190020_Permit Renewal Application 2019_20190410

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Animal Waste Management Systems
Request for Certification of Coverage
Facility Currently covered by an Expiring Sate Non-Discharge General Pennit
On September 30, 2019, the North Carolina State Non-Discharge General Permits for Animal Waste Management Systems will
expire. As required by these permits, facilities that have been issued Certificates of Coverage to operate under these State
Non-Discharge General Permits must apply for renewal at least 180 days prior to their expiration date. Therefore, all applications
must be received by the Division of Water Resources by no later than April 3,2019.
Please do not leave any question unanswered Please verify all information and make any necessary corrections below.
Application must be signed and dated by the Permittee.
1. Farm Number: 19-0020 Certificate Of Coverage Number: AWC 190020
2. Facility Name: Crawford Da*
3. Landowner's Name(same as on the Waste Management Plan): Jerry W Crawford
4. Landowner's Mailing Address: 4085 Crawford Da0 Rd
State: NC Zip: 27516-5088
City: C�a�el Hill al �j ��� j
Telephone Number: - J 1 1 E-mail: d�� '� a,� V 1 a ftn
5. Facility's Physical Address: 4085 Crawford Dai Rd
City: Chanel Hill
State: NC Zip: 27516
6. County where Facility is located: Chatham
7. Farm Manager's Name(if different from Landowner):
8. Farm Manager's telephone number(include area code):
9. Integrator's Name(if there is not an Integrator,write"None"): /ry`(� g
10. Operator Name(OIC): Jerry W.Crawford
Phone No.: Lgt OIC#: 20938
11. Lessee's Name(if there is not a Lessee,write"None"):
12. Indicate animal operation type and number:
Current Permit: Operations Type Allowable Count
Cattle-Milk Cow 177
Operation Types:
Cattle Dry Poultry Other T►nes
Swine Wean to Finish Dairy Calf Non Laying Chickens Horses Horses
Wean to Feeder n'
Dai Heifer Laying Chickens Horses-Other
Shee Shee
Farrow to Finish Milk Cow Pullets p- p
s Sheep-Other
Feeder to Finish Dry Cow Turkeys
Farrow to Wean Beef Stocker Calf Turkey Pullet
Farrow to Feeder Beef Feeder
Boar/Stud Beef Broad Cow Wet Pouf
Gilts Other Non Laying Pullet
Other Layers

13. Waste Treatment and Storage Lagoons (Verify the following information is accurate and complete. Make all necessary
corrections and provide missing data.)
Design
Estimated Liner Type Estimated Freeboard
Structure Date (Clay,Synthetic, Capacity Surface Area "Redline"
Name Built Unknown) (Cubic Feet) (Square Feet) (Inches)
PRIMARY 36.00
Mail one (1) copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with this completed and signed application
as-required by NC General Statutes 143-215.10C(d)to the address below.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
l. The most recent Waste Utilization Plan(WUP),signed b% the owner and a certified technical specialist,containing:
a. The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields(e.g.irrigation,injection,etc.)
b_ A map of every field used for land application(for example:irrigation map)
c. The soil series present on every land application field
d. The crops grown on every land application field
e. The Realistic Yield Expectation(RYE)for every crop shown in the WUP
f. The maximum PAN to be applied to every land application field
g. The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
h. The required NRCS Standard specifications
2. A site map/schematic
3. Emergency Action Plan
4. Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
5. Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
6. Mortality Control Checklist with selected method noted-Use the enclosed updated Mortality Control Checklist
7. Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.) Please be sure the above table is accurate and
complete. Also provide any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be applicable to
your facility.
8. Operation and Maintenance Plan
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal.
(e.g.composting,digesters,waste transfers,etc.)
As a second option to mailing paper copies of the application package, you can scan and email one signed copy of the
application and all the CAWMP items above to: [e-mail]
'rull COEQRWR
�
WON
2019
'VoterQua'ttY
Re4io'siop8raloosS °n

I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that,
if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not
included,this application package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-215.613, any person who knowingly makes any false statement,
representation, or certification in any application may be subject to civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation. (18 U.S.C.
Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both for
a similar offense.)
Printed Name of Signing Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all landowners should sign. if Landowner is a
corporation,signature should be by a principal executive officer of the corporation):
Name: Ta® Titic: W�Cr
Signature: Date:
Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Telephone number:[phone]
E-mail:2019PermitRenewaloncdenr.gov
FORM: RENEWAL-STATE GENERAL 02/2019
1

ROY COOPER ` _
Garerraor y4� ++.�
MIC HAEL S.REGAN '�' f RECEIb'ED/14CD
E'q/DWR
LINDA ,CULPEPPER NORTH CAR(TLINA I
#r � Fnwror�rt� Quwity L 2 3 2019
February 26,2019 WaterOl lgy
Jerry W Crawford Re Tonal Operativns S
Crawford Dairy A ffil
4085 Crawford Dairy Rd
Chapel Hill,NC 27516-5088
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring State General Permit
Dear Permittee:
Your facility is currently approved for cpc cation under one of the Animal Waste Operation State Non-Discharge General Permits,
which expire on September 30, 2019. Copies of the new animal waste operation State Non-Discharge General Permits are available
at h s://d .nc.eov/about/divisions/water-resources/water ualit -re ional-o erations/afo or by writing or calling:
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1 63 6
Telephone number:[phone]
In order to assure our continued cove e under the State Non-Dischar a General Permits ou must submit an a lication for
ermit coverage to the Division. Enclosed you will find a "R uest for Certificate of Covers a Facilit Current/ Covered b an
Expiring State Non-Dischar a General Permit." The application form must be 2019.
com leted si ed and returned b April 3 Please note that you must Include one 1 co , of the Certified Animal Waste Mana ement Plan CAWMP with the
com leII and signed application form. A list of items included in the CAWMP can be
application form. found on vage 2 of the renewal
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and could
result in assessments of civil penalties of up to$25,000 per day.
If you have any questions about the State Non-Discharge General Permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please feel
free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Branch staff at 919-707-9100.
Sincerely,
A�
Jon Risgaard,Section Chief
Animal Feeding Operations and Groundwater Section
Enclosures
cc(w/o enclosures): Raleigh Regional Office,Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Chatham County Soil and Water Conservation District
AFOG Section Central Files-AWCI90020
North Cwotine Department of Environmental Quality I oiwision of Water Resowces
+' 512 N.Saiill St.I :L636 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 276994638
" ""' 919.707cwo

ATV6MO z
April 1, 2019
APR 0 2 201�
Jerry W. Crawford
4085 Crawford Dairy Rd.
Chapel Hill,NC 27516
[phone]
Waste Storage Lagoon
Date Built: 1985
Liner Type: Clay
Capacity(cubic feet): 88,496 cubic feet total storage to ESW crest
Estimated Surface Area(square feet): 13,677 square feet
Design Freeboard"red line"(inches): 12 inches

APR 0 2 2010
COMPREHENSIVE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN s CNMP — North Car
Certification Sheet � '4'
Animal Feeding .
O peration AFO Name: �{-
Owner s : —
Address: L 0�15 �a �r Kd. NA 1
Farm/Tract Numbers _ 3� � t.
33
County c ies s
OVERALL COMPREHENSIVE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVAL
Certified Conservation Planner CCP : As a CCP in North Carolina, I have reviewed your conservation
plan prepared for the farms/tracts listed above, and determined that it meets the technical requirements
for a USDA Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plan (CNMP). This Plan includes planned(or existing)
practices for the following CNMP components: (1) Manure and Wastewater Handling and Storage, (2)
Land Treatment, (3) Land Application of Manure or-Organic Products, and(4)information on
recommended Record Keeping. This CNMP may also include components that address Feed
Management and Other Utilization Options. This CNMP contains all land units specific to this AFO that
you own, operate, or have decision-making authority and on which manure or organic by-products will be
generated, handled,stored, or applied.
Signature: r Date: Ll1
Name(printed): arI
Title: _ Certified Conservation Planner A enc /Or .:C -+hr�
DESIGN OF CNMP COMPONENTS/PRACTICES
CNMP Manure and Wastewater Storage and Handling: All practices needed for the handling and
storage of manure and wastewater either exist or have been designed according to NRCS standards.
Signature: " _ Date:
Name(printed): C,q Z r.
Title: Agency/Org- �, 5�cto
Land Treatment:All practices needed to maintain soil erosion to a sustainable level(on fields planned
for manure application)either exist or have been designed according to NRCS standards.
Signature: Date: 4 At 1071
Name(printed):
Title: Agency/Org: C6 -Swab
CNMP Land Applicatio,n:The nutrient management/waste utilization plan has been developed according
to NRCS standards 590, 633, and other applicable standards.
Signature: Date: LI
Name(printed): p,.l E4
Title: Agency/Org: I7 S W ei
NPPH,NC Supplement 2004-001,July 2004 P. 1

COMPREHENSIVE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN (CLAMP) — North Carolina
Additional Information for Producers
WHAT IS A USDA COMPREHENSIVE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN (CNMP)?
Your CNMP is a USDA Conservation Plan that addresses the natural resource concerns
associated with the management of manure and wastewater from livestock operations. Your
CNMP addresses:
Manure and Your CNMP ensures your operation has adequate collection, storage, and/or
Wastewater treatment of manure and organic by-products that allow land application of wastes
Storage and in an environmentally sound manner. Manure handling and animal mortality
Handling disposal practices that are designed as part of your CNMP will meet applicable
_ NRCS standards.
Land Application Your CNMP includes a Nutrient Management/Waste Utilization Plan for all fields
of Manure and where manure or organic by-products are applied to ensure that nitrogen,
Wastewater phosphorus,and other potential pollutants do not cause a water quality problem.
Your Nutrient Management Plan meets NRCS's standards 590 and 633 in the
Field Office Technical Guide.
Land Treatment Your CNMP includes erosion control practices on all land where manure or
for Application organic by-products are applied to ensure soil loss is kept to a sustainable level.
Areas Example practices include conservation tillage, cover crops,contour farming,
diversions or terraces, or similar practices. All erosion control practices designed
as part of your CNMP will meet NRCS standards in the Field Office Technical
Guide.
Record Keeping Although operation and maintenance records are your responsibility,your CNMP
includes record-keeping recommendations associated with each practice in your
CNMP. State laws and regulations identify specific record-keeping requirements
for re:;ulated or permitted operations.
Your CNMP may also address:
Feed Feed management activities may be used to reduce the nutrient content of
Management manure, reducing land application requirements. Examples include phase
feeding,amino acid supplemented low crude protein diets, or the use of low phytin
phosphorus grain and enzymes, such as phytase. You should always consult a
professional animal nutritionist before making any changes, as feed management
activities are not a viable or acceptable alternative for all operations.
Other Utilization There are a number of alternative technologies to conventional manure
Options management being evaluated in North Carolina and across the Nation as
environmentall. safe alternatives to land application of manure.
NORTH CAROLINA LAWS OR REGULATIONS
USDA does not have a regulatory role for nutrient management. Although CNMPs are only
required by USDA for animal operations participating in the Environmental Quality Incentives
Program under the 2002 Farm Bill, your CNMP may assist you in meeting federal or state water
quality regulations or permit requirements. You should be aware of applicable laws and
regulations in North Carolina that regulate the storage, handling, and land application of manure
and organic by-products generated on your operation. For additional information on certified
Waste Utilization Plans and applicable state laws and regulations, contact the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality [phone] or
Division of Soil and Water Conservation [phone].
NPPH,NC Supplement 2004-001,July 2004 p.2

COMPREHENSIVE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN (CNMP) —North Carolina
Checklist (page 1 of 2) CCP Initial :_0/�O
Animal Feeding
Operation AFO Name: hwLti
Owner(s): c-8
The items identified in the Plan column must be included in the Conservation Plan to report a
CNMP as planned. The items in the Design column may be completed during the practice
design for the specific CNMP components.
PI n Desi n I Site information Remarks
Names, phone numbers, and addresses of the AFO
owners'l and operator'sr.
Location of production site: Legal description, driving
instructions from nearest post office, and/or the
emergency 911 coordinates.
Conservation plan map,and farmstead sketch showing
the general location of barns, pens, storage structures,
etc. Clearly identified field identification numbers or
codes.
❑ Soils map with interpretations appropriate for planned
CNMP practices.
Existing documentation of present facility components j vrac�
that would aid in evaluating existing conditions,
capacities, etc. (i.e.,as-built plans,year installed, number
of animals a component was originally designed for, etc.).
PI n Design Production Information
Animal types, phases of production, and length of
confinement for each type at this site 633
Animal numbers and average weight for each phase of
production on this site(633)
Calculated manure and wastewater volumes for this site.
Amount of manure and wastewater to be land applied
633
Manure storage type,volume, and approximate length of
storage.
PI n Design Applicable Permits or Certifications
Producer and operators informed of their responsibilities Y
to comply with any applicable Federal,tribal, state, or
local permits and/or ordinances, including operator
certification, NPDES or other federal/state perm__its.
PI n I Design Land Application Site Information
Nutrient management(590)/waste utilization(633) plan
prepared in accordance with applicable FOTG standards,
including but not limited to: _
■ Maps of land application area (field identified
consistent with plan map) showing landuse and with
marked setbacks,buffers, and waterways, and
environmentally sensitive areas.
❑ ■ Third-party receiver agreements(if applicable)
❑ X Landowner names, addresses,for land application
fields not owned by producer.
■ PLAT and/or Li risk assessments for potential
_ nitrogen or phosphorus transport from fields.
• Crop types, realistic yield targets, and expected
nutrient uptake amounts.
NPPH,NC Supplement 2004-001,July 2004 p.3

Checklist (page 2 of 2) CCP Initial: C'40
■ Application equipment descriptions and methods of
a plication.
■ Expected application seasons and estimated days of
application per season.
■ Estimated application amounts per acre(volume in
gallons or tons per acre, and pounds of plant
available nitrogen, phosphorus as P205, and
potassium as K20 per acre .
■ Estimate of acres needed to apply manure generated
on this site, respecting any guidelines published for
nitro en or phosphorus soil loading limits.
Pl4n I Design Land Treatment Site Information
19 Practices existing or planned to achieve soil loss
tolerance on land application area (i.e., residue
mans ement, cropping rotation, diversions).
RUSLE Worksheet
NC-CPA-52 Environmental Assessment
p' Practice designs/specifications for erosion control
ractices er applicable FOTG standards. iQ
Plan Deslqn Manure &Wastewater Storage and Handling
Practice designs/specifications for manure and
wastewater storage,treatment, and handling practices
per applicable FOTG standards, including emergency
action- lans"633).
Plan Des! n Actual Activity Records
fif I Producer informed of record-keeping responsibilities
according to 590 and 633 standards, and applicable state
regulations on the storage,transport,transfer, testing,
and application of manure. Including but not limited to:
■ Soil and manure test reports.
■ Applied rates, methods of application, and timing
(month and year)of nutrients applied(include all
sources of nutrients-manure, commercial fertilizers,
' etc. .
■ Current and/or planned crop rotation.
❑ ■ Weather conditions during nutrient application
(optional).
_
❑ ■ General soil moisture condition at time of application
i.e., saturated,wet,moist,dry)(optional).
■ Actual crop and yield harvest from manure
application sites if used in lieu of RYEs.
❑ ■ Record of internal inspections for manure system , Czoo ;.,r Sc:��v
components.
❑ ■ Record of any spill events. _ NA
❑ ■ Changes or modifications to CNMP _ N►t
Plan Design Mortality Disposal
p Practices planned for morality disposal.
Ur Design specifications and equipment used to implement
the dis osal plan.
Plan Design O eration and Maintenance _
Detailed operation and maintenance procedures for the
conservation system, holding facility, etc., contained in
the CNMP. This would include procedures such as
calibration of land application equipment, storage facility
emptying schedule, soil and manure sampling
techni ues, etc. _
NPPH,NC Supplement 2004-001,July 2004 p.4

ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS FOR CONSERVATION PLANS AND
AREAWIDE CONSERVATION PLANS (NRCS-CPA-52 =w;a�,,
ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS 1A ZO19
_ NORTH CAROLINA HELP SHEET )7�
In order to determine the economic effects,consider the following questions when filling out the NRCS-
CPA-52. If you answer NO to any of these questions,further review or explanation may be necessary
before proceeding with the recommended conservation system. When the answer is YES, no further
data is needed,and the decision is noted in the planning support file.
LAND USE YES NO
• Is the land available for the recommended production? ® ❑_
• Is base acreage for USDA programs adequately maintained? $I ❑
• Does the proposed system aid participation in USDA programs? ts ❑
CAPITAL YES NO
• Does the producer have the funds or ability to obtain the funds
needed to implement the proposed conservation-system? A ❑
• Are there adequate materials and/or equipment present or
obtainable to operate and maintain the system? !9 ❑
LABOR YES NO
• Is there adequate labor present or obtainable to operate and
maintain the system? lK ❑
MANAGEMENT YES NO
• Does client understand the inputs needed to implement the
system and his responsibility in obtaining these inputs? ❑
• Will the client able to maintain the system as implemented? l�. ❑
• Is there adequate management present or obtainable to operate
and maintain the system ❑
USDA-NR C S
8/7/01

NRCS-CPA-52,ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS,NORTH CAROLINA HELP SHEET,
RISK YES NO
• Are there readily available markets for the operations products? �I ❑
• Are markets adequate to handle the production for the area? 181 ❑
• Is.the producer willing to adopt new practices? L ❑
PROFITABILITY YES NO
• Do the benefits of improving the current operation outweigh the
installation and maintenance costs (positive benefit/cost ratio)? �l ❑
• Will the producer be able to remain financially stabile if the
system is implemented? ❑
• Will normal farm/ranch operations sustain the financial viability
of the operation? ® ❑
• Is there a reasonable expectation of long-term profitability for the
operation if the system is implemented? (Xd ❑
If you answered NO to any question,enter explanations in the Effects Notes section of the
NRCS-CPA-52 or at the bottom of this page and attach to the NRCS-CPA-52.
USDA-NRCS
8/7/01

ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS FOR CONSERVATION PLANS AND
AREAWIDE CONSERVATION PLANS (NRCS-CPA-52)
SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
NORTH CAROLINA HELP SHEET
In order to determine the social effects, consider the following questions when filling out the NRCS-
CPA-52.If you answer yes to any of these questions,further review or explanation may be
necessary. When the answer is no,no further data is needed,and the decision is noted in the planning
support file.
CLIENT WELL-BEING YES NO
• Are farmer attitudes toward certain conservation practices likely to
affect the success of the project? ❑
• Will there be a change in the quality of life, Iifestyle, attitude, and/or
behavior? ❑ 93
• Will social,family,or religious values be affected? ❑
• Are farm residents likely to be affected negatively by the activity? ❑ l�l
• Are there typical or unique characteristics of farms that may have
relevance to the activity(absentee landowners,land use ethic, etc.)? ❑ tl
• Some characteristics (age,planning horizons, special emphasis groups,
resources,etc.) are not considered during planning? ❑
• Will change negatively affect the client's ownership/lease of the land? ❑ G�1
• Will client tenure affect installation and management of the
conservation system? ❑ Q
• Is time available(absentee or part-time landowner, etc.) for installation
and management of the conservation system? ❑ fig(
COMMUNITY WELL-BEING YES NO
• Are people likely to be adversely affected by the activity? ❑ 0
• Will there be an effect on life, health, and/or safety? ❑ ill
• Local community standards regarding health and safety were not
followed? ❑ [�
• Are there historical factors that are likely to be relevant in the proposed
activity(changes in land use,farm management techniques,etc.) ❑
USDA-NRCS
8/7/01

NRCS-CPA-52,SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS,NORTH CAROLINA HELP SHEET,Page 2
COMMUNITY WELL-BEING(con't) YES NO
• Are there communities in the study area that would be affected
adversely by the proposed activity (loss of recreation, etc.)? ❑ 09
• Are there community organizations, church groups, etc. that would be
adversely affected by the proposed activity? ❑ DO
• Are there potential areas of conflict? ❑
IR
• Will community cohesion and/or stability be affected negatively? ❑
• Will this change affect just some individuals andlor groups? ❑
• Will this change.create inequity among individuals and/or groups? ❑ 09
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE YES NO
• The program, procedure, or activity carried out has disproportionate
adverse human health or environmental effects on minority or
low income populations? ❑ 0Q
If you answered yes to any question, enter explanations in the Effects Notes section of the NRCS-CPA-52 or
at the bottom of this page and attach to the NRCS-CPA-52.
USDA-NRCS
8/7/01

INVENTORY r RESOURCE CONCERNS TO BE " DF'gRESSED IN PLAN
6 /�, + _
Prepared for: eraw�OTJ 1� (� t_:r aw-FcJ Farm/Tract: t — 1?530
Prepared by: CdJ Wk�rw DA_L
�scauRCE o�rt:rr� FtELOS - PRESENT R SQUt G =,THj3EATS (LEst at{�ers as needed
.�,��-,' Y: '..,+ �3. . y;•.k�!��ex�v..t.M �r
RUSLE(Sheet&Rill) >T
Ephemeral Gully Erosion
j Classic Gully Erosion
Erosion Streambank Erosion
Damaging Soil Deposition
Excessive Wind Erosion
Restrictive Layer/Plow Pan!Compaction
Low Organic Matter
Improper pH
Surface Crusting
Quality
Salt Buildup
_ Buildup of Toxic Metals
Pesticide/Chemical Residue Buildup
Inadequate Nutrient Availability
_ Sedimentation
Nutrient Runoff from Manure(Point Source)
nil
✓ Nutrient Runoff/Leaching from Manure Application Areas
Quality Buildup of Excessive P in Soil
_ Pesticide Runoff
Inadequate Water for Livestock
Quantity Inadequate Water for Irrigation!Plant Growth
Excess Surface!Subsurface Water
Dust from Airborne Soil Particles/Smoke
Potential for Damaging Pesticide Drift
Quality R'11 Odor, Animal Waste Storage
Odor,Animal Waste Application
Plant Damage from Animal/Insect Pests
Invasive, Noxious, or Undesirable Plants
Plant Damage, Due to Soil Contaminant
Plant Damage from Excessive Traffic
Plant Damage from Airborne Contaminant
Reduced Yields from Inadequate Nutrients
Z Condition Reduced Yields from Inadequate Water
QPasture Vegetation Overgrazed
J Woodland Overstocked!Understocked
Plants Unsuited to Site/Intended Use
Loss or Degradation of Native Plant Communities

NC-CPA-52 aeP[4vu i lP.4l
Resource .ConcerrY' . Fiy.�x Present Res❑urce..Threats.t Others as needed)'
..
'L'Cr
i Inadequate Food for Desired.Species _
Inadequate Cover for Desired Species
Inadequate Water for Wildlife
Wildlife & Excessive Habitat Fragmentation
. Fisheries Excessive Monoculture (Low Habitat Diversity)
Barriers to Migration, Natural Movement
Poor Water Quality: Low Oxygen, High Temperature
Inadequate Forage Available or Nutrition Provided
Inadequate/ Poor Quality Water Supplied
Domestic Inadequate Shading for Grazed Animals
Unsafe Conditions for Animals
: ,:. ::.;
WHEN DURING.
RESDURCE CCNCER.tVT' -
INSTALLED LIFESPAN _�. , �! � �v � �•::_..
Extensive Capital Required?
�( Extensive or Specialized Labor Required?
Economic �•I _Very High Operation.&Management Level Required?
'.: High Economic Risk Involved?
System Compatible with Client's Objectives, Well-Being,
and Safety?
System Compatible with Community Well-Being &
Social ,! Environmental Protection?
Environmental Justice Considered During Planning?
WILL THE SYSTEM TO BE PLANNED: (YIN) FIELDS
Negatively impact any prime or unique farmland or scenic beauty of the area? -/ J1
Include any earth disturbing activities near pipelines, electrical, or other utilities? iv i
Have a high likelihood of causing public controversy? 1
g 9 a P Y
' Affect any suspected threatened or endangered species, or their habitat?
w 0
c r {+) positive, (0) neutral/none, (-) negative _
Result in the drainage, fill
or stumping of an wetlands?
:p ;: g 9f p 9 Y
(Will this cause "Swampbusting"? YIN_; Landowner advised to contact COE&
<�-­i NCDWQ concerning permit requirements? Y/N__j IV All
}` Negatively impact riparian vegetation in areas regulated by state/local law?
'w.;: (Landowner advised to contact NCDWQ, NCDFR, or other authority concerning
BMPs or permit requirements? YIN
_J
Result in the modification of a stream channel, or fill material being placed in any
natural or modified stream channel?
5: IV ,
z:. (Owner advised to contact COE&NCDWQ for permit requirements? Y/N
Contain any practices considered as Undertakings (Sect I FOTG)?
(Request for CR Review submitted? Y/N_; CR survey completed? Y/N_J _A-!
v:. Fall within an area regulated under the Coastal Zone Management Act?
:w..
a. : (Owner advised to contact NCDCM for permit requirements? YIN� all
Negatively impact water quality and/or visual aesthetics of the Lumber River, the
New River, or other Designated Wild &Scenic Rivers? If-
Result in loss of floodplain capacity?
To the best of my knowledge, no further environmental analysis is needed.
In my opinion,the system to be planned may have negative impacts related to one or more of the listed
special environmental concerns. (See attached notes.) The plan for this system will be completed in
accordance with NRCS policy.
Signature Certifie Conser i n fanner Title f Date
of

Jerry Crawford Soil Description
And Soil Map Legend
Name: Jerry Crawford
Soil Map Legend
For
Jerry Crawford
Soil Map Legend Mapping Unit
51 B 51 B - Helena Sandy Loam, 2 to 6% slopes
33B 33B - Cecil Gravelly Sandy Loam,2 to 6% slopes
130B 130B—Nanford-Badin Complex, 2 to 6%slopes
130C 130C—Nanford-Badin Complex, 6 to 10% slopes
37B 37B - Wedowee Sandy Loam, 2 to 6% slopes
205B 205B—Georgeville Silt Loam, 2 to 6% slopes
205132 205132- Georgeville Silty Clay Loam, 2 to 6% slope
205C 205C—Georgeville Silt Loam, 6 to 10% slopes
212B 212B—Herdon Silt Loam, 2 to 6% slopes
Non Technical Soil Description
Jerry Crawford
51B=Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Setting
Landscape: Piedmont uplands, mainly in the northern part of the county south of Chapel
Hill
Landform: Ridges, drainageways and heads of drainageways
Shape of areas: Irregular
Size of areas: 5 to 50 acres
Composition
Helena and similar soils: 80 percent
Dissimilar soils: 20 percent
Typical Profile
Surface layer:
0 to 6 inches=dark grayish brown sandy loam
Subsurface layer:
6 to 9 inches=light yellowish brown sandy loam

Subsoil:
9 to 13 inches=yellowish brown sandy clay loam
13 to 22 inches=yellowish brown clay that has strong brown mottles
22 to 30 inches=brownish yellow clay that has yellowish brown and light brownish gray
mottles
30 to 44 inches=reddish yellow clay loam that has light brownish gray and yellowish
brown mottles
Underlying material:
44 to 64 inches=mottled in shades of brown, red, yellow and gray sandy clay loam
saprolite
Soil Properties and Qualities
Depth class: Very deep
Agricultural drainage class: Moderately well drained
Permeability: Slow
Available water capacity: Moderate to high
Depth to seasonal high water table; kind: 1.5 to 2.5 feet below the soil surface during the
months of January through April; perched
Shrink-swell potential: High
Hazard of flooding: None
Surface runoff. High
Hazard of water erosion: Moderate
Parent material: Residuum weathered from felsic to mafic high-grade metamorphic or
igneous rock
Depth to bedrock: More than 60 inches
Minor Components
Dissimilar:
Random areas of well drained Vance soils
Random areas of well drained moderately permeable Wedowee
Random areas of very slowly permeable, very high shrink-swell Iredell soils Random
areas of soils that have less clay in the subsoil
Poorly drained soils along drainageways and in depressional areas
Similar:
Random areas of Helena soils with gravelly or cobbly surface layers
Random areas of soils that have reaction in the lower subsoil that ranges to moderately
alkaline
Random areas of Helena and similar soils that have fine sandy loam, loam, and coarse
sandy loam surface layers
Land Use
Dominant uses: Woodland, pasture and hayland, and cropland
Other uses: Urban development
Agriculture
Cropland
Suitability: Well suited

Commonly grown crops: Corn, soybeans and small grains
Management concerns: Erodibility and wetness
Management measures and considerations:
Resource management systems that include terraces and diversions, striperopping,
contour tillage, no-till farming, and crop residue management help to control soil erosion
and surface runoff and maximize the infiltration of rainfall.
Installing and maintaining an artificial drainage system help to reduce wetness limitations
and improve the productivity of these soils.
Pasture and hayland
Suitability: Moderately suited
Commonly grown crops: Tall fescue and orchard grass
Management concerns: Erodibility and wetness
Management measures and considerations:
Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to control soil erosion and
increase germination.
Fencing livestock away from creeks and streams helps to prevent streambank erosion and
sedimentation.
Preventing overgrazing or preventing grazing when the soil is wet helps to prevent soil
compaction, a decrease in productivity, and'a rough surface layer.
Installing and maintaining a subsurface drainage system help to improve the productivity
of moisture-sensitive crops, such as alfalfa.
Woodland
Suitability: Well suited
Productivity class: Moderately high for loblolly pine
Management concerns: Equipment use
Planting the appropriate species, as recommended by a forester, helps to achieve
maximum productivity and ensure planting success.
Restricting the use of standard wheeled and tracked equipment to dry periods helps to
minimize rutting and soil compaction, which occur when the soils are saturated.
Leaving a buffer zone of trees and shrubs adjacent to streams helps to reduce siltation and
improve aquatic habitat by providing shade for the water surface.
Urban Development
Dwellings
Suitability: Poorly suited
Management concerns: Wetness shrink-swell
Management measures and considerations:
Constructing dwellings on raised,well-compacted fill material helps to reduce the risk of
damage from wetness.
Artificial drainage systems or diversions help to remove excess surface water.
Reinforcing basements or backfilling with coarse-textured material helps to strengthen
foundations and prevent damage caused by shrinking and swelling.
Vegetating disturbed areas and providing erosion-control structures, such as sediment
fences and catch basins helps to keep eroding soil on site..
Septic tank absorption fields
Suitability: Poorly suited
Management concerns: Restricted permeability and wetness
Management measures and considerations:

This map unit has severe limitations affecting septic tank absorption fields. The Chatham
County Health Department should be contacted for additional guidance.
This map unit is difficult to manage for septic tank absorption fields because the
dominant soils have a high water table at a depth of 1.5 to 3 feet.
Local roads and streets
Suitability: Poorly suited
Management concerns: Low strength and shrink-swell
Management measures and considerations:
Installing geotextile fabric between the base aggregate and the final surface of the road
helps to improve performance.
Incorporating sand and gravel with the soil material and compacting roadbeds helps to
improve soil strength.
Removing as much of the clay material as possible and increasing the thickness of the
base aggravate helps to improve soil performance.
Recreation
Camp areas
Suitability: Moderately suited
Management concerns: Restricted permeability and wetness
Management measures and considerations:
Designing campsites on raised pads of gravel fill material helps to minimize the wetness
problem.
Locating campsites in the higher areas allows better surface water runoff and helps to
keep campsites drier during wet periods.
Providing a gravel pad for tents and other facilities helps to overcome the restricted water
movement in the soil.
Vegetating cleared and graded areas as soon as possible helps to maintain soil stability
and prevent erosion.
Picnic areas
Suitability: Moderately suited
Management concerns: Restricted permeability and wetness
Management measures and considerations:
Designing picnic areas on raised pads of gravel fill material helps to minimize wetness
and restricted permeability.
Playgrounds
Suitability: Moderately suited
Management concerns: Restricted permeability, steepness of slope and wetness
Management measures and considerations:
Cutting, filling, or grading only areas requiring excavation improves soil stability and
reduces equipment limitations caused by the slope.
Artificial drainage systems or diversions help to remove excess surface water and
minimize the wetness limitation.
Using diversions helps to remove excess surface water.
Vegetating cleared and graded areas as soon as possible helps to maintain soil stability
and prevent erosion.
Paths and trails
Suitability: Moderately suited
Management concerns: Wetness

Management measures and considerations:
Designing paths and trails on raised pads helps to minimize wetness.
Designing paths and trails on the contour and providing adequate water-control
structures, such as culverts, help to maintain the stability of trails.
Interpretive Groups
Land capability classification: IIe
Woodland ordination symbol: 8A for loblolly pine
33S=Cecil gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Setting
Landscape: Piedmont Uplands mainly in the southeastern part of the county near Harnett
County
Landform: Interstream divides and broad ridges
Shape of areas: Irregular
Size of areas: 10 to 150 acres
Composition
Cecil and similar soils: 90 percent
Dissimilar soils: 10 percent
Typical Profile
Surface layer:
0 to 7 inches=dark yellowish brown gravelly sandy loam
Subsurface layer:
7 to 14 inches=yellowish brown gravelly sandy loam
Subsoil:
14 to 35 inches=red clay
35 to 44 inches=red clay loam that has reddish yellow mottles
Underlying material:
44 to 60 inches=mottled red, reddish yellow, and pinkish white loam saprolite
Soil Properties and Qualities
Depth class: Very deep
Agricultural drainage class: Well drained
Permeability: Moderate
Available water capacity: Moderate
Depth to seasonal high water table: More than 6.0 feet below the soil surface
Shrink-swell potential: Low
Hazard of flooding: None
Surface runoff. Medium
Hazard of water erosion: Slight

Parent material: Residuum weathered from felsic high-grade metamorphic or igneous
rock
Depth to bedrock: More than 60 inches, commonly more than 20 feet
Minor Components
Dissimilar:
Moderately well drained, slowly permeable Helena soils at heads of drains and along
drainageways
Similar:
Random areas of Cecil soils with non-gravelly surface layers
Random areas of Pacolet soils that have a depth to saprolite of less than 40 inches
Random areas of Wedowee soils that have yellower subsoil and are less than 40 inches to
saprolite
Land Use
Dominant uses: Woodland
Other uses: Pasture and hayland, and cropland
Agriculture
Cropland
Suitability: Well suited
Commonly grown crops: Tobacco, corn, soybeans, and small grain
Management concerns: Erodibility
Management measures and considerations:
Resource management systems that include terraces and diversions, striperopping,
contour tillage, no-till farming, and crop residue management help to control soil erosion
and surface runoff and maximize the infiltration of rainfall.
Pasture and hayland
Suitability: Well suited
Commonly grown crops: Tall fescue, clover, and bermudagrass.
Management concerns: No significant limitations affect management of pasture and
hayland.
Management measures and considerations:
Planting adapted species helps to ensure the production of high-quality forage and
minimize soil erosion.
The timely removal of livestock from pastures so that forage plants can recover before
winter dormancy helps to maintain pasture and increase productivity.
Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain
pasture and increase productivity.
Woodland
Suitability: Well suited
Productivity class: Moderately high for loblolly pine
Management concerns: No significant limitations affect woodland management.
Management measures and considerations:
Leaving a buffer zone of trees and shrubs adjacent to streams helps to reduce siltation and
improve aquatic habitat by providing shade for the water surface.

Urban Development
Dwellings
Suitability: Well suited
Management concerns:No significant limitations affect dwellings.
Management measures and considerations:
Vegetating disturbed areas and providing erosion-control structures, such as sediment
fences and catch basins helps to keep eroding soil on site.
Septic tank absorption fields
Suitability: Moderately suited
Management concerns: Restricted permeability
Management measures and considerations:
The Chatham County Health Department should be contacted for guidance on sanitary
facilities.
Installing distribution lines on the contour helps to improve the performance of septic
tank absorption fields.
Increasing the size of septic tank absorption field helps to improve performance.
Installing septic system distribution lines only during dry periods helps to reduce
smearing and sealing of trench walls.
Local roads.and streets
Suitability: Moderately suited
Management concerns: Low strength
Management measures and considerations:
Incorporating sand and gravel with the soil material and compacting roadbeds helps to
improve soil strength.
Vegetating cut and fill slopes as soon as possible after construction helps to stabilize the
soil and prevent excessive soil erosion.
Recreation
Camp areas
Suitability: Moderately suited
Management concerns: Rock fragment content
Management measures and considerations:
Rake camp areas to remove rock fragments
Construct elevated campsites with suitable material
Picnic areas
Suitability: Moderately suited
Management concerns: Rock fragment content
Management measures and considerations:
Rake picnic areas to remove rock fragments
Construct elevated picnic areas with suitable material
Playgrounds
Suitability: Moderately suited
Management concerns: Steepness of slope and rock fragment content
Management measures and considerations:
Extensive grading, including cutting and filling slopes,may be required.

Cutting, filling, or grading only areas requiring excavation improves soil stability and
reduces equipment limitations caused by the slope.
Rake playground areas to remove rock fragments
Vegetating cleared and graded areas as soon as possible helps to maintain soil stability
and prevent erosion.
Leaving a buffer zone of grass,trees, and shrubs adjacent to streams and drainageways
helps to reduce siltation and provides shade.
Paths and trails
Suitability: Well suited
Management concerns: No significant limitations affect paths and trails.
Management measures and considerations:
Designing paths and trails on the contour helps to maintain the stability of trails.
Interpretive Groups
Land capability classification: IIe
Woodland ordination symbol: 8A for loblolly pine
205B=Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Typical Profile
Surface layer:
0 to 7 inches=brown silt loam
Subsoil:
7 to 10 inches=yellowish red silty clay loam
10 to 36 inches=red clay
36 to 44 inches=red clay that has strong brown mottles
44 to 53 inches=red silty clay loam that has yellow and brown mottles
Underlying material:
53 to 62 inches=red, yellow and brown saprolite that has white mottles
Soil Properties and Qualities
Depth class: Very deep
Agricultural drainage class: Well drained
Permeability: Moderate
Available water capacity: High to very high
Depth to seasonal high water table; kind: More than 60 inches
Shrink-swell potential: Low
Hazard of flooding: None
Surface runoff. Low
Hazard of water erosion: Severe
Soil reaction: Very strongly acid to strongly acid, except where the surface has been
limed
Parent material: Residuum weathered from fine-grained metavolcanic rocks
Depth to bedrock: More than 60 inches
Land Use

Dominant uses: woodland,pasture and hayland, and cropland
Other uses: Urban development
Agriculture
Cropland
Suitability: Well suited
Commonly grown crops: Corn, soybeans, small grain and tobacco
Management concerns: Erodibility and soil fertility
Management measures and considerations:
Resource management systems that include contour farming, conservation tillage, crop
residue management, striperopping, and sod-based rotations help to control soil erosion
and surface runoff and maximize the infiltration of water.
Applying lime and fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests helps to
increase the availability of plant nutrients and maximize productivity.
Pasture and hayland
Suitability: Well suited
Commonly grown crops: Tall fescue, orchardgrass and clover
Management concerns: Erodibility
Management measures and considerations:
Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to control soil erosion and
increase germination.
Fencing livestock away from creeks and streams helps to prevent streambank erosion and
sedimentation.
Planting adapted species helps to ensure the production of high-quality forage and
minimize soil erosion.
The timely removal of livestock from pastures so that forage plants can recover before
winter dormancy helps to maintain pasture and increase productivity.
Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain
pasture and increase productivity.
When establishing, maintaining, or renovating hay and pasture, applying lime and
fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests helps to increase the
availability of plant nutrients and maximize productivity.
205B2=Georgeville silty clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
Typical Profile
Surface layer:
0 to 7 inches=red silty clay loam
Subsoil:
7 to 44 inches=red clay
44 to 52 inches=red silty clay loam that has strong brown mottles
Underlying material:
52 to 62 inches=reddish yellow silt loam saprolite that has red mottles
Soil Properties and Qualities
Depth class: Very deep

Agricultural drainage class: Well drained
Permeability: Moderate
Available water capacity: High or very high
Depth to seasonal high water table; kind: More than 60 inches
Shrink-swell potential: Low
Hazard of flooding: None
Surface runoff. Low
Hazard of water erosion: Very severe
Parent material: Residuum weathered from fine-grained metavolcanic rocks of the
Carolina Slate Belt
Depth to bedrock: More than 60 inches
Land Use
Dominant uses: Pasture and hayland, woodland, and cropland
Other uses: Urban development
Agriculture
Cropland
Suitability: Well suited
Commonly grown crops: Corn, soybeans, small grain and tobacco
Management concerns: Erodibility and soil fertility
Management measures and considerations:
Resource management systems including contour farming, conservation tillage, crop
residue management, striperopping, and sod-based rotations help to prevent further
erosion by stabilizing the soil, controlling runoff, and maximizing water infiltration.
Applying lime and fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests helps to
increase the availability of plant nutrients and maximize productivity.
Pasture and hayland
Suitability: Well suited
Commonly grown crops: Tall fescue, orchardgrass and clover
Management concerns: Erodibility
Management measures and considerations:
Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to control soil erosion and
increase germination.
Fencing livestock away from creeks and streams helps to prevent streambank erosion and
sedimentation.
Planting adapted species helps to ensure the production of high-quality forage and
minimize soil erosion.
When establishing, maintaining, or renovating hay and pasture, applying lime and
fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests helps to increase the
availability of plant nutrients and maximize productivity.
205C=Georgeville silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Typical Profile
Surface layer:
0 to 7 inches=brown silt loam
Subsoil:

7 to 10 inches=yellowish red silty clay loam
10 to 36 inches=red clay
36 to 44 inches=red clay that has strong brown mottles
44 to 53 inches=red silty clay loam that has yellow and brown mottles
Underlying material:
53 to 62 inches=red, yellow and brown saprolite thathas white mottles
Soil Properties and Qualities
Depth class: Very deep
Agricultural drainage class: Well drained
Permeability: Moderate
Available water capacity: High or very high
Depth to seasonal high water table; kind: More than 60 inches
Shrink-swell potential: Low
Hazard of flooding: None
Surface runoff: Low
Hazard of water erosion: Severe
Parent material: Residuum weathered from fine-grained metavolcanic rocks of the
Carolina Slate Belt-
Depth to bedrock: More than 60 inches
Land Use
Dominant uses: woodland, pasture and hayland, and cropland
Other uses: Urban development
Agriculture
Cropland
Suitability: Moderately suited
Commonly grown crops: Corn, soybeans, small grain and tobacco
Management concerns: Erodibility and soil fertility
Management measures and considerations:
Resource management systems that include contour farming, conservation tillage, crop
residue management, striperopping, and sod-based rotations help to control soil erosion
and surface runoff and maximize the infiltration of water.
Applying lime and fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests helps to
increase the availability of plant nutrients and maximize productivity.
Pasture and hayland
Suitability: Well suited for pasture; moderately suited for hayland
Commonly grown crops: Tall fescue, orchardgrass and clover
Management concerns: Erodibility
Management measures and considerations:
Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to control soil erosion and
increase germination.
Fencing livestock away from creeks and streams helps to prevent streambank erosion and
sedimentation.
Planting adapted species helps to ensure the production of high-quality forage and
minimize soil erosion.
The timely removal of livestock from pastures so that forage plants can recover before
winter dormancy helps to maintain pasture and increase productivity.

Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain
pasture and increase productivity.
When establishing, maintaining, or renovating hay and pasture, applying lime and
fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests helps to increase the
availability of plant nutrients and maximize productivity.
130B - Nanford — Badin complex, 2 to 6 % slopes
Setting
Landscape: Piedmont uplands in the Carolina Slate Belt, mainly in the central and
western part of the county
Landform: Interstream divides and broad ridges
Shape of areas: Rounded or irregular
Size of areas: 5 to 500 acres
Composition
Nanford and similar soils: 36 percent
Badin and similar soils: 32 percent
Dissimilar soils: 32 percent
Typical Profile
Nanford soils
Surface layer:
0 to 3 inches=brown silt loam
Subsurface layer:
3 to 7 inches=light brown silt loam
Subsoil:
7 to 12 inches=strong brown silty clay loam
12 to 27 inches=strong brown silty clay that has brown mottles
27 to 38 inches=strong brown silty clay loam that has brown mottles
Underlying material:
38 to 57 inches=reddish yellow loam saprolite
Bedrock layer:
57 to 61 inches=weathered moderately fractured fine-grained metavolcanic rock
Badin soils
Surface layer:
0 to 4 inches; brown silt loam
Subsoil:
4 to 16 inches; strong brown clay
16 to 24 inches; strong brown silty clay loam
24 to 32 inches; strong brown clay loam that has reddish yellow mottles
Bedrock:
32 to 60 inches; weathered, moderately fractured fine-grained metavolcanic rock
Soil Properties and Qualities
Depth class: Nanford=deep; Badin=moderately deep

Agricultural drainage class: Well drained
Permeability: Moderate
Available water capacity:Nanford=high; Badin=moderate
Depth to seasonal high water table; kind: More than 6.0 feet below the soil surface
Shrink-swell potential: Nanford=low; Badin=moderate
Hazard of flooding: None
Surface runoff. Medium
Hazard of water erosion: Severe
Parent material: Residuum weathered from fine-grained metavolcanic rock
Depth to bedrock: Nanford=40 to 60 inches to soft bedrock and more than 60 inches to
hard bedrock; Badin=20 to 40 inches to soft bedrock and 40 inches or more to hard
bedrock
Minor Components:
Dissimilar:
Random areas of well drained Herndon soils with depth to rock of more than 60 inches
Random areas of well drained Georgeville soils that have a depth to soft bedrock of more
than 60 inches
Somewhat poorly drained Cid and Lignum soils in concave areas at the head of drains
and along drainageways
Random areas of shallow, well drained to excessively Goldston soils with depth to soft
bedrock less than 20 inches
Slowly permeable Enon soils_with high shrink-swell and depth to bedrock more than 60
inches on the outer edge of map units
Random areas of very slowly permeable, somewhat poorly drained Pittsboro soils with a
very high shrink-swell potential and depth to hard bedrock 40 to more than 60 inches
Random areas of surface stones and boulders shown with special symbols
Similar:
Random areas of Nanford or Badin soils with gravelly or cobbly surface layers
Random areas of Tarrus soils that have red or yellowish red subsoil and depth to soft
bedrock 40 to 60 inches
Random areas of Nanford or Badin soils with loam, fine sandy loam or very fine sandy
loam surface textures
Land Use
Dominant uses: Woodland
Other uses: Pasture and hayland, cropland, and urban development
Agriculture
Cropland
Suitability:Nanford=well suited; Badin--moderately suited
Commonly grown crops: Corn, soybeans, small grain, and tobacco
Management concerns: Nanford=erodibility; Badin=erodibility and rooting depth
Management measures and considerations:
Resource management systems that include contour farming, conservation tillage,crop
residue management, striperopping, and sod-based rotations help to control soil erosion
and surface runoff and maximize the infiltration of water.

