NC0003425_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_19970219

VC``P&L i ` "DEC 1 6 2002
AM1gesfia'y Lmsan / �..;.
1c ti DIV. OF N ATER QUALITY
j f� DIRECTOR'S OFFICE
File: 520M
an Klimek, Director
orth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Subject: Progress Energy Roxboro Steam Electric Plant (NC0003425)
Proposed Biological Study Plans for 2003
Dear Mr. Klimek:
VgRn f �5SO
Cecil E. Ialaannd
Plant Manager
December 10, 2002
< i ..!
:i
DEC 2 0 2002
Enclosed is the biological monitoring study plan that Progress Energy proposes to conduct at
the Roxboro Steam Electric Plant (NC0003425) in 2003 as required by its NPDES permit. The
only requested change from the scheduled plan from last year is to discontinue the alternate -
year regime of cove rotenone sampling. This proposed biological monitoring study plan was
discussed with Ms. Trish MacPherson of your staff.
We intend to discontinue the voluntary fall sport fish study which was in place to assess the
recovery of the fishery in Hyco Reservoir. Mean selenium concentrations in common carp, the
last fish off the fish consumption advisory that was rescinded in 2001, have been below the
threshold limit for two years.
Progress Energy appreciates your reviewing this proposed study plan and providing us with
approval for its implementation. Please contact Ms. Robin Bryson at [phone] if we can
provide further information.
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the
person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering
the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility off nes and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Yours very truly,
vfl"V
Cecil Rowland
Roxboro Steam Plan Plant Manager
17DO Ounnaway Roao
Semora. NC 27343

ROXBORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
2003 Study Plan
PROGRAM FREQUENCY LOCATION
Water quality Alternate calendar months
(February, April, June, August,
October, December)
Water chemistry Alternate calendar months
(February, April, June, August,
October, December)
Phytoplankton' Alternate calendar months
(February, April, June, August,
October, December)
Chlorophyll a Alternate calendar months
(February, April, June, August,
October, December)
Zebra mussels Alternate calendar months
(February, April, June, August,
October, December)
Fisheries
Electrofishing Once every three calendar months
(March, June, September,
December)
Trace elements Once per calendar year (spring)
Stations 213, 313, 4B, 6B (surface to
bottom at 1-m intervals)
Stations 213, 3B, 411, 613 (surface)
Stations 2B, 3B, 4B, 6B
Stations 2B, 313, 4B, 613
Main intake structure or a water
quality station
Stations IA, 1C,2A,2C,3A,3C,
4A,4E,6A,6C
Transects 3 and 4
Roxboro --Changes from 2002 Study Plan
PROGRAM CHANGE
Cove rotenone Although cove rotenone fisheries sampling was scheduled for 2003 in the
altemate-year sampling regime, no sampling was scheduled.
'Phytoplankton samples will be collected and preserved but identified only if chlorophyll a concentrations are
equal to or greater than 40 µg/liter.

—,co Reservoir Sampling Locations
Ro;om Steam
Electric Plant g
--_'-
NORTH �OLJKA
0
r
i Discharge
r (Outfall 1100E
�' ♦`ram
i
r
r �
r
r h
�r 2 1 .
r
r'
' r
h% Person -Caswell
Lake Authority J
rr \\ Cobbs Creek
North Hyco Creek
Lake station designations South HYco Creek
at each transact number:
Station A on west side of lake
Station 8 in center of lake
Station C on east side of lake
Cane Creek
py all #003) 1,n
3
Afterbay
Reservoir
Site Dam
Intake Canal
RDry Ash Landfill
Ash Settling Pond
0 1 2 3
I I I t
IGlometers
0 1 2
Miles

2003 WATER QUALITY MONITORING VARIABLES
Temperature Conductivity
pH Secchi disk transparency
Dissolved oxygen
2003 WATER CHEMISTRY MONITORING VARIABLES
TOTAL ALKALINITY
NUTRIENTS
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
IONS
Total phosphorus
TURBIDITY
Chloride
Total nitrogen
TRACE ELEMENTS (TOTAL)
Sulfate
Nitrate -Nitrite
Arsenic
Calcium
Ammonia
Copper
Magnesium
Total organic carbon
Selenium
Sodium
2003 Water Quality and Water Chemistry —Changes from 2002 Study Plan
PROGRAM CHANGE
No change.
2003 TRACE ELEMENT PROGRAM SAMPLING SUMMARIES'
Roxboro
Station or Number'Station
Matrix Transect Tissue or Transect Total
Fish
bluegill
3,4 Muscle, liver
6
24
white catfish
3,4 Muscle, liver
6
24
largemouth bass
3,4 Muscle, liver
6
24
Sediment
3,4
3
6
Zooplankton
3,4
3
6
Benthos
3,4
5
10
2003 Trace Element Monitoring Program Variables —Changes from 2002
Study Plan
PROGRAM CHANGE
Roxboro fish —fall Based on the rescission of the fish consumption advisory at Hyco
Reservoir and the required post -rescission data for common carp (the last
species on the advisory) being below threshold level for selenium, the fall
special sport fish study trace element sampling was discontinued.
Numbers and sample size depend on availability,

Mr. Cecil E. Rowland
Plant Manager
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
1700 Dunnaway Rd
Semora, NC 27343
Dear Mr. Rowland:
MIChAet r. LAsiey, udveriii&
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Departmer vironment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek,P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
December 20, 2002
p�
U �nr,J9N,2��
Staff of the Division of Water Quality have received and reviewed the 2001 Environmental Monitoring
Report for the Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, as required by NPDES Permit (NC0003425). This report
concludes "favorable trends in key limnological variables, trace element concentrations, and populations
of aquatic organisms demonstrate that Hyco Reservoir has recovered from previous effects of selenium
bioaccumulation." DWQ agrees with this statement. Since the dry fly ash system has resolved the
selenium concerns, the fish consumption advisory was rescinded in August 2001.
DWQ staff believe that it is now time to turn attention to thermal issues/impacts. Water temperatures,
algal biomass data, electrofishing catch rates and fish diversity all indicate impacts at Transect 4 and to
some extent at Transect 6. DWQ would like to work with CPBL biologists during the next year to address
the extent of thermal impacts compared to impacts due to changes in habitat, and to explore ways to
better monitor possible thermal impacts. DWQ will contact Robin Bryson to set up an initial meeting.
With this is mind, we acknowledge receipt and approval of the biological monitoring study plan for 2003
for Hyco Reservoir. Your letter of December 10, 2002 indicates that you will discontinue all cove
rotenone fish sampling. You also will no longer be conducting the voluntary fall sport fish study because
the fish consumption advisory was rescinded in 2001.
Si rely,
Coleen H. Sul s, Chief
Water Quality Section
cc: Jimmie Overton,
Ken Schuster, RRO
Shannon Langley, Point Source Branch
Robin Bryson, CPBL
NCDENR
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mal Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

�'CPU
> Proareu Energy ::� -an
DEC 2002
DIV. OF 4YATER QUALITY
DIRECTOR'S OFFICE
File:UE520M
Ktran
l I
imek, Director
arolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality I
1617 Mail Service Center p
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 ��
l�
Subject: Progress Energy Roxboro Steam Electric Plant CNC0003425)
Proposed Biological Study Plans for 2003 -
Dear Mr. Klimek:
— VgRn p�Ssy � C�
Cecil E. Bo laannd
Plant Manager
December 10, 2002
Enclosed is the biological monitoring study plan that Progress Energy proposes to conduct at
the Roxboro Steam Electric Plant (NC0003425) in 2003 as required by its NPDES permit. The
only requested change from the scheduled plan from last year is to discontinue the alternate -
year regime of cove rotenone sampling. This proposed biological monitoring study plan was
discussed with Ms. Trish MacPherson of your staff.
We intend to discontinue the voluntary fall sport fish study which was in place to assess the
recovery of the fishery in Hyco Reservoir. Mean selenium concentrations in common carp, the
last fish off the fish consumption advisory that was rescinded in 2001, have been below the
threshold limit for two years.
Progress Energy appreciates your reviewing this proposed study plan and providing us with
approval for its implementation. Please contact Ms. Robin -Bryson at [phone] if we can
provide further information.
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the
person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering
the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Yours very truly,
' falej
Cecil Rowland
Roxboro Steam Punt Plant Manager
1700 Ounnamy Road
Somata. NC 27343

... ABORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLAtr j
2003 Study Plan
PROGRAM FREQUENCY LOCATION
Water quality Alternate calendar months
(February, April, June, August,
October, December)
Water chemistry Alternate calendar months
(February, April, June, August,
October, December)
Phytoplankton' Alternate calendar months
(February, April, June, August,
October, December)
Chlorophyll a Alternate calendar months
(February, April, June, August,
October, December)
Zebra mussels Alternate calendar months
(February, April, June, August,
October, December)
Fisheries
Electrofishing Once every three calendar months
(March, June, September,
December)
Trace elements Once per calendar year (spring)
Stations 2B, 313, 4B, 6B (surface to
bottom at 1-m intervals)
Stations 213, 313, 413, 6B (surface)
Stations 2B, 3B, 4B, 6B
Stations 2B, 3B, 4B, 6B
Main intake structure or a water
quality station
Stations IA, 1C, 2A, 2C, 3A, 3C,
4A, 4E, 6A, 6C
Transects 3 and 4
Roxboro —Changes from 2002 Study Plan
PROGRAM CHANGE
Cove rotenone Although cove rotenone fisheries sampling was scheduled for 2003 in the
altemate-year sampling regime, no sampling was scheduled.
'Phytoplankton samples will be collected and preserved but identified only if chlorophyll a concentrations are
equal to or greater than 40 µg/liter.

Hyco Reservoir Sampling Locations
- Roxboro Steam
Electric Plant
<NORTHOLINA
Cobbs Creek
i
t
i
r
I,r "K
North Hym Creek
Cane Creek
- DischatJ'e
LOutrall #003)
Person -Caswell .t
Lake Authority `
Afterbay
Reservoir
VMain
Dam
Intake Canal
RDry Ash Landfill
Ash Settling Pond
0 1 2 3
Lake station designations
South I I I I
HYm Creek IGlometers
at each transact number:
0 1 2
Station A on west side of lake
Station 8 in center of lake
Miles
Station C on east side of lake

2003 WATER QUALITY MONITORING VARIABLES
Temperature Conductivity
pH Secchi disk transparency
Dissolved oxygen
2003 WATER CHEMISTRY MONITORING VARIABLES
TOTAL ALKALINITY
NUTRIENTS
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
IONS
Total phosphorus
TURBIDITY
Chloride
Total nitrogen
TRACE ELEMENTS (TOTAL)
Sulfate
Nitrate -Nitrite
Arsenic
Calcium
Ammonia
Copper
Magnesium
Total organic carbon
Selenium
Sodium
2003 Water Quality and Water Chemistry --Changes from 2002 Study Plan
PROGRAM
CHANGE
No change.
2003 TRACE ELEMENT PROGRAM SAMPLING
SUMMARIES=
Roxboro
Station or
Number/Station
Matrix
Transect Tissue
or Transect
Total
Fish
bluegill
3,4 Muscle, liver
6
24
white catfish
3,4 Muscle, liver
6
24
largemouth bass
3.4 Muscle, liver
6
24
Sediment
3,4
3
6
Zooplankton
3,4
3
6
Benthos
3,4
5
10
2003 Trace Element Monitoring Program Variables —Changes from 2002 Study
Plan
PROGR.kNl
CHANGE
Roxboro fish --tall Based on the rescission of the fish consumption advisory at Hyco
Reservoir and the required post -rescission data for common carp (the last
species on the advisory) being below threshold level for selenium, the fall
special sport fish study trace element sampling was discontinued.
'Numbers and sample size depend on availability.

William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Fivironment and Natural Resources
December 7, 2001
Mr. Cecil Rowland, Manager
CP&L, A Progress Energy Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
1700 Dunnaway Rd
Semora, NC 27343
Dear Mr. Rowland:
Gre Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
We have received, reviewed and approve the biological monitoring study plan for 2002 for the Roxboro
Steam Electric Plant (NC0003425). Your letter of November 26, 2001 indicates that you will discontinue
sampling for total solids and total suspended solids, and will discontinue sampling for the trace elements
aluminum, cadmium, and mercury based on consistently low measurements. In addition, because the
fish consumption advisory has been removed, you intend to drop sampling for bluegill and largemouth
bass at Transect 2, and to drop sampling for white catfish at Transects 2 and 6.
Sincerely,
1 -
Coleen H. Sullins, Chief
Water Quality Section
cc: Jimmie Overton
Ken Schuster, RRO
NLDEP:R
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

�1r—, �kv�(Or
O � <
5080
Mr. Steven Conner
CP&L - Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
1700 Dunnaway Road
Semora, NC 27343-
SUBJECT: Corrected Certificate
Dear Mr. Conner:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Df ent of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
June 14, 2002
Enclosed is a corrected certificate that includes the proper designation as "Field
Parameters Only". The previous certificate and attachment should be discarded and
replaced with the enclosed copies. Please review this certificate to insure that your
laboratory is certified for all parameters required to properly meet your certification needs.
Contact us at 919-733-3908, if you have questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Chief, Laboratory Section
Enclosure
cc: James W. Meyer
Connie U. Brower
Raleigh Regional Officetr-
Laboratory Section N. C. Division of Water Quality 1623 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1623
FAX: [phone] Internet: www.esb.enr.state.nc.usAab
Ad A
NCDENR
[phone]

Attachment I
North Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification FIELD PARAMETERS ONLY
Certified Parameters Listing
Lab Name: CP&L - Roxboro Steam Electric Plant Certificate Number: 5060
Address: 1700 Dunnaway Road Effective Date: 06/05/2002
Semora, NC 27343- Expiration Date. 12/31/2002
Date of Last Amendment:
The above named laboratory, having duty met the requirements of ISA NCAC 2H.0800, is hereby certified for the measurement of the parameters listed below.
CERTIFIED PARAMETERS
INORGANICS
RESIDUAL CHLORINE
Std Method 4500 Cl G
pH
Std Method 4500 H B
TEMPERATURE
Std Method 2550E
This certification requires maintance of an acceptable quality assurance program, use of approved methodology, and satisfactory performance on evaluation samples. Laboratories are
subject to civil penalties and/or decertificafion for infractions as set forth in 15A NCAC 21-1.0807.

Certificate No 5080
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF THE
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
LABORATORY CERTIFICATION PROGRAM
In accordance with the provisions of N.C.G.S. 143-215.3 (a) (1), 143-215.3 (a)(10) and NCAC 2H.0800:
FIELD PARAMETERS ONLY
CP&L - ROXBORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
Is hereby certified to perform environmental analysis as listed on Attachment I and report monitonng data to DWQ for
compliance with NPDES effluent, surface water, groundwater, and pretreatment regulations.
By reference 15A NCAC 2H .0800 is made a part of this certificate.
This certificate does not guarantee validity of data generated, but indicates the methodology, equipment, quality control procedures,
records, and proficiency of the laboratory have been examined and found to be acceptable.
This certificate shall be valid until December 31. 2002
71 PX�
Steve W Tedder

V`%fiT Michael F. Easley, Governor
F9 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
O OG North Carolina Depan of Environment and Natural Resources
7 Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
[ Acting Director
—I Division of Water Quality
May 7, 2002
5080
Mr. Steven Conner
CP&L - Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
1700 Dunnaway Road
Semora, NC 27343-
Subject: North Carolina Field Parameter Laboratory Certification
Dear Mr. Conner:
We have received and reviewed the information you provided for North Carolina
Wastewater/Groundwater Field Parameter Environmental Laboratory Certification. Based
on this information, we can proceed with certification as requested. We will issue Field
Parameter Environmental Certification for the indicated parameters upon receipt of
payment for the enclosed invoice.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. We look forward to having you in
our program and to working with you in the future. If you have questions or need
additional information, contact us at 919-733-3908.
Sincerely,, /
9 VV � �
4 James W. Meyer
Laboratory Section
JWM:cub
Enclosure
cc: Connie Brower
Raleigh Regional Office
eNA
MENR
Laboratory Section N.C. Division of Water Quality 1623 Mail Service Center
[phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.esb.enr.state.nc.usAab
Raleigh, NC 27699-1623

INVOICE
DENR/DWQ WASTEWATER
LABORATORY CERTIFICATION
FIELD PARAMETERS
Certificate No. 5080
(if assigned)
Laboratory Name: C P _L - Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
Address 1700 Dunnaway Road
Semora, NC 27343
Attention: Mr. Steven Conner
-CCORDING TO YOUR APPLICATION YOU HAVE REQUESTED CERTIFICATION FOR THE FOLLOWING PARAMETER
JORGANICS
RESIDUAL CHLORINE
PH
TEMPERATURE
STATE LAB USE ONLY
Invoice Number: 004062
Date: 05/07/2002
Fowarded By:
Date Fowarded:
The following statement itemizes the fee required for obtaining or renewing certification in the North Carolina Wastewater Laboratory Certification Program,
Total Assessment Due: $100.00 Minimum Annual Fee for Municipal
Industrial Lab ($100.00). Commercial Lab
($200.00).
Please make your check payable to: DENR/DWQ Lab Certification
Mail payment to:
DENR/DWQ Laboratory Section
1623 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1623
For proper credit, return a copy of this invoice with your payment. And enter your certificate number (if assigned) on the check.
NOTE: In accordance with NCGS 25-3-512. a $20.00 processing fee will be charged for any check on which payment was refused by the payer bank.

OC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes: XX
If Yes, SOC No.:
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR CP&L ROXBORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
Date: March 20, 2002
To: Stormwater and General Permits Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: Teresa Rodriguez
County: Person
0
Permit No.: NCO03425 PERMIT RENEWAL
PART I -GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address: CP&L Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
1700 Dunnaway Road
Semora, North Carolina 27343
Person County
2. Date of Site Inspection: February 06, 2002
3. Report Prepared by: Mitch Hayes
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Joanie P. Cooke 919.362.3553
5. Directions to Site: From Raleigh, take US 70 West to I-85 to Durham. Exit
onto US 501 North. Drive to Roxboro, turn left onto Hwy. 57 North. Drive to
S.R. 1340, turn right. Drive to S.R. 1336, turn left Drive approximately one
mile and turn left onto Dunnaway Road. Drive to the end of road.
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
Outfall Number 003 Latitude: 36' 28' 48" Longitude: 79' 05' 11"
Outfall Number 006 Latitude: 36' 29' 12" Longitude: 79' 04' 41"
Attach a U.S.G.S. map extract and indicate treatment facility site and discharge
point on map.
U.S.G.S. Quad No.: B22 - NE U.S.G.S. Quad Name: Olive Hill, NC
Non -Discharge Staff Report
Page 1

Site siz, l expansion area consistent with appl on? Yes: X
No: rr ivo, explain:
Topography (relationship to flood plain included): According to FEMA Flood
Insurance Rate Map # 37145C0075 B, the facility is not within a 500-year
flood zone.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: one half mile
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Hyco Lake
a. Classification: WS - V&B
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 03 02 05
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
Hyco Lake discharges into Hyco River. Hyco River flows into Buggs Lake
in Virginia (Kerr Scott Lake in NC). Both lakes serve as the main water
supply for various cities and towns in NC and VA.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
a. Volume of Wastewater to be permitted: There are two Discharge Points: OUTFALL
003 (Heated Water Discharge Canal System), and OUTFALL 006 (Coal Pile Runoff
Treatment System). For Outfall 003 no flow is permitted however, the average flow
from Outfall 003 is 1081 MGD. For Outfall 006 no flow is permitted, however the
average flow is 0.4 MGD. Outfall 003 contains flows from several waste streams,
including once -through cooling water, stormwater runoff, and the effluent from the
ash pond (Outfall number 002), which in turn receives and treats combined flows
from the ash transport system, low volume wastes, the domestic wastewater system
(Outfall 008), the dry fly ash handling system, cooling tower blowdown (Outfall
number 005), storm water runoff, and drainage from the ash landfill. Outfall 008 is
the only flow permitted at 0.015 MGD.
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Waste Treatment facility?
For Outfall 008: 0.015 MGD
c. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current design capacity)?
For Outfall 008: 0.015 MGD
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous Authorization to Construct
issued in the previous two years: N/A
e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed wastewater
treatment facilities: The wastewater treatment system (Outfall 008) consists of:
a screen, comminutor, surge tank, aeration tank, clarifier, chlorine contact
chamber, and a sludge holding tank.
Non -Discharge Staff Report
Page 2

f. Please p le a description of proposed wastewa___ _eatment facilities: N/A
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: asbestos, strontium, uranium,
vanadium, zirconium, antimony, arsenic, beryllium, chromium, copper, lead,
nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc.
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A
in development: approved:
should be required: not needed:
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme:
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM permit no.: N/A
Residual Contractor:
Telephone No.:
b. Residuals stabilization: N/A
PSRP:
PFRP: Other:
c. Landfill: N/A
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify): Solomon Sanitary hauls the sludge
from the wastewater treatment plant and disposes of it at the City of Roxboro
Wastewater Treatment Plant.
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet):Grade I Physical /
Chemical
4. SIC Code(s): 4911
Wastewater Code(s) of actual wastewater, not particular facilities i.e., non -contact
cooling wa er discharge from a metal plating company would be 14, not 56.
Primary•,' 14,15,16,17, 60, 68, 69, 70, 73
Main Treatment Unit Code: 03 0 - 7
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or are any public monies
involved. (municipals only)? N/A
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: None
3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: (Please indicate) N/A
Non -Discharge Staff Report
Page 3

