20150709 Ver 1_Buffalo Crk Baseline Doc Report_20150722

FINAL
PRESERVATION PROJECT AND
BASELINE DOCUMENTATION REPORT
BUFFALO CREEK
DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
EEP Project No. 92603
Neuse River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03020201
Prepared for:
OS�Stcm
Ek a errent
PROGRgM
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
217 West Jones Street, Suite 3000A
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Prepared by:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
January 2015

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Buffalo Creek Preservation Project (Site) is located in northwest Durham County,
approximately 11 miles northwest of Durham on Buffalo Creek. The Site contains upper reaches
of the Buffalo Creek and North Little River stream systems, which drain to the Little River
Reservoir and Falls Lake. Current agricultural runoff, increasing urban land uses, and high
populations within the watershed are becoming of greater concern making preservation of Site
streams and riparian areas vital to maintaining water quality within the watershed and the water
supplies of the Little River Reservoir and Falls Lake.
This preservation report has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title
33 Navigation and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section § 332.8 paragraphs (c)(2)
through (c)(14) and 332.3(h); and NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fee
Instrument signed and dated July 28, 2010.
Site Description
Project Name and EEP Project Number Buffalo Creek - Project #92603
County
General Location
Basin
Physiographic Region
USGS Hydro Unit
NCDWQ Sub -basin
Watershed Planning Information
Preservation Mechanism
Conservation Values
Deed Recordation Date
Total Credit Linear Footage /Area
Total Mitigation Units
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603
Durham
11 miles northwest of Durham
Neuse
Piedmont
03020201
03 -04 -01
Within TLW 03020201020010
(North Fork Little River)
Conservation Easement
Permanent preservation of upper stream reaches and
riparian buffers, which drain to two water supplies:
Little River Reservoir and Falls Lake
November 16, 2007
Mitigation Assets
Warm Stream
9066.961f
670 SMUs
Riparian Buffer
963,141.671f
104,110 BMUs
Executive Summary Page i

Conservation values for this project include the following.
• Surrounded by a 50.33 acre Farmland Conservation Easement Area.
• Permanent preservation of upper stream reaches and riparian buffers, which drain to two
water supplies: Little River Reservoir and Falls Lake.
A conservation easement deed was recorded on November 16, 2007; the conservation easement
deed document is included in Appendix B.
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603 Executive Summary Page ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................. ...............................
i
1.0 PRESERVATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .................. ...............................
1
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................... ...............................
1
2.1 General Description .............................................................................. ...............................
1
2.2 Directions .............................................................................................. ...............................
1
3.0 SITE SELECTION ................................................................................... ...............................
2
4.0 BASELINE INFORMATION .................................................................. ...............................
2
4.1 Physical Features .................................................................................. ...............................
2
4.2 Plant and Wildlife Communities ........................................................... ...............................
2
4.3 Jurisdictional Streams ........................................................................... ...............................
2
5.0 SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT ..................................................... ...............................
3
5.1 Encumbrances ....................................................................................... ...............................
3
6.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS .......................................................... ...............................
3
7.0 LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................................. ...............................
4
8.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES .................................................................. ...............................
5
9.0 REFERENCES ......................................................................................... ...............................
5
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Figures and Photographs
Figure 1. Site Protection Instrument
Figure 2. Vicinity Map
Figure 3. Site Watershed Map
Figure 4. Site Mitigation Asset Map
Site Photographs
Appendix B. Site Protection Instruments
Appendix C. Stream Forms
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603 Table of Contents Page i

1.0 PRESERVATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The Buffalo Creek Preservation Project (Site) is located in the 03020201 Cataloging Unit (CU),
in the Neuse River Basin and Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) 03020201020010. The Site
addresses several issues /stressors identified within the watershed in the Neuse River Basin
Restoration Priorities (NCEEP 2010) and Neuse River Basin Water Resources Plan (NCDWR
2010) including the following.
• Agricultural Runoff
• Increasing Urban Land
• Nonpoint and Point Source Pollution
The Buffalo Creek Preservation Project addresses watershed stressors /issues with the following
goals.
• Protection of water quality by preserving riparian buffers within the Site in a permanent
conservation easement.
• Permanent preservation of upper stream reaches and associated riparian buffers in a
stream system within the Upper Neuse Watershed (03020201) that drains to the Little
River Reservoir and Falls Lake. The Upper Neuse Watershed is highly populated;
therefore, due to the number of people depending on the water supplies, management of
the water sources is of increasing importance (NCDWR 2010).
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
2.1 General Description
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) has established the Buffalo Creek
Preservation Project (Site) located off of Bill Poole Road (SR 1470) in the northwest corner of
Durham County. The Site is located in a parcel owned by Poole Farm Holdings, LLC (PIN
0819 -03 -31 -6464) within 14 -digit Cataloging Unit 03020201020010 (sub -basin 03- 04 -01) of the
Neuse River Basin (Figures 1 -3, Appendix A). The Site is protected by a permanent
conservation easement recorded in Deed Book 5798 Pages 435 -445. Current land -use at the Site
is comprised of mixed hardwood forest. Land -use adjacent to the Site consists of agricultural
fields and managed coniferous forest. The conservation easement boundary is well- marked with
posts and signage.
2.2 Directions
Directions to the Site from Raleigh (Figure 2, Appendix A):
➢ Travel west on I -40 to exit 279B (NC -147 N),
➢ Merge onto NC -147N and travel 7.3 miles,
➢ Take exit onto S Duke Street
➢ After 4.5 miles, Duke Street will change to US -501N (Roxboro Rd),
➢ Continue 12 miles, then turn left onto Bill Poole Rd,
➢ Bill Poole Rd crosses the Site in approximately 2 miles.
➢ Site Latitude, Longitude 36.2023, - 79.9538 (NAD83/WGS84)
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603 Page 1

3.0 SITE SELECTION
The Site contains upper stream reaches in the Buffalo Creek and North Fork Little River stream
systems, which is currently affected by agricultural runoff and increasing urban land uses.
Conservation Values
• Surrounded by a 50.33 acre Farmland Conservation Easement Area.
• Permanent preservation of upper stream reaches and riparian buffers, which drain to two
water supplies: Little River Reservoir and Falls Lake.
Threats of Adverse Modification
Adjacent agricultural land and increasing urban land uses adjacent to the Site threaten Site
streams and buffers; therefore, preservation of the Site is important to maintaining water quality
in the Buffalo Creek watershed, and downstream water supply reservoirs (Little River Reservoir
and Falls Lake).
4.0 BASELINE INFORMATION
4.1 Physical Features
The Site is located in the Carolina Slate Belt ecoregion of the Piedmont physiographic region of
North Carolina. Topography within the Carolina Slate Belt ecoregion is generally comprised of
dissected irregular planes, some hills, linear ridges, isolated monadnocks, and low- to moderate -
gradient streams with mostly boulder and cobble substrates. Topography within the Site is
moderate with elevations ranging from 510 feet at the downstream end of Site to 530 feet above
sea level at the top of the Site.
4.2 Plant and Wildlife Communities
The natural community dominating the Site is Mesic -Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont
Subtype). The vegetation is mature with a relatively full canopy throughout. Dominant species
include tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), and red oak
(Quercus rubra). Dominant understory species include ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana),
Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), common greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), and
muscadine (Muscadinia rotundifolia). Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) was observed
scattered throughout the Site, namely near the roadsides.
4.3 Jurisdictional Streams
Watershed Summary
The Site provides water quality function to a 4.8- square mile (3055 -acre) watershed at the Site
outfall (Figure 3, Appendix A). The Site drainage area is primarily composed of a mix of
agricultural and forested land, with sparse residential areas along state maintained roads.
Reach Summary
The Site contains 11 jurisdictional stream reaches (4 perennial and 7 intermittent), which total
7518 linear feet of stream; the table below gives information for each reach. Buffalo Creek is
listed as Water Supply — II, High Quality Waters, and Nutrient Sensitive Waters by the North
Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR 2013). Beaver activity in the upper portion of
UT Main and the entire length of UT1 is prevalent and has resulted in a large impounded area
(Photos 25 -32, 34, 44 -46, Appendix A). Additionally, eight areas of minor bank erosion and
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603 Page 2

instability were observed along Buffalo Creek (Photos 3, 4, 6, 47 -50, Appendix A). Both the
impounded area and the unstable areas are depicted on Figure 4 (Appendix A).
5.0 SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT
Length
(linear Feet)
3656.14
1594.63
746.88 (impounded)
72.83 (impounded)
76.78
158.88
555.85
94.24
227.56
69.80
116.64
147.79
7518.00
The land required for stewardship of this mitigation project includes portions of the following
parcels. A copy of the recorded conservation easement deed is included in Appendix B.
Site
Jurisdictional Stream Characteristics
Depicted on
Depicted on
Drainage
USACE
and Page
Type
USGS
NRCS Soil Map
Area (acres)
Form Score
Buffalo Creek
Perennial
Yes
Yes
3,008
76
UT -Main
Parcel 0819- 03 -31-
Conservation
Bk 5798 Pg
November
Holdi s
Perennial
Yes
Yes
886
67
UT -1
Perennial
Yes
Yes
184
--
UT-2
Intermittent
Yes
Yes
95
58
UT -3
Intermittent
No
No
22
50
UT -4
Perennial
Yes
Yes
225
70
AXE -1
Intermittent
No
No
<1
49
AXE -2
Intermittent
No
No
2
61
AXE -3
Intermittent
No
No
2
48
AXE -4
Intermittent
No
No
3
57
AXE -5
Intermittent
No
No
2
45
Total
5.0 SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT
Length
(linear Feet)
3656.14
1594.63
746.88 (impounded)
72.83 (impounded)
76.78
158.88
555.85
94.24
227.56
69.80
116.64
147.79
7518.00
The land required for stewardship of this mitigation project includes portions of the following
parcels. A copy of the recorded conservation easement deed is included in Appendix B.
All site protection instruments require 60 -day advance notification to the Corps and the State
prior to any action to void, amend, or modify the document. No such action shall take place
unless approved by the State.
5.1 Encumbrances
A 60 -foot public right -of -way for Bill Poole Road (SR 1470) bisects the conservation easement
on Buffalo Creek. In addition, the upper reaches of UT Main and the entire length of UT1 within
the Site is impounded from remnant beaver dams as well as current beaver activity; these areas
are not included in the mitigation credits.
6.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS
Verification of project mitigation assets was conducted in December 2014 with Global
Positioning Systems to validate perennial and intermittent stream lengths and locations (Figure 4,
Appendix A and Stream Dataforms, Appendix Q. The following tables summarize Site stream
reaches and mitigation assets.
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603 Page 3
Site
Deed Book
Date Deed Acreage
Parcel Landowner PIN
County Protection
and Page
Signed protected
Instrument
Number
Poole Farm
Parcel 0819- 03 -31-
Conservation
Bk 5798 Pg
November
Holdi s
Durham
32.24 acres
A 6464
LLC
Easement
435 -445
16, 2007
All site protection instruments require 60 -day advance notification to the Corps and the State
prior to any action to void, amend, or modify the document. No such action shall take place
unless approved by the State.
5.1 Encumbrances
A 60 -foot public right -of -way for Bill Poole Road (SR 1470) bisects the conservation easement
on Buffalo Creek. In addition, the upper reaches of UT Main and the entire length of UT1 within
the Site is impounded from remnant beaver dams as well as current beaver activity; these areas
are not included in the mitigation credits.
6.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS
Verification of project mitigation assets was conducted in December 2014 with Global
Positioning Systems to validate perennial and intermittent stream lengths and locations (Figure 4,
Appendix A and Stream Dataforms, Appendix Q. The following tables summarize Site stream
reaches and mitigation assets.
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603 Page 3

