20240269 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20240213

DW R
DHlsloo of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
October 2, 2023 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only If needed.
Does this project involve maintenance dredging funded by the Shallow Draft Navigation Channel Dredging and Aquatic Weed Fund or involve the distribution or transmission of energy or
fuel, including natural gas, diesel, petroleum, or electricity?
Yes No
BIMS # Assigned Version# *
20240269 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Weldon
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Deborah Shirley
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
2/13/2024
Nearest Body of Water
Beaverdam Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C;NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.825116
A. Processing Information
Is this project connected with ARPA funding?
Yes No
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Longitude:
-78.467612
What amount is owed?*
$240.00
$323.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Zachary Thomas:zachary.thomas
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
$570.00
$767.00
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No

1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
NWP 18-SCM fill
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
29 - Residential Developments
18 - Minor Discharges
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? *
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
fig. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
1e. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Dement Farms, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB:017010, DP:02347
2c. Contact Person:
Russell W. Dement III
2d. Address
Street Address
717 N. 1 st Ave
Address Line 2
City Stale / Province / Region
Knightdale NC
Postal/Zip Code Country
27545 USA
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Ric Rojas
3b. Business Name:
DRB Group North Carolina, LLC
3c.Address
Street Address
3000 RDU Center Dr
Address Line 2
Suite 202
city
State / Province / Region
Morrisville
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27560
USA
3d. Telephone Number: 3e. Fax Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Deborah Shirley
4b. Business Name:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
4c.Address
Street Address
8412 Falls of Neuse Road
Address Line 2
Suite 104
City
State / Province / Region
Raleigh
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27516
USA
4d. Telephone Number: 4e. Fax Number:
[phone] [phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality / town:
Knightdale
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
1755-75-7607
2b. Property size:
Approximately 44 acres
O

2c. Project Address
Street Address
0 Lucas Road
Address Line 2
city
Knightdale
Postal / Zip Code
27545
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:
Beaverdam Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:
QNSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010705
4. Project Description and History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
Existing conditions consist of one parcel that is primarily wooded. There are two streams, A is Beaverdam Creek, B and six wetlands (W1, W3-W7) within the project boundary. This
property is north of Horton Road. General land use in the vicinity consists of rural residential, wooded and agricultural land.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 0.932 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
Approximately 2,679 linear feet
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to construct a residential development and its necessary infrastructure.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The overall project consists of a multi -family & single-family residential development (i.e. 37 townhomes, 109 single family homes) with 15,000 SF of commercial space, and the
construction of roadway infrastructure, utilities, residential lots, mailbox kiosk, greenways and Stormwater Control Measures (SCM). Specifically, there are two proposed road crossings, fill
for an SCM, one utility crossing and buffer impacts associated with greenway construction, bypass discharge, SCM, and road grading. Equipment typically used for construction and
earthwork such as backhoes, bulldozers, excavators, graders, pavers etc. will be utilized for this project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2022-01734
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Joshua Harvey
Agency/Consultant Company: Soil R Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
USACE: SAW-2022-01734 email verified by Samantha Dailey on August 9, 2022. Note that per the Sackett decision, an updated AJD has been submitted to Matthew Martin with the
USACE.
NCDWR: NBRRO #22-319 Buffer determination made on September 14, 2022 by Chris Smith.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes
No

Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
It is my understanding that there are no intended future phases beyond the property boundaries shown. Therefore, no additional NWP, Regional General Permits, or IP are anticipated.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries p Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
L
Impact 2
2a1 Reason (?)
Road Crossing
2b. Impact type* (?)
P
2c. Type of W.
Fttomiand Hardwood Forest
2d. W. name
W3, W4 & W5
2e. Forested"
Yes
2f. Type of Jurisdicition *
?)
Both
2g• Impact
area
0.004
(acres)
Impact 3
T M Fill
P
Headwater Forest
W1 �Ye=f-th
ItEl_
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.044
21. Comments:
Total permanent loss wetland impacts = 1,938 SF/0.044 acres
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.044
F
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
3f. Type of
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
?)
Jurisdiction*
length*
S1
Impact 1 - Road Crossing -
Permanent
Culvert
Stream A
Perennial
Both
154
Culvert & Headwalls
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
g2
Impact - Road Crossing -
Permanent
Other
Stream A
Perennial
Both
4
52
Permanent No Permanent
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
Loss - Riprap Dissipater Pad
S3
Impact 1 - Road Crossing -
Temporary
Other
Stream A
Perennial
Both
5
16
Temporary Construction
Aveage (feet)
(linear feet)
Access
S4
Impact 2 - Road Crossing-
Permanent
Culvert
Stream B
Intermittent
Both
82
Culvert & Headwalls
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S5
Impact 2 - Road Crossing -
Permanent
Other
Stream B
Intermittent
Both
6
39
Permanent No Permanent
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
Loss - Riprap Dissipater Pad
S6
Impact 2 - Road Crossing -
Temporary
Other
Stream B
Intermittent
Both
6
26
Temporary Construction
Ave age (feet)
(linear feet)
Access
S7
Impact 9 - Sanitary Sewer
Temporary
Other
Stream A
Perennial
Both
8
30
Crossing - Temporary
::1
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
Construction Access
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
327
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
399
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
72
3j. Comments:
Permanent Stream Impacts = 236 LF (0.027 acres); Permanent No Permanent Loss Impacts = 91 LF (0.009 acres); Temporary Stream Impacts = 72 LF
(0.010 acres).
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)

