230002_Permit Renewal Application 2019_20190410

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Animal Waste Management Systems
Request for Certification of Coverage
Facility Currently covered by an Expiring Sate Non -Discharge General Permit
On September 30, 2019, the North Carolina State Non -Discharge General Permits for Animal Waste Management Systems will
expire. As required by these permits, facilities that have been issued Certificates of Coverage to operate under these State
Non -Discharge General Permits must apply for renewal at least 180 days prior to their expiration date. Therefore, all applications
must be received by the Division of Water Resources by no later than April 3, 2019.
Please do not leave any question unanswered Please verify all information and make any necessary corrections below.
Application must be signed and dated by the Permittee.
1. Farm Number: 23-0002 Certificate Of Coverage Number: AWC230002
2. Facility Name: G.W. Bell & Sons Dair;
3. Landowner's Name (same as on the Waste Management Plan): Jerry T Bell
4. Landowner's Mailing Address: 765 Bell Rd
City: Kin.2sMountain State: NC Zip: 28086-8759
Telephone Number: 704-734-0480 Ext. E-mail: i 1152b cr,msn.com
5. Facility's Physical Address: 765 Bell Rd
City: Kinos Mountain State: NC Zip: 280868759
6. County where Facility is located: Cleveland
7. Farm Manager's Name (if different from Landowner): Jerry T Bell
8. Farm Manager's telephone number (include area code): 704-739-4895 Ext.
9. Integrator's Name (if there is not an Integrator, write "None"):
10. Operator Name (OIC): Jerry T. Bell Phone No.: 704-739-4895 OIC #: 21559
11. Lessee's Name (if there is not a Lessee, write "None"):
12. Indicate animal operation type and number:
Current Permit: Operations Type Allowable Count
Cattle - Dairy Calf 50
Cattle - Dairy Heifer 290
Cattle - Milk Cow 300
Operation Types:
Swine Cattle Dry Poultry Other Types
Wean to Finish Dairy Calf Non Laying Chickens Horses - Horses
Wean to Feeder Dairy Heifer Laying Chickens Horses - Other
Farrow to Finish Milk Cow Pullets Sheep - Sheep
Feeder to Finish Dry Cow Turkeys Sheep - Other
Farrow to Wean Beef Stocker Calf Turkey Pullet
Farrow to Feeder Beef Feeder
Boar/Stud Beef Broad Cow Wet Poultry
Gilts Other Non Laying Pullet
Other Layers

13. Waste Treatment and Storage Lagoons (Verify the following information is accurate and complete. Make all necessary
corrections and provide missing data )
Structure
Name
Estimated
Date
Built
Liner Type
(Clay, Synthetic,
Unknown)
Capacity
(Cubic Feet)
Estimated
Surface Area
(Square Feet)
Design
Freeboard
"Redline"
(Inches)
LOWER WSP
Jggj
f��"7
4/ • S._� C.
0 I
Z ©, W
MILK PARLOR WSP
j737
cb"
9I �C���
��S
Z�. t�
Mail one (1) copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with this completed and signed application
as required by NC General Statutes 143-215.10C(d) to the address below.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
1.
The most recent Waste Utilization Plan (WUP), signed In the owner and a certified technical specialist
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g•
h.
The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation, injection, etc.)
A map of every field used for land application (for example: irrigation map)
The soil series present on every land application field
The crops grown on every land application field
The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP
The maximum PAN to be applied to every land application field
The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
The required NRCS Standard specifications
containing:
2. A site map/schematic
3. Emergency Action Plan
4. Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
5. Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
6. Mortality Control Checklist with selected method noted - Use the enclosed updated Mortality Control Checklist
7. Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.) Please be sure the above table is accurate and
complete. Also provide any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to
your facility.
8. Operation and Maintenance Plan
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal.
(e.g. composting, digesters, waste transfers, etc.)
As a second option to mailing paper copies of the application package, you can scan and email one signed copy of the
application and all the CAWMP items above to: [e-mail]

I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that,
if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not
included, this application package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false statement,
representation, or certification in any application may be subject to civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation. (18 U.S.C.
Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both for
a similar offense.)
Printed Name of Signing Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all landowners should sign. If Landowner is a
corporation, signature should be by a principal executive officer of the corporation):
Name:
741
Signature:
Title: / 1 a.fle: Y
Date:
Name: J. 1.t �,� Title:
Signature: ✓( Date:
Name: Title:
Signature: _ _ _ _ Date:
?-2 If n er
3--25-49
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
FORM: RENEWAL -STATE GENERAL 02/2019

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
3c ri2ory
LINDA. CULPEPPER
Director
NORTH CAROt,1NA
Environmental Quality
February 26, 2019
Jerry T Bell
G.W. Bell & Sons Dairy
765 Bell Rd
Kings Mountain, NC 28086-8759
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring State General Permit
Dear Permittee:
APR
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation State Non -Discharge General Permits,
which expire on September 30, 2019. Copies of the new animal waste operation State Non -Discharge General Permits are available
at hrtps://deu.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-qualitF-regional-operations/afo or by writing or calling:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number: [phone]
In order to assure your continued coverage under the State Non -Discharge General Permits. you must submit an application for
permit coverage to the Division. Enclosed you will find a "Request for Certificate of Coverage Facility_ Currently Covered by an
Expiring State Non -Discharge General Permit." The application form must be completed, signed and returned b+, April 3, 2019.
Please note that you must include one tl) couy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with the
completed and signed application form. A list of items included in the CAWMP can be found on pane 2 of the renewal
application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the State Non -Discharge General Permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feel
free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Branch staff at 919-707-9100.
Enclosures
cc (w/o enclosures):
Sincerely,
•.s
Jon Risgaard, Section Chief
Animal Feeding Operations and Groundwater Section
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Cleveland County Soil and Water Conservation District
AFOG Section Central Files - AWC230002
North Csro§na Department of Environmental Quality 1 Diwson of Water Resources
512 N. Salisbury St. 1 1636 Mail Service Center 1 Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919..707 9000

This plan has been prepared for:
GW Bell Dairy
Jerry T. Bell
765 Bell Rd
Kings Mtn, NC 28086
704.434-0480
GW Bell Dairy
9114/2018
APR 0 2 204
This plan has been developed by:
Cleveland SWCD
Stephen Bishop
844 Wallace Grove Drive
Shelby, NC 28150
704-471-0235
Developer Sigture
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
f �. r'
f1-' i " (,
Snature (owner)
Sigq tune (manager or producer)
../(4/1
Date
3l Z2/17
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S.Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and
Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
5--25—lc)) ?
Technical Specialist Signature 1 Date

GW Bell Dairy
9114/2018
Type of Flan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Narrative:
This waste plan update for G.W. Bell Dairy uses new soli samples for all fields and adds and
deletes some fields since the previous plan In 2011, To simpify the plan, Waste Management Units
(WMUs) were used Instead of standard FSA Tract and Field Numbers since many of FSA Tracts
and Fields did not accurately reflect current management (a key to cross reference WMUs to FSA
Tract and Field numbers is included). Waste storage and cow numbers stay the same as the
previous plan except that the Bells have reduced waste pushed into lower pit from 150 to 80
heifers. This plan update accounts for slurry from 300 milking cows (upper storage pond) and 80
heifers (lower storage pond) and solid waste from 50 calves. The upper storage pond is designed
for 90 day temporary storage and waste muste be removed every 3 months. The lower storage
pond is designed for 180 days of storage and for waste to be removed twice per year. Group calf
pens will be cleaned out as needed for healthy growth of calves and waste piled under cover until
being spread.
2/22/2019 3:00:25 PM 1 / 1

Sources in Plan
GW Bell Dairy
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
S5
Dairy (Calf) Solid waste generated 205 tons/year by a 50 Dairy (Calf) Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Injected
1,378
Incorporated-4 wks or less following
application
Incorporated-5wks to 3 mos
following application
Broadcast
1,378
918
918
Irrigated
918
Max. Available Actual PAN
PAN (lbs) * Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus /
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Quantity
Applied (Tons)
Surplus/ Deficit (Tons)
Year 1
918
1,363
(445)
304
(99)
2/22/2019 2:55:16 PM 113

Sources in Plan
GW Bell Dairy
S 6
Dairy (Heifer) Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 442,800 gals/year by a 80 Dairy (Heifer) Liquid
Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180
days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Injected
4,436
Incorporated-4 wks or Tess following
application
4,436
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
following application
2,957
Broadcast
2,957
Irrigated
2,957
Max. Available
PAN (Ibs) =
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus /
Deficit (Ibs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/ Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
2,957
8,464
(5,507)
1,267,442
(824,642)
2/22/2019 2:55:16 PM 2 / 3

S8
Sources in Plan
GW Bell Dairy
Dairy (Milk Cow) Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 2,324,700 gals/year by a 300 Dairy (Milk Cow)
Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has waste storage capacities of approximately
90 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Injected
23,289
Incorporated-4 wks or less following
application
Incorporated-5 wks to 3 mos
following application
23,289
Broadcast
15,526
Irrigated
15,526
15,526
Max. Available 1 Actual PAN 1 PAN Surplus /
PAN (lbs)* Applied (lbs) Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/ Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
15,526
92,335
(76,809)
13,825,231
(11,500,531)
2/22/2019 2:55:16 PM 3 / 3

