20240250 Ver 1_Jack Smith Creek_PJD_Package_full_210211_20240129

City of New Bern Drainage Repairs
Jack Smith Creek Drainage Basin
Nationwide Permit Application
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Package

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue, Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 919-696-3045
February 11, 2021
Emily Thompson
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, NC 27889
RE: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination package, New Bern, Jack Smith Creek drainage
basin
Dear Emily,
On behalf of the City of New Bern, Axiom is happy to provide the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) with the attached Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) package
for the Jack Smith Creek basin in New Bern, NC. Jurisdictional area delineations were
conducted from early June through mid -July 2020. Natural Resources Conservation Service
(NRCS) WETS tables data indicates that precipitation was within or above normal for this time.
The Jack Smith Creek basin encompasses a highly developed portion of New Bern. Residential
development dominates the basin, with a corridor of commercial development generally centered
along Neuse Boulevard. A stormwater treatment wetland constructed and managed by the City
of New Bern occupies the northern portion of the basin near the outfall of Jack Smith Creek.
Elevations within the basin range from a high of approximately 26 feet (North American Vertical
Datum of 1988 [NAVD 88]) along the western boundary of the basin to a low of approximately
0 feet NAVD 88 at the outfall of Jack Smith Creek.
Please find attached to this letter the following items:
• USACE Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions,
• USACE FINALSAW-JD-REQUEST-FORM-20170508
• USACE PJD-fillable-form 2016-11
• USACE PJD Aquatic Resources Table (attachment to the USACE PJD fillable form
2016-11)
• Potential jurisdictional area figures
• Potential jurisdictional area data forms
• Potential jurisdictional area photographs
• Jack Smith Creek soils summary
• Jack Smith Creek WETS table data
• City of New Bern/Axiom Environmental Agent Authorization form
All information regarding the current definitions of the Waters of the United States (WOTUS)
are provided in the Federal Register, 33 CFR 328.3 and 40 CFR 120.2, The Navigable Waters

Protection Rule: Definition of "Waters of the United States. A Rule by the Engineers Corps and
the Environmental Protection Agency on 0412112020, " and available at:
hgps://www.federalre_ig ster.gov/documents/2020/04/21/2020-02500/the-navigable-waters-protec
tion-rule-definition-of-waters-of-the-united-states.
No Traditional Navigable Waters (TNWs) are located within the project area of the Jack Smith
Creek basin. The discussion within the Federal Register regarding TNWs (and Territorial Seas)
is available at: htt2s://www.federalregister.gov/d/2020-02500/p-290.
Tributaries to TNWs are defined as linear features that exhibit either intermittent or perennial
flow. The flow regime of tributaries to TNWs are documented with the North Carolina Stream
Identification Forms version 4.11 (and the associated documentation, Methodology for
Identification oflntermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins), and stream quality is
documented using USACE Stream Quality Assessment Forms. The flow regime of each
tributary is identified on mapping as intermittent (i) or perennial (p).
Adjacent wetlands (Discussion in Federal Register at https://www.federalre_ig ster.gov/d/ 2020-
02500/p-460). Jurisdictional wetlands are identified by characteristic hydrology, soils, and
hydrophytic vegetation and are flagged in the field with sequentially numbered flagging to
facilitate review (except in maintained areas where flags are subject to damage or removal). All
areas exhibiting jurisdictional wetland criteria have been included; wetlands have not been
separated into adjacent and isolated categories.
Most project features are ditches that were created to drain the local urban and residential
infrastructure. The flow regimes of project ditches were rated using the Methodology for
Identification oflntermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins. Ditches that demonstrate
geomorphic, hydrologic, and biologic indicators representative of tributaries are identified on
mapping as intermittent (i) or perennial (p). Ditches with less than intermittent flow may support
the hydrology, soils, and hydrophytic vegetation characteristic of jurisdictional wetlands.
Ditches that do not support jurisdictional wetlands or a flow regime characteristic of tributaries
are depicted as potential non -wetland waters when an Ordinary High Water Mark is present.
Soils data extracted from the NRCS digital data for Craven County indicates that soils within
Jack Smith Creek include soil series characteristic of riparian and non -riparian landscapes.
Several stream features are depicted in the lower portion of the basin (Figure 4).
The hydrography depicted on Figure 5 of the PJD package indicates several streams generated by
the NC Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) Headwater Stream Spatial Dataset
(HSSD) program and incorporated into the latest version of the Advancing Transportation
through Linkages, Automation, and Screening (ATLAS) hydrography dataset. HSSD streams
are generated using a range of environmental data, primarily Digital Elevation Model derivatives
(i.e. elevation, slope, curvature), and field -located data points to perform a regression analysis of
likely stream origin points. It should also be noted that current HSSD/ATLAS hydrography is
generated from Legacy Light Distance and Ranging (LiDAR) data (collected during or near 2005
with a grid size of 20 feet). This is significant as small and/or flat landscape features are
occasionally misrepresented at this scale. The stormwater infrastructure in urban areas (and

dominating the Jack Smith Creek basin) can also cause misrepresentations in the hydrography
model.
Figure 7 depicts additional regulatory jurisdictions: in this case, areas subject to the Neuse River
Riparian Buffer Rules regulated by the NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) and areas
subject to Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA) rules under the jurisdiction of the NC
Division of Coastal Resources (NCDCM). Features subject to Neuse River Riparian Buffer
Rules consist of intermittent or perennial streams (tributaries) that are depicted on the US
Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle and/or on NRCS Soil Survey
mapping. Areas subject to NCDCM jurisdiction were verified on -site by Mr. Brad Connell of
the NCDCM during a field visit on August 11, 2020.
Figures 8 and 8A through 8S of the attached PJD package depicts the activities and locations of
FEMA-defined Category A and Category D work where they occur in or adjacent to
jurisdictional features. Category A work consists of the removal of accumulated sediment and
debris within ditches and stream channels. The removal of vegetative and miscellaneous debris
(including trash, white goods, construction debris, and other non -natural introduced items) is
anticipated to occur as a non -regulated activity that does not require permitting. Accumulated
sediment removal is anticipated to be Exempt from Section 404 permitting as maintenance to
existing drainage ditches. Sediment will be removed to the extent of the original ditch geometry.
Ditches will not be deepened or widened. Category D work consists of maintenance and repairs
to structures and slopes. Damaged structures and slopes that require the addition of rip rap or
similar hardened structure are anticipated to be permitted under USACE Nationwide Permitting
(NWP3, Maintenance and/or NWP13 Bank Stabilization) and NCDCM General Permitting
where appropriate. Currently, the locations of Category D activities have been identified;
however, potential impacts have not been quantified. It is anticipated that some areas identified
as potential Bank Stabilization activities may not intersect the associated OHWM and therefore
will not be subject to Section 404 permitting. In these cases, these activities will be removed
from the catalog of permitted activities and a request will be submitted to add them to the
inventory of non -regulated activities.
The City of New Bern would like to request approval for activities that may be performed with
No Permit Required (both Exempt and Non -regulated activities) and anticipates referencing this
PJD package for upcoming permitting projects.

Please let us know if you have any questions about the information within this package. We are
happy to discuss any items by phone, email, or in the field, and can provide additional
photographs, data forms, or figures that you may need. We look forward to working with you
further on this project.
Sincerely,
Scott Davis
Senior Scientist/Project Manager

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID ##: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a].
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑Institutional ❑Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
The City of New Bern has proposed to remove sediment and debris from ditches/stream channels as well repair culverts and stabilize
ditch/stream banks that were damaged by Hurricane Florence.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: City of New Bern, Matt Montanye, Director of PubliC�
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Axiom Environmental, c/o Scott Davis
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b] :
7. Project Location —Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B 1 b]:
New Bern - Jack Smith Creek (35.116008,-77.065523)
8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B 1 a] : N/A
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Craven
10. Project Location Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: New Bert}
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Neuse River Estuary
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]: 03020204
Authorization: Section l0 On Section 404 W1
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑ Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
No Permit Required.
Revised 20150602

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers
VAI�n ng[on DOdcl
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www. saw. usace. arny. ini 1/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator. aspx,
by calling 91 a-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Retain 208
Asheville, North Carolina 2880I -5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Ileritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Nuinber: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Cieneral Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-2514633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requesters must complete Parts A, B, C, 0, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: City of New Bern
City, State:
County:
New Bern, NC
Craven
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Axiom Environmental. c/o Scott Davis
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Select one:
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
919-696-3045
sdavis a@axiomenvironmental .org
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: City of New Bern- Matt Montanye, Dire,
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1129
New Bern, NC 28563
Telephone Number: 252-639-7501
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/ParceVTax Record).
Version. May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION1,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899_ I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Matt Montanye, Director of Public Works, City of New Bern
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner I r l Authorized Agent'
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority_
Q I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide_
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel_
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version. May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional. Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
7 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJ D) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United. States" or "navigable waters of the United. States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Detennination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and. Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website, A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an. AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
❑ Size of Property or Review Area —110.8 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
❑�
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.116008
Longitude:-77•065523
F7A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I Ix17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate_
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate_
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
• (at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary snapping standards. litip://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
P ro Ana nW uri sdi ction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional. Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs. ❑lease complete an. Annro�ed Jurisdictional Deternninatian Forms
Vicinity Map
zAerial Photograph
z USGS Topographic Map
❑� Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
rJ Landscape Photos (if taken)
❑ NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
0 NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
x,�T �w.saw.usace.ariny.iuil/Potrtals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocsiJDiRGL_08-02 Atop A PrelimJD_Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see tlttp://w rw.saw.usace.anny.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Perinii-Prop-ram/Jurisdictioii/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federa [jurisdiction under the retulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGEwebsite.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, ifinfarmation is not provided, the
request foran AJD cannot beevaluated norcan an AJD be issued.
Version. May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Scott Davis. Axiom Environmental; 218 snow Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27603
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Craven City: New Bern
Center coordinates of site (latllong in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.116008 Long.:-77.065523
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Neuse River Estuary
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 101404)
Please
see
attached
table

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJ❑ or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.F. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Vicinity: Aerial photography: LiQAR; Soils: Hydrography: Potential jurisdictional areas: additional areas assessed.
Map.
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Askin (11983), New Bern (1988) 24k quads.
Fol Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil surrey {current), SS of Craven County (1939)
■❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
NC statewide wetlands, NWI online (current, accessedMay 8, 2020),
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
■❑ Photographs: ■❑ Aerial (Name & Date): 2016 NC OneMap Imagery
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
digitally signed by Scott Davis
Cott Davis Oate:2021.02.11 F3:27A0-05'00'
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

City of New Bern, Jack Smith Creek drainage basin
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) Form
Table of Aquatic Resources in the review area that "may be" subject to regulatory jurisdiction.
Site number
Latitude
(decimal degrees)
Longitude
(decimal degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resource in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
Jack Smith Creek-p
35.120357
-77.073044
1642 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Jack Smith Creek-i
35.118348
-77.073044
1397 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-1p
35.124116
-77.074691
4174 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-1i
35.121451
-77.072313
1070 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-1
35.120484
-77.070867
57 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-2p
35.121227
-77.063319
955 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-3p
35.118122
-77.067301
2233 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-4p
35.121923
-77.064009
68 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-5p
35.120126
-77.058080
1175 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-5i
35.119920
-77.055893
240 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-6p
35.111270
-77.061406
7363 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-6i
35.109303
-77.074385
796 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-7p
35.122016
-77.080980
658 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-7i
35.120779
-77.080920
384 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-8i
35.106908
-77.070358
534 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-9i
35.120937
-77.080450
155 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-9
35.119956
-77.078724
557 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-10i
35.119457
-77.069331
649 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-10
35.118087
-77.070482
53 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-11i
35.119146
-77.068838
121 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-11
35.118778
-77.068313
292 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-12i
35.112718
-77.056309
913 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-13i
35.115695
-77.068620
312 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-14i
35.121195
-77.063433
29 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-15i
35.115416
-77.075762
452 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-15
35.113092
-77.077125
632 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-16i
35.115538
-77.075422
138 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-17i
35.116362
-77.077906
506 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-18i
35.106798
-77.076126
277 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-19i
35.107952
-77.066396
890 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-19
35.106309
-77.066849
161 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-20i
35.114101
-77.060471
919 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-21i
35.124373
-77.075698
2053 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-22
35.124708
-77.077993
174 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-23
35.124072
-77.076310
214 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-24
35.122650
-77.074484
103 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-25
35.122278
-77.074428
105 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-26
35.121179
-77.074541
801 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-27
35.120093
-77.076063
285 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-28
35.119819
-77.075603
55 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-29
35.121144
-77.075859
685 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-30
35.121024
-77.071838
25 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-31
35.119892
-77.068985
28 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-32
35.118770
-77.068915
232 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-33
35.118274
-77.067575
140 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404

Site number
Latitude
(decimal degrees)
Longitude
(decimal degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resource in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
JSC-NWW-34
35.118848
-77.067161
38 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-35
35.118678
-77.067101
24 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-36
35.118627
-77.066983
26 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-37
35.119362
-77.065039
219 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-38
35.117498
-77.059436
466 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-39
35.117318
-77.063365
99 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-40
35.117327
-77.063179
266 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-41
35.114037
-77.063059
237 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-42
35.113987
-77.064283
28 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-43
35.118401
-77.051130
134 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-44
35.113952
-77.057736
22 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-45
35.111214
-77.060727
224 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-46
35.110855
-77.056720
906 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-47
35.112343
-77.050109
29 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-48
35.108883
-77.069577
37 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-49
35.108909
-77.070611
29 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-50
35.106982
-77.075675
30 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-51
35.106599
-77.078126
112 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-52
35.107262
-77.079896
346 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-53
35.119454
-77.077119
102 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-54
35.119883
-77.078686
29 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-55
35.119950
-77.078627
31 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-56
35.120478
-77.079675
29 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-57
35.120544
-77.079614
31 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-58
35.114453
-77.081712
96 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-59
35.115032
-77.078421
27 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-60
35.116657
-77.076482
182 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-61
35.116049
-77.076614
130 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-62
35.116032
-77.076449
58 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-63
35.115444
-77.075220
60 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-64
35.112653
-77.076289
1220 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-65
35.115452
-77.068450
184 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-66
35.116941
-77.077560
12 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
JSC-NWW-671
35.116203
-77.066144
23 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404
Total:
40,188 linear feet
Non -wetland
Section 404

_t p rn
Y
� O �r� l 0 - d
~F--" WN� W Z f7 Z
E w 3 i 2 Z
'S LL 16
w o ODd' coN m ern o� lL
E . } Y 2 C)m -a z
U
U Q a v �Z.0 oc � 3
L a` z m¢z 189 z3`mO 0 0 0 m
1 •
IS
! m I
c .
i
a
w a
m
t t t m S
N N
Y
0 z
U
! t Al ,_ ��� W � r• 1� !I
77
} .+!{,fir `• �� "••Y rt�
• � tip. �w; .r�D _ � � k
•
• �►"v it
40
G
•� • .,` � � \:.� III I' .�'m
,

c
z
E
a
a
�
o
a` a`
U
w
N
L�
a Z
0 o fn a`
m:
m
Y y f
y N � , r
m
N '
m � f
f U O
Sao�;

0
-
W
ow `v
mm wE¢
C
N
E2 --,q
E
y a
Y
d
c U v
Z
a
o
Q
o-
-
C7
o ow
a`
R�,t
..
2'
~' 4

m
E r v r , U
_opa �Z
E
y a
c•
U
Y d
c v
a
ow
a`
a`
z m n n ¢`
77
A.4
�
'Awe
1 f
A
4
13,
N
4
W
w
N
L�
®'

Q
z
v c L
�
�
-
r•-r W
ow `v
-
�
mo,
LL
N
Erw--,q
o` n o Z
L�
E
y a Y d
c v
z
C Q
-
3
-
a` a`
z° m oN a r''o C7a`
zap
LL
8
I

- 2
W
o00
`v
W
w
Z d
F N
U
E m E 4
LL
m
r v r U
o
o
�o�
N
O
_pZ
E
y a
Y
d
c v
vz� _
a
°
o m
a`
a`
Z m a C7 ¢`
Jti�e
40
SJ
E
y'
F
m
�6.
o °
PdG
�
z
o Op
Z
�ao F' J
k
U a Z
n... ._ .m ..s.�
'+'
r
n z
,

3
3m
Uz
Q
Ear°
E
mE.
r r U
E
y a
Y
d
c z v
vz� _
o in
a
°
o m
a`
T
a`
z°
a
e
P,
6
E
m
3 o
I
z F
`o C,
O
J
�ao
O
z
e
W
N
z �
0 o fn a`
Soot
rr,.ti
i4
u
a
i

-
2
W
o00
`v
/
W
w
Z d
F N
U
E m E 4
o LL
o
�o�
N
O
r v r � U
_pa �Z
E
y a
Y
d
c v
z 8 _
a °
^ owm
a` a`
z° m a C¢`
r '

0
� W o00
m d L U P v ci o LLJ
2r2Er�c�i (� N
E y a Y d c z v Z
a C Q 7 —
No 3 —
a,
m o
cl
Py- m
a` z
y
J 00
1 o
3f
r �
� d
A
c� e
is
,o
N gyr �`�.r4 j / � �° 1y C �"5 �„�' �`-"3 sP: � 'fig^ 4�'•�
jl
r,
3
4 � /jf at
ke
.i
� fC ar
i
/r a �6�� , ��"� � � �• fro ".
.5

0
-
W
ow `v
mm
N
E2w--,qi
(�
a
o
Q
o-
-
C7
o ow
a`
- �1$1 1- 7,t"
Y. Gib' 1Y. yyy � �Ct �� ✓,w /x. /y �" ., � phi � y��,� je \ � rryx
x
Nil
NS. �
f 4�
a ,
U

0
-
W ow `v
mrn wE¢
Z
N
E2 --,q
a o
Q o—
—
C7
o
ow
a`

0
-
W
ow `v
mrn wE¢
�
N
E2 --,q
E
y a
Y
d
c O v
z
O
Q
-
3 -
a`
a`
z m oN a �''o C7
a`
v�
9
i
�6,.
Meadows St
Meadows St
_
m
w�
c
U
Y..
Simmons St ,
m
oy
m
C
N
Q
'O
ry
N k i
0
O-
—
FO
�
d
1
w
StyE'
Ed9ecombe
Pie
i
W
Gta°e
�
� `fain
r
\
\
j
•,4 O W�
1
Pin
lo
O
I
k
�.. ,
F
u O o
E9 ret Clr:,
m `
T o 0
l
r G a` z
m
ou

0
-
/
W
ow `v
a � cUiOr
ma
�m
d
Erv��q
C7 N
r o
O
V1
O
—o`n oZ
L�
E
y a
Y
d
c v
z
Q
C
Q
—
z
3
—
ow
a` a`
T
9 ,
i
O
N
Q
m
Jefferson Ave
"'�
� a
d �' °
0
w o 0
o
T '0 U
vd
Stewart B-
o 00
o
J
Y
N
O
N
� k
a
of
_
3
'
ay
o
�t,a
a
G
✓P
IC
r
o
Eighth St
P E
C
m
d'
u'
�i 4
m
St
-
°
L.
9th
¢
o
Ninth St
o
u
-
m.
m
m
0
c
u
Q.
m
c
o
m
0
U
0 o

0
-
W
ow `v
d m
FN
o,m w E¢
N
c
oR; LL
Er'w--,q
(�
E
y a
Y
d
c v
Z
ow
T
O
a
�
C
E
O
¢]
Z F
O � Q
� c) a` z
u
uaanp
F'
m
�
J
o
auuy
..
C
a`
Fourth
St
U
Fourth St
m,
E
ul eAnneuey�
-
L
K
i
m-
u-'
c'
m
9
. m
a
N
d
Y
Fifth St
7S 477Ij
s
Sixth S
i1
a
�e
3
E
Colonial PI --
ra .
p

Y
U Z
z
❑
N
rn
o
�
W
—
W
_
d N r C F O
. -W
m y
i�f
U Q s
=COQ.
J Q
NOIC7mL ryW`
N�
wa—
owc) d w..
rno v U y
W
D
D Q
w
csw
�00 N �C
E�J�noz "w w#
M
K
c
1
U
o rcy
F
U
E�
E�
vo2
r v
a
'RIIIIIII milli
y
N e
M m
c �
O_
M N n N N
w m m M M M M �'11111111111 f y.
M

-
!|
)
\
a
)�
=
q\
/�}//ƒ�)�{
LU
D co
(
% m
,
;®!![!(|!«
°
q
}f};I
U-
E
2 /
a
^
) })/k\\))}\
) /
!
/
))
LU

Y
t
�
W
D LI.
CV)
tl
Zcsw
�OaO
N iC
EwZ��c
V.
w
c
R'
fA
J
c
ct_mv
EN�v
o
IL
�y`
T
Y
ui
E
a
Z
v_-
3
a
c
q E ry 10 v-
v
m
a`
z° m"❑�❑ao�E�3
0
o
y
a`
_
m
9
C
a
R
�
r N th rn
C N
�
W
�
O h V M N
N N N N N N
m
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
�
�
O
of oq
1111 1 1 W
N
R

o
a
c
a`
mN
N m
U
CO>EUw�`o
Q�
mrnC7cc� �ww
o- Z
'--E
o
zmo.°k
U
z
W
(� M
LL
o
a
m ry o 4
111111
ry rn a
m
m
c
11111111111111
a
m
m
� d
a^
W
Z
o N
M M M
7�1 ff
p
C U d
W m��m'111111111
J00

�
�i• �
W
rn¢ z ..
ul
d
rJ+
tss
_?
� •C
°m rn
112.1
LU
w
-
E
o
�p��vE
0
0-
Z m O,k❑ a02 EH 3
0
0
m
a
o
a
ry
N N N N N
d
C
N N N N N N
a`
N
m
Z m
w
�
.J
� O
p
'rs M n n M M
a
UL
v
1111111
J
r-

u =
c
Y W
c Z
rn2 i
p
o
LU
K
C J F O
mN
c z
U Qs
2N � 2
NrnC7 ma ry W�
r'o � "mow 'Zo
�'
LLJ
7
�_ M
LL Z w
N iC
tz
nE
w`
U) J
� �
E
o
LL
y E N v
o f
�
3
a a`
z° mowo ao�E�3
❑
❑
y
a

rc
N
ri , LL
m v
3 �
Z
>
w`
LL
c
•� a
On
o
_
Q
a a`
—
c
Z
❑
N
rn
O
�
UZ Q
2
°m 1dvvrn 9Zo
rna w::
LU
w-N ��
a; ,_ E U a j N
D W
(� Cl)
�OaOE���no?avc
J
LL
2.0 10 w
a
o
2
U
w_
Q E
o rt.L,0 L .

0 rn
L O w O
> vOi O, f7 N Ory c5
m�L U in o �rn� �fnvw�'n W
TN_--
Z m d Q O a >-Z z E...
`om� �m N m E1�� �o�
o W
o yy F U a m n
a` a` z mz0 C) 0 oSw nv°C75 0 o rn a`
. o
f E o
plFw -. t�4 T O .�
00
S Li
LU
LU
cr
5 v
s,
aG !
4 Laaf
E
o

L
w 0
0
rn
dWa
-
T
oc m Mm00NNom -2o�
Z
LL?NvompNrnmo
mo °
m im`
Lo ov ry o oLLJ
vmE
4 wE
rnnZ
o "�uwammm
Li
a0
°2mEo �>
oo o o
o�a�ESv
Zo
U-.mon
aN E
LL
O xa -?o mow
�zw
zE
opo< --
oan
Ua
�W �p
U 2
7a
ia
`
za zdk z£nz¢
T
�
_
�
-f
m
E
o
m x a
Q
E
U)
U fD
o
m � Q Q
T
Q
z
o w 0 ---
_ E O
C
C, w
x z z a
i"il 0
c) U U a z
am
Ami
�71,Gj

/
a
0
o
m e m
L.
F
vm
o-
(D
LL z
a
�ryr��
O O CC
(n
N
0-.V
�"O n z
Y v
..
L
a y} yT,
Y
vzv n_
�Eg
n z
a o V
Q
7
a` a`
z mNa . C7
o a`
3
N
pia
3
4
3 `'.
3
r�• z
3
- 10
E
m
3 _> v om
z - - - - _ € ,
° v `v `v `v `v 3 a v o
OF
�
1c
Z
r.
Oa
U
e � ... � .�.... ..� .. .tad..
<
ti
c
Q
107.
C .
ALI
a. �F
W

o rn
d
0
W
Lw
Z
0 o fn a`
�ti-

az
,
-
3
moi
3m
Uz
xN
°w
CQ
kwc°
vm via o-oo
W
LL
z a
�m
Y
d
�rvr�0
a v
Cfl
w
oGC
0
o p CC
n
.V
ao` Z r
a
y}
yT,
Y
vzv n_ �Eg
n
z
a
o
U
Q
7
a
- �n
-
a`
a`
z°�
a m a m
o o
`
a
z

o rn
d
0
W
L.L
z �
10
0 o fn a`
im
a oil
Uri
m q
VVI
.h
m �
o
and q�e
c

v
0
o
LL
m m
FN Y,O m
`
Z
ao a v
w
o�
o
o p CC
cn 0-.V Z Y
.. Lw
a
U
Q 7 - E a a
-
a`
a`
z° mNa r'n C7¢ a ma m
...
o o
m
3 G� JS
� SrG
IS
o
go
o � o
•-
m v L m
r •
c v 0 p u r J4
w v v o W
zo 10 m m m w olook
j\ 7,
(
* Y
SC
a
F�7
n
2S
z
i
!J

az
�
m c m
Fcn
Y,a
�z °
m t5
� _
LL
Z l0 m
0]
Er wt �U
ao a
o
v
w
o
d .V
Z
Y
..
Lw
vz v n
E u
n
z
-
E 6 a
-
a`
a`
z° m N a. C7 ¢`
a m a m
...
o o
w m
3
3 3
E - 3 _
m
w 3 - ° >
z - - - - - s F
- - - - O
W o
3
0 0 0 0 U
z
o

y N a
z a��
c
zt5 o 00
Z
` o o p CC cn Y v
wr o y F V VI `wz o
a U Q j _ �n� a
a` om
2—
z° mrva C7¢ m ma m
N
z�
l
o
rn
�
0
d
W
z
�
0
o
fn
a`
3
3
OC
3
Ic
3 00
3
E - 3Ic _OC
m u w a
3 o m
v
Z € = F
06, O
o
O
T 3
a z
j}EL
p< �// is f. � � �A: /✓ 4 •�
0

Y N w=
L.� �EZ
Z l0 N 0] Er wr �U
0 o p CC n d .V ao a Y v
E .Si } Y Y -O mO wr o y F V VI `wz...
a U V Q j _ �na
a` a` mrva C7 ¢` z a ma m
o
rn
�
d
0
W
LL
OW
0 o
n a`

/
a
0
o
wt5
o-oo
O
Z
Er vt �U
a
v=
0
o p CC
cn
0-.V
ao` z
r
LL
vzv n_
�E0
n
z
a
U
V
Q
7
-
a` a`
z° mNa C7¢
a ma m
o o
m. a`
m
6
Z
G
P
3
o
3o
s
n o
v �, � v
o
m � 3
� oo
o. w> 3 o U
0 m m m m v € F
0
o
0 °
r.

