20140332 Ver 1_Browns Summit_96313_MY7_2023_20240119

Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project
Year 7 Monitoring Report/Closeout Report

Guilford County, North Carolina
DMS Project ID No. 96313, DEQ Contract No. 5792
Permits: SAW-2014-01642, DWR No. 14-0332, RFP 16-005568
Cape Fear River Basin: 03030002-010020

Project Info: Monitoring Year: 7 of 7
Year of Data Collection: 2023
Year of Completed Construction (including planting): 2017
Submission Date: November 2023

Submitted To: NCDEQ - Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

Page 1 

Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600, Cary NC 27518
Office: 919.463.5488 | Fax: [phone]

January 18, 2024 

Emily Dunnigan 
Project Manager 
NCDEQ ‐ Division of Mitigation Services 
217 West Jones St., Raleigh, NC 27603 
Raleigh, NC 27603 

Subject:Response to Task 13 Draft Year 7 Monitoring/Closeout Report Comments for 
Browns Summit (DMS #96313) Cape Fear River Basin; CU 03030002; 
Guilford County, North Carolina Contract No. 005792  

Dear Ms. Dunnigan: 
Please find enclosed our responses to the Year 7 Monitoring/Closeout Report Comments dated December 
22, 2023 regarding the Browns Summit Creek Mitigation Project.  We have revised the Year 7 
Monitoring/Closeout Report document in response to this review.      
Report
Comment: Figure 4.1 and 4.2: Please include the additional wetlands on the CCPV and note the wetland
be removed from credit.
Response: Revision made as requested.

Comment: Appendix C: The mitigation plan states vegetation at year 7 should average between 7 and
10ft in height (not including some shrub species). Please include vegetation height data (average per plot
minimum) and discuss in the narrative.
Response: 6 of the 14 vegetation plots did not meet the 7 to 10 ft average height. However,
the average height throughout the plots is 8.2 ft. Table 8 in Appendix C and the narrative
have been revised as requested.

Comment: Appendix D: One of the photos associated with cross-section 8 is not displaying correctly;
please update
Response: Revision made as requested.

Comment: Appendix E: DMS encourages Michael Baker to include gauge data for the entirety of the
growing season in the final submittal.
Response: Michael Baker understands the importance of gauge data through the entirety of
the growing season. We aim to download gauge data as close to the end of the growing
season as possible; however, in MY7 our download date was sufficient to capture success.

Comment: Appendix E, Rainfall Graph: Please update rainfall data to include any monthly rainfall up to
final submission.
Response: Revisions have been made as requested.

Page 2 

Digital files

Comment: Please submit a comprehensive wetland shapefile with areas removed, areas added,
including restoration level and credit ratio.
Response: Wetland file has been revised and included in the e-submission folder.

One hard copy and one pdf copy along with updated digital files submitted via secure eFTP link are being 
provided.  If you have any questions concerning the Year 7 Monitoring/Closeout Report, please contact 
me at 919‐464‐5003 or via email at [e-mail]. 
Sincerely, 

Andrew Powers 
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.  

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

i

Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project
Year 7 Monitoring Report/Closeout Report

Guilford County, North Carolina
DMS Project ID No. 96313, DEQ Contract No. 5792
Permits: SAW-2014-01642, DWR No. 14-0332, RFP 16-005568
Cape Fear River Basin: 03030002-010020

Report Prepared and Submitted by Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
NC Professional Engineering License # F-1084

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................ 1 
2. METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................... 3 
2.1 Stream Assessment ....................................................................................................................................... 4 
2.1.1 Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability.................................................................................... 4 
2.1.2 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................................ 4 
2.1.3 Photographic Documentation................................................................................................................... 5 
2.1.4 Visual Stream Morphological Stability Assessment ................................................................................ 5 
2.2 Vegetation Assessment ................................................................................................................................. 5 
2.3 Wetland Assessment ..................................................................................................................................... 5 
3. REFERENCES ............................................................................................... 5 

APPENDICES

Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Restoration Summary Map
Figure 3 Reference Stream Locations Map
Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts
Table 4 Project Attributes

Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Figure 4.1 & 4.2 Current Condition Plan View
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table 6 Vegetation Conditions Assessment
Stream Station Photos
Additional Photos Vegetation Plot Photos

Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 CVS Density Per Plot
Table 8 Vegetation Plot Summary
Table 9 Stem Count for Each Species Arranged by Plot

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

iii
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Figure 5 Cross-sections
Table 10 Baseline Stream Summary
Table 11a Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring
Summary
Table 11b Stream Reach Morphology Summary

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 13 Flow Gauge Success*
Table 14 Flow Gauge Success*
Figure 6 Flow Gauge Graphs*
Table 15 Wetland Restoration Area Success
Figure 7 Wetland Restoration Graphs (2023)
Figure 8 Observed Rainfall Versus Historic Averages

Hydrology Monitoring
Station Photos

Appendix F Adjust Wetland Boundary

*Note: Per IRT credit release meeting on April 20, 2022, flow gauges have been removed from the site.
The table of contents remain the same to keep the numbering consistent among monitoring years.

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

1
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. (Michael Baker) restored approximately 3,903 linear feet (LF) of jurisdictional
stream and enhanced 2,478 LF of stream (of which 559 is for BMPs) along unnamed tributaries (UT) to the
Haw River and restored over 4.44 acres of wetland. The unnamed tributary (mainstem) has been referred to as
Browns Summit Creek for this project. All of these stream features are in the warm-temperature thermal regime.
In addition, Michael Baker constructed two best management practices (BMPs) within the conservation
easement boundary. The Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project (project) is located in Guilford County,
North Carolina (NC) (Figure 1) approximately three miles northwest of the Community of Browns Summit.
The project is located in the NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) subbasin 03-06-01 and the NC
Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) 03030002-010020 (the Haw
River Headwaters) of the Cape Fear River Basin. The purpose of the project is to restore and/or enhance the
degraded stream, wetland, and riparian buffer functions within the site. A recorded conservation easement
consisting of 20.2 acres (Figure 2) will protect all stream reaches, wetlands, and riparian buffers in perpetuity.
Examination of the available hydrology and soil data indicate the project will potentially provide numerous
water quality and ecological benefits within the Haw River watershed and the Cape Fear River Basin.
Based on the NCDMS 2009 Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priority (RBRP) Plan, the Browns Summit
Creek Restoration Project area is located in an existing targeted local watershed (TLW) within the Cape Fear
River Basin (2009 Cape Fear RBRP), but is not located in a Local Watershed Planning (LWP) area. The
restoration strategy for the Cape Fear River Basin targets specific projects, which focuses on developing
creative strategies for improving water quality flowing to the Haw River in order to reduce non-point source
(NPS) pollution to Jordan Lake.

The primary goals of the project, set in the Mitigation Plan, are to improve ecologic functions and to manage
nonpoint source loading to the riparian system as described in the NCDMS 2009 Cape Fear RBRP. These goals
are identified below:
 Create geomorphically stable conditions along the unnamed tributaries across the site,
 Implement agricultural BMPs to reduce nonpoint source inputs to receiving waters,
 Address known and obvious water quality and habitat stressors present on site,
 Restore stream and floodplain connectivity, and
 Restore and protect riparian buffer functions and corridor habitat.
To accomplish these goals, the following objectives were identified:
 Restore existing incised, eroding, and channelized streams by creating stable dimension and connecting
them to their relic floodplains;
 Re-establish and rehabilitate site wetlands that have been impacted by cattle, spoil pile disposal,
channelization, subsequent channel incision, and wetland vegetation loss;
 Prevent cattle from accessing the conservation easement boundary by installing permanent fencing and
thus reduce excessive stream bank erosion and undesired nutrient inputs;
 Increase aquatic habitat value by improving bedform diversity, riffle substrate and in-stream cover;
creating natural scour pools; adding woody debris and reducing sediment loading from accelerated
stream bank erosion;

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

2
 Construct a wetland BMP on the upstream extent of Reach R6 to capture and retain storm water and
for sediment to settle out of the water column;
 Construct a step pool BMP channel to capture and disperse storm flow volume and velocity by allowing
discharge from a low density residential development to spread across the floodplain of Reach R4;
thereby, diffusing energies and promoting nutrient uptake within the riparian buffer;
 Plant native species within the riparian corridor to increase runoff filtering capacity, improve stream
bank stability and riparian habitat connectivity, and shade the stream to decrease water temperature;
 Control invasive species vegetation within the project area and, if necessary, continue treatments during
the monitoring period; and
 Establish a conservation easement to protect the project area in perpetuity.

During Year 7 monitoring, visual site inspections were conducted throughout the year. The survey data of the
seventeen cross-sections indicates that those stream transects are stable and any minor fluctuations in their
geometry from previous years are within what might be expected for natural, stable streams. All reaches are
geomorphically stable and performing as designed, as confirmed by the visual stability assessment. All stream
riffle beds are vertically stable, the pools are maintaining depth, stream banks are stable and vegetating, and in-
stream structures are physically intact and performing as designed. No Stream Problem Areas (SPAs) were
identified. Small areas of invasive species (Privet and Multiflora Rose) were treated on R1 and R2 during June
and October 2023. In March 2023, Michael Baker added soil amendments to MY6 VPA to improve the soil
quality so that the native grasses surrounding the area will grow. Throughout the seven years of the project this
area has been a slow to establish herbaceous vegetation. Although, with soil amendments and minor
supplemental planting and seeding the area has improve. These areas can be found on the CCPV in Appendix
B.

During Year 7 monitoring, the R1 crest gauge recorded one bankfull event of 1.00 ft. The fall overbank event
did not give an accurate reading partially due to an infestation of ants within the cork at the bottom of the gauge.
The site has already met the bankfull flow requirement of two bankfull events during two separate monitoring
years previously (MY1 and MY2).
Nine wells (total) have been installed in the wetland restoration areas. BSAW8 was installed during MY4 to
gather additional data in adjacent wetlands. BSAW8 is located adjacent to wetland type 5 (Hydrologic
reestablishment) where BSAW1 is located. BSAW8 data shows the wetland preforming well above success
criteria. BSAW 9 was installed during MY7 to gather additional data to support the wetland boundary
adjustment. Eight of the nine are preforming successfully. One well did not meet success (BSAW2). BSAW2
historically has not met criteria; therefore, Michael Baker proposed a wetland boundary line adjustment during
MY6. The adjusted wetland boundary report can be found in Appendix F.
As the observed monthly rainfall data for the project presented in Appendix E figure 8 demonstrates, the past
12 months (3 out of 12 months) have been dryer as compared to historic averages for Guilford County. A total
of 40.43 inches of rainfall was observed for the project using the North Carolina Multi-Sensor Precipitation
Estimates (MPE) station, while Guilford County averages 45.84 inches of annual rainfall. The bulk of this
excess rainfall came over the spring of 2023, while the summer and fall of 2023 were well below the monthly
average.

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

3
In summation, the past seven monitoring years have demonstrated that the Browns Summit Creek Restoration
Project has met the performance standards and success criteria for vegetation, stream flow, and channel
stability. The vegetation plot data shows that over the seven years there has been consistent vegetation
density, height, and vigor throughout the site. The only vegetation concern noted during the monitoring phase
was for a relatively small portion of the total project buffer with poor growth, but it has been successfully
ameliorated. The as-built stem density averages 705 stems/acre and after seven years the stem density
averages 468 stems/acre. This meets the closeout success criteria and demonstrates that the site has
established good woody vegetation within its riparian buffer. 6 of the 14 vegetation plots did not meet the
average height requirement. The stunted heights in some vegetation plots are likely due to poor soils when the
floodplain was graded. However, volunteer species and herbaceous grasses have established within the plots
and surrounding buffer area. Lastly, the average height of all the vegetation plots is 8.2 feet, which falls
between the success criteria. The stream flow gauges on T1, T3, and Reach 4 Lower have demonstrated
substantial seasonal flow throughout the monitoring phase. All but one wetland monitoring gauge (BSAW 2)
have successfully passed every year throughout the monitoring phase. The site has received multiple overbank
events throughout the monitoring phase and endured a couple hurricanes. Finally, the cross-sections
throughout the seven monitoring years show channel stability with little erosion or aggradation, with all their
final morphological parameters within an appropriate range. Additional photographs have been provided in
Appendix B to show a comparison of a few historic and current photos of the site.

Summary information/data related to the site and statistics related to performance of various project and
monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report Appendices. Narrative background and
supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report and in
the Mitigation Plan available on the DMS website. Any raw data supporting the tables and figures in the
Appendices is available from DMS upon request.

This report documents the successful completion of the Year 7 monitoring activities for the post-construction
monitoring period. The entire conservation easement boundary has been inspected and is compliant with the
requirements.

2. METHODOLOGY
The seven-year monitoring plan for the Site includes criteria to evaluate the success of the stream and vegetation
components of the Site. The methodology and report template used to evaluate these components adheres to
the DMS monitoring report template document Version 1.5 (June 8, 2012), which will continue to serve as the
template for subsequent monitoring years. The vegetation-monitoring quadrants follow CVS-DMS monitoring
levels 1 and 2 in accordance with CVS-DMS Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.1 (2007).
Stream survey data was collected to a minimum of Class C Vertical and Class A Horizontal Accuracy using
Leica TS06 Total Station and was georeferenced to the NAD83 State Plane Coordinate System, FIPS3200 in
US Survey Feet, which was derived from the As-built Survey.
The specific locations of monitoring features, such as vegetation plots, permanent cross-sections, reference
photograph stations, crest gauges and flow gauges, are shown on the CCPV map found in Appendix B.
Channel construction began in October 10, 2016 at the upstream extent of the site and worked in the downstream
direction (begin on Reach 6 and ended with Reach 1). The construction was completed on March 8, 2017.
Planting was installed as major reaches were completed and finalized by March 10, 2017. Minor supplemental
planting occurred in March of 2018.

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

4
The Monitoring Year 7 visual site assessment was collected in October 2023. Visual Assessment is contained
in Appendix B.
2.1 Stream Assessment
Historically, the Browns Summit site has been utilized for agriculture. Cattle have had direct access to the
entire site. Ponds were located throughout the project, including within the alignment of R1, R3, R4, and R6.
Channelization was clearly confirmed by the historical aerial photo from 1937 and spoil piles were found along
several of the reaches. The project involved the restoration and enhancement of the headwater system.
Restoration practices involved raising the existing streambed and reconnecting the stream to the relic floodplain
to restore natural flow regimes to the system. The existing channels abandoned within the restoration areas
were filled to decrease surface and subsurface drainage and to raise the local water table. Permanent cattle
exclusion fencing was provided around all proposed reaches and riparian buffers, except along reaches where
no cattle are located.
2.1.1 Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability
Cross-sections were classified using the Rosgen Stream Classification System, and all monitored cross-
sections fall within the quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type.
Morphological survey data are presented in Appendix D.
A longitudinal profile was surveyed for the entire length of channel immediately after construction to
document as-built baseline conditions for the Monitoring Year 0 only. Annual longitudinal profiles
were not planned to be conducted during subsequent monitoring years unless channel instability has
been documented or remedial actions/repairs are required by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) or DMS. However, during preparation of the MY1 monitoring report, it was discovered that
the data provided by the construction contractor’s survey subcontractor for as-built was of low quality
and insufficient. The quality of the sealed as-built survey provided by the contractor was not discovered
until the MY1 survey was overlain on top of the MY0 cross sections. The channel in reality had not
fluctuated nearly as dramatically as shown in Figure 5 (cross section overlays) and has remained stable
and is performing as designed. This has been documented through field inspections throughout
subsequent monitoring years by Michael Baker and DMS staff. Due to the MY0 survey quality
discovered during MY1, Michael Baker proposed to utilize the detailed survey data and associated
parameters collected during MY1 by a different surveyor as the basis of comparison through the
monitoring phase of the project. This will ensure an accurate assessment of success and trends
throughout the life of the project. The contractor had the site’s longitudinal profile re-surveyed in case
future comparisons are required. The longitudinal profile overlay was provided in previous reports
(MY1).
Additionally, per DMS request, bank height ratio is calculated by adjusting the bankfull line vertically
to recreate the as-built cross-sectional area. Once the cross-sectional area is the same bank height ratio
is calculated and recorded. After bank height ratio is recorded then previous bankfull elevation is set
and the remaining data is calculated. However, in this case, due to a poor as-built survey we are
referencing all calculations to the MY1 survey. This will help ensure that the cross-sections best
represent the actual characteristics of the stream.
2.1.2 Hydrology
To monitor on-site bankfull events, one crest gauge (crest gauge #1) was installed along R1’s left bank
at bankfull elevation. The crest gauge readings are presented in Appendix E. The site has met the
bankfull flow requirements of two bankfull events during two separate years.