Planned Crops Summary
GW Bell Dairy
The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in the plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates
and Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) recommendations are also provided for each crop as well as the crop's P205 Removal
Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field,
where available.
If a filed's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested
plant biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive
no additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with
North Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the
following table if the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Crop.. : ... ':;'..
MbB2 =,Nib:
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
87'
Medium
42
.a
NA
Corn, Silage
16.1 Tons
175
Medium
55
NA
i9.13.
79
[ulbB2; RJA
Corn, Silage
16,1 Tons
175
Medium
55
NA
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
87
Medium
42
NA
213
O.79'
-NA
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
87 Medium
42
NA
Corn, Silage
16.1 Tons
175 Medium
55
NA
1 ...-12349
Corn, Silage
16.1 Tons
175
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
87
Medium
Medium
55
42
NA
NA
Fescue Hay
3.6 Tons
158
Law
57
NA
Small Grain, Silage
6.4 Tons
71
Low
35
NA
Corn, Silage
14.4 Tons
157
Low
49
NA
McG2:
NA
Fescue Pasture
3.2 Tons
108
Medium'
5
NA
4;05
NA
Sorghum -Sudan Pasture
3.5 Tons
129
High
5
0
Small Grain, Silage
6.5 Tons
72
High
35
35
5:49
:=McC2i_13
Fescue Pasture
2/22/2019 2:56:06 PM 1 / 4

.,.6
52
752
Planned Crops Summary
GW Bell Dairy
McG2
b82:
NA
1 '.:.....::;..r;`;9.03:' `HhB''NA
1
_1
f
-.12 28
02
29
11.93
.66
HRC
hB.
l 1hB
Fescue Pasture
Small Grain, Silage
3.2 Tons
6.5 Tons
1061 Low
72
High
5�
35
NA
0
Corn, Silage
Corn, Silage
13.1 Tons
16.1 Tons
143
175
High
Medium
45
55.
0
NA
Small Grain, Silage
Corn, Silage
7.8 Tons
17.1 Tons
NA
NA
Small Grain, Silage
Corn, Silage
7,6 Tons
14.4 Tons
87
J
Medium
1861 Low
841 Low
1571 Low
42
58
NA
NA
41
49
NA
NA
Small Grain, Silage
Small Grain, Silage
6,4 Tons
8.6 Tons
71
Low
95 Medium
35
46
NA
NA
Corn, Silage
Small Grain, Silage
19 Tons
7.6 Tons
207
84
Medium65
Low
41
NA
NA
NA.
Corn, Silage
Small Grain, Silage
17.1 Tons
7.6 Tons
186
84
Low
Low
58
41
NA
NA
Corn, Silage
Corn, Silage
17.1 Tons
17.1 Tone
186
186
Low
Low
58
58
NA
NA
Small Grain, Silage
1
35
29;Q9
MbB2
NA:
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tone
7.8 Tons
84
Low
41
NA
87
Medium
42
NA
Corn, Silage
16.1 Tons
175
Medium
55
NA
28
1.37.
1A2
032
`NA
Hh6. -NA
Corn, Silage
19 Tons
207
Medium
65
NA
Small Grain, Silage
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
10.5 Tons
95
117
Medium
Low
46
57
NA
NA
Corn, Silage
26 Tons
283
Low
88
NA
2/22/2019 2:56:06 PM 214

Planned Crops Summary
GW Bell Dairy
Small Grain, Silage
Corn, Silage
7.6 Tons
17.1 Tons
84
186
Low
Low
41
58
NA
NA
• 28.92'
HhB
NA
4.t
It14
Corn, Silage
17.1 Tons
186
Low
58
NA
Small Grain, Silage
Corn, Silage
7.6 Tons
17.1 Tons
84
186
Low
Low
41
58
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
84
Low
41
NA
NA
NA
NA
Small Grain, Silage
Corn, Silage
7.8 Tonsil 87
16.1 Tons i 175
1 Low‘12
i
55
Low,
NA
1
.:;••••••:'
NA
759
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
84
Lew
41
NA
Corn, Silage
Small Grain, Silage
17.1 Tons
7.6 Tons'
186
84
Lowi 58i
Low
41
NA
NA
Corn, Silage
17.1 Tons
186
Low
58
NA
1
MbB2
MbB2
'04
TtiA
•:.••••••
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
87
Medium
42
NA
Corn, Silage
Fescue Pasture
16.1 Tons
MbS2
•NA
Fescue Pasture
175
Medium
3.8 Tons' 1251 Low
3.8 Tons
125
Low
55
••'••• • -
6
NA
NA
6
NA
Totals:
441.97
419.23
Notes: 1. In the tract column, — symbol means leased, otherwise, owned.
2/22/2019 2:56:06 PM 3 / 4

LI
<2
Planned Crops Summary
GW Bell Dairy
Low potential to contribute to soluble nutrient
leaching below the root zone.
None
>=-• 2 &<= 10
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble nutrient
leaching below the root zone.
> 1 0
APR 0 2 2019
0.127
folaYeir.T1PntitTh
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
High potential to contribute to soluble nutrient
leaching below the root zone.
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation
practices that improve available water holding capacity of soil and
improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples are
Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328),
Long -Term No -Till (778), and edge -of -field practices such as Filter
Strips(393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
0 - 25
26 - 60
61 - 100
> 100
a ting22:-
Low
Medium
High
Very High
No adjustment needed; N based application
No adjustment needed; N based application
Application limited to crop P removal
Starter P application only
2J22/2019 2:56:06 PM 414

Waste Utilization Table
GW Bell Dairy
The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure
or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each
field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure
applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
.
Tract ID
'Field
ID
Source
ID •
,
. SMU :..
Total ....Wettable
Acreage'
Acreage
. Crop Name .
RYE ..:
• Applic..
Period , .
Nitroge€i
PA .
Nutrient
' Req`d-
(Ibs1A)
i ' .•::
:. N..
Comm.
Pert.
Nutrient
Applied
(Ibs&A)
N •
Res.
(lbs/A)
N
Applies
Method •
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(1 s/A)
' N .
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre),
1000
' gal/A
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre) :
tor;.
Liquid ,
Manure
Applied ;
(Field) !
1000 gals
Solid•
.Manure
Applied
(Field),
. tons
1 A
1
S 8
MbB2
9.92
9.71
Corn, Silage
16.1 Tons
2/15-6/30
175
0
0
Broad.
175
26.19
0
254.28
0
1
1
S 8
MbB2
9.92
9.71
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
Broad.
87
13.02
0
126.41
0
2
1
S 8
MbB2
19.13
17.79
Corn, Silage
16.1 Tons
2115-6/30
175
0
0
Broad.
175
26.19
0
465.87
0
2
1
S 8
MbB2
19.13
17.79
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
Broad.
87
13.02
0
231.60
0
3
1
S 8
MbB2
21.30
20.79
Com, Silage
16.1 Tons
2/15-6/30
175
0
0
Broad.
175
26.19
0
544.43
0
3
1
S 8
MbB2
21.30
20.79
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
Broad.
87
13.02
0
270.66
0
4
1
S 8
MbB2
23.49
23.00
Corn, Silage
16.1 Tons
2/16-6/30
175
T
0
0
Broad.
175
26.19
0
602.30
0
4
1
S 8
MbB2
23.49
23.00
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
Broad.
87
13.02
0
299.43
0
5 --
1
S 8
HtC
13.45
13.10
Fescue Hay
3.6 Tons
8/1.7/31
158
0
0
Broad.
158
23.64
0
309.73
0
7 -
1
S 8
HtC
4.01
4.01
Corn, Silage
14.4 Tons
2/15-6/30
157
0
0
Broad.
157
23.49
0
94.21
0
7 -
1
S 8
HtC
4.01
4.01
Small Grain, Silage
6.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
71
0
0
Broad.
71
10.62
0
42.60
0
8
1
S 5
McC2
12.88
12.86
Fescue Pasture
3.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
106
0
0
Broad.
106
0.00
1
23.66
0.00
304.27
2/22/2019 2:59:25 PM 1 / 3

