20061575 Ver 1_Application_20060929

N ST~~TC 0 / w~
1
~ ~_ ::. s
~ S
~T~N~ ~NR. k'q 2 ~ ~~~
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA tiosr rFR 6
DEPAR'1"1VIENT OF TRANSPORTATION ~Mwq FRe
IVIIC~L F. EASL.EY Lrnmo TIPP
GOVERNOR SEQtETARY
September 21, 2006
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
ATTENTION: Mr. Steve Lund
Cc: Mr. David Baker
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
osisas
SUBJECT: Nationwide Permit 23 and 33 Permit Application for the
proposed replacement of Bridge No. 24 on US 19 over the
Oconaluftee River in Swain County. Federal Aid Project No.
BRSTP-19(11), TIP B-4696.
Please find enclosed a copy of the Categorical Exclusion, pre-construction notification
(PCN), permit drawings and design plans for the above referenced project. NCDOT
proposes to replace Bridge No. 24 using phased construction, on existing alignment, with
a 200-foot, two span bridge. There will be 0.001 acre of permanent impact to surface
waters due to the new bents, and 0.18 acre of temporary impact to surface waters will be
required for temporary work pads. There are no jurisdictional wetlands within the project
area. -
Impacts to Waters of the United States
The water resource impacted for this project is the Oconaluftee River. The North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources classifies the Oconaluftee
River as "C" with a secondary classification of Tr. The Oconaluftee River is located in
Hydrological Cataloguing Unit 06010203 of the Little Tennessee River Basin.
The Oconaluftee River has been labeled a High Quality Water Resource, therefore High
Quality Sedimentation and Erosion Control measures will be used on this project. Due
to the presence of trout, in-stream construction is prohibited during the trout-spawning
period of October 15 through April 15 to avoid impacts on trout reproduction.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC:
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548

Permanent Impacts: There will be 0.001 acre of permanent stream impacts to
accommodate the new bridge bents.
Temporary Impacts: There will be 0.18 acre of temporary impacts to accommodate
construction of the new bridge via temporary work pads. The pads will consist of Class
A and Class II rip rap (shown on sheet 3 of the permit drawings), and will be completely
removed once they are no longer needed. These pads are necessary to construct a bent
and to hoist the large beams into their proper location.
Utilities: Water lines in the area will be reattached to the new bridge. There will be no
utility impacts for this project.
Bridge Demolition
Bridge No. 24 was built in 1958. The structure consists of 5 spans totaling 236.92 feet in
length. The existing bridge is composed of a reinforced concrete deck and girders with a
substructure composed of reinforced concrete posts. Best Management Practices for
Bridge Demolition and Removal will be implemented.
Federally Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed
Endangered, and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of March 8, 2006, the
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists 13 federally protected species for Swain County
(Table 1).
Table 1. Federally-Protected Sneciec fnr 4wain f'nunty_
Common Name Scientific Name Status Habitat/ Last
Survey Date Biological
Conclusion
arolina northern flying s uirrel Glaucom s sabrinus coloratus E No No Effect
astern cou ar uma concolor couguar E No No Effect
ndiana bat yotis sodalis E No No Effect
S otfin chub Cy rinella (=Hybo sis) monacha T No No Effect
alachian elktoe lasmidonta raveneliana E Yes-10/2004 No Effect
ittle-wing earlymussel egiasfabula E Yes-10/2004 No Effect
oonday lobe atera clarki nantahala T No No Effect
Spruce-fir moss s ider icrohexura montiva a E No No Effect
irginia s irea iraea vir iniana T Yes- 6/29/2006 No Effect
ock Gnome Lichen Gymnoderma lineare E No No Effect
j'Gray Bat yobs grisescens E No No Effect
ald Ea le aliaeetus leucoce halus T No No Effect
og Turtle yobs riseseens T (S/A) No No Effect
KEY:
Status
E =Endangered -
T=Threatened -
T (S/A)
Definition
A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant
ponion of its range."
A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of appearance with another listed species and is
therefore listed for its protection.

Avoidance & Minimization
The construction of this project has minimized the extent of the built-upon area by using
the existing alignment for the widening. Traffic will be maintained onsite using phased
construction on the new bridge. The existing structure will carry traffic until enough of
the new bridge is constructed to accommodate the traffic. Best management practices
(BMP's) will be utilized to minimize water quality impacts. In compliance with 15A
NCAC 02B.0104(m) we have incorporated the use of BMP's in the design of the project.
The structure chosen to replace Bridge No. 24 will only have one set of bents, thus
resulting an increased hydraulic capacity, and a reduced likelihood of obstruction.
Mitigation
Permanent surface water impacts for this project are from bridge bents. Therefore,
mitigation will not be necessary.
Regulatory Approvals
Section 404 Permit: It is anticipated that the temporary impacts from the installation of
work pads in the Oconaluftee River will be authorized under Section 404 Nationwide
Permit. We are, therefore, requesting the issuance of a Nationwide Permit 33 authorizing
the temporary dewatering of the Oconaluftee River. All other aspects of this project are
being processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in
accordance with 23 CFR § 771.115(b). The NCDOT requests that these activities be
authorized by a Nationwide Permit 23 (FR number 10, pages 2020-2095; January 15,
2002).
Section 401 Permit: We anticipate that 401 General Certification number 3403 and 3366
will apply to this project. The NCDOT will adhere to all general conditions of
aforementioned certifications, and therefore are not requesting writing concurrence from
the DWQ. In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H, Section .0500(a) we are providing two
copies of this application to the North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural
Resources, Division of Water Quality, for their review. With the exception of one
property owner, this project occurs on tribal land, thus requiring a section 401 permit.
We also anticipate that comments from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) will be requested prior to authorization by the Corps of
Engineers. By copy of this letter and attachment, NCDOT hereby requests NCWRC
review. NCDOT requests that NCWRC forward their comments to the Corps of
Engineers and NCDOT.
TVA: This project is located within the jurisdiction of the Tennessee Valley Authority
(TVA). Therefore, an approval under Section 26a of the TVA Act will be required.

Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact Michael Turchy at maturchy(a~dot.state.nc.us or
[phone].
Sincerely,
~,
-~ Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
W/attachment
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ (2 Copies)
Ms. Marella Buncick, USFWS
Ms. Marla Chambers, NCWRC
Mr. Harold Draper, TVA
Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. J. B. Setzer, P.E. (Div. 14), Division Engineer
Mr. Mark Davis (Div. 14), DEO
W/o attachment
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Majed Alghandour, P. E., Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. John Williams, P.E, PDEA Project Planning Engineer

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW 23 & 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Environmental Management Director
Mailing Address: 1598 Mail Service Center
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: maturch~(a~dot.state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
III. Project Information
Page 1 of 8

Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps maybe included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project:_ B-4696, Replacement of Bridge No. 24 carrying US 19 over the
Oconaluftee River.
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-4696
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Swain Nearest Town: Cherokee
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35 28' 35.76" °N 83 19' 10.86" °W
6. Property size (acres): N/A
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Oconaluftee River
8. River Basin: Little Tennessee
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Recreation/ tourism
Page 2 of 8

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The replacement of Bride No. 24 over the Oconaluftee with a new single span brid e north
of the current structure. Earth moving equipment including, but not limited to cranes
bulldozers, etc., will be used during construction.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: To replace a functionally and structurally
obsolete structure.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs maybe included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:New bridge bents sill result in 0.01 ac
of permanent impact; 0.1826 acre of temporary impacts to accommodate construction of the
new bridge via temporary workpads.
Page 3 of 8

2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number

(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,

herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
No Wetlands

Total Wetland Impact (acres)
3
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:N/A
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on ma)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
PH 1 Oconaluftee River Temporary Perennial 90-100' 40' 0.123
PH 2 Oconaluftee River Temporary Perennial 90-100' 40' 0.0596
Bridge Bents Oconaluftee River Permanent Perennial 90-100' 3.5' 0.001

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 83.5' 0.1836
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dred 'ng, flooding, draina e, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact

Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)

Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of

Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
Page 4 of 8

6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.1826 (temp)
0.001 (ermanent- brid e bents)
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.1826 (temp)
0.001 (ermanent- brid e bents)
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 80 (temp)
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be.described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.The selected design was chosen
as it completely spans the Oconaluftee River. Temporary impacts are required to hoist the long
spanning beams into place.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 5 of 8

4
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o. enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation required.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Page 6 of 8

i
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
* I Impact I Required
Zone ,~~._~-e c ~,~ Multiplier ,,,~:~,~_,:~_
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendiculaz from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of .Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
Page 7 of 8

the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. Impervious surface will not significantly increase
as a result of this protect. Water will be controlled off of the bridge deck and will not fall
directly into the stream. NCDOT's Best Management Practices will be followed throu out the
construction of the protect.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
h~://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
Q-
-U6
Applicant/~gent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8

~~~II~T~°]C~
~~~
Permit Drawings Sheet ' of ~ 9
N~~®~
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SWAIN COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1991501 (B-696)
NEW BRIDGE BETWEEN
SR 1368 ACQUONI RD.
AND 4~(1 NORTH.
w.u aimi
SHEET 1 OF ! 10 / 20 /
'~i NOHTH CAROLINA

DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SWAIN COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1991501 (B-~(6%)
NEW BRIDGE BETWEEN
SR 1368 ACQUONI RD.
AND ~1~1 NORTH.
Permit Drawings Sheet ~ of f ~
~ SHEET 2 OF 11 10/20/0~~

TEMP, WORK
BRIDGE
NATURAL
GROUND
- - - - ---- --TEMPO-ACGES-S--FI-L-L
TOP OF TEMPORARY
ACCESS(BOTH SIDES)
ri r~i ~ c~~~ nn~
--F ~ -
105 0 1 SLOPE
CLASS I=
RIP RAP
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SWAIN COUNTY

Pennit Drawings Sheet -~ of _~
PROJECT: 8.1991501 (B-696)
NEW BRIDGE BETWEEN
SR1368 ACQUONI RD.
AND Q~41 NORTH
SHEET 3 OF 11 10/ 20/ 0~f

~ ~~
~l ~ ®1L ll.d ~ ~ 11 ® V V ~ ~~ w ~ V
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
1DARCEL N~. NAMES ADDRESSES
I TRIBAL LAND
2 CHEROKEE BAPTIST CHURCH
DB.138 PG.553
3 CHEROKEE BAPTIST CHURCH
VS
CHARLES C. BRADLEY
4 ROBERT A SAUNOOKE STALCUP
PAR 51
5 HAZEL L. SAUNOOKE
PAR 5
6 EMMA SNEED
TRIBAL LANG PAR 62
Permit Drawings Sheet `~ of `?

Permit Drawings Sheet ~ of ~ `'-

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
TIP Project No.
State Project No.
W.B.S. No.
Federal Project No
B-4696
8.1991501
33840.1.1
STP-19(11)
A. Project Description:
The purpose of this project is to replace Swain County Bridge No. 24 on
US 19-441 BUSINESS over the Oconaluftee River. The replacement structure
will be a bridge approximately 200 feet long with 87 feet clear deck width. The
proposed bridge will be slightly upstream of the existing bridge location and
3 feet higher than the existing bridge. The bridge cross section will include 8-foot
sidewalks, 2-foot curb and gutters, three 12-foot lanes, and two 14-foot lanes to
accommodate bicycles. (See Figure 2)
The approach roadway, extending approximately 380 feet from either end of the
bridge, will include 6-foot sidewalks, 2-foot curb and gutters, three 12-foot lanes,
and two 14-foot lanes to accommodate bicycles.
Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridge during construction.
B. Purpose and Need:
Bridge No. 24 includes afive-span superstructure composed of reinforced
concrete deck girders. The substructure includes reinforced concrete spill thru
end bents and reinforced concrete post and web interior bents.
Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate the bridge has a sufficiency rating of
47.5 out of a possible 100 for a new structure. The bridge is considered
functionally obsolete due to a deck geometry appraisal of 2 out of 9. According to
the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) standazds, Bridge No. 24 is
therefore eligible for FHWA's Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation
Program. The current traffic volume (16,000 vehicles per day) and the projected
future traffic volume (32,000 vehicles per day) combined with inadequate deck
geometry are the primary purpose for replacing the bridge.
C. Proposed Improvements:
Circle one or more of the following Type II improvements which apply to the
project:
1. Modernization of a highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation,
reconstruction, adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g., parking,
weaving, turning, climbing).
a. Restoring, Resurfacing, Rehabilitating, and Reconstructing
pavement (3R and 4R improvements)
b. Widening roadway and shoulders without adding through lanes
c. Modernizing gore treatments
d. Constructing lane improvements (merge, auxiliary, and turn lanes)
e. Adding shoulder drains

f. Replacing and rehabilitating culverts, inlets, and drainage pipes,
including safety treatments
g. Providing driveway pipes
h. Performing minor bridge widening (less than one through lane)
i. Slide Stabilization
j. Structural BMP's for water quality improvement
2. Highway safety or traffic operations improvement projects including the
installation of ramp metering control devices and lighting.
a. Installing ramp metering devices
b. Installing lights
c. Adding or upgrading guazdrail
d. Installing safety barriers including Jersey type barriers and pier
protection
e. Installing or replacing impact attenuators
f. Upgrading medians including adding or upgrading median barriers
g. Improving intersections including relocation and/or realignment
h. Making minor roadway realignment
i. Channelizing traffic
j. Performing cleaz zone safety improvements including removing
hazazds and flattening slopes
k. Implementing traffic aid systems, signals, and motorist aid
1. Installing bridge safety hazdwaze including bridge rail retrofit
3. Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of
grade sepazation to replace existing at-grade railroad crossings.
a. Rehabilitating, reconstructing, or replacing bridge approach slabs
b. Rehabilitating or replacing bridge decks
c. Rehabilitating bridges including painting (no red lead paint), scour
repair, fender systems, and minor structural improvements
O Replacing a bridge (structure and/or fill)
4. Transportation corridor fringe parking facilities.
5. Construction of new truck weigh stations or rest azeas.
6. Approvals for disposal of excess right-of--way or for joint or limited use of
right-of--way, where the proposed use does not have significant adverse
impacts.
7. Approvals for changes in access control.
8. Construction of new bus storage and maintenance facilities in azeas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and located on or neaz
a street with adequate capacity to handle anticipated bus and support
vehicle traffic.
9. Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and
ancillary facilities where only minor amounts of additional land aze
required and there is not a substantial increase in the number of users.
10. Construction of bus transfer facilities (an open azea consisting of
passenger shelters, boarding azeas, kiosks and related street
2

improvements) when located in a commercial area or other high activity
center in which there is adequate street capacity for projected bus traffic.
11. Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and where there is no
significant noise impact on the surrounding community.
12. Acquisition of land for hardship or protective purposes, advance land
acquisition loans under section 3(b) of the UMT Act. Hazdship and
protective buying will be permitted only for a particular parcel or a limited
number of pazcels. These types of land acquisition qualify for a CE only
where the acquisition will not limit the evaluation of alternatives,
including shifts in alignment for planned construction projects, which may
be required in the NEPA process. No project development on such land
may proceed until the NEPA process has been completed.
13. Acquisition and construction of wetland, stream and endangered species
mitigation sites.
14. Remedial activities involving the removal, treatment or monitoring of soil
or groundwater contamination pursuant to state or federal remediation
guidelines.
D. ~cial Project Information:
Estimated Costs:
Bureau of Indian Affairs $ 1,500,000
NCDOT $ 3,100,000
Total Cost $ 4,600,000
*Right of Way is being handle by the Eastern Band of the Cherokee Nation.
Estimated Traffic:
Current - 15800 vpd Yeaz 2025 - 32000 vpd
TTST - 8% Dual - 2%
The Following Alternatives were eliminated from further studies:
The no-build alternate was eliminated from further study. The no-build option
will not address the current traffic volume, the projected future traffic volume,
and the inadequate deck geometry. This is unacceptable. US 19-441 BUSINESS
is a vital link in the transportation system of this state and the Eastern Band of the
Cherokee Indian Nation.
Rehabilitation of the bridge was considered as an option for upgrading the bridge.
The rehabilitation option will not address the current traffic volume, the projected
future traffic volume, and the inadequate deck geometry. For the reason stated

above, rehabilitation does not address the purpose and need of the project.
Design Exceptions: There are no anticipated design exceptions.
Bridge Demolition: Bridge No. 24 has a superstructure composed of reinforced
concrete deck girders with asphalt-wearing surface. The substructure is
composed of reinforced concrete spill thru end bents and reinforced concrete post
and web interior bents. The maximum3potential resulting temporary fill
associated with Bridge No. 24 is 74 yd .
E. Threshold Criteria
The following evaluation of threshold criteria must be completed for Type II
actions
ECOLOGICAL YES NO
(1) Will the project have a substantial impact on any
unique or important natural resource? ~ X
(2) Does the project involve habitat where federally
listed endangered or threatened species may occur? X
(3) Will the project affect anadromous fish? ^
X
(4) If the project involves wetlands, is the amount of
permanent and/or temporary wetland taking less than
one-tenth (1 /10) of an acre and have all practicable measures a
to avoid and minimize wetland takings been evaluated? X
(5) Will the project require the use of U. S. Forest Service lands?
X
(6) Will the quality of adjacent water resources be adversely
impacted by proposed construction activities? X
(7) Does the project involve waters classified as Outstanding Water
^
Resources (OWR) and/or High Quality Waters (HQW)? X
(8) Will the project require fill in waters of the United States
in any of the designated mountain trout counties? X
(9) Does the project involve any known underground storage
tanks (USTs) or hazardous materials sites? X
PERMITS AND COORDINATION YES NO
(10) If the project is located within a CAMA county, will the
project significantly affect the coastal zone and/or any
"Area of Environmental Concern" (AEC)? X