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

5
2.1.3 Photographic Documentation
Visual inspection of the site was conducted at a minimum of twice a year. Representative photographs
for Monitoring Year 7 were taken along each Reach in October 2023 and are provided in Appendix B.
2.1.4 Visual Stream Morphological Stability Assessment
The visual stream morphological stability assessment involves the qualitative evaluation of lateral and
vertical channel stability and integrity and of in-stream structures throughout the project. Habitat
parameters and pool depth maintenance are also evaluated and scored. During Year 7 monitoring,
Michael Baker staff walked the entire project several times throughout the year, noting geomorphic
conditions of the stream bed profile (riffle/pool facets), both stream banks, and in-stream structures.
Representative photographs were taken per the Mitigation Plan, and locations of any SPAs were
documented in the field for subsequent mapping on the CCPV figures.
A more detailed summary of the results for the visual stream stability assessment can be found in
Appendix B, which includes supporting data tables, as well as general stream photos.
2.2 Vegetation Assessment
In order to determine if vegetation planting success criteria were achieved, vegetation-monitoring quadrants
were installed and monitored across the site in accordance with the CVS-DMS Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4.1 (2007). The vegetation monitoring plots are a minimum of 2 percent of the planted
portion of the Site. Fourteen plots were established at random locations within the easement area at this site and
evaluated using Monitoring Levels 1 and 2. Individual quadrants are 100 square meters for woody tree species.
2.3 Wetland Assessment
Nine (9) groundwater monitoring wells were installed across the site to document hydrologic conditions of the
restored wetland area. The wetland gauges are depicted on the CCPV figures (Figure 2) found in Appendix B.
Installation and monitoring of the groundwater stations have been conducted in accordance with the USACE
standard methods. The growing season starts March 22 and ends November 13 with a hydroperiod of 237 days.

3. REFERENCES
Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) and NC Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). CVS-DMS
Data Entry Tool v. 2.3.1. University of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC.

Lee, M., Peet R., Roberts, S., Wentworth, T. 2007. CVS-DMS Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version
4.1.

North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). 2012. Monitoring Requirements and
Performance Standards for Stream and/or Wetland Mitigation. Version 1.5, June 8, 2012.

North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). 2009. Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities.
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A Classification of Natural Rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Schafale, M. P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North Carolina, third
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. Division of Parks and Recreation,

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

6
NCDEQ. Raleigh, NC.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines, April 2003, U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE). Wilmington District.

Appendix A

Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables

Site Location
Fairg
r
o
v
e

C
h
u
r
c
h

R
d
Sp
e
a
r
m
a
n

R
d
NC Highway 150Mi
d
d
l
e
l
a
n
d

D
r
Y
a
n
c
e
y
v
i
l
l
e

R
d
G U I L F O R D
G U I L F O R D
R O C K I N G H A M
R O C K I N G H A M
Greensboro
Greensboro
£¤158
Guilford County
^_
£¤158
Site Location
§¨¦85
£¤29
150
Greensboro E
Figure 1
Project Vicinity Map
Browns Summit (DMS# 96313)
Note: Site is located within targeted local
watershed 0303002010020.
Conservation Easement
NCDMS TLW
NCDEQ - Division
of Mitigation Services
0.5 0 0.5
Miles
To access the site from Raleigh, take Interstate 40 and head west on I-40 towards Greensboro, for approximately 68 miles. Take the exit
ramp to E. Lee St. (exit 224) towards Greensboro and continue for 2 miles before turning onto U.S. Highway 29 North. Once on U.S.
Highway 29 North, travel north for approximately 10 miles before exiting and turning on to NC-150 West. Continue west on NC-150 for 5
miles. The project site is located along and between NC-150 and Spearman Rd., with access points through residences on Middleland Dr.
and Broad Ridge Ct. The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the site may require
traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and therefore access by the general public is not permitted. Access by authorized
personnel of state and federal agencies or their designees/contractors involved in the development, oversight and stewardship of the
restoration site is permitted within the terms and timeframes of their defined roles. Any intended site visitation or activity by any person
outside of these previously sanctioned roles and activities requires prior coordination with DMS.
Figure 2Restoration Summary MapBrowns Summit Site(DMS #96313)
Reach R1
Reach T1
Reach R2 (lower)
Reach R3 (lower)
Reach R3 (upper)
Reach T3
Reach R4
Reach R6
Reach R5
Reach T4
Reach T2Reach R2 (upper)
NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC
911 Board
0 500 1,000250
Feet
Conservation Easement
Restoration Feature Approach
Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
No Credit
Wetland Mitigation Types
1 - "Functioning", 3:1 credit ratio Rehabilitation
2 - Degraded, 1.5:1 credit ratio Rehabilitation
3 - Partially Functioning, 1.5:1 credit ratio Rehabilitation
4 - Filled, 1:1 credit ratio Reestablishment
5 - Hydrologic Reestablishment, 3.5:1 ratio
Figure 3Reference StreamLocations MapBrowns Summit Site
#*
#*
#*!(
^
Buckhorn Creek
Project Location
UT to Reedy Fork
Haw River
State Park
Haw River
State Park
9
87
6565
150
150
61
£¤29
£¤2
9
£¤2
2
0
£¤158
ROCKINGHAMCOUNTY
GUILFORDCOUNTY
NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC
911 Board
E
2 0 21
Miles
!(Reference Wetland
#*Reference Stream Reaches
Major Roads
Minor Roads
Rivers/Streams
Lakes/Ponds
County Boundary
Geology
Carolina Slate Belt
Charlotte and Milton Belts
Project Location^
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Stream Buffer Nitrogen Nutrient Offset
Phosphorus
Nutrient Offset
Type R, E1, EII R E
Totals 5,300.867 SMU 2.501 0.0
Stationing/ Location (As-Built)*Restoration/ Restoration
Equivalent (SMU/WMU)
Restoration Footage or
Acreage (LF/AC)**Mitigation Ratio
51+00.00 - 63+89.87 1,290 1,290 1:1
49+65.28 - 51+00.00 54 134 2.5:1
43+48.17 - 49+65.28 409 614 1.5:1
39+35.73 - 43+48.17
(CE 40+45.09 - 41+05.52)235 352 1.5:1
28+31.92 - 39+35.73 1,102 1,102 1:1
15+35.86 - 28+31.92 1,296 1,296 1:1
10+00 - 15+35.86 214 536 2.5:1
10+00 - 15+19.39 295 442 LF (valley length) 1.5:1
10+00 - 11+44.99 145 145 1:1
10+00 - 12+85.21 113 283 2.5:1
10+04.88 - 10+92.84 70 70 1:1
10+30.18 - 11+49.36 78 117 LF (valley length) 1.5:1
See Figures 0.51 1.53 3:1
See Figures 0.29 0.43 1.5:1
See Figures 1.17 1.75 1.5:1
See Figures 0.46 0.46 1:1
See Figures 0.08 0.27 3.5:1
Stream (LF)Buffer (SF) Upland (AC)
3,903 4.440
1,525
953
Element Location
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Mitigation Credits
Riparian Wetland Non-riparian Wetland
Project Components
Project Component or Reach ID Existing Footage/
Acreage (LF/AC)*Approach
1,350 Restoration
R3
(downstream section)
60' easement break subtracted from stream
lengths
362 Enhancement I
Enhancement I
Re-establishment
Wetland Area - Type 2 0.49 Rehabilitation
RehabilitationWetland Area - Type 3
Enhancement I
Component Summation
Restoration Level Riparian Wetland (AC) Non-riparian Wetland (AC)
Restoration
Pond; FS= Filter Strip; S= Grassed Swale; LS= Level Spreader; NI=Natural Infiltration Area
BMP Elements
Purpose/Function Notes
BMP Elements: BR= Bioretention Cell; SF= Sand Filter; SW= Stormwater Wetland; WDP= Wet Detention Pond; DDP= Dry Detention
Enhancement II
Enhancement II
Restoration
Rehabilitation
Re-establishment
Enhancement I/BMP
Wetland Area - Type 4 0.49
Wetland Area - Type 5
283
83
1.57
2.06
0.27
T4 47
T3
Wetland Area - Type 1
R1 1,217 Restoration
R2
(downstream section)167 Enhancement II
R2
(upstream section)701
R4
R6
R3
(upstream section)1,224
536
*Wetland existing acrage and restoration acrages were swapped in Table 5.1 of the Mitigation Plan.
**Stations and lengths are taken from the 2017 As-Built survey and may thus differ slightly from the Mitigation Plan.
Restoration
T2
R5 536 Enhancement II
T1
Enhancement I/BMP
121 Restoration
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Activity or Report Scheduled Completion Data Collection
Complete
Actual Completion
or Delivery
Mitigation Plan Prepared not specified in proposal Summer 2015 May 1, 2015
Mitigation Plan Amended not specified in proposal Summer 2015 September 17, 2015
Mitigation Plan Approved December 4, 2014 Winter 2015 November 2, 2015
Final Mitigation Plan with PCN (minor revisions requested in
approval letter)not specified in proposal Winter 2015 January 29, 2016
Final Design – (at least 90% complete)not specified in proposal September 20, 2016
Construction Begins not specified in proposal October 10, 2016
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area June 1, 2015 March 10, 2017
Permanent seed mix applied to entire project area June 2, 2015 March 10, 2017
Planting of live stakes June 3, 2015 March 10, 2017
Planting of bare root trees June 3, 2015 March 10, 2017
End of Construction May 4, 2015 March 8, 2017
Survey of As-built conditions (Year 0 Monitoring-baseline)June 3, 2015 Spring 2017 July 1, 2017
Baseline Monitoring Report*May 7, 2017 Spring 2017 November 30, 2017
Year 1 Monitoring December 1, 2017 November 2017 January 8, 2018
Year 2 Monitoring December 1, 2018 November 2018 December 31, 2018
Year 3 Monitoring December 1, 2019 November 2019 February 12, 2020
Year 4 Monitoring December 1, 2020 November 2020 February 11, 2021
Year 5 Monitoring December 1, 2021 November 2021 January 27, 2022
Year 6 Monitoring December 1, 2022 November 2022 January 30, 2023
Invasive Treatment May 5, 2022
Year 7 Monitoring December 1, 2023 Oct-23
Invasive Treatment June 8 and October 10, 2023
* Monitoring schedule completion dates updated based on completion of construction.
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Contact:
Table 3. Project Contacts
Construction Contractor
Planting Contractor
Contact:
Raleigh, NC 27607
Kee Mapping and Surveying, 828-575-9021Surveyers
Mellow Marsh Farm, 919-742-1200
ArborGen, 843-528-3204
Live Stakes Suppliers
Dykes and Son, 931-668-8833
Vegetation Monitoring Point of Contact
Stream Monitoring Point of Contact
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
Foggy Mountain Nursery, 336-384-5323
Seeding Contractor
Raleigh, NC 27607
Contact:
Stephen Carroll, Tel. [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27607
6105 Chapel Hill Road
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Designer
Cary, NC 27518
Contact:
Stephen Carroll, Tel. [phone]
6105 Chapel Hill Road
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
River Works, Inc.
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
Katie McKeithan, Tel. [phone]
Seed Mix Sources
6105 Chapel Hill Road
Stephen Carroll, Tel. [phone]
Green Resources, Rodney Montgomery 336-215-3458
River Works, Inc.
Monitoring Performers
Nursery Stock Suppliers
River Works, Inc.
Katie McKeithan, Tel. [phone]
Katie McKeithan, Tel. [phone]
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
Cary, NC 27518
Contact:
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Project Name
County
Project Area (acres)
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
Physiographic Province
River Basin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit and 14-digit
NCDWR Sub-basin
Project Drainage Area (acres)
Project Drainage Area Percent Impervious
CGIA Land Use Classification
Parameters Reach R1 Reach R4 Reach R5
Length of Reach (linear feet) 1,290 1,296 536
Valley Classification (Rosgen) VII VII VII
Drainage Area (acres) 438 138/95 24
NCDWR Stream Identification Score 35.5 41.5/25 28.5
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
Morphological Description
(Rosgen stream type)
Evolutionary Trend Incised EGcFGFBcG
Underlying Mapped Soils CnA CnA, CkC CkC
Drainage Class Somewhat Poorly Drained
Somewhat Poorly
Drained and Well
Drained
Well Drained
Soil Hydric Status Hydric Partially Hydric Upland
Average Channel Slope (ft/ft)0.0069 0.017 0.023
FEMA Classification N/A N/A N/A
Native Vegetation Community
Percent Composition of Exotic/Invasive Vegetation 25%<5%<5%
Parameters Reach R6 Reach T3 Reach T4
Length of Reach (linear feet)442 70 117
Valley Classification (Rosgen)VII VII VII
Drainage Area (acres)61 41 10
NCDWR Stream Identification Score 18 19 -
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
Morphological Description
(Rosgen stream type)
Evolutionary Trend BcGFEGF
Underlying Mapped Soils CkC CnA CkC
Drainage Class Well Drained Somewhat Poorly
Drained Well Drained
Soil Hydric Status Upland Hydric Upland
Average Channel Slope (ft/ft)0.014 0.02 -
FEMA Classification N/A N/A N/A
Native Vegetation Community
Percent Composition of Exotic/Invasive Vegetation 5%10%10%
Applicable
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Project Information
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project
Guilford
20.2
Table 4. Project Attributes
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
36.237 N, -79.749 W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Piedmont
Cape Fear
03030002 / 03030002010020
3/6/2001
438
1%
2.01.01.01, 2.03.01, 2.99.01, 3.02 / Forest (53%) Agriculture (39%) Impervious Cover (1%) Unclassified (7%)
Reach Summary Information
Reach R2 Reach R3
748 1,454
VII VII
299 242
35.5 41.5
C; NSW
E Bc incised Bc incised Gc Bc
BcGFBcGF
CnA CnA, PpE2
Somewhat Poorly Drained Somewhat Poorly Drained
and Well Drained
Hydric Partially Hydric
0.0068 0.0095
N/A N/A
Piedmont Headwater Stream Forest
15%5%
Reach T1 Reach T2
145 283
VII VII
55 47
26.75 27.25
C; NSW
Bc incised E incised F E incised -
EGFBcGF
CnA CnA, PpE2
Somewhat Poorly Drained Somewhat Poorly Drained
and Well Drained
Hydric Partially Hydric
0.024 0.022
N/A N/A
Piedmont Headwater Stream Forest
10%10%
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation Resolved Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States – Section 404 Yes Categorical Exclusion (Appendix B)
Waters of the United States – Section 401 Yes Categorical Exclusion (Appendix B)
Endangered Species Act N/A Categorical Exclusion (Appendix B)
Historic Preservation Act N/A Categorical Exclusion (Appendix B)
Essential Fisheries Habitat N/A Categorical Exclusion (Appendix B)
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)N/A Categorical Exclusion (Appendix B)
FEMA Floodplain Compliance N/A Categorical Exclusion (Appendix B)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