Waste Utilization Table
GW Bell Dairy
9
i
S 8
McC2
14.05
14.05
Small Grain, Silage
6.5 Tons
9/1-3/31 , 72
46
0
Broad.
26
3.84
0
53.95
0;
9
1
S 8
McC2
14.05
14.05
Sorghum -Sudan Pasture
3.5 Tans
3/15-8/31 129
129
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
10
1
S 8
McC2
5.49
5.49
Fescue Pasture
3.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
106
0
0
Broad.
106
15.86
0
87.08
0
11
1
S 8
McC2
11.16
11.10
Fescue Pasture
3.2 Tons
8/1-7/31
106
0
0
Broad.
106
15.86
0
176.07
0
12
1
5 8
McC2
4.80
4.48
Corn, Silage
13.1 Tons
2/15-6/30
143
143
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
12
1
S 8
McC2
4.80
4.48
Small Grain, Silage
6.5 Tons
9/1-3/31
72
72
0
Broad.
0
0.00
0
0.00
0
13
1
S 8
MbB2
7.52
7.52
Com, Silage
16.1 Tons
2/15-6/30
175
0
0
Broad.
175
26.19
0
196.93
0
13
1
S 8
MbB2
7.52
7.52
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
Broad.
4-
87
13.021
0
97.90
0
14 -
1
S 8
HhB
10.13
9.03
Corn, Silage
17.1 Tons
2/15-6/30
186
0
0
Broad.
186
27.83
0
251,33
0
14 -
1
S 8
HhB
10.13
9.03
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
84
0
0
Broad.
84
12.57
0
113.51
0
15 -
1
S 8
HtC
12.26
11.93
Com, Silage
14.4 Tons
2/15-6/30
157
0
0
Broad.
157
23.49
0
280.28
0
15 -
L
1
S 8
HtC
12.26
11.93
Small Grain, Silage
6.4 Tons
9/1-3/31
71
0
0
Broad.
71
10.62
0
126.75
0
17 -
1
S 8
MaB2
36.09
35.66
Corn, Silage
19 Tons
2/15.6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
30.98
0
1,104.59
0
17 -
1
S 8
MaB2
36.09
35.66
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
95
14.22
0
506.94
0
18 -
1
S 8
HhB
7.29
7.29
Corn, Silage
17.1 Tons
2/15-6/30
186
0
0
Broad.
186
27.83
0
202.90
0
18 -
1
S 8
-\HhB
HhB
7.29
7.29
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
84
0
0
Broad.
84
12.57
0
91.63
0
19 -
1
S 8
2.88
2.40
Corn, Silage
17.1 Tons
2/15-6/30
186
0
0
Broad.
186
27.83
0
66.80
0
19 -
1
S 8
HhB
2.88
2.40
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
84
0
0
Broad.
84
12.57
0
30.17
0
20 -
1
S 8
HhB
1.72
1.62
Corn, Silage
17.1 Tons
2/15-6/30
186
0
0
Broad.
186
27.83
0
45.09
0
20 -
1
S 8
HhB
1.72
1.62
Small Grain, Silage
7.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
84
0
0
Broad.
84
12.57
0
20.36
0
23
1
S 8
MbB2
32.35
29.09
Com, Silage
16.1 Tons
2/15-6/30
175
0
0
Broad.
175
26.19
0
761.78
0
23
1
S 8
MbB2
32.35
29.09
J
Small Grain, Silage
7.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
87
0
0
Injec.
87
8.68
0
252.48
01
24 -
1
S 8
MaB2
61.28
61.00
Corn, Silage
19 Tons
2/15-6/30
207
0
0
Broad.
207
30.98
0
1,889.51
0
24 -
1
S 8
MaB2
61.28
61.00
Small Grain, Silage
8.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
95
0
0
Broad.
95
14.22
0
867.17
0
25 -
1
S 8
ToA
10.43
10.42
Com, Silage
26 Tons
2/15-6/30
283
0
0
Broad.
283
42.35
0
441.27
0
2/22/2019 2:59:25 PM 2 / 3

25 ~
1
S 8
ToA
10.43
10.42
Small Gm
26 -
1
S 6
HhB
31.37
31.37
Com, Sila
26 -
1
S 6
HhB
31.37
31.37
Small Gra
27 -
1
S 8
HhB
28.92
28.92
Corn, Silag
27 -
1
S 8
HhB
28.92
28.92
Small Gra
28 -
1
S 8
HhB
8.81
3.55
Corn, Silal
28 -
1
S 8
HhB
8.81
3.55
Small Grai
29 -
1
S 8
MbB2
14.30
14.30
Corn, Si1ac
29 -
1
S 8
MbB2
14.30
14.30
Small Gral
30 -
1
S 8
HhB
10.12
3.18
Corn, Silac
30 -
1
S 8
HhB
10.12
3.18
Small Grai
33 -
1
S 8
HhB
7.59
7.59
Com, Silag
33 -
1
S 8
HhB
7.59
7.59
Small Grai
34
1
S 8
MbB2
5.76
5.10
Corn, Silac
34
1
S 8
MbB2
5.76
5.10
Small Grail
35
1
S 8
MbB2
6.79
6.78
Fescue Pa
36
1
S 8
MbB2
6.68
6.10
Fescue Pa
Waste Utilization Table
GW Bell Dairy
in, Silage 10.5 Tons
ge
17.1 Tons
9/1-3/31
117
0
0
Broad.
117
17.51 0
182.43
2/15-6/30
186
0
0
Broad.
186
27.83 0
873.13
in, Silage
7.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
84
0
0
Broad.
e
17.1 Tons
2/15-6/30
186
0
0
84
12.57 0
394.32
Broad.
186
n, Silage
ie
n, Silage
7.6 Tons
17.1 Tons
9/1-3/31
2/15-6/30
84
186
0
0
7.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
84
0
0
Broad.
Broad.
84
186
27.83 0
804.94
12.57 0
27.83 0
363.52
98.81
0
Broad.
84
12.57 0
44.62
0
0
0
1e
n, Silage
16.1 Tons
7.8 Tons
2/15-6/30
9/1-3/31
e
17.1 Tons
n, Silage
7.6 Tons
215-6/30
9/1-3/31
175
87
0
0
0
0
Broad,
Broad.
175
26.19 0
366.62
0
87
13.02 0
182.26
0
186
0
0
Broad.
186
27.83 0
88.51
0
84
0
0
Broad.
84
1257 0
39.97
0
e
, Silage
17.1 Tons
2/15-6/30
186
0
0
Broad.
186
7.6 Tons
9/1-3/31
84
0
0
Broad.
84
e
16.1 Tons
2/15-6/30
175
0
0
Broad.
175
27.83 0
12.57 0
211.25
0
95.41
0
, Silage
ture
7.8 Tons
3.8 Tons
9/1-3/31
8/1-7/31
87 0
125 0
0
0
Broad.
Broad.
87
125
26.19 0
13.02 0
18.71 0
133.55
0
66.40
126.82
0
0
re
3.8 Tons
8/1-7/31
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 1. Symbol " means user entered data.
125 0 0 Broad.
125
18.71 0
Tote Applied, 1000 gallons
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
Balance, 1000 gallons
Total Applied, tons
114.10
15,092.68
2,767.50
(12,325.18)
0
2f22/2019 2:59:25 PM 3 / 3

Required Soil Test Values
GW Bell Dairy
The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that
should be taken based off information provided at time of soil tests. Fields that receive manure must have a soil
analysis conducted at least once every three years. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant
growth. Alternative crop sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels.
Site fife can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in lbslacre by 0.036 and 0.071,
respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc,
we can predict life of the site for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices, this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each
crop based on the first crop listed on the most recent soil sample. Application of lime at recommended rates is
necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production. If the first crop or rotation changes,
these recommendations may need to be reevaluated to ensure optimal ranges ofr crop production are
maintained.
Tract Id
FfeldID
Craps)
pH
; ,
Lime IRecom.
for Cr4p(s)
t onstac"re)
CuI
• .._.-:: Cop..r
Recommendatt-on:'
zn-l.
::Zino .:
Recommendation .
1
1
Corn silage, Small Grain SG
6.3 T
0, 0
245
0, 0
583
0, 0
2
1
Small Grain (SG), Corn silage
5.6
0.6, 0
232
0, 0
437
0, 0
3
1
Corn silage, Small Grain (SG)
5.7
0.6, 0
223
0, 0
622
0, 0
-1
4
1
Corn silage, Small Grain (SG)
5.5
0.8, 0
213
0, 0
460
0, 0
5
1
Small Grain (SG), Corn silage
6.4
0, 0
121
0, 0
263
0, 0
7
1
Corn silage, Small Grain (SG)
5.6
0.7, 0
126
0, 0
305
0, 0
8
1
FescuelOGrasslTim E,
Fescue/OGrass/Tlm M
5.6
2, 0
181
0, 0
824
0, 0
9
1
FescuelOGrasslrim E,
Fescue/OGrasslTim M
6.4
0.6, 0
193
0, 0
314
0, 0
10
1
Fescue/OGrass/Tim E,
FescuelOGrass/Tim M
5.5
2, 0
138
0, 0
613
0, 0
11
1
Small Grain (SG), Corn silage
5.9
0, 0
248
0, 0
401
0, 0
12
1
Small Grain (SG), Corn silage
5.9
0, 0
248
0, 0
401
0, 0
13
1
Small Grain (SG), Corn silage
5
1.5, 0
197
0, 0
405
0, 0
14
1
Small Grain (SG), Corn silage
5.9
0, 0
51
0, 0
110
0, 0
15
1
Small Grain (SG), Corn silage
5.1
0.8, 0
24
2, $
25
6, $
17
1
Corn silage, SG silage/Soybean
5.2
1.1, 0
97
0, 0
126
0, 0
18
1
Corn silage, SG silage/Soybean
5.7
0.5, 0
107
0, 0
166
0, 0
19
1
Corn silage, SG silage/Soybean
6.1
0, 0
102
0, 0
91
0, 0
20
1
Corn silage, SG silage/Soybean
6.1
0, 0
102
0, 0
91
0, 0
23
1
Small Grain (SG), Corn silage
5.5
0.7, 0
244
0, 0
551
0, 0
24
1
Small Grain (SG), Corn silage
5.6
0.5, 0
83
0, 0
90
0, 0
25
1
Small Grain (SG), Corn silage
6.1
0, 0
153
0, 0
138
0, 0
2/22/2019 3:00:59 PM 1 / 2

Required Soil Test Values
GW Bell Dairy
26
1
Corn silage, Small Grain (SG)
6.8
0.4, 0
70
0, 0
183
0, 0
27
1
Corn silage, Small Grain (SG)
5.8
0.4, 0
70
0, 0
183
0, 0
28
1
Corn silage, SG silage/Soybean
5.8
0.4, 0
71
0, 0
40
0, 0
29
1
Corn silage, SG silage/Soybean
5.6
0.7, 0
65
0, 0
66
0, 0
30
1
Corn silage, SG sllage/Soybean
F 5.7
0.5, 0
48
0, 0
39
0, 0
33
1
Corn silage, Small Grain (SG)
5.9
0, 0
101
0, 0
156
0, 0
34
1
Small Grain (SG), Corn silage
5.6
0.6, 0
252
0, 0
510
0, 0
35
1
Small Grain (SG), Corn silage
6.4
0, 0
175
0, 0
618
0, 0
36
1
Corn silage, Small Grain (SG)
6.6
0, 0
132
0, 0
255
0, 0
Zinc and Conner Toxicity Levels in Solis
Metal
Soil Test Index
Recommended Action
Zn
300
Limit application on peanuts. Maintain soil pH >= 6,0.
600
Cease application on peanut land. Maintain soil pH >= 6.0.
2000
Caution: seek alternative site (all crops). Maintain soil pH >= 6.0.
3000
Cease application (all crops). Maintain soil pH >= 6.0.
Cu
2000
Caution: seek alternative site (all crops). Maintain soil pH >= 6.0.
3000
Cease application (all crops). Maintain soil pH >= 6.0.
2/2212019 3:00:59 PM 2 / 2

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of
the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, storical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations
that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per
year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are
installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical
Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
s. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from
the land application field.