All credits will be released upon IRT approval. The project service area will be in compliance
with the EEP In -Lieu Fee Instrument.
Buffalo Creek, Durham County, Neuse River Basin, 03020201 Cataloging Unit
EEP Project Number 92603
Mitigation Credits
Non - riparian Riparian
Nitrogen
Phosphorous
Warm Stream Riparian Wetland Wetland Buffer
Nutrient
Nutrient
Preservation
Offset
Offset
Type R
RE R
RE R
RE
Buffer on Only
Buffer <50 feet from
Totals NA
670 NA
-- NA
-- 104,110
NA
NA
Stream Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Riparian Buffer Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Preservation components Mitigation Ratio Buffer Buffer Receiving
p g (square feet) Credit (square feet)
Rural Non - Subject Streams with 30 -100 foot Buffer from TOB 5:1 108,184.78 108,184.78
Rural Non - Subject Streams with 100 -200 foot Buffer from TOB 10:1 53,314.21* 53,314.21
Rural Subject Streams with 30 -100 foot Buffer from TOB 10:1 741,191.22 741,191.22
Rural Subject Streams with 100 -200 foot Buffer from TOB 20:1 234,966.50 ** 60,451.46
Total (square feet) 1,137,656.71 963,141.67
Total Buffer Mitigation Units 104,110
*The area of mitigation beyond 100 feet from the TOB for Rural Non - Subject Streams is 4.69% of the total mitigation area.
* *The area of mitigation beyond 100 feet from the TOB may comprise no more than 10 percent of the total mitigation area;
therefore, only 5.3 1 % of the area of mitigation beyond 100 feet from the TOB for Rural Subject Streams may receive credit.
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603 Page 4
Warm Stream
(linear feet)
Preservation
Impounded or
components
Buffer on Only
Buffer <50 feet from
Buffer 50 -100 feet
Buffer >100 feet
Total Stream by
one or both TOB
from both TOB
from both TOB
One Bank
(10:1)
(10:1)
(10:1)
Reach
(No Credit)
Buffalo
551.76
2045.50
1058.87
3656.14
Creek
UT -Main
746.88
143.52
780.91
670.19
2341.51
UT -1
72.83
72.83
UT -2
76.78
76.78
UT -3
158.88
158.88
UT -4
305.82
87.27
162.76
555.85
AXE -1
24.41
69.84
94.24
AXE -2
227.56
227.56
AXE -3
69.80
69.80
AXE -4
116.64
116.64
AXE -5
147.79
147.79
Total
819.71
1159.97
3054.73
2483.59
7518.00
(linear feet)
Total SMUs
0
116.00
305.47
248.36
670 SMUs
Riparian Buffer Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Preservation components Mitigation Ratio Buffer Buffer Receiving
p g (square feet) Credit (square feet)
Rural Non - Subject Streams with 30 -100 foot Buffer from TOB 5:1 108,184.78 108,184.78
Rural Non - Subject Streams with 100 -200 foot Buffer from TOB 10:1 53,314.21* 53,314.21
Rural Subject Streams with 30 -100 foot Buffer from TOB 10:1 741,191.22 741,191.22
Rural Subject Streams with 100 -200 foot Buffer from TOB 20:1 234,966.50 ** 60,451.46
Total (square feet) 1,137,656.71 963,141.67
Total Buffer Mitigation Units 104,110
*The area of mitigation beyond 100 feet from the TOB for Rural Non - Subject Streams is 4.69% of the total mitigation area.
* *The area of mitigation beyond 100 feet from the TOB may comprise no more than 10 percent of the total mitigation area;
therefore, only 5.3 1 % of the area of mitigation beyond 100 feet from the TOB for Rural Subject Streams may receive credit.
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603 Page 4

7.0 LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval for close -out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the Site will be transferred
to the NCDENR Division of Natural Resource Planning and Conservation's Stewardship
Program. This party shall be responsible for periodic inspection of the site to ensure that
restrictions required in the conservation easement or the deed restriction document(s) are upheld.
The NCDENR is currently evaluating the endowment model. Until the evaluation is complete
and any changes resulting from the model are implemented, the long -term management of this
project will be funded annually.
8.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES
Pursuant to Section IV H and Appendix III of the Ecosystem Enhancement Program's In -Lieu
Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources has provided the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District with a formal
commitment to fund projects to satisfy mitigation requirements assumed by EEP. This
commitment provides financial assurance for all mitigation projects implemented by the
program.
9.0 REFERENCES
NC Division of Water Resources (2010), Neuse River Basin Water Resources Plan. Department
of Environment and Natural Resources, NC Division of Water Resources, Raleigh, NC
NC Division of Water Resources (2013), Neuse River Basin Surface Water Classifications,
online (December 18, 2014). htto: / /vortal.ncdenr.ora /web /wQ /ps /csu/classifications. Department
of Environment and Natural Resources, NC Division of Water Resources, Raleigh, NC
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (2010), Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities, NC
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program,
Raleigh, NC
Schafale, M.P. and Weakley, A. S. (1990), Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina, Third Approximation, NC Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC
Stream Mitigation Guidelines, April 2003, US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District
Simon, A. 1989. A model of channel response in distributed alluvial channels. Earth Surfaces
Processes and Landforms 14 (1):11 -26.
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603 Page 5

APPENDIX A
FIGURES AND PHOTOGRAPHS
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603 Appendices

Y I ,
Iq
Wx
AL
^'p. ..� : - � fd 7u-'�' , a i T �r'�� �y � vT � T( �j, � �• 4 5
•`+ — �° - tlo 1 {"q t
•'Yr
7� r A# S 4 a
Legend
0 250 500 1,000
Feet Q Conservation Easement Boundary
Prepared for: Project: Title: Drawn by:
KRJ FIGURE
BUFFALO CREEK Date:
Y PRESERVATION SITE SITE PROTECTION DEC 2014
INSTRUMENT Scale:
- stem 1:3000
Durham County, NC
nx6m Enwoftnwsaa, Inc. t7 lal "('nleht Project No.:
FR Ue M
14 -018

Society, i -cubed
Direction to the Site from Raleigh: ;-
- Travel West on 1 -40 to exit 279B (NC -147 N), _
- Merge onto NC -147 N and travel 7.3 miles,
- Take the exit onto S Duke Street, C
- After 4.5 miles, Duke Street will change to US -501 N (Roxboro Road),
- Continue 12 miles, then turn left onto Bill Poole Road,
- The road will cross the site in 2 miles.
- Site Latitude, Longitude: 36.2023, - 78.9538 (NAD83 /WGS84)
Jy k W
f
y
i
l: 1
TIS �I�T
� .�`' ' � BUFFALO
CREEK
-cp� PRESERVATION
_ SITE
i 11
Y
L 555 °
i
-
•
T
,
'
a �, r
IV
Durham
County, NC
Title:
VICINITY
MAP
Drawn y
0 Date
r
Scale:
Project No.:
Na
y
-
n, d
Copyrlgh6 ©�0a1.3 *Na.tio,nalrGep.gra _ `,,o,�� s � ,,r,. _ - ,, •- ,� - - ��, � �
, ,..- SocletT I cubed - _
1 t *I R! -� Copyrlr ht:© 2013 National Geo , i -cubed ra hic Society, g 9 p Y
KRJ
DEC 2014
1:30000
14 -018
FIGURE
2

Legend1
C3 Site Watershed - 4.77 sq mi (31054.7 ac)
CZConservation Easement Boundary
N
9
2111MR/Irl-k1'1:i1' ABI
Y
•
�T
ff f^
F /}J
of
USGS Topographic Map - Rougemont, NC Quad -7
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000
Feet
Y
N _..
IL tt
.� axiom En.v}+onmx n.9al, Inc.
a Prepared for:
it�r �r
9 ?
-
Project:
~• .. BUFFALO
CREEK
a. • �'' •' N PRESERVATION
SITE
Durham
County, NC
fi • j ! Title:
! I
0 "'
• " •` • a � SITE
WATERSHED
MAP
♦9 }S
Drawn by:
KRJ
Date:
f` DEC 2014
Scale:
1:21000
` Project No.:
14 -018
FIGURE
* copyhig'ht:© 2013.National Geagraphie SocNety, i- cubed`

AX6m EnvrAnnt@n181, pnn
Prepared for:
r�
o tem
E' 1 1�Meffe eht
f�2ocaaM
Project: Title: Drawn by:
KRJ /CLF FIGURE
BUFFALO CREEK MITIGATION Date:
PRESERVATION SITE JAN 2015
ASSETS scale: 4
1:3000
Durham County, NC Project No.:
14 -018

Photo 1. Looking south from corner of bridge
towards the Site at EEP Boundary Marking
Photo 3. Downstream of bridge facing
downstream, showing some instability
Photo 5. Looking upstream on Buffalo Creek
along right bank
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603
Photo 2. Standing on bridge facing south
Photo 4. Outer bend on left bank of Buffalo
Creek showing instability
Photo 6. Outer bend on left bank of Buffalo
Creek showing instability
Appendices

Photo 7. Facing upstream on right bank of
Buffalo Creek at easement boundary
I
Photo 9. UT -4, facing upstream
Photo 11. Wrack along UT -4
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603
Photo 8. UT -3 entering from west
Photo 10. Stream bed sorting in UT -4
Photo 12. Easement marker at top of UT -4
Appendices

Photo 13. Small path along edge of easement,
north of UT -4
Photo 15. Facing downstream on AXE -5
Photo 17. Easement marker south of bridge
k
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603
Photo 14. Facing upstream on AXE -5
Photo 16. Berm on UT -4 facing downstream
Photo 18. From bridge facing upstream
Appendices

Photo 19. AXE -4 looking downstream
Photo 21. UT -Main facing upstream
Photo 23. UT -Main along beaver
impoundment facing upstream
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603
Photo 20. AXE -4 facing downstream of
headcut
Photo 22. UT -Main facing downstream
Photo 24. UT -Main along beaver
impoundment facing downstream
Appendices

