The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20151050 Ver 1_401 Application_20151015Wetlands and Mr. William Elliott U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Asheville Regulatory Field Office 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, NC 28801 Mr. Bryan Tompkins U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Asheville Field Office 160 Zillicoa St. Asheville, NC 28801 Mr. Alan Johnson NCDENR Division of Water Resources 610 East Center Street, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Ms. Karen Higgins NCDENR Division of Water Resources Wetlands & Storm Water Branch 512 North Salisbury Street Raleigh, NC 27604 Q EEO L October 5, 2015 Ms. Higgins and Messrs. Elliott, Johnson and Tompkins, Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC. 20151050 ! -.- l�� OCT X62015 i DER4.r �A- rs 401 R BllFFc,`. Enclosed is a request for Nationwide Permit #39 associated with the proposed expansion of a commercial manufacturing facility located at 10021 Westlake Drive, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The jurisdictional features on the site were delineated and verified by the USACE and NCDWR on July 22, 2015. Proposed permanent impacts associated with the project total approximately 0.106 acres of onsite wetlands. Specifically, 0.029 acres of non - forested wetland and 0.077 acres of forested wetland will be filled for site grading, stormwater treatment and access. No impacts to jurisdictional tributaries will occur as part of this project. The site plan was designed to avoid jurisdictional features to the maximum extent practicable while still incorporating necessary site development and viable access. Due to the location /extent of jurisdictional features on the site, complete avoidance was not practicable. All impacts are associated with the expansion of the existing structure, stabilization of stormwater treatment structures and site access. No mitigation is proposed for anticipated wetland impacts. '+ dYr» ri�+: r-+ V�YSartr�* nxisl+ e- xa .;vnyruk�»+a +,a,.vvrFw'n'.,�°. kr✓ rdryti. �' iryyv. t:,. �µ.' i�-: y�:': s:. rvr. w- w+'n*b- «YurorGr++MhvA�ta'rriJ4^+ Sir•: +aN'a6'dK'��.*'r�v4.*a�.ftem <.+ dew+ �- �vs»....».- u.,....F'dUCtir�"!xnl++.r'J.,w. .n,.:rH,.*ar..§«t ^Nw'Hi.Nr a,:a,ti/h; Y+us e".ti ^�rv+'G.wSY..%rv++*+< Charlotte Office: www.wetlands- epg.com Asheville Office: 10612 -D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I PMB S50 Suite 10, PMB 283 Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805 (704) 904 -2277 (828) 708 -7059 len.rindner @wetlands- epg.com 1 amanda.lones @wetlands- epg.com Wetlands and Environmental Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC. Also enclosed are five copies of sealed surveys in which we are requesting USACE signature on. Once signed /approved, please return all 5 copies back to WEPG. Also enclosed is a copy of our Threatened /Endangered Species Evaluation for the site in which limited habitat exists for the recently listed Northern Long Eared Bat (NLEB). The site is partially wooded with existing industrial structures so habitat for NLEB does exist. However, due to its location which is at least 50 miles away from a known occurrence and the fact that there is ample /similar habitat surrounding the site, we believe this project is not likely to adversely effect the Northern Long Eared Bat and will have no effect on any other listed species. We appreciate the opportunity to provide this information and please contact us if you have any questions Sincerely, Amanda Jones, PWS Amanda Jones Regulatory Specialist Heath Caldwell, PWS f 1 Heath Caldwell Environmental Scientist Charlotte Office: www.wetlands- epg.com Asheville Office: 10612 -D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283 Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805 (704) 904 -2277 (828) 708 -7059 len.rindner @wetlands- epg.com 2 amanda.iones @wetlands- epg.com CD r-r D n� O� WC, Permit Application of VIA TE9 o�, pG Office Use Only: �� r Corps action ID no. 1h 0 t _rlae�r r DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? I ❑ Yes ❑X No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ because written approval is not required? 401 Certification: ❑ Yes ❑X No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program. 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h below. Oh. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? 2. Project Information 2a Name of project: Schaefer - Westlake Drive 2b. County: Mecklenburg 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Charlotte 2d. Subdivision name: 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Schaefer Systems International Inc. 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): 3d. Street address: PO Box 7009 3e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28241 3f. Telephone no.: 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: For the record only for Corps Permit: ❑ Yes NX No ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑X No Page 1 of 10 PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: interested buyer 4b. Name: Larry B. Smith, Jr. 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: L.B. Smith & Associates, P.A. 10021 Westlake Drive Charlotte, NC 28273 704 - 254 -3637 4h. Email address: Ibsjr @lbsmithpa.com 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Amanda Jones 5b. Business name Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC - Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 1070 Tunnel Road, Bldg. 1 5d. City, state, zip: Asheville, NC 28805 5e. Telephone no.: 828 - 708 -7059 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: amanda.jones @wetlands - epg.com Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): I Latitude: 35.1417 1 c. Property size: 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: 20114109, 20114203 Longitude: - 80.9737 18 acres Steele Creek Class C 2c. River basin: Lower Catawba 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The site is currently used as a manufacturing facility and is composed of commercial manufacturing structures /buildings and vacant, forested property. General land use in the vicinity consists of industrial and commercial developments. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.182 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 505 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: Site development for the expansion of commercial /manufacturing structures, access and parking 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Excavation and grading of the site will use standard equipment - excavator, trackhoe, dump trucks, etc. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? E] Preliminary E] Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company: Name (if known): Nic Nelson Other: WEPG 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. USACE (William Elliott) and NCDWR (Alan Johnson) visited the site on July 22nd to verify the stream /wetland boundaries delineated by WEPG 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for I ❑Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? 6b. If yes, explain. ❑ Yes ❑X No Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply) ❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average Impact number intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. Temporary (T) 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of number S3 I Choose one Corps (404,10) or impact Permanent (P) or I Choose one DWQ (401, other) (acres) Temporary (T) S6 I Choose one W1 P Fill Headwater Wetland No Corps 0.029 W2 P Fill Headwater Wetland Yes Corps 0.034 W3 P Fill Headwater Wetland Yes Corps 0 043 W4 Choose one Choose one Yes /No W5 Choose one Choose one Yes /No W6 Choose one Choose one Yes /No 2g. Total Wetland Impacts: I 0.106 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average Impact number intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream length Permanent (P) or width (linear Temporary (T) (feet) feet) S1 Choose one S2 Choose one S3 I Choose one S4 I Choose one S5 I Choose one S6 I Choose one 3i. Comments: 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or 6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba type Temporary (T) 6b. 6c. 6d. 01 Choose one Choose O2 Choose one Choose 03 Choose one Choose 04 Choose one Choose required? 