Returning plant residue to the soil helps to improve the water-holding capacity, and
planting shallow-rooted crops helps to overcome the moderately deep rooting depth in the
Badin soils
Pasture and hayland
Suitability: Well suited
Commonly grown crops: Tall fescue, orchardgrass, and clover
Management concerns: Erodibility
Management measures and considerations:
Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to control soil erosion and
increase germination.
Fencing livestock away from creeks and streams helps to prevent streambank erosion and
sedimentation.
Planting adapted species helps to ensure the production of high-quality forage and
minimize soil erosion.
The timely removal of livestock from pastures so that forage plants can recover before
winter dormancy helps to maintain pasture and increase productivity.
Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain
pasture and increase productivity.
When establishing, maintaining, or renovating hay and pasture, applying lime and
fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests helps to increase the
availability of plant nutrients and maximize productivity.
Woodland
Suitability: Well suited
Productivity: Moderately high for loblolly pine
Management concerns:Nanford=no significant limitations affect woodland management;
Badin=windthrow hazard
Management measures and considerations:
Leaving a buffer zone of trees and shrubs adjacent to streams helps to reduce siltation and
improve aquatic habitat by providing shade for the water surface.
Maintaining surface litter helps to increase water infiltration and reduces seedling
mortality rates on the Badin soils.
Productivity may be increased by periodically harvesting windthrown trees, which result
from high winds and the limited rooting depth on Badin soils.
Urban Development
Dwellings
Suitability: Nanford=well suited; Badin=moderately suited
Management concerns: Nanford=no significant limitations affect dwellings;
Badin=shrink-swell and depth to rock
Management measures and considerations:
Vegetating disturbed areas and providing erosion-control structures, such as sediment
fences and catch basins help to keep eroding soil on site.
Reinforcing foundations and footings or backfilling with coarse-textured material helps to
strengthen buildings and prevent damage caused by shrinking and swelling in the Badin
soils.

Vegetating disturbed areas and providing erosion-control structures, such as sediment
fences and catch basins helps to keep eroding soil on site.
Septic tank absorption fields
Suitability:.Nanford=moderately suited; Badin=poorly suited;
Management concerns:Nanford=depth to rock and restricted permeability; Badin=depth
to rock and restricted permeability;
Management measures and considerations:
The Chatham County Health Department should be contacted for guidance on sanitary
facilities.
Locating and installing septic tank absorption fields in the deeper Nanford soils may
improve the performance of filter fields.
Increasing the size of septic tank absorption field helps to improve performance.
Installing septic system distribution lines only during dry periods helps to reduce
smearing and sealing of trench walls.
Local roads and streets
Suitability: Poorly suited
Management concerns: Low strength
Management measures and considerations:
Incorporating sand and gravel, compacting roadbeds, and designing roads to conform
with natural slopes helps to improve soil strength.
Vegetating cut and fill slopes as soon as possible after construction helps to stabilize the
soil and prevent excessive soil erosion.
Recreational Development
Camp areas
Suitability: Well suited
Management concerns: No significant limitations affect camp areas.
Management measures and considerations:
Vegetating cleared and graded areas as soon as possible helps to maintain soil stability
and prevent erosion.
Picnic areas
Suitability: Well suited
Management concerns: No significant limitations affect picnic areas.
Management measures and considerations:
Vegetating cleared and graded areas as soon as possible helps to maintain soil stability
and prevent erosion.
Playgrounds
Suitability: Moderately suited
Management concerns: Steepness of slope

Management measures and considerations:
Cutting, filling, or grading only areas requiring excavation improves soil stability and
reduces equipment limitations caused by the slope.
Vegetating cleared and graded areas as soon as possible helps to maintain soil stability
and prevent erosion.
Paths and trails
Suitability: No significant limitations affect paths and trails.
Management concerns: Erodibility
Management measures and considerations:
Designing paths and trails on the contour and providing adequate water-control
structures, such as culverts, help to maintain the stability of trails.
Interpretive Groups
Land capability classification: Nanford=IIe; Badin=IIIe
Woodland ordination symbol: Nanford=8A for loblolly pine; Badin=8D for loblolly pine
130C=Nanford-Badin Complex 6 to 10 percent slopes
Setting
Landscape: Piedmont uplands in the Carolina Slate Belt,mainly in the central and
western part of the county
Landform: Ridges and side slopes
Shape of areas: Long and narrow or irregular
Size of areas: 5 to 250 acres
Composition
Nanford and similar soils: 48 percent
Badin and similar soils: 28 percent
Dissimilar soils: 24 percent
Typical Profile
Nanford soils
Surface layer:
0 to 3 inches=brown silt loam
Subsurface layer:
3 to 7 inches=light brown silt loam
Subsoil:
7 to 12 inches=strong brown silty clay loam
12 to 27 inches=strong brown silty clay that has brown mottles
27 to 38 inches=strong brown silty clay loam that has brown mottles
Underlying material:
38 to 57 inches=reddish yellow loam saprolite
Bedrock layer:
57 to 61 inches=weathered moderately fractured fine-grained metavolcanic rock

Badin soils
Surface layer:
0 to 4 inches; brown silt loam
Subsoil:
4 to 16 inches; strong brown clay
16 to 24 inches; strong brown silty clay loam
24 to 32 inches; strong brown clay loam that has reddish yellow mottles
Bedrock:
32 to 60 inches; weathered, moderately fractured fine-grained metavolcanic rock
Soil Properties and Qualities
Depth class:Nanford=deep; Badin--moderately deep
Agricultural drainage class: Well drained
Permeability: Moderate
Available water capacity: Nanford=high; Badin--moderate
Depth to seasonal high water table;kind: More than 6.0 feet below the soil surface
Shrink-swell potential: Nanford=low; Badin=moderate
Hazard of flooding: None
Surface runoff: Medium
Hazard of water erosion: Severe
Parent material: Residuum weathered from fine-grained metavolcanic rock
Depth to bedrock: Nanford=40 to 60 inches to soft bedrock and more than 60 inches to
hard bedrock; Badin=20 to 40 inches to soft bedrock and 40 inches or more to hard
bedrock
Minor Components:
Dissimilar:
Somewhat poorly drained Cid soils in concave areas at the head of drains and along
drainageways
Random areas of shallow, well drained to excessively drained Goldston soils with depth
to soft bedrock less than 20 inches
Slowly permeable Enon soils with high shrink-swell and depth to bedrock more than 60
inches on the outer edge of map units
Random areas of very slowly permeable, somewhat poorly drained Pittsboro soils with a
very high shrink-swell potential and depth to hard bedrock 40 to more than 60 inches
Random areas of surface stones and boulders shown with special symbols
Random areas of Herndon and Georgeville soils that have a depth to soft bedrock of more
than 60 inches
Similar:
Random areas of Tarrus soils that have red or yellowish red subsoil and depth to soft
bedrock 40 to 60 inches
Random areas of Nanford or Badin soils with loam, fine sandy loam or very fine sandy
loam surface textures
Land Use
Dominant uses: Woodland
Other uses: Pasture, hayland, cropland, and urban development

Agricultural Development
Cropland
Suitability: Moderately suited
Commonly grown crops: corn, soybeans, small grain, and tobacco
Management concerns:Nanford=erodibility; Badin=erodibility and rooting depth
Management measures and considerations:
Resource management systems that include contour farming, conservation tillage,.crop
residue management, striperopping, and sod-based rotations help to control soil erosion
and surface runoff and maximize the infiltration of water.
Returning plant residue to the soil helps to improve the water-holding capacity, and
planting shallow-rooted crops helps to overcome the moderately deep rooting depth.
Pasture and hayland
Suitability: Well suited for pasture and moderately suited for hayland;
Commonly grown crops: Tall fescue, orchardgrass, and clover
Management concerns: Erodibility and equipment use
Management measures and considerations:
Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to control soil erosion and
increase germination.
Planting adapted species helps to ensure the production of high-quality forage and
minimize soil erosion.
Fencing livestock away from creeks and streams helps to prevent streambank erosion and
sedimentation.
Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain
pasture and increase productivity.
Woodland
Suitability: Well suited
Productivity: Moderately high for loblolly pine
Management concerns: Nanford=no significant limitations affect woodland management;
Badin=windthrow hazard
Management measures and considerations:
Productivity may be increased by periodic harvesting of windthrown trees caused by high
winds and limited rooting depth of the Badin soil.
Urban Development
Dwellings
Suitability: Moderately suited
Management concerns: Nanford=steepness of slope; Badin=steepness of slope, depth to
rock and shrink-swell
Management measures and considerations:
Designing structures that conform to the natural slope helps to improve soil performance.
Reinforcing foundations and footings or backfilling with coarse-textured material helps to
strengthen buildings and prevent damage caused by shrinking and swelling.
Vegetating disturbed areas and providing erosion-control structures, such as sediment
fences and catch basins, help to keep eroding soil on site.

Septic tank absorption fields
Suitability:Nanford=moderately suited; Badin=poorly suited
Management concerns: Depth to rock and restricted permeability;
Management measures and considerations:
The Chatham County Health Department should be contacted for guidance on sanitary
facilities.
Locating and installing septic tank absorption fields in the deeper Nanford soils may
improve the performance of filter fields.
Increasing the size of septic tank absorption field helps to improve performance.
Installing septic system distribution lines only during dry periods helps to reduce
smearing and sealing of trench walls.
Local roads and streets
Suitability: Poorly suited
Management concerns: Low strength
Management measures and considerations:
Incorporating sand and gravel, compacting roadbeds, and designing roads to conform
with natural slopes helps to improve soil strength.
Vegetating cut and fill slopes as soon as possible after construction helps to stabilize the
soil and prevent excessive soil erosion.
Recreational Development
Camp areas
Suitability: Moderately suited
Management concerns: Steepness of slope
Management measures and considerations:
Vegetating cleared and graded areas as soon as possible helps to maintain soil stability
and prevent erosion.
Picnic areas
Suitability: Moderately suited
Management concerns: Steepness of slope
Management measures and considerations:
Vegetating cleared and graded areas as soon as possible helps to maintain soil stability
and prevent erosion.
Playgrounds
Suitability: Poorly suited
Management concerns: steepness of slope
Management measures and considerations:
Cutting, filling, or grading only areas requiring excavation improves soil stability and
reduces equipment limitations caused by the slope.

Vegetating cleared and graded areas as soon as possible helps to maintain soil stability
and prevent erosion.
Paths and trails
Suitability: Moderately suited
Management concerns: Erodibility
Management measures and considerations:
Designing paths and trails on the contour and providing adequate water-control
structures, such as culverts,help to maintain the stability of trails.
Interpretive Groups
Land capability classification: Nanford=IIIe; Badin=IVe
Woodland ordination symbol: Nanford=8A for loblolly pine; Badin=8D for loblolly pine
37B=Wedowee sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Setting
Landscape: Piedmont uplands,mainly in the northern part of the county south of Chapel
Hill
Landform: Ridges and side slopes
Shape of areas: Irregular
Size of areas: 5 to 100 acres
Composition
Wedowee and similar soils:-81 percent
Dissimilar soils: 19 percent
Typical Profile
Surface layer:
0 to 5 inches=yellowish brown sandy loam
Subsoil:
5 to 28 inches=strong brown clay that has yellowish red mottles
28 to 60 inches=reddish yellow clay loam saprolite that has yellow and very pale brown
mottles
Soil Properties and Qualities
Depth class: Very deep
Agricultural drainage class: Well drained
Permeability: Moderate
Available water capacity: Moderate to high
Depth to seasonal high water table; kind: More than 6.0 feet below the soil surface
Shrink-swell potential: Low
Hazard of flooding: None
Surface runoff. Low
Hazard of water erosion: Moderate

Parent material: Residuum weathered from felsic high-grade metamorphic or igneous
rock
Depth to bedrock: More than 60 inches
Minor Components
Dissimilar:
Random areas of the slowly permeable Vance soils
The moderately well drained Helena soils at heads of drainageways and along
drainageways
Random areas of Rion soils that have less clay in the subsoil
Widely scattered surface cobbles, stones and boulders are shown with special symbols
Similar:
Random areas of Pacolet soils that have red subsoils
Appling soils that have a thicker subsoil on the more level parts of the map unit
Land Use
Dominant uses. Woodland, pasture and hayland, and urban development
Other uses: Cropland
Agricultural Development
Cropland
Suitability: Well suited
Commonly grown crops: Tobacco, corn, soybeans and small grain
Management concerns: Erodibility
Management measures and considerations:
Resource management systems that include terraces and diversions, striperopping,
contour tillage,no-till farming, and crop residue management help to control soil erosion
and surface runoff and maximize the infiltration of rainfall
Pasture and hayland
Suitability: Well suited
Commonly grown crops: Tall fescue, orchardgrass and clover
Management concerns: Erodibility .
Management measures and considerations:
Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to control soil erosion and
increase germination
Fencing livestock away from creeks and streams helps to prevent streambank erosion and
sedimentation
Woodland
Suitability: Well suited
Productivity class: Moderately high for loblolly pine
Management concerns: No significant limitations affect woodland management.
Management measures and considerations:
Leaving a buffer zone of trees and shrubs adjacent to streams helps to reduce siltation and
improve aquatic habitat by providing shade for the water surface

Urban Development
Dwellings
Suitability: Well suited
Management concerns: No significant limitations affect dwellings
Management measures and considerations:
Vegetating disturbed areas and providing erosion-control structures, such as sediment
fences and catch basins, help to keep eroding soil on site
Septic tank absorption fields
Suitability: Moderately suited
Management concerns: Restricted permeability
Management measures and considerations:
The Chatham County Health Department should be contacted for guidance on sanitary
facilities
Increasing the size of septic tank absorption field helps to improve performance.
Installing septic system distribution lines only during dry periods helps to reduce
smearing and sealing of trench walls
Local roads and streets
Suitability: Moderately suited
Management concerns: Low strength
Management measures and considerations:
Incorporating sand and gravel with the soil material and compacting roadbeds helps to
improve soil strength
Vegetating cut and fill slopes as soon as possible after construction helps to stabilize the
soil and prevent excessive soil erosion
Recreational Development
Camp areas
Suitability: Well suited
Management concerns:No significant limitations affect camp areas
Management measures and considerations:
Vegetating cleared and graded areas as soon as possible helps to maintain soil stability
and prevent erosion
Picnic areas
Suitability: Well suited
Management concerns: No significant limitations affect picnic areas.
Management measures and considerations:
Vegetating cleared and graded areas as soon as possible helps to maintain soil stability
and prevent erosion
Playgrounds
Suitability: Moderately suited
Management concerns: steepness of slope
Management measures and considerations:
Cutting, filling, or grading only areas requiring excavation improves soil stability and
reduces equipment limitations caused by the slope
Vegetating cleared and graded areas as soon as possible helps to maintain soil stability
and prevent erosion

Leaving a buffer zone of grass,trees, and shrubs adjacent to streams and drainageways
helps to reduce siltation and provides shade
Paths and trails
Suitability: Well suited
Management concerns:No significant limitations affect paths and trails.
Management measures and considerations:
Designing paths and trails on the contour and providing adequate water-control
structures;such as culverts, help to maintain the stability of trails
Interpretive Groups
Land capability classification: IIe
Woodland ordination symbol: 8A for loblolly pine
212B=Herndon silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Setting
Landscape: Piedmont uplands in the Carolina Slate Belt,mainly in the central and
western parts of the county.
Landform: Interstream divides and broad ridges
Shape of areas: Rounded or irregular
Size of areas: 5 to 50 acres
Composition
Herndon and similar soils: 68 percent
Dissimilar soils: 32 percent
Typical Profile
Surface layer:
0-to 3 inches=light yellowish brown silt loam
Subsurface layer:
3 to 9 inches=brownish yellow silt loam
Subsoil:
9 to 14 inches=reddish yellow silty clay loam
14 to 34 inches=yellowish red silty clay that has yellow and reddish yellow mottles
34 to 48 inches=yellowish red silty clay loam that has yellow,very pale brown, and
reddish yellow mottles
Underlying material:
48 to"60 inches=red silt loam saprolite that has yellow and reddish yellow mottles
Soil Properties and Qualities
Depth class: Very deep
Agricultural drainage class: Well drained
Permeability: Moderate
Available water capacity: High to very high
Depth to seasonal high water table; kind: More than 60 inches
Shrink-swell potential: Low

Hazard of flooding: None
Surface runoff: Low
Hazard of water erosion: Severe
Parent material: Residuum weathered from fine-grained metavolcanic rocks of the
Carolina Slate Belt
Depth to bedrock: More than 60 inches
Minor Components
Dissimilar:
Random areas of Nanford and Tarrus soils that have depth to soft bedrock 40 to 60 inches
Moderately well drained and somewhat poorly drained Lignum soils with depth to soft
bedrock 40 to 60 inches, and Cid soils that have depth to soft bedrock 20 to 40 inches
along drainageways and heads of drainageways.
Random areas of moderately eroded Herndon soils with silty clay loam or clay loam
surface layers
Random areas of surface stones and boulders shown with special symbols
Badin soils that have depth to soft bedrock 20 to 40 inches on small knolls and on the
outer edge of map units
Similar:
Random areas of Herndon soils with gravelly or cobbly surface layers
Random areas of Georgeville soils that have red subsoils
Random areas of very deep soils that have clayey subsoil layers less than 24 inches thick
or extend to less than 30 inches in depth.
Random areas of Herndon soils that have loam or very fine sandy loam surface layers
Land Use
Dominant uses: Woodland,pasture and hayland, and cropland
Other uses: Urban development
Agriculture
Cropland
Suitability: Well suited
Commonly grown crops: Corn, soybeans, small grain and tobacco
Management concerns: Erodibility
Management measures and considerations:
Resource management systems that include terraces and diversions, striperopping,
contour tillage, no-till farming, and crop residue management help to control soil erosion
and surface runoff and maximize the infiltration of rainfall.
Pasture and hayland
Suitability: Well suited
Commonly grown crops: Tall fescue, orchardgrass and clover
Management concerns: Erodibility
Management measures and considerations:
Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to control soil erosion and
increase germination.

Fencing livestock away from creeks and streams helps to prevent streambank erosion and
sedimentation.
Planting adapted species helps to ensure the production of high-quality forage and
minimize soil erosion.
The timely removal of livestock from pastures so that forage plants can recover before
winter dormancy helps to maintain pasture and increase productivity.
Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain
pasture and increase productivity.
When establishing,maintaining, or renovating hay and pasture, applying lime and
fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests helps to increase the
availability of plant nutrients and maximize productivity.
Woodland
Suitability: Well suited
Productivity class: Moderately high for loblolly pine
Management concerns:No significant limitations affect woodland management.
Management measures and considerations:
Leaving a buffer zone of trees and shrubs adjacent to streams helps to reduce siltation and
improve aquatic habitat by providing shade for the water surface.
Urban Development
Dwellings
Suitability: Well suited
Management concerns:
Management measures and considerations:
No significant limitations affect dwellings.
Septic tank absorption fields
Suitability: Moderately suited
Management concerns: Restricted permeability
Management measures and considerations:
The Chatham County Health Department should be contacted for guidance on sanitary
facilities.
Increasing the size of septic tank absorption field helps to improve performance.
Installing septic system distribution lines only during dry periods helps to reduce
smearing and sealing of trench walls.
Local roads and streets
Suitability: Moderately suited
Management concerns: Low strength
Management measures and considerations:
Incorporating sand and gravel with the soil material and compacting roadbeds helps to
improve soil strength.
Recreational Development
Camp areas
Suitability: Well suited
Management concerns: Well suited
Management measures and considerations:
No significant limitations affect camp areas.

Picnic areas
Suitability: Well suited
Management concerns: Well suited
Management measures and considerations:
No significant limitations affect picnic areas.
Playgrounds
Suitability: Moderately suited
Management concerns: Steepness of slope
Management measures and considerations:
Vegetating cleared and graded areas as soon as possible helps to maintain soil stability
and prevent erosion.
Leaving a buffer zone of grass, trees, and shrubs adjacent to streams and drainageways
helps to reduce siltation and provides shade.
Cutting, filling, or grading only areas requiring excavation improves soil stability and
reduces equipment limitations caused by the slope.
Rake playground areas to remove small stones
Paths and trails
Suitability: Poorly suited
Management concerns: Erodibility
Management measures and considerations:
Designing paths and trails on the contour and providing adequate water-control
structures, such as culverts, help to maintain the stability of trails.
Interpretive Groups
Land capability classification: IIe
Woodland ordination symbol: 8A for loblolly pine

SOIL SURVEY OF ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA; ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Crawford Dairy Tract 312
657200 658000 J 6K l 659000 669200
AP-
IV
!� d
7 • T i
o O
• 01 Ol O
O
• T
O �• � n
O C:
IO r D
M w
656600 656800 657000 55Y2CG W4CID 657600 637800 658000 r:5A2CC uljUDD 658600 658800 65400 6592ilG
mmmml--�� Meters Feet
0 100 200 400 0 350 700 1,400 2,100 2,800
USDA.Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1.1 4/24/2007
Conservation service National Cooperative Soil Survey Paget of 3

SOIL SURVEY OF ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA; ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Crawford Dairy Tract 312
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Soil Map Units
o cities Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
L—� Detailed Counties Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
Detailed States
Interstate Highways Coordinate System: UTM Zone 17
Roads Soil Survey Area: Alamance County, North Carolina
—*---�— Rails Spatial Version of Data: 5
Water Soil Map Compilation Scale: 1:12000
Hydrography
Oceans Soil Survey Area: Orange County, North Carolina
AVAYAY# Escarpment,bedrock Spatial Version of Data: 2
v�v�vA� Escarpment,non-bedrock Soil Map Compilation Scale: 1:20000
^-^- Gulley
uuuunnw Levee
•...•.. Slope
v Blowout
IR Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
♦ Depression,closed
Eroded Spot
x Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
^- Gulley
Lava Flow
9 Landfill Map comprised of aerial images photographed on these dates:
11. Marsh or Swamp 1/30/1993; 3/1/1993
op Miscellaneous Water
v Rock Outcrop
+ Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
$ Slide or Slip
O Sinkhole
ff Sodic Spot
Spoil Area The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and
t) Stony Spot digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps.
As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
O Perennial Water
USDA Natural Resources yr Wet Spot Web Soil Survey 1.1 4/24/2007
i70" Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Survey of Alamance County,North Carolina;Orange County,North Carolina Crawford Dairy Tract 312
Map Unit Legend Summary
Alamance County,North Carolina
No map data available for this soil survey area.
Orange County,North Carolina
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Ch Chewacla loam 36.1 7.7
Cp Congaree fine sandy loam 4.5 1.0
EnB Enon loam,2 to 6 percent slopes 8.1 1.7
EnC Enon loam,6 to 12 percent slopes 9.4 2.0
GeB Georgeville silt loam,2 to 6 percent 170.8 36.3
slopes
GeC Georgeville silt loam,6 to 10 103.6 22.0
percent slopes
HrB Herndon silt loam,2 to 6 percent 10.4 2.2
slopes
HrC Herndon silt loam,6 to 10 percent 6.7 1.4
slopes
Lignum silt loam,0 to 3 percent 8.8 1.9
slopes
TaD Tatum silt loam,8 to 15 percent 62.2 13.2
slopes
TaE Tatum silt loam, 15 to 25 percent 19.3 4.1
slopes
W Water 10.4 2.2
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1.1 4/24/2007
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

ApG
+QgHaw Ivy A a '
P P-� Fn '
1 0 - eB �A C PC
- _ �' ChA q Ar36 r -f
+.+VEf3
1
eS
' WWe
r. Na •, ,� -fir:rt;•'
;( He B' G' C'
�>a: � jam' •EJ, � � �::��1 ,` ,_
UP aE3
GaB
- 'IS•��' tT. �• - .� r'' ,. ,�� �• .�1,, [. •! L �.. .i - .rid'�y '�i
E" _ _,,�.• 'GeC
'`• •� � .�1�. ¢� ,� �� .. - ,�' ��"��' - .vim ., �g
NaC
;;,• �' �S,''y' ,. . '�•'
qP Gk
,l'Alf
�' r `
i I 11 11 :I 1 I 111 111 111 111

SOIL SURVEY OF ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA; CHATHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA; ORANGE
COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Crawford Dairy tracts 2346,2358,2359,2530,2533
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Soil Map Units
o Cities Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Detailed Counties Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
Detailed States
Interstate Highways Coordinate System: UTM Zone 17
Roads Soil Survey Area: Alamance County, North Carolina
++ Rails Spatial Version of Data: 5
`"later Soil Map Compilation Scale: 1:12000
Hydrography
Oceans Soil Survey Area: Chatham County, North Carolina
AYAYAYAY Escarpment,bedrock Spatial Version of Data: 4
vAvAvA� Escarpment,non-bedrock Soil Map Compilation Scale: .1:24000
Gulley
nunuuuw Levee Soil Survey Area: Orange County, North Carolina
•••••••••• Slope Spatial Version of Data: 2
tv Blowout Soil Map Compilation Scale: 1:20000
® Borrow Pit
X, Clay Spot
• Depression,closed
Eroded Spot
x Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Gulley
Lava Flow
® Landfill Map comprised of aerial images photographed on these dates:
�L Marsh or Swamp 1/3011993; 3/1/1993
O Miscellaneous Water
Rock Outcrop
+ Saline Spot
. Sandy Spot
Slide or Slip
0 Sinkhole
* Sodic Spot
Spoil Area The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and
o Stony Spot digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps.
As a result,some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
p Perennial Water
USDA Natural Resources W Wet Spot Web Soil Survey 1.1 4/24/2007
'� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of S

Soil Survey of Alamance County,North Carolina;Cnatham County,North Carolina;Orange County,North Carolina Crawford Dairy tracts 2346,2358,2359,2530,2533
Map Unit Legend Summary
Alamance County, North Carolina
No map data available for this soil survey area.
Chatham County,North Carolina
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
BaE Badin-Nanford complex, 15 to 30 39.4 2.0
percent slopes
ChA Chewacla and Wehadkee soils,0 to 22.7 1.2
2 percent slopes,frequently flooded
CkC Cid silt loam,6 to 10 percent slopes 5.4 0.3
CmB Cid-Lignum complex,2 to 6 166.1 8.6
percent slopes
GaB Georgeville silt loam,2 to 6 percent 132.3 6.9
slopes
GaC Georgeville silt loam,6 to 10 103.8 5.4
percent slopes
GeB2 Georgeville silty clay loam,2 to 6 133.0 6.9
percent slopes,moderately eroded
GeC2 Georgeville silty clay loam,6 to 10 94.1 4.9
percent slopes,moderately eroded
GkD Georgeville-Badin complex, 10 to 43.1 2.2
15 percent slopes
GoC Goldston-Badin complex,2 to 15 4.2 0.2
percent slopes
HeB Helena sandy loam,2 to 6 percent 122.7 6.4
slopes
HeC Helena sandy loam,6 to 10 percent 34.7 1.8
slopes
HrB Herndon silt loam,2 to 6 percent 51.6 2.7
slopes
HrC Herndon silt loam,6 to 10 percent 8.4 0.4
slopes
NaB Nanford-Badin complex,2 to 6 80.8 4.2
percent slopes
NaC Nanford-Badin complex,6 to 10 56.2 2.9
percent slopes
NaD Nanford-Badin complex, 10 to 15 30.8 1.6
percent slopes
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1.1 4/24/2007
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5

Soil Survey of Alamancc County,North Carolina;Chatham County,North Carolina;Orange County,North Carolina Crawford Dairy tracts 2346,2358,2359,2530,2533
Chatham County,North Carolina
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
RvA Riverview silt loam,0 to 3 percent 62.2 3.2
slopes,frequently flooded
StB State sandy loam,2 to 6 percent 10.7 0.6
slopes
VaB Vance sandy loam,2 to 6 percent 41.1 2.1
slopes
W Water 48.9 2.5
WeB Wedowee sandy loam,2 to 6 65.3 3.4
percent slopes
WeC Wedowee sandy loam,6 to 10 72.3 3.7
percent slopes
WeD Wedowee sandy loam, 10 to 15 48.2 2.5
percent slopes
WeE Wedowee sandy loam, 15 to 25 8.8 0.5
percent slopes
Orange County,North Carolina
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
ApB Appling sandy loam,2 to 6 73.1 3.8
percent slopes
ApC Appling sandy loam,6 to 10 37.8 2.0
percent slopes
Ch Chewacla loam 32.3 1.7
Cp Congaree fine sandy loam 2.7 0.1
EnB Enon loam,2 to 6 percent 18.6 1.0
slopes
EnC Enon loam,6 to 12 percent 1.2 0.1
slopes
HeB Helena sandy loam,2 to 8 1.1 0.1
percent slopes
HrB Herndon silt loam,2 to 6 10.3 0.5
percent slopes
HrC Herndon silt loam,6 to 10 17.9 0.9
percent slopes
Or Orange silt loam,0 to 3 0.1 0.0
percent slopes
`•i . Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1.1 4/24/2007
--_-` Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 5

Soil Survey of Alamance County,North Carolina;Chatham County,North Carolina;Orange County,North Carolina Crawford Dairy tracts 2346,2358,2359,2530,2533
Orange County,North Carolina
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
TaD Tatum silt loam,8 to 15 1.5 0.1
percent slopes
W Water 0.9 0.0
J�3DA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1.1 4/24/2007
r Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 5

Conservation Plan Map Date:4/17/2007
Customer(s): JERRY W CRAWFORD Field Office: PITTSBORO SERVICE CENTER
Agency: USDA Service Center
District: CHATHAM SOIL&WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Assisted By: Carl Outz
Ai
-- '_ � •,fir _
�c
y,ft
t
�
� 4qE► •�
Of
,�l. a ,� ' � • � , � +
;Legend
Consplan 1
Roads
Streams
o practice—instance—point
— practice_instance_polyline
n practice_instance_polygon
L land—unit
Water bodies N
FSA_CLU 190 0 190 380 570 760
�� Feel

1 _
L ! a
�i i r •�' r' � r.
� t7r�;� ,;• .,'• � 4{ .its- - ,� Y - r.��! r ' •. :•s
.' `►ti+ jai �'� �� r
Ak
•:
8 + - • 22. r�r
J
1-0
x n • ¢,� 1V
•

Jtr
.:
f,
r . •:- Per: � �''►;
.. T 1 •' r .r. -.1
K
q•�'•i• 'ti.l•ter f'/`• � s���' - „
Tract 2533
� '� ��a f�..i -k � �. �' •�
�#�' `t� �� .� •+ iF'� •• _ ~ tip•.• 'w _ - c _ •� `T.
fit., •"�., -_ ;: .-#^.�-�� _ -
�`' 1^• LF 1

OI V RCSPITTSBORO SERVICE CENTER CARL HENRY OUTZ JR.
Natural 45 SOUTH ST STE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST
Resources Conservation PITTSBORO NC 27312-5684
Service 9195422244 ext. 100
Conservation Plan
JERRY W CRAWFORD
4085 CRAWFORD DAIRY RD 1
CHAPEL HILL, NC 27516
Pasture
Tract: 2346
Forage Harvest Management
Cutting and removal of forages from the field as hay, greenchop, of ensilage.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 10.9 ac 5 2007
2 37.4 ac 51 2007
Total: 48.3 ac f
Nutrient Management
Manage the amount, form, placement and timing of plant nutrient application.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
11 10.9 ac 5 2007
2 37.4 ac 5 2007
Total: 48.3 ac
Nutrient Management
Manage the amount, form, placement, and timing of fertilizer in this (these)field(s). Accomplish this
management by conducting an inventory of nutrients already on your farm and comparing them against
the realistic needs of the crops you grow. Realisti
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 10.9 ac 91 2003
2 37.4 ac 91 2003
Total: 48.3 ac
4/20/2007 Page 1 of 3

Waste Utilization
Apply dairy waste according to soil test and waste analysis. Broadcast dairy waste on fields in
accordance to required nutrients shown on soil test for selected crops or in waste utilization plan.
Incorporate by disking into soil within two days. Split
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 10.9 ac 1 91 2003 10.9 ac 3/1/2004
2 37.4 ac 91 2003 37.4 ac 3/1/2004
Total: 48.3 ac 48.3 ac
Waste Utilization
Use organic waste material in an environmentally safe manner to enrich soil fertility.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
_ 1. 10.9 ac 1 51 2007
21 37.4 ac 5 20071 I
Total:j 48.3 ac I I
4/20/2007 Page 2 of 3

CERTIFICATION OF PARTICIPANTS
'Z�- lr �Jati a`l
E Y W CRAVfORD DATE
CERTIFICATION OF:
ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Ciod b�ek�Li CU /a4 h�
CARL HENRY O Tz'j�)o DATE CHATHAM SOIL&WATER CONS DATE
PUBLIC BURDEN STATEMENT
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,an agency may not conduct or sponsor,and a person is not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collections is
0578-0013. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 45/0.75 minutes per response,including the
time for reviewing instructions,searching existing data sources,gathering and maintaining the data needed,and completing and reviewing
the collection information.
PRIVACY ACT
The above statements are made in accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974(5 U.S.0 522a). Furnishing this information is voluntary;
however failure to furnish correct,complete information will result in the withholding or withdrawal of such technical or financial assistance.
The information may be furnished to other USDA agencies,the Internal Revenue Service,the Department of Justice,or other state or
federal law enforcement agencies,or in response to orders of a court,magistrate,or administrative tribunal.
USDA NON-DISCRIMINATION STATEMENT
"The U.S.Department of Agriculture(USDA)prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race,color, national
origin,age,disability,and where applicable,sex,marital status,family status,parental status,religion,sexual orientation,genetic
information,political beliefs, reprisal,or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program.(Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.)Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program
information(Braille, large print,audiotape,etc.)should contact USDA's TARGET Center at(202)720-2600(voice and TDD). To file a
complaint of discrimination,write USDA,Director,Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue,S.W.,Washington, DC 20250-9410 or
call(800)795-3272(voice)or(202)720-6382(TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer."
4/20/2007 Page 3 of 3

Qj N RCSPITTSBORO SERVICE CENTER CARL HENRY OUTZ JR.
Natural 45 SOUTH ST STE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST
Resources Conservation PITTSBORO NC 27312-5684
Service 9195422244 ext. 100
Conservation Plan
JERRY W CRAWFORD
4085 CRAWFORD DAIRY RD
CHAPEL HILL, NC 27516
I
1
Crop
Tract: 2358
329
Conservation tilled row crops will be planted with a minimum of 50% ground cover remaining on the soil
surface after planting.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 22.4 ac-ft 71 2001 22 ac-ft 7/2/2001
2 8.6 ac-ft 71 2001 8.6 ac-ft 7/2/2001
Total: 31 ac-ft 30.6 ac-ft
Conservation Crop Rotation
Begin a two year cropping system of first year conservation tilled row crops followed by small grain and
double cropped conservation tilled row crops the second year.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 22.4 ac 71 2001 22.4 ac 7/2/2001
2 8.6 ac 71 2001 8.6 ac 7/2/2001
Total: 31 ac 31 ac
Conservation Crop Rotation
Grow crops in a planned rotation for biodiversity and to provide adequate amounts of organic material for
erosion reduction, nutrient balance and sustained soil organic matter.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 22.4 ac 51 2007 1
2 8.6 ac 5 2007
Total: 31 ac
4/20/2007 Page 1 of 4

Nutrient Management
Manage the amount, form, placement and timing of plant nutrient application.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 22.4 ac 51 2007
2 8.6 ac 51 2007
Total: 31 ac
Nutrient Management
Manage the amount, form, placement, and timing of fertilizer in this (these)field(s). Accomplish this
management by conducting an inventory of nutrients already on your farm and comparing them against
the realistic needs of the crops you grow. Realisti
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 22.4 ac 91 2003
2 8.6 ac 91 2003 1
Total: 31 ac
Residue and Tillage Management, No-Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed
Manage organic residue so maximum amounts are left on the soil surface on a year-round basis. Plant
crops in narrow slots or narrow tilled strips in previously untilled soil.
t Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 22.4 ac 5 2007
2 8.6 ac 5 2007
Total: 31 ac
Residue Management, Seasonal
Maintain at least a 30%ground cover of plant residue on the soil surface from harvest until 30 days before
the succeeding crop is planted.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 22.4 ac 71 2001 22.4 ac 7/2/2001
2 8.6 ac 71 2001 8.6 ac 7/2/2001
Total: 31 ac 31 ac
Residue Management,Seasonal
Manage amount, orientation and distribution of organic residue to maximize soil protection until
immediately prior to planting the following crop.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 22.4 ac 51 2007
2 8.6 ac 51 2007
Total: 31 ac
4/20/2007 Page 2 of 4

Waste Utilization
Apply dairy waste according to soil test and waste analysis. Broadcast dairy waste on fields in
accordance to required nutrients shown on soil test for selected crops or in waste utilization plan.
Incorporate by disking into soil within two days. Split
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 22.4 ac 91 2003 22.4 ac 3/1/2004
2 8.6 ac 9 2003 8.6 ac 3/1/2004
Total: 31 ac 31 ac 1
Waste Utilization
Use organic waste material in an environmentally safe manner to enrich soil fertility.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 22.4 ac 51 2007
2 8.6 ac 51 2007
Total: 31 ac
4/20/2007 Page 3 of 4

CERTIFICATION OF PARTICIPANTS
Z-4 • �� �y t77
E Y W CRA7nbf DATE
CERTIFICATION OF:
ENVIRONMENTA1L SPECIALIST CONSERVATION DISTRICT
I 4 a-► d
CARL HENRYIOUTZ DATE CHATHAM SOIL&WATER CONS DATE
PUBLIC BURDEN STATEMENT
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,an agency may not conduct or sponsor,and a person.is not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collections is
0578-0013. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 45/0.75 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions,searching existing data sources,gathering and maintaining the data needed,and completing and reviewing
the collection information.
PRIVACY ACT
The above statements are made in accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974(5 U.S.0 522a). Furnishing this information is voluntary;
however failure to furnish correct,complete information will result in the withholding or withdrawal of such technical or financial assistance.
The information may be furnished to other USDA agencies,the Internal Revenue Service,the Department of Justice,or other state or
federal law enforcement agencies,or in response to orders of a court,magistrate,or administrative tribunal.
USDA NON-DISCRIMINATION STATEMENT
"The U.S.Department of Agriculture(USDA)prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race,color, national
origin,age,.disability,and where applicable,sex,marital status,family status,parental status, religion,sexual orientation,genetic
information,political beliefs,reprisal,or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program.(Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.)Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program
information(Braille,large print,audiotape,etc.)should contact USDA's TARGET Center at(202)720-2600(voice and TDD). To file a
complaint of discrimination,write USDA, Director,Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue,S.W.,Washington,DC 20250-9410 or
call(800)795-3272(voice)or(202)720-6382(TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer."
4/20/2007 Page 4 of 4

-0j 1 V RCS PITTSBORO SERVICE CENTER CARL HENRY OUTZ JR.
Natural 45 SOUTH ST STE 1 ENVIRONMENATL SPECIALIST
Resources Conservation PITTSBORO NC 27312-5684
Service 9195422244 ext. 100
Conservation Plan
JERRY W CRAWFORD
4085 CRAWFORD DAIRY RD
CHAPEL HILL, NC 27516
Crop
Tract: 2359
Conservation Crop Rotation
Grow crops in a planned rotation for biodiversity and to provide adequate amounts of organic material for
erosion reduction, nutrient balance and sustained soil organic matter.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 8.8 ac 51 2007
2 4.7 ac 5 2007
Total: 13.5 ac
Nutrient Management
Manage the amount, form, placement and timing of plant nutrient application.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
11 8.8 ac 51 2007
21i 4.7 ac 5 2007
Total:] 13.5 ac
Nutrient Management
Manage the amount, form, placement, and timing of fertilizer in this(these) field(s). Accomplish this
management by conducting an inventory of nutrients already on your farm and comparing them against
the realistic needs of the crops you grow. Realisti
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 8.8 ac 91 2003 1
2 4.7 ac 91 2003
Total: 13.5 ac
4/20/2007 Page 1 of 3

Residue and Tillage Management, No-Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed
Manage organic residue so maximum amounts are left on the soil surface on a year-round basis. Plant
crops in narrow slots or narrow tilled strips in previously untilled soil.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 8.8 ac 51 2007
2j 4.7 ac 51 2007
Total: 13.5 ac
Residue Management, Seasonal
Manage amount, orientation and distribution of organic residue to maximize soil protection until
immediately prior to planting the following crop.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
11 8.8 ac 5 2007
21 4.7 ac 51 2007
Total: 13.5 ac
Waste Utilization
Apply dairy waste according to soil test and waste analysis. Broadcast dairy waste on fields in
accordance to required nutrients shown on soil test for selected crops or in waste utilization plan.
Incorporate by disking into soil within two.days. Split
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 8.8 ac 91 2003 8.8 ac 3/1/2004
2 4.7 ac 91 2003 4.7 ac 3/1/2004
Total: 13.5 ac 13.5 ac
Waste Utilization
Use organic waste material in an environmentally safe manner to enrich soil fertility.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 8.8 ac 51 2007
2 4.7 ac 51 2007
Total: 13.5 ac
4/20/2007 Page 2 of 3

CERTIFICATION OF PARTICIPANTS
el Yo y1ajl
RqY W CRAW F RD DATE
CERTIFICATION OF:
ENVI�R�ONMENATL SPECIALIST CONSERVATION DISTRICT
PL
CARL HENRY UTZ DATE CHATHAM SOIL &WATER CONS DATE
PUBLIC BURDEN STATEMENT
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,an agency may not conduct or sponsor,and a person is not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collections is
0578-0013. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 45/0.75 minutes per response,including the
time for reviewing instructions,searching existing data sources,gathering and maintaining the data needed,and completing and reviewing
the collection information.
PRIVACY ACT
The above statements are made in accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974(5 U.S.0 522a). Furnishing this information is voluntary;
owever failure to furnish correct,complete information will result in the withholding or withdrawal of such technical or financial assistance.
The information may be furnished to other USDA agencies,the Internal Revenue Service,the Department of Justice,or other state or
federal law enforcement agencies,or in response to orders of a court,magistrate,or administrative tribunal.
USDA NON-DISCRIMINATION STATEMENT
"The U.S. Department of Agriculture(USDA)prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race,color, national
crigin,age,disability,and where applicable,sex,marital status,family status,parental status,religion,sexual orientation,genetic
information,political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program.(Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.)Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program
information(Braille,large print,audiotape,etc.)should contact USDA's TARGET Center at(202)720-2600(voice and TDD). To file a
complaint of discrimination,write USDA,Director,Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue,S.W.,Washington,DC 20250-9410 or
call(800)795-3272(voice)or(202)720-6382(TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer."
4/20/2007 Page 3 of 3

4 N RCSPITTSBORO SERVICE CENTER CARL HENRY OUTZ JR
Natural 45 SOUTH ST STE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST
Resources Conservation PITTSBORO, NC 27312-5684
Service 9195422244 ext. 100
Conservation Plan
JERRY W CRAWFORD
4085 CRAWFORD DAIRY RD
CHAPEL HILL, NC 27516
Crop
Tract: 2530
329
Conservation tilled row crops will be planted with a minimum of 50% ground cover remaining on the soil
surface after planting.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 26.7 ac-ft 12 1991 26.7 ac-ft 5/8/1994
3 3.6 ac-ft 12 1991 3.6 ac-ft 5/8/1994
6 29.9 ac-ft 12 1991 29.9 ac-ft 5/8/1994
7 6.3 ac-ft 12 1991 29.9 ac-ft 5/8/1994
81 12.7 ac-ft 12 1991
121 40.1 ac-ft 12 1991 40.1 ac-ft 5/8/1994
Total: 119.3 ac-ft 106.6 ac-ft
330A
Run rows and perform all tillage operations across the dominant slope.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 26.7 ac-ft 12 1991
3 3.6 ac-ft 12 1991
6 29.9 ac-ft 12 1991
7 6.3 ac-ft 12 1991
8 12.7 ac-ft 12 1991
12 40.1 ac-ft 121 1991
Total: 119.3 ac-ft
4/23/2007 Page 1 of 7

411
Seed either 25 lbs./ac grass, 25 lbs./ac legume, or 12 lbs./ac grass-8 lbs./ac legume mixture immediately
following row crop harvest. Sod maybe established by intermixing seeding with small grain. The sod will
remain in the field at least twenty four mont
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
13 9.3 ac-ft 12 1989 9.3 ac-ft 2/5/1989
Total: 9.3 ac-ft 9.3 ac-ft
Conservation Crop Rotation
Begin a two year cropping system of first year conservation tilled row crops followed by small grain and
double cropped conservation tilled row crops the second year.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 26.7 ac 12 1991 26.7 ac 5/8/1994
3 3.6 ac 12 1991 3.6 ac 5/8/1994
6 29.9 ac 12 1991 29.9 ac 5/8/1994
7 6.3 ac 12 1991 29.9 ac 5/8/1994
8 12.7 ac 12 1991 12.7 ac 5/8/1994
12 40.1 ac 12 1991 40.1 ac 5/8/1994
13 9.3 ac 12 1989 9.3 ac 2/5/1989
Total: 128.6 ac 128.6 ac
Grassed Waterway
Maintain existing grassed waterways by annual fertilization and mowing. Repair all gullies and bare areas
as needed with sod or by reseeding.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
61 1 ac 12_ 19891
Total: 1 ac _ 1
Nutrient Management
Manage the amount, form, placement and timing of plant nutrient application.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 26.7 ac 5 2007
3 3.6 ac 5 2007
6 29.9 ac 5 2007
7 6.3 ac 5 2007
8 12.7 ac 5 2007
12 40.1 ac 51 2007
13 9.3 ac 5 2007
Total: 128.6 ac
4/23/2007 Page 2 of 7

