20151070 Ver 1_Application_20151014

< 4, HANSON
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
TO: NC Division of Water Quality DATE: 10/13/15 PROJECT NO. 15RO114
WBSCP Unit ATTENTION: Roberto Scheller
512 North Salisbury Street RE: Pre-Construction Notification
Raleigh,North Carolina 27604 Bridge E.C. 59.3 Bent Replacements
WE ARE SENDING YOU ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items.
❑ Shop drawings Prints ❑ Reproducible Sketches Specifications
❑ Copy of letter Change order ❑ Calculations Other
COPIES DATE - `R't«9­"_NO:, DESCRIPTION ACTION aT
5 10/13/15 Pre-Construction Notification Permit Applications
2 10/13/15 Bridge E.C.59.3 Bent Replacement 11 x 17 Plans
1 10/13/15 Bridge E.C.59.3 Bent Replacement 22 x 34 Plans
1 10/13/15 Minor Water Quality Permit Fee
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
A ® For approval F ❑ No exceptions taken J � Rejected-see remarks
B ❑ For your use G ❑ Furnish as corrected K F—] Submit ❑ Copies for distribution
C ❑ As requested H Revise and resubmit L ❑ Return El corrected prints
D ❑ For review and comment j Submit specified item M ❑ Other-see remarks
E ❑ FOR BID DUE N El RETURNED PRINTS AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
The following attachments include Pre-Construction Notifica 'on Permit Applications,Bridge E.C.
59.3 Bent Replacement Plans (11 x 17 and 22 x 34),and a Minor at r Quality P rm' ee.
COPY TO: File, SIGNED:
If enclosures are not as noted,please notify us at once.
Hanson Professional Services Inc.
13801 Riverport Drive, Suite 300 •St. Louis, MO 63043
• Phone [phone] Fax [phone]

Hanson Professional Services Inc
<O! HANSON 13801 Riverport Drive,Suite 300
St Louis,Missouri 63043
Engmeenng I Planning I PAW Services
[phone]
Fax [phone]
www hanson-inc corn
October 13, 2015 2 0 7 5 0 7
Tom Stevens Roberto Scheller
Washington Regulatory Field Office NC Division of Water Quality
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WBSCP Unit
2407 West 5th Street 512 North Salisbury Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Re: Pre-Construction Notification L:
m n I
Bridge E.C. 59.3 Bent Replace e is
Norfolk Southern Railway
New Bern, Craven County, North Carolina
S
Dear Mr. Stevens and Mr. Scheller:
Norfolk Southern Railway (Norfolk Southern) requests Section 404/401 permit authorization for
minor impacts to waters of the United States associated with the replacement of eight (8) bents
within the existing railway Bridge E.C. 59.3 south of New Bern in Craven County, North Carolina.
Bridge E.C. 59.3 is a swing span bridge with 55 steel bents crossing the Trent River. Norfolk
Southern plans to replace the five (5) bents south of the swing span and three (3) bents north of
the swing span as part of long-term maintenance of the bridge. Hanson Professional Services Inc.
(Hanson) is serving as the authorized agent for Norfolk Southern, the applicant.
The following sections and attachments, including the Pre-Construction Notification, provide
notification for the minor impacts to the Trent River associated with replacement of the eight (8)
bents within Bridge E.C. 59.3.
Attachment A—Pre-Construction Notification
Attachment B—Bent Replacement Plans
Attachment C—Figures
Attachment D— USFWS IPac Report
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The purpose of the project is to replace eight (8) deteriorated bents on Bridge E.C. 59.3. The
new bents will be placed within the same footprint as the existing bents. Bridge E.C. 59.3 is
located at Latitude 35.099673 and Longitude -77.041407 south of New Bern in Craven County
North Carolina. The bent replacement plans are included in Attachment B and the project
location can be seen on figures in Attachment C.
Bridge E.C. 59.3 crosses the Trent River and is composed of 55 bents and a swing span. The
proposed bent replacement will replace the five (5) bents south of the swing span and three (3)
bents north of the swing span. The existing bents will be cut off as close to the surface as possible.
The bents being replaced were installed in 1989. Installation of the new bents will impact less than
0.001 acre of the Trent River.
15R0114

- 2 -
All construction materials will be hauled by rail cars to the site and will be stored in upland areas
along the Norfolk Southern right-of-way. Installation of the new bents and removal of the
existing bents will occur from barges to further minimize the overall impact of the project. Due
to the methods of construction, impacts to waters of the United States will be minimal.
THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES INQUIRY
Hanson collected information from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) IPaC web site
regarding species of concern in the area of Bridge E.C. 59.3.
The IPaC database listed nine species potentially within the range of the bridge. Due to the
methods of construction the project will have a minimal impact to the Trent River. Construction
activities will also occur between October 1 st and February 13th to avoid impacts to anadromous
fish species. The IPaC correspondence is included in Attachment D.
REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION
On behalf of Norfolk Southern, we respectfully request Section 404/401 permit authorization for
impacts to waters of the United States associated with replacement of eight (8) bents within Bridge
E.C. 59.3. The Pre-Construction Notification is included in Attachment A to initiate the permit
process.
Thank you for your time and attention regarding this project. Please contact me at 314-942-5287 if
you have questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
HANSON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC.
qeNL�f --.)�t--
Jennifer A. Sunley
Biologist
Attachments
15RO114