Y
w
p
o
o
rn
o
2 8-.. ...
i
z a
FN
a v
m T So o-oo
� v r.
W
6
�a- �
U
u Z r w
mew
LL
wz... _ E U
?
a
>.
n
z
a o
a a
Q
- aa�
z m a v�i C74 a ma m
o
Q
o
o
-
fq
a
e j
4
✓
r
Lf3
.�
/ate, O �
e is
ol
Z
�
e
e
�.l
m
� o
9
O
p o z
` - o
- 5
0
a �
o m
�
m 3
...
a
c
a o m
U `? m'
E
4F
mp m ~
p d d d d cl
T
\
v\
i
5
o i
�
y

°
C W
W
..5°
w `v
Fes: 3
3oi Uz
Z C a ~ N
YO V
'
2 ;r -7
Ea-
�
U
a m a m
a I
I
I
I
I
I

0
C
W
W
...o 0
v `v
. m
..
Z C a
FN
YO V
o, ovrSz o
Ea-
v
U
a
p
Q
a ma m
m
m
0
o
c0 p z
T - O
o
o
OC
_ C
o —
m o m -
o o
> 3 0 >
z -M -�-
o m o Q
U a z m m m z mo z a
�000EII
a
r
s
A'v
to�, -Z
r 3^ Ufti

Y
0
o
0
w v
2 8-.
rn
z C a ~N U o, z Ea o-`o o
o
I�
LL 2 ;r —
Ea- U �
w
o�
u Z r w
LL
wz... _
a
a
o Q - �n� a
-
a` a` z No ,'n C7¢ m ma m
o
o
a`

Y
0
o
o
2 8-..
...
¢'
z a
FN
a v
m TSo
� v r.
o-oo
Y
6
U
o' O a-
u Z
mew
r w
LL
? E U
>.
z
a
o
Q
o-
a a
-
a`
a`
z ma C7¢
N
a ma m
o
o
m a`
E
S O
a

t
�
z
�
rY,
IM�— LL
c
m
3 L71
z � a
�
a
o
a` a`
w
U
w
U
N
C O
v v
Po
U
vz°
=Z
F
.V
aU m
zEa
° o0
Q
m
° vS FD
8
Nm
Q N
E�"Oa—U
-
Yv_
wa
m
o �
o no
J
0
0
z
CO p
T _ O
0a
a�
�.o
/
mo m
d c o
m m
—
z '° '^ m m m m F
+i
-- > U
U a` z a a a z a z a
a ,e
,a•", ,�
p
a
Ao
Vol
IS
(g y
4
`II '
'a
e,
IS
7.

0
Y v U o o
2 8-. ai i
m�U�
Z o wr oFD
6 (�
-U me
u Z r w LL
mU wr ?' T ..
o y F V v Z_ E a Z
G U Q — Ufa n —
a`mNa C7¢ a ma m
d
o a
o
m a
z
C o '^
0
1 ° 5 �, ■ °
� v � o
a m r
O
0-
N
C In
C V \
C C �
o - > 3 0 >
v C n
v � —
z� ^ m m
T i > m C ¢ IS SRO
C C C C
O v
U o
d Z d d d Z d Z im
jao�AVE
�W-
AA
• s ri "
�.,47
' 7r � ' i -_. .. �. ■tea ,
All
l "tea
"� r,,.. _`� i d� ' s6v�� �/�. • ` !{gyp .-
7 F
� � o
w.
y
�w
a
a:

0
Y o 0
2 8-.. i
ZC.a FN�.V m nz Eo o-oo Z
EnOa -U �
u Z r w Lw
a V wz... _ a
�nOF� a -
a` N a C7 ¢ a m
-61
e rl
rr
a At•
'F' r ryl
�
Y
v
41
A
C
0
v,
5 1 l i
"`g;. 4a+.F b vim♦ "�'` ° +a.' Ee4 F e�
, -,z't m t
Ar
�. F,S.. c ✓K Y,� / y x, ,� -
s�alda�
i
la
o _ -
m S °O14
o
o
in
� a m
o lo
m � o
go
>
° m> - p O-�
cl
O
a° a° a° z a° z a
000 110

ZL
W E
j z a
r? N
O p� CC
0
a � U
a` a`
E
v-
0 o
m
d
w
E
oo°
o�
U
v
—a-E
W
aU
tb
`
za.E
_.
-
6v`U.
NZ
mvaz—E.Ei
r
r
E
w
Z>v
0�v_vwE
Ur
N=FY¢
LL
t�
vvZaW
Zo
in
j vmw.oa
>�—E
> a
�3
3 —
C7`¢�,
¢
`B
¢za
■ o`
®1

v= o °
Z w E w N yr _ d
c m ct � aoEXN�ov - Q
m L Uz `° T�n�o vz����" mo r.�sv" w
r� zma �m V� �rvro� avv - aZ> a€"> (3 00
►✓` O O�CC N C �o uwv a > aow wo
E } Y Y Q £ vzv _ 10 `m>rn '�°10 v 3a_ z
< U V Q d - 3 a _ m E v o Ti U E 3 - n d `! u`r°£ o m v v _ rnv w= m E- ` 3_ w v v
a` a` z° m�a C7 ¢` ¢`� m >F `mw <zv'v oa° c!� o o rn a`
N
a a
r
z
zow
z �,
M
N
C 2 C
v O W v OO
E v, C E
m o o
3 E . E r - -
— _ — N
3 0� z o z
3 3 , 3 3.
m E 3m I 1 _
z E -
U a` a° a° a° a° z z a° z z a°
ao a 0
� N w M1p
y
-ms �
e �ft
•
M1 f4' ,� .a

&g&
\ { y])
\ \
3
[
-
-
/
\
({8\0
_
^-
W.
2
- -
\}}\'wl2z-6
}\oEWL0
\
\ \
/\\\Eu
ow
\}\
00
_
_ _
_
3
{
-
- -
{ \
\
)/\\/}\
\})\/\(/\
-� :
\\}\
\/j\\
.
/ )) /

o 0o
Z,w E w N yr - d
c m ct L.z�� aoEXN-ov - Q
�o v-h3 r. -6 w
o Eo ►✓�`ii FY_ V v0z... _ av� vEo,- a" _ � a
00
OuO CC a a �
Lz m-) m5, m w.3a wvm"
C°
r v
¢`� m >F `mw ¢za'v oa° �!� o o fn a`

zw v w N0-0:-
�-.
:
a-
r-
vLaoooz z�MaU
rz¢v"v�>VE-uv z>Maow wo
o'oZ _
vz ��mvvQ d v>vo o7`�z C<m c ¢zv a°rvv
-
yP m
3
3
go w
3 3 w L
3 C
z
O W W W W W C
nh
41,
"4' �✓# K} oe
a'J
m
�1
41
� Y
' t
M
e�.
w
W
00

w
o
2 E3vr - _o
=z �r�o zv��� m ro
FN aU m az�aa.
E--00
-
�m v� ELvrc� vZ a>
m m m w 3 a .rv- o
Q d o— 'v_a —mEw oTi�� am o3.E
z m�a ,'n C7 ¢` ¢� m >F `mw ¢zv v oa .c.-
w
L.L
00
LL
w
0 o rn a`
zL
wv
m
r? N
O p� CC
a` a`
IF
O �
V

wco L. Eo aon` ZF�r►✓.�z`Si; ,wm3LLO `zOd_ m��.C�aC UNVcF�Yt N QCV 0°.vrnz��v� ` `ow z�-v�y�vr�a "=>T_i a.m
�oQw
v d N
E w .aLvoXNWE�v
o sv
10 w
aU V=o°- a m Ervr0.89 avZ (� 0_0
�o L�
vz -mo, m m3ac
mz�_ 2V
°vrnv m oa° azma`
am0a''o 7

o 0o
Z,w E w N yr - d
c m ct L.z�� aEZx- -to — Q
�o v-h3 r. -6 w
a U v m v t5 Z V �o„ a"� - -
_">
z a m v rv;,� avv az.
O O�CC N C �"OI uZ uwv a > `"-.ate .. L�
mcwr mm�o, `m 1° w.3av L, a z
vz... _ - _ r v
a` a` z° m�a C7 ¢` ¢`� m >F `mw ¢zv'm oa° �!� o o fn a`
n
t M N
s
h�.
s
4
m
..F✓"s"_
t
r.
i
` ♦ .; ,�d'. � /. gig
M yg \
"s, a
n ryryry .f
s'
$� +
. v
ol
ta
of
ko
1*4
.40
40
E E 2E
z o a z
0 0 0 0
W u W u
c Ic IRz z°
29 f' r_ r_
3 3 w z° 3 w z 3
W m N a m m
F m
z mm m m m
d }t o o `v `v `v ``v, a s o a a o
U a a a a a z z z z z z
001 o®o11

o 0o
Z,w E w N yr - d
c m ct L.z�� aoEXN-ov - Q
�o v-h3 r. '6 w
L. o� aU vm v oa ZV 2=p°�'a"v - - 00
�Lvr c0 avv-_ aZ a"> C700
O O�CC N C On uZ uwv a > `2. ao .. LL
E .Si F Y Y Q £ cU yr mm�rn `m 10 w.3av L� n z
oo �i _ V vz... _ — _ r v
¢ O V Q d _ >ja...w�Ev :_off'`` `-' 3
a` a` z° m�a C7 ¢` ¢`� m >F `mw ¢za'v oa° �!o o o wo a`
o LL o o
.reL m m
Y Y
m m
z z
v v
a v v a
y e e
`m
a
o
o
v
3 w z a w z a
1�. 3 z z v
o o m m m m w w v w w
a° a° a° a° z z 0 z z a°
a
`wF M n
s'
r :r
A
r
44
;:� ":tee '�-.,� ,�! '�• � % e, r � e
r am. 14
yy 4,
.. r i l• � sr � J" r
,li

ZL
W E
c � LL 3mv
j z a
r? N
O p� CC
o G
a � U
a` a`
a
o
w E o-° oLU
-0 wo yr _ °'
FN aU m az�a �� "„ ---
�m v� ELvrc� vZv a>
N C —"On uZ 6w v a > `v-.a�
m w m m w 3 a .rwow-v- o
Q d — > j a — m E m o Ti E o3 .E
a � _
ia
r
r �
o m
o d
0
w
� Y
00
z
0 o rn a`
V

v=
o
o m
w
w
o�
ova yr
d
Z
E
N
�'�
W2 8-8
E
a'W.
_
Fz 3
°]m n
Uz
a
p
�n o
0WE 2v
o v=
aZ
n ">
O
O�CC
N
C
Eryr�v
wwa°'
�ww a >
`"-.ate
(� 00
LL
�"On uZ
mows
`m
..
E
.Si F
Y
Y
Q£
vz... _
1°
mm�o,
- ...
_
w.3av
L�
r v
a z
O
V
Q
d
_
>ja...w�E�
C7
¢za'v
o rn a`
im
�Amr
ry � LL
E o o
m E a m E a
3 - -
`o
3 0 z o z
3 E 3 EiZ
3
z a w z
m`v `m 'v u `o 'v 'v `o
w 3 K z z
20 a a a a
U m m m m m z z m z z m
ao 111111 o .. o
,S
i
n"
W

o 0o
Z,w E w N yr - d
c m ct L.z�� aoEXN-ov — Q
�o v-h3 r. '6 w
oa` iO az�m � mrvz...�_v �rn= :20 Z� m Lr_
o C0C)
O�u`"
0 Z wv maLL
E �wr °w3zF v�v v
`uwmom``
E¢ `°£ ovj.v-vv
` Fv ° `
zwo�a C7 ¢¢� m ¢z� m m o
N N

o �o
Z,w E w N
c m ct L.z�� ao�x0vow — Q
Fz; 3 m�L Uz w o v�
Ervr�� avv - aZ a€' o 00
►✓` O OI o cl uwv a > a `Lr3`-'
ao o rn av LL
mc,
vzm_ am >jo vv .2wEo`
wwmrnv`ww�om°` ur7` _`
za ¢¢�� za-0 e
e
N e
vc (
^ram.; � • � 5a �" � ` ��
� ` a
[ � F
1

2 / W o
w v W N o v `v o m
a10E xL^wov
E 3 m0)i Uz COL
�°a"�o,o
amo Ez N r.��-
E 8
�w
Vm
€v,�0
m r
E } Y Y Q
7 `� " mv�a
a_v "voz '?a� v v
E-sa
oa°
z`¢mm�a ¢� FB ¢zry
� r
t
■®�
'o
0
z°
a
z
0

o �o
Z,w E w N yr _ d
-'E
m ct L.z�� ao�XNWEov - Q
jFz; 3 10 Uz w �n�o v" r. sv" w
o o�LGC acLi v z¢ z E�ow a -- N
,U � E r v r 0 � a v v � Zo a "> 0C)
O p�CC (n C �"On uZ � w a > `"-.ate .. LL
E .Si F Y Y Q£ m�wrmz� m m�o, `m 1° w.3av L� a z
G G O V Q d o_ > j a .� w m E w .> o n:= E 3 -
a` a` z m0a 0, C7 ¢` ¢`� m >F `mw ¢za'v oa° �!0 0 o 0 a`
3
E
E
3
0 z
0 z
E-wZE-wZ
3
3
3
3
3
w z a
w z a
a
3
-
k
�m E 3
`m 'v 'v
V O
u 'v O
z - -_ --
E E -
a a
E E-
a a
U a
M z z m
z z m
-ao
®.U,,
m.
„7ri
M"
r�

¢
Y y
W E-
o
_E
U
WcE'
o
0
^ Z
R •�
!Z ML)
z�E� o
Z 16 N
0
v)m
z c -
z —
o
E O
mal
`o
42
2 a
o N
E E E E E
z° G z
c
`o
O 5w m mA
W m
.N E 3333 3 3 333333333 3 3 333 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 33333
—
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
—
—
—
— —
— —
—
—
— —
—
—
—
—
— —
c—
�
o
� c =
_ _
_
_
Tl'
ti
d
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3
3 3

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: w 0jev I Project/Site: 34Z5,,, 4 cv,
Evaluator: SI'tt-lb
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if z 19 or perennial if 30*
County:
JSC-NWW-lp
S1,
S �'l
Latitude: 35 12 3 g% 7
Longitude: 77d7s72
Stream Determination (circle o Other
Ephemeral Intermittent rPerennial e.g. Quad Name: �EG,
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0
1
2
2
3
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
i57
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
q)
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
/
1
2
3
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
, ,.
0
0.5
0.5
1
1 1.5
1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes, 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B_ Hvdrnlnnv [Suhtntal = )Z 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
6
01
2
14. Leaf litter
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
''0.
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes n= 3
C. Bioloav !Subtotal = lv � ]
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1.5
23. Crayfish
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
0
1
1.
25. Algae
0
.5
1
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =s'1.
Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: LA 1 ' I A
Sketch: at
f4+ IT
�;f1F

JSC-NWW-2i
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: ) Project/Site: u yci
Evaluator. County:
I � vim► y
Total Points: Stream Determinaiia
Stream is at least intermittent 22 Ephemera termittl
if z 19 or r erennial if Z 30* '
Latitude: 3S, 7
v, Longitude: _-7,? 07f8V 7
ircle one) Other Perennial e.g. Quad Name: �4 �XnJ
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = i )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
%
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1 '
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
` _
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches _
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1'
2
3
B. Headcuts
C-.
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.
5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
`artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R I-lurirnlnQ11MM0I = '�-15 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
1
2 3
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1 ?
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
.1.5
1 0
1tf.5
1.,
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
I No = 0
Yes = 3)
('. Rinlnnv Iqi ihtntnl = I n 'I
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish -
23. Crayfish
3
0
0
0
2
1
0
1
2
3
1
2
3
0.5 - 1
0.5 1 1
1.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
`.0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: PA F11 t r e„

JSc-Nww-5i
l45Al
.Nu liwv stream laentincation rorm version 4.11
Date: . / 2 J Project/Site: ls" I L Latitude: 3 f, t Ot
Evaluator: County: Longitude: 17 (�
Total Points: Stream Determ?-=::=n (%.:rcle one) Other #eW b-e-,Al
Stream is at least intermittent 7-1 Ephemem: Inl:eimi-lent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
if a 19 or r,erennial if a 30"
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 8 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
,
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
c O'�
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
7
3
8. Headcuts
!
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
hlo =.0
Yes = 3
`artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R Nvrirnlnnwr lGi+h+ntal - =r- 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0...
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
r0/
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
13:5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
1Yes = 3
r- Rinlnrnr !C11h4nfQl = (tap 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
r
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
n:.
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
' 0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
i.
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: D \4 i~
�:�,'`lnnaQ. l:��
t'7�s5crv�c.St;e� � UG�
co Y ad C1 C
��►�MGvL� ��e,i�

JSC-NWW-Sp
NC DW(
Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: G L Za Project/Site: I<SS_4� (
Evaluator: ;1 uh o- n � County: Ya�1er+
Total Points: Stream Determination (circie one)
Stream is at least intermittent �g Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
if;,- 19 or , vrennial if a 30*
Latitude: 67
Longitude:-?l �6(1
Other A-7) oe-vj
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
1"Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
Absent
Weak
1
1
Moderate
2
_ .--- 2:)
Strong
3
3
0
0
0
,
(�
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
' n
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
;' 1`)
2
3
8. Headcuts
0.
1
2
3
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
VQ
0.5
1
1.5
0
0.5
71
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
artmciai ancnes are not ratea; see aiscussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 2
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
0
1
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
,:i
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1'
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
n
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes -'3
G. 131010gy (Subtotal = 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
'3 .
3 )
2
2
1
1
0
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0:
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
(11
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
1.
e .h,.
;,l ,}elRptct
(ewer,
elrr.rr`Y �- s^.�'1. �.,rr w
pG�"� �"l+� !!w c -�C, d
.. / � Lr�
Sketch: (,,,roc e-6W 5
�ereh,ma) �)bw. I Ha� S[n '' 4 15 04�4"_Jttt
VW A,
Y f
1458
j I
tye%,l1 Lir�Fc// l�C f r g
!j ,

USACE AID#
DWQ #,
JSC-NWW-5p
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: CJ-f o L �/cG. %%C'`w 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: L L-i 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream:_.. ,� 12V 6. River basin: 0Jet C, 0
7. Approximate drainage area:_..n.` l a � � 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: 10. County: ��rt vP
11. Site coordinates (if known):prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): _ _ - I` t Qr p 0 Longitude (ex.-77.556611): 1 77 - 0 6 ad r�
Method location determined (circle): ^ Topo Sheet Crtho
Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evalu 'ori(note nearby roadttach map identifying stream(s) location):
lQ`�'Li.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): ea r r d t Y", 0—o ,,� r Jr' n r a 04 Ow
15. Recent weather conditions: V
16. Site conditions at time of visit: k a �J
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES �If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES N® 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NCj
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential
_% Forested
22. Bankfull width: Ic I
24. Channel slope down center of stream: L--�Flat (0 to 2%)
25. Channel sinuosity: "Straight _Occasional bends
'5'0 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( _
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): Z S
_Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
_Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): "'% Comments: J � i �h
Evaluator's Signature / Date
This channel evaluation form 5: inteaed to' be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data requirM-by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

JSC-NWW-5p
STREAM (QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHVET
1:CURF,
-UN POINT
RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
Presence of flo» I persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5s
(nu flow or saturation 0, strong flow max points)
-
Ey-idence of past human alteration
U-fi
0-5
l)-5
(extensive alteration � 0; no alteration mat paints)
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0 -
(no buffer - 0; contiguous, wide buffer max points)
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
�s.
(exensi—ve-e..-idischargesdischarges a_x points)
a
�m
-
n-;
0_4
0_4
(no discharge 0. springs, seeps. wetlands. etc. max points)
-3
U
rn
_
r h
Presence of adjacent noodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
0
(no floodplain - 0. extensive floodplain - max paints)
7
Entrenchment l floodplain access
0-S
0-4
7
0-2
v
(deeply entrenched 0; frequvnt flooding max points)
1
1
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0 • 6
0-4
U
(nu wetlands 0; large adjacent wetlands max. points)
_ _..... _ Channel sinuosity
0- i
0-4
0- 3
b
(extensive channeliLation 0; natural meander max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0- a
e-mensiv-e deposition 0; little or rice sediment max points.)
I I
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0.4
0-5
(tine, homogenous 0; large, diverse sires max points)
Evidence of channel incision or widening t;
{).;
0-4
0. 4;
(dee lv incisedax Dints)
p__.
13
-
of major bank failures
l
0-
t)_i
11-�
(severe erosion - 0, no erosion. stable banks max points)
I-
..........
_.
pa
14
hoot depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0 5
(no visible roots 0: dense roots throughout max points)
�
vs
I?
1
impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
.
0-5
tt- l
0-
(.substantial impact D; no evidence tttax pcitnls)
I(r
Presence of riffle-poollripple-pool complexes
0-3
015
t)-6
(no rifflevripples or pools = 0: well -developed max points)
d
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
'Z
(little or net habitat 0; frequent, varied habitats max points)
M
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
(net shading vegetation _ 0; continuous canopt- max points)
T
_
19
NA''
I U-4
U-a
(deeplN embedded _ 0: loose stricture niax)
2 0
I Presence ofstream invertebrates (see }sage 4)
i) - i
_
l (no evidence 0. conini �n, numerous types - toax points)
>0
21
l resence of amphibians
() _ t
0-4
0.43
p
(no evidence 0. cotnnum, numerous t\pcs max points)
i
Oa
`�
Presence of fish
0 4
C) -1
0_4
3
!nu evidence 0, coinnion. numerous types max points)
�V
EVidenee o(wildlife use
6
!) `
0 {
too evidence 0, abundant evidence - max points)
Total Points Possible
� 100
100
� 100
TOTAL SCORE talsts irony tin first page)
l liese characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
2

JSC-NWW-6i
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date. j j-
Project/Site:
---
Latitude:
Evaluator: '�
County:
Longitude: J r`; 077%/�
Other
Total Points:
Stream Deter tion (circle one)
Sireem is at leas[ lr+terrriiltr ;++
Ephemeral I fermi ent Perennial
c.g- Quad IVarre:
if a 19 or perennial if ? 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = }
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1` Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1 .,
2
3
�. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
/ 1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. ride -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict fioodplain
0 -
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
r'_ 0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
r 2'
3
S. Headcuts
0-"
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0_ `
0,5
1
1 1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0.
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
/0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
11 t
0.5
0
15. Sediment on p ants or debris
0
0.5
!
1-5
16. Organic debris lines or plies
0 0.5
No = 0
1 1-5.
Yes = 3.
_ _
17. Soil -based evidence of high water Cable? v-
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
- ° 2 )
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
D;
1
2.
3
22. Fish
`0
0.5
' 1
1.5
23. Crayfish
r 0 --
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBt- = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
c

JCS-NWW-6i
.N'U VV Q't a:an-t ta19-Afafncation it•orm Version 4.11
Date -- __ ._ _ _ __.
`r"• /, Project)Site: r Latitude: '
Evaluator: County: Longitude: -
Total Points: - Stream Qetermjnation (circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent �- E� J Ephemeral Iritermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name: /V 11;ja C`i(r•�
if c 19 or erenniai' if ? 30' 2
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = �7
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
12 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along tholweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size cf stream substrate
0
1
'2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1)
3
6. Depositional tsars or trenches
fl
1
;
3
7. Recent alluvi-al deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0.
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5 .
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No - 0,.
Yes = 3
artinc+af aftcnes ere not rated; see discussions In manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2f)
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1 _j
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1..
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
L.. t-slnlnnv dHuntntw = i I
18, Fibrous roots in streambed
3 j
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthas (note diversity and abundance)
I] _
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
d
1
2
3
22. Fish
23, Crayfish
0
0
0.5
(V
1.5
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0 75
BC = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be idenfitied using other txrelhods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
7�/

