20240191 Ver 1_PCN Report for DEQ_20240129

►'_'` Dewberry-
..,,
North CarolinaDepartment of Environmental Quality
r Regional
! W. Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC ! .+
RE: Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) request
Burnt Poplar Road; Guilford County, North Carolina
To Whom It May Concern:
Dewberry Engineers Inc. 434.797.4497
551 Piney Forest Road 434.797.4341 fax
Danville, VA 24540-3353 www.dewberry.com
Dewberry submits the enclosed Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) for the Samet Burnt Poplar
Road project. Samet Corporation is proposing to construct an access road from Burnt Poplar Road
onto a currently wooded 5.25-acre lot. The lot is slated to be cleared and a pad created to be utilized as an
outdoor storage area.
The project will result in 30 linear feet (LF) of temporary stream impacts and 71.53 LF of permanent
stream impacts. Based on the average width of the streams, the permanent impacts will not cause the
loss of greater than 1/2 -acre of non -tidal aters of the U.S. (WOUS). The proposed project appears to
meet the terms and conditions of Nationwide Permit (NWP) — 39 (Commercial and Institutional
Developments). A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) request is enclosed. The applicant
respectfully requests verification from the Corps that the activities are authorized under the NWP
program.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Dylan Irby at
434-548-0479 or [e-mail].
Regards,
Dylan T. Irby
Environmental Scientist
Z"�
Troy A. Shelton, PWS, PWD, VSWD
Environmental Department Manager
Senior Environmental Scientist
Enclosures:
1. Impact Map
2. Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) Flood Insurance Map
3. Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) Report
4. T&E Species Letter
5. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Map
6. Antecedent Precipitation Tool (APT) Report
7. Preliminary Jurisdictional Request (PJD)
P:\50166067\Envir\PCN\2024.1.23 Samet PCN Coverletter for DEQ.docx
I'"age 1 self 1

Attachment 1
Impact Map

\\
\
\
22}z
?7P
�i~i\e
o°5
°2°?§<>
°mE©©>=
>z«e-
o
j(
}/LL
Lu
.. .®
\+
/\\
\\ .
\©/
y.
^~
ee
/ \
^
>\ e«
\�,
�
_
\/�
\/�
>
\\\\\\\\
> y y
Lu
yr
„
` \\
� y\
>�
\».�
%
�
xv
\LU
\ \z
�
|
|

LD
w
o
o
oo
Q
Lo
O
�
rn N
O
O
p 0')CO
O
a
0')
O�
00
FS 00
O
z
O
>
a
Q
z
w
�
06'868
o
N
co
6'868
w
J
LL
6b'906
8'L06
nG�
L.L
O�
N
/
N
W
O
po
z
O
O
9'N6
'
Z
Z
LU
Z
O
LO
(D O
Q Lo
N
O
x O
LU
O
O
O
0')
w O
00
00
U
v V
U
0
��=.
n
g
~
�m
Do
�aQ
2
a0
0
QW
ZIr
z
W
N
W
>
0=
m
u
W
0
W
C3 >
w
W
�✓
1/1
LL
J
I I
II
U) LLl
I ,
� Z
=
LU
1
IS
1
a > U
a of
J
�Y�"W
< O
E�
i m
frr
1
W
V
W
r
)
ON, Y
00
O
v
u
d'� v
w
J
o
Q
(1J
�l
V
l�
I� o
F Q
F
N
N o
I�
O
�
Nozz
o o CE
Lo
Q
�W
~
Z
W
Fa
z
H
u
u
rn
o
s
Q
J
W
U
W Q
U
Q
T¢
3
o
3
�
omm�
w
J
a
J }
Q �
a
~
z
W
z
z d'
o
Z
Q
H
O
H Z
O W
Li
W
0
J
m