ATTACHMENT A
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION
15R0114

13 V4 waL'."? Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
®� : < DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s)of approval sought from the Corps: ❑X Section 404 Permit ❑X Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit(NWP)number: 3 or General Permit(GP)number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑X Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s)of approval sought from the DWQ(check all that apply):
❑- 401 Water Quality Certification—Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification—Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑Yes ❑X No ❑Yes ❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank ❑ Yes ❑X No
or in-lieu fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑x Yes ❑No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑X Yes ❑ No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Norfolk Southern Bridge EC-59.3
2b. County: Craven
2c. Nearest municipality/town: New Bern
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only,T.I.P. or state project no: N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s)on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Railroad Company
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 0068 0312, recorded 10/02/1867
3c. Responsible Party(for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address: 2809 Highwoods BLVD Suite 100
3e. City, state,zip: Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑X Other,specify: Owner/Norfolk Southern Railway
4b. Name: Jackson Owens
4c. Business name Norfolk Southern Railway
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: 1200 Peachtree Street, NE
4e. City, state,zip: Atlanta, Georgia 30309
4f. Telephone no.: 404-527-2533
4g. Fax no.: 404-527-2589
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Jennifer Sunley
5b. Business name Hanson Professional Services
(if applicable):
5c. Street address: 13801 Riverport Drive, Suite 300
5d. City, state,zip: Saint Louis, Missouri 63043
5e. Telephone no.: 314-942-5287
5f. Fax no.: 314-770-0428
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 7-RAILRD-NCRR
1 b. Site coordinates(in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.099673 Longitude: -77.041407
1 c. Property size: 195 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Trent River
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Trent River
2c. River basin: White Oak
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Bridge EC-59.3 is an active rail bridge that crosses the Trent River just south of New Bern,North Carolina See location maps included in attached
report.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial)on the property: 1,900
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to replace 8 deteriorated sections of bridge EC-59.3 to maintain reliable rail service
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Five bridge sections south of the swing span and three bridge sections north of the swing span will be replaced within the alignment of the existing brad
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ❑Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property/
project(including all prior phases)in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination,what type ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes,who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name(if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑Yes ❑No ❑X Unknown
this project(including all prior phases)in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to"help file"instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project(check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams—tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑X Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site,then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of
number Corps(404,10)or impact
Permanent(P)or DWQ(401, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W2 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W3 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
N/4 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W5 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W6 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
2g.Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts(including temporary impacts)proposed on the site,then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER)or Type of Average Impact
number intermittent(INT)? jurisdiction stream length
Permanent(P)or width (linear
Temporary(T) (feet) feet)
S1 Choose one
S2 Choose one
S3 Choose one
S4 Choose one
S5 Choose one
S6 Choose one
3h.Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds,estuaries,tributaries,sounds,the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S.then indivii ually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact(acres)
Permanent(P)or type
Temporary T
01 P Trent River Bridge Other 0.001
O2 Choose one Choose
03 Choose one Choose
04 Choose one Choose
4f.Total open water impacts 0.001
4g. Comments: Eight(8)deteriorated sections of the existing rail bridge will be replaced. The new bridge sections will be replaced along the same
alignment as the existing structures. Please see the attached letter and project plans for additional information.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed,the complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts(acres) Stream Impacts(feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f.Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts(for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer,then complete the chart below. If yes,then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation.then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑Tar-Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑Other:
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact Stream name Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2
number— mitigation impact impact
Permanent(P)or required? (square (square
Temporary T feet) feet
B 1 Yes/No
B2 Yes/No
B3 Yes/No
B4 Yes/No
B5 Yes/No
B6 Yes/No
6h.Total Buffer Impacts:
6i.Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The eight(8)bridge sections will be replaced within the same alignment as the existing sections.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The eight(8)bridge sections will be replaced within the same alignment as the existing sections minimizing impacts to the Trent River.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S.or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by(check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes,which mitigation option will be used for this ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a.Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested(DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal)wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
N/A
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules)—required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes,then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f.Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required,discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan(required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes,then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0.0 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑Yes 0 No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
The proposed replacement of eight(8)sections of the existing bridge will not increase the overall imperviousness of the existing bridge structure.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan,then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? N/A
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? N/A
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply(check all that apply): F]E]❑Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑Yes ❑No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ORW
(check all that apply): ❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation(DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public(federal/state/local)funds or the ❑Yes ❑X No
use of public(federal/state)land?
1 b. If you answered"yes"to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State El Yes ❑No
(North Carolina)Environmental Policy Act(NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered"yes"to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) Yes F1 No
Comments:
2. Violations(DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules(15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules(15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, F1 Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules(15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered"yes"to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts(DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project(based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts)result in F1 Yes ❑X No
additional development,which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered"yes"to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered"no,"provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal(DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge)of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form—Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat(Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ®Yes ❑No
impacts?
5c. If yes,indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS IPac database. An official species list is included in Attachment XX in enclosed report.
6. Essential Fish Habitat(Corps Requirement)
6a.Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ®Yes ❑ No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Spoke with Shawn Staples with the Division of Marine Fisheries. Construction activities will occur after October 1 st.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources(Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state,federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ®No
status(e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The eight(8)bridge sections being replaced were installed in 1989.
8.Flood Zone Designation(Corps Requirement)
8a.Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ®Yes ❑No
8b. If yes,explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The bridge opening will remained unchanged after construction. The new bridge sections will be installed within the footprint of the existing bridge.
8c.What source(s)did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Jackson Owens 10/9/2015
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name icant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's sl6nature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

ATTACHMENT B
BENT REPLACEMENT PLANS
15R0114

28'-,,. ,T•-6 • INDEX OF SHEETS
SHEET SHEET TITLE
NO
EXISTING SWING SPAN 1 EXISTING PROFILE
2 PROPOSED PLAN d PROFILE
3 STEEL BENT REPLACEMENT
4 CONCRETE ENCASEMENT d MISC DETAILS
NORTH TO NEW BERN. NC SOUTH TO JAEfS CITY. NC
NOTES
THE DESIGN LIVE LOAD IS COOPER'S
"""'-'-"-""--- EBO WITH DIESEL IMPACT
DRAW PILES ARE TO BE DRIVEN TO 100
TON CAPACITY
T ENDERS EXISTING AND PROPOSED BENT
LOCATIONS ARE TO BE VERIFIED
BEFORE DRIVING PILE
H O U S E AN ACCURATE LOG OF ALL DRIVEN
PILE IS TO BE KEPT AND FURNISHED
TO THE OFFICE OF CHIEF ENGINEER
-------- --------------------
BRIDGES d STRUCTURES
WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT AREMA
................ -----, GUIDELINES FOR CONCRETE AND
STEEL STRUCTURES AND FOUNDATIONS
ALL STEEL PILE SURFACES BENEATH
PROPOSED CONCRETE ENCASEMENTS
SHALL BE CLEANED AND PAINTED
USING INTERZONE 954 IN ACCORDANCE
NORMAL MATER SURFACE WITH MANUFACTURER'S
Li
WATER o.s' ACE RECOMMENDATIONS
EXISTING PROFILE NORTH APPROACH
SCALE 'Yz = 1' u 0
AFE NO: F-02096
STORE N0: 8045
NORMAL WATER SURFACE
ELEV 0.5' N-
^_ I REV BY OATS DESCRPTION
_
NORFOLK
SOUTHERN
- PIEDMONT DIVISION
EDBU DISTRICT
OFFiCC OF CHEF ENGNEER.BROGES 4 STRUCTURES ATLANTA,GA
EXISTING PROFILE
EXISTING PROFILE SOUTH APPROACH BRIDGE EC-593 NEW BERN,NC
SCALE ',s' = 1' OVER TRENT RIVER
DON JBO VA-REG HM NVRTO 03694 A own WEFosT EC-59 3
cHK FEE BROO13916 DATE JULY 17,2015
SHEET No 1 OF 4 ORAWNG No EC 59 3 15 01