JSC-NWW-6p
NC []W Stream identiiic°atiori Form Version 4.11
Date: - %.
Projectl5ite: r4.Latitude:
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude:
TotaPoints,
� r
-.-.__ --=-- --
Stream Determination circle one
Other
stlea
Steam is of least rr7termif' �!. �
Ephemeral Intermittent. Perennial
e.g. Quad Name::f��'
if'� 99 or perennial if ? 3G`
A. Geomorphology {Subtotal = j`, }
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strang
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2. '
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2-•.
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2.
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
4 2
3
9. Grade control
0:'
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0-5
1 ;
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3,
`artificial ditches are not rated: see discussion_ s in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
i 2.
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1 '..
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles _
0
1 0.5
1
1_ 1.5
17. Soil -based evdence of high Neater table?
No = 0
Yes.'= 3
C. Biology (Subtotal
18. Fibrous roots ui streambed
' 3`
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0�
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
4.�
1
2
3
22. Fish
0 _
0.5
1 .'
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Arnphibians
0
0.5
1 .'
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACbV = 0.75; ORLr-1.5
Other = C
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods- See p- 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 5,�5b JSC-NWW-6p
Date:
Project/Site: 3R
Latitude: 3j ,) J72'tb
Evaluator: " { 'Y3
County:
Longitude: ►77, b5043
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent �j�,�
Stream Determ'nation (circ� ?.
Ephemeral Intermittent,Perennial
Other v%y 17
e.g. Quad Name: / 64^1
if>_ 19 or perennial if-, 30"
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank �.
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalvveg
0
1
(_2) _
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri ;- ..^leool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodp lain
0
1
3
0
1`
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes:= 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discus , ns in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 9�
C. Biology Subtotal = `
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
to
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
A2
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FA = 0.75; OBL
= `. Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: � 1 �

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions I JSC-NWW-6p
Width:
(p Site: p
_._....._...__.____._._.._..._._._._.._.......
.........._.__..._._..__e.a.____._ ao
Height: a
Depth water: ` �0 � Notes
Natural line impressed on bank
Shelving
Chanqes in character of soil
Destruction of terrestrial vegetation
Presence of litter and debris
Vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
Sediment sortina
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away
Scour
Deposition ; v
Multiple observed flow events
Bed and banks .
Water staining
Change in plant community

USACE AID# DWQ #
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the55� following information for the stream reach under
assessment:
��RR
1. Applicant's name: M�lr�? API'A _
V *,,,- JSC-NWW-6p
2. Evaluator's name: AW-%
3. Date of evaluation:
4. Time of evaluation: 3 Z�
5. Name of stream: NT F" S3''M f
6. River basin: /✓it
7. Approximate drainage area:
8. Stream order:
�,y
9. Length of reach evaluated:--,_ d t
10. County: `
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 7Y m ZZ
Longitude (ex.—77.556611): -
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho
(Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known:
_Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _
Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation
point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 12 No Residential
_% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Forested
_% Cleared / Logged _% Other; )
22. Bankfull width: f
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%)
_Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight ,Occasional bends
_Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality. --�
Total Score (from reverse): Comments: S�� A�ff ku h44
Evaluator's Signaturer' fi Y Date 41PI
This channel evaluation foo-m is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and vets iro mental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET JSC-NWW-6p
E6_)kiE(.4 N_1 IRANT RANI F
E'1<iAi�At'T'i+:RiS7'i(`5
astalPiedmont
MountainSCOREPresence
of flon / persistent pools in stream
_ 5
F(0)
0-4
0. 5
(no flu" or saturation 0; strong tlo►r max points)
Evidence of past human alteration
0 - h
0-5
0 - 5
,
(extensive alteration 0, no alteration max points)
I
'
Riparian zone
0- 6
0- 4
0-
(no bul"fer - 0; contiguous, wide buffer -inax p)ints)
t) i
0 -
() _
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
(extensive discharges - 0, no discharges max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
t) _ ,
0-4
() _
(no discharge 0: springs, seeps, "etlands, etc. max points)
Presence of adjacent noodplain
0-4
0 -
0 -
(no floodplain : U. extensive floodplain - inax points)
Entrenchment / nnodplain
A
access
0-_{
0-4
0-2
(�
dee 1
i ( p } entrenched � 0; frequent flooding max points)
S
Presence of adjacent wetlands
I)-h
0 4
0•2
(nu tetlands 0, lame adjacent %%ctlands maxpoints)
9 Channel sinuosity
() - ; 0-4 U..
1
(extensive channelization 0; natural meander max points)
a
,�
-
!(1
Sediment input
0-5
� 0-4
0-4
(extensive deposition 0: little or no sednnent ntax points)
NA*
0-4
0-5_
l
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
i1
(tint:, homogenous 0; large, diverse sizes max points)
0-5
0-4
0-5
`
Evidence of channel incision or widening
(deer),, incised = 0, stable bed & banks max points)
E�-
I'(severe
Presence of major bank failures
-
0-5
0 - ;
0. 5
.
erosion 0; no erosion. stable banks max points)
�
� 14
Root depth and density on hanks
p -
0-3
0-4
-
0-5
E�+
{
(nu visible root` il; dense rt*)ts throughout max points)
0-5
0-4
0-5
1 impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
13
(substantial impact U. ito evidence max points)
t�
�. _
Presence of riffle -pool ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0 - G
i (no ritiles'ripples or pools 0: well-develorW max points}
F
�
_
17
Habitat complexity
()-6
0-6
fl-i'i
3
F,
(little or no habitat 0; frequent, varied habitats max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
_
0-5 0-5 0-5
x
(no shadingvegetation - 0^ continuous canop v ins, points)
I4
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
u - 4
(deeph embedded - 0: loose sinicture max)
0-4
0-5
0-5
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
2O
(no evidence 0: common. numerous types maxpoints)
Presence of amphibians
0 4
0- 11
0-4
p
(no evidence U: cunnuon, numerous ttiN pcs tn_a+, pt>ints}
k
"
*4
Presece of Vsh
0-4
0 4
0-`a
�4
(no evidence O, uu niunnnvmera Uly rvs imax points)
Evidence of wildlife use
0 0
0 5
0 5
(no evidence 0; abundant evidence nlax points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
I
100
TOTAL SCORF (also enter on firsi
page)
* 7 hew characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
N

JSC-Nww-7i
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 99 -)�
Date: ref !qi �;p
Project/Site: T � R �
Latitude: 3 l2D50 -7
Evaluator: S,-4 .� [.
County: ,.oy�
Longitude: -77, 080/103
Total Points:
Sf_,
Stream Determ ination-.jcircle one)
Ephemeral intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
19or erennfinfermittenf
if z f 9 or perennial if>_ 30`
e
.-4
A. Goomorpholo y {Subtotal = } ,
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank t i
0
,.
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri rle-;: ool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
2
3
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0'
11
2
3
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
0' 0.5
0 0.5
1
1.5
1 1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
_
No - 0 .,
I Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = r57__ _)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
ti 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.55
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0
0.5
0.5
z:
1'
1.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes :�' .3'
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
r0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
W0
S%
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
5'
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0 5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FAGW = 0.75; OBL =
"perennial streams may also be identified using othgr methods. See p. 35 of manual.
1.5 Other
Notes: Su1�'_4 h
Sketch' �t

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination JSC-NWW-7i
5p '&"
Dimensions � - � u,aJI ,�¢, Site:
Width _. %_. m
Height:._...e�.
Depth water: i.Z �� ��� Notes
Natural line impressed on bank
Shelving
Changes in character of soil V
Destruction of terrestrial vegetation
i
Presence of litter and debris
Wracking
Vegetation matted down, bent, or absent 11 V
3
Sediment sorting
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away
Scour
I
Deposition
Multiple observed flow events
..._...._.___...._.__.__....__._.__..e._.e__..._._...............------- -
Bed and banks �
Water staining I V
Change in plant community
Other:
90
IA/
J V-1, --,-i
i
1 y
a
I (Y
F
i £F
1
i

USACE AID#
DWQ#
JSC-Nww-7i
Site # (indicate on attached map)
m STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AQP
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name:
2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation:
: '
4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: U{'f'
6. River basin: /VL' AW-
7. Approximate drainage area:
9. Length of reach evaluated:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): J 5' /2 o S­0 -7
8. Stream order:
10. County: t'.e
12. Subdivision name (if
Longitude (ex.-77.556611):
-,77 ©r//U
Method location determined (circle): ` GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other H ,
13. Location of reach under evaluatiou liiote nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
4
5P& yp.1 r: 1 n Am
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES ' G If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES (NO J 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 1 o % Residential/ 47% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
% Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other f)
22. Bankfull width: _ _ _ w _ 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: K Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity:Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:lid �5 )r
Evaluator's Signature ,r.�'!) 1� ` 1 Date l,,'ZD
This channel evaluation %Yrne is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

JSC-Nww-7i
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
l V0C)RKGI-0-?1-4
60— NT
RANGE
�
CHARACTERISTICS ER STICS
i coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
st'om',
I
Presence of flaw f perststenf pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
S
tno flow car saturation 0, strong floe max points)
ry
Evidence of past human alteration
0.6
0-5
0.5
b
(extensive alteration 0; no alteration niax pciinis)
a
Riparian Lone
U- G
0-4
(1- S
(no buffer -- 0; contiguous, wide buffer max points)
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
(extensive discharges 0; no discharges max points)
Groundwater discharge
0 - ;
'
_
(no discharge - 0. springs, seeps, vetlandN, etc. max points)
0-4
h Presence of adjacent noodplain
0 d
0
{�
—
(no floodplain : 0: extensive floodplain - inax paints)
_ _
_ _
....
7
Entrenchment f Ilnodplain access
0-5
0 4
ti 2
(deeply entrenched - 0, frequent flooding max points)
W —
_......._
S
Presence of adjacent w•ctlands
0•G
0-4
0-2
(nu wetlands 0: large adjacent wetlands max points)
0-5
0-4
0- 3
9 Channel sinuosityi
�%
(extensive channclization 0, natural incandcr max paints)
0-5
0-4
0-4
57
!(1
Sediment input
(extensive deposition 0; little or no sedinient max points)
NA*
0-4
0 - j
I 1
I Size & diversity of channel lied substrate
(fine homogenous 0; large, diverse sizes max points)
0-5
()
0 -
d
I, Evidence of channel incision or widening
( cep y incised ■ () stable bed &- banks rnax points)
i
m .f-- 4. -
Presence of major bank failures
-
y
�
( = 0: no erosion. stable banks max points)
severe erosion
14 Root depth and densih on banks
(no visible roots - 0: dcnsr rests throe -shout maa points)
_
Impact by agriculture, livestock. or timber production
3
(substantial impact 0, no cVidlnce roux points) m _
a
Its
Presence of riffle-poollripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
(no rifl'lestripples or pools 0. welt -developed max points)
2
Habitat Complexity17 0-6
0-618
(little car no habitat 0; frequent, varied habitats max points)
Canopy coverage over sireambed
tno shading vegetation - 0; continuous canopy rnax points) -
T
1y
Substrate etnbeddcdticss
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deepl) embedded _ 0: Incase stricture rnax)
-)0
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0- i
0- 5
!J
(no evidence 0; common. numerous t\pes (nay points)
>'
—
1
Presence of amphibians -
1
0-4
0-4
I
( y pono evidence - 0; comnion, numerous ty- p cs maxis)
27
Presence of fish
0 ,1 1
0-4
0- 1
2
(no evidence 0; common. numerous t) pes sax points)
1
2;
Evidence of wildlife use
0 t>
0 5
1 0 5
Z
(no evidence 0, abundant evidence may points)
i
1"0181 Points Possible
100
100
#Ot)
TOTAL SCORE ( iso enter on first page)
* these characteristics are not assessed in coastal mreams
2

JSC-NWW-7p
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 S54 _p
Date: �, i
- �'�
Pro' ctJSite:
TA I �' � ✓,
Latitude:
5, /2 20"D
Evaluator j;-" . • , /r �,y„I
County: y�,n
Longitude: --77QgO31Y
Total Points:
lffa
Stream Determination (circle o401 -,,
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial '
OtherStr-/
e.g. Quad Name:
3ittent
ifam 19orp terms
if z 19 or nerennra! if � 30"
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = I P I
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank ,f,
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalvreg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le-Rool sequence
0
1
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
3
5. Active/relictfloodplain
0
1
' 2)
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
]-'
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
C]'
0.5
1
1.
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.S
11. Second or greater order channel
No ,= 0 }
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal =+ )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
C. Bioloov !Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3,=
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
7
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0_5
1.5
24. Amphibians
Q
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other; 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 or manual.
Notes: MOY a
Sketch: ~'r

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions SS JSC-NWW-7p
_ _ _
Width: $. �, Site: —
�F&
Height'-
Depth water: Notes
Natural line impressed on bank
Shelving
Changes in character of soil
Destruction of terrestrial vegetation
Presence of litter and debris
Vegetation matted down, bent,
Sediment sorting
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away
Multiple observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
Change in plant community

USACE AID# DWQ # ._..._. _ __-_ Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET .
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: _ __.._ __.___.... _ 2. Evaluator's name:._ JSC-NWW-7p
3. Date of evaluation:4. Time of evaluation: y+`� • '
5. Name of stream:
7. Approximate drainage area:
9. Length of reach evaluated:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3S. / 2 f 2 00
6. River basin: 11PAW
8. Stream order:
10. County: Yr,—? _
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude (ex.—77.556611): - 77
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
7
13. Location of reach under evaluation ' � yr - nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
�y (note n
y o �
14. Proposed channel work (if any): _
15. Recent weather conditions:A.:
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters , Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YEW NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: Residential % Commercial % Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Forested
22. Bankfull width:
% Cleared / Logged _% Other { ._.
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: V Flat (0 to 2%) !Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous !Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
TotaV Sc� we (i'ront reverse): Z Co!
/ 1 ._ . In- .. 1'ta"... ?I. A_
Evaluator's Signature �.t/ (I ' 6.+' i+ P Date
This channel evaluation firm is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.
1

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET JSC-NWW-7p
��,COREGION
POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
('iedmont
Mountain
_
0-5
0-4
0-5
1
_ M
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong now = max points)
_
2
0 - 6
0-5
0-5
Evidence of past human alteration
i. extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
(no buffer = 0; contiguous. wide buffer = maxpoints)
tp
4[?-5
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-4
0-4
(extensive discharges = 0; no_discharLes = max Dints)
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
'1
Q
(no discharo e = 0: s rinks, seeps, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
Presence of adjacent floodplain
6
0-4
0-4
0-2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)_
7 Entrenchment / floodplain access
�
0-5
0--4
0-2
2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding. = max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
i no wetlands = 0: large adjacent wetlands = max points)
3 Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max poipts)
10 ( Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
LL-
extensive d-,.position-- 0; little or no sediment = max points)it
�
NA*
0-4
0-5
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
(fine, homogenous = 0, large.. diverse sizes Dints)
12
_max
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0 -
deeplu incised0; stable bed & banks = max points)
Presence of major bank failures
13
0-5
0-5
0-5
L
)severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max Tints)
Root depth and density on banks
14
0-3
0-4
0-5
z no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
0-5
0-4
0-5
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
t substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
0-3
0-5
0-6
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
�
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well -developed = max points)
-
17
-
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
L,
E�
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
Aq
�
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
,x
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max omts)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(dueplN embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
)
(no evidence = 0: common, numerous types _. maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O
(no evidence - 02ccrnmon, numerous types - maxpoints)_
a Presence of fish
O 22
0-4
0-4
0- 4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous rw es = maxpoints)
Evidence of wildlife use
23
0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence =max Dints
100
l00
100
Total Points Possible
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

JSC-NWW-9i
55R * 35.120847
[� 77.078038
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Dater "lAZ�
ProjectfSite:�afjl,,
Latitude:
Evaluator. 5k/li j (I'WA
County:
Longitude: �;: •�'
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if>_19orperennial if>_30* ��
rcle one )
Stream Dete�atior�tPerennial
Ephemeral, ntermitte
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =.? } .,
Ab ent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0.
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
t,
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
°
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1 1
1.5
10. Natural valley
J
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discuss
iCg�s in manual
Q 1..1.,AJ 11^ .,� ,ei k+r,+ol - ?"C 7 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0
1
1.5
16, Organic debris lines or piles
0
q 5J
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes,= 3
rL2inlnnv !Q1 ih*n4a1 = I 1
-- ----------------
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
i
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
!
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0'
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
' )
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5)
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
l3'
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
O
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0-�
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other r 0
*perennial streams mar also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Y'1A wt
Sketch:
It
4

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions JSC-NWW-9i
Width: t �j Site:
., 4O9%
Height: �
Depth water: 41 ` 4F� � Notes
Natural line impressed on bank a t�
Shelving
Changes in character of soil
Destruction of terrestrial vegetation
Presence of litter and debris
Wracking /
Vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
Sediment sorting
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away
Scour I�
Deposition h
Multiple observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
Change in plant community
Other:

JSC-NWW-12i
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 55/V
Date: �' � 2-p
Project/Site: '�t,4 Sjv,� �,
Latitude:
Evaluator: l�,�
County:
Longitude: -7705�?VS
Total Points:
Stream Det nati n_ circle one)
Other /1pwkl-w
Stream is at least intermittent
if>_ 19 or perennial ifz 30" 3 r
Ephemeral Intermitter : Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = I
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
10-Continuity of channel bed and bank r
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool seq.. uence
D
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
ID
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
_
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No ='
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. HArology (Subtotal = I),
12. Presence of Baseflow
a -
0
1
2
113. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
15
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
` .5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
f _0.
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
C. Biolony {Subtotal = 1, ) l
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
2
3
22. Fish
0
.5
L�_-
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
J,5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1..5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 5' Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: tx)N� 4if�`tA ..)� &V

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions
�A -A�
Width_ . Lam. ....__.._...... L�
Height: cko
Depth water:
Natural line impressed on bank
Shelving
I `
Changes in character of soil � ✓
Destruction of terrestrial vegetation
Presence of litter and debris
E
Wracking ; V`
Vegetation matted down, bent, or absen! y�
Sediment sorting
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away
I
Scour I
Deposition
Multiple observed flow events
Bed and banks ?
3
Water staining
Change in plant community
E
Other:
2
Site: 93 Al
N otes
JSC-NWW-12i

USACE AID# DW
Q # Site # (indicate on attached ma
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSpHEET
Aftp
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: )t, ,
A�, ► ^ �'f � Jsc-Nww- i ai
1. Applicant's name: IYOW =-ze A4 �Jg [� 2. Evaluator's name: , I t
f
3. Date of evaluation: 2D 4. Time of evaluation:= _
5. Name of stream: t' a z Id"�'-t 1' �Se 6. River basin: Awbe
7. Approximate drainage area:
9. Length of reach evaluated: Op
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
n
8. Stream order:
10. County:
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): Z) Lon itude (ex.-77.556611):
Method location determined (circle): GP Topo Sheet Orrfro (Aerial) P to/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evalu� (note nearby roads of„Ha marks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: ? )p
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: WCO/o Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
% Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other
22. Bankfull width: 1f7 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: JtFlat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total S re (fr m revers ): Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date �y7 f
This channel evaluation f m is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and en ironmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

01",
STREAM QUAL]TV ASSESSMENT WORKSH LET JSC-NWW-12i
CHARACTERISTICS
Presence of how / persistent pools in stream
flow or saturation 0, strong flov% max points)
2 Evidence of past hum -an alteration
(extensive alteration - 0; no ahcrafion max points)
Riparian zone
(no buffer - 0; contiguous, wide buffer max points)
I T6 t WC—GRA tl-60Nlr RANGE.
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
0-5 0-4
1, .6 0-5 0-5
D -
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges tt
4
(extensive discharges , 0; no discharges max points)
Groundwater discharge
(no discharge 0, springs, steps, wetlands, etc. max points)
Presence of adjacent noodplain
6
0-4
UD (no floodplain - 0; extensive floodplain - max points)
>1 t
Entrenchment nondplain access
7
0-5
(deeply entrenched - 0, frequent flooding - max points)
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 1
0 6
(no wetlands - 0; larg-ge adjacent wetlands max puints)
0-5
9 Channel sinuosity
(extensive channelization 0; natural nwandct max points)
10 Sediment input
0-5
(extensive deposition 0; little or no sediment nia-A points)
NA*
Sue & diversity of channel bed substrate
(tine, homogenous 0; large, diverse sizes max points)
Evidence of channel incision or widening(deepK
incised 0, stable bed & banks max points)
E.
Presence or major bank failures
0
(severe erosion : 0-- no erosion_ stable banks max points)
'2
14
Root depth and densit) on hanks
0-3
(nu visible toots 0: dense rtx)ts throughout hout max points)
0-5
15
Impact bi agriculture, livestock. or timber production
(substantial impact 0,noevidence max paints)
16
Presence of riffle-pooltripple-pool complexes
0-3
(no ri)llesApples or pools r 0. well-devc1oped inux points)
0-6
17
Habitat complexity
(little ornoliabitai 0-, frequent, varied habitats maxpunits)
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
18
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canop} max points)
-
19
Substrate embeddrdness
NA*
(deepl% embedded = 0; loose siructure max)
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0-4 1
(no evidence 0: common. numerous types - max points)
Presence of amphibians
2 1 U - 4
0 (noevidence 0,common, numerous types maxpoints}
C) Presence of fish 0 4
(nu evidence 0,cumnion.numerous t%pes ina\pt-witits)
23 Evidence of wildlife use 0
(no evidence 0, abundant evidence - ma\ pointsi
Total Points Possible 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
i�These c-haracter-i—stics--are not assessed in coastal screams
2
0-4
0 - j
0-4
0-4
0-4
0-4
0-4
0-2
0-4
0-2
0-4
U-2
0-4
0-3
0-4
0-4
0-4
0-5
0-4
0
0-5
0-4
0-5
0-5
0-6
0 to
0-6
0-5
0-5
0-4
()-4
0-5
0.5
0-4
0-4
0 4
0 -.4
100 100
SCOR11, �
P

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 SAS Jsc-Nww-14;,_
Date: ` 2P Project/Site: ��ck S, Y'711�+ GPI Latitude: 75. f 2 it 07
Evaluator: County: 4*V Longitude:.77,�3K�%
Total Points: 2 7� Stream Dete C7 ;-ircle one) Other 6s�
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemera ntermittnnjz Perennial e.g. Quad Name: ,r
if � 19 or perennial ifz 30"
A. Geornorphology (Subtotal
F Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0
1
1
2
z
3
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sec uence
j/
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
2
3
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
C
1
1
2
2
3
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts=`
,'
1
2
3
9. Grade control:
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel -,VS;-r
No = 0
Yes 3'
aniTiciai aucnes are not rates; see aiscussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = i 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
`'C_
2
3
14. Leaf litter
i; i.5)
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
U. 1610100V (Subtotal = 1 i, `; )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3`y
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
'+
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
j
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
l ,
1.5
25. Algae
0.'
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 5 ' Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: VbM
Sketch:7'(��
11 0

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions ¢' Site: JSC-NWW-14i
Width: �
m
Height:
ko ��
Depth water: 2 �O `So e Notes
Natural line impressed on bank
Shelving
Changes in character of soil
Destruction of terrestrial vegetation i
.......... ___..---------- -.__........... __.....
..___._._---..--.__._ ___......
Presence of litter and debris
----- Wracking -._I _..�...�.._.
l I
Vegetation matted down, bent, or
Sediment sorting
E
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away •�'
i
Scour
Deposition
Multiple observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
E
Change in plant community V
Other:
N
4�41
d'4')9

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
C-11 —,AMR!,
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET011
5�S
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: 2. Evaluator's name:I, JSC NWW-14i
3. Date of evaluationi `, , ,' 4. Time of evaluation: 1 Z
5. Name of stream:yy 4r)n /"y 6. River basin: i r -p-
7. Approximate drainage
9. Length of reach evaluated: S�
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3 0, 1 2%1
8. Stream order:
10. County:
12. Subdivision name (if any): �1
Longitude(ex.-77.556611):_ —�7 Q�✓���
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under eva19:; r ecnf(note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
`' � � � "t--�.�r� };,3. �, r ° b� �r_ - _ _ ..�`� ✓''� ?�� -:� � � 55,E b 1
6
14. Proposed channel work (if any):' d
15. Recent weather conditions: r 5-a A^*-^) ),fv J�-
16. Site conditions at time of visit: MU
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
!Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters — Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-M
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? . YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: P21. Residential
T% Forested
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
12_°/a Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
_% Cleared / Logged % Other i
22. Bankfull width: l ?! 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):,
24. Channel slope down center of stream: &Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 40%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):
Comments:
Evaluator's Signature _. _ Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET JSC-Nww-14i
rCO CAPTS
PO
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
(no flow or saturation = 0; stror,� flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
0-6
0-4
0-5
Riparian zone
m
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = ax rots)
4Evidence
of nutrient or chemical discharges
0 5
0-4
0-4
3
(extensive discharges = 0: no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
3
d
(no discharge = 0; s rin s, seeps, wetlands. etc. = maxpoints)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0- 2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = maxpoints)
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
a
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
Presence of adjacent wetlands
8
0-6
0-4
0-2
no wetlands = 0: lar a adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
U'
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0- 4
0-4
deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max of )
_
—(extensive
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA
0-4
0-5
11
y, fine, homy venous = 0, larea. diverse sizes = max points)
'
0-5
0-4
0-5
d
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
'incised
4:c l� = 0: stable bed & banks = max Joints}
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
S-
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
3
E„
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throw flout = maxpoints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
5—
( substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
o - 5
0-6
(no or pools = 0; well -developed = maxpoints)
_riffles/ripples
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
( little or no habitat = 0: uent, vaned habitats = max oints}
�v
R4
1
Canopy coverage over streambed
0 - 5
0-5
0-5
(no shadve >etation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
m ,
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
--.
t d,•w ply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
t no evidence = 0: common. numerous t es = max oints)
�►
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
�-
O
(:10 evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
;�,
%.'e :22
Presence of fish
0- 4
0- 4
0- 4
i no evidence 0; common numerous es = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
'
I (no evidence = 0: abundant evidence =max pointsl
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2