6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied
to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast
provided the application does not occur during a season prone to flooding
(see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate
such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method
which does not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding
should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth.
The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
so, Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates
on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop
planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than
30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
it. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied
from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet
from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995, shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters,
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet

13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainage ways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied
to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied
on grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on
other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a
manner that causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from wash down facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17, A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall
be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees,
shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms
and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,
leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which
will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on
a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.

20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with
no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
zs. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at
least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall
be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to
be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate
than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these metals
approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for optimum
crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept for a minimum
of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall be maintained for a
minimum of three years. Waste application records for all other waste shall
be maintained for five (5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.

oNRCS
Wiliest States Oeparlmertt of Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservation Service
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590
Prepared for: 1 i -) 5 et I rL56:.1;
r f
Farm: Tract(s): Date:. f / (` / 1
By: � - 10,
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT?
Nutrient Management is applying nutrients
from all sources with the right placement, in
the right amount, at the right time, and from
the right source to minimize nutrient losses to
surface and groundwater. This practice is
accomplished through development and
implementation of a Nutrient Management
Plan, which can be part of a broader
Conservation Plan or CNMP that addresses
multiple resource concerns.
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
A nutrient management plan is intended to
accomplish one or more of the following
objectives:
• To budget, supply, and conserve nutrients for
plant production.
• To minimize agricultural nonpoint source
pollution of surface and groundwater
resources.
• To properly utilize manure or organic by-
products as a plant nutrient source.
• To protect air quality by reducing odors,
nitrogen emissions (ammonia, oxides of
nitrogen), and the formation of atmospheric
particulates.
• To maintain or improve the physical, chemical,
and biological condition of soil.
CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT PLAN
The following components are included in
nutrient management plan specifications
typical of more 'traditional'
fertilizer and manure application methods.
When precision ag/variable rate application
technology is utilized, see the next section of
this Job Sheet for additional guidance on plan
requirements.
• aerial site photograph(s)/imagery or site
map(s), and a soil survey map of the site,
• Sufficient soils information —such as dominant
soil map until for each planned field —needed
to apply nutrients at RYE and Soil Test Report
determined rates as appropriate; and to not
exceed rates determined by nutrient risk
assessment planning criteria.
• location of designated sensitive areas and the
associated nutrient application restrictions and
setbacks,
• results of approved risk assessment tools for
any necessary evaluations for nitrogen,
phosphorus, and erosion losses.
• current and/or planned plant production
sequence or rotation,
• soil, water, compost, manure, organic by-
product, and plant tissue sample analyses
applicable to the plan. Where non-NCDA soil
testing labs are used, nutrient
recommendations must be made using NCDA-
similar guidelines and methodologies. Note:
high levels of soil copper and zinc may be toxic
to production crops. Land application of these
nutrients must be accordance with
NCSUINCDA crop toxicity guidelines.
• Realistic yield goals for the crops planned for
nutrient application,
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 1

• Planned nitrogen application rates based on
NC Realistic Yield Expectations (RYEs) or
sufficiently documented yield records,
• The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned
fields,
• Planned P & K application rates based on soil
test results (see next section where P & K
applied through variable rate technology).
• listing and quantification of all nutrient sources
and form, including starter fertilizer
applications and legume -based cover crop
mixes.
• in accordance with the nitrogen and
phosphorus risk assessment tool(s), specify
the recommended nutrient application source,
timing, amount (except for precision/variable
rate applications specify method used to
determine rate), and placement of plant
nutrients for each field or management unit,
and
• guidance for implementation, operation and
maintenance, and recordkeeping as specified
by the CNMP or applicable NC DWQ or
NDPES permit.
Where precision/variable rate nutrient
application applications are planned and
made, some required planning components of
the preceding section may be provided by the
overall conservation plan. In addition, the
following components are required in nutrient
management planning.
The geo-referenced field boundary and data
collected that was processed and analyzed as
a GIS layer or layers to generate nutrient or
soil amendment recommendations.
• Planned nitrogen application rates based on
NC RYEs or sufficiently documented yield
records
• The Nitrogen Leaching Index for planned
fields.
• The nutrient recommendation guidance and
recommendation equations used to convert the
GIS base data layer or layers to a nutrient
source material recommendation GIS layer or
Layers.
• Soil testing documentation that crop
Phosphorus (P205) and Potassium (K20)
nutrient or soil amendment application will be
made per soil test results similar to NCDA
guidelines. Where P & K will not be applied
via variable rate application technology, but by
basic GPS guidance, recommended P & K
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015
rates must be provided as specifications prior
to application.
• Note —where Diammonium phosphate (18-46-
0) is the primary variable rate P fertilizer .
source applied on legume crops, additional N
will likely be needed to achieve RYEs.
The plan was developed based on the current
NRCS 590 standard and Federal, state, or
local regulations or policies. Changes In laws
or regulations may require a plan modification.
This Job Sheet is a required supplement to
the Nutrient Management Plan.
NC Permitted Animal Operations: For NC
DENR-DWR or NPDES permitted animal
operations, the waste utilization portion of the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP) must meet requirements specified by
the Permit. The NC 1217 Interagency Group
provides guidance on the required minimum
elements of a CAWMP. This guidance is found in
Sec 1.1 of the latest 1217 Guidance Document,
located at:
http://www.ncacir.ciov/SWC/tech/quidancedocumen
ts.html.
Nitrogen Leaching Index Values
Nitrogen Leaching Index values. obtained through
use of current Soil Hydrologic GrouolSHG)-based
LI index maps in Sec II of the NC FOTG or RtJSLE
2 field -specific soil loss calculations, are included
in the Nutrient Management Plan. SHGs per soil
map unit are available through selection of the Soil
Data Explorer and Soil Properties and Qualities
(then select °Soil Qualities and Features") tabs
once an Area of Interest has been defined in
NRCS Web Soil Survey.
if ttie Nitrogen Leaching Index > 10 for planned
fields, appropriate conservation practices must be
included in a conservation plan to prevent nitrogen
from leaving the field via surface or subsurface
runoff.
Below are conservation crop management
techniques and practices recommended for
mitigation of nitrate losses (practices also
documented in conservation plan):
page 2

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
DEVELOPMENT
The nutrient management plan has been
developed to meet nutrient application rate criteria
for all sources of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium
as specified by NRCS 590 Nutrient Management
standard criteria.
In addition to NCDA Agronomic Division soil test
recommendations, or soil test recommendations
made through similar guidelines, the plan is based
on NC INMC approved values for realistic yield
goals, nitrogen factors, phosphorus removal rates,
default nutrient values for animal waste, plant
availability coefficients for N, P, and K, and animal
waste generation volumes where applicable.
Approved values are found at:
http://nutriergs.sokncsu.edufindex.htm
Where manure is applied, farm records may also
be used through a procedure provided in SB 1217
Interagency Group guidance, available at:
hftn://www. ncagr qov/SWC/tech/l217committee_'it
mi
For NC permitted animal operations, planning
requirements for Plan "Amendments" (minor
modifications) and "Revisions" (Major
Modifications) are clarified by SB 1217 Interagency
Group Guidance.
ADDITIONAL PHOSPHORUS -RELATED
PLAN INFORMATION (Applicable when
increases in Soil Test P are expected on
the planned area)
In NC, a field -specific Phosphorus Loss
Assessment Tool (PLAT) evaluation is completed
in accordance with 590 Nutrient Management
standard General Criteria requirements, and
phosphorus must be applied in accordance with
590 standard Manure Phosphorus Application
Rates.
In addition to the basic plan components, plan
information on PLAT categorical ratings, P
drawdown strategies, and conservation practices
to reduce P loss risk is required when increases in
Soil Test P are expected on the planned area.
Typically, this could occur when manure is
consistently applied at Nitrogen -based rates. High
levels of phosphorus in the surface soil layer have
been linked to increasing risk of P loss through
surface runoff and leaching.
❑ increases in Soil Test P are expected
on the planned area (not typical if P
application made per soil test results).
PLAT Categorical Ratings Information
When soil test phosphorus continues to increase
on a long term basis, PLAT may produce results
that require P-based manure application planning
and planning for no additional manure P.
Conditions that will require P-based or no-P
planning will be based on site specific resource
conditions, which will facilitate data input into
PLAT. PLAT categorical ratings that will require
enhanced P application planning are:
HIGH: P-based manure application is required
(limited to P uptake in harvested crop biomass)
VERY HIGH: No additional manure P or starter P
application to be specified in nutrient management
plan.
Phosphorus Drawdown Strategy
Information:
Implementation of a phosphorus 'drawdown'
strategy may be a consequence of PLAT results,
or may be requested in order to lower soil test
phosphorus levels.
Should a reduction in soil test P be desired or
necessary, the only currently proven method of
substantial P `drawdown' is to not apply manure -
based P and to plant and harvest crops that utilize
P currently present in the soil surface.
Crop specific estimated annual P removal amounts
are available on the NCSU Nutrient Management
in NC website:
http: //nutri a nts. soil. ncsu.ed ulv field s/i ndex. n hn
Conservation Practices and Management
Techniques to Reduce P Loss Potential:
Conservation practices, especially those that
prevent soil particle detachment and trap sediment
at field edges are effective in preventing
phosphorus movement from the planned site.
Manure application techniques can also be applied
to reduce P loss risk. These practices must be
included in the conservation plan where
determined PLAT risk = HIGH for planned fields.
Consult the conservation plan developed in
conjunction with the nutrient management plan for
information on practices recommended to reduce
phosphorus AND nitrogen loss risks. Application
management techniques to reduce nutrient loss
risk may be prescribed below:
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 3

