HomeMy WebLinkAbout20131200 Ver 6_Harmon Dairy MY4 Report_Feb2024_RD_20240206
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project
2023 MY4 Documentation Report
Polk County, North Carolina
USACE # SAW-2013-02262
DWR# 20131200 v6
06/27/2023 11:16
Data collected:
June and August 2023
Submitted on:
February 6, 2024
Prepared for: Prepared by:
Tryon Equestrian Partners, LLC ClearWater Environmental
2659 Sandy Plains Road An EnviroScience Company
Tryon, NC 28782 145 7th Avenue W; Suite B,
Hendersonville, NC 28792
Introduction
Tryon Equestrian Partners (TEP) received authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) 404 Permit (Action Id. No. 2013-02262) dated September 14, 2017
and a N.C. Division of Water Resources (DWR) 401 Water Quality Certification (Project
No. 13-1200 V6) dated November 16, 2018 to impact streams for the construction of the
Tryon International Equestrian Facility (TIEC). Compensatory mitigation for impacts to
streams is described in the mitigation plan for the Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project
(Phases 1 and 2) (Wildlands Engineering Inc. and Clearwater Environmental Consultants
Inc. 2017).
This annual monitoring report documents the fourth year of data collection for Phases 1
and 2 of the Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project (Site). The Site is comprised of two
phases totaling 7,256 linear feet of stream and will provide 5,005 credits of stream
mitigation. The site is located in Polk County. A map of the project vicinity (Figures 1 and
2) as well as the phases and types of mitigation (i.e. restoration, enhancement,
preservation) is included in this report (Figure 3).
The success of stream stability and woody vegetation plantings will be evaluated for 7
October 24, 2016 (USACE 2016). The applicant will monitor the required areas for 7 years
and report the results annually to USACE and DWR. The streams and buffer will be
protected in perpetuity by a Conservation Easement that will be held and monitored by
Polk County Soil and Water Board.
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page i
Monitoring Year 4 Report
February 6, 2024
Table of Contents
Introduction ............................................................................................................................... i
1.0 Project Background ...................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Project Location, Setting, and Directions ͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵ 1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives ͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵͵ 1
1.2.1 Project ObjectivesPhase 1 ...................................................................................... 1
1.2.2 Project Objectives- Phase 2 ....................................................................................... 1
2.0 Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach ........................................................ 2
2.1 Site Protection Instrument ................................................................................................ 2
2.2 Project Structure ............................................................................................................... 2
2.3 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data ..................................................................... 3
3.0 Performance Standards ..................................................................................................... 4
3.1 Channel Stability and Morphology .................................................................................... 4
3.1.1 Dimension .................................................................................................................. 4
3.2 Hydrology ......................................................................................................................... 4
3.2.1 Bankfull Events ..................................................................................................... 4
3.2.2 Continuous Flow ........................................................................................................ 4
3.3 Vegetation ........................................................................................................................ 4
3.3.1 Woody Stem Plantings ............................................................................................... 4
3.4 Visual Assessment ........................................................................................................... 4
3.4.1 Encroachment ............................................................................................................ 4
3.5 Schedule and Reporting ................................................................................................... 5
4.0 Methods .............................................................................................................................. 6
4.1 Channel Stability and Morphology .................................................................................... 6
4.1.1 Photo Documentation ................................................................................................. 6
4.2 Hydrology ......................................................................................................................... 6
4.2.1 Bankfull Events .......................................................................................................... 6
4.2.2 Continuous Flow Monitoring ....................................................................................... 6
4.3 Vegetation ........................................................................................................................ 6
4.4 Visual Assessment ........................................................................................................... 7
5.0 Adaptive Management Plan ............................................................................................... 7
6.0 Monitoring Year 4 (MY4) Data Assessment ...................................................................... 8
6.1 Hydrology ......................................................................................................................... 8
6.2 Visual assessment ............................................................................................................ 9
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page ii
Monitoring Year 4 Report
February 6, 2024
7.0 Corrective Action Plan ......................................................................................................10
7.1 Modification of Fence Lines .............................................................................................10
7.2 Signage installed to the conservation easement boundary ..............................................10
7.3 Revision to Conservation Easement Boundary ................................................................11
7.4 Beaver and Dam Removal ...............................................................................................12
7.5 Repairs to Stream Channel..............................................................................................13
8.0 Areas of Concern ..............................................................................................................13
9.0 References .........................................................................................................................17
List of Figures
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 USGS Topographic Map
Figure 3 Project Components Map
Figures 4.0-4.5 Current Condition Plan View (CCPV) Maps
Attachment A: Recorded Conservation Easement
Attachment E: Visual Assessment Photographs
Attachment F: Areas of Concern
Attachment G: Records of Communication
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page iii
Monitoring Year 4 Report
February 6, 2024
1.0 Project Background
1.1 Project Location, Setting, and Directions
The site is located in the Piedmont physiographic province (NCGS 2004) in Polk County,
North Carolina. The site is accessed from NC Highway 9 in the town of Green Creek
(Figure 1 and Figure 2). The site is bordered by Mary's Branch to the west, and streams
on the site are unnamed tributaries (UT) to Mary's Branch, which drains to the Broad
River (HUC 03050105).
