20240249 Ver 1_LRR_PCNSigned_20240208

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, WILMINGTON DISTRICT
CHARLOTTE REGULATORY OFFICE
8430 UNIVERSITY EXECUTIVE PARK DRIVE, SUITE 615
CHARLOTTE NORTH CAROLINA 28262
September 13, 2023
Regulatory Program/Division
Matt Kearns
Mungo Homes
441 Western Lane
Irmo, SC 29063
Via Email: [e-mail]
Dear Mr. Kearns:
This letter is in response to your request to the Wilmington District, Charlotte
Regulatory Office for a preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD). The project/review
area is located on the NE side of Little Rock Road, N of the intersection of Little Rock
Road and Tuckaseegee Road, at Latitude 35.248737 and Longitude -80.936294; in
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The review area for this determination
is limited to an approximately 16.78 acre(s) area comprised of 1 parcels (parcel
numbers: 05917201 (partial)), which is illustrated on the enclosed site maps. This
project has been assigned the file number SAW-2023-01576 (None). This file number
should be referenced in all correspondence concerning this project.

Based on our review of the information you furnished, a site inspection conducted on
September 13, 2023, and other information available to our office, we have preliminarily
determined the above-referenced area may contain approximately 1,045 linear feet of
non-wetland waters and 0.12-acre of waters of the United States under the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps) regulatory jurisdiction. These waters are identified in the
enclosed site maps, ÐApproximate Delineation of Surface Waters and WetlandsÑ dated
July 24, 2023. This determination was made in accordance with the Corps regulatory
authority pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and based upon criteria
contained in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the Eastern
Mountains and Piedmont regional supplement.

Section 404 of the Clean Water Act requires a Department of the Army (DA) permit
be obtained prior to the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United
States, including wetlands. Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 requires a
DA permit be obtained for any work in, on, over or under navigable waters of the United
States.

For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and
other resource protection measures, a permit decision made based on a preliminary

jurisdictional determination will treat all waters including wetlands that would be affected
in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the
U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you
may request an approved jurisdictional determination, which is an appealable action, by
contacting the Corps district for further instructions. Please sign and return the
attached PJD form within 30 days of receipt. If a signed PJD form is not received within
30 days of the date of this letter, the Corps will presume concurrence.
This determination has been conducted to identify the limits of CorpsÓ Clean Water
Act jurisdiction for the review area identified in this request. The determination may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you
or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA
programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of
the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
You are cautioned that work performed in areas which may be waters of the United
States, as indicated in the preliminary JD, without a Department of the Army permit
could subject you to enforcement action.
If you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please contact Doug
Perez, Biologist-Regulatory Specialist of the Charlotte Regulatory Office at (704) 510-
1439, by mail at the above address, or by email at [e-mail].
Please take a moment to complete our customer satisfaction survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0.
Sincerely,
Doug Perez
Biologist-Regulatory Specialist
Enclosures
cc: Drew Lucas, Wetlands & Waters, Inc. (via [e-mail])

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 9/13/2023
B.NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Matt Kearns, 441 Western Lane, Irmo, SC 29063
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington, None, SAW-2023-01576
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION The project/review area is located on the NE side
of Little Rock Road, N of the intersection of Little Rock Road and Tuckaseegee Road.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR AQUATIC
RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County: Mecklenburg City: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.248737 Longitude: -80.936294
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Paw Creek
E.REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):

Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 9/13/2023
Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION
SiteNumberLatitudeLongitudeEstimatedTypeofaquaticGeographicauthorityto
(decimal(decimaldegrees)amountofresources(i.e.,whichtheaquatic
degrees)aquaticwetlandvs.nonresourceͻƒğǤĬĻͼ
resourcesinwetlandwaters)subject(i.e.,Section404
reviewareaorSection10/404)
(acreageand
linearfeet,if
applicable
Nonwetland
Tributary135.248780.9362920FEETWatersSection404
NonwetlandSection404
Tributary1A35.2477980.936640FEETWaters
NonwetlandSection404
Tributary235.2493780.935385FEETWaters
Wetland100035.2482680.9364.01ACRESWetlandSection404
Wetland110035.2486680.9365.08ACRESWetlandSection404
Wetland120035.2492280.9356.02ACRESWetlandSection404
Wetland130035.2496180.9353.01ACRESWetlandSection404