Appendix B

Visual Assessment Data

Figure 4.1Current ConditionsPlan View Browns Summit Site(DMS #96313)
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
$1
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0#0
#0
#0#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
!>
Reach R1
Reach T1
Reach R2 (upper)
Reach R3 (lower)
Reach T2
Reach R2 (lower)
VP13
405 stems/ac
VP11
486 stems/acVP12
445 stems/ac
BSFL 3
VP14
445 stems/ac
VP10
283 stems/ac
VP9
445 stems/ac
BSAW 2 did not meet
success criteriaWetland Area (Type 1)
Removed from Credit
XS-12
X10
XS-17
XS-16
XS-14
XS-11
XS-13
XS-15
BSAW2
BSAW3
BSAW4
BSAW5
BSAW6
BSAW7
PL16
PL15
PL14
PL13
PL12PL11
PL10
PL9PL8
PL7
PL6
PL5
PL4
PL3
PL2
PL1
Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user
community, Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS
User Community
E
0 250 500125
Feet
Conservation Easement
!>Flow Gauge
#0 Photo Location
$1 Crest Gauge
Vegetation Plots
Monitoring Wells
!.Pass
!.Fail
Cross Sections
Invaisive Treatment
Streams by Mitigation Type
Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
No Credit
Wetland Mitigation Types
1 - "Functioning", 3:1 credit ratio Rehabilitation
2 - Degraded, 1.5:1 credit ratio Rehabilitation
3 - Partially Functioning, 1.5:1 credit ratio Rehabilitation
4 - Filled, 1:1 credit ratio Reestablishment
5 - Hydrologic Reestablishment, 3.5:1 credit ratio
Figure 4.2Current ConditionsPlan View Browns Summit Site(DMS #96313)
!.
!.
!.
#0
#0 #0 #0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0#0 #0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
!>
!>
Reach R3 (upper)
Reach T3
Reach R4 (lower)
Reach R4 (upper)
Reach R6
Reach R5
Reach T4
BSFL2
BSFL1
Veg Plot 9
VP8
526 stems/ac
VP7
607 stems/ac
VP6
283 stems/ac
VP5
364 stems/ac
VP1
688 stems/ac
VP2
445 stems/ac
VP4
405 stems/ac
VP3
728 stems/ac
BSAW8
BSAW1
BSAW9
X1
X2 X3
X10
X5
X4
XS-11
X8
X7
X6
X9
PL38
PL37 PL36
PL35 PL34
PL39
PL33
PL32
PL31
PL30
PL29
PL28 PL27
PL26
PL25
PL24
PL23
PL22
PL21
PL20
PL19
PL18
PL17
PL16
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User
Community, NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and
Analysis, NC 911 Board
E
0 250 500125
Feet
Conservation Easement
!>Flow Gauge
#0 Photo Location
$1 Crest Gauge
Vegetation Plots
Monitoring Wells
!.Pass
!.Fail
Cross Sections
Streams by Mitigation Type
Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
No Credit
Wetland Adjustment (Type 3)
Wetlands by Mitigation Type
1 - "Functioning", 3:1 credit ratio Rehabilitation
2 - Degraded, 1.5:1 credit ratio Rehabilitation
3 - Partially Functioning, 1.5:1 credit ratio Rehabilitation
4 - Filled, 1:1 credit ratio Reestablishment
5 - Hydrologic Reestablishment, 3.5:1 credit ratio
Reach ID R1
Assessed Length 1,290
1. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover
resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion
0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include
undercuts that are modest, appear
sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or
collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
2. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.20 20 100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the
sill.
11 11 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial
flow underneath sills or arms.20 20 100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table
in EEP monitoring guidance
document)
20 20 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures
maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth :
Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some
cover at base-flow.
20 20 100%
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Number of
Unstable
Segments
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Totals
Adjusted % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub-
Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Reach ID R2 (downstream section)
Assessed Length 134
1. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover
resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion
0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include
undercuts that are modest, appear
sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or
collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
2. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.0 0 100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the
sill.
0 0 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial
flow underneath sills or arms.0 0 100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table
in EEP monitoring guidance
document)
0 0 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures
maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth :
Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some
cover at base-flow.
0 0 100%
Totals
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub-
Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Table 5 continued. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Reach ID R2 (upstream section)
Assessed Length 614
1. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover
resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion
0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include
undercuts that are modest, appear
sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or
collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
2. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.5 5 100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the
sill.
3 3 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial
flow underneath sills or arms.5 5 100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table
in EEP monitoring guidance
document)
5 5 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures
maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth :
Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some
cover at base-flow.
5 5 100%
Totals
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub-
Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Table 5 continued. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Reach ID R3 (downstream section)
Assessed Length 352
1. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover
resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion
0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include
undercuts that are modest, appear
sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or
collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
2. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.7 7 100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the
sill.
3 3 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial
flow underneath sills or arms.7 7 100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table
in EEP monitoring guidance
document)
7 7 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures
maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth :
Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some
cover at base-flow.
7 7 100%
Totals
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Adjusted % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub-
Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Table 5 continued. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Reach ID R3 (upstream section)
Assessed Length 1,102
1. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover
resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion
0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include
undercuts that are modest, appear
sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or
collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
2. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.15 15 100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the
sill.
10 10 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial
flow underneath sills or arms.15 15 100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table
in EEP monitoring guidance
document)
15 15 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures
maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth :
Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some
cover at base-flow.
15 15 100%
Totals
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Adjusted % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub-
Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Table 5 continued. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Reach ID R4
Assessed Length 1,296
1. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover
resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion
0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include
undercuts that are modest, appear
sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or
collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
2. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.14 14 100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the
sill.
4 4 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial
flow underneath sills or arms.14 14 100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table
in EEP monitoring guidance
document)
14 14 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures
maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth :
Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some
cover at base-flow.
14 14 100%
Totals
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Adjusted % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub-
Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Table 5 continued. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Reach ID R5
Assessed Length 536
1. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover
resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion
0 0 100%
*2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include
undercuts that are modest, appear
sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or
collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
2. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.6 6 100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the
sill.
6 6 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial
flow underneath sills or arms.6 6 100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table
in EEP monitoring guidance
document)
6 6 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures
maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth :
Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some
cover at base-flow.
6 6 100%
Totals
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub-
Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Table 5 continued. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Reach ID R6
Assessed Length 442
1. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover
resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion
0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include
undercuts that are modest, appear
sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or
collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
2. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.9 9 100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the
sill.
9 9 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial
flow underneath sills or arms.9 9 100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table
in EEP monitoring guidance
document)
9 9 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures
maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth :
Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some
cover at base-flow.
9 9 100%
Totals
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub-
Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Table 5 continued. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Reach ID T1
Assessed Length 145
1. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover
resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion
0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include
undercuts that are modest, appear
sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or
collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
2. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.6 6 100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the
sill.
6 6 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial
flow underneath sills or arms.6 6 100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table
in EEP monitoring guidance
document)
6 6 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures
maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth :
Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some
cover at base-flow.
6 6 100%
Totals
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub-
Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Table 5 continued. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Reach ID T2
Assessed Length 283
1. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover
resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion
0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include
undercuts that are modest, appear
sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or
collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
2. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.2 2 100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the
sill.
2 2 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial
flow underneath sills or arms.2 2 100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table
in EEP monitoring guidance
document)
2 2 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures
maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth :
Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some
cover at base-flow.
2 2 100%
Totals
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub-
Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Table 5 continued. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Reach ID T3
Assessed Length 70
1. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover
resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion
0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include
undercuts that are modest, appear
sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or
collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
2. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.1 1 100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the
sill.
1 1 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial
flow underneath sills or arms.1 1 100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table
in EEP monitoring guidance
document)
1 1 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures
maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth :
Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some
cover at base-flow.
1 1 100%
Totals
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub-
Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Table 5 continued. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Reach ID T4
Assessed Length 117
1. Bank 1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover
resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion
0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include
undercuts that are modest, appear
sustainable and are providing
habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or
collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
2. Engineered
Structures 1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.8 8 100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the
sill.
8 8 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial
flow underneath sills or arms.8 8 100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table
in EEP monitoring guidance
document)
8 8 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures
maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth :
Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some
cover at base-flow.
8 8 100%
Totals
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub-
Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Table 5 continued. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Planted Acreage1 20.24
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both
woody and herbaceous
material.
0.1 acres N/A 0 0.00 0.0%
2. Low Stem Density
Areas
Woody stem densities
clearly below target levels
based on MY3, 4, or 5
stem count criteria.
0.1 acres N/A 0 0.00 0.0%
0 0.00 0.0%
3. Areas of Poor
Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of
a size class that are
obviously small given the
monitoring year.
0.25 acres N/A 0 0.00 0.0%
0 0.00 0.0%
Easement Acreage2 20.24
4. Invasive Areas of
Concern4
Areas or points (if too small to
render as polygons at map
scale).
1000 SF N/A 0 0.00 0.0%
5. Easement
Encroachment Areas3
Areas or points (if too small to
render as polygons at map
scale).
none N/A 0 0.00 0.0%
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Easement
Acreage
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Vegetation Category Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Table 6. Vegetation Conditions Assessment
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Total
Cumulative Total
Vegetation Category Definitions
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of Planted
Acreage
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree
stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage, crossings or any other elements not directly
planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In
the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment, the associated acreage should be tallied
in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement
acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are those with the potential to directly outcompete
native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing,
more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes that are slightly longer (e.g. 1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those
species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity,
but can be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth
of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration of risk factors by EEP such as
species present, their coverage, distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest
amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in
the herb layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree/shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and
the potential impacts of treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of
interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics are of particular interest given their
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project – Stream Stations Photos
Photos take October 31, 2023 (All photos are viewing upstream)

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

Photo Point 1 – Station 63+75, Reach 1 Photo Point 2 – Station 61+50, Reach 1

Photo Point 3 – Station 58+75, Reach 1 Photo Point 4 – Station 57+85, Reach 1

Photo Point 5 – Station 56+75, Reach 1 Photo Point 6 – Station 55+00, Reach 1

Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project – Stream Stations Photos
Photos take October 31, 2023 (All photos are viewing upstream)

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

Photo Point 7 – Station 53+50, Reach 1 Photo Point 8 – Station 51+75, Reach 1

Photo Point 9 – Station 11+25, Reach T1 Photo Point 10 – Station 49+00, Reach 2

Photo Point 11 – Station 46+00, Reach 2 Photo Point 12 – Station 44+75, Reach 2

Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project – Stream Stations Photos
Photos take October 31, 2023 (All photos are viewing upstream)

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

Photo Point 13 – Station 43+75, Reach 2/Reach T2 Photo Point 14 – Station 42+25, Reach 3

Photo Point 15 – Station 41+50, Reach 3 Photo Point 16 – Station 36+25, Reach 3

Photo Point 17 – Station 36+00, Reach 3 Photo Point 18 – Station 35+00, Reach 3

Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project – Stream Stations Photos
Photos take October 31, 2023 (All photos are viewing upstream)

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

Photo Point 19 – Station 33+00, Reach 3 Photo Point 20 – Station 32+00, Reach 3

Photo Point 21 – 31+50, Reach 3 Photo Point 22 – Station 28+75, Reach 3/T3

Photo Point 23 – Station 10+25, Reach T3 Photo Point 24 – Station 26+50, Reach 4

Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project – Stream Stations Photos
Photos take October 31, 2023 (All photos are viewing upstream)

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

Photo Point 25 – Station 24+50, Reach 4 Photo Point 26 – Station 24+00, Reach 4

Photo Point 27 – Station 22+50, Reach 4 Photo Point 28 – Station 21+50, Reach 4/T4

Photo Point 29 – Station 11+00, Reach T4 Photo Point 30 – Station 19+50, Reach 4

Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project – Stream Stations Photos
Photos take October 31, 2023 (All photos are viewing upstream)

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

Photo Point 31 – Station 19+10, Step Pools Photo Point 32 – Station 18+00, Reach 4

Photo Point 33 – Station 16+75, Reach 4 Photo Point 34 – Sta. 15+75, Reaches 4, 5 and 6

Photo Point 35 – Station 15+00, Reach 6 Photo Point 36 – Station 14+50, Reach 6, BMP

Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project – Stream Stations Photos
Photos take October 31, 2023 (All photos are viewing upstream)

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

Photo Point 37 – Station 11+90, Reach 6 Photo Point 38 – Station 10+50, Reach 6, Step Pools

Photo Point 39 – Station 15+00, Reach 5

Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project – Additional Photos

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

Reach 1 bottom of the project (Asbuilt) Reach 1 bottom of the project (Year 7)

Reach 1 riffle with adjacent wetlands (Asbuilt)

Reach 2 Upper enhancement 1 (Asbuilt)
Reach 1 riffle with adjacent wetlands (Year 7)
Reach 2 Upper enhancement 1 (Year 7)

Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project – Additional Photos

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

Reach 3 Upper (Asbuilt) Reach 3 Upper (Year 7)

BMP on Reach 6 (Asbuilt)

Wetland on left floodplain of Reach 1 (Asbuilt)

BMP on Reach 6 (Year 7)
Wetland on left floodplain of Reach 1 (Year 7)

Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project – Vegetation Plot Photo Stations
Photos taken October 10, 2023
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

Vegetation Plot 1 Vegetation Plot 2

Vegetation Plot 3 Vegetation Plot 4

Vegetation Plot 5 Vegetation Plot 6

Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project – Vegetation Plot Photo Stations
Photos taken October 10, 2023
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

Vegetation Plot 7 Vegetation Plot 8

Vegetation Plot 9 Vegetation Plot 10

Vegetation Plot 11 Vegetation Plot 12
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project – Vegetation Plot Photo Stations
Photos taken October 10, 2023
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

Vegetation Plot 13 Vegetation Plot 14

Appendix C

Vegetation Plot Data

Table 7. CVS Density Per Plot
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
CVS Project Code 140048.  Project Name: Browns Summit
Planted Vol T Planted Vol T Planted Vol T Planted Vol T Planted Vol T Planted Vol T Planted Vol T Planted Vol T
Acer negundo Boxelder 113333 11
Acer rubrum Red maple 10 10 10 10 3 3 1 1
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder 33
Baccharis High‐tide Bush 22 11
Betula nigra River Birch 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 5 1 1
Callicarpa americana Beautyberry
Carpinus caroliniana Ironwood 332211 1111
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
Diospyros virginiana Possumwood 1 1 2 2
Euonymus americanus Strawberry‐bush 11
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 44222244332244426
Hamamelis virginiana Witch hazel 22
Ilex opaca American Holly
Ilex verticillata Winterberry 11
Juniperus virginiana Cedar 22
Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum, Red Gum 3 3 5 5 10 10 10 10
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip poplar 123 2 2 112 33347
Nyssa sylvatica Black Gum 11 11
Pinus echinata Shortleaf Pine 10 10 3 3 4 4
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 2 2 1 1 4 4 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 4 1 1
Quercus alba White Oak
Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak 1 1 1122
Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 2 2 1 1 11
Quercus phellos Willow Oak 22
Rhus copallinum Sumac
Salix nigra Black Willow 22
Sambucus canadensis Common Elderberry
Ulmus americana Elm 112 11
Viburnum dentatum Arrow‐wood
Viburnum nudum Southern Wild Raisin, Possumhaw 11
17 15 32 11 14 25 18 5 23 10 24 34 9 14 23 7 14 21 15 10 25 13 2 15
93115 38 8 196 49 5 473 58 8 49818
688 607 1295 445 567 1012 728 202 931 405 971 1376 364 567 931 283 567 850 607 405 1012 526 81 607
140048‐01‐0005
size (ares)1
size (ACRES)0.02
140048‐01‐0003 140048‐01‐0004
0.02
11
0.02 0.02
Scientific Name Common Name
140048‐01‐0001 140048‐01‐0002
Stem count
1
140048‐01‐0007
11
0.02
140048‐01‐0008140048‐01‐0006
1
0.020.02
1
0.02
Stems per ACRE
Current Plot Data (MY7 2023)
Species count
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Planted Vol T Planted Vol T Planted Vol T Planted Vol T Planted Vol T Planted Vol T Planted Vol T Planted Vol T
Acer negundo Boxelder 1 1 1 1 10 10 11 11
Acer rubrum Red maple 24 24 28 28
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder 33 11
Baccharis High‐tide Bush 33 44
Betula nigra River Birch 3 3 6 2 1 3 5 1 6 2 2 3 3 32 8 40 32 19 51
Callicarpa americana Beautyberry
Carpinus caroliniana Ironwood 1 1 2 2 11 11 14 14
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry 11
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
Diospyros virginiana Possumwood 1 11 11516516
Euonymus americanus Strawberry‐bush 1111
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 2 2 34 2 36 33 4 37
Hamamelis virginiana Witch hazel 2 2 1 1 5555
Ilex opaca American Holly 11
Ilex verticillata Winterberry 1111
Juniperus virginiana Cedar 22 22
Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum, Red Gum 2 2 1 1 31 31 20 20
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip poplar 710177916
Nyssa sylvatica Black Gum 11 11226666
Pinus echinata Shortleaf Pine 17 17 11 11
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 5 2 7 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 23 6 29 27 4 31
Quercus alba White Oak
Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak 2 21 1 2 13 9 110819
Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 11 22 77718
Quercus phellos Willow Oak 11 11 44415
Rhus copallinum Sumac 11
Salix nigra Black Willow 1 1 1 23134
Sambucus canadensis Common Elderberry 11 11
Ulmus americana Elm 1 1 1 1 4154 4
Viburnum dentatum Arrow‐wood 22
Viburnum nudum Southern Wild Raisin, Possumhaw 11 2255
11 4 16 7 3 10 12 2 14 11 1 12 10 1 11 11 1 13 162 112 274 175 110 285
628 5 15 8 295 15 6 167 1817152420 4 21
445 162 647 283 121 405 486 81 567 445 40 486 405 40 445 445 40 526 468 324 792
506 12 824
Planted Vol T Planted Vol T Planted Vol T
Acer negundo Boxelder 13 13 12 12 15 15
Acer rubrum Red maple
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder Color for Density
Baccharis High‐tide Bush Exceeds requirements by 10%
Betula nigra River Birch 26 26 29 29 33 33 Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Callicarpa americana Beautyberry 1 Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Carpinus caroliniana Ironwood 14 14 14 14 23 23 Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Celtis laevigata Sugarberry 3 3 3 3 4 4
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 1 1 1 1
Diospyros virginiana Possumwood 4 4 5 1 6 5 5
Euonymus americanus Strawberry‐bush 3 3 3 3 6 6
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 29 1 30 32 32 36 37
Hamamelis virginiana Witch hazel 5 5 6 6 8 8
Ilex opaca American Holly 5 5 5 5 10 10
Ilex verticillata Winterberry 111122
Juniperus virginiana Cedar
Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum, Red Gum
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip poplar 814227 1812 12
Nyssa sylvatica Black Gum 7 7 7 7 10 10
Pinus echinata Shortleaf Pine
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 23 4 27 23 1 24 29 29
Quercus alba White Oak 111111
Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak 11 11 12 12 15 15
Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 8 8 10 10 13 13
Quercus phellos Willow Oak 111111
Rhus copallinum Sumac
Salix nigra Black Willow
Sambucus canadensis Common Elderberry
Ulmus americana Elm 6 6 6 6 7 7
Viburnum dentatum Arrow‐wood 5 5 5 5 8 8
Viburnum nudum Southern Wild Raisin, Possumhaw 665566
179 20 199 187 4 191 244 0 246
20 4 21 20 4 21 20 0 21
517 12 575 705 12 552 705 0 711
14
0.35
14
0.35
MY5 (2021)140048‐01‐0014140048‐01‐0013
14
0.02 0.350.35
11
0.02
14
MY7 (2023)
MY2 (2018)MY1 (2017)
Annual Means
1
0.02
11
Annual Means
Scientific Name Common Name
Stem count
140048‐01‐0009 140048‐01‐0012140048‐01‐0011140048‐01‐0010
Current Plot Data (MY7 2023)
size (ares)
Stems per ACRE
size (ares)
size (ACRES)0.02 0.02
1
0.02
size (ACRES)
Species count
Species count
Stems per ACRE
MY3 (2019)
14
0.35
Scientific Name Common Name
Stem count
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Plot #
Riparian Buffer 
Stems1
Stream/ 
Wetland 
Stems2 Live Stakes Invasives Volunteers
3 Total4
Unknown 
Growth Form
1 n/a 17 0015 32 32
2 n/a 11 0014 25 25
3 n/a 18 005 23 23
4 n/a 10 0024 34 34
5 n/a 9 0014 23 23
6 n/a 7 0014 21 21
7 n/a 15 0010 25 25
8 n/a 13 002 15 15
9 n/a 11 004 15 15
10 n/a 7 003 10 10
11 n/a 12 002 14 14
12 n/a 11 001 12 12
13 n/a 10 001 11 11
14 n/a 11 001 12 12
Plot #
Stream/ 
Wetland 
Stems2 Volunteers3 Total4
Average Plot 
Height (Ft)
Success 
Criteria 
Met?
1 688 607 1295 14.8 Yes
2 445 567 1012 4.6 Yes
3 728 202 930 9.8 Yes
4 405 971 1376 6.1 Yes
5 364 567 931 8.2 Yes
6 283 567 850 4.7 Yes
7 607 405 1012 12.9 Yes
8 526 81 607 4.4 Yes
9 445 162 607 7.9 Yes
10 283 121 404 9.0 Yes
11 486 81 567 4.9 Yes
12 445 40 485 10.7 Yes
13 405 40 445 4.7 Yes
14 445 40 485 11.6 Yes
Project Avg 468 318 786 8.2 Yes
Stem Class characteristics
1Buffer Stems Native planted hardwood trees. Does NOT include shrubs. No pines. No vines.
2Stream/ Wetland
Stems Native planted woody stems. Includes shrubs, does NOT include live stakes. No vines
3Volunteers Native woody stems. Not planted. No vines.
4Total Planted + volunteer native woody stems. Includes live stakes. Excl. exotics. Excl. vines.
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
(per acre)
Table 8. Vegetation Plot Summary
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Browns Summit (#140048)
Year 7
Vegetation Plot Summary Information
Wetland/Stream Vegetation Totals
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