To access the site from Asheville, take Interstate 26 East for 36 miles to Exit 67. Follow
US-74 East toward Columbus. Take Exit 167 and turn south onto NC Highway 9. After
approximately 7 miles, turn right onto Harmon Dairy Lane. Harmon Dairy Lane ends at
the dairy. The project reaches are located to the west of the dairy barns.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
1.2.1 Project ObjectivesPhase 1
The resource functions of the
stream restoration project address needed improvements to the watershed in several
ways. The existing stream at the site was degraded due to prior channelization, habitat
alteration, excess sediment from bank erosion, limited riparian buffers, and livestock
trampling. The project addresses these impairments and improves watershed functions
by restoring approximately 1,126 linear feet of an unnamed tributary (UT) to Mary's
Branch. The primary goal of the stream restoration project is to return the project reach
to a stable, well vegetated, and naturally functioning condition. Specific stream restoration
objectives include:
improving bank stability,
enhancing aquatic and terrestrial habitats,
removing invasive exotic plant species, and
establishing more robust and wider vegetative buffers and installing livestock fencing
around these riparian buffers.
1.2.2 Project Objectives- Phase 2
The stream
restoration project addresses needed improvements to the watershed in several ways.
The existing streams at the site were degraded due to prior habitat alteration, excess
sediment from bank erosion, limited riparian buffers, and livestock trampling. The
proposed project addresses these impairments and improves watershed functions by
restoring, enhancing and preserving 6,039 LF of four unnamed tributaries (UTs) to Mary's
Branch. The primary goal of the stream restoration project is to return the project reaches
to stable, well vegetated, and naturally functioning conditions. Specific stream restoration
objectives include:
improving bank stability,
enhancing aquatic and terrestrial habitats,
removing invasive exotic plant species,
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 1 of 17
Monitoring Year 4 Report
February 6, 2024
stabilizing upland gullies
establishing more robust and wider vegetative buffers and installing livestock fencing
around these riparian buffers.
2.0 Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach
2.1 Site Protection Instrument
A Conservation Easement (CE) on the property is held by the Polk County Soil and Water
Conservation District (SWCD) to permanently protect the improved aquatic habitats and
riparian buffers and restrict future activities that might otherwise compromise the functions
and services of the aquatic resources (Attachment A). The permanent conservation
easement recorded January 23, 2017 extends at least 50 feet beyond the top of both
banks on all UTs. Within the conservation easement, the riparian buffers are planted with
native trees and shrubs to provide post-construction bank stability, erosion control and
riparian habitat enhancement. All site protection instruments require 60-day advance
notification to the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and the NC Division of Water
Resources (DWR) prior to any action to void, amend, or modify the document. No such
action would take place unless approved by the Corps and DWR.
2.2 Project Structure
The project is implemented according to the 2017 Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project
Mitigation Plan (Mitigation Plan). The Mitigation Plan consists of two phases proposing a
combined 7,256 linear feet of stream to provide 5,005 credits of stream mitigation. An
overview map of the phases and types of mitigation (i.e. restoration, enhancement,
preservation) is included in Figure 3. Below is a Summary Table for Projected Mitigation
Credits for Phases 1 and 2 (Table 1). Phase one consists of Restoration and
Enhancement II on the UT1 to Mary's Branch. Phase II consists of Restoration,
Enhancement I, Enhancement II and Preservation of UT2, UT3, UT4 and UT5 to Mary's
Branch. Both phases were constructed simultaneously and with final earthwork and
planting completed in 2019.
Table 1: Credit Summary Phase I and II
Stream Reach Approach STA STA End Proposed As-Mitigation Total
Begin Reach Built Credit Potential
Length Length Ratio Credits
Phase I
UT1 1 Enhancement II 1+66 3+18 152 1,247 2.5:1 61
UT1 2 Restoration 3+18 13+83 1,065 1:1 1,065
Phase II
UT2 1 Preservation 0+01 4+06 405 -- 10:1 41
UT2 2 Enhancement II 4+06 7+90 384 -- 2.5:1 154
UT2 3 Enhancement I 7+90 22+65 1,475 2,325 1.5:1 983
UT2 4 Restoration 22+90 31+28 838 1:1 838
UT3 1 Enhancement II 100+00 100+48 48 -- 2.5:1 19
UT3 2 Enhancement I 100+48 112+33 1,185 -- 1.5:1 773
UT3 3 Preservation 112+33 115+62 329 -- 10:1 33
UT3 4 Restoration 115+62 124+82 920 1,037 1:1 920
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 2 of 17
Monitoring Year 4 Report
February 6, 2024
UT4 -- Preservation 1+14 3+61 247 -- 10:1 25
UT5 -- Enhancement II 1+00 3+33 233 -- 2.5:1 93
Total Stream Mitigation Credits (Phase I) 1,126
Total Stream Mitigation Credits (Phase II) 3,879
Overall Stream Mitigation Credits 5,005
2.3 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data
Table 2: Project History
Project Component Date Completed
Final Mitigation Plan (Phase I and II) August 3, 2017
404 / 401 Issued September 14, 2017 and November 16, 2018
Final Design - Construction Plans March 1, 2018
Construction January 2019-May 2019
Bare Root / Live Stake Plantings May 2019
Baseline Data Collection Activities July-August 2019
As-Built Report and Record Drawings June 2020
Corrective Action Plan January 8, 2021 (Updated March 2022)
MY1 Vegetation Monitoring August 2020
MY1 Geomorphic Monitoring September 2020
MY1 Invasive Plant Management September and November 2020
MY2 Geomorphic Monitoring July and August 2021
MY2 Vegetation Monitoring September 2021
MY2 Invasive Plant Management September 2021
MY3 Geomorphic Monitoring August 2022
MY3 Vegetation Monitoring September 2022
MY3 Invasive Plant Management Summer 2022
MY4 Visual Assessment June and August 2023
Table 3: Project Contacts
Designers Wildlands Engineering Inc.
