HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0045128_Wasteload Allocation_19960418NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NCO045128
PERMITTEE NAME: Alamance County Board of Education
FACILITY NAME: Sylvan Elementary School
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Modification
Major
Minor -1
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 0.003 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
100 %
1
Comments:
SEE-,-IY.Gc{'e,P W1nA.�e. S (tAE•` )
HA} n1a L o.9 t —e waor ape %.+�Iw
ALM oz.o9 .99uo 3.Feck coueCALult 5o, pa{wyo Wvz.s„?
rmrx.. r.o �7n.o . p .J70.�o •, p 3ti�0:0 '
RECEIVING STREAM:Canc Creek
Class: C-NSW
Sub -Basin: 03-06-04
Reference USGS Quad: D 21 NW (please attach)
County: Alamance
Regional Office: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 2/29/96 Treatment Plant Class: I
Classification changes within three miles:
Requested by: Susar Wilson (%VA, Date: 3/6/96
Prepared by Date: 1,5 p a,r,,, kofj,
Reviewed by: Date:
��9�
kA11� _
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
SGp
3 ll 5v
g'�SCe
Drainage Area (mil. ) t e , L Avg. Streamflow (cfs): vi •0
7QI0 (cfs) O.-L. Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 9,-. 30Q2 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic
InstreamMonitoring: N0-r KgSautesa
Parameters
Upstream Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
Summer
Winter
Characteristics
BOD5 (m )
30
30
NH -N (mg/I)
3
moN,to2
D.O. (mg/l)
TSS (mg/i)
30
g
F. Col. (/100 ml)
ZO o
�o
pH (SU)
6-1
6 -
Res 1 Oelrai...
p
Gn0zt E L
MO"Aor_
0&0 a1 •
P s C 1✓
0war40
r,)Dqrt
idCPL
M—l'ta Y'
C°G
w-ONrt 0
,n6,,j r,
77
Comments:
k
MEMODATE: t
TO: ��
�(k SUBJECT:
--
S-t2�1M � AN� ntt 9
�s�
t C�! i (Z ` UCS T c� J� (�1 C (�
LAM MAN i � e1E � �pL �
r o 00 P�
49
n �t��'`'` Cow-Lf�NcE
(' P,
ALSO -�Mk
From: S""'j W '
�STATE4 �Department of Environment,
h Carolina Nort
t Health, and Natural Resources 09 printed on Recycled Paper
Alamance County'Schools. ;
P.O. Box 358
609 Ray Street `• : 1=
Graham, North Cadre 27253 f
Telephone: 910-574y 6 4' 2 -y
Fax: 910-570- 64 B.S•':r
H.m Rogereo
January 12 ,1996
Mr -David A. Goodrich, Supervisor
NPDES Group
State of North Carolina =� _
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management,
Subject: Change. in. Draft Permit;
Permit :Nd.:' NC0.0451 :8 -
-
Sylvan Elementary. - r
:r.
'Alamance County :Y
Dear Mr .Goodrich: "r
This . is a reply to our draft- NPDES permit far. SylVan,Elementary'. -i
No. NCO045128. I wish to change -monitoring f1Qw. from 0014 MGD :tt}
.0030 MGD. Due to the fact that our well .flow meter is note a' -true . ;
representation of our Efflunent flow. Due - to ' the `fact that the house
across the street is used by the cast in. Spring of year,When. the'_ show`-,
SWORD OF PEACE is being put on•,tOhe house has -its oji septic.
