20231596 Ver 1_Add Info - Bank_20240104

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Report suspicious emails with the Report Message button located on your Outlook menu bar on the Home
tab.

Hi All,

I wanted to provide the updated information about the proposed crossing that I mentioned in my email on Tuesday. Please see the attached info from the contractor. In summary, the new
impact to the stream would be a permanent impact, totaling 21 lf of stream (previously applied for 38 lf of temporary stream impact). The permanent impacts are due to the instability
of the existing bridge and the fact that the gabions would be left in as permanent support. However, the buffer impact would be eliminated (previously applied for 3,120 sqft of BZ1
and 2,017 sqft of BZ2), as the approach would be within the existing approach and would require no tree clearing (see note below that 1-2 trees may be taken down to the stump).

Below is from the contractor:

“Drawings are on pages 3-5 of the attached document. Sheet 4 prescribes the gabion install for abutment protection. There will be 7 each 3’ X 1’ X 6’ gabions on each side of the bridge.
They will be roughly 1.5’ into the stream at observed regular creek stage. Impact of the gabions themselves per side is 7 each times 3’ long time 6’ wide or 126 SF. Round up to 150
SF to 200 SF and include both sides and you are looking at impacts of 300 to 400 SF. We would recommend that these be permanent as does your on call structural engineer I believe.

Drawing 5 shows temporary earth pressure shoring for the abutments. All of that work should be on the bank of the stream. If that is located in the buffer, those impacts would be approximately
200 SF on each side of the bridge for a total of 400 SF.

Only other impact would be construction of the approach to the bridge on either side. Width of the road would be approximately 15’. By my calculations, we should be well below the
2,500 SF for temporary roads.

We will be doing some tree trimming to facilitate installation, but no wholesale tree clearing. May involve taking a tree or two down to the stump.”

Please let us know if you have any further questions or would like to discuss any of this.

Thank you,

Nancy

From: Nancy Oberle
Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2024 4:15 PM
To: Jim Mason <[e-mail]>; Hopper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Archer, C Alexi CIV USARMY CESAS (USA) <Cristin.A.Archer@usac
e.army.mil>
Cc: Thomas, Zachary T <[e-mail]>; Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Hammond, Swade D CIV USARMY CESAS (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: SAW-2023-01253 (Town of Cary Dredging Project / Cary NC / Wake County)

Hi Alexi & Chris,

Please below responses (in green) to the comments that Alexi provided. The Town and the designer have reworked their plan to reduce the size of the wetland impact from 0.26 acre to 0.05
acre. See attached updated plan sheets showing the adjusted staging area. As you’ll see on the updated plan sheets, they are also working on avoiding the temporary stream impacts by
utilizing the existing pedestrian bridge. This would require only minor temporary stream impacts and would eliminate the need for riparian buffer impacts.

Please let us know if any further clarification is needed. As Jim mentioned, we would be happy to have a call/Teams meeting to discuss any of this with folks.

Thank you and Happy New Year!

Nancy

1. The disposal site, a lagoon south of the South Cary Wastewater Treatment Plant, is .85 acre in size. Four acres of sediment (12,400 cubic yards) would be placed
there. The application further states that material would not be placed within 1-foot of the crest of the lagoon’s surrounding dike. Please verify that the lagoon will be capable of
receiving all dredged material. Are secondary disposal locations also being considered?

Based on a conservative estimate of the capacity within the lagoon, leaving one foot of freeboard, there is sufficient capacity to receive all of the material we are likely to be able
to dredge within the time constraints of this project.

2. There appear to be significant waters surrounding the lagoon. Have delineations been conducted in these areas? What measures are proposed to ensure no impact to
adjacent waters results?

All work will be conducted within the footprint of the former lagoon and from high ground areas around the lagoon. Access is via an existing gravel roadway. The lagoon area and access
road are all elevated a minimum of five feet above all forested and wetland areas, and are part of the operational footprint of the wastewater treatment facility that has been on the
site and operating since the early 1990s.

3. How will material be moved from the spillway dredge area to the temporary storage area?

The material will dredged using hydraulic methods and pumped into the mechanical dewatering facility. Once dewatered, the material will be trucked to the disposal area.

4. The application states that alternative lands to the south are residential but Wake County iMaps documents a large upland forest area is shown owned by GI ETS Regency
Woods. Please detail why these uplands are not usable in lieu of clearing forested wetland for dredge storage.

The property discussed in the comment is not owned or controlled by the Town of Cary. The project as proposed is being conducted entirely on land owned by the Town. In addition, this
property has extremely steep topography (see map) and would require extensive grading to be usable as a staging area. Also, trucks would not be able to negotiate the 90-degree turn
that would be required to access the section of greenway that leads out of the site. In addition, this would necessitate addressing another pedestrian greenway bridge (installing another
temporary bridge that would allow truck traffic).

