NCG120104_Compliance Evaluation Inspection Letter_20240126

ROY COOPER
Governor �.
t m
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary Q,ua vr °
WILLIAM E.TOBY VINSON,JR. NORTH CAROLINA
Interim Director Environmental Quality
January 26, 2024
Greenway Waste Solutions of Harrisburg LLC
Attn: Mr.Andy Burris
2105 Speedrail Court
Concord,NC 28025
Subject: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
NPDES Stormwater General Permit NCG120000
Greenway Waster Solutions of Harrisburg LLC
Highway 49 C&D Landfill, Certificate of Coverage NCG120104
Cabarrus County
Dear Mr.Burris:
On January 10, 2024, a site inspection was conducted for the Highway 49 C&D Landfill facility located at
Speedrail Court, Cabarrus County, North Carolina. A copy of the Compliance Inspection Report is enclosed
for your review. The site visit and file review revealed that the subject facility is covered by NPDES
Stormwater General Permit NCG120000 under Certificate of Coverage NCG120104. Permit coverage
authorizes the discharge of stormwater from the facility to receiving waters designated as Coddle Creek, class
C waters in the Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin.
As a result of the inspection,the facility was found to be noncompliant with the conditions of the NCG120000
permit. Please refer to the enclosed Compliance Inspection Report for additional comments and observations
made during the inspection.
Please be advised that violations of the NPDES Stormwater General Permit are subject to a civil
penalty assessment of up to $25,000 per day for each violation. If you or your staff have any questions,
comments, or need assistance with understanding any aspect of your permit, please contact me at
[phone] or via e-mail at [e-mail].
Si cerely,
Jerry W. Eplin,PE
Assistant Regional Engineer 3
DEMLR
Enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report ?
!t
c:
DEMLR NPDES Stormwater Permit Laserfiche File
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Energy,Mineral,and Land Resources
Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue,Suite 3011 Mooresville,North Carolina 28115
704-235-2100

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit:NCG120104 Effective: 07/01/21 Expiration: 06/30/26 Owner: Greenway Waste Solutions of Harrisburg LLC
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Highway 49 C&D Landfill
County: Cabarrus 2105 Speedrail Ct
Region: Mooresville
Concord NC 28025
Contact Person:Andy Burris Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
Highway 49 North from Harrisburg approximately 2.6 miles, right onto Phar Mill Road less than 0.1 mile, left onto Speedrail Court.
System Classifications: SWNC,
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On-Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 01/10/2024 Entry Time 09:30AM Exit Time: 10:30AM
Primary Inspector:Matthew J Gigante Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Landfill Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 3

Permit: NCG120104 Owner-Facility:Greenway Waste Solutions of Harrisburg LLC
Inspection Date: 01/10/2024 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
An inspection was conducted on January 10th, 2024. Based on the inspection conducted, Highway 49 C&D Landfill was not
compliant at the time of inspection. Most portions of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)were present on
site and up to date. The USGS location map and detailed site map were missing from the SWPPP.
Analytical and Qualitative monitoring records were present on site and monitoring was being conducted per permit
requirements. All outfalls on site were observed with no visible issues.
The facility must:
- Modify the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan to include the missing USGS location and detailed site maps.
Page 2 of 3

Permit: NCG120104 Owner-Facility:Greenway Waste Solutions of Harrisburg LLC
Inspection Date: 01/10/2024 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? E ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS)map? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a"Narrative Description of Practices"? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a BMP summary? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Most sections of the stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP)were present and up to
date. The SWPPP was missing the USGS location map and the detailed site map.
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Qualitative monitoring was present and being conducted per permit requirements.
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ E ❑
Comment: Analytical monitoring was present and being conducted per permit requirements.
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
#Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
#Has the facility evaluated all illicit(non stormwater)discharges? N ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: All outfalls were observed with no visible issues at the time of inspection.
Page 3 of 3