Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20231418 Ver 1_More Info Received_20240119 19 January 2024 Via Electronic Mail NC Division of Water Resources Attn: Mr. Allen Stewart, Environmental Specialist II 943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 Glenn.Stewart@nc.deq.gov Re: Quality Marine Travel Lift Response to DWR Request for Additional Information DWR PN # 20231418 v1 SEGi, on behalf of Quality Marine, LLC, is submitting this response to the NC Division of Water Resource’s 22 December 2023 request for additional information. Please find the content of the DWR’s letter follow by our response below: 1. Will your settling basin design meet the Turbidity requirements for SC; Sw; NSW waters? Please provide detailed information on how this will be achieved. 15A NCAC 02B .0220 TIDAL SALTWATER QUALITY STANDARDS FOR CLASS SC WATERS In addition to the standards set forth in Rule .0208 of this Section, the following water quality standards shall apply to all Class SC waters. (19) Turbidity: the turbidity in the receiving water shall not exceed 25 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU); if turbidity exceeds this level due to natural background conditions, the existing turbidity level shall not be increased. Compliance with this turbidity standard shall be deemed met when land management activities employ Best Management Practices (BMPs), defined by Rule .0202 of this Section, recommended by the Designated Nonpoint Source Agency, as defined by Rule .0202 of this Section. Baseline turbidity testing within the Neuse River will be performed prior to dredging. The findings will serve as the turbidity level of the return water, when greater than 25 NTU. Turbidity levels of the return water will be tested before and during discharging into the Neuse River. Manual stop gates will be utilized to release water once the turbidity levels are below the allowable 25 NTU or no greater than the baseline turbidity level. The outlet control structure is being designed to only release overflow from stormwater runoff. 2. Due to past commercial activity in the turning basin dredging area, DWR has serious concerns of heavy metal toxins being released from the dredging activity and effluent from the settling basin. Has any sampling for heavy metals been done in the turning basin dredging area? If heavy metal toxicity sampling has been completed, please provide the results. If not, then sampling of the turning basin area is required. 15A NCAC 02B .0219 FRESH SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS FOR CLASS B WATERS The following water quality standards shall apply to surface waters that are for primary contact recreation as defined in Rule .0202 of this Section and are classified as Class B waters. Water quality standards applicable to Class C waters as described in Rule .0211 of this Section also apply to Class B waters. (9) Metals: (a) With the exception of mercury and selenium, acute and chronic tidal salt water quality standards for metals shall be based upon measurement of the dissolved fraction of the metals. Mercury and selenium shall be based upon measurement of the total recoverable metal; 5315 South College Road, Suite E Wilmington, North Carolina 28412 910.452.2711office@segi.us www.segi.us Quality Marine Travel Lift Response to DWR RFAI 1-19-24 (b) With the exception of mercury and selenium, acute and chronic tidal saltwater quality aquatic life standards for metals listed in this Sub-Item shall apply as a function of the pollutant's water effect ratio (WER). The WER shall be assigned a value equal to one unless any person demonstrates to the Division in a permit proceeding that another value is developed in accordance with the "Water Quality Standards Handbook: Second Edition" published by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA- 823-B-12-002). Alternative site-specific standards may also be developed when any person submits values that demonstrate to the Commission that they were derived in accordance with the "Water Quality Standards Handbook: Second Edition, Recalculation Procedure or the Resident Species Procedure." (c) Acute and chronic tidal salt water quality metals standards shall be as follows: (purposely omitted) (d) Compliance with acute instream metals standards shall only be evaluated using an average