(11) Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act
resources? X
(12) Will a U. S. Coast Guard permit be required? ^
X
(13) Will the project result in the modification of any existing
regulatory floodway? X
(14) Will the. project require any stream relocations or channel
changes? X
SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND CULTURAL RESOURCES YES NO
(15) Will the project induce substantial impacts to planned
growth or land use for the area? X
(16) Will the project require the relocation of any family or
business? X
(17) Will the project have a disproportionately high and adverse
human health and environmental effect on any minority or
low-income population? X
(18) If the project involves the acquisition of right of way, is the ^
amount of right of way acquisition considered minor? X
(19) Will the project involve any changes in access control?
X
(20) Will the project substantially alter the usefulness
and/or land use of adjacent property? X
(21) Will the project have an adverse effect on permanent
local traffic patterns or community cohesiveness? X
(22) Is the project included in an approved thoroughfare plan
and/or Transportation Improvement Program (and is,
therefore, in conformance with the Clean Air Act of 1990)? X
(23) Is the project anticipated to cause an increase in traffic
volumes? X
(24) Will traffic be maintained during construction using existing ^
roads, staged construction, or on-site detours? X
(25) If the project is a bridge replacement project, will the bridge
be replaced at its existing location (along the existing facility)
and will all construction proposed in association with the ^
bridge replacement project be contained on the existing facility? X*
(26) Is there substantial controversy on social, economic, or 0
5

Environmental grounds concerning the project? [~ X
(27) Is the project consistent with all Federal, State, and local laws
relating to the environmental aspects of the project? X
(28) Will the project have an "effect" on structures/properties
eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic Places? X
(29) Will the project affect any archaeological remains which are ^
Important to history orpre-history?
(30) Will the project require the use of Section 4(f) resources
(public parks, recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges,
historic sites, or historic bridges, as defined in Section 4(f)
of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966)? X
(31) Will the project result in any conversion of assisted public
Recreation sites or facilities to non-recreation uses, as defined
by Section 6(fj of the Land and Water Conservation Act
of 1965, as amended?
(32) Will the project involve construction in, across, or adjacent
to a river designated as a component of or proposed for
inclusion in the National System of Wild and Scenic Rivers?
F. Additional Documentation Required for Unfavorable Responses in Part E

X
X
X
Response to Question 2: There is habitat for the Appalachian elktoe and the littlewing
peazlymussel. A survey by Fish and Wildlife Associates with Assistance from the US
Fish and Wildlife Service, NCDOT personnel and NCWRC personnel in 2000 was
conducted on the Oconaluftee River including upstream and downstream of the project
area. No mussels were found. The Biological Conclusion is no effect.
There is also potential habitat for Virginia spiraea along the riverbanks of the
Oconaluftee. There is no Virginia spiraea growing in the project azea. The Biological
Conclusion is no effect. The project was resurveyed in 2004 with the same outcome.
Response to Question 7 and 8: The Ocanaluftee River is classified as C Trout waters
and portions of the river have a High Quality Water status. C trout waters are protected
for secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish and aquatic life propagation and survival,
agriculture and other suitable uses as defined by the classification. There will be an
in-water work moratorium from October 15~' to April 15~'.
Response to Question 25: The new bridge location will be slightly upstream of the
existing bridge location. (See Figure 2)
Response to Question 28:
- NCDOT will replace the stone wall and steps in front of the church building with a
stone wall similaz in style and materials to the original. The Cherokee Baptist Church
congregation has been consulted about alterations to the wall, and they would like for
the wall to be reconstructed without any steps leading from the churchyazd to US 19.
6

NCDOT will consult the Cherokee Tribal DOT in order to coordinate the design and
color of new traffic signal masts with other streetscape improvements already in
progress in the Town of Cherokee. The Traffic signal masts will be designed to
coordinate with lampposts on the new bridge, and with lampposts akeady installed in
Cherokee's Island Pazk. This commitment will contribute to downtown streetscape
enhancements already undertaken by the Eastern Band. It will also address concerns of
the Baptist Church congregation about the clutter of wooden traffic signal poles and
wires currently in front of the church complex.
Response to Question 30: A portion of the stone wall and steps located in front of the
Cherokee Baptist Church and Pazsonage will be removed during bridge construction and
related improvements to the intersection of US 19 and River Road. (See Figure 2 and
Programmatic 4(f) attached)

G. CE Approval
TIP Project No.
State Project No.
W.B.S. No.
Federal Project No.
B-4696
8.1991501
33840.1.1
STP-19(11)
Project Description:
The purpose of this project is to replace Swain County Bridge No. 24 on
US 19-441 BUSINESS over the Oconaluftee River. The replacement structure
will be a bridge approximately 200 feet long with 87 feet clear deck width. The
proposed bridge will be slightly upstream of the existing bridge location and
3 feet higher than the existing bridge. The bridge cross section will include 8-foot
sidewalks, 2-foot curb and gutters, three 12-foot lanes, and two 14-foot lanes to
accommodate bicycles. (See Figure 2)
The approach roadway, extending approximately 380 feet from either end of the
bridge, will include 6-foot sidewalks, 2-foot curb and gutters, three 12-foot lanes, .
and two 14-foot lanes to accommodate bicycles.
Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridge during construction.
Cate orical Exclusion Action Classification: (Check one)
TYPE II(A)
X TYPE II(B)
Auvroved:
r
`G`7~
Date
~~'~ ~ ' OS
Date
Project Development & Env~~a Analysis Branch
For Type II(B) projects only:
Date , ~~._ John F. Sullivan, III, Division A~
`f "-`Federal Highway Administration
Yro~ect Dvelopment ~c Environmental Analysis t3ranch

PROJECT COMMITMENTS:
Swain County
Bridge No. 24 on US 19/441. BUS
Over Oconaluftee River
Federal Aid Project No. STP-19 (11)
-State Project No. 8.1991501
W.B.S. No. 33840.1.1
T.LP. No. B-4696
Hydraulics Unit, Roadside Environmental Unit, Division Foarteen Construction Office,
Structure Design Unit, Natural Environment Unit
NCDOT will adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) for "Bridge Demolition and
Removal" during the removal of Bridg3 No. 24. The maximum potential resulting temporary fill
associated with Bridge No. 24 is 74 yd .
The proposed project crosses Oconaluftee River, which has been labeled as a High Quality Water
Resource. 'Therefore, High Quality Sedimentation and Erosion Comml measures will be used on
this project.
Once construction of the new bridge is complete, the existing structure will be removed. The
approach fill will`,: removed to natural grade and the area will be ro-vegetated with appropriate
plant species.
USFWS recommended that tempon~ry fill is minimized, that no heavy equipment operates in the
stream channel, and removal of woody vegetation along the stream banks is avoided to the extent
possible.
No deck drains will be allowed to discharge dira~ly into the OconaluRee River. USFWS
recommends the roadbed and deck drainage flow through a vegetated buffer. (Note: Hydraulics
Unit and Natural Environment Unit must negotiate with Division of Water Quality at a later
phase in design to settle drainage issue on the eastside of the bridge.)
A Section 26a approval will be needed from the Tennessee Valley Authority.
NCDOT will replace the stone wall and steps in front of the church building with a stone wall
similar in style and materials to the original. The Cherokee Baptist Church congregation has been
consulted about alterations to the wall, and they would like for the wall to be reconstructed without
any steps leading from the churchyard to US 19.
NCDOT will consult the Cherokce Tribal DOT in order to coordinate the design and color of new
traffic signal masts with other streetscape improvements already in progress in the Town of
Cherokee. The Traffic signal masts will be designed to coordinate with lampposts on the new
bridge, and with lampposts already installed in Cherokee's Island Park. This commitment will
contribute to downtown streetscape enhancements already undertaken by the Eastern Band. It will
also address concerns of the Baptist Church congregation about the clutter of wooden traffiic signal
poles and wires currently in front of the church complex.
Categorical Exclusion
Green Sheet
September 2005
Page 1 of 2

~ - ,~
Division Resident Engineer
Natural Resources Conservation Service has commented that the Oconaluftee River is classified
as C Trout waters. The following will be implemented to minimize impacts to their habitat:
~^ In-stream work and land disturbance within the 25-foot buffer zone are prohibited during
the trout spawning season of October 15 through Apri115
~• Where concrete is .used, work will be accomplished so that wet concrete does not contact
the stream water.
~• Grading and back filling should be minimized. Tree and shrub growth should be retained
if possible to ensure long term availability of shoreline cover for game fish and wildlife.
^ Under no circumstances should rock, sand, or other materials be dredged fiom the stream
channel except. as required for the construction of the bridge piers.
• • Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetations should be planted on all bare soil within
15 days of completion of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion
control.
• Guidelines for Construction Adjacent to Trout Waters will be applied to this project.
Categorical Exclusion
Green Sheet
September 2005
Page 2 of 2

