The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20151075 Ver 1_Application_20151014d,w SfA� � '� Q�� .��,,. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT'ION PAT MCCRORY GOVERNOR October l4, 2015 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Field Office 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, NC 28801-5006 ATTN: Mr. Steven Kichefski NCDOT Coordinator NICHOLASJ.TENNYSON SECRETARY Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permits 13 & 33 and Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 39 over Mitchell River on SR 1328 (Haystack Road) in Surry County; Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1328(6); WBS 42330.1.1; Division 11; TIP No. B-5173. Dear Mr. Kichefski: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No. 39 over Mitchell River on SR 1328 (a 78-foot bridge) with a 100-foot box beam b�•idge. The bridge will be located on new alignment, approximately 34 feet downstream, and will span Mitchell River. The project will utilize the existing bridge to maintain traffic while the new bridge is under construction. There will be a total of 68 linear feet (lfl of pe►•manent stream impacts from the placement of bank stabilization, along with 32 lf of temporary impacts associated with the bank stabilization. Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), USFWS Section 7 concurrence letter, stormwater management plan, permit drawings and design plans for the above- i•eferenced project. The Categorical Exclusion (CE) was completed in December 2014 and distributed shortly thereafter. Additional copies are available upon request. This project calls for a letting date of February 16, 2016 and a review date of December 29, 2015; however, the let date may advance as additional funding becomes available. MAILING ADDRESS: TE�EPr+oNE: 919-707-6100 LOCATION: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: 919-212-5785 1020 BIRCH RIDGE DRIVE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS �.yEBSITE: WIMN.NCDOT.GOV RALEIGH NC 2761 O 1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER Rn�eicH NC 27699-1598 A copy of this permit application and its distribution list will be posted on the NCDOT Website at: http://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Bill Barrett at (919) 707-6103. Sincerely, - � ....�__� _ . ��i�� Richard W. Hancock, P.E., Manager Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List �oF,��,rFRQ Office Use Only: � � o c Corps action ID no. � y i ,, , � � � DWQ project no. ° �` Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: � Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes � No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replacement of bridge number 39 on SR 1328 (Haystack Rd.) over Mitchell River. 2b. County: Surry 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Devotion, NC (unincorporated community); Mount Airy, NC 2d. Subdivision name: not applicable 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g_5173 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable applicable): 3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6103 3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785 3h. Email address: wabarrett@ncdot.gov 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: not applicable 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: not applicable 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.434040 Longitude: - 80.916492 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 0.4 acre 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Mitchell River proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: B;Tr,ORW 2c. River basin: Yadkin-Pee Dee 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Rural area; the development in the area is primarily rural agriculture. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 285 within project ROW. 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace a structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridge. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project involves replacing a 78-foot bridge with a 100-foot, single-span bridge on new alignment, approximately 34 feet downstream, utillizing the existing structure to maintain traffic while the new bridge is constructed. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknown Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) (acres) Temporar T Site 1❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 2❑ P � T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 3❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 4❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 5❑ P � T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 6❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts X Permanent X Temporary 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet) Permanent (P) or intermitte (Corps - width Temporary (T) nt (INT)? 