20240102 Ver 1_elyse meadows permit attachments_20240115

Site Plans

c/§
°
�
R ; |)•
2
2 S
U v ; ;,|
O
m _
2 \!|
m
2
0
o
B
LU
cn 2
a \;-
_
-
^
|
;
w cn
w 0
- Ems=
°
}
�
:y
x
/®
\
§�\�
�/}\�
A
i1-
— a
\
)]
_
�§
0
§ e
_z.
>

NN2 flgflg
C�'a N a o N
QGg O> _a LU _
Nat z♦W� C Q a � w - R w w w
v/ cc Z Z _
o w Q m LV W
LCU _
W C cn O N H d acid z o U ¢ o a
o
\o
U � �
ro F o
ro OO
ov Olu N m o
ci U
w0 H ou y,
w 0 w o
w w � �I P O f
a w a �Zz v
a- u °u� u -
�N 21712a 2Nkw
wOw U !�
W Z w� O^1NZin W Z°J ~QOQ /
�3 �wwa \� w
aN a a� J \
of
O
3 o a w a fn LLo Qa �. 10
P �� \1�`•Vv.\\ „� _ g
aZU
�Lil
Lu
o
�-
c�
w
o
s
a w
m
O
U O
j Z

(3)y2�
�Yg
r
�Hg
Wp> H
JWLU
o
N
W C cn
w a O m
2
0
a
z
w H
o z �
U Q Q
3 o a w
a F p a
Q Z U o
W 0
O �
Z
z
M
o
w
w w
y w
w
o
Z ~
W U
2
O
rc
w
2 O
o
N

�y2 1
N
NQ
J
O
�Hg
Wp> H
NCG U
Jcc
W
zz
z
M
o
-
N
LU
_
0
W C V/
cc
W a 2 m
U d U a
2
o�
B-,
CIL
M
I
o
N
\ ,
El
vo
n7
O
N
0
U
a
2
O Z �
a
a p o
o m
w
} 3 o a w
z a
a F p a
Q Z U
3 o a U
m
3 z
w O U
O �
N w
Z
z
3 > a
0
N
O
O
O
0£'LOZ
O
+
Z 90E
O
® a
U
w K
®
o D
U
om00
0
o
CV
0
�2 O
N N
uO
O
N w
N
Na
�
} w
mp
J
oa
rl
�
a a
aw
ro
m�
Imo
m moo
J3
a
An70
30
J N N
O —
mprn
Q O
VI
N U
3 Q
r
apt
¢>
<
QUo
3
w ��
Wx
,x
Na3
N
coo
z z_za
tea}
zoz
I
a wZa
U O
xMx
awa
0 =<0
o lox

NN2�
Uyv
A o g
y
U) N LU
W � a:_j
Cl) U
Q o0 Qa
J W
W (n
Q J
_
Zz
a�CVm
�aa 2�a
o
o
-
¢�
o
o
-o=
-
n
0
a
z
o z �
w H U Q Q
m U
3 o a w a F a
}o
L
3 o a o 3 z
N w
U > l o W
z
i�3>a
Lo
L ^ J
U
N
LO
0
ro
r
0 00
�C)
N Qo
a
a
mw
U
a 3�
z a�3
FQO
~ 3 C)
coo
w o ?aa
z a NOQ
a wz3
Q U 00
a =moo
a r.W

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
MARC RECKTENWALD
Director
Andrew Ross
Triangle Land Partners, LLC
PO Box 5548
Cary, NC 27512
Project: Elyse Meadows
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
January 12, 2024
Expiration of Acceptance: 7/12/2024
County: Harnett
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the applicable 404 Permit/401 Certification/Buffer Approval within this time frame,
this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once
DMS receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit
and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid
by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8-di it HUC
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Cape Fear
03030004
Riparian Wetland
0.22
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Kelly B. Williams
In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator
cc: Rhiannon Graham, agent
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
h(h�TH :.AROI iRA IV
o �nmmmenni w�a 919,707,8976

PJ D

,d ierracon
November 2, 2023
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Truelove Enterprises Property
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
Harnett County, North Carolina
Terracon Project No. 70237261
Please reference the attached Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) request package
for the Truelove Enterprises Property. The site is located off McDougald road in Harnett County,
North Carolina. The site consists of approximately 121 acres of agricultural fields and
undeveloped forested land.
Terracon personnel conducted a wetland/stream delineation of the site in May 2023. Terracon
did identify potential wetlands, tributaries, and surface water ponds on the site. Reference
attached data forms and exhibits for documentation.
Terracon looks forward to working with you on this project. If you have any questions regarding
the content of this PJD submittal, please contact me at [phone] or via email at
rhiannon.graham(a�terracon.com.
Sincerely,
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Rhiannon Graham
Field Scientist, Natural Resources
Jeff Harbour, SPWS
Senior Scientist, Natural Resources
Attachments: JD Request Form, PJD Form, Exhibits, Data Forms, Photos
4%, Terracon Consultants Inc. 2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107, Raleigh, NC 28208-3608

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aimy.mil/Missions/Re ul�atoiyPermitProi4ram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 11 Spence Way Lane
City, State: Lillington, NC 27546
County: Harnett
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0539-98-0036.000
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Rhiannon Graham
Mailing Address: 2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107
Raleigh, NC 27604
Telephone Number: 919-457-1110
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultanti
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Gene Truelove
Mailing Address: P.O. BOX 1475
Fuquay Varina, NC 27546
Telephone Number: 919-795-3053
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Rhiannon Graham
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner Z Authorized Agent'
11 /2/23
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
s For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
7 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminM JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 121.44 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
zProject Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude:
35.39167
-78.86407
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 1 Ix 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hM2://www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Missions/Regulatoly-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'.
Vicinity Map
0 Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
0 Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑✓ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
ILJ Other Assessment Forms
*APT has been offline and unavailable for us to use; therefore apt is not provided with this submittal
' www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/readocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App A Prelim _JD_Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see hM2://www.saw.usace.4M.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Rhlannon Graham-Terracon
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Harnett City: Lillington
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.39167 Long.:-78.86407
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17S 693988 3918573
Name of nearest waterbody: Cape Fear River
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
See Attached

