0
3078A 7 5.3 0,0 52 0,0 95 0,0
3078A 8 5.3 0,0 52 0,0 95 0,0
3078A 9 5.3 0,0 52 0,0 95 0,0
3078A 10 5.3 0.0 52 0,0 1 95 0,0
3078A 11 5.3 0,0 52 0,0 95 0,0
3078A 12 5.3 0,0 52 (),0 05 0,0
3078A 13 5.3 0.0 52 0,0 95 0,0
3078A 14 5.3 0,0 52 0,0 95 0,0
3078A 15 5.3 0,0 52 0,0 95 0,0
3078A 16 5.3 0,0 52 0,0 95 0,0
3078A 17 5.3 0,0 52 0,0 95 0.0
3078A 18 5.3 0,0 52 0,0 95 0,0
3078A 19 5.3 0,0 52 0,0 95 0,0
3078A 20 5.3 0.0 52 0,0 95 0,0
3707 5 Small Grain(SG),Alfalfa M 5 2.2,0 37 0,0 73 0,0
3881 2 Small Grain(SG),Alfalfa M 5 2.2,0 37 0,0 73 0,0
3881 3 Small Grain(SG),Alfalfa M 5 2.2,0 37 0.0 73 0.0
5/23/2018 3:23:23 PM 2/3

Required Soil Test Values
EakerDairyExpansion2018
3881 6 Small Grain(SG),Alfalfa M 5 2.2,0 37 0,0 73 0,0
3881 8 Small Grain(SG),Alfalfa M 5 2.2,0 37 0,0 73 0,0
3882 24 Small Grain(SG),Alfalfa M 5 2.2,0 37 0,0 73 0,0
Zinc and Copper Toxicity Levels in Soils
Metal Soil Test Index Recommended Action
Zn 300 Limit application on peanuts.Maintain soil pH>=6.0.
500 Cease application on peanut land.Maintain soil pH>=6.0.
2000 Caution:seek alternative site(all crops).Maintain soil pH>=6.0.
3000 Cease application(all crops).Maintain soil pH>=6.0.
Cu 2000 Caution:seek alternative site(all crops).Maintain soil pH>=6.0_
3000 Cease application(all crops).Maintain soil pH>=6.0.
5/23/2018 3:23:23 PM 3/3

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
i. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of
the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, storical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations
that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per
year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are
installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical
Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from
the land application field. rruVr,
A P P r 0 a 9

6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied
to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast
provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding
(see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate
such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method
which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding
should occur in order to control odor and flies.
s. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
lo. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates
on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop
planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than
30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied
from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet
from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet

13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainage ways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over-spraying. Animal waste may be applied
to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied
on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on
other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from wash down facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall
be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees,
shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms
and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which
will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures; piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on
a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.

20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre-plant with
no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at
least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall
be the rate-determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to
be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate
than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum
crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum
of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a
minimum of three years. Waste application records for all other waste shall
be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.

USDA
6 N RCS
NattralRes ufcLpCrnsent of ionSrrcuhure NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Natural Resources Conservation S?rvice
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590
Prepared for:
By:
Farm: Tract(s): Date:_J_/
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT?
Nutrient Management is applying nutrients
from all sources with the right placement, in fertilizer and manure application methods.
the right amount, at the right time, and from When precision ag/variable rate application
the right source to minimize nutrient losses to technology is utilized, see the next section of
surface and groundwater. This practice is this Job Sheet for additional guidance on plan
accomplished through development and requirements.
implementation of a Nutrient Management
Plan, which can be part of a broader • aerial site photog rap h(s)/imagery or site
Conservation Plan or CNMP that addresses map(s), and a soil survey map of the site,
multiple resource concerns. • Sufficient soils information—such as dominant
soil map until for each planned field—needed
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT to apply nutrients at RYE and Soil Test Report
determined rates as appropriate; and to not
A nutrient management plan is intended to exceed rates determined by nutrient risk
accomplish one or more of the following assessment planning criteria.
objectives: location of designated sensitive areas and the
associated nutrient application restrictions and
• To budget, supply, and conserve nutrients for setbacks,
plant production. results of approved risk assessment tools for
• To minimize agricultural nonpoint source any necessary evaluations for nitrogen,
pollution of surface and groundwater phosphorus, and erosion losses.
resources. current and/or planned plant production
• To properly utilize manure or organic by- sequence or rotation,
products as a plant nutrient source.
• soil, water, compost, manure, organic by-
• To protect air quality by reducing odors, product, and plant tissue sample analyses
nitrogen emissions (ammonia, oxides of applicable to the plan. Where non-NCDA soil
nitrogen), and the formation of atmospheric testing labs are used, nutrient
particulates. recommendations must be made using NCDA-
• To maintain or improve the physical, chemical, similar guidelines and methodologies. Note:
and biological condition of soil. high levels of soil copper and zinc may be toxic
to production crops. Land application of these
nutrients must be accordance with
CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT NCSU/NCDA crop toxicity guidelines.
MANAGEMENT PLAN Realistic yield goals for the crops planned for
The following components are included in nutrient application,
nutrient management plan specifications
typical of more 'traditional'
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 1