IM
zl�_
Submis„uu of Plans and Specifications
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all of the non -discharge
options available? Yes
Please provide regional perspective for each option evaluated.
Spray Irrigation: N/A
Connection to Regional Sewer System: N/A
Subsurface: N/A
Other disposal options: None
5. Other Special Items: None
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Mitch Hayes of the Division of Water Office conducted a site visit at CP&L Roxboro
Steam Plant on February 06, 2002 and reviewed the renewal application. There are five
permitted discharge outfalls under the current permit. Outfall 002 is the ash settling pond,
003 is the heated water discharge canal, 005 is the cooling tower water blowdown, 006 is
the coal pile run off discharge, and 008 is the wastewater treatment plant discharge.
Outfalls 003 and 006 discharge directly into Hyco Lake. Outfall 008 is the only permitted
flow at 0.015 MGD. Effluent from Outfall 003 and 004 were clear and free of solids.
Effluent from Outfall 005 contained some solids. Effluent from Outfall 006 was brownish
but clear. Effluent from Outfall 008 could not be seen since it is mixed in another pipe with
effluent from Outfall 005.
The biological monitoring study plan for 2002 was approved 12/07/2001. This discontinues
sampling for total solids and total suspended solids, and will discontinue sampling for
aluminum, cadmium, and mercury. Fish consumption advisory was removed which allows
sampling for bluegill and largemouth bass at Transect 2, and white catfish at Transects 2
and 6 to be dropped.
The facility is compliant with permit limitations and monitoring requirements. The
Raleigh Regional Office recommends the renewal of the permit NC0003425 in accordance
with the Roanoke River Basin Policy.
of report
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Non -Discharge Staff Report
Page 4
Date

CHsL (4y6oFa
�tea me Fo scfh`c
lant
c o0034 .2-5
t �i
�� �1 L
DutI-OLf I o o
Powerplalt T*- r
o
Sub to -
445 (��\%�1 T ��il trial Waste P
M� s

WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM OPERATORS
CERTIFICATION COMMISSION
CLASSMCAnON
LIX-611 _t V&ICI • ' __ 4. 1
CONTACTPERSON:\Tna GoVe - TFiBPHONE: (21J)362• 35�3
PERMIT NO: Nam!_ Check One: NC `� WQ _ HEALTH DP
ORC: -� i I n'i I� m TELEPHONE Sg9 • 117 4
RATING INFORMATION:: (Before completing this searonsplease refer to pages 2-4)
0Lif 1('I 00O
PERMITTED FLOW: MGD BNR? YES _ NO L—
CHECK CLASSIFICATION: WASTEWATER: 1 _
COLLECTION:
SPRAY IRRIGATION SUBSURFACE
PHYSICALICHE vIlCAL GRADE I
1
2 3_ 4_
2_ 3_ 4_
LAND APPLICATION
lei 1XI/7:411
-j� RATED BY: (�� REGION: '�� DATE: z0 7�0Z—
�/ REGIONAL OFFICE TELEPHONE NUMBER: 012) - 1.. 4700 EXT:o�

Classification of Biolopical Water Pollution Control Treatment Systems:
Grade I Biological WPCS
- Septic tanktsand filter systems
- Biological lagoon systems
- Constructed wetlands and associated appurtenances
Grade II Biological WPCS
- Systems that utilize an activated sludge or fixed growth process with a permitted flow
less than or equal to 0.5 million gallons per day (mgd)
Grade III Biological WPCS
- Systems that utilize an activated sludge or fixed growth process with a permitted flow
of greater than 0.5 through 23 million gallons per day (mgd;
- Grade II systems that are required to achieve biological nutrient reduction *
Grade IV Biological WPCS
- Systems that utilizing an activated sludge or fixed growth process with a permitted flow
of greater than 2.5 million gallons per day (mgd)
- Grade III systems that am required to achieve biological nutrient reduction *
* Biological Nutrient Reduction -
The reduction of total nitrogen or total phosphorous by an activated sludge or fixed growth
process as required by the facilities permit_
Classification of Collection Water Pollution Control Systems:
(whichever provides lowest grade)
Same grade as biological water pollution control system Grade of system:
Based on population served:
1,500 or Less = Grade I
1,501 to 15,000 = Grade U
15,001 to 50,000 = Grade IF
50,001 or more = Grade IV

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph D., Acting Director
Mr. Cecil Rowland
CP 'ZQ L - A Progress Energy Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
1700 Dunnaway Road
Semora, North Carolina 27343
o ,
�r, 1
O
C���
Novel rZ , 2001
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: NPDES Permit Renewal Application
Permit NC0003425
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
Person County
Dear Mr. Rowland:
The NPDES Unit received your permit renewal application on October 31, 2001. Thank you for
submitting this package.
The permit renewal for this facility has been assigned to Teresa Rodriguez. This staff member will
contact you if further information is needed to complete the permit renewal. Please note that the
NPDES Unit has several vacant positions. This staff shortage has lasted for over a year and is delaying
all permit renewals. Our remaining permit writers are currently reviewing Authorizations to Construct,
speculative limit requests, major permit modifications and 201 plan updates ahead of permit renewals.
This is necessary due to a variety of factors, including mandatory deadlines in the statutes which govern
our program.
If this staff shortage delays reissuance of NC0003425 the existing requirements in your permit will
remain in effect until the permit is renewed (or the Division takes other action). We appreciate your
patience and understanding while we operate with a severely depleted staff. If you have any additional
questions concerning renewal of the subject permit, please contact Teresa Rodriguez at (919) 733-
5083, extension 595. L S G 6 , as,
-( Z.Gf/` Y-I ` j Sincerely,
(o l Valery Stephens
Point Source Unit
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
NPDES File
1617 Mail Servbe Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 919 733-5083, exH.mlon 520 (fax) 919 733-0719
VISIT US ON THE INTERNET@ httpJ/h2o.enr.state.m.us/NPDES Valery.StephensOmmail.net

t
v�
CP&L
A Pro".. Energg [a iDdr1
OCT 31
Mr. David Goodrich r �s L__�_��
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resou T
Division of Water Quality D
OCT
1617 Mail Service Center 1 c001
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 —.
DENIR HATER QUALITY
r0V I "-d—IRCE BRANCH
Subject: Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Generating Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit Number NC0003425
Dear Mr. Goodrich:
The current NPDES permits for CP&L's Roxboro Steam Electric Generating Plant located
in Person County, expires on April 30, 2002. CP&L hereby requests that the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) renew the Roxboro Steam Electric
Generating Plant NPDES Permit (NC0003425) in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0105.
The Roxboro facility is expected to continue to operate over the next five years as it has
previously, with the exception of the addition of several Selective Catalytic Reduction
devises (SCR), air emission control devises. One SCR has already been installed and
has had no impact on any wastewater stream at the facility.
Enclosed, in triplicate, are EPA Forms 1 and 2C (Enclosures 1 and 2, respectively). The
domestic sludge from the facility is disposed of by a licensed hauler. Consequently, no
sludge management plan is included in this submittal
CP&L appreciates the continued cooperation demonstrated by the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality staff in responding to its permitting needs. If you have any
questions or comments regarding this information, please contact Ms. Joanie Cooke at
[phone] or Mr. Steven Conner at [phone].
Roxboro Steam Plant
1700 Dunnaway Road
Semora. NC 27343

Mr. D. Goodrich
2
•r
OCT
`7 certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were
prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
managed the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment
for knowing violations."
Sincerely,
Cecil Rowland
Plant Manager
Roxboro Steam Electric Generating Plant
Enclosures

4
i-arolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Enclosure I
Form 1 - General Infonnation
U Ajoanie\permir\aa. rox

Pleask prihi or type in the unshaded areas only
(fill-in areas are Seate4 for elite Will. i.e.. 12 Character$,
Form Approved. OMB No. 2040-0086. Approval expires 5-31-92.
FORM
1
U VIKONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY—. EPA LD NUMBER
EPA ..�NERAL INFORMATION s TIA c°
Consolidated Permits Program F D
GENERAL
Readthe'General Instructions' before starting), 2 13 lit ,
LABEL
ITEMS
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
If a preprinted label has been provided, affix it in
I. EPA I.D. NUMBER
the designated space. Review the information
carefully; if any of it is incorrect, cross through it
III. FACILITY NAME
and enter the correct data in the appropriate fill-
in area below. Also, if any of the preprinted data
FACILITY
is absent the area to the left of the label s ace
V'MAILING ADDRESS
PLEASE PLACE LABEL IN THIS SPACE -
lists theiniormafanthat should appear),pease
provide it in the proper fill-in area(s)below. If the
label is complete and correct, you need not
complete Items I, 111, V, and VI (except Vl-B
which mustbe completed regardless). Complete
VI FACILITY
all items if no label has been provided. Refer to
LOCATION
theinstructions for detailed Rem descriptions and
for the legal authorizations under which this data
is collected.
II. POLLUTANT CHARACTERISTICS
INSTRUCTIONS: Complete A through J to determine whether you need to submit any permit application forms to the EPA. It you answer'yes' to any questions,
you must submit this form and the supplemental form listed in the parenthesis following the question. Mark'X' in the box in the third column if the supplemental
form is attached. If you answer *no' to each question, you need not submit any of these forms. You may answer 'no" if your activity is excluded from permit
requirements; see Section C of the instructions. See also, Section D of the instructions for definitions of bold-faced terms.
SPECIFIC QUESTIONS
MARK
SPECIFIC QUESTIONS
YES
NO
a
o u
ATTA
YES
Mo
ATTACKED
A. Is this facility a publicly owned treatment works
B. Does or will this facility (either existing or proposed)
which results in a discharge to waters of the U.S.?
include a concentrated animal feeding operation or
(FORM 2A)
X
aquatic animal production facllity which results in a
X
discharge to waters of the U.S.? (FORM 28)
=
21
,
T
C. Is this a facility which currently results in discharges to
D- Is this a proposea facility (other than those described
waters of the U.S. other than those described in A or B
X
X
in A or B above) which will result in a discharge to
X
above? FORM 2C
waters of the U.S.? FORM 2D
23
28
2]
22
23
24
F. Do you or will you inject at this facility industrial or
E. Does or will this facility treat, store, or dispose of
municipal effluent below the lowermost stratum
hazardous wastes? (FORM 3)
X
containing, within one quarter mile of the well bore,
X
underground sources of drinking water? FORM 4)
3,
32
33
ze
29
30
G. Doyou cta r s facility to tho uc water
other fluids which
or other fluids which are brought to the surface in
H. Do you or will you inject at this facility fluids for
connectionwith conventional oil or natural gas production,
special processes such as mining of sulfur by the
Frisch solution mining of minerals, in
inject fluids used for enhanced recovery of oil or natural
process, situ
gas, or inject fluids for storage of liquid hydrocarbonsz
XI
combustion of fossil fuel, or recovery of geothermal
X
(FORM 4)
energy? (FORM 4)
32
38
39
34
35 1
3e
I. Is this facility a proposed stationary source which is
J. Is this facility a proposed stationary source which is
one of the 28 industrial categories listed in the
NOT one of the 28 industrial categories listed in the
instructions and which will potentially emit 100 tons per
instructions and which will potentially emit 250 tons per
year of any air pollutant regulated under the Clean Air
year of any air pollutant regulated under the Clean Air
Act and mayaffector be located in an attainment area?
X
Actand mayaffector be located in an attainment areffi
I
IX
(FORM 5)
(FORM 5)
,a
41
42
1 43
1 dd 1
45
III. NAME OF FACILITY
t
SKIP
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
,
1
fig
IV. FACILITY CONTACT
A. NAME & TITLE last, first, & title
B. PHONE areacode& no.
2
Rowland Cecil Plant Manager
336
1599
7411
d d
V. FACILITY MAILING ADDRESS
A. STREET OR P.O. BOX
3 1700 Dunnawa Road
B. CITY OR TOWN C. STAT 0. ZIP CODE
c
4 Semora NC 27343
d d 1
VI. FACILITY LOCATION
A. STREET, ROUTE N0. OR OTHER SPECIFIC IDENTIFIER
c
5
Person County Road 1377
451
B. COUNTY NAME
Person
46 70
C. CITY OR T N
D STATEI
E. ZIP CODEF.
UNTY DE
fknown
c
s Roxboro
NC
27573
,s ,8 da
dt I2
a1 Sl
52
Ern run. 3510-1 to-aul CONTINUE ON REVERSE
W E..F,

Cr1NVINhPn FROM THE FRONT
VII. SIC CODES (4 dglt in order of pfionty)
A. FIRST B. SECOND
A.
4911
1
(specify)
Electric Power Services
7
151
C. THIRD
D. FOURTH
la 19
(specify)
y
15
i6 19
(specify)
7
15
VIII. OPERATOR INFORMATION
A. NAME
I B. Is the name listed In
c
Carolina Power & Light Company
Item VIII-A also the
owner?
E ®YES NO
8
5
IB 55
51
C.STATUS OF OPERATOR Enter the appropriate letter into
the answerbox;
if'Other'specify.)
D. PHONE areacode&no.
F= FEDERAL M = PUBLIC (otherthantederalorstate)
S = STATE 0 = OTHER (specify)
P=PRIVATE
P
(specify)
A
I
336
,
L599
1174
E. STREET OR P.O. BOX
1700 Dunnaway Road
26
F. CITY OR TOWN
JG.STATE
H.
ZIP CODE
I IX. INDIAN LAND
B
Semora
I NC
27343
Is the facility located on Indian lands?
[:]YES ®NO
sz
s
,e �a
�1 •z
17 - 5,
X. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS
A. NPDES (Discharges to Surface Water
D. PSD (Air missions from Proposed Sources
9
N
g
p
See Attachment 1
B. UIC
Under round Injection of Fluids
E. OTHER (specify)
9
U
9
(specify)
C. RCRA Hazardous Wastes
E. OTHER sec'
9
R
9
(specify)
1
1
u
,
rr,
XI. MAP
Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending to at least one mile beyond property boundaries. The map must show the outline of the
facility, the location of each of its existing and proposed intake and discharge structures, each of its hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facilities,
and each well where it injects fluids underground. Include all springs, rivers and other surface water bodies in the map area. See instructions for precise
requirements. See Attachment 2
XII. NATURE OF BUSINESS (provide a brief description)
Electric Utility - This facility is an electric generating facility consisting of four coal-fired units with a total net capacity of
2462 MWe.
XIII. CERTIFICATION (see instructions)
1 certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this application and all attachments and
that, based on my inquiry of those persons immediately responsible for obtaining the information contained in the application, I believe that the information
is true, accurate and complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and
imprisonment.
A. NAME & OFFICIAL TITLE (typeorprint)
Cecil Rowland
Plant Manner -Roxboro Plant
B. SIGNATURE
C. DATE SIGNED
COMMENTS FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
c
C
I ,
EPA Form 3510-1 (8-90)

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Attachment I
Form 1 - Item X Existing Environmental Permits
Issuing Agency
Type of Permit
ID Number
Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
NPDES
NC0003425
DWQ
Ash Reuse Program
WQ00070020
Permit
DEM*
Construction and
01001R27
Operation of Air
Emission Sources
Division of Health Services
Solid Waste Permit
73-02
(Sanitary Landfill)
* Since issuance of permit agency name has changed to Division of Water Quality

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Attachment 2
Form 1 - Item M Map

• %-arolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Attachment 2
Form 1 - Item XI Map
Roxboro Steam
Electric Plant
Afterbay
Cane Creek Reservoir
NORTH CAROLINA •�
Auxiliary Intake
Main
,yt,Dam
1S)
Plant Site `
Intake Canal
�yt-1 Discharge Ash Settling Pond
Cobbs Creek
North Hyoo River
0 1 2 3
i 1 1 1 South Hyco River
Kib� meters
0 1 2
L 1 1
Miles
2

..a: olina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Enclosure 2
Form 2C - Application for Permit to Discharge Wastewater

• EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item f of Form 1) Form Approved
OMB No. 2040.0086
Please nrint nr tvnn in the unshaded areas only. Approval expires 5-31-92
FORM
2C
NPDES
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTI01 ICY
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER
r H EXISTING MANUFACTURING, COMMERCIAL, MINING AND SILVICULTURAL OPERATIONS
EPA
Consolidated Permits Program
I. OUTFALL LOCATION
For each outfall, list the latitude and longitude of its location to the nearest 15 seconds and the name of the receiving water.
A.OUTFALL
NUMBER
list
B. LATITUDE
C. LONGITUDE
D. RECEIVING WATER (name)
1. DEG.
2. MIN.
3. SEC.
1. DEG.
2. MIN.
3 SEC.
003
36
28
48
79
05
11
Hyco Reservoir
006
36
19
13
79
04
41
Hyco Reservoir
IL FLOWS, SOURCES OF POLLUTION, AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
A. Attach a line drawing showing the water flow through the facility. Indicate sources of intake water, operations contributing wastewater to the effluent,
and treatment units labeled to correspond to the more detailed descriptions in Item B. Construct a water balance on the line drawing by showing average
flows between intakes, operations, treatment units, and outfalls. If a water balance cannot be determined (e.g., for certain mining activities), provide a
pictorial description of the nature and amount of any sources of water and any collection or treatment measures. See Attachment 1
B. For each outfall, provide a description of: (1) All operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, including process wastewater, sanitary wastewater,
cooling water, and storm water runoff; (2) The average flow contributed by each operation; and (3) The treatment received by the wastewater. Continue
on additional sheets if necessary. See Attachment 2
1. OUT-
FALLING
(list)
2.OPERATION S CONTRIBUTING FLOW
a.
a. OPERATION (list) b.AVERAGE FLOW
units)
3. TREATMENT
a. DESCRIPTION b. LIST CODES FROM
TABLE 2C-1
Once through and non -contact
1069 MGD
Evaporation, discharge to surface
1-F
4-A
cooling
003 1
Ash Pond(including low volume
12 MGD
Neutralization, opdation
2-K
2-B
wastes coal pile runoff, plant
sedimentation, absorption
1-U
2-A
drainage s stem,domestic waste,
oiUwater separators, Unit 4 cooling
tower blowdwon ash landfill drainage,
silo wash water, ash transport system,
and stormwater
Stormwater
Discharge to surface
4-A
Coal Pile Runoff
0.4 MGD
Sedimentation neutralization
1-U
2-K
006
OFFICIALUSEONLY (effluent guidelines sub -categories)
EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) PAGE 1 OF 4 CONTINUE ON REVERSE
STF ENV441F.I

CON?INUED FROM THE FRONT
C. Except for storm runoff, leaks, or spills, are any discharges described in Items II -A or B intermitten Lsonal?
YES (complete the following table) ® NO (go I ton 111)
3. FREQUENCY
1
4. FLOW
a. FLOW RATE
b.TOTAL VOLUME
1.OUTFALL
2. OPERATION(s)
a. DAYS
b. MONTHS(in
m d)
(specifywith units
c.DUR-
I LONGTERM
AVERAGE
2. MAXIMUM
DAILY
1. LONG TERM
AVERAGE
2. MAXIMUM
DAILY
NUMBER
(list)
CONTRIBUTING FLOW
(list)
PER WEEK
(specify
average)
PER YEAR
(specify
average)(In
ATION
Bays)
III. PRODUCTION
A. Does an effluent guideline limitation promulgated by EPA under Section 304 of the Clean W ater Act apply to your facility?
0 YES (complete Item III-B) NO (go to Section IV)
B. Are the limitations in the applicable effluent guideline expressed in terms of production (or othermeasure of operation)?
❑ YES (complete Item III-C) ® NO (go to Section IV)
C. If you answered "yes" to Item III-B, list the quantity which represents an actual measurement of your level of production, expressed in the terms and units
used in the applicable effluent guideline, and indicate the affected oudalls.
1. AVERAGE DAILY PRODUCTION
2.AFFECTED
a. QUANTITY PER DAY
b. UNITS OF MEASURE
c. OPERATION, PRODUCT, MATERIAL, ETC.
OUTFALLS
(specify)
(IistouUall numbers)
IV. IMPROVEMENTS
A. Are you now required by any Federal, State or local authority to meet any implementation schedule for the construction, upgrading or operation of wastewater
treatment equipment or practices or any other environmental programs which may affect the discharges described in this application? This includes,
but is not limited to, permit conditions, administrative or enforcement orders, enforcement compliance schedule letters, stipulations, court orders, and grant
or loan conditions. YES (complete the following table) ® NO (go to Item IV-B)
1. IDENTIFICATION OF CONDITION,
AGREEMENT, ETC.
2. AFFECTED OUTFALLS
3. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
C HNAIAN
COM-
E DATE
a.NO.
b. SOURCE OF DISCHARGE
a. RE
OUIRED
b.PRO-
JECTED
B. OPTIONAL: You may attach additional sheets describing any additional water pollution control programs (or other environmental projects which may affect
your discharges) you now have underway or which you plan. Indicate whether each program is now underway or planned, and indicate your actual or
planned schedules for construction. ❑ MARK "X" IF DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL CONTROL PROGRAMS IS ATTACHED
EPA Form 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85)
PAGE 2OF4
CONTINUE ON PAGE 3
STF ENV441F.2

•I EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item 1 of Form?)
CONTINUED FROM PAGE 2
V. INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICa i"'t+8
A, B. & C: See instructions before proceeding — Complete one set of tables for each oudall — Annotate the oudall number in the space provided.
NOTE: Tables V-A, V-B, and V-C are included on separate sheets numbered V-1 through V-9.
D. Use the space below to list any of the pollutants listed in Table 2c-3 of the instructions, which you know or have reason to believe is discharged or may be
discharged from any outfall. For every pollutant you list, briefly describe the reasons you believe it to be present and report any analytical data in your
possession.
1.POLLUTANT
2. SOURCE
1.POLLUTANT
2. SOURCE
Asbestos
Used in insulation, trace amounts
may be washed down drains in
plant areas during maintenance
activities.
Strontium
Trace elements occasionally
Uranium
present in coal.
Vanadium
Zirconium
VI. POTENTIAL DISCHARGES NOT COVERED BY ANALYSIS
Is any pollutant listed in Item V-C a substance or a component of a substance which you currently use or manufacture as an intermediate or final product or
byproduct?
® YES (list allsuch pollutants below) ❑ NO (go to Item Vl-B)
The following substances may be contained in coal:
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
See Attachment 3 for Potential Discharges Not Covered by Analysis
EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90)
PAGE 3OF 4
CONTINUE ON REVERSE
STF ENV441F 3