Photo 25. Facing upstream on UT -Main from
second large beaver dam
Photo 27. Facing upstream on UT -Main
towards easement and fourth beaver dam
Photo 29. Another view of beaver lodge and
open water
Photo 26. Facing downstream on UT -Main
towards second large dam
Photo 28. Beaver lodge at the upstream end of
UT -Main
Photo 30. Open water facing upstream just at
upstream edge of easement
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603 Appendices

Photo 31. UT -Main facing upstream towards
beaver dam
Photo 33. AXE -3
Photo 35. Freshly felled tree along Buffalo
Creek
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603
Photo 32. AXE -2
Photo 34. Beaver dam on Buffalo Creek
Photo 36. Easement marker along Buffalo
Creek
Appendices

Photo 37. Buffalo Creek
Photo 39. Downstream along Buffalo Creek
north of bridge
Photo 41. Big bend in Buffalo Creek
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603
Photo 38. Facing offsite at upstream end of
Buffalo Creek, towards northeast
Photo 40. Upstream along Buffalo Creek north
of bridge
Photo 42. Facing south along Buffalo Creek
Appendices

Photo 43. Confluence of UT -Main and
Buffalo Creek
a r '
.JS
Photo 45. Beaver impoundment facing UT -1
Photo 47. Outer bend showing instability
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603
Photo 44. Beaver dam on UT -Main
Photo 46. Beaver impoundment looking
towards Photo -30
Photo 48. Outer bend along Buffalo Creek
showing instability
Appendices

Photo 49. Outer bend on Buffalo Creek Photo 50. Outer bend on Buffalo Creek
sloughing
Photo 51. Slough of outer bend on Buffalo
Creek
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603 Appendices

APPENDIX B
SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENTS
Poole Farm Holdings, LLC Parcel. Recorded Conservation Easement
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603 Appendices

III,IIIII'iu�iWNVV1�h1B1PVlll
5pR REGI5TRATIG REGISTER OF DEEDS
taillie LCOU TV
D n� Gn
URHPI�
2g No 16 p4 26 . i Pfd
B1(;a798 PG ,435 -445 F�E:$41.pp
NC RSV 5MP'.1ER
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
DURHAM COUNTY
SPO File Number 032 -ZE
Prepared by: Office of the Attorney General
Property Control Section
Return to. NC Department of Administration
State Property Office
1321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1321
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT DEED, pursuant to the provisions of N.C.
General Statutes Chapter 121, Article 4 and made this /o '' " day of &,/a"" ,
2007, by Poole Farm Holdings, LLC, ( "Grantor "), whose mailing address is 101 W. Main St.,
First Floor, Durham, NC 27701, to the State of North Carolina, ( "Grantee "), whose mailing
address is State of North Carolina, Department of Administration, State Property Office, 1321
Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1321. The designations Grantor and Grantee as used
herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include singular,
plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143 -214.8 et seq., the State
of North Carolina has established the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (formerly known as the
Wetlands Restoration Program) within the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
for the purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring, enhancing, creating and preserving wetland
and riparian resources that contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood
prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; and
WHEREAS, The State of North Carolina is qualified to be the Grantee of a Conservation
Easement pursuant to N.C. Gen. Slat. § 121 -35; and
WHEREAS, the Ecosystem Enhancement Program in the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources has approved acceptance of this instrument; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina
Department of Transportation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
District entered into a Memorandum of Agreement, (MOA) duly executed by all parties in
Page I of 9

Greensboro, NC on July 22, 2003. This MOA recognizes that the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program is to provide for compensatory mitigation by effective protection of the land, water and
natural resources of the State by restoring, enhancing and preserving ecosystem functions; and
WHEREAS, the acceptance of this instrument for and on behalf of the State of North
Carolina was granted to the Department of Administration by resolution as approved by the
Governor and Council of State adopted at a meeting held in the City of Raleigh, North Carolina,
on the 8th day of February 2000; and
W HEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying, and being
in Mangum Township, Durham County, North Carolina (the "Property "), and being more
particularly described as that certain parcel of land containing approximately 116.6 acres and
being conveyed to the Grantor by deed as recorded in Deed Book 5192 at Page 121 of the
Durham County Registry, North Carolina; and
WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement over the herein
described areas of the Property, thereby restricting and limiting the use of the included areas of
the Property to the terms and conditions and purposes hereinafter set forth, and Grantee is willing
to accept such Conservation Easement. This Conservation Easement shall be for the protection
and benefit of the waters Buffalo Creek and Turnpike Branch.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and
restrictions hereinafter set forth, Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably hereby grants and
conveys unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity, a Conservation
Easement of the nature and character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over a described area
of the Property, referred to hereafter as the "Easement Area ", for the benefit of the people of
North Carolina, and being all of the tract of land as identified as N.C, Ecosystem Enhancement
Program Permanent Conservation Easement as shorn on a plat of survey entitled "N. C.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Permanent Conservation Easement" elated October 9, 2007,
certified by Steven M. Puckett, PLS L -3991, and recorded in Plat Book 179, Page 290,
Durham County Registry, and being more particularly described as follows:
[SEE EXHIBITS A, B]
The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain, restore, enhance, create and
preserve wetland and /or riparian resources in the Easement Area that contribute to the protection
and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat. wildlife habitat,
and recreational opportunities; to maintain permanently the Easement Area in its natural
condition, consistent with these purposes; and to prevent any use of the Easement Area that will
significantly impair or interfere with these purposes. To achieve these purposes, the following
conditions and restrictions are set forth:
I, DURATION OF EASEMENT
Pursuant to law, including the above referenced statutes, this Conservation Easement
shall be perpetual and it shall run with, and be a continuing restriction upon the use of, the
Property, and it shall be enforceable by the Grantee against the Grantor and against Grantor's
heirs, successors and assigns, personal representatives, agents, lessees, and licensees.
Page 2 of 9

II. GRANTOR RESERVED USES AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITES
The Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that would impair
or interfere with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Unless expressly reserved as a
compatible use herein, any activity in, or use of, the Easement Area by the Grantor is prohibited
as inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Any rights not expressly
reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the Grantee. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, the following specific uses are prohibited, restricted, or reserved as
indicated:
A. Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the right to undeveloped
recreational uses, including hiking, bird watching, bunting and fishing, and access to the
Easement Area for the purposes thereof. Usage of motorized vehicles in the Easement Area is
prohibited, except as they are used exclusively for management, maintenance, or stewardship
purposes, and on existing trails, paths or roads.
B. Educational Uses. The Grantor reserves the right to engage in and permit others
to engage in educational uses in the Easement Area not inconsistent with this Conservation
Easement, and the right of access to the Easement Area for such purposes including organized
educational activities such as site visits and observations. Educational uses of the property shall
not alter vegetation, hydrology or topography of the site.
C. Vegetative Cutting. Except as related to the removal of non - native plants,
diseased or damaged trees, and vegetation that obstructs, destabilizes or renders unsafe the
Easement Area to persons or natural habitat, all cutting, removal, mowing, harming, or
destruction of any trees and vegetation in the Easement Area is prohibited.
D. Industrial, Residential and Commercial Uses. All are prohibited in the
Easement Area.
E. Agricultural Use. All agricultural uses within the Easement Area including any
use for cropland, waste lagoons, or pastureland are prohibited.
F. New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home, antenna,
utility pole, tower, or other structure constructed or placed in the Easement Area.
G. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails, walkways, or
paving in the Easement Area. Existing roads or trails located in the Easement Area may be
maintained by Grantor in order to minimize runoff, sedimentation and for access to the interior
of the Property for management, maintenance, stewardship purposes, or undeveloped
recreational and educational uses of the Easement Area. Existing roads, trails or paths may be
maintained with loose gravel or permanent vegetation to stabilize or cover the surfaces.
H. Signs. No signs shall be permitted in the Easement Area except interpretive signs
describing restoration activities and the conservation values of the Easement Area, signs
identifying the owner of the Property and the holder of the Conservation Easement, signs giving
Page 3 of 9

directions, or signs prescribing rules and regulations for the use of the Easement Area may be
allowed.
I. Dumping or Storing, humping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances or machinery, or other material in the Easement Area is
prohibited.
J. Grading, Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging. There shall be no grading,
filling, excavation, dredging, mining, or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat,
minerals, or other materials.
K. Water Quality and Drainage Patterns. There shall be no diking, draining,
dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or diverting, causing, allowing or
permitting the diversion of surface or underground water. No altering or tampering with water
control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced, or created
drainage patterns. All removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into waters, springs, seeps,
or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited. In the event of an emergency
interruption or shortage of all other water sources, water from within the Easement Area may
temporarily be used for good cause shown as needed for the survival of livestock and agricultural
production.
L. Subdivision and Conveyance. Grantor voluntarily agrees that no subdivision,
partitioning, or dividing of the underlying fee that is subject to this Easement is allowed. 'Unless
agreed to by the Grantee in writing, any future conveyance of the underlying fee for the
Easement Area and the rights as conveyed herein shall be as a single block of property. Any
future transfer of the fee simple shall be subject to this Conservation Easement. Any transfer of
the fee is subject to the Grantee's right of ingress, egress, and regress over and across the
Property to the Easement Area for the purposes set forth herein.
M. Development Rights. All development rights are removed from the Easement
Area and shall not be transferred.
N. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or
impairment of the natural features of the Easement Area or any intentional introduction of non-
native plants, trees and/or animal species by Grantor is prohibited.
The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good cause shown,
provided that any such request is consistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement.
The Grantor shall not vary from the above restrictions without first obtaining written approval
from the N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program, whose mailing address is 1652 Mail Services
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652.
III. GRANTEE RESERVED USES
A. Ingress, Egress, Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors
and assigns, receive the perpetual right of general ingress, egress, to the Easement Area over the
Property at reasonable times to undertake any activities to restore, manage, maintain, enhance,
and monitor the wetland and riparian resources of the Easement Area, in accordance with
Page 4 of 9