6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply
Neuse Tar -Pamlico
Catawba Randleman
Goose Creek Jordan Lake
Other
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation requiredT
6f. Zone 1 impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
Impact 1 - Road Crossing
P
Stream A
No
9,186
5,069
Impact 2 - Road Crossing
P
Stream B
No
8,219
4,453
Impact 3 - SCM Grading
P
Stream A & B
No
0
6,536
Impact 4A - Stormwater Bypass
P
Stream B
No
1,352
303
Impact 413 - Sewer Easement
P
Stream B
Yes
293
0
Impact 5 - Road Retaining Wall & Grading
P
Stream A
Yes
0
854
Impact 7C - SCM Grading
P
Stream A
No
0
1,630
Impact 8C - Greenway
P
Stream A
No
0
2,770
Impact 913 - Sewer Easement
P
Stream A
No
120
1,069
Impact 9C - Greenway
P
Stream A
No
521
6,499
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 19,691.00 29,183.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 19,691.00 29,183.00
6i. Comments:
Deemed Allowable Riparian Buffer Impacts not included within table above. All deemed allowable impacts called out with "deemed allowable" notes on
impact exhibits. Deemed allowable impacts include: Impacts 4B (Zone 2), 6, 7A, 7B, 8A, 813 & 9A.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
L

1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
S&EC completed a wetland delineation and Neuse River Buffer evaluation for the entire property in order to identify natural resources so that impacts
could be avoided & minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Impact 1 is a proposed road crossing of a perennial stream. Proposed impacts include
permanent (i.e. culvert & headwalls), permanent -no permanent loss (i.e. riprap dissipator), temporary (i.e. construction access) stream impacts, and
associated riparian buffer impacts. This road crossing is required by the Town of Knightdale per their Transportation Plan and it is also providing access
to the northern portion of the property. Stream and riparian buffer impacts have been minimized by utilizing headwalls and retaining walls on both sides
of the crossing, and by designing the crossing at a near perpendicular angle. Stream mitigation is proposed at a 2:1 ratio to compensate for the
permanent stream loss. Temporary stream impacts will be brought back to pre -construction stream bed elevations and the stream banks will be
stabilized. Impact 2 is a proposed road crossing of an intermittent stream and wetlands. Proposed impacts include permanent (i.e. culvert & headwalls),
permanent -no permanent loss (i.e. riprap dissipator), temporary (i.e. construction access) stream impacts, permanent wetland impacts (i.e. culvert & fill),
and associated riparian buffer impacts. This road crossing is necessary to provide access to the northwestern portion of the property and lots. Stream
and riparian buffer impacts have been minimized by utilizing headwalls and retaining walls on both sides of the crossing, and by designing the crossing
at a near perpendicular angle. Stream mitigation is proposed at a 2:1 ratio to compensate for the permanent stream loss. Temporary stream impacts will
be brought back to pre -construction stream bed elevations and the stream banks will be stabilized. Impact 3 is proposed fill necessary for a Stormwater
Control Measure (SCM). Proposed impacts include permanent wetland loss and Zone 2 riparian buffer. This SCM has been located at the lowest point of
this drainage basin to allow for minimum cover over the storm drainage pipe and allow for regulated minimum separations between storm drainage,
waterline, and sanitary sewer piping. Relocating the SCM from this location in upland areas would not allow the site storm drainage to meet minimum
cover requirements and would also create vertical separation issues between the storm drainage, waterline, and sanitary sewer piping. Additionally, low
points would be created within the subdivision in which storm drainage relief could not be achieved due to elevation differences and could cause
potential flooding of residential homes. Impact 4A is necessary to bypass offsite stormwater. Proposed impacts include permanent Zone 1 & 2 riparian
buffer impacts. Stream impacts were avoided. Impact 4B is a proposed sanitary sewer extension and manhole. Proposed impacts include permanent
Zone 1 & 2 riparian buffer impacts. Zone 2 impacts are considered "deemed allowable". This impact is being required by the City of Raleigh Public Utility
Department (CORPUD), CORPUD requires a manhole stub to the property boundary. Zone 1 buffer mitigation is proposed at a 3:1 ratio to compensate
for the riparian buffer impacts. Impact 5 is a proposed retaining wall and grading for a road. Proposed impacts include permanent impacts to Zone 2 only.
This Zone 2 buffer impact is necessary because the Town of Knightdale doesn't allow retaining wall geogrid inside the Right of Way, and this retaining
wall allows for the avoidance of Zone 1 riparian buffer impacts. Zone 2 buffer mitigation is proposed at a 1.5:1 ratio to compensate for these riparian
buffer impacts. Impact 7C is proposed grading into Zone 2 for a Stormwater Control Measure (SCM). Proposed impacts include permanent Zone 2
riparian buffers. Zone 1 buffer impacts have been avoided. Impact 8C is proposed impacts for a greenway. This impact is necessary for a pedestrian
greenway. Riparian buffer impacts have been minimized by adding retaining walls at the back of the residential lots and shifting the greenway out of
Zone 1. Impact 9B is for a sanitary sewer construction. Proposed impacts include Zone 1 and Zone 2 riparian buffer impacts. Proposed impacts have
been minimized by shifting the easement to the south and also keeping a distance from the stream bank. Construction constraints include the retaining
wall for the lots and the greenway. Impact 9C is proposed impacts for a greenway. This impact is necessary for a pedestrian greenway. Riparian buffer
impacts have been minimized by adding retaining walls at the back of the residential lots and shifting the greenway out of Zone 1 to the maximum extent
practicable. Impacts 4B (Zone 2), 6, 7A, 7B, 8A, 8B & 9A are all considered "deemed allowable". The specific use per 15 NCAC 02B .0714 has been
added to the impact sheets.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Per the project engineer; Culvert crossings will utilized coffer dams, pump arounds, silt fencing and silt fencing outlets. The remainder of the site will
utilize silt fencing, silt fencing outlets, diversion ditches and sediment basins.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes
No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR
Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
EBX-Neuse I, LLC Neuse Riparian Buffer Umbrella Mitigation Bank, RES Neuse Buffer and Nutrient
Offset Umbrella Mitigation Bank, RES Poplar Creek Buffer & Nutrient Offset Umbrella Mitigation
Bank, EBX Upper Neuse Riparian Buffer Umbrella Mitigation Bank, RES 2021 Neuse Umbrella
Mitigation Bank, and RES 2022 Phase II Umbrella Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Quantity:
Riparian buffer 2,160
3c. Comments
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
Yes No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet) 4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
472 warm
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only): 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(square feet) (acres)