: DRAW
TENDERS
HOUSE _
2B•_',' ----
-t-- T—
PIERS B'- ......::::::::::SO:-C L'::::.::........ q•_1 I I --
' 1 I
wt 6x51 -9'-2" - w16x51-10-4" wt 6x51 -t0'-4"
F E F E: E Flu u
2-0 5-z z•o z -0 6-A
1 T -B 9 9-3 �.IFFENER PLATE
__
I EXISTING�—Ii NORNASUWATER I EXISTING
III I II
ACE
ELEV 0.5' 4/- I ^
11 -r--T li 1 1
1 1 1 1 I
i I I i
SEE BENT CONCRETE
ENCASEMENT ADDITION
DETAIL
I I I I
PROPOSED PROFILE NORTH APPROACH
SCALE ',z• = 1'
12-2'" PIERS
I 1 DIA x 6'AST,A325 BOLTS NEW TOP OF STEEL ELEVATION
wI TN SS 63 NUTS 6 F<36 WASHERS TO MATCH EXIST INO TOP OF STEEL
�'�STIFFENE fDR HE w TIE DECK
LATE ST I
1 W16%5T -12'-2' W16x57-12'-2' W16x5T-12'-2" W16x51 -12'-2' —
I
1 I NORMAL WATER I
=1= 1 u u I F E F ELEV OSSRFA%E E F E E F - -,
2-o a*z z-0 2-o B -z z-o z-o a-z z- I AFE N0: F-02096
— 11 -2" B il'-6q R 11 -6� B 11 -3,a
r
FISTING I I IEXISTINGI ' t o STORE N0: 8045
EX
I i ill I I I
u REV By DATE I DESCRPTOH
NORFOLK
—t— &JVkiQP SOUTHERN
PIEDMONT DIVISION
I--� --I EDBU DISTRICT
SEE BENT CONCRETE
ENCASEMENT ADDITION OFFICE OF CHEF ENONEER-BROGES L STRUCTURES ATLANTA GA
DETAIL
I i I i i i EXISTING PROFILE
' BRIDGE EC-59.3 - NEW BERN,NC
PROPOSED PROFILE SOUTH APPROACH OVER TRENT RIVER
SCALE 1'Z' = 1' DON J80 I vAL REC Nw 1vRN1 D11"1.0— MLEPOST EC-59.3
cra FLE BR0013916 DATE JULY 17.
2015
SHEET NO 2 OF 4 1 ORAwWw No EC-59.3 15 01 _

