NC0003425_Historical_1996

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
,Healand Natural Resources
of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
November 13, 1996
Ms. Joanie P. Cooke
Carolina Power & Light Company
3932 New Hill -Holleman Road
New Hill, North Carolina, 27562
MT 2 . ,LI �r..
[D FE
Subject: Additional Information Request
Permit No. NC0003425
CP&L Roxboro S. E. Power Plant
Person County
Dear Ms. Cook:
On November 6, 1996, the Division of Water Quality received a renewal application
package for NPDES permit NC0003425. A preliminary review has been performed. To complete
this review, additional information is required concerning the following issues:
In reference to the request to delete stormwater monitoring at SW-1 and SW-4:
Please supply information documenting the operations performed and the
materials/products stored in and around the warehouse. Does this location
present the danger of contaminated runoff (i.e., potential for leaks at warehouse
unloading/loading or from storage of materials outside of the warehouse
structure)?
Please supply information documenting the operations performed and the
materiaWproducts stored at the outside storage location. Does this location
present the danger of contaminated runoff?
In reference to combining stormwater monitoring for SW-8. 10, 11, and 12:
• Please confirm the location of SW-8. This location was not identified on the
facility layout drawing included as Enclosure 3.
In reference to deleting the monitoring requirement for SW-2 and SW-6 to SW-17:
• Please identify the location of outfall 003 and describe the exact location where
samples are collected (both for outfall 003 and for stormwater samples).
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Rcqucst for Additional Information
NPDES No. NC0003425
Page 2 of 2
In reference to eliminating stormwater dischar eg SW-3:
• Please outline the construction schedule for completing this task.
In reference to SW-5 on Enclosure 3:
• Is the facility still planning to continue stormwater monitoring at SW-5? Please
supply information documenting the operations performed and the
materials/products stored at the outside storage location. Does this location
present the danger of contaminated runoff?
In reference to Outfalls 002 and 005 identified on Attachment 3:
Please identify the exact location of these two outfalls on the facility layout
drawing included as Enclosure 3.
Why does unit 4 cooling water have a separate discharge (outfall 005) while
units 1, 2, and 3 discharge directly into the onsite discharge canal?
From my understanding, outfalls 003 and 006 are the only two permitted
discharge points at this facility. Is monitoring performed at outfall 002 and
005?
Please give me a call (919-733-5083, extension 597) at your earliest convenience to
schedule a meeting to go over this additional information request and to discuss. the CP&L
Weatherspoon facility. I look forward to meeting you. Have a great day!!
0ee
4EI.
®M ra, T.
Environmental Engineer
NPDES Permits Group
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Permits and Engineering Unit / Jeff Myhra
pENNR` RI\-E��H

c
a ,
State of Noi h Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
November 4, 1996
Mr. John J. Carney
Manager - Roxboro Plant
Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Electric Generating Plant
Post Office Box 1238
Roxboro, North Carolina 27573
air
A�It�
[D FE Fit
Subject: NPDES Permit Renewal
Permit No. NC0003425
CP&L Roxboro S. E. Power Plant
Person County
Dear Mr. Carney:
The Division of Water Quality acknowledges receipt of the following information:
• EPA forms 1 and 2C (in triplicate).
• $400.00 processing fee (check number 37299).
I am, by copy of this letter, requesting that our Regional Office Supervisor prepare a staff report
and recommendations regarding this discharge. You will be advised of any comments,
recommendations, questions, or other information necessary to complete the application review.
Should you have any questions regarding this application, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone], extension 597.
Scer
of T. Myhra, .I.T.
Environmental Engineer
NPDES Permits Group
cc: Raleigh Regional Office
Permits and Engineering Unit / Jeff Myhra
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

I(/CGGG 3qI S
Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Electric Generating Plant
PC Box 1238
Roxboro NC 27573
Mr. A. Preston Howard, Jr., Director
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
512 N. Salisbury Street
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-05354
4-eW11gJ
, 0CJ•©L
John J. Carney
Plant Manager
Subject: Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. NC0003425
The current NPDES permit for Carolina Power & Light Company's (CP&L) Roxboro Steam Electric
Plant located in Person County expires on April 30, 1997. CP&L hereby requests that the NPDES
permit for the facility be renewed. The Roxboro Steam Electric Plant is expected to continue to
operate over the next five years as it has previously, and no major changes are expected that might
affect the discharges from the plant that are identified in this application.
Enclosed are EPA Forms 1 and 2C (in triplicate) and a check for a $400.00 application fee
(Enclosure 1). Also, enclosed are copies of the stormwater correspondence for the facility (w/o
enclosures), previously submitted as part of CP&L's Stormwater Group Application No. 286
(Enclosure 2). In addition, a site stormwater drainage map and the respective descriptions are
included (Enclosure 3) as part of this submittal.
CP&L hereby requests that sampling not be required for stormwater discharge points SWI and
SW4, as identified on the site drainage map (Enclosure 3), since the discharges are not from areas
associated with industrial activities. Also, CP&L requests that stormwater discharge points, SW8,
SW10, SWI1, and SW12, as identified on the site drainage map be classified as substantially
identical stormwater outfalls resulting from substantially identical industrial activities. Each of
the stormwater outfalls ( SW8, SW10, SW11, and SW12,) is representative of the others and any
quantitative data would apply to all of the referenced stormwater outfalls. In addition, the final
discharge point for stormwater discharges SW2, and SW6 thru SW17, as identified on the site
drainage map will be Outfall 003, consisting of once through cooling and non -contact service, as
authorized in NPDES Permit Number NC0003425. Therefore, all flow from the referenced
stormwater outfalls will be co -mingled with the effluent from Outfall 003 prior to discharge to
surface waters. Since any flow from the stormwater outfalls would contribute a relatively small
ZI
v
W
Hwy 57 North Tel [phone] Fax [phone]

Mr. A. Preston Howard, Jr. 2 OCT 2 8 1996
amount to the final volume of Outfall 003, CP&L believes that the stormwater contribution would
have an imperceptible impact on the discharge at Outfall 003. Consequently, CP&L requests that
sampling not be required for stormwater discharge points SW2, and SW6 thru SW 17.
Currently stormwater discharge point SW3 discharges into Hyco Reservoir. Plans are to
permanently modify the drainage catch basin and to regrade the drainage area so the stormwater
flow from the area only discharges into the facility's discharge canal (Outfall 003). After
completion of the proposed modification, CP&L believes that the stormwater contribution would
have an imperceptible impact on the discharge at Outfall 003. Consequently, CP&L requests that
sampling not be required for stormwater discharge point SW3 upon completion of the proposed
modification.
CP&L appreciates the continued cooperation demonstrated by the NCDWQ staff in responding to
its permitting needs. If you have any questions or comments regarding this information, please
contact Ms. Joanie Cooke at [phone].
Yours very truly,
John J. Carney
Manager - Roxboro Plant
c: Mr. Dave Goodrich (NCDWQ - Permits and Engineering Unit)

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discbarge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Enclosure 1
EPA Forms 1 and 2C and Application Fee
U: \joanie\permit\enc 1. rox

`CP�cL
Vendor mm-,6w
CRIG7942
Voucher no.
809038
Carolina & Light Company
Raleigh NC ruO2
Remittance Advice

Please orini or type in the unshaded areas only
(till -in areas are sowed for elite type, i.e., 126 Inlnch).
f - -- • )proved OMB No. 2040-0086 Approval expires 7-31-88
FORM
I NVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
I. EPA I.D. NUMBER
GENERAL INFORMATION
..EPA Consolicbted Pomrit Program
F N C 0 0 0 3 4 2 5 p
GENERAL
(Read the "Generol Instruction."
before starti..a.)
.
,
LAZZLITIi
G CMCRAL INSTRUCTIONS
1. EPA I.D. UMBER
If a preprinted label has been provided, affix
it in the designated {pace. Review the inform-
ation carefully; if any of it is incorrect, Orion
It. KAC L TY
through it and enter the correct data in the
appropriate fill—in arse below. Also, if any of
the preprinted data is absent Ithe area to the
V. ACI IT
IN w DREW
left of the label some /lets, Me information
MAI IS ASE ISLA B IN S A that should appear), please provide it in the
proper fill—in araefs) below. If the label is
complete and correct, you need not Complete
Items 1, III, V, and VI (except V1•8 which
must be completed regardless). Complete all
VI FA ILI
Items If rip label has been provided. Refer to
LOCATIO
the Instructions for detailed from descrip-
tions and for the legal authorizations under
which this date is collected.
II. POLLUTANT CHARACTERISTICS
INSTRUCTIONS: Complete A through J to determine whether you need to
submit any permit application forms to the EPA. If you answer "yet" to any
questions, you mutt submit this form and the supplemental form listed in the parenthesis following the question. Mark "X" in the box in the third column
if the supplemental form is attached. If you answer "no" to each question, you
need not submit any of than forms. You may answer "no" if your activity
is excluded from permit requirements; see Section C of the instructions. See also, Section D of the instructions for definitions of bold—faced terms.
SPECIFIC QUESTIONS
•s.
no'
SPECIFIC QUESTIONS
"o
• Po"r
A. Is this facility a publicly owned Imilment works
B. Does or will this facility Ielther existing or proposed)
which results In a discharge to waters of the U.&7
Include a rolearltratsd MIOW feeding operation or,
(FORM 2A)
aquatic animal production facility which results in a
1
d6ehsrq to Waters of the U.S.? (FORM 2B)
C. Is this s facility which currently results in
Is this a pro I Fry (other an Mom, rm
to swtm of top U.S. other than those described in
X
in or oboes/ which will mutt in a dYehrga to
X
A or B above? F RM 2
Weaof the U 7 (FORM 2 1
n
r,
E. Does or will this facility Crest, gore, or dispose of
F. Do you or will you inject at this facility industrial or
huw&us wastes? (FORM 3)
X
municipal effluent below the lowermost stratum con-
X
mining, within ons quarter mile of the wall bore,
underground sources of drinking water? (FORM 4)
G. o you or wI you m)eot et t Is ace Ity any produced
water or other fluids which are brought to the surfaceEl
H. Do you or will you inject at this facility flukis for spe-
in connection with conventional oil or natural gas pro-cial
processes Such a mining of Sulfur by top FriesenX
duction, inject fluids used for enhanced recovery ofprow,
solution mining of minerals, in situ mmsbus•oil
or natural gas, or inject fluids for gore" of liquidtion
of foRil fuel, or recovery of geothertMl energy?
droorbons? (FORM41
(FORM 4)
fmI itY8pr0 stationary aOYrp w IC I{{
Is 1 ity a RXRR isone
of the 28 industrial categories lined in the in.NOT
one of the 28 industrial categories listed in topgructions
and which will potentially emit 100 tonsinstructions
and which will potentially emit 250 tom
X
per year of any air pollutant regulated under thepar
year of any sir pollutant regulated under the Clean
Clean Air Act and may affect or be looted in anAir
Act and may affect or be looted in an againattainment
am? (FORM 51
one? (FORM 5)
Ill. NAME OF FAC;ILITYKIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
i sNsP R 0 X B 0 R 0 S T E A M E
L E
C
T R I
C P L A N T
IV. FACILITY CONTACT
A. NAME S TITLE (last, tint, S title)
S. PNONE (nreo code a no.)
c
2JOHN J. C A R N E Y
910 599 11 7 4
V. FACILITY MAILING ADDRESS
.. .1 ..
A. STREET OR P.O. SOX
3 P 0 B O X 1 2 3 8
a• CITY OR TOWN
e.
C.STAT D. *IF COOK
4 R O X B O R 0
N C 2 7 5 7 3
Vt. FACILITY LOCATION
A. STREET, ROUTE NO. OR OTNCR SPECIFIC IDENTIFIER
c
b P E R S O N C O U N T Y R 0 A D 13 7 7
S. COUNTY NAME
P E R S O N
C. CITY OR TOWN
.STATE a. ZIP CODE F. COUNT
g R O X B 0 R O
N C
2 7 5 7 3
LTA FIN Nn MIO-1 (Rev. 10-80) CONTINUE ON REVERSE

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
VII. SIC CODES (0-digit, in order of priority)
A. FIRST W SECOND
(specify)
(specify) _
7
i 9 1 1
ELECTRIC POWER SERVICES 7
C. THIRD D. FOURTH
(specify) (specify)
7 7
VIII`OPERATOR INFORMATION
A. NAM[ B. Is the name listed In
hurl V II I -A elm the
oWIHr7
B
C A R 0 L I N A P 0 W E R 6 L I G H T C O M P A N Y ®YES O No
as
II
C. STATUS OF OPERATOR (Enter the appropriate sfeMe into tae aRMel aOSiy "Other". specify.)
D. PHONE (arga Code a no.)
F = FEDERAL M = PUBLIC (other than federal or Mfg)
fipedfy)
S- STATE O- OTHER dpeatfy/
P
A
1 9 1 01
5 9 9
1 1 7 4
P- PRIVATE
n
[. STREET OR I.O. BOX
P O B 0 X 1 5 5 1
F. CITY OR TOWN G.STAT H. ZIP Coo[ IX- INDIAN LAND
Is the facility looted on Indian lands?
B R A L E I G H N C 2 7 6 0 2 p YES ®No
ss
• r w u a - H
X. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS
A. NPOES (Discharses to Surruce Water) o. Pan (Air Emintons from Propowd SoulTo)
See Attachment 1 for list of
g ry g P existing environmental permits
U It N M
■.ulc(Underground Injection of Fluids) E. OTHER (Specify)
.
1
(specify)
U
9e
' M Ir
1
C. RCRA (Hasardow Wastes) E. OTHER (specify)
specify)
91RI 1 19
XI. MAP
Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending to at least one mile beyond property boundaries. The map must show
the outline of the facility, the location of each of its existing and proposed intake and discharge structures, each of its hazardous waste
treatment, storage, or disposal facilities, and each well where it injects fluids underground. Include all springs, rivers and other surface
water bodies in the map area. See instructions for precise requirements. See Attachment 2
XII. NATURE OF BUSINESS (provide a brief description
Electric Utility
This facility is a four unit electric generating plant using coal-fired boilers
to produce steam for turbine generators with a combined net dependable capacity
of 2462 MWe.
XII I. CERTIFICATION tens iRewcdoml
l Certify under penalty of law that l have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this application and all
attachments and that, based on my inquiry of those persons immadiata-ly responsible for obtaining the information contained in the
application, l believe that the information is true, accurate and coinp/ete. l sin aware that there are significant penalties for submitting
false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
A. NAME a OFFICIAL TITLE(type p,print) 3. SIGNA1IURE C. DATE SIGNED
John J. Carney - ManagerJ 0 2&-96
COMMENTS FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
C
EPA Form 3510-1 (Rev. 11180) Reverse
n U.S. Government Printing Office v 1985-a8b-t83/32991

y ; -PA I.D. NUMBER(COpy from Item I of Form 1/ OMB No 1040-008b
Pi.... �r�ot d, tune in'the unshaded areas only. NC0003425 Approval expires 73I 88
F
n/ORM
' "
NPDES
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTEL...�d AGENCY
EPAAPPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER
= EXISTING MANUFACTURING, COMMERCIAL, MINING AND SILVICULTURAL OPERATIONS
Consolidated Permits Program
I. OUTFALL LOCATION
For each curial 1, IISL the latitude and longitude of its location to the nearest 15 seconds and the name of the receiving Water.
A. UT ALL
NUMBER
list
B. LATITUDE
C. LONGITUDE
D. RECEIVING WATER (name)
oaa.
,. scc.
003
36
28
48
79
05
11
Hyco Reservoir
006
36
19
13
79
04
41
Hyco Reservoir
If. FLOWS, SOURCES OF POLLUTION, AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
A. Attach a line drawing showing the Water flow through the facility. Indicate sources of intake water, operations contributing Wastewater to the effluent,
and treatment units labeled to correspond to the more detailed descriptions in Item B. Construct a water balance on the line drawing by showing average
flows between intakes, operations, treatment units, and outfalis. If a seater balance cannot be determined fag., for carrein mining activities), provide a
pictorial description of the nature and amount of any sources of water and any collection or treatmem measures. See Attachment 3
B. For each outfall, provide a description of: (1) All operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, including process wastewater, sanitary wastewater,
cooling water, and storm water runoff; 12) The average flow Contributed by each operation; and (3) The treatment received by the wastewater. Continue
on additional sheets if necessary. See Attachment 4 for descri tion of wastewater sources
I. OUT-
Z. OPERATION(S) CONTRIBUTING FLOW
a. TREATMENT
FALLNG
(list)
a. OPERATION (lilt)
b. AVERAGE FLOW
(include units)
a. DESCRIPTION
. LIST CODES FROM
TABLE 2C-1
Once through and non -contact
1069 MGD
Evaporation, discharge to
1-F
4-A
cooling
surface
003
Ash Pond (including low
12 MGD
Neutralization, oxidation
2-K
2-B
volume wastes coal pile
sedimentation absorption
1-U
2-A
runoff, plant drainage
003
system, domestic waste,
oil/water separators,
Unit 4 cooling tower
blowdown, ash landfill
drainage, silo wash water,
ash transport system, and
stormwater)
Stormwater
Discharge to surface
4-A
003
Coal pile runoff
0.4 MGD
Sedimentation, neutralization
1-U
2-K
006
OFFICIAL USE ONLY (effluent guidelines sub -categories)