Appendix D

Stream Survey Data

Figure 5 Cross-sections
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C 2.4 7.0 0.4 0.7 19.4 1.0 6.6 795.43 795.55
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2023)
Permanent Cross-section 1
Looking at the Right BankLooking at the Left Bank
Note: Per DMS/IRT request, bank height ratio is calculated by setting the current bankfull area to match the asbuilt bankfull
area and dividing by the current max depth. Note: MY1 data is being utilized as asbuilt data due to poor quality asbuilt survey.
794
795
796
797
798
0 102030405060
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Browns Summit Restoration Site
Reach 4, Cross-section 1
As-built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 5 Year 7
MY7 BKF Bankfull Line
Floodprone
MY7 BKF= 795.55'
Thalweg = 794.76'
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 5 Cross-sections
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Pool -- 12.5 12.1 1.0 2.9 11.7 -- -- 793.70 793.67
Note: MY1 data is being utilized as asbuilt data due to poor quality asbuilt survey.
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2023)
Permanent Cross-section 2
Looking at the Right BankLooking at the Left Bank
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
0 102030405060
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Browns Summit Restoration Site
Reach 4, Cross-section 2
As-built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 5 Year 7
Bankfull Line Floodprone
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 5 Cross-sections
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C 6.0 8.9 0.7 1.2 13.3 0.9 7.3 791.82 791.79
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2023)
Permanent Cross-section 3
Looking at the Right BankLooking at the Left Bank
Note: Per DMS/IRT request, bank height ratio is calculated by setting the current bankfull area to match the asbuilt bankfull
area and dividing by the current max depth. Note: MY1 data is being utilized as asbuilt data due to poor quality asbuilt survey.
790
791
792
793
794
0 10203040506070
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Browns Summit Restoration Site
Reach 4, Cross-section 3
As-built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 5 Year 7
MY7 BKF Bankfull Line
Floodprone
Thalweg = 790.62'
MY7 BKF= 791.95'
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 5 Cross-sections
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C 5.5 8.6 0.6 1.1 13.4 1.0 7.9 789.04 789.120
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2023)
Permanent Cross-section 4
Looking at the Right BankLooking at the Left Bank
Note: Per DMS/IRT request, bank height ratio is calculated by setting the current bankfull area to match the asbuilt bankfull
area and dividing by the current max depth. Note: MY1 data is being utilized as asbuilt data due to poor quality asbuilt survey.
786.5
787
787.5
788
788.5
789
789.5
790
790.5
791
0 1020304050607080
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Browns Summit Restoration Site
Reach 4, Cross-section 4
As-built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 5 Year 7
MY7 BKF Bankfull Line
Floodprone
MY7 BKF= 789.17'
Thalweg = 787.97' 
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 5 Cross-sections
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C 8.2 12.6 0.7 1.1 19.3 0.9 5.4 785.57 785.47
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2023)
Permanent Cross-section 5
Looking at the Right BankLooking at the Left Bank
Note: Per DMS/IRT request, bank height ratio is calculated by setting the current bankfull area to match the asbuilt bankfull
area and dividing by the current max depth. Note: MY1 data is being utilized as asbuilt data due to poor quality asbuilt survey.
783.5
784
784.5
785
785.5
786
786.5
787
0 10203040506070
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Browns Summit Restoration Site
Reach 4, Cross-section 5
As-built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 5 Year 7
MY7 BKF Bankfull
Floodprone
MY7 BKF= 785.57'
Thalweg = 784.46'
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 5 Cross-sections
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Pool -- 16.2 12.3 1.3 2.8 9.4 -- -- 781.68 781.84
Note: MY1 data is being utilized as asbuilt data due to poor quality asbuilt survey.
Permanent Cross-section 6
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2023)
Looking at the Left Bank Looking at the Right Bank
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
0 102030405060708090
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Browns Summit Restoration Site
Reach 3, Cross-section 6
As-built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 5 Year 7
Bankfull Floodprone
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 5 Cross-sections
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C 4.9 9.5 0.5 1.1 18.6 1.0 9.4 781.42 781.49
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2023)
Permanent Cross-section 7
Looking at the Right BankLooking at the Left Bank
Note: Per DMS/IRT request, bank height ratio is calculated by setting the current bankfull area to match the asbuilt bankfull
area and dividing by the current max depth. Note: MY1 data is being utilized as asbuilt data due to poor quality asbuilt survey.
780
781
782
783
0 102030405060708090
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Browns Summit Restoration Site
Reach 3, Cross-section 7
As-built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 5 Year 7
MY7 BKF Bankfull
Floodprone
MY7 BKF= 781.55'
Thalweg = 780.28'
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 5 Cross-sections
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C 6.7 12.6 0.5 1.3 23.7 0.8 7.1 777.63 777.41
Looking at the Right BankLooking at the Left Bank
Note: Per DMS/IRT request, bank height ratio is calculated by setting the current bankfull area to match the asbuilt bankfull
area and dividing by the current max depth. Note: MY1 data is being utilized as asbuilt data due to poor quality asbuilt survey.
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2023)
Permanent Cross-section 8
775
776
777
778
779
780
0 102030405060708090
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Browns Summit Restoration Site
Reach 3, Cross-section 8
As-built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 5 Year 7
MY7 BKF Bankfull
Floodprone
MY7 BKF= 777.67'
Thalweg = 776.33'
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 5 Cross-sections
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Pool -- 17.2 14.3 1.2 2.4 12 -- -- 775.88 775.70
Looking at the Right BankLooking at the Left Bank
Note: MY1 data is being utilized as asbuilt data due to poor quality asbuilt survey.
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2023)
Permanent Cross-section 9
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
0 102030405060708090100
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Browns Summit Restoration Site
Reach 3, Cross-section 9
As-built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 5 Year 7
Bankfull Floodprone
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 5 Cross-sections
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C 7.1 11.8 0.6 1.2 19.6 1.0 4.9 773.83 773.79
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2023)
Permanent Cross-section 10
Looking at the Right BankLooking at the Left Bank
Note: Per DMS/IRT request, bank height ratio is calculated by setting the current bankfull area to match the asbuilt bankfull
area and dividing by the current max depth. Note: MY1 data is being utilized as asbuilt data due to poor quality asbuilt survey.
772
773
774
775
776
777
0 10203040506070
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Browns Summit Restoration Site
Reach 3, Cross-section 10
As-built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 5 Year 7
MY7 BKF Bankfull
FloodproneThalweg = 772.61'
MY7 BKF= 773.82'
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 5 Cross-sections
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C 6.2 9.3 0.7 1.2 14 1.0 7.0 771.76 771.97
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2023)
Permanent Cross-section 11
Looking at the Right BankLooking at the Left Bank
Note: Per DMS/IRT request, bank height ratio is calculated by setting the current bankfull area to match the asbuilt bankfull
area and dividing by the current max depth. Note: MY1 data is being utilized as asbuilt data due to poor quality asbuilt survey.
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
0 102030405060708090
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Browns Summit Restoration Site
Reach 3, Cross-section 11
As-built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 5 Year 7
MY5 BKF Bankfull Line
Floodprone
MY7 BKF= 771.94'
Thalweg = 770.52'
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 5 Cross-sections
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C 2.3 5 0.5 0.9 10.8 1.1 6.4 763.82 764.02
(Year 7 Data - Collected October 2023)
Permanent Cross-section 12
Looking at the Right BankLooking at the Left Bank
Note: Per DMS/IRT request, bank height ratio is calculated by setting the current bankfull area to match the asbuilt bankfull
area and dividing by the current max depth. Note: MY1 data is being utilized as asbuilt data due to poor quality asbuilt survey.
762
763
764
765
766
767
0 1020304050
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Browns Summit Restoration Site
Reach T1, Cross-section 12
As-built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 5 Year 7
MY7 BKF Bankfull
Floodprone
MY7 BKF= 764.10'
Thalweg = 762.96'
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 5 Cross-sections
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Pool -- 18.2 11.3 1.6 2.7 7.0 -- -- 762.95 762.83
Note: MY1 data is being utilized as asbuilt data due to poor quality asbuilt survey.
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2023)
Permanent Cross-section 13
Looking at the Right BankLooking at the Left Bank
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
0 102030405060708090
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Browns Summit Restoration Site
Reach 1, Cross-section 13
As-built
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 5
Year 7
Bankfull
Floodprone
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 5 Cross-sections
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C 9.9 11.6 0.9 1.7 13.6 1.0 6.3 761.71 761.75
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2023)
Permanent Cross-section 14
Looking at the Right BankLooking at the Left Bank
Note: Per DMS/IRT request, bank height ratio is calculated by setting the current bankfull area to match the asbuilt bankfull
area and dividing by the current max depth. Note: MY1 data is being utilized as asbuilt data due to poor quality asbuilt survey.
759
760
761
762
763
764
0 1020304050607080
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Browns Summit Restoration Site
Reach 1, Cross-section 14
As-built
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 5
Year 7
MY7 BKF
Bankfull Line
Floodprone
MY7 BKF= 761.90'
Thalweg = 760.00'
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 5 Cross-sections
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Pool -- 9.4 12.9 0.7 1.5 17.7 -- -- 760.52 760.81
Note: MY1 data is being utilized as asbuilt data due to poor quality asbuilt survey.
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2023)
Permanent Cross-section 15
Looking at the Right BankLooking at the Left Bank
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
0 102030405060708090100
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Browns Summit Restoration Site
Reach 1, Cross-section 15
As-built
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 5
Year 7
Floodprone
Bankfull
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 5 Cross-sections
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C 10.9 12.5 0.9 1.8 14.4 0.9 5.7 759.53 759.52
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2023)
Permanent Cross-section 16
Looking at the Right BankLooking at the Left Bank
Note: Per DMS/IRT request, bank height ratio is calculated by setting the current bankfull area to match the asbuilt bankfull
area and dividing by the current max depth. Note: MY1 data is being utilized as asbuilt data due to poor quality asbuilt survey.
757
758
759
760
761
762
0 1020304050607080
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Browns Summit Restoration Site
Reach 1, Cross-section 16
As-built
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 5
Year 7
MY7 BKF
Bankfull
MY7 BKF= 759.63'
Thalweg = 757.77'
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 5 Cross-sections
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
Depth W/D BH Ratio ER BKF Elev TOB Elev
Riffle C 10.4 11.9 0.9 1.4 13.5 1.0 5.8 758.65 758.90
(Year 7 Data - Collected September 2023)
Permanent Cross-section 17
Looking at the Right BankLooking at the Left Bank
Note: Per DMS/IRT request, bank height ratio is calculated by setting the current bankfull area to match the asbuilt bankfull
area and dividing by the current max depth. Note: MY1 data is being utilized as asbuilt data due to poor quality asbuilt survey.
756
757
758
759
760
761
0 10203040506070
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Browns Summit Restoration Site
Reach 1, Cross-section 17
As-built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 5 Year 7
MY7 BKF Bankfull
Floodprone
MY7 BKF= 758.97'
Thalweg = 757.70'
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT, DMS PROJECT NO. 96313
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
BF Width (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 12.3 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 12.9 ---- ---- ----- ----- 12.6 13.0 12.6 13.8 0.6 3
Floodprone Width (ft)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- >100 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- >100 ---- ---- ----- -----100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 3
BF Mean Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.3 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.2 ---- ---- ----- ----- 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.2 0.1 3
BF Max Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.1 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.5 ---- ---- ----- ----- 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 0.0 3
BF Cross-sectional Area (ft²) ----- 12.0 16.5 ----- ----- 16.3 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 15.2 ---- ---- ----- ----- 12.5 13.4 13.2 14.5 0.8 3
Width/Depth Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 9.3 ----- ----- ----- ----- 10 ----- ----- 12 ----- ----- ----- 11.0 ---- ---- ----- ----- 10.9 12.7 12.0 15.2 1.8 3
Entrenchment Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 8.7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- >2.2 ----- ----- ----- >6.7 ---- ---- ----- ----- 5.3 5.5 5.4 5.7 0.2 3
Bank Height Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 ----- ----- 1 ----- ----- ----- 1 ---- ---- ----- ----- 1 1 1 1 0 3
d50 (mm)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 50.0 ----- ----- 75.0 ----- ----- 72.6 88.2 75.3 136.9 24.7 5
Radius of Curvature (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 26.0 ----- ----- 39.0 ---------- 25.9 34.5 35.4 42.0 5.3 7
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2 ----- ----- 3 ----- ----- 2.0 ----- ----- 3.0 ----- ----- 2.0 2.7 2.7 3.2 0.4 7
Meander Wavelength (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 140 ----- ----- 170 ----- ----- 130.2 162.0 161.3 190.9 24.9 5
Meander Width Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 3.5 ----- ----- 10 ----- ----- 4 ----- ----- 6 ----- 5.6 6.8 5.8 10.5 1.9 5
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 5.4 20.5 13.0 47.7 14.6 13
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.013 ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.001 0.019 0.010 0.091 0.023 13
Pool Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 50 ----- ----- 87 ----- ----- 41.4 63.2 59.1 100.8 18.2 12
Pool Max Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.2 ----- ----- 2.5 ----- ----- ----- 2.7 ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 0.0 2
Pool Volume (ft3)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Substrate and Transport Parameters
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
SC% / Sa% / G% / B% / Be% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 ----- ----- ----- -----
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/ft² ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull (Rosgen Curve) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 114 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 88 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m² ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 25.7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 20.3 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM) ----- ----- 0.68 ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.68 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.68 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.68 ----- -----
Impervious cover estimate (%) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rosgen Classification ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- E ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- E5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- E5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- C ----- -----
BF Velocity (fps) ----- 3.6 4.1 ----- ----- 3.56 ----- ----- ----- ----- 4 ----- ----- 6 ----- ----- ----- 3.20 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Discharge (cfs) ----- 43.2 67.4 ----- ----- 58 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 49 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Valley Length ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----1086.6 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----1036.3 ----- -----
Channel length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----1217 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----1279.7 ----- -----
Sinuosity ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.12 ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.3 ----- ----- 1.6 ----- ----- ----- 1.40 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.2 ----- -----
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.0058 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.0058 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.0043 ----- -----
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H% / VH% / E% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Biological or Other ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Composite
USGS
Gauge Regional Curve*Pre-Existing Condition DesignReference Reach(es) Data
* 1999 Regional Cruve and Esitmate from Revised Regional Curve. See Mitigation Plan for more information.
As-built
0.3/0.5/0.8/5.8/10.2
Table 10. Baseline Stream Summary
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Parameter
Reach 1
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
BF Width (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 10.06 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 11.0 ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Floodprone Width (ft)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 22.1 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Mean Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.1 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.0 ---- ---- ----- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Max Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.3 ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Cross-sectional Area (ft²) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 11.1 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 11.1 ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Width/Depth Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 9.1 ----- ----- ----- ----- 10 ----- ----- 12 ----- ----- ----- 11 ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Entrenchment Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- >2.2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Bank Height Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2 ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 ----- ----- 1 ----- ----- ----- 1 ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
d50 (mm)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.6 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Radius of Curvature (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 22 ----- ----- 33.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2 ----- ----- 3 ----- ----- 2 ----- ----- 3.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Wavelength (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Width Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 3.5 ----- ----- 10 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Max Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.2 ----- ----- 2.5 ----- ----- ----- 2.2 ----- ---- ----- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Volume (ft3)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Substrate and Transport Parameters
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
SC% / Sa% / G% / B% / Be% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 ----- ----- ----- -----
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/ft² ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull (Rosgen Curve) ----- ----- ----- ----- -----100.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 90 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m² ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 20.4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 19.1 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Additional Reach Parameters -----
Drainage Area (SM) ----- ----- 0.47 ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.47 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.47 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.47 ----- -----
Impervious cover estimate (%) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rosgen Classification ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Bc ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- E5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- E5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Velocity (fps) ----- 3.50 4.03 ----- ----- 3.87 ----- ----- ----- ----- 4 ----- ----- 6 ----- ----- ----- 2.91 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Discharge (cfs) ----- 32.4 51.6 ----- ----- 43 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 32.3 ----- ----- ----- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- -----
Valley Length ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----643.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Channel length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----868.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Sinuosity ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.35 ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.3 ----- ----- 1.6 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.0054 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.0054 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H% / VH% / E% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Biological or Other ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Table 10 continued. Baseline Stream Summary
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Parameter Composite
USGS
Gauge Regional Curve*As-built
0.2/0.4/0.6/2.9/6.9
DesignPre-Existing Condition
* 1999 Regional Cruve and Esitmate from Revised Regional Curve. See Mitigation Plan for more information.
Reference Reach(es) Data
Reach 2
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
BF Width (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 8.5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 10.3 ---- ---- ----- ----- 9.3 10.7 10.9 11.6 0.9 4
Floodprone Width (ft)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 17.8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- >23 ---- ---- ----- ----- 51.6 73.4 76.1 89.9 15.7 4
BF Mean Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.15 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.9 ---- ---- ----- ----- 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.2 4
BF Max Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.2 ---- ---- ----- ----- 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 0.1 4
BF Cross-sectional Area (ft²) ----- 6.5 9.3 ----- ----- 9.7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 9.7 ---- ---- ----- ----- 6.8 7.9 7.6 9.8 1.2 4
Width/Depth Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 7.15 ----- ----- ----- ----- 10 ----- ----- 12 ----- ----- ----- 11.0 ---- ---- ----- ----- 10.8 15.0 15.1 19.2 3.9 4
Entrenchment Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- >2.2 ----- ----- ----- >2.2 ----- ---- ----- ----- 4.4 6.9 7.5 8.2 1.5 4
Bank Height Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2 ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 ----- ----- 1 ----- ----- ----- 1 ----- ---- ----- ----- 1 1 1 1 0 4
d50 (mm)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 35 ----- ----- 56.0 ----- ----- 37.4 54.0 59.9 64.7 11.9 3
Radius of Curvature (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 20 ----- ----- 30.0 ----- ----- 20.0 27.8 25.8 37.2 6.3 10