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION
FINAL NATIONWIDE SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION AND APPROVAL
FOR FEDERALLY-AIDED HIGHWAY PROJECTS WITH MINOR INVOLVEMENTS
WITH HISTORIC SITES
F. A. PROJECT STP-19 (11)
STATE PROJECT 8.1991501
T. I. P. NO. B-4696
Description:
The purpose of this project is to replace Swain County Bridge No. 24 on
US 19-441 BUSINESS over the Oconaluftee River. The replacement structure will be a
bridge approximately 200 feet long with 87 feet clear deck width. The proposed bridge
will be slightly upstream of the existing bridge location and 3 feet higher than the existing
bridge. The bridge cross section will include 8-foot sidewalks, 2-foot curb and gutters,
three 12-foot lanes, and two 14-foot lanes to accommodate bicycles. (See Figure 2)
The approach roadway, extending approximately 380 feet from either end of the bridge,
will include 6-foot sidewalks, 2-foot curb and .gutters, three 12-foot lanes, and two
14-foot lanes to accommodate bicycles.
Traffic will be maintained on the existing bridge during construction.
1. Is the proposed project designed to
improve the operational characteristics,
safety, and/or physical condition of the
existing highway facility on essentially
the same alignment?
YES NO
X ^
2. Is the project on new location?
3. Is the historic site adjacent to the
existing highway?
4. Does the project require the removal or
alteration of historic buildings,
structures, or objects?
5. Does the project disturb or remove
archaeological resources which are
important to preserve in place rather
than to recover for archaeological
research?
^ X
X D
^ X

~-
A ~
6. a. Is the impact on the Section 4(f) ^
site minor (i.e. no effect, X
adverse effe
b. If the project is determined to have
"no adverse effect" on the historic ^ X
site, does the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation object to the
determination of "no adverse effect"?
7. Has the SHPO agreed, in writing, with the ^
assessment of impacts and the proposed X
mitigation?
8. Does the project require the preparation
of an EIS? ^ X
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED AND FOUND NOT TO BE FEASIBLE AND
PRUDENT
The following alternatives were evaluated and found not
to be feasible and prudent:
1. Do nothin¢ Y~~ No
Does the "do nothing" alternative:
(a) correct capacity deficiencies? ^ X
or (b) correct existing safety hazards? ^ X

or (c) correct deteriorated conditions? ^ X
~
and
(d) create a cost or impact of ^ X
extraordinary measure?
2. Imyrove the highway without using the
a~acent historic site
(a) Have minor alignment shifts, changes

in standards, use of retaining walls,
X a
etc., or traffic management measures
been evaluated?
(b) The items in 2(a) would result in:
(circle, as appropriate)

(i) substantial adverse environmental
impacts
or (ii) substantial increased costs
o (iii unique engineering,
transportation, maintenance, or
safety problems
or (iv) substantial social, environmental,
or economic impacts
or (v) a project which does not meet
the need
or (vi) impacts, costs, or problems which
are of extraordinary magnitude
Yes No
3. Build an improved facility on new ^
location without using the historic site. X
(a) An alternate on new location would
result in: (circle, as appropriate)
i) a project which does not solve
the existing problems
or (ii) substantial social,
environmental, or economic
impacts
or (iii) a substantial increase in
project cost or engineering
' difficulties
and (iv) such impacts, costs, or
difficulties of truly unusual
or unique or extraordinary
magnitude
MINIMIZATION OF HARM
Yes No
1. The project includes all possible planning
to minimize harm necessary to preserve the X ^
lustonc integrity of the site.
2. Measures to minimize harm have been ^
agreed to, in accordance with 36 CFR X
Part 800, by the FHWA, the SHPO,
and as appropriate, the ACHP.