5. The application states that live-staking with saplings would occur if required in the future. Please explain how this requirement would be triggered, when in the
future the decision would be made, and why replacing woody vegetation once complete is not currently proposed.

The cleared areas will be seeded and strawed to stabilize them after work is complete. The cleared wetland area will be seeded with wetland seed mix. Cary will replant the site with
a mix of hardwood trees in winter of 2024-2025 (dormant season).

6. The avoidance and minimization discussion doesn’t discuss wetland impacts for dredge spoil. Please explain why clearing a forested wetland for dredge spoil is required,
when the town owns both the Koka Booth property (uplands), and the existing greenway trail (which presumably could be temporarily detoured/closed).

Any impacts due to stockpiling of dredge spoil will be temporary. The revised plan shows the proposed temporary stockpile area has been reduced in size, as has the wetland impacted.

From: Jim Mason <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2023 11:44 AM
To: Hopper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >; Nancy Oberle <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >; Archer, C Alexi CIV USARMY CESAS (USA) <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Cc: Thomas, Zachary T <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >; Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>; Hammond, Swade D CIV USARMY CESAS (USA) <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Subject: Re: SAW-2023-01253 (Town of Cary Dredging Project / Cary NC / Wake County)

Chris – thank you for the quick response. We will pass along the information regarding permits being needed prior to starting to the town. We are also working on Alexi‘s request for
additional information. We hope to have that to you after the holiday week and are happy to have a meeting, either in person or via Teams, to discuss the project further, if needed.

Thanks and have a great holiday week, Jim

James Mason

Three Oaks Engineering, Inc.

[phone]

________________________________

From: Hopper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2023 3:06:46 PM
To: Nancy Oberle <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >; Archer, C Alexi CIV USARMY CESAS (USA) <[e-mail] <mailto:Cristin.A.Arc
[e-mail]> >
Cc: Thomas, Zachary T <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >; Jim Mason <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >;
Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >; Hammond, Swade D CIV USARMY CESAS (USA) <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >
Subject: RE: SAW-2023-01253 (Town of Cary Dredging Project / Cary NC / Wake County)

Thank you for the email, Nancy:

The Corps’ position on this project is that it does not yet qualify for use of the (any) requested permit. Avoidance and minimization have not been adequately addressed. We regret the
situation your client finds themselves in, but our process must be completed in advance of any work in waters. Please ensure they are aware that an after-the-fact permit for work on
this project as proposed would be a heavy lift, and mitigation at a minimum of 2:1 for all impacts associated with the work, and a detailed restoration plan for disturbed resources,
would be considered. As proposed, the project would set a concerning precedent in our area of responsibility.

Please also convey our commitment to working with them as fairly and expeditiously as possible, within the limits of our program. We hope they do not choose to proceed knowing that proper
authorizations have not been secured.

Apologies for jumping in, Alexi, but this situation is unique in the TREC’s experience.

Christopher. D. Hopper

TREC Team Lead / Wilmington District Liaison

US Army Corps of Engineers Savannah District

3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105

Wake Forest, NC 27587

[phone]

We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey can be accessed by copying and pasting the following link into your web browser:
https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/. Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.

From: Nancy Oberle <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2023 12:52 PM
To: Archer, C Alexi CIV USARMY CESAS (USA) <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Cc: Hopper, Christopher D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >; Thomas, Zachary T <[e-mail] <mailto:zachary.thom
[e-mail]> >; Jim Mason <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] FW: SAW-2023-01253 (Town of Cary Dredging Project / Cary NC / Wake County)

Hi Alexi,

We have received your request for additional information for the subject project. We are coordinating with the Town of Cary to answer/address all of your questions/comments.

In the meantime, I wanted to make you aware of the information below. I had sent this email thinking Rachel Capito would be the Corps rep reviewing the permit application. We wanted
to get your feedback on the scheduling issue. Obviously, we will need to address all of the comments you sent previously before you would provide any sort of approval. Apologies for
not getting this information to you sooner.

Please let us know how you would like us to proceed, and we will go from there.

Thanks so much and Happy Holidays!

Nancy

From: Nancy Oberle
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 3:50 PM
To: Capito, Rachel A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Cc: Jim Mason <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Subject: SAW-2023-01253 (Town of Cary Dredging Project / Cary NC / Wake County)

Ms. Capito,

As you may be aware, we have recently submitted an ePCN for the subject project. The client has informed us that, due to the finances of the project, the project will be let for bid
in the near future. This means that construction work may need to begin before you have had time to issue the permit. We are wondering if we could get your general approval for the
impacts as they are presented. Alternatively, we could ask for the permit to be issued as an after-the-fact.

Please let us know how you would like us to proceed given this new information.

