20151006 Ver 1_FlintRock Farm #2 Baseline Doc Report_20150722

FINAL
PRESERVATION PROJECT AND
BASELINE DOCUMENTATION REPORT
FLINT ROCK FARM #2
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
EEP Project No. 92812
Cape Fear River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03030002
Prepared for:
r�
iaoi sotem
d ROM
PROGRAM
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
217 West Jones Street, Suite 3000A
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Prepared by:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
March 2015

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Flint Rock Farm #2 Site (Site) is located in southwest Rockingham County, approximately
8.5 miles west of the Town of Reidsville and 9.5 miles north of the City of Greensboro within
the Cape Fear River Basin along Troublesome Creek. The Site contains headwater streams in
the Troublesome Creek stream system, which is currently affected by numerous stressors causing
stream channel erosion and habitat degradation. Current agricultural and stormwater runoff, and
increasing growth and development pressures within the watershed are becoming of greater
concern making preservation of Site streams, wetlands, and riparian areas vital to maintaining
water quality of water supply reservoirs and aquatic habitat.
This preservation report has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title
33 Navigation and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section § 332.8 paragraphs (c)(2)
through (c)(14) and 332.3(h); and NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fee
Instrument signed and dated July 28, 2010.
Site Description
Project Name and EEP Project Number
County
General Location
Basin
Physiographic Region
USGS Hydro Unit
NCDWQ Sub -basin
Watershed Planning Information
Preservation Mechanism
Conservation Values
Deed Recordation Date
Total Credit Linear
Footage /Acreage
Total Mitigation Units
Flint Rock Farm #2 - Project #92812
Rockingham
9.5 miles north of Greensboro
Cape Fear
Piedmont
03030002
03 -06 -01
TLW 03030002010010
Troublesome and Little Troublesome Creek LWP
Conservation Easement
Permanently preserves headwater streams, wetlands,
and riparian buffers of the Troublesome Creek stream
system within the Lake Reidsville and Jordan Lake
Watersheds (two water supply reservoirs).
December 30, 2008
Mitigation Assets
Warm Riparian Non - riparian Riparian Buffer
Stream Wetland Wetland
3686.271f 7.35 acres 0.13 acres 555,893.95 sq. ft.
737 SMUs 1.47 WMUs 0.03 WMUs 100,542 BMUs
Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Project
EEP ID 92812 Executive Summary Page i

Conservation values for this Site include the following.
• Permanently preserves headwater streams, wetlands, and riparian buffers of the
Troublesome Creek stream system within the Lake Reidsville and Jordan Lake
Watersheds (two water supply reservoirs).
A conservation easement deed was recorded on December 30, 2008 and is included in Appendix
B.
Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Project
EEP ID 92812 Executive Summary Page ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVESUMMARY .............................................................................. ............................... i
1.0 PRESERVATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .................. ............................... 1
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................... ............................... 1
2.1 General Description .............................................................................. ............................... 1
2.2 Directions ............................................................................................... ..............................2
3.0 SITE SELECTION ................................................................................... ............................... 2
4.0 BASELINE INFORMATION .................................................................. ............................... 2
4.1 Physical Features .................................................................................. ............................... 2
4.2 Plant and Wildlife Communities ........................................................... ............................... 2
4.3 Jurisdictional Streams ........................................................................... ............................... 3
4.4 Jurisdictional Wetlands ......................................................................... ............................... 3
5.0 SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT ..................................................... ............................... 4
5.1 Encumbrances ....................................................................................... ............................... 4
6.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS .......................................................... ............................... 4
7.0 LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................................. ............................... 6
8.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES .................................................................. ............................... 6
9.0 REFERENCES ......................................................................................... ............................... 6
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Figures and Photographs
Figure 1. Site Protection Instrument
Figure 2. Vicinity Map
Figure 3. Site Watershed Map
Figure 4. Site Mitigation Assets Map
Site Photographs
Appendix B. Site Protection Instruments
Appendix C. Stream Forms
Appendix D. Wetland Forms
Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Project
EEP ID 92812 Table of Contents Page i

1.0 PRESERVATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Site (Site) is located in the 03030002 Cataloging Unit
(CU), in the Cape Fear River Basin. The Site is located within Targeted Local Watershed
(TLW) 03 03 0002010010 and the Troublesome and Little Troublesome Creeks Local Watershed
Plan Summary (NCEEP 2004). Based on the Local Watershed Plan and the Cape Fear River
Basin Restoration Priorities (NCEEP 2009) stressors within the Troublesome Creek watershed
include the following.
• Stream Channel Erosion
• Sedimentation
• Fecal Coliform Bacteria
• Habitat Degradation
• Stormwater and Agricultural Runoff
• Increasing Growth and Development Pressures
The Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Site addresses watershed stressors /issues with the
following goals.
• Protection of water quality in the Lake Reidsville and Jordan Lake Watersheds (two
water supply reservoirs) by preserving wetlands and riparian buffers within the Site in a
permanent conservation easement.
• Permanent preservation of headwater streams and associated wetlands and riparian
buffers in the Troublesome Creek stream system and Lake Reidsville watershed, which is
affected by stormwater and agricultural runoff, and increasing development pressure
making the TLW a priority for stream and wetland preservation (NCEEP 2009).
• Permanent preservation of headwater streams and associated wetlands and riparian
buffers in the Troublesome Creek stream system and Lake Reidsville watershed, where
water quality and aquatic habitat are threatened by continued growth and expansion of
the Triad Metropolitan Region, which has a significant potential to increase nutrient
loading in Lake Reidsville and cause degrading stream erosion and instability due to the
highly erodible soils in the watershed (NCEEP 2004).
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
2.1 General Description
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) has established the Flint Rock
Farm #2 Preservation Site located off of U.S. Highway 158 in the southwest portion of
Rockingham County. The Site is located in two parcels, PIN- 795200627891 and PIN -
795200515608, within 14 -digit Cataloging Unit 03030002010010 (sub -basin 03- 06 -01) of the
Cape Fear River Basin, and is part of the Lake Reidsville and Jordan Lake Watersheds (two
water supply reservoirs) (Figures 1 -3, Appendix A). The Site is protected by a permanent
conservation easement recorded in Deed Book 1365 Pages 1274 -1285. Current land use at the
Site is comprised of mixed hardwood forest, and land surrounding the Site consists primarily of
mixed hardwood forest and pasture primarily grazed by horses. The conservation easement
boundary is well- marked with signs at each corner.
Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Project
EEP ID 92812 Page 1

2.2 Directions
Directions to the Site from Raleigh (Figure 2, Appendix A):
➢ Take I -40 West to exit 140 (University Drive),
➢ Turn right onto University Drive and travel 1.9 miles,
➢ Turn left onto Westbrook Avenue and travel 0.6 miles,
➢ Take a right onto Springwood Avenue followed by an immediate left onto Burke Street,
➢ Turn left onto Main Street then right onto Wharton Avenue/NC -61 N,
➢ Follow NC -61 N for 9.7 miles, then turn left onto Osceola - Ossipee Road (NC -150 W),
➢ Follow NC -150 W for 10.9 miles, then turn right onto N Church Street,
➢ After 4.1 miles, turn left onto US -158 W,
➢ The Site is on the right after 2.2 miles on Flintrock Trail.
➢ Site Latitude, Longitude: 36.28208, - 79.82494 (NAD83/WGS84)
3.0 SITE SELECTION
The Site contains headwater streams in the Troublesome Creek stream system and Lake
Reidsville Watershed, which is currently affected by numerous stressors including increased
fecal coliform bacteria, bank erosion, sedimentation, and habitat degradation resulting primarily
from current agricultural runoff and expanding development.
Conservation Values
Permanently preserves headwater streams, wetlands, and riparian buffers of the Troublesome
Creek stream system and Lake Reidsville and Jordan Lake Watersheds (two water supply
reservoirs).
Threats of Adverse Modification
Adjacent agricultural land and increasing growth and development pressures adjacent to the Site
threaten Site streams, wetlands, and buffers; therefore, preservation of the Site is important to
maintaining water quality and habitat in the Troublesome Creek watershed, and ultimately within
the Lake Reidsville and Jordan Lake Watersheds.
4.0 BASELINE INFORMATION
4.1 Physical Features
The Site lies within the Northern Inner Piedmont ecoregion of the Piedmont physiographic
region of North Carolina. Topography within the ecoregion is generally comprised of dissected
irregular plans, low to high hills, ridges, and isolated monadnocks, and low- to moderate -
gradient streams with mostly cobble, gravel, and sandy substrates. Topography within the Site is
moderate with elevations ranging from 760 feet on Troublesome Creek to 840 feet above sea
level at the top of the Stream 1.
4.2 Plant and Wildlife Communities
The natural communities dominating the Site are Piedmont Bottomland Forest within the
floodplains and Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont subtype) on the upland side slopes.
The vegetation is mature with a relatively full canopy throughout. Characteristic species include
red maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), American beech (Fagus
grandifolia), swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera),
cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda), river birch (Betula nigra), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis),
Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Project
EEP ID 92812 Page 2

shagbark hickory (Carya ovata), white oak (Quercus alba), ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana),
eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), American elm (Ulmus americana), willow oak
(Quercus phellos), southern red oak (Quercus falcata), American holly (Ilex opaca), strawberry
bush (Euonymous americanus), greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), muscadine (Muscadinia
rotundifolia), blackberry (Rubus sp.), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), crossvine
(Bignonia capreolata), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), Christmas fern (Polystichum
acrostichoides), and microstegium (Microstegium vimeneum). Wetland areas within the study
area also contain species such as crimson -eyed rosemallow (Hibiscus moscheutos), tearthumb
(Polygonum sagittatum), false nettle (Boehmeria cylindrica), and soft rush (Juncus effusus).
4.3 Jurisdictional Streams
Watershed Summary
The Site provides water quality function to a 0.18- square mile (100 -acre) watershed at the Site
outfall into Troublesome Creek (Figure 3, Appendix A). The Site drainage area is primarily
composed of agricultural and forested land.
Reach Summary
The Site borders Troublesome Creek and contains 4 jurisdictional stream reaches (2 perennial, 1
intermittent, and 1 that is both perennial and intermittent), which total 4083.58 linear feet of
stream; the table below gives information for each reach. Buffer widths vary for each reach
ranging from buffer on one side of the stream only to greater than 100 feet from the top of bank
on both sides of the stream; more detailed buffer width information is included in Section 6.0
(Determination of Credits) below. Site streams drain to Troublesome Creek, which is listed as
Water Supply — III and Nutrient Sensitive Waters by the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources (NCDWR 2013).
An approximately 8 -foot wide horse trail was observed crossing the Site, including a wooden
bridge over the stream (Figure 4, Appendix A). An additional horse trail, approximately 4 feet
wide, was observed running adjacent to the stream for about 300 feet before turning out of the
easement into the gas line easement (Figure 4, Appendix A). Additionally, a large beaver dam
on Troublesome Creek at the north end of the site is impounding water into the site (Figure 4,
Appendix A). Otherwise, no areas of concern were observed; all stream reaches within the Site
are stable.
4.4 Jurisdictional Wetlands
The Site contains 4 jurisdictional wetland systems, which total 7.47 acres; the table below gives
information for each system.
Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Project
EEP ID 92812 Page 3
Jurisdictional Stream Characteristics
Depicted on
Depicted on
Drainage
USACE
Length
Type
Yp
NRCS Soil
USGS
Area (acres)
Form Score
(linear Feet)
Map
Stream 1
Perennial
No
No
18/75
68/59
3025.53
Stream 2
Intermittent /Perennial
No
No
95
67
359.97
Stream 3
Perennial
No
No
10
--
364.09
Stream 4
Intermittent
No
No
7
66
69.17
Total
4083.58
4.4 Jurisdictional Wetlands
The Site contains 4 jurisdictional wetland systems, which total 7.47 acres; the table below gives
information for each system.
Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Project
EEP ID 92812 Page 3