Long Term Strategy for Reduction of Soil P
Levels:
As noted in the P drawdown strategy section, the
only currently proven method for reducing high
levels of soil P is not applying P, paired with
producing crops on the planned site that use
existing soil P. Where soil P and PLAT
evaluations indicate an increasing risk to water
quality, substantially reducing soil P levels through
crop uptake can take many years of
implementation. When P is not applied, and
existing soil P is used by crops, eventually, soil will
become P deficient. Consult CES or NCDA
Regional Agronomy specialists for additional
information soil test P reduction timelines.
Manure P produced in excess of crop
requirements:
Consult the nutrient management plan for a
quantification of manure generated by the animal
feeding operation that may exceed crop P
requirements.
"Manure Hauler" Information
All manure waste applied on land owned by or
controlled by the Animal Feeding Operation (AFO)
owner or operator must be included in the nutrient
management plan. The volume difference in total
manure waste generated by the AFO and waste
applied to land not owned or controlled by the
producer must be accounted for in a nutrient
management plan.
General information on manure waste generated
by an AFO to be applied to land not owned or
controlled by the AFO owner or operator may be
recorded as specified in the NC CNMP
Certification Sheet and Documentation Checklist or
other supplemental documentation to the nutrient
management plan. NRCS CNMP technical criteria
require documentation of manure exports off the
farm (this can be done below). The AFO
owner/operator should provide the third party
applicator with a current waste analysis in order to
facilitate agronomic crop application of the facility's
generated waste. Should land not owned or
controlled by the AFO owner or operator be
included in a nutrient management plan, the
complete plan must meet 590 criteria.
Type and Quantity of Animal Feeding Operation
(AFO) manure generated by the facility:
Quantity of AFO manure generated to be exported
off the farm for third party application:
RECORDKEEPING
Waste reports from the NCDA & CS Agronomic
Division, or equivalent, are acceptable sources of
information for determining applied manure nutrient
amounts for recordkeeping or crop budgeting
purposes.
Records must be maintained for at least 5 years, or
for time and manner required by Permit for animal
operations to document plan implementation and
maintenance. As applicable, records include:
• soil, plant tissue, water, manure, and
organic by-product analyses resulting in
recommendations for nutrient application,
• quantities, analyses and sources of
nutrients applied,
• dates, and method(s) of nutrient
applications, source of nutrients, and rates
of application,
weather conditions and soil moisture at the
time of application; lapsed time to manure
incorporation; rainfall or irrigation event,
crops planted, planting and harvest dates,
yields, nutrient analyses of harvested
biomass, and crop residues removed,
• dates of plan review, name of reviewer,
and recommended changes resulting from
the review, and
• all enhanced efficiency fertilizer products
used.
Additional records for precision/variable rate
sites must include:
• maps identifying the variable application
source, timing, amount, and placement of
all plant nutrients applied, and
• GPS-based yield maps for crops where
yields can be digitally collected.
• Documentation per field nitrogen
application rates do not exceed RYE -
based recommended rates
• Documentation that applied phosphorus
and potassium recommendations do not
exceed recommended rates specified by
soil tests.
• For non -variable rate application of P & K,
provide applied map with field boundaries
indicating source, timing, method, and rate
of all applications.
• Where 'chlorophyll reader' technology is
utilized, application records that nitrogen
rates match RYE -based N rates as closely
as possible.
•
•
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 4

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
The producer is responsible for safe operation and
maintenance of this practice, including all
equipment. Review the plan periodically to
determine if adjustments or modifications to the
plan are needed. In NC, animal operations
permitting provisions may specify more frequent
review periods. Adhere to the following operation
and maintenance provisions:
• Protect fertilizer and organic by-product
storage facilities from weather and accidental
leakage or spillage.
• Property calibrate application equipment to
ensure uniform distribution of material at
planned rates.
• Workers should be protected from and avoid
unnecessary contact with inorganic fertilizers
and organic by-products. Extra caution must
be taken when handling ammonia sources of
nutrients, or when dealing with organic wastes
stored in unventilated enclosures.
• The disposal of material generated by the
cleaning of nutrient application equipment
should be accomplished properly. Excess
material should be collected and stored or field
applied in an appropriate manner. Excess
material should not be applied on areas of high
potential risk for runoff or leaching.
• Disposal or recycling of nutrient containers
should be done according to state and local
guidelines or regulations.
NC-590 Job Sheet May 2015 page 5

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ .70//-- Z35- ?/o7
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 10u -LPN — 19 )1
SWCD '7e-4-U7/ --023S e.� 'f; 3'
NRCS It
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at the
facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
1 December 18, 1996

D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to flowing
leaks- possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put in a
submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes and
compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom as soon
as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office;
Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call
should include: your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item
2 above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the
spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken,
and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS Phone number -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - - , and
local NRCS office for advice/teclmical assistance phone number - - .
2 December 18, 1996

4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site damage.
a. Contractors Name: c 5
b. Contractors Address:
c. Contractors Phone: 7./ 1 2 — y . 97
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.)
a. Name:, 44ln
b. Phone: _ _ F_Z - Lf 7 f1 t -7e7g
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems with
release of wastes from happening again.
3 December 18, 1996

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source
Cause BMPs to Control Insects
Liquid Systems
Flush gutters
Site Specific Practices
• Accumulation of solids O Flush system is designed and operated sufficiently
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as
designed
0 Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
,discharsre
Lagoons and pits • Crusted solids
E ' Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative • Decaying vegetation
growth
:fit' Maintain vegetative control along banks of
lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
' Dry Systems
Feeders • Feed spillage Design, operate, and maintain feed systems
(e.g., bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
� jaccumulation of decaying wastage
C' Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7- to 10-
day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day interval
during winter)
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page 1

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects
Feed storage • Accumulations of feed CI' Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
,products)
5 Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed
Animal holding areas . Accumulations of animal [Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along fences
wastes and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
��d�isturbance by animals is minimal
C�I'Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed)
Site Specific Practices
Dry manure handling • Accumulations of animal C] Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
systems wastes 7- to 10-day interval during summer; 15- to 30-day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
Iand application or disposal
Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
0 Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page 2

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source
Farmstead
Cause
• Dairy production
BMPs to Minimize Odor
0 Vegetative or wooded buffers
0-'Recommended best management practices
Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or bam • Wet manure -covered
alley surfaces
surfaces
Bedded areas • Urine
• Partial microbial
decomposition
Manure dry stacks • Partial microbial
decomposition
Site Specific Practices
Scrape or flush daily
alromote drying with proper ventilation
'Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Promote drying with proper ventilation
Er Replace wet or manure -covered bedding
O Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
Storage tank or
basin surface
Settling basin
surfaces
• Partial microbial
decomposition
• Mixing while filling
• Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry, or
sludge spreader
outlets
• Partial microbial
decomposition
• Mixing while filling
• Agitation when emptying
• Agitation when spreading
• Volatile gas emissions
April 18, 2006, page 1
O Bottom or mid -level loading
O Tank covers
O Basin surface mats of solids
O Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
O Agitate only prior to manure removal
O Proven biological additives or oxidants
O Liquid drainage from settled solids
O Remove solids regularly
0" it injection of slurry/sludges
Wash residual manure from spreader after use
Proven biological additives or oxidants

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source
Uncovered manure,
slurry, or sludge on
field surfaces
Flush tanks
Cause
• Volatile gas emissions while
Ong
BMPs to Minimize Odor
® Soil injection of slurry/sludges
O Soil incorporation within 48 hours
O Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
O Proven biological additives or oxidants
Site Specific Practices
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
liquid while tanks are filling
Outside drain
collection or junction
boxes
• Agitation during wastewater
conveyance
Lift stations
O Flush tank covers
CO Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
© Box covers
• Agitation during sump tank
filling and drawdown
End of drainpipes at
lagoon
CD Sump tank covers
• Agitation during wastewater
conveyance
O Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces
• Volatile gas emission
• Biological mixing
• Agitation
0(Proper lagoon liquid capacity
GI Correct lagoon startup procedures
O Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio
0 Minimum agitation when pumping
Mechanical aeration
® Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler
nozzles
• High pressure agitation
• Wind drift
O Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
® Minimum recommended operating procedure
® Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
O Pump from second -stage lagoon
© Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings
April 18, 2006, page 2