Nutrient Management
Manage the amount, form, placement, and timing of fertilizer in this (these)field(s). Accomplish this
management by conducting an inventory of nutrients already on your farm and comparing them against
the realistic needs of the crops you grow. Realisti
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 26.7 ac 9 2003
3 3.6 ac 9 2003
6 29.9 ac 9 2003
7 6.3 ac 9 2003
8 12.7 ac 9 2003
12 40.1 ac 9 2003
13 9.3 ac 9 2003
Total: 128.6 ac
Residue Management, Seasonal
Maintain at least a 30% ground cover of plant residue on the soil surface from harvest until 30 days before
the succeeding crop is planted.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 26.7 ac 12 1991 26.7 ac 5/8/1994
3 3.6 ac 12 1991 3.6 ac 5/8/1994
6 29.9 ac 12 1991 29.9 ac 5/8/1994
7 6.3 ac 12 1991 29.9 ac 5/8/1994
8 12.7 ac 12 1991 12.7 ac 5/8/1994
12 40.1 ac 121 1991 40.1 ac 5/8/1994
Total: 119.3 ac 119.3 ac
Residue Management, Seasonal
When sod is used in the rotation, delay sod destruction until late fall or early winter just prior to row crop
year. Land will be left with a rough surface, delaying disking and final seedbed preparation until just prior
to crop planting.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
131 9.3 ac 121 1989 9.3 ac 2/5/1989
Total:1 9.3 ac 9.3 ac 1
4/23/2007 Page 3 of 7

Waste Utilization
Apply dairy waste according to soil test and waste analysis. Broadcast dairy waste on fields in
accordance to required nutrients shown on soil test for selected crops or in waste utilization plan.
Incorporate by disking into soil within two days. Split
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 26.7 ac 9 2003 26.7 ac 3/1/2004
3 3.6 ac 9 2003 3.6 ac 311/2004
6 29.9 ac 9 2003 29.9 ac 3/1/2004
7 6.3 ac 9 2003 6.3 ac 3/1/2004
8 12.7 ac 9 2003 12.7 ac 3/1/2004
12 40.1 ac 9 2003 40.1 ac 3/1/2004
13 9.3 ac 9 2003 9.3 ac 3/1/2004
Total: 128.6 ac 128.6 ac
Waste Utilization
Use organic waste material in an environmentally safe manner to enrich soil fertility.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 26.7 ac 5 2007
3 3.6 ac 5 2007
6 29.9 ac 5 2007
7 6.3 ac 5 2007
7 6.3 ac 5 2009
8 12.7 ac 5 2007
12 40.1 ac 5 2007
13 9.3 ac 5 2007
Total: 128.6 ac
Pasture
Tract: 2530
510
Maintain perennial grasses or Legume-grass mixture by annual fertilization and mowing.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
41 4 ac-ft 12 1989 4 ac-ft 2/5/1989
51 25.4 ac-ft 12 1989 25.4 ac-ft 2/5/1989
9 4.5 ac-ft 12 1989 4.5 ac-ft 2/5/1989
10 4.5 ac-ft 12 1989 4.5 ac-ft 2/5/1989
11 20.6 ac-ft 12 1989 20.6 ac-ft 2/5/1989
Total: 59 ac-ft 59 ac-ft
4/23/2007 Page 4 of 7

Forage Harvest Management
Maintain perennial grasses or Legume-grass mixture by annual fertilization and mowing.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
2 4.2 ac 121 1989 4.2 ac 2/5/1989
Total: 4.2 ac �� 4.2 ac
Nutrient Management
Manage the amount, form, placement and timing of plant nutrient application.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
2 4.2 ac 5 2007
4 4 ac 5 2007
5 25.4 ac 5 2007
9 4.5 ac 5 2007
10 4.5 ac 5 2007
11 20.6 ac 5 2007
Total: 63.2 ac
Nutrient Management
Manage the amount, form, placement, and timing of fertilizer in this (these)field(s). Accomplish this
management by conducting an inventory of nutrients already on your farm and comparing them against
the realistic needs of the crops you grow. Realisti
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
2 4.2 ac 9 2003
4 4 ac 9 2003
5 25.4 ac 9 2003
9 4.5 ac 9 2003
10 4.5 ac 9 2003
ill 20.6 ac 9 2003
Total: 63.2 ac
Waste Utilization
Apply dairy waste according to soil test and waste analysis. Broadcast dairy waste on fields in
accordance to required nutrients shown on soil test for selected crops or in waste utilization plan.
Incorporate by disking into soil within two days. Split
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
2 4.2 ac 91 2003 4.2 ac 3/l/2004
4 4 ac 9 2003 4 ac 3/1/2004
5 25.4 ac 9 2003 25.4 ac 3/l/2004
9 4.5 ac 9 2003 4.5 ac 3/l/2004
10 4.5 ac 9 2003 4.5 ac 3/1/2004
11 20.6 ac 9 2003 20.6 ac 3/l/2004
Total: 63.2 ac 63.2 ac
4/23/2007 Page 5 of 7

Waste Utilization
Use organic waste material in an environmentally safe manner to enrich soil fertility.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
2 4.2 ac 5 2007
4 4 ac 5 2007
5 25.4 ac 5 2007
9 4.5 ac 5 2007
10 4.5 ac 5 2007
ill 20.6 ac 51 2007
Total: 63.2 ac
Watering Facility
A trough or tank, with needed devices for water control and waste water disposal, installed to provide
drinking water for livestock, according to NRCS specifications.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
51 1 no 1 61 2003
Total: 1 no
4/23/2007 Page 6 of 7

CERTIFICATION OF PARTICIPANTS
R Y kRArRD DATE
CERTIFICATION OF:
ENVIRON,MENTA SPECIALIST CONSERVATION DISTRICT
C
�
6,41
&C14 ail 61 _
CARL HENRY UTZ R DATE CHATHAM SOIL&WATER CONS DATE
PUBLIC BURDEN STATEMENT
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor,and a person is not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collections is
0578-0013. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 45/0.75 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources,gathering and maintaining the data needed,and completing and reviewing
the collection information.
PRIVACY ACT
The above statements are made in accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974(5 U.S.0 522a). Furnishing this information is voluntary;
however failure to furnish correct,complete information will result in the withholding or withdrawal of such technical.or financial assistance.
The information may be furnished to other USDA agencies,the Internal Revenue Service,the Department of Justice,or other state or
federal law enforcement agencies,or in response to orders of a court,magistrate, or administrative tribunal.
USDA NON-DISCRIMINATION STATEMENT
"The U.S.Department of Agriculture(USDA)prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race,color,national
origin,age,disability,and where applicable,sex,marital status,family status,parental status,religion,sexual orientation,genetic
information,political beliefs, reprisal,or because all or apart of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program.(Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.)Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program
information(Braille,large print,audiotape,etc.)should contact USDA's TARGET Center at(202)720-2600(voice and TDD). To file a
complaint of discrimination,write USDA,Director,Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue,S.W.,Washington,DC 20250-9410 or
call(800)795-3272(voice)or(202)720-6382(TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer."
4/23/2007 Page 7 of 7

Q; N RCSPITTSBORO SERVICE CENTER CARL HENRY OUTZ JR
Natural 45 SOUTH ST STE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST
Resources Conservation PITTSBORO NC 27312-5684
Service 9195422244 ext. 100
Conservation Plan
JERRY W CRAWFORD
4085 CRAWFORD DAIRY RD
CHAPEL HILL, NC 27516
Crop
Tract: 2533
329
Conservation tilled row crops will be planted with a minimum of 50%ground cover remaining on the soil
surface after planting.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 19.8 ac-ft 1 71 2001 19.8 ac-ft 7/2/2001
2 25.4 ac-ft 7 2001 25.4 ac-ft 7/2/2001
Total: 45.2 ac-ft 45.2 ac-ft
Conservation Crop Rotation
Begin a two year cropping system of first year conservation tilled row crops followed by small grain and
double cropped conservation tilled row crops the second year.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
I_ 1 J 19.8 ac 1 7 2001 19.8 ac 7/2/2001
2 25.4 ac 7 2001 25.4 ac 7/2/2001
Total: 45.2 ac T 45.2 ac
Grassed Waterway
Maintain existing grassed waterways by annual fertilization and mowing. Repair all gullies and bare areas
as needed with sod or by reseeding.
[ Planned Applied Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
I 11 0.5 ac --121 19911 0.5 ac 7/24/1991
Total:j 0.5 ac 0.5 ac
4/23/2007 Page 1 of 3

Nutrient Management
Manage the amount, form, placement and timing of plant nutrient application.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 19.8 ac 5 2007
2 25.4 ac 5 2007
Total: 45.2 ac
Nutrient Management
Manage the amount, form, placement, and timing of fertilizer in this (these)field(s). Accomplish this
management by conducting an inventory of nutrients already on your farm and comparing them against
the realistic needs of the crops you grow. Realisti
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
11 19.8 ac 9 2003
21 25.4 ac 9 2003
Total: 45.2.ac
Residue Management, Seasonal
Maintain at least a 30%ground cover of plant residue on the soil surface from harvest until 30 days before
the succeeding crop is planted.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 19.8 ac 7 2001 19.8 ac 7/2/2001
2 25.4 ac 7 2001 25.4 ac 7/2/2001
Total: 45.2 ac 45.2 ac
Waste Utilization
Apply dairy waste according to soil test and waste analysis. Broadcast dairy waste on fields in
accordance to required nutrients shown on soil test for selected crops or in waste utilization plan.
Incorporate by disking into soil within two days. Split
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 19.8 ac 9 2003 19.8 ac 3/1/2004
2 25.4 ac 91 2003 25.4 ac 3/1/2004
Total: 45.2 ac 45.2 ac
Waste Utilization
Use organic waste material in an environmentally safe manner to enrich soil fertility.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 19.8 ac 5 2007
2 25.4 ac d
5 2007
Total: 45.2 ac
4/23/2007 Page 2 of 3

CERTIFICATION OF PARTICIPANTS
i
ER Y W CRA OR DATE
CERTIFICATION OF:
ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST CONSERVATION DISTRICT
f1 Ll JoLq IDI
CARL HENRY okJTZ R DATE CHATHAM SOIL&WATER CONS DATE
PUBLIC BURDEN STATEMENT
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,an agency may not conduct or sponsor,and a person is not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collections is
1,1578-0013. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 45/0.75 minutes per response,including the
time for reviewing instructions,searching existing data sources,gathering and maintaining the data needed,and completing and reviewing
the collection information.
PRIVACY ACT
The above statements are made in accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974(5 U.S.0 522a). Furnishing this information is voluntary;
however failure to furnish correct,complete information will result in the withholding or withdrawal of such technical or financial assistance.
The information may be furnished to other USDA agencies,the Internal Revenue Service,the Department of Justice,or other state or
tederal law enforcement agencies,or in response to orders of a court,magistrate,or administrative tribunal.
USDA NON-DISCRIMINATION STATEMENT
"The U.S. Department of Agriculture(USDA)prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race,color,national
origin,age,disability,and where applicable,sex,marital status,family status, parental status,religion,sexual orientation,genetic
information,political beliefs, reprisal,or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program.(Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.)Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program
information(Braille, large print, audiotape,etc.)should contact USDA's TARGET Center at(202)720-2600(voice and TDD). To file a
complaint of discrimination,write USDA, Director,Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue,S.W.,Washington,DC 20250-9410 or
call(800)795-3272(voice)or(202)720-6382(TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer."
4/23/2007 Page 3 of 3

4,; N RCSPITTSBORO SERVICE CENTER CARL HENRY OUTZ JR
Natural 45 SOUTH ST STE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST
Resources Conservation PITTSBORO, NC 27312-5684
Service 9195422244 ext. 100
Conservation Plan
JERRY W CRAWFORD
4085 CRAWFORD DAIRY RD
CHAPEL HILL, NC 27516
Crop
Tract: 312
Conservation Crop Rotation
Grow crops in a planned rotation for biodiversity and to provide adequate amounts of organic material for
erosion reduction, nutrient balance and sustained soil organic matter.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
4 15 ac 5 2007
6 14.9 ac 5 2007
7 17.9 ac 5 2007
Total: 47.8 ac {
Nutrient Management
Manage the amount, form, placement and timing of plant nutrient application.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
6 14.9 ac 51 2007
7 17.9 ac 5 2007
Total: 32.8 ac
Nutrient Management
Manage the amount, form, placement, and timing of fertilizer in this (these)field(s). Accomplish this
management by conducting an inventory of nutrients already on your farm and comparing them against
the realistic needs of the crops you grow. Realisti
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
41 15 ac 1 91 2003 {
Total:j 15 ac
4/20/2007 Page 1 of 4.

Residue and Tillage Management, No-Till/Strip Till/Direct Seed
Manage organic residue so maximum amounts are left on the soil surface on a year-round basis. Plant
crops in narrow slots or narrow tilled strips in previously untilled soil.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
4 15 ac 5 2007
6 14.9 ac 5 2007
7 17.9 ac 5 2007
Total: 47.8 ac
Residue Management, Seasonal
Manage amount, orientation and distribution of organic residue to maximize soil protection until
immediately prior to planting the following crop.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
4 15 ac 5 2007
6 14.9 ac 5 2007
7 17.9 ac 5 2007
Total: 47.8 ac
Waste Utilization
Apply dairy waste according to soil test and waste analysis. Broadcast dairy waste on fields in
accordance to required nutrients shown on soil test for selected crops or in waste utilization plan.
Incorporate by disking into soil within two days. Split
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
41 15 ac 91 2003 15 ac 3/1/2004
Total:j 15 ac 15 ac
Waste Utilization
Use organic waste material in an environmentally safe manner to enrich soil fertility.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
61 14.9 ac 51 2007
71 17.9 ac 5 2007
Total: 32.8 ac
Pasture
Tract: 312
4/20/2007 Page 2 of 4

Forage Harvest Management
Cutting and removal of forages from the field as hay, greenchop, of ensilage.
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 2.4 ac 5 2007
2 24.3 ac 5 2007
3 8.7 ac 5 2007
5 5 ac 5 2007
8 14.6 ac 5 2007
Total:1 55 ac
Nutrient Management
Manage the amount, form, placement, and timing of fertilizer in this (these)field(s). Accomplish this
management by conducting an inventory of nutrients already on your farm and comparing them against
the realistic needs of the crops you grow. Realisti
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 2.4 ac 9 2003
2 24.3 ac 9 2003
3 8.7 ac 9 2003
5 5 ac 9 2003
8 14.6 ac 9 2003
Total:1 55 ac
Waste Utilization
Apply dairy waste according to soil test and waste analysis. Broadcast dairy waste on fields in
accordance to required nutrients shown on soil test for selected crops or in waste utilization plan.
Incorporate by disking into soil within two days. Split
Planned Applied
Field Amount Month Year Amount Date
1 2.4 ac 9 2003 2.4 ac 3/1/2004
2 24.3 ac 9 2003 24.2 ac 3/1/2004
3 8.7 ac 9 2003 8.7 ac 3/1/2004
5 5 ac 9 2003 5 ac 3/1/2004
8 14.6 ac 9 2003 14.6 ac 3/1/2004
Total: 55 ac 54.9 ac
4/20/2007 Page 3 of 4

CERTIFICATION OF PARTICIPANTS
` b7
LR^�YW *ARDATE
CERTIFICATION OF:
ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST CONSERVATION DISTRICT
q7
CARL HENRY OUTZ JR DATE CHATHAM SOIL&WATER CONS DATE
PUBLIC BURDEN STATEMENT
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collections is
0578-0013. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 45/0.75 minutes per response,including the
time for reviewing instructions,searching existing data sources,gathering and maintaining the data needed,and completing and reviewing
the collection information.
PRIVACY ACT
The above statements are made in accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974(5 U.S.0 522a). Furnishing this information is voluntary;
however failure to furnish correct,complete information will result in the withholding or withdrawal of such technical or financial assistance.
The information may be furnished to other USDA agencies,the Internal Revenue Service,the Department of Justice,or other state or
federal law enforcement agencies,or in response to orders of a court,magistrate,or administrative tribunal.
USDA NON-DISCRIMINATION STATEMENT
"The U.S.Department of Agriculture(USDA)prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race,color, national
origin,age,disability,and where applicable,sex,marital status,family status,parental status, religion,sexual orientation,genetic
information, political beliefs,reprisal,or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program.(Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.)Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program
information(Braille, large print,audiotape,etc.)should contact USDA's TARGET Center at(202)720-2600(voice and TDD). To file a
complaint of discrimination,write USDA, Director,Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue,S.W.,Washington,DC 20250-9410 or
call(800)795-3272(voice)or(202)720-6382(TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer."
4/20/2007 Page 4 of 4

1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DAIRY WASTE STORAGE POND WORKSHEET
(DAIRYWSP 1 . 1, 1/97 by P. Crawford)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTES: Jerry Crawford
Design Worksheet for: Jerry Crawford
In Chatham County, North Carolina
Date : Monday, 9/30/2.002
1. Waste Generated:
177 Cows x 1 . 95 cu. ft/cow/day x 90 Days
x 75 o confinement / 100
23298 cu. ft .
0 Heifers x 1 .40 cu. ft. /heifer/day x 90 Days
x 75 o confinement / 100
0 cu. ft .
2 . Wash Water:
(5 . 0 gals . /day/cow) / (7 .48 gals. /cu. ft . )
x 177 cows x 90 Days
10648 cu. ft .
3 . Lot Run-off (Nov. - Apr. ) :
7 . 9" / .12" x 17224 sq. ft .
11382 cu. ft .
4 . Undiverted Area Run-off (Nov. - Apr. ) :
7 . 9" / 12" x 13086 sq. ft .
8615 cu. ft .
5 . Excess Rainfall on Waste Storage Pond:
145 . 0 ft . length x 101 . 0 ft . width = 14645 sq. ft .
14645 sq. ft . x 9 . 2 in. /12 in.
11252 cu- ft .
6 . 25-year 24-hour Storm on Feedlot :
6 .4" / 12" x 17224 sq. ft .
9186 cu. ft .
7 . 25-year 24-hour Storm on Outside Undiverted Area:
6 .4" / 12" x 13086 sq. ft .
6979 cu. ft .
8 . 25-year 24-hour Storm on Waste Storage Pond:
6 .4" / 12" x 14645 sq. ft .
7811 cu. ft .
TOTAL STORAGE VOLUME = 87536 cu. ft .
654767 gal .
Storage Volume for the 25 year - 24 hour Storm = 23976 cu. ft .
Storage Volume at "Begin Pump" Elevation = 63560 cu

2
DESIGN FOR: Jerry Crawford
In Chatham County, North Carolina
Date: Monday, 9/30/2002
- ------------------------------------------------------
WASTE AND RAINFALL DESIGN DETAILS kprS 6zo-n Cjc�"-'L-4i
- ------------------------------------------------------
NOTES : Jerry Crawford OZAA 2 j r""mob
WASTE PRODUCTION:
177 Number of Cows
0 Number of Heifers
3 months of Waste Storage in WSP 'iA1�4
75 o Time Confined to Lot
1 . 95 cu. ft . /animal/day Cow Waste
1 .40 cu. ft . /animal/day Heifer Waste
5 . 0 gal/day/cow Wash Water
90 days of Waste Storage in WSP
23298 cu. ft . Volume of Cow Waste for Stor. Period
0 cu. ft . Volume of Heifer Waste for Stor. Period
10648 cu. ft . Wash Water to Store for Stor. Period
87536 cu. ft . Total Volume including Rain Water
654767 gal . Total Volume including Rain Water
RAINFALL AND RUNOFF:
DRAINAGE AREAS :
17224 sq. ft . Lot Drainage Area
13086 sq. ft . of Other Undiverted Drainage Area
14645 sq. ft . Surface Area Of WSP
STORAGE-PERIOD RAIN WATER:
7 . 9 in. Normal Lot Runoff (36"/year or 1811/6-mo. for imperv. lots)
7 . 9 In. Normal Runoff from Undiverted Area
9 . 2 in. Excess Rainfall on Pond (Rainfall Less Evaporation)
11382 cu. ft . Water from Normal Lot Runoff
6979 cu. ft . Water from Other Undiverted Drainage Area
11252 cu. ft . Excess Rain Water on Pond
25-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM WATER:
6 .4 in. Lot Runoff from 25-year 24-hour Storm
6 . 4 in. Undiverted Runoff from 25-year 24-hour Storm
6 .4 in. Rainfall on Pond from 25-year 24-hour Storm
9186 cu. ft . Lot Water from 25-year 24-hour Storm
6979 cu. ft . Undiverted Water from 25-year 24-hour Storm
7811 cu. ft . Water on Pond from 25-year 24-hour Storm
23976 cu. ft . All Water from 25-year 24-hour Storm

3
DESIGN FOR: Jerry Crawford
In Chatham County, North Carolina
Date : Monday, 9/30/2002
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTES : Jerry Crawford
WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN:
87536 cu. ft. Total Storage Vol to ESW Crest
8 . 9 ft . Pond Depth from Bottom to ESW Crest
1 . 0 ft . Depth from ESW Crest to Top of Dam
1 . 0 ft . Required Freeboard
2 . 0 ft . /ft . Inside Side Slope
145 ft . Top-of-Dam Length
101 ft . Top-of-Dam Width
106 ft . Length of Bottom
62 ft . Width of Bottom
13677. 0 sq. ft. Top Area for Prismoidal Formula
9772 . 7 sq. ft. Mid Area for Prismoidal Formula
6496 . 8 sq. ft . Bottom Area for Prismoidal Formula
0 . 31 ac . Pond Surface Acreage
EMERGENCY SPWY DESIGN:
0 . 0 cfs Peak Discharge through Emergency Spillway
4. 0 f/s Max. Velocity in Emergency Spillway
12 ft . ESW Bottom Width (Assume 3 : 1 Side Slopes)
0 . 0 ft . Design flow Depth in ESW (Based on A = Q/V)
"START PUMP" DEPTH:
7. 0 ft . Deep at "Begin Pump" Elev.
63560 cu. ft. Volume at "Begin Pump" Elev.
475426 Gal . Volume .at "Begin Pump" Elev.
134 ft . Long at "Begin Pump" Elev.
90 ft . Wide at "Begin Pump" Elev.
106 ft . Long at Bottom
62 ft . Wide at Bottom
11950 : 7 sq. ft . Top Area for Prismoidal Formula
9028 . 3 sq. ft . Mid Area for Prismoidal Formula
6496 . 8 sq. ft . Bottom Area for Prismoidal Formula
2 . 0 ft . /ft . Inside Side Slope
CLAY LINER DESIGN (if Required) : (See Tech. Note 716, Rev 1)
0 . 023 ft . /day . Specific Liner Discharge (v)
0 . 003 ft . /day Hydraulic Conductivity of Liner (k)
1 . 5 ft . Lining Thickness
Note : Volumes computed using the Prismoidal Formula:
Volume = depth/6 [ (area of top) + (4 x area of midsection) + (area of bottom) ]

4
^,ESIGN FOR: Jerry Crawford
In Chatham County, North Carolina
-late : Monday, 9/30/2002
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
WASTE STORAGE POND DIMENSIONS
(DAIRYWSP 1 . 1, 1/97 by P.Crawford)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
'jOTES : Jerry Crawford
Top El . 100 . 00
\ / \ ESW Crest El . 99 . 00
\ / \ St . Pump El . 97.. 13
\ pool / embankment \
\ / \ Bottom El . 90 . 14
\ / Liner Cut El . 88 . 64
CROSS SECTION OF STRUCTURE
1011'0 -
—CkE4i-E3t1 145
STORAGE U[L, = 87536 .
i
�y
3,0 ...... ..........................,,
919
106 '
ti
63
STRUCTURE DIMENSIONS
Note: Volumes computed using the Prismoidal Formula:
7olume = depth/6 [ (area of top) + (area of bottom) + (4 x area of midsection) ]

male oii iNorin %-aronna
Depart. nt of Environment and Natur:' 2esourees
Division of Water Quality
Animal Waste Management Systems
Request for Renewal of Existing Certificate of Coverage for State Non-Discharge Permit
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please review the information for
completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a question has not been completed by the Division,please
answer it to the best of your ability. Do not leave any question unanswered.
1 Facility Number.: 19 - 20 or Permit Number: AWC190020
2 Facility Name: Crawford Dairy
3 Landowner's name(must match the name on the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan): Jerry Ward Crawford
4 Landowner's Mailing address: 4085 Crawford Dairy Rd
City,State: Chapel Hill NC Zip: 27516
Telephone Number(include area code): 919-929-6869
5 County where facility is located: Chatham
6 Farm Manager's name(if different from Landowner):
7 Farm Manager's telephone number(include area code):
8 Number and Type of Animals:(example: 2000 Feeder to Finish Swine)
6att1e f 59-Bair le,o l�`� bZiu-.y
Submit a copy of the most recent Waste Utilization Plan with this application. The Waste Utilization Plan must be signed by
the owner and a technical specialist.
I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all
required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included,
this application package will be returned to me as incomplete. Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-
215.6B,any person who knowingly makes any false statement,representation,or certification in any application may be subject to civil
penalties up to$25,000 per violation.
Printed Name of Signing Official (Landowner, or if multiple Landowners all landowners should sign. If Landowner is a corporation
signature should be by a principal executive officer of the corporation):
Name:— zrr (d/a r. �+R:JT4� p _ Title:
Signature: �r---. _ 1 Date: (- 0 3
THE COMPLE 1 D APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON-DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
Request for Renewal COC

Certification Amendment for Cattle Facilities
Facility Number `c;�O Facility Name Cr`a -)+o r-cl
Number of Animals Facility is Certified for `7 7 Date of Certification �f� 0
Please indicate the maximum number of animals that your animal waste management system is designed to
accommodate:
Dairy Milking+dry cows
Heifers
Calves
Beef Brood Cows
Feeders
Stockers
TOTAL ANIMAL NUMBER J 7 7 **
** If this total is equal to the number that your facility is certified for,you do not need to complete the rest of this
form. If the above total number of animals is different than your certified number but it is what your technical
specialist evaluated when your facility was certified,please have your technical specialist amend the certification by
completing the section below. If your facility was not previously evaluated and certified for the maximum design
capacity,you must have a technical specialist re-certify your facility. Your certification number should be the
maximum number of animals(cows,heifers,calves,etc.)that your animal waste management system can
accommodate.
Please use the space below to describe the operation.
ga"', Aa4 hex-.., Aad Zea-117
(.c1 r�`� � J�C7 Glue} - /80 C!/�. ,o�a-g�• /Zsc.�J .cP t,�.�.�.e�.� L 7 7 Co wrG
/7? Cl o u-ij
a� y � w ,� Q p� /2 7 Cac,,j - 90 duo z-'-Ayz .
Amended Certification(only needed if the incorrect number of animals was previously certified):
By signing this you are certifying that the animal waste management system at this facility has been evaluated for
the maximum number of animals that it can appropriately accommodate;however, the original certification did not
correctly represent this number(shown above as Total Animal Number).
Farm owner/applicant ;
Signature Date / or
Farm manager(if applica e)
Signature Date
Technical Specialist 22 3
Signature .4 Date V d
Phone Number

Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
Existing or Netts or Expanded (please circle one) ^
General Information:
Name of Farm: Cr Facility No: _-- Q0
Owner(s) Name: W pv re C r'a.e,d=ye-8 _Phone No: Q{�-9a9 .4869
Mailing Address: Lkdl 5 Crata.74rt4 bo_-, i, -Uay!e,� ;Il K c �o sus -
Farm Location: Count• Farm is located in: CkA44,Po,
Latitude and Longitude: /
PIease attach a copy of a county road map with loc--tion identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.)
Oi eration Description:
iype of Strine tVo. of Animals Type of Poultn No. of Animals Tine of Cattle No. of Animals
:D Wean to Feeder =Lave: _ $5 Dairy
•D Feeder to Finish :D Pullets D Beef _
D Farrow to Wean
.D Farrow to Feeder
_t Farrow to Finish Other Tt e of Livestock: :'umber of Animals:
Expanding ,Operation Only
Previous Design Capacir : Additional Desi?n Capacity:
Total Design Capacit}•:
Acreage Available for Application: � Required Acreage: 0
Number of Lagoons/Storage Ponds : l Total Capaci Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: .YES dr NO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area of the LAGOON or SPRAY FIELD (please circle one)
Owner/illanager Agreement
I (we)verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I(we)understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I(we)understand that there must be no discharge of animal
waste from the storage or application syste n to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or
from a storm event less severe than the 25-year. 211-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal
waste. I ()ye) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized-using technical
standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The appr•�ved plan will be fled at the farm and at the
off-ice of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I ove) know that any modification must be approved.by a technical
specialist and submitted to the Soil and "ater Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership
requires written nocitication to DE.M or a new certification of the approved plan is c tangedl within 60 days of a tide transfer.
Name of Land Owner : erC W a CrGJw D;-d'
Si,_mature: Date:_ _-V-03
Name of\Y nag('rtif uiffz:':t from owner):
Signature: Date:
ANVC -- JanuarN 1. 1997 1

Technical Specialist Certification
LAs a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A
; CAC 6F .0005. 1 certifv that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has an animal waste
management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM)
as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (\RCS) and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The
following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each categon• designates a technical specialist who may
-sign each certification (SD. SI.WLP, RC,1), the technical specialist should only certify parts for which they are technically
competent.
II. Certificatioiz of Desigfz
A) Collection. Storage. Treatment System
Check the appropriate box
Yl Existing facility without retrofit (SD or VIWUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with waste utilization
requirements.
;J New. ex anded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste-storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems, lagoons and ponds,
have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specificauons.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): �� �� � —<<'•_ --
Affiliation: OM02az J10 f Cn.�serr)g-�ia�.! i �
Address(Age cy): Espy— 4 6�t Phone No.: 914-54IS-B3s_�
Signature: cI4 L Date:
B) and Application Site (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste utilization; chosen crop is
suitable for waste management;hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
r1
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Ft CL Et Wli CAL Sr" --
Affiliation:
Address(Agency):�•�� �oxs C. —13I D-- Phone No.: Q 19 -545- 18353
Signature: Date:.
C) Runoff Controls from Ex erior Lots
Check rite appropriate box
❑ FaciIity without exterior lots (SD or'VliP or RC)
This facility does not contain an%.exterior lots.
Sl Facility «•ith exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been designed in
accordance xith technical standards developed be tiRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): /11 Jh__ Jr. _-
AMIiation: dnAPIN -� W nn c�I --- -
Addresst.zRenc,..): C) ems. "-�bq NC a731, Phone No.:9(9- 5-eSS3
Sii-mature: Date:__3 t p
AWC -- .lar.uary 1. 1997 '—

D). Application and Han'. ,t; Equipment
Cheri the appropriate bar
ExictinE or expanding facility with existing_waste anDlication eauit,ment (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as necessary to accommodate the
,y�•aste mana-gement plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by the plan at rates not to
exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been
established; required buffers can be maintained and calibra6o❑ and adjustment guidance are contained as part of
the plan). `
C1 New. ex anded. or existing facility without existing_waste ape ]i:stion eauioment for spray
irrigation. (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to at, waste as necessar; to
accommodate the waste management plan. (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates: a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adiustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
:J Mew. exoanded. or existing facility without existing waste application eauinment for land
spreading not using spray irrigation. (WLiP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been-selected to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can cover the area required by the
plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates; a schedule for timing of
applications has been established; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adiustment guidance are
contained as part of the plan). `
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): 0,r 4E4El
Affiliation: a ;>� �c�� A,scL l�r�r Ca,.1Ser-
Address(Agenev): '7
_Phone No.: QI 9-54 S'_ : - 53
Signature: r Dater D _
E) Odor Control. Insect Control Mortality'Management and EmerQencv Action Plan (SD.
SI. NVUP. RC or I)
The.,waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Manatement Odor Control Checklist,an Insect Control
Checklist. a Mortality Management Checklist.and an Emergency Action Plan. 'Sources of both odors and insects
have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Management Practices to Minimize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
tilortality Management Plan and the Emergency Ac on implemented b
Plan are complete and can be y this facility.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): �t' Pfer 4 -3 r.
Affiliation: A - �,j r-
Address(Aae cy): 1ZPhone No.: 419- 545-835-
Signature: r Date: dl
F) 1ALritten Notice of Nie-w or Expanding- Swine Farm
The following,signature block is only to be used for new or expanding sine farms that begin construction after June
21, 1996. If the facility was built before June 21,1996,when was it constructed or last expanded
I (gee)certify that I(we) have attempted to contact by certified mail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who open property located across a public road.street. or highway from this ne%v or expanding swine farm. The notice was in
compliance with the requirements of\CGS 106-SOf. A .copy of the notice and a list of the wopem• owners notified is
attached.
'Name of Land Owner :
Signature: _ Date:
- arne from owner):
Signature _ --Date: _
AWC -- ,January I. 19.9

III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection, Storage Treatment Installation
New. expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds,have been installed in
accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation: /�'/44U J / L6&AAO_Q e&nAA&J
Address(Agencv): 1`:0• G 7 3 1 a Phone No.:4N-55 9-RQY41
Signature: Date:_
B) Land Application Site (VVLsP)
Check the appropriate box
Z The cropping system is in,place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by. (month/day/year);the proposed cover crop is appropriate
for compliance with the wasteutilization plan.
0 Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification,the owner has committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control;
1
Name of Technical Specialist (Please /Print).: r/ rV 'U,,h
Affiliation: agggm dNsenjAW;a✓ A-:sZ,:ek -
Address(Agency): eQ. go, 309 P' bor.. Ak/ Z7,3I Z Phone No.: 919-5y S-8 5_3
Signature: Date: �� �r �`c 4.. r
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III. B
above has been checked:
I(we)certify that I (we)have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my(our)waste utilization plan.and
if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control. and will submit to DELI a verification of completion from a
Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the-date specified in the conditional certification. I(we)realize that
failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me(us)to an enforcement
action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner : _
Signature: __ Date:_
Name of tilanaur(if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
WC -- januar-.• 1. ly'i- 1

C) Runoff Controls from ;erior Lots (RC)
Facility -with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been installed as specified
in the plan.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
I
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): 1 AC'f �fC,.f_
Affiliation: A4 1pev-, _ p t I A,CA
Address(Aeencv): IP,_Q. ilak � 45 be�[JC �?3lZphone i�lo.:_ t 4- 5�15- S3
Signature: _ Date: �t o3
D) application and Handling Equipment Installation ('ti'L1P or I)
Check the appropriare block
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready for use; calibration
and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are contained as par of the plan.
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a signed contract; equipment specified in the
contract agrees with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are contained as pan of the plan.
J Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan'has been
purchased and will be on site and installed by _ (month/day/year); there is adequate storage to
hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with the
cropping system contained in the plan: and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the
owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): OACI
Affiliation: ►J d LO w6ft-r
Address(Agencv):_ Ea+C. 2c74 PdL5 born hL a?312 Phone No.: ni 15-5(15.. Z
Signature: Date: 3 vZ I
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (-,ve) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we)realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plan and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner : _
Signature: Date:
Name of llanager(if different from owner):_ __-
Signature:__ _ Date:
E) Odor Control. Trisect Control and '.lortality Ianaaement (SD. SI IN11 P. RC or Il
Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Plan have been installed and are operational. The
mortality many=e nent system as speci;ied in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Nanie of Technical Specialist (Please Print): "'"I
Aiflllation: 4' P�-j + l —�04 � r; C l
.-;ddress(.a�_c is .' Sbo '`�-��' hcne No : PIq— SU�� 3
Si-*naure: -- _Date: a.t o3
.- WC -- ,Januan 1. 1997 _

Please return the completed form to the Division of Water Quality at the following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Water Quality
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a cop), of this form along, with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation District Office and to keep a cope in
your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
6
.o%'C -- Januar•• I. 1I!t)7

Operation and Maintenance Plan
For
Waste Storage Pond
The purpose of this plan is to' provide guidelines for
carrying out the routine maintenance work needed to keep the
waste storage pond operating as planned. Routine maintenance
is considered to be normal good care of the waste storage
pond and the surrounding area. Good maintenance adds to the
usefullness and permanence of the facility.
The routine maintenance of this waste storage pond involves
but is not limited to the -following:
1 . Maintenance of a vegetative cover on the embankment and
the surrounding areas : /�.5 Z
these areas . Beginning in � as being established fon
t
g g �&r and each year thereafter,
the embankment and surrounding areas should be fertilized
with 75© 1.�, pounds of l©-lo--/o or
from the waste storage inch of effluent
stand.
g pond per acre to maintain a vigorous
2 . Control of weeds , brush and trees in the grassed spillway
and on the embankment: This may be . done by mowing, spraying,
or chopping, or a combination of all three. This will be
done at least once each year and possibly twice in those
years favorable - to a heavy growth of vegetation. The local
Extension Agent or SCs office can supply the latest
-information on spray materials and the best time to apply
them.
3 . Protection of the. grass on the embankment and surrounding
areas : -Uncontrolled vehicular traffic can create trails or
ruts. Runoff from storms can enlarge these ruts into
gullies . If ruts appear to be forming, stop the traffic
doing the damage.
4. At the end of the designed storaged period 11-7
it w].I1 be necessary to completely empty this storage days,
facility. .This. will be . accomplished by agitating, hauling
and applying the effluent onto designated areas as noted on
the Waste Utilization Plan Map. Spring an'd early fall
applications will maximize. the ferti.11izer benefit of the
effluent . A marker will be used 'in the waste storage pond to
show when the maximum liquid level is reached.

S . Maintenance inspections of this facility should be made
during theInitial filling, at least annually, and after
every major storm event .
1 . Embankment
a. settlement, cracking or "jug" holes
b. side slope stability- slumps or bulges
c. erosion and/or wave action
d. rodent damage
e. seepage or other leakage
f . condition of vegetative . cover
2 . Reservoir Area
a. undesirable vegetative growth
b. undesirable floating debris
c . check liquid level to determine if
disposal of effluent is needed
3 . Fences and Gates
a. loose or damaged posts
b. loose or broken wires
c. open or damaged gates
6 . Additional specific items of importance for the
maintenance this structure are:

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
04-11-2007
This plan has been prepared for:
This plan has been developed by:
Howard&Jerry Crawford
Carl Henry Outz Jr.
Jerry Crawford Chatham Soil and Water Conservation Dist
4085 Crawford Dairy Rd
P. O. Box 309
Chapel Hill, NC 27516
Pittsboro, NC 27312
929-6869 919-545-8353
t
,r
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Both Manure and Fertilizer
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I(we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature(owne
of z c77
Date
Signature(manager or producer)
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S.Department of Agriculture-
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: U&S "t'
a� a7
Technical Specialist Signature
Date
289359 Database Version 3.1 - ---- --
Date Printed: 04-11-2007 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
S39 Dairy(Heifer)Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 979,695 gals/year by a 177
animal Dairy(Heifer)Liquid Manure Slurry operation.This production facility has
waste storage capacities of approximately 90 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast 9698
Incorporated 13225
Injected
14988
Irrigated 8817
Max.Avail. Actual PAN PAN Surplus/ Actual Volume Volume Surplus/
PAN(lbs) * Applied(lbs) Deficit(lbs) Applied(Gallons) Deficit(Gallons)
52608 -42910 5,314,490 -4,334,795
,
Year 1 9,698 -3,870,369
Year 2
9,698 48012 -38,314 4,850,064
----------------------------- ---- - -
Note: In source ID,S means standard source,U means user defined source.
*Max.Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s)identified in the plan for this source.
Preview
Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-20-2007 Source Page Page 1 of 1

Narrative
1. Average acreage planted to soybeans is five to ten acres. Average acreage planted to corn silage is
one hundred to one hundred and ten acres. Cropping rotation used by Crawford Dairy Farm is row crop
followed by cover crop followed by row crop. Corn is the major row crop planted with soybeans being
the secondary row crop. Small grain used in this cropping rotation may be harvested for grain,hayed, or
cut for silage. When small grain is harvested for grain the residue may be baled for hay or left as ground
cover for a conservation tillage row crop. When the small grain is left on the soil surface as residue for a
conservation tillage row crop,the nitrogen that was applied to that crop cannot be counted as utilized and
will need to be subtracted from the following crops nitrogen application amount.
2. Application rates have been reduced by 25%on grassland being grazed. When applying animal
waste, Senate Bill 1217 requires a 25%reduction in nitrogen applied on grazed fields.
3. Nitrogen applications should not exceed one hundred pounds of nitrogen per application. If more
nitrogen is required by the crop,the additional nitrogen will need to be applied at a later date.
4. Removal of waste must start when the start pump marker is first covered by waste.
5. The present cropping sequence used on Crawford Dairy Farm is row crop followed by small grain
followed by row crop. This cropping sequence may vary because of the farm's present needs,previous
year yields, conditions of crops presently planted, weather condition at present and during previous year,
and soil conditions. Row crop fields are constantly being rotated,the above factors determine what type
of crop will be planted in the upcoming year, and where it will be planted.
6. Buffer acreage has been fiquired for all tracts receiving waste, the following fields have had the
following acreage removed for buffers.
Tract 2530 field 11 .7 ac
Tract 2530 field 12 .5 ac
Tract 2359 field 1 .6 ac
Tract 2359 field 2 .5 ac
Tract 2358 field 2 .7 ac
Tract 2533 field 1 .2 ac
Tract 2533 field 2 .9 ac
7. Residual nitrogen is accounted for at an application rate of 50 pounds per acre.
8. Waste application method is broadcast with a honeywagon.
9. If a crop is planted that is not listed in the waste management plan, use the realistic yield tables
included on the preceding pages to pages to determine the nitrogen application rate.
10. Crops that are planted after soybeans shall have the residual nitrogen from the soybeans crop,
deducted from the present crops nitrogen application rate. The average residual nitrogen amount for
soybeans is thiry pounds of nitorgen per acre.
289359 Database Version 3.1
Date Printed: 04-11-2007 Narrative Page Page 1 of 1

i,ible shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are
provided for each crop,as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index(LI)and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment
}` field,where available.
"PLAT)Rating are also provided for each
anure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
1=.eld's PLAT Rating is High,any planned m
;ass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
with North
iI Tonal applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating,sstarter fertof P205eappliedtilizrs may be o each c op recommendedshown in the following table if
o, ina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity
':eld's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
!armed Crops Summary P205
rReplied
Total Useable Plat Crop Sequence RYE /acre)
Tract Field Acres Acres Rating LI Soil Series P A
*3.0 Tons 5 N/A
2346 1 10.8 10.88 Low 15.0 Wedowee Fescue Pasture 5 N/A
*'�Q Tons
Fescue Pasture �'- --
*3.0 Tons 5 N/A
2346 2 37.37 37.37 Low 15.0 Wedowee Fescue Pasture 5 N/A
Fescue Pasture *3.0 Tons
22.5 Tons 77 N/A
.2358 1 22.92 22.92 Medium 15.0 Geor eville Com,Silage 58 NIA
Small Grain,Sila a 10.8 Tons
*41 bu. 33 N/A
So beans,Double Crop
22.5 Tons 77 N/A
2358 2 7.93 7.93 Medium 15.0 Herndon Com,Sila e S8 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons
*41 bu. 33 N/A
Soybeans,Double Crop
*35 bu. 28 NIA
2359 1 8.76 8.7 Medium 10.0 Nanford So beans,Double Cro- 45 NIA
Small Grain,Silage *8.3 Tons
20.2 Tons 69 NIA
Com,Silage
*41 bu. 33 0
2359 2 4.7 4.72 High 15.0 Geor eville So beans,Double Crop
Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 40
Com,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 32
*3.9 Tons 6 N/A
2530 1 26.65 26.65 Medium 10.0 Helena Fescue Pasture 6 N/A
Fescue Pasture *3.9 Tons
*37 bu. 30 N/A
2530 10 4.5 4.50 Medium 10.0 Nanford So beans,Double Cro 48 NIA
Small Grain,Silage *8.8 Tons
21.6 Tons 73 N/A
Corn,Sila e
*4.9 Tons 8 N/A
2530 it 19.8 19.8 Low 15.0 Cecil Fescue Pasture
8 N/A
Fescue Pasture
*4.9 Tons
*41 bu. 33 NIA
2530 12 42.0 42.04 Low 15.0 Cecil Soybeans,Double Crop
58 NIA
Small Grain,Silage
10.8 Tons
Corn,Silage
22.5 Tons 77 N/A
253Q 13 9.2 9.26 Medium 15.0 Cecil Soybeans,Double Cro
*41 bu. 33 N/A
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 4/20/2007 PCS Page Page 1 of 3
NOTE: Symbol* means user entered data.

