20150984 Ver 1_401 Application_20150915

aM alley, wlllla s, carmen & king, inc.
OKEngineering • Land Sarrveying • Construction Inspection
September 23, 2015 15507
( r
Ms. Jennifer Burdette
1
NC Division of Water Resources SEP 2 4 X015 '� d
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street etNR � -�ES�� C �� {
Raleigh, NC 27604
401 & BUFFER PERMITr1;
Re: Village of Granite Water Line Extension
Ms. Burdette:
On behalf of the City of Salisbury, please find attached the original and three (3) copies of
the Pre - Construction Notification Application for Nationwide Permit No. 12 for the
proposed Village of Granite Water Line Extension and a check in the amount of $240.00
for the required application fee. A copy of this application has also been sent to the US
Army Corps of Engineers for record only.
We have enclosed a Vicinity Map, a USGS Topographic Quad Map and a portion of the
Site Plans showing the location of the wetland and stream impacts.
Also enclosed are the website reports concerning endangered species, essential fish habitat,
and historical structures. Based on the reports, the project area does not have any critical
habit for endangered or threatened species, essential fish habitat, or historic structures.
The wetlands and streams on the project are located in bottomland hardwood forest, which
is typically not a habit for the Schweinitz's Sunflower.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to contact me
at (704) 938 -1515.
Sincerely,
Alley, Williams, Carmen & King, Inc.
J 4eAoo dy, P
15507 ❑cdwr burdette
120 South Main Street • P O. Box 1248 • Kannapolis, North Carolina 28082
Tel. - 704 - 938 -1515 e Fax - 704 - 938 -6810 • awck.com
ESTABLISHED • 1960

Ad" WA t�c9
O Office Use Only:
np: G
1 Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
aN P/�,A
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form m -
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Section 404 Permit
4984
❑ Section 10 Permit
or General Permit (GP) number:
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
X❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Village of Granite Water Line Extension
2b. County: Rowan
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Granite Quarry
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑X Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑X No
❑ Yes ❑X No
❑ Yes ❑X No
Utility easements are being obtained for the City of Salisbury
Municipal easements are currently being negotiated with the landowners
City of Salisbury
W. Lane Bailey - City Manager
217 South Main St.
Salisbury, NC 28144
°"�- -- �J)l
704 - 638 -5222
S ' +
EP
`24� !
IbaiI @saIisburync.gov
I - u
I U'tfvR - INAT,Er
RESOURCES
401 & BUFFER PG:MKJ'—FT;o
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Jeffery D. Moody, PE
5b. Business name
I' 111 Alley, Williams, Carmen & King, Inc.
'f
Page 2 of 10
(i app ica e).
5c.
Street address:
120 South Main Street
5d.
City, state, zip:
Kannapolis, NC 28081
5e.
Telephone no.:
704 - 938 -1515
5f.
Fax no.:
704 - 938 -6810
5g.
Email address:
jmoody @awck.com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Utility Easements on PIN# 403 038 and 403 037
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): I Latitude: 35.613716 Longitude: - 80.471406
1 c. Property size:
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
3. Project Description
2.3 acres
Un -named tributary to Crane Creek and Crane Creek
C
Yadkin
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Land cover is a mixture of forest lands and managed herbaceous cover. The predominate land use is agriculture with a mixture of industrial and
residential structures on the surrounding properties. A large portion of the project is located in the floodplain of Crane Creek.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.08
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 40
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Extension of an existing water line to serve future residential developments.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
2,795 LF of 12" DIP water main will be installed using track hoes, front end loaders, and vibratory compaction equipment.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: NCDOT TIP U -5541
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ❑Preliminary Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company: Pilot Environmental, Inc.
Name (if known): Michael Brame Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for El Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
6b. If yes, explain.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
3b. 3c.
3d. 3e. 3f.
3g.
If there are wetland impacts proposed on
the site, then complete this question
for each wetland area impacted.
Impact
2a. 2b.
2c.
2d. 2e.
2f.
Wetland impact Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
Rip -rap Stabilization Crane Creek
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
40
S2 -
Choose one
W1 P Utility Construction
Bottomland Hardwood Forest Yes Corps
0.08
W2 - Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No -
-
W3 - Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No -
S4 -
W4 - Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No -
S5 -
W5 - Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No -
V1/6 - Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No -
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.08
2h. Comments:
Bottomland Hardwood Forest cover cannot be replaced due to utility access needs.
Wetlands will be restabilized with native groundcovers.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b. 3c.
3d. 3e. 3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact Stream name
Perennial (PER) or Type of Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 T
Rip -rap Stabilization Crane Creek
PER
Corps
I 14
40
S2 -
Choose one
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
S4 -
Choose one
- I -
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
3i. Comments:
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 40
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
6e.
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries,
sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
Stream name Buffer
4a. 4b. 4c.
4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
mitigation
impact number (if applicable)
Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
type
Temporary (T)
(square
01
Choose one Choose
02 -
Choose one
I Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
I Yes /No
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b. 6c. 6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact
Stream name Buffer
Zone 1
Zone 2
number—
mitigation
impact
impact
Permanent (P) or
required?
(square
(square
Temporary (T)
feet)
feet)
B1
Yes /No
B2
I Yes /No
B3
I Yes /No
B4 -
Yes /No
B5
I
I
Yes /No
B6 -
I Yes /No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