restoration activities or a long -term management plan. Unless otherwise specifically set forth in
this Conservation Easement, the rights granted herein do not include or establish for the public
any access rights.
B. Restoration Activities. These activities include planting of trees, shrubs and
herbaceous vegetation, installation of monitoring wells, utilization of heavy equipment to grade,
fill, and prepare the soil, modification of the hydrology of the site, and installation of natural and
manmade materials as needed to direct in- stream, above ground, and subterraneous water flow.
W. ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. Enforcement. To accomplish the purposes of this Conservation Easement,
Grantee is allowed to prevent any activity within the Easement Area that is inconsistent with the
purposes of this Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the Easement
Area that may have been damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this
Conservation Easement by Grantor, their successors or assigns, that comes to the attention of the
Grantee, the Grantee shall, except as provided below, notify the Grantor, their successors or
assigns in writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have ninety (90) days after receipt of such
notice to correct the conditions constituting such breach. if the breach remains uncured after
ninety (90) days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by appropriate legal
proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief. The Grantee shall also have the
power and authority, consistent with its statutory authority; (a) to prevent any impairment of the
Easement Area by acts which may be unlawful or in violation of this Conservation Easement; (b)
to otherwise preserve or protect its interest in the Property; or (c) to seek damages from any
appropriate person or entity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate
right, without notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate
relief if the breach of the term of this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or
otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation. Easement. The
Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such circumstances damage to the Grantee would
be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate. The rights and remedies of the Grantee
provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies
available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement.
B. Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, have
the right, with reasonable notice, to enter the Easement Area over the Property at reasonable
times for the purpose of inspection to determine whether the Grantor, their successors or assigns
are complying with the terms, conditions and restrictions of this Conservation Easement.
C. Acts Beyond Grantor's Control. Nothing contained in this Conservation
Easement shall be construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor, their
successors or assigns, for any injury or change in the Easement Area caused by third parties,
resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control, including, without limitation, fire, flood,
storm, and earth movement, or from any prudent action taken in good faith by the Grantor under
emergency conditions to prevent; abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, damage to property
or harm to the Property resulting from such causes.
D. Costs of Enforcement. Beyond regular and typical monitoring, any costs
incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terns of this Conservation Easement against Grantor, their
Page 5 of 9

successors or assigns, including, without limitation, any costs of restoration necessitated by
Grantor's acts or omissions in violation of the terms of this Conservation Easement, shall be
borne by Grantor.
E. No Waiver. Enforcement of this Easement shall be at the discretion of the
Grantee and any forbearance, delay or omission by Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the
event of any breach of any term set forth herein shall not be construed to be a waiver by Grantee.
V. MISCELLANEOUS
A. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the
Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or
agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be invalid, the
remainder of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, and the application of such provision
to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not be
affected thereby.
B. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested
to the parties at their addresses shown above or to other address(es) as either party establishes in
writing upon notification to the other.
C. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address and any party to
whom the Property or any part thereof is to be transferred at or prior to the time said transfer is
made. Grantor further agrees to make any subsequent lease, deed, or other legal instrument by
which any interest in the Property is conveyed subject to the Conservation Easement herein
created.
D. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall
survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Property or any portion thereof.
E. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in writing signed by all
parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the qualification of this
Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable laws, and is consistent
with the purposes of the Conservation Easement.
P. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation Easement
are in gross and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees,
that in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the
interest will be a qualified holder under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121 -34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the
Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the
transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in
perpetuity the conservation purposes described in this document.
V1. QUIET ENJOYMENT
Grantor reserves all remaining rights accruing from ownership of the Property, including
the right to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in only those uses of the Easement
Area that are expressly reserved herein, not prohibited or restricted herein, and are not
Page 6 of 9

inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, the Grantor expressly reserves to the Grantor, and the Grantor's invitees and
licensees, the right of access to the Easement Area, and the right of quiet enjoyment of the
Easement Area.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto the State of
North Carolina for the aforesaid purposes.
AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of said premises in fee and has the right to
convey the permanent Conservation Easement herein granted; that the same are free from
encumbrances except for those exceptions set forth in Schedule B, Section 2 of the title insurance
commitment issued by Chicago "title Insurance Company having number 34 106 DU06-
0017054, and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against the claims of all
persons whomsoever.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day
and year first above written.
Poole Farm Holdings, LLC
By: Unique Places, LLC, its Mana er
By: RA Seal)
u nevere Abernat V. its Manager
STATE OF CWajl,�q,
COUNTY OF , �r" nr,
I certify that the following persons) personally appeared before me this day, each
acknowledging to me that he or she signed the foregoing document: Gwywvtxt, f*-
1
%N " 0 %W i 0#p* 1
[Official Seal] � 5Vj sod ��i
4S- �.
�V
Page 7 of 9
Notary Public
Print Name:13 ex5 av�, HC, 6+OA-
My commission expires:- ,AMkoW io zv 1'Z

"EXHIBIT A "
Legal Description for Conservation Easement
On Tax Parcel ID 4 189471
As shown in Plat Book 179 Page 290
Mangum Township, Durham County, North Carolina
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION —
Tract 1
Being a certain parcel located in Mangum Township, Durham County, NC located on the south
side of Bill Poole Road (S.R. 1470) and being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at an iron stake on the southern right of way line of Bill Poole Road (S.R. 1470) being
located N65 °35'14 "E, 1385.59' from the centerline intersection of S.R. 1536 and S.R. 1535 in
Orange County, NC; then along the southern right of way line of Bill Poole Road N65 °35'33 "E,
92.46' to a point and N65 °53' 19 "E, 263.30' to an iron stake; then leaving the southern right of
way line of Bill Poole Road S06 °54'53 "W, 112.16' to an iron stake; then S43 °00'20 "W, 164.87'
to an iron stake; then SO4'3 1'46"W, 378.49' to an iron stake; then S28 °59'42 "E, 183.61' to an
iron stake; then S12 °25'41 "E, 549.72' to an iron stake in the northern boundary line of Kerry
McKenzie as described in Deed Book 2801 Page 133; then with McKenzie S72 °29'03 "W,
149.63' to an iron stake; then S83 °36' 19 "W, 574.04' to an iron stake; then leaving the McKenzie
line N35 °59'31 "W, 269.43' to an iron stake; then N76 °59'47 "E, 169.52' to an iron stake; then
S74 050'05 "E, 269.42' to an iron stake; then N07 °24' 19 "E, 376.07' to an iron stake; then
N09 °1VI 7"W, 340.74' to an iron stake; then NI 1'29'44"E, 382.56' to the Point of Beginning
containing 10.718 Acres.
Page 8 of 9

"EXHIBIT B "
Legal Description for Conservation Easement
On Tax Parcel Ill # 189472
As shown in Plat Boole 179 Page 294_
Mangum Township, Durham County, North Carolina
Tract 2
Being a certain parcel located in Mangum 'Township, Durham County, NC located on the north
side of Bill Poole Road (S.R. 1470) and being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at an iron stake on the northern right of way line of Bill Poole Road (S.R. 1470) being
located N63 °24'07E, 1561.90' from the centerline of intersection of S.R. 1536 and S.R. 1535 in
Orange County, NC; then leaving the right of way line of S.R. 1470 N06° 17'30 "W, 285.27' to
an iron stake; then N32 °55'58 "W, 640.32' to an iron stake; then N53 °43'50 "W, 389.15' to an
iron stake in the eastern line of Lot 1 depicted on Plat Book 76 Page 184 (Orange County, NC
Registry); then along the line of Lot 1 N07 057'56 "E, 275.13' to an iron stake; then along the line
of Lot 2 depicted on Plat Book 76 Page 184 N07 °59' 18 "E, 99.34' to an iron stake being the
southwest corner of M.L. Honeycutt, Jr. Property as depicted on Plat Book 166 Page 7; then
along the southern line of the Honeycutt and Compton Properties as depicted on Plat Book 166
Page 7 S53 °49'18 "E, 455.96' to a stone; then S33 °48'35 "E, 415.14' to a stone, then
S68 025'59 "E, 157.59 to a stone; then N44 °11'41 "E, 249.79' to a stone; then N29'19'41 "E,
196.88' to a stone; then N14 °30'47 "E, 221.16' to a stone; thenN53 °55'58 "E, 402.45' to a stone;
then N28'2 1'09"E, 134.14' to a stone; then N54'10'1 7E, 92.45' to a stone; then N63 °33'28 "E,
418.56' to an iron stake; thenN04°34'06 "W, 87.31' to a stone; then S50 °43'48 "E, 151.36, to an
axle being at the southwest corner of George Reeves as depicted on Plat Book 96 Page 150
(Tract 4); then along the line of George Strader as depicted on Plat Book 96 Page 150 (Tract 5)
S46 049'21 "W, 268.19' to an iron stake; then S47 °28'07 "W, 211,50' to an iron stake; then
S40 °53'23 "W, 230.99' to an iron stake; then S21 °31'55 "W, 402.48' to an iron stake being the
southwest corner of Plat Book 96 Page 150 (Tract 5) and on the northern line of Tract D depicted
on Plat Book 179 Page 145; then along the line of Tract D N74 °04'52 "W, 60.29' to an iron
stake; then S27 °02'33 "W, 889.83' to an iron stake; then Sl 1 °28'59 "W, 147.12' to an iron stake
on the northern right of way line of Bill Poole Road; then along the northern right of way line of
Bill Poole Road S66 °03' 14 "W, 78.76' to a point; then S65 °53' 19 "W, 180.99' to the Point of
Beginning containing 21.517 Acres.
The above described tracts being depicted as "N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program Permanent
Conservation Easement" on map entitled "Boundary Survey for; N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement
program permanent conservation Easement" dated October 9, 2007 by S.D. Puckett and
Associates and recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds in Durham. County, NC in Plat
Book 179 Page 290.
Page 9 of 9

U.F ALICE n 10T:
lo
Lace Ban NI.p (NtS)
XV
CA Wipsfe— ,
OkL G LEE,*,
Do 172019"
PIS 1291AT
S.D. Puckett & Associate.-
Pmfossionjl Land So 'Lyw�
155 Ns" %
!rh ' kLNL&LL.W91
LINE'
S.D_ Fuekekt & Asgodlils
7)'
547 _k
r
N-
MATCH LINE
ME) W­ _W..
C­ S.—
3111 EAR., AFNr
rjr 'r
Me& AaE3 fyOrAL)
so'
9) UN— R;� R..
1,
F] P.,
j
FILED
Pill BDOk 122 P.VQ
DaTB 10-IS-07 Ttll
��
E
38.390 ACHES (YOTAL)
..w r.VAI_r
fS.9711 ACRES
Boundary Survey for:
4'
N. C. Ecosystem
CA Wipsfe— ,
OkL G LEE,*,
Do 172019"
PIS 1291AT
S.D. Puckett & Associate.-
Pmfossionjl Land So 'Lyw�
155 Ns" %
!rh ' kLNL&LL.W91
LINE'
S.D_ Fuekekt & Asgodlils
7)'
547 _k
r
N-
MATCH LINE
ME) W­ _W..
C­ S.—
3111 EAR., AFNr
rjr 'r
Me& AaE3 fyOrAL)
so'
9) UN— R;� R..
1,
F] P.,
j
FILED
Pill BDOk 122 P.VQ
DaTB 10-IS-07 Ttll
Boundary Survey for:
4'
N. C. Ecosystem
Enhancement Program
UI
Permanent Conservation Easement
FLr�
El
FIL
DctcL*,%2M7
14fr,,
— To1.� hipo(KfAnguw -County of Durham -Statt& N.C.