Planned Crops Summary
Total Useable Plat P2O5
Acres Removal Applied
Tract Field Acres Rating Ll Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (lbs/acre) (lbs/acre)
Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A
2530 2 3.45 3.45 Medium 10.0 Helena Fescue Pasture *3.9 Tons 6 N/A
Fescue Pasture *3.9 Tons 6 N/A
2530 3 3.53 3.53 Medium 10.0 Helena Soybeans,Double Crop *33 bu. 26 N/A
Small Grain,Silage *8.3 Tons 45 N/A
Corn,Silage 15.7 Tons 53 N/A
2530 6 29.93 29.93 Medium 15.0 Cecil Soybeans,Double Crop *41 bu. 33 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A
Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A
2530 7 7.08 7.08 Medium 15.0 Cecil Soybeans,Double Crop *41 bu. 33 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A
Corn.Sil;r'e 22.5 Tons 77 N/A
2530 8 11.20 11.20 Medium 15.0 Cecil Soybeans,Double Crop *41 bu. 33 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A
Com,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A
2530 9 1 4.50 4.50 Medium 15.0 Helena Fescue Pasture *3.9 Tons 6 N/A
Fescue Pasture *3.9 Tons 6 N/A
2533 1 19.64 19.64 Medium 15.0 1 Georgeville Com,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A
Soybeans,Double Crop *41 bu. 33 N/A
2533 2 24.5 24.50 Medium 15.0 Georgeville Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A
Soybeans,Double Crop *41 bu. 33 N/A
312 1 2.40 2.40 Medium 15.0 Georgeville Fescue Pasture *4.6 Tons 7 NIA
Fescue Pasture *4.6 Tons 7 N/A
312 2 24.30 24.30 Low 15.0 Georgeville Fescue Pasture *4.9 Tons 8 NIA
Fescue Pasture *4.9 Tons 8 NIA
312 3 8.70 8.70 Low 15.0 Georgeville Fescue Pasture *4.6 Tons 7 N/A
Fescue Pasture *4.6 Tons 7 N/A
312 4 1 15.00 15.001 Medium 15.0 Georgeville Com,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A
Soybeans,Double Crop *41 bu. 33 N/A
312 5 5.00 5.00 Low 15.0 Georgeville Fescue Pasture *4.6 Tons 7 N/A
Fescue Pasture *4.6 71,ons 7 N/A
312 6 14.9 14.90 Medium 15.0 Georgeville Corn,Silage 21.2 Tons 72 N/A
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 4/20/2007
PCS Page Page 2 of 3
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.

i armed Crops Summary
Total Useable Plat P205
Acres Removal Applied
Tract Field Acres Rating LI Soil Series Crop Sequence RYE (lbs/acre) (lbs/acre)
Small Grain,Silage 10.1 Tons 55 N/A
Soybeans,Double Crop *39 bu. 31 N/A
312 7 17.90 17.90 Medium 15.0 Georgeville Corn,Silage 22.5 Tons 77 N/A
Small Grain,Silage 10.8 Tons 58 N/A
Soybeans,Double Crop *41 bu. 33 N/A
312 8 1 14.60, 14.60 Low 1 15.0 1 Georgeville Fescue Pasture *4.6 Tonsl 7 N/A
Fescue Pasture *4.6 Tons 7 N/A
PLAN TOTALS: 401.52 401.52
LI Potential Leaching Technical Guidance
<2 Low potential to contribute to soluble None
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>=2& Moderate potential to contribute to soluble Nutrient Management(590)should be planned.
<=10 nutrient leaching below the root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble Nutrient Management(590)should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone. available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples
> 10 are Cover Crops(340)to scavenge nutrients,Sod-Based Rotations(328),Long-Tenn No-Till(778),
and edge-;of-field practices such as Filter Strips(393)and Riparian Forest Buffers(391).
PLAT Index Rating P Management Recommendation
0-25 Low No adjustment needed;N based application
25-50 Medium No adjustment needed;N based application
51 - 100 High Application limited to crop P removal
> 100 Very High Starter P application only
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 4/20/2007
PCS Page Page 3 of 3
NOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown,their nutrient requirements,and proper timing of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table Year 1
NgIrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
2346 1 S39 Wedowee 10.88 10.88 Fescue Pasture *3.0 Ton 8/1-7/31 100 0 0 Broad. 57 5.76 0.00 62.65 0.00
2346 1 S39 Wedowee 10.88 10.88 Fescue Pasture *3.0 Ton 8/1-7/31 100 5 0 Broad. 38 3.84 0.00 41.77 0.00
2346 2 S39 Wedowee 37.37 37.37 Fescue Pasture *3.0 Ton 8/1-7/31 100 0 0 Broad. 57 5.76 0.00 215.18 0.00
2346 2 S39 lWedowee 37.37 37.37 Fescue Pasture *3.0 Ton 8/1-7/31 100 5 0 Broad. 38 3.84 0.00 143.45 0.00
2358 1 S39 Georgeville 22.92 22.92 Com,Silage *22.5 To *2/15-6/30 241 41 *0 Broad. 200 20.20 0.00 463.07 0.00
2358 1 S39 Georgeville 22.92 22.92 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 117 17 0 Broad. 56 5.66 0.00 129.66 0.00
2358 2 S39 Herndon 7.93 7.93 Com,Silage *22.5 To *2/15-6/30 241 41 *0 Broad. 200 20.20 0.00 160.22 0.00
2358 2 S39 IHemdon 7.93 7.93 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 117 17 0 Broad. 56 5.66 0.00 44.86 0.00
2359 1 S39 Nanford 8.76 8.76 Soybeans,Double Crop *35 bu. 4/1-9/15 0 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
2359 1 S39 Nanford 8.76 8.76 Small Grain,Silage *8.3 Ton 9/1-3/31 90 10 20 Broad. 35 3.52 0.00 30.80 0.00
2359 2 S39 Georgeville 4.72 4.72 Soybeans,Double Crop *41 bu. 4/1-9/15 0 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2359 2 S39 lGeorgeville 4.72 4.72 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 117 69 20 Broad. 16 1.66 0.00 7.85 0.00
2530 1 S39 Helena 26.65 26.65 Fescue Pasture *3.9 Ton 8/1-7/31 127 0 0 Broad. 69 6.97 0.00 185.76 0.00
2530 1 S39 Helena 26.65 26.65 Fescue Pasture *3.9 Ton 8/1-7/31 127 12 0 Broad. 46 4.65 0.00 123.84 0.00
2530 10 S39 Nanford 4.50 4.50 Soybeans,Double Crop *37 bu. 4/1-9/15 0 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2530 10 1. S39 Nanford 4.50 4.50 Small Grain,Silage *8.8 Ton 9/1-3/31 95 5 20 Broad. 41 4.10 0.00 18.46 0.00
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:4/20/2007 WUT Page Page 1 of 6

wa,ae tAIM9.111011 taUle Year 1
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
2530 11 S39 Cecil 19.86 19.86 Fescue Pasture *4.9 Ton 8/1-7/31 163 0 0 Broad. 90 9.09 0.00 180.56 0.00
2530 11 S39 icecil 19.86 19.86 Fescue Pasture *4.9 Ton 8/1-7/31 163 13 0 Broad. 60 6.06 0.00 120.37 0.00
2530 12 S39 Cecil 42.04 42.04 Soybeans,Double Crop *41 bu. 4/1-9/15 0 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2530 12 S39 Cecil 42.04 42.04 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 1 120 10 20 Broad. 52 5.27 0.00 221.68 0.00
2530 13 S39 Cecil 9.26 9.26 Soybeans,Double Crop *41 bu. 4/1-9/15 0 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0.
2530 13 S39 Cecil 9.26 9.26 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 120 10 20 Broad. 52 5.27 0.00 48.83 0.00
2530 2 S39 Helena 3.45 3.45 Fescue Pasture *3.9 Ton 8/1-7/31 127 0 0 Broad. 69 6.97 0.00 24.05 0.00
2530 2 S39 Helena 3.45 3.45 Fescue Pasture *3.9 Ton 8/1-7/31 127 12 0 Broad. 46 4.65 0.00 16.03 0.00
2530 3 S39 Helena 3.53 3.53 Soybeans,Double Crop *33 bu. 4/1-9/15 0 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2530 3 S39 Helena 3.53 3.53 Small Grain,Silage *8.3 Ton 9/1-3/31 90 10 20 Broad. 35 3.52 0.00 12.41 0.00
2530 6 S39 Cecil 29.93 29.93 Soybeans,Double Crop *41 bu. 4/1-9/15 0 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2530 6 S39 Cecil 29.93 29.93 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 120 10 20 Broad. 52 5.27 0.00 157.831 0.00
2530 7 S39 Cecil 7.08 7.08 Soybeans,Double Crop *41 bu. 4/1-9/15 0 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2530 7 S39 Cecil 7.08 7.08 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 120 10 20 Broad. 52 5.27 • 0.00 37.33 0.00
2530 8 S39 Cecil 11.20 11.20 Soybeans,Double Crop *41 bu. 4/1-9/15 0 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
2530 8 S39 ICecil 11.20 1 L20 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 120 10 20 Broad. 521 5.27 0.00 59.06 0.00
2530 9 S39 Helena 4.50 4.50 Fescue Pasture *3.9 Ton 8/1-7/31 127 0 0 Broad. 69 6.97 0.00 31.37 0.00
2530 9 S39 Helena 4.50 4.50 Fescue Pasture *3.9 Ton 8/1-7/31 127 12 0 Broad. 46 4.65 0.00 20.91 0.00
2533 1 S39 Georgeville 19.64 19.64 Com,Silage *22.5 To *2/15-6/30 241 201 *0 Broad. 40 4.04 0.00 79.36 0.00
2533 1 S39 Georgeville 19.64 19.64 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 117 17 0 Broad. 56 5.66 0.00 111.10 0.00
2533 2 S39 Georgeville 24.50 24.50 Corn,Silage *22.5 To *2/15-6/30 241 21 20 Broad. 200 20.20 0.00 494.99 0.00
2533 2 S39 Georgeville 24.50 24.50 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 117 17 0 Broad. 56 5.661 0.00 138.60 0.00
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:4/20/2007 WUT Page Page 2 of 6

Waste Utilization Table Year 1
Nitror,cn Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field 1D Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
312 1 S39 Georgeville 2.40 2.40 Fescue Pasture *4.6 Ton 8/1-7/31 150 0 0 Broad. 75 7.58 0.00 18.18 0.00
312 1 S39 Georgeville 2.40 2.40 Fescue Pasture *4.6 Ton 8/1-7/31 150 25 0 Broad. 50 5.05 0.00 12.12 0.00
312 2 S39 Georgeville 24.30 24.30 Fescue Pasture *4.9 Ton 8/1-7/31 159 0 0 Broad. 75 7.58 0.00 184.11 0.00
312 2 S39 Georgeville 24.30 24.30 Fescue Pasture *4.9 Ton 8/1-7/31 159 34 0 Broad. 50 5.05 0.00 122.74 0.00
312 3 S39 Georgeville 8.70 8.70 Fescue Pasture *4.6 Ton 8/1-7/31 150 0 0 Broad. 75 7.58 0.00 65.91 0.01
312 3 S39 Georgeville 8.70 8.70 Fescue Pasture *4.6 Ton 8/1-7/31 150 25 0 Broad. 50 5.05 0.00 43.94 0.00
312 4 S39 Georgeville 15.00 15.00 Com,Silage *22.5 To *2/15-6/30 241 41 *0 Broad. 200 20.20 0.00 303.06 0.00
312 4 S39 Georgeville 15.00 15.00 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 117 17 0 Broad. 56 5.66 0.00 84.86. 0.00
312 5 S39 Georgeville 5.00 5.00 Fescue Pasture *4.6 Ton 8/1-7/31 150 0 0 Broad. 75 7.58 0.00 37.88 0.00
312 5 S39 Georgeville 5.00 5.00 Fescue Pasture *4.6 Ton 8/1-7/31 150 25 0 Broad. 50 5.05 0.00 25.25 0.00
312 6 S39 Georgeville 14.90 14.90 Com,Silage *21.2 To *2/15-6/30 227 27 *0 Broad. 200 20.20 0.00 301.04 0.00
312 6 S39 Georgeville 14.90 14.90 Small Grain,Silage *10.1 To 9/1-3/31 109 9 0 Broad. 56 5.66 0.00 84.29 0.00
312 7 S39 Georgeville 17.90 17.90 Com,Silage 22.5 Ton *2/15-6/30 241 41 *0 Broad. 200 20.20 0.00 361.65 0.00
312 7 S39 Georgeville 17.90 17.90 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 117 17 0 Broad. 57 5.76 0.00 103.07 0.00
M 8 S39 Georgeville 14.60 14.60 Fescue Pasture *4.6 Ton 8/1-7/31 150 0 0 Broad. 75 7.58 0.00 110.62 0.0
312 8 S39 Georgeville 14.60 14.60 Fescue Pasture *4.6 Ton 8/1-7/31 150 25 0 Broad. 50 5.05 0.00 73.74 0.00
Total Applied,1000 gallons 5,314.49
Total Produced,1000 gallons 979.70
Balance,1000 gallons -4,334.79
Total Applied,tons 0.00
Total Produced,tons 0.00
Balance,tons 0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column,-symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 2. Symbol*means user entered data.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:4/20/2007 WUT Page Page 3 of 6

VV a5LV ILAR126tIVIII n UVIU 7Y f-air.L
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (Ibs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic, 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
2346 1 S39 Wedowee 10.88 10.88 Fescue Pasture *3.0 Ton 8/1-7/31 100 5 0 Broad. 38 3.84 0.00 41.77 0.00
2346 1 S39 Wedowee 10.88 10.88 Fescue Pasture *3.0 Ton 8/1-7/31 100 0 0 Broad. 57 5.76 0.00 62.65 0.00
2346 2 S39 Wedowee 37.37 3 7.3 7 Fescue Pasture *3.0 Ton 8/1-7/31 100 5 0 Broad. 38 3.84 0.00 143.45 0.00
2346 2 S39 Wedowee 37.37 37.37 Fescue Pasture *3.0 Ton 8/1-7/31 100 0 0 Broad. 57 5.76 0.001 215.18 0.00
2358 1 S39 Georgevillc 22.92 22.92 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 44 4.44 0.00 101.88 0.0
2358 1 S39 Georgeville 22.92 22.92 Soybeans,Double Crop *41 bu. 4/1-9/15 0 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2358 2 S39 Henadon 7.93 7.93 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 44 4.44 0.00 35.25 0.00
2358 2 S39 Hemdon 7.93 7.93 Soybeans,Double Crop *41 bu. 4/1-9/15 0 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2359 1 S39 anford 8.76 8.76 Small Grain,Silage *8.3 Ton 9/1-3/31 90 0 0 Broad. 25 2.55 0.00 22.30 0.00
2359 1 S39 anford 8.76 8.76 Com,Silage *20.2 To *2/15-6/30 216 176 0 Broad. 40 4.04 0.00 35.40 0.00
2359 2 S39 IGeorgeville 4.72 4.72 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 12 1.20 0.00 5.68 0.00
2359 2 S39 lGeorgeville 4.72 4.72 Com,Silage *22.5 To *2/15-6/30 241 218 0 Broad. 23 2.29 0.00 10.83 0.00
2530 1 S39 Helena 26.65 26.65 Fescue Pasture *3.9 Ton 8/1-7/31 127 12 0 Broad,1 46 4.65 0.00 123.84 0.00
2530 10 S39 anford 4.50 4.50 Small Grain,Silage *8.8 Ton 9/1-3/31 95 0 0 Broad. 29 2.97 0.00 13.36 0.00
2530 10 S39 Nanford 4.50 4.50 Com,Silage *21.6 To *2/15-6/30 231 31 0 Broad. 200 20.20 0.00 90.92 0.0
2530 11 S39 Cecil 19.86 19.86 Fescue Pasture *4.9 Ton 8/1-7/31 163 13 0 Broad. 60 6.06 0.00 120.37 0.00
2530 11 S39 Cecil 19.86 19.86 Fescue Pasture *4.9 Ton 8/1-7/31 163 0 0 Broad. 90 9.09 0.00 180.56 0.00
2530 12 S39 Cecil 42.04 42.04 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 120 0 0 Broad. 38 3.82 0.00 160.53 0.00
2530 12 S39 Cecil 42.04 42.04 Corn,Silage *22.5 To *2/15-6/30 245 45 0 Broad. 200 20.20 0.00 849.36 0.00
2530 1 13 S39 Cecil 9.26 9.26 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 120 0 0 Broad. 38 3.82 0.00 35.36 0.00
2530 13 S39 Cecil 9.26 9.26 Com,Silage *22.5 To *2/15-6/30 245 45 0 Broad. 200 20.20 0.00 187.09 0.00
2530 2 S39 Helena 3.45 3.45 Fescue Pasture *3.9 Ton 8/1-7/31 127 12 0 Broad. 46 4.65 0.00 16.03 0.00
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:4/20/2007 WUT Page Page 4 of 6

Waste Utilization Table Year 2
cn Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
2530 2 S39 Helena 3.45 3.45 Fescue Pasture *3.9 Ton 8/1-7/31 127 0 0 Broad.. 69 6.97 0.00 24.05 0.00
2530 3 S39 Helena 3.53 3.53 Small Grain,Silage *8.3 Ton 9/1-3/31 90 0 0 Broad. 25 2.55 0.00 8.99 0.00
2530 3 S39 Helena 3.53 3.53 Corn,Silage *15.7 To *2/15-6/30 168 18 0 Broad. 150 15.15 0.00 53.49 0.00
2530 6 S39 Cecil 29.93 29.93 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 120 0 0 Broad. 38 3.82 0.00 114.29 0.00
2530 6 S39 Cecil 29.93 29.93 Corn,Silage *22.5 To *2/15-6/30 245 45 0 Broad. 200 20.20 0.00 604.70 O.C.
2530 7 S39 Cecil 7.08 7.08 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 120 0 0 Broad. 38 3.82 0.00 27.03 0.00
2530 7 S39 Cecil 7.08 7.08 Com,Silage *22.5 To *2115-6/30 245 45 0 Broad. 200 20.20 0.00 143.04 0.00
2530 8 S39 Cecil 11.20 11.20 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 120 0 0 Broad. 38 3.82 0.00 42.77 0.00
2530 8 S39 Cecil 11.20 11.20 Com,Silage *22.5 To *2/15-6/30 245 45 0 Broad. 200 20.20 0.00 226.28 0.00
2530 9 S39 Helena 4.50 4.50 Fescue Pasture *3.9 Ton 8/1-7/31 127 12 0 Broad. 46 4.65 0.00 20,91 0.00
2530 9 S39 Helena 4.50 4.50 Fescue Pasture *3.9 Ton 8/1-7/31 127 0 0 Broad. 69 6.97 0.001 31.37 0.00
2533 1 S39 Georgeville 19.64 19.64 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 44 4.44 0.00 87.30 0.00
2533 1 S39 Georgeville 19.64 19.64 Soybeans,Double Crop *41 bu. 4/1-9/15 0 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2533 2 S39 Georgeville 24.50 24.50 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 44 4.44 0.00 108.90 0.00
2533 2 S39 Georgeville 24.50 24.50 Soybeans,Double Crop *41 bu. 4/1-9/15 0 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.0
312 1 S39 eorgeville 2.40 2.40 Fescue Pasture *4.6 Ton 8/1-7/31 150 25 0 Broad. 50 5.05 0.00 12.12 0.00
312 1 S39 Georgeville 2.40 2.40 Fescue Pasture *4.6 Ton 8/1-7/31 150 0 0 Broad. 75 7.58 0.00 18.18 0.00
312 2 S39 Georgeville 24.30 24.30 Fescue Pasture *4.9 Ton 8/1-7/31 159 34 0 Broad. 50 5:05 0.00 122.74 0.00
312 2 S39 Georgeville 24.30 24.30 Fescue Pasture *4.9 Ton 8/1-7/31 159 0 0 Broad. 75 7.58 0.00 184.11 0.00
312 3 S39 Georgeville 8.70 8.70 Fescue Pasture *4.6 Ton 8/1-7/31 150 25 0 Broad. 50 5.05 0.00 43.94 0.00
312 3 S39 Georgeville 8.70 8.70 Fescue Pasture *4.6 Ton 8/1-7/31 150 0 0 Broad. 75 7.58 0.00 65.91 0.00
312 4 S39 Georgeville 15.00 15.00 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 44 4.44 0.00 66.67 0.00
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:4/20/2007 WUT Page Page 5 of 6

vvaste utuizatioin iaDX! t'eair 2
Nitrogen Comm. Res. Manure Liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Fert. (lbs/A) PA ManureA Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Nutrient NutrientA pplied Applied Applied Applied
Req'd Applied pplied (acre) (acre) (Field) (Field)
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A)
Source Total Use. Applic. Applic. 1000
Tract Field ID Soil Series Acres Acres Crop RYE Period N N N Method N gal/A Tons 1000 gals tons
312 4 S39 Georgeville 15.00 15.00 Soybeans,Double Crop *41 bu. 4/1-9/15 0 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
312 5 S39 Georgeville 5.00 5.00 Fescue Pasture *4.6 Ton 8/1-7/31 150 25 0 Broad. 50 5.05 0.00 25.25 0.00
312 5 S39 Georgeville 5.00 5.00 Fescue Pasture *4.6 Ton 8/1-7/31 150 0 0 Broad. 75 7.58 0.00 37.88 0.00
312 6 S39 Georgeville 14.90 14.90 Small Grain,Silage *10.1 To 9/1-3/31 109 0 0 Broad. 44 4.44 0.00 66.23 0.00
312 6 S39 Georgeville 14.90 14.90 Soybeans,Double Crop *39 bu. 4/1-9115 0 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0,
312 7 S39 Georgeville 17.90 17.90 Small Grain,Silage *10.8 To 9/1-3/31 117 0 0 Broad. 43 4.34 0.00 77.75 0.00
312 7 S39 IGeorgeville 17.90 17.90 Soybeans,Double Crop *41 bu. 4/1-9/15 0 0 0 Broad. 0 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00
312 8 S39 IGeorgeville 14.60 14.60 Fescue Pasture *4.6 Ton 8/1-7/31 150 25 0 Broad. 50 5.05 0.00 73.74 0.00
312 8 S39 IGeorgeville 14.60 14.60 Fescue Pasture *4.6 Ton 8/1-7/31 150 0 0 Broad. 75 7.58 0.00 110.62 0.00
Total Applied,1000 gallons 4,850.06
Total Produced,1000 gallons 979.70
Balance,1000 gallons -3,870.37
Total Applied,tons 0.00
Total Produced,tons 0.00
Balance,tons 0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column,-symbol means leased,otherwise,owned. 2. Symbol*means user entered data.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:4/20/2007 WUT Page Page 6 of 6

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient management plan
developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the plan.
Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown,their nutrient requirements and soil test results. The
quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However,the quantity of other
nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized
to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so
as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations,
additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 0 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 2346 1 Req'd Nutrients *100 0 30 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 10.88 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP.Fescue Pasture IStarter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Wedowee Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *3.0 Tons 01-12-07 Manure 95 941 142 461 2 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 5 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 94 112 46 2 2 0 0
Tract Field 2346 2 Req'd Nutrients *100 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 37.37 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Wedowee Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *3.0 Tons 1 01-12-07 Manure 95 941 142 46 2 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 5 Ibs/ac. tow BALANCE 0 94 142 46 2 2 0 0
Tract Field 2530 1 Req'd Nutrients *127 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 26.65 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Helena Residual 01 0 01 0 0 01 0 0
RYE I Sample Date *3.9 Tons 01-12-07 Manure 115 113 172 55 2 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 6 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 113 172 55 2 2 1 0
Tract Field 2530 11 RegANutrients *163 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 19.86 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYEJ Sample Date *4.9Ton$ 1 01-25-06 Manure 150 148 224 721 3 31 11 0
P Removal Rating 8 lbs/ac. 11 ow I BALANCE 0 148 2241 721 31 3 1 1 0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/20/2007 NMR Page Page 1 of 16

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 0 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
!',act Field 2530 2 Req'dNutrients *127 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'res App.Period 3.45 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *3.9Tons 01-12-07 Manure 115 113 172 55 2 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 6 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 113 172 55 2 2 1 0
Tract Field 2530 9 Req'dNutrients *127 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres f App.Period 4.50 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series i Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date *3.9 Tons 01-25-07 Manure 115 113 172 55 2 2 1 0
F Removal Rating 6 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 113 172 55 2 2 1 0
Tract Field 312 1 Req'd Nutrients *150 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
:.r.res App.Period 2.40 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
n''E Sample Date *4.6Tons 01-25-07 Manure 125 123 186 60 2 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 7 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 123 186 60 2 3 1 0
Tract Field 312 2 Req'dNutrients *159 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cares App.Period 24.30 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *4.9 Tons 01-25-07 Manure 125 123 186 60 2 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 8 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 123 186 60 2 3 1 0
Tract I Field 312 3 Req'd Nutrients *150 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 8.70 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
kYE Sample Date *4.6Tons 12-04-06 Manure 125 123 186 60 2 3 1. 0
P Removal Rating 7 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 123 186 60 2 3 1 0
'rrview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/20/2007 NMR Page Page 2 of 16

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR Q N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract IField 312 5 Req'd Nutrients *150 20 0 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 5.00 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *4.6 Tons 12-04-07 Manure 125 123 186 60 21 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 7 Ibs/ac. I ow BALANCE 01 103 1861 60 2 31 1 0
Tract Field 312 8 Req'd Nutrients *150 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Acres App.Period 14.60 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *4.6 Toil
ons 12-04-06 Manure 125 123 186 60 2 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 7 lbs/ac. ILow BALANCE 0 123 186 60 2 31 11 0
NOTE: Symbol* means user entered data.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/20/2007 NMR Page Page 3 of 16

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
1'ract Field 2346 1 Req'd Nutrients *100 0 30 0 0 0 0 0
A,res App.Period 10.88 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Wedowee Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *3.0 Tons 01-12-07 Manure 95 94 142 46 21 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 5 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 94 112 46 2 2 0 0
'tract Field 2346 2 Req'd Nutrients *100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 37.37 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Wedowee Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R YE Sample Date *3.0 Tons 01-12-07 Manure 95 94 142 46 2 2 0 0
P Removal iRating 5lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 94 142 46 2 2 0 0
1'ract Field 2358 1 Req'd Nutrients *117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
,acres App.Period 22.92 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
kYE Sample Date *10.8Tons 01-12-07 Manure 100 99 149 48 2 2 0 0
1'Removal Rating 58 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 99 149 48 2 2 0 0
Tract Field 2358 1 Req'd Nutrients *241 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 22.92 *2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R"E Sample Date *22.5 Tons 01-12-07 Manure 200 1971 298 96 4 4 1 0
P Removal Rating 77 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 197 298 96 4 4 1 0
Tract Field 2358 2 Req'd Nutrients *117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 7.93 911-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Hemdon Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *10.8Tons 01-12-07 Manurel 100 99 149 48 2 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 58 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 1 01 99 149 48 2 21 01 0
'''.view Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/20/2007 NMR Page Page 4 of 16

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 2358 2 Req'd Nutrients *241 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 7.93 *2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Hemdon Residual *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *22.5 Tons 01-12-07 Manure 200 197 298 96 4 4 1 0
P Removal Rating 77 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 197 298 96 4 4 1 0
Tract Field 2359 1 Req'd Nutrients *0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 8.76 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Nanford Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *35 bu. 01-25-07 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 28 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2359 1 Req'd Nutrients *90 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Acres App.Period 8.76 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series `:anford Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *8.3 Tons 01-25-07 Manure 60 59 90 29 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 45 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 59 90 29 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 2359 2 Req'dNutrients *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 4.72 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *41 bu. 01-25-07 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 33 lbs/ac. High BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2359 2 Req'd Nutrients *117 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 4.72 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYEI Sample Date *10.8 Tons 01-25-07 Manure 28 40 42 14 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 581bs/ac. l i igh BALANCE 0 40 42 14 1 1 0 0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/20/2007 NMR Page Page 5 of 16

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (ibs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
1'ract I Field 2530 1 Req'dNutrients *127 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 26.65 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *3.9 Tons 01-12-07 Manure 115 113 172 55 2 2 1 0
1' Removal I Rating 6lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 113 172 55 2 2 1 0
Tract Field 2530 10 Req'd Nutrients *95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7Ae:res App.Period 4.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Nanford Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *8.8 Tons 01-25-07 Manure 70 69 104 34 1 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 48 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 69 104 34 1 1 0 0
Tract Field 2530 10 Req'd Nutrients *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A,-,es App.Period 4.50 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Hanford Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AYE Sample Date *37bu. 01-25-07 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 30 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract I Field 2530 11 Req'd Nutrients *163 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A;,res App.Period 19.86 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *4.9 Tons 1 01-25-06 Manure 150 148 224 72 3 3 1 0
1'Removal Rating 8 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 148 224 72 3 3 1 0
ITact Field 2530 12 Req'dNutrients *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
`.ores App.Period 42.04 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
it YE I Sample Date *41 bu. 01-25-07 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 33 lbs/ae. Low BALANCE 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0
review Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/20/2007 NMR Page Page 6 of 16

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 2530 12 Req'd Nutrients *.120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 42.04 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 20 0 01 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *10.8 Tons 01-25-07 Manure 90 89 134 43 2 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 58 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 01 89 134 43 2 21 0 0
Tract Field 2530 13 Req'd Nutrients *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 9.26 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,.Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *41 bu. 01-25-07 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 33 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2530 13 Req'dNutrients *120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 9.26 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 20 0 0 0 0 01 0 0
RYE Sample Date *10.8Tons 01-25-07 Manure 90 89 134 43 2 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 58 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 01 89 134 43 2 2 0 0
Tract Field 2530 2 Req'd Nutrients *127 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 3.45 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date *3.9 Tons 01-12-07 Manure 115 113 172 551 2 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 6 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 01 113 172 55 2 21 1 0
Tract Field 2530 3 Req'd Nutrients *90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 3.53 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LSamp
s Helena Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R *8.3 Tons 01-25-07 Manure 60 59 90 29 1 1 0 0P 45 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 591 901 29 1 11 01 0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/20/2007 NMR Page Page 7 of 16

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
1'ract Field 2530 3 Req'd Nutrients *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 3.53 4/1-9115 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *33 bu. 01-25-07 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 26 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2530 6 Req'd Nutrients *120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 29.93 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
?tYE Sample Date *10.8 Tons 01-25-07 Manure 90 89 134 43 21 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 58 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 89 134 43 2 2 0 0
Tract Field 2530 6 Req'd Nutrients *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1;:res I App.Period 29.93 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *41 bu. 01-25-07 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 33 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2530 7 Req'd Nutrients *120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'ores App.Period 7.08 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert, 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
►t YE I Sample Date *10.8 Tons 01-25-07 Manure 90 89 134 43 2 2 0 0
P Removal I Rating 58 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 89 1341 43 2 2 0 0
Tract I Field 2530 7 Req'd Nutrients *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 7.08 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *41 bu. 01-25-07 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 1 33 Ibs/ac. IMedium I BALANCE 1 0 0 01 01 0 0 0
'review Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/20/2007 NMR Page Page 8 of 16

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 2530 8 Req'd Nutrients *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 11.20 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYEJ Sample Date *41 bu. 01-25-07 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 33 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2530 8 Req'dNutrients *120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 11.20 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *10.8 Tons 01-25-07 Manure 90 89 134 43 2 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 58 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 89 134 43 2 2 0 0
Tract Field 2530 9 Req'dNutrients *127 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 4.50 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0
RYE Sample Date *3.9 Tons 01-25-07 Manure 115 113 172 55 2 2 1 0
P Removal Rating 6 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 113 .1721 55 2 2 1 0
Tract Field 2533 1 Req'd Nutrients *241 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 19.64 *2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 201 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *22.5 Tons 01-12-07 Manure 40 39 60 19 1 1 01 0
P Removal Rating 77 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 39 60 19 1 1 0 0
FTract Field 2533 1 Req'd Nutrients *117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 19.64 9/1-3/31 Supplied By.
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date *10.8 Tons 01-12-07 Manure 100 99 149 48 2 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 58 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 99 1 491 48 2 2 0 0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/20/2007 NMR Page Page 9 of 16

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
rract Field 2533 2 Req'd Nutrients *117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 24.50 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R YE Sample Date *10.8 Tons 01-12-07 Manure 100 99 149 48 2 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 58 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 99 149 48 2 2 0 0
Tract Field 2533 2 Req'd Nutrients *241 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
%ores App.Period 24.50 1 *2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn, Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
It YE Sample Date *22.5 Tons 01-12-07 Manure 200 197 298 96 4 4 1 0
t'Removal Rating 77 Ibs/ac, Medium BALANCE 0 197 2981 96 4 4 1 0
Tract Field 312 1 Req'd Nutrients *150 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
As res App.Period 2.40 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert, 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *4.6 Tons 01-25-07 Manure 125 123 186 60 2 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 7 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 123 186 60 2 3 1 0
tract Field 312 2 Req'd Nutrients *159 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 24.30 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *4.9 Tons 01-25-07 Manure 125 123 186 60 2 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 8 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 123 186 60 2 3 1 0
"Tact Field 312 3 Req'd Nutrients *150 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 8.70 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *4.6 Tons 12-04-06 Manure 125 123 186 60 2
3 1 0
P Removal I Rating 7 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 123 186 60 2 3 1 0
?review Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/20/2007 NMR Page Page 10 of 16

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P205 K20 Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 312 4 Req'd Nutrients *241 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres I App.Period 15.00 *2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *22.5 Tons 12-04-07 Manure 200 197 298 96 4 4 1 0
PRemoval Rating 77lbs/ac. %ledium BALANCE 0 197 2981 96 4 4 1 0
Tract Field 312 4 Req'd Nutrients *117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 15.00 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *10.8 Tons 12-04-07 Manure 100 99 149 48 2 2 0 0
PRemoval Rating 58lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 99 149 48J 2 2 0 0
Tract Field 312 5 Req'd Nutrients *150 20 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 5.00 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *4.6 Tons 12-04-07 Manure 125 123 186 60 2 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 7 Ibs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 -103 186 60 2 3 1 0
Tract Field 312 6 Req'd Nutrients *109 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 14.90 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *10.1 Tons 12-04-06 Manure 100 99 149 48 2 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 55 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 99 149 48 2 21 0 0
Tract Field 312 6 Req'd Nutrients *227 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 14.90 *2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 1 *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *21.2 Tons 12-04-06 Manure 200 197 298 96 4 4 1 0
P Removal Rating 72 Ibs/ac. iMedium BALANCE 1 01 197 2981 961 4 4 1 0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/20/2007 NMR Page Page 11 of 16

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 1 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 312 7 Req'dNutrients *117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AC-,PS App.Period 17.90 9/1-3/31 Supplied By:
CROP Small Grain,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *10.8 Tons 12-04-06 Manure 100 99 149 48 2 1 2 0 0
P Removal Rating 58 lbs/ac. NIedium BALANCE 0 99 149 48 2 2 0 0
Tract Field 312 7 Req'd Nutrients 241 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 17.90 *2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual *0 0 01 0 0 00 0
EYE Sample Date 22.5Tons 12-04-06 Manure 200 197 298 96 4 4 1 0
Removal Rating 77lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 197 298 96 4 4 1 0
Tract Field 312 8 Req'd Nutrients *150 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 14.60 8/1-7/31 Supplied By:
CROP Fescue Pasture Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *4.6 Tons 12-04-06 Manure 125 123 186 60 2 3 1 0
P Removal Rating 71bs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 123 186 60 2 3 I 0
.TOTE: Symbol*means user entered data.
'--view Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/20/2007 NMR Page Page 12 of 16

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 2358 I Req'd Nutrients *0 p
0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 22.92 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 p
0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville 0
Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RYE Sample Date *41 bu. 01-12-07 Manure 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 33 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0
0 0 p 0 0 0 0
Tract . Field 2358 2 Req'd Nutrients *0 p
0 p p 0 0 p
Acres App.Period 7.93 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Herndon 0
Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *41 bu. 01-12-07 Manure 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 33 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2359 1 Req'd Nutrients *216 p
0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 8.76 *2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage I Starter p
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 176 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Nanford 0
Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p
RYE Sample Date *20.2 Tons 01-25-07 Manure 40 39
60 19 I 1 0 0
P Removal Rating 69 Ibs/ac. 4ledium BALANCE
-01 39 60 19 1 1 p p
Tract Field 2359 2 Req'd Nutrients *241 p
0 01 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 4,72 *2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Commercial Fert. 218 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville 0
Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *22.5 Tons 01-25-07 Manure 23 32
34 0 0 P Removal Rating 77 lbs/ac. High BALANCE 11 0 p
0 32 34 11 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2530 10 Req'd Nutrients *231 p
0 0 0 0 0 0 Acres App.Period 4.50 *2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Nanford Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sam le Date *p 0 0 21.6 Tons 01-25-07 Manure 200 197 298 96
P Removal Rating4 4 1 0
?31bs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 197 298 96
4 4 1 0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/20/2007
NMR Page Page 13 of 16

'Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
YEAR 2 (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
M
Field 2530 12 Req'd Nutrients *245 0 0 0 0 0 00
App.Period 42.04 *2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0X�972
0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 45 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0
tYl. Sample Date *22.5Tons 01-25-07 Manure 200 96 4 4 1 0
'Removal Rating 77 lbs/ac. Low BALANCE 0 96 44 1 0'i i act Field 2530 13 Req'd Nutrients *245 0 0 0 0 0
-kcres App.Period 9.26 *2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter F
0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series CecilResidual 0 0 u 0 0KYE Sample Date *22.5 Tons 01-25-07 Manure 298 96 4 4 1 0
P Removal Rating 77 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 298 91 4 4 1 0
Tract Field 12530 3 Req'd Nutrients *168 0 01 0 0 0 0 0
acres App.Period 3.53 *2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0
CROP 0
Commercial Fert. 18 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series
Helena Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *15.7 Tons 01-25-07 Manure 150 148 224 72 3 3 1 0
i Removal Rating 53 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 148 224 72 3 3 1 0
Tract Field 2530 5 Req'dNutrients *245 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
;res App.Period 29.93 *2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil
Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *22.5 TonsFMdiurn
O1-25-07 Manure 200 197 298 96 4 4 1 0
P Removal Rating 77 lbs/ac. BALANCE 0 197 298 96 4 4 1 0
Tract FieldTgSupple,Rq'd Nutrients *245 00 0 0 0 00
Acres App.PeriodidBy:CROP Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil
Residual 0 0 0 01
0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *22.5 Tons 01-25-07 Manure 200 1971298 96 4 4 1 0
P Removal Rating 77 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 197 298 96 4 4 1 0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/20/2007 NMR Page Page 14 of 16

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
mg
2530 8Req'd Nutrients *245 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0
d 11.20 *2/15-6/30 Supplied By:
CROP Corn,Silage Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Cecil Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *22.5Tons 01-25-07 Manure 200 197 298 96 41 4 1 0
P Removal Rating 77 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 197 2981 96 4 4 1 0
Tract Field 2533. 1 Req'd Nutrients *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 19.64 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE I Sample Date *41 bu. 01-12-07 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 33 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 2533 2 Req'd Nutrients *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 1 24.50 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *41 bu. 01-12-07 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 33 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 312 4 Req'd Nutrients *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 15.00 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *41 bu. 12-04-07 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 33 Ibs/ac. Medium BALANCE 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tract Field 312 6 Req'd Nutrients *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 14.90 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *39 bu. 12-04-06 Manure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal Rating 31 lbs/ac. Medium BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/20/2007 NMR Page Page 15 of 16

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR 2 N P2O5 K2O Mg Mn Zn Cu Lime
(lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (Ibs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (lbs/A) (tons/A)
Tract Field 312 7 Req'd Nutrients *0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Acres App.Period 17.90 4/1-9/15 Supplied By:
CROP Soybeans,Double Crop Starter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Commercial Fert. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soil Series Georgeville Residual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RYE Sample Date *41 bu. 12-04-06 Manure 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P Removal IRating 33 Ibs/ac. INIedium BALANCE 0 01 01 01 0 01 01 0
UGITE: Symbol* means user entered data.
'review Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 4/20/2007 NMR Page Page 16 of 16

The Required Soil Test Values shown in the following table provide a summary of recommended actions that should be taken if soil tests indicate excessive levels of copper
or zinc. Fields that receive manure must have an annual soil analysis for these elements. High levels of zinc and copper can adversely affect plant growth. Alternative crop
sites must be used when the concentration of these metals approach excessive levels. Site life can be estimated by dividing the amount of copper and zinc to be applied in
lbs/acre by 0.036 and 0.071,respectively and multiplying the result by 0.85. By adding this quantity to the current soil index for copper or zinc,we can predict life of the site
for waste disposal.
In addition to copper and zinc indices,this table also provides a summary of lime recommendations for each crop based on the most recent soil sample. Application of lime
at recommended rates is necessary to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production.
Re uired Soil Test Values
Lime Recom.
Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-I Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation
2346 1 Fescue Pasture 5.2 1.0 29 None 98 None
2346 1 Fescue Pasture 5.2 0.0 29 None 98 None
2346 2 Fescue Pasture 5.5 1.3 113 None 567 None
2346 2 Fescue Pasture 5.5 0.0 113 None 567 None
2358 1 Corn,Silage 5.9 0.0 82 None 171 None
2358 1 Small Crain,Silage 5.9 0.0 82 None 171 None
2358 1 Soybeans,Double Crop 5.9 0.0 82 None 171 None
2358 2 Corn,Silage 5.9 0.0 82 None 171 None
2358 2 Small Grain,Silage 5.9 0.0 82 None 171 None
2358 2 Soybeans,Double Crop 5.9 0.0 82 1 None 171 None
2359 1 Soybeans,Double Crop 6.2 0.0 95 None 316 None
2359 1 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 95 None 316 None
2359 1 Cotn,Silage 6.2 0.0 95 None 316 None
2359 2 Soybeans,Double Crop 6.2 0.0 95 None 316 None
2359 2 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 95 None 316 None
2359 2 Corn,Silage 6.2 0.0 95 None 316 None
2530 1 Fescue Pasture .0 0.0 91 None 552 None
2530 1 Fescue Pasture 0 0.0 91 None 552 None
2530 10 Soybeans,Double Crop 6.2 0.0 51 None 200 None
2530 10 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 51 None 200 None
2530 10 Corn,Silage 6.2 0.0 51 None 200 None
2530 11 1 Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 182 None 689 None
2530 11 1 Fescue Pasture 6.7 0.0 182 None 689 None
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
289359 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-11-2007 STV Page Page 1 of 3

Reruired Soil Test Values
Lime Recom.
Tract Field Crop pH (tonslacre) Cu-I Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation
2530 12 Soybeans,Double Crop 6.6 0.0 122 None 391 None
2530 12 Small Grain,Silage 6.6 0.0 122 None 391 None
2530 12 Corn,Silage 6.6 0.0 122 None 391 None
2530 13 Soybeans,Double Crop 6.2 0.0 51 None 200 None
2530 13 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 51 None 200 None
2530 13 Corn,Silage 6.2 0.0 51 None 200 None
2530 J 2 Fescue Pasture .0 0.0 91 None 552 None
2530 2 Fescue Pasture .0 0.0 91 None 552 None
2530 3 Soybeans,Double Crop 6.5 0.0 122 None 391 None
2530 3 Small Grain,Silage 6.5 0.0 122 None 391 None
2530 3 Com,Silage 6.5 0.0 122 None 391 None
2530 6 Soybeans,Double Crop 6.7 0.0 119 None 26g None
2530 6 Small Grain,Silage 6.7 0.0 119 None 268 None
2530 6 Corn,Silage 6.7 0.0 119 None 268 None
2530 7 Soybeans,Double Crop 6.7 0.0 148 None 447 None
2530 7 Small Grain,Silage 6.7 0.0 148 None 447 None
2530 7 Corn,Silage 6.7 0.0 148 None 447 None
2530 8 Soybeans,Double Crop 6.2 0.0 95 None 316 None
2530 8 Small Grain,Silage 6.2 0.0 95 None 316 1 None
2530 8 Corn,Silage 6.2 0.0 95 None 316 None
2530 1 9 Fescue Pasture 6.5 0.0 155 None 371 None
2530 9 Fescue Pasture 6.5 0.0 155 None 371 None
2533 1 Corn,Silage 7.1 0.0 194 None 341 None
2533 1 Small Grain,Silage 7.1 0.0 194 None 341 None
2533 1 Soybeans,Double Crop 7.1 0.0 194 None 341 None
2533 2 Corn,Silage 7.1 0.0 194 None 341 None
2533 2 Small Grain,Silage 7.1 0.0 194 None 341 None
2533 2 Soybeans,Double Crop 7.1 0.0 194 None 341 None
312 1 Fescue Pasture 6.5 0.0 155 None 371 None
312 1 Fescue Pasture j 6.5 0.0 1 155 None 371 None
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
289359 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-11-2007 STV Page Page 2 of 3

Required Soil Test Values
Lime Recom.
Tract Field Crop pH (tons/acre) Cu-I Copper Recommendation Zn-I Zinc Recommendation
312 2 Fescue Pasture 6.5 0.0 155 None 371 None
312 2 Fescue Pasture 6.5 0.0 155 None 371 None
312 3 Fescue Pasture 6.4 0.0 183 None 621 None
312 3 Fescue Pasture 6.4 0.0 183 None 621 None
312 4 Corn,Silage 6.1 0.0 83 None 261 None
312 4 Small Grain,Silage 6.1 0.0 83 None 261 None
312 4 Soybeans,Double Crop 6.1 0.0 83 None 261 None
312 5 Fescue Pasture 5.6 0.8 89 None 301 None
312 5 Fescue Pasture 5.6 0.0 89 None 301 None
312 6 Corn,Silage 6.1 0.0 83 None 261 None
312 6 Small Grain,Silage 6.1 0.0 83 None 261 None
312 6 Soybeans,Double Crop 6.1 0.0 83 None 261 None
312 7 Corn,Silage 6.1 0.0 83 None 261 None
312 7 Small Grain,Silage 6.1 0.0 83 None 261 None
L312 7 Soybeans,Double Crop 6.1 0.0 83 None 261 None
312 8 Fescue Pasture 5.6 0.7 168 None 305 None
312 8 Fescue Pasture 5.6 0.0 168 None 305 None
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
289359 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-11-2007 STV Page Page 3 of 3

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity,this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name I Dairy(Heifer)Liquid Manure Slugy Design Storage Capacity(Days)
Start Date 2/15 90
Plan Year Month Available Storage Capacity(Days)
1 1 90
1 2 90
1 3 90
.1 4 90
1 5 90
1 6 90
1 7 90
1 8 90
1 9 90
1 10 90
1 11 90
1 12 90
2 1 90
2 2 90
2 3 90
2 4 90
2 5 90
2 6 90
2 7 90
2 8 90
2 9 90
2 10 90
2 11 90
2 12 90
*Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
- ------------------------------------------------------- ---- ---- ----- -----g--------
289359 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-11-2007 CapacityPa a Page I of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner,who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation,increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 -Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding(see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- --- - - ----------------------------------------------------------------------
289359 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:4/11/2007 Specification Page 1

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over-spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
,grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways,waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers,toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
---------- --------------------------- ------- - ---------------------------------------
------ -------------- ---------------- ----- -----------------
289359 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:4/11/2007 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary,to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion,leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre-plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate-determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
- -------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------ ------------ ------------
289359 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed:4/11/2007 Specification Page 3