I' D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The water line location has been selected to reduce the number of stream crossings and impacts to wetlands in the surrounding area. An undisturbed
buffer has been provided to streams and wetlands where possible. The final water location only has one stream crossing and is proposed at a 90
degree crossing angle.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The typical 50' temporary construction easement width for the water line is being reduced to 40' to minimize wetland impacts. The excavated wetland
material is being stockpiled on mats and returned to the wetland, and native riparian seed mixture is being applied after construction. Two anti -seep
collars are being installed on the water main to prevent draining the wetland.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
3c. Comments:
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Type: Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires I ❑ Yes OX No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes ❑X No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
There is no impervious area proposed for this project and all disturbed areas will be vegetated. The construction will occur under the Construction
Stormwater General Permit. See the attached email concerning the post construction runoff
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
N/A
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
❑ORW
❑Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑Yes Q No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA /SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application? ❑ Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in El Yes X❑ No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project is in an area where developers are required to obtain a Phase II Stormwater Plan approval from NCDENR. The measures required to
obtain plan approval should prevent additional stormwater quality impacts.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater will be generated from this project.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or 0 Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes X❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. -
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service - Environmental Conservation Online System.
See attached IPaC Trust Resource Report.
6. Essential Fish Habitat-(Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA EFH Mapper. See attached EFH Mapper Reports.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office - HPOWEB Map Service. See attached HPOWEB Map.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? I ❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The project will not modify the elevation of the existing terrain. There are no above ground utility structures within the floodplain.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA Map Panel 5668, Map Number 3710566800J, Revised 6/16/2009 & FEMA Map Panel 5667, Map Number 3710566700J, Revised 6116/2009
W. Lane Bailey
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Sip fure
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
i -2/ -/,�-
Date

i , pgp CT cR �� •, .. YRO RD
CA s
Ov
�..) ST PAUIS CH U RD �... / .. .�
\
OR E" CAg,O
GE OF GgQ Ag'gY e N 2p00,
��' Gg�'N'I�E

Village of Granite Water Line Extension
Town of Granite Quarry
Granite Quarry, North Carolina
27'30"
546110mE 547 548 550
Shilol�Cem
�. � SALISBURY
A
o
Granite
0
a'ke
E KERNS ST
O'
Wittenberg,
PHILL}P 0� Cem ❑
PROPOSED 12" DIP $
- -- EASTBEND -LN c,P '^ Granite
WATER LINE � l , +,��
Qu rry
a
WETLAND IMPACT \
No. W1 erRORD ELEVL �r
W
3 STREAM IMPACT
- s No. Sl
��v \ VEROyjC'.
O __� `\ \jam j� / '! � � / \ 1 "� \ - _ \ l' I _ !�, _\•� \ r
IS
rk
- -` i SAINT PAUL CHURCH RD' - ,'
\ f
�l
_ TWIN OAKS RD
(FJ
4.; CHATHAM-LN i ti O JP O
J.
ri
\ BG M 950
GARDN �S�
r.
FINK ST
SCHOOL ST
RD
UPPA i -) GANTT ST RD -
i — KLUTTZ t y
FaiEiih
MILLER
MAPLE ST
Rockwell Quadrangle
North Carolina
7.5 Minute Series (Topographic)
1 " = 2000'