of two or more samples collected within one hour. Compliance with chronic instream metals standards shall only be evaluated using averages of a minimum of four samples taken on consecutive days, or as a 96- hour average. In May of 2021, SM&E conducted a limited environmental assessment on both land and subaqueous soils, specifically to address concerns with metals and other known contaminants that may have been released during past usage of the site and the adjacent waterbody. According to SM&E’s “Limited Environmental Soil Assessment” (see Attachment 1), none of the tested soils contained contaminants that exceeded the states action levels. 3. Please expand upon the purpose and need of your project. “The purpose of this project is to provide a 100 ton travel lift in New Bern, North Carolina, where this type of facility is in high demand.” “Parking and/ or boat storage area is not provided on the site. The vessels will be removed from the site as soon as they are taken out of the water. Please see Attachment 8 for details.” In addition, please describe how vessels will leave the site as soon as they are removed from the water, I did not see where attachment 8 covers this. Average size of a 100 ton vessel is 65-85 ft. in length, draft is 5-10 ft and a beam of 16-25 ft. How will vessels of this size exit the property and travel roads and highways? The CAMA Major Permit Application erroneously states a 100 ton travel lift. This should be 300 ton travel lift, and it should be noted that the applicant already has the lift in his possession, which is the reason why it is being utilized on this site. That being said, there will be instances when larger vessels (i.e., those that are too large to transport on NC DOT roads) are stored on site for minor repairs and cleaning. To accommodate for the ability to service vessels of this size, after dredging operations have been completed, the spoil disposal basin will be reconfigured to allow for 2 - 40’ x 65’ and 1 – 40’ x 55’ concrete pads, as well as a double path drive (see Attachment 2). The proposed change increases the final project built upon area to 44,984 SF or 21.7%, which is less than the max of 24%. It is our hope that the information found within and attached to this correspondence will address any concerns the Division may have with the proposed project. However, should you need anything further, please call me at 910.228.1841. I’d be happy to speak with you. Sincerely, Dana A. Lutheran Regulatory Specialist Enclosures (2) cc: NC Division of Water Resources 401 & Buffer Unit – Raleigh (3 hard copies sent UPS) gregg.bodnar@nc.deq.gov 5315 South College Road, Suite E Wilmington, North Carolina 28412 910.452.2711office@segi.us www.segi.us Quality Marine Travel Lift Response to DWR RFAI 1-19-24 Attachment 1 SM&E Limited Environmental Soil Assessment 5315 South College Road, Suite E Wilmington, North Carolina 28412 910.452.2711office@segi.us www.segi.us Limited Environmental Soil Assessment Proposed Fulcher’s Seafood Vessel Maintenance Facility New Bern, Craven County, North Carolina S&ME Project No. 210981 PREPARED FOR: Andrew Consulting Engineers, P.C. 3811 Peachtree Avenue, Suite 300 Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 PREPARED BY: S&ME, Inc. 3006 Hall Waters Drive, Suite 100 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 June 21, 2021 June 21, 2021 Andrew Consulting Engineers, P.C. 3811 Peachtree Avenue, Suite 300 Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 Attention: Mr. Neal Andrew, P.E. Reference: Limited Environmental Soil Assessment Proposed Fulcher’s Seafood Vessel Maintenance Facility 202 Old Cherry Point Road, New Bern, North Carolina S&ME Project No. 210981 Dear Mr. Andrew: S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) presents this limited environmental soil assessment conducted at the above referenced location. This report addresses the purpose for conducting the assessment, describes the scope of services provided by S&ME, summarizes our field activities and laboratory results, and presents our conclusions and recommendations. These services were performed in general accordance with S&ME’s Proposal No. 210981, dated February 22, 2021 and CASE Agreement 10-2019 (ACE Project No. 20062) dated April 12, 2021. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us at your convenience. Sincerely, S&ME, Inc. Benjamin Best Gerald Paul Environmental Professional Senior Project Manager bbest@smeinc.comjpaul@smeinc.com Senior Reviewed by: Thomas P. Raymond, P.E., P.M.P S&ME, Inc. | 3006 Hall Waters Drive, Suite 100 | Wilmington, NC 28405 | p 910.799.9945| www.smeinc.com Limited Environmental Soil Assessment Proposed Fulcher’s Seafood Vessel Maintenance Facility 202 Old Cherry Point Road, New Bern, North Carolina S&ME Project No. 210981 Table of Contents 1.0Project Background ........................................................................................................... 1 2.0Scope of Services ............................................................................................................... 1 2.1Soil Borings and Sampling ............................................................................................................ 1 2.1.1Land Portion ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2.1.2Water Portion .................................................................................................................................... 2 3.0Analytical Results ............................................................................................................. 2 3.1Land Based - Soil Sample Analytical Results ............................................................................. 2 3.2Water Based - Soil Sample Analytical Results ............................................................................ 3 4.0Conclusions ........................................................................................................................ 3 5.0Qualification of Report .................................................................................................... 3 Figures Figure 1 – Vicinity Map Figure 2 – Soil Sample Locations Figure 1 – Soil Results Map Tables Table 1 – Summary of Soil Analytical Results – Land Based Samples Table 2 – Summary of Soil Analytical Results – Water Based Samples Appendices Appendix I – Photographic Log Appendix II – Laboratory Reports and Chains of Custody June 21, 2021 ii Limited Environmental Soil Assessment Proposed Fulcher’s Seafood Vessel Maintenance Facility 202 Old Cherry Point Road, New Bern, North Carolina S&ME Project No. 210981 1.0Project Background Project information was provided to S&ME during a conference call between Neal Andrew, P.E. (Andrew Consulting Engineers), Carter Hubard, P.E and Kristen Morris, P.E. (WK Dickson), and S&ME’s Nate Buffum, P.E., Walter Cole, Jerry Paul, and Sam Watts on February 1, 2021. It’s S&ME’s understanding that Fulcher’s Seafood is proposing to install a 300 ton marine travel lift facility at 202 Old Cherry Point Road in New Bern, North Carolina. The existing five acre site is adjacent to the Neuse River that has been used for industrial and commercial operations for the past several decades. The property is bordered on the North and East by the Neuse River. The South side of the property is bordered with Old Cherry Point Road and residential housing, and US Hwy 70/55 Ramp (to Bridgeton) to the West. 2.0Scope of Services In preparation of our field service, S&ME prepared a site-specific Health and Safety Plan in general accordance with 29 CFR 1910.120. The site is shown on the attached Vicinity Map (Figure 1). The soil sampling locations are indicated on Figure 2. 2.1Soil Borings and Sampling 2.1.1Land Portion On May 6, 2021 S&ME conducted a limited soil sampling event at the above referenced property associated with the proposed travel lift location. S&ME collected a total of nine composite soil samples from ten proposed soil boring locations using a stainless-steel hand auger. A sample was unable to be collected from the proposed boring location SB-2 due to hand auger refusal due to compacted gravel at the proposed location. S&ME field staff attempted to offset the soil boring multiple times in the vicinity of the proposed boring but were ultimately unsuccessful. Using a stainless-steel hand auger, S&ME’s field staff advanced the auger in one-foot intervals until the observed water table was encountered. Soil samples were logged and classified to identify soil types according to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Hand auguring was terminated at three and one-half feet below ground