3. Specific measures to minimize harm aze
described as follows:
- NCDOT will replace the stone wall and steps in front of the church building with a
stone wall similar in style and materials to the original. The Cherokee Baptist Church
congregation has been consulted about alterations to the wall, and they would like for
the wall to be reconstructed without any steps leading from the churchyard to US 19.
NCDOT will consult the Cherokee Tribal DOT in order to coordinate the design and
color of new traffic signal masts with other streetscape improvements already in
progress in the Town of Cherokee. The Traffic signal masts will be designed to
coordinate with lampposts on the new bridge, and with lampposts already installed in
Cherokee's Island Park. This commitment will contribute to downtown streetscape
enhancements already undertaken by the Eastern Band. It will also address concerns of
the Baptist Church congregation about the clutter of wooden traffic signal poles and
wires currently in front of the church complex.
COORDINATION
The proposed project has been coordinated with the following (attach correspondence):
a. State Historic Preservation Officer see attachment
b. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation MOA filed
c. Property owner see attachment
d. LocaUState/Federal Agencies see attachment
e. US Coast Guard not applicable
(for bridges requiring bridge permits)
SL'rMMARY AND APPROVAL
The project meets all criteria included in the programmatic 4(f) evaluation approved on
December 23, 1986.
All'required alternatives have been evaluated and the findings made are clearly applicable
to this project. There aze no feasible and prudent alternatives to the use of the historic site.
The project includes all possible planning to minimize harm, and the measures to minimize
harm will be incorporated in the project.
All appropriate coordination has been successfully completed with local and state agencies.
Approved:
`f ~-1 /~ 1 ~~j ~ ~v
Date ~ ,~M r, Planning & Env' ental Br h, NCDOT
r`-b t ~ ~
;:~
~~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~'~i
Date ~~.,,~ivision Administrator, FHWA

~~~TM
;;` '~t~ NORTH CAROLP,vA
!/~ DEPARTMENT OF T~tANSPORTATION
~^ ~ PROJECT DEVELOPbtENT &
~,, ~~~`~i EwIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
~' ,~ SWAL~I COUYtY
REPLACE BRIDGE 24 ON US X41
OVER OCONALUFTEE RIVER
B-4696
Figure 1
i ~ :~
' 162
i ti
s
v~
d~
•~
r ~ u
~
'~ r

~J
~
~
~ .~.

~ `
-~
`~
~ 2 .
~ `
a ~. ( ~,pVHI

'
_~
' t i
.\ '
'
~ O
G
~,
'
~
.~
_ '~ -.
._` ~
163

`
.
`

~ ` ` v ~ ,

`
r^ ~ ~r
t.:

`
'.
r J ~
1 A C K S O N ~~/
_ ~~ ~ . ~ ~~ f O~rl Kk06
1 I ~f ` Blf~ ' ~ t9 7° ~-'or
~ r
,~ aa~
~ Eta ~ ' ~! ~
~
19 >1
- A~
~ ;~ ~

lRY50N r
~
lo
roe
i
~,
.
,o
5
4. wt,~~~ p
~~ato~ ~a -
c h
s
j
[NOUN ~ "r's•a `~C
l l l ,..,1
~~-
RA7

Bob Blankenship
chairman
Yellowhill Township
C.cu-r-y Blythe
Vice-Chairman
Wolttown Township
Tnbal Council 14embers
Teresa Bradley 1~IcCoy
Big Cove Township
Richard Panther
Big Cove Township
Jim Owie
Birdtown Township
Albert Crowe
Birdtown Township
Marie L Junaliiska
Painttown Township
Tommye Saunooke
Painttown Townstup
Glenda Sanders
Snowbird tY
Cherokee Co. Township
Brenda L. Noruilie .
Snowbird &
Cherokee Co. Township
Dwayne Jackson
Wolfetown Township

Zhe~{onornble lean ID.7orres, PriruxpalG~ief
2~e ~farrorub(e Carn~!!7 Crrnv~ vice-(Iuef
18 June 2003
Danny Childers
Environmental Office
Post Office Box 455
Cherokee, NC 28719
RE: Oconaluftee Bridge Replacement Archaeological Assessment
Dear Mr. Childers,
In accordance with Section 106 of the NHPA, the EBCI THPO must
evaluate all projects involving ground disturbance when using federal
funding or when projects are proposed on federal lands. The Bridge 24
replacement in Cherokee at Highway 19 and the Oconaluftee River falls
under the Section 106 review process. Bridge 24 is located in Swain
County, NC and was completed in 1940. As Bridge 24 exceeds 50 years in
age, it is potentially eligible for inclusion on the National Register Of
Historic-Places (NHRP). This office has reviewed the NC SHPO site files
and-found no state registered sites within the Area of Potential Effect
(APE). It is the EBCI THPO opinion that there are no previously
unidentified sites located within the APE, given the ground disturbance
that occurred during original bridge construction. During multiple Elder
Advisory Board meetings, Elders were asked about the bridge
replacement, and though many had stories relating to the bridge, there was
no mention of a specific event or person that could bolster the historic
significance of the bridge. Given this information, it is the EBCI THPO
opinion that Bridge 24 in Swain County, NC is not eligible for inclusion
on the NHRP. Further, this office sees little probability that there will be
any adverse effect to cultural resources within the APE. Please direct
further inquiries to Russell Townsend or Myself at 497.1594.
Thanks for your time,
- ~~./
Brian K Burge
EBCI stafl"archaeologist
88 Council House Loop • P.O. Box 455 • Cherokee, iV.C. ?8719
Telephone: [phone] or 497-7000
Telefax: [phone]
Alan B. Easley
Yellowhill Township

,.
Federal did # STP-19(11) TIP # d-4696 County: Swain
CONCURRENCE FORM FOR ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 24 on NC 19 over the Oconoluftee River,
Swain County
On June 28, 2005 representatives of the
© North Cazolina Department of Transportation (NCUOT)
® Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
North Cazoiina State Historic Preservation Office (HPO)
^ Other
Reviewed the subject project and agreed
^ There are no effects on the National Register-listed property/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse.
^ There are no effects on the National Register-eligible property/properties Located within
the project's area of potential effect and listed on the reverse.
~~ JL `~i4(° s
® There is an effect on the National Register- propet#y/properties located within the
project's area of potential effect. The property/properties and the effect(s) are listed on
the reverse.
^ There is an effect on the National Register-eligible propertyiproperties located within the
project's area of potential effect. The property/properties and effect(s) are listed on the
reverse. -
Signed:
Representative, NCDd'T ~ Date
FHWA, for the Division Administrator, other Federal Agency Date
c~~ ~ ~~~ ~ a`~ d ~
Representative, HPO D to
' - ~~ ~/~~/as"
State Historic Preservation Officer

~ X
Federal.4id # STP-19(11) TIP # B-J696 ~ County: Swain
Properties within the area of potential effect for which there is no effect. Indicate if property is
National Register-listed (NR) or determined eligible (DE).
N/A
Properties within the area of potential effect for which there is an effect. Indicate property status
(NR or DE) and describe the effect.
The Cherokee Baptist Church and Parsonage (DE) will be affected by the project.
A portion of the stone retaining wall and steps located in front of the property,
which are original to the 1948-1954 church complex, will be removed during bridge
construction and related improvements to the intersection of US 19 and River Road.
A metal traffic signal pole will be placed at the SE corner of the intersection,
replacing wooden poles currently located at the SE and SW corners.
Reason(s) why the effect is not adverse (if applicable).
The effect is not adverse because NCDOT has made the following environmental
commitments:
- NCDOT will replace the stone wall and steps in front of the church building with
a stone wall similar in style and materials to the original. The Cherokee Baptist
Church congregation bas been consulted about alterations to the wall, and they
would like for the wall to be recogstructed without any steps leading from the
churchyard to US 19.
NCDOT will consult with the Cherokee Tribal DOT in order to coordinate the
design and color of new traffic signal masts with other streetscape improvements
already in progress in the Town of Cherokee. The traffic signal masts will be
designed to coordinate with lampposts on the new bridge, and with lampposts
already installed in Cherokee's Island Park. This commitment wilt contribute to
downtown streetscape enhancements already undertaken by the Eastern Band. It
will also address concerns of the Cherokee Baptist Church congregation about the
clutter of wooden traffic signal poles and wires currently in front of the church
complex.
Initialed: NCDOT ~ C FHWQ~~f HPO

` ` I ~

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
.asheville. Vorth Carolina '_3301
December 3, 2001
~~Is. Pamela ivi. Boaze, President
Fish and Wildlife Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 241
Whittier, North Carolina 28789
Dear Ms. Boaze:
Subject: Proposed Replacement of Bride 24 over the Oconaluftee River on U.S. 441 in Swain
County, North Carolina
We received your letter of November 8, 2001, requesting a list of endangered and threatened
species that might be affected by the subject project and any other concerns we may have. Our
comments are provided in accordance with the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 661-b67e), and Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531-143) (Act).
We are interested in the design of the new bridge and would like to review the design plans when
they are available. The new bridge design should include provisions for roadbed and deck
drainaje to flow through a vegetated buffer before reaching the Oconaluftee River. This buf'rer
should be large enough to alleviate any potential effects from the run-off of storm water and
pollutants. The bridge design should not alter the natural stream and stream-bank morphology or
impede fish pass~Any piers or bents should be placed outside the bank-full width of the
stream. The bridge and approach should be designed to avoid any fill that will result in the
damming or constriction of the channel or floodplain. If spanning the floodplain is not feasible,
culverts should be installed in the floodplain portion of the approach to restore some of the
hydrological functions of the floodplain and reduce high velocities of flood waters within the
affected area. We recommend that erosion- and sedimentation-control measures be in place
before any ground-disturbing activities. Wet concrete should never be allowed to come into
contact with the stream. All in-stream work should be scheduled during periods of low flow.
Additionally, please address the demolition plans for the existing bridge in any environmental
document prepared for this project.
oti b ~ kl~ l~k~1~~E s~yL~,

~ ,. .
We have no major concerns with the proposed action. However, given the proximity of the
project to the Oconaluftee River, we want to emphasize that stringent sedimentation- and
erosion-control measures should be implemented and strictly adhered to during all phases of
construction aot only to protect the integrity of the Oconaluftee but also to protect the endangered
Appalachian elktoe (Alasmidonta raveneliana) downstream of the project area in the Little
Tennessee River. We do not have records of any federally listed species in the immediate
proposed project area, but do we have records of the olive darter (Percina squamata) and
hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis), species of,Federal concern, from the Oconaluftee
River. Also, the endangered Indiana bat (~Llyotis sodalis) is known from Swain County and
should be addressed in the assessment of this project. In accordance with the Act, it is the
responsibility of the appropriate Federal agency to review its activities or programs and to
identify any such activities or programs that may affect endangered or threatened species or their
habitats. If it is determined that this proposed construction may adversely affect any species
federally listed as endangered or threatened, formal consultation with this office must be
initiated. Thus, if appropriate habitat is available in the project area for any of the federally listed
species included on the enclosed list, surveys should be conducted before project construction to
determine if the species are present.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments. If you have any questions or
concerns, please contact iv1r. Allen Ratzlaff of our staff at 828/28-3939, Ext. 229. We have
assigned our lob number 4-2-01-076 to this project. Please reference this number in any future
correspondence concerning this matter.
Sincerely, 7
--~ ~/ ./ ;
Brian P. Cole
State Supervisor
Enclosure

~ ~
~o
rm ~
z
z~
~m
c~
~~ ••
'~ m
^D 3
" -~
`mo
C
DD
--I ~
m~
69ti4~ti~ .. -
\ •~
~\ \\ \\
\\
~.\ ~3
\`\\ \
f~@ ~ \\
O D 4 O ~, ~\\ \ N~
~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~~
~ € ~~ © III \\ ~\ \ \\~.
;~ \~~
~ \ \ l ~ s ~~+~ \
I \ \~
\ n n ~
0\ 1 q
d l~N ~ ~ ` ~
N `\\
{ ~~
\ \
~~ _ `a
Q ~115~~_ .J'1
~~ yLl y
~ ;~
\ ~~
1~ 9
~ / ~ r
~ ~<
~~ L r
=.1~ r~, r
q
SO' 3~ ~~ U3Nd Q10 ~ f
~~

bl~`
r.
\~ ~ .9
F~
`\~ ~. ~ ,a
i
' 9
Q~ y~i
fs ~ ~~~
~~~.
~~ ~/
~~
~ ~~°~
~~~
~~
'Y
y ~ ~ ~~x'
x
v '
N
mN
~
~~ o a
\\
~
5 ~. ~
/ m

~ NH•
l r ~
~

~ / ~
Q

V
,9 = ~ g
i
2
~
,9C ~ a gg J
~ 3~d
~

y p=
i
~g
Q I y0ro~~
-1
~m
~ \
\

~
1
~ ~
~~
FI ~ 1
1
°O '~~

~>
o~ c,v I°

p ~ JJ~
` ~
I
~
11
~ 11
/
.h ~ O

dam,+4,J ~ OSL~a~pS
f~3
.'
OpN~ ~
1
~, I x
=
d3N 331~
/ d /
1

i ~ ~ ~.
m~ :~ ~yy~]] 1
~~~,