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2 ----- ----- 3 ----- ----- 2 ----- ----- 3.0 ----- ----- 1.9 2.6 2.4 3.5 0.6 10
Meander Wavelength (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 90 ----- -----130.0 ----- ----- 90.4 108.9 101.0 137.2 17.2 5
Meander Width Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 3.5 ----- ----- 10 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- 3.5 5.1 5.6 6.1 1.1 3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.018 ----- ---- ----- ----- 0.005 0.021 0.019 0.040 0.010 13
Pool Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 47 ----- ----- 70.0 ----- ----- 20.1 55.2 59.2 81.3 18.3 13
Pool Max Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.2 ----- ----- 2.5 ----- ----- ----- 2 ----- ---- ----- ----- 1.3 1.8 1.8 2.2 0.5 2
Pool Volume (ft3)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Substrate and Transport Parameters
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
SC% / Sa% / G% / B% / Be% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 ----- ----- ----- -----
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/ft² ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull (Rosgen Curve) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 141 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 116 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m² ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 30.7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 26.2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Additional Reach Parameters -----
Drainage Area (SM) ----- ----- 0.38 ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.38 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.38 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.38 ----- -----
Impervious cover estimate (%) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rosgen Classification ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Bc ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- E5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- E5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ---------- ----- C ----- -----
BF Velocity (fps) ----- 3.42 3.97 ----- ----- 3.5 ----- ----- ----- ----- 4 ----- ----- 6 ----- ----- ----- 3.3 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Discharge (cfs) ----- 25.7 41.7 ----- ----- 34.5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 31.9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Valley Length ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----1441.8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----1323.2 ----- -----
Channel length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----1586.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----1495.2 ----- -----
Sinuosity ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.10 ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.3 ----- ----- 1.6 ----- ----- ----- 1.20 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.13 ----- -----
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.0082 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.0082 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.010 ----- -----
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H% / VH% / E% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Biological or Other ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Table 10 continued. Baseline Stream Summary
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Reach 3
Parameter USGS
Gauge Design
0.1/0.2/0.4/10.4/22.4
Regional Curve*Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data As-built
* 1999 Regional Cruve and Esitmate from Revised Regional Curve. See Mitigation Plan for more information.
Composite
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
BF Width (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 7.60 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 9.2 / 8.1 ----- ----- ----- ----- 7.2 9.3 9.1 11.8 1.7 4
Floodprone Width (ft)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 9.1 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- >19 / >17 ----- ----- ----- ----- 31.3 57.9 66.0 68.1 15.4 4
BF Mean Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.86 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.7 / 0.6 ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.5 0.8 0.9 1.1 0.2 4
BF Max Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.39 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.9 / 0.8 ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.8 1.4 1.5 1.7 0.3 4
BF Cross-sectional Area (ft²) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 6.5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 6.5 / 5.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- 3.3 7.7 7.4 12.7 3.4 4
Width/Depth Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 8.8 ----- ----- ----- ----- 10.0 ----- ----- 14.0 ----- ----- ----- 13.0 ----- ---- ----- ----- 11.0 12.3 11.3 15.4 1.8 4
Entrenchment Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- >2.2 ----- ----- ----- >2.2 ----- ---- ----- ----- 4.4 5.9 5.8 7.6 1.3 3
Bank Height Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 ----- ----- 1 ----- ----- ----- 1 ----- ---- ----- ----- 1 1 1 1 0 3
d50 (mm)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 30-42/22-43 ----- --------- ----- 36.9 43.0 42.8 49.7 4.7 4
Radius of Curvature (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2 ----- ----- 3 ----- ----- ----- 18-28/16-25 ----- ----- ---------- 17.2 24.5 25.1 34.3 4.9 10
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 3.1 / 2.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.8 2.6 2.7 3.7 0.5 10
Meander Wavelength (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----120.0 / 80.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- 63.1 94.5 93.0 123.0 20.2 9
Meander Width Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 3.5 ----- ----- 8 ----- ----- ----- 12.0 / 2.7 ----- ----- ----- ----- 4.0 4.6 4.6 5.3 0.5 4
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.019 ----- ---- ----- ----- 0.013 0.021 0.018 0.036 0.008 7
Pool Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 36-64/29-52 ----- ---- ----- ----- 31.2 58.1 56.1 87.8 18.7 6
Pool Max Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.0 / 1.9 ----- ---- ---------- 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 1
Pool Volume (ft3)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Substrate and Transport Parameters
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
SC% / Sa% / G% / B% / Be% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 ----- ----- ----- -----
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/ft² ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull (Rosgen Curve) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 208 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 141 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m² ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 45.1 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 30.7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Additional Reach Parameters ----- -----
Drainage Area (SM) ----- ----- 0.22 ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.22 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.22 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.22 ----- -----
Impervious cover estimate (%) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rosgen Classification ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Gc ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- C5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- C5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ---------- ----- E ----- -----
BF Velocity (fps) ----- 3.29 3.90 ----- ----- 3.69 ----- ----- ----- ----- 3.5 ----- ----- 5.0 ----- ----- ----- 3.8 / 4.1 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Discharge (cfs) ----- 17.9 29.8 ----- ----- 24 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 24.8 / 21.1 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Valley Length ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----1173.9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----1173.9 ----- -----
Channel length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----1350.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----1263.4 ----- -----
Sinuosity ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.15 ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.2 ----- ----- 1.5 ----- ----- ----- 1.13/1.22 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.08 ----- -----
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.016 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.011 / 0.016 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.0 ----- -----
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H% / VH% / E% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Biological or Other ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Regional Curve*Pre-Existing Condition
* 1999 Regional Cruve and Esitmate from Revised Regional Curve. See Mitigation Plan for more information.
USGS
Gauge
Reach 4
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
0.2/0.3/0.4/0.9/1.8
Parameter Reference Reach(es) Data
Composite
As-built
Table 10 continued. Baseline Stream Summary
Design (lower/upper)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
BF Width (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 7.38 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Floodprone Width (ft)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 11.8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Mean Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.44 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Max Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.67 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Cross-sectional Area (ft²) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 3.2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Width/Depth Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 16.77 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Entrenchment Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.6 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Bank Height Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 6 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- -----
d50 (mm)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Radius of Curvature (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Wavelength (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Width Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Max Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Volume (ft3)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Substrate and Transport Parameters
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
SC% / Sa% / G% / B% / Be% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 ----- ----- ----- -----
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/ft² ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull (Rosgen Curve) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m² ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Additional Reach Parameters ----- -----
Drainage Area (SM) ----- ----- 0.04 ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.04 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.04 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.04 ----- -----
Impervious cover estimate (%) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rosgen Classification ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Bc ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Velocity (fps) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 3.97 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Discharge (cfs) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 12.7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Valley Length ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----470.2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 470 ----- -----
Channel length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----536.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 520 ----- -----
Sinuosity ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.14 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.11 ----- -----
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.017 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H% / VH% / E% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Biological or Other ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Reference Reach(es) Data Design
* 1999 Regional Cruve and Esitmate from Revised Regional Curve. See Mitigation Plan for more information.
----
Reach 5
USGS
Gauge Regional Curve*Parameter Pre-Existing Condition As-built
Composite
Table 10 continued. Baseline Stream Summary
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
BF Width (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 9.09 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 6.1 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Floodprone Width (ft)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 12.7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 13.0 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Mean Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.48 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.5 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Max Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.6 ----- ---- ----- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Cross-sectional Area (ft²) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 4.4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 3.1 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Width/Depth Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 18.94 ----- ----- ----- ----- 12.0 ----- ----- 18.0 ----- ----- ----- 14.0 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Entrenchment Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.4 ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.4 ----- ----- 2.2 ----- ----- ----- <2.2 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Bank Height Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 ----- ----- 1 ----- ----- ----- 1 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
d50 (mm)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Radius of Curvature (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Wavelength (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Width Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.06 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 30 ----- ----- 54.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Max Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.7 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Volume (ft3)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Substrate and Transport Parameters
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
SC% / Sa% / G% / B% / Be% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 ----- ----- ----- -----
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/ft² ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull (Rosgen Curve) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m² ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Additional Reach Parameters ----- -----
Drainage Area (SM) ----- ----- 0.10 ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.10 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.10 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.10 ----- -----
Impervious cover estimate (%) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rosgen Classification ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Bc ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- B5c ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- B5c ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Velocity (fps) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 3.75 ----- ----- ----- ----- 4 ----- ----- 6.0 ----- ----- ----- 5.2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Discharge (cfs) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 16.5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 16 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Valley Length ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----468.2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Channel length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----501.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----468.2 ----- -----
Sinuosity ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.07 ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.1 ----- ----- 1.3 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.014 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.016 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H% / VH% / E% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Biological or Other ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Composite
Reference Reach(es) Data
Reach 6
USGS
Gauge
Table 10 continued. Baseline Stream Summary
Regional Curve*Pre-Existing Condition Design As-built
0.2/0.3/0.4/0.9/1.8
* 1999 Regional Cruve and Esitmate from Revised Regional Curve. See Mitigation Plan for more information.
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Parameter
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
BF Width (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 6.80 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 7.0 ----- ---- ----- ----- 7.7 7.7 7.77.70.01
Floodprone Width (ft)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 89.1 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- 39.9 39.9 39.9 39.9 0.0 1
BF Mean Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.67 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.5 ----- ---- ----- ----- 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.0 1
BF Max Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.53 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.7 ----- ---- ----- ----- 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.0 1
BF Cross-sectional Area (ft²) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 4.5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 3.8 ----- ---- ----- ----- 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 0.0 1
Width/Depth Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 10.15 ----- ----- ----- ----- 10.0 ----- ----- 14.0 ----- ----- ----- 13.0 ----- ---- ----- ----- 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7 0.0 1
Entrenchment Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 13.1 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- >2.2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 0.0 1
Bank Height Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2 ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 ----- ----- 1 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- 1 1 1 1 0 1
d50 (mm)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- 29.6 29.6 29.6 29.6 0.0 1
Radius of Curvature (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 14 ----- ----- 21.0 ----- ----- 16.3 17.4 17.4 18.5 1.1 2
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2 ----- ----- 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.4 0.1 2
Meander Wavelength (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 60.0 ----- ---- ----- ----- 56.0 57.9 57.9 59.7 1.8 2
Meander Width Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 3.5 ----- ----- 8 ----- ----- ----- 4.0 ----- ---- ----- ----- 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 0.0 1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.029 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 27 ----- ----- 35.0 ----- ----- 18.2 23.8 26.6 34.6 7.6 3
Pool Max Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.2 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Volume (ft3)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Substrate and Transport Parameters
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
SC% / Sa% / G% / B% / Be% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/ft² ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull (Rosgen Curve) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m² ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Additional Reach Parameters ----- -----
Drainage Area (SM) ----- ----- 0.09 ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.09 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.09 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.09 ----- -----
Impervious cover estimate (%) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rosgen Classification ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- E ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- C5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- C5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Velocity (fps) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 3.76 ----- ----- ----- ----- 3.5 ----- ----- 5.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Discharge (cfs) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 16.9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Valley Length ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----114.2 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----114.2 ----- -----
Channel length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----121.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----139.6 ----- -----
Sinuosity ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.06 ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.2 ----- ----- 1.5 ----- ----- ----- 1.12 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.22 ----- -----
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.024 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.019 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H% / VH% / E% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Biological or Other ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Composite
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
As-builtRegional Curve*Parameter
Table 10 continued. Baseline Stream Summary
Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) DataUSGS
Gauge
Reach T1
Design
* 1999 Regional Cruve and Esitmate from Revised Regional Curve. See Mitigation Plan for more information.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
BF Width (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 18.00 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- -----
Floodprone Width (ft)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 23.4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Mean Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.22 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Max Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.78 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Cross-sectional Area (ft²) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 4.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Width/Depth Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 81.82 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Entrenchment Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.3 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Bank Height Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- -----
d50 (mm)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Radius of Curvature (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Wavelength (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Width Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Max Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Volume (ft3)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Substrate and Transport Parameters
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
SC% / Sa% / G% / B% / Be% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/ft² ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull (Rosgen Curve) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m² ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Additional Reach Parameters ----- -----
Drainage Area (SM) ----- ----- 0.07 ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.07 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.07 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.07 ----- -----
Impervious cover estimate (%) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rosgen Classification ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Velocity (fps) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 3.6 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Discharge (cfs) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 14.4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Valley Length ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----252.7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----252.7 ----- -----
Channel length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----283.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----284.2 ----- -----
Sinuosity ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.12 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.12 ----- -----
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.022 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H% / VH% / E% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Biological or Other ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
* 1999 Regional Cruve and Esitmate from Revised Regional Curve. See Mitigation Plan for more information.
Regional Curve*Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design As-built