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, and
to request and obtain an approved JD
the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
(AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs
and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2.In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or aNationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non-reporting NWP orother general permit, and the permit applicant has not
requested an AJD for theactivity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination
has
of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the
terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the
NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and
thereby agree to comply with all the terms andconditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the
subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of
the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking
any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permitauthorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement
that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the
applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further,
an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of
jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that
result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there
"may be" navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the followinginformation:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) C hecked items are included in the administrative record
and are appropriately cited:
Maps, plans, plots, or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:ÐApproximate Delineation of Surface Waters and WetlandsÑ dated 7/24/2023, Resource Map, Delineation Map

Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. Datasheets: DATASHEETS LABEL dated
DATASHEETS DATE
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study: CORPS STUDY LABEL dated CORPS STUDY DATE
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
USGS NHD data: USGS NHD LABEL dated USGS NHD DATE
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps: USGS WBD LABEL dated USGS WBD DATE
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: USGS Topo Quad Figure 3 dated 5/25/2023
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Soil Survey Figure 4 dated 5/25/2023
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: NWI Web Survey Figure 5 dated 5/25/2023
State/local wetland inventory map(s): dated LOCAL NWI DATE
FEMA/FIRM maps: FEMA Floodplain Panel Figure 6 dated 5/25/2023
100-year Floodplain Elevation is:ELEVATION (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
FLOOD ELEVATION LABEL dated FLOOD ELEVATION DATE
Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): County GIS, Figure 2 dated 5/25/2023
or Other (Name & Date): Field Photos dated 5/25/2023
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: PREVIOUS DETERMINATION LABEL dated
PREVIOUS DETERMINATION DATE
Other information (please specify):
OTHER INFORMATION LABEL dated OTHER INFORMATION DATE
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and
should not be relied upon for laterjurisdictional determinations.

Signature and date ofRegulatory Signature and date ofperson requesting
staff membercompleting PJD PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
1
Doug Perez the signature is impracticable)
9/13/2023
1
Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respondwithin the established time frame, the
district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up isnecessary prior to finalizing an action.

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Matt Kearns, Mungo Homes File Number: SAW-2023-01576 Date: 9/13/2023
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A

PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B

PERMIT DENIAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE C

PERMIT DENIAL WITH PREJUDICE D

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION F

SECTION I
The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at https://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Regulatory-
Program-and-Permits/appeals/ or Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.

A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit

ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the
district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the
LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP
means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its
terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.

OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may request that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and
return the form to the district engineer. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to
address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should
be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a
proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.

B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit

ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the
district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the
LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP
means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its
terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.

APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and
conditions therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This
form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

-6-

C. PERMIT DENIAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: Not appealable
You received a permit denial without prejudice because a required Federal, state, and/or local authorization
and/or certification has been denied for activities which also require a Department of the Army permit before
final action has been taken on the Army permit application. The permit denial without prejudice is not
appealable. There is no prejudice to the right of the applicant to reinstate processing of the Army permit
application if subsequent approval is received from the appropriate Federal, state, and/or local agency on a
previously denied authorization and/or certification.

D: PERMIT DENIAL WITH PREJUDICE: You may appeal the permit denial
You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received
by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information for reconsideration

ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps
within 60 days of the date of this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety and waive
all rights to appeal the approved JD.

APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of
Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to
the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.