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Potential Wetlands and Waters
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
1:24,000 Lillington
❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Soil Survey of Harnett County
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ■❑ Aerial (Name & Date): Potential Wetlands/Waters
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Estimated Amount
Geographic
Site #
Lat
Long
of Aquatic Resource
Type of Aquatic Resource
Authority
in Review Area
Non wetland water
T1
35.39180
-78.86649
3,083 LF
Section 404
(Perennial stream)
Non wetland water
T2
35.38850
-78.87062
319 LF
Section 404
(Perennial stream)
Non wetland water
T3
35.38898
-78.86487
349 LF
Section 404
(Perennial stream)
Non wetland water
D1
35.39351
-78.86128
81 LF
Section 404
(Ditch)
W1
35.39386
-78.87110
0.02 AC
Wetland
Section 404
W2
35.39282
-78.86657
0.17 AC
Wetland
Section 404
W3
35.39225
-78.86641
0.01 AC
Wetland
Section 404
W4
35.39194
-78.86735
1.94 AC
Wetland
Section 404
W5
35.39070
-78.86737
0.06 AC
Wetland
Section 404
W6
35.38952
-78.86905
0.07 AC
Wetland
Section 404
W7
35.38911
-78.86958
0.21 AC
Wetland
Section 404
W8
35.38874
-78.87079
0.02 AC
Wetland
Section 404
W9
35.38831
-78.87071
0.92 AC
Wetland
Section 404

Estimated Amount
Geographic
Site #
Lat
Long
of Aquatic Resource
Type of Aquatic Resource
Authority
in Review Area
W10
35.39098
-78.86231
5.30 AC
Wetland
Section 404
W11
35.38934
-78.86111
2.08 AC
Wetland
Section 404

DocuSign Envelope ID: 25172E42-D3A8-46A9-AO70-2DF37CEEOA30
Irerracon
USACEINCDWR Agent Authorization Form
Property/Site
Address of Site:
[? v &,&J"(
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): a � 3 q — � 5 ~ 0056, 000
Owner Information:
Name: (!4e- �ue,llbye-
Address: P, Cd r RO� 117�7p/
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address. r' le&q 0 uJA 1J +7 k, iie4
Property Owner Certification:
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
and/ or the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) to enter upon the property
herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination
associated with Waters of the U.S (WOTUS) subject to Federal/State jurisdiction under Section
404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Terracon, as designated by the current property owner, is the authorized consultant to coordinate,
schedule, and provide supplemental information to both agencies in support of this verification
and/or permit application.
/—DocuSigned by:
Property Owner Signature:
Date: 10/30/2023
Terracon Consultants Inc. 2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107. Raleigh, NC 28208-3608
P:919-873-2211 F:919-873-9555 terracon.com

Cape Fear River Basin
O
USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation
Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography
Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and
National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S. Censusi.
Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; U.S.
Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA National
Centers for Environmental Information, U.S. Coastal Relief Model. Data
refreshed April, 2023.
Legend
O Project Study Area
Data Sources:
Site Boundary provided by Client &
NC One Map Data
0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000
Fee
PM:
RG
Project No.
70237261
Wrerracon
USGS Topo
EXHIBIT
No.
Drawn By:
RG
Scale:
1 in = 1,000 ft
Truelove Enterprises Property
Harnett County,
North Carolina
1
Checked By:
JH
File Path:
Site Diagram
pproved By:
JH J
Date:
4/27/2023
2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107 Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

NRCS Soils Mapping Units
Bb:Bibb soils, frequently flooded
FuB: Fuquay gravelly loamy sand, 0-6% slopes
GaB:Gilead loamy sand, 2-8% slopes Bb
NoB:Norfolk loamy sand, 2-6% slopes
WaB:Wagram loamy sand, 0-6% slopes
Wa B
NeD \ / \dhk"
Legend
O Project Study Area
FuB
Ut
Data Sources:
Site Boundary provided by Client &
NC One Map Data
0 200 400 800 1,200
Fee
PM:
RG
Project No.
70237261
Wrerracon
NRCS SOIIS
EXHIBIT
NO.
Drawn By:
RG
Scale:
1 in = 400 ft
Truelove Enterprises Property
Harnett County,
North Carolina
3
Checked By:
JH
File Path:
Site Diagram
pproved By:
JH J
Date:
4/27/2023
2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107 Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