4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4h. Comments
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more information.
Yes No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact.
r7l��impact
6d. Total impact (square
feet)
Multiplier
6e. Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
413: non -perpendicular utility Zone 1
293
3
879
Zone 2 5: non -perpendicular road Zone 2 854 1.5 1,281
6f. Total buffer mitigation required
2,160
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services proposed?
Yes No
6j. Comments:
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
Local Government State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Town of Knightdale
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?
Yes No

2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? *
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated Wetlands Programs" document
prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft states that many private developments are unlikely to cause
cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in -fill, most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural and
silvicultural operations. The Weldon project is a residential development. Additionally, the project is located within the Town of Knightdale jurisdiction,
therefore the adjacent properties that have potential for development will have the following regulations to protect downstream waters: 1) the Neuse
River Basin Riparian Buffer Protection regulations, these regulations require limited development within the riparian buffer area, in addition Best
Management Practices may be required that control nitrogen if diffuse flow cannot be achieved; 2) the Phase II NPDES Stormwater Permit Program, this
program includes permitting requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) in addition to post -construction stormwater
management requirements. We anticipate that the DWR will advise us if any additional information is needed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Non discharge, City of Raleigh public utilities.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
Unknown
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
S&EC completed a Threatened & Endangered Species Report, to include a Self -Certification letter through the US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), a
query through the NC Natural Heritage Program database, and an official Species List through the iPac. A formal request was sent to the USFWS on
October 20, 2023. The S&EC determinations were that the proposed project is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or
threatened species, their formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Please
see attached S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species report.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?
The NOAA Habitat Conservation/Habitat Protection: National Marine Fish Service; Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website was referenced. No Essential
Fish Habitat was identified near the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)

7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? *
The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service interactive map was referenced on November 11, 2023, no historic listings or study list
entries or determined eligible listings were identified within the property boundaries. Additionally, no structures exist within the property boundaries.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? *
NC Flood Risk Information System Floodplain Mapping Program and confirmation from the project engineer.
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
PCN Attachments_Weldon.pdf 40.47MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Deborah Shirley
Signature
Behorah Shdel
Date
2/13/2024
V