Construction Contractors Baker Grading and Landscaping Inc.
& SM Soil and Water Solutions, LLC
Planting Contractor Baker Grading and Landscaping Inc.
& SM Soil and Water Solutions, LLC
Seeding Contractor Baker Grading and Landscaping Inc.
& SM Soil and Water Solutions, LLC
Seed mix source Ernst Conservation Seeds and Green Resource
Nursery Stock Supplier Dykes & Son Nursery
Monitoring Performer ClearWater Environmental
Vegetation Management SM Soil and Water Solutions, LLC
Surveyors Ben Patton Land Surveying, PLLC
& Associated Land Surveyors & Planners, PC
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 3 of 17
Monitoring Year 4 Report
February 6, 2024
3.0 Performance Standards
In accordance with the provisions in CFR Title 33, "performance standards that will be
determine if it is
developing into the desired resource type, providing the expected functions, and attaining
any other applicable metrics".
Success criteria were defined in the 2017 Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project
Mitigation Plan (Mitigation Plan). For each defined success criteria, quantitative (e.g. bank
height ratio) or qualitative (e.g. observations of fine sediment deposition on the
floodplain), data is measured throughout the monitoring period. Year-to-year
comparisons for the various parameters will allow adaptive management to be
implemented early in the monitoring period, if necessary, to reduce the risk of widespread
problems.
3.1 Channel Stability and Morphology
3.1.1 Dimension
Riffle bank height ratios (BHR) shall not exceed 1.2. Changes in BHR shall not
exceed 10% in year-to-year comparisons.
Entrenchment ratio (ER) for riffles in reaches where ER is corrected through design
and construction shall be no less than 1.4. Changes in ER shall not exceed 10% in
year-to-year comparisons.
3.2 Hydrology
3.2.1 Bankfull Events
At least 90% of the stream bed and banks shall remain stable through four bankfull
events, occurring in separate years, during monitoring years 1 through 7.
3.2.2 Continuous Flow
Continuous surface water flow must be documented for 30 consecutive days at any
point during the monitoring year.
3.3 Vegetation
3.3.1 Woody Stem Plantings
Density of 320 live, planted stems/acre at year 3; 260 live, planted stems/acre at
year 5; 210 live planted stems/acre at year 7.
Trees must average 7 feet in height at year 5 and 10 feet in height at year 7.
No more than 50% of a plot stem count shall be a single species.
3.4 Visual Assessment
3.4.1 Encroachment
100% of fencing and signage to remain intact.
No encroachments shall be made on the easement.
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 4 of 17
Monitoring Year 4 Report
February 6, 2024
3.5 Schedule and Reporting
Monitoring reports will be submitted to USACE and DWR by December 31 of each
monitoring year. Reporting requirements vary based on the monitoring year. Years 4 and
6 do not require cross sectional surveys, or vegetation monitoring of
temporary/permanent plots, unlike Years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Based on the (NCIRT;
"Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update), the
monitoring reports will include the following:
Project background which includes project objectives, project structure, restoration type
and approach, location and setting, history and background
Map of project approach and structure
Map with monitoring features and any problem areas indicated
Assessment of the stability of the stream
Annual photographs of monitoring features
Assessment of vegetation
Assessment of hydrology
Recommended maintenance or corrective actions
Any other observations from visual assessment such as indications of encroachment or
wildlife
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 5 of 17
Monitoring Year 4 Report
February 6, 2024
4.0 Methods
The ecological criteria for monitoring are linked to project success performance standards
established in the Harmon Dairy Stream Restoration Mitigation Plan (2017) and
discussed in Section 3.0 of this document. Evaluation of project success utilizes industry
standard methods described in detail below. Project success will be evaluated annually
for 7 years per the proposed guidance set forth by the North Carolina Interagency Review
Team's (NCIRT) "Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation
Update" - October 24, 2016 (USACE 2016).
4.1 Channel Stability and Morphology
4.1.1 Photo Documentation
Photographic reference points (photo-points) were used to visually document stream
conditions and include both a downstream facing photo and an upstream facing photo at
each photo reference point. Photo-points were established at 30 stations along the
entirety of the project streams. All photo-points were recorded with a sub-meter accuracy
Trimble GeoXT GPS device and monumented with a PVC stake. The photographer will
make a reasonable attempt to capture the same perspective in each photo-point location
annually.