OProject Study Area —Potential Tributary
®Potential Wetland Potential Ditch
Legend Data Sources:
Site Boundary provided by Client &
NC One Map Data
0 200 400 800 1,200
Fee
PM:
RG
Project No.
70237261
lFrerracon
Potential Wetlands and Waters
EXHIBIT
NO.
Drawn By:
RG
Scale:
1 in = 400 ft
Truelove Enterprises Property
Harnett County,
North Carolina
3
Checked By:
JH
File Path:
Site Diagram
pproved By:
JH
Date:
5/4/2023
2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107 Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
T1
Date: May 3, 2023
Project/Site: Truelove Enterprise
Latitude: 35.39222
Evaluator: Graham, Rhiannon
county: Harnett County
Longitude: 78.86632
Total Points:
47.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Lillington
Stream is at least intermittent
if>_ 19 or erennial if 30`
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =29 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = $
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
T2
Date: May 3, 2023
Project/Site: Truelove Enterprise
Latitude: 35.38852
Evaluator: Graham, Rhiannon
county: Harnett County
Longitude: 78.87004
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 38.25
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Lillington
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30`
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 2 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6.75 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
T3
Date: May 2, 2023
Project/Site: Truelove Enterprise
Latitude: 35.38912
Evaluator: Graham, Rhiannon
county: Harnett County
Longitude: 78.86458
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 39.75
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Lillington
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30`
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 23 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = F 7.ri
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Truelove Enterprises Property City/County: Harnett County Sampling Date: 02 May, 2023
Applicant/Owner: Triangle Land Partners, LLC State: NC Sampling Point:W4 Wet
Investigator(s): Graham, Rhiannon; Reenan, Nick Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-6
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 35.39213 Long:-78.86707 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb Soils, frequently flooded NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
represents W1,W2,W3,W4,W5,W6,W7,W8
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
✓ Surface Water (Al)
✓ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
✓ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 3„
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): Surface
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): Surface
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W4 Wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft. radius ) % Cover Species? Status
1 Acer rubrum 20 Yes FAC
2.
3.
6.
7.
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30ft. radius )
1 Acer rubrum 20 Yes FAC
2. Ligustrum sinense 60 Yes FACU
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 40
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30ft. radius )
1. Arundinaria gigantea
-) Woodwardia areolata
3.
4.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft. radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
2. Rubus argutus
4.
5.
80 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 16
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.43% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply
by:
OBL species
x 1 =
0
FACW species
x 2 =
0
FAC species
x 3 =
0
FACU species
x 4 =
0
UPL species
x 5 =
0
Column Totals:
(A)
0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is:53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
20 = Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20% of total cover: 4
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
heiaht.
15 Yes FAC
10 Yes FACU
25 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 12.5 20% of total cover: 5
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W4 wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-3 10Y4 3/2 100 Loam
3-20 10YR 6/2 90 7.5Y 4/6 10 C M Loamy Clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
TVDe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Truelove Enterprises Property City/County: Harnett County Sampling Date: 02 May, 2023
Applicant/Owner: Triangle Land Partners, LLC State: NC Sampling Point:W4 Up
Investigator(s): Graham, Rhiannon; Reenan, Nick Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 2-8%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 35.39223 Long:-78.86773 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Gilead loamy sand, 2-8% slopes NWI classification: PFF
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks:
Represents W1,W2,W3,W4,W5,W6,W7,W8
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): NA
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): >20"
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): '20„
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W4 Up
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius ) % Cover Species? Status
1 Pinus taeda 15 Yes FAC
2.
3.
6.
7.
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover: 3
Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1 Ligustrum sinense 80 Yes FACU
2. Acer Rubrum 10 No FAC
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 45
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1. Ligustrum sinense
2 Rubus argutus
3 Polystichum acrostichoides
4.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 27.5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1. Lonicera japonica
2. Gelsemium sempervirens
4.
5.
90 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 18
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 42.86% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply
by:
OBL species
x 1 =
0
FACW species
x 2 =
0
FAC species 55
x 3 =
165
FACU species 155
x 4 =
620
UPL species
x 5 =
0
Column Totals: 210
(A)
785 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.7
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is:53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
15 Yes FACU Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
55 = Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20°k of total cover: 11
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
heiaht.
20 Yes FACU
30 Yes FAC
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No ✓
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W4 Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type, Locz Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 4/4 100 Loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
on: rL=rore Lining, ivi=iviainx.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric So
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Truelove Enterprises Property City/County: Harnett County Sampling Date: 02 May, 2023
Applicant/Owner: Triangle Land Partners, LLC State: NC Sampling Point:W10 Wet
Investigator(s): Graham, Rhiannon; Reenan, Nick Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-6
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 35.39094 Long:-78.86253 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Fuquay Gravelley Loamy Sand, 0-6% slopes NWI classification: PFF
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
Represents W9,W10,W11
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
✓ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
✓ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
✓ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
✓ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 6„
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): Surface
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): Surface
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W10 Wet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft. radius )
1 Acer rubrum
2. Nyssa sylvatica
3. Liriodendron tulipifera
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 45
Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30ft. radius )
1 Acer rubrum
2. Nyssa sylvatica
3. Liriodendron tulipifera
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 35
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30ft. radius )
1. Arundinaria gigantea
3.
4.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft. radius )
1.
2.
4.
5.
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
30
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
5 (A)
40
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
20
Yes
FACU
Species Across All Strata:
7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
71.43°k (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
90
Total % Cover of:
Multiply
by:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover: 18
OBL species
x 1 =
0
FACW species
x 2 =
0
20
Yes FAC
FAC species
x 3 =
0
30
Yes FAC
FACU species
x 4 =
0
20
Yes FACU
UPL species
x 5 =
0
Column Totals:
(A)
0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is:53.0'
70 = Total Cover
4 -Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
20% of total cover: 14
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
CA„XA, _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
10 = Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20% of total cover: 2
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
heiaht.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W10 wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-6 2.5Y 2.5/1 100 C M Loam
6-20 2.5Y 6/1 90 7.5Y4 4/6 10 C M Loamy Clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
TVDe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Truelove Enterprises Property City/County: Harnett County Sampling Date: 02 May, 2023
Applicant/Owner: Triangle Land Partners, LLC State: NC Sampling Point:W10 Up
Investigator(s): Graham, Rhiannon; Reenan, Nick Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 0-6%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 35.39103 Long:-78.86278 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Fuquay Gravelley Loamy Sand, 0-6% slopes NWI classification: PFF
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks:
This is an agriculture field
represents W8,W9,W10
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): NA
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): >20"
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): '20„
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W10 Up
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1 none present
2.
3.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 0
Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1 none present
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1. Festuca rubra
-) Taraxacum officinale
3.
4.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 50
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1. None present
2.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Oak (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply
by:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0
OBL species
x 1 =
0
FACW species
x 2 =
0
FAC species
x 3 =
0
FACU species 100
x 4 =
400
UPL species
x 5 =
0
Column Totals: 100
(A)
400 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is:53.0'
= Total Cover
4 -Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
20% of total cover: 0
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Rn V.. Fnri 1 — Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Zu Yes rAUU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
100 = Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20% of total cover: 20
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
heiaht.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No ✓
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W10 Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type, Locz Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 5/4 100 clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
on: rL=rore Lining, ivi=iviainx.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric So
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Project No. 70237261 rr ierracon
Cq
IA a 2 Y fi�•C; 1Y y yhS^�- ". R - iir.
+iCd
y.
,� �!• � !"_" k �* " AYE¢+"x� �" .,.�6 � a/,���� � �� :-'� i�'�, � � r.
VIA
CO
Vi
LO
i
CO
CO
e
Photograph 1- W1 wetland.
co _
N ffi'
C�3
�• i
CO
CO�� - -
�g >
t k
5
0 "f - g r A
gat c%F 9. a +rd r A' � .. 4
� �%�� � �,� �. ,*�1 dam.•'
-,9
J �i ill CO
"W. '
ar
,r
h
Za®a q=S
LO r
Photograph 2- W2 Werland.
Truelove Enterprises Property

:' r6 ���, � i iI `. � T� •�4 �k ,R a �+,�.�- 'gyp+`.%' ���:
ti — • jS
�� • � � �� � ��£ �- � ,cry ���� � e.� � ,. £ � ,
•• a�i,� � s i'� r
��y[yC✓..,may"+��� .y.��{�. - "�W�y
. •7"F Ia► .nt'i ��w .-.,...