Composite
Reach T2
Table 10 continued. Baseline Stream Summary
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Parameter USGS
Gauge
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
BF Width (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.93 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 5.8 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Floodprone Width (ft)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 66.5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 15.0 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Mean Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.12 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.5 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Max Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.76 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.6 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Cross-sectional Area (ft²) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 3.3 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.8 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Width/Depth Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.62 ----- ----- ----- ----- 12.0 ----- ----- 18.0 ----- ----- ----- 12.0 ----- ---- ----- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- -----
Entrenchment Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 22.7 ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.4 ----- ----- 2.2 ----- ----- ----- <2.2 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Bank Height Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2 ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 ----- ----- 1 ----- ----- ----- 1 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
d50 (mm)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Radius of Curvature (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2 ----- ----- 3.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Wavelength (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Width Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.033 ----- ---- ----- ----- 0.017 0.025 0.017 0.017 0.007 2
Pool Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 36 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Max Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.9 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Volume (ft3)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Substrate and Transport Parameters
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
SC% / Sa% / G% / B% / Be% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/ft² ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull (Rosgen Curve) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m² ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Additional Reach Parameters -----
Drainage Area (SM) ----- ----- 0.06 ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.06 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.06 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.06 ----- -----
Impervious cover estimate (%) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rosgen Classification ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- E ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- B5c ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- B5c ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Velocity (fps) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 3.6 ----- ----- ----- ----- 4 ----- ----- 6.0 ----- ----- ----- 2.3 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---------- ----- ----- -----
BF Discharge (cfs) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 11.7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 6.4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Valley Length ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 44.3 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---------- ----- 80.5 ----- -----
Channel length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 47.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 88.0 ----- -----
Sinuosity ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.06 ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.1 ----- ----- 1.3 ----- ----- ----- 1.20 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.09 ----- -----
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.02 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.014 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H% / VH% / E% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Biological or Other ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
USGS
Gauge Regional Curve*Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data
Table 10 continued. Baseline Stream Summary
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Reach T3
Parameter As-builtCompositeDesign
* 1999 Regional Cruve and Esitmate from Revised Regional Curve. See Mitigation Plan for more information.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
BF Width (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 5.8 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Floodprone Width (ft)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 12.0 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Mean Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.5 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Max Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.6 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Cross-sectional Area (ft²) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 2.8 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Width/Depth Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 12.0 ----- ----- 18.0 ----- ----- ----- 12.0 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Entrenchment Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.4 ----- ----- 2.2 ----- ----- ----- <2.2 ----- ---- ----- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- -----
Bank Height Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 ----- ----- 1 ----- ----- ----- 1 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
d50 (mm)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Radius of Curvature (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Wavelength (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Meander Width Ratio ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.051 ----- ---- ----- ----- 0.007 0.047 0.048 0.072 0.023 11
Pool Length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool to Pool Spacing (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 14 ----- ---- ----- ----- 12.3 16.1 14.6 21.6 3.5 11
Pool Max Depth (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.9 ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Pool Volume (ft3)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Substrate and Transport Parameters
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
SC% / Sa% / G% / B% / Be% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/ft² ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull (Rosgen Curve) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m² ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Impervious cover estimate (%) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Rosgen Classification ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- B5c ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- B5c ----- ----- ----- ---------- ----- ----- B5c ----- -----
BF Velocity (fps) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 4 ----- ----- 6.0 ----- ----- ----- 3.7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF Discharge (cfs) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 10.4 ----- ----- ----- ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Valley Length ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----117.0 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----143.34 ----- -----
Channel length (ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----119.18 ----- -----
Sinuosity ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 1.1 ----- ----- 1.3 ----- ----- ----- 1.20 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.8314497 ----- -----
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 0.047 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BF slope (ft/ft) ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H% / VH% / E% ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Biological or Other ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
* 1999 Regional Cruve and Esitmate from Revised Regional Curve. See Mitigation Plan for more information.
Reach T4
Parameter USGS
Gauge Regional Curve*Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design As-builtComposite
Table 10 continued. Baseline Stream Summary
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Table 11a. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Stream Reach
Dimension and substrate Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY7
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
BF Width (ft)7.2 8.1 7.0 7.0 - 6.3 7.0 11.6 12.8 12.3 14.30 - 14.30 12.10 9.5 12.49 10.6 11.0 - 9.6 8.9
BF Mean Depth (ft)0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 - 0.4 0.4 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.8 - 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.58 0.7 0.6 - 0.7 0.7
Width/Depth Ratio 15.4 19.4 16.5 19.6 - 16.3 19.4 12.7 15.6 14.4 18.3 - 16.5 11.7 11 21.5 16.1 19.2 - 13.6 13.3
BF Cross-sectional Area (ft²)3.3 3.4 3.0 2.5 - 2.4 2.4 10.5 10.5 10.5 11.1 - 12.4 12.5 8.2 7.25 6.9 6.3 - 6.7 6
BF Max Depth (ft)0.8 0.9 0.7 0.6 - 0.7 0.7 2 2.5 2.7 2.6 - 2.8 2.9 1.6 1.21 1.1 1.2 - 1.3 1.2
Width of Floodprone Area (ft)31.3 58.8 46.3 45.7 - 45.7 45.8 -------66.2 66.1 65.6 65.6 - 65.6 65.5
Entrenchment Ratio (MY1 will provide standard)*4.45.96.66.6-7.36.6-------7.05.36.25.9-6.97.3
Bank Height Ratio (MY1 will provide standard)*1 1.0 1.0 0.9 - 1.1 1.0 - ------ 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 - 0.9 0.9
Wetted Perimeter (ft)7.4 8.5 7.2 7.1 - 6.5 7.1 12.6 15.3 15.0 16.8 - 17.2 15.1 10.1 13.0 11.0 11.5 - 10.0 9.3
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 - 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 - 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.5 - 0.7 0.6
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft 2)- -
------ - - -- --- - - -- --
d50 (mm) - --------------------
Stream Reach
Dimension and substrate Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY7
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
BF Width (ft)8.7 9.16 8.8 8.8 - 8.9 8.6 11.8 10.93 11.6 14.5 - 10.4 12.6
12.5 12.9 12.4 12.7 - 12.1 12.3
11.2 11.5 9.7 9.3 -9.4 9.5
BF Mean Depth (ft)0.8 0.73 0.6 0.6 - 0.6 0.6 1.1 0.75 0.7 0.5 - 0.8 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.1 - 1.3 1.3 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 -0.5 0.5
Width/Depth Ratio 11.6 12.55 13.6 15.3 - 14.7 13.4 11 14.57 17.7 26.9 - 13.8 19.3
14 11.6 11.2 11.1 - 9.6 9.4
18.6 21.3 21.0 18.3 -18.3 18.6
BF Cross-sectional Area (ft²)6.6 6.72 5.6 5.0 - 5.4 5.5 12.7 8.18 7.5 7.8 - 7.8 8.2 11.2 14.4 13.7 14.5 - 15.3 16.2 6.8 6.2 4.5 4.8 -4.8 4.9
BF Max Depth (ft)1.4 1.0 1.0 0.9 - 1.0 1.1 1.7 1.08 1.1 1.0 - 1.0 1.1 1.3 2.4 2.2 2.2 - 2.4 2.8 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 -1.1 1.1
Width of Floodprone Area (ft)65.8 72.0 67.5 66.1 - 66.1 67.6 68.1 69.3 68.3 68.3 - 68.3 68.1
-------89.9 89.9 89.9 89.9 -89.9 89.9
Entrenchment Ratio (MY1 will provide standard)*7.6 7.4 7.7 7.5 - 7.4 7.9 5.8 6.3 5.9 4.7 - 6.6 5.4
-------8 7.8 9.3 9.7 -9.6 9.4
Bank Height Ratio (MY1 will provide standard)*1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 - 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 - 0.9 0.9
-------1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 -1.0 1.0
Wetted Perimeter (ft)9.4 6.94 9.2 9.1 - 9.3 9.1 12.8 11.47 12 14.9 - 10.8 13.1 13.0 13.92 13.4 13.7 - 13.7 14.2 11.6 11.8 10.1 9.6 -9.8 10.0
Hydraulic Radius (ft)0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 - 0.6 0.6 1.0 0.71 0.6 0.5 - 0.7 0.6 0.9 1.03 1.0 1.1 - 1.1 1.1 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.5 -0.5 0.5
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft 2)- - - ---- - - - -
--- - - - -
--- - - - -
---
d50 (mm)----------------------------
Stream Reach
Dimension and substrate Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY7
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
BF Width (ft) 10.60 10.05 9.8 9.5 - 13.9 12.6 17.60 15.3 14.5 15.1 - 15.6 14.3 11.60 11.5 10 10.3 - 8.9 11.8 9.30 11.7 10.5 9.7 - 9.5 9.3
BF Mean Depth (ft) 0.90 0.71 0.7 0.7 - 0.5 0.5 1.00 1.1 1.2 1.1 - 1.1 1.2 0.60 0.6 0.5 0.6 - 0.6 0.6 0.90 0.7 0.6 0.7 - 0.7 0.7
Width/Depth Ratio 11.5 14.15 15.1 13.5 - 28.3 23.7 17.7 13.5 12.1 13.7 - 14.0 12.0 19.2 19.2 20.8 17.9 - 14.3 19.6 10.8 17.2 18.5 14.5 - 13.1 14.0
BF Cross-sectional Area (ft²) 9.8 7.16 6.4 6.7 - 6.8 6.7 17.5 17.2 17.3 16.7 - 17.3 17.2 7.0 6.9 4.8 5.9 - 5.6 7.1 8.1 8.0 6.0 6.6 - 6.9 6.2
BF Max Depth (ft) 1.30 1.05 1.1 1.2 - 1.2 1.3 2.20 2.4 2.5 2.5 - 2.5 2.4 1.30 1.1 1 1.1 - 1.1 1.2 1.30 1.2 1.2 1.2 - 1.1 1.2
Width of Floodprone Area (ft) 86.6 89.5 88.3 87.1 - 87.1 89.5 -------51.6 67.5 50.9 52.3 - 52.3 57.8 65.6 87.3 65.2 65.7 - 65.7 65.5
Entrenchment Ratio (MY1 will provide standard)* 8.2 8.5 9.0 9.2 - 6.3 7.1 -------4.44.55.15.1-5.94.97.05.56.26.7-6.97.0
Bank Height Ratio (MY1 will provide standard)* 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 - 0.9 0.8 -------1.01.01.01.1-1.01.01.01.01.01.0-1.11.0
Wetted Perimeter (ft) 11.2 11.3 10.6 9.9 - 14.3 13.0 18.2 11.3 15.9 16.1 - 16.8 15.6 12.0 11.9 10.2 10.6 - 9.3 12.2 9.9 12.3 11.0 10.3 - 10.0 9.8
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.7 - 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.6 1.1 1.0 - 1.0 1.1 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 - 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.6 - 0.7 0.6
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft 2)- - - ---- - - - -
--- - - - -
--- - - - -
---
d50 (mm)----------------------------
Reach 4 Reach 3
Cross-section X-11 (Riffle)
*Per DMS/IRT request, bank height ratio is calculated by setting the current bankfull area to match the asbuilt bankfull area and dividing by
Cross-section X-10 (Riffle)
Cross-section X-5 (Riffle)
Reach 3
Cross-section X-4 (Riffle)
Cross-section X-8 (Riffle) Cross-section X-9 (Pool)
Cross-section X-6 (Pool)
Reach 4
Cross-section X-1 (Riffle)
Cross-section X-7 (Riffle)
Cross-section X-2 (Pool) Cross-section X-3 (Riffle)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Table 11a. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Table 11a continued. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Stream Reach
Dimension and substrate Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY7
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
BF Width (ft)7.7 6.7 6.4 6.9 - 6.1 5.0 19.6 18.7 17.3 17.6 - 12.0 11.3 13.80 14.7 13.1 12.2 - 11.0 11.6 29.4 24.3 22.8 22.4 -12.4 12.9
BF Mean Depth (ft)0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 - 0.5 0.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 1.0 - 1.5 1.6 0.90 0.9 0.9 1.0 - 1.0 0.9 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.7 -1.0 0.7
Width/Depth Ratio 11.7 11 12.1 14.1 - 11.5
10.8 16.4 20.6 29 16.9 - 8.0
7.0 15.2 17.3 14 12.5 - 11.3
13.6 26.1 28.3 31.8 30.8 -12.6 17.7
BF Cross-sectional Area (ft²)5.1 4.1 3.4 3.4 - 3.2 2.3 23.5 17.1 10.3 18.3 - 17.9 18.2 12.5 12.5 12.3 11.8 - 10.7 9.9 33.2 20.8 16.3 16.3 -12.1 9.4
BF Max Depth (ft)1.2 1.1 0.8 0.8 -1.0 0.9 2.8 1.7 2.0 3.0 - 2.8 2.7 1.70 1.6 0.9 1.8 - 1.7 1.7 2.80 2.5 1.8 1.5 -1.6 1.5
Width of Floodprone Area (ft) 39.9 49.4
34.7 33.4 - 33.4 32.2 -------100.0 73.1
73.2 73.1 - 73.1 73.2 100.0 93.8
92.5 87.5 -87.5 87.7
Entrenchment Ratio (MY1 will provide standard)*5.2 5.4 5.4 4.9 - 5.5 6.4-------5.3 5.0 5.6 6.0 - 6.6 6.3-------
Bank Height Ratio (MY1 will provide standard)*1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 - 0.9 1.1-------1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1.0 1.0-------
Wetted Perimeter (ft)8.5 7.18 6.7 7.2 - 6.4 5.4 21.0 19.4 18.1 20.2 - 14.3 13.9 14.4 15.4 13.9 13.0 - 11.8 12.3 30.5 25.7 23.7 23.0 -13.3 13.8
Hydraulic Radius (ft)0.6 0.57 0.5 0.5 - 0.5 0.4 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.9 - 1.3 1.3 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 - 0.9 0.8 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.7 - 0.9 0.7
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft 2)- - - ---- - - - -
--- - - - -
--- - - - -
---
d50 (mm)----------------------------
Stream Reach
Dimension and substrate Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY7 Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY7
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
BF Width (ft) 12.6 11.9 19.7 11.6 - 11.1 12.5 12.60 12.2 12.1 12.6 - 12.0 11.9
BF Mean Depth (ft) 1.1 1.09 0.7 1.0 - 0.9 0.9 1.20 1.2 1.1 1.0 - 1.0 0.9
Width/Depth Ratio 12.0 10.9 26.6 11.3 - 12.7 14.4 10.9 10.3 10.6 13.0 - 11.7 13.5
BF Cross-sectional Area (ft²) 13.2 13 14.6 12.0 - 9.8 10.9 14.5 14.6 13.9 12.2 - 12.2 10.4
BF Max Depth (ft) 1.70 1.8 1.8 1.7 - 1.7 1.8 1.70 2 2.1 1.7 - 2.0 1.4
Width of Floodprone Area (ft) 100.0 71.4 71.3 71.3 - 71.3 71.4 100.0 68.6 68.5 68.5 - 68.5 68.5
Entrenchment Ratio (MY1 will provide standard)* 5.7 6 3.6 6.1 - 6.4 5.7 5.4 5.6 5.7 5.5 - 5.7 5.8
Bank Height Ratio (MY1 will provide standard)* 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 - 1.0 1.0
Wetted Perimeter (ft) 13.5 13.0 20.4 12.4 - 12.0 13.4 13.3 13.1 13.2 13.7 - 12.8 12.4
Hydraulic Radius (ft) 1.0 1.0 0.9 1 - 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.9 - 1.0 0.8
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft 2)- - - ----- - - ----
d50 (mm)--------------
Reach 1
Cross-section X-12 (Riffle)
Per DMS/IRT request, bank height ratio is calculated by setting the current bankfull area to match the asbuilt bankfull area and dividing by
Reach T1
Cross-section X-16 (Riffle) Cross-section X-17 (Riffle)
Cross-section X-13 (Pool)
Reach 1
Cross-section X-14 (Riffle)Cross-section X-15 (Pool)
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Reach 4
Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD
4 n Min Mean Med Max SD
4 n Min Mean Med Max SD
4 n Min Mean Med Max SD
4 n Min Mean Med Max SD
4 n Min Mean Med Max SD
4 n
Bankfull Width (ft)7.2 9.3 9.1 11.8 1.7 4 8.1 10.2 10.0 12.5 1.7 4 7 9.5 9.7 11.6 1.8 4 7 10.33 9.9 14.5 2.8 4 6.30 8.80 9.25 10.40 1.54 4 7 9.275 8.75 12.6 2.051 4
Floodprone Width (ft)31.3 57.9 66.0 68.1 15.4 4 58.8 66.6 67.7 72.0 4.9 4 46.3 61.93 66.55 68.3 9.1 4 45.7 61.43 65.85 68.3 9.1 4 45.70 61.43 65.85 68.30 9.14 4 45.8 61.75 66.55 68.1 9.26 4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.5 0.8 0.9 1.1 0.2 4 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.1 4 0.4 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.1 4 0.4 0.525 0.55 0.6 0.1 4 0.40 0.63 0.65 0.80 0.15 4 0.4 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.122 4
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.8 1.4 1.5 1.7 0.3 4 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.2 0.1 4 0.7 0.975 1.05 1.1 0.2 4 0.6 0.925 0.95 1.2 0.2 4 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.30 0.21 4 0.7 1.025 1.1 1.2 0.192 4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)3.3 7.7 7.4 12.7 3.4 4 3.4 6.4 7.0 8.2 1.8 4 3 5.75 6.25 7.5 1.7 4 2.5 5.40 5.65 7.8 1.9 4 2.40 5.58 6.05 7.80 2.02 4 2.4 5.525 5.75 8.2 2.07 4
Width/Depth Ratio 11.0 12.3 11.3 15.4 1.8 4 12.6 17.0 17.0 21.5 3.6 4 13.6 15.98 16.3 17.7 1.5 4 15.3 20.25 19.4 26.9 4.2 4 13.60 14.60 14.25 16.30 1.07 4 13.3 16.35 16.35 19.4 3 4
Entrenchment Ratio (MY1 will provide standard)*4.4 6.2 6.4 7.6 1.2 4 5.3 6.2 6.1 7.4 0.8 4 5.9 6.6 6.4 7.7 0.7 4 4.7 6.175 6.25 7.5 1.0 4 6.60 7.05 7.10 7.40 0.32 4 5.4 6.8 6.95 7.9 0.93 4
Bank Height Ratio (MY1 will provide standard)*1111041111041111040.90.90.90.9040.90 0.98 0.95 1.10 0.08 4 0.9 0.95 0.95 1 0.05 4
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
3d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 /
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 11b. Stream Reach Morphology Summary
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Per DMS/IRT request, bank height ratio is calculated by setting the current bankfull area to match the asbuilt bankfull area and dividing by
the current max depth.
Baseline (Poor survey quality) MY-1 (Utilize for comparison)MY-2 MY- 3 MY- 5 MY- 7
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Reach 3
Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD
4 n Min Mean Med Max SD
4 n Min Mean Med Max SD
4 n Min Mean Med Max SD
4 n Min Mean Med Max SD
4 n Min Mean Med Max SD
4 n
Bankfull Width (ft)9.3 10.7 10.9 11.6 0.9 4 10.1 11.2 11.5 11.7 0.7 4 9.7 10.0 9.9 10.5 0.3 4.0 9.3 9.7 9.6 10.3 0.4 4.0 8.9 10.4 9.5 13.9 2.0 4.0 9.3 10.8 10.7 12.6 1.4 4.0
Floodprone Width (ft)51.6 73.4 76.1 89.9 15.7 4 67.5 83.5 88.4 89.9 9.3 4 50.9 73.6 76.8 89.9 16.3 4.0 52.3 73.8 76.4 89.9 15.5 4.0 52.3 73.8 76.4 89.9 15.5 4.0 57.8 75.7 77.5 89.9 14.3 4.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.6 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.2 4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.1 4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.1 4.0 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.1 4.0 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.1 4.0 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.1 4.0
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 0.1 4 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 0.1 4 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.2 0.1 4.0 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.2 0.2 4.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 0.0 4.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 0.1 4.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)6.8 7.9 7.6 9.8 1.2 4 6.2 7.1 7.0 8.0 0.6 4 4.5 5.4 5.4 6.4 0.8 4.0 4.8 6.0 6.3 6.7 0.8 4.0 4.8 6.0 6.2 6.9 0.9 4.0 4.9 6.2 6.5 7.1 0.8 4.0
Width/Depth Ratio 10.8 15.0 15.1 19.2 3.9 4 14.2 18.0 18.2 21.3 2.6 4 15.1 18.9 19.7 21.0 2.4 4.0 13.5 16.1 16.2 18.3 2.1 4.0 13.1 18.5 16.3 28.3 6.0 4.0 14.0 19.0 19.1 23.7 3.4 4.0
Entrenchment Ratio (MY1 will provide standard)*4.4 6.9 7.5 8.2 1.5 4 4.5 6.6 6.7 8.5 1.6 4 5.1 7.4 7.6 9.3 1.8 4.0 5.1 7.7 8.0 9.7 1.9 4.0 5.9 7.2 6.6 9.6 1.4 4.0 4.9 7.1 7.1 9.4 1.6 4.0
Bank Height Ratio (MY1 will provide standard)*1111041111040.91.01.01.00.04.01.01.01.01.10.04.00.91.01.01.10.14.00.81.01.01.00.14.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
3d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 /
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
MY- 7
Table 11b continued. Stream Reach Morphology Summary
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
MY-2 MY- 3 MY- 5Baseline (Poor survey quality) MY-1 (Utilize for comparison)
Per DMS/IRT request, bank height ratio is calculated by setting the current bankfull area to match the asbuilt bankfull area and dividing by
the current max depth.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Reach 1
Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only Min Mean Med Max SD
4 n Min Mean Med Max SD
4 n Min Mean Med Max SD
4 n Min Mean Med Max SD
4 n Min Mean Med Max SD
4 n Min Mean Med Max SD
4 n
Bankfull Width (ft)12.6 13.0 12.6 13.8 0.6 3 11.9 12.9 12.2 14.7 1.3 3 12.1 15.0 13.1 19.7 3.4 3.0 11.6 12.1 12.2 12.6 0.4 3.0 11.0 11.4 11.1 12.0 0.4 3.0 11.6 12.0 11.9 12.5 0.4 3.0
Floodprone Width (ft)100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 3 68.6 71.0 71.4 73.1 1.9 3 68.5 71.0 71.3 73.2 1.9 3.0 68.5 71.0 71.3 73.1 1.9 3.0 68.5 71.0 71.3 73.1 1.9 3.0 68.5 71.0 71.4 73.2 1.9 3.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.9 1.1 1.1 1.2 0.1 3 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.2 0.1 3 0.7 0.9 0.9 1.1 0.2 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.0 3.0
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 0.0 3 1.6 1.8 1.8 2.0 0.2 3 0.9 1.6 1.8 2.1 0.5 3.0 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 0.0 3.0 1.7 1.8 1.7 2.0 0.1 3.0 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.8 0.2 3.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)12.5 13.4 13.2 14.5 0.8 3 12.5 13.4 13.0 14.6 0.9 3 12.3 13.6 13.9 14.6 1.0 3.0 11.8 12.0 12.0 12.2 0.2 3.0 9.8 10.9 10.7 12.2 1.0 3.0 9.9 10.4 10.4 10.9 0.4 3.0
Width/Depth Ratio 10.9 12.7 12.0 15.2 1.8 3 10.3 12.8 10.9 17.3 3.2 3 10.6 17.1 14.0 26.6 6.9 3.0 11.3 12.3 12.5 13.0 0.7 3.0 11.3 11.9 11.7 12.7 0.6 3.0 13.5 13.8 13.6 14.4 0.4 3.0
Entrenchment Ratio (MY1 will provide standard)*5.3 5.5 5.4 5.7 0.2 3 5.0 5.5 5.6 6.0 0.4 3 3.6 5.0 5.6 5.7 1.0 3.0 5.5 5.9 6.0 6.1 0.3 3.0 5.7 6.2 6.4 6.6 0.4 3.0 5.7 5.9 5.8 6.3 0.3 3.0
Bank Height Ratio (MY1 will provide standard)*1111031111031.01.01.01.00.03.01.01.01.01.00.03.00.91.01.01.00.03.00.91.01.01.00.03.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Max depth (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft/ft)
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
3d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 /
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 11b continued. Stream Reach Morphology Summary
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
MY-2 MY- 3 MY- 5 MY- 7Baseline (Poor survey quality) MY-1 (Utilize for comparison)
Per DMS/IRT request, bank height ratio is calculated by setting the current bankfull area to match the asbuilt bankfull area and dividing b
the current max depth.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

