20151018 Ver 1_Application_20150929

PAT L. MCCRORY
GOVERNOR
d���4'�
� Y�� � �Y
.3 �
��S
�r �?.d�
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
September 24, 2015
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
ATTN: Mr. Andy Williams
NCDOT Division 8 Project Coordinator
NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON
SECRETARY
Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 3 for replacement of Bridge
No. 8 over Drowning Creek on SR 1203/1412 (Turnpike Road), Hoke and
Scotland Counties, North Carolina. Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1203(2),
TIP No. B-4967.
Dear Sir,
Please find enclosed the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) form, stormwater management
plan, permit drawings, and roadway design plans for the above referenced project. A
Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was completed for this project September 23,
2014. No written approval from the N.C. Division of Water Resources (DWR) is required
and this permit application is being sent to DWR for informational purposes only.
The proposed let date for the project is June 21, 2016 with a review date of May 3, 2016.
However, the let date may advance as additional funds become available.
Please note that the PCE states that this project is over the Lumber River and thus classified as
a National Wild and Scenic River and a North Carolina Natural and Scenic River. The DWR
stream GIS layer and the USGS topo map designate this bridge crosses over Drowning Creek.
Also the NC DENR stream classification website classifies the source of the Lumber River at
the junction of Buffalo Creek and Drowning Creek. This is 1.3 miles downstream from SR
1412, Turnpike Road, where the National Wild and Scenic River System and North Carolina
Natural and Scenic River System designate the Lumber to start.
A copy of this permit application and its distribution list will be posted on the NCDOT
website at https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/Pa�es/default.aspx under Quick
Links > Permit Applications. A copy of the PCE is also available at the above website address
MAILING ADDRESS: Te�ePHONe: 919-707-6000 LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] CENTURY CENTER BUILDING B
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS �yEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG � OZO BIRCH RIDGE DR.
'ISJS MAIL SERVICE CENTER f2ALEIGH, NC 27610
Rn�Ei�H NC 27699-1548

under Quick Links > Environmental Documents. Thank you for your time and assistance with
this project. Please contact Rachelle Beauregard at rbeauregard cr,ncdot.gov or (919) 707-
6105 if you have any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
� J
, ..� .,_� �,.
�� Richard W. Hancock, P.E. Manager
��� Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit
cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List
�

Q�oF w a r�9Q�
� �
> �
P Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? � Yes ❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
� Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 8 over Drowning Creek on SR 1203/1412
2b. County: Hoke and Scotland
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Raeford
2d. Subdivision name: not applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g_4967
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable
applicable):
3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
3f. Telephone no.: [phone]
3g. Fax no.: [phone]
3h. Email address: [e-mail]

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name: not applicable
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: not applicable
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 34.975077 Longitude: - 79.376470
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 6.9 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Drowning Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C, SW, HQW
2c. River basin: Lumber
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
This site is forested except for the roadway. Land use in the vicinity is mainly agriculture and some residental.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.63
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
206
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace a structurally deficient bridge.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves replacing a 211-foot bridge with a 225-foot, 3-span bridge on the existing alignment with an off-site
detour. The new bridge will span the creek. Causeways will be used to remove the interior bents but will not impact
jurisidictional resources. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained fo�r this property / � Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past.
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? � Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Rachelle Beauregard NCDOT Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Preliminary JD issued 10/26/10
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No
6b. If yes, explain.

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
� Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) (acres)
Tem orar T
Site 1� P � T fill Bottomland Hardwood Forest 0 YNo � pWQ 0.02
mechanized � Yes � Corps
Site 1� P � T clearing Bottomland Hardwood Forest � No � pWQ 0.05
mechanized � Yes � Corps
Site 1� P � T clearing Riverine Swamp Forest � No � pWQ <0.01
Site 2❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.07 Permanent
X Temporary
2h. Comments: The pipes and rip rap outlet protection is needed so that the stormwater is diverted away from the
embankments. If these stormwater devices were not installed stromwater would flow along the embankments and cause
erosion which would be a safety hazard for the construction of the bridge. The outlet protection will reduce velocity from the
pipes to be non-erosive before entering the wetlands.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennia Type of Average Impact length
number - I(PER) jurisdiction stream (linear feet)
Permanent (P) or or (Corps - width
Temporary (T) intermitt 404, 10 (feet)
ent pWQ _
(INT)? non-404,
other)
Site 1❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 2❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 3❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 4❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 5❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Site 6❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts X Perm
X Temp
3i. Comments:

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of
impact number— waterbody Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or (if applicable) type
Temporary T
01 ❑P�T
02 ❑POT
03 ❑P�T
04 ❑P�T
4f. Total open water impacts X Permanent
X Temporary
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction roposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or (acres)
number purpose of pond FI
Flooded Filled Excavated de Filled Excavated Flooded
d
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporar T re uired?
B1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed bridge is 14 feet longer than the existing bridge, it will be at approximately the same grade as the existing
structure and will span the creek and remove two current bents in the water and an off site detour will be used.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Design Standards for Sensitive Watersheds will be implemented with this project. Best Management Practices for
Construction and Maintanence Activites will be used.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
❑ Yes � No
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? If no, explain: The amount of wetland impact is minimal
(<0.1) and occurs along the edge of much larger
wetland s stems.
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes � No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See attached permit drawings.
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
� DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? N/A
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � HQW
(check all that apply): ❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) � Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby
land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
not applicable
10