'7
Eby
9 ,�
C'
�s
PROPOSED 12' DIP
'/ / // // / //y ! /I / WATER LINE
U I / �/ f F FO
i IN
O ,1' 0"1�'J F E , •E
F E
E E/
E E 1
E L E E F
E I - : E F E E/ E F E
- F
i WETLAND / I f t l �F F/" E E F E
/
BOUNDARY E It F IE F/ F E y F
E It F O k E E E / E E
E I F F F F h F /E
E
4A
F /E E E f I \,
C�
IN
UN -NAMED TRIBUTARY
TO CRANE CREEK
INTERMITTENT STREAM
[ _ w
i'• 4t
WETLAND IMPACT No. WI:
o'
/E
0.083 AC WETLAND IMPACT BOUNDED BY \ + yr�E t / f E t E E It t 1
LIMITS OF 40' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION �xOO \ E E /E E ' E
EASEMENT AND EDGES OF MAPPED WETLAND t F/ F [E t t
\ E E E ` F
LATITUDE 35.613716, LONGITUDE - 80.471406 �' \ [ E /E t /E E J F
\ TF E 1 E /* Et \\
' 40' TEMP. CONST. EASE. E
`SJ• \ \ 9 t E E% F
\ °�•\ s \\
30' WATER LINE EASE. \� \ ��S+� '�D` \ `Nte\ E E E f
o E f
�titisa:f
SCALE. I" = 50'
O 50 100 150
WETLAND DELINEATION
STREAM DELINEATION
IMPACT LIMITS
40' TEMP. CONST. EASE.
30' WATER LINE EASE.
NOTE:
LEGEND
z
D
a
N
O
—WL8 WLB WLB WLB-
WETLAND AND STREAM LOCATIONS DELINEATED BY PILOT
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
alley, williams, carmen, a king, inc. VILLAGE OF GRANITE WATER LINE EXTENSION °`�""`° °"` `"` "" '-°'"" - -15507
CONSULTING ENGINEERS '- • 70' WETLAND AND STREAM 9fD YD.
rem ucom s r-m TOWN OF GRANITE QUARRY '°°"` R� IMPACT AREAS
120 SOUTH rut snm P.O. eox 1248 GRANITE QUARRY, NORTH CAROLINA
KAH00PO HC 2EOV 7W /9b -7515 1 7 ar: 2

1 0
sli /c!/
f '�
914- t o -_ o I /
PROPOSED 12' DIP WATER LINE
I
� I
\ —=-,7 ,
STREAM IMPACT No. S1:
/
z
0
YA
to
�IT
l�l-
r0l,>3,
40 LF STREAM IMPACT MEASURED FROM
LIMITS OF 40' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT (AVERAGE STREAM WIDTH 14 FT)
LATITUDE 35.611619, LONGITUDE - 80.470054
/� � / � �• � ,'� III '4 i /
40 LF OF CONCRETE
4w ENCASEMENT
/ I j � 88 88 9'.
ul
CLASS 1 RIPRAP
BANK STABILIZATION
FEMA FLOODWAY
X,
FEMA FLOODWAY
I � I
40' TEMP. C❑NST. EASE. I I� o° I
I I
I I /30' WATER LINE EASE.. I,
NOTE:
i A PORTION OF THE PROJECT
LIES WITHIN A ZONE AE
I I I I I ( SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
I Cm I
If I + m
I i
+
I 1a6
II�N � ! ►1
` ``,,, It l l llll " /. `
�\ACRO
3311 _
.9 -9 -15 qL
''��lllll�ltill`
5GALE: I" = 50'
O 50 100 150
WETLAND DELINEATION
STREAM DELINEATION
IMPACT LIMITS
40' TEMP. CONST. EASE.
30' WATER LINE EASE.
NOTE:
LEGEND
—wee VVL8 WL8 Wl.e-
WETLAND AND STREAM LOCATIONS DELINEATED BY PILOT
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
alley, willlam5, carmen, & king, lnc. VILLAGE OF GRANITE WATER LINE EXTENSION 0"' � swc ° "09'15 ' w 15507
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I' ' WETLAND AND STREAM,, 2
rim UCOM 0 r -0203 TOWN OF GRANITE QUARRY c«onc
129 SOUM WA mar P.O. Box 12ae GRANITE QUARRY, NORTH CAROLINA IMPACT AREAS
NAI1NMOl15. NC 29082 704/938 -1513
W
li
0
n�
40 LF STREAM IMPACT MEASURED FROM
LIMITS OF 40' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT (AVERAGE STREAM WIDTH 14 FT)
LATITUDE 35.611619, LONGITUDE - 80.470054
/� � / � �• � ,'� III '4 i /
40 LF OF CONCRETE
4w ENCASEMENT
/ I j � 88 88 9'.
ul
CLASS 1 RIPRAP
BANK STABILIZATION
FEMA FLOODWAY
X,
FEMA FLOODWAY
I � I
40' TEMP. C❑NST. EASE. I I� o° I
I I
I I /30' WATER LINE EASE.. I,
NOTE:
i A PORTION OF THE PROJECT
LIES WITHIN A ZONE AE
I I I I I ( SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA
I Cm I
If I + m
I i
+
I 1a6
II�N � ! ►1
` ``,,, It l l llll " /. `
�\ACRO
3311 _
.9 -9 -15 qL
''��lllll�ltill`
5GALE: I" = 50'
O 50 100 150
WETLAND DELINEATION
STREAM DELINEATION
IMPACT LIMITS
40' TEMP. CONST. EASE.
30' WATER LINE EASE.
NOTE:
LEGEND
—wee VVL8 WL8 Wl.e-
WETLAND AND STREAM LOCATIONS DELINEATED BY PILOT
ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
alley, willlam5, carmen, & king, lnc. VILLAGE OF GRANITE WATER LINE EXTENSION 0"' � swc ° "09'15 ' w 15507
CONSULTING ENGINEERS I' ' WETLAND AND STREAM,, 2
rim UCOM 0 r -0203 TOWN OF GRANITE QUARRY c«onc
129 SOUM WA mar P.O. Box 12ae GRANITE QUARRY, NORTH CAROLINA IMPACT AREAS
NAI1NMOl15. NC 29082 704/938 -1513