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
P
C. Except for storm runoff, leaks, or spills, are the discharges described in Items I I -A or B intern or seasonal? 1
YES (comPlcte the following table) NO (go to Section Ill)
3.FREQUENCY
Y-
4. FLOW
1. OU TFALL
2.
a.
b.
a. FLOW RATE
(in mgd)
b. TOTAL VOLUME
CONTRIBUTING FL
WEEAYS
R YEARNTHS
(specify with units)
c OUR-
(list)AXIMUM
(specify
I. A NG+•P
(in dosar
average)
erage)
average)
averagel
•vusasr
o•'+
• •R.Ge
wu.
Ill. PRODUCTION
A. Does an effluent
guideline limitation promulgated by EPA under
Section 304
of the Clean
Water Act apply
to your facility?
[IV
ES (complete Item III-B)
NO (to to
Section IV)
B. Are the limitations in the applicable effluent guideline expressed in terms of production (orothermessurc ofaperation)?
YES (complete Item III C) ® NO (go to Section IV)
C. If you answered "yes" to Item III-8, list the quantity which represents an actual measurement of your level of production, expressed in the terms and units
used in the applicable effluent guideline, and indicate the affected outfalls.
1. AVERAGE DAILY PRODUCTION
2. AFFECTED
b ua e. olew Anon. IROOV Nwnnw�, vc.
a. au•nn++ lea o•. s oI Nc•sves
OUTFALLS
(list outfoll numbers)
fsPecifY
(specify)
IV. IMPROVEMENTS
A. Are you now required by any Federal, State or local authority to meet any implementation schedule for the construction, upgrading or operation of waste.
water treatment equipment or practices or any other environmental programs which may affect the discharges described in this application? This includes,
but is not limited to, permit conditions, administrative or enforcement orders, enforcement compliance schedule letters, stipulations, court orders, and grant
or loan conditions. YES (complete the following table) No fir. to Item IV-B)
1. IDENTIFICATION OF CONDITION.
Z. AFFECTED OUTFALLS
A. FINAL COM
E DATE
AGREEMENT, ETC.
a. [RIFF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
a. MO.
b. .OV Aa.OI OI.CMaaOr<
ou. I. /{CTEO
l
8. OPTIONAL- You may attach additional sheets describing any additional water pollution control programs (or other environmental projects which may affect
your discharges) you now have underway or which you plan. Indicate whether each program is now underway or planned, and indicate your actual or
Planned schedules for construction. MARK "A" IF DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL CONTROL PROGRAMS Is ATTAINED
EPA Form 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85) PAGE 2 OF 4 CONTINUE ON PAGE 3

Form Approved
EPA LIMSER(eppy from Item I of Form I / OMB No. 2040-0086
FRnkpCrF7- __303425 Approvalexpnes 7-37-88
V. INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTIC
A, B, & C: See instructions before proceeding — Complete one set of tables for each outfall — Annotate the outfall number in the space provided.
NOTE: Tables V.A. V-S, and V-C are included on separate sheets numbered V-1 through V 9.
D. Use the space below to list any of the pollutants listed in Table 2c-3 of the instructions, which you know or have reason to believe is discharged or may be
discharged from any outfall. For every pollutant you list, briefly describe the reasons you believe it to be present and report any analytical data in your
possession.
I.POLLUTANT
2. SOURCE
(.POLLUTANT
2. SOURCE
Asbestos
Used in insulation; trace
amounts may be washed
down drains in plant
area during maintenance
activities
Strontium
Trace elements occasionall
Uranium
Present in coal or oil
Vanadium
Used to start boilers
Zirconium
VI. POTENTIAL DISCHARGES
NOT COVERED BY ANALYSIS
Is any pollutant listed in Item V-C
a substance or a component of a substance which you currently use or manufacture
as an intermediate or final product or
byproduct?
X] YES (list all much pollutants below) ❑No (4o
to Item VI-B)
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
See Attachment 5 for chemicals used in process streams
EPA Form 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85) PAGE 3 of 4 CONTINUE ON REVERSE

TOXICITY TESTING
Do you have any knowledge or reason to beliel4hat any biological test for acute or chronic toxicity h tx,en made on any of'vour discharges or on a
receiving water in relation to your discharge within the last 3 years?
VMS ridentift the testis) and describe their purposes below) No (go to Section VI70
Outfall 003 - In 1996, three acute toxicity tests (quarterly) were performed on
the effluent of Outfall 003. The monitoring was performed as fathead
minnow 24-hour static tests using effluent collected as 24-hour composites.
Results showed no acute toxicity.
Outfall 006 - Both in 1995 and 1996, annual acute toxicity tests were performed on
the effluent of Outfall 006. The monitoring was performed as fathead
minnow 24-hour static tests using effluent collected as grab samples.
Results showed no acute toxicity.
IILCONTRACT ANALYSIS INFORMATION
were any of the analyses reported in Item V performed by a contract laboratory or consulting firm?
YES (list the name, address, and telephone number of, and pollutants '1 No (go to Section 1x)
analyzed by, each such laboratory or firm belour)
A. NAME
a. ADDRESS
G. TELEPHONE
(area code & no.
0.ANTS ANALYZED
lut
Industrial and
3000 Weston Parkway [phone]
All pollutants with
Environmental Analysts,
Cary, NC 27513
the exception of
Inc.
pH, chlorine, flow,
and temperature.
IX. CERTIFICATION
l certify underpenehy oflawthet this document end all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properlygother andeve/uate the information submitted. Based onmy inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or
those persons directly responsible forgethering the information, the information subminedis, to the best ofm y knowledge andbefief, true, accurate, and complete.
l am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
A. NAME & OFFICIAL TITLE Ifypl Orprlol)
8, PHONE NO. )area code & no.)
John J. Carney - Manager
[phone]
C. SIGNATURE
D. DATE SIGNED
V
EPA Form 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85) PAGE 4 OF 4

r I -
EPA I.D. NUMBER (copy from item 1 of Forin 1)
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE IN THE UNSHADED AREAS ONLY. You may report some or all of
this information on separate sheets (use the same format) instead of completing these pages. NC000342 S
Form Approved ♦ _
OMB No 2040.0086
dnn. n...
SEE INSTRUCTIONS.
pUI FALL NO
V. INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS (continued from page 3 of Form 2-C)
003
PART A - You must provide the results of at least one analysis for every pollutant in this table. Complete one table for each outfall. See instructions for additional details.
2. EFFLUENT
3. UNITS
4. INTAKE (optional)
1. POLLUTANT
epeei/y i/hlankJ0
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b.MAXI a(fa
do
?,AYI¢
aUa a
NO. OF
a. LONG
TERMd.
a.CONCEN-
TRATION
b. MASS
4 NO. OF
ANALYSES
III
Ial rw+f
(I)
la) N
ncf w�iwwn ory
(a) N
ANALYSES
10
nc [nrw canon
1v) N
a. Biochemical
Oxygen Demand
1.3
5429
1
kg/day
(BOD)
mg/L
b. Chemical
Oxygen Demand
2S
___
1
___
(COD)
mg/L
c. Total Organic
Carbon(TOC)
3.9
16,288'y
1
mg/L
kg/day
d. Total Suspended
Solids(TSS)
< 6
---
1
mg/L
---
e. Ammonia (as N)
< 0.07
___
1
mg/L
---
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
f. Flow
1157
1108.3
1031.29
244
MGD
---
9. Temperature
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
("inter)
25
20
19
60
'C
h. Temperature
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
(sammer)
39
36
31.2
1P4
`C
MINIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
I pH
]MAXIMUM
6.9
7.3
13
STANDARD UNITS
PART 8 - Mark "X" in column 2-a for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe is present. Mark -X- in column 2-b for each pollutant you believe to be absent. If you mark column 2e for any pollutant
which is limited either directly, or indirectly but expressly, in an effluent limitations guideline, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. For other pollutants for which you mark
column 2a, you must provide quantitative data or an explanation of their presence in
your discharge. Complete one table for each outfall. See the instructions for additional details and requ irem
I. POLLUT.
]. MARK •x•
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
S. INTAKE loprivalal)
ANT ANDS
0. ee-
b. e�
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b. MAXIrtyM 3�?,^
Iapola
VALUE
¢
¢.LONG T �M AY� . VALUE
OVaa ¢
dN0.0
e. LON TERM
AVERAGE VALUE
CA$ND.
ANAL.
a. LONCErv-
-RATION
b. MASS
NO. OF
ANAL-
conc[nrgwnoN
(a)rwff
COnCE NTgwTION
1,) A..
COxC [nTnw non
(z)Nwff
z
conce NTRwilon
w
(x)n a
(I/aVallaal¢)
f CNT
1
VSES
VSES
e. Bromide
(24959.67-9)
X
< 1
---
1
mg/L
---
b. Chlorine,
Total Residual
X
0.10
417.7
1
mg/L
kg/day
¢. Color
X
15
NA
1
CPU
NA
d. Fecal
Col/
Conform
X
24
NA
1
100 ml
NA
e. Fluoride
(16984-48A)
X
q,1
417.7
1
mg/L
kg/day
[t. ra
ya
NiN'it,7t(,'—trN)
X
0.15
626.5
1
mg/L
kg/day
EPA Form 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85) PAGV n I CONTINUE ON REVERSE

I. POLLUT-„x'mAaK
,xv•
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
5. INTAKE (optional)
ANT AND
e. aa-
b.ec
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b. MAXIM M 37
iaaal
SI V VALUE
aG¢
LL N TfpM
IaVaa
Mbr. f. VALUE
¢
d. NO.OF
a.CONCEN
� VA%-.
A E A
V E
>. NO.OF
CAS NO.
Ofavailable)
����
saw♦
¢veo
ary
ANAL-
YSES
TR ATION
b. MASS
ANAL -
YSES
I,) m
1>I m
Urvcarv1iwa
lal m
corvcxrvtww
9. Nitrogen,
Total Organic
X
19gL
kg/day
(m N)
0.8
3503
0.
h. Oil and
Graeae
X
5
---
1
mg/L
---
1. Phoeyhorua
(as Pl.Total
X
0.097
424.8
0.097
406.9
0.049
191.27
8
mg/L
kg/day
(7723-14-0)
J. Radioactivity
Total
X
< 1.5
--—
1
pCi/L
---
(2) Beta,
Total
X
2.93
0.012 *
1
pCi/L
Ci/day
diem'
Total
TESTING
AND REPORTING
NOT RR
QUIRED
(4) Radium
225, Total
TESTING
AND REPORTING
NOT REQUIRED
it. Sulfate
(m 304)
X
13
54,294.8
1
mg/L
kg/day
(14808-79-8)
1. Sulfide
(do 8)
X
< 1
---
1
mg/L
---
m.Sulfhe
(m 803)
X
< 2
---
i
mg/L
---
(14265-45.3)
n. Surfactants
X
0.5
2088.3*
1
mg/L
kg/day
o. Aluminum,
Tout
X
260
1
Ug/L
kg/day
80-51
1085.9*
p. Barium.
Total
X
< 500
--_
1
Ug/L
--_
(744039-3)
Total an'
X
< 0.1
---
1
mg/L
---
(7440.424)
r. Cobalt,
Total
X
< 0.05
---
1
mg/1
--_
(7440.48-4)
a Iron, Total
(7439419-6)
X
0.39
,y
1628.8
1
mg/1
kg/day
L Megn"lum,
Total
X
3 4
14,200.2*
1
mg/L
kg/day
(7439 95-4)
u. Molybdenum,
Total
X
< 0.05
---
1
mg/L
---
(7439.98-7)
v. anganeae,
Total
X
0.04
167.1*
1
mg/L
kg/day
V
(743996-5)
w. Tin, Total
(7440-31-5)
X
< 0.1
---
I
mg/L
---
Y
x. Titanium,
Tcta
X
< 50
---
1
Ug/L
---
(7440-32-6)
EPA Form 3510-2C )Rev. 2-85) PAUlt V-Z CONTINUE ON PAGE V -3

EPA I.D. NUMBER (Copy from Item I Of Form 1)
OUT FALL NUMBER
Farm Approved
OMB No 2040 0086 .
NC0003425
003
Approval expires 7 31 88
CONTINUED FROM PAGE 3 OF FORM 2-C
PARTC- Ifyou are a primary industry andthisoutfall containsprocess wastewater, refer to Table 2c-2 in the instructions to determine which ofthe GC/MS fractions you must test for. Mark "X"in column
2-a for all such GC/MS fractions that apply to your industry and for ALL toxic metals, cyanides, and total phenols. If you are not required to mark column 2-a (secondary industries, nonprocess
wastewater ouffalis, and nonrequired GC/MS fractions), mark -X" in column 2-b for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe is present. Mark -X" in column 2-c for each pollutant you -
believe is absent. if you mark column 2a for any pollutant, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. if you mark column 2bfor any pollutant, you must provide the results
of at least one analysis for that pollutant if you know or have reason to believe it will be discharged in concentrations of 10 ppb or greater. If you mark column 2b for acrolein, acrylonitrile, 2.4
dinitrophenol, or 2-methyl-4, 6 dinitrophenol, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for each of these pollutants which you know or have reason to believe that you discharge in
concentrations of 100 ppb or greater. Otherwise, for pollutants for which you mark column 2b, you must either submit at least one analysis or briefly describe the reasons the pollutant is expected tq
be discharged. Note that there are 7 pages to this part; please review each carefully. Complete one table Is// 7 pages) for each outfall. See instructions for additional details and requirements.
I. POLLUTANT
1. MARK W
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
5. INTAKE (optional)
AND CAS
" r
b. •i
G •i-
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALVE
b. MAXI M ]0 DrY VALUE
auao a
LOT
°.LONG T M
°Y at1
AYR VALUE
° alE
a NO OF
a. CONCEN-
a. LONG
TERM
b. NO.OF
NUMBER
(if aoailO life)
`�a
ANAL-
YSES
TRATION
4MASS�rf
ANA L
YSES
I'lTR
N
(r) N
(�)
oN<exiParloN
la) Naas
I.)
oxcaNrwaT,oN
(x) NA..
I.) c
trl N
METALS, CYANIDE, AND TOTAL PHENOLS
1M. Antimony,
1
mg/L
---
Total (7440-36.0)
X
X
< 0.05
---
2M. Arsenic,Total
X
2
8.76
2
8.39
1.5
5.86
8
ug/L
kg/day
440.38.2)
3M. Beryllium,
Total, 7440 41 7)
X
X
< 0.02
---
I
mg/L
---
4M. Cadmium,
2
---
1
ug/L
- - -
Total(7440-43-9)
X
X
SM. Chromium,
5
---
1
llg/L
- - -
Total (7440-47-3)
X
X
SM.�opper Tate)
3 3
13.7 *
1
ug/L
kg/day
(7440.666)
X
X
7M. Leaf. Tole)
10
---
1
ug/L
---
(743942-1)
X
X
am. Mercury, Total
X
X
0 2
---
1
ug/L
---
(7439-97-6)
9M. Nickel, Total
X
X
10
---
1
Ug/L
(7440.02-01
10M. Selenium,
X
X
5
_--
1
U$/L
---
Total (7782-49.2)
11 M. Si Ivor, Total
X
X
< 0.01
___
1
mg/L
---
(7440.22-4)
12M. Thallium,
X
X
< 0.01
---
1
mg/L
---
Total (7440 2s 0)
13M. Zinc, Total
X
X
10
---
1
ug/L
---
(7440-66.8)
14M. Cyanide,
X
X
< 01
___
1
mg/L
---
Total (57-12-5)
ISM. Phenols,
X
X
< 070 5
---
1
mg/L
---
Total
DIOXIN
2,3,7,8 Tetra-
DESCRIBE RESULTS
chlorodibenzo P-
X
0i0x in (1764-01 61
EPA Form 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85) PAGE V-3 CONTINUE ON REVERSE

:ONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
1. POLLUTANT
2. MARK 'X
1 3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
5. INTAKE (optional)
AND CAS
NUMBER
r
b ae
L ar
e. MAXIMUM DAILY VALU!
b. MAXI M ],pp
aUmlablC
pp��V VALVE
C.LONG T M
pWfbble
//g�yypp VALUE
It NO.OF
s. CONCEN
a. LONG
TERM
b. NO.OF
(ifaapilabin)
Ve
�w•,
SSnz
• aVe
ei'r:r
ANAL-
YSES
TRATION
b. MACSVERAG
ANAL-
YSES
Id
III M
DI
coxcwxrx•n
l21 M•
14
oxcexrwwn
(1) M
(q cencax-
rwwnex
121 MASS
GC/MS FRACTION —VOLATILE COMPOUNDSwwr
IV. Acrolein
1107-02.8)
x
X
5
1
ug/L
2V. Acrylonitrlla
< 5
1
ug/L
(107-13-1)
X
x
3V(71. Benzene
x
x
< 5
1
Ug/L
no-
methyl)(Etheerr
TESTING
AND REPORTING
NOT
REQUIRED
(542438-1)
SV. Bromoform
x
x
5
1
Ug/L
(75-26-2)
6V. Carbon
Tetrachloride
x
X
< 5
1
Ug/L
(56.23.5)
7V. Chlorobenzena
(108-90-71
x
x
< 6
1
ug/L
BV. Chlorodi-
bromomethane
x
x
< 5
1
ug/L
(124-48-1)
9V. Chloroathene
X
x
< lO
1
ug/L
(75-00.3)
Ether
.tvivinvi lEth
x
x
< 10
1
Ug/L
(110- 543
1110.76-8)
11 V. Chloroform
x
x
< 5
1
ug/L
(67-66-3)
12V- Dichloro-
bromomethene
x
x
5
1
ug/L
(75-27-4)
13V. Dichloro-
difluoromMhana
TESTING
AND REPORTING
NOT
REQUIRED
(75-71-8)
14V. 1,1-Dichlero-
x
x
< 5
1
u$/L
ethane (75.34-3)
15V- 1,2-01chloro-
x
R
< 5
1
ug/L
ethene (107.064)
—�-
_--
i6V. 1,1-Dichloro-
X
X
< 5
�—
--�
-
1
ug/L
---
-- -
ethylene (75-35.4)
17V. 1,2-Dichloro-
X
X
< 6
1
ug/L
-
propene (78 87-5)
1BV. 1,3-Dichloro-
propylene1542-75-6)
X
X
< 5
1
u$/L
19V. Ethylbenzene
x
x
< 8
1
ug/L
(100-41.4)
20V. Methyl
X
x
< 10
1
ug/L
Bromide (74-83 9)
21V. Methyl
Chloride 3)
X
X
< 10
1
ug/L
(74-87
-PA Form 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85) PAGE V-4 CONTINUE ON PAGE V 5

r e.m A .. ..we
EPA I.D. NUMBER (COPY from Item 1 O/FOrm I)
OU fFALL NUMBER ROMB
Na. 20400086
:ONTINUED FROM PAGE VA
NC0003425
003
Approval eapaes 7 31 88
1. POLLUTANT
2. MARK X�
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
5. INTAKE (,,Poona))
AND CAS
NUMBER
anv
b..c-
c w
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b. MAXIM M 3,po
1 aven
p/kY VALUE
aSP)
C.LONG TgjiM
(1/ aaal
yq VALUE
a ¢
� bl
d NO.OF
LONG
TERM
b. NO.O�F
U/.uallabit7
a
ANAL-
YSES
a. CONCEN-
TRATION
b. MASS
I'�w lenn
(+1 Kua
ANAL-
YSES
cane tw�iwwnon (r) Kwfe
cone we�rlwwnan
(rl
n�)wwn on
(.1 K
GC/MS FRACTION — VOLATILE COMPOUNDS (continued)
22V. M.thylene
Chloride (75-09-2)
X
X
5
1
llg/L
-
23V, 1,1,2,2-Tetra-
chloroethane
X
X
l 7
---
1
ug/L
---
(79-34-5)
24V. Totrechloro-
ethylene (127.18-41
X
X
< 5
---
1
ug/L
---
25V. Toluene
(108438-3)
X
X
6
---
1
ug/L
---
26V. 1,2-Trans-
Dichloroethylene
1
X
X
< 5
---
ug/L
---
(156-60-51
27V. 1,1,1 Trl-
ahloroethene
X
X
< 5
---
1
ug/L
---
(71-55-6)
28V. 1,1,2-Trl-
chloroethens
X
X
< 5
---
1
ug/L
---
(79.00-6)
29V. Trichloro-
ethylene
X
X
5
---
1
ug/L
---
(79-01-6)
30V. Trichloro
tluoromathane
X
< 10
---1
ug/L(75-69-4)
Ix
31 V. V lnylChloride 4)X
10
---
1
ug/L
---
(75-01
GC/MS FRACTION — ACID COMPOUNDS
IA. 2 Chloropheno
(9557-8)
X
X
< 10
---
1
ug/L
---
2A. 2,4-Dlchloro
2)
X
X
< 10
---
1
Ug/L
---
nhenol (120 83
3A. 2,4-Dimethyl
X
X
< 10
---
1
ug/L
---
nhenol (105 67 9)
4A. 4,6-Dlnitro-O
Cresof(534.52 1)
X
X
< 50
---
1
ug/L
---
6A. 2,4-Dlnitro-
X
X
< 50
---
1
ug/L
---
i,henol (51 28-6)
6A. 2 Nitrophenol
X
X
< 10
---
1
llg/L
---
188 75-5)
1 A. 4 Nitrophanol
(10002-7)
X
X
< 50
---
1
ug/L
---
YA. P-Chloro M-
Cresol (59 50-71
X
X
10
---
1
Ug/L
---
')A, Pentachloro
phenol (87-86-5)
X
X
< 50
---
1
ug/L
---
IPA. Phenol
' 108952)
X
X
< 10
1
llg/L
I 1 A. 2,4,6 T6
hlorophenol
X
X
< 10
---
1
ug/L
---
-- -
88 06 2 )

:ONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
[.POLLUTANT
z. MwRx 'x'
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
5. INTAKE lopnnnal)
AND CAS
arr`r
h ai-
G u
e. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
D. MAXIM M 1pp
r aaallabl¢
pp��Y VALUE
C.LONG T�pM
fll aValleble
1�yp VALUE
d NO OF
a. LONG
TERM
n. NO.OF
NUMBER
V ava
ANAL-
e. CONCEN
b. MASS
ANAL-
I'I w•
Irl r
()
lal M w
1�1 RAI­w
Irl �+
nl a
lel N w
h/aValla blr 1
w
u..r
VSES
TRATION
VSES
GC/MS FRACTION — BASE/NEUTRAL
COMPOUNDS
B. Ac ntbene
TESTING
AND REPOR
ING NOT R
Q UIRED
(83 32-9) 9)
1
28. Acenaphtylene
(208-96-8)
3B. Anthrecene
(120.12.7)
48. Benzidine
(92-87-5)
5B. Benzo (a)
Anthrecene
(56 55-3)
6E. Benzo (a)
Pyrene (50-32.8)
78. 3,"enzo-
1luorenthene
(205-99-2)
8B. Benzo (chi)
Perylene
(191-24-2)
_
9B. Benzo (it)
Fluorenthene
(207-08-9)
IDS. Sis (2-Chloro-
ethoxy) Methane
(111-91-1)
11 S. Bis(2-Chioro-
ethyl) Ether
(111."4)
128. Bis(2-Chlauso-
arapr6 Ether (102-W I)
13B. Bis (2-Ethyi-
hexyl) Phthalate
(117-81-7)
148. 4.8romo.
phenyl Phanyl
Ether (101.66-3)
15B. Butyl Benzyl
Phthalate (86.68-7
169. 2-Chloro-
naphthalene
(91-58-7)
17B. 4-Chloro-
phenyl Phenyl
_
Ether 7005-72-3)
18B. Chrywne
(218-01-9)
198. Dibenzc (qh)
Anthrecene
(53 70-3)
208. 1,2-Dichloro.
benzene (95-50-1)
21 B. 1,3-Dichloro.
benzene (541 73-1
EPA Form 3510-2C (Rev. 2.85) PAGE V•6 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-7

Form Arove
EPA 1.0. NUMBER (Copy from Ifem I of Form 1)
OUTFALL NUMBER
p
p 1 ' •
OMB No. 2040-0086
CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-6 NC0003425
003
Approval expires 7.31 88
1. POLLUTANT
AND CAS
z. MARK -x
- 3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
5. INTAKE (�rpfionall
NUMBER
+r
b ea-
c e�-
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b. MAXI M i1
ouol"IaD/e
DAY VALUE
c.LONG T M
aua/1aD18
AYp .VALUE
d No OF
C LONG
TERM
h NO.Or
Uf uvaflahh'1
'� ..
+inr
+v
Lu�r
ANAL
USES
a. CONC"AVL
TRATION
b, MA84
ANAL
(Q (t)w'w++
I')
I+I ..w++
1'1
I•I NwM
('1c Dace
conu.n
coacw Ntwwn
zwwnonn
la1 Rwu
USES
GC/MS FRACTION — BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (continued'
228. 1,4-Dichloro-
-- .
benzene (106-46.7
TESTING
AND REPORIING
NOT RIQUIRM
238. 3,3'-Dichicro
benzidine
(9194-1)
-
24B. Dlethyl
Phthalate
(84-66.2)
255. Dimethyl
Phthalate
(131-11-3)
26B. DI-N-Butyl
Phthalate
(84-74-2)
27B. 2,4-Dinitro-
toluene (121.14-2)
28B. 2,6-Dinitro.
toluene (606.20.2)
298. DI-N-Octyl
Phthalate
(117-84-0)
henyl-
30#Fluorene
-
hyAzo-
ben2.66-7
31thene
"
(2
32ne(8
338. Heucnbrobe
118-74-11
11
348. Haxa-
chlorobutediene
(87-68-3)
35B. Hexachloro-
cyelopentediege
(77-47-4)
368. Hexachloro.
ethane (67-72-11
37B.Indeno
(1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
(193-39-5)
38B. laophorone
(78-59-1)
39B. Naphthalene
(91-20-3)
40S. NKrobenzene
(98-95 3)
41 B. N-N itro-
sodimethylemine
(62759)
42B. N-Nitrosodl
N-Propylamine
621.64.7)
cPA Fnrm 351 n-9C fRo., 7 A91 nnnc v.T
!`nNT/MIIF DM RF\rFRCc

ONTINUE M THE FRONT
C D FRO
1. POLLUTANT
2. MARK'%'
1 3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
S. INTAKE (.1ptl..rlal)
AND CAS
VALUE
b. MAXI M 3,p0 p Y VALUE
C.LONG TEjtM t��(p
VALUE
i1 NO OF
a. LONG
TERM
1• NO OE
NUMBER
„�+
�ee
Cw�-
c
e. MA%1 MUM DAILY
I aUellaS
(I/OU41(COl¢�
ANAL
-
a.CONCENAVERAG
b. MASS
-1
ANAL
-
PI I•I
c oxcax+w
�'I _
I.1 «...
_----_—
bl
I•I .,...
('I c
I.1 w
p/OveilaDlel
aciw
iir`�+
iw
YSES
TRATON
VISES
GC/MS FRACTION—BASEMEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (continued)
438. N-NItrO-
sodiphenylamine
TEST
NG AND REPORTING
NOT
REQUIRED
(86.30.61
-
44B. Phananthrens
(86-018)
45B. Pyrans
(129-00-0)
468. 1,2,4- Tri
chlorobenzane
(12082-1)
GC/MS FRACTION — PESTICIDES
1P. Aldrin
TESTING
REPORT
NG NOT REWIRED
(309-00-2)
2P. Q-BHC
(319-84-6)
3P. Q-BHC
(319-857)
4P.'r-BHC
(58-89-9)
5P. 6-BHC
(319,86-0)
6P. Chlordane
(57.74 9)
7P. 4 A' DDT
(50-29 3)
8P. 4,4--DDE
(72-55 9)
9P. 4,4' DDD
(72.54.8)
TOP. Dieldrin
(60-67-1)
11P. 0-Endowlfan
(115.29-7)
12P. Q-Endowlfan
(I16.29-7)
13P, ndosvlfan
Sulfate
(103"78)
14P. Endrin
-
(72 208)
15P. Endrin
Aldehyde
(7421-93-4)
_
16P. Heptachlor
(76448)
EPA FO¢T 3610-2C (Rev. 2-85) PAGE V-8 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-9

Fnrm dnnrn�o.l ^ +-
EPA
I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item I of Form 1)
OUTPALL NUMBER
OMB No'2040.0086
NC0003425
003
Approval exptre5 731 88
:ONTINUED FROM PAGE V•S
I. POLLUTANT
z. MAwx •x•
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
S. INTAKE Ioptionall
AND CAS
er+ •
ixwvi-
Gee
e. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
MAXIFI M ]yy
( UValloele)
pp//��Y VALUE
c.LONG TERM
fll oVa(Ia
/gyp VALY
Dlt
d.NO.OF
a LON+:
IERM
hNO.OF
NUMBER
uex!
ANAL-
e. CONCEN
U. MASS
ANAL
Id wnow
IH ..wee
coauw+iw w_m
dl .+•o
ICI
1+1 Nw••
1.1 wwc^m
1+1 ..wu
p/aoailabiel
o
iin�
Fi Nr
VSES
TAATION
VSES
GC/MS FRACTION PESTICIDES (continued)
17P. Heptachlor
Epoxide
TES
ING AND REPORTING
NI
IT REQUIR
(1024-57-3)
18P. PCB-1242
(53469-21-9)
19P. PCB-1254
(11097-69-1)
20P. PCB-1221-
----_
(111 "28.2)
21P. PCB-1232
(11141-16-6)
22P. PCB-1246
(12672-29.6)
23P. PCB-1260
(11096.82 5)
24P• PCB-1016
--
-
—
(12674-11.21
25P•Toxaphene
(8001-35-2)
PAGE V-9
* Mass value calculated using flow value obtained during sampling (1104 MGD).

O,
EPA 1.0. NUMBER (copy from Item I of Form 1)
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE IN THE UNSHADED AREAS ONLY. You may report some or all of
this information on separate sheets fuse the same format) instead of completing these pages. N00003425
Form Approved I _
OMB No 2040 0086
Ap roval ex 731 88
SEE INSTRUCTIONS.
P ores -
011l l NI.L NO
V. INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS (continued from page 3 of Form 2 C1 AM
006
PART A - You must provide the results of at least one analysis for every pollutant in this table. Complete one table for each outfall. See instructions for additional details.
2. EFFLUENT
3. UNITS
4. INTAKE (npflUl1011
I. POLLUTANT
(specify if blank!
a. MAXIMUM GAILY VALUE
. MAXI M ]
1 aaa/a
H
p V VALUE
°
SP
C. ON
I °°° ° °
d. NO. OF
b. LONG
TERM
a. CONCEN-
TRATION
b. MASS
b. NO. OF
ANALYSES
I.)
Iaf Nwcs
w1i
CONCLa.
ta) ^'wee
nc ew,iw wrron
(xf ^r
ANALV S[S
cows a nr�wwnon
Of Nw
Biochemical
Demand
1.0
0.05
1
mg/L
kg/day
(BOD)"
b. Chemical
Oxygen Demand
` 25
---
1
mg/L
---
(COD)
c. Total Organic
Carbon (TOC)
2.4
0.13 *
1
mg/L
kg/day
d. Total Suspended
Solids(TSS)
23
5.05
16.5
2.31
5.61
0.52
16
mg/L
kg/day
e. Ammonia forN)
0.12
0.006 *
1
mg/L
kg/day
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
f. Fiov,
0.058
0.037
0.0245
16
MGD
9. Temperature
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
(.infer)
---
— — —
°C
h. Temperature
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
(summer)
25
1
°C
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
rpH
6.5
7.9
6.5
7.9
32
STANDARD UNITS
PART B - Mark ..X., in column 2-a for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe is present. Mark "X" in column 2-b for each pollutant you believe to be absent. If you mark column 2a for any pollutant
which is limited either directly, or indirectly but expressly, in an effluent limitations guideline, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. For other pollutants for which you mark
column 2a, you must provide quantitative data or an explanation of their presence in your discharge. Complete one table for each outfall. Seethe instructions for additional details and requirem
I. POLLUT-
2. MARK •X
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
5. INTAKE (oprinrlall
ANT AND
a. ae-
b ai
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b. MA%1f.( M ]p
(I�pUallaalc
p/�Y VALUE
C.LONG T[pM /��(p VALUEe.
(Ij aUa#abr
QNO.O
LONG TERM
AV ERAGE VALUE
NO. OF
CAS NO.
Ye
L1ri.°ir
` _
ANAL-
8. LONCEN-
b. MASS
.
ANAL-
(xl N
Ir
(aI w
Ia) rwu
r
<ontcnrwwnon
Ixf NAo
(if available )
Y9E3
RATION
YSES
a. Bromide
X
` 1
(24959-67-9)
---
1
mg/L
---
b. Chlorine,
Total Residual
X
0.10
0.005
13
mg/L
kg/day
c. color
X
20
NA
1
CPU
NA
d. Fecal
Col/
Coliform
X
14
NA
1
NA
100 ml
e. Fluoride
(16984-48,8)
X
0.3
0.02
1
mg/L
kg/day
I. Nitrate—
Nitrlte(aaN)
X
0.44
0.02
1 1
mg/L
kg/day
EPA Form 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85) PAGE V-1 CONTINUE ON REVERSE