FABRICATED STEEL REQUIREMENTS
2L3',{x3'4*xLv'
WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH CURRENT AREMA GUIDELINES FOR
STEEL STRUCTURES
ST fFENF3R PLATE ST — — THE FABRICATOR SHALL BE CERTIFIED
3�F'x 4 x 1'-3' UNDER THE AISC DUALITY CERTIFICATION
DRAW ALL STRUCTURAL OSTEEL MEMBERS AND
TENDERS irP A L COMPONENTS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM
ANGLE TD A992 OR A709 GRADE 50 AS APPLICABLE
WEB CDNN.
TRACK a BRIDGE k THE W16x57 BEAMS ARE FRACTURE
HOUSE CRITICAL MEMBERS (FCM) AND SHALL
W16x57 STRINGERS MEET THE IMPACT TEST REOUIREMENTS AS
SET FORTH IN AREMA CHAPTER 15.
W12z35 DIAPHRAM -5 SECTION 1.14: NOTCH TOUGHNESS AND
BE To STIFFENER TESTING REOUIREMENTS SHALL BE BASED
SOLE PLATE PLATE ST ON A MINIMUM SERVICE TEMPERATURE OF
SECTION C—C -30 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT (ZONE 2)
CiL 3'•' t -sS,. t-V-5-V-5- 3-6' 1 -5 -5 11 SCALE'•i=1" AS L NOTED AOTHERWISE; AILL HOLES EXCEPT
S71FF�NER PLATE BA 11 o SHALL BE DRILLED FULL-SIZE OR
1 I / SUBDRILLED AND REAMED
2'•'2'•' " FASTENERS SHALL BE 7" DIAMETER ASTM
A325 BOLTS WITH A563 NUTS AND
F436 WASHERS: BOLTS SHALL BE
I L3,n x3,,.xyr. TIGHTENED USING THE TURN-OF-NUT
/ METH DO TO OBTAIN A MINIMUM TENSION
OF 39 KIPS
CLEAN A PAINT ALL P ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL BE 1" DIAMETER
E%POSED STEEL SURFACES ti [ _ I I I ASTM A325 BOLTS WITH A563 NUTS AND
u51NC INTERZONE 954 9 F436 WASHERS
A xP1iING SHALL WELDS MEEETA THE WREOUIIREMENTSDOFE THE
NEN 12 L BRACING OD PIPE PILE � ISEE PILE TD AWS BRIDGE WELDING CODE Dt.S
DETAIL 2-D L, ONLY THE SUBMERGED ARC WELDING (SAW)
PROCESS OR SHIELDED METAL ARC
WELDING (SMAW) PROCESS MAY BE USED.
A D LINE I ' I I ' I I I CONCRETE ENCASEMENT D I APHRAM CONNECTIONS AND WELDERS SHALL BE AWS-CERTIFIED
ELEV-10.0' +i- 1 I I I 1 I I I I ' I , DETAIL SCALE '•, -1' IN ALL WELDING POSITIONS
1 ALL FABRICATED STEEL SHALL BE
SHOP-PAINTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CURRENT NORFOLK SOUTHERN
LONGITUDINAL VIEW SPECIFICATIONS USING AN APPROVED
INORGANIC ZINC-ACRYLIC SYSTEM WITH
PROPOSED ELEVATION OF BENTS BLACK FINISH
SCALE''e=1' ALL WELDS AND WELDING PROCEDURES
SHALL MEET THE REOUIREMENTS OF THE
AWS BRIDGE WELDING CODE D1.5
ELECTRODES FOR SHIELDED METAL ARC
WELDING SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
OF AWS A5.1 AND SHALL BE OF THE LOW
HYDROGEN CLASSIFICATION
THE CAP BEAMS AND BEAM SPAN SHALL
�L ATEE PA 3'-0' BE SHIPPED FULLY ASSEMBLED. AND
SOLE PLATES AND LOOSE STIFFENER
PLATES SHALL BE SHIPPED ON PALLETS
•1 _ -I—- —_ - - - TNIBRSE PLA ESS
a TOP FLANGES MATERIAL REQUIRED
1-2-q, 2-T 1 -2'z 1 -2'z 1 -9'i
OTY ITEM
123,4" DO x •B" WALL THICKNESS x 60' PIPE
CAP BEAM PLAN 30 PILE. ASTM A252 GRADE 2. 1.5 TONS EA 45 TONS
SCALE ''4" = 1' 20 APF P13006 CONICAL POINT FOR 123," PILE
20 APF S-20000 SPLICER RING FOR 123 " PILE
24 20' REBAR CAGE FOR 123'" OD PILE 200 LB EA
2'-0' 2'-0' 6'-4• 2'-0• QQ W12x35 PIPE PILE CONCRETE. 5000 PSI 36 CU.YD. AFE NO: F-02096
DIAPHRAM HP12x53 BRACING, ASTM A572 GRADE 50 100 LF STORE NO: B045
INTERZONE 954 18 GAL
5 W14x159 x 11'-0" CAP BEAM
DIAPHRAM f NER PLATE BA1 7" x ,"CONNECTION W16z51 Sifl INGER } I 4 W16x57 x 9'-2" STRINGER. 523 LB EA 2090 LB
(V'
DETAIL 8 W16x57 x 10'-4" STRINGER. 589 LB EA 4710 LB REV aY DATE OESCRPTIOH
'i SMOCK PAD z SOLE PLATE 1 T SOLE PLATE x 16 W16x57 x 12'-2" STRINGER. 694 LB EA 11096 LB
° r14x159 ' •i BASE PLATE PA '.z BASE PLATE PA II '"SHOCK 112 STIFFENER PLATE ST1 33'" x 3'" x 1'-3" NORFOLK
11'-O'CAP BEAM I II PAD 28 l'-5" W12x35 DIAPHRAMS. ASTM A36 SOUTHERN
g si IFFE R MATE BA 14 3'-5" W12x35 DIAPHRAMS. ASTM A36
T••' •.,•- PIEDMONT DIVISION
3.:x 1'-3' 1 168 L4x4 x'," x 1'-0" CONNECTION ANGLE
123,.]'OD PIPE PILE STIFFENER I I 8 1," x 15" x 2'-9" SOLE PLATE EDBU DISTRICT
INSTALL REBAR CADS PLATE ST
A FILL WITH CONCRETE 1 I 20 '," x 7" x 2'-9" SOLE PLATE
1 •, OFfMI OF CHEF ENGrEER-BROpES A STRUCTURES ATLANTA W
:;€AN R, I I ;e PREFORMED FABRIC sloe PAD PLATE PA STEEL BENT REPLACEMENT
1 DIA x 6'ASTM A325 BOLT. 1•CIA z 1B-ASTM A36 FULL , -3~ x z'-9~ x 3•" THICK BRIDGE EC 59.3 NEW BERN,NC
A563 NUT d f436 MASHER xEAVYRHEX NUT ANCHOR WASHER 40 1" DIA x 6" ASTM A325 BOLT, A563
NUT Q F436 WASHER OVER TRENT RIVER
CAP BEAM AND STRINGER ASSEMBLY 1" DIA x 18" ASTM A36 FULLY THREADED DGN JBO vn ate NN rvRNx0394 A 03695 MAEPOST EC-59 3
SCALE '�a' = 1' 16 ANCHOR ROD. HEAVY HEX NUT 8 WASHER
DHK FAE BR0013916 DATE JULY 17,2015
SHEET No 3 OF 4 1 ORAWra HD EC-59 3 15 01