404, 10 (feet) DWQ — non-404, other) Site 1� P❑ T bank Mitchell River � PER � Corps 30 68 stabilization ❑ INT � DWQ Site 1❑ P� T Bank Mitchell River � PER � Corps 30 32 stabilization ❑ INT � DWQ Site 3❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 4❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 5❑ P 0 T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 6❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 68 Perm 32 Temp 3i. Comments: 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) type Tempora T 01 ❑P❑T 02 ❑P❑T 03 ❑P❑T 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts X Permanent X Temporary 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or (acres) number purpose of pond Flo Flooded Filled Excavated ode Filled Excavated Flooded d P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an impacts require miti ation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem ora T re uired? B1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B2 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The proposed bridge is 22 feet longer than the existing bridge; the proposed bridge will be at approximately the same grade as the existing structure; the existing bridge will be used to maintain traffic while the new bridge is constructed; 3:1 fill slopes where practicable. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Best Management Practices via the promotion of sheet flow and infiltration with grassed shoulders; Storm drain in SE quadrant outlets to a riprap pad; the ditch in the SW quadrant outlets to riprap embankment to prevent erosion; and cross pipe outlets to pre-formed scour hole (PSH). Additionally, erosion and sedimentation control will adhere to the Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State ❑ Yes � No If no, explain: NCDOT does not propose mitigation for the 68 If of permanent bank stabilization impact at Site 1, as it does 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for not require fill in the stream bed and therefore, under Section impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 404 of the Clean Water Act, does not constitute Loss of Waters of the U.S. and is not subject to compensatory mitigation. Furthermore, the proposed bank stabilization is necessary to prevent erosion and sedimentation by preventing bank destabilization and thereby minimizing im acts to the environment. 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ❑ No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes � No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why. ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: If required from 1 a, see attached buffer permit drawings. 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: See attached permit drawings. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? not applicable ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW (check all that apply): ❑ ORW ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No n/a 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No n/a 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No n/a F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) � Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. not applicable 10 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. � Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? USFWS and NHP websites, and on-site surveys. Of the three species listed for Surry County, there is habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower. The most recent survey was conducted October 28, 2013; and no individuals of this species were identified. Additionally, there is no NHP listing of this species within one mile of the project. Concurrence from USFWS for NLEB was received on September 17, 2015 (letter attached). 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NMFS County Index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NEPA Documentation 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps �� Richard W. Hancock, P.E. .-__ _ �_�, ,-- �� `''� f � : � � s• � �`} Applicant/Agent's Printed Name ��— (� � �_--- - --. _ Date �� Applicant/AgenYs Signature (AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is rovided. � United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Asheville Field Office 160 Zillicoa Street Asl�eville, North Carolina 28801 September 17, 2015 Mr. Richard W. Hancock North Carolina Department of Transportation Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit 1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 Subject: Endangered Species Concurrence for the Proposed Replacement of Bridge No. 39 on SR 1328 over the Mitchell River, Surry County, North Carolina. TIP B-5173, WBS No. 42330.1.1. Dear Richard: We have reviewed your concurrence request and supporting documentation regarding impacts to the federally listed threatened northern long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis) for the subject project. We provide the following comments in accordance with the provisions of