Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20200548 Ver 2_Evoke at Indian Trail PCN package_20240123CLearWaLer An EnviroScrence CompanyM ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc www.cwenv.com January 23, 2024 Ms. Amber Lipsky Ms. Stephanie Goss US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Resources Charlotte Regulatory Field Office 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit 8430 University Executive Park Drive, Ste. 611 512 N. Salisbury Street, 9th Floor Charlotte, North Carolina 28262 Raleigh, NC 27604 RE: Evoke Indian Trail Nationwide Permit 29 Application Union County, North Carolina USACE Action ID No. 2019-01147; NCDWR Project No. 20200548 Dear Ms. Lipsky and Ms. Goss, The attached Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) request is being submitted on behalf of Evoke at Indian Trail, LLC; represented by Mr. Henry Rebisz. The project site is located off Wesley Chapel Stouts Road at 5304 Rosetta Dr. (35.051108,-80.642730) in Union County, NC. The applicant is seeking Nationwide Permit 29 for temporary impacts to jurisdictional streams and permanent impacts to wetlands to develop a multi -family residential community and associated infrastructure. This project was previously permitted by the Corps on May 8, 2020 (SAW# 2019-01147); that permit expired on March 18, 2022. This request is to reissue that permit; there are no changes to the proposed plans from the original permit. Mitigation for 0.27 acres of wetland impacts have already been satisfied through NC Division of Mitigation Services (see Attachment E). Please do not hesitate to contact me at 828-698-9800 if you have any questions regarding the attached application and supplemental information. A copy of this application has been sent via email to John Hammond, US Fish and Wildlife Service; and to the 401 permit reviewer at NCDEQ Division of Water Resources — Mooresville Regional Office. Sincerely, Eric Ro zaniszyn Senior Scientist Copy issued: NC DEQ Division of Water Resources, Mooresville Regional Office — 401 Permit Reviewer US FWS, Raleigh Office — John Hammond 145 Th Avenue West, Suite B Hendersonville, NC 28792 828-698-9800 Tel Preliminary Data Entry Fields for New Actions JSAW — 2019 -1147 u 1. Project Name: Evoke Indian Trail 2. Work Type: Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial ❑✓ 3. Project Description / Purpose: The project will include five residential buildings with sixty four residential units in each building for a total of 320 units. It will include a clubhouse, pool, putting green, and 771 parking spaces. 4. Property Owner / Applicant: Henry Rebisz S. Agent / Consultant: ClearWater, an EnviroScience Company 6. Related Action ID Number(s): SAW-2019-01147 7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description: 35.051108,-80.642730; 5304 Rosetta Dr, Seven parcels off Wesley Chapel Stouts Road behind Sun Valley Shopping Center. 8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID: 07069132B 9. Project Location —County: Union 10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town : Indian Trail 11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody: South Fork Crooked Creek 12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code: Yadkin Pee -Dee/ Rocky River/03040105 Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 Regulatory Action Type: El Standard Permit Nationwide Permit # 29 ❑ Regional General Permit # ❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request ❑✓ Section 10 & 404 ❑ F]Unauthorized Pre -Application Request Activity ❑ Compliance ❑ No Permit Required Revised 20210513 CLe.arWaLer Ar; Enviro5cience Cc�npanr8 Department of the Army Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers Attn: Tommy Fennel, Chief Regulatory Division PO Box 1890 Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 -and- NC DWR, Webscape Unit Attn: Paul Wojoski 512 North Salisbury Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 I, the current landowner/managing partner of the property identified below, hereby authorize C1earWater Environmental Consultants, an EnviroScience company, to act on my behalf as my agent during the processing of_jurisdictional determination requests and permits to impact Wetlands and Water of the US subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. CEC is authorized to provide supplemental information as needed at the request of the USACE or DWR. Additionally,) authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, US Army Corps of Engineers to enter upon the property herein described for the purposes of conducting onsite investigations and issuing a determination associated with Wetlands and Waters of the US subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. Property Owner of Record: ��i E 6 j L G L.L Property Owner Address: d —S d � S V r6c L k-1 �_ Pb trt], n)(' 2 � � 6 -- Phone Number: - �1L' �� 0 5-4" Ll Email address: BEN �� ? F� 1� �,--, 1'A 1 L , Ut-\A � Property Location: 1 :C Le �'r�i � 1�1� 1 It7 �� r3•N %R i� jG � nS C. d Owner/Managing partner Signature: Owner/Managing printed name: Date: l I i 145 7th Avenue West, Suite B HendersonviIle, NC 29792 Phone: 828-698-9800 www.cwenv.com Parcel Number 07090005P Owner SUN VALLEY COMMONS LLC Mailing Address C/O THE MOSER GROUP 231 POST OFFICE DR B8 INDIAN TRAIL NC, 28079 Account Information 5311 07069132E 3111 5347 O v 07090006D 4151., 07090005P 0709000611 30 O �r 07069001 005N 0709000603007.E 006Y O 070720116 Land Value $36,600.00 Building Value $0.00 Description Total Value $36,600.00 Situs Address Acreage 1.2240 Property Class Sales Information Sale Date Sale Amount Book & Page Location Information 07669003 �3106 � ti4 07069002 #25 SUN VALLEY COMMONS MP3 OPCL513-519 / OPCL581-587 0 OLD MONROE RD COMMERCIAL Grantor Municipal Indian Trail 12 Mile Service Area Yes Administration County Zoning Code CITY School School Assignment Information Zoning Administration Indian Trail Census Tract Number 203.17 ETJ FEMA Panel 5407 Fire District Bakers FEMA Zone Soils CmB Building Information View Real Property Site Total Living Area 00 Year Build 0 District Voting Assignments (Jurisdictions) Polling Place INDIAN TRAIL School District 5 Congressional 9 LIBRARY District Precinct District #14 State House 69 Senate 35 District Parcel Number 07069132B Owner EVOKE AT INDIAN TRAIL LLC Mailing Address 2522 SUFFOLK AVE HIGH POINT NC, 27265 Account Information Land Value $4,649,700.00 Building Value $0.00 Description Total Value $4,649,700.00 Situs Address Acreage 28.1800 Property Class Sales Information OPCQ270-272 3115 WESLEY CHAPEL STOUTS RD COMMERCIAL Sale Date Sale Amount Book & Page Grantor 11/24/2020 $600,000.00 7898 0110 MOSES, TIMOTHY C Location Information Munici al p Indian Trail 12 Mile Service Area Yes Administration County Zoning Code CITY School School Assignment Information Zoning Administration Indian Trail Census Tract Number 203.17 ETJ FEMA Panel 5407 Fire District Bakers FEMA Zone Soils CmB,BuB,CnB Building Information View Real Property Site Total Living Area 00 Year Build 0 District Voting Assignments (Jurisdictions) Polling Place INDIAN TRAIL School District 5 Congressional 9 LIBRARY District Precinct District #14 State House 69 Senate 35 District oe'�F wATr' E�Q� Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑X Yes ❑ No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): X❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: ❑ Yes ❑X No For the record only for Corps Permit: ❑ Yes ❑X No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program. ❑X Yes ❑ No 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h below. ❑ Yes ❑X No 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ❑X No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Evoke Indian Trail 2b. County: Union 2c. Nearest municipality /town: Indian Trail 2d. Subdivision name: 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Evoke at Indian Trail LLC 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 7898 / 0110 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): Henry Rebisz 3d. Street address: 2522 Suffolk Ave 3e. City, state, zip: High Point, NC 27265 3f. Telephone no.: 336-403-2564 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: henryhti@hotmail.com Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑X Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Eric Romaniszyn 5b. Business name (if applicable): ClearWater Environmental Consultants 5c. Street address: 145 7th Ave West, Suite B 5d. City, state, zip: Hendersonville, NC 5e. Telephone no.: 828-698-9800 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: eromaniszyn@enviroscienceinc.com Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 07069132B 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.051108 Longitude:-80.64273 1 c. Property size: 28.18 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: South Fork Crooked Creek 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C 2c. River basin: 03040105 Rocky River 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The site consists of residential singe family homes and mobile units, mixed hardwood and deciduous forested land, maintained turfgrass lawn, open water, streams and wetlands. The surrounding land use is similar, and includes a commercial shopping district. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.754 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 733 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: See Attachment A for additional information. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: See Attachment A for additional information. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (includingall prior phases)in the past? 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Comments: see Attachment B 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑X Preliminary ❑Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Agency/Consultant Company: Clearwater Environmental Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. See Attachment B, two PJDs were issued on 8/14/2019 and 5/8/2020. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? DYes ❑ No ❑ Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. See Attachment A for additional information 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes 0 No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑X Wetlands X❑ Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of number Corps (404,10) or impact Permanent (P) or DWQ (401, other) (acres) Temporary T W1 T Land Clearing Bottomland Hardwood Forest Yes Corps 0.21 W2 P Fill Headwater Wetland No Corps 0.023 W3 P Fill Headwater Wetland No Corps 0.029 W4 P Fill Headwater Wetland No Corps 0.014 W5 P Fill Headwater Wetland Yes Corps 0.027 W6 P Fill Headwater Wetland No Corps 0.004 2g. Total Wetland Impacts: 0.307 2h. Comments: The applicant requests 0.21 acres of impacts (W1) for a temporary construction easement for a utility line and 0.097 acres of permanent wetland impacts; 0.12 acres of impacts to W1 will be in permanently maintained / mowed easement and the remaining 0.09 acres of impacts will be replanted with appropriate native hardwood trees. 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average Impact number intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream length Permanent (P) or width (linear Temporary (T) (feet) feet) S1 T Stabilization S1 PER Corps 4 40 S2 Choose one S3 Choose one S4 Choose one S5 Choose one S6 Choose one 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 40 3i. Comments: Temporary impacts to stream S1 are for a sewer line utility crossing and will be 0.0037 acres. Construction details are in Figure 5a and a working in -the -dry detail is found in Attachment C. Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. Open water impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary T 4b. Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c. Type of impact 4d. Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) 01 Choose one Choose 02 Choose one Choose 03 Choose one Choose 04 Choose one Choose 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below. 5a. Pond ID number 5b. Proposed use or purpose of pond 5c. Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d. Stream Impacts (feet) 5e. Upland (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated P1 Choose one P2 Choose one 5f. Total: 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other: 6b. Buffer Impact number— Permanent (P) or Temporary T 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact (square feet) 6g. Zone 2 impact (square feet 131 Yes/No B2 Yes/No B3 Yes/No B4 Yes/No B5 Yes/No B6 Yes/No 6h. Total Buffer Impacts: 6i. Comments: Page 5 of 10 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Impacts for the project are minimal and associated with the placement of fill in wetlands, temporary land clearing in wetlands and a temporary utility crossing in one stream. The project design avoids permanent impacts to XX acres of wetlands (82% of wetland area on site) and XX linear feet of stream (95% of stream length on site). 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. All construction equipment would be operated from high ground. Sediment and erosion control measures and best management practices would be used on -site to avoid unintended impacts to waters on and adjacent to the site. The sewer line crossing on S1 would be done "in the dry" using a coffer dam and pump around system (see detail in Attachment C). 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 0 Yes ❑ No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ 0 Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Mitigation bank 0 Payment to in -lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Type: Choose one Quantity: Quantity: Quantity: 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. 