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT and
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590-633
Prepared for:. T-gr� CLW
By:.00'j Imo,
Farm: _ Tract: 53d _ Date: L( / 18 /_O7
-• To utilize agricultural wastes for
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT? livestock feed or as an energy source.
The conservation practice, Nutrient CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT
Management, is managing the amount, MANAGEMENT/WASTE UTILIZATION
source, placement, form and timing of the PLAN
application of nutrients and soil amendments
to achieve realistic production goals, while
minimizing nutrient movement to surface or The information provided in this Job
ground waters. The practice, Waste Sheet and the attachments meet the
Utilization, is using agricultural waste such as minimum requirements for a Nutrient
manure or wastewater in an environmentally Management Plan for USDA-NRCS
sound manner. These practices are jointly purposes. This Nutrient Management
accomplished through the development of a Plan includes:
Nutrient Manarement/Waste Utilization Plan, 1 A plan map and soils map for the area
which is normally part of a broader planned (these may be part of the
Conservation Plan that addresses multiple overall Conservation Plan).
natural resource concerns on the land. )
2. Location of designated sensitive areas
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT or resources (streams, wells,
and WASTE UTILIZATION PRACTICES sinkholes, etc.) and any associated
nutrient application setbacks, etc.
Your nutrient management/waste utilization -3. Your planned crop rotation.
plan is intended to accomplish one or more of
the following objectives: 4. Results of soil, plant, water tests.
• To budget nutrients for plant production. 5. Results from Phosphorus Loss
• To properly utilize manure or organic by- Assessment Tool (PLAT) or Leaching
products as a plant nutrient source. Index (LI) as required.
• To minimize the delivery of agricultural 6. Realistic yield expectations for the
nutrients to surface and ground water crops in the rotation, and their source
resources. if other than default values approved
• To maintain or improve the physical, for N.C.
chemical, and biological condition of the 7, Recommended nutrient application
soil. rates for nitrogen, phosphorus, and
potassium, as well as timing, form,
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 1

and method of application and REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT
incorporation, if applicable. MANAGEMENT')
8. This Job Sheet (or comparable You are required to acquire and comply
information), that provides the following: with all federal, state, or local permit
• General requirements of this practice, requirements related to the handling and
as well as additional requirements to application of manure or organic
meet the natural resource protection materials.
purposes listed above.
• Additional considerations specific to The nutrient management/waste
this plan. utilization plan must address all organic
waste generated at or brought to the
• Operation and maintenance facility. A Waste Utilization Third Party
information associated with this Agreement must exist to address all
practice. organic waste not handled by the nutrient
Because this Nutrient Management Plan management/waste utilization plan.
includes agricultural organic sources, Manure or organic wastes will not be
additional items are required in the plan to applied to the following areas:
ensure proper waste utilization: . surface waters,
• Waste Utilization Agreement (if . wetlands, unless constructed as a
applicable) component in a waste treatment
• Waste Utilization Third Party system,
Agreement (if applicable) . soils subject to frequent flooding
• Additional engineering design and during the period when flooding is
operating information for waste storage expected,
structures, transport, and application frozen, snow-covered, or saturated
system, as applicable. These designs, soils,
and the instructions for operating these . within 200 feet of a dwelling other
structures, is an integral component of than those owned by the producer,
your overall Nutrient Management/ . within 100 feet of a well,
Waste Utilization Plan.
• Emergency Action Plan to prevent • within 25 feet of surface waters, or
overtopping or other discharges from • within any other setbacks as identified
storage structures or facilities, as by federal, state, or local laws or
applicable. regulations (e.g. NC General Statute
prevents swine lagoon effluent from
This plan was developed based on the current being applied within 75 feet of a
NRCS 590 and 633 standards and Federal, residential property boundary or
state, or local regulations or policies. perennial stream or river if the facility
Changes in laws or regulations may was sited on or after October 1995.)
necessitate a revision of the plan.
Manure or organic Wastes will be applied
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE in a manner not to reach surface waters,
UTILIZATION wetlands (unless constructed as a
component in a waste treatment system),
General property owned by others, or public right-
of-way.
All manure and organic residues must be
applied according to a nutrient management Sludge that accumulates in waste storage
plan (see the following section, "BASIC structures must be analyzed prior to land
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 2

application. Adequate provisions (available The realistic yield expectations (RYEs) in
land and/or third party manure agreements) this plan are based on one or more of the
must exist to ensure sludge is applied in following:
adherence to all nutrient application Default values approved by the N.C.
requirements. All federal and state guidance Interagency Nutrient Management
regarding the proper testing, handling, Committee that incorporate soil
planning, and application of sludge must be productivity information, yield data,
followed for regulated operations. and research with North Carolina
soils, and cropping systems.
Since compliance with all applicable North Additional information on the default
Carolina laws is the responsibility of the values may be found at:
producer, you should consult the most current
version of the Guidance Memo for www.soil.ncsu.edulnmpincnmWglindex.htm
Implementing the Environmental Management
Commission's Regulations for Animal Waste -• Documented actual yield data from
Management for questions. the site, determined by the average of
the highest three yields of the last five
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR consecutive specific crop harvests.
PROVIDING LIVESTOCK FEED (For forage crops, determine the
average of the highest three years of
If applicable, all agricultural wastes or other the last five years.)
organic residues used for feedstock must be . A fertilization rate recommended by
handled in a manner to minimize North Carolina State University may
contamination and preserve its feed value. be used in cases where no yield data
Chicken litter stored for this purpose must be or approved RYE values exist for a
covered. A qualified animal nutritionist shall crop.
develop rations that utilize animal wastes. An RYE inferred from a similar crop
on a soil with similar physical and
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR chemical features may be used for
PROVIDING A SOURCE OF ENERGY new crops or in the absence of other
RYE data. This inferred RYE may
If your facility is to be used for energy ONLY be specified by a certified
production, all energy producing components Nutrient Management planner,
of the system are included in the Nutrient
Management/Waste Utilization Plan and Erosion, runoff, and water management
provisions for the utilization of residues of controls have been planned, as needed,
energy production identified. Your Nutrient on fields that receive nutrients.
Management Plan includes the use of these
residues, if applicable. Soil Testing
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT This nutrient management plan has been
MANAGEMENT developed based on current soil test
General results (no older than three years).
Soil samples must be collected and
Application of nutrients must comply with all prepared in accordance with North
applicable Federal, state, and local laws and Carolina State University or the North
regulations. Carolina Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services (NCDA&CS)
Agronomic Division standards or
recommendations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 3

Soil test analyses can be performed by any NCDA&CS Agronomic Division, or others
laboratory or program that is certified by the certified by the NCDENR.
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of Field Risk Assessment
Water Quality, Laboratory Section.
A field-specific assessment of the
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division uses the potential for phosphorus transport from
Mehlich-3 extractant process for soil testing. each field (or groups of similar fields)
Growers who utilize other laboratories must have been conducted, using the North
request the use of the Mehlich-3 methodology Carolina Phosphorus Loss Assessment
to ensure the test results are compatible with Tool (PLAT)
North Carolina's nutrient management
planning and assessment tools. For statewide PLAT assesses the potential for
consistency, all laboratories used must phosphorus (P) to be transported from the
provide fertilization recommendations using site to surface water through each of the
guidelines and methodologies as referenced four primary loss pathways:
at the NCDA&CS website: • sediment-bound P transported
through erosion,
www.ncar�r.com/agronomi/obook.htm . soluble P transported through
Growers are encouraged to use a laboratory surface runoff,
that is supported by field research within the • soluble P leached through the soil
state. profile, and
• non-incorporated source P
Soil testing shall include analysis for all transported through surface
nutrients for which specific information is runoff.
needed to develop the nutrient plan.
Based on the assessment of each loss
Plant Tissue Testing pathway, PLAT produces a single rating
for each field. As shown below, this
Tissue sampling and testing, when used, shall rating will identify whether nitrogen or
be done in accordance with North Carolina phosphorus shall be the rate-determining
State University or NCDA&CS standards or element in developing the planned
recommendations. application rate for manure.
Manure Testing PLAT Rating I Nutrient Application Criteria
LOW Nitrogen-based manure
Nutrient values of manure and organic by- application.
products shall be established for planning MEDIUM Nitrogen-based manure
purposes based on laboratory analysis, application.
acceptable default values, or historic records HIGH Manure application limited to
for the operation. phosphorus removal from site
in harvested plant biomass.
When determining actual application rates, a rVERY HIGH No additional manure
application to be specified in
laboratory analysis is required. State plan for the site.
regulations require that waste be tested within
60 days of utilization for some operations. In On all sites, regardless of the PLAT
the case of daily spreading,the waste must be rating, starter fertilizers may be
sampled and analyzed at least once a year. recommended in accordance with NCSU
Acceptable laboratories include the guidelines or recommendations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 4

In some cases, specific conservation practices nutrients that exceeds the soil test
that reduce the potential for phosphorus recommendation.
transport have been incorporated into PLAT.
Examples include buffers or filter strips, . When the plan is being implemented
ponds, water table management, and residue on a phosphorus standard (a PLAT
management and conservation tillage. rating of High or Very High), manure
Similarly, soil erosion rates, either existing or or other organic by-products shall be
planned, have been incorporated into your applied at rates consistent with the
PLAT analysis. This information is shown on phosphorus application guidance
the PLAT results enclosed. Because the below. In such situations, an
management of the site actually affects the additional nitrogen application from
PLAT rating, all practices identified on the non-organic.sources may be required
PLAT analysis (including any required to to supply nitrogen at the rate
achieve the specified erosion rate) must be recommended by the RYE.
either already installed or included in a
Conservation Plan for the Nutrient • Within the limits allowed by PLAT,
Management Plan to be approved. manure_or other organic by-products
may be applied on soybeans at rates
Nutrient Application Rates equal to the estimated removal of
nitrogen in harvested plant biomass.
Recommended nutrient application rates are
based on North Carolina State University or All nitrogen rates for hay production
NCDA&CS recommendations that consider are for pure grass stands. Due to the
current soil test results, RYEs, and nutrient recycling by grazing animals,
management. the planned nitrogen rate per unit
yield for hay crops shall be reduced
Liming material shall be applied as needed to by 25% for the portion of the expected
adjust soil pH to the specific range required by yield that is removed through grazing.
the crop or crops in the rotation for optimum
availability and utilization of nutrients. Phosphorus Application—When
manure or other organic by-products
The application amount and rate (in/hr)for are used, the planned rates of
liquid wastes (e.g. applied through irrigation) phosphorus application shall be based
shall not result in runoff from the site. The on the PLAT rating for the site, as
application shall not exceed the field capacity follows:
of the soil.
Low or Medium Rating —The
The planned rates of nutrient application are planned manure or organic by-
shown on the attached sheets. These rates product application rate is based
have been computed as follows: on the nitrogen needs of the crop.
• Nitrogen Application - When the plan is High Rating —The planned
nitrogen-based (a PLAT rating of Low or manure or organic by-product
Medium), the application rate of manure or application rate is limited to the
organic by-products shall be based on the phosphorus removal rate of the
recommended nitrogen rate using the RYE harvested plant biomass.
for the site (or a rate recommended by
NCSU or NCDA in the case of crops Very High Rating — No additional
without established RYEs). This may manure or organic by-product
result in an application rate for other application is specified in the plan.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 5

On all sites, regardless of the PLAT rating, plant nutrient uptake characteristics, while
starter fertilizers containing nitrogen, considering cropping system limitations,
phosphorus, and potassium may be weather and climatic conditions, and field
recommended in accordance with North accessibility. Nutrients shall not be
Carolina State University guidelines or applied to frozen, snow-covered, or
recommendations. saturated soil.
A single application of phosphorus applied Manure or organic by-products shall not
as manure or organic by-product may be be applied more than 30 days prior to
made at a rate equal to the recommended planting of the crop or forages breaking
phosphorus application or estimated dormancy.
phosphorus removal in harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple For nutrients applied through irrigation
years in the crop sequence. systems, application equipment should be
properly calibrated to ensure uniform
• When such single applications are distribution of material at planned rates.
made, the rate shall:
♦ not exceed the recommended Plan Review and Revision Period
nitrogen application rate during the
year of application, or A thorough review and revision (if
needed) of the nutrient management plan
♦ not exceed the estimated nitrogen shall be conducted on a regular cycle, not
removal in harvested plant bia- -
mass during the year of application to exceed five years.
when there is no recommended Heavy Metals Monitoring
nitrogen application, or
♦ not be made on sites with a Very For animal waste, including sludge, zinc
High PLAT risk rating. and copper concentrations shall be
• Potassium Application — Planned monitored and alternative crop sites for
potassium application rates should application shall be sought when these
match the soil test recommended rates metals approach excessive
as closely as possible. (This is concentrations. The following criteria and
particularly critical in situations where a actions are provided:
potentially harmful nutrient imbalance
in crops or forages may occur, such as
grass tetany). When using manure or ZINC --
other organic sources, the addition of Mehlich-3 Index Action
potassium from non-organic sources IZn-I1
300(21 Ibs/ac) Peanuts are very sensitive to
may be required. zinc,and application on peanuts
• Other Plant Nutrients -The planned should be limited.Seek
rates of application of other nutrients if alternative sites when possible.
applicable are consistent with North The risk of zinc toxicity is
Carolina State University or the greater with low soil pH and hasbeen seen at Zn-1 as low as
NCDA&CS guidelines or 300.*
recommendations. 500(35 Ibslac) Critical toxic level for peanuts.
Cease application on peanuts.*
Nutrient Application Timing 2,000(142 Caution;Seek alternative sites
lbs/ac) when possible for all crops.*
3,000(213 Critical toxic level for all crops,
Timing of nutrient application shall Ibs/ac) Cease application for all crops.*
correspond as closely as possible with
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 6

likely source. The Leaching Index (LI)
COPPER Mehlich-3Index Actlon is included in this plan.
cu-I While the results of the LI does not affect
2,000(72 Ibs/ac) Caution:Seek alternative sites
when possible for all crops.* your planned nutrient application rates,
3,000(108 Critical toxic level for all crops. some additional conservation practices
Ibs/ac) Cease application on all crops.* may be.specified in the plan to reduce the
*Maintain pH at 6.0 on these risk of nutrient movement from the field, if
sites. applicable.
When sewage sludge is applied, the IMPORTANCE OF MANAGING
accumulation of potential pollutants (including NUTRIENTS
arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, selenium,
and zinc) in the soil shall be monitored in Nitrogen and phosphorus are water
accordance with the US Code, Reference 40 soluble elements and either or both may
CFR, Parts 403 and 503, and applicable state be components of organic and inorganic
and local laws or regulations. Additional fertilizers. In soluble forms, both can
information on heavy metal criteria for sewage move with water as leachate down
sludge may be found in Land Application of through the soil, or over the soil surface
Sewage Sludge, EPA/831-B-93-002b as runoff after rainfall. While nitrogen and
publication number at: phosphorus exist in different forms and
http://_ww_w.eEa.govInpdes/aubs/sludgel. df may move through different transport
processes on the same site, they both
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR can have detrimental effects on both
MINIMIZING DELIVERY OF NUTRIENTS TO surface and shallow ground water quality.
SURFACE AND GROUND WATER As an example, excess nutrients can
result in accelerated eutrophication with
In areas that have been identified as impaired severe algal blooms and fish kills.
with agricultural nutrients being a likely
source, an assessment shall be completed of Because of the topography, hydrology,
the potential for nitrogen or phosphorus and other factors in the state, the
transport from the site. (The streams/water environmental problems from excess
bodies in this category are listed in the USDA- nutrients reaching surface water may not
NRCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section be exhibited near the contributing source,
I.l but rather create water quality problems
far downstream. Consequently, the
Neuse River Basin, Tar-Pamlico Basin,
❑ NO the Chowan River, the watershed of the
This nutrient management plan IS NOT in B. Everett Jordan Reservoir, and the
an area where surface waters are watershed of the New River in Onslow
impaired, with agricultural nutrients County are listed as Nutrient Sensitive
identified as a likely source. The Leaching waters in North Carolina.
Index (LI) is not required. Nitrogen: Nitrogen applied as fertilizer or
organic material is transformed into
YES nitrate and can move with the water
moving downward into the shallow ground
This nutrient management plan IS in an water and eventually to surface waters.
area where surface waters are impaired, (Relatively small amounts of nitrogen
with agricultural nutrients identified as a reach our surface waters through rainfall
runoff. ) The Leaching Index (LI) is a
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 7

required part of the nutrient management plan are needed. (The S.B. 1217
in some areas of the.state with surface water interagency group guidelines
impairments. The LI uses soils information accepted by the N.C. Division of
and local climate data to assess the potential Water Quality for .0200 operations
hazard from leaching of nutrients. The results specify a plan revision when there are
of the LI analysis and recommended actions changes in crops or cropping patterns
are included in your nutrient management that utilize more than 25 percent of
plan, if applicable. the nitrogen generated by the
operation.) As a minimum, nutrient
Phosphorus: Research in recent decades management plans shall be
indicates that, with high soil phosphorus thoroughly reviewed every five years
levels, phosphorus has more potential to be and revised if necessary. The next
transported off-site than recognized in the review will be performed in
past. Phosphorus can be transported in
several ways: (1) attached to soil particles
leaving the field through erosion, (2) in soluble 2. Protect fertilizer and organic by-
form leaving the field in surface runoff, and (3) product storage facilities from weather
in soluble form leaching downward through and accidental leakage or spillage.
the soil profile, and eventually into surface
water. Unlike nitrogen, the most likely 3. Ensure proper calibration'of
transport pathway for phosphorus varies by application equipment to ensure
site, and depends upon such factors as soil uniform distribution of material at
erosion rate, soil phosphorus levels, texture of planned rates.
soils, existence of buffers, and other factors.
In N.C., PLAT is the tool used to assess 4. Inspect and maintain the equipment
potential excessive phosphorus losses. The and facilities used to implement the
results of the PLAT analysis and Nutrient Management/Waste _
recommended actions are included in your Utilization Plan regularly. Any needed
nutrient management plan, if applicable. repairs should be made in a timely
manner.
If a site receives a PLAT rating of Low or
Medium, then applying manure at rates based 5. Review the Emergency Action Plan, if
on the nitrogen needs of the crop is allowed. applicable, annually.
It is important to realize that this may result in
phosphorus being applied at rates that 6. Records should be maintained for five
significantly exceed the crop's phosphorus years, or for a period as required by
removal rate. In these cases, the planned other Federal, state, or local
nutrient application rate is not sustainable, ordinances, or program or contract
and eventually a PLAT rating of High may be requirements. To ensure adequate
reached. information exists to support sound
nutrient management, NRCS
recommends the following records be
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE included:
You are responsible for safe operation and • Soil test results and .
for nutrient
maintenance of this practice, including all application,
equipment. The following Operation & Quantities, analyses and sources
Maintenance should be conducted: of nutrients applied (When the
1 Review the plan annually to determine if actual rates used exceed the
adjustments or modifications to the plan recommended and planned rates
on inorganic fertilizer plans,
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 8

records should indicate the reasons for
the differences, e.g. inability to acquire
custom blended fertilizer.)
Dates and method of nutrient
applications,
• Crops planted, planting and harvest
dates, yields, and crop residues
removed,
• Results of water, plant, and organic by-
product analyses, and
• Dates of review and person performing
the review, and recommendations that
resulted from the review.
NOTE: State laws or regulations may
define record-keeping requirements for
some operations.
7 Ensure that workers are protected from
and avoid unnecessary contact with
inorganic fertilizers and organic by-
products. Protection should include the
use of protective clothing when working
with plant nutrients. Extra caution must be
taken when handling ammonia sources of
nutrients, or when dealing with organic
wastes stored in poorly ventilated
enclosures.
8. Properly dispose of material generated by
the cleaning of nutrient application
equipment. Excess material should be
collected and stored or field applied in an
appropriate manner. Excess material
should not be applied on areas of high
potential risk for runoff or leaching.
9. Properly dispose of or recycle nutrient
containers according to state and local
guidelines or regulations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590(August,2003) Page 9

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 3
Double-Crop Soybeans,Piedmont
Double-crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no-tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations.Review the NCSU Official Variety"green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15"rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However,applications of 20-3 0 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans.Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
5: Piedmont
Double-crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no-tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15"rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen.However,applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are.sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor.Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
----------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------
289359 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-11-2007 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 12, 13, 6, 7, 8
Double-Crop Soybeans, Piedmont
Double-crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no-tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations.Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15" rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-301bs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
5: Piedmont
Double-crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no-tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15"rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans.Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------
289359 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-11-2007 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 10,2,4,6, 7
Double-Crop Soybeans,Piedmont
Double-crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July Ah.
When no-tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book"and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15"rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
1/2" and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen.However, applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor. Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
5: Piedmont
Double-crop soybeans should be planted as early in June as possible with planting completed by July 4th.
When no-tilling soybeans in small grain straw, it is essential to manage the straw to achieve adequate
plant populations.Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private
companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions.
Plant 4-6 seed/row foot for 7-8" drills and 6-8 seed/row foot for 15" rows. Seeding depth should be 1-1
1/2"and adequate depth control is essential. Phosphorus and potash recommended for the soybeans can
be applied to the wheat in the Fall. Soybeans produce their own nitrogen and are normally grown without
additions of nitrogen. However,applications of 20-30 lbs/acre N are sometimes made at planting to
promote early growth and vigor.Tissue samples can be analyzed during the growing season to monitor
the overall nutrient status of the soybeans. Timely management of weeds and insects is essential for
profitable double crop soybean production.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1,2, 9
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10(best)and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed.Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass.Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25"in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations.Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only.Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques.Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac.N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production;reduce N rates by 25%for grazing.Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and
Aug.20 to Sept. 30,with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------
289359 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-11-2007 Crop Note Page Page 3 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 11, 2
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10(best)and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed.Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass.Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25"in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques.Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac.N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25%for grazing.Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30,with equal amounts in each window.Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1,2,3, 5, 8
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well-adapted.
In the Piedmont,tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10(best)and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure-stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed.Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25"to 0.5"deep for pure stands, 0.25"in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime,phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations.Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques.Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac.N to
pure-stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25%for grazing.Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30,with equal amounts in each window.Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 3
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont,corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn.Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production.Plant a cover crop after harvest.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
289359 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-11-2007 Crop Note Page Page 4 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 12, 13, 6, 7, 8
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs.nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting.Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production.Plant a cover crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 10, 2,4, 6, 7
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2"deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book"and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs.nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting.Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production.Plant a cover crop after harvest.
- - ------------------- ----------------------------- --------------- ---------------
289359 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-11-2007 Crop Note Page Page 5 of 7
i

The following crop note applies to field(s): 3
Small Grain Silage,Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5%for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10%when
planting no-till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety "green book"and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20%for no-till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February-March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases,weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 12, 13, 6, 7, 8
Small Grain Silage,Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5%for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10%when
planting no-till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20% for no-till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February-March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs.N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases,weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•------------------------------------- ---------------
289359 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-11-2007 Crop Note Page Page 6 of 7

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 10,2,4,6, 7
Small Grain Silage,Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5%for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10%when
planting no-till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety "green book"and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planting.
Increase N at planting by 20%for no-till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February-March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs.N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases.weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------
289359 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 04-11-2007 Crop Note Page Page 7 of 7

Nitrogen Application Rate Calculated Using Soil Type and
Realistic Yield Table For Chatham Count
SOIL TYPE 205B Georaeville silt loam 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
2 5B t rrain _ 104 lbs N/ac Auv,-April
205B Wheat rain 132lbs /ac Au - ril
205B Barley rain 88lbs /ac Au -A ri
205B Rye grain 132 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
205B Com for grain 1191 s /ac Feb-July
205B Com for ila e 228 lbs N/ac Feb-July Sorghum for grain 144 lbs N/ac Aril- ul
205B Sorehum silage 228 lbs N/ac April-July
205B Soybeans 140 lbs N/ac Aril-Se t EEII
205B Sor h -Sudanerass for hay 180 lbs /ac April-August
Sudanarass for hay 180 1 Aril-Au-gust
205B Fescue180 lbs Nlac A ru t- ul
2 r _ gram * ha 180 lbs ac u ust-Jul
205B Small --rain for hay 120 lbs /ac AuG-A ri
Rv eQrass for hay 180 IN N/ac Feb-Ma
205B Sudan-grass for grazing 135 1April-August
205B Fescue for grazing 135 lbs N/ac August-July
205B Orchard ass for L-razinQ 135 lbs Au ust- ul
205B Sall arain for grazine 90bs N/ac Au -A ril
205B R eg-a s for grazinu 135 lbs N/ac Feb-Ma
05B Matua rass for hay 180 lbs N/ac Aullust-july
205B Matua for razin 135 lbs /ac Aufnig-july
SOIL TYPE 205B2 Geor eville silty clay loam 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
205B2 Oat ain u -A ril
205B2 Wheat uain 112 lbs a ril
205B2 Barley ain 75 lbs N/ac -A ril
205B2 Rye ain 1121 Aug-Aivil
205B2 Corn grain ac Feb-Jul
205B2 Com silaee 194 lbs N/ac Feb-July
Soybeans9-lbs ac April-Sept
205B2 Soritum rain 1221 s N/ac Aril-Jul
205B2 or hum sila e 1 41 s N/ac Aril-Jul
205B2 Sorghum- Sudanwass for hay 153 lbs N/acApril-August
205B2 Sudan rass for hay 153 lbs ac Aril-Au ust
205B2 Fescue hay 153 lbs /ac August-July
205B2 Orchard ass hay 153 lbs N/ac Au st- ul
205B2 Small main hay 102 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
205B2 _ Rvegrass for hav 153 1 Feb-Ma
205B2 Sudangrass for g-razin2 115 lbs /ac ril-Au ust
2 5 2 Fescue for grazing 115 lbs N ac August-July
205B2 Orchardgrass for uazing 115 lbs ac August-July
205B mall grain for arazing 87 lbs ac Au--A ril
205B2 R e •ass for razing 151bs /ac Feb-May
205B2 Matua for hay 153 lbs N/ac Au ust- ul
205B2 Matua for grazing, 115 lbs N/ac August-July
1

SOIL TYPE_ 205C Geor eville silt loam 6 to 10 % slopes APPL.DATE
05C Oat Qrain 96 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
205C Wheatarain 121 lbs Au -A ril
205C Barley-min 81 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
205C Rye rain 121 lbs / c Au--A ril
205C Com3rain 109 lbs N/acFeb-Jul
205C Com-silue 210 lbs N/ac Feb-July
205C Somhum ar 'n 1 21 s /ac Aril-Jul
Sorizhum silaize210 1 April-July
Soybeans 129 lbs N/ac Aril- e t
u - Sud grass hav 166 lbs N/ac Aril-Au ust
Sudan-prass hay 166 lbs N/ c April-August
205C Fescue hay 166 lbs a
205C Orcharderass hav Au° t- ul
205C Small alrain hay 110 lbs N/ c Auv-A ril
205C Rvegrj&jfQLhay 166 lbs N/ c Feb-Ma
205C Sudangrassr 241 - u ust
205C Fescue for grazing 124 lbs N/ac Au_,ust-Julv
205C Orcharduassarazine 1241bs N/ac Awu t-Jul
205 Small train for Urazine A-2 lbs / cAu2-Avril
205C R ve-frass for Urazin Feb-May
205C Mataia for hay 166 lbs N/ac Au ust- ul
205C Matua for yrazin Apt-Jul
SOIL TYPE 205C2 G_ eor°eville silt clay' loam 6 to 10% slopes APPL. DATE
205C2 Oat _,rain 84 lbs N/ac Aug-April
205 2 Wheat rain 106 lbs /ac Aug-April
_205C2 Barley grain 72 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
_ c Au -A ril
in 95 lb N ac Feb-July
_205C2 Com silage182 lbs N/ac Feb-July
205C2 Sorg-hum erain 120 1 1- ul
205 2 o hum silage 1 21bs N/ac April-July
205C2 Soybeans 112 lbs N/ac Aril- e t
205 2 Sorp-hum-Sudanyrass hay 144 lbs /ac Anril-August
_205C2 Sudanuass hay 144 lbs N/ac Anril-Auvust
Fescue bay 144Au-ust- ul
rchard ass ha ' 144lbs ac Au ust- ul
205C2 Small --rain hay v-
205 2 R crass for hav lbs N/ac Feb-May
_205C2 S dan ass for azin 108 lbs N/ac Apffl-Autzust
205 2 Fescue for Ur zi - 108 l c
205 2 Orchard rass for --razing 108 lbs N/ac
205 2 Small ain for razin 721bs /ac Aup-Ai2ril
205C2 R reurass for grazine 108 l ac Fcb-May
_205C2 Matua for hay 144 lbs N/ac Au ust- ul
205C2 Matua for Urazin 108 lbs N/ac Au-ust- ulv
SOIL TYPE 206C2 Geor eville silty clay loam 6 to 10 % slopes APPL. DATE
E2VLC2 Oats for -rain 84 lbs /ac Au -A ril
6C2 Wheat for grainAup_-Avril
2

206C2 Barley for erain 72 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
206C2 Rye for Riain 1061bs N/ac Aug-April
206C2 Corn for Prain 951bs N ac Feb-Jul
206C2 Corn for silage 1821bs N/ac Feb-Jul
206C2 Sor- u for rain 120 lbs Mae April-July
206C2 Sor um for silave 1821bs N/ac A 1-July
206C2 Soybeans 1121 April-Sent
206C2 Sor chum- udan rass hay 1441bs ac April-Aupaust
206C2 Sudamarass hay 1441bs N/ac April-Auizust
206C2 Fescue hay 1441 ac August-July
206C2 Orchard ass hay 1441bs N/ac Augmst-July
206C2 Small grain hay 96 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
206C2 R ved-rass for ha 144 lbs N/ac Feb-Ma
206C2 Sudangrass for arazing108 1 /ac Aril-August
206C2 Fescue for-p-razing 1081bs Mac u - ul
206C2 OrchardpTass for razin 1 81bs n/ac August-July
206C2 Small grain for grazing, 721bs N/ac Aug7ADjU
206C2 R e rass for grazin 1081bs n/ c
206C2 Matua for hay 1441 s N c ul
20 Matua for Urazin:c_ 1 8 1 s /ac Au ust- ul
SOIL TYPE 212B Herdon silt loam 2 to 6 % sloIles APPL. DATE
212B Oat arain 1041bs N/ac Au -A ril
212B Wheat rain _ 1 21 ac Au -A ril
212B Barley rain 88 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
212B Rye grain 1321bs /ac -A ril
212B Corn uain 119 lbs N/ac Feb-Jul
212B Corn sila e 2281bs N/ac Feb-July
212B or hum rain 1381bs N/ac Aril-Jul
212B Son-,hum silaQe 2281bs N/ac Aril-Jul
212B Soybeans 140 Ibs N/ac April-Sept
212B SAnril-Au-vust
212B Sudanizrass hay 175 ust
212B Fescue hay 175 lbs N/ac AuUust-Jul
212B Orchard grass hay 175 lbs N/ac August-July
212B Small rain hay 1201bs N/ac Au -A ril
212B R e ass for hay 175 lbs N/ac Feb-Ma
212B Sudan grass for izrazinp 131 lbs /ac Aril-Au ust
212B Fescue for grazing1 c +Au2aust-Julv
212B Orchardmss for azing 131 lbs N/ac Au ust-Jul
212B Small grain for iarazina 901bs N/ac Aug-April
212B R e-rass for razing 131 1 s /ac Feb-May
212B Matua for hay 175 lbs N/ac Au ust- u
2 _ Matua for azin-, 111 1 s N/ac Auaust- ul
SOIL TYPE 212C and 212D Herdon silt loam 6 to 10% APPL. DATE
and 10 to 15 % slopes
212C Oat grain 96 lbs N/ac Aug-April
212C Wheat grain 121 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
912C Barley grain 81 lbs N/ac Aug-Aoril
212C Rye arain 121 lbs N/ c 1
212C Com grain1091N/ac Feb-July
3

212C Com Silage 2101bs N/ac Feb-July
212 Sorg-hum vrain 127 lbs N/ac April-July
212C Sorehum silage 210 lbs N/ac Aril-Jul
212C Soybeans 129 lbs N/ac April-Sent
212C Sory-hum Sudamass ha Aril-Au ust
212C Sudanuassha Aril-Au ust
212C Fescue hay 161 «
212C Orchardf4rassr 161 lbs N/ac ri -July
212C Small rain hay 110 lb -A 1
212C R ass for hay 161 lbs N/ac Feb-May
212C Sudan rass for arazing 121 1 ac Aril-August
212C Fescue azi 121 lbs ac August-July
Orchard rass for P--razinv 121 lbs N/ac Aw4ust-July
Small xrain for P-razin2 821 s a Au,T- ril
212C Ryeizrass for 2razin2 121 lbs
212C Matua for hay 161lbs /ac Aug-ust-July
212C Matua for razin 121 1 Au R«st- ul
SOIL TYPE 212D2 Herdon silt claN loam 10 to 15 % slo es APPL. DATE
212D2 Oat rain Au -A ril
Wheat arain ac Au r-A ril
212D2 Barley uain 70 lbs N/acAuiz-Anril
. 212D2 r ' 1061bs N/ac Auiz-Anril
212D2 Com ain Feb-Jul
12D2 Com sila 1 21 Feb-Jul
. 212D2 r --rain 1101 Aril- ul
212D2 um silaze 182 lbs Mae Aril-Jul
212D2 Soybeans 1121bs
212D2 Sorehum Sudang-rasshay 140 lbs N/ac Mril-Aupaust
212D2 Sudangrass hay140lbs /a ust
. 212D2 Fescue hav 1401bs N/ c A
2 2 2 Orcharduass h August-July
212D2 Small arai s /ac Aug-A ril
212D2 Rvey-rass for hay 140 1 Feb-May
212D2 n r ss for grazing1121 s /ac u t
212D2 Fescue for araziniz 112 lbs N/ac
212D2 Orchardgrass for P-razing1 August-July
212D2 Small uain for grazing ac Aug-April
212D2 Rvegrass for ina 112 lbs N/ac Feb-Mav
212D2 Matua for hay 140 lbs Nlac Au ust- ulv
212D2 Matua for uazin2 112lbs ac Au-Qust-Julv
SOIL TYPE 520C Cid silt loam 6 to 10% slopes APPL. DATE
Oat s4rain 60 lb N Auif-A iril
520C Wheat uain 99 1 Au -A it
520C Barley rain 66lbs N/ac Aug.-Aiirfl
b N/ac . Au ri l
520C Com suain 921 /ac
520C Com s /ac Feb-July
520C Sorghum ain 92 1Avril-July
m sil 771bs N/ac April-July
120C Soybeans 921bs a April-Sent
4

520C Sor-Qhum Sudan grass hay 129 1 /ac Aril-Au ist
520C Sudan ass hay 12 1 ac Aril-Au us
520C Fescue hay 129 lbs N/ac Au ust- ul
520C Orchard2rass hay 129 lbs N/ac Au st-Jul
520C Small ain ha c A -A ril
520C Rvesuass for hay 1291 -Ma
520C Sudanuass for aazing 97 a —April-August
520C Fescue for i4razing 97 lbs N ac August-July
520C Orchardgrass for azin 7 lbs N/ c August-Jul
520C Small rain for zi a 82 lbs /ac Au - ril
520C etrass for razin 97 lbs N/ac Feb-Ma
520C Matua for hav 129 lbs N/ac August-Jul
520C Matuafox.arazin« 971b ac August Jul _
SOIL TYPE 35B Wedowee sandx loam 2 to 6 % slo )es APPL. DATE
35B Oat Parain 1171 s N/ac Au -A ril
35B Wheat urain 144 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
35B Barley zrain 961bs N/ac Auii-A ril
35B Rye .Drain 144 lbs N/ac Aua- ,)ril
35B Corn -rain 113 lbs N/ac Feb-Jul
5B Com silage 2161bs N/ac Feb-Jul
35B Sorahum vain 113 lbs N/ac Aril-Jul
35B Sorydium sila a 216 lbs /ac April-July
35B Soybeans 140 lbs N/ac Aril- e t
35B S r hum udan ass hay 150 lbs N/ac Aril-Au 1st
35B udanrass hay 150 lbs N/ac Anril-August
35B Fescue hay 150 lbs N/ac Au!ust-Jul
35B Orchardizrass hay 150 lbs ac August-July
35B Small zrain hay 120 lbs N/ac Ajug-Aoril
35B R e ass for hay 15 /a Feb-May
35B Sudan rass for yrazing 113 lbs N/ac ril-Au ust
35B Fescue for 7razin 113 lbs N/ac Au u t-Jul
SB Orchard rass for izrazing, 113 lbs N/ac Au2i]st- ul
35B all main for 2razin2 90 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
35B R ass for 2razinalbs N/aFeb-May
35B M tua for hay 150 lbs NAueust-July
B Matua for grazing 113 lbs N August-July
SOIL TYPE 57C Vance sand• loam 2 to 6 % sloIles APPL. DATE
57C Oat suain 1081bs ac Au -A ril
57C Wheat in 1321bs N Aug--April
57C Barley rain 96lbs ac A -A ril
57C Rye RTain c Au -A ri
57C Corn �r i ac Feb-July
57C Corn sila e 1 71b N/ac Feb-July.
57C Sorghum erain 92 lbs N/ac ril-July
57C Sony-hum sila e 177 1 April-July
57C Soybeans 129 lbs N/ac- Aril- e t
Sor hum Sudan ass hay 175 lbs N/ac Aril-Au list
57C Sudan ass hay 175 lbs N/ac A il-August
57C Fescue ha 1 .1 /ac Au us - ul
57C OrchardiaTass hay 175 lb ac Au' ust- ul
57C Small ain hay 110 lbs /ac Au -A ril
5

R e ass for hay 175 lbs N/ac Feb-May
Sudan grass for uazing 131 lbs N/ac Aril- ul
Fescue for Prazina 131 lbs N/ac A ust-Jul
rchard rass for Pr i 131 lbs N/ac Au ust-Jul
57C Small grain for razin 82 lbs N ac ril
57 r 131 lbs N/ac -Ma
57C Matua for hay 175 lbs /ac A - ul
57C Matua for arazing 131 lbs Nlac t- ul
SOIL TYPE 50D Nanford-Badin com}lex 10 to 15 % slopes APPL. DATE
D Oat yrain 84 A -A ril
Wheat uain Au -A ril
Br c Au -Aril
Rye Train Au -A ril
50D Com grain 1 Feb-July
50D Com silage 1991bs Feb-July
50D Sor2hurn grain 1 41 nil-Jul
D vhum silage 199 1 -Jul
D Soybeans 110 lbs I c A-ril- e of
50D orC7h m Sudanuass h /ac koril- Must
50D Sudamn-ass hav 184lbsac A U st
Fescue hay 184 lbs /ac A st- ul
50D Orchardi�
rass hay 1841bs A
SOD Small grain hay 110 lbs N/ac Aug-April
-Ryeizrass for ha Feb-May
SOD Sudan grass for grazing 138 lbs N/ac April-August
50D Fescue for razi a Aupaust-Jubt-
50D Orchard—rass for 7-razina 138 ac Auuust-lulv
S0D Small uain for P-razin2 82 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
50D -Rv rass for uazina 138 lbs N/ac Feb-Ma
D Matua for hay 194 lbsN/acAugust-July
SOD Matua for grazing 138 lbs N/ac August-July
SOIL TYPE 130B Nanford-Badin complex 2 to 6 % slo es APPL. DATE
grain130B Oat Auer-A ril
130B — Wheat or rain 1 -A ril
130B Barley r r in 72 lbs N/ac A -A ril
130B Rye for grain 108 1 AuQ-A ril
130B Corn for yrain 1131b Feb-July
130B Corn for silay-e 216 1 Feb-July
130B Sorp-hum for erain 113 lbs N/ac Ai2ril-July
130B Sorghum silage 2161bs N/ac Aril-July
130B So beans 120 lbs N/ac April-Sept
130B Somhum200 lbs Mac Aril- Bust
130B Sudangrass for hay 200 lbs N ust
30B Fescue for hay 200 lbs N/ac A t- ul
130B Orcharduass fQrr hay Aup-ust-luly
B Small g-rain for ha\_ _ 1201 Auu-A ril
130B R `eirass for ha\ 200 1 Feb-Ma
130B Sudangrass for grazing 150 lbs N/ac April-August
6

130B -Fescue for-razing 1501bs N/ac Au ust-Jul
130B rchard rass for azin 150 lbs N/ac Au ust-Jul
130B Small grain for grazing 90 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
130B R e ass for grazina 150 lbs N/ac Feb-Ma
130B Matua for hay 200 lbs N/ac Au ust- ul
130B Matua for arazina 150 lbs N/ac August-July.
SOIL TYPE 130C Nanford-Badin complex 6 to 10 % slopes APPL. DATE
130C Oats for grain _ 85 lbs N/ac A -A ril
Wheat for grain _ 99 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
Barley for tzrain66 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
grain130C Rye for 99 lbs /ac Au -A ril
130C Com for lbs N/ac Feb-Jul
130C Com for silage199 lbs N/ac Feb-Jul
130C Sorghum for rain 104 lbs N/ac Aril- ul
130C Sorg-hum silaae 199 lbs N/ac Aril-Jul
130C Soruhum Sudarnrass or hay 184 lbs N ac An '1- ug st
130C Soybeans 110 lbs N/ac Avril-Se,t
130C Sudangrass for hay 184 lbs N/ac Mril-August
130C Fescue for hay 184 lbs N/ac Au 3u t- ul
130C Orchards uass for hay 184 lbs N ac August-Jul
130C Small grain for hay 110 lbs N/ac Au 7-A ril
130C Rvevrass for hay 184 lbs /ac Feb-Ma
130C Sudan rass for razin 138 1Ar)ril-Au,2ust
130C Fescue for grazing 138 lbs / cAuuust-July
130C Orcharduass for razing 138 lbs A
130C Small rain for razing 82 lbs ac Aufz-Anril
130C R e ass for razing 138 lbs N ac
130C Matua for ha Au Just-Ju
130C Matua for tarazim, 1. 138 lbs N/ac Auvu t- ul
SOIL TYPE 130D Nanford-Badin com olex 10 to 15 % slopes APPL. DATE
130D Oats for arain 85 1 =-A 1
130D Wheat for grain 99 1 / -A ril
130D Barley for grain 66 lbs N/ac Aug-Anril
130D Rye for rain 99 lbs N/ac Auv--Ai3ril
130D Corn for rain 104 lbs N/ac Feb-July
130D Com for sila e 199 lbs N/ac Feb-July
130D Sor hum for arain 98 lbs N/ac Aril- ul
130D Sorghum for silage 199 lbs N/ac Aril-Jul
130D or hum- udan ass for hay 184 lbs ac Aril-Au ust
130D Soyheans 110 lbs N/ac Aril- e t
130D Sudangrass for hay 184 lbs N/ac Aril-Au ust
130D Fescue for hay 184 lbs N/ac Au ust- ul
130D Orchardurass for ha • 184 lbs /ac Au ust-Jul
130D Small grain for hay 110 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
130D Aveparass for hay 184 lbs N/ac Feb-Ma
130D Sudangrass for grazine 138s ac Aril-Au ust
130D Fescue for erazine 138 lbs /ac u ust- ul
130D Orchardarass erazin for 138 lbsc Au ust- ul
130D I Small izrain azing for Au -A ril
130D Ryearass for grazin-g,
7

130D Matua for hay 184 lbs N/ac Au ust- ul
130D Matua for arazin! 138 1 /ac August-Jul
SOIL TYPE 51B Helena sandy loam 2 to 6 % slo es APPL. DATE
51B Oats for in 85 lbs N acAua-April
heat for grain 1321bs /ac 1
Barley for grain881b A - ril
-51B Rye for grain _ 132 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
51B Com for grain c Feb- ul
51B — Com for silage 2 ac F - lv
-51B or h arain 106 lbs /ac Aril- ul
51B or hum sila e 2 Aril- ul
1B -Soybeans 14 /ac ril- e t
51B r hum- udan rass for hay 1 c Aril-Au ust
51B udan rass for hay 1 - u ust
Fescue for hay 175 lb.-,N/ac A au - ul
B lbs N/ac A - 1
Small rain for hay 120 lbs N/ac A u-A riI
1B :e-uass for hay 175 1 Feb-Ma
51B Sudanarass for 2razine 131 lbs N/ac Avril-AuLmst
51B Fescue forraz' Au-Uiust-Julv
51B OrchardQrass for arazin 31 lbs N ac Am,, s - ul
Small arain for QrazinL, 90 1 Aug-April
-51B --Ry-tp-rass for guazin,4 1311 c Feb-Ma
-Matua for r zim 1 August-July
Matua for azin, 131 1 c gust-Jul
SOIL TYPE 30B Cecil gravelly sand) loam 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
30B Oats for rain 1 a Au«-A)ril
Wheat for erain c Au -A ril
-30B Barl v for --rain 96 lbs N/ac Au!-April
30B R •e for ain 1 Au -A ril
rn for uain 119 lbs /ac Feb-July
30B Com for sila e 2 Feb-July
or um for rain 150 lbs N/ac April-July
Sorg—hum 2281b / c ril- ul
30B Soybeans 140 1 Aril- e t
30B Sorg-hum Sudanarass for hav 22 April-Au-Rust
30B Sudan2rass for ha 225 lbs N/ac A)ril-Au ust
-30B Fescue for hay 2251 s N/ac Auzust- ul
Orchard-u-ass for hay 225 lbs N/ac Au ti st- ul
30B Small P-rain fora 120 lbs N/ac 1
rass for bay 225 lbs N/ac - a
Sudanarasso r i /ac Aril-Au ust
30B Fescue for razing 169 lbs N/ac
B Orcharderass for arazin Au ust- ul
Small rain for razin 901bs N/ac u -Aoril
ra f 169 lbs N/ac
3 Matua for hay 225 lbsN/ac August-July
30B Matua for razi , 1691bs N/ac Aup-ust-July
8