section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act). The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No 39 over the Mitchell River. Some habitat for the NLEB exists in the vicinity of the project and has been evaluated for potential impacts from project implementation. According to the information provided, a search for mines and caves was conducted in the project footprint and within a quarter mile of the project and none were found. The existing bridge was checked for bat use and none was observed. Potential summer roosting habitat clearing is estimated at 0.2 acres. Based on the absence of wintering habitat, no evidence of bat use on the existing structure, and NCDOT's commitment to restrict tree cutting to the time from August 15 to April 15 (of any year) we agree that implementation of this project is "not likely to adversely affect" NLEB in the project area. In view of this, we believe the requirements under Section 7(c) of the Act are fulfilled. However, obligations under Section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered i£ (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is subseguently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action. If you have questions about these comments, please contact Ms. Marella Buncick of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 237. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log No. 4-2-15-403. Sincerely, - - o�^iginal signed - - Janet Mizzi Field Supervisor k li,t;h7� E1�' North Carolina Department of Transportation � :5r1[ltltlbViiTf C M ,.._, Highway Stormwater Program �j STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.01; Released December 2014) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 42330.1.1 TIP No.: B-5173 County(ies): Surry Page 1 of 2 General Project Information WBS Element: 42330.1.1 TIP Number: B-5173 Project T pe: Bridge Replacement Date: 5/27/2015 NCDOT Contact: Galen Cail, PE Contractor / Designer. Galen Cail, PE/Craig Lee, PE Address: 1020 Birch Ridge Dr. Address: 1020 Birch Ridge Dr. Raleigh, N.C. 27610 Raleigh, N.C. 27610 Phone: 919.707.6711 Phone: 919.707.6711 /919.707.6708 Email: cail ncdot. ov Email: cail ncdot. ov/c'lee ncdot. ov CitylTown: Devotion, NC Count ies : Sur River Basin s: Yadkin-Pee Dee CAMA County? No Wetlands within Project Limits? No Pro'ect Description Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 0.16 Surrounding Land Use: Fields Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro'ect Built-Upon Area ac. 0.4 ac. 0.3 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: 9' Travel Lanes, 4' Grass Shoulders. 2:1-4:1 Side Slopes 9' Travel Lanes, 2' Grassed Shoulders, 2:1-4:1 Side Slopes Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Design/Future: 254 Year: 2036 Existin : 174 Year: 2016 General Project Narrative: The project consists of replacing Bridge# 39 on SR 1328 (Haystack Road) over Mitchell River. The approach work will consist of providing grass shoulders and guardrail.Bridge (Description of Minimization of Water #39 existing single span structure (77.5' total length) will be replaced with 1@ 100' - 39" Box Beam. Quality Impacts) Best Mgmt. Practices: -Promotion of sheet flow and infiltration with grassed shoulders. -Storm Drain in SE quad outlets to rip rap pad. -Ditch in SW quad outlets to rip rap on embankment to prevent erosion. -Cross pipe outlets to preformed scour hole Waterbody Information Surface Water Body (1): Mitchell River NCDWR Stream Index No.: 12-62-(1) NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class B Supplemental Classification: (ORW) Trout Waters (Tr) Other Stream Classification: Impairments: None Threatened/Endangered Species? No Comments: NRTR Stream ID: Mitchell River Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? N/A Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) 1 31�;31�t'�lw° North Carolina Department of Transportation �'��.117��"�� Highway Stormwater Program '�';,I STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.01; Released December 2014) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 42330.1.1 TIP No.: B-5173 Count ies : Surry Pa e 2 of 2 Preformed Scour Holes and Energy Dissipators Drainage Pipe/Structure BMP Sheet Station (Road Projects) or Surface Energy Dissipator Area Conveyance Dimensions Q10 V10 Associated w/ No. Coordinates (Non-Road Projects) Water Bod Type Riprap T pe ac Structure (in) (cfs) (fps) Buffer Rules? 4 -L-STA.19+35RT (1)Mitchell pSH Class'B' 9.4 Pipe 30 17.0 1.7 N/A River Additional Comments ' Refer to the NCDOT Best Management Practices Toolbox (2014), NCDOT Standards, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 14 (HEC-14), Third Edition, Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipators for Culverts and Channels (July 2006), as applicable, for design guidance and criteria. � s � � � � � � � � � � � � � z C7 � �� , �� u� �� z �� W tA t� �� »� �� [» i» � � � � .