0 Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.217 acres 4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: Payment was made to NC DMS on 3/28/2022, see Attachment E. 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires Yes 0 No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes 0 No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 49.4 % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? 0 Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: A stormwater management plan will be submitted for review and approval to the Town of Indian Trail. The Town of Indian Trail is a delegated local authority for revision and approval of stormwater management plans. 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? Indian Trail 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject? Indian Trail 0 Phase II ❑ NSW 3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply): ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑Yes 0 No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑Coastal counties ❑HQW 4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ORW (check all that apply): ❑Session Law 2006-246 ❑Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ❑ Yes ❑X No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State El Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval ❑ Yes ❑ No letter.) Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes ❑X No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? ❑Yes ❑X No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in El Yes ❑X No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. The project will not result in additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality. The proposed housing development is adjacent to an existing commercial corridor in which existing amenities are sufficient to support. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. The for the town Indian Trail is by Union County Public Works. The County five treatment sewage of serviced currently owns and operates wastewater plants within the County, which is currently termed Water Reclamation Facilities (WRF).The WRF each treat wastewater from specific drainage areas within the County. The WRF are: Twelve Mile Creek, Crooked Creek, Tallwood Estates, Grassy Branch and Olde Sycamore. Union County currently has a total of 8.2 million gallons per day (MGD) of wastewater treatment capacity. Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑X Yes ❑ No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ❑X No impacts? 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. - 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? USFWS IPAC weblink and NHP Natural Heritage Data Explorer. See Attachment D for full report and database reports. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑X No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NOAA's Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Mapper. Accessed December 20, 2023 at https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/apps/efhmapper/. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ❑X No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? Data were gathered from NCHPO's HPOWEB 2.0 for General Audience; accessed December 20, 2023.The site is not within 2 miles of any Historic resources on the National Register. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes ❑X No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping Program. FEMA Map No. 3710540700J, effective 10/16/2008 (Figure 6). Eric Romaniszyn 01-17-2024 Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Date Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) Page 10 of 10 Figures 1 - 5 A Morris Park o a s Boyce 0Aa 3 Country Woods ark 3q Idlewood Acres Reigate Forest Homes , Windrow / / ood ,mot Hollow Estates � W , Settlers Matthews Landing Club View Acres / 0 t , Vance 05 / Hemby Bridge / / / -Stallings Project Boundary ngton=Rd— Vicinity Map Figure 1 Indian Trail ect Boundary Weddington Wesley Chapel Indian Trail 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles N (+/- 28 Ac) i r r J [LearWaEer Union County, NC. ITIT7 A An EnviroScienceCompany 0 0.250.5 1 Kilometers )r: EP Date: 1/924 Project #: 18859 NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Ft t • \ f - � .. � ` roof] --j�dian Trail 5 . L it •J'��'7 • �� y .� �.� � : + � era . off jl a mid L 1: Cem a f 1� �,� B park 15 —� ��f�� �hf ■ ' j ' �` Isis T• JP . ti.+, ^""�Jf ��� 'F ti6d ,� j ,� �; •�=� ';~ --- �-any 4 r^—' r- - ;�° ,• n Project Boundary :. - f 9 �• p ��. T� j ��f 6?4 Jr— i. 6 - • i ys ' / n Sep Va Y k�'. �. b82 a V ,Substation 6 y'p' 650 ` — Project Boundary USGS Topographic Map Indian Trail i 500 1,000 2, 0 Feet N 1:24K Scale Quad: Matthews (+/- 28 Ac) r 11 A[LearWaLQr Figure 2 Union County, NC. o ,00 zoo 400 600 Meters An En vir oSc i en ce Company 9 hor: EP Date: 1/924 Project#: 18859 NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Ft U: Author: EP Date: 1/924 Project #: 18859 NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Ft US Author: EP Date: 1/924 Project #: 18859 NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Ft US ;• .�C\" ! ,f. yeti -{ '� � .... s.. � a i. .e �, '- „�.�. °�; �•-:�. S.T.Q. f; fir ,- . �; •�;. :ram ,' ��� ,le ��', fi :fib Y. '.. ■ ' :'I, yi � '`-ki'•`'-� � "5y - .: .r 'r_ s .51 AIL _ r i _ •kc - x.(t; OAA Ar j ° r7 •_ ..; .14 Project Bounda ry Attachment A PCN Additional Comments Evoke at Indian Trail PCN Supplemental Information Section B.3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of the proposed project is to build a residential subdivision with apartments, associated parking and communal facilities and amenities. This project was previously permitted by the Corps on May 8, 2020 (SAW# 2019-01147); that permit for NWP 29 expired on March 18, 2022. This request is to reissue that permit. Mitigation for 0.27 acres of wetland impacts have already been satisfied through NC Division of Mitigation Services (see Attachment E). Section B.3e. Describe the overall project in detail: The Evoke at Indian Trail development will cover 28.18 acres and include five residential buildings with 64 residential units in each building for a total of 320 units. The community will include a clubhouse amenity with a pool facility and a putting green. A walking trail with a boardwalk crossing of the existing creek will extend to the commercial center adjacent to the property. In keeping with the local municipal standards, 15 percent of the net usable area of the site, 3.69 acres, will be dedicated as a tree save area. The project development will include the construction of a public street to access future development to the north and west of the site. Parking for the project is provided in accordance with the Town of Indian Trail Standards which requires 1.5 spaces for a single bedroom unit, 2.0 spaces for a two bedroom unit, and 2.5 spaces for a three bedroom unit. In addition to the spaces required by the unit count, guest spaces are required at a rate of one space for every four spaces required by unit count. A total of 760 parking spaces are required for the blend of units proposed, and 771 parking spaces are provided. Site preparation will involve land clearing and placing fill in wetland areas. It will also involve stream stabilization for a temporary crossing. The total stream impacts would be 0.0037 acres (40 If) and wetland impacts would be 0.307 acres (see Figure 5). Authorization for these is requested under a Nationwide Permit 29. Stream impact S1 and wetland impact W1 will be temporary impacts for sewer line installation. The stream crossing will be installed "in -the -dry" via open cut and embedded to allow for aquatic passage; see Figure 5a for construction details and Attachment C for a working in -the dry detail. At impact W1, the applicant will maintain a 0.12-acre (20-foot) sewer ROW through this forested wetland, this includes an easement through a portion of the adjacent parcel to tie to an existing pump station. The maintained ROW will be returned to original grade and planted with native wetland seed mix (Ernst seed mix ERNMX-132-1 or similar). An additional 0.09 acres in W1 will need to be temporarily disturbed for construction access; it will be returned to original contours and planted with appropriate native woody vegetation (sycamore, willow, elderberry), based on availability, when construction is complete. The impacts at W2, W3 and W5 are required for construction of parking areas. The W4 impact is for construction of one of the apartment buildings, and W6 is for the entrance road. Typical construction equipment will be used during development of the site, including bulldozers, excavators, backhoes, dump trucks, etc. Section B.5b Project History A NWP 29 was issued on 5/8/2020 authorizing the permanent wetland impacts of 0.217 acres (i.e., 0.097 acres associated with discharge of fill material and 0.12 acres associated with conversion of a forested wetland), temporary wetland impacts of 0.09 acres, and temporary stream impacts of 40 linear feet to facilitate the construction of a multi -family residential subdivision. No construction activity occurred and the permit expired on 3/18/2022. A mitigation payment was made to NC DMS for 0.27 credits of riparian wetland (see Attachment E). Attachment B 404 Permit and Jurisdictional Determination U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT Action Id. SAW-2019-01147 County: Union U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Matthews GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION Pennittee: Multifamily USA Scott Bayer Address: 215 N. Pine Street Charlotte, NC 28202 Telephone Number: 336-314-6169 E-mail: sbayer(dmultifamilyus.com Size (acres) 28.18 Nearest Town Monroe Nearest Waterway South Fork Crooked Creek River Basin Upper Pee Dee USGS HUC 03040105 Coordinates Latitude: 35.051108 Longitude:-80.642730 Location description: The review area is located on the west/northwest side of Wesley Chapel Stouts Road, approximately 0.4 miles north of the intersection of Wesley Chapel Stout Road and Old Monroe Road. PINS: 07069133, 07069133A, 07069212, and 07069132A. Reference review area description shown in Pre -Construction Notification package entitled "Figure 1, Vicinity Map". Description of projects area and activity: This verification authorizes the permanent wetland impacts of 0.217 acres (i.e., 0.097 acres associated with discharge of till material and 0.12 acres associated with conversion of a forested wetland), temporary wetland impacts of 0.09 acres, and temporary stream impacts of 40 linear feet to facilitate the construction of a multi -family residential subdivision. All temporary stream and wetland impacts will be restored to pre-existin6 conditions after the completion of construction. Applicable Law(s): X❑ Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) ❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403) Authorization: NWP 29. Residential Developments SEE ATTACHED NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL, AND/OR SPECIAL CONDITIONS Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed Conditions, your application signed and dated 4/22/2020, and the enclosed plans Wetland Impacts Sheets A-C dated 4/16/2020. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, a Class I administrative penalty, and/or appropriate legal action. This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization. Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Resources (telephone 919-807-6300) to determine Section 401 requirements. For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management Morehead City, NC, at (252) 808-2808. This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State or local approvals/permits. If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact Bryan Roden -Reynolds at 704-510-1440or bryan.roden-reynolds(&,,usace.army.mil. Corps Regulatory Official: RODEN REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KENNETH.1263385574 Expiration Date of Verification: 03/18/2022 Digit.ly,,,n dby R-N RlYNOLDS BRYAN KENN E I H 12653R 4 D ate: 2020 05 4812 49:26-04'00' Date: 5/8/2020 The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at http://coi-psmapu.usace.army.mil/cm apex/Pp=136:4: 0 Copy furnished: Agent: Clearwater Environmental Consultants, Inc. Alea Tuttle Address: 31 Clayton Street Asheville, NC 28801 Telephone Number: 828-698-9800 E-mail: alea(acwenv.com SAW-2019-01147 SPECIAL CONDITIONS a. In order to compensate for impacts associated with this permit, mitigation shall be provided in accordance with the provisions outlined on the most recent version of the attached Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form. The requirements of this form, including any special conditions listed on this form, are hereby incorporated as special conditions of this permit authorization. b. Please be advised that if additional impacts to waters of the U.S., either on this property or on/adjacent to this property and associated with this project/activity, are proposed at a later date, those impacts will be combined with the current impacts to waters of the U.S. and will be reviewed cumulatively. Generally, compensatory mitigation will be required if individual or cumulative (i.e., past and present) losses or degradation of waters of the U.S., are greater than 150 linear feet of perennial or intermittent stream channel and/or 0.1 acre of wetland. Additionally, cumulative impacts that result in the loss or degradation of greater than 300 linear feet of perennial or intermittent stream channel and/or 0.5 acre of wetland, will be processed under an Individual Permit. This verification of the use of the Nationwide Permit Program for this project does not imply that this office will necessarily approve any future proposal to impact waters of the U.S. on this property and/or associated with this project/activity. Action ID Number: SAW-2019-01147 County: Union Permittee: Multifamily USA, Scott Bayer Project Name: Evoke Indian Trail Date Verification Issued: 5/8/2020 Project Manager: Bryan Roden -Reynolds Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit, sign this certification and return it to the following address: US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT Attn: Bryan Roden -Reynolds Charlotte Regulatory Office U.S Army Corps of Engineers 8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615 Charlotte, North Carolina 28262 or bryan.roden-reynolds@usace.army.mil Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of Engineers representative. Failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this authorization may result in the Corps suspending, modifying or revoking the authorization and/or issuing a Class I administrative penalty, or initiating other appropriate legal action. I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in accordance with the permit conditions. Signature of Permittee Date SAW-2019-01147 MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD SUBJECT: Department of the Army Memorandum Documenting General Permit Verification 1.0 Introduction and overview: Information about the proposal subject to one or more of the Corps regulatory authorities is provided in Section 1, detailed evaluation of the activity is found in Sections 2 through 4 and findings are documented in Section 5 of this memorandum. Further, summary information about the activity including administrative history of actions taken during project evaluation is attached (ORM2 summary). 