Also due to irrigation of lawn, cleaning ect,.:-. t
We are installing a Dosing counter in dosing tank toobtain
accurate flow at this discharger s
When reveiwing old permit from 1974, The flow was
with 200 students,. We now have 225 students. The sand bed i.s 165Qsq.• .ft
The school has a cafeteria, We are allowed by- caculation Hgatpe=
student,Nhich is 2700 gpd. This puts 1.6ga1 per sq ft.t:,
If you hqve . any more, quest ions or -comments ' please coritact ' me_
at 910- 570-6482. H.M.Ro_ gers, Alamance Coounty Schools_
H . M. Rogers . (ORC,
r L N c't
cc: Mr.Charles 0. Jefferies=-
_--
Associate Superintendent an equal oppo4unit}r empbver - > �
Staff Review and Evaluation
NPDES Wastewater Permit
FACILITY INFORMATI
Facility Sylvan Elementary School
NPDES No. NCO045128
Design Flow (MGD) 0.00146
Facility Class I
C7vHo4
STREAM CHARACTERISTICS
Stream Name
Cane Creek
Stream Class
C NSW
Drainage Area (mil)
15.2
S7Q10 (cfs)
0.2
W7Q10 (cfs)
-
30Q2 (cfs)
-
IWC (%)
1.12
Proposed Changes
Parameters Affected
Basis for change(s)
Monitorin& Fr encies
Amm /WET limit
Limit N PME
Compliance Schedule:
Special Condition(s): STANDARD CONDITION FOR DISCHARGES TO NSW WATERS.
Permits & Engineering Comments:
Recommend renewal of existing limits. Due to high dilution at the point of discharge, no NH3-
N/tox choice will be given. Previous information indicates that this is a Class I facility and
permit monitoring frequencies reflect this classification. No instream monitoring is required.
The facility has had several flow violations in the past year.
t
Preparedby:
--
Regional Office Evaluation and Recommendations:
u
i
Y-- : =:4�2
01,0
June 30. 1995
MEMORANDUM:
TO.: Jav,cas
THROUGH: Steve Maunev. Water ouality Supervisor /o}�
FROM: Jim Johnston
SUBJECT: Permit Renewal. Alamance County Schools
Altimawhaw-Ossipee E.S.? NCO045161
Western High School, NCO045144
Western Middle School, NCO031607
B.E. Jordon E.S.. NCO045152
Sylvan E.S. NCO045128
The above schools in Alamance County have requested permit
renewal. No changes have occurred at the sites since the last
staff reports. Attached are copies of the previous staff reports.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
It is recommended that the permits for the above schools be
renewed in accordance with Division policy.
CC: Tech. Services
County Health Dept.
Central Files
WSRO
Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
RBe�T "E8 APR o 8 19,
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request # 8456
Sylvan Elementary - Alamance County Board of Education
NCO045128
Domestic - 100%
Existing
Modification Stream Characteristic:
Cane Creek
USGS #
02.0968.8425
C - NSW
Date:
1986
03-06-04
Drainage Area (mi2):
15.2
Alamance
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
0.2
Winston - Salem
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
0.7
Wilson
Average Flow (cfs):
14.0
3 / 11 / 96
30Q2 (cfs):
D 21 NW
IWC (%):
2.4 %
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Increase in flow designation due to reassessment of plant capacity and does not constitute an
'actual' increase in discharge.
Facility currently measuring discharge using water bill records. As the watering of an athletic field
is included in the water bill, this method is not very accurate. ty Previous flows were used to remodel discharge at newly determined discharge c�EC E I V G D
No residual chlorine limit recommended per information given to permi".c D e p f, of F H N R
No change in limits, (other than flow) recommended. AFR - 1 1996
W st.on-Salem
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers: riS 0 n a fif I C8
A
Recon
Reviewed
Instream
Regional
Permits 8
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT BY:
Date::z mAgri. +996
Dater
Date:
Date:
APR 2 4 1996
Existing Limits:
Monthly
Average
Summer
Winter
Wasteflow (MGD):
0.0014 *
0.0014
BODS (mg/1):
30
30
NH3N (m' g/1):
monitor
monitor
DO (mg/1):
-
-
TSS (mg/l):
30
30
Fecal Coliform (/100 ml):
200
200
PH (SU):
6-9
6-9
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
monitor
monitor
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
-
-
TP (mg/1):
monitor
monitor
TN (mg/1):
monitor
monitor
Temperature (°C):
monitor
monitor
There shall be no discharge of floating solids
or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
* Flow monitoring should be
conducted prior
to the wastewater treatment plant or at the effluent.