Thank you,

Nancy

Nancy Scott Oberle

Three Oaks Engineering

324 Blackwell Street, Suite 1200

Durham, NC 27701

919-732-1300 - office

919-900-6535 - direct

[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>

www.threeoaksengineering.com <http://www.threeoaksengineering.com>

퀸ʯṶᎊ글嶂⡒⍽䮊⡝茮痢⸨␋뀱쑧ظ싒양ᘸ쉒ឍ㣣糈躐!詼霘㒂쥰屢ᛡ熊젙笒豝䏋뢾ㅞ袮詛ᕷ䫣璃褹좱稣㝊뢡҂ढ़ꗁꌯસꞢ䏴✔専突訍䦫꯰ሚ釴孈ᰙ綠撉䧪ᣰ⠦ࣿ✔뢣舁䣋⳨℣䅟꺂혠᝿ᛉ㪦ʒ瑙✞ᎅ⟇獹屸輎柆�鈔剧⤒ᖔ삟⅏㊅顓㒼茦옒䤰瑡謞ߋⓔ⼚즜ŋ䠍ᐎᛘឭ譕奘␩褚ꏏ頱㓉≞ᎉ〧稥剱ࢹ캙�昬┊쾁軧놶佉ꝏ༤凰땀弍�섄ﭐ咔㜮얉遤㣢㹬ᒅ䧉┥ӓ풤☔ࣨ蹴䦐๼캉퉣䳸ቫ閃䷂ঢ䦬㘴쒃뇥ⵀ뀝섰隝礲ⳉἾ讈ꀕ
⚊㙌ଢꑔ㢐Ƽฤ쇩쿺㣲和�蒚௘떴�琌拀튓堓Ӵ촉䇒ⲧ㴶锩谁꠻蜽⒝餠ⲳ챈壤쮠㬐�ᘌ鸻揄ⱹ㈺䎑”ߍ륥ᚢ朰庁쳸摤秖퀬茫캓ᣐ察⚏ᔲ螓蜌먃휂㹔锷扏鄰≡़ⓌԖ쐮蠖釙ĉ脂ች녘ꀬԳ舊း䨏梆ቐ蛄ꀄଔ〉ႊ験쨅쇏ꡧా菢ᬻ聢༫熪렍쎩석臭䅶ဤ惒ઈꈹ⛿苁胨Ώ肥ᱏ䭨벂楑͊ᘔ�Ԑ磔車ਞɐ䮨䭁灌ɧ㓮数츀瀰ޏ颭㚠锌ˏ�⡸䠕둁䜋ꕛ箈䄠ꀎభ᮴⽪嫙⩒ڙ簾䭔ꀆꌦጲഁङ鍒㜎磆鲴瀎쇓᤽ᆔ뇛ᇐ큑洁搴 ԝ出䔞�
퐂嚨⁜ぁｬ栩峟ݠ樖ሳ⎠皣䒎⍵⎡耒⩻彪裑⍄框吜ṻ䃠警変㊃ꋣᙶᒠ侑넍ꢧ崭蔬⸩僓峙噴冐퇲ꐺⱕ잪䖀킓ℑڭዴ䢵굁﯉┓灮혌㔿尻체洀ꃨ赬䯚忤红ޭ炙ѱ퐬튏㭑쇑硵ꖛ䞋炊쇓剨ｑౡ筫䶤訒Ι୾䝰ⴼ汖认�䡶̺ᒕ栏퐼蘭쳨ߑ⍰쿽륺㈀턒罨欃鄝ᨯ̫퉐金큳빷קּꯎ炼埄꣑硄먪劖雑뚈댃‹䉌ﭟ⢨넊㏅␳恽낅囄ﱆ턇ᘷ뒵湨ꊇന㐃㊪访첲ᨨ磺㸪㼀긎耮ڛ聆ۘ뺉肞ރ悴궣컀ﴁ㛻⨇蚀᯿还⎚侻ቆ帻ꮌ袤杰겒챹歄䓒鼚