Attachment 2
Federal Emergency Management Act
(FEMA) Flood Insurance Map

ba
1.>
d N
Q N
Iwj
U
d
Q
N 8
co
U
Q
(6 Iq
5
Co
)
"O >
`S
IYJ
IN,
(6
N
(6 W
O_ O
E 0
a) O
m N w �
.
3 3 `O
J
`m
x
N
m
C
O
Y V!
C 0 W
_ ca
°
v °`o�
ah jE 0
o
0
�
E
a)
C a
capes
a) a
�3as
�
E w T
o�� E
N v
>
O O N
C r,,,;, 0 'x: =
x
M,
O (6
Q C C
C
a)
V O
N O E
2 Q 0O y"
w V °- N
a)
LL w a)
Q ""� O m "0
V
V
3
o O J
a)
p_ "O
C
Y a)
V!
"6 U
'O
0 Y Co
.E
W T
-p IW (6
a) a) C
U a) O
o LLL c,,, 1
ci V IN N
0
O
a)
C
V% V
YO O
ci C �'
Y > O (6
N d
ca
'(p
N U
E N °
o a)-0
T W O T
U LL C N
a) O 0
`� Y
°p -0
0
Co Co O C
t V
H
(6 N V! 0'
N "O
LL
E
0
LL
N C
a) > 0
m N
a) a)
Q
>
a) a) T
j
4 N
4 C E a)
"6 V E
° �' E (a O
a) E "O
LL a)
U
C y
O x
Co
w
a)
a)
0
W m
)y
co
y
V U Q
Lei:. C
V
N0.> (6
0 m LL
Co '� O >
(6 ca aE• N
N 0
V° a) Z lO
C O a)
C
O
J
"O
C
a)
U 1
O 1 C j
i �i -6 C
C a) L
N V! D_
(6 U
V
0 Y Oi
D_
V V W
C LL
a) 00 a) (6
>> 113d a)
E E a) N
m IWLL O
m
C
C C N
as
U LL "' fn "
U
15 H 0 fn
U) o
ca
H m �i
U Y
a)
a
a) 4 a)
(6
a) OQ O °
v as
° °- N w d
a as v
m
Q
N
o tca
yCL
3 3
�� as a) as
0
as
o
as
m
w ° a w
m wo
_ °
° o
m
E
p.
o° a
v'
°w
ww ��0
-6
oEo�v
by
Icy a)
N ci
a)
"6
(6 d > d
t a)
d
w
d
(6 >
t a)
O (6 (6 V! E
0 (6
(6 O 6
O >.
ba O
U
C
V! '_
a > a)
W
C j QrF a) a)
O E=
a) N ' H
'E
O O a3
LL U Q J Q
Q
W
Q
U J
U U m J
U LL 2
Z
N L
c Q
LL EO
a�-� )y
w
N NI
w
I
Q J
toC
a as
Y w
3—
'N
E
03
_ i U O
>0ERE 0
o
o
m N
Z
m
D_ (6
LL 0 JLL
a) p N E "6 Q
o�
LLo
u�
Jug
�u�
u�
EEa�
U E
��oa)
CZ
as -a -tea
E-°p a)
Ow
fna
lL
X
X X
w�
2X
W
Z
D y
Q O T
L yaa)+
0 as 0
V y O L a)
�_
— a)v
Q y N C a)
�a
aN
wa
a
wU
OQ
a
0.
CO 0
�1
°`owx 17E
Eaa)ic°'cm
Jp
a�
�x
a
w
C7_
a
asp
w=�o
�°p�0
��w�a
Co 0
wEa)E�
t����"to
��
�o
x
~O
X
a
P-0P as
=
P as 3
P a)_LL
da
w0
F
u�x
rLL
O
0
0
ICD
N
0
0
Lo-
0
CD
-
CD
0
LID
M

Attachment 3
Information for Planning and
Consultation (IPaC Report)

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2023-0135166
Project Name: Samet Burnt Poplar Road Site
September 29, 2023
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

09/29/2023
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/endangered-species-consultation-
handbook.pdf
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts, see https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-bird-permit/what-
we-do.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures, see https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/threats-birds.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/partner/council-conservation-
migratory-birds.

09/29/2023
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries
• Bald & Golden Eagles
• Migratory Birds
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

09/29/2023
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2023-0135166
Project Name: Samet Burnt Poplar Road Site
Project Type: Clearing Land
Project Description: Outdoor Storage
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: L L,ps:��
�nrrnr ✓n �� � n �Il Il�Il Il ps/ a).'! ? -' i.91'76844900 31.83,.1.4z
d
Y ,
Counties: Guilford County, North Carolina

09/29/2023
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriest, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOA.A.1Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis sub flavus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: hops://css.fws.gsv/cp/spc,,s/1 C�S1_5
INSECTS
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https_//e_c.sus.fw .gQy_/ec_p/species/J.743
FLOWERING PLANTS
NAME
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https_//e_c.sus.fw .gQy_/ec_p/species/3849
Small Whorled Pogonia Isotria medeoloides
Population:
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: hops://css.fws.gsv/cp/spc,,es/1JC
STATUS
Proposed
Endangered
STATUS
Candidate
KIV ILIR
Endangered
Threatened

09/29/2023
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.
USFWS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE LANDS
AND FISH HATCHERIES
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the Nationat fldhfe ]&(j&a Q system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.
BALD & GOLDEN EAGLES
Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Acti and the
Migratory Bird Treaty ActZ.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to bald or
golden eagles, or their habitats3, should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Baid and Golden Ea e Protection Act of 1940.
2. The Kt �ILQr of 1918.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
There are bald and/or golden eagles in your project area.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME
BREEDING SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain
types of development or activities.

09/29/2023
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read the supplemental
information and specifically the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird
Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (IIIIIII)
Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project
overlaps during that week of the year.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire
range.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project area overlaps.
No Data ( -)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
IIII probability of presence breeding season I survey effort - no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle 1 i 1 4-1-1-4- 1 1
Non -BCC i 1 1 1 1 UIIU I»II» 1 L 0 1 1 1 1 i L i 1 1 i, L 1-1- i i 1-1-1- 1 1 i l
Vulnerable
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Managment pIl �ps:���nrrnrrnrn �nrs �� �pp��gp ,Il-LiL -Il�Il�,Il�� �Il-Il�igl
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds hqps:���nrrnrrnrnf'wsng���d_ap'.p�
'oHections/aavoic1<�jig.- i�d IlllIlIli�IlIlllIlIlZIli� Ili��Ildei��a�� �a��Se IlliIlIlgaLKy hIlIl'dS
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds LIgp.5: /1nLi !6LJ� s �)y�sat s� L-,-,q.�LLL ' lg!s�
cic)cuiTients/na c)nwicl -scarsclarcl-cc)nservat.ic)n-ITieasup' snp� '
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC ht�s:���nrrrnrnfwsng���
nied a/sllll pQeIlliIlenta infoIlIl�Ila��Il�Di� IlliIlIl Il'a���DIl IlIldS-a�i�d- a�Qd a�.i�d g�DQdei�-ea� QeS Il Ila�y-q��IllIl-

09/29/2023
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Acti and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection ActZ.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Ht �ILQr of 1918.
2. The Bail and _��� id 11 Ea e Protectionf ct of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY
OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME
SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention
Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea
Breeds Apr 28
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
to Jul 20
and Alaska.
https_//e_c.os.fws.
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
to Aug 25
and Alaska.
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Breeds Apr 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 20
and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Jul 31
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Sep 10
and Alaska.