W NW l N NE
40 270 300 330 0 30 60.
-41
�Y 7
OF
W
�`.03 May 2023, 14:02:30

Project No. 70237261 rr ierracon
to
LO
+I
F l O ,p J
N �L g
fT^
W µ
C'7
11 ma
Photograph 7- W9 wetland.
LD
lzt
CO
Lo
CO
W
1-4
LO
T"
Photograph 8- W9 wetland.
Truelove Enterprises Property

Is.
C\l
50
0A PC
Aw La,
1
77
CD
A i'l 0
V
w� P, C\f

g R Y� +C ,} � � Cg{ Z ,• s s Ids@ e _ a^ ;�
1p
3
yy
a
e

0
L —
0
rn —
m
r

Project No. 70237261 rr ierracon
Truelove Enterprises Property

Project No. 70237261 rr ierracon
i 150 180 2101 SW 240 270 300
BRG: 214°SW (T) LAT. 35.389455 LON:-78.868832 ±42ft ALT: 210ft
If �. r� -1 �. � k tier '•
1
.e
- e•
';.
V
Photograph 17- Tributary T1 downstream.
r..
� 4At kf b�ff�a� i
w� x r r CAI i i.i t� �.:
[x ttlI
td {������ ��
ot
Co
Cd
t7k ; F
3' "` . , A.. ?
as a yi vSl �"{i6al �'
Co
4$ - r.
,• 4
M'fill`.
Uk
Photograph 18- Tributary T1 at southern boundary.
Truelove Enterprises Property

Letter of Findings

ierracon
May 10, 2023
Triangle Land Partners, LLC
PO Box 5548
Cary, NC 27512
Attn: Andrew Ross
P: [phone]
E: andrewross647(cbgmail.com
RE: Truelove Enterprises Property
Wetlands/Waters Delineation
Harnett County, NC
Terracon Project No: 70237261
Dear Mr. Ross:
2401 Brentwood Rd, Suite 107
Raleigh, NC 27604
P [phone]
Terracon.com
Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon), has completed the requested wetlands and waters
delineation for the Truelove Enterprises Property, totaling approximately 121.44-acres in Harnett
County, NC (Exhibit 1). Terracon staff was tasked with identifying features that may be considered
subject to jurisdiction and permitting requirements under Sections 404 and 401 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA) and under the North Carolina Isolated and Other Non-404 Jurisdictional Wetlands and
Waters program.
Background Research
Prior to the initiation of field efforts, several available resources were reviewed, including the U.S.
Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangles of Lillington, NC, the Natural
Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Published Soil Survey of Harnett County, NC, aerial
photography, and other publicly available mapping resources. Field work was conducted by
technical staff on May 2 and May 3, 2023.
Topography
Topography in the study area is characterized by slopes and drainages. Elevations range from a
high of approximately 260 feet above mean sea level (MSL) down to approximately 190 feet above
MSL (Exhibit 1) based on a review of USGS mapping and other online resources.
Soils
Exhibit 2 depicts five soil mapping units potentially occurring in the study area: Bibb soils,
frequently flooded; Fuquay gravelly loamy sand, 0-6% slopes; Gilead loamy sand, 2-8% slopes;
Norfolk loamy sand, 2-6% slopes; and Wagram loamy sand, 0-6% slopes.
The soil mapping units Bibb soils, frequently flooded and Gilead loamy sand, 2-8% slopes, all
potentially occurring in the study area, are considered hydric (wetland) soils by NRCS.
Explore with us

Truelove Enterprises Property I Harnett County, NC
May 10, 2023 I Terracon Project No. 70237261 , ierracon
Wetlands and Waters
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires regulation of discharges into waters of the U.S.
(WOTUS). Although the principal administrative agency of the CWA is the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has major responsibility for
implementation, permitting, and enforcement of provisions of the CWA. Water bodies such as
rivers, lakes, and streams are subject to jurisdictional consideration under the Section 404
program. However, by regulation, certain wetlands are also considered WOTUS.
Currently WOTUS are assessed by the CWA's 2023 definition of WOTUS. This definition of WOTUS
includes the implementation of rulemaking as decided in the Supreme Court's 2015 decision of the
consolidated cases Rapanos v. United States and Carabeii v. United States.
Specifically, the following waters will be under federal jurisdiction pursuant to the CWA:
• Traditional navigable waters (TNWs)
• Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
• Non -navigable tributaries of traditional navigable waters that are relatively permanent
where the tributaries typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally
(3 months)
• Wetlands that directly abut such tributaries
• Relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water "forming
geographic features" that are described in ordinary parlance as "streams, oceans, rivers,
and lakes". These are Relatively Permanent Waters (RPWs).
The following waters will be considered jurisdictional if a significant nexus (contributes to the
physical, chemical, or biological integrity of downstream TNWs) exists between these features and
traditional navigable waters:
• Non -navigable tributaries that are not relatively permanent
• Wetlands adjacent to non -navigable tributaries that are not relatively permanent
• Wetlands adjacent to but that do not directly abut a relatively permanent non -navigable
tributary
The following waters will be considered non jurisdictional under the CWA:
• Swales or Erosional features (gullies, small washes characterized by low volume, infrequent
or short duration flows)
• Ditches (including roadside ditches) excavated wholly in and draining only uplands and that
do not carry a relatively permanent flow of water.
However, wetlands and other waterbodies that do not fall under federal regulation per the CWA
may be subject to jurisdiction by the N.C. Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) under the state's
Isolated and Other Non-404 Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters program.
Our delineation methodology generally follows the guidance outlined in the Regional Supplement
to the USACE Wetland Delineation Manual for the Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region, which
states that areas must exhibit three distinct characteristics to be considered jurisdictional
wetlands: 1) prevalence of hydrophytic (water tolerant) plants; 2) presence of hydric soils; and 3)
sufficient wetland hydrology indicators within 12 inches of the ground surface.
The study area was also reviewed for the presence of tributaries (stream channels) using criteria
provided by the USACE and the NCDWR. When present, intermittent and perennial tributaries,
and certain other surface waters, are also considered jurisdictional by the USACE and/or NCDWR.
2
Explore with us