Jurisdictional Wetland Characteristics
5.0 SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT
The land required for stewardship of this mitigation project includes portions of the following
parcels. Copies of the recorded conservation easement deeds are included in Appendix B.
Site
Type (Riparian, non-
Description
Riparian, etc.)
(Floodplain depression,
Acreage
Parcel Landowner PIN County Protection
seepage slope, etc.)
Wetland 1
Riparian Non - riverine
Floodplain Depression
0.407
Wetland 2
Riparian Riverine/Non-
Floodplain Depression
6.906
riverine
Wetland 3
Non - riparian
Seepage Slope /Springhead
0.127
Wetland 4
Riparian Non - riverine
Floodplain Depression
0.030
Rockingham
Pg 1274 _
Total
7.47
5.0 SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT
The land required for stewardship of this mitigation project includes portions of the following
parcels. Copies of the recorded conservation easement deeds are included in Appendix B.
Site
Deed
Date
Book and
Acreage
Parcel Landowner PIN County Protection
Deed
Page
protected
Instrument
Signed
Number
Bk 1365
Bradsher Annette A. 795200627891/ Conservation
December
24.26
Rockingham
Pg 1274 _
Parcel Bradsher 795200515608 Easement
30, 2008
acres
1285
All site protection instruments require 60 -day advance notification to the Corps and the State
prior to any action to void, amend, or modify the document. No such action shall take place
unless approved by the State.
5.1 Encumbrances
The Site conservation easement is bisected by a gas pipeline. Two cleared horse trails are
located within the conservation easement and will not generate mitigation credit. In addition, a
large beaver impoundment is located in the northwest corner of the Site; streams (Stream 3)
within this area are completely impounded and will not generate mitigation credit (Figure 4,
Appendix A).
6.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS
Project mitigation assets were originally delineated in January 2009 using Global Positioning
Systems. Field reconnaissance with Global Positioning Systems was conducted in January 2015
to validate perennial and intermittent stream lengths and locations, and the wetland delineation
(Figure 4, Appendix A; Stream Data forms, Appendix C; Wetland Dataforms, Appendix D). The
following tables summarize Site stream reaches and mitigation assets.
All credits will be released upon IRT approval. The project service area will be in compliance
with the EEP In -Lieu Fee Instrument.
Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Project
EEP ID 92812 Page 4

Flint Rock Farm #2, Rockingham County, Cape Fear River Basin, 03030002 Cataloging Unit
EEP Project Number 92812
Mitigation Credits
Non - riparian Riparian Nitrogen Phosphorous
Warm Stream Riparian Wetland Nutrient Nutrient
Wetland Buffer Offset Offset
Type R RE R RE R RE
Totals NA 737 NA 1.47 NA 0.03 100,542 NA NA I
Stream Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Wetland Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Warm Stream
Buffer
Warm Stream
Preservation
(linear feet)
(square feet)
Credit (square feet)
components Mitigation Ratio
(linear feet)
449,522.12
Non- riparian Wetland
Preservation
Impounded or
Non - riverine
63,353.55
Wetland 1 5:1
--
components
Buffer on Only
Buffer <50 feet from
Buffer 50 -100 feet
Buffer >100 feet
Total Stream by
Wetland 3 5:1
--
one or both TOB
from both TOB
from both TOB
--
0.03
One Bank
(5:1)
(5:1)
(5:1)
Reach
(acreage)
(No Credit)
Total WMUs
0.17
Stream 1
33.22
221.17
1660.93
1110.21
3025.53
Stream 2
--
--
--
624.79
624.79
Stream 3
364.09
--
--
--
364.09
Stream 4
--
--
69.17
--
69.17
Total
397.31
221.17
1730.10
1735.00
4083.58
(linear feet)
Total SMUs
0
44.23
346.02
347.00
737 SMUs
Wetland Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Riparian Buffer Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Preservation components
Warm Stream
Buffer
Buffer Receiving
Preservation
(linear feet)
(square feet)
Credit (square feet)
components Mitigation Ratio
Riparian Wetland
449,522.12
Non- riparian Wetland
Rural Non - Subject Streams with 100 -200 foot Buffer from TOB
Riverine
Non - riverine
63,353.55
Wetland 1 5:1
--
0.41
43,018.28
Wetland 2 5:1
0.87
6.04
--
Wetland 3 5:1
--
555,893.95
0.13
Wetland 4 5:1
--
0.03
*The area of mitigation beyond 100 feet from the TOB may comprise no more than 10 percent of the total mitigation area.
Total
0.87
6.48
0.13
(acreage)
Total WMUs
0.17
1.30
0.03
Riparian Buffer Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Preservation components
Mitigation
Buffer
Buffer Receiving
Ratio
(square feet)
Credit (square feet)
Rural Non - Subject Streams with 30 -100 foot Buffer from TOB
5:1
449,522.12
449,522.12
Rural Non - Subject Streams with 100 -200 foot Buffer from TOB
10:1
138,593.60*
63,353.55
Rural Subject Streams with 30 -100 foot Buffer from TOB
10:1
43,018.28
43,018.28
Rural Subject Streams with 100 -200 foot Buffer from TOB
20:1
2,401.47*
--
Total (square feet)
633,535.47
555,893.95
Total Buffer
Mitigation Units
100,542
*The area of mitigation beyond 100 feet from the TOB may comprise no more than 10 percent of the total mitigation area.
Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Project
EEP ID 92812 Page 5

7.0 LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval for close -out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the Site will be transferred
to the NCDENR Division of Natural Resource Planning and Conservation's Stewardship
Program. This party shall be responsible for periodic inspection of the Site to ensure that
restrictions required in the conservation easement or the deed restriction document(s) are
upheld." The NCDENR is currently evaluating the endowment model. Until the evaluation is
complete and any changes resulting from the model are implemented, the long -term management
of this project will be funded annually.
8.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES
Pursuant to Section IV H and Appendix III of the Ecosystem Enhancement Program's In -Lieu
Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources has provided the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District with a formal
commitment to fund projects to satisfy mitigation requirements assumed by EEP. This
commitment provides financial assurance for all mitigation projects implemented by the
program.
9.0 REFERENCES
Griffith, G.E., J.M. Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F.
MacPherson, J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and South
Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
NC Division of Water Resources (2013), Cape Fear River Basin Surface Water Classifications,
online (December 12, 2014). httn: / /Dortal.ncdenr.or2 /web /wa /Ds /csu /classifications. Department
of Environment and Natural Resources, NC Division of Water Resources, Raleigh, NC
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (2004),
Local Watershed Plan Summary, Department
Ecosystem Enhancement Program, Raleigh, NC
Troublesome and Little Troublesome Creeks
of Environment and Natural Resources, NC
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (2009), Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities,
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program,
Raleigh, NC
Schafale, M.P. and Weakley, A. S. (1990), Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina, Third Approximation, NC Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC
Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Project
EEP ID 92812 Page 6

APPENDIX A
FIGURES AND PHOTOGRAPHS
Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Project
EEP ID 92812 Appendices

F
u t
�3" A
P R
tR �.
`r7
M
4
1
I b ? F+
� r4
1�
ic
A" 'fir ?ts;
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
Prepared for: Project:
FLINT ROCK FARM #2
PRESERVATION SITE
'it flem Rockingham Count NC
Axiom Erwronwnial, Inc. &Waoi ement y Y'
I
Legend
Parcels
C3 Conservation Easement Boundary
Title: Drawn by:
KRJ FIGURE
Date:
SITE PROTECTION JAN 2015
INSTRUMENT Scale:
1:3000
Project No.:
14 -018
N
I
0
M
4
1
I b ? F+
� r4
1�
ic
A" 'fir ?ts;
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
Prepared for: Project:
FLINT ROCK FARM #2
PRESERVATION SITE
'it flem Rockingham Count NC
Axiom Erwronwnial, Inc. &Waoi ement y Y'
I
Legend
Parcels
C3 Conservation Easement Boundary
Title: Drawn by:
KRJ FIGURE
Date:
SITE PROTECTION JAN 2015
INSTRUMENT Scale:
1:3000
Project No.:
14 -018