09/29/2023
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions elsewhere
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 31
and Alaska.
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read the supplemental
information and specifically the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird
Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (IIIII)
Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project
overlaps during that week of the year.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire
range.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project area overlaps.
No Data ( -)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
IIII probability of presence breeding season I survey effort - no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle 1 L 1 L 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 UIIU UlIU11 L 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I, L L L L, L 1 L L 1 1 1 1 1 1.
Non -BCC
Vulnerable
Cerulean Warbler
} 1 I L
BCC Rangewide 1 I 1} I I} 1 1 L.0. e 1 L 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I, L I I Illtjll L 11 L L 1 1 L I ILL 1
(CON)
Chimney Swift P P
BCC R ngewide if) ��f ��� ��r���f �111 �111 ����f ��r �1� �11 ��r���111���111 tIII N �ll �jll I_
(CON)

Kentucky Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prairie BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Warblerotary. I... I... h,, I,,, I,,, L,, h.. ,,,�....,,.���%11�1 Ul�ll
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird I% I i I m. I IIIIDI L L L III ,I I I I L I I I I I L L L 9 I I I I, L 9 I I, i L L L L III m I l L L.
BCC -BCR
Wood Thrush4- i i -I- -I i i III � � � IIIIII �I i I I I i � ��. �. I .
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Management h. q )5: /�r�nr�nr.fws �)yL/ �gp ,Il-Il/ -Il ig. g�j lent
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds htLps:���nrrnrrnrnf'�nrsng���d_abr'.p�
CcDQ_Qect.ions/avc)along.-and-iTiiniiTiizing.-inCIldentat-take-rliIlIlg.r'aatc)Il`V-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds )�LLsats��f:dt�'ads�
documents/naaonwide-sty.ndard-conservation-measures.
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC pIl�ps:���nrrnrrn�nrs���
ll"liIle-°_d a�./SllllppQe-°iTie-°ntat_infcDIlllTIlaat.ic) .-iTiigLIIL rIly.-

09/29/2023
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency:
Private Entity
Name:
Dylan Irby
Address:
551 Piney Forest Rd
City:
Danville
State:
VA
Zip:
24540
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
4345480479

Attachment 4
T&E Species Letter

►'_'` Dewberry-
..,,
January 10, 2024
Laura J. Meyers, PWS
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Dewberry Engineers Inc. 434.797.4497
551 Piney Forest Road 434.797.4341 fax
Danville, VA 24540 www.dewberry.com
Reference: T & E Letter for SAW-2023-02252 Samet Burnt Poplar Road
Dear Ms. Meyers
The Samet Burnt Poplar Road site is located on a 5.25-acre wooded lot in Greensboro, North Carolina.
The project is proposed to be cleared and a pad created to be utilized as an outdoor storage area. Two
(2) flowering plants and one (1) mammal were named by the Information for Planning and Consultation
(IPaC) as being endangered, threatened, or proposed endangered.
Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzi) is listed as an endangered species by the IPaC. It is a
perennial flower that grows within forest openings and grasslands. No critical habitat was identified on the
IPaC. During the site visit no species were observed and no habitat was present due to continuous
mowing of the roadside.
The Small Whorled Pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) is listed as a threatened species by the IPaC. It is an
orchid found in mature hardwood stands consisting of beech, birch, maple, oak, and hickory. The growing
season for this orchid is from mid -May to mid -June. Habitat for this orchid is present however during a site
visit on June 30th the species was not observed.
The Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus) is listed proposed endangered by the IPaC. This bat is located
across the eastern and central United States. During the summer these bats can be found within forest
habitats roosting in dead and living trees. Bats in the southern part of the United States utilize road -
associated culverts to roost in during the winter months. During a site visit on December 18th, 2023, no
road -associated culverts were identified, and no species were observed.
Dewberry makes the conclusion that there is no potential to directly or indirectly harm or jeopardize the
existence of threatened or endangered species.
Please contact me with any questions or comments [e-mail] or (434)-549-8525
Sincerely,
Dylan T. Irby
Staff Environmental Scientist
Enclosures: IPaC Report
P:\50166067\Envir\PCN\PDF\2023.1.10 Samet Species letter.docx
Troy A. Shelton, PWS, PWD, NRP, VSWD
Senior Environmental Scientist
Environmental Department Manager