Cattle Farm Waste Management Odor Control Checklist
Source
Dead animals
Cause
• Carcass decomposition
Standing water
around facilities
• Improper drainage
• Microbial decomposition of
organic matter
Mud tracked onto • Poorly maintained access
public roads from roads
farm access
BMPs to Minimize Odor
f ` Proper disposition of carcasses
a -trade and landscape such that water drains away
from facilities
'Farm access road maintenance
Site Specific Practices
Additional Information:
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 RuleBMP Packet
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System —Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory; EBAE 209-95
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment EBAE Fact Sheet
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
April 18, 2006, page 3
Available From :
NCSU, County Extension Center
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
Florida Cooperative Extension

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
❑ Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
❑ Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
❑ Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
ttd '(
December 18, 1996

rarntun nranogurn •nr Acres
1 9.92 SG Silage/ Corn Silage
Z 19.13 SG Silage/ Corn Silage
3 21.3 SG Silage/ Corn Silage
4 23.49 SG Silage./ Corn Silage
13.45 Fescue Hay
7 4.01 SG Siege/ Corn Silage
8 12.88-Pasture
9 14.05 Small Grain Silage/ Sudax graze
10 5.49 Pasture
11 11.16 Pasture
12 4.8 SG Silage/ Corn 'age
13 7.52 5G Silage/ Corn Silage
14 10.13. SG Silage/ Corn Silage
15 12.26 SG Silage/Corn Silage
17 36.09 SG Silage/ Corn Silage
13 7.29 SG Silage/ Corn Silage
19 2.88 SG Stage/ Corn Silage
20 1.72 SG Silage/ Corn Silage.
23 32.35 SG Silage/ Corn Silage
24 61.28 SG Silage/ Corn Silage
25 10.43 SG Silage/ Corn Silage
26 , 31.37 SG Silage/ Corn Silage
27 28.92 SO Silage/ Corn Silage
28 3.55 SG Silage/ Corn Silage
28 4.26 SG Silage/Corn Silage
29 14.3 SG Silage/Corn Silage
30 6.41 SG -Silage/ Corn Silage
30 3.71 SG Silage/Corn Silage .
33 7.59 SG Silage/ Corn Silage
34 5.76 SG Silage/ Corn Silage
35 6.79 Pasture
26 8.68 Pasture
Roads
n Management Units
GW Bell Dairy: Waste Management Units
r/0
01.
Miles
9/4'18
Assisted By Cleveland SWCO
Contours and 2012 Aerial Photo from NRCS
Parcel Lines from Cleveland Co. Gov

1 9.92 9.713652
2 19.13 17.79082
3 21.3 20.79152
4 23.49 22.62986
5 13.45 13.45335
34 5.76 5.102551
7 4.01 4.01009
8 12.88 12.87533
9 14.05 14.05389
10 5.49 5.489845
11 11.16 11.15606
12 4.8 4.482496
13 7.52 7.52474
14 10.13 9.033878
15 12.26 11.93667
17 36.09 35.66008
18 7.29 7.285355
19 2.88 2.397411
20 1.72 1.629185
23 32.35 29.0946
24 61.28 61.00665
25 10.43 10.42577
26 31.37 31.37275
27 28.92 28.91798
28 3.55 3.074679
30 6.41 6.359655
33 7.59 7.591267
35 6.79 6.786186
36 6.68 6.109742
29 14.3 13.22948
28 4.26 3.079707
30 3.71 3.188669
GW Bell Dairy: Wettable Acres
0
0.25
0.5
9/4/18
Assisted By Cleveland SWCD
Contours and 2012 Aerial Photo from NRCS
Parcel Lines from Cleveland Co. Gov
1
Mil.-•:.

rh "
Manaus PLA tinq
Medium
2 Medium
3 Medium
4 Medium
5 Low
7 Low
8 Medium
9 High
10 Medium
11 Low
12 High
13 Medium
14 Low
15 Low
17 Medium
18 Low
19 Low
20 Low
23 Medium
24 Medium
25 Low
26 Low
27 Low
28 Low
28 Low
29. Low
30 Low
30 Low
33 Low
34'Medium
35 Low
36 Low
t�pye�15
Gary Seam
RoIlingl)rook
Green Meadows
Branch wood
Roads
Management Units
PLAT Rating
11. High
Iggir Low
Medium
No Name
Long Creek•Rd
a:
0
GW Bell Dairy: Phosphorus Loss Rating
0.25
0.5
9/4l18
Assisted By Cleveland SWCD
Contours and 2012 Aerial Photo from NRCS
Parcel Lines from Cleveland Co Gov
1
Miles

USDA United States
Department crf
Agriculture Cleveland County, North Carolina
f z 7 3-.5
Farm 5700
Tract 13119
2018 Program Year
CM
MB 33.0• itM
6
9.49
HEL
HEL
Crop
24
2.4
UH EL
Noncropland
26
12.48
UH EL
Non cro
land
Page Cropland Total: 74.72 acres
Map Created September 07, 2017
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non -Cropland
Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
Restricted Use
V Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership; rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producerand/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data 'as is' and assumes all risks associated with Its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage Incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland Identifiers do not represent the size, shape, or specific determination of The area. Referlo your original detemn ination (CPA-026 and attached maps) for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States
rre°'AgCleveland County, North Carolina
Feet
USDA FSA maps are for F SA Program administration only. This map riots not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership: rather it depicts the Information provided directly from the produce rand/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data as is' and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs,
Welland Identifiers do not represent the size, shape, or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determnation (CPA-026 and attached maps) for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.
Noncropland
Page Cropland Total: 50.78 acres
Farm 7836
Tract 3147
2018 Program Year
CLU
Acres
HEL
Crop
1
21.69
UHEL
2
3.45
UHEL
3
8.3
UHEL
4
1.59
UHEL
5
10.4
UHEL
6
5.35
HEL
7
31.23 UHEL
Map Created September 07, 2017
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non -Cropland
CZITract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
• Restricted Use
✓ Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
▪ Compliance Provisions

USDA
United States
graIturure Cent of l
Agriculture eveland County, North Carolina
A
so;\ 6a�•�\� -!L4
Farm 4754
Tract 12628
2018 Program Year
CLU Acres HEL
HEL
1
65.99
Crop
7
112.7
UHEL
Noncropland
9
13.53
NHEL
Page Cropland Total: 79.52 acres
Map Created September 07, 2017
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non -Cropland
Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
al Restricted Use
V Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership; rather it depicts the information provided dFectly from the producer and/or the NAIP Imagery. The producer
acrnpts the data 'as is' and assumes all risks associated with ns use. The USDA Faln1 Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifiers do not represent the size, shape, or specific determination of the area. Retorts) your original determination (CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
Cleveland County, North Carolina
175 350 ;' . T00 .
Feet
Farm 7844
Tract 14744
2017 Program Year
[Eu Acres HEL Crop
1
6.87
0.69
MEL
UH EL
Noncropland
Page Cropland Total: 6.87 acres
Map Created September 08, 2017
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non -Cropland
'ilTract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
0 Restricted Use
V Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
El Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership; rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data 'as Is and assumes all risks associated with Its use. The USDA Farm Semi ceAgency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs,
Wetland identifiers do not represent the size, shape, or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determination (CPA-026 and attached maps) for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
Cleveland County, North Carolina
Farm 7844
Tract 14742
2017 Program Year
CLiJ
Acres
HEL I crop
1
8.99
HEL I
8 10.64 UHEL Noncropland
Page Cropland Total: 8.99 acres
Map Created September 08.2017
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non -Cropland
Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination identifiers
• Restricted Use
V Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
• Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not representa legal surveyorreflect actual ownership; rather It depicts the information provided directly from the producerandlor the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data 'as is' and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsiblity for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifiers do not represent the size, shape. or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determination (CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact MRCS.

USDAUnited states
Department of
Agriculture Cleveland County, North Carolina
Agri
Sc.% I '5 ckm? IS 2 7 L C�
Farm 2015
Tract 3485
2018 Program Year
CLU
Acres
HEL
Crop
1
6.17
UHEL
2
2.04
NHEL
3
29.44
UHEL
4
2.05
UHEL
6
1.38
UHEL
7
8
9
0.05
26.27
15.06
UHEL
UHEL
UHEL
Noncropland
Noncropland
Noncropland
10
7.49
UHEL
Page Cropland Total: 48.57 acres
Map Created September 07, 2017
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non -Cropland
Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
0, Restricted Use
7 Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey orreflectactual ownership; rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer andlorthe NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data 'as Is' and assumes all risks associated with Its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifiers do not represent the size, shape, or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determination (CPA-026 and attached maps}for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States
Department of
MIME Agriculture Cleveland County, North Carolina
USDA
• " 7...Atrt
SA maps are for FSA Program ad m ingslratbn only. ThS map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership; rather It depicts the information provided directly from the pro,
Farm 7840
Tract 12537
2018 Program Year
CLU
Acres
HEL
Crop
2
0.42
UHEL
3
3.85
UHEL
4
2.31
HEL
5
6
0.38
1.41
UHEL
UH EL
Noncropland
Noncropland
Page Cropland Total: 6.58 acres
Map Created September 07, 2017
Base Image Layer flown in 2018
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non -Cropland
Tract Boundary
LIE911.6.
Wetland Determination Identifiers
0 Restricted Use
V Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
22 Compliance Provisions
ucer andrer the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data 'as is and assumes a risks associated with its use. The uSDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
WeJand identifiers do not represent the SCO. shape, or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determination (CPA-026 and attached maps)for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture Cleveland County, North Carolina
5,6;okc LP
isq 7 f
Farm 4762
Tract 12538
2018 Program Year
CLU
Acres
HEL
Crop
1
0.75
UHEL
2
4.23
HEL
3
10.5
UH EL
4
4,08
UH EL
5
8.78
UH EL
6
1.61
UH EL
7
8.64
UH EL
8
4.62
UHEL
9
0.76
UH EL
10
2.67
UH EL
11
4.47
UHEL
12
13-
0.67
1.2
UHEL
UH EL
Noncropland
14
25.76 UH EL Noncropland
Page Cropland Total: 52.31 acres
Map Created September 07, 2017
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non -Cropland
C:3Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
• Restricted Use
V Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
Compliance Provisions
USDA FSA maps are for ESA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership; rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data 'as isand assumes all risks associated with Its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage Incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifiers do not represent the size, shape, or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determination (CPA-026 and attached maps) for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.