揽错䆃腥�瀾ፗ행Ǜ䢶嫉糥쑐捈蕋ꭺ꤁謀僁懥⥙閂ฒ䶫悀钚閜ؔᆏ愺ヒи隶텮틏�顐간겉쑑蠺읍 䨛쌈ফ昛呺亐吗笟｜꧱쳦饗䊥ح쐬섷层⥅謎拁皉앀꽽尞䝖䍮�⬇樎↋봀凒焵䑒铬⨰ḑᒁ衤ᅲ钴逄隸㘜Օ䉖튈♐餣曃嵡⊄呇瘟䚫萵逍ᱺ歑纨⬲䦙鋓꒹潠塏卟㬈盀❔鶪쎭倴艴ޝ炋䖿䔳Ṙ鞩✃蜅쵒占兑ﬢ熂㹡鼤ꂰ廑㻎擞�黓䓬략骧웂ᆢ໩ꈻ터૮或⒌谭䀡ℸ᥆琂갹茐媁힦飬䷙飏數ᜂ孜콹ལ綘㦫࿵ﱆ醙靫﫼竒혏薿綋⹟노栩睅
䎎ᾳ鯜횧㞚觥率⨉鮎⽆ꙟ⦙棈䦀뉪牏�䍾瑞溪㓎醹⛳蝗꾧롐뛥磌ઐ쥳퇨괇摣�皮︿ⴰ䊫硭⡆捕绳嵻볓腧露閜뵏뺳俑�唻籓ᗈ❧뺽᫃못莭ᥬ꽢燼뇡靰䝳꽮걻⃳諶녔鶩놰颡瞳켴릊⨾デﭘ䖞珕㔯卫䰮뿥좶턷띗쮼謎ꭨ⌐Ⰻ聂胵砚崵幧듛䝕猼碏�昲遮髍᤹⇵挽ᚼ醬暥ｬ曱⾨깗汳婿굿啕䎓㊭᤼ち߀ǂ羰齒漜囱캝碑ꭡ䷎Ⅴ᭔绱씸灦鄚䑙ᄧ╸뀅叀撥싀ဤㆤﰘ硄倷놆渹祿䀖总ﻲ㉆☟諸怕ƹ㢑ᾙ␖栒畤駸韉茢၎輼
㑬瞖ⶸ⬫뫧ⵂ爳枋迹絮昳웮鈦卅╰厛ꋵ�峫軭⮧鮧렇돱እ嘋﵍벴鯈ԁ�㰽쩝梽믊國岊嵼払켿ᨺ弸굧屍뱮亪㢹격돦畎佦巈喳厕嶶焖纹�ᬚ㘜﻽ꏭ挣䶻Ἷ놬ᶞ穈ﱽ붆葃遲칪묬䷊歕癣輞ᢱ믴楷꯽餝笅枮曋�뭶ﾝ㳕笗㪮鷽㎛嶟뽟诇疄鲟ཇ퉕舶劅⃒疌슉Ი⍍ề庍㾺꽆㐘젬껉锚請㖭㌃͒㪂혒軼㬨唸㉔╬읚䌦㣫쎔䄁찂⬝䖎蜇鈲⩧脿揃ױ鑈鶂筠阐ᵬ惬ဗ沥梩໑詆맿藺腏獦剙ﭵ뽭陕፳〈㐟㱴⥬ㄉ�嚮覐⚗꓃⼑
꾥幎䚿毇뻕⣢푸⠭�蚜륗쫒鐟연망೧�ⲙ巶꺼伹碽됚熄俲缾廈农녹ொꖿ䝯矦썼犪㸮颥짭㒙吥ᇡ뫎噿Ⅱ廌Ꮢ漉㓼嫿쌳廉�㶈蜲鋂ᓻ⚃辌愛ᅦ뎷퇨ꥥ৬者锖ᢏ⚯�ꢼ䩳埆竌悽얙ઐ�놞퇯췤歹鸙᭳巚긗ꌮཡ⧨罖냾ڡ셳怨럲䈾䧓ﲒꁀ©⤖閇薑쑇빠ৡะⓜ켢膰줅稑磊Ჿ䕘噊ꢜ㇕Ԉ뎂䖋⦑Ⴛ廎ꖞ뒦㡇汳妸揑쭧爇歡ἣ⭭澣ﶣ�ꡓ�冫ꄶﭴ觞匩䧟⤓㡌ᑘﴒ侰瞩枩잎蟏쇄Ṫᇨ斉㡨Ⲝฑ惽硟䒜琸埾⇂า酯鿔蔌훀䔪䵹롑蹱齷�纛苻␠