CONTINOED FROM THE FRONT
VII. BIOLOGICAL TOXICITY TESTING DATA
Do you have any knowledge or reason to believe any biological test for acute or chronic toxicity has lade on any of your discharges or on a
receiving water in relation to your discharge within the last 3 years?
® YES (Identify the test(s) and describe their purposes below) NO (go to Section Vlll)
Outtall 003 - Quarterly acute toxicity sampling has been performed on this outtall during the current permit cycle.
All samples for toxicity passed.
Outfall 006 - Annual acute toxicity sampling has been performed on this outfall during the current permit cycle.
All samples for toxicicty passed.
Vill. CONTRACT ANALYSIS INFORMATION
Were any of the analyses reported in Item V performed by a contract laboratory or consulting firm?
❑X Y ES (list the name, address, and telephone number of, and pollutants NO (go to Section IX)
analyzed by, each such laboratory or firm below)
A. NAME
& ADDRESS
C. TELEPHONE
D. POLLUTANTS ANALYZED
area code& no.
(list)
Tritest, Inc.
3909 Beryl Road
[phone]
All parameters except
Raleigh, NC 27607
total residual chlorine,
pH, temperature, boron,
and bromide.
Oxford Laboratories, Inc.
1316 South Fifth Street
[phone]
Boron
Wilmington, NC 28401
PACE Analytical Services
9800 Kincey Ave, Suite 100
[phone]
Bromide
Huntersville, NC 28078
IX. CERTIFICATION
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnelpropedy gather and evaluate the information submltted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or
those persons directly responsible forgathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
A. NAME 6 OFFICIAL TITLE (typeorprint)
B. PHONE NO. (area code 8 no.)
Cecil Rowland
336 599-1174
C. SIGNATURE J
D. DATE SIGNED
J/��
1
j/�j/%_
Y.
/C /,7�/k
CAL -GC
tYA Form JOIu-zu (B-Bu)
PAGE 4 OF 4
STF ENV441F 4

PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE IN THE UNSHADED AREAS ONLY. You may report some or all of EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item I of Form 1)
this information on separate sheets (use the same format) instead of completing these pages.
SEE INSTRUCTIONS.
V. INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS (continued from page 3 of Form 2-C)
OUTFALL NO.003
PART A - You mustprovide the results of at least one analysis for ever pollutant in this table. Complete one table for each outfall. See instructions for additional details.
2. EFFLUENT
3. UNITS
I. INTAKE
b.MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE
c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE
(specify itblank
a. L N Wall
1.POLLUTANT
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
fdavailable
if available
d.NO.OF
AVERAGE VALUE
b. NO. OF
a. CONCEN-
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
ANALYSES
(1)
(2)MASS
TRATION
b.MA55
ANALYSES
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
.
aBiochemical
oxygen Demand
<2 0
1
m /I
b Chemical
OCygpn Demand
00
15
63287
1
m CIA
k da
c. Total Organic
Carbon (roc)
5.28
22,277
1
m /1
k /day,
d Total Suspended
Solids (Tss)
2.0
1 8,438
1
m /I
kg/day
e Ammonia (as All
0.17
717
1
mail
kg/day
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
I Flow
1114.7
1101.7
1046.8
12
MGD
--
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
g Temperature
o`.
(winter)
34
31
34
1 6
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
n Temperature
oC
(summer)
41
38
35
6
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
pH
1
6.8
1 8.0
6.8
8.0
52
STANDARD UNITS
PARTS - Mark 'X' in column 2-a for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe is present.
Mark'X' in column 2-b for each pollutant you believe to be absent. II you mark column 2a lot any pollutant
which is limited either directly, or indirectly but expressly, in an effluent limitations guideline, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. For other pollutants Ior which you mark
column 2a, you must provide quantitative data or an explanalion of their presence in
your discharge. Complete one table for each oudall. See the instructions for additional details and requirements.
1. POLLU-
TANT AND
2. MARK 'X'
3. EFFLUENT
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE b.MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE
c.L N TERM AVRG. VALUE
4. UNITS
colt o tional
CAS N0.
iiEVED LIiEVED
if available
if available d. NO. OF
a. CONCEN- b. MASS
a. LO NGTERM b.N F
AVERAGE VALUE ANAL.
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MAS
(1)
(2)MAS
ANAL-
(if available)
5 E. SD-
TRATION
CONCENTRATION
I
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
YSES
CONCENTRATION
a Bromide
(24959-67-9)
X
<1.0
-
1
m /I
b Chlorine,
Total Residual
X
0.02
1
m /1
c. Color
X
15
1
CPU
d Fecal
Coliform
X
6
1
coU100m1
a Fluoride
(16984-48-8)
X
0.15
633
1
mail
k /da
f. Nitrate —
Nitrite (as N)
X
0.47
1 983
0.47
1 960
0.11
436
12
m /I
k /da
EPA Form 361n.9C
IA.Gnl
.....
x-r
CONTINUE ON REVERSE
STF ENV441F.5

ITEM V-13 CONTINUED FROM FRONT
1. POLLU-
2. MARK
'X'
3. EFFLUENT
1 A. UNITS
5. INTAKE (optional)
TANT AND
a.
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE
c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE
C. N0. OF
.
aLONG TERM
CAS NO.
LIEVED
LiEVEO
it available
i7available
ANAL-
a. CONCEN-
b. MASS
AVERAGE VALUE
It. NO. OF
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
(Javailabla)
PRE.
SENT
Aa-
SENT
YSES
TRATION
ANAL -
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
YSES
g Nitrogen,
total Organic
(as N)
X
0.68
2 896
0.68
2 836
0.26
1 030
12
m A
k /da
h Oil and
Grease
X
20.9
88180
1
m A
k /da
i Phosphorus
(7723-14-0)
X
0.15
633
0.15
625
0.025
99
12
m A
kg/day
I Radioactivity
(1) Alpha,
Total
X
1.31
5.53E-3
1
PCV1
CVda
(2) Beta,
Total
X
3.72
1.57E-2
1
pcill
Ci/da
(3) Radium,
Total
Testino
and
reDortina
not
required
(4) Radium
226, Total
Testinq
and
reporting
not
require
IN Sulfate
(as SO )
(14808.79-e)
I X
17.0
71,725
1
m A
k /da
I Sulfide
(as S)
X
<1.0
--
1
m A
in Sudile
S4
65!45-3
X
<1.0
1
m /1
n Suifacent3
X
<0.20
1
m A
0. Atuminum,
Total
(7429-90-5)
X
0.125
527
1
m A
k /da
p. Barium,
Total7440-39-3
X
0.021
89
1
m A
k /da
Boron,
(7440-42.9)
X
0.072
304
1
m A
k /da
r. Cobalt,
Total
7440-4e-4
X
<0.005
1
m /1
s Iran,
Total
7439-89-6
X
0.175
738
1 1
m A
k /da
1. Magnesium,
Total
7439-95-4
X
4.11
17.341
1
nfA
k /da
u Molybtlenum,
Total
7439.98.7
X
<0.005
1
m
_
V Manganese,
Total
7439.96.5
X
0.033
139
1
m CIA
k /da
w Tin, Total
(7440-31.5)
X
G0.010
1
m A
N. Titanium,
Total
(744 0-32.6)
X
<0.005
1
m A
EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) PAGE V-2 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-3
STF ENV441F.8

(copy from Item I of Form 1) 1 OUTFALL NUMBER
CONTINUED FROM PAGE 3 OF FORM 2-C
INTOW
PART C - It you are a primary industry and this outfall contains process wastewater, refer to Table 2c-2 in the instructions to determine which of the GC/MS fractions you must test for. Mark 'X' in column
2-a for all such GC/MS fractions that apply to your industry and for ALL toxic metals, cyanides, and total phenols. If you are not required to mark column 2-a (secondary industries, nonprocess
wastewater outfalls, and nonrequired GC/MS fractions), mark "X" in column 2-b for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe is present. Mark "X" In column 2-c for each pollutant you
believe is absent. If you mark column 2a for any pollutant, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. If you mark column 2b for any pollutant, you must provide the results.
of at least one analysis for that pollutant if you know or have reason to believe it will be discharged in concentrations of 10 ppb or greater. If you mark column 2b for acrolein, acrylonitrile, 2,4
dinitrophenol, or 2-methyl-4, 6 dinitrophenol, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for each of these pollutants which you know or have reason to believe that you discharge in
concentrations of 100 ppb or greater. Otherwise, for pollutants for which you mark column 2b, you must either submit at least one analysis or briefly describe the reasons the pollutant is expected to
be discharged. Note that there are 7 pages to this part; please review each carefully. Complete one table (all? pages) for each outfall. See instructions for additional details and requirements.
1. POLLUTANT
2. MARK W
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
5. INTAKE (option
AND CAS
a, 7E57
e. aE
s. 6E
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE
c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE
d. NO. OF
a. LONG
TERM
NUMBER
tN0
uByEo
u6VEo
(it available)
(ifevailable)
ANAL-
a. CONCEN.
b. MASS
AVERAGE
VALUE
b. NO. OF
(ilavailable)
011.
SENT
SENT
YSES
TRATION
ANAL -
(1)
()MASS(1)
(2) MA
(1)
O MASS
(I)CONCEN
(2)MASS
Ed
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
TRATION
YSES
METALS, CYANIDE, AND TOTAL PHENOLS
1M. Antimony,
Total(7440-36-0)
X
X
<0,003
1
Ma/1
2M Arsenic,
Total(7440-38.2)
X
X
<0.005
1
mO
3M Beryllium,
Total, 7440.41.7)
X
X
<0.002
1
m A
4M. Cadmium,
Total (7440-43.9)
X
X
<0.005
1
m A
5M. Chromium,
Total(7440-47.3)
X
X
<0.010
1
m A
6M Copper,
Total (7440-50 a)
X
X
<0.010
1
m A
7M Lead,
Total(7439-92.1)
X
X
<0.005
__
1
m A
8M. Mercury,
Total(7439-97-6)
X
X
<0,2
1
U A
9M. Nickel,
Total(7440.02.0)
X
X
<0.020
1
m A
10M. Selenium,
Tolal(7782.49.2)
X
X
<0.002
_
1
mclA
11 M. Silver,
-
Total (7440.22.4)
X
X
<0.010
12M Thallium,
Total (7440-28.0)
X
X
<0.001
1
m A
13M. Zinc,
Total(7440.66 6)
X
X
<0,010
1
m A
14M. Cyanide,
Total(57.12.5)
X
X
<0.005
1
m A
15M Phenols,
Total
X
X
<10
1
uoA
DIOXIN
2,3.7,8 Tetra-
Tetra-
RESULTS
Dioxin ( 1-6)
EFTXTDEICRIBE
PAGE V-3 CONTINUE ON REVERSE
STF ENV441F.7

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
1. POLLUTANT
1 2. MARK 'X'
1 3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
S. INTAKE (option
AND CAS
BE
c. eE
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b.MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE
c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE
d. NO. OF
A. LONG
TERM
NUMBER
1I.TEST-11,.
ING
LIEVED
LIEVED
i7available
it available
ANAL-
a. CONCEN-
D. MASS
AVERAGE
VALUE
b. NO. OF
11)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
D)CONCEN
(2)MASS
(ilavailable)
OUIR.
SENT
SENT
YSES
TRATION
ANAL-
ED
CONCENi RATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
TRATION
YSES
GC/MS FRACTION — VOLATILE COMPOUNDS
TV Aacfeln
(107-02.8)
X
X
<50
1
u 1
2V. Acrylonivile
(107-13.1)
X
X
<50
1 1
U /1
_
3V Benzene
(71-43.2)
X
X
<5
1
u /I
4V Bis (Chloro.
methyl) Ether
(542-88.1)
Testing
and
reporting
not
required
5V Bromolorm
(75-25-2)
X
X
<5
1
U /1
6V. Carbon
Tetrachloride
(56-23.5)
X
X
<5
1
U /1
7V Chloroben.
zene (108 90-7)
X
X
1 <5
11
UCIA
8V. CNiorodi-
bromomethane
(124.48.1)
X
X
<5
--
1
u 1
9V Chloroethane
(75-00-3)
X
X
<10
1
U /I
10V 2-Chloro-
ethylvinyl Ether
(110.75-8)
X
X
<10
-
1
U /I
I1V. Chloroform
(67.66-3)
X
I X
I <5
1
U CIA
12V. Dichloro.
bromomethane
(75-27-4)
X
X
<5
1
uaA
13V. Dichloro.
dillooromethane
(75-71.8)
X
X
<5
1
uciA
14V 1,1-DlChloro-
ethane (75-34-3)
X
X
<5
1
U QA
15V. 1,2-Dichloro.
ethane (107-06.2)
X
X
<5
1
U
16V 1,1-Dichloro-
ethylene (75-35-4)
X
X
<5
1
U A
17V 1,2-Dichloro.
propane (78.87.5)
X
X
<5
1
U gA
18V 1,3-Dichloro.
propylene (542.75.6)
X
X
<5
--
1
u /1
19V Ethylbenzene
(100 41-4)
X
X
<5
--
1
u /1
zov Methyl
Bromide (74-83.9)
X
X
<10
1
U n
2/V Methyl
C hloride p4-87-3)
X
X
<10
1
U /1
--
EPA Form 351U-2C (6-Bu) PAGE V-4 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-5
STF ENV441 F.8

EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item 1 of Form 1) OUTFALL NUMBER
CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-d 1 1 003
1. POLLUTANT
2. MARK 'X'
3. EFFLUENT
d. UNITS
S. INTAKE (optional)
AND CAS
r. TEST
6. BE
c. SE-
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b.MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE
c. LONGTERM AVRG. VALUE
d. NO.OF
a. LONG
TERM
NUMBER
ING
UEVED
UEVEU
if available
ifaveilable
ANAL•
a. CONCEN-
b. MASS
AVERAGE
VALUE
b.NO. Of
(ifavailable)
oUIR-
SENT
SENT
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
YSES
TRATION
(1)CONCEN
(2)MASS
ANAL-
ED
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
TRATION
YSES'
GC/MS FRACTION — VOLATILE COMPOUNDS (continued)
22V Methylene
Chloride(75.09-2)
X
X
<5
^-
1
Lilco
23V 1,1,2,2-Tetra.
chloroethane
79-34-5
x
X
<$
1
1
U 1
24V Tetrachloro-
ethylene (127 18 4)
X
X
<5
1
u /1
25V. Toluene
(108-88-3)
x
x
<5
1
UCIA
26V. 1,2-Trans.
Dichloroethylene
156-60-5
x
x
<5
1
U 1
-
27V 1,1,1 Tm
chloroethane
55-6
X
X
<5
1
LOA
-
28V 1,1,2-Tm
chloroethane
79-00-5
X
X
i <5
1
u /1
29V Trichloro-
ethylene (79.01-6)
x
x
<5
1
U /1
^^
30V Trichloro.
Iluoromethane
75-69.4)
X
x
<5
1
UCIA
31V Vinyl
Chloride (75 01.4)
x
x
<10
1
U /1
--
GCIMS FRACTION — ACID COMPOUNDS
1A. 2-Chlorc-
phenol (95-57-8)
X
X
<10
1
U /1
2A 2,4-Dichloro.
phenol(120.83.2)
x
x
<10
1
U A
3A. 2A.Dimethyb
phenol(105.67.9)
x
x
<10
__
1
U /1
4A. 4,6-Dinitro-O-
Cresol (534.52.1)
x
x
<50
1
LICIA
5A. 2,4-Dinitro.
phenol (51-28 5)
X
X
<50
11
u 1
6A. 2-Nitrophenol
(89.75-5)
X
X
<10
1
U
7A. 4-Nitrophenol
(100-02.7)
x
x
<10
""
1
U A
—
8A P-Chloro-M.
Cresol(59.50.7)
x
x
<10
1
U /1
9A. Pentachlom.
phenol (87-86.5)
<30
1
UICA.
Phenol
(108.95-2)
txxx
<10
—"
1
U n11A
2,4,6-Tri
chlorophenol
(88 06-2)
<10
--
1
Li/1
--
EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) PAGE V-5 CONTINUE ON REVERSE
STF ENV441F 9

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
I.POLLUTANT
2. MARK'X' 1
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
S. INTAKE (option
AND CAS
a. TEST
6. BE-
c, BE-
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE
c, LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE
d.NO.OF
a. LONG
TERM
NUMBER
ING
LIEVED
LIEVED
(it available)
ilavadable
ANAL-
a. CONCEN-
b. MASS
AVERAGE
VALUE
b. NO. OF
(l available)
OUER.
SENT
SENT
YSES
TRATION
ANAL-
Ill
(2) MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
Ill
(21 MASS
(II CONCEN
(2)MASS
ED
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
TRATION
YSES
GC/MS FRACTION — BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
1B. Acenaphlhene
(B3.32.9)
Testing
and
reporting
no
require
2B. Acenaphtylene
(208-96-8)
3B. Anthracene
(120,12.7)
4B Benzioine
(92-87-5)
5B. Benzo (al
Anthracene
56-55-3
6B. Benzo (a)
Pyrene(50-32 8)
7B 3,4.Benzo-
Iluoranthene
(205-99-2)
8B Benzo (ghi)
Perylene
91.24-2
9B. Benzo (k)
Fluoranthene
207-OB-9
10B. Ella (2 Chloro
ethoxy) Melhane
11 91-1
11 B. Bis (2-Chloro-
ethyp Ether
11.44.4
126 Be (2-Chlowl,
propy9 E1hei (102 604 �
13B. Bis (2-E1hyl-
hexyl) Phthalate
17-81.7
148. 4-Bronno-
phenyl Phenyl
Ether 101.55.3
15B Butyl Benzyl
Phthalate (85-66-7)
16B. 2-Chloro-
naphthalene
91.58-7
17B. 4-Chloro.
phenyl Phenyl
Ether 7005.72.3
188. Chrysene
(218.01.9)
196 Dibenzo (a, h)
Anthracene
53-70-3
20B 1,2-0tichloro-
benzene(95.50-1)
21B. 1,3.Dichto7o.
benzene(541.73.1)
EPA Form 3510.2C (8-90) PAGE V-5 -moo 1NUEOR_PAZ'EY7
STF ENV.441F.10

EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy(rom tram 1 of Form 1) OUTFALL NUMBER
CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-6 I I nn-'i
1. POLLUTANT
2. MARK W
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
5. INTAKE (option
AND CAS
a. TEST.
b. BE
c. BE.
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE
c. LONGTERM AVRG. VALUE
d. NO.OF
a. LONG
TERM
NUMBER
IINE
I.IIEaVED
LIEVBED
davailable
if available
ANAL-
a. CONCEN•
b. MASS
AVERAGE
VALUE
b.NO.OF
(it available)
oblR.
SENT
SENT
YSES
TRATION
ANAL-
(1)
(2)MASS
I
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
(I)CONCEN
(2)MASS
ED
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
TRATION
YSES
GCIMS FRACTION— BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (continued)
22B. 1,4-Dichloro-
benzene (106-46-7)
Testinq
and
reporting
not
required
23B. 3,3'.Dichloro-
benzidine
91.94.1
24B Diethyl
Phthalate
84-66.2
258 Dimethyl
Phthalate
31-11 3
26B. Di-N-Butyl
Phthalate
84-74.2
27B. 2A.Dinitro.
toluene(121 14.2)
288. 2,6-Dinilro-
toluene (606.20.2)
29B. Di-N-Octyl
Phthaiale
(117-84-0
30B 1,2.Diphenyl-
hydrazine (as Azo-
benzene) (122-66.7
31B Fluoranthene
(206-44-0)
32B. Fluorene
(86.73.7)
33B Hexachloro-
benzene 1118.74-1)
34B Hexachloro-
butadiene (87 68-3)
35B Hexachloro.
cyclopentadiene
77 47-/
368. Hexachloro.
ethane (67.72-1)
37B. Indeno
(1,2,3.cd) Pyrene
93.39.5
38B. Isophorone
(78-59.1)
398. Naphthalene
(91-20-3)
40B Nitrobenzene
(98-95.3)
41B N-Nitroso.
dimethylamine
62-75-9
42B N-Nilrosodi-
N-Propylamine
(621.64.7)
cue rn,— acln_or
a am
• • -•••• --•- -- 1— -.r rw�c v•r CONTINUE ON REVERSE
STF ENV441F.11

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
L POLLUTANT
2. MARK
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
S. INTAKE (option
AND CAS
.,TEST,
a. 6E-
c. aE-
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b.MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE
c. LONGTERM AVRG. VALUE
d. NO.OF
a. LONG
TERM
NUMBER
ING
OEVED
DEVED
(it availab)e)
it available
ANAL-
a. CONCEN-
b. MASS
AVERAGE
VALUE
b. NO. OF
(il available)
YSES
TRATION
ANAL-
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)CONCEN
(2)MASS
DUEa
EO
SENT
SENT
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
TRATION
YSES
GCIMS FRACTION— BASEINEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (continued)
43B N-Nilro-
sodiphenylamine
86.30-6
Testina
and
reporting
not
required
44B. Phenanthrene
(85.01.8)
45B. Pyrene
(129.00-0)
46B 1,2,4-Tri-
chlorobenzene
20-82-1
GCIMS FRACTION— PESTICIDES
IP Aldnn
(309.00-2)
Testinal
and
reDorting
not
required
2P. -BHC
(319-84-6)
3P. 8 -BHC
(319-85-7)
4P. _' -BHC
(58-89-9)
5P.8 -BHC
(319-86.8)
6P Chlordane
(57-74.9)
7P 4,4'-DDT
(50.29.3)
SP 4,4'-DDE
(72.55-9)
9P 4,4'-DDD
(72.54.8)
IOP Dieldrin
(60 57 1)
I1P.(1 -Endosullan
(115-29-7)
12P. 8 -Endosullan
(115-29-7)
13P. Endosullan
Sulfate
031-07.8
14P. Endrin
(72.20-8)
15P. Endrin
Aldehyde
(7421-93.4
16P. Heplao hlor
76-44-8)
EPA Form 3510.2C (8-90) PAGE V-8 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-9
STF ENV441F.12

EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item I of Form 1) OUTFALL NUMBER
CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-8 1 1 003
1. POLLUTANT
2. MARK'X'
1 3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
5. INTAKE o lional
AND CAS
a. TEST.
b. 9E
c. BE.
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE
c. LONGTERM AVRG. VALUE
d. NO.OF
a. LONG
TERM
NUMBER
INC
LIEVED
LIEVED
it available
davaitable
ANAL-
a. CONCEN.
b. MASS
AVERAGE
VALUE
b. NO.OF
(il available)
dUER
SENT
SENT
I
YSES
TRATION
ANAL.
0
(2) MASS
(1
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MA
(I)CONCEN
(2)MASS
ED
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
TRATION
YSES-
GC/MS FRACTION — PESTICIDES (continued)
17P. Heptachlor
Epoxide
(1024-57.3)
Testinal
and
reportinq
not
required
18P. PCB-1242
(53469.21.9)
19P. PCB-1254
(11097-69-1)
20P. PCB-1221
(11104-28 2)
21P. PCB-1232
(I1141-16-5)
22P. PCB-1248
(12672.29-6)
23P PCB-1260
(11096-82-5)
24P. PCB-1016
(12674-11-2)
25P. Toxaphene
(8001.35.2)
PAGE V-9
Maximum daily flow value used to determine maximum daily mass values; ma)dmum 30-day flow value used to determine ma)dmum 30-day mass value;
long term flow value used to determine long term mass values.
EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90)
STF ENV441F.13

PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE IN THE UNSHADED AREAS ONLY. You may report some or all of EPA I.D. NUMBER (copytrom them 1 of Form 1)
this information on separate sheets (use the same format) instead of completing these pages.
SEE INSTRUCTIONS.
OUTFACE NO.
V. INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS (continuedfrom page 3 of Form 2-C7
006
PART A - You mustprovide the results of at least one analysis for every pollitant in this table. C)m lets one table tot each outfall. See instructions for additional details.
_
2. EFFLUENT
3. UNITS
4. INTAKE o tional)
b.MAXIMUM 3ODAYVALUE
c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE
a. LONG TERM
(specify, blank
1. POLLUTANT
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
it a vaila
ofavailable
d. NO.OF
AVERAGE VALUE
b. NO.OF
a. CONCEN.
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
ANALYSES
TRATION
b. MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
ANALYSES
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
a. Biochemical
Oxyygen Demand
(BOD)
1.0
0.27
1
m A
kg/day
to Chemical
Ox gen Demand
(COD)
<25
1
MCA
c Total Or anic
Carbon (TIC)
2.4
0.65
1
nrA
k /da
of Total Suspended
Solids (TSS)
24.0
6.5
15.7
3.1
5.3
0.50
24
m AI
kg/day
e. Ammonia (as N)
1
0.12
1 0.03
1
m A
k da
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
I. Flow
0.072
0.052
0.025
24
MGD
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
g Temperature
T
(winter)
--
--
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
h Temperature
"C
Summer
25
1
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
PH
6.2
1 6.0
1
52
STANDARD UNITS
PARTS - Mark 'X" in column 2-a lot each pollutant you know or have reason to believe is present. Mark 'X' in column
2-b for each pollutant you believe to be absent If you mark column 2a for any pollutant
which is limited either directly, or indirectly but expressly, in an effluent limitations guideline, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. For other pollutants for which you mark
column 2a, you must provide quantitative data or an explanation of their presence in your discharge. Complete one table for each outfall. See the instructions for additional details and requirements.
1. POLLU.
2. MARK
'X'
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
5. INTAKE o tional
TAINT AND
a. BE
6. BE-
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b.MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE
c. LONG TERM AVRG.
VALUE
a. L NG TERM
b. NO. OF
CAS NO.
LIEVED
LIEVED(if
avaitable)
(if available)
d. NO. OF
a. CONCEN.
b. MASS
AVERAGE VALUE
ANAL.
(d available)
PRE.
ANAL-
TRATION
(1)
(2)MAS
(1)
(2)MA
(1)
(2)MA
S
SENT
SENT
CONCENTRATION
I
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
YSES
CONCENTRATION
a Bromide
(24959-67.9)
X
<1.0
-^
1
m A
_-
b Chlorine,
Total Residual
X
1 0.10
0.03
1
m A
kg/day
c Color
X
20
1
CPU
NA
d Fecal
Coldorm
X
14
1
COV100m1
NA
e Fluoride
(16984-48-8)
X
0.3
0.08
1
m A
k /da
I Nitrate -
Nine e (as N)
X
0.44
0.12
1 1
m A
I k /da
EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90)
PAGE V-1
CONTINUE ON REVERSE
STF ENV441 F.5

ITEM V-B CONTINUED FROM FRONT
1. POLLU-
2. MARK
W
3. EFFLUENT
1 4. UNITS
S. INTAKE (optional)
TANT AND
a. BE.
It, BE
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE
c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE
d. NO. OF
a. LONG TERM
CAS NO.
LIEVED
LIEVEb
trial liable
it available
ANAL-
a. CONCEN-
It. MASS
AVERAGE VALUE
b. NO. OF
(il available)
PRE
SENT
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
YSES
TRATION
(1)
(2)MASS
ANAL -
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
YSES
g Nitrogen,
Total nic
as NOrga
X
< 0.22
1
m A
It Oil and
Grease
X
<5,
1
m A
i. Phosphorus
(otal
7723-14 0)
X
0.023
0.006
1
m A
kg/day
I Radioactivity
(1) Alpha,
Total
X
<2.02
1
pciA
(2) Beta,
rural
X
3.98
1 E-6
1
DCiA
C✓da
(3) Radium,
total
Testino
and
reportinq
not
required
(4) Rad
226, T°'al
Testing
and
reporting
not
required
k Sulfate
esso')
(14808-79-8)
X
170
46
1
m A
1 Sulfide
(as S)
X
< 1.0
-
1
mA
_
m Sulfite
(14265-
5-3
X
< 2.0
-
11
nTA
n Surlactants
X
0.5
0.14
1
m A
k /da
o Aluminum,
Total
7429.90-5
X
200
55
1
m A
k /da
p Barium,
Total
7440.39-3
X
< 500
1
m A
q Boron,
Total
7440-42-8
X
< 0.1
1
m A
r Cobalt,
Total
7440-48.4
X
< 0.05
1
m A
s Iran,
Total
p43989-6
X
0.2$
Q.Q$
1
m A
k /da
t Magnesium,
Total
7439.95-4
X
15
4
1
m /I
k /da
u. Molybdenum,
T ota I
7439-98.7
X
< 0.05
1
m oA
v. Manganese,
Total
7439.96.5
X
0.26
0.07
1
m A
k /da
w Tin, Total
(7440 31-5)
X
< 0.1
1
m A
x. Titanium,
Total
(7440.32-6)
X I
< 50
1
m /I
-
PAGE V-2 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-3
STF ENV441F.9

CPA I.U. INUMtltll (Copy
CONTINUED FROM PAGE 3 OF FORM 2-C
,1 1
PART C - If you are a primary industry and this outfall contains process wastewater, refer to Table 2c-2 in the instructions to determine which of the GC/MS fractions you must test for. Mark W in Column
2-a for all such GC/MS fractions that apply to your industry and for ALL toxic metals, cyanides, and total phenols. If you are not required to mark column 2-a (secondary industries, nonprocess
wastewater outfalls, and nonrequired GC/MS fractions), mark "X" in column 2-b for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe is present. Mark "X" in column 2-c for each pollutant you
believe is absent. If you mark column 2a for any pollutant, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. If you mark column 2b for any pollutant, you must provide the results -
of at least one analysis for that pollutant if you know or have reason to believe it will be discharged in concentrations of 10 ppb or greater. If you mark column 21D for acrolein, acrylonitrile, 2,4
dinitrophenol, or 2-methyl-4, 6 dinitrophenol, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for each of these pollutants which you know or have reason to believe that you discharge in
concentrations of 100 ppb or greater. Otherwise, for pollutants for which you mark column 2b, you must either submit at least one analysis or briefly describe the reasons the pollutant is expected to
be discharged. Note that there are 7 pages to this part; please review each carefully. Complete one table (all 7pages) for each outfall. See instructions for additional details and requirements.
1. POLLUTANT
2. MARK W
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
5. INTAKE (option
AND CAS
4. TEST.
b. BE-
c. BE.
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b. MAXIM UM 30 DAY VALUE
c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE
d. NO. OF
a. LONG TERM
NUMBER
ING
LIEVED
LIEVEO
(davailable)
(it available)
ANAL-
■. CONCEN.
b. MASS
AVERAGE VALUE
b. NO. OF
(if available)
DUER.
SENT
SENT
YSES
TRATION
ANAL-
(1)
(2) A
(1)
(2) A
(1)
(2) A
(1)CONCEN
(2)MASS
Eb
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
TRATION
YSES
M ETALS, CYANIDE, AND TOTAL PHENOLS
1M. Antimony,
Total(7440.36-0)
X
X
<0.05
-
1
m atil
2M Arsenic,
Total (7440.38-2)
X
X
< 10
1
LI/I
3M Beryllium,
Total, 7440-41-7)
X
X
< 0.02--
4M Cadmium,
Total (7440-43-9)
X
X
< 2
1
U /I
5M. Chromium,
Total(7440-47-3)
X
X
< 55
1
U I
6M Copper,
Total(7440-50.8)
X
X
4.0
1.09
1
Liall
k da
7M Lead,
Total(7439-92.1)
X
X
<10
__
1
U /I
BM. Mercury,
Total (7439-97-6)
X
X
< 0.2
1
U /I
9M. Nickel,
Total (7440 02-0)
X
X
< 10
1
U 1
10M Selenium,
Total(7782.49.2)
X
X
<5
1
u /I
11M Silver,
Total(7440-22-4)
X
X
<0.01
1
m /I
12M. Thallium,
Total (7440.28.0)
X
X
< 0.01
1 1
mat]
13M Zinc,
Total(7440.66.6)
X
X
1 31
8.4
1
1 LI/I
I k /da
14M. Cyanide,
Total(57-12-5)
X
X
<0.01
1
TTl CIA
15M. Phenols,
Total
X
X
0.005
0.001
1
DIOXIN
2,3,7,8 Tetra-
RESULTS
chlorodibenzo-P-
Dioxin (1764.01-6)
FF
FJOSCRIBE
EPA Farm 55ru-2c (o-au) PAGE V-3 CONTINUE ON REVERSE
STF ENV441F.7

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
1. POLLUTANT
2. MARK
1 3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
S. INTAKE (Optional)
AND CAS
a. TEST.
e. aE
c. aE-
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b. MAXIM UM 30 DAY VALUE
c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE
E. NO. OF
a. LONG
TERM
NUMBER
ING
11EVED
uEVED
it available
it available
ANAL-
a. CONCEN-
b. MASS
AVERAGE
VALUE
b. NO. OF
(il available)
GUIR
SExT
SENT
YSES
TRATION
ANAL-
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)CONCEN
(2)MASS
ED
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
TRATION
YSES
GCIM S FRACTION —VOLATILE COMPOUNDS
IV. Acrolein
(107-02-8)
X
x
<5
1
U
2V Acrylonilrile
(107-13-1)
x
X
< 5
1
U 1
3V. Benzene
(71.43.2)
x
x
< 5
1
U n
4V. Bi3 (Chloro.
methyl) Elher
(542-88-1)
Testing
and
reporting
not
required
5V. Bromoform
(75-25 2)
X
x
<5
1
U /1
6V Carbon
Tetrachloride
(56.23.5)
x
X
I <5
1
U /1
--
7V. Chloroben.
zene (108.90-7)
x
x
<6
1
U /1
8V Chlotodi-
bromomelhane
(124 46-1)
X
X
<5
U /1
9V Chloroelhane
(75-00-3)
x
x
<10
1
u /1
10V. 2-Chloto-
elhylvinyl Elher
(110-75-8)
x
I
I x
I <10
1
U /1
11V Chloroform
(67-66-3)
x
X
<5
1
U n
12V Dichloro-
bromomelhane
(75 27-4)
x
x
<5
1
U /1
13V. Dichloro.
difluoromelhane
(75-71.8)
Testing
and
reporting
not
required
14V 1,1-Dichloro.
ethane (75-34.3)
X
X
<5
1
U /1
15V. 1,2.Dichloro.
ethane T 07.06.2)
x
x
1 <5
1
U /1
16V. 1,1-Dichloro.
ethylene (75-35-4)
X
x
<5
1
U /1
17V 1,2-Dichloro.
propane (78-87-5)
X
X
<6
1
U /1
--
18V 1,3.Dichloro.
propylene(542-75-6)
X
x
<5
__
1
U 1
19V Ethylbenzene
(100-41.4)
x
x
<8
"—
1
U n
20V. Melhyl
Bromide (74-83-9)
x
x
<10
__
1tu
I
21V. Melhyl
Chloride (7487-3)
X
x
<10
1U
/1
--
EPA Form 3b1D-zC (e-SO) PAGE V-4 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-5
STF ENV441F.E

NUMBER (copy from Item I of Form 1) OUTFALL NUMBER
EPA I.D.
CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-4 006
1. POLLUTANT
2. MARK 'X'
1 3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
S. INTAKE o tional
AND CAS
a. TEST.
0. aE-
c. BED
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
e. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE
c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE
e. NO.OF
a. LONG
TERM
NUMBER
ING
LIEVIE
uEVEG
ifavailable
vial, liable
ANAL-
o.CONCEN-
b. MASS
AVERAGE
VALUE
It. NO. OF
pl available)
ouEB-
6ExT
SENT
YSES
TRATION
ANAL-
IU
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
(I)CONCEN
(2)MASS
EG
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
iRAT10N
YSES
GCIM S FRACTION— VOLATILE COMPOUNDS (continued)
22V. Methylene
Chloride (75.09.2)
X
X
<5
--
1
U /I
23V 1,1,2,2-Tetra-
-
chloroemane
79-34-5
X
X
<7
1
U /I
24V Tetrachloro.
ethylene (121 18-4)
X
X
<5
1
U I
25V Toluene
(108-88-3)
X
X
<6
1
U /1
26V 1,2-Trans-
DiChloroethylene
156-60-5
X
X
<5
—
1
U /1
--
27V 1,1,1 Tri.chl
ane
(71o55e6
X
X
<5
1
u /1
--
28V 1,1,2-Tn
chloroethane
79-00-5
X
X
<5
1
u 1
29V Trichloro-
elhylene(79.Ot-6)
X
X
<5
1
U I
--
30V Trichloro-
Iluoromethane
(75 694)
X
X
<10
1
uQA
31V Vinyl
Chloride(75-01-4)
X
X
<10
1
U 1
--
GC/MS FRACTION — ACID COMPOUNDS
1A. 2-Chloro-
phenol (95-57-8)
X
X
<10
1
U /1
2A. 2,4-Dichlora-
phenol(120.83.2)
X
X
<10
1
U /I
3A 2,4-Dimelhyl-
phenol (105.67.9)
X
X
<10
.•.•
1
U /1
4A 4,8-Dinitro-0-
Cresol (534-52-1)
X
X
<50
1
U I
5A. 2,4-Dinilro.
phenol(51.28-5)
X
I X
I <50
__
1
U /I
6A 2-1,111rophenol
(88.75-5)
X
X
<10
1
U /1
7A 4-Nitrophenol
(100-02 7)
X
X
<50
--
1
u /I
—
BA. P-Chloro-M-
Cresol(59-50.7)
X
X
<10
U /I
9A Pentachloro-
phenol(87-86.5)
X
X
<50
--
1
u /1
10A. Phenol
(108.95.2)
X
X
I <10
-. •.
1
U /1
—
11A. 2 d,6 Tri
chlorophenol
(88.06.2)
X
X
<10
1
U /I
--
EPA Form 3510.2C (8-90) PAGE V-5 CONTINUE ON REVERSE
STF ENV441F.9

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
I.POLLUTANT
2. MARK W
3. EFFLUENT
I. UNITS
5.INTAKE (optional)
AND CAS
a. TEST.
b. BE
a. BE.
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b. MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE
c. LONG TERM AVRG. VALUE
D. NO.O
A. LONG TERM
NUMBER
ING
LIEVED
LIEVED
(it available)
it available
ANAL-
a. CONCEN.
b. MASS
AVERAGE VALUE
b. NO. OF
(it available)
OUER-
SENT
SENT
11)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
YSES
TRATION
(1)CONCEN
(2)MASS
ANAL.
ED
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
TRATION
YSES
GC/MS FRACTION — BASEINEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
18 Acenaphthene
(83-32-9)
Testing
and
reporting
not
required
2B. Acenaphtylene
(208.96-8)
3B Anthracene
(120 12-7)
48 Benzi0ine
(92.87-5)
5B Benza (a)
Anthracene
56-55.3
6B. Benzo (a)
Pyrene (50.32-8)
7B. 3,4-Benzo.
Iluoranlhene
205.99-2)
88 Benzo (ght)
Perylene
91-24-2
9B Benzo (k)
Fluoranthene
207-08-9
108. Bis (2-Chloro
ethoxy) Methane
11-91-1
1 t B. Bis (2-ChlorD-
ethyl) Ether
11 44.4
128 Bis (2-CNoms4
pmpyl) Elhel (102 60 I)
138. Bis (2-Ethyl-
hexyl) Phthelale
17 81.7
14B 4.Bromo.
phenyl Phenyl
Ether 101-55.3
158. Butyl Benzyl
Phlhalate (85-68.7)
168. 2-Chloro-
naphthalene
9b58-7
17B. 4-Chloro
phenyl Phenyl
Ether 7005.723
18B. Chrysene
(218.01-9)
19B Dibenzo Ia. h)
Anthracene
53-70-3
20B 1,2-Dichloro-
benzene(95-50.1)
21B 1,3.Dichloro-
benzene(541-73.1)
e Fnrm ._
-On
CONTINUE OR-PA�aEY-T
STF ENV441F.10

EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item 1 of Form 1) OUTFALL NUMBER
CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-6 I I nnR
1. POLLUTANT
2. MARK'X'
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
S. INTAKE (optional)
AND CAS
..TEST-
6. 9E.
c. BE.
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b.MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE
D. LONGTERM AVRG. VALUE
d. NO.OF
a. LONG
TERM
NUMBER
ING
RE
LIEVED
PRE
LIEVED
A
I
if available
if available
ANAL-
a. CONCEN-
b. MASS
AVERAGE
VALUE
It. NO. OF
(If available)
OUIN-
SENT
SENT
1 (1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
YSES
TRATION
(p CONCEN
(2)MASS
ANAL-
ED
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
TRATION
YSES
GC/MS FRACTION — BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (continued)
228. 1.4-Dichloro-
benzene(106.46.7)
Testing
and
reDortina
not
required
23B. 3,3'-Dichloro-
benzidine
91 94.1
24B. Diethyl
Phthalate
(84-66-2
258. Dimethyl
Phthalate
(131 11-3
266 Di-N-Butyl
Phthalate
84.74-2
27B. 2A.Dinitro.
toluene (121.14.2)
286 2,6-Dinitro.
toluene (606.20.2)
298 Di-N-Octyl
Phthatale
17 84-0)
30B 1,2-Diphenyb
hydrazine (as Azo-
benzene) (122.66-7
31B Fluoranthene
(206.44-0)
32B. Fluorene
(86-73-7)
33B. Hexachloro.
benzene(118.74.1)
34B. Hexachloro.
butadiene (87 66-3)
35B. Hexachloro.
cyclopentadiene
7-47 4
368 Hexachloro-
ethane (67.72-1)
37B. Indeno
(1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
93 39-5
38B. Isophorone
(78-59-1)
aphthalene3)itrobenzene3)-Nitroso.tamine9-Nitrosodi.ylamine-7
R
�• 1�-wr PAGE V-7 CONTINUE ON REVERSE
STF ENV44Y1FA1

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
I.POLLUTANT
2. MARK'%'
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
S. INTAKE (option
AND CAS
a. TEST.
e. BE-
c, BE
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b. MAXIM UM 30 DAY VALUE
c. LONGTERM AVRG. VALUE
d. NO.OF
a. LONG
TERM
NUMBER
IxG
u6v86
u6y66
(il available)
itavailable
ANAL-
a. CONCEN.
b. MASS
AVERAGE
VALUE
b. NO. OF
pl available/
pO R-
SENT
SENT
YSES
TRATION
Al
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
(I(CONCEN
(2)MASS
Eb
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
TRATION
YSES
GC/MS FRACTION — BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (continued)
43B. N-Nitro.
sodiphenylamine
86.30.E
Testing
and
reporting
not
required
44B Phenanthrene
(85 01-6)
45B Pyrene
(129.00.0)
46B 1,24-Tri.
chlorobenzene
20-82-1
GC/MS FRACTION— PESTICIDES
1P Aldrin
(309-00-2)
Testinq
and
I ina
I not
required
2P Q BHC
(319-84-6)
3P -BHC
(319.85-7)
4P.7 -BHC
(58.89-9)
5P 8 -BHC
(319-86-8)
6P Chlordane
(57.74.9)
7P 4,4'-DDT
(50.29.3)
8P. 4,4'-DOE
(72.55.9)
9P. 4,4'-DDD
(72 54 8)
IOP. Dieldrin
(60 57-1)
QEndosu Ilan
29-7)
Q-Endosullan
29-7)
Endosullan
te
.07.6
3(76-44-8)1
Endrin
0.8)
Endrin
yde
-93-4
Heptachlor
4.8)
EPA Form 3510-2C (8.90) PAGE V-8 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-9
STF ENV441F.12

EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item I of Form 1) OUTFALL NUMBER
CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-9 1 1 006
1. POLLUTANT
1 2. MARK
1 3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
$.INTAKE o tional
AND CAS
4, TEST.
b. BE.
c. BE-
A. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b.MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE
c. LONGTERM AVRG. VALUE
d. NO.OF
a. LONG
TERM
NUMBER
ING
LIEVEO
LIEVED(ifavailable)
ifavailable)
ANAL-
a.CONCEN.
b. MASS
AVERAGE
VALUE
b. NO. OF
(if available)
QUIR.
SENT
SENT
YSES
TRATION
ANAL-
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
(1)
(2)MASS
(I)CONCEN
(2)MASS
ED
1 CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
TRATION
YSES
GCIMS FRACTION — PESTICIDES (continuer)
17P. Heptachlor
Epoxide
(1024.57.3)
Testina
d
reportinq
not
required
_
18P. PCB-1242
(53469-21-9)
19P. PCB 1254
(11097-69-1)
20P. PCB-1221
(11104.28-2)
21P PCB-1232
(11141-16-5)
22P PCB-1248
(12672-29 6)
23P PCB-1260
(11096-82-5)
24P. PCB-1016
(72674-11.2)
25P. Toxaphene
(8001.35.2)
PAGE V-9
Maximum daily flow value used to determine maximum daily mass values; maximum 30-day flow value used to determine maximum 30day mass value;
long term flow value used to determine long term mass values. Sample analyses from monthly monitoring reports and previous permit renewal sampling
due to the unchanging characterization of the effluent (DWQ concurrence on sample analyses used).
EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90)
STF ENV441 F.13