• Planned nitrogen application rates based on rates must be provided as specifications prior
NC Realistic Yield Expectations(RYEs) or to application.
sufficiently documented yield records, Note—where Diammonium phosphate(18-46-
• The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned 0) is the primary variable rate P fertilizer
fields, source applied on legume crops, additional N
• Planned P& K application rates based on soil will likely be needed to achieve RYEs.
test results (see next section where P& K The plan was developed based on the current
applied through variable rate technology). NRCS 590 standard and Federal, state, or
• listing and quantification of all nutrient sources local regulations or policies. Changes in laws
and form, including starter fertilizer or regulations may require a plan modification.
applications and legume-based cover crop This Job Sheet is a required supplement to
mixes. the Nutrient Management Plan.
• in accordance with the nitrogen and
phosphorus risk assessment tool(s), specify NC Permitted Animal O erations: For NC
the recommended nutrient application source, DENR-DWR or NPDES permitted animal
timing, amount(except for precision/variable operations, the waste utilization portion of the
rate applications specify method used to Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
determine rate), and placement of plant (CAWMP)must meet requirements specified by
nutrients for each field or management unit, the Permit. The NC 1217 Interagency Group
and provides guidance on the required minimum
elements of a CAWMP. This guidance is found in
• guidance for implementation, operation and Sec 1.1 of the latest 1217 Guidance Document,
maintenance, and recordkeeping as specified located at:
by the CNMP or applicable NC DWQ or httr)://www.ncaar.gov/SWC/tech/quidancedocumen
NDPES permit. ts.html.
Where recision/variable rate nutrient
application applications are planned and Nitrogen Leaching Index Values
made, some required planning components of Nitro en Leachin Index values obtained throw h
the preceding section may be provided by the use of current Soil H drolo is GroupSHG -based
overall conservation plan. In addition, the LI index maps in Sec II of the NC FOTG or RUSLE
2 field-specific soil loss calculations are included
following components are required in nutrient in the Nutrient Manaciement Plan. SHGs per soil
management planning. map unit are available through selection of the Soil
Data Explorer and Soil Properties and Qualities
• The geo-referenced field boundary and data (then select"Soil Qualities and Features")tabs
collected that was processed and analyzed as once an Area of Interest has been defined in
a GIS layer or layers to generate nutrient or NRCS Web Soil Survey.
soil amendment recommendations.
If the Nitrogen Leaching Index> 10 for planned
• Planned nitrogen application rates based on fields, appropriate conservation practices must be
NC RYEs or sufficiently documented yield included in a conservation plan to prevent nitrogen
records from leaving the field via surface or subsurface
• The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned runoff.
fields. Below are conservation crop management
• The nutrient recommendation guidance and techniques and practices recommended for
recommendation equations used to convert the mitigation of nitrate losses (practices also
GIS base data layer or layers to a nutrient documented in conservation plan):
source material recommendation GIS layer or
layers.
• Soil testing documentation that crop
Phosphorus(P205) and Potassium (K20)
nutrient or soil amendment application will be
made per soil test results similar to NCDA
guidelines. Where P & K will not be applied
via variable rate application technology, but by
basic GPS guidance, recommended P & K
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 2

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN PLAT Categorical Ratings Information
DEVELOPMENT When soil test phosphorus continues to increase
The nutrient management plan has been on a long term basis, PLAT may produce results
developed to meet nutrient application rate criteria that require P-based manure application planning
for all sources of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and planning for no additional manure P.
as specified by NRCS 590 Nutrient Management Conditions that will require P-based or no-P
standard criteria. planning will be based on site specific resource
conditions, which will facilitate data input into
In addition to NCDA Agronomic Division soil test PLAT. PLAT categorical ratings that will require
recommendations, or soil test recommendations enhanced P application planning are:
made through similar guidelines, the plan is based
on NC INMC approved values for realistic yield HIGH: P-based manure application is required
goals, nitrogen factors, phosphorus removal rates, (limited to P uptake in harvested crop biomass)
default nutrient values for animal waste, plant
availability coefficients for N, P, and K, and animal VERY HIGH: No additional manure P or starter P
waste generation volumes where applicable. application to be specified in nutrient management
Approved values are found at: plan.
htt .-Anutrients.soil.ncsu.edulindex.htm
Where manure is applied, farm records may also Phosphorus Drawdown Strate
be used through a procedure provided in SB 1217 Information:
Interagency Group guidance, available at: Implementation of a phosphorus'drawdown'
httn://www.ncaar.- ov/SWCftech/1217commiftee.ht strategy may be a consequence of PLAT results,
ml or may be requested in order to lower soil test
phosphorus levels.
For NC permitted animal operations, planning Should a reduction in soil test P be desired or
requirements for Plan"Amendments" (minor necessary, the only currently proven method of
modifications)and"Revisions" (Major substantial P`drawdown' is to not apply manure-
Modifications) are clarified by SB 1217 Interagency based P and to plant and harvest crops that utilize
Group Guidance. P currently present in the soil surface.
Crop specific estimated annual P removal amounts
ADDITIONAL PHOSPHORUS-RELATED are available on the NCSU Nutrient Management
PLAN INFORMATION (Applicable when in NC website:
increases in Soil Test P are expected on htto://nutrients.soil.ncsu.ed u/V ields/index.Ph
the planned area Conservation Practices and Management
In NC, a field-specific Phosphorus Loss Techniques to Reduce P Loss Potential:
Assessment Tool(PLAT) evaluation is completed Conservation practices, especially those that
in accordance with 590 Nutrient Management prevent soil particle detachment and trap sediment
standard General Criteria requirements, and at field edges are effective in preventing
phosphorus must be applied in accordance with phosphorus movement from the planned site.
590 standard Manure Phosl2horus Application Manure application techniques can also be applied
Rates. to reduce P loss risk. These practices must be
included in the conservation plan where
In addition to the basic plan components, plan determined PLAT risk= HIGH for planned fields.
information on PLAT categorical ratings, P
drawdown strategies, and conservation practices Consult the conservation plan developed in
to reduce P loss risk is required when increases in conjunction with the nutrient management plan for
Soil Test P are expected on the planned area. information on practices recommended to reduce
Typically, this could occur when manure is phosphorus AND nitrogen loss risks. Application
consistently applied at Nitrogen-based rates. High management techniques to reduce nutrient loss
levels of phosphorus in the surface soil layer have risk may be prescribed below:
been linked to increasing risk of P loss through
surface runoff and leaching.
❑ Increases in Soil Test P are expected
on the planned area(not typical if P
application made per soil test results).
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 3