匐黏겞걀炸乬懁ᗊⷕ짹螱뀣荧쑈鋠馻㭣踢乖꽝䃻錏왨旛弗抹睞⬜⎐府ퟮ᷑约剷꫅佇쾗骺髉劷謶콱婗ᢚﭱ翟鑾䉑ﱑ�귁૗룚儢랎烶쮙雤ꔐ넗ṑ씚䣋ᴞ�綶꣧툓㱖폹렯�쬖�쩏囑彴갿㋹�ᚂ꬇嬙弛쿖玚谥渚騽賁躚铑卓뭪嚥᝖딷沖듳煯많᭧殹䲸큞宸㌫ꋖ쭫ଆꥻ㏘﫮ۉ滂�辭ﭝ볕༃㯤ผ饪걭⨺�㐭弴땯�꫚鯓뺽॥댌ꤶ燃볏杔齨擞硤﯑햹ꏳﳯ姎륟魡焵ꖔ䦟듌㭝问汬총졩赋鵸�䆸쉸方둩욎喻弹泲檓뚾鲇㟎ጾ
냗潑⪉깎Ⲍﰸ臱嚪ﻺ즌⮄钞㷠ꩫ架푔꺖핋릾४픱웈ꝶ묌穴榾楣ꋗ썖⽫⟵妝�ఇ鎓㼫㓯஢譔䩯팭溣�擸즳㊃⍅ೱ逗吊⩀⣸ꎱ豥둟杈✴␰䚽濾雿沐輎ⴒ͌竉錆옔枊༣䂸䙐帞텒궍ᔃ疶ֶ쉩凞놴ລ藬᯿嬛㬱⿮￘缱ꚬ뫜擱ᵍ䙥꧎檁ᾮᜲ白䄛�箕ɲ珙徻巴䷕ᕝ埶姧饎ㄳ㔷䎗韕객㦕Ⲽ﹘苮姾ꖲ췱�叫䢵轣塥蒗緟䯝㮹ꯆ驯밁ꌏ垖㰥刐釚ﳌ䇺湋鰹㠜벺장ﲑ옺璺吕㮭蟬♯஦ឮ뼜쑛傾禣矰燝⛥龳ꄼ槖賜猞뇵绳猗凝㰲㱱캵䣪
ﯢ깓㱙ꖭﵡ贕飰킆趥㞙喞�ꙛ羓﹥锎镠ལ㸲ꄭ㟴辏㣓梾掎챥양鋣쪰ﯤ䩕嬺飆֏⋀䑳儻摓㨧괘荰럇㊉褘㉼簵븶嶨싯玄덏㽼呄ᦶ⇁㰈䯘ͮ맇莲䢩䂑뒴㪣��セ煶摶㭛ᜇ붲鱓餣ᝦⓋ툻件后綺魷㽣ぱ닡띰鎦톓궝�羵㦽㘞獘⦸㉨��㠚쑧掝ஐ瘙쌢棎ꀶ摉⦃㠰䫇ͤ羟惬℠䷼簗慘夰慣蟨跕蓦ᶥఊ뵯冻᝝Მ㣘嫶�ฑ�ᬽ�䒧ﻶ䟂퍧뉂뭥坫븇嗫푽柠뚦䎛麾꧊셲쯧㪦궾�뚥苻缧ㄉ쬭ፚ迨뾫릪㐪繝疛췘林髌⧮睵☜점�蝺紦派싮
ԙᆫ鰎볛賿趃嵻揄㗓夏ਮ瑈첝ﻛ욌⫶젬ᑯ�亽덷⎺䷕橿覌��͘碌彫긮㬽죩묭슺羅䪥꿃鼙텈䶸佲࣢➘봎ﹷ⠨牢蒴旍䵮ⰵ⊈够헭넓㊈肳쎐욇苍玛㈻⎛뙤靳⇝֚∐缙쎊篍ᬰ紪䷌䢬箽坠ϸ㣞冡㽊阈읳쾮효⪓爏댯瓐맔뻽챎﬑ヂ贿�爷ῳΰ⹘孒晽�ꬳꚇꬫﶔ䝶봨罾זּ䝑븱녅폪鿱፻烠櫦ꏶᗄᕣ쨗杁쿦㮷믯㭏掍슔ഺᐰ引氖匥흶鷹�ℝ砯鞝啬呌∂뫩ⷿ뱖졭﯃៓㶬䗾뫓냢䱫䵁ﶂ堗됵쵲樻怯⡘ঝ
ऋαχ䊥쏑�ꦏ笠뿩퐥싚⢰媶쳼洦⬨셐ɑƤᜇ䇑ᇂ刭ꑡῸ嫏ᘁ߉遘쀏ꮚﻨ叄ꗑ뷬�吭됉썔廍阺쾉֧㻯趬㿷ꂲ䅉껿픩컝䬧ꪤ뭎앜冨⺽⫧᠊馯鉩륔￉㌉�萷죕㝙�旜⾵뙓﫲좺駖蓚燧콩䍬ꥇ㳚邭︉皣ꇜᯨᓍ橜䉅�黤凑ᩥ糯�晷懬ᰳ瘲튔즕잗ﺮ뒞헢섨罶Ꞌ잊襊쟩룖됿Ꚛၢ渘▾瞓畟⇴᧿㨷봻⹗㦼暧蹎췎픱퇹狏ⴧ绒晛邏킨법滏쭪ㆡ浟휯�殫圪켹�斘ᯝ블탒듁藉壍瘐㟤뷥责鴗睽霄ﲳ䱃엷원㗼ᮏ䷲둣࿌㎞眳ⴶ饶�嗪瓻쮍앷ꊽ찙恺뿮昱蝩