CW IS - I Source water is Lake.
Intake structure has 8 intake bays at corner of intake canal cove.
CW IS - 2 Source water is Lake.
Intake is supplemental and consists of submerged gated pipes.
CW IS - 4 Source water is cooling
canal. Intake has 1 bay.
Stormwater
Plant Process
Plant Drainage
400.000 Lake
gpd
Streams
System
Coal Pile Runoff
Treatment Basin
Outfall 006
(operational)
a
0
Low Volume
Alternate to
o(Oil/Water
Domestic
Collection Sump
Sewage Discharge Cana
Water Treatment
Separator)
Waste
Treatment Plant *'*'*"* ............
Systems
15,000 gpd
21,600,000 qpd
3,000,000 gpd
m
C
19,250,
Outfall 005
a
O
Unit 4 Cooling
Unit 4 Cooling
To Atmosphere Ash Transport
System
Ash Landfill
Ash Pond
Drainage
d
Water
47,280,000
7,000,000 gpd v
Tower o
s
a
o
0
Maintenance Drain o
E00
gpd t...................................................................................................
o O !�
U
n
S Stormwater m 0
V
Unit Cooling
Unit 3 Cooling
To Atmosphere c
n s O
3
Water'
Tower
Silo Wash Water :nit Cooling a
U
d
505,000,000 gpd a
Tower Pond
d
a
Alternative modes
0
y
o
505,440,000 gpd
Lake
3
U
0
o
0
Outfall 003 (Operational)
N
Unit 1 & 2
1.075,000,000 gpd
Cooling Water
Discharge Canal
Attachment 1
Stormwater
Form 2C - Item II - A Flows, Sources of
Pollution, and Treatment Technologies
1998 Flow Data
Page 1 October 2001

• . Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Attachment 2
Form 2C - Item II-B Flows, Sources of Pollution, and Treatment Technologies
The Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, located in Person County, North Carolina, consists of four coal
fired generating units with net dependable capacities of 385, 670, 707, and 700 MWe for units 1, 2, 3,
and 4 respectively. All plant waste streams are routed directly or indirectly to the Hyco Reservoir.
Chemical constituents contained in these discharges will, in part, be representative of the naturally
occurring chemical quality and quantity of the intake water and will also have chemical constituents of
such quality associated with similar discharges for fossil generating facilities of this size, type, and in
this geographical location. Either all or part of the elements in the Periodic Table, either singularly or
in any combination, may from time to time be contained in the discharges. Each component of the
discharges is described below.
Outfall 003 - Discharge Canal
At the point that the discharge canal enters the Hyco Reservoir, it contains the flows from several waste
streams, including once -through cooling water, stormwater runoff, and the effluent from the ash pond,
which in turn receives and treats combined flows from the ash transport system, the low volume waste
system, the dry fly ash handling system, cooling tower blowdown, stormwater runoff, and drainage
from the ash landfill.
Once -Through Cooling Water
Condenser Cooling Water (CCW) for units 1, 2, and 3 is drawn from the Hyco Reservoir via an
intake canal and discharges to the Hyco Reservoir via a discharge canal. Flows for units 1, 2,
and 3 are 249 MGD, 342 MGD, and 505 MGD respectively. Cooling is accomplished by
evaporation from the surface of Hyco Reservoir and mixing and convection with the reservoir
waters.
During the summer months, unit 3 CCW is routed through mechanical draft cooling towers
1

• .,arolina Power & Light Compare,
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
where most of the waste heat is removed by evaporation before the water is discharged to the
reservoir via the discharge canal along with the CCW of units I and 2. Additionally, once -
through cooling water is used as component closed cooling water, the flow of which is
combined with the CCW prior to introduction into the discharge canal.
Ash Pond Discharge
The ash pond receives ash transport water, low volume wastes, runoff from the ash landfill, dry
fly ash handling system wash water, blowdown from Unit 4 cooling tower, coal mill rejects and
pyrites, and sewage treatment plant effluent. The pond provides treatment by sedimentation,
oxidation, neutralization, equalization, and adsorption.
Ash Transport Water
Water for sluicing ash to the ash pond is withdrawn from the CCW system as needed.
The plant will primarily supply ash sluice water from Unit 2. However, the facility will
continue to maintain the ability to operate the unit 4 ash sluice pumps. The Unit 4 ash
sluice pumps are and will continue to be utilized for the following i) during maintenance
draining of the cooling tower, ii) back-up supply for the fire suppressant system, and iii)
ash sluicing pumps during operational events which require additional pumping.
Normally, only bottom ash is conveyed to the ash pond by sluicing: fly ash is handled
dry by a pneumatic system and is landfilled on site or sold. If the dry fly ash handling
system is out of service during plant operating periods, fly ash will be sent to the ash
pond via the ash sluicing systems until the dry system is restored. Such occurrences are
expected to be infrequent and brief.
Silo Wash Water
Ash silo wash water runoff and dust suppressant spray runoff from the dry fly ash
handling system are routed to the ash pond.
Low Volume Wastes
Boiler make-up water is withdrawn from the CCW system and filtered, softened, and
2

.a
Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
demineralizered for treatment. Boiler water is treated with ammonia, hydrazine, and
occasionally sodium hydroxide. Boiler blowdown is sent to the ash pond via the low
volume wastes collection system (LVWS); these are special drains in the plant that flow
by gravity to collection sumps and are pumped to the ash pond. Ethylene glycol is used
for freeze protection of some equipment and may be discharged to the LVWS, as is
some molybdate waste from the closed cooling water system, during periods of
maintenance. The plant's demineralizers are regenerated using sulfuric acid and sodium
hydroxide. When this equipment is rinsed, small amounts of these chemicals are
discharged to the low volume system via the neutralization basin. Essentially all plant
equipment, floor drains, water treatment filter backwashes, clarifier and sedimentation
basin sludge, and ash hopper seal water overflow also discharge to the LVWS. In
addition, a back-up domestic sewage system can discharge to the LVWS. The back-up
system consists of a septic tank with a subsurface sand filter and a chlorine dosing
chamber. The back-up system can be used if the facility's extended aeration treatment
system is temporarily out of service.
Cooling Tower Blowdown
Unit 4 is the only unit that would produce cooling tower blowdown. Blowdown to the
ash pond may be required to keep concentrations of total dissolved solids to within
proper operating limits.
Domestic Sewage
Domestic sewage from approximately 227 employees and 35 contractors and occasional
extra contract maintenance employees is treated by an extended aeration treatment plant
consisting of a screen, comminutor, surge tank, aeration tank, clarifier, chlorine contact
chamber, and a sludge holding tank.
Coal Pile Runoff'
The solids settling basin, which contains a portion of the wastewater runoff from the
coal pile and other coal handling areas of the plant, is routed to the ash pond.
3

w
i
Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Ash Landfill Drainage
Water for sluicing a minimum amount of bottom ash to the ash landfill is withdrawn
from the ash transport system as needed. The bottom ash is used to enhance the
subsurface drainage of the landfill.
Stormwater Runoff
The stormwater runoff, which flows into the ash pond includes runoff from the plant
drainage area, landfill runoff (including silo area drainage), and the drainage area from
the ash pond (including roadways).
Stormwater Runoff
The stormwater, which flows into the discharge canal includes runoff from the plant drainage
area, the drainage area from the dry flyash handling system (including roadways), Unit 4
cooling tower drainage area, the fuel oil storage containment area, the switchyard drainage area,
and the anhydrous ammonia tank farm.
Outfall 006 — Coal Pile Runoff
Wastewater runoff from the coal pile and other coal handling areas of the plant is routed to a retention
pond for treatment by neutralization, sedimentation, and equalization. The pond is designed to store in
excess of the 10-year/24-hour storm event. Releases are controlled by a standpipe and skimmer
discharge structure.
11

uarolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Attachment 3
Form 2C - Item VI Potential Discharges Not Covered By Analysis
Chemical
Quantity
(used per year)
Frequency
Purpose
Anhydrous Ammonia
14,000 gal/wk
per unit
As required
(Seasonal)
Flue Gas Conditioning
Betz Powerline 3200
385 gals.
As required
Corrosion Inhibitor
Betz Polymer 1120P
250 lbs.
As required
Water Treatment
Betz 3625 Biocide
2300 gals.
As required
Unit 4 Cooling Tower
Algae Control
Betz Foam Trol
630 gals.
As required
Unit 4 Cooling Tower
Foam Control
Betz 500P
110 gals.
Twice per day
Corrosion Inhibitor
Potable Water
Ice Free Conveyer
750 gals.
2100 lbs.
As required
Conveyer Belt Freeze
Protection
Aluminum Sulfate
4000 gals.
As required
Water Treatment
Sodium Chloride
100,000 lbs.
As required
Softener Regeneration
Sulfuric Acid
13,000 gals.
Twice per week
Demineralizer Regeneration
Sodium Hydroxide
15,000 gals.
Twice per week
Demineralizer Regeneration
Ethylene Glycol
6,000 gals.
As required
Freeze Protection Hot
Water Coil System
Lime
2,500 lbs.
As required
Wastewater pH Control
Hydrazine
1,760 gals.
As required
Feedwater Oxygen
1

�-arolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Scavenger
Ammonia Hydroxide
1,760 gals.
As required
Boiler Water pH Control
Sodium Hydroxide
200 lbs.
As required
Boiler Water pH Control
Sodium Hypochlorite
400 gals.
Twice per day
Potable Water Treatment
Dusbloc 520W
40, 000 lbs.
As required
Dust Suppressant
Sodium Bicarbonate
10,000 lbs.
As required
Wastewater pH Control
Caustic Soda (20%)
110 gals.
Twice per day
Potable Water pH Control
Molten Sulfur
525,000 lbs.
As required
Flue Gas Conditioning
Sanuril Tablets
135 lbs.
As required
Biocide for Sewage
Treatment
Nalclean
200 lbs.
As required
Softened Water System

State of North %,arolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Govemor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 7, 2001
Mr. Cecil E. Rowland, Plant Manager
Carolina Power and Light Company
1700 Dunnaway Rd.
Semora, NC 27343
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Roxboro Steam Electric Generating Plant
NPDES Permit No. NC0003425
Person County
Dear Mr. Rowland:
NCDENR
NORrri Cl OUi D*� of
ENVIRONMENT Y o NAr . Re RcF
f
D6VI
�z 61a313
On February 12, 2001, Mr. kirk Stafford, of the Raleigh Regional Office of the Division,
conducted a Compliance Evaluation Inspection of the subject facility accompanied by Mr.
Ronald Wolfe, Ms. Joanie Cooke, and Mr. Robert Howard. Their cooperation and assistance was
helpful and appreciated. As a result of the inspection, the following items were noted.
1. There are five permitted discharge pipes under the current permit. Pipe 002 is the ash
pond treatment system, 003 is the heated water discharge canal system, 005 is cooling
tower water blowdown system, 006 is the coal pile runoff treatment system, and 008 is
domestic wastewater treatment system
2. The subject permit became effective March 1, 1998 and expires on April 30, 2002.
3. The discharge from the ash pond (002) appeared clear and free of excess solids.
4. The discharge from the wastewater treatment plant (008) appeared clear and free of
excess solids.
5. A review of the self monitoring data submitted from September 1999 through August
2000 showed compliance with all permit parameters for all outfalis except noted in item
# 13 of this report.
6. The ORC logbook, the pH calibration log book, and the sample refrigerator logbook
are all being kept in accordance with the requirements of 15A NCAC 2B .0506c (3).
1828 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

s
ROXBORO STEAM CEI
PAGE TWO
7. Soloman Sanitary hauls the sludge from the wastewater treatment plant and
disposes of it at the City of Roxboro wastewater treatment plant.
8. A review of laboratory data and self -monitoring data showed consistent
reporting of results.
9. At the time of inspection, the wastewater treatment plant appeared to be functioning
properly. In addition, chlorine was present in the chlorinator.
10. The five Acute Toxicity test results for the period December 1999 through December
2000 for outfall 003 were recorded as "PASS" for all tests.
11. Acute Toxicity test results for the calender year 2000 for outfall 006 were recorded as
"PASS".
12. The subject facility is Class II and Training and Certification Section has Robert
Howard Grade II operator recorded as ORC and Eric Satterwhite Grade II operator
recorded as backup operator.
13. It was noted for outfall 003, Heated Water Discharge Canal System, that Kjeldahl
Nitrogen is being reported asTotal Nitrogen. Please be aware that Total Nitrogen is
Kjeldahl Nitrogen plus Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen. Please amend the DMR's for the period
of this review and submit to the division with "AMENDED" noted at the top of the
DMR.
If you have any questions concerning this correspondence or if this office can be of
assistance, please call me at 919-571-4700.
Sincerely,
Kirk Stafford
Environmental Chemist
cc: Maurice Horsey -EPA
Joanie Cooke-CP&L
Central Files

�1
United Ste.. Emir« arrt.l Protection Agency Form Approved.
we.h:,gtcr, D.C. 2o4eo
V OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance 1 o Report Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National DstsSystem Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/rtlo/dayInspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1I_J L5J 1�Y : 10
Vl un 1Fi4
7tI1S'1 12101/16tq' 17 1arJ 19-L20
Remarks 1 I
L-1
2111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111116E
Inspection Work Days Facday Self -Monitoring Eyaluetan Rating B1 CIA rved -
I6711169 701J 711_1 72U 731_ 1 174 761 1 . 1 - 1-__1 _-1_ 1 I60
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected lFor industrial users discharging to POTW, also Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date
include POTW name and NPDES permit number) ` 3/,L AryYt /
cr' 01
it Time[Da te Permit Expiration Date
Namels) of On -Site Representative(s)Ttle(s)/Phone and Fax Numbar(s) Other Facility Data
,T0)kKca C,a
Name, Addrf Responsible Off itle hone and Fax Number
C� e ou?Lrt->u l� ��/T�Vi IL contacted
( > o lei NNIkt,O, ).tom 41 Yes VNc
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated]
Permit ow Measurement k
Operations & CSOISSO (Sewer Overflow)
Maintenance
.cords/Reports Self -Monitoring ProgramSludge Handling/Disposal Pollution Prevention
FacilitySite Revew Compliance SchedulesPretreatment Multimedia
Effluent/Receiving Waters I I Laboratory
Storm Water
Other:
Section D: Summary of Findings/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) I
Name(s) and naturals of Inspector(s)
Aoency/Otfm� ne and/Fax N/u/mCbe]rrsj Date (/
ox—
Signature of Management Q. A Reviewer
I Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
1
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-941 Previous editions are obsolete.

CP&L
Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Electric Generating Plant
1700 Dunnaway Rd
Semora, NC 27343
File: 12520J
Timothy D. Baldwin
Raleigh Regional Office
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
3800 Barrett Drive
PO Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27609
Or - Carolyn M. Jungclas
JUN 16 ��
Plant Manager
'I � +
L -- I
DEHNR RALEIGH REGIW AL OFFICE June 14, 2000
Subject: Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Generating Plant, Person County
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit Number NC0003425
Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report Response
Dear Mr. Baldwin:
On May 9, 2000, a compliance evaluation inspection was conducted at the above -referenced certified facility. An
inspection report, dated May 19, 2000, was subsequently provided to the facility. Pursuant to your request in the
report, listed below is the response to items 3 and 4.
Item 3:
The DMRs for the last 12 months (March, 1999, to February, 2000) were reviewed for compliance
with permit limits and monitoring requirements. No violations were noticed. It was noticed that
CP&L's interpretation of the "biweekly" sampling requirements for Selenium on Clutfall 002 is to
test 5 days a week, every other week. This office would presently interpret "biweekly" to mean
one sample every other week. You are currently covering this requirement, however, you appear
to be doing more testing than is required. For now, an agreeable definition should be placed in our
file, and a note should be made that the word "biweekly" should be replaced in the permit with
"2/month" or better defined when the next permit modification or renewals occurs. Please send a
copy of any correspondence with the Division that defines "biweekly" or provide a proposed
definition (such as your current interpretation).
Please clarify whether or not the Cane Creek temperature readings are outside the mixing zone and
have to meet Water Quality Standards. The temperature readings were >32 degrees Celsius on
July 6, 7, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, and August 1, 2.
Response:
Part I Section A.(1) Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements of the NPDES Permit
identifies the monitoring frequency and sample type for Total Selenium as "biweekly" and
"composite", respectively. In addition, Note 2 is referenced for this parameter. Note 2 explicitly
states "Daily grab samples shall be combined into a weekly composite prior to analysis. Sampling
shall be conducted every other week." Hence the definition of "biweekly" and the current method
of sampling conducted by the facility is permit identified.
Cane Creek is the point for sampling for temperature prior to any influence from the plant's
discharge (background temperature). Any readings above 32 degrees Celsius at that point are
naturally occurring.

Item 4:
Laboratory bench sheets, operator log books, commercial lab results, and chain of records were
checked against the DMR for the months of November, 1999, and January, 2000. Everything
appeared to be accurate. It should be noted that the lab results checked were not those of the
commercial laboratory that performed the work, but were provided by the CP&L lab at New Hill
(Harris Plant). It was discovered when checking the temperature logs that there are two record
logs for the same sample point. All analysis results on the effluent must be recorded on the DMR.
If two temperature readings are taken, these values must be averaged together for the DMR value.
It should be noted, however, that only one reading is required.
Response:
Just prior to November, 1999, an equipment change for the temperature recording was made. To
ensure the new equipment was operating properly, backup temperature recording was maintained.
Upon verification of the operation of the new equipment, the backup recording was stopped. No
duality in temperature recording exists subsequent to November, 1999.
Additionally, the CP&L lab located at New Hill is the Harris Energy and Environmental Center's
Laboratory.
If you have any questions or comments concerning this information, please contact Ms. Joame P. Cooke at (919)
362-3553.
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons
who managed the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the
information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. 1 am
aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of
fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
JPC/jpc
c: Ms. Joanie P. Cooke
S cer,ty
Carolyn M. Jungclas
Plant Manager
1
Hwy 57N [phone] - FAX [phone]

bc: Mr. Robert Howard
Mr. Ronnie Wolfe
Mr. Ron Coats
Hwy 57N [phone] - FAX [phone]

AlIb111IS
i
NyCO
06NOND peg
colusl
Al
S � 4•
I /
/ `�i 8P
y!
OV
I
� J
LONG% 610NE
i is ?lb
4
p
a
04 {11ANGL
D
SL TTLING POND
INTAKE
LSOLND
V^ ul OLD DILOIANGL CANALS
DIRT/
r / \
4 w.
e 1 i
YILLWAY
LOCATION M
ROXBORO STEAM ELD
CAROLINA POWER 6
SHT. 1 OF 2

Qom'
NCDENR
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
`e
HOLMAN
eTARY
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 19, 2000
Ms. Carolyn M. Jungclas, Plant Manager
Carolina Power and Light Company
1700 Dunnaway Road
Semora, NC 27343
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
CP&L Roxboro
NPDES Permit No. NC0003425
Person County
Dear Ms. Jungclas:
`7 oc,0r3o
1
/M411! JvFe /t
�e�s �a /`• /2
The subject inspection was performed on May 9, 2000, by Tim Baldwin of this office. The
cooperation of Robert Howard, Ronald Wolfe, and Joanie Cooke was appreciated. Below
is a numerical listing of the findings during our inspection.
1) The current permit for the above mentioned facility became effective on
March 1, 1998, and expires April 30, 2002. The facility is currently rated a
Grade II facility, however, in the future, it will likely have a dual rating of
Grade I Physical/Chemical and Grade H Biological WPCS. The ORC on
record is Robert Howard, who is a Grade II operator.
2) There are currently 5 permitted outfalls. Outfall 002 is for the Ash Pond,
Oufall 003 is for the Heated Water Discharge Canal, Outfall 005 is for the
Cooling Tower Blowdown, Outfall 006 is for the Coal Pile Runoff, and
Outfall 008 is for the Domestic WWTP.
3) The DMRs for the last 12 months (March, 1999, to February, 2000) were
reviewed for compliance with permit limits and monitoring requirements.
No violations were noticed. It was noticed that CP&L's interpretation of the
"biweekly" sampling requirement for Selenium on Outfall 002 is to test 5
days a week, every other week. This office would presently interpret
"biweekly" to mean one sample every other week. You are currently
covering this requirement, however, you appear to be doing more testing
than is required. For now, an agreeable definition should be placed in our
file, and a note should be made that the word "biweekly" should be replaced
in the permit with "2/month" or better defined when the next permit
modification or renewal occurs. Please send a copy of any correspondence
with the Division that defines "biweekly", or provide a proposed
(such as your current interpretation).
1626 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEION, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1628
PHONE O19.571-4700 FAY 919-571-4718
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Ms. Jungclas
May 17, 2000
Page 2
Please clarify whether or not the Cane Creek temperature readings are outside the
mixing zone and have to meet Water Quality Standards. The temperature readings
were >32 degrees Celsius on July 6, 7, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, and August
1, 2.
4) Laboratory bench sheets, operator log books, commercial lab results, and chain of
custody records were checked against the DMR for the months of November, 1999,
and January, 2000. Everything appeared to be accurate. It should be noted that the
lab results checked were not those of the commercial laboratory that performed the
work, but were provided by the CP&L lab at New Hill (Harris Plant). It was
discovered when checking the temperature logs that there are two record logs for the
same sample point. All analysis results on the effluent must be recorded on the
DMR. If two temperature readings are taken, these values must be averaged together
for the DMR value. It should be noted, however, that only one reading is required.
5) Effluent from Outfall 002 (Ash Pond) appeared free of solids and foam. Effluent
from Outfall 003 (Heated Water Discharge Canal) appeared free of solids and foam.
Effluent from Outfall 005 (Cooling Tower Blowdown) had high concentration of
solids, however, it discharges into the Ash Pond for later discharge through Outfalls
002 and 003. There was no effluent from Outfall 006 (Coal Pile Runoff), however,
the pond water appeared free of solids and foam. Effluent from Outfall 008
(Domestic WWTP) was not specifically seen since it is mixed in -pipe with effluent
from Outfall 005 prior to discharge into the Ash Pond.
6) The Domestic W WTP (Outfa11008) was operating during the inspection. There were
chlorine tablets in the chlorinator.
Please respond in writing to items 3 and 4 by June 19, 2000, detailing actions taken by CP&L to
address these items. You are reminded that any violation of the NPDES permit is subject to
enforcement action by this Division and/or the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. If you have
any questions concerning this information please contact me at [phone] ext. 251.
Sincerely,
Vd
TimothyKental
aldwin
Enviro Engineer
cc: Maurice Horsey, EPA
Person County Health Department
Permit # NC0003425
h:\inspect\nc3425.cei