� � V �,� O �C � � � � � � V � � � V � � O V / See Sheet 9-A For Index of Sheets See Sheet 9-E7 For Conventional Symbols �See Sheet 9-C i= or Survey Control Sheets Lens Knob Mtn. �, Elev. 2188 >� END PROJE T SR V`�`�� ,� Bs �,�� er DEVOTION BEGIN PROJECT s�, ��, S� o� , �� 1�� SURRY COUI�TY LOCATION: BRIDGE 11to. 39 0111 SR 1328 (HAYSTACK RD) OVER MITCHELL RIVER TYPE OF WORK: GRADI11tG, DRAI11lAGE, PAVIIVG, STRUCTURE �,� Mill SR 133� � � 0� 1325 '��j 5�� rP �322 � I � �wol SR ,� Pi o„ �/�/ETLAN D AN D�� U RFAC E WATE R 1 V�0 UNTAIN PARK y I$ � �,A � � � �315 � �R ��s � ZEPHYR � � T�ICI11tITY MAP �� ' ,� /-� I I � I� -L ES D BR+DGE _ , � � � � � �_ - - � _ ' � � � � _� �- � / . �R� �,� A d� � ,,��' �T��K� T " r 1 � � u�Y�� - ; , , , �� — J _ � - ;i," �— � IIV�P�CTS ,� i � i � ��, ,'o'" � o� 1 z� i� i�� i � � o� i �'� ,�, /�� ' J° ,,--_ , -, =, � , ��. BEGI11t T.I.P. PROJECT B-5173 � � � � � � �� —L— STA.11 + 94.53 � � �� i �� / �� i / � � �' � � � � / � � � � I i� � � , �\ � �pNi� \ � /ip�J�i�`�\� �\� � � .�0� � � �� \ � � �� / �� / BEGIN BRIDGE -L- STA.16 + 70.88 PERMIT �� \ . � �� \� \ �� \ � � � � ��,�; � � � END T.I.P. PROJECT 8-5173 ' ��'<< �� _ � ��o —L— STA. 20 + 25. 00 � �� F � �� \ � �A THIS IS NOT A CONTROL OF ACCESS PROJECT. �� \\ THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES, BUT LIES WITHIN ' � \� \ THE BOUNDARIES OF DEVOTION RURAL HISTORIC DISTRICT (SR 859). \ � ** DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR DESIGN SPEED OF 25 MPH. \ , �lE��b,II�IN.�1I8� ]�]LAN� DO NOT [1SE FOR CONSTRUCTION / CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. � � HYDRAULICS ENGINEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIG11l DATA PROJECT LENGTH PrePo�ed in tne office ot: ADT 2016 = 174 DIVISI0111 OF HIGHWAYS 50 25 0 50 l0o ADT 2036 = 254 LENGTH ROADWAY T.I.P. PROJECT B-5173 = 0.138 MI i000 s,.�n Ridge nr., aate�gh xc, z�6io �� w�� DHV = �O % � 2012 STANDARD SPECIF7CATIONS �a�° "�e PLANS � � D = 6O % I P.E. � < LENGTH STRUCTURE T.I.P. PROJECT B-5173 = 0.019 MI s,cxAronE: �� 50 25 0 50 loo T— 5 ��a * RIGHT OF WAY DATE: JASON MOORE, PE ° ** V= 55 MPH FEBRUARY 27, 2015 rnorECZ sxc�,vEEa ROADWAY DESIGN �� PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST =2% DUAL 3% ENGINEER �� p��as� TOTAL LENGTH OF T.I.P. PROJECT B-5173 = 0.157 MI LETTING DATE: NYA K. BOAYUE, PE �O S O �O ?O FUNC CLASS = RURAL LOCAL PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER FEBRURAY 16, 2016 � PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB REGIONAL TIER `'E S/GNATURE: olK � � � � EN � � � � � � �j z SKETCH SHOWING BRIDGE /ROADWAY RELATIONSHIP APPROACI-I SLAB APPROACH SLAB L- STA, 16+59088 -L- STA� R+84e13 � � � TYPE-III N TYPE-III � � � BEG'N BRIDGE -_- S f A� 16+70,88 � � \+ � \+ s� �+ � _ � � � �� ,s� �� I GRASS \ � y� + I�\\ \}. GRASS � � �V �+ � ��+ � a a �—� � \k, I /C� � fJ�\ �\ I / � tt � \�E II /� � GftASS � IGg I I �pN� / � / /VY I C7 / �` J�/ � � � / � � / � ..•. / �( ��v TIE TO /�� "� E%ISTING DITCH � M`� \ p� � � � �� / /—��cqq� ��`;A �� /sR �%� � � 1 � � �p, � � �� STP�K� � \ �� j/ �� lo j A \ � j/ • \ � / � �� A � \ \ \ � � � � � � � � � �`4Y \ �DENOTES IMPARS IN SURFACE WATER �DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER ;� n � �? TYPE—I I I N END BRIDG� —L— STA, 17+73,13 —�— � S�O. 17f8%E S ITE 1 � 15' � _ / 15 / / �- SEE DETAIL A 100' 0' 100' ■ � ■ ■ ■ �_..�� .� � � . GRAPI-�tL SCALE � �l \ � � y� � I I ,y GRASS �i il /.. .. /�S � � � I / �� . � DRAI � � � _ � F � ,� � � AD - DRA�� i � j�.� `x � �� , � «. �� a � � E E SEE DETAIL B CLA55 II RIP RAP to Appron. Elev. - 1351.1' STRUCTURE PAY /TEM - DETAIL G RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT , �o„o =�e�e, s. Dit<h — 1.5' Grode Georextile J� o' Type o! Liner� Closs I Rip-ROp � IS Tons Geotex'ile 35 s FROM STA.16+65 TO STA.17+Od RT � � � � � canss �TEMPORARY SURFACE WATER IMPACTS �i� r—�� SEE DETAIL A / �` k \ RAI\ �— �\ \ —_� .\G� - (c �� _ �� , -\ — � E F �, TEMPO RY SURFAC�EE ��, WATER IMPACTS DETAIL O�, I R4P R 9etil F \ PSH � � P � �� "� ��\ � � � �oRN F�E�o ��S CL B RIP RAP -1 TON \ \ Geotexfile -5 SY �� 15" Ali. Pipe w/El6ows \ \ � \ coRN Fie�o � Pipe or �i�ch owiei L Sq�ore Preloi Scour Hole (F ^R'ip Rap in bosin shawn For <lori � �� P� � i i� � o � �j' D�P i �0/s"� /� k �� / I � /� x / � �� _� �io , ,� ^\"�i � � � �1 ' � . � � . / / . / /I . ,� � `l`s� ` \\ E �'��_ A u� �,c ��. � \\. ;r\ PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE 'NOT TO SCALE PLAN VIEW RM' SHEET NO. DWAY DESIGN HYDRAULIC ENGINEER ENGINEER PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 6 INSTALL LEVEL AND FLUSH WITH NATURAI GROUND J SECTION A-A �� PIPE �d = 30") S�� F D PSRM � INFIOW NAT RAL _ ��I 1 R U LINER: CLA55 B RIPRAP -- � 9�1 WIiH FILTER FABRIC 1...