Directions to the Site from Raleigh:
- Take 1 -40 West to exit 140 (University Drive),
- Turn right onto University Drive and travel 1.9 miles,
- Turn left onto Westbrook Avenue and travel 0.6 miles,
- Take a right onto Springwood Avenue followed by an immediate left onto Burke Street,
- Turn left onto Main Street then right onto Wharton Avenue /NC -61 N,
- Follow NC -61 N for 9.7 miles, then turn left onto Osceola - Ossipee Road (NC -150 W),
- Follow NC -150 W for 10.9 miles, then turn right onto N Church Street,
After 4.1 miles, turn left onto US -158 W,
- The Site is on the right after 2.2 miles on Flintrock Trail.
- Site Latitude, Longitude: 36.28208, - 79.82494 (NAD83 /WGS84)
k.
4 •
Copyright:© 2013 Nation' I Gee• • - •hlc;
Society, i -cubed
IV
--
_ I
rr ,.• /"
crock
,�
p y f
'�
f7l \J
158 Is I
rte,:
Q ra"Tm_ d4
CO
d --
�-
pI
:
n
1 _ Gopyrigh.t:© 2013 Nation og
al Geraphic,
Society I -cubed
- i —
d � '
lax.i•Om ErlvrrrpnmE±rlial, Inc.
Prepared for:
a'e -$0-- �-
En�fiaa ement
PROGRAM
r Project:
FLINT ROCK
FARM #2
PRESERVATION
SITE
� fir=-_. •�- . .
Rockingham
` County, NC
Il Title:
VICINITY
MAP
F 1 1• • r _
Drawn by:
KRJ
Date:
�* JAN 2015
4 r Scale:
a °'.y. 1:25000
j (D Project No.:
+BCD _ - 14 -018
= -� FIGURE
v
Copyright:© 201 -3 National Geographic Soc;i1ety, i -cubed

j1 4
J
• ;, �,- �_ 14 Digit HU:`
' 03030002010010 '7
J ,R�
} .I' � i1 �T�n• ii�� �+ - i w7 b�r.+.e4� r . .
°S -4M
r
� a
0 v 4.
i
USGS Topographic Map - Bethany, NC Quad
0 250 500 1,000
1,500 2,000
Feet
Prepared for: Project:
FLINT ROCK FARM #2
PRESERVATION SITE
AO ss stem
a ement
Rockin ham Count NC
9 y'
, , Ems, Im,
f
i
z � �
l
•
Legend
C3 Site Watershed - 0.18 sq mi (100.8 ac)
MConservation Easement Boundary
Title: Drawn by:
KRJ FIGURE
Date:
SITE WATERSHED JAN 2015
Scale: 3
1:5000
Project No.:
14 -018

AK
Axiom ems, Im.
Prepared for: Project: Title: Drawn by:
r�
����
EnCaK e t
KRJ /CLF
FLINT ROCK FARM #2 Date:
PRESERVATION SITE PROJECT ASSETS JAN 2015
Scale:
1:3000
Rockingham County, NC (Project No.:
14 -018
FIGURE
S1

Photo 1. Facing north towards easement at
southern end of Site
Photo 3. At top of Stream 1 illustrating strong
flow and large headcut
Photo 5. Standing on the left bank of Stream
1 facing downstream from easement marker
Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Project
EEP ID 92812
Photo 2. At top of Stream 1 illustrating strong
flow and large beadcut
Photo 4. Facing downstream on Stream 1
showing substrate sorting
Photo 6. Standing on left bank of Stream 1
facing downstream/north towards Site
Appendices

Photo 7. Standing on right bank of Stream 1
facing downstream /north towards Site
Photo 11. Stream 4 facing upstream
Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Project
EEP ID 92812
Photo 8. At crossing in the upstream portion
of Stream 1 facing north/downstream
Photo 10. Bridge on horse trail, which does
not appear to be affecting the stream
Photo 12. Stream 4 facing downstream
Appendices

Photo 13. Wetland 3 facing south
Photo 15.
i,
0
Horse path in easement
Photo 14. Confluence of Stream 4 and Stream
1 facing upstream
Photo 16. Horse path in easement
Photo 17. Horse path in easement
Photo 18. Stream 1, downstream of Wetland 3,
facing upstream
Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Project
EEP ID 92812
Appendices

Photo 19. Facing north towards Wetland 2
Photo 21. Corner of easement facing west
Photo 23. Stream 1 facing downstream
3
i .
Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Project
EEP ID 92812
Photo 20. Forest canopy
Photo 22. Vicinity of previously documented
horse trail, which appears to no longer be
Photo 24
Stream 2 facing upstream
Appendices

Photo 25. Wetland 2 facing north
Photo 27. Northwest corner of the Site facing
south
Photo 29. South edge of beaver impoundment
on Troublesome Creek facing north
Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Project
EEP ID 92812
Photo 26. Bottom of Stream 2 facing
upstream /west
Photo 28. Western side of easement boundary
facing east towards Wetland 2
Photo 30. South edge of beaver impoundment
on Troublesome Creek facing west
Appendices

Photo 31. South edge of beaver impoundment
on Troublesome Creek facing northeast
Photo 33. View from southwest edge of
beaver impoundment facing east
Photo 35. Beaver dam in Troublesome Creek
Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Project
EEP ID 92812
Photo 32. View from southwest edge of
beaver impoundment facing northeast
Photo 34. Beaver impoundment on
Troublesome Creek facing east
Photo 36. Beaver dam in Troublesome Creek
Appendices

Photo 37. Beaver dam in Troublesome Creek
i
-
�;h F�1
2
Photo 39. Easement boundary
Photo 38. Troublesome Creek beaver
impoundment, taken from dam
Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Project
EEP ID 92812 Appendices

APPENDIX B
SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENTS
Recorded Conservation Easement
Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Project
EEP ID 92812 Appendices

m
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
FILED
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NC
REBECCA B. CIPRIANI
REGISTER OF DEEDS
December 30, 2008 11:03:35 AM
DEED BOOK 1365
PAGE 1274 - 1285
INSTRUMENT # 20080014854
RECORDING: $45.00
PROBATE: $2.00
EXCISE TAX: $248.00
NONSTAND: MULTIPLE FEE:
ASIMPSON
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
SPO File Number 079 -ZD
Prepared by: Office of the Attorney General
Property Control Section
Return to: NC Department of Administration
State Property Office
1321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1321
Revenue Stamps: $248.00
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT DEED, pursuant to the provisions of N.C.
General Statutes Chapter 121, Article 4 and made this _) day of (DeC- 2►rri�Qr ,
2008, by Annette A. Bradsher and husband Jay W. Lankiford, ( "Grantor "), whose mailing
address is 221 Flint Rock Trail, Reidsville, NC 27320, to the State of North Carolina,
( "Grantee "), whose mailing address is State of North Carolina, Department of Administration,
State Property Office, 1321 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1321. The designations
Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns,
and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143 -214.8 et se . the State
of North Carolina has established the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (formerly known as the
Wetlands Restoration Program) within the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
for the purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring, enhancing, creating and preserving wetland
and riparian resources that contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood
prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; and
WHEREAS, The State of North Carolina is qualified to be the Grantee of a Conservation
Easement pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121 -35; and
WHEREAS, the Ecosystem Enhancement Program. in the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources has approved acceptance of this instrument; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina
Department of Transportation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
District entered into a Memorandum of Agreement, (MOA.) duly executed by all parties in

Greensboro, NC on July 22, 2003. This MOA recognizes that the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program is to provide for compensatory mitigation by effective protection of the land, water and
natural resources of the State by restoring, enhancing and preserving ecosystem functions; and
WHEREAS, the acceptance of this instrument for and on behalf of the State of North
Carolina was granted to the Department of Administration by resolution as approved by the
Governor and Council of State adopted at a meeting held in the City of Raleigh, North Carolina,
on the 8t' day of February 2000; and
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying, and being
in New Bethel Township, Rockingham County, North Carolina (the "Property"), and being
more particularly described as that certain parcel of land containing approximately 50.00 +/-
acres in Parcel 1 and 189.96 +/- acres in Parcel 2 and being conveyed to the Grantor by deed as
recorded in Deed Book 1319 at Page 1283 as well as Deed Book 421, Page 570, respectfully,
of the Rockingham County Registry, North Carolina; and
WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement over the herein
described areas of the Property, thereby restricting and limiting the use of the included areas of
the Property to the terms and conditions and purposes hereinafter set forth, and Grantee is willing
to accept such Conservation Easement. This Conservation Easement shall be for the protection
and benefit of the waters of Troublesome Creek Flint Rock Farms #2.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and
restrictions hereinafter set forth, Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably hereby grants and
conveys unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity, a Conservation
Easement of the nature and character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over a described area
of the Property, referred to hereafter as the "Easement Area ", for the benefit of the people of
North Carolina, and being all of the tract of land as identified as Tracts 1, 2, and 3 as shown on a
plat of survey entitled "Conservation Easement Survey for the State of North Carolina
Ecosystem Enhancement Program SPO File No. 079 -ZD NC EEP Project No. 92812
Project Name: Flint Rock Farms" dated November 14, 2008, certified by Douglas R.
Yarbrough PLS L -3395, and recorded in Map Book 065„ Page 025, Rockingham County
Registry. Tracts 1, 2, and 3 being more particularly described in the attached Exhibit A:
[PLEASE SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A]
The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain, restore, enhance, create and
preserve wetland and/or riparian resources in the Easement Area that contribute to the protection
and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat,
and recreational opportunities; to maintain permanently the Easement Area in its natural
condition, consistent with these purposes; and to prevent any use of the Easement Area that will
significantly impair or interfere with these purposes. To achieve these purposes, the following
conditions and restrictions are set forth:
I. DURATION OF EASEMENT
Pursuant to law, including the above referenced statutes, this Conservation Easement
shall be perpetual and it shall run with, and be a continuing restriction upon the use of, the
2