JsC-NWW-15i
,i)J
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: - - Project/Site: _ � DA�l,�,y � '�_...Latitude: 3 S • !� y�t!a
Evaluator. p L
9�� County: �` r'_d-P A Longitude:
Total Points: Stream Dete ati c
Stream isatleast interrnittent ircle one} Other &/ ,
.'e 19 or renniai if? 30* _ + Jr Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = .S i
AbsentilT;
Strong
1", Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3.
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-pool,ri
3
le- ool se uence
0
4. Particle size of stream substrate
Activetrelict floodplain
0
35.
6. Depositional bars or benches
0g
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
•10,,3
8. Headcuts
2
3
9. Grade control
�Q
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0!
- Q5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
1Vo = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
-
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
s 3
13. Iron oxittizing bacteria
0
1
,' -.
--'
_
14. Leaf litter
1.5
` , 1 _
0 5
3
0
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0 5,.
'_1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0 5
r ;'; 7
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
T 5
_C. Biology {Subtotal = f'v I I
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
f, 3
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
-
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance}
p
1
1
-
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
1 2 3
2
22. Fish
0
0.5
t,5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
ce'
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0'
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW-"0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See
p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: D, �Ch i f (� d.
� D-, ( ,,- y , `- 1 last

JSC-NWW-15i
Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Chan
Destruction
Pres
Vegetation matte
Leaf litter dis
Multipi
Cha
Dimensions
Width: -�3 IZz Site: S q
Width: ra
Height: 0 a�
Depth water: !e ��'� Notes
Natural line impressed on bank k/
Shelving
ges in character of soil
of terrestrial vegetation
ence of litter and debris
Wracking f
d down, bent, or absent
Sediment sorting ,
turbed or washed away
Scour
Deposition
e observed flow events
I
Water staining
nge in plant community
Other:
Bed and banks

JSC-NWW-16i
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: � ) (0 -7 0 2 7
ProjecUSite: ,,,I, 'CAM4-tq ((Lq`t
Latitude: 35.115428
Evaluator. �,,�l.r,l, 'a
County: �raJa✓1
Stream Determination circle one)
Longitude:-77.075228
Total Points:
' .
Stream is at least intermittent ?
Other ,�,,,
ift19or rennialifa30
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad sine:
A. Geomorpholo y (Subtotal =}
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
' Ql
1
2 _
3
_
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sea uence
0
1
2
-._.
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
t g,�
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
-9 "
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
(
1
1
2
2
3
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
0'
1
2
3
9. Grade control
V
( 0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
'q 5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
I Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hlydroloay (Subtotal = 19
r 12. Presence of Basef low
0
1
,._�
3
1 13. Iron oxid;zing bacteria
0
1.5
1
1
2
,0.5
. 3
0
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
(�,0.5 J
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1 _
17. Soil -based evidence of high waster table?
No = 0
--"'Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 1_1
18. Fibrous roots.in streambed
- -
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 ,
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
4 f
0.5
1
1.5 •.-
25. Algae
0. ,
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other~_ 0`,
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: T2 �U-1 A5 t,olci
'jA_ poi r f-A oL
5iw l l 4�5

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions JSC-NWW-16i
Width: - ~' m Site: 5 IJ
Height:_ �40
Depth water: �` ho ���� Notes
Natural line impressed of
Sh
Changes in character
Destruction of terrestrial vegi
Presence of litter and
Wr
Vegetation matted down, bent, or
Sediment
Leaf litter disturbed or washe(
Depi
Multiple observed flow,
Bed and
Water si
Change in plant community
Other:

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
JSC-NWW-15i,16i I
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET /QSV
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: !� —1� ? -0 v\1 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: tr - 11) - ZOTis 4. Time of evaluation: I{
5. Name of stream: P).,s •4, <<( Sv .; / t_ / F.-,/, & P;v h.cin n/j, i t v-
7. Approximate drainage area: C, --441, w„ 8. Stream order: I
9. Length of reach evaluated: 100o - I 10. County: Ceti r-«
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): �1
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3 r
I U'1I Longitude (ex.-77.556611): �17 • (y b
Method location determined (circle): GP Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
p• r6��►rt S✓� a w► s..� ids k.�.l. � l.lat
14. Proposed channel work`lif any):
15. Recent weather conditions: iwt
16. Site conditions at time of visit:_• ` ­ _
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: qk% Residential
% Forested
22. Bankfull width: -f
24. Channel slope down cent of stream: Flat (0 to 2%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey?
YES NO
S % Commercial _% Industrial _%
Agricultural
_% Cleared / Logged _% Other (
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
_Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%)
_Steep (> 10%)
_Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided
channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments: s 1, l­ Xuir
Evaluator's Signature Date 6 ` I td —20 2 u
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Continent, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET JSC-NWW-15i,16i
SCORE G
##
CHARACTERISTICS
1
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
'ECORFGION-POINT-RAN"
0-5
U ' �
1
_�-----
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-4
(no flow or saturation . 0; strung flow - max points)
Evidence of past human alteration
' - -
0-6
0 _ i
0 - i
(extensive alteration 0; no aherdtion max paints)
-4.
Riparian zone
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer - max Dints)
[l • (t
0-4
U -
2
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges f
0-4
0-4
(extensive discharges - 0; no discharges - max points)
5 -g
Groundwater discharge
3
1
(no discharge - 0: springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. max points)
w _ _
- _
.
:
6
Presence of adjacent noodplain
0 2_
U
0.4
0-4
`D
(no floodplain = 0: extensive floodplain = max points) Y
a
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-3
0-4
0-2
2
1 _ (deeply entrenched _ 0; frequent flooding _max points)
0-?
g
Presence of adjacent wetlands
U•6
0-4
(no wetlands °- 0; large adjacent wetlands - max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0- s
0-4
0-3
(extensive channelization U; natural meander niax points)
—_
it)
Sediment input ��-
0-5
0-4
0-4
=
(extensive deposition 0; little or no sediment mat points)
! !
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
0 4
NAB
I
(tine, homogenous 0; large, diverse sizes - max points)
C) ;
Evidence of channel incision or widening
[) .
U - S
(deeply incised; 0; stable tx:d & banks = max points)
a
! ;
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
(1. 5
0-5
(severe erosion 0: no erosion, stable banks - max points)
0
14
Ront depth and density nn hanks
0-3
0-4
0-5
f
F
(no visible mots = 0; dense routs throu;�haut max points)
_- --
M
1 i
Impact by agriculture, livestock;, or timber roducOnn
0-5
0 4
0-5
(substanlia) impact 0; no evidence - max points)
_
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
16
0-3
0- ;
0-6
(no riffles?ripples or pools : 0; well -developed - max points)
17
complexity
0-6
0-6
_
d}'labitat
0-6
E.,
(little or no habitat - 0; frequent, varied habitats =- max points)
- -
18
0-5
0-
pq
Canopy coverage over streambeci
0-5�
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = inax points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
(deepl) embedded = 0; loose stnicture - max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
(no evidence u 0; common, numerous types a max points)
1
0-4
0-4
Z
Presence of amphibians
0-4
no evidence- 0; emmnion, numerous types max points)
Presence of fish
0.4
a
p
2l
0_4
0-4
L
j
�`
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types - max points)
--
_ Evidence of wildlife use23 _
0-5
0 6
t7 _ c
(no evidence - 0; abundant evidence = mat points)
t{
109
Total Points Possible
100
100
�OJ
TOTAL SCORE (also enter tilt first
Paige)
3
i These characteristics are not assessed tit coastal streams

JSC-NWW-17i
NC ❑WQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: -'
Project/Site, ' s
Latitude: ,
Evacuator:
County:
Longitude: 7'
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 1
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other ff
Ephemeralperennial Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology {Subtotal = }
Absent Weak
Moderate
2
Strong
3
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0 1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1_-
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
"1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or bcnchcs
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
B. Headcuts
0
%1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0/
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions_ in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ]
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
0
1F
2
2
3
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
1.5
t
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris _
0
`0 5
!' 1 .
1.5_
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
"1.5 _-
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
_ No = 0
Yes = 3
U. 151010gy (Subtotal =
18, Fibrous roots in streambed
3
'
1
0
19, Rooted upland m plants in streabed
_
3 ,
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
/0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
�
0
1
?
3
2.2. Fish
0
0.5 ' �
1
1.5
23, Crayfish
0
0
0.5
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
1
1.5
25. Algae
5•'
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0-75; QBL= 1,5=-0ther = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 or manual.
Notes:
Sketch-.

JSC-NWW-17i
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: ` 2 0 ProjecbrSite:
Evaluator. � .1&2M County: crcw�
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one)
Stream is at least intermittent
ifz 19 or P, rennial ifa 30" 22, Ephemeral termittent Perennial
A�--r
Latitude: 3r 11 _;-4 2
Longitude: - T7. o ©-
Other
e.g. Quad Name: Ntw
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak Moderate
Strong
18* Continuity of channel bed and bank
0`'
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
L,--
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
rip le -pool sequence
0
1
2,
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1,
2
3
5. Activefrelictfloodplain
__0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
22
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5" --�
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
too = 0
Yes = 3
anniciai ancnes are not ratea; see discussions>in manual
R_ Hvdrolonv iSuhtntal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
.._2
3
14. Leaf litter
.1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0...
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
` 0
--0.5 ," '
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 _.Yes
= 3
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = ]
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1-'
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
air
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
p
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
;t7
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
__0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
10.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 9
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions � Site: S_�___ JSC-NWW-17i
Width: �
Height: �Ao Q;
Depth water:�� Notes
Natural line impressed on bank
Shelving
Changes in character of soil
Destruction of terrestrial vegetation
I/
y
"`
Presence of litter and debris
Wracking
Vegetation matted down, bent, or absent'
Sediment sorting
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away
Scour
Deposition
Multiple observed flow events
✓
Bed and banks
_...
Water staining
Change in plant community
Other:
�.,
_..........
4..

USACE AID# DWQ #
JSC-Nww-17i
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: %� E V-FC1KW 2. Evaluator's name: Dim/t t +w�
3. Date of evaluation: "-A /z,7' y 4. Time of evaluation: (2 Y
5. Name of stream: k""\0( c. �fu _ 6. River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: 10. County: 1 w vlyt .
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): �S 1 i �. Longitude (ex.-77.556611):
Method location determined (circle): Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
G (-D ;5,' S .~< � 4-AR V o m a � 3 G4 err x t+ h
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: 100 u �/os f /} s
rr
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: LE-% Residential
_% Forested
22. Bankfull width:__ 5 ^ 'f
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
_% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Cleared / Logged % Other
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): i
24. Channel slope down center of stream: VoViat (0 to 2%) ✓ Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
(from reverse): C4
,LE . 'r-h
Evaluator's Signature f— --- Dated 1} 2.0
This channel evaluation form is Wended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

JSC-Nww-17i
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
C.'HAl2At'T[:N15TI('S
�
E COREGION POINT RANdE
----- _ _ -
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
i SCORE,
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
5
� � �
`
i
(no flo\v or saturation 0, strong flrnv max paints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0- b
0- 5
0- 5
(extensive alteration - 0; no alteration max points)
i
R
_ Riparian rune
0- h
0-4
0-;
D
(no buffer - 0; contiguous, wide buffer .. max points)
}
( Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
r
(cmensive discharges - 0; no discharges ma% points)
I-
a
a
I Groundwater discharge
() _ ;
0-4
0-4
inn discharge 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. =max points)
Presence of adjacent floodplain
(no floodplain - 0: extensive tloodplain - max points)
x
7
F,ntrenchment / poodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
p"
(deeplti entrenched - 0; frequent flooding max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
ft t,
0-4
0
(no wetlands - 0; large adjacent wetlands max pones)
4
Channel sinuosity°
0-5
0-4
0-3
(extensive channelization 0; natural nwandet max points)
l()
Sediment input
0-5
11-4
1 0-4
(extensive deposition 0; little or no sediment max points)
11
- Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
, 0-5
�/ 1/y
(line, homogenous 0; large, diverse sizes max points)
1,
Evidence of channel incision or widening
(1- �
0-4
0.S
(deep)\ incised = 0; stable bed & banks max pointy)
1
Presence or major bank failures
0 _ ;
() - S
0_ s
?�
(severe erosion - 0; no erosion, stable banks max points)
paRnot
14
depth and densityon hangs
o-?
0-4
0-5
(no visible roots - D: dense roots throughout max points)
�
_ _.
1 S
w _... _._ _
Impact by agriculture. livestock, or timber production
(, -
() - d
-
(substantial impact 0. no evidence ax point,)
(substni
IG
Presence of riffle-poolfripple-pool complexes
0-3
1 0.5
U-(i
(no riffles;ripples or pools - 0: well -developed max paints)
_
E-+
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 6
0-6
H17
(little or no habitat ; 0: frequent, varied habitats max points)
1g
Canopy euverage over streambed
0-5
0•5
0-5
x
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy near points)
19
Substrate embedctedness
NA*
0. 4
0. 4
(deeply embedded - 0: loose structure max)
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0- 5
tl - 5
b
..l)
(no evidence - 0; common, numerous types - max points)
U
21
Presence offam amphibians
p
()- )
0-4
0-4
O
(no evidence 0; connuoin, numerous tNpcs max points)
—
C
,7
Presence of fish
()
0
0-4
/
r
(no evidence 0; common, nV111er0us t\ pe, Ilea." prints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use !
-
0
0 5
(no evidence 0; abundant evidence - nrlx points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
loo
I JU
TOTAL SCORE. (tilso enter on first pagc)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2

JSC-NWW-18i 2-2 2% z-1
g"
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 4Sr 2-5
Date: v - T) ProjecUSite: -' a- ,� r Latitude:
Evaluator. ,����\ _ j County:
tY• Longitude:
G ✓uvt: -
Total Points: Stream Dete ation (circle one) Other A
Stream iperen least intermittent -tom
if z 19 or perennial if 30* � D Epheme Inter ittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_ r: 7
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
,
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thaMeg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relictfloodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1~
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
' _ 0_5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
I
No
= 0 >
Yes
= 3
• , acG ua.ua�lu a m �nnn ua�
B. H drolo Subtotal = 1
'�
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2`
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
U
12
3
14. Leaf litter
v _ ..
1
5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
D .,
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
9 p•
(�
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
: Yes =
C. Biolo Subtotal = t y
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3-
2
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
-3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
7- _
2
3
22. Fish
- 0
5
�j>
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.51
1.5
24. Amphibians
Q
0.5
.1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
7
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See
p. 35 of manual.
Sketch: �a n nz l v. 1 ,
(��S
�� .i
Vti
i c` ��-• r' '�� �► c

JSC-NWW-18i
Characteristics Considered When Making an QHWM Determination
Dimensions
-� Site:
Width: Z-- m -- --
Height: — L 4 aQ; �-
Depth water: z - (,, r. c Notes
Natural line impressed c
SI
Changes in character
Destruction of terrestrial veg
Presence of litter and
W1
Vegetation matted down, bent, or
Sediment
Leaf litter disturbed or washe
Del
Multiple observed flow
Bed any
Water
Change in plant con

USACE AID#.
DWQ#
JSC-Nww-18i
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name:__ % k/ &Ir rn 2. Evaluator's name: - I.
3. Date of evaluation ' /2a 20 4. Time of evaluation: 12. =
5. Name of stream:____ ,w ,r�lG .,, ` (.1 f C 6. River basin: i eyJtr-
7. Approximate drainage area:
9. Length of reach evaluated:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
8. Stream order: i
10. County: (Ir;- , '^-
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): O(p Longitude (ex.-77.55661 1):
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location) .,,,,...
14. Proposed channel work (if any): '
15. Recent weather conditions: .' W (I ffer,
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 20 % Residential (00 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other t )
22. Bankfull width:
2^ �-.
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ;;;,-
--flat (0 to 2%)
25. Channel sinuosity: _-I�traight _',Occasional bends
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):__ ..... .. 1— .._.
`�entle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
_Frequent meander _Very sinuous Brkided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
�p
Total S ore (from reverse):, Z Comments:,. 0
1,���?rla�✓' ', ::-.I/''C c.�..C_._. �� �•.� ,• .. /� ✓ �'..-fir 14,i
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used onlyas a guide to assist landowners andenvironmental
n f on . '
' — _ _
g environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

ASS
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT'WORKSHEET JSc-Nww-18i
EC OREGION POINT
RANGE -
SCC)1t1?
CHARACTERISTICS
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
_
-- Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream u
(no flow or saturation 0; strong flow • max points)
—
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0- 5
(extensive alteration - 0; nu alteralion - max quints)
3
T Riparinn zone
0-6
0.4
1) -
(no buffer _ 0; contiguous, wide buffer - mat lwints)
4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0 5
0. 4
0-4
r
(extensive discharges - 0; no discharges - max points)
Uroundwater discharge
t
{no discharge - 0: springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. max lxiints)
kr
Presence of adjacent floodptain
0-
()- 1
03--`
(no floodplain = 0: extensive floodplam = max points)
_.-
_
Entrenchment / tloodptain access
a7
0_
0_
0
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding - max points?
—_...
0 4
0 - _
_
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0 ' b
(no Ntietlauds -- 0; large adjacent wetlands - max points)
.
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0. 3
(extensive channelization 0; natural nicander max paints)
0-5
0-4
0-4
10
Sediment input
(extensive deposition 0; little or no wdiment max points)
l I
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
0-5
NA*
0-4
(fine, homogenous 0; large, diverse sizes -- max points)
() _ i
_
I ,
_-
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-4
0-5
(deep!). incised, 0; stable bed & banks = max points)u
F.
13
__.
- Presence of major bank failures
0-3
0- S
0-5
".
a
(severe erosion 0: no erosion, stable banks- max points)
pa
14
Ct - 3
0
ll - !
0 -
1' '
Root depth and density on hanks
H(no
visible roots - 0; dense roots throughout max points)
j 5
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 -
tr - a
{)
(substantial impact -0; no evidence - max points)
_ _
—(substantial Presence of riffle-poollripple-pool complexes
—
, .
16
0-3
0-5
0-6
(no riflleVripples or pools = 0. well-dt;veloped - niax points)
_
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
!~
0-6
H17
(little or no habitat - 0; frequent, varied habitats • max points)
, _ f
_ -
R
0. 5
d1
Canopy coverage over sfream bed
0-5
{) . 5
x
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy ._ max points)
NA*
0-4—
19
Substrate embeddedness
0-4
, A
(deepl) embedded = 0; louse structure < max)
_
0-5
0.5 �
, 0
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
(I _ 4
`
(no evidence 0: common, numerous t>_pcs = Max points)
_- -
1_
Presence of amphibians -
0-4
0-4
0-4
p
(no evidence - 0. common, numerous types max points)
22
Presence of fish
0. 1
0.4
0 1
0
(no eti idence 0-,eunimun, numerous types .- may punts)
23 Fvidence of wildlife use 0 0 0_ 5 0_ S
(no evidence - 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Tntal Points Possible 100 100 100
,w
TOTAL SCORE, (also c tiler can first Page;)
Z
s 'I hose characterwics are not assessed in coastal streams

ire JSC-NWW-20i
NC DWQ Strewn Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: �� 2a Project/Site:
Evaluator: Axzo,&A County: Cl'kcie.4/
Total Points: 1 Stream Determination (circle one)
Stream is at least intermittent 22,rj I Ephemeral I
if termittnt Perennial
z 19 or perennial if 30" �.
c-7 6 C_ l
Latitude:
Longitude: 77 atoT o f
Other New 6'e'- /
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = `L }
Absent
0
Weak
1
1
Moderate
2
2
Strong
3
3
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalvvveg
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
P
2
3
5. Acbvefrelict floodplain
®
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
139
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
aiuuciai uitcnes are noz raiea: see aiscusstons to manuat B. Hvdrolociv (Subtotal = !If 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3 "
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
_1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
U. t91010aV fZ!i11DT0Ta1 = 1 G 1 -
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
C33
3
2
2
1
1
0
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3„
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
1.5
Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: SIR S Sd ea WA
�. �L�
y
��,dt� 6Aa�µ,S2f
ley �'

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions
Width:
____j____
_I ......... _.wt ___..._...
Height:
MMMm _ `(
Depth water: ( !
Natural line impressed on bank
Shelving
in character of soil i
of terrestrial vegetation i
ence of litter and debris '
Wracking I 1
E E E
E
d down, bent, or absent
E
turbed or washed away
Scour I
Deposition I
i
le observed flow events
___.-.....___...._.... _______.___._..__._....... .................... E._...._...__._ __.____...._. ._..._.......__..__._._.............__.....e............m.........._.___._...._._._..._..........__._______.______.__._.___.__._..._.....e........._.._w.,.._.__....__.......___.._____..__._.__..._.._._._....__
E
Bed and banks
_._.i
.._ _ __ __ __ ___ _ _ _ _ � _ _ - _ _ _- _- ___..._.__.. - _ - __......_..._._...
nge in plant communityE
Other: ; E
Chan
Destruction
Pres
Vegetation matte
Sediment sorting
Leaf litter dis
Multip
Water staining
Cha
Site: G, 5 c 1
N otes
JSC-NWW-20i

USACE AID#
DWQ#
JSC-Nww-20i
Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
G5,C
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Cv+A u t 0e(l 6,c,-.✓ 2. Evaluator's name: o'owl
3. Date of evaluation: �' 'f 7 /7 p 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: ` '_ All' Tn � ! ird i�,t 6. River basin: Devi C'
7. Approximate drainage area: 4 1 a wl 8. Stream order: (�
1
9. Length of reach evaluated: 5�� 10. County: Cruye„✓
11. Site coordinates (if known): Lprefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): L —1 1 Longitude (ex.—77.556611): ` �7- 060 7 0'.
Method location determined (circle): G Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
Idd- k v1 "t f_ (ow +�� w4�t ,
14. Proposed channel work (if any):—( f for, � %r ." G 1 t s 4 of t +^� .ry ^U• ^G# fW f
15. Recent weather conditions: cO k a ))t t.l
16. Site conditions at time of visit: '�— V V, XA `, I 1. J CtA M
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 9 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 76 % Residential _% Commercial 0% Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other (
22. Bankfull width: f—�,— 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down cent of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there arc obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):"© Comments:
Evaluator's Signature (J" Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners a d en ironmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

JSc-Nww-20i
STREAM QUAL]TV ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
IrCO) RFC
? CHARACTERISTICS
S Coastal
I Presence or flow/ persistent ponlsin stream 0-5
(no flow or saturation 0, su•ong flow max points)
7 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6
(extensive alteration 0, no alteration max pointsi
Riparian cone 0 - fi
(no buffer U; contiguous, Hide buffer - max points)
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0 5
(extensive discharges - 0; no discharges max points)
ION POINT RANGE
Piedmont Mountain
0-a (►-i
0-5 11.5
0-a
0-a
a s Groundwater discharge 0- 3 0-4
(no discharge 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. max perints)
Presence of adjacent lloodplain 0-4 0
(no f1oodplain - 0: extensive ffoodpl;tin - max points)
a 7 Entrenchment / lloodplain access 0-5 ()
(deeply entrenched - 0; frequent flooding max paints) _
8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0 6 0-4
tZ
H
rn
r
s
x
(rto wetlands 0: large ad}ascot wetlands rnax pottns)
Channel sinuosity
0-5 0-4
(extensive channelization 0; natural meander max points)
10
;pediment input
0-5
0.4
(extensive deposition 0; little or no sediment tear poutts)
_
1 1
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
(tine, homogenous (; large, diverse sixes max points)
..—._
I,
... __ _....
E ��idencc of channel incision or widening
0 - ,
0-4
;deeply incised 0; stable bed & banks •rnax points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0. 5
0-5
(severe erosion 0; no erosion. stable banks max points)
—
_...—.._ —
........ ....... _e
14
Root depth and density on hanks
0-3
() - -i
(no risible roots 0. dense roots throughout max points)
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
(substantial impact 0. no evidence max points(
_
16
Presence of riffle-pool.+ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
(no rifllesoripples ar pools - 0. well -developed max points)
17
)habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
(little or no habitat 0; frequent, varied habitats max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streatnhed
O 5
0-5
(no shading vegetation _ 0; continuous canop} max points)
I
Substrate embeddcdness
NA*
() - 4
(deeply embedded = 0: loose structure max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see (rage 4)
0 -4
(no evidence 0; common. numerous t. pes - inax paints)
U 21 Presence of amphibians 0- t 0-4
p (no evidence 0; common. numerous types max points) I
C Presence of fish 0 .( 0-4
(nU eVidCttCl' tes max points) 1
Evidence Ofwildlife use
,3 0 t, 0 5
(no credence 0; abundant evidence mat points(
Total Points Possible 100 l 100
TOTAL SCORE (also ceder on first page) l
• TTtese characteristics are nett assessed its coastal streams.
SC'ORi;^
l
0-4
0-4
Z
0 '
d
0-?
�
n-2
0-3
v - a
0-5
IQ ,
0-5
1
0-5
0-6 p
0-6 �.
0-5
0-4
,
0-a
�
0-5
3
100 I ( 0