4.2 Hydrology
4.2.1 Bankfull Events
Crest gauges were installed on riffle cross-sections XS3, XS6 and XS10 will be visually
inspected to document the occurrence of bankfull events. Photographic documentation
of recently deposited rack lines was recorded as indicators of bankfull flow events.
4.2.2 Continuous Flow Monitoring
Streamflow stage will be monitored to document 30 days of continuous flow using a
continuous stage recorder. An automated level-logger will be set to record every 2 hours.
Evidence of channel flow will be documented with a photo and the stream level will be
manually recorded at each data download.
4.3 Vegetation
Vegetation monitoring was conducted during the As-Built Monitoring and will be
conducted in post-construction monitoring years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Both Permanent
Vegetation Plots (PVP) and Temporary Vegetation Plots (TVP) were established. PVPs
will be monitored in utilizing methods established by the Carolina Vegetation Survey-EEP
Level 2 Protocol (Lee et al., 2008) and the 2016 USACE Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Guidance. For all monitoring plots all woody stems, including exotic and invasive species,
were recorded. Exotic/invasive species will not count toward success of performance
standards.
A total of seven permanent vegetation plots (PVP) and five temporary vegetation plots
(TVP) were established within the 14.14 AC planted area. Locations of PVP and TVP
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 6 of 17
Monitoring Year 4 Report
February 6, 2024
were chosen in the field to capture the heterogeneity of the species composition and
spacing within the planted area. Permanent vegetation plots were established by
choosing a random origin point, with standard 10 meter by 10 meter square with plants
located on an XY axis. The vegetation plot corners have been marked and are
recoverable either through field identification or with the use of a GPS unit. Reference
photographs were taken at the origin looking diagonally across the plot to the opposite
corner and will be repeated each monitoring year. Individual PVP data recorded will
include woody stem identification, height, density, vigor, damage (if any), and percent
survival. Planted woody stems will be marked during assessment as needed based on a
known origin so they can be found in succeeding monitoring years. Mortality will be
determined from the difference between the baseline year's living planted stems and the
current year's living planted stems.
2
Temporary vegetation plots (TVP) are, using a circular or 100 m plot. These temporary
plots will be reestablished in different and random locations throughout the planted
conservation easement in monitoring years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. These locations will be
indicated on plan view maps for the corresponding monitoring assessment year.
Temporary vegetation plot assessments will document the number of stems, species
type, and stem height within the plot. Please refer to the Current Condition Plan View
(CCPV) Figures 4.0 through 4.5 for the permanent and temporary vegetation monitoring
locations.
4.4 Visual Assessment
Visual assessment will be performed annually to determine locations of exotic and
nuisance vegetation, and locations of any fence damage, vegetation damage, or
boundary encroachments. Any areas of concern will be mapped and included in the
annual monitoring report.
5.0 Adaptive Management Plan
Maintenance of the newly constructed channels and all structures associated with the
restoration would be accomplished by Tryon Equestrian Partners (TEP) if the monitoring
parameters for restored streams exceed the range of natural variability established during
the 7-year monitoring period. Replacement planting would be performed by TEP if stem
counts fall below 320 stems per acre during the first 3 years, 260 stems per acre through
year 5, or 210 stems per acre through year 7. If any portion of the mitigation project fails
to meet the specified performance standards in a monitoring year, the reason(s) for this
failure would be determined and a corrective action plan (which would include proposed
actions, a schedule, and monitoring plan) would be prepared. TEP will also install and
maintain the livestock fence for seven years. The landowner will be responsible for
maintaining the fence thereafter if the adjacent land uses include livestock. If it is believed
that corrective action to a problem area is not warranted, the corrective action plan would
state the reasons. Continued monitoring of the problem area may be required.
Project maintenance would be performed as described above. If, during the course of
annual monitoring it is determined the site's ability to achieve site performance standards
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 7 of 17
Monitoring Year 4 Report
February 6, 2024
is jeopardized, the applicant would notify the Corps and DWR of the need to develop an
Adaptive Management Plan. Once the Adaptive Management Plan is prepared and
finalized the applicant would:
Notify the Corps and DWR.
Revise performance standards, maintenance requirements, and monitoring requirements
as necessary and/or required by the Corps and DWR.
Obtain other permits as necessary.
Implement the Adaptive Management Plan.
Provide the Corps and DWR with documentation of corrective action. This report would
depict the extent and nature of the work performed.
A Corrective Action Plan dated January 8, 2021 was submitted to the Corps/DWR for
review. Areas of Concern (AOC) were updated March 19, 2022 and again in Fall 2023
following site visits with the Army Corps of Engineers. TEP hired SM Soil and Water
Solutions to implement the Corrective Action Plan and address AOC on-site. This work
was temporarily put on hold October 17, 2022, due to a landowner dispute. Invasive plant
control has been implemented in 2020, 2021 and 2022.