Property, and it shall be enforceable by the Grantee against the Grantor and against Grantor's
heirs, successors and assigns, personal representatives, agents, lessees, and licensees.
H. GRANTOR RESERVED USES AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITES
The Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that would impair
or interfere with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Unless expressly reserved as a
compatible use herein, any activity in, or use of, the Easement Area by the Grantor is prohibited
as inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Any rights not expressly
reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the Grantee. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, the following specific uses are prohibited, restricted, or reserved as
indicated:
A. Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the right to undeveloped
recreational uses, including hiking, bird watching, hunting, and fishing, and access to the
Easement Area for the purposes thereof. Usage of motorized vehicles in the Easement Area is
prohibited, except as they are used exclusively for management, maintenance, or stewardship
purposes, and on existing trails, paths or roads.
B. Educational Uses. The Grantor reserves the right to engage in and permit others
to engage in educational uses in the Easement Area not inconsistent with this Conservation
Easement, and the right of access to the Easement Area for such purposes including organized
educational activities such as site visits and observations. Educational uses of the property shall
not alter vegetation, hydrology or topography of the site.
C. Vegetative Cutting. Except as related to the removal of non - native plants,
diseased or damaged trees, and vegetation that obstructs, destabilizes or renders unsafe the
Easement Area to persons or natural habitat, all cutting,, removal, mowing, harming, or
destruction of any trees and vegetation in the Easement Area is prohibited.
D. Industrial, Residential and Commercial Uses. All are prohibited in the
Easement Area.
E. Agricultural Use. All agricultural uses within the Easement Area including any
use for cropland, waste lagoons, or pastureland are prohibited.
F. New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home, antenna,
utility pole, tower, or other structure constructed or placed in the Easement Area.
G. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails, walkways, or
paving in the Easement Area. Existing roads or trails located in the Easement Area may be
maintained by Grantor in order to minimize runoff, sedimentation and for access to the interior
of the Property for management, maintenance, stewardship purposes, or undeveloped
recreational and educational uses of the Easement Area. Existing roads, trails or paths may be
maintained with loose gravel or permanent vegetation to stabilize or cover the surfaces.
H. Signs. No signs shall be permitted in the Easement Area except interpretive signs
describing restoration activities and the conservation values of the Easement Area, signs
3

identifying the owner of the Property and the holder of the Conservation Easement, signs giving
directions, or signs prescribing rules and regulations for the use of the Easement Area may be
allowed.
I. Dumping or Storing. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances or machinery, or other material in the Easement Area is
prohibited.
J. Grading, Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging. There shall be no grading,
filling, excavation, dredging, mining, or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat,
minerals, or other materials.
K. Water Quality and Drainage Patterns. There shall be no diking, draining,
dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or diverting, causing, allowing or
permitting the diversion of surface or underground water. No altering or tampering with water
control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced, or created
drainage patterns. All removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into waters, springs, seeps,
or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited. In the event of an emergency
interruption or shortage of all other water sources, water from within the Easement Area may
temporarily be used for good cause shown as needed for the survival of livestock and agricultural
production.
L. Subdivision and Conveyance. Grantor voluntarily agrees that no subdivision,
partitioning, or dividing of the underlying fee that is subject to this Easement is allowed. Unless
agreed to by the Grantee in writing, any future conveyance of the underlying fee for the
Easement Area and the rights as conveyed herein shall be as a single block of property. Any
future transfer of the fee simple shall be subject to this Conservation Easement. Any transfer of
the fee is subject to the Grantee's right of unlimited and repeated ingress and egress over and
across the Property to the Easement Area for the purposes set :forth herein.
M. Development Rights. All development rights are removed from the Easement
Area and shall not be transferred.
N. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or
impairment of the natural features of the Easement Area or any intentional introduction of non-
native plants, trees and/or animal species by Grantor is prohibited.
The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good cause
shown, provided that any such request is consistent with the purposes of this Conservation
Easement. The Grantor shall not vary from the above restrictions without first obtaining written
approval from the N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program, whose mailing address is 1652 Mail
Services Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652.
III. GRANTEE RESERVED USES
A. Ingress, Egress, and Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents,
successors and assigns, receive the perpetual right of unlimited and repeated ingress and egress
to the Easement Area over the Property at reasonable times to undertake any activities to restore,
4

manage, maintain, enhance, and monitor the wetland and riparian resources of the Easement
Area, in accordance with restoration activities or a long -term management plan. Unless
otherwise specifically set forth in this Conservation Easement, the rights granted herein do not
include or establish for the public any access rights.
B. Restoration Activities. These activities include planting of trees, shrubs and
herbaceous vegetation, installation of monitoring wells, utilization of heavy equipment to grade,
fill, and prepare the soil, modification of the hydrology of the site, and installation of natural and
manmade materials as needed to direct in- stream, above ground, and subterraneous water flow.
IV. ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. Enforcement. To accomplish the purposes of this Conservation Easement,
Grantee is allowed to prevent any activity within the Easement Area that is inconsistent with the
purposes of this Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the Easement
Area that may have been damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this
Conservation Easement by Grantor, their successors or assigns, that comes to the attention of the
Grantee, the Grantee shall, except as provided below, notify the Grantor, their successors or
assigns in writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have ninety (90) days after receipt of such
notice to correct the conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains uncured after
ninety (90) days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by appropriate legal
proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief. The Grantee shall also have the
power and authority, consistent with its statutory authority: (a) to prevent any impairment of the
Easement Area by acts which may be unlawful or in violation of this Conservation Easement; (b)
to otherwise preserve or protect its interest in the Property; or (c) to seek damages from any
appropriate person or entity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate
right, without notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate
relief if the breach of the term of this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or
otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation Easement. The
Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such circumstarices damage to the Grantee would
be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate. The rights and remedies of the Grantee
provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies
available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement.
B. Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, have
the right, with reasonable notice, to enter the Easement Area over the Property at reasonable
times for the purpose of inspection to determine whether the Grantor, their successors or assigns
are complying with the terms, conditions and restrictions of this Conservation Easement.
C. Acts Beyond Grantor's Control. Nothing contained in this Conservation
Easement shall be construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor, their
successors or assigns, for any injury or change in the Easement Area caused by third parties,
resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control, including, without limitation, fire, flood,
storm, and earth movement, or from any prudent action taken in good faith by the Grantor under
emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, damage to property
or harm to the Property resulting from such causes.
5

D. Costs of Enforcement. Beyond regular and typical monitoring, any costs
incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this Conservation Easement against Grantor, their
successors or assigns, including, without limitation, any costs of restoration necessitated by
Grantor's acts or omissions in violation of the terms of this Conservation Easement, shall be
borne by Grantor.
No Waiver. Enforcement of this Easement shall be at the discretion of the Grantee and any
forbearance, delay or omission by Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any
breach of any term set forth herein shall not be construed to be a waiver by Grantee.
V. MISCELLANEOUS
A. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the
Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or
agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be invalid, the
remainder of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, and the application of such provision
to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not be
affected thereby.
B. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested
to the parties at their addresses shown above or to other address(es) as either party establishes in
writing upon notification to the other.
C. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address and any party to
whom the Property or any part thereof is to be transferred at or prior to the time said transfer is
made. Grantor further agrees to make any subsequent lease, deed, or other legal instrument by
which any interest in the Property is conveyed subject to the Conservation Easement herein
created.
D. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall
survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Property or any portion thereof.
E. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in writing ;signed by all
parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the qualification of this
Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable laws, and is consistent
with the purposes of the Conservation Easement.
F. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation Easement
are in gross and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees,
that in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the
interest will be a qualified holder under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121 -34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the
Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the
transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in
perpetuity the conservation purposes described in this document.
6

VI. QUIET ENJOYMENT
Grantor reserves all remaining rights accruing from ownership of the Property, including
the right to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in only those uses of the Easement
Area that are expressly reserved herein, not prohibited or restricted herein, and are not
inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, the Grantor expressly reserves to the Grantor, and the Grantor's invitees and
licensees, the right of access to the Easement Area, and the right of quiet enjoyment of the
Easement Area.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto the State of
North Carolina for the aforesaid purposes.
AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of said _premises in fee and has the right to
convey the permanent Conservation Easement herein granted; that the same are free from
encumbrances and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against the claims of all
persons whomsoever.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day
and year first above written.
( 9 SEAL
Annette A. Bradsher
.f
r (� (SEAL)
Jay W Lankford

NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
I, a Notary Public in and for the County and State
aforesaid, do hereby certify that kT\YW M- ?JMd`dfiCL #' Grantor, personally appeared
before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
.j_ XtKIk " N. fbr 6mr
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the
day of VX,C.PMVXX- , 200$.
' I
My commission expires: U l 1-f loq
L To
���p7AR1• �: _
otary Public o PU81.�G = z;
Ln

NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF RoCKW it R M
I, Sots %R L- MOV361 , a Notary Public in and for the County and State
aforesaid, do hereby certify that 3Nq VJ. kMKF V-0 , Grantor, personally appeared
before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the
day of , 200_
1
My commission expires:
10 In loci
tAOTgRj-

EXHis %T A
Tract 1
Beginning at an existing rebar in the line of Annette A. Bradsher, said beginning being
NO3 °19'55 "E 3825.90' from the centerline intersection of NC Highway 158 and Flint
Rock Trail, running thence with the line of Annette A. Bradsher N04 °25'36 "E 351.05' to
an existing iron pipe; thence continuing with Annette A. Bradsher N04 °25'36 "E 37.32' to
a point in the centerline of Troublesome Creek; thence down the centerline of
Troublesome Creek the following:
S48 048'08 "E 34.74' to a point
S74 023'56 "E 37.88' to a point
S86 °26' 16 "E 54.81' to a point
N70 023'45 "E 35.54' to a point
S83 035'25 "E 24.01' to a point
S80 031'40 "E 53.97' to a point in the center of
Troublesome Creek and on the western right of way of the Plantation Pipe Line Company
30' right of way; thence crossing the property of Annette A. Bradsher and along the said
western right of way of the pipe line the following:
S03 013'06 "E 8.44' to a new rebar and cap set
S03 013'06 "E 167.00' 'to a new rebar and cap set
Thence leaving pipe line right of way and continuing across the property of Annette A.
Bradsher the following:
S78 037'39 "W 55.48' 'to a new rebar and cap set
S52 °16'57 "W 269.70' to the point and place of
beginning and containing 1.45 acres more or less.
Tract 2
Beginning at a new rebar and cap set in the property of Annette A. Bradsher and on the
eastern right of way of the Plantation Pipe Line Company 30' right of way, said
beginning being NI 1'07'43"E 2410.90' from the centerline intersection of NC Highway
158 and Flint Rock Trail, running thence across the property of Annette A. Bradsher and
along the eastern right of way of Plantation Pipe Line Company 30' right of way the
following:
N05 016'46 "E ..
200.00'
N05 016'46 "E
200.00'
N05 016'46 "E
175.00'
N05 016'46 "E
165.00'
to a new rebar and cap set
to a new rebar and cap set
to a new rebar and cap set
to a new rebar and cap set
P. 1 /3