Long Term Strategy for Reduction.of Soil P RECORDKEEPING
Levels: Waste reports from the NCDA&CS Agronomic
As noted in the P drawdown strategy section, the Division, or equivalent, are acceptable sources of
only currently proven method for reducing high information for determining applied manure nutrient
levels of soil P is not applying P, paired with amounts for recordkeeping or crop budgeting
producing crops on the planned site that use purposes.
existing soil P. Where soil P and PLAT
evaluations indicate an increasing risk to water Records must be maintained for at least 5 years, or
quality, substantially reducing soil P levels through for time and manner required by Permit for animal
crop uptake can take many years of operations to document plan implementation and
implementation. When P is not applied, and maintenance. As applicable, records include:
existing soil P is used by crops, eventually, soil will • soil, plant tissue, water, manure, and
become P deficient. Consult CES or NCDA organic by-product analyses resulting in
Regional Agronomy specialists for additional recommendations for nutrient application,
information soil test P reduction timelines. . quantities, analyses and sources of
nutrients applied,
Manure P produced in excess of crop
requirements: applications,
and method(s) of nutrient
aPPlications, source of nutrients, and rates
Consult the nutrient management plan fora
of application,
quantification of manure generated by the animal
feeding operation that may exceed crop P • weather conditions and soil moisture at the
requirements. time of application; lapsed time to manure
incorporation; rainfall or irrigation event,
"Manure Hauler" Information . crops planted, planting and harvest dates,
All manure waste applied on land owned by or yields, nutrient analyses of harvested
controlled by the Animal Feeding Operation (AFO) biomass, and crop residues removed,
owner or operator must be included in the nutrient • dates of plan review, name of reviewer,
management plan. The volume difference in total and recommended changes resulting from
manure waste generated by the AFO and waste the review, and
applied to land not owned or controlled by the . all enhanced efficiency fertilizer products
producer must be accounted for in a nutrient used.
management plan.
G Additional records for precision/variable rate
General information on manure waste generated
by an AFO to be applied to land not owned or sites must include:
controlled by the AFO owner or operator may be . maps identifying the variable application
recorded as specified in the NC CNMP source, timing, amount, and placement of
Certification Sheet and Documentation Checklist or all plant nutrients applied, and
other supplemental documentation to the nutrient
management plan. NRCS CNMP technical criteria GPS-based yield maps for crops where
rgquire documentation of manure exports off the yields can be digitally collected.
farm !this can be done below). The AFO . Documentation per field nitrogen
ownerloperator should provide the third party application rates do not exceed RYE-
applicator with a current waste analysis in order to based recommended rates
facilitate agronomic crop application of the facility's
generated waste. Should land not owned or • Documentation that applied phosphorus
controlled by the AFO owner or operator be and potassium recommendations do not
included in a nutrient management plan, the exceed recommended rates specified by
complete plan must meet 590 criteria. soil tests.
Type and Quantity of Animal Feeding Operation • For non-variable rate application of P &K,
(AFO) manure generated by the facility: provide applied map with field boundaries
indicating source, timing, method, and rate
of all applications.
Quantity of AFO manure generated to be exported . Where 'chlorophyll reader' technology is
off the farm for third party application: utilized, application records that nitrogen
rates match RYE-based N rates as closely
as possible.
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 4

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
The producer is responsible for safe operation and
maintenance of this practice, including all
equipment. Review the plan periodically to
determine if adjustments or modifications to the
plan are needed. In NC, animal operations
permitting provisions may specify more frequent
review periods. Adhere to the following operation
and maintenance provisions:
• Protect fertilizer and organic by-product
storage facilities from weather and accidental
leakage or spillage.
• Properly calibrate application equipment to
ensure uniform distribution of material at
planned rates.
• Workers should be protected from and avoid
unnecessary contact with inorganic fertilizers
and organic by-products. Extra caution must
be taken when handling ammonia sources of
nutrients, or when dealing with organic wastes
stored in unventilated enclosures.
• The disposal of material generated by the
cleaning of nutrient application equipment
should be accomplished properly. Excess
material should be collected and stored or field
applied in an appropriate manner. Excess
material should not be applied on areas of high
potential risk for runoff or leaching.
• Disposal or recycling of nutrient containers
should be done according to state and local
guidelines or regulations.
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 5

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
SWCD
NRCS
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the
facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow-possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field-actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s)that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
1 December 18, 1996

D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a
submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger(either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)regional office;
Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call
should include: your name, facility,telephone number, the details of the incident from item
2 above, the exact location of the facility,the location or direction of movement of the
spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number - -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - - , and
local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - - .
2 December 18, 1996

4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off. site damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address:
c. Contractors Phone:
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon(MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name:
b. Phone:
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
3 December 18, 1996

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Liquid Systems
Flush gutters Accumulation of solids 0 Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as
designed
O Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids 0 Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation O Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems
Feeders Feed spillage O Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage
0 Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7- to 10-
day interval during summer; 15-to 30-day interval
during winter)
AMIC -November 11, 1996, page 1

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause _ BMPs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
Feed storage Accumulations of feed O Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products)
O Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed
Animal holding areas . Accumulations of animal 0 Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
wastes and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
disturbance by animals is minimal
0 Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed)
Dry manure handling . Accumulations of animal O Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
systems wastes 7-to 10-day interval during summer; 15-to 30-day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
C3 Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
13 Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh,NC 27695-7613.
. AMIC -November 11, 1996, page 2

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
❑ Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
❑ Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18, 1996

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Dead animals • Carcass decomposition 0 Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water Improper drainage 0 Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities • Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto • Poorly maintained access 0 Farm access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access
Additional Information: Available From :
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 Rule/BMP Packet NCSU, County Extension Center
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System—Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory; EBAE 209-95 NCSU—BAE
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83 NCSU—BAE
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83 ' NCSU—BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet NCSU—BAE
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PR0107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
April 18, 2006, page 3

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead. • Dairy production 0 Vegetative or wooded buffers
0 Recommended best management practices
O Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn . Wet manure-covered 0 Scrape or flush daily
alley surfaces surfaces 0 Promote drying with proper ventilation
0 Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas Urine 0 Promote drying with proper ventilation
• Partial microbial 0 Replace wet or manure-covered bedding
decomposition
Manure dry stacks . Partial microbial 0 Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
decomposition
Storage tank or • Partial microbial 0 Bottom or mid-level loading
basin surface decomposition 0 Tank covers
• Mixing while filling 0 Basin surface mats of solids
e Agitation when emptying 0 Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
0 Agitate only prior to manure removal
O Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin • Partial microbial 0 Liquid drainage from settled solids
surfaces decomposition 0 Remove solids regularly
® Mixing while filling
• Agitation when em t in -
Manure, slurry, or • Agitation when spreading 0 Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader • Volatile gas emissions 0 Wash residual manure from spreader after use
outlets D Proven biological additives or oxidants
April 18, 2006, page 1