Recommended Limits:
Monthly
Average
Summer
Winter WQ or EL
Wasteflow (MGD):
0.003 *
0.003 *
BOD5 (mg/1):
30
30 EL
NH3N (mg/1):
monitor
monitor
DO (mg/1):
-
-
TSS (mg/1):
30
30 EL
Fecal Coliform (/100 ml):
200
200
PH (SU):
6-9
6-9
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
monitor
monitor
OR & Grease (mg/1):
-
-
TP (mg/1):
monitor
monitor
TN (mg/1):
monitor
monitor
Temperature (°C):
monitor
monitor
There shall be no discharge of floating solids
or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
* Flow monitoring should be
conducted prior
to the wastewater treatment plant or at the effluent.
Parameter(s) affected: Limits Changes Due To:
Flow re -assessed plant capacity
Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
x No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: not required
Downstream Location: not required
Parameters:
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demoystrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes i, No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes _ No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.
P
9
a
Ne--$ fibb °s
p Tu 1+
8/ V r!•V � � d
a
4`
P
�.� p�runrt NawmAllp wavta (Amw bEEV 5tRxN(hlrNcd, bu+ tt•� P-¢ ttt R�vESi� p,�
SON Fr,Pd,- f�Du� lmLuljo�, hC.t,"l INC2=fQ--,C rN IIOW, bur t\.E 2htFt� C&PAU}l
way -tu b� 1p(WFt- -tl.N..l pcevlais(? PE�t—ftk ) T
-Nc.z� P(ouA�., Npo 414 Not
" J
qN " f0Ctc1A, lout/ ItiICR.P%YCs r rt Who 'tl,E E.xIStrN��
ouJS_
-TW-- %P61N P(At) NL:,tv, - add(&Ss A{ V-S W"C-Vja;rt Ox SMall GAtbcl Qal C-s 1rkC-
+1v3 CI E. 40v NtR(ZK pJt5) - * raxtUlti OVA5 yule( No c1.41NC- boat t JXVlet Ibe la65()Nedk
SUMMER
PAPER FLOW
INCREASE
----------
MODEL RESULTS ----------
Discharger
:
SYLVAN ELEMENTARY - ALAMANCE
COUNTY
Receiving Stream :
CANE CREEK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The End D.O.
is 6.20
mg/l.
The End CBOD
is 0.80
mg/l.
The End NBOD
----------------------------------------------------------------------
is 0.27
mg/l.
WLA
WLA
WLA
DO Min
CBOD
NBOD
DO
Waste Flo
(mg/1)
Milepoint
Reach # (mg/1)
(mg/1)
* (mg/1)
--
(mgd)
---------
Segment 1
------
5.81
---------
0.85
------- ----
2
----
Reach 1
45.00
90.00
0.00
0.00300
Reach 2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
SUMMER
PAPER FLOW
INCREASE
I Seg #
I Reach #
I Seg Mi I
D.O. (
CBOD I
NBOD I
Flow I
1
1
0.00
7.13
2.98
3.02
0.20
1
1
0.10
6.80
2.79
2.69
0.21
1
1
0.20
6.54
2.61
2.40
0.21
1
1
0.30
6.34
2.45
2.14
0.22
1
1
0.40
6.21
2.31
1.92
0.22
1
1
0.50
6.11
2.17
1.72
0.22
1
1
0.60
6.05
2.04
1.54
0.23
1
1