surface (ft. bgs) due to limited soil recovery in the hand auger. At each interval a sample was collected in a plastic resealable bag and placed on ice in a cooler. An aliquot of each soil sample was placed in a resealable bag and placed outside the cooler. After waiting approximately 15 minutes to allow the sample to reach ambient temperature and headspace equilibrium, the aliquot sample was screened with a photoionization detector (PID) to assess for possible contamination. The hand auger was decontaminated between each sample location. Nine composite soil samples were collected from the screened intervals described above. The samples were placed into laboratory-supplied containers, labeled, stored on ice, and shipped under standard chain-of-custody procedures to Pace Analytical of Mt. Juliet, Tennessee, a North Carolina certified laboratory, to be analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260B, semi-volatile organic compounds by EPA Method 8270C, and eight RCRA metals (AS, Ba, Cd, Cr, Pb, Hg, Se, and Ag) by EPA Methods 6010/7471. The soil borings June 21, 2021 1 Limited Environmental Soil Assessment Proposed Fulcher’s Seafood Vessel Maintenance Facility 202 Old Cherry Point Road, New Bern, North Carolina S&ME Project No. 210981 were properly abandoned following the collection of the soil sample by filling the void with the remaining soil cuttings. Residual soils at the site generally consisted of sand, gravelly sand, and silty sand that were typically tan, brown, dark brown, to black in color. No visual or olfactory evidence contamination was noted at any of the boring locations. The PID screening measurements ranged from 1.5 ppm in the sample collected at 2-3‘ bgs in soil boring P-2 to 11.7 ppm in the sample collected at 2-3‘ in soil boring FBR-1. These field screen screening measurements may have been slightly elevated due to the moisture in the soil but were not indicative of soil contamination with no other indications. 2.1.2Water Portion On April 26, 2021, S&ME mobilized to the site to begin field activities which included launching the barge mounted drill rig and beginning soil boring and sampling over the water in the proposed turning basin. S&ME was on-site April 26 through 28, 2021 completing soil borings and sampling. The soil borings were advanced with a barge mounted, CME 550 drill rig utilizing the automatic hammer method with a mud rotary bit into the soil. Soil samples were obtained with a standard 1.4-inch I.D., 2-inch O.D., split barrel sampler on 2.5-foot intervals in the top 5 feet and on to 10 feet intervals thereafter. Soil recovered from the boring was classified onsite by S&ME personnel and screened at approximately one and one-half foot depth intervals with a PID to measure relative headspace concentrations of VOCs, which may be associated with petroleum products or other organic chemicals (i.e., organic solvents). Residual soils below the proposed channel and turning basin generally consisted of very soft black organic clay, underlain by layers of gray/tan sand, and white/tan gravel and sand with shell fragments. Detailed lithologic descriptions can be found in S&ME’s Geotechnical Exploration Report dated June 7, 2021. No visual or olfactory evidence contamination was noted at any of the boring locations. The PID screening measurements ranged from 0.8 ppm in the sample collected at 27.5-30’ in soil boring C-1 to 8.3 ppm in the sample collected at 0-2.5‘ in soil boring C-2. These field screen screening measurements may have been slightly elevated due to the moisture in the soil but were not indicative of soil contamination with no other indications. Seven composite soil samples were collected from the screened intervals described above. The seven soil borings were completed in locations proposed under the geotechnical scope of work. The samples were placed into laboratory-supplied containers, labeled, stored on ice, and shipped under standard chain-of-custody procedures to Pace Analytical of Mt. Juliet. The soil samples were analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260B, for semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270C, and for eight RCRA metals (As, Ba, Cd, Cr, Pb, Hg, Se, and Ag) by EPA Method 6010/7471. Photographs of notable site features are included in Appendix I. 3.0Analytical Results 