JSC-NWW-20i
g-s 91
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: U 1,� 2,0
Project[Site: �Q� yt � � C er
Latitude: 3 3 !?j
Evaluator: d) �- ✓r5p„ Ors
County: �� �J�✓
Longitude: 77 %076- j
Total Points:
ream is least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
perennial
ii>_ 9 9 or perenr:ia! if � 30*
if
Ephemeral Ir}term lt'tent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = = }
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
3
rt
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
(
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
ti Q
_- 0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
�No = 0 -
Yes = 3
artinciai ditches are not rated; see aiscussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = }
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
'3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
�
2
3
14. Leaf litter
11.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
,0
0.5
1
'i .5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es
C. Biology (Subtotal = j
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
fi 3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
Ca
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
23. Crayfish
.•
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
tT
0.5
1
'C
25. Algae
LO
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions 704
0
Width:
._. ___....._..._.�._�e._._._.... �ro
Height_ ___ _ Q.GZ �k0 aQ
Depth water: U 0 0 o O
Natural line impressed on bank
Shelving
Changes in character of soil
Destruction of terrestrial vegetation
Presence of litter and debris
Wrnr_kinn
Vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
Sediment sortina
Leaf litter disturbed or washed away
Multiple observed flow events
Rand nnrd hanks
Water staining
Change in plant community
Other:
Site:i $
Notes
JSC-NWW-20i

USACE AID#
DWQ #,
JSC-Nww-20i
Site # (indicate on attached map)
19
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: C, 4 ( � de �✓
('- .✓
3. Date of evaluation: Z0
5. Name of stream: S460 �+7N
7. Approximate drainage area:
2. Evaluator's name: L e w 1c ,,' _ Pr�/_l.- ; r✓
4. Time of evaluation: 12 �5
6. River basin: Alegi l�
8. Stream order: 0
9. Length of reach evaluated: S� 1 10. County: Cr�QQV-A,
11. Site coordinates (if known): [ g
prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 5, � 17 ��0 1 Longitude (ex.-77.556611): 21- 0607*
Method location determined (circle): 2; Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIs Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Vf #0V f ,
15. Recent weather conditions: 0 i _ l Ate. W f i C'd c9'�,
16. Site conditions at time of visit: SL -Dr-"
F
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES i9If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: Residential _% Commercial"/o Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other (
/ t
22. Bankfull width: !Z 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ✓lat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:_ J i(4 4.,J 04 4 ' 4�v Of&Z e e—
R7 a
Evaluator's Signature /2,L,. -V J Date_ &�y�2�
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUAL]TV ASSESSMENT WORKSHVET JSc-Nww-20i
CHARACTERISTICS 5 I t`OREGION POINT RANGE
— _ _
C'oastal Yiedmonl M- oun- tain--
Presence or now persistent pools in stream
1 (no flow or saturation 0; strong flow max points) 0 = � {) "I t) - 5
.
Evidence of past human alteration
0{> -
(extensive alteration 0no alteration max paints) fi
: {) -
Riparian zone 0- h 0-4 (1- 5
(no buffer - U; contiguous wide buffer - max points)
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
4t)- j 0-4 0-4
(extensive discharges - 0; no discharges - max points)
a 5 Groundwater discharge _ 0 _ , U - 0-4
U {no discharge 0: springs, seeps, %%etlands. etc. max paints)
Presence of adjacent flood lain
t5 j P 0-4 0-4 0-2
(no floodplain - 0; extensive floodplain - max points)
a7 Entrenchment / [londplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2
(deep)) entrenched 0; frequent floodingmax points)
8 resence of adjacent wetlands _ 0 4 U
(no %vetlands 0; large adjacent wetlands max points)
q Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0- 3
(extensive channelization 0; natural meander max points)
10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4
(extensive deposition 0; little or no sedmieni max paints) _ - -
1 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate N A * U - 1 0 -
(nine, homogenous 0; large. diverse sizes max points) }
.Evidence of channel incision or widening
12 (dccph incised a 0; stable bed & banks - max points)
Presence of major flank failures 0-5 0-5 1) - i
a I' (severe erosion 0: no erosion. stable banks max points) _
0 lion( depth and densit, on banks
� I.3 tt--J 0-?
(no visible roots 0; dense roots throughout max points)
Impact by agriculture, livestock. or timber production
l g (substantial impact 0; no evidence max points) 0-5 0-4 0-5
I {� Presence of riffle-pooliripple-pool complexes -� 0-3 0 - 5 0-6
(no riffles -ripples or pools U: well -developed max points) ,
E� habitat complexity
17 0-6 0-6 0-6
E., (little or no habitat - 0; frequent, vaned habitats max points)
Q
IR Canopy coverage over streambed
U-} 0.5 U-i
x (no shading vegetation _ 0; continuous canop} max points) _
I y Substrate embeddedness* 0-4 0-4
i (deeph embedded ° 0; loose structure max) _
20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page a) n - a 0. i 0 - 5
(no evidence 0; common. numerous types max points)
Presence of am hibians
L7 ?1 p ()• ! 0-4 0-4
O (no evidence = 0; common. numerous types max points) _
Presence of fish - W4 0 4 — 0 4 0- 1
�-+ (nu ev id4ncc U, common, numerous tN pes max points)
— Evidence of wildlife use 0 b tl ? —` 0 5
` (no evidence .. 0; abundant evidence - max paints)
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter (in first page)
* these characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
SCORE:
0
3
2
3
-
WA
2

3)d
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region JSC-WI, W2
Project/Site: x! 4( �M, "a t - City/County: /�% T�1 Sampling Date: bhhb
it
Applicant/Owner: fr,°_'____ State: ��. Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Ato^ Section, Township, Range: ;P
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): � d "_ Local relief (concave, convex, none): [ t CpA;�V�•-r-.1 Slope (%): 4Z-or/
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): ��II�' Lat: 3�i ` �3 2 Long: DO `��� + Datum:��6
Soil Map Unit Name: _ 4'r - A?41'�//� rl."r _r- Gop.+l Tj p ,� �` �
y NWI classification: 1.m �
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
FHydr7ophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes —�Y--
Yes Y '
Yes
Remarks: �&5)� � 10
OW
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
No Is the Sampled Area
No within a Wetland? Yes No
No
Prima-, Indicators 'minimum of one is required-. check all that a- r1,
Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
rn High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
�! Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
® Water Marks (61) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
® Drift Deposits (133) ❑_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
a Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
a Iron Deposits (135) Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137).
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Seconda ; Indicators ,minimum ftwo required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Drainage Patterns (610)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
19 Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): rJ
Water Table Present? Yes %/ No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):, Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
JSC-WI, w2
Sampling Point: S%'J % d
Absolute Dominant Indicator
(Plot size: 39
Tree,
% Cover Species? Status
'Stratum
1. ^ lvf✓ Voe
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
_
q
!� = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: l , )
1. Y /,P, r h
_ i ,
2. J_, ,� YAM &
3.
c
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
�( Vy = Total Cover
50% of total cover: lU 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
g. r
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cove: 20% of total cover:
Wood Vine Stratum Plot size: 7r ) , �%
1. Ui tad 11°l !/1( Yt7 1 F1 ti ' s+ --- -+ML
-
2.
3.
4.
5.
_ = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 21,
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: J (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: J (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ? _ (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
C � - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_J2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

JSC-WI, w2
SOIL Sampling Point: 6-
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix _ _ _ Redox Features
_inches_ _ _._Color ;moist; % Color imoist]_ % Type' Loc' Texture Re -arks
0cw, r
!ZA---vim: _,4LP_.16✓ t- A
'Type: C=Concentration, D_=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Linirn:r, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1:1 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_E1
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
0
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
E]
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) u Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
0
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
T_E]
Depleted Matrix (F3) u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (176) (MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
D
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
D
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _E]
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
D Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes / No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

5W7--r Svc!
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic rand Gulf Coastal Plain Region JSC-WI, W2
Project/Site: �i _ i City/County:.)A' /� !!� Sampling Date:
+r
Applicant/Owner: !M State: y _ Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):! ` Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): '1164 �^ . Local relief �c7oncave, convex, none): i Slope
Subregion (LRR or MI-Pik):S3h Lat: 3�' 2 S�j 2 Long: 77 0 Datum: We/ 5D®�1
Soil Map Unit Name: f. /U"/"Poe - %n/C 9-w. C_o _. NWI classification: I7�
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes —
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
No
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes '� No
Yes ✓ No
Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators.
Secondary Indicators minimu
Primary Indicators :_minimum of one is required; check all that a.;,.,)Iv) _ _
❑
Surface S cks (136)
❑
Surface Water (All)1❑-f
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
I
:sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑
High Water Table (A2)
I-1 Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑
Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑
Saturation W)
Hydrogen Sulfide hr_"nr iC I
❑
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized-•Rri zospheres along Living Roots (C3)
II
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
-'resence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (63)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
II
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
a
Algal Mat or Crust (B :
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
II
Geomorphic Position (D2)
II
Iron De;;i3sits-(85)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
nundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes NoPe
(includes ca: illa,, frin.:e _
Describe Recorded Dat
a (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

JSC-WI, w2
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: -/ I i
5
IVY
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: % )
y
% Cover S ecies? Status
Number of Dominant Species )�
1. i�'tvU m� .fie
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: _ (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ? _ _ (A/B)
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
% Cover of: Multiply by:
8
__Total
Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% OfMal cover:
YS 20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10 7�` )
FAC species x 3 =
1 ` lir,4l)�tAt
►,)
FACU species x 4 =
I.
23. t ` � �t IA C ' ��
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6• -
_/1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
�/ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
= Total Cover
_ 3 -Prevalence Index is _<3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover: —9 20% of total cover:
_
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1.
t3e present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
r'
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10—
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11. �r
height.
12.
"
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover
f
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size-
4
2.FM
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover: "J
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

JSc-WI, w2
SOIL Sampling Point: s>17-47 v
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
(inches,
Color moist %
lb
Redox Features
Color _moist_ % Type' Loc' Texture
10
Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Dei_,letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
2Location: PL=Pore Lininn M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
T❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
S)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)-0
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR
LJ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_E1 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
o
u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils ils (F20)
❑
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)❑I
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes YI No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjecUSite: ) 4 L f1t f --ee City/County::.1_' loll bwr - 1' (tV:''F✓_ Sampling Date:
ApplicantlOwner. _. u o � W L`V r✓ _ State: +� G Sampling Point: -, L 26Q (j.1,er
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: - wk -S 41
Landfonn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): _ i 01 r ._� Local relief (concave, convex, none): ...__-_ . w_a Slope (°k): O
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): _ I f 3a Lot: S_ (l { 3 �L� Long: \ 7 1 • �G" _....''�4 _ _- Datum:
// 1
Sal Map Unit Name: Wt - U ✓►.®� { lirr t W Q. 7 ate v 1) C( Wt NWI classification:
Are climatic ! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for is time of year? Yes No �_ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation /V ,Soil W.1 , or Hydrologysignificantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes / No
Are Vegetation IV, Soil N , or Hydrology V naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Fwith
the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
in a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks: -
41')�aA, IV4.) "
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Prim Indicat2rs j!ninimum cf one
is rev ed,.,O eck all ti-at ::aolyj
_Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
i/ h Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Suffide Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (63)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
___Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
41 FAC-Neutral Test (135)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
—Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
- t
f
Surface Water Present? Yes
No __ Depth (inches): I
Water Table Present? Yes
No -Depth (inches):
�No
Saturation Present? Yes
Depth (inches):_ _- ._
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 1i No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
®.,- ADsoute uomnam mnicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ✓ ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2. j
3. a
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
SaDlina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: P � 1
o.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
y r
1. L 7INI* /4;A
pafIitt4ro,l�.4
C�l� l� LPL,
2. :3 N
v
3. r jL fir, (y1jrc�-
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
00 Total Cover
T
50%ortotalcover:
20% of total cover: �7
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 0 `✓ )
1.
s'
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Sampling Point: (Oef 268
Dominance Testviorksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: b (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 = _^...._..
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A=
- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -AII herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tal1.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Pant: G ra C Z 158 l t.i'-
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or conflrm the absence of Indicators.
Depth Matrix
dnches� _Color moist; %
6 _ Ll Jn _ R Z Z lbo
�=-� L- A .21)_ .L v
l q It ro YID 62 o
__.._.... Redox Features
Color cmoisti % Type Loc- Texture Remarks
L
S L-
o YAP z cl, _,' f�> K_
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
2Location: PL=Pare Linin
Indicators for Problematic Hydric
_ Histosol (Al) _
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T. U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Fpipedon (A2) _
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3) _
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) _
Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _
Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
I cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _
Mari (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _
Depleted Ochric (F11) (M LRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) x
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (85) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 1
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

JSC-wio
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
L A� r �.
ProjectlSite: L___.._ ^ 11 ^Qe�t City�County: ry �H/ �(a^►� F ai/+ A Sampling Date: 6 ^IZU
Applicent/Owner. ,, _'_.i 2 L 0?-W 6f-1 (� f
State: r Sampling Point: f� �- 2 0 8� 1
Investigator(s): (0^ —_ Section, Township, Range: 04/oV, (4,
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glr+ �- Local relief (concave, convex, none): ° � �'/ Slope (%). 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): l os Let: ? . �. a. Long:' IT OG . _ Datum: W 65 ` q
Sal Map Unit Name: Tr7 JY4d' e S .t �(w C S .•<v I V NWI classification:
Are climatic ! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for Ibis time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil �r Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes �No
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks: n _ c�L 14
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Yes —� No ✓ Is the Sampled Area
Yes No within a Wetland?
Yes No
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauireds check all that apply)
_ Surface Water (Al) _ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ High Water Table (A2) _ Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
_ Saturation (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils (C6)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Thiin Muck Surface (C7)
_•• Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
Water -Stained Leaves (89)
Yes No
Secondary Indicatorssminimum of two reaui
_ Surface Soil Cracks (56)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
— FAC-Neutral Test (DS)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No pth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No pdpth (inches): ^
Saturation Present? Yes No /Depth (inches): s Wetland Hydrology Present?
includesca;illar frin,ae:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Yes No Z
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
L A� r �.
ProjectlSite: L___.._ ^ 11 ^Qe�t City�County: ry �H/ �(a^►� F ai/+ A Sampling Date: 6 ^IZU
Applicent/Owner. ,, _'_.i 2 L �eu% 6f-1 (� f
State: r Sampling Point: f� �- 2 0 8� 1
Investigator(s): (0^ —_ Section, Township, Range: 04/oV, (4,
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glr+ �- Local relief (concave, convex, none): ° � �'/ Slope (%). 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): l os Let: ? . �. a. Long:' IT OG . _ Datum: W 65 ` q
Sal Map Unit Name: Tr7 JY4d' e S .t �(w C S .•<v I V NWI classification:
Are climatic ! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for Ibis time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil �r Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes �No
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks: n _ c�L 14
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Yes —� No ✓ Is the Sampled Area
Yes No within a Wetland?
Yes No
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauireds check all that apply)
_ Surface Water (Al) _ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ High Water Table (A2) _ Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
_ Saturation (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Water Marks (B1) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils (C6)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Thiin Muck Surface (C7)
_•• Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
Water -Stained Leaves (89)
Yes No
Secondary Indicatorssminimum of two reaui
_ Surface Soil Cracks (56)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
— FAC-Neutral Test (DS)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No pth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No pdpth (inches): ^
Saturation Present? Yes No /Depth (inches): s Wetland Hydrology Present?
includesca;illar frin,ae:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Yes No Z
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Jsc-wio
Sampling Point: 6f C -4a S all
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheets
Tree Stratum (Plot size: • _ )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species o- I
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant I
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
- t
5• --.--_ _
That Are OBILFACW, or FAC: (A!B)
6.
Prevalence Index workshl:7.
Total % Cover of: fly Mu�ltioly bu:
8.
OBL species S x 1 =
= Total Cover
FACW species 20 x 2 =
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FAC % 5 x 3 = 1 ��
Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
species
� g
1.
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species 27 x 5 = 13�
2. _,
�
�Q
Column
'� umn Totals: 3q (A) /-f (B)
3
4.
Prevalence Index = BJAc�-
5
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: /VjbAa►
6•
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 3,y
7•
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
500A of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
(X -LA
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be disturbed
1
present, unless or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:-.-
3. a N' -A o�w1+^ `.
d r%% : fd
i �p tjl • U rt)
C
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4. c Y 4r j tv r,c, ��
_ rC
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5. 'Tr
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8•
Herb -AII herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tell.
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover: b',g
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5•
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
WA of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
J'A-J ( 40-
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
depth needed to document the Indicator or
Depth Matrix Redox Features
tinches� Color imdst) % Color moist % Type OCL
d—/ d / 0 1 q .9- iZ
- zo
'T, p e: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Send Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Sampling Point: (' W c Z®a V/—
aosence of
Texture Remarks
L. 5
location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Pdyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (89) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (171) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ZDepleted Matrix (F3)
_Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
zDepleted
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matra (86)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C, 15313)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes )C No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

JSc-w7
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
1
Project/Site: / 4 _(" �� e * G,,e�r City/County: /Vert/%;,0,W Cl G^ / UetiSampling Date: " �
Applicant/Owner: Ct a i Net✓ State: 141L Sampling Point: r5}1'1` Q/ Y+
Investigator(s): „ ! Section, Township, Range: '70ww ., L1! F' `
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) �'`•" � _ cif Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): L 2-
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): T ^V7_? Lat:: 4_ Long: � 71. 06 d 7 ` )Datum:
Soil Map Unit Namee , , r�� `'i - �l^ V%R -✓ r?q �d `r�•y (. 4 NWI classification: / �p s
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No A_ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation rV , Soil _�, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation 4_1 Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X— No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ')( No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes )C No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Prima
Indicators :minimum of one is re :uired- check all that w fJP
Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (813)
p�
LN
High Water Table (A2)
Q Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3)
Q Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
®
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑
❑
Sediment Deposits (62)
Drift Deposits (133)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction
Q
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
El
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
W1 Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Secondar,__Indicators ,minimum of two re_,uiredl
Q Surface Soil Cracks (66)
® Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
® Drainage Patterns (610)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
II Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
hallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
0 Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water Present? Yes ►�. No Depth (inches): r�T
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes k No Depth (inches):" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V No
includes capillary fringe!
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jsc-w7
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific
names of plants.
Sampling Point:
3y
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _ _..., (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: __._(A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
= Total Cover
OBL species ....... _ _- x 1 = _
50%of�otal cover:
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
Sapling/Shrub Strat m (Plot size: h'i
)
1. �A Or .7iA
Q
FACU species x 4 =
,
-�-=
UPL species x 5 =
2
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8•
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
r-.0% of total cover:
20% of total cover: I
_
Herb Stratum (Plot �size~.. _ _ _ )
✓
�_
+ Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. d nh+lt(j f +h k
IP►� �►
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 730 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
/
5.
Hydrophytic r/
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations
below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jsc-w7
SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
_{,inches! Color imoist., % __Color (moist % Type' Loc` Texture
'T. ie: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
❑
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Li
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
0
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
D
El
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
D
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
.❑
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
" M-1. G F 10�� n— n T ..,
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
TEl
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
-0
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
TEI
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark
(MLRA 153B)
❑
Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
-❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
153C,153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 141 No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

JSc-w7
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: rtiL 5.2t r 6--ex \ City/County: I✓ QG/ �j��'�/ct 1/Pr✓ Sampling Date: G t'� Lz
a
Applicant/Owner: r . ,-'? 6 u/ ; or to/ State: AJ G cSampling Point: S �
Investigator(s): t TS1A�^') Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): __ __. Slope
Subregion (LRR or ML )
r L3�/ /t 7.
--— W� r Long: 71- a"dZ Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Rd fe
NWI classification: NA.
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical •forr this time of year? Yes No /� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
L/✓�
Are Vegetation W , Soil _ , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes _X_ No
Are Vegetation A✓ , Soil —A-1, or Hydrology V naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Yes No
Yes Na
Yes No
Primar_, Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Surface Water (Al)
ElAquatic Fauna (1313)
r❑
LJ
High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑
Water Marks (61)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres . •,i Living Roots (C3)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence : :-di-;ced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (63)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ ,_ nt Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
! Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q
Iron Deposits (135i
Other (Explain in Remarks)
a
Inund<:.ic-n Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
❑
':"rater -Stained Leaves (69)
Field Observations:
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Veget of d1 C, ,,.717e urfiace (68)
D;,i'rage Patterns (610)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
II Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
II Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
II Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water Present? Yes No rK Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
includes capillary fringe i
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
No A/
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

JSc-w7
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 / )
1. Inca ijz> '*fr
2. fiWj ice' "^ 2V !
3. V*4 i ilA ^ 1I►"�/rt r�
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
W = Total Cover
10 20% of total cover: IA-
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: _
WoodyVine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Sampling Point:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4' '" (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
JSC-w7
Sampling Point:
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
t' � 7
r . coo
to
or
Redox Features
Color Tnoist) % Type Loc,
Texture Remarks
Wo 76, = t.. >70Z
'TYPe: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils :
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
T❑
0 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_E1
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Tu�I
u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
El
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
� Very Shallow Dark Surface
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
(TF12)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
1__In
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
:'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

Jsc-w9
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: City/County: /�e-= / Sampling Date:
ApplicanVOwner, n i >% - = State. Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): r Section. Township, Range.
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none), r rc 510 e % :- i
p ( )
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: ✓ Long " J - Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: /J a 1 f`' NWI classification:
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation 5oil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
within a Wetland? Yes � No
Wetland hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
A>.X �d i ✓ {_ nor " '- r
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
�btigh Water Table (A2) —
/Saturation
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
(A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Water Marks (81) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (152) _
Presence of Reduced Iron iC4)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Recent Iron Reduction it Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Iron Deposits (65) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
— Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
Water -Stained Leaves (159)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes f No
Depth (inches):
T Surface Soil Cracks (136)
parsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Drainage Pattems (810)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
__ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
�FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (DB) (LRR T, U)
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well,
Remarks:
i
inspections), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names nfplants.
Sampling PoinL
jSii
Absolute DomInant Indicator Dominance Test worksheel:
Tree Stratum (Plot size' CWer spe status Number of Corninant Species
17,
o� -------_--_--------_
*. __----_--_-_------
» ------------- ------
»� ------------------
7� 8
Total __------_-__------
_ ~Tma|oov*, /-
oomcxtoto/cvvec zommtote /cover:
Sai)ling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:)
z. --�--_�----__---__
- 4.
5. o. -_---_------__---_
s. -----__-----'----_�
r. ---__--------__--_
a. --___---_--------_'
=Tmm|oov�,
| 50»mtm"/*wvec_oomcrfuma/cover:
_____
Total Number ofDominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent ofDominant Species
That Are osu.imrwz�
Prevalence Index womsheat:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
osILepecivo
x1~_________
F*cwop,^i°o
xz~_________
FxC,p*v/es
xo=_________
FACuopvci"n _------_�
x^=---------
upLspecies
xn~________
Prevalence Index =i=
xyumvhyl/eVegetation indicators:
_1 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetaticn
z Dominance Test |v>5mm
o Prevalence Index |o:5x.o
nnu°mmnc Hydmp»yticVegetation' (sxp|mm)
(Plot size: ) -
^~ �
'indicators of hydric soil ard wetland hydrology must
| '� -------�r---
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
L Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
_
3. ----__ ----_-'-_--'
4.
e.
r, _____--------__-_
n.
o� -_-----_-_-_---_
10.
11------ ----------
50% of -total cover
~Tmm|�°vn
��-_20% of total cover:
_---
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ' )
u.
| ' ------------------�
00%mtotal cover:list morptri adaptations
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, sin. (T.6cm) o,
more mdiameter atbreast height (ooiregardless m
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, exc�umnovines, less
than oin. ooxand greater than s.euft(1 m)mn.
Herb - All herbaceous (nuw+v000y) plants, regardless
msize, and woody plants less than x.uufit ton
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.zon/n
wydmphytic
Vegetation
pwmm? nesNo
uuArmy Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plainnegion-vorsionuo

Jsc-w9
wig ramp ng roEnE:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to docurrd6 tag lndlcator or confirm the absence of indicators.)•
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc- Texture Remarks
7-1
'Type, C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix,
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all Li unless otherwise noted,)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al) _
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon ii _
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
— Black Histic (A3) _
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
— Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presenee (AS) (LRR Ii _
Redox. Depressions (FS)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _
Depleted Ochric (Fi 1) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (Al6) MMLRA 150A) _
Umbic Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S) _
Delta Ochric (1717) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _
Piedmont Flcodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (36) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (37) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

Jsc-w9
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
PrajecUSite: 2- r 5a ie ` r F CitylCounty: ` - Sampling Date:
ApplicanVOwner: L/ : gl State: Sampling Point: r �'
Investigator(sy Section, Township, Range: I_ i
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc) 1r" f!a r�i Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope {%}
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): / % Lat: % 5 % / Long ' ^ ' Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: <- NWl classification:
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this lime of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ' " No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ! No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is re wired" check all that apply)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2) _
Mari Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01)
Water Marks (61) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (63) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Algal Mat or Crust (64) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Iron Deposits (BS)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
Water -Stained. Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (CB)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Saturation Present? Yes No . Depth (inches): Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections),
Remarks:
No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) °/6 CoverSpecies? §Ialus
2.
3.
Jsc-w9
Sampling Point:
Dominance Test worksheets
Number of Dominant Species '
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
4. Percent of Dominant Species
5 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
r,
50% or total cover:
20% of total cover:
Saalinu/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6,
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
,
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7,
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: --
20°% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: -
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
(B)
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multipiy by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAG species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = BfA =
Hydrophytic Vegetation lndleators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling[Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydruphytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jsc-w9
SOIL
Sampling Point
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) "/o
Color (moist) % TYpe Loc`
Texture Remarks
Type C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric 5atl53:
Hislosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ _ Thin Dark Surface (SS) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (LRR 0)
_ Reduced Verlic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (176)
(MLRA 1538)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (FS)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ MaTI (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Ail)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
! Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Veldt (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Flcodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (36)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Sols (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (37) (LRR P, S, T, U)
`.
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastai Plain Region —Version 2.0