1. POLLUT-
2. "ARK 'X'
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
5. INTAKE (rrp tianul)
ANT AND
e, ea
b.�e
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
b. MAXIM M 3.po
IaUallabla
po/�1Y VALUE
GLON T ,RM
fll avo
u VALUE
aDP.?
d. NO.OF
a, CONCEN-
9� LOIyG TEgM
AVERAGE VALUE
NO.OF
CAS NO.
(1/available)
����-
se rv+
o
ary
ANAL-
VSES
TRATION
b. MASS
ANAL-
YSES
c
1.1 ,,,
(zI N
h) «
(al MASS
9. Nitrogen,
Total Or9aniC
X
< 0.22
---
1
mg/L
---
(ar N)
h. Oil and
X
5
---
mg/L
__
Greene
1. Phosphorus
(as P), Total
X
0.023
0.001
1
mg/L
kg/day
(7723-14-0)
1. Radioactivity
X
2.02
---
1
pCi/L
---
TotallPha
12) Beta,
Total
X
3.98
2.17x10—
1
pCi/L
Ci/day
(3) Radium,
TESTING
AND REPORTING
NOT REQUIRED
4) Radium
226, Total
TESTING
AND REPOR
ING NOT REQUIRED
it. Sulfate
foaSO4)
X
170
9.3 *
1
mg/L
kg/day
(14808-798)
I. Sulfide
(ms)
X
� 1
---
1
mg/L
---
m. Sulfite
loss og)
X
< 2
---
1
mg/L
---
(14266-46-3)
n.8urtaotants
X
0.5
it
0.03
1
mg/L
kg/day
o. Aluminum,
X
200
0.011 *
1
ug/L
kg/day
(Total
7 429.80-5)
P. Barium,
TotalX
< 500
---
1
ug/L
---
(7440-39.3)
a• Baron,
Total
X
/' 0.1
___
1
mg/L
___
(7440-a28)
r. cobalt,
now-48-4)
X
< 0.05
---
1
mg/L
---
L Iron, Total
(7430-89-6)
X
0.28
0.02
1
mg/L
kg/day
t Magnesium,
Total
X
15
0.82 *
1
mg/L
kg/day
(7439 95-4)
u. Molybdenum,
Total
X
< 0.05
---
1
mg/L
---
(7439-987)
v. Total rean..s,
X
0.26
0.01 *
1
mg/L
kg/day
(7439-96-5)
w. Tin, Total
(7440-31-5)
g
0.1
___
1
mg/L
___
x. Titanium,
Total
X
50
---
(7440-32.6)
EPA Form 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85) PAGE'V-Z CONTINUE ONVAGE V' 3

EPA 1.0. NUMBER (copy from Item I Of FOrm 1)
OUTFALL NUMBER
Form Approved
NC0003425
006
OMB No 2040-0086 1
Approval expires 7 31 88
�ONTINUED FROM PAGE 3 OF FORM 2-C
PARTC- If you are a primary industry andthisoutfall contains process wastewater, refer to Table 2c-2 in the instructions to determine which of the GC/MS fractions you must test for. Mark "X"in column
2-a for all such GC/MS fractions that apply to your industry and for ALL toxic metals, cyanides, and total phenols. If you are not required to mark column 2-a (secondary industries, nonprocess
wastewater outfal/s, and nonrequired GC/MS fractions), mark -X- in column 2-b for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe is present. Mark -'X" in column 2-c for each pollutant you. -
believe is absent. If you mark column 2a for any pollutant, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. If you mark column 2b for any pollutant, you must provide the results
of at least one analysis for that pollutant if you know or have reason to believe it will be discharged in concentrations of 10 ppb or greater. If you mark column 2b for acrolein, acrylonitrile, 2.4
dinitrophenol, or 2-methyl-4, 6 dinitrophenol, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for each of these pollutants which you know or have reason to believe that you discharge in
concentrations of 100 ppb or greater. Otherwise, for pollutants for which you mark column 2b, you must either submit at least one analysis or briefly describe the reasons the pollutant is expected tcL
be discharged. Note that there are 7 pages to this part: please review each carefully. Complete one table (all7peges) for each outfall. See instructions for additional details and requirements.
I. POLLUTANT
]. MARK •x•
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
5. INTAKE (optional)
AND CAS
NUMBER
TzzT
b •a
C a[-
a. MAXIMUM GAILY VALUE
b. MAXI M ]0
1 °°a
DrY VALUE
a ¢
C.LONG T M
aU
IIYr . VALUE
a e
d NO.OF
a. CON CEN-
b. MASS
a. LONG
TERM
L
b. NO.OF
ANAL-
(f/auailaDle)
N
ANAL-
YSEs
rR ATION
VSEs
CONCENTRATION'
IzI N
�'I
TP aT10N
pl ..•[•
PI
COxC[NTN aT10N
IzI Nx[[
pl c°NceN-
IITION
Ixl N
METALS, CYANIDE, AND TOTAL PHENOLS
1M. Antimony,
X
X
` 0.05
---
1
mg/L
---
Total (7440-36.0)
2M. Arsenic, Total
X
X
10
---
1
ug/L
---
(7440.38-2)
3M. Beryllium,
Total,7440.41 7)
X
X
/,0,02
---
1
mg/L
---
4M. Cadmium,
Total (7440 43-9)
X
X
< 2
---
1
llg/L
5M. Chromium,
X
X
<
---
1
ug/L
Total (744047-3)
5
6M. Capper, T°tei
X
X
40
0.0002*
1
ug/L
kg/day
(7440-Ii0-8)
.
7M. LeeaTow
X
X
10
---
1
ug / L
---
17439-11
8M. Mercury, Total
X
X
< 0.2
---
1
ug/L
- - -
(743997-6)
9M. Nickel, Total
X
X
< 10
1
ug/L
- - -
(7440-02-0)
10M. Selenium.
X
X
5
---
ug/L
---
Total (T782-49.2)
11M. Silver, Total
X
X
< 0.01
---
mg/L
---
(7440-22-4)
12M. Thallium,
X
X
< 0.01
1
mg/L
Total (7440.28-0)
13M. ZJnc, Total
X
X
31
0.002 *
1
u L
g/
kg/day
(7440-66.6)
I AM. Cyanide,
X
X
< 0.01
---
1
mg L
---
Total (57-12.5)
IBM. Phenols,
X
0.005
0.0003*
1
mg/L
kg/day
Total
DIOXIN
2,3,7,8-Tetra-
OESCRISE RESULTS -
,:hlorodibenzo P
X
Dioxin (176401.6)
en -
EPA Form 3510-2C(Rev. 2.85) PAGE V-3 CONTINUE ON R`V` 1-

!ONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
1. POLLUTANT
AND CAS
z. MARK'%'
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
5. INTAKE (Ilplinnul)
NUMBER
'r
b'
•livi-
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALU!
b. MR%I M 3
au
gp/A�Y VALUE
1aD!¢
C.LONG T M
aVY11ebF
1�yp�i VALUE
d. NO.OF
A. LONG
TERM
b. NO.OF
(I/ nrudublr)
ouin
iwc-
•nxr
ANAL-
YSES
a. CON CEN-
TRATION
b. MASS
wa-
vnr
lliwwnon
Irl Kwu
Id «
lel xwu
III caxcnro
cone
caxcniixwnon
oncarliixwnon
x wriox
Ixl x+r•
YSES
GC/MS FRACTION —VOLATILE COMPOUNDS
1 V. Acrolein
1107-02-8)
X
X
5
---
1
Ug/L
---
2V. Acrylonitrile
(107.13-1)
X
X
5
---
1
Ug/L
---
3V. BeB.-21
X
X
< 5
---
1
Ug/L
---
(71:ana
4V. Ble (Chloro.
methyl) Ether
TESTING
AND REPORTING
NOT REWIRED
(542-08-1)
5V. Bromoform
(75-25-2)
X
X
G 5
---
1
Ug/L
---
6V. Carbon
Tetrachloride
X
X
< 5
---
1
Ug/L
---
(56-23-5)
7V. Chlorobanzane
(108.90-7t
X
R
. 6
___
1
ug/L
---
8 V. Chlorodi-
bromomethena
X
X
< 5
---
1
Ug/L
---
(124-48.1)
9V. Chloroethene
(75-00-3)
X
X
< 10
---
1
Ug/L
---
I OV. 2-Chloro-
ethylOnyl Ether
X
X
<10
---
1
Ug/L
---
(110.76 8)
11 V. Chloroform
I67-66-3)
X
X
< 5
---
1
Ug/L
---
12V. Dichloro-
bromomethane
X
X
< 5
---
1
Ug/L
---
(75-27-4)
13V. Dichloro-
dlfluoromathane
TESTING
AND REPORTING
NOT RE
UIRED
(75-71.8)
14V. 1,1.Dlchloro-
ethane (75.34-3)
X
X
< 5
---
1
Ug/L
---
15V. 1,2-Dichloro-
(107-06-2)
X
X
/ 5
_--
1
---
ethane
\
Ug/L
16V. 1,1-Dlchloro-
(75-35.4)
%
X
< 5
---
I
ethylene
ug/L
17V. 1,2-Dichloro-
X
X
6
---
propane (78-87-5)
1
Ug/L
---
_
18V. 1,3-Dichlaa.
propylene(542.75.6)
X
X'
G 5
---
1
Ug/L
---
1100 Ethylbenzene
X
X
/ 8
---
1
Ug/L
20V. Methyl
Bromide (74-83-9)
X
X
< 10
---
I
Ug/L
---
'
4
21V. Methyl
Chloride
X
X
10
---
1
ug/L
---
(74.87-3)
PA Form 3510-2C (Rev. 2-85) PAGE V-4 CONTINUE
ON PAGE V-8

Form Approved
PA I.D. NUMBER (copy from Item 1 Of FoALL
I)
OU (F NUMBER
OMB No. 2040-0086 r . • -
IONTINUED FROM PAGE VArm
NC0003425
006
Approval expires 7-31-88
I. POLLUTANT
i. MwNK'X'
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
S. INTAKE (optional)
AND CAS
NUMBER
Erc�r
4 aa-
c aa,
a. MAJtIM UM DAILY VALUF
b. MA%IM M 3p
aual'Iag�1
/�Y VALUE
c.LONG T RM
! aua
VALUE
���
a e
d NO.OF
a. CONCEN-
LONG
TERM
b. N0.0
(r/aeailablc)
w
euin-
va
irir
uwe
ax♦
ANAL-
YSES
TRATION
b. MASS
ANAL
YSES
Ir) (+) uwu
c xrnwnon
1rl
coxc ewrwwnox
(a) uwe•
(rl
cexce xrwwnax
la) uwaa
lriw roan-
1+1 Rwo
GC/MS FRACTION - VOLATILE COMPOUNDS (continued)
22V. Methylene
X
X
5
---
1
ug/L
---
-
Chloride (75-09-2)
23 V. 1,1,2,2.Tetra-
ehloroethane
X
X
7
---
1
ug/L
---
(79-34-5)
24V. Tetrachloro-
X
X
` 5
---
1
Ug/L
---
ethylone 1127-18.4)
25V. Toluene
(108.38.3)
R
R
< 6
---
1
ug/L
---
26V. 1,2-Trens-
Olchloroathylene
X
X
5
---
1
Ug/L
---
(156.60-5)
chlorw h� eri
X
X
5
---
1
ug/L
---
_
(71-55-6)
28V. 1,1,2-Tri--
chloroethene
X
X
< 5
-_-
1
ug/L
---
(79-0")
29V. TrieMoro-
X
X
< 5
---
1
ug/L
---
ethylene 79-01 .8)
30V. Trichloro-
fluoromethane
X
X
< 10
---
1
ug/L
---
(75-69.4)
31 V. V lnyyl
X
X
` 10
---
1
ug/L
---
Chloride 175-01-4)
GC/MS FRACTION - ACID COMPOUNDS
IA. 2-Chlorophen0
X
X
< 10
- - -
1
ug/L
---
(9557,B)
2A. 2,4-Dichloro.
Phenol (120.83-2)
X
X
< 10
_
--
1
ug/L
---
3A. 2,4-Dimethyl.
X
X
< 10
___
1
Ug/L
---
Phenol (105.67.9)
4A. 4,6.Dlnitro 0-
Cresoly534.52-1)
X
X
< 50
---
1
ug/L
---
"A. 2,4-Dinitro.
X
X
< 50
_--
1
ug/L
---
- -
-
Phenol (51-28-5)
6A. 2-Nitrophenol
X
X
/
10
___
1
Ug/L
---
(88-75.5)
`
7A. 4-Nltrophenol
(100-02.7)
X
X
50
___
1
ug/L
---
9A. P-Chloro-M-
Crawl
X
X
< 10
---
1
Ug/L
---
(59.50-7)
9A. Pentachloro-
rhenol (87-86 5)
X
R
< 50
---
1
ug/L
---
IOA. Phenol
X
X
< 10
___
1
ug/L
--_
10895-2)
11 A. 2,4,6-Tri-
hlorophenol
X
X
< 10
---
1
ug/L
---
98 06-2)

'ONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
I. POLLUTANT
z. MARK 'x-
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
5. INTAKE (optional)
AND CAS
ar•rt
b •m
G u
a. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
P. MAXIMUM 3,p
1(.Vpllpblf
p/�Y VALUE
c.LONG TEfiM
(IJ aaa"pp1Q
/�t[p VALUE
d.NO.OF
E. LONG
TERM
bryO.OF
NUMBER
�.a.
ANAL-
a. CONtEN
b. MASS
ANAL
1.1 L)M
I'l
PI ++ ��
I.)
I+I ++ wa
hIc
Irlu
by aauilablQ)
��nr
a
YSES
TRATION
YSES
GC/MS FRACTION ouBASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
1B. Acenephthene
(83-329)
TESTING
AND REPOR
ING NOT REQUIRED
28. Acenaphtylene
(20896.8)
3B. Anthracene
(120.12.7 )
48. Benzidine
(92 87-5)
5B. Benzo (a)
Anthracene
(56.55-3)
68. Benzo (a)
Pyrene (50-32.8)
78. 3,4-Senzo-
fluorenthene
(205-99-2)
8B. Benzo (ehi)
Perylene
(191-24-2)
_
98. Benzo (it)
Flu Orenthene
(207-08-9)
10B. Bit (2-Chlom-
ethoxy) Methane
(111.91.1)
11 B. Bit (2-Chioro-
ethyl) Ether
(111-44-4)
128.8is2-Chbrolsa-
mopyl) Ether(102-60.1)
138. Bit (2-Ethyl-
hezyl) Phthalate
(117.81-7)
146. 4-Bromo-
phanyl Phenyl
Ether (101.55-3)
15B. Butyl Benzyl
Phthalate (85-68-7
16S. 2-Chlora.
naphthalene
(91-58.7)
17B. 4-Chloro-
phenyl Phenyl
-
Ether 7005-72-3)
18B. Chrysene
(218-01-9)
19B. Dibenzo (qh)
Anthracene
(53-70-3)
206. 1,2-Dichloro.
benzene (95-50 1)
-
21 B. 1,3-Dichloro-
benzene (541-73 1
EPA Form 3510-2C (Rev. 2.85) PAGE V-6 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-7