6.0 Monitoring Year 4 (MY4) Data Assessment
MY0 baseline data collection was conducted in July-August 2019. The fourth annual
monitoring assessment (MY4) was conducted in June and August 2023. The Site will be
monitored for a total of seven years, with the final monitoring activities scheduled for 2026.
6.1 Hydrology
Bankfull events were recorded during MY4 at all three crest gauge stations. Signs of
perennial flow were observed throughout the monitoring reach. Crest gauge readings
from June 26 and August 4, 2023, are included in Table 10 below:
Table 4: Crest Guage Data
Location Date Observed Crest Gauge Reading
UT1 Crest Gage at XS6 August 4, 2023 0.70 ft
UT2 Crest Gage at XS3 August 4, 2023 0.90 ft
UT3 Crest Gage at XS10 June 26, 2023 0.35 ft
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 8 of 17
Monitoring Year 4 Report
February 6, 2024
Monitoring device installed on 3/3/2022
®
A HOBO continuous flow monitoring device was installed in UT3 Reach 2 during MY3.
The device was installed on March 3, 2022 and set to record the water level every 2
hours. Data from the device was collected on August 25, 2022. The data showed that the
reach had perennial flow throughout the deployment of the device. A record of continuous
flow data is included in this report as Attachment C. Visual monitoring of this reach
confirmed strong baseflow in this reach during the MY3 period.
Data from UT3 Crest Gage at XS10 was collected on June 27, 2023, during the MY4
period. Within the file, data from May 28 June 27, 2023, appears to be corrupted and
displays as all negative values. Data was collected for a brief period from midnight to 6:00
AM on May 29, 2023, before the data shows negative values again by 8:00 AM the same
day. However, one final reading prior to when the device was collected on June 27, 2023,
appears to be good at 10:00 AM.
6.2 Visual assessment
The MY4 visual assessment was performed on June 27-28 and August 4, 2023.
ClearWater did note a section of two downed fences. One downed fence was located on
the southwestern most end of UT1, however no signs of livestock encroachment were
observed. The other downed fence was observed east of the downed fence mapped
location in MY3. The location of both downed fences is noted in the attached Figure 4
map set.
A beaver dam was observed west of UT1 on June 27 and August 4, 2023. This reach of
the stream is entirely dammed, and water appears to be deeper in this area. Freshly cut
vegetation was observed on both sides of the banks in addition to debarked branches
near the water.
Photographs of all permanent photo points are included in Attachment E.
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 9 of 17
Monitoring Year 4 Report
February 6, 2024
7.0 Corrective Action Plan
Efforts to close out the construction phase of the Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation site are
ongoing and are described in the corrective action plan below. Areas of Concern (AOC)
were updated in fall of 2023, following a site visit with the Army Corps of Engineers. The
corrective action plan includes the scope for remaining work necessary to meet the
construction phase requirements, including: (1) modification of fence lines, (2) signage
installed to the Conservation Easement boundary, (3) revision to the Conservation
Easement (CE) Boundary due to revised placement of stream crossing on UT3, (4)
removal of beavers/dams where dams have been built, and (5) repairs to sections of
stream channel which are eroding or unstable. AOC are outlined in Section 8.0 of this
report. Invasive plant control was implemented in 2020, 2021 and 2022. Invasive control
was not completed in 2023 but is scheduled for 2024. Supplemental planting occurred
during MY3. SM Soil and Water was contracted to complete stream repairs during MY4.
Due to access issues with the landowner, corrective action work was temporarily put on
hold. The remaining work outlined in the corrective action plan will be completed during
2024 (MY5).
7.1 Modification of Fence Lines
The As-Built Report for the Site includes sealed record drawings produced by Ben Patton
Land Surveying, PLLC dated January 23, 2017. The drawings indicate the locations of
conservation easement boundaries and installed fence lines. The placement of the fence
line on-site is farther upslope than was originally recorded, necessitating a fence line
modification.
Corrective Action: fence line will be moved down-slope to align with the conservation
easement boundary, as agreed upon between the landowners, Corps, and NCDWR
in an email dated May 1, 2023 (Attachment G). A map highlighting the area where
the fence will be shifted is found in Attachment G. This work will be performed by a
licensed contractor and professional land surveyor (Associated Land Surveyors).
Additionally, several sections of downed fence line were documented during MY4
and will be repaired with the fence line modifications. The timeline for completion of
the modification of the fence line and fence line repairs is Spring/Summer 2024.
7.2 Signage installed to the conservation easement boundary
October 24,
2016 (USACE 2016) indicates that the final as-built survey includes verification of the
installation of conservation easement boundary markers. The easement boundary
markers were not installed as described in the construction specifications.
Corrective action: signage will be installed at all conservation easement corners
specifications for as-built survey produced by Wildlands Engineering, Inc. on
March 9, 2018. Modification to the placement of wooden posts, fence lines and
metal t-posts (described above in Section 1.0) will occur prior to the placement of
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 10 of 17
Monitoring Year 4 Report
February 6, 2024
signage. The non-fenced areas of the easement will require a stakeout survey, to
be performed by a professional land surveyor (Associated Land Surveyors) to
locate and monument easement corners and boundaries. Signage will be placed
on existing installed wooden witness posts/fence posts and t-posts with additional
posts added as necessary in the non-fenced areas of the easement as described
below. The timeline for completion of the installation of signage is Spring 2024.