JsC-w3
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjectlSite: _ _ �� ! r r City/County: -L)1 Li `Yt/1�1t% Sampling Date: � P
Applicant/Owner: !r 4vr ''.':' State: S mpling Point: s)'/ii�il�i -
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Ou'�fj/�r
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 4,- � - o t s'' `.t�l. ec^',, Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): A2-
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Let: �s. 12-5-7 +7&0 Long: -7/-� 7' 0`2 ` / Datum: k,�f 9_t
Soil Map Unit Name: L ` �A-�-y/�13A✓ (.:x? P NWI classification: zro)l1wA$1' mG
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V11 No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes --� No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes t✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks: ) e c
M A ~� 5 �t
HYDROLOGY
s ch
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators I minimum of one is r
uired check all that a I
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ High Water Table (A2)
-,- Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
g Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Water Marks (B1)
%� Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(87)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No4— Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Ye
N D h "
_ Surface Sal Cracks (B6)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
OS Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
o eV,(rn es).
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): _2 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes ca ip Ilary_frnge)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ld/
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Jsc-w3
Sampling Point:
R
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: F' )
OA Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2• u'
,,�
ZV y
Total Number of Dominant
3. _
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8•
OBL species x 1 =
�!D = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
3P 20% of total cover: _
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum_ (Plat size: /%�y
)
FACU species x 4 =
2. YA fvut ,1Gi
ZIP�' -,==—
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3.
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5•
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6•
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
?•
12 - Dominance Test is >50%
8•
3 -Prevalence Index is 53.0'
P) = Total Cover
_
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% oft al cover:
3L 20% of total cover: e l
_
Herb Stratum (Plot size: iP )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. �}i�l���%%3 / tG3c?t�
tPL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. ' Nyt,' r r L' 1� �1D
1
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3.
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6•
%Vling[Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater then 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
- —
StQoftotal c`over:
20% of total cover: ?I'P
Woody 4ine Stratum (Plot size:
)
2.D
3.
4.
5•
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover
500A of total cover:
20% of total cover: _ f
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL
Jsc-w3
Sampling Point: Sm —i(95
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence
Depth
Matrix
pinches)
Color mast %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Tvne Loc'' Texture Remarks
� d �}
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De, letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sol
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
p� Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P. T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

JSC-w3
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site:._:r'rwS541f'9 _ CitylCounty: /_ 16, 134V Sampling Date: ` 2P
Applicant/Owner: _ _ _ ' " d5e" _.. State: /L ;pmpling Point:
Investigator(s):�« %^S•r/�/ Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Local relief (concave, convex, none): rv, Slope (%): L2
34 3S 12f79& c„ys
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: _ Long: �7%• 06 2 %9 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: �L' - 56;i;*iGoe,e - � NWI classification: /Y
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _V' No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ' No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X _
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
)�I Surface Water (Al) 1Li
❑ High Water Table (A2) u
Saturation (A3) 13
_ Water Marks (81) 1t.�Jf
Sediment Deposits (62) 1L�J
Drift Deposits (B3) tJ
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Mad Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Liv- ng.l cols (C3)
Presence of Reduced lrbn (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
a Algal Mat or Crust (134) Ll Thin Muck Surface (C7)
a Iron Deposits (65) Q Other (Explain in Remarks)
a Inundation Otis v to on Aerial Imagery (B7)
{� Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ofDepth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No A Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No —A Depth (inches):
(includes caoillary frinoe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well. aerial photos, previc
Remarks:
rII-I Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (98)
Drainage Patterns tBIO'i
Moss Trim Lines (816)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
El Crayfish Burrows (C8)
0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
II Geomorphic Position (D2)
0 Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IIX FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Q Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No K
inspections),
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Guff Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

JSC-w3
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot Size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1. J,� 3d ?t��`{ ems, ✓ , r s.(i17.I�t
� =
d ��
2. ,
3.
4.
5.
6.
7
8.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover. D 20% of total cover.
SaglinalShrub Stratum. (Plot size:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
5 % of total cover. 5) 20% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: " )
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
_0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
2. rr � f - -f�-�-
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. t 20% of total cover.
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Sampling Point: S v
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species,
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (AIB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of.
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_V 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SaplingiShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 It (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

JSc-w3
SOIL
Sampling Point:G`
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color moist %
R •;iox F :tunes
Color_imoist 1�6 Tvce Texture
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Lj Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
�] Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
H5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
n Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
HSandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S. T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric SoiW:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
__I 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
T
iTT---II� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_E]
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
D Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR O, P. T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C,15313)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

JSC-W4, W5, W6, W11
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjectlSite: l City/County: %YI N dp1py' // `1G/1 Sampling Date:
ApplicantlOwner. ®, X _ State: NE Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: w,✓fN�
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): ` y! Local relief (concave, convex, none): �/91/0� Slope (%): Z
yr—
Subregion (LRR or MLRA); 3 "` Lat: _ _35. /ZZ __ % Long: 77. 6V (`6 ! Datum: 01(-S ey
Soil Map Unit Name: iy P4 60,047 _ NWI classification: Ej�
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes -k!L No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes i✓ No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes �- No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
rrrPrimary Indicators (minimum of one is reouire
Surface Water (Al)
�r High Water Table (A2)
+Lf" Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (Bi)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Drift Deposits (133)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
a Iron Deposits (135)
a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
® Water -Stained Leaves (69)
Surface Water Present? Yes ✓ No
Water Table Present? Yes No
Saturation Present? Yes No
rincludes capillary fnnge,
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monit
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Yes / No
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
0 Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Drainage Patterns (610)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (132)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
0 Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Depth (inches): l'Z-l0
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes I No
photos.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Guff Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

JSC-W4, W5, W6, W 11
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
r
Tree Stratum
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant Indicator
Status
(Plot size:
_S_ oecieo?
1. _ r 1s,*
Y I'LT
2.
3. 1
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Total Cover
50% of t4tpl cover
`%� 20% of total cover.
5aplmo/Shrub Stratum Plot size. >)'� J
)
L
1. s'^
2."mot,N'
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
10�
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover. r Z
Herb (Ptot size
a
410
2.
3.
4,
5.
6,
7.
B.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total Er 20% of total cover. _
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: co
(
2.
3.
4.
Sampling Point: s)�Z-m
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
(A)
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: / P (A/B)
_Total Cover of.
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Rapid Test for Hydrophyfic Vegetation
_- Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height_
5 Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover. 5 20% of total cover. Z 1
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

JSC-W4, W5, W6, W11
SOIL
(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvce Loci
b -)
�'� � o %4 �t ► �� loin s/3 � G- n�1
All
Type:_C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS --Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (85)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (87) (LRR P, S, T, U)
trictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Sampling Point:5Wt,-14 JKG
Texture, Remarks
a+R�
--
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S. T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S. T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) T� Reduced Vertic (F18) (o
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) TTugt Piedmont Floodplain Soil
Depleted Matrix (173) u Anomalous Bright Loamy
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 15313)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) T❑-I Red Parent Material (TF2
Redox Depressions (F8) u Very Shallow Dark Surfa
Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remark
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophyt
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology mu
Delta Ocric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or p
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
u
ce
Hydric Soil Present? Yes t/ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

JSC-W4, W5, W6, W11
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: A,',` !� _. City/County: i" Sampling Date: �� 2P
Applicant/Owner: State: _MG- Sampling Point: Z'01
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: lov,✓1N�%'
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): s, Slope (°/6): 4 Z-
Subreion LRR or MLRA ,: - — —
�+ Lat: Jl,, 1 ZZb � � ,._.. Long:. - 7I � . Y_ _.._ _ W'0:rJqf
Soil Map Unit Name:.. � .. _ _ . ' �' �'�_ � /",r .._ e�<> .._ _......_ --- - _-- ._. _. NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) � /
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes V No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No
i Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
Remarks: -- --
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hvdrol4
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that aoolyl
II
Surface Soil Cracks (1361
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
Sp arselyr�ated Concave Surface (68)
High Water Table (A2)
Q
r❑�
1Q Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
❑
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
LJ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
Moss Trim Lines (1376)
Water Marks (61)
II Oxidized Rhizosphen,n Jl: ng Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
III--
Sediment Deposits (132)
II Presence of =?tiyr uced Iron (C4)
II
8
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
"'.:(:e:nt Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
II
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Q Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Ll Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑
Geomorphic Position (132)
L.1 Iron Deposits (B--
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
0
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inunc: [inn Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
0
FAC-Neutral Test (135)
❑, Water -Stained Leaves (139)
II
Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No l Depth (inches):
;includes capillary fringe}
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge. monitoring well, aerial photos
Kemarks:
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
previous inspections), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Guff Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

JSC-W4, W5, W6, W11
Sampling Point: wZL)l '
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
R
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3V � )
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
",U �r statusNumber of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2 �k2_ = Total Cover
50% of to$Ql cover,
20% of total cover �L
a lin /Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1. �`" �,� �• ,,
� }�-
.max
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
_ = Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: �. )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover.
20% of total cover.
woody ViLne Stratum (Plot size �-74 4` )
2.
3.
4.
5
�D = Total Cover Q
50% of total 20% of total cover l/
s: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of-
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
_� Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
- Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
,die present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
P esertt9
0
Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

JSC-W4, W5, W6, W11
SOIL
Sampling Point:314L d l
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist; % Color ooist) % Type' Loci Texture Remarks
P �Q& aW) I _ OAM
to 9 �" D v' C` 2P C M
ncentration, D=Der.+letion. RM=Reduced Matrix, MS --Masked Sand Grains.
`Location: PL=Pore Lining, =Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
0
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
0
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) E] Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) 71:1 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
III
(A8) (LRR
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
(F8)
Mari (F10) (LRR U) D Other (Explain in Remarks)
f]
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
0
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) 0 Reduced Vertic (1718) (MLRA 150A,150B)
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
10 Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
i Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): _- Hydric Soil Present?
Remarks:
Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

JSC-W28 (JSCW22 through JSC-W27, JSC-W42 through JSC-W46)
WE71 AND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Sampl,nq Da:e'
ApplicvgrOwnei +r j4'•% r.• Seale: 6arnp4ingPo1nl
Inwestpgal {'(sy n Section, Township. Range
Landforrin (h"Ilslape. tertwe, etc y ��{ _ . _ ._ .. Lra°arretief{canca+re.oan+rex"none) .,„ ,F+'�':.�'�'` $Ippie
Sabreg,cri (LRR or NLRA): Let l Long i/ ' / " Datum
soil Map unit Name Z1i � C �� � '� _ NWI dassAcelon: I`�`'1'+ 2
Are umalicI hyarologic oorl.wPons an the *Jeetyvlw: for ihr3 lime of year's Yes No (It no, explain in Remarks,)
Are Vegetation Sail s_ . or Hydrology __..__.._._ sigr"ifcanuy dislurbed7 Aro'Nrorrnsi Circumstances' presenl7 Yes --'fL N8
Are Vegetation _ _ . Soil or Hydrology ralurally prab'em3lic7 (II needed_ explain any answers ire Remarks l
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showir►g sampling point loiwatiraris, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vlegetatiorl Prosen17 Yes W Is the Sampled Ames
Hydrlc Sole Present? ye$ W-- No � within a Weiland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes / Wo
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hyd re logy Indinatnim-
econdary tndical4'$. Lm inirnutn of Iwo retru {edt
Primdry Indirsilo•s Immim,um G' cxie;s rcauired,
check all Ihg,(apptyy
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
SurlaCe 4V&erIAtJ
AcuallcFauna (13131
Sparse+p Vege'latedOopcave Surface (138)
_11-IFJirgh Water fiah1s, (Ar!
Mar, Deposits (815) it RR U)
Drs man- raltemm% ('610)
Saturanlio, (A3.
11ydiugen Sufhde CJdor (C1)
Mo59 : hrn L refs [616y
_ Water Marks K 6 1 ) _
Ck"d+7ed Rhi7aspheres along tiong Hools (C3)
_ o(y-5easor, VNaler Tab?e (C2)
Sedimeni Deposits (1921 _
Rresenee or Reduced Iron IC41
_ Crayfah BLurows K7a'
Drill DepM7vs (63)
Reze+a1 ran �edua!ion Pp Y deed $oils (QU)
! Seturglirn Vvble o-1 A�,-rjai Irnageryr (C9)
Algal' Mal or Crus'. td4} ,
Than Vt�ck uo rfarg {C7l
_ Gennlc,rvr•+L FuO ,ItwQ ID2)
Iran DoDosits I B 5 y —
Other (Enplain q Rernarks)
Shallow Aqurtard (173)
Inundabon Visible an Aerial Imagery lHl y
�/ FAC-NevRiP0 Test (D5l
Wale( -Startled LeaQQS (B91
_.-. 8priag-1L.m IFFINS (IDIB) (L IM T, tl)
Surra:e Water Present"? vv* No
L)epth (mchesi:
Water cable Present? Yes, No_
De;,tr (rncllesr
Salurallan Presenr Yes No
Depth (inclias)
Watiand Hydrology Prasent7 Yes No
(includes capillary Fringe)
Describe r3ecwce-d Date Wream gauge rnanitrsring "I, aerist pTiatos prf ,� 'a114. r: r.rr�:etr,�ns) I` avallalsle - -
VS Army Cpfps of Engirteers Afianlic and GI.01 Caalstiiif Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATiON (Four Stralta)— use scientifi> 'iarn44s of plants
S13MPIIDO PCH-1
AbScWte Darr!- ini I
Dom,naocin Tt,.,,k work0itpi:
Tree MIum yPlcl sae 0,
C., �j r 1�0 '? Jx�-
N u m b t - cl DO(ni n ki n t S p ; � u s,
I
Pie[ Are OBL, rAGW. ct FAC IA)
2.
Tval Number of Dominant
SpeniesAaraGs All SIF0181-
Penceni d Dominant Sper e s
That Pre 081- =AGW, of FAC ArR)
Proyalenro Indox worksfiiii&
Tcltall % Cover Df: Multiply by.
OUL SPeCiSS X I
Too I Ccwe r
505fo of letel ravel'
2105+] of lcirni romr,
FAC?d SpeC105 X 2
FAC swits X 3
FACLJ species x 4
2,
UPL sDedes X 5
3.
Column Totals (A) .B:
4
-v, Ion ce Index =EVA=
HVC111�P11,11C VEqOatlon ind!ca[ars:
I - Rijjid 1e,St 'z)r Hybophyfle Vegetaban
3 - PTE!vWer ,,e, ii&,{ i� 13 '
Tel i: I :w L!
50% ut lutial evve-i
20% uf Mal ewer,
Herh %,r@tqrn (PIO sjze:
Irw citur, of 1-yoric ,oi, a".1 rrellar 1 hyci dogy must
Inc- preser I -,j r c ss ffiVwtr- d o,
M;6nffinns nt Fnur Ver[Aintirin Mrafa-
firers - kioocy plantS, cxcli'd ing mines. 1 it*. (7.10 CM) or
3.
4,
mare in diameter at Dreast lhe,qhj CIDD- ). regardless of
height.
SapfingiShrub - Woody Tanis e)Lc --iing vines IL,,,
I h a ri = in, D 0 H and gr e At e: thin � 22 ft r I m) 1,0 1
-!er L[ PS herMteOUS lMrwtKwJy:� ;Aants, *gard. e5s
8.
of -size, a n d & oWy pl eini s Ws than 3.26 fl t Bill
1d,Wo
ady V no —All woody w nes greeter t' ii n 3 26 it n
11
— —
12
�139A -;,f t dr 1 1; Ovet
Woody Virie Straturn (Pior size
1
2
3
4
0% ot tot@ I cover.
Remarks tlf i�' ncnrphae�iCa: adnplations
= Total Covr<r
of total corer:
20% tf trial t&vtv
HVidrophylle
Vegetallan
Present?
res
US Army Corps of rig i nc-4! r-,
Allanloc and 3w I t.:cpstal C-lain Region - Version 2 0

SOIL
S irm .11 i i )� Point: pu7pl
Pirai'lle DescrIplicin: iDe 'crlho In the depth needul M wwunnent the lmdicatcr or confirm 1hp aihsol)cq? 01 ilidkalvr ,. i
y,hr he-, --rior trncgs! Lac'
c
TE-x;Ljrk- Rem n rl<M
_7ffe. C�--Conaeniration D=Deplelion, RNT=.4e0jwc Matrix. MS-=NIA5ped Sand Grains
F° =Por;- - inii m=kliv-ii-
Hydric $all Indcatorr. 14DOcable to A LRRs, uffless a4hureAst, noted.) Indic
P7uDk@,nai1r
H,51oso (Al)
PO"lue Eklow ';-Aact (-SO) [LRR S. T, U)
I I-ilb ck i A9) IL F F �)
I I isl - c- (:pi pe d on (A2)
Thin Dark Eirtace. >9) (i-IRR S, T, UI
2 cn, lou cK (A 10) 1 L R R, S'
5 3,,: k l4wi r c A3 p
L vemy NIL - k y N1 in e,-: -i wFl1 (LR'R 0:
Reduced Verlic ( 2 1. 11) , J! 0,u F.' L, A. 1 0,", 0)
I yz: roger 5.i tide A4 i
L oorny ni eynd w F2)
P4eUrr=1 Floodpr.:n --"Dl -"LINN P S T)
8r' c 0 L. z yu s A5)
Anomalous Uklhl 0am, a:: o-20)
:3cd�e. s (A61 I L R R P, T, J)
— R e dox Lark S re I r6)
IIALRA 153S)
6 cr i VLr:-ry FAnerel (AT) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Dcplftcl DBik Surface (F7)
Red PEirant Matela, (TF2)
MUck Presence (AO) [Utlk IIJ1
— Redca Depres-, ons IFS)
Very She4la* park rAjrfq-.e (T F1 2)
1 cm 'Air* (AR) (LRR P. T)
— Marl 117110) (LRR Uy
'�
01her (Looln In Remooks)
pelrle'ed RvWr. Drk Surf.. (Al I
DePleted Ochri;; i 11: (PALRA 151
Thick dark cA:j r1a cg (Al 2)
Iran U? r 9--1 n P Srra M Pps i r 121 (LRR 0. P, T)
'if, di cat cg s 0 tl)draph 91 ic , L �e aticn and
— CcEi st Pr Eiine R edox (Al 6) [M LRA 1 50A)
Ljrnbrc Surface 'FlZ) (LRR P, T. U)
wallaild hyd,-Oogy m%isl: t)e Dresent.
— SR n iti Mucky Phri e V (SI) (LRR 0. $)
cc R8 Dchi c f. F 17, (M L R A 1511
unie-,s N!Auibed cr n,oti srw�j ik,
— S j n oi Stayed Wriv (U)
RejUebd Vdrlic i - it) (MLRA ISQA. 1506)
Sant% Redox 65)
Redmanil Floodpip5in Soils iIF19; JMLRA 149A1
smppad Matrix JS6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils IIF70(MLRA 1149A, ISJC, 15311l
J'-a I k Surface (S i) [ L RR P, 5,
W Iclive Layer (if at)sorvoj):
Dw p I h - 1 nck c,;
HydrIC Sall Rresenl? Yes Na
U S Arrr y Carps of Engineers Alle OP an d G Ulf Coastal Naln Region- Ve r sim 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Projectrsite- . -44r[r r+r r, r:' . CIVICwnt fi � y�' r ` �" < Sa-Tipli"I ❑ate.
_._.�
Applic,antf0wner. `p _4 ,J`'} "' f.-.. ' stale � ;r`'. Sa.nplin3 Point
GeriiGri. Twrrrrphip. Range
l andfv'm 01111slope, terrace, etc k ` Locat rowl (concave, convex, riwef: :'� ✓e•^-r Slope 1%)
8ahrnoran (LptR or WtA): r' %r+ tot Long � +� � �:° �'� � f*� Dalurn-
SuiI&1ap IJoJ Narne _1►'1 - ` %r - r+ t� _ NWI rJasaricatiol
Are: imatic : hydrologic condrtmtn5 bn the site typical fur It* Urm of yeah Yes NCO III nc ex:plwr In Rernarks 1 y�
Are Vegelabonr . Soil . or Hydrology mignlficawltlydislurbed`? Are'Normae C-rcumsiances` presenl9 Yes f No
Are Vegelation Se11 or Hydrology raturally problematic) :10 needed explain sr.y answers itl R rtt9.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing _%amphng point locations„ transeets, important features, etc.
Hydropnylic Ve"tion Prosanl? Yes Na Is the Sampled Area
Hyrdric Skil IPreseal? Yes No vAtW a Wo"arrrl7 yes No
Welland H° fology Presert? Yes ND
Rr3rriarkt �
Pyl)Ror GGY
41i,'r,S'6� i't1 iitirtt'iti o�py IndiC3tLhv5; _ _,._.. ,_
PrG'hip:,i;..,.c-krr51rn9r5�rrlun,a{,canIsreaWired-r:tee.�s��llaata
- �r -';,r.' Wailer (A1 _
Agvatic9aunta (813)
_- -ii "r. Vial �-r Table (A2y �
M;5d Deaciiis (Bl5) (LRR Ul
_ .Serarwion (A3) _
Hydr<ac3�n ;Relfi to l7dt r l l )
Walet'Marks r B * i _�
Oxidized Rhozospheres along 1.iwino Rots (C3)
Sediment UeposiLs (B?) �
PresenLe of ReAwced Iron !C4)
— Drift Deposils (133) _
Re w I -on Rw JoVion it 7Aled S&ls (CB'
Algal Mal qr Cras' iU4) -
In1r1 "AuLk 5tirf6Ce (C71
_
lion Uerpcsits '35)
Dthcr rExplain in Rerra3rk5l
Irlunc*tioe Vgsible on Aerial imagery (E1)
Vowee !•;utned L28Ve$ (e9)
Field Observations-
q` @vu_re fired
SUrfare SoJ C.acka (W)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 1130i
drainage Palt2;n5 (1310p
Mass Trim Lines (r31$t
Dry-Seasan Wnler Table.;C2)
Crayfish Eli„rrCwS +.,C8t
Sauu10ion Vrsitre on. Aer ai Imagery (C9)
neormorphi, 1`99111cin (D2)
Shallow Aquilmd (D3)
FAC- Neutrat Tesl (D5)
$phagnum moss (Dd) (LRR T, Ul
Su;latevt l r'1e'e.ert)' Yee No r. Oeplh(irchas): -f.
VValer Sahle Yes _ _ No e", Depth (ZC )0l: 1
aaturailon Rresent r Yes No f Depith (irochas): 12 t Wiffiand Rydrologlr P'rresent? Yas
Describe Rec oided Data istrearn gauge. monitoring well, aerial
US Arrny Corps of Erigineera Allarft and GO Coa Ul Plait R+eglon - Versian 2A

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Lsc sc,erillF - na'7'es & PlFnts
Trt-,k STr;i wl dr$o! slip.
i
3.
4
5
S.
7
50,16 of trial cover
1
SavlinulSlrub Stratum IP'lal size. 1
1
2.
3.
d-
E.
7'
8.
WA of total dower
t
f}(,.rr°nan9 In:tl°,glrr
",: -04eI %�ecle$ A atus
®nrrdnanca Test vmrk,,hr:al:
tdumbe- cr Uc -,irani pcc,cs
t'hal Are OBL -ACV.'. rIr FAv tA)
_
m'Ok F, ryJnYh P., 01 I]cyn r, an. 1+
.S.ec es Acrvs•. �`.I :�C -31e-. r ;Fih
Thgl afv C Jt (IVEi
prnonc e Ic.J ix vK,rt,Oclof, --
-e5ta: 7f WIND IV W:
= Tcta l C ogre r
201A d tolal Cover
FA.C%'J ;per. es _ x 2 =
F.z'C 9rCciC; x 3
FACki species x d =
l.Pl ;neCies x5=
Cd.irnn Totals (A,) IBi
Total Corner
20% of trial Cover
HertrStralum (Pidsize: 2 t
_ Atli—
41. "
sc�rF,,
4-,
5-
6,
7.
9.
14.
11,
- 7,m,l --over
5>� or kac+ 1,�Vor
rOtel cover.
Woady'Ane Stratum (plot size.
1
z.
4.
= Tcta I Cover
50% elf total rover;
20% of tml cover:
Remarks (if cb,aerved, list morphological adaptations below)
preValen_e ndux
Hydraph yrtte Vo g malls n I nnlentors:
_ 1 - Rapgd "Nst `or Itydrophytic Vegctallon
2 - Dortllrmncr Tc;A is >5014
3 - Pre"Ien cv.. lmdt -x s :2 C `
_ Rrabltr ahc -­l,drophAic Vegetalirsr (Explain)
Indic�kcrs of hydrae %oil aid wetljnJ hwrtr 7„ muss
be Pre5er,l u• eS: Ci '.r:R>e^ C3" prbt5l:qr 1t1:
Dp.fllili[rns of Fmir Vor,ttalion Strhf i
TrO& - Wood-y F!hnl-, cvV _,ding vines. 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
rrrare °ra Giarniflei a; brtjs' .eight CDBH), regardless of
hmight.
Saplingi$hrub - Wacdy ,Orals. excluding vines. less
Than 3 in l')BFf r•-id graoier than 3 2$ ft ,i m) tail
Harb - Alt herb®eeous+non-wocdya plaits, regardless
of size. a-1d wuocy elanlsless Chan d C8 4 tall
Woody vine -All woody n,Les greater than ; 78 ft it
heigbt,
wyd-r,ptiylic
V otips ('It i o ri
Pivz�vr,l7 Yes No
US Army Corps ofr=pgkneers Adhrtticand Gulf rot:,"; .-:,is°rr,:le:,, y.ti,w r