�� 7UCK STA. 19 + 33 B=5 � D=1fl W_o � iD8 \ \ � s� � � ^ \ � � � \\ \\ \ � \ \\\ \ \ ✓�\ � �S � \ �� s \J \ S\ �'��'s �\ \ \ \ \ \ � PAVEMENT��tEI�OVAL \ � SEE SHEET b FOR\PRGIFILE Z ` O � w � � 5 � � c� � � EN � � � u> cv � �j � Z � SKETCH SHOWING BRIDGE /ROADWAY RELATIONSHIP APPROACI-I SLAB APPROACH SLAB L- STA, 16+59088 -L- STA� R+84e13 �\ � TYPE-III N TYPE-III s -� - � °, �J _� � _ �l � � �3 � �� P� � RM' SHEET NO. DWAY DESIGN HYDRAULIC ENGINEER ENGINEER YPE—III �� TYPE—III � � � i `� � � � �} ; E�o�" PERMIT DRAWING END BRIDG� �- STA� ��+73,�3 � k,'�°%�� SHEET 3 OF 6 � .. . - . I„ / . BEGW BRID�E _ L- STA, 16+70 88 � ' � � / l ' � i �,�� i � � � - - S�O.O�g7�6 r �� ! � � ,� �k / e`' � � ��. � � V�\�, ' — _. - � �, � �-.,,, i — � . � _,� , ,; � � � � �3<, Q � ,� /_ _' / � � � � � � -- �' � �' " � - = , � � �� A� �i V��\ � � � , �\.`, �A �. ��.��A��v� / � :6 , , \ � �,�� , , , , I , � y �� :� � � — � '--�.i� � � I � — 1 ' � ' � � � / � � ) - � � � a, �� " �� , � � � ��s - � � � � � � � \ \ A �A\\\\\\\ �� I \�A=�aVA\\\\°;� A � - .,,, � �� ( � _i- �u,e I \� � / l � r/.�: J j. � �. �� " � � I �.�' i�'� W TEOR MPAC SRFACE 9 � �, � � '�'iI I ` .�. \\ \'�\ ��\��\"' \\ \ � ` \ . /_ � � / ,- !��J �� %° r° / - - � ��''� 4'��r� , � �i �� ` . � \�° \\\� �� —�'�! �� _��.� / � ��i ! � �Rass � � 1 � ; o q � �' ' �\ V � V� �A\\�� \\ �mA �� \: --- ��-- — � , � � � � - SITE�� --� =� � �,�� , � � �� s,��a�� . — __,� I � 1 � `="' V .� � ,s / �1 � —, ! �)5' ... E SEE DETAIL � I _ � � \ � ( . � A �� o � y ��' ,. ' / � v � � 1 � ��9 v � � � '' � � �� , ' I � � � X-= �F � � l � /� I \ �� ' \ � � �� \\\V�� , �\v /� � '�� , �,.: _��/ \ I / ` 1 I $. / / — \ I ` �.. I `� •/ - — . �.. 'U -_=� � RA,N..�.�\\.., � _ . \�°, I �I';r � I�III�, 1,�.,; \ �l, � \ � \\ \\ \\\\\ \\\\\c\\\\\\\\ \�\ \� i � � ' � _ � ' I ) {^ 1 � 1 / J / }�� , \ � I \ � I ` � \ ( . . ; / , , )5 ' � � , � ' � � � � _ � \ G R4 " � I I / � � / \', � � � � � \ � \ � \ � \� \\\ \\ \ ''\ \\ \`\ 1 . � � m J / � � � s` ;. , �� ,�'� , �39"S � / �� `\ , � , .,, �,� , 1 � , ,— �`, I ` �� \ _ � � �, , � : , , = ( \ / + � � � `, f5— p� � , � ,� �,�.�� r I�; �� , �� \�� \\ �1\1� ; � � � i � — �" ` '`'', ' . - � �� A : � v . ` � � � � � �� i �' � � �- A . � A � � \ � � / � \ � \ � � : l, �i'' _ _ _ �-„�" /� /� REM�Q`/E ( '� \ \ � s : � `' ` � ' � 1 ; �-- _ �w ,_ — ,—�'`�" .�., —� 4 <;e\�l _, � — � \ � ��m \�\ �x�� q � \ / � ` f 1 rrSi� / � "` / . i � � ` j / X v ��. � / /r � -�". ' � �4VC v�,,,� � � — � `� v � � � � � � �� V � � ��-�V�� \ �a = � � _ t ,. � �� 3 - � � � , 1.i ��s , � � �, , �� ,� � i �� i�� -��= �� _ - � ; � �� '� � � � � �� `�� --- � , \ - `� e �� \ �� A��A� �� I � �� O ` -T � � � � v �, A � � � � j �. GR S � , � � - � � . . 1�M ARY SURFACSEE \• � \ �\ � � � \ \ \ \\ \ `\ � \ Y I � / . .. ' ./ / : � . �. �-` . WATER I PACTS �� \ � `.. ��.. \ \\ \ \ \ � ` \ � \ \\\ \ � . �-<'��3 � —� � +.*� � � � � � � �� i E ss �kae B � � �'� °rsrAia O�' �� ;� � � � � � �s � � � � �`,!I /, �\�, , cRa'ss x ,/ /�; � �,/� E E � ��\\ \ � � \ �� \� �� 11 \1�`��\\\\ � � � % z�� , "�� ",.. � � ;r�� 1�� / � � � ' ,�� i .� � � \�- �. ��' �� , �v � __ . �� 1 �� 1� V � � � : � � "�'� _� � '�'� ' � ,, � -- � .._ F � .x i l �A � � �/ .� . � �� \ \ �� \ �\ ` \� � a � � �' � �+ '' �� / � /�� '' � `�,� � ` � � �. �� \ � F � �,„� � �'!� , � � � �� `.� V� yj I � � �\k I �� Z� / �, E ! . .. hEE DETAIL B � `,. - - � a\ �� >` � `` \,\ , `� � � \\ �� \\ � �f �7 f/ . {3>� �� \. / � � � .� r ' - CLA55 II RIP RAP �� . � �f � � � , . \ r � \\ \ � t��, /b � d �� X X � � � � coRN Fie�� ' � � � �„� I � �;;�"' ,� - / � .., i toAppron.Elev � 73511 I \� .\ \�\ .\..\\\ -' � � \\ � ��} 0j� � > � \ � , ' � � �/ -a STROCTURE PAY /TEM , \ � � �� - \ � � 1 _ � � �\ \ \\\\ � I �� ' / � � �� `��/j E / 1 / ' — — c� s Rld ana —i toni \ `\ � ` � `:'�� _ I � � ` ��.1 � \P '�II i i \ esr ` � / / � / ' cor�N FiE�o 'S�ea�Pfde s sv � \ \ �\ , �\� �\ �� \ _ --- � �\ \ � '\��1 III / � GRASS ' �3 /� � �� ' SEE�DETAI��R � . !�! pe w/EI6ow5 . \ �� .... • � \\ \\ ' �\�� _� �� \ �m, \ m I S/� TIE TO \ I ON� % i E%ISTING DIiCH / � \ �� J _ � �„II � � l � �� i � / i � � � � �� '�� _ � � �' �� , � � — = �� V�\\V� \�`� � �� ° � � 5 � � � � 4 �� a�� ' � � � / f '_ - � ' `�`�, � _ ' A � � V A�� \ �\\ �� t�� / � A � � � �A � �� \ �� \ I ' II I� � � l f �i�� ) V � , � � � � � � � � �—� j � �e ��.,� / � �� \ � � �� s,� � ' �� \� A\�� ''' � r � � _ � � ��'�w � � r�'� ,� / � / 1 i `� �� 1 � •�`�� V`� � �� ,��o� \ � � _ � ��—� � �� , � � R ;j � , :4`F ' � � �\ l �� ,,. - , � — � � � �� '` � � \�� \`' � � � \ � � ��`� � �� \\ � �� ' ' � , , -� ;� � . ��j.: �.� t� � � � V� - �� , �'1 � i, . A� �V' �, `, � �� ;A��A V��:A � � � , �� `+�r' _ ��K � � � � � � � � VV�_ � � �RN RE� �� \ , � � � �� . �� H�S � ' � � �e � e � � �� V . � ��. �� V I ��- - i � _ 3- I p � . � � v '� �� /�� A ^� '� f � / � � _�� / 3,� � � � � � : 'I � � � s \\ � � �� 1 \\� � ` \�� . �� s� i< < \ \ �, / ' � � � /,�"/ � , V A � A � � �woaos,� �� A� \ � � ��, �, �� , ��, � � � i� � � � � � �� '�' — �'� � � � � � ' ��'�� ,� '�� ,�. �, � �.s,�� ✓�� l � � � '- �'�� \ V� l I I �e � - -,_�-� �:- � �� ,L � �,�.,�� l� � 1 \,�� :, s� � �� , � ��'� `'��V'�y� ��V� � ��.