썥ㆀ춡∇䰼�㊗�㕜졾嚍꽍ࣽ꠽菟옕㻜庮ꃛ敳쁊靓웧蝚췇秵ꉴ鞉齹퓷붤럑ꖤꓫ쑮藭忋洞⬕忚�樂滹展觇鴹㫗鸃寺᎔矍쾔쾋鉺鬗匑덣竨濄赑濦錺첛갋옋䴺��ⶉ뙗�ퟰ恾챿䴠⚵콆뭜챾묤띅險�ᓛ滴啝澽剩�毽켇鵓ἠἾ䣦鐴蜀䙍ܣꠛ見偲鐘씊�柷㾭퐝팤輜ᨼⵋ껴⍓㴄典㯾鋵깱㰽鑍郦ꨧ䪓䬃爃枥恀苝୕♠膊拭浬擑䌷�슅烁䒐맺쾣죟쏧鯙⋬笸鰍犽䣐ᰔ⛘Ể�ㅡ瘚铿ᥛ稜᠊⬙욙퀓좹硤ꃬⰀ꽬䭯菒ꈦ䞐㇯턈☫⠁ꂥ풏⽅쐪
į穈旃㦷诛俯栖⹓ᯇ遭㝟Ǣ啽힉禺ɭ슅찓記飵䶏䮼௉ế磳휦�縸훗혞穭醣梢ꋦ秂糋ꞃ僜㕘䶷䀻잷母꫅褯윏午㘬焼�庀᫺躗賧㏜贲衻盳⸗睿ᑶퟖ擲쪞淑ࢻᬊጺ┾홐媖塺並Ꟶ젛�諓㷗磮轁햯쾽ឮᰛ�ﮦ圞疚뱞ꏛ奔幢᱔Ｎ♖髷鍁嚭睇喇כֿ巽令鷉딼�髣랛韕界鶶ꙭꂽ鷺쟙홻䦣좚ӜꜶჼ榿䄬ݪ틆豼菐᠘缧㚼셁崂搜鼼듲揇餭魛䎢獣軨㥅럭㹺햾嬨ﳠꋶ꾋ྞ䮧뛿豤메◔͔掵�ꜻ�缽㉗絿榏ꫳ編푙ᮺ뗐�좆ꊞ닭縁┪ٙ℗隋෪㷛
퉼᷵땎�㦲팳鏨嫟誃姆鮽㘾Ḧ⠊磪骙ﶡ藪襓⭀�媵蓣⟔龕⼾⥻讀俄템點䲚楾硣ꓐ곆ꌈ貲똑馆鹝핲ﴞ켻譭儾璶쑃㼠杞ꐶ靍ﱋ�ꉼ㤡홹킙ꈔ晢称Ⴊ՟끻ఘ붜㿶뢝㾆ฒ⮽촩䙮辂觘煥Ք៉䀱ꆋ㲒ॕ겖蝕融₩涴季坬뮚醶덻ⶕ�ᒔ՛ೀ⚉퐊硰ꥲ陥냹寯Ｇ극�Ⲩ뾓�ޓ庿湃ெ週쥫貕꜉禍椄띜誌㗆췻貤綿쵸ﶼᶄ윧찛ꃍ锷뫺蟄忐둆溫罊䎁੝㪶㥔蝭婍寎꿚㧫嫆떑殚葰�醳꟩铒磍㺅㩡晋퉪댯�好ᚣ鸏殦疬ト囆রﻪ㪸擴旔
�﩮䖭궾쿣귍틙澮㵶矋톭▔铋⪢ᐯ롸蹅睼컠晦똗苂洿륜諷��蔂�࿄釹ᯆ蟇滜趰⪿�绷縶鯧�凼ﶆ籌쇖띦Ⱋ笘㳏⸱ꣶ㼕먲行ܵᏛꆓ鈹ઢ㒀甂ᗍ뇿뎇뿃鍸짰塨퉋庇戠㖃ꨄ免첒氙⺨㰰俭줞췯齰嫬�ꐞ뷡킷鼲ḟ↣늾농羭뮢毦锷攕졷푱숷錋質ޅគ湇껡촿⮠ꔧꮔࣁﰖ뻺䫩보終ꗓ㟱㎏㿧秴㫷㓊窧鸧代覕ꔽ炎ゝ櫐榩윧䆲泭悫倫뵳㭧宯ᯢ笠Ღʼ⽍ﭨ�囀ᖎﵯ纭䶁ꏞ鿹�憾欔依햘릖⺲맣�殛Ᏻ�赴퐺⣿콯喸䈋ꎋ揫౻