Appendix E

Hydrologic Data

Date of Collection Reach1 Crest Gauge (feet
ABOVE bankfull)
Approximate Date of Occurrence (Source:
on-site rain gauge)
Method of Data
Collection
6/7/2017 0.46 4/25/2017
Crest Gauge
Measurement
10/3/2017 0.22 8/17/2017
Crest Gauge
Measurement
3/22/2018 0.35 2/7/2018
Crest Gauge
Measurement
10/22/2018 0.4 9/16/2018 (Hurricane Florance)
Crest Gauge
Measurement
11/16/2018 0.78 10/26/2018
Crest Gauge
Measurement
3/28/2019 0.74 1/24/2019
Crest Gauge
Measurement
10/17/2019 0.94 6/8/2019
Crest Gauge
Measurement
2/10/2020 0.91 1/24/2020
Crest Gauge
Measurement
11/6/2020 1.49 7/23/2020
Crest Gauge
Measurement
7/1/2021 1.43 6/11/2021
Crest Gauge
Measurement
10/21/2021 1.01 9/22/2021
Crest Gauge
Measurement
3/16/2023 1.00 1/13/2023 Crest Gauge
Measurement
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No ID. 96313
Year 2 Monitoring (2018)
Year 3 Monitoring (2019)
Year 4 Monitoring (2020)
Year 7 Monitoring (2023)
Year 1 Monitoring (2017)
Year 5 Monitoring (2021)
Year 6 Monitoring (2022)
No Crest Gauge Reading
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC.
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Table 15. Wetland Restoration Area Success
Browns Summit Restoration Project: DMS Project ID No. 96313
Year 1
(2017)
Year 2
(2018)
Year 3
(2019)
Year 4
(2020)
Year 5
(2021)
Year 6
(2022)
Year 7
(2023)
Year 1
(2017)
Year 2
(2018)
Year 3
(2019)
Year 4
(2020)
Year 5
(2021)
Year 6
(2022)
Year 7
(2023)
Year 1
(2017)
Year 2
(2018)
Year 3
(2019)
Year 4
(2020)
Year 5
(2021)
Year 6
(2022)
Year 7
(2023)
Year 1
(2017)
Year 2
(2018)
Year 3
(2019)
Year 4
(2020)
Year 5
(2021)
Year 6
(2022)
Year 7
(2023)
BSAW1 44.7 45.1 88.6 97.0 90.3 32.6 22.9 105.5 106.5 209.0 229.0 213.0 77.0 54.0 74.8 80.5 88.6 97.0 90.3 72.0 43.2 176.5 190.0 209.0 229.0 213.0 170.0 102.0
BSAW2 3.2 6.8 7.2 6.8 10.2 9.3 6.4 7.5 16.0 17.0 16.0 24.0 22.0 15.0 13.8 38.8 18.4 42.4 17.8 24.2 19.5 32.5 91.5 43.5 100.0 42.0 57.0 46.0
BSAW3 47.7 48.7 83.1 97.0 90.3 39.4 64.0 112.5 115.0 196.0 229.0 213.0 93.0 151.0 91.7 97.9 87.7 97.0 90.3 89.4 83.5 216.5 231.0 207.0 229.0 213.0 211.0 197.0
BSAW4 97.0 100.0 88.6 97.0 73.3 98.7 85.2 229.0 236.0 209.0 229.0 173.0 233.0 201.0 97.0 100.0 88.6 97.0 89.8 98.7 85.2 229.0 236.0 209.0 229.0 212.0 233.0 201.0
BSAW5 34.1 48.7 88.6 97.0 90.3 98.7 85.2 80.5 115.0 209.0 229.0 213.0 233.0 201.0 73.7 86.0 88.6 97.0 90.3 98.7 85.2 174.0 203.0 209.0 229.0 213.0 233.0 201.0
BSAW6 46.0 48.7 48.7 50.4 90.3 34.3 51.7 108.5 115.0 115.0 119.0 213.0 81.0 122.0 89.4 91.9 71.6 94.9 90.3 86.9 78.4 211.0 217.0 169.0 224.0 213.0 205.0 185.0
BSAW7 51.1 48.7 88.6 97.0 90.3 52.1 85.6 120.5 115.0 209.0 229.0 213.0 123.0 202.0 91.1 91.7 88.6 97.0 90.3 97.0 85.6 215.0 216.5 209.0 229.0 213.0 229.0 202.0
BSAW8 97.0 90.3 98.7 85.6 229.0 213.0 233.0 202.0 97.0 90.3 98.7 85.6 229.0 213.0 233.0 202.0
BSAW9*19.1 45.0 32.2 76.0
Type 4 (1:1 Ratio - Success Criteria 12% of Growing Season)
Type 2 (1.5:1 Ratio - Success Criteria 12% of Growing Season)
Type 5 (3.5:1 Ratio - Success Criteria 9% of Growing Season)
Well ID
Percentage of Consecutive Days <12 inches from Ground Surface¹Percentage of Cumulative Days <12 inches from Ground Surface¹Cumulative Days Meeting Criteria³Most Consecutive Days Meeting Criteria²
Type 3 (1.5:1 Ratio - Success Criteria 12% of Growing Season)
According to the Baseline Monitoring Report, the growing season for Guilford County is from March 22 to November 13
and is 229 days long. 12% of the growing season is 28 days and 9% of the growing season is 21 days.
Notes:
¹Indicates the percentage of most consecutive or cumulative number of days within the monitored growing season with a water 12 inches or less from the soil surface.
³Indicates the cumulative number of days within the monitored growing season with a water table 12 inches or less from the soil surface.
* BSAW9 was installed on 3/16/2023 (see the CCPV in Appendix B for the location of the well).
²Indicates the most consecutive number of days within the monitored growing season with a water table 12 inches or less from the soil surface.
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC. 
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 7. Wetland Restoration Graphs (2023)
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
1/1/2023 1/31/2023 3/2/2023 4/1/2023 5/1/2023 5/31/2023 6/30/2023 7/30/2023 8/29/2023 9/28/2023 10/28/2023 11/27/2023 12/27/2023
De
p
t
h

t
o

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

(
i
n
)
Date
Browns Summit Wetland Restoration Wells
(BSAW1 - BSAW9)
Ground Surface
-12 inches
BSAW1
BSAW2
BSAW3
BSAW4
BSAW5
BSAW6
BSAW7
BSAW8
BSAW9
Begin Growing
Season
End Growing
Season
Rain data from onsite rain gauge at the Browns Summit site
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
1/1/2023 2/15/2023 4/1/2023 5/16/2023 6/30/2023 8/14/2023 9/28/2023 11/12/2023 12/27/2023
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
.
)
Daily Rain
Rain data NC Cronos MPE
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC. 
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 7. Wetland Restoration Graphs (2023)
-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
1/1/2023 2/15/2023 4/1/2023 5/16/2023 6/30/2023 8/14/2023 9/28/2023 11/12/2023 12/27/2023
De
p
t
h

t
o

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

(
i
n
)
Date
Browns Summit Wetland Restoration Well
(BSAW1)
Ground
Surface
-12 inches
BSAW1
Begin
Growing
Season
End
Growing
Season
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
1/1/2021 2/15/2021 4/1/2021 5/16/2021 6/30/2021 8/14/2021 9/28/2021 11/12/2021 12/27/2021
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
)
Rain
YR7 MOST CONSECUTIVE DAYS 
CRITERIA MET ‐54 (22.9%) 
3/22/2023 ‐5/6/2023
GROWING SEASON 
(3/22 ‐11/13)
Rain data from onsite rain gauge at the Browns Summit site
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
1/1/2023 2/15/2023 4/1/2023 5/16/2023 6/30/2023 8/14/2023 9/28/2023 11/12/2023 12/27/2023
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
.
)
Daily Rain
Rain data NC Cronos MPE
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC. 
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 7. Wetland Restoration Graphs (2023)
-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
1/1/2023 2/15/2023 4/1/2023 5/16/2023 6/30/2023 8/14/2023 9/28/2023 11/12/2023 12/27/2023
De
p
t
h

t
o

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

(
i
n
)
Date
Browns Summit Wetland Restoration Well
(BSAW2)
Ground
Surface
-12 inches
BSAW2
Begin
Growing
Season
End
Growing
Season
YR7 MOST CONSECUTIVE DAYS 
CRITERIA ‐15 (6.4%) 4/2/2023 ‐
4/16/2023
GROWING SEASON 
(3/22 ‐11/13)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
1/1/2023 2/15/2023 4/1/2023 5/16/2023 6/30/2023 8/14/2023 9/28/2023 11/12/2023 12/27/2023
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
.
)
Daily Rain
Rain data NC Cronos MPE
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC. 
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 7. Wetland Restoration Graphs (2023)
GROWING SEASON 
(3/18 ‐11/16)
-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
1/1/2023 2/15/2023 4/1/2023 5/16/2023 6/30/2023 8/14/2023 9/28/2023 11/12/2023 12/27/2023
De
p
t
h

t
o

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

(
i
n
)
Date
Browns Summit Wetland Restoration Well
(BSAW3)
Ground
Surface
-12 inches
BSAW3
Begin
Growing
Season
End
Growing
Season
YR7 MOST CONSECUTIVE DAYS 
CRITERIA MET ‐151 (64%) 
3/22/2023 ‐8/20/2023
GROWING SEASON 
(3/22 ‐11/13)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
1/1/2023 2/15/2023 4/1/2023 5/16/2023 6/30/2023 8/14/2023 9/28/2023 11/12/2023 12/27/2023
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
.
)
Daily Rain
Rain data NC Cronos MPE
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC. 
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 7. Wetland Restoration Graphs (2023)
YR4 MOST CONSECUTIVE DAYS 
CRITERIA MET ‐75.8 (31.2%)
9/2/2016 ‐11/16/2016
GROWING SEASON 
(3/18 ‐11/16)
-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
1/1/2023 2/15/2023 4/1/2023 5/16/2023 6/30/2023 8/14/2023 9/28/2023 11/12/2023 12/27/2023
De
p
t
h

t
o

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

(
i
n
)
Date
Browns Summit Wetland Restoration Well
(BSAW4)
Ground
Surface
-12 inches
BSAW4
Begin
Growing
Season
End
Growing
SeasonYR7 MOST CONSECUTIVE DAYS 
CRITERIA MET ‐201 (85.2%) 
3/22/2023 ‐10/9/2023
GROWING SEASON 
(3/22 ‐11/13)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
1/1/2023 2/15/2023 4/1/2023 5/16/2023 6/30/2023 8/14/2023 9/28/2023 11/12/2023 12/27/2023
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
.
)
Daily Rain
Rain data NC Cronos MPE
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC. 
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 7. Wetland Restoration Graphs (2023)
-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
1/1/2023 2/15/2023 4/1/2023 5/16/2023 6/30/2023 8/14/2023 9/28/2023 11/12/2023 12/27/2023
De
p
t
h