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland purpose of pond (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated P1 Choose one P2 Choose one 5f. Total: 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, tren you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other: 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer Impact Reason for impact Stream name Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2 number — mitigation impact impact Permanent (P) or required? (square (square Temporary (T) feet) feet) B1 Yes /No B2 Yes /No B3 Yes /No B4 Yes /No B5 Yes /No B6 Yes /No 6i. Comments: Page 5 of 10 6h. Total Buffer Impacts: D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Due to the location of the wetlands on the site, opportunities to avoid these areas were limited. One wetland area bisects the middle portion of the property and the remaining wetland impacts parallel the accessible roadways along the eastern and southern site boundaries. Orientation and location of the roadway crossings and stormwater outfalls were designed to limit additional fill while maintaining appropriate stormwater treatment and site access /egress requirements. No impacts to onsite jurisdictional tributaries will occur as part of this protect. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid /minimize impacts to onsite /adjacent offsite receiving conveyances 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes ❑X No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this El Payment to in -lieu fee program project? ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Type: Choose one Quantity: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Quantity: Type: Choose one Quantity: 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires Yes ❑X No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ❑X No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 86 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑X Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: Storm water on the site will be handled /treated by two large BMPs as shown on the attached plans. The stormwater plan has not been approved yet since Mecklenburg County requires a copy of the 401 certification before they will approve the stormwater plan. However, the plan as proposed meets their current guidelines and is expected to be approved once the 404/401 permits are received. 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? 3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply): 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Proqram Review 4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply): 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? Mecklenburg County Mecklenburg County ❑X Phase II ❑ NSW ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: ❑Yes ❑X No ❑Coastal counties ❑HQW ❑ORW ❑Session Law 2006 -246 ❑Other: ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project Involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ❑ Yes 0 No use of public (federal /state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State El Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, E] Yes Z No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application? El Yes 0 No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in I ❑Yes Q No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. No future impacts are anticipated as part of this protect. This protect is located within an existing industrial park that may have available outparcels for development by others in which potential impacts to additional streams are unknown but also unlikely given the topography of the surrounding area 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. Wastewater generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via installation of sewer lines. Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ❑X No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ❑X No impacts? 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. - 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? A threatened /endangered species assessment was conducted on the site in which no species was identified (report enclosed). Habitat does exist for the recently listed Northern Long Eared Bat but we believe that the project is not likely to adversely effect the bat (see narrative in cover letter) 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑X No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? No essential fish habitat in this region. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ❑X No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? SHPO's website: http / /gis.ncdcr gov /hpoweb/ 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? http: / /polaris3g .mecklenburgcountync.gov Amanda Jones for WEPG Applicant/Agent's Printed Name ❑ Yes Amanda Dig ! — Jones, Amanda Jones DN —Amanda ones, o =WEPG, ou= Leonard S Rmdner, PLLC, Wetlands %, \& Environmental Planning Group, Jones email= amanda !ones @wetlands epg com, 'c=us Date 2015 10 05 13 34 20 - 04'00' Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) Page 10 of 10 ❑X No 10 -05 -2015 Date Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Agent Authorizatibim Letter Leonard S. Rindner, "PLLC The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting. The undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable permit(s) and/or certification(s). Project/Site Name: Schaefer - Westlake Drive Site Property Address: 10021 Westlake Drive, Charlotte, NC 28273 Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 20114109 Select one: I am an interested buyer /seller Name: Larry B. Smith, Jr. P.E. (JR) Company: L.B. Smith & Associate, P.A. Mailing Address: P.O. Box 784, Monroe, NC 28111 -0784 Telephone Number: 704 - 254 -3637 (cell) Electronic Mail Address: lbsjr @lbsmithpa.com 120- 11T oiler - er /In r to Buyer* Other' Date * The Interested Buyer /Other acknowledges that an agreement and/or formal contract to purchase and/or conduct due diligence activities exists between the current property owner and the signatory of this authorization in cases where the property is not owned by the signatory. Charlotte Office: 10612•D Providence Rd. PMB $50 Charlotte, NC 28277 (704) 904 -2277 len.rindner@wedands- epg.com www.wetiands-epg.com 2 Asheville Office: 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I Suite 10. PMB 283 Asheville, NC 28805 (828) 708 -7059 amanda.lones@wetlands- epg.com CR� Ln PG Maps /Plans 34"K 00s AnraRm Fid tbp BASF Uispersiorn • tR JMrlotte IN IR 4 n Ax o � c, ® SITE ®. .•� �I o •r. D C ® X't O CD � ® k it Averrtt Express • F, —1n- SCHAEFER — WESTLAKE DR Mecklenburg Co., NC H'estinghouse Blvd Drawn By: Reviewed By: LRG LSR DATE: VICINITY MAP - WATERS OF THE U.S. EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY 9/30/15 SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VERIFICATION It i I SCHAEFER — WESTLAKE DR Mecklenburg Co., NC AERIAL MAP - WATERS OF THE U.S. EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VERIFICATION Drawn By: Reviewed By: LRG LSR 1, lr•� '! "• `• ` • �` 4L ti ` ice../' • • . r ++� 1} 7r -,: An + i t 1 •^ = • -� ,� + • ' • SITE "• -�" t• ' �l� • �_LCl i�•� l i r•....,,y • •� lY . �: • � •sue• 4, f ev LOCATION Lat: 35.1417 -N SCALE Long: - 80.9737 9W 1:24 000 H UC: 03050103 _. " i ACRES USGS QUAD `'''� •• '� LOWER CATAWBA 18.0 Charlotte West, NC i • e i FIGURE NO. SCHAEFER — WESTLAKE DR Drawn By: Reviewed By: 3 Mecklenburg Co., NC LRG LSR DATE: USGS MAP - WATERS OF THE U.S. \ EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY 8/10/15 SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VERIFICATION I rA MeB Map Unit Legend Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (NC119) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Iredell fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Iredell fine sandy loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest SCHAEFER - WESTLAKE DR Mecklenburg Co., NC Percent of AOI 4.2 26.7% 1 1 .4 71.9% 0.2 1.4% 15.8 SOILS MAP 2 - WATERS OF THE U.S. EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VERIFICATION 100.0% Drawn By: Reviewed By: LRG LSR DATE: 8/10/15 FIGURE r 6 ■ Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC. len.rindner@wetiands-epg.com (704) 904 -2271 www.wetiand s- epg.coni i WETLAND UPLAND DATA FORM CULVERT -------- ce 3 JURISDICTIONAL tar WETLAND A'�l ^S' -'`G�+ 0.029 Acres - JURISDICTIONAL i ` .