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Uncovered manure, a Volatile gas emissions while 0 Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on drying O Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces 0 Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
0 Proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks a Agitation of recycled lagoon 0 Flush tank covers
liquid while tanks are filling 0 Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti-siphon vents
Outside drain a Agitation during wastewater O Box covers
collection or junction conveyance
boxes _
Lift stations a Agitation during sump tank 0 Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at a Agitation during wastewater 0 Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces a Volatile gas emission 0 Proper lagoon liquid capacity
e Biological mixing 0 Correct lagoon startup procedures
e Agitation 0 Minimum surface area-to-volume ratio
O Minimum agitation when pumping
0 Mechanical aeration
CI Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler a High pressure agitation 0 Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
nozzles a Wind drift 0 Minimum recommended operating procedure
O Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
0 Pump from second-stage lagoon
• Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
April 18, 2006, page 2

USDA United States
Department of Agriculture Gaston County North Carolina Farm 2436
Tract 230
Lincoln 2018 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
1 42.08 HEL
15 16
2 16.4141 HEL
3 7.7 HEL
4 47.25 HEL
{ 1 5 125.37 HEL
Gaston 1 6 170.91 UHEL I Noncro land
-
Page Cropland Total: 138.81 acres
�r
Map Created October 25,2017
i-
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
I Non-Cropland
Tract Boundary
N _
Wetland Determination identifiers
3 'k • Restricted Use
Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
.r
Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all Oaks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs,
Wetland identifiers do not represent the size,shape,or speck determination of the area. Refer to your original determination(CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United StatesDepartmen Farm 3115
Agriculture Gaston County, North Carolina Agriculture Tract 239
Gaston
- _ 2018 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
1 6,62 HEL
2 2.19 HEL
r _ _ 3 2.03 HEL
4 20.45 UHEL Noncropland
5 10.41 1 UHEL I Noncro land
Page Cropland Total: 10.84 acres
.. 4
h
isil"r
1 Map Created January 16,2018
r Base Image Layer flown in 2016
lY: Common Land Unlit
Cropland
Non.Cropland
Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
Restricted Use
N V Limited Restrictions
w `° Exempt from Conservation
Feet Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the Information provided directly from the producerand/or the NAIP Imagery, The producer
accepts the data'as Is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs,
Wetland identifiers do not represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Refer to you roriginal determination(CPA_026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS,

USDA United States
Departmentof Farm 3115
Agriculture Gaston County, North Carolina
- Tract 240
2018 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
1 11.07 HEL
2 29.65 HEL
1 _ _ 3 14.25 HEL
4 2.14 HEL
5 20.21 DHEL I Noncro land_
Page Cropland Total: 57,11 acres
3
Gaston
t R' yi 2
! Map Created January 16,2018
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non-Cropland
VTract Boundary
` 4F
i Wetland Determination identifiers
a * Restricted Use
0 187.5 375 750 V Limited Restrictions
I I Exempt from Conservation
Frei Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represents legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery, The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with its use• The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs,
Wetland identifiers do not represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determination(CPA_026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS•

USDA United StatesDepartmenit Farm 3115
Agriculture of Gaston County, North Carolina
- : -- Tract 241
.► 2018 Program Year
! CLU Acres HEL Crop
1 1.41 HEL
2 24,13 HEL
_ 3 2.96,96 HEL
4 14.24 UHEL Noncro land
5 3.14 UHEL Noncro land
6 7.33 NHEL
7 2.08 HEL
8 7.44 HEL
9 1.29 HEL
11 10 2.2 UHEL
20 11 1.99 UHEL
12 0.5 HEL
16 1.75 UHEL Noncro land
20 4.75 UHEL Noncro land
1 d 30 9.09 HEL Noncro land
34 5,39 HEL Noncropland
Page Cropland Total: 51.33 acres
Y
Gaston
A
r + 4_
} ' f 1{1
' Map Created January 16,2018
- - a0 Base Image Layer flown in 2016
g
16
r Common Land Unit
Cropland
i Non-Cropland
' Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination identifiers
Restricted Use
0 175 350 700 0 Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
MW Feet Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery, The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with Its use, The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs,
Wetland identifiers do not represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area, Refer to your original determination(CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States
DepartAgriculture
Gaston County, North Carolina Farm 169
Tract 244
2018 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL I Crop
1 29.3 HE.L
2 95.87 UHEL Noncropland
3 2.18 LIHELJ Noncro land
"f Page Cropland Total: 29.3 acres
r�
r
Map Created October 25,2017
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
_.� Common Land Unit
Cropland
Y Non-Cropland
*A Tract Boundary
- - Wetland Determination identifiers
N Restricted Use
-
0 2> 440r 880 17 Limited Restrictions
" } a. Exempt from Conservation
��a Feet Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal surveyor reflect actual ownership;rather K depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery, The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all daks associated with its use, The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs,
Weiland Identifiers do not represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Referto your original determination(CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