SCHEDULE OF REINFORCING STEEL FOR SCHEDULE OF REINFORCING STEEL
DRAWHOUSE PILE CONCRETE ENCASEMENT FOR BENT CONCRETE ENCASEMENT ADDITION
Q
B
p Q A ' ¢1'•j DIA
y 1.j DIOi TED
A ROLES -
I a J TYP •1'SI
„ ROLES N
TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 1 TYPE 2 2 2-5 2
NO PC TYPE EST NO PC TYPE EST
PCs SIZE LENGTH MARK NO A B WEIGHT PCs SIZE LENGTH MARK NO A B WEIGHT COPE WEB OF SOLE PLATE 1 SE BASE PLATE PA
32 #5 5'-3" 501 2 5'-3" 176 37 tt5 15'-33,i' 503 1 4'_1��j' 7'-3,4" 592 BRACE TO
CLEAR PILE ¢t',i DIA
32 4 B'-3'�j' 502 1 t'-105's"1'-105,8" 277 6 42'-4" 504 1 17'-7" 7'-2" 265 ¢t'.NOOES HoLEs
MATERIAL REOUIRED FOR 1 40'-814' 505 1 4'-1" 32'-634" 43 123"4" OD ^
DRAWHOUSE PILE ENCASEMENT 2 32'-63i' sob 2 32'-63;' 68 PIPE PILE 4„ 'z z-S'2 z 2•-s z
CONCRETE. 5000 PSI 4 CU YO MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR BENT HP12x53 BRACE SOLE PLATE 1 SF 3�a' SHOCK PAD
REINFORCING STEEL. ASTM A615 GRADE 60 453 LB CONCRETE ENCASEMENT ADDITION PILE TO BRACE CONNECTION DETAIL
CONCRETE, 5000 PSI 16 CU YD
REINFORCING STEEL. ASTM A615 GRADE 60 968 LB %JLt'li DIA ¢t'•i DIA
SLOTTED ROLES
HOLES
2 2-5 2 2 2-5'2
NOTES SOLE PLATE 2 SE SOLE PLATE 2 SF
CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLUMP
m OF 4" AND A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE
501 ' t Sot 10 o STRENGTH OF 5000 PSI AT 28 DAYS
ALL SURFACE EDGES SHALL HAVE A 3,4"
CHAMFER
4 CONCRETE COVER OVER REINFORCING
STEEL SHALL BE 11,j'
REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO
a ASTM A615 GRADE 60
° FABRICATION. BENDING. AND PLACEMENT tt8 BAR x 1'-4
OF REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE IN
^ r, ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT AREMA
Sox 6 s z I B GUIDELINES FOR CONCRETE STRUCTURES
AND FOUNDATIONS 123,q' 00 PIPE PILE
m CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A WATER-CEMENT
RAT10 OF 0.40. AMA%]MUM SLUMP OF PREFABRICATED REBAR
3". AND A MAXIMUM AGGREGATE SIZE CAGE SIX u6 BARS
DRAWHOUSE PILE OF 3'4 WITH u3 TIES
CONCRETE ENCASEMENT SECTION B-B — CUT 1" x t j' DEEP DIA
SCALE 1' SCALE '.j t' NOTCH IN PILE AT CUTOFF
GUY WIRE
I I
------ _�L
z I ' sos
III 1 PLACE THREE 3" DIA
SNAP-ON PLASTIC
^' so3 RINGS EVERY 4TH TIE
,� TO MAINTAIN
11,j' CLEARANCE
4R B 2-1.2 7 0 9 2 -Z 7 8 9 2°B 7 a 9 2-2 1 0 9 '-1.r 4.j 504 506
I I I BAR LAPIN I I I I I I I
0
I _— REBAR CAGE
BENT CONRETE INSTALLATION DETAIL
ENCASEMENT ADDITION SECTION D-D CAGE TO EXTEND 10' MIN AFE NO: F-02096
SCALE j--t' SCALE ',j-t' BELOW GROUND LINE STORE N0: B045
REV By DATE DESCRIPTCH
MARK ALL TIES THIS END
NORFOLK
10'-0 SOUTHERN
x•_y,- e•-S z'-9'- INSIDE NO PC SIZE HORIZONTAL DIMS BOLT LENGTH PIEDMONT DIVISION
SHOULDER PCS MARK ROUGH q D LEFT RIGHT
FOR PRE EDBU DISTRICT
- PLATED TIES 32 1 9" x 10" 1'-31,j' 8'-8''j'
OFEEZ DE 04Ef ENG4EER-BROCES L STRUCTURES ATLANTA CA
9" x 10" t'-3"j' 8'-8',j' 13" 13"STD HOOK CONCRETE ENCASEMENT & MISC DETAILS
A D BNL;VHULES BRIDGE EC-59.3 - NEW BERN,NC
NOTE OVER TRENT RIVER
TIE FRAMING OAK TIES TO MEET CURRENT NORFOLK SOUTHERN DcN JBO v&REc"t~om"A om% uEEPoST EC-59 3
DETAIL SPECIFICATIONS DATED MARCH 2005
CHR FEE BROO13916 DATE JULY 17,2015
SCALE '"i' = 1'
SHEET Ho 4 OF 4 mAmHC No EC-59.3 15 01

ATTACHMENT C
FIGURES
15R0114

ATTACHMENT D
USFWS IPAC REPORT
15R0114

United States Department of the Interior SU`VIOR�'
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
t*
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office,.
551 PYLON DRIVE,SUITE F
RALEIGH,NC 27606
PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2016-SLI-0001 October 01, 2015
Event Code: 04EN2000-2016-E-00005
Project Name: Bridge E.0 59.3
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service)under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of
the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can
be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed
list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally-listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative
effects, before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the
proposed action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse,direct or indirect effect) on
federally listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless
an Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete
record of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified
personnel conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related
articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan
(http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/eagle—guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects
should follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy[) for minimizing
impacts to migratory birds and bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at:
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentB irdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm;
http://www.towerkill.com; and
http•//www fws gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/comtow.htmi.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National
Marine Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems
you should also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].
Attachment
2

United States Department of Interior
+� Fish and Wildlife Service
Project name: Bridge E.0 59.3
Official Species List
Provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
POST OFFICE BOX 33726
RALEIGH,NC 27636
[phone]
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2016-SLI-0001
Event Code: 04EN2000-2016-E-00005
Project Type: TRANSPORTATION
Project Name: Bridge E.0 59.3
Project Description: The purpose of the project is to replace 8 deteriorated sections of bridge EC-
59.3 to maintain reliable rail service. Five bridge sections south of the swing span and three bridge
sections north of the swing span will be replaced within the alignment of the existing bridge.
Please Note: The FWS office may have modified the Project Name and/or Project Description, so it
may be different from what was submitted in your previous request. If the Consultation Code
matches, the FWS considers this to be the same project. Contact the office in the 'Provided by'
section of your previous Official Species list if you have any questions or concerns.
http://ecos.i'ws.gov/ipac, 10/01/2015 12:33 PM
1

'° United States Department of Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
Project name: Bridge E.0 59.3
Endangered Species Act Species List
There are a total of 9 threatened or endangered species on your species list. Species on this list should be considered in
an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area.For example,certain
fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. Critical habitats listed under the
Has Critical Habitat column may or may not lie within your project area. See the Critical habitats within your
project area section further below for critical habitat that lies within your project. Please contact the designated FWS
office if you have questions.
Birds Status Has Critical Habitat Condition(s)
Red Knot(Calidris canutus rufa) Threatened
Red-Cockaded woodpecker(Picoides Endangered
borealis)
Population:Entire
Fishes
Atlantic sturgeon(Acipenser Endangered
oxyrinchus oayrinchus)
Population:Carolina DPS
Shortnose sturgeon(Acipenser Endangered
brevirostrum)
Population:Entire
Flowering Plants
rough-leaved loosestrife(Lysimachia Endangered
asperulaefolia)
sensitive joint-vetch(Aeschynomene Threatened
virginica)
Mammals
http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 10/01/2015 12:33 PM
3