0.70
6.02
1.92
1.38
0.23
1
1
0.80
6.02
1.81
1.24
0.24
1
2
0.35
6.02
1.81
1.24
0.24
1
2
0.85
5.81
1.34
0.71
0.26
1
2
1.35
5.95
1.02
0.42
0.28
1
2
1.85
6.20
0.80
0.27
0.30
i Seg #
( Reach # I
Seg Mi I
D.O. 1
CBOD I
NBOD I
Flow I
Seg #
I Reach # I
Seg Mi I
D.O. I
CBOD
1
1
0.00
7.13
2.98
1
1
0.10
6.39
2.63
1
1
0.20
5.88
2.33
1
1
0.30
5.54
2.07
1
1
0.40
5.33
1.84
1
1
0.50
5.22
1.64
1
1
0.60
5.18
1.47
1
1
0.70
5.20
1.31
1
1
0.80
5.26
1.18
1
2
0.35
5.26
1.18
1
2
0.85
5.35
0.67
1
2
1.35
5.77
0.42
1
2
1.85
6.20
0.29
Seg #
I Reach # I
Seg Mi I
D.O. I
CBOD
SUMMER
VELOCITIES WERE INPUT AT
ONE-HALF CALCULATED RATES
I NBOD I
Flow I
3.02
0.20
2.42
0.21
1.95
0.21
1.57
0.22
1.27
0.22
1.02
0.22
0.83
0.23
0.68
0.23
0.56
0.24
0.56
0.24
0.20
0.26
0.09
0.28
0.05
0.30
1 NBOD I
Flow I
*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger SYLVAN ELEMENTARY - ALAMANCE COUNTYSubbasin
Receiving Stream CANE CREEK Stream Class: C
Summer 7Q10 0.2 Winter 7Q10 0.7
Design Temperature: 26.0
ILENGTHI SLOPE) VELOCITY I DEPTHI Kd I Kd I Ka I Ka i KN I KN I KNR I KNR I SOD I SOD I
I mile I ft/mil fps I ft Idesigni @20 Idesigni @20 Idesignl @20 Idesignl @20 Idesignl @20 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Segment 1 1 0.801 8.301 0.028 1 0.72 1 0.27 1 0.21 1 0.48 1 0.421 0.48 10.30 1 0.48 1 0.00 1 0.00 10.00 1
Reach 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Segment 1 1 1.951 5.101 0.027 1 0.83 1 0.27 1 0.20 10.28 1 0.241 0.48 1 0.30 1 0.48 10.00 10.00 10.00 1
Reach 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
Flow
1 CBOD
1 NBOD 1
I
cfs
1 mg/l
1 mg/l I
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste 1
0.005
1 45.000
1 90.000 I
Headwatersl
0.200
1 2.000
1 1.000 1
Tributary 1
0.000
1 2.000
I 1.000 I
* Runoff 1
0.040
I 2.000
1 1.000
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste I 0.000 I 0.000 1
Tributary 1 0.000 ( 2.000
* Runoff ( 0.040 I 2.000 1
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile
D.O.
mg/l I
0.000
7.300
7.300
7.300
0.000 I 0.000
1.000 I 7.300
1.000 I 7.300
: 030604
J
I Cane ` , -
� �c` � s�xwcame �l i � �� ,.1 , t) ) � � i_, s l� , < v �� � � (•� ! lii � � /
�Sunu )))
vLf
y �
�.� � d � '�4 d � I. ' i i �✓ r � I Y (� i� _. <a u6 oPE,,� Ri �. �
7
J, N Niu � �I��i 1 ��� .- �J�I. �_ � ✓ paer)o,oTQla 3cn <..�
7�
- 1 .✓ /
qp J_/l �s ( i�-1., _o ! /�I 1)���.,! •JJ � i %,. I ,�� f.. �, �.: ' �I.� r..e�\', n I \.� \ f l �y 1. .,, �,� \��
j�I��h'�lI
is
V
/`ii JIA A/ I� _ ALAMANCI f0__
C AIIIAM
�V � � � � �� �� � , � ��� �� 1, j •� x� �� ��r.., � �.
.f1.0 d '1 r