EPA LD. m m OH NVMEER (COPY /ro/fe1 O/POI)
OUTFACE NUMBER
No _
OMBB No. 204010-0086 '
CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-6
NC0003425
006
Approval expires 7.3f 88
I. POLLUTANT
z. MARK •x•
3. EFFLUENT
A. UNITS
S. INTAKE (Optional)
AND CAS
NUMBER
M eb
.ew-
e. MA%IMUM GAILY VALUC
. MAXI M ]
aV
p/1 V VALUE
agi+e
C.LON6 T M
Goal/a
/gyp .VALUE
Die
It NO.OF
e. LONG
TERM
b.NO.OF
U/aveilabl+•1
+eve
rAa-
eenr
a vw
r
ANAL-
USES
a. CONCEN
TRATION
b. MASS
ANAL
VSES
1') I+I N•ae
conunrwwnon
1+I
concw nrewn
1+1 rwaa
1+1
uncenrewn
I+1 n•aa
p) mncen-
rwwnon
I+)a'
GC/MIS FRACTION - BASEMEUTRAL COMPOUNDS (contlnued-
220. 1,4-Dichloro-
benzene(106-467
TESTINIC
AND REPOPTING
NOT -REQUIRED
238. 3,3'-Dichloro
benzidine
(91.94-1)
24B. Diethyl
Phthalate
(84-66-2)
25B. Dlmethyl
Phthalate
(131.11-3)
26B. DI-N-Butyl
Phthalate
(84-74.2)
279. 2,4-Dinitro.
_
toluene(121-14-2)
288. 2,6.Dinitro.
toluene (606-20.2)
29B. Di-N-Octyl
Phthalate
(117.840)
308. 1.2-Dlphenyl-
--
---
hydrazine (ae Azo-
benzene)(122-66.7
31 B. Fluoranthene
(205-44-0)
32B. Fluorene
(86.73.7)
3et 38. Nazn
1111.74.0
1134B. Hexa-
chlorobutadiene
(87-66-3)
36B. Hexachloru-
Cyclupentedlege
(77.47-4)
36B. Hexachloro.
ethane (67-72-1)
378. Indeno
(1,2.3.cd) Pyrene
(193.39-5)
38B. Irophorona
(78.59-1)
398. Naphthalene
(91.20.3)
+
408Nitrobenzene
(98.65.3)
41 B. N-Nitro-
mclimethylamine
(6275-9)
428. N.Nltrotodl-
N-Propylamine
621.64-7

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
I.POLLUTANT
t. MARK 'X'
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
5. INTAKE (,Iptional)
AND CAS
NUMBER
rr tr
R
.v..
e. MA%IMUM DAILY VALUE
. MAXI M ]y
oa0/C
p/�Y VALUE
G.LONG TEpM
(1/aep
ypC, VALUC
oDlP/
O NO.OF
a. LONG
TERM
Ir No OF
pl ouailablrl
o IBASE/NEUTRAL
vi
iin�
iaw-•
ANA4
vsES
e. CONCEN
TRATION
IA MASS
ANAL-
YSES
co..�r�i.wnoe Irl Mwss
coecee�ilewn
1.1 rwss
UI
1'1 r.ws•
IJ c� eloN+
GC/MS FRACTION
COMPOUNDS (continued)
_
438. N-Nitro-
enylamine
TESTING
AND REPORTING
NOT
UIRED
(86-30
Ie6-30
_
_RQ
_ _
-
448. Phenanthrene
(85-01-8)
45B. Pyrans
(129.00-0)
-- _
468. 1,2,4. TO.
chlorobeniens
(120-82-1)
GC/MS FRACTION — PESTICIDES
1P. Aldrin
(309-00-2)
TESTING
AND REPOR
ING NOT RIQUIRED
2P. 0-BHC
(319 84-6)
3P. Q-BHC
(319-85-7)
4P.')'-BHC
(58-89-9)
5P. b-BHC
(319-86-8)
OP. Chlordane
(57-74.9)
7P. 4,4'-DDT
(50 29.31
8P. 4,4'-DDE
(72-55-9)
OP. 4,4'-DOD
(72-54E)
10P. Dleldrin
(60 57.1)
11 P. it-Endosulfan
(115-29-7)
12P. Q-Endosulfan
(115.29-7)
dowlfen
7b)
ndrin
-8)
ndrin
LAidehyd.
de34)eptachlor
8 )
EPA Form 3510 2C (Rev. 2-85) PAGE V-8 CONTINUE ON,PAGE V 9-

Fn.... A . A . .
EPA
I.D. NUMBER (COPY front Item I Of FOM I)
OUTFALL NUMBER
OMB NO 2040-0086
NC0003425
1 006
APproPat erpnes 7 31 88
:ONTINUED FROM PAGE V-8
I. POLLUTANT
a. MwRX •x•
3. EFFLUENT
4. UNITS
S. INTAKE (..ptinnpl)
AND CAS
ec...
to a.
cad-
e. MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
. MAXIN7 o a1p0/17
(
VALUE
Dle
C.LONG TER UMOIIOY
0!
RCC.. VALUE
I,6 /
�� NO OF
a LONG
IERM
b. NO.OF
NUMBER
.aYa
ANAL-
a. CONCEN
b. MASS
ANAL'
a
�'�
lal .+•sa
1.1
Itl .n...
pi cn.cex
1+1 r.a.
aileblr
YSES
TRATION
YSES
GC/MS FRACTION —'PESTICIDES (continued)
-
17P. Heptachlor
Epoxide
TESTINC
AND REPORTING
NOT REQUIRED
(1024.57-3)
18P. PCB-1242
(53469-21-9)
19P. PCH-1254
(11097.69.1)
20P. PCB-1221
(11104-28-2)
21P. PCB-1232
(11141-16-5)
22P. PCB-1248
(12572.29.6)
—
23P. PCB-1260
__—
---
--
- -
(11096-82-5)
-
24P. PCB-1016
--
-
(12674-11-2 )
25P. Toxaphene
(8001-35 2)
PAGE V-9
* Mass value calculated using flow value obtained during sampling (10 gpm).

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Attachment 1
U:\jo ie\permit\att.rox

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Attachment 1
Form 1 - Item X Existing Environmental Permits
Issuing Agency
Type of Permit
ID Number
Division of Environmental Management
NPDES
NC0003425
(DEM)*
DEM*
Ash Reuse Program
WQ00073604
Permit
DEM*
Construction and
1001R19
Operation of Air
Emission Sources
Division of Health Services
Solid Waste Permit
73-02
(Sanitary Landfill)
* Since issuance of permit agency name has changed to Division of Water Quality.
U: \jomie\permit\perm#. rox

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Attachment 2

iV
I g R G
i
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
^
N
� l ! F A % �
!r]y y
4 {
1
e
��
F i11 it
F �,�Cp
tzu
zr
x.►...e...
ISO
_ Q
1112 .ai;
a 6 y .6 F S Yn _ 1
�" • �ili�
•�
ML LABS
l
A f iw
CHUB
I _
rffi
Y
i Paz ,•
a"^!�
WORKS LAKE
�]9 ?sue
aeai J]B L
- za
u'fs
e I
—IO �.NC[T'0.lFii-l.rl �3Q3
H
.KALE
] ] 1WE5
SCALE FOR ENARGE>ABAFS
i�
Attachment 2 Form I - Item XI
Carolina Power & Light Company
I
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
Person County, NC
IA1
Page 1 of 2 November 1996

Roxboro $teem
-' ElecMc t
" Afterbay
Cane Creek Reservoir
NORTH CAROLINA ��
1
Auxiliary. Intake Main
9 Dam
�s> 1
Plant Site
Intake
Canal Dry Fly Ash
` - Landfill
10
Discharge
'T Ash Pond
Cobbs Creek
N
North Hyco River
0 1 2 3
I I I I
Kilos metes
South Hyco River (� l e
0 1 2
r
Miles
y
Attachment 2 Form 1- Item XI
Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
Person County, NC
Page 2 of 2 November 1996

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Attachment 3
U Aj oanie\permi [\att. rox

Treatment Oily Wastes
(Oil/Water (Fuel Loading
Separator) Area)
Stormwater
To Hyco
Q
Plant Process
Plant Drainage
Reservoir
Coal Pile Runoff Treatment Basin
Streams
System
Outfall 006
Catch Basin To Hyco
Overflowto '0------- Stormwater Reservoir
J Discharge Canal R
Treatment(Oil/Water
Water Treatment
Low Volume
Domestic Waste Sewage
Systems
Separator)
Collection Sump
Treatment Plant Alternate to
Discharge Canal
K
Ouffall 005
Unit 4 Cooling
To Atmosphere
Ash Pond
Ash Transportttormw4ate
Water
tMaintenanme
System
S Outfall002
F Drain
....-.-----.---............--..................................._....
mwater 0
T
G
Unit 3 Cooling
Unit 3 Cooling
To Atmosphere
Water
Tower
To Hyco
Reservoir
I Outfall 003
Attachment 3
Carolina Power & Light Company
P Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
Units 1 & 2
Discharge Canal Person County, N. C.
Cooling Water
Schematic of Water Flow
Page 1 of 3 October 1996

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Attachment 3
Form 2C - Item II -A Flows, Sources of Pollution, and Treatment Technologies
Stream
Estimated Average Flow
(MGD)
Comments
A
4
Make-up water for Water Treament Systems
B
505 (May thru Oct. 15)
512 (Oct. 16 thru Apr.)
Unit 3 Cooling Water Intake
C
592
Units 1 & 2 Cooling Water Intake
D
8.75
Evaporative losses from Unit 4 Cooling Tower
I
7
Unit 4 Cooling Tower Blowdown
F
16
Unit 4 Cooling Tower Intake
G
8.75
Evaporative losses from Unit 3 Cooling Tower
11
505
Unit 3 Cooling Tower discharge (May thru Oct. 15)
I
512
Unit 3 Cooling Water discharge (Oct. 16 thru Apr.)
1
0.015
Sewage Treatment Plant discharge
K
3
Low Volume discharge into Ash Pond
1,
19.25
Ash Transport discharge into Ash Pond
(Fly Ash Transport 17 MGD)
(Bottom Ash Transport 2.25 MGD)
M
0.75
Ash Transport discharge into Ash Landfill Drainage
N
0.17
Silo Wash Water
O
12
Ash Pond discharge into Discharge Canal
Y
1075
Discharge Canal flow into Hyco Reservoir
Q
0.4
Coal Pile Runoff Pond discharge into Hyco Reservoir
U:\jmnie\pemit\Hows.rox 2

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
R
1.37 (Flow based on 10
Portion of Unit 4 Cooling Tower Drainage area.
year 1 day precipitation
Rainfall Data Map - US
Dept. of Agriculture)
S
5.5 (Flow based on 10
Plant drainage area which does not discharge into
year 1 day precipitation
stormwater system.
Rainfall Data Map - US
Dept. of Agriculture)
T
15.12 (Flow based on 10
Plant drainage area, drainage area from dry flyash
year 1 day precipitation
handling system (including roadways, landfill, and
Rainfall Data Map - US
silo area), fuel oil storage containment, and
Dept. of Agriculture)
switchyard discharge into discharge canal.
U
11 (Flow based on 10 year
Outside storage drainage area discharge into coal pile
1 day precipitation Rainfall
runoff pond.
Data Map - US Dept. of
Agriculture)
U: \joanie\permiAflows. rox

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Attachment 4
U: \joanie\permit\att. rox

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Attachment 4
Form 2C - Item II-B Flows, Sources of Pollution, and Treatment Technologies
The Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, located in Person County, North Carolina, consists of four coal fired
generating units with net dependable capacities of 385, 670, 707, and 700 MWe for units 1, 2, 3, and 4
respectively. All plant waste streams are routed directly or indirectly to the Hyco Reservoir.
Chemical constituents contained in these discharges will, in part, be representative of the naturally
occurring chemical quality and quantity of the intake water and will also have chemical constituents of
such quality associated with similar discharges for fossil generating facilities of this size, type, and in
this geographical location. Either all or part of the elements in the Periodic Table, either singularly or
in any combination, may from time to time be contained in the discharges. Each component of the
discharges is described below.
Outfall 003 - Discharge Canal
At the point that the discharge canal enters the Hyco Reservoir, it contains the flows from several waste
streams, including once -through cooling water, stormwater runoff, and the effluent from the ash pond.
The ash pond in turn receives and treats combined flows from the ash transport system, the low volume
waste system, coal pile runoff, domestic sewage treatment plant effluent, silo wash water, the dry flyash
handling system, cooling tower blowdown, stormwater runoff, and drainage from the ash landfill.
Once -Through and Non -Contact Cooling Water
Condenser Cooling Water (CCW) for units 1, 2, and 3 is drawn from the Hyco Reservoir via an
intake canal and discharges to the Hyco Reservoir via a discharge canal. Flows for units 1, 2, and
3 are 249 MGD, 342 MGD, and 505 MGD respectively. Cooling is accomplished by evaporation
from the surface of Hyco Reservoir and mixing and convection with the reservoir waters.
During the summer months, unit 3 CCW is routed through mechanical draft cooling towers where
UAjmnie\permit\wass=. mx

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Svstem Permit Number NC0003425
most of the waste heat is removed by evaporation before the water is discharged to the reservoir
via the discharge canal along with the CCW of units 1 and 2. Additionally, once -through cooling
water is used as component closed cooling water, the flow of which is combined with the CCW
prior to introduction into the discharge canal.
Ash Pond Discharge
The ash pond receives ash transport water, low volume wastes, runoff from the ash landfill, dry fly
ash handling system wash water, blowdown from Unit 4 cooling tower, and sewage treatment plant
effluent. The pond provides treatment by sedimentation, oxidation, neutralization, equalization,
and adsorption.
Ash Transport Water
Water for sluicing ash to the ash pond is withdrawn from the CCW system as needed. The
plant will primarily supply ash sluice water from Unit 2. However, the facility will
continue to maintain the ability to operate the Unit 4 ash sluice pumps. The Unit 4 ash
sluice pumps are and will continue to be utilized for the following i) during maintenance
draining of the cooling tower, ii) back-up supply for the fire suppressant system, and iii) ash
sluicing pumps during operational events which require additional pumping. Normally,
only bottom ash is conveyed to the ash pond by sluicing: fly ash is handled dry by a
pneumatic system and is landfilled on site or sold. If the dry fly ash handling system is out
of service during plant operating periods, fly ash will be sent to the ash pond via the ash
sluicing systems until the dry system is restored. Such occurrences are expected to be
infrequent and brief.
Silo Wash Water
Ash silo wash water runoff and dust suppressant spray runoff from the dry fly ash handling
system are routed to the ash pond.
Low Volume Wastes
Boiler make-up water is withdrawn from the CCW system and filtered, softened, and
UAjoanie\permit\WMtrm.MX 2

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
demineralizered for treatment. Boiler water is treated with ammonia, hydrazine,
morpholine/elim-nox blend, and occasionally sodium hydroxide. Boiler blowdown is sent
to the ash pond via the low volume wastes collection system (LVWS); these are special
drains in the plant that flow by gravity to collection sumps and are pumped to the ash pond.
Ethylene glycol is used for freeze protection of some equipment and may be discharged to
the LVWS, as is some molybdate waste from the closed cooling water system, during
periods of maintenance. The plant's demineralizers are regenerated using sulfuric acid and
sodium hydroxide. When this equipment is rinsed, small amounts of these chemicals are
discharged to the low volume system, plans are to add a neutralization vessel for treatment
of the rinse water prior to its introduction into the LVWS. Essentially all plant equipment,
floor drains, and ash hopper seal water overflow also discharge to the LVWS.
Cooling Tower Blowdown
Unit 4 is the only unit that would produce cooling tower blowdown. Blowdown to the ash
pond may be required to keep concentrations of TDS to within proper operating limits. In
an effort to optimize efficiency, the Unit 4 cooling tower blowdown the facility plans to add
an additional route for Unit 4 cooling tower blowdown to the ash pond. Upon completion,
the blowdown will primarily be routed from the condenser outlet to the ash pond instead
of from the cooling tower to the ash pond. However, blowdown capability from the cooling
tower basin will be maintained as an alternate route.
Domestic Sewage
Domestic sewage from approximately 215 employees on site and occasional extra contract
maintenance employees is treated by an extended aeration treatment plant consisting of a
screen, comminutor, surge tank, aeration tank, clarifier, chlorine contact chamber, and a
sludge holding tank.
Coal Pile Runoff
The solids settling basin, which contains a portion of the wastewater runoff from the coal
pile and other coal handling areas of the plant, is routed to the ash pond.
UAjoanie\permit\wassrrm.mx 3

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Ash Landfill Drainage
Water for sluicing a minimum amount of bottom ash to the ash landfill is withdrawn from
the ash transport system as needed. The bottom ash is used to enhance the subsurface
drainage of the landfill.
Stormwater Runoff
The stormwater runoff which flows into the ash pond includes runoff from the plant
drainage area and the drainage area from the ash pond (including roadways).
Domestic Sewaee
As a backup to the extended aeration system described above, a septic tank, subsurface sand filter,
and chlorine dosing chamber that provide treatment if the other system is temporarily out of
service. Currently the effluent from this backup system is routed to the facility's discharge canal
(Outfall 003), the facility plans to reroute the effluent from this system to the LVWS.
Stormwater Runoff
The stormwater runoff which flows into the discharge canal includes runoff from the plant drainage
area, the drainage area from dry flyash handling system (including roadways, the landfill, and
the silo area), the fuel oil storage containment area, and the switchyard drainage area.
Outfall 006 - Coal Pile Runoff
Wastewater runoff from the coal pile and other coal handling areas of the plant is routed to a retention pond
for treatment by neutralization, sedimentation, and equalization. The pond is designed to store in excess
of the 10-year/24-hour storm event. Releases are controlled by a standpipe and skimmer discharge
structure.
UAjoanie\permit\wasstrm.rox 4