Attachment 5
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) Map

ti'oW L,(I:ho :I GovLTrill^
rlum�au��" NC D ' AR,rmEN ` OF
tU l G A`T'UIRAL ABA' c3w➢IuIII" RAL RESOURCE
IIIIIIIU , 11111111111,0
September 29, 2023
Dylan Irby
Dewberry Engineers Inc.
551 Piney Forest Rd
Danville, VA 24540
RE: Samet Burnt Poplar Road
Dear Dylan Irby:
PAir,u. Ffld.,h fln,ni
De!puly Dh ffCtulII",w HtetltaaI. e RrcW gr1iiaiinn
IR \�7�1:1�7�1GLE:�:3
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
h7tt �s11www Fws.c ovaoffices/llirector �l istOffices.c1m sLaLecode=,37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact the NCNHP at.naLur_�I_heri_Lag �_(udr7cr_rIc,c ay.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program

T
a
CO
z
U
N
z
Q
ai
O
�
�
o .
O
� �
a
N 4
O f6
�
N �
�
N a
O
z4
z
CO
�
� O
E E
N
C C
> >
co co
OU
}'..
Q Q
'O
O
O'. J J (n
a.N
n
p O
CO
CO
Q Q ro
U
o
N
c
OCC)
C
D
CC)
6
W
p
T
i n
CC)
f6
C I
O
cn
c
f0
m
cn
U
E
T_S
CC)Z
�
n
+
U
c-. U
U
O
Qi O O
0
O
n
a
+ O 0
U � n
ri Q
D
Cf) Cf)
o
z
a a E
a
n
�
�o
o
04
—
ro
O c >, >,
Cf) U
E
O
O u u z;
-
[
U
U
C,i
N
0
i
N
O
O
ra
CC)
C
N O
4
W
C
C
+�-+
O ' CC)
O
N
f0
�
C i
i U U }'
O
o
f6 f6
[ Q n
N
+
CC)Q
U
Ci Q
4J i U7
O O
Z
Q
E i Q Q�
O .-
u cUOO�
�T
0
oEoo�
Cf)
CC)
3 Q
'� �
a
� E
vu
�
cc)e U, U,
O
Q
c
ccoQ.
E
n
f6
0 0 a)g
a
W
Z
c C >0 >,
N
0
CC) CO,
Z
Z
2:2(:)-(:)-Z
ooN
y
I
N
a

0
ry
m
0-
0
n
a)
E
m
C/)
66
00
It
w
r)
—r
z
0
z
61
0
(JA>J,j 0
0 1 V
LO
07
z
J-5)
P8 6UMAli; S
dt
ryY
M
0
(JA>J,j 0
0 1 V
LO
07
z
J-5)
P8 6UMAli; S
dt
ryY
M

Attachment 6
Antecedent Precipitation Tool (APT) Report

N
C
O O
�p Crn
V
t0
7
M
'
N
�
F �
O N
-0
V
O, c6
Z O
o
N
c6 �
y K Z
T
(6
— ❑ r
�
N rl
❑ O Om
�
M
M
r
U..
Q O
N
Z
L
m
N
i
Vt
01
ai
C
O
-O
�
rl O
O
Zm
iE
I
I
It
rl �
N
O
N
N
M
O
N
i
C
d
In t0Lo
O1
O
Q
O Cl
—
CP r
C
>
o
V
N
w
�m
N
qo
L
a
=
m a
N
LDE
E
E
N o
-6
C
O
Z
O
Z
y
T
O
aJ
❑
v
O
N
T T
v,..v,.. N
O
C
2
o rn
a
a,
o m
N
Aq
*amuw
'..
N
m
�
rl
00
�
O
W
M
�No
-2
ai a
1� h
o
rn �
—
a
o rn
M M
rl
O
�
n
L!1
T M
'um.O
N
C
N
to
In
Q d
Vuuw N
=--
M
O
N
m
p g
o
m =
N
N
N
M
y
Z
O
M
W
W
L
GJ
m
Q O
a%
C
m
M
O
O
O
O
M
M
M
will
0
N
N
N
O
CD
TN
O
'V J 4.ry
O
N
n 4r.r
rj
�
nr a n a
�
•� CJ 6J.d
J
^
N
❑
C
Ll
Np
'A
o
o is
x
m
st /
�„
V
y
w
7"
O
_
a
u 'I
0mui

Attachment 7
Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination (PJD)

'R E IR E "JCI I':.r"l' 1661""il l
�NAuu
Ila
NOVEMBER 17, 2023
REVISED: JANUARY 23, 2024
frif Dewberry
U IIIIIIU I11%111II"'I"""III"' III:::::: III' IIIIIIU y
II :Iru II .0 l,luu a°: Ilinc
551 II °"liu II:,uu°l II 1:u::,a:l
:,auWIIIII(:), VA 2,45,40
u14314 f 97f 1 1197'
U IIIIIIU I11%1III"'I"""I III:::::: III'' I (
USACU I WIIII tiII Pc, iiI II: Iistl,Il licl,
3331 II (:II IItl ally: 11 I N,a l : Il:: a uV(: W 11 A'
C:; ii cflh iin a 27587
I lly ullllull"^l� 11111 (OUS:,CE� U,au°Illy ��lill

jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
W!Wngton 01strid
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
littp://www,.saw.Lisacc.aniiy.iiiiI/Missiotis/RegitIatoryPeriiiitPrograiii/Contact/Co,untyLoccitor,aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: (910) 251-46 10
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This forin, must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to startia work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Burnt Poplar Road
City, State: Greensboro, NC
County: Guilford
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 7824866886
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Troy Shelton
Mailing Address: 551 Piney Forest Rd, Danville, VA
24540
Telephone Number: 49-8525
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
F✓I I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: 101 Chimmney Rock LLC
Mailing Address: 5942 Tarleton Dr, Oak Ridge, NC
27310
Telephone Number: 33 - 4-2643
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
'- Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION' 4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U,S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 1, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property,
Print Name
Capacity: Owner [:]Authorized Agent'
�zq $ -,
Date", A 0(
Si
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
Fj I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
F-1 I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority,
R I intend to cons truct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
rorcess.
V]T intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process,
1:1 1 intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
F:;9 A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
riI intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land,
Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
W/11
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United State:s"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
""preliminary's in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
E] I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act, Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C,F,R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website, A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331,2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional infortriation
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Ve
r---_i
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
RISize of Property or Review Area 5.26 acres.
FV The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Versioir May 2017 Page 4

jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 36-07331 0
Longitude: -79.917759
FV A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 1. 1 x 17 and should contain the following: ("Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved) .6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Fonn or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or' non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non: jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction, These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
WlCompleted Wetland Deten-nination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
Please refer to tire guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. litti)://wNvw,saw.tisace.ari-iiy.niiI/Missioiis/Regulatol-y-Pel,mit-
ProgranOtff isdiction/
Version! May 2017 Page 5

jurisdictional Determination Request
fz Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form.
+ PJDs please complete a Prelitninaa Jurisdictional Determination Fo -mn' and include; the
Aquatic Resource Table
+ AJDrs, please c crinplete an A )roved Jurisdictional Determination Forms
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USES Topographic Map
z Soil Survey Map
❑v ether Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Welland. Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/'or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
1-1 Other Assessment Forms
www.saw.Lisacc,ai-m .mil./Porta'ls/59/docs/re�ilatoi /rc gdocs/Jl)/PGL, 09-02 ALL A Prelim JD Form tillablej)df
$ Please see htq):/,/%vwwv.saw,usacc.arni.mil/Missions/Pe,,tilator Permit-P'ro&=rani/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within theproject area subject to federaljurisdictionunder the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state„ and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of public notice as required by federal
law, Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided„ the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

IIIIIIIIIIII u IIIp 1
IIIIIIIIIIII
un noon un
IIIrIIII non III j Ii III

. . . .. .. ...
qq,
I

IIIIIIIIIIII IIIII
IIIIIIIIIII IIIII u IIIp
USGS qpogirqplhicI

...... ...
..........
0
........ . . ...........
Cc,
C11 . . . . .. ..... ..... .. .... ... ........ .
y.
...... . . ..
...... ... .
... ... .. . . .
7
h1i..... ... ........... ... .. . ..
.. .. . . . ...... . . ........... .
TRIEN WAYROJE.''...,
....... .. . .... f, .. .. ......
. .... .............. ... .. ............ .... .. ..... . . . . . .. .. .. .. ..
j/,
. . ... .... .... .... . . . ... ........ /�
.... ..... .
ad 3olle
A I
�"STAGIE COACH TRL
.. .. . . . . . . .
E E
SjA6E,COAC14�,,�
.
.. .. . ..... �5
m
Ln
r-
C4
r-
m
r,
r,
(1)
o
t,6
cy)
M
r
4 . .. .......
. . . ..
. .. ...
............ . ..
LQ
c
'WING,
...... .. .. .
...... .... .. . . . .. ... .... ... . . ...
K3
lip ..............
C-11111.
0)
uu
C)
cu
0
Z:
............
fi'
..............
. .... ....
..........
0)
cl)
.. .. .. .. . .
....... ..
.
'006
fl
If
. . .... . ...... ..
.... ........ .
PQ
jay ,t
"A N11
40

IIIIIIIIIIII IIIII
IIIIIIIIIII IIIII u IIIp
Natiaiir4l WetlaindIII " III" III

K
n
0Ol
o'er, ,
y
�(D19lr{PI9�baNf(�fiJ4%Jpq(w
)ffJ{i) o, 6
)��1JUYhi%� f
f Ii&rv,
II % "
r
r
a
`o
? m
w L
w
o
LL o
s
a
T w as
L a
a
m o
H (m �
>.
m
Z
o m >
a3
mow?
m
o ° E
UL
Q o (0 3
o a a
° 3`
o CL
O o U CL
O L U co
N C N o
cCL
o
a m a E c
LOaas
w w
a)
r o as a)
H U)
N
C
Y
�
�
Co
O
C
co
C
co
�
L
C
p
O
W
LL
0-
co
co
co
y
fA
fA
L
L
L
LL
LL
LL
a�
0-
Co
o
�
c
c
co
co
co
co
Y
N
N
y
C
C
co
co
N
a�
y
w
w
N
C
N
C
+'

IIIIIIIIIIII IIIII
IIIIIIIIIII IIIII u IIIII
"" I IIIII
Soidl Survey

0
597290
36o 4' 28" N
36o 4' 15" N
Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Guilford County, North Carolina
(Samet Burnt Poplar Road)
597330 597370 597410 597450 597490
597290 597330 597370 597410 597450 597490
0
Map Scale: 1:1,900 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
Meters
N 0 25 50 100 150
Feet
0 50 100 200 500
Map projection: Web Mercator Conermordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: lfrM Zone 17N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Iiiiiiiiiiiii Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
597530
597530
597570
36o 4' 28" N