NO3 039'42 "E
143.00'
to a new rebar and cap set
NO3 039'42 "E
143.07'
to a new rebar and cap set
N01 014'42 "W
159.62'
to a new rebar and cap set
NO3 041'40 "W
175.01'
to a new rebar and cap set
NO3 041'40 "W
173.62'
to a new rebar and cap set
NO3 013'06 "W
135.02'
to a new rebar and cap set
NO3 013'06 "W
114.98'
to a new rebar and cap set
NO3 013'06 "W
20.54'
to a point in the centerline of
Troublesome Creek; thence with
the center of Troublesome Creek the following:
S81 025'57 "E
38.07'
to a point
N8103 1'26"E
114.18'
to a point
S87 °35'35 "E
132.88'
to a point
S88 052'01 "E
174.42'
to a point
S87 °13'22 "E
79.26'
to a point
N89 056'59 "E
132.56'
to a point
S89 049'22 "E
62.23'
to a point
N83041'1 l"E
12.33'
to a point in the centerline of
Troublesome Creek and a corner
with John Grove Cummings; thence with John Grove
Cummings the following:
S01 °49' 18 "W
20.67'
to a new rebar and cap set
S01049' 18"W
162.98'
to a new rebar and cap set
S01 °49' 18 "W
187.02'
to a new rebar and cap set in the line
of John Grove Cummings, said new rebar and cap being NO1 °49'18 "E 179.38' fi-om an
existing iron pin in the line of John Grove Cummings; running thence across the property
of Annette A. Bradsher the following:
S74 °12'38 "W
50.25'
to a new rebar and cap set
S18 °15'31 "W
58.82'
to a new rebar and cap set
S56 037'54 "W
88.64'
to a new rebar and cap set
N56 049'04 "W
78.32'
to a new rebar and cap set
S33 019'22 "W
97.32'
to a new rebar and cap set
S80 °42' 12 "W
92.80'
to a new rebar and cap set
S77 057'00 "W
186.50'
to a new rebar and cap set
S05 010150 11W
104.93'
to a new rebar and cap set
S 15 °20'47 "E
159.46'
to a new rebar and cap set
S07 037'05 "E
271.97'
to a new rebar and cap set
S 14 °50'24 "E
176.42'
to a new rebar and cap set
S03 035'50 "W
146.75'
to a new rebar and cap set
S290'24'47 "E
125.63'
to a new rebar and cap set
S25 059'33 "W
100.63
to a new rebar and cap set
S12 °37'44 "W
151.71'
to a new rebar and cap set
S01 057'48 "W
211.84'
to a new rebar and cap set
S 14 026'29 "W
179.49'
to a new rebar and cap set
N51 057'48 "W
135.37'
to a new rebar and cap set
N43 048'01 "W
50.29'
to a new rebar and cap set
N20 050'38 "W
78.33'
to a new rebar and cap set
N46 °13' 15 "W
60.86'
to a new rebar and cap set
2/3

N28 °24' 14 "W 142.00' to the point and place of beginning
and containing 17.80 acres more or less.
Tract 3
Beginning at a new rebar and cap set in the property of Annette A. Bradsher and on the
eastern right of way of the Plantation Pipe Line Company 30' right of way, said
beginning being N31'59'14"E 1234.43' from the centerline intersection of NC Highway
158 and Flint Rock Trail, running thence across the property of Annette A. Bradsher the
following:
NO2 °30' 14 "E
N05 033'27 "W
N29 °41' 56 "W
N26 047'47 "W
N14 019'23 "W
N 19 °27' 09 "W
N09 022'05 "E
N21 °08' 5 8 "E
N00 °03' 09 "E
N77 °51' 00"E
S49 008'59 "E
S49 036'24 "E
S05 008'00 "E
SO4 055'03 "E
S05 °14' 12 "E
SO4 000'35 "E
S02 001'27 "E
S22 022'37 "W
126.00'
134.12'
142.16'
124.44'
141.50'
105.97'
85.51'
162.48'
86.05'
48.35'
81.93'
142.46'
209.49'
170.53'
106.38'
119.51'
179.37'
135.11'
S84 016'35 "W 92.84'
beginning and containing 5.01 acres more or less.
to a new rebar and cap set
to a new rebar and cap set
to a new rebar and cap set
to a new rebar and cap set
to a new rebar and cap set
to a new rebar and cap set
to a new rebar and cap set
to a new rebar and cap set
to a new rebar and cap set
to a new rebar and cap set
to a new rebar and cap set
to a new rebar and cap set
to a new rebar and cap set
to a new rebar and cap set
to a new rebar and cap set
to a new rebar and cap set
to a new rebar and cap set
to a new rebar and cap set
to the point and place of
The preceding three conservation easement tracts were surveyed by Landmark
Surveying, Inc. entitled "Final Plat, Conservation Easement Survey, For the State of
North Carolina, Ecosystem Enhancement Program, SPO File No. 079 -ZD NC EEP
Project No. 92812, Project Name: Flint Rock Farms, Property of, Annette A. Bradsher,
and Husband, Jay W. Lankford" dated November 13, 2008 and recorded in the
Rockingham County Register of Deeds in Plat Book 65 Page 25.
11/14/2008
Doutgla . Yarbr gh, P -3395 Date
.•` -1 VN CAR
,...•.......... o�
2© Q Qo��sso� , %. ; Vol
3
-•;-9
p = L -3395 ' C7
• i R YAR �•.

APPENDIX C
STREAM FORMS
Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Project
EEP ID 92812 Appendices

cam" k %15
PSACE Alba#_ - DWQ #_ _- - _ -.- Site # 5'( tindicate on altached map)
J.' t t , STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET �
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: l
1. Applicant's name: -010EE P 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: __1�_i�a'V t� 1. "t'une of evaluation: f �Gp
5. Name of stream: StM OQSi' Ur` 6. River basin: �P<
7. Approximate drainage area:-' 19, [tG•sS 8. Stream order: �
9. Lenolh of reach evaluated: 3ai 10. county: i�-EIC f'(twS a Ps,
11. Site coordinates (if known): 36,- `63�,- _ 12. Subdivision name (if any):
74.494, y64f
13. Location of reach under evaluation i note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying strearttts) location):
14. Pit1pused channel work (if any): wV rtic
15. Recent weather conditions: V-V _C. iy
16. Site conditions at time of visit: t/—t C U V C sec
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section [0 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters ,Outstanding Resource Waters NI.Itrient Sensitive Waters , rs Water Supply Watershed 'J.L (I - IV )
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel a r;)ear on USES qv td map? YES tl 20, Does chanttc l ppear on USf)A 'inif Survey'? YES 'tJ
21. Estimated watershed land use- 10 % Residential % Commercial ®tin Industrial 40% Agricultural
�a % F-,trested IN, Cleared / Lagged % tither t )
22. Bankfull width: - G 23. Rani: height (from bed to top of bank): 5 --77
2.3. Channel slope down center of stream: __flat (0 to 29H Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to lO%) __Steep ( >Ita "r )
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _&Occasionai bends — Frequent meander __Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecum.gion based on
la?%:ariiqt, terrain. vegetation. stream classification, ctc- livery charactei'i.titit: must be scored using the sarmc ecoregion. Assign pot as it
each characteristic within the range shown tier the ecoregion. Page 3 Provides a brief description of how to review the characteristic.,
identified in the worksheet_ Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
he evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
three are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream mar
he divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total scare assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and too, with a score rnf 100 representing a stream of the highest duality.
Total Store (from reverse):_ %P Comments
L• aluator's Signature t Bate ~ (! s
This channel evaluation form is intended to are used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
r;atbering the data required by (lie United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminart assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting front the completion of this form is subject to USAGE approx'at and dots not imply a
porticular mitigation ratio or requirement. I sin ,uhl-I t .hat- - %cr4li,n Ot„'t)3 "I u i ,munent, hlr.isc :all 919-,S7()-844I v ?r

STREANI QUALITY ASSESSI I ENT NVO urro-mL� L.T
,total 11t)inIN Possible 1 (10 1 Oc L 100
enter on III-SL
UL
65'
I ECOI'I,:(;I()N
POINTRANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
---presence (if no %v I 1wrsktent pools in stream
tno flow or saturation = o-, Ntrom,, How = may Isom s)
'
coastal -
0-5'
Picilmont
I Mountain
0-5
SuMu.
Evidence of pas t human alteration
0-4,
0-5
0-5
ive alteration = 0: nt, Atcr:ttion max
Ripari. 111 Zolle
I
(no huffer� 0 . �111 %Jd I I'le I' = max p ITIL
4
I Evidence of nu en o, chemical discharges
tcxtensivc disch.m-e% = 0: no discharges - mr, [I .....
discharge
(1-4
0-4
5
insl discharge = O vc1linds. ;71,1\ points)
—,CLPL- 1 —17--
--Presence -Ice"t f1l)(HIPlaill
of adi.
0-4
0 - 4
0-2
fit) Iloodplain = 0: extensive ilkiojp1.:iin = max point
f) .- -41
0-2
Entrenchment / ►1(m)(l►lain '-Icc"s
idooply entrench ,-d = 0: frequent floodinf! = max PO luts)
Presence (if adjaccia wetlands
ds kit-c at�,jcetn W-cfhiflds Max POint,)
4
0 -4
(.'Imonel sinuoq►ty
0 -
(extensi%c, chaimclizaiii in 0 miturat inc.indcr _ 13mxy,till( 1
St-din►vat input
-) Nedinient = mx P, IMLO
0; little or nor
-3
Size & diversify of channel bed sabstraie
0-5 1,3
0-4
1
tfinc, hkinitw-onou% - o; 1-troo. 4iiv r sizes - nmx potrit-,',
1.1"N idence of channel inc
13
(deroly im:i�cd = 0: -.,-'-"2'x P 1111
Prue 11.•e of major bank failures
ese (sovere croiwn = 0: jj�o erosion, st;ible b.tnk--; max points)
0 -- i
0 5
11 - 3
0 t
ROL)t depth and density on INInkS
0-5
14
(no Visible roots �- 0: dclbi-, l'oOt's throm--h --jIl')XV oints)
Impact [IV agriculture, livestock. or timber production
(substmltiaf impact no evidence =
0-5
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple -pool complexes
(no, rifflc.,�/ricplcs orpools = 0; Well-deNcloped - ninx polints)
0-3
0-
0-6
11.1hitat complexitA
0 -G
0-6
0-0 <51
i 71
(little or ntl 1111110a; - 0, 1:c(plent. varlc-d 11,11him-1, P,),IX pton(s)
---
f) - --1
0-5
5,
Canopy coverage over streambed
tno simcling, V�1-,Ctm-,on mu-tls ints)
NA*
0--4
SLIbstrate embuddedoess
0-4 3
Ill I
oJecoly embedded = 0; loosc,:
Presence of we stream invertebrates t p a-- 4ji
0 —i
0-5
Ci
no c,,,idcnce 0: common. numerous 1\1 Wit.\ ponits!_
Presence of amphibians
L_ _
0-4
()-4
(fit) evidence: = 0-, k:omnjon. nimicrous ttype, fnat Points)
_4
12
Presence of fish
0-4
0 -4
0 - 4
-_
uvidente= 0: c5n-1f, lon, numerous types = ni.Lx oints t
Evidetice of wildlife use
j110 Cvidence = 0. Almid'itil evidence= nlax 2!2jjAjZ)
,total 11t)inIN Possible 1 (10 1 Oc L 100
enter on III-SL
UL
65'

NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 4 )) 444 -d v (k
Date: I I - �- ' � 0 Project/Site: 4A 140
Evaluator: h�l County: ►` mG�(twS�ah
Total Points: Stream Determination (cir
Stream is at least intermittent '31 Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
if ? 19 or perennial if >_ 30"
s f 2G _0 `6 5kr•,. .', 1
Latitude: 3(_ as3wa
Longitude: a�Y(v
Other &? Ik([(�,�
e.g. Quad Name:
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
41
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= ` )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Str ng
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
(
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
©->
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
1
©
3
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
d
2
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
2
(3,
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
(3)
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
(0
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
_9
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1 j
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5�
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yesr
C. Biology (Subtotal= S 1
---------
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
(3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
v
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 LxaeL
=-C
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
41

LUSACE AID#
DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
nS AIM
11 no 1 11
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET if
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: We 2. Evaluator's name: -
3. Date of evaluation:
/n� 1—"f - M 4. Time of evaluation: _
5. Name of stream: r Ik A FLVG h (7, r`^ k -.- -; b 6. River basin: CkN e-
4
7. Approximate drainage area: ac ­e7 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: ON C) 10. County: C 6 1 *tJ
11. Site coordinates (if known): • �1CG 17 1 Z `� _` I `Ct- 12. Subdivision name (if any): '
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
v✓ a w{
1-04— Awely qq twfrS
Co 10 C
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters 6u-trient Sensitive W Water Supply Watershed ]X (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES -C 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: !D% Residential % Commercial % Industrial 3 Vlo Agricultural
66% Forested /o Cleared / Logged % Other ( 1
22. Bankfull width: y i 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): a — 6
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends k Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 7� Comments:
Evaluator's Signature K (,_ Date I v; — 17
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919 - 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max
points)L
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
no discharge = 0; s rings, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max
points)L
L
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 - 4
0-2
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplain access
7
0-5
0-4
0-2
p"
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
a
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
1 I
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
3
y+
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max poi nts
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 — 5
0-5
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
Pa
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
H
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
Z
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max
points)
✓
16
Presence of riffle- pool/ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
F
17
Habitat
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 — 6
0-6
or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
Q18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
x
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max p oints
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
Y
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
Q
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0 - 4
0-4
O
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
r23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
a
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)_
5�
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Ati�if w 4 kll
Date: 1- �- I Project/Site:h, -_+ A,, (, �I,
Evaluator: )(I U County:C(,`���
Total Points: Stream Determination (cir
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral Intermitten Pe�ennia
if ? 19 or perennial if 2:30*
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 1' )
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active /relict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =2 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
Absent
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
A
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0
14. Leaf litter 1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0
C. Biology (Subtotal = G 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed V
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed V
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0
22. Fish 0
23. Crayfish 0
24. Amphibians 0
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
41
Weak
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
1
L�>
9
0.5
Latitude:
Longitude: 7�r g aSYy
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
Moderate
2
2
2
2
2
1
Yes = 3
2
2
0.5
1
d
Yor=
2 1
2 1
1 2
1 2
0.5 1
0.5 1
0.5 1
0.5 1
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
Strong
3
K
3
3
3
3
3
1.5
C9
V
3
0
1.5
1.5
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
no STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: J
1. Applicant's name: !1 ( & 2. Evaluator's name: {' +` Iw% G'' /` 10 wt
3. Date of evaluation: i 1q,— / 5- 4. Time of evaluation: - 3 p
5. Name of stream: l a.l -I,0 ry q41 '1 6. River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area: 15 ��e5 8. Stream order:L
9. Length of reach evaluated: d 10. County: /LO' C ! t 1 K'tj W,(4-7
11. Site coordinates (if known): 4� 'WW , 71 �.3(fiyg 12. Subdivision name (if any): `
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: „iv k - 'c IiC. C
16. Site conditions at time of visit: 010 5r4-'-t . Inset -4
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters L Nutrient Sensitive Waters y— Water Supply Watershed H -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (9 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: � d %Residential % Commercial % Industrial 57C% Agricultural
C[0% Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other (
22. Bankfull width: V 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep ( >10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. -Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): C9 7 Comments: P —r ✓10 14 t/i 6 �. x .�t d c. 1(—t to ,
Evaluator's Signature A k Date � ` )—r 17✓
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
0
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0— 6
0— 4
0— 5
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max poi nts
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
Uno
discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0— 4
0— 4
0— 2
y
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)
x
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0— 5
0— 4
0— 2
a
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
r
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
3
dee 1 incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 — 5
0-5
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
d
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 4
0-5
E�
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
-
I S
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 — 4
0-5
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle - pool /ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
3
no riffl s/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats =max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 — 5
0-5
�"'
x
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
3
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
Q
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0 — 4
0-4
%'�
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max points)
( J
r23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
7
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
0

NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Its �t 1
Date: l- �0 �.c Project/Site: VtvGh
Evaluator: �)P�lw� ✓ ✓�� County: 07
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one)
Stream is at least intermittent y Ephemeral Intermittent ren ial
if ? 19 or perennial if ? 30` l
/7
�3)
A. Geomorpholoqy (Subtotal= 1
Absent
Weak
1a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
1
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
9. Grade control
0
0.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
11. Second or greater order channel Aldo =
a artificial ditches are not rated; see di cussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = �)
12. Presence of Baseflow 0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0
14. Leaf litter 1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0
C. Biology (Subtotal = fo )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
21. Aquatic Mollusks I 0
22. Fish 0
23. Crayfish 0
24. Amphibians 0
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
`perennial streams may also be identified using otper methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: ,A -c l d pmt r ric ( / `2 ket"`
Sketch:
41
Wa -k l 44 -
Latitude: 3�_ ';.aJ
Longitude: 1 -l-
Other befc'&"
e.g. Quad Name:
Moderate Strong
2
�3)
3
0
3
l2,
3
2
2
3
0
3
2
3
1.5
1 1.5
Yes = 3
1 2 G
1 di 3
0.5 0
0.5 1.5
0.5 1.5
t`Yes
2 1 0
2 1 0 1
1 2 3
1 2 3
0.5 1 1.5
0.5 1 1.5
0.5 1 1.5
0.5 1 1.5
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other =4

l�
utiACE A11.)# liWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
E r m t STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
DProvide the following information for the stream reach under, .,,�.., ., ...::
I. Applicant's na N me- 6 Fi p 2. Evaluator's name Joe -
3. Date of evaluation: �- �� l5 d. Time of evaluation:
S. Name of stream: e veep ri N b. River basin: +
_ 4,W
7. Approximate drainage area: Akfts, 8. Stream order. O
2scfc,t oat- w-
9. Leneth of reach evaluated: 10. County.- �+� ,
/�.cr,,��1V 12. Subdivision name (if an) �-^
11. Site ccx,rdinntes (if known):�� =���� �,— ___ -1' I6 y =
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby road&, and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): VA-Oa 0
15. Recent weather conditions:_ (�'(% i L-rf-
16. Site conditions at time of visit: T to C .e d! -op3 I
17. Identity any special waterway classiftc:ations known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters — Essential Fisheries habitat
_ —Trout Waters _Outstanding Resnurco; Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters XWater Supply Watershed I -IV
18. Is there: a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point'? YES 69 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel ap )ear on LISGS quid map? YES (NO,.-' 20. Does chanth 1 appear on USDA Soil Survey'? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use- %. Residential _Il Commercial _rib Industrial % Agcvultur.tl
0% Forested v,`F> Cleared / Lagged _% Other t )
22. Bankfull width: 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
2-!. Channel slope clown center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to lam) _Moderate (� to lOr%el _Steep (> 10`s i
25. Channel sinuosity: XStraighi ­Occasional bends Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): 8rein by determining the most appropriate ccoregion based on
location_ terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characreri.uc roust be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the ranee shown fur the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet- Scores should reflect in overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
he evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g.. the stream flows From a posture into a forest). the stream niav
he divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to it stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with :t score of 100. ter.. �.+_..ih� a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 66 Comments:
!rr ✓t�rrtly �f& -rw,ey -t- -oq , -,F-4I ctiP osess.�.,.L
Evaluator's Signature Date
Th6 channel evaluation form is intended to he used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the united States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total sc•ure resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular nritipiliun ratio or requirement. F,,t ni ,, i6wc! t�, , h:ln „e - Version 00 /03. To Conunew, 1,lcasc tall 914-S70-844 1 x 'h

STREAPM QUALITY ASSESSMENT NVOR K,-mr-r, j
T017AL -SCORE enter on first, page)
66
LA 1A KA L I Eli 1,7) 1 1 k-
Coastal
PiAmont
pl-escocc if flow / persistent pools in strv;im
into tlt)%v kir satia'ation = O'istn)'M HOW = "lax 110111k) it —
4
— Evidence of past butuant alteration
0-6
0-5 0-5
H-2
(extensive alieration = 0: lit) alternion ma 4111s)
- Riparian zom
(no � 0
(nobtilfcr�().- L
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical di-schar�gvs
0--
0-4
0
(extensive dkchat-!--e-s - D: no discharges max points')
'GromidN%ater discharge
0-4
5
dischalLe 0; WC[Lind". et,:. I LN
0, 71;
JL u, illw`
Presence of floollplaill
no lot*p Lkil 0: extcn., i t e i 1, ioki pla in = maX 1!!Irlts)
0 — i
Entrenchment ;1loodpLiiij arcess
4
D,
((feet)j�' 1:1111'elil,'110d = 4 1� N-0(11111lt flOOLlinj! � max point-,;)
C
Pr"Clice ofadjaccot wMands
0 - 4
a p
U. wotlnds � max dints)
0-5
1) 4
1
Channel sitillosi IV
ti
9
jcxjz.-nsj%t, -11a ,tic lijat iim - 0; natural nic.indcr
Sudillivilt input
little or no s khment - max io—iots-)-
10
Size & dicer silty of channel bed substrate
= 0_I it c. diverseAzos = max-p011its
_(finelw-w!,enOus
Lvid.1ce of c1l;jimel incision or wideiiiij.,
0 --5
1
0: bcd & banks � max points)
-3
pt-ese,),--c of major bank- failures
' - s
0: stable ban!
i
0
(sovere crosion = lit) ) erosion,
Itoot dvpth atid dvmsity on banks
0-3
0-4
(lit) ciNible roots - 0; don.- 1't-B throtiolimn - max poin(s)
Impact by agrictilhire. Iii L,,Ntoch. or timber production
0-4
0-5 1 3
15
f,�jlj)stjlljtial impact =(), no eN itlence = Ill,kX Polills)
-- _-
0-5
0-6
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool Complexes
0- 3
16
well developed -- inu ioints)
17
Illabitat colllplexitF
0 - 6
0-0
0-6
lill1i: Or 11(i habitat 0; trequent. varied hallit"11", - max poll to
Clumpy coverage overstreumbed
0 -5
0-1-5
0-5
%-cielnion = 0. oontimuytjs , no"� - max 11111-0
Substrate enibcddednes
NA,
0--4
0-4
nbcddel = 0;,loosc strl'Cliffc = 111i, -I
—
Presence of stream invertebrates (se, page -1)
in(, --vldcncc0 '. C(Illinion, till Me I OUS [nJ\ P itils)
0-4
0-5
0 - 5
0 - 4
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
aidenCe 0, Conlilli In. 111.1incrou., tylaN plints)
Presence of fish 0-4
0 -
0--I
c, j1vncc = 0: conmion, numerous type, n-lax-points) I
E� irictice or wildlife use
)jnLo
cvitictice = 0. abundmit c vidence = max p
'total Points Possible too I
I (,ill
100
T017AL -SCORE enter on first, page)
66