5. Endangered 5pecies and []esignated Critical Mabitat (Corps Requirementj
5a. INill fhis praject occur in or ne�r an area with federally protected species or � Y�s ❑ Na
h�bitat?
5b. �iave you checked with the 4�SF1N5 concerning �ndangered Species Ack ❑.��s � No
i m pa�ts?
� Raleigh
5c. rf yes, indicat� kne USFV1lS Field ��ce yau have con#acf�d.
❑ Ashevilke
5d. Wh�t da#a saurces did you use tc� determine vuhe#her your site would impac# Endangered Species or DesPgnated Critical
Habitat?
LISFWS website, field surveys. All species Na �ffect. Llpdated surv�ys for RCW cnr�ducted March 2015
6. Essential Fish Hahitat (Corps Fiequirernent}
�a. Wifl th�s project aecur in or near ar� area designa#ed as essential fish h�abitat? ❑ Yes � No
fib. Vlfha# data sQUrces d�d yau use to determ"rn� whether your site wauld impact Essenfial Fish Habitat?
IVMFS Ccaunty Index
7. Histvr�c ar Prehistoric Cuftural R�svurces (Corps Requirement]
7a. Wi�f this project occur Qn ar near an area that the state, federa� ar tribal
g�avernments �ave des�gnated as having histvric or cul#ural preserrratio� � Y�s j� No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designatian or prqperties significant in
North Carolun� histary �nd arcna�er�ingy)?
7b. Whrai data sources did yau use ta determine wnether your site wouid impact histQric or archeoiogicai resources?
h�EPA ❑ocumentatian
8. Flcrod Zone Designafion (Cor�s Requir�mentJ
8a. Wili this prpject occur �n a FEMA-desi�nated 1 a0-year #loodpl�in? � Yes ❑�!o
8b. !f yes, ex�lain how praject meets F�M,� requirements: NCDC]T 'Hydraulics Ll�nit coardinatipn with FEMA
8c. What s��arce{s} did you use ta ra�ake the floodplain determinatic�n"? FEMA Maps
�`
� Rich�z•d W. Hancocks P.F•.. _. f,- _--- 'C'�_ �. �''�."i!� 3
ApplicantlAgent's Printed Narne �a��
Applicantl�4gent's Signature
{Agent's signature is vafid anly i� an autharization letter fram ihe appiicant
is rovided.
�

��j���,��,`��, North Carolina Department of Transportation
:5t� �rt a��v���[ r Highway Stormwater Program '�.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN �
(Version 2.02; Released April 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 40158.1.1 TIP No.: B-4967 County(ies): Scotland Hoke Page 1 of 1
General Project Information
WBS Element: 40158.1.1 TIP Number: B-4967 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 8/7/2015
NCDOT Contact: Galen Cail Contractor / Designer: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Address: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit Address: 3001 Weston Parkway
1020 Birch Ridge Drive Cary, NC 27513
Raleigh, NC 27610
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail]
City/Town: Wa ram Count ies : Scotland Hoke
River Basin(s): Lumber CAMA County? No No
Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes
Pro'ect Description
Project Length (lin. miles or feet): 0.118 mi. Surrounding Land Use: Rural
Proposed Project Existing Site
Project Built-Upon Area (ac.) 0.4 ac. 0.3 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description: 2@ 11' wide lanes with 6' wide shoulders with 4' being paved, (9' shoulders in sections 2@ 9.5' wide lanes with grass shoulders and varying sideslopes.
with guardrail) and sideslopes that vary from 3:1 or flatter.
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Design/Future: 900 Year: 2035 Existing: 748 Year: 2016
General Project Narrative: Replacement of Bridge #8 on SR 1412/SR 1203 (Turnpike Road) over Drowning Creek in Scotland and Hoke Counties. The existing bridge will be replaced with a three-span
(Description of Minimization of Water bridge, 225' long x 33' wide bridge (Out-to-Out) constructed with 33" box beams. Span arrangement is 1@70', 1@85', 1@ 70'. The proposed stormwater system on the begin
Quality Impacts) bridge side outfall within the wetlands for treatment. The proposed stormwater system on the end bridge side outfall outside the wetlands but will filter through the wetlands for
treatment.
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body (1): Drowning Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 14-2-(10.5)
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C
Supplemental Classification: Swamp Waters (Sw) High Quality Waters (HQW)
Other Stream Classification: None
Impairments: None
Aquatic T&E S ecies? No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: G21 SW4 Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A
Project Includes Brid e Spannin Water Bod ? Yes Deck Drains Dischar e Over Buffer? No Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? No
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)