► WETLAND D „mow„ 0.118 Acres PIPE 4 JURISDICTIONAL •.j_,-= JURISDICTIONAL �� - �� - � '� 6 WETLAND �`- • � WETLAND B i \� 4 0.001 Acres 0.034 Acres CULVERTS EAM REACFI' ` EVALUATION / FORM (DP9` \� JURISDICTIONAL ' 2 s ' INTERMITTENT TRIBUTARY C 505 LF /0.159 Acres V 1 1 \r. l� - - - - PIPE LEM: hip * r _ i LANDSCAPE PHOTO LOCATION AND USACE NCDENR Verification 7 22 15 DIRECTION FIGURE NO. SCHAEFER — WESTLAKE DR WEPG Drawn By: Reviewed By: 1 Mecklenburg Co., NC NRN LSR Leonard DATE: DELINEATION MAP — WATERS OF THE U.S. 8/13/15 ' EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY USACE/NCDENR _ SUBJECT TO USACE /NCDENR VERIFICATION Verification 7/22/15 Nkhity MqD (roll) LINE TABLE I Schaefer Systems International, Inc. 1 LINE BEARING LENGTH I Charlotte, NC 28241 I L1 S6322'07 "W 13.26 I fp�hQal��Jf I L2 S41'49'28 "W 31.39 Cify of lriarlatlq MeaHa7duq County, NC I L3 N26- 47'34E 133.23 I I L4 N4151'29:E 37.40 I L5 N332X13 "E 1324 I Label Length Average Width Sq. Footage N8759'22 "E 54.23 0.029 L7 S75'20b0 "E 54.08 Acres EL6 L8 S62'4518:E 56.17 0.118 I L9 574'0812"E 3800 z I L10 N58'00'18 'W 62.86 I L11 582.37'21 "W 73.20 completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manud' yRegulatory Official: m Title: U m C7 143 N 9 'n ro Date: b Q USACE Action ID No: Nkhity MqD (roll) ;URVE -ABLE Schaefer Systems International, Inc. I CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD BRG. CHORD DIST. PO Box 7009 I C1 125.70 848.51 546.52'24 "W 125.59 Charlotte, NC 28241 1 C2 252.77 848 51 534'01'36 "W 251.84 Wetland Delineation for 11W 1,15 C3 7126 250 -00 N33'39'36 "E 71.02 I fp�hQal��Jf C4 60.63 40.00 N8514'36"E 54.99 i lh&m od, hm g vpffty a a'7�• Y C5 139.43 44526 146018'32 "W 13886 I Cify of lriarlatlq MeaHa7duq County, NC C6 23412 896.06 N3624'01 "W 23345 I a::p revk ! "" IJA" [ben etreeee' R ]al! auu.r a.% u No Galt Illlr KV MEbbb AW LIYw Galt nor 15AA I C7 59.82 40.00 S01D6'457 54.40 1� g5 I CS 88.51 310.00 N3336'31 "E 88.21 * .�• o I C9 86.10 255.00 S3514'STW 8569 j I CIO 62.30 31000 N39'0561 62.19 I a I Label Length Average Width Sq. Footage Acres � I Jurisdictional Wetland "A" n \a n \o 1,245 0.029 I Jurisdictional Wetland "B' n \a n \a 1,494 0.0341 n I Jurisdictional Intermittent TTlbutary "C" 76 35 n \o Acres o I Jurisdictional Intermittent Tributav "C" 429 10 n \a Acres Jurisdictional Wetland "D" n \o n \o 5,159 0.118 I Jurisdictional Wetland "E" nor\ n \a 34 0 00011 a *This certifies that this copy of this plot accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the b undersigned on this date. Unless there is a change in the law or our published o regulations, the determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from this date The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manud' yRegulatory Official: m Title: U 'n ro Date: b Q USACE Action ID No: v Steele Creek Road - -- -- _ - -_ 60' Public R/* / (MB. 22, pg. -_ .. �1 _..... - . . N2611'SO"E 221.55' . Von Se' N26't%'21"E 114.96'. aan Fauna, �1 Iron Sat t 26y5'49'F 323.? ��" _ horn set " Iran set �- 1 t m- Jurisdictiond ' Sheet Sheet 2 GLIIy \Swde C 1,600 LF Jtnrisdktional Wetland 'A' Jurisdictional 1,245 sf. Wetland 'D" 0.029 Ae 10.0 Acres Parcel Ii 20114109 5,159 ef. 0.118 Ac. 1 Stay Schaefer System International, Inc IN Masonry Building _ Db. 589. Pg. 455 Jurisdiction I Jurisdictional i Weiland 'E Wetland 'E' 1,494 sf. 34 st 0.001 Ac. 0.034 Ac. Jurisdictional Intermittent Tributary 'C' �_ _y� C2_ 6' LF 31111 'F f� 7PG.671) F 107.85' 11269' Wee , Iron R Fand j( (MB.1) cr s \ \ 011 203 Schaefeternational, Inc Iron Found Db. 6599, Pg. 301 Jurisdictional / 1J766. Intermittent sN TOZa N h. F.nd Tributary C' "'ex• 429' LF I Tax 20114205 �7�7r ron Found Centex Land Holdings LP MB 26, Page 125 Iron Found 524.39'54"W 445.35 Iran Found / Tax 20114218 / MIAS Property U.0 Map Book 26 Page 125 / Zoning 1 -2 -15o 0 73 130 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 150 ft_ Parcel ID 20114101 Fred D. Upchurch Db. 24802, Pg 807 Iran Famd Parcel ID P114110 Scha fer System Intematrond, Inc \ Db..s 9, Pg 210 on Fo nd \ 8.02 Acres Parcel ID 20114203 Sch efer Systems International, Inc. a Db. 6581, Pg 210 Schaefer Systems International, Inc. PO Box 7009 Charlotte, NC 28241 LAWRENCE Wetland Delineation for 11W 1,15 U ASSOCIATES fp�hQal��Jf roe a �n.a x ao.,,, xew o.m oam see -em.om lh&m od, hm g vpffty a a'7�• Y r ra-swu F ro~-00 Cify of lriarlatlq MeaHa7duq County, NC I "'"1O1O�g1 - Arb Att a::p revk ! "" IJA" [ben etreeee' R ]al! auu.r a.% u No Galt Illlr KV MEbbb AW LIYw Galt nor 15AA _ JJJ L I�' L- � Fence e L33 co 1 'i N I Jurisdictional Wetland "A" w Ig 1,245 sf. / 0.029 Ac. r 10.00 Acres r Parcel ID 20114109 Schaefer Systems International Inc Q, N L29 m a N I V1 e ti This certifies that this copy of this plot accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the o undersigned on this date. Unless there is a change In the law or our published regulations, the determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for 3 a period not to exceed five (5) years from this date. The undersigned o completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to �o the 1987 U.S Armv Come of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.' Regulatory Official: 0 r Title: � Date: b °^ USACE Action ID No.: \ Db 5894, Pg. 455 Der+ LINE TABLE LINE TABLE I '\\ UNE 5632207'W LENGTH 26 I L23 N847 3CE LENGTH 52 L2 S41'4V7rW 31.39 I L24 N71'38'26'E 2.15 1 L3 N2647'34'E 133.23 L25 N89-52'10'E 1493 1 L4 N51 '39'29'E 2280 L26 563'4405 "E 881 <is\<� L5 N2152'10'E 38.39 I L27 S55'35'15'E 3.06 I L6 S34- 24'45 "W 12.86 I I L28 S78'12'17"E 17.00 I \ L7 N55'35'15'W 270 I L29 S20'38`1 2'W 6.00 Ndl4G 41 L8 N8756'14 "W 6.58 I I L30 N73'02'43"W 22.54 \ 4 tie• L9 N50'01'41'W 8.25 L31 N5872'OTW 27.86 L10 N83'18'29 "W 4.25 I L32 N59'23'21 "W 17.30 l�9 Lil S84426'34 "W 39.52 I L33 N61%12"W 28.33 L72 588'3750 "W 15.84 L34 N63'34'46'W 12.72 10.00 Acres L13 58732'39 "W 3820 1 L35 N66'Or48'W 15.81 \ Parcel ID 20114109 L14 58923'37 "W 3505 1 L36 N7216'leW 36.49 Schaefer Systems International, Inc L15 S6578'16 "W 33.49 I ( L37 N19'20''19_E 10.00 Ob. 5894, Pg. 455 L16 SB807'31 "W 34.99 1 I L38 S69'0525'E 37.37 4'0 I L17 NO152'29'W 5.00 1 I L39 S62-30.47 -E 15.90 <p \ 118 N88D7'31 "E 34.83 1 + L40 56334'46 "E 12-83 L19 N8348'15 "E 33.83 I I L41 56152'12 "E 28.59 -\ I L20 N89-23'37 "E 35.05 I I L42 55n3'21'E 1745 L21 N89T174i'E 3809 I I L43 56739.41 -E 27.71 � •. L22 N77'31'19'E 15.56 1 I L44 N46'41'01'W 53.81 Jurisdictional ` L45 S65'�6'34'E 21.17 Wetland "B" CAR ?� /1,494 ef. 0.034 AC. /( a 'Ngto \ Jurisdictional f 21 Intermittent * Tributary <. �s 76' LF C2 L274 „� L47 L48 L49 L L125 L124 Iran Faund S423�51'w L123 L1; \\i -30 0 15 30 ' LAWRENCE Wetland Delineotion for I snort l ors ASSOCIATES &%Nfw Sptms ( IN FEET) Schaefer Systems International, Inc. . °� City of Chodotta Mec4ieaburg County, Mr. 1 inch 30 it. PO Box 7009 Charlotte, INC 28241 ...".."...ram a- , -",p !b& spn- c ,as a jt u Ab Ab . M &Mft Ah AW WMft ~ s&r Avft m M44 10.00 Acres Parcel ID 20114709 Schaefer Systems Intemalionol, Inc. Db. 5894, Pg. 455 Jurisdictional o Intermittent Tributary "C" a t' 76' LF o_ •�� L46 L47 L48 L49 (q L5 L125 L50 ti t12q (51 ban Found 54232'51•W L123 U22 131.90 UZI !1 ?0 `LS\ L54 5 `� Lj / ° I S423251"w L719 \5 / V� \5 " _ L118 ti a hThis certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the Jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the a undersigned on this date. Unless there is a change in the law or our published o regulations, the determination of Section 404 Jurisdiction may be relied upon for 3 a period not to exceed five (5) years from this date The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual." ti Regulatory Official 0 t Title: � Date: e USACE Action ID No.: ti Parcel ID 20114110 Schaefer Systems International, Inc. Db. 9649, Pg. 210 OMER Schaefer Systems Intemational, Inc. PO Box 7009 Chorlotte, NC 28241 CI -� 0 is a0 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 30 ft AS8 AESII Wetland Delineotion for ASSOCIATES fpOV& $*q wr......A . mated -iea es- mr-ami r mrmrua City o /Char/oltq NecHenbuig County, N.0 ...x...o.ft— a� a V - m' Aft sir« --w ( V A.". BF �x (-- .0 Jltlt 1469 &dWv 4k 140 Ib>IE * SW Ado L oft na AM ti 0 a m 0 H 0 rn 0 e r I N a 0 3 0 U e Q a "This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the ) urisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual." Regulatory Official: Title: Date: USACE Action ID No.: Non - Jurisdictional/ Gully \Swale \� \ 1,600 LF �\ Parcel ID 20114101 Fred D. Upchurch Ob. 24802. Pg. 807 Iran Found n L84 g LB-7 I h r ry \ V \ 10.00 Aces Pared 07 20114109 Schaefer Systems International, Inc Db. 5894, Pg. 455 N rn / Parcel ID 20114110 Schaefer Systems International, Inc % Ob 9649, Pg 210 v / R • v � \25 Jurisdictional Wetland "D' 5,159 sf. 0.118 Ac� S" v e • "e / L OWNER: Schcefer Systems Intemationol, Inc. °.