Alt
WILLIE L. COVINGTON
REGISTER OF DEEDS, DURHAM COUNTY
DURHAM COUNTY COURTHOUSE
200 E. MAIN STREET
DURHAM, NC 27701
PLEASE RETAIN YELLOW TRAILER. PAGE
It is part of recorded document, and must be submitted with original for re- recording
and/or cancellation.
Filed For Registration: 1111612007 04:26:12 PM
Book: RE 5798 Page: 435 -445
Document No.: 2007051668
DEED -EASE 11 PGS $41.00
NC REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX: $291.00
Recorder: SHARON M CEARNEL
2007051668

APPENDIX C
STREAM FORMS
Buffalo Creek Preservation Project
EEP ID 92603 Appendices

NC DWQ,rStream Ifdentifica
Date:
Evaluator: `FtL�'_
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if k 19 or perennial rf a 30'
BurC &4 0 (ire 'r
tion Form Version 4.11
Project/Site: 1 >.Jf ?, , Latitude:
County: D, l4v Longitude: - 7W. q�-3�y
Stream Determination (cir Other iti'yce..,-
Ephemeral Intermittent ��ntall ' e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_d c s-_ 1
Absent
Weak_
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0 -
- - - - 1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -poor,
0
1
2
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
8. Headcuts
1-)
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
i 1
1.
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
I (-des = 3�
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
_Q.'
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
i!'
0.5
0 S
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
(9
1.5
P 16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
re s
C. Biology (Subtotal 7 )
`�
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
%
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
'31
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3 1
2.1. Aquatic Mollusks
0
'1,r
2
3
22. Fish
0
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
415
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0..5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
"perennial streams may also be identified
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1,5 Oltt�er�')
using other methods. See P.
35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:

USAGE AID# DWQ # Site # (V kindicate on attached map)
F + STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: /I/ 2. Evaluator's name: 011, ..OuC
3, Date of evaluation: r !t �' r�. �Gf 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: N J f6+llu C--e-10- 5. River basin: dplo. _
7. Approximate drainage area: Il �m 8. Stream order: -
9. Length of reach evaluated: �� r 10. County:u
11. Site coordinates (if known) :? �-076 6 K34 12. Subdivision name (if any): - --
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): c_
15. Recent weather Conditions: rrr rte. v1. r d y Ir `1:lvr S
16. Site conditions at time of visit: ':;c, -,,. - Car
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 14 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries
-�- Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters -----W,' ater Supply Watershed
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? S NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: r -v,
19, Does channel appear on USGS quad map? �NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey"? (!?�S NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential '%a Commercial % Industrial E;O % Agricultural
' % Forested % Cleared 1 Logged % Other ( -
22. Bankfull width: 3 0 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 17 - �'') '
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) C%entle (2 to 4° Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep (>I 0%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional ens Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (loc & -ed-on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign paints to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's Signature i/ _ — Date I y �rrj
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USAGE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103. To Comment, please call 919 -876 -8441 x. 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT W0iussnhv.T
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
#
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams,
CHARACTERISTICS ICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow 1 persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
r_'°
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max poi nts
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0 - 4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
I L�
no discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max pints
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
r
no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
,x
7
Entrenchment 1 floodplain access
0- 5
0- 4
0- 2
C J
(deeply entrenched = 0; fie went flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
no wetlands = 0; Tare adjacent wetlands = max
points)-�
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0- 4
0-3
]
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
to
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0- 4
extensive dc position= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
1 1
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
J
0 -5
0 -5
0 -5
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
4
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
l�
no visible roots = 0; dense routs throughout = max points)
! 5
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 - 4
0 - 5
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max oints
16
Presence of riffle- poollripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
5-
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = mar points)
4
17
Habitat complexity
-Little
0-6
0 - 6
0-6
or no habitat = 0• frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max p Dints
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
1
1
no evidence = 0; common, numerous 13,pes = max
{,
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0 - 4
0-4
O
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
22
Presence of fish
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0 -6
0 -5
0 -5
J. no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible —r
]00
100
100
-, TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
1(G
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams,

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4,11 QT-Y .'n
Date: + It
ProjectlSite:
< +lam Meet - V-r
Latitude:
��
I
u_4
Y
Evaluator: t4o
County:
,,,,orA
Longitude: `
35-
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent (
Stream Determination (crc
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other pfn ,,�� +
(dame:
it? 19 or perennial if? 30'
e.g. Quad
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
0 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
r 1^
3
P 1 In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
1
2
, 3)
`I ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
C3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2)
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
a. Headcuts
0,-.?
1
2
9, Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1 _
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes =3)
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = I }
11 Presence of Baseflow
p
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
(
1
( 2,)
3
14. Leaf litter
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5-1
1.�
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
SP.S - ='
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Les - 3
G. Biology (Subtotal
18, Fibrous roots in streambed
31r
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
_V
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
f 22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0;
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
01
0.5
1
1.5
25, Wetiand plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. 'See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:

ttl• , s*
USACE AID# DWQ # - -- Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET ' F'
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: JJ st? 2. Evaluator's name: "'"'1`�' � �r►�
1 e
3. date of evaluation: Z f i I Pq 4. Time of evaluation:: 1 45
5. Name of stream: q a Vr(' b rtchc 6. River basin: 1 twe
7. Approximate drainage area: (6 %( 8. Stream order: I ?)
9. Length of reach evaluated: It), County: f2. d-, AA
11. Site coordinates (if known): - a - i 3 3S 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Nape
15. Recent weather conditions: &A Mo
16. Site conditions at time of visit: L► a. .�+�•�
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters ' Water Supply Watershed_ (l -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? OF NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 7 3,t-r
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: ril% Residential %u Commercial yc— % Industrial 'W;-0/o Agricultural
5f> Forested /{,7% Cleared / Logged % Other 6 1
22. Bankfull width: 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 4 %) V-11, Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep (>I 0%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends. Frequent Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (Located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 104, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's Signature � - `Y� Date I � - I /_ 0
This channel evaluation form ' intend tetiesed only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not 'imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#£
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow f persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
o —f
0 -4
0 -5
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
o-4
0— 4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
J
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
no discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max points)
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
x
7
Entrenchment 1 floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0 - 4
2 `
0-2
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max onts
Channel sinuosity
0— S
0— 4
0— 3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0 —4
0-4
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
r
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
�r
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 — S
0-5
severe erosion = 0• no erosion stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on bunks
o-3
0 - 4
0-5
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0 — 5
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle - pool /ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max oints
es~
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
Canopy coverage over streambed+
x
1 8
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
0-5
0 - 5
0 — 5
L.
l9
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 — 4
7
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 5
0
no evidence = 0• common. numerous es = max points)
-
_ 5
- :)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
Q
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max
points)-�
©
22
Presence offish
0-4
0-4
0-4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 — 5
0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence =max pints
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: I H Project/Site:
gA(Ukb Creels
Evaluator: ;, . , . f'.. County: 9_L.,.n
Iota! Points: -- - Stream Deter circle one)
Stream is at least intermittent ` Ephemeraf ermitite Perennial
if ? 19 or perennial if a 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 13. i
Absent
Weak
12' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3. In- channel structure: ex. rife -pool step -pool,
0
1
ripple -pool sequence
�'Q
f 25. Algae
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
6- Depositional bars or benches
0
(12
7. Recent alluvial_ deposits
0
1
8. Headcuts
("o)
1
9. Grade control
0
0.5
10. Natural valley -
0
� 5, ---a-
11. Second or greater order channel
Nod= 0,31
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 2.5 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
r0/)
1
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris_
0
0.5
_
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
a =
C. Biology (Subtotal = . r- 1
`�
Latitude:jf b
Longitude;
Other f��tt C cd t
e.g. Quad Name?
Moderate
(2)
{27)
2
2
2
r4 R
Yes = 3
2
2
Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
w 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
(3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)p
b
21. Aquatic Mollusks
2
22. Fish -
0)
23. Crayfish
0
24. Amphibians
�'Q
f 25. Algae
KO)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
Y
`{perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes. ll *'? d U V - 19 .-. r 4 d ".
Sketch:
�:
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
0.5 C
1
0.5
1
0.5
1
0.5
1
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
Strong
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1.5
1.5
3
3
0
1.5
1.5
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

f Y
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # F (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the Following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Nc. 66P 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: 121011m 4. Time of evaluation: l l 3cr
5. Name of stream: i { „de r _ 'Z 6. River basin: P, e
7. Approximate drainage area:tg c— 8. Stream order: 0
}
9, Length of reach evaluated: 50 p 10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): - D1, - !ie 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any) :�
15. Recent weather conditions: �, 0 1 — du" � � 4..r
16. Site conditions at time of visit: :4 - d rda
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters _ Vater Supply Watershed ([-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? VE_S )NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 0
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? 0 NO 20, Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: ( 0 % Residential % Commercial % Industrial 7�'iu Agriculturai
22. Bankfull width:
&.) % Forested
,� -rk
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Qccasional bends I
% Cleared/ Logged % Other (
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): ) , 5 r
Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate-(4 to 10 %) / Steep ( >10 %)
Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 57 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature bate
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environm�entallproressionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919 - 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
aw
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
SCGRE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
I
Presence of flow 1 persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
0
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
Ll
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
Li
extensive discharges = 0• no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
no discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max Dints
,V.
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 -4
0 -4
0 -2
�{
no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
Entrenchment 1 floodplain access
0_ 5
0_ 4
0— 2
96
(deeply_ entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max. points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
0
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
7e�
fine, homogenous = 0• large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
>0
dee l incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0 - 5
%
F„
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 —4
0-5
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed= x oints
.�
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 - 6
0-6
j
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
l
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max p pints
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
I i}
no evidence = 0• common, numerous types = max pints
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
d
no evidence =_O; common, numerous types = max points)
1'4
C
22
Presence of fish
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max oints
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max po ints
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 �lA�1sef�t
[lame: � � - f � t�< ProjectlSite:
Evaluator: P p - tva County:
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one)
Stream is at feast intermittent Ephemeral 6termitten Perennial
if z 19 ar perennial if?: 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= 1
Absent
Weak
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
1
ripple -pool sequence
1
0 18. Fibrous roots in streambed
i 4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
f1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
9. Grade control
0
0.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
11. Second or greater order channel
1.5
to = 0
a artificial ditches are not rated see discussinn. in ^�s^ �1
1.5
0.5
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
01
14. Leaf litter
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
o
IT Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No
C. Biology (Subtotal = f- i
1
0 18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
19. Rooted upland plants In streambed
If 20, Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
22. Fish
0
2.3. Crayfish
0
24. Amphibians
0
25. Algae
4
26- Wetland plants in streambed
3
'Perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 f manual.
Notes: r � ( :_ �,,_ , ) ` - - r , r. I
/, ` �.�' 7,, , . .
Sketch:
J(.tr
Latitude: 36- )oc�
Longitude: /r.
Other 4rdu a1-4 $
e.g. Quad Name:
Moderate
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
I 1
Yes = 3
Strong
(�
3,,
0
3
3
3
1.5
1
2
_Ji
1
2
3
0 -5
0
0.5
�1
1,5
0.5
1
1.5
0
-
- -1
%
1
0
2
1
0
1
2
3
1
2
3
0,5
1
1.5
0.5
1
1.5
0,5
1
1.5
0.5
1 I
1.5
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other= 0