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Stormwatcr Runoff
Currently, a portion of the Unit 4 Cooling Tower drainage area flows into a catch basin which
discharges into the Hyco Reservoir (Enclosure 5). The catch basin contains an overflow line which
discharges into Outfall 003. Plans are to permanently alter the catch basin and to regrade the drainage
area so the stormwater flow from the area only discharges into the facility's discharge canal (Outfall
003).
U: \joanie\pemtit\wnsvm. mx
5

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Attachment 5
U: \jomie\permiAatt. rox

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharee Elimination Svstem Permit Number NC0003425
Attachment 5
Form 2C - Item VI Potential Discharges Not Covered By Analysis
Chemical
Quantity
(used r ear)
Frequency
Purpose
Ll
Betz Powerline 3200
385 gals.
As required
Corrosion Inhibitor
Betz Polymer 1120P
250 lbs.
As required
Water Treatment
Betz 3625 Biocide
2300 gals.
As required
Unit 4 Cooling Tower
Algae Control
Betz Foam Trol
630 gals.
As required
Unit 4 Cooling Tower
Foam Control
Betz 500P
110 gals.
Twice per day
Corrosion Inhibitor
Potable Water
Nalco 1250
550 gals.
As required
Feedwater Oxygen
Scavenger
Ice Free Conveyer
750 gals.
2100 lbs.
As required
Conveyer Belt Freeze
Protection
Aluminum Sulfate
4000 gals.
As required
Water Treatment
Sodium Chloride
100,000 lbs.
As required
Softener Regeneration
Sulfuric Acid
13,000 gals.
Twice per week
Demineralizer Regeneration
Sodium Hydroxide
15,000 gals.
Twice per week
Demineralizer Regeneration
Ethylene Glycol
6,000 gals.
As required
Freeze Protection Hot
Water Coil System
Lime
2,500 lbs.
As required
Wastewater pH Control
Hydrazine
1,760 gals.
As required
Feedwater Oxygen
Scavenger
Ammonia Hydroxide
1,760 gals.
As required
Boiler Water pH Control
Sodium Hydroxide
200 lbs.
As required
Boiler Water pH Control
Sodium Hypochlorite
400 gals.
Twice per day
Potable Water Treatment
Betz Powerline 2167
40, 000 lbs.
As required
Dust Suppressant
U:\joar ie\permit\chemical.rox

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Morpholine
220 gals.
As required
Boiler Water pH Control
Sodium Bicarbonate
10,000 lbs.
As required
Wastewater pH Control
Caustic Soda (20%)
110 gals.
Twice per day
Potable Water pH Control
Molten Sulfur
525,000 lbs.
As required
Flue Gas Conditioning
Sanuril Tablets
135 lbs.
As required
Biocide for Sewage
Treatment
Nalclean
200 lbs.
As required
Softened Water System
Wjmrn a\permit\chemical.rox

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Enclosure 2
Stormwater Group Application Correspondence
UAjoanie\p =Menc2.rox

CPU
Caronna Power d light Company
Director, Office of Water
Enforcement and Permits
Environmental Protection Agency
401 M. Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
RE: Group Application for Stormwater Discharges
Dear Sir or Madam:
This letter and enclosures are intended to serve as Part 1 of a group
application for a NPDES permit to discharge stormwater associated with industrial
activity as specified in 40 CFR 122. Specifically, the industrial facilities
addressed herein are six (6) steam electric generating plants owned and operated
by Carolina Power & Light Company (CP&L) in North Carolina and South Carolina.
Enclosed is the information required in 40 CFR 122.26(c)(2)(i) for Part 1
of the group application. This includes a list of the participating facilities,
a narrative description of their industrial activities and similarities, a list
of materials and management practices to minimize stormwater contamination, and
an explanation of why the specific facilities c%osen to provide quantitative data
for Part 2 are representative of the group as a whole.
Also enclosed is a copy of a letter from Mr. James Davis, Senior Vice
President, delegating authority to sign NPDES applications to the Manager of the
Environmental Services Section, the position that I currently hold.
It is CP&L's understanding that EPA intends to inform the Company within
60 days of the acceptability of these facilities for a group application. If you
require any further information, please contact Mr. Cam Wheeler at (919)
546-6725.
Yours very truly,
G. J. Oliver, Ph.D.
Manager
Environmental Services
CCW:dcs (91-O7.CCW)
Enclosures
cc: Mr. George Everett, N.C. Division of Environmental Management
Mr. Russ Sherer, S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control
41l Fayenevirle Street 0 F 0 Bcx 1551 • Raieig" N C 27602

CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
GROUP APPLICATION FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGE - PART 1
MARCH 1991
I. Participating Facilities
Rainfall Zone 2
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, Person County, North Carolina
Lat. 36' 19' Long. 79' 04'
Mayo Steam Electric Plant, Person County, North Carolina
Lat. 36' 32' Long. 78' 54'
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, Chatham County, North Carolina
Lat. 35' 34, Long. 79' 03'
Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Wake County, North Carolina
Lat. 35' 24' Long. 78' 58'
Rainfall Zone 3
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Brunswick County, North Carolina
Lat. 33' 57' Long. 78' 01'
Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Darlington County, South Carolina
Lat. 34' 24' Long. 80' 09'
II. Description of Facilities
All of the referenced facilities were built for and are operated by
Carolina Power & Light Company (CP&L) for the purpose of generating
electricity by using steam to power turbine generators. They are
sufficiently similar to have their waste water discharges be covered by a
single NPDES Effluent Guideline (40 CFR 423, Electric Power Generating

III
Facilities). With the exception of the method used to generate steam, the
equipment and processes used at each facility is essentially the same.
Heat for steam is generated either by nuclear reactor or by pulverized -
coal fired boilers. All are medium to large power plants with similar
land use and material handling practices, and storm water management
programs. Additional similarities are discussed in the following
sections. At every plant except Brunswick, the turbine building, which
includes the condenser, turbine -generator, and much of the water treatment
equipment, is the "open" design, which means that there is no roof or
walls surrounding most of the equipment. For the coal-fired plants, this
is also true of the boilers and fuel handling portions of the plants. For
the nuclear plants, the reactor building and other nuclear -related
buildings are, of course, completely enclosed. At all of CP&L's
facilities, but especially at the nuclear power plants, good housekeeping
is a high priority.
Materials and Manaeement Practices
Significant materials that may be stored exposed to precipitation:
A. Stored open and directly exposed:
Coal -fueled plants one All
Coal Machinery
Coal ash Piping
Valves
Scrap metal
Structural steel
B. Stored in open areas, but contained in closed steel or plastic
containers:
Hydrazine
Grease
Lubricating Oil
Sulfuric Acid
Sodium Chloride
Sodium Hydroxide
Chlorine gas
Herbicides
Sodium nitrate
Phosphates
Citric Acid
Sodium bicarbonate
Detergents
Sodium molybdate
Ethylene Glycol

C. Stored in open areas in stationary tanks, usually with secondary
containment:
Fuel oil Sulfuric Acid
Lubricating Oil Sodium Hydroxide
Boric Acid (nuclear only) Aluminum Sulfate
Ammonium Hydroxide
The material management practices at all CP&L facilities routinely include
best management practices to minimize contamination of land or water. With the
exception of coal and ash, all material potentially harmful to stormwater and
stored outside is kept enclosed or contained to prevent any but accidental
contact with precipitation.
Materials stored in bulk are usually in tanks with secondary containment
and with valve controlled drains so that stormwater can be routed to treatment
facilities if necessary.
Coal at coal-fired plants is kept in a coal pile and runoff from the pile
and related areas is subject to NPDES Effluent Guidelines (40 CFR 423). The
typical practice is to route all coal pile runoff to a retention pond for
equalization and sedimentation. Coal pile runoff is the only storm water
discharge from these facilities that is specifically addressed in the Effluent
Guidelines for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category.
Coal ash is typically stored in a sedimentation pond, where the runoff from
any exposed ash is drained to the active pond and treated along with the ash
transport water. At the one facility (Roxboro Plant) that stores ash by
landfill, that component of the facility storm water will be permitted separately
as a landfill with an individual application to N.C. Division of Environmental
Management, and is not included in this application.
Most significant materials stored exposed to stormwater are stored in their
original containers in a fenced and paved or graveled storage yard. These areas

are not easily accessible by vandals or other unauthorized persons and are
inspected regularly to minimize the chances of a significant undetected spill or
leak.
Various brands of commercial herbicides might be used to control weeds and
other unwanted plant growth on active industrial areas of the plant, storage
areas, and the plant perimeter for security reasons. If so, they are carefully
applied by licensed applicators in accordance with manufacturers instructions.
Fertilizers are applied only minimally on any of the active industrial areas of
these facilities.
IV. Participants to Provide Quantitative Data
SUMMARY OF PLANTS IN GROUP
Part 2
Size
Data
Plant
(MWe)
Fuel
Roxboro
2477
Coal
X
Mayo
705
Coal
X
Cape Fear
320
Coal
24
Qil"'
Harris
660
Nuclear
Brunswick
1580
Nuclear
X
Robinson
174
Coal
665
Nuclear
Stormwater"'
Treated mi
Untreated
N
(%)
30
70
40
60
90
10
Cooling
System
Once
Cooling
Through
Tower
X
X
X
X X
10
90
X
75
25
X
50
50
X
a) Percentages of stormwater treated or untreated prior to discharge are estimated
b) At virtually all of these plants, stormwater that is treated is also combined with other waste streams such as ash transport water
and/or low volume wastes and are treated in a retention/sedimentation basin.
c) At the Cape Fear Plant, some steam for electrical generation is produced by heat recovery boilers using exhaust from oil -fueled
internal combustion turbines. This system is usually operated for only 10-15 hours per year.
The above plants that are identified to provide quantitative data for Part 2 of
the group application (Mayo, Cape Fear, and Robinson) represent the entire range
of stormwater treatment methods of the total group. The storm drains for these
facilities drain areas that are very similar to others in the group in respect
to industrial activity and material handling practices. The types of other waste
streams combined with stormwater prior to discharge are also representative of
the group as a whole.
The Mayo Plant was chosen for quantitative data because it represents the plants

where most of the stormwater from the power block (boiler, turbine generator) is
discharged directly without treatment, as it also is at the Roxboro and Harris
Plants.
Quantitative data from the Cape Fear Plant will provide representative indication
of facilities where most stormwater discharges are treated by a retention or
sedimentation pond such as at portions of the Roxboro and Brunswick Plants. Mayo
and Cape Fear also represent the two-thirds of the group that are in Rainfall
Zone 2.
The Robinson Plant will represent the one-third of the group that is in Rainfall
Zone 3 and provide the quantitative data for South Carolina. In addition, it
represents the nuclear power facilities and those that have untreated stormwater
from material storage areas and other industrial activities other than the power
block.
(91-06.CCW)

CP"
Carolina vow.. A tight Company
P O Box 1551 • aaielgn N C 17602
MAR 2 3 1987
JAMES M. DAVIS, JR,
Senior Vice President
Fossil Generation &
Power Transmission
Mr. R. Paul Wilms, Director
N. C. Division of Environmental Management
P. 0. Box 27687
Raleigh, N. C. 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Wilms:
G
Serial No.: ESS-87-272
RE: NPDES PERMIT APPLICATIONS
DELEGATION OF SIGNATURE AUTHORITY
As allowed by the North Carolina Water Pollution Control Regulations,
Section .0106, "Filing Applications", I hereby designate the Manager of the
Environmental Services Section (ESS) as my duly authorized representative for
the purpose of signing Carolina Power & Light Company's (CP&L) NPDES permit
applications. The ESS Manager coordinates CP&L's non -radiological environmental
programs and directs requlatory, compliance, and monitorinq activities.
Currently, Mr. G. H. Warriner occupies this position.
This action is in concurrence with a telephone conversation with
Mr. Arthur Mouberry of the Permitting & Engineering Unit in which Mr. Mouberry
indicated that CP&L could assign this responsibility to the ESS manager.
Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
Mr. Warriner at [phone].
Yours very truly,
O;ioril l Si-r+rri bw
JAhls" M. DAVIS, JTL
J. M. Davis, Jr.

Cait ultina Power & Light Ca _ iany
Technical Services Department
411 Fayetteville Street Mall - P.O. Box 1551 - 4C3 CPB
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
AUG 1 4 1991
Director, Office of Wastewater
Enforcement and Compliance
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
ATTENTION: William F. Swietlik (EN-336)
RE: Storm Water Group Application No. 286
Additional Information for Part One
Dear Mr. Swietlik:
As requested in Mr. Ephraim King's letter of June 29, 1991, Carolina Power & Light
Company (CP&L) has compiled the additional information EPA requested to evaluate part one
of our group application and that information is enclosed.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact
Mr. Cam Wheeler at [phone] in our General Office.
Yours very truly,
G. J. Oliver, Ph.D.
Manager
Environmental Services
CCW:dcs (91-14.CCW)
Enclosures

CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
STORM WATER DISCHARGE GROUP APPLICATION
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR PART ONE
This information was prepared at the request of EPA in a letter to G. J. Oliver dated
June 29, 1991, and is intended to supplement information provided in CP&L's original Part One
application dated March 14, 1991. This information covered herein addresses only those items
specifically requested by EPA on June 29.
Exhibit 1 is a list of group participants that gives the mailing and location address for each
participant.
Exhibit 2 is a matrix of significant materials stored outside by each participant. In comparison
to CP&L's submittal of March 14, 1991, sodium nitrate and boric acid are no longer
identified, as they are now stored inside. Morphaline and PCB's have been added.
Exhibit 3 is a matrix of material and storm water management practices employed by each
participant.
Exhibit 4 is an additional explanation of why facilities conducting sampling are representative
of the group, specifically in terms of significant materials and management practices.