Unit tee Enviroranentsl Protection Agency
EPA Washington, D.C. 204eD
t Water Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
91
1u 2LJ 31NIC 101010131417-15111 12101010151619I 17 ISE 191i1 201L1
LRemarks .� LJ
21111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111166
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating al OA---
67 I I I' 69 701_1 71 ICI 72 1 J 73 L_ j 74 751 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 00
s� +�
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For industrial users discharging to POTW, also
include POTW name and NPDES permit number)
GP' L �ox$�Ro
W
/�ERsU�1I / VA1%t/
Entry Time/Date
�OSUq
/3: 00
Permit Effective Date
g8c)36)1
Exit TimeMate
`'Cos-0 q
Ir. 30
Permit Expiration Date
oZ c)'/3 U
Name(s) of On -Site Rte/presantative(s)/Titie(s)/Phone and Fax Numbar(s)
i2c,dE2T /7oL✓ARb ORC 336- 597-6Z-Z
ic)ANIS CooKE 919 - 31(2 - 3SS-3
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
❑ Yes ❑ No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated/
orts
FFRoview
siving Waters
Flow Measurement
Self -Monitoring Program
Compliance Schedules
Laboratory
Operations &
Maintenance
Sludge Handling/Disposal
Pretreatment
Stomi Water
CSO/SSO (Sewer Overflow)
Pollution Prevention
Multimedia
Other:
Section D: Summary of tttndings/Comments (AAacchh�addit/onal sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
�/Fii/%/
/V ,55Z- �i�//e' 6 Z / � L�/e
Name(s) and Si natures) of Inspector(s)
Agency/OfficelPhon and Fax/Numbers
�,e�F/v( ,�>7/� G✓G7S 2izD
Date
uGUS/�
??
Q UqLh 1ti/^/
Signature of Management Q AA Reviewer
- a -Of t-t I
Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers
0 Lir (I C G-s-�(-4�6u
Date
oO Ds_l y
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
November 19, 1999
Ms. Carolyn M. Jungclas. Plant Manager
Carolina Power `d1 light Company
Roxboro Electric Generating Plant
1700 Dunnaway Rd.
Semora, North Carolina 27343
1
_
•`�16 NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
1
Subject: Permit No. NC0003 5
Guard House Construction
Roxboro Facility
Person County
Dear Ms. Jungclas:
The Division received a letter from you dated November 9, 1999 regarding the installation of a new guard
house on the above referenced site. In your letter you indicate that flows from a sink in the aforementioned house
will be routed to the ash pond. This letter is intended to offer Division of Water Quality concurrence with your
approach for handling flows from the guard house. No Authorization to Construct is necessary for this activity and
the NPDES permit does not need to be modified at this time. Upon renewal. the NPPES permit will be updated to
include flows from the guard house.
This approval does not affect the legal requirement to obtain other permits or judgements which may be
required by other State, Federal, or Local government agencies.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please contact Mark McIntire, telephone
number [phone], extension 553.
Sincerely,
boz'�.4�7 � /L__
David A. Goodrich
NPDES Supervisor
cc: Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center. Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1617 - Telephone [phone]/FAX [phone]
An Eoual Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer - 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
Visit us on the Internet at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES

B z
{
©lWA
NCDENR
JAMES B. HUNT-Ik
GOVERNOR
,'A
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 29, 1999 TT
Ms. Carolyn M. Jungclas, Plant Manager �—
Carolina Power and Light Company �� ggp.401
1700 Dunnaway Road 1
Semora, NC 27343
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Roxboro Steam Electric Generating Plant
NPDES Permit No. NC0003425
Person County
Dear Ms. Jungclas:
On January 26, 1999, Mr. Charles Brown of the Raleigh Regional Office
conducted a inspection of the subject facility accompanied by Mr. Rob Howard and Ms.
Joanie Cooke. Their assistance during the inspection was appreciated. As a result of the
inspection, the following items were noted.
1. The subject permit became effective March 1, 1998 and expires April 30,
2002.
2. The facility currently has five permitted discharges. Discharge pipe 002 is
from the ash pond treatment system, pipe 003 is the heated water discharge
canal, 005 is the cooling tower blowdown system, pipe 006 is the coal pile
runoff treatment system, and pipe 008 is from the domestic wastewater treatment
system.
3. The discharge from the ash pond 002 appeared free of excess solids. The
water was turbid due to the heavy rains in the area previous to the inspection.
4. The discharge from the wastewater treatment plant appeared clear and free of
solids.
5. Soloman Sanitary hauls the sludge from the wastewater treatment plant.
6. The ORC logbook and pH calibration logbook are being maintained
properly.
7. A review of the laboratory data and self monitoring data revealed no
discrepancies in the reporting of results.
9800 BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101. RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
PHONE [phone] FAX PIP-5T1-4718
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -30% RECYCLED/I0 POST -CONSUMER PAPER

CP&L Roxboro Plant CEI
Page 2
8. A review of self monitoring data submitted from April 1998 to November 1998
showed compliance with all permitted parameters.
9. The wastewater treatment plant appeared to be functioning properly and the chlorinator
had chlorine.
10. Toxicity reports were pass for the months of June and September 1998.
If you have any questions concerning this correspondence or if this office can offer
assistance, please contact me at [phone] ext. 245.
Sincerely6
harles Brown
Environmental Technician
cc: Melinda Greene -EPA
Central Files

Cates Environmental Protection Agency
v EPA Washington, D C. 20060
NPDES Compliance Inspection Re ort
P P Repon
Form Approved
OMB No 20400003
Expires 7-31-85
Section A: National Data System Coding
Tra-In-sa`monCo�dde� /yam NPDES ,�.aI� r/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector -FJac IType
ICI `LJ L 0�0�3 �JZ_ 11 12 � 17 1844 19 2C J
Remarks
66
Reserved Facility Evaluation Rating BI p,4 --------- --------- Reserved ---- -------------
6� 1 1 69 7CL6 71U 7�_j 7J_Lj 74 75I BO
Section 8: Facility Data
meand Locatioon, -of Facility In tad %��-^ � �//''
CKJDVD SiCC_ \ 6Ae L 17� ✓Gs�FF15 PL�
J
pe C
CV
Entry Time
®AM ❑ PM
Permit Effective Date
Exit Time/Date
Perm t Expiration Date
'O o z
amets) o n- Represe tative(s)
Ra14L Id Wolf
o C..-6k
Title(s)
E60,00A. Cc�,.d;�
nRc
Phone No(s)
33b
60 2 6
N e, Address of RXgponsible Official
o,,,o�^(ti )ah ycicr6 C Pf-L
17,op �tshh GW G-� Rd
l -1 _
Tit e
P G L
Phone No.
Contacted
❑ Yes L-IcNo
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection
(S = Satisfactory, M = Marginal, U = Unsatisfactory, N = Not Evaluated)
Permit
Records/Reports
Facility Site Review
Flow Measurement
Laboratory
Effluent/Receiving Waters
Pretreatment
Compliance Schedules
Self -Monitoring Program
$
Operations & Maintenance
Sludge Disposal
Other
5
Section D: Summary of Findings/Comments (Attach additional sheets i/necessary)
N s) etur of Inspector(s)
s troLJ^
Agency/Office/Telephone
6mr-e- Dicio — 0220
Date
Signature of Reviewer
Agency/Office
D�'
Date
q o l d8
Regul tory Office Use Only
Action Taken
Date
Compliance Status
E) Noncompliance
LSf'Com liance
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev. 3-86) Previous editions are obsolete.

W
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
J , ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
(� RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 2, 1998
Ms. Carolyn M. Jungclas, Plant Manager
JAMES B. HUNT JR. Carolina Power and Light Company
` VERNOR 1700 Dunnaway Rd.
Semora, NC 27343
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
WAYHE MCDEVITT SECRETARY Roxboro Steam Electric Generating Plant
SECR
NPDES Permit No. NC0003425
Person County
Dear Ms. Jungclas:
On June 1, 1998, Mr. kirk Stafford, of the Raleigh Regional Office of the
Division, conducted a compliance evaluation inspection of the subject facility
accompanied by Mr. Fred Holt, Ms. Joanie Cooke, and Mr. Ronald Wolf. Their
'cooperation and assistance was helpful and appreciated. As a result of the inspection, the
following items were noted.
1. The subject permit became effective March 1, 1998 and expires on April 30,
2002.
2. There are five permitted discharge pipes under the current permit. Pipe 002 is
the ash pond treatment system, 003 is the heated water discharge canal system,
005 is cooling tower water blowdown system, 006 is the coal pile runoff
treatment system, and 008 is the domestic wastewater treatment system.
3. The discharge from the ash pond (002) appeared clear and free of excess
solids.
4. The discharge from the wastewater treatment plant (008) appeared clear and
-
free of excess solids.
5. Soloman Sanitary hauls the sludge from the wastewater treatment plant and
disposes of it at the City of Roxboro wastewater treatment plant.
6. The ORC logbook, the pH calibration log book, and the sample refrigerator
logbook are all being kept in accordance with the requirements of 15A NCAC 2B
....,,
.0506c (3).
k ate;_ :
7. A review of laboratory data and self -monitoring data showed consistent
ka + - --::ter"' --
A
reporting of results.
IP
30M BARRETT DRIVE, SUITE 101 , RALEION, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
- -
PNON9910-871.4700 FAX9I0-571.4716
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 1 AIIIRMATI VE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLEO/1 O% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

ROXBORO STEAM CEI
PAGE TWO
8. A review of the self monitoring data submitted from March 1997 through February
1998 showed compliance with all permit parameters for all outfalls.
9. At the time of inspection, the wastewater treatment plant appeared to be well
maintained and functioning properly. In addition, chlorine was present in the chlorinator.
10. Acute Toxicity test results for the period March 1997 through March 1998 for outfall
003 were recorded as `PASS" for all tests with the exception of December 1997 which
was designated as `BAD TEST". As per the subject permit, an acute test was conducted
the following month in January 1998 and recorded as "PASS".
11. Acute Toxicity test results for the calender year 1997 for outfall 006 were recorded as
"PASS".
12. The subject facility is Class II and Training and Certification Section has Robert
Howard Grade II operator recorded as ORC and Eric Satterwhite Grade II operator
recorded as backup operator. It was noted on the monthly reports that Mr. Satterwhite is
signing as ORC. If you wish to have him designated as ORC, please contact Training and
certification at 919-733-0026.
If you have any questions concerning this correspondence or if this office can be of
assistance, please call Mr. Stafford or myself at 919-571-4700.
Sincerely,
Id! !ett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Melinda Greene -EPA
Joanie Cooke-CP&L
Kirk Stafford
Central Files

Ask
AL
Cates EnvironmentalProtection Agency
EPA Washington, D. C. 20660
ES Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved
OMB No. 2040 0003
Approval Expires 7-31.85
Section A: National Data System Coding
Transaction �Codde ,,I A/�,�/� N��PDIEIS y� yr/mo//day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1u •LJ 9r C141101 U NYra Ss 11 12 1$['Qj t7�a 1 117 1el� 15-s 21�-j
Remarks
Reserved Facility Evaluation Rating
6J_Lj_J 69 7t1 j
66
BI CA ------------------ Reserved -----------------
71L 72LJ 73W 74 75� 80
Section 8: Facility Data
Ame end Location of a,Facility Inspected q— ,�r�
�iGArn e AC. GGIV�R:`�CY/!J
Entry Time AM PM
r
Permit Egec
I
ve �DJate
L7
Exit Time/Date
M 6f�(4g
Permit Expir on Date
oa
Name(s) o n- ite Representative(s)
�ti vAaz�-
Title(s)
�,(►SrZtYL
Phone No(s)
a -�
Name. Address of Responsible,tO�f{(p'c�iall_�
CAgzo GYM �A� VtpC=
B�tA�N JA (�
C- �i �f `'
lr f j
Title P�nrc M AM p,q M
✓
Phone No.
Contactryed
❑Yes LYI No
Section C: Ames Evaluated During Inspection
IS = Satisfactory. M = Marginal, U = Unsatisfactory. N = Not Evaluated)
Permit
Records/Reports
Facility Site Review
Flow Measurement
Laboratory
Effluent/Receiving Waters
N
Pretreatment
Compliance Schedules
Self -Monitoring Program
S
Operations & Ma:ntenance
Sludge Disposal
Other
Section D:
Summary of Findings/Comments (Attach additional sheets if necessary)
Names) and Si n ture(s of Inspector(s)
Agenc /Ofh a/Telep�' c e
pie
Date
I
Signature of Reviewer
Agency/Office
evywl l G
Date
Regulatory Office Use Only
Action Taken
Date
Compliance Status
❑—I /fr,.1oncompliance
compliance
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev. 3-85) Previous editions are obsolete.

State of North Caroli
Department of Envlydlent
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt. Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A- Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Ms. Carolyn Jungclas, Plant Manager
Carolina Power and Light Company
Roxbom Electric Generating Plant
1700 Dtmnaway Road
Semora, N.C. 27343
1\
r� L
C
January 29, 1998
Subject: Toxicity Testing Protocol
CP&L-Roxboro Plant
NC0003425
Person County
Ms. Jungclas:
My staff has received and reviewed CP&L Roxboro's acute toxicity test which was conducted on 1212/97.
During review of the toxicity test, our office noted the temperature for the sample used in this test was recorded as
18.0 degrees Celsius. Protocol states that "a toxicity sample must be collected and stored with an amount of ice
sufficient to maintain its temperature between 0 and 4 degrees Celsius until receipt in the laboratory." The only
allowable exception to this is in the case of a grab sample, provided the sample is used in the laboratory within
four hours of collection. Our office contacted CP&L Environmental Services to verify that a composite sample
was collected for this test. Mr. Cameron Wheeler indicated to us that a composite sample was collected and
chilled but warmed to 18.0 degrees Celsius. Therefore, our office has recorded the test as invalid.
If a "pass" was submitted on CP&L Roxboro's monthly monitoring report (DMR) for December, 1997,
we remind you that the DMR submitted to the Division's Central Files must be amended. The effluent DMR
facility information must be completely filled out (at the top of the sheet), and the form should have
"CORRECTED COPY" written or typed at the top. The parameter code of your particular toxicity test should be
reentered in an appropriate column with a brief explanation that the test performed by CP&L Environmental
Services was not suitable as performed.
Please be aware of language present in your permit requirement that states, "Failure to achieve test
conditions as speed in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival and appropriate
environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate retesting (within 30 days of
initial monitoring event). Our office realizes a toxicity test cannot be conducted during the month of January;
therefore, our office will expect a test to be conducted during the month of February and again in March to meet
the quarterly requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, you are encouraged to call me or Kristie Robeson at (919)
733-2136.
Sincerely,
Man Matthews, Supervisor
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
cc: Judy Garnett-RRO
Reid Garrett-CP&L Environmental Services
Central Files
Environmental Sciences Branch a 4401 Reedy Creek Road
Telephone [phone]
An Equal Oppodu* Affuroa * AeMon Employer
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
FAX [phone]
50%mcyeledr10% poet cmnuner POWr

CP&L
Carolina Power & light Company
Roxboro Electric Generating Plant
1700 Dunnaway Rd.
Samara, NC 27343
File: 10020 E
Mr. Ken Schuster
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Dear Mr. Schuster:
Carolyn M. Jungclas
Interim Plant Manager
July 28, 1997
I am writing to inform you of our new mailing address. Please forward all correspondence
in the future to our new address.
Old Address: Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Plant %� o y✓
P. O. Box 1238 l
Roxboro, North Carolina 27573
New Address: Carolina Power & Light Company
1700 Dunnaway Rd.
Semora, North Carolina 27343
Would you please forward this letter to the appropriate person.
S' cerely,
Carolyn . Jungcl
Interim Plant Manager
CMJ/pcw
s:\admin\environmental form.doc
Hwy 57 North Tel [phone] Fax [phone]

State of North Carol
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
It
[DEHNFR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
June 11, 1997
Mr. John Carney, Plant Manager
CP&L, Roxboro Steam Electric Generating Plant
P.O. Box 1238
Roxboro, North Carolina 27573
Subject: Bio-monitoring Inspection
CP&L - Roxboro (pipe 003)
NPDES Permit Number NC0003425
Person County
Dear Mr. Carney:
Ms. Vanessa Manuel of the Raleigh Regional Office collected a
24-hour composite sample of the effluent at the subject facility on
June 3, 1997. The Division's Aquatic Toxicological Unit performed
an acute Pimephales promelas definitive toxicity test on these
samples. The June 3 sample passed the fathead minnow test. Test
results and measured water quality parameters for this sample
indicate that the effluent would not be predicted to have acute
water quality impacts on the receiving water. The facility
maintained compliancy with the permit requirement.
If you have questions concerning this notification, please
feel free to contact Ms. Vanessa Manuel at 919/571-4700.
Sincerely,
�n.
J dy Garrett
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
ATTACHMENT
cc: Person County Health Department
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N r C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

rates Lriv,ronmental Protection Agency
Washington. D. C. 20660
Form Approved
OMB No. 2040-0003
�bEPA NPDES Compliance Inspection Report
Approval Expires7.31.85
Section A: National Data System Coding
Tran ction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type In
I lol�dol31+7 ,e�( Isi-S
tot Fac Type
2d?I
� J �lNl�lolold3lql2lsl„
,2I�
Remarks
T
Reserved Facility Evaluation Rating
6J 69 7
��
66
BI ------------------ Reserved-----------------
71u 7a 73W 74 74_L 80
Section B: Facility Data
ame a bon o acility, Inspected
CP �' � - R•olxboro sk4,., F/Pe4e, c 6e.u, a-,4 �� /a •�
Entry Time ❑ AM ® PM
; ���
Permit Effective Date
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
NWV 5� tj
PQvSon C�.,n1°
/r'30 !v 3�!
3C 1 i
Name(s) s o n- ire epresentative(s)
Title(s)
Phone No(s)
Zt 0,101e 'ikI-�e-
ame, Address of Res onsible Official
shn ��
Titl
Ala rtRl� ��
Phone No.
Contacted
P-o' 13'ir 1 Z� fJ
FA"Xb orn n(C Z-*,9 :7 3
q1ol J .c- 9i— / qq
❑ Yes ZNo
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection
(S = Satisfactory, M = Marginal, U = Unsatisfactory, N = Not Evaluated)
Records/Reports
Facility Site Review
Flow Measurement
Laboratory
Effluent/Receiving Waters
H
Pretreatment I
Compliance Schedules
Self -Monitoring Program
Operations & Maintenance
Sludge Disposal
Other.
itPermit
Section D: Summary of Findings/Comments (Attach additional sheets it necessary)
Name(s) and Sipnature(s) of Inspector(s)
Agency/Office/Telephone
Date
Q�•a S• i
/Q,c°p
Signature of Reviewer
Agency/Office
Date
d v-/ G (o
Regulatory Office Use Only
Action Taken
Date
Compliance Status
❑
Noncompliance
Compliance
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev. 3-85) Previous editions are obsolete.