kh
."•;y-�: .-1-.z'•�' �`•i�:@ -.`i� fir- �;A•-
�f�_ r,' r y a ■ 5=+ =-3.i 3�6- .
or
s�= _ w'
r�frx ���1E��� _ �;�Tkivr _ 'I+' .r f•jy34 '� _r_"_}. may'• •L":--
}-±.��'�°*^ -;�`�� r Sq�ra � : � d5�s•.::'I.i y-,._��i. _1��., Zf`I•.._
�•. � r�; �,._.�';` cam.'
�`, �- �'��, �_ �"=i,ry ,_�:�;. t_ ,�:�. •mot:':
tAk
�1 '.: �e •`.F � •ri�yT:r_Z .fin
tF
t.. w�� 'ry'tiLiS-Z��a-r �t.��.y�1"�•r �c.i T€��_ " �x bl ".� �a-�
r7ir .a�
-�,`i�,s— '�'.'ra'z ,f 1'�l q J", � 'Y�I., ter, a s�' � �h c�'.� - sy¢`� �S '?�•f 'S i _
P •ti g a � a, P t t-y .�. � f r A p.-,
� R4:�t P �,r��.s,'-'e`�i� ��ir•3,.r�`]'�s.. �i ''-'a 6` e,5� �.�@ 4•r'st ca P'�',
4*�r'S'r 'TAT- �i-4�` ir+[ r 'c-F• ' -F'�'' '' _ -S i5 s t �» y
7lR i[ y��nj'-�u,�.•'.� rP' '�f � a'�,:sy i� a r� �, r ._r3(' f •t � qe
`r �. ;'�'`Yf��,i 1 .a " ��ti 9�-h. �s'�- �7� . +'.sy •� y„ J � it a- G Sj$YsI
�5 'a�•�r` a s 1c r�y� y _} n,� d+,' �e �m�r" .SF= d" 3r.r.
L� !� �. i+'+k� R'l.� ''� S�74 =� Y.r Tt'� •S h: 9 � �s �#`' - 3 f
�' •S �b '��a h 6��i � - �r..a '� _ -w. R' .r•�� 1. '4. X.. 3 `e^.� -,fr� �.
3.-,f F`��+��r'i Zalz���4 '�tj s•��������,7�,��4�n,Fa- �° �..^`�Ia t�r,F'2f _ �e a i;, a. ���.,�1g�, s'
��� '�'r w �.��y x i�� o �w�'• >y�r kl--a°f ,S'vf'J'I..c S•I ry _ i.'r s�A -x
3^-�yj� T � �! T 1`.G� �'�TJ :li.� V�rx.. '�'..r L�,.�1 � a•` � �'� 'i
'rRM1a�a3.Cq }-
���� y�,_ P�'<�t � Fz.���hc � t •c c<;r`� ��+�T � �F;E° y��A a 'S _.�,{���;�
' '� •"s'�t + r� �, �-s''r wp �[*A v ,� a 'a" a-"+ 4`' ray•rt-4 *q-,P, f
NN
�_'• [ea ;S•rs �°a+ r�"'` ��i ex-� a #� iuy -r 5•���- � _ '°'��'t.. rxZ` J r�4 +-�s���''
■ 'ia- t a 1 � s�-f '`gam K t{ ���'•. #�
Y.e ��n'�� ..� r3 3.,.1 ��•a'��,�A���,
7! 3_.-a I:� - a.. 9 'IA v. �•n h�#ram � � �>:_,., .l+' 1�� ��e�ll� tt
` +- p. �,. -� a� R § •�. x ¢-s;•. a �. i +w x° � _ "? �*��
«��,•;5��' .r'= [-q Rao ;. afZ
a �- - 9 x: �t.'�. °'`rr•� 4 ipt�a..l ' ..]�•R3r �'. #r ;�:
t Xr 'r~
''. 46-�,u �' 3 6 ��'• 'r e� -[�iP4
� �-++ `� 37 irkz�sv� �
�:.iY �.e'�•d-s �'� ui # 31���" i� �'r Faa 'tit y 4�3 r •-> >. � �.:"9 �.S:H"s�[F'
a. 'fa
_ �7 'rR'��V y, ,r.tr .�• �, f c. � c� ` �.s sf s } �� ; : •tl
xr �i �^e YS + > i s 'Sryl 3 Mt tar° e+'tit.-!� °� i ,� �r..�,��t i➢.�,�lr i 3_ r
VIP; � �-gtr� s - r•aL +Y'4,P �..�5 _r _ .s .�.�. s a 3Y1"4s
ja
� } G .� J tti' sv -r"�3� •., pp�`a- y e v r r a 2 - � x �T�'-. •^d�s 6 .�'�• � 31f oe � 1• $� "{g'1 r,.?'' t+'�1 F�'3 a� f' [r�.S � �F 'i' - Y a
��.���'' r� >., �� � �� r{, '�.'"��3� as-gi�� ,rs+ ` ' �•'� $ Tlr�
�•= r�-�Tng'krN �r�.. `��. � �Y.s�" '�;r��`'�c r��-�,y�,�,4 t qw g ,�:t� ' ,�"�?� . -� r'°'•, .�
�t� �e +y�°� �5 �`�'�� �� n -��Sa���� fit; air#�i�p"*r^',, �'�3 s• s,� ;���� ���- ,,
.�:Ir_ �3*�e,�-t�� -y'e•.�3� a, �� ��$-i �.x3 r;f� �h}�� , It`-r��r. �.T� rs a
•�� see

USDA United States
y Departmentof- Gaston County, North Carolina Farm 2180 Agriculture
_ g Tract 3078
2018 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL Crop
0 �''+V
r- 1 11.4 UHEL Noncro land
• " 2 3.33 HEL
_ 3 13.2 HEL
4 39.03 HEL
w - Y 5 1.63 UHEL
6 1.51 UHEL
_ r► 10 7 2.96 UHEL
8 18.3 HEL
.
L 9 18.59 HEL
10 16.94 HEL
11 13,43 HEL
12 2.45 HEL
13 12.32 HEL
14 32.03 HEL
- 15 2.47 UHEL
16 40.82 HEL
17 8.83 HEL
1818.97 HEL
19 9.06 HEL
Gaston 20 2.25 HEL
_ 21 0,06 UHEL Noncro land
4 14. 22 3.47 UHEL Noncro land
t
23 53.3 1 UHEL Noncro land
r Page Cropland Total: 248.12 acres
R 10
Map Created October 25,2017
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
ok Cropland
n$ Non.Cropland
Cleveland Tract Boundary
f
_ r Wetland Determination Identifiers
r tr Restricted Use
0 320 `640 1,280 V Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
Feet Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represents legal survey or reflect actual ownership,rather It depicts the information provided directly from the producer a ndlor the NAIP Imagery, The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with its use, The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs,
Wetland identifiers do not represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determination(CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS,