USACE AID#
aL]'r'L�
Site # (indicate on attached map)
F , ■. t _ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: 4/t E- F_-P 2. Evaluator's name:..
3. Date of evaluation: ` k 4. Time of evaluation: _
5. Name of stream: 6. River basin: itle;�G
7. Approximate drainage area-. I S. Stream order: 0
9. Length of reach evaluated: 369 1Q. County: &- �*,A-
11. Site coordinates (if known): 40- a V V _ 1 - 12, Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): ✓l._ E
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit: - , 1.1 — Ad "I
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: /Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters '—/ Water Supply Watershed.
1$, is there a pond or take located upstream of the evaluation point? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: Ar
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? NO 20. hoes channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? /fE51 NO �
21. Estimated watershed land use: 1.0 %'Residential % Commercial % Industrial Al %u Agricultural
ff -10% Forested
22. Bankfull width: 4 9
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Strat� Occasional bends
% Cleared 1 Logged %u Other t
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2.
Gentle (2 to 47/.)-,
Frequent meander
Moderate (4 to 10 %a)
Very sinuous
Steep (,10 %0)
Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate farm used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 104 representing a stream of the highest quality.
17
Total Score (from reverse): v Comments:
Ir.VUa..f i�+G -C� 4 +rr.�f�d d— � •..� f rL.,, .,�....1 J�' P >lnae �a +r%.� ,_,.....�✓•'
Evaluator's Signature d Date I c'`' _
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmentalrofessionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06103. To Comment, please cal 1919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
EGOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow I persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
— -
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
r!
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max
points)"l
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
f
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max poi nts
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0 -4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0 - 4
0-4
no discharge = 0• springs, sees wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 - 4
0-2
no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
Entrenchment 1 floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max p oints
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
C
extensive channelization = 0` natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
fine, homogenous = 0• large diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
�.
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
i 3
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
I4
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
---�
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
r15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 -- 4
0-5
f
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle- pool/ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; wel[-developed = max points_
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
FA
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed_
0 -5
0--5
0 -5
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)_
.J _
1
Substrate embeddedness
NA
0-4
0 - 4
(deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max oints
;,
01
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
0
22
Presence of fish
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
,,�
b
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: I d-
Project/Site :6&1
Latitude: 36,1q g 7 3
Evaluator; ;'1' rtl
County: DU - I,,
Longitude:
>f-
Total Points:
Stream is at feast intermittent (�
Stream Determin ' circle one)
Ephemeral nteT!!en Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
iii' 19 or perennial rf > 30' / i
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = i? 1
Absent Weak
Moderate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
2
3
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
Q
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
()
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
(TW
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
('101x'
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Yes = 3
$ artificial ditches are not rated; see discuss ns in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = i )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
/1;3
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
r`y
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
CvI
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
(9w
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es
G. Biology (Subtotal = q 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
l'
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
(2,/
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
A
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
Q
1
2
3
li 22. Fish
1 0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0 -5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
- 0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
!
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:

1 1, \t l W) C)w,() 4 Site" lindlcate kilt attached IlIal/I
M
STREAM QUALITY ASSLSSMENTWORKSHEET t:
I"rmitie Ilie frrlloi%inlj info rnlattion for the stresrrn reach tinder as%essaal ell I: ,
1. 1p1,11Ca III 'r nanIC W( t L p ?. l v-aaluator's nanit .
3. Daleol'naluation: - � .° = rl�t~d 4.1tineurevaluation-
5. Nainv t)f sti-van1 1 r• ,b — uT- 6. River hasul __Cvf_ �rV-
\pl1rrr\nnaIc drainage arca: N. Stream order:O
N. 1 enLlh of realch evalunled' ravA 1
11. tin,: cooidinales 111 kno+" +,rill j1h:1c1 11+ de,111131 JgICes 12. tiuhtllvmon name ! of and t
C alalat,ld re +.I 1'71'1. Co- /� I tr11g11trtlt: rei '' ddr +nt I, V - 7
\It11,,,J 4":'l d' el- IT]IIICd Ii. at. Ik Y I I' Iul,too shred 1 lrlhtr 1. \ellall l'huu,r t,I� rlhc a starer
13. 1 1'Il.lntall Of reaih Model' Cl lalifAtYt (note nearby road, Lind landmafil •. �tlltl all�li It111p 1dC11Slld mL itrealiiw+I location
14. Proposed chaanncI st or'i, t I l anti } a'/Cltt P
Ic. 1 {ccelll ddeatlacr cundlti.lns v D 1 _ , , u i +;f ; tic L, -�
16. ,+11e conditi)n, at tanle 4 Y visit
I -. IdentIIs an\d spertaI %% ater% +ag classifications knosvta Section 111 Tidaal 11 ,ter, I ssential I'isheric'. IIallllaai
i ruin Pr titer, Owsla ildial'-, Resource "awn Nutrient Sc-ta,llly \k atcrs %k, ,ides Supph VIwmershed l 1-1V I
18, Is there a pond or lake located upstrearo orille evaluation poinl" 1 I 1 `.1 a 11 \es. estimate the tvaler surface area
11). Does channel appeaar on t 'SGS quad nlaap:' )'[:S 1( 1 20. Does channel appear tin L''SDA Sod :Starve\" N I ti
21. 1 shiliaied %% alcrshed Bind tase- Qn Residemial _ °`ot:'ornmercial o Industra,al Agriculltalal
Forested _ °'n Cleared I kq:t!cd �"''n ( )tllcr l M
Hankiull n idtia 23. B ak height I II,an1 bed it, toll of h;utk 1
24. Choisuwl ,lopc dtrtdal center of stream Flat 011,1211`.i _Gentle f, (o 4',,s lvtodcrslte (•I to 10°„) titce,p B It > "ol
_15. t °hanttc l ,inuosit\ atr w-hi a )ccasionaal hellds frequent meander _Ver't ,Inutrus lit. laded Challftcl
Instructions for completaon ttf t5nrksbovel Ilrtt`altud on paagt• ' -I: lie -In hY dviternlimta'k' the 111t7st .11?111tt1 mill: vfo „rCL'n7n hosed ,err
Ittdtlllkin, terrain. ve.._`rtalloll, rtrvall7 cI;1, rlit;air„II CtL I \er, characterl!tttc must he wored using the 'road.• eetlrC'pon 'Assign pkmstl
It'” e;k.h 0mraeterls IC tdnilln 111e till tl'w ecorcoon. Page ti provides it brie! desciiplion of llt,td 1t) re41r44 tilt:
characteristics identified to Ole workslrcel Score-; Owuld rellect an overall a.sscssnlcnt of -the stream reach under evaluation. If a
tha[ractervoic cannot be v% aloatedi d'ue 1st site or weather ctoji,htions,. enter 0 in the scoritiv hox and provide atn v \plranaatann in tilt"
,omnent +cction. Where there are oh\ IoUS change, ill the lh,lractel 1+1 .t (ream under re%ic%% le.g.. (Ile Ntreanl Ill,dd, Irons a pasture
into a I`orestl. the stream may he dal Ideal into smaller rcacho tftal diNpla!, more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
re.11.h the ltlial ,cure assigned to a stream reach Ittaa.rt range between U and 100, lvith a score of 1110 representing a %neanl Of 1110
111 he <t a11N.t111\. +
Trtlal Score (frown reverse): 7 C-raannIVIIII\: d (�', !,°� tL,CA P -tools
f.t.afuaatur'4 Sismaturl: r `� [hats: ll G^
[his channel ct aluatiou form is iaatended to be used onli as a guide to .assist landaawners and cos eonanentaal professiotalais ill
2 athcriw,? Ihr data required hr (lac 11niled States rout► Corps of Engincers to make at I)rchminar► assessment t1f vtrc.aln
t{uahtd- 'I hr amid scare resulting from (lie cmuple itan (if llli% form is subject tea U%ACE approval and does not imply a
1larticular ill il!aation ratio or r•etluirement_ I orm ,rrt,ieer to) ,la.tn r - verwl,lo f)Pt 0 : I,a t. t,tllanent. 1',Irase caall tli� $'i +- s•1 l l _'t,

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT'+d1ORKSHEET
ti('[ RFt
3
3
'7
3
a
a
3
Y
0
d
U
50
EC'[)REGION 1'[�l;�iT RANGV
CHARACTERISTICS
iiI(`4
Coastal
Piedmont
1'Coo111ain
1
Presence of f1m% ' persistent pools in stream
fl -5
(I -S
it -�
(no Ilow tit saturdtton 0 strong flow max points)
1=vAerace of past human alteration
0-6
(extensive alteration - 0, no alteration = max poinl,0
Riparian zone
0- t7
0 1
is -
(no buffer - (1; contiguous- wide bolder - max polniti!
d
E id en cc of nutrient or chemical discharkex -- — - - -
- -- -- -- - -
(l
-
1 L!\tcn-,k c disclt:lrl�.cs 0; fit) dischare-Gs, Lila\ points)
i
Groundwater discharge
(,1- i
I) --1
(no discharge It: springs. wcps. v4ellalncl4, etc ma\ point,;)
- --
fi,
Presence of adjacent flood plain
D-4
II - -1
V.1 -
(110 1100dl)IM11 I) f\1tinsIVC 1100dPIJ111. In.lx points)
Entrenchment flondplain access
0 - 5 5
(
deepk entienche� 1) frequent f oding ma\ polnts
Presence of adjacent wetlands
(no wetlands lt, lame adjacent wellands max points)
—
l
Channel slnuosily �
(e\ienso c channeli /ahon 11: 11,31W Al Meander 1114\ polnls)
I()
Sediment input
tl 5
() 1
U 1
lemensive dcflosition 0. little or no sediment maN po +lofts I
Size & diversit► of channel bell sul)xtrale
( line:. IIo no; enous 0. large, diverse tie; : • n0\ 1101111s)
1
F%idenee of c)lasoitcl ineisintl t11 ti) idcninl!
i) _
11-
(deeply Incised - 0. .table bed& bank, nla\ points) d
13
Presence oaf major bank failures
(severe crosion - 0: no erosion, stable bank-, n1ax points)
1.1
Row depth and density on banks
-
(110 VIN1111C RIMS I}, dense roots 6'routghow ma\ 110intti)
I� 15
Impact by agriculture, lk cstuck, or timber production
(1 - 4
1)
I tNubslanital Impact (1; no evidence ntalx points)
It,
Presence of riffle- rit"Wripple -pool complexes
0- 3
I) _ 5
(1 - ft
(wee rillles'ripples or pools 0: wc11- developed Ina\ points) '
1
I Iabitaticomplexit}' �
{) _ fi
tl - h
l7 - 6
( little of no habitat 0. frequent, varied habit,•1rs - max points)
1
Canopy cov'ereatV ovcr streambed
I) �
1) -
(t - . s
(no shading v'egetallon 0, conllnUOUS Cdtll)p+ 111,1X Point%)
®
+�
tillhstrale coo bedded ness
NFL°
t) - -1
tdcepl� embedded (I, loose structure marl �
20
Presence of stream in) crlchrates (see page .11
(no e\idence l); common. nu111c.rMIN typs:x - max points)
Presence o'f ;am phibians
(no evtdence f}: c<,Ir1111on. numuroos types = Inax poilINI
„
Prey live of fish
-
(no ex idenee (I. ,ninon- ntuncrow, types - ntax polntsl
L. 1dence (of wildlife use
11 0
-
tnO lvlJCnLC 0, abllltdant L:\ ide'nce max poinis)
To(al Points Possible
100
11111
100
TOTAL SCORE. (also Cnler on lira Page)
• I -hose characierlslICS a1tl not assessed in Lo,isi,ol tiirc:lwl
ti('[ RFt
3
3
'7
3
a
a
3
Y
0
d
U
50