USA United States
�rt Department of
Agriculture
Cleveland County, North Carolina
57 9
_. � �'. ,,. :, M. ;�r ::"_ '+�•eet
4,, :• r 4• +R%, " `s R 0. i,, Ire. , +eRiy
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map does not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership; rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producerand/orthe NAIP Imagery. The producer
accepts the data 'as is' and assumes all risks associated with its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage incurred as a result of any users reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifiers do not represent the size. shape, or specific determination of the area. Refer to your original determination (CPA-02S and attached maps) for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS,
Farm 4763
Tract 12539
2018 Program Year
CLU
Acres
HEL
Crop
1
2.87
HEL
2
1.04
UHEL ,
Noncropland
Page Cropland Total: 2.87 acres
Map Created September 07, 2017
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non -Cropland
Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
0 Restricted Use
V Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
IS Compliance Provisions

USDA United States
y Department of
Agriculture
Cleveland County, North Carolina
USDA FSA maps are for FSA Program administration only. This map dons not represent a legal survey or reflect actual ownership; rather it depicts the information provided directly from the producer and/or the NAIP imagery. The producer
accepts the data 'as Is' and assumes all risks associated with Its use. The USDA Farm Service Agency assumes no responsibility for actual or consequential damage Incurred as a result of any user's reliance on this data outside FSA Programs.
Wetland identifiers do not represent the size, shape, or specific determination of the area. Referto your original determination (CPA-026 and attached maps) for exact boundaries and determinations or contact NRCS.
Noncropland
Noncropland
Page Cropland Total: 30.06 acres
Farm 7237
Tract 3306
2018 Program Year
CLU
Acres
HEL
Crop
1
5.69
HEL
2
24.37
HEL
3
4
2.39
1.33
UHEL
UHEL
Map Created September 07,2017
Base Image Layer flown in 2016
Common Land Unit
Cropland
Non -Cropland
Tract Boundary
Wetland Determination Identifiers
• Restricted Use
V Limited Restrictions
Exempt from Conservation
111 Compliance Provisions

Primary Secondary
Version —November 26, 2018
Mortality Management Methods
Indicate which method(s) will be implemented.
When selecting multiple methods indicate a primary versus secondary option.
Methods other than those listed must be approved by the State Veterinarian.
Routine Mortality
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours of knowledge of animal
death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water
(G.S.106-403). The bottom of the burial pit should be at least one foot above the seasonal
high water table. Attach burial location map and plan.
Landfill at municipal solid waste facility permitted by NC DEQ under GS 15A NCAC
13B .0200.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7.
Complete incineration according to 02 NCAC 52C .0102.
A composting system approved and permitted by the NC Department of Agriculture & Con-
sumer Services Veterinary Division (attach copy of permit). If compost is distributed off -farm,
additional requirements must be met and a permit is required from NC DEQ.
In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the
NC Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services (G.S. 106-549.70).
Any method which, in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian, would make possible
the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health.
(Written approval by the State Veterinarian must be attached).
Mass Mortality Plan
Mass mortality plans are required for farms covered by an NPDES permit. These plans are
also recommended for all animal operations. This plan outlines farm -specific mortality man-
agement methods to be used for mass mortality. The NCDA&CS Veterinary Division sup-
ports a variety of emergency mortality disposal options; contact the Division for guidance.
• A catastrophic mortality disposal plan is part of the facility's CAWMP and is activated
when numbers of dead animals exceed normal mortality rates as specified by the State
Veterinarian.
• Burial must be done in accordance with NC General Statutes and NCDA&CS Veterinary
Division regulations and guidance.
• Mass burial sites are subject to additional permit conditions (refer to facility's animal
waste management system permit).
• In the event of imminent threat of a disease emergency, the State Veterinarian may enact
additional temporary procedures or measures for disposal according to G.S. 106-399.4.
3/2c/
Signar, of Farm Owner/Manager Date
J2_ 7 z.o)
Signature of Technical Spe ialist Date

JON... 'Nor
Site of Burial for secondary mortality management
- Ih

Operations and Maintenance Plan
System Overview
l3 %'' ,7// ,-,
.. �r -7 %fY //
1;eire
This Animal Waste Management Plan consists of the following major
components:
1. Waste Storage Ponds
2. Gravity Flow Channel and Pipe
3. Clean Water Runoff Control System
4. Waste Hauling and Spreading
and the following associated components:
5. Push Off Ramps
6. Automatic Free -stall Barn Scrapes
7. Concrete Curbing
8. Critical Area Planting
All manure and urine from the two free -stall barns housing the
300 milk cows and associated concrete walkways will be stored in
the upper waste storage pond. In addition, contaminated surface
runoff from concrete areas not roofed and milk parlor washwater
will enter the upper waste storage pond. It has been determined
that this pond will be adequate for 90 days storage for 300 milk
cows.
All manure and urine from the heifer/calf barn and associated
concrete lot will be stored in the lower waste storage pond. In
addition contaminated surface runoff from the concrete lot
associated with the heifer/calf barn will enter the lower waste
storage pond. It has been determined that this pond will be
adequate for 180 days storage for 150 heifers/calves.
This Animal Waste Management System is designed to prevent
discharge of animal waste contaminants to surface water from the
twenty-five (25) year, twenty-four (24) hour storm, as required
under the non -discharge regulations.
1. WASTE STORAGE PONDS
The capacity of the waste storage pond should be
maintained by properly agitating the slurry prior to
emptying and application to the fields. Inadequate
agitation will result in the accumulation of solids which
will reduce the usable capacity to a point that some form of
dredging could be required.
The waste storage ponds shall be kept free of debris,
trash and used veterinary supplies. Domestic or industrial
waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc. shall not be discharged into the waste storage ponds.
Vegetation on the dams should be inspected periodically.
Areas without grass shall be reseeded and properly
maintained. The dam should be mowed at least annually to
prevent woody growth. Mowing operations must take place
only when the soil of the dam is dry and vegetation should
not be mowed to a height of less than four (4) inches at any
time. See "Critical Area Planting" for further maintenance

Page 2
requirements. Periodically check the dams for erosion,
rodent damage, or seepage. Any evidence of sloughing or
seepage should be reported to the Cleveland Soil and Water
Conservation District office.
The twenty-five (25) year - twenty-four (24) hour storage
capacity, freeboard, and emergency spillway shall be
maintained as specified in the plan.
The six inch (6) PVC pipe used for pumping the manure
from the lower waste storage pond to the upper waste storage
pond should be inspected every three months. The dam around
the pipe should be inspected for any cracks, holes,
sloughing, or any other problems effecting the integrity of
the dam. If any problems are observed the Cleveland Soil
and Water Conservation District should be notified
immediately.
2. GRAVITY FLOW CHANNEL AND PIPE
Inspect the gravity flow channel and pipe periodically to
assure proper function. Insure the animal waste is entering
the channel and flowing to the waste storage pond properly.
Inspect the concrete for cracks and flaking and repair as
necessary. Remove any debris or trash from channel or pit.
3. Clean Water Runoff System
Pipe, berms, and channels shall be maintained to properly
function in preventing clean water runoff from entering the
waste storage ponds and to convey the runoff safely below
the barns and lot area. Keep pipes open for maximum flow
potential. Inspect rock channels periodically for any
erosion taking place within and beside the channels.
Reposition any rocks that have been displaced from runoff
Control weeds in the channel. Maintain vegetated areas to
prevent sediment and erosion.
4. Waste Hauling and Spreading
Maintain spreader tanks so they properly haul and spread
manure. Gauge application rates to match waste utilization
plan. Repair any ruts at waste storage pond caused by
loading or any ruts in field from spreading. Avoid spillage
from tanks while loading and hauling.
5. Push Off Ramps
Push off ramps are being utilized at the old free -stall
barn into the upper waste storage pond and from the
heifer/calf barn into the lower waste storage pond. These
ramps were installed without NRCS technical assistance.
Inspect ramps periodically for structural integrity. Any
cracks, undermining, unusual movement or vibration, or any
other observations of possible damage or potential failure
should warrant their discontinued use until they can be
evaluated by an engineer.
Keep ramps free of debris and trash. Use tractor
equipment near the ramps with caution.

