Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSW5240101_Supplement-EZ Form_20240131 SUPPLEMENT-EZ COVER PAGE FORMS LOADED PROJECT INFORMATION 1 Project Name Slier City WWTP Expansion 2 Project Area(ac) 55.26 3 Coastal Wetland Area(ac) 0 4 Surface Water Area(ac) 0.69 5 Is this project High or Low Density? Low 6 Does this project use an off-site SCM? No ;COMPLIANCE WITH 02H.1003(4) 7 Width of vegetated setbacks provided(feet) 30 8 Will the vegetated setback remain vegetated? Yes 9 If BUA is proposed in the setback,does it meet NCAC 02H.1003(4)(c-d)? N/A 10 Is streambank stabilization proposed on this project? j No ;NUMBER AND TYPE OF SCMs: 11 Infiltration System 12 Bioretention Cell 13 Wet Pond 14 Stormwater Wetland 15 Permeable Pavement 16 Sand Filter 17 Rainwater Harvesting(RWH) 18 Green Roof 19 Level Spreader-Filter Strip(LS-FS) 20 Disconnected Impervious Surface(DIS) 21 Treatment Swale 22 Dry Pond 23 StormFilter 24 Silva Cell 25 Bayfilter 26 Filterra FORMS LOADED DESIGNER CERTIFICATION `27 Name and Title: David Honeycutt, PE 28 Organization: McGill Associates 29 Street address: 5 Regional Circle,Suite A 30 City,State,Zip: Pinehurst,NC 28374 31 Phone number(s): 910-295-3159;910-690-2583 cell I 32 Email: david.honeycutt@mcgillassociates.com Certification Statement: I certify,under penalty of law that this Supplement-EZ form and all supporting information were prepared under my direction or supervision;that the information provided in the form is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,true,accurate,and complete;and that the engineering plans, specifications,operation and maintenance agreements and other supporting information are consistent with the information provided here. Designer ,,���itiei rerie///oi ••'�Q:"c-k CARp'- FICZ SEAS `_ Signature of Designer U34999 ) 2 Qs 0 Seal Date LOW DENSITY DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR LOW DENSITY PROJECTS FROM 02H.1003 1 Is project below density thresholds set forth in the applicable stormwater rule? Yes 2 Does project maximize dispersed flow and minimize channelization of flow? Yes 3 Has the use of piping been minimized per.1003(2)(c)? Yes 4 Side slopes of the vegetated conveyances(H:V) 2.5:1 5 Maximum velocity in the vegetated conveyances during the 10-year storm? 3.6 6 Are curb outlet swales proposed? No 7 Maximum longitudinal slope of curb outlet swale(s)(%) N/A 8 Bottom width of curb outlet swale(s)(feet) I N/A 9 Maximum side slope of curb outlet swale(s)(H:V) N/A 10 Minimum length of curb outlet swale(s)(feet) N/A 11 Are treatment swales used instead of curb outlet swales? No 12 Is stormwater released at the edge of the setback as dispersed flow? Yes 13 Have stormwater outlets been designed to prevent downslope erosion? I Yes 14 Are variations to rule.1003 proposed? No ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 15 Please use this space to provide any additional information about this low density project: The 25 year storm was used in the design of proposed swales.The maximum velocity is for the 25 year storm. Swales are designed as conveyance swales not treatment swales. Swales receive runoff from sheet flow. Drainage Pervious ' Swale Area BUA area C fl Slope V,,,,w V.,„„., Flow depth (ac) (ac) (cfs) (%) (fps) (fps) (ff) _ 1 0.69 0.07 0.62 0.44 2.48 3.40 4.50 3.28 0.55 2 0 14 l 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.17 5.83 4.00 1.14 0.12 3 0.11 0.02 j 0.09 0.35 22.81 4.30 5.00 5.10 0.67 4 i 1.39 0.31 1.08 0.36 4.03 7.77 4.00 3.00 0.56 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 DRAINAGE AREAS Is this a high density project? No 2 If so,number of drainage areas/SCMs N/A 3 Does this project have low density areas? Yes 4 If so,number of low density drainage areas 1 Is all/part of this project subject to previous rule 5 versions? No LCLICK TO LOAD FORM