~~ O

O r £O
-F y~4
ti
~
~ ~ b _
~ _
O I ~
~- U3M1 371la'MNQ?D ~ ~ . • ~ . ~U^- / /
~~p7~ gg41 ds /
~... --• .su~iM.o"pSppp3Bfazs - " ~ ~ ' Sppo-
,9 C 62 M.00 9C~Q'S i
/~~~
~^
A ~
^~- ~, ~ J~~ ~ I Qom/
..~-~~ ,ty'S62 IA.00.94.029 • < _ 9
~ ~ O
V m
j .Qdr . % / ~~ N
// ° 6
/ `F ~ p~
,- a + o
~ ~l ~- ~,
`~ ~ ~ ~ .r b ~ ~~
/ ° ~.v ~
~ • ze~J'~---.. „may=.
o ~~,~~~
/ NJ25977•E ~„.
~ / ~ D T~ S `_ M C 6L915 ~`~
~~./ • / a'
I ~ / a H~ OA~ ~ ~ o ~
/j e \ ~~i ~
~, / m / w So
i
\~ ~ ,d2~ ~p5 OQ
J y~~ ~~~ ~ + ~ ?~ ~
~~~Y} ~
dJt79oa~ " • ~t~Sg,H ti ~ ~ 61
aO ~ ~ ~p
Y MM
n~~~ • I ~ = S G^
z
_ ~nV~p ~ ~ O
M ~
m =~
1 ~
~+ s~ LN
g 4
7 ~~ ~ ~'
z
0

d
z
~v ~
r 3 ~I
4.
d ~
W m
~ ~z`
(p ~ QZ
i~ dj ~ y} W y M•6S.Cy~
~epF 3 W ~ d610
g ~ So ryZ4aM
~ m ~ ~ `~
4 N / W
Q
~ 6f
c~ ~ ~ a ~
~ '
0
a
51939'13"N ~^
~~ 9T.35' ~„3.GI,65.2CN
.S6'BI~.~
1
~~ 1

J
N
W
N~ O
..
.~
~~
c
S
/~;~
i ~ ' I CD ~ FJ ~t• f
a
a
-~ ~ O :. \
~ \

W
~ ~
. ~~
~

~~
~
J

~`~ 1 '13'18 ~ l
~
1
C{EE pNEp /
s`
" Ifr
NB
~1 ~
~ So3'Oh~~o °~ ~
.

u
T \.
`
1 ~ n"
~ 4
h
"t / ~
t
yry
~
O +
~' G
~
1
1 F ~
11
~~
~ I O
~~ ~
~~
F
1
1 ~ ~
~I ~ _
~ `
.
~ _~
~
~~
~31 ~
R ~ ~
~ ~ ~
\
0
\ ~~_~ ~ _
s R ~ 3b' /
/~
C P'DE ~
s ~
6' /, / ~
p fj
I,E _
N
~~
C
m
x
X V 6
Zpa
/WN O
~~
~~
~ °
~ :`
p Y
~~
~ 3 YI '~~
~b~
~~
~~ ~\~ ~
\ `\~
~~ ~ ~~ \ ~ ~
\\ ~~+ J'~\J16J ~ \
\\ ~=`~b s ~> ~
\\
~~~ \ \
~~ s
\\ ~
\\
\\
\\
~ ~~ p
~~ ~o ffi4
y f
.`e2~~srti so~
L~
/~ //N/A'/Ye~
v

4
~./ _~ ~~ ~ p,~pNNLFfEE RNEN `~
L~-~/
~ w
4
u
~,~a
^~~~~
titi
--- S
POSE 45
OID RNER ~ i0

~ S~ ~Io
z
r
~~
a
'+ `~
m
~ ~ ~~
gR ~3Zbd
\~ ~ c~ ~6 ~Ta~S,
~ \\g N
~sri " _,n6'33E W
~~s~
~\ ~
~o
~m °o
n'
3 ~ P
u r~
~ ~
I~
\ ~, \ 'I ~Z HpS~ ,
\\ \\\
\`\
\\ ~ ~ ~
\ \ w r~l
\ ~\
Q
Z

~ W
N
LL
Qa
~3
O W
~" U
~Q
w,~
<o ~~.

~ (.n
w
Y ~ ~-
oZ

'~
~ Z
W J
F

~

H ~
f
O©© O
0
~D
F-
w
w
x

69 ti j,0"
~~.
\ \
\\ \\ \\
\\
`~ \ ~'"
r
rk~ 20 Q7
® ©©~ ~, \\~ \ Nr
~i ~ \ \ ~ ~~
~ ~ \ ~ ~\
r
r) ~ z ~~ II \\ Ig ` \~ ~ \\
N
N
aN m
--i
~,
~ m ~ ~ _ \ ~ ~
~ i ~~4 ~~
~ \ ~. ~
~~y
r ~~
0
~s, 1~ ~
,o" ~ a.
-~ s~ .~a ~
v34C.~L ~\ g' r ~ /1~/ ~ ~ M
w ~ / ~
p~ w ~+
t~"~
z ~~ ~ q^
\~\ ~ ;- - ~ r• ~ £s
(Y~ ~ 9 ~ ~ S a I/ ~ /, ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ 11~
q a~ I ~ ~ ~, ~ nv I $ 11
~ r ~ ~' ' ~ ~~ ~~ O I ~ I ~ 1
,~ ~ m
~ ~ o~
r I ~J~ ~ 1
\ o W t" r I ` Q ' o + ~ ~~ r O l
~ ~ ~ (~ e . ~ f ~ I o ~ a ,nom+w ~ ~o p4 SS«~°S ~ 1
M o ~ x e~, nd 331~rcpNO'p / 11
to / ' N ~ ~ UM r n., H S = / N3 1
m '
s q ~ / ~ " 81.45 '6 xs ~ ~ m ~ ~a '•~-~
v
ss
~ ~.. ~ b~ ~ ~ ~~ x
i ~
T
y ~p rrn 1~ $ ~~~~` /~~
~~( ~~c I I .~ ~ /~
ergo .E-- ,6 ~ ..~~ ,~~
4- N3NN 331.3RMH0.~0 ~}~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~1'h~ / /
r y941 us /
j~ 1
~ ~ e r
_ ,:
' ~ SE 62 ~ Soys ~
1~ ,,,~ r / ~~~jjjppp
-~-~~ ,1e'ssi w.oo,E4.o2~ ~ ~' ~ . ~i
O ~
by w SN
~ m
~v ~
„/ / ~ i~
~ ,~'~ ~ / /
3 a
~ / /l
\ \ ~ / nMaoo`(
/ a / ~ _
~ w a"
~ ~ ~ ~' /
0
~ ,~ ~
~J/ n~ ~/
z / /!
~n
V ~
\~
~ !~.

~I'
~~ 1
'77'E ~~
- ,54'16 ~~
M.41.64.815
0
~ N ~
p~ ~ ~ ~ '_
^' ~ d o
W
.dz~ S
OG
tll <I' ~
~~~'S9~q ~

0
"h
W

Z
V
~Q
sF
-~ ~ 9~ ,,
~o
rm ~ ~
z
z°
~m ~
~~
.__, ~.
mm
D3
f") ~
moTT
C N
DD
-i ~
m~
V
D
(./)
n1

~,
~~~~~
\~ ~
f
\~
\~\ \~
F~
Y'~ ~ ~ ZLSOH Z? II \ ~
-. y yoo © ~ \ a
'" II \ ~
N ~
~ ~I ~,
II
d~ s
c "= mL=
m} O
K~
m ~~ \ ,
~° ~I~~
L~ot+
~ 3.4s,v a \\ 4'
~r\J~
y4.,~~ ~ w4 ~ 4A~ ~' 1
3`p yLL~ ~r ~ l'
'~w
z ~ ~
~y ~ ~
~,
~ .-
i
j r
aIo ri' r /
q /
. //
~SS Ny 3.1
s~ d3Nd mo ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~,
am auA" ' ~, `~ §
o ~ ~
~... ~ ~y
... ...
r~~ E-
~_ N3Ntl 331!?T'N0.70 ~ G.- ~I
'~ c
~ r
1~'
0~~
„~cP'o6
p
~L

g3
tiis'e~
~\
~ ~
~~ ~
N~ ~~
z ~~\
~ \\
~ ~~
~ \\
\\~
~, ~~`~
~` ~~~~~ ~ ~s ~~
\~ \\
Ig \ ~\
z ~ \ ~ \ ,. N
a
~ \ ~ ~ ~
\ ~wF j ~~4
~` ~ ~ ,:

S
a"
~n

~ $:
,
i
0111 I r
0 ~~~
~X~~x
o ~~
n r ~'X
N
r
~ ~:
~o ~ ~
I \ ~ A
q ~ \
A
\ add
'~ a I ~~~~ ~\\
`~ vw
~ ~ ~1
I ~ ~
a
~o ~
O ~ ~J
~ \
~ ~ rO ~
~ ~v ~ ~
$ M~' ~
pCtiya4o5 ~ 1
N~ ~
.~' H3Nti 33JJ(M 1
i
r~
oa
~~~ i
O ~ ~M~

~1~
/ J~
~ ~
/ / y
7N
~m
Y ` ' O
N
H
'~ .~ 9
I
_ NJ` 977'E ~..~
~~..~,~ .54'16
M.41~64.8~5
0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
9 ~ r
i'p~ b
N
~ ~ ~...~ O
/ ~
w
~vt 6~pS
N~~L ~.
dQ
~.
~tll 4P C/]
1J•59•w `.Y
N
"h
W
/ O

WALL s
G~
~~
,,~~ iE~r
,~
~/~ ~2,
~ esr ~
f ~b
~ NP 1
' Mr s • I 1
F ~ MrL
~ CONC
i _ ,
~/~
I
~ ~
~~ ~~
fiF ,,.T~ 1,P5`,V
~~RCH N~~10N ~2 P ~~M
~~ P
J~ aOxG _
LEGEND
,Z
0
~, ~ gsT cuRB
D ~
`~ ~
~' DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILE IN SURFACE WATE
. r
Permit Drawings Sheet ~ b of ~ 5
1 g
`~
~ss
z ; ~ GLI
~° `~~
w
. 1 E~ ~ \ 0 25 ~ '=
R C CAU AY ~
M N
1 ~1 26 ,F ~ 50 z
~~ \ SCALE: I'= 50' HORIZ.
1
1 40' R
v , 1 ~,
~>
`' ~ ~ ~
~ ' ~ ^~
IG \ ~ , 0` WD SIGN ON ~
~~
~w

fV
O
W
~~o

WAIL 1
~/
~/
Y MT
i~
~ ~~
s
~~
~~ ~
1 ,~
~ ~1 ~
t ~ ~\
~~ ~
.I 1 \
MTL SIGN ~
CONC S~ n ,`~
~ /
i~
~~.
RR~~pJEO Of
I
1E
Mj /
F
c\ <I
~~ -r-
223A7 NI~
RECENj~~ o BST o
REMOVED ~~
~ ~
~ ~
~ E,~ Fir
~~ Pr R L~
WE% 5 CON
~- ~ ,~"
q8. C .
~~\~
BST I ~
~T CURB 9
2 POLE /L s
~~ w
~n
LEV 1948.
W/LT
SLAB
F ~~'
STEPS
S C SLAB
3O° CMP
z
oW
~~ ~ rD1

3'18~O
NI9°13'18"E
~ 3.19' ~
\`
o
~, ~\~ o
'A~ q
1' ~~~ ~
~ss
~~
\ ~G
\ O
o
1 ~
~ \\
\ \
. 11
~ ~~~
~i
OLD BRIDGE HW ~ \
~~
•, ` \~ ~
RARY~ROCK Y IG \~~
~~--y
a~ Nv„
LEA I
i~'~ " F TANK
~fiE O~ ° ROCK S~ N C RC SP ISRFD & OCK WALL m ~ BRIGE.~
~~ ~a6 . SP CN~RCN o ~ OCK , ~ ~ TRIBAL, 25, Q ~
1 ~~ ~ \ iDW LAND I 199 O9°~ ISPBUS
~` v ® CoEPS O N49°56'13'"W D'•m IS' CMP S~8°11' P,~ N,,, ~ ROCK
r ~ro o~,
0~ S Q wm
B, ~~G EIP IP ~ oo ~
~ORCN Tc ~2 P~-P5 ~ ~ RAW LINE ti~ WD TEPS o ~~
,~1pN ~ ~ OMP --~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W~
Jp~ pX ~ P A T O --~ ~
~~ q$" RAIL F CE \p~ ~ . ~ eo ~ .
o INFLOW NOT FOUND TL SIGN 5+83.7$ `"
p N v T 06'E u.oo~ ~ 5
19 GM ~ 0 570131.10' \ \9 °~ ~
~ \
ESP ~ EMMA SNEEO
l ~ I n o ~ TRIBAL LAND PAR 62 ISFgUS
/ "NAIL L~~~l V rJ o 9 ~ r~ o
? ` ` BS J z l
~~ ~ ,GONG PAD
y
\ ~4'Wp FENCE ~
W ~8" C rn
,~ S R8
~ B S CU MP = ~,
NOTES TEMPORARY
W
FIB IN SURFACE WATER ~ ~l 11 ~ ~~ o
. ~ W I ~.
Permit Drawings Sheet ~ ~ o f ~ 3
I
w
0 25 ~ :=
rn
~ ;n
50 z
SCALE: i'= 50' HORIZ.
F
\\ C ~ M M
0' w0 SIGN oN
~ ~
\ \ PAD
V ~ eST H)
.~
\ ~ w WP W D BEC~
o ~
~ \ ~~ \
~ s ~\ ,
~~ ~~.
~~
BST
c~
~~
2

1,970
1,960
1,95D
1,940
1,930
1.920
BX •tE`JevaNon 1977Qr
~'-656561.87 f-713532.55
LOCaTED S Sf08'33' w.6993' FRrzu BL-f-=-
CHlSLED 'x fN CONCRETE SASE OF (1GHf
~O(E

.. ..
~y yy
a~lw
'
f
~
'f
.
~
.
~,~ '.' ~
4
G ~~
:~
::',
/
y
~
~
~
p
y
~
p
~~ ~
y~
wNG. IIIVWI4nt11 ~ :.;..

Cvt% ~tlPli~ b3CiklCE' :-: -- :::28~7Ef~5:!
Oi'fA
.......... COPhG:f I::.~
.....
.. i:::~SGQtRS::::::

GVfR ...
...............:
rd1"YiG: ~f6TATQ1f ::::: + .......
.:::: gA7~3: FF:::
r '9 Era%oNan N
~J y~::1:
/{7!I'[:
Bbr '3-Elevorlarr /94913'
N-65040722 E=7!425010
-L- S"C,4TlON w+f3.~2 r3so' Rlcrrr
STANDARD TYA BRASS IIONUYENT STMIPfO
•RUD :ie.
,BN •7 E~d~7a! 1446B0
Nr656b5~43E~714.4ft
8'SFVIff S~ rN 6+4Sf:AF..2CT~AF'LE_.~'REE
1AORGT 1!fll~lC! N0. iH!!f N0.
8-4696 5
AOlD1MAY ClflGN NMDRAINCS
~~
Permit Drawings Sheet ~? of 1,~
:::..:............................................
SNEE7'':4 FfIR 1?CAN YIE-T~
1
.............................................
......................................
~ fAR :PIJINYI~IY
.............................................................................
8af'SEier+Atdlf9~t92'': ;[
N=657;OIQ49 E=7[4,!65:39
-! 51"Ai'lAV lZ+i3~': 46E,ffT'
8'SP1Xf-SET rN BA$f .DF ~0'wr1l7E Pixf
iRfF
91r;;"6 r=lev4tlAfi r9.~4.5f}' -':
V~556,r091fE~114,r9511
-L=: STATrOar r5~$525.. 35T.OQ'RIGIiT.__
9'SPIKE:;St!'IIN BASEOEI~ SYCAY17R~
EREf :::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::[::::::::::::::::;
6Y •2 Elevdrm !94595`
N~562g812 E=7/4,x5251
'-L- STA710N 16+7212' 4812~lilGh7
CHiSt,ED 'x'ON END 4F SE CORNER pF-
sBR/D3E
~:
1

w
M VJ»
~~
iD,ow
~'c°'Q
ov=
N-p{~~~:
WPM
m!i
o~«
911
i
Q0;
U
01
ti
O~
O
O
V
V
See Sheet 1-A Far Index of Skeels
See Sheet 1-B For Conventional S mG~ls
~, !
l y "'" Ra
~' r~'`~
1380 ~ ,,/388
~ --Cherokee
1e ~ a~1 1
l Project Limits
\ ~5
44t 1~~. to
_`
VICINITY MAP
~~~~~ ~~ l~M ~~~~ ~1.~JLO~~~1V
1~~~~~~~1~1 ®lF ~~~~~~~~
SWAIN COUNTY
LOCATION BRIDGE #24 ON US 19 OVER THE OCONALUFTEE
RIVER IN CHEROKEE
TYPE OF WORK GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, STRUCTURE, RETAINING WALL,
CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALK LIGHTING AND SIGNAL UPGRADES
~~
Y6
~
L I
~ ~
__ __ __ -I I~-