�SUR PO Box 7009 y'•+q(D L+ Charlotte, NC 28241 V 'brWUn Ot -so a re w rn ( IN FEET ) I inch = 30 ft. Wetland Delineation for LAWRENCE Assocw�s S(� aAr s . a�A n>'twW&M4 /nd pmPalr r mr-ar es -m-ami r naru -m+ City at Charlotte, Mecdenbnrg County, N.0 - ...+..�.+ft- aq r r ",iV Arr so 4 M5 an. ear 40 AL4 MR baelb Ak 14W SMP* 9ud Lab beds an 15AA LINE TABLE LINE BEARING LENGTH L44 N48'41'01'W 53.81 L45 S65'26'34"E 21.17 L46 1,15T49'45"W 3.00 L47 N3710'15'E 5.29 1 L48 N33'44'27 E 19.82 1 L49 N3859'38"E 17.63 I L50 N3945'19'E 15.77 I L51 N4720'23 "E 24.97 I L52 N4502'51'E 19.10 I L53 N4637'06'E 24.87 I L54 N3657'15"E 1209 I L55 N4655'35 "E 23.41 I L56 1,11009'41 "E 18.62 I L57 N12'48'52 "E 27.67 I L58 NDB06'10 "W 16.52 L59 N1652'32 "W 13.90 L60 N21'39'41 "W 8.30 L61 N30'32'34"W 25.60 L62 N3638'25"W 27.20 L63 N3320'35"W 32.75 L64 N38.50'42"W 9.50 L65 N3853'10"W 31.61 L66 N4018'41 "W 17.82 I L67 N4019'06 "W 3095 L68 N40'33'06 "W 3629 L69 N3934'32 "W 1099 L70 N3256'57 "W 15.21 L71 N3625'57 "W 3037 L72 N35'41'14"W 1737 L73 N38'40'57 "W 6.00 L74 N4351'51 "W 16.62 1 L75 N39'4SI6 "W 2151 1 L76 µ4003'54W 26.62 L77 N4200'59 "W 15.12 L78 N5422'31 "W 17.89 L79 N63'4Y71 "W 11.78 LBO N60'033 "W 13.96 L81 N7634'36W 469 L82 N1325'24"E 4.44 L83 N430B'08 "E 1815 L84 N4308'08 "E 5.36 "This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the ) urisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual." Regulatory Official: Title: Date: USACE Action ID No.: Non - Jurisdictional/ Gully \Swale \� \ 1,600 LF �\ Parcel ID 20114101 Fred D. Upchurch Ob. 24802. Pg. 807 Iran Found n L84 g LB-7 I h r ry \ V \ 10.00 Aces Pared 07 20114109 Schaefer Systems International, Inc Db. 5894, Pg. 455 N rn / Parcel ID 20114110 Schaefer Systems International, Inc % Ob 9649, Pg 210 v / R • v � \25 Jurisdictional Wetland "D' 5,159 sf. 0.118 Ac� S" v e • "e / L OWNER: Schcefer Systems Intemationol, Inc. °.�SUR PO Box 7009 y'•+q(D L+ Charlotte, NC 28241 V 'brWUn Ot -so a re w rn ( IN FEET ) I inch = 30 ft. Wetland Delineation for LAWRENCE Assocw�s S(� aAr s . a�A n>'twW&M4 /nd pmPalr r mr-ar es -m-ami r naru -m+ City at Charlotte, Mecdenbnrg County, N.0 - ...+..�.+ft- aq r r ",iV Arr so 4 M5 an. ear 40 AL4 MR baelb Ak 14W SMP* 9ud Lab beds an 15AA LINE TABLE LINE BEARING LENGTH L85 S5453'31'E 3.00 L86 S2704'50 "W 6.71 L87 S2704'50 "W 980 L.88 S60'47'33 "E 1019 L89 $6347'11 "E 12.29 L90 S5422'31 "E 1863 L91 S39'23b1 "E 1730 L92 S40T1,Y54'E 26.68 L93 539'43'16 "E 21.24 L94 S4351'51 "E 16.69 L95 S38'4a'57'E 6.57 L96 S35'41'14'E 1753 L97 S3625 -57 "E 30.56 L98 S32'56'57'E 15.46 L99 54542'32 "E 9.82 1_100 S40'33'06'E 36.46 L101 $40'19'06 "E 30.96 L102 S4018'41'E 17.94 L103 S38'53'10'E 31.72 L104 S38'50'42 "E 9.93 L105 S3320'35 "E 32.92 L106 S36'38'WE 27.58 Ll07 S23'58'51 'E 9.03 L108 S2358'51 "E 1800 L109 S21'39'41'E 8.55 LI10 S1 652'32'E 1167 Lill N8329'34E 7.16 L112 S12'38'15'E 3.87 L113 S7113'55 "W 7.36 L114 50508 -09-E 1548 L115 S12'48'52 "W 2840 L116 S1009'41'W 20.16 L117 $4655'35 "W 24.63 L118 S3657'15'W 1202 L119 54419'41 "W 25.05 L120 S4205'41 "W 19.43 L121 S4502'44'W 2497 L122 S4323'16'W 14.96 Ll23 53859'38 "W 1751 L124 S4521'30'W 19.73 L125 S3710'15'W 5.29 L126 S1028'58�E 5.42 "This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the ) urisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual." Regulatory Official: Title: Date: USACE Action ID No.: Non - Jurisdictional/ Gully \Swale \� \ 1,600 LF �\ Parcel ID 20114101 Fred D. Upchurch Ob. 24802. Pg. 807 Iran Found n L84 g LB-7 I h r ry \ V \ 10.00 Aces Pared 07 20114109 Schaefer Systems International, Inc Db. 5894, Pg. 455 N rn / Parcel ID 20114110 Schaefer Systems International, Inc % Ob 9649, Pg 210 v / R • v � \25 Jurisdictional Wetland "D' 5,159 sf. 0.118 Ac� S" v e • "e / L OWNER: Schcefer Systems Intemationol, Inc. °.�SUR PO Box 7009 y'•+q(D L+ Charlotte, NC 28241 V 'brWUn Ot -so a re w rn ( IN FEET ) I inch = 30 ft. Wetland Delineation for LAWRENCE Assocw�s S(� aAr s . a�A n>'twW&M4 /nd pmPalr r mr-ar es -m-ami r naru -m+ City at Charlotte, Mecdenbnrg County, N.0 - ...+..�.+ft- aq r r ",iV Arr so 4 M5 an. ear 40 AL4 MR baelb Ak 14W SMP* 9ud Lab beds an 15AA \ Jurisdictional 01 �� \ LINE TABLE OWNER 'This certifies that this copy of this plot accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the Intermittent nt Intermittent \` Sc Systems temat al, Inc. undersigned on this dote Unless there is a change m the low or our published Tributary .} •\i BEARING PO Box 7009 Charlotte, ox NC 2824 regulations. the determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from this date. The undersigned T7 76' LF m ' S2152'10'W completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to Delineation Manual." 16 _ rg l r T15 ~� \ : T9 <, r10 Tll 10.11 6.00 Acres \� the 1987 U S Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Regulatory Official: C2 r14 ��. % 22.80 T37 \� 682 ? T4 � T r TT} rl2 Schaefer Systems Intern t al, In T3 \ \ Title: Iran read S4T3? '51-W 1 31,90' 12.77 \ Date. USACE Action N No.: III I II Y I II Ir Iron I I I I 'I Found - - Iron -... _... CIO on Found 5 eadWall r18� - - -->f" ------------------------ m n h h Q, 6.00 Acres m Parcel ID 20114203 Nd�p�+ �q5 Schaefer Systems International, Inc o v+.6 tie. Db. 6599, Pg. 601 h Jurisdictional s Intermittent y Tributary V e 429' LF m -so o +s so 0 U e ( IN FEET ) I inch = 30 ft. ti 8.02 Acres Parcel ID 20114203 Schaefer Systems International, IncG Db. 6581, Pg. 210 o LINE TABLE LINE TABLE \` LINE BEARING LENGTH I LINE BEARING LENGTH 8.02 AC T1 S2152'10'W 38.39 T36 S84'2337"E 10.11 6.00 Acres \� Parcel m 20114 3 T2 S51'39'Z9; W 22.80 T37 S672353'E 682 Parcel ID 20114203 A % Schaefer Systems Intern t al, In T3 S34'24!WW 7 T7 T38 S44'00'12'E 12.77 Schaefer Systems Intema lonal, Inc Db. 6581, Pg. 2 T4 S3424'45W 4.03 T39 S65'02�37E 17.77 Db 6599, Pg. 601 I T5 N6292'30'W 616 T40 56647'01 "E 17.34 ` I T6 N16'0i407 1,194 I T41 S73'31'56'E 19.56 I T7 N25'tr46 "E 1019 I T42 S7752'2eE 12.17 I T8 N47'48'47'E 22.58 I T43 S83'06:53;E 629 I T9 N3453'DS "E 15.31 I T44 S7553'43 "E 6.09 i I TIO N4544'18"E 1157 I T45 S2C39'54'W 5.12 I 111 S52'49'45'E 3.00 I T46 S24'39'S4"W 3.02 \ I T12 S45'34'37'W 11.73 I T47 N75'5S43'W 4.09 I TI3 53453'5'W 15.34 I T48 N83'06'S3'W 6.15 l } I T14 S4554'30 "W 2145 T49 N7752'24'W 12.84 I I TI5 S25'46'00 "W 8 BB T50 N73'31'56'W 20.33 I I T16 S16'33'04 "W 11.33 1 1 T51 N6647'01;W 17.94 I T17 562'I2'30"E 3.47 T52 N65'02'3Y'W 1938 1 I T18 N4657'37"E 6517 I T53 I N44'00'12 "W 12.60 I 1 T19 H4557'58 "W 803 1 I T54 N6723'53'W 3.97 Jurisdictional } I T20 N2914141 21.15 I I T55 N8423'37'W 10.24 I Intermittent I T21 S93"25'03 *E 13.70 I I T56 N65'34'17'W 1367 Tributary "C" /� ' +° Q •C %� ` / / 12.84 I I T58 24.05 429' LF I T23 �� S/ ''• SB9'501'38'E N86'02'26'W i� QPO I T24 S8726'10'E 24.23 I I T59 N8727 -31 "W 29.76 N I ! S } T25 586'21_'38 "E 24.94 1 I T60 N85'36'00'W 37.71 T26 T27 S86'10'47'E S84'07'27"E 27.74 T61 2265 T62 N86'43'10'W N86'46'53'W 26.56 28.48 .� •.., qyE��,+' �• I T'28 �$ SB9'07'48"E "E 13.71 T63 1,189'07'40 13.94 LAw tom. T29 I SB6'46'53 28.69 T64 N84'07'27'W "W 22.91 t T30 586'43'10 "E 2653 I T65 N8670'47 27.37 131 SBIrM34"E 3761 I T66 N8821'3B'W 24.83 I T32 S8777'31 "E 29.91 I T67 N8776'10'W 2410 I T33 S86'02',?q "E 24.20 I T68 N8951'38 "11? 12.63 I v10 s I T34 568'02736 1770 I T69 S5B14'22*W 9.21 I T35 S65'34'17"E 1294 I T70 5597522 "W 14.2B 1 A A 747 LAWRENCE Wetland 0elineotion for T46 \ T45 ' ASSOCIATES Sal ft v s 442.33' Total) "E 415.35' ( °L•"° ..... wn aw mx: Qykm�J Nwty `��b /QG N24'39'S4 .+a -zaoa ex -sr�i rn�m -ma A7y of GYraiotfg Mecklenburg Carroty, N o scnmer r, Ana ~ rr - .M Ab +'4110011 Avaft Atr 14e16 A11Iq J JW 2etm Aaelra nn 1'J,ITA a • g •B' PACTS �TLQND "A SEE SHEET NU _RS 3 S 4 PACT TYPE PIPE UNDER PROPOSED BUILDING AND PARKING l IM OT m�' c l I C\ 5 �;Y I NT NATRfONA'_ ENC- 08 100 ACRES Y e ' I WESTLAKE DRIVE— PARCEL 10 1Y8lEM5 ERNATfONAI, INC / \\ t X WFTIAND "O'IMPACT S£E SHEET NUMBER 5 IMPACT TYPE CULVERT CROSSING AT ORIVENIAY 7 %,FTI.ANO'D" IMPAQZT SEE SHEET NUMBER 4 CROSSTY A DRIVEWAY CROSSING i a/ - --I 2W Ozo W4� KC3v�ipQ Ail mWaB3g V Z J O N �Nr mo Lu off aZ az'j XN;W H ul Y �cTt,AMD a '4 'D" IMPACT sii 5 cc MPACTETYP UR PRAP APRON W 3> 55 151Hd AC) IATES PER LAWRENCE ASSOC FINAL WETLAND DELINEA1IO DATE 919115 N NO ul LL. W N N App TRACKING m r 4N��r 0 WETLAND "A'& "B" IMPACTS iw I SEE SHEET NUMBERS 3 & 4 __ __ __ __ _ _ -_ __ - _ __ W Q" IMPACT TYPE PIPE UNDER PROPOSED %" — — - WETLAND "D" IMPACT pyU 1 \ -- —�- BUILDING AND PARKING LOT - s' ��,� SEE SHEET NUMBER 6 �(7y I e = II _ STEELE CREEK ROAD C IMPACT TYPE CULVERT :)Zw g (�2Z PGgr2)- CROSSING AT DRIVEWAY mWa 3 1 03 NOW JURISDICTIONAL DITCH / TO BE PIPED UNDER PROPOSED \� l 1 / ) _, • l �` r / BERM ALONG STEELE CREEK RD \ \� ��_ _ '/� . 