Division of Water Quality
June 6, 1997
MEMORANDUM FI(
To: Judy Garrett
Through: Matt Matthews (I JUN — 9 FO
UEHNR
From: Sandy Mort REG ONAL OFFGCE
Subject: Whole effluent toxicity test results
CP&L-Roxboro/003
NPDES permit # NC0003425003
Person County
The aquatic toxicity test using a composite sample of effluent discharged from CP&L-Roxboro/003 has
been completed. CP&L-Roxboro/003 has an effluent discharge entering Hyco Lake. A whole effluent
sample was collected June 3 by V. Manuel for use in an acute Pimephales promelas pass/fail toxicity
test. The June 3 sample passed the fathead minnow test. Toxicity information follows.
Test Type 24-hour Pimephales promelas pass/fail
Test Concentrations 90% sample
Test Result
Control Survival
Test Treatment Survival
Sample pH
Sample Conductivity
Sample Total Residual Chlorine
Pass
100%
97.8%
7.49 SU
89.2 micromhos/cm
<0.1 mg/1
Test results and measured water quality parameters for this sample indicate that the effluent would not
be predicted to have acute water quality impacts on receiving water. Please contact us if further
effluent toxicity monitoring is desired. We may be reached at [phone].
Basin: ROA05
cc: Central Files
Environmental Sciences Branch Water Quality Section

Date sent: Mon, 9 Jun 1997 15:45:32 -0500
To: manuel [e-mail]
From: sandy [e-mail] (Sandy Mort)
Subject: tox test results
Copies to: [e-mail]
Results:
CP&L-Roxboro/003, 24 hr fathead acute p/f: PASS

NC Division of Environmental R igement
Aquatic ToxicoloL_ _ nit [phone]
Toxicity Sample Collection Form
Facility or StreamC'i�L- r.c. q E/P�ff�.c loaf
NPDES # NC U' -5 1 z1 I Z 1 Pipe
County ersort
Basin/Sub-basin 5
Receiving Stream C, L CdK E
Sa
Re ion
Collectorl d4nmfl,, L1AyjF5Kd JARO FRO MRO RR WARO WIRO 1VSRO
Grab= Composite® ©Samples per Hour for 2�Hours
Time
Time
Date BeEnn Begun Date End End
Yes No Yes No Yes No
Chlorinated Collected Iced Shipped Icedm
Method of Shipment: Courier Bus &
Other
Comments
7A
Signature
�11 I SF ONLY Reed By:� Date:
t
Rec'd From: Mun e Time:
,eel Temp. (°C):
Yh i .
TRC by: = Rel. mV 0 = = mg/1
'&I'N&P Sample Collected By:� �P�'F � v�'�G 6h�
Revised 1/10/1991
4-�� l� %r ox, G �l esh�5 iAa-,le�

State of North Carwn, .a
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources&ja
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary ID E H N FR
eµt�.�'
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
March 24, 1997
John Carney, Manager, Environmental Services
Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Generating Plant
Post Office Box 1238
Roxboro, North Carolina 27573
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Roxboro Electric Plant WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0003425
Person County
Dear Mr. Carney:
On March 3,1997, Mr. Steve Mitchell, of the Raleigh Regional
Office, conducted a compliance evaluation inspection of the subject
facility. The assistance of Mr. Ronald Wolfe and Ms. Joanie Cooke
is appreciated. The following recommendations and/or comments are
the result of Mr. Mitchell's inspection:
1. The grounds and the facility appeared well maintained and
operated.
2. There are five permitted discharge pipes under the current
permit. Pipe 002 is the ash settling pond, 003 is the heated
water discharge canal, 005 is cooling tower water blowdown,
006 is the coal pile run-off discharge, and 008 is the
wastewater treatment plant. Pipe 009 was the discharge from
chemical metal cleaning but has been deleted from the permit.
3. The discharge from the ash pond (002) appeared clear and
free of excess solids.
4. The solids generated by the package plant are disposed of
in the ash pond.
5. A review of the self monitoring data for a one year period
from January 1996 to December 1996, indicated compliance with
the permit. The facility is monitoring for all parameters
and locations as specified in the permit. Bench sheets, log
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Ii
Voice 919-571-4700 ® 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Page Two
CP&L Roxboro
books, DMR's, etc. indicate that this data is being properly
recorded and transmitted to DEM.
6. Field parameter analyses are completed on site and the
remaining chemical analyses is accomplished at the Energy and
Environmental Center at Shearon Harris and through outside
laboratories.
7. The ORC's log book was accurate and up to date.
If you have any questions regarding this inspection, or if you need
additional information, please call Mr. Mitchell or Mr. Ted Cashion
at 919-571-4700.
Sincerely,
E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Person County Health Department
Joanie Cooke, CP&L

• States Environmental Protection Agency
ad
• Washington, D. C. 20460
Form Approved
OMB No. 20400003
a*EPA NPDES Compliance Inspection Report
P P
Approval Expires 7-31-85
Section A: National Data System Coding
Transaction �Co�de� .1 1 NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1u 9J j/JIc- 0j0jgI3HIf�-ISI11 1 S 3 17 16u 19's zd1J
Remarks
66
Reserved Facility Evaluation Rating 81 0.4 ------------------ Reserved --------------- --
67u� 69 7 71 1� 7 j 73W 74 7q�� BO
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected
CP *-L �Royc r3olZo
Entry Time Q AM ❑ PM
Permit Effective Date
S
1 / e.
Exit Time/Date
Perm' Ezpir lion Date i
S�
�/,3
ame(sl of On -Site Representatives)
Title(s)
Phone No(s)
QaA.a; E C
(•� _ _ �41 r
"�'
3 6
U,
`Title
Name, Address of Res ons ble O iclall
3S3 +v eu�%t•tC�Kolic rv, A-) 1�
O
Phone No.-yContacted
t
LY1 yes ❑ No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection
(S = Satisfactory, M = Marginal, U = Unsatisfactory, N = Not Evaluated)
Permit
Flow Measurement
Pretreatment
S
Operations & Maintenance
C Records/Reports
III
Laboratory
Compliance Schedules
Sludge Disposal
Af
Ale
Facility Site Review
<
Effluent/Recai *py-Waters
1,S
I Self -Monitoring Program
Other
Section D: Summary of Findings/Comments (Attach additional sheets if necessary)
p�
i
Nam sl a Signet r 1 1 of Ins ector(s)
Agency/Offic/e/Teleph a
Date
air3
e
Signature of Reviewer
Agency/Office
Date
VwVoo
9?o314
Regulatory Office Use Only
Action Taken
Date
Compliance Status
❑
Non hephanWoce
om nce
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev. 3-85) Previous editions are obsolete.

To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: Jeff Myrha
Date March 6, 1997
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County Person
Permit No. NC0003425
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address:CP 6 L Roxboro
2. Date of Investigation:March 31 1997
3. Report Prepared by: S. Mitchell
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number:Joanie Cooke
362-3553
5. Directions to Site:501 n to aaglst. on s��n
�<< 4D � 53 hl l k-)y 54-
��� 5�)� 6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
ado
, r Latitude: 3_6_Z' 006 Longitude:79 04'41_
� Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment
r facility site and discharge point on map.
i n
• �l/'y � U.S.G.S. Quad No. B22NE U.S.G.S. Quad Name Leesburg
7. Site size and expansion area consistent with
• application ? Yes
Yes No If No, explain:
R. Topography (relationship to flood plain included):
rolling hills
9. Location of nearest dwelling:1/2 mile
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
HYCO LAKE
a. Classification:C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.:Roanoke
C. Describe receiving stream features and
pertinent downstream uses:Lake Hyco

PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of Wastewater to be permitted: D.D.15-
MGD(Ultimate Design Capacity)
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Waste
Water Treatment facility?0.015 MGD
C. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility
(current design capacity)?0.015 MGD
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorization to Construct issued in the previous two years:
e. Please provide a description of existing or
substantially constructed wastewater treatment facilities:
002 discharge from Ash Pond
003 discharge from heated water canal
005 discharge from cooling towers
006 discharge from coal pile
008 discharge from package plant
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater
treatment facilities:
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:Se, As, Cd, C1
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
in development approved
should be required___ not needed
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme:
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM
permit no.
Residual Contractor
Telephone No.
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP
PFRP Other
C. Landfill:
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify):On site in
ash pond
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating
sheet):
4. SIC Code(s):4911
Wastewater Code(s) of actual wastewater, not particular
facilities i.e.., non -contact cooling water discharge from a
metal plating company would be 14, not 56.

I
Primary 14 secondary 1fi, 17, 60, _68, 70, 73,
Main Treatment Unit Code: 03 $ 0 7
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant
Funds or are any public monies involved. (municipals only)?No
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity)
requests:None
3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: (Please
indicate)
Date
Submission of Plans and Specifications
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated
all of the non -discharge options available. Please provide
regional perspective for each option evaluated.
Spray Irrigation:NA
Connection to Regional Sewer System:NA
SubsurfaceNA
Other disposal options:
5. Other Special Items:
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This facility has a history of compliance with the permit
limitations and monitoring requirements of the NPDES Permit and
the Raleigh Regional Office recommends the renewal of the
discharge permit for a period of time consistent with the river
basin policy.
.a.y..., �...�,...
Wate Qu lity Regional Supervisor
%5. 60
Da e

jN I
i, V

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT,
HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
3800 Barren Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
[phone]
FILE ACCESS RECORD
SECTION UZA
Z
TIMEIDATE
NAME
REPRESENTING D 5 C'
GUIDELINES FOR ACCESS: The staff of the Raleigh Regional Office is dedicated to making
public records in our custody readily available to the public for review and copying. We also have the
responsibility to the public to safeguard these records and to carry out our day-to-day program
obligations. Please read carefully the following guidelines before signing this form.
(1) We prefer that you call at least a day in advance to schedule an appointment to review the
files. Appointments will be scheduled between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Viewing time ends
at 5:00 p.m. Anyone arriving without an appointment may view the files to the extent that
time and staff supervision is available.
(2) You must specify files you want to review by facilny name. The number of files that you may
review at one time will be limited to five.
(3) You may make copies of a file when the copier is not in use by the staff and if time permits.
Cost per copy is 10 cents: payment may be made by check, money order or cash at the
reception desk.
(4) FILES MUST BE KEPT IN THE ORDER YOU FOUND THEM. Files may not be taken from the
or destroy material in one of these files is a
office. To remove, alter, deface, mutilate,
misdemeanor for which you can be fined up to $500.00.
........................................................................................................................
FACILITY NAME COUNTY
C P� L
2.
3.
4.
5.
Signature 6 e of Firm(Business Date Time In Time Out
(Please attach a business card)

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
_�5fi
PERMIT NO.: NC0003425
PERMITTEE NAME: Carolina Power and Light Company
FACILITY NAME: Roxboro Steam Electric Generating Plant
Facility Status: _ Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 002
Design Capacity: No flow limit
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
0.2 %
Comments: REGio
* Flow not limited. See attached description of outfall 002
RECEIVING STREAM: Hyco Lake
Class: B
Sub -Basin: 03-02-05
Reference USGS Quad: B 22 NE (please attach)
County., Person
Regional Office:.. Raleigh Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 4/30/97 Treatment Plant Class: Class II
Classification changes within three miles:
none
111YM
Requested by: Jeff Myhra Date: 4"q
Prepared by. " -- --�
Date: t3 r,t�.
Reviewed by Date: 01 (t4 bn
�Du ;aLA-
Modeler
Date Rea
#
Drainage Area (nii2): n/a 7Q10 (cfs):
LAKE
Daily
Monthly
Daily
Average
Average Maximum
Wasteflow (mgd):
Total Selenium (lbs/d): 5.9*
Total Suspended Solids (mg/1):
30
100
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
15
20
FeW Coliform (# /100mQ:
200
400
pfI (SU):
6-9
+ Daily grab samples shall be combined into a weekly composite prior to
analysis.
Sampling shall be conducted every other week.
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirments listed above shall
be taken at the ash pond discharge prior to mixing with other sources of
wastewater.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace
amounts outside an area five (5) meters from the discharge pipe.
The metal cleaning waste and low volume waste shall be discharged to the wsh
settling pond.
Biological monitoring will be conducted as required by Part III, M of this
permit. Additional limitations on the concentration of any or all of the heavy
metals or trace elements contained in this discharge may be imposed, after
opportunity for hearing by the Director of DWQ, provided that said limitations
are required to insure that Hyco Lake is suitable for its assigned usage as Class
"B" waters. Upon such determination, the permittee shall submit for the
approval of the Director, within 90 days of determination, an implementation
schedule for the adequate control of the heavy metals or toxic trace elements.

FOR APPROPRIATE DISCHARGES, LIST COMPLETE GUIDELINE LIMITATIONS BELOW
Effluent Characteristics
Outfall 0021
Monthly
Avera} e
Daily Maximum
Comments
�l1
TSS
Oil and Grease
Shall be in the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
30.0 m 100.0 m
15.0 m 20.0 m
40 CFK 423.12 (b)(1) BPI'
40 CFR.12 (b)(3) BPT
40 CFR.12 (b)(3) BPT
Effluent from the ash pond discharges into the discharge canal and is ultimately released into Hyco Reservoir through outfall 003.
The ash pond in turn receives and treats combined flows from the ash transport system, the low volume waste system, coal pile
runoff, domestic sewage treatment plant effluent (outfall 008), silo wash water, the dry flyash handling system, cooling tower
blowdown (outfall 005), stormwater runoff, and drainage from the ash landfill.
Type of Product Produced
M e Produced
LtIftient Guidelines Reference
Electricity (the facility is a four unit electric
generating plant using coal-fired boilers to
2462
40 CFR Part J'_ ; Stcd,n l[lecu is Po,.� er
Produce steam for turbine generators with a
Generating Point Source Category
combined net capacity of 2462 MWe.

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
IIu' II - +�
ll L FELT I e
-3 697 •��
ir,,. -
Request # 834CC
CP & L - Roxboro Steam & Electric Generating Plant
NC0003425 - 002
Industrial - 99.8 %
Domestic - 0.2 %
Existing
Renewal
Strewn Characteristic:
Hyco Lake
USGS #
B
Date:
03-02-05
Drainage Area (mi2):
Person
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Raleigh
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Myhra
Average Flow (cfs):
1 / 14 / 97
30Q2 (cfs):
B 22 NE
IWC (%,):
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFIC
Ash Pond: ash transport water, low volume wastes, runoff from ash landfill, dry flyash
handling system wash water, coal pile runoff, silo wash water, stormwater runoff,
blowdown from Unit #4 cooling tower, and sewage treatment plant effluent.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Recommended bti I/ ` L Date: _, a
Farrell Ka�lx�ghAlgf�-�
t
Instream Assessment���""Date: 1 j %
Regional Supervisor'- NP � (.`- j Date:2 z- 16�7
l
Permits & Engineering: Date: Z b q
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SUPPORT BY:
CW^�va 6� kr�Ooe GRit. 96�2
Lake

1711MMY51:9Ytt al
existing Limits•
Daily Monthly Daily Measurement
Sample
Average Average Maximum Frequency
Type
Wasteflow (mgd): Daily
Continuous
Total Selenium (lbs/d): 5.9* Biweekly *
Composite
Total Suspended Solids (mg/1): 30 100 2 / month
Composite
Oil & Grease (mg/1): 15 20 2 / month
Grab
Feacl Coliform (# /100mQ: 200 400 Monthly
Grab
pH (SU): 6-9 Weekly
Grab
* Daily grab samples shall be combined into a weekly composite prior to analysis.
Sampling shall be conducted every other week.
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirments listed above shall be taken at the ash pond discharge
prior to mixing with other sources of wastewater.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts outside an area five (5)
meters from the discharge pipe.
The metal cleaning waste and low volume waste shall be discharged to the ash settling pond.
Biological monitoring will be conducted as required by Part III, M of this permit. Additional limitations on the
concentration of any or all of the heavy metals or trace elements contained in this discharge may be imposed, after
opportunity for hearing by the Director of DEM, provided that said limitations are required to insure that Hyco Lake
is suitable for its assigned usage as Class "B" waters. Upont such determination, the permittee shall submit for the
approval of the Director, within 90 days of determination, an implementation schedu�4 for the adequate control of the
heavy metals or toxic trace elements.
Recommended Limits:
Daily Monthly Daily Measurement
Sample
Average Average Maximum Frequency
Type
Wasteflow (mgd): Daily
Continuous
Total Selenium (lbs/d): 5.9* Biweekly *
Composite
Total Suspended Solids (mg/1): 30 100 2 / month
Composite
Oil & Grease (mg/1): 15 20 2 / month
Grab
Feacl Coliform (# /100mQ: 200 400 Monthly
Grab
pH (SU): 6-9 Weekly
Grab
* Daily grab samples shall be combined into a weekly composite prior to analysis.
Sampling shall be conducted every other week.
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirments listed above shall be taken at the ash pond discharge
prior to mixing with other sources of wastewater.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts outside an area five (5)
meters from the discharge pipe.
The metal cleaning waste and low volume waste shall be discharged to the ash settling pond
Biological monitoring will be conducted as required by Part III, M of this permit. Additional limitations on the
concentration of any or all of the heavy metala or trace elements contained in this discharge may be imposed, after
opportunity for hearing by the Director of D, provided that said limitations are required to insure that Hyco Lake
is suitable for its assigned usage as Class "B" waters. Upotiq such determination, the permittee shall submit for the
approval of the Director, within 90 days of determination, an implementation schedttl for the adequate control of the
heavy metals or toxic trace elements.

Upstream Location:
Downstream Location:
Parameters:
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
not required
not required
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Ad"uacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demons the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes _ No N
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional office
recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached?
(Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0003425
PERMITTEE NAME: Carolina Power and Light Company
FACILPI'Y NAME: Roxboro Steam Electric Generating Plant
Facility Status: _Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major -4 Minor
Pipe No.: 003
Design Capacity: No flow limit
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
RECEIVING STREAM:Hyco Lake
Class: B
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
L.Z
t tq
11,7
Drainage Area (mi2): n/a
zLi5
Y w (mgd):
rare (° C):
FEB
T idual Chlorine (jig/1):
9
T osphorus (mg/1):
T itrogen (mg/1):
DEHNR RgLEIG
REG� IpNgt OFFtr
Beni (µg/1):
pll (S ):
Sub -Basin: 03-02-05
Reference USGS Quad: B 22 NE (please attach)
County: Person
Regional Office: Raleigh Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 4/30/97 Treatment Plant Class: Class II
Classification changes within three miles:
none
Requested by:
Reviewed bytL
l3o'D
")'0 G
/ //Y/Y7
Date: `l9
Date: r3 Fa". rr
7Q10 (cfs): LAKE
Daily Monthly Instantaneous
Average Average Maximum
Continuous Monitoring *
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor **
200 ***
6-9
I I IERE SHALL BE NO CHROMIUM, ZINC, OR COPPER ADDED TO THE
TREATMENT SYSTEM EXCEPT AS PRE -APPROVED ADDITIVES TO
BIOCIDAL COMPOUNDS.
* Plant Intake. Effluent sampling point shall be located on the discharge
canal at the point of discharge into Ilyco Lake. Samples taken in
compliance with the monitoring requirments listed above shall be taken
prior to mixing with other sources of wastewater.
** The permittee shall operate so as to remain in compliance with the
conditions outlined in the mixing zone defined under Part III, L of this
permit. The temperature on Hyco Lake shall at no time exceed the
thermal water quality standard outside the mixing zone defined in Part III,
L. Monitoring in the mixing zone shall be between 4C and 4D as shown
on the Fishery and Temperature Survey Map by continuous monitor.
These thermal limitations may be deleted or revised as appropriate, based
upon evaluation of the the results of the thermal studies.
*** Total Residual Chlorine may not be discharged from any single generating
unit for more than two hours per day, unless the permittee can
demonstrate to the Division of Water Quality that a discharge for more
than two hours is required for macroinvertebrate control. Simultaneous
multi -unit chlorination is permitted. In order to meet the two hour
limitation, the chlorination shall be automatically controlled or a tog kept
of manual system operation times.
The permittee is allowed to operate Unit 3 in a once -through cooling mode from
October 15 through April 30.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace
amounts outside an area five (5) meters from the discharge pipe.

FOR APPROPRIATE DISCHARGES, LIST COMPLETE GUIDELINE LIMITATIONS BELOW
At the point that the discharge canal enters Hyco Reservoir, it contains flow from several waste streams, including once through
cooling water, stormwater runoff, and the effluent from the ash pond (Outfall 002). The ash pond in turn receives and treats
combined flows from the ash transport system, the low volume waste system, coal pile runoff, domestic sewage treatment plant
effluent, silo wash water, the dry flyash handling system, cooling tower blowdown, stormwater runoff, and drainage from the
ash landfill.
a I believe this limit is applicable to facility operations at outfall 003. This limit was not referenced on the last permit renewal.
Type of Product Produced Nlkve Produced
Electricity (the facility is a four unit electric 2 4 6
generating plant using coal-fired boilers to
produce steam for turbine generators with a
combined net capacity of 2462 MWe.
•�������c::k.ruluenneS Keterenee
U CFk 1',ut 12; - Steam Electric
Generating Point Source Category
L

FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
Request# 8541
CP & L - Roxboro Steam & Electric Generating Plant
NC0003425 - 003
Industrial - 100 %
Existing
Renewal
Stream Characteristic:
Hyco Lake
USGS #
B
Date:
03-02-05
Drainage Area (mi2):
Person
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Raleigh
Winter 7QI0 (cfs):
Myhra
Average Flow (cfs):
1 / 14 / 97
30Q2 (cfs):
B 22 NE
IWC (%):
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Discharge to Hyco Reservoir: contains waste streams including once -through cooling
water, stormwater runoff, and effluent from ash pond, (outfall 002).
Note deletion of arsenic monitoring and addition of pH limit
Schedule Requirements and additional comments from
Recommended
Instream A
py Regional ;
Permits &
Lake
v
Vk, w, n 6W 46ce+.. &a 4
✓/ft,t "vyGf S
.9i% ✓l
,Date: zy 199T
Date:/'�
_ Date;',- 7- -7
Date: L y
SUPPORT BY:
h oJ¢ VWM C. k (- FL ,-r
DEHNR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE

Existing Limits:
Wasteflow (mgd):
Temperature (° C):
Total Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Total Phosphorus (mg/1):
Total Nitrogen (mg/1):
Arsenic (µg/1):
pH (SU):
PARAMETERS
Daily Monthly Instantaneous Measurement
Average Average Maximum Frequency
Continuous *
monitor ** Continuous
200*** 2/month
monitor Monthly
monitor Monthly
monitor Monthly
not required
Sample
Type
Pump Log or
Similar
Recording
Multiple Grabs
Grab
Grab
Grab
THERE SHALL BE NO CHROMIUM, ZINC, OR COPPER ADDED TO THE
TREATMENT SYSTEM EXCEPT AS PRE -APPROVED ADDITIVES TO BIOCIDAL
COMPOUNDS.
* Plant Intake. Effluent sampling point shall be located on the discharge canal at the point
of discharge into Hyco Lake. Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring
requirments listed above shall be taken prior to mixing with other sources of wastewater.
** The permittee shall operate so as to remain in compliance with the conditions outlined in
the mixing zone defined under Part III, L of this permit. The temperature on Hyco Lake
shall at no time exceed the thermal water quality standard outside the mixing zone defined
in Part III, L. Monitoring in the mixing zone shall be between 4C and 4D as shown on
the Fishery and Temperature Survey Map by continuous monitor. These thermal
limitations may be deleted or revised as appropriate, based upon evaluation of the the
results of the thermal studies.
*** Total Residual Chlorine may not be discharged from any single generating unit for more
thani two hours per day, unless the permittee can demonstrate to the Division of
Environmental Management that a discharge for more than two hours is required for
macroinvertebrate control. Simultaneous multi -unit chlorination is permitted. In order to
meet the two hour limitation, the chlorination shall be automatically controlled or a log
kept of manual system operation times.
The permittee is allowed to operate Unit 3 in a once -through cooling mode from October 15
through April 30.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts
outside an area five (5) meters from the discharge pipe.