1.1 Applicant name: Multifamily USA, Scott Bayer 1.2 Activity location: Latitude: 35.051108 Longitude:-80.642730 Location description: The review area is located on the west/northwest side of Wesley Chapel Stouts Road; approximately 0.4 miles north of the intersection of Wesley Chapel Stout Road and Old Monroe Road. PINs: 07069133, 07069133A, 07069212, and 07069132A. Reference review area description shown in Pre -Construction Notification package entitled "Figure 1, Vicinity Map". 1.3 Description of activity requiring verification:This verification would authorize the permanent wetland impacts of 0.217 acres (i.e., 0.097 acres associated with discharge of fill material and 0.12 acres associated with conversion of a forested wetland), temporary wetland impacts of 0.09 acres, and temporary stream impacts of 40 linear feet to facilitate the construction of a multi -family residential subdivision. All temporary stream and wetland impacts will be restored to pre-existing conditions after the completion of construction. 1.4 Is this an After -the -Fact verification? No. 1.5 Date PCN determined complete for processing: 4/22/2020 1.6 Jurisdiction Determination completed? A Preliminary JD was completed on 5/8/2020. 1.7 Permit authority: Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344) 1.8 Applicable Permit: NWP 29. Residential Developments 1.9 Activity requires written waiver of NWP limits? No. 1.10 Activity requires a waiver from the requirements of a regional condition(s)? No. 2.0 Evaluation of the Pre -Construction Notification 2.1 Direct and indirect effects caused by the GP activity: The direct effects of the proposed activity in waters would include the loss of jurisdictional waters (as specified in Section 1.3) and their associated aquatic resource functions. The proposed activity also has the potential to result in indirect effects to waters including excess sedimentation in downstream waters, disruption and/or killing of aquatic life in the direct vicinity of the project area, increase of downstream flows, and blocking/restricting aquatic life passage transiting in and through the project area. These indirect effects are expected SAW-2019-01147 to be minimal due to design criteria and Best Management Practices (BMPs) required by Nationwide Permit General and Regional Conditions. Additionally, indirect effects would be further reduced through the implementation of BMPs required by state, local, and Federal ordinances and regulations. 2.2 Site specific factors: The review area consists of residential single-family homes and mobile units, mixed hardwoods and deciduous forested land, maintained turfgrass lawn, open water, streams, and wetlands. The surrounding land use is similar and commercial shopping district. 2.3 Coordination 2.3.1 Was the PCN coordinated with other agencies? No. Agency coordination is not required and was not conducted for the proposed project. 2.3.2 Was the PCN coordinated with other Corps offices? No. 2.4 Mitigation 2.4.1 Provide brief description of how the activity has been designed on -site to avoid and minimize adverse effects, both temporary and permanent, to waters of the United States to the maximum extent practicable at the project site:The applicant provided a detailed statement describing their efforts to avoid and minimized impacts to waters of the United States on the project site in the preconstruction notification. Based on this information, the Corps believes the applicant has avoid and minimized impacts to waters of the United State to the maximum extent practicable. 2.4.2 Is compensatory mitigation required for unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources to reduce the individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects to a minimal level? Yes. Provide rationale: Compensatory mitigation is required to ensure minimal adverse environmental effects. Compensatory mitigation is required to ensure minimal adverse environmental effects. The loss of wetlands associated with the activity is greater than 0.10 acre. 2.4.3 Type and location of compensatory mitigation Is the impact in the service area of an approved mitigation bank? Yes. If yes, does the mitigation bank have appropriate number and resource type of credits available? No. Is the impact in the service area of an approved in -lieu fee program? Yes. If yes, does the in -lieu fee program have the appropriate number and resource type of credits available? Yes. Selected compensatory mitigation type/location(s): See Table 1 SAW-2019-01147 Table 1: Mitigation Type and Location Mitigation bank credits In -lieu fee program credits x Perm ittee-responsible mitigation under a watershed approach Perm ittee-res onsible mitigation, on -site and in -kind Perm ittee-responsible mitigation, off -site and/or out of kind Does the selected compensatory mitigation option deviate from the order of the options presented in §332.3(b)(2)-(6)? N/A. If yes, provide the rationale for the deviation, including the likelihood for ecological success and sustainability, location of the compensation site relative to the impact site and their significance within the watershed, and/or the costs of the compensatory mitigation project (see 33 CFR §332.3(a)(1)): 2.4.4 Amount of compensatory mitigation: 0.27 acres of wetland credits Rationale for required compensatory mitigation amount: This amount of compensatory mitigation is necessary to replace the permanent loss of WOUS and temporal loss at the mitigation site. Compensatory mitigation for permanent impacts to 0.097 acres of wetlands would be required at a ratios of 1.5:1 to 1.75:1. These ratios are appropriate because the North Carolina Wetland Methodology Assessment was conducted for all impacted wetlands. Wetlands W1, W2, W4, W5, and W6 were rated low quality and Wetland W7 was rated medium quality. In addition, compensatory mitigation for wetland conversion impacts of 0.12 acres would be required at a ratio of 1:1. 3.0 Compliance with Other Laws, Policies and Requirements 3.1 Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) 3.1.1 ESA action area: The action area includes the waters of the United States that will be directly affected by the proposed work or structures and uplands directly affected as a result of authorizing the work or structures. 3.1.2 Has another federal agency taken steps to document compliance with Section 7 of the ESA and completed consultation(s) as required? No. Click here to enter text. 3.1.3 Known species/critical habitat present? No. The Corps has determined that it has fulfilled its responsibilities under Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA. IPAC Species in Union County: Name: Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata) Status: Endangered Name: Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) Status: Endangered Name: Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) Status: Endangered Effect determination(s), including no effect, for all known species/habitat, and basis for determination(s): Based on the latest version of the Natural Heritage Program's NHEO data, there are listed species located within or in the vicinity of the action area and this activity is one that would not affect those listed species. The Corps has determined the proposed activity will not directly or indirectly affect any species subject to the ESA. SAW-2019-01147 3.1.4 Consultation with either the National Marine Fisheries Service and/or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was initiated and completed as required, for any determinations other than "no effect" (see the attached "Summary" sheet for begin date, end date and closure method of the consultation). Based on a review of the information above, the Corps has determined that it has fulfilled its responsibilities under Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA. 3.2 Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) The NWPs/RGPs were coordinated with the NMFS during the permit renewal process. NMFS coordination/EFH consultation is required if the activity affects SAV. This activity does not affect SAV. Therefore, NMFS coordination/EFH consultation has been completed. 3.2.1 Has another federal agency taken steps to comply with EFH provisions of Magnuson -Stevens Act? No. 3.2.2 Did the proposed project require review under the Magnuson -Stevens Act? No. 3.3 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106) 3.3.1 Section 106 permit area -The permit area includes those areas comprising waters of the United States that will be directly affected by the proposed work or structures, as well as activities outside of waters of the U.S. because all three tests identified in 33 CFR 325, Appendix C(g)(1) have been met. Final description of the permit area: All three test have been met and portions of the larger project undertaken outside of waters of the U.S. are in the permit area. Activities undertaken outside WOUS are included in the permit area because those activities are directly associated and integrally related with the authorized work and those activities would not occur but for the authorization of the work within the WOUS. 3.3.2 Has another federal agency taken steps to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and completed consultation(s) as required? No. 3.3.3 Known cultural resource sites present and/or survey or other additional information needed? No. Based on the NCDCR "HPOWEB" service, aerial photographs, and a site visit, there are no known historic properties located in the permit area or in close proximity to the permit area. Effect determination and basis for that determination: The Corps has determined the proposed activity has no potential to cause effects to properties listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, because the project is located in areas that have been extensively modified. 3.3.4 Consultation was initiated and completed as required with the appropriate agencies, tribes and/or other parties for any determinations other than "no potential to cause effects" (see the attached "Summary" sheet for consultation type, begin date, end date and closure method of the consultation). The Corps has determined that it has fulfilled its responsibilities under Section 106 of the NHPA. 3.4 Tribal Trust Responsibilities SAW-2019-01147 3.4.1 Was government -to -government consultation conducted with Federally -recognized Tribe(s)? No. There are no known tribal interests in the project area. Provide a description of any consultation(s) conducted including results and how concerns about significant effects to protected tribal resources, tribal rights and/or Indian lands were addressed. The Corps has determined that it has fulfilled its tribal trust responsibilities. 3.4.2 Other Tribal including any discussion of Tribal Treaty rights? Select Yes or No. 3.5 Section 401 of the Clean Water Act — Water Quality Certification (WQC) 3.5.1 Is a Section 401 WQC required, and if so, has the certification been issued or waived? A general WQC has been issued for this permit. 3.6 Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) 3.6.1 Is a CZMA consistency concurrence required, and if so, has the concurrence been issued, waived or presumed? N/A, a CZMA consistency concurrence is not required. 3.7 Wild and Scenic Rivers Act 3.7.1 Is the projectlocated in a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System, or in a river officially designated by Congress as a "study river" for possible inclusion in the system? No. According to http://www.rivers.gov, the proposed project area is not within a designated or study river. 3.8 Effects on Corps Civil Works Projects (33 USC 408) 3.8.1 Does the applicant also require permission under Section 14 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC 408) because the activity, in whole or in part, would alter, occupy, or use a Corps Civil Works project? No, there are no Corps Civil Works project(s) in or near the vicinity of the proposal. 