�; . - / � 1 � � � 1 � l � �� ) � �`l �_ � � � � � -- � — � � 1 � � � v v � =�� ,�� y v � ( � � � ��I � PREF.ORM�D SCQUR H � \ � � , � � � � � �� 1 � � aM'�/� � �� j � , � �_ A � � ��A �•�; A�� , . � � � V A, � � � � � � � OlE � � � �� \ � � � � �� `� �� *NOT TO SCALE s \ \ � \ PLAN VIEW J� \ " \ � - \ \ � WITH LNATURAIGROUND \ � \ \ VA / \ � V A i R r�. � \ �� s �'� � � � � �"t DETAIL C oP�i�o`oi��n� :.s� � � RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT '\ , �o„o =�e�e� � J JS\ s Dit<h —�5 \ � Grode Georextile J� � DENOTES IMPARS IN sq�a,e r.elo,med � SURFACE WATER 100' 0' 100' �� s�o��Hole (asH� \\ \J` (R'ip Rap in bosin '�S\\ .: �� ■ , Type olLiner� Closs IRip-ROp � IS Tons notshawn For<lorify� Se w � � DENOTES TEMPORARY ceo+e.��le as 5 e. IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER GRAPI-i4C SCALE FROM STA.16+65 TO STA.17+Od RT B=5 H \ D=1fl \ W=0 H \� \ SECTION A-A �J' �� PIPE �d = 30'� �, \ ( S�� F D PSRM � INFLOW NAT RAL � _ ... 1 R U � LINER: CLA55 B RIPRAP -- � 9�1 1/ �\ \ WIiH FILTER FABRIC MIN 1' iUCK N aa � PAVEMENT��tE/�OVAL 5TA19+33 SEE SHEET b FOR\PRbFILE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :CC�CC�CCC:�CC:C:::: :��E�Ee6:::::::� : .� ... :...:::::::::: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :::::::::�C::::::::� E ��;;'�uuu�� C°'u'C7�CC�C7►.id'r ...,...�■��v■■.�.■■ .v.:..�w. �:� I�v: CC5 :C�CCS;�� n��:: - �.�. iiu�u�w�c�i3i7iu ■ ��u�� i iu�� GII�� Onnn��74e:Jr'�� IS�Rl��L4f.I.lEO �U�J V �� r�rr��aA�� WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 -L- 16+90-17+10 Bank Stabilization < 0.01 < 0.01 68 32 TOTALS*: < 0.01 < 0.01 68 32 0 *Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts NOTES: 2013 10 24 � � � � T -o � rv� ti m / o•o �, �� o� � �� O 3 N � � O Q� �� -� � � � � ., � V W O QC � � � �O � 0 V � � � V � � O V See Sheet 9-A For Index of Sheets See Sheet 9-B For Conventional Symbols See Sheet 1-C For Survey Control Sheets �. � \ � � --__ r_� BEGIN T.I.P. PR� -L- STA. Il + 94.53 � � � �— —�� / �� i �� / �, �' � � � � � � � �� I i �� / � � � �V�� /��IDi�\�\� � � .�0� � � � �� \\ i � � \ � �� 5�� `� �II� ��YS SURRY COUI�TY LOCATION: BRIDGE No. 39 ON MITCHELL RIVER 1328 (HAYSTACK TYPE OF WORK GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVIIVG, STRUCTURE � , �, , �, . !�� . _ � ; ,�, ,�- - � � - ; �� ,� ! _ - � �, �: � , - - , �� - ' � Rp _> ��K � • � -c , � � Nays� � 'R 32a' � s , ,� , � —L— STA.16 + 70.88 \ \\� ,�'Q \ � � � . „ �, : \ � , �� '\.�, � .� •\ , � � \ � \ E111D T.I . , \ ��TCy \ \ �� . \ �� 92�� \ �O � ' � �,o� '. PROJECT B-5173I -L- STA. 20 + 25.00 . \ � � ��j��S'�� '�� '. \\ � THIS IS NOT A CONTROL OF ACCESS PROJECT. -, � \�\ THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES, BUT LIES WITHIN � �. \� \ THE BOUNDARIES OF DEVOTION RURAL HISTORIC DISTRICT (SR 859). � \ � ** DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR DESIGN SPEED OF 25 MPH. \ , PRELIMINARY PLANS DO hOT USN, F'OR CONSTRUCTION CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. ' Prepared in Me Office of: HYDRAULICS ENGINEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH ADT 2016 = 174 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 50 25 0 50 l00 ADT 2036 = 254 LENGTH ROADWAY T.I.P. PROJECT B-5V3 = 0.138 MI �aoo a�r�n xzage Dr., nare�gh ,vc, z�e�o 4E�F NOBppC� DHV = 10 % 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICAT70NS op 9p' PLANS � � D = 60 % P'E' y . SIGNATURE: aa 50 25 0 50 loo T= 5 %* LENGTH STRUCTURE T.I.P. PROJECT B-5173 = 0.019 MI RIGHT OF WAY DATE: JASON MOORE, PE '. a ** V= 55 MPH FEBRUARY 27. 2015 rao�scr ExcrxEEn ROADWAY DESIGN �RgP Q�.! PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST =2% DUAL 3% ENGINEER OF TpAy�9e TOTAL LENGTH OF T.I.P. PROJECT B-5173 = 0.157 MI LETTING DATE: NYA K. BOAYUE, PE �O rJ O �O 2O FUNC CLASS = RURAL LOCA PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER FEBRURAY 16, 2016 PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB REGIONAL TIER PE SIGNATURE: Note: Not to Scale *S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.• State Line County Line Township Line City Line Reservation Line Property Line Existing Iron Pin Property Corner Property Monument Parcel/Sequence Number Existing Fence Line Proposed Woven Wire Fence Proposed Chain Link Fence Proposed Barbed Wire Fence Existing Wetland Boundary Proposed Wetland Boundary Existing Endangered Animal Boundary Existing Endangered Plant Boundary Known $oil Contamination: Area or $ite — Potential Soil Contamination: Area or Site — � 0 EiP � O i23 —X x x— e e � — — — — x L B — — — — wLB EeB EPB � � � �% BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE.• Gas Pump Vent or WG Tank Cap O Sign � Well ° Small Mine 'SZ� Foundation � Area Outline 0 Cemetery 0 Building � School � Church � Dam HYDROLOGY.• Stream or Body of Water Hydro, Pool or Reservoir Jurisdictional Stream Buffer Zone 1 BufFer Zone 2 Flow Arrow Disappearing Stream Spring Wetland Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch False Sump �----J —�s — BZ 1 BZ 2 �... — �... — O�_...