Truelove Enterprises Property I Harnett County, NC
May 10, 2023 I Terracon Project No. 70237261 , ierracon
Preliminary Delineation Results
Our review of the Truelove Enterprises property identified eleven (11) potential wetlands and three
(3) potential tributaries (Exhibit 3). Potential wetlands were flagged with pink -and -black and blue
flagging and potential tributaries were flagged with blue and orange flagging.
These delineation results are considered preliminary and are subject to review and approval by the
USACE, should you request, and USACE chooses to review the delineation. Exhibit 3 depicts the
approximate location and extent of the potential wetland and waters and was prepared using non -
survey grade, sub -meter GPS data. Exhibit 3 is not a replacement for a traditional survey. It is
suitable for preliminary planning purposes only and for use by a surveyor to aid in locating flags.
The following tables contain the specific information for the potential wetlands and tributaries that
were identified and delineated inside the property boundary. The potential wetlands were classified
according to the North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method (NCWAM). The wetlands onsite were
classified as Headwater Forest Wetlands and Riverine Swamp Forest Wetlands. Headwater Forest
wetlands are found in geographic floodplains of first order or smaller streams and in crenulations
without a stream. Riverine Swamp Forests are characterized by seasonal to semi -permanent
inundation and occur in headwaters of streams and depressions, amongst other things.
Table 1. Potential Wetlands Identified for the Truelove Enterprises Property
Potential
NCWAM
Approximate
Hydrophytic
Hydric Soil
Indicators of
Wetland
Classification
size (ac)
Vegetation'
(Munsell
Hydrology'
ID
color)
Headwater
Netted chain
2.5Y 5/1
Saturation,
W1
Forest
0.02
fern, red maple
with Redox
drainage
patterns
Headwater
Netted chain
2/1
Surface water,
W2
Forest
0.17
fern, red maple,
with th Redox
drainage
giant cane
patterns
Headwater
Netted chain
2.5Y 2/1
Saturation,
W3
Forest
D.01
fern, red maple
with Redox
drainage
patterns
Headwater
Netted chain
R 3/2
Surface water,
W4
Forest
1.94
fern, red maple,
with Redox
th
drainage
Chinese privet
patterns
Headwater
Netted chain
10YR 3/2
Saturation,
W5
Forest
0.06
fern, red maple
with Redox
drainage
patterns
Headwater
Netted chain
10YR 3/2
Saturation,
W6
Forest
0.07
fern, red maple,
with Redox
drainage
giant cane
patterns
Headwater
Netted chain
R 3/2
Surface water,
W7
Forest
0.21
fern, red maple,
with th Redox
drainage
giant cane
patterns
Headwater
Netted chain
10YR 3/2
Saturation,
W8
Forest
0.02
fern, red maple
with Redox
drainage
patterns
3
Explore with us

Truelove Enterprises Property I Harnett County, NC
May 10, 2023 1 Terracon Project No. 70237261
,, Terracon
Potential
NCWAM
Approximate
Hydrophytic
Hydric Soil
Indicators of
Wetland
Classification
size (ac)
Vegetation'
(Munsell
Hydrology'
ID
color)
Netted chain
Water -stained
W9
Headwater
0.92
fern, red maple,
10YR 3/2
leaves,
Forest
with Redox
drainage
giant cane
patterns
Riverine
Black gum, red
2.5YSurface
2.5/1
water,
W10
Swamp Forest
5.30
maple, sensitive
with
with redox
drainage
fern
patterns
Riverine
Black gum, red
2.5Y 2.5/1
Surface water,
W11
Swamp Forest
2.08
maple, sensitive
with redox
drainage
fern
patterns
Total:
10.81 AC
1 Does not include all hydrophytic vegetation or hydrology indicators
Table 2. Potential Tributaries Identified for the Truelove Enterprises Property
Potential
Tributary ID
Flow Regime'
NCDWR Stream
Score
Approximate Amount
in Study Area (LF)
T1
Perennial
47.5
3,083
T2
Perennial
38.25
319
T3
Perennial
39.75
349
Total:
3,716 LF
1 Based on NCDWR score at the time of the site investigation, however each stream is mapped as
intermittent on USGS mapping.
All three tributaries flow in a south-western direction and eventually leave the property before
flowing into the Duncan's Creek.
One potentially jurisdictional ditch was observed on site (D1) totaling in 81 ft.
Clean Water Act Permitting
Most impacts to wetlands and WOTUS, which are deemed under the jurisdiction of either the federal
or state regulatory authority (USACE or NCDWR, respectively) must first be permitted pursuant to
Section 404 and Section 401 of the CWA and/or the State's Isolated and Other Non-404
Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters program. Activities so authorized are subject to additional
requirements to comply with water quality and storm water management regulations. The
Nationwide Permit (NWP) program, administered by USACE, provides permitting of impacts which
do not exceed pre -determined thresholds. The delineated features will likely be subject to Section
404 jurisdiction. If determined necessary, Terracon can prepare and submit a Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) request to USACE to request written concurrence through a site
visit or desktop review. If no impacts to any of the WOTUS delineated onsite are proposed, then
a PJD is not necessary.
4
Explore with us