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 1,h )3 r. (' p 46W
Date: _ �� I q ProjecVSite: 6A IL Latitude:
r
Evaluator: 40, 4 x 60', County: � Longitude: P6. C j
Total Points` : Stream Determination (circle one) Other �10,sr "'4rfj
Stream is at least intermittent l
if z 19 or perennial if a 34' Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology {Subtotal = 1� J 1
Absent
1a Continuity of channel iced and bank
0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
3. In- channel structure: ex, riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
5. Active/relict floodplain
4
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
24, Amphibians
8, Headcuts
0
9. Grade control
0 f
10. Natural valley
0 j
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =1,
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
C. Biology (Subtotal= �! }
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
y%
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
!� 0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
22. Fish
, 0
23. Grayfash
0
24, Amphibians
I 0
25. Algae
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods, See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
Weak
1
1
1
1
1.
1 f
0.5
0.6
1
0.5
0.5
Moderate
2
(2)
0
2
Cf)
2
2
2
1
Yes = 3
Strong
"IV, 1
3 1
3
Ct
(V
3
3
11.5
0.5 o
( 1.5
1
(es
2 1 0
2 i 0
1 2 3
' 2 3
0.5 1 1.5
0.5 1 1.5
0.5 1 1.5
0.5 1 1.5
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
J
1

USACE AID# DWQ 4 Site J# (indicate on attached map)
no STREAM +QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
r
Provide the fallowing information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: 2, Evaluator's name;' „”
- f
3. Date of evaluation: t1litI1 tl 4. Time of evaluation.
5. Name of stream: ��r G1„ Liar 6 t� 6. River basin: Out. SE
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order
9. Length of reach evaluated: loo, 10. County: P.,,'w+fi"
11, Site coordinates (if known): 36 • N76 , � TV 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): 0904
15. Recent weather conditions;■ Mr {0
r a
16. Site conditions at time of visit: /t,.r . ell) ( Mine
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ,Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters V Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -[V)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USES quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? Yo NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: to % Residential %n Commercial % Industrial 5--No Agricultural
60 % Forested ,7 % Cleared 1 Logged % Other l
22. Bankfull width: � 1 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: flat (0 to 2 %) Gentle (2 to 4 %) / Moderate (4 to 10 %0) Steep ( >I0 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander v Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 7J Comments;
Evaluator's Signature ✓ 1'-� Date i +` - I -' -f �
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919 -876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
�
CHARACTERISTICS
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
_1
1
Presence of flow 1 persistent pools in stream
0-5
-
0-5
!�
no flow or saturation = 0• strong flow = max points)
Evidence of past human alteration
0 -6
0 -5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max pints
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
t�
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0 - 4
0-4
extensive dischares = 0; no discharges = max poi nts
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
no discharge = 0• springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max points
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0- 4
0- 4
0- 2
f
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)
C"
Entrenchment 1 floodplain access
0 - 5
0-4
0 - 2
z
�
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0- 2
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max oints
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
l 1
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA"
0-4
0 -5
c{
fine, homogenous = 0; lame diverse sizes = max
points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
C
severe erosion = 0. no erosion, stable banks = max points)
W
e�
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
17
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
rA
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 -5
(} -4
0 -5
lr
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
Presence of riffle - pool /ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0 5
0-6
16
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
i�
Habitat complexity
0 -6
0 -6
0 -6
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
M
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 - 4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
u►
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0 - 4
0-4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
a
2 2
Presence of fish
0-4
0 - 4
0 - 4
n o evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max points
f,l
23
H
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 - 5
0 - 5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max
points)r
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
=r'!
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Forth Version 4.11 of -�
Date: r Ali {iii ProjectfSite: 13,j4,1, '„ (jeet Latitude: r� � /
Evaluator: rnl+ypJ .,,,., County. 17" V - 'Vl Longitude: �73 7
Total Points: I Stream Deteyrrtinatiert- circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral: Intermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
if 2:19 or perennial if a 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ?'S )
Absent
Weak
p 1g Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
�,
Ste/
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
(}
5- Active /relict floodplain
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
rg1
1
7 Recent alluvial deposits
_4
1
8. Headcuts
1
[ 9. Grade control?
0.
10. Natural valley
0
_ 0 5_)
11. Second or greater order channel
- -- -
Ni = 0-
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1
f 13. iron oxidizing bacteria 0 (Fi
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0- ct .05
16, Organic debris lines or piles L 0--) 0.5
17. Soil - based evidence of high water table? No = 0
G. Biology (Subtotal = L' 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed N
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed t"
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) l7.
21. Aquatic Mollusks Q.
22- Fish 0'
23. Crayfish 0
[ 24. Amphibians 0
25- Algae '0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
-perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Moderate Strong
2 3
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
Yes =3
(2)
2
0.5
1
1
Yest = 3
2 1
2 1
1 2
1 2
0.5 1
0.5 1
0.5 1
0.5 1
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
Sketch; Ajja t r.1cZ tar�.~t1.� M „y. AR c) s- �,. )( 1011,1 r�:,,,�1 C�••r 1,
�9J'u.tsr �coWnS�rr «r^ J!
3
3
3
3
3
3
1.5
1.5
3
3
0
1.5
1.5
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
t _ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET ,;
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: _
1. Applicant's name: IV C-C it 17 2. Evaluator's name: V Of k ski A %L(9 -Im
3. Date of evaluation;_ ! ! `� 4. Time of evaluation: _
5. Name of stream: l` 6. River basin: + r 4S t-
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order.
9. Length of reach evaluated: x 10. County: 0 G ` LIV
11. Site coordinates (if known): - ! 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): •4-.0 r
15. Recent weather conditions: ✓' td + --- x k 4Ny. -. t4 1 <
16. Site conditions at time of visit: '-I �. --. - r z. - d f N., 1
1.7. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential f=isheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters ISsnt Se � ( I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES f yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES�N�' 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES CV
21. Estimated watershed land use: %u Residential %n Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
014 Forested
% Cleared 1 Logged
% Other (
22. Bank-full width: 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: fat (ii to 2% Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to I U °,U) Steep (>I 0,%)
25. Channel sinuosity: g t Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score
y (fro +m reverse): y N Comments:
Gi l "C R - ° Fi �W- M-t'k Y • A- JrA J ! o 5 d YK- a- F - k
Evaluator's Signature { - -Date` r C `J
This channel evaluation forth is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTIC'S
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow f persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0• strong flow = max points
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0, no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
/1
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0 - 4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max po ints
-
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
no discharge = 0; springs. sees wetlands, etc. = max points)
U
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0--4
0- 2
no floodplain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)
Entrenchment 1 floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0- 2
1
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max
points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
V
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0--4
0 -- 4
extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
I 1
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
1'
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 5
0-5
r-
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
F
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
] 5
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
f
substantial im act =0; no evidence = max
points)
[
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
no riffles/ripples, or pools, = 0; we][-developed = max points)
l
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 - 6
0-6
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0 - 5
0-5
0 - 5
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 -4
0 -5
0 -5
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0 - 4
0-4
�]
Q
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max
points)f/
"4
4
22
Presence of fish
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: lZ /11.liq ProjectiSite: ,,,44.1.
Evaluator: -�` f County:�r�.yry
Total Points: ' �+
Stream is at least intermittent Stream Deter i ' circle one)
if z 19 orpefennial if? 30' Ephemeral, ntermittent erenniaf
A. Geomorpholopv {Subtotal = 1 i )
Absent
Weak
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3. In- channel structure: ex- riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
a`1
ripple -pool sequence
?,b)
1'
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
L
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0)
1
7_ Recent alluvial deposits
0
13
8. Headcuts
0
1
9. Grade control
0
10. Natural valley
0
a .5
11. Second or greater order channel
_
11 artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions In manual
B. Hydrology {Subtotal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
13. Irons oxidizing bacteria
0
1
14. Leaf litter
15
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
G. Biology (Subtotal = ' y
Strang
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
10
21. Aquatic Mollusks
' 0)
1 22, Fish
ro
23. Crayfish
?,b)
24. Amphibians
D
25. Algae
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
1.5
- perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Yes = 3
Sketch:
Latitude: �0'-S
Longitude:
!Other jrA
e.g. Quad Name:
Moderate
Strang
2
3�)
li'2 )
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
1
1.5
1
1.5
Yes = 3
r2 3
2 3
51 0
r.5
1 1.5
es =3
R
{? 1 0
2 1 0
1 2 3
1 2 3
0.5 1 1.5
0.5 1 1.5
0.5 1 1.5
0.5 1 1.5
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0