춶䠌ꄶᓖ蹴퐭㮺藍㲭鯛曝뒚値僦阔䶽皸诰흣�跜╞㧮ꟺ톧�ᰓ濟ꛣ⎊䄧翐愁ඎ෬攊摮瑳敲浡਍湥潤橢਍㌵‷‰扯൪㰊⼼祔数⼠扏卪浴⼠⁎㈱⼷楆獲⁴ㄱ㘹䰯湥瑧⁨㐵㐴䘯汩整⁲䘯慬整敄潣敤㸾瑳敲浡਍鱸峝濻䣛ﺒ�逘끣쁘Ⓩ䤷蠦줽᧞臂嬢⺎撲쫈牌ﵿ핽꡼䬥垶遱웅�ﬤ畕啵∿첹♘쪹울霍뮤듉롴쳛茚쮻Ꮌ﮸玌㏅堩ꗆ䣲ᑰ੔鄉ꭱ噑⪠邯顙灌祆♜䖄뉂⡌徭좤傔낙씎㈥⵻ꂑ兦咇䬠䩸⺠⡥쮁䦔凫ᚡ抙漌剐ေ딥艂ê訩摩ꗄ䖘浑�詥쩳釬甀
ヒꠤ썖ꂑಶ닄쵁ↂ�섪㌩ᙪ„ᤀᶥ䆽躅⑙ꅐ䑧⨝໴Ɐ㓏矃䕩릦⥄鄫븠ፀ旉ၚ쀗⭈Ⲵ쬝ڴሶ栔䨍ȹヌᵪ᮵乢鼺䌙熭习饺⣙꼦䬳ꑿ䄧쀪퐋玬ሄ᳏쭇⭀䩳䉺猫዆♚陳Ř칋遇▹瑬ᗦа퀤踈䈷鱧蠑툊䳥ꀩ▝‌⁄谍튔㪤䍨穩է蕰뢌呠Ȃ苠ڣ밅ꊑ²ஜꐉ耔싦穸郧⑲倊ﲃ攒⠁蒗슦괅桤櫍䅊ᑳ㐐뎽奈➒࿀儂⧐ꐅᤁᐩꚠ줔墩倳纇䨨ᚡ裥尣ňﱐ쩁漓몞栃詅ᑺ﨧⠼ː⪵ň䖝੒땥铳奂臭蚎熒ੴ㵴蛈ꄛ畉镀鬁ꅈꌾ㐅捰赉⠠鱮አ劖㾤黠༛㒎Ẻꁒ䍜䁼봔䍂䡢
䪁褐圔莤劒䶠ᖓʰ퇲㎐놷ꑒ紴ᭅᴖ⤇⥇㕃즫堢呍䦑䚰䒠঴ꇆꂄ倶刍蛔呵�䔡㡭䂢᭐㢞䚇읱쩣੓罯받シ뾳﷿錪摗﵅歝찳ᗼͺࡼ魠ሌ瞐鄙昚ᤂ㼷⌰⍫澡ᔷ旓ᣁ耙龀᳸柫顬䪑壛ʋㄽ㸻ﬡ瘐櫵沽ൊ緑㨓䬘奩ꦥ℡矢㮺뜰㭉ᰱ瞿郥涶บ쟫뵉铼싁솱斫鴹䝔졩⡵짫᫬൵擹젚뫴ﺈ糠幚旟縪㸺羞쪽Ͳ종ꐥ镊Á㌰鰜랔쌯﫤鋓ᾚ蚜⪻雌⹙ᢸ㔜瑩墛�⛲踌�⿱譇㥉獽령盼⩇颸⻜诧엁�|ｹ䊅啅᫈✑ἢ饆뉵摊句ꮈ桎낝ᙈ첊ͷ椔鑹
蛋₼筀彵呠봺“䴨꩗瑹摷�녯݆즚➊ꄅ곇넡퇓焵曁训㜫句᥹ગ썌ಒ둤豠哱ᡠ鼦뀨䚓怒糱㝚㬩朲杍⥋捉ᑨ蘀�朊鈥वㄌ巪≵菀御ᢪᅶᆿ豻≺�ᴀ䕍殺蘽ﰸ㕒頒鷐ҽⶆ�ዶھκ侸ﴃĴ觽୰힣ᛠ䯴䜠�魴囝딮䥪⃷��㤅ꮨ磔ס�륢軚�脢嫥৫￈麴舀뀄䴟✗찟뭻䲟嫎ﲙ鵓䨠Ⰵ྽粊芧᱆ਫ鴙弌鞇鮉ธ༮現᝾㽮꽥쬧㓥ꈜ矝羯㢽켿讖栯먊둥춌䈮ಸ靟ᄍ덇糙㠹⾞냪쪸㵈烙穰ぴ፸퍦ﹹ尾饿஖艘独辌蟗㞃꜇슿蔫좣㗈틳㟿｣征勤ጮ뗎烃멏甠꩐ᩰ