Truelove Enterprises Property I Harnett County, NC ierracon
May 10, 2023 Terracon Project No. 70237261
Riparian Buffers/Setbacks
The study area is within the Cape Fear River Basin. Specifically, the study area is in Harnett County.
The Cape Fear River basin does not implement riparian buffers. However, Harnett County
implements Watershed Buffer Rules within the WS-IV-PA watershed district, a 100-foot riparian
buffer may apply to all perennial streams as indicated on ethe 1:24,000 scale (7.5 minute)
quadrangle topographic map (Exhibit 1). Otherwise, a 30-ft riparian buffer is subject to intermittent
streams as indicated on ethe 1:24,000 scale (7.5 minute) quadrangle topographic map (Exhibit
1).
Although T1, T2, and T3 scored high enough to be considered perennial, they are depicted on the
1:24,000 scale (7.5 minute) quadrangle topographic map (Exhibit 1) as intermittent streams.
Therefore, tributaries T1, T2, and T3 will likely be subject to a 30-foot riparian buffer. Impacts to
the riparian buffer will require coordination with Harnett County.
Recommendations
Three (3) potential tributaries and eleven (11) potential wetlands have been delineated on the
Truelove Enterprises Property Site. Terracon recommends that a PJD request be submitted to
USACE if there is a possibility of Section 404 permitting being needed for the project. We are
prepared to do this upon your authorization.
Please contact our office if you have questions regarding this evaluation.
Sincerely,
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Rhli i ion Gp-ahaw
Rhiannon Graham
Senior Staff Scientist
CC: Kirby LaForce
Attachments: Exhibits & Photographs
Jeff fArbogr
Jeff Harbour, SPWS
Senior Scientist
5
Explore with us

Cape Fear River Basin
O
USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation
Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography
Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and
National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S. Cens,usi.
Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; U.S.
Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA National
Centers for Environmental Information, U.S. Coastal Relief Model. Data
refreshed April, 2023.
Legend
O Project Study Area
Data Sources:
Site Boundary provided by Client &
NC One Map Data
0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000
Fee
PM:
RG
Project No.
70237261
W ierracvn
USGS TOpo
EXHIBIT
No.
Drawn By:
RG
Scale:
1 in = 1,000 ft
Truelove Enterprises Property
Harnett County,
North Carolina
1
Checked By:
JH
File Path:
Site Dia ram
ved By:
FT__
JH
Date:
4/27/2023
2401 Brentwood Road. suite 107 Raleigh, NG 27604
Rhone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

NRCS Soils Mapping Units N
Bb:Bibb soils, frequently flooded
FuB: Fuquay gravelly loamy sand, 0-6% slopes �z
GaB:Gilead loamy sand, 2-8% slopes Bb
NoB:Norfolk loamy sand, 2-6% slopes
WaB:Wagram loamy sand, 0-6% slopes
r +'
FuB
aa13 a
GaB_4V
Ne D E3,
Legend
O Project Study Area
Data Sources:
Site Boundary provided by Client &
NC One Map Data
0 200 400 800 1,200
Fee
PM:
RG
Project No.
70237261
W ierracvn
NRCS SOIIS
EXHIBIT
NO.
Drawn By:
RG
Scale:
1 in = 400 ft
Truelove Enterprises Property
Harnett County,
North Carolina
3
Checked By:
JH
File Path:
Site Dia ram
Approved By:
J H J
Date:
1 4/27/2023
2401 Brentwood Road. suite 107 Raleigh, NG 27604
1
Phone: [phone] Fax: (919) s73-B555

t
1> These preliminary delineation results are subject to regulatory review A
` ,r
' • and concurrence. IV
.� This is not a replacement for a traditional survey and is suitable for
preliminary planning purposes only and for use to aid in location of flags.
Tributaries T1, T2, and T3 will likely be subject to a 30-ft Harnett County
Riparian Buffer.
Pk
W1 " p11,
�ar r �..
Mcp
} ougaid .'YT1 u
S�e�c► W2 - S
1 W5 '• ,�
W6 p T1 W1
W7 ,;
W
Flagging
Sequences
T1:TB1-TB89
W2:WD1-WD9
W7:Wl1-Wl17
T2:TC1-TC13
W3:WE1-WE4
W8:WJ1-WJ4
T3:TA1-TA4
W4:WF1-WF31
W9:WK1-WK10,WL1-WL10
D1:DA1-DA4
W5:WG1-WG7
W10:WA1-WA36, WA1A-WA39A,
W1:WM1-WM5
W6:WH1-WH5
WB9-WB34, WB1B-WB7B
W11:WB1-WB7, WC1-WC4
Legend Data Sources:
Site Boundary provided by Client &
Project Study Area Potential Tributary NC One Map Data
Potential Wetland Potential Ditch 0 200 400 800 1,200
Fee
PM:
RG
Project No.
70237261
w ierracvn
Potential Wetlands and Waters
EXHIBIT
NO.
Drawn By:
RG
Scale:
1 in = 400 ft
Truelove Enterprises Property
Harnett County,
North Carolina
3
Checked By:
JH
File Path:
Site Diagram,
Approved By:
JH
Date:
5/4/2023
2401 Brentwood Road. suite 107 Raleigh, Nc 27604
Phone: [phone] Fax: (919) s73-B555

Project No. 70237261 w ierracon
Truelove Enterprises Property

U) C:)
co —
46
OV,
FF
IW� MR,
7w,
51;l
J--
Ar.
Photograph 3- W4 wetland.
O
L-6

Project No. 70237261 w ierracon
Truelove Enterprises Property

Project No. 70237261 w ierracon
Truelove Enterprises Property

^'�'
Y. P317
R4
'Kim'
iv
,
i

UJ'
t> r
a� .e,.
ii �

• M
• i � 4 y�fi < F.l
. h 3 ��f SS �'l 9� yv��ACv � � ^��' �J,.y � f���� Xt"'✓
• `. n4 � � iiiil�f����: j�'9 y�� .� `�.r Er��P�_ �I ij '�
�— •! 1�
AL—
V
N
t Q e��yy
M., ;4v
OAK-
Nw
z, r
C L
y�
Or
• + pi 'r 3 ,� '� t � Cif
W-
\ s �6
s - �
N
Wes— a;

Project No. 70237261 w ierracon
Truelove Enterprises Property

Project No. 70237261 w ierracon
Truelove Enterprises Property

Project No. 70237261
w ierracon
VO
2
n
- h
Y
i 4. S
r 3
r
Photograph 19- Tributary T2 upstream.
Photograph 20- Tributary T3 across.
Truelove Enterprises Property