EXHIBIT I
GROUP APPLICATION PARTICIPANTS
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
Person County Road 1377
P.O. Box 1238
Roxboro, NC 27573
Mayo Steam Electric Plant
Route 5, Highway 501 North
P.O. Drawer C
Roxboro, NC 27573
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
Chatham County Road 1916
P.O. Box 229
Moncure, NC 27559
(91-14.CCW)
Harris Nuclear Power Plant
Wake County Road 1134
P.O. Box 165
New Hill, NC 27562
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant
N.C. Highway 87
P.O. Box 10429
Southport, NC 28461
Robinson Steam Electric Plant
S.C. Highways 151 and 23
P.O. Box 790
Hartsville, SC 29550

EXHIBIT 2
SIGNIFICANT MATERIALS STORED OUTSIDE
Facill
A
I B
I C I
D
I E
I F
I G
I H
I
I J
I K
I L
I M
I N
1 O
fTQ
R
S
T
U
V
W
Roxboro x
x x
x x
x
x x x x x x
x x x x x
Mayo x
x x
x
x
x x x x
x x x
Cape Fear x
x x
x x
x
x x x x x
x x x
Harris
x
x x
x
x x x x x x
x x
Brunswick
x
x
x
x x x x
x
Robinson x
x x
x x
x
x x x x x x x
x x x x x
A
= Coal
B
= Coal Ash
C
= Machinery
D
= Hydrazine
E
= Grease
F
= Lubricating Oil
G
= Sulfuric Acid
H
= Sodium Chloride
(91-14.CCW)
I = Sodium Hydroxide
J = Chlorine Gas
K = Herbicides
L = Morphaline
M = Phosphates
N = Citric Acid
O = Sodium Bicarbonate
P = Detergents
Q = Sodium Molybdate
R = Ethylene Glycol
S = Fuel Oil
T = Sodium Hypochlorite
U = Aluminum Sulfate
V = Ammonium Hydroxide
W = Polychlorinated Biphenols

EXHIBIT 3
Material/Stormwater Management Practices
Facility
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Roxboro
X
X
X
X
X
X
Mayo
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Cape Fear
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Harris
X
X
X
X
X
X
Brunswick
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Robinson
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
KEY
A = covered storage
B = housekeeping of storage areas
C = sealed containers
D = secondary containment
E = retention/sedimentation basins
F = catch basins
G = access control

EXHIBIT 4
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
SIGNIFICANT MATERIAL PROPORTIONS
Number of
%
Number of
Samples
%
Coal
—Participants
4
67
3
100
Coal Ash
4
67
3
100
Machinery
6
100
3
100
Hydrazine
4
67
2
67
Grease
6
100
3
100
Lubricating Oil
6
100
3
100
Sulfuric Acid
4
67
3
100
Sodium Chloride
4
67
1
33
Sodium Hydroxide
2
33
1
33
Chlorine Gas
4
67
2
67
Herbicides
4
67
2
67
Phosphates
1
17
0
0
Citric Acid
4
67
3
100
Sodium Bicarbonate
2
33
1
33
Detergents
6
100
3
100
Sodium Molb date
2
33
1
33
Ethe lene Glycol
4
67
3
100
Fuel Oil
6
100
3
100
Sodium H ochlorite
1
17
1
33
Aluminum Sulfate
1
50
0
0
Ammonium Hydroxide
3
50
2
67
1
17
1
33
-Morphaline
PCBs
1
17
1
33

Exhibit 4 (Continued)
Since all facilities in this group are in the same Standard Industrial Category
(SIC 4299), and part of the same company, they are very similar in terms of significant
materials and storm water management practices. The primary difference in significant
materials would be due to the type of fuel used, with coal-fired plants having the most
material stored outside and exposed to storm water. With the exception of retention
basins, all facilities in the group have common types of storage and management practices
as demonstrated in Exhibit 3. All of the sampling facilities have some outfalls that are
treated by retention basins and some that are not. Outfalls that are treated by retention
basins and those that are untreated are both represented in the sampling group in
approximately the same proportion as the group as a whole. All three of the facilities in
the sampling group have coal-fired generation. The Robinson Plant has both coal and
nuclear fueled generation and represents the nuclear facilities. There are no significant
materials or management practices that are unique to the nuclear plants as a group. The
Cape Fear Plant is the only facility that stores PCB's or morphaline and it is included in
the sampling group.
The only facility that stores aluminum sulfate (alum) outside is the Roxboro Plant, which
is not an identified sampler. The only facility that stores phosphates outside is the Harris
Plant, which is not an identified sampler. The reasons for this are:
1) Most of the Roxboro Plant's yard drain outfalls (including the ones that drain the area
around the alum tank) as well as the inverts of the most downstream manholes, are
submerged at all times. This makes accurate sampling and flow measurements extremely
difficult.
2) The Harris Plant has a relatively large number of smaller outfalls that would cause the
cost of sampling to greatly exceed that do- at other facilities. In addition, because the
Harris Plant is CP&L's newest facility and a nuclear plant, it is not as likely to have
significant quantities of pollutants in its storm water runoff.
3) These materials at both facilities are stored in bulk tanks and deliveries are made by
tanker truck; the material is always handled and stored in a closed system. Even though
the tank and delivery system are outside, and therefore listed here, the material itself is not
directly exposed to storm water.
4) Because of the active nature of the facilities and frequent observations by operations
personnel, it is extremely unlikely that any leak or spill of these materials would go
undetected or unrepaired. Additionally, it would be even less likely that any such material
would find its way to a yard drain during the limited monitoring period of this permit
application process.
Because of the sampling difficulty referenced above, the very remote chances of storm
water contamination by the single unique material, and the more appropriate choice of
sampling at other, more representative facilities, these two facilities (Roxboro and Harris)
are not included in the sampling group.

Caroiina Power & Light Company
Technical Services Department
411 Fayetteville Street Mall, CPB 3A2
P.O. Box 1551
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Director, Office of Wastewater Enforcement
and Compliance
U.S. EPA
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
ATTN: William F. Swietlik (EN-336)
RE: Storm Water Group Application No. 286
Submittal of Part 2
Dear Mr. Swietlik:
Enclosed is Part 2 of Carolina Power & Light Company's group application for
storm water discharge. Included are copies of EPA Forms 1, 2C, and the required
portions of 2F for the three facilities that were selected to provide samples for the
group of six. The sampling facilities included are:
Sampler #1 Mayo Steam Electric Plant
Sampler #2 Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
Sampler #3 Robinson Steam Electric Plant
In addition, there is a map of each sampling facility and narrative descriptions
of the storm water outfalls, as well as a categorization of outfalls from these facilities
with a discussion of the need for monitoring requirements for each category that may
be of use to EPA in preparing a model permit.

William' F. Swietlik 2
If you have any questions regarding this application, please contact Mr. Cam
Wheeler at [phone].
Very truly yours,
George J. Oliver, Ph.D.
Manager
Environmental Services
M.
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Russ Sherer, SC Department of Health and Environmental Control
Ms. Coleen Sullins, NC Division of Environmental Management

CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Storm Water Group Application No. 286
PROPOSED MODEL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
OUTFALL CATEGORIES
Storm water outfalls from CP&L's steam electric generating plants can be grouped into
four distinct categories, as summarized below:
Category I: Runoff Combined with Cooling Water Flow
In this case, runoff from power plant site areas of industrial activity is
combined with once -through cooling water prior to reaching an outfall to
waters of the United States. In such instances, the cooling water flow
(typically ranging from 280 to 2000 cubic feet per second) is water
essentially unaltered from the receivi_.g stream, except for the addition of
heat, and would mask any measurable pollutants that may be added
by runoff.
Category II: Runoff Combined with Plant Low Volume Wastes or Ash Transport
Water and Treated by Retention Ponds
Several plant drains collect storm water from selected areas of the site,
usually under or immediately surrounding industrial equipment or
activities. This storm water is then conveyed, either by gravity or forced
main, to a retention/sedimentation facility designed to treat miscellaneous
process wastewater from the plant. Tbese "design wastes" usually contain
higher levels of any pollutants prior to treatment than the storm water
alone, and the range of expected pollutants can be expected to be very
similar to any in the storm water; therefore, the treatment facility can be
expected to also provide pollutant removal treatment of storm water. The
treatment facilities are usually basins such as ash ponds that have several
days or months of retention time, even at anticipated maximum flow rates.
Category III: Direct Runoff from Major Industrial Activity Areas
Some outfalls drain the main plant yards near major process facilities and,
aside from catch basins or swales, receive no other significant treatment
prior to discharge to surface waters. Good housekeeping and BMPs are
the primary storm water pollution controls.
1

Category IV: Runoff from Areas of Minimal Industrial Activity
Some runoff is produced from areas of a steam electric generating plant
site that can be technically considered areas of industrial activity, but
represent little or no threat to water quality from storm water runoff
because of small surface area, low runoff coefficient, and/or little or no
direct exposure of significant material to rainfall (mostly roofs or
infrequently used pavement).
The following table identifies the sampled outfalls in the referenced categories:
Plant Outfall No. Cateeory
Mayo (sampler 1) 1 II
2 IV
3 III
4 III
5 IV
Cape Fear (sampler 2) 1 I (includes II and IV components)
2 II
3 IV
4 II
Robinson (sampler 3) 1 II (includes III and IV components)
The unsampled facilities in this group contain the following categories of outfalls:
Plant
Harris
Roxboro
Brunswick
PROPOSED SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS
Categories
III and IV
I, III, and IV
I (includes II components) and IV
CP&L suggests that a storm water pollution prevention plan similar to that specified
in EPA's general permit might be the primary component of a model storm water discharge
permit, and that any regular sampling of storm water discharges is not necessary. Because
2

of significant dilution or mixing/retention, sampling of outfalls in Category I and II would
not detect any measurable pollutants from storm water runoff, even if they existed.
Certification of an outfall as Category IV by the permittee or by a suitable professional,
subject to possible verification by a local or state regulator by site visit, should make any
sampling of these outfalls unnecessary because of negligible threat to water quality.
Category III outfalls have the greatest potential for storm water contamination, but
normally practiced BMPs, good housekeeping procedures, and other components of a
pollution prevention plan should provide acceptable protection for the receiving water
body. Nuclear plant sites in particular are exceptionally careful with housekeeping and
material handling practices.
1<

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Enclosure 3
Site Stormwater Drainage Map and Area Descriptions
U:\jonnie\permit\enc3. rox

NTAK
FOKSAY
qjj �
a/ \ R s as
sw
PAANNO
AWO
Sw 1s
MIBASIN
sw
DRY ASH LANDFILL
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
Person County, N. C.
Stormwater Area Descriptions
Page 1 of 4 October 1996

NYCO
LAN[
SW 4
Culm
slothm
SW 3
I �L11(XOUBC I e _`
SW 2
Fol
SW 6 �
SW 7
C6CKA0[
CANAL
5
<MT �j 0 3
ri
COAL PU
LMT
02
C

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Enclosure 3
Stormwater Area Descriptions
Stormwater Discharge (SW) 1
The drainage area is composed of a warehouse and the grassy landscape surrounding the
warehouse. Runoff would consist of roof top runoff from the warehouse and surface runoff from
the warehouse building area.
Stormwater Discharge (SW) 2
The drainage area consists of a portion of the unit 4 cooling tower area. Runoff would consist
of surface runoff from the cooling tower and its appurtenances.
Stormwater Discharge (SVII) 3
The drainage area consists of a portion of the unit 4 cooling tower area. Runoff would consist
of surface runoff from the cooling tower and its appurtenances.
Stormwater Discharge (SW) 4
The drainage area is composed of a roadway. Runoff consists of roadside drainage.
Stormwater Discharge (SW) 5
The drainage area is composed of an exterior inventory storage area and laydown area. Runoff
is directed by sheet flow to ditches which discharge into NPDES Outfall 006.
Stormwater Discharge (SW) 6
The drainage area consists of roadways, a portion of the railroad track, and the sewage treatment
plant. Runoff would consist of roadside and railroad drainage and surface runoff from the
sewage treatment plant.
Stormwater Discharge (SW) 7
The drainage area is composed of a warehouse, the area surrounding the warehouse, roadways,
U:\jo ie\pe=iAswdew.rox 2

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
and a parking lot. Runoff would consist of roof top runoff from the warehouse, surface runoff
from the warehouse building area, roadside and parking lot drainage.
Stormwater Discharge (SW) 8
The area consists of the power block of the generating facility and the associated equipment.
Runoff consists of surface runoff from the facility equipment, buildings, roads, sidewalks, etc.
Stormwater Discharge (SW) 9
The drainage area is composed of the switchyard. Runoff is directed by sheet flow to the
discharge canal, NPDES Outfall 036.
Stormwater Discharge (SW) 10
The area consists of the power block of the generating facility and the associated equipment.
Runoff consists of surface runoff from the facility equipment, buildings, roads, sidewalks, etc.
Stormwater Discharge (SW) 11
The area consists of the power block of the generating facility and the associated equipment.
Runoff consists of surface runoff from the facility equipment, buildings, roads, sidewalks, etc.
Stormwater Discharge (SW) 12
The area consists of the power block of the generating facility and the associated equipment.
Runoff consists of surface runoff from the facility equipment, buildings, roads, sidewalks, etc.
Stormwater Discharge (SVvF) 13
The area consists of the containment area for the fuel oil storage tank. Runoff consists of surface
runoff from the tank. The release of this stormwater is controlled by facility personnel.
Stormwater Discharge (SW) 14
The drainage area is composed of a roadway. Runoff consists of roadside drainage.
U:\joanie\permit\swdew.mx 3

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Stormwater Discharge (SW) 15
The drainage area is composed of the roadway which leads to and from the dry ash landfill.
Runoff consists of roadside drainage.
Stormwater Discharge (SW) 16
The drainage area is composed of the roadway which leads to and from the dry ash landfill and
from a small substation. Runoff consists of roadside drainage and surface runoff from the
substation.
Stormwater Discharge (SW) 17
The drainage area is a small substation. Runoff consists of surface runoff from the substation.
UAjoanie\permi6swdm. rox 4

r
CP&L
Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Electric Generating Plant
PO Box 1238
Roxboro NC 27573
File: 12520 A
Mr. Kenneth Schuster
Raleigh Regional Supervisor
North Carolina Division Of
Environmental Management
3800 Barrett Drive
Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27602
Subject: Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit No. NC0003425
Dear Mr. Schuster:
John J. Carney
Plant Manager
April 12, 1996
In accordance with Part II, E (9) ( c ) of the above -referenced NPDES Permit, on April 10,
1996 Mr. Ted Cashion of the Raleigh Regional Office of the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management was notified via telephone by Ms. Joanie Cooke of CP&L's
Environmental Services Section that a discharge of ash water to Outfall 003 (Heated Water
Discharge Canal) had occurred at the Roxboro Steam Electric Plant (Grade II facility) in Person
County.
On April 9, 1996, plant personnel discovered a leak at a coupling in a wastewater line (ash
transport water line) that was discharging ash water via a ditch into the heated water discharge
canal. Upon discovery, the discharge was immediately stopped and the coupling repaired.
Approximately 1,000 gallons were discharged during the event. CP&L believes that the
discharge from the damaged coupling contributed an imperceptible impact on the discharge at
Outfall 003 since, i) all flow from the subject discharge was co -mingled with the effluent from
Outfall 003 prior to discharge to surface waters, and ii) the discharge contributed a relatively
small amount to the final volume of Outfall 003, which discharges approximately 1 billion
gallons per day. Recurrence is highly unlikely. No harm to the environment or human health
occurred during or after the discharge.
Hwy 57 North Tel [phone] Fax [phone]

-2
If you have any questions or comments regarding this information, please contact Ms. Joanie
Cooke at [phone] or Mr. Ronnie Wolfe at [phone].
Sincerely,
John J. Carney
Plant Manager
RWW:kj
LAB/OUTFALL
Enclosur
c: 7s. J. E. Garrett (Raleigh Regional Office - NCDEM)
Mr. T. Cashion (Raleigh Regional Office - NCDEM)
Hwy 57 North Tel [phone] Fax [phone]

e
C P&L
Carolina Power & Light Company _ John J. Carney
Roxboro Electric Generating Plant �I �j) i— Plant Manager
PO Box 1238
Roxboro NC 27573 !r
File: 12520 A OFFICE April 12, 1996
Mr. Kenneth Schuster
Raleigh Regional Supervisor
North Carolina Division Of
Environmental Management
3800 Barrett Drive
Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27602
Subject: Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit No. NC0003425
Dear Mr. Schuster:
In accordance with Part II, E (9) ( c ) of the above -referenced NPDES Permit, on April 10,
1996 Mr. Ted Cashion of the Raleigh Regional Office of the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management was notified via telephone by Ms. loanie Cooke of CP&L's
Environmental Services Section that a discharge of ash water to Outfall 003 (Heated Water
Discharge Canal) had occurred at the Roxboro Steam Electric Plant (Grade U facility) in Person
County.
On April 9, 1996, plant personnel discovered a leak at a coupling in a wastewater line (ash
transport water line) that was discharging ash water via a ditch into the heated water discharge
canal. Upon discovery, the discharge was immediately stopped and the coupling repaired.
Approximately 1,000 gallons were discharged during the event. CP&L believes that the
discharge from the damaged coupling contributed an imperceptible impact on the discharge at
Outfall 003 since, i) all flow from the subject discharge was co -mingled with the effluent from
Outfall 003 prior to discharge to surface waters, and ii) the discharge contributed a relatively
small amount to the final volume of Outfall 003, which discharges approximately I billion
gallons per day. Recurrence is highly unlikely. No harm to the environment or human health
occurred during or after the discharge.
Hwy 57 North Tel [phone] Fax [phone]

-2-
If you have any questions or comments regarding this information, please contact Ms. Joanie
Cooke at [phone] or Mr. Ronnie Wolfe at [phone].
Sincerely,
John J. Carney
Plant Manager
RWW:kj
LAB/OUTFALL
Enclosure
c: Ms. J. E. Garrett (Raleigh Regional Office - NCDEM)
Mr. T. Cashion (Raleigh Regional Office - NCDEM)
Hwy 57 North Tel [phone] Fax [phone]

Hol
Carolina Power & light Company
Roxboro Electric Generating Plant
PO Box 1238
Roxboro NC 27573
File: 12520 A
Mr. Kenneth Schuster
Raleigh Regional Supervisor
North Carolina Division Of
Environmental Management
3800 Barrett Drive
Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27602
l
_.,NttRl`
Subject: Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit No. NC0003425
Dear Mr. Schuster:
John J. Carney
Plant Manager
April 12, 1996
In accordance with Part II, E (9) ( c ) of the above -referenced NPDES Permit, on April 10,
1996 Mr. Ted Cashion of the Raleigh Regional Office of the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management was notified via telephone by Ms. Joanie Cooke of CP&L's
Environmental Services Section that a discharge of ash water to Outfall 003 (Heated Water
Discharge Canal) had occurred at the Roxboro Steam Electric Plant (Grade II facility) in Person
County.
On April 9, 1996, plant personnel discovered a leak at a coupling in a wastewater line (ash
transport water line) that was discharging ash water via a ditch into the heated water discharge
canal. Upon discovery, the discharge was immediately stopped and the coupling repaired.
Approximately 1,000 gallons were discharged during the event. CP&L believes that the
discharge from the damaged coupling contributed an imperceptible impact on the discharge at
Outfall 003 since, i) all flow from the subject discharge was co -mingled with the effluent from
Outfall 003 prior to discharge to surface waters, and ii) the discharge contributed a relatively
small amount to the final volume of Outfall 003, which discharges approximately 1 billion
gallons per day. Recurrence is highly unlikely. No harm to the environment or human health
occurred during or after the discharge.
Hwy 57 North Tel [phone] Fax [phone]