1
From: Randall, Mike f mailto:mike.randall @ncdenr.eovj
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2015 11:58 AM
To: Wes Webb <wwebb @awck.com>
Subject: RE: Granite Quarry Water Line extension - Stormwater Management Plan Exemption Request
The project does not require a state stormwater permit /stormwater management plan since BUA is
limited to minor incidental BUA.
Mike Randall
Stormwater Permitting Program
NC Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources (DEMLR)
Land Quality Section
Stormwater Permitting
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1612
Office: 919 - 807 -6374
Cell: 919 - 389 -7801
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to public records laws
From: Wes Webb fmailto:wwebb @awck.comj
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2015 9:17 AM
To: Randall, Mike
Subject: Granite Quarry Water Line extension - Stormwater Management Plan Exemption Request
A =
Please find attached a location map showing the location of the proposed water line extension. This line
will be constructed by the Town of Granite Quarry to serve an area within the City and then donated to
Salisbury -Rowan Utilities for operation and maintenance of the system. The line will be a cross - county
installation and will not have any impervious area construction associated with the water line. Any
areas disturbed will be revegetated at the end of construction. As part of the project requirements, the
flowing permits will be applied for:
NCDENR - Land Quality Section — Sediment and Erosion Control Plan Approval
NCDENR - Land Quality Section — Stormwater General Permit NCG010000 for construction-
related activities
NCDENR — Public Water Supply — Water Line Construction Plan Approval
US Army Corp of Engineers — 404 Permit, Nationwide General Permit #12 coverage
NCDENR — Division of Water Resources —401 permit, General Certification 3884 coverage
The disturbed area will exceed one acre, but the project will restore all disturbed areas back to a
vegetated condition. The project includes a stream crossing and an impact to a forested wetland and
permit applications are being prepared for these permits. Forested areas will be reestablished with a

I'
grass groundcover to allow access for maintenance and inspection. The impacted forested wetland will
be revegetated with NCDOT's Native Grass Seeding specifications.
We are requesting that the project be exempt from applying for a stormwater management plan
approval. The revegetation of the project will occur under the stormwater permit for construction -
related activities, structural measures are not proposed for the treatment of post construction
stormwater, the project should not create any post construction stormwater quality issues, and the only
maintenance required for the project will be the occasional mowing of the utility r /w.
Let me know if you need any additional information. Please call if you have any questions
Wes Webb, PE
Alley, Williams, Carmen & King, Inc.
120 South Main St.
PO Box 1248
Kannapolis, NC 28082 -1248
Tel. - (704)938 -1515
Fax - (704)938 -6810
wwebb( awck.com
www.awck.com

. . 0
0.
A kv
Ino
,,% - A
look

IPaC Trust Resource Report
US Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC Trust Resource Report
Project Description
NAME
Village of Granite Water Line Extension
PROJECT CODE
H22J2- E7SSV- FOHNL -N PXOQ- 3QQEXQ
LOCATION
Rowan County, North Carolina
DESCRIPTION
No description provided
H22J2- E7SSV -FOH NL- NPXOQ- 3QQEXQ
�
%
,k k un . l
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Contact Information
Species in this report are managed by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801 -1082
(828) 258 -3939
09/10/2015 11:21 IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation Page 2
G�
A
L
'S
std
'
(
4,.2 .�^ .,<'h *•
; -t_,3' w _ _ _ ..._
>rm�.
tt
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Contact Information
Species in this report are managed by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801 -1082
(828) 258 -3939
09/10/2015 11:21 IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation Page 2