3.1Land Based - Soil Sample Analytical Results The laboratory analytical results of the soil samples collected on May 6, 2021 showed detections of two VOC’s (acetone and naphthalene) above the laboratory’s reported method detection limits in sample SB-1, but below the June 21, 2021 2 Limited Environmental Soil Assessment Proposed Fulcher’s Seafood Vessel Maintenance Facility 202 Old Cherry Point Road, New Bern, North Carolina S&ME Project No. 210981 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), Division of Waste Management, Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch, Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRG). Soil samples LB-1, B-1, B-2, B-3, SB-1, and SB-3 showed low level detections of several SVOC’s above the laboratory method detection limits. Benzo(a)pyrene was reported in the B-1 sample at a concentration of 0.203 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), which is marginally above both the Protection of Groundwater PSRG and Residential Health Based PSRG. Sample SB-1 was reported with detections of benzo(a)anthracene at 2.10 mg/kg, benzo(b)fluoranthene at 2.73 mg/kg, benzo(a)pyrene at 1.83 mg/kg, and dibenz(a,h)anthracene at 0.255 mg/kg, all of which are over their respective Residential Health Based PSRGs. Arsenic was reported in samples FBR-1 at a concentration of 2.77 mg/kg, sample B-1 at 6.1 mg/kg, and sample SB-1 at 11.4 mg/kg, all of which exceed the Residential Health Based PSRG of 0.68 mg/kg. Lead was reported in sample SB-1 at a concentration of 298 mg/kg, which is above the protection of groundwater PSRG of 270 mg/kg. The land-based soil analytical results and a comparison to the NCDEQ PSRGs are included in Table 1. The laboratory analytical report and chain-of-custody forms are included in Appendix II. 3.2Water Based - Soil Sample Analytical Results The laboratory analytical results of the soil samples collected between April 26 through 28, 2021 had no detections of VOC’s or SVOC’s at or above the laboratory reported method detection limits. Cadmium was reported at 3.77 mg/kg in sample C-3, which is above the Protection of Groundwater PSRG of 3.0 mg/kg. The water-based soil analytical results and a comparison to the applicable NCDEQ PSRGs are included in Table 2. The laboratory analytical report and chain-of-custody forms are included in Appendix II. 4.0Conclusions Land-based soil sample results: Several SVOCs, arsenic and lead were detected marginally above PSRGs. During construction, it can be expected that marginally impacted soils will be encountered. Provisions for worker health and safety should be considered for people possibly exposed to excavated soil. If soils require removal and off- site disposal; the soil should be disposed at a permitted facility. Water-Based Soil Sample Results: Only cadmium was detected in one of the seven samples (C-1 at 3.77 mg/kg), marginally above the Protection of Groundwater PSRG for cadmium of 3.0 mg/kg. An average value of cadmium for the seven soil samples collected from the channel bottom results in a value well below the PSRG. Soil from the bottom of the channel where the samples were collected may be considered non-environmentally impacted for the list of parameters analyzed by the laboratory. 5.0Qualification of Report This report is an instrument of service of S&ME. The report was prepared for and is intended for the exclusive use of Andrew Consulting Engineers P.C. The Limited Soil and Groundwater Assessment was generally conducted as outlined in S&ME’s Proposal No. 210981, dated February 22, 2021 and CASE Agreement 10-2019 (ACE Project No. 20062) dated April 12, 2021. The findings presented in this report are based on conditions encountered at the June 21, 2021 3 Limited Environmental Soil Assessment Proposed Fulcher’s Seafood Vessel Maintenance Facility 202 Old Cherry Point Road, New Bern, North Carolina S&ME Project No. 210981 location sampled on the date of S&ME’s investigation and should not be relied upon to precisely represent conditions at any other time or at location other than sampled. The conclusions included in this report are based on S&ME’s observations of existing Site conditions and the results of a limited program of subsurface soil sampling, and laboratory analysis of collected samples. Be aware that conditions may change at any sampled