1 S (/�"'�- _ / 1 - �J - - / \ \\\ \ \ \\ ` J \ "I �VJ l� J ! 1 Z I / ✓ 41 `\ 0 m $ X111 II I� I —� / \ /i / 1 c%l a amp Qz- 111�O �! /!� W W 3 \ IV, PARCEL ID 20114109 ' �I Q Q 'II \ /! / .l !. / 1 a 1 �' / ,I /' . / z W 90 / INTERNATIONAL, INC 1 �Q ", 1 ` I I _ _ DB 5894, PG 455 1 + �/ { i 'i _ \ ��I I t\ / ( I� --1l/ l ` i \ I _""_ - / / / / 1 / " \°b� r a it Z cl) 1 j 1000 ACRES R' �I it . •. ti l J 1 �' _ x IL I N W v/ ¢3 IJ I /III I Ij ` ��j /�� ` / Z // i i L��' o \ \� 1 /�� - A _ /�• 1 a / W o LL Lu WESTLAKEDRIVE- IT l i V cn Q \ WETLAND "D" IMPACT e / \ j '� �. -- s T- - - - - - \�iga�i -� � �� •�i _ ' \ I APP TRACKING # SEE SHEET NUMBER 5 IMPACT TYPE' RIPRAP APRON �W - -- J L11, I L I I I I I Its I I v vv v �Av o� '�4 vv`' ;�, ��v SCALE 1 -80' £ y 1 C \ \ "SX WETLAND "D" IMPACT � z SEE SHEET NUMBER 5 a, � � co \ i •`aay44'y} �`�-," ` I \ \ \\ �\ s l r �' r e.�- t-e�`%"•-r.?x,= e v sr..'„2 I I \ \� \� \ \� a,\ IMPACT TYPE CULVERT uw� w w O r �\ �t� '•�.� �`' �_, L I\e VAC A \ \V� /� (� CROSSING AT DRIVEWAY a O w o �i a � N 0190011 K9 vi M,zv ° 636 - ll / �- ✓ i / / I // /� / /// /� —635 /I I ! � 1 / �"iy= �" •.,,,w Z J; B-A3 / � -' I PROP 14' OF CLASS A GRATE:631.85 — p / RIPRAP APRON 6� — WETLAND "A" IMPACT o- T = 9- INCHES Q N INV IN 626.5218' RCP ti Z \ / 1.245 -SF (0 029 AC) �✓ /= r �`" — ;t'L °': �/ / / //� `O �'�� / Z wu —INV OUT:626.421 B' RCP \ / I 6418' RCP J / _ n / / \ !/ 2 u o 635— - — — =-i -1' 630 z � J /// '�•, �� /// ; / 'b°j ;�� Q z W Ca o 633- -235LF / 122LF- �� 'i // %• \ / / \1 z Z = r = 1 B' RCP 0.50% -18- RCP @ 0.50%- '— '�A V m l \ 632 / �� ✓ i 63 - - - - ice /';:::, _ /� , x v' > RIM:632.09 / INV IN:626.61 18' RCP / \ � � � \ � � � ��i /� - �� ^ ��n r,� � - � l I / / ` i � p Y Q �NV OUT:626.6 18' RCP // v 17 LF' / /lf%�i rr.,, ^. - ✓ , �� // / / a 1 u o emu'' °'_, v v '" (4 5 p 18' RCP @ 0.50% _: - \ WETLAND "B "IMPACT // / j 1.494 -SF (0 034 AC) / } W Z JB-A2 //i / ./ / / y 3 Q RIM 635.80, // // / �/ / i - J $ INV IN:625.2518' RCP IV OUT:625.2518' RC :r titi W W JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND 3 1,245 -SF (0 029 AC) 1 �t9 / / / % I / / / Q / l // LL PER LAWRENCE ASSOCIATES :(v e(,°J6: l // / , W / FINAL WETLAND DELINEATION \ JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND "B" DATE 9/9/15 s£g \ 1,494 -SF (0 034 AC)� PER LAWRENCE ASSOCIATES j //A FINAL WETLAND DELINEATION / �y �A DATE 9/9/15 // V/ APP TRACKING# SCALE 1- =47 O 1 _ 4�aW 633- -ov�'i (� rn ? a FACILITY EXPANSION FOR rn PT601I RO Ck10 $ rn N SHEET P. I W wa nuaEna 40F6 2, g A O O O 66 O Q N j CA O t O i - O I I5 71 FES -A 1 RIM /GRATE 627.85 _INV IN 624 64 18" PCP 0 n 0 �I \ \\ S°D� u = m D p0 Im N Z 0r p N D V N c Z C3 m O a �,r O a A n 1 I. I' Jo-A2 -' RIM/GRATE:635.60 ' INV IN 625 25 18" RCP - INV OUT 62C 25 18" R(.P t O I I N I O� f I I FO z �N _1 Om N N o W ':17-r I Z 0 0 6) �T m O m .I O � 1 I � I I 1 1 1 1 i N n � � I a JB -A3 t - RIM /GRATE. 631.85_ - C) INV IN 626 52 18" RCP INV OUT 62642 18" RC' RIM/GRATE: 632 09 INV IN 626 61 18 "RCP 1�u INV OUT 626 61 18" RCP t `A C-) w N -4 N (r O (l O 0 O N O N O DATE. 09/29/2015 „A o ? a FACILITY EXPANSION FOR BURTON PT601I RO Ck10 $ SCHAEFER SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. ENGINEERING ASSO CIATE S SHEET P. I 10021 WESTLAKE DRIVE - CHARLOTTE, NC - 28273 wa nuaEna 40F6 2, g I � WETLAND "A" & "B" IMPACTS - PROFILE III i III i \ is i WETLAND -D-'- — — — — — � ,0 l I��I//3 13 0 / I / II I'I II I I ill I WETLAND "D" IMPACT #2 / i I 446-SF (0 010 AC) :III it I JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND "D" 5,159 -SF 1118 AC) \ PER LAWRENCE ASSOCIATES / FINAL WETLAND DELINEATION \ DATE 9/9/15 \6, �0 739 -SF (0 017 AC) - - - - - ��— '� f6 %��iaTth;::3' - ,;i;' — — i i //' � •i ///1� �... / // \ l \ II \ \ - - I ;I _.— II \ \\ PROP 30' OF CLASS _— RIPRAP APRON . —_ _ —_ _ . — _ _ — — — _— — _— T = 9- INCHES _ _ —628 _ — — — — — iW OUT::622.9106" RCP \ '-6289 - - -- -_-- HW-B1- 2s = I W IN -622 70 36" RCP J WESTLAKE DRIVE- IiAN VARIES — _ / TWO (2) 53 LF7 ' (Me 22, PO 671 ) s -- 1136 " RCP @0.50 %�-i -�_ c7y z w¢ Ozo mwa C 32.5 V Z W 640.0 a —640 J J _ _ 0 ' � co Z m -86375 Q ^ a N N N U) myy Go �f7 ` N r Fro mOz NFL m0D I Z Q UQ 3�> 3V0635.0 Z WJ Ir Lu xz? =z? 532.5 z LU 9 O j.- a ?Z =ot1 U r a � I x U) Uj 630.0 330 u,' . ¢ ccV 0 �Lu. LLN5275 g� N _ ' N3� - - -1 6250 TWO (2) 53 LF dF o In oZ sD°ra_ -- W Q LL J —x22.5 W w Q / 3 620.0 C20 / `TRACKING PROP 30' OF CLASS A APP tt RIPRAP APRON T= 9- INCHES X17.5 SAW _ _ 2 SCALE 1' = CO' 615_ VE VE ti SCALE 1' =1' 0+ 25 0 +25 0 +00 0+50 ays 1 +)015 SCALE 1•=16 0 1— 41 W ^w� LL LLi ° ¢ a In o/nvt \ \ I I _.. .Jlii� II 7--. T FACILITY EXPANSION FOR SCHAEFER SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. � \ » SHEET# N O W ' - -- — - I — — — - v 63 O O 6 01 p o_ Q A + A� pZ�� p -631- \ 0yo o m A6 "1 � - -u0r Ni0 n \ \ 63o El) D \ Z D D O 0ern + m0� DATE 09/29/2015 SCALE: 1" =40' PROJECT #617001 T FACILITY EXPANSION FOR SCHAEFER SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. /' I- BURTON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES SHEET# N O W G of G I O v O O 6 01 p o_ Q A + � -0 � - -u0r I Z D D O 0ern + m0� U1Z D O I L o, Hlh -C1 m NCDOT STD.# 838.01 c _ INV IN 62690363 RCP r HW -C2 + NCDOT STD.# 838.01 -' INV OUT 627 43 36" RCP � 0 J + �.Np Q e -n T j 1 O N W N v N 9" V (WT A N O N O N O U O 0 O UN DATE 09/29/2015 SCALE: 1" =40' PROJECT #617001 n ,. I; � FACILITY EXPANSION FOR SCHAEFER SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. /' I- BURTON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES SHEET# I x 10021 WESTLAKEDRIVE -- CHARLOTTE, NC -28273 G of G I WETLAND "D" IMPACT #3 - PLAN & PROFILE O A� r-r O t_ n� O� 1 AU Al fD CD 3 A� O jurisdictional Determination Information TOTAL SITE ACREAGE 18 TOTAL WATERS OF THE US ACREAGE 0.22 TOTAL UPLAND ACRES 17.78 NOTES Table 1: WOUS Summary Table Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner. PLLC. O SCHAEFER - WESTLAKE DRIVE APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AND STREAM DIMENSIONS JURISDICTIONAL JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS Sq Ft Acres STREAMS/TRIBUTARIES LF Acres Jurisdictional Wetland A 1245 0.029 Jurisdictional Intermittent Tributary C 505.00 0.04 Jurisdictional Wetland B 1494 0.034 Jurisdictional Wetland D 5159 0 118 Jurisdictional Wetland E 34 0 001 Total Jurisdictional Wetlands 7932 0.182 Total Jurisdictional Streams /Tributaries 505 0.04 Total Jurisdictional Streams /Tributaries 505 0.04 TOTAL SITE ACREAGE 18 TOTAL WATERS OF THE US ACREAGE 0.22 TOTAL UPLAND ACRES 17.78 NOTES Table 1: WOUS Summary Table Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner. PLLC. O � �. wrvi.rct 1 t urvtU Ui i LH PHOTO 2: INTERMITTENT TRIBUTARY C Wetlands and Ernironmental Planning Group Schaefer — Westlake Dr Mecklenburg Co., NC — 7/4/15 Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC. S� �'. � f �� _ ~ � • rte' i H y ,�~Y r_ D i l a b Ire darl * W D PHOTO 5: JURIISDICTIONAL WETLAND A PHOTO 6: JURIISDICTIONAL WETLAND E Schaefer — Westlake Dr Mecklenburg Co., NC — 7/9/15 Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner. PLLC. STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM Date: 8/13/15 1 Evaluator: I NRN, LSR Eastin . - 80.9737 W Project: I Schaefer - Westlake Dr: Intermittent Tributary C Northin : 35.1417 N Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30* 22.0 (right-click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points) A. Geomorphology Absent Weak I Moderate Strong SCORE la. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 2 2. Sinuosity of channel aJ n thg alweg 0 1 2 3 0 3. In- channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence 0 1 2 3 2 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 1 5. Active /relic floodplain 0 1 2 3 0 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 1 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 0 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 2 9. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 0 Geomorphology Subtotal a Man -made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual B. Hydrology 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 1 13. Iron Oxidizina Bar:teria 0 1 2 3 0 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 1 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5 17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 0 Hydrology Subtotal, C. Biology 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 2 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 3 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 0 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 0 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 1 23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 1 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW= 1.