IPaC Trust Resource Report H22J2- E7SSV- FOHNL - NPXOQ- 3QQEXQ
Endangered Species
Proposed, candidate, threatened, and endangered species that are managed by the
Endangered Species Program and should be considered as part of an effect analysis
for this project.
This unofficial species list is for informational purposes only and does not fulfill the
requirements under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, which states that Federal
agencies are required to "request of the Secretary of Interior information whether any
species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a
proposed action." This requirement applies to projects which are conducted, permitted
or licensed by any Federal agency.
A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can be
obtained by returning to this project on the IPaC website and requesting an Official
Species List from the regulatory documents section.
Flowering Plants
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii Endangered
CRITICAL HABITAT
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
hops: / /ecos.fws,gov /soeciesProfile / roo file /soeciesProfile .action ?spcode =Q2B7
_ 11 W •
Northern Long -eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Threatened
CRITICAL HABITAT
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
httos: / /ecos.fws.aov /soeciesProfile /profile /soeciesProfile ,action ?sr)code =AOJE
Critical Habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) within the project area must be analyzed along with
the endangered species themselves.
There is no critical habitat within this project area
09/10/2015 11:21 IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation Page 3

IPaC Trust Resource Report
Migratory Birds
H22J2- E7SSV- FOHNL- NPXOQ- 3QQEXQ
Birds are protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act.
Any activity which results in the take of migratory birds or eagles is prohibited unless
authorized by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1). There are no provisions for
allowing the take of migratory birds that are unintentionally killed or injured.
You are responsible for complying with the appropriate regulations for the protection of
birds as part of this project. This involves analyzing potential impacts and implementing
appropriate conservation measures for all project activities.
American Bittern Botaurus lentiginosus Bird of conservation concern
Season: Wintering
https: // ecos. fws. gov /soeciesProfile / profile /soeciesProfile. Wtion ?socode =BOF3
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bird of conservation concern
Year -round
httl2s : / /ecos.fws.aov /soeciesProfile /profile /soeciesProfile.action ?socode =B008.
Blue- winged Warbler Vermivora pinus Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
Brown- headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla Bird of conservation concern
Year -round
Chuck - Wills -WidOW Caprimulgus carolinensis
Season: Breeding
Fox Sparrow Passerella iliaca
Season: Wintering
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus
Season: Breeding
Least Bittern Ixobrychus exilis
Season: Breeding
Loggerhead Shrike Lanius ludovicianus
Year -round
http/ /ecos.fws.aov /soeciesProfile %profile /speciesProfile .action ?spcode =BOFY
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
Season: Breeding
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
Season: Breeding
Red - headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
Year -round
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
Season: Wintering
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
Bird of conservation concern
Bird of conservation concern
Bird of conservation concern
Bird of conservation concern
Bird of conservation concern
Bird of conservation concern
Bird of conservation concern
Bird of conservation concern
Bird of conservation concern
Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
Worm Eating Warbler Helmitheros vermivorum Bird of conservation concern
Season: Breeding
09/10/2015 11:21 IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation Page 4

IPaC Trust Resource Report
Refuges
H22J2- E7SSV- FOHNL - NPXOQ- 3QQEXQ
Any activity proposed on National Wildlife Refuge lands must undergo a 'Compatibility
Determination' conducted by the Refuge. If your project overlaps or otherwise impacts a
Refuge, please contact that Refuge to discuss the authorization process.
Refuge data is unavailable at this time.
09/10/2015 11:21 IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation Page 5