or unsampled location as a function of time in response to natural conditions, chemical reactions, and/or other events. Conclusions about site conditions under no circumstances comprise a warranty that conditions in all areas within the site are of the same condition as those sampled. Any additional information about this site that becomes available should be provided to S&ME for its review, so S&ME can modify its recommendations, as necessary. June 21, 2021 4 Appendices June 21, 2021 Figures June 21, 2021 __ ^^ ___ __^^^_____ ^^^^^^^ ³ 02,0004,000 (FEET) REFERENCE: GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM THE ESRI ONLINE WORLD STREET MAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED Subject Property OTHERWISE. FIGURE NO. SCALE: VICINITY MAP 1 " = 2,000 ' DATE: 1 5-26-21 FULCHER'S SEAFOOD VESSEL FACILITY PROJECT NUMBER 202 OLD CHERRY POINT ROAD 210981 NEW BERN, CRAVEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ³ C-1 TB-1 C-2 C-3 C-4 @ A @ A @ A @ A @ A LB-1 FBR-1 SB-1 C-5 @ A @ A @ A B-2 @ A P-1 SB-3 @ A @@ AA C-6 @ A SB-2 @ A B-1 (No sample collected) @ A @ A @ A B-3 P-2 0300600 (FEET) REFERENCE:Soil Boring @ A GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM 2018 NCONEMAP.COM ORTHOIMAGERY LAYER. Subject Property THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS Craven County Parcels STATED OTHERWISE. FIGURE NO. SCALE: SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS 1 " = 300 ' DATE: 2 5-28-21 FULCHER'S SEAFOOD VESSEL FACILITY PROJECT NUMBER OLD CHERRY POINT ROAD 210981 NEW BERN, CRAVEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ³ TB-1 ALL LESS THAN PSRGs C-1 mg/kg C-2 CADMIUM 3.8 ALL LESS THAN PSRGs C-4 FBR-1 mg/kg ALL LESS THAN PSRGs ARSENIC 2.77 @ A @ A @ A @ A @ A B-2 LB-1 ALL LESS THAN PSRGs ALL LESS THAN PSRGs C-3 @ A ALL LESS THAN PSRGs @ A @ A SB-1 mg/kg @ A P-1 BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE 2.10 ALL LESS THAN PSRGs BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE 2.73 @ A C-5 @@ AA BENZO(A)PYRENE 1.83 ALL LESS THAN PSRGs DIBENZ(A,H)ANTHRACENE 0.255 @ A ARSENIC 11.4 @ A LEAD 298 SB-2 @ A NO SAMPLE COLLECTED C-6 @ A ALL LESS THAN PSRGs @ A SB-3 ALL LESS THAN PSRGs P-2 ALL LESS THAN PSRGs B-1 mg/kg B-3 BENZO(A)PYRENE 0.203 ALL LESS THAN PSRGs ARSENIC 6.1 0300600 (FEET) REFERENCE: GIS BASE LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM 2018 NCONEMAP.COM ORTHOIMAGERY LAYER. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. mg/kg = MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM Soil Boring @ A RESULTS SHOWN ARE EXCEEDANCES OF THE PRELIMINARY SOIL REMEDIATION GOALS (PSRGs). Subject Property Craven County Parcels SAMPLES COLLECTED IN APRIL AND MAY 2021 FIGURE NO. SCALE: SOIL SAMPLE RESULTS 1 " = 300 ' DATE: 3 6-18-21 FULCHER'S SEAFOOD VESSEL FACILITY PROJECT NUMBER 202 OLD CHERRY POINT ROAD 210981 NEW BERN, CRAVEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Tables June 21, 2021 Appendix I – Photographic Log June 21, 2021 Limited Environmental Soil Assessment Proposed Fulcher’s Seafood Vessel Maintenance Facility 202 Old Cherry Point Road, New Bern, North Carolina S&ME Project No. 210981 1 2 0 2 / 5 1 / 4 e l e e P m i J : r e h p a r g o t o h P Location / Orientation West Subject Property / Facing West 1 Remarks View of FBR-1 Location 1 2 0 2 / 5 1 / 4 e l e e P m i J : r e h p a r g o t o h P Location / Orientation West Subject Property / Facing Northwest 2 Remarks View of P-2 Location Limited Environmental Soil Assessment Proposed Fulcher’s Seafood Vessel Maintenance Facility 202 Old Cherry Point Road, New Bern, North Carolina S&ME Project No. 210981 1 2 0 2 / 5 1 / 4 e l e e P m i J : r e h p a r g o t o h P Location / Orientation East Subject Property / Facing East 3 Remarks View of B-1 Location 1 2 0 2 / 5 1 / 4 e l e e P m i J : r e h p a r g o t o h P Location / Orientation East Subject Property / Facing Northwest 4 Remarks View of B-2 Location. Limited Environmental Soil Assessment Proposed Fulcher’s Seafood Vessel Maintenance Facility 202 Old Cherry Point Road, New Bern, North Carolina S&ME Project No. 210981 1 2 0 2 / 5 1 / 4 e l e e P m i J : r e h p a r g o t o h P Location / Orientation South Subject Property / Facing Northwest 5 Remarks View of B-3 Location. Limited Environmental Soil Assessment Proposed Fulcher’s Seafood Vessel