�
�
�
�
�
0
=?.,
��a
�
�
�
�
�
" 1
•�
�
V
W
0
"�1
�
�
�
� �
�
V
�
�
0
��,
See Sheet 9A For Index of Sheets
See Shee/ 1 B For Conventionol Symbols
See Sheet 1C- 1 For Survey Control Sheet
����� �� ����� ��������
�������� �� ��������
SCOTLAI�D � HO��E CO U1�TIES
LOCATION: BRIDGE 11t0. 8 OVER DROWNING CREEK ON
SR l4l?JSR I203 (TURNPIKE ItOAD)
TYPE OF WORK GRADIIVG, DRAINAGE, PAVZIVG, AND STRUCTURE
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
STA. 13 + 75.00 —L— BEGIN TIP STATE PROJECT B-4967
, STA. 20 + 00.00 —L— END TIP STATE PROJECT B-4967
.,
K � " __.
� I
� � I �
V= � ��9� /
� ;�e �` /
`k � ,� � �e ,� i / / ,� � � `K,�%�
`� � � � / � � ����
� � � � � �� � � � � e� � � � � /�e �� ��� �i i
� ,� ��
� � ,� � � �= � �: �= � - - �= �
�= � ,� � � .� � � � �= _,�- _ _
�K � � � _ — _ _ _ _ _�j�8_ _
� � � � � � � � � � � ' �
------------�=�i`e�� -' '' ----
TO US 15-501 -- _L- SR 141 (TURNPIKE ROAD)
— � — � —,� — —aiq—
_ _evl--------------eiM------
___-- �
� / � � � � �
/ / � � �' `K `K � � �
�� �,� �` � � � � � ,� B�*GIN �` BRI�GE
�a\ � � � � � -L- ,�TA. 15�+- 60.75 �
� � � �
� � � �
� � � � �
� � � �
� �
a
� � � � � �
� �
REDLINE DRAINAGE Kimley»> Horn
ALANS PREPARED FOR O
THE NCDOT BY.• "� F o�o ,a�h
DROWNING CREEK ,� � �« ,� � ,� ,� ,� ,� ,�
� I ' � � � � � �
� � � �
i ; � � � � � �
� � � � � � � � � � �
j �� � � �
i. � 'K �K '� � � � .k �e `� � �e�w� � Wi � I
I �I'' � � � � �--� /// \\� I
o ` `� `� \
�'I� 1 _ _ _ —e�M— � � / ��
2�U �y `K ���—
�qb
�Gp�
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 8
Q'y �
o�l= .� /
� N ��/�i
� ��i � �� � SITE 1
, ;
� ; �'
N „
_ , -,
I � � �i
i �
� � 1
. � � �
T —'L__��— --- �_>_._
---`-- --- -- y --j —L— SR 1203 (TURNPIKE ROAD)
i � "�
' ,� . �
� �
� � ,�" �Iz �^ �' � ��
o,� �
'K `K �e .K ,K C>i0 � ,� —IY�B_ _ _ _
U
� `K Q Y `K `I=
� �
� ,� o '\ ,� ,� �=
� `� � � � °; � .� ,�
� � �� � �
� �
� � � I j � � �
� � � �
� � �
� � I �I � � � � �� � �
� � �
I �� � � � � �
� DROWNING C�2E�K �
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. � �
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
__ __/
� E D BRIDGE
� -L- STA. 17 +
�
,�� �`.
_______ TO RqEFORD
PRELI1kbINr9RY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONS'4'RUCTION
P�epored in tne Oifice of: KYDR�I ULICS ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH
ADT 2016 = 748 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
50 25 0 50 100 1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610 O� ���r$%c
ADT 2035 = 900 LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4967 = 0.075 MILES �� .�
PLANS
K= 10 % LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT 8-4967 = 0.043 MILES 2012 STANDARD srecrt�rc�rroxs �� �o�$
D= 55 % TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-4967 = 0.118 MILES �� � �
50 25 0 50 100 = sr�nar'iixE': �
T 6 %* RIGHT OF WAY DATE: JAMES A. SPEER, PE a a
�xo�scr txcr,vrrex ROADWAY DESIGN �°� �
V= 60 MPH JUNE 29.2075 ENGINEF,R �'� ��'
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST = 2% DUAL = 4% ��' Q�
20 10 0 70 20 LETTING DATE: DANIEL W. GARDNER, JR., PE �� g�� �
FUNC CLASS=RURAL LOCAL JUNE 21, 2016 �RO�ecrnesrcx excrxErR
PROFILE (VERTICAL) "SUB—REGIONAL TIER" r�
SIGNAT(iXL:

N
Z
�
N
i
�
6
R
�
�
a
��w
�w�
� -w
�
� �
� �
�
� � �
�
LEGEND
�DENOTES FILI IN
W ETL4ND
�DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING
,�: v� �e � 'F `' _ _.. _ ' ` • .
'�` ,� 15' yy/ � ��:.�SI � �K ,K ,�_
Y: `� �` 'k ,� ELd'O,�IS � , CLAS$ 'B' RIP RAP -
i B€GIN� ST�TE PROJECT B-4967 � � � ouT�eT PROTECTiOd��
esT i roN'�
� ,� � � � `� EST�S S,� FF �:
� � � � � � � � �
�
�= � � � � � � � �
� � � � �
� � � � � � �
� �
� � �
� � � � � � � �
� �
�
�
� �
O
100' 0' 100'
GRAPHIC SCALE
S ITE 1
�
��
7 P�S Qb
L�
PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEEi NO.
8-4967 4
WW SNEE7 NO.
ROADWAY �ESIGN FI7DNAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
PIdELIMIN RY PLAN9
Dm NOT USE N'O L'DNSTRUCTION
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 2 OF 8
�
/
!
/ xO�cE C01l�ir ��y E� OACE�NT
piFl[EAS AS'$OC1/Tlpy
pB In PG i6
`� �
ROAO ISR lppj & l4/Zl � � � �
AVfO ROA�'AY
����,—_ %ORAfrORp�
�—
SEE SHEET 5 FOR -L- PROFILE
SEE SHEET �1 THRU S- FOR STRUCTURE PLANS

N
Z
�
N
>
�
6
R
�
i
a
��w
�w�
� -w
�
� �
� � ,
� � �
_ '�
- _ iNy 234.2b, � -�
� �l _
� '-'� NL1Y/K- _
'�. ___ �___� , —____� ___._
/- � � �. � ,� .K � .� � .
` l �
� K
LEGEND
�DENOTES FILI IN
W ETL4ND
�DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING
K F � � �
� � � � � �. : �
� � � � �
� � � � � � �
�
�= � � �
� � � � � � � .��
� �
�
�
� �
O
100' 0' 100'
GRAPHIC SCALE
S ITE 1
�
��
7 P�S Qb
L�
PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEEi NO.
8-4967 4
WW SNEE7 NO.
ROADWAY �ESIGN FI7DNAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
PIdELIMIN RY PLAN9
Dm NOT USE N'O L'DNSTRUCTION
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 3 OF 8
i
/
�
�- �
�
�� aoo
�
tiry ,.
� � � I
� � � I
,e�M� � I /
� � I �
� /
I
� \� �
.'� ../ x0¢E Cqilir L�y E�OA �NT
_ ' � '. I . O�FCEpS �S'SOC1/Tlp�j
pB In PG i6
,`v � �I _
/ �ee�
E.��N�.+ �8� �. /' �, Y ' _ � � '
4� �� �
- � --�-
- -- -� -srz� - - _------ '
i UPA' K ROAO ISR lrtlj & i4/21 �� ----� .
gPifyEO ROAQyAI'� � �_ �TO Rq
- _ ,- -�z � � frORp�
\ --
... �1_ >L. �-'L'r3tT��
Si NE A/� , -- _ ,
� \
�
`` 2S�
\ \
I } ..'��.�'� .. , \
! �
�
SEE SHEET 5 FOR -L- PROFILE
SEE SHEET �1 THRU S- FOR STRUCTURE PLANS