Technical specification for As-Built survey. Wildlands Engineering 2018:
Contractor agrees to install wooden witness posts and signage at all conservation
easement corners as follows:
Treated to a minimum of 0.4 PCF
Attach conservation easement signs (to be provided by Owner) with rust
resistant bolts, nails or screws, 4 per post
Each sign shall be placed parallel to the conservation easement boundary
line, facing away from the conservation area with the corners wrapped
around the post and secured
(Nelson tree marking paint 68 year or similar) including post top; signage
shall be installed just beneath yellow paint
Each post shall be installed plumb and set solidly in the ground to prevent
future movement
Contractor agrees to use cement if needed to add stability as follows: 40
80 lb bag of cement per post; use for unconsolidated and sandy soils where
necessary to add stability and prevent future movement; all posts must be
stable, complete and approved by Engineer
Contractor agrees to install metal witness posts and signage along all conservation
easement boundary lines (i.e., between corners) as follows:
In nonwooded areas set 6foot TPost (tops painted yellow) at no more
In wooded areas where trees on the subject property can be marked, blaze
and mark conservation easement lines. Conservation easement lines shall
be marked with conservation easement signs (to be provided by Owner)
and blazed with yellow paint (Nelson tree marking paint 68 year or similar).
7.3 Revision to Conservation Easement Boundary
A Conservation Easement (CE) on the property is held by the Polk County Soil and Water
Conservation District (SWCD) to permanently protect the improved aquatic habitats and
riparian buffers and restrict future activities that might otherwise compromise the functions
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 11 of 17
Monitoring Year 4 Report
February 6, 2024
and services of the aquatic resources. The permanent conservation easement recorded
January 23, 2017 extends at least 50 feet beyond the top of both banks on all UTs. Within
the conservation easement, the riparian buffers are planted with native trees and shrubs
to provide post-construction bank stability, erosion control and riparian habitat
enhancement. The ford crossing on UT3 was modified during construction to avoid
unnecessary tree removal (crossing 1; Figure 4.0). The extended gravel road for the UT3
crossing extending to the southwest penetrates the boundary of the conservation
easement by approximately 30 feet.
Corrective action: The ford crossing on UT3 (crossing 1; Figure 4.0) is to be
maintained in this location, therefore a modification to the 2017 conservation
easement boundary held by SWCD is necessary. All site protection instruments
require 60-day advance notification to the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
and the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) prior to any action to void, amend,
or modify the document. No such action would take place unless approved by the
Corps and DWR. Revision to the CE boundary was proposed to Steve Kichefski
(Corps of Engineers) and Andrew Moore (NCDWR) during a site visit in spring
2023 and discussed in an email from C. Riddle dated May 1, 2023 (Attachment G).
The revised boundary will be surveyed and marked, and a new property boundary
plat generated by a professional land surveyor. A draft of the new CE plat will be
submitted to the Corps/DWR and Polk County for review and approval prior to final
recording. The timeline for completion of the CE boundary revision is
Spring/Summer 2024.
7.4 Beaver and Dam Removal
Visual assessment of the Harmon Dairy Mitigation Project during the summer of 2023
revealed numerous beaver dams and recent beaver activity (e.g., beaver chews; slides)
along UT1 (see CCPV Figure 4 in MY4 report). Beaver dams were located during an initial
site visit in June 2023, and dams have since extended across a longer reach of the
channel during a site visit in Winter 2024. The dams have restricted normal hydrologic
flow through UT1 and have resulted in numerous ponded stream sections.
Corrective action: a list of eight trappers were contacted in winter 2024 for potential
beaver trapping and dam breaching. A local trapper visited the site with the project
team on January 17, 2024, and has been hired to assist in culling beavers on the
site. Dams will be breached to restore the previous hydrologic regime. Following
dam removal, conditions will be monitored to ensure bank stability along dammed
area. Beaver activity will also be monitored and further culling or non-lethal
activities (e.g., wrapping trees) will be conducted as needed to maintain stream
channel stability and protect valuable vegetation.
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 12 of 17
Monitoring Year 4 Report
February 6, 2024
7.5 Repairs to Stream Channel
Visual assessment of the Harmon Dairy Mitigation Project performed during the summer
of 2023 revealed areas of erosion and instability within the bed and banks, which warrant
corrective action. Areas of Concern (AOC) 1, 6, 40, 47, and 49-55 are outlined in Section
8.0 of this report. The stationing for each repair location is approximate and subject to
natural variation and will require adjustment in the field according to best professional
judgement of the construction engineer.
Corrective action: Repairs to Areas of Concern 1, 6, 40, 47, and 49-55 will be
completed using coir matting and live stakes to stabilize eroding banks, with
structure repairs performed as necessary by and with small earthmoving
equipment. Shaun Moore, SM Soil and Water, has been hired to complete these
repairs. The timeline for completion of the stream repairs is estimated to be during
the MY5 period in 2024.