�, � � � � F� m �� CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS RAILROADS.• Standard Gauge �sX ,R� RR Signal Milepost MILEPo T 35 Switch 0 SWlrCH RR Abandoned � � �- �- RR Dismantled -------- RIGHT OF Wf1Y.• Baseline Control Point O Existing Right of Way Marker � Existing Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line � Proposed Right of Way Line with � Iron Pin and Cap Marker Proposed Right of Way Line with � Concrete or Granite R�W Marker Proposed Control of Access Line with � Concrete GA Marker Existing Control of Access � A;—�— Proposed Control of Access � Existing Easement Line --E-- Proposed Temporary Construction Easement - e Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement TDE Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement PDE Proposed Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement pue Proposed Permanent Utility Easement Pue Proposed Temporary Utility Easement Tue Proposed Aerial Utility Easement quE Proposed Permanent Easement with O Iron Pin and Cap Marker � ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES.• Existing Edge of Pavement Existing Curb ----- Proposed Slope Stakes Cut --- �--- Proposed Slope Stakes Fill --- F--- Proposed Curb Ramp CR Existing Metal Guardrail Proposed Guardrail r T T T Existing Cable Guiderail n n � Proposed Cable Guiderail � � n n Equality $ymbol 0 Pavement Removal � i�EGETATION.• Single Tree 4� Single Shrub o Hedge M^^�-^^�.^^M^r""� Woods Line �""'-' Orchard Vineyard EXISTING STRUCTURES.• MAJOR: Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall - MINOR: Head and End Wall Pipe Cubert Footbridge Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or 16 Paved Ditch Gutter Storm Sewer Manhole $torm Sewer UTILITIES.• POWER: Existing Power Pole Proposed Power Pole Existing Joint Use Pole Proposed Joint Use Pole Power Manhole Power Line Tower Power Transformer U/G Power Cable Hand Hole H-Frame Pole Recorded lVG Power Line Designated WG Power Line (S.U.E.*) TELEPHONE: WATER: Water Manhole OO Water Meter o Water Valve � �? 4 �? C3 Water Hydrant � wr,erora Recorded U/G Water Line • Designated WG Water Line (S.U.E.*� - - - -•- - - - Above Ground Water Line A�c wa.e� CONC � CONC WW I � CONC HW >----------C �CB OO s • • O �/ r �� Existing Telephone Pole � Proposed Telephone Pole � Telephone Manhole O Telephone Booth ❑' Telephone Pedestal ❑O Telephone Cell Tower � lVG Telephone Cable Hand Hole HH Recorded U/G Telephone Cable � Designated U/G Telephone Cable (S.U.E.*) — - - - -�- - - - Recorded U/G Telephone Conduit *� Designated U/G Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.*� - - - -��- - - - Recorded U/G Fiber Optics Cable T�� Designated U/G Fiber Optics Cable (S.U.E.*� - - - -T �°- - - N: N Satellite Dish CC TV Pedestal ❑O N Tower � WG TV Cable Hand Hole HH Recorded U/G N Cable �° Designated U/G N Cable (S.U.E.*) - - - -��- - - - Recorded U/G Fiber Optic Cable �° °� Designated U/G Fiber Optic Cable (S.U.E.*r ----�� F�- -- GAS: Gas Valve � Gas Meter � Recorded U/G Gas Line ° Designated U/G Gas Line (S.U.E.*) - - - -�- - - - Above Ground Gas Line A.c ca� SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary Sewer Manhole OO Sanitary Sewer Cleanout 0+ U/G Sanitary Sewer Line s� Above Ground Sanitary Sewer A�c sa��+o�Y Sewer Recorded SS Forced Main Line Fss Designated SS Forced Main Line (S.U.E.*) — - - - -F�s- - - - MISCELLANEOUS: Utility Pole Utility Pole with Base Utility Located Object Utility Traffic $ignal Box Utility Unknown U/G Line U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Underground $torage Tank, Approx. Loc. — A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Geoenvironmental Boring U�G Test Hole (S.U.E.*) Abandoned According to Utility Records End of Information • O O ❑s z�.� 0 usT 0 � � AATUR E.O.I. � � � � � ,� � � � � � � �� - _� N� ��- o�� _� o �. � 3L ��( � Qo- �� o� �R T�E Y C 01�TR OL SHEE T 8-�173 o�sco No��Ti-� ————— ——— — ———— — ——————— �) 9817470�533 �) 982442e58°�4 � ) ��324�7 e 7715 EIST E�EVRTION � ST�TIQN OFF�ET — ———— ———— — —— ———— — —————— — — ———— ————— ——— ———— — —— —— 14?584�07144 1363038 OUTSIDE PROJECT �IMITS 14�622�e786� 1355e34 17�83e5� 61083 �I 14366°2e1D13 1352e19 OUTSIDE PROJECT �IMITS BM*�1 E�EVRTION = 135�013' N �8235�o E 14361670 � SI�TION 16�850�� 5�' �EFT DISK IN HEqDWR�� 145 HLZ 176°� I I� �v I � I I _---a �-'— ; �' ► y.r-—-- , / ' /� � � - - — � � /� � i' �� i ' � ��K R ,, , NPYS , , � , ..-, ,- , , , 32a , ' ► ' , �' � , -'SR -' ,. BEGl1� T.I.P.PROJECT 8-5173 �'�----------- ,,-�' ,�-'� � -L- STA. Il + 94.53 � � , - , - , - , - , - , - 1� = 981923. 7136 - ' � � ' � , — , — E = 1435�30.3882 � � � , , , , , , � , , , , � � � � � � � � � � � �� ,-'� BEGI11l BRIDGE ' � ` � � � -L- STA. l6 + 70.88 i � � � � / � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �\ �� ----� � � �� i � � ' � � � � � i� �� '� �� ' i � � � ,, �- � � � i , -.��o -, , � , � �-�O - �, � � , ,O ' � _ , , � ; , �, , ,� � ' O � � � ,- , � � � - 'C � � � /-'/ ,� � � � �� " ` � ��i �� \ �� \ � � \ � � � I I 1 I I I � / 1 / ,� �� DATUM DESCRIPTION THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY NCDOT FOR MONUMENT "B3911-2" WITH NAD 83 STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES OF NORTHING: 983048.524(ft) EASTING: 1437903.644(ft) TH ALL ELEVATION: 1331.092 (ft) E AVERAGE COMBINED GRID FACTOR USED ON THIS PROJECT (GROUND TO GRID) IS: 0.99997301 THE N.C. LAMBERT GRID BEARING AND LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM "B3911-2" TO -L- STATION 11+94.53 IS S 60°18'56" W 2271.33' LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL DISTANCES VERTICAL DATUM USED IS NAUD88 n NOTES: PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-5173 1—C Location and Survevs 1. THE CONTROL DATA FOR THIS PROJECT CAN BE FOUND ELECTRONICALLY BY SELECTING PROJECT CONTROL DATA AT: HTTP://WWW.NCDOT.ORG/DOH/PRECONSTR UCT/HIGHWAY/LOCATION/PROJECT/ THE FILES TO BE FO UND ARE AS FOLLOWS: B5173_LS_CONTROL. TXT SITE CALIBRATION INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT. IF FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED, PLEASE CONTACT THE LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT. � INDICATES GEODETIC CONTROL MONUMENTS USED OR SET FOR HORIZONTAL PROJECT CONTROL BY THE NCDOT LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT. PROJECT CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM. NETWORK ESTABLISHED FROM NGS ONLINE POSITIONING SERVICE (OPUS) SEE GPS CALIBRATION SHEET FOR HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL COORDINATE VALUES. E1�D BRIDGE -L- STA.17 + 73.13 — — _ � — — � — — — — � � � � � \ � \ � � \ � , , � �� , � � ' E1�D T.I.P. PR OJECT 8-�173 � � � �, ' � � � ` � � � -L- STA. 20 + 2�.00 � '� � � � � , . � � . � �_ � � � `� , . � � � � �'. � � E _ .., � , �' '�� `� � � � �� ., � �.� �� , � � � ` �j ` � .� � �� .\ .\ \ \ � \ � .\ \ \\ \ �/TC ' � \ \ \ \ .� ,�,��.,� � % � , � �i�� '�' ' � � ,\ ��,0\ � � � y, � � � �, ., ,, ,, \ �, \ ._ \ �� . �� '. � � � `� � -.\ � � � � � � �� ,\ � , � \ \ 1�C DOT GPS STA TI01� B3911 1 L�CALIZED PROIECT COORDI1�lATES 1� _ E_ 982398. 75'8� 1437063. 7887 NOTE: DRAWING NOT TO SCALE 1�C DOT GPS STA TI01� 83911-2 LOCALIZED PRO JECT COORDII�A TES 1� _ E_ 983048.5240 l43 7903. 6440 982449.��38 1436490.3�20 N Z � N i W � � r � J W v � Q � � W � z � � � � � Y °o m O 0 v � � � W � �° � � O j W � � \ � \ � Z O � , > � � � � � � � � � � �1 i_� � � � � -,�, �, �I �� L� �- � O � � O �; L� -�� ,�� O �� N3� � z �� o ��- �� orr SKETCH SHOWING BRIDGE /ROADWAY RELATIONSHIP APPROACH SLAB ,-L- STAo 16+59088 � BEGIN BRIDGE -L- STAo 16+70088 ARCADIA LLC. DB 600 PG 649 \� �� S � ��, �� BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-5173 �-�-��s� —L— STA. 11 + 94.53 \ � Y � �� -L - PC Sto. ll +42.98 ' _ � � -�� -�-� � � �- GRASS X � � � ��,.� , � � � � X +� �, � � �� (E) � � � � � � � � � � �� \ � \ ��X—i� � � �� }\� \� � � l � � esT � _ � � � � �RASS � � � �-B�- 4 POT oN � l /2 � � �� I � � � � � � �� MP � � �� o � I� / , � �, � / � �� / � � �� 2� � < � ��`� � /�R �� / � � � �� BEGIN CON��. � � � � � / N Py S� � -L ll t,54.23 � , � � s �/ , � / \ �is�� To / � ✓� • ` � _ —. � � � -L - POT Sto. l0 DO NOT DISTURB WHITE PINE TREES -L- STA.11+50 TO 14+00 AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER �, APPROACH SLAB -L- STAo 17+8qe13 /END BRIDGE -L- STAo 17+73013 —L — PC Sto. 17+87.66 � + o - O -L - PT Sto. l5 +26.4/ -B�- 5 PINC -E3Y1- ( '�OT DO NOT DISTURB STREAM BANK AND TREE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER TlE TO EXIST. W/W FENCE / �5� / � ,.,,,,..,-,.� ,,. � � � FROM STA. 12 + 00 TO STA. 16 + 00 RT FROM STA. 16 + 00 TO STA. 16 + 70 RT FROM STA. 19 + 00 TO STA. 19 + 41 LT FROM STA. 16 + 65 TO STA. 17 + 04 RT —L— Pl Sto 11+68.76 Pl Sto 13+6/.3/ Pl Sto 18+76.37 p= l° 28' 35.8" fRT 1 0= l4° 05' 07.6" fRT 1 �= 59° 53' 28.3" fRT l D= 2° 5/' S3.2" D= 4° l4' 38.9" D= 37° l2' 18.2" L= 5/.54' L= 33/.88' L= 160.98' T= 25.77' T= 166.78' T= 88.72' R= 2,000.00' R= 1,350.00' R= 154.00' Vd = 50 MPH Vd = 50 MPH Vd = 25 MPH —L — PC Sto. l7 +87.66 ARCADIA LLC. DB 600 PG 649 �� Square Preformed Scour Hole (PSH) (Rip Rap in basin not shown for clarity) SECTION A-A PIPE (d = 30") c / �D �� PSRM � INFLOW LINER: CLASS B RIPRAP WITH FILTER FABRIC � MIN. 1' TUCK STA. 19 + 33 '� � � `; �"+ 50.00 ,�Ex. �w) �o rc �r� so, ��yA� n '� WITH NATURAL GROUND �8 PROJECT REFERENCE NO. B -5/73 R�W SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER SHEET NO. 4 HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ]��]EIL��I[�NA]Eg� ]�ILAIN� V➢� N�°ll° �J�]E �F�][3 C�N�°lC']tB�JC°Il°d�N -BYI- 8 POT —L — PT Sto. l9 +48.63 ARCADIA LLC. DB 600 PG 649 TIP PROJECT B-5173 —L— STA. 2 0+ 2 5. 00 �Jr� � END CONST. -L 2/f64.29 �� -L - POT Sta. 2/+67.99 �� -B�- e POT � � � � � �, � � � � � � � �� \✓ S � i�� ♦�♦�♦�♦� • � • • � ►�_�_�_�� • • . .. � ■■■�i ■��■�� ;� .,��9ii�i �.� ��i ��r�:�;� E�::��i�ii .....� .....��,,.. N� � O� � �' O N � Q �� c�l' OC