2`�-
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 2.5 5 PRO1. REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
� 8-4967 X-3
7';0 6',5 6;0 9,5 5;0 4',5 4;0 3'�,5 3';0 2'�,5 2';0 1'S lp � Q �j lp 1� 2';0 z'�5 3';0 3'�,5 4;0 4',5 5';0 5',5 6;0 6',5 %0 %,5
PERMIT QRAWING '
SHEET 5 OF 8
-------�----------�--------- --------' -' -----------�------------�---2 5
-----�-----------�-----------�------------�-------------------------------- -----'- - - -- { --- --�'-------- A -
------ --' ------- -�- ---------�' --290
235 ' - ' - - ' � �' � � ' ' ' '� '�-- '� ' ' -- ' �-- - � -- � � ' - � 235 -
— - - - - - - -,- - - -,- - - - - - - - - - - � - - - ± - - - , - - -,- - - - � - - - - - - - - -, - - - - - - -, - - -;� - - -,- - - - - - - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -'- - - - - — ' � - — - - - - - - - - -
� � � �'
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 23 .2 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
z�Q ' -- ' ' - - - ! - - ! ! '� - - � '� ' � � 9 � - -- ' -- - ' - -- ' � - - 230
,�6 -3- QD.O ,
' II
2�Q ' � - ; ' - ! 2� -
24�- - - - - ! - - - - ------- -- ' - - ' - ----' - ---- -' -- ---- ' - - -- - --'------------' - --- --' - - - -' ' -- - - - ! - - - - ' - - ' -- - ------ - - - -- - --- --------- --- --- ' - ----- - - -- -- - ------- -295
� � � , . - - - - -,-- --,- -,- - , - - - - - -, --, - --,-
? , c� � ', Q', Q', I I I I , - ', 0. 0� 0 0. �2 0 -- �\ � r� �
�`V 2
�
. - - - - - -- -
� � -' 2� 95 � �
-� � , - - - ,� =
,
- 24Q Q �� � --- ---; --- - -- - -- - - - - --- --- - - - -- � \� -- `-� - -- 290 -
' ' ' � �1 I �lvl ~� ' 3'• i' � ` ' ' ' ' � I ' ' ` \'` � ' �':l � ' �� I IC.� v ' ' I ' I
W V � � � � ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 3 I �� I ' ' ' '
�
�
`
�
- - - - -- ---- �� ---- --' - - ---- ----- -' -- - -- ' ----- ' -- � - - - -- - -- - -
r � �
� . . , , - - - - - - - -�
, - --- - ' ------
� '!`----- - - � �- . , t
� ` �
- � .� �� - , - - - - - — - - - � - - - - - - - ' _ _ � - - - - - - - - - - - -+ - - - t - - —' - - - -' - - - -' - -
23L� , ' I I
' ' --' ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' 23Q
� � � � .�5 +��. o�. ; , ; � � � � � : : : ,
25Q ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' - ' ' -- ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I
_ -- ' 4 -
24� . . . � , � � '� - � '� ' '� '� � �' � � . 2 5
, I , , , , , , , , , , , , 0.0�0 I 0.;020 , ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' - - ' ' -' ' ' ' ' ' ' - - -- `� -
_
_ _
. r . ; .- ,
24Q �.� � � - � ���.�� ; � - 2 0
, , , , . ' ' J'• 7
--±----, ---,---', -_- --- --- ' - --_� , ' , , , I , ' , , ` ,. , ' , , , I , I
�� ' '-- --- -'- ,
_
�
,
� -� - - � � � , - - -� -- � � � -
23Q '-- ' '�Jr -i- ' Q.QQ � --
� ' � � � -- � - ' ' ' '� _ � � � - 23Q
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , — � , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
7'S 70 b'5 Q'0 5'5 5'0 4i5 d'0 315 3I0 2I5 2I0 15 lb � 6 $ 10 15 2I0 2I5 3I0 315 d'0 d'S SIO 5i5 b'0 G'S 7'0 7'S

�
0
�
�
0
�
�
PROPOSE� �n�n�r nrr�v
R�
�������� � ������
�X � � �� ������
VLV I L/� � ILL 1 F1V1\1`.
OUANTITIES OF ESTIMATES: CAUSEWAY I
VOLUME OF CLASS 'A' RIP RAP= 72 yds 3
AREA OF CLASS 'A' RIP RAP= 0.044 vcres
Estimate 97 Tons Class 'A' Rip Rvp
VOLUME OF CLASS II RIP RAP= III yds 3
AREA OF CLASS II RIP RAP= 0.046 acres
Estimate 157 Tons Class II Rip Rap
Estimvte 225 SY of Geotextile Fabric
�WINf� �4HEET �T-1
-ET �i OF �
KoARQ�_Roadway\011036260 - B-4967\Hydraulics\PERMITS_En�ironmental\Drawings\Plan Sheets\Causewayodgn

�
0
�
�
0
�
�
PROPOSE� �n�n�r nrr�v
R�
(C
� �� � � � I : �, � � �� � � `•, I 1� I : " I � �� I I .
c.;(��.�. .�-��� ��� ��I.I:�
VLV I L/� � ILL 1 F1V1\1`.
OUANTITIES OF ESTIMATES: CAUSEWAY 2
VOLUME OF CLASS 'A' RIP RAP= 75 yds 3
AREA OF CLASS 'A' RIP RAP= 0.046 acres
Estimate 101 Tons Class 'A' Rip Rap
VOLUME OF CLASS II RIP RAP= 116 yds 3
AREA OF CLASS II RIP RAP= 0.048 acres
Estimate 164 Tons Class II Rip Rap
Estimvte 236 SY of Geotextile Fvbric
�WI�1(� �HEEfi �'I'-�i
-FlI` 7 OF $
KoARQ�_Roadway\011036260 - B-4967\Hydraulics\PERMITS_En�ironmental\Drawings\Plan Sheets\Causewayodgn