4.0 Special Conditions 4.1 Are special conditions required to ensure minimal effects, protect the public interest and/or ensure compliance of the activity with any of the laws above? Yes. 4.2 Required special condition(s) Special condition: a. In order to compensate for impacts associated with this permit, mitigation shall be provided in accordance with the provisions outlined on the most recent version of the attached Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form. The requirements of this form, including any special conditions listed on this form, are hereby incorporated as special conditions of this permit authorization. b. Please be advised that if additional impacts to waters of the U.S., either on this property or on/adjacent to this property and associated with this project/activity, are proposed at a later date, those impacts will be combined with the current impacts to waters of the U.S. and will be reviewed cumulatively. Generally, compensatory mitigation will be required if individual SAW-2019-01147 or cumulative (i.e., past and present) losses or degradation of waters of the U.S., are greater than 150 linear feet of perennial or intermittent stream channel and/or 0.1 acre of wetland. Additionally, cumulative impacts that result in the loss or degradation of greater than 300 linear feet of perennial or intermittent stream channel and/or 0.5 acre of wetland, will be processed under an Individual Permit. This verification of the use of the Nationwide Permit Program for this project does not imply that this office will necessarily approve any future proposal to impact waters of the U.S. on this property and/or associated with this project/activity. Rationale:See Section 2.4.2. 5.0 Determination 5.1 Waiver request conclusion, if required or select N/A: N/A. 5.2 The activity, with the required mitigation, will result in no more than minimal individual and cumulative adverse effects on the aquatic environment and will not be contrary to the public interest, provided the permittee complies with the special conditions identified above. 5.3 This activity, as described, complies with all terms and conditions of the permit identified in Section 1.5. PREPARED BY: RODEN Digitally signed by RODEN REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KENNE REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KENNETH.1263 385574 THI263385574 Date: 2020.05.0812:49:02-04'00' Bryan Roden -Reynolds Date: 5/8/2020 Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form Permittee: Multifamily USA, Scott Bayer Action ID: SAW-2019-01147 Project Name: Evoke Indian Trail County: Union Instructions to Permittee: The Permittee must provide a copy of this form to the Mitigation Sponsor, either an approved Mitigation Bank or the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS), who will then sign the form to verify the transfer of the mitigation responsibility. Once the Sponsor has signed this form, it is the Permittee's responsibility to ensure that to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Project Manager identified on page two is in receipt of a signed copy of this form before conducting authorized impacts, unless otherwise specified below. If more than one mitigation Sponsor will be used to provide the mitigation associated with the permit, or if the impacts and/or the mitigation will occur in more than one S-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC), multiple forms will be attached to the permit, and the separate forms for each Sponsor and/or HUC must be provided to the appropriate mitigation Sponsors. Instructions to Sponsor: The Sponsor must verify that the mitigation requirements (credits) shown below are available at the identified site. By signing below, the Sponsor is accepting full responsibility for the identified mitigation, regardless of whether or not they have received payment from the Permittee. Once the form is signed, the Sponsor must update the bank ledger and provide a copy of the signed form and the updated bank ledger to the Permittee, the USACE Project Manager, and the Wilmington District Mitigation Office (see contact information on page 2). The Sponsor must also comply with all reporting requirements established in their authorizing instrument. Permitted Impacts and Compensatory Mitigation Requirements: Permitted Impacts Requiring Mitigation* 8-digit HUC and Basin: 03040105, Yadkin River Basin Stream Impacts (linear feet) Wetland Impacts (acres) Warm Cool Cold Riparian Riverine Riparian Non-Riverine Non -Riparian Coastal 0.217 *If more than one mitigation sponsor will be used for the permit, only include impacts to be mitigated by this sponsor. Compensatory Mitigation Requirements: 8-digit HUC and Basin: 03040105, Yadkin River Basin Stream Mitigation (credits) Wetland Mitigation (credits) Warm Cool Cold Riparian Riverine Riparian Non-Riverine Non -Riparian Coastal 0.27 Mitigation Site Debited: (List the name of the bank to be debited. For umbrella banks, also list the specific site. For NCDMS, list NCDMS. If the NCDMS acceptance letter identifies a specific site, also list the specific site to be debited). Section to be completed by the Mitigation Sponsor Statement of Mitigation Liability Acceptance: I, the undersigned, verify that I am authorized to approve mitigation transactions for the Mitigation Sponsor shown below, and I certify that the Sponsor agrees to accept full responsibility for providing the mitigation identified in this document (see the table above), associated with the USACE Permittee and Action ID number shown. I also verify that released credits (and/or advance credits for NCDMS), as approved by the USACE, are currently available at the mitigation site identified above. Further, I understand that if the Sponsor fails to provide the required compensatory mitigation, the USACE Wilmington District Engineer may pursue measures against the Sponsor to ensure compliance associated with the mitigation requirements. Mitigation Sponsor Name: Name of Sponsor's Authorized Representative: Signature of Sponsor's Authorized Representative Date of Signature Conditions for Transfer of Compensatory Mitigation Credit: • Once this document has been signed by the Mitigation Sponsor and the USACE is in receipt of the signed form, the Permittee is no longer responsible for providing the mitigation identified in this form, though the Permittee remains responsible for any other mitigation requirements stated in the permit conditions. • Construction within jurisdictional areas authorized by the permit identified on page one of this form can begin only after the USACE is in receipt of a copy of this document signed by the Sponsor, confirming that the Sponsor has accepted responsibility for providing the mitigation requirements listed herein. For authorized impacts conducted by the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), construction within jurisdictional areas may proceed upon permit issuance; however, a copy of this form signed by the Sponsor must be provided to the USACE within 30 days of permit issuance. NCDOT remains fully responsible for the mitigation until the USACE has received this form, confirming that the Sponsor has accepted responsibility for providing the mitigation requirements listed herein. • Signed copies of this document must be retained by the Permittee, Mitigation Sponsor, and in the USACE administrative records for both the permit and the Bank/ILF Instrument. It is the Permittee's responsibility to ensure that the USACE Project Manager (address below) is provided with a signed copy of this form. • If changes are proposed to the type, amount, or location of mitigation after this form has been signed and returned to the USACE, the Sponsor must obtain case -by -case approval from the USACE Project Manager and/or North Carolina Interagency Review Team (NCIRT). If approved, higher mitigation ratios may be applied, as per current District guidance and a new version of this form must be completed and included in the USACE administrative records for both the permit and the Bank/ILF Instrument. Comments/Additional Conditions: A letter from NCDMS, confirming they are willing and able to accept the applicant's compensatory mitigation responsibility, dated 4/21/2020 was included with the preconstruction notification. This form is not valid unless signed below by the USACE Project Manager and by the Mitigation Sponsor on Page 1. Once signed, the Sponsor should provide copies of this form along with an updated bank ledger to:1) the Permittee, 2) the USACE Project Manager at the address below, and 3) the Wilmington District Mitigation Office, Attn: Todd Tugwell, 11405 Falls of Neuse Road, Wake Forest, NC27587 (email: todd.tugwell@usace.army.mil). Questions regarding this form or any of the permit conditions may be directed to the USACE Project Manager below. USACE Project Manager: Bryan Roden -Reynolds USACE Field Office: Charlotte Regulatory Office US Army Corps of Engineers 8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615 Charlotte, North Carolina 28262 Email: bryan.rode n-reynolds@usace.army.miI RODEN Digitally signed by RODEN REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KENNETH.1263 REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KENNETH.1263385574 385574 Date: 2020.05.08 12:48:40-04'00' USACE Project Manager Signature 5/8/2020 Date of Signature Current Wilmington District mitigation guidance, including information on mitigation ratios, functional assessments, and mitigation bank location and availability, and credit classifications (including stream temperature and wetland groupings) is available at http://ribits.usace.army.mil >— a� a ago z' 1 � P r LL C F=•� w o q° t `m t43 oao � 4 s3 W z zLU • „ a r - ' �`�� -� J / "• - of z N w VIP :D E- r u � z Q Jz° :DLoQ I /i w Y m _ U ° bi' / LO ILL Lu z - o 0 w o o Q w w � o y / � U Q Wt9 of Z In ^ a S�I1� , LIJ m z N o � V m � � a> Z' >'E2 m a /� M N 3 � N — a Z WW Wd Zb'6b'E OZOZ/bl/P b-P'ZZ£OOZOZ ­d.ul P�eNeM s1dtj., Sb89\sli,q,q,\p!n \DMC\pli-1 Pul Te ay on3 ]N-?Sb89\Ztl sy bid Peel\X a Uw mV Va a mE m � Z 1I VV `w A c � O a a a a v r o v ry� v r r i d d O O ❑ L � � E � � � LU s N a Q J r Lu z w o W � an nl 0 w U 5 m O i � U �} Il N I O Lu m 5 W z Q � o 0 I o w Y 2 > V] o Q w w o y LUO Z J— cNN ai U`r2 ^LU m z 0 °m V O � � N — Z WW Wd 9Z05'E OZOZ/bl/6 'fi^^P'LZ£OOZOZ 1aed.ul Pu eNeM sldt+ay on3 Sb99\sli.9!4x3\I!n!J\9M0\I�ei1 uaipul le ay on3 ]N-?Sb89\Ztl sy�a fo id Puel\X a k a a d o a r c z r rezoo F= U � 1O ' $ E E � 3 Y" E � UJ Cl. CL U ' � a I O 0 a / U � IV All / O \ J_ z N QLU '- r� z � j pQ �nz Lu Lo � � U / W rrN� I� U O U N � � � N � v y m 7 w L o 0 Q W O Y � m � ° Q z o -1-mm wo m ❑ ❑ ❑ 'V O � � N — WW Wd OILS 'E OZOZ/bL/P b-P'ZZ£OOZOZ 1eed.ul Pue11,A sLdV,1.,3 Sb89\sli.9!4x3\I!n!J\9M0\I�ei1 uaipul le ayon3 ]N-?S1,99\Ztl s ,bld Puel\X a a a a � i o m $ O a H ~ m 0 m 0 � 0 r o P ti J_ N z �wN � ��� z Q � U �JJ W m f �l U N � Lu N C C) � Y � m z Q 5 W z 0 0 Q W O Y � o Q w z c� w o y LUO Z J- cNN ai O`r2 ^LU m z 0 °m V Z1 >F=v m 'V O � � N — Z WW Wd OS'LS'E OZOZ/bL/P 'b-P'ZZ£OOZOZ 1eed.ul Pue11,A sldV,j. 3 Sb89\sli.9!4x3\I!n!J\9M0\I�ei1 uaipul le ay on3 ]N-?Sb89\Ztl s ,bld Puel\X Wd OE'ZS'E OZOZ/bL/p' P'ZZ£OOZOZ 1eed.ul PeeNeM sldt+eyon3 Sb89\sli.9!4x3\I!n!J\9M0\I�ei1-IPII le ayon3 ]N-?Sb89\?d sy .b, Peel\X Determination of Jurisdiction: A. ® There are waters, including wetlands on the above described project area that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Please note, if work is authorized by either a general or nationwide permit, and you wish to request an appeal of an approved JD, the appeal must be received by the Corps and the appeal process concluded prior to the conunencement of any work in waters of the United States and prior to any work that could alter the hydrology of waters of the United States. B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. C. ❑ There are waters, including wetlands within the above described project area that are subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference jurisdictional determination issued DATE. Action ID: FILE NUMBER. Basis For Determination: See the preliminary iurisdictional determination form dated 5/8/2020. Remarks: None. E. Attention USDA Program Participants This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular- site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work. F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdiction determinations as indicated in B and C above). This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdiction determination for the above described site. If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address: US Army Corps of Engineers South Atlantic Division Attn: Phillip Shannin, Review Officer 60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801 Phone: (404) 562-5137 In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal under- 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable. **It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.** Corps Regulatory Official: RODENREYNOLDS.BRYAN.KENNETH.1263385574DIyrcauy,ig-dbyRODENREYNOLDSBRYANKENNETH1263395574 Date: 20MOSM 1248,16-0404' Bryan Roden -Reynolds Date of JD: 5/8/2020 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND REQUEST FOR APPEAL Applicant: Multifamily USA, Scott Bayer File Number: SAW-2019-01147 Date: 5/8/2020 Attached is: See Section below INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B PERMIT DENIAL C APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D ❑X PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision. Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mi]/Missions/CivilWorks/Re�ZulatorVProaraniandPerniits.asl)x or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit. • ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. • OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below. B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit • ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. • APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information. • ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD. • APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD. SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record. POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION: If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may appeal process you may contact: also contact: District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Review Officer Attn: Bryan Roden -Reynolds CESAD-PDO Charlotte Regulatory Office U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division U.S Army Corps of Engineers 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15 8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801 Charlotte, North Carolina 28262 Phone: (404) 562-5137 RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportuni to participate in all site investi ations. Date: Telephone number: Signature of appellant or agent. For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to: District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Bryan Roden -Reynolds, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to: Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801 Phone: (404) 562-5137 PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 5/8/2020 B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Multifamily USA, Scott Bayer, 215 N. Pine Street, Charlotte, NC 28202 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Evoke Indian Trail, SAW- 2019-01147 D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The review area is located on the west/northwest side of Wesley Chapel Stouts Road; approximately 0.4 miles north of the intersection of Wesley Chapel Stout Road and Old Monroe Road. PINS: 07069133, 07069133A, 07069212, and 07069132A. Reference review area description shown in Pre -Construction Notification package entitled "Figure 1, Vicinity Map". (USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: NC County: Union City: Monroe Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.051108 Longitude:-80.642730 Universal Transverse Mercator: Name of nearest waterbody: South Fork Crooked Creek E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ®Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 04/22/2020 ❑ Field Determination. Date(s): TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY JURISDICTION Feature Latitude Longitude Estimated Type of aquatic Geographic authority to (decimal (decimal amount of resources (i.e., which the aquatic degrees) degrees) aquatic wetland vs. resource "may be" resources in non -wetland subject (i.e., Section 404 review area waters) or Section 10/404) (acreage and linear feet, if applicable SEE ATTACHED TABLE 1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items are included in the administrative record and are appropriately cited: ❑X Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requester: Map: Figures 1-5 OData sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requester. Datasheets: © Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ❑Corps navigable waters' study: ❑U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ❑USGS NHD data: ❑USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps: 0 U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Figure 2, USGS Topographic Map (1:24,000 Matthews, NO ONatural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Figure 4, USDA Soils Map (Web Soil Survey of Union County) ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s): ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: ❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 4929) ❑X Photographs: ❑X Aerial (Name & Date): Figure 1, Vicinity Map, Figure 3, Aerial Photograph, and Figure 5, Delineation Map (Undated) or ❑ Other (Name & Date): ❑Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: ❑ Other information (please specify): IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations. RODEN Digitally signed by RODEN REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KENN REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KENNETH.126 3385574 ETH.1263385574 Date: 2020.05.08 12:47:50-04'00' Signature and date of Regulatory staff member completing PJD 5/8/2020 Signature and date of person requesting PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable)' i Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established time dame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action. TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY JURISDICTION Site number Latitude (decimal degrees) Longitude (decimal degrees) Estimated amount of aquatic resource in review area (acreage and linear feet, if applicable) Type of aquatic resource (i.e., wetland vs. non -wetland waters) Geographic authority to which the aquatic resource "may be" subject (i.e., Section 404 or Section 10/404) W1 35.05110 -80.64290 1.54 wetland Section 404 W2 35.05120 -80.64260 0.004 wetland Section 404 W3 35.05220 -80.64480 0.05 wetland Section 404 W4 32.05280 -80.64320 0.023 wetland Section 404 W5 35.05470 -80.64S10 0.014 wetland Section 404 W6 35.05288 -80.64347 0.029 wetland Section 404 W7 35.05516 -80.64530 0.045 wetland Section 404 W8 35.05567 -80.64S32 0.049 wetland Section 404 S1 35.05090 -80.64280 351 non -wetland Section 404 S2 35.05190 -80.64449 382 non -wetland Section 404 OW1 35.05547 i -80.64S37 0.216 non -wetland Section 404 Evoke I nci an Tral (q- 28.18 AG) Potentially Jutisdietional Vetter kw and ( A[) Strea m( LI) Open NWer ( AC) �� eC� �� Wl 1.54 S1 351 Ow 4.216 W2 R 004 S2 382 Vd3 Q 05 NN4 Q 023 : Vv5 a 014 f Vi6 R 029 W7 Q 045 f ` w 0 049 L 0M -raral 1754 1 733 0.216 i IN s, �,,,;,�',� `\ •�." �rr.w 1, k Fy .y T per • .-;�, . 1 F • ^ 7 \1\t A F � f _ _r_ a \r•f 1 • I r D Prri ed Area f Wi nead on 5trea m Val and 0 open wale Cd Vat 0 Parcd Lines Addti onal Area ( 10. 6 AQ Nsd ng P30Issued & 14.2019 0 Non 3uisdcti and Star m Voter Pond Uri on Court y, North Carolina CLearWaLer 32 Clayton 9t AshcAillr, North Carolina28801 250 500 iiii DI h neat' on Nhp Site Wineated on June 17, 2019, Feb 1 a 2020 and Arch 11, 2020 Fi eure 5 ROY COOPER Governor MICHAEL S. REGAN Secretary S. DANIEL SMITH Director Mr. Scott Bayer Multifamily USP 215 N. Pine St. Charlotte, NC 28202 NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quality June 17, 2020 DWR# 20-0548 Union County Subject: APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions Evoke, Indian Trail Dear Mr. Bayer: You have our approval, in accordance with the General Certification and those conditions listed below, for the purpose proposed in your application dated May 4, 2020, and received by the Division of Water Resources (the Division) on May 7, 2020, and subsequent information on June 4, 2020. After reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is covered by Water Quality General Certification Number 4139 which can be viewed on our web site at https:Hdeg.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources- Permits/wastewater-branch/401-wetlands-buffer-permits/401-401-isolated-wetlands-waters- program The General Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 29 once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits before proceeding with your project, including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non -Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations. The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification. It is advised that all conditions of the Certification are reviewed prior to initiation of the project. In addition to the requirements of the Certification, you must also comply with the following conditions: This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send us a new application for a new Certification. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 300 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter; and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. 15A NCAC 02H .0506 and 15A NCAC 02H .0507 2. The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at the approved impact areas has commenced. 15A NCAC 02H .0502 (e) D EQ�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 :Gg rH CTvr„ wn n��n,�a�i m env�.unmemai o�:uN 704,663.1699 3. Approved Impacts: Type of Impact Amount Approved Temporary Impact Amount Approved Permanent Impact Stream 40 linear ft. 0 linear ft. Wetland (BLHW) 0 acre 0.37 acre 4. The sewer line through the wetland shall be returned to the original elevation to maintain wetland hydrologic connectivity and flow. The wetland shall be avoided if at time of construction and design, another sewer connection becomes available and can reasonably accessed. 5. Diversion Ditches and other storm water conveyances as related to the sediment and erosion control measures shall be matted and/or stabilized to reduce sediment loss and turbidity. This includes interior/exterior slopes of sediment basins. 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(3) and (c)(3) 6. Bare/fill slopes in excess of 10 feet in height and within 30 feet of surface waters shall be matted. 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(3) and (c)(3) 7. Water Quality/Stormwater: Please provide documentation showing that water quality from the development will not be impaired. A storm water management plan in lieu of such documentation is acceptable if approved by a delegated or state authority. 15A NCAC 2H .1000 8. Use of native vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques is recommended where practicable instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods. If riprap is necessary, it shall not be placed in the streambed, unless approved by DWR 9. During the construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in waters of the U.S., or protected riparian buffers. 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(3) 10. No rock, sand or other materials shall be dredged from the stream channel except where authorized by this Certification. 15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3) 11. The permittee shall report to the Mooresville Regional Office any noncompliance with this certification, any violation of stream or wetland standards [including but not limited to sediment impacts, and any violation of state regulated riparian buffer rules. Information shall be provided orally within 24 hours (or the next business day if a weekend or holiday) from the time the applicant became aware of the circumstances. A written submission shall also be provided within 5 business days of the time the applicant becomes aware of the circumstances. The written submission shall contain a description of the noncompliance, and its causes; the period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times, if the noncompliance has not been corrected, the anticipated time compliance is expected to continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance. The Division may waive the written submission requirement on a case -by -case basis. 15A NCAC 02B .0200 12. The Permittee shall ensure that the final design drawings adhere to the permit and to the permit drawings submitted for approval. 15A NCAC 02H .0507 (c) and 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(2) and (c)(2) 13. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return a "Certificate of Completion" form to the 401/Wetlands Branch of the Division using the following link: https:Hedocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Certificate-of-Completion. 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c) This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of the General Statute 150B by filing a written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of the Administrative Hearings (hereby known as OAH). A petition form may be obtained from the OAH at http://www.ncoah.com/or by calling the OAH Clerk's Office at (919) 431-3000. Within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of this notice, a petition must be filed with the OAH. A petition is considered filed when the original and one (1) copy along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received in the OAH during normal office hours (Monday through Friday, 8:00 am to 5:00 pm, excluding state holidays). The petitions may be faxed to the OAH at (919) 431-3100, provided the original and one (1) copy of the petition along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within five (5) business days following the faxed transmission. Mailing address for the OAH: If sending via US Postal Service: Office of Administrative Hearings 6714 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-6714 If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.) Office of Administrative Hearings 1711 New Hope Church Rd. Raleigh, NC 27609-6285 One (1) copy of the petition must also be served on DEQ as follows: Mr. Bill Lane, General Counsel Department of Environmental Quality 1601 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 This letter completes the review by the Division under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699. Sincerely, CDocu8igned dy: 't'" H P44%" for F161F669AM84A3... Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Section Mooresville Regional Office, DEQ Attachment cc: Bryan Rhoden -Reynolds, Army Corps of Engineers, Charlotte, email Alea Tuttle, Clearwater Env., alea(a)cwenv.com DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch file MRO, Land Quality CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION NCDWR Project No.: Applicant: Project Name: Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification: County: Certificate of Completion Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401 Wetland & Buffer Permitting Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Resources, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1617. This form may be returned to NCDWR by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these. Applicant's Certification I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials. Signature: Agent's Certification Date: I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials. Signature: Engineer's Certification Partial Final Date: I, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project for the Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials. Signature Registration No. Date _ Attachment C Project Plans ZOZSZ ON '31101LIVH0 - ti 133LIlS 3NId N SLZ o ati M VSn.l11WVd I11nkv `— 3ej=NVId ld3ON0O,3N� o N N ON 'WL11 NV10NI 3 S1N3W18VdV.l311VA NnS `JNINOZ32i d e �a k� ado � 2 _S10UjS RO � LU I � I IAMV V — L_ ry 1 a � g 0 W Q� o a o p zoo ��„ E— �115 W < Wm ¢ J O �w Z� W zz 2� n a _ O x cOnW ¢N CL U �. Yao z v �3 m« o� w J 0 Yo II_ > �W a ❑ z C) as Z Q p U O 'n u� Zn [KO i4 ~ ~ z Q W _ - W Q N N Z � z w z� J m� III Wm am z ¢W _ S w p U z jd Ix,way z � �- �� z �W Z �Z 1=aw �w �z� Q a �C�o o� , �Z z �z oma O V 4� Boa W t o Ig W mij W 3 z a z m IL Wt9 N - (5�1 N i w W U �+ mz04 0 Qom. wJ o � 3 N - 0 Z WLu - OE ZS'E OZOZ/bl/b'6mp-LZPOOZOZ —d-I 4NU' M0\11111 ueipul 1e'1o13 ON-J-S489\Zd s111111d puel\X J_ N z w N _ F- U— s_ Wt9 Z Qi �• W NNN C �U 0 f11 m 4 V of Z > F v a6 O M W oa 3 N C Z WW - Zb 64 E OZO /WV'6mp-LUMOZ —d-I "Do0\I111-11PI 11'1' 13 DN-J-S489\Zd sl1o(oid puel\X v U m nU u m N E o a J� a0 U m �. &B mE S M o � as �s r 3 Eo } a m m gQ g� a *MWM` v �ff m 3 Q J Q Q J Q Q J Q v o 0 yo --------- LU Zi /���� I F p W Q Q Q oz uj N O W N �cnz �z � Lo N U LUO z Q� � cNN W U v f^ CpzN V co Z 0 F= v O M _R N C z WL.0 -9?OS'E UOVWI '6mp-LUMOZ—d-I "Do MO\1!11lueipul 1e'4o13 ON-J-Sb89\Zd s111111d puel\X � O 3 — tj E >- � O U O CO 0zo CL U J_ N z w N _ F- U- N � rrTT1�1� I� m w U m� z O U Q � N C O Y m z Q w w o Y = m °w h o m �n —L-C� Wt9 Z ❑ ❑ C �. N N ® ® ® W � C mUv 0 � O Z > F v a6 p C � N _ Z WL.0 - OL LS'E OZ00WI '6mp-LUMOZ —d-I 4NU` M0\11111 ueipul 1e'1o13 ON-J-S489\Zd s111111d puel\X - OS LS'E OZ00WI '6mp-LUMOZ —dw U,.^DM0\I!111-11 I —01n3 DN-J-SV?9\Zd SUofo Id pu el\X 0 W Q� o a o p zoo ��„ E— �115 W < Wm ¢ J O �w Z� W zz 2� n a _ O x cOnW ¢N CL U �. Yao z v �3 m« o� w J 0 Yo II_ > �W a ❑ z C) as Z Q p U O 'n u� Zn [KO i4 ~ ~ z Q W _ - W Q N N Z � z w z� J m� III Wm am z ¢W _ S w p U z jd Ix,way z � �- �� z �W Z �Z 1=aw �w �z� Q a �C�o o� , �Z z �z oma O V 4� Boa W t o Ig W mij W 3 z a z m IL Wt9 N - (5�1 N i w W U �+ mz04 0 Qom. wJ o � 3 N - 0 Z WLu - OE ZS'E OZOZ/bl/b'6mp-LZPOOZOZ —d-I 4NU' M0\11111 ueipul 1e'1o13 ON-J-S489\Zd s111111d puel\X Attachment D Threatened and Endangered Species Report Evoke at Indian Trail Project Approximately +/- 28 acres Union County, NC Preliminary Threatened and Endangered Species Review and Habitat Assessment Prepared For Mr. Arthur Rebisz Evoke at Evoke at Indian Trail Project LLC 2522 Suffolk Ave High Point, NC 27265 Prepared By CLearWaLer An EnviroScience Company 145 7t" Avenue W Suite B Hendersonville, NC 28792 January 17, 2024 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................2 2.0 METHODOLOGY.........................................................................................................2 3.0 HABITAT CLASSIFICATION.......................................................................................3 3.1 Stream.............................................................................................................................. 3 3.2 Wetland............................................................................................................................ 3 3.3 Mixed Forest.................................................................................................................... 3 3.4 Disturbed Field................................................................................................................ 4 3.5 Open Water...................................................................................................................... 4 3.6 Soils..................................................................................................................................5 4.0 PROTECTED SPECIES.............................................................................................. 5 4.1 Atlantic Pigtoe................................................................................................................. 5 4.2 Carolina Heelsplitter....................................................................................................... 5 4.3 Michaux's Sumac............................................................................................................ 6 4.4 Schweinitz's Sunflower.................................................................................................. 6 4.5 Tricolored Bat.................................................................................................................. 7 5.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................8 6.0 REFERENCES............................................................................................................9 List of Tables Table 1: US Fish and Wildlife Service IPaC - Official Species List. Table 2: USDA Soil Units occurring within the project boundary. List of Figures Figure 1: Site Vicinity Map Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map Figure 3: Study Area Map Figure 4: Habitat Map Figure 5: NRCS Soils Map Appendices Appendix A: US Fish and Wildlife Service IPaC - Official Species List and NC Natural Heritage Program Data Appendix B: Photolog 1.0 INTRODUCTION The following report includes methods used and results for a threatened and endangered species survey and habitat assessment for the project known as Evoke at Indian Trail. The project site occupies an approximately 28-acre tract along Wesley Chapel Stouts Rd. and Rosetta Dr. in Indian Trail, Union County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The site ranges in elevation from 640 feet to 664 feet above mean sea level (MSL; Figure 2). The survey was conducted to determine the occurrence of or the potential for existence of federally listed threatened and endangered animal and plant species, in addition to the bald eagle, within the study area (Figure 3). Completion of this survey was directed by and complies with three current state and federal regulations: the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 USC 1531-1543), the North Carolina Endangered Species Act (N.C.G.S. Sect. 113 article 25), and the North Carolina Plant Protection and Conservation Act of 1979 (N.C.G.S. Sect. 19b 106: 202.12-22). 2.0 METHODOLOGY The protected species surveys and habitat assessment was conducted on January 3, 2024, by ClearWater, an EnviroScience Company (ClearWater). Site visits have previously been performed on June 17, 2019, February 10, 2020, and March 11, 2020 to survey for element occurrences and identify potential suitable habitat. An official species list was obtained through the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information and Planning and Consultation (IPaC) on January 3, 2024. This list provides data concerning the presence or potential occurrence of federally threatened or endangered species in the defined project boundary. The USFWS lists five (5) threatened and endangered species as occurring or potentially occurring in the Evoke at Indian Trail project boundary (Table 1). Table 1. USFWS IPaC Official Species List. Common Name Scientific Name Status Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Threatened Carolina Heelsplitter Lasmigona decorata Endangered Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii Endangered Tricolored bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed Endangered' Proposed endangered by USFWS on September 13, 2022. A database search from the NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) dated January 3, 2024, provided existing data concerning the presence or potential occurrences of federal and state listed species in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina within a one -mile radius of the site (Appendix A). The NHP indicates no elemental occurrences of threatened or endangered species within a one -mile radius of the project boundary. During pedestrian field surveys conducted by ClearWater biologists, site habitats were identified and compared with recognized habitats for the five federally protected species Clearwater, an EnviroScience Company Page 2 Project #18859 — Evoke at Indian Trail Project potentially occurring on the site. Potential flora were identified to the taxonomic unit level necessary to determine if the observed specimen was a protected species. 3.0 HABITAT CLASSIFICATION During our site visit, ClearWater biologists identified five (5) habitats within the project site: stream, mixed forest, disturbed field, wetland, and open water (Figure 4). A general overview of the site and descriptions of each habitat type are included below. There are several dilapidated buildings located within the project area. These buildings were observed near the center of the property on either side of Rosetta Dr., primarily within the disturbed field habitat. These structures may provide summer habitat for protected bat species. 3.1 Stream One unnamed perennial stream runs along the eastern property boundary. The stream is an unnamed tributary to South Form Crooked Creek, a class C water that drains to Crooked Creek in the Yadkin Pee -Dee River basin. The stream is low gradient„ approximately two to four feet wide, and the substrate is primarily fine- grained sandy muck. This stream is bordered by the mixed forest habitat and was observed as low gradient. Debris and other high amounts of sediment were observed in the channel, which appears to be heavily influenced by stormwater events. 3.2 Wetland The wetlands observed on site vary in composition and size, with several linear wetlands located along the northeastern side of the project area and a larger wetland located near the southern boundary. The wetlands along the southern boundary were densely forested with non-native invasive species in comparison to the wetlands near the northern boundary. Species observed in the tree layer include swamp white oak (Quercus bicolor), sweet gum (Luiquidambar styraciflua), and black willow (Salix nigra). Species observed in the shrub layer include sweet gum, inkberry (Ilex glabra), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), water oak (Quercus nigra), and privet (Ligustrum sinense). Species observed in the herbaceous layer include soft rush (Juncus effusus), sedges (Carex spp.), curlydock (Rumex crispus), Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vinimeum), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), blackberry (Rubus sp.), swamp aster (Symphyotrichum puniceum), greenbrier (Smilax sp.), dwarf St. John's wort (Hypericum mutilum), and sweet wood reed (Cinna arundinaceae). 3.3 Mixed Forest This habitat type was observed as dominant throughout the site. The forest composition in the southern portion of the site had a relatively sparse understory, comprised of early successional species, and dense non-native invasive species. In contrast, moving towards the northern boundary, the forest composition was Clearwater, an EnviroScience Company Page 3 Project #18859 — Evoke at Indian Trail Project more diverse and appeared to be more mature than the early successional species observed further south on the site. Species observed in the tree layer include white ash (Fraxinus americana), Virginia pine (Pinus virginiana), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), shagbark hickory (Carya ovata), American elm (Ulmus americana), red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), southern red oak (Quercus falcata), bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa), red maple (Acer rubrum), water oak, sweet gum, and swamp white oak. Species observed in the shrub layer include multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), Japanese holly (Ilex crenata), blueberry (Vaccinium sp.), strawberry bush (Euonymus americanus), inkberry, white ash, blackberry, shagbark hickory, and privet. Species observed in the herbaceous layer include grape fern (Sceptridium sp.), spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron), fescue (Festuca sp.), golden ragwort (Packers aurea), cranefly orchid (Tipularia discolor), frost aster (Symphyotrichum pilosum), wild garlic (Allium canadense), Japanese honeysuckle, and greenbrier. Vining species observed include wild grape (Vitis sp.) and greenbrier. 3.4 Disturbed Field This habitat was found throughout a large portion of the property and ranged from recently mowed/maintained, particularly towards the northeastern corner and surrounding the open water in the southernmost corner, to unmaintained across the center of the property. Tree species are absent throughout this habitat, and the shrub layer is dominated by blackberry, multiflora rose, and privet. Species observed as dominant in the herbaceous layer include goldenrod species (Solidago spp.) and dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium). Additional species observed in the herbaceous layer include Japanese honeysuckle, false strawberry (Potentilla indica), pokeweed (Phytolacca americana), seedbox (Ludwegia alternifolia), Chinese silvergrass (Miscanthus sinensis), crabgrass (Digitaria sp.), clover (Trifolium repens), American fireweed (Erechtites hieraciifolius), chickweed (Stellaria sp.), dandelion (Taraxacum officinale), creeping Charlie (Glechoma hederacea), narrow -leaved plantain (Plantago lanceolata), and Carolina geranium (Geranium carolinianum). 