United States Department of Interior
+� Fish and Wildlife Service
Project name: Bridge E.0 59.3
West Indian Manatee(Trichechus Endangered Final designated
manatus)
Population:Entire
Reptiles
American alligator(Alligator Similarity of
mississippiensis) Appearance
Population:Entire (Threatened)
Leatherback sea turtle(Dermochelys Endangered Final designated
coriacea)
Population:Entire
http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 10/01/2015 12:33 PM
4

United States Department of Interior
.� Fish and Wildlife Service
Project name: Bridge E.0 59.3
Critical habitats that lie within your project area
There are no critical habitats within your project area.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 10/01/2015 12:33 PM
5

47•_65. INDEX OF SHEETS
SHEET SHEET TITLE
NO
EXISTING SWING SPAN I 1 EXISTING PROFILE
2 PROPOSED PLAN & PROFILE
3 STEEL BENT REPLACEMENT
4 CONCRETE ENCASEMENT & MISC DETAILS
NORTH TO NEW BERN. NC SOUTH TO JAMES CITY. NC
NOTES
THE DESIGN LIVE LOAD IS COOPER'S
-
- -- -- - - -- -- - - - - - - - - EBO WITH DIESEL IMPACT
DRAW PILES ARE TO BE DRIVEN TO 100
TON CAPACITY
AND PROPOSED BENT
CITY
TENDERS
EXISTING ARE TO BE VERIFIED
BEFORE DRIVING PILE
HOUSE AN ACCURATE LOG OF ALL DRIVEN
PILE IS TO BE KEPT AND FURNISHED
- - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- -
TO THE OFF[CE OF CHIEF ENGINEER
- BRIDGES 8 STRUCTURES
WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT AREMA
- - - - - - - ---- - - - - - - ,. GUIDELINES FOR CONCRETE AND
STEEL STRUCTURES AND FOUNDATIONS
ALL STEEL PILE SURFACES BENEATH
PROPOSED CONCRETE ENCASEMENTS
SHALL BE CLEANED AND PAINTED
USING INTERZONE 954 IN ACCORDANCE
NORMAL WATER SURFACE WITH MANUFACTURER'S
I I I I ; ElEV 0.5' +i- RECOMMENDATIONS
I
'F- 'F I
U Li
EXISTING PROFILE NORTH APPROACH
SCALE NZ' = 1' u u
L 1 4 2015 ;���RE_"'PERAAI h-ING
)
4) AFE NO: F-02096
STORE NO: 8045
NORMAL ELEVROSSRFACE
REV BY DATE DESCRIPTION
I l r ^I I I
NORFOLK WATE
I _T - -I I SOUTHERN
PIEDMONT DIVISION
u u EDBU DISTRICT
OFFICE OF CHIEF ENGINEER -BRIDGES 5 STRUCTURES ATLANTA.GA
EXISTING PROFILE
EXISTING PROFILE SOUTH APPROACH BRIDGE EC-59.3 - NEW BERN, NC
SCALE N z' = 1' OVER TRENT RIVER
DGN JBO VAL REC NUM(VRN):03694 6 03695 MILEPOST EC-59.3
CHX FILE BROO13916 DATE JULY 17.2015
SHEET NO 1 OF 4 1 DRAWING NO EC-59.3 15 Oi

-- -- --- - - - - - - - - -- - - - --
DRAW
TENDERS
HOUSE
28'-I-'
PIERS . . . . . . . .. .. . . - - - - - - -- - - I
I 1
W16x57 -9'-2' - W16x57 - 10'-4' y WI6x57 - 10'-4'
\ 1 I
' F E F I E: E I F1 I u u _
2 -0 5-2 2';0 2'-0' '-0 6'-4-
I �
9 -831Z 8, 9'--337
It 5 STIFFENER
.� PLATE
I EXISTIN—TIII NORMAL WATER I EXISTING
SURFACE I I
I I I I i I ELEV 0.5' +/-
I I^ l F ^I
I 1 11 I 1
SEE BENT CONCRETE
ENCASEMENT ADDITION
DETAIL
I I I I
PROPOSED PROFILE NORTH APPROACH
SCALE ',2' = 1'
47'-6S,J'
1 1 1 1'-6' 12'-231' 12'-2314' 11'-7',j' PIERS
1' DIA x 6' ASTM A325 BOLTS NEW TOP OF STEEL ELEVATION
WITH 5563 NUTS d F436 MASHERS TO MATCH EXISTING TOP OF STEEL
QQ 3�i STIFFENE FOR NEW TIE DECK
ALATE ST I ———
II I W16x5T - 12'-2' W16x57 - 12'-2' W16x5T - 12'-2' W16x57 - 12'-2' I —
1
u u I F E F NORMASURFACE E F E E F
ELEV 0.5' +/-
2'- - e -z 21-0 2'-0' V-2' 2'-1' 2'-0 8-2 z -o 2'-0' 8'-2' z - I A F E NO: F-02096
1 1
-2 B 11 -6 8 11 -6'4
EXISTING I 11 IEXISTINGI I I STORE �NO: B045
I 1 I I I I I Z REV By DATE DESCRIPTION
!�•
t_ NORFOLK
SOUTHERN
I I 1
I U EDB DISTRICT
-_I PIEDMONT DIVISION
SEE BENT CONCRETE
ENCASEMENT ADDITION \ \ , \ , \ , \ , OFFICE OF CHIEF ENGINEER -BRIDGES 1.STRUCTURES ATLANTA GA
DE TA
I I EXISTING PROFILE
BRIDGE EC-59.3 - NEW BERN, NC
PROPOSED PROFILE SOUTH APPROACH OVER TRENT RIVER
SCALE ' z' = 1' UGN JBO VA REC NUM(VRN)•03694 6 03695 MLEPOST EC-59.3
CHIC FILE BR0013916 DATE JULY 17,2015
SHEET NO 2 OF 4 1 DRAWING NO EC-59.3 15 01