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (tt) (ft)
1 -L- 14+58.39 TO 16+16.77 RT Bridge 0.01 0.03
1 -L- 15+26.83 TO 15+64.46 LT Bridge < 0.01 < 0.01
1 -L- 17+31.00 TO 17+88.20 RT Bridge 0.01
1 -L- 17+11.60 TO 17+25.35 LT Bridge < 0.01
TOTALS*: 0.02 0.05 0 0 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
EXISTING INTERIOR PIERS WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CAUSEWAY.
2013 10 24

�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�,
O �+
� ot
� �,
o��
�.
�, T_
o °�
N 3�
i�
z C� �
� o�
��
�,�<
NCY�
t
�
�
�
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
.,
�
V
�
0
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
V
� �
�
V
�
�
O
V
See Sheet 9A Fo� Index of Sheets
See Sheet 18 For Conventionol Symbols
See Sheet iC-i For Survey Control Sheet
����� '�� �. ���lll� 1�������� �
�������� �� ��������
SCOTLAI�D � HOI�E CO U1�lTIES
LOCATIOIV: BRIDGE NO. 8 OVER LUMBER RIVER ON
SR 14171SR 1203 (TURNPIKE ROAD)
TYPE OF WORK GRADI11lG, DRAINAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURE
STA. 13+75.00 -L- BEGIN TIP STATE PROJECT B-4967
� STA. 20+00.00 -L- END TIP STATE PROJECT B-4967
� \1
�
, ,
,� ,
� � , —�_,'
i �
� i .
.
� � i ��
� i .�a� i
�-'
� � � � � � /� / � � :�����/
'� .�' I � � ,�..� `� �/
�' �. �' � �' � � .K '� '� /
`t. a,L �6 � / // / �'� �/
Vc � .� � � '� � � � /i / �/ '�'�� �`
/ ^
'K `K � � '� ,K / � � / / � � � ^
�e �K ,� � �` te �K �K ve �k � — � J
�
� � � � � � � � � � __ :.a_—�- —� -- �
� � � � �� � � � ___---- ,
---- --- — — .
---------�—.�a— — -------
TO US 15-501 -- _L— SR 141 (TURNPIKE ROAD)
`�� b
�Pp� S Q
G
LUMBER RIVER ,� �: � ,� � � ,� � � ,�
/ I ' � � � � � �
� � ,�
i ; � � � `� � �
�
� � � � � � � � � � �
I )� � � �
,� ,� � � � � � ,� � � ,0,.—,�� i
I Z� � � � � � ,,-----� �
�
o Z � ,� ,� � i
� � _a,.— � �i
i Z � �5 � ,_---
��w � � i
Y
�I � � / � �
N � ��
2 � �' � ^� �
�
� � � � �
� I / ��
V w �
i �� ��
. ,,
— — ----- —L— SR 1203 (TURNPIKE ROAD)
i ��"� '
�� �
_8,.— — — — — — — — — — — — —e,.— — — — — — — — — — —� — —B,._ _ _ — — — _ — — — — _ _ �' � \
_ — — — — •K `K �K V�` r I i / � `K�
— � �
/ � � � `K .� `K �: ,� � �K ,� ,� I jiY \ � � x� — —
� � � � � � � \ �? � � _—_ _—_I
� � � � �= � � � B�GIN � BRI�GE� � � � � �\ QI� � � � � � � � E D BRIDGE
�'�m � � � � � -L- �STA. 15�+-60.75 � .� '� � \ o;0 1� � � a a a �
� —L— STA. 17 +
� � � � � � � � �� � �I � � � �
� � � � � � � � � �£
� � � � � � � � � �/ �� � ��� � � � � �
� � �
� � � � 1 i i� � �
� v .� �= a � j ,� � � �
� � � LUMBER RIVER � � � �
� �
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
�CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III.
�
________ TO RqEFORD
PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT U9E FOR CONSTRUCTION
P�epared In the Offlce of: H1'DRAULICS ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH
ADT 2016 = 748 DIVISI011t OF HIGHWAYS
$� 2$ 0 $� 1�� ]D00 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610 0� ��W�B9
ADT 2035 = 900 LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4967 = 0.075 MILES ,�� �'.e�
PLANS K= 10 % LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-4967 = 0.043 MILES zoiz sraNO.v:v srEC�F�cnrioNS �e o�S
D= 55 % TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-4967 = 0.118 MILES P'E' � �
SlGNATURE:
50 25 0 50 100 T= b o�a * RIGHT OF WAY DATE: JAMES A. SPEER, PE s �
rno�FCr Fxc�rvFFx ROADWAY DESIGN �s. a
V= 60 MPH JUNE 29.2015 � �
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST = 2% DUAL = 4% ENGINEER �,�,� ���t
LETTING DATE: DANIEL W. GARDNER, JR., PE �� gW����
20 �0 � �0 20
FUNC CLASS=RURAL LOCAL JUNE 21, 2016 �RO�ECrDESrcx ExcrNEEa
PROFILE (VERTICAL) "SUB-REGIONAL TIER" PE
SIGNATURE:

Lt)
�
�
N
�
Note: Not to Scale
*S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering
BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.•
State Line
County Line
Township Line
City Line
Reservation Line
Property Line
Existing Iron Pin
Property Corner
Property Monument
Parcel/Sequence Number
Existing Fence Line
Proposed Woven Wire Fence
Proposed Chain Link Fence
Proposed Barbed Wire Fence
Existing Wetland Boundary
Proposed Wetland Boundary
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary
Existing Historic Property Boundary
O
EiP
�
O
E[M
i23
-X—x—x-
�
�
�,
�
- - - - w L B - - - -
wLB
E<B
EPB
xPB
Known $oil Contamination: Area or $ite �
Potential Soil Contamination: Area or Site — �
BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE.•
,�r
.�.
Gas Pump Vent or U�G Tank Cap O
Sign �
WB�� �w
Small Mine 'SZ�
Foundation �
Area Outline 0
Cemetery 0
Building �
School �
Church �
Dam
HYDROLOGY.•
Stream or Body of Water
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir
Jurisdictional Stream
Buffer Zone 1
BufFer Zone 2
Flow Arrow
Disappearing Stream
Spring
Wetland
Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch
False Sump
�----J
�s
— BZ 1
BZ 2
5�'�°]�]C �iF�° 1�C��°]�i�[ �C��$�]Ie�1��
�����1[�� �]F �[��iE�I����
CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS
RAILROADS.•
Standard Gauge
RR Signal Milepost
Switch
RR Abandoned
RR Dismantled
RIGHT OF Wf1Y.•
Baseline Control Point
Existing Right of Way Marker
Existing Right of Way Line
Proposed Right of Way Line
Proposed Right of Way Line with
Iron Pin and Cap Marker
Proposed Right of Way Line with
Concrete or Granite WW Marker
Proposed Control of Access Line with
Concrete C1A Marker
Existing Control of Access
Proposed Control of Access
Existing Easement Line
Proposed Temporary Construction Easement -
Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement
Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement
Proposed Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement
Proposed Permanent Utility Easement
Proposed Temporary Utility Easement
Proposed Aerial Utility Easement
�
CSX TRANSPoRTATION
MILEPo T 35
�0
a�
ia
v✓
ia
L�✓
��a
��./
/A\ ��
�J
��
_..
TDE
PDE
DUE
PUE
TUE
AUE
Proposed Permanent Easement with O
Iron Pin and Cap Marker �
ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES.•
Existing Edge of Pavement
Existing Curb -----
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut --- �---
Proposed $lope Stakes Fill - - - F - - -
Proposed Curb Ramp CR
Existing Metal Guardrail
Proposed Guardrail T T T r
Existing Cable Guiderail n n �
P d C bl G'd 'I n n n n
ropose a e ui erai
E Equality $ymbol
� Pavement Removal
°� �" ^ i�EGET�ITION.•
� Single Tree
�� Single Shrub
� Hedge '�"
���������
�#
Woods Line �""'-'
Orchard
Vineyard
EXISTING STRUCTURES.•
MAJOR:
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall
MINOR:
Head and End Wall
Pipe Culvert
Footbridge
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB
Paved Ditch Gutter
Storm Sewer Manhole
$torm $ewer
UTILITIES.•
POWER:
Existing Power Pole
Proposed Power Pole
Existing Joint Use Pole
Proposed Joint Use Pole
Power Manhole
Power Line Tower
Power Transformer
WG Power Cable Hand Hole
H-Frame Pole
Recorded WG Power Line
Designated U/G Power Line (S.U.E.*)
TELEPHONE:
WATER:
Water Manhole OO
Water Meter o
Water Valve �
�? Q f? Q
Water Hydrant �
�,�eYO�a
Recorded l!/G Water Line •
Designated WG Water Line (S.U.E.*� - - - -•- - - -
Above Ground Water Line A�c wa,a�
CONC
- J CONC WW I
�
CONC HW
>---------�
�CB
OO
s
•
•
O
/1
r
��
�
Existing Telephone Pole �
Proposed Telephone Pole �
Telephone Manhole OO
Telephone Booth ❑'
Telephone Pedestal ❑T
Telephone Cell Tower �
U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole HH
Recorded U/G Telephone Cable �
Designated U/G Telephone Cable (S.U.E.*) - - - - -'- - - -
Recorded WG Telephone Conduit '�
Designated U/G Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.*� - - - -T�- - - -
Recorded U/G Fiber Optics Cable T��
Designated U/G Fiber Optics Cable (S.U.E.*� - - - -T °°- - -
rv:
N Satellite Dish CC
TV Pedestal ❑O
TV Tower �
WG N Cable Hand Hole HH
Recorded U/G N Cable �°
Designated U/G N Cable (S.U.E.*) - - - -*�- - - -
Recorded U/G Fiber Optic Cable �° F�
Designated U/G Fiber Optic Cable (S.U.E.*� ----T� F�- --
GAS:
Gas Valve �
Gas Meter �
Recorded U/G Gas Line �
Designated U/G Gas Line (S.U.E.*) - - - -°- - - -
Above Ground Gas Line A�c co�
SANITARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole OO
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout 0+
U/G Sanitary Sewer Line s�
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer A�c sa�,+o�Y Sewer
Recorded SS Forced Main Line Fss
Designated SS Forced Main Line (S.U.E.*) — - - - -F�s- - - -
MISCELLANEOUS:
Utility Pole
Utility Pole with Base
Utility Located Object
Utility Traffic $ignal Box
Utility Unknown U/G Line
U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc. —
A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Geoenvironmental Boring
U�G Test Hole (S.U.E.*)
Abandoned According to Utility Records
End of Information
•
O
O
❑s
��.�
�
0
�
AATUR
E.O.I.