USAGE AID# DWQ #1 Site # (indicate on attached map)
4'
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET ,
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: �,X i 12 2. Evaluator's name: vtw l -vl A vs A�-
3. Date of evaluation: k-.) ld 4. Time of evaluation: 1Z • 4
S. Name of stream: � � ^'�* C�ct r: 1`�G' 6. River basin: �Jt -Se
7. Approximate drainage area: J k c— •s 8. Stream order:!
9. length of reach evaluated: C 10. County:
11, Site coordinates (if known): � -S I - 12. Subdivision name (if any):.
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): r-
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters utrient Sensi s ter Su 1 W ed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO if yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES R 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential %n Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
r`r501/6 Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other i
22. Banlcfull width: = 23. Hank height (from bed to top of bank:):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) /' Gentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %Q) Steep ( >10 %a)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander vl"' Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scares should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream [nay
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): ( 1 Comments:
c, - S-� -e..— P
Evaluator's Signature } ' ) Date , I- Al - d- dl-
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to snake a preliminary ,assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USAACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103. To Comment, please call 919 -876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT' WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SC©
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow 1 persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0° contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0 5
0-4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0 — 4
0-4
no discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 4
0 —4
0— 2
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)
7
Entrenchment 1 floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
0.
(dee2ly entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
f
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0 — 4
0-2
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max poi nts
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive deposition= 0• little or no sediment = max points)
ri i
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0 —4
5
0 — 5
fine, . homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 —4
0-5
,�.
(deeply incised = 0• stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 — 5
0-5
w
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints
WRoot
14
depth and density on banks
0-3
0 - 4
0-5
F,
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
4
substantial impact =0• no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle- poot/ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0, well-developed = max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 _ b
0-6
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
i
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
t,
x
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
4•'
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0; common numerous types = max points)
V►
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0 - 4
0-4
�+
C7
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points)
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0 — 4
0-4
-
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max Dints
231
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11`
Date:
Project/Site: I j €�,l Q f r ee k _
Latitude:
-3(_ � (�
(
Evaluator; ,
County:
9"6w
Longitude; f (
Y anti,
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determ° on (circle one)
Ephemeral i ermi± erennial
Other
e.g. Quad
ame
if a 19 or perennial if a 30"
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
r3
f 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
(1
2
3
f 3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
r
2
3
ripple -pool sequence
j
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1 `
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
2
3 f
5. Depositional bars or benches
(6)
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
(9
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
C2)
3
{ 9. Grade control
(V
05
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
Yes = 3
s artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
60 �
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
(01)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
t
15. Organic debris lines or piles
0
( 3)
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yeo _ A
C. Biology (Subtotal = }
18- Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1 2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
('3 _ -"
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
�9
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
_0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0?
0 -5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0)
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
j
0.5
1
1 -5
25. Algae
0)
0.5
1
1 -5
25_ Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes.
Sketch:

Mir-
USAGE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
Y 4
t t STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET AQP
Provide the fallowing information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: QC 1 - 'V.P 2. Evaluator's name.
J �
3. Date of evaluation: 1 j/111 14 4. Time of evaluation: I E w
5. Name of stream: • tom V 6.. River basin: Neu -tt
7. Approximate drainage area: • c,c e5 8. Stream order
9. Length of reach evaluated: d 10. County: �w
11. Site coordinates (if known): 69- 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying streams) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): rli a
15. Recent weather conditions: Z" 1 .4 -y -'r,
f
16. Site conditions at time of visit: P-1
r r-
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutlt<ent Sensiti.y ers 1,t[oier Supply aters d (1 4V)
18. Is there a pond or Cake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 'NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 20. Does channel el appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: %w Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
t6V% Forested %n Cleared / Logged % Other f
22. Bankfull width:
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: St t �1 Occasional bends
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3
Gentle (2 to 40 /A�,,f''r Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep (> 10%)
Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
0 — 174-.0--1
Evaluator's Signature i rt,. Date r�rl
This channel evaluation form is inten(Xe&t-d be us tt only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the.tnited States Army Corps of 'Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USAGE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. form subject to change -- version 06103. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2
SCORE
L-�
Z
6
6
V
Z
I
"f
z
N,
C
ice. -I
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow 1 persistent pools in stream
0-5
4 , 4
0 5
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
Riparian zone
0-6
0 - 4
0-5
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0 e 4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
no floodplain = 0• extensive floodplain = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0 -4
0 -2
a"
(deeply entrenched = 0- frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0- 4
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
1 l
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
Fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
l4
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 4
0-5
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max oints
-
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle - pool /ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
e�
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 - 6
0-6
little or no habitat = 0; fre uent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
1
Substrate embeddedness
NA
0-4
0 - 4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
no evidence = 0• common, numerous types = max Points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0 - 4
0-4
g
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max points)
Q
22
Presence of fish
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
l00
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2
SCORE
L-�
Z
6
6
V
Z
I
"f
z
N,
C
ice. -I

a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = / , 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form
Version 4.11
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
Data: iZ lr�l�d
ProjectJSite:
1 15. Sediment on plants or debris
Latitude:
C
Evaluator: ,,,�, J
Cownty: ,rte
Longitude: `f i _jg3q
Total Points;
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream De #e
(circle one)
Other
dd
ir? 99 croerennial if? 30' '
Ephemeral
Perennial
e g quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = It l
Absent
Weak
Moderate Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
t
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step - pool,
0
1
22, Fish
3
ripple -pool sequence
1
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2 ,
3
5. ActiveiM W fl cod plain
0
1
2'
3
5. Depositional bars or benches
0
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
('11j
2
3
8. Headcuts
L77
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1 5
10. Natural valley
0
_
'
_
1
1 5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0 )
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = / , 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
!`0;
1
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
{ 1-)
0.S
1 15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
C
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
i?.5
0 _
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No
= 0
Yes= 3 }
C. Biology (Subtotal= C 1
18. Fibrous roots in stream bed
3
(2
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
37
2
1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
22, Fish
0
0.5
1
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1 f
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
25. Algae
0
0.5
1 f
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
3
3
0
1.5
1.5
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

USAGE AID# -- - UWQ # -- -- — - Site # (indicate on attached map)
t _ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: le 2. Evaluator's name : 4vao
3. Date of evaluation: It 11114 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: iw�l- `� f • — b. River basin: z 'Sf.
7. Approximate drainage area: 7 acr -� 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: 10 10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): ti
15. Recent weather conditions: V, M 3 A.7 ,,r
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Qrj A C-44 , crl% -y
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters N tt%rien Sensitive W s Wat�rsupply Water ed 17 (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YA 10 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on 11SGS quad map? YES 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21, Estimated watershed land use: %° Residential
b46 Forested
22. Bankfull width: { ''
% Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
Cleared l Lagged % Other f
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank) :'
24. Channel slope dawn center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4 %) y,/'� Moderate (4 to 10 %fl) Steep (>I0 %)
25. Channel sinuosity. Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander /° Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's Signature � L_ Date � �_A I. i
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 46103. To Comment, please call 919 -876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT 'WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow 1 persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0; strong, flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0 -6
0-5
0 -5
,-
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0- contiguous wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
no discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max oints
U
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 - 4
0-2
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)
7
Entrenchment 1 floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0 4
0-2
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0 - 5
0-4
0 -4
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
(fine, homogenous = 0• large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0 - 5
7
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
E "
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0 - 5
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0 - 5
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max oints
I 5
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
substantial impact =0• no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle- pool/ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0 -- 5
0-6
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; we] l- develo ed = max points)
1
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 - 6
0-6
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
Canopy coverage over streambed
1 8
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max
0 - S
0-5
points)
0 - 5
y
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 -4
✓
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0 - 5
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max
points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
C�
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max oints
Q
22
Presence of fish
0 -4
0 -4
0 -4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max points)
�
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
I
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
I00
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
{ f
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form 'Version 4.11 ��
-�
Date: I2� # r f +� Project/Site: `f A 1 4 t e r <� �[ Latitude: 6. 7
Evaluator: � � � ,{ � NWn County: 1,r ­0 Longitude:
Total Paints: I Stream Determination (circle one) Other 0(re -p.-,a
Stream is at least intermittent r1, Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial e.g. quad Name:
if a 19 or perennial if ? 30" p'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= l
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
-,
L-'
2
3
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
4
(1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
('1
2
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
l 07
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0 5 -1
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Na= O)
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = y }
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
'17
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1 5
1
�0.5 -
0
15 sediment on plants or debris
0ti.
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
5_.
1
1.5
17. Sail -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3�
C. Biology (Subtotal
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
//
! 2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
- 0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0,75.
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: ... .
Sketch:

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
t , STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT 'V WORKSHEET
ir
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Pt - t C 0") 2. Evaluator's name: Af tia 1-,.,
3. Date of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: 1-t
7. Approximate drainage area:
9. Length of reach evaluated:
11. Site coordinates (if known):
4. Time of evaluation: _
6. River basin:
8. Stream order: d
)0- 10. County: J) -4 - Ll
S 12. Subdivision name (if any):
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Woo- ¢-
l5, Recent weather conditions: A­i - 4 I (' `l 4 ,if
16. Site conditions at time of visit: i o t ) � -
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters tiut-ne—ni­`§e_n_sZD Waters Wat=jgl Waters d (I-lv)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 0 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES C 1 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural
(+3',( le Forested % Cleared 1 Logged % Other (
22. Bankfull width: j j 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): I T
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4 %) ­1 Moderate (4 to 10 %) Steep (>I0 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to
each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics
identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot
be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where
there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may
be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned
to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality.
`r �
Total Score (from reverse); 'I Comments:
Evaluator's Signature }� Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environments {{ professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USAGE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103. To Comment, please call 919 -876 -8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2
4�
G/
v
c
3
I
3
3
J
3
I
V
1♦
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow 1 persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
Clip flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0_ 6
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0
4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
—4
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
Vno
discharge = 0• springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max points)
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 4
0— 4
0— 2
y„
no flood lain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
7
Entrenchment 1 floodplain access
0-5
o-4
0-2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0— 2
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max poi ntsj
4
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
I 1
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 - 5
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
(de e ply incised = 0; stable bed & 'banks = max points)
F*
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
a
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 4
0-5
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
Un
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max point s
16
Presence of riffle- pooUripple -pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max points)
[�
d
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
Canopy coverage over streambed
1$
0 -5
0-5
0 5
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0-5
no evidence = 0• common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0 - 4
0-4
G
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
0.4
Q
22
Presence of fish
0--4
0--4
0 -4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max points)
H23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 - 5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
l00
l00
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2
4�
G/
v
c
3
I
3
3
J
3
I
V
1♦

Mitigation Project Name
EEP IMS ID
River Basin
Cataloging Unit
Buffalo Creek
92603
NEUSE
03020201
Applied Credit Ratios:
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
NCDOT Pre -EEP Debits (feet and acres): Not Applicable
EEP Debits (feet and acres):
DWQ Permit No USACE Action IDs Impact Project Name
2005 -1701 2005 -20292 Brighton Forest
NCDOT TIP R- 2000CB / D / F /
1996 -0319 1997 -00885 G - Northern Wake Expressway .
NCDOT TIP U -2582B - Edwards
2000 -11281 1999 -21144 Mill Rd Extension
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 10:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 Various
"NOTE: Buffer breakdown:
Rural non - subject 30 - 100 feet 108,184.78 @ 5:1 = 21,637.16
100 - 200 feet 53,314.21 @ 10:1 = 5,331.42
Rural subject 30 - 100 feet 741,191.22 @ 10:1 = 74,119.12
100 - 200 feet 60,451.46 @ 20:1 = 3,022.57
963,141.67 sq ft = 104,110.27 credits
0.00
0.000
163,141.67
04,110.27
Information from EEP Debit Ledger dated 04/20/2015