SOIL TYPE 37B Wedowee sandy loam 2 to 6 % slo es APPL. DATE
37B Oats for grain 117 lbs Nlao Au2-A ril
37B Wheat for ain 144 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
37B Barley for arain 96 lbs N/ac Au -A it
37B Rye for grain 144 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
37B Corn for rain 113 lbs N/ac Feb-Jul
37B Com for sila e 216 lbs N/ac Feb-July
or hum for rain 113 lbs N ac April-July
37B Sorghum silaae 216 1bs-N/ac April-July
37B Soybeans 140 /ac Aril- e t
37B Sory-hum-Sudanyrass for hay 150 lbs N/ac Aril-Au ust
ass for hay 150 1 Aril-Au test
Fescue for hay 150 lbs Au ust- ul
37B Orchard rass for hay 150 lbs N/ac Axiaust-July
37B Small ain for hay 120 lbs /ac Aua-Anril
37B Ryc2rass for hay 150 lbs ac Feb-Ma
37B SudanQrass for vazimz 113 lbs N/ac Amil-August
37B Fescue for razin 7 113 lbs N/ac August-July
37B Orchar&arass for uazinz 113 lbs N/ac Au�ust-Julv
37B Small 2rain for LJrazin 901bs N/ac a-
37B R eti,rass for Qrazin 113 1 Feb-May
37B Matua for hay 150 lbs 1 August-July
37B Matua for 2razine 113 lb Auau t- ul
SOIL TYPE 20B Georaeville silt loam 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
Oats for Grain 104 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
Wheat for arain132 lbs N/ac Aua-A ril
20B Barley for arain 88 lbs N/ac Au¢-A ril
20B Rye for rain . 132 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
20B Corn for grain 119 lbs ac Feb-July
20B Corn for silage 228 lbs Feb-Jul
20B Sorghum for grain 150 lbs N/ac Aril-Jul
20B Sor hum silage 228 lbs N/ac Aril-Jul
20B Soybeans 140 lbs N/ac Aril- e
20B Sorghum Sudan rass for hay 180 lbs N/ac April-August
20B Sudawass for hay 180 lbs N/ac Aril-Au ust
20B Fescue for hay 180 lbs N/ac August-July
20B Orchard rass for hay 180 lbs N/ac Auvaust-July
mall Grain for hav 120 lbs a 2-Anril
20B Ryearass for ha Feb-May
20B n azin 135 lbs N/ac Avril-August
20B F - 1351 s N/ac Au ust- ul
20B Orchardszrass for arazira 135 lbs N/ac Au ust-Jul
20B Small grain for grazing / c Aug-April
2 ea-ass for graziniz 135 l Feb-May
20B Matua for hav 180 lbs N/ac August-July
20B Matua for arazin2 135 lbs N/ac Au ust-Jul
SOIL TYPE 20112 Georaeville silty claN loam 2 to 6 %.slopes APPL. DATE
20132 Oats for Grain 88 lbs N/ac I Au -A ril
20B2 Wheat for Grain 1121bs N/ac Au -A ril
9

20B2 Barlev for grain 75 l /ac Aug-April
20B2 Rye for uain 112 Ibs N/ac Au -A ril
20B2 Com for grain 101 lbs c Feb-Jul
20B2 Com for sila a 1941b N/ac Feb-Jul
20B2 or hum for 2rain 127 Ibs N/ac Aril- 1
20B2 Sorehum silne 194 Ibs N/ac A nl-
20B2 Soybeans 119 1 s /a t
_20B2 um Sudan-vrass for hay 153 lb Ariril-August
20B2 Sudangrass forhay 153Aril-Au ust
_20132 -Fescue for hay 1 Au ust- ul
_20132 Ordard-sirass for hay 153 1 ust-Jul
20B2 Small Grain for hay 102 lbs A v-A ril
20B2 Ryegrass for hay 153 1 Feb-May
20B2 ur or r zi 115 lbs /ac A vril- t
20B2 --Fescue for azin 115 lbs N/ac A - ul
20B2 Orchardyrass for �_,:-azin= 11 ac Au ust- ul
20B2 Small rain for 2razina Aug-Aoril
O132 R e ass for 2razing 115 1 /ac
20132 1 Matua for hay 1 153 lbs N/ac I kU9u -
20B2 razin� 115 lbs N/ac Au-au-July
SOIL TYPE 20C Geor eville silt loam 6 to 10 % slo es APPL. DATE
2 for erain c Zpa-April
20C Wheat for grain /ac Aut�-April
20Barley for zrain c Au -A
-20C Rye for Parain 1 Aug-Anril
20C COMfor erain 109 Ibs N/ac
orn for silauQ 2 10 1 s N/ac
20C Sorp-huf rain 1381bs N/ac Mril-July
20C Sorp-humsila 210 Ibs N ac Aril-Jul
20C Soybeans 12 1-Se t
-20C Sorgahm Sudany-ra166 Ibs N/ac April-Auaust
Sudantarass for hay 1 April-August
20C Fescue for hay 1661bs /ac A - ul
-20C Orchardgrass661bs N/ac Au ust- ul
-20C IqMqll CTrain for hay 1101bs u -A ril
20 hay 1 61bs Mac Feb-May
anu for r zini, 1241bs N/ac Aril- u ust
-20C Fescue for uazinQ 12 Au ust- ul
20C Orcharduass for -,razin Au ust- ul
20C Small rain for grazing 82 Ibs -,-Ar)ril
-20C RveRTass for erazing 124 Ibs N/ac Feb-Ma
Matua for hay 166lbs ac Au ust- ulv_
20C Matua for rr zin,} 1241 s N/ac Au2ust- ul
SOIL TYPE 23132 Geor eville silty clan loam 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
23B2 Oats for 2rain 88 lbs -A 1
2 heat for in 1121bs N/ac - 'l
2 -Barley r 75 lbs N/ac -A ril
2 B2 Rye fr rin 1121 u -A ril
23132 orn for zrain 101 Ibs Mac flb-July
23B2 Com for it 41bs N/ac
10

23B2 Sorahum for vrain 122 lbs N/ac Aril-Jul
23132 Sorghum silage 194 lbs N/ac Aril-Jul
23B2 Soybeans 119 lbs N/ac Aril-Se t
23B2 Sor hum-Sudan rass for hav 153 1 lac Aril-August
23B2 Sudangrass for hay 1531bs Mac Aril-Aueust
23B2 Fescue for hay 1531bs N/ac August-July
23B2 Orc and rass for hay 153 1bs N/ac August-July
23132 Small Grain for hav 1021bs N/ac A -A ril
23132 R e ass for hay 153 lbs N/ac Feb-May
23B2 Sudan ass for P-razing 1151bs N/ac A it-Au t
23B2 Fescue for arazing 1151b /ac Au, s -hu1
23B2 Orchard ass for zrazing 115 lbs ac Au t- ul
23B2 Small grain for grazine 77 lb /ac Au -A ril
23B2 Rvegrass for erazing115 lbs N/ac Feb-Ma
23B2 Matua for 153 lbs N/ac Au ust- ul
23B2 Matua for azina 115 Ibs N ac Au ust-Jul
SOIL TYPE 232B Geor eville silt loam,2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
232B Oats for zrain Au -A ril
23213 Wheat for a rain 120 1 s /ac Au -A ril
232B Barley for�aain 801bs ac Au -A ril
232B R ve for rain 120 lbs N/ac Au -A�ril
232B Com for gain 113.1bs N/ac Feb-Jul
232B Com for Silau 2161bs N/ac Feb-July
232B Sor hum for grain 113 lbs N/ac Aril-Jul
232B Sor hum silage 21 lbs ac Aril-Jul
232B gorahum Sudan ass for hay 175 lbs N/ac April-August
232B Soybeans 1201 s /ac Avril-Sevt
232B udan(=rass for hay 1751bs N/ac Arwil-Au-gust
232B Fescue for 175 lbs N/ac A ust- ul
232B Orchard-arass for hay 175 1bs N/ac A ust- ul
232B Small s.,r in for hay 1201bs N/ac Au -A ril
232B Rveourass for hay 175 lbs N/ac Feb-May Sudanerass for zrazina 131 lbs N/ac Aril- u ust
232B Fescue for grazing 131 1 s /ac Au u - ul
232B Orchardgxass for °-razin 131 lbs N/acAugust-July
232B mall Ur in for grazing 901bs N/acAug-April
232B R e rass for vrazinu 131 lbs N/ac Feb-May
232B Matua for hay 1751bs N/ac Au st-Jul
232B Matua for--razin 131 lbs N/ac _ Auaust-Jul
SOIL TYPE 232C Geor eville silt loam 6 to 10 6 slopes APPL. DATE
232C ats for uain 85 lbs N/ac -Zu-ia-Anril
232C Wheat for zrain — 110 Ibs N/ac A -A ril
232C Barley for erain 741bs ac AuL--A ril
232C Rye f gain 1101bs N/ac Aua-A ril
232C Com for grain 104 lbs N/ac Feb-Jul
232C Coin for ila e 1991bs N/ac Feb-Jul
232C Sorahum for grain 1041bs N/ac Aril-Jul
932C Sorghum silaize 199 Ibs N/ac Aril-Jul
232C Soybeans 11 1 ac A vril-Se t
1232C Sor hum Sudanuass for hay 161 lbs N/ac Avril-August
232C I Sudan rass for hay 161 lbs N/ac Aril-Au u t
11

232C Fescue for hay 161 lbs N/ac Au ust- ul
232C Orchardy-Tass for hay 161 lbs N/ac Au ust-J
232C Small erain for hay 110 lbs /ac Au -A ril
232C Rycerass for hay 161 lb / c Feb-Ma
2 2 anL-r c ust
Fescue for arazing 11 Aup-ust-July
232C Orcharderassz' 121 lbs c Au - ul
crrain for erazing821bs /ac Au -A ril
grazing21 Feb-May
232I M tua for hay 161 lbs c Au ust- ul
232C I Matua f g, _ 121 lbs N/ac Au ust-Jul
SOIL TYPE 232D Geor eville silt loam 10 to 15 % slo es APPL. DATE
232D Oats for main Au-v--April
2 2Wheat f r grain 110 1
232D Barely r arain 74 lbs N/ c Au -A ril
232D Rye for PTain 110 lbs N/ac Aug--April
232D Com for grain 104 lbs N/ac Feb-July
232D Com for sil 199 lbs N/ar, Feb-July
_232 um for !rain 104 lbs N/ac Aril-Jul
232D Sory-hum fox silage 199 lbs N/ac Aril- ul
232D Soybeans 110 lbs N/ac Aril-Se
232D Sorzlluni Sudawuass hav 161 lbs N/ac —Auril-Aumst
232D Sudangrass for hay 161 lbs N/ac At)ril-Auv-ust
232D Fescue for hay 161 1
232D Orchar&rass for ha c A
232D Small grain for ha 110 lbs N/ac A -A ril
T12D Rvegrass for hay 161 lbsFeb-May
TIN) Sudanuass for razi 7 121 lbs N/ac Aril-August
232D Fescue for araziny121 lbs N/ac Aug-ust-Julv
232D Orchardgrass for erazing 121 lbs N/ac Au ust- ul
232D Small uain or grazing, 82 1 -A ril
32D R e rass for grazing 121 lbs /ac Feb-May
232D Matua for hay 161 lbs N/ac August-July
232D Matua for in 121 1 t-Jul
SOIL TYPE 232B2 Geo eville silty clay+ loam 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
_232B2 Oats for arain 78 1 - ril
232B2 Wheat for szrain 102 lbs /ac Au--A ril
2 Barley for grain68 lbs ac Au -A ril
2 2 2 Rye for gr ' -A ril
232B2 Com for urain 104 lbs N/ac Feb-July
232B2 Com for silau Feb-July
232B2 or hum for rain 96 1
232B2 Sor hum silage 199 1 April-July
232B2 Soybeans 1 21
232B2 or hum- udan ass for hay 149 lbs /ac Anfil-AuMiSt
232B2 Sudanuass for hay 149 lbs /ac Aril-Au ust
232B2 Fescue for hay 149
_232B2 Orcharduass for hay 149 1 A
_232B2 Small Grain for hay 102 lbs N/ac Aug-April
232B2 RyeaTass for hay 149 lbs ac Feb-May
1232B2 Sudanrass for mrazim?_ N ac Aril-Au a st
12

232B2
2 2B2 Fescue for razin
232B2 Sm all rdara for razin 112 Ibs Nja
2 e r s azi 1 /ac ust- 1
2 2 2 117a ua o razin 771b a uust-
u
M tua fo razi 12 N/ac
SOI - I
4 s
23L TYPE 232C2 1 s N/ac u ust-Ju
2C2 Geor eville silty clan loa
2 2 2 t for rai m 6 to 10 % slo s - u1
232 2 Bar e t f r°r in 7 eS 3 b / c APPL, DATE
232 2 Ref ain 6 b 1V A _
32 2 Co f r ran 641 s Iv c Au -A
n 1
232 2 ° for s'la e 61 s N/a
2 2 2 or hu Ibs /a u _
2C2 hu r r l 3Ib /ac eb- u1 l
2 C2 orbea s-Sud is ana e 9p bs vac Feb-Jul
2 2 0 ' s °r ha Ibs N/ac III-Jul
I Olbs '� "Jul
2C2 danrJrass for N/ rll-J
232C e cue for h lbs N'a l-Aunus
232 rchardrJrass for h 1401b s N/a riI- e
2 2 2 al i for h /ac 'I-
140 Au
2 2 e ass for 1 /ac u ust- ul ust
2 2 2 d ra s f r 61bs ac Au st-Jul
32C2 Fes u f r in 14 lb / u
r - ril
232C2 O c and razin 1 .5
232 2 m I ass for r n 1 5 Ib i1-
/ac
2 2 R e rasrai f r razin I S lb u ust- +�st
for i /ac 1
32 2 ua 2 bs /ac u ust- I
Matua f r zi 14 •I
SOIL T r ra n 10 i s ac F3 --A
"llPE 232D2 El 1 b ac Au a
2 2' - ats oo11 r r ville silty m st- 1
ain cla loa 10 to ° Au Ust- 1
232 2 e t o in 7 I ss a slo es APpL.D
2 2D2 Barle fo ATE
23 D2 R e for rain in 61 s / c Au -A ril
32D2 for a• 64 IS N/ac Au - I.Pril
23 D2 o hfor ila e 61 s N/ c Au .A ril
232D2 ora u m ° ain 7 l fb /a Fe - u1 nl
232D or u ° s Ia e 90 bs
2 2 o be s d ass f r h 7 Ibs N/a Aril- u
2 2D2 udan rass 4
32D 2 Fr c e# r a a 140 lb s /ac A riI_Au u t
232 m 1 ra' s f r h V 14 lb /ac nI' ust
2 2D2 ss to oa a 96 Ibs /ac uI
232 2 F s a ' fo r in 4 bs /ac An +st-Ju
2 ue r N/ -A •I
2 2 cha d sor for 1051bs /ac eb-M
2 2 11
ain f ra I s N/ac -Au
t-
2D2 e a a l 105 s I NIP u
t a fo a r Z'n 105 I12 bs t
ust_ u I
01b N/ac
Au us -tut

51bs a
Au s _ ul DATE
a or ra i °
AppT,.
�! 2D lex 2 to 6 0/1 slo es _
Hanford-Badin com
`.SOIL TYPE 131B r I -
1 1
1 r • c -
r c -
o - s
131 0 r 1 -
B r si ra ot-
a lbs
13 0r -
13 p 1
1 escue for haV r l 201bs ac Feb Ma
31� rchard Trass 00 lbs �
ril-Au t
1 1B arai f0 a uUuSt-
1 mall a 15�5
e crass for hav 1 azin 5 k a uUust u
3 I3 udan°rass fO n
s e in r 50b 1 b-
1
13 1 c -
r r lb c A TE
at r Appi„D
3 o/a slo es
3 lex 6 to
131C 10 u°=
Hanford-Badin com
SOIL TYPE r
t o
1 f °
-
1 r 4
1 o c 1'
41 � t-
3 4 U -
3 r -
3 1 ra r v l t
3 or b c u° "
1 ra
O 7 r f -
a 3 c u v
-
3 v r s r s DATE
Appi,.
a % slo es W7
lx
SOIL TYPE
com e 2 to 6 j
522A Cid-Li num �8
is for rain
22
14

522A Wheat for grain 96 lbs N/ac Aug-April
522A Barley for ain 721bs N/ac Au -A ril
522A Rye for ain 96 lbs N/ac Aug-April
522A Corn for arain 113 lbs N/ac Feb-Jul
522A Com for silage 192 lbs N/ac Feb-J 1
522A Sorzhum for grain 113 lbs N/ac Aril-Ju
2A S r hum r sila e 1 s N/ac ADril-Ju
22A or hum- udan a for hay 150 lbs N/ac Anril-August
522A Soybeans 1401bs N/ c ril- e
22A Sud n uass for hay 150 lbs N/ac ril-Au ust
522A Fescue for hay 150 lbs N/ac Au ust- ul
2A Orcharduass for ha 0 lbs /ac Au st-Jul
2A Small a'n for ha 12 lbs N/ac Aup--Auril
522A Rvegrass for hay 150 lbs N/ac Feb-May
522A Sudangras .for zrazing 113 lbs N/ac Aril-A test
522A Fescue fo r razing 113 lbs N/ac Au u t- ul
522A rchar t=E ss for r in 113 lbs N/ac Au ust- 1
522A mall grain for Parazim 90 Is N/ac Aug--April
22A R egrass for nra ' 113 lbs N/ac Feb-Ma
522A Matua for ay 150 lbs N/ac August-July
522A Matua for ui-azing 113 lbs N/ac August- ul
SOIL TYPE 41B Callison-Li num complex 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
41B Oats for =rain 78 lbs N/ac —Aug-April
41B Wheat for rain 96 lbs N/ac A -A ril
41B Barl y for yrain 721b N/ac A -A ril
41B Rye f r rain 96 lbs N/ac A -A ril
41B Com for rain 1131 s N/ac Feb-July
41B rn for sila e 1921 s N/ac Feb-July
41 B S r hum for mrain 113 lb s N/ac A ril-Jul
41B r hum f r sila e 192 s N/ac A nil-Jul
41B Sor hum-Sudangrass for hay 150 lbs N/ac -Anril-August
41B So eans 1401 /ac April-Sent
41B Sudan rass fo 1501bs ac aril-Au us
41B Fescue for hay 150 lbs N/ c Au t- ul
B rchard rass for hay-- 150 lbs N/ac August- ul
B Small in for h 1201bs c Au -A ril
41B Rye2rass for h 150 lbs c Feb-Ma
41B Sudanizrass f r grazing 1131 s Mac Aril-Au ust
UFesc e for razin 1131bs N/ac Au ust-Julrchard ass for azi v113 lbs N/ac Au ust-JulSmall ain for razin 90 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
R e rass for razin 113 lb N/ac F - aatua for ha 0 lbs /ac A t- ulM_atua fo azin 1 lbs ac Au us - ul
SOIL TYPE 49B Nanford-Badin com ilex 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
49B 0as for ain 91 lbs N/ c Au -A ril
4 B ea for rain 108lbs c Aug-A ril
49B Barlev for grnin 721b ac Aup-Al2ril
49B R e for ain 108 lbs N/ac Au -A ri
49B Corn for grain 113 lbs N/a Feb-Jul
49B I Cnrn for silage 2161bs Mac Feb- ul
15

4 B Sorghum for nain 113 1 N/ac Aril-Jul
49B or hum for sil e 216 lbs N/ac ril-Jul
49B Soybeans 1201bs N/a April-Sept
49B Sor hum- dan ass for hay 200 lbs N/ac Aril-A ust
-49B a or hay 200 lbs April-August
Fescue for hay 20 N/ac Aumt-july
49B Orchardumsr hay 200 lbs N/ac Au ist-July
49B Small urain f ha 201 N/a -A 1
Ryegrass for hay eb-May
49B Sudanzra5s fQr grazing150 lbs N/ac Anril-August
49B -Fescue for grazing 150 Ihq hLac August-July
49B Orchardgrass for =razin '50 lb c A lust- ul
49B Small strain for razing 90 lb /ac -A ril
49B 150 lbs N/ac Fe -May
49B Mat for hay 2001 /ac -Au2ust-July
49B Matua for arazing 1 501 N/a ust- ul
SOIL TYPE 49B2Nanford-Badin complex 2 to 6 % complex APPL. DATE
4 2 Oats for zi-ain 7 N/a Au -A i
49B2 Wheat for Urain 921 u - ril
49B2 arlev forrain 1 lbs N/a Au -A aril
49B2 Ref rain 2 lbs / c -A ril
4982 Corn for r ' 96 ibs N/ac Feb-July
4 2 for i 1 lbs Feb-July
49B2 = um f rain 96 lb Ari - ul
2 r um sila e 1 41 s A 1- ul
4 2 Soybeans 1 lbs N/a Ari - t
49B2 Sor m-Su n ra3s for hay 1701ADril-Au2ust
49B2 udan ras f a 17 s N/a Ari - u ust
_49B2 Fes for ha 17 /ac uau -
49B2 r r rass for hay 170 lbs / —August-Julv
49B2 Small grabifor hay 102 lbs N Au-Aoril
49 2 e eras for hay 170 lbs c Feb-May
49B2 --Sudangrass f r grazing 1271bs /ac Anril-Aueust
49B2 Fescue or eraziwz 1271 N/ac ugust-jul
49B2 Orch rass f r razi 7 l N/a ust- 1
49B2 all ain -for fzrazing- 76 1 /ac -A 1
9B2 __Ryegrass for erazing271 c b-Ma
2 Matua-fQr hay 170 1bs c A
49B2 Matua for 9 razing 1 71bs c Au stily
-
SOIL TYPE 522B Cid-Li num complex 2 to 6 % sloees APPL. DATE
22B Oats or train
78 s u - ril
522B heat rain bAug-April
22B Barle or arain 72 lbs ac Au2-April
522B for grain sAug-April
2B for in 11 s N/ b-
522B for sil e 192 /ac -Feb-July
22B or h or grain 1 3 lbs / c -Jul
22B hum for silage1 21b ac A l-Jul
22B r hu dancer -`Lhay 150 lbs - ueu
st
2B Soybeans 14 N/ac A ril-
22B -Sudanerass for hay 150 lbs N/a ril-August
16

522B Fescue for ha 1501bs N/ac Au ust-Jul
522B Orchard ass for ha 150 lbs N/ac August-Jul
522B mall ain fnr'hP'N 120 lbs N/ac . Au -A ril
522B R e ass for ha 150 lbs N/ac Feb-Mau
522 uda ass for *razing 1 lbs ac Aril-Au gist
522B esc for razing 1131bs /ac Au st-Jul
522B rch rd r ss or rani 113 lbs /ac Au-u t-Jul
22B mall a' f r r zing 0 s N/ac Au -A ril
5 2B R U L 11 s f r zi 113 lbs N ac Feb-Ma
5223 Ma a for ha 1 0 lb N/ac A ust- ul
522 atua f r azin 113 lbs N/ac Au 7 st- u1
SOIL TYPE 525B Cid-Li num complex 2 to 60 slopes APPL. DATE
52 B Oats fora' 8 N/a A -A ril
5 5B Wheat for rain 961 / A -A ril
525B B le for =rai 21b N/a A -A ril
25B R e for ain 61 s N/a -A ril
525E -L.-OM-for drain 11 lbs c F b-Jul
25B Corn for sila-e 192 lbs N/ac Feb-July
525B So Uhum for, rain 1131bs N/ c A ril- 1
525B SorQhum silage 1921 N/ c A '1-Ju
5 or"hum- ud n-ra s f ha 15 lbs lac A ril-Au ust
525B o'be s 1401bs lac t
Aril- e
25B d ass or a 150 s N ac Aril-Au t
525B Fesc fnr'hsv 150 lbs N ac Au ust-Jul
25B rchard r s for—hav 150 s N/ac Au ust-Jul
25B mall a' for ha 120 11,v /ac -A 1
25B R e rass or ha 1 lbs ac F b-Ma
525B n ud r s for azin 113 lbs ac uu-AJui list
25 Fescue for ra in
25B O chardarass r crazin 11 lbs Vlnr. u0u t-Jul
525B Small rain for razing 901bs N/a or_ ril
525B Rye rass for razing 1131 s N/ c Fe -M
525B Mat a for ha 150 lb N/a A Ucist-Jul
525B __ Mat a for azinV-_ 1 lb N/a Au ust- 1
SOIL TYPE 526B Cid-Li num com}lex 2 to 6 % slo es APPL. DATE
52 B —Oats brgrai 78lbs lac Au -A ril
52 B Wheat for ff ain _ 96 lb N/ac Au -A ril
52 Rarley for rain 72lbs /ac Au -A ril
52 B R e for arain 96 lb lac Au -A ril
526B rn r rai 113 lbs N/ac Fe - ul
526B C rn f r sila a 19 s /a eb- ul
526B So r hu for rain 13 s /a A ril- ul
526B or hum fo ila Je 1 2 N/ac A ril- ul
52 B or hum-Sudan as fo a 150 s N/ac Aril-Au ust
526B o eans 1A 0 lbs N/ c AI A Sent
26B ud nra s for ha 1 0 lb N/ac Aril-A u
526B Fescue r ha 0 lbs / c August-July-
526B Or char uass for ha 150 lbs--lac Au u t-J
526B a rain for ha 120 lbs /a All -A 31ri
5 6B R e sc fn-rhnv 150 lbs N/ac Feb-Ma
526B Sudanuass for,,2razi 113 Ilbs N/ac Aril-A ust
17

F
Fescu for ra in 11 lbs /ac Au ust- ulrchard rass for razin 113 lb N/ac u u t- ulSmal rain or r zi lbs ac Au -A ril
R e ras for razin 11 1 sNac Feb-MaMat a for hav 501 s /ac Au
u - u
52 B tua ly
11 3 lbs c Auaust-July
SOIL TYPE 522C Cid silt loam 6 to 10 % slopes APPL. DATE
522 s f ra' 2 s ril
2 hea r ain 8 s c ue-Anri
2 B le - for rain 661 s /ac uu- ril
2 Re 1 s c u -A
2 Corn in 1 4 b e - ul
52 si 7 lb /a b_
522C Sorghumfor Prain 1 lbs ac ril- ul
522C Sonahurnsilaize 17 s /a ri - ul
522C qnrvhiirf]-Q.-- an s f r h 3 Is Nlac, ri - u ust
52 b s 1 lb N/ac —Aj)ril-Sept
522C Sildan2rass for hay 13 N/ac A il-August
Fescue for ha • 38 I6 A -gust-July
52 Orchardor ss r hay 138 s N/ac A Dust-Jul
522 Small ar in for bay 101 /a Au,(T- jri
522 R e Jr for lb_N ac b-11 Aa
5 an r s f r zin 10 s /a A -Au u t
522 Fe e f r zin 03 bs ac u u -Ju
2 rchar 'ass rani 0 bs c u t_
july
22 m lirr ' for r 'n 82 1 /ac Aue-April
22C R e r ss r azi 3 lbs ac Feb--Uay
2 atua for bay 13 bs c 2u _
July
522C Mitmlkar zin 10 Is /a Au st- 1
SOIL TYPE 525C Cid silt loam 6 to 10 % slopes APPL. DATE
is f r ai 72 ac u¢- ri
52 hat or r in 8 b ac u - ri
52 ale r r i b
25C Ryefor in 88 1 / c Aua- ril
t25 0 or rai 4lbs c F b- 1 orn for '1aa 7 s F -Jul or um f ain 041 c A 1- ul So u it e 7 s ac ril- lv
r Jh m- n ras or h 1 lbs ac ril-Au u t
SovbQans 12 lbs N/ - e t
525C Sudanivassfor hay 1 lbs N/ A -August
25C Fescue for 8 1bs N/ac u ust- ul
_525C Orchardar t s ha 1 lb / u ust-luly
C 11 rai or 1 lb /ac ug-Avril
525C Rye2rassfor s Feb-May
-525C u Qra or n 1 / I-AuQust
es for-g-i-azinia 1 lb NZac u st-
july
2 Orchudera a 'n 10 1 /ac u -Ju
25 m ai or r 8 bs c — Pril
525 RyQmrass r zin 1 bs N/a b- a
25 at o f ay 138 1bs N/ac Auaust-Julv
18

525C I Matua for razing 1 103 lbs N/ac August-July
SOIL TYPE 68B-C Goldston-Badin complex 2-15 % slopes APPL. DATE
68B-C Oats for -rain 68 lbs N/ac Aug-April
68B-C Wheat for grain 84 lbs N/ac Au - 1
68B-C Barley for grain 72 lbs ac A - ril
68B-C Rye for grain A -A) '1
68B-C Com for rain 88 lbs Feb-July
68B-C Corn for silne 168 lbs N/ac Feb-Jul
68B-C Sor hum for erain 88 lbs N/ac Aril- 1
68B-C Sor hum silage 1681 lac Aril- ul
68B-C Sor hum-Sudan rass for hav 150 lbs N/ac Aril-Au ust
68B-C So beans 801bs N/ac Aril- e t
68B-C Sudaniarass for hay 150 lbs N/ac Aril-Au ust
68B-C Fescue for hay 150 lbs N/ac Au EIs -JUIV
68B-C Orchardo-Tass for hay 150 lbs N/ac August-July
68B-C Small uain for hay 1201bs N/ac Au -A ri
68B-C Rvearass for hay 150 lbs N/ac Feb-May
°J r ri -Au ust
Fescue for-iarazing 113 lbs N/ac August-Jul
68B-C Orchardarass for ¢nazi 113 lbs N/ac Aurust-Jul
68B-C Small---rain for ar zip 901bs N/ac AuvJ-Avril
6 B- Rve-,--irass f r irazin 113 lbs N/ac Feb-Ma
68B-C Matua for hay 150 lbs N/ac Au us - ul
68B-C Matua for g-razing 1131 s N/ac August-Jul
SOIL TYPE 6_8D Goldston-Badin complex 10-15 % slopes APPL. DATE
68D Oats for rain 63 lbs Au-z-Avril
8D Wheat or yrain 77 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
Barlev for vrain 66 Is N/ac Aug--April
8D Rye for erain 77 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
68D Com for grain 81 lbs N/ac Feb- u1
68D Com for sila e 155 lbs N/ac Feb-July
68D Sor hum arain 81 Is N/ac Aril- ul
68D Sorb-gum sila e 155 lbs N/ac Aril-Jul
68D Sorohum-Sudanyrass hay 138 lbs N/ac A ril-August
68D Soybeans 74 lbs N/ac Aril- e t
68D Sudanvvass for hay 138 lbs N/ac Avril-Aupaust
68D Fescue hav 138 lbs N/ac Au ust-Jul
68D Orehardgrass hay 138 lbs N/ac August-Jul
68D Small arain hay 110 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
68D R yezrass hav 138 lbs N/ac Feb-Ma
Sudantzrass for grazing 104 lbs N/ac April-Auctust
68D Fescue for razin 1041bs N/ac Au st- ul
68D Orchard ass for uazinu 1041bs N/ac August-July
68D Small rain for grazing 82 lbs N/ac Au -A ril
8D R e rass for 9-razint, 104 lbs NYac Feb-May D Matua for hay 1 3 8 lbs Nlac August7JUIY-
68D Matua for izraziniz 104 lbs N/ac Au s - ul
19

NOTE: THESE ARE THE RECOMMENDED REALISTIC YIELD NITROGEN
APPLICATION RATES FOR THE SOIL TYPES LISTED ON THE PRECEEDING
PAGES. WHEN A CROP IS PLANTED THAT VARIES FROM THE WASTE
MANAGEMENT PLAN, THE NITROGEN APPLICATION RATES FROM ABOVE
MUST BE USED IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH .0200 REGULATIONS. IF
HAYLAND IS USED FOR GRAZING, THE HAYLAND APPLICATION RATE
MUST BE REDUCED BY 25 PERCENT. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE
CALL OUR OFFICE, THE PHONE NUMBER IS 545-8353, OR 542-2244 EXT 3.
20

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHO ERS
DwQ t9 571 — `lop
EMERGENCY MANAGEME S STEM S� —o�9t!
SWCD 644
NRCS —
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or
leave your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to
ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for
all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
1. Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation,-this may or may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow-possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B: Runoff from waste application field-actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s)that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C: Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to-restarting pumps.
D: Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators-action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
1 December 18, 1996

e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E: Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
flowing leaks-possible,action:,
a. Dig'a small-Sump.or itch away from the embankment to catch all seepage,
put in a submersible pump, and Vamp-back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused�by•burrowing animals,trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what&ration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills,or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger(either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3: Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality)
regional office; Phone - - After hours,emergency number: 919-733-3942.
Your phone call should include: your name, facility,telephone number,the details
of the incident from item 2 above, the exact location of the facility,the location or
direction of movement of the spill,weather and wind conditions. The corrective
measures that have been under taken,and the seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS-Phone number -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES,phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number
and local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -
4: If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your
problem to them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5: Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off-site
damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address:
c. Contractors Phone:
--
2 December 18, 1996

i I
6: Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting
Engincer,etc.)
a. Name. S
b. Phone:
7: Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.
v
3 December 18, 1996

Dairy Farm Waste Management Odom' Control Checklist
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead • Dairy production Pf Vegetative.or wooded buffers
:�Zcommended best management practices
od judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn alley • Wet manure-covered surfaces V'Promote
crape or flush daily
surfaces drying with proper ventilation
0 Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants,pipes,stock tanks
Bedded areas • Urine r Promote drying•with proper ventilation
• Partial microbial decomposition Replace wet or manure-covered bedding
Manure dry stacks • Partial microbial decomposition Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
Storage tank-or.basin • Partial microbial decomposition; O Bottom or mid-level loading
surface • Mixing while filling; . O Tank covers
• Agitation when emptying O�/Basin surface mats of solids;
D Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
13�'Agitate only prior to manure removal
O Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surfaces • Partial microbial decomposition. Q Liquid drainage from settled solids
• Mixing while filling O Remove solids regularly
• Agitation when emptying
Manure,slurry or sludge • Agitation when spreading 13 oil injection of slur/sludges
spreader outlets • Volatile gas emissions .Wash residual manure from spreader after use
WH Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure, • Volatile gas emissions while O Soil injection of slurry/sludges
slurry or sludge on field drying OVoil incorporation within 48 hrs
surfaces E Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
O_Proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks • Agitation of recycled lagoon O Flush tank covers;
liquid while tanks are filling O Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti-siphon vents
Outside drain collection • Agitation during wastewater O Box covers
or junction boxes conveyance
AMOC-November 11, 1996, Page I

Insect Control Checklist for Animal Operations
Source Cause BWs to Control Insects Site Specific Practices
z- Liquid Systems
Flush Gutters • Accumulation of solids Flush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated solids from
utters as designed.
W Remove bridging of accumulated solids at
ischarge
Lagoons and Pits • Crusted Solids Maintain lagoons,settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to minimize the
crusting of solids to a depth of no more than 6-
inches over more than 30%of surface.
Excessive Vegetative • Decaying vegetation Mr Maintain vegetative control along banks of �^
Growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along watees edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Dry Systems _
Feeders • Feed Spillage Design,operate and maintain feed systems(e.g., T�
bunkers and troughs)to minimize the
ccumulation of decaying wastage.
Clean up spillage on a routine basis(e.g.,7- 10
day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter).
Feed Storage • Accumulations of feed residues M Reduce moisture accumulation within and
around immediate perimeter of feed storage
areas by insuring drainage away from site
and/or providing adequate containment(e.g.,
covered bin for brewer's grain and similar high
moisture grain products).
Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as
needed.
At. -November 11, 1996, Page 1

Source Cause BMPs to Control Insects. Site Specific Practices
Animal Holding Areas Accumulations of animal-wastes r9r Eliminate low areas that trap moisture along
and feed wastage fences and other locations where waste
accumulates and disturbance by animals is
minimal.
Maintain fence rows and filter strips around
animal holding areas to minimize
accumulations of wastes(i.e.,inspect for and
remove or break up accumulated solids as
needed).
Dry Manure Handling • Accumulations of animal wastes f1' Remove spillage on a routine basis(e.g.,7- 10
Systems day interval during summer; 15-30 day interval
during winter)where manure is loaded for land
Wapplication or disposal.
Provide for adequate drainage around manure
/stockpiles.
I7 Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and
manure handling areas as needed.
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service,Department of Entomology,Box 7613,North Carolina State University,
Raleigh,NC,27695-7613.
f
AM1C-November 11, 1996, Page 2

Version—November 26,2018
Mortality Management Methods
Indicate which method(s) will be implemented.
When selecting multiple methods indicate a primary versus secondary option.
Methods other than those listed must be approved by the State Veterinarian.
Primary Secondary Routine Mortality
a Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours of knowledge of animal
death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body of water
(G.S.106-403). The bottom of the burial pit should beat least one foot above the seasonal
high water table. Attach burial location map and plan.
n Landfill at municipal solid waste facility permitted by NC DEQ under GS 15A NCAC
L1 13B .0200.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
Complete incineration according to 02 NCAC 52C .0102.
❑ A composting system approved and permitted by the NC Department of Agriculture&Con-
sumer Services Veterinary Division (attach copy of permit). If compost is distributed off-farm,
additional requirements must be met and a permit is required from NC DEQ.
a In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved by the
NC Department of Agriculture &Consumer Services (G.S. 106-549.70).
a Any method which, in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian, would make possible
the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or animal health.
(Written approval by the State Veterinarian must be attached).
Mass Mortality Plan
Mass mortality plans are required for farms covered by an NPDES permit. These plans are
also recommended for all animal operations. This plan outlines farm-specific mortality man-
agement methods to be used for mass mortality. The NCDA&CS Veterinary Division sup-
ports a variety of emergency mortality disposal options; contact the Division for guidance.
• A catastrophic mortality disposal plan is part of the facility's CAWMP and is activated
when numbers of dead animals exceed normal mortality rates as specified by the State
Veterinarian.
• Burial must be done in accordance with NC General Statutes and NCDA&CS Veterinary
Division regulations and guidance.
• Mass burial sites are subject to additional permit conditions (refer to facility's animal
waste management system permit).
• In the event of imminent threat of a disease emergency, the State Veterinarian may enact
additional temporary procedures or measures for disposal according to G.S. 106-399.4.
r
signature of Farm,Owner/Manager Date
i— 7 f ZZ : l
Signature of Technical Specialist Date

i
Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
❑ Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18, 1996

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone] Re-:ort No: W01453 W
Grower. Crawford,Jerry Copies To:
4085 Crawford Dairy Rd,
Chapel Hill, NC 27516
„ Wste Analysis Rioftrt Farm: 19-20
8/22/05 Chatham County
Sample Info. Laboratory Results arts per million unless otherwise noted)
Sample 1D: N P K _ Ca _M. S Fe Mn Zn Cu B Mo Ci C
1WC1 Total 2284 501 1969 1036 447 202 99.5 15.9 19.1 4.15 1.58
IN-N
Waste Code: -NH4
LSD -NO3 Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li 'H SS C.N DM% CCE% ALE K a!
Description: OR-N 507 7.32
Dairy Li ,Slurry Urea
Recommendations: Nutrients Available for First Crop lbs/1000 allons Other Elements lbs/1000 allons
Application Method N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn CU B Mo Cl Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li
Broadcast 8.2 6.7 15.8 6.1 2.6 1.2 0.41 0.09 0.13 0.03 0.01 4.2
fhe waste contains a large amount of nitrogen. To protect the environment,be careful to apply the waste only at rates needed to meet crop nitrogen requirement.
Sample Info. Laboratory Results arts per million unless otherwise noted
Sample ID: N P K Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn CU B Mo CI C
1WC2 Total 2999 636 2553 1350 569 255 92.2 20.8 24.7 5.49 1.95
IN-N
Waste Code: -NH4
LSD -NO3 Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li PH SS C:N DM% CCE% _AL E(K al
Description: OR-N 649 7.3
Dairy Li .Slurry Urea
Recommendations: Nutrients Available for First Crop lbs/10001;allons Other. Elements lbs/1000 gallons _
Application Method N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn CU B Mo Cl Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li
Broadcast 10.8 8.5 20.4 7.9 3.3 1.5 0.54 0.12 0.16 0.04 0.01 5.4
[he waste product contains large amounts of nitrogen and zinc. Application rates should be based on crop nitrogen requirement unless zinc is accumulating to excess levels in the soil.
fhe waste product contains a large amount of sodium. This element can accumulate in soils where it replaces calcium and contributes to excess soluble salts. Sodium may also damage the foliage of sensitive plants
vhere the waste is a liquid and applied in overhead irrigation systems, Monitor sodium accumulation in the soil where the waste is routinely applied.

YY'
NCIDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 (9i9 733-2655 Report No: 048I8 vv
Grower. Crawford, Jerry Copies To:
4085 Crawford Dairy Rd.
Chapel Hill, NC 27516
is e DYt Farm:
Wste A nal s
y �
1/19/06 Chatham County
Sample Info. Laboratory Results (pa ts r million unless otherwise noted
Sample ID: N P K Ca Mq S Fe Mn Zn Cu B Mo Cl C
1WC1 Total 1428 301 1207 694 251 146 38.5 10.6 11.7 2.31 1.32
IN-N
Waste Code: -NH4 _
LSD -NO3 Na Ni Cd Pb AI Se Li r)H SS C;N DM% CCE% ALE K al
Description: OR-N 289 6.25
Dairy Li[.Slurry Urea
Recommendations: Nutrients Available for First Cr2p. Ibs11000 allons Other Elements. 1bs11000 g2lions
Application Method N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu B Mo Cl Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li
Broadcast 5.1 4.0 9.7 4.1 1.5 0.85 0.22 0.06 0.08 0.02 0.01 2.4
Sample Info. Laboratory Results arts per million unless otherwise noted
Sample ID: N P K Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu B Mo CI C
JWC2 Total 1264 225 901 534 193 98.3 26.1 7.32 7.50 2.68 1.11
1N-N
Waste Code: -NH4
LSD -NO3 Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li pH SS C:N DM% CCE% ALE K al)
Description: OR-IV 225 6.2
Dairy Li .Slu ry Urea
Recommendations: Nutrients Available for First Crop lbs11000gallrons Other Elements lbs11000 allons
Application Method N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu B Mo CI Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li
Broadcast 4.5 3.0 7.2 3.1 1.1 0.57 0.15 0.04 0.05 0.02 0.01 1.9

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Web Site:www.ncagr.com/agronomi/ Report'No 17730
Grower: Crawford,Jerry Copies To:
4085 Crawford Dairy Rd.
Ar Chapel Hill;NC 27516
UASoil Test R V'O ort
Farm: 19-20
1/25/20o6 SERVING N.C.RESIDENTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS Chatham County
Agronomist Comments
A -- 3,$,12
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
1 1st Crop: Corn,Silage 0 180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0_ .0 pH$ 3
2nd Crop: SG/SB-DC 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0 pH$ 3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I KI Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(I)Mn-Al(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS I NO3-N AWN Na
MIN 0.36 1.10 13.7 94.0 0.8 6.7 246 159 61.0 27.0 151 97 90 44_7 447 148 32 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
2 1st Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M 0 120-200 0 •0 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$ 12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/rim,M 0 120-200 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$ 12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(I)Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn AI Cu-1 S-I SS! NO3-N NHS N Na
MIN 0.66 0.79 21.2 96.o 0.9 6.7 123 346 56.0 32.0 327 203 203 689 689 182 42 0.2
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations - - - - - - - -
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime �� P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
3 1st Crop: Corn,Silage 0 180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$ 3
2nd Crop: SG/SB-DC 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0 pH$ 3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI(I)Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.46 1.00 13.5 93.0 o.9 6.5 135 162 60.0 28.0 1193 725 718 391 391 122 26 0.1'
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations -
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
4 1st Crop: Soybeans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
2nd Crop: Corn,Silage 0 180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS-1 NO3-N AWN Na
MIN 0.51 1.04 10.2 87.0 1.3 6.2 116 171 56.0 23.0 1814 1095 1102 200 200 51 26 0.1

11IC1DA&GN,Agrouo:mic ltivi,;iuu P:Iwwone: :1-Z�655 �►Ve:la Si1Ce::Qvw�vai ���r."�o�m"/agru�nonnii/ t�l�ol�ier,: [raataro,Jert-v itepE►rt lvo: 1773U r9 A
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
5 1st Crop: Corn,Silage 0 180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 3
2nd Crop: SG/SB-DC 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-I S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.81 1.03 9.9 87.0 1.3 6.2 268 195 56.0 21.0 735 455 448 316 316 95 29 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
6 1st Crop: Corn,Silage 0 180-220 0 0 0 15-20 0 0 .0 pH$ 3
2nd Crop: SG/SB-DC 0 80-100 0 0 0 15-20 0 0 pH$ 3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS-1 NO3-N AWN Na
MIN 0.56 1.08 9.0 92.0 0.7 6.7 323 144 61.0 24.0 248 155 148 268 268 119 24 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A I Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
7 1st Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M 0 120-200 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$ 12
IJ 2nd Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M 0 120-200 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$ 12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS-I NO3-N AWN Na
MIN 0.66 1.17 9.7 90.0 1.0 6.5 176 139 59.0 23.0 420 261 261 371 371 155 27 0.1

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone] Report No: W06952 W
Grower: Crawford, Jerry Copies To:
4085 Crawford Dairy Rd,
Chapel Hill, NC 27516
0 -WasteAnaiysisRo.rhort Farm:
3/23/06 Chatham County
Sample Info. Laboratory Results (pa ts 3er million unless otherwise noted)
Sample ID: N P K Ca M.9 S _ Fe Mn Zn CU B MO CI C
JWC Total 2216 467 1858 958 393 182 58.7 14.2 14.9 3.50 1.78
1N-N
Waste Code: -NH4
LSD -NO3 Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li H SS C;N DMA CCE% ALE K al
Description: OR-N 427 5.98
Dairy Lig.Slur Urea
Recommendations: Nutrients Available for First Crop Ibs11OOO 211ons Other Elements lbs/1000 gallons
Application Method N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn CU B MO CI Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li
Broadcast 8.0 6.3 14.9 5.6 2.3 11 0.34 0.08 0.10 0.02 0.01 3.6
fhe waste contains a large amount of nitrogen. To protect the environment,be careful to ag4y the waste onl at rates needed to meet crop nitrogen requirement,

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone] Report No: W00444 uv
Grower Crawford, Jerry Copies To:
4085 Crawford Dairy Rd.
Chapel Hill, NC 27516
e
aste nalysis effort Farm: 19-20
11/13/06 Chatham County
Sample Info. Laboratory Results parts per million unless otherwise noted
Sample ID: N P K Ca MR S Fe Mn Zn CU B Mo CI C
1WC1 Total 3125 452 1989 1015 381 200 58.0 14.2 16.3 3.46 1,74
IN-N
Waste Code: -NH4
LSD -NO3 Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li pH SS C:N DM% CCE% ALELg21
Description: OR-N 516 7.14
Dairy Li .Slurry Urea
Recommendations: Nutrients Available for First Crop Ibs17000 allons Other Elements Ibs11000 gallons
Application Method N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn CU B Mo CI Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li
Broadcast 11,2 6.0 15.9 5.9 2.2 1.2 0,34 0.08 0,11 0.02 0.01 4.3
fhe waste contains a large amount of nitrogen. To protect the environment,be careful to apply the waste only at rates needed to meet crop nitrogen requirement.
Sample Info. Laboratory Results arts per million unless otherwise noted
Sample ID: N P K Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn CU B Mo CI C
JWC2 Total 3801 546 2467 1247 469 240 69.8 16.9 19.6 3.68 2.03
IN-N
Waste Code: -NH4
LSD -NO3 Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li pH SS C:N DM% CCE% ALE(K al]
Description: OR-N 637 7.16
Dairy Li .Slur Urea
Recommendations: Nutrients Available for First Crop lbs11000 allons Other Elements Ibs11000_gallons
Application Method N P205 K20 Ca . Mg S Fe Mn Zn CU B Mo Cl Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li
Broadcast 13.6 7.3 19.8 7.3 2.7 1.4 0,41 0.10 0.13 0.02 0.01 5.3
fhe waste contains a large amount of nitrogen. To protect the environment,be careful to apply the waste only at rates needed to meet crop nitrogen requirement.
fhe waste product contains a large amount of sodium. This element can accumulate in soils where it replaces calcium and contributes to excess soluble salts. Sodium may also damage the foliage of sensitive plants
vhere the waste is a liquid and applied in overhead irrigation systems. Monitor sodium accumulation in the soil where the waste is routinely applied.