�
�
�
�
�
�
�9
O
���'�,
����0
S
�9a,
LOCALIZED PROJECT COORDINATES
-L- STA. l3 + 75.00 BEGI11t TIP PROJECT B-4967
N = 445405.9434
E = 1886639.3618
/
/ �
/
�
i � \
� - --
NCDOT BASELINE STATION "BL-101 "
LOCALIZED PROJECT COORDINATES
N = 445182.0050
E = 1886507.3055
DATUM DESCRIPTION
THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT
IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY
NCDOT FOR MONUMENT "B4967-1"
WITH NAD 83/ CORS 96 STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES OF
NORTHING: 446559.274fftl EASTING: 1887752.455(ftl
ELEVATION: 292.132(ftl
THE AVERAGE COMBINED GRID FACTOR USED ON THIS PROJECT
(GROUND TO GRIDI IS: 0.9998747093
THE N.C. LAMBERT GRID BEARING AND
LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM
"64967-1" TO -L- STATION 13+75.00 IS
S 43° 58' S8.4" W 1602.856'
ALL LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL DISTANCES
VERTICAL DATUM USED IS NAVD88
S UR VEY C011lTROL SHEET B-4967
m
BM #I
ELEVATION = 234.34'
N 445761 E 1886536
L STATION 16+14.00 283' LEFT
RR SPIKE IN BASE OF 18" OAK
�R�Rf'
NCDOT BASELINE STATION "BIr102"
LOCALIZED PROJECT COORDINATES
N = 445658.7175
E = 1886727.6482
>I
�
� }
I �i�
U��
� �
Z V
Q W
1-� Y
I ��O
Ui=
y �I
��
W I
1 �� � i
� � I N
I v �
-� _
r
� >
alY
1 JO �
�_
0
`�� y
�i
I y
� � �
NOTE: DRAWING NOT TO SCALE
LOCALIZED PROJECT
-L- STA. 20 + 00.00 E11iD
N = 445926.2395
E = I886985.6521
1 6 1 � �.. �. b�...
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. I SHEET NO.
Location
COORDI11tATES
TIP PROJECT B-4967
NCDOT BASELINE STATION "BU103"
LOCALIZED PROJECT COORDINATES
N = 446102.7564
E = 1887081.6937
� �
//r/
� `
°AVED ROADWAY � - - - - � _
- - - - - _ _ _ _ TO RAEFORD �
e�
POINT DESC. NORTH EaST ELEVATION L STATIUN OFFSET
101 BL-101 445L82.m85B 18865m7.3055 239.01 I1�L5,41 14.1A RT
lm2 BL-102 445658.7175 1886727.6482 234.56 16-34.34 66.56 LT
l03 BL-103 446102.7564 1887mH1.6937 246.30 OUTSIDF PROJECT LIM[TS
BM1 ELEVATIDN � 234.34
N A45761 E 1886536
L STFlTION 16�14.08 283 LEFT
RR SPIKE W BASE OF 18" OAK
NOTES:
1. THE CONTROL DATA FOR TfiIS PROJECT CAN BE FOUND ELECTRONZCALLY BY SELECTZNG
PROJECT CONTROL DATA AT:
HTTPSd/CONNECTNCUOT. GO U/RESO URCESiL,OCATION/
THE FILES TO BE FOUND ARE AS FOLLOWS:
B4967_LS_CONTROL.TXT
SITE CALIBHATION INFORMATION I3AS NOT I3EEN YROVIDEU FOR THIS PROJECT.IF FURTF3EX
INFOHMATION IS NF.EDED, PLEA5E CONTACT THE I,OCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT.
9 INUZCATES GEODETIC CONTROL MON(IMENTS USED OR SET FOR HORIZONTAL PROJECT CONTROL
BY THF, NCDOT LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT.
PROJECT CONTROL ESTABLISHED U57NG GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM.
NETWORK ESTABLISHED FROM NGS ONLZNE POSITIONING SERVICE (OPUS)

o�
�
a
0
�
�
�
Q a.
��:
%
� �.
o z�
PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
C1 PROP. APPROX. 1 1/4" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SF9.5A,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 137.5 LBS. PER SQ. Y�.
PROP. APPROX. 2 1/2" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SF9.SA,
C'Z AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 137.5 LBS. PER SQ. YD. IN EACH OF TWO
LAYERS.
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SF9.5A,
C`3 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 110 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO
BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED 1%p" IN DEPTH.
E1 PROP. APPROX. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE 625.OB,
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 456 LBS. PER SQ. YD.
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE 625.0B,
E 2 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER Sa. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO
BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 3" IN DEPTH OR GREATEfl
THAN 5%p" IN DEPTH.
T EARTH MATERIAL.
�f EXISTING PAVEMENT
W ASPHALT WEDGING (SEE DETAIL)
6'
' W/G R
4'
PS
3 .02
b'1
�O
�•3��G�� I
J���S
\S
� —L—
ii� ii�
POINT
6'
9' W/C
4'
PS
.02 .
' GRADE TO THIS LINE
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1
� —L—
33' OUT TO OUT
8'
4:T
30'-6" FACE OF RAIL TO FACE OF RAIL
1'-3" 4'-3" 11' 11' �.4'-3" 1'-3"
3.50" 7.2y� 3.50„ @
CL BEARING CL BEARING CL BEARING
2-BAR 2-BAR
METAL RAIL METAL RAIL
1" O�S b Cl Q�� POINT � Cl � 1„ O/$
�•1
PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
B-4967 2A-1
RNJ SHEET NO.
;OADwAY DESIGN HYDR.4UlIC5
ENGINEER ENGINEER
PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE POR CONSTAUCTION
4 SURVEY
v �
Detail Showing Method of Wedging
NOTE: TRANSITION FROM EXISTING TO TYPICAL SECTION
NO. 1 FROM —L— STA. 13 + 75.00 TO 14 + 25.00
�
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 AS FOLLOWS
—L— STA. 14+25.00 TO STA. 15+60.75 (BEGIN BRIDGE)
—L— STA. 17+88.25 (END BRIDGE) TO STA. 19+50.00
NOTE: TRANSITION FROM TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 TO
EXISTI NG FROM —L— STA. 19 + 50.00 TO 20 + 00.00
USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2 AS FOLLOWS
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ —L— STA. 15+60.75 (BEGIN BRIDGE) TO STA. 17+88.25 (END BRID
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2
NOTE: SR 1412SR 1203 (TURNPIKE ROAD) IS A STATE DESIGNATED BICYCLE ROUTE #1, (CAROLINA CONNECTION)