Project No. 70237261 o ierracon
+r
v --
l'11J A
T�
Z
(Y)
O
L0
Co
05
i
O
J
LD
CO
Co
Co
C+?
LD
(r} y
Q
Co
Photograph 21: Tributary T3 downstream.
:0
BRG:1990S (T) LAT- 35.392758 LON:-78.863613 ±16ft ALT. 253ft
1
Z. r,6a
y''r
Photograph 22: View of ag field.
Truelove Enterprises Property

USFWS
Self -Certification
Package

� 47T OF Tj��i
a Zo United States Department of the
9
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
�AJ�CH 31ah
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: 11 /2/23
Self -Certification Letter
Project Name Elyse Meadows
IPaC Project Code:
Dear Applicant:
IPaC Record Locator 4
Interior
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
❑proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
0 "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Version 5/22/2023

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov. If you have any
questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact Leigh Mann of
this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package
Version 5/22/2023

ME
U
cn
cn
O
U
O
U
C�6
L
_N
cB
Q
N
N
O
N
_O
N
c3
Cl
co
U c6 a)O "N Q -
N CB
N m
N
N
_cn L
O
U cn CJ)
L N= -N W
cn
U
�_
U
L
U
N
U
(6
N—
U)= w-� N N.0
U
cB
p
N -
(D
Q cn
co
- N (�
cn
U
U
U
N
U
O a-
Q O
N
p c
N
c
O
N
U
N
-O
co
pO
cn
O
-
N = N � = -(D
cn
�
�
co �
O
N
U
N
cn
cn
L_0 � � _
O
ai
_
c O
2f
O 0
U �Ole
O
N
E
i i
ti
O
Q
e
Co —
OU
CT
•�
0
5
cr N
c6 •� N
N
� i
(�
O .�
F
O
��_
O .O
O
O '�
(�
N
O N
N
0
N '�
.N N Q '� E -o
cn O
O
cn N O
cn O
_N
co -0
cn
cn Eco
0
L 0
O O N U U
N
O
U
> co
U
O
co
y
Z C1) U
co Q W N N
U
U
-�
N U �_
�
c�
U_ �_
cn
��
N
O N N L U .L
N
� �_j
N
Z
� �_j
N
cx
U
/cB\
O
Z
N
L N N -0 N
Q
. L
ii:
O
O
/ice
U ,
Ca
�J
N
O
0-0 p p Z
O cl
N
m
��
N
E
Co �
�U
Z
U)
�U
.O
Q�
co
QCM
N
2
2
2
N
cn N
O—
= O _U
co N>—
-0
Z
N
N
Z�
Z
2 N
Z
>,
cn O U co L
co
U p
p
Uco
p
p
_
Q-0
U)N (B cn .� LL /)
C)
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z O
V
a
cc O
LU ' a
N
U
Z
U
N
1�cr
L
L Jcr
L
0
O
O
Z
O
Z
O
v
N
C
a
U)
LU
cn
U
cn
p
cn
_p
cn
N
N
Q
N
Q
cn
O
Q
Q O
N
y
c6
c6
Co
O
C�
N N
L
U
_�
0
co
2
m cn
O
_
Co
U
m
L
c
co
0
C/)
U)
O
�
U) =
cn
O
co
Z
co
Z
C
E
L
c6
Z
U
Q
L
N
>+
N
i
co m
p0
�
N
O
�
U)
O
m
N
N
N
cB
N
>
_O
O
LL
co
i
_U
H
Y
0
N
N
co
O
U
U
�
O
N
O
CL
N
LY

is
ca
_
0
L
Occ
U
L
E
N
N
O
O
ca
W
Z
O
a
Z
Z
U
Z
v
a
O
W y--
U
U
E
W
W
O i
O
O
p
N
a
N
W
Q�
U)(n
N U)
N
Q
N
CD-
0
ca N
O
ca
ca
L
N
O
N
Z
z �
N
E
Z
v
_
�
L
m
LU
U
70
O
U
a>
N
AI
M
O �
N
O
0- 0)
O c
L •—
Q
N
Ln
c�
0

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
+ Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2024-0031625
Project Name: elyse meadows subdivision
_�
FIAN &WILWAM
4An7rR
January 02, 2024
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

01/02/2024
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
https://www.fws. gov/sites/defaultlfiles/documents/endangered-species-consultation-
handbook.pdf
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts, see https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-bird-permit/what-
we-do.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures, see https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/threats-birds.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/partner/council-conservation-
migratory-birds.

01/02/2024
3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries
• Bald & Golden Eagles
• Migratory Birds
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

01/02/2024
4
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2024-0031625
Project Name: elyse meadows subdivision
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: proposed subdivision
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/(a)35.390886699999996,-78.8659793914638,14z
Counties: Harnett County, North Carolina

01/02/2024 5
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
NAME STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
REPTILES
NAME STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis Similarity of
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Appearance
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776 (Threatened)
FISHES
NAME STATUS
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6063

01/02/2024
H.
INSECTS
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
FLOWERING PLANTS
NAME STATUS
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.
USFWS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE LANDS
AND FISH HATCHERIES
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.
BALD & GOLDEN EAGLES
Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Acti and the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to bald or
golden eagles, or their habitats3, should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links below. Specifically,
please review the "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles".
1. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
2. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
THERE ARE NO BALD AND GOLDEN EAGLES WITHIN THE VICINITY OF YOUR PROJECT AREA.

01/02/2024
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Acti and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links below. Specifically,
please review the "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles".
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla Breeds Mar 1 to Jul
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation 15
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9427
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental Aug 25
USA and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9406
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental 31
USA and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9513
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read "Supplemental
Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section titled "Proper
Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret
this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project
overlaps during that week of the year.