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0 0 Biology Subtotal * perennial ±reams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual. Notes: Heavily urbanized stream. Adapted from NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their I (version 4.11) Origins. WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: Schaefer - Westlake Dr City /County: Charlotte /Mecklenburg Sampling Date- 8/13/15 Applicant/Owner L B Smith & Associates, P A. Investigator(s)- NRN, LSR Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) valley Subregion (LRR or MLRA). MLRA 136 Lat, Soil Map Unit Name: IrB. Iredell fine sandy loam Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical fc Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology = Are Vegetation Soil ' or Hydrology = State NC Sampling Point: Wetland B Section, Township, Range: Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope ( %) 1 -8 35 1417 N Long: - 80.9737 W Datum. NWI classification - )r this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks ) significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes F—v/] No = naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No Yes= No = Yes= No = Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Remarks Representative Wetland Data Form for Wetland A, D and E. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aaDly) =Surface Water (Al) =True Aquatic Plants (1314) =High Water Table (A2) =Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) =Saturation (A3) =Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) =Water Marks (61) =Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) =Sediment Deposits (132) =Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) =Drift Deposits (63) =Thin Muck Surface (C7) =Algal Mat or Crust (134) Other (Explain in Remarks) =Iron Deposits (135) =Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) =Water- Stained Leaves (139) =Aquatic Fauna (613) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes= No= Depth (inches), 211 Yes No Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired) [�Surface Soil Cracks (136) =]Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) =Prainage Patterns (610) =Moss Trim Lines (1316) =Dry- Season Water Table (C2) =Crayfish Burrows (C8) =Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) =Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) =Geomorphic Position (D2) =Shallow Aquitard (D3) =Microtopographic Relief (D4) =FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Water Table Present? Yes= No= Depth (inches) 0 "- Saturation Present? Yes= No= Depth (inches): 011- Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Wetland B US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 35 Y FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: g (A) 2 Salix nigra 30 Y OBL N FAC FACU species x 4 = 4. Total Number of Dominant 3 Acer rubrum 20 Y FAC g Species Across All Strata. (B) 4. Prevalence Index = B/A = 7. Percent of Dominant Species 5. 65 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. 100% (A/B) 6. ) 01 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 Comus amomum 7 Y FACW 02 - Dominance Test is >50% 2. Prevalence Index worksheet: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 85 = Total Cover Total % Cover of: MUItIDIV bv. Saolina Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) OBL species x 1 = 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 35 Y FACW FACW species x 2 = 2 Salix nigra 20 Y OBL FAC species x 3 = 3 Acer rubrum 10 N FAC FACU species x 4 = 4. UPL species x 5 = 5 Column Totals: (A) (B) 6. Prevalence Index = B/A = 7. 65 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 01 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 Comus amomum 15 Y FACW 02 - Dominance Test is >50% 2. Q3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0' 3 Q4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 4 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) OProblematic 5. Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 6. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 7. be present, unless disturbed or problematic 30' 15 = Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1 Juncus effusus 45 Y FACW Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 2 Carex stricta 20 Y OBL approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH) 3 Typha latifolia 20 Y OBL 4 Boehmeria cylindrica 15 N FACW Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less 5. than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. 6. Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 7. approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. 8. 9 Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody 10. plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 11 ft (1 m) in height 12. Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height. 100 = Total Cover Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1. 2. 3. 4 Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. Present? Yes= No= = Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet ) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point Wetland B Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks 0 -16 5YR 4/1 90 5YR 5/8 10 RM M Clay 'Type. C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. Hydric Soil Indicators: =Histosol (Al) =Histic Epipedon (A2) =Black Histic (A3) =Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) =Stratified Layers (A5) =2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) =Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) =Thick Dark Surface (Al2) =Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) =Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) =Sandy Redox (S5) =Stripped Matrix (S6) 2Location: PL =Pore Lininq, M= Matrix Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': =Dark Surface (S7) =2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) =Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) =Coast Prairie Redox (A16) =Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) =Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) =Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) =Depleted Matrix (173) =Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 136, 147) =Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) =Depleted Dark Surface (F7) =Other (Explain in Remarks) =Redox Depressions (F8) =Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) =Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) =Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) =Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No = US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: Schaefer - Westlake Dr City /County: Chadotte /Mecklenburg Sampling Date 8/13/15 Applicant/Owner: L B Smith & Associates, P. A State. NC Sampling Point. Data Point B Investigator(s): NRN, LSR Section, Township, Range Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) valley Local relief (concave, convex, none) concave Slope ( %): 1 -g Subregion (LRR or MLRA) MLRA 136 Lat. 35.1417 N Long. - 80.9737 W Datum Soil Map Unit Name IrB: Iredell fine sandy loam NWI classification. Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes= No= Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No 0 Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No �✓ Remarks: Data point taken approximately 30' NE of Wetland B. Representative Upland Data Form for Wetland A, D and E. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired, check all that aoDly) =1surface Soil Cracks (B6) =Surface Water (Al) =True Aquatic Plants (1314) =]Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) =High Water Table (A2) =Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) E=Dramage Patterns (610) =Saturation (A3) =Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) =Moss Trim Lines (B16) =Water Marks (B1) =Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) =Dry- Season Water Table (C2) =Sediment Deposits (62) =Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) =Crayfish Burrows (C8) =Drift Deposits (B3) =Thin Muck Surface (C7) =Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) =Algal Mat or Crust (B4) =Other (Explain in Remarks) =Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) =Iron Deposits (135) =Geomorphic Position (D2) =Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) =Shallow Aquitard (D3) =Water- Stained Leaves (139) =Microtopographic Relief (D4) =Aquatic Fauna (B13) =FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes= No= Depth (inches): - Water Table Present? Yes= No= Depth (inches): - Saturation Present? Yes= No= Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No IZI - (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Data Point B US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Linodendron tulipifera 35 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 1 (A) 2 Ulmus alata 30 Y FACU Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: 7 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5• That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 14% (A/B) 6 Prevalence Index worksheet: 7 65 = Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multioly bv- Saolinq Stratum (Plot size 30' ) OBL species x 1 = 1 Ulmus alata 20 Y FACU FACW species x 2 = 2 Liriodendron tulipifera 5 Y FACU FAC species x 3= 3. FACU species x 4 = 4, UPL species x 5 = 5. Column Totals (A) (B) 6. Prevalence Index = B/A = 7 25 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 30' = Total Cover 01 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Shrub Stratum (Plot size. 1 Liqustrum /aponicum 45 Y UPL 02 - Dominance Test is >50% 2. 03 - Prevalence Index is :53.01 04 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 3 4. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 5 _ 6 ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 7. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 30' 45 = Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Herb Stratum (Plot size � 1 Andropogon virginicus 30 Y FACU Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 2 Tridens flava 15 Y FACU approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). 3 Fetuca spp. 30 Y UPL 4 Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less 5. than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. 6. Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 7 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. 8 9 Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody 10. plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 11. ft (1 m) in height. 12 Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height 75 = Total Cover Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 1 Lonicera japonica 30 Y FAC 2. 3. 4 Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. Present? Yes= No= 30 = Total Cover Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet ) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Data Point B Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc` Texture Remarks 0-4 5YR 4/4 100 Loamy Clay 4 -12 5YR 5/8 100 Clay 'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: =Histosol (Al) =Dark Surface (S7) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': =2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) = Histic Epipedon (A2) =Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) =Coast Prairie Redox (A16) =Black Histic (A3) =Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) =Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) =Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) =Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) =Stratified Layers (A5) =2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) =Depleted Matrix (F3) = Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 136, 147) =Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) =Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) =Depleted Dark Surface (F7) =Other (Explain in Remarks) =Thick Dark Surface (Al2) = Redox Depressions (F8) =Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, =Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) =Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) =Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and =Sandy Redox (S5) =Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, =Stripped Matrix (S6) =Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No 0✓ Remarks. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 m C' ru Q' n � r� . ca m CD m O� n n S rD Pi r+ n m Threatened & Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species Survey For Shaefer Site Mecklenburg County, North Carolina By: Lisa R. Gaffney August 27, 2015 Cherlptpe oNlx: .��.� www.wed� ids -�&� 10612 -D Providence Rd. PP9B MO CN rkrft NC 28277 p04) 904 -7277 MAW J :..t.nds4R8 own Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC. Asheville OM= 1070 Tunnel Rd, BId& I 5uin 10, PMB 263 AWwAIe, NC INC @A 708.7059 emanda. Shaefer Site — Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation GENERAL LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION: The Shaefer site (18 acres) is located just east of Steele Creek Road and north of Westinghouse Commons Drive in Charlotte, North Carolina. It can be found on the Charlotte West USGS Topographic Quadrangle Map; latitude is 35.1417 N, longitude is 80.9737 W. The site consists of two highly disturbed industrial park lots with mixed pine /juniper /hardwood stands; overgrown scrub /shrub /mixed herb semi -open areas; and landscaped and mowed /trimmed edges along the roads and neighboring lots. The topography consists of flat upland with the elevation ranging from 630 to640. (Figure 1). Figure 1: ILL \-ll7 I- R'''1 iJ. 4 't \mil• t LOCATION F++ Lat: 35.1417 4N SCALE Long: - 80.97372W 1:24,000 HUC:03b50103 ACRES USGS QUAD _- N LOWER CATAWBA _ 38.D Charlotte West, NC � A FIGURE NO. l SCHAEFER — WESTLAKE DR Drawn By Reviewed by: i I Mecklenburg Co., NC LRG 158 i DATE PI' USGS MAP— WATERS OF THE U.S. EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY 8/10115 • SUIVECT TO USICE/NCOENR VERIFICATION WEPG 2 Wetlands and EmTlronmental Planning Group LeDnard S. Rindner, PLLC. Shaefer Site — Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation METHODOLOGY: The US Fish and Wildlife Service website httD: / /www.fws.aov /endangered/ was referenced to determine the occurrence of Threatened, Endangered and Protected species for Mecklenburg County North Carolina, the results of which are listed below (Table 1). Maps and aerial photographs were assembled and the site was investigated on August 24, 2014. Table 1: Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species listed for Mecklenburg County Countv: Mecklenbura. NC *Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service * *Data search on August 24, 2015 Group Name Status Lead Office Clams Carolina heelsDlitter Endangered Asheville Ecological (Lasmioona decorata) Services Field Office Flowering Endangered Raleigh Ecological Smooth coneflower (Echinacea Plants laevi ata ) Services Field Office Flowering Schweinitz's sunflower Endangered Asheville Ecological Plants (Helianthus schweinitzii) Services Field Office Flowering Michaux's sumac (Rhus Endangered Raleigh Ecological Plants michauxii) Services Field Office Mammals Northern Lono -Eared Bat Threatened Twin Cities Ecological (Mvotis sententrionalis) Services Field Office Birds Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus Protected Great Lakes -Big Rivers leucocephalus) under the Bald Region (Region 3) and Golden Eagle Protection Act 3 Wetlands and Ernlronmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC. Shaefer Site — Threate»ed/Endaagered /Protected Species Evaluation Three plant species with federal protection were included in the survey efforts: Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzh), listed as Federally Endangered, is typically found in open habitats which historically have been maintained by wildfires and grazing bison and elk herds. Now most occurrences are limited to roadsides, woodland and field edges, and utility rights -of -way (ROW). • Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata), listed as Federally Endangered, is typically found in open woods, cedar barrens, roadsides, clear cuts, dry limestone bluffs and power line rights -of -way, requiring abundant sunlight and little competition from other plant species. • Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxil), listed as Federally Endangered, requires habitat of sandy forests and woodland edges. This species requires periodic fire as a part of its ecology. A total of three animal species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in Mecklenburg County: Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, typically inhabits forested areas near large bodies of