�
Q
�
�
m Bu t ELEVniiOx = 119.1<'
SEE SxEEt M-i
��
�P�S Qb
G�
� ' � � � � � � � � � �
; ' �
� O / � ��/ � I �� �K � � � � � � `K
�
CI.ASS IIRIP RAP TO � � '� �
NC ROLSE NESOUKES COIMSStlN ELEVATION 238.4' / �� ° � � �
z � °EEO �v� tStRUCrURES Par � �� I z� `REMOVE EXISTINGExBRIIDCG�BR�GE EhcCnJA.TiON� � '� � `� I
O iTEM.TYP� � � �SEE STRUCTURA� PLANS,TYPI � .� �
j ,� CLASS 'B'RIP RAP �� , _ � � �F��e� � � � (STRUCTURES PAY ITEMI ,� � a�M� �`� �
� � OUTLET PROTECT N� � � _ � '- � +65.0 -�- � CLAS5� B' FiiP RAP � �
� � EST I TON . � i � � � � _ . ml � '- 3 .00' i.� '�OUTLE`T PROTECTION � � � � �
EST 5 SY � i � -- o Z � EST i TON �----' �
� � � � .t ! 30.00' (LT. U � 4 .00' (LT.) � I
_EST—�y14-FF- �
ao.00' (Li.� N o sa.ao' (LT.) � — O ��
� I . � �aN 30.00' � . 60.00' ��i. e� j p z° � ~ � _ +io.00 -�-
� �k I , .� �E�!D i 6. LT. � J W �� 30.00'' LT. 7 LEE MfCOFF NENS
� ,� � � � . � w �R� ih. �ELBOWS wo o�� ;� '�� ,�� � , � o i so.00• I�r.
,� ,� v= '� � .� 1t3STAL � C4�R'B GUTTER '�� � i m � ° 2 . IS' W/ ELBOWS w000s � 3�9 nc �w
,� 's � FRO � .i5+ 7 . TO STA.i5*49.75 �e �,�� � m,� � r� �„ �� � �L StiOULDER BERM GUTTER
� �.e� - - t �A 1 .. / � i - W � `� `� j FROM T � � .2 TO $T ..18+12.00 �
� � � � � - � ¢ '� -L- 0.T AND T) � � � .. .
,� '� �� � � � �: � � wa�os '� � '� � � TAPER. a _�_ oao i ' I Q � �I� '� 50' TAP
�
U�
�
�
Q
�
s
m
�
m
� o'
� ii
oc�
a'
o �1
PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
8-4967 4
WW SHEET NO.
:OADWAY DESIGN HYDR.4ULIC5
ENGINEER ENGINEER
PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
/
/
3/
�
hP O�
ti `yo.
a o
/
/ ,qrtE COIN�r ��� EKORCEYENi
piiKERS �SSOCViqN
p8 �n PG 5
,� `� � � � � v � �: � ,� ,� i � � � i LT.. � � w �„ i i PDE H oao +os.00 -�- LT. & RT. �"� ~ �
� � � � �k v= _ .�e--�---� /i F �E ' E m� E 25' ;B, /`�/ �
v: � .� .� � �y _ _ _ — — — — — i ExiSii�uG A.w I INC. �`/ H _
- - - �-x.e- - - � � � � , � GRAU-35 �
—r i - i RETAIN ' o --1
0 0
1� E •B=W �
�,y„�,� ^ ^ o o �►
II_ — --- _---
o . . � �� .. ___
� � . .. Ex�SirvG Piw F � . TB . .
1 � .. . � _ — — — _BlM _ — _ _ _ _ — _ — �B1N� �� � �
F � ,
m i - � � . � � � � +as.00 -�- � � E DE oos a- � * \
30.00' (RT.) �e +BS 0 -L-
� �F^!'� ,� +00.0 -L- 51 `� 300' RT.
� � �s.00 �Rr.� ao ao.aa �ar.
-L- STA. 1�3 + 75'� 00 6€GIN « ST TE PRrOJECT B-4967 �x � � �15' "'� � 57.00' RT. �e
ELBOWS �
, � �� __ � � � � �
�a� �' � � � � � � ,� 30.00' (RT.I� CLASS 'B' WP RAP -
, �e � 57.00��RT.) OUTLET PROT�CTIOIV �
� v� �k v= � EST TON �
� � � � EST � Sv (�
� � � � � � �
�
� � � �
� � � � � � � �.;
� �
Nc nase x�wuaces cow.ss�oH �
�e DEED N/�
�O�
�' ,. � v �. � � �
�o�%�;!� � � • � -
�i� ��E' � �
���.��-i; � - _ _ i
Wii/i71�►A�.m I � �� . ' '�3 •.
�—�����7 �t� ����� .
f. � � I
�y�y�[y'j •'i
y'�C� 4d s �+n,�� ,��1�
'# {i�S '
nr pe , 'T' �E °- E OWS +lo.00 -L-
1 .
- `� � �_ ie _ _ _ _ _ 30.00' RT.
� ,�e30.00' (RT.) �0 — —�
� 40.(vQ' (RT� +15.00 -L-
30.0�Q' RT. � WOODS
5.00' (RT.) ,k .�: 55.tl6''RT.� �
1� � �
� � � lOiiE �ALTERS �ERS
CL�ASS 'B"`RIP j2AP p8 qg p� pg
`� � � EST�ETONROTECTfON O
'� ES� 5 Sv FF� 4 3
� \
:�� � � �� � � � .
I� �
� � � � �
� � ,� � -L- STA. :
�
NOTE: PAVED SHOULDER TRANSITION FROM -L- STA. 13+75.00 TO STA. 14+25.00 SEE SHEET 5 FOR -L- PROFILE
AND -L- STA. 19+50.00 TO STA. 20+00.00 SEE SHEET S-1 THRU S- FOR STRUCTURE PLANS