_USDA United States
DepartmentGaston County, North Carolina Farm 2769
Agricultureulture
oastnn Tract 3707
i
2018 Program Year
',a1 CLU Acres I HEL Crop
5 3.76 1 UHEL
22 0.06 1 UHEL I Noncropiand
v. Page Cropland Total: 3.76 acres
4..
Map Created October 25,2017
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non-Cropland
Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
Restricted Use
0 175 350 70,0 V Limited Restrictions
t Exempt from Conservation
Feet Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represents legal survey or reflect actual ownership:rather it depicts the Information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs
Wetland identifiers do not represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Referto your original determination(CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States Farm 3117
Department of Agriculture Gaston County, North Carolina
Gaston f,, Tract 3881
2018 Program Year
s CLU Acres HEL Crop
�_lsi7 e C z 2 1.09 UHEL
3 8.24 UHEL
r 6 15.61 CJHEL
8 6.85 UHEL
28 28 112.03 1 UHEL Noncro land
Page Cropland Total: 31.79 acres
_ 8
VIP
Map Created January 16,2018
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
,_ - r Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non-Cropland
Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
Restricted Use
1 80 716 d V Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
Feet Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal surveyor reflect actual ownership;rather it depicts the Information provided directly from the producerand/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data'as is'and assumes all risks associated with Its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage Incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs,
Wetland identifiers do not represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determination(CPA.026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDAUnited States
Department of Farm 3117
Agriculture Gaston County, North Carolina
Gaston .— Tract 3882
2018 Program Year
I CLU Acres I HEL Crop
s..�
24 j 3_72 1 UHEL
Page Cropland Total: 3.72 acres
24
Map Created January 16,2018
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
4
Restricted Use
d 175 36D 700 V Limited Restrictions
I I Exempt from Conservation
Feet Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal surveyor reflect actual ownership,rather it depicts the Information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP Imagery, The producer
accepts the date'as is'and assumes all risks associated with its use, The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifiers do not represent the size,shape,or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determination(CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS,

PeB2 - rLdB2
�LdB2 Pa,E f
' L�
PeG2}� JC2ChA
LdC LdC}2 Pecs LA
PaD CeB2 ( 1
WyC
LaB2 j
L�lDc PaID2
� •::-� CEB2 �
E
-V k =
Pa E
•�•k� G:B
- Ch A
jar '' •` LdB2
F
HeB
W D all =
WnS
B 2 e8'2
._ FirB 4ti SQ2 L:1C�..
Ap _
J 'P rE
f PnD2 `. e _ LdB2
ChA �• '" �r C 132
Ce6 P,-E 0 ;
,.�al]2` .. v•

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of interest(AOI) Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
0 Area of Interest(AOI) Stony Spot 1:24,000.
Solis Very Stony Spot
F- Soil Map Unit Polygons Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Wet Spot
,. Soil Map Unit Lines Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can-cause
® Soil Map Unit Points Other misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
Special Line Features line placement.The maps do not show the small areas of
Special Point Features contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
Wo Blowout Water Features 1 scale,
Borrow Pit Streams and Canals - --
Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Clay Spot Rails measurements.
Closed Depression
Interstate Highways
Gravel Pit Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
US Routes Web Soil Survey URL:
Gravelly Spot Major Roads Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857)
Landfill Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Lava Flow projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts
Background distance and area,A projection that preserves area,such as the
Marsh or swamp Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more
Mine or Quarry accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
0 Miscellaneous water This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
0 Perennial Water of the version date(s)listed below.
%4 Rock Outcrop Soil Survey Area: Gaston County,North Carolina
+ Saline Spot Survey Area Data; Version 17,Sep 26,2017
Sandy Spot Soil Survey Area; Lincoln County,North Carolina
Severely Eroded Spot Survey Area Data: Version 21,Sep 26,2017
Sinkhole Your area of interest(AOI)includes more than one soil survey
Slide or Slip area.These survey areas may have been mapped at different
scales,with a different land use in mind,at different times,or at
Sodic Spot different levels of detail.This may result in map unit symbols,soil
properties,and interpretations that do not completely agree
across soil survey area boundaries.
7

Custom Soil Resource Report
i
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Apr 23,2014—Nov
28,2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps,As a result,some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident,
8

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
ApB Appfing sandy loam, 1 to 6 11.4 2.4%
percent slopes
CeB2 Cecil sandy day loam,2 to 8 111 A 23.7%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
ChA Chewada loam,0 to 2 percent 80.6 17.1%
slopes,frequently flooded
HeB Helena sandy loam, 1 to 6 9.0 1.9%
percent slopes
LdB2 Lloyd sandy day loam,2 to 8 54.1 11.5%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
LdD2 Lloyd sandy day loam,8 to 15 25.5 5.4%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
PaD2 Pacolet sandy day loam,8 to 77.0 16.4%
15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
PaE Pacolet sandy loam,15 to 25 23.8 5.1%
percent slopes
WeD Wedowee sandy loam,6 to 15 0.0 0.0%
percent slopes
WkD Wilkes loam,6 to 15 percent 6.3 1.3%
slopes
WkF Wilkes loam,15 to 30 percent 1.1 0 2%
slopes
WnB Winnsboro loam,2 to 8 percent 6.4 1.4%
slopes
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 406.8 86.5%
Totats for Area of Interest 470.3 100.0%
tM7ap_UUniltSym�bol Map Unit Name Acres in AOt Percent of AOI
CeB2 Cecil sandy day loam,2 to 8 2.5 0.5%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
ChA Chewada loam,0 to 2 percent 32.1 6.8%
slopes,frequently flooded
LdB2 Lloyd sandy day loam,2 to 8 8.6 1.8%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
LdC2 Lloyd sandy day loam,8 to 15 8.4 1.8%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded _
PaD Pacolet sandy loam,15 to 25 0.81 0.2%I
percent slopes -�-- ---- ---�
9

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
PaE Pacolet sandy loam,25 to 45 0.5 0.1%
percent slopes
PeB2 Pacolet sandy day loam,2 to 8 0.7 0.1%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
PeC2 Pacolet sandy day loam,8 to 8.9 1.9°%
15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
WyC Wynott-Winnsboro-Rowan 1.1 0.2%
complex,8 to 15 percent
slopes
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 63.6 13.5%
Totals for Area of Interest 470.3 100.0%
10

ChA ChA-PaD.—.
L jD�A/,
r ., L�,'62I• tcfB2 � Co1aJ��
yJnD'HeB - *; "
C h k -
ChA
4
�WnB -.: ,. . Pa02 aE
WnD L
PaD2
*' WeD
Bogert Rd HeB----
W CeB2
_ He
Ce62
_ 17 �P-B.-HeB
we D
vv
�4 Pab2 �f S VaB W D
a _ � PID2
WEA
.CeB2"
ApB WeD ChA `�,•.
HeB r.
r Lc C2..•
CeB2
PaE
f •� PaD2 PaD2 CeB2
C;D2 CeB2 PIaE
_ _ `Ce132- �N � CeB2 _..� .