} ~ ~ ~~~
I
PROP. RETAINI ~ ~ ~
'
w•
~Y
~,,
I'
z 1`
0
o ~l
~
_
.j"~ \

TO s~ _--'
uSµ, U5191_' ~~_
'~~~~ /a
BEGIN TIP
PROJECT 8-4696
-L- STA. 10 + 42.00
BEGIN BRIDGE
5ta.14 +15.00 -
END BRIDGE
Sta. 16+15.00 -L-
~,
_ ~ ,~
~~~ ~
~~ ~ ~
0~4~~
~~ ~ ~f
~' ~ *+~
rtm nan mm~ .wwq n¢ cm mr.LL
~~
•~• 8-4696 1
nan notta. ra.wxrxi .~.~
33840,1,1 STP-191 PE
33840.2.2 STP-19 1 RM' 6 U11L
33840.3,2 BRSTP-191 CONSTRUCTION

srA. 2a+oo.oo
c1~Bar~ D~ABrnr~uT of TaANSroRTATION
GR9PIilC SCALES
50 25 D 54 1
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
~' ~ PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
V 20 10ww0•' -- 20 ..' 40
DESIGN DATA
ADT 2ooa = 1e,2BO ~d
ADT 2025 = 33,800 vpc
DHV = 25 °6
D = 65 %
T= 1096•
V = 20 MPH
" TTST 296 DUAL 8X
PRpJECT LENGTH
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT 8-469d =0.143 Mi•
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT i3-469d =0.036 Mi.
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-469d =0.161 Mi•
Prepared In lle 0(flCe d,
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
1000 Binh Bide Dr., NC, 770!0
7007 arenm,iRD aracmClrtoxs
RIGHT OA WAY DAT1I; JAMES SPEER. PE
August 13, 2002 iH00i®`
LBTf1IVG J>.9TE: _ JOHN C. LANSFORD. PE
JANUARY 16.2007 ' ~ ~BQi~`
ma I~
JiYDRAUZres ENGDIIESR
ROADWAY DESIGN
JOVGD~ffi8R
4
END TIP
PROJECT B-4696

sanuc 1mNOia avuuaou aia
DIVISION OF ffiGHWAYS
STATE OA NORTH CdROLWA
men r~nar >ovcmo~ rt
B[rRa~u oP a~r~1r aT~+AD1s
I BuBSau of nmrAU AFAADLS I
- - ~.._..... o aw.uavaw.~. Mra ~

A
m
DATUM DESCRIPTION
THE DJCKJZED LTp9DpxTE SYSTEM IfYEUPFO FDR THIS PA31ECf
IS BASED OE iNE STATE PLANE L>kYd71MATES ESTABLTS,fED @
AC7pf FDR KMIYENT '1}21GP5 101-
wfi H NARM • MAD 1993/95 STATE PLAYE GRID DaWD1MAlE5 ~
AG4THIMG 65GYA(I9RB>tTn, EAST1AfP7I11613nn
THE NERa6E LTWBIMED GRID F,CTOR USED Ox TN15 PR3IELT
RripMD TO GRID) Lk U49!Y9215p
THE MCfAYBERi GRID BEM/AC AYD
ILCIilZED Id1120MfA( 6R7UN D15TMCE FRDY
~ez+,sPS lal • ro {• naxw rowzao is
55D~emsz•r xa,l2srr
NL L1MEM DIMEMSfOrS ARE LGCMlZEO xORIZ0Tf4 0lSTAECES
VERfTCAt DATUM USED IS xAVp Bg
~T -
-Y- PT Sto. l3+)176
~~ -L- POT 510.10+0000 / % /
~~'/A.~ ,/~ ro ~
/ / ~ tbJ4~
PRDP,
~// bfe~
o ~~
^yh / C~ y0 ~
0
dO ~t f ~ ~~~x, r
/ ~~ ~ G/R
+1201-[- ~ ~1
TABAL LAID ~ ~ & CAP t~
/ PAR N035
t
© /
t~~ S/ ~
/ ///fi j ~~~/ /
%~'~ __~_ PX 18]9'
~ / t/~ / a
/ ~ O
f
~~ pN
ti
-- nlaECT EEEEEENCE No. MNeer No.
-YI- POT Sto. q+00,00 I 8-4696 4
~ "r- eErNr rxa^ t~' ; AxV ENEEt No.
was - -YI- PC 510.10+1353
b CAP ~- 9b.~ ~ iT"' ~ R~WNE~HIGN HYDMxLUt3
-NTYX9Y
+,om -r- , , ' I vno?Ep1Y ROBERT A SauNOpME STU.CUP
rpE'T 71fA7 85P1KE _ _ , l u~'1¢' I •• U N P'xR 51
~SDdB$PNt ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a ` O
85A~REDxR >P~ ~'c~ ~ l © ~ ~ ~~ ? ~ 4
' ® ~ TAeu ulo
~E ~ ~ M -r-
_ ~ '- ~ ~EMM~M, ,1 1P y ~ 1 N
~ ~NxM~!r7 ~ ~ •' -Yf- PT 570.11+44.82 "~°
L 31Cri4i~ 56256'OBi IB0.76• ~`s7) =. ~~ 1
it
-~~_- _ m 1
1 COAL MALI ~ ~a6. ~
I 1 ~ „ x ~ r ~~ s"L \ ~Pe..,~ ^' 1 1 -Yl- PC Slo.1l+83,51 SEE SH€ET 5 FOR PROFIE.ES
• ~ PROP.T xP ` P
~`' 3 -r- ' ~ ',, s b rzlXxretf GATES -`--~'`~~0°E PAVEMENT
Y + Nay PK © TAek uro REMOVAL
AG1NG AREA _ ~ ~ © ~~ . BEG/N G~vSf. BRIDGE
i ~c ' p ~r3 • F"uxn~wu~t w/RauxG r1:1 \ ~ -YI- SIO.13+2000 APPROACH
~ GIN ~ rPp Y -L ll.lllD (p~U! SLABS
I ~J((,,y.~RNUNG COl ~L7 ~ '.1~ ANP `"
-Y- 12+JC.Q7 73'jT7-~ Sue ~ ~ a
~ r ~- \ . ;:. SEE SHEETS S-ITHRU
~ -o
$3 •~ BEGIN SLAB ~ END SLAB
bYl ue~E Es~~ 0, _ _~ ~\~ ~ FOR STRUCTURE PLANS
+ -rl- Sta.16+25,86 _L-
` r PEOEtRtY o ~ c STEPS .,~ /P b AP -YI- PT STO.I4+09.62
`BEGIN BRIDGE
1 . ` E~"v~ ~4~E0 x ~ s""~ t0.1q+15.00 -L- _, ~° '~~, -rl_ 4
^ ~ ~" ~' ~' "P 15+00 ~on0 - P~xc~
~ y rP b c \ ~ -rl- -L- POC 570. A+0654= ew
`9.E~~ ~~c ; ~ ~, ~ wm~ - -YI- POT Sto.14+82,27 +00
m~
F \ ~ B'sP1XE END PAfiP,z•if
,. -
^ ;„
I r ..._,:._ ._ :.: ~ +bm -(- 6~ANPEU ~OEWAU( _
xsr _::-:.~-~-°__...,.~ ., R a; ,95wKE Sta0t50-E-
5W
Drwc.x
\ _ .. R ~ , , ~; -.' R O 5200'.
I oLO axmct, ,a ~ _ _ HAZEL L.SAIMIOOAE
1 ,~,,.,~® END BRIDGE ,
utt •L rE~ a r ++sTS ~~ + . ` Px xSAT POS
P
q c y 1 \ ,a
/EY \ ~ I 1 C ~ ,. ~"~NF. ~ n \ ~ \ ~. '~D S~LMR • ~ ~ 5 CV~.
~~~ /.
~~~~
i
i
E
~E Ex,ST,
TReu1
Leal
CAR I
IP b CAP `
~ T t~ °' xAA
M;,. T ~w ~2 tR 6 9-P~S+ 2v.7?' y _y_ 1
~~ ~ Qf•~t18j"79'O"0' PN n
C- PC Sto. N+7753 PK -Y- PT Sto. r5+4827
BEGIN STATE PROJECT 8-4696 -c- Poc Sla,2+15.49 = ; P
-L- POT Sto.10f42.00 -r- Por Sto. r3+88.3r ~:
'~ -r -Y- POT Sic.16+0').01
1~
Qi TAeu L1wAO -Y- PC Sla.14+6954 ~rgSpETLL~LI.O•
© CFEROMEE BAPTIST CENIRCN pB,2~ fG• Aso:
oa us PGSSS END C0N57.
GERONEE BAPi15T CTMMN;x x7o•n•r"
GIARLES G BRADLET
® iRBLL~LANp P~ 62
SKETCH OF PAVENENI' IN RELATION
6'SIDEWALK 8'SIDEWALK
2'-EC&G~ ~ 2D'h
r-s cac~
6' SIDEWALK 8' SIDEWALK
BEGIN CONST,
-Y- PDT Sto.10+Gbl
.q7 -r-
IP
is es~
TABAL LAEYE
LONG BLANMET TRACTX
rA

E10.162 ~
~
O
r-e cac
-L-
s cBc
6' SID!
y - A'D ~SiEPS i IWCM ~ ~~- - ~t 1'
I ~ o;
+85D7
~
3
r
im m~
\
~
• ~ xE
5
P
~ \
I
1 \ 1 ~T~IIAD~PE~BZ Cpq
'
Z ~ 85r 1
1 I R
F ,
~
ATT
p
~ ~COxc

e p
P
\ ~ FPhCC Y
I m
~ ~
a
~~ ~ '1
~P~ I
` ~ ,
~~
8
bg
m
Px
Px

P157o /5+0174 PI S7o 12+491/ Pt Sto /5+1455 Pt Sto b+7924 P/ Sto 12+97,41
D • 5118'377' ERTI D • 44)'2!2' 271 ~ = 69'23'505' ELT! ~ = 616' C6B(171 ~ ° 1536'05.4'([71
D = 8'29' f1T D = 3' 49'ND' D - BSD$' 505' D = 446'28,7 D • T 20' 442'
L =604.49' L = 125.38' C • 7873' L = 13129' L - 226,01'
T = 3242!' T =6273' T • 450r T • 6571' T • I13B0'
R =67500' R = !,50000' R •6500' R • 120000' R - 78000'
SE = 0025 SE = vARSEE PLANS SE = vAE?,SEE PLANS SE = vAR.SEE P1ANS
Ro - Nr
krR
\ ~
16,1 ~

1.
- PT Sta (! X21 ~D ~'c c
-L-
COQ yh
~ coxc.xxL 5D00'
A
~4
""\~~\
~, ~
\ ''
\~' ~~ • xy
•°y ~ \
.~~ \
0
iR6AL LAND
7~ U$ 441 1704 SR 1366
244 b LO 0 ~ L6 183
4~4~BU5.~ 3~ r S~ 14IBUS.,
5 5
-~
W SR 1360 2004 vpd Iln 100'eS
2025 vpd (in I00's1
w;o