쁕턓펆釧�餦鴰䭕鰩䊲䯿⩐Ǯ裪圼븈鐂穫駼ꩤ耝鑶Ꟃ肎糾쵊ꔦ䍰∋ᖐ숢꠪妇喙璙䫵싳ꈒᑞ抆稟秺䪄꽶ℯ㎶蔅뺲ꁀ䞈♴⻀ꆽ鿧캽매ဪ户⧜ꈴу藧ꏆ㏸봩鿗䨺岹钧泽⟵ꈮ艑쨔뉸麎♾鏺턖�馢衱孄佅鄿鹌꛴௣뜼䧾ҫᝎ紌惟ퟤ켔⤲砊隯䊉븈Ꮕ䫘৺ོ⫸ݷ枒ꆧᚂ㸝컀씺択顥᧾鎖⒪놿㋣⊲걗宼ꯌ낋᪼㮼Ἵ᯾㦽侙诧�લ烴낇睎ᄓ륫萇・紺磈쥹蓣鍡醱祵鸲틿࿨뎃㕙켧繾칓៺鏧�ᐓ詌쩞킗⣘�᳍⺼泛稠矈㖣흴阾
�跰铣꽪뵉辏ᮜ흑鿑ꯗ襏澏럣翾쓓乳觓紖㎁혭❦䬤籼穩弟ම缟恍ﶻ깻䱔䒽녟肫�嫈朔⺜宾㾄ꄳ�ಣೣ籲鲺瞠�뭽ﶹ鼴쭽냫✬믓뛢἞�க刢ꎴ琝௴꘽塍嚾䢩봫ᓸ⬮畧懶︒ꐫ䊤揾Ъㅦ桪鴿큏驭婺錦⫢츭ꆞ睸岡횘坷칱㊝꧅㛶뮡븒硍◞첺쮾믬뻌䳍䉭襶댶ݪ㢁�䐤䛷潴癆呯䛷潵৚憇ꝯ�曄轣⟢熊茻溴窒뼋䔲✟ꎳ�群跮️嗰标䒰莋㿋⸎㽿郄ឆ䣹؜＆丰슨၉퓤슨懂谴㏓檍陔늆܏暿糙鶜讔蝯뭽懗䱭擞纙ꬖ韱耱㇋珖㎛賝초抿櫨鑦
奈㟛옇꼑幥孪棂鄸ㇻ祷씨⥘舵．푩ᙖൺ㖿�䵀�ɍ栐ꑠ䖠Ҏ⨴胚텶訚痬㧹Ꝥ傋ꍟ´鼋氓෬栃ᖥ场熣刾낈꾃Ẅ쎋똵ᚏꟕዉ暌䘘៿쟷이苪먧끃۰ⶆ㕕鲨☭韛￩壽䰠萂�ଞ蛊耑輘틳⫔ᬟ왡괣熄⏵䠝砨蚰蜸乩뮌隂㔺Ԣ漼艅偷碼링㽳ܖ⪗঄嚒턒깡᪤廧熹�᪲ᵙ嘪痫옜翴揘聚䎠媦Ⰰꍤ崅蛹鏟従ᾳ淊쌿괔ᕇ拀ຬ�啖볮ݜ쭰过嵈달䈂熮晎婢쉞뛹悺ꨒ덏ᑲ�詋㦁蹣잯㼌ᨂ䂑鶣꒬휙춥ᡕ瑙놈秉ꇥ蠢⮃럭숨亮⯐䊂鱸航⯜꽂㷸朌頳Ⴤ㼖⻚
퓺種쟧՚辙幫ꫥ餜璼堣₇䉆읺錵롛ꗟ㴌勷㘖廥稙맮ᴗ쟷蓰狪솖봧鼍Ɀ꧟ᰙ嬋䮏뎑圮ㆣ˺雜嗜㱶ᤚꁫ荼᮲뒄瓥្긢돓ᇂ䛫ਃ羚걌唧�ᾋ烋壍륃ᆕ론畖戾캢玅䪣傻半惭謸똮谵넾斩蠡꽭䘊㖻ꆌ㗧뮶᪊迦彆㞖ߤﾣ熓처�섘�짗鋝䧖ⱞ顂嗽ﭾ皡녒仔쪺劙꼢崫ꠍ黆ꐔ駊혗幙쪹ෘ溔镃㑝좄됗䑝싨໐⸢ꬊ捨ꎊ裧嫐퀥�왁埲ﯙⴰꆗ퇾儖풱눢镐ꯁ뜪൵섗锛粏祰੕ᨳ덈䗔帙儓ꡖ掳쟸Нꂢፍ텂⫦鼃︑悾࿜ዉ얄笲✽찬�ꛌ퀆ׁ斂ꐕ⮝⬁ሸ撲맊
䬠爵ያ蔿ไ曁ｳ쁰酳럠䔉ꩬ邝ﮌ뚔㽇줝꺑ꙶ꭭ᔵ㍒ᙊ渪삯歐晭ꆴ䀣憵ᝦ㷕ඤ㐽즩㕰࢜霩越Ⳡ�싧뱢ꘌ攒㫙㬍廔됔䥧˫憃栦荹ଶ苹雋蓶ෘḶ�혩뻓尋ၰ蛆窛犤ⳃ纼㼁ꑷ쾃舽卩朱㒴蝳Ὦౝ⯾ꇒ極㳄ᚖ▬닺梤肽䥛墳古㺨읧꿳殺쐾콢횠贘諵㟳ᆿ⟶㳽個㽅쇃퇉芁䡬軃뎗얆屓莠ᤶꀶ㻾팞썆矽纙㵗턪鐸㘈灇悗̷ꠄꚇ擁馬꺢