Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWI0300123_Staff Report_20240118WQROS REGIONAL STAFF REPORT FOR UIC Program Support Permit No. WI0300123 Date: _01/18/2024 To: _WQROS, UIC Permitting Central Office Michael Rogers County: Union Permittee/Applicant: James Allen & Regina B. Lee Facility Name: _ James Allen & Regina B. Lee SFR L GENERAL INFORMATION 1. This application is (check all that apply): ❑ New ® Renewal ❑ Minor Modification ❑ Major Modification a. Date of Inspection: 01-17-2024 b. Person contacted and contact information: Mr. James Allen Lee (704) 289-2890 c. Site visit conducted by: Edward Watson and Maria Schutte d. Inspection Report Printed from BIMS attached: ❑ Yes ® No. e. Physical Address of Site including zip code: 900 Club Drive, Monroe, NC 28112 f. Driving Directions if rural site and/or no physical address: g. Latitude: 34.969854 Longitude:-80.517618 Source of Lat/Long & accuracy (i.e., Google Earth, GPS, etc.): IL DESCRIPTION OF INJECTION WELL(S) AND FACILITY 1. Type of injection system: ® Geothermal Heating/Cooling Water Return ❑ In situ Groundwater Remediation ❑ Non -Discharge Groundwater Remediation ❑ Other (Specify: 2. For Geothermal Water Return Well(s) only a. For existing geothermal system: Were samples collected from Influent/Effluent sampling ports? ® Yes ❑ No. Provide well construction information from well tag: Well tag data not collected. b. Does existing or proposed system use same well for water source and injection? ® Yes ❑ No If No, please provide source/supply well construction info (i.e., depth, date drilled, well contractor, etc.) and attached map and sketch location of supply well in relation to injection well and any other features in Section IV of this Staff Report. 3. Are there any potential pollution sources that may affect injection? ❑ Yes ® No What is/are the pollution source(s)? What is the distance of the injection well(s) from the pollution source(s)? N/A 4. What is the minimum distance of proposed injection wells from the property boundary? 5. Quality of drainage at site: ®Good ❑ Adequate ❑ Poor 6. Flooding potential of site: ® Low ❑ Moderate ❑ High Rev. 6/1/2015 Page 1 WQROS REGIONAL STAFF REPORT FOR UIC Program Support 7. For Groundwater Remediation systems, is the proposed and/or existing groundwater monitoring program (number of wells, frequency of monitoring, monitoring parameters, etc.) adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No. If No, attach map of existing monitoring well network if applicable and recommend any changes to the groundwater - monitoring program. N/A 8. Does the map included in the Application reasonably represent the actual site (property lines, wells, surface drainage)? ® Yes ❑ No. If No, or no map, please attach a sketch of the site. Show property boundaries, buildings, wells, potential pollution sources, roads, approximate scale, and north arrow. 9. For Non -Discharge groundwater remediation systems only: a. Are the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A. If no, please explain: b. Are the site conditions (soils, topography, depth to water table, etc.) consistent with what was reported by the soil scientist and/or Professional Engineer? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. If no, please explain: III. EVALUATIONAND RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes ® No. If yes, explain. 2. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules that you recommend to be included in the permit when issued. Make sure that you provide a reason for each special condition: Condition Reason 3. Recommendation ❑ Deny. If Deny, please state reasons: ❑ Hold pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office ❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information ® Issue 4. Signature of report preparer(s): Edward Watson 01/18/2024. DocuSigned by: Signature of WQROS Regional Supervisor: FA44" f/ N�-" Date: 1/18/2024 Rev. 6/1/2015 Page 2 WQROS REGIONAL STAFF REPORT FOR UIC Program Support IV. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS/ATTACHMENTS (If Needed) The water reported high turbidy at both the Influent and Effluent ports. Collected samples from both ports sent to DWR lab, sample IDs are AD16573 and AD16574. Sample results will be reported when they are available to permittee and CO. Rev. 6/1/2015 Page 3