8.0 Areas of Concern
Sealed record drawings include annotated Areas of Concern (AOC) in Attachment F.
Below these AOC are ranked as minor, moderate, or severe, and will be monitored as
maintenance. These areas were reevaluated in 2023 and
areas needing action in 2024 are highlighted in red. Specific areas of concern are detailed
below:
Table 5: Monitoring Areas of Concern (AOC)
AOC - # Location Problem Description Rank/size Action
AOC-1 UT1 Reach 2 Streambank erosion Moderate Complete; needs to
STA 4+50 and pattern adjustment be
in channel, gravel bar monitored/maintain
forming at center of ed in MY5 following
channel which is beaver dam
directing flow to removal
floodplain pools
AOC-2 UT2 STA 7+95 - Streambank erosion, Severe Complete
8+25 both banks
AOC-3 UT2 STA 12+75 Right stream bank Moderate Complete
eroding
AOC-4 UT2 STA 13+88 (Boulder Step #6): Minor Complete
Structure piping
AOC-5 : (Boulder Step #10): Minor Complete
UT2 STA 17+00 Lateral scour
AOC-6 UT2 STA Right hillslope above Moderate Maintenance
17+50-18+00: streambank is Scheduled MY5
sloughing
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 13 of 17
Monitoring Year 4 Report
February 6, 2024
AOC - # Location Problem Description Rank/size Action
AOC-7 UT2 STA 17+90 (Boulder Step #15) Moderate Complete
Structure failure
AOC-8 UT2 STA Log sill piping Minor Complete
26+63-26+74
AOC-9 UT2 STA Riffle and end grade Severe Complete
27+84-28+36 control washed out
AOC-10 UT3 STA Boulder Structure Moderate Complete
109+15: repair needed
AOC-11 UT3 STA Left stream bank Moderate Complete
116+50 - eroding
117+00
AOC-12 UT2 left Bare, eroding soil 0.02 AC Complete
floodplain patch.
AOC-13 UT2 right Bare, eroding soil 0.01 AC Complete
floodplain patch.
AOC-14 UT2 right Bare, eroding soil 0.10 AC Complete
floodplain patch.
hillslope
AOC-15 UT2 left Bare, eroding soil 0.05 AC Complete
floodplain patch.
AOC-16 UT3 right Bare, eroding soil 0.06 AC Complete
floodplain patch.
hillslope
AOC-17 UT3 right Bare, eroding soil 0.06 AC Complete
floodplain patch.
hillslope
AOC-18 UT3 Reach 2 Area of low stem 0.54 AC Complete
density
AOC-19 UT3 Reach 2 Area of low stem 0.64 AC Complete
density
AOC-20 UT3 Reach 4 Area of low stem 0.48 AC Complete
density
AOC-21 UT2 Reach 2 Area of low stem 2.19 AC Complete
and 3 density
AOC-22 UT1 Reach 1 Area of low stem 0.40 AC Complete
density
AOC-23 UT1 Reach 2 Area of low stem 0.22 AC Complete
density
AOC-24 UT2 Reach 3 Invasive Plant 0.20 AC Herbicide applied
dominance kudzu Severe
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 14 of 17
Monitoring Year 4 Report
February 6, 2024
AOC - # Location Problem Description Rank/size Action
2021/2022;
scheduled for MY5
AOC-25 UT1 Reach 4 Invasive Plant 0.58 AC Herbicide applied
dominance kudzu Severe 2020/2021/2022;
scheduled for MY5
AOC-26 UT1 Reach 2 Invasive Plant 1.10 AC Herbicide applied
dominance kudzu Mild 2020/2021/2022;
scheduled for MY5
AOC-27 UT3 Reach 4 Invasive Plant 0.49 AC Herbicide applied
dominance kudzu Severe 2020/2021/2022;
scheduled for MY5
AOC-28 UT3 Reach 2,3 Invasive Plant 1.04 AC Herbicide applied
and 4 dominance kudzu Mild 2020/2021/2022;
scheduled for MY5
AOC-29 UT3 Reach 1 Invasive Plant 0.13 AC Herbicide applied
dominance tree of Mild 2020/2021/2022;
heaven scheduled for MY5
AOC-30 UT2 Reach 3 Invasive plant 0.34 AC Herbicide applied
dominance- kudzu Mild 2020/2021/2022;
scheduled for MY5
AOC-31 UT3 Reach 2 Invasive plant 0.21 AC Herbicide applied
dominance privet Severe 2020/2021/2022;
scheduled for MY5
AOC-32 UT2 Reach 1,2 Invasive plant 3.25 AC Herbicide applied
and 3 dominance- kudzu Moderate 2020/2021/2022;
scheduled for MY5
AOC-33 UT2 Reach 3 Invasive plant 1.59 AC Herbicide applied
and 4 dominance- kudzu Moderate 2020/2021/2022;
scheduled for MY5
AOC-34 UT2 Reach 4 Invasive plant 0.30 AC Herbicide applied
dominance privet Severe 2020/2021/2022;
scheduled for MY5
AOC-35 UT2 Reach 4 Invasive plant 0.13 AC Herbicide applied
dominance privet Severe 2020/2021/2022;
scheduled for MY5
1.01 AC
AOC-36 UT3 Reach 4 Invasive plant Herbicide applied