Page 3
6. Automatic Free -stall Scrapes
Automatic scrapes will be utilized in the free -stall
barns. Inspect equipment regularly. Assure that scrapes
are properly depositing manure in the waste storage pond or
gravity flow channel.
7. Concrete Curbing
Concrete curbs will be used along walkways and sides of
free -stall barns to confine the animal waste so it can be
scraped into the waste storage ponds. Inspect the concrete
periodically for any major cracks or breakage.
8. Critical Area Planting
Keep dams, channels, and any exposed soil in a permanent
vegetation. Seed or reseed area where desired sod is weak
or not evident. Fertilize and lime as specified or by soil
samples. Vegetated areas should be mowed at least annually.
Mowing operations should take place when the soil is dry.
The vegetation should not be mowed to a height less than
four inches.

Pe5/5,,-
Page 4
7/3e/ts s Rwr7.5
H. Odor and Insect Control
Follow the indicated Best Management Practices
(BMP's) on the provided Odor Control and Insect
Control Checklist.
I. Mortality Management Methods
The enclosed sheet indicates which mortality
management method is being used.
III. Existing Upper Waste Storage Pond For Polluted Runoff,
Milking Parlor Wash Water, and Manure
A. Design volumes 300 - 1,400 pound cows 100%
confinement - 90 day period
Month
JAN.
FEB.
MAR.
APR.
MAY
JUN.
JUL.
AUG.
SEP.
OCT.
NOV.
DEC.
Yr. Total
In.
Normal
Rainfall
3.89
4.18
4.69
3.51
3.99
3.93
4.82
4.46
3.42
3.48
3.15
3.90
47.42
Cleveland County
Surface
Runoff
Depth
53 2.06 20
57 2.38 25
57 2.67 24
59 2.07 26
58 2.31 24
60 2.36 27
60 2.89 27
61 2.72 31
67 2.29 33
62 2.16 30
59 1.86 26
59 2.30 24
28.07
Unsurface
Runoff
Depth
0.78
1.05
1.13
0.91
0.96
1.06
1.30
1.38
1.13
1.04
0.82
0.94
12.50
In.
Normal
Evap.
1.3
1.4
3.1
3.6
4.3
5.0
5.0
4.2
3.4
2.4
1.7
1.6
37.0
Rainfall
Minus Evap.
2.59
2.78
1.59
- .09
- .31
- 1.07
- .18
.26
.02
1.08
1.45
2.30
10.42
1. Normal Runoff for 90 Day Period
Drainage Area - surface lot 7,000 sq. ft.
Dec. - Feb. = 6.74 inches = .56 ft.
7,000 sq. ft. x .56 ft. = 3,920 cu. ft.
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
Dec. - Feb. = 7.67 inches = .6 ft.
3. 25 year -
CN
Rainfall
Runoff
.45 feet
4. 25 year -
Rainfall
24
x
hour surface runoff 7,000 sq. ft.
95
6 inches
5.41 inches = .45 feet
7,000 sq. ft. = 3,150 cu. ft.
24 hour rainfall
= 6.0 inches
5. Freeboard = 1.0 feet
on pond surface
• .5 feet

Page 5
6. Manure/Urine produced
14.6 gallons/day/cow
300 cows x 14.6 gallons x 90 days = 394,200
gallons
394,200 gallons = 7.48 gallons per cu. ft. =
52,700 cu. ft.
7. Milkroom and parlor washwater
5 gallons/day/cow
300 cows x 5 gallons x 90 days = 135,000
gallons
135,000 gallons - 7.48 gallons per cu. ft. =
18,048 cu. ft.
B. Summary of Design Volume - Upper Waste Storage Pond
- 90 Day Period
1. Normal surface runoff 3,920 cu. ft.
2. 25 year-24 hour surface runoff 3,150 cu. ft.
3. Manure/Urine 52,700 cu. ft.
4. Milkroom, parlor washwater 18,048 cu. ft.
Total 77,818 cu. ft.
5. Normal rainfall - evap. on pond 0.6 ft.
6. 25 year-24 hour rainfall on pond 0.5 ft.
7. Freeboard 1.0 ft.
Total 2.1 ft.
C. Sizing Existing Upper Waste Storage Pond
Top dam elev.
Crest spillway elev.
Avg. bottom elev.
Surface area top dam
Surface area 2.1 ft. below top dam
Bottom area
Volume to top dam (see NC-ENG-14)
Volume to 2.1 feet below top dam
(see NC-ENG-14)
89.9
88.9
81.4
20,430 sq. ft.
17,407 sq. ft.
9,514 sq. ft.
124,270 cu. ft.
84,767, cu.ft.
Maximum storage level from top dam
1.0 ft. freeboard
0.5 ft. 25 year-24 hour storm on pond
0.2 ft. 25 year-24 hour storm surface runoff - 3,150
cu. ft. _ 17,407 sq. ft. = .18 ft.
Use .2 ft.
1.7 ft.
Volume available to 1.7 ft. below top dam (see NC-ENG-
14) 91,969 cu. ft.
Volume needed - 90 day storage
1. Normal surface runoff 3,920 cu. ft.
2. Manure/Urine 52,700 cu. ft.
3. Milkroom, parlor washwater 18,048 cu. ft.
4. Normal rainfall - evap. on pond
0.6 ft. x 20,430 sq. ft. 12,258 cu. ft.
Total 86,926 cu. ft.

Page 6
D. Pump Out Elevation and Quantities
The upper waste storage pond should be pumped before
the liquid level reaches the 25 year-24 hour storage
volume. The elevation is 88.2 or 1.7 feet below top of
dam (0.7 ft. below emergency spillway). A highly
visible marker will be set to mark this elevation.
The upper waste storage pond will store about 90
days of runoff, manure, and milkroom/parlor washwater.
Every 90 days an estimated 86,926 cu. ft. or 650,206
gallons will be stored. With a tank holding 3,000
gallons this would mean approximately 217 trips every
90 days or 868 trips per year to empty the upper waste
storage pond.
IV. Existing Lower Waste Storage Pond For Polluted Runoff and
Manure
A. Acceptance of Existing Lower Waste Storage Pond
This dam was constructed by the landowner
approximately six years ago without technical
assistance from the Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS). The dam does not meet NRCS minimum
standards for waste storage pond embankments. From
observations done on site, there was no visible
evidence that the embankment was unstable nor was any
seepage evident from the structure. Present NC .0200
regulations will allow the technical specialist to
accept existing dams under these conditions.
A hazard classification was made and it was
determined the hazard is low from a sudden failure.
NRCS assumes no responsibility for the existing
embankment and is providing no certification that the
embankment meets the N. C. Dam Safety Law of 1967.
B. Design Volumes - 150 heifers/calves averaging 675
pounds - 100% confinement
1. Normal runoff for 180 day period
Drainage area, surface lot - 2,579 sq. ft.
Oct. - Mar. = 13.43 inches = 1.1 feet
2,579 sq. ft. x 1.1 ft. = 2,837 cu. ft.
2. Rainfall - evaporation on pond surface
Oct. - Mar. = 11.79 inches = 1.0 feet
3. 25 year-24 hour surface runoff - 2,579 sq. ft.
CN = 95
Rainfall = 6 inches
Runoff = 5.41 .eet►"C= .45 feet
.45 ft. x 2,579 sq. ft. = 1,161 cu. ft.
4. 25 year-24 hour rainfall on pond surface
Rainfall = 6 inches = 0.5 feet
5. Freeboard = 1.0 feet
6. Manure/Urine produced
7.0 gallons/day/cow
150 cows x 7.0 gallons x 180 days = 189,000
gallons
189,000 gallons = 7.48 gallons/cu. ft. =
25,267 cu. ft.

C. Summary of Design Volume Lower Waste
- 180 Day Period
1. Normal surface runoff
2. 25 year-24 hour surface runoff
3. Manure/Urine
Total
4. Normal rainfall - evap. on pond
5. 25 year-24 hour rainfall on pond
6. Freeboard
Total
D. Sizing Existing Lower Waste Storage
Est. surface area to top of dam
Est. surface area 2.5 ft. below top
Est. depth
Volume to top dam (see NC-ENG-14)
Volume to 2.5 ft. below top dam
(see NC-ENG-14)
Page 7
Storage Pond
2,837
1,161
25,265
29,265
cu.
cu.
cu.
cu.
1.0 ft.
0.5 ft.
1.0 ft.
2.5 ft.
Pond
7,708
dam 6,132
14
57,638
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
ft.
cu. ft.
39,989 cu. ft.
Maximum storage level from top dam
1.0 ft. freeboard
0.5 ft. 25 year-24 hour storm on pond
0.2 ft. 25 year-24 hour storm surface runoff 1,161
cu. ft.- 6,132 sq. ft. = .19 ft. Use .2 ft.
1.7 ft.
Volume available to 1.7 ft. below top
ENG-14)
Volume needed - 180 day storage
1. Normal surface runoff
2. Manure/Urine
3. Normal rainfall - evap. on pond
1.0 ft. x 7,708 sq. ft.
Total
dam (see NC-
45,535 cu. ft.
2,837 cu. ft.
25,267 cu. ft.
7,708 cu. ft.
35,812 cu. ft.
E. Pump Out Elevation and Quantities
The lower waste storage pond should be pumped before
the liquid level reaches the 25 year - 24 hour storage
volume. This elevation is 78.0 or 1.7 ft. below top of
dam. A highly visible marker will be set to mark this
elevation. The lower waste storage pond will store in
excess of 6 months of runoff and manure. Every 6
months an estimated 35,812 cu. ft. or 267,874 gallons
will be stored. To best match the crop needs the pond
will be emptied 3 times per year with 3 months storage
for 2 pump -outs and 6 months storage for the other.
With a tank holding 3,000 gallons this would mean
approximately 89 trips every 6 months or 178 trips per
year to empty the lower waste storage pond.