Maintenance Facility 202 Old Cherry Point Road, New Bern, North Carolina S&ME Project No. 210981 Appendix II – Laboratory Analytical Report and Chain of Custody June 21, 2021 Quality Marine Travel Lift Response to DWR RFAI 1-19-24 Attachment 2 Proposed Post Dredging Site Plan 5315 South College Road, Suite E Wilmington, North Carolina 28412 910.452.2711office@segi.us www.segi.us DESCRIPTIONBYDATENO. PHASE 2 SITE PLAN AAA-07/19/21CONCEPT DRAWING DRAWING TITLE: NEW BERN, NC TCHAADJW1/12/2023 FULCHER'S POINT DREDGE SITE C2 SUITE 301 (f)910-762-4201 (t)910-762-4200 PROFESSIONAL SEAL QUALITY MARINE SERVICES, INC. 300 N. THIRD STREET WILMINGTON, NC 28401NC LICENSE NO.F-0374 WWW.WKDICKSON.COM 20210023.00.WL REVISION RECORDPROJECT NAME: community infrastructure consultants PROJ. MGR.:DESIGN BY:DRAWN BY:PROJ. DATE:DRAWING NUMBER:WKD PROJ. NO.: CONCEPT DRAWINGS - FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY RIPARIAN CORRIDOR CORRIDOR 15' SETBACK OF RIPARIAN DOLPHN PILES TO REMAIN, TYP. CAMA PERMIT FOR THIS SITE.ANTICIPATED DREDGED MATERIAL IS MADE UP OF ORGANIC, SILTY FINEGRAINED SOILS. SETTLING TESTS SHOULD BE PERFORMED ON THE SOILSTO DETERMINE THE LENGTH OF TIME ANTICIPATED FOR SETTLING OFSOILS WILL BE TRANSPORTED.THE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE.TO REMAIN IMPERVIOUS. THE IMPOUNDMENT EMBANKMENT MAY BESEEDED AN AN ALTERNATIVE TO SOD. DREDGED SEDIMENTS. AFTER DREDGED MATERIAL IS DRIED AND TESTED.IMPOUNDMENT TO CAPTURE AND DISCHARGE STORMWATER THROUGH 4.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SOD ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS THAT ARE NOT 2.PER GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BY S&ME DATED 06/08/2021, THE3.THE SEDIMENT BASIN WILL BE CONVERTED TO AN ABOVE GROUND NOTES:1.CONTRACTOR SHALL ABIDE BY ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE ASSOCIATED WAVE ACTION LINE FEMA LIMIT OF MODERATE L W N T S 2 E 7 A N L 3 I 8P V E AA L A G 7 M G A L W P E N 7 , C Y A2 9 8 L 0 3 O1 97 L D1 : A NS ESK g O E W 6 O n R G B i D d ', lL D n D i4 W A E a4 A Bl. P E Y t H 1 D T e S 4 DREDGED CHANNEL BASELINE L R 6 : 1 E w 5 R A P E W O L4 N C R 0 WP 4 O . t 5 c 4 A e s T 4 L l E a L E Wi t N R n 4 e T A t o S p 5 g T n 1 3 i U t L N sS 6 i T T I x S 2 M 31 E I E A C A L H 21 L R R C E W 3 6 L L E F C FF s 7 F dU nU B 2 a B l A G t eER 4 E V w V lI WEIGHT SCALES A RELOCATED CONCRETE a R tM s A E a 8 C S SETTLING BASIN OUTLET PIPE SUPPORTED ONTIMBER PILES o c'U 0 E 3 N D ' 5 0 L 5 1 W C e S n T h o 2I c Z t M ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT ei (1,857 SF) I n LD o ' Z Ce 0 2 l . ' E ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACT (2,607 SF)9 5 1 a 2 0 A . 7 1 w 0 AS 5 1 1 1 M 1 g 6 A 0 n Ci 1 t ' 0 s 5i 1 9 7x E 8 L 9 7 W 1 8 Ne c 8 n 7 e 7 f 2 9 k 7 n 0 i 3 1 l 1 n 1 i a h c 4 6 57 kc ab tes er ut cur ts '51 rod irr oC nai ra piR 7 8 6 9 7 9 8 7 DREDGED BOAT TURNING BASIN AREA 8 BULKHEAD W/ CAP STORMWATER IMPOUNDMENT DREDGED BOAT LIFT N O I T 7 A BOAT LIFT 5 T R E O G P BULKHEAD 50' X 50' (2,500 SF) A S P N S , T PROPOSED TWO 8' WIDE A I 3 (DESIGN TBD) R M 2 I T L 4 CONCRETE PADS GRAVEL ACCESS DRIVEWAYS 1 R R F E E F F O K F F U O U (3) 40' X 85' HEAVY DUTY B T B O R N G B E E E V V I D M R A E T ME E S A R CU D A E ' N APPROXIMATE FOOTPRINT OF 300 TON TRAVEL 0 P 3 SETTLING BASIN OUTLET STRUCTURE ' E S 0 5T APPROXIMATELY 370' OF EXISTING WOODEN D I 1 M I C e 2L n N o e C Z n E o A Z A M A C ' ' 0 . 55 7 ' 7 0 . 0 5 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: PROPERTY AREA: 4.74 ACEXISTING BUA: 23,480 SF/ 0.539 ACPROPOSED BUA: 44,984 SF/ 0.971 ACBUA DENSITY: 21.7%LOD: 147,925 SF/ 3.40 AC ILCOX, 1/18/2024 2:59:10 PMdwgZ:\\Projects\\Andrew Consulting Engineers\\2021002300WL - Fulcher's Point Travel Lift\\CADD\\Plan Set\\20210023_C_BASE PH2.dwg, DWFILE PATH:Z:\\Projects\\Andrew Consulting Engineers\\2021002300WL - Fulcher's Point Travel Lift\\CADD\\Plan Set\\20210023_C_BASE PH2. FROM THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED WITH AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE VALID, TRUE COPIES. ESDELETIONS TO THIS DOCUMENT, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF W.K. DICKSON & CO., INC., IS PROHIBITED. ONLY COPI RCOPYRIGHT ©, W.K. DICKSON & CO., INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT; ADDITIONS O