3.5 Open Water This habitat type was located near both the southernmost and northernmost corners of the site. The pond in the southern portion of the site was larger and appeared to be maintained. The northernmost pond was surrounded by both mixed forest and wetland tree species including water oak, swamp white oak, red maple, and black willow. In contrast, species observed bordering the southernmost pond included soft rush and other sedges. Clearwater, an EnviroScience Company Page 4 Project #18859 — Evoke at Indian Trail Project 3.6 Soils Soils mapped by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Union County Soil Survey are listed in Table 2 and shown in Figure 5 (NRCS 2021). Table 2. USDA Soil Units occurring within the project boundary. Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name BuB Badin- Urban land complex, 2-8% slopes CmB Cid channery silt loam, 1-5% slopes CnB Cid-Urban land complex, 1-5% sopes 4.0 PROTECTED SPECIES The following is a brief description of each federally listed species included in the IPaC survey, its recognized habitat, and comments regarding survey results for that species. 4.1 Atlantic Pigtoe The Atlantic pigtoe (Pleurobema cordatum) is a freshwater mussel species native to the eastern United States. These bivalves are characterized by their somewhat triangular and inflated shells, which typically range from yellowish -brown to dark brown in color. The species is primarily found in rivers and streams within the Atlantic Slope drainage, encompassing regions from North Carolina to Florida. The Atlantic pigtoe plays a crucial role in maintaining the ecological balance of its habitat by filtering and purifying water. As filter feeders, these mussels extract algae, bacteria, and other organic particles from the water, contributing to improved water quality. The Atlantic pigtoe thrives in clean and well -oxygenated freshwater habitats with stable substrates such as sand, gravel, or mud. These mussels prefer areas with slow to moderate water currents, as excessive turbulence can disrupt their ability to anchor themselves to the riverbed. Potentially suitable habitat for the Atlantic Pigtoe was not observed on site. The streambed of the unnamed tributary was comprised of fine-grained, thick mucky substrate with debris and trash scattered throughout. It is the opinion of ClearWater that the proposed project is not likely to effect the Atlantic Pigtoe. 4.2 Carolina Heelsplitter The Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata) was first described in 1852. It has an ovate, trapezoid - shaped shell. The outer surface of the shell varies from greenish brown to dark brown in color, and shells from younger specimens have faint greenish brown or black rays. The nacre (inside surface) is often pearly white to bluish white, grading to orange in the deepest part of the shell. However, in older specimens the entire nacre may be a mottled pale orange. known specimen of the species measures 4.6 inches in length. The shell of the largest Clearwater, an EnviroScience Company Page 5 Project #18859 — Evoke at Indian Trail Project The Carolina Heelsplitter requires cool, clean, well -oxygenated water. Stable, silt - free stream bottoms appear to be critical to the species. Typically, stable areas occur where the stream banks are well -vegetated with trees and shrubs. Potentially suitable habitat for the Carolina Heelsplitter was not observed on site. The unnamed tributary was observed with sediment, debris, and slow moving currents. It is the opinion of ClearWater that the proposed project is not likely to effect the Carolina Heelsplitter. 4.3 Michaux's Sumac Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) is a rhizomatous, densely hairy shrub, with erect stems from 1 - 3 feet (ft) (30.5 — 91 centimeters, cm) in height. The compound leaves contain evenly serrated, oblong to lanceolate, acuminate leaflets. Most plants are unisexual; however, more recent observations have revealed plants with both male and female flowers on one plant. The flowers are small, borne in a terminal, erect, dense cluster, and colored greenish yellow to white. Flowering usually occurs from June to July; produced through the months of August to October. while the fruit, a red drupe, is Michaux's sumac grows in sandy or rocky open woods in association with basic soils. Apparently, this plant survives best in areas where some form of disturbance has provided an open area. Several populations in North Carolina are on highway rights -of way, roadsides, or on the edges of artificially maintained clearings. Two other populations are in areas with periodic fires, and two populations exist on sites undergoing natural succession. Potentially suitable habitat for Michaux's Sumac was not observed on site. The soils observed on the site contain high amounts of silt, clay, and loam. No species in the genus Rhus were found on -site. Therefore, it is the opinion of ClearWater that the proposed project is not likely to effect Michaux's sumac. 4.4 Schweinitz's Sunflower Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) is a perennial that regularly grows approximately 6.5 feet (2.0 meters) tall (though it can be shorter if young or injured) and can occasionally reach heights of 16 feet (4.8 meters). The stem is purplish in color, and the upper third bears secondary branches at 45-degree angles. The leaves are arranged in pairs on the lower part of the stem but usually occur singly (or alternate) on the upper parts. Leaves are attached to the stem at right angles, and the tips of the leaves tend to droop. The leaves are thick and stiff, with a rough upper surface. The upper leaf surfaces have broad spiny hairs that are directed toward the tip and soft white hairs cover the underside. The plant produces small Clearwater, an EnviroScience Company Page 6 Project #18859 — Evoke at Indian Trail Project yellow flowers from late August until frost. This species is able to colonize through the dispersal of seeds that readily germinate without a dormant period. Schweinitz's sunflower occurs in full to partial sun and is found in areas with poor soils, such as thin clays that vary from wet to dry. It is believed that this species once occurred in natural forest openings or grasslands. The species is also found along roadside rights -of -way, maintained power lines and other utility rights -of - way, edges of thickets and old pastures, clearings and edges of upland oak -pine - hickory woods and Piedmont longleaf pine forests, and other sunny or semi -sunny habitats where disturbances (e.g., mowing, clearing, grazing, blow downs, storms, frequent fire) help create open or partially open areas for sunlight. Potentially suitable habitat for the Schweinitz's sunflower was observed along the edges of the forested area towards the center of the project site and within the disturbed field habitat. The forested edges had moderate herbaceous cover, minimal competition from woody tree species, experience full to partially full sun, and are underlain with poor, clay soil series. Given the potentially suitable habitat at the site, it is the opinion of ClearWater that a survey for Schweinitz's sunflower be conducted during the species optimal survey window (late -August through October) to confirm the absence or presence of this species within the project site. A biological determination cannot be made until a survey is conducted during the designated survey window. 4.5 Tricolored Bat Tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus) is a small -sized bat that averages 3 to 3.5 inches in length with an average wingspan of approximately 9 inches. The fur color varies from yellow to brown to black, with younger individuals generally having darker coloration. The key characteristic, as the name suggests, is their tricolored back, which is a gradient from dark near the tail, light in the middle, and dark near the head. The tricolored bat is found across the eastern half of North America. In winter months, this species hibernates in humid caves. Specifically in the southeastern U.S., they have also been found hibernating in road culverts and occasionally in tree cavities. In the spring, summer, and fall, when this species is not hibernating, they can be found in open forests, forest edges, and occasionally in crevices of old buildings. Their diet is composed almost exclusively of flying insects, typically foraged from open fields and waterways along forested areas. This species is currently listed as proposed endangered by the USFWS as of September 13, 2022. As of November 10th, 2023, no formal federal management guidelines for protecting this species and its associated habitat have been released from USFWS. USFWS has 12 months after the closure of the public notice period (ended November 14, 2022) to determine the final listing status of this species. If this species becomes listed as threatened or endangered, federal management guidelines will be set in place to minimize adverse impacts. Clearwater, an EnviroScience Company Page 7 Project #18859 — Evoke at Indian Trail Project Potentially suitable summer habitat for this species was observed on site. The mixed forested habitat contains several snags and mature trees with loose bark. Until management guidelines from USFWS are published, it is anticipated that a tree clearing moratorium would be put into place from approximately April 1st through October 14th if the proposed endangered listing becomes effective. Tricolored bats are not known to inhabit decaying buildings, such as the ones found in the project area Conducting a bat survey near the start of the active summer season could confirm or deny the presence of this species on site. A negative presence/ absence survey result may be able to waive the tree clearing moratorium. ClearWater recommends that tree clearing be conducted during the bat's inactive season (October 15th to March 31st) to minimize potential impacts to this species. If seasonal tree clearing is conducted in winter months, it would be the opinion of ClearWater that this project may affect but is not likely to adversely affect the tricolored bat. During permit application review, the Corps of Engineers and the USFWS will determine if any tree cutting moratoriums are required. 5.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS During completion of threatened and endangered species habitat assessment for the Evoke at Indian Trail Project site, ClearWater biologists observed potentially suitable summer habitat for the tricolored bat and Schweintiz's sunflower. It is of the opinion of ClearWater that development of this site would not affect federally protected species listed as potentially occurring within the project boundary, with the potential exception of the tricolored bat and Schweintiz's sunflower. ClearWater recommends a survey for Schweintiz's sunflower during the USFWS designated survey window (late -August through October) to determine if Schweintiz's sunflower is present on site and what the potential effects of development may be. Until a survey is conducted in the designated window, a biological determination cannot be made. As of December 2023, no formal federal management guidelines for protecting the tricolored bat and its associated habitat have been released from USFWS. Until management guidelines from USFWS are published, it is anticipated that a tree clearing moratorium would be put into place from approximately April 1st through October 14th if the proposed endangered listing becomes effective. Any updates to the proposed listing of the tricolored bat will also be provided by ClearWater if those updates occur prior to commencement of this project. Because of the transitory nature of some of the listed threatened and endangered species and the particular flower/fruiting periods of some plants; it is possible that endangered species populations and locations may change over time. Therefore, any potential findings at a later date should be fully investigated and coordinated with appropriate agencies to prevent potential adverse impacts. Clearwater, an EnviroScience Company Page 8 Project #18859 — Evoke at Indian Trail Project 6.0 REFERENCES Center for Biological Diversity. 2023. Natural History: Tricolored Bat. https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/species/mammals/tricolored bat/natural histor y html. Accessed January 2024. Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources. 2023. Tricolored Bat. hftps:Hfw.ky.gov/WiIdlife/Pages/Tricolored- Bat. aspx#: —:text=Description%3A%20One%20of%20Kentucky's%20two,of%20iu st%20over%209%20inches. Accessed January 2024. NCNHP (North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Database). 2023. https:Hncnhde.natureserve.orq/; Accessed January 2024. NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2023. Web Soil Survey for Union County. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx; Accessed December 2023. Schweinitz's Sunflower— South Carolina Wildlife Federation. (n.d.). South Carolina Wildlife Federation. https://www.scwf.org/schweinitzs-sunflower; Accessed January 2024. USFWS. 2023. Optimal Survey Windows for North Carolina's Federally Threatened, Endangered, and At Risk Plants. https://www.fws.gov/story/2022-03/north- carolinas-federally-threatened-endangered-and-risk-plant-species; Accessed January 2024. USFWS. 