NC Division of Water Quality - Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11*'^
N
Date: (
Project/Site:
Yl.k Pak j.' Z
Latitude: 7r
Evaluator: �, _ 7 �o n
County:
xIC;, "��o-
Longitude:
/
Total Points: S
Stream is at least intermittent 2 9
Stream Determination (ci
Other b a
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
Ephemeral Intermittent(
e.g. Quad Name:
I I S)
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
C.31/
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
�
6
2
3
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
(
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
CD%
1_
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N - 00
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = f0 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
�3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1 ?
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1� _
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes= 3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = i � )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
?3)
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
d
1
2
3
22. Fish
0)
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0'
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
41

APPENDIX D
WETLAND FORMS
Flint Rock Farm #2 Preservation Project
EEP ID 92812 Appendices

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eat/ stern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: 0(6fP �la4�r�ctc O2 City /County: I'-efd /J?oCW1 lg6A Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: 10(.W State: iJL Sampling Point: (, I .Ad
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: ef&,Js00 ' («
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): i, A L- t Slope ( %):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LQR -hi t"A'fkat: �IIP, Z`0 ),.Z Long: — -1 01 4, S 1 Datum: 4"'�
Soil Map Unit Name: wev -Ayee ;:(t Lor- NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes I/-- No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation d , Soil 0 , or Hydrology y significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No P
Are Vegetation N) , Soil 0 , or Hydrology /`J naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 7 No
Is the Sampled Area \/
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ttyQr lu ly is 411Gd 1� aMQ IJA.r j lo, pre 5m & o � bccw� �q r� � ash do ��n t a.r►
d� T �l Ic . OmOAA
(oM C1oM�`C- UL�
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that aoolvl
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
V High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ ✓Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
1Moss Trim Lines (B16)
— Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ ✓Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_✓ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): O
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): O
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): b Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
r, 6"1 h,�dralo,y ri pf'cse-14- b-4 I'A51'JI and o.�frdf
of wc� -l�� Icbw�da,r{ ,
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover _pecies? Status
�
Number of Dominant Species
1,
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total Cover
Total % Cover of: MultiDIv bv:
SaDlina Stratum (Plot size: )
OBL species x 1 =
G
FACW species x 2 =
2.
FAC species x 3 =
3.
FACU species x 4 =
4.
UPL species x 5 =
5.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
= Total Cover
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1
_ 2 - Dominance Test is X50%
2
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is < -3.0'
3 `
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4.
__
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5
6.
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
7.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. 17o(�
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2 J ))
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
3.
4
Sapling —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
5.
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
6.
Shrub —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
8.
9
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
10.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
11
ft (1 m) in height.
12.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
= Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. \
2.
3.
4 `
Hydrophytic
``�-
Vegetation
5.
-
Present? Yes No
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point: I -te
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(inches)
Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
U -N
JOY2 (,12 $0
q.S yk. 4& ')
SHIN Lo-M
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
- I 1
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes V No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project /Site: W c e e N(w1e.1, �w � City /County: _ / Jt dC i'((Kt kt— Sampling Date: PV _ ( S
Applicant/Owner: "CEP 77 State: Ii�L Sampling Point: 1, �vvtd It tP
Investigator(s): %�)c r r9 .mil Section, Town3hip, Range: %L[rJ.5 L(P
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): L4 r lf4" r_ Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Litt -1� M(.rt14 •/7 G Lat: ZA i L- Long: — —1 q. OZI�;L'i Datum: )VAO ffi
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrol is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil A-1, or Hydrology V significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes X_ No
Are Vegetation A/., Soil W or Hydrology _L naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Yes �Cl No
Yes No
Yes No=
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired: check all that aaolv)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
_ Moss Trim Lines (816)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C1)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No �(� Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fr19Pe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover S ctes? Status
2 r� -alr-0. t-JIVe 10-A y L4f C_
3.
4.
5.
6.
Sanlina Stratum (Plot size:
1. \
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1. \2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Herb Stratum (Plot size
2.
3.
4
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
4-0_ = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sampling Point: U/ I L4 00
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
Z S6
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Total % Cover of:
Multioly bv:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) y
1. 41�1ce -ti )a/h) "tC / C
2. - ry -Ltx Zs F�L
3.��- y roc,
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 70 20% of total cover:_ Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants. including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants. except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) y
1. 41�1ce -ti )a/h) "tC / C
2. - ry -Ltx Zs F�L
3.��- y roc,
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 70 20% of total cover:_ Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: I�4p
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % woe' Loc`
V'[t_ to f- q_f0
'Type; C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ i hick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Texture Remarks
(, L_-
ZLocation: PL =r'ore Lminq, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (173)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (FE)
Iron- Manganese Masses IF 12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No _4
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

W e4h,.d - Z r"'-
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: /JC City /County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: Of -Ff? A State AA, Sampling Point: �kfl•�l Z Gv-E�
Investigator(s): Ams6dJ� x- 14i,r✓� - Ajr oo- Section, T nship Range: �✓�i�SU���G
If
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): /0A6 -wc Slope ( %): U-(
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): tJ NU 0,(3LLat: I_n � �/ `i `!i Long: ' -I cf, , �1Z'l9) Datum: v)
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: tw E
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil �� , or Hydrology f significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil ' f , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks: v�
�+�d� -� I a�^Q�:�:G� iL �zfcsertcl e� 6��u,,u �o.w� u�71!+'GOwt Grt �rowbl�Cvw�Ci
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Prim Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that aooly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
✓ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (814)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ ✓Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
undation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
VI
ater- Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): (7
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): 0
/
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): U Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes v No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover S ewes? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Awr Mbrav4 40 FC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: "' (A)
2. 1_1,xdW-V-C to P4-r_
Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across All Strata:
4.
5.
6.
7.
Saolino Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. P,(Ii,H[kwA C,((" +thui�LS
2.
3. F1�e0as [.+re4'niAAM1`tS
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
5
L�
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
f
US Army Corps of Engineers
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(B)
(A/B)
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species l x 3 = ' '6
FACU species x4=
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
= Total Cover
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
i
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
= Total Cover
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point: -VJ—Zt,&V
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
10 Gh
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project /Site: ��� 1" 1 Wi / r9L �( O� City /County: �rd St r t'It f� /6 raffiw,cT Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: xiGE& A State: eG Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): lie- k t WS dol./ X L 0 A Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace. etc.): ( - Local reh3f (concave, convex, none): f o&-LAS a Slope —
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): M&L-Qi3 t: )?0 2`w' `O Long: — � 1 °,7'�iQ� Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: (� -�kuJ iie NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _1tK_ No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation IV., Soil Al, or Hydrology y significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation 1✓ , Soil /1 , or Hydrology `✓ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks: I f
Ia d �fi5 het t r, c -eq� cf% t I&` -clf 5�­4 5 t4-e C%Lt e 4-0 h ere,e.— acAv; fy
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aoply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (814)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Table (A2)
— Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (0)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (813)
FAC- Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No _ K_ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
{includes capillary Irinqe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scienl
r
True Stratum (Plot size:
1 - & . ..-� rr
2. L a- 4A4,,...ff{�tc C
4
5
A
500% of total cover
Sanlino Stra im (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1. -J t, I C S l �tnrt+t
2.
3.
4.
5,
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50 °l0 of total cover:
50% of total cover:
V f W I All to A
50% of total cover:
ific names of plants.
Absolute Doninant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
a� x P A-C
Y,
s�L v
S�� = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 13
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
- Total Cover
20% of total cover:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover: 3
- Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: Vl_auP
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
7
5 O
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index - B/A -
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is X50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants. excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants. excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
It (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W od' 4f to
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe' Loc` Texture Remarks
0- rdr_ S=, lc,,,, 5=( /0 ��" �" S; L
ra- 10xl 5'-Lk LGf- 1=6 /0
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (AS)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL =Pore Lininq, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (1-3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (FE)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 4
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Wt kt"61 - 3 L­,A,
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: IJCFF t- �rVl�YoO� Z City /County: IQa VCA1k4'� Sampling Date:
ApplicanUOwner: kY ff P /� State: N C Sampling Point: 1'`)- 3 L ;-
Investigator(s): 1 f'N�� I �h1eiu4 -At ,,A - Section, Township, Range: lG
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 1�=')5kat: ain v
) Local relief (concave, convex, none): 4"eAL Slope ( %): l�Z
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): WFIZ N % ` • Zq) 61 ('0 Long: lei C017 4 00 Datum:
% l �f n U,e IQ -Z5 pur.�Kf erokj ►JaNG
Soil Map Unit Name: � nco f � �� ��au , NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes / No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation -L)—, Soil (� , or Hydrology ) significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Y No
Are Vegetation t), Soil �) , or Hydrology IF i naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired:
check all that aoolvl
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_/Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
High Water Table (A2)
— Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
�/ Saturation (A3)
-lydrogen
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
C Jnundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
✓Water- Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
/ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ? No
Depth (inches): b
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): o Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
2 ,1i Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 7 v I 0 S ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Sar lino Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Co-tVOIAA 5 C"D ji'n:.ne,
2. �i,u,dM� snu �'Ft •o�
I _ �
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
i
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1. V iMC40AAr"1
2. f%,.buJ Sp.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size
= Total Cover
s✓ 4C
Sampling Point: (Y 4(k-) -3- µeT
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _ (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
MultiDIv bv:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x3=
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Total Cover
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
13 = Total Cover a,6
1. oli(-y f- 664I -Yd Ir. � r/ -YAK
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
13 = Total Cover a,6
1. oli(-y f- 664I -Yd Ir. � r/ -YAK
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (173)
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe
to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Depressions (F8)
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
0 -5
10 42 5/6
ko
10k 5/1 111,0
.5- 16
10 41? </Z
�0
iv wTe S/�
10 fi
t o y2 Sal
(po
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
w- 3(,.t,-
2Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
—,Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (173)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes '/ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project /Site: ��twi rOt�4 ct ^Vvt � City /CountybJ50"11i 111. * 1'zi 16-1 . Sampling Date: 14-15—
Applicant/Owner: f _C l0 State: Sampling Point: W-,7-.4
Investigator(s): Q- Fit w`y't -- *X/ CG � Section, Township, Range: kef� i 'e-
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): l (oral a(a fb 2 Local relief (concave, convex, none): _"LWtJ41. Slope ( %):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): (,lif-a-IP, NU111 l -4 (P Lai: 1400 0 (P Long: ­7q, °o Zy e) Datum: �j 3
Soil Map Unit Name: Yr. ctjLP �- sw,d -I / d u r NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydroI is conditio on the site typical for this dme of year? Yes K No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes -k- No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _
Remarks:
&J v--
--"-'° &-I %to A tat -e.-
HYDROLOGY
No Is the Sampled Area
No_X_ within a Wetland?
No —4— /
i U �fht� sort Crec k t1 -c_-
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that aaDly)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants 16 14)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (69)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _
Water Table Present? Yes
Saturation Present? Yes _
(includes capillary frinqe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gau
Remarks:
Yes No
rrc_v-- M-,0 -&/ L-LA t%Jto$i
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (05)
No Depth (inches):
No Depth (inches): (�(/
_ No _ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No r'
3e, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
US Army Corps or Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: l/"' I Lrt)
Tree Stratum (Plot
/
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover S ? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
size:
/
cie
Number of Dominant Species *S�
1 �A 5KS C9rri.t��r
[�.��(.
�_ � 4
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: J (A)
2.
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
3. CKf Ar- -ht
�
K _
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: .3 (B)
4
9
It (1 m) in height.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
11.
Woody vine -- All woody vines, regardless of height.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: -� (A/B)
6.
Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
5_
Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x t =
Saolino Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
2
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supposing
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
V approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. /20t sI.t-L 1AM 14e -o� haldVsJar
C
,` rtL (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2.
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody plants. excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
B.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9
It (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody vine -- All woody vines, regardless of height.
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
oA 0 = Total Cover
f
50% of total cover: /O 20% of total cover:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: LP- / ue
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
finches - Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe, Loc`
0-1 16f 6- (o
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Hislosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
Thick Dark Surface (All 2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Texture Remarks
ZLocation: PL =Pore Lininq, W Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (0)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface(F7)
_ Redox Depressions (Fe)
iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No /-
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