-2-
If you have any questions or comments regarding this information, please contact Ms. Joanie
Cooke at [phone] or Mr. Ronnie Wolfe at [phone].
Sincerely,
John J. Carney
Plant Manager
RWW:kj
LAB/OUTFALL
Enclosure
c: Ms. J. E. Garrett (Raleigh Regional Office - NCDEM)
Mr. T. Cashion (Raleigh Regional Office - NCDEM)
Hwy 57 North Tel [phone] Fax [phone]

State of North Carol,,,.
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
1�
EDFEE HNR
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
March 28, 1996
John Carney, Manager, Environmental Services
Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Generating Plant
Post Office Box 1238
Roxboro, North Carolina 27573
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Roxboro Electric Plant WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0003425
Person County
Dear Mr. Carney:
On March 27,1996, Mr. Steve Mitchell, of the Raleigh Regional
Office, conducted a compliance evaluation inspection of the subject
facility. The assistance of Mr. Ronald Wolfe and Ms. Joanie Cooke
is appreciated. The following recommendations and/or comments are
the result of Mr. Mitchell's inspection:
1. The grounds and the facility appeared well maintained and
operated.
2. There are five permitted discharge pipes under the current
permit. Pipe 002 is the ash settling pond, 003 is the heated
water discharge canal, 005 is cooling tower water blowdown,
006 is the coal pile run-off discharge, and 008 is the
wastewater treatment plant. Pipe 009 was the discharge from
chemical metal cleaning but has been deleted from the permit.
3. The discharge from the ash pond (002) appeared clear and
free of excess solids.
4. There was no discharge from the WWTP (008) as the package
plant was taken out of service for study.
5. You are reminded
at least annually to
requirements.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Voice 919-571-4700
that the flow meter is to be calibrated
be in compliance with the Division's
N%`; FAX 914718
■�J. An Equal Opportunity Affffirmairmative Action Employer
�g�® 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

t Page Two
Roxboro
6. The solids generated by the package plant are disposed of
in the ash pond.
7. A review of the self monitoring data for a one year period
from December 1994 to November 1996, indicated compliance with
the permit. The facility is monitoring for all parameters
and locations as specified in the permit. Bench sheets, log
books, DMR's, etc. indicate that this data is being properly
recorded and transmitted to DEM.
8. Field parameter analyses are completed on site and the
remaining chemical analyses is accomplished at the Energy and
Environmental Center at Shearon Harris and through outside
laboratories.
9. The ORC's log book was accurate and up to date.
If you have any questions regarding this inspection, or if you need
additional information, please call Mr. Mitchell or Mr. Ted Cashion
at 919-571-4700.
Sincerely,
E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Person County Health Department
Joanie Cooke, CP&L

States Environmental Protection Agency
A Washington, D. C. 2O6a0
Form Approved
V_V E PA NPDES Compliance Inspection Report
P P P
OMB No. 20
fires 7-3
Approval Expires 7-31-85
Section A: National Data System Coding
Transaction Code PDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type _ . Inspector Fac Type
t'J 4J 31A11�-Ibl0l 131y1a15111
1�SIG1�131�18117 tee t9U 2cLI
Remarks .
=
Reserved �� Facility Evaluation Rating BI CIA ------------------- Reserved ................. 66
6tj_iJ 69 7d,51 71M 72WJ 7J_Lj74 751 1 1 1 1 80
Section B: Facility Data
Name an Location o Facility Inspected
l4-L rkOK1e3ole6
Entry Time
i//5 ❑AM❑PM
Permit Effe ive Date
G///SY
S Z % 3 T r
till) a
Exit Time/Date
/ //[S
Permit Expiration Date
J S�
O rJ
Y s J
ame(s) o n- tteRepresentative(s)
�Z�L?'1A1T1� C1i>01C
Title(s)
Phone No(s)
Y'
Zell L) C)L1� 6
S c�-J �1 ASS T
Name, Address of Responsible Official
,j c7n %) C_ R1ZN t—/
l } �U �`�6?-3
Title
A /}1J ac elb J , SE.'1?
Phone No. [,
Contacte
Y" rip
o
❑ Yes No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection
IS = Satisfactory, M = Marginal, U = Unsatisfactory, N = Not Evaluated)
5'
Permit
Records/Reports
Facility Site Review
AJ
Flow Measurement
Laboratory
Effluent/Receiving Waters
Ni
Pretreatment
Compliance Schedules
Self -Monitoring Program -
5
Operations & Maintenance
Sludge Disposal
Other:
$
R f
S
S
S
His
Section D: Summary of Findings/Comments /Attach additional sheets if necessary/
aiatz
and Signature(s) f Insp ctorls)
Agency/Office/Telephone
Date
J�rn ? �� S/s- s��-�� �y'
308A�
Signature of Reviewer
Agency/Office
Date
jV'M o
9O3d P
Re uletory Office Use Only
Action Taken
Date
Compliance Status
❑�Npitcompliance
i3JyCom liance
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev. 3-85) Previous editions are obsolete.

State of North Carol..,.
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Ralelgh Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
WA
IDEHNFR
[�,t,a yS hfle /'
pDIVIISIO/N OF QVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
May
N
John Carney, Manager, Environmental Services �1
Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Steam Electric Generating Plant (h C
Post Office Box 1238 d
Roxboro, North Carolina 27573
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Roxboro Electric Plant WWTP /j��
NPDES Permit No. NC0003425
Person County
Dear Mr. Carney:
1!F
On March 27,1996, Mr. Steve Mitchell, of the Raleigh Regional
Office, conducted a compliance evaluation inspection of the subject
facility. The assistance of Mr. Ronald Wolfe and Ms. Joanie Cooke
is appreciated. The following recommendations and/or comments are
the result of Mr. Mitchell's inspection:
1. The grounds and the facility appeared well maintained and
operated.
2. There are five permitted discharge pipes under the current
permit. Pipe 002 is the ash settling pond, 003 is the heated
water discharge canal, 005 is cooling tower water blowdown,
006 is the coal pile run-off discharge, and 008 is the
wastewater treatment plant. Pipe 009 was the discharge from
chemical metal cleaning but has been deleted from the permit.
3. The discharge from the ash pond (002) appeared clear and
free of excess solids.
4. There was no discharge from the WWTP (008) as the package
plant was taken out of service for study.
5. You are reminded that the flow meter is to be calibrated
at least annually to be in compliance with the Division's
requirements.
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101, �� FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609 N :� C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-571-4700 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Page Two
Roxboro
6. The solids generated by the package plant are disposed of
in the ash pond.
7. A review of the self monitoring data for a one year period
from December 1994 to November 1996, indicated compliance with
the permit. The facility is monitoring for all parameters
and locations as specified in the permit. Bench sheets, log
books, DMR's, etc. indicate that this data is being properly
recorded and transmitted to DEM.
8. Field parameter analyses are completed on site and the
remaining chemical analyses is accomplished at the Energy and
Environmental Center at Shearon Harris and through outside
laboratories.
9. The ORC's log book was accurate and up to date.
If you have any questions regarding this inspection, or if you need
additional information, please call Mr. Mitchell or Mr. Ted Cashion
at 919-571-4700.
Sincerely,
Judy E. Garrett
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Person County Health Department
Joanie Cooke, CP&L

Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Electric Generating Plant
PO Box 1238
Roxboro NC 27573
File: 12520-B
Mr. Kenneth Schuster
Raleigh Regional Supervisor
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
3800 Barnett Drive
Suite 101
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
John J. Carney
Plant Manager
Aji it 16, 1996
v
Subject: Carolina Power & Light Company (CP&L)
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No.
NC0003425
Dear Mr. Schuster:
Pursuant to the April 11, 1996 telephone conversation between Randy Jones of Raleigh Regional
Office of NCDEM and Joanie Cooke of CP&L, this letter provides the documentation of the
above -referenced facility's routing an disposal of a temporary wastewater stream.
The facility pressure washed two gantry cranes located on site. High pressure water with no
additives was used for the cleaning process. Thus, the wastewater stream from the pressure
washing contained only the used washing water. Any solids removed during the cleaning were
filtered out of the waste stream. The waste wash water was treated as a low volume waste and
routed through the low volume system with final discharge into the ash pond. In addition, the
waste wash water was tested prior to the routing through the low volume and ash pond systems
to ensure no effluent limitations would be affected by the introduction of temporary waste
stream into the systems.
Please contact Ms. Joanie Cooke at [phone] or Mr. Ronnie Wolfe at (9b9) 597-6246
with any questions you may have regarding this information.
Sincerely,
John J. Carney
Plant Manager
RWW:mp
LAB/NPDES3425
cc. Ms. J. E. Garrett (Raleigh Regional Office - NCDEM)
Mr. R. Jones (Raleigh Regional Office - NCDEM) r
Hwy 57 North Tel [phone] Fax [phone]

APR 16 '% 01:12PM OPEPOTTONS & ENVIRONMENT SUPPORT
P.1
To:
Fax #:
From;
FAX TRANSMISSION
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
4 1 2 S. WILMINGTON ST, MAIL CODE OHS 1 OC4
RALEIGH, NORTH CARouJ 27801
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
Randy Jones - NCDEM Date: April 16, 1996
919-571-4718 Pages: 2, including this cover sheet.
Joanie P. Cooke - CP&L
Subject: CP&L Roxboro Plant NPDES Permit No. NC0003425
COMMENTS:
Randy,
Attached is a draft of the letter that will be submitted by the facility to the Regional Office as per
our discussion. If you have any questions or concerns please contact me at [phone].
Thanks for all the help.

APR 16 '96 01:12PM OPFRATZONS & ENVIRONMENT SUPPORT
P.2
File No.:
Mr. Kenneth Schuster
Raleigh Regional Supervisor
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
3800 Barrett Drive
Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27602
Subject: Carolina Power & Light Company (CP&L)
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. NC0003425
Dear Mr. Schuster:
Pursuant to the April 11, 1996 telephone conversation between Randy Jones of the Raleigh Regional
Office of NCDEM and Joanie Cooke of CP&L, this letter provides the documentation of the above -
referenced facility's touting and disposal of a temporary wastewater stream.
The facility pressured washed a gantry crane located on -site. High pressure water with no additives
was used for the cleaning process. Thus, the wastewater stream from the pressure washing contained
only the used washing water. Any solids removed during the cleaning were filtered out of the waste
stream. The waste wash water was treated as a low volume waste and routed through the low volume
system with final discharge into the ash pond. In addition, the waste wash water was tested prior to
the routing through the low volume and ash pond systems to ensure no effluent limitations would be
affected by the introduction temporary waste stream into the systems.
Please contact Ms. Joanie Cooke at [phone] or Mr. Ronnie Wolfe at [phone] with
any questions you may have regarding this information.
Yours very truly,
J. J. Carney
Manager - Roxboro Plant
JPC/jpC (u:\jw kri Pdeslmxwash.496)
c: Ms. J. E. Garrett (Raleigh Regional Office - NCDEM)
Mr. R. Jones (Raleigh Regional Office - NCDEM)

CP&L
Carolina Power & Light Company
Roxboro Electric Generating Plant
PO Box 1238
Roxboro NC 27573
File No.: 12520 A 7t�
iI1U1 MAR 1819°.1�
Mr. Kenneth Schuster
Raleigh Regional Supervisor ENNR RAIE�GH F't'
North Carolina Division of Environmental Manage
3800 Barrett Drive
Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27602
John J. Carney
Plant Manager
Subject: Carolina Power & Light Company (CP&L)
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. NC0003425
Dear Mr. Schuster:
On March 28, 1996, the above -referenced facility plans to perform a maintenance study on the
sewage treatment plant at the facility. The maintenance study is necessary to determine type and
extent of essential maintenance required on the sewage treatment plant to assure continued
efficient operation. In order to perform the study, the sewage treatment plant will have to be
drained and will remain empty for an estimated four days. The facility proposes to route the
influent of the plant to Outfall 002 - the Ash Settling Pond while the maintenance study is
performed. Under normal operating conditions the effluent from the sewage treatment plant
discharges to Outfall 002. None of the effluent limitations for Outfall 002 are expected to be
exceeded during the rerouting. In addition, the facility will obtain daily Biochemical Oxygen
Demand samples during the rerouting and report the results as an attachment to the monthly
discharge monitoring report for Outfall 002. In the event that the sewage treatment plant will
need to remain drained for longer than four days, the facility will discontinue routing the
influent to outfall 002 and will implement the routing of the influent through an existing septic
tank system, not currently not in use, at the facility.
In accordance with Part II, C 4 (b) of the above -referenced NPDES Permit, a "bypass not
exceeding limitations" is allowed for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation. Thus,
the proposed bypass of treatment for the facility is allowed based on i) the rerouting will be
performed for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation (maintenance study) and ii) no
Outfall 002 effluent limitations are expected to be exceeded. Since the date of the maintenance
is March 28, 1996, a verbal confirmation of the acceptance of the bypass by the Raleigh
Regional Office of NCDEM would be appreciated.
Hwy 57 North Tel [phone] Fax [phone]

Mr. Kenneth Schuster 2
Please contact Ms. Joanie Cooke in Raleigh at [phone] with the confirmation or with any
questions you may have regarding this information.
Yours very truly,
John J. Carney
Manager - Roxboro PI t
JPC/jpC (u:\joanie\npdes\roxbypas.396)
c: Ms. J. E. Garrett (Raleigh Regional Office - NCDEM)
p p �
1 03 11 L e7C� ✓o, ce wa,`l r oa0,I e Cuole
O�t7`,// Doti � �/ �(
�GrI w�,�e Glo,�S wIG nl£n/rnCe S%r,0l
Hwy 57 North Tel [phone] Fax [phone]

CP&L
Carolina Power & Light Company V tr
Roxboro Electric Generating Plant
PO Box 1238 '
Roxboro NC 27573 tU JfrmrC
File No.: 12520 A
Mr. Kenneth Schuster
prortl
a
c,.l«-96031`I
Raleigh Regional Supervisor
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
3800 Barrett Drive
Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27602
Subject: Carolina Power & Light Company (CP&L)
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
r '
I, et" -fir ,
John J. Carney
Plant Manager
7P11
�
girt,
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. NC0003425
Dear Mr. Schuster:
On March 28, 1996, the above -referenced facility plans to perform a maintenance study on the
sewage treatment plant at the facility. The maintenance study is necessary to determine type and
extent of essential maintenance required on the sewage treatment plant to assure continued
efficient operation. In order to perform the study, the sewage treatment plant will have to be
drained and will remain empty for an estimated four days. The facility proposes to route the
influent of the plant to Outfall 002 - the Ash Settling Pond while the maintenance study is
performed. Under normal operating conditions the effluent from the sewage treatment plant
discharges to Outfall 002. None of the effluent limitations for Outfall 002 are expected to be
exceeded during the rerouting. In addition, the facility will obtain daily Biochemical Oxygen
Demand samples during the rerouting and report the results as an attachment to the monthly
discharge monitoring report for Outfall 002. In the event that the sewage treatment plant will
need to remain drained for longer than four days, the facility will discontinue routing the
influent to outfall 002 and will implement the routing of the influent through an existing septic
tank system, not currently not in use, at the facility.
In accordance with Part H, C 4 (b) of the above -referenced NPDES Permit, a "bypass not
exceeding limitations" is allowed for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation. Thus,
the proposed bypass of treatment for the facility is allowed based on i) the rerouting will be
performed for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation (maintenance study) and ii) no
Outfall 002 effluent limitations are expected to be exceeded. Since the date of the maintenance
is March 28, 1996, a verbal confirmation of the acceptance of the bypass by the Raleigh
Regional Office of NCDEM would be appreciated.
Hwy 57 North Tel [phone] Fax [phone]

Mr. Kenneth Schuster 2
Please contact Ms. Joanie Cooke in Raleigh at [phone] with the confirmation or with any
questions you may have regarding this information.
Yours very truly,
John J. Carney
Manager -Roxboro PI t
/JPC (uAjoawe\npdes\roxbypas.396)
Ms. J. E. Garrett (Raleigh Regional Office - NCDEM)
Hwy 57 North Tel [phone] Fax [phone]