open water such as lakes, marshes, seacoasts and rivers, where there are suitable fish populations and tall trees for nesting and roosting. • Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), listed as Federally Endangered, is restricted to cool, clean, well- oxygenated water. Stable, silt- free stream beds are required for this species. Typically stable areas occur where the stream banks are well- vegetated with trees and shrubs. • Northern Long -eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis), listed as Federally Threatened. During summer, northern long -eared bats roost singly or in colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees. Males and non - reproductive females may also roost in cooler places, like caves and mines. It has also been found, rarely, roosting in structures like barns and sheds. Northern long -eared bats spend winter hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula. 4 Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC. Shaefer Site — Thi°eatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation RESULTS: The site consists of two highly disturbed industrial park lots with mixed pine /juniper /hardwood stands; overgrown scrub /shrub /mixed herb semi -open areas; and landscaped and mowed /trimmed edges along the roads and neighboring lots. The young successional mixed woods on the site are dominated by Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana), with Shortleaf Pine (Pinus echinata), Virginia Pine (P. virginiana), Winged Elm (Ulmus alata), Mimosa (Albizia julibrissin), Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) also present. The overgrown semi -open areas harbor a scrub /shrub /mixed herb community with small Cedar and Pine saplings and Blackberry (Rubus sp.) dominated thickets with Russian Olive (Elaeagnus umbellata) and Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense) also present. Vine species are Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), Japanese Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), Virginia Creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), Crossvine (Bignonia capreolata), and Muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia). The roadside rights of way are maintained by periodic mowing and the narrow ecotone at the edges are made up of Fescue (Festuca sp), Broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), Dog fennel (Eupatorium spp.), Goldenrod (Solidago spp.), Blackberry, Johnson Grass (Sorghum halepense) and Multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora). Threatened & Endangered /Protected Species Results • All potential habitat for Schweinitz's Sunflower, Michaux's Sumac and Smooth Coneflower was examined and none of these species were found. • No habitat exists on the site for Bald Eagles, and there were no sightings nor were any nesting sites observed. • Previous surveys have determined that Carolina Heelsplitters are not present in the Steele Creek watershed. • According to information supplied by USFWS, potential late spring /summer habitat exists for the Northern Long- Eared Bat (NLEB) in the wooded section of the site and along wooded edges. Therefore, this site may be subject to section 7 and /or section 9 of the ESA which may affect tree clearing activities from May 15 through August 15. Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group 5 Leonard S. Rlndner, PLLC. Shaefer Site — Threatened /Endangered /Prolected Species Evaluation RECOMMENDATIONS: I recommend further consultation with the project planners and engineers regarding coordination with USFWS and other federal and state agencies, if needed. Respectfully submitted, V/4, Lisa R. Gaffney Biologist August 27, 2015 Wetlands and Em►Ironmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rlndner, PLLC. Shaefer Site — Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation Curriculum Vitae for: Lisa R. Gaffney Biologist / Botanist B.S. Biology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Ms. Gaffney is a classically trained Botanist and has conducted field work and investigative studies covering thousands of cumulative acres in both North and South Carolina since 1996, including: • Cabarrus County NC Natural Heritage Inventory 1997 -1998. Organized, directed, and worked in field survey of natural areas in Cabarrus County for the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, collecting field data and writing reports. • Lincoln County NC Natural Heritage Inventory 2000 -2001. Organized, directed, and worked in field survey of natural areas in Lincoln County for the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, collecting field data and writing reports. • Threatened and Endangered Species Surveys and Natural Communities Evaluation for over 20,000 acres in North and South Carolina, 1996 - present. • Located and identified at least six previously unreported populations of Federally Endangered Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii). • Located and identified four previously unreported populations of Threatened Dwarf Heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora). • Located a previously unknown population of Federally Endangered Schweinitz's Sunflower at Redlair Farm in Gaston County, NC. This discovery led (in part) to the purchase of the site by the State of North Carolina Plant Conservation Program, now called Redlair Preserve. This population has become a Recovery Site for the species. • Participated in numerous Piedmont Prairie restoration projects in Mecklenburg, Union, Cabarrus and Gaston Counties, North Carolina. )YEPCI 7 Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard $. Rindner, PLLC. Shaeki -,Sire Threatened /En(Iungci- ed/Prolecled Sj)ecies Ewdutllic�n Figure 2: VICINTIY MAP //01'� v _L J o S61. Walfand Ln µit dry` f60J V Cades Cove Rd C 61ow -6va IV L% e yyyy W` h Ed Broom Rd VF 4 o� 0 J �PSri �9ho�+e Brio' c� V bing any A� L c q� an„ CO. Ra �estlaKe � V .P� t `K �.yt6 MKro�of GorporH r.,n a 2016 HERc O u a c a v V a t a, O` �a �Pr rreke Di N I ® 2-315 Microsoh Corooraiior, C 2015 HERE SCHAEFER - WESTIAKE DR Mecklenburg Co., NC VICINITY MAP— WATERSOFTHE U.S, Bf S TIN G CONDITIONS STUDY SUS ECT TO USACEftW M VRIFIC47ION Drawn By: jReftviewed LRG DA8/1 YYEPG R Wetlands and Ernrlronmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rlndner, PLLC. e.ier Site — Threatened /Endangered/Protected Species Evaluation ure 3: USGS MAP ■ J' SITE Sju A-i LOCATION Lat: 35.1417 eN SCALE -a— Long: -80.9737 9W 1:24,000 HUC: 03050103 ACRES USGS QUAD LOWER CATAWBA 18-0 Charlotte West NC SCHAFFER - WESTLAKE DR Mecklenburg Co., NC USGS MAP - WATERS OF THE U.S. EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY SUBJECT TO USACEINCDENR VERIFICATION WEPG Wetlands and E nmental PlamIng Group -e W DATE 9 Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC. 4 Err Drawn By: I Reviewed By: RG LSR DATE 9 Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC. Shueki- Site — Tltreutened/Enel(iiigei ed /Protected Species Ewdimliol7 Figure 4: USDA SOIL MAP /,I EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VERIFICATION Reviewed By: E: /15 YYEEG 10 Wetlands and ErMronmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC. Shaefer Site — Threatened /Endangered/Protected Species Evaluation Figure 5: USDA SOIL MAP LEGEND I Map Unit Legend Map Unlit Symbol IrA Ir8 Me0 Totals for Area of Interest MockNnburp County, North Carollti (NC119) Map Unit Name Acne In AOI Iredell fine sandy loam. 0 to 1 percent slopes Iredell fine sandy loam. 1 to 8 percent slopes Mecklenburg fine sandy loam 2 to 8 percent slopes SCHAEFER - W ESTLAKE DR Mecklenburg Co., NC SOILS MAP 2 - WATERS OF THE U.S. EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY SUBJECT TO USACF/NCOENR V£RIHCATION Drawn By: I Reviewed By: ERG LSR DATE: 8 /1D /15 WEPG ll Wetlands and Ernlronmental Planning Group Leonard $. Rindner, PLLC. Pwtent of AOI 4.2 26.7% 11 4 71.9% 0.2 1.4% 15.8 100.0% SOILS MAP 2 - WATERS OF THE U.S. EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY SUBJECT TO USACF/NCOENR V£RIHCATION Drawn By: I Reviewed By: ERG LSR DATE: 8 /1D /15 WEPG ll Wetlands and Ernlronmental Planning Group Leonard $. Rindner, PLLC. Shaepr Silo - Tl lreuleiiecl/Endangered/Prolecled Species Evaluulion Figure 6: AERIAL MAP WEPG Wetlands and Em+lronmental Planning Group SCHAEFER - WESTLAKE DR Mecklenburg Co., NC AERIAL MAP — WATERS OF THE U.S. EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VERIFICAAON Drawn Hy: I Rev ewer b, lRG AR DATE: 6 /10 /1S 12 Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.