Recommended Limits•
Wasteflow (mgd):
Temperature (° C):
Total Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Total Phosphorus (mg/1):
Total Nitrogen (mg/1):
ArseSUj µme):
191.1 i3ioll��lt7.�
Daily Monthly Instantaneous Measurement
Average Average Maximum Frequency
monitor **
200 ***
monitor
monitor
not required*
6-9
Continuous *
Continuous
2 / month
Monthly
Monthly
Monthly
Weekly
Sample
Type
Pump Log or
Similar
Recording
Multiple Grabs
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
THERE SHALL BE NO CHROMIUM, ZINC, OR COPPER ADDED TO THE
TREATMENT SYSTEM EXCEPT AS PRE -APPROVED ADDITIVES TO BIOCIDAL
COMPOUNDS.
* Plant Intake. Effluent sampling point shall be located on the discharge canal at the point
of discharge into Hyco Lake. Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring
requirments listed above shall be taken prior to mixing with other sources of wastewater.
** The permittee shall operate so as to remain in compliance with the conditions outlined in
the mixing zone defined under Part III, L of this permit. The temperature on Hyco Lake
shall at no time exceed the thermal water quality standard outside the mixing zone defined
in Part III, L. Monitoring in the mixing zone shall be between 4C and 41) as shown on
the Fishery and Temperature Survey Map by continuous monitor. These thermal
limitations may be deleted or revised as appropriate, based upon evaluation of the 'the
results of the thermal studies.
*** Total Residual Chlorine may not be discharged from any single generating unit for more
than two hours per day, unless the permittee can demonstrate to the Division of Water
Quality that a discharge for more than two hours is required for macroinvertebrate
control. Simultaneous multi -unit chlorination is permitted. In order to meet the two hour
limitation, the chlorination shall be automatically controlled or a log kept of manual
system operation times.
The permittee is allowed to operate Unit 3 in a once -through cooling mode from October 15
through April 30.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts
outside an area five (5) meters from the discharge pipe.
�'�rS tlC <heu�� �p �n�P % CasICQr caf;4r�5 003, —i
n c c (a t c�oBa G(A2¢ v -h � �tr ka, i 2cc ri G J4 t�t1
MOU
��� pCcas� Corn.✓�� � �nu.�rt.�wt�u� ��,/1��

INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: not required
Downstream Location: not required
Parameters:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demons" the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes _ No ✓
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional office
recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

Facility Name: CP , . - Roxboro Plant Permit # D003425 Pipe # 003
ACUTE TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a quarterly basis using protocols defined in the North
Carolina Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology For Determining Acute Toxicity In A
Single Effluent Concentration' (Revised -July, 1992 or subsequent versions). The monitoring shall be
performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24 hour static test The effluent concentration at
which there may be at no time significant acute mortality is 90% (defined as treatment two in the
procedure document). Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained during
representative effluent discharge below all waste treatment. The tests will be performed during the months
of Mar., Jun., Sep., and Dec.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code
TGE6C. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-2 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of
the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the
waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test
form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report
with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the
Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring
will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test
requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly
test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened
and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require
immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of a month following the month of
the initial monitoring.
s7Q10 Lake cfs
Permitted Flow n/a mgd Recommended
1WC n/a %
Basin & Subbasin 03-02-05
Receiving Stream Hyco Lake
County Person
Date z't
r
Farrell Keough
QAL (Fathead 24) PIF Version 9196

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0003425
PERMITTEE NAME: Carolina Power and Light Company
FACU ITY NAME: Roxboro Steam Electric Generating Plant
Facility Status: _Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major -4 Minor
Pipe No.: 005
Design Capacity: No now limit
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
Drainage Area (mi2): n/a 7Q10 (cfs): LAKE
Monthly Daily
ra r Average Maximum
U 15 rc aste'low (in
L ree Available Chlorine (µg/1); 200 * 500
otaI Residual Chlorine (µg/l):
FEB 9 WT hromium (µg/1): 200 ** 200 **
me (µg/l): 1,000 ** 1,000 **
H (SU): 6-9
DE ION j nr,' H he 126 priority pollutants (40 CFR 423, Appendix A) exclusive of Zinc and Chromium
Comments:
Flow not limited See attached description of outfall 005
RECEIVING STREAM: Hyco take
Class: B
Sub -Basin: 03-02-05
Reference USGS Quad: B 22 NE (please attach)
County: Person
Regional Office:__ Raleigh Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 4/30/97 Treatment Plant Class: Class II
Classification changes within three miles:
none
Requested by:
Prepared
Reviewed by:_L._�
t,ka1,�
///Y/47
Date:
Date: 15 tea
Date:
THERE SHALL BE NO CHROMIUM, ZINC, OR COPPER ADDED TO THE
TREATMENT SYSTEM EXCEPT AS PRE -APPROVED ADDITIVES TO
BIOCIDAL COMPOUNDS.
Neither free available chlorine nor total residual chlorine may be
discharged from any single generating unit for more than two hours per
day, unless the permittee demonstrates to the Division of Water Quality
that discharge for more ban two hours is required for macroinveriebrate
control. The 500 µg/l limitation is an instantaneous maximum and is to
be measured during the chlorine release period. The 200 µg/1 limitation is
an average during the chlorine release period.
** These limitations and monitoring requinnents apply only if these
substances are added by the permittee for cooling tower maintenance.
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirments specified above
shall be taken at the following locations: Discharge from the cooling tower
prior to mixing with other waste streams. Permittee may take samples for
chlorine in the cooling tower basin.
Discharge of blowdown from the cooling tower shall be limited to the minimum
discharge of recirculation water necessary for the purpose of discharging materials
contained in the process, the further build-up of which would cause concentration
in amounts exceeding limitations established by best engineering practice.
The permittee shall notify the Division of Water Quality, Raleigh Regional
Office prior to draining the cooling tower, except during non -office hour
emergencies when notification must be made the next working day.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace
amounts outside an area five (5) meters from the discharge pipe.

FOR APPROPRIATE DISCHARGES, LIST COMPLETE GUIDELINE LIMITATIONS BELOW
Effluent Characteristics
\lonthly Daily �Alaxil ntttt
Comments
Outfall 0051
A verage
H
Free Available Chlorine
Shall be in the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
0.20
40 CFR 423.12 (b)(1) BPT
126 Priori Pollutants
m i E 0.50 in
No Detectable Amount
40 CFR 423.13 (d)(1) BAT
40 CFR 423.13 (d)(1) BAT
Chromium, Total
Zinc, Total
0.2 mg/1- 0.20 m
40 FR 423.13 (d)(1) BAT
1.0 m 1.0 m
40 CFR 423.13 (d)(1) BAT
40 CFR 423.13 (d)(2) BAT
40 CFR 423.13 (d)(3) BAT
Outfall 005 consists of cooling tower blowdown from unit number 4. The cooling tower blowdown discharges into the ash
transport system and ultimately flows into the ash pond. Effluent from the ash pond discharges into the discharge canal and is
ultimately released into Hyco Reservoir through outfall 003.
Type of Product Produced
Niwe Produced
Effluent Guidelines Reference
Elccu icily (the facility is a four unit electric
l�,�
40 CFR Para 423 -Steam Electric Power
generating plant using coal -fined boilers to
produce steam for turbine generators with a
Generating Point Source Category
combined net capacity of 2462 MWe.

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request # 8542
CP & L - Roxboro Steam & Electric Generating Plant
NC0003425 - 005
Industrial - 100 %
Existing
Renewal
Stream Characteristic:
Hyco Lake
USGS #
B
Date:
03-02-05
Drainage Area (mi2):
Person
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Raleigh
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Myhra
Average Flow (cfs):
1 / 14 / 97
30Q2 (cfs):
B 22 NE
IWC (%):
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Cooling Tower Blowdown from Unit 4 and then to Ash Pond (Outfall 002).
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Recommended by:
Instream A
?� Regional
J Permits &
FEB - 3 M
9g }
Date: Z /Z
BY:
krb s-"- Wry. Pt RI._�- MAf-WG ENL SGWiI�L��p;
Lake
OEHNR RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE

PARAMETERS
Existing Limits:
Monthly
Daily
Measurement
Sample
Average
Maximum
Frequency
Type
Pump Log or
Wasteflow (mgd):
Continuous
Similar
Free Available Chlorine (µg/l);
200 *
500 *
2 / month
Multiple Grabs
Total Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
*
*
2 / month
Multiple Grabs
Chromium (µg/1):
200 **
200 **
2 / month
Composite
Zinc (µg/l):
1,000 **
1,000 **
2 / month
Composite
pH (SU):
6-9
Weekly
Grab
The 126 priority pollutants (40 CFR 423, Appendix A)
exclusive of Zinc and Chromium
THERE SHALL BE NO CHROMIUM, ZINC, OR COPPER ADDED TO THE
TREATMENT SYSTEM EXCEPT AS PRE -APPROVED ADDITIVES TO BIOCIDAL
COMPOUNDS.
Neither free available chlorine nor total residual chlorine may be discharged from any
single generating unit,�or more than tVvo hours per day, unless the permittee demonstrates
to the Division of Ettvrioflmental-Whai gement that discharge for more ban two hours is
required for macroinvertebrate control. The 500 µg/l limitation is an instantaneous
maximum and is to be measured during the chlorine release period. The 200 µg/1
limitation is an average during the chlorine release period.
** These limitations and monitoring requirments apply only if these substances are added by
the permittee for cooling tower maintenance.
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirments specified above shall be taken at
the following locations: Discharge from the cooling tower prior to mixing with other waste
streams. Permittee may take smaples for chlorine in the cooling tower basin.
Discharge of blowdown from the cooling tower shall be limited to the minimum discharge of
recirculation water necessary for the purpose of discharging materials contained in the process,
the further build-up of which would cause concentration in amounts exceeding limitations
established by best engineering practice.
The permittee shall notify the Division of Environmental xManagement, Raleigh Regional Office
prior to draining the cooling tower, except during non -office hour emergencies when
notification must be made the next working day.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts
outside an area five (5) meters from the discharge pipe.

PARAMETERS
Monthly Daily
Average Maximum
Measurement Sample
Frequency Type
Pump Log or
Wasteflow (mgd):
Continuous
Similar
Free Available Chlorine (µg/1);
200 * 500 *
2 / month
Multiple Grabs
Total Residual Chlorine (µg/l):
* *
2 / month
Multiple Grabs
Chromium (µgtl):
200 ** 200 **
2 / month
Composite
Zinc (µgll):
1,000 ** 1,000 **
2 / month
Composite
pH (SU):
6-9
Weekly
Grab
The 126 priority pollutants (40 CFR 423, Appendix A) exclusive of Zinc and Chromium
THERE SHALL BE NO CHROMIUM, ZINC, OR COPPER ADDED TO THE
TREATMENT SYSTEM EXCEPT AS PRE -APPROVED ADDITIVES TO BIOCIDAL
COMPOUNDS. 09/
Neither free available chlorine nor total residual chlorine may be discharged from any
single generating unit for more than two hours ppp�r day, unless the permittee demonstrates
to the Division of Gntertethat discharge for more ban two hours is
required for macroinvertebrate control. The 500 µg/l limitation is an instantaneous
maximum and is to be measured during the chlorine release period. The 200 µg/1
limitation is an average during the chlorine release period.
** These limitations and monitoring requirments apply only if these substances are added by
the permittee for cooling tower maintenance.
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirments specified above shall be taken at
the following locations: Discharge from the cooling tower prior to mixing with other waste
streams. Permittee may take s8O les for chlorine in the cooling tower basin.
Discharge of blowdown from the cooling tower shall be limited to the minimum discharge of
recirculation water necessary for the purpose of discharging materials contained in the process,
the further build-up of which would cause concentration in amounts exceeding limitations
established by best engineering practice.
The permittee shall notify the Division of Water Quality, Raleigh Regional Office prior to
draining the cooling tower, except during non -office hour emergencies when notification must
be made the next working day.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts
outside an area five (5) meters from the discharge pipe.

INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: not required
Downstream Location: not required
Parameters:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonsft xt�d the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes _ No /) k
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional office
recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0003425
PERNII'ITEE NAME:
FACRM NAME:
Carolina Power and Li
Roxboro Steam Electric Gener4 m P-W-�
Facility Status: _ Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major q Minor
Pipe No.: 006
Design Capacity: No flow limit
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
Flow not limited. See attached description of outfall 006
RECEIVING STREAM:Hym ►-*e
Class: B
FEB 19
Sub -Basin: 03-02-05
Reference USGS Quad: B 22 NE (please attach)
County: Person
Regional Office: Raleigh Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 4/30/97 Treatment Plant Class: Class I
Classification changes within three miles:
none
Requester
Prepared
Reviewe(
11&19�7
Date: If9-
Date: r3 Fes, m
Modeler
Date Rec.
I 11
Area (mi2): n/a 7QI0 (cfs): LAKE
Toxicty (Fathead Minnow 24 hr) Monitoring, Annual
Instantaneous Daily
Maximum Maximum
Wasteflow (mgd):
Total Suspended Solids (mg/1): 50
pH (SU): 6-9
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirments specified above
shall be taken at the point of discharge from the treatment system prior to
mixing with other sources of wastewater.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace
amount% outside an area five (5) meters from the discharge pipe.
Material storage runoff shall include rainfall to navigable waters through any
discernible, confined and/or discrete conveyance from or through coal.
Samples are to be collected after any rainfall event sufficient to cause runoff,
but not to exceed 1 per week. This monitoring requirment is applicable to any
flow up to the flow resulting from a 24 hour rainfall event with a probable
recurrence interval of once in ten years. If an impoundment is utilized by the
permittee, it shall be capable of containing a 10 year, 24 hour rainfall event.
Samples should be collected within 24 hours of the beginning of the event).

FOR APPROPRIATE DISCHARGES, LIST COMPLETE GUIDELINE LIMITATIONS BELOW
Effluent Characteristics
Outfall 0061
H
TSS
n
Average 77
Monthly Dai=9.0�.
of 6.0 to
Shall be in the raE50. 0 m
Comments
40 CFR 423.12 (b)(1) BPT
40 CFR 423.12 (b)(9) BPT
Outfall 006 contains runoff from the coal pile and other coal handling areas. These waters are routed to the retention pond for
treatment by neutralization, sedimentation, and equalization prior to being discharged directly into Hyco Reservoir.
Type of Product Produced
MWc Produced
1:fflucnC tJuidelincs Reference
Electricity (the facility is a four unit electric
generating plant using coal-fired boilers to
2462
40 CFR Part 423 - Steam Electric Power
Produce steam for turbine generators with a
Generating Point Source Category
combined net capacity of 2462 MWe.

IV ;
Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
CP & L - Roxboro Steam
NC0003425 - 006
Industrial - 100 %
Existing
Renewal
Hyco Lake
B
03-02-05
Person
Raleigh
Myhra
1/14/97
B 22 NE
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Request # 8543
& Electric Generating Plant
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2): =J
Summer 7Q10(cfs): Lake
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
Coal pile and other coal runoff. Wastewater routed to retention pond for neutralization,
sedimentation, and equalization prior to discharge to Hyco Lake.
Facility has completed their episodic tokicity test requirment of five (5) tests with a
generally > 99 % result. Therefor�A X1,11city test -Rat resex xd f4 enewai-
i4 reeo✓wln4.Je
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
Recommended by -
Instream Assessment: [ '/ihU�;�✓
Regional Supervisor•
Permits & Engineering: �a
Ff.j;tj
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
11 1991
SUPPORT BY:
I1g'�
14—�hfao�l'G C"te f M N-ah1Pv EN..6'JT 54R'Vt «.e'

PARAMETERS
$xisting Limits:
Instantaneous Daily Measurement Sample
Maximum Maximum Frequency Type
Wasteflow (mgd): 2 / month Estimate
Total Suspended Solids (mg/1): 50 2 / month Grab
pH (SU): 6-9 Weekly Grab
Acute Toxicty (Fathead Minnow 24 hr) Monitoring, Episodic, see Part III, Condition F.
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirments specified above shall be taken at
the point of discharge from the treatment system prior to mixing with other sources of
wastewater.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts
outside an area five (5) meters from the discharge pipe.
Material storage runoff shall include rainfall to navigable waters through any discernible,
confined and/or discrete conveyance from or through coal.
Samples are to be collected after any rainfall event sufficient to cause runoff, but not to exceed
1 per week. This monitoring requirment is applicable to any flow up to the flow resulting from
a 24 hour rainfall event with a probable recurrence interval of once in ten years. If an
impoundment is utilized by the permittee, it shall be capable of containing a 10 year, 24 hour
rainfall event. Monitoring should occur at the same time that the whole -effluent toxicity sample
is collected during the discharge event (samples should be collected within 24 hours of the
beginning of the event).
Recommended Limits:
Instantaneous Daily Measurement Sample
Maximum Maximum Frequency Type
Wasteflow (mgd): 2 / month Estimate
Total Suspended Solids (mg/1): 50 2 / month Grab
pH (SU): 6-9 Weekly Grab
Acute Toxicty (Fathead Minnow 24 hr) Monitoring see Part III, Condition F.
u
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirments specified above shall be taken at
the point of discharge from the treatment system prior to mixing with other sources of
wastewater.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts
outside an area five (5) meters from the discharge pipe.
Material storage runoff shall include rainfall to navigable waters through any discernible,
confined and/or discrete conveyance from or through coal.
Samples are to be collected after any rainfall event sufficient to cause runoff, but not to exceed
1 per week. This monitoring requirment is applicable to any flow up to the flow resulting
from a 24 hour rainfall event with a probable recurrence interval of once in ten years. If an
impoundment is utilized by the permittee, it shall be capable of containing a 10 year, 24 hour
rainfall event Samples should be collected within 24 hours of the beginning of the event).

Upstream Location:
Downstream Location:
Parameters:
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
not required
not required
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Ad"uacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility deco n ated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes _ No /1) 1i
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional office
recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached?
(Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

CP11 C 1W' o-X,,_ord . _0003y25 PAP Co(n
ACUTE TOXICITY MONITORING (ANNUAL)
The pemuttee shall conduct annual toxicity tests using protocols defined as definitive in E.P.A. Document
EPA/600/4-90/027 entitled "Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and Marine
Organisms." The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24 hour static
test. Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained below all waste treatment. The permittee
will conduct one test annually, with the annual period beginning in January of the calendar year of the effective
date of the permit. The annual test requirement must be performed and reported by June 30. If no discharge
occurs by June 30, notification will be made to the Division by this date. Toxicity testing will be performed on
the next discharge event for the annual test requirement.
The parameter code for this test is TAE6C. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition
will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the
appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed
in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent
toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require
immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the
initial monitoring.
�2,eCoYN.rN���(
perS &x,-
AAM Fathead 24 Version 9196

PERMIT NO.: NC0003425
PERMITTEE NAME:
FACILITY NAME:
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Carolina Power and Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric &01-rfilirfOPan fl nn R
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major _J
Pipe No.: 008
Minor
Design Capacity: 0.015 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 100 %
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
RECEIVING STREAM:Hyco Lake
Class: B
Sub -Basin: 03-02-05
Reference USGS Quad: B 22 NE (please attach)
County: Person
Regional Office:.. Raleigh Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 4/30/97 Treatment Plant Class: Class II
Classification changes within three miles:
none
/AMP7
Requested by: Je M hra Dom:
Prepared by: Date: to �,
Reviewed by: Date:
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
tge Area (mi`) Avg. Streamflow (cfs):
(cfs) (_AKE Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 30Q2 (cfs)_
ty Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic
Lin Monitoring:
Parameters
Upstream HOT acou L.nKc Location
Downstream ,m areui - Location
Effluent
Characteristics
MOkIrti0f
avert
nAt�Y
vttvu�su`M
BODS (m )
30
ys
NH 3-N (mg/1)
mororto¢,
D.O. (mg/1)
TSS (mg/1)
(30
45
F. Col. (/100 ml)
—
pH (SU)
-i
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirements
specified above, shall be taken prior to mixing with other sources of
waste.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in
other than trace amounts outside an area five (5) meters from the
discharge pipe.

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request # 8544
CP & L - Roxboro Steam & Electric Generating Plant
NC0003425 - 008
Domestic - 100 %
Existing
Renewal
Stream Characteristic:
Hyco Lake
USGS #
B
Date:
03-02-05
Drainage Area (mi2):
Person
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Raleigh
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Myhra
Average Flow (cfs):
1 / 14 / 97
30Q2 (cfs):
B 22 NE
IWC (%):
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Sewerage Treatmemt Plant - discharge to Ash Pond (002).
Monitoring will be required at outfall 008
Schedule Requirements and
Recommended
Instream A
Regional
Permits &
SUPPORT BY:
from
a,
Date: an ice}
Date:
44q-7
_ Date: 2
Date: Z Z
b 0 5 1997
fj� ^'—v 'PI-M QLyz P6RM.�T ladncE µto Sceti Pwz
i FEB - 31
Lake)
=J
DEHNR RALEIGH REGIONAL

17V
Existing Limits:
Monthly
Daily
Average
Maximum
Wasteflow (mgd):
0.015
BOD5 (mg/1);
30
45
NH3-N (mg/1):
monitor
Total Suspended Solids (mg/1):
30
45
pH (SU):
6-9
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requirments specified above shall be taken
prior to mixing with other sources of wastewater.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts
outside an area five (5) meters from the discharge pipe.
Recommended Limits:
Monthly
Daily
Average
Maximum
Wasteflow (mgd):
0.015
BOD5 (mg/1);
30
45
NH3-N (mg/1):
monitor
Total Suspended Solids (mg/1):
30
45
pH (SU):
6-9
Samples taken in compliance with the monitoring requi meets specified above shall be taken
prior to mixing with other sources of wastewater.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts
outside an area five (5) meters from the discharge pipe.

INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: not required
Downstream Location: not required
Parameters:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
AdQuacy of Existing* Treatment
Has the facility demonstr• t e ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes _ No n �}
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional office
recommendations:
If no, why not?
------------
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.