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division. Phone:[phone] Web Site:www.acagr.com/agronomi/ Report No: 12983
Grower: Crawford,Jerry Copies To: NC AG Statistics
4085 Crawford Dairy Rd.
UA
Chapel Hill,NC 27516
oil T'st Keport
Farm: O1D GRE RD
l2/4/2oo6 SERVING N.C.RESIDENTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS Orange County
Agronomist Comments
C - 12,3
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
THFI 1st Crop: Fes/OG/rim,M 0 120-200 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
2nd Crop: 0
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS-1 NO3-N NHS N Na
MIN 0.56 1.06 15.7 94.0 0.9 6.4 104 165 60.0 29.0 791 486 621 621 183 33 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
THF2 1st Crop: Fes/OG/rim,M .8T 120-200 10-30 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
2nd Crop: 0
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-1 S I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.71 0.98 12.5 93.0 2.1 5.6 52 98 56.0 24.0 473 301 301 301 89 34 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations _
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
THF3 1st Crop: Soybeans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS-I NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.36 1.07 12.4 90.0 1.2 6.1 97 132 59.0 26.0 390 242 242 261 261 83 30 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime N P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
THF4 1st Crop: Fes/OG/rim,M .7T 120-200 0 0 0 0 0 0 •0 0 12
2nd Crop: 0
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-1 S I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN o.86 1.10 9.6 82.0 1.7 5.6 104 172 53.0 20.0 781 486 305 305 168 33 0.1

IVCDA&(.S Agronomic Division 1111hotle:(9119)733•265-4 Vtb Sille:svww•ocagr.ruln.al,lgmononui,' Report:W04948
Grower Crawford,Jerry Copies To:
4085 Crawford Dairy Rd.
Chapel Hill,NC 27516
L
�`• Waste nalysis Report
Farm: 19-20
1/2/2007 Chatham County
Sample Information Laboratory Results(parts per million unless otherwise noted)
Sample ID: N P K Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu B Mo Cl C
JWCI Total 3128 781 2209 1734 679 336 137 26.9 27.2 6.32 2.96
IN-N
Waste Code: -NH4
LSD -NO3 Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li pX SS C.•N DM% CCE% ALE(KO)
Description: OR-N 525 7.15
Dairy Li .Slurry Urea
Recommendations: Nutrients Available for First Crop _ MOON gallons Other Elements Ibs/1000 xallons
Application Metbod N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Ca B Mo Cl No Ni Cd Pb Al Se M
Broadcast 11.2 10.4 17.7 10.1 4.0 2.0 0.80 0.16 0.18 0.04 0.02 4.4
Irrigation 10.4 10.4 17.7 10.1 4.0 2.0 0.80 o.16 0.18 0.04 0.02 4.4
The waste product contains large amounts of nitrogen,phosphorus,and zinc. The waste should be applied at rates needed to meet crop nitrogen requirement unless one of the other elements are more restrictive. When
soil test P is very high and the site is vulnerable to phosphorus movement to nearby surface water,limit application of P to estimated crop removal of this element. Limit zinc application as necessary to avoid excess
accumulation of this element in the soil.
Sample Information Laboratory Results(parts per million unless otherwise noted)
Sample ID: N P K Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Ca B Mo Cl C
J1C2 Total 3260 346 2226 950 358 154 49.3 11.3 11.4 2.88 2.21
IN-N
Waste Code: -AW4
LSD -NO3 Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li pN SS C.•N DM% CCE% ALE(K al)
Description: OR-N 555 7.15
Dairy Li .Slurry Urea _
Recommendations: Nutrients Available for First Crop lbs 1000 Mfirons Other Elements lbs 1000 gallons
Application Metbod N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu B Mo Cl Na M Cd Pb Al Se Li
Broadcast 11.7 4.6 17.8 5.6 2.1 0.90 0.29 0.07 0.08 0.02 0.01 4.6
Irrigation 10.9 4.6 17.8 5.6 2.1 0.90 0.29 0.07 0.08 0.02 0.01 4.6
The waste contains a large amount of nitrogen. To protect the environment,be careful to apply the waste only at rates needed to meet crop nitrogen requirement.
The waste product contains a large amount of sodium. This element can accumulate in soils where it replaces calcium and contributes to excess soluble salts. Sodium may also damage the foliage of sensitive plants
where the waste is a liquid and applied in overhead irrigation s tems. Monitor sodium accumulation in the soil where the waste is routinely applied.

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Rhone: [phone] Web Site:www.neagr.com/agronomi` Report No: 11525
Grower: Crawford,Jerry Copies To:
4 40"Crawford Dairy Rd.
t4, s_ Chapel Hill,NC 27516
Soil Test Report
Farm: 19-20
1/12/2007 SERVING N.C.RESIDENTS FOR OVER 60 YEARS Chatham County
Agronomist Comments
A -- 3,$,12
There was insufficient soil to provide a complete analysis for some samples.When submitting samples,please fill
the sample box to the fill line marked on the side.Also,please make sure that the sample boxes are packed tightly
so that they are not crushed and/or spilled in transit.Thank you.
leana Myers,AVonomist
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime NP205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
25307 1st Crop: Corn,Silage 0 180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$ 3
2nd Crop: Soybeans 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 pH$ 3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ae pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-A1(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS-I NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.46 1.01 14.8 96.0 0.6 6.8 292 297 60.0 26.0 245 152 145 541 541 209 39 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime NP205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
23462 1st Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M 1.3T 120-200 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M 0 120-200 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-I S-I SS-1 NO3-N AWN Na
MIN 0.51 0•80 13.2 79.0 2.8 5.5 139 320 45.0 21.0 238 16o 16o 567 567 113 47 0.2
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations s
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
2346K 1st Crop: Corn,Silage 1T 180-220 0 70-90 0 0 0 0 .0 0 3
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 20-40 0 0 0 0 .0 0 3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4 N Na
MIN o.6 1.21 4.7 62.0 1.8 5.2 125 58 41.0 15.0 191 132 125 98 98 29 36 0.0

All JUFAALLN AV601E11OW111c DIVIIS1011 Alone: I,`.�15►);i3�-LbS�`� weo�nue:wwW:ncagr,i nm���lrun9t11.t/ urorRIU: Crawford,Jerry Report No: 17525 vg 2
Field Information jApplicd Lime Recommendations _ _ _
Sample No. Last Crop ,Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lame P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
25306 1st Crop: Corn,Silage 0 180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 3
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I KI Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI(1)Mn-Al(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.66 1.07 7.8 83.0 1.3 5.9 237 170 52.0 20.0 123 92 85 232 232 64 31 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime i P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zu B Mn See Note
23581 1st Crop: Corn,Silage 0 180-220 0-20 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 3
2nd Crop: Corn,Silage 0 180-220 0-20 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Ma-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-Al Cu-1 S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.71 0•98 9.5 84.0 1.5 5.9 71 147 52.0 24.0 1351 829 829 171 171 82 35 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime I Recommendations
-�Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A f Crop or Year Lime P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
25332 1st Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M 0 120-200 0 0 0 15-20 0 0 .0 pH$ 12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M 0 120-200 0 0 0 15-20 0 0 .0 pH$ 12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.46 0•97 14.0 99.0 0.2 7.1 84 125 61.0 33.0 1686 1012 1012 341 341 194 25 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations _
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year. Lime P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
2530P 1st Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M 0
_ 2nd Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M 0
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I KI Ca% Mg% Mn-I Mn-AI(l)Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-1 S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
0.6 196 248 226 552 91 43 0.1
Field Information Applied Lime Recommendations _
Sample No. Last Crop Mo Yr T/A Crop or Year Lime ' P205 K20 Mg S Cu Zn B Mn See Note
53012 1st Crop: Corn,Silage 0 180-220 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$ 3
2nd Crop: Small Grains 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 pH$ 3
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI(I)Mn-AI(2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-I S-I SS-1 NO3-N NH4-N Na
MIN 0.66 0•96 15.0 100.0 0.0 7.4 276 338 61.0 28.0 1096 653 646 376 376 161 46 0.1

Form SLUR-1
Slurry and Sludge Application Field Record
For Recording Slurry and Lagoon Sludge Application Events on Different Fields
Farm Owner Facility Number -
Spreader Operator
Date Field Size Application. #of Loads Volume of Loads(2)
Tract# Field mm/dd/vr Crop Tv a (acresl (l) Per Field (gallons)
(1)SI=soil incorporated(disked);BR=broadcast(surface applied)
(2)Can be found in operators manual for spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owner's manual.

Form SLUR-2
Slurry and Sludge Application Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Tract# Field# Facility Number
-
Field size(acres)_(A) -
Farm Owner Spreader Operator
Owner's Address Spreader Operator's
Address
Owner's Phone#
Operator's Phone#
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type
Recommended PAN
Loading(lb/acre)=(B)
1 2 3 14 5 6 7)
8
Date
Total Volume Volume per Acre PAN Applied Nitrogen Balance(3)
(gallons) (gals/acre) (2)
(mm/dd/yr) #of Loads Per Field (1) (g ) Waste Analysis PAN (ibs/acre) (Ibs/acre)
Volume of Loads (2}x(3) (4)_iA (lbs/1000 gals) 6 x S _ 1 000 B - 7
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature
Certified Operator(Print) Operator Certification#
(1)Can be found in operator's manual for the spreader.Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owner's manual.
.(2)See your animal waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum,waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events.
(3)Enter the value received by subtracting column(7)from(B).Continue subtracting column(7)from column(8)following each application event.

t \,1 /1-J 1 .!1 t 5 i t l- ,{; ri r`•J ! j 4 a.\ I a �, ir ~♦�`• . r ♦ t � %a
77
/ t. l�lar, 1�\ J �j;t\\�1;_}`yl♦j�l
I/ J.rirStJt't •t�,l,,/7rf�tJ1lf_JtrJ�tJ/��� fr,�`ltf�`.yJiJ\t •}�'!♦�a�'IS�lrJJ��)a�l�i!/■.a!►titJ\,J ♦Trl�y�♦j�l/
1� j\r`!\�7 Y~1\/a/1 r♦ /^ /t / 1/a ��! r i r \ \• ♦ \ _ \5 y 1 J a!\I i r t ♦ 1/t•. r \!♦ \/
NJ ♦�%I/al,I,'' -lk!`/�lJti ��_/�' 1♦ J�� �t \r\�/\.i 1��r t -_ !\�\ r i Y S \J • � _�f�(`�I �1..
tJ\/\mot. / t \/`fa `,/ �1 ! ,`� . r../ ! } L _fa / J�.•f \/ /!+ �- \ 1 }.t'.lal�r♦i%/ �t.Ji�lati � / a/
�i tir / t .5i�'! /1_ �/ ! -l�iS ltr.}`f♦ - y ��\ftJ�t J•t �/� J J \(�„/ i/ "'r\/f , 1 ♦ \,t ,t zJa/ 1�
ti.�l.t�a�/ . Itr-\ ram.l�1 \ t J'j l r 7S J.. 1 \! f lr\ \ r• �t -t �\ti�l 5% a !~l~fi � a. / � \
5.�i\ star { it/ t l�.. '�\ �f`_ t t\ Jr\!•. f\� , f
\ / ♦ .a�/t t \j\'t/� t/rr `tt�►/I J\ !-t
\r J t,J 1 t �,,/Y�l,,.� 1_L 1-�`r ♦r � I �r � _♦ .
1.5 /�\ I� t .� ,♦�.�/ !S \ �ilifl, �[�a iagl'Q��lce' �� J IjW I �'fa7 at•1 a r��ly`�I-\11\!\J♦ t �(1
/\ J.+ I t \ / t 1 � I \ >• r !�
dp-t '\�, n LI�J�ri�a�!S�+\``�♦� .'1r I� ti,
\rir '\•I`'JJI ti}�•}r!- t JS t:i \�A\ irJIrSJ i\J!\! *,! f\��J� `! -\,f Ja', `rlttJt�tir�ral..`I�'"",J♦1.1 err%%,o r�.1
1~1 /.�I/1-'r`r "1 �-1!♦i; J ` 1 �)r t J r. Y Ji/�t,�r l '� y�iJ`.i r tlj-J i r� l f_� r~J 1 5�515
�-"/♦I�� ♦_.Il,rt/`�S�yri1 FIJ J \�;�J't_l.-/ lirr\/\r'j`\rt' t,t�IJ�Jaj\j\! t "I`J�ftJlJal`��..J\5 �•_. 5r i�'1�� }� a_t J\
at ~J♦ \5i\ !\I' S/ !S ,\ _}!1/ rtJ4r^/Jtli1�t ��` -l��l-ly.'�\rSJ♦ f lam'\y! i •Jtv • �\L o.
LaV, J5+/\l� iJ •i-�`J1111r� tr`r4tiJ_11� , \r .l. tr_r i
l Jam\ � � \1 t��t�1 \...~ 5tr\ �If I1Ir♦/� `Ir/ Jam. t-1 N.
�a /~�� �f\1 t\��♦J\�
� +\ i rf� lJ/1�.�♦ttif'^."y�.J yr\I1J ��
! \ 1 •. i ar\f �\t\5/tJJ..l�S��J/t\- 1� 1/ i•tJ��1/ar1t�lt�'1�r`:�..11' Sif� S`try� J+�.+�♦�t:ft.t\r. i�_I F_�`r\tiy�l��'T.
■'� �t, 1�t _`f.\`\`tit.- yrj t , / / -r\ 1\��J..#\ \ i! JI,_ r♦ \I11J11 t^r�trl ,It\t.r\J,.��I �S
/t/r� l1� f\ Stray -5� \f rttl, \L�A�1`���� J f .`rti rjr 5'J \
\ ' � l, )�. {.. ♦♦ �Slt t / r,,rS
J- ! + !.� � J .,` r�Sr ♦/� �\l5i�l�tf�.�'' �rt`y\Jr.},ljrl
� q '� / 5 ; .t
' �\/ s♦r ♦ J- `, r^t�-)til / 5+Y\ � ! '.\JrS` t r ti �'•.}�riJY�lair\1! Y .S �♦
f _ la ! \r ar / •\ t I \J \! e l 1�1 `t r�l.`a�J•! t rak! \ '\�l i l
\J r r r ti 1/ \ t i}�I.r {. \1'! Ja ♦ ,t\� r , , \t
't,tilrf�r`yt;��\I�t flja!t\�) �''t� / \��-/�;/a`t`t rJ51t 4 �r.I� t`1\`l�♦!,_1!`/J�r�f5��\f1J�..'Jl_� tit .. I`S..tl/ �
/\''`11..; 7 t \ J♦ J�IaSw;Ja7�J�` i t t�/•5 /t.r�IF/�jr�t�t'/..IaaJ\�iJ� /-{\,1�\1 11\I\!tom
�1"\�ft'r! +! ` r}a11`r�\/1 i��11�t' �`/ 'ta•`Jet,1t/1}^'at\j�rri \trl/..Ira`..t�L.�tr�tti �lfS �.J��ralaJatt�rl\�\( `If,
\Ir\rr�rlV �j {!1,�.♦. t�t..I tj ►1 .
1 ! '\ l
ti.r!`! /a��t,.!'�I `r ft JJ+�1 �\i %♦�fIL��• J�J�
:,��\; 1 .i~r�i� tr� ♦1�\�'\f JJ\� '��t`li/i.�i
f \ %\r�J�,J
tr\ ti r`-t,,`/ !�+`ll Ir\lt J 'ti- t• i t~ter.
r � i�1/..!\r•t/r `1 !r r �rlr*� - ��-T}J. ia�1�`�
%+'tom /I ll�/ar�`.•���1%.Ji�}r 1�� iJa�li�I/ 1�.
1tr i♦% \,Y/�`I� I\a,/1 `fa./" 1\ \ �J�//tr�l a. t `.
r a J�• / t a/ I , I� r j 'l r \�L l�a�t
if J ! IaJ. 1~ ♦� \=\! f`7, J - -.. .- .�,' �R, _rrr ♦i�.I� i-
\/.4r1-t r-�1~�J rtrr.li(• ~I t� I ti A'
-t-
tz/aJt-t\t}t� r.e.x
�t \J♦�I,5t1�1��`t�tl�la� \1�t� s a' `lira r i.t t%r' I�f
-, tS ,!`rti! • a-! aJ�S�� - t I\ ?� 'a r .. - L •. : ,, fS\!�1 /1.
�•'"J'I.�t-, li-\ ti�t5�\rt/�♦i 1 � ,rr¢ "^S ,.. � ��'• �'/'`�s.5 s � � t�1 �feral-�l-
le
I\ ^\r \>> \t/t-" a`\`/i 9 r^- t ,. r Sr y1a4 •, r}.t S ''' �'1$ 1.1I
tilt 5�/^rar5� .1\r_/ �� .e- . erlw ;,y �.. s. :ems tt ' -fit e` .•S // r}` \/
_\ /r�a f\ � r r /\,,, a t i � ,.a!:; x :� v. \ 'A -'°'iax.. lfr r} r i•� \
l=J �a�l�J'(l!}4{�)�"\a.\ter tt ' r . . •,. dam . y■� ` /ta/t
-!r♦` t
:r.\" - : r �l tr` t it�r� J\. ,�. - � _ . ,. at ' r t-• - ... � � / \ tl..\!I.
! \. J ry,♦I - ,,frtl r\ rSi't/ J J, !/_ . 1�t i ♦ l / 1 i.
`�//\ -a�a'f!1!``il/�/I ��SJ�♦tlt�; `taf\iti'�l�5r�1 J..���/t�l/i!J�/\/ ►� /_. rJ�. r/ttla �lji\I `r,1.'•/I}ol tr'�[
j�l `\s: t �♦� t1/tr�lya{/ ,a�t�Ir�rIS..J.. �♦^';�I�tti�/
t Y . ■ r 5 , i�� \r\S il/aJ ..\/\ t \ t / ♦ t• �!
-Jit `!.\ter \rS«,1" i. 1 r /\.5a 'rJ ♦�li a �/� I �t r / �a ,.
+ \`tL/Ir \� /a /tit ,•/
N . � tlf ♦ Ja j `t/ / } � 1 } � 1 rl�• 1�;� , r' '" -1t r..5
J rl S. -N _% �jt��Llf 1�4u ��0��� r♦ /�\�fti��j`I^J�!^� 1
`�a / _i �r r ♦ \— . /t
;7/J: ti\ty�%a/ttJ7/\!r/rtJ' '`T1�� y . a =fi♦ JitJa��\r_a •�!t% \\ J
rat\ ti r�lr+a\, ♦�I _!t! '\ri -\j5iti' t. Lrri\ti/.may 1~f`..IJ`.
t-,i/r ! /a \ \/\/ ft � .1 / / ♦ -I.. r„I r ! / t 11 . -�r_,�1( ♦I,r,L.��,.,\Ir-t r�}. l �t,�\„-,-i_� J.._`I 5.r !
t i ajJi t J.t�}a!��;S yJ�a�/; J���i�( 1 a1 ia�J t .I�," t♦ \t` /\t t a/LWJ �d4tl+lt ol'e /+N}/tf"Wiy
f.s r•%a rt.i �rt.�J•! ♦ti•l/t`t`t t "k/\r Jr/a i�r.l / :.
` -1- �J\t,r.ta-a/a/ i♦ _/!! \- j J.�t� � J ♦ . r ) _\ _ I 1}�,�
!_♦1�J• ar:Ji�/��J� t/� .j,�dal+l t � tfi..L� �'t�t`i/�,i♦1//�"t!\�\Itr`!i�I�j�.-•ram!t\tj•\r`lt r�s_jar 1'�f� S r�1/t
' •� r�`� t�I/Nrirft '' ara/ a rr\ alat• l /� \ '.'.tl ` ii;4!\%'
~7 ,`! /1 f•tl t r r J \r ~ r••~/\J-5 {/ ./\r 1/.� �' ! !,r I y� _ ` % , .�`I!a •�1 /
! t t ``a ra r\/ � / � / \tr. J'/ �'1 ♦lzt` I . lt I` �! r it - I "+%rtfl
_yr.1 t a� li♦' l�iJ/ . �tf Lim !+5 .fJ !� ♦. ra -t" I��� _ rti~ `\ 1t/� i�t \ /♦ //�`/: �_ti.`t41
r`���tJ,lat•L f �/ f♦'�r\�`�\!\�?'r/ ♦f♦i�lr}`,rt �a j`t+t�`rr.+~fat/± ll♦fa�J;1�
-, \ 1�-J! i.- f ♦/ \ \iJa`j/t��```SraJi,1\Ijtl♦I"l�/} �j♦J�rIL �tli '! IaT �}1raJir\ Jr ft \`,I/jr♦��!'
rr' /I- /� \ .1-may/\` ♦f ♦ it +�t�tJa S!�`/I �` S\. i� /` • //\I t \_ '1 1;\'`1�=♦/i;Ji' ♦i`! t�JtJt1+lr
)`I +` y 1�5-1!♦ `! ` a ♦ `` Jal±!-/ !
\iJrl�la'tr\ }�/• / l ~f� /�• -Jt�/ f�li4/-1j / �J■ I♦. i a- -r, _l t
;talS`J.^lr♦-1�}%`-r\ i • !�i\I\a�r�,Jj.atr�t/� ti`1-t/t���`/1;f:_��♦�!,
i\ ,a'tJ \Itf-� �J�t r.- ! !`l�I� :1�r,l \j !�'r\ \1 f� J\ I r�J i, i r �I,, J• /t`'rr� rt_tJ .J+_`J t:
-'ti ,,5 �S/ -' \J\J\ '.t\�1 `Jt .�\ti}_�Ja1t1/\ 5 �\ ...1.1�♦ J\" al\ J\J \JJ,r\j fv`J \J J�J�a \!� \ \J! 1/ \/♦ r�r(a/ .'.~tr( Ia
Jam .,\iJr \, / Jt . \T/\ / j� �/�1,.5_ll/"tiY�J/...!- /�1♦"/� ..\!\ Jai`,r5:►��`%�� t�t.!��r�\+�j♦(�♦, \�._a/rates •.!.
_ �} �• .�\r . J_.J \ ��J1r,/ S I , t/ �, t _l�f\1�-ter.- -1�J L�5r'\ \ t•i ! r J\�\\f1r5�5 �� ! � '.r
,\tlrt' !r-tom\ �t/�fJsJ .,tlt' `'%tt ^�/t-%a �J � \^ J�f.�-J1� \JlfaJ.! /fir/\�!/` J r.l.' r\/ I�/_�\r/�;�+�`♦ t.�i
t t`JI �aiJi♦ 1\�•t♦I "'J_L\ram! 51�1•Jr����1��mot`j��♦ / lj♦�t y�5.a,.r.\`f��r�:tt/`jl/'tr ,
�`Ja J\ I\�\�` \`t♦l a1\/ ti ._r JJ\- !`t .�/a
/`ram\J�L 1 '\� a\ ♦t"J`y/1J} i\rl%J1�1� ti'l5a l�t \� t!;J�I�S� r1�`I♦jt tJt\r-t!tJ
r

Field Calibration Procedures for Semi-Solid
Animal Waste Application Equipment
LOAD-AREA Information presented in manufacturer's charts are based on average operat-
METHOD ing conditions for relatively new equipment. Discharge rates and application
SPREADER SYSTEM rates change over time as equipment gets older and components wear. For
pump and haul application equipment, application rates and patterns may
vary depending on forward travel and/or PTO speed, gear box settings, gate
openings, operating pressures, spread widths, and overlaps.
Equipment should be calibrated on a regular basis to ensure proper appli-
cation rates and uniformity. Calibration is a simple procedure involving col-
lecting and measuring the material being applied at several locations in the
application area. Calibration helps ensure that nutrients from animal waste
are applied efficiently and at proper rates.
Pump and Haul Application Systems
rate is dependent on ground speed so a uniform
Liquid applicators and tank spreaders are an alterna- speed must be maintained throughout the swath
tive to irrigation systems for transporting and apply- length.Ground-driven applicators apply reasonably
ing liquid lagoon effluent,liquid manure slurries, and uniform rates independent of ground speed.
lagoon sludges.Proper location and design of pump-
ing and loading pads are necessary to protect equip- Load-Area Method Calibration
ment and operators and avoid damaging the lagoon Procedure
dike or embankment. Care should be taken to mini-
mize spills during loading and transport. 1. Spread at least one full load of manure in a
Semi-solid (slurry) applicators can be calibrated by rectangular field pattern.
one of two methods: load-area method, and weight- 2. Measure the length and width of coverage. Do
area method (see AG-553-4).Liquid applicators are not include the outer fringe areas of the coverage
best calibrated by the load-area method. which receive much lighter applications than the
overlapped areas.
Load-Area Method
3. Multiply the length (feet) by the width (feet) and
To use the load-area method,you must know the divide by 43,560 to determine the coverage area in
spreader capacity.Spreader capacity is normally rated acres.
by the manufacturer and often is indicated on the
application equipment. Liquid spreaders are normally 4. Divide the weight or volume of load of manure in
rated in gallons while semi-solid spreaders are rated in the spreader by the acres covered to determine the
either bushels or cubic feet. : application rate in tons or gallons per acre.
As the name implies, the load-area method 5. If the application rate (Item 4) is not acceptable,
involves applying a full load to a measured area.For repeat the procedure at different spreader settings,
ease of measurement, it is best to use a rectangular speeds,or both until the desired application rate
field pattern. For PTO-driven spreaders, application (tons or gallons per acre) is achieved.

LOAD=AREA METHOD
SPREADER SYSTEM
CALIBRATING LIQUID MANURE SPREADERS USING THE LOAD-AREA METHOD
1. Determine the capacity of the manure spreader.
a. gallons
2. Spread at least one full load using the regular spreading patterns of the applicator.
Trial"I Trial Trial
b. Forward speed, gear, or
throttle setting
c. PTO speed or setting
d. Spreader gate setting
3. Measure the area of spread.
e. Spread area width ft
f. Spread area length ft
g. Spread area (e X f) ft2
h. Spread area (g _ 43,560) acre
4. Compute the manure application rate.
L Number of loads spread
j. Capacity per load (a) — — .- gallons
k. Total manure spread (i X j) _ -- gallons
I. Application rate (k_ h) gal/acre
5. Compute the nutrient application rate.
m. Manure analysis N Ibs/1000 gallons
P205 _ Ibs/1000 gallons
K20 _ Ibs/1000 gallons
n. Application rate N Ibs/acre
(I X manure P205 Ibs/acre
analysis number
1000) K20 Ibs/acre
6. If the application rate is not acceptable, repeat the procedure at different spreader settings, speeds (Item 2),
or both, until the desired application rate is achieved.

Prepared by
I.C. Barker, Biological and Agricultural Engineering Extension Specialist
R.O. Evans, Biological and Agricultural Engineering Extension Specialist
D.A. Crouse, Soil Science Extension Specialist
2,500 copies of this public document were printed at a cost of$577, or$.23 per copy.
Published by
NORTH CAROLINA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE
Distributed in furtherance of the Acts of Congress of May 8 and June 30,1914.Employment and program opportunities are offered to all people
regardless of race,color,national origin,sex,age,or disability.North Carolina State University,North Carolina A&T State University,U.S.Depart-
ment of Agriculture,and local governments cooperating.
7/97-2.5M—JMG/KEL AG-553-5
E97 31963

Soil Sampling Basics Page 1 of 3
NORTH CAROLINA DEPAHTII/II3w Qt QJGHUGQUFU" Er CONSUMER SERVICES
Agronomic Division NCDA&CS Miscellaneous Publication (revised Dec 2004)
Home Page
About the Division
Field Services
Nematode Assay S
Plant/Waste/Solution Soil Sampling Basics
Soil Testinc
Agronomic Site Map
A rg otips
FAQS
Find Your Report
Information Sheets Useful Facts
News Releases
• The sample you submit should be representative of the area.
Publications • Sandy coastal plain soils should be tested every 2 to 3 years on average.
Related Sites Fine-textured soils from the piedmont or mountains should be tested every 3
Virtual Tour to 4 years.
• Test results and recommendations can vary within short distances.
• A detailed map or an aerial photograph is useful for outlining fields and
assigning permanent identification codes (5 characters maximum).
Characteristics of Predictive (Routine) Soil Samples
• The grower is primarily interested in receiving lime and fertilizer
recommendations.
• The area sampled has no known history of fertility problems.
• Samples are processed in the order received. It may take one to several
weeks for analysis to be completed.
Charactistics of Diagnostic (Problem) Soil Samples
• Plants or crops have not responded as expected, and the grower suspects a
nutrient problem.
• Diagnostic samples receive the same analyses as predictive samples,
except soluble salts are also measured.
• The best diagnostic samples are actually paired samples. Comparison of
samples from both good and bad areas makes it easier to confirm a fertility
problem.
• Problem samples have priority over predictive samples. They are moved to
the head of the line and usually processed within 1 week or less. [Note: Don't
try to get predictive samples processed more quickly by labelling them as
diagnostic samples. It won't work.]
• Shipping packages containing diagnostic samples must be clearly marked so
they will not end up mixed in with predictive samples.
Taking Samples
http://www.neagr.com/agronomi/basics.htm 4/19/2007

Soil Sampling Basics Page 2 of 3
• For agricultural samples, take 15 to 20 cores from each area.
• For lawn and garden samples, take 6 to 8 samples per area(front, back,
side, etc.).
• Use a clean stainless steel or steel sampling instrument. A soil probe is best,
but a shovel will work.
• Place each soil core into a clean plastic bucket. Avoid using metal buckets or
containers.
• Walk a random pattern over the sampling area.
• Look for changes in soil color, texture, slope and history to divide area into
separate samples.
• Do not group together cores from areas that you know have received
different treatments. These special areas should be sampled separately.
• Avoid field borders, ditch banks, old brush piles, burn sites, etc.
• If crop response has been different in an area and the area is large enough
to manage separately, then sample it separately.
• The sampling depth for agricultural land where conventional tillage is
practiced is 6 to 8 inches. In areas where a pasture or hay crop is to be
established or a conservation tillage or no-till plan started, sample to a 6-to
8-inch depth. Where an existing sod is already established, such as pasture
or hay, sampling depth is 4 inches. Where conservation or no-till is
established, sampling depth is 4 inches.
• Samples from lawns should be taken to a depth of 4 inches. Samples from
gardens, shrubs or any other homeowner site should be taken to a depth of
4 to 6 inches.
• Keep sampling areas manageable units. Avoid making units too large or too
small. No sample should represent an area larger than 15 to 20 acres.
Extremely small areas can be difficult to treat.
• If soil is too wet to till, it is likely best to wait for dryer conditions before taking
samples. Wet soils are difficult to mix thoroughly and may affect the quality
of the subsample taken.
• After sampling an area, thoroughly mix the sample breaking up clumps and
removing any large particles of trash. Fill the sample box to the fill line
marked on the side of the box. Be sure the box is marked with the correct
sample identification and the grower name.
Submitting Samples
• Put samples in NCDA&CS sample boxes. Boxes are available at all county
Cooperative Extension centers and from the NCDA&CS Agronomic Division
office in Raleigh.
• Use permanent ink to label each sample box and complete the information
sheet. Do not use felt tip pens since most of them do not contain waterproof
ink. Boxes labeled with a pencil can be very difficult to read if the sample box
becomes dirty.
• List the crop code shown on the back of the information sheet in the
appropriate column.
• Do not put sample in a plastic bag inside the sample box. Results and
recommendations for samples received in plastic bags will be delayed.
• Do not tape up sample box seams unless the sample is from a quarantined
area.
• Do not place sample boxes inside a plastic bag before shipping. Moisture in
samples may cause boxes to deteriorate.
• Do not put information sheets inside sample boxes. Attach information
sheets to the outside of the shipping box or put them inside the shipping box
next to or on top of the samples.
• Do not use sample boxes as mailing containers.
http://www.ncagr.com/agronomi/basics.htrn 4/19/2007

Soil Sampling Basics Page 3 of 3
. Do not send samples in manilla envelopes, padded or nonpadded. Samples
should be shipped in a sturdy, corrugated cardboard box.
J. Kent Messick, Agronomist
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division
4300 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607-6465
[phone]
Agronomic Division Web site: www.ncagr.com/agronomi/
Agronomic Reports online: agronomy.state.agr.nc.us/
Last Updated April 1, 2005
Mission Statement Accessibility Statement Disclaimer Privacy Statement
Telephone Numbers for Speech and Hearing Impaired.
TTY: 1-800-735-2962 Voice: 1-877-735-8200
http://www.neagr.com/agronomi/basics.htm 4/19/2007

When shipping several types of agronomic samples,
package each type separately.For example,place soil Agronomic Division
samples in one package,nematode assay samples in Reasons for Soil Testing A Strategy for Collecting Samples
another package,and plant/waste/solution samples in
yet another package. Make sure each package is Soil
North Carolina,most soils are naturally acidic and Improperly collected soil samples are the weak link in
addressed to the appropriate laboratory. V o it Testing low in nutrients Both lime and fertilizer are required the soil testing process.For test results to be useful,the
for good plant growth and yield(Fig.1).Soil testing is sample must accurately reflect the variability and
Look for your soil test report(s)online.Just select the best way to find out how much lime and fertilizer to conditions in the field. A sample from a single spot
"Find Your Report"from the left navigation baron the apply based on the crop and existing field conditions. cannot do this.
Agronomic Division's home page www.ncagr.com/
agronomi You will also receive a copy of the report in - Without soil testing,managing crop nutrients is difficult Before sampling,make a detailed map of your land.
the mail.For help interpreting reports, contact your due to the complex nature of their interactions with the For small areas,simply draw a diagram.For large tracts,
NCDA&CS regional agronomist. soil.Acid soils,for example,can limit root growth and aerial photographs may be helpful.
cause certain nutrients to be unavailable for plants.
Unless soil acidity and pH are corrected through liming, Divide the map into individual sample areas of20 acres
applying fertilizer may cause additional problems rather or less.Assign a short,permanent sample identification
�I For additional information contact than enhance yield. name to each area that will help you remember its
location.Keep in mind that the sample ID space on the
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Soil testing measures the soil's nutrient-holding capacity soil test box is limited to five characters.
Soil Testing Section and provides a basis for sound land management
decisions. The lime and fertilizer recommendations Each sample area should consist of only one general soil.
Physical Address: 430E REEDY CREEK RD t given on the soil test report are cost effective and help type or condition.If a field varies in slope,color,drainage
RALEIGH NC 27607-6465 optimize crop yield.Following these recommendations or texture and if those areas can be fertilized separately,
also protects the environment by safeguarding against submit a separate sample for each area(Fig.2).
Mailing Address- 104E MAIL SERVICE CENTER excess fertilizer application.
RALEIGH NC 27699-]040 If the field being sampled has been divided into sections
for various crops,submit a sample for each section—
Phone. (9]9)733-2655 Types of Soil Tests _ even if you now plan to grow the same crop across the
Web site: www.ncagr.com/agronomi The Agronomic Division of the N.C. Department of, entire field.Areas where liming or fertilizing patterns
Agriculture and Consumer Services conducts soil tests have differed from the rest of the field should also be
free of charge for all state residents.The tests can be sampled separately.
Prepared by either predictive or diagnostic.
David H Hardy,Jeana Myers
&Catherine Stokes Predictive(or routine)soil tests estimate the nutrient — -
requirements of the plants to be grown. Samples for
revised August 2006 Enhancing this kind of analysis are usually taken before the growing
season. The report provides site-specific lime and - t
fertilizer recommendations based on soil class,pH
Land Productivity, ,
levels of nutrients in the soil,and crop requirements.
Colleen M.Hudak-Wise,Director Nutrient Use Efficiency
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Diagnostic (or problem)soil tests identify nutrient-
related problems that occur during the growing season.Fa Environmental Quality
Steve Troxler,Commissioner ofAgriculturc. They are like predictive soil tests,except that soluble
salt levels are also measured Test results are reviewed
N.C. Dept. of.Agriculture by a staff agronomist who makes recommendations for - - - _ s t
adjustments in fertilization based on site-specific Figure 1. Nutrient management is critical for
3,00E copies of this public document were printed c
at a cost of$300.99 or$O.fO per copy. ircumstances, optimum crop production.

When to Collect Samples _ How to Collect Routine Samples To ensure a representative sample,avoid taking cores A Strategy for Collecting Samples).Sample boxes
from small areas where soil conditions differ are easiest to label before they are folded.
Collect and submit samples three to six months before Essential tools for collecting soil samples include a substantially from those in the rest of the field—for
a projected planting date if you want to be able to base plastic bucket and a shovel or a soil probe.Do not use example,wet spots,severely eroded areas,old building Use the standard soil sample boxes provided by the
fertilizer plans on a current soil test report.Most farmers brass, bronze or galvanized tools because they can sites,fence rows,spoil banks,burn-row areas,and old NCDA&CS Agronomic Division.Do not place soil in
submit samples immediately after fall harvest,making contaminate samples with metals.Clean the bucket and woodpile or fire sites.Also,avoid fertilizer bands where plastic bags.Close box flaps securely to prevent soil
November through March the laboratory's busiest tools before collecting samples to prevent small row crops have been grown.Cores from these spots from spilling and mixing with that of other samples
season.To avoid delays,submit samples from April amounts of lime and fertilizer residue from can adversely influence soil test results and during shipment.Do not tape boxes shut.If you take
through October,if your schedule will allow it, contaminating the sample and distorting test results. recommendations. samples from a quarantined area,call us for special
handling instructions.
In most cases,it is not necessary to take soil samples The correct depth for a sample depends on the cropping For each sample,collect and thoroughly mix at least
eve year.In the coastal lain,once eve 2 or 3 ears situation(Fig.3.For cultivated row crops or vegetable 15 cores in a clean plastic bucket.Using this mixture, Complete all appropriate blanks on the information
every y P n Y ( g ) P g
is adequate;in the piedmont and mountains,once every gardens,sample to the depth you would plow,normally fill a standard soil sample box to the"fill line." sheet(s)and write legibly.Be consistent from ye,-
3 to 4 years will do.An effective strategy is to sample 6-8 inches.This is the zone where lime and fertilizer year in how you list your name,farm name anL....
one-half ofyour land each year ifyou live in the coastal are incorporated.For established pasture and turf as Provide ALL information requested on the box and the address.List the crops you intend to grow,along with
plainandone-thirdofyourlandeachyearifyoulivein well as for established minimum-tillage or no-till appropriate information sheet. Use Soil Sample the crop codes.Homeowners should use codes found
the piedmont or mountains. operations, sample to a depth of 4 inches. When Information(white form AD-1)for routine samples and under the heading Lawn, Garden and Ornamentals.
establishing these systems,however,sample to an 8- Diagnostic Soil Sample Information (orange form Also,check to make sure that the sample ID on the form
inch depth. AD-2) for problem samples. Boxes and forms are corresponds to the one on the soil sample box and on
available from NCDA&CS regional agronomists,the the farm map.Prior to placing samples in the shipping
�. �^- �► - -�+ Collect soil cores with a probe at 15 to 20 random Agronomic Division in Raleigh,Cooperative Extension container,make certain that a sample box is present for
locations across a field(Fig.2).Zigzag patterns help offices and local agribusinesses.
each line entry on the information sheet.
ensure that samples accurately reflect overall field
conditions andvariabili Although a soil robe is ideal, Place individual sample boxes upright in a sturdy
'L ty. g p How to Collect Problem Samples cardboard container for shipping.The sample box is
cores can be collected with a shovel as follows:remove not a shipping container!Stack samples no more than
r soil forming a small hole,cut a one-inch thick cross- When soil samples are being used to identify a potential three boxes high.Place a piece of cardboard between
�% section of soil from the wall of the hole to the proper plant nutrient problem, a more thorough sampling layers to help prevent crushing ofthe lower boxes.Pack
sample depth,and carefully place the soil in the bucket. strategy is needed.Collect topsoil(as indicated in Fig.
individual sample boxes Firmly in the shipping container.
3)as well as subsoil samples 8 to 16 inches deep.Be Fill empty space with crumpled newspaper.Do not put
sure to keep topsoil and subsoil samples separate and more than 40 samples in a single shipping container.
labeled appropriately. Shipping containers may be available from NCDA&CS
regional agronomists or county extension offices.
In both instances,follow the guidelines for collecting a
Pasture,
1 ! representative sample.Take cores at random locations Place information sheets inside the shipping conta'
l a
Orchards throughout the problem area even though it may be with the samples and keep a copy for your records.i.
&Mlnimum relatively small.In addition, collect a representative a good idea to place information sheets inside a sealed
o Cultivated sample from normal areas of the same field. By plastic bag to keep them clean and legible.However,
!K^--- -�' • Tillage CmPs comparing soil test results from normal and problem never use a plastic bag to transport and ship samples.
" areas and from various depths,staff agronomists will
r be better equipped to pinpoint the problem and provide Seal the shipping container with heavy-duty tape.Write
} recommendations for corrective action. the grower's name on the outside of the container.When
sending more than one container, label each one to
How to Package Samples indicate the total number being sent:for example,"Box
-- - I of3,""Box 2 of3,""Box 3 of3."When sending problem
a
Use permanent black ink when filling out the samples,write"Problem Samples"clearly in large red
Figure 2. Sampling patterns for a field with Figure 3. Proper sampling depth varies information sheet(s)and labelling soil sample box(es). letters on the outside,top, and sides of the mailing
three distinct soil types. depending on the kind of crop you plan to grow. Use the appropriate sample ID from your field map(see container.

_Molnitorin & Record KeepinAgronomic DlvlsiIDn Waste Generated iin North Carolina
Growers who use wastes as fertilizer benefit from � � � information on nutrient content and other relevant
North Carolina generates a large variety and quantity chemical properties.Specialists provide advice about
maintaining precise records of their activities, of waste annually.All industries produce waste—food appropriate agronomic use of waste products and help
including waste analysis reports,application rates/dates production and processing, textile and furniture growers interpret waste report results.
and crop sites.Records ofh been
Waste manufacturing,pharmaceutical production,and wood
a or biennial soil tests
provide evidence that PH has been maintained properly processing and paper production.Municipalities and
P Responsible use of agricultural, industrial and.
and that nutrient requirements are in line with
Analysis many waste are operations also generate waste.Since municipal wastes helps protect the environment and
applications. Plant analysis reports can provide the many wastes are converted into by-products or reduced preserve water and soil resources.Table 1 shows the
evidence needed to justify increases in application rates and disposed of by the waste generator,it is difficult average plant-available nutrient content of animal
to maximize production. Yield and quality records to estimate total waste production.complete the picture of production trends. P wastes analyzed by the Agronomic Division from 1996
to 2001. However,due to a large amount of variation
The final link in Traditionally,landfillshaveservedas major receptacles in nutrient content,average values are not suffic°"
and groundwater at least annually
y to provide evidence the chain is sample both surface for industrial and municipal waste products. As to guide responsible agronomic use of these materi.that the waste application program is not having a concerns mount over the environment and demand forlandfill space increases,agricultural land has become Waste analysis measures the concentrations ofessential
negative impact on the environment.Overtime,records a primary site for waste disposal.As long as waste plant nutrients in each sample—nitrogen,phosphorus,
of analytical results may prove to be invaluable products are applied at agronomic rates followin best
indicators of responsible waste management and g potassium, calcium, magnesium, sulfur, iron,
environmental stew
management practices, agricultural land is a safe manganese,zinc,•copper and boron.In municipal stewardship. disposal site for most materials. and
industrial wastes,it also measures levels of potentially
For additional information,contact harmful elements,such as cadmium,lead,nickel and
— — Farmers have long recognized the benefits of utilizing sodium. Other useful information—such as ag lime
waste materials to grow crops. Organic residues not equivalence,soluble salts(electrical conductivity)and
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division only provide the full complement of nutrients required pH—is also provided.
Plant/Waste/Solution Section for plant growth but also enhance the soil's nutrient-
and water-holding capacities,aeration and infiltration At a cost of only$4 per sample,waste analysis is a
Physical Location: rate.4300 Reedy Creek Road valuable tool.Clients receive reports in the mail but
Raleigh,NC27607-6465 can also access them online by selecting Find Your
Animal wastes represent a valuable fertilizer resource. Report from the left navigation bar on the Agronomic
�► They can contain significant quantities of major Division's Web site at www.ncagr.com/agronomi.
MailingAddress- nutrients(N,P and K),secondary nutrients(Ca,Mg,
1040 Mail Service Center S)and micronutrients(Fe,Mn,Zn,Cu,B,Mo).North
Raleigh,NC27699-1040 A_ ti=' Table 1. Average plant nutrients available the
Carolina livestock and poultry farms generate enough first year after broadcast application of animal
waste each year to meet a sizeable percentage of the waste"
Phone:[phone] state's fertilizer needs.Unfortunately,the farms that
generate wastes are not well distributed over the state, N Pzoj Kt
or visit our Web site and current technology does not allow economical
www.ncagr.com/agronomi /bsira;:
transport from areas of high intensity to low intensity. BROILER HOUSE LITTER 29.7 28.8 39.0
Prepared by Improving >6,000 samples
NCDA&CS Waste Analysis TURKEY House LITTER 23.7 27.7 25.7
F.Robert(Bobby)Walls, Agricultural Productivity -— �!-- ___ >2,500 samples
BrendaR.Cleveland, The nutrient content of waste products varies widely. —lbs//000 gallons—
and Catherine E.Stokes &Environmental Quality To use them safely and effectively as fertilizer ANAEROBIC SWINE LAGOON 2.1 1.2 4.7
materials,growers should have them analyzed before >38,000 samples
revised May 2002Dept. application.The Agronomic Division's Plant/Waste/ DAIRY MANURE SLURRY 5.2 4.9 10.5
Solution section analyzes liquid and solid waste >1,500 samples
1,500 copies of this public docuinent were printed samples and issues reports that provide detailed
at a cost of$150.94 or$0.10 per copy. 'Data are based on waste analyses conducted from 1996 to 2001.