2023. Atlantic Pigtoe. Environmental Conservation Online System. https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164; Accessed January 2024. USFWS. 2023. Carolina Heelsplitter. Environmental Conservation Online System. https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3534; Accessed January 2024. USFWS. 2023. Michaux's Sumac. Environmental Conservation Online System. https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217; Accessed January 2024. USFWS. 2023. Schweinitz's Sunflower. Environmental Conservation Online System. https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849; Accessed January 2024. USFWS. 2023. Tricolored bat. Environmental Conservation Online System. https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515. Accessed January 2024. USFWS Information, Planning, and Consultation System. 2023. https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/; Accessed January 2024. Clearwater, an EnviroScience Company Page 9 Project #18859 — Evoke at Indian Trail Project Figures Morris Park o a s Boyce 0�' Country Woods ark / A3� ldlewood Acres Reigate Forest Homes / Windrow / / Estates I Wo' d'Hollow / Settlers Matthews / Landing / / Club View Acres / 0 Vance Off' Hemby Bridge / Southminister / Woods ce -Stallings )n FA Project Boundary rygton=Rd— Vicinity Map Figure 1 Indian Trail Project Boundary `. Weddington Wesley Chapel Indian Trail 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles (+/- 28 Ac) i Union County, NC. I 0 0.250.5 1 Kilometers M N A [LearWaEer Q An EnY1r08CIenC2 Company EP Date: 1/924 Project #: 18859 NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane North Carolina RIPS 3200 F .•j�dian Trail it •'��'7• r� y - -- � ` � ass � . (2350 off R f � • r —� J ��� ��' • J r Isis 1 O° +:?r S to ;o ,•' Project Boundary!- J Sop VA Y •� ,Su4station b s -----, Project Boundary �-- -:y,.�•�.,`�. /�h�� �---i \ rpm ,y - 1�' USGS Topographic Map Indian Trail i 500 1,000 2, 0 Feet N 1:24K Scale Quad: Matthews (+/- 28 Ac) r Aaear� f aLer Figure 2 Union County, NC. o ,00 zoo 400 600 Meters An En vir oSc i en ce Company [�— ior : EP Date: 1/924 Project #: 18859 NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane North Carolina RIPS 3200 Ft U Author: EP Date: 1/924 Project #: 18859 NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Ft US Author: EP Date: 1/924 Project #: 18859 NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Ft US Author: EP Date: 1/924 Project #: 18859 NAD 1983 2011 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Ft US Appendix A: US Fish and Wildlife Service IPaC - Official Species List and NC Natural Heritage Program Data United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Asheville Ecological Services Field Office 160 Zillicoa Street Asheville, NC 28801-1082 Phone: (828) 258-3939 Fax: (828) 258-5330 In Reply Refer To: Project Code: 2024-0000734 Project Name: Indian Trail Subject: List of threatened and endangered species location or may be affected by your propy To Whom It May Concern: The enclosed species list identifies threa well as proposed and final designated cri proposed project and/or may be affected requirements of the U.S. Fish and W' Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1 , 6(/ January 03, 2024 in your proposed project LWnpropoAsed,candidate species, as t may oe boundary of your proposed projes list fulfills the hp(Service)�er sectia7(c) of the New information based on updated s9NIQhchanges species, changed habitat convons, or of factors contact us if you need morSilLrent information or federally proposed, listed4JK341Q&date species habitat. Please note tha�pder 50 402.12( f t Act, the accuracy of completed formally list should be A i as desired. The icT and distribution of Es list. Please feel free to ding the potential impacts to ,nated and proposed critical implementing section 7 of the 3. This verification can be recommends that verification be completed by vi ' g-Me- JdfflWebsite at regular intervals during project planning and implementatio r rat&ro species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through IPa pleJ&g the same process used to receive the enclosed list. The purp of thO�s to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosys which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act an its im nting regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat. A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological 01/03/2024 evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12. 10 If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or bio gic 1 evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the prowsed IbLct, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402,AWddition',lWe Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed Arical habi at be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and pr ures for�section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, c be e "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: htt s://www.fws. ov/site fa files documents/ endan ered-species-consultation-handbook.pdf 4F e Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to proteithreatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and lden agle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project -related impacts. tentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds, including eal Is, is pr ited unless otherwise permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec.. 10.12 16 U.S. ec. 668(a)). For more information regarding these Acts, see Mi ra Bird Permit What W oI U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (fws.gov). The MBTA has no provision for allowin4tkfmi e ogratory birds that mNybunintentionally killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. I the resp ity off tie project proponent to comply with these Acts by identify4ng potential impacts tognigr Ids and eagles within applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or ird/ agle Conservation Plan (when there is no federal nex Propone# should' ervation measures to avoid or minimize the production roject-related stressors o imize the exposure of birds and their resources to the projt d stressors. F^Ws. o tion on avian stressors and recommended conservatio mea see htt sov/librar /collections/threats-birds. In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Or 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal age es that engage in or authorize activities that might affec gratos, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures that will impr bi,Ld po ations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both migratory N ory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of Executiv der lease visit https://www.fws. ov/partner/council-conservation- mi rato s. We appreciate concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office. Attachment(s): • Official Species List 01/03/2024 3 OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior i mation whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the a proposed action". This species list is provided by: Asheville Ecological Services Field Office 160 Zillicoa Street Asheville, NC 28801-1082 (828) 258-3939 . O. 01/03/2024 ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish list because a project could affect downstream species. IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on bS Department of Commerce. See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. P� if you have questions. 1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National!! office of the National Oceanic and Atmospteric 1 Commerce. MAMMALS NAME Alr— Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavu No critical habitat has been designated cies. Species profile: htt s://ecos.fws. ov/ec /s 10515 CLAMS NAME ct and could include appear on the species diet' of NOAA and the 'holly or partially designated FWS office Ties Service (NMFS), is an ation within the Department of Mk STATUS Cv 4cv Proposed Endangered STATUS Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masons Threatened There is final critical habitat for this species. Your locati overlap the critical habitat. Species profile: h t s://ecos.6s. ov/ec /s ecies/5164 Carolina Heels ter SAfna decorata Endangered There is fi ti abi or this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat. Species p�f' :// fws.gov/ecp/species/3534 INSE-W57N NAME STATUS Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743 01/03/2024 FLOWERING PLANTS NAME Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217 Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849 CRITICAL HABITATS THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT JURISDICTION. YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR ABOVE LISTED SPECIES. STATUS *4Endangered 4 dangered Q� OFFICE'S EFFECTS ON ALL Roy Cooper, Governor ■■■■ INC DEPARTMENT OF ■■c;■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES ■ ■■ January 3, 2024 clement Riddle ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. 145 7th ave West, Suite B hendersonville, NC 44224 RE: Indian Trail; 18859 Dear clement Riddle: D. Reid Wilson, Secretary Musty Buchanan Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program IR \��NiU�1WZEAEAW The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above. Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our records. The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report. If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here: httos://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37. Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission. The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally - listed species are documented near the project area. If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please contact the NCNHP at natural.heritage�dncr.nc.gov. Sincerely, NC Natural Heritage Program DEPAR7MEN7 OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES 121 W. JOr4ES STREET. RALEIGH_ NEC 27603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE C£NT£R. PALEiGH, rFC 27699 OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX 919.707.9121 � \ CO ? \ ƒ ■ / CO CO Z u O \ E / CO / \ t\ C °CC) u / \ \ E ± u \(® E \ / e 4 u 3 O \ \ / / \ > \ \ \ 4 ^ $ © \ \ \ / \ \ � 9 \ \ 2 E \/ _ ? _ / E \ ° \ s 4 \ \ e LE e M 2 5 y z / e .z \ E \ 2 ` / \ Z /.0 \ / t a y u e t E» - \ // / / 0 o e a %� \/ 3 CC) 3 CC) \ t t \\ CC) CC) \ \ / / z E } / ° / //\=\ / \ \ \ \ ƒ \ \ \\ \ƒ 3= \( tt :: ee \§ EE �: \\\ �\ \ \ \ / � \\0 �\ O C .\ 3\ \/ {\ /a \ / �\ j \ — - / / / 2 c u © \ 0 �» �� ± // �z \ / U 0\\ / /. 2 / jf m % a 5 3} C \ƒ } » 2{ c E 3G CC) } 2 O (2 \ CC) \\ \ LE m \/ t \ u : E \ \{ u t = u 2 \ / E n \ /» § = m O s © § e 0E%/ (\ \ O \ / cc)= / \ \ ± ±z A ° z z CC)\ \ \ / \ \ z o CC) CC) �.» - x x / Z / \ \ § \ c .� � c m_ � c c1r) Nt � � N W ❑ 2 z Q) z s _ \ c Appendix B: Photolog ¢ I- Q1 �1.1:47:01 "Of r � Q b.645358 Y �? s -11TSE de:652.9f# L',hoto 1. View of unnamed tributary to South Form Crooked Creek, a class C w :o Crooked Creek in the Yadkin Pee -Dee River basin. a'.• � � .� na � '.a k i Q k jai �„ � \ 1' "E n f �yy i Yid: 1ppk k `�I 1 ��v�YY�iiF� g► @ �, VIP itg 3a�S- rt, i ec i A ����� a 1 3 C J ac 1�. a e' �ai._ w \ may.. ... .i Photo 5. View of open water habitat located towards the northern boundary. Photo 6. View of open water habitat located towards the southern boundary. Photo 7. Typical view of wetland habitat located towards the southernmost boundary facing northeast. Photo 8. Typical view of linear wetland near the center of the site. Photo 9. Typical view of wetland habitat near the northern portion of the site. Attachment E NC Division of Mitigation Services Receipt ROY COOPER Governor ELIZABETH S. BISER Secretary MARC RECKTENWALD Director Scott Bayer Multifamily USA 215 N. Pine Street Charlotte, NC 28202 Project: Evoke Indian Trail County: Union 401 permit#: 2020-0548 404 permit#: 2019-01147 DMS ID#: MR-07499 Amount Paid: $18,209.36 Check Number: 5070 qs 51Ni a NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quality RECEIPT March 28, 2022 The NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) has received a check as indicated above as payment for the compensatory mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification/Section 404 Permit(s) issued for the above -referenced project. This receipt serves as notification that your compensatory mitigation requirements assigned to DMS associated with the authorized activity as specified below have been satisfied. You must also comply with all other conditions of this certification and any other state, federal or local government permits or authorization associated with this activity including G.S. § 143-214.11. The DMS, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the Division is responsible for the compensatory mitigation requirements indicated below associated with the project permit and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as specified in the permit. Mitigation responsibility assigned to the DMS is nontransferable. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010. Mitigation Location Mitigation Type Credits Yadkin 03040105 Riparian Wetland 0.27 Refunds of payments made to NCDMS are only approved under certain conditions. All refund requests must be submitted in accordance with the Division's refund policy. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly.Williams@ncdenr.gov. Sincerely, Kelly Williams ILF Program Coordinator cc: Todd Tugwell, USACE - Raleigh; Bryan Roden -Reynolds, USACE Clement Riddle, agent North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services D_ E Q'217 West Jones Street 1 1652 Mall Service Center I Rateigh. North Carolina 27699 1652 NCRiI ClWIII MA 9w.707.8976