FABRICATED STEEL REQUIREMENTS
21­31'{x3',2"x3R" WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH CURRENT AREMA GUIDELINES FOR
STEEL STRUCTURES
THE FABRICATOR SHALL BE CERTIFIED
STj,FFENF3R"PLATE ST — — UNDER THE AISC QUALITY CERTIFICATION
DRAW 3 j x , x 1'-3" PROGRAM. CATEGORY I
ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL MEMBERS AND
TENDERS TYP ALL COMPONENTS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM
ANGLE To A992 OR A709 GRADE 50 AS APPLICABLE
WEB CONN.
TRACK d BRIDGE HOUSE k k _ THE W16x57 BEAMS ARE FRACTURE
W16x57 STRINGERS 1'-6°1'-9" 1'-9'1'-6°
CRITICAL MEMBERS (FCM) AND SHALL
¢ MEET THE IMPACT TEST REQUIREMENTS AS
" SET FORTH IN AREMA CHAPTER 15,
W12x35 DIAPHRAM I I SECTION 1.14: NOTCH TOUGHNESS AND
BEAM To STIFFENER TESTING REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE BASED
SOLE PLATE PLATE ST ON A MINIMUM SERVICE TEMPERATURE OF
SECTION C-C -30 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT (ZONE 2)
STIFFENER 3'." x 1 LATE SCALE ''z' = 1 HOLES
S NOTEDAOTHERWISE; DIAMETER EXCEPT
STIFFENER PLATE BA tt 1 -5 1 -5 3 -6 1 -5 t'-5 tt ,
t1 -o SHALL BE DRILLED FULL-SIZE OR
I / SUBDR[LLED AND REAMED
1 2''"2''" FASTENERS SHALL BE 1" DIAMETER ASTM
12f I I 11' A325 BOLTS WITH A563 NUTS AND
ILL I F436 WASHERS: BOLTS SHALL BE
L3',x3'•jxyti TIGHTENED USING THE TURN-OF-NUT
/ METHOD TO OBTAIN A MINIMUM TENSION
- - - - - I I CLEAN d PAINT ALL ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL BE 1" DIAMETER
EXPOSED STEEL SURFACES _ _ - F436 WASHEROLTS W[TH A563 NUTS AND
USING INTERZONE 954 , ALL WELDS AND WELDING PROCEDURES
NEW 123'; HP12x53 SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
OD PIPE PILE BRACING AWS BRIDGE WELDING CODE D1.5
(SEE PILE TO BRACE CONN. 2 -0 ONLY THE SUBMERGED ARC WELDING (SAW)
DETAILI / / " PROCESS OR SHIELDED METAL ARC
SEE DRAWHOUSE PILE
WELDING (SMAW) PROCESS MAY BE USED.
MUD LINE I �I I I I I CONCRETE ENCASEMENT DIAPHRAM CONNECTIONS AND WELDERS SHALL BE AWS-CERTIFIED
ELEV -10.0' +/- I DETAIL
SCALE '•{ = 1' IN ALL WELDING POSITIONS
ALL FABRICATED STEEL SHALL BE
SHOP-PAINTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CURRENT NORFOLK SOUTHERN
LONGITUDINAL VIEW SPECIFICATIONS USING AN APPROVED
INORGANIC Z[NC-ACRYL[C SYSTEM WITH
PROPOSED ELEVATION OF BENTS BLACK FINISH
SCALE ',.7 ALL WELDS AND WELDING PROCEDURES
SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
AWS BRIDGE WELDING CODE D1.5
ELECTRODES FOR SHIELDED METAL ARC
WELDING SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
OF AWS A5.1 AND SHALL BE OF THE LOW
HYDROGEN CLASSIFICATION
k BASE 5'_0- BEESHIPPEDAF FULLY DASSEMBLED. AND
LL
LATE PA
SOLE PLATES AND LOOSE STIFFENER
PLATES SHALL BE SHIPPED ON PALLETS
IHtBf SE PLA ES S
d TOP FLANGES MATERIAL REQUIRED
1"-9'z 1 -2'z 1 -2'x 2' 1 -2'z I -2 OTY ITEM
1234' OD x 3,B' WALL THICKNESS x 60' PIPE
CAP BEAM PLAN 30 PILE. ASTM A252 GRADE 2. 1.5 TONS EA 45 TONS
SCALE 14' = 1' 20 APF P13006 CONICAL POINT FOR 123," PILE
20 APF S-20000 SPLICER RING FOR 123" PILE
24 20' REBAR CAGE FOR 123,1(' OD PILE 200 LB EA
PIPE PILE CONCRETE. 5000 PSI 36 CU.YD. AFE NO: F-02096
2'-0" 2'-0" 6'-4" 2 -D" gIAPHRAM HP12x53 BRACING. ASTM A572 GRADE 50 100 LF STORE NO: 8045
INTERZONE 954 18 GAL
5 W14x159 x 11'-0" CAP BEAM
SEE DIAPHRAM tt f 60 STIFFENER PLATE BA: 7" x 4' x 1'-
CONNECTION W16x57 STRINGER f + I 4 W16x57 x 9'-2" STRINGER. 523 LB EA 2090 LB
3 DETAIL l 8 W16x57 x 10'-4" STRINGER. 589 LB EA 4710 LB REv BY DATE DESCRIPTION
16 W16x57 x 12'-2" STRINGER. 694 LB EA 11096 LB
>< 3'i SHOCK PAD �= SOLE PLATE 1 �= SOLE PLATE 2 ,, 3 3�.. NORFOLK
° BASE PLATE PA I PAD SHOCK 112 STIFFENER PLATE 5T: 3 " x x 1'-3" SOUTHERN
a W14x159 z z ''{ BASE PLATE PA
a
11'-0.'CAP I� �I 2811'-5" W12x35 DIAPHRAMS, ASTM A36
STIFFENER PLATE BA I 14 3'-5" W12x35 DIAPHRAMS. ASTM A36 PIEDMONT DIVISION
7'x'o x 1,-5j,
,, I 168 L4x4xl " x l'-0" CONNECTION ANGLE
123'° OD PIPE PILE xSTIFFENER I I 8 Imo" X 15" x 2'-9" SOLE PLATE EDBU DISTRICT
INS�ALL REBAR CAGE PLATE ST
d FILL WITH CONCRETE I I 20 I�" x 7" x 2'-9" SOLE PLATE OFFICE OF CHIEF ENGINEER -BRIDGES 6 STRUCTURES ATLANTA,GA
1" CHAI6ER 18 I�" x 15" x 2'-9" BASE PLATE PA
AT CORNERS I 18 PREFORMED FABRIC SHOCK PAD STEEL BENT REPLACEMENT
,- DIA x 6" ASTM A325 BOLT. 1" DIA x 18' ASTM A36 FULLY 1'-3" x 2'-9" x 3," THICK BRIDGE EC-59.3 - NEW BERN, NC
1563 NUT d F436 WASHER HEAVY RHEX NUT HdRWASHER 40 1" DIA x 6" ASTM A325 BOLT, A563
NUT 8 F436 WASHER OVER TRENT RIVER
CAP BEAM AND STRINGER ASSEMBLY 1" DIA x 18" ASTM A36 FULLY THREADED DON JBO VAL REC Nw CVRN):03694 6 03695 MILEPOST EC-59.3
SCALE I'4' = 1' 16 ANCHOR ROD. HEAVY HEX NUT 8 WASHER C,a< IRLE BR0013916 JDATE JULY 17,2015
SHEET NO 3 OF 4 DRAWING NO EC-59.3 15 01