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest(AOI) Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
Area of Interest(AOU 1:24,000.
Stony Spot
Soils Very Stony Spot
Soil Map Unit Polygons Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale,
.t Jr Soil Map Unit Lines Wet Spot
Other Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
p Soil Map Unit Points misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
Special Line Features line placement.The maps do not show the small areas of
Special Point Features contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
Blowout Water Features scale.
Borrow Pit Streams and Canals
Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Clay Spot - -. Rails measurements.
0 Closed Depression Interstate Highways
Gravel Pit Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
US Routes Web Soil Survey URL:
Gravelly Spot Major Roads Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3657)
Landfill Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Lava Flow Background projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area,A projection that preserves area,such as the
Marsh or swamp Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more
Mine or Quarry accurate calculations of distance or area are required,
o Miscellaneous Water This product Is generated from the USDA_NRCS certified data as
0 Perennial Water of the version date(s)listed below,
�,e Rock Outcrop Soil Survey Area: Gaston County,North Carolina
L Saline Spot Survey Area Data: Version 17,Sep 26,2017
Sandy Spot Soil Survey Area: Lincoln County,North Carolina
Severely Eroded Spot Survey Area Data: Version 21,Sep 26,2017
I
Sinkhole Your area of interest(AOI)includes more than one soil survey
Slide or Slip area.These survey areas may have been mapped at different
scales,with a different land use in mind,at different times,or at
Sodic spot different levels of detail.This may result in map unit symbols,soil
properties,and interpretations that do not completely agree
across soil survey area boundaries.
7

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Apr 23,2014—Nov
28,2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries mray be evident,
8

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
ApB I Appfing sandy loam,1 to 6 18.7 3.0%
percent slopes
CeB2 Cecil sandy day loam,2 to 8 65.9 10.5%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
CeD2 Cecil sandy day loam,8 to 15 12.0 1.9%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
CfB Cecil-Urban land complex,2 to 2.7 0.4%
8 percent slopes
ChA Chewada loam,0 to 2 percent 90.0 14.4%
slopes,frequently flooded
CoA Congaree loam,0 to 2 percent 56.3 9.0%
slopes,occasionally flooded
HeB Helena sandy loam,1 to 6 94.7 15.1%
percent slopes
LdB2 Lloyd sandy day loam,2 to 8 124.3 19.8%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
LdD2 Lloyd sandy day loam,8 to 15 4.1 0.6%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
PaD2 Pacolet sandy day loam,8 to 56.2 9.0%
15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
PaE Pacolet sandy loam,15 to 25 31.8 5.1%
percent slopes
i
VaB Vance sandy loam,2 to 8 16.7 2.7%
percent slopes
W Water 7.8 1.2%
WeD Wedowee sandy loam,6 to 15 30.3 4.8%
percent slopes
WnB Winnsboro loam,2 to 8 percent 5.2 0.8%
slopes
WnD Winnsboro loam,8 to 15 4.7 0.7%
percent slopes
WoA Worsham loam,0 to 2 percent 4.9 0.8%
slopes
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 626.2 100.0%
Totals for Area of Interest 626.5 100.0%
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
ChA Chewada loam,0 to 2 percent 0.0 0.0%
slopes,frequently flooded
9

Custom Soil Resource Report
i Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOt Percent of AOI
PaD Pacolet sandy loam,15 to 25 0.2 0.0%
percent slopes
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 0.3 0.0%
Totals for Area of Interest 526.5 100.0%
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
3 Soil Map m
0
N
m �
46M 401M 461POO 46M 46M 46MM 46M 468700 4WBW
35°2531°N 35'2531'N
i N. k
— —
t —4R
r
ChA Pa
4`
r
j r�
r
E; Oil
35°24'5YN l 3T 24'SrN
45M 4681(0 4.1 4.= 4.1 46M 46860D 46UM 46BBOD
3 3
b H
Map Scale:1:s,760 if printed on A portrait(SS'x 11")sheet o
n Meters
m N 0 50 100 201) 300 m
AFeet
0 250 50D 1000 1500
Map projection:Web Mercator Comer coordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zone 17N WGS84
6

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of interest(AOI) Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
Area of Interest(AOI) Stony Spot 1:24,000.
Soils Very Stony Spot
Soil Map Unit Polygons Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Wet Spot �
Soil Map Unit Lines Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
Other misunderstanding p Soil Map Unit Points g of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
.• Special Line Features line placement.The maps do not show the small areas of
Special Point Features contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
Blowout Water Features scale,
.�. Streams and Canals —
Borrow Pit
X. Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Clay Spot Rails measurements,
0 Closed Depression interstate Highways
Gravel Pit Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
US Routes Web Soil Survey URL:
Gravelly Spot Major Roads Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857)
0 Landfill Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
A. Lava Flow Background projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the
Marsh or swamp Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more
ski Mine or Quarry accurate calculations of distance or area are required,
0 Miscellaneous Water This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
0 Perennial Water of the version date(s)listed below,
W Rock Outcrop Soil Survey Area: Gaston County,North Carolina
Saline Spot Survey Area Data: Version 17,Sep 26,2017
Sandy Spot
Soil Survey Area: Lincoln County,North Carolina
Severely Eroded Spot Survey Area Data: Version 21,Sep 26,2017
Sinkhole Your area of Interest(AOI)includes more than one soil survey
Slide or Slip area,These survey areas may have been mapped at different
scales,with a different land use in mind,at different times,or at
Sodic Spot different levels of detail.This may result in map unit symbols,soil
properties,and interpretations that do not completely agree
across soil survey area boundaries.
7