t
o

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

(
i
n
)
Date
Browns Summit Wetland Restoration Well
(BSAW5)
Ground
Surface
-12 inches
BSAW5
Begin
Growing
Season
End
Growing
Season
YR7 MOST CONSECUTIVE DAYS 
CRITERIA MET ‐201 (85.2%) 
3/22/2023 ‐10/9/2023
GROWING SEASON 
(3/22 ‐11/13)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
1/1/2023 2/15/2023 4/1/2023 5/16/2023 6/30/2023 8/14/2023 9/28/2023 11/12/2023 12/27/2023
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
.
)
Daily Rain
Rain data NC Cronos MPE
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC. 
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 7. Wetland Restoration Graphs (2023)
-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
1/1/2023 2/15/2023 4/1/2023 5/16/2023 6/30/2023 8/14/2023 9/28/2023 11/12/2023 12/27/2023
De
p
t
h

t
o

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

(
i
n
)
Date
Browns Summit Wetland Restoration Well
(BSAW6)
Ground
Surface
-12 inches
BSAW6
Begin
Growing
Season
End
Growing
Season
YR7 MOST CONSECUTIVE DAYS 
CRITERIA MET ‐122 (51.7%) 
3/22/2023 ‐7/21/2023
GROWING SEASON 
(3/22 ‐11/13)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
1/1/2023 2/15/2023 4/1/2023 5/16/2023 6/30/2023 8/14/2023 9/28/2023 11/12/2023 12/27/2023
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
.
)
Daily Rain
Rain data NC Cronos MPE
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC. 
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 7. Wetland Restoration Graphs (2023)
-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
1/1/2023 2/15/2023 4/1/2023 5/16/2023 6/30/2023 8/14/2023 9/28/2023 11/12/2023 12/27/2023
De
p
t
h

t
o

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

(
i
n
)
Date
Browns Summit Wetland Restoration Well
(BSAW7)
Ground
Surface
-12 inches
BSAW7
Begin
Growing
Season
End
Growing
Season
YR7 MOST CONSECUTIVE DAYS 
CRITERIA MET ‐202 (85.6%) 
3/22/2023 ‐10/10/2023
GROWING SEASON 
(3/22 ‐11/13)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
1/1/2023 2/15/2023 4/1/2023 5/16/2023 6/30/2023 8/14/2023 9/28/2023 11/12/2023 12/27/2023
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
.
)
Daily Rain
Rain data NC Cronos MPE
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC. 
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 7. Wetland Restoration Graphs (2023)
-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
1/1/2023 2/15/2023 4/1/2023 5/16/2023 6/30/2023 8/14/2023 9/28/2023 11/12/2023 12/27/2023
De
p
t
h

t
o

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

(
i
n
)
Date
Browns Summit Wetland Restoration Well
(BSAW8)
Ground
Surface
-12 inches
BSAW8
Begin
Growing
Season
End
Growing
Season
YR7 MOST CONSECUTIVE DAYS 
CRITERIA MET ‐202 (85.6%) 
3/22/2023 ‐10/10/2023
GROWING SEASON 
(3/22 ‐11/13)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
1/1/2023 2/15/2023 4/1/2023 5/16/2023 6/30/2023 8/14/2023 9/28/2023 11/12/2023 12/27/2023
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
.
)
Daily Rain
Rain data NC Cronos MPE
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC. 
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
Figure 7. Wetland Restoration Graphs (2023)
-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
1/1/2023 2/15/2023 4/1/2023 5/16/2023 6/30/2023 8/14/2023 9/28/2023 11/12/2023 12/27/2023
De
p
t
h

t
o

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

(
i
n
)
Date
Browns Summit Wetland Restoration Well
(BSAW9)
Ground
Surface
-12 inches
BSAW9
Begin
Growing
Season
End
Growing
Season
YR7 MOST CONSECUTIVE DAYS 
CRITERIA MET ‐45 (19.1%) 
3/22/2023 ‐5/6/2023
GROWING SEASON 
(3/22 ‐11/13)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
1/1/2023 2/15/2023 4/1/2023 5/16/2023 6/30/2023 8/14/2023 9/28/2023 11/12/2023 12/27/2023
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
.
)
Daily Rain
Rain data NC Cronos MPE
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC. 
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. ID 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
c
h
e
s
)
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project MY7
Observed Rainfall versus Historic Averages
Guiford County Historic Average (45.84)Historic 30% Precentile (28.59)
Historic 70% Precentile (55.21)Observed Project Rainfall (37.70)
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project – Hydrology Monitoring Stations Photos
Photos taken on (10/10/2023) unless noted different

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

Manual Crest Gauge – Reading 3/16/23 (1.00’) Manual Crest Gauge

Wetland Well 1 – Reach 4, Station 25+00 Wetland Well 2 – Reach 2, Station 47+00

Wetland Well 3 – Reach 1, Station 52+00 Wetland Well 4 – Reach 1, Station 55+00
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project – Hydrology Monitoring Stations Photos
Photos taken on (10/10/2023) unless noted different

MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC
BROWNS SUMMIT CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT (DMS PROJECT NO. 96313)
MONITORING YEAR 7 OF 7

Wetland Well 5 – Reach 1, Station 58+00 Wetland Well 6 – Reach 1, Station 61+00

Wetland Well 7 – Reach 1, Station 63+50 Wetland Well 8 – Reach 4, Station 23+00

Wetland Well 9 – Reach 4, Station 27+50

Appendix F

Adjusted Wetland Boundary Report

WETLAND BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT M EMORANDUM
This memorandum as suggested by the interagency Review Team (IRT) serves as a wetland boundary adjustment to
restored wetlands proposed in the original Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project. The Browns Summit Creek
Restoration Project Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan, prepared by Michael Baker Engineering in January of 2016,
originally proposed to restore 3,3846 linear feet (LF) of jurisdictional stream, enhance 2,535 LF of stream and restore a
total of 4.44 acres of wetland within the Haw River Headwaters Targeted Loacal Watershed (TLW) 03030002-010020. The
location of the project is shown on the Project Vicinity Map (Figure 1). Credit Ratios for the original proposed features are
included in the attached Restoration Summary Map (Figure 2).
Background
During the development and continued monitoring of the Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project, Eight (8)
groundwater monitoring wells total have been installed within the proposed wetland mitigation areas. BSAW8 was
installed during MY4 to gather additional data in adjacent wetlands. BSAW8 , shown on the Wetland Areas Map (Figure 3)
is located adjacent to wetland type 5 (Hydrologic reestablishment) where BSAW1 is located. BSAW8 data shows the
wetland preforming well above success criteria. Seven of the eight are preforming successfully. One well, BSAW2
historically has not met criteria; therefore, Michael Baker plans to adjust the boundary of the proposed wetland
restoration around this well and extend wetland boundaries in other areas where restoration has occurred within the
conservation easement at a lower credit ratio to equal the contracted WMUs and avoid a loss of credits (Table 1).
Field Investigations
Field investigations were
conducted in November of 2022
to verify the presence of
indicators of wetland soil,
wetland hydrology and
hydrophytic vegetation in the
proposed added wetland
restoration areas. Soil bores
were performed to confirm the
locations and presence of
hydric, marginal and upland
soils on the landscape. The
presence of hydric soils,
combined with hydrology and
vegetation and GIS analysis
aided in the determination of
the adjusted restored wetland boundary within the conservation easement.
TABLE 1. Adjusted Wetland Areas Area Ratio Credits
Original Wetlands (Riparian, Restoration)
R (1 – functioning wetlands) 1.53 3:1 0.51

0.51
R (2- degraded wetlands) 0.43 1.5:1 0.29
R (3 - partially functioning wetlands) 1.76 1.5:1 1.17
R (4 – filled wetlands) 0.45 1:1 0.45
R (5 – hydric soils) 0.27 3.5:1 0.08
Original Proposed Totals 4.44 2.50
Adjusted Wetlands (Riparian, Restoration)
R (1 – functioning wetlands) 1.53 3:1 0.51
R (2- degraded wetlands) 0.43 1.5:1 0.29
R (3 - partially functioning wetlands) 2.55 1.5:1 1.70
R (4 – filled wetlands) 0 1:1 0.00
R (5 – hydric soils) 0.27 3.5:1 0.08
Adjusted Totals 4.78 2.58
Riparian Wetland Credit Difference +0.08
Browns Summit Creek Restoration Project
Wetland Boundary Adjustment Memorandum
SAW-2014-01642 DWR 3885 November 29, 2022
Adjusted Wetland Restoration Areas
As noted above, an area of filled wetlands around monitoring well BSAW2 has not met ground water hydrology
establishment criteria. As such, area around this well that was previously proposed as a restoration wetland (type 4 –
filled wetland) has been removed as credit toward Riparian wetland mitigation units (1:1 ratio). Alternatively, areas
identified during field investigations on November 10, 2022 were determined to qualify as having at least partially
functioning restored wetlands (restoration type R-3; credit 1.5:1). Soils within these wetland restoration areas were
hydric and the areas expressed wetland hyrology indicators such as surface water, saturation, iron deposits, water-
stained leaves, hydrogen sulficde odor and oxidized rhizospheres along living roots. Additionally, likely-hydophytic
vegetation was also noted including sedges (Carex lurida), black willow (Salix nigra), green bulrush (Scirpus atrovirens),
American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), and Smooth alder (Alnus serrulata). These areas identified on the November
10, 2022 field visit were deemd to qualify for a wetland restoration ratio of 1.5:1 toward WMUs. Table 1 summarizes the
net gain of 0.08 WMUs after Wetland Boundary Readjustment.

It should be noted that these adjusted wetland areas are located within the existing Conservation Easement and had not
previously been included as wetland areas in any existing jurisdictional determinations, nor had they been proposed as
wetland restoration areas with the original project proposal. These areas are also fenced off from cattle in the vicinity.

Best Regards

Terry Burhans, PWS, CPSS

Inclusions
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map ............................................................................................................................................ 3
Figure 2 Restoration Summary Map ................................................................................................................................. 4
Figure 3 Wetland Areas Map ............................................................................................................................................ 5
Figure 4 Adjusted Wetland Restoration Areas Map ......................................................................................................... 7
Site Photographs ................................................................................................................................................. 9
Soil Description Form ........................................................................................................................................ 14

Site Location
Fairg
r
o
v
e

C
h
u
r
c
h

R
d
Sp
e
a
r
m
a
n

R
d
NC Highway 150Mi
d
d
l
e
l
a
n
d

D
r
Y
a
n
c
e
y
v
i
l
l
e

R
d
G U I L F O R D
G U I L F O R D
R O C K I N G H A M
R O C K I N G H A M
Greensboro
Greensboro
£¤158
Guilford County
^_
£¤158
Site Location
§¨¦85
£¤29
150
Greensboro E
Figure 1
Project Vicinity Map
Browns Summit (DMS# 96313)
Note: Site is located within targeted local
watershed 0303002010020.
Conservation Easement
NCDMS TLW
NCDEQ - Division
of Mitigation Services
0.5 0 0.5
Miles
To access the site from Raleigh, take Interstate 40 and head west on I-40 towards Greensboro, for approximately 68 miles. Take the exit
ramp to E. Lee St. (exit 224) towards Greensboro and continue for 2 miles before turning onto U.S. Highway 29 North. Once on U.S.
Highway 29 North, travel north for approximately 10 miles before exiting and turning on to NC-150 West. Continue west on NC-150 for 5
miles. The project site is located along and between NC-150 and Spearman Rd., with access points through residences on Middleland Dr.
and Broad Ridge Ct. The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the site may require
traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and therefore access by the general public is not permitted. Access by authorized
personnel of state and federal agencies or their designees/contractors involved in the development, oversight and stewardship of the
restoration site is permitted within the terms and timeframes of their defined roles. Any intended site visitation or activity by any person
outside of these previously sanctioned roles and activities requires prior coordination with DMS.
Figure 2Restoration Summary MapBrowns Summit Site(DMS #96313)
Reach R1
Reach T1
Reach R2 (lower)
Reach R3 (lower)
Reach R3 (upper)
Reach T3
Reach R4
Reach R6
Reach R5
Reach T4
Reach T2Reach R2 (upper)
NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC
911 Board
E
0 500 1,000250
Feet
Conservation Easement
Restoration Feature Approach
Restoration, 1:1
Enhancement I, 1.5:1
Enhancement II, 2.5:1
BMP, 1.5:1
Wetland Mitigation Types
1 - "Functioning", 3:1 credit ratio
2 - Degraded, 1.5:1 credit ratio
3 - Partially Functioning, 1.5:1 credit ratio
4 - Filled, 1:1 credit ratio
5 - Hydrologic Reestablishment, 3.5:1 ratio
#0
#0BSAW8
BSAW1
XS-9
XS-6
XS-8
XS-11
X
S
-
3
XS
-
2
XS
-
1
XS-
1
0 ±
Figure 3A.Browns Summit CreekRestoration SiteWetland Areas (Upper)
0 250 500125
Feet
Legend
#0 Groundwater Monitoring Wells
Conservation Easement
Cross Sections
Stream Centerline
Top of Bank
Wetland Restoration Areas
Existing Jurisdictional Wetlands
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0
#0BSAW7
BSAW6
BSAW5
BSAW4
BSAW3
BSAW2
XS-11
XS-16
XS-17
X
S
-
1
2
±
Figure 3B.Browns Summit CreekRestoration SiteWetland Areas (Lower)
0 250 500125
Feet
Legend
#0 Groundwater Monitoring Wells
Conservation Easement
Cross Sections
Stream Centerline
Top of Bank
Wetland Restoration Areas
Existing Jurisdictional Wetlands
#0
#0
k
k
k
BSAW8
BSAW1
XS-6
X
S
-
7
XS-4
XS-5
X
S
-
3
XS
-
1
F
Figure 4A.Browns Summit CreekRestoration SiteAdjusted Wetland Restoration Areas
0 100 20050
Feet
Legend
#0 Groundwater Monitoring Wells
Conservation Easement
Cross Sections
Stream Centerline
Top of Bank
Existing Jurisdictional Wetlands
Wetland Restoration Areas
Additional Wetland Restoration Areas
Soil Borings
Hydric
Marginal
Upland
k Representative Hydric
Topo Major
Topo Minor
Wetland Restoration Area Added(0.372 acres)
Wetland Restoration Area Added(0.414 acres)
1
2
3
#0BSAW2
X
S
-
1
2 ±
Figure 4B.Browns Summit CreekRestoration SiteAdjusted Wetland Restoration Areas
0 100 20050
Feet
Legend
#0 Groundwater Monitoring Wells
Conservation Easement
Cross Sections
Stream Centerline
Top of Bank
Wetland Restoration Areas Removed
Wetland Restoration Areas
Existing Jurisdictional Wetlands
Additional Wetland Restoration Areas
Topo Major
Topo Minor
Wetland Restoration Area Removed(0.450 acres)
Brown Summit Creek Restoration Project
NCDMS Project ID No. 96313, NCDEQ Contract No. 5792 USACE Action ID: SAW-2014-01642
NCDWR No. 14-0332 Cape Fear River Basin: 03030002-010020
Photo 1. A view North along added wetland restoration area.
Photo 2. Hydric Soil present throughout added wetland restoration area.
Brown Summit Creek Restoration Project
NCDMS Project ID No. 96313, NCDEQ Contract No. 5792 USACE Action ID: SAW-2014-01642
NCDWR No. 14-0332 Cape Fear River Basin: 03030002-010020
Photo 3. Hydric Soil present throughout added wetland restoration area.
Photo 4. Hydric Soil present throughout added wetland restoration area.
Brown Summit Creek Restoration Project
NCDMS Project ID No. 96313, NCDEQ Contract No. 5792 USACE Action ID: SAW-2014-01642
NCDWR No. 14-0332 Cape Fear River Basin: 03030002-010020
Photo 5. Hydric Soil present throughout added wetland restoration area.
Photo 6. Hydric Soil present throughout added wetland restoration area.
Brown Summit Creek Restoration Project
NCDMS Project ID No. 96313, NCDEQ Contract No. 5792 USACE Action ID: SAW-2014-01642
NCDWR No. 14-0332 Cape Fear River Basin: 03030002-010020
Photo 7. Hydric Soil present throughout added wetland restoration area.
Photo 8. Hydric Soil present throughout added wetland restoration area.
Brown Summit Creek Restoration Project
NCDMS Project ID No. 96313, NCDEQ Contract No. 5792 USACE Action ID: SAW-2014-01642
NCDWR No. 14-0332 Cape Fear River Basin: 03030002-010020
Photo 9. Hydric Soil present throughout added wetland restoration area.
Photo 10. Hydric Soil present throughout added wetland restoration area.
Soil Description Form

Project: Browns Summit Restoration Project
County: Guilford County, NC
Date: November 10, 2022
Staff: Terry Burhans PWS, CPSS, Drew Powers
Boring Horizon Depth Texture Matrix Color
Mottle Colors
(Abundance / Size /
Contrast)
Notes
1 O 0-4 Loam 10YR 3/1 Water table
A 4-7 Silt loam 10YR 5/1 7.5YR 5/4 at 4” below
B 9-15+ Clay loam 10YR 5/1 7.5YR 5/4 Surface.
7.5YR 5/6

2 O 0-2 Loam 7.5YR 3/1
A 2-7 Silt loam 10YR 4/2 10YR 5/4
B 7-15+ Silt loam 10YR 5/1 10YR 4/4
2.5Y 5/2

3 O 0-1 Loam 10YR 3/1
A 1-12 Silt Loam 10YR 8/1 5YR 6/8
10YR 6/2
B 12-15+ Silt Loam 10YR 7/1
7.5YR 5/8