01/02/2024
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire
range.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project area overlaps.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Brown -headed '
Nuthatch ---
BCC -BCR
Chimney Swift
BCC Rangew de — — — -
- — — -
-III IIII IIII IIII IIII I�11 — — — -
- — — -
- — — -
---
(CON)
Prairie warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-mi rator.
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/
media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-
project-action

01/02/2024
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency: Terracon Consultants
Name: Rhiannon Graham
Address: 2401 Brentwood Rd.
Address Line 2: Suite 107
City:
Raleigh
State:
NC
Zip:
27610
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
9194571110

Roy Cooper, Governor
�R ■■■
■■ x INC DEPARTMENT OF
■■ . 00 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ MEN
January 2, 2024
Rhiannon Graham
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: elyse meadows
Dear Rhiannon Graham:
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
MiAy Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Yrogram
101 \�� M1UKWZEA�1
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact the NCNHP at natural.heritage�dncr.nc.gov.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
0EPAR7MENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
p] 121 W. JONES STREET RALE IGH. r-t% 27603 - 1651 M1IAIL SERviGE CCN ITR. RALEdGH. WC 27609
& OFC 019.7R79120 • FAX 919,707.9121

CO
■
■
4
a
§
> s
3 / \ e (
CO CO/ % /
s / z ± CO
.2 =
s H
\ \
\\
/Eqe
e
CO a) e v
*
`
\ \
«
\ \
~
\ o
\
Al
e
3
\ E
.D co
/ /
E
}
O
e
_
2 e
/ E
s `
\ u
E
\
0
\
/
/ \
■
CO
4
\
�
/
\
cn
./
CO
E
}
O
CO
.k
3
\
\
\
E
\
0
CO
ƒ
\
\
CO
\
/
\\
§
/

m
�
O
_0
Q
0
E
0
@
Q
CY)
cy')
�
�
N
W
�
�
z
C)
z
s
5
s
\
c

Cape Fear River Basin
O
USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation
Program, Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography
Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and
National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S. Censusi.
Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; U.S.
Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA National
Centers for Environmental Information, U.S. Coastal Relief Model. Data
refreshed April, 2023.
Legend
O Project Study Area
Data Sources:
Site Boundary provided by Client &
NC One Map Data
0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000
Fee
PM:
RG
Project No.
70237261
Wrerracon
USGS Topo
EXHIBIT
No.
Drawn By:
RG
Scale:
1 in = 1,000 ft
Truelove Enterprises Property
Harnett County,
North Carolina
1
Checked By:
JH
File Path:
Site Diagram
pproved By:
JH J
Date:
4/27/2023
2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107 Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Wa B
NRCS Soils Mapping Units
Bb:Bibb soils, frequently flooded
FuB: Fuquay gravelly loamy sand, 0-6% slopes
GaB:Gilead loamy sand, 2-8% slopes Bb
NoB:Norfolk loamy sand, 2-6% slopes
WaB:Wagram loamy sand, 0-6% slopes
Apo-,
WaB
;00.
0e0000000
41 . • +� r,
m`' No 0
N ea D B b
Legend
O Project Study Area
FuB
Ut
Data Sources:
Site Boundary provided by Client &
NC One Map Data
0 200 400 800 1,200
Fee
PM:
RG
Project No.
70237261
Wrerracon
NRCS SOIIS
EXHIBIT
NO.
Drawn By:
RG
Scale:
1 in = 400 ft
Truelove Enterprises Property
Harnett County,
North Carolina
3
Checked By:
JH
File Path:
Site Diagram
pproved By:
JH J
Date:
4/27/2023
2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107 Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

OProject Study Area —Potential Tributary
®Potential Wetland Potential Ditch
Legend Data Sources:
Site Boundary provided by Client &
NC One Map Data
0 200 400 800 1,200
Fee
PM:
RG
Project No.
70237261
lFrerracon
Potential Wetlands and Waters
EXHIBIT
NO.
Drawn By:
RG
Scale:
1 in = 400 ft
Truelove Enterprises Property
Harnett County,
North Carolina
3
Checked By:
JH
File Path:
Site Diagram
pproved By:
JH
Date:
5/4/2023
2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107 Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

Project No. 70237261 rr ierracon
Cq
IA a 2 Y fi�•C; 1Y y yhS^�- ". R iir.
+iCd
y.
,� �!• � !"_" k �* " AYE¢+"x� �" .,.�6 � a/,���� � �� :-'� i�'�, � � r.
VIA
CO
Vi
LO
i
CO
CO
e
Photograph 1- W1 wetland.
co ,
N g'
J � •
C�3
O
� t
E
� Q
C14
N
� s
CO Oil
s
LO
s
fq
+ ,.
Photograph 2- W2 Werland.
Truelove Enterprises Property

;
If a!u �,��k - b r..a ! C•
AI
`� AZw rt{;wx. awl
y ` ``

W - NW l N NE
40 270 300 330 0 30 60.
i
_ram' • (, ��'" � `_ 1� � _ � _
b<
r
.�..._
�-.0s
_.May 2023, 14 02N .

Project No. 70237261 rr ierracon
4-1
tor t! 1 1 1 !.. Y ,
LO
N 4 NL
O ' —
r�
CO ay 4 c'r i 7s L Y 4
s _
j
0?
r '
62
r
3ff
Photograph 7- W9 wetland.
cs
LO
J _ �• .�+,�. � � �i � , ice:, � � -
+I 3,
CO
`1
C6
e �d` �s mot; j
d,
W ■� R:F
CO
y s� ->Y
l _
Ljf
LO
Ca
Photograph 8- W9 wetland.
Truelove Enterprises Property

a
-s
-L-LU
LU
Nz
17,
�L�} i '4�a+@�\.�.0 �:;���iFH :..gyp � 0. 1. k'��'•i�n�d�
Ai
pvf
lp
`���,
.- �"•� . � fir'

Project No. 70237261 rr ierracon
Truelove Enterprises Property

Project No. 70237261 rr ierracon
i 150 180 2101 SW 240 270 300
BRG: 214°SW (T) LAT. 35.389455 LON:-78.868832 ±42ft ALT: 210ft
If �. r� -1 �. � i tier '•
1
.e
- e•
Photograph 17- Tributary T1 downstream.
Q� k'�7 ��.9`.�. 5 1.��' � H�� �'f� '� Ali$ L1 ';i ���I'br'• f�._
CO ''� ��� �. I �a$► {i �'` � �"� :, �o ,ec. r r� � �JN''�i � ,,y �d ti
a�-
00
Cd
gyp. ,& . +� : }�1 - �CN
00
R� i .. - ✓" I: d
00
r�
Q `tk _
sip
vtof
00
Photograph 18- Tributary T1 at southern boundary.
Truelove Enterprises Property

WWI

LA