7 (U
O
U
o Q
0
U`I �
'E m
o- E
m m
U
rn
U
O
m
7
m p
m
U)
0)
00
U
O
U) O
O
U)
m
y E
fUA
N
O E
CL
s
m
m
m
Z
m
E
0)
O_ N O
m
O
N
0) `' N a
0) m
(n
O
E
N
U) O
N y
O
U)
O_ m
m O E 0
O
L
m
O_ 1
C (U N O
U
a
m N
O
Q
0)
m y �
O
U)
0) CJ
O
Z
U N
U)
U U) -O
Q
y
O O
O O "J L
O_
m
(n
O d
� 0) �_ m
0) � y 3 m
Q
L O
V- N
2i
0
'6
0)
O N>
� 0)
N
E
U W
m Q
U
Z 00
m
Q
y m 0)
O
Q O
U m= 0)
L
y
C y m
O-
0)
(U
0 w Q
O
0
O
=
y E tl) �
(6
O
U (U
(6 'O � C O
0)
O
� (n
N
O
fl- � �j O
LL
>
j
p 0 0)
C >
C
30 i
> O U
_
30 _
U)
0
E >, m N
Z
N
C O L
O
0) 2
E '� 0) (U
O
Ci O
O-
m N
U
N
N
N
U
0) O O_ 7
m V
y
— O
O 0) CL
tl)
.O
N
N
Q O
N 3
Q
u) E
N
3 J
O
(n a) C y
N—
N
7
Ur i
N
Q
U)
t 0 0
(6
E
o
O_ 0 0)
m
a)
m
Z E
Q Q U U)
a) o .o
Utl)
a) a)
m
N
(U
0 N O�a
-. -0 'E
U)
O
rn
E C y
T .2
L N N jU
O) (6
m
m 0)
E
O O) (D
�j
0) U)
>,
U
0) (6 (6 U
.N C
N
0)
m
>+
O '6 (U
7
O
(n
C m N y
0) jp E O)
O 0)
>+
3
(n 0)
.J 2i C m N
7
U .0
7
Q (U
.y-�
E
7 o
m
s c (n E
O_ m
y
O
C
E 0) .�
N 'O y
E
N
O= m
O C
E O U
O a
O p U 0 ..'
'6 N
O>
O O
0)
m
O '6
0
O O
U)
i
m
C (6
Q 0)
0) 7
U) U)
O
'O
y U C
Q 0)
3 >+
(n 0)
E O
� O)
O .Q 0) C
ON.
O 'N C U
N 0)
09 O
(U O n �_
0 7
O N
m
m
L
O
W E— U y
a E
(n > U
U
Q'6 Q m
L
H O
(n (n
1 �
O
O N
L O t
H U U)
y
N
L
T
L
CL
�
°'
y y
y o m
o
r
O
0
C m
O
N
U) U
J
Q
R
O
C
O
y
W
C
R Iw
( u
/^
V
F
m
m
W
a
a
o
N
o o
0) LO
-
o
o o -
o
o
o o
m
N
.-. 0) (O
o O O
y O
N o
Cl)0
O
O .-.
o
`p O
d) (O N
O O Cl)0
O
o O
`p
.-.
o
O
d)
O
(O N
O M
O
o O
0
`p
U
a
C
.-.
O
O
0)a
y
CM,)
.0 a
a
O
y
(O
ro
Cl)
.0 a
a
N
y
Q 0
0 a a a
a
c
a
a a a
0
a
a
a a
H
a > > >
> o
o >
> > >
o o
a >
>
> >
o o y
Q
y
p) 2 2 2
c
2 Z
Z p) 2
c
2 2 2
Z Z
p) 2
c
2
2 2
Z Z
(n
C
O
� ® ❑ ❑
❑ El
0 �
IW',
=
R
LL
d .-
y
y
y
q, 'M,
k %
y
R
O
m
Z

Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Guilford County, North Carolina
Samet Burnt Poplar Road
Hydric Rating by Map Unit
Map unit symbol
Map unit name
Rating
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CrB
Coronaca clay loam, 2
0
5.8
68.5%
to 6 percent slopes
McE2
Madison clay loam, 15
0
0.0
0.5%
to 25 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
MhC2
Mecklenburg sandy clay
0
1.2
14.3%
loam, 6 to 10 percent
slopes, moderately
eroded
MuB
Mecklenburg -Urban land
0
1.4
16.6%
complex, 2 to 10
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
8.6
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/29/2023
Iiiiiiiiiiiii Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5

Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Guilford County, North Carolina
Samet Burnt Poplar Road
Description
This rating indicates the percentage of map units that meets the criteria for hydric
soils. Map units are composed of one or more map unit components or soil
types, each of which is rated as hydric soil or not hydric. Map units that are made
up dominantly of hydric soils may have small areas of minor nonhydric
components in the higher positions on the landform, and map units that are made
up dominantly of nonhydric soils may have small areas of minor hydric
components in the lower positions on the landform. Each map unit is rated based
on its respective components and the percentage of each component within the
map unit.
The thematic map is color coded based on the composition of hydric
components. The five color classes are separated as 100 percent hydric
components, 66 to 99 percent hydric components, 33 to 65 percent hydric
components, 1 to 32 percent hydric components, and less than one percent
hydric components.
In Web Soil Survey, the Summary by Map Unit table that is displayed below the
map pane contains a column named 'Rating'. In this column the percentage of
each map unit that is classified as hydric is displayed.
Hydric soils are defined by the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils
(NTCHS) as soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding
long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the
upper part (Federal Register, 1994). Under natural conditions, these soils are
either saturated or inundated long enough during the growing season to support
the growth and reproduction of hydrophytic vegetation.
The NTCHS definition identifies general soil properties that are associated with
wetness. In order to determine whether a specific soil is a hydric soil or nonhydric
soil, however, more specific information, such as information about the depth and
duration of the water table, is needed. Thus, criteria that identify those estimated
soil properties unique to hydric soils have been established (Federal Register,
2002). These criteria are used to identify map unit components that normally are
associated with wetlands. The criteria used are selected estimated soil properties
that are described in "Soil Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 1999) and "Keys to Soil
Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 2006) and in the "Soil Survey Manual" (Soil Survey
Division Staff, 1993).
If soils are wet enough for a long enough period of time to be considered hydric,
they should exhibit certain properties that can be easily observed in the field.
These visible properties are indicators of hydric soils. The indicators used to
make onsite determinations of hydric soils are specified in "Field Indicators of
Hydric Soils in the United States" (Hurt and Vasilas, 2006).
References:
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/29/2023
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 5

Hydric Rating by Map Unit —Guilford County, North Carolina
Samet Burnt Poplar Road
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18.
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources
Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436.
Soil Survey Staff. 2006. Keys to soil taxonomy. 10th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Percent Present
Component Percent Cutoff.- None Specified
Tie -break Rule: Lower
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/29/2023
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 5

IIIh iII
Wetlaind Ekhilbit

IIII IIIIIIII
(IIII" (IIII IIIIII
IIIIIIII

-nM
Client:
Samet Corporation
Project Number:
50166067
Site Name:
Burnt Poplar Road
Site Location:
Greensboro, NC
r6@'50)f
w %F

-nM
Client:
Samet Corporation
Project Number:
50166067
Site Name:
Burnt Poplar Road
Site Location:
Greensboro, NC
r6@'50)f
w %F

-nM
Client:
Samet Corporation
Project Number:
50166067
Site Name:
Burnt Poplar Road
Site Location:
Greensboro, NC
r6@'50)f
w %F

-nM
Client:
Samet Corporation
Project Number:
50166067
Site Name:
Burnt Poplar Road
Site Location:
Greensboro, NC
r6@'50)f
w %F

-nM
Client:
Samet Corporation
Project Number:
50166067
Site Name:
Burnt Poplar Road
Site Location:
Greensboro, NC
r6@'50)f
w %F

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp:1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.•
See ERDC/EL TR-12-9; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Samet Burnt Poplar Road City/County: Greensboro/Guilford Sampling Date: 6/30/2023
Applicant/Owner: Samet Corporation State: NC Sampling Point: DP1
Investigator(s): Katherine Shumaker/Rachel Manning -Dewberry Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): <5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N, MLRA 126 Lat: 36.071878 Long:-79.918521 Datum: WGS1984
Soil Map Unit Name: Mecklenburg sandy clay loam, 6-10% slopes, moderately eroded NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland WA. Cowardin Classification: PFO
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
X Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0.25
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Soil pit depth - 14 inches
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1
r\Dsoiute
uominant
inaicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
30
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acerrubrum
30
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 55.6% (A/B)
60
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
12
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
OBL species 10 x 1 = 10
1.
Elaeagnus umbellata
20
Yes
UPL
FACW species 35 x 2 = 70
2.
Ligustrum sinense
15
Yes
FACU
FAC species 50 x 3 = 150
3.
Cornus florida
5
No
FACU
FACU species 60 x 4 = 240
4.
UPL species 20 x 5 = 100
5.
Column Totals: 175 (A) 570 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.26
40
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20
20% of total cover:
8
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10, )
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1.
Ilex opaca
10
Yes
FACU
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
2.
Acerrubrum
10
Yes
FAC
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4.
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
20 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1.
Onoclea sensibilis
25
Yes
FACW
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2.
Juncus effusus
10
Yes
FACW
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3.
Carex lurida
10
Yes
OBL
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4.
Microstegium vimineum
5
No
FAC
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Verbesina alternifolia
5
No
FAC
Shrub -Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
9
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody Vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
55 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
28
20% of total cover:
11
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
1.
N/A
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 3/1 100 Loamy/Clayey
5-12 10YR 5/2 98 7.5YR 5/8 2 C PUM Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp:1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.•
See ERDC/EL TR-12-9; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Samet Burnt Poplar Road City/County: Greensboro/Guilford Sampling Date: 6/30/2023
Applicant/Owner: Samet Corporation State: NC Sampling Point: DP2
Investigator(s): Katherine Shumaker/Rachel Manning -Dewberry Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): <5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N, MLRA 126 Lat: 36.071879 Long:-79.918158 Datum: WGS1984
Soil Map Unit Name: Mecklenburg sandy clay loam, 6-10% slopes, moderately eroded NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland WA. Cowardin Classification: PSS
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0.25
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Soil pit depth - 14 inches
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) % Cover Species? Status
1. N/A
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
1. N/A
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10, )
1.
Baccharis halimifolia
60
Yes
FACW
2.
Salix nigra
20
Yes
OBL
3.
Juniperus virginiana
10
No
FACU
4.
Alnus serrulata
5
No
OBL
5.
6.
95
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
48
20% of total cover:
19
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1.
Juncus effusus
40
Yes
FACW
2.
Carex lurida
10
No
OBL
3.
Solidago gracillima
10
No
OBL
4.
Dichanthelium clandestinum
5
No
FAC
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
65
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
33
20% of total cover:
13
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
1.
N/A
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
3 (A)
3 (B)
100.0% (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
45
x 1 =
45
FACW species
100
x 2 =
200
FAC species
5
x 3 =
15
FACU species
10
x 4 =
40
UPL species
0
x 5 =
0
Column Totals:
160
(A)
300 (B)
Prevalence Index
= B/A =
1.88
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub -Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-14 5Y 6/1 80 7.5YR 5/8 20 C PUM Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp:1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.•
See ERDC/EL TR-12-9; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Samet Burnt Poplar Road City/County: Greensboro/Guilford Sampling Date: 6/30/2023
Applicant/Owner: Samet Corporation State: NC Sampling Point: DP4
Investigator(s): Katherine Shumaker/Rachel Manning -Dewberry Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): <5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N, MLRA 126 Lat: 36.071878 Long:-79.918521 Datum: WGS1984
Soil Map Unit Name: Mecklenburg sandy clay loam, 6-10% slopes, moderately eroded NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Upland Data Point
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Soil pit depth- 12 Inches
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP4
Absolute uominant
indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
30 Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2. Acerrubrum
30 Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3. Quercus alba
20 Yes
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
80 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. Quercus alba
15 Yes
FACU
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
15 Yes
FAC
FAC species 60 x 3 = 180
3. Acer rubrum
15 Yes
FAC
FACU species 65 x 4 = 260
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5.
Column Totals: 125 (A) 440 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.52
45 =Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
23 20% of total cover:
9
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
2.
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4.
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2.
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub -Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
9
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/2 100
4-12 7.5YR 5/8 100
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