S01 L Smmpiing Pant
Profit Descrlplion: (describe to the depth needed to document the (ridlcall or CUnflrm thn absence of Inrilcators,)
D9pth l Hedot Fea:::res
;inches) �Cdc�r.Lmd%t) OA Cola^ (mast'. °r YrD Lct Trxture� Rertiary
Type G'COIH:er, !I c , , -.I i ., [, -==::.air
r,., Yun>: M:S=MnsU!:1 Simi C-:rall
1.(r,'Ali ;)n r'L=axe l.rig %I=Mi,[rir.
Hydric Sell Irrcirczlarb tApul,ic.�bl to ali l unl@f,5 o1h43rwsD note_. irl
it :..; rA S f,?r Problematic Hyriril Sail
H!stcso (,41;
® p'alYvalGc Eelnw Surface (88);LRR S, T. Ui
r: 'r Eck (A9) (LRR 01
l Lp�pted-4 rA2)
Thin l Sirl ?LRR S. T. U)
wr' Mjck (A10) (LRR Sp
_ Mack antic 1•, i
_ Loamy Murky M `feral (F I i (LRR 0)
� hc:*iced 1lcrtic (F16i {outside MLRA 150A.8
Hydrogen Suitide (A)
� Loam} GMeyec Val (F2i
_ l Floodple n ScitS Il (LtRR P, S, TM
Strgltifled L8yer5 tAS)
Depleted V i!ri- 'F;)
i Ararnalo,r, t?ng'-il Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Org9niQ t3odte9 (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Re(',w Park SU1182e J-6)
iMLRA 1538}
i 5 rm Mucky Mirierel (A7) JLRR P, T, LI)
_ Cie plct^d Dnrk Surface (F7)
— Red Parent IVatenarl (TF2)
— Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Pecicv. Depres-sine . I F&1
Ver~i' ShaGlow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm h1.1ck (Aw9) (LRR P. TM
_ P. wi tr o; (LRR UM
_ Sher (rxplaln in Pemerksj
Dc-uYrAcd 9elow NA Surbcc I l i
Ur l[—, d 0ctiric (F111 IMLKA 1511
Thil'k r}hak :Lrf�jce Ins: r
Ila, %,r,[r.,i, a )Masses �F1: (LRR, ri, v T}
n,dieefc o(hyJropnytinvegrtatim and
Cmi1,I F:-Hind• PocOX eA16 ttrlLAA -150Ab
�� Ltrrc.rc Surface ("'131 tLRR F, T. L11
welland t l,7py read lie Aresent
6 F%.nJy Wc_kp fAir,i'iill ISv, (-PR O, S)
_ DeIta Ochr(c (= w . r'Otl � 1 11 i
unless dsslurted Or prahlernatic
..� S'm jy Gleyec WIn;: t •1"
T HeducedvWICIF1r. iUt F 4 1..1,;k. 11.('vti
_ Jana+ R.edox ($5)
_ Re,dricrt Flcucl :.,.I I r ::: , riVtR 1 l;.A)
t,.�•uea `, utrlat (S5)
_ Aridrieln,,s F-i� ,t Lc-n,y -�ous •.t 1=t 1A iJ"_Pl. 153C, 153D)
_ Derk Sauce (ST) ILRR P. S, TF U)
Ra5trrG[Ive Layertli4h•SCrYed�:
-- -• -
Gcu(n (irlcr.ekj-
Hydric
Sall Resent? Yes No
US Army Carps of Engineers AaIll and GuVCoerstal Plsln legion - °Ver964r12.0

JSC-W33 (JSC-W34 through JSC-W38, JSC-W41)
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantir- and Guif i;€aastai Flaii Region 4pry_
Projet#1Slte: ] At CilylCpurlty A`veli`- u'..- �7��s-` '— $arrplang Cate:
Appbca,riv hwner: } r "s ;r ^r_w p State. SamplinqPoInt t_-
tnveslKjatnr(s) 1 Section, TownaYlip F{ange
Landfoem (h,ltskrpe terrace, etc ]: ) Local repel (concave. convex„ pone (� � Slope
5utrregian(LRR a Fi�4 ML).� f / a+ Lit. i� ��� _ LGnr ( Datum: I97
Soil Map !Unit Name 1 r ` - - ,, � -�' - ,� •s_ �_ r Y�, NVVl class16callon
Are clrmatr� i hydrulpgic CCwdCi[aana of rr a s!te iyp,cal For RI rs ti ne qt year^ Yev No 01 co explain in Re+narka.]
Are vegae'tatron A . Soil r'f ... or Hydrology �[_ _ cign,lrr�ntly d0lurbe<t? ,ore Norma' Ci r tu 01M Ail te 9 premrti17 Yes No
Are Vei petafion 1V Soil X% , or Hydrology r®turatly proalem3!!c? of needed ext. lar- ant answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site wrap showing sampling point locations, transects, important futures, etc.
Hydrwl-ytic Vagetattor7 Preseol? lies I Q
yrxrric Sgll Present? �{ Is the Sampled Area
Yes ` kN° within a Wiotland7 y1" i 1. No
Wetland Hydrfllony Present? Yes No
Rernarka_ _ ..
HYDROLOGY'
Wedand Hydrology Indicatora:
Po rTidry Indicators 1,•ni"Irnum cf one !a re uprrLd. check all [hot rMpolyl
Sur`ace %Va:er I A i I
Aq.ratitFauna (913)
High Warer Table (A2; _
Man rjaptsi15 t115) (LRR U)
_L�:r S&.urA cin tA3)
Ilvdr„gen Sulfide Ctror t ;11
-- WateriMtnrk9 ((.t�
++
Ostidite7 Rhizospheres alonq I Ibing Root%lGII!
Seth men! t7epas 1s (l�3} _
Presence of Hedjcel lre.,n IC 4l
DOI Deposits (t33) —
Recent Itw Reouvion or Tillcd Coil! iCt3]
Algal Mal Or Crust If34) —
shirt Muck 5urta;.e IC f i
Iron Dep©sils i1351 —_
C3lt'& (Explain n Remalrk$)
In:Jrd2Won Vlsrbre on Aerial Irnagwy (87)
G°haler-5talned Leaves iHE9
F ] e'I cj 0bs a ryatiorra: -- —
St. -lace Water Presentl Yes No
Depth (if _SaRi:
VVa1er fah!aPre"N7 Yes --... Nn Depth (irr-wqI +�
5aturatlan Present, yes No Depth (ineht•s)
lincludes capillary fnnr,��_ _
Descr�rded data {stream gauge monitoring wrell aerial pnatos, prei6aus inspe
_R a marks,
tofryQM
r, ,-sCondBry indicators jmlrli h
Suriar-e So I Cr9Gk°. (86)
Sparsely Uegelaled Concave Surface (68)
DrOIMVg1' Patlerr.s f11311)I
Ill Trim Lines (516)
Dry -Season water Table (C2)
GMY11-1 h aLrF(IW9 (C-8)
Saturation VmWe on ,Aen4il Imagery (053
_ Geomwl 1. P4silion (D2)
-- Shallow Aquitard (D31
1=AC-Navtral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T. U)
V tland MydreNagy Present? 'Yes ✓ No
0"
US Amy Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Guff Coastal Plain Region — Version 2,0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
iil_e StreluM -0I01 We r` }
1.
2.
4.
4.
5
7.
B_
Absolute Dominant lnbutu
CQQrr Stecle571 stiltu`-
o Iate ICQ er
509b of total coder: 20OA of total caves
i .
r - •r
5.
' w Tctal ONer
H tr h
Sampling Pomi ✓' 1
Dominanco Test warks•hndl:
rlr rih=:r cf Dwiina V Si:icocs
r.)U". or FAC:
(Atj
xi I a,l... !w' .Y D"Inanl
t- 1% rcYss JI Struta;
(®j
PrevaterL; [iexun.�ri,t'rt�4
Tote1 ,., __� :_t':. _�. -
.tul[ir.i, ux ::
06L
FACW sperle5
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3
FACU species
x d =
UPL species
x 5 c
'rArnn Totals:
(A)
(R)
Pr°erralence Index = EVA
Hydmphyllt: vegntallcr h,11"alw',
% 1 -Rapid iesi 10r Hti=I K-%.� S:Qn
2 - Dominance Test h '---501,a
3 Pre,,alence Index is :E3 C'
P-4hltmPtic Vegetallon (lain)
'A —k II tr 1size- nGlci tur5 of * ydric so I ;,j N.cttand liydroloQy must
t =r assent Li es diStu h7yd cr p roole rr all c,
Daflnldons of Four Vegotatian Strata:
a
r Tree - Woody planes, excluding wines. 3 M. (7.6 erin) or
_ more i i diameter at oreasl height DBH}, regardless of
- height
6. 5apliin%13hrut� — Woody plants• excludrnr vines, less
i than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 R (1 rn) tell.
& Herb —At herbaceous (non-wwaadyt plants, regart#ess
g, of sire, and woody plants less than 126 it tall
M _ Woody vane —All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11, height.
12.
'-;,01A, O1'C0.l _4'.,Lr of total rcder.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50%oftot al cover:
morphotogical edapia-ian5
Kvg Jruµlrytrc
= Taul Cover Ve etatlon
F'rvznrrk"�
20%oftaral carder: _
YesNo
V8 many Carps of Friglneers Atlanti; and Gulf Coa " 1 am Re.qi .)r - Version 2.0

SOIL
.9nipl,nro Pe),11 r1�
Profile aascr;ptlory (❑@scribe ir_ti the depth ner•Atz d ro ri4cklrnpnt the lnri cator or Coninifn the aA,,;mtiCA nt It%c1caltrs.1
D: pin r i7irix Rkecox Fi:rl,.rt5
lhchCt, CCArx ir1a %. �,01 rrais[l �u tor,' _ext1rre Remarks
1 yV,- C=C mi;enl'd[lDrl O=L 1elve7io-i RM=Redurtd rSFdld!:r M,,,a 'llav E+ t7 5aia j 5r;l'In]
'-U':i.!: -Y1 P_=FlaC-
Ftydric Sell Indicatprs: (ArplIC,1019 io all LRRS,
u0vss otherw iz5to rlutod.9
tn,:lL�acors fcr PFoblamatic H drlc
Vlv reso (A-:
FOydalua EkciceA Si. --far! vgi (LRR 8, T. J)
1 Crrrvtuck iA. ) [ L R R 0
II L1u LPrpe�-Dn 1.3.
_ Thin Ca* Siur1b-:E f �d',LRfi 5, T. U)
1, un- h'uck iAl,ti:ILRR Se
Loarny NIL.'-'ky h�lnc•z1 4F+} (LR,R 01
Red: ced VEr7ic 11141 ioutslJP W1LKA 15QA.Ll;
1ydrogeri Si fde 1,Afl
_ Loam} CI?yed Metrik (F2�
_-'iecrncnv F'Iua.*lain Eoi°s i F I li i'LRR P, S, 71
_ _, ," 5cd _Ly:r5 ,M)
_ Llopletr-d MEtr Y. IF3)
Aro,nalo lj 6-gri Loam,, :::71!:. 1f
`I_a-1,, r f3c'iE:s iA6)ILRR P, T, U)
F edOx Dj,, sur;'ace I'M
IMI-RA 115M)
' .7l M.,rkY r.t,n�reI {A71) 4LRR P. T, UI
Duplctted Dark ! lrlace EF t}
Red P:rrc ,t M6tCrl8 (TF2}
h+ji. k P; esence IAB) (LRA U)
Fd�dm CepresMans (F8)
_ Vert+ Shallow Dark Sulrfam i T1 -
.1 ^nti PA it-k (A9y (LRR P, T)
_ r, ar ,:F 10);LRR U)
i ahe( Txplaln In Remarks)
:)eoieted L'cloh� Derk Sl..1TElCe'A.I 1 1
Fj1� plvti,ri C1ch:ic 4F' 1: (IO LRA 151))
_ T`, 1 i' k DN''l•_L. r`:1 C. t i Al 71
4
ir•rk r1 Sj A r Y.+:f. kl;, rti I F 12 i(L R R 4•r'p . AY l
0,
lvl:j—llvli L,r t'YjrL 1ylir vr.,J-Ialiolr 1
Cna,I F-air;r: Reanx (Ali;. (MLRA 150AJ
U-i-,hnc &jrkice (Fi',: (4RR P. T, UI
•A'F�1'id'rdtry;_"e'.':J,, rrs5k`q.
.._.... S:ir1ily 1Ar.r-'Ky Mirir,ra",`_;1, (.RR G, :5)
i Dtll.,, Och✓,c iF171 (MLRA 151)
Lill L'ti" dn'; k r•!::r•-..�mtl-i®
SeslrtyGleytL Yti9E1nr: t a; Peducr.ol.eruc ? (WRA'150A, 151'1nl
5ard}'ReC;; (85) Fedn,r•".=lecbpl;:lr,`a rF'j�i(M1LRA149F.:
STr,ppeu r,Autrix (SS} _ romoloi_ �r•& t I nDrny SaJS IF?4 PA l,PA IL9,j,
Dark Sur'ece (S7, (LRR P, 5, T, Ul
rtetlr)c:rlwq k,aiygr I opegrvea):
T3% L
Depth I Incr as),
k5
Nyd0c Sure Presant? 'Yei i+kp
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Regim - Vera-,iun z G

WETLANU ULTLRMINATION UATA'FORM Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
f'ro(ItrctlSlte: ( 'n
cir �untY P, l l� N7 fi
sa y�I Date:
r
AppllcanlX)ymer ,'.
Ir fj/
r _ State
m
saillpi g Point W f ( l ff+a
Ir7we5trg l�rlSi Fr a Ci �li p
L? `rA
5eelinn TpurnShip. R.nro¢e.---
Land(orm (hdtslope, ierrace, etc):
',A y-
Local relief (caancaue. carivew, non" . i_ ,`,X
Slope (k,1
Subregion (LRR or MI-RA)'Z
L d I d j L.9 J
Gf L Cialun5 � r
Soil Map Una Name � `_.:._:_?.
r f
r . '" r _ �° �' . ;... _._.... 4WI elassificMion _.. � ..
Are r..11mallcJ hyrtkrgiC condJt rs on the sile typical `D, !his: Irene ot+vtar" Yes. No 4_X___ (II no explau- rn Remarks.I
Are Ve,gelation & , Soil cr Hydro"y _ .. _ gn-fir arrl, dMurbed7 Are'Nonnal C rcumstances- present? Yes Y, No
Are ;re. _^tatnon . S,o _p{" or 1­10drr7l4�gy nutLra la p cblemglrc? (If needed. expkaii any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Mydrophylit. Vegetation present?
H'ydric 5011 Praselnt?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Rernwkc:
��
.a
HYDROLOGY
Yes _ No
Yes W No
YeS Fti7
(,(V rr=
Is t1A0 Sampled Area
within a Watlalnd7
Welland Hydrology Ind cator­
Pnrnafy
I,-., all ltldi al7Y7ii,°
Surface Water (Ail -_-
Acuallc i•errna (813)
V High We ter Table (A2l �
Mari Deposil9 (815) (Um 11)
Sal Urallori (A3)
Hvdrogwr SUlfii7r.''` :,i; :",' i
Waller Marks (91)
O] idixed RhIzospheres along t :Vinc t WJ%
_ Sediment Deposits (021
of He(!". i .i Ilfr: iCC
C7rifl Dep0303 (03) _
Recent Iron Reou-ocl, - � 'led Sadly (Ct3)
Algal Mat or Crust (OA) _
Than Muck Surhrcn, (1_• ' i
Iron €Wopsits (85) _
{ether (Eflplaln In Rem aras )
Inundation VHs ble an Aerial lrmgery (B7)
_ VMItr-Slarned Leaves IB9)
Ftl w Qhserwatlpno:
Yes _4_Fie
Se xsno f i n i 1R Lfl!_rLm 1�► of Iwo reQuired)
_ 3urraue Sail Cracks CBS)
Sparsely Vegelateo Concave Surface (B®)
Drainage Patterns (GiO)
Moss Trim Lints (8161
Dry -Season Water Table (C21
Crayfish Burrows (C81
.Saturalion V Arbte on Acf,al lma!y*'ry (UT
Geolrnorphic Poelunn (D21
�.,,..., ShalMowAquilard(03)
FAC-Neutral Test (11)5)
_ Sphagnum inoss IDS) (LRR T, U)
Surfaoe Water Present? Yes NC V Clapth (ltrdma
wale, r able pres"t7 'Yes � No — Depth (i ichesy—
SatuFat1u0Proser1t7 Yes No Duptt (indm). 12 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No
(includes capillary fringe l
lJPsrr,he Remraed Data (stream gauge rmonitnring welleerlal phoins, previous inspections) iI nvaitaNe,
Rem,arks
U.5 Army Corps of Engineers Alla -lUc and GLV CaastaI Plain Regio,i - Vers,br 2 4

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific narne-. of plots
r fee ;Rraturi I ;lot s4ze
2
3
5o% of iomi cover:
3.
r.
Fi
5.
ea rr piing %rill r4� ee
Pdi,� d u I ! [ '-,i rr q ar) I I r 1 [1 Ca 10,
DnrT1Ir1aT1nR Tw;t wnrkqhe4ol:
_14—COLLIL -2LU=,Z s
Number of Dorn i no n! Species
7
I h nit Are 03!L. � ACV at F&C_'
tA)
Tciaii Number or CoornInant
7
SpeciesAcrqss All Strata-
Percent of Dorninenill SPOCeS
7,
That Are OBIL, FACV.' (x rAC.
(AM)
• G7 = Tcta Lrrjer
20% cill lot b I, _- v4e -
-7. 'r? YL _' f t 1
of Lain Laver
_r'7XI 01 tXdl cover.
2
4
7
9
12.
50*,5 Of total Cavui
2C a J 0zit a I cover.
�!i n e- 14 rat, u m I P I ot sae
A
Ja�
5.
Total Cover
509b of 14Nal wvec
zu.h ot total co'er:
Remarks; (Ifob4m(Yed. IiSt Me"01591cal adaptations Wew)-
PreviWence Index work sheet:
Total % CcNer V. ML114: IV by_
O6l_ species _ X 1
Fo%C* species it 2
FAZ SneClerS 3
F A4J 5 re n,e S x 4
VPL cipeoes X '
Golumn Tot,,!is iAy 113)
Reyalencc Irdin � B+A z
H ydrDp hyl I c Ve gel ti 1.1 c n Indicators:
I R �4 p �A "e c' I for Hyd' op), ytre Vege.11 0 or
Pit! Index is a 0
Prob Ic rr o- µ,, r rDph -; ( , Ve g c i: a t Or ? F- xr! ', i
Ino calory o' r-,Jwsoi �' J '?.ethind hydirclogy must
be r r LIS (V: r m.,; C lsc'tx ��' o' r, rco I em ati c.
Definitions of Four Vaqa;rI,nn .51rMa:
Tree - Wcody plOrilt cxclud ng wiOdt. 2 In. (7.6 tM) &
rncrr in ripniLter a7 Dreasthe pr), regardless M
heiql­l:
Sapling Shrub -Janis exu',jlinq wines Its,,
tha- in L11:311 and greater than 3.2t ft 0 rw fall,
Herb • AJI 1,erbaceouS JIWWOOCIYolanN, *k'�MILISS
Cf c;F7P and j-orr7,y Npints l—, rhan ? 28 fl fall
Woody III nE! -All woody vines gre;j:er ['an 315 I III
height.
Vegetation
prusolit? Y op s No
US Army Corps of Engineers Allar1ic and Gulf Coastal Plain Reglan - Vill 2.0

SOIL barnpling Po+ril. -f --" " '► , ff
Pro Fll a pegcrlptIQry (l7escrltaat a the depth headed to docurhent the Indlcatot C}r C drillll'M the hbteoce Of l"ClumI,)
Depth Vatnv _ ..._ Redd[ Ffmtares
(hches} Cdcr'moi t) °>e bola(rra t�_. ��_ 1erture
Type t,' a. Gfwentr cr I —Deli ei Or1. qR9=ReC
-ed Piro r y 1,15 Yl skeU nd Grap15.
G+' 1I:7n fir? L
Hydric Sail Indicators:(AvWlleabia le all LRRS,
u.rless othurw..so holed.)
Ir,dlcatars for Probinrriat5c Hydric SoiWs'
sd.sc A1) _
F=cly^.-2I e F.elvn- 8,zlacer (SO ILRR S, T, Uj
l cm Muck (AUi I�RR Q)
_ HrMie EDire&n lA2—
1 run U61H SJ11FC:e I �'c.i (LNW S, 7, U)
_ �,' r.irr MUCk (AlW [LRR 5}
„Blackhishc(A3b
LDam) Mui:kybiner3I.F1ytL9R0)
_ F,;:du•:edVcrtic1F"81(uLdsidoMLRA4riLA.Ei
Hydrogen Sultlde I,P.4i
Loarmy Gi" yw Matr x F22
_ l-'. :'•"� :"+'I , Ic.ha'.i, i-,, salls ifls) (LRR r', 5, TI
Stratified Layers (A51
❑eplelec Wdr.r: ;F31
: Anc,rx. ,-. , .i :v I _ orrr{Sails (F20;
= QrgaMe BodICstAb1 [LRR R T. u
Re icy nark Turin^eiF6)
IVL9A 1 i',Ei)
5 cm Mucky Oil e-utIA7IfLRR P. T, U) �
Deplelec _'Li. �u-'ace (F)
� ;::' I'L c,,.', ViLleial(TF21
Muck Prescnee (AW ILRR U) _
RGdw, Qcpre%scans, (F-8)
v . • w Sh€, , t Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 rm MuGk (AB) fLRR P. T)
marl rrio7 (LRR U)
;'-hr.r (FxWiiain Iv RerTmarks)
0eplet,ed Mow Dark S�1rface (Aii;
Dep,:-l^b Cc1%6c (Ft1) JWLQA 151}
Thick dare 5ur€aae I,A1 d, _
Iran u:inrj,ne,-v Mdssts (F12 gLA 0, P, Tp
-rndiew ars of hydrephytic vegel atirn and
Coast Frairiv Redo> (All6) (MLRA 1 50A)
Urr-P* .aurfar.a, , F13t (LRR PIT, U)
8e'''gnd hydrology must be preseil.
Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) (LRR 0. S) _
r e..ih., f`Ichr,r: "I= 17 (fIALRA 1511
a lless disturbed or PFablentatrc
_ $an0; a3 ey►icl hAainic(S4) _
r:.--.r=:-,. Vertic IFI�.)j 'ILRF 1AA,15p13l
Sandy Redox (65) _
Fieornent rloodplain 5cirs 1 Ft;) (MLRA 1-09A1
— 5".ripped Matrix 1361
,anomalous aright Lwmy� 5Qas fF1Q: ;MLRA 149A. "� 3C, 15aD7
_ Owl( SurfBCe (57) ILRFt F. 5. T, U)
Rosrrictiva Laycr (Ifuhserwd)
r.�z.�
Depll (iw hesr.
Rcrrark�
Hy4ric 5oll PFesoW Yas _ Na
U3 Arrr°v CcrDs of Enginumrs Allnn6r {end Gotf Coostal Plain Rc�iCn — Vc••"4irLxi "