Sampling Procedures plastic container.Refrigerate samples if they will be Although nutrients are somewhat stabilized in these
ng the sample can expand.Refrigerate samples if they stored for more than two days. materials,leaching of mobile nutrients can occur during
Proper sampling is the key to reliable waste analysis. will be in storage for more than one day. rains. Therefore, sample unprotected compost
Although laboratory procedures are extremely accurate, In-house sampling: Nutrient concentration varies periodically to monitor changes.
they cannot compensate for samples that do not Lagoon liquid: Premixing the lagoon is ideal but widely in poultry litter—both among houses and within
represent the waste product.Submitting a good sample not essential.If the lagoon is atwo-stage system,draw houses. Often,waste from a single house will be LJ Waste Analysis Report
is important because only a very small portion of the samples from the lagoon that will be pumped.Do not collected for application. In such cases, sample the The waste report contains descriptive sample
sample is analyzed in the laboratory. include floating debris and scum in the samples. waste from each house separately.
information,laboratory results,nutrients available
for the first crop, other elements, and
Waste samples should represent the average Take one sample of liquid from each of at least eight Collect waste cores or slices from 10 to 12 locations recommendations.
composition of the material that will be applied. sites around the lagoon.A 10-ft rod with a I-pint per house.Cores or slices should extend from the top
Reliable samples typically consist of material collected container attached to the end serves as a good sampling to the bottom of the accumulated waste.Take samples Laboratory results include concentrations
from a number of locations. Sampling methods vary device.Collect samples at least 6 ft from the edge of around waterers,feeders and brooders in proportion to essential plant nutrients and some potenti:
according to waste types, treatment and storage the lagoon at a depth of about 1 ft.Shallower samples the space these areas occupy in the house. harmful elements in units of parts per million.For
facilities. from an anaerobic lagoon are not acceptable because
composted materials,a pH is determined along with
oxygen transfer near the surface sometimes alters the
Combine the collected material in a plastic container. electrical conductivity or soluble salts. An
Collect and submit waste samples as close to the time chemistry of the solution. Mix it thoroughly.Take a one-pint subsample from this agricultural lime equivalent is calculated for waste
of application as possible.Analytical results from mixture and send it to the laboratory. products that may have neutralizing value.
previous years have minimal value. Nutrient After collecting samples from several sites,mix them
concentrations can change over time,particularly when thoroughly and submit one composite sample to the Below-house sampling: In a high-rise system, Nutrients available for the first crop grown after
wastes are unprotected from the weather. laboratory. manure accumulates below the cage area. Under a
waste application are predicted based on estimates
properly managed system,the manure is fairly uniform of mineralization rate and nutrient loss for the
Rainfall and ambient air pressures can alter nutrient Liquid slurry: Premixing the slurry in a pit or in moisture and appearance.However,if some areas of application method.Therefore,take special care to
levels in an anaerobic lagoon.Likewise,stockpiled storage basin prior to sampling is ideal.Waste should manure differ in appearance,take samples in proportion identify the type of waste and the application method
litter or other wastes change significantly if left be collected from several areas of the pit and from to the size and number of these areas. properly on the information sheet.The report can
unprotected. The composition of municipal and different depths.Mix the samples thoroughly. provide estimates for up to two application methods,
industrial wastes varies with production demands that For example,if 10 percent of the manure differs from thus giving growers the option of which to use.
alter inputs and processing. An 8-to 10-ft section of 0.50-to 0.75-inch pipe can the bulk pile,then take 10 percent of the total sample
be used to collect samples.Insert the pipe into the pit, from those areas. Otherwise, sample randomly
The"Other Elements"section lists amounts of some
A Waste Information sheet(Form AD9)must be filled and then press a thumb over the end to create an air throughout the entire storage area. potentially harmful elements that growers may want
out in as much detail as possible.Six samples may be lock.Remove the pipe from the waste,place it over to monitor—such as sodium,nickel,cadmium and
listed per form.The shaded areas of the information the sampling container and release the air lock. Stockpiled litter: Ideally, stored litter has an lead.Electrical conductivity(soluble salts)and pH
sheet must be completed before samples can be impervious surface beneath it and a cover over it. values prove useful when blending composted
processed.This form is available on the Division's Web Do not rinse the sample into the container because Uncovered waste develops a weathered exterior that wastes into potting soils. An agricultural 1'
site,where it can be filled out and submitted online or this will dilute the nutrient concentrations in the may not accurately represent the majority of the equivalent is calculated for materials that may li.
printed and filled out by hand, sample.However,if water will be added to the waste material. Rainfall moves water-soluble nutrients
prior to application, then addinga proportionate lime value and indicates the amount have
the waste on
P P through the pile.If stockpiled litter is unprotected and a wet basis that must be applied to have the same
Samples should always be submitted in the client's name amount of water to the sample is appropriate. used over an extended period,take new samples before effect as one ton of agricultural lime.
for easy information retrieval. Clients can receive each application.Always sample to a depth of at least
assistance in interpreting results and applying the waste Solid Waste 18 inches at six or more locations. The,report's recommendation section provides
by contacting the NCDA&CS regional agronomist for Solid waste analysis includes an assessment of general information on the waste product,including
their area or the Agronomic Division office in Raleigh. moisture content that al lows nutrient concentrations Surface-scraped waste: Surface-scraped and attention to unusual qualities and quantities of heavy
to be convertedto awet basis after analysis.As a result, piled materials are similarto stockpiled litter.They need metals and other nutrients that must be considered
Liquid Waste it is very important that the sample submitted represent protection from the weather. Follow the same to dispose of the material in an environmentally
Collect a 10-to 16-ounce sample from liquid wastes. the average moisture of the waste product. procedures for taking samples. sound manner.For diagnostic samples,site-specific
Since glass and galvanized metal can contaminate recommendations are provided based on background
samples,plastic containers are most suitable.Leave an Use a shovel,or a specially designed pipe,to take a Composted waste: Use the same storage and
a sampling procedures recommended for stockpiled litter. information.
inch or more of air space in the top of the container so core to a uniform depth.Collect a one-pint sample in

u2s"DANRCS
,,,,,,,'r�t+Y'
$O�klliA
RUSLE2 Profile Erosion Calculation Record
Info:
File: profileslJerry Crawford corn silage, wheat, soybeans all NT
Inputs:
Location: North CarolinalChatham County
Soil: 51 B Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopeslHelena sandy loam 83%
Slope length (horiz): 150 ft
Avg. slope steepness: 4.0 %
Mana ement Ve etation Yield units Yield #of units
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Corn, sila a tons 23.000 CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn sila a/wheat sila a/so beans-all NT Weeds, less than 3 mo growth Ibs 500.00
CMZ 661c.Other Local M t Recordslcorn silage/wheat sila a/so beans-all NT Wheat, winter sila a S.E. tons 11.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat sila a/so beans-all NT Weeds, less than.3 mo rowth Ibs 500.00
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mat Recordslcorn silage/wheat sila a/so beans-all NT Soybean, southern 15-20 in rows Bushels 40.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mrgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Weeds, less than 6 mo growth lbs 1500.0
Contouring: d. relative row grade 2 percent of slope grade
Strips/barriers: (none)
Diversion/terrace, sediment basin: (none)
Subsurface drainage: (none)
Adjust res. burial level: Normal res. burial
Outeuts:
T value: 4.0 t/ac/yr
Soil loss erod. portion: 0.79 t/ac/yr
Detachment on slope: 0.79 t/ac/yr
Soil loss for cons. plan: 0.79 t/ac/yr
Sediment delivery: 0.79 tlaclyr
Crit. slope length: 150 ft
Surf. cover after planting: --%
Date O eration Vegetation Surf. res. cov. after op,
4/10/0 Manures reader, slurry100
5/15/0 Planter double disk o nr w/fluted coulter Com, sila a 93
8/20/0 Harvest, silage 43
8/21/0 Rani weed rowth Weeds, less than 3 mo rowth 43

11/20/0 Kill crop 26
11/2510 Drill or air seeder single disk openers 7-10 in s ac. Wheat, winter sila a S.E. 37
4/20/1 Harvest, silage 36
4/21/1 Begin weed growth Weeds, less than 3 mo rowth 36
412211 Kill cro 36
5/15/1 Planter, narrow slot w/smooth or rippled coulter Soybean, southern 15-20 in rows 34
12/1/1 Harvest, killing crop 50 ct standing stubble 88
12/211 Begin weed growth Weeds, less than 6 mo arowth 88

kek.:zCai
-a" Nn%..s
�i'I'Ritw
35.
RUSLE2 Profile Erosion Calculation Record
Info:
File: profileslJerry Crawford corn silage, wheat, soybeans all NT
Inputs:
Location: North Caro linalChatham County
Soil: 205B Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopeslGeorgeville silt loam 95%
Slope length (horiz): 150 ft
Avg. slope steepness: 4.0 %
Management Vegetation Yield units Yield #of units
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Corn, silage tons 23.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Weeds, less than 3 mo growth Ibs 500.00
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Wheat, winter silage S.E. tons 11.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Weeds, less than 3 mo qIrowth Ibs 500.00
CMZ 661c.Other Local Wit Recordslcorn sila a/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT So bean, southern 15-20 in rows Bushels 40.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local M_ tctRRecordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT I Weeds, less than 6 mo growth Ibs 1500.0
Contouring: d. relative row grade 2 percent of slope grade
Strips/barriers: (none)
Diversion/terrace, sediment basin: (none)
Subsurface drainage: (none)
Adjust res. burial level: Normal res. burial
Outputs:
T value: 4.0 t/ac/yr
Soil loss erod. portion: 1.4 t/ac/yr
Detachment on slope: 1.4 t/ac/yr
Soil loss for cons. plan: 1.4 t/ac/yr
Sediment delivery: 1.4 t/ac/yr
Crit. slope length: 150 ft
Surf. cover after planting: --%
Date Operation Vegetation Sunf res. cov. after op, %
4/10/0 Manures reader, slurry 100
5/15/0 Planter, double disk o nr w/fluted coulter Corn, silage 93
8/20/0 Harvest, silage 43
8/21/0 Begin weed growth Weeds, less than 3 mo growth 43

11i20/0 Fill Crop 26.
11/25/0 Drill or air seeder single disk openers 7-10 ins ac. Wheat winter silage S.E. 37
4/20/1 Harvest, silage 36
4/21/1 Begin weed growth Weeds, less than 3 mo growth 36
4/22/1 Kill crop 36
5/15/1 Planter, narrow slot w/smooth or rippled coulter Soybean, southern 15-20 in rows 34
12/1/1 Harvest killing crop 50 t standing stubble 88
12/2/1 Begin weed growth Weeds, less than 6 mo growth 88

us A 1 ■RCS,',,',,,,
_ Cf.SL..Cti ,
Scrui�e
RUSLE2 Profile Erosion Calculation Record
Info:
File: profileslJerry Crawford corn silage, wheat, soybeans all NT
Inputs:
Location: North CarolinalChatham County
Soil: 205132 Georgeville silty clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately erodedlGeorgeville silty clay loam 88%
Slope length (horiz): 150 ft
Avg. slope steepness: 4.0 %
Management Ve etation Yield units Yield #of units)
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn sila a/wheat sila a/so beans-all NT Corn, silage tons 23.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Weeds less than 3 mo rowth Ibs 500.00
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Wheat, winter silage S.E. tons 11.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Weeds, less than 3 mo growth Ibs 500.00
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Soybean, southern 15-20 in rows Bushels 40.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all a/so beans-all NT Weeds, less than 6 mo growth lbs 1500.0
Contouring: d. relative row grade 2 percent of slope grade
Strips/barriers: (none)
Diversion/terrace, sediment basin: (none)
Subsurface drainage: (none)
Adjust res. burial level: Normal res. burial
Outputs:
T value: 4.0 t/ac/yr
Soil loss erod. portion: 1.6 t/ac/yr
Detachment on slope: 1.6 t/ac/yr
Soil loss for cons. plan: 1.6 t/ac/yr
Sediment delivery: 1.6 t/ac/yr
Crit. slope length: 150 ft
Surf. cover after planting: --%
Date Operation Vegetation Surf res. cov. after op, %
4/1010 Manures reader, slurry 100
5/15/0 Planter, double disk o nr w/fluted coulter Corn silage 93
8/20/0 Harvest, silage 43
8/21/0 Be in weed growth Weeds, less than 3 mo growth 43

11/20/0 Kill crop 26
11/25/0 Drill or air seeder single disk openers 7-10 ins ac. Wheat, winter silage S.E. 37
4/20/1 Harvest silage 36
4/21/1 Begin weed growth Weeds less than 3 mo growth 36
4/22/1 Kill crop 36
5/15/1 Planter, narrow slot w/smooth or rippled coulter Soybean, southern 15-20 in rows 34
12/1/1 Harvest, killing crop 50pct standing stubble 88
12/2/1 Begin weed growth Weeds, less than 6 mo growth 88

u F.v4fi%xl:�i
E,-1,"YJtl:•
Srlvitr,
RUSLE2 Profile Erosion Calculation Record
Info:
File: profileslJerry Crawford corn silage, wheat, soybeans all NT
Inputs:
Location: North CarolinalChatham County
Soil: 205C Georgeville silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopeslGeorgeville silt loam 97%
Slope length (horiz): 150 ft
Avg. slope steepness: 6.0 %
Management Vegetation EYieldnits Yield #of unitsCMZ 661c.Other Local M t Recordslcorn sila a/wheat sila a/so beans-all NT Corn, sila a 23.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local M t Recordslcorn sila a/wheat sila a/so beans-all NT Weeds less than 3 mo rowth 500.00
CMZ 661c.Other Local M t Recordslcorn sila a/wheat sila a/so beans-all NT Wheat, winter sila a S.E. 11.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Weeds, less than 3 mo growth IDS 500.00
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn sila a/wheat silage/soybeans-all-NT So- bean, southern 15-20 in rows Bushels 40.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat sila a/so beans-all NT Weeds, less than 6 mo growth Ibs 1500.0
Contouring: d. relative row grade 2 percent of slope grade
Strips/barriers: (none)
Diversion/terrace, sediment basin: (none)
Subsurface drainage: (none)
Adjust res. burial level: Normal res. burial
Outputs:
T value: 4.0 t/ac/yr
Soil loss erod. portion: .1.9 t/ac/yr
Detachment on slope: 1.9 t/ac/yr
Soil loss for cons. plan: 1.9 t/ac/yr
Sediment delivery: 1.9 t/ac/yr
Crit. slope length: 150 ft
Surf. cover after planting: --%
Date Operation Ve etation Sun`. res. cov. after o ,
4/10/0 Manures reader, slygy 100
5/15/0 Planter, double disk o nr w/fluted coulter Corn, silage 93
8/20/0 Harvest, silage 8/21/0 43
Be in weed rowth Weeds, less than 3 mo growth 43

1 1/20/0 Kill cro 26
11/25/0 Drill or air seeder single disk openers 7-10 ins ac. Wheat, winter silage S.E. 37
4/20/1 Harvest, silage 36
4121/1 Begin weed growth Weeds, less than 3 mo rowth 36
4/22/1 Kill crop 36
5/15/1 Planter, narrow slot w/smooth or rippied coulter Soybean, southern 15-20 in rows 34
12/1/1 Harvest, killing crop 50 ct standing stubble 88
12/2/1 Begin weed growth Weeds less than 6 mo orowth 88

USDr r SELF!
tntESF."CaER:..
u=DANRCSimricry
RUSLE2 Profile Erosion Calculation Record
Info:
File: profileslJerry Crawford corn silage, wheat, soybeans all NT
Inputs:
Location: North CarolinalChatham County
Soil: 212B Herndon silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopeslHerndon silt loam 68%
Slope length (horiz): 150 ft
Avg. slope steepness: 4.0 %
Mana ement Vey etation Yield units Yield(#of units
F
61c.Other Local M t Recordslcorn silage/wheat a/wheat sila a/so beans-all NT Corn, silage tons 23.000
61c.Other Local M t Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Weeds, less than 3 mo growth Ibs 500.00
61c.Other Local M t Recordslcorn sila a/wheat sila a/so beans-all NT Wheat, winter sila a S.E. tons 11.000
61c.Other Local Mat
Recordslcorn sila a/wheat sila a/so beans-all NT Weeds, less than 3 mo growth Ibs 500.00
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat a/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT So'bean, southern 15-20 r rows Bushels 40.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Weeds, less than 6 mo rowth Ibs 1500.0
Contouring: d..relative row grade 2 percent of slope grade
Strips/barriers: (none)
Diversion/terrace, sediment basin: (none)
Subsurface drainage: .(none)
Adjust res. burial level: Normal res. burial
Ouut.puts:
T value: 5.0 t/ac/yr
Soil loss erod. portion: 1.4 t/ac/yr
Detachment on slope: 1.4 Vac/yr
Soil loss for cons. plan: 1.4 t/ac/yr
Sediment delivery: 1.4 t/ac/yr
Crit. slope length: 150 ft
Surf. cover after planting: -- %
Date O eration Vegetation Surf. res. cov.Mop,4/10/0 Manures reader, slur 10
5/15/0 Planter, double disk o nr w/fluted coulter Corn, silage 93
8/20/0 Harvest, sila a 43
8/21/0 Begin weed growth Weeds, less than 3 mo growth 43

11/20/0 Kill crop 26
11/25/0 Drill or air seeder sin le disk o ners 7-10 in s ac. Wheat, winter sila e S.E. 37
4/20/1 Harvest, silage 36
4/21/1 Begin weed growth Weeds, less than 3 mo row
th 36
4/22/1 Kill cro . 36
5/15/1 Planter, narrow slot w/smooth or rippled coulter Soybean, southern 15-20 in rows 34
12/1/1 Harvest, killin cro 50 ct standin stubble 88
121211 Begin weed growth Weeds, less than 6 mo rowth 88

USDA N t "''"�
�� F.i,•v._rtul
RUSLE2 Profile Erosion Calculation Record
Info:
File: profileslJerry Crawford corn silage, wheat, soybeans all NT
Inputs:
Location: North CarolinalChatham County
Soil: 33B Cecil gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopeslCecil gravelly sandy loam 99%
Slope length (horiz): 150 ft
Avg. slope steepness: 4.0 %
Management Vegetation Yield units Yield(#of units
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Corn, silage tons 23.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn sila a/wheat sila a/so beans-all NT Weeds, less than 3 mo growth Ibs 500.00
CMZ 661c.Other Local M t Recordslcorn sila e/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Wheat, winter silage S.E. tons 11.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat sila a/so beans-all NT Weeds, less than 3 mo growth Ibs 500.00
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT So bean, southern 15-20 in rows Bushels 40.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat sila a/so beans-all NT Weeds, less than 6 mo growth 1500.0
Ibs
Contouring: d. relative row grade 2 percent of slope grade
Strips/barriers: (none)
Diversion/terrace, sediment basin: (none)
Subsurface drainage: (none)
Adjust res. burial level: Normal res. burial
outputs:
T value: 4.0 t/ac/yr
Soil loss erod. portion: 0.90 t/ac/yr
Detachment on slope: 0.90 t/ac/yr
Soil loss for cons. plan: 0.90 t/ac/yr
Sediment delivery: 0.90 t/ac/yr
Crit. slope length: 150 ft
Surf. cover after planting: --%
Date Operation Vegetation Sun` res. cov. after o , %
4/10/0 Manures reader, slurry 100
5/15/0 Planter, double disk o nr w/fluted coulter Corn, silage 93
8/20/0 Harvest, silage 43
8/21/0 Begin weed growth Weeds less than 3 mo growth 43

11/20/0 kill cro 26
11/25/0 Drill or air seeder single disk o eners 7-10 ins ac. Wheat, winter silage S.E. 3
4/20/1 Harvest, silage
366
4/21/1 Begin weed growth Weeds, less than 3 mo growth 36
4/22/1 Kill crop 36
5/15/1 Planter, narrow slot w/smooth or rippled coulter Soybean, southern 15-20 in rows 34
12/1/1 Harvest, killing crop 50 ct standin stubble 88
1212/1 Begin weed growth I Weeds, less than 6 mo growth 88

UJLJ/1 r0nutvl
tiYlYl(iF
E71-1
RUSLE2 Profile Erosion Calculation Record
Info:
File: profileslJerry Crawford corn silage, wheat, soybeans all NT
Inputs:
Location: North CarolinalChatham County
Soil: 37B Wedowee sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopeslWedowee sandy loam 80%
Slope length (horiz): 150 ft
Avg. slope steepness: 3.0 %
F Management Vegetation Yield units Yield(#of units)
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Corn, silage tons 23.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Weeds, less than 3 mo growth Ibs 500.00
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat sila a/so beans-all NT Wheat winter silage S.E. tons 11.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat sila a/so beans-all NT Weeds less than 3 mo growth Ibs 500.00
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat sila a/so beans-all NT Soybean, southern 15-20 in rows Bushels 40.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Weeds, less than 6 mo growth Ibs 1500.0
Contouring: d. relative row grade 2 percent of slope grade
Strips/barriers: (none)
Diversion/terrace, sediment basin: (none)
Subsurface drainage: (none)
Adjust res. burial level: Normal res. burial
Outputs:
T value: 4.0 t/ac/yr
Soil loss erod. portion: 0.61 Vac/yr
Detachment on slope: 0.61 t/ac/yr
Soil loss for cons. plan: 0.61 t/ac/yr
Sediment delivery: 0.61.t/ac/yr
Crit. slope length: 150 ft
Surf. cover after planting: --%
Date Operation Vegetation Surf res, cov. after op, %
4/10/0 Manures reader, slurry 100
5/15/0 Planter, double disk o nr w/fluted coulter Corn, sila,l e 93
8/20/0 Harvest, silage 43
8/21/0 Begin weed growth Weeds, less than 3 mo rowth 43

11112010 Kill crop 76'
11/25/0 Drill or air seeder single disk openers 7-10 ins ac. Wheat, winter silage S.E. 37
4/20/1 Harvest, silage 36
4/21/1 Begin weed growth Weeds, less than 3 mo growth 36
4/22/1 Kill crop 36
5/15/1 Planter, narrow slot w/smooth or rippled coulter Soybean, southern 15-20 in rows 34
12/1/1 Harvest, killing crop 50pct standing stubble 88
121211 Begin weed growth Weeds, less than 6 mo growth 88

Us"DANRCS,,,'A,.,
RUSLE2 Profile Erosion Calculation Record
Info:
File: profileslJerry Crawford corn silage, wheat, soybeans all NT
Inputs:
Location: North CarolinalChatham County
Soil: 130E Nanford-Badin complex, 2 to 6 percent slopeslNanford silt loam 36%
Slope length (horiz): 150 ft
Avg. slope steepness: 4.0 %
Management Ve etation Yield units Yield #of units
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/so beans-all NT Corn sila a tons 23.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn sila a/wheat sila a/so beans-all NT Weeds, less than 3 mo growl Ibs 500.00
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Wheat, winter sila a S.E. tons 11.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Weeds, less than 3 mo growth Ibs 500.00
CMZ 661c.Other Local M t Recordslcorn silage/wheat sila a/so beans-all NT So bean, southern 15-20 in rows Bushels 40.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Weeds, less than 6 mo growth Ibs 1500.0
Contouring: d. relative row grade 2 percent of slope grade
Strips/barriers: (none)
Diversion/terrace, sediment basin: (none)
Subsurface drainage: (none)
Adjust res. burial level: Normal res. burial
Outputs:
T value: 4.0 t/ac/yr
Soil loss erod. portion: 1.4 t/ac/yr
Detachment on slope: 1.4 t/ac/yr
Soil loss for cons. plan: 1.4 t/ac/yr
Sediment delivery: 1.4 t/ac/yr
Crit. slope length: 150 ft
Surf. cover after planting: --%
Date Operation Vegetation Surf. res. cov. after o , %
4/10/0 Manures reader, slurry 100
5/15/0 Planter, double disk o nr w/fluted coulter Corn, sila a 93
8/20/0 Harvest, silage 43
8/21/0 Begin weed growth Weeds, less than 3 mo growth 43

11/2010 Kill crop 26
11/25/0 Drill or air seeder single disk openers 7-10 in s ac. Wheat, winter silage S.E. 37
4/20/1 Harvest, silage 36
4/21/1 Begin weed growth Weeds, less than 3 mo growth 36
4/22/1 Kill crop 36
5/15/1 Planter, narrow slot w/smooth or rippled coulter Soybean, southern 15-20 in rows 34
12/1/1 Harvest, killing crop 50pct standing stubble 88
12/2/1 Be in weed growth Weeds, less than 6 mo rowth 88

uQ` R
�
CS,',,'n',
RUSLE2 Profiile Erosion Calculation Record
Info:
File: profileslJerry Crawford corn silage, wheat, soybeans all NT
Inputs:
Location: North CarolinalChatham County
Soil: 130C Nanford-Badin complex, 6 to 10 percent slopeslNanford silt loam 50%
Slope length (horiz): 150 ft
Avg. slope steepness: 6.0 %
Management Vegetation Yield units Yield(#of units
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Corn, silage tons 23.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Weeds, less than 3 mo growth Ibs 500.00
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Wheat,winter silage S.E. tons 11.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Weeds, less than 3 mo growth Ibs 500.00
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT _Soybean, southern 15-20 in rows Bushels 40.000
CMZ 661c.Other Local Mgt Recordslcorn silage/wheat silage/soybeans-all NT Weeds, less than 6 mo growth Ibs 1500.0
Contouring: d. relative row grade 2 percent of slope grade
Strips/barriers: (none)
Diversion/terrace, sediment basin: (none)
Subsurface drainage: (none)
Adjust res. burial level: Normal res. burial
Outputs:
T value: 4.0 t/ac/yr
Soil loss erod. portion: 2.0 t/ac/yr
Detachment on slope: 2.0 t/ac/yr
Soil loss for cons. plan: 2.0 t/ac/yr
Sediment delivery: 2.0 t/ac/yr
Crit. slope length: 150 ft
Surf. cover after planting: --%
Date Operation Vegetation Surf. res. cov. after o , %
4/10/0 Manures reader, slurry 100
5/15/0 Planter, double disk o nr w/fluted coulter Corn, silage 93
8/20/0 Harvest, silage 43
8/21/0 Begin weed growth Weeds, less than 3 mo growth 43

11/20/0 Kill cro 26
11/25/0 Drill or air seeder single disk openers 7-10 in spac. Wheat, winter silage S.E. 37
4/20/1 Harvest, silage 36
4/21/1 Begin weed growth Weeds, less than 3 mo growth 36
4/22/1 Kill crop 36
5/15/1 Planter, narrow slot w/smooth or rippled coulter Soybean, southern 15-20 in rows 34
12/1/1 Harvest, killing crop 50 ct standing stubble 88
12/2/1 Begin weed growth Weeds, less than 6 mo growth 88

CANAT Version: 1 .95
P.JAT Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 9:29: 47 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2007
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
Tract Number: 2346
Field Number: 1
Soil Series : WeB: Wedowee sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Crop: Fescue (Pasture) .
BMPs : Vegetative Buffer Width = 10 ft.
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 100 ft.
Fertilizers : Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 9. 6 1000 gal
Lb P205: 6. 7 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Soil Loss: 1 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 10-19 ft
Sail Test 0" - 4" 125
WV—Factor (USER) 1.21
F._�drologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 1
SOLUBLE P = 1
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 4
TOTAL P RATING = 6 (LOW)

%NAT Version: 1 . 95
�T Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 9: 31: 19 AM
INPUTS
Lendar Year: 2007
.inty: Chatham
)d.ucer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
ict Number: 2346
31d Number: 2
U Series: WeB: Wedowee sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
gyp : Fescue (Pasture) .
?s : Vegetative Buffer Width = 15 ft.
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 100 ft.
=tilizers : Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 9. 6 1000 gal
Lb P205: 6. 7 lb
Application Method: All other surface
3lications
L1 Loss : 1 t/ac/yr
:�eiving Slope Distance 10-19 ft
Ll Test 0" - 4" 139
WV—Factor (USER) 0. 8
irologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
=CULATE P = 2
IUBLE P = 2
zCHATE P = 0
1,RCE P = 4
FAL P RATING = 8 (LOW)

_.:ANAT Version: 1 .95
r 'JAT Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 9: 33: 16 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2007
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
Tract Number: 2358
F _eld Number: 1
Soil Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Crop: Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
BMPs : Vegetative Buffer . Width = 10 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 25. 86 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 6.7 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Soil Loss : 9 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 0-9 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 71
WV—Factor (USER) 0. 98
^vdrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 28
SOLUBLE P = 1
iEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 17
":'OTAL P RATING = 46 (MEDIUM)

kNAT Version: 1 . 95
%T' Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 9:37 : 16 AM
INPUTS
lendar Year: 2007
_in.ty: Chatham
3d.ucer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
act Number: 2358
31d Number: 2
it Series: HrB: Herndon silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
gyp: Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Ps : Vegetative Buffer Width = 10 ft.
rrilizers : Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 25. 86 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 6.7 lb
Application Method: All other surface
alications
it Loss : 8 t/ac/yr
2eiving Slope Distance 10-19 ft
it Test 0" - 4" 71
WV Factor (USER) . 98
xrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
< ICULATE P = 19
r TIBLE P = 1
nrHATE P = 0
JRCE P = 17
ikL P RATING = 37 (MEDIUM)

.,-:'-ANAT Version: 1. 95
7:;1AT Results For: Chatham 4/19/2007 3: 52: 03 PM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2007
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
Tract Number: 2359
Field Number: 1
Soil Series : NaB: Nanford-Badin complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Crop: Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
SMPs : Vegetative Buffer Width = 10 ft.
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 100 ft.
Fertilizers : Dairy-slurry .
Yearly Applied Amount: 8 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 6. 7 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Soil Loss : 9 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 10-19 ft
Gail Test 0" - 4" 246
WV Factor (USER) 1 . 1
Artificial Drainage System: NO
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 30
c�(_)LUBLE P = 9
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 10
TOTAL P RATING = 49 (MEDIUM)

FAT Version: 1 .95
i' Results For: Chatham 4/20/2007 8: 50: 07 AM
INPUTS
Iendar Year: 2007
�In.ty: Chatham
Dducer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
act Number: 2359
-3l.d Number: 2
il. Series : GeB2 : Georgeville silty clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes,
Jerately eroded
DrD: Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Ps; : Vegetative Buffer Width = 10 ft.
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 100 ft.
rtilizers : Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 3. 49 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 6. 7 lb
Application Method: All other surface
olications
i]. Loss : 8 t/ac/yr
veiving Slope Distance 10-19 ft
11 Test 0" - 4" 268
:1V Factor (USER) 1 .03
_4r7ologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
RTICULATE P = 70
LUBLE P = 5
4-CHATE P = 0
,JRCE P = 2
IAL P RATING = 77 (HIGH)

':.'ANAT Version: 1 .95
!. T.,AT Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 9: 46: 52 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2007
County Chatham
Producer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
Tract Number: 2530
Field Number: 1
Soil Series : HeB: Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Crop: Fescue (Pasture) :
BMPs : Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 100 ft.
Fertilizers : Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 11. 62 1000 gal
Lb P205: 6.7 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Soil Loss : 1 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 10-19 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 196
WV Factor (USER) 1
Artificial Drainage System: NO
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P 1
SOLUBLE P = 17
yLACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 12
TOTAL P RATING = 30 (MEDIUM)

":NAT Version: 1 .95
�.T Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 9: 48 : 14 AM
INPUTS
le:ndar Year: 2007
'Inty: Chatham
Dducer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
act Number: 2530
=_l.d Number: 2
il. Series: HeB: Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
3p: Fescue (Pasture) :
Ps : Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 100 ft.
rt.ilizers : Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 11 . 62 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 6.7 lb
Application Method: All other surface
olications
il. Loss : 1 t/ac/yr
zeiving Slope Distance 10-19 ft
i1 Test 0" - 4" 196
WV Factor (USER) 1
ti.ficial Drainage System: NO
jrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
DTICULATE P = 1
- 7BLE P = 17
ACHATE P = 0
DRCE P = 12
TAL P RATING = 30 (MEDIUM)

;ANAT Version: 1 . 95
= :JAT Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 9: 50 :31 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2007
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
Tract Number: 2530
Feld Number: 3
Soil Series: HeB: Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Crop: Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
BMPs : Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft..
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 100 ft.
rertilizers: Dairy-slurry .
Yearly Applied Amount: 17.7 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 6.7 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Sail Loss : 5 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 100-149 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 135
WV Factor (USER) 1
rtificial Drainage System: NO
..ydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
i'=kRTICULATE P = 1
-SOLUBLE P = 14
LLACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P. = 22
TOTAL P RATING = 37 (MEDIUM)

'!'AT Version: 1 . 95
`:T Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 9: 51: 48 AM
INPUTS
lendar Year: 2007
anty: Chatham
ad.ucer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
act Number: 2530
ald Number: 6
i1 Series: CeB: Cecil gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
)p : Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
�'S : Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
etilizers : Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 23. 82 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 6. 7 lb
Application Method: All other surface
.Iications
it Loss: 5 t/ac/yr
eiving Slope Distance 10-19 ft
iI Test 0" - 4" 237
W'V_Factor (USER) 1 . 07
aiologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
{TICULATE P = 18
1,UBLE P = 4
;_C:HATE P = 0
jRCE P = 12
rAL P RATING = 34 (MEDIUM)

i;-;ANAT Version: 1 . 95
PLAT Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 9: 52 : 48 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2007
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
Tract Number: 2530
F__eld Number: 7
Soil Series : CeB: Cecil gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Crop: Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
BMPs : Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Fertilizers : Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 23. 82 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 6.7 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Soil Loss : 5 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 10-19 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 292
WV Factor (USER) 1 . 01
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
L, kRTICULATE P = 23
�OLUBLE P = 5
L EACHATE P = 0
_OURCE P = 12
TOTAL P RATING = 40 (MEDIUM)

kNAT Version: 1 . 95
as Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 9: 53: 55 AM
INPUTS
lendar Year: 2007
znty: Chatham
Aucer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
act. Number: 2530
sld Number: 8
U Series : CeB: Cecil gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
aF: Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
?s : Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 30 ft.
=tilizers: Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 23. 82 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 6. 7 lb
Application Method: All other surface
Aications
it Loss : 8 t/ac/yr
=eiving Slope Distance 10-19 ft
it Test 0" - 4" 292
'VvV_Factor (USER) 1 .01
irologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
?TICULATE P = 28
'j"BLE P = 5
�CHATE P = O
jR.CE P = 12
'AL P RATING = 45 (MEDIUM)

-:ANAT Version: 1. 95
F :�AT Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 9: 55: 13 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2007
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
Tract Number: 2530
Field Number: 9
Sail Series: HeB: Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Ci:op- Fescue (Pasture) .
BMPs : Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 100 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 11 . 62 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 6. 7 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Sail Loss: 1 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 10-19 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 292
WV Factor (USER) 1. 01
A-tificial Drainage System: NO
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 1
SOLUBLE P = 25
LEACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 12
TOTAL P RATING = 38 (MEDIUM)

�JdAT Version: 1 . 95
kT Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 9: 56: 42 AM
INPUTS
lendar Year: 2007
inty: Chatham
)d.ucer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
sct Number: 2530
old Number: 10
it Series : NaB: Nanford-Badin complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes
jp : Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
23 : Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 50 ft.
=tilizers: Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 23. 17 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 6. 7 lb
Application Method: All other surface
:)lications
it Loss: 8 t/ac/yr
�eiving Slope Distance 10-19 ft
it Test 0" - 4" 116
'W"V Factor (USER) 1 . 04
wificial Drainage System: NO
irologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
.1'ICULATE P = 15
12TJBLE P = 5
-:HATE P = 0
jRCE P = 29
PAL P RATING = 49 (MEDIUM)

NCANAT Version: 1. 95
FLAT Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 9:58 : 30 AM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2007
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
Tract Number: 2530 .
Field Number: 11
Soil Series: CeB: Cecil gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Crop: Fescue (Pasture) .
Bi�IPs : Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 15.15 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 6. 7 lb
Application Method: All other surface
applications
Soil Loss: 1 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 10-19 ft
Sail Test 0" - 4" 123
WV Factor (USER) 0:79
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
PARTICULATE P = 3
`i)LUBLE P = 2
_EACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 5
TOTAL P RATING = 10 (LOW)

NAT Version: 1. 95
T Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 2 :21: 39 PM
INPUTS
endar Year: 2007
ni-y; Chatham
ducer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
ct Number: 2530
ld Number: 12
1 Series : CeB: Cecil gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
p.: Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
S ; Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 100 ft.
-t.ilizers: Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 23. 82 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 6.7 lb
Application Method: All other surface
)lications
1 Loss : 8 t/ac/yr
:eiving Slope Distance 20-29 ft
1 Test 0" - 4" 135
WV-Factor (USER) 1
irologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
?TICULATE P = 8
jliBLE P = 2
iCHATE P = 0
JRCE P = 12
i'aL P RATING = 22 (LOW)

NICANAT Version:. 1. 95
PLAT Results For:. Chatham 4/18/2007 2:23:21 PM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2007
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
Tract Number: 2530
Field .Number: 13
Soil Series: CeB: Cecil gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Crop: Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
BMPs: Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Fertilizers : Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 23. 82 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 6. 7 lb
applications Application Method: All other surface
Soil Loss: 8 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 10-19 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 116
WV_Factor (USER) 1 .04
'Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
rARTICULATE P = 14
:JLUBLE P = 2
LrACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 12
TJTAL P RATING = 28 (MEDIUM)

'ar�T Version: 1 .95
7 Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 2 :25: 13 PM
INPUTS
endar Year: 2007
nty: Chatham
ducer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
cE-_ Number: 2533
ld Number: 1
1 Series: GeB2 : Georgeville silty clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes,
e:rately eroded
p : Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
s ; Vegetative Buffer Width = 20 ft.
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 100 ft.
-tilizers : Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 25. 86 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 6.7 lb
Application Method: All other surface
)I ications
.1 Loss : 9 t/ac/yr
:eiving Slope Distance 10-19 ft
_1 Test 0" - 4" 84
'WV-Factor (USER) 0 . 97
rologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
ij'ICULATE P = 26
'UBLE P = 2
^CHATS P = 0
J7RCE P = 17
!1AL P RATING = 45 (MEDIUM)

'.1CANAT Version: 1 . 95
-'LAT Results For: Chatham 4/19/2007 3: 50:36 PM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2007
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
Tract Number: 2533
Field Number: 2
Soil Series : GeB2: Georgeville silty clay loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
Crop: Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
F.MPs: Vegetative Buffer Width = 10 ft.
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 50 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 8 1000 gal
Lb P205: 6.7 lb
applications Application Method: All other surface
Soil Loss: 9 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 10-19 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 84
WV_Factor (USER) 0. 97
" ydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
%RTICULATE P = 33
;,.)LUBLE P = 2
ACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 5
'10TAL P RATING = 40 (MEDIUM)

JA Version: 1 .95
?' Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 2 :28 : 54 PM
INPUTS
endar Year: 2007
nty: Chatham
ducer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
ct Number: 312
-ld Number: 1
1 Series: GaC: Georgeville silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
,p: Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Is : Vegetative Buffer Width = 50 ft.
-tilizers: Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 12. 63 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 6.7 lb
Application Method: All other surface
rlications
.1 Loss : 8 t/ac/yr
:eiving Slope Distance 10-19 ft
_1 Test 0" - 4" 176
WV-Factor (USER) 1 . 17
iiologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
:'`ICULATE P = 19
RUBLE P = 3
kCHATE P = 0
JrRCE P = 8
rAL P RATING = 30 (MEDIUM)

NCANAT Version: 1 .95
?LAT Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 2 :30: 15 PM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2007
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
Tract Number: 312
Field Number: 2
Soil Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Crop: Fescue (Pasture)
BMPs : Vegetative Buffer. Width = 25 ft.
r'ertilizers: Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 12 . 63 1000 gal
Lb P205: 6. 7 lb
applications Application Method: All other surface
Soil Loss: l t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 10-19 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 176
WV Factor (USER) 1 . 17
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
ZARTICULATE P = 3
vOLUBLE P = 2
-EACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 6
TOTAL P RATING 11 (LOW)

,%',T Version: 1 . 95
Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 2:31 : 31 PM
INPUTS
endar Year: 2007
nt.y: Chatham
ducer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
cr_ Number: 312
Id Number: 3
1 Series: GaC: Georgeville silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
p : Fescue (Pasture)
5 : Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
t.ilizers: Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 12 . 63 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 6. 7 lb
Application Method: All other surface
dications
1 Loss: 1 t/ac/yr
:eiving Slope Distance 0-9 ft
.1 Test 0" - 4" 104
WV—Factor (USER) 1 . 06
1rologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
k ICULATE P = 2
LUBLE P = 1
y�HATE P = 0
URCE P = 6
"AL P RATING = 9 (LOW)

NCANAT Version: 1 . 95
PLAT Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 2:35:29 PM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2007
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
Tract Number: 312
Field Number: 4
Soil Series : GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Crop: Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
BMPs : Vegetative Buffer Width = 10 ft.
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Fertilizers: Dairy-slurry.
Yearly Applied Amount: 25. 86 1000 gal
Lb P205: 6. 7 lb
applications Application Method: All other surface
Soil Loss: 8 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 10-19 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 97
WV—Factor (USER) 1 . 07
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
:ARTICULATE P = 14
ZOLUBLE P = 2
'-,EACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 17
TOTAL P RATING = 33 (MEDIUM)

U-IT Version: 1 . 95
Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 2: 36:48 PM
INPUTS
eridar Year: 2007
nty: Chatham
ducer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
c Number: 312
ld Number: 5
1 Series : GaC: Georgeville silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
p : Fescue (Pasture) .
s : Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 50 ft.
t:Llizers: Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 12 . 63 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 6.7 lb
Application Method: All other surface
l.ications
1 Loss : 1 t/ac/yr
:eiving Slope Distance 10-19 ft
1 Test 0" - 4" 52
WV—Factor (USER) 0 .98
Irologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
ZTICULATE P = 1
,UBLE P = 1
�CHATE P = 0
-F:CE P = 6
SAL P RATING = 8 (LOW)

IJCANAT Version: 1 .95
:PLAT Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 2 : 38:22 PM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2007,
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
Tract Number: 312
Field Number: 6
Soil Series : GaC: Georgeville silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Crop: Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage high residue
BMPs: Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Fertilizers : Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 25. 86 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 6. 7 lb
applications Application Method: All other surface
Soil Loss : 8 t/ac/yr
Receiving Slope Distance 0-9 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 97
WV_Factor (USER) 1 . 07
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
� kRTICULATE P = 17
SOLUBLE P = 2
L1 ACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 17
TOTAL P RATING = `�36 (MEDIUM)

iAT Version: 1.95
' Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 2 : 40 :06 PM
INPUTS
�ndar Year: 2007
-ity: Chatham
Ju.cer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
::t Number: 312
Ld Number: 7
1 Series: GaB: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
o: Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
5 ; Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
ti_lizers : Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 25. 96 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 6.7 lb
Application Method: All other surface
Iications
1 Loss : 8 t/ac/yr
e-iving Slope Distance 0-9 ft
1 Test 0" - 4" 97
WV-Factor (USER) 1 . 07
rologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
"1`ICULATE P = 17
,UBLE P = 2
kCHATE P = 0
JIRCE P = 17
"'L P RATING = 36 (MEDIUM)

NCANAT Version: 1 .95
_SLAT Results For: Chatham 4/18/2007 2: 41 :10 PM
INPUTS
Calendar Year: 2007
County: Chatham
Producer Identifier: Jerry Crawford
Tract Number: 312
Field Number: 8
Soil Series: GaC: Georgeville silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Crop: Fescue (Pasture) :
EMPs : Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Fertilizers : Dairy-slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 12 . 63 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 6.7 lb
applications Application Method: All other surface
Soil Loss : 1 t/ac/yr
P.eceiving Slope Distance 0-9 ft
Soil Test 0" - 4" 104
WV_Factor (USER) 1. 1
Hydrologic Condition: GOOD
OUTPUTS
ARTICULATE P = 2
"OLUBLE P = 1
T_E'ACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 6
9 (-LOW-
- OTAL P RATING =