IPaC Trust Resource Report
Wetlands
H22J2- E7SSV- FOHNL- NPXOQ- 3QQEXQ
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats from your project may be subject to
regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State /Federal Statutes.
Project proponents should discuss the relationship of these requirements to their project
with the Regulatory Program of the appropriate U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.
DATA LIMITATIONS
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information
on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery.
Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use
of imagery; thus, detailed on- the - ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland
boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadate
should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the
actual conditions on site.
DATA EXCLUSIONS
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
DATA PRECAUTIONS
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the
geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities
involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or
local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such
activities.
Wetland data is unavailable at this time.
09/10/2015 11 21 IPaC Information for Planning and Conservation Page 6

ry
EFH Data Notice: Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) is defined by textual descriptions contained in the
fishery management plans developed by the regional Fishery Management Councils. In most cases
mapping data can not fully represent the complexity of the habitats that make up EFH. This report
should be used for general interest queries only and should not be interpreted as a definitive
evaluation of EFH at this location. A location- specific evaluation of EFH for any official purposes must
be performed by a regional expert. Please refer to the following links for the appropriate regional
resources.
Vv
5ourcm : Esri, C-ESCO, NOAA, National Geographic,
DeLcrme, )-HERE, Gseenams.crg, and other acntributcrs
Query Results
Map Scale = 1:72,224
Degrees, Minutes, Seconds: Latitude = 35036'50" N, Longitude = 81031'46" W
Decimal Degrees: Latitude = 35.61, Longitude = -80.47
The query location intersects with spatial data representing EFH and /or HAPCs for the following
species /management units.
HAPCs
No Habitat Areas of Particular Concern (HAPC) were identified at the report location.
EFH Areas Protected from Fishing
No EFH Areas Protected from Fishing (EFHA) were identified at the report location.

I
EFH Data Notice: Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) is defined by textual descriptions contained in the
fishery management plans developed by the regional Fishery Management Councils. In most cases
mapping data can not fully represent the complexity of the habitats that make up EFH. This report
should be used for general interest queries only and should not be interpreted as a definitive
evaluation of EFH at this location. A location- specific evaluation of EFH for any official purposes must
be performed by a regional expert. Please refer to the following links for the appropriate regional
resources.
S1
Sims: Esri, GESCO, NOAA, NatL -nal Geographio,
DeLcme, HERE, Geonames.crg, and othef ocntrit:utcrs
Query Results
Map Scale = 1:72,224
Degrees, Minutes, Seconds: Latitude = 35036'42" N, Longitude = 81031'48" W
Decimal Degrees: Latitude = 35.61, Longitude = -80.47
The query location intersects with spatial data representing EFH and /or HAPCs for the following
species /management units.
HAPCs
No Habitat Areas of Particular Concern (HAPC) were identified at the report location.
EFH Areas Protected from Fishing
No EFH Areas Protected from Fishing (EFHA) were identified at the report location.

NCHPO Search - Village of Granite Water Line Extension
T �+
u
Q �Ol
Syr►fmStQ's
a�a C en tcy Cl
n �Q�
^e Gr
7+
�a
c�
v°
�c
t
t
Sctflets Gra�,t Ln
Ea gibe nd 1j
ROWAN
COmPttition Or °
a`
u
A
U
dG
C4
CL PKtK Rd Oct JP`
0
r St p
° arJrs Cb
r 4`�h
o �
v C
r`J p
V
Ted Ln RW 1358 Heim Bernhard HOWSe¢
Cr -
E
E t th atham Lri
� n
September 11, 2015
NR Points
NR Individual Listing
• NR Listing, Gone
* NRHD Center Point
NR Boundaries
F—] National Register Boundary
ytil/Q
Ry
Sti pauls Church Rd
s,
%e
II
V
y
3
�t
PnIh�PO`
Nulba�fi
rolSt�
a
BYr,Y F -
4
'A
c
MCC all b Z-3
30tCwrw
Ru,,rningbird C,r
Crowell -r,
'I
ate ? <
n u # °R
0
'i
C M RW=1 Mft0W B=un Horse 4971
1
f
r rt Crnl Sl W 7
s
Amrricail Ou a,ry Rd
°r Lakw Ot
JL� � h n yCld cnanesfaaro�' � rrhs(�
RW0854 Granite Y Depat (Gone) FtYY0927 tirarrte flumy School 2001
�f&W0853 Granite QuwylS Area
is 9 Gel #s�� ur Quarry
. 135 •SY
4 dtaad St
,y.
49 c�lonBty = =i
Y �A4i dGlh! �Y
01
r �
Ycr
O' h
V
�lJ
13��c ok%tort'
lt;y r
v`
0
u �
J J
C
$at1OVT 005+'t Rd • ;I
6
y J
i�
1:24,000
0 0.275 0.55
0 0.45 0.9
1.1 mi
` 1.8 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Del-orme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri
(Thailand), Mapmylndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the
GIS User Community
lip
E
,gf P
4
N
°
E
1.1 mi
` 1.8 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Del-orme, USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri
(Thailand), Mapmylndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the
GIS User Community