SCHEDULE OF REINFORCING STEEL FOR SCHEDULE OF REINFORCING STEEL
DRAWHOUSE PILE CONCRETE ENCASEMENT FOR BENT CONCRETE ENCASEMENT ADDITION
B
a A QI I A ¢ t'•e DI - ti
U aa I DIA H0LE5
B x 2"tSLOTTED r '
�
TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 1 TYPE 2 I,4' TYP HOLES
NO PC TYPE EST NO PC TYPE EST
PCS SIZE LENGTH MARK NO A B WEIGHT PCS SIZE LENGTH MARK NO A B WEIGHT COPE WEB OF SOLE PLATE 1 SE BASE PLATE PA
BRACE TO
32 u5 5'-3" 501 2 5 -3" 176 37 u5 15'-33.4' 503 1 4'-11.2' 7'-3.4' 592 CLEAR P ILE ¢ 1'•{ DIA �
32 8'-31.2' 502 1 1'-105.8' 1'-1058' 277 6 42'-4" 504 1 17'-7" 7'-2" 265 ¢ 1''6 DIA HOLES
HOLES
MATERIAL REOU I RED FOR 1 40'-83,4' 505 1 4'-1" 32'-63.4' 43 123.4' OD -
DRAWHOUSE PILE ENCASEMENT z 32"-63'4"" 506 z 32'-63'4' 68 PIPE PILE 4 r z z -s z ' z z -s z M
CONCRETE. 5000 PS[ 4 CU YD MATERIAL REQUIRED FOR BENT HP12x53 BRACE SOLE PLATE 1 SF 3/4" SHOCK PAD
REINFORCING STEEL. ASTM A615 GRADE 60 453 LB CONCRETE ENCASEMENT ADDITION PILE TO BRACE CONNECTION DETAIL
CONCRETE. 5000 PSI 16 CU YD
REINFORCING STEEL. ASTM A615 GRADE 60 968 LB I 1'•B DIA ¢ 1'•e DI
x 2" SLOTTED HOLES
HOLES n
2 -5"2
NOTES SOLE PLATE 2 SE SOLE PLATE 2 SF
CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM SLUMP
m OF 4" AND A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE
501 t °t 501 to 0 STRENGTH OF 5000 PSI AT 28 DAYS
ALL SURFACE EDGES SHALL HAVE A 3,4'
o. o. CHAMFER
CONCRETE COVER OVER REINFORCING
_ I STEEL SHALL BE 11'2"
REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO
a a I ASTM A615 GRADE 60
FABRICATION. BENDING, AND PLACEMENT #8 BAR x 1'-4
OF REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT AREMA
5oz 6 502 1 6 GUIDELINES FOR CONCRETE STRUCTURES
AND FOUNDATIONS 123.4' OD PIPE PILE
m CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A WATER-CEMENT
RATIO OF 0.40. A MAXIMUM SLUMP OF PREFABRICATED REBAR
3,411 3". AND A MAXIMUM AGGREGATE SIZE CAGE SIX u6 BARS
DRAWHOUSE PILE OF WITH ss3 TIES
CONCRETE ENCASEMENT SECTION B-B
SCALE '•6" = 1' SCALE '•e = t• CUT 1" x 11.2' DEEP 3 e' D 1 A
NOTCH IN PILE AT CUTOFF GUY WIRE
I I
3'-6° 3'-6°
Z I I 505 I
PLACE THREE 3" DIAL
I 1 I I 1 I SNAP-ON PLASTIC
tiw 503 RINGS EVERY 4TH TIE
e TO MAINTAN
N 11.2' CLEARANCE
4•z 8 2 -t•z 7 a 9' W2 - 7 a 9° 2 0 a- 7 a 9 2'-2° 7 0 9 '1'z 4'z" 504 506
I I I I BAR6LAPIN I I 1 I I I 1 I
I—j 1_1 REBAR CAGE
BENT CONRETE INSTALLATION DETAIL
ENCASEMENT ADDITION SECTION D-D CAGE To EXTEND 10' MIN AFE NO: F-02096
SCALE '•o = t' SCALE '•6° = 1' BELOW GROUND LINE
STORE N0: 8045
1 1 REV By DATE OESCRIPTION
MARK ALL T[ES THIS END _ NORFOLK
1 o'-o 3W SOUTHERN
2 -9'•" 4'-5"• ' z'-9'•"' INSIDE NO PC SIZE HORIZONTAL DIMS BOLT LENGTH
SHOULDER PCS MARK ROUGH PIEDMONT DIVISION
FOR PRE A D LEFT RIGHT EDBU DISTRICT
o+ o+ PLATED TIES 32 1 9" x 10" 1'-31.2' 8'-81'2'
OFFICE OF CHIEF ENGINEER -BRIDGES 6 STRUCTURES ATLANTA,CA
1'2' 1'2 3z ,V 9" x ,o" 1'-31.2' 8'-a1,2' ,3" ,3" CONCRETE ENCASEMENT & MISC DETAILS
STD HOOK
A D BOLTVHOLES BRIDGE EC-59.3 - NEW BERN, NC
NOTE
OVER TRENT RIVER
T I E FRAMING OAK TIES TO MEET CURRENT NORFOLK SOUTHERN ocN JBO VAL REC NW(VRN)03694 6 03695 MILEPOST EC 59.3
DETAIL SPECIFICATIONS DATED MARCH 2005
SCALE A = 1' CHx FILE BROO13916 DATE JULY 17,2015
SHEET NO 4 OF 4 DRAWING NO EC-59.3 15 01