JSC-W40 (JSC-W29 through JSC-W32, JSC-W39)
YYETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
( .' r". 1 �'�'"ar .with - J r os �' r
Pralaci.'Slte CNylGDUnfY � Sernpllteg date:
Applisau1QGvrnet. L , i , !; i {%C 4''1 -,_ state Sampling Punt Ifs � b a✓
InveStlgaler(s) i G Ci "�" - � } ` Q ``+` Section T0w,19NV. Rdnge vl ?I tf,, r, G r!�) S
Landforrn (hilislope. terrace, etc) C . as Locai relief (concave caivea, none) F W (,"V'$�- - slope slope 1%)
Subregion (LRR ofMLRA) ff �� 4 Lel . i 1 '� -17,0�),4fl Datum r 5 C
Sriil Map urns Name: N u"II classificteliu tf'7 f
Are ^IIrMill iC � hpdroleoe conddiors osi rh site ry0eall for IN trine or yoar- 'fit N6 [II n6 6xvl2in in Rerr.ark' )
Are VegelatiDn "} .-%I rl/ ,ur ar7Fotp9Y-ff' significantlydislur6ed? Are'Norwalpi-e.e t? wee- No
—
Are VegetaUan 1 �+ - Soil . or it raturally probleIri$tit Of "..Hddd. explao ney ar''Sv trt -r Rbrvs—ks.l
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site rriap showing sampling point locations. transects, important features, etc.
Hy drophytic Vegetatioin Present? Yes Y' %
Hyarlr Present? Yes NID
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes s No
Remarks. q 6
qt»Yw 1 .Cry,✓P
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrolouy Indicators:
I9 the Sampled Area
within a Weiland? Yee No
p'ei r$ry Indre$j0f$ (nlioirliyri r_l Urle i9 reQUired,
ch&dr all lh5 t aDGbl)
Surface Water(Al}
AqualicFauna $13)
High Watet Table (A2)
Mad deposits IS1S)1LRA BI
Ealutalion (A3)
m Hydrogen S%mllidn Odu, (CT)
_ Waier Marks (131)
— Oxidized Rhazospheres anng Living Rws
sedirmern perils (82)
Presence of Reducea Iron [Cdl
DrA Qepwwls [S3)
_ Decent irrm Reducrron,n Tilled Sailn (C6
Algal Mato( Crust (1341
� 'rNn Muck Surtace IG? I
Iron Deposit$ IB5)
_ 0Vi& (Explain In Herna°ks)
Inundalion %rbore on Aerial Irnla+gpry rg7)
Ware( -Stained Leaves;1139)
Field Observation a.
Surfaze Water PreserA9 Yes
No Depth (inch)'
Wale, table PresenP Yes
No Ueplh (:Pchea):
Secondary Indicators tmimmum i]f two r uir
Su,fer a Soil Cracks (BB)
5parselp Vegetated Concrive 5urfaru= (BE)
�, 6rarnage t5a'tcrns t1310t
Moss Trim Lines (B t 6 i
_ ❑ry-Season VVAi,--r 7aoIr-jCr)
CrayfiSrl B41rrpWS iU)
Ssn'uratH)n Vr3r41e on Aer.Bt 4R5$r fire {5 +1
Geornorpnrc F'OMW 102)
Shallow Aquliard (l]3)
JAC-hieutral Tiegt [a5''
SJ'laglluln lnast, ,Ubp Il-RH T, t1)
Saluratrori Prttentl Yes . Nb _ IDeMh (lnchm): � 1gf"And Ftydrol"y Pit"O tt? Ytts
irtcludps capillary fringe) _
l?escrioe Recorde 7 data (stream oaU(a9. rraonllonng vvLtl. aerial pholo5, previous inspe*oins), it avalaUe'
Rer7arks
US Army Corps: of Engineers Atlantic and GO CG=31 Plan Region - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scierdiftc Tames of plenis
Ah-mkile -)ryrinant inrticalor
T.eyeStrelurri (Plot Size: J{.1 1 1/oCgLe ti eces S7ri1us
1
2.
-
f
'
3,
6,
7.
8.
_
Teal Cower
50% Cl total tov&: Z0% m total rrwe'r,
gaolinal&hrub Siraturra (Plot size: Fse )
3.
4,
5.
7.
8.
= rctal 4<t�+er
50% of total cover. 2+:"A of Caul cjver
Herb Stratum (Pint size:
6. J^ riii��rry r-
7.
9. ---
1p.
11.
1�
-T[bl Co'-'c r
50% of last cower: tcfal cover
vi ay Vine Stmturm (Pict size )
a,
4.
5.
= 7ata l C,mer
5D% of total odor. ® 20%of total cover:
Remarks, (it observed, tistmorphdogical adaptations celow).
&.0 4 fi f,., lr"
Sempiirg Pant
11nm1nan,ce Test mrksheer.
Nnm,er of Dominant Species
Thar Are 06L FACIA, or FAC j 4
Total Number -1 1.3 mrnarr q
Species Across Nr S-ata. its
P j;, AIV of r?ornir.gn, Sp, FA,
Frevaluirro Inrlcx'.,tDrK5heal'
Toxel ':„ '-'ul of
Mrrlk[aly t y.
081 ^=5 ::..
x 1 =
PAC
x 3=
x 4 =
UF
x 5=
Cdurnm Totals
(A)
F'r a v'i L rI C C: In d s. =E3fA=
Hydrophylic VegelaLlunlndlcatUrs:
i - RApid lest for HyIdrophyfie Vegetelnon
I
2 - Dominance Test as }501
3 - PreV6den�ue �ndax Iti �2 e'
Prdblemah=-iydrophyiic degera',on tFx;nhrinl
rl fl iC0tum b ul ``id1 I;: SDiI �c,J ,met le'id hy3i al'xgy must
be aresenl ri e.Ss rlis:urtrrrf n; pr t'lem�t c
Uot-pnigims of `oiar vogaation StYata:�
Tree - vvcoc-), p an:�, ufirlud rg wines E CM, cr
rnD-c in 1inmcte, ar Lreaal he ght(C31
heigryt.
SaPDh0jShrub - Wbady plant:. cx. L d%riq vnrl. e
than 3 in DBM aria greeter than :3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous ,non-wOCcly) plants, regardless
04 1,12e and voocp plants less than 3.28 R'tell.
WUvd,y vine - Al, r^ady ;"net :Treater Ihpn 3.28 ti
heigtit.
Hyd,uplrytic
VegEtatlmn
Presorit7 lrosNo_
US Army Carps of Engineers
Atlnntic and G'uO Coastal Plaln Region -Version 2_D

SOIL
S3rx't'lir5r'1 P4.11 -=
ProflI a Dese rIptlotl. jDescObe to the depth needed to documerll the Indicator or corrfli-M thlb Ap#ence nt Incilca:ars.l
❑rept`. Matm Reds Feotures
rim;hes� Cclafr►roisfr 5� Cvorinclhli % =& Lac Texture Remarks
ITAe C t+ncenii 3!lon L f er eJo,r RPA=Reduced h"altix. M5 VutAed 5art d Grails. _.
I- v-;ajL.rl F _=Parr _I ring 1;=F al f r.
Hydrit Soil triditalrvs, tApvlic:,trte lrx art LRRs
am!o,.s otherv,risD noted ) Incrcatnrs
fnf Prairde nadr -lydric Sodrs
Histcsu (A''
FLAYvalue Below Surface (S8 t (L.RR I., T. U'
_ I :,rr Muck 0---) tLF.R C
I IIstvc L-0ir•eIof, I:`4-I}
!• , LL,vN SuftCLi (S9) [LRR:S: T, Ljj
— C cW r,iuck 010:1LP. R; r
13.ack1�ist!c1,A2i
L�)3rnyrrluvkeMirealIF'I(LRR0)
Ffe s:CjV iw,,F1[ItUutsltlaRlLRA75QA•i�1
Hydreptr tea 1`•Ce (A.a,j
_ 1-o=rrn CI rd Mal .nx:r2)
_ Piedmon' rlrv)*lain rF1:j1 iLRE P. S. Tl
T Sustifieri _[:;tars (A5>
_ Doa!&.d hits".tly ,F".
F,ro.YlaYu,i; 5-I.;hi.oe;n.vSoil YF.^;
Organic f-nli s I4.FY (LRR P T, I-1l
_ Rerin:i r]erri€ Er.rtn^e (F"F
9U LRA 1�38)
tOu,'.,y t�f.nur'al tATI ILRR Fa, 7, U%
_ Deplet.d Utirk Suefao(; iF: i
RFA Pire"It h,i-ArirrTF ,
MUCt f 'Csr'^!ce 5A9" (-RR LJ)
—. Redar? Qup•!essi ans IFE]
_ Vefr , .hal'Ic c1rin_e i -F 1.
1 r--, ViicN iA, i jLRR P, T)
m F : I tF 1'.i ;LRR U)
~', er rhp•Isi in
OepIct=d eac ow Dork 8. j-facr +,,1 r'
Ucp"ctcd C)chric f FY 1; (MLRA 151 1
Thie4 C7,rrk Sur%-'L-rAli':
_ Ircxr M-nLILir!-, rA„ tit ,F':"i [LRR P, TI
WJ a,ilrars CI I ytrc r yl ,_ p�Fk3i• n in,
P'Whe Redus fAI6� W LRA 154A(�
OT' ,-: Surtecv i-- I - JLRR P. T. U�
-,P etl�na hyd-Ulogy rr,ust Se L rL,�enI
,dridy MurHy Mir^er.71 'S11 jLRR 0, SI
_ DkeII, C::•iriC d- 17; CALRA 151 I
Lin a.
vencly(�Icjk;zlVl8)Im?!4f
_ F2C[u ri0l;t,'1ciF't1�WLfda,15oA,1505)
_ S8ndy R doz !05)
_ F• e:Jnrcnt Flood;:�i,% Scils k; F l � (M LRA I49A)
.' Jrlpr— Malm, (Sr;i
_ Anore r-us S,r!g"kt Loa-Y Solls (F29) JMLRA 149Ar 15OC,, 1=3
jhtH 6ur1ace i571 ILRR P, S. T, UI
Rastrtctivo Laynr rIf ohscrved);
Depth (inches)= _.. ..
F'se�tE,r+.s
F1ydric Suit Present? Yes Nrr
US AUmy Corps of Engdreer9 A!1ainbc and Gulf Coestad Plain Region r Verslon 2.0

WLTLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Main region
r.t rt
C-if r ',.
ChyrCounity: Sampling Gate:
,l?ci site:
_
Stale ' Sarnph" Paint if.
Secuon.Township Rnnje lar1. tr �'Cr1
Landkn-n rivisi:]pe, terrace Bte i_
(ConCave Lt' iLrrr .i;Yn�*r' �f}+✓ `[ t.
�� � l t � � +" � ,t � � L � 4
Statse ly')
4I�(j Gj
� `.^.
Su, regivn fL RR of MLRA) ®i
i `'
Let � - s� �
trr q � �
De+turn
S61 Map UnA Narne
Arc climatic ; h drolog�is C0-1�61`t�0rs
on the site typical for Ihi, time ❑l yc'.30 Yes
No (It no explair c Rugarks.)
Are Vegetation 1 , Sc7,1 _ 0
, OF H'ydrdogy
�.tjnitii„-er-ri5 oist4rbed7
Are Nara-;i presents
Yes No
Are'VegeWhDn _tAf . Seel -V
xi�d. cKplain any answers r• Remarks.l
StjFALRARY OF FJNIDIhGS - Attach site reap showing sampling point locations, transects, important I(eatures, W.
Hyplopnyi'- Vegr:tStiarrl Present? Yes Kb 1� the Sampled Aroa
Hydrtt,Soil FfBsent? Yes Ns
wifr,in � Weria+*'ri'� ve*
Welland Hydrok)gy PrgSOM? Yes
HYDROLOGY
V00an,d Hydrology trrdieatcrm:
Secondary lndicatoei trnmirr�r m q Fiy,�-uL r
larinjwy IndrtatQ] s jmininx.m cf Qne is regorred
0mck rl iFrgLapp j
_ Surface Soli Cracks (B6i
_ Surface Water (Ai t _
Aquatic.Fauna (B13i
_ Sparselp Vegelated Concave Surface IB$)
t•Iigh1 Wafer table (A2)
MVF1 [)EVQ-.OS i13' } (tRR U)
_ Drainage Pattems (0110
_ $aiatralron lA3l
r' },Irri, :- SO -de 01.1: 1 1'-1 l
_ Moss Trim lines 13161
_ Water Marks 1131 )
C}Midi: e7 ;h:mr -F.h -ri"� i iving Rook 1C3)
� Dry -Season Water TaVe (C21
bedirnenl Deposits IR2)
Pi- ,rr r.r'' of Rr::i"rC.r tic i 1 ;.4
_ Crayfish Burrows (C.S'i
Drift deposits (W3
r; cc, ,.i + cr I' -r, _ - a r ,r ', dl•r S0119 ICSJ
s Saturation Viarble on Aerial imagery (Cg)
Algal Mal pr Cru9', iU4)
1 n,'1' %11 =: In . •1 :
_ CGeomorphic Pasilivn (132)
:on Deposits(K)
1.:itw! "r f'.eo i;j =;
Shallow Aqultwd(031
. nundaiicn Visible cir Aerial imagery {(37)
FAC•Neutrol Test (051
Weler-5tairwd Leaves ;59i
moss (Q8) tLlklk T, tf)
Field Qbservationa:
Surface Water Prexent7 yes No
V depth ( rnhes).
Vd,;ter 1 ahle NresenO Yes Na 7 Depth (+nches):
Saturation Ptesent? Yes — NoDepth (rnchcs 1 YV4tland Hygralopyf Preaont7 Yes
includes €aprllary "qeL__
Dp,scribe Recorded Data (siream gauge. mondor ng well aerial photos prev10ij5 inrpeCtans) if avgilable-
lk'ernarks
N a. 7t
US Army CcM& of Engineers Attantie and Gulf Casslal Plain Region - Versivn 2 0

VEGETATION (Forar Strata) - Use sdentiffc names Df plants
AlhscUe Dcr-rant Inr4icator
I fie �'lratuna s;F'lof Size � � °?u LG�++E�f cares? `.';fiiui
= 1Qtal CQVer
501A ot;otal cuter.
20`?fa of Ict©I cweF
SaolinEdShrub
5lrrr gm Old sire; M' � t
r -
.
2.
_
3. -.
C
B.
7.
B.
3 = Total Crner
ri
50% aA total cover.
200A of total cover
Hr �,-='.1n,
(Plctsize. j
1
2.
3,
4.
5,
7.
6.
= Total Carer
50,E Oftnml cover 20%of tolaI crrver
WocdyVr)e areturn Pat S"xe 1
4.
r Total Cover
5(rA oftorsl corer - ?796oftotaI covers
m"ELms: of ooseryea, list[-norpnaog"car aaapiatrons oetow)
`3er�rp4ng �4�nt t"
DOrnlnancc TPs ;g v11 Ilk .h ;l
That arr H F '1': (A)
qA,-Oy; A)'Sliatsa' 7 (B)
Triot .N e C•EL FAC "'. or FA_ 7/ "^ t l3)
Provalanc'e Index woNsoaet:
Taal % Cover of.
'OUREphx P
GEL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x a =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species _-- __— -_.
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column TolaIs:
fAl
rre-,)3I,,nee irdey ,� B/A = - ~
Ftyhrophyllc Veyelalleanindlcators,
1 - Rapid Testfor HyCroohyt-c bVgetalion
2 - Dominance Test rs >5n,,k
Pre,4ence Inlet. is 53.0'
Prdbiernatic riydrophylic V"eSalion ,Explaih)
(R)
"Indicators of hyr&Ir, &0 1J wetland hyrlydogty arust
he praseni anlrs dis!rime,d or to rob lernat c.
darinitians of Fear Vagatation Strata:J
Tra& - 4Ncody p,anrs. eu!rudir,p %nines. 3 in, 17.6 cm) or
mare in diamrtle' as breast height iDSH), regardless of
height
SapilnW811hrub -Woody plants" excluding vitas, less
than 3 in. 013H and greater then 3.26 i t (1 m) tell.
Herb - All herbaceous encn-+woody) pinnls, regardless
of size. and woody plants Ness then 3.281t tell
Woody vine - All woo* vines greater than 3 28 R Ir
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetallon
Present"? v95--L Noy,,®,_
US Army Cc" of Engl nears
.Atlantic and Gu f Coastal Plain Regipn - Version 2_0

SOIL
53mpring Point ;�
Prallle LJe$crtptlon: r(L)escrjbe to the depth ntr c'+-fl r 71,,r: rr,E Eh? Indledte,r or tonFlanl
Ihat a�:ise'nte of Indcat
l�f•jr"r _.h1a�r.i._.._....-...____......._ _m.,_.� ks���lt"; Fertu�rr���
i n_.he 51 L-'00' ;gor l_ <y CAIu f',� r.i , _an LCrtWL:rt.
F D-sec, ,rn RM=:Reductc1`0�rix ?ASh❑scedSan dUr3l,s
v �c C:=woi4rr71r�tgn. _ _ _.._
La�eUcxl Ir_=F'are''_•II,I,.V=%latrk
... ,,..
Hydric Sall Indicators (Ap-plicabW to all LRRs,
unless othrarw50- noted 4 Indicatarsior
Prot119MaNG Hydnc Svi"s':
H,stcso rrw.'-:
PCIyaIUC Relafi' 'r.rfac; ;Se r (LRR S, T. U;
t cry rrluck ; l-i iLRIR O
Hvvrlc ,Ipea rf I A 1
I nl� Lielrk Suriece •. 1J, ILRR 5, T. t<)
_ r,n, Mtl; k W01 ILIRR $)
Bla';k -15tIc I k4 I
_ Loamy Mu --K-; V1,c,e-! F' I (LRR C)
Re :7 cec V !c , F 1 C I t0uRSIJa K1LRA, 15QA,6)
Ilydrep=r Si fide ,A4;
LOamyGlcyed Mai nu cF2'
_ Piedmcnt Flavdphln Sca',s iF13 i'LRR R, S, Tj
`_—at.fird : eyers ^A�)
_ DepIcicd F.'6"i _F W s
_ .4ra'-n314.,s 6-Ipri _czmy Soil: IF -!
4.r3avc E°C�J+es i4i�f ILRR P T; UI
_ Rednr Dark SI:1a :e I Fe1.
lLl LRA 153151
Vlj� 4y mt0:l IA7) ILRR F, T, U1
_ Unplc'ed anrk ,curt>_ct II 'i
_ Qed i'arent M.:Ecna JF2)
M-c[ F''esence rna.' (_RR. U)
_ Redo'x O0 Lpi"sioris i.F�, 1
yr ry ?�hcllc'•t, [)&rk SUrfwm (TF12)
1 c� Vu+ k lAZ� ILRRP, T)
_ hlrirl'rioq (LRR UI
%'^er 'Fipl)in in Re nerkS)
Deplctct I'.eld"ov Durw $UriteC (A'.. I _
GcFl1Glr:-1 c:)cr-ic (F1 I° 1'i�I Fr 1 I ;
Th:n,a CL,rlt S.I T,I :v I
I'r)I NA •ntl.anr �,r,':!Y.t• F " rI.R2 C,. o
inn mature. ul ryJruPhytic vegetalian and
_ Ci nS1; P a rio Reidcx ref 6y (HII.R•A 150Ap
Ltm"c-c Surface Ir 1 _, ILFR P, T. Lh
wetlar•d I-yv` ology must he present
;�dnrfy t.I.ic,ky KImUlA (�;1 I ILRR C• sl
Celli: %cnnu tf=17: (14LRA 151 r
un ess ulalurUed or PrcraleMU11L
Sandy Gl"d Yatfn r�41
_ Reduced Vert c (F' d y xW, rt a 1 _'JA. 150E31
bandy Reda,x ; 55i
_ R�dmont rtoo dplDin Scar i I I';' tMLRA. 14gA)
5trIDPUd hiEoh:!n {. r.;
ArLor*Vous k3r 9V LoDn*,y �3c Is'F.A, JMLRA 14BA, 153C, 153D)
rtrk "=urli:c+e IS,, rLRR F. 5, T. U)
l3w;tTintIVCr Layer .;If abscrvod).
TtiTc.
Depth [Inch,,, _
R e murlts
US Army Carps d Engirreer3
Hydric Sall Preserrt7 Yes Nu
Atlent,c and Gulf G'oestal RaIn RegO — Verslan 2.0

3
- E
o
w
z
m
�+'
"
$ �C
°
m
3
`
Y
w
U
Ffn
�m
N
to
Q�
m Q
c O
20
O.
d-O O
' IL
.
a
L a
V m
= N
vv
-rs
ws
r.
Z
aM,
N
�
3
n
c �
z
c
Y
GO
O
� �
++
ri
!
q
N
R4

❑
o
C
-
9
F� m
m
a L
Ol O N
o
r�
.a
F Q N •� 0
Ki..
N
gm V
'L
8 ✓ c
o
O
a v 0
o
f
r
Y u) d
z
a`
o
O
�
0
a
F�
sr'
z �e
Z
V
N
w
r F �
� � !� `fit �� ♦ 3'.+�
k
IaGf ti

R
�
ryry
,•.'�� x I rl 1 ��! -

- C vim_ ' •.
t

Natural Resources Conservation Service Soils Data Extracted from Craven County5SURGO data available athttp://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/.
ark Smith Creek Racin. N
•••
•. •. ••r •.
'Highlighted fields indicate dominant soil components.
cComponent Flooding/Ponding Duration: Asdeftedb:tha Nk-ithin the SSURGO database and availablefrom:http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov.
Brief: 2 to J days, Long: J to 3D days, Very Long: more than 3D days
cComponent Flooding/Ponding Frequen.: Asdefined by the NR. and available from: htps://www.nres.usdagov/wps/PA NRCSConsumption/download?cid=nrrseprd1296628&e#-pdf
Non e(blankfield�: floodingisnotprobable. Flooding occurs lessthan once in 500years. The chance offloodingisnearly Dpercentin anyyear.
Very rare:flooding is very unlikely but possible under eztremely unusual weather conditions. The chance offlooding is less than 1percent in any year.
Rare: flooding is unlikely but possible under a nusual weather conditions. The chance offlood!2g islet 5 percent in anyyear.
Occasional: flooding occurs infrequently under n ormal weather conditions. The chance offlooding is 5to5D percent in any year.
Frequent: flooding is likely to occur often under n ormal weather conditions. The chance offlood ing is more than 50 percent in any year but is less than 50% in all m onths in any year.
Very frequent: flooding is likely to occur very often under n ormal weather conditions. The chance fflooding is m ore than 50 percent in all m onths of any year.

WETS Table data, available from: http://agacis.rcc-acis.org/?fips=37049 (accessed August 14, 2020)
WETS 5laucn NEW (3CFiN - A5O5, NC
0.equesled pears, 1971-2000
red�peren�re rrF
Mrurllr
A.,1
A.,
manly
1 my
J:,r,
N4 1
346
rein
NAG
3F
U.,
FN 7
47
A,
13 6
hG J
Mny
AG]
193
Jun
A67
1F9
Jul
89.2
71 i
Aug
E'I7
70.4
Sep
83.6
653
Oct
719
S32
Nev
669
45
Dec
58.1
17.0
A-1
Av9ra9e
73.2
52.7
slat
STATS TABI F
Total pmdpita6m, (irh9c)
Yr
Jan
Feb
K.
NO@
4.80
1.72
A.41
N01
2.19
276
510
2002
377
2 20
8 12
NO3
221
53,
3.86
2004
120
4 36
257
2005
24Q
261
3.80
20W
24G
1.54
227
2007
3 s2
244
111
2006
2.60
322
335
2909
1 B6
2 09
247
2010
441
371I
316
201,
2.65
323
241
2012
243
222
31s
2313
103
1 31
1 17
n14
3.97
2.55
460
3915
149
M3A9
39G
7'J16
171
031
133
J91 i
17N
1 9!
S J3
201Y
AJ2
1:55
413
M9
397
111
141
?07n
7 05
F N2
121
h'r4r x rJnr.r rnu ";n
F 7' mAr�fra_.r
�:rr:•
w Yrnoo.l.Im
Liss mrss'nS W F'r 6a1� • a nCn^ [v
ree•'f a�en�
C.aaPcc oaf 2P2O9&r,
Precipitation statistics:
I...-:.. , . ....
Precfplredo Inches]
Aa
3n14 nl,nnuu
Avg n-i r
Fw n
daiW
Avg
win hnrrr
of days larch
In1nf
n,c°1
leas lhan
mon
Then
0.10rmmh
snrmaall
44F
41?
:351
h!3
A
nA ��
4l+.
:4 It
714
10.4
F
n9
434
4M
-1tih
5l1
!
Gh
tiJn
359
?is
A119
F
GG
�vr
94h
31.7
s24
r
GG
rFF
SdA
:317
h3%
f
GO
N 3
927
4 62
7 36
9
0.0
79 a
692
4 61
&.15
r4.4
543
3.17
6.60
6
1A
64.1
325
1 4S
396
5
0.0
557
320
199
387
5
0.0
47 5
186
2.57
497
6
05
Si sl
56.OG
62.9
-
5410
01
Measured
precipitation:
Apr
Play
Jun
Jwl
Au®
Sep
Oct
No
do..:
Anne
6.36
355
1.98
1183
944
$75
013
355
222
55 ^I
1 77
405
569
7 F6
720
0 87
080
1 99
2 @8
.1 .;
I Is
262
4.45
555
450
146
303
369
253.
-12-
716
1010
6.89
sei
512
761
549
200
75..
11_.
295
9.94
4.40
355
963
949
131
29r
248
Jo"
2.49
599
7.21
6r6
119
5is
134r
2`.8
3.68
51 2.
570
315
571
a13
99,
0
321
016
490
52l.
395
261
416
ip1
13T
309
256
0GO
2G3
17 vG
$03
200
094
499
322
736
142
328
374
di 02
19,
432
121
365
017
358
1&1
1Od
550
s1-9
052
143
06i
297
626
3G 79
1
106
302
sJ 51
156
947
26G
304
1504
351
202
23s
G72
39O,
2h2
7IG
26G
1i 13
716
4n
397
a51
191
=_r. .e
226
1,79
021
374
G00
3.25.
321
Ads
2.39
12Q
403
192
3t9
652
9.13
7s8
233
37S
1.15
5-V
Inn
7n3
776
7ni
077
666
ei 07
594
Gd3
G631
169
firs
347
171n
h14
11 In
111
111
3N1
6h 31
AN
4A9
166
5:4
81:1
K(lh
4!3
nV
1J3
hi 11
M419
A61
1?7
970
1'39
19 39
1Ad
fill)
6h9
/91f
.1 BE
1F3
414
4ilF
641
6a
]44
aFJ
.119
SJ 24
264
Afh
661
748
im n3.
V%
Delineations for the Jack Smith Creek Basin were conducted from early June through mid -July.
Precipitation in June was above the normal range: 6.67" with a normal range of 3.12" - 5.34".
Precipitation in July was above the normal range: 7.48" with a normal range of 4.62" - 7.36".
Precipitation for April, May, and June was above the normal range: 17.66" with a normal range of 8.52" - 14.64".
Precipitation for May, June, and July was above the normal range: 22.30" with a normal range of 10.96" - 17.92".
Precipitation for the previous year (July through June) was within normal range: 57.82" with a normal range of 51.53" - 58.06".
Precipitation for the previous year (August through July) was above normal range: 61.04" with a normal range of 51.53" - 58.06".

CITY OF NEW BERN
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
City Representative: Matt Montanye, Director of Public Works
(mailing) P.O. Box 1129, New Bern, NC 28563
(shipping) 1004 S. Gienburnie Road, New Bern, NC 28562
mo ntanyemg newbernnc.gov
252-639-7501
The undersigned representative of the City of New Bern does hereby authorize:
Scott Davis and/or
Alexander P. (Sandy) Smith
of Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27604
sdavisC7axiomenvironrnental.org, 919-696-3045
ssmithCc)-axiomenvironmental.org, 919-270-9306
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and
acceptance of jurisdictional determinations, permits, or certifications and any and all
associated standard and special conditions attached.
In addition, permission for access to city property and city -maintained or designated
easements is granted to the above contractors/agents and to agents of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, N.C. Division of Water Resources, and other natural resource
agencies for the purposes of jurisdictional area verifications, permitting coordination,
etc. pursuant to city-wide drainage feature repairs.
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and
accurate to the best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature:
Date: 09/00