IIII IIIIIII
iiiio iII IIIIIIO
noon in
n iii iii n iii iiiin iiii iiii iii F` iiiriiim
n irs i o in 4.11

N( lll)W'Ql Strewn Ideialificadairi Form Version 4.11
Date. . . ..... PirojecUWW I atftude�
.... . .. .............. . ....
Evaluatoii% County
e N (r,I Ong tllwlqle
I II ,131ream is at �eastmhqunpgfent 01 SPeani Detei=htiatiovi (chivle ovilip) Othen ,
W'? I . 9 or 09(enrM.W'd k 30" Epheii-neiral firflermiftend: Perei-iiiMal e 9 �Qia�d Naaw

INC Men IllifiviI IlI Vers
PiItw,"), met rill Latitiudc M I
17,
EvaIlualtoii% GoillAnty, III loiiiiiulll
9l;ill In t s Strew" lll:)Oe naajion cilrde I Otheir
Stm%quy Isal Wout OlowdBn farq
PereminlIM 111,11 V, Quad Napnw! EV ?rvotellTill
A, Gec)rTlorphiobgy (SullI
Absent
Watic
ModIII late
Stronig
la Conlinuity of channiall Rued and barilk
0
1
2
2&nuosfty of I ll aonIl g hahNP g
,
I
M
1
3
3. lin-iI stmch.Are: ex, irliffle-pooll,' Step-pooli,
G-)
2
3
4. Pairtude size uVallmairn substrate
10
�2
3
5. Acthweffiollict floodpIlain
0
2
3
15 Deposilhoinai Ibairs or 111
0
2
3
W.
Recant Wlliuvi,delplosits
0
...............................................................................................................................................
1 2
.................................
8 Headcuts
0
9, 11 coiiI
0 5
:5
10, 1% hu'all valley
"I'l""I'll""I'll'll""I'll""�! ...................................................................................................................................................................... .
ID
ETH-L-
10 5
.—
1A5
I I . Secorid or greatirm, onder channiell
::.... ==C�1D'I
01
Y,LS::::::::
3
arfificial Otiches are ind imod„ see dis,cussIions !in III
. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
d obgy �§�Ptqllal if -
12 Pirmence of Bam:fflow
— -
13 111 oxhI 11L)acteda
I
0
1
-
CS
-,,,—,, ...................
�3
14 Leaf fitter
. ............. P'-
1
VI-5, Sediment On piants or debd s
11.
11
1 51
16 . Organic dell::vhs I oir 11
1
L5
Sod -based evidence of hii hwabertallble?
9
. ...... . .......... ..........
.............. ...... ................................................................................................................................
cl ID
................................................ —
�wN
(lSijbtoital;::m C. Blicflio� IV
I 1B, Fibro u Is rx) o"ll s i r� shearribed
:2
.. . ... .. .... . ..... ..... ... . .. . . ........ .... , , .
19 IRooIked II plants !in sh-earnbed:
2
1
10
210,
. . .
..............
21 Aquak hildlusliks
1
2
3
22 ill::11sh
05
Ill 5
23 0'ayfish
24, Arnphfl.�iians
5. Algae
NiAriefland pull"'ftII in streaintwd
FAGW 0 75', C, 113 L 151 Otheii 10
Seellp WrAntainluall
Rotes,
&,'xetldc