Severe
dominance kudzu 2020/2021/2022;
scheduled for MY5
AOC-37 UT2 Reach 2 Invasive plant 0.07 AC Herbicide applied
dominance tree of Mild 2020/2021/2022;
heaven scheduled for MY5
AOC-38 UT2 Reach 3 Invasive plant 1.54 AC Herbicide applied
dominance privet Moderate 2020/2021/2022;
scheduled for MY5
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 15 of 17
Monitoring Year 4 Report
February 6, 2024
AOC - # Location Problem Description Rank/size Action
AOC-39 UT1 STA ~6+25 Remove beaver dams Moderate Removal/maintena
(New) and beaver nce scheduled for
MY5
AOC-40 UT1 STA Potential eroding right Mild Maintenance
(New) ~10+75 stream bank Scheduled MY5
Add Photo Point
and Bank Pins
AOC-41 UT1 STA Undercut left stream Mild Maintenance
(New) ~11+00 bank Scheduled MY5
Add Photo Point
AOC-42 UT2 STA 25+20 Log sill piping Moderate Complete
(New)
AOC-43 UT2 STA Log sill piping Moderate Complete
(New) ~25+30
AOC-44 UT2 STA Log sill piping Moderate Complete
(New) ~25+61
AOC-45 UT2 STA Log sill piping Moderate Complete
(New) ~29+20
AOC-46 UT2 STA Log sill piping Moderate Complete
(New) ~30+00
AOC-47 UT3 STA Eroding right stream Moderate Maintenance
(New) ~101+60 bank Scheduled MY5
AOC-48 UT3 STA Large gravel deposit Moderate Complete
(New) ~115+50 - shifting stream to the
~116+00 right
AOC-49 UT2 STA Erosion occurring in Mild Maintenance
(New) ~15+40 rock swale on right Scheduled MY5
bank
AOC-50 UT2 STA Erosion occurring on Moderate Maintenance
(New) ~18+50 right bank Scheduled MY5
AOC-51 UT1 STA 13+80 Stream cutting around Mild Maintenance
(New) rock structure Scheduled MY5
AOC-52 UT3 STA Failed boulder step Moderate Maintenance
(New) 124+35 causing impediment to Scheduled MY5
aquatic life
AOC-53 UT2 STA Eroding right Moderate Complete
(New) ~10+75 streambank
AOC-54 UT2 STA Mid channel bar Moderate Complete
(New) ~14+00 forming. Eroding right
streambank.
AOC-55 UT2 STA Bare right slope above Moderate Complete
(New) ~30+25 stream
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 16 of 17
Monitoring Year 4 Report
February 6, 2024
9.0 References
ClearWater Environmental Consultants Inc. and Wildlands Engineering Inc. (2017)
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project Mitigation Plan
ClearWater Environmental Consultants Inc. (2020) Harmon Dairy Mitigation Project As-
Built Report.
Harrelson, Cheryl C; C. L Rawlins; J.P. Potyondy. 1994. Stream channel reference sites:
an illustrated guide to field technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-245. Fort Collins, CO:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range
Experiment Station. 61 p.
Rosgen, David L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers, CATENA,Volume 22, Issue
3.Pages 169-199
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland
Compensatory Mitigation Update October 24, 2016
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 17 of 17
Monitoring Year 4 Report
February 6, 2024
Attachment A: Recorded Conservation Easement
Attachment E: Visual Assessment Photographs
ЉЏΉЋАΉЋЉЋЌ
ЉЏΉЋАΉЋЉЋЌ
Photo 1. View of broken fence located at the Photo 2. View of broken fence located at the
westernmost area of the property. westernmost area of the property.
ЉЏΉЋАΉЋЉЋЌ
ЉЏΉЋАΉЋЉЋЌ
Photo 3. View of broken fence located east of Photo 4. View of beaver dam between Photo
MY3 broken fence. Point 28 and Photo Point 29.
ЉЏΉЋАΉЋЉЋЌ
ЉЏΉЋАΉЋЉЋЌ
Photo 5. View of beaver dam from Photo Photo 6. View of beaver activity from Photo
Point 29. Point 29.
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 1 of 2
MY4 Areas of Concern Photographic Documentation
Photo 7. Increased beaver activity in August Photo 8. Increased beaver activity west of
2023. UT1.
Photo 9. View of beaver activity near dam. Photo 10. View of beaver dam facing east.
Harmon Dairy Stream Mitigation Project page 2 of 2
MY4 Areas of Concern Photographic Documentation
Attachment F: Areas of Concern
OC-1
A
OC-41
A
OC-40
A
OC-39
A
OC-49
A
OC-51
A
OC-6
A
OC-50
A
OC-47
A
djustCE-
ABoundaryinPlattoexcludegravelford
OC-52
A
Attachment G: Letters of Communication