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
i
Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Apr 23,2014—Nov
28,2017
i
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
8

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name= Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
ChA Chewada loam,0 to 2 percent 2A
slopes,frequently flooded
LdB2 Lloyd sandy day loam,2 to 8 0.6 0.5%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
LdD2 Lloyd sandy day loam,8 to 15 1.6 1.2%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 4.5 3.6%
Totals for Area of Interest 125.9 100.0%
Map Unit Symbol M Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
111 ChA Chewada loam,0 to 2 percent 0.8 0.6%
slopes,frequently flooded
LdB2 Lloyd sandy day loam,2 to 8 14.1 11.2%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
LdC2 Lloyd sandy day loam,8 to 15 10.9 8.6%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
PaC Pacolet sandy loam,8 to 15 2.7 2.1%
percent slopes
PaD Pacolet sandy loam,15 to 25 8.5 6.7%
percent slopes
PaE Pacolet sandy loam,25 to 45 1.4 1.1%
percent slopes
PeB2 Pacolet sandy day loam,2 to 8 62.6 49.7%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
PeC2 Pacolet sandy day loam,8 to 20.5 16.3%
15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 121.4 96.4%
Totals for Area of Interest 125.9 100.0%
9

Custom Soil Resource Report
M Soil Map
� a
N
� m
45M 4VOD 46040D 460700 4610M 4613M 461800 4619M 462200 46M
35°24'25'N y -•,�� - - - - 14R {�. 3P 24'25"N
;IS .ayt_e { '. . V
1
� l
Soil
35°23'26"N I �I 35°2Y 26"N
45M 46MOO 460400 460700 461000 4613M 461600 461900 462200 4625M
3 3
Map Scale:1:12,900 if printed on A landscape(11"x 8,Y)sheet �d
Meters
N 0 18D 300 600 900
A ��—— Feet
( 50D 1000 20M 3000
Map projection:Web Mercator Caner coordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zone 17N WGS84
6

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest(AOI) Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your A01 were mapped at
Area of Interest(AOI) 1:24,000.
Stony Spot
Soils Very Stony Spot
Soil Map Unit Polygons Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale,
`• Wet Spot
Soil Map Unit Lines Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of ma
Other g P Y Aping can cause
p Soil Map Unit Points misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
Special Line Features line placement.The maps do not show the small areas of
Special Point Features contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
Blowout Water Features scale,
Streams and Canals
Borrow Pit
Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Clay Spot Rails measurements,
0 Closed Depression � Interstate Highways
Gravel Pit Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
US Routes Web Soil Survey URL:
Gravelly Spot Major Roads Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3867)
a Landfill Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Al Lava Flow Background projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area,A projection that preserves area,such as the
4k Marsh or swamp Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more
A* Mine or Quarry accurate calculations of distance or area are required,
0 Miscellaneous Water This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
0 Perennial Water of the version date(s)listed below,
IV Rock Outcrop Soil Survey Area: Cleveland County,North Carolina
+ Saline Spot Survey Area Data: Version 20,Sep 26,2017
Sandy Spot Soil Survey Area: Gaston County,North Carolina
Severely Eroded Spot Survey Area Data: Version 17,Sep 26,2017
Sinkhole Your area of interest(A01)includes more than one soil survey
Slide or Slip area.These survey areas may have been mapped at different
scales,with a different land use in mind,at different times,or at
Sodic Spot different levels of detail.This may result in map unit symbols,soil
properties,and interpretations that do not completely agree
across soil survey area boundaries,
7

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Apr 23,2014—Nov
28,2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident,
8

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol ; Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
CaB2 Cecil sandy day loam,2 to 8 19.8 3.3%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
ChA Chewada loam,0 to 2 percent 1.5 0.3%
slopes,frequently flooded
HeB Helena-Worsham complex 1 to 1.9 0.3%
6 percent slopes
PaC2 Pacolet sandy day loam,8 to 7.2 1.2%
15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 30.4 5.1%
Totals for Area of Interest 594.7 100.0%
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
ApB Appling sandy loam,1 to 6 12.7 2.1%
percent slopes
CeB2 Cecil sandy day loam,2 to 8 366.4 61.6%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
CeD2 Cecil sandy day loam,8 to 15 127.7 21.5%
percent slopes,moderately
eroded
ChA Chewada loam,0 to 2 percent 9.6 1.6%
slopes,frequently flooded
PaE Pacolet sandy loam,15 to 25 27.8 4.7%
percent slopes
VaB Vance sandy loam,2 to 8 1.3 0.2%
percent slopes
W Water 0.2 0.0%
WoA Worsham loam,0 to 2 percent 18.5 3.1%
slopes
Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 94.9%
Totals for Area of Interest 100.0%
9

C. Sizing Waste Storage Ponds #1, #2 & #3
Waste Storage Pond #1 behind freestall barns
213' x 70'
2 . 7'
2: 1 2: 1
2 : 1 7 . 3' 2 : 1
173' x 30'
Volume = 7 . 3/6 [173 x 30 + 202 . 2 x 59. 2 + 4 (187 . 6 x 44 . 6) ]
= 61, 597 cu ft
Waste Storage Pond #2 behind Parlor
84' x 84'
2 . 0'
2 : 1 9. 0' 2 : 1
4 0' x 4 0'
Volume = 9 . 0/6 [40 x 40 + 76 x 76 + 4 (58 x 58) ]
= 31, 248 cu ft
Sizing Waste Pond #3
296' x 186'
2 . 4'
3 : 1 8 . 6' 3 : 1
230' x 120'
Volume = 8 . 6/6 [230 x 120 + 281 . 6 x 171 . 6 + 4 (255 . 8 x 145. 8) ]
= 335, 850 cu ft
Design Volume all Ponds = 61, 597 + 31, 248 + 335, 850
= 428, 695 cu ft