t�,k At,,Ad 4
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project /Site: #C E- - r 64IL0 6, 4 t `f+ 1*()' City /County: 2CfeiSui (l l / ZJt+�
jcv"" Sampling Date: '— a
ApplicantlOwnec L Lm D State: LYil, Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): �� 1:�W}I ?-- Section, 'townshi Range: 2e;Asv +tkC
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): �fdoA P( "'n Local relief (concave, convex, none): (,O 'tftvf Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): G4 A,Al'aArRV Lat: ��Cp -29,nL Long: -19. S2C)7- Datum: VJ(As
Soil Map Unit Name: f wcolf;, - w.Jl 0.1 (..oars 15 4-+ 2S reeof el -or), fteu NWI classification: 0006
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes A_ No' (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation //, Soil W , or Hydrology —X significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes —C No
Are Vegetation y , Soil IV , or Hydrology %V naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Yes_ No
Yes No
Yes_ No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
X Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants 11314)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
X Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Drill Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Iron Deposits (BS)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
N, Water - Stained Leaves (89)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
rield Observations:
Yes No
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
__. Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Surface Watei Present? Yes No Depth (inches): C�
Water Table Present? Yes �_ No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes %C No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
� 4_nd,'n� Wd.�Ir 6
r, CdAki
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 0-4 tl/Z4'
Z �j�
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Jv
Tree Stratum (Plot size: /a 4S
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
2
1
ay 7 P:C
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
2
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
IOr'
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multioly bv:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover
OBL species x 1 =
Saalino Stratum) (Plot size:G ( C t
1. �1u al�td -1 �d- -4 L,F �fi
/� 1
FACW species x 2 =
rirt
2. 4- r, r- / -a h' %k
10 AC
FAC species SS x 3 = I65
3. Cc.—Diuuc,
C
FACU species 17 x 4 = 20
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (ao (A) (B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index - B/A = 3 073 .
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
- Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratumst (Plot size: ) q
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. 0 1-4 5 h� rk u VA bl f /64% r kilt UP
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. ✓`tr ( -ri 5 ie !k &n 1/Nowlf.' k r�
AA,,V
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3,
approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4
5.
Shrub - Woody plants. excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
13
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9
It (1 m) in height
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. G , I k1 roG,ueliW,
2.
3.
4.
5'
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation /
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Dei
Depth
(inches)
(9-1—
6L
l0+
:cription: (Describ
Matrix
Color (moist)
laE- S� b
s -1
e to the del
ga
©a
Sampling Point: V) - 9 V_t4_
rth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
10 l av r t'
4,p-
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic. (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches).
Remarks:
2Location: PL =Pore Lininq, M= Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F 19)
7 Depleted Matrix (1-3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (FE)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Red Parent Material (1721) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes " No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND rDETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern gMountains and Piedmont Region C�
Project /Site: (�/ �' V\��" T (�" ��F� !•-�•� City /County: l�fr ✓Svc `l P /' 0 �l'-'S� � Sampling Date: / 0
Applicant/Owner: flt�(iL G State: rr fi Sampling Point: /%/I(' u,�
Investigator(s): /4- EZ-"I Section, Township, Range: it oJSv' ((.7_
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): "t t �< <ir d Local relief (concave, convex, none): tr-t/t -f Slope ( %):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): - 4"1?1j QLat 3 � - 2 � 0 Z Long: —_7 ONZ - Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: f a(" ..� r(I� 1� Ld')'M NWI classification:
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation �, Soil �, or Hydrology � naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _X_ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes N0
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired),
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aDoly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B 14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (Cl)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No _ X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
mrludes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
d", Absolute Doninant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: d3 C. 114 % Cover Species? Status
2, l.l��d�r %mod✓ �. �r� ([_`
4.
5.
6.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: t 20% of total cover:
Sanlinq Stratum lot size 1
1.
2,
3.
4.
5.
6.
500% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. a)1\10.r(AuA liiF -,ac .fW.rJr5
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10
11
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
- Total Cover
Sampling Point:l' -03 4Q
Dominance Test worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Number of Dominant Species
OBL species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
/
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
x 4 =
l
Percent of Dominant Species
5 d
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
MUItiDIV bv:,
OBL species
x 1
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A -
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
20% of total cover:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
�d (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
t! = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: M v 3Y/o
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
(inches)
Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type, Loc`
Texture Remarks
vi
to f- K -to
_ Black Histic (A3)
C.G.
4 -10
Jul' t--c
-7
l,
C.L.
I U' it-
l0Y• S ]
7.,�-,(- Y- 6
C (,
'Type. C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix. MS= Masked Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL =f ore Lininq, M= Matrix,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F 2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (AS)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Remarks:
No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Mitigation Project Name
EEP IMS ID
River Basin
Cataloging Unit
Flint Rock Farm #2
92812
CAPE FEAR
03030002
ADDlled Credit Ratios: 1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 Various
"NOTE: Buffer breakdown
Rural non - subject 30 - 100 feet 449,552.0 @ 5:1 = 89,904.40
100 - 200 feet 63,354.0 @ 10:1 = 6,335.40
Rural subject 30 -100 feet 43,018.0 @ 10:1 = 4,301.80
555,894.0 sq ft = 100,541.60 credits
NOTE: Need to adjust debits to match assets available on this project -- did not have access to ledger on Friday to complete.
Information from EEP Debit Ledger dated 03/17/2015
E:
E°
E
E E
-°
E
c o
m m
c c
m o
c 0
m E
c°
m A
c c
m o
.
c
n c
o
c
� m
E
c c
m o
•
c
o
i m is
w c
m o
m e
0
- E
w e
m g
O
m
m
m
m
o.
a c
o. m
Q
am
L
o.°
c
2
o.
v
«°
d
« c
« d
7 y a
y v
N
N L
U°
N
N m
N
d' °
2 U
0' t
N
2 m
C N
o w
C
o U
C
o .°
C N
o m
N i/i
m m
;
m U
N R
m
N Vl
N
d
°
W
c
W
a`
°
W
a`
Z K
z
z c
W
Z a`
O K
U
o
U
o c
U W
o a`
U
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
3,686.27
7.35
0.13
555,894.0
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
737.25
1.4701
0.026
100,541.60
NCDOT Pre -EEP Debits (feet and acres): Not Applicable
EEP Debits (feet and acres):
DWQ Permit No
USACE Action IDs
Impact Project Name
NCDOT TIP R -2635 - Western
2007 -1470
2007 -02903
Wake Expressway, Wake Co
4,108.00
7.400
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
- 421.73
-0.050
0.13
555,894.00
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
0.000
0.000
0.03
100,541.60
"NOTE: Buffer breakdown
Rural non - subject 30 - 100 feet 449,552.0 @ 5:1 = 89,904.40
100 - 200 feet 63,354.0 @ 10:1 = 6,335.40
Rural subject 30 -100 feet 43,018.0 @ 10:1 = 4,301.80
555,894.0 sq ft = 100,541.60 credits
NOTE: Need to adjust debits to match assets available on this project -- did not have access to ledger on Friday to complete.
Information from EEP Debit Ledger dated 03/17/2015