RECONSIDERATION: You may request that the district engineer reconsider the approved JD by
submitting new information or data to the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. The
district will determine whether the information submitted qualifies as new information or data that justifies
reconsideration of the approved JD. A reconsideration request does not initiate the appeal process. You
may submit a request for appeal to the division engineer to preserve your appeal rights while the district
is determining whether the submitted information qualifies for a reconsideration.

F: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: Not appealable
You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not
appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the
Corps district for further instruction. Also, you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.

POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision you If you have questions regarding the appeal process, or
may contact: to submit your request for appeal, you may contact:

District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division Philip Shannin
Attn: Doug Perez Regulatory Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Wilmington District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615 South Atlantic Division
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262 60 Forsyth Street, Room M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801

Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
-7-

SECTION II Î REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT

REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. Use additional pages as necessary. You
may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in
the administrative record.)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the
Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information
to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record.

RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal
process. You will be provided a 15-day notice of any site investigation and will have the opportunity to
participate in all site investigations.

-8-

Date:

_______________________________
Signature of appellant or agent.
Email address of appellant and/or agent: Telephone number:
-9-

Matt Kearns 11-06-2023
Mungo Homes
441 Western Lane
Irmo, SC 29063

RE: Threatened and Endangered Species Evaluation
Little Rock Road
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
PIN: Partial 05917201

Mr. Kearns,

Wetlands & Waters, Inc. (W&W) has completed a late growing season pedestrian botanical survey for the
. W&W focused on federal
threatened and endangered species and potentially suitable habitat for those species listed on USFWS
and for which are applicable to the optimal survey window at the time of this
report. This report may be used by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (or other Lead Federal Agency such
as FEMA) to determine if additional coordination will be necessary to satisfy requirements of the
Endangered Species Act.

For the purpose of this report, the review area is located south of the terminus of Arapaho Drive in
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC.
Methodology
Evaluation of the review area included a report of known species and critical habitat occurrences within
or in close proximity to the project area from the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP)
database (Attachment B); field reviews of known extant populations of species that may potentially be
present; and on-site field evaluations of potentially suitable habitat for federally listed species known to
occur within the review area, conducted on September 7, 2023. The site evaluation focused on
Helianthus schweinitzii), Rhus michauxii), Tricolored Bat
(Perimyotis subflavus), and Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata) within potentially suitable habitat
areas in the review area. Photographs documenting reference populations (if applicable) and existing site
conditions are included in Attachment A.

Prior to conducting field evaluations, W&W staff review an automatically generated list of species and
known or expected to be on or near the project area and their habitat that may be present. When practical,
known populations of federal threatened and endangered species are referenced in a non-intrusive manner
for confirmation of seasonal growth patterns, diagnostic features, and behavioral characteristics.

Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
WETLAND AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
1

Species Profile
Helianthus schweinitzii) __Endangered
Habitat for
The species is found along roadsides, powerline clearings, old pastures, and woodland openings.
ire) to create open areas for full
sunlight, but may also grow in open stands of trees with minimal shade. Soils may be either shallow,
sandy with high gravel content, or a clayey hardpan. The sunflower may prefer soils derived from basic
material (Krings, Goyette, Suiter, & Samuels, 2021).

The NC NHP report indicates that there are no known occurrences of this species within a one-mile radius
of the review area.

Rhus michauxii)____________________________________________Endangered
exchange capacities and appears to depend on some form of disturbance to maintain the open quality of
its habitat. This disturbance may be in the form of fire, wind throws, or openings created by roads,
railroads and utility rights of way (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Southeast Region, Raleigh Ecological
Services Field Office, 2021).

Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus) Proposed Endangered
Tricolored bats are three to three and a half inches long. Their tricolored name derives from their
fur being dark at the base, light in the middle, and then dark at the tips. They forage in the early
evening typically preferring field edges and over waterways. During the winter they hibernate in
caves and mines. In areas with few caves, they can be found in culverts, barns, tree cavities, and
abandoned water wells. Their breeding season begins in the fall. There is potentially suitable
habitat for this species within the review area. The Tricolored bat is listed as proposed
endangered and has limited protections under the regulations until it is up-listed to endangered.

Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata) ______ Threatened
Smooth Coneflower is typically found in open woods, cedar barrens, roadsides, clear cuts, dry limestone
bluffs and power line rights-of-way. The species is usually found on magnesium and calcium rich soils
associated with amphibolite, dolomite or limestone (in VA), gabbro (in NC and VA), diabase (in NC and
SC) and marble (in SC) (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Southeast Region, Raleigh Ecological Services
Field Office, 2011). The best Echinacea laevigata populations receive abundant sunlight and little
competition from other plant species (Gaddy 1991, as referenced in U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Southeast Region, Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office, 2011).

Findings
The review area is an approximately 16.8-acre parcel. The majority of the review area is mixed hardwood
forest with a sanitary sewer right-of-way running through the center of the review area. Historic aerials
indicate the review area was timbered in 2008. The site is underlain by Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes, 8 to 15 percent slopes, Iredell fine sandy loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes, and Wilkes loam, 8
to 15 percent slopes. Potentially suitable habitat is present for the ,
Sumac, and Smooth Coneflower, but it is limited to the sanitary sewer right-of-way and road frontage
along Little Rock Road.

Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
WETLAND AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
2

Potentially suitable habitat is present for , Smooth Coneflower,
Sumac; however, no individuals were found during the site evaluation. The results of the field survey are
illustrated on the attached figure, Threatened and Endangered Species Survey.

Potentially suitable habitat is present for the Tricolored Bat; the Corps has issued guidance that following
the species uplisting to Endangered status, projects will be required to either abide by a tree clearing
moratorium from April 1 to October 15, or conduct acoustic surveys in accordance with USFWS survey
protocols to determine presence or absence.

Recommendations
W&W conducted evaluations of plant communities and potentially suitable habitat for the federally listed
Helianthus schweinitzii), Rhus michauxii), Tricolored Bat
(Perimyotis subflavus), and Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata) within the Little Rock Road
review area. Although potentially suitable habitat is present for , Michauxs
Sumac, and Smooth Coneflower, no individuals were observed within the review area. Because of this

This concludes our assessment of the presence or absence of the federally endangered
Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), Rhus michauxii), proposed
endangered Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus), and federally threatened Smooth Coneflower
(Echinacea laevigata) and the presence of suitable habitat for those species. Should you require more
information regarding the results of our evaluation, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely,

Perry Isner
[phone]

Enclosures: Federally Threatened and Endangered Species Survey
Attachment A. Field Photographs
Attachment B. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Report
Attachment C. USFWS IPaC Species List
Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
WETLAND AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
3

References
Krings, A., Goyette, S., Suiter, D., & Samuels, M. (2021, July). Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus
schweinitzii). Retrieved from Rare plants of North Carolina:
https://projects.ncsu.edu/cals/plantbiology/ncsc/rare/images/Helianthus_schweinitzii_NHP.pdf
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Southeast Region, Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office. (2011). Smooth
Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. Raleigh, NC: U.S.
Fish & Wildlife Service.

Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
WETLAND AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
4

Legend
Review Area
Approximate Photo
Locations
02505001,000Feet
Esri Community Maps Contributors, County of Gaston, mecknc, State of North Carolina DOT, © OpenStreetMap, Microsoft, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS,
EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, Maxar, Microsoft
Project Name:
Little Rock Road
Mungo Homes
Owner / Developer:
City / County:
Charlotte/Mecklenburg
Federally Threatened and Endangered Tax PIN(s):partial 05917201Acreage:16.78
Species Survey Lat:Long:
Coordinates:35.2486377°N-80.9362069°WDate:11-04-2023

Buubdinfou!B;
Gjfme!Qipuphsbqit

Buubdinfou!C;
Opsui!Dbspmjob!Obuvsbm!Ifsjubhf